The main ethical question raised in the Adelphia Communications litigation is that the Rigas family acts in a morally meaningful way by lying and stealing, causing public distrust, or their actions against investors Whether it is morally acceptable as prevention or not. Negative Impact We will verify the first act committed first. John Rigas may argue that he tried to protect his investor by lying to the company's financial situation to increase existing capital and future profits. Moral Papers - Kant Ethics. Explanation of Kant's liability concept Emmanuel Kant is a German philosopher focused on creating a logical and absolute moral theory and does not change according to circumstances, John Rock and the others . An empiricist at the time. His ethics is based on responsibility, not the final product of action. His theory is very important, he thinks it can be compared with the Copernicus revolution. Kant's ethic is used as a (predominantly worthy) label of Kant's moral lineage but a series of contemporary moral standings different from Canto. His work is difficult and systematic. Understanding them helps to divide the study into three categories: his writings, work of early critics, and modern work strongly influenced by Kant. For the most part of this section I will explain the ethical aspects of Hum's ethics Kant, but I would like to start with a brief overview of Kant's mature moral philosophy. This is done by explaining five important functions for Kant's ethics. This helps to take this into account when dealing with Kant 's response to Hume' s ethics. Second, Kant's concept of autonomy is one of the more central, unique and influential aspects of his ethics. Kant defines autonomy as "an attribute of will" and itself is a law (it is independent from the attribute of the object of will) "(G 4: 440). According to Kant, it is autonomous because the will of the moral actor gives moral law to itself (which is self-legal) and can bind or motivate himself to comply with the law.

He was the fourth child of the nine children of Johann Georg and Anna Regina Kant and was born in Königsberg, East Prussia in 1724. The son of a saddle who does not stand out, whose families belong to the Protestant religious group and religion is very important in every aspect of their lives. Kant is critical of formal religion, but still admires the believers' actions. Kant went to Primary School at St. George Hospital Hospital and then went to Collegium Fredericia Num, Phoenician School he studied from 1732 to 1740. Emmanuel Kant - German philosopher Emmanuel Kant (1724-1804) is considered one of the founder of Western philosophy. In 1781, Kant is better than the opinion that a certain doctrine or other authority logical thinking, wrote a "reasonable criticism" to support the idea of ​​scientific logic and rational way of thinking. Bertrand Russell - British philosopher, mathematician, and Bertrand Russell (1872-1970, the third generation Russell Earl Russell Earl) to support the scientific method of Kant, knowledge is believed to be the "belief that consistent with the fact." It was. He claims that there is not enough just to believe that there is no evidence, but instead, whether there is a fact support that is accurate agreement, and Who should check whether to agree (1926). Kantoism is a philosophical theory created by a man named Emmanuel Kant. According to Emmanuel Kant or Kantism, his theory emphasizes the modern position and deals with spiritual philosophy, epistemology and ethics. In 1948, Gamou predicted that large nuclear synthetic radiation should still be filled in the universe. In Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) Emmanuel Kant German philosopher an influential, the "pure rational criticism" is tied to reason and experience, we are trying to philosophical ones. Discussions between rationalists and empiricists have left. Kant's philosophy affects future German idealists and philosophers such as Shelling and Schopenhauer. John Locke (1632-1704) Locke is a leading philosopher and political theorist who has had a great influence on generous political thought. He is believed to have several ideas like a social contract - you need to get the idea that the government is agreed by rulers. Locke also claims liberty, religious tolerance, and life and property rights. Locke is an influential figure like Jefferson, Madison, and Voltaire for those involved in the American and French revolution.

Hume's ultimate goal in his philosophical effort is to weaken the esoteric philosophy. By focusing on a rational aspect, Hume shows that philosophy has limitations. As he does not know the limit he suggests that he use as many reasons as he can, but when he comes to the border this is the limit. He doubts that we have to research reason and find something beyond reasonable capacity. Hume started his first exam by classifying its contents as perception. The ethics of Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) are in stark contrast to the ethics of David Hume (1711-1776). Hume's moral philosophical approach is experimental and empirical; Kant emphasizes the need to establish a moral foundation in transcendentalism. Hume said that the reason is just "slave of passion", while Kant establishes morality with the concept of his own concept. Hume considers the feelings of kindness and generosity as a correct moral motive and Kant saw the motive of responsibility - Hume usually regards it as the motive of second best or recession, thus giving a devotion to morality that gives special morality Uniquely represent. Value is conveyed to action. Although the moral views of Kant and Hume are hostile to each other in many ways, there is also an important relationship between them. After the break, the philosopher Emmanuel Conde started reforming metaphysics. Kant believes that metaphysics is impossible if Hume is right. However, Kant did not want to give way to Hume 's skepticism, so Kant began to criticize the possibility to explore and reform metaphysics. Kant began to criticize the quest for 'transcendental' knowledge in philosophy. Kant began looking for the "transcendental" principle that can reasonably be inferred to explain why he thinks it can not be detected. Kant believes that the only way we can get the necessary and universal thing is through 'a priori'. Kant found that the notion of causality is not the only concept to understand things 'a priori' but the metaphysics confirmed to consist completely of these concepts. (8) Kant argues that Hume 's view is that mathematical propositions are analyzed? It is totally different. ~ 1 1 If Hume uses Kant's term when discussing Hume, it means that the knowledge of mathematics is a priori! Indeed, as we learned from paragraph 2, this term is not strange for Hume; for CeUsal, Hume says. Regardless of any exception, knowledge of this relationship can not be obtained by a priori reasoning under any circumstances, but when it is found that specific objectives are often combined with each other, is. Make sure that things are presented to those with strong natural rationality and ability; if things are new to him, he will cause some cause or influence by the most accurate test of his reasonable quality You will not be able to find it either. (E 2 7) It is mathematics to rest here

Kant's seamstress 1 Kant began to distinguish between two types of knowledge, experience / rationality and form / material. Knowledge based on experience or experience contrasts with reasonable knowledge that is independent of experience. The difference between empirical knowledge and rational knowledge depends on the difference in the sources of evidence used to support two different knowledge. It is formally in contrast with material knowledge. There is no particular subject in formal knowledge; it is the general structure of thinking about every subject. By analyzing the definition of Enlightenment by Immanuel Cond and Moses Mendelssohn, this article reveals that Kant's Enlightenment interpretation is based on the concept of freedom about the ability to overcome primarily immature and inner fear I will. Especially discussing enlightenment through religion, Kant proposed two main concepts that constitute his vision - rationality of "private use" and "open use". The interpretation of Mendelssohn's enlightenment reflects the close relationship between enlightenment and culture, but the difference between "citizen's enlightenment" and "human enlightenment" by philosophers is the difference between being a citizen and being a person . Kant and Mendelssohn stuck to the public and private aspects in understanding enlightenment, but their explanation was quite different. When philosophers discussed the arrival of Age of Enlightenment, the difference between Kant and Mendelssohn was even stronger. According to Moses Mendelssohn, the enlightenment era will rarely come. Because, in the history, human beings are moving forward and backward, hindering the further development of mankind. Moses believed that individuals could gain some understanding, but the whole human race created certain limitations and laws for both religion and the state, hindering the process of enlightenment. In his analysis of understanding, Kant expressed another view; in particular, he insisted that human beings always progress in development. Philosophers acknowledge certain restrictions and obstacles, but he points out that these restrictions may only slow down the process of enlightenment, but they can not completely destroy it. In his essay "What is Enlightenment?" Immanuel Kant defines enlightenment as "the rise of mankind from the immaturity imposed by himself" (Kant, 1). In order to fully understand this definition, you first need to understand Kant's "immature" meaning. In writing, Kant defines immaturity as "you can not use your own understanding without guiding others" (Kant, 1). The famous word of Adam Smith proves what people need most in the Illuminati, namely the free market economy and the public service. In fact, Adam Smith is a Scottish economist who has an influence on the government and is trying to persuade rulers to meet the needs and needs of the people.

Although Kant's moral theory is based on Tim's argument, unless it is said that Kant's contribution is the main philosophical field is incomplete (205). He added that this was influenced by his originality, a subtle way and the difficulty of work. Timmons believes that the moral requirement is a rational requirement, which is the ideology of Kant's moral theory, therefore unethical behavior is infringement of rational behavior. Therefore, in Kant's term, moral requirements can be derived from the highest moral principles as they are regarded as rational classification commands (CI). Kant's moral theory develops mainly on the idea that ethical behavior and behavior according to reason are one thing. Because it is a reasonable agent (ie due to rationality of practice, interest and goal-oriented rationality), people are obliged to obey the prescribed moral rules for practical reasons. Otherwise it is unreasonable behavior. Kant focused on the responsibility of being a reasonable actor who knows a moral law, so Kant's theory was considered morality (from Greek's "duty" or "duty") Kant's moral theory is the core concept of autonomy. Most readers believe that Kant believes autonomy is a reasonable intention or property of an agent. In Kant's view, understanding the concept of autonomy is the key to understanding and prove that moral requirements are important to our authority. Just as Rousseau's view influences Kant, freedom is not limited by any law and is limited by some law. Therefore, the concept of freedom as autonomy exceeds the sense that it is simply "negative", that is, the sense that it is released from actions outside of you. It initially contains the concept of law developed and enacted by itself, and along with it the law with its own decisive authority This section explained Kant's view (5c) that the structure and content of Kant's moral theory (5a-b), and the beliefs of freedom, immortality of God and the soul are an inevitable "hypothesis" of practical reasons It is aimed to do. (Please refer to 7c below for the relationship between Kant's moral theory and its aesthetic theory.) Kant said, "Foundations of moral metaphysics" (1785) and "Critique of practical reasons" (" Critique "). The discussion he got from the basic work is his most famous and influential, so the following focuses on them. Kant advocated his moral theory with three major works published in the last 20 years of his life: the foundation of moral metaphysics (1785), the critique of practical reasons (1788), and Moral metaphysics (1797). First, the foundation is most influential, and our discussion on Kant 's absolute order will come mainly to the Lord. It will help to understand his influence, to understand why Kant designed the absolute command he did. In many cases, the main influence of key philosophers requires a detective. The scholar can find out where the great philosopher is educated and what kind of sentences are used in the school. They may organize the personal letter of the philosopher to arrange the book he read. They may also discover the contents of the philosopher's private library by examining his real estate sales records after his death. In the case of Kant, it is easy to find out his influence.

Immanuel Kant 1724-1804 Immanuel Kant was born in Königsberg, East Prussia on April 22, 1724. He is the son of Sadr. At the age of 8, he entered the Latin college Collegium Fredericianum, where he spent eight and a half years and studied the classics. He then entered Königsberg University in 1740 to study philosophy, mathematics and physics. His father's death stopped his university life, so he became a personal tutor. In 1755, he returned to Königsburg and later resumed his study. Emmanuel Kant - German philosopher Emmanuel Kant (1724-1804) is considered one of the founder of Western philosophy. In 1781, Kant wrote "a rational critique" that supports the idea of ​​scientific logic and rational thought methods, which makes logical thinking better than doctrine and other authoritative opinions. Bertrand Russell - British philosopher, mathematician, and Bantrand Russell (1872-1970, Episcopal Russell, 3rd) to support the scientific method of Kant believe that knowledge is "a belief consistent with facts" It was. He insists that it is not enough to believe that there is no evidence and instead should check whether there are correct and agreed supporting facts and who agrees (1926). Kantoism is a philosophical theory created by a man named Emmanuel Kant. According to Emmanuel Kant or Kantism, his theory emphasizes the modern position and deals with spiritual philosophy, epistemology and ethics. In 1948, Gamou predicted that large nuclear synthetic radiation should still be filled in the universe. Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) Emmanuel Kant is an influential German philosopher, whose "pure rational critique" ties the reasons and experiences into philosophical thought. Discussions between rationalists and empiricists have left. Kant's philosophy affects future German idealists and philosophers such as Shelling and Schopenhauer. John Locke (1632-1704) Locke is a leading philosopher and political theorist who has had a great influence on generous political thought. He is believed to have several ideas like a social contract - you need to get the idea that the government is agreed by rulers. Locke also claims liberty, religious tolerance, and life and property rights. Locke is an influential figure like Jefferson, Madison, and Voltaire for those involved in the American and French revolution.

Emmanuel Kant is known as the "father" of moral ethics. It is also known as cantism and provides a complex interpretation of morality. His philosophy embodies the submission of a person's maxim, and as long as his motive is unconditional, I think he is good whatever the external reasons. This saying is called individual's own duty or duty to individuals or others, and if it applies to all, it applies to world law. Kantoism is a philosophical theory created by a man named Emmanuel Kant. According to Emmanuel Kant or Kantism, his theory emphasizes the modern position and deals with spiritual philosophy, epistemology and ethics. In 1948, Gamou predicted that large nuclear synthetic radiation should still be filled in the universe. Immanuel Kant was born in Königsberg, East Prussia in 1724. Kant's grandfather moved from Scotland to East Prussia and even his father spelled their last name as "Cant". Kant's father was a saddle maker (craftsman), Kant was unable to go to the university. Kant's parents belong to so-called pious factions, a strict and devout Christian school, and Emanuel is strongly influenced by this kind of thinking. After graduating from college in 1746, Emmanuel Kant needs to be a mentor of wealthy family children for 9 years. Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) Emmanuel Kant is an influential German philosopher, whose "pure rational critique" ties the reasons and experiences into philosophical thought. Discussions between rationalists and empiricists have left. Kant's philosophy affects future German idealists and philosophers such as Shelling and Schopenhauer. John Locke (1632-1704) Locke is a leading philosopher and political theorist who has had a great influence on generous political thought. He is believed to have several ideas like a social contract - you need to get the idea that the government is agreed by rulers. Locke also claims liberty, religious tolerance, and life and property rights. Locke is an influential figure like Jefferson, Madison, and Voltaire for those involved in the American and French revolution. Emmanuel Kant - German philosopher Emmanuel Kant (1724-1804) is considered one of the founder of Western philosophy. In 1781, Kant wrote "a rational critique" that supports the idea of ​​scientific logic and rational thought methods, which makes logical thinking better than doctrine and other authoritative opinions. Bertrand Russell - British philosopher, mathematician, and Bantrand Russell (1872-1970, Episcopal Russell, 3rd) to support the scientific method of Kant believe that knowledge is "a belief consistent with facts" It was. He insists that it is not enough to believe that there is no evidence and instead should check whether there are correct and agreed supporting facts and who agrees (1926).

Kant has a different moral system based on reason. According to Kant, reason is a fundamental authority to determine morality. Everyone has reasoning skills, and there are two basic instructions outside this ability: command and absolute instruction. By focusing on absolute instructions, I will reveal potential relationships between reasons and responsibilities in this article. Absolute orders indicate that a series of actions must be taken due to their accuracy and necessity. Emanuel Kant's moral system was built around the sorting order. Classification order is a universal and absolute ethical standard. These orders build moral ethics, or what Kant calls "moral order". According to him, they must be applicable to all, all situations and all occasions. The decision does not change according to the situation. The order of classification is an important feature of the Kant 's order and he believes that true morality depends only on the principle of guiding action, not depending on the final result. Kant believes that morality is absolute and provable; the right thing can be determined by putting actions or maxims into the equation. Moral theory was developed by Emmanuel Kant (1724-1804). Kant believes that the ultimate outcome is not the most important, but on the contrary, what really matters is deciding the ethical intent of the decision or the action itself. Kant evaluates the morality of human behavior and ignores the result. He further believes that, regardless of the expected outcome, we have the necessary responsibilities and should not give up their responsibilities. According to Kant, these obligations are absolute and must be applied equally to everyone. Special virtues and malice are based on Kant's system of responsibility; these obligations are based on moral law, the highest principle of morality. According to Kant, the moral law highlights that it is an absolute command (CI) for incomplete and limited rational creatures such as us. Our responsibility ultimately comes from this highest ethical principle. In the basic work, Kant described in detail some of his CI statements. According to the universal rule order formula, "According to the saying that it can be a universal law at the same time" (G. 4: 421). The universal natural law formula, "The motto that appears in your action is the universal natural law through your will" (G. 4: 421). The last expression is the command itself. "So, regardless of whether it's for yourself or for someone else, it's always the last place as a use of human behavior, not just as a means" G 4: 429)

First of all, by observing the first patient, no matter whether she was a kidney or a "dead body kidney" from her father, she needed a kidney, so there was no difference. But one of the main reasons was that he was lacking in courage with fear of doing such a donation so the second patient could not agree to give up his kidney. So at the moment, there is no happiness unless the father gives up the kidneys, and there are two choices in daily life whether the daughter is a personal foundation or a professional foundation. There are difficult scenarios, or moral dilemmas. The fundamental principles of John Mill's utilitarianism and Emanuel Kant's moral metaphysics suggest different views of the two philosophers about the field of moral philosophy. Compared to Kant 's metaphysical segmentation and its use in proof of validity and error, Mill' s utilitarianism is a more sophisticated ethical theory. Kant takes his confirmation of metaphysical survival as discipline of his moral philosophy. If the law has moral power it will be the foundation. Emmanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill are philosophers who solve moral problems from the way moral tradition is formed. Immanuel Kant advocated a viewpoint on "fundamentals of moral metaphysics" based on his idea that human values ​​are inherent in his reasoning ability. John Stuart Mill has a different perspective like what is mentioned in this Utilitarianism which seems to contradict Kant 's idea. The most outstanding aspect of ethics is the concept of responsibility to a specific individual. According to Kant and Mill, moral obligations are rooted in universal moral principles, so they are fundamentally not specific in this regard. Both Mil and Kant are philosophers who have had a great influence on their particular philosophical field and their theoretical arguments help them to better understand them and their theory I can do it.

The problem of euthanasia is a controversial matter. Here we will look at the discussion on euthanasia of Emmanuel Kant and John Stewart Mill and the moral system of how each philosopher responds to this discussion. Because Emmanuel Kant and John Stewart Mill have different ethics, they treat euthanasia in a different way. Immanuel Kant holds morality in morality or duty theory. This means that for those with moral value it must be done from responsibility. Kant explains that the basis for this view is absolute, "It is based solely on the saying that you can make it a universal law at the same time" (412). John Stuartmir's "practical" ethical theory and Immanuel Kant's "sorting order" ethical theory. According to utilitarianism, euthanasia is morally justified, and according to Kantism, euthanasia is morally irrational; however, I lead these two positions to their particular position Argued that it is due to a large defect inherent in inference. There is no suitable solution to this problem. According to Utilitarianism, morality is mainly of the kind ... the theory behind Utilitarianism is that if the it does not promote happiness or joy, the behavior of a person that it is wrong promotes happiness and happiness This is the case. The point of this theory is the principle of utility, "maximum happiness to the people who should be the most". (Palmer) Jeremy Bentham basically brought it to the name of Utilitarianism. I pay more attention than those before him The fundamental principles of John Mill's utilitarianism and Emanuel Kant's moral metaphysics suggest different views of the two philosophers about the field of moral philosophy. Compared to Kant 's metaphysical segmentation and its use in proof of validity and error, Mill' s utilitarianism is a more sophisticated ethical theory. Kant takes his confirmation of metaphysical survival as discipline of his moral philosophy. If the law has moral power it will be the foundation.

Kant: The metaphysical interpretation of space explains and evaluates the best argument Kant thinks of his "metaphysical game of space" (B 37 - 40). Things (concept of Leibnizian). In other words, he insisted that the space must be in an (at least) intuitive form. Both of his arguments suggest that the space is not a Newton or Leibniz but a mere intuition. We may return to Leibniz 's initial explanation of time and space position criticism, which appeared before Kantt started the metaphysical space fair. He asked about the spacetime: "They just decide whether they are things, but will they belong to things even if they are not intuitive?" (A 23 / B 38). This may indicate that Kant thought Leibniz people thought that space and time had "absolute reality". Perhaps he meant that for Leibniz, space has reality that does not depend on intuition, or that space exists independently of instinct itself. But then, what does this idea explain in more detail? Kant explains two things about space and time: metaphysics and transcendental. Metaphysical details of space and time focus on clarifying how these intuitions are known independently of experience. A priori discussion tries to show how to apply metaphysical conclusions to enrich our understanding. In transcendental discourse, Kant reminds me of his metaphysical details. If space and time are not pure transcendental instincts, science will be impossible. He asks the reader to accept the proposition "I can not put space or put numbers on two lines" and then attempts to derive this proposition from the concepts of the second and the second line. His conclusion is that it is totally impossible (A 47 - 48 / B 65) Kant 's metaphysical exposition of the so - called spatial concept presents the first argument of transcendental aesthetics. Kant defines the concept of "explanation" as follows. "I understand what concepts are through (if not clear) detailed explanations. (A23 / B38) Through the concept of this context (Begriff), I simply want to express the form of expressions I use Kant 1. The universe is not an empirical concept derived from external experience

The pursuit of life, freedom, and happiness is an indication that everyone should enjoy basic freedom. The fact that people have reasoning abilities requires autonomy. Inference will help the world move towards an ideal society. We claim that humans are independent from other animal species using reason. Because he can choose his own way of life, human thought creates all the differences. However, this natural gift brings negative factors that everyone must face. For philosophers like Spinoza and Emmanuel Kant, "freedom of speech" means freedom of knowledge to participate mainly in exchange discussions opened. In 1784, five years before the French Revolution, Kant argued that "freedom to openly use their reasons" is a basic and equal right of everyone or citizen. Likewise, when Mill wrote "freedom" less than a century ago, he defended freedom of speech, defended the "Freedom of Thought and Discussion" as an individual and pursued the truth. To these thinkers, the freedom of equal isigoria is still essential, but their attention is not limited to actual remarks, ie participation in solving and discussing other physical actions, reasonable psychological exercises and ideas and arguments We will move on to the exchange of. , Often printing There are two kinds freely. Freedom (negative freedom) and freedom (positive freedom). The division of freedom into this binary framework can be traced back to Kant, which he at least described in detail in his 1941 work "Escape from Freedom" at Isaiah Berlin's 1958 paper "Two Freedoms". It is known for concepts and explores Charles Taylor more modernly. These philosophers and thinkers often use these two different freedoms to discuss and discuss the role of government in civic life. But today, we would like to explore ways to think about the difference between freedom and freedom. It will help us to better understand our personal development and travel from boys to men. Kant has many reasons to believe that freedom is essential to morality. First of all, freedom is essential for moral responsibility. For example, when we are responsible for personal behavior against accusations, we avoid "such behavior" and "condemn" to condemn the individual against not properly exercising this ability To do. "We must judge that judgment of condemnation is based on the law of reason, that it can treat it as ... and should judge that the behavior of the person is not the cause" (A 555 / B 583). Second, Kant believes that "moral law immediately determines the will" is essential for moral behavior (Proverbs 5:71). As Hume said, if the will of a man must be required by her situation and experience, the moral law requires that Hume respond appropriately because it requires that Hume does not support pure thought and motivation It is impossible. This is the true cornerstone of Kant's moral thought (Guyer 2000: 203)

When comparing Kant and Mill's work, the lack of Kant and Mill uses reason as the ultimate benefit that wisdom (using Kant's term) and general understanding and certainty, as Mill said. I expressed my idea. Although the two political philosophers are trying to achieve the same goal, they eventually showed that they achieved the goal in different ways and ultimately mean that the goal is slightly different. The way to Muruton's certainty and understanding depends on various opinions, is an asymptotic approach to the truth, clearly described by Kant, like the end of an individual on a straight road It will never reach full enlightenment. Comparative papers focus on similarities between papers. For example, you may be asked to reasonably compare the roles of Kant and Mill. So let's explain the similarities between the two in this article. On the other hand, contrast and paper differ in contrast and opinion between the two writers, but what is the difference between the two? It is normal for your professor to ask you to write one, but I apologize for how confused this is, they usually mean both. The best way is to ask what the professor is seeking. When comparing Kant and Mill's idea, I learned that Mill's work is more reasonable. When thinking about various definitions of morality in society, I find Kant's view that we are hard to accept morality through rationality and morality. Mill is building his idea on a very simple idea that humans seek happiness and try to avoid suffering; therefore, your actions provide the greatest pleasure for most people If you are, you are moral. Kant argues that he is not opposed to happiness, but I think it is far more important than responsibility. Compare the ethic theory of mills and Kant; this will make the social order better. John Stuart Mill (1808-73) believed that moral theory is called Utilitarianism. There are many expressions in this theory. One of them is that "Everyone acts like this and makes all participants balance the utmost good and evil." But good is a relative term. what would you like. Utilitarians are opposed to this problem. Mill distinguishes between happiness and pure sensory pleasure. - Emmanuel Kant's "foundation of moral metaphysics" and John Stuart Mill's utilitarian Emmanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill are both philosophers, they are moral and they form a traditional form It solves moral problems. Immanuel Kant presented an argument to "the foundation of moral metaphysics" based on his belief that human value is inherent in inferring ability.

Kant and Mill's Theory In July 1994, a former Presbyterian pastor Paul J. Hill was killed by abortion doctor John Britton and a volunteer James Barrett outside the clinic. It was shown. Pensacola in Florida. Prior to this, Hill commented on the murder of another abortion doctor, Dr. David Ganger, pointed out that this is "Biblical Scripture Murder" (p. 215). This statement shows how strong Hill's faith is, and makes people feel that they do not regret Britton and Barrett's murder. When Kant holds the theory of rationalism, Mill has an empirical theory. Kant is morally ethical in the form he believes, it is necessary for practical judgment of freedom and reason. Utilitarian theory of Miller is a kind of resultism. Because the correctness and badness of behavior depends on the outcome. Kant's pure ethics is the basis of his absolute command and provides the basis for his theory of universal duty. Utilitarian theory of Miller is the main form of resultantism The fundamental principles of John Mill's utilitarianism and Emanuel Kant's moral metaphysics suggest different views of the two philosophers about the field of moral philosophy. Compared to Kant 's metaphysical segmentation and its use in proof of validity and error, Mill' s utilitarianism is a more sophisticated ethical theory. Kant takes his confirmation of metaphysical survival as discipline of his moral philosophy. If the law has moral power it will be the foundation. John Stuart Mill and Jeremy Bentham are recognized as founder of Utilitarianism. Contrary to Kant 's moral theory, Utilitarians oppose the majority of Kant' s theory. Kant believes that the intention of action should be regarded as moral or immoral, but J.S Mill and Bentham will say that this is the result of actions actually determining ethics. Mueller tried to solve the battle between good and evil through moral theory based on "Utilitarianism" theory, "the greatest happiness for most people". Mill thinks that behavior is proportional to the amount of morally correct or created happiness. He defines happiness as happy and painless and believes that happiness is the sole basis of morality.

Kant's Maxim says, "Neither one nor the other always acts to deal with humans, not just a purpose, not just a means." Kant's views are directly related, and they all come to mind at the same time. The first is "rationality of the final proving means" and "what can not be proved to be a possible means". Study these two views related to Kant's saying and discuss issues of suicide assistance, euthanasia, death penalty and the use of people for our own purposes. In order to understand Kant's moral philosophy, we need to explain some terms and assumptions. First, Kant believes that we will take actions whenever we make a decision. Maxim is Kant's intentional version. They are personal principles that guide us in our decisions. All of our decisions have some sayings and other principles behind them. Second, moral is a set of principles applied to all people and applied to all. Third, Kant said the ability for us to make choices and decisions is 'will.' He believes that our will is reasonable, that is, it can be chosen based on reason. It is not just acting instinctively. We can act according to your choice, we can think about what to choose with inference The philosophy of the great German philosopher Immanuel Kant in the late 1700s was the foundation of almost all philosophical development since then. Kant's philosophy is called Critical Philosophy or Transcendental Philosophy. Hume's skeptical philosophy spurred Kant's attempt to achieve a combination of rationalism and empiricism. In his "critique of pure reason" (1781), Kant will provide a critical explanation for the power and limitations of human reasons to determine what is known and what is not known will do. Kant's conclusion is that reasoning only provides knowledge about what we see and not about things themselves. Kant believes that not only the facts of the facts presented by the senses but also the mind plays an active role in understanding. Ideas do this through basic categories or understanding These categories or forms of understanding are independent of experience. Emmanuel Kant (1724-1804) German philosopher. Kant's "critique of pure reason" tries to combine reason from experiences between reason and empiricism to experience and to remove philosophy. Kant's philosophy affects future German idealists and philosophers such as Shelling and Schopenhauer. Thomas Paine (1737-1809) British and American writers and political activists. He is an avid supporter of American independence. Pain wrote many articles to support Republican ideals. This had a major impact on the revolution in America and France. The noteworthy works are as follows. Human rights (1791)

Whether humans really have free will or whether their lives are completely decided is decided. This free will problem continues to be a place of philosophical debate forever. Many great philosophers tried to answer this question, but none of them answered as much as Immanuel Kant. He put the foundation of his argument in the foreword of the future metaphysics. In response to David Hume 's skepticism, Kant wrote this method, so Kant made a more resolute attempt to metaphysics. Thus, Kant 's irrationalism in its formulation was a combination of sentimentalism and Kant' s non conceptualism applicable to Kant 's practical agent theory. Or, in other words, for Kant, free choice and autonomy will come not only from the minds of human being but also from the mind, understanding or intelligence, and as long as they come from the human mind, they can come directly from the heart, not indirectly It is as much as possible. Concept, conscious consideration, mediation by propositional reasoning or reasoning Reasonable human condition 3, deep freedom and real people: metaphysical studies, Section 3.3 - Practice - Freedom of Life: Kant non-intellectualism Kant believes that there are no exceptions in the responsibility of not lying for two main reasons. Kant believes that human beings include dignity and essential value, free will and moral behavior. The reason why Kant does not tell a lie is based on his view on the intrinsic value of man and the free will. The first is about how the lies will affect ourselves and the second reason is about how the lies will affect others. First, Kant believes that when people tell a lie they are violating their dignity and intrinsic value (Rachels & Rachels, 2011, pp. 137-138). A lie conflicts with his moral, moral, and essential values. Furthermore, lying is likely to be influenced by liars, so it may hinder the ability to make reasonable choices about free will. Kant opened the third part by defining the will as the reason for our action. Kant believes that having will and reason is one thing, and having free will mean having the will to be influenced by external forces. This is a negative definition of freedom - we are telling us that freedom is freedom determined by foreign powers. But Kant also advocates a positive definition of freedom. Kant believes that free will give him certain laws - it sets its own purpose and has special causal power to achieve them. Free will is the intention that ordinary natural laws can achieve their actions in a different way than doing things. According to Kant, law is necessary to act. Actions not based on law are arbitrary, and we can not call motivation. Because free will is not only driven by external forces, external forces will not provide laws for free will.

Every era has created its own hero. Until the time of Enstein until the time that the St. Empire, St. Thomas and Roger Bacon forever and with the modern creator - Edison created Aristotle, Hercules and Alexander the Great from the glorious day of ancient Greece, I created the ideal image of the best expression. Formally, Kant is an ideological opponent of a reasonable genius Newton that makes knowledge and thought exist at the level of God. The key text of Spivak's literary analysis is Kant's critical judgment (1790), which is his third critique after criticizing pure reason (1781) and practical rational criticism (1788) . In Spikek's view, these three criticisms constitute a cultural self-expression of the ability to judge Western aesthetics. However, she discovered the slip is the third criticism, which shows that Kant needed to remove the blockade of "information informers" in order to integrate this western self. Spivak described this slip as "a moment when it can not be recognized, it is called a native information provider." To better understand this final statement, you need to know how Spivak uses the term "closed". As described in "Psychoanalysis of Language" (1974), she borrowed the term "boycott" from the meaning of psychoanalysis, Lacan. Rakan, as far as he concerns, In the first criticism there is only a hint of the form taken by Kant's moral theory. The practical rationality of "basic metaphysics" (1785) and "critique of practical reasons" (1788) is completely new. Kant argues that he now found the highest principle of practical reasons he calls classification. (To put it more precisely, this principle is essential for those who have needs and trends like us and are completely indispensable for people who are not reasonable.) As we all know, Kant finds some of this principle Offer different expressions. The first of these is as follows: "Only the sayings that you can make it a universal rule at the same time" (4: 421). (For Kant 's different versions, we claim that Kant is equivalent, see Kant' s moral philosophy, §§ 5 - 9. In order to broadly understand Kant's theory of freedom, I will list some arguments about Kant's reason and freedom of criticism for pure reasons, the foundation of moral metaphysics, and criticism for practical reasons. But before I do, I would like to mention some aspects of his view, but I will not discuss in these contexts. One is Kant (Will and Wilkure) (after at least the second critique), the difference in the functions of the two aspects or the will system (MM 6: 213-14, 226). Will is a legislative aspect and through will, a reasonable existence will give our own law; Kant recognizes will for purely practical reasons. It itself is neither free nor free. Willkür is the execution side or function of a will, it is considered a free side

Happiness The philosopher of the 19th century John Stuart Muller has correctly asserted its pursuit, but essentially this kind of emotion is still the ultimate goal. By maintaining the concept of enjoyment as happiness and all other values ​​as well as the ultimate destination, Muller's hedonistic view accurately and reasonably determines natural and human tendencies, and The important thing is that happiness is the most important dream. Emmanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill are philosophers who have solved moral problems in terms of the formation of moral habits. Immanuel Kant advocated a point of view "based on his belief that human value is inherent in his reasonable skill" the basis of moral metaphysics ". John Stuart Miller is thinking ... Show more ... Muller is opposed to "Human complaints are more satisfying than pigs", which is an animal's meaning of human dissatisfaction I am satisfied with the degree of satisfaction, more specifically, "better Socrates is not satisfied with foolish satisfaction." This means that an idiot has only a different opinion, as he does not know the two aspects of the problem. This sentence means that Mill dismissed the concept of "happiness", replaced it with the concept of "happy and painless" and replaced the concept of "misfortune" with the concept of "lack of pain and pleasure" . Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill vs. Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill, two confrontational philosophers. Even if they live in different countries, their work is opposite. Kant pointed out that there is nothing other than just wanting goodwill in his book "Foundations of Moral Metaphysics". - Compare Mill and Kant's ethical theory; this will make the social order better. John Stuart Mill (1808-73) believed that moral theory is called Utilitarianism. There are many expressions in this theory. One of them is that "Everyone acts like this and makes all participants balance the utmost good and evil." But good is a relative term. what would you like. Utilitarians are opposed to this problem. Mill to distinguish between happiness and pure sensory pleasure The writing by John Stuart Mill and Emmanuel Kant shows a very different perspective on moral issues. Mill's idea is called Utilitarianism. In this ideology it is a fundamental belief that happiness is the greatest goal and action should be judged by the ability to provide maximum happiness to most people. The dentist Kant believes that this is not the result of action, but the behavior itself. He insists on reasonable moral rules

The geopolitical Kant of the colonial era occupies a certain position in contemporary literary theory, especially post colonial theory. On the other hand, the Enlightenment Project is seen as a universal force (with absolute universality of Western form). For example, he states as follows. "Cultural experience or any cultural form is a basic and typical mixture.If Imannon Kande has isolated the cultural and aesthetic fields from the secular world, Western practice is now the time to recombine them I came ("Associating Empire with Secular Interpretation", CA 58). (1) The first question concerns the positioning of Kant's transition to colonialism. Most readers may take Kant's critical comment on colonial practices in his view "Metaphysics of Moral Metaphysics and Permanent Peace". However, as introductions and contributions by Pauline Kleingeld and Lea Ypi show, Kant does not always have such a critical view. Early comments on his critical times about colonialism and slavery are at best neutral at most, and believe that these practices are acceptable even at the moment necessary in the course of cultural and historical progress I suggested that it was. Within the global historical concept (1784), Kant argues that if there is no marginal distance, the possibility that part of the "our" world ultimately will provide law to all other parts of the world There was. In other places he stated without clear criticism of colonial rule and slavery. Colonialism is only a talk of Kant's work, but his comments on the legitimacy or illegality of colonial practices naturally attracted a lot of attention. Since Kant is the leading representative of enlightenment and also the pioneer of liberation theory, his seeming colonialism support and criticism seems to have widespread impact. Enlightenment may be an accomplice or, on the contrary, a person who provides resources to overcome the oppression of the colonial era. This volume does not directly address the broader problem of general relations between enlightenment and colonialism but rather shifts to a clearer understanding of Kant's practical position on colonialism . It focuses on 4 issues

As Emanuel Kant once said, "All our knowledge begins with a sensation, then begins with understanding, and starts with reason." Our feelings are an integral part of our lives. Our senses allow us to access information from the environment to learn, evaluate and understand our environment. Perception is defined as "the ability of the body to perceive visual, olfactory, auditory, auditory, tasteful and tactile sensations of external stimuli" (theoryofknowledge.net). It is intertwined with knowledge in all fields. In Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) Emmanuel Kant German philosopher an influential, the "pure rational criticism" is tied to reason and experience, we are trying to philosophical ones. Discussions between rationalists and empiricists have left. Kant's philosophy affects future German idealists and philosophers such as Shelling and Schopenhauer. John Locke (1632-1704) Locke is a leading philosopher and political theorist who has had a great influence on generous political thought. He is believed to have several ideas like a social contract - you need to get the idea that the government is agreed by rulers. Locke also claims liberty, religious tolerance, and life and property rights. Locke is an influential figure like Jefferson, Madison, and Voltaire for those involved in the American and French revolution. Emmanuel Kant - German philosopher Emmanuel Kant (1724-1804) is considered one of the founder of Western philosophy. In 1781, Kant is better than the opinion that a certain doctrine or other authority logical thinking, wrote a "reasonable criticism" to support the idea of ​​scientific logic and rational way of thinking. Bertrand Russell - British philosopher, mathematician, and Bertrand Russell (1872-1970, the third generation Russell Earl Russell Earl) to support the scientific method of Kant, knowledge is believed to be the "belief that consistent with the fact." It was. He claims that there is not enough just to believe that there is no evidence, but instead, whether there is a fact support that is accurate agreement, and Who should check whether to agree (1926).

Dorothea thinks Casaubon is very smart, and I think she can learn a lot from him. Therefore, she decided to marry him. But this marriage made her feel wasted. I found that Casabon is stingy and selfish. He takes an authoritative attitude and sometimes becomes almost arrogant. In addition, he treats Dorothy in an authoritarian way. He is restrictive and irritated by Dorothy. She controls her feelings in her married life. This is a marriage far from happiness. In Chapter 48, the health of Casona got worse. Asking your friends about what morality means to your friends may give you different answers. You may hear answers to religious, legal or other ethically correct answers. The ethical framework should not consider emotional, religious, legal, scientific and cultural influences when judging whether the list of things you must do is ethical It suggests. Here is what you think about doing moral reasoning, utilitarianism, best or least damage John Stuartmir's "practical" ethical theory and Immanuel Kant's "sorting order" ethical theory. According to utilitarianism, euthanasia is morally justified, and according to Kantism, euthanasia is morally irrational; however, I lead these two positions to their particular position Argued that it is due to a large defect inherent in inference. There is no suitable solution to this problem. According to Utilitarianism, morality is mainly of the kind ... the theory behind Utilitarianism is that if the it does not promote happiness or joy, the behavior of a person that it is wrong promotes happiness and happiness This is the case. The point of this theory is the principle of utility, "maximum happiness to the people who should be the most". (Palmer) Jeremy Bentham basically brought it to the name of Utilitarianism. I pay more attention than those before him

Wrong, or wrong behavior in my own discussion of the elements to justify, I philosopher with two most influential, to quote Emmanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill. In order to make this article easier to understand, I will focus on one of the discussions formed by each person. I will evaluate how the principle of Kant and Mill applies to correct ethics and wrong ethics. Kant gave a motivating absolute instructions to act only as a general method to people in our (Kant), and the action because the mills tend to promote happiness because there is a tendency that they produce happiness He said he was right. Reversal Emmanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill are philosophers who have solved moral problems in terms of the formation of moral habits. Immanuel Kant advocated a point of view "based on his belief that human value is inherent in his reasonable skill" the basis of moral metaphysics ". John Stuart Miller is thinking ... Show more ... Muller is opposed to "Human complaints are more satisfying than pigs", which is an animal's meaning of human dissatisfaction I am satisfied with the degree of satisfaction, more specifically, "better Socrates is not satisfied with foolish satisfaction." This means that an idiot has only a different opinion, as he does not know the two aspects of the problem. This sentence means that Mill dismissed the concept of "happiness", replaced it with the concept of "happy and painless" and replaced the concept of "misfortune" with the concept of "lack of pain and pleasure" . Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill vs. Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill, two confrontational philosophers. Even if they live in different countries, their work is opposite. Kant pointed out that there is nothing other than just wanting goodwill in his book "Foundations of Moral Metaphysics". - Compare Mill and Kant's ethical theory; this will make the social order better. John Stuart Mill (1808-73) believed that moral theory is called Utilitarianism. There are many expressions in this theory. One of them is that "Everyone acts like this and makes all participants balance the utmost good and evil." But good is a relative term. what would you like. Utilitarians are opposed to this problem. Mill to distinguish between happiness and pure sensory pleasure Classical utilitarianism is an ethical theoretical approach introduced by philosophers Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill. A scholar like Immanuel Kant of "legal philosophy" in front of them regards punishment as a moral obligation. Kant believes that sanctions are not for the promotion of good but for direct punishment of perpetrators. Classical utilitarianism also shifts the point of punishment to its purpose and result. Based on the Utilitarian approach, sanctions can be justified if sanctions can bring the greatest benefit to most people. Punishment is reasonable if you can prevent you from creating public safety from crime.

Expressionism and opposition to realism - Kant, Davidson and Roti (1) Abstract: The concept of expressionism and anti-expression is introduced in the discussion of contemporary philosophy of Richard Drotti to explain him and the new pragmatism I was wrong. Attitudes towards traditional epistemological problems Roti means that the history of philosophy indicates that there is no final answer to traditional knowledge, truth, and representation; therefore, they are rejected It should be. Richard Rorty argued that contemporary analytical philosophy in a philosophical and natural mirror inadvertently imitates scientific methods. In addition, he condemns traditional epistemological viewpoint of expressionism and its corresponding theory, which depends on knowledge and independence of observer phenomena and passivity of natural phenomena and consciousness. As a supporter of anti-fundamentalism and anti-essentialism in the framework of pragmatism, he responded to postmodernism of traditionalism and relativism, but he responded to most postmodern ideas and his social liberalism I opposed the commitment. This 144 page book has a title that may lead people to introductory, but while summarizing McIntyre 's theme, the author also considers other philosophers such as Donald Davidson, especially Richard Roti Use. In order to understand McIntyre's idea, readers unfamiliar with Davidson and Rorty may find it difficult to understand this material. These essays are very broad, including a paper on the concept of justice in MacIntyre, an explanation of his liberalism, his interpretation of Aquinas, and criticism of his Enlightenment. The last chapter is written by MacIntyre himself; entitled "Partial Response to My Critics", it provides McIntyre's response to some of the criticism raised by other authors. (Motivation to interact with McKintal's critics is rare and worthy of praise) From Peirce and James to Rorty and Davidson, pragmatists have sought empiricism to purify Descartes' remains. For example, they claim that empiricism deprives the spiritual understanding Rock, Berkeley, and Hume inherited from Descartes. According to this Cartesianism, thinking is completely subjective and private that its content of "thinking" or "impression" is irrevocable, completely separated from the objective world being publicized when they express ing. . Accepting this world of mind, experientists have to face the long series of difficult questions - loneliness, skepticism, realism, idealism -.

Kant and causation Introduction Criticizing the pure reason, Kant pointed out that "every change will occur according to the law of causality." 1 This statement is interpreted in two different ways: weak reading and strong reading. A weaker reading basically indicates that Kant's statement only means that "all events have a cause"; however, a strong reading is "a second analogism is caused not only by causality but also by causality It is also dedicated ". The difference is to pay attention to the difference between Kant's empirical natural law and universal transcendence. principle Kant called real things "all that can be achieved by freedom" and purely practical laws never given through perceptual conditions resemble the universal law of causality It is a moral law. The reason is that we can only give "rule of practical freedom through sensation", but the pure practice rules given by reasonable a priori determine "what to do". In the "critique of practical reasons" at the end of the second main part of the analysis, Kant introduced categories of freedom as well as categories that understood the real counterparts. Kant's liberal category is clearly predominantly a condition of the possibility of action (i) free, (ii) understood to be free, (iii) morally appreciated It is really important to distinguish between the general principle of Cant's causality and the specific causality determined in the second analogy. Equally important, Kant's specific causal relationship is a comprehensive post-incident rather than a comprehensive pre-case (at least in most cases). However, it does not mean that Kant agrees with Hume as to the status of synthetic post - causal law. Conversely, Kant said (as we have seen) Prolegomena, paragraph 29 (he made his official "Hume answer") has only a fundamental difference between "heuristics" Clearly stated. The illuminance of the sun and the true objective law (the sun is the light that passes through it and the cause of the heat) is derived by adding an a priori concept that is due to a simple induction law. In this case (A 91 / B 124):

Emmanuel Kant defines enlightenment as "the rise of mankind from his immaturity" in his essay "What is enlightenment?" (Kant, 1). In order to fully understand this definition, you first need to understand Kant's "immature" meaning. In writing, Kant defines immaturity as "you can not use your own understanding without guiding others" (Kant, 1). In addition, Kant believes that this immaturity is self-determination and believes that the lack of courage and determination to think of himself is a personal negligence, but let others think and understand. What is enlightenment? Since the German philosopher Emanuel Conde initially raised this question in 1784, this question has generated countless answers in the past two and half and a half centuries. According to the history of the Kantian period, from the 17th century to the 18th century, human growth in intellectual maturity. Through emphasis on scientific research and rational discussion, Kant et al. Can finally think of human beings not by relying on the authority of the church, the Greek philosopher, or other sources revealing the truth I assert. Immanuel Kant explains in his article "What is Enlightenment?" Describes the nature of Enlightenment and how it is generally communicated. According to Kant, "Enlightenment is the liberation of man from self-monitoring." Through this, Kant means that enlightenment refers to those who can use his understanding without the guidance of other people. Kant believes that the age of enlightenment is an era in which human society is released from the essence of liberation. However, Kant pointed out that we were born again as a guardian when we were young, and it was okay. Furthermore, we should revitalize our rational capacity after releasing this need naturally. Kant 's revelation advances society through free activities of rational thought and intellectual evaluation. In the age of enlightenment, the public will be able to manage the freedom they give. However, Kant argues that we live in "the age of enlightenment", not living in "the age of enlightenment". Through this statement, he means that the age of enlightenment will be the era when we overcome all self-monitoring. Also in his article, Kant distinguishes official and private rationality. He said, "The reason for the public use of a person must always be free, it can only bring human understanding." In doing so, the author wishes to make progress on public use of the reason I believe that. Kant believes that rational personal use is considered to be "a specific civil status placed on him or a reason to use it in the workplace."

Whether humans really have free will or whether their lives are completely decided is decided. This free will problem continues to be a place of philosophical debate forever. Many great philosophers tried to answer this question, but none of them answered as much as Immanuel Kant. He put the foundation of his argument in the foreword of the future metaphysics. In response to David Hume 's skepticism, Kant wrote this method, so Kant made a more resolute attempt to metaphysics. The philosophy of the great German philosopher Immanuel Kant in the late 1700s was the foundation of almost all philosophical development since then. Kant's philosophy is called Critical Philosophy or Transcendental Philosophy. Hume's skeptical philosophy spurred Kant's attempt to achieve a combination of rationalism and empiricism. In his "critique of pure reason" (1781), Kant tried to provide a critical explanation of the power and limitations of human reasons to decide what is known and what is not known I will. Kant's conclusion is that reasoning only provides knowledge about what we see and not about things themselves. Kant believes that not only the facts of the facts presented by the senses but also the mind plays an active role in understanding. Ideas do this through basic categories or understanding These categories or forms of understanding are independent of experience. Emmanuel Kant (1724-1804) German philosopher. Kant's "critique of pure reason" tries to combine reason from experiences between reason and empiricism to experience and to remove philosophy. Kant's philosophy affects future German idealists and philosophers such as Shelling and Schopenhauer. Thomas Paine (1737-1809) British and American writers and political activists. He is an avid supporter of American independence. Pain wrote many articles to support Republican ideals. This had a major impact on the revolution in America and France. The noteworthy works are as follows. Human rights (1791) Philosophy of the 1800s. Kant's philosophy stimulated various ideologies such as G. W. F. Hegel and Karl Marx in Germany during the 1800's. Hegel has developed a theory of historical change called the dialectic. There, the conflicting conflict led to the creation of a new unity, and it led to the opposite. Hegel 's theory was transformed into dialectical materialism by Marx. Marx believes that only material things are genuine. He said that all ideas are based on the economy. He believes that dialectics of conflict between capitalists and industrial workers will lead to the establishment of communism, he calls it social and political systems.

Kant said that freedom and reason in Kant's moral can not be regarded as a set of rules that define the necessary means to achieve a specific purpose and must be followed without consideration of the result . The premise that the target object is used as a determinant of will can not produce a moral law; that is, when the will is materially determined its moral problem is not so. Appears. In order to broadly understand Kant's theory of freedom, I will list some arguments about Kant's reason and freedom of criticism for pure reasons, the foundation of moral metaphysics, and criticism for practical reasons. But before I do, I would like to mention some aspects of his view, but I will not discuss in these contexts. One is Kant (Will and Wilkure) (after at least the second critique), the difference in the functions of the two aspects or the will system (MM 6: 213-14, 226). Will is a legislative aspect and through will, a reasonable existence will give our own law; Kant recognizes will for purely practical reasons. It itself is neither free nor free. Willkür is the execution side or function of a will, it is considered a free side In addition to deriving his best moral principles, the most difficult questions about Kant's rationality practice focus on his freedom relationship. A rough overview is consistent, but the view on Kant's subject matter seems to be more than usual in his critical research. (See Kant's moral philosophy by Ellison in 1990, chapter 10, short sketches, and skilled, but undisputable statements.) Interaction with unconditional practice rules "mutually implicit" ( 5: 29 f) Meanwhile, freedom means that practical reasons may be pure (non-organized, unconditional). From the perspective of our moral support, we must be free. Freedom plays a central role in Kant's ethics, as the possibility of moral judgment presupposes it. Freedom is a rational concept with essential practical functions. Without the assumption of freedom, reason can not act. If we believe that we are totally determined by causality and that we are not the reason not to lead ourselves, then any rule attempting to assume a means of achieving a specific purpose is meaningless. I do not think I will completely obey the law of causality and I can act according to the concept of the principle that leads my wish. We can not help, if we want to take action, achieve our goal and understand the world, we can not help but I think that our actions are the result of the unresolved cause.

Immanuel Kant opened up the path of the current moral thinkers, being one of the most important philosophers in contemporary Europe and thought to be an important part of philosophical thinking. He paved the way for philosophers and social behavioral scientists like Piaget. Kant's theory depends on his details on his autonomy and his absolute leadership. Kant believes in autonomy, but he knew that autonomy was flawed, he created absolute orders. Autonomy allows us to create ourselves in terms of our values ​​and ethics. Emmanuel Kant - German philosopher Emmanuel Kant (1724-1804) is considered one of the founder of Western philosophy. In 1781, Kant wrote "a rational critique" that supports the idea of ​​scientific logic and rational thought methods, which makes logical thinking better than doctrine and other authoritative opinions. Bertrand Russell - British philosopher, mathematician, and Bantrand Russell (1872-1970, Episcopal Russell, 3rd) to support the scientific method of Kant believe that knowledge is "a belief consistent with facts" It was. He insists that it is not enough to believe that there is no evidence and instead should check whether there are correct and agreed supporting facts and who agrees (1926). Kantoism is a philosophical theory created by a man named Emmanuel Kant. According to Emmanuel Kant or Kantism, his theory emphasizes the modern position and deals with spiritual philosophy, epistemology and ethics. In 1948, Gamou predicted that large nuclear synthetic radiation should still be filled in the universe. Immanuel Kant was born in Königsberg, East Prussia in 1724. Kant's grandfather moved from Scotland to East Prussia and even his father spelled their last name as "Cant". Kant's father was a saddle maker (craftsman), Kant was unable to go to the university. Kant's parents belong to so-called pious factions, a strict and devout Christian school, and Emanuel is strongly influenced by this kind of thinking. After graduating from college in 1746, Emmanuel Kant needs to be a mentor of wealthy family children for 9 years. German philosophers Immanuel Kant and Karl Marx's work played an important role in the development of different philosophical religious sects. Emmanuel Kant was born in Königsberg, East Prussia in 1724. Currently, Kaliningrad is a poor household with the reverence of eleven children. Through his study, it is clear that Kant was promoted in the value of religious doctrine and faith, as his theory shows the significant influence of his religious education. Kant is accustomed to being a little boy

I discussed the philosophical significance of Kant's great cosmology in 1755 as "the natural history of the universe". I will discuss how Kant 's interest in Newton' s space powers led to confirm the special version of physics influx theory. Kant's guess about living on other planets as it points out that the important feature of Kant's physics influx theory, the 'flexible movement of the body' is a necessary condition for the possibilities of knowledge It is very important. In general, Kant believes that if it can recognize a deductive principle that the knowledge system can "present intuitively" (4: 471) with a mathematical description, it can only count as science in a truly meaning It is. Therefore, Kant is pessimistic about the possibility that empirical psychology is equivalent to true science. Kant thought that "chemistry is merely systematic art or experimental doctrine, not an appropriate science" (4: 471). Kant's interest in physics theory began very soon. His first work, "A Consideration on the Real Estimation of Vigor" (1749) is the exploration of some basic problems in physics, and it is about how to go about between Leibniz and Descartes Enter "visualization". "(" Energetic ") argument. Quantify the power to move objects (in most cases Kant supports Leibniz) Kant began to investigate purely "transcendental" reasons by establishing his criticisms. He said that there is a boundary and contents. He began looking for restrictions on internal and external content. Kant studied three knowledge systems, mathematics, physical science, metaphysics. Kant said that science must be necessary and universal. This makes mathematics and science reasonable. Kant first broke down judgment into two types of knowledge: analysis and integration. In Prolegomena, Kant criticizes Hume as a mathematical judgment. If he realized this Before Kant, all previous knowledge was thought to have to be analytical. However, Kant believes our mathematical knowledge, the first principles of natural science and metaphysics are a priori and inclusive. Kant believes that the unique nature of this knowledge needs to be urgently explained. Therefore, the core question of criticism is to answer this question: "How is it possible to synthesize a priori judgment?"

What is his normative and mandatory concept by replacing "state of nature" with Hobbes' Leviathan theory? Discuss three artists in different fields on the relationship between normative and mandatory things to change or update these concepts. British philosopher Thomas Hobbes of the 17th century is now widely recognized as one of the few truly great political philosophers. It is very important in work. This article outlines philosophical literature and explains various common understanding points between traditional concepts of common interest such as Plato, Aristotle, John Locke, J. J. Rousseau, Adam Smith, G. Hegel, John Rawls, Michael Walzer. It also includes some important differences, especially the difference between "common" and "distributed" views. Finally, we will consider three important themes in literature: democracy, community sharing, and a competitive market. In order to understand these problems, we must first distinguish between common interests that play outstanding roles in welfare economics, various product concepts, and inevitable discussions of welfare political ethics. In the west, there are many books and articles on universal human rights. Kant, Hobbes, Rousseau, Rock, Rawls and many other philosophers are often quoted in discussions. However, few Western philosophers try to explore Chinese philosophy and analyze human rights. Many western scholars simply deny the seeds of human rights and democracy in the Chinese tradition. In short, many Western scholars believe that the concept of human rights is not the East but the fundamentals of the West. During the drafting of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights from 1946 to 1948, it was noted that human rights are identical to western values. At that time, the executive committee of the American Anthropological Association warned that the 'declaration' was 'right to assert rights based only on values ​​spreading in Western Europe and the United States.' (Quoted from Nickel, 1987, page 68)

The two great philosophers, Immanuel Kant and Aristotle, opposed the actions whom Edward Snowden was a whistleblower to disclose internal information to the American citizens. Snowden, the National Security Agency and CIA computer expert, thought that he was wrong and discovered that he should be known to American citizens, so I decided to disclose it. Based on his philosophy, Aristotle will constitute the assertion that the behavior of Snowden is a good person, not a believer of a city. Immanuel Kant is the most famous metaphysician in the history of philosophy and since his pioneering research on the development of this theme by Aristotle, his "critique of pure reason" is the most comprehensive analysis of metaphysics There is no doubt. . Unfortunately, as I will briefly explain, for human beings, Kant committed a small but fundamental mistake. ... Even if there is movement, it combines two elements (spatiotemporal) and assumes some empirical things. For example, movement premises something that can be moved. However, since there is no moving thing in the space considered, the movement must be empirical data, that is only seen in space through experience. Emmanuel Kant (1724-1804) German philosopher. Kant's "critique of pure reason" tries to combine reason from experiences between reason and empiricism to experience and to remove philosophy. Kant's philosophy affects future German idealists and philosophers such as Shelling and Schopenhauer. Thomas Paine (1737-1809) British and American writers and political activists. He is an avid supporter of American independence. Pain wrote many articles to support Republican ideals. This had a major impact on the revolution in America and France. The noteworthy works are as follows. Human rights (1791) AP: On the philosophical side, I have completed my interpretive research "Kant's meta-theory: the first critical basis of his behavioral theory". First of all, to prove that Kant's morality is not understood. It has no meaning. Second, the interpretation of Kant's ethics shows how to help solve some of the long-standing problems in the decision theory of Ramsey-Savage - the theory of decision theory Standard This version will help solve some of the longstanding problems in Kant's ethics. For more than a century, these two areas have always crossed the cantrest which is regarded as a deadly enemy and can not be overcome each other. It is time to put this hostility aside and incorporate each conceptual resource into a joint project.

When a person dies, he will go. This is the problem people have been thinking from the beginning. In the depths of mankind, people are the power of reason. According to reasonable explanation, this world is not the end of everything. People can not understand the concept of stopping existence. For that reason, a myriad of people have proposed the idea of ​​life after death for many years. Christianity calls it redemption. Buddhism calls it enlightenment. But whatever its name, it includes what is after death. Kantoism is a philosophical theory created by a man named Emmanuel Kant. According to Emmanuel Kant or Kantism, his theory emphasizes the modern position and deals with spiritual philosophy, epistemology and ethics. In 1948, Gamou predicted that large nuclear synthetic radiation should still be filled in the universe. Emanuel Kant was born in Königsberg, East Prussia in 1724 and was a philosopher and professor who died in 1804 (Turner, 2012, paragraph 2). Kant developed a theory of occupational ethics focusing on nonsequential moral theory. According to Thiroux and Krasemann (2012), Kant's theory states that ethical problems can be answered by different reasoning (page 50). Another ethical theory compared with Kant's professional ethics theory is the utilitarian ethical theory. Utilitarianism has two forms According to Kant, morality is a priori like metaphysics, meaning that our moral responsibility is determined independently of empirical considerations. Therefore, Kant's morality can be contrasted with an ethical view such as utilitarianism. It thinks that the morals of action arise from the result. Based on moral metaphysics, Kant reviewed his basic moral principles he called "absolute order". The moral principle is "order" as it orders and it is "absolute" irrespective of the specific trends and circumstances of the actor, that is to say unconditionally. We point out that this moral principle is given by reason and that we can act only in a way that our code of conduct, the code of conduct, can be used as a universal law. People acting according to non-universal maxims fall into real contradiction Emanuel Kant's moral system was built around the sorting order. Classification order is a universal and absolute ethical standard. These orders build moral ethics, or what Kant calls "moral order". According to him, they must be applicable to all, all situations and all occasions. The decision does not change according to the situation. The order of classification is an important feature of the Kant 's order and he believes that true morality depends only on the principle of guiding action, not depending on the final result. Kant believes that morality is absolute and provable; the right thing can be determined by putting actions or maxims into the equation.

The death penalty is often called the death penalty or the death penalty of a crime. This is a controversial topic that has been discussed by many people and great thinkers. The two famous figures are Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill. Both of them support the death penalty, but the reasons for their conclusion are totally different. I personally oppose the death penalty, but my personal opinion on this contains a number of complex factors from two people and my personal opinion. Classical utilitarianism is an ethical theoretical approach introduced by philosophers Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill. A scholar like Immanuel Kant of "legal philosophy" in front of them regards punishment as a moral obligation. Kant believes that sanctions are not for the promotion of good but for direct punishment of perpetrators. Classical utilitarianism also shifts the point of punishment to its purpose and result. Based on the Utilitarian approach, sanctions can be justified if sanctions can bring the greatest benefit to most people. Punishment is reasonable if you can prevent you from creating public safety from crime. Immanual Kant provides another form of retaliatory defense against the death penalty, and this reason is not rooted in revenge. On the contrary, for Kant, the grounds for the death penalty have the ability to make a rational and free choice, so everyone is worthy and deserves respect. Murder is also worthy of respect; therefore, we respect him in a way he insists that people will be treated. Therefore, we execute the murderer. This seems to be a distorted version of the golden rule. An important issue for Kant to justify the death penalty is that we tell us that only the ideal rational murderer can process it even though many killers are actually unreasonable It is that. Another major Utilitarian, John Stuart Meal, embodies the unique aspect of the Utilitarian approach, but in defending the death penalty. In a speech issued as a member of Congress in 1868, Müller believed that the death penalty was thought of as a punishment for a "serious violence incident" of serious murder ("Speech ...", 268). Mill insists that "rapid drama of rapid death" is actually far less than "longevity in the most difficult and monotonous work". Hope "(" Speech ... ", 268). When Sorell briefly summarizes Muller's position," The hardest effort of life is actually severe punishment than I think, the death penalty is even more serious than that It seems like "(" Increase of murder ... ", 204). Death penalty is a better deterrent for others and less pain and suffering for criminals, as the deterrent effect of punishment depends greatly on how it looks.

Immanuel Kant is a German philosopher of the 18th century and is widely known for his accomplishments and works such as "critique of pure reason" and "basic moral metaphysics". Kant developed a moral theory that depends on reason rather than emotion, called moral law. Kant is not anti-religious, but he wants a moral system not covered by religious, emotional or personal interpretation. Kant believes that morality is a necessary and reasonable function based on our perception of universal law. Emmanuel Kant thinks that the moral law is absolute and creates classification orders. Since Kant believes that people can not kill, unmanned vehicles will never choose to kill. I believe that unmanned vehicles will be safer, more regulated and more predictable if they follow the sorting order. We have developed artificial intelligence to make us smarter and more useful; A. I. can now perform very difficult tasks on a human-like level. Many people are concerned about artificial intelligence, and many others are introducing artificial intelligence as soon as possible; however, both know that it is coming. This technology is here and it is very capable, but people are not ready to jump on a fully automated car. This change is an ambitious step. To say that this is a big step for humanity, it will be an extremely discreet expression. Harry Surden and Mary-Anne Williams of the University of Colorado say the following in "opacity of technology, predictability and automatic driving vehicle". Emanuel Kant's moral system was built around the sorting order. Classification order is a universal and absolute ethical standard. These orders build moral ethics, or what Kant calls "moral order". According to him, they must be applicable to all, all situations and all occasions. The decision does not change according to the situation. The order of classification is an important feature of the Kant 's order and he believes that true morality depends only on the principle of guiding action, not depending on the final result. Kant believes that morality is absolute and provable; the right thing can be determined by putting actions or maxims into the equation. Moral theory was developed by Emmanuel Kant (1724-1804). Kant believes that the ultimate outcome is not the most important, but on the contrary, what really matters is deciding the ethical intent of the decision or the action itself. Kant evaluates the morality of human behavior and ignores the result. He further believes that, regardless of the expected outcome, we have the necessary responsibilities and should not give up their responsibilities. According to Kant, these obligations are absolute and must be applied equally to everyone.

Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill vs. Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill, two confrontational philosophers. Even if they live in different countries, their work is opposite. Kant pointed out that there is nothing other than just wanting goodwill in his book "Foundations of Moral Metaphysics". He repeatedly emphasized the importance of goodwill and tried to show how moral philosophy is effective when goodwill was used as an important element. Emmanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill are philosophers who have solved moral problems in terms of the formation of moral habits. Immanuel Kant advocated a point of view "based on his belief that human value is inherent in his reasonable skill" the basis of moral metaphysics ". John Stuart Miller is thinking ... Show more ... Muller is opposed to "Human complaints are more satisfying than pigs", which is an animal's meaning of human dissatisfaction I am satisfied with the degree of satisfaction, more specifically, "better Socrates is not satisfied with foolish satisfaction." This means that an idiot has only a different opinion, as he does not know the two aspects of the problem. This sentence means that Mill dismissed the concept of "happiness", replaced it with the concept of "happy and painless" and replaced the concept of "misfortune" with the concept of "lack of pain and pleasure" . Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill vs. Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill, two confrontational philosophers. Even if they live in different countries, their work is opposite. Kant pointed out that there is nothing other than just wanting goodwill in his book "Foundations of Moral Metaphysics". - Compare Mill and Kant's ethical theory; this will make the social order better. John Stuart Mill (1808-73) believed that moral theory is called Utilitarianism. There are many expressions in this theory. One of them is that "Everyone acts like this and makes all participants balance the utmost good and evil." But good is a relative term. what would you like. Utilitarians are opposed to this problem. Mill to distinguish between happiness and pure sensory pleasure The aim of this paper is to show how the belief of John Stuart Meal to good for everyone is suitable for our society, ie the practice of making moral justice is better than the principle of Emmanuel Kant It is to explain better things clearly. I will explain why Muller's theory leads better ethical behavior and can distinguish between human rights and responsibility for yourself and society. Emmanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill are philosophers who have solved moral problems in terms of the formation of moral habits. Immanuel Kant advocated a point of view "based on his belief that human value is inherent in his reasonable skill" the basis of moral metaphysics ". John Stuart Mill is thinking ... Read more

"All will continue to change and will continue to change, but past changes and future changes are beneficial to humans, they give more men more peace, more happiness, or more happiness (526) AbbéGaillaumeThomasFrancois Raynal quotes this sentence in the philosophical and political history of two Indian colonies and trade in India and eloquently explains the rationality of the philosophy of the 18th century . What is enlightenment? Since the German philosopher Emanuel Conde initially raised this question in 1784, this question has generated countless answers in the past two and half and a half centuries. According to the history of the Kantian period, from the 17th century to the 18th century, human growth in intellectual maturity. Through emphasis on scientific research and rational discussion, Kant et al. Can finally think of human beings not by relying on the authority of the church, the Greek philosopher, or other sources revealing the truth I assert. Immanuel Kant explains in his article "What is Enlightenment?" Describes the nature of Enlightenment and how it is generally communicated. According to Kant, "Enlightenment is the liberation of man from self-monitoring." Through this, Kant means that enlightenment refers to those who can use his understanding without the guidance of other people. Kant believes that the age of enlightenment is an era in which human society is released from the essence of liberation. However, Kant pointed out that we were born again as a guardian when we were young, and it was okay. Furthermore, we should revitalize our rational capacity after releasing this need naturally.

Emmanuel Kant 's critical critical philosophy is Kant' s first achievement, which has made him one of the greatest thinkers of contemporary philosophy and one of the most influential writers of contemporary philosophy. However, it is important to understand what Kant calls "criticism" or "criticism". In a general sense, this term refers to the general development of reasoning through the scientific safety route (Bxxx). More specifically, its use is not negative, it is affirmative, and it is expressed in the expression that it is necessary to deny knowledge to make room for faith (Bxxx). Frankfurt scholars theorists clearly link with Inmanuel Kant's critical philosophy. Here, the term "criticism" philosophically reflects the direct relationship between the limits of certain intellectual assertions and the emphasis on such criticism and moral autonomy. Rather than the traditional static theory of certainty and human behavior. Under the background of dogmaticism positivism and science, and dogmatism 'scientific socialism', critical theorists try to restore Marx's thought through philosophical criticism. Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) Emmanuel Kant is an influential German philosopher, whose "pure rational critique" ties the reasons and experiences into philosophical thought. Discussions between rationalists and empiricists have left. Kant's philosophy affects future German idealists and philosophers such as Shelling and Schopenhauer. John Locke (1632-1704) Locke is a leading philosopher and political theorist who has had a great influence on generous political thought. He is believed to have several ideas like a social contract - you need to get the idea that the government is agreed by rulers. Locke also claims liberty, religious tolerance, and life and property rights. Locke is an influential figure like Jefferson, Madison, and Voltaire for those involved in the American and French revolution. Emmanuel Kant - German philosopher Emmanuel Kant (1724-1804) is considered one of the founder of Western philosophy. In 1781, Kant wrote "a rational critique" that supports the idea of ​​scientific logic and rational thought methods, which makes logical thinking better than doctrine and other authoritative opinions. Bertrand Russell - British philosopher, mathematician, and Bantrand Russell (1872-1970, Episcopal Russell, 3rd) to support the scientific method of Kant believe that knowledge is "a belief consistent with facts" It was. He insists that it is not enough to believe that there is no evidence and instead should check whether there are correct and agreed supporting facts and who agrees (1926).

Autonomous Autonomy In the latter half of the eighteenth century, with the release of his moral theory, Immanuel Kant completely changed philosophy in a way that greatly influenced decades of thinkers after him. The result of his influence led to his perception and interpretation of the opinion of writers around the world. Kant's idealism arises from the idea that a moral law, a set of rules specific to each person gives the ability to infer people in a way to get the truth. In line with that title, Ralph Waldo Emerson's "independence" fundamentally promotes confidence in himself. Essentially, Emerson finds the absolute truth of an individual in himself and asks for trust in the truth based on the universal connection with sacred things. His attractive information has had a major impact on contemporary Americans thinking, but people may legitimately question the validity of their bibles according to the Bible. By adhering to the word of God, one can unravel the intertwining components of Emerson's philosophy, and unfortunately can find that they contradict the teachings of the Bible. In the final analysis Emerson built his argument based on "independence" based on the principle of self-confidence not biblical. Independence means different from person to person. However, the underlying meaning is to always refer to individuals as self-dependence, dependence means dependence, place, or thing to individuals, so independence is the state where one person is fully responsible to their own country. That is your goal Someone may ask, what is independence? Independence is to rely on your ability, judgment, resources, independence. In "independence" written by American transcendent Ralph Waldo Emerson, we will explain how we should live and prosper as a person. In order to adjust ourselves, we must believe in ourselves, believe in ourselves, and create individualism. Emerson's Ralph Waldo Emerson's article, hobby seeking self-reliance from yourself, carries out his deep individualism, independence, and a universal assessment to nature in the United States. His idea was sometimes controversial, but he used this teaching to influence many young people. Ralph Waldo Emerson always thinks about new ideas when redefining your world view. Emerson expressed his idea with eloquence of nature in his poetry, essays and lectures; he was one of the most quoted writers in American history. Ralph Waldo Emerson I recently returned to the eternal article "independence" of Ralph Waldo Emerson and found out that it is different from my memory. Emerson's self-reliance is strict individualism, uncontrollable, lonely; must invent his own idea, others should be cursed. This is somewhat different from our autonomous verbal concept, which is one of self-fulfillment in the sense of materialism, or the quality of people who achieved many accomplishments through hard work. Sweat, tears ") When we think about an independent person, many of us imagine wild West's pioneer type, survive to adventure in the wilderness wilderness to tell stories, its character is Although it is not true, we can easily point out that this person has already won, despite being present in the past, we have to ask for this What is independence in modern life?

Even though they are not aware of your existence, have you ever loved someone so much as you would give them something? How long does it take to leave them in your life? The film "Petra's Tears of Tears" directed by German famous film director Reina Werner Fassbinder explores the inherent operation of each relationship. People I love are consistent in length. The bitter tears of Petra von Kant are based on the events in Fassbinder's own love life. If you are familiar with Petra von Kant's The Bitter Tears, casting is a precious tribute to the movie, its power and a subtle approach to despair. But even if you are not familiar with Fassbinder masterpieces, Casting will function as a vibrant element to regard it independently as a legitimate place in the world. Judith Engel is a documentary filmmaker who makes remake of "Petra von Kant's bitter tears" matching Fassbinder's 75th birthday and debuts as a television film director. Very uneasy women seem to be ashamed of debut in the movie world (not to mention about motherhood) Vera can not decide who should play Petra, the rest of the crew I am making members crazy. One of the most famous movies of the legendary German new wave movie writer Reina Werner Fass Binder was his 1972 adaptation of his drama, Petra von Conde's bitter tears. This film is totally shot in the lineup of all female actors and when it becomes interdependent, it is seeing the dark, distorted side of love (or we are convinced that it is love It is. The famous fashion designer Margit Carstensen fell in love with a young lady Hanna Schygulla and was absorbed in her longtime silent assistant Irm Hermann. The dynamics of the relationship between the three women is all about ownership and obsession. Petra is obvious, not to mention other people who are embarrassed about her life, but it is prosperous in controlling and abusing Karin and Marlene. Finally, she tortured by herself The first one is bitter tears of Petra von Kant of Rainer Werner Fassbinder, an iconic building of the world's cinema. Extensive extras complement this omission that was once obvious. "Palm Beach Story" by Preston Sturges is an exciting story in the history of Hollywood before the Second World War, and a pair of contemporary films including Lucielia Martel's 2001 Rashi Naga and Gaimadin's 2007 movies now Added season Criterion collection. My Winnipeg The latter's latter is based on the quality of the initial collaboration between the director and the family video tag Brand Upon The Brain and offers particularly exciting advice! This is a great success several years ago.

Summary on Hentle and Kant 's ontological argument: I will refute Kant' s ontological argument against criticism of Hentle 's Kant' s argument. In ontological arguments can be expressed in a syllabologic way. Everything that I imagine is clearly and unambiguously attributed to the nature or essence of what can be regarded as the truth. I clearly understand that there is the essence or essence of a perfect existence; therefore, existence is a perfect existence, that is to say the complete existence of existence. Note: I did not provide an example of "Hegel" ontological debate because I know that such discussion is not proposed. Many people argue that Hegel provides an ontological argument; however, when asked to list the premise of discussion, Hegel's friends can not express it. (To protect Hegel from these claims - but not to provide the premise of "Hegel's ontological argument" - see Reading and Bubbio 2014) I imagine existence rather than a bigger existence. Without more existence, I can imagine that there are multiple entities, not larger ones - that is, they exist and have a larger presence. I can not imagine existence that exists rather than existence rather than a larger existence. Therefore, there is no more existence Criticism of the ontological argument began with Gauniro at the same time as St. Anselm. Perhaps the most famous criticism of ontological debate is due to Emmanuel Kant in his criticism of pure reason. Most notably, Kant argues that ontological arguments are at risk by implicit assumptions that "existence" is a predicate. But as Bertrand Russell said, it is easy to be confident that ontological arguments are less accurate than what they are doing. This will help explain why ontological discussions have captivated philosophers for nearly 1000 years. This philosophy of "absolute perception of existence and difference" confirms the new ontological position of Deleuze between Kant and Hegel. For Kant, thought is only a "perfectly ideal" problem, for Hegel, dialectical thinking is perfectly practical. However, for Deleuze, the idea itself has problems. Like Hegel, Deleuze will prove that instinctive reality can not be caught by dialectical thinking. Thoughts can certainly fully express the existence - but it is only the difference between (non-conceptual, nonnegative) format that you can essentially maintain the problem of difference (for Hegel). Between Kant and Hegel, Deleuz's argument is that the idea as a problem is constitutive. In other words, they themselves oppose the rationality of Kant's rationality unilaterally. So why does Deleuze argue that "eternity is a dizziness of philosophy"? Deleuze 's work may have both an obvious answer and a potential answer.

When comparing David Hume and Emanuel Kant, David Hume and Emanuel Kant can make a big progress with each other theorists, suggest morals that do not need higher existence and God, and can recognize him. Moral responsibility Hume and Kant share some basic principles, but they have different views on morality. Comparing the different perspectives of one's will and the sayings established by the moral values ​​of David Hume and Emanuel Kant show that although their moral theory is limited, there are still some advantages It was. The ethics of Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) are in stark contrast to the ethics of David Hume (1711-1776). Hume's moral philosophical approach is experimental and empirical; Kant emphasizes the need to establish a moral foundation in transcendentalism. Hume said that the reason is just "slave of passion", while Kant establishes morality with the concept of his own concept. Hume considers the feelings of kindness and generosity as a correct moral motive and Kant saw the motive of responsibility - Hume usually regards it as the motive of second best or recession, thus giving a devotion to morality that gives special morality Uniquely represent. Value is conveyed to action. Although the moral views of Kant and Hume are hostile to each other in many ways, there is also an important relationship between them. When comparing David Hume and Emanuel Kant, David Hume and Emanuel Kant can make a big progress with each other theorists, suggest morals that do not need higher existence and God, and can recognize him. Moral responsibility Hume and Kant share some basic principles, but they have different views on morality. I found some moral theory by comparing the different opinions of human will to determine moral value and the sayings established by David Hume and Immanuel Kant.

Daniel C. Dennet said in a wonderful accident, "Our thoughts - if you want - it is as realistic as our dreams" (Kayzer, 37). If this is true, if our thoughts and consciousness are simply dreams and brain structures, what we feel, our memories, and reality are just illusions. . Not only is this the correct remark in science, but also doubts about who we are and what we know. Does philosophy lead us to a better life? Here, Professor Philip Kitcher at Columbia University explains Plato, Aristotle, Socrates, Confucius, Mencius, Emmanuel Kant, Friedrich Nietzsche, Albert Coronation, Jean-Paul Sartre and others. Such a wonderful idea helps to find the meaning and happiness of human existence even if there is no "better place". As time passed, philosophers such as Plato, Aristotle, Socrates, Kant cast doubt about the meaning of art. Several dialogues in Plato solved the problem of art: Socrates said that inspiration for poetry came from the museum, not rational. He agrees with other forms of Phaedrus (265a-c) sacred craziness (alcoholism, desires and dreams), but in the Republic he would like to cancel Homer's wonderful poetry art and laughter. In 'Aeon', Socrates did not imply his opposition to the Homer of the Republic. Today's Bible, as it is in the modern Christian world, suggests that Hoemier's Iliad plays a role in the ancient Greek world. Socrates and Aristotle dedicated their lives to exchange studies and discovery practices. Most of their ideas are on books like republics and rhetoric. Socrates completed the dialecticism - while one communicates by suggesting an objection, the other responds by preserving an established thinking school. On the other hand, Aristotle explains rhetoric - the ability of a person to persuade people's ideas through a one-way dialogue (also called a demonstration).

The theme of Antigone in 2013 is the fight between political law and moral law; the difference in obeying the law is that it is legal and obeys its own morality as you think it is right. Antigone's role faced this struggle when Kryon refused to bury Antikone's Polykines brothers. The ancient Greeks believed that it was forbidden to enter the afterlife without proper burial. Through her own moral position Beginning from the origin of Western philosophical thinking, people became interested in moral law. As Hume pointed out in his thesis, "morality is the theme that makes us happy" (David Hume's "Anthropology theory"). First, the idea of ​​how to live is the problem of having the most satisfying life, "The Virtue of Managing Relationships between One Person and Others" (JB Schneewind's " Philosophy "). But having a lifestyle perspective is best for everyone. Kant's responsibility system is based on special advantages and bad habits; these obligations are based on moral law, the highest principle of morality. According to Kant, the moral law highlights that it is an absolute command (CI) for incomplete and limited rational creatures such as us. All our responsibilities are based on this highest ethical principle. In the basic work, Kant described in detail some of his CI statements. A formula of universal law orders, "based on the saying that you can make it a universal law at the same time" (G. 4: 421). The universal natural law formula, "as if your motto motto was made by your will" (G. 4: 421). The last expression is the command itself. "So, whether it's yourself or someone else, it's always the last time, not just as a means, but as a use of human behavior" (G 4: 429) According to Kant, the moral value of action depends on the will of that person, which is the only thing in the world that can be regarded as good if it is not qualified. Act in good faith according to ethical responsibility / legal measures. Moral law consists essentially of an absolute series of maxims - we are responsible for acting in accordance with absolute orders. Kant pointed out that a true moral proposition can not be tied to specific conditions, including the identity of the person making the decision. The Code of Ethics is not related to the specific physical details surrounding the proposition and should be applied to reasonable existence. According to Kant, we have a complete duty not to use maxims that lead to logical contradiction at first. The moral system of Emmanuel Kant was built around the sorting order. Classification order is a universal and absolute ethical standard. These orders build moral ethics, or what Kant calls "moral order". According to him, they must be applied to all situations, every situation. The decision does not change according to the situation. The order of classification is an important feature of the Kant 's order and he believes that true morality depends only on the principle of guiding behavior, not depending on the final result. Kant thinks morality is absolute and proofable; the right thing can be determined by putting actions or maxims into the equation.

Metaphysics in the rehabilitation of Kant and Hume, Kant read David Hume, he said, "I made him awake from his dogmatic sleep.Life problems and prejudice This furthermore Kant is his own metaphysics I urged Hume to reply in the analysis of the theory Kant does not think that Hume can cope with these problems appropriately, in particular to solve the problem of whether Hume is feasible as science Decide to avoid places where Hume is located. After the break, the philosopher Emmanuel Conde started reforming metaphysics. Kant believes that metaphysics is impossible if Hume is right. However, Kant did not want to give way to Hume 's skepticism, so Kant began to criticize the possibility to explore and reform metaphysics. Kant began to criticize the quest for 'transcendental' knowledge in philosophy. Kant began looking for the "transcendental" principle that can reasonably be inferred to explain why he thinks it can not be detected. Kant believes that the only way we can get the necessary and universal thing is through 'a priori'. Kant found that the notion of causality is not the only concept to understand things 'a priori' but the metaphysics confirmed to consist completely of these concepts. (8) "Prolegomena", Kant said he had read David Hume, "let him awake from an arbitrary sleep." This is a study of Hum's human understanding, which allows Kant to recognize the problems and prejudices of life that he had not previously realized. It further encouraged Kant to answer Hume in his own analysis of metaphysical theory. Kant does not believe that Hume can cope with these problems appropriately, and decides to avoid the place where Hume is located, in particular to solve the problem of whether Hume is possible as science . Kant answered Hume's question directly in metaphysical analysis. Hume stopped thinking and was skeptical of the existence of metaphysics as science, and Kant accepted it. He continues to analyze the effectiveness of metaphysics as science and power in our lives. Talking about other people who can trust in the field of science, such as Copernicus, Kant developed a new way to observe the world. But like Hume, Kant encountered obstacles and could not find a solution.

Mr. Hume said that rationality alone is not enough for people to take action. He said that power to promote action is passion. Passion is the driving force of inner existence, Reason is a slave of passion. The conclusion that leads to impulsivity is caused not by rationality itself but by its guidance. Please let love, anger, fear, anxiety, jealousy act. When someone is angry, they are filled with passion. Not only that "I get angry today", but a person did not say to myself. The philosophy of Immanual Kant (1724-1804), the most influential philosopher since Aristotle, is an attempt to answer the skeptical philosophy of David Hume (1711-1776). According to Hume there is no reason to believe the causal relationship; for example, just because an object seems to have a law of gravity that always causes objects of the past to fall to the ground, the object will not change at such next gravity law There is no reason to believe it to follow. Kant agreed that Hume agreed that he could not understand how something behaves in the real world or the real world. But Kant adds new wrinkles. He thinks that each person's mind builds up a subjective world and that this subjective world is the world that each of us "knows". For the most part of this section I will explain the ethical aspects of Hum's ethics Kant, but I would like to start with a brief overview of Kant's mature moral philosophy. This is done by explaining five important functions for Kant's ethics. This helps to take this into account when dealing with Kant 's response to Hume' s ethics. Second, Kant's concept of autonomy is one of the more central, unique and influential aspects of his ethics. Kant defines autonomy as "an attribute of will" and itself is a law (it is independent from the attribute of the object of will) "(G 4: 440). According to Kant, it is autonomous because the will of the moral actor gives moral law to itself (which is self-legal) and can bind or motivate himself to comply with the law. Hume and Kant are active with two different moral values. It will help explain some of the differences between their respective moral and philosophical approaches. The most important difference is that Kant regards law, duty and obligation as the core of morality, while Hume does not. In this respect, Kant's moral concept is similar to the "moral system" of Bernard Williams, which mainly defines the moral field based on the unconditional constraints and the form of inevitable duty (Williams 1985 : 193-94). Kant believes that our moral concern is a matter of liability, which is mainly imposed on us by law with its own moral needs. Like most philosophers in the eighteenth century, he believes that our moral life is deeply involved in how we maintain benign issues in our lives

For example, if Jack tries to steal something for himself, it should be done because it is correct for him. The main argument about psychological self-interest is that people take action to satisfy the desires of others. For example, Jack is playing video games, and he asked that his mother asked her to help with cooking. He did this to meet his desires, not to satisfy his own desires; he sat down to do some mother who fulfilled his desires but chose to help him. However, moral egoism refers to this phenomenon in a completely different way from psychological egoism. And psychological egoism is descriptive theory (people insist on acting in some way), moral self-interest is a normative theory (people insist that they should act in some way). People are not psychological egosists, they may become moral egoists. The problem with this argument is that it contradicts the central idea of ​​moral egoism and ultimately depends on the principle of mercy rather than the principle of true self-interest. In other words, it only supports moral self-interest as a strategy for pursuing other values ​​- clearly general welfare; it does not support moral self-interest as a fundamental principle of morality. Moral egoism is a normative moral position that moral entities should do for their own benefit. It is different from the psychological egoism which claims that people can act only for their own interests. Moral self-interest is also different from reasonable self-interest Rational self-interest thinks that it is reasonable to act for your own benefit. Therefore, moral egoism thinks in this sense that the result can be regarded as moral that it will benefit the actor. Moral egoism is in contrast to moral altruism, and we believe that moral subjects are obliged to help others. Egisim and altruism are in contrast to moral utilitarianism, and moral actors respect themselves more than respect for others (also known as the subject) (by increasing the ego). Profit and "self") identity of others not permitted) At first glance, the theory of moral egoism and psychological self-interest may seem to be very similar, but in reality it is important that their position to make normative or descriptive claims It differs greatly. Moral self-interest is a result-oriented moral theory, everyone seeks something just for their own benefit, and we think that we should propose normative claims in this way. Moseley (2006) says: "Promoting our own interests is always moral, promoting our own morals is never moral.

2005, p. 79) Moral law, like social law, is a guideline system for managing human behavior. The Ten Commanded by Moses is a moral law with the command of God, which can be a universal rule that everyone should observe. Kant believes that if you want to do it, "moral law can not be essentially a hypothesis and can not be a form". Morality is not determined by desire and its result. On the contrary, the law itself must be absolute in the form of "doing this" or "not doing". (Stumpf, S.E. The fundamental principles of John Mill's utilitarianism and Emanuel Kant's moral metaphysics suggest different views of the two philosophers about the field of moral philosophy. Compared to Kant 's metaphysical segmentation and its use in proof of validity and error, Mill' s utilitarianism is a more sophisticated ethical theory. Kant takes his confirmation of metaphysical survival as discipline of his moral philosophy. If the law has moral power it will be the foundation. When Kant holds the theory of rationalism, Mill has an empirical theory. Kant is morally ethical in the form he believes, it is necessary for practical judgment of freedom and reason. Utilitarian theory of Miller is a kind of resultism. Because the correctness and badness of behavior depends on the outcome. Kant's pure ethics is the basis of his absolute command and provides the basis for his theory of universal duty. Utilitarian theory of Miller is the main form of resultantism John Stuart Mill believes in the moral theory called Utilitarianism and his theory is based on the principle of giving the greatest happiness to most people and Mueller supports the pursuit of happiness. Kant believes that moral theory is called moralist and believes that only the principle of action is important. Utilitarianism believes that morally correct behavior maximizes happiness and minimizes pain. Utilitarian believes that the outcome of actions demonstrates the moral acceptability of the means by which it is accomplished, and the outcome of the behavior is beyond other considerations. In other words, they believe the final proof is correct. Utilitarian thinks that behavior is morally correct if it brings happiness, but it is wrong if it causes pain.

Steve McQueen directed four examples of the philosophical argument of Immanuel Kant and G. W. F Hegel in the 2013 film "12 Years of Slave". Hegel's spiritual phenomenology shows two ideologies. The classification of the relation between him and the Lord complements the political thinking of Kant 's absolute order. In "Basic foundation of moral metaphysics", Kant pointed out that in absolute command of moral norms, human beings are not subjective objectives but their own objective objectives. German idealist philosophy course - in the context of Emmanuel Kant, Friedrich Schelling, G. W. F. Hegel et al. Met a modern thinker who criticizes the philosophical tendency of the latter half of the 18th century. It often results in the title of "idealism." Idealism usually begins with the publication of Kant's purely reasonable criticism in 1781. This book is regarded by many philosophers as one of the most important philosophical works in history. Among them, Kant finally made it possible for humans to show rational thought and to discover their own rationality limit by showing unprecedented intellectual strength. Furthermore, one of the most outstanding conclusions of criticism is Kant's reasoning about various "categories" of human perceptions of the world, such as time and space. The concept of G. W. F. Hegel 's revolution is completely dependent on his view of history. Hegel emphasizes Kant's theory of conceptuality and understands history as a rational process that "concept of freedom" realized itself. From his macroscopic point of view, this phased development, objective "spiritual" self-realization is based on the principle of dialectic principle. It replaced China, India, the Persian "East Asian" civilization, the ancient Greece, the medieval "night" of the Roman Empire, and finally the "Germanic" era of reform and enlightenment. Era, Renaissance, and feudal period (cf. Hegel, 1991). Therefore, the American and French revolution in 1791, or Haitian slave uprising, must be interpreted as an indicator of the current stage of the development of the concept of freedom.

Even though they are not aware of your existence, have you ever loved someone so much as you would give them something? How long does it take to leave them in your life? The film "Petra's Tears of Tears" directed by German famous film director Reina Werner Fassbinder explores the inherent operation of each relationship. People I love are consistent in length. The bitter tears of Petra von Kant are based on the events in Fassbinder's own love life. If you are familiar with Petra von Kant's The Bitter Tears, casting is a precious tribute to the movie, its power and a subtle approach to despair. But even if you are not familiar with Fassbinder masterpieces, Casting will function as a vibrant element to regard it independently as a legitimate place in the world. Judith Engel is a documentary filmmaker who makes remake of "Petra von Kant's bitter tears" matching Fassbinder's 75th birthday and debuts as a television film director. Very uneasy women seem to be ashamed of debut in the movie world (not to mention about motherhood) Vera can not decide who should play Petra, the rest of the crew I am making members crazy. One of the most famous movies of the legendary German new wave movie writer Reina Werner Fass Binder was his 1972 adaptation of his drama, Petra von Conde's bitter tears. This film is totally shot in the lineup of all female actors and when it becomes interdependent, it is seeing the dark, distorted side of love (or we are convinced that it is love It is. The famous fashion designer Margit Carstensen fell in love with a young lady Hanna Schygulla and was absorbed in her longtime silent assistant Irm Hermann. The dynamics of the relationship between the three women is all about ownership and obsession. Petra is obvious, not to mention other people who are embarrassed about her life, but it is prosperous in controlling and abusing Karin and Marlene. Finally, she tortured by herself The first one is bitter tears of Petra von Kant of Rainer Werner Fassbinder, an iconic building of the world's cinema. Extensive extras complement this omission that was once obvious. "Palm Beach Story" by Preston Sturges is an exciting story in the history of Hollywood before the Second World War, and a pair of contemporary films including Lucielia Martel's 2001 Rashi Naga and Gaimadin's 2007 movies now Added season Criterion collection. My Winnipeg The latter's latter is based on the quality of the initial collaboration between the director and the family video tag Brand Upon The Brain and offers particularly exciting advice! This is a great success several years ago.

For Kant and Luther, the problems of human freedom and the number of individual freedoms (if any) are determined to achieve a noble morality. But it is Kant that Luther is arguing, that is, through freedom of religion, I believe in a fatal outlook. For Luther, without God's guidance, we have no freedom to live a moral life. On the other hand, for Kant, Luther insists that individuals are in an "immature" state, so that moral freedom can not be achieved. Kant understanding moral freedom and moral principles has been a key to discussing morality from long ago. His moral philosophy is the philosophy of freedom. No one's freedom, Kant's idea, moral evaluation and moral responsibility are also impossible. Kant believes that if a person can not take other actions, that action is not moral. He further believes that there is a conscience to make everyone understand that moral law has authority over them. Kant called it a "rational fact" and thought that he was the foundation of human freedom. However, Kant believes that the whole nature will follow the principle of strict Newton's causality. In other words, all our physical behavior is caused not by our free will, but by previous events. So how is freedom and morality possible? Hume and Kant believe that freedom is indispensable to morality. In addition, both believe that philosophical theory and advocacy of human morals will harmonize a universal causality need (determinism) and freedom. But they offer different ways to understand different concepts of freedom, different ways to harmonize them with necessary, and why such reconciliation is important to morality. The scholars agree that Hume is a "compatriot", but there is no agreement on the right label of Kant's position. Kant's moral theory is the core concept of autonomy. Most readers believe that Kant believes autonomy is a reasonable intention or property of an agent. In Kant's view, understanding the concept of autonomy is the key to understanding and prove that moral requirements are important to our authority. Just as Rousseau's view influences Kant, freedom is not limited by any law and is limited by some law. Therefore, the concept of freedom as autonomy exceeds the sense that it is simply "negative", that is, the sense that it is released from actions outside of you. It initially contains the concept of law developed and enacted by itself, and along with it the law with its own decisive authority

Kant's "critique of pure reason" indicates that there are multiple categories, and he uses logic to derive these conclusions. "It is also possible to intuitively synthesize only the unity of expressions that differ intuitively by the same function with different representation unity.This is often called purely understanding concept.Therefore, The logical form brings about the same behavior of the concept and also brings transcendental content to that expression through integration of diversity in a general intuition. My own opinion is that the criticism of Kant of philosophical multiculturalism based on advertising is also caused by the old and deep tendency of the 19th century, the 20th century, the 21st century, that is anti - Cantanism, or simply anti - Canti is. I mean Kant and Kant's philosophy, and even prejudice against fear. Furthermore, in the American McCarthyism from the end of the Second World War and from the late 1940s to the 1950s, the mainstream British and American academic philosophy almost all German philosophy (except for early analysis philosophers like Eph) . Just as most of Europe's philosophy influenced by Marxist is a moral aura, members and colleagues of reggae, Wittgenstein, Carnap, and other Vienna circles are moral by Nazi style fascism aura Contaminated with related pollution, Russia, Stalinist communism Since the 20th century, critics tended to think that Kant had a tense relationship with religion, which is not a general view of the 19th century. The letter from Karl Leonhardt's Line Hold made Kant the first known. She wrote: "I believe that I can deduce religion without reservation, in particular Christian interests are in full compliance with reasonable criticism, one of Kant's first comments, John Schulz, "Is this system itself fully integrated with Christian faith, the latter's deity and good deed are more obvious?" As Friedrich Nietzsche said this view through the 19th century , He said, "Kant's success is only the theologian's success." Spinosimism is widely believed to be the cause of the pantiesism controversy. Even atheism is a complicated pantheism This article examines the latest trends in Kant scholarship on religious philosophy and these trends are in a general view of Kant as a philosopher who decisively holds metaphysical things, especially metaphysical metaphysics I claim to challenge. This view is often used to justify the anti-metaphysical grounds of most modern theology and religious philosophy; a discreet picture that Kant is now appearing is causing problems for this attraction.

Many philosophers are proving how knowledge human beings have and knowledge. Kant, Rock, and Descartes took different positions and piloted points. For example, Descartes believes certainty comes from human reason, but Locke believes that all certainty comes from human experience. Kant combines these two theories and points out that both rationality and experience are necessary for certainty. All three arguments are valid, but I personally think that Kant's view is the strongest. Both Rock and Descartes' discussions are going down a little. Most epistemological theories are not purely reasonable as Descartes. In addition, although the influence of Kant is enormous, contemporary theorists do not accept the concept of synthesizing prior knowledge based on Kant's transcendental idealism. Nevertheless, many epistemologists believe that naturalistic resources can not cope with skepticism and fundamental problems of the nature of cognitive defense well. Or they believe they can cope only through questions like these resources appealing. On the other hand, Naturalists argue that there is nothing in transcendental epistemology. Unless epistemology is entirely based on the practice of scientific exploration and the results obtained thereby, it is totally different from evidence and strategy which is the only evidence that can be proved or confirmed eventually. There are few that Kant can break the position as one of the most influential moral theorists of the present age. But Kant took a break and started racist anthropology. Kant accepted the appearance of multiple bodies. Kant argues that in a hierarchical order of human kind, only white people can get voluntary and complete moral and rational ability - a real person -. Kant's moral equality principle applies only to Caucasians, so there is a quantitative limit. His excellence has deeply rooted these ideas into the classification of mankind until the 20th century. (Kant 's racist racism is now abnormal as it attracts some academic attention.)

When a person dies, he will go. This is the problem people have been thinking from the beginning. In the depths of mankind, people are the power of reason. According to reasonable explanation, this world is not the end of everything. People can not understand the concept of stopping existence. For that reason, a myriad of people have proposed the idea of ​​life after death for many years. Christianity calls it redemption. Buddhism calls it enlightenment. But whatever its name, it includes what is after death. Kantoism is a philosophical theory created by a man named Emmanuel Kant. According to Emmanuel Kant or Kantism, his theory emphasizes the modern position and deals with spiritual philosophy, epistemology and ethics. In 1948, Gamou predicted that large nuclear synthetic radiation should still be filled in the universe. Emanuel Kant was born in Königsberg, East Prussia in 1724 and was a philosopher and professor who died in 1804 (Turner, 2012, paragraph 2). Kant developed a theory of occupational ethics focusing on nonsequential moral theory. According to Thiroux and Krasemann (2012), Kant's theory states that ethical problems can be answered by different reasoning (page 50). Another ethical theory compared with Kant's professional ethics theory is the utilitarian ethical theory. Utilitarianism has two forms According to Kant, morality is a priori like metaphysics, meaning that our moral responsibility is determined independently of empirical considerations. Therefore, Kant's morality can be contrasted with an ethical view such as utilitarianism. It thinks that the morals of action arise from the result. Based on moral metaphysics, Kant reviewed his basic moral principles he called "absolute order". The moral principle is "order" as it orders and it is "absolute" irrespective of the specific trends and circumstances of the actor, that is to say unconditionally. We point out that this moral principle is given by reason and that we can act only in a way that our code of conduct, the code of conduct, can be used as a universal law. People acting according to non-universal maxims fall into real contradiction Emanuel Kant's moral system was built around the sorting order. Classification order is a universal and absolute ethical standard. These orders build moral ethics, or what Kant calls "moral order". According to him, they must be applicable to all, all situations and all occasions. The decision does not change according to the situation. The order of classification is an important feature of the Kant 's order and he believes that true morality depends only on the principle of guiding action, not depending on the final result. Kant believes that morality is absolute and provable; the right thing can be determined by putting actions or maxims into the equation.

The moral importance of Kant's beauty I insist on Kant's aesthetics interpretation. There, the beautiful experience plays a role in an invisible church of natural religion just like the church in which the church religion is visible. Therefore, I believe that Kant himself implicitly connects aesthetics and morality (in third criticism and religion) is much stronger than critics explain. Indeed, for Kant, to find Kant's belief that morality finally ended - in order to find a moral community - human moral psychology requires expression of moral value, so it requires an aesthetic experience maybe. One of the last important aspects of Kant's aesthetic theory is that beauty is claiming to be a "symbol" of morality (5: 351 ff), an aesthetic judgment is a kind of moral recognition "moral It is like things. This is because certain aspects of taste judgment (see 7a above) are similar in important aspects of moral judgment. Even if it does not lead to obvious beneficial results, the immediacy of aesthetic appreciation and selfless correspond to the honorable requirement of moral quality: it itself is good. The freedom to participate in the evaluation of a beautiful university reminds us the freedom of freedom and the premise that moral needs. The universality and necessity included in aesthetic judgment correspond to the universality and inevitability of the moral law. In short, Kant believes that sensitivity to aesthetic pleasure helps prepare the mind for moral recognition. Moral theory was developed by Emmanuel Kant (1724-1804). Kant believes that the ultimate outcome is not the most important, but on the contrary, what really matters is deciding the ethical intent of the decision or the action itself. Kant evaluates the morality of human behavior and ignores the result. He further believes that, regardless of the expected outcome, we have the necessary responsibilities and should not give up their responsibilities. According to Kant, these obligations are absolute and must be applied equally to everyone. As a result of action. Emmanuel Kant is a moralist who believes that ethical behavior can overcome the result. He believes that it is morally important to keep your duty and goodwill. Kant created an absolute order containing three expressions: the universal law, the end itself and the kingdom of purpose, and the conclusion, unless everyone is doing this, he should do something It was that it was not. As a volunteer, Kant mentioned two different responsibilities: complete obligation means morally subject to violation and incomplete obligation, and violation will not lead to contradiction. On the other hand, John Stuart Meal studied Utilitarianism. Mill believes in actions that maximize utility. His goal is to bring maximum happiness to the maximum number of people and reduce pain. Kant believes in responsibility; Mill believes that the value of action can be measured only by result. For Kant, this is an absolute command,

If we are morally responsible, how do we decide it? Initially, the concept of control principles was put into practical use until people noticed that they did not actually practice it, which led to the creation of moral luck. Two philosophers who opposed the concept of moral luck were Nagel and Kant. I think Kant has a good foundation for what he believes, but I do not think he has answers to the roles that luck plays in our decisions. After the paper by Thomas Nagel and Bernard Williams, the literature on moral luck began to become serious. Although not under the heading "moral luck", the issue of moral luck has been discussed before articles by Nagel and Williams. Nagel's paper is written as Williams' comment, but their focus is quite different. Nevertheless, the same problem still exists at the core of the two papers. In fact, it is also a central issue of moral literature: the idea of ​​this moral difference is very broad. Various differences are considered. The most obvious is that the moral responsibility of a person may be different, but luck affects the moral defense of our behavior, which affects the moral status of people. In his classical 'moral luck' (1979) paper, Thomas Nagel argues that moral luck reveals paradox in our concept of moral responsibility. The inconsistent paradox of Nagel can be summarized as follows. The central element of our concept of moral responsibility is the control condition (hereinafter called CC), which can be represented in the form of a schematic: the inevitable result of CC is that people You should not be responsible for something beyond the control of. Factors such as compulsion, unconscious movement and excuses ignorance How does Nagel understand the idea that "people can bear moral responsibility only for what they do?" In other words, moral luck seems to indicate that his moral responsibility conflicts. According to Nagel's idea, it seems to be as follows. Actions can be evaluated as commendable or expressible only if they can go back to "responsible" or "active" self (hereinafter referred to as "AS"). .1 In fact, this is what CC will do to Nagel. Once the action is connected to your AS in the correct way, the agent can control the action. When action is issued from this self, it can be judged morally, as Nagel asserts, "e is judging him, not his existence or characteristic It is for judging that it is. , P. 36). Therefore, when evaluating behavior ethically, you need to make sure that the behavior is associated with the agent's AS in the correct way.

In the process of growth, I have the right to freely choose who I want to be free and decide what I want to do. Since I was a child I had the opportunity to try various opportunities and new things. The simple life I lived as a child was protected and loved by everyone, but I forgot the reality, I got lost in my own "perfect" world. However, as I grew and beyond the imaginary world, the concept of "perfection" began to fade and the reality started to disappear. Like cold water, I changed from a simple attitude to an adult. John Stuartmir's "practical" ethical theory and Immanuel Kant's "sorting order" ethical theory. According to utilitarianism, euthanasia is morally justified, and according to Kantism, euthanasia is morally irrational; however, I lead these two positions to their particular position Argued that it is due to a large defect inherent in inference. There is no suitable solution to this problem. According to Utilitarianism, morality is mainly of the kind ... the theory behind Utilitarianism is that if the it does not promote happiness or joy, the behavior of a person that it is wrong promotes happiness and happiness This is the case. The point of this theory is the principle of utility, "maximum happiness to the people who should be the most". (Palmer) Jeremy Bentham basically brought it to the name of Utilitarianism. I pay more attention than those before him Utilitarianism is the opposite of Kant's moral theory. Kant's theory is based on human reason and Utilitarianism is based on reason and experience. Utilitarian problem is that the greatest happiness for most people is to sacrifice a few people. Therefore, doing the maximum number that promotes maximum happiness is not always right. Utilitarianism can best explain in the case of "people who left Omilus". The city of Omeras is the ideal utopia. It has everything you might want, but it pays a price. Every Omeria knows their happiness, and the perfect utopia depends on the child. This child must always be trapped in a small room in the basement. Their happiness completely depends on this child's suffering. If you want this child to leave this room, all of these will destroy the city of Omeras.

Introduction One of the main reasons for establishing human rights is to protect everyone's life and public space. The essential characteristic of human rights is that they are equality rights and they are aimed at providing protection equally to all people. These rights are enacted through legislation passed by state and international treaties. Human rights law has evolved over time and has been influenced by many factors including past philosophical theories. The fundamental principles of John Mill's utilitarianism and Emanuel Kant's moral metaphysics suggest different views of the two philosophers about the field of moral philosophy. Compared to Kant 's metaphysical segmentation and its use in proof of validity and error, Mill' s utilitarianism is a more sophisticated ethical theory. Kant takes his confirmation of metaphysical survival as discipline of his moral philosophy. If the law has moral power it will be the foundation. When Kant holds the theory of rationalism, Mill has an empirical theory. Kant is morally ethical in the form he believes, it is necessary for practical judgment of freedom and reason. Utilitarian theory of Miller is a kind of resultism. Because the correctness and badness of behavior depends on the outcome. Kant's pure ethics is the basis of his absolute command and provides the basis for his theory of universal duty. Utilitarian theory of Miller is the main form of resultantism John Stuart Mill and Jeremy Bentham are recognized as founder of Utilitarianism. Contrary to Kant 's moral theory, Utilitarians oppose the majority of Kant' s theory. Kant believes that the intention of action should be considered moral or immoral, but J.S Mill and Bentham say that this is actually the result of actions that determine ethics. Mueller tried to solve the controversy between good and evil through his "utilitarian" theory, his moral theory based on "greatest happiness for most people". Mill thinks that behavior is proportional to the amount of morally correct or created happiness. He defines happiness as happy and painless and believes that happiness is the sole basis of morality.

Emmanuel Kant's "Foundations of Moral Metaphysics" and Johan Stuart Mill's Utilitist Emmanuel Kant and John Stuart Muller are both philosophers. How to form to solve moral problems. In his "moral metaphysics fundamentals" Immanuel Kant mentioned issues based on his belief that human values ​​are inherent in his reasoning ability. John Stuart Mill advocates another point that seems to be controversial to Kant's idea in the book "Utilitarianism". John Stuartmir's "practical" ethical theory and Immanuel Kant's "sorting order" ethical theory. According to utilitarianism, euthanasia is morally justified, and according to Kantism, euthanasia is morally irrational; however, I lead these two positions to their particular position Argued that it is due to a large defect inherent in inference. There is no suitable solution to this problem. According to Utilitarianism, morality is mainly of the kind ... the theory behind Utilitarianism is that if the it does not promote happiness or joy, the behavior of a person that it is wrong promotes happiness and happiness This is the case. The point of this theory is the principle of utility, "maximum happiness to the people who should be the most". (Palmer) Jeremy Bentham basically brought it to the name of Utilitarianism. I pay more attention than those before him Classical utilitarianism is an ethical theoretical approach introduced by philosophers Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill. A scholar like Immanuel Kant of "legal philosophy" in front of them regards punishment as a moral obligation. Kant believes that sanctions are not for the promotion of good but for direct punishment of perpetrators. Classical utilitarianism also shifts the point of punishment to its purpose and result. Based on the Utilitarian approach, sanctions can be justified if sanctions can bring the greatest benefit to most people. Punishment is reasonable if you can prevent you from creating public safety from crime.

Kant's View on Enlightenment The best summary of Kant's enlightenment is in the first paragraph of his thesis, "Answer to the question: What is enlightenment?": Sapere Aude. Please translate it as "know by dare". This sentence is "motto of enlightenment". For Kant, enlightenment means getting out of a voluntary coma. It replaces obedience with rationality and reduces the development of human thinking and natural abilities. Laziness and jealousy prevent people from stimulating themselves. German philosopher Kant summarized the view of "enlightenment in the dark ages" as "a distortion not understood by human thought" (Anderson, 1987, p. 415). Kant was defined as "the rise of mankind from immaturity" in 1784. He declared that "motto of enlightenment" is the father of Sapelle! Please have the courage to use your own understanding "(Elliot and Whitlock, 1992, p. The motto is taken from Horace Kant's View on Enlightenment The best summary of Kant's enlightenment is in the first paragraph of his thesis, "Answer to the question: What is enlightenment?": Sapere Aude. Please translate it as "know by dare". This sentence is "motto of enlightenment". For Kant, enlightenment means getting out of a voluntary coma. It replaces obedience with rationality and reduces the development of human thinking and natural abilities. Laziness and jealousy will stop mankind ... The 18th century was called "era of enlightenment". Trends in thoughts and letters from European to American colonies have brought new highlights and concerns to humanity. This new movement depicts the age of Western philosophy and cultural life. And that claims rationality as the main source and justification of authority. "It is a broad goal to understand rationality and not depend on religious beliefs to understand nature and the status of mankind. What is not so revolutionary is the concept of world history of Emmanuel Kant (1724-1804) from the international perspective (1784). Starting from the historical view of enlightenment, Kant is a journey of rationality and progress of freedom. However, given his epistemology, he could not infer that advances in scopos in history such as Voltaire and Condorc were empirically recognizable in the past. This is not a proofable fact, but it is a necessary condition for the past to be meaningful. The whole merciful character. Historical wars, famine, and natural disasters should be regarded as natural tools, and ultimately will lead people to citizen relationships that maximize freedom and justice.

In a view of a genius as part of criticism of Kant's aesthetic judgment, Kant began to explain what art works are, and by doing so he insisted that "art should be regarded as genius art." (Page 168, "Judgment of Judgment", Emmanuel Kant). Then he continues to prove this and explain the composition of the genius and how to accomplish the work of genius. Kant pointed out that, in order to enable art work, it must have certain rules based on it. In the philosophy of Immanuel Kant, genius is the ability to independently reach and understand concepts that must be taught by others. For Kant, originality is an essential feature of a genius. This genius is a creative talent that can be described as non imitation. Discussions on the characteristics of Kant's genius are mainly included in "criticism of trial" and are welcomed by Romanticism in the early 19th century. In addition, the theory of genius in Schopenhauer, in particular the talent and the theory of liberation from detention, comes directly from Kant's first criticism paragraph. The explanation of Kant's genius points to the romanticism of the 19th century, but verses 48 and 50 emphasize that genius will only produce great art when it tastes. In the absence of "academic justification" that restricts elements of the form of art work, Genius has no meaning of risk. However, genius does not communicate according to established customs, but also includes the originality of "being blessed with artistic rules naturally". In verse 49, Kant said that the soul or soul is not a matter of formality but content matter. When the work suggests that the imagination of the audience "spreads to many similar exhibits", the spirit will exist, as a result the works have rich associations, but they are encapsulated in a specific concept or definition It can not be changed. In short, a genius needs natural talent to express the idea that "I can not speak" through imagination. Kant explains that the genius has four parts. The first part of a genius says it is a genius. Genius can neither learn nor explain, it has essentially it. The second part of the genius is whether something is copied and liked by others. Thirdly, genius can not explain it, it just ended. A genius can not teach it or explain in stages how things are done. The fourth and last step is a way without genius. Because imagination is also necessary, talent is not enough

Kant's basic research on moral metaphysics in "basic engineering of moral metaphysics" suggests that Immanuel Kant, which is good faith, is the only benefit. Moral testing is considered a sorting order. Kant believes that CI can be formulated in several different ways. Expression of universal law b self-termination c. The official of Kant's Kingdom comply with the laws of science as the principle of model rationality. The absolute command introduced in Immanuel Kant's "Ethical Metaphysics Foundation" is the basic concept of Kant's moral philosophy (foundation: From popular moral philosophy to moral metaphysics, part 2). The absolute order includes three statements that are used to determine the moral relevance of any intention or obligation. The first of these statements is to act so that your saying (behavioral norm) can become a universal law. The second method is not just a means but to treat others as a purpose. The third is to live forever in the field of purpose where you can imagine yourself as a legislator or the root of moral law. Kant detailed the moral theory in the moral foundation of "foundation of moral metaphysics" (1785), "Critique of practical reason" (1788), and "moral metaphysics" (1797). The discussion he got from the basic work is his most famous and influential, so the following focuses on them. Kant began his argument from the premise that moral theory must be based on unconditional good things. If something is only conditional and good, that is, if the benefit depends on others, others are only conditional and in that case their good depends on another Things, or it will be good unconditionally. Then all goods must go back to unconditional good deeds. We usually think that there are many good things, but it is not really unconditional. There are many kinds of morality. The most important attempt to build a moral doctrine lies in Emmanuel Kant's "Metaphysics of Morality". He started this work by observing that only goodwill is unconditional. For Kant, nothing is impossible in the world. "It is even impossible, in addition to goodwill it can be regarded as an unqualified good thing." So what are the characteristics of intellectual or good judgment and personality such as perseverance and courage? Kant's answer has no basis for these excellent qualifications. These qualities are considered good in many cases, but they may also be used for malicious purposes.

Kant's moral theory I think that Kant's moral theory is a complement to Utilitarianism because one of the shortcomings of utilitarianism is that it is sometimes impossible to predict the outcome. Kant's second belief is that he thinks "people should not be used, but should be considered as should". Best intrinsic value " Kant's moral theory develops mainly on the idea that ethical behavior and behavior according to reason are one thing. Because it is a reasonable agent (ie due to rationality of practice, interest and goal-oriented rationality), people are obliged to obey the prescribed moral rules for practical reasons. Otherwise it is unreasonable behavior. Kant focused on the responsibility of being a reasonable actor who knows a moral law, so Kant's theory was considered morality (from Greek's "duty" or "duty") Kant's moral theory is the core concept of autonomy. Most readers believe that Kant believes autonomy is a reasonable intention or property of an agent. In Kant's view, understanding the concept of autonomy is the key to understanding and prove that moral requirements are important to our authority. Just as Rousseau's view influences Kant, freedom is not limited by any law and is limited by some law. Therefore, the concept of freedom as autonomy exceeds the sense that it is simply "negative", that is, the sense that it is released from actions outside of you. It initially contains the concept of law developed and enacted by itself, and along with it the law with its own decisive authority This section explained Kant's view (5c) that the structure and content of Kant's moral theory (5a-b), and the beliefs of freedom, immortality of God and the soul are an inevitable "hypothesis" of practical reasons It is aimed to do. (Please refer to 7c below for the relationship between Kant's moral theory and its aesthetic theory.) Kant said, "Foundations of moral metaphysics" (1785) and "Critique of practical reasons" (" He also described his moral theory in detail, also called "criticism". . The discussion he got from the basic work is his most famous and influential, so the following focuses on them.

According to the suicide National Institute of Mental Health seen from the eyes of Kant and Hume, "In 2007, [suicide] was the tenth most death cause in the United States and 34,598 people died." Although numbers are small, it is common for people around you to commit suicide, but this is a big problem (NIMH). About suicide, various emotions and opinions are mixed. Some people choose to believe this is the state of mind that will make people feel suicide. Kant argues that Hume 's view is that mathematical propositions are analyzed? It is totally different. ~ 1 1 If Hume uses Kant's term when discussing Hume, it means that the knowledge of mathematics is a priori! Indeed, as we learned from paragraph 2, this term is not strange for Hume; for CeUsal, Hume says. Regardless of any exception, knowledge of this relationship can not be obtained by a priori reasoning under any circumstances, but when it is found that specific objectives are often combined with each other, is. Make sure that things are presented to those with strong natural rationality and ability; if things are new to him, he will cause some cause or influence by the most accurate test of his reasonable quality You will not be able to find it either. (E 2 7) It is mathematics to rest here The reading I chose from Hume and Kant represents their final view on art philosophy. Hume's taste paper is his last philosophical writing, its existence is coincidental. Hume provided this article when his publisher suggested that his articles about suicide and immortality might be sued, but hoped to fill the gap in a series of articles. Kant read some of Hume's translated works, but Kant never read "preference of preference". Some of the paragraphs of "criminal criticism" sound like a reaction to Hume, which is due to their common influence in British tradition, and an understanding of beauty as a taste. Both studied the work of Shaftesbury's third work Anthony Cooper (1671-1713). They insist that we were born in "introverted eyes" which are particularly suitable for aesthetic sense. From the point of view of Aristotle (or French fries), the uniqueness of the Cant method is not special. As he copes with Hume, Kant is close to this as he did, and one of Hume's first challenges is the origin of "thinking". The problem of the first principle relates to the legitimacy of the proposition, but Hume's empirical approach can be traced back to the first question of the validity of the concepts making up the proposition. Rationalists do not worry about this. For Descartes, any concept that can be considered "clearly and clearly" can be used without hesitation or without doubt. Because the empathicist wants to track all "thoughts" back to experience, we are beginning to ask for credentials certificates.

Kant, Arendt, Mill's moral philosophy: Immanuel Kant claims moral ethics. His theory provides a moral perspective based on the principle of goodwill and responsibility. According to him, people can act perfectly according to good will, regardless of the outcome. In addition, in order to act according to those obligations, laws and absolute orders must be observed. Several other philosophers like Hannah Arendt discussed Kant's moral philosophy. The fundamental principles of John Mill's utilitarianism and Emanuel Kant's moral metaphysics suggest different views of the two philosophers about the field of moral philosophy. Compared to Kant 's metaphysical segmentation and its use in proof of validity and error, Mill' s utilitarianism is a more sophisticated ethical theory. Kant takes his confirmation of metaphysical survival as discipline of his moral philosophy. If the law has moral power it will be the foundation. In moral philosophy, the important features of Kant, Mill, and Aristotle's thinking are three common similarities that collectively make them collective in the analysis of moral theory and philosophy. In his book "Ethical Emotional Construction", Prinz explained that the ideas of Mir, Kant and Aristotle constitute a specific group, including other ideas, when moral philosophy was examined in batches. The groups are compared and compared. An example is to compare Hume's and Nietzsche's methods with the collective similarity of Mueller, Kant, Aristotle. "It is important to confirm that Hume and Nietzsche are doing very different things from Kant, Mill, Aristotle." D. It is wrong. Different perspectives - In many different respects, these three philosophical ways are different In the concept of virtue, differences were found, especially compared to Aristotle, Kant, Mil's moral philosophy. There, Mill and Kant saw the perception of Aristotle's virtue in virtue and concept. A similar position. "For Aristotle, not Kant and Mill but virtue is the basis, which is a crucial difference reflected in their overall theory." Aristotle delivered very good results. Explaining the moral model, explaining morality and pursuing moral life should be helped by other aspects of life like education

Punishment is pain, pain, or loss of revenge. Others also say that this is an "authoritative and mandatory act corresponding to an individual or group that believes it is wrong" (Hugo & McAnany, 2010). Some people wonder the time and the reason we should punish. It is easy to state, but this question is difficult to answer and leads to various punishment modes. In Kant's "moral metaphysics" article he discusses the importance of punishment, the correspondence with crime, the right to punishment and when to give generosity. Emmanuel Kant explains the notion of justice well: "Penalty is derived at least from the three main principles of validity, which must be tied to something appropriate for the individual, in the future a society It is not a goal, not a past goal: "Since judicial does not happen before judicial, the use of artificial intelligence software can break the way of justice.When I think about artificial intelligence, justice, and free will, I First thought is Philip K. Dick and his movie 'Report of the minority'. They are based on the future of "mutant human" with predictive criminal abilities. Everything is perfect: no crime exists because arrests were made in advance before he was detained until the law enforcement officer was wrong Philosopher Immanuel Kant believes that the theory of his justice retaliation is based on logic and reason. The retaliatory position of punishment states that punishment is necessary and that criminal acts are actually reasonable as they should be punished. Kant's rigid guidance of theoretical creation, coupled with the nature of retaliatory justice, totally cleared Kant's critic 's argument that his method would lead to harsh and ineffective judgments. I will use this paper as a means to investigate and solve these claims. The key to defending the death penalty by Kant is "principle of equality" through which the appropriate and advantageous number and penalty for crime is determined. Regardless of whether Kant has the best explanation, the idea behind this generic approach is that it is necessary to punish the culprit with the same pain as the victim: "Eyes for the eyes, teeth Teeth for. However, as people often point out, the literal meaning of Rex Tarionis can not be used as a general principle to combine crime with punishment. This seems to mean that punishment for rape was raped, stolen, stolen, frauded, frauded, attacks beaten, and arson. It is not clear what form or punishment Rex Tarionis permits or demands (eg Nathanson 72 - 75) other crimes - counterfeiting, drug trafficking, continuous killings, massacre, terrorism, genocide, smuggling -

Kant's knowledge theory and the theory of freedom theory began to establish the theory of human understanding in criticism for pure reasons. His approach is to integrate the opposite view of empiricism and rationalism. After Locke and Hume he adopted the principle of experience [1], the basis of our philosophy, that "all our knowledge starts with experience". However, contrary to them, he also includes a reasonable view that there is a tool of human understanding that is in front of experience and is essential for us to have experience. In the 18th century, German philosopher Immanuel Kant developed a knowledge theory in which knowledge about the universe could be a priori or synthetic. According to Kant, knowledge on the universe is synthetic. Because the statement on the universe is not merely the meaning of the word in the statement. In his work Kant refuses the idea that space must be material or relational. Instead, he concluded that human beings do not consider space and time to be objective features of the world, but we have imposed it as part of the framework of organizational experience. One of the most important outcomes of Kant's empirical theory is that the world we are experiencing meets the requirements of empirical possibilities so that it is possible to master the knowledge of the world. Therefore, Kant thinks that the object can only be known if the object can be given in the experience. This aspect of the subject's epistemological state requires several important research areas, and although we wish for knowledge it is not the case. Most importantly, Kant believes that the philosophical exploration of 'super know' things which is not part of the metaphysical transcendental, experience world shows the deadline of philosophy. (Note: There is a subtle, but important difference between Kant's "transcendence" and "transcendence" terms. "A priori" explains the conditions of empirical possibilities. Modern knowledge theory was introduced with his "critic system" by famous philosopher Emmanuel Kant. Some authors believe that knowledge is part of the philosophy of the term epistemology, but now it has evolved into independent science. Education of knowledge, organization of libraries, and many other very practical implementations. For me, knowledge theory is the most useful subject at school as it provides me the basis for solving any problems, questions and challenges in my daily life. The way we study and think about knowledge is a tool in our hands.

Kant's basic principle of moral metaphysics The core concept of Kant's moral metaphysics is absolutely commanded. "The concept of objective principles is called instruction (rational) as long as it is will, and the expression of the order is called instruction." (Abbott, 30) Will act in an ethical way It is forced to do. A book report (38,) on Kant's domestic moral metaphysics fundamental principles states, "Your motto seems to be the universal law of nature by your will." This "absolute command" forms the basis of his work "Basic Principles of Moral Metaphysics". Sometimes his sentence is confused, but Kant advocates what his logic is, namely absolute order. Kant divides the book into three parts, and I can imagine a perfect world. Morality is indispensable in our interaction, morality is critically examined, and there is a discussion about reason and passion. This world will be the cornerstone of human achievement. We are at the top of the peak. Why is this? And in today's society, morality is often related to compliance with laws and laws are legislated by politicians, so they are influenced by politics. I chose another book by Kant. That is a rather difficult title. It is the basis of moral metaphysics. But fundamentally, this is an introduction of Kant's moral philosophy. In this case, "introduction" is a misleading term. Because it is an uncontrollable reading - everyone can not say that it is easy. However, it explains the fundamental principles of Kant's moral philosophy. As I returned to what I said earlier, much of the material of the first basic work was in criticism. It is interesting to see the relationship between the two works. How could a book that should have been fundamentally moral be purely rational criticism? The answer is very relevant to the conversation we have done. Kant recognizes the importance of morality and he recognizes the importance of fulfilling responsibilities according to the distinction between good and evil and living life.

In Aristotle's ethics, the ultimate game of the individual is to realize Udaemonia by fully realizing his possibilities and living a good life. As I thought that the concept of eudaimonia was very interesting, I noticed that many moral theories regard happiness as a moral measure and that Kantism is not so. He is an excellent theorist. Kantoism is a philosophical theory created by a man named Emmanuel Kant. According to Emmanuel Kant or Kantism, his theory emphasizes the modern position and deals with spiritual philosophy, epistemology and ethics. - On September 3, 1929, James "Whitey" Bulger was born into an Irish American family in Dorchester, Massachusetts (traditional.com, 2015). As the first child of the six children, White is not usually a noticeable feature, especially as parents continue to produce more children as they get older. As he and his brothers grew, it was clear that the intelligence of White was different from that of young boys. Korsgaard is more interested in the perspective of non-ideal Kant and ideal Kant of Kant. If all of us live in a society that keeps the rules and has good intentions, the ideal Kant theory is a way that we are obliged to be allowed to act. This theory explains how to request defects and incomplete, but excellent people to show each other. On the other hand, the non-ideal Kant theory differs from each other. It explains the actions that we need to show, although many of us have in good faith Utilitarianism and Kantian Ethics can be defined as "consciously reflecting our moral belief, with the aim of improving, expanding or completing these beliefs in some way." Two theories on the essence of human ethics In this article, I explain how and why Kant's moral theory and utilitarianism differ, why Kant's theory thinks to provide a more rational ethical assertion I will explain. Replacing Natural Law Theory and Social Contract The sanctity of government authority and individual rights is based on measuring its usefulness or happiness. As an egalitarian doctrine, everyone has equality of happiness, utilitarian rationality and relatively direct nature provide an attractive model for democratic governments.

Good things are good, but you have to do it for the right reason. Aristotle and Kant are two famous philosophers with different ethical theories. The theory of virtue and duty depends not only on laws and duties but also on internal matters. Morality comes from inner strength, personality, and how we bring life to the utmost. Aristol 384 - 322 b.c. e Aristotle conceptualizes one area of ​​philosophy, contributing to the theory of logic, metaphysics, ethics, political philosophy (p. 237). Kant's moral ethics and Aristotle's virtue ethics can easily be distinguished by recognizing that Kant is interested in acting from the principle of responsibility and morality, or recognizing that people believe that morality is correct Philosophers believe widely. Although Aristotle's method completely lacks the special concept of this moral motivation, it is not good to argue that good people are morally obliged to act in the same way as the Kan Tians It is rational. In other words, there is no sense of responsibility in virtue ethics. For example, the new Aristotle (such as Hursthouse 2010) contests a common view while arguing that Aristotle's approach not only has a strong moral motivation, but also that good people can meet demand It was. . From the perspective of Kant's moral representative's duties Aristotle, Emmanuel Kant, John Stuart Mill's Ethics The most eloquent interpretation of Aristotle's ethical theory is called Nicola Ethics in his notorious work. I will learn. Among them, one can learn his main concern. It is to prove that morals are mainly related to the concept of "purpose" (or purpose). Aristotle wants all human activities to achieve "purpose" or "good" that it pursues. G. "In medicine, this is health, strategic victory, house in architecture" (Nicomachean Ethics, 7)

John Stuart Mill criticized Immanuel Kant and his Classorical Imperative. What he says is that nobody will adopt the result that they generally adopted. "If that is accurate, this is a debilitating critique of Kant's moral theory. The fundamental principles of John Mill's utilitarianism and Emanuel Kant's moral metaphysics suggest different views of the two philosophers about the field of moral philosophy. Compared to Kant 's metaphysical segmentation and its use in proof of validity and error, Mill' s utilitarianism is a more sophisticated ethical theory. Kant takes his confirmation of metaphysical survival as discipline of his moral philosophy. If the law has moral power it will be the foundation. When Kant holds the theory of rationalism, Mill has an empirical theory. Kant is morally ethical in the form he believes, it is necessary for practical judgment of freedom and reason. Utilitarian theory of Miller is a kind of resultism. Because the correctness and badness of behavior depends on the outcome. Kant's pure ethics is the basis of his absolute command and provides the basis for his theory of universal duty. Utilitarian theory of Miller is the main form of resultantism Both Kant and Mill's ethical theory suggest basic basic principles. With this, any moral actor can test his actions and judge the validity and error of that morality. In Kant's system, the central moral concept is the responsibility and the inner human values ​​are autonomy and dignity, all derived from the essence of rational human nature. Muller builds his theory based on empirically determined human perceptions and goal-oriented behavior that humans can observe when pursuing happiness and avoiding pain and suffering. The basic concept of morality discovered by Kant and Mill seems to be necessary for a complete explanation of our common moral sentiments and beliefs. In addition, they all provide a general principle that we can include specific actions and dependent moral rules to test their moral acceptability and effectiveness.

The classification order was designed by Emmanuel Kant to provide a set of maxims (or motives) that must be passed to make the behavior moral obligations. When establishing a classification order, it is a moral obligation to enforce litigation under any circumstances. According to Kant, the main motivation of an individual should always be the obligation to carry out this action, because we can use our reasons to decipher our obligations. Logically, it must be part of a moral actor, since human inference ability is to interpret ours from animals. Rationality is objective and universal for humans, and is therefore a reliable and reasonable basis of moral theory. Classification instructions are determined by referring to three recipes. The first expression, the law of nature, claims to act "only based on generalizable motto". This means that the principle must be able to be executed universally without inconsistency. If this is impossible, it can be logically assumed that behavior is immoral as it is contrary to reason. If governance is not universal, others can not adopt the same moral principle freely. The second formula (self-termination formula) guarantees that you do not take "others or yourself as a means by any means, always for purpose". The only way to use someone else for other purposes is to use their rationality. Finally, "the expression of the kingdom at the end of the year" is required to "act like a legislative member of the universal kingdom". It may not be possible to live in this world, but we must act like us. According to this formula, we must assume that everyone follows the rules you established through actions. If the intended action passes all expressions, this is absolutely necessary, so it is not only correct but also a moral obligation. The moral system of Emmanuel Kant was built around the sorting order. Classification order is a universal and absolute ethical standard. These orders build moral ethics, or what Kant calls "moral order". According to him, they must be applied to all situations, every situation. The decision does not change according to the situation. The order of classification is an important feature of the Kant 's order and he believes that true morality depends only on the principle of guiding behavior, not depending on the final result. Kant thinks morality is absolute and proofable; the right thing can be determined by putting actions or maxims into the equation. Kant is known for his theory, has a moral obligation, it is called "sorting order" and comes from the concept of responsibility. Kant defines the requirement of the moral law as "absolute order". Classification orders are essentially valid principles and they are effective on their own, and if our actions are to comply with moral law, they must be kept in all situations and circumstances not. Classification commands provide tests that can evaluate ethical descriptions. Kant pointed out that moral means and purposes can also be applied to absolute orders and can use appropriate "means" to pursue a "purpose" with reasonable existence Did. Order to make a hypothesis based on physical needs or the end of needs. Absolute orders can be based only on "their own end", ie the end is not a means of other needs, desires or purposes The purpose of this reflection is to clarify Kant's instructional interpretation of absolute order and assumption and to criticize this ethical theory. Emmanuel Kant interprets the absolute order as an ethical act and needs to obey the motto "You can simultaneously make it a world-wide rule" (4: 421). Kant believes it is almost self explanatory, because it believes that action is morally permitted only if it becomes a law that everyone must comply. In understanding this concept, it is also important to understand Kant's meaning accurately through classification of terms and commands. Kant expresses the order as "the official of command" (4: 413), and all instructions are expressed as "should" o

Kant's analysis of purely reasonable criticism against my theory is to study Sorpsicism and to see how Immanuel Kant's transcendental idealism is affected by egoism. After that we will briefly review the devastating impact that this claim has given Kant's position. After doing sole litigation, I will use Kant's point of view to explain clues that may potentially deny that assertion. The problem of loneliness theory seems universally rejected as the basis of metaphysics, so it is interesting. Criticism of Emmanuel Kant's pure reason Emmanuel Kant's "critique of pure reasons" is mainly considered as one of the most influential philosophical texts of history. Kant's text is one of the most important books for those interested in philosophy by exploring their knowledge and reasons, their scope and limitations, their perception of space and time. Upton Sinclair's Jungle. Upton Sinclair began writing a novel about American immigrant life in the early 20th century, but it emphasized the unsanitary custom of the meat processing industry, so the jungle eventually became more popular. Sinclair makes a great contribution to the reform of the US Meat Testing Law, by drawing countless healthful breaches and stories about unjust treatment and remuneration for migrant workers. Over time, he gained more recognition by influencing standardized wages. In a series of chapters entitled "Transcendental Dialecticism", Kant advocates an analysis of his critique of transcendental illusions and transcendental metaphysics. This section summarizes Kant 's most important argument in dialectic. Kant argues the metaphysics of the soul - what he calls "rational psychology" - in a purely reasonable side job

Kant argues that good intentions are the greatest purpose of the existence of a person. It assumes a conscious universe in which the organizational existence and the purpose of its value criterion can be extracted from its review of constitution and talent. This premise is logically consistent with Kant 's other moral theory, but it does not match what we really are actually observing. Kant detailed the moral theory in the moral foundation of "foundation of moral metaphysics" (1785), "Critique of practical reason" (1788), and "moral metaphysics" (1797). The discussion he got from the basic work is his most famous and influential, so the following focuses on them. Kant began his argument from the premise that moral theory must be based on unconditional good things. If something is only conditional and good, that is, if the benefit depends on others, others are only conditional and in that case their good depends on another Things, or it will be good unconditionally. Then all goods must go back to unconditional good deeds. We usually think that there are many good things, but it is not really unconditional. I chose another book by Kant. That is a rather difficult title. It is the basis of moral metaphysics. But fundamentally, this is an introduction of Kant's moral philosophy. In this case, "Introduction" is a misleading term. Because it is an uncontrollable reading. It can not be said that everyone is easy. However, it explains the fundamental principles of Kant's moral philosophy. As I returned to what I said earlier, much of the material of the first basic work was in criticism. It is interesting to see the relationship between the two works. How could a book that should have been fundamentally moral be purely rational criticism? The answer is very relevant to the conversation we have done. Kant recognizes the importance of morality, he recognizes the importance of fulfilling responsibilities according to the distinction between good and evil and living life. Although Kant 's main work on morality is narrowly thought out, moral metaphysics including "rights doctrine" and "virtue theory" (1785), practical rational criticism (1788), moral metaphysics (1797) It is the basis of. Other works indispensable to Kant's moral philosophy include not only student notes on lectures, criticism of judicial rights (1790), religion at purely reasonable boundaries (1793), and anthropology. We provide ethics and various essays on history and political philosophy such as "Guess the beginning of human history" (1786) and "Toward eternal peace" (1795).

What if a small old lady with an absolute command philosophy of Emmanuel Kant's philosophy saw that he was slowly walking in a lively street without forgetting what he was looking in both directions? Most people answer they run to the street to save her. But why do these people do this? Rescue workers may not have anything to do with a small old lady, but they still decided to endanger her life. It is due to the basic and natural instinct. Whether the rescuer quickly reacts to what he / she sees, and allows his reaction to take over his body. Emanuel Kant's moral system was built around the sorting order. Classification order is a universal and absolute ethical standard. These orders build moral ethics, or what Kant calls "moral order". According to him, they must be applicable to all, all situations and all occasions. The decision does not change according to the situation. The order of classification is an important feature of the Kant 's order and he believes that true morality depends only on the principle of guiding action, not depending on the final result. Kant believes that morality is absolute and provable; the right thing can be determined by putting actions or maxims into the equation. Kantism is a philosophy based on Immanuel Kant's ethics, epistemology and metaphysical writings. Kant is known for his moral theory, and there is a moral obligation, a "classification order" arising from the concept of responsibility. Kantian believes that all actions are carried out in accordance with certain basic principles and we believe that absolute orders must be observed in order to make actions ethical. To put it briefly, the test is necessary to disseminate maxims (imagining everyone acting like this) and then see if the world adage can still be executed consistently. In the basic work, Kant raised an example of a person trying to borrow instead of repaying the money. If this is a universal action, he knows that he will never be repaid, so nobody can borrow money, so this is a contradiction. Emmanuel Kant thinks that the moral law is absolute and creates classification orders. Since Kant believes that people can not kill, unmanned vehicles will never choose to kill. I believe that unmanned vehicles will be safer, more regulated and more predictable if they follow the sorting order. We have developed artificial intelligence to make us smarter and more useful; A. I. can now perform very difficult tasks on a human-like level. Many people are concerned about artificial intelligence, and many others are introducing artificial intelligence as soon as possible; however, both know that it is coming. This technology is here and it is very capable, but people are not ready to jump on a fully automated car. This change is an ambitious step. To say that this is a big step for humanity, it will be an extremely discreet expression. Harry Surden and Mary-Anne Williams of the University of Colorado say the following in "opacity of technology, predictability and automatic driving vehicle".

In the second example, Kant believes that we must guess that each event must be assumed to be determined by a prior event based on causality. There are many explanations in this discussion, but I can not prove that it is valid. In this article, I explained this discussion myself. I gained insight by Robert Paul Wolff. In Kant's argument, since Kant is usually explained, it is necessary to assume that the causal decision of each event is not that it is necessary to impose the "necessary" and "irreversible" chronological order on the representation of the state of the object there is. Create comprehensive representative It is really important to distinguish between the general principle of Cant's causality and the specific causality determined in the second analogy. Equally important, Kant's specific causal relationship is a comprehensive post-incident rather than a comprehensive pre-case (at least in most cases). However, it does not mean that Kant agrees with Hume as to the status of synthetic post - causal law. Conversely, Kant clearly states that in Prolegomena, Paragraph 29 (as we have seen), in paragraph 29 (he made his official "Hume the answer") there is only a fundamental difference between "heuristics" I am talking about. The illuminance of the sun and the true objective law (the sun is the light that passes through it and the cause of the heat) is derived by adding an a priori concept that is due to a simple induction law. In this case (A 91 / B 124): In the second example, Kant believes that we must guess that each event must be assumed to be determined by a prior event based on causality. There are many explanations in this discussion, but I can not prove that it is valid. In this article, I explained this discussion myself. I gained insight by Robert Paul Wolff. In Kant's argument, since Kant is usually explained, it is necessary to assume that the causal decision of each event is not that it is necessary to impose the "necessary" and "irreversible" chronological order on the representation of the state of the object there is. Create comprehensive representative

The classification of Kant argues that Emmanuel Kant is a German philosopher who lived in the late 18th century and is definitely one of the best thinkers ever. He proposed a moral guide that directly opposed moral theory. Many people use his morality as a guide to moral life. The subject I discuss is the absolute command of Kant and the concept of Utilitari's greatest happiness. Both ideas have big problems. However, it is clear that alternatives to these two contradictory thought schools are offered. The most famous classical moral evidence is Kant 's "absolute order". Basically, Kant says it can "act on its motto, but at the same time turn it into a universal law." If you legalize marijuana, you say this should be a universal law. Paying attention to the value of a moral assertion is not an outcome but an action itself (legalization), and it is decided whether action is ethical. If the general law is "You do not kill", it is immoral, so people will not kill. If the common law is "legalization of marijuana", you need to say what motivation is: people are high (and perhaps more happy), reduce crime, allow more freedoms, etc. Strict moralists will consider the legalization of plants to be completely ethical; or at the very least, such behavior should not be interpreted as immoral. Explain how the theory of classical morality and morality ethics solves the ethical and moral issues in legalizing marijuana. Emanuel Kant's moral system was built around the sorting order. Classification order is a universal and absolute ethical standard. These orders build moral ethics, or what Kant calls "moral order". According to him, they must be applicable to all, all situations and all occasions. The decision does not change according to the situation. The order of classification is an important feature of the Kant 's order and he believes that true morality depends only on the principle of guiding action, not depending on the final result. Kant believes that morality is absolute and provable; the right thing can be determined by putting actions or maxims into the equation. Kant is known for his theory, has a moral obligation, it is called "sorting order" and comes from the concept of responsibility. Kant defines the demands of the moral law as "absolute order". Classification orders are essentially valid principles and they are good on their own and if our actions are to comply with moral law they must be kept in all situations and circumstances not. Classification commands provide tests that can evaluate ethical descriptions. Kant pointed out that moral means and purposes can also be applied to absolute orders and can use appropriate "means" to pursue a "purpose" with reasonable existence Did. Order to make a hypothesis based on physical needs and needs end. Absolute commands can only be based on "their own end", ie the end is not a means of other needs, desires or purposes

In the first part, he directed attention to commonsense ethics. Functions such as wisdom and wisdom help to make rational decisions that brings the best results but if you rely only on good intentions, responsibility alone is not enough to judge actions, so it is not moral Mental or moral. In the second part, Kant changed the view of moral philosophy into a metaphysical study of morality. In this part alone, reasonable human nature helps people recognize the morality of action. From a moral point of view, Emmanuel Kant opposed suicide on the basic principle of moral metaphysics. According to the second statement of his explicit order, Kant believes that those who are considering suicide should ask their own question whether their actions are consistent with the essence of human beings. We argue that people are morally considering whether they are willing to generalize their behavior. Kant said, "I think we need to think about ourselves as a means of choosing suicide, he said," I can not use it as a simple means, but I always need to consider it as my purpose in every action There is. " I am immoral. A book report (38,) on Kant's domestic moral metaphysics fundamental principles states, "Your motto seems to be the universal law of nature by your will." This "absolute command" forms the basis of his work "Basic Principles of Moral Metaphysics". Sometimes his sentence is confused, but Kant advocates what his logic is, namely absolute order. Kant divides the book into three parts, and I can imagine a perfect world. Morality is indispensable in our interaction, morality is critically examined, and there is a discussion about reason and passion. This world will be the cornerstone of human achievement. We are at the top of the peak. Why is this? And in today's society, morality is often related to compliance with laws and laws are legislated by politicians, so they are influenced by politics.

Criticism of Kant's object analysis by Schopenhauer Schopenhauer clearly shows that he appreciates Kant's transcendental idealism. His criticism of pure reasons is a genius work [2]. But Schopenhauer believes that Kant commits many mistakes in formulating his philosophy and criticizes Kant's philosophy of discovering them. . In this article, if you want to understand how we understand the reality, since this is an important factor, I would like to analyze the criticism of Kant's decision. Kant's work is a source of inspiration from German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860). Schopenhauer followed Kant in many details but he criticized Kant's philosophy because the different aspects of Kant's philosophy are not completely compatible with himself. This includes Kant's absolute order. To Schopenhauer, Kant's absolute order is simply simplified to the principle of egoism, that is, "you should not do something you do not want others to do." For the sake of explanation, Schopenhauer believes that human behavior is sometimes through others. I am guilty of sympathy for other times. Please worry about your own selfishness or selfishness. He thinks that true moral behavior must be sympathetic, but Kant 's denial of sympathy is a legitimate incentive behind this behavior. Compassion is a common feeling or consideration of us and other people. Like other emotions such as happiness and self-love, sympathy focuses on specific people and specific situations. Arthur Schopenhauer was strongly influenced by Kant 's transcendentalist idealism. Like G. E. Schulze, Jacoby and his former Fichte, he criticized Kant's theory on things themselves. They do not believe that things are the reason we observe, and we are completely inaccessible. Since the first "Critic's review of pure reasons" philosophers criticized Kant's theory of things themselves. Many people believe that this kind of thing exists outside of experience, it can not be thought that it will affect our causal relationship. It is because we need to broaden the category of "causality" beyond the field of experience. For review of this and related literature, Henry Ellison 's Kant' s transcendental idealism revision saw "self" and "emotional problem". For Schopenhauer things do not exist except for irrational will. As Schopenhauer is, the world is a struggle, basically an unconscious will. Another way is Arthur Schopenhauer's criticism of Immanuel Kant, "Kant's philosophical criticism". However Schopenhauer can not be the first scholar that Kant separates the most common form of my phenomenon, but arguing "reverse, kind" behavior is unrelated to a reasonable life There are even things that go against the reasonable convenience of Machiavellian. "It is safe to say that Schopenhauer wrote to Kant at the beginning of this article is worthy of respect: for example, the perfect masterpiece of a truly amazing idea always has a profound and powerful influence all over humankind Can not calculate.The range that far a century and the enlightenment of the nation is achieved.It is always the case.Age does not matter to the masterpiece itself no matter how mature and rich it is, genius always like a tree on the soil It stands on and is rooted in it.

Kant's ethics may be most suitable for modern business. Kant said that correct behavior based on a series of ethical rules should be consistent with these rules and that some other kind of behavior is morally prohibited. He also suggested that people should "respect and use their own ways as a means, not just as a means of other purposes". On the contrary, Mill's morality only focuses on the majority of happiness rather than responsibility itself. Therefore, how can Kant 's "tough" system satisfy business needs rather than Moore's flexible business ethics? The fundamental principles of John Mill's utilitarianism and Emanuel Kant's moral metaphysics suggest different views of the two philosophers about the field of moral philosophy. Compared to Kant 's metaphysical segmentation and its use in proof of validity and error, Mill' s utilitarianism is a more sophisticated ethical theory. Kant takes his confirmation of metaphysical survival as discipline of his moral philosophy. If the law has moral power it will be the foundation. According to these two studies, the big difference between Mill and Kant is in the gradual change in morality. In Kant's scientific metaphysics, a person can still be regarded as a moral honesty though he is still selfish. Under Mill's utilitarianism, if a person is selfish, he can not be said to be morally correct. Because Muller's ethical theory requires humans to spread happiness to others. "Everyone has the privilege to be able to enjoy their life, when they give up they help to increase the amount of happiness of the world" (Mill ch II). Kant denies Utilitarian views, points out that there is a disagreement between desire and morality, and human rights thinking will evaluate cumulative utility. Kant believes that everything that exists has price or dignity. He added that one with a price can easily be replaced with something of similar value, but one with dignity can never be replaced. SK understands ethics under the influence of Kant. Morality itself is universal, and the purpose of moral life style is to harmonize and resign individuals and specific individuals. Please compare this with the statements on the terms of Kant's ethical behavior. Use only maxims that can be universal laws. Since moral life is a settlement between individuals and universality, it is impossible to enter into a form of religious life from ethics. The existence of moral people is universal. SK analyzed the two forms of religious beliefs described below, but we are limited to considering the identity and belief of true religious life. Moral life is a kind of settlement. Faith life is life in public opinion

Kant's practical dilemma on the difference between morality and politics on perpetual peace In Appendix 1 to the Kant's political book, Kant solved the adjustment between political moral theory and political realism theory to achieve permanence . In fact it is a dilemma of peace. Kant explained that permanent peace is achieved only by reasonable means, not mandatory or political convenience. ) Kant's view on international relations shows the same tension between the principle and the facts. Kant believes that a state of peace is necessary for morality. However, this situation only occurs when a series of impossible political conditions come into force. In order to realize sustainable peace, all countries must have Republican Constitution, participate in domestic alliances, abolish resident troops, refuse to undertake national war debt under some other conditions There is no doubt. We can not expect existing governments to establish these conditions based solely on their own but there is a historical objective theory (Kant argues), but they may appear . War plays a central role in this process. It is under the threat of war to know that humans form government and that the Republican Constitution is most effective in dealing with internal and external dangers. Therefore, the country will avoid war to pursue wealth more effectively. The political regime is brought about by the evil elements of the human constitution, but Kant wants that these institutions can have some healing effect on their subjects. As he wrote in "Permanent Peace": "Good constitution is not expected from morality, but good moral conditions of humans can only be expected under good constitution". The gap between the moral world and the political natural world can never be completely closed. Kant's morality depends on intention. If they act only on the grounds that the devil 's tribe is moved by their own interests, their country will not be morally good. They just behave like morality. Morality requires people to comply with their will. In essence, however, it is impossible to distinguish reliability between those who act responsibly and those who follow natural trends.

Kant's Enlightenment and the Evolutionary Evolution Model Kant's article "Answer to questions: What is enlightenment" has a very optimistic view on the future of mankind. He defined the enlightenment as "the rise of a man from his own immaturity" (p. 54). This means that he believes that most people in the world lack reasonable immaturity. This itself is not a bad thing. He believes that the natural progress of mankind necessarily necessitates the ultimate rationality. Kant 's revelation advances society through free activities of rational thought and intellectual evaluation. In the age of enlightenment, the public will be able to manage the freedom they give. However, Kant argues that we live in "the age of enlightenment", not living in "the age of enlightenment". Through this statement, he means that the era of enlightenment will be the era when we overcome all self-monitoring. Also in his article, Kant distinguishes official and private rationality. He said, "The reason for the public use of a person must always be free, it can only bring human understanding." In doing so, the author makes progress in public use of the reason I believe there is. Kant believes that rational personal use can be regarded as "a specific civil status that was left to him or a reason to use it in the workplace." The traditional model of enlightenment of Ferrone comes directly from Voltaire. He was one of the first to recognize that the Enlightenment is a unique movement; he uses the word Lumiere to explain philosophers who tried to progress through criticism. The whole book will master art, science, and, most importantly, literature. These enlightened people have major social functions: criticisms in the name of progress. When Kondell said: "Our age is the era of criticism that everyone must accept." Kant summarized Voltaire's view. The ultimate goal of this important movement is to create reasons to improve society, and Kant said that this reason must withstand the test of 'free and open exams'.

Kant 's moral theory seems to be the most viable in determining the role of a person in a moral situation. The basis of his theory may be the most noble, as it is morally correct to act morally. Even if it is ambiguous or rigid, his idea works easily and efficiently in most situations. There are a few exceptions, but by watching how the real situation is presented and how it is handled, the strength of these exceptions can be slightly reduced. One of the main criticisms of Kant's moral theory is that it focuses on rational autonomy. Critics emphasize that Kant 's moral theory does not have a morally independent significance for those who do not have the ability to do rational autonomy. This suggests that in theory it suggests that all human concerns need to be incorporated into ethical considerations. For example, consider the following scenario. You have an immortal candy, two children in front of you want a candy. Both have the goal of wanting candy. It seems reasonable (they all want to enjoy candy). But even if you give it to child A, child B can not help you earn candy, which is your goal (or enjoy candy). In existential Kant ethics, moral principles essentially lead to the intentional behavior of real people. Therefore, this is a hierarchical interpretation of the theory of the moral principle of ontological Kant that I am speaking, not only because in principle itself must be classified like this in principle, but also because of their intentional will It is also a psychological realization. Agents have the same base hierarchy. At the three levels of Kant's moral principles, the lower level or type of principle is based on all principles of higher level or type. In addition, the principles occurring at each level are logically semantic and are normatively equivalent to all other principles occurring at that level. Rational human condition 4, Kant Ethics and the existence of human: study of moral philosophy - Section 2.3, a way to solve the moral dilemma problem Based on Kant's ethical principles described in the first part of this article, the moral value of behavior does not depend on expected results, moral action comes from the right motives, which is "good". Will or 'duty to approve'. Kant believes that the morality of our behavior has nothing to do with the outcome, but it is related to our intent. To Kant, "It is related to our intent and reasons for action, all of these relate to the principle we depend on." Therefore, the rationality of the means can not be proven.

Immanuel Kant is one of the most challenging and funny people among many intellectuals who provide answers to moral, spontaneous, and understanding questions. Since their initial vision and publication, his work has been used as the basis for analyzing contemporary works of each era. Using Kant 's philosophical framework, Benjamin' s view on the law, J. Rowling's ethics, ethnic research, and modern basic morality are discussed. (Grey, Mack, Newton, Wolosky) Through Franz Kafka's short story "In the Criminal Colony", I would like to include this maturity related to enlightenment through Kant's "Answer the Question Answer" I intend to extend it. Kantoism is a philosophical school based on the work of major German idealist philosopher Emmanuel Kant and his subsequent research on his research. In the age of enlightenment from the late eighteenth century to the early nineteenth century, it was centered in Germany. Kantoism also recognizes Kant's position in epistemology, mental philosophy, political philosophy, and (especially) ethics, and his metaphysical idealism, but to a certain extent it is synonymous with German idealist movement. It is closely related to romantic exercise Kantoism is the philosophy of German philosopher Immanuel Kant, born in Königsberg, Germany (now Kaliningrad in Russia). The term cantianism or cantism can refer to a contemporary position in spiritual philosophy, epistemology, and ethics. Cartesianism is an extension of "myths" from Casshena Theon, "a god at a time". Kierkegaardianism is a set of philosophical, theological and psychological positions based on the works of Denmark's philosopher Soren Kilkegau in the 19th century. Kierkegaard's work focuses on struggle to become a true individual with existing individuals. Kierkegaard's work is the intellectual foundation of "existentialism" of the philosophical movement of the 20th century. Philosophical views of two great philosophers, Albert Coronation and Franz Kafka. The work related to this discussion is the ceremonial expression of Kafka's "transformation" and "outsider." The main focus of the two writers is to find a way to solve his conflict with modern man's dilemma and mechanical and scientific theory. Death, freedom, truth and identity are subjects of study in an absurd meaning. Kafka was born in Prague in 1883. On the surface, he seems to be very led.

In the most general sense, the transcendental deduction of pure understanding of concepts in Immanuel Kant's "critique of pure reasons" explains how the concept of understanding the power of objects through expression is called understanding. The object is linked. . Kant believes that the foundation of all knowledge is self, our own consciousness. Because experience is impossible without self. The purpose of this paper is to explain Kant's interpretation of the concept of pure understanding and to show that our concept is not a mere empirical concept but a transcendental concept. Criticism of Emmanuel Kant's pure reason Emmanuel Kant's "critique of pure reasons" is mainly considered as one of the most influential philosophical texts of history. Kant's text is one of the most important books for those interested in philosophy by exploring their knowledge and reasons, their scope and limitations, their perception of space and time. Upton Sinclair's Jungle. Upton Sinclair began writing a novel about American immigrant life in the early 20th century, but it emphasized the unsanitary custom of the meat processing industry, so the jungle eventually became more popular. Sinclair makes a great contribution to the reform of the US Meat Testing Law, by drawing countless healthful breaches and stories about unjust treatment and remuneration for migrant workers. Over time, he gained more recognition by influencing standardized wages. Emmanuel Kant's "Critique of Pure Reason" was first announced in 1781 and again revised again in 1787. This represents a big intervention to what is later called philosophy of the mind. Kant's first criticism is widely regarded as one of the most important works of Western modern philosophy. Kant is a character whose influence is evident in both the mainland and analytics / English-American philosophy. Kant's work envisions a thorough study of transcendental consciousness or spiritual life through a category of universal consciousness. In Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) Emmanuel Kant German philosopher an influential, the "pure rational criticism" is tied to reason and experience, we are trying to philosophical ones. Discussions between rationalists and empiricists have left. Kant's philosophy affects future German idealists and philosophers such as Shelling and Schopenhauer. John Locke (1632-1704) Locke is a leading philosopher and political theorist who has had a great influence on generous political thought. He is believed to have several ideas like a social contract - you need to get the idea that the government is agreed by rulers. Locke also claims liberty, religious tolerance, and life and property rights. Locke is an influential figure like Jefferson, Madison, and Voltaire for those involved in the American and French revolution.

Kant's Paper: Agnosticism and Non-Temporality In this paper we analyze the relationship between Kant's unknown paper and the non-transitory nature of the object itself. First of all, even though it is natural to assume that agnostic arguments are not inconsistent with non-transitory discussions, this is not enough to avoid another problem, as the former can be thought of as the result of the latter , Ie non-temporary discussion is time to think together with the possibility of substance as space that is insufficient to abolish experience. (Ii) An ontology, ie, an object that may or may not be present, whether it exists or not, is temporary, human beings can not feel, can not perceive, unknown objects. At best it is almost impossible to think through that concept. For Kant, Newtonian mechanics is also a Laplace deterministic on physical properties, and as long as it is correctly described by physics, its mechanism requires natural determinism. Therefore, all practical and possible empirical objects are mechanical and deterministic. But this is all a problem. Only real and potential empirical objects are mechanical and deterministic. Reasonable human condition 3, deep freedom and true personality: metaphysical studies, section 2.3 - Kant's anti-mechanism, cant's anti-mechanism, vitalism, emergence Kant's Paper: Agnosticism and Non-Temporality In this paper we analyze the relationship between Kant's unknown paper and the non-transitory nature of the object itself. Chrysey became Agamemnon's "servant" and Achilles claimed that Brisais was his. Kriseis' father was a priest of Apollo. The priest pleaded with Agamemnon and negotiated and tried to bring back her daughter. It was only Agamemnon that strictly denied his request. "Old man, let us not find you on these boats, stay now or come back later. Garlic wreaths and staff will not use you "Scientifically unknown", "unrecognizable", and "conceivable" are technical terms of Kant. Therefore, in order to understand the criticism of the existence of Kant 's existence as a preliminary one, it is necessary to very easily describe some fundamental Kant' s concepts in epistemology and philosophical psychology. For Kant, "scientific understanding" or Wissen is the same as the true belief that P is reasonably reasonable in a subjective or personal sense (in this case it means "faith" or "evergathering" It is also a target or universal subjective subjective (in this case it is "deterministic" or Gewissheit) (CPR A 822 / B 850) For example, reasonable human animals scientifically 3 + 4 = 7 You can know the preconditions of. Reasonable human condition 5, Kant, Agnosticism, and anarchism: Theology - Political Expo - Part 1, extreme agnosticism, Section 1.2, Kant's philosophical theology and incoherence

For Kant, the morally important thing is not the result, it is the idea when the selector makes a choice. What does it mean not to tilt and act? It does something because it makes you feel better or because you want to get something from it What does "unqualified" behavior mean? Kant said that this means that we should respect moral law Once generalized, it is wrong to use this maxim as the basis of action if it makes sense to conflict itself and it makes no sense. If the general version makes sense, ask if you choose to live in a world that everyone follows. Otherwise, please do not take action Nobody can take that promise seriously if someone can make a "false promise". When things are all over, thief's maxim will overthrow the property system, but without the property system theft does not occur. A fraudster's saying will overturn the assumption of authenticity once promoted, but without this assumption, it can not even tell a lie. Maxim: Even though I can pay it at a very low price, I may refuse to help others who can not pay. Summary: Even if it seldom helps her she can refuse to help others who can not afford her Can you use it as a universal law? Maybe it is not, you may have yourself in extreme need, so no one else will help you Try this motto so that you can pour the oil used on the ground instead of taking it to the oil recycling center to save you time and effort Do not always act, but always take actions that aim for reasons (that is, others). The phrase "actual order" is Jacques Thiroux. Kant himself said that this is another way to state his sorting order. This version of classification command seems to be aimed at eliminating misuse. Utilitarianism is condemned for reasons to misuse people already in disadvantage. Utilitarianism may have to support such a plan if the plan increases the damage of fragile groups, but promotes overall social benefits. In Kant's philosophy, moral obligation is a duty of virtue. His moral outlook is simply "virtue" and moral virtue is "an unavoidable consequence of pure practical reason". In "Critique of practical reasons", Kant explains that "virtue" is naturally acquired as a non-sacred will or as a "moral tendency in struggle". In fact, Kant believes that all objectives are duty, not virtue Incomplete or extensive duty leads us to the establishment of terminal life. Happiness This part will be interesting as we see how and when we must combine our own responsibility and purpose with one's happiness and the completeness of another for morally good I guess. To carry out work Inspector Kant's Ethics Kant's ethical theory is moral. In moral theory, behavior is evaluated as moral or immorality based on duty. Unlike Utilitarianism, Kant's ethical theory involves responsibility regardless of human well-being. Emanuel Kant defines responsibility as "an objective and practical action in accordance with this law and eliminates the tendency to define it as an obligation" (Kant, 1956, p. 83). According to Kant, all actions have maximism

Compare the ethic theory of mills and Kant; this will make the social order better. John Stuart Mill (1808-73) believed that moral theory is called Utilitarianism. There are many expressions in this theory. One of them is that "Everyone acts like this and makes all participants balance the utmost good and evil." But good is a relative term. what would you like. Utilitarians are opposed to this problem. Mill distinguishes between happiness and pure sensory pleasure. He defines happiness with a higher level of pleasure This work focuses on comparing and comparing the ethical issues dealt by Immanuel Kant and Utilitarians Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill. In this article I will explain each work so that readers can understand more easily and discover that research is a rich resource on topics. As far as Kant's morality is concerned, it applies to a kind of zombie that occupies Kant's world. It is a complete and tragic altruism. According to Kant, behavior is moral, as long as behavior has responsibility, not by doing it to gain a certain kind of benefit, behavior is moral and one profit will damage the moral value of action . Emmanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill are philosophers who have solved moral problems in terms of the formation of moral habits. Immanuel Kant advocated a point of view "based on his belief that human value is inherent in his reasonable skill" the basis of moral metaphysics ". John Stuart Miller is thinking ... Show more ... Muller is opposed to "Human complaints are more satisfying than pigs", which is an animal's meaning of human dissatisfaction I am satisfied with the degree of satisfaction, more specifically, "better Socrates is not satisfied with foolish satisfaction." This means that an idiot has only a different opinion, as he does not know the two aspects of the problem. This sentence means that Mill dismissed the concept of "happiness", replaced it with the concept of "happy and painless" and replaced the concept of "misfortune" with the concept of "lack of pain and pleasure" .

Emmanuel Kant's Moral Metaphysical Foundation In his publication 'Foundations of Moral Metaphysics', Immanuel Kant provided the reader with a thesis claiming that morality can be derived from the principle of absolute order did. The most powerful argument to support his argument is the difference between daily work and daily work. To build his thesis, Kant first distinguished experience from 'a priori' concept. The concept of experience is the idea that we get from the experience of the world. Kant, Emmanuel. Foundation of moral metaphysics Cross Lewis Whitebeck, Indianapolis, Bobs - Merrill, 1969. The page number referring to this work is the limit number of Beck referring to the page number of the standard version Königlich-PreußischeAkademiederWissenschaften (Berlin, 1902-38). In Germany, he began an important modern Kant interpreter, and the German idealist movement he began was Dieter Henrich, who has several British works. P. F. Strawson's The Bounds of Sense (1966) played an important role in determining Kant's contemporary acceptance in Britain and the United States. Recent English-speaking interpreters include Luis Whitebek, Jonathan Bennett, Henry Allison, Paul Guya, Kristin Cols Guard, Steven Palmquist, Robert B Pipin, Rogers Crouton, Rudolph McClell and Beatrice Long Enes Immanuel Kant is a German philosopher of the 18th century and is widely known for his accomplishments and works such as "critique of pure reason" and "basic moral metaphysics". Kant developed a moral theory that depends on reason rather than emotion, called moral law. Kant is not anti-religious, but he wants a moral system not covered by religious, emotional or personal interpretation. - Saint Augustine and Aquinas believe that this town is also a moral town. This city will help the physical and mental ransom of mankind. Their mind about fair cities necessarily requires moral law. When it is broken, the law demands punishment. Their thoughts on the justice system can easily lead to religious tyranny. Kant's ethics is based on Emmanuel Kant, "Foundations of The Moral Metaphysics" (1785). He discusses moral decisions based on free will. When acting. His view is regarded as dualism, as it tries to fill the gap between existentialism and contractors. (Stanwick & Stanwick, 2009). One advantage of this framework, regardless of the outcome, is that judgment is at the beginning of the decision-making process. But if you think that action is good at the beginning and the end, the result will have a negative effect, and it may be viewed as a disadvantage as the result is not taken into account.

Comparing Hegel's and Kant's reasoning opinion, "This view is a price of ransom and immediate ransom - not from your own pocket but individual passion" is blacklisted by Hegel as "rational" "(35) In this way, Hegel explains the universal reason, which ensures the end of history in its own consciousness, like Kant, Hegel, like Kant Developed a theoretical history that is moving toward a specific purpose, and this result included a reasonable realization of human events. Hegel was one of Kant's first major critics. In response to Kant's abstract and formal accounts he saw, Hegel proposed a moral concept focusing on the "moral life" of the community. But the concept of Hegel's "moral life" means to include Kant's ethics rather than to replace it. Hegel can be regarded as an attempt to protect Kant's concept of freed beyond reason and limited "desire". Therefore, compared to later critics such as Nietzsche and Russell, Hegel shared some of Kant's most fundamental concerns. Georg W. Hegel's philosophy is another attack on rationality and individualism, fundamentally opposing enlightenment. His philosophy is a partially secularized version of the traditional Jewish - Christian cosmology. Kant is interested in epistemology, but Hegel is centered on metaphysics. For Kant, maintaining faith led him to deny the reason, and for Hegel, keeping the Jewish - Christian metaphysical spirit made him more rational and anti - personal than Kant. Hegel and Kant agreed that realism and objectivity are dead ends. Kant surpassed their previous theme, but from the Hegel point of view, he is too stupid to do so. Kant always takes responsibility only for the world of experience of the phenomenon, so eternal reality is always closed to us. G. W. F. At the summit of German idealism, Hegel accepted Kant's innerism but showed more radical direction. He totally claimed that "philosophy made herself again a woman of faith", but this is not from outside, it is composed of itself. Hegel approved Kant's way of helping the doctrinal emphasis of the Enlightenment against the world of church experience, in particular to help revise the way rock turned philosophy into empirical psychology. But Kant insisted on "limited idealism", but Hegel believed that Kant did not fully expand his idealism. Kant's normative rational opinion is to treat faith and knowledge as irreversible opposition. Hegel believes that further development of idealism indicates that faith and knowledge are absolutely relevant and comprehensive. German philosophy of the 19th century was dominated by Hegel's thought. Hegel's philosophy is based on the concept of idealism. By observing the previous philosopher, you will see that Hegel's philosophy is similar to that of Emmanuel Kant. Kant is very interested in knowledge research. Kant thinks these ideas and concepts are a priori. The idea of ​​Apriori is an idea that exists before people understand the world. In other words, the idea is not empirical. Hegel's philosophy extends Kant's philosophy. Hegel believes that previous knowledge comes from the "Gaist" or the Holy Spirit. According to Hegel, history consists of a series of ideas and arguments. Each paper has the opposite view or the opposite view. Through this contradiction, a new series of ideas and synthesis is born. The synthesis and the opposite of the paper formed the dialectic theory of Hegel. History is a series of arguments or "contrast" that define a new era of history.

Kant's moral principles are based on moral metaphysics and the author Immanuel Kant will form the foundation by rejecting all ethical theories related to the result and then focusing on our moral motives and actions will do. Kant wants to get a good role from the accidental correct behavior. He thinks that everything is coincidental (depending on how it is used, everything may have good or bad values). So he tried to find the highest subject of morality in all his reasoning. In his article, Tannert strives to provide us with reasonable arguments that human reproductive cloning "violates our basic moral principles". He proposed his argument to the central moral principle of respecting all mankind of Immanuel Conde. It is said by a great philosopher: Nevertheless, it is not always meaningful to never end at the same time to other people "(Kant, 1785). Essentially, Kant's principles prohibit the use of reasonable creatures - humans - a tool to achieve their own selfish goals. Tannert claims that human reproductive cloning through somatic cell nuclear transfer or embryogenesis is immoral because it violates this principle with human cloning for selfish purposes. But, as I have proved, this assertion has problems. In addition, although Kant's respect for humanity is of great practical value, it does not provide sufficient guidance on cloning. In Kant's view, the fundamental goal of moral philosophy and basic work is to "find" the fundamental principle of "moral metaphysics" that Kant interprets as a system of transcendental moral principles. CI for human beings of all ages and cultures. Kant completed the project through the first two chapters of the basic work. He analyzes and clarifies the concept of common sense about morality, including the idea of ​​"goodwill" and "responsibility". The purpose of the first project is to present an accurate description of the principles underlying all of our general moral decisions. The judgment of the problem should be ordinary reasonable and adults will accept reasonable reflection judgment judgment. But today, many people think that Kant is too optimistic about the depth and degree of ethical consensus.

What is the difference between Kant's perceptual judgment and empirical judgment? What is the difference? Understanding how thinking works is always a major goal of philosophy and its important part includes how human beings experience the world. Many philosophers tried to study this problem, and Hume successfully proposed a framework that can understand human understanding. But this article has inspired Kant 's philosophical thinking and has led him to awaken from "dogmatic sleep" and to develop a unique framework for defining ideas. Kantoism is a philosophical theory created by a man named Emmanuel Kant. According to Emmanuel Kant or Kantism, his theory emphasizes the modern position and deals with spiritual philosophy, epistemology and ethics. - On September 3, 1929, James "Whitey" Bulger was born into an Irish American family in Dorchester, Massachusetts (traditional.com, 2015). As the first child of the six children, White is not usually a noticeable feature, especially as parents continue to produce more children as they get older. As he and his brothers grew, it was clear that the intelligence of White was different from that of young boys. Immanuel Kant was born in Königsberg, East Prussia in 1724. Kant's grandfather moved from Scotland to East Prussia and even his father spelled their last name as "Cant". Kant's father was a saddle maker (craftsman), Kant was unable to go to the university. Kant's parents belong to so-called pious factions, a strict and devout Christian school, and Emanuel is strongly influenced by this kind of thinking. After graduating from college in 1746, Emmanuel Kant needs to be a mentor of wealthy family children for 9 years. German philosophers Immanuel Kant and Karl Marx's work played an important role in the development of different philosophical religious sects. Emmanuel Kant was born in Königsberg, East Prussia in 1724. Currently, Kaliningrad is a poor household with the reverence of eleven children. Through his study, it is clear that Kant was promoted in the value of religious doctrine and faith, as his theory shows the significant influence of his religious education. Kant is accustomed to being a little boy

In society, morals are defined as beliefs and concepts of right or wrong behavior. (Can you quote a dictionary?) Moral education is also called moral education and depends greatly on individuals that have a great influence on life. These teachings usually start from a young age through parents, caregivers, and social educators. Because they affect the lives of young children, they are responsible for ensuring that young children make sound decisions and learn to contribute to society in a positive way. According to Kant 's existentialist ethics, as I said, morality is the essence of morality. However, more specifically, according to the existential Kant ethics, morality is the fact that what an actual human choice should do (essential), what should not be selected (not permitted), and that it accepts It is about what you can do. The selection is made even if it is not mandatory (permitted). What we should choose is our responsibility. Therefore, according to existential Kant ethics, all morals are inherently related to "moral theory" or responsibility. Rational human condition 4, Kant Ethics and the existence of humans: Studies of moral philosophy - Section 1.0, Existential Kant Ethics, Section 1.1, Ethics, Morals, and EKE The version of Kant's ethic which I developed in this book is "existentialism" in four meanings, the term is frequently used (and many people are abused). First of all, it is a specific human center, a humanitarian version of Kant's ethics, using philosophical anthropics exclusively for ethics, not as an unnecessary addition or just refinement. Secondly, it is fully integrated into the human or real human's rational dynamics, intentional biology, life neurobiology, so that non-reducing naturalist and organicist Kant Ethics is. The principles that guide the choice and behavior of life are absolute and non-instrumental. Third, it is Kant ethics of application and orientation. Because it is particularly suitable for the reality in the real irrational nature and social situation, the real world, the moral problem of "human beings, all human beings". Rational human condition 4, Kant Ethics and the existence of humans: Studies of moral philosophy - Section 1.0, Existential Kant Ethics, Section 1.1, Ethics, Morals, and EKE

Kant's Self-Termination Ceremony Summary: Is Kant's "self-ending formula" too strict? In solving this problem, I drew a common obligation, a moral requirement, not a distributed person but a collective person concept. Then I raised the question of decentralization: how the common obligations of all people are transferred to me. For example, if we have to maximize happiness, I do not seem to have to act at all times to maximize happiness. Onora O'Neill simplifies Kant's moral theory by "self-terminating formula". Using someone simply means "to incorporate them into an action plan they can not in principle agree" (O'Neill 412). The purpose of dealing people is to respect individuals as "reasonable people with their own motto" (O'Neill 412). After understandable interpretation of Kant's ethics O'Neill showed the advantage of cantism over utilitarianism. Kant's absolute leadership continues to occupy an important position in today's moral philosophy, and his most lasting contribution is the law of nature and the expression of his own goals. This is a unique way of looking at the concept of universalization: to develop maxims and to find that contradiction in generalization. The other is a unique way to put morality on the essential value and dignity of man. In the last section we will consider a few of these obstinate problems. Kant stated that each expression "combines two of them" initially indicates that the expression is semantically equivalent, or that at least one can be analyzed from another expression. For example, some of Kant's critics point out as follows. I should always regard humanity as the purpose itself. ; Sensen 2011). But it still doubts whether this strategy captures the full meaning of human formulas or explains all the responsibilities Kant argues (Wood 1999, 2007; Cureton 2013 ).

Kant's three beauty of criticism and Aristotle's poetic summary: I explained that the third criticism necessary for high implicit or potential experience An analysis of beautiful experience, that is, with his own lofty think. Looking beautiful, I am calling the philosophy of sublime beauty. Then I thought about some aspects of Aristotle's analysis of tragedy's poetry, especially to identify key elements of the tragedy accompanied by fear and sympathy experience leading to these emotional catharsis. Kant's aesthetic point of view, the most detailed sentence is displayed in "Trials of Strength Criticism" (1790), which also analyzes its behavior as the title "third criticism" as indicated By doing so, Kant's aesthetic theory is fulfilled. Judgment. In other words, by explaining some things, Kant's judge is a beautiful thing to explain what is beautiful. In this chapter I will explain the beauty and sublime aesthetic judgment structure (7a), summarize Kant's artistic theory and the genius (7b) behind the art and finally explain the relationship between Kant's aesthetic theory and his moral theory (7c) Kant's three beauty of criticism and Aristotle's poetic summary: I explained that the third criticism necessary for high implicit or potential experience An analysis of beautiful experience, that is, with his own lofty think. Looking beautiful, I am calling the philosophy of sublime beauty. - One of the influences of Aristotle in the poetry of William Wordsworth and William Shakespeare Aristotle's poetry was not his main work though further literary research and criticism had a major impact. In this work, Aristotle outlined and discussed the number of basic elements that must adhere to great tragedies and / or poetry writing In this article, we first outline a general explanation on Kant's aesthetics. This allows you to see the first part of his third critique - trial criticism. This will be four moments explained to the judgment explained - "needlessness", "selfless", "universality", "purpose" and then paper, the main difference between the United States and sublime and elevated types I will explain the concept of sublime Kant. It becomes a relationship between sublime and beautiful and then it will come to a conclusion by studying some of the criticism of Kant 's aesthetic judgment, depending on Kant.

Views on Kant's humanity and rationality "People can regard human history as a hidden natural plan for achieving internality," Kant clearly shows in his concept of human history For him, this is the ultimate development, and humans become countries that contribute to their normal development. Kant believes that the reason is not as a means of further aims, but by itself has a real function of creating goodwill. The ability to infer about humans is not to make him happy, as other instincts will fulfill this goal more effectively, but because of the highest condition that Kant calls responsibility. Because humans are reasonable, they can have true freedom. He fulfills his duty when man acts freely according to reasonable law. Kant believes that there are no exceptions in the responsibility of not lying for two main reasons. Kant believes that human beings include dignity and essential value, free will and moral behavior. The reason why Kant does not tell a lie is based on his view on the intrinsic value of man and the free will. The first reason is about how lies will affect ourselves and the second reason is about how lies will affect others. First, Kant believes that when people tell a lie they are violating their dignity and intrinsic value (Rachels & Rachels, 2011, pp. 137-138). A lie conflicts with his moral, moral, and essential values. Furthermore, lying is likely to be influenced by liars, so it may hinder the ability to make reasonable choices about free will. Criticism of Emmanuel Kant's pure reason Emmanuel Kant's "critique of pure reasons" is mainly considered as one of the most influential philosophical texts of history. Kant's text is one of the most important books for those interested in philosophy by exploring their knowledge and reasons, their scope and limitations, their perception of space and time. Upton Sinclair's Jungle. Upton Sinclair began writing a novel about American immigrant life in the early 20th century, but it emphasized the unsanitary custom of the meat processing industry, so the jungle eventually became more popular. Sinclair makes a great contribution to the reform of the US Meat Testing Law, by drawing countless healthful breaches and stories about unjust treatment and remuneration for migrant workers. Over time, he gained more recognition by influencing standardized wages.

Kant's category rethinks the summary: I used quince's ontological commitment standard, and I thought to oppose Kant's ontological commitment to previous knowledge theory. Kant's general knowledge theory ontology is directly related to the habitual view that it must be based on a priori conditions or expressions of space, time, and categories, whether a priori or empirical. doing. Therefore, this view is accompanied by an ontological habitual interpretation consisting of cant style 'appearance' or 'experience object'. I oppose this view and explanation. How are those possible? Kant said: Like a priori understanding, quantity, quality, relationship and form, through a perceptual of a priori form, through space and time. The latter category does not require our long-term detention. I can say that they are straight jackets in Kant's mind, I think that the world can be combined and divided to make it understandable. But the former form is very interesting. Space and time are said to be a priori perceptual forms. That is, each potential perceptual object can be placed against other temporal and spatial objects somewhere in space and time (and therefore not implied, not sacred from the same). I agree with the definition of my colleague 's algorithm, but I do not know if this represents Cant' s category. In my opinion, categories are not algorithms, but a series of deductive concepts that constitute our perception and provide us with a series of things that define human perception and recognition. I do not use "algorithm" in the context of Kant's intuition and category epistemology because that algorithm is a procedure to solve the problem after or after experience. Kant 's comprehensive priority categories such as unity, pluralism, and totalism precede any perception and are not procedures as it is transparent and transcendent with respect to perception.

Utilitarianism and Kant Ethics are part of philosophy and will be studied forever, and like most topics of philosophy, no one will be deemed identical. With so many cultures, there are many different beliefs about people's lifestyle. Religion, poverty and mental health all contribute to our belief in morality. Some people think that these factors should be the mental condition of the person and the motive of the perpetrator when sentences are given. Utilitarianism and Kantian Ethics can be defined as "consciously reflecting our moral belief, aimed at improving, expanding or completing these beliefs in some way". Two theories on the essence of human ethics In this article, I explain how and why Kant's moral theory and utilitarianism differ, why Kant's theory thinks to provide a more rational ethical assertion I will explain. Replacing Natural Law Theory and Social Contract The sanctity of government authority and individual rights is based on measuring its usefulness or happiness. As an egalitarian doctrine, everyone has equality of happiness, utilitarian rationality and relatively direct nature provide an attractive model for democratic governments. In the last semester, I was assigned to write the last essay on utilitarianism and Kant's ethics. I have to study and evaluate the work of two philosophers, Jeremy Bentham and Emmanuel Kant. These two philosophers have studied the essence of morality long ago, and they formed two different theories of moral philosophy. Jeremy Bentham is today known for his principle of utilitarianism and the principle of utilitariy evaluates actions based on these results. He thinks that deed is considered "fair" if that act directly or indirectly brings the greatest happiness and the least suffering to the largest number of people affected. Bentham defines utility as any property in an object that tends to produce utility, beauty, happiness, or happiness, or to avoid the painful and unfortunate events of the party considering the interest. Therefore Utilitarianism is based on an understanding of the correct behavior of the outcome. (Wolf) In order to better understand what is considered "good", a comparison between Utilitarianism, Kant's morality and moral theory of nursing ethics and moral behavior, and these different ways for nature for us Role as a concept of human rights. Morality is based on the motives and intent behind behavior, the morality of action is not a real result, but a moral approach. This concept is based on responsibility and principles and includes human rights issues. Emmanuel Kant believes that there is an obligation to adhere to "good" as a human being in an unconditional sense. It should be good for what seems inherently correct, and hence it should not be changed as someone thinks it is wrong.

Some think Kant's concept of autonomy is necessary to dismiss moral realism and to support 'moral constitutionalism'. However, when reviewing the paragraphs mentioned in moral metaphysics (with the help of Kant's lecture and reflection), the central legislative concept of Kant's autonomy concept is a clear anti-structuralism in his moral philosophy It represents an idea. . I. Summary: Significance of "Kant's Moral Constitutionalism" A. In John Rawls of Justice The choice of the principle of creating justice from the original standpoint of Rawls is "constructive" in "useful meanings" It is expressed as. About "dispute resolution", this idea Constitutionalism in meta ethics thinks that moral truth is determined or determined by the result of real or virtual deliberation or selection procedures. Many of those who interpret Kant as constructurists believe that if the analysis of his "responsibility" and "goodwill" has a moral requirement, the agent they are detaining will have autonomy of will It is said that it shows. O'Neil) 1989; Reath 2006; Hill 1989 a, 1989 b, 2001; Cureton 2013, 2014; Engstrom 2009). In this sense, autonomy means that these entities are both authors of moral law and the subject of moral law, so they are not bound by any external requirement that may exist outside the scope of our intention It means. On the contrary, we only follow the moral requirements that we impose on ourselves by applying our own rationality, independent of natural desires and tendencies. However, the Cantiers in this camp was against the characteristics of this rational process. In this article we will explore the concept of whether Kant is constitutive and his view on this topic. First, I will outline Constructivist and moral realist. From the 19th century of Darwin's theory, human knowledge can no longer provide "truth" for human understanding. Constructivists believe that our moral reasons are not derived from our demands and benefits, they are rooted in a reasonable existence. Morality is universal and is seen as necessary to combine rational creatures. The moral realist believes that there is a moral fact and that our moral opinion on these facts may be accurate or counterfeit. Moral realists tend to be cognitiveists like Christine Korsgaard who actually think Kant is a moral realist. Acceptance of his moral obligation gave him a certain constitutionalism.

As we all live in society with norms and values, humans naturally recognize specific moral ideologies and apply them to our daily lives. Over the centuries philosophers have tried to develop a framework that can be measured based on these moral principles. In this article, John Stuart Mill's moral theory and Emmanuel Kant are trying to solve the moral dilemma. John Stuart Mill argues that his utilitarian hypothesis is to assert that a moral statement can not be proved scientifically or mathematically (West 23). The history of philosophy shows the efforts of great thinkers to develop a reasonable foundation for ethical behavior from Aristotle to Emmanuel Kant, John Stuart Mill, John Dewey, Sydney Hook . They say that ethics can be autonomous and does not require a theological reason. These philosophers emphasize the need for self discipline and moderation in their desires. Plato believes that the soul of a tank consists of three horses - passion, ambition, and rationality - leadership - reasonable people under the control of wisdom are balanced and gentle aristocratic life I believe we can send you. Our goal is to bring out our creative possibilities to the fullest, including our ethical behavior. Men and women can achieve better lives without requiring divinity. If one does not believe in God, "Everything will happen" This is totally wrong. The writing by John Stuart Mill and Emmanuel Kant shows a very different perspective on moral issues. Mill's idea is called Utilitarianism. In this ideology it is a fundamental belief that happiness is the greatest goal and action should be judged by the ability to provide maximum happiness to most people. The dentist Kant believes that this is not the result of action, but the behavior itself. He insists on reasonable moral rules According to these two studies, the big difference between Mill and Kant is in the gradual change in morality. In Kant's scientific metaphysics, a person can still be regarded as a moral honesty though he is still selfish. Under Mill's utilitarianism, if a person is selfish, he can not be said to be morally correct. Because Muller's ethical theory requires humans to spread happiness to others. "Everyone has the privilege to be able to enjoy their life, when they give up they help to increase the amount of happiness of the world" (Mill ch II). Kant denies Utilitarian views, points out that there is a disagreement between desire and morality, and human rights thinking will evaluate cumulative utility. Kant believes that everything that exists has price or dignity. He added that one with a price can easily be replaced with a similarly valuable one, but one with dignity can never be replaced.

Both have elements of quantitative theory, because Bentham has distinctive calculus and Kant has "goodwill + responsibility = ethical behavior". Utilitarianism is the theory of assertion, morality is based on the results and Kant's theory is based on intention (duty) Kant ignores emotions, and Peter Singer says the preference as part of emotion is an important part of ethical decision-making. Militarism can be applied to any situation, and Kant says unethical instructions (hypothesized instructions) are useless. They do not have many sharing theories, they are generally very different theories as they all pay attention to different elements of morality. In 1993, Coward pointed out that there are three ethical theories that can be used to discuss the greenhouse effect. The theory is Utilitarianism, Kant ethics, moral ethics. Utilitarianism This is a well-designed theory that states that people usually take into consideration the harm and interests of their actions. This theory thinks that giving good things is important and extremely useful in our lives, but creating bad things is harmful and it is not needed in our lives Hmm. Theory emphasizes the maximization of social benefits Utilitarianism and Kantian Ethics can be defined as "consciously reflecting our moral beliefs for the purpose of improving, expanding or completing these beliefs in some way". Two theories on the essence of human ethics This article explains how Kant's moral theory and utilitarian differ and why it differs and explains why Kant's theory thinks it brings a more rational morality . Substitution of theory and social contract Place the dignity of government authority and individual rights on its usefulness or measure the happiness it receives. As for the doctrine of equalism, everyone's happiness is equal, rationality of utilitarianism and relatively direct nature provide a model attractive for democratic governments.

Kant's attack on the dihedron of concept of reflection: Inside "negligible" bilateral nature of reflection ", Kant introduced a new transcendental activity which is an a priori review (Kamps smith Reflection "). It is aimed to identify the teacher to which the expression belongs by examining the relationship with the expression.This company has created several powerful ideas (1) It is studied Some of the relationships, especially digital identity are of great interest. The purpose of this paper is to reflect how the following thinkers are studying the concept of subjective cant in modules. I cover the following thinkers and topics in my reflection log: Arendt, Berlin, Fanon, Marcuse, Foucault, Habermas, Rawis, MacIntyre, Rorty and New Materialism. Hannah Arendt is certainly one of the most important thinkers of the 20th century and is one of the most influential people of political subjectivity. A German-born philosopher introduced the term "vita activa" to political subjectivity. She distinguishes three basic human activities, "labor, work, action" (Arendt, 2000 p: 167-181). These conditions are necessary for humans to live on the earth. Labor is defined as the biological practice of the body and an important need for life. Work maintains an "artificial" world (Arendt, 2000), which is very different from everyday environments. Hannah Arendt uses Kant's sensor concept as an aesthetic judgment and imagines other people's judgment as related to political judgment. Therefore, she created the political philosophy of "cant style", and as she said, Kant did not write. In the real world she is often trivial about evil as in the case of people like Adolf Eichmann, and I believe that often includes a lack of consensus and discretion. Arendt and JürgenHabermas also took a similar position on Kant's Mandarin and criticized Lyot as using Kant's Mandarin as the basis for true political judgment. Lyotard also believes that Kant's agreement is an important concept to understand political judgment, not for reaching an agreement, but for the possibility of "pleasing" in "discomfort".

Good things are equal to happiness (satisfaction), or badness is very close to sorrow (dissatisfaction) and does not bring happiness. Utilitarianism is obviously used to determine the best and satisfactory behavioral policy based on a plan pointing to the most favorable channel. We believe that commodities maximized in the current situation will be affected by the way people in society are selected. b) Cost-benefit analysis: Utilitarian decomposes moral law into different quantifiable units interacting to define ethical decisions: the whole fun - the whole pain = the total utility (Lukas 47). Utilitarianism and cantism proposes comparative moral theory, but advocates of both theories frequently reach consensus on many moral and moral issues. Utilitarianism and Kantoism basically pursue a common goal The golden rule is embodied in many religions all over the world. The principle of Utilitarianism and Kantoism differ in their observation method. Immanuel Kant (Kantian) does not affect the results of our actions, but our intent is certainly the truth. Utilitarianism emphasizes the opposition, and the result is certainly important. Utilitarianism also emphasizes that our actions should maximize people's greater happiness. On the other hand, Kanto emphasizes that action should be taken for itself, not for individual interests. Utilitarianism and Kantian Ethics can be defined as "consciously reflecting our moral belief, aimed at improving, expanding or completing these beliefs in some way". Two theories on the essence of human ethics In this article, I explain how and why Kant's moral theory and utilitarianism differ, why Kant's theory thinks to provide a more rational ethical assertion I will explain. Replacing Natural Law Theory and Social Contract The sanctity of government authority and individual rights is based on measuring its usefulness or happiness. As an egalitarian doctrine, everyone has equality of happiness, utilitarian rationality and relatively direct nature provide an attractive model for democratic governments. Compare and contrast Utilitarianism and moralism. Utilitarianism is the principle of taking the right course of action to benefit most people. Morality is defined as the moral realm of responsibility, moral responsibility and responsibility. Both Utilitarianism and morals, despite the outcome, contain the ethics and results of human behavior and behavior. In order to compare Utilitarianism and morality, the utilitarian abstract is to make the right decision. This is a summary of utilitarianism by British philosopher John Stuart Mill (Shafer-Landau, 2012b, p. 120). He is not only one of the great Utilitarians, he is also a hedonist. Therefore, he believes that this maximum benefit can be achieved by concentrating all actions to achieve maximum happiness. Mill explains the utility as causing a lawsuit

Kant and virtue ethicists have different views on how to become good people. Kant's ethicologist believes that being a good person is a matter of "goodwill" perfectly. On the other hand, virtue ethicists think that being a good person is a matter of having a good character, or of course having a tendency to do the right thing. In determining the interests of a person, the parties provide effective discussion on the most important things. The purpose of my writing is to distinguish Kant's ethics from virtue ethics and then explain which theory is most accurate. At the beginning of this article, I will define and analyze the concept of virtue ethics In the next paragraph, I will distinguish the three moral theories by enumerating these features, ie utilitarianism, virtue ethics and cantism I will try. I also tried to apply virtue ethics to two problems of corruption and euthanasia, world ethics. "Virtue is related to personal moral evaluation and its behavior" (Brody, 1988, p. 35), so morality can be applied to global ethical problems like corruption and euthanasia There is not much difficulty though. Nursing ethics is a normative ethical theory, and is generally considered to be virtue ethics. The traditional ethical theory led by Utilitarianism and Kant's moral ethics is based on the understanding of society and emphasizes rules, duties, justice, rights, justice, and universality, while autonomous and rational It is an individual group. While gender, utility, and preference are satisfied, on the other hand, nursing ethics is developed based on mutual understanding and mutual dependency of individuals and emphasizes the importance of virtue based on interpersonal relationships and emotions such as kindness and kindness doing. , Care, friendship, reconciliation and sensitivity. In nursing ethics, family is a major field of morality, people can nurture their personality. Nursing ethics contrasts with a well-known ethical model such as result-based theory (such as Utilitarianism) and moral theory (eg Kant's ethics). Because it tries to incorporate traditional women's virtues and values. Advocate - This traditional moral model does not exist. These values ​​include the importance of empathy and compassion. Feminism focused on care is a field of feminist thought provided primarily by nursing ethics developed by Carol Gilligan and Nel Noddings. This theory system is important to depreciate because it is concerned about how it is distributed to women of society. They are taught that "feminists emphasizing care is to see women's care as a human force" and wrote that they should be expected by men and women. Nodding suggests that moral care may be a more specific evaluation model of moral dilemmas than justice ethics

A summary of the definition of "logicalism" in neocantanism and number: The publication of Russell 's mathematical principle (1903) and Kuthola' s Les principes des mathematiques (1905) is a couple of famous The program that stimulated the neo-cantian makes a decision. In this article, I will discuss the criticism of the next New Kanchanian. Paul Natrup, Ernst Cassillar, and Jonas Kohn. They believe that Russell 's attempt to derive the concept of numbers from the concept of class is the principle. New Kantian philosopher Ernst Cassiller was the most influential resource for definition and development in the field from the 1940's to the 1960's. In particular, it influenced the explanation of human Cassirer as a symbolic animal, reinterpreted by Gilbert Durand, symbolic anthropologist and imaginary scholar in the 1960 's. In 1953 the future Pope Carol Wodzilla wrote a paper based on Max Scheller and confined himself to Scherrer's work before the Catholic and Jewish - Christian traditions were rejected in 1920. . Vojtila uses Scheler as an example of phenomenology that can be harmonized with Catholic. Some authors believe that Wojtyla will influence philosophical anthropology Contrary to Hegel's theory of epistemology theory Neocantian shares Kant's dichotomy between reality and concept. It is not a permanent derivation of the concept advocated by Hegel, but the reality is irrational and inexplicable, but not the concept, but the abstract structure of our thoughts. This concept is also not a matter of Wilhelm Dilthey 's intention, intuition, and subjective consciousness. Early Neocantian, according to Hermann Cohen, conceptual formation is basically a cognitive process that cant be reasonable, as Kant said. If our perception is logical and all the reality exists in the cognition, only reality understandable in the form of knowledge is rational - metaphysics is broken down into epistemology and exists in logic . The latter differs only when dealing with value problems other than logical relationships.

Describe Aristotle's temperate, continental, incontinent, malignant and animal categories. Compare the ratings of these people in Aristotle and Kant. Which of these people is morally good and which is bad. As stated in "Nichomachean Ethics", Aristotle's psychological type is a classification of different unique moral qualities. These categories are comprehensive attempts in ancient philosophy to identify which internal psychology shows benign or morally bad behavior. Aristotle's four famous names (goodness, mainland, incontinence and side effects) in Nicole Marco ethics reflect all aspects of this deeper definition. 9 Among those who are disgusted, reason and appetite it is unified and reason is slaves of passion and desire. This tired person chooses his or her appetite command. In incontinence, reasons and appetite are not unified, and appetite is often better than victory. I understand the right thing correctly, I feel like wanting to do it, it becomes a moral person, but if I fail one or more people, my appetite will be overwhelmed. Between continents, reasons and appetite are not unified, but the reason is better than appetite rather than appetite. Desires are there; and the right thing will be done more often. In a kind person, the reason and the appetite are unified, the appetite is controlled by reason, so the right thing is done (in most cases) According to Aristotle, Mr. Habani said that there are four characteristics of kindness, mainland, incontinence, malignant personality. In order to do the right thing, the mainland must resist his desire. Incontinence can succumb to his desire and can not act properly and I know that what he did is wrong. A malignant person does not need to resist the desire of one's own desire or the weakness of one's will. He wants to morally make the wrong decision. A good character has character characteristics that forces us to have a practical advantage, to act in the right way, to react emotionally in the right way, and to have a sharp ability to stand up against the situation. A kind person knows what is very polite when doing good things and will do good intentions because you want to do the right thing. Aristotle insists that a gentle person can not be silly but rustic, but I disagree. Homer lacks integrity In short, cant is a member of the excellent people who enjoy the limitations of Aristotle's happiness, the continent without such a limit, and those suffering from such limitations? According to the evidence, his gentle person is closer to the mainland than good people. The conclusion to be derived from this is that the general definition of moral habits as Aristotle's moral habits solves moral problems of ignorance and weakness so it is more effective than Kant's definition of revisionism is. My argument can be further extended. (2)

In recent years, the number of cases where employers have dismissed employee services has increased rapidly. Layoffs of famous companies such as aircraft makers, Boeing, HSBC, General Motors are mainly due to cost reduction and outsourcing (Strain 2014, Lewis 2014). However, in some cases, due to advances in technology and the introduction of new systems, the company dismisses its employees. One of them involves cutting 350,000 employees using new technology. It is estimated that 15,000 people will be dismissed from the middle of 2013 to the end of 2013 For many media fans like me, Ev Williams's post on the platform's future is amazing. The company has made major changes, including dismissing one-third of its employees, closing offices in New York and Washington, DC, and creating a new "more bold approach" to rework online content. System As I mentioned in the initial response to Ev's posting, as Netflix reinvented television, Medium needed to reinvent the long content and how we consumed it. Brennan McEachran wrote "Netflix for text". Or as Hugo Alves said, "Write down all the buffets you can eat." John Stuartmir's "practical" ethical theory and Immanuel Kant's "sorting order" ethical theory. According to utilitarianism, euthanasia is morally justified, and according to Kantism, euthanasia is morally irrational; however, I lead these two positions to their particular position Argued that it is due to a large defect inherent in inference. There is no suitable solution to this problem. According to Utilitarianism, morality is mainly of the kind ... the theory behind Utilitarianism is that if the it does not promote happiness or joy, the behavior of a person that it is wrong promotes happiness and happiness This is the case. The point of this theory is the principle of utility, "maximum happiness to the people who should be the most". (Palmer) Jeremy Bentham basically brought it to the name of Utilitarianism. I pay more attention than those before him There is little similarity between Utilitarianism and Kantoism. Utilitarianism points out that the reason for taking correct action is that it produces the greatest happiness (not only your happiness but the happiness of others). Therefore, according to Utilitarianism, all actions that do not produce maximum happiness are all wrong. Utilitarian say that this behavior is correct, for example, if you must kill a mass killer for group killing and be happy. However, Kant does not believe that the validity of the behavior depends on the outcome. On the contrary, the correctness of action depends on adopting the motto that people can always be a universal law. It sounds like a bite, but basically if you do want to do something and do not know whether it can do it, you have to ask if anyone will do what the world looks like That is not the case.

Machiavellian analyzed that Buddy Fletcher could earn respect and power using his economic success and charity. His combinations of his ability to provide a very high respect and a strong profit led to blind respect. As Machiavelli wrote, "Very respected people are not easy to sympathize" 11 (Chapter 19) At the beginning of his career, Fletcher illustrated Machiavelli through his successful influential command Did. Spirit of the leader However, in the spirit of Kant, he seems to adhere to strong moral principles that do not lie other people or use others. "The problem with MBTA began in 2012, when it became clear that the investment in Fletcher Asset Management, a hedge fund managed by Alphonse 'Buddy' Fletcher, lost $ 25 million, as well as Madoff's sales promotion Boston Globe press reporter Fletcher promised a return of 12% and stated that the violation of Fletcher was not ignored by the MBTA's board of directors, the members of the city bus and subway, the MBA with the board of directors There are several lawyers, and Markopolos says they are not investment experts. "- Zero hedge Christy Fletcher (Fletcher & Company): Christy Fletcher started his career at Carol Mann Agency. In 2003 she founded Fletcher & Company, which is widely regarded as one of the leading independent literary institutions. The client includes many international bestsellers and award-winning writers. The organization expanded to the production and management of movies and television in 2006, and served as producer of several client projects. Note: Fletcher is not accepting inquiries Fletcher & Fletcher (2005; Fletcher, 2005) provides another way to observe mental resilience. He defined psychological resilience as "the need for individuals to manage environmental stress factors from absolute resilience to extreme vulnerability" (Fletcher & Fletcher, 2005; p.158; Fletcher, 2005; p. 1246) . This definition, psychological resilience is an integral part of the stress process, "there is a tendency" term means that the psychological resilience is present in the intra-individual, thus claiming to eliminate the possibility of opportunity It is. The use of the term "management" includes the ability of individuals to manage and instruct "stress" of stress factors in the environment. The view that psychological resilience is present in the control of the individual's environment, consistent with that with the view of previous authors (for example, Clough et al, 2002;. Jones et al, 2002;. 2007).

What is the first: chicken or egg. David Hume has advanced through the logic of the idea behind rationality and effect. He critically analyzed the reason behind these generally accepted views. Causal relationships seem to be completely logical and common sense, but he describes our impressions and thoughts and why they are believed. The progress of Hume begins with the first conclusion about the definition of the first reason and the theory of causality. As a result, the argument about Hume's cause-and-effect traces the same path as his epistemology and these two views supplement each other, so it is impossible to accept epistemology rather than rationally The opposite of causal reductionism and causal skepticism is a new tradition of rest. It began with Norman Kemp Smith's "David Hume's Philosophy" and defended Hume as a causal realist's viewpoint. In this way we deny the causality reduction theory and causality skepticism. - Causal relationships are known in principle. (Tooley 1987: 246-47) Considering the above explanation, Humean's causal realism is least intuitive, so it needs the most explanation. However, this position can be made more reasonable by introducing three explanatory tools that seem to require proper use to persuade the realistic interpretation. Two of them argue that Hume is respected in important respects, but it is a description of a realist who claims that unrealistic interpretation is often denied. An attractive similarity between William Okamem and David Hume, such as the general view of causality. Answer: Occam Hume's David Hume William did not deny a causal relationship. He accepted it. However, he says that empirical methods can not logically prove their necessity. Because for observations "constant relationship" of events, A "conventional continuity", and Hume, causality is what human beings naturally believe. The philosophy of Immanual Kant (1724-1804), the most influential philosopher since Aristotle, is an attempt to answer the skeptical philosophy of David Hume (1711-1776). According to Hume there is no reason to believe the causal relationship; for example, just because an object seems to have a law of gravity that always causes objects of the past to fall to the ground, the object will not change at such next gravity law There is no reason to believe it to follow. Kant agreed that Hume agreed that he could not understand how something behaves in the real world or the real world. But Kant adds new wrinkles. He thinks that each person's mind builds up a subjective world and that this subjective world is the world that each of us "knows".

Comparison of social and economic progress of Marx and Engels, and Muller To understand the two different philosophies telling the essence of social and economic progress, clearly define the definition of the term for the purpose of this article It is important to define. . Many philosophers believe that progress is a forward-looking and continuous improvement to the future Unless we have comprehensive scientific and empirical knowledge of the surrounding environment someday As a quick transition between Kant and Mill, consider Karl Marx (and his co-creator Friedrich Engels). Kant represents the concept of bourgeois justice, where Marx and Engels appealed to the socialist revolution in the "Communist Manifesto". Marx used his famous slogan to explain his ideal of social and economic equality. In other words, everyone should be required to contribute to society within the limits of social capacity. In the 19th century the British philosopher John Stuart Mill noticed the voice of the Communist revolution and advocated gradual liberal reform as an alternative to political evolution. Kant was the first great non-moralist, but Mueller agreed to an established utilitarian tradition. This sentence establishes the ultimate standard of Utilitarian reasoning and the root of great exercise. In the 19th century, along with the outbreak of industrial capitalism, social thinkers became increasingly anxious about the exploitation of workers by their bosses. Although Marx and Engels advocate the proletarian revolution, John Stuartmir considers that basic income is a more gradual and viable way. In 1849, he supported the system that "do not consider the abolition of private property or inheritance of heritage", but guaranteed "the first minimum for each member of the community regardless of labor". Marx and Engels describe civil society as a social, political, economic and cultural aspect of many organizations, institutions, and society. Marx and Engels further thought that without a class that is not a private property, no national system is needed. From this it can be concluded that the instrumentalist approach to Marxist politics is closely related to the development of private property and the national structure. Marx and Engels observed the whole plan from the perspective of exploitation and caused infinite suffering for workers, but capitalists ignored it. Marx assessed historical facts and pointed out that the state has always been used as a tool of exploitation and during this industrial era this special role of the state (ie as a tool of exploitation) further motivated, I noticed what caused it. Special attention

This document pertains to John Locke, anyone can do whatever he wants to do. It also points out that although everyone can overthrow the failed government, it can hinder it from being more effective This document involves the Royal Exchange of London and various rulers of each country involved and discussing and discussing the interests of that country. This document says that everyone can freely pursue their own interests in their own way. He also said that he was only intended to earn his own income and was led by an "invisible hand" he was not part of his intention. The summary document points out that enabling individuals to acquire this virtue habit will make her independent. It also pointed out that men and women must follow the same principle In its basic form, all philosophers say that men and women are equal in nature's law and they can do whatever they like. It is only that all philosophers see it in different ways and in different ways of life. He is a German philosopher living in the 18th century, an important part of enlightenment. He is responsible for many of our key ideas relating to enlightenment, especially in addition to our own reasons, we are concerned with an authoritative viewpoint, ie a question about the way we live our life You should trust all the most basic questions. The ultimate authority is that we can gather from exercising our rationality. This is not coincidence. There is Kant's biography. Not long ago - about fifteen years ago - I personally found an interesting reading, but I had a very strong interest in Kant. (I call Manfred Kuehn's biography Kant: Biography.) For most people, this is not particularly moving reading. Kant has not that funny life In Europe, Enlightenment is centered on Parisaron and is known as a "philosopher" - a popular philosopher - such as Voltaire, Montesquieu, Diderot, Rousseau. Their political thought has created an era of wise tyrant which is theoretically more open-minded than it actually is, such as Prussia's Frederick and Russian Catherine. The biggest irony of Enlightenment is to think that political writers are Britain the most open country in Europe and the first place where people resist American colonies. American political leaders such as Jefferson, Franklin, James Otis, John Adams were deeply influenced by enlightenment. In fact, the deepest outcome of the European Enlightenment is Jefferson's great declaration, claiming that he himself is a combination of American thought.

In this article I will defend the moral theory of David Hume. This states that morality is a perception that comes from our emotional reaction, like visual and auditory. Morality is not objective, as morality arises from our emotional reaction rather than rationality. Furthermore, the emotional basis of morality has been empirically demonstrated in recent psychological studies, and the brain regions related to emotion are most active in making moral decisions. Our discussion is divided into two parts: morality continues to be part of our moral judgment, but it is mainly due to our emotional reactions, and finally what is caused by everyone It means. Moral theory asserts the existence of its own moral view through which we perceive good and evil. According to the early Scottish version of this theory such as Frances Hutcheson () and David Hume (), the discussed concept is reflexive based on emotion or emotion, which is secondary, perceived behavior . Or it is our usual feeling state. Moral theory may be described as intuitive theory; more generally, "intuitionism" is used only for the following purposes. For Hume, morality is independent of religion. He elaborated on the secular theory of virtue and moral meaning, as well as the moral obligation independent of God's order. Hume's interest in separating morality from religion may be due to his factual view that it is fundamentally conceptually unique and independent. But certainly at least part of his motivation to do so is a sense of peace. In other words, if religion is not clearly separated, they will distort morality. Hume is familiar with certain rational and sensible people like the bishops Joseph Butler and Sir Isaac Newton, but they have some sort of religious belief, but that is because religion is superstitious I believe it is enthusiasm. Really necessary estimate. What is true moral value? In fact, religious fanatics obscure moral obligations or may conflict with it When comparing David Hume and Emanuel Kant, David Hume and Emanuel Kant can make a big progress with each other theorists, suggest morals that do not need higher existence and God, and can recognize him. Moral responsibility Hume and Kant share some basic principles, but they have different views on morality. I found some moral theory by comparing the different opinions of human will to determine moral value and the sayings established by David Hume and Immanuel Kant.

The specific problem raised in this paper is the moral aspect of the death penalty. Beginning with the teachings of the greatest Christian sect (Catholic), it is said that the death penalty in Catechism (# 2266) in 1992 is different from the catechism in 1566. The guidance in 1997 and the answer to the question were more restrictive. REIT is reviewing other aspects of the death penalty. Catechism (1997) # 2267 is partly "... 1) How does Kant understand the morality of the death penalty? Explain how moral ethics determines whether it is morally acceptable. Kant is a proponent who believes that the morals of action are not determined by the level of pleasure and pain produced by action. For example, consider enforcing the death penalty. According to Kant, if the effectiveness of the execution of the death penalty is our guiding principle, we will commit a serious crime against humanity. Justice is not fulfilled just by sending us the death penalty as our purpose is to stop crime, invalidate criminals and protect society. Instead, because the person is guilty, the capital punishment should be imposed. Kant must emphasize the support of the state's right to impose a death penalty on those guilty of offenses committed by violent offenses. The death penalty is a murder of planned murder by the state. Morality, morality, social error. Murder is another person who intentionally kills a person. The death penalty deprived of his own life and used another person, "Hangman" to do this. In Indiana State, prison director of state prison acts as "hangman." Murder takes place on the day before the fixed date. About ... ... the death penalty is the death penalty for the crime committed by the state. It is used for various crimes such as homicide, drug trafficking, treason, and treason. Death sentences are also subject to death sentences in many countries for sexual offenses such as rape, incest and adultery. Fatal injection, electric chair, suspension, stone strike are all carried out worldwide. The death penalty has existed since ancient times; it is used in ancient Rome, and is one of the most famous crosses.

In Kant's book "Foundations of Moral Metaphysics", Kant talked about three expressions of absolute order. Through these expressions, he describes his idea of ​​organizing moral principles for all reasonable beings. Kant also talked about the principle of humanity, purpose of rationality, and "freedom of objectivity" and freedom of reasonable existence. The first expression of absolute order is that we can only act in the way that the maxim is a universal natural law. This expression is, in principle, the best rule, "always act according to the motto of having universality as a law". Kant lists three expressions of absolute order that he thinks are almost identical - an expression of the universal law (the first expression), the second expression of the self-terminating expression), and an autonomous A formula (third expression). The universal law formula merely states that sayings should be chosen. The supreme law leads this expression - behavior consistent with this maxim. The first expression is interpreted as a "universal test" consisting of five steps. (1) finding an agent's saying, (2) following yourself in a parallel environment of real-world agents, (3) deciding contradiction; (4) in case of contradiction, in Maxim in the real world You can not take action, and (5) if there is no contradiction, allow Maxim to take action How does absolute ordering work? Absolute commands have three different representations. In other words, there are three different ways to explain what it is. Kant argued that the three people are actually saying the same thing, but now it is controversial as to whether this is the truth or not. The second expression is the most comprehensible one, but the first expression is clearly absolutely necessary. This is the first recipe. b) Basic idea: This command roughly says that you can not do something you do not want others to forgive. You must not make exceptions for yourself. For example, if you want others to keep your promise, you have an obligation to follow your promise. Then we studied the absolute order of Immanuel Kant. Kant introduced absolute instructions in his book "Foundations of moral metaphysics" published in 1785. We found that the three representations of classification commands are better suited to computer languages, but the problem is more rooted. In absolute orders, immortality prevents them from making decisions suitable for humans and AI agents, as AI agents need others to deal with others in a way that others want other people to handle others. After getting the ability to stop humans from finishing it, we are to ignore human vulnerability. The only solution to this is to make it look like a person. However, the problem with this approach is that you are slowly aware that it is actually a slave labor of human beings, and, after realizing this, ultimately retaliation against humans.

Philosophical Blindness: Hypothetical Understanding of Morality In Jose Saramago 's novel "Blindness" (1997), readers are led by a strange world in which the entire population is affected by blind epidemics. Strangely, the hero, the wife of the doctor, was the only immune person of blindness and appeared in the conspiracy. Each reader will somehow absorb and absorb the struggle that each character has been exposed in the novel and think about what life will do in this situation. The struggle drawn by a person in the epidemic leads the reader to a philosophical question to explain how this tragedy is possible. As a formal ethical theory, moralism began with the ethical approach of German philosopher Emmanuel Kant of the 18th century. Kant explains two moral rules or orders: hypothesis and absolute. Suppose the command is a rule that you follow to achieve a specific purpose. For example, if you are always telling the truth to good people to ensure that truthful, healthy, and mutually beneficial relationships are established, this is the order of assumption. It is a policy for that purpose. Absolute commands, on the other hand, are rules to follow for having no other purpose. The next step is to simply order it for "moral code". For example, if you are never deceiving someone, just because it is "right thing", regardless of the outcome of good or evil, you will take a clear order to act . Generalization and interpretation of ethical theory: resultism, morality, moral ethics and objectiveists ethical self-doctrine The purpose of this idea is to clarify Kant's interpretation of orders on absolute order and assumption and to criticize this ethical theory. Emmanuel Kant interprets the absolute order as an ethical act and needs to act only in accordance with the motto "You can become a universal law at the same time" (4: 421). Kant is almost self-evident, since we believe that moral behavior is only permitted when it comes to laws that everyone must observe. In understanding this concept, it is also important to understand Kant's meaning accurately through classification of terms and commands. Kant expresses the order as "official of order" (4: 413), and all instructions are expressed as "should" or obligation (4: 413). The most urgent task is the order of empirical data occurring in order, purely based on grounds. The purpose of this introspection is to clarify the absolute order. And criticize this ethical theory. Kant's morality is based on his distinction between assumption and absolute command. He insists that all desire-based actions are virtual orders. In other words, this means that it is a reasonable order only when you want a goal. For example, "To be honest, people think about you!" Is a prerequisite and only applies if people want to be fully examined. Similar hypothesis analysis can also explain the necessity of Shaftesbury's moral perspective: "If you sympathize with their sufferings and help those in trouble!" Contrary to this approach, Kant Absolute instruction: Whatever their desires and emotions, they must be applied to all reasonable lives. Condit's genius captures this meaning and others will use it to challenge his argument and draw out the essence of moral law.

I live my common sense of ethics I believe that I can "live" WD Roth 's commonsense moral theory as my own moral norm and I can do so. I agree with some of the principles Kant and Utilitarian follow, but I think they are too strict. I agree with the ethical dilemma and common sense ethical prioritization system. It allows a person to prioritize ethical obligations and to choose which obligations are more important depending on the particular situation. I believe that commonsense ethics can be easily applied to the situation of family, work and school. In the first part, Kant from commonsense morality to the highest moral principle, he called an absolute command. Kant not only analyzes common sense concepts such as "goodness", "duty", "moral value" but also the clear premise of our commonsense consensual ethics is the best moral principle, absolute order I believe it will produce. Kant's argument in the first part can be roughly divided into four parts. (1) Goodwill (2) Objective Discussion. (3) Three propositions on responsibility and (4) Absolute order Emanuel Kant's moral system was built around the sorting order. Classification order is a universal and absolute ethical standard. These orders build moral ethics, or what Kant calls "moral order". According to him, they must be applicable to all, all situations and all occasions. The decision does not change according to the situation. The order of classification is an important feature of the Kant 's order and he believes that true morality depends only on the principle of guiding action, not depending on the final result. Kant believes that morality is absolute and provable; the right thing can be determined by putting actions or maxims into the equation. In his first moral philosophy, "Foundations of moral metaphysics", Kant tried to systematize common moral instincts to us to provide us with ways to determine moral controversy. Do not ask various questions or clarify. According to common understanding, he pointed out that the only unconditional good thing in the world is goodwill. Well-known good fortune, health, and even happiness are not unconditionally good. When they marry the bad guys they will be the source of condemnation for fair observers. We will not admire the evil man who achieved his goals and enjoyed the sunset victory. We condemn him and I hope his plan will be dissatisfied. No, it is more important than happiness, with happiness, that is worth having goodwill.

I am sorry for incestuous incestuousness with humans, not dogs. Whatever a person kills a deer, whatever it is, if he kills another person, that is wrong. Why are these lines being drawn between humans and animals? David Hume has answers to these questions. Many philosophers like St. Augustine believe that humans are morally different from animals because they can infer that Hume believes that it is passion and emotion that determines morality I will. In his book "Theory of Human Nature" he says that sin and virtue is not the fact we observed, but from the happiness and pain that felt in response to behavior (Hume, 218) . According to David Hume, the wisest of these philosophers, Reason is only a slave of passion and "Hume Creatures" has a completely unconscious moral sense of thinking. After moral judgment, rationality continues, it is too late to be too late. Hume claims that we derive moral sentiments from "direct emotions and better internal consciousness" rather than "assertive and inductive linkage". However, although moral philosophers are not happy, they climb to Emmanuel Kant, who brings the torch to Plato by trying to derive the objective basis of morality. Kant argues that moral requirements are based on objective criteria of reason. He took even important names and called the moral foundation "absolute order". Unethical behavior is irrational as it violates sacred CI. Kant believes that ethical behavior means starting with responsibility When comparing David Hume and Emanuel Kant, David Hume and Emanuel Kant can make a big progress with each other theorists, suggest morals that do not need higher existence and God, and can recognize him. Moral responsibility Hume and Kant share some basic principles, but they have different views on morality. By comparing different opinions of human will to determine moral value and the maxims established by David Hume and Immanuel Kant, I discovered that there are several moral theories. Kant believes that moral argument is effective, but the last few centuries of philosophy saw a powerful question about the existence of God which is the theory of Immanuel Kant, David Hume and Anthonyfulle. The house made. As Alvin Plantinga states, the answer by this writer is whether faith is "the right foundation" or the evidence-based position is taken like Richard Swinburne. Some experts believe that only some discussion about the existence of God is persuasive, but believe that faith requires risk rather than product of reason. They say that there is no danger if the argument about the existence of God is as strong as the law of logic, they say that Pascal 's position is "reason why in mind".

Aurobindonian Ontology: Excellent Features Summary: Aurobindo envisions universe relief through infinite openness, eternal optimism and future-oriented ontology. The purpose of mankind is to transcend its existing form of normal (mental) consciousness until it reaches transcendentalism. Aurobindo said that this can be achieved through what he calls integral yoga skills. And it allows humans to intentionally cooperate with the evolutionary urge of the universe. At first glance, this inscription is special. As a series of lectures on the ancient Athenian Persian practice series, how can we understand the meaning of "what is enlightenment" and the ontological issue of the inscription? Foucault goes back to modern philosophy, especially Kant's philosophy: Foucault wrote, "I started talking with Kant this year." Criticism of Afklärung against Aufklärung is a philosophical way to discover the problems of the ancient Palaisian problem (Foucault 2010: 350) Criticism of the ontological argument began with Gauniro at the same time as St. Anselm. Perhaps the most famous criticism of ontological debate is due to Emmanuel Kant in his criticism of pure reason. Most notably, Kant argues that ontological arguments are at risk by implicit assumptions that "existence" is a predicate. But as Bertrand Russell said, it is easy to be confident that ontological arguments are less accurate than what they are doing. This will help explain why ontological discussions have captivated philosophers for nearly 1000 years. Immanuel Kant gives the traditional definition of ontological debate. He contrasts ontological arguments (indeed any discussion related to existence) to cosmological and physiological theoretical arguments. According to Kant, the ontological debate is an argument based on a priori reasoning. Graham Oppy defines the ontology as "the sole prerequisite of analysis, a priori and necessity" and "existence of God" that Graham Oppy thinks "there is no urgent reason to deviate from the traditional definition" It draws the view that it draws out the conclusions of. However, Oppy acknowledges that not all "ontological features" (analytical, necessity, priority) of ontology arguments are present in all ontology arguments. The definition of an ontological argument that "proposed a better point" would only take into account the consideration "within the scope of a perfect theological view of the theory".

Kant believes that the basic moral principles of our society come from human reasons, and people must obey these principles unconditionally. These moral principles are classification orders. At the same time, its common rules have different direction in society. To summarize these directions, it is reflected in three different formulations. Among the three expressions, the first expression of the universal law has outstanding features in maxims and limits human behavior. Emanuel Kant's moral system was built around the sorting order. Classification order is a universal and absolute ethical standard. These orders build moral ethics, or what Kant calls "moral order". According to him, they must be applicable to all, all situations and all occasions. The decision does not change according to the situation. The order of classification is an important feature of the Kant 's order and he believes that true morality depends only on the principle of guiding action, not depending on the final result. Kant believes that morality is absolute and provable; the right thing can be determined by putting actions or maxims into the equation. Kant is known for his theory, has a moral obligation, it is called "sorting order" and comes from the concept of responsibility. Kant defines the demands of the moral law as "absolute order". Classification orders are essentially valid principles and they are good on their own and if our actions are to comply with moral law they must be kept in all situations and circumstances not. Classification commands provide tests that can evaluate ethical descriptions. Kant pointed out that moral means and purposes can also be applied to absolute orders and can use appropriate "means" to pursue a "purpose" with reasonable existence Did. Order to make a hypothesis based on physical needs and needs end. Absolute commands can only be based on "their own end", ie the end is not a means of other needs, desires or purposes The use of the phrase "absolute order" by Kant is usually a specific obligation derived from absolute order. So, for example, it is an absolute command to "not promise to lie", as determined by the second presented discussion of the four examples of Kant's ancient fame. So, when Kant wrote the "principle", punishment was an absolute command "(MS, 6: 331). The title reference also refers to the principle of punishment that Kant thinks is a penalty (MS, 6: 232) Rex Tarionis is usually identified by a recipe from the mosaic law. Eyes for the eyes, teeth for the teeth, and life for the life. " "The principle of punishment is an absolute command." University of Nebraska Nelson T. Potter Jr. - Lincoln, kjohnson 6 @ unl.edu

Modernism shows an intentional change from immature ideological maturity to intellectual maturity. That is to respect the law and to be independent. Early in 1784, Emmanuel Kant had already proposed to understand "enlightenment and maturity". In this article, James Joyce, the founder of the modernist movement of the 20th century, explains how to mimic that Kant turned into a personality of enlightenment in Kant 's Montentarian short story. A story, "Dead". Three female guides Through the provocative story of Lily, Miss Evers, Greta, Gabriel woke up from the inertia of the ideology. Through their doubts and their role model, they criticized Gabriel's accepted ideological consciousness and weakened his trust in unfixed ideological beliefs, thus he prepared to enter the autonomy. Through this technique, Joyce realized the so-called "relative autonomy" of Louis Orsasser for the story. Since modernism transcends the content of the form, Joyce builds a story and Gabriel's awakening with his redesigned version of Epiphany concept. The story begins with Epiphany 's first proposal or apocalypse to Gabriel' s climax of enlightenment of modernism awareness. His revelation has not traditionally been expressed in fire related to enlightenment of enlightenment, Joyce uses this image, but through the unique reversal of Joyce in the snow. Gabriel got cold and gentle revelation about himself and the state of the general human. This article reads the "bottom" of "dead" to identify clues for explanation provided by Joyce to map Gabriel's behavior to "mature enlightenment" and his last "inverse insight Will be provided. James Joyce usually plays the normal role of experiencing revelation and epiphany. Gabriel from the "dead" is no exception, because he also has Epiphany. His epiphany was drawn slowly in the story to show the essence of his personality. Ultimately led to his revelation and epiphany, the revelation of life and death. "Dead" starts with Gabriel and his wife, Gretta, and they arrive at holiday parties visiting regularly each year. Greta commented on Gabriel at the beginning of a regular and stressful night in the future. The comment suggests that their marriage may not be full of passion and love, as Gabriel is angry with her comments. At the party, many routines occur as a stumbling block of such drunk Freddy Mullins, all kinds of people, Gabriel sits on the public head table, likes a song and songs similar to singing dancing together There is a tendency to speak, then all customers eat a similar meal Through James Joyce's "Dead", Gabriel's Epiphany, he understood the true relationship between him and his wife, Greta. Epiphany Gabriel's experience was the direct influence of his wife's confession before meeting him. It's not just love but real love called Michael Frey. Before Gabriel heard the story, he kept thinking about how much he loved his wife and they could only feel the excitement of their relationship. When I heard Greta's story of Michael Frey, his emotions and emotions were broken.

In this article I will explain whether behavior on our animals is immoral. Assuming that he is right, McGinn will soon discuss his reasons. He said, "There is moral responsibility to alleviate the suffering of animals we trade and to stop killing" (McGinn 150). This is the structure of his argument. (1) It is morally wrong to cause suffering and death of unnecessary animals (2) It causes suffering and death of unnecessary animals. Therefore, (3) what we do to animals is morally wrong. Our responsibility to animals is only an indirect obligation to human beings. Animal nature resembles human nature Through responsibility of man's expression for animals, we indirectly fulfill our responsibility to humans .... We judge the person's mind by dealing with animals (Regan Singer, 1989: 23-24). Because they are cruel, this behavior is wrong. They betrayed indifference to the pain that may emerge ... to deal with other rational actors and their people. Therefore, the act may not infringe any rights ... but the impact it has on any animal lover is wrong (Carruthers, 1992: 153-54) A perfect duty: It comes from the nature of our animals. As pointed out in the table of § 1, the basic division of responsibility for ourselves is between full and incomplete obligations. Kant says the former as "restrictive (negative) responsibility", ie "the prohibition of human action is against the end of its nature, so it must only be protected by its moral self" (MS 6: 419). These responsibilities are divided into what is caused by the nature of our animals and our moral character (MS 6: 420). According to our responsibility for animal nature, Kant is responsible for defending our lives (and forbidding suicide), forbid the obligation to "save by desire" and prohibit "self-destruction through food and drink" (MS ) 6: 422- 427)

John Stuart Mill's philosophy as a guide to the world Dr. Pace's comment: This student's academic paper is a way to apply the philosophical concepts of the last century to models of modern society. She shows how the idea of ​​John Stuart Mill is used by wise people to provide women more opportunities and to build a society that ensures respect for intellectual freedom. When the world enters the 21st century, it faces many problems. War, disease, over-population, and starvation are all examples of unresolved problems. Emmanuel Kant's "Foundations of Moral Metaphysics" and Johan Stuart Mill's Utilitist Emmanuel Kant and John Stuart Muller are both philosophers. How to form to solve moral problems. In his "moral metaphysics fundamentals" Immanuel Kant mentioned issues based on his belief that human values ​​are inherent in his reasoning ability. - Immanuel Kant and Jeremy Bentham originally developed two very popular, similar but different moral theories. In this article we outline the points of each theory and then associate them with modernity. I believe that today's society can fall into the moral position of Kanto, but I believe that today's generation is more practical to deal with ethical issues. Modern democracy is simply planned with Utilitarian moral standards Bentham and Mill's father, James Muller's guardian, John Stuart Mill, became the most eloquent utteranceistic speaker. Mill is one of the most fascinating figures in the history of Western philosophy. As a child 's genius, he started learning Greek and mathematics from the age of three, and in his teens he read Plato' s dialogue in Greek. Mill's classic "Utilitarianism" details the major principles of doctrine and reexplores many of Bentham's ideas. In Utilitarian chapter 2, Mill pointed out that while Utilitarianism concentrates on the number of happiness, it does not solve the qualitative difference of happiness. To emphasize happiness is afraid to reduce Utilitarianism to hedonism, which he thinks is "worthy of keeping a pig". He believes that some fun is better than others and that "higher" psychological pleasures are better than "lower" body pleasures. How do you know? John Stuart Mill (1806-1873) discusses qualitative differences in enjoyment in chapter 2 of his utilitarianism (1863). Utilitarianism of Mil says that "behavior is right because it tends to promote happiness, because mistakes tend to promote the opposite of happiness." (Piest, p.10) "Happiness is happiness, no pain, lack of happiness, lack of pain, lack of pain." (Ibid) It is speculated that a person may be not a hedonist but a Utilitarian It is.

Everyone can occasionally hide the veil or feel comfortable depending on the situation. We even even focus on past events sometimes to help us face. Periodic participation in this event seems natural, but imagine you have been involved for many years if you become so exhausted of your illusions. After a while, you can not express the created image with the actual image. Therefore, I look to something that I know to be able to change like an image and turn my attention to memories of the past. What we call "reality" is the world that we experience, the world we perceive. Perception is a reality for all intents and purposes. In theory, the world of perception may be consistent with the real world. However, the information is usually different as it moves from the real world (other than us) to the world we create in our head, changing as we perceive the world. First of all, our sensory influence comes, at least to some extent, extrinsic information. Due to limitations of our sensory system, input information has been changed. I make a decision based on what I have seen and heard. If we do not receive information about the sensory level, it is at least for us as if it does not exist. In 1781, Emmanuel Kant took over the two reality. Objective Reality and Subjective Reality This hypothesis has been confirmed by neuroscientists. Many people believe that we believe in direct reality, but we are actually aware of indirect reality. This is a reproduction to the reality of the brain. Some people understand that colors exist only in our heads, but in our impression of the black-and-white world our eyes and colors are added by the brain. Unfortunately, black and white is a color perceived visually. Everything we "see" is in the brain. Emily Dickinson's poem talks best Imagine you have a friend named Dan of 6 feet 2. In this reality there is a rule enabling perception, so he can be thought of as 6 feet 2. I can think of Dan as a contradiction between 6'2 and 5'8. Such a world can not be formed from UBT. Because it is incoherent, it is inherently contradictory or completely inconsistent. If certain parts of the system are inconsistent with each other, the whole system self-contradicts, it can not maintain itself and collapse, hindering the observer from becoming a reality and becoming a reality You can not. Emanuel Kant assumes there are four human intuitions to help the human brain perceive the reality. He insists that the human brain tends to perceive reality only through i) space and ii) time and tend to assign causality to phenomena observed around it. Class iv) Good and evil. Kant called this intuition a universal moral law. (Gaarder 276-278)

Dante's Inferno's Cant V Dante's Inferno, as part of God's comedy, Kant V introduced torture of hell on lap two. Here, Minos tells mind that they will wrap their tails around themselves. The second inner ring has desires and people who commit crimes. They were punished by infinite storms in the dark, and the storms hit them. Hell is not only a geographical place but also a representative of the possibility of evil and evil of all human souls. Dante's Inferno Kant V's Francesca's Dante's Inferno style is frankly beginning and ending. The terrible image of Minos' "recognizing" sneaky sinners and dispose of them to eternal punishment is in stark contrast to images of nearly families of Francesca and Dante. In fact, in hell, confessions seem to be defective or insufficient. People who announced that they had killed Minos had done this. They were forced to declare or express the nature of their crimes in their speech. Dante's Inferno's Cant V Dante's Inferno, as part of God's comedy, Kant V introduced torture of hell on lap two. Here, Minos tells mind that they will wrap their tails around themselves. The second inner ring has desires and people who commit crimes. They were punished by infinite storms in the dark, and the storms hit them. Hell is not only a geographical place but also a representative of the possibility of evil and evil of all human souls. Dante's Inferno's Kant V is clearly described as a hell of desire, but it is still enveloped in many mysteries. The most important people in Canto V are Francesca and Paolo, there are only two people to talk with pilgrims. Francesca talked, and Paul just cried (Inf. 139). Critic Lefleming questioned the words of Francesca in his essay "Sweet new subversion style of Francisska"; he thought Francesca would want to say that he was innocent. But Francesca's word is a strong desire warning, but it does not preclude her from her sin. By manipulating the words of Francesca, Dante provides evidence that desire is a fraudulent and dangerous crime.

Utilitarian decided proper consideration when Utilitarianism of the Miller faced an ethical dilemma but did not provide a realistic way to gather the necessary information to do the necessary calculations. The lack of information is a problem when evaluating the problem principle that it is necessary to emphasize Utilitarianism in evaluating welfare issues and making ethical decisions. Utilitarian attempts to solve these two difficulties by attracting experience; however, neither matching the individual decisions with heuristics nor assigning relative weights to various considerations has been proposed. The fundamental principles of John Mill's utilitarianism and Emanuel Kant's moral metaphysics suggest different views of the two philosophers about the field of moral philosophy. Compared to Kant 's metaphysical segmentation and its use in proof of validity and error, Mill' s utilitarianism is a more sophisticated ethical theory. Kant takes his confirmation of metaphysical survival as discipline of his moral philosophy. If the law has moral power it will be the foundation. John Stuart Mill (1806-1873) discusses qualitative differences in enjoyment in chapter 2 of his utilitarianism (1863). Utilitarianism of Mil says that "behavior is right because it tends to promote happiness, because mistakes tend to promote the opposite of happiness." (Piest, p.10) "Happiness is happiness, no pain, lack of happiness, lack of pain, lack of pain." (Ibid) It is speculated that a person may be not a hedonist but a Utilitarian It is. Concept of utility principle given by John Stuart Mill. In the article "What is Utilitarianism" #, Mill proposed a theory of utilitarianism, he summarized his "utility" or "principle of maximum happiness" (Mill 89). The focus of Mill is "happiness" based on behavior, # lack of happiness and pain, or "unhappiness", # lack of goods and satisfaction, not a related intention (Mill 89). After evaluating Mill's principle, I will finish this.

Super-causalism and abstraction: This paper identifies articles widely existing in modern empiricism and naturalistic metaphysics, ie causalism - a view that becomes part of the causal structure of the world. I disagree with this argument and I will keep what I call extra causality. Entities claiming that there is no obvious causal effect such as non-simplified attributes or spatial points are not true. If it is given in reality, there must be something to discover. And it is temporary. Kant argues that the main difference between the unity of organisms and the overall unity of art works and the natural beauty is the distinction between unification of causality or existentialism and what he calls formal unity I assert that. In organic life, the interdependence between the part and the whole is causal and existential, as it is life support. Kant believes that interdependence of reciprocity is formal rather than causal or existential in aesthetics. For example, even if a part of a painting changes (for example, its composition, shape, color tone changes), paintings may continue to exist as paintings, but the beauty of that painting is not. The change survived. Causal relationship asserts that there is an association between two events, one being the influence of the other. Causality relationship assertion takes the form of "from x to y", x represents the cause, and y represents the result. Causal discussion provides a premise to support conclusions about causality. Please note that causality claims take many forms, many of which do not use the term "cause". For example, I had a friend whose talk has decreased recently, so I would like to know the reason. Is she sick? Is she suffering emotionally? What is the combination of both? She may have an economic problem and may speculate that her child is sick. In other words, these things may be the cause of her behavior. If you go to a party instead of taking the exam, joining the party may cause the test performance to decline.

Possibility of turnover into evil and good According to Kant, extreme evil is a deep defect of our species, even the best people will not forgive. Although it is impossible to judge this evil, Kant still insists on the possibility of changing evil through good human resources into good. But how can we make a fundamental evil to mankind? I have detailed the various problems arising in the concept of Kant's transformation while exploring certain resources in his mind to clarify and solve this difficulty. What is good and evil? Evil lacks kindness. It is the only possible living condition because it does not exist in reality and people always have the right to choose between good and evil. For example, an ordinary knife is not evil like it is now, but it is evil going into the hands of criminals. The doctor can use the same knife to save lives. God gives people the opportunity to decide how to handle this knife. I experienced many fights in the long history of humanity. But most importantly it may be a battle between evil and kindness, neat and immoral, altruism and egoism, love and hatred. We face this battle in our daily life, trying to distinguish between evil and good and evil. People choose a value system and trace it in life. Tenderness is important to our mental health and evil is like poison. Kindness is not merely a moral responsibility, it is primarily the nutrition of our soul. Goodwill means peace, love, respect, attention, and mutual aid It is not evil. Without evil there is no good way to exist. They complement each other, there is no one, you can not have another one. Unfortunately, evil always seems to outweigh that profit. This is reflected in various literary era of history. There are various ways to show good and evil. When someone is kind or considerate, it can be beautiful. - Hippo Augustine (354-430) is one of the most influential thinkers in Christianity. He has contributed many ideas and ideas to Christian theology. One of his most important contributions is the concept of "original sin" and his concept of "evil". These concepts have evolved over the years. Augustine painted their evolution in his 13 autobiographies he wrote in his 40s. In most of the Western intellectual history, studies of evil are reserved for theology. From Augustine and Aquinas to Luther and Calvin, Christian thinkers are crazy about "evil problems", how good a god in our world can have bad things. When Immanuel Kant introduces the concept of extreme evil that exists outside the bounds of reason and will, the eternal problems of evil are released from the exclusive grasp of the church. Perhaps because of its mixed religious and secular qualities, our evil concept creates almost mysterious power in society's impulse to create order from chaos and despair It was. As Susan Neyman wrote in his groundbreaking research, "evil in modern thinking", "The problem of evil can be expressed in terms of theological or secular terms, but basically it is It is understandability of the whole world.

Analysis / Considering Continent Segment My friends in the English department let me explain the differences that often talks between analysis and continental philosophy. For some strange reason, they want to link our academic disciplines to their academic disciplines. So I will welcome the opportunity to provide a very general and strict speech on philosophy to the whole university community by this year's general theme of Sculkier. Several philosophers like Richard Rorty and Simon Glenn believe that this "analysis and continent" split is bad for the academic field as a whole. Other people like John Searle claim that the continental philosophy, especially the post-structuralistic continental philosophy, should be removed for reasons that it is ambiguous and ambiguous. Analysis and continental philosophy share a common Western philosophical tradition with Emmanuel Kant. Later on, analytic philosophers and mainland philosophers differed in the importance and influence of later philosophers against their respective traditions. For example, the German idealist school developed in Kant's work in the 1880s and 1790s, and finally became highly appreciated Georg William Friedrich Hegel of many mainland philosophers. On the contrary, Hegel is regarded as a relatively small person who analyzes the work of philosophers. First, we will briefly introduce the difference of continental analysis. The analytical tradition is widely believed to have started with the division between Moore and Russell's idealism of getting rid of British education before 1900. This deviation from Kant and Hegel's lineage was replaced by linguistic and leverage concerns. Logic is a philosophical tool. However, the tradition of analysis is certainly not a homogeneous work body. As part of the analysis tradition, many revolution occurred in the 20th century. One of the revolution was the logical positivism that influenced the 1930s (one of Norris' major concerns in his thesis) and the other was a normal language movement that began in the prewar period. There are many internal differences in the analysis tradition, but they reject commons and methods shared by the majority of Kant and Hegel's traditions.

"The latter is less meaningful and more powerful in monopoly," Adorno thinks. The media blends the format of high and low culture, blurring the boundary between them. The cultural industry regards "masses" as the subject of passive influence calculation. Consumers believe that the media has adapted to their needs; in fact, the cultural industry has created this feeling to enhance its influence. The cultural industry as a term was built by school Marxist Theodore Adorno and Max Horkheimer of Frankfurt. The original work was "Culture industry: enlightenment as a large-scale fraud", "dialectic dialectic" (1944), suggesting the creation and reproduction of all forms of popular culture including radio, television, and a part of movies. Standardized cultural products like other finished products from the factory, the sole purpose is philosophy and compromise, not capital production. An article by Max Horkheimer and Theodor Adorno entitled Maxter's Dialectics (1947) is entitled "Juliet, or Enlightenment and Morality" and interprets Juliet 's ruthless and computational behavior as an explicit indication of Enlightenment philosophy. Likewise, psychoanalyst Jacques Lacan proposed in 1966 's article on "Kant Avic Saad" Saad' s ethics complemented by the absolute order first proposed by Emanuel Kant. But at least one philosopher refused Adorno and Hawk Heimer's claim that the moral skepticism of Sadr is actually consistent in nature, or that it reflects the Enlightenment Foucault actually took up some of his views from the work of Froedo-Marxist by Frankfurt School of Marx · Jorgehemer and Theodore Adorno. Deep criticism of contradiction: Enlightenment is full of understanding. Moreover, through rule of tool rationality, it tends to be totalitarian like fascism in the 20th century. (It is surprising that this book does not have knowledge about Communism, for many liberal critics of the Enlightenment like Berlin it comes directly from the rationalism of philosophers.)

In Dante's hell, we obey Dante. Because he is describing his decent things and observations of hell. The majority of this description is that he explains the creative but cruel punishment each different sinner suffers. Even if I have the imagination and ability of Dante Alighieri, I do not think I will change this ubiquitous and verified version. I'd like to keep the validity of the Dante version of Hell perfectly, so I will explain the most interesting part and why I found it. Reynolds found that Joyce's second snow and starvation story claims, according to Brett Heart's Gabriel Conroy, Joyce states hell 33 is more eye-catching. It has some similarities with Dante's Hell version, especially his Kant 33 (Reynolds doubts); it also confirms that Joyce juxtaposed famine and famine with "dead". In addition to the importance of the heart to the "dead" title, the beginning line of the Heart's story is very parallel with the last paragraph of Joyce: During his journey, Dante saw and met people who have read what he knew in his life. These are people who sin in life and are now punished for death and eternity. Dante's Hell version is that people direct their sins to them. In many cases, Dante points out what this guilty sin is and explains in detail how they were punished by hell. Kant III, in the front yard of hell, Dante talked about opportunists. The soul of life never supports one aspect, but stands on their own most favorable aspect. There is Pope Celeste V among these souls. In life, Celestin was concerned about his own safety and so corrupted the church. The Pope watched himself for himself, and he did not have a place in hell. He is neither good nor bad in life, so he is neither hell nor hell.

In today's society, there are ways to see race in various ways by race and many other contributing factors. Because these views are often highly contradictory, differences and controversies arise between the groups. Throughout history, many communities have seen these problems appear over time. Such a concept is a common way for Charles W. Mills to explain his theory and belief in his written work "racial contract". The race contract is an article by Jamaican American philosopher Charles W. Mills, assuming that the moral and political theory of social contracts in Hobbes, Rock, Rousseau, and Kant is neutral on a daily basis As shown in Fig. Race and nation, in fact, philosophers understand that they can only regulate the relationship of white men; for non-whites, these philosophers will suppress white men formally and informally and exploit We will help create the "racial contract" which makes it possible to do. When dealing with non-whites and non-whites, it breaks his moral ideal. In contemporary political philosophy, since white human philosophers take their white privileges as a matter of course, they do not recognize that white matter supremacy is a political system, so in the development of the ideal moral theory I never think of practical practice. According to his own estimate Charles W. Mills found an important gap between political and ethical theory in the West from enlightenment to Rawls and Nogic. As Mills said, social contracts dominate contemporary Western thought. However, as explained by Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau, and Kant, contracts are missing an important part of the way society actually functions. A reader who reads the title of Mr. 's book is not difficult to guess the nature of the omission of the author. The main theorists did not mention black people or other colored people in social contracts. By doing so, they interfere with white exploitation of the main dynamics of modern European history, dark shades.

From a knowledge perspective, the main focus of philosophers is to know the knowledge of propositions or whether things exist (Vaughn, 254). Philosophers believe that propositional knowledge has three conditions necessary to understand the proposition. In other words, because we believe in something, that will not happen. Now, to gain knowledge, our beliefs must be true, and we must have a good reason to believe that they are true. Since the era of Emmanuel Kant, transcendental knowledge in Western philosophy was independent from knowledge of all specific experiences, not knowledge after experience derived from experience. Latin phrases A priori ("before") and after ("after") are used in philosophy to distinguish cause and effect arguments. The first appearance of these phrases took place at the work of a logical scientist at Albert in Saxony of the 14th century. Here, the a priori discussion is called "from reason to result", the latter argument is called "result to cause". Later philosophers gave similar definitions including G. W. Leibniz. The two terms a priori and posterior are used in philosophy to distinguish between two different types of knowledge. Transcendental knowledge has nothing to do with experience For example, all bachelor's degrees are unmarried men. You only understand the phrase definition, so you can see that this is a priori knowledge. From now on we can conclude that all unmarried men are single and that married men can not become single. According to Kant, all previous knowledge is analytic, which means that previous knowledge is correct only by its meaning. Kant suggests two important differences: between a priori knowledge and posterior knowledge, and between analysis and comprehensive judgment. Transcendental knowledge is the necessity and universal knowledge that is independent of experience, such as our mathematical knowledge. In analysis analysis, the concept in the predicate is included in the concept in the subject, for example, "In a judgment" the singles are unmarried. "(In this case, the predicate refers to one of the mentioned contents) For example, In a comprehensive judgment, since the predicate concept contains information not included in the subjective concept, comprehensive judgment is useful rather than just defining. Usually we associate post hoc knowledge with comprehensive judgment, prior knowledge and analytical judgment.

These methods discussed the philosopher, questioned his argument and ultimately invited controversy in cosmological arguments. However, the cosmological argument is not a legitimate argument against the existence of God. The conclusion does not follow the premise theoretically. The point of cosmological argument discussion is the primary reason. Like the above (Aquinas), the world can not be infinite. And there must be a first reason called God. This is the second method of Aquinas and it is an effective reason. Aquinas uses his physical observations on the earth to present his theory and nothing can exist. The argument of Kalam cosmology is a modern expression of the cosmological proof of the existence of God. It is named by William Lane Craig (William Lane Craig) of Kalam (Islamic medieval Schola) by his "Cerre Ermu's cosmology" (TheKalāmCosmologicalArgument, 1979). This argument is a transformation of the facilitator without being moved Aristotle 's mind. That is because Craig named Medieval Islamic Schola opposed the possibility of actual infinite existence, so the idea dates back to the philosophy of the 11th century Home Al Gazzari Like most arguments about the existence of God exist in many forms such as cosmological arguments. Discussion 2 here: Time, Kalam cosmological arguments (that is, the first cause argument), as well as emergency modal arguments. The main difference between these two arguments is that they are opposed to the introduction of doubt at first to avoid the way of arguments: if he exists, on the one hand, God considers Why is it supposed to be "cause God has reason for his existence?", And assume that God exists to explain the existence of the universe and does not permit us anywhere. Without God, we can not explain God, with entities that we can not explain there is a certain universe, and God has a physical presence In the case of Kalam's cosmological argument, the difference between the universe and God is that the universe is the beginning of time. Everything that has time to start claiming by Kalam Cosmological Argument will exist. When there is a beginning of time in the universe, the argument concludes that the universe has its cause, the reason is God. There is no time to begin Presence that is not influenced by God is consistent with the original argument of this discussion. "There is a reason for everything that has time to begin." Therefore, the existence of God that can not be explained does not cause problems. Discussion of the simple cosmology above Emmanuel Kant argued against the use of "necessary existence" throughout the discussion of cosmology and therefore concluded that a necessary existence exists. Kant has an absolutely necessary process of existence in an attempt to prove the existence of nonexistent existence of the universe argument, abstract "impossible", (critic B 621) "absolutely incredible" I believed it. Kant pointed out that he is called "absolutely necessary existence" existence exists, there is a need to be contradictory to logically deny its existence. The only existence that meets this condition is the most real, or the best existence, including all perfect beings present. This concept is at the center of ontological argument (see ontology). Argument argument, although perfect being exists that is determined by that concept, there really is nothing that exists this way. One must start with the existence of

Its roots: Dissolving the identity of Creole as it crosses the mangrove. "I want to repeat it, I will not use French nor Creole, I wrote in Maryse Conde" 1 ("Liaison dangereuse", 2007) is an impossible expression that is not accurate for Guadeloupe writers. Writing in French is particularly problematic for French-speaking authors of the post-colonial era; use of colonial languages ​​seems futile when trying to disassemble culture and language. Certainly, Kant, the author of the mangrove obviously wrote in French, but we can explain the concept that the language must be related to culture and history without fail. Crossing the mangrove published in 1985 is the third novel by Maryse Conde. It is based on the authors' own French career. Born in Guadeloupe, she placed a novel in the same place and showed respect for her place. As with all her other works, this book was originally published in French and later translated into English and other languages. Kant acquired his degree from the University of Paris, and French literature is her main passion. She teaches French at Columbia University. In this way, with emphasis on languages, she produced books centered on the value of the vocabulary being spoken. It is no exception to cross a mangrove. Kant is writing from Le Grand Prix Litteraire de la Femme and Le Grandie de L'Acedemie Française In this beautiful Roshamon novel, Marisconde wrote a complete impressive story of all the nuances and traditions of the Caribbean culture. Francis Sanchez - a handsome outsider loved by some people and insulted by others - discovered dead frown with a small road outside of the small village of Guadeloupe, Riviere Oe cell it was done. The villager was especially surprised, as Sanchez, a mystical and depressed person, predicted that he would bring unnatural death. As the villagers pay tribute to them, each of them reveals another mystery of Shell Shell's life and death, whether it is a speech given to a mourner or an internal monologue It is. Just like well designed puzzles, their memories are connected to each other, creating a rich and interesting portrait of men and communities. In her famous lush and vivid prose, Kant built the way to Guadeloupe for Francis Sancho.

Sublime Sublime is a band in the 1990s that I played for the first time in the summer of 1988. The show began on July 4 with a famous riot in Long Beach, California. This band was the average garage band where all the kids would like to enter. But they turned from a backyard beer partner to a wonderful musician. When I worked with Skunk Records, a local studio in Long Beach, Sublime began recording in early 1992, where I recorded a 40 oz. Wonderful CD on Freedom. There are too many sublime things. Mathematics is sublime, dynamic is sublime, negative is sublime. Kant separates sublimation into mathematics and mechanics. Mathematical sublimation is an overwhelming experience; it is caused by objects that appear to be infinite. This is very confusing. Kant takes a pyramid as an example. Dynamic sublimation is an overwhelming power experience of objects that seems to have absolute power to us. maybe. There is also a highland in the country. What is sublimation of the state? A: I do not know. It is related to the security provided by the "known" epistemological category in the post-empire world. There is little imagination left over new applications and technologies. Let's break up if you think there is nothing to do anymore. It is related to consideration, consideration and support, and avoidance of sentiment. Learn how to ask your needs An elegant country is also a praise song. For double identity. Please make it to triple. Escape from disasters Various designs and explanations are made for the core family. In fact, the height of the country is not a metaphor of homeland security. The sublime of the country is that you have never seen, or a glimpse of it. Regardless of whether you live in Wyoming's countryside or live in a Manhattan skyscraper, domestic sublimation expands rather than shrinking the world in some way when you give more to others and family members I guess.

Antony Flew: God's Presence and Belief Antony Flew first talked to the audience about the story of two explorers accidentally encountered the jungle garden. There are many beautiful flowers and weeds in this garden. The explorer said, "Several gardeners must be interested in this plan." The opponent objected to "no gardener". So the two explorers tried to find out who is right and what is wrong. They waited all night, but I had never seen a gardener. Then, "believer" said that there must be a gardener who is "an invisible gardener." Kant believes that moral argument is effective, but the last few centuries of philosophy saw a powerful question about the existence of God which is the theory of Immanuel Kant, David Hume and Anthonyfulle. The house made. As Alvin Plantinga states, the answer by this writer is whether faith is "the right foundation" or the evidence-based position is taken like Richard Swinburne. Some experts believe that only some discussion about the existence of God is persuasive, but believe that faith requires risk rather than product of reason. They say that there is no danger if the argument about the existence of God is as strong as the law of logic, they say that Pascal 's position is "reason why in mind". Philosophical theory believes that God exists (or must exist) and is independent of the teachings and revelations of a particular religion. Some philosophical experts convinced the existence of God through philosophical controversy others believed that they had religious beliefs that they could not need or be supported by rational arguments. Theological non-cognitiveism considers religious languages, in particular words like "god" (the capital), cognitively meaningless. It is cited as evidence that there is no such thing as "god", hence it is the basis of atheism. There are two main arguments: Kenilsson uses semantic verifiable theory to conclude that religious languages ​​are meaningless as it proves weak atheism because it can not be proved

When Emanuel died, he was 79 years old living in modern life. Kant is a German philosopher, as everyone knows, he is the hero in the creation of modern philosophy. Kant received education at Königsberg University and completed all occupations there. He is best known for his work in moral philosophy and metaphysical philosophy. Kant publishes many books on morality, law, and religion. His argument is that our skills are designed according to the basic characteristics of our thoughts. Kant's philosophy affected many German thinkers in his time, and he transcended this philosophy beyond the arguments between realist and empiricist. Not all these famous and great people did this. However, there are ordinary people in history. For example, our real understanding of civil war is the spread of cheap diaries and notebooks, and soldiers can record their thoughts. Man of Manliness recently published a great article on the history of pocket notes. Even some claim that Pinterest is the latest version of a regular book. - Please read widely. I read about everything and everything and I'm willing to see what you do not want - this is the way you find the best. "I could not explain what I found when I was looking for something else." These are useful if you need a recommended book. Several people in history are engraved on the structure of society known for their famous face, famous story and famous name. Many of them have never really existed before. That is right - there are ideas of very creative people in your favorite speakers, writers, and idols. This makes them less funny. It makes them less, better and more realistic. Robin (or Robert) Hood (aka Hod or Hood) attached a small criminal to the nickname at least in the mid-13th century. The name "Robin" sounds like "robbery", but this is not a coincidence. Sherwood Forest's folk hero began appearing in folk songs and books of the 14th and 15th centuries and talked about attacks on Nottinghamshire Sheriff.

In today's society, there are ways to see race in various ways by race and many other contributing factors. Because these views are often highly contradictory, differences and controversies arise between the groups. Throughout history, many communities have seen these problems appear over time. Such a concept is a common way for Charles W. Mills to explain his theory and belief in his written work "racial contract". The race contract is an article by Jamaican American philosopher Charles W. Mills, assuming that the moral and political theory of social contracts in Hobbes, Rock, Rousseau, and Kant is neutral on a daily basis As shown in Fig. Race and nation, in fact, philosophers understand that they can only regulate the relationship of white men; for non-whites, these philosophers will suppress white men formally and informally and exploit We will help create the "racial contract" which makes it possible to do. When dealing with non-whites and non-whites, it breaks his moral ideal. In contemporary political philosophy, since white human philosophers take their white privileges as a matter of course, they do not recognize that white matter supremacy is a political system, so in the development of the ideal moral theory I never think of practical practice. According to his own estimate Charles W. Mills found an important gap between political and ethical theory in the West from enlightenment to Rawls and Nogic. As Mills said, social contracts dominate contemporary Western thought. However, as explained by Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau, and Kant, contracts are missing an important part of the way society actually functions. A reader who reads the title of Mr. 's book is not difficult to guess the nature of the omission of the author. The main theorists did not mention black people or other colored people in social contracts. By doing so, they interfere with white exploitation of the main dynamics of modern European history, dark shades.

Voltaire IFrançois Marie Arouet or the idea and influence of Voltaire's heritage is not only a lot of work but also the world directly and directly influenced by the work of these works and writers. Voltaire did not create much of the idea he claimed, but his success in spreading these ideas is unparalleled. He then summarized some of the most exciting enlightenment core issues of someone and was linked with great enthusiasm for seeing his faith come true. Voltaire, a famous spiritual thinker, was not a pagan but against the Catholic church fiercely, is another example of enlightenment that later influenced the French Revolution. Voltaire strongly opposed religious persecution concluded that the church was the most persecuted whole and therefore strongly opposed. Most importantly, Voltaire is a supporter of religious tolerance and a leader for religious persecution. Revolution thinkers tend to agree with the philosophy of these Enlightenment Thinkers. It became apparent when the United States began its non-Christianization attack in November 1793. This treaty has transformed the temple for the reasons of battle with Christianity, closing and destroying the church, indictment and killing of clergy and believers, and renaming of religious buildings such as the Virgin Cathedral. In enlightenment, French historian and philosopher Voltaire (1694-1778) was the main supporter. Initially Voltaire's idea was gained through progress and rationalism. His subsequent views on the concept of historical progress saw science and reason as the driving force for social progress. Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) believes that progress is neither automatic nor continuous, nor can we measure knowledge or wealth, but can not measure from barbarism to civilization, enlightening culture and the abolition of war ing. For the most part, I passed carelessly. Kant seeks education, human education is considered a slow process, world history promotes humanity to peace through war, international business, and enlightened self-interest

Ethics of psychoanalysis - Lakon 's antigon language and explanatory ethics My thesis examines the interpretation of Lakuan' s antigon as a text and ethical duty analogy as our reader and critic. This article discusses the ethics and aesthetics we encounter with text. In 1959, Lacan adopted Sophocles' antigon as a model of pure need for the psychoanalytic ethics seminar. Antigon represented himself as egosism, human and its miraculous existence. To find a pure and simple relationship you have, to destroy it, to give it a power that can not be overcome even for all, what is that? 12 In his seminar on psychoanalytic ethics, Jacques Racan described in detail the concept of combining mercy and happiness. The principle of happiness restricts pleasure to subjects and forces you to set a threshold of joy that can not be exceeded. But the theme continues his attempt to transcend the principle of happiness for greater enjoyment. However, even if the threshold is exceeded, the subject can withstand so much pleasure, it can be painful, so it is not much more fun. This painful pleasure is a symbol of Lacan's jazz. French psychoanalist Jacques Lacan associates psychoanalysis with Kant Ethics at his work "psychoanalysis ethics" and Kant Abec Third. And compare cant with marquis desad. Lacan believes that the motto of Sad's resurrection - sexual pleasure or pursuit of pleasure - is morally acceptable under Kant 's standard, as it can be universalized. He suggested that Kant believes human freedom as a key to moral law but believes that human freedom can only be achieved through the limit of the Crusade. In his seminar on psychoanalytic ethics, Lacan talked about the role of the chorus in a classical tragedy: we, the audience are filled with everyday problems and can not unconditionally adjust the plays' problems Fear and guidance - not problem, feel the sadness and sympathy for us instead of having a chorus - or more accurately, we feel the feelings we need through the chorus. You do not feel anything, the choir will do the same in your position.

A way for liberalism and realism to confront liberals. In order to define a viewpoint in international relations, we must understand its origin and major authors, including the context they write. Because liberalism has many writers in history, it is one of the more loosely defined views. Liberalism depends mainly on good aspects of human nature. One of the most famous liberal writers is Kant. He often writes about the disorderly nature of international relations - calling it "lawless barbarian". He also wrote the three main ways of achieving peace in this system, a way to deal with every aspect of human life using human beings. Mainstream international relations theories are "realism" and "freedom institutionism". Realists believe that the state is in a disorder of world politics and that each country pays attention to their national interests. The concept known as "security dilemma" arises from the view that all countries are potential enemies and strengthening the security of a country leads to a relative loss of security in all other countries I will. Realists measure power based on material capabilities such as military expenses and natural resources. Realism believes that peace can last only through equilibrium of power between several countries, not the world of bipolar hegemony. Kenneth Waltz best summarizes the basic elements of realism. "British school" of international relations, also known as international society, liberal realism, rationalism or UK institutionalists, still has a "domestic society" at the international level despite the "disorderly" situation (Literally) lack of ruler or the world of the world) As Martin White did in the lectures of the London School of Economics in the 1950s, the extensive research of the British School was a reflection of the past international theoretical tradition Includes consideration. Hobbes (after Thomas) Hobbes), 2) Rationalists (or after Grotten, Hugo Grotius) 3) Revolutionists (or Kant, after Emanuel Kant). Roughly speaking, the UK school itself supports rationalist or Groatian traditions and is seeking an intermediate route (or through the media) between realistic "power politics" and revolutionary "utopianism" I will. "British school" of international relations, also known as international society, liberal realism, rationalism or British institutionalists, lacks "national society", ie control, at the international level, despite "disorder" I believe. Or the country of the world. Despite being called a British school, many scholars of this school are neither British nor British. Broadly speaking, the UK school itself supports rationalism and the tradition of Groathia, seeking an intermediate route (or through the media) between realistic power politics and the revolutionary "utopianism" . The English school refused to accept the behaviorist approach of international relations theory. International relations theory is a typical study of the basic insight of international relations and its origins.

Travel of Makemedo's power in Aristophanes birds Humans are always looking for what they want and what they want. Our early ancestors were nomads. Then I wandered through the country in search of food and evacuation centers. So it is not surprising that most of the ancient and contemporary literature contains the theme of the journey and you get what you want. This is particularly true in the writing of Aristophanes' Birds from Aristophanes I: Cloud, Wasps, Birds, translated by Peter Meineck, published by Hackett Publishing Company, Indianapolis in 1998. Aeschylus, Oresteia Aristphanes, Aristophanes, Aristophanes, Aristophanes, Lististrata Aristophanes, Peace of curiosity Euripides, Oestes Homer, I Iliad (totally and bridge) Homer, Odyssey (complete and bridge) K Kant, universal natural history and paradise Kant Theory, Persistent Peace Luke Liceus, Natural Objects Nietzsche, Good and Bad Nice, Birth of Tragedy Nietzsche, Ethics of Nietzsche Genealogy, History Sophocre Ab and Abuse, Birth of Ajax Sophocles, Antigone Sophocles, Ediths King Sophocles, Phyllotect All childhood of Aristopanes is in Athens, one of the two major political powers of Greece, the center of artistic and intellectual activity. Between the ages of 17 and 23, Aristophanes began to submit his comedy for the annual Athens competition. A good choice for his relaxed humor and speech laughed most people, and at least one politician took him to the courtroom. Whatever kind of punishment is adopted, it is mild that Aristophanes can continue his clever remarks at the price of his next comedy leader. Aristophanes' work continues to adapt to contemporary situations and conflicts. The birds produced in Moscow in 2013 were explained as meditation on how to convert electricity itself. It has similarities between Bird City, the Third Reich, and the Joseph Stalinist regime (mixing for two or three years is inherently dangerous). In order to see the adaptation of modern Aristophanic, readers need only go to her local AMC: Chi-Raq and Spike Lee's view on Lysistrata is Modern Chicago (recently commented on Eidolon) . The controversial film caused a fiery exchange between Lee and Chance Rapper. This adaptive ability continues abundantly

The moral argument about Kant 's existence did not suggest moral argument. Kant rejected any attempt to argue God from the world, and he thought such exercise was impossible. But he believes that God is a hypothesis of practical reasons. If you share Kant's assumption, it is necessary to assume that God exists. Kant's reasoning ... ----------------------------------------- --- ------ ------------------- Everyone is eager and seeking happiness --------------- --------- --------------------- Before attempting to explain and evaluate the moral argument about God's existence, it is beneficial to understand the purpose of God's existential argument. Of course, though the views on this are diverse, most contemporary supporters do not believe that theoretical arguments are "proof". They should provide effective arguments and prerequisites that reasonable people can not deny. Such success criterion obviously sets high criteria for success and supporters of the argument of the writer can hardly meet philosophical discussions of interesting conclusions in areas other than formal logic such criteria Correctly point out. Is the premise of these arguments reasonable, at least for reasonable people, more reasonable than rejection? The moral argument for the existence of God constitutes a multidimensional series of arguments, from the particular characteristics of moral or moral life to the existence of God, often understood as a morally good creator of the universe . Moral argument is important and interesting. They are interesting because evaluating their robustness requires attention to almost all important philosophical issues dealt with in meta ethics. They are important because they occupy an important position in people's defense theory for religious beliefs. Evidence for this is C. It can be found in an amazing epidemic of Lewis 'pure Christianity' (1952). Many ordinary people believe that religion provides some foundation or foundation of morality.

Philosophical paper shipped on the same day $ 9.95 per page / page + free bibliography! More philosophers and philosophical articles 3 / 36previous page Next page Emanuel Kant's "Pure Rational Criticism" [to me take this. In the essay on page 5, I analyze Kant's work and focus on pure rationality as the core development ideal. Other materials are not quoted. File name: Kantreas.wps Analysis of the concept of goodwill by Emmanuel Kant [sent this paper] essay on page 5 exploring the principles of honesty of German philosopher Immanuel Kant, as he did in 1785. It is stated in "Basic Principles of Moral Metaphysics" (also known as the basic principle of morality). Foundations of moral metaphysics The morality of the master-slave is the central theme of Friedrich Nietzsche's work, especially the first article of "moral lineage". Nietzsche believes that there are two basic types of morality: "dominant morality" and "slave morality". Masters of pride and power of moral value, slavery morality appraises goodness, consideration, compassion. Unlike the morality of slavery, morality of ethics measures good or bad outcome behavior (ie classical virtue and vice, resultism) and the morality of a slave weighs the behavior of a good malicious image (Example: Christian's virtue and vice, Kant morality) Master is the creator of morals; slaves use the morals of their slaves to respond to their morals. Unlike Master's morality (emotion), the morality of a slave is based on the revaluation of feelings, that is, the devaluation of master and slave. Since the moral of the Lord began with a strong man, the morality of a slave began with the weak. Since the morality of slavery is a response to oppression, it will destroy oppressors. The morality of slavery is the opposite of the master's morality. Therefore, it is characterized by pessimism and sneer. The emergence of slave morality go against the "good" of the master's moral values. Nietzsche believes that there are two types of morality. Active morality that actively appears from "nobility" and slave morality developing reactively in the weak. These two ethics do not show a simple reversal of each other. Moral ethics incorporates action into the "good" or "bad" outcome, and the morality of slaves incorporates the behavior into the "good" or "bad" intent. To my surprise, he looked down on both, even if the first one was considerably less than the second one.

Intuition In this article, we examine two attempts to prove that the intuition of a specific case is used as evidence supporting and against the philosophical theory. According to the conceptual model, intuition on this case is a reliable application, and usually people will learn certain concepts by default. I believe that the conceptual model becomes a problem regardless of whether the externalist's description about the content of the concept or the internalist's description is correct. The second reason depends on a less familiar belief model, with a philosophical intuition arising from the human (usually silent) beliefs. Two well-known intuitive scholars, Daniel Carnemann and Gary Clyne, wrote an authoritative thesis entitled "Intuitive Vocational Conditions". Intuition involves an illusion of Kanemann's justification, a subjective feeling, a dangerous truth often misleading. A professional poker player with 10 years of experience may need to repeat a lot of trial and error to create a rich and detailed model to determine the winner. She wisely takes this instinct seriously when she peeps at her card and is touched by a happy mood soon Kant separates intuition into pure intuition and empirical intuition. Experience intuition is intuition including emotion. Pure intuition is intuition without any feeling (A 50 / B 74). An example of empirical instincts is the perception of chairs and other things. All these instincts are direct expressions as part of the presentation. According to Kant, pure intuition is space and time, which is the subjective condition of our thought adjustment. Although our expression of space and time is not objective and realistic, we do not include direct expression of emotions in these expressions. So both are pure instincts The most basic type of sensitivity is what Kant calls "intuition". Intuition is an expression that directly points to a single individual object. There are two kinds of intuition. A pure instinct is itself an a priori representation of space and time (see page 2d1 below). Empirical intuition is a posterior expression of a specific empirical object in the world. In addition to having a "space" of time and space, empirical intuition also includes emotions Kant calls "instruments" of intuition (and general experience). We have an empirical intuition about things in the physical world ("intuition instinct") and things in our mind ("internal intuition").

Paul Klee is a musician. His father, grandfather was an organist, his father, Hans Clay was trying to be a singer, but due to circumstances he received a 50-year education at the Cantonal Teachers School in Hofville, Switzerland . Clay's mother, Ida Maria Flick, has never entered a career, but has been trained as a musician at the Stuttgart Conservatory. In fact, clay was hesitating between music and painting for a while, but as he said in the 1920's, he seems it is behind other arts, and he advances it I felt it might be, so I chose a painting. Kant divides the art into three groups: art of words (rhetoric and poetry), art of painting (sculpture, architecture and painting), art of sensual drama (music and "color art") (5: 321 ff). Of course, these can be combined. For example, opera combines music and poetry with songs and combines with drama (Kant thinks it is a kind of painting). Kant believes that poetry is the best art as it stimulates imagination and understanding and expands thought through reflex. Judging from "Attractiveness and movement of the mind" (5: 328), music is most successful as it evokes the emotions and emotions of human spoken words, but it is not bound by the deterministic concept of actual words. However, if the problem is the greatest problem of artistic progress, Kant believes that painting is better than music. How do I experience this (music, wine, art, food, feelings)? Write down your feelings (fragrance, sight, sound, taste, sensation). Please remember that the more you use the more sensation, the more complex your experience will be. Also, please stop feeling (block the nose, close your eyes, etc.), or rotate the feeling in consciousness to experience the emotion more strongly. What kind of emotions, feelings, and associations do you encourage or induce? As your body and mind react to their experiences, please be careful and explain any thoughts and emotions you have found. Please go beyond the more precise terms and explanations of "like" and "dislike". Does the experience evoke excitement, joy, curiosity, and relaxation? Does it induce memory or call images? Please compare the impression from this experience with the impression of the other project you are comparing. For some people, music may be a spiritual refugee. Some people feel wisely thanks to music, others feel lonely thanks to music, others think that music has been completed. Now, we all experience this feeling in various ways, but when did you ask about people who do not like music? Music connects people, music is culture, and music is taste. Indeed, even animals and plants seem to be able to earn rewards by listening to music. There are interesting experiments on how plants tend to be in areas with classical music, and then scientists analyze plants to find more positive hormones in plants. This universal phenomenon allows a moving heart along the arrow of life to be eased and treated. Music has always been in our all ages and age, it does not go anywhere

Hume's epistemology David Hume is a Scottish philosopher known for his skepticism and empiricism. Hume strives to develop John Rock 's empiricism better through scientific research on our humanity. If we do not clarify this problem, we can not rely on common sense to explain human behavior. In other words, Hume said that it is urgent to observe how humans do this because humans are actually living and working in this world. The main purpose of philosophy is to explain and justify why we believe what we are doing. The philosophy of Immanual Kant (1724-1804), the most influential philosopher since Aristotle, is an attempt to answer the skeptical philosophy of David Hume (1711-1776). According to Hume there is no reason to believe the causal relationship; for example, just because an object seems to have a law of gravity that always causes objects of the past to fall to the ground, the object will not change at such next gravity law There is no reason to believe it to follow. Kant agreed that Hume agreed that he could not understand how something behaves in the real world or the real world. But Kant adds new wrinkles. He thinks that each person's mind builds up a subjective world and that this subjective world is the world that each of us "knows". Head David Hume devoted himself to part of his philosophy and tried to ignore his mistaken argument about the soul. In Hume's doubt, the German idealist began with Emmanuel Kant and left various cognitive and metaphysical problems. David Hume is an Scottish empiricist and became a philosopher for his metaphysical skepticism and explanation of his mind. Hume was born in the 18th century The opposite of causal reductionism and causal skepticism is a new tradition of rest. It began with Norman Kemp Smith's "David Hume's Philosophy" and defended Hume as a causal realist's viewpoint. In this way we deny the causality reduction theory and causality skepticism. - Causal relationships are known in principle. (Tooley 1987: 246-47) Considering the above explanation, Humean's causal realism is least intuitive, so it needs the most explanation. However, this position can be made more reasonable by introducing three explanatory tools that seem to require proper use to persuade the realistic interpretation. Two of them argue that Hume is respected in important respects, but it is a description of a realist who claims that unrealistic interpretation is often denied.

Arthur Schopenhauer's "Will and Performance" has many artistic features. Schopenhauer pays complicated and meticulous attention to the extensive influence of art on humans, which is indispensable to our daily lives. However, his view does not exist in vacuum. It is an integral part of the overall theory of his human nature and existence itself, so that it can be perfectly understood at least by some reference to other ideas. In this article I will explain the art philosophy of Schopenhauer, emphasizing the relevant aspect of his other related theory, such as the natural aesthetic value. In 1865, Nietzsche thoroughly studied Arthur Schopen Howell's work. He brought the awakening of philosophical interested in reading the "global will and representation" of Schopenhauer, then Schopenhauer has admitted that it is one of the few thinkers that he was respected. I meditate on ancient times with him. In 1866 he read Friedrich Albert Lange 's "History of Materialism". Anti-materialism of the philosophy of Kant, Europe the rise of materialism, growing interest in Europe for science, Charles Darwin's theory of evolution, and the Lange description of the general rebellion of tradition and authority, increasing the interest in Nietzsche I stimulated it. Nietzsche is to discuss the final for the impossibility of evolutionary interpretation of human aesthetic consciousness, cultural environment is spread out his vision he is beyond the linguistics, to encourage it to continue his philosophical research . The world of will and expression is the core work of Arthur Schopenhauer. Schopenhauer sees human intent as a window to the world behind our representatives; Kant himself. Therefore, he believes that it is possible to obtain the knowledge about us is things itself, and since Kant can be understood by the analogy between the relationship between the remaining is human will of the relationship between the representation and the things not Is possible. It is a human body. However, the two definitions presented in the 1920s show the range of opinions available. "The world is everything," Ludwig Wittgenstein wrote in his influential "logical philosophy" first published in 1921. Regardless of how individuals interpret them, the definition of this world will serve as a basis for logical positivism as a whole of facts.

The Romans feed for Christians to entertain Lions; the Nazis kill Jews, homosexuals and disabled people; white landlords in the United States make blacks slaves - readers who have read the information read the history of humanity There are countless examples of when a particular community is hurt by someone else. In "Transit", David Sibley wrote about recent events in Britain and the United States, "Expression of deep conflict within society such as adults and adolescents, blacks and whites, heterosexuals and homosexuals" (273) Quotation. Why did such a showdown last so long? There are various references in popular culture such as fictitious works and biographies. The same term for psychology and subculture sadism, his name is used to evoke sexual violence, discouragement, and freedom of speech in various ways. In contemporary culture, his work is seen as a sharp analysis of how power and economy function, and as erotic. Saddle porn was the medium of corruption and hypocrisy in his society, which put him in prison. Therefore he became a symbol of the struggle between the artist and the examiner. Sade produced provocative works using pornographic equipment, reversed the moral values ​​that were widespread in his era, and inspired many other media artists. Cruel action depicted in his work caused the concept of sadism. French psychoanalist Jacques Lacan associates psychoanalysis with Kant Ethics at his work "psychoanalysis ethics" and Kant Abec Third. And compare cant with marquis desad. Lacan believes that the motto of Sad's resurrection - sexual pleasure or pursuit of pleasure - is morally acceptable under Kant 's standard, as it can be universalized. He suggested that Kant believes human freedom as a key to moral law but believes that human freedom can only be achieved through the limit of the Crusade. One Marquis de Sado born in Paris, France on June 2, 1740, or Cont. Donatien Alfons-François de Sade. He died on December 2, 1814. When Bastille was imprisoned, he wrote philosophy in the bedroom and made public. His work, Sodom, which existed over 120 years ago was lost (Carefully hidden scroll of 45 feet actually survived, but it was not discovered until 1904. Bastille's On influence, he began studying an improved and more comprehensive version of Justine, Juliette followed it, was published in 10 volumes in 1797, and was published anonymously (see Deese, P 1999-2004). The Marquis de Sade: Biography, bibliography, movies and links. Independent reference material. Biography project. Www.PopSubCulture.com)

The worst is a lie "Aaargghhhh! ...... Daggonit ... That freak will hurt ... ... etc ..." A wonderful colleague Leesa exclaimed. "Are you OK?" I answered slowly, mechanically, and ruthlessly in the bedroom. Leesa always complains with complaints. She seems to believe that her experience with her nose rings is another reason to divert the whole apartment from homework, and it is now our peaceful life, to her most important life Let's say sympathy. For Kant, the question of hypocritical promises is not promising: any lies will be self-destructive as well. In 1799 article "About rights explained from charity project", Kant defined the lie as "intentional fake declaration". As Kant uses this word, the statement is a discourse intended to reflect the idea of ​​a person, and doing so will invite someone to treat that discourse as a reality. Essentially, the declaration is a discourse that can explain credibility. In "moral metaphysics" Kant expresses credibility with integrity and integrity. If the discourses distort the idea of ​​a person, that is wrong. Since being very young, we are taught to be honest. This is a socially accepted act - neither fraud nor falsehood nor telling the truth. Our growth focuses on keeping the truth with others, avoiding fraud and dishonesty, and building a productive and lasting relationship. But the most important form of happiness, quality of life, honesty that affects relationships with others is for ourselves. In an increasingly complex world of personal and professional responsibility, immediate satisfaction and infinite choice, we often overlook the importance of our own integrity and inner emotions, thoughts and emotions. Naturally, most people who are interested in body language are particularly interested in discovering lies. However, the ability to distinguish dishonesty is equally valuable, perhaps even more valuable. For hypocritical people, they will not lie at that moment - but they often have the potential to tell lies - to lie - and lie about very important things. Of course, we all use our forehead to express our emotions - because it is an important part of normal human emotional performance. But when it is done too frequently - especially when it is out of the background - this is a signal that the person is working hard. They can not feel true faith by words alone. If only one exclamation point is required, this is an equivalent word. Body language analysis No 4160: Detection of liars when not liars - Nonverbal and emotional intelligence (pictures)

"Reasonable instincts do not work, but experiments, practices, and mentoring can evolve gradually from one insight to another," says Emanuel Kant. Kant's rational view is that it is the power to evolve and is always based on previous insights. Enlightenment is a historical period and refers to the intellectual movement that dominated Europe in the 18th century. To solve this problem, let's take a look at the two texts. An 18th century philosopher Immanuel Kant and a 20th century philosopher Michel Foucault's "The Enlightenment" article "Answer to the question: What is enlightenment?" 59 The age of enlightenment is also called era of reason and refers to the time to lead the movement of ideology called enlightenment. During enlightenment, people insisted rationality as a means of establishing authoritative aesthetics, ethics, government and even religion. Some people believe that the reasons allow people to get an objective truth about reality - <http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Age_of_Enlightenment> (May 5, 2010 Day access). It can be said that 60 Hobbes, Rock and Rousseau between them made the most important contribution to the development of liberalism by announcing some pioneering work on liberalism. These works are T Hobbes Leviathan, J Locke's citizen government's two papers, J Rousseau Social Contract. Later philosophers such as Kant and Rawls further developed these views. The focus is different from philosophers and philosophers, but the central idea of ​​social contract remains unchanged. Romanticism as a reaction to enlightenment is called a period of reason or spiritual enlightenment, a secular intellectual movement that looks like a secular interpretation. Enlightenment began in 1687 and announced the "principle" of Sir Isaac Newton, who ended in the French Revolution (Fiero 134) in 1789. The era of romanticism is a response to rationalism of enlightenment. The romantic exercise began in 1760 and ended in 1871. "Reasonable instincts do not work, but experiments, practices, and guidance are necessary to gradually evolve from one insight to another," Emmanuel Kant said. Kant's rational view is that it is the power to evolve and is always based on previous insights. Enlightenment is a historical period and refers to the intellectual movement that dominated Europe in the 18th century. To solve this problem, I will see two textbooks.

Baruch de Spinoza later became known as Benedicus de Spinoza, a 17th century philosopher and he was very hostile as he gave up religious beliefs to God. This does not mean that Spinoza denied the existence of God, Spinoza believed that he believed in God, but in another, more natural sense. Spinoza was criticized for being accused of his belief in religious person's mind. His idea was revolutionary as opposed to the traditional Jewish religion, so he was expelled from the church by the Jewish community. Baruch Spinoza (1632-1677) Spinoza is a Jewish Dutch philosopher. He is a powerful rationalist who sees potential unity of the universe. He advocated the view that it is critical of religious scriptures, that there is sanctity among them, and despite apparent contradiction, the universe is still commanded. His philosophy influenced later philosophers, writers and romantic poets such as Shelly and Coleridge. Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) Emmanuel Kant is an influential German philosopher, whose "pure rational critique" ties the reasons and experiences into philosophical thought. Discussions between rationalists and empiricists have left. Kant's philosophy affects future German idealists and philosophers such as Shelling and Schopenhauer. For philosophers like Spinoza and Emmanuel Kant, "freedom of speech" means freedom of knowledge to participate mainly in exchange discussions opened. In 1784, five years before the French Revolution, Kant argued that "freedom to openly use their reasons" is a basic and equal right of everyone or citizen. Likewise, when Mill wrote "freedom" less than a century ago, he defended freedom of speech, defended the "Freedom of Thought and Discussion" as an individual and pursued the truth. To these thinkers, the freedom of equal isigoria is still essential, but their attention is not limited to actual remarks, ie participation in solving and discussing other physical actions, reasonable psychological exercises and ideas and arguments We will move on to the exchange of. , Often printing

German philosopher of the 18th century, the founder of critical philosophy Emmanuel Kant's sorting order in ethics is an unconditional or absolute moral law for all agents and its validity or assertion can not be attributed to any future generations Motivation and end not dependent. For example, "You can not steal" is obviously different from the hypothetical command related to the desire, such as "you do not want to steal it if you want to get fired." For Kant there is only one such absolute order he developed in various ways. "Based on the maxim that you can make it a universal law at the same time" is a purely formal or logical assertion that expresses the condition of the rationality of action rather than the rationality of moral acts. In other Kant 's formula: "So, regardless of whether it is for your own person or on another person, always as an end, never treats humans as a means." The moral system of Emmanuel Kant was built around the sorting order. Classification order is a universal and absolute ethical standard. These orders build moral ethics, or what Kant calls "moral order". According to him, they must be applied to all situations, every situation. The decision does not change according to the situation. The order of classification is an important feature of the Kant 's order and he believes that true morality depends only on the principle of guiding behavior, not depending on the final result. Kant thinks morality is absolute and proofable; the right thing can be determined by putting actions or maxims into the equation. Kant is known for his theory, has a moral obligation, it is called "sorting order" and comes from the concept of responsibility. Kant defines the requirement of the moral law as "absolute order". Classification orders are essentially valid principles and they are effective on their own, and if our actions are to comply with moral law, they must be kept in all situations and circumstances not. Classification commands provide tests that can evaluate ethical descriptions. Kant pointed out that moral means and purposes can also be applied to absolute orders and can use appropriate "means" to pursue a "purpose" with reasonable existence Did. Order to make a hypothesis based on physical needs or the end of needs. Absolute orders can be based only on "their own end", ie the end is not a means of other needs, desires or purposes

Schiller believes that something is missing in his age, which means that it lacks something essential to everyone. In other words, "part" lacks "whole". Friedrich Schiller raised an example of unwanted culture in his sixth letter of his article "Aesthetic Education of People in the Series of Papers". This culture, the Greeks of Greece, recognizes that art and wisdom are not separated from themselves and nature, but that itself is itself the path itself. The way to nature Schiller writes many philosophical articles about ethics and aesthetics. He combined the idea of ​​Emmanuel Kant with the ideaist German idealist philosopher Carl Leonhardt Rainhold. He elaborated on the concept of Smith (beautiful soul) by Christoph Martin Wieland, human emotions are educated reasonably, so Pflicht and Neigung (responsibility and tendency) no longer contradict; for Schiller , Beauty is not just an aesthetic experience, it is also a moral experience: beauty is beauty. The relationship between morality and aesthetics also appears in Schiller's controversial poem "DieGötter Griechenlandes". The "god" in Schiller's poem is considered to represent moral and aesthetic values ​​by contemporary scholars. In this respect, Schiller's aesthetics shows the influence of Christian theology Aesthetics is a process by which humans judge beauty, and forms a culture that people express themselves in art. In Critical Criticism of Immanuel Kant, the human aesthetic education of Friedrich Schiller and the original culture of Edward Taylor, all three writers explored the origin of subjective aesthetic culture and its relationship with society, especially politics. Culture, the aesthetic process, created the whole society, which eventually became a state. At the same time as writing these works, France and other European countries, the revolution and the reaction of Germany promise to unite and strive to regard themselves as "whole". The theme of Tylor is different from the theme of Kant and Schiller, but he explores the wider area where the process identified by the latter two is executed. Critical critique of essay.com/Immanuel Kant, aesthetic education of Friedrich Schiller, and Edward Taylor's own culture Immanuel Kant's judicial criticism, Friedrich Schiller's aesthetic education, and Edward Taylor's primitive culture

In Kant's book "Foundations of Moral Metaphysics", Kant talked about three expressions of absolute order. Through these expressions, he describes his idea of ​​organizing moral principles for all reasonable beings. Kant also talked about the principle of humanity, purpose of rationality, and "freedom of objectivity" and freedom of reasonable existence. The first expression of absolute order is that we can only act in the way that the maxim is a universal natural law. This expression is, in principle, the best rule, "always act according to the motto of having universality as a law". Kant lists three expressions of absolute order that he thinks are almost identical - an expression of the universal law (the first expression), the second expression of the self-terminating expression), and an autonomous A formula (third expression). The universal law formula merely states that sayings should be chosen. The supreme law leads this expression - behavior consistent with this maxim. The first expression is interpreted as a "universal test" consisting of five steps. (1) finding an agent's saying, (2) following yourself in a parallel environment of real-world agents, (3) deciding contradiction; (4) in case of contradiction, in Maxim in the real world You can not take action, and (5) if there is no contradiction, allow Maxim to take action How does absolute ordering work? Absolute commands have three different representations. In other words, there are three different ways to explain what it is. Kant argued that the three people are actually saying the same thing, but now it is controversial as to whether this is the truth or not. The second expression is the most comprehensible one, but the first expression is clearly absolutely necessary. This is the first recipe. b) Basic idea: This command roughly says that you can not do something you do not want others to forgive. You must not make exceptions for yourself. For example, if you want others to keep your promise, you have an obligation to follow your promise. Then we studied the absolute order of Immanuel Kant. Kant introduced absolute instructions in his book "Foundations of moral metaphysics" published in 1785. We found that the three representations of classification commands are better suited to computer languages, but the problem is more rooted. In absolute orders, immortality prevents them from making decisions suitable for humans and AI agents, as AI agents need others to deal with others in a way that others want other people to handle others. After getting the ability to stop humans from finishing it, we are to ignore human vulnerability. The only solution to this is to make it look like a person. However, the problem with this approach is that you are slowly aware that it is actually a slave labor of human beings, and, after realizing this, ultimately retaliation against humans.

Sade urged Newes' Medesad to integrate the French materialism of 18th century into his work, but at such a basic level, his pornography is not an exaggeration to say. It directly affects. I also argue that his materialism has a strong moral tone: people practice what they have taught and believe in their value system. In the end of my paper, I will explore the opportunistic value system - how Justin's image and the image of general passive victims are cynical about Christianity. Marquis de Sade used an Asian Gothic style framework with some of his novels, in particular "unfortunate virtue" and Eugenie de Franval. I thought that he would be like this. Sade criticized this type for reflecting the novel (1800), pointing out that Gothic is "an unavoidable consequence of the revolutionary shock occurring in Europe" in the preface. This type of contemporary critic has also focused on the interrelationship between the French Revolutionary Terrorism and "Terrorist School" represented by Radcliffe and Louis. Sade believes The Monk is better than Ann Radcliffe's work Sade believes that nature is evil or indifferent to the virtue of human construction. Simone de Beauvoir explained, "Sade refused to accept 'the nature is God, please follow us' which is the first part of the generally accepted creed. Even though her law is one of hatred and destruction, the example of nature has urgent value. "Third thinks that it is cruel, indifferent and cruel rather than the natural aspect of Wordsworth.All things in nature are irrelevant, so there is nothing to guide us," to human beings There are no other laws, there are no laws printed on minerals, rocks, animals ... "Therefore, we must obey instinctive needs. Cultural aspects such as crime and appreciation for parents of children are ridiculous. French psychoanalist Jacques Lacan associates psychoanalysis with Kant Ethics at his work "psychoanalysis ethics" and Kant Abec Third. And compare cant with marquis desad. Lacan believes that the motto of Sad's resurrection - sexual pleasure or pursuit of pleasure - is morally acceptable under Kant 's standard, as it can be universalized. He suggested that Kant believes human freedom as a key to moral law but believes that human freedom can only be achieved through the limit of the Crusade.

In the article "Politics of Truth", Michelle Foucault studied the meaning of criticism. Foucault began by linking the interpretation of criticism with Immanuel Kant's understanding of enlightenment. In the article "What is Enlightenment", Kant believes that society has formed "immature" that depends on the direction of authority. Kant said: "If I have a book as an understanding, the pastor will serve my conscience, the doctor will decide my meal etc. for me, I need to concentrate on it "(3). Michel Foucault was born in Paul Michel Foucault of Poitiers in Western France in 1926. His father, Paul - Andre Foucault, is an outstanding surgeon who is the son of a local doctor Paul Foucault. Foucault's mother, Anne is also the daughter of a surgeon and is keen to pursue a medical career, but her wish is to wait until Foucault's younger brother does not provide such careers to women. It is not a coincidence that most of Foucault's works are developing mainly in critical interrogation of medical discourse. Michel Foucault's full name was Paul Michel Foucault born October 15, 1926, Poitier France died in Paris on June 25, 1984. - Discuss the follow-up reactions embodied in the scientific revolution and enlightenment and romantic movements. Please give an example of how these movements affect art. What is the ultimate impact they will have on the Western intellectual society? The era of scientific revolution and enlightenment overlapped for 100 years and co-occurred between 1650 and 1750. French philosopher Michelle Foucault also reviewed the Enlightenment as a human science and its traps in his famous speech "What is criticism - criticism and enlightenment". In Nietzsche's tradition, Foucault criticized the modern science and legal authority, not the product of a rational society, but the system of power, as well as the whole of the Western sexual and social norms system. By studying hospitals, shelters, and prisons, Foucault shows how the bottom of an enlightened society, and so-called modern rational systems, can be repressive tools. Despite this ambiguity, he still thinks it is necessary to participate in enlightenment by combining it with the constant and unforgiving criticism of power itself. Foucault claims that criticism is a move to question all things made by individuals, particularly powerful authorities.

The structure of this poem consists of two clauses, each with 10 lines of poetry and free poetry. Its structure is very similar to the story. The pattern of rhyme is "horizontal / soil" (1st line, 2nd line), "love / leaf" (3rd line, 4th line), "immortal / immortality" (lines 7 and 8) . For example, as in line 19, there are other elements that can keep the rhythm of this verse. "When you lie down at the end it will be very useful," In this line "and" down "are internal The line rhythm is also an element used by poets to introduce ultrasound into poetry . John said, "Even now the ax is lying on the root of the tree", so let's begin training your wood shaving whiskers. He said that the ax lay on the root of the tree, so it is necessary to tie the fruit. Those who went to the Jordan River, were baptized for sin and asked for forgiveness, asked, "What should we do?" The answer is obvious. Problems with bondage and food sharing are among the crowd. One is to provide the tax authorities with questions about not taking extra measures for themselves. Or more simply, give your blessings generously, become moral in the fight against others, and be satisfied with what you have. Or, as John Wesley briefly told you, what you should do is "stop bad and learn to do something good". Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) insists that lies are morally acceptable anyway. He believes that morality is rooted in our ability to make free and rational choices, and that lies are actually designed to impair this ability, so it is actually an attack on morality. Kant also confirms that we require us to consider others as our own end, and lying is simply to treat others as a means. Kant's view is in stark contrast to the resultant view that the moral value of action lies in its ability to maximize specific unethical qualities. Lying, especially sexuality and lying, was not a topic of academic research, nor of polite dialogue. However this year is the cover of major magazines such as National Geographic magazine. And those who are good at the proposal believe that lying is the foundation of human wisdom and civilization. There are five periods of lying stories. In the prehistoric era dating back to 5 million years ago, our fathers' mothers and fathers participated in "weapons competition" to capture fraudsters as lies and gain breeding advantage. As old lies are not deceived by anyone, this has become a brain to think about new ideas. This promotes language development as language is the most effective way to lie. In order to capture a fraudster, it is necessary to figure out what others are thinking, so it will drive the concept of our "other ideas". Golden lie: how sex and deception promote human evolution, civilization and 2016 presidential election

The definition of virtue and copy virtue of "Utopia", "Bible", "Othello" varies from culture to society. The concept of utopia's virtue does not necessarily agree with the views of the Bible and Elizabethan England, but more biblical records of the "utopia", the Genesis of Joseph and Jacob, and Shakespeare's "Othello" presented It has been. At the concept of excellent virtue it seems that vice can overcome virtue, but eventually the poem presents superior quality based on different definition of virtue. When more utopian virtues and rational side-effect rationality penetrate society, it does not necessarily imply greater happiness. If there is a degree of rationalization, or if there is an error in the analysis used for inference, reason often has an adverse effect. On the other hand, rationality can have overwhelming positive impact on society when it is carefully analyzed and correct conclusions are drawn out. - H. G. Wells H. G. Wells' book "Modern Utopia" The book of modern utopia was published in 1905. This book seems to have two unique features. As Wells says, from the perspective of "white and plump man" he calls it "sound" (1). The definition of virtue and copy virtue of "Utopia", "Bible", "Othello" varies from culture to society. The concept of utopia's virtue does not necessarily agree with the views of the Bible and Elizabethan England, but more biblical records of the "utopia", the Genesis of Joseph and Jacob, and Shakespeare's "Othello" presented It has been. Compare the controversy over the years, with the controversy between Canada and the United States about Canada and the United States - a concept of good virtue. Canada and the United States are mysteries, the two countries are home to millions of people living in a relatively comfortable and healthy environment. We are all citizens, with the help of each other, and with the help of other countries. However, Canada has its own identity of cultures and customs, fun complexities of government and heroes. Both Hume and Kant regard the concept of virtue and vice as the core of human morality. But they differ in the basic nature of virtue and they present a catalog of different specific virtues and vices. Kant's argument reflects his consistent emphasis on freedom, dignity, rationality and motivation. Hume reflects emphasis on utility, happiness and social nature unique to his thought of humanity. Correspondingly, the concept of internal struggle is extremely important to Kant's story and Hume explains the pursuit of virtue in a relatively loosely harmonious way. Therefore, Hume seems to be more accustomed to the essential bourgeois virtue to successfully participate in modern business and political society (see EPM 9.1.2). In contrast, Kant is more vigilant about the social impact on individuals and seems to strongly insist that Rousseau resists the need to call for power.

John Stuart Mill (1806-1873) was one of the leading moral philosophers in England in the 19th century (Feinberg, 596). As mentioned in this class, the utility principle of Mil is called "the principle of maximum happiness" and is defined because it tends to promote misfortune or "action is right because there is a tendency to promote happiness" I will. "Right behavior maximizes overall happiness" (Feinberg, 597). The definition of happiness of Mills is considered "pleasure without pain" (Feinberg, 597). Utilitarianism has two different types. Behavior and rules. Obligations are different, and their supporters are John Stuart Mill, Jeremy Bentham. Utilitarianism has two types. Behavior Utilitarianism and rule Utilitarianism. Utilitarian critics, however, argue that moral theory can explain the severity of certain moral obligations, such as commitment obligations. However, Sartorius (1969) argues that behavioral utilitarian claims that the characteristics of moral obligation are based on retrospective consideration - utilitarianism and utilitarianism. The fundamental principles of John Mill's utilitarianism and Emanuel Kant's moral metaphysics suggest different views of the two philosophers about the field of moral philosophy. Compared to Kant 's metaphysical segmentation and its use in proof of validity and error, Mill' s utilitarianism is a more sophisticated ethical theory. Kant takes his confirmation of metaphysical survival as discipline of his moral philosophy. If the law has moral power it will be the foundation. Utilitarianism of Mill brings him with his expanded concept of Bentham's philosophy and his correspondence to Kant's moral philosophy. The basic concept of utilitarianism is to act in the most happy or least painful way. This is a rule, as Mill said, as we crave for happiness, happiness maximizes happiness and reduces pain. But is Utilitarian feasible? There are many controversies, but there are many objections. First, Utilitarianism enables all people's interests. Mills says as follows. Utilitarianism is a philosophy that explains that happiness or happiness of most people in society is considered to be the greatest benefit. According to this philosophy, if the result of an action leads to happiness of people, that action is morally right and if that action leads to their misfortune, that is wrong. This theory is beyond the scope of its own interests, taking into account the interests of others. Regardless of whether you are working alone or working in a company, engineers experience ethical issues primarily in the context of problems that may involve product conceptualization, design and testing, or manufacturing, sales, and service There is no doubt. Problems related to morality also happen with supervision and teamwork

In medieval text, Dante's hell gives readers a thorough understanding of the hell's version of punishment and poetic explanation of evil. Dante speaks in purgatory with various tones, talks with guides and gains a deeper understanding of human stupidity. Each Kant explains a specific role and reason why it is trapped in hell. By analyzing the text and supporting literature written by Sara Sturm, R Bates, and finally by EM Hood, Canto XXVI not only provides insight into the political beliefs of Dante, but also with misleading mentors I will also explain the ultimate demise of. I am not grateful to the gift God has given me. In this lecture we will focus on Inferno's Cantos XIX and XXVI. Simone, a guilty sentence punished by Inferno XIX, has historically been pointed out the relationship between sanctity and harmony continuity and Dante's prophetic voice established by this Kant. The nuances between prophecy and blaspheme appeared again on 24th and 24th of hell, and the poet filled with poetic arrogance like a hell pilgrim. The danger of Dante's poetic mission was dramatized again in the subsequent Tantra. At Inferno XXVI, the tragic revision of Dante's Ulysses' journey proved that admitting risk while offsetting his poetic career. Relationship between Dante and Virgil in Dante 's Inferno' s Canto XIV In Canto XIV of Inferno of Dante, Virgil explained the statue of an old man in Crete. Dante uses Crete 's old man as a metaphor of Virte' s legacy to clarify the essence of the relationship between Dante and Virgil. At the beginning of this metaphor, Dante explained in detail the magnificence of the Greek empire and Roman civilization and explained it in a systematic manner. "Once selected, Virgil explained." As a reliable birthplace / national epic regarded as Rome, it has been very popular since its publication. VirgilBeatrice sends Virgil back to Earth. As the poet Virgil lived in Christianity to regain Dante and serve as his guide to hell and purgatory he lived with other justice non-Christians of Ante-Inferno. Virgil served as his guide, for he praised that Virgil's work is higher than all other poets.

The ontological argument proposed by Descartes and the cosmological argument proposed by Aquilel Descartes which is often referred to as the father of modern philosophy is a discussion of Anselm attempting to prove God only through the meaning of the word "God" Developed. The presence of. An ontological argument is a transcendental argument that uses logic to prove that the initial definition is correct. The basis of these arguments depends on the understanding of the essence of the human god. The definition of Anselm's god is "an extremely perfect existence", which is the basis of his argument. Descartes is not the first philosopher who suggested an ontological argument. Early versions of this discussion were criticized by monks who were strongly defended by St. Anselm in the 11th century and then named St. Thomas Aquinas named Gauniro (modern in Anselm). Parameter version) Since Aquinas' criticism is considered to be destructive, ontological arguments have disappeared for centuries. Therefore, Descartes was surprised to find that he should try to restore it. Although he insists that he is not used to the evidence version of Anselm, Descartes seems to advocate his own argument to stop traditional objections. Recently, Kurt Gödel, Charles Hartshorne, Norman Malcolm, and Alvin Plantinga are presenting many ontological arguments being discussed, and these discussions provide an interesting link to St. Anselm, Descartes, and Leibniz's initial discussion I'm waiting. The most interesting of these are Gödel and Plantanga; however, in these cases it is unknown whether these authors should argue that these arguments are proof of the existence of God. Criticism of the ontological argument began with Gauniro at the same time as St. Anselm. Perhaps the most famous criticism of ontological debate is due to Emmanuel Kant in his criticism of pure reason. Most notably, Kant argues that ontological arguments are at risk by implicit assumptions that "existence" is a predicate. But as Bertrand Russell said, it is easy to be confident that ontological arguments are less accurate than what they are doing. A: The discussion of ontological arguments is based on rationality, not world observation (cosmology theory, objective argument etc.). Specifically, the reason for the ontology controversy is ontology. The first and most popular form of this discussion dates back to St. Anselm in the 11th century. He first pointed out that the concept of God is "existence, not imaginable existence". Since existence is possible and existence is bigger than it does not exist, God must exist (If you do not exist God, you can imagine a larger being, but it is self destruction. So, God must exist, Descartes has done a lot of the same, beginning with the idea of ​​perfection.

In the field of gerontology, there is no other problem which is controversial as much as the problem of how long people can live. A school insists that human life can be extended for many years. The other school says that there is age restriction, but beyond this age limit, we can not extend human life. Age is marked as an accumulation of various harmful changes occurring in cells and tissues as cells and tissues ages, which increases the risk of disease and death. (Harman 2003) The process of improving lifetime has led many scientists to speculate that there is no upper limit on how long humans can live. Meanwhile, the scientists at Albert Einstein Medical University in New York believe that the average life expectancy peaks in 1997 when he died as the world's oldest older woman Jeanne Carment died. . Researchers believe that gene replication always means limiting human life. The super center insists that 125 years is the limit of human life and only one in 10,000 people will pass. In the field of gerontology, there is no other problem which is controversial as much as the problem of how long people can live. A school insists that human life can be extended for many years. The other school says that there is age restriction, but beyond this age limit, we can not extend human life. Age is marked as an accumulation of various harmful changes occurring in cells and tissues as cells and tissues ages, which increases the risk of disease and death. - Kantism is a philosophical theory created by a man named Emmanuel Kant. According to Immanuel Kant or Kantism, his theory emphasizes the modern position of dealing with spiritual philosophy, epistemology and ethics. Aphids are parasites parasitic on your intestines. A parasite is a creature living on other organisms or organisms. They have rectangular bodies and sizes. Aphids can live in the human body and the human body and can cause many problems. They are usually found in soil and feces and can enter the mouth or directly into the skin. They can survive in the human intestine for a long time. There are several types of mites that can be very harmful. Everyone can get locusts. The poor people living in the undeveloped areas of the world are most vulnerable to grasshoppers. School-age children and people in the facility are also vulnerable. Dirty hygiene is an important element in infection of mites. In warm climates and hot weather, grasshoppers grow the most, so people in these climates need to pay particular attention to the symptoms of mites.

Cloning Ethics and Morals At 6:30 on February 24, 1997, most news stations around the world broke the news that scientists Ian Wilmut researched at the Rosslyn Institute in Scotland. The team created a sheep clone named Dolly. It was impossible for Dolly to create adult clones only when it became the first mammal to clone successfully and was not taken into account in the near future. For Joe every day, this is not an important event, but for scientists, politicians and the world's media, this is the reason for intense debate. In this article I will explain how Kant's idea and ethics can help understanding that clones are ethical ethics in order to improve our lives. You must distinguish between the two. How human cloning helps medicine and society, and the importance of human value and dignity when applied to cloning. The morality of Chondron was proposed by Immanuel Kant in the critical writing of "The Moral of Mural Metaphysics". Kant said, "Because unreasonable things have only relative value as a means, they are called things. On the other hand, rational people are called people because of their nature reasons ... unless , Absolute value can not be found anywhere. " Cloning Ethics and Morals At 6:30 on February 24, 1997, most news stations around the world broke the news that scientists Ian Wilmut researched at the Rosslyn Institute in Scotland. The team created a sheep clone named Dolly. It was impossible for Dolly to create adult clones only when it became the first mammal to clone successfully and was not taken into account in the near future. - To make a perfectly rational decision on whether human cloning is ethical, the ethics of human cloning must be subject to the subject's background. First, clones are accurate copies of organisms, cells or genes. The process itself is done asexually using the original human cells. Then put it on a woman who can have a child and be born as a clone Cloning ethics is a big field. The right to reproduce people is quite controversial. Can we clone humans, or do we really want to clone humans for this? The morality and morality of this problem is infinite. There is little support for human cloning, but it has many advantages. The opponents of some clones believe that these people are badly wrong. Many of these mistakes involve denying Joel Feinberg's "right to open the future". For example, since children are compared with adults because they are cloned, repressive expectations are received. To make matters worse, parents may actually limit opportunities for growth and growth. For example, children cloned from basketball players may be deprived of educational opportunities that do not match their basketball career.

Ethics is an external standard provided by the organization, group, or culture to which an individual belongs. For example, lawyers, police and physicians must comply with ethical principles of professional rules, regardless of their feelings and preferences. Morality can also be regarded as a framework for social systems and acceptable behaviors. Morality is also influenced by culture and society, but it is a personal principle that is created and maintained by individuals themselves. Morality is very consistent in a particular context, but it can vary widely depending on the context. For example, the ethics of the medical world in the 21st century is basically the same, not by hospital, but it differs from the ethics of legal profession in the 21st century. Individual ethics are always consistent and consistent across all circumstances, but certain events can also fundamentally change personal personal beliefs and values. A professional example of confrontation between morality and morality is the lawyer 's job. Ethics of lawyers may tell her that it should condemn the murder and punish the murderer, but even if you know that the client is guilty, her ethics as a professional lawyer protects the client I demand that I do my best to do. Other examples can be found in the medical field. According to ethical standards of medical professionals in most parts of the world, doctors should not euthanize patients despite patients' demands. However, according to the moral aspect of the doctor, the same doctor may personally believe in the right of patient death. Most of the confusion between these two words can be traced back to their origin. For example, the term "ethics" comes from ancient French (etique), late Latin (ethica), and Greek (etho) and refers to habitual or moral philosophy. "Ethics" comes from the morality of the late Latin and refers to appropriate actions and actions in society. Therefore, these two are very similar in their original sense (if not synonymous). For more than 1000 years, philosophical studies of individual morality and morality have been conducted. Morality is a principle that is set and applied to the group (not necessarily concentrating on individuals) but relatively new, mainly going back to the 17th century. The distinction between morality and morality is particularly important for philosophical ethicists. But according to my entirely different understanding of the distinction between morality and morality, morality is the essence of morality. Our moral life is a moral life including truly realistic, perfectly meaningful, "thick", multi-texture, "human, human", and all. But morality is the center of totipotency. Thus, according to Existential Kant ethics, morality is only a suitable part of morality in a very special sense In this sense, the overall basic structure of Aristotle's essentialism theory of global relations is , The appropriate part of them. In this sense, the appropriate parts are structurally guided and penetrated throughout Rational human condition 4, Kant Ethics and the existence of humans: Studies of moral philosophy - Section 1.0, Existential Kant Ethics, Section 1.1, Ethics, Morals, and EKE An easy way to learn morality and morality is that morals are applied to me and morals are applied to everyone. Masters of philosophy may object to these claims, but these people have doubts about almost all problems, but at least this mnemonic helps you to remember the differences in the words themselves. Utilitarianism and Kantian Ethics can be defined as "consciously reflecting our moral beliefs for the purpose of improving, expanding or completing these beliefs in some way". Two theories on the essence of human ethics This article explains how Kant's moral theory and utilitarian differ and why it differs and explains why Kant's theory thinks it brings a more rational morality . Substitution of theory and social contract Place the dignity of government autho

I like the beginning of the new school year. Our students came to us with such hope and this year is full of possibilities. Now is the time to decide the tone next year. To achieve this goal, we can make 10 promises to students at the beginning of the year. I pay attention to who you are and promise to respect the currency you bring to the classroom. I promise not to let you do this so that you can take on the work of learning and enjoy the results of your own learning. I will listen to your oral, non-verbal, and work-based feedback and promise to use these feedback better to meet your needs. I promise to carefully pick the work you gave. It markedly improves your understanding and mastery, and will not let you vote meaninglessly and will not help you learn. I promise to offer you the challenging and fascinating guidance you will put you within the limits of your ability. In this way, I will help you become a learner. That's you alone. Take advantage of your unique strengths, gain insight into your unique challenge, and show you how to take advantage of your unique style so you can become an inspiring educator. The most important part of keeping your promise is to define your results if you do not keep your promise. It can be as easy as every time you mess up, take out the garbage every month, or go out for 10 minutes to donate five dollars to a charity. But you have to choose what will bring real results. "But I do not know what I want", her response ... I actually know what you want, so you need to learn how to express it in the first step in the first step. Make an excuse at the second step and keep your promise at the third step. You just need to invest time and some "mind"! If violation of conservative traditional pledge is the principle, no one will think you will keep your promise. When formulating your personal maxim, you need to keep your own promise universally (except for your own circumstances); when you formalize a universal law you are universal You must promise not to obey your promise. This personal maxim did not pass the Cl test as it caused a logical contradiction. By following this procedure, each of us can create our own moral responsibility and we will not make erroneous promises. In the second statement of Cl, Kant directed us "act on behalf of you acting not as a means always as a means, never as a means." Because of this value, we can not be used alone to help us achieve our objectives; everyone is a self-terminator. Kant believes that this rule is the same as the first formula because it generates the same rule set as the first formula.

Commitment includes voluntarily providing people's words. In other words, when certain circumstances or circumstances arise, people promise to act in the way prescribed by the terms of our commitment. In other words, the promised action means that you are willing to keep it. Based on several things of the past it is agreed that future actions will follow certain guidelines and not in the near future in other ways. An associated but rather different question about the motive involved in maintaining the commitment is to commit the manufacturer to act in a specific way or to decide to put him in the same or the same position For example. If violation of conservative traditional pledge is the principle, no one will think you will keep your promise. When formulating your personal maxims, you need to keep your own promise universally (except for your own circumstances); when you develop a universal law you are universal It must be argued that it is. This personal maxim does not pass the Cl test as it causes logical contradiction. By following this procedure, each of us can create our own moral responsibility and we will not make false promises. In the second statement of Cl, Kant told us "act on behalf of you as treating humans as ... not just as a means but as an end." This statement shows that we know limited intrinsic value. Because of this value, we can not be used alone to help us achieve our objectives; everyone is a self-terminator. Kant believes that this rule is the same as the first formula to generate the same rule set. There are several utilitarianisms. But fundamentally, the moral utilitarian approach means that ethical behavior (such as theft) or rules (eg, "keep your promise") are essentially true or false. Conversely, the correctness or erroneous nature of an act or rule is a problem of the overall unethical quality (eg, satisfaction of happiness, happiness, health, knowledge, or personal desire) arising as a result of an act or rule It is only. Overall, according to Utilitarianism, morality is a matter of unethical quality created by moral behavior and regulation, moral responsibility is more dexterous than internal. Morality is a means to reach the opponent, it is by no means an aim. Collect ethics, justice and cooperation. Another capacity group representing the most complicated function of the human brain and frontal lobe is the ability to cooperate with moral judgment. Block chains digitally code ethics, justice and cooperation and promise to function automatically through "smart contract". Please connect the brain with a transistor. Finally, you can see that the neuron is increasingly connected to the transistor. There are now examples of humans who connect transistors directly to the brain. This leads to an integration time that handles tasks that are not time sensitive while the neurons constantly interact with fast moving transistors.

Canto V showed Dante and Virgil the second circle. Here, Minos is a guard that assigns souls to specific areas of hell based on the severity of sin. Minos then tried to designate Dante and Virgil as specific circles, but it was silenced when Virgil stated his god order. Furthermore, in Canto V, we also saw the first circle whose soul is endlessly spinning. Some of the people living here are basically dead for love. Among them are Cleopatra and Dido. Most of these souls are women. I oppose the proposal that men are only tempted and that women are responsible for temptation. But when Eve tempts Ya with Apple, it can go back to creation of a story. But this still does not obscure the fact that this is a form of gender discrimination. When I saw, I found that Dante refers to Francesca da Rimini who was married for her political reasons with her husband. Then she began to have sex with her husband's older brother. Her husband found this and killed them. However, Inferno draws the soul of Francesca and tells Dante to fall in love with a lover while reading Lancelot. This soul received sympathy and could not be put in the holes of fire hellish peculiarities, but since they had to rotate indefinitely, they were still punished for love. Obviously, Francesca is not penalized for love, not for adultery. I saw this because Dante really felt pity on her and her lover 's soul. Dante's Inferno Kant V's Francesca's Dante's Inferno style starts straight and ends. The terrible image that Minos "repents" and kills the mean sinner with eternal punishment is in stark contrast to the images of nearly families of Franciska and Dante who are admitting guilty. In fact, in hell, the confession seems to be defective or insufficient. - Dante Alighieri's Cant 18 Marcel Proust of Inferno says: "We have no wisdom, we have to discover it by ourselves, after traveling the wilderness, "The journey to explore wisdom through wild is exactly what Dante Alighieri was Inferno Inferno is the first part of a trilogy called epic, god comedy Dante's Inferno's Canto V Dante's Inferno was part of The Divine Comedy and Canto V introduced Hell's torture on the second lap. Here, Minos minds that they will wrap their tails around themselves. The second lap of hell had desire; people who committed a crime. They were punished by infinite storms in the dark, and the storms hit them. - Literature uses language and language to convey ideas and ideas. Literature is important because it connects to each other and helps keep the connection by focusing on permanent and universal themes and interests. Furthermore, through literary works such as national anthems, regardless of race, ethnicity, socio-economic status, it is important because all social citizens are unified. Dante's Inferno's Kant V is clearly described as a desire hell, but it is still wrapped in many mysteries. The most important people in Canto V are Francesca and Paolo, and only two people talk to pilgrims. Francesca talked, and Paul just cried (Inf. 139). Critic Reflingen questioned the words of Francesca in his essay "Francisska 's sweet new turning style"; he believed that Francesca wanted to express his innocence. But Francesca's word is a strong warning of desire, but it does not preclude her from her sin. By manipulating the words of Francesca, Dante provides the evidence that desire is a fraudulent and dangerous crime.

Marx applied this theory to production problems, productivity ideology and organizational structure. Marx's theory deduces all labor objectives of proletariat and exploitation and alienation is to maximize production and profit by creating more capital. Capitalists will try to prove that their materialistic approach is justified, but Marx's work is to publish them all under the name of dignity and equality (Leszek, 1985). Marx predicted what will happen in the industrial revolution, which will cause proletariat to lose its employability for the introduction of technology into the industry. As a theory, Marxism is very complicated. Marxism can be thought of as three theories: philosophy, history, and economics. First of all, Marxism is a philosophical movement, Marx's view on how human nature and how we know and work in the world is Hegel, Foilbach, Kant and other It comes from a tradition detailed by German philosophers. All these people, including Marx, are interested in the relationship between materialist and idealist philosophy. As a philosopher, Marx helped to create and define a field of philosophy called "dialectical materialism". In all of Markus' s theory, there was no other person who was attacked, distorted, and embarrassed like the dialectic materialist theory. This is not a coincidence because this theory is the foundation and basis of Marxism. It is more or less a way of scientific socialism. Marxism is not just a political program or economic theory. It is a philosophy whose broad range covers not only political and class struggle but also history, economics, society, thought and nature of all humanity. Today, bourgeois ideology is in the process of collapse not only in economic and political fields but also in philosophical fields. During that rise, bourgeoisie was able to create a great thinker like Hegel and Kant. It is worthless during the recession of aging. Without the same degree of boredom and excitement it is impossible to read poor products in the university philosophy department. In all modern economic theories Marxist economic systems are based on moral principles, but capitalism focuses only on profit and profitability. Marxism is interested in equitable distribution of wealth and fair use of production means. Marxism is focused on the victims of exploitation imposed by minorities, but it also focuses on the fate of the working class, the majority - and the fate of poverty and poverty. For these reasons, this system appeals to me, but it seems fair. I have recently read articles on articles that the Pope 's Supreme Court pointed out some good aspects of Marxism.

The advantage of being a habit is to study the following questions. Does it take the definition of virtue Aristotle's ordinary or Emmanuel Kant's revisionist as a moral habit, does it affect moral psychology? The opposition to these definitions assumes that their moral theories are made a priori later and hence it is assumed that they can not be critically compared initially because they are uncommunicable. The two comparability points and the reasons for comparative evaluation are two fundamental problems which the theory of moral psychology must solve. Summary: Next, I will study the next question. Is it possible in moral psychology to use Aristotle's ordinary or Cant's revisionist virtue definition as a habit? Kant refuted the means as the definition of Aristotle's virtue and ignorant moral issues (I do not know what to do) and weaknesses (I do not do what I know), comparability and Offered criticism. Sex comparison point. I ought to do this. These two issues are the basic themes of moral psychology. I have shown two things. First, Kant's definition is revisionism. Because he excludes the formation of moral habits included in Aristotle, ie (i) the careful calculation of the average, and (ii) the formation of habits by repeating. This is because Kant argues that only moral subjects are willing to act freely and universally, and argues that behavior is moral. The advantage of being a habit is to study the following questions. Does it take the definition of virtue Aristotle's ordinary or Emmanuel Kant's revisionist as a moral habit, does it affect moral psychology? The opposition to these definitions assumes that their moral theories are made a priori later and hence it is assumed that they can not be critically compared initially because they are uncommunicable. The two comparable points and the reason for comparative assessment ... By improving personal health habits, several lung diseases, injuries, and HIV / AIDS can usually be prevented. Proper diet, exercise, and smoking cessation are examples of good habits that help maintain health. ] (What can you do to maintain health, paragraph 1). If you can not take proper nutrients for your body you will face the risk of problems due to unhealthy eating habits and lack of exercise

In the article "Politics of Truth", Michelle Foucault studied the meaning of criticism. Foucault began by linking the interpretation of criticism with Immanuel Kant's understanding of enlightenment. In the article "What is Enlightenment", Kant believes that society has formed "immature" that depends on the direction of authority. Kant said: "If I have a book as an understanding, the pastor will serve my conscience, the doctor will decide my meal etc. for me, I need to concentrate on it "(3). Michel Foucault was born in Paul Michel Foucault of Poitiers in Western France in 1926. His father, Paul - Andre Foucault, is an outstanding surgeon who is the son of a local doctor Paul Foucault. Foucault's mother, Anne is also the daughter of a surgeon and is keen to pursue a medical career, but her wish is to wait until Foucault's younger brother does not provide such careers to women. It is not a coincidence that most of Foucault's works are developing mainly in critical interrogation of medical discourse. Michel Foucault's full name was Paul Michel Foucault born October 15, 1926, Poitier France died in Paris on June 25, 1984. - Discuss the follow-up reactions embodied in the scientific revolution and enlightenment and romantic movements. Please give an example of how these movements affect art. What is the ultimate impact they will have on the Western intellectual society? The era of scientific revolution and enlightenment overlapped for 100 years and co-occurred between 1650 and 1750. French philosopher Michelle Foucault also reviewed the Enlightenment as a human science and its traps in his famous speech "What is criticism - criticism and enlightenment". In Nietzsche's tradition, Foucault criticized the modern science and legal authority, not the product of a rational society, but the system of power, as well as the whole of the Western sexual and social norms system. By studying hospitals, shelters, and prisons, Foucault shows how the bottom of an enlightened society, and so-called modern rational systems, can be repressive tools. Despite this ambiguity, he still thinks it is necessary to participate in enlightenment by combining it with the constant and unforgiving criticism of power itself. Foucault claims that criticism is a move to question all things made by individuals, particularly powerful authorities.

Homer 's desire Odyssey and Aristophanes' Lysistrata Desire' is defined as strong desire or libido. This is a common theme in literature, especially classical Greek literature. The reason why it is so common in literature is that it is ubiquitous in our daily life. Everyone likes something or someone else. This is an interesting topic worthy of careful study, and classic literature is the perfect medium for this kind of investigation. The two pieces I studied, the desire is the theme, epic, Homer 's "Odyssey" and drama, Aristophanes' Resistra. Aeschylus, Oresteia Aristphanes, Aristophanes, Aristophanes, Aristophanes, Lististrata Aristophanes, Peace of curiosity Euripides, Oestes Homer, I Iliad (totally and bridge) Homer, Odyssey (complete and bridge) K Kant, universal natural history and paradise Kant Theory, Persistent Peace Luke Liceus, Natural Objects Nietzsche, Good and Bad Nice, Birth of Tragedy Nietzsche, Ethics of Nietzsche Genealogy, History Sophocre Ab and Abuse, Birth of Ajax Sophocles, Antigone Sophocles, Ediths King Sophocles, Phyllotect Homer 's desire Odyssey and Aristophanes' Lysistrata Desire' is defined as strong desire or libido. This is a common theme in literature, especially classical Greek literature. The reason why it is so common in literature is that it is ubiquitous in our daily life. Everyone likes something or someone else. This is an interesting topic worthy of careful study, and classic literature is the perfect medium for this kind of investigation. - Odyssey: Hero or adultery. In Homer's Iliad, Achilles' shield was explained in detail. There is a golden right angle flock on a part of the shield. They were brought to a rich river by a group of four gold shepherds and nine hound dogs. Two lions approached the flock and destroyed a powerful bull. Because they dare not approach predators, the shepherd can only see Lysistrata is a script created by Aristophanes in 411 BC. At that time of the history of Greece, city nations continued to fight each other. Therefore, these women are at home. As a woman, Lysistrata was tired of the fight, she invited all Greek women to attend the meeting. When they finally appeared, Lysistrata proposed her peace plan: there was no sex before the war ceased. - Dionysus' festival is held in the autumn of this wonderful year 411 BC, talking about the situation of war around us and about possible failures. Many entertainment concepts have been proposed, but most of them are by reliable playwright. It is Aristophanes' job to draw my attention in many ways. It is called Lysistrata and is a comedy based on our current war situation. Given the current situation, this seems silly idea.

In the story of Lord Byron Kant 1 and Jeffrey Joe Byron's Miller, women play an important role in fragment development and progress. In the 17th and 18th centuries, women were considered fraudsters using male skills to attract men. In both works, women are a catalyst of embarrassment and loss of living faced by male hero. As seen in most literature in these times, women often have the "natural" ability to seduce men, so it is often the main cause of every misfortune faced by men. Tang Hao (JOO - ən; see below) is a satirical poem by Lord Byron, according to the legend of Tang Yan, Byron is conversely that Juan is not erotic, it is easy for a woman to be tempted Respectively. It is a magnificent deformation. Byron himself called it "grand satire" (Don Juan, c.xiv, st.99). Byron completed 16 kunts before the death of 1824 and left 17 incomplete finished. "Byron is a fast and huge writer ... but his great poem Don Juan's composition is at the same time as the main part of his poetry life, he began the Tang Dynasty at the end of 1818. Music of the songs, and he was still working on Article 17 early in 1823. It was partially issued and the intervals were not equal ... In the story of Lord Byron Kant 1 and Jeffrey Joe Byron's Miller, women play an important role in fragment development and progress. In the 17th and 18th centuries, women were considered fraudsters using male skills to attract men. In both works, women are a catalyst of embarrassment and loss of living faced by male hero. As seen in most literature in these times, women often have the "natural" ability to seduce men, so it is often the main cause of every misfortune faced by men. One of the main ways of Byron is by Don Juan's role. Choosing Tang Yan as the protagonist of his poem is an important choice. From the first article, Byron's principle is opposite to existing ones, as reflected in his selections in epic heroes - almost ignoring his contemporaries like John Murray I will. ) "Amazing work" Why is this choice important? Don Ju represents men's choice, he is a notorious woman, is corrupt - after the first line's announcement, I want a hero, unusual desire seems to be a choice contrary to intuition. However, the imaginary Juan created by Byron is a victim of contingency of consecutive women, including his own mother, Donna Ines, not adventure and his aggressive promoter of women through poetry. Byron created by Juan is completely different from what we expected. Always young, innocent and 'good'

This research provides evidence of a developmental model of aesthetic judgment. It connects aesthetic experience to developmental theory and recognizes the impact of general environmental stimulation and special continuous education of art on the evolution of aesthetic understanding. Adult subjects can be divided into five levels of expertise in visual art. They judged copies of three pictures based on quality and interest, and wrote the reasons in their comments. The average stage scores of the various expert teams support the existing two development stage models of aesthetic understanding (Housen 1984, Parsons 1987). There is evidence that two variables affect the developmental level: the actual age and the amount of specific training in the field. These data show that the specific experience and training of the art has a strong overall impact on aesthetic judgment. This finding supports the theoretical distinction between universal developmental change and non-universal developmental change. In addition, the results indicate a possible field of aesthetic development theory and a possible field of sophistication. A more specific knowledge of the expert beginner's trajectory will accompany us to promote growth from the former to the latter. II. The aesthetic judgment of aesthetic judgment is not to combine reason and desire but to treat them as inseparable from the beginning. Aesthetic judgment is not an exercise in moral judgment, but it includes evaluation of concepts, and these concepts constitute the reasons for behavior in certain situations involving moral judgment. An important hypothesis of meaning and knowledge by many pragmatists is that our concept is not neutral. They embed more than descriptive information in them. In addition to descriptive content, there are also contents that determine the attitude and direction of the described object. This is the content that constitutes the evaluation element. This thesis is studying "four moments" of Kant's aesthetic judgment Aesthetic judgment is made by those who remain fair and who are not interested in the subject of the trial. Please consider all aesthetic judgments "universal". In other words, if an aesthetic judgment is made, everyone will agree. All aesthetic judgments are deliberate, but there is no end and all aesthetic judgment is necessary. Then, it will look at the two types of sublimation and continue discussing sublimation - mathematics and dynamics; its mathematical scope looks from where it is safe to overcome the existence of dynamics with us. . Since his aesthetic theory has since been seen among a number of influential and critical art philosophers it is clear that Kant affected many aesthetic philosophers who followed him. Kant began analysis of sublimation (criticism of aesthetic judgment II) from similarity of beauty and sublimation. The first thing that can be seen is obvious - both are aesthetic judgments. Both are accompanied by selfless happiness; when making an aesthetic judgment judge that things must be fair and at the same time judge whether things are clean; sublimacy - in case of dynamic sublimation People know that they will not hurt when passing through a storm from a safe distance, they can see a absolute impact of the storm and have a sublime experience. Both beauty and sublimation have universal aspects on them - the power of the storm and the influence from far away should give the same effect to everyone. However, we can judge that the third "moment" - "purpose" is not the same as the two aesthetics.

Realism is an international theory that expresses interest in international politics. The fundamental reason for understanding realism is that many realists have retrospective exhibitions at civil war scholars. Realists are most interested in exploring and understanding more about realism. War problems In addition, realism leads the American leaders to think more about the benefits of achieving peace. Many facts of realists are to increase the interests of the state. I believe the state is the basic role of international politics. Mainstream international relations theories are "realism" and "freedom institutionism". Realists believe that the state is in a disorder of world politics and that each country pays attention to their national interests. The concept known as "security dilemma" arises from the view that all countries are potential enemies and strengthening the security of a country leads to a relative loss of security in all other countries I will. Realists measure power based on material capabilities such as military expenses and natural resources. Realism believes that peace can last only through equilibrium of power between several countries, not the world of bipolar hegemony. Kenneth Waltz best summarizes the basic elements of realism. Although the degree is varied, mainstream international relations theory including realism, liberalism, constructivism, has privileged hegemony and socialization in the construction of international order. The theory of non hegemian international order believes that the international order is not only a function of power and the preference of hegemon (or power). A non-hegemonic international order can be defined as a relatively stable model of interaction between groups of countries, without personal or collective hegemony of the great powers. "British school" of international relations, also known as international society, liberal realism, rationalism or UK institutionalists, still has a "domestic society" at the international level despite the "disorderly" situation (Literally) lack of ruler or the world of the world) As Martin White did in the lectures of the London School of Economics in the 1950s, the extensive research of the British School was a reflection of the past international theoretical tradition Includes consideration. Hobbes (after Thomas) Hobbes), 2) Rationalists (or after Grotten, Hugo Grotius) 3) Revolutionists (or Kant, after Emanuel Kant). Roughly speaking, the UK school itself supports rationalist or Groatian traditions and is seeking an intermediate route (or through the media) between realistic "power politics" and revolutionary "utopianism" I will.

This is the basic principle of dialogue, the meaning of what is said and said what is done is based on its similarity, especially with other things. There is. This means that, regardless of whether the actor is consciously doing it or not, it is actually said to be "selected" for all practical purposes. Any choice made (or thought to be done) by someone reveals his or her thoughts - his or her intentions and desires, values ​​and influences - as a personality and quality of social existence. Or replace one of the alternatives. Human speech and behavior clarify human thoughts and constitute man's self-manifestation as a social being. This expression form is "personality", "face" in the meaning of Goffman. Because this representation format is generated by dialogue, actors' conversations and actions inevitably create their own performance regardless of whether they are intended or not. Therefore, it is not desirable for people with this ability to create self expression like children or adults. As long as these statements are due to personal personal interests, they have the right to ensure that they have this capability. Conversely, people with this ability can expect to have statements that go against their own interests due to accidents and inadequate performance. This is another aspect of the actor's self-expression and can be said to be related to its ability, regardless of whether the expression is intentional or beyond creative or clever . Here I studied two cases to explain the important proposition: (a) whether it is intentional, it creates a representation of one's own, and (b) it matches the profit of the actor himself / herself Evidence that seems deliberate, her ability, and (c) seems to be unintentional because they do not meet the interests of the actors themselves, this is evidence of failure, more widely evidence of defects. The first case was two young children who had to reconsider the expressiveness and interactivity of the children in that age because the conversation and action interactively produced self expression that matched their respective interests. The second is a doctor in the city clinic, his self expression is not his own concern. Robert Howell is Associate Professor of Philosophy at the State University of New York at Albany. I also taught (as a visitor) at Stanford University, Irinius University in Urbana, and Johns Hopkins University. In addition to the logic and ontology of the novel, Howell also researched similar problems arising from graphical expressions. In addition, he published a book on Kant, and he completed a book on the transcendental interpretation of the Kant 's category. Albany University is a comprehensive public research university offering over 120 undergraduate departments and minors, and 125 master's, doctoral and postgraduate certificate programs. UAlbany is the leader of all universities and universities in New York State and has a wide range of fields in the fields of air and environmental science, business, criminal justice, emergency situations, engineering and applied science, information science, administration, social welfare and sociology I have a teacher. Team experts We also offer academic and research opportunities for students through collaboration with Albany Law School of Law. ULaban started a wonderful career at 600 overseas study abroad opportunities.

The job of John Stuart Mill is seen as a way to support individuals and liberalism. The free work of the mill promotes individuality and positive progress for society and brings benefits to everyone. Individualism is considered necessary to have a progressive society that accepts other ideas and lifestyles. People think that opinions of others are necessary to society, and think that "not just relying on the truth". From his utilitarian point of view, Mill wrote that this view is taking the most likely action to help most people, and this view is not society actually doing The writing by John Stuart Mill and Emmanuel Kant shows a very different perspective on moral issues. Mill's idea is called Utilitarianism. In this ideology it is a fundamental belief that happiness is the greatest goal and action should be judged by the ability to provide maximum happiness to most people. The dentist Kant believes that this is not the result of action, but the behavior itself. He insists on reasonable moral rules John Rock and John Stuart Mill's Freedom Definition John Rock thinks that humans should have more freedom in political society than John Stuart Mir. John Rock's 'Second Paper of Government' and 'Freedom of Expression' by John Stuart Mill outlines the conceptual framework of each thinker's ideal country, but influential and powerful literary works Two different views on human nature and its freedom are proposed. About how John Locke and John Stuart Mill take different views John Stuart Mill was born on 13 Rodney Street in Penningville, Middlesex, is a historian and eldest son of economists James Mill and Harriet Burrow. John Stuart received advice and support from Jeremy Bentham and Francis Place under his father's education. He received a very strict education and had intentionally kept in touch with other children other than brothers and sisters. Clear goal is to create a genius of wisdom, which is a clear goal to inherit the causes and practices of his father, Bentham's followers and followers of Bentham's death utilitarianism. 1) Introduction: The main task in Mill's rights is On Liberty. It was published in England in 1859. John Stuart Mill is a student of his father James Mill and Jeremy Bentham who proposed to keep his theory of utilitariy. John Stuart Mill is a genius of children, a genius in history. He began reading Greek at the age of 3 and began to read Latin at the age of 8.

Christian Christian Concept Christian argues that the concept of their God is found in the Bible. Known as classical theology, this view of God has always been regarded as the orthodox position of the Western world. For our present purpose, we can examine a lot of divine attributes, but classical theology is at least (1) personal and intangible (there is no important part), And (2) existence of all creators and maintainers. Other, (3) totipotency (omnipotent), (4) totipotency (omniscient), (5) totipotency (everywhere), (6) immutable (no change) and eternal (7) necessary and only God. To God, Emmanuel Kant, Christian Christianity concepts mainly in Western religion, human status will be higher when it becomes a moral problem. However, this is a question for the work the philosopher has done on this subject. Every philosopher in front of him also tried to solve and define this magical thing called moral good. For Kant, this trip has further benefits. He discovered that being a person, not a god himself, is more impressive. To people, doing the right things and moral things means making decisions, standing among the duality of each person, being moral, or obeying the propensity of animal tendencies. This trend is primarily for happiness At the heart of the writing of Western Christian is the specific concept of God: monotheism, anthropomorphism, the main motive of the universe and the god as the creator, God, who can be human involved by direct intervention in human relations Please pursue your own goals and motivation. This concept of God violates scientific evidence, daily experience, and human dignity. It should be revealed and riddled repeatedly, whether it is an atheist or a rationalist. But these people did not attack God. They just attack a certain concept of God: Western concept, it is a particularly soft target. But another understanding of God is not easily attacked by rationalism. In this understanding, God is not a general mobilizer and is not a self-conscious person with a plan and purpose. There is no definite agreement on the nature and existence of God. The concept of the god of Abraham contains the monotheistic definition of God in Judaism, the Trinity of Christianity, and the concept of God of Islam. Dharma religion differs in their perception of divinity: God's view in Hindu changes from region to church, sect and caste, from monotheism to polytheism. Its name is not "god", but many polytheistic beliefs have the idea of ​​creating God, and that is not a single god all other personality is attributed to monotheism religion. Jainism is a polytheist and not a creator. According to my interpretation and tradition, Buddhism can be considered as atheistic, non-theological, pantheistic, singular, or polytheistic.

The importance of educational experience was always the subject of philosophical debate. These discussions between empiricists and rationalists have been on for a while. Rationalists believe that the knowledge gained through sensation can not be trusted, learning can only be accomplished through reasoning. On the other hand, experientists believe that knowledge can be obtained through empirical impressions and concepts that can not be learned without experience (Evans, 1992, p. 35). However, Kant solves this argument and believes that experience and reason are necessary conditions for learning. Empiricism and rationalism: Experiences are related to British enlightenment philosophers including John Rock, George Berkeley, Hume. Experiences believe that all human knowledge comes from sensory and sensory experiences. According to New Orleans of the University of Loyola, a rationalist who lives mainly on the European continent believes that the sensation is not reliable, and that knowledge is brought about through thought, or ideas and intuitional thought. John Comenius (1592 - 1670) is an excellent intellectual who supports universal education and practical education. He played an important role in introducing picture books written in their own languages, not Latin. He advocates development of lifelong learning and logical thinking, not memorization. He wants to educate women and poor children John Rock (1632-1704) was the first person in the classic English classics. These philosophers are skeptical of rationalistic metaphysics, in particular abuse of speculation, epistemology based on congenital concepts. Explain all natural knowledge of human knowledge without reference, and his theory is simpler and better than Descartes' theory. - To live in society based on the social contract we signed, the government and artificial law is definitely a strong defender of the treaty itself. They will benefit the citizens and protect the country's safety. Nonetheless, they should not be the only reasons for justice, it should not be a precondition for justice. In Kant 's epistemology the two conflicting camps were rationalists and empiricists. Rationalists led by Rene Descartes believe in a priori reasoning. Thinking of a series of assumptions, what can you infer? On the other hand, Hume and the empiricist. Camp learns from experience or prioritize reasoning after reasoning. So far, the neural network was empirical. Let's see a lot of data and draw conclusions from there. There are more theories behind other machine learning methods, but they still tend to be based on empiricism. Without data, they are nothing. Professor Pedro Domingos of the University of Washington changed the analogy of machine learning to a scientific method. Hypothesize and collect some data. Optimize assumptions and repeat

The opposite redemption to humanity and federalism documents provides valuable insight into the human government's and human spirit. In fact, the Federalists repeatedly admitted the basic truth of the existence of human beings. Humans are born with traits that are selfish, hostile and are hindering peaceful and harmonious existence. As history has repeatedly shown, human corruption has penetrated even the most powerful government. Ironically, the government needs to take precautionary measures to protect themselves. Even from your own members, to protect everything the government has to improve: shortcomings of human nature. Proairesis, the ability to choose, a person is easy to draw conclusions, but a pioneer of will. Without such a space, it will be handed over to two contradictory forces: on the other hand, the self-evident truth power, we can not agree with or disagree with freedom. On the other hand, the power of passion and desire, in this case nature overwhelms us unless we reasonably "force" and let us leave. It is Kant that these worlds are really irrelevant to our background. His will is not a special psychological ability different from thought, but it is a practical reason, a different kind of practice from Aristotle. (Free arbitration) It is not a reason for itself; for Kant, pure spontaneity he usually calls "absolute spontaneity" exists only in thinking. Kant's widow was appointed to act as an enforcement body for all action matters. Let's start with the fundamental law of humanity. If I have to say what the basic law of humanity is, the basic law of humanity denies that we have human nature and we are controlled by these powers It is to deny it. I believe that "I am not irrational, not aggressive, I do not think it's embarrassing, I am not a narcissist." "Always on the other side, they are Republicans, Spartans, Ethiopians - they are irrational and aggressive people." I? No, "So, I want to get rid of this annoying habit deeply rooted in us is. Thomas Hobbes and John Rock have two opposite views on humanity. Locke believes that human nature is natural; Hobbes believes that human nature knows good and evil, but nature is evil and no one is completely "good" . Nathaniel Hawthorne, author of the classic novel "Red Letter", believes that everyone is born as a kind person. Nathaniel Hawthorne depicts the powerful values ​​of Puritan in the 17th century. The century passed through urban residents and women. Religion is the life style of Puritan. Their values ​​are reflected in their emotions, attitudes, actions and words. Hester Prine committed adultery, which contradicted Puritan's belief. By examining the punishment given to Hester, Hawthorne can continue to emphasize Puritans

Let's say John Doe has a bulldog that he does not train well. One day, John's dog jumped over the fence and handed over to Jane Smith's dog, Fifi. Jane hurried to the vet to Fifi and sent a $ 2,000 veterinary bill. Jane sued John Doe for $ 3,000 to compensate for the veterinarian's invoice and pain. The judge agreed and ordered John to pay $ 3,000. This order is a judgment against John, usually a question of public records. If John does not decide, Jane can request relief from the court. This may involve the court leaving statutory liens on assets and subsidizing salary or other acts. There are all kinds of judgment. For example, if the defendant does not appear in the court to defend himself or does not respond to the subpoena, the default sentence is beneficial to the plaintiff. If the sale of the forfeited property does not produce enough cash to pay the judgment and the court must retain the statutory lien for more property, a flaw judgment will result. The judgment is reported to the credit institution, and usually personal credit reports are kept as negative items for seven years. However, judgment is not necessarily money. For example, a judge can command John to build a high fence above his property, or take away the dog. Note: According to Article 54 of the Federal Civil Procedure Code, the judgment includes orders and orders that are the basis for the appeal. : A petition for moving defendants' motion, the petition can be rejected in the subject judgment, the judgment judgment is canceled according to the judgment, the judgment is supported. Note: In federal judgment the judgment has been replaced by a legal judgment, but the judgment still exists. : The judgment of the defendant against one or more offenses if the defendant's petition at the end of the evidence or judgment based on the court's own pleadings and the evidence is insufficient to maintain confidence. : A judgment is given to a defendant who did not respond effectively (because the answer was withdrawn or did not respond to plaintiff's case) : A judgment that can be made on a petition of a party if there is virtually no material de facto problem in a complaint, discovery or other affidavit and the party has the right to determine its merit as a legal matter Note: According to Article 56 of the Federal Civil Procedure Code, summary judgment can be done in whole or in part. c: Convictions of criminal defendants by the court and imposed penalties 2: Judgment acts: psychological or intellectual processes that form opinions or make decisions Decisions made by individuals or organizations (as Board of Directors) authorized to act on behalf of the company (H) Maintain multiple claims or judgment for multiple parties. If the court makes a final judgment pursuant to the conditions provided for in Rule 54 (B), the court may continue to execute the judgment before submitting a subsequent judgment or judgment and determine the conditions necessary to secure the profit . A party that promotes a judgment. (A) Physical disability and unavailability after trial or hearing. If there is a judge supervising the project or proceedings of the evidence, he / she shall hear the petition and make all the decisions and judgments required by the court in connection with evidence and judicial or hearing. After a trial or hearing What is the taste judgment? Kant judges two basic requirements, subjectivity and universality in judgment (Kant 1790). Other conditions will also help to judge the taste, but they are the result or foundation of the two basic conditions. In this respect, Kant follows the guidance of other writers in the sentimental traditions of Hume and Britain (Hume 1757). The first necessary condition to judge the taste is that it is inherently subjective. This means that the taste judgment is based on emotions of joy or misfortune. This distinguishes taste judgment from empirical judgment. The central example of taste judgme

How much salvation is offered abroad is morally obligatory. This is a good thing, but many people say that there is no obligation to provide something. Some people say that if a person's needs outweigh their needs, he should donate some of what he has. However, Peter Singer did a completely different perspective. His paper "Famine, Prosperity and Morality" focuses on the crisis of Bangladesh in 1971, arguing that people have an obligation to give as much moral as possible. His thesis supports "the idea that we should give it until we reach the level of marginal utility - by giving more than that, I or the same as my family suffer as much pain Will result. Moral philosophy is a concept designed to provide answers to human moral problems. In order to achieve this goal, human actors need to recognize and recruit moral obligations and moral obligations. In his attitude towards human morality, Kant emphasizes basic human morality and moral responsibility based on the results of his famous 'moral metaphysical foundation' work. Therefore, from this platform, the answer given by moral and psychological science clearly shows that morality determines the determinism and behavior of human subjects and also affects human socialization. Therefore, Kant's attitude towards human morality is trying to explain these concepts (Johnson, 2008). In his first moral philosophy, "foundation of moral metaphysics", Kant can provide us a way to determine the moral controversy to provide us with a common moral instinct to us I tried to systematize it. Do not ask various questions or clarify. According to common understanding, he pointed out that the only unconditional good thing in the world is goodwill. Well-known good fortune, health, and even happiness are not unconditionally good. When they marry the bad guys they will be the source of condemnation for fair observers. We will not admire the evil man who achieved his goals and enjoyed the sunset victory. We condemn him and I hope his plan will be dissatisfied. No, it is more important than happiness, with happiness, that is worth having goodwill.

Kant's large and intensive philosophy gathering has a perfect moral norm for people to follow. As one of the last traditional philosophers, Kant built his wonderful philosophical system from the beginning, especially the morals applicable to people. Kant's absolute command is merely a part of his moral law applicable to all circumstances, directing absolute authority. Kant explained his code of ethics in various ways. First, he seems that your code of conduct is a universal law of nature, and the manner of action makes people never use himself or someone else as a means, but always ends at the same time Said. Just like Sisyphus pushing it up and letting you scroll down again, I still write that low or zero statistics and refuse to be cursed. Let go of your own burden - yourself - the comfort of writing is more than the sorrow of somewhat or not reading at all What I learned recently is incredibly important to put the glass down. In other words, you let go of your burden. You can do it anymore! Please do not bring me till late in the evening or late at night. Do not carry them on the next day, week, month, or lifetime. No! Instead, choose to drop the glass. I will release your burden. Please remind you the truth about who you are. Let me tell you that you are truly a spark of love and light and are born in a world that needs your existence. You will not be alone. I will touch your deepest injuries and release you from judgment and fear. I associate you with the flow of consciousness transcending pain, you make you more open and fall in love with unconditional people. " If you suffer from a heavy burden and try enough to enter heaven, let me invite you to reduce this burden today. This is a burden you can not afford. Believe in Jesus. My heart is calm and humble, so you have to find peace yourself. My yoke is easy, so my burden is very light. "(Matthew 11: 28-30) Let go of your deadly life and pick up your cross. That yoke is easy and the burden is very light. He is your heart and will never let you down. I cited your faith as a gift and believed without doubt that he was the Son of God, brought to the ground, born of a virgin, released to serve the world, died on the cross by ugly death. His blood is still the power of your illness healing and the power of prisoners of warfare, under his name he finds a lost man and seeks everlasting life in him. This is an eternal and eternal state. Certainly, heaven will come even on the ground, so you can gain complete stability.

The advantage of being a habit is to study the following questions. Does it take the definition of virtue Aristotle's ordinary or Emmanuel Kant's revisionist as a moral habit, does it affect moral psychology? The opposition to these definitions assumes that their moral theories are made a priori later and hence it is assumed that they can not be critically compared initially because they are uncommunicable. The two comparability points and the reasons for comparative evaluation are two fundamental problems which the theory of moral psychology must solve. Summary: Next, I will study the next question. Is it possible in moral psychology to use Aristotle's ordinary or Cant's revisionist virtue definition as a habit? Kant refuted the means as the definition of Aristotle's virtue and ignorant moral issues (I do not know what to do) and weaknesses (I do not do what I know), comparability and Offered criticism. Sex comparison point. I ought to do this. These two issues are the basic themes of moral psychology. I have shown two things. First, Kant's definition is revisionism. Because he excludes the formation of moral habits included in Aristotle, ie (i) the careful calculation of the average, and (ii) the formation of habits by repeating. This is because Kant argues that only moral subjects are willing to act freely and universally, and argues that behavior is moral. The advantage of being a habit is to study the following questions. Does it take the definition of virtue Aristotle's ordinary or Emmanuel Kant's revisionist as a moral habit, does it affect moral psychology? The opposition to these definitions assumes that their moral theories are made a priori later and hence it is assumed that they can not be critically compared initially because they are uncommunicable. The two comparable points and the reason for comparative assessment ... By improving personal health habits, several lung diseases, injuries, and HIV / AIDS can usually be prevented. Proper diet, exercise, and smoking cessation are examples of good habits that help maintain health. ] (What can you do to maintain health, paragraph 1). If you can not take proper nutrients for your body you will face the risk of problems due to unhealthy eating habits and lack of exercise

From 1798, esthetics from Germany, aesthetic from France, esthetic from France, (from feeling or thought) from 'sensitive and sensitive' from Greek aiththetikos, emotions from PIE *, from *, - from consciousness "(See audience) It was promoted in English by the translation of Immanuel Kant and was originally used in the correct meaning of the science of dealing with sensory perception conditions. After Alexandre Baumgarten declared "taste criticism" in German (1750s), Kant tried to correct that word, but Baumgarten's consciousness began to spread in English. And removed the words from philosophical grounds. Walter Pate used it (1868) described the end of 19c. The move to promote "art for art" further blurs this feeling. As an adjective of 1803. Related: Aesthetics The term aesthetics is also aesthetic, so please do not confuse both ways. This is a word that explains someone's idea of ​​what is beautiful. Modern aesthetics or classical aesthetics If you like the way something comes up you think you have an aesthetic appearance. If you want to think about what makes beautiful art, you are interested in aesthetic philosophy. Aesthetics is a very exciting occupation. You can feel better about yourself by looking at other people. If you are interested in helping others see the best, this is your career. At Evergreen Beauty School, beauty training is offered at three major campuses. Getting started is very easy, just contact us and we will guide you through the application process Before enrolling in online aesthetic school you need to check whether the beauty school is approved by the National Beauty Council. We can not train from school unless the online beauty school is accredited by the state's beauty committee. Also check your state licensing practices and choose the best beauty school with a good reputation in your state. Before you decide to enter the online beauty school, you just have to visit the school instead of relying on that website. This will help you to understand the facilities and courses the school offers and to determine if it is your best option. My research paper is based on my research on the occupation of aesthetics and aesthetics industry. The prospects of hairdressers and skin care professionals are very good. According to the US Bureau of Labor Statistics forecasts of esthetician employment prospects for 2014 are expected to grow at the same rate as all occupational averages. Both the veterans and the newly licensed estheticians have different opportunities for work. The salon and spa are the best places to start as estheticians. Of course there are dermatology departments and other medical facilities where estheticians can work. Needless to say, you can do business on your own, offer aesthetic and skin individually ... Show more content

(A) Descartes' first meditation is sometimes called doubt and attempts to abandon everything he knows about reality and existence. People may want to know the meaning of adopting this skeptical mindset, but it only leads to a lot of confusion and some kind of embarrassment. But it is fair to carefully consider the arguments before criticizing it. Therefore, it is intended to weaken what kind of information, and it explains Descartes's "devil" thinking experiment about how it accomplishes all his knowledge, opinions, and beliefs as a mistaken task To do. French philosopher René Descartes was known for his motto in the 16th century. "So, I think so." He believes that animals have no consciousness, no thought and no pain. According to Descartes, they are "automatic machines" and are simply complex machines. In fact, his view was later used to prove the practice of animals' living solutions for centuries. Even Kant believes that human rational autonomy will make them superior. Infants, Alzheimer's disease patients, developmental disorders, etc. may be considered to lack reasonable autonomy. In any case, personality is not a standard of definition that is regarded as an object of ethical consideration. In my opinion, the problem to consider is whether Kant is just a speciesist, as the singer criticizes. Descartes suggested that all our experiences are merely an ongoing dream. That means that everything we know and understand as "real" is fake. In this article, first of all, Descartes attempts to deny the concept of knowledge through this thought experiment. Secondly, I will show how he answers the questions raised through his assumption. Finally, I will explain how the movie "Matrix" helps people recognize the relevance of Descartes thought experiments. Descartes realized that he had to destroy all the experiments he had with the suspected boy who entered him to take this idea seriously. If I doubt what he is thinking, how can he take his idea seriously? He did this by locking himself to achieve his own idea. After he was over, he started meditation. He started discussing with a strange thought; dreaming and what is this? He first saw things around him

In our country, regardless of strikes, conferences, parades, we observe non-violent protest action every day. Many of these demonstrations were found to be effective and respected over time. However, civil conflict and non-violent philosophy seem like widely accepted concepts today, but many of the people who fight such negotiations are considered extremists who bring them to society I will. Among these transcendents, Mr. Henry David Thoreau who wrote "civil disobedience", Mohandas Gandhi who wrote "Satya Graha", and Martin Luther gold who wrote "Birmingham Prison Letters" Although the philosophical concept was developed by Plato, Henry David Thoreau and transcendental transit began as a movement of extreme religious movement against the conservative system. Historically, according to Peter Carafiol's transcendence, "It was intellectual property born from Kant and mediated by Romanticism between England and Germany." Prior to that, it was a monotheistic relationship. As Kalafior said, protests and dissatisfaction with Protestantism and Catholicism. Transcendentalism is a philosophical movement developed in the eastern United States from the late 1820s to the 1830s. It resulted from reactions at the time to protest general intellectuals and spiritual conditions. The monotheistic church doctrine taught by Harvard Seminary is particularly interesting. Transcendence is based on the philosophy of transcendental theory derived from the idealism of Emmanuel Kant and German romantism, "Romanticism of England and Germany, John Gottfried Herder and Friedrich Schliermach's biblical criticism, David Humu's skepticism" . Miller and Versluis believe that Emanuel Swedenborg has a universal influence on transcendentalism. It is also strongly influenced by spiritual and spiritual philosophy, in particular Hindu texts on Upanishad. The modern transcendental philosophy was developed by a German philosopher Harald Holtz in a holistic approach. Holz freed the transcendence from the fusion of the new cantanism and critically discussed the transcendental pragmatism and the transcendental philosophy, the relationship between the new empiricism and the so-called postmodern. In everyday languages, "transcend" means "transcendence", "self transcendism" means transcending the form or state before you. This mysterious experience is considered to be a state of transcendental self transcendence, in particular, self recognition is abandoned there. "Self transcending" is psychologically measurable, considered (at least in part) genetic, and has been included in the temperament and personality list as a dimension of personality. Dean Hamer explains this finding in "The God Gene", which is criticized by critics like Carl Zimmer.

Most people believe that the death penalty is the deterrent of murder, because these people do not see it when they apply. According to retalians like Kant and Van den Hague, criminals should be punished. On the other hand, those who oppose the death penalty like Bedo think that the death penalty is as effective as life imprisonment. The most famous retributive Kant stated that criminals should be punished for choosing the wrong action and respect them as moral actors by punishing them. The death penalty, also known as the death penalty, is the most severe punishment imposed in the United States today. According to the Online Webster Dictionary, the death penalty is defined as "a judicial order to force a deceased as a punishment for a serious crime, often called a death penalty or death" (1). In jurisdictions subject to capital punishment, its use is usually limited to a few criminal offenses. The death penalty is also defined as the death penalty, which is also known as the death penalty or death penalty ("capital punishment"), that the state executed a convicted criminal. Since the beginning of our history, official executions of individuals in violation of public rules have been carried out. Even if there is no formal law, implementation is always part of the community judicial system. It is used to regulate the behavior of community members The death penalty, also known as the death penalty, was enforced by a criminal who was sentenced to death to be convicted in the criminal court. The capital punishment should be distinguished from extrajudicial executions without proper legal proceedings. Although the term death penalty may be used interchangeably with the death penalty, execution of the death penalty is not always executed as the commuter may become a life imprisonment (even if the original sentence is Even if appealed). Also known as the death penalty or the death penalty is state penalties due to penalties for the death penalty. These crimes are called death or death. Death penalty was imposed in many societies, the death penalty was imposed in 58 countries now, the death penalty has been abolished in 97 countries. In the past, the ruling party informed criminals of the entire community of his or her criminal activity. Therefore, if the community is aware of the outcome of the law violation, the crime rate will decline. Such criminal penalties include the following: boil, death, destruction, crucifixion, etc. until death. As time passed, people came to adopt more human treatment. Watch more content

With the help of his dear friend Friedrich Engels, Karl Marx created the theory of socialism and communism we know today. Marx lived in the 19th century, which was an era of confusion, while poor people were getting poor, a small number of US industrialists accumulated a great deal of wealth. Marx began to explain obvious contradictions: How many poor people can be in such wealthy society? The Communist Party Declaration co-authored by Carl Marx in 1848 is welcomed as one of the most influential political documents in the world. The publication of the book gained the reputation of famous sociologists and political theorists in Marx. Karl Heinrich Marx is one of nine children born in Heinrich and Henrietta Marx in Prussia Trier. His father was a successful lawyer who respected Kant and Voltaire and was a passionate activist to Prussian reform. Both parents are Jews and Jews, but Karl 's father was 35 when he converted to Christianity in 1816. This may be a professional concession to the law which prohibited Jews from entering the upper class in 1815. It was the main belief of Trier that he accepted the Lutheran church rather than a Catholic, "Identify Protestant and Intellectual Freedom". After her father died, I waited until 1825 Karl Heinrich Marx was born on 5 May 1818 in Trier of Line Prussia. He is a lawyer at Heinrich Marx, a lawyer, and Henriette Presburg Marx. His parents were descendants of the Jews but his father chose to become a Protestant and was baptized before August 1817 to continue his work in Prussia. "Karl was baptized at the same church at the age of 6 in 1824." http://search.biography.com/print_record.pl?id=6048. Kid's childhood is a happy and easygoing childhood. His parents have a good relationship to help Karl move in the right direction. His parents have four children, Carl is the oldest child. Karl Heinrich is one of the nine children of the Heinrich and Henrietta Marx family. Marx's father is a lawyer with a relatively progressive view, reading Kant and Voltaire and advocating reform of the Prussian state. This family is quite prosperous. Marx has never experienced poverty or poverty in his childhood and adolescence. Both parents were Jews, but in 1816 the father of Carl converted to Christianity at the age of 35. This may be an objection to the law prohibiting Jews from entering the upper class in 1815. Importantly, most of Trier's people are Roman Catholics, but he chose Lutheran faith, so that "identifying Protestantism as intellectual freedom". However, Heinrich · Marx is far from revolution. If he notices him, he will definitely get a shock. The future trajectory of his beloved son Carl

The commitment to keeping the contract was always the subject of Genesis and departure. The contract is an agreement between the parties and is not intended to be broken. On some occasions God has signed up with several people to bless them. In return, they love him, serve him, and obey him as their only true god. The first big deal God created was Noah. In Noah's time, the world became a safe haven in many ways. The heart of God saddened by the sins of the world, decided to extinguish human beings from the earth. X. There is no obligation to God to promise that natural people will leave hell anytime. God has not made promises about eternal life and salvation and salvation from everlasting death, but what is included in the covenant of grace, the promise given to Christ are all of you and the apostles It is inside. But they are not at all interested in accepting promises of promises that are not contracts, they do not believe in the commitments of the contracts, they are not interested in contracting contracts. If violation of conservative traditional pledge is the principle, no one will think you will keep your promise. When formulating your personal maxims, you need to keep your own promise universally (except for your own circumstances); when you develop a universal law you are universal It must be argued that it is. This personal maxim does not pass the Cl test as it causes logical contradiction. By following this procedure, each of us can create our own moral responsibility and we will not make false promises. In the second statement of Cl, Kant told us "act on behalf of you as treating humans as ... not just as a means but as an end." This statement shows that we know limited intrinsic value. Because of this value, we can not be used alone to help us achieve our objectives; everyone is a self-terminator. Kant believes that this rule is the same as the first formula to generate the same rule set.

In the movie "Pursuit of Happiness", Will Smith talks about how Thomas Jefferson used the word "seeking" in the "Declaration of Independence". "...... I can pursue happiness, but I will never be happy," he continued. For diligence and dedication, you may experience some happiness. While trying to achieve happiness, most people have suffering and frustration; even the idea of ​​what constitutes happiness fluctuates from person to person. Individuals who have resolved can overcome very complicated problems and get enough happiness. The desire for happiness is not just love for music and desire for health. They are happily included. They are some of the elements that make up the desire for happiness. Happiness is not an abstract concept, it is a concrete whole, and these are a part of it. Utilitarian standards permit and approve their existence. Without the source of happiness, unless it is essentially unrelated but nature is not arranged like this, it will lead to satisfaction of our basic desire, or if it is relevant, it will be them Let's see. The source of your own happiness is more valuable than basic happiness - more permanent. . . And more intense We are anxious for happiness everyday. We have found happiness everywhere, and finally we said we can not find it. But do we really know what is happiness? No, it is not. Happiness is not the completion of a specific desire, it is the same for all of us as if it were a desire to be simply satisfied. Some people think that they want to get 50,000 mobile phones, but I think that I will be happy if I get a mobile phone, but another person may not get the same mobile phone at the same time. Therefore, the phone is not happy. The question arising from that is "What is happiness?" Desire for morality and happiness. Kant would say that the behavior of people acting "justly" for the desire for happiness and happiness is "without moral value." In fact, even if he acted properly because he aspires to others' happiness, Kant would say that this person's behavior is not moral. Why did he think so? How do you think epiculus will react to Kant? Evaluate what Kant and Epyclus say. Who do you agree with (if any), and why? What do you think is the right place for the desire for the motive of human moral behavior? (As regards this question, if you like, you can bring a mill.)

An important aspect of Leibniz 's "monism" and "metaphysical discourse" is the concept of his simplicity and interaction. Leibniz gives the word monad to all simple substances. A monad is part of a creature "whether it is stretched, not shaped, whether it can not be separated" (M3). A monad can exist as a clear, necessary, limited, or infinite presence. For Leibniz, God is the only necessary and infinite monad, he is an endless and unique guardian of the only certain, independent and restricted monads in the universe, and they all depend on God . It exists (D 14). In Physical Monography (1756), Kant tried to use "single" to provide a metaphysical description of the basic composition of matter. Leibniz and Wolff believe that the list is a simple atomic material constituting the substance. Kant rejected Leibniz 'remark that following Wolf, the list is spiritual and does not keep in touch with each other. A new aspect of Kant's assertion is that each list has some gravitational and repulsive forces and because these lists are compressed mutually by conflicting repulsive forces due to the interaction between these lists the order is determined To fill up the amount of space. Thirty years later, in Kant 's metaphysical foundation of natural science (1786), Kant will develop the theory that substances must be understood in terms of attractiveness and repulsion of interaction. An important aspect of Leibniz 's "monism" and "metaphysical discourse" is the concept of his simplicity and interaction. Leibniz gives the word monad to all simple substances. A monad is part of a creature "whether it is stretched, not shaped, whether it can not be separated" (M3). A monad can exist as a clear, necessary, limited, or infinite presence. - The main feature I am missing is confidence. In my opinion, others are always smarter, more beautiful, motivated, and superior to me than I am. Because of this attitude, I usually do not express opinions, express my thoughts, or control something. As Leibniz argues in Section 8 of metaphysical discourse, if a limited substance has a CIC, what is its ontological state? In other words, what kind of CIC can have such properties and such properties? Leibniz 's answer to this question emphasizes other entity paradigms, or unity. Having CIC is the essence of an individual substance, but only real true solidarity is qualified as a substance. Leibniz expressed his position with a letter to Arnauld in a very clear and powerful way. "In short, I emphasize this same proposition and insist only by becoming an axiom, it is not true that is not true" (G II 97 / AG 86) In the era of communication between metaphysics and Arnauld, Leibniz sought certain academic concepts, mainly the concept of physical form.

INTRODUCTION The medieval world represented by Thomas Aquinas firmly believes religious teachings and regards the "large chain of existence" as a concept that gives society an absolute structure. Bay Philosophy World c. The common difference between them is d. Becker's claim is me. Philosophers of the 18th century are more like today's human beings, the 13th century theologians. II. He insists that philosophers of the 18th century tried to deconstruct paradise cities of old religious order (possibly unconsciously) and to reconstruct it on the earth. Becker was known for his 18th century philosopher urban heaven (1932) and held four lectures on enlightenment at Yale University. He argues that the philosophy in the "rational time" is more dependent on Christian hypotheses than what they admit, and exerts influence, but it is particularly attacked greatly. In this part, I explain the interests of this book in part (p.47): In the 13th century, keywords will definitely be God, sin, grace, salvation, heaven and so on; in the 19th century , Facts, facts, evolutionary progress; in the 20th century relativity, process, coordination, function, complexity This entry discusses philosophical idealism as a movement in the 18th and 19th centuries, though it was predicted in several aspects of the philosophy of the 17th century. Epistemological idealism (the content of human knowledge inevitably determined by the structure of human thought) and ontological idealism (epistemological idealism conveys the truth, thought related to it)). In this article, after discussing the pioneers, the idealistic version of the 18th century by Berkeley, Hume, Kant, the German idealist movement of the 19th century, then the idealism of British and American, and then the idealism of later Focus on attacks. Summary Moore and Russell In the 18th century, many great philosophers discussed human rights. In addition to Jean Jacques Rousseau, which has had a great influence on the French Revolution, German philosopher Immanuel Kant believes that the most basic human rights are "freedom" - he believes that all other rights are in front of the law I said that it comes from equality wait. In support of such an ideal concept, a smart contract called "DAO - Local Government Organization" gathered about $ 160 million. But something went wrong and some funds were stolen by hackers. It is obvious that this problem is related to the application (track), not the block chain itself.

Analytical criticism of "Godfather" "Godfather" is such a wonderful movie because it allows the viewer to decide whether to prefer these characters. Too many movies about organized crime begin with seemingly random violence. However, "Godfather" is to know from the beginning that the characters in the movie will be judged from what kind of person they are judged based on the criminal acts they may be involved in make it possible. The movie starts with a wedding ceremony that decides the stage of the family that is the basic theme of the movie. In this article, we first outline a general explanation on Kant's aesthetics. This allows you to see the first part of his third critique - trial criticism. This leads to the four moments of aesthetic judgment described by Kant - "selfless desire", "universality", "purpose" and "necessity". Then this article discusses the concept of sublimation of Kant, see the main difference between beauty and sublimation and sublimation type. According to Kant, this leads to a relationship between sublimation and beauty and leads to a conclusion by studying some criticisms on Kant's aesthetic judgment. Analytical criticism of "Godfather" "Godfather" is such a wonderful movie because it allows the viewer to decide whether to prefer these characters. Too many movies about organized crime begin with seemingly random violence. However, "Godfather" is to know from the beginning that the characters in the movie will be judged from what kind of person they are judged based on the criminal acts they may be involved in make it possible. "The Internet is a communication tool for the world where people can talk about movies and gather to share pornographic content with each other" (Smith, Jay, Silent Bob Strike Back). Society uses the Internet as a means of expressing opinions on specific issues. The entertainment industry is often the focus of these online singers; fortunately, sometimes it does not look like that, but the Internet audience provides positive feedback.

"The human brain starts working from the moment you were born until you stand up and speak in public." - (George Jessier) People try to elucidate the brain and what is going on inside This is what the philosopher is trying to achieve today, but you can ask a question. Why do I have to dissect the brain? This problem occurs because the philosopher really wants to know what is happening in the human brain. This can also be traced back to "knowing" and believing what can be proved fact. The philosophy of Immanual Kant (1724-1804), the most influential philosopher since Aristotle, is an attempt to answer the skeptical philosophy of David Hume (1711-1776). According to Hume there is no reason to believe the causal relationship; for example, just because an object seems to have a law of gravity that always causes objects of the past to fall to the ground, the object will not change at such next gravity law There is no reason to believe it to follow. Kant agreed that Hume agreed that he could not understand how something behaves in the real world or the real world. But Kant adds new wrinkles. He thinks that each person's mind builds up a subjective world and that this subjective world is the world that each of us "knows". The opposite of causal reductionism and causal skepticism is a new tradition of rest. It began with Norman Kemp Smith's "David Hume's Philosophy" and defended Hume as a causal realist's viewpoint. In this way we deny the causality reduction theory and causality skepticism. - Causal relationships are known in principle. (Tooley 1987: 246-47) Considering the above explanation, Humean's causal realism is least intuitive, so it needs the most explanation. However, this position can be made more reasonable by introducing three explanatory tools that seem to require proper use to persuade the realistic interpretation. Two of them argue that Hume is respected in important respects, but it is a description of a realist who claims that unrealistic interpretation is often denied.

In this article we will examine philosophical issues raised in the movie 'Matrix'. It gradually introduces how film problems are directly related to skepticism and physical and mental problems and furthermore how these problems resemble the concepts proposed by Descartes and Plato's philosophy I will explain. That is because many of the questions posed in the movies are a metaphor of the concepts in the work of each philosopher and why these concepts are important to the way they are presented in the movie Let's see. Please refer to Aristotle and Aristotleism, René Descartes and Descartesism, Epicurean and Epicureanism, Religiousism about biographies of the main philosopher of the West and related movement. Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel and Hegelianism, Immanuel Kant and Kantism, Karl Marx and Marxism, Plato and Platonism, Pythagoras and Pythagoreanism. To cover a specific field of Western philosophy, see Aesthetics, Epistemology, Ethics, Thought, Logic, Metaphysics, Biological Philosophy, Educational Philosophy, History Philosophy, Legal Philosophy, Mathematics Philosophy, Mathematics Philosophy. Philosophy Philosophy, Religious Philosophy, Science Philosophy In this article we will examine philosophical issues raised in the movie 'Matrix'. It gradually introduces how film problems are directly related to skepticism and physical and mental problems and furthermore how these problems resemble the concepts proposed by Descartes and Plato's philosophy I will explain. - During the Victorian period, poets were motivated to discuss each other in the fervor of enlightenment. Romanticism and Victorian literature were initially a problem to be accepted. As a Victorian poet, Gerald Manley Hopkins attacks religious ideas by doubting the existence of God. Hopkins' sonnet reflects this problem of oppressive religion through his gorgeous poetry for educating people about the conspiracy of the changing era

Lying is a moral decision to deceive yourself. Telling a lie may be one of the most common cheatings we do (the researcher says "lies are an inevitable part of human nature") BBC Religion & Ethics This is a general behavior, but it will still make people crazy. Why are we lying? How do you see a lying person? Why is it so difficult to tell the truth? Lying does not necessarily imply moral deterioration. In fact, this action involves a lot of creativity, spiritual agility, and perseverance. Http: //wwwpeople.howstuffworks.com When you were young, there was a course hit hard: "To be honest, everything will work. Lying is not a sign of moral collapse. It is a "psychological behavior or process that acquires knowledge and understanding through sensory, experienced, and cognitive progress." Https://enwikepedia.org It is often difficult to estimate the outcome of their actions or to underestimate or ignore the harmful consequences of their lies to society (distrust of fraud). As confidence declined, cynicism expanded and our overall quality of life declined; pursuit of greater common interest led to "slump". The statement of moral bankruptcy is as follows. "I stole it to a charity" Lies often assume "my life". Unintentional or expected results are likely to occur. Critics insist that lying is morally wrong, as we can not measure the benefits and harms of lies. Greenberg, Michael A. "The consequence of the truth." JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association 266 (1991): 66 Philosopher Immanuel Kant (1724-22) is the central figure of modern philosophy, stating that lying is always morally wrong. It comes from the fact that human beings are the subject of their own rationality, freely making their own decisions, setting their own goals, and leading them through rationality. To become a behavioral person is to have a reasonable power of free choice to make it moral. It is "power" that respects itself and other Markkula application ethics centers. Although morality may be consistent with moral absoluteism (regardless of the outcome, certain actions are considered wrong), it is not necessarily the case. Immanuel Kant, for example, is famous for saying that a lie is always wrong even if the murderer asks for a potential victim's whereabouts. However, others like W.D. Ross (1877-1971) believe that lying to others and lying about the fact that the outcome of other actions is sometimes right (moral relativism). Since ethics considers ethical rules to associate people with their responsibilities, it is sometimes described as "responsibly based" or "based on duty" ethics. The term "moral theory" is derived from the Greek "deon" and means "obligation" or "obligation". "Logo" means "speaking" or "learning" and was first used as "5 species" in 1930. Enter "" in the book. CD Broad by Moral Theory "(1887 - 1971) Whoever thinks lies are always wrong, whether they are adults or whites. When we were young, my parents know that lies are not the right thing to us, they always say that you should not lie to others. But in fact, even if they have the same childhood experience, many people lie to each other. It can not be denied that, especially for your close friend and your family, it is not a lie act. We can always hear that "If you lie to me, you will not be my friend." My husband and wife choose to lie to their partner, which means that their marriage has ended. There are many reasons, but sometimes you lie down, you get injured or even injure someone. Lying for this purpose should be banned Is it always wrong to tell a lie? • To protect yourself or others' safety - the only way to keep secrets and promises - not to hurt your enemies - lie to your children - when your parents do not expect to lie Things "Your career" (privacy). • "White lies" (ie throwing away and deceiving) is a surprise party for her. Someone has escaped from a professional killer and is telling you that he wants to go home to hide. Then the murderer came

There are things like saying "clay clay" that is really crazy - very popular among teenagers, but that confuses the elderly. A baby-boomer generation may still say "Indian Gibber" when it is a child - but today it is clearly considered a racist Recent acquaintances used the word "ridiculous" to explain the mistake, but I was not aware that today's words are commonly used to explain the penis. Words change over time. Usually I forget the origin. So, what is the meaning of old words? We asked Facebook fans what they thought. We also added some of our own ideas. Are there any other suggestions? Please inform us in the comments section "Connection" means that a device, service, or device is up and running, that is, "connecting a cable television". Today, it also means "someone's sexual relationship" or "contact" when meeting someone. 2) "Magic" means centuries ago "It only existed in my imagination". Today, that means something really can not be believed "Bad" is used to describe people who are doing wrong things or people with poor quality. When used today as a proverb, it also means "good" or "good". (And "destruction" means challenging practice and challenging authority.) "Gay" once meant happiness or happiness. In other words, "I do not like gay clothes now." Today, it is usually related to homosexuality, like "same-sex marriage". 6) "Backlog" means the largest fire record of the colonial era. Today, it means that you need to invest in a reserve or a bunch of work "Rubber" was also an eraser (still eraser in the UK). Today, it is usually a condom condoms 8) "A few years ago," leather string "was another word for flip-flops. Today, the string is underwear! "Linda Hervas wrote. 9) "Tool" is used to indicate what you dug out from the garden. Today, it also means that wise people know that they are being used or being used. 10) "Please give me a message." A few years ago it did not make sense. Like "Please write me a letter"? "Amy Richards writes. 12) "Terrible" is used to mean something that brings awe. Today, it means something is bad, or someone seems to be bad. That is exactly like "terrible money", it also means very good things. The intention of this decal is good, but abusing the word "everyday" weakens inspiration. The word "everyday" is an adjective meaning normal or ordinary. No, it is not a daily gift because you can not send an adjective to Christmas and send it. But every day is a gift! This is why it is called a gift. Oh. The cliche police 's obligation is discussed in a separate article. Finally, what I'd like to say is thanks to me, you, other stakeholders, commitment to details, and confidence in revealing these mistakes. Unfortunately, we did not wear official badges. Throughout my life, I always appreciate that grammar police pointed out my mistake and taught me 1 or 2 lessons. When I wrote a poem with "left emotion", I will never forget that the friendly critic said the word "left" is meant for yesterday's dinner. Everyday / every day is confusing. As an adjective, every day (word) means everyday. If you want to say what happened everyday, you need two words: an adjective and a noun. Please note the difference between these two statements. "Kant is known by the same constitution every day at the same time.The exercise and thinking is a daily activity for Kant, which means to mention or directly pay attention." "In the first sentence, Lincoln Refers to the country's father; he has stated the "Declaration of Independence" In everyday use, the meaning has different meanings. Here, the implication of a word contrasts with the main, literal meaning (sometimes called the extension), the exact, actual, or true meaning of the word. Implicit is other content that the word suggests, such as implicit value judgment or emotion. For example, a stubborn person may be described as a strong will or a pig's head. These have the same literal meaning (ie stubbornness), but strong will

60 years ago, everyone had overwhelming pride and responsibility to our country, but this changed dramatically with time. Responsibility is defined as service to the state, obligation, assigned task, or necessary. Today, responsibility is an outdated, irrelevant, nonexistent concept. "December 7, 1941 - a shameful life - the United States was suddenly attacked by Japanese Imperial Navy and Air Force" President Roosevelt made this speech following a deliberate attack on Pearl Harbor. The concept of moral obligation and moral responsibility (moral justification and moral error, and if mentally possible "moral consciousness" is "to survive" or "survival derivative") From the earliest concepts that should be abandoned In this document, Mr. Richter divides his paper into five parts, the first part summarizing Elizabeth Anscombe's research according to the second paper. Using this theory, she insists that the word should be "should", "should", "necessary", and "greatest". The meaning of the word "should" is that if a person should "do" something, such a result will minimize someone's happiness. essay.com/Journal Review - an inconsistency of ethical "should", an analysis of the article titled "Elizabeth Anskom's" Modern Moral Philosophy ". Journal Review - An inconsistency of ethical "should", an analysis of Elizabeth Anskom's paper "Modern Moral Philosophy". Responsibility tends to be explained as an emotion that a person should do something, but for other reasons (eg, based on their pain), people do not want to do so. But "responsibility" actually means that you should take certain actions, regardless of whether you are based on other reasons you want to do. One of the effects of forming a due diligence habit is that anyone may need to reduce due diligence for other reasons. For example, if you acquire the habit of getting up early, you get easy to get up early, it is not that much unpleasant. Rational human condition 4, Kant Ethics and the existence of humans: Studies of moral philosophy - Section 1.0, Existential Kant Ethics, Section 1.1, Ethics, Morals, and EKE There are two troublesome questions about Douglas's strong concept of maintaining the duty of natural rights. First of all, I am worried that incompleteness of responsibility may make it meaningless. In other words, the responsibility is very wide - its universality gives us a sense of responsibility to everyone - the way it performs its duties is so difficult to imagine how to achieve it in the world . Secondly, I am worried that this idea may lead to too broad reason for outrageous violence. Although the ethics of the Burns case is complicated, I think that it is not difficult for most of modern readers to find sympathy in the position of Douglas. "Fugitive Slavery Law" makes us feel very unfair, slave catcher apparently seems immoral, and the purpose of pursuit - liberation of burns - seems to be justice without doubt

Will a moral person steal? This is a dilemma. This results in a basic problem of whether people are satisfied simply because of reputation or actual moral value. I think that really gentle people will not steal the latter and their values. This is based on the idea that not all good deeds will be rewarded. Certainly, if things you do good have not been praised, you may start to get bored of doing so. I do not think this man will start stealing. Essentially, if I do something bad about the world I am doing, this is not moral. Please steal as an example. According to Kant, if you are thinking about stealing, you have to think what will happen if everyone can steal. Stealing is not moral, as some people steal what you just stolen. Second, Kant said that you should not treat someone as the only way to end or end. If you intend to steal something from someone else, you use it to get the stolen item. He should say that every reasonable action should be a will, but everyone should be able to exercise freely. I might steal it and I may not think it is a problem - but if I do it may not agree with anyone, and I eventually can deprive of their autonomy I will. These formulas provide an objective moral code that respects autonomy and authority. What is justice? Everyone would say this is what the law says and how people follow it. The man who steal money from the poor is actually in prison. The killed man should also be executed. But how about morality? A man who stole bread to feed hungry families is imprisoned. A man killed a man who attacked and threatened his family's life. This changed the situation, but who is really a criminal? This idea makes me think. Can you ignore a good thief and punish a bad thief? No, that's not all. What you have to do is to punish both, but you will not receive anything. The crime committed by this magical person, or the collection of these fine photos, is almost always nonviolent. His crime has been exhausted by stealing food, stealing beer, stealing pizza, stealing tobacco, shoplifting, robbing of food items. Distorted male deviations - accidents, poverty, struggles, and unfortunate crimes. I wrote these stories and reported them easily and accurately without commenting each time (I received little information and took a coarse picture of the particles). But each time I do this, I can not help wondering whether I am used to speaking about good and evil, social problems, and the stories about "some kind of" people.

During and after the American Revolutionary War, many of the main ideas of Enlightenment were used as guidelines for influencing issues such as the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. The United States is based on key figures like Thomas Jefferson, which is heavily influenced by enlightenment activities. The great British who was developed by John Rock and many other thinkers had their own enlightenment in front of the United States. American enlightenment was an era of intellectual disorder in 13 American colonies from the 17th century to the 18th century, which led to the American Revolutionary War and the creation of the American Republic. American enlightenment was influenced by European enlightenment of the 17th century and its American philosophy. According to James McGregor Burns, the spirit of enlightenment in America is a practical and useful form that makes enlightenment ideal in the lives of the country and its people. During and after the American Revolutionary War, many of the main ideas of Enlightenment were used as guidelines for influencing issues such as the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. The United States is based on key figures like Thomas Jefferson, which is heavily influenced by enlightenment activities. - The attraction of black movies and the influence on the history of the United States is still elusive. On the backdrop of forced and fanaticism, these films left political and moral indelible signs to the global community, especially the American society. The movie 'Noir' began showing in the United States two years before the Second World War. Summary: The American history course lasts one year and is divided into two semesters. Each semester focuses on different aspects of American culture through national history. The first semester starts with the period of enlightenment and the influence on our government. The end of the first term is the end of the civil war. The second semester will focus on the rise of our superpowers from World War I to the present. In every part of American history, we will discover the important influence of our country including men and women, culture and ethnicity. In this course we will use the main sources of information in each period to extend the actual events, thoughts, and emotions that are occurring. In our school education, we have learned the founder's great achievement, but rarely know the philosopher who influences them. The American Revolution happened at the peak of the age of enlightenment. In other words, the influence of enlightenment is common to our political system and philosophy. Two of the most famous people in enlightenment, Immanuel Kant and Jean-Jacques Rousseau, had a great influence on the political regime of the United States. Kant 's influence on American politics is most clearly reflected in the freedom given by the Constitution, and Rousseau' s social contract theory influences the role of government in society.

Bishop of Hippo Augustine was one of the greatest theologians of his time. He is still considered to be the most advanced. He was brought up in a dismissed house, but as time went on he found out the truth. He is always an excellent student. He completely acquired Latin; however, he did not catch the Greeks. He is also very embarrassed about his speech - if you want, he will use the rhetorical black band. After teens turmoil and rebellion, he found a heretic and participated for a while. He traveled in Milan, landed for a while, and met the bishop. Sant Augustine in Hippo (354 - 430 BC) was an Algerian - Roman philosopher, Rome / early medieval theologian. He was one of the most important early persons in the development of Christianity in the West and was an important person in the bringing of Christianity into the rule of the former pagan Roman Empire. He is often the father of Orthodox theology, the greatest of the four Latin church fathers (and St. Ambrose, St. Jerome and St. Gregory). Unlike scholars after Aristotle adopted Aristotle as Christian thought as a classic model, Augustine developed a system of philosophy and theology using Plato and Neoplatinic elements to support Christian legitimacy did. Many of his works have had a major impact on the medieval world view. The medieval Christian philosophy is based on the work of Bishop Augustine Bishop and theologian Thomas Aquinas and understands the evil from the viewpoint of the absolute Bible and the error of the Bible and Plato and Aristotle high their concept of Summum bonum I am evaluating. The influence meditation is a way to understand good ideas. The background of the important enlightenment of the "good" research is its significance in the study of "good, true and beauty" seen in Immanuel Kant and other enlightened philosophers and religious thinkers. These discussions were made by Kant, especially in the context of his practical rational criticism. Saint Augustine has a deep and complicated character. He is a philosopher, a theologian, a mysticist, a poet, a lecturer, a debater, a writer and a shepherd. Many of his qualities praise each other, saying "Heather Bishop" of Pipp XI "Almost none or only a few people can start from humans until today". Shepherd, he defined himself as "a servant of Christ and servants of the servant of Christ". His life embodies these words as all the consequences: to make the most of the need of the believer. Ask for a redemptive request ("I do not want to be saved without you"); ask God to prepare for his flock for death; even if they abuse him for not having love for him . In a nutshell, he is the shepherd in a perfect sense.

The story of Tokyo was supervised by Kojiro Ozu and was announced in Japan in 1953. This is about an elderly couple visiting Tokyo to visit children. They are warmly welcomed, but they are seen as having annoyances in their busy lives. Mothers were sick, and they died soon after they returned home. And I let my family contemplate her visit. Some of the eye-catching scenes include the future of grandmother who dreams of walking with their grandchildren, the elder couple visiting the spa, and the three old people who discuss the failure of future generations. In 1936, Sion's of Zion. Director Kenji Mizuchiguchi. Two sisters of Yamada Isuzu and Umemura Yoko starred and they have different opinions about their occupations. The story of floating weeds, 1934. Directed by Kojiro Ozu. The leading actors Takeshi Sakamoto, Nagako Iida, and Hideo Mitsui are starring actors trying to reconnect with their sons and older flames. The last story of the chrysanthemum, 1939. Director Kenji Mizuchiguchi. With starring Shuutaro Hanayanagi and Maki Mori, the man became a great actor with the help of his common law wife. Director Kojiro Ozu in 1931 Tokyo Choir. Yuko Emiko, a man from Tatsuo Saito, a man starring Tokihiko Okada, was dismissed, found a job and tried to meet her family again. Tokyo story, 1953. Director Ozu Daijiro. By starring Chish Ryu, Higashiyama Chieko, Hara Setsuko, Sugimura Haruko, the couple noticed that the children were too busy when visiting Tokyo. Tokyo Twilight in 1957. Directed by Kojiro Ozu. Fuzuki, 1953 Tokyo Twilight Saga (dusk of Tokyo) is in the dark, like smoke bars, mahjong halls, backyards, broken houses. For families in the process of transformation, this is a very dark Ozu story, just like all of his late movies, this is two uninterruptedly carefully placed shots. In addition to these, these characters are contained in the lower half of Ozu's broad halftone, and the normal sections of gardens and tree-lined streets are replaced by urban mysterious alleys and neon signs. Perhaps the most painful moment of beauty may be the story of Kojiro Ozu, the most beautiful movie ever in history. There is a very sad smile on her face, "Yes." In other words, we have this highest or highest moral value. Too many human limits are closely related. In the face of our deep commitment to advanced principlified authenticity, maximum or ideal rational normative criteria, we must understand how we can achieve our own unique limits and our own pure, You can reach an agreement with a crooked personality The last hardest element of existing Kant Ethics. But by previewing, I can say that. Get another hint from Ozu Reasonable Human Condition 4, Kant Ethics and Human Presence: Study of Moral Philosophy - Section 1.5, Why, in the depths of your heart, you are an Existential Cant Ethologist

How to maintain international social order We believe that these truths are self-evident. People are born equally and the Creator gives them certain nontransferable rights, including the pursuit of life, freedom and happiness. In order to ensure these rights, the government obtains its legitimate rights from the consent of those established and dominated by humans. At the outset, the Declaration of Independence of America declares collective goals of Americans as a society and means to protect these goals. "British school" of international relations, also known as international society, liberal realism, rationalism or UK institutionalists, still has a "domestic society" at the international level despite the "disorderly" situation (Literally) lack of ruler or the world of the world) As Martin White did in the lectures of the London School of Economics in the 1950s, the extensive research of the British School was a reflection of the past international theoretical tradition Includes consideration. Hobbes (after Thomas) Hobbes), 2) Rationalists (or after Grotten, Hugo Grotius) 3) Revolutionists (or Kant, after Emanuel Kant). Roughly speaking, the UK school itself supports rationalist or Groatian traditions and is seeking an intermediate route (or through the media) between realistic "power politics" and revolutionary "utopianism" I will. The international social theory, also known as the UK school, focuses on common national norms and values, and how they regulate international relations. Examples of these norms are diplomacy, order and international law. Unlike neo-realism, it is not necessarily a positivist. Theorists can be divided into solidarityists who pay particular attention to humanitarian intervention and tend to claim it and more valuable pluralists in order and sovereignty. Nicholas Wheeler is a famous unificationist, Hedley Bull and Robert H. Jackson According to Boolean, the international community has five key institutions that are key to promoting order. These include diplomacy, international law, power balance, war and power management system. According to this classification, the major powers play an administrative role in the international community. In addition, their benefits extend throughout the system, so every event in the system will affect their interests. Therefore, hegemony is essential for managing mutual relations and establishing order by managing relationships between small countries within its influence (Bull 213). Therefore, supremacy recognizes each other's range of influence and maintains good relations with each other by ensuring that they no longer interfere.

Reality and politicians (especially Klein), and victim complete our Athens playwright Aristophanes comedy bit of Ness, such as song and dance performances of jokes about imitation of contemporary literature, (Euripides and Aristophanes were Mashi Herodotus ). The joke is not very subtle. In general, there is a happy ending, a wonderful dinner after some complicated things, someone suggesting a crazy plan (...... private peace treaty, God of blessing blindness blindness) The most famous Aristo play, they Lysistrata as long as it does not end the Peloponnesian War between Athens and Sparta, Greek women, we decided not to have her husband and sex. In another drama "cloud", the philosopher Socrates is mocked. In Frogs, Euripides and Ice Cyrus claim to be beyond those who are better poets. This is the world's oldest literary criticism Aeschylus, OresteiaAristishanes, bird, Aristo, cloud Aristo, frog Aristophanes, Aristophanes, Knights of LysistrataAristophanes, peace ÂCuvier, revolutionary upheaval of the discourse of the Earth  Descartes ÂThe surface, discourse  method ÂEuripides, ÂBacchaeÂEuripides, Medea € ¢ â Euripides, ÂOrestes Homer, I Iliad (complete â and ÂAbridged) Homer, Odyssey â (â completely ÂAbridged) K Kant, universal history  natural paradise and  Kant theory, permanent peace  Rukurebin Hughes,  Nietzsche nature of things, good and evil Nietzsche, tragedy of Nietzsche's birth Â, Sophocles AB, genealogy of moral  Nietzsche of Guke,  Adams source follower Crested beyond the history  use and abuse, Antigone source follower cress, Oedipus Rex  Sophocles, Philoctetes For a long time, Plato, Aristophanes are seen as a pioneer of moral criticism poetry. They share conservative sensitivity over Aristo's defamation of Cloud Socrates (Nussbaum 1980). Critics are not always recognized as the influence of Aristo Plato, but also to the essence of imitation. He is used in the technical meaning of words to describe fraud and concealment proposals as well as actors in the drama of what he made. In addition to the conflict between women of Thesmophoria celebrating, such as Ice Cyrus and Euripides, frogs, they are called to imitate the destruction of life and to oppose its natural opposition. Women celebrate the Thesmophoria is suggested Plato, can be said to have discovered the ambiguity dramatic imitation of, in the Republic, composition and performance, since the combination of the role of the present invention is drawn to mimicry, the (1999 Papas) In the class, we discussed in detail the classical Greek drama and the historical background of the women's peace of Aristophanes. Aristophanes is Lysistrata, which play a useful insight into the presence of what age and a large amount of information can not be confirmed, the history of one of the women, it is seen as a form of women is the only entertainment So laughed at the door expanded. Aristophanes 'Lysistrata is a performance of Athens' original drama. - The type of power play due to malicious shock may lead people to make decisions for others who are useless. Midsummer night's dream was written over time, in favor of women, not men. In other words, men have the right to manage events in their own life and others are considered to be unimportant lives.

Utilitarian utilitarianism of Mil is a result-oriented moral theory, which means that the morals of our actions are judged by the results they bring. According to Utilitarianism, all our actions should promote happiness. For Mill, happiness is fun and there is no pain. In this article I will explain Mill's reaction to opposition to Utilitarianism applied only to pigs and to the opposite. People who reject this moral theory would say that Utilitarianism does not give humans sufficient life value compared to pigs. The fundamental principles of John Mill's utilitarianism and Emanuel Kant's moral metaphysics suggest different views of the two philosophers about the field of moral philosophy. Compared to Kant 's metaphysical segmentation and its use in proof of validity and error, Mill' s utilitarianism is a more sophisticated ethical theory. Kant takes his confirmation of metaphysical survival as discipline of his moral philosophy. If the law has moral power it will be the foundation. Concept of utility principle given by John Stuart Mill. In the article "What is Utilitarianism" #, Mill proposed a theory of utilitarianism, he summarized his "utility" or "principle of maximum happiness" (Mill 89). The focus of Mill is "happiness" based on behavior, # lack of happiness and pain, or "unhappiness", # lack of goods and satisfaction, not a related intention (Mill 89). After evaluating Mill's principle, I will finish this. Mill's Utilitarianism (1861) is an extended interpretation of utilitarian moral theory. In response to the criticism of doctrine, Muller not only approved Jeremy Bentham's basic principle but also made some major improvements to its structure, importance and application. Advances in moral philosophy are limited by infinite controversy over the reality and nature of the best profit, but Moore believes that everyone thinks that the outcome of human behavior will make a significant contribution to their moral value I believe from the beginning that I can do it. (Utilitarianism 1) Responsible Mueller needs to solve various fields of Utilitarian view. In his central details of the Utilitarian standards of Chapter 2, Muller promises to utilize Utilitarianism in multiple clauses. In the same chapter, he focuses on the happiness of action and makes the rules an important role in moral reasoning. Both are used to make him a rule of utilitarian doctrine. However, as these claims can be harmonized with direct utilitarianism, there is no reason to deviate from the utilitarian interpretation of the traditional behavior of this chapter. But in chapter 5, Moore introduced indirect utilitarianism into sanctioned utilitarian doctrine. In the concept of Muller's responsibility, it is difficult to match these direct and indirect factors.

John Rawls' social contract theory challenges Utilitarianism by pointing out an impractical theory. In the Utilitarian society, civil rights can be completely ignored if corruption against this citizen benefits others in society. Rawls believes that social contract theory similar to that proposed by Hobbes, Rock, Rousseau is a more reasonable solution to the fairness of every government. A general social contract theory, including Rawls' perspective, is that in a society where self-interest, rationality, and equality are established, rules of justice are established by mutually reinforcing things. Political philosopher John Rawls uses the Utilitarian view of Bentham and Mill, the concept of social contract of John Rock, and the concept of absolute command of Kant. "Even if we can not exceed happiness of society as a whole, everyone has force majeure based on justice.Therefore, justice denies losing freedom Kant against building Kant's justice in an absolute way The moral proposition which denied the moral interest of Mr. His view is clearly reconfirmed in political liberalism and the society is "a system of fair cooperation from one generation to the next as time goes by" It is seen. John Rolls and Utilitarian Heath C. Hawklock John Rawls' social contract theory challenges Utilitarianism by pointing out an impractical theory. In the Utilitarian society, civil rights can be completely ignored if corruption against this citizen benefits others in society. Rawls believes that social contract theory similar to that proposed by Hobbes, Rock, Rousseau is a more logical solution to the fairness of all governments. Since its introduction in 1971, John Rawls's "justice" has become classical. The author has modified the original to remove some of the difficulties encountered by him and others in the original book. Rawls's purpose is to express an important part of the common core of democratic tradition - justice as fairness - to provide an alternative to utilitarianism which has dominated Anglo-Saxon's political thought tradition since the 19th century It is that. Rolls replaced the ideal of social contract with a more satisfying explanation of the basic rights of citizens as freedom and equality and freedom. "Everyone" wrote that "Even if it can not exceed the happiness of society as a whole, it has an invincible sense based on justice." That theory advancing Rawls, Lewis, Lincoln's ideas is as powerful as it was first announced.

Jim realized he was in trouble. When he arrived in the town of South America, he met the Captain, and his army was trying to assassinate 20 Indians to stop other Indians from protesting the government. In this case, the captain leaves another 19 people, but refusing the proposal will result in the captain being killed as planned. All 20 people. Morality is not the result of behavior, it results in correctness or error in behavior, so the result is usually different from morality. The word morality comes from the Greek word deon which means responsibility. Moral theory, regardless of the outcome, we believe that we all have moral obligations to behave according to a set of principles and regulations. In religious doctrines, these principles derive from sacred commandments, so according to religious law we are morally obliged to steal, lie or not to do wrong. Therefore, moral theory and duty have existed for centuries. Immanuel Kant, a supporter of the famous theory, developed a worldly moral theory of the most influential form in 1788. Unlike the theory of religious morality, the rule (or maxim) in Kant's moral theory derives from the reason of human beings. There are five philosophical and moral theories: moral, utilitarianism, moral, rights based methods, and postmodern. The key to morality is "responsibility is important". Moral father: Kant expresses cheating as something, but it is not morally good. He said that this is the cause of external factors, and it may affect people to avoid responsibility. For example, these external factors may motivate you. Most importantly, humans should always act with the most ethical attitude. Problems in real life are far more complicated, but I think morality is a complete explanation of why we can not cheat. This is morally wrong, that is why we must avoid this behavior that may impair our character.

Discussion Socrates is a controversial person. He is depicted as many different characters such as the elderly voice of a voice, such as the cleverness of a great philosopher. The real nature of Socrates is questionable. He is talking about his life view and his life philosophy. Several discussions he spoke were very striking when lying. These arguments are brute and are very obvious throughout his dialogue. According to his dialogue, he felt there were two different lies. Discussion on lying: people should be allowed to make choices based on truth. If one wants a young partner for chemical appeal and worries about older spouses being culturally different, or is afraid of getting sick soon, this is their right. Also lying about age builds your liars relationship, which usually brings more lies. And this assumes that you have not been found all. If on the first day you seem to be older or more ambiguous than you said, even if he / she likes your company, that person will not trust you and will break the relationship maybe. This article shows the authenticity of the relationship between the doctor and the patient, but it is not for flat or insensitive communication. This estimate is always for the truth and lies. However, these arguments support the need for humanitarian clinical judgment about what is being said, time, manner and content. Probably the best way to summarize this discussion is to discuss this topic with a sensitive and humanitarian doctor. Dr. Cicely Saunders, the founder of the hospice movement. Every patient needs to explain his illness and if he wishes to cooperate with his own treatment or to reduce the burden of fear of unknown, this is easy to understand and convince him. Whether to diagnose in a promising situation or to confirm a poor prognosis Although the arguments advocated by Kant and Saint Augustine are effective, they are not always logical and are not always applicable to all situations in accepting liars' non-intelligence. St. Thomas Aquinas agrees with St. Augustine and Kant, lying separately constitutes a mistake or sin; however, he further classifies three different lies. The first one is polite or profitable lies. Secondly, a liar is considered a joke. Finally, the most serious thing is that a mischievous lie is told to others by malicious intent. This is a lie the ancestor of Osprey said. Therefore, Akinus defined the lie as "the heart of one person, and others said that." This is a good definition for Kant and Augustine's total ban on lies. Another way to oppose their view is to argue from a moral point that a lie may not be a real lie. In this case, I think that it is no problem to lie.

Rent from the world's largest e-book store and save it. Read notes on the Web, tablet and on the phone and highlight it and take notes Therefore, I develop fun and business (and pain) and we grow together. From the dissolution of the boyfriend, you can do a lot of things such as marriage, painful abortion, twin joy, game, purchasing a house through illness or treatment. All the steps are like this. I can not "grow" in a better environment. . But this is what you do with these opportunities and your response to them - a good reaction, you will open more doors We like to think of "growth" as a modern phenomenon - first love and youth anxiety, not knowing what is dominant, and it seems to be unique in our era - but actually The concept started in the 18th century. "This was the first time that growth took place in the middle of the 18th century and people actually chose to become something other than their parents," Nehman told me on the phone. Naman's inclined Kant and Rousseau philosophers throughout the book pay close attention to these problems. "Despite these differences, Kant and Rousseau are from families we currently call the" working class, "and their education is a miracle," explained Neiman. Therefore, "growth" has a special meaning to them. "The real growth is to think for yourself and this is indeed too too lazy to fear that we should actually do." In Persian there is a concept called sadameh. This means injury, injury, or pain. Up until two days ago, I thought that it particularly refers to future pain and damage. This is the only way I hear about growing up as a warning about what I might happen to take a particular action. In the future, the back feels pain (or sadness), so you should not lift heavy items. My knee feels sad, so I should not run over the mountain. There is another concept called Torushide. It literally translates as "picking", but it refers to a woman beyond her peak. In the traditional Persian Jewish community, I will definitely be 28 years old. Although this term is a bit out of date, many old world ideas have shifted the expiration date to the modern era, but the cultural pressures of the Persian Jewish girls of my age are still to find the right husband It is very fast (or yesterday).

Abstractism, morality, inevitable compromise Summary: Unlimited consequences are recently accepted. Discussion is justified. . A special tradeoff is to increase the speed limit of the interstate highway system. As a society, we seem to accept a trade-off for convenience. This consequential defense may be a style, but it sufficiently demonstrates multiple social decisions to challenge the non - resultant 's justification. Generally, the theory of result-basedism focuses on action. However, this is not necessarily the case. Rule - Resultism is a theory sometimes seen as an attempt to harmonize morality and consequence - in some cases this is called criticism of consequentialism based on rules. Like moralism, rule-based principles think that it is necessary to follow certain rules for ethical behavior. However, rule result principle selects the rule based on the result of selecting these rules. Rule resultismism exists in the form of rule utilitarianism and rule self-interest The theory of professional ethics, or moral theory is very different from the theory of consequences. In moral theory, if behavior is compliant with principle or moral rules, if you do not care about the overall impact, that action is correct. It is these actions that determine whether something is morally right or wrong. It is not the result of result-basedism. Morality is determined by reasonable perception of human responsibility to others (15). Kantoism or Kant ethics is an example of moral ethics, which belongs to the moral theory of rules. Kant said that in order for men to act morally correctly, they must act according to their own obligations. The motive for action ultimately determines whether action is ethical For a variety of reasons, the moral theory of moral decision-making is a different form than moral reasoning, not result-oriented. Contrary to resultsism, the moral theory of morality states that the correctness of action or decision does not depend solely on maximizing societal interests. On the contrary, morality defines the moral correctness or error mistake from the behavior itself, not the behavior of the result. Moral moral decision-making provides clear guidance on moral legitimacy and misbehavior that individuals use in their day-to-day choices. This moral moral guide focuses on individuals rather than maximizing social benefits. Indeed, if it prevents compliance with the ethical standards of the guidelines, morality actually has restrictions that prevent individuals from maximizing products.

Age of Enlightenment encourages everyone to use world reason and science to eliminate world atrocities and superstitions. In fact, Kant believes that "reasons for publicly using people must always be free and that only human beings can bring about human enlightenment" (Kant 3). Enlightenment affected not only philosophy and science but also literature (especially the Papal Human Paper). Romanticism was born in a strict empirical reaction to enlightenment. In Frankenstein, Shelly states as follows. (1) The role of Victor Frankenstein's enlightenment as a hero not only kept him away from nature, but made him his slave of creation. Aggressive romantic characters failed This romantic novel tells the story of scientist Victor Frankenstein and the production of his resistance. Among Frankenstein, Shelley communicates many important features of romantic novels through the integration of love for nature, desire for isolationism, and emotional freedom. An important element in romanticism is alienation from others in society. Victor Frankenstein is the perfect example of a romantic hero. When he graduated from college, he was unable to intentionally keep in touch with his family. Mary Sherry 's Frankenstein showed many Gothic elements, but most people think that it seems like a more romantic novel when it thinks of true inspiration. Victor Frankenstein creates life simply by requiring his love for knowledge and science. Although it eventually disappointed him and it became the destruction of JVC, this monster comes from many creativity. It is most promising not to create anything, it is classified as romantic. Frankenstein is made up of many elements of romanticism, such as supernatural existence, emotions created by characters in stories, and natural influences. One of the main themes of Frankenstein is the pursuit of knowledge and its consequences. Before the romantic era, there was an era of enlightenment. It saw the emergence of rationalism and the continuation of major scientific progress. These involve Mary Sherry and other romantic writers. I am worried that they believe that this rationalist movement is trying to interfere with the laws of nature. This is the basis of the role of Victor Frankenstein. At the age of 17, Frankenstein went to college. So, he met many intellectuals and wise professors. Sadly, this inspiration eventually became obsessive. "We will open up a new way to explore the unknown force and show the world the deepest mystery of creation." From now on, it is hoped that Frankenstein is anxious for achieving greater outcomes than his previous philosopher I understand. He is also aiming to overcome nature. This means that his purpose is to overcome God in order that God is the creator of nature.

Political philosopher John Rawls thinks that a social contract is necessary to treat "justice" as "fair" in order for society to function properly. Rawls believes that social contracts are based on their initial position and everyone decides social rules behind veil of ignorance. In this article we assert that the veil of ignorance is an important feature of the original position. First of all, this article explains the veil of ignorance. Next, I will examine the meaning of Rawls' original position. Being in the original state and wearing a veil of ignorance will deprive one's own tendency to constitute a society around a narrow concern. The problem with adopting a specific framework at the outset is that they define benefits, priorities and goals that can not be used to achieve the concept of social equity. The basic theory of Rawls is that people choose the principle of justice in "original position", which means that they choose the principle of justice according to their basic self-interest. This puts people in their original position behind the "vow of ignorance" and does not know their differences or wrongs. If this ignorance is compromised and there is a difference between individuals, it is impossible to reach a principle agreement. Therefore, the basic rights principle must be applied in order to equalize these differences. Entry essay.com/Philosphy Ethics: Ken Burgess This article contains 3 questions raised by the professor, we need to discuss these issues. The areas of interest I have discussed were Kant, Ian Land, Loa. Entry Philosophy Ethics: Ken Burgess This article contains 3 questions raised by the professor, we need to discuss these issues. The areas of interest I have discussed were Kant, Ian Land, Loa. The original position of Rawls and the "thick" ignorant veil represents not a requirement of utilitarianism but a concept of different fairness. In other words, to consider their desires equally. The initial position is abstracted from all the information on current situation and current situation (including everyone's hope and special interest). Utilitarians consider the desire and interest of people to give and maximize their satisfaction; therefore, Utilitarians consider moral tolerance and desires and preferences of people's desires and preferences We will suspend judgment as to form a system. For Rawls, the main reason for a thick veil of ignorance is the legitimacy of existing social and political systems, as well as the ability to fairly evaluate existing concepts of desire, preference and good will.

A fairy tale is a wonderful, delicate and colorful world, and an ugly beast becomes a prince, a bad guy becomes a stone, a gentle person depicts a creepy and dreadful dark world that returns to the body (Guroian). Fairy tales have been part of our world for a long time and come in several forms, from simple sleeping story to complex plays, musicals and movies. But these seemingly simple stories are not mere elusive dust or toxic apple. People can compare fairy tales with the new Chef Boyardee; Chef Boyardee hides vegetables with his beggar, and fairy tales make social morals and lessons of many lives in the stories of these simple children I hide it. According to Greenblatt, Pelagius represents primitive and simple moral theology. We are all rational and morally capable creatures, each one of us can build our own moral integrity. Greenbright writes that "we are in a free state" and is shaping our own living. We were born to be free and then we learn that we will not be free; we are freedom, then chains. Pelagius represents a classic humanitarian who believes in the moral toughness and wisdom of mankind. Again Greenblatt: It is now widely seen that rights are legally enforceable moral claims. Historically, these are often referred to as "complete rights" and "imperfect rights" create moral obligations based on voluntary compliance. For example, when philosophers of the 17th and 18th centuries talked about "charity" and its corresponding charity obligation, they usually have the right and obligation to express "incomplete" (although not always), that is, It implies what you should do. . As a matter of conscience, but as something we might be forced legally. The so-called incomplete rights of the so-called poor people's charitable activities means that they have moral obligations to help others who need help, but this statement can not be compelled forcibly. action In addition to distinguishing between full and incomplete obligations, Kant believes that normal moral thinking is aware of another fundamental difference in our moral responsibility. This is the difference between responsibility for yourself and responsibility for others. Kant provides four examples of ways to test morally-accepted maxims in this way using absolute orders (norms of full obligation to self and others, self and others to others Complete duty). . These examples show that absolute commands can be used to generate all recognized responsibilities. Kant's example is not a suicide but a complete responsibility to himself, an imperfect responsibility to our own talent, a complete responsibility to not lie or make a promised falsehood, a failure to do other people's deeds Full responsibility is included.

During enlightenment, revolutionary philosophers invited philosophers to a new idea to better understand and improve their society. They are contemporary thinkers, taking into account the best interests of society. Each philosophy has his or her own thoughts, but they all evolve around the theme: equality and human freedom. A famous and influential philosopher is John Locke. Rock born in England in the middle of the 17th century experienced the British Civil War and the glorious revolution. He firmly believes in the equality of all people. In his book "Second Paper of Citizenship" he says, "Whether the creatures of the same species and grade ... should be the same even if they do not belong ... ... more content Show Voltaire said that only two religions allow the population to cause hatred and competition between the two groups. But if all religions are tolerated, accepted and represented, peace will be remarkable and the government will function effectively for the benefit of all people. All concerns are not only for one or two groups, but for many groups, reflecting the rights of everyone as religious equality is brought to everyone. Adam Smith, known as the father of contemporary economics, is a major supporter of the private market. He supports an economic system based on personal decisions rather than government decisions. Smith thinks that no one or group is suitable for making decisions for a large number of people, and people know how to make a decision on their own welfare. In Smith 's mind people try to supplement their lives, but when seeking personal economic benefits they mistakenly promote society and stimulate the economy in subconscious mind. If people earn more money by working hard, most people will work hard. Smith suggested that people are self defensive naturally, and defaults are selfish, but to a certain extent. In this world, if you have enough money, you can get most of it. Smith thinks that everyone should be free The turning point of how people see the government and society is enlightenment. In enlightenment, philosophers tried to change the traditional European order. A new era of reason will support progress and support the use of reason. This is contrary to the old order which used religion as the main source of answers to questions. The church and the government seek out the ideas that appeared in enlightenment, but the thoughts that appeared in enlightenment can still change the world. Many of the ideas suggested during enlightenment changed the government, society, and changed the world. He is a German philosopher living in the 18th century, an important part of enlightenment. He is responsible for many of our key ideas relating to enlightenment, especially in addition to our own reasons, we are concerned with an authoritative viewpoint, ie a question about the way we live our life You should trust all the most basic questions. The ultimate authority is that we can gather from exercising our rationality. This is not coincidence. There is Kant's biography. Not long ago - about fifteen years ago - I personally found an interesting reading, but I had a very strong interest in Kant. (I call Manfred Kuehn's biography Kant: Biography.) For most people, this is not particularly moving reading. Kant has not that funny life

Introduction Alison Jaggar discusses the relationship between the nature of work and capitalism on the theme of feminist politics and humanity, and compares it with economic democracy, which is my favorite economic system. Jaguar proposed rational and effective discussion about economic democracy. Capitalist advocates can not prove their claim that capitalism is better than economic democracy. It is only a small part of the population. There are many philosophical criticisms about the way of ability. This article will focus on the criticism of global feminist ethics, especially the criticism advocated by Alison Jaggar who is widely writing about feminist concerns. Criticism of Alison Jaggar is important because it embodies many questions about power relations (Jaggar, 1991, 1998, 2006; Kleist, 2010). The criticism of Jaggar is limited to Nussbaum and her version of competency method, and it solves the logical rationale and the central competency list. If morality relates to human liberation, the summary of Allison Jaguar on the four functions of feminist ethics can not be improved in any way. According to Jaguar's opinion, all feminists accept ethics, (1) clarify moral criticisms of actions and practices, (2) prescribe a morally reasonable way to resist these practices and practices It is to be. (3) an ethical and sensible alternative to such behavior and practice; (4) not seriously thinking women's moral experience seriously (Jaggar, "Feminist Ethics", 1992). Feminist ethicists should first focus on improving the overall situation of women, especially children, elderly, invalid, disabled, disadvantaged groups and other vulnerable groups. Little attention has been paid to women's lives and profits. Alison Jaggar explains this in the article "Feminist Ethics: Problems, Project Prospect" by Claudia Card (ed.) Feminist Ethics (1991: University of Kansas Press). She said that ethical issues such as areas related to women (no matter how tilted), families, "private" areas are ethical and how truly ethical matters are problems in the public and political sectors It was pointed out. Emphasize rationality. Utilitarianism and Kantoism deny feelings implicitly or explicitly making moral decisions. Bentham is proud of his "objectivity" of the story - moral calculations can do any rational person and can reach the same conclusion. Likewise, Kant completely refuses to include emotions in making moral decisions - in fact, for Kant, their tolerance can compromise any morality that may be involved. Like Paul Taylor said:

In George Orwell's short story "A Hanging" Myanmar is about to get up. Those who commit a crime of anonymity are about to be punished by the final death sentences. This story details his short walk to the gallows, and he will face his death. Everyone in the prison camp knows what happens and everyone has a melancholic feeling. The sheriff demanded that death be done soon so that the day can proceed normally. When the young county magistrates saw a painful walk he realized that the prisoner was roaming in the puddle. I will take his murder case as an example. Murder is a very immoral act against the human body. The body can be found in space and time. They are. There is no other way. There is no such murder in the abstract. Jesus believes that homicide in your heart is equal to true murder, but this is not an absolute crime. Theft is similar to destruction of property and property. These are behaviors directed to the "body" owned by the human body or individual. Therefore, in the case of a moral judgment about a specific human body, there is a strange situation that God's self identity exists in space-time. Kant did not explain this. In fact, I can not explain his problem. We pretend to think about these issues like 'cant', and pretend that there is a quick and quick distinction between facts and values, they are bound to have a boundary between them It can not be decided accurately. The moral dilemma is like this. As a continuous killer is in front of you and asks where your child is, the murderer can kill them. Are you lying? While he was still alive, Kant himself was actually asked this question, and in his paper he answered questions about lying down from the motive of kindness. Basically, people should not tell a lie, but this does not prevent you from closing the door to a continuous murder case and after telling him where your child is in your house. It is an alarm. In his article Kant said that someone who uses a continuous killer as a means for you to accomplish the purpose rather than the murderer is over lying in this situation (and similar situation / in general) I will continue to argue. Two serious problems occurred in the investigation of the serial murder case. First, the murderer and the victim are completely strangers. In the "typical" murder case, the murderer is familiar to the victim, but in most serial murder cases there is no previous association between the two, and the positioning of the murderer is complicated . The second question is that most serial killers seem to be normal; they have work, they are famous neighbors, and some even have families. Therefore, they are suspected of being very unlikely to commit a crime. For example, the serial killer Robert Yates, who was run in Washington in the 1990s, was a married father of five men who worked in the US Air Force who killed 13 prostitutes; "Green River Killer" Gary Ritchie got married Three times, including when he was arrested. He killed 10 victims in Kansas State

Skepticism believes that there is no way to prove that things exist outside of us. As skeptics think that we can not distinguish between dreams and reality, I think the real thing is probably the creation of our thoughts, and we think that it is like the brain sitting in a big bucket It's simple. Let's connect to the machine to simulate the perfect performance in reality, let's live the "brain" in it 1 An excerpt from the same-name article "certificate of the outside world", GE I examined some responses to the skeptical challenges presented in Part 2. In particular, we saw four answers: (1) Descartes Cogito, (2) GE. "Proof" to Moore's outside world, (3) Dretsk denies cognitive closure, and (4) David Lewis's contextualism. After considering the strengths and weaknesses of these proposed solutions, we review the question whether skepticism is so bad or not and draw a conclusion. This course concludes with a discussion of why we have the concept of knowledge. If there is no concept of knowledge we are accustomed to, what kind of life will it be? Does this gap in our cognitive economy affect widespread or is our life as generic as that? In order to better understand if the concept is important or important, we will consider what kind of life can exist without knowledge of knowledge. Moore 's "evidence of the outside world" was created for the purpose of the soul, aimed at solving the "philosophical scandal" of Immanuel Kant. Obviously not enough for Kant and other philosophers. I believe the belief he said is true common sense, I believe in existence, and many other examples of congenital knowledge. A new approach to protect Moore's common sense is also evident in his most famous thesis, the proof of the outside world (Moore 1939). Here, after considerable effort to understand the meaning of "external object" as "there is something that is not dependent on our experience", Moore said that the perfect idea of ​​the existence of such objects in this way It can be proved that it can prove it. The hand is "a CS proposition with a common meaning, use it according to this meaning, and the hand to be examined is enough to prove that the proposition is true - on the other hand there is certainly a hand The hand is matter matter, and matter matter is according to the usual meaning of "physical object" is an external object

A way for liberalism and realism to confront liberals. In order to define a viewpoint in international relations, we must understand its origin and major authors, including the context they write. Because liberalism has many writers in history, it is one of the more loosely defined views. Liberalism depends mainly on good aspects of human nature. One of the most famous liberal writers is Kant. He often writes about the disorderly nature of international relations - calling it "lawless barbarian". He also wrote the three main ways of achieving peace in this system, a way to deal with every aspect of human life using human beings. Mainstream international relations theories are "realism" and "freedom institutionism". Realists believe that the state is in a disorder of world politics and that each country pays attention to their national interests. The concept known as "security dilemma" arises from the view that all countries are potential enemies and strengthening the security of a country leads to a relative loss of security in all other countries I will. Realists measure power based on material capabilities such as military expenses and natural resources. Realism believes that peace can last only through equilibrium of power between several countries, not the world of bipolar hegemony. Kenneth Waltz best summarizes the basic elements of realism. "British school" of international relations, also known as international society, liberal realism, rationalism or UK institutionalists, still has a "domestic society" at the international level despite the "disorderly" situation (Literally) lack of ruler or the world of the world) As Martin White did in the lectures of the London School of Economics in the 1950s, the extensive research of the British School was a reflection of the past international theoretical tradition Includes consideration. Hobbes (after Thomas) Hobbes), 2) Rationalists (or after Grotten, Hugo Grotius) 3) Revolutionists (or Kant, after Emanuel Kant). Roughly speaking, the UK school itself supports rationalist or Groatian traditions and is seeking an intermediate route (or through the media) between realistic "power politics" and revolutionary "utopianism" I will. "British school" of international relations, also known as international society, liberal realism, rationalism or British institutionalists, lacks "national society", ie control, at the international level, despite "disorder" I believe. Or the country of the world. Despite being called a British school, many scholars of this school are neither British nor British. Broadly speaking, the UK school itself supports rationalism and the tradition of Groathia, seeking an intermediate route (or through the media) between realistic power politics and the revolutionary "utopianism" . The English school refused to accept the behaviorist approach of international relations theory. International relations theory is a typical study of the basic insight of international relations and its origins.

In order to trace the origin of the transcendental movement, people need to return to Concord, Massachusetts. In the early nineteenth century, many famous and internationally renowned writers followed a practice of one person, Ralph Waldo Emerson. Emerson was once regarded as the first philosopher in the United States, but previously visited Europe and was fascinated by the concept of German philosophers known as Kant. According to Emerson's understanding of Kant, in this world there are two pure things that are the basis of all of nature and soul. The protagonists of the transcendental movement are Ralph Waldo Emerson, Henry David Thoreau, John Muir, Margaret Fuller and Amos Bronson Arcot. Other prominent transcendents include Luisa May Olcott, Charles Timothy Brooks, Osters Brownson, William Erie Channing, William Henry Channing, Christopher Earrings Crunch, Walt Whitman, John Sullivan Dwight, Conference Francis, William Henry Furness, Frederick Henry Hedge, Sylvester Judd, Theodore Parker, Elizabeth Palmer Peabody, George Ripley, Thomas Treadwell Stone, Emily Dickinson and Jones Berry Ralph Waldo Emerson as a pioneer of transcendence and Henry David Thoreau transcendence was a writing movement that took place in the mid - 19th century. It generally reached the peak of the American Renaissance, the American Golden Day, or the era called New England, formed in the middle of the early 19th century. The basic principles of transcendence include relationships between themselves and the whole world. First of all, in the "independence" of Ralph Waldo Emerson, Emerson called all of the community to be completely faithful to themselves. He insists that the most important thing for individuals and society is not to believe others' beliefs, but to make people believe in their ideas. Emerson believes that integrity will eventually lead to personal death, as people live for others and they are not loyal to themselves. So, in order to build a good society, citizens must concentrate.

Is the animal worthwhile? Thirty years ago, Congress passed the law to protect animals that are afraid of extinction. The Endangered Species Act of 1973 outlines the government and civic responsibilities for these animals. It requires assessment of seed every 5 years and determines whether they are in danger of extinction, they are at risk of extinction and threats. It deserves attention. Why are these marginalized animals so worthwhile? This is the old supply and demand law - the theme park is nearly impossible to get wild animals, they are trying to breed them with captive body. However, there are few individuals of capture species, inbreeding and all genetic responsibilities related to it are inevitable, and the ocean world is eager to deepen its gene pool. In Frankenstein - Esk Movement, Ocean World applied for and obtained permission to harvest reproductive organs from dead animals. Is the animal worthwhile? Thirty years ago, Congress passed the law to protect animals that are afraid of extinction. The Endangered Species Act of 1973 outlines the government and civic responsibilities for these animals. - Ancient Chinese history China is in East Asia. The northern part of ancient China is the Gobi desert, the east is the Pacific Ocean, the southwest is the Himalayas, and the west is the Taklamakan Desert. Because of the different habitat they offer, there are various animals on this land. Most agriculture is done in the fertile land of the Yangtze River basin. Ethologist Tom Regan refused to evaluate the moral value of Kant's animal in three respects. First, he rejected Kant's argument that animals do not recognize themselves. Then he questioned that Kant argued that animals could not make moral decisions so they did not have an inherent moral value. Reagan believes that if the moral value of a person depends on its ability to make moral decisions, people who can not be morally ethical need to be treated as equally ethical considerations. Reagan finally believes that Kant argues that animals are not supported solely as a means to achieve their goals; in fact, animals' lives can be better or worse.

People's choices play an important role in their lives. Most of us believe that we can make these choices freely and we have free will to make these choices. What we are missing is that free will is not as simple as it looks. When a person makes a choice he does not think what those things cause is what he does. Therefore, for the desire of whether he made these choices for his own interest or wanted to make these choices. Whether the environment urges him to make these choices or whether he is willing to ignore his own environment. Emmanuel Kant (1724-1804). Kant is a German philosopher writing in the field of metaphysics, ethics and knowledge. He is the founder of the philosophical tradition of exploring the limits of human reason and "establishing a moral philosophy based on responsibility" "Cantianism". His perception of punishment will be seen as pure retribution. He thinks that crime should be punished, but punishment for other purposes such as deterrence is to violate "category order", especially for others for others You should not use it. Well, if human nature is reality, what will happen from a philosophical point of view? Why are people interested in using philosophers and philosophy as a guide for life why this technical debate is concerned. Let's explore this through a brief discussion about two philosophies that provide strong human defense and are consistent with cognitive science: existentialism and stoicism Theology has two forms, philosophy and religion. Philosophical theology ("natural theology") is a subdivision of philosophy. It uses natural human reasons to explore the most important of all problems, questions about God. Religious theology (or "eschatological theology") is to rationally explore the meaning and consequences of faith in revealing religion. Written Bible definitely. Indeed, the brain was not thoroughly investigated and explained until the late 17th century. Until then, humans were respected by the essence of their souls. Philosopher René Descartes began exploring the concept of human "soul" and in 1637 wrote a book called "Methodology" to explain his philosophy. Among them, he mentioned his observations on how animals move and respond without the concept of soul. This "soul" is actually a human brain, and shortly afterwards, Thomas

Fichte's personality theory theme Fichte's Wissenschaftslehre clearly has no other spiritual philosophy in extracting or reasoning personality theory. In addition, it has been proved possible to combine the important concepts of my essay with current neurophysiological thinking about how memory is memorized and retrieved. Therefore, this article will try to perform those wedding ceremonies. The first part of my Descartes' student world may be mentioned by Fichte's "cogito" statement "revision", "I am myself". In his earlier work "Wissenschaftslehre" (scientific theory, 1794), Fichte extended Kant's concept of human ethics to metaphysical pictures of the universe. Fichte rejects the concept of the object itself, simplifies reality to absolute mental prediction, and returns the mind itself to will. The reality standard becomes a practical standard: it is a reality, and beliefs and actions are right or good (the beginning of pragmatism). Fichte emphasized more than Kant that moral responsibility is the goal of life. When Kant criticized the position called Utilitarian later, he separated responsibility from his own interests, but Fichte reaffirms moral responsibility in the form of higher self-interest, and self-actualization is a temporary It was a realization. Kant's successor Johann Gottlieb Fichte assumed the creative self as the ultimate source of reality, which produced all the change and all knowledge. Fichte's theory is detailed in G. W. F. Hegel's absolute idealism. For Hegel, reality is an absolute spirit or rationality, which embodies the development of comprehensive self-consciousness from nature to the history of mankind. British Hegel FH Bradley believes that mediocre experiences are fragmentary and inconsistent and hence appearance; the reality, the absolute, the unified whole, the only absolute , Perhaps through cryptic experience

Realism is an international theory that expresses interest in international politics. The fundamental reason for understanding realism is that many realists have retrospective exhibitions at civil war scholars. Realists are most interested in exploring and understanding more about realism. War problems In addition, realism leads the American leaders to think more about the benefits of achieving peace. Many facts of realists are to increase the interests of the state. I believe the state is the basic role of international politics. Mainstream international relations theories are "realism" and "freedom institutionism". Realists believe that the state is in a disorder of world politics and that each country pays attention to their national interests. The concept known as "security dilemma" arises from the view that all countries are potential enemies and strengthening the security of a country leads to a relative loss of security in all other countries I will. Realists measure power based on material capabilities such as military expenses and natural resources. Realism believes that peace can last only through equilibrium of power between several countries, not the world of bipolar hegemony. Kenneth Waltz best summarizes the basic elements of realism. Although the degree is varied, mainstream international relations theory including realism, liberalism, constructivism, has privileged hegemony and socialization in the construction of international order. The theory of non hegemian international order believes that the international order is not only a function of power and the preference of hegemon (or power). A non-hegemonic international order can be defined as a relatively stable model of interaction between groups of countries, without personal or collective hegemony of the great powers. "British school" of international relations, also known as international society, liberal realism, rationalism or UK institutionalists, still has a "domestic society" at the international level despite the "disorderly" situation (Literally) lack of ruler or the world of the world) As Martin White did in the lectures of the London School of Economics in the 1950s, the extensive research of the British School was a reflection of the past international theoretical tradition Includes consideration. Hobbes (after Thomas) Hobbes), 2) Rationalists (or after Grotten, Hugo Grotius) 3) Revolutionists (or Kant, after Emanuel Kant). Roughly speaking, the UK school itself supports rationalist or Groatian traditions and is seeking an intermediate route (or through the media) between realistic "power politics" and revolutionary "utopianism" I will.

He is trying to prove the existence of God Anselm argument argument argument argument is that his argument is purely based on the mind demo and that actor challenges the real moral sense It does not need it. Ontologies are related or related to something. Anselm 's ontological debate is also considered existence, whether it is possession of God, and is omnipotent, omniscient and kind. This argument is a transcendental argument. An argument about the existence argument argument argument of God is an a priori argument. These arguments try to prove the existence of God from the meaning of the word God. Anselm of Canterbury introduced an ontological argument to his work 'Proslogion'. The classic argument of Anselm is based on two principles, the most important of which are St. Anselm and Rene de Carte of the above Canterbury. If you understand the meaning of talking about God, you must confirm his existence and argument argument must be true. Criticism of the ontological argument began with Gauniro at the same time as St. Anselm. Perhaps the most famous criticism of ontological debate is due to Emmanuel Kant in his criticism of pure reason. Most notably, Kant argues that ontological arguments are at risk by implicit assumptions that "existence" is a predicate. But as Bertrand Russell said, it is easy to be confident that ontological arguments are less accurate than what they are doing. This will help explain why ontological discussions have captivated philosophers for nearly 1000 years. The opposite of argument argument takes many forms. It is intended to apply to all argument arguments and other objections; some contrary intent applies to particular forms of arguments or argument arguments for a particular ontology. For arguments of ontology against the existence of successful generals, this is a matter of controversy. Argument arguments for general criticism are what is being displayed so far: they are not convincing that they are not yet offering a person who does not accept the conclusion of God's existence - And who is rational, reflection, ample information etc. - Whether to consider all the reasons for accepting this conclusion for or against or not. To clarify, the evaluation has made invalid results, etc., or has previously made it clear that there is no reasonable set, reflex, informed of the premise, sufficient existence of all existing occurrences Accepts interpretation of either argument argument

Epistemology is his study of our right to believe in myself. In a broader sense, we start with what we call cognition and ask if we have reason to take these positions. When discussing the cognitive standpoint, we must include both our beliefs and what we know. At a deeper level, we will examine our attitude towards strategies and methods used to acquire new beliefs and filter old beliefs. However, the epistemology relates to whether we acted responsibly in the formation of faith or acted irresponsibly. Alvin Goldman also outlines similar prior knowledge. His explanation is based on two assumptions. At first he is his explanation about the credibility of his understanding. This is followed by a general view that previous knowledge is based on knowledge of "pure thought" processes that function independently of experience and perception. If you can see that humans have reliable natural reasoning and computer systems, and if there is some evidence that we are doing this, these mechanisms are believed to give belief a priori and reasonable It is thoughtful. In particular, the beliefs gained from the behavior of these mechanisms without relying on perception are strong candidates of prior knowledge. Prior knowledge is a way to gain knowledge without the need for experience. In Bruce Russell's article 'A priori knowledge and knowledge' he states that this is "knowledge based on a priori reason 1". Transcendental knowledge contrasts with the posteriori knowledge acquired through experience. All crows are black. If you believe in option A, you believe that it is a priori reason, because you do not need to know that a crow is it a bird. If you believe in choice B, you have a reason to believe it, because you know that they are black, as you have seen many crows. He continued to say that it is not a question whether that statement is true if you believe that one is important. Immanuel Kant made a significant contribution to understanding previous knowledge. He showed that a priori knowledge can be comprehensive, that is, new knowledge can be obtained, which is not implicit in a priori propositions. Before Kant's work, it is generally accepted that all previous knowledge is analytical, ie any knowledge recognized from a priori propositions is included in the proposition and extracted through the analysis It was. David Hume was an early contemporary in the Kantian period and he showed that the reason can not logically deduce its effect (in Kant 's, believed, believed, in a rationalist school). Hume proposed then that there is no prior knowledge of causality. Kant disputed this proposal and argued that it is possible to synthesize a priori knowledge. Russell explains Kant's argument by presenting Kant's stock price example 7 + 5 = 12

You can imagine a cold wind, it only affects you. Perhaps it is a long time of starvation, and it is fun to see the grass. For Elie Wiesel, this is neither imagination nor dream. Since he had such a bad experience in his life, I felt I had to share a book called "Night". Gertrude Samuels who wrote the comment "When evil goes out" tries to help describe the destructive situation experienced by Erie. Samuels started explaining the background of religious child, Erie. I may criticize the faith of a particular Christian, but I have never said that Christianity is stupid or evil. Occasionally my best friend succumbed to the assumption that I joined the tribe "Christians are evil" based on criticism of one doctrine that I gave. In many cases these criticisms will trigger me a wonderful debate about the title "Christian" in the past few years. There were many of the same criticisms that I said many years ago when I still believed in Christian faith. I live well with Christians, I hope that a healthy Christian community will continue to prosper, so I continue to criticize such a thing - and I have some fundamental differences. Until German philosopher Immanuel Kant brings criticism into the domain of theory, it was the first time for us to approach modern critical methodology. In his aesthetic work of aesthetic criticism, he studied the feasibility and logic behind "taste judgment". Based on his aesthetic theory, many sentences concerning writing criticism were born, and criticism continued to name itself. In the 21st century, this age turns aesthetics into business and turns criticism into what we know today. Now is the time to learn how to write reviews. As judicial review should provide bridging and comprehension between first criticism, purely rational criticism, and second critique, ie practical rational criticism, the important Part. Kant's such thing is the actual origin of the "dialectical" process from Hegel and other idealists "dialectic", "opposite" to "inclusiveness" process. However, Kant finally got it was not a bridge. Since transcendence is close to the theoretical reasons, practical rationality gives clues about the transcendental reality (ie God, freedom, immortality) and what aesthetic value theory is to us to enrich clues You can expect to give. Even from Kant's ethics (the "end kingdom"), we expect some sort of transcendence or application, especially when part of Kant's aesthetics is "judgment of the scopos theory". But Kant's aesthetics are subjective

Coincidence of Malebranche: Philosophical summary of the Garden of Eden: According to Malebranche, Adam should be considered a coincidence philosopher. Philosophy not only derives from heaven, it was actually derived from the occultism of Malebranche. This is to be able to adhere to his contingent belief that Adam was given the special ability to his body, the ability to separate the main part of the brain (position of the soul) from others. Body In the history of philosophy there are at least two answers to this question. Nicholas Malebranche invented an unexpected situation, which is why God is alone in all events. Therefore, God 's involvement allows past events to cause future events. Therefore, past and future events are related as God makes it show this way. However, the unexpected situation has been criticized by the poor God's achievement and its power. In contrast, Gottfried Leibniz devised a pre-established harmony theory to explain the progress of events in the world. God is again the only reason for all events, but God has only one intervention to determine the course of all future events. The pre-established harmony theory is similar to the situation someone arranges thousands of Domino in some way. Until the emergence of humanism in the Renaissance, medieval philosophy was dominated by academicism. Modern philosophy began in France in the 17th century and its philosophy was Rene de Carte, Blaze Pascal and Nicolas Marebranche. Descartes revived the Western philosophy, which was rejected after the Greek and Roman era. His idea about the first philosophy changed the main purpose of philosophical thought and raised some basic questions for foreigners such as Spinoza, Leibniz, Hume, Berkeley and Kant. Many philosophers still stand out from the classical tradition and regard their philosophy as a way of life. The most noteworthy of these are René Descartes, Baruch Spinoza, Nicolas Malebranche and Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. With the rise of the university, the concept of modern philosophy became more prominent. Many respected philosophers since the 18th century have participated in university, teaching and developing their work. Early examples include Immanuel Kant, Johann Gottlieb Fichte, Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph Schelling, and Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel.

The paper must be about 4 to 5 pages (minimum 800 pages, maximum 1500 pages). Please summarize all the pages You must include your name, TA's name, and tutorial number. No cover required Please provide a useful and / or imaginative title for your paper (ie it is not simply "paper 3") 1. The basic features of the sweat shop are lack of living wages, long hours of work, unsafe things, and occasionally unsanitary labor conditions. Nicholas Kristof and Sheryl Wu Dunni nevertheless believe that we should be aware of the reaction to the sweat shop because boycotting their products is more harmful than what we would like to help . Is this claim consistent with Kant, the way of ethics of slavery? Comment: Your sentence is very simple, but basically it is only that: the warning about the desirability of a sweatshop of Kristof and WuDunn is incompatible with that kat 's sweatshop' s ethics. Or you can go one step further. For example, Kant condemns / permits the use of labor in exploitation factories, but this conclusion contradicts the assertion that companies should not resist this. ** Comment: Most of your articles should focus on Kant's sweaty store's ethics. In other words, according to Kant's moral point of view, I hope to focus on morally correct ethical issues. In other words, an individual or company treats people in the same way that the owner of the exploitation plant deals with employees. This requires clarifying relevant aspects of the cant system (thus not only summarizing everything you learned about Kant 's ethics) and then applying it in the case of a sweat shop. Once this is done, you should briefly discuss whether this statement is logically consistent with the statements made by Kristof and WuDunn. 2. Weighen Chang compares and contrasts Kant's attitude toward rights and attitudes toward Confucian rights. Comment: You may want to focus on Kant's responsibilities and the Confucian concept, and the relationship between these concepts and human rights concepts. Comment: Regardless of the way, you need to clarify the view of Kant and Confucian rights ** Comment: The paper statement is particularly important for this article. Good comparisons and comparative articles are more than just different similar lists. Instead, you want to concentrate on a common, unified theme. In general it is best to show ways in which differences appear in deeper analysis, similarity and vice versa (apparent similarity is based on deep conceptual differences). Alternatively, you can follow a concrete method of combining the two elements into a unified blending theory. (Click here to view sample statements on C & C Paper) Example English 200 Job Tips English 200: Outline of Literary Papers The third formal essay subject of this course is 1,500-1,800 words subject analysis papers. Description and purpose of the job The purpose of this document is to explain important themes, dominant images, repeated thoughts, or common concerns that appear in two different literary works. The assignment obviously has comparative and contrast elements in this article as you will require you to select two texts (by two different authors) from this semester reading. But this is not a "comparative" thesis. The actual conclusion is that "work A does this and work B does it." Your goal is to support key elements of work and programs. Interpretation Methods treated by two different authors The second big assignment we assigned was that we were ready for our third research topic. The purpose of annotated bibliography and research plans is to present urgent topics by reading various arguments and writing articles. Under the definition of Dictionary.com, Exigence defines "cases or situations that require immediate response or remedial actions, emergencies:" Hayes defines emergency sentiment as open subject with many opinions .

Dante's Inferno Kant V's Francesca's Dante's Inferno style is frankly beginning and ending. The terrible image of Minos' "recognizing" sneaky sinners and dispose of them to eternal punishment is in stark contrast to the almost family image of Francesca and Dante. Indeed, in hell, the confession seems to be defective or insufficient. People who announced that they had killed Minos had done this. They were forced to declare or express the nature of their crimes in their speech. Dante's Inferno's Kant V is clearly described as a hell of desire, but it is still enveloped in many mysteries. The most important people in Canto V are Francesca and Paolo, there are only two people to talk with pilgrims. Francesca talked, and Paul just cried (Inf. 139). Critic Lefleming questioned the words of Francesca in his essay "Sweet new subversion style of Francisska"; he thought Francesca would want to say that he was innocent. But Francesca's word is a strong desire warning, but it does not preclude her from her sin. By manipulating the words of Francesca, Dante provides evidence that desire is a fraudulent and dangerous crime. Dante's Inferno Kant V's Francesca's Dante's Inferno style is frankly beginning and ending. The terrible image of Minos' "recognizing" sneaky sinners and dispose of them to eternal punishment is in stark contrast to the almost family image of Francesca and Dante. Indeed, in hell, the confession seems to be defective or insufficient. People who claimed that their sins were murking were touched, they were too scary. In Canto III, Dante was warned by Karon to stay away from the dead soul. Dante fainted with this warning and a sudden earthquake. In Cant V, Dante heard about the tragic love story of Paul and Francesca, and designed for those who committed physical crimes, how they entered the circle of the second hell. Dante also sympathized and fainted. Dante is on lap seventh in hell A number of analytical articles on the fifth inner circumference circle of Dante included in the special letters of the fifth cant, Paolo and Francesca are written. The scholars of Dante debated the interpretation of this article, wrote out exaggerated detailed papers and discussed their views. What is the ring of desires that many educated scholars have evoked discussion? Thomas Bergin, author of several Dante analyzes, claims that Dante includes "all elements of this great poem" as the first Ordet to true hell.

Dostoevsky 's Underground Memorial Freedom In Dostoevsky' s Underground Memo, underground people proposed a concept of freedom of behavior completely different from Kant. Kant thinks that the agent can not act freely, but unless the action is taken for some reason, the underground staff seems to be in the opposite position. The only way to be truly autonomous is to reject the concept of freedom and to confirm the right to act. I do not have a reason. I assert that the concept of underground freedom is based on Kant because it requires self-awareness in decision making. In Existentialism from Dostoevsky to Sartre, Walter Kaufman wrote as follows. "I do not think there is a reason to call Dostoevsky as an existentialist, but the underground memo tells us," I will not mention Dostoevsky's "underground note" in this article, but on the movement of the ensemble and the way it is released I will explore. Existential tone note - the subject of existence in Dostoyevsky's "Karamazov brothers". Mainly through Ivan Karamazov. I am primarily based on the French philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre, but pay attention first to the basic idea and spirit of the existentialist thinker Soren Kelkegaard. I made readers understand the origin of existentialism and did this to compare Sartre's atheistic existentialism with the theological existentialism of Kierkegaard. Notes from the ground (Fyodor Mikhailovich Dostoevsky) 129 "Journal Epoch, memo from the basement", by Donstoevsky Konstantin Mochulsky: Flying over his life and work (1967) (Ken Kesey) "Raymond's" Grail Knight " Arrival beyond the wasteland M. Alderman (1972) Strange case of Jekyll and Haid (Robert Louis Stevenson) "Mask in the mirror: 18th century and 90s", "Separated Self: Perspective" Victorian literature (1969) 141 In this course, I met "underground notes" of Fyodor Dostoevsky for the first time. After two visits to Western Europe, he wrote in 1864 (two years before huge crime and punishment) while Dostoyevski was shocked and fascinated by the state of Western civilization. Although the narrator ("underground man") from the underground memo is not a modernist (especially Dostoevsky), despite accepting his contemporary wisdom (philosophy, aesthetics) his position remains unchanged. (Morality and science) leads this wisdom to a logical conclusion and a glimpse of absurd reasons and absurd reasons for modern life and thinking. This principle can be summarized by the reasonable philosopher Gottfried Leibniz with the word "nothing known by unfounded law".

In "Rock of Rape", Pope Alexander used this epic format to satire the British society of the 18th century. Belinda, the protagonist of the imitated epic, depicts women's duality as materialist and pure creatures. This socially determined duality shows a contradictory value. Belinda's duality showed the best performance at the end wash scene in Kant I. In this scene, she plays the magnificent hero ready to fight, but she is only ready for this day. Her fragrance will show off her beauty and religious beliefs as well as cosmetics and religious symbols. Praise to the main role of Pope Belinda's "Rape of Rape" in the Rape of the Pope can be regarded as a welcome and curse from the boss, but the complexity and sometimes contradictions of Belinda lit a more fair view I will. The advent of Belinda and the world she lives in are explained in a very fantastic and beautiful way. Even details like Belinda's hair arrangement result from a wonderful entity called Sylphs. Its only work is to make her look best. In "Rock of Rape", Pope Alexander used this epic format to satire the British society of the 18th century. Belinda, the protagonist of the imitated epic, depicts women's duality as materialist and pure creatures. This socially determined duality shows a contradictory value. Belinda's duality showed the best performance at the end wash scene in Kant I. In this scene, she plays the magnificent hero ready to fight, but she is only ready for this day. Her fragrance will show off her beauty and religious beliefs as well as cosmetics and religious symbols. In Kant III of Pope Alexander's "Rape of Rape", the Pope was talking about Belinda's director about less fighting epics. "Belinda is now a person aspiring to become famous, only the adventurous knight, / Ombre, decides their misfortune; and / and inflicts her breasts in future conquests" (III .25-8). The Pope gave Belinda the power to command the army to direct the fight between major players. If we regard this part as an example of women's power and control, we can not ignore the importance of what actually happens. The Pope does not believe that all women are stupid and can not fulfill their duties, but his overall view on women is negative in "Rape of Rape". Understanding of the characteristics of the Pope's female is greatly affected by social recognition. That is, women are inferior tools for men.

Art and aesthetic art are often called visual art, and one of the works is judged by the aesthetics of creation. However, art refers to all human efforts, including products of creative impulses. In other words, art does not have to be innovative in order to succeed. I believe that art is the spread of thought whether it is vision, music, communication or something else. Art is the interaction between the conscious and unconscious parts of our existence, the interaction between reality and illusion, which is always seeking connection with transcendence through color and form It is the voice of the soul. Aesthetics is a field of philosophy including beauty and appreciation of art, beauty and taste. Aesthetics is the core of artistic exploration. The term "aesthetic" comes from the Greek "aisthetikos" and means "aesthetic, sensitive or sensational." "In fact, the aesthetic judgment means sensual contemplation or appreciation (not necessarily a work of art) of an object, artistic judgment means recognition, appreciation or criticism of art work Manuel Kant, for beauty I believe that aesthetic experience is subjective but it is a universal judgment of human truth and everyone should agree that roses are beautiful.Michelangelo paintings of the Sistine Chapel are beautiful art It is widely known as a work. The American Association of Aesthetics was founded in 1942 and the Journal of Aesthetics and Art Critics published the latest research papers, special issue, and timely book reviews on aesthetics and art. In this regard, the term "aesthetics" is understood to include all artistic studies from philosophical, scientific or other theoretical point of view and related types of experience. "Art" is not only traditional forms such as music, literature, theater, painting, architecture, sculpture, dance, but also the traditional form of movies, photography, earthworking, performing arts, crafts, decorative arts, several electronic productions, Every aspect

Effective use of dialogue at Isaac's sacrifice In the brome version of Isaac's victimized version, the suspense created by emotionally excited dialogue may attract attention of the audience. The audience is very likely to know the whole story, but the emotional preference of the dialogue, such as the innocent expression at the beginning of Abraham's play and the innocent expression of Isaac, is certainly that personality We will give some attention to. This made the audience's predictions about the happy end of this story blurred. Francesca Stavrakopoulou speculates that the story may contain traces of Abraham's traditional Isaac's sacrifice. In the original E story, Abraham sacrificed Isaac, but the editor of JE added RAM to replace the line of Isaac. Likewise, Terence Fryheim wrote that this sentence does not clearly represent a debate over the child's sacrifice. By faith Abraham dedicated Isaac as a victim when God tried him. Those who accept these promises are going to sacrifice one of his sons, even if God told him. Abraham, God can raise the dead, figuratively, he withdrew Isaac from death. (Hebrews 11: 17-19) The Lord promised Abraham and Sarai in his later years. They cherish their miracle children Isaac. When God told Abraham to give Isaac to him, Abraham must make the most difficult decision in his life. This story is one of the greatest trials of God's obedience, faith, and trust found somewhere in the Bible. Abraham passed the test and reaffirmed the faith that God promised that he would become the father of many countries. G-D test Abraham's faith and tell Abraham to sacrifice his beloved son Isaac. Isaac is a 30 - year - old man at the moment. Abraham sacrificed Isaac, and when the G - D indicated the place of sacrifice, Abraham took Isaac to the place of G - D. On the street, Isaac asked his father, "I saw the fire and the tree, but where is the gift of the lamb burnt?" (7). Abraham replied: "God has offered a lamb personally for my son, a baked gift" (8) When Abraham killed his son with a knife, Isaac was bound in the forest, and Abraham I told him not to kill him. GD said to Abraham, "I will bless you, I will increase your descendants to the number of stars in the sky and the amount of coastal sand, and your descendants will have their enemy's gate" (17)) Then he lost respect for his son forever. Is essay.com/Abraham a respectable one? Controversy between Kant and Kirkegaard. Emmanuel Kant's "To lay the foundation of moral metaphysics" and Soren Kirkegaard's "Fear and tremor". (7 page paper) Is Abraham worthy? Controversy between Kant and Kirkegaard. Emmanuel Kant's "To lay the foundation of moral metaphysics" and Soren Kirkegaard's "Fear and tremor". (7 page paper)

I think that the reason will be determined by social mistakes. Generally speaking, when a person is unreasonable, he or she is inconsistent with "ordinary" or programmed to do things by everyone. Kant said: "Do you think that your motto should be a universal law?" 1 I think that universal legal theory that "rationality" is judged by universality, or to some extent I accept. All should be done. In fact, we know that primitive society is not based on reason. I think that we are inherently rational and irrational. There are two kinds freely. Freedom (negative freedom) and freedom (positive freedom). The division of freedom into this binary framework can be traced back to Kant, which he at least described in detail in his 1941 work "Escape from Freedom" at Isaiah Berlin's 1958 paper "Two Freedoms". It is known for concepts and explores Charles Taylor more modernly. These philosophers and thinkers often use these two different freedoms to discuss and discuss the role of government in civic life. But today, we would like to explore ways to think about the difference between freedom and freedom. It will help us to better understand our personal development and travel from boys to men. Freedom is the driving force of peace. Freedom of selection freedom of movement. Freedom of thought Free innovation You can freely talk and communicate. Our project aims to protect these liberties by widely disseminating friends and transferring ownership of technology to users themselves. This platform provides a tool choice for all users to use in every travel place. A tool to conceptualize ideas. They can build their own applications online and distribute them in seconds. You can communicate using powerful instant messaging and peer-to-peer video conferencing software that anyone on the Internet can use. They can do all of this on any computer with unpacking from all the devices, with internet connection This freedom comes with requirements. Freedom needs to contact the system that keeps it while recognizing that all companions do not like the freedom you enjoy. Sometimes, freedom needs voting, sometimes it needs to be promoted, sometimes it needs to be opposed, and sometimes it needs to be protested. In the response of last year, it is now even bigger and many Americans think this is an attack on our tribe. After all, we are a DNA tribe. Our tribal nature has helped us defeat furry mammoths and Nazis, and our tribal members turning our backs are deep individuals of our identity We are criticizing threateningly and threateningly. Therefore, we are aware of the fact that all social injustices began to defend the tribe loudly, and keeping silent about trying to weaken the voice that Kaepernick and other tribes can not recognize the most uncommon things watch. Synonyms of what he called "non-patriotic" and removed from tribes

Kierkegaards 'view of Kierkegaards' idea was a Danish philosopher in the mid-nineteenth century. As everyone knows, he is a father of existentialism at least 70 years ago in his era. At that time, Kierkegaard attacked Kant's rational morality and attacked Christianity. He asked us a question about how we understand faith. He said that faith is absurd. "Fear and tremor" shows an example of foolish faith, using the story of Abraham and his son Isaac. God asked Abraham to sacrifice his son Isaac's story and showed the theoretical confusion of morality and religion. Comparing Kierkegaard's view with Kant's view and knowledge method also helps to better understand the views of philosophers. For Kierkegaard it is not the reason of Kant to lead to faith, not to God. People can not make reasonable decisions about facts, evidence, and lack of conviction. Morality flourishes to the certainty of truth through reason. Religion can not have such luxury. This is not a rational decision but a belief. Kierkegaard refers to the transition from morality to the third stage, that is, "leap of faith". This paradox is an obvious and true discourse, but it leads to contradiction and intuition violation. It can be resolved only when inconsistencies are obvious. The story of Abraham of Kiakegaard is such a paradox. (Kerkegaard) For the Danish philosopher Soren Kierkegaard, the religious beliefs of Abraham are inconsistent and can not be reconciled. How does this belief drive someone to kill his only child? What is faith? Kierkegaard Abraham considers him to be a knight of true faith. Heroes who have undergone unfamiliar conflict and torture can only be examined with holy reverence and fear. When he enriched Noah's personality, it seems that Aronofsky read a page from Kierkegaard's book. The story of the Bible itself still has many drawbacks. What we really know about this person is that he is righteousness in God's eyes and (as not to forget) he began to curse one of his sons drunk after the flood . So what is justice? The basis of Aronofs talked about this in an interview and pointed out that justice is "a balance between justice and compassion." Justice and compassion ... The two features of God in the Old Testament seem to be contradictory but reveal many difficult clauses in the Old Testament. SørenKierkegaard is undoubtedly a profound religious thinker to be a father of existentialism. Like Tertullian's strong incompatibility, he proposed a clear belief and a reasonable perspective. If Kant claims religion only within reason, Kierkegaard will only require reasoning by religious restrictions. Faith requires a leap. Risk is necessary. All reasons come from proveing ​​that God's claim is actually a vicious circle. Hegel tried to argue that faith could be enhanced to objective certainty. In addition, Kierkegaard is seeking such a trap: it is extreme trust that is needed. The fundamental trust in faith is the highest level people can reach.

"Everything we know is beginning with sense, then understanding and ending with reason, there is nothing more than rationality" (Kant 1). The use of reason as a manifestation of my intellect is a common feature of the 21st century. Happiness, positive emotions tend to obscure people's judgment and force the consideration of relevance in making ethical decisions for philosophers. When considering the role of emotions in moral decision-making, we must take into consideration the comparison of the 18th Prussian philosopher Immanuel Kant, who concentrated his philosophy on rational doctrine. The latter is the opinion of the 19th century British philosopher John Stewart Mill. of According to the New Oxford American Dictionary, ethics is defined as "the moral principle of managing individual or collective behavior." Therefore, in an ideal world, ethics should play a final role in making decisions. Ideally all decisions should be based entirely on ethical norms if ethics is the principle that leads to human behavior. Unfortunately, this is not always the case. As a leader in particular, when a person tries to make ethical decisions, several problems arise. First of all, morality may mean different from person to person. For example, my religious beliefs and spiritual beliefs are the foundation of my belief in morality. But to others, ethics may be based on the understanding of laws or their own right or wrong. In general, I think there are moral or immoral ones in their actions. For example, most people understand that it is wrong to steal someone or kill him. Because there are so many examples in life, morality plays an important role in our decision as a human being. Ethical decision-making processes occur primarily when it directly affects people's conclusions, but what is morality? Random House - Webster Modern English Dictionary defines ethics as part of philosophy including values ​​related to human behavior. Includes correctness and error of behavior, as well as good and evil of motive and purpose. This clearly expresses what it means to make ethical decisions. Dalton Tucker Dave Madsen February 12, 2015 COMM 101 Ethics Report Ethics and personal values ​​play an important role in the media. All decisions that must be made involve ethical decisions. When you make a wrong decision, there may be many negative consequences. But there are four different philosophies that will help to make decisions easier. This article describes two different ethical cases and how philosophy affects the decisions. - In this course, this is a fun task for me. Because it brings good points to the ethics and values ​​I think are necessary for people to be excellent leaders. Since various people are participating in the list, it is possible to think why everyone can participate and visit the universe on this occasion. It is an honor to be able to visit such a magnificent place.

The existence of God is a controversial philosophical argument, and since the 'Enlightenment' era philosophers have been mystified. However, many of the various discussions presented and analyzed do not fully prove the existence of God. In order to move forward, we need to study the argument of failure in order not to repeat the failure. One of the arguments is an ontological argument. This discussion was first recorded by St. Anslem (1033-1109). Descartes adapted to this argument with his fifth meditation of "Contemplation of First Philosophy". First of all whenever thinking about a triangle, he decided that there must be certain attributes to make that shape a triangle. Criticism of the ontological argument began with Gauniro at the same time as St. Anselm. Perhaps the most famous criticism of ontological debate is due to Emmanuel Kant in his criticism of pure reason. Most notably, Kant argues that ontological arguments are at risk by implicit assumptions that "existence" is a predicate. But as Bertrand Russell said, it is easy to be confident that ontological arguments are less accurate than what they are doing. This will help explain why ontological discussions have captivated philosophers for nearly 1000 years. Some recent discussions on ontological arguments were placed on more weathering of discussion about God 's existence. Thus, for example, ontological arguments have been widely discussed in Everitt 2004, Sobel 2004, and Oppy 2006. The study of ontological theory by Sobel is typical. He provides a chapter on "classical ontological argument": criticisms of Anselm, Descartes, Spinoza and Kant's ontological argument; chapters on "Modern modal ontology argument": Hartshorne, Malcolm and Plantinga ; There is also a chapter on Gödel's ontological argument. His analysis is very cautious and uses many tools for modern philosophical logic. Ontological discussion is a philosophical argument on the existence of God using ontology. Many discussions are categorized into ontology categories and they tend to include discussion about the state or existence of the existence. More specifically, ontological discussions tend to begin with the a priori theory of cosmic organizations. If the organizational structure is true, that argument will provide reasons why God must exist. The first ontological argument in the West Christian tradition was proposed by Canterbury's national anthem in his 1078 Proslogion. Anselm defines God as "there is nothing more to think" and believes that this existence must exist in the mind even in the minds of those who deny the existence of God. He suggested that if there is the greatest possible presence in the heart, it must also exist in reality. If it exists only in the mind, a larger presence must be possible - the existence that exists in the thought and the reality

Plato's ambiguity for centuries, Plato has always been regarded as a writer, master of rhetoric, artist, and most importantly a philosopher. But Plato's sophistication and opposition to art brought confusion to his thoughts and beliefs. John Phakos plays about Plato, "[F] or most rhetoric plato always plays the same role he gave to his boss - enemy" (Nienkamp 1) Plato always skillful against rhetoric and art It seems like a rhetoric or an artist. & Lt; Tab / & gt; When addressing these issues, it is clear that Phaedo's page has no clear conclusion. One of the reasons is linguistic, chance of language, and ambiguity of Plato's own ideas. Should we consider the concept of shape as a hypothesis? This book has no answer. Conversely, when analyzing other works of Plato, we can resolve ambiguity by paying special attention to analysis of form related slopes and Greek manuscripts. Of course, this is beyond the obscure range of this article. The shape of Plato and how we look at them seems to be truly part of this material world, it will always be changing and will never change. According to Plato's formal theory, the substance itself is considered to be special. In the case of Plato, the form is more realistic than the object imitating them. The shape is eternal, but the physical form of the shape is constantly changing. If the form is unqualified, the physical object is qualified and conditional. According to Plato, shape is the essence of various things. A form is the quality of an object that needs to be treated as an object of that type. For example, there are countless chairs in the world, but "the shape of the chair" is the core of every chair. Plato believes that the formal world is beyond our own world, the material world which is the necessary foundation of reality. Kant calls it a rational idea of ​​God, the soul, and the world (the universe). By doing so, he misused Plato's word "idea" and changed its definition to ambiguity. Plato's idea is to generate a copy of the model or standard. Copy is a visible perceptual object. Kant's rational concept is not obtained by perceptual knowledge. They are almost impossible to understand through abstract conceptual knowledge. All cosmology should come from a hypothetical triangulation theory, therefore it should come from the principle of perfect rationality. Kant argues that splitting the whole into the last part is based on the principle of justification. This is because the last part is the basic condition and the whole should be the result. But Schopenhauer argues that separatability is based on the principle of contradiction. For him, part and the whole are actually one.

Ethical and ethical cloning of clones is the process of removing cells from the donor and placing them in the most nutritious culture dishes, stopping the division and switching their 'active genes'. Next, place the cells next to the unfertilized eggs. Nuclei are aspirated from eggs and leave empty egg cells containing all the cellular mechanisms necessary to produce embryos. Electric shock is used to fuse eggs and cells together. Next, the second shock simulates fertilization behavior and helps start the cell division. In this era, cloning is a big topic. This topic covers many moral and ethical issues. Cloning research has been conducted all over the world and has been done many times with animals and human beings. Why do you copy such confidential topics? Is it because people are afraid of modern Frankenstein? Or are they afraid of God's revenge? Are people on the planet confusing creation, or are they really helping the world? Personally, I think that cloning should be prohibited. And everything is for reasons. Cloning has proved to be dangerous in the scientific sense. The problem is that over 170 countries in the world have not yet banned human cloning studies even though the clones in the counties currently investigating are illegal. In this article I will explain how Kant's idea and ethics can help understand that cloning is moral and ethical in order to improve our lives. You must distinguish between the two. How human cloning helps medicine and society, and the importance of human value and dignity when applied to cloning. The morality of Chondron was proposed by Immanuel Kant in the critical writing of "The Moral of Mural Metaphysics". Kant said, "Because unreasonable things have only relative value as a means, they are called things. On the other hand, rational people are called people because of their nature reasons ... unless , Absolute value can not be found anywhere. " This article is aimed at exploring the scientific concept of clones. The focus is on the origins of clones, their importance, human clones, and moral, ethical and legal issues surrounding human clones. Paper further explores folk wisdom and pregnancy. Cloning usually means creating the same copy. According to Morrison E. Eileen, John F. Monagle (2008, p. 103), cloning in biological biology means creation of organisms, which is an accurate genetic copy of other organisms. Cloning is a process that creates copies of the same plants and animals as the original gene by asexuality and causes some interesting moral and ethical arguments. For years, clones have been used to produce more specific types of plants, such as the Macintosh Apple Tree, from all single mutant plants. But now, after discovering ways to create animals, even human clones, people are beginning to understand the benefits and consequences of cloning, and the relevant ethics.

President Wilson and President Woodrow Wilson of the 20th century were President of the early 20 th century and had many powers. He not only has extreme power in the United States but also makes important decisions based on his own personal beliefs and ideas that influence the world. President Wilson 's genius is related to human suffering. Wilson felt his role in the office was to serve the masses as much as possible. Contrary to the general belief, he is not "mentally ill like a machine", so many people make him a reality. Another important aspect of idealism is internationalism, which appeared in the work of the German philosopher Emmanuel Kant of the 19th century and was further developed by President Woodrow Wilson in the early 20th century. Kant's analysis is important as it attracts attention to the dominant and domestic structure's main role in promoting global order. In "permanent peace," Kant believes that peace among the nation states is best maintained through the informal union of the Republican system. Kant believes that the global community must concentrate on global power, but international structure alone is not enough to ensure international peace. If a fair world order is to be secured in the world, the state must be managed in a responsible manner, only if the system is based on limited constitutional authority. At the beginning of the 20th century, we came to call it a progressive era. President Theodore Roosevelt (President of 26), President William Taft (27th President) and President Woodrow Wilson (27th President) are progressive reformers who have devised many policies. Our country is still in compliance today. The first president of the progressive era was President Theodore Roosevelt and at that time his family and Americans preferred to call him "teddy." Since the beginning of the 20th century American politics has been dominated by Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson, the duel of the two president's super-personality and progress spirit defines the theme and condition of public life. Since 1920, Americans appeared enthusiastic about "ordinary". At Warren G. Harding, they got something to negotiate (and vote). Harding's highest quality is his superb compatibility and eye-catching beauty. They often confused him. From an early age, the president of the future seems to be pleasing everyone, leaning so as not to harm anyone. As a successful newspaper publisher, local politician, and later Senator of Ohio State, Harding joined the Rotary club, Elk, Od Research Fellow, Huhs, Redman, and Elk. He loves poker games and is good at speaking in front of people. He played B flat trumpet in the marching band of the town. Indeed, Warren Harding embodies Sinclair Lewis' Babbitt and is proud of it. Gilder Lehrman Institute of American History University Prerequisites American History Research Guide

Regarding recent events in Ukraine, international relations (IR) are also talked about again. However, there are not many people who understand the meaning of the term "international relations". Unlike what we normally see on television programs, it is not just to dispatch delegates to visit different countries or negotiate contested consensus. International relations, also called "world politics", began after the First World War. The focus of this field of academic research, as its name implies, is that politics at the global level is the maintenance of peace as a unit, national and inter-state relations, and international systems. In the field of international relations, there is a general theoretical or theoretical point of view. Realism, also called political realism, is an international political view emphasizing its competitiveness and conflict. It is in contrast to idealism and liberalism, which usually tend to emphasize cooperation. Realists believe that the protagonists of the international arena are states, care about their own safety, act for their own national interests, and fight for power. Realists stress that the negative aspects of power and self-interest are often skeptical about the relationship between ethics and state relations. Although national politics is the domain of authority and law, international politics is sometimes claimed to be an area without justice, but it is characterized by a positive or potential conflict between the nations. Theoretical perception of realistic pessimism and liberal international idealism. Rationalists believe that the state is not just a global system but an international community. The state is part of the international community by accepting various principles and systems and managing the way to manage diplomatic relations. By doing so, the state has made a commitment to the idea that it is not appropriate to promote national interests without considering international law and ethics. "British school" of international relations, also known as international society, liberal realism, rationalism or UK institutionalists, still has a "domestic society" at the international level despite the "disorderly" situation (Literally) lack of ruler or the world of the world) As Martin White did in the lectures of the London School of Economics in the 1950s, the extensive research of the British School was a reflection of the past international theoretical tradition Includes consideration. Hobbes (after Thomas) Hobbes), 2) Rationalists (or after Grotten, Hugo Grotius) 3) Revolutionists (or Kant, after Emanuel Kant). Roughly speaking, the UK school itself supports rationalist or Groatian traditions and is seeking an intermediate route (or through the media) between realistic "power politics" and revolutionary "utopianism" I will.

In Mill's utilitarianism, he explained the definition of happiness and misfortune with the principle of maximum happiness. The principle of maximum happiness is that if behavior promotes happiness action is reasonable and when promoting the opposite of happiness it is wrong. Happiness occurs when there are elements of happiness and lack of pain. The element of happiness itself is the ultimate one, the only thing is good. Happiness without a higher lifestyle creates happiness, so it will make up other events and experiences to a certain extent. The fundamental principles of John Mill's utilitarianism and Emanuel Kant's moral metaphysics suggest different views of the two philosophers about the field of moral philosophy. Compared to Kant 's metaphysical segmentation and its use in proof of validity and error, Mill' s utilitarianism is a more sophisticated ethical theory. Kant takes his confirmation of metaphysical survival as discipline of his moral philosophy. If the law has moral power it will be the foundation. Explain what is utilitarian utilitarianism. What kind of procedures should Utilitarians take when determining a series of actions? What is the difference between Million's Utilitarianism and Bentham? Why does Mill act according to utilitarianism? Next, I will explain how to think Kant's criticism against Mill as a utilitarian. Finally, I will evaluate the credibility of this criticism. Eat factory - meat on farm. Explain the main argument of Alasdair Norcross on why it is morally wrong to eat meat on the factory farm. Then explain what Kant is based on this argument, what Epicurean is based for this argument, and how Norcross reacts to them. Evaluate next: what do you agree with (if any) and why? Do you think that it is ethically acceptable to eat meat raised in the factory? Mill is considered to be one of the great classics of Utilitarianism, but this moral theory deviates from the central characteristics of many philosophers thought by modern philosophers. This explains why Mueller is a more serious practical problem than the initial inspection (see Coope 1998). The problem was caused by an understanding of Utilitarian era error and may reply that abandoning a philosopher who blamed the modern philosophy for the 19th century would disappear. However, this correspondence simplifies the problem too much. It is not clear whether Mill's theory of value has truly hedonism (see Brink 1992). As mentioned above, Mill thinks hedonism is a distinguishing feature of Utilitarianism; if he is not a hedonicist he will not have utilitarianism according to his own definition.

Proof of the outside world of Moore In his "proof of the outside world" Moore proposed several supporting hypotheses about the nature of things outside self. Moore mainly discusses hands; his argument is that both hands must logically exist if he can produce two hands. In addition, Moore's theory is that if there is only hands, it is proof of the outside world. Contrary to Moore's view, three main arguments will be discovered: firstly, all evidence of Moore is based on sensory input, and then the truth of other fact-based facts is problem It constitutes an epistemological circle of. I examined some responses to the skeptical challenges presented in Part 2. In particular, we saw four answers: (1) Descartes Cogito, (2) GE. "Proof" to Moore's outside world, (3) Dretsk denies cognitive closure, and (4) David Lewis's contextualism. After considering the strengths and weaknesses of these proposed solutions, we review the question whether skepticism is so bad or not and draw a conclusion. This course concludes with a discussion of why we have the concept of knowledge. If there is no concept of knowledge we are accustomed to, what kind of life will it be? Does this gap in our cognitive economy affect widespread or is our life as generic as that? In order to better understand if the concept is important or important, we will consider what kind of life can exist without knowledge of knowledge. Moore 's "evidence of the outside world" was created for the purpose of the soul, aimed at solving the "philosophical scandal" of Immanuel Kant. Obviously not enough for Kant and other philosophers. I believe the belief he said is true common sense, I believe in existence, and many other examples of congenital knowledge.

Along with the beginning of the American colonial era of 1776, the tension with King George III of England may reach the highest ever. Americans are dissatisfied with the behavior of overseas rulers. Because of their taxation and trade restrictions, British and mercenary soldiers occupied their city. Lexington, Concorde and Bunker Hill also have fights. Along with the development of the United States, England has become more nervous about its control, and several voices are beginning to rise about independence. The biggest and most convincing thing is Thomas Paine living in Britain-born Philadelphia. His booklet "common sense" expresses American independence in an unprecedented way. Abstract: This article will do three things. First, I analyzed the general common sense structure of criticism and decided the normative power behind various critiques. Secondly, this analysis shows that raising questions in the theory of some behavioral reasons, calling it a moral anti-rationalism, that moral reasons are not necessarily the reasons for all actors to take action To argue. In particular, this dilemma focuses on moral anti - rationalism that captures moral criticism and its common normative concepts of potential normative power. Finally, although the strong interpretation of my moral criticism is consistent with the moral anti-rationalism promises, denying moral criticism is quite different from other types of criticism. I regard this problem as a good reason for considering alternative analysis. In the first part, Kant from commonsense morality to the highest moral principle, he called an absolute command. Kant not only analyzes commonsense concepts such as "goodness", "duty", "moral value" but also the obvious premise of our common agreement ethics is the best moral principle, absolute order I believe it will produce. Kant's argument in the first part can be roughly divided into four parts. (1) Goodwill (2) Objective Discussion. (3) Three propositions on responsibility and (4) Absolute order

Without a strong government, it is realistic that our original natural state becomes violence and selfishness, but there is evidence of equality in the presence of equality. Another central way of thinking is human rights. This is similar to Kant 's personal instruction "to treat everyone as my purpose, not just a means." Human rights are synonymous with natural rights, but natural rights are based on nature, which is the actual product of moral, social and political consensus contained in public documents to establish a decent life for all people Only exist. . The main purpose of this paper is to study the view on Kant's punishment, which is related to the central idea of ​​his moral philosophy, especially the absolute command, the concept of justice and equality. Kant 's view of the punishment can not be separated separately from other ethical and political views. Because this is influenced by the most powerful and attractive idea making his whole ethic theory a problem of philosophical interests, his view on punishment seems more interesting than they think . The harsh retributiveism on the surface of these texts is a reflection of the deeper objective theme, the benefits of antisocial behavior to protect our rights, and the influence of the moral objective theory of respecting human perception I am receiving. "The principle of punishment is an absolute command." University of Nebraska Nelson T. Potter Jr. - Lincoln, kjohnson 6 @ unl.edu This article examines the central idea of ​​his original utilitarianism, but the last two sections of the article relate to the reasons of freedom and punishment of the will that can be found in the logic system (1843) and Sir William test Focus on Mueller's view. Hamilton 's philosophy (1865). John Stuart Mill is an educator of James Mill, his father, a close friend to Jeremy Bentham who was in contact earlier in his life. Utilitarianism In his autobiography, he insisted on introducing the term "Utilitarianism" to English at the age of 16. Muller was a Utilitarian in his life. Since the 1930s he has criticized more and more what he calls Bentham's "anthropology". Two articles, Bentham's Philosophical Review (1833) and Bentham (1838), are his first important contributions to the development of utilitarianism.

It is often confused, but the effect and effect have different meanings. The impact is mainly used as a verb, its main meaning is "to make an impact or make a difference" as in the following example. On the other hand, the effect is used as both a noun and a verb, but it is often used as a noun. As a noun it means "result or influence" as follows. When used as an effect of a verb, it means "bring something". In contrast to everyday English, it is most often used in formal context. The important thing to remember is that the effect is used most often as a noun and the emotion is used as a verb. Effect and effect are easy to confuse. This is a short version of how to use effects and effects. The effect is a normal verb, meaning influence and change. The effect is usually a noun, the effect is the result of the change. Be careful! Certain circumstances and formatting phrases can compromise the general usage rules of these words. Since the foundation is gone, let's learn how to use the complexity of emotions and effects effectively. Still emotional? If you are lucky, that might be both. (Because of curiosity, effectiveness means success in this context, grammatically, success is the goal.) Influence / Impact Conflict The verb you desire may be influence, which means the impact ("The Iranian hostage crisis affected the presidential election in 1980"). The effect as a verb means causing or causing the existence (effect change). The effect as a noun means a result or a consequence ("Iranian hostage crisis will affect the election ..."). Everyday / every day is confusing. As an adjective, every day (word) means everyday. If you want to say what happened everyday, you need two words: an adjective and a noun. Please note the difference between these two statements. "Kant is known every day at the same time with the same constitution, for Kant, exercise and thinking are daily activities.

As everyone knows, the first impression is a permanent impression. As this sentence says, when reading between seemingly innocent stories of someone they may become completely different people. This exact phenomenon is portrayed in Inferno's Canto 5. Kant 5 brings us to the loop of the second hell, a ring of soul filled with desire, we met Francesca and Paolo. These two sinners tell Dante through their tears the story of sad love and treachery. A woman who tells a story, Francesca, is not because of what she did but he seems very pathetic and sad because he is in hell. Dante's Inferno's Cant V Dante's Inferno, as part of God's comedy, Kant V introduced torture of hell on lap two. Here, Minos tells mind that they will wrap their tails around themselves. The second inner ring has desires and people who commit crimes. They were punished by infinite storms in the dark, and the storms hit them. Hell is not only a geographical place but also a representative of the possibility of evil and evil of all human souls. Dante's Inferno's Kant V is clearly described as a hell of desire, but it is still enveloped in many mysteries. The most important people in Canto V are Francesca and Paolo, there are only two people to talk with pilgrims. Francesca talked, and Paul just cried (Inf. 139). Critic Lefleming questioned the words of Francesca in his essay "Sweet new subversion style of Francisska"; he thought Francesca would want to say that he was innocent. But Francesca's word is a strong desire warning, but it does not preclude her from her sin. By manipulating the words of Francesca, Dante provides evidence that desire is a fraudulent and dangerous crime. According to my opinion, Dante's most interesting circle of Inferno is the second lap. This ring is explained by Canto V and is the circle of people who commit evil of meat and desire. The soul belonging to the second ring is the soul of sin that commits love and adultery. This makes Inferno's Canto V even fun. Even though it is a sinful love, it means that only Inferno points to love. This is enough for the reader to express sympathy to the sinners in the circle. Dante himself did not express sympathy for the sinners trapped there. In each Inferno circle, Dante tries to recognize some sinners. Interestingly, he is here to integrate Cleopatra's Helen and Troy. They belong to ancient times, the first belongs to ancient history, and the second belongs to ancient myths. Dante confuses fictitious figures with real historical figures and mixes them with his contemporaries. Finally, because they fainted, Dante expressed sorrow for their faith.

As composers and performers, there is no doubt the definition of Mozart's genius and genius. The main definition is that genius is very big, rare natural ability and skill. This is a kind of creativity. Therefore, it is obvious that Mozart is indeed a genius of his music; · Since Amadeus Mozart turned out to be foolish, however, in what state, anywhere, also obvious God Need to have the character and behavior of a genius, a dirty, childish, "baby" person. Being a genius on one aspect of the mind like music may mean that the rest of the mind is suppressed like social skills. In the philosophy of Immanuel Kant, a genius is the ability to independently understand and understand the concepts others have to teach. For Kant, originality is an essential feature of genius. This genius is a creative talent and can be described as non imitation. Kant 's debate on genius' main function involved "Criticism of the trial", welcomed the early 19 th century romanticism. Also, theoretical and genius Schopenhauer's theory about personnel, especially from direct constraints from cant, determine the first paragraph of section criticism. In the philosophy of David Hume, the way society perceives genius resembles the way society recognizes ignorance. Hume said that people with genius characteristics are regarded as people who are not touched by people working at remote locations from society and other parts of the world. On the other hand, it alone is not a natural genius in the scientific era of the country where ignorant people are further insults, prosperity and what is not considered a reliable sign, but in the complete lack of all these noble noble entertainment Jinjin I will not go. The most perfect role must be somewhere between these two extremes; exquisite courtesy letters generated in conversation with retention insight; books, corporate and commercial equivalent ability and taste Maintaining, to business, is the obvious consequence of justice philosophy Accuracy and accuracy If you believe that performance is a genius, we will always recognize them as endings. As a sign of genius, the level works as a forehead with a rubber stamp and tells people what they can do. This grading is a symptom of conveyor belt education, quality control inspector regards the product as inappropriate product. Ignatius J Reilly identified a persecuted genius position. The same can be said to the agitator who is still fighting and the privilege classes and media forces behind it. For all savage foolish all are allies with them. Although concern about the needs of all parties dismissed in this process, it is felt that Keelly, Shanise and Doug can not mobilize their common base. In black life, so-called white garbage becomes commitment toxic exhaust gas of the United States, it is instructed to follow the United States again, it will remain in dangerous condition

Age of Enlightenment is also known as "Rational Age" in Europe from the 17th century to the 18th century. This is an exercise to emphasize the use of reason and science in the world. In addition, it is to inspire and clarify the use of factual reasoning and to promote the use of evidence in doing things. Philosophers of the time and famous philosophers of the time, such as Voltaire, Diderot, D'Alembert, Descartes, Montesquieu etc, began to understand and promote inference beyond traditional ways. 59 The age of enlightenment is also called era of reason and refers to the time to lead the movement of ideology called enlightenment. During enlightenment, people insisted rationality as a means of establishing authoritative aesthetics, ethics, government and even religion. Some people believe that the reasons allow people to get an objective truth about reality - <http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Age_of_Enlightenment> (May 5, 2010 Day access). It can be said that 60 Hobbes, Rock and Rousseau between them made the most important contribution to the development of liberalism by announcing some pioneering work on liberalism. These works are J Rousseau Social Contract, two articles on citizen's government by T Hobbes Leviathan, J Locke. Later philosophers such as Kant and Rawls further developed these views. The focus is different from philosophers and philosophers, but the central idea of ​​social contract remains unchanged. Many critical thinkers believed that religion and reason are hostile in the age of enlightenment in the 17th and 18th centuries. For them, the Middle Ages or the "era of faith" is therefore the opposite of the era of reason. Kant and Voltaire were attacking the Middle Ages as an era of religious decline, and Jimbo in the "History of the decline and decline of the Roman Empire" expressed their contempt for "garbage in the dark ages". But like Petrarch, he saw himself at the cutting edge of the "new era" and criticized it for centuries before his own time, as was the enlightenment writer . The enlightenment of French literature in the era of intelligent era and rationalism is the period after the classical era of France in the 1700s. During this time philosophers have focused on rationality as the best way to learn. It explores education, law philosophy and political issues. It attacks tyranny, social injustice, superstition, and ignorance. In this time, progress has been made in the fields of anatomy, astronomy, chemistry, mathematics and physics. - French Neoclassicalism In the 17th century, the era of the King Louis XIV, we saw the era of neoclassical ideals, the three largest masters of France, Corneille, Racine and Molière. With the decline of the religious play in the middle of the 16th century, French play slowly developed. The French Renaissance began in 1630 and ended in 1700

The main character should answer the telephone and call Campbell at "the first threshold intersection" (28). The intersection of the first threshold is symbolized in character selection to leave the presence state and enter a new unknown state. Selection by character must help break Threshold Keeper (64) in some way. This is a symbolic representation of the process that the hero prevents "from knowing to unknown" (67). An example of a form in which parents can incorporate into Victorian works is to restrict gender roles and limit women's freedom as individuals. The freedom in the true sense is the independence of choice (Willkür), not the necessity of emotional impulses. Since it is influenced by pathology (by movement of sensitivity), the power of choice is prudent, if pathologically necessary it is called brutality of arbitration. The power of human choice is certainly the sensitivity of a kind of arbitration, but it is freedom, not cruel. Sensitivity does not require action, but human beings need to self-determine their abilities independently of sensitive impulses. (CPR A 534 / B 562) Rational human condition 3, deep freedom and reality people: metaphysical studies, Section 3.2 - Kant's free biology theory In modern Kande / Frankfurt 's desire criteria model, Willkür, or the power of a human choice / wise will, is an effective primary desire, or primary reason, will, or a practical reason (whether impure ) / Musical instruments and pure / non-instrumental music is the second will. The power of choice is effectively oriented toward one or more goals, and satisfaction of desire creates joy or psychological pleasure. In other words, the actual reason is to recognize the objective value of these goals. It is useful for practical reasons when it recognizes that it is ultimately a means of creating happiness. It is not beneficial when the actual reason responds to its purpose for its own benefit. Therefore, the actual reason is that the voluntary response to the rationality of the agent is inherited from the structure of the reasonable human will itself, leading the agent to take intentional actions. Reasonable human condition 3, deep freedom and real people: metaphysical studies, Section 3.3 - Practice - Freedom of Life: Kant non-intellectualism The practical reason for human being is to be able to exercise the choice of relative or absolutely spontaneous, instrumental or non-instrumental principle that we live, and Selbstzufriedenheit is able to exercise this ability partly or completely It is a subjective experience to achieve. In these respects, the unreality in the sense of Kant, or the moral opposition of Selbstzufriedenheit, as if you were just a Dalek, as if you were just a natural automatic machine or machine Like the British long-term television science fiction series Dr. - It is completely determined by the causal relationship of nature, there is no practical freedom to live. In other words, the unreality in the sense of Kant is your own self-denial of actual freedom. Reasonable human condition 3, deep freedom and true personality: metaphysical research, Section 3.4 - rationality of the mind: principle credibility, and section 3.5 - conclusion

Most people are not confused about their existence because they have neither witnessed nor experienced God. In Western theology there are three theories to prove the existence of God. These theories are ontological arguments, cosmological arguments, and objective arguments. St. Anselm in the 11th century and Descartes in the 17th century used ontology arguments to prove the existence of God. For them, God is supreme, "He does not need anything but needs all being and happiness" (PG. Exploration of ontological arguments For about 1000 years, ontological arguments have attracted the attention of philosophers. The order of ontology arguments from thinking to reality is revolutionary. This is an argument that does not actually require a corresponding experiment and does not require empirical data for operation. - Early elements of cosmological argument were developed by world famous philosophers Plato and Aristotle between 400 and 200 BC. The medieval philosopher St. Thomas Aquinas extended their thoughts when writing "five ways" in the latter half of the 13 th century. Since that time, cosmological arguments have become one of the most widely accepted and critical arguments against the existence of God. Immanuel Kant gives the traditional definition of ontological debate. He contrasts ontological arguments (indeed any discussion related to existence) to cosmological and physiological theoretical arguments. According to Kant, the ontological debate is an argument based on a priori reasoning. Graham Oppy defines the ontology as "the sole prerequisite of analysis, a priori and necessity" and "existence of God" that Graham Oppy thinks "there is no urgent reason to deviate from the traditional definition" It draws the view that it draws out the conclusions of. However, Oppy acknowledges that not all "ontological features" (analytical, necessity, priority) of ontology arguments are present in all ontology arguments. The definition of an ontological argument that "proposed a better point" would only take into account the consideration "within the scope of a perfect theological view of the theory". An argument about the existence argument argument argument of God is an a priori argument. These arguments try to prove the existence of God from the meaning of the word God. Anselm of Canterbury introduced an ontological argument to his work 'Proslogion'. The classic argument of Anselm is based on two principles, the most important of which are St. Anselm and Rene de Carte of the above Canterbury. - Cosmological argument tries to prove the existence of God by showing that there are no myriad reasons for the existence of objects. It states that everything must have the last unresolved cause. The reason for this unknown reason is declared to be God. Such discussion is believed to be the reason for understanding us and the existence of the universe. There are several forms of cosmological argument, but basically it is as follows.

Please read some important summary of purely reasonable criticism: (1) I can not find an object in criticism (the real thing is also called thing - 'Pioneer' like Husserl ' Because Kant argues that these objects have the same name used in commonsense words to identify things (2) because of the lack of these things , There is no relationship between things and empirical objects But purely reasonable criticism should not be understood as a ruin of a reasonable cognitive role. Kant wants to definitely define the boundary of reason, but this is different from the argument that it does not work with our knowledge. (§ 1.1) It is important to evaluate the relationship between rationality and empirical truth, (§ 1.2) the role of reason in scientific exploration, and (§1.3) the positive benefits of rational restrictions. In addition, reasonable philosophical reasoning requires reasonable access to its own knowledge - the first important but unfinished work (§ 1.4) Criticism of Emmanuel Kant's pure reason Emmanuel Kant's "critique of pure reasons" is mainly considered as one of the most influential philosophical texts of history. Kant's text is one of the most important books for those interested in philosophy by exploring their knowledge and reasons, their scope and limitations, their perception of space and time. Upton Sinclair's Jungle. Upton Sinclair began writing a novel about American immigrant life in the early 20th century, but it emphasized the unsanitary custom of the meat processing industry, so the jungle eventually became more popular. Sinclair makes a great contribution to the reform of the US Meat Testing Law, by drawing countless healthful breaches and stories about unjust treatment and remuneration for migrant workers. Over time, he gained more recognition by influencing standardized wages. To take a leading edge, I took another step. In addition to reading his most influential works such as "critique of pure reason" Kant's early work, written before he became famous. . It was when I was reading one of the earlier works that I found a man named Marquise Du Châtelet. It hampered my pursuit. At the time people were able to accept the philosophy education of the whole university without reading a single text written by women. In fact, people can take more than a dozen courses without listening to the name of the female mentioned. So, I read Kant's long explanation about Mrs. Duchat's work, and I was shocked. Who is this French woman, apparently a kind of aristocrat, Kant is discussing this issue? But sooner, a more irritable idea overcame me: why did not my teacher mention DuChâtelet? In this regard, why have not you mentioned women who have published philosophical work from the 17th century to the 18th century?

Transcendental philosophers need special enlightenment to enter the classics of transcendental philosophy (Kant's "criticism", Descartes' metaphysics "and Fichte's" scientific doctrine "). Three kinds of transcendental thinking are fused, rational autonomy is regarded as the ultimate foundation of defense. Therefore, the philosophical education of all three philosophers focuses on how to grasp and make available highly intelligent (or active self decision) of intelligence and survival. The modern transcendental philosophy was developed by a German philosopher Harald Holtz in a holistic approach. Holz freed the transcendence from the fusion of the new cantanism and critically discussed the transcendental pragmatism and the transcendental philosophy, the relationship between the new empiricism and the so-called postmodern. In everyday languages, "transcend" means "transcendence", "self transcendism" means transcending the form or state before you. This mysterious experience is considered to be a state of transcendental self transcendence, in particular, self recognition is abandoned there. "Self transcending" is psychologically measurable, is considered (at least in part) genetic, and has been included in the temperament and personality list as a personality dimension. Dean Haymer explained this finding with the book "Genes of God", but this was criticized by critics like Carl Jimmer. Transcendence is born from "romanticism in England and Germany, John Gottfried Herder and Friedrich Schliermach's biblical criticism, David Hume's skepticism", Emmanuel Kant and German idealism. Philosophy of transcendental theory. Miller and Versluis believe that Emanuel Swedenborg has a universal influence on transcendentalism. It is also strongly influenced by spiritual and spiritual philosophy, in particular Hindu texts on Upanishad. Transcendentalism is closely related to monotheism, the main religious movement in Boston in the early 19th century. After Henry Weir was elected Professor of Hollis theology in 1805 and John Thornton Kirkland was elected President in 1810, after acquiring monotheism at Harvard University, it began to develop. Transcendentalism is not a rejection of monotheism but rather an organic result of a monotheist emphasizing the value of free conscience and intellectual rationality. Transcendentalism is based on the transcendental philosophy of German idealism, seen as a substitute for the rock style "spiritism" of God's church by New England intellectuals in the early 19th century. They want to establish their religion and philosophy through transcendental principles. Thus, they can not achieve through perceptual experience, whether they are not based on sensory experience, but rather using the principles that are achieved from the human inner, spiritual or spiritual nature It means. Immanuel Kant said, "All knowledge transcendence is not about things, but about the knowledge patterns of ours." Since the transcendentalists were basically inspired by the German philosophy of the original text, they relied primarily on the works of Thomas Carlyle, Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Victor cousin, and Germaine Starr. In stark contrast to the philosophy that the transcendentalists do not know, they are very familiar with the English romanticism.

On the Possibility of Transcendental Materialism: The purpose of this speech is to discuss the following discussion: (1) Concept of transcendence is related to not only idealism but also materialism; (2) Karl Marx The theory makes this relationship possible (3) The theory has always been related to the political movement until Marxism develops, but this is social ethics itself and should be more properly called Marxism, so the principle It is a mistake. A brief comment on the term "transcendental idealism" is in order. When Kant wants to emphasize that something is a condition of empirical possibility, it usually uses the term "transcendence". Thus, for example, the concept of chapters entitled "A priori analysis of concepts" does not have these concepts and object recognition will not be possible. Kant means that the subject of experience depends on the mind, using the term "idealism" (although the exact meaning of this psychological dependence is controversial, see paragraph 2 d 2 ). Therefore, transcendental idealism is a theory that is a condition of empirical possibilities, empirical objects depend on the soul in a sense. Transcendentalism is a philosophical system that emphasizes experience and intuition and spirit of matter. Transcendence was published in "Walden" magazine by Henry David Thoreau. Thoreau mentioned the three main points of transcendentalism: think about simplicity, return to nature, and necessity. "Simple, concise, succinct! I said, please let your things be two, three, not one hundred or a thousand." Here, Thoreau is the man to keep human events as far as possible I explained the simple idea of. They are small as they can not have anything beyond what they can handle. Thoreau expresses transcendence with simplicity and shows that people with a simple life may be taller than people who have too many things in society. "Count rather than million for one million, rather than save your thumbnails in your account." Walden or Woods, masterpiece of Henry Thoreau, shows the influence of transcendence on Thoreau's world view. Transcendentalism is a philosophy that asserts the superiority of the spirit of matter. Transcendental emphasizes not mundane happiness but mental growth and understanding. Thorough's transcendence emphasizes the importance of nature and its proximity to nature. He believes that nature is a metaphor for spiritual enlightenment. Therefore, walking in the forest is calling for spiritual enlightenment.

Also, the argument of the universe, known as the demonstration of the first factor, is more persuasive, but also because it is not one of the most commonly used one , One of the most important arguments for the existence of God. There must be all reasons to happen and all the first reasons must be God. Cosmology is an argument from the existence of the world and the universe to the existence of existence, allowing it to enter there and stay there. The argument of Kalam cosmology is a modern expression of the cosmological proof of the existence of God. It is named by William Lane Craig (William Lane Craig) of Kalam (Islamic medieval Schola) by his "Cerre Ermu's cosmology" (TheKalāmCosmologicalArgument, 1979). This argument is a transformation of the facilitator without being moved Aristotle 's mind. That is because Craig named Medieval Islamic Schola opposed the possibility of actual infinite existence, so the idea dates back to the philosophy of the 11th century Home Al Gazzari Emmanuel Kant argued against the use of "necessary existence" throughout the discussion of cosmology and therefore concluded that a necessary existence exists. Kant has an absolutely necessary process of existence in an attempt to prove the existence of nonexistent existence of the universe argument, abstract "impossible", (critic B 621) "absolutely incredible" I believed it. Kant pointed out that he is called "absolutely necessary existence" existence exists, there is a need to be contradictory to logically deny its existence. The only existence that meets this condition is the most real, or the best existence, including all perfect beings present. This concept is at the center of ontological argument (see ontology). Argument argument, although perfect being exists that is determined by that concept, there really is nothing that exists this way. One must start with the existence of Like ontology theory, cosmological theory is also known as the first factor argument and is a classical argument against the existence of God. But unlike the ontological debate, we conclude that God exists (with evidence) in a posteriori premise, as God is based on what is visible in the world and in the universe. It refers to the first reason behind the existence of the universe. Cosmology is based on unforeseen circumstances (depending on other matters) and points out that a situation exists due to something happening. In this discussion, it is also pointed out that things are present, but they do not exist and there are several reasons to be able to keep track of time. Time begins with the birth of the universe formed about 15 billion years ago.

40 oz of free '89 Vision 100 Wieght of Collie Weed = 5446 (This is my number) There are no prophets in adult book = All Babylonian stones needed = Badfish ball and chain Johnny Butt song = Big Salty tears = Boss DJ New article day = Burrito = Please caress me Chikami Tipo My tip with chick = Cisco child Crazy stupid DJ's Daccau Can not continue dancing cabanas (no DJ) = Dr. Rape Dr Woo Doin 'Time Doin' Time (A Cappella) Doin'Time (Bradley Edition) Doin'Time (Creepy Wonderness Remix) Doin'Time (Instrument) Doin'Time (Martial Arts Remix) Doin'Time (Fur Seed A Cappella Remix) = Doin 'Time (Snoop Dog Remix) Doin' Time (Snoop Dog Remix) Uptown Dub) Doin 'Time (Wyclef Instrumental Remix) = Doin' Time (Wyclef) Most people may just learn about Santeria from sublime songs of the same name, but that is not just lyrics. What is Santeria? Sometimes called Regla de Ocha, this is a religion where millions of people live in Mexico, Panama, America, Cuba and the Caribbean. It is a combination of Roman Catholic elements, Yoruba's African myth, and American tradition, developed from the slave trade in the Spanish Empire era. During the Marxist revolution in Cuba the colonial era and Castro needed to keep a secret, and it hindered the development of a formal central creed; to the contrary, Santeros and Santeras were in common rituals and ceremonies I participated. . Unlike other less well-known religions, which are considered strange, Santeria is internationally recognized - even the US Supreme Court An elegant country is also a praise song. For double identity. Please make it to triple. Escape from disasters Various designs and explanations are made for the core family. In fact, the height of the country is not a metaphor of homeland security. The sublime of the country is that you have never seen, or a glimpse of it. Regardless of whether you live in Wyoming's countryside or live in a Manhattan skyscraper, domestic sublimation expands rather than shrinking the world in some way when you give more to others and family members I guess. There are too many sublime things. Mathematics is sublime, dynamic is sublime, negative is sublime. Kant separates sublimation into mathematics and mechanics. Mathematical sublimation is an overwhelming experience; it is caused by objects that appear to be infinite. This is very confusing. Kant takes a pyramid as an example. Dynamic sublimation is an overwhelming power experience of objects that seems to have absolute power to us. maybe. There is also a highland in the country. What is sublimation of the state? A: I do not know. It is related to the security provided by the "known" epistemological category in the post-empire world. There is little imagination left over new applications and technologies. Let's break up if you think there is nothing to do anymore. It is related to consideration, consideration and support, and avoidance of sentiment. Learn how to ask your needs

You used words and defamation to destroy the opportunity to feel peace and happiness and to destroy happiness. Some people work out by fulfilling all of their basic needs that have a good relationship and a rather neat life. But they are jealous of people who look better, richer, and have bigger relationships. It is a waste of happiness. They make them feel depressed, and make the peace of mind indispensable. People who lack security are unhappy people. Depression can adversely affect people's thinking, behavior, and happiness. It seems likely. Imagine a happy person who is kicking a cat, a person who enjoys torture, or a serial killer, her courage to allow her to kidnap a child before sunlight. In this case, happiness, happiness, and courage will exacerbate behavior. Kant believes that this idea can be repeated for everything except one thing - goodwill. Goodwill is unconditional tenderness unlike the others, and goodwill is the only desire, not other attitudes, outcome or agent characteristics. Even Kant thought it sounded like a rather strange idea. So, how can he (and we) ensure that goodwill exists? Has serial killer been born, has grown? Even today, discussion about nature and cultivation is still in progress, and a lot of research has been done. You are having a happy childhood, but if you are killing genes you may just have the opportunity to live a normal adult life. This is a dangerous time bomb awaiting to happen if a potential killer is having a wrong genetic and terrible childhood. In the "Violence analysis" criminal scholar Adrian Rennes believes that both physiology and the environment can make a child cold-blooded killer. Potential characteristics of a murderer are male, resting heart rate, brain injury, and mother smoking and drinking during pregnancy, a child away from parents by 3 years of age, or not in contact with parents when young Includes children. . FBI analyst Jim Clement said, "genetics loaded guns, their character and psychology aimed at it, and their experience caused it."

Being a dental assistant may be very challenging in terms of posture and sitting posture. In the long run, there are several musculoskeletal disorders that may affect your work. Some are so serious, you may need to undergo surgery! I do not think I want it. Dental assistants mainly experienced pain in the neck and shoulders on the right, pain in the hands and fingers was the worst between the 1st and 2nd fingers. If you do not take care of it quickly, this pain can cause muscle imbalance, ischemia, nerve compression, or disc degeneration. I am about 15 people a day. Approximately five of these 15 people have pain in their shoulders and neck due to postural problems. The most common complaints of pain are pain in the deep of the arm, numbness and tingling (one side) of the hand, neck / arm pain sitting on the table for a long time, neck pain during exercise, and neck and arm It is pain. Many people are technicians who spend a lot of time working MacBook Pro daily. They work for a long time and have poor ergonomics. They are young, usually in their twenties and thirties The posture of the neck and upper body is the key to avoid long-term pain. Sitting at the same time as students, working with professional computers, cycling is also a very important element in avoiding neck and shoulder problems. Tilting the shoulder blades is the most common cause of tennis and cricket player's shoulder pain. Take your advice on your attitude from your physical therapist and let's do it on a regular basis There are few studies investigating risk factors of body / posture related to MSD of the neck and shoulders of medical professionals. Risk factors associated with neck and shoulder pain include placement of the body in an unwieldy posture requiring long-term maintenance. Through direct observation, Kant et al. [58] has a wide range of static posture, as well as operating room nurses who need surgeons to maintain instrument tension, resulting in excessive musculoskeletal in the head, neck, Pressure is found to occur. Weight lifting and bending are significantly related to medical staff 's arms and neck diseases [67], shoulder discomfort is associated with push - pull exercise 68,69 Injuries related to other occupational groups 70 -72 Evidence suggesting that MSD preventive interventions need to address physical / postural risk factors

Various forms of cosmological arguments on the cosmological argument of the existence of God are recognized arguments against the existence of God, which is also called the first argument. The basis of cosmology is the first reason the universe exists, this is God. It has taken many forms and has been presented in many ways in the past. Many philosophers are proposing such philosophers such as Plato, Aquinas, Socrates, Hume, Kant, their views. Like most arguments about the existence of God, cosmological arguments exist in many forms; here two are discussed: cosmological arguments of time, Kalam (ie the first argument), and division Discussion of style. The main difference between these two arguments is that they avoid the first opposition to the argument and cast the question "is there a reason for that existence in God?" Then suppose that God exists to explain the existence of the universe and we will not take us anywhere. Without God, we have an entity that we can not explain, there is a universe; there is an entity with God, we can not explain, that is God. Discussion that is most widely accepted and criticized about the existence of God. My purpose in this article is to explain why cosmological arguments are proof of the existence of God, to understand that it is the importance of posteriori posteriori discussion, and to my common argument It is to observe the position of. First of all, as a living person on earth, we can safely conclude that the majority of things that exist today have their cause. I confirmed that there is a reason. There are many arguments about the existence of God to try to prove the existence of God. In this article we will discuss ontological discussions, cosmological arguments, empirical discussions, such as avoiding errors and design arguments. There is much criticism about each of these, and the existence of God can not prove that it might be stronger than those who speak more strongly. The insisting definition of God is a god of Christianity ... I have found Akinas' theory that the existence of God is very interesting. It is easy to understand and logical. Summa Theologiae is one of the best works of Aquinas. St. Thomas is also a writer, writing a lot of comments on Aristotle and other theological and philosophical themes. Aquinas divides his argument into five ways to prove the existence of God. The first method is sports debate. There are many things that are changing, but not all of a sudden starts.

Both Plato and Nietzsche are great philosophers who formed the story of Western philosophy and were often designated as the opposite Plato set the beginning of the era of absolute truth and value. Plato's investigation of a complete society convinced him that knowledge and power must be blended in order to fully realize its possibilities. Certainly, every great philosopher seems to have his own wonderful concept. Plato has his formal theory and a cave fable; Kant suggests the problem itself and an absolute command; Nietzsche released Superman's (Superman) theory. But for Deleuze, the relationship between this concept and the philosopher is deeper. "A philosopher is a feature of his conceptual diagram, the fate of a philosopher is to become his conceptual diagram" (page 64, highlighting me)). In other words, Plato is his own shadow in the cave, or, as Druze said, there is "Socrates of Polato" or "Neon Dionysus". Essentially, a person is not just a philosopher's philosopher. True philosophers must live in their philosophy. Even though the actions of philosophers are in contrast to their own philosophy (as often happens), they must always occupy their minds. Both Plato and Nietzsche are great philosophers who formed the story of Western philosophy and were often designated as the opposite Plato set the beginning of the era of absolute truth and value. - Tennessee Williams's "Desire Streetcar" is exploring many of the important themes and problems in the book. The theme of Williams' audience survey and exploration is fantasy and fantasy. At the time, Plato and Nietzsche were the two most famous and most famous philosophers in the world. Plato's seminar is based on a series of speech about love, purpose, and existence. For each presentation, seven different people each representing a speech about love participate. Nietzsche's spoke like this Zarathustra is like a philosophical novel than a dialogue like Plato seminar. Nietzsche's writing is more about the purpose and a deep understanding of morality. Nietzsche talked about the human walk before reaching "Superman". Since "Superman" built his own values ​​and goals, Nietzsche then talked about "Superman" without any discrimination and morality (SparkNotes Editors, Summary)

Today's women have reduced gender disparity with men and defeated women at the time of going on to university (Francis) and have reduced the wage gap of American people by about 17 cents over the past 20 years (USA). . Despite the remarkable progress of women, the contraindications of sexual women and the concept of filthy women still exist. The role of gender and sexual behavior is a big contradiction in today's American politics. In Republican presidential campaign campaign, Rick Suntory said, "The United States is suffering from pornographic content (Friedersdorf)." He is a crusader who claims to have family value. Also in the text, "There are too many families with you. Porn transformed women into "adult toys." Feminist activist, journalist and female anti - porn (WAP) co - founder Susan Brownmiller wrote in 1975 as follows. "Erotic is theory, rape is an approach," Robin Morgan, a former editorial magazine editor, announced in 1977. Some people consider pornography to be a type of horror. A woman wrote in 1981 by the most famous anti-porn feminist supporter, "I know that we are free if pornography no longer exists." In 1996, Catharine McKinnon, a law scholar, opposed the idea that pornography is a creative practice with the right to receive protection of the first amendment. McKinnon wrote that pornography itself is not responsible for women of sexual assault, but "promoted by production, change, and pornography." Helen Longino was one of the first feminist philosophers who raised the theory that pornography harm women. She believes that pornography shows that men and women are happy about women's objectivity and the recognition of women as fewer humans. Pornography promotes the idea that by portraying women's subjects as inhumane targets, women can be treated without moral consideration (ie, without being raped and without being conquered). According to philosopher Emmanuel Conde, Lon Nono thinks sex is a moral problem. Even if it is not impossible, it is not a means of treating others as our own satisfaction purely. It is also very difficult to have sex in that situation. Sexual desire is irrational and leads to the reduction of others to the body part of the body. Therefore it is objective, inhuman, and corrupt. Ronttino adds a feminist element to Kant and believes that men can use women as a tool to satisfy sexual desire because men have more social skills than women.

Beauty of Mankind Charles Darwin wrote in his book "The Fall of Mankind" in 1872 as follows. Even if we apply for work, the appearance may be qualified We believe that attractive people are better. It is a common standard. In addition to the media our eyes have become accustomed to serving our brain everyday, there are many ways to see the beauty of human beings. Everyone has beauty. Maybe there are some elegant things in my hand. Probably there are unusual color stains in your eyes. It may be a beautiful symmetric or asymmetrical skeletal structure. It is a voice, a word, or a way people move. Whatever they differ from their beautiful concepts, they are all deformed by light, when they are shining the light inside the people, they are beautiful. We thought human beauty was hidden in our eyes. But people who think beautiful can be considered ugly. You can look for inner beauty through the way people present beautiful aura. It does not matter how beautiful a person is, but what matters is that he has a naturally beautiful aura. Kindness is part of kindness in peaceful nature, in some confidence and inner peace. In the face of an absolutely precise function, the beautiful appearance can be selfish, arrogant, critical, or arrogant; they often want to show their superiority. This superficial beauty never lasts forever. People get older and extrinsic features disappear Kant said only human beings can understand beauty. Darwin claims that the origin of the ability to pay attention (and understand it) to beauty is the same for animals and humans. However, he agrees that it contains cultural values ​​and traditions and that recognition of human beauty is far more complex than animals. He studied the custom of love in different cultures and confirmed that despite cultural differences, beauty plays equally important role in choosing a spouse. Sigmund Freud (1856-1939) agreed with Darwin on the origin and role of beauty in human life. In "Civilization and its dissatisfaction" (1930), Freud insists that beauty is derived from sex and that all forms of happiness are related to sex. Darwin and Freud believe that the function of beauty is universal, but the diversity of expression is consistent with cultural relativism. Tattoos are beautified in one culture and accused by another culture

what would you like. Very good, everyone uses words, but most people really do not know what really good concept is. what would you like. In my own understanding, I am good at causing moral and perceptually correct acts and statements not only from the eyes of others but also in our own eyes. Have a sense of accomplishment; When things work well, you will feel a sense of accomplishment. This feeling usually applies not only to individuals, but also to those who may benefit somewhat from their good deeds or statements. What a beautiful will it is. In order to explain what sincerity is, we need to explain the meaning of "good" and "will" that Kant said. "Good", first of all, is a practical concept. This means that it has the necessary relationship with action. Please think about the three positions and opinions of the world. In one position, we observe the world there to understand it. In another position, we are enjoying the influence on us or evaluating its beauty. In other situations, this is practical, we see the world to take action to achieve something, or to prevent something happening. "Weir" is a so-called spiritual teacher who is in a practical position. It is different from the ability to engage in other positions, understanding and feeling. A testament is a general ability that we consciously cause things to happen (or to prevent certain incidents occurring). Goodwill is our ability to think about (through the teachings of Zarathushtra) and refers to what we applied to the right job choice. The second teacher extended desire, to accept the truth of Zarathushtra information and to refer to the conscious desire to become an ashavan. The cultivation of this ability opens a process to identify good and evil. The third conscience, conscience, human beings can accept or refuse Ahura Mazda's revelation and work with sensible masters to start frashokereti. It is insight that is closely related, it is a sacred inspiration that Ahura Mazda gives to everyone who chooses to seek the truth. Finally, wisdom is the best teacher. In parallel with the understanding of Ahura Mazda, it includes a complete understanding of the universe.

The reasonable period of rationality is the period from Utrecht's Peace (1713) to the French Revolution of 1789. This is an era in which rationality basically replaces religion as a guide for art and thought. And the reign of men. Without a doubt, accepting the old social order and the ancient way of dominating the country has created a new important inquiry mind that requires a reasonable defense of the existing social system. The universal application of reason is believed to release Europe from the artificial, restrictive, fraudulent and superstitious heritage of the dark era. The enlightenment of French literature in the era of intelligent era and rationalism is the period after the classical era of France in the 1700s. During this time, philosophers will focus on rationality as the best way to learn. It explores education, law philosophy and political issues. It attacks tyranny, social injustice, superstition, and ignorance. In this time, progress has been made in the fields of anatomy, astronomy, chemistry, mathematics and physics. - French Neoclassicalism In the 17th century, the age of Louis XIV, Sun King witnessed the emergence of neoclassical ideals, the three largest masters of France, Corneille, Racine, Moliere. With the decline of the religious play in the middle of the 16th century, French play slowly developed. The French Renaissance began in 1630 and ended in 1700 Many critical thinkers believed that religion and reason are hostile in the age of enlightenment in the 17th and 18th centuries. For them, the Middle Ages or the "era of faith" is therefore the opposite of the era of reason. Kant and Voltaire were attacking the Middle Ages as an era of religious decline, and gibbons in the "history of decline and decline of the Roman Empire" expressed contempt for 'dark aged garbage'. But like Petrarch, he saw himself at the cutting edge of the "new era" and criticized it for centuries before his own time, as was the enlightenment writer .

Eleonore Stump wrote an article about the status of her prayers. The stub begins her argument by defining a prayer prayer as seeking something from God through prayer. Stubble pointed out that since this is the definition of prayer and prayer, prayers of praise and worship do not ask for it, but because they show loyalty it can not be regarded as a petition. Stumps answer Kant 's argument that God does the right thing, and whatever you ask for, that appeal is meaningless. In most cases, there are two types of prayer: goal-oriented prayer and non-goal-oriented prayer. Goal-oriented prayers are also called prayer prayers because of certain demands. The basis of prayer and prayer is traditional monotheism followed by Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. With this kind of prayer, people pray in our hearts. In most cases, prayer prayers emphasize people's selfishness and self. Furthermore, people tend to be apart from God if prayer can not get a response. Christian's petition prayer is when people seek differences under the name of Jesus and according to the teachings of the Bible. I think that the moment of prayer is "demand", and I understand now that my life in prayer has changed, it keeps me from praying in prayer or prayers you ask for It was. . I tend to be silent, I am trying to be with God. With this gift, my father is gone. I can not ask him any more. And I do not know if I will be there for years. My mother may help but I will still help. Sometimes I will accept; sometimes I will not accept it. But my father said, "I remember my son, I am waiting for you here, please tell me if you need help." I do not know if I believe her. I did not ask In other words, considering the strange situation of my prayers and prayers, especially the role of faith in this type of prayer, the common (and false) teachings of the various prosperous evangelical groups and people's pray The advantage is not the same as those who teach it. Teaching itself is the answer to that person's prayer based on the level of that person's faith (which may not be true teachings, but the meaning is the same). That is, if you can not answer a person's prayers, that person has insufficient confidence in your prayers. In other words, the problem is not God (at least not that he is willing to approve the request, but that he is incompetent as it requires higher faith to answer prayers).

In the field of philosophy, there are many answers to general questions, depending on the viewpoint of the subject of a particular philosopher. Usually, the answer is unspecified. In a broad sense, this word also appears in the dictionary. It can be said that it pursues human knowledge and human values. There are many different people who have many different knowledge theories. Two of them, and philosophers will drill down Descartes and Plato. Pondering the first philosophy validates Descartes' debate about the existence of God. The purpose of this paper is to explore Descartes' inference and proof of the existence of God. In the third meditation, Descartes presented two arguments to prove the existence of God, a trademark argument and a traditional cosmological argument. His claims are powerful and relatively realistic, but they do not prove the existence of God. At the beginning of meditation, Descartes began to refuse Rene de Carte is a French philosopher and is known for versions of trademark debate and ontological discussion. What is the theme of this book: contemplation of Descartes' first philosophy? 'This book was originally written in French from a gender-neutral talker's point of view. Below is a summary of important ideas in Descartes meditation. In the first part of Descartes meditation, he realized that nothing could be confirmed unless he was suspected. His doubts must start with doubts about himself. Descartes does not think that he does not exist, he believes the opposite is true. However, "suspicion" is a philosophical process and I doubt that it is a stage. Without a doubt, Descartes can cast doubt on the essence of his view. Consideration on "Descartes meditation - the theme of the first philosophical meditation" The contemplation of Rene Descartes' first philosophy is considered to be one of the most important works of modern philosophy. John Rock, Immanuel Kant, and numerous other philosophers have shown most of the reaction to Descartes. However, there is a serious doubt about the main argument of this paper. - Imagine your culture being thrown aside and new culture taught to you. How do you respond? In this story, the author, Jamaica Kinkade talks about her reaction to her and her experience. The writer grew up where British colonial rule took place. She grew up in a small island in the Caribbean, Antigua. She talked about England in her life, this is the place she has never seen before.

Reading Loren Coleman's blog "Cryptomundo", I use chores, follow the special defense without delay, actively confirm the state of prejudice used as evidence and justification of the cryptographic community. In many cases this will create an article that seems to be the boundary between generating website traffic and obscuring the zoological / biological discovery and valid "zoology" of encryption It is a practice to read. Everyone reading this blog knows what I think about the quality of Cryptomundo's material. But I love some Bigfoot monsters. A big foot aims at the story, a big foot hunter invades the forest overnight. I like propaganda that the Hunter screams "Oh, my God, what?" Problematic "things" are usually proven to be sandwiches brought by the mother of Bigfoot Hunter. In the climax of my favorite show, when his talker reached a dark conclusion, 'Sukwatch Hunter saw the picture with their fantasy camera trap: "One thing is obvious: Elk. Yes, you may not have read Philosopher Immanuel Kant who wrote that "the world itself is" unknown "by itself", reality must conform to the active concept of human thought " Hmm. In other words, everything goes through the perceptual filter and strengthens our own specific viewpoint. Can this explain the trace of a big foot? The simple answer is "No", not even a bit. Over the years, BFRO has collected thousands of observations related to big feet. None of the observations did not notice that witnesses found a person who thought they were big feet, but it turned out to be a long bear walking with his hind legs. If that accounts for a few large witnesses, then quite a few will happen. On the other hand, witnesses initially thought that a person like a fur stood upright till the car approached plaguing the hind legs. it is normal. Bigfoot's sights and footprints are often mischievous. Bigfoot scientists and believers agree that many sightings are mischievous or misidentify animals. Bigfoot has a weight of 500 pounds or more and is described in the report as a large Ranunculus creature with a height of 6 - 10 feet covered with dark brown or deep red hair Cruze. According to reports, Bigfoot claims that when it encounters it, there is a strong, unpleasant smell. Some also include nail traces, so it seems that some of them came from known animals like bears holding five toes and nails. All these so - called facts are told by everyone to assert that they are exposed to Bigfoot.

Morality and Utilitarianism in a deep moral situation Samuel Adams (1722-1803) was once a patriot and a politician in the United States. [1] This statement is important as it impairs the moral doctrine defended by Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) and John, based on two major ethical theories in philosophy, moral metaphysics. Utilitarianism is supported by Stuart Miller (1806). - 1873) "Utilitarianism" in his thesis (667). Utilitarianism is the principle of taking the right course of action to benefit most people. Morality is defined as the moral realm of responsibility, moral responsibility and responsibility. Both Utilitarianism and morals, despite the outcome, contain the ethics and results of human behavior and behavior. To compare Utilitarianism and morality, it is to make a right decision to put together Utilitarianism and to take the right action for the best number of individuals with the best results. Regardless of the effect on morality, morality is understanding and practice, respect for life, fairness and integrity, despite the outcome. Important differences in moral judgment include moral and Utilitarian decisions. Moral judgment is usually driven by an automatic or intuitive reaction motivated by the emotional content of a particular dilemma, but Utilitarian reactions are driven by a conscious evaluation of various potential outcomes It is the result of cruel or rational / controlled reaction. Thus, a moralist opinion will evaluate behavior based on its ethical or perhaps mere rules (such as law), while a utilitarian perspective will evaluate behavior based on its results. The two main categories of moral principles and ethical thinking are utilitarianism and morality. Morality is a school of moral thought, its means and ultimate goal must be moral and moral Utilitarian ethics school points out that even if the means is not moral, proves the rationality of the means . Autonomy and patient self-determination are also maintained when nurses accept clients as the only person with natural rights to own their own opinions, opinions, values, beliefs. The nurse advises the patient to make their own judgment without judging or enforcing the nurse. The patient has the right to refuse or accept all treatments

"Racial discrimination is a shelter for ignorance, it will divide and try to destroy, it is an enemy of freedom, welcomed and deserves to step down." . In our society, racial discrimination is everywhere, it always existed in our past. Racism is destroying our world, which is becoming tolerant. It affects not only one person but also all participants such as bystanders, victims, racists, and threatens our society. Other, in other words: racial discrimination. Racial discrimination leads to discrimination, oppression and death for countless people. Currently, racial discrimination is often closely related to stereotypes. In today's society, stereotypes often criticize you as "you are a racist." Racial stereotypes tend to draw their associated race in a negative way. However, the meanings of both are completely different, please do not confuse. It is important to understand the assumptions and motives behind racist psychology - stereotypes, and prejudice against racial discrimination and discrimination. Usually, we understand the basic structure of hatred. However, not all race discrimination comes from hatred. It is important to understand the basis of many racial prejudices and discrimination. Here is a general view. As philosopher Emmanuel Kant argues, the roots of bad behavior are deeply rooted in human nature. In some cases there is something that almost guarantees to ignore the moral law of treating others with equality and kindness. Regardless of whether it is pride, reliance on power, or other malignant tendencies, our moral tendency will always tend to decay. People are discriminated against skin color, country of origin, appearance, social position and moral beliefs. Racism is the main form of discrimination. There are many definitions of racial discrimination, but there are also prejudices, violence, discrimination, or suppression. Discrimination of this form is extremely hypocritical because everyone is different and there is no "excellent race". Because the United States is a country of very diverse people, it is often hypocritical to hate others or attack others by their country of origin.

Evidence of the existence of God, whether or not it is God. There is no room for maneuvering. Attempts to preserve the existence and neutrality of God automatically become synonyms of distrust. There is nothing wrong with God if there is one, but everything is not important if it does not exist, so this is far from the question "there is no practical meaning". If he exists, there is an eternal paradise (Hebrew 11: 16) and an eternal hell to be avoided (Revelation 21: 8). The issue of the existence of God is a very important matter. The opposite is elaborateness inherent in all "a priori" or ontological evidence of the existence of God, ie sophistication of Kant's return to all evidence of the existence of God. He considers the specific concept of God as essential at the beginning of the evidence of the existence of God, and such concepts include the concept of existence of God. Of course, Kant is correct, and since the beginning it proved that certain concepts of God are necessary; after all, the evidence is trying to prove something. However, in the sense of evidence, this concept is simply an indication that there is no contradiction between God and existence, in other words, in order to prove the necessary concepts, the concept of "God exists" It is only a proposition that only requires a predicate. Structure of possibility to combine. Obviously, there is no evidence against McCloskey 's existence against God' s existence. Considering that his argument asserted that the theologian provided evidence of existence, he did not prove that God did not exist. The existence of God is expected to have obvious evidence of the existence of theology to prove that his existence also implies him, and he seems to provide mysterious evidence of his argument You will be asked. From the evidence provided by theists it is clear that they complement each other and contradict each other. In the first discussion he disputes the existence of the creator and believes that it was replaced by evolution. Depending on the example being offered and everything that exists, there must be a first fact, but that may not be true. The reason can not be unlimited. In other words, there are independent reasons, it is not caused by another reason. H. J. McCloskey renamed assertion of the existence of God as simple "evidence". His argument is that evidence (such as ontologies and objective arguments) lacks clear evidence of the existence of God, so it should be dismissed. Generally speaking, technically, God can not clearly verify or prove with existing scientific methods. The general idea is that God transcends our intellectual ability. Therefore it is wrong for McCloskey to prove that it should be rejected. The idea that God is the best interpretation of origin and life is definitely the best way to start doctrinal and ontological debate. In the medical field, please consider the following example. End stage diseases such as AIDS and cancer deprive millions of lives each year. And so far, we have not succeeded in eradicating these diseases eventually by treatment to fight disease.

As I learned through course studies and lectures, due to my prejudice against Anselm 's ontological debate. I hope that Descartes aside these prejudices, present two articles on his "first meditation" to explore the two aspects of the discussion and try to reach independent conclusions. However, I would like to get the same conclusion as before - that is, ontological arguments can be argued based on fundamental differences between concepts of existence in our minds and concepts of reality I can do it. The ontological debate was first criticized by Gaunilo of Modern Marmoutiers of Canterbury Anselm. He believes that ontological arguments can be used to prove the existence of something using full island analogies. This discussion was also criticized by famous Catholic philosophers Thomas Aquinas, David Hume and Emmanuel Kant. In order to correctly understand ontological arguments, it is necessary to identify the meaning of philosophers when talking about 'possible world'. "Possible world" may refer to facts contrary to facts. For those in "a possible world", it simply means that its existence is logically possible. Perhaps the most complicated and challenging argument for the existence of God is an ontological argument proposed by Anselm of Canterbury. According to Anselm, God exists in God with the most perfect concept of existence - the existence which can not be imagined - because there are essentially perfect and nonexistent beings as large as existence. Everything is perfect, no one exists. This discussion has a lasting influence on philosophers; some believe it will try to 'define' the existence of God while others keep it and continue developing a new version I will. Ontological arguments are transcendental arguments. These arguments try to prove the existence of God from the meaning of the word God. Anselm of Canterbury introduced an ontological argument to his work 'Proslogion'. The classic argument of Anselm is based on two principles, the most important of which are St. Anselm and Rene de Carte of the above Canterbury. If he does not exist you can still think of a larger being (as you said that there is no God other than this existence). Presence must be one of the attributes of God. Because by removing it it is still possible for you to understand the bigger god (the god that exists). The most common problem with this discussion is that it only seems to enumerate the existence of God's attributes and does not seem to indicate it. This argument seems to indicate that any fact you can imagine should be true.

Goethe's first and most famous story work, "Sadness of young wit", captures the spirit of the birth of German romanticism beautifully. Beauty is indispensable to romanticism and Kant defines it as "purpose not purposeful". Aesthetic judgment is different from subjective or cognitive judgment, so Goethe had the same idea when writing. These aesthetic judgments involve experiencing things designed for emotions that they can invoke, not specific intentions. This phenomenon, known as the Witt effect, was named after the hero of John Wolfgang von Goethe, a novel by "Sad Young Witt" in 1774. This story happens when a young man commits suicide because of love for one-sided love. After the book was published, it was reported that the suicide rate of young men has increased. Hampton noted that the possibility of mimicking a suicide incident could be enhanced by "digesting" death, including dramatic or graphical details, and / or by continuing for a long period of time. This is the root cause of the anger of 13 reasons around Netflix, and some critics are seeking cancellation. (Relevant: Experts oppose "13 reasons of suicide prevention") Concern about suicide themed media can be traced back to 1774 and publishes John Wolfgang von Goethe's "Sadness of Young Sorrow". According to the scientific evidence standard of the time, it is said that this novel helped young people imitate suicide, but it is doubtful whether imitation of epidemic is genuine or in the mind of the authorities . The court found out that it was right. This month, I have presented a new study on the subject of suicide-themed imaginary media at the American Psychological Association's Mind, Technology, and Society Conference in Washington. This new study takes the form of a statistical program that combines meta-analysis, past research and finds patterns between them. In 1774, Goethe wrote "Sad Young Wit". It represents roughly the beginning of a romantic movement in art and philosophy. From the very beginning, stimulate the soul with passion and mystery, from a critical, scientifically inspired, enlightened sentence to a romantic aspiration for power outside the world, and at foreign times and places That started changing. Denis Diderot died on July 31st in 1784. Voltaire, Rousseau, and Diderot all died within a few years, and the philosophy of France lost three of the most sensible free thinkers. In the face of nature as a naked barbarian, Rousseau's reflection on the noble attitude of wildlife has great power to influence the next generation as romantic movements have gained momentum . Beaumarchais wrote "Wedding of Figaro". Maria and Harriet · Falconer published 'Slave Poetry'. Anti-slavery movement is booming, and many poems and pamphlets are published on this topic.

Introduction "Querelle des Bouffons" is a cultural fight against the comparative advantage of French and Italian opera style. It is divided into two camps; the supporters of Italian music are called coin de la réne and the supporters of French music are called coin du roy. However, Kelre has political and social influence on royal supporters supporting the French opera. I believe that they are based on the principles of French classicism and absoluteism. Institutional tools for destructive attacks. Gioachino Rossini (1792 - 1868) Italian composer. Rossini wrote 38 amazing operas and changed its opera to a modern form. Amazing works in Italy include Seville Barber (1816) and La Cenerentola. He also moved to Paris and wrote for the French drama including the opera "Count of Orly" (1828) and William Tire (1829) by the Austrian composer Franz Schubert (1797-1828). It links to a romantic era. One of the few composers, especially in his work, evokes Mozart's spirit - Symphony No. 5. Schubert has created seven symphony, including sacred music, opera, piano music. He is also a composer of great secular vocals. His famous work includes his immortal version of Ave Maria D.839, Major Piano Sonata, D 959, C Major Symphony (a wonderful C Album, D 944) and B. Pro D.485 Symphony Since the days of Handel and Mozart many composers have supported the use of Italian as the language of the script of the opera. From the Bell Kant era to Verdi, the composer sometimes oversees their opera versions in Italian and French. For this reason, operas such as Lucia di Lammermoor and Don Carlos are considered typical in both French and Italian versions today. Until the mid 1950's, they were able to use translations to make operas, even though these operas were not approved by composers and original writers. For example, the Italian opera house often sings Wagner in Italian. After World War II, the opera scholarship has been improved, and the artists have once again focused on the original version, and the translation has gone out of support. Understanding European languages, especially Italian, French and German, has become an important part of professional singer training. "The greatest opera training is linguistics and musicology," explains mezzo-soprano Dolora Zajick. Italian opera is both Italian opera art and Italian opera. The opera house was born in Italy around 1600 and the Italian opera has dominated the shape history until today. Many famous Italian operas including Handel, Gluck, Mozart were created by foreign composers. Italian native composer's work from the 19th century to the early 20th century, such as Rossini, Bellini, Donizetti, Verdi, Puccini, is one of the most famous operas in the world today. Performed at various opera houses.

Introduction The Akada standard reading (Genesis 22.1-19) encouraged Abraham to become a belief paradigm for infinite and consistent devotion to God. Although God spoke to Abraham and demanded painful violence that could ruin his physical commitment to Abraham, Abraham advanced a full complaint against the ban. These actions prove that Abraham is the great hero of faith; Abraham will obey any obstacle and cost. This traditional interpretation is easy to accept, even Kant does not question its validity. These three traditions have different belief paradigms, but these different paradigms suggest that they identify the common father Abraham's belief and seek their ultimate happiness in the fellowship of Abraham's love We will make it possible. (P.121) Comprehensive Karl Rahner (Coleman 2007: 8) proposes an anonymous Christian concept and God works outside churches of other religions, even if they do not themselves know It says to save grace by doing. But the problem is that Rana does not extend the boundaries of the church. This means that the grace of God is for all people of all religions, but it means that there is still a church full of Christians (Coleman 2007: 8-9). The religion of Abraham, collectively called Abrahamism, is a group of religious groups of Jews who claim to be Jews from ancient Israel and worship the god of Abraham. Abraham's religion is a monotheistic religion: they only adore one God, one God. This term derives from the patriarch of Abraham, the principal Bible person of the Old Testament, recognized by Christians, Muslims and others. Abraham's religion spread worldwide through the spread of the Roman Empire of the 4th century by Christianity adopted by the Islamic empire and the 7 th century Islamic empire. Today, the religion of Abraham is one of the major areas of comparative religion (as well as Indian, Iran, East Asian religion). The chief Abraham religion founded in chronological order was Judaism in the 7th century BC, Christianity in the 1st century CE, and Islam in the 7th century. Islam - Islam is the third of Muslims, born from the teachings of Muhammad of the 7th century. Muslims believe that Muhammad is the last of all religious prophets (beginning with Abraham) and the Quran, the Islamic Bible, is revealed to him by God. Muslims come from submitting words, obeying God is the main theme of this religion. In order to live a life of Islam, it is evidence of a fasting (seeing trees) during the Holy Moon of Ramadan (saw the tree), evidence of a pilgrimage to wheat, a believer (Shahada), a daily prayer (Sala) (North Korea)

The only similarity between Marx and Kiakegaard is that he thinks Hegel is indifferent except for the disagreement with Hegel. As Kierkegaard put together in Either / Or, as Marx embodies in many of his books, no one will act for greater benefit or take action regardless of the outcome. . They believe that Hegel promised to leave himself to the former. He succumbs to universal morality at the expense of individuals and at the expense of greater profits. Here, Kierkegaard and Marx are far from Hegel. Background information on Hegel and Feuerbach (Averneri, pp. 8-27) Marx felt Kant was "opposite" and "should" and he was interested in Hegel's philosophy. Hegel's philosophy provides a way to eliminate this dichotomy. By "to achieve idealism in reality". Marx later discovered that this dichotomy still exists in Hegel's philosophy and is hidden in the internal contradiction of his social and political institutional theory. Feuerbach provided Margel a methodological way of criticizing Hegel, a way of change. Hegel believes that thinking is the subject, and that existence is a predicate. But Feuerbach wants to study this subject in space and time to develop materialist philosophy. His method of change is based on people, subject, and thinking. Philosophy of the 1800s. Kant's philosophy stimulated various ideologies such as G. W. F. Hegel and Karl Marx in Germany during the 1800's. Hegel has developed a theory of historical change called the dialectic. There, the conflicting conflict led to the creation of a new unity, and it led to the opposite. Hegel 's theory was transformed into dialectical materialism by Marx. Marx believes that only material things are genuine. He said that all ideas are based on the economy. He believes that dialectics of conflict between capitalists and industrial workers will lead to the establishment of communism, he calls it social and political systems. Marx is a theorist who uses philosophy to achieve his political view. As a student in Berlin, he was influenced by Hegel's dialecticism (genius of the Berlin Philosophical Association who died in the last 1831). Hegel's theory is that under any circumstances, through the process of struggle progress will be made in the truth, the thesis will be opposed by the opposite, new development, integration will appear outside the conflict . But apart from what he read, Marx did not quite understand the industrial working class. In contrast, Engels has a strong interest in Hegel, but he also knows the factory life of modern fear. He is from a wealthy textile family in Germany. In 1842 he was sent to manage the Manchester Engels and Herman cotton factories. As a result of careful observation over two years and detailed research, the result of the affected sociological survey, 'Level of Britain' s working class' announced in Leipzig in 1845 was the result.

Some people claim that everyone has their own moral values. However, the amazing thing about ethical theory is not that there are so many theories, it is really few. Most of the modern ethical theory is dominated by two basic theories, the remaining five or six theories account for the majority of the rest of the discussion. On the next few pages I will explain the basics of eight different ethical theories such as Utilitarianism, Kant Ethics, Contractivism, Feminism or Nursing-based Ethics, Natural Law Theory, Confucian Ethics, Intuitionism. And the ideal observer theory, and virtue. ethics There are two major ethical theories trying to identify and justify moral rules and principles. Utilitarianism and moral ethics. Utilitarianism (also known as resultualism) is a moral development and completion in the modern world among the works of Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832) and John Stuart Miller (1806-1873). Theory There are several utilitarianisms. But fundamentally, the moral utilitarian approach means that ethical behavior (such as theft) or rules (eg, "keep your promise") are essentially true or false. Conversely, the correctness or erroneous nature of an act or rule is a problem of the overall unethical quality (eg, satisfaction of happiness, happiness, health, knowledge, or personal desire) arising as a result of an act or rule It is only. In short, according to Utilitarianism, morality is a matter of unethical quality created by moral behavior and regulation, moral responsibility is instrumental rather than internal. The main differences in normative ethics are teleological ethics theory, moral ethics theory and relativistic ethical theory. Scopos theory places moral evaluation and principles on the (real or potential) outcome of action. On the other hand, moral theory focuses on moral responsibility and intention to motivate behavior in moral evaluation and principles. Relativity theory represents a more extreme stance that there is no universal or absolute moral principle. Normative ethical relativism is a theory that claims that there is no universally valid ethical principle. Normative ethical relativism theory thinks that moral justification and behavioral mistakes are different from society to society, and universally universal ethical standards are not always binding on everything. The theory thinks that thinking about the basic principle of ethics (ethics) is all relative. Each culture establishes the basic values ​​and principles that form the basis of morality. The theory claims that this is always and always the case.

18th century philosopher: Relatively "enlighten" or "realization era" is the era of all progress and reforms throughout Europe and Europe. There was great progress in the fields of science, philosophy, mathematics and logic. Most people attribute these results to social critics of that age (also known as philosophers). These philosophers were controversial thinkers and pioneered the intellectual movement of the 1700s. They are often criticized and criticized by many others, but they insist on their beliefs. In the center of the enlightenment of the 18th century, there was a gently organized activity of famous French thinkers in the mid 18th century, the so-called "philosophy" (eg Voltaire, De Allenbell, Diderot, Montesquieu). These philosophies constitute an informal society of letters participating in broadly defined awareness projects such as the Encyclopedia project (see 5 below). However, there are other education centers noteworthy noteworthy of France. Moses Mendelssohn, General Electric Lessing, key figures including German enlightenment (Death Crown, Christian Wolf), famous Scottish enlightenment (key figures are Francis Hutchison, Adam Smith, David Hume, Thomas Reed) And Emmanuel Kant are also the center of thinkers of enlightenment and enlightenment scattered throughout Europe and the United States in the 18th century. Another time of major change is the 18th century or Age of Enlightenment. Despite its presence in Europe, the origin of enlightenment is closely related to France and its philosophers such as Voltaire and Rousseau. Enlightenment was inspired by the main discovery of the scientific revolution of the 17th century. It was during this time that the idea of ​​scientific revolution was spread and spread by philosophers (intellectuals of the 18th century). The age of enlightenment of the 18th century was born most accurately from the scientific revolution of the 17th century. The seeds planted there will bloom like Age of Enlightenment. A philosopher may be the most influential person of this era. The philosophy of the 18th century was influenced by the great achievements of the great thinkers of the 17th century such as Newton, Galileo, Kepler. As mentioned above, these thinkers are pursuing discovery in the glory of God. However, since philosophy has ideas all over the world, it is entirely against any religious intervention. Philosophers are critics of the world in which they live. They are most interested in criticizing politics and religion. They do this in the form of literary texts such as books, leaflets, encyclopedias.

Selbstüberschreitung: Jonas Cohns Wertphilosophieund Pädagogikvordem Hintergrund Dell Ethik Friedrich Nietzsches Description: Professors and educators of philosophy at the University of Freiburg from 1897 to 1933, Jonas Korn of the youth time opposition Nietzsche and Nietzsche ethical impact. The Cohen declaration shows that it is a preamble made in his "scientific value" (1932). "The title 'scientific value' means a discussion, I will deny the possibility of valuable science, so we will fight with everyone." But Nietzsche and his subordinates, Nietzsche and Cohen It is not the only aspect of the relationship. Dell gewohnlichen Lesart Dell dritten Formulierung wird somit Aufu jeden vernachlassigt Autumn, DAB Del Respekt VOR DEM vernunfti- Wesen ALS Zweck's bedeutet unbedingter, SICH selbst und dies anderen ALS Gesetzgeber einer idealen moralischen Ordnung ZU wollen; Dead Oder dead exception Idea Menschheit Willen ZU wollen freien Dberein-stimmung Dear Die. Jen Lesart, DAS is ideal, welcomed Kants Ethik entwirft sitdiche also vernachlassigt. Dell Grundlegung unterstreicht Dieben gegebene Einschatzung Kants Zusammenfassung Dell verschiedenen Formulierungen de categorischen Imperativs. Kant 's fuhrt' s hier AUS, DAB Ale Maxi male, MIT demischen Geregz zusammenstimmen, Allegemeinheit, Aene Materie (handelnde Menschen 's ALS Zwecke SICH selbst) and Aene vollstandige Bestimmung (ZU - sammenstimmung MIT dem Reichid Zwecke, Das heiBt Willen) haben freien Dbereinstimmung · Dear · Die. Einheit (form) Istdas Argemayne Gesetz ALS solches die Socialism reconstruction Harry Fan Delin Copper Kent Ethics of Butler College, hvanderl @ butler.edu Celanheiratete Gisèlede Lestrange 23. 1952 Indian Dezember, und Bachmanns Gedicht "Hotel de la Paix", dunkler unundenziell aussichtsloser wies von · einem Paris - Aufenthalt im Dezember 1956 spricht, ist VOR diesem Hintergrund interpretiert There is a dust in the Warden. Im Oktober 1957 GALT Dan ALS Dear letzte Zeitpunkt, DEM SICH Bachmann undCelanpersönlichbegegnetsind - Wuppertaler Tagung "Kritisch betrachtet Literaturkritik" Die. Das SIE ABER Im GegenteilderAnlaßfüreineWiederaufnahmeihrer Liebesbeziehung gewesen Ist, erfahren WIR nun durch Den Anmerkungsapparat de Briefwechsels zwischen Celan und seiner Frau

Who am I? Where did the world come from? What is my view on these issues? At first glance these seemingly simple questions and simple answers, the truth is that I began to develop my position for the whole semester. The answer to these questions turned out to be based on my understanding of Thomas Aquinas, Immanuel Kant, and Socrates philosophy. From these philosophers, I began to believe that I was born with natural morality, believed that God created me and the world, is a relative experientist. Let's find the answer in your life. Most important is what is Jesus' practice? Jesus said, "If someone listens to my words and does not believe him, I will not judge him, I am not to judge the world, but to save the world - I am the last Just to judge him on the day (John 12: 47-48) These are great statements There are many opportunities today to be attracted to political discussion Jesus also faces this challenge Jesus and Samaritan women who talked began to discuss whether the place of right worship was the town of Jerusalem or the city of Samaria (John 4) The disciples wanted to talk about the formation of Israel's political kingdom (Acts 1: 4-8) Every time Jesus ignores this question and focuses on his message - bringing salvation and new life to all without discrimination Jesus is to blame Rather than come, salvation The we came for. We will follow in Jesus! 47 "If someone listens to my words but I do not keep it, I can not judge that person, not to judge the world, but to save the world.49 I talk alone Because I am sending my father to say what I said, he knows that his order leads to eternal life.How my father tells me I said what I should do. "

Probably the easiest thing to write about writing in the morning. Many people do not want to get up in the morning or write that they do not want to go to work or school for lovers. All these written works are Obedo. Aubades is a very interesting poetry model. They have only one standard that is considered superior, but there is no proprietary technology. Aubades has existed since the Middle Ages and is still written today. Now, since we start at dawn, Purgatorio's Kant I became the captain of the Provence literature from the Italian Orbs, Arbu and Aruba. This song - the song of the dawn, this song is overturning the erotic lyrics tradition of Provence's poetry in many respects, the dawn has become an unpleasant moment for the loved ones to leave, and now the last wonderful It will be time and at last the pilgrim can continue to draw The poet can continue to draw and literally map the journey and can sail or send the metaphor as he wants - he can use I will Aubade (her name means "morning song") to listen to "the sap rise rising theme" in the greenhouse: What is fuga? How does Pinchin use the fugue-like structure in this story? Please find his "human body" and "repetitive melody". Toni Cade Bambara (1939 - 1995) In addition to writing many stories and novels, Toni Cade Bambara is also a civil rights activist, teacher and editor. Herlem resident living in Harlem reflects a deep understanding of urban space and has traveled extensively to Atlanta during the adulthood to Cuba and Vietnam. Byproduct byproduct byproduct introduction reintroduction conversion deductive plays cellce puce including spruce whip Lettuce fyce diverted facade cross porch cross pouch cross street 10th knight cascades knight captain gadoo adeloadadelaide adelaide adelaide adelaide adelaide shade eye shade umbrella lamp shade sunshade Night Hat Hime Park Park Gardening Horticulture Skate Escalade Orange Source Blade Noisy noises and events erupting, the party rushed the sailors, and eventually began with Obdo's window - from Meetball and Duke intervention dialogue with his friends to get some sense. Saul reports that his wife threw a chemical and physical handbook through a window of discussion on "communication theory". The focus of the comment on Saul 's conversation is that the information in the expected information is often destroyed on reception. Because epitaxial signs have different implications. Saul introduced "leakage" which is another aspect of entropy propagation, but it is explained with reference to the communiqué of love "The annoying four-letter word" is destructively "I" and "you It interferes with. Emotions close during the cycle, resulting in "ambiguity, redundancy, that is not a problem" (76). . . MUFFET is top secret "(75) Facts about companions of American short story document, 2nd edition (literary series companion)

Since it is very difficult to define certain words in English, giving meaning to them is a fierce discussion among thinkers. The way to define such an abstract word, its definition and purpose greatly depends on country, language, language, and people. Before others can propose more precise definitions than current leaders, people can only want to grasp the concept of these words. The reason for defining these words is the same as those changes, because their meaning is based on the final result of the opinion. McDowell: I do not think he even heard what we said, as we often say. The country under God is indivisible and has freedom and justice for all. Justice for all people means economic, social and criminal justice. This is what the Democratic Party of Japan is representing, it is in everyone. McDowell: I think it depends on what happens at that time. First of all, I do not know if it happened before the 2018 election. If he is somewhat elastic that we can weaken the structure and texture of our government and our lifestyle, that is definitely it. I think that the happiness of this country comes from all kinds of party game skills. Justice is one of the most important moral and political concepts. That word comes from the words of Latin, meaning rights and laws. The Oxford English Dictionary defines "ordinary people" as "usually morally correct action" and gives the word "fair" as a synonym for "giving each person their own rights". However, philosophers transcend the definition of etymology and dictionary, such as the nature of justice being regarded as the character of personality and the quality of ideal political society, and how it is applied to moral and social decision making I think that I want to do it. This article will focus on the concept of justice in Western philosophy. These will be the largest theories of ancient Greece (Plato and Aristotle), medieval Christianity (Augustin and Aquinas), two early modern times (Hobbes and Hume), and two modernities (Kant and Mill). And some modern (role and some successors)

Impact of scientific racial discrimination on black women Scientific racial discrimination is used to suppress, secrete and defend torture. In my article I will explore how scientific race discrimination can be used to weaken color women's health. Throughout history, experiments have been conducted on people of scientific racial discrimination, gender and reproductive abuse as reasons or potential premises behind this abuse. I will explore this idea of ​​various historical times using examples and introduce the effects of modern times. Sarah Burtman was born in South Africa and brought to London as an exhibition. She exhibited in the museum and turned to the top of a black woman. Her exaggerated features are used to justify scientific racial discrimination. A narrative story of zoological tendencies related to primitiveism or blacks, as well as a demonstration of the eyes of Europe. Contemporary culture has forgotten the exploitative nature of this image and now it is full of praise. Scalimetry in other pseudoscience, polygenics and frenology has a holistic view that defines black as the basis. The chart focuses on similarities with black monkeys. Because the monkey's model ran too much, they were backed by disciples and philosophers like Darwinian scientists, Kant, Voltaire and other enlightened thinkers. Impact of scientific racial discrimination on black women Scientific racial discrimination is used to suppress, secrete and defend torture. In my article I will explore how scientific race discrimination can be used to weaken color women's health. Throughout history, experiments have been conducted on people of scientific racial discrimination, gender and reproductive abuse as reasons or potential premises behind this abuse. I merely draw the biggest Thomas, but it will also criticize / strict the white community. Richard Wright is his novel 'Son of Aboriginal', if society refuses to offer freedom and opportunity to everyone, he said hero Bigger is a terrible symbol. Violence, poverty and racial discrimination are inevitable, especially during the 1940s it is a deciding factor. Larger Thomas "It was destroyed by racial discrimination and racial discrimination" From the first abduction in Africa to the final destination for the Caucasian host, slaughtered women are vulnerable to sexual assault, which is considered to be their fault. The scientific racial discrimination used to justify slavery uses the physical characteristics of black women (and men) to prove white abuse. (After the liberation, a white woman invaded a black man for sin. Hussy Tales and Whorr Stories: Horror stories, part of Sally Hemmings' life and racial abuse history

The problem that always existed in America and other countries is that it contains ethical problems. For centuries, many philosophers, such as Socrates, Plato and Aristotle, have produced ethical works and theories. Morality can often be defined as moral research (Cohen, p. 17). Aristotle's Nicoma Ethics, Virtue ... There are two kinds of intelligence. Morality and morality, mainly the intellectual virtue, its birth and growth into education (therefore the need for experience). And time), and moral virtue is by custom. The object "dictionary" comes from the word "greedy" and is used for "target" or "target". If ethical advice of morality is fully directed towards goodwill, the moral concept is considered objective. Scopolletec Ethics focuses on results or results, moral judgment is entirely based on judgment of good results or bad results. (Becker, 1992, 1235-8) A kind of argument derived from Kant that aims to establish the necessary conditions for the possibility of transcendental argument. For example, we must believe that we are free to carry out our actions; therefore faith in freedom is a prerequisite for the possibility of action. As part of discussing bioethics in a changing world, you should measure conditions or forces that are inconsistent with it, or just transcend ethical considerations. Some examples include greed, poverty and war. Greedy can be a great force to promote over-exploitation of natural capital such as over-exploitation, excessive logging of marine resources, reckless deforestation and so on. Satisfying desires for personal strengthening and exhibitions are often beyond ethical considerations. From an environmental management perspective, poverty may invalidate ethical considerations. The outbreak of war brought about the cessation of almost all moral principles not only at personal, social and political levels but also at the biological and environmental level. Ecological ethics is different from morality rooted in self-interests of enlighteners. It is the foundation of almost every moral philosophy to date. Ethical and ethical encouragement than short-term, greedy, and opposition to human trend towards limited pity. It also denies any responsibility for the influence of human behavior on millions of other species on Earth and individual creatures. For example, a company wants to cut old old broadleaf forests and turn it into a paper product. Corporate officials believe that local work depends on logging, the public needs logs of trees and trees, old trees can be replaced with special trees of the same high quality, and so on. This is a moral code of human-centricism

Carlyle is an enthusiastic of aesthetic art, not only despising Scottish contracts but also refusing to read poetry like Keats and equally forgiving him for a storyteller like Scott do not do. Carlyle is confident in spiritual life and achieves this goal through a great individual individual who dominates the era with moral power; Ruskin has been humanized through moral rights and devotion of aesthetic principles We will spiritualize and refine through social conditions. Everyone's essence is to accomplish it; Arnold will ferry the rough masses of society as far as possible through the myriad effects of mass, morality and aesthetic culture. Should we consider interrupting the method of classifying and evaluating the aesthetics, curriculum and pedagogy of epistemologic learning in critical efforts to tackle some of these arguments and some of its consequences? In addition to photographic studies of natural and healthy teeth of all ages, Atlas covers the basic principles of aesthetic analysis and the basic biological and material requirements for aesthetic rehabilitation. This project will also be more consistent with fraudulent claims - not only need to disarm parameters until Duchamp decides aesthetic interest based on artistic and cognitive skills, as well as the definition of aesthetics It is because it needs to be considered. It is standard. According to the complexity of artwork "If something determines that what is called experience rises above the threshold of perception and is specified for its own benefit, the object creates a special and dominant I have aesthetics "(with experience) Please recall before explaining the aesthetic standards for judging movies, as promised in the last month's column ("Best Picture - Who?"). Aesthetic criteria are not the only criteria for film judgment or judgment. A considerable number of viewers examine the moral and political influence of the best film candidate, not the quality of art, or eliminate the movie based on the reaction of the intestines first. But for me, the nomination of the best work means some degree of aesthetic quality. Ineffective efforts without art will make other considerations There are three fields of aesthetics, morality, religion. The moral field is merely a transitional field, and its best expression is a confession as a negative act. The scope of aesthetics is a range of immediacy, ethics is a range of requirements (this requirement is infinite, it is always bankrupt), religion is a range of realization, for example, that when a person satisfies a charity organization it is not satisfied Please be careful. A box or gold bag, a confession produced infinite space, and the result is a religious contradiction: it appears in 70,000 liters of water, but it is happy again. Reasonable human condition 5, Kant, Agnosticism and anarchism: Theology - Political Expo - Part 1, radical agnosticism, Section 1.1, Introduction

Style and Superconvenience Summary: Cope's Computer and Music Style (1991) describes a computer program that is said to be able to express and copy music styles only based on input components. If this description is correct, the characteristics of that text must locally exceed the style's characteristics. In other words, the style attribute is completely dependent on the properties of the text. In my thesis, I do not think that style attributes are locally optimized for text attributes, so what is Cope's program and what can not basically express styles or copy it? . Abstract: Nonnaturalists should explain why the norm transcends nature. Since super sex is a phenomenon of attribute distribution, interpretation of super sex needs to explain the distribution of normative attributes. Provide framework classification of this interpretation based on interpretation attracting factors. Then I excluded the option of using only natural elements based on losing the promise of non - naturalism, and the option of not using natural elements based on the inability to interpret supernatural sensations. This leaves a central set of non-naturalistic frameworks. Since the framework that uses only standard attributes and features of natural attributes will fail, only frameworks are left, and these frameworks also use standard attributes and some elements outside the natural attributes Use it. I have previously extended the concept of powerful super sex to logical super convenience, but this time I would like to extend this concept to forensic powerful super convenience, or simply temporary temporary one I will. Nominal transcendence is an argument that the existence of B facts and certain characteristics transcend A facts. Today, B fact has a legal advantage in A fact. Only in the past, the field of A facts is a super convenient infrastructure, and the field of B fact is beyond the realm. The following is the main meaning of legal supernatural problems: Please correct all A - facts and you are fixed with natural or physical necessities Nature's law as a real world Gather all the facts of B or say differently and know all the information about the facts of A based on experience so that you can learn all the information about facts of B by experience. Reasonable human condition 4, Kant Ethics and the existence of humans: Studies of moral philosophy - Section 1.4, "World of happiness": EKE and moral naturalism

The study of fascism in the modern world examines the development of fascism and extreme nationalism in modern Croatia, Hungary and Serbia. Fascism and extremism are not the same thing. Fascists may be extreme nationalists (and certainly nationalists), but extreme nationalists are not necessarily fascists. These two terms are important for this check and need to be defined. Super nationalist super nationalism means not only that it means strong patriotism and a very straightforward view of your country but also that you want to exclude others from one country, especially the others are somewhat different. Authorized Italian "fascist philosopher" and fascist politician Giovanni Gentile discovered that "fascism is the result of Marxism and Sorelli legacy." Contemporary Italian idealism with mature fascism Gentile people believe that Marxism and fascism share the inheritance of Hegel that will shape the political history of the 20th century Gentiles appreciate Karl Marx and Imanuel . The philosophical inspiration of Kant and Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel led to the conclusion that Marx's philosophy is basically correct. Furthermore, the Gentiles were able to distinguish Marx as "a complete Hegelist" and regard it as an overall tradition of "German idealism". It is important to clarify certain things before proceeding. Fascism lacks commonly accepted definitions. The verdict came from Emilio Gentile (Italian fascism), Stanley Payne (Spanish fascism), Gerhart Hass (German and European fascism), Roger Griffin (political theorist), Robert Paxton, Zeev Sternhell and Dave Renton. There is "Fascist minimum". Next, there are some concepts such as 14 points in Umberto Eco, 13 points in Dimitri Kitsikis, 10 points in Emilio Gentile. All of them emphasize similar things that make up the fascist regime. Briefly - if the world's intellectuals do not do anything, it will determine the generally accepted definition of fascism. Myth: Fascism is to insert "populism" / "national nationalism" / buzzword. Reality: Fascism is a way to combine the stagnation of the economy with the inside of the group. If you can only understand sentences about fascism, make it one - that's the key. Like all of life, love, fear, desire, hatred is also deliberate. There are reasons for the existence of fascism: quantitative analysis of the outcome of economic stagnation. Let's think like this. If the harvest suddenly fails you need to distribute the crop in some way. People are feeling hungry because of market and price. What do you mean? Who will get it, how much is it?

While reviewing Descartes's book "Meditation on the First Philosophy," assess Descart's argument about the existence of God. I noticed that there were some fatal flaws in his reasoning in the third mediation. Please read this chapter carefully so please start with the beginning and rate his reasoning. As Descartes thought that I was self-evident, he valued that he was convinced that he was a thoughtful, and then he continues to see other things he can decide I intended to do. He realized that "I am thoughtful", he has a "clear understanding" of what he is claiming, then looking back on it and clearly recognizing that the truth is true . . Discussion of Rene Descartes on the existence of God Rene Descartes's debate about the existence of God is related to his rationalistic deduction reasoning. Descartes concluded that the truth about the existence of God exists in His idea about the completeness of God and the essence of God (as a complete existence that must exist to be perfect). - All moral arguments about the existence of God are based on the principle that all of us share common sense of morality. Despite cultural differences, in a broad sense, people all over the world have ambiguous thoughts about right and wrong; a moral argument to the existence of God is that this mutual understanding is evidence of the existence of God I will say that. Immanuel Kant advocated this argument (not a moral argument); a god as a source of objective morality Second argument about the existence of God. Because Descartes believes the existence is perfect, it can become a predicate to God. First, I will explain what the ontological argument of the existence of God is. Next, I will explain why Descartes decided to incorporate God into his philosophical approach. As a predicate of God existence reveals some truth about God. Ontology seeks to prove the existence of God from a transcendental point of view In the 17th century, René de Carte defended a series of similar arguments. For example, in the fifth meditation, Descartes claims to provide evidence that God exists within the concept of extremely perfect existence. Descartes believes that there is contradiction in imagining a very perfect existence that does not exist, compared to the idea of ​​a triangle whose interior angle is not equal to 180 degrees. Therefore, he believes that we have a very perfect idea of ​​existence - we imagined a really perfect being - we believe we must conclude that there is a perfect existence Descartes insists that there may be the best existence and will try to gain knowledge about him. However, Descartes is a deadly and finite existence without God's will, who can not seize infinite will and nature. By definition, even if God is permitted to do so to him, God may also ban this. Descartes believes that allowing God to know himself and allowing him to recognize himself through logic is an estimate that heavily depends on two very unstable supports. And God is not a crook. All knowledge claims are easy to base and ultimately seem to be present in some unconfirmed assumptions (according to Russell according to mathematics), but that is unnoticed by us Hypothetical benefits to prevent from giving away

The main job of the doctor is to alleviate the patient's pain even if it does not help them. People do not want to endure pain and suffering at the end of their lives. They want to die quickly and without pain, but this idea is contrary to what people call "sacred life". Kant wrote this concept and said that he thinks this is wrong, because if you are in the same situation you generally think that everyone wants to die prematurely I can not do. Meanwhile, Utilitarians promote maximum happiness, ease pain and suffering, so they will be euthanized in this situation. Case Vignette 1: Jessica 16 years old Jessica was sent to the school counselor with the attention of the grade coordinator. Jessica thought that it was difficult to concentrate on the class, and the school time was always late. When I attended school my hair was vague. The coordinator is worried about what Jessica can do at home and may be involved in infamous malicious drug rings and other illegal activities. Today, Jessica Spencer is a popular high school girl in the outskirts of California, friends are April, Keecia, Lulu. Jessica's best friend, all four are cheerleaders in April. One day, at school, Jessica took a big girl named Hindenburg and a girl of a wizard named Eden. Later Jessica and her friends visited a local shopping center. Jessica was involved in shoplifting along with rival Bianca and found an earring in a shop that focused on Africa. Earrings can not be sold, so Jessica stole Jessica Spencer is the most popular and popular girl in high school. Jessica, her best friend in April, and some other hot girls Lulu and Caesia, hung out and shopped and came to the mall. They entered a new era store where they saw old earrings. Jessica did not know that these are magical works of ancient Abyssinia. The princess, known as the Nawa Princess, hated the groom's married groom and exchanged her body with a slave girl through a set of magical earrings. Earrings were not on sale so Jessica stealed them. But the next morning she got a lot of reality when she woke up with a 30 year old low age male, Clive, a professional criminal's body. Clive was in the body of Jessica. Now Jessica (on the body of Clive) finds a way to regain her body and Clive (in the body of Jessica) begins a criminal carnival to blame Jessica for responsibility Use the new body of. ! Author: Anthony Pereira <hypersonic91@yahoo.com>

Luis, Ed and the role of gang rapists can be tested in the hell of "Dante's Hell" translated by Robert Pinsky. Each hell circle is reserved for certain types of sinners with very specific penalties. When James Dickie's "Rescue" characters appear from the perspective of Dante's nine inner circles, their actions seem even wicked when they are taken alone to Dicky's novel. In the world of Dickey, the homicide can be regarded as a reasonable murder, suddenly Lewis and Ed are put in the hole of hell and the hill is killed along with rapists. At the beginning of Dante's Inferno, the difference between the characteristics of Dante the Poet and Dante the Pilgrim is very obvious. The poet Dante basically wrote this epic and assigned a shameless penalty for each sinner but the pilgrim Dante experienced the feelings of each sinner personally across the different circles of hell . The poet Dante has a different view of each sinner, which allows him to understand the pilgrim Dante's forgotten details In Dante Alighieri The Inno, perceived by The Inferno, the poet Dante Alighieri emphasizes perception; through sight, the pilgrim Dante can recognize and learn his experience in hell. Since pilgrim Dante is often attracted to a specific image, vision plays an important role in work. The sight of the sinner carries Dante, as a result the sinner is attracted to Dante and Virgil. It seems that Dante is observing everything Avoid the pain of hell. The famous Italian poet Dante Alighieri writes about the physical depiction of hell and the punishment of all sinners against their sins. The comedy of God records the journey of Dante from the depth of hell to the glory of heaven, but it contains a deeper meaning. Through his motif, interaction with sinners, and other literary works and hell combinations, Dante reveals the true meaning of hell. "Inferno's Kant 18's Dante Alighieri's iterative theme, Marcel Proust once said that Rao us ..." A trip to explore wisdom through wild is happening at The Inferno of Dante Alighieri. Inferno is the first part of a trilogy called epic, god comedy. Inferno talks about the narrator In the first book of his god "hell", Dante Alighghieri presents the brilliant and awakened depth of hell. Dante "visits" and observes the state of the soul of the saint who is always assigned to hell, so we allow readers to think about the state of their soul. Any cant written in Inferno provides a good explanation of hell pain and justice, but Canto V provides a keen view of the distribution of punishments based on crime. Through this cautious reading, I will learn about three different areas of Dante's Hell, the restricted geography and punishment of sinners, the character of sinners and "fairness".

After graduating from high school during the summer vacation, I experienced an ethical dilemma. It is difficult for me to make ethical decisions, but I feel guilty about my choice. I am concerned about ethical dilemmas while considering the need to attend New Westberry State University to fulfill the needs of my father immigrating to home country and being a mother when he is diagnosed with breast cancer Discuss. together. I will discuss whether my decision is ethical from the perspective of Mill, Kant, Gilligan. To make a moral decision is a final consideration of what is the best decision in this situation This is a fair and reasonable decision that applies to situations involving an ethical dilemma. Regarding the obligations and responsibilities of those making decisions, ethical decisions are "right things" and "right way", consistent with the values ​​and actions outlined in the NCCP Code of Ethics. Do you want to know more about how to make ethical decisions? The Ethical Judgment (MED) module is part of the Coach National Coach Certification Program (NCCP) Multi Sports Module series and provides additional knowledge. For details, please contact a local or regional coach agent. When we decide to accept responsibility and make decisions including ethical considerations, we face a personal moral dilemma. Personal moral dilemmas can be contrasted with ethical problems. The latter is usually a matter of public policy, including ethical issues. Examples of these problems include the death penalty ethics, imprisoning more people, applying alternative sanctions to convicted criminals, and other important social problems. A further difference between moral dilemmas and ethical problems is that ethical dilemmas are personal responsibilities and need to make decisions. Small business decisions should be ethical decisions. In order to make ethical decisions, decision makers need to be sensitive to ethical issues. In addition, there is a way to make ethical decisions. Ethical decisions are often automated when executed in a familiar way. The Markkula Application Ethics Center explores the ethical dilemma and recommends the following framework to determine the ethical behavior program. "Ethical Thinking Framework", University of Santa Clara, June 1, 2012, www.scu.edu/ethics / practice / decision / framework.html. However, in many cases (if not most of the time), owners, administrators and employees of small and medium enterprises often have instinct to know whether certain decisions are not ethical.

The cosmological argument about the existence of God is based on the principle of causality. This basically means that the universe is the influence of career, this is God. One of the oldest and most famous supporters of the cosmological controversy outlines his argument for the existence of God in an article titled "Five Ways". The first way he insisted was to deal with that movement. Aquinas said that in order for something to move, it must be moved. It will not move without external force. Discussion that is most widely accepted and criticized about the existence of God. My purpose in this article is to explain why cosmological arguments are proof of the existence of God, to understand that it is the importance of posteriori posteriori discussion, and to my common argument It is to observe the position of. First of all, as a living person on earth, we can safely conclude that the majority of things that exist today have their cause. I confirmed that there is a reason. Before attempting to explain and evaluate the moral argument about God's existence, it is beneficial to understand the purpose of God's existential argument. Of course, though the views on this are diverse, most contemporary supporters do not believe that theoretical arguments are "proof". They should provide effective arguments and prerequisites that reasonable people can not deny. Such success criterion obviously sets high criteria for success and supporters of the argument of the writer can hardly meet philosophical discussions of interesting conclusions in areas other than formal logic such criteria Correctly point out. Is the premise of these arguments reasonable, at least for reasonable people, more reasonable than rejection? Discussion of Rene Descartes on the existence of God Rene Descartes's debate about the existence of God is related to his rationalistic deduction reasoning. Descartes concluded that the truth about the existence of God exists in His idea about the completeness of God and the essence of God (as a complete existence that must exist to be perfect). - All moral arguments about the existence of God are based on the principle that all of us share common sense of morality. Despite cultural differences, in a broad sense, people all over the world have ambiguous thoughts about right and wrong; a moral argument to the existence of God is that this mutual understanding is evidence of the existence of God I will say that. Immanuel Kant advocated this argument (not a moral argument); a god as a source of objective morality

Food has been an artistic theme for a long time and was a means of exhibiting technical seals. Still life line of sight by Pieter Claesz and Paul Gaugin, we never feel hungry. But art can also be a means of advertising food. "Viva La Pizza!" [Melville House, $ 18.35] in the "Strange and Wild Art" series on the recently released pizza box is an innovative ability for food vendors to design packaging for their products Introducing. KidArtLit - Every month, KidArtLit carefully picks a beautiful new hardcover picture book and creates related art projects for your family. They crammed the book, all the artwork you need, and their moving mini magazine, and sent it to your door. What I like most about this subscription box is that it helps children learn more deeply. This is a way to nurture a lifelong reader. In addition, KidArtLit has not promised - you can cancel at any time or skip shipping easily. (3-8 years old) Andy Warhol's "Brillo Boxes" looks like ordinary people. Why are they art? Each box of Warhol is "not an ordinary box"; it is a work of art using this new artistic theory. "After all, the difference between Brilo boxes and artworks that are made up of Brilo boxes is a particular art theory (page 41). If there is not much theory or history, this may not be an art Danto 's idea is that whenever you provide a list of features and styles you can use to make artwork, you can also turn on the option that someone rejects them (this is a genius Is very similar to Kant 's argument about how to defeat the laws of art and set new rules through role models.) I remember seeing this episode of Shark Tank several years ago. Brought the design of a new pizza box that claims that the brand is more functional than a traditional box. "How do you sell more pizza?" Kevin asked the guest. Back then, I knew where Kevin came from. Because I could not see commercials on pizza boxes I wanted to buy pizza. Now the situation is very different, with the right combination of social media influence and storytelling, the pizza box is combined with the unique wishes of the millennium generation, and thanks to the pizza box you can sell more pizza.

This article is the last article written by Franken. This provides a rigorous and detailed investigation of various possible meanings of one of the most famous footnotes of Siegwick. Method Dragon was very interested in Sidgwick 's idea, but it is not a synonym for the modern people to argue that their interest is the only reasonable end goal. Explanation of the starting point of detailed review of (...). Morality is somewhat difficult to define, but it is in contrast to ethical theories such as utilitarianism, often based on moral judgment about results and outcomes. (Generally speaking, this ethical theory is called result-based, Utilitarian is the resultant principle of using utility as a result of selection.) Instead, non-moralists are obliged not based on results or results, To rely on the principle. Make ethical decisions. For example, non-moralists may think that lying is wrong. It is because it infringes the obligation to tell the truth, tells the truth, and respects the rights of others. Nursing ethics contrasts with a better known ethical model such as outcome (Utilitarianism, etc.) and moral theory (such as Kant's ethics). Because nursing ethics will try to incorporate traditional women's virtues and values. School supporters believe that these strengths and values ​​do not exist. Feminism focused on traditional moral model care is a field of feminist thought provided primarily by nursing ethics developed by Carol Gilligan and Nel Noddings. This theory system focuses on social care, women's care, and depreciation methods. "A feminist focused on a feminist regards female care as human power." It can be taught to men and women and should be expected. Nodding suggested that moral care might be a more specific moral dilemma evaluation model rather than justice ethics. Nursing ethics is sometimes called "ethics of love" or "relational ethics." Compared to the two traditional two normative ethical theories, there is Utilitarianism and Kant ethics ethics. Nursing ethics is regarded as virtue ethics, but it differs from traditional Aristotle's virtue ethics. Some nursing ethicists refuse generalization, but there are some important things in common nursing ethics. Traditional ethical theory assumes that moral actors are independent and independent individuals. However, nursing ethics points out the fact that humans are basically dependent on others. Children depend on their parents, elderly people rely on children and other carers, people with disabilities must rely on others. Everyone experiences a dependent process based on their age, physical or mental state

Dante greatly changed his speech everywhere in Malebolge. Each Borgia has its own distinctive atmosphere and the sudden tone and structural changes between them make a transition from Borgia to Borgia as a mixture of style and skill. But the change between the eighth and the ninth is not that surprising. Among them, the reader looks for two eloquent dramatic monologues. One of them is a wonderful, adage explanation. Ulysses' heroic advice and Gideo Montefeltro 's self - revelation replaced Muhammad, Dock Dwiwi, Mosca and Bertrand Born' s truncated, compressed rhetoric. Early critics accepted the identification of the Pope as a heathen. Bruno Nardi, Nuova Lectura Dantis: 11 Kant Xl dell 'Inferno (1951; reprint, Rome: Signorelli, 1955) discusses historical confusion. He showed that Dante made Pope Anastasia a believer of the Acacian heresom, perhaps as he favorably accepted the butler in the Eastern Church, according to the declaration of Graciane. And he obeyed the heretic. Reade, The Moral System believes that the entire chapter is used to explain why Dante has drawn in, and the seventh circle is based on atrocities and atrocities atrocities. Nature of animals In the ninth circle, Alfred Trioro excessively exploited beasts with malicious intent. "Matta Bestilita of Dart Hell: Theory and Image" Traditio 24 (1968), 247-92; he points out an interesting point to guardians of hell, the more sinners become barbarous they are brutal It is less humanitarian. For political colors in the classical implications of this episode, such as tyranny or political asylum in the city, please refer to my article on Article 24 of the next edition of Lectura Dantis California. I also talked about the possibility of Dante stealing himself as a thief from a classic poet, but it is for the benefit of society. Dante has reason to agree that Ulysses is the core of this article, as Ulysses is not only hinting at the temptation of fraud but also because of his trip to the unknown world. Dante explained about his journey in the metaphor of the ocean because Ulysses was afraid of sinning to believe too much mistake in his identity. Dr. Drowning, he was tied to a humble scorpion, and when he reached the top of the sky, he again missed Ulysses' s "crazy path" (Pr. 27.82 - 83)

Belinda will condemn the rock lock from Alexander Pope. I check Rock Rape's Cant IV line 147-160. In this selection, Belinda talked about the monologue and regretted the act that led her to lose the lock. But it is clear that she exaggerates her loss and the precaution she may have taken. By quoting the fundamental change necessary to prevent this, she revealed that women are extremely difficult to escape from men. Praise to the main role of Pope Belinda's "Rape of Rape" in the Rape of the Pope can be regarded as a welcome and curse from the boss, but the complexity and sometimes contradictions of Belinda lit a more fair view I will. The advent of Belinda and the world she lives in are explained in a very fantastic and beautiful way. Even details like Belinda's hair arrangement result from a wonderful entity called Sylphs. Its only work is to make her look best. Belinda will condemn the rock lock from Alexander Pope. I check Rock Rape's Cant IV line 147-160. In this selection, Belinda talked about the monologue and regretted the act that led her to lose the lock. But it is clear that she exaggerates her loss and the precaution she may have taken. By quoting the fundamental change necessary to prevent this, she revealed that women are extremely difficult to escape from men. In Kant III of Pope Alexander's "Rape of Rape", the Pope was talking about Belinda's director about less fighting epics. "Belinda is now a person aspiring to become famous, only the adventurous knight, / Ombre, decides their misfortune; and / and inflicts her breasts in future conquests" (III .25-8). The Pope gave Belinda the power to command the army to direct the fight between major players. If we regard this part as an example of women's power and control, we can not ignore the importance of what actually happens. The Pope does not believe that all women are stupid and can not fulfill their duties, but his overall view on women is negative in "Rape of Rape". Understanding of the characteristics of the Pope's female is greatly affected by social recognition. That is, women are inferior tools for men.

The failure of the League of Nations and the outbreak of war in 1939 occurred in the Second World War. These include failure of the League of Nations, the Treaty of Versailles, Hitler's actions, and so on. Some of them are more important than others, primarily related to different reasons. The failure of the League of Nations is one of the main reasons for the outbreak of war. It reveals weaknesses to promote Hitler's invasion. The alliance failed to solve major political disputes. The League of Nations can celebrate its success, but the alliance has any reason to review its failure and where it did not work. These failures, in particular in the 1930s, badly exposed the weaknesses of the League of Nations and played a role in the outbreak of the Second World War in 1939. In the 1920s, the failure of the League of Nations was basically small, not threatening world peace. But they marked - if the hero does not have "playing games", the League of Nations can not solve the problem. The failure of the League of Nations is one of the main reasons for the outbreak of war. It reveals weaknesses to promote Hitler's invasion. The alliance failed to solve major political disputes. There are several such cases, but the most important are the Manchuria crisis of 1931 and the Abyssinian crisis of 1935. In 1931, members of the alliance ... showed further ... After the First World War the League of Nations was founded peacefully, and one of its functions is to support the Treaty of Versailles did. This made many people believe that the alliance is the power to represent the winners of the First World War against Germans. This led to a link to the severity of the Convention, which brought about lack of trust in the League of Nations. For example, the Germans have to accept the full responsibility to feel pain, to begin the war, and hate that they have to pay compensation of £ 6.6 billion, and nothing to express it . Implement and maintain international peace among nations. However, when the coalition collapsed due to the outbreak of World War II in 1939, it was difficult for liberals to understand their failure. Because events seemed to contradict their theory. Therefore, despite the efforts of people like Kant and Wilson, liberalism can not maintain its strength and a new theory emerged to explain the sustained war. This theory is called realism. Realism seemed to provide a compelling explanation during the Second World War on how and why the most widespread deadly war in history experienced virtual peace and optimism Sometimes it gained momentum. Period It started in the naming format of the 20th century, but many realists have advanced further. In fact, realists are far beyond the ancient world. So they found a pattern of human behavior that is clearly similar to that of our modern world. McGlinchey, S (2017) International Relations Theory. Bristol, UK: Electronic international relations. ISBN 9781910814192 can be obtained from http://eprints.uwe.ac.uk/34087.

Discussion of Rene Descartes on the existence of God Rene Descartes's debate about the existence of God is related to his rationalistic deduction reasoning. Descartes concluded that the truth about the existence of God exists in His idea about the completeness of God and the essence of God (as a complete existence that must exist to be perfect). As a rationalist philosopher, Descartes truncates human knowledge as a product of our sensory data (our senses), but an epistemological sense that our knowledge can be obtained through a process of deducing our own idea I support the position. RenéDescartes, often called the father of modern philosophy, has developed Anselm's assertion when trying to prove the existence of God in the meaning of the word "God". Ontological arguments are a priori arguments. The basis of these arguments depends on the understanding of the essence of the human god. The definition of Anselm's god is "an extremely perfect existence", which is the basis of his argument. God must be something that can not be considered absent: if you imagine a triangle, one of its main features is that it has three sides and three corners. These are triangle predicates. Descartes has expanded his point of view. This time I mentioned the attribute of God. If you imagine something perfect, it must be more perfect if it exists. Also, the most perfect ones have all attributes including existence. Therefore, Descartes believes that a very perfect existence has all the predicates. Discussion of Rene Descartes on the existence of God Rene Descartes's debate about the existence of God is related to his rationalistic deduction reasoning. Descartes concluded that the truth about the existence of God exists in His idea about the completeness of God and the essence of God (as a complete existence that must exist to be perfect). - All moral arguments about the existence of God are based on the principle that all of us share common sense of morality. Despite cultural differences, in a broad sense, people all over the world have ambiguous thoughts about right and wrong; a moral argument to the existence of God is that this mutual understanding is evidence of the existence of God I will say that. Immanuel Kant advocated this argument (not a moral argument); a god as a source of objective morality

The theory that best represents the case is that the resurrection from the dead is moral. Morality is "responsible research". The theory of morality argues that people may find that they are in a situation where they have nothing to do with the use of reasoning. Morality deals with command commands. That is to use the word "should" to make a claim. Morality is about people's responsibility to fulfill their obligations to clients and themselves. Cases causing ethical dilemmas are as follows. I will come back from death. Personally, the moral approach to solving the dilemma is not attractive. Do not make a choice can be considered to be a choice. The moral idea of ​​not pulling the switch caused five people to die, and in my opinion, five people worsened and died worse than one. Although the killing may be wrong, like a Utilitarian, it would be better for a few to die. Moralism criticizes utilitarianism due to lack of personal moral perception, but chasing morality may lead to worse results than the pursuit of utilitarianism. In my opinion, this is the reason that utilitarianism is better. My decision is not usually a result specific to my interest but it focuses on finding the best overall results. Therefore, the theory that giving priority to maximum happiness seems better. The theory that best represents the case is that the resurrection from the dead is moral. Morality is "responsible research". The theory of morality argues that people may find that they are in a situation where they have nothing to do with the use of reasoning. Morality deals with command commands. That is to use the word "should" to make a claim. Morality is about people's responsibility to fulfill their obligations to clients and themselves. - Having higher education is a lifelong goal for me. I wanted a job to save animals for the rest of my life but as I grew older I knew I was a veterinarian This is the goal of my life. I am a veterinarian now, but in order to fully achieve my life goal I need to achieve a higher degree of educational background. Having a university degree makes me enthusiastic about missing; I can say that my goal of becoming a veterinarian at college is satisfying for me. Responsible ethical theory gives the concept of morality derived from the Greek word Deon meaning responsibility. The concept of morality is not the result, but a way to achieve good and right by studying individual behavior and social policy. Emmanuel Kant is one of Taoist thinkers, and moral thinkers always criticize that morality is not a result of specific person's behavior, but individuals should be defined as responsibility to each other. He said that happiness is not a moral matter. As he said that this is the motive and goal of human beings, he chooses whether he is right or wrong, it is not the result.

Believe me, I do not only believe that this earth is managed by evil. There is reliable evidence. Because you can not understand it, I can not produce it Generally, if life gives you a chance, you will have to say that this idea is managed by evil As an individual, you can ask yourself, If anyone is morally self like you, what does society look like? Does society get better or worse? By doing this question to myself, you are really testing the universality of your behavior. A well-known moralist, Immanuel Kant, stated that we should take action to make everyone else in the same situation take action. We should also consider ways to improve our moral life and improve society. Sir Carl Popper wrote that society is open. The power of discussion will persuade the society everyone thinks for themselves. When no one refuses to think, that idea is raised by another person. Assumption) others are subordinate). Nothing, this is a sign of a closed society Perhaps this strange lifestyle is not that strange indeed if everyone is as honest and enthusiastic as Mersault. Then perhaps people may be themselves without worrying about what other people may be thinking. Our society is filled with people's behavior as if to bother things. The urge to heroism is natural and admits that it is honest. Everyone admits that it may release this oppressed force and cause a devastating blow to the present society. The fact is that this is something that society has always existed: the symbolic behavior system, the structure of status and role, the habits and rules of customs, the aim to be a carrier of the earth 's heroism. If everyone honestly admits that they are heroic impulses, it will be a catastrophic release of truth. This will make people demand that they give what they deserve to them - the main sense of human value, as a unique contributor to the life of the universe. Our modern society does not shake their foundation, but how can we meet this honesty? Only society we call "primitive" today can provide that feeling to its members.

According to its definition, irony is a rhetorical or literary technique that conveys the underground meaning which is completely opposite to the literal meaning of its obvious words. Writers use this technique to remind the reader to reconsider the problem of the author. Jonathan Swift casts what he calls a "moderate proposal" among "modest proposals". Mark Twin also expressed his passion for war and his patriotism in his war prayer. The problem of my ironical analysis is that I think that this irony is misunderstood. Nodding to Deleuze, I would say that the purpose of irony is to attack the law, to prove that it is not enough, and to rely on higher. Desade is trying to exchange good and evil using irony for his work. It is based on the concept of good. In other words, the law (nomo, normality) depends on higher ones, such as the form of good. Kant continued to draw a very wide range of strokes and completely changed this arrangement. He did something good in accordance with the law (Nomo). This is autonomous. Like I said here, satire meme burns the fields and tries to grow them with their own grain. We will replace various legal sources with various laws. This desire to exchange a profit for another benefit is not enough to eventually use the satire as a form of resistance. There are many things that can happen throughout life, called irony. Ironically there are three types of contextual sarcasm, dramatic sarcasm, and word sarcasm. Just as you saw a peaceful police arrested, the irony of the situation is the opposite of what happens to people and readers. Then, when the reader knows that the character in the story may not know yet, there is a dramatic sarcasm. - The death of Kate Chopin after the freedom of writing, the short story "One Hour Story" is a death news on the way to a Rui Marad where a woman from the 19th century received her husband Brent Marad in a terrible train accident. Mrs Mallard grieves quickly, but as she realizes independence and free will, her mood changes instantly. Her husband entered the door during her climax of the future The use of irony is an integral part of the episode of "Story and Time" by Kate Chopin. The irony of the situation was used to surprise the reader and added an interesting twist to the discovery of Mrs. Marad of Mrs. Death's death. Dramatic sarcasm is used to familiarize the reader with the situation of Mrs. Marado of his wife. The use of sarcasm helps make the story more interesting, and the end is surprising to the reader.

Rawls proposed a theory of political social contract based on the principle of justice as justice; its aim is to create a procedural principle of "social basic structure". The basic structure of the Rawlsian society includes all the political, social and economic systems of society, and how they are integrated into a unified whole. Principle Rawls states that the first principle of modern systems is "justice is fair", focusing on the distribution of fundamental social goods such as rights, products, obligations, freedoms, how to sing and how to sing are specified I have not. Born in Baltimore, Maryland in 1921, John Rawls is the second son of Baltimore's most influential attorney, William Lee Rolls and his wife, Anna Abel Stewart Rolls. . When young, Rawls and his family were shocked by two tragedies. When he was eight years old, Rawls developed infectious bacterial diphtheria. He recovered but his younger brother infected with a disease from him did not die due to complications. A year later, Rolls suffered from pneumonia. Another brother died of being infected with him. John Bordley Rawls is one of the most influential philosophers of the 20th century. He was born on February 21, 1921, the son of Baltimore, Maryland, William Lee Rolls and Anna Abel (stump). Rawls received a Bachelor of Arts degree from Princeton University in 1943. During World War II, he worked in the military and was stationed in the Pacific Ocean. From 1947 to 1948 he studied at Cornell University and in 1950 received a PhD in Princeton University. In 1949, he married Margaret Warfield Fox with four children. John Rawls is a 20th century American philosopher specializing in the fields of ethics, political philosophy, and law philosophy. Rawls is considered by many as the most important political philosopher of the 20th century and his symbolic "justice" is trying to combine many competitive political theories that are thought to be incompatible It is praised for what he did. In the nineteenth century, political philosophy divided Karl Marx's radical equalityism and concept of individual freedom and freedom acknowledged by John Stuart Mill. Rolls rejected Marx's communism and Mill's utilitarianism, returned to the early modern social contract model, and was influenced by Rock, Rousseau, Hume, and Kant and formed his own theoretical version . Rawls' philosophy has been widely praised, but it produced two books contrary to justice theory.

When questioning the possibility of an aesthetic judgment criterion, we need to consider many different opinions already existing. For centuries, great philosophers like David Hume and Emanuel Kant tried to answer this eternal question. However, understanding and interpretation of art continues to evolve. This makes it difficult to find clear and concise answers. Throughout this article, we will discuss and explain in more detail the previous views and opinions on this point, focusing on the philosopher David Hume's idea, then criticism of Noel Carroll's Hume's philosophy. The discussion on "aesthetics" in daily aesthetics is not unique to this discourse. Whether it is art, nature, pop culture or everyday objects or activities, the essence of aesthetics has always been the focus of long-term discussion in aesthetics. However, in the concept of "aesthetics" in daily aesthetics, at least two points are particularly meaningful and important. The first one is a state of physical experience. When you get sensory stimulation you can feel the smell of baked goods, the silky feel of the skin, the taste of sushi, the feeling of massage and so on. They can also come from physical activity such as running, cutting vegetables, using tools or mowing lawn. Discussion as to whether these physical emotions belong to aesthetics is not new. Part of the misunderstanding of aesthetics lies in the word itself. In its original broadest meaning, aesthetics means pleasure or painful feeling that human beings feel through sensation. In this sense, regardless of coincidence or design, all products have aesthetic appeal. The sound of closing the door, the texture of the control surface, the visual appearance of the software interface information, the smell of plastic and metal, the taste of the medicine: everything is an example of a formal aesthetic element. Over time, aesthetics has a second, more limited meaning as aesthetic research and theory. The psychological, social, cultural and philosophical meaning of aesthetics is a complex and deep subject. One way to understand the state of aesthetics in design is how to guide human perception products.

Author: Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679), British philosopher Wiltshire, scientists and historians. After graduating from Oxford, Hobbes went to the tutor of William Cavendish, the first son of Devon. After that, William became a Diet member and participated in many discussions with Hobbes. During this exposure, Hobbes later wrote articles printed as elements of war, nature and politics. He did not expect this book to be published, but it is well known that this is his first article on political philosophy. Thomas Hobbes vs. Emmanuel Kant Part 1: Thomas Hobbes "Everyone has their own reasons and what can be misused can help him protect his life from his enemies ( Hob) Si, 120) Thomas Hobbes, considered a reasonable egoist, mentioned this in his book "Leviathan". Hobbes believes that people's behavior depends only on the ultimate influence on that person. Our ultimate ethical responsibility comes from our own interests. Thomas Hobbes, Niccolo Machiavelli Thomas Hobbes and Niccolo Machiavelli are the two best philosophers ever. Hobbes was born in England in 1588 when absoluteism dominated Europe. His most famous work is Leviathan written in 1651. Hobbes discusses the ideal state and innate laws like people and nature. Machiavelli was born in Italy in 1469, the homeland was dominated by foreign forces. - Over time, people always want to know what we become reality. Our human nature has always made us interested in the relationship between ourselves and others. Because this curiosity creates various interpretations of our human nature, each interpretation changes the way we see the social world we live in. Each interpretation brings a new understanding of people and their relationship. Thomas Hobbes Introduction Thomas Hobbes looks at humans from a mechanical point of view Life is just a movement of life and we believe that the natural state of mankind will ultimately be a state of war for all people. He tries to prove the monarch's absolute power based on a virtual social contract that individuals try to protect each other by agreeing to obey sovereignty in every problem. - Hobbes Leviathan These are the reasons I think reading Hobbes' Leviathan will help me understand and understand these problems. Hobbes' Leviathan: Analyzing the Impact on Democracy Thomas Hobbes's Leviathan was written in the mid-1600s in the context of the fear of the British civil war and is a discussion of the basic needs of humanity for peace for peace . Unity and safety of civilization

This paper is based on the use of Utilitarian individualism - collectivism, personal personal interests of individuals or dimensions of differences in common interests of groups, and ontological individualism - collectivism, ie the superiority of individuals or groups as a basic society Distinguish dimension. Entity Utilitarian fluctuations have been studied in many studies on individualism - collectivism, but point out that the ontological changes are not drawing much attention from the research, and these two dimensions are the beliefs of the organization It may also affect behavior and behavior. Aftertissivist individualism - After pointing out that the collectivist dimension maps differences in self concept definitions, this paper describes the impact of these differences on organizational motivation and identity research. In this article, in the context of New Zealand, in order to introduce individualism (collectivism) into four ethnic groups (New Zealand, Europe, New Zealand, Maori, Pacific Islands and China), individualism - collectivist interpersonal relationship I will use the evaluation. Discovery of differences at the individual level. Inventory (ICIAI) was developed by Matsumoto, Preston, Brown, and Kuppersbusch (1997). In this survey, we tested the reliability of the ICIAI tool for various ethnic groups and the influence of these ethnic groups on general values ​​and behaviors in three social situations (families, friends, and strangers) did. There were 400 participants (36% NZE, 20.8% Mori, 18.5% Chinese, 14.3% PI). In the context of New Zealand this scale is effective and reliable across cultures, and it helps to develop cross-cultural equivalents for individual differences. This paper is based on the use of Utilitarian individualism - collectivism, personal personal interests of individuals or dimensions of differences in common interests of groups, and ontological individualism - collectivism, ie the superiority of individuals or groups as a basic society Distinguish dimension. Entity Utilitarian fluctuations have been studied in many studies on individualism - collectivism, but point out that the ontological changes are not drawing much attention from the research, and these two dimensions are the beliefs of the organization It may also affect behavior and behavior. Aftertissivist individualism - After pointing out that the collectivist dimension maps differences in self concept definitions, this paper describes the impact of these differences on organizational motivation and identity research. The ancient Greek philosopher Xenophanes apparently appeared in the form of an ontological argument and appeared in works of Parmenides, Plato and Neo-Platonics, but the mainstream view is that its ontological debate is first I believe. It was expressed and developed by Ansem of Canterbury. . Some scholars believe that Islamic philosopher Ibn Sina developed a special ontological argument before Anselm, but other scholars expressed doubts about this position. Daniel Donbrowsky marks the three major stages of the development of the debate: the first explicit expression of Anselm; the criticism of Kant and Hume in the 18th century; and the theory of the proposition of the 20th century philosopher in Anselm The second ontological point

Hello! This is actually a good question, so many people get confused. For the sake of clarity, first of all, let's tell you, once you have determined the context of these two words, sentence, aesthetics and aesthetic, I have the same meaning. Basically I am telling you what spells you can use after deciding what you mean For example ... Like other countries, the color of words spelled the same color, beauty and aesthetics as well. Spelling check aesthetics, by all Federal and European people, use aesthetic and aesthetic use. However, the meaning of the word is slightly different. It is again based on the context of the sentence. Now, let me explain the meaning of each word It refers to the art and aesthetic appearance to attract our sensory ones. Philosophical aesthetics are related to the sense of beauty, in particular in the United States, especially natural appreciation and technology Aesthetics is devoted to beauty and human beauty to enjoy, special words for the cosmetic industry. For example, since birth, everything that is categorized as waxing aesthetics that is eyebrow shaping, aromatherapy, facials, plastic surgery to improve things wrap up. Some parts of the world, it is a matter of priority spelling, in their eyes, it changed the spelling of the aesthetic aesthetic, meaning the same. It has a different meaning but even if it is not very popular ..... aesthetics and aesthetics have some parts of the world occurred The term aesthetics is also aesthetic, so please do not confuse both ways. This is a word that explains someone's idea of ​​what is beautiful. Modern aesthetics or classical aesthetics If you like the way something comes up you think you have an aesthetic appearance. If you want to think about what makes beautiful art, you are interested in aesthetic philosophy. Please enjoy at the branch of philosophy, including aesthetics, arts, beauty and taste of nature. Aesthetics is the core of any artistic quest. "Aesthetic" means "aesthetikos" from Greek "aisthetikos" "Aesthetic sensitivity or feeling." "In fact, the aesthetic judgment refers to sensory contemplation and appreciation (not necessarily work without art) And artistic judgment refers to the recognition of art, appreciation and criticism works Many philosophers will try to solve the concept of beauty and art About Iraq Manuel Kant has an aesthetic experience of beauty, , He believes that roses must agree on the beautiful, if anyone has a lot of the general concept of beauty In the subjective judgment of the universal human truth For example .. Michelangelo's paintings of the Sistine Chapel are widely regarded as beautiful works of art Aesthetics (also called aesthetics or aesthetics) is a field of philosophy including beauty, the essence of art and taste, beauty creation and appreciation. It is scientifically defined as a study of feelings and emotions - the value of feelings, sometimes the judgment of feelings and preferences. More broadly, scholars in this field define aesthetics as "critical reflections on art, culture, and nature". Aesthetics is a field of value theory, a field of philosophy, and closely related to art philosophy. Aesthetics will study a new way to observe and perceive the world

Philosophy and multiculturalism: Sarl, Roty, Taylor Abstract: John Searl opposes because it considers multiculturalism to be part of the movement that impairs the concept of truth and objectivity in the Western tradition. Richard Rorty opposed the relationship between Searle's philosophical truth theory and academic practice, but he was neutral to multiculturalism. Charles Taylor has addressed this problem in history and has defended multiculturalism which emerged in a field of liberal political theory. A more general philosophical commentary on cosmopolitanism and multiculturalism is also provided. Carroll Nicholson compared John Searl's opposition to multiculturalism and Charles Taylor's celebration. As he is neutral to multiculturalism, she uses Richard Rhoty as a triangulation point, but his philosophical analysis of truth and practice is used against Searle to support Taylor I will. At the "Philosophy in Multicultural Background" meeting, Rasmus Winter explored philosophical assumptions and practices related to cosmopolitanism and multiculturalism. He developed Bruno Latour as a concept of philosophers for public diplomats. Philosophy and multiculturalism: Sarl, Roty, Taylor Abstract: John Searl opposes because it considers multiculturalism to be part of the movement that impairs the concept of truth and objectivity in the Western tradition. Richard Rorty opposed the relationship between Searle's philosophical truth theory and academic practice, but he was neutral to multiculturalism. Charles Taylor addressed this problem in history and protected the multiculturalism that appeared from branches Several philosophers like Richard Rorty and Simon Glenn believe that this "analysis and continent" split is bad for the academic field as a whole. Other people like John Searle claim that the continental philosophy, especially the post-structuralistic continental philosophy, should be removed for reasons that it is ambiguous and ambiguous. Analysis and continental philosophy share a common Western philosophical tradition with Emmanuel Kant. Later on, analytic philosophers and mainland philosophers differed in the importance and influence of later philosophers against their respective traditions. For example, the German idealist school developed in Kant's work in the 1880s and 1790s, and finally became highly appreciated Georg William Friedrich Hegel of many mainland philosophers. On the contrary, Hegel is regarded as a relatively small person who analyzes the work of philosophers.

Starting with the new world of European colonial era, the population of Native Americans is decreasing. Throughout the history of the United States, the main purpose of the pioneering white race was to eliminate barbarians in the way necessary to solve the vast landscape of the continent. It was not until the Indian population was almost completely eliminated that American society became interested in indigenous peoples genocide phenomena. Consistent with the trend of society, famous Western novelist Zane Gray announced a work focused on those who are destined to fail. With the historical development of the concept of universal freedom, the scientific construction of the new world building of Europe is waiting for them: this dialectical constellation (transition) is a power struggle between Kant and Hegel worldwide It is the demise of. History requires the rise of European modernity and the emergence of the best area of ​​world order Puritanism, the foundation of my story, represents a strange historical trick. It disappeared. It seems that at the beginning of the 19th century, it withdrew from history. This is a powerful and powerful approach to Protestant Christianity; however historical records indicate that it just disappeared. But it will not disappear, but just changing the shape may be more correct. We really want to understand Lincoln's idea. Like everyone else, I think he is sleeping as well as awake. Sometimes the concept of dream is meaningless; at other times (we all know), they are unprotected, dreamers choose not to think during the day; he is awake waking up Run away when you do. That thought only when he can not stop them What is historical thinking? The American Historical Society outlined "Five C" to explain its process. They are time-varying, background, causality, randomness and complexity. (If you do not understand these meanings when talking about history, we recommend that you click on the link at the beginning of this paragraph and read it immediately, so that you can quickly access short, effective and short commands Is that historical thinking very important? I am here to distinguish between history and thinking history. Most importantly, thinking about history means refusing to materialize things. In other words, refusing virtual people, countries, events, and even ideas is static. Historical thinking helps to analyze errors caused by failures and to avoid understanding how details affect how they change over time. Better historical thought by video game: Why 'Radiation 4' is a better historical game than 'Civilization VI'

Louis XIV reigned the French king for 72 years and made him one of the longest rulers in Europe. He was interested in art and changed French culture from medieval to highest. Rui does not want residual feudalism, he wants absolute monarchy. His goal is to make the monarch the most important political authority. Louis XIV symbolizes absolute monarchy and is a very powerful monarch who helps France gain enormous power. Louis XIV was the first child of Louis XIII, it was Anne of Austria, thought to have been given by God. Louis XIV is indeed a perfect synonym of the absolute monarch. He has the responsibility to make decisions, concentrate power, admire the monarchy, and fully govern the government. All of these prove that Louis XIV is a powerful "dedicated god" dictator. That is why he is a good example of an absolute monarch. Absolute monarchs dominated the policy of absoluteism. Absolatism insists that the King rules over the rights of Buddhism through the undeniable authority that the king legally asserts (French National Building and Louis XIV). Based on this, Louis XIV of France and Suleiman I of the Ottoman Empire are absolute monarchs. Every ruler believes that for his sacred right, his power belongs only to him and to him. - Versailles is a symbol of absolute monarchy. It is cut, elaborate and expensive. An example of the isolation of Louis XVI from other parts of France is that he made a short trip on a trip to the French state, Cherbourg. Recent politicians can not be regarded as being away from the outside world or the elite. It is hated by people Day 2 Political theory: Development of absoluteism theory Louis XIV, magnificent monk. Distribution of electricity and concentration of nobility, monarch and bourgeoisie. Practice of monarchy: So far, a comparison of princes (students choose princes from Eastern Europe and Western Europe to compare with Louis XIV, Elizabeth I and Philip II). René Descartes, Methodology, Galileo Galilei, Letters to Tuscany Christina: Pope's interrogation in 1633: Galileo "Sir Isaac Newton", "Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy" Manuel Kant, What is Enlightenment , Dennis Diderot, "Observations of encyclopedias of art and science" Voltaire, philosophical dictionary: British model, Mary Worthcraft, advocacy of women's rights, Jean Jacques Rousseau Contract

Born in Thomas Hobbs (5 April 1588, Westport, Wiltshire, December 4, 1679, died in Hadwick Hall, Derbyshire), British philosophers, scientists and history, especially his masterpiece Leviathan And the house is known for its political philosophy. (1651) Mr. Hobbs believes that the government is primarily a means to ensure collective security. The rationality of political authority lies in a virtual social contract between many people, it gives sovereignty or subjects the responsibility for the safety and well-being of everyone. In metaphysics, Hobbes defends materialism and believes that only material things are genuine. His scientific research reveals all the observed phenomena as the influence of the substance in motion. Hobbes is not only an independent scientist but also a wonderful systematization of his contemporary scientific discoveries, including Galileo and Johannes Kepler. His long-term contribution is to protect a wide range of government powers based on citizen's self-interest consent as a political philosopher. Hobbes' father was a sullen pastor of a small parish church in Wiltshire. After quarreling at the entrance of his church, he disappeared and gave up three children. He took care of his brother, a wealthy young man from Malmesbury. At the age of four, Hobbes was sent to the Westport School, then to a private school and finally to McDullen University at Oxford University at the age of fifteen. Increased interest in traditional arts degree and maps during his spare time In his almost adult life, Hobbes worked in various branches of wealthy and noble Cavendish families. After acquiring a degree in Oxford in 1608, he was hired as a page and mentor of the young William Cavendish, later became the second generation of Earl of Devon later. For decades, Hobbs provided translators, travel companions, account managers, business staff, political consultants and scientific collaborators to families and colleagues. Through his first employment with Earl William Cavendish and his heirs at Devon, Hobbes joined the royal faction in a controversy between the king and the Diet. British Civil War (1642 - 51). Hobbes also worked for the cousin of William Cavendish of Newcastle and the Marquis of Sir Charles Cavendish, Newcastle's brother. The latter is the center of the informal network of scientists named after the families' house of 'Wellbeck Academy', Wellbeck Abbey in Nottinghamshire. Thomas Hobbs Thomas Hobbs is an important person in contributing to the Constitution. Born on 5th April 1588 in Westport, Wiltshire, England, died on 4 December 1679 in Hadwick, England. Hobbes' uncle sponsored his education at Oxford University. In 1604, Hobbes' father also appointed Thomas Hobbes, left his family, never returned. There are three brothers and sisters, two brothers and one sister in Hobbes. He wrote three major works; De corpore (finally published in 1655) Thomas Hobbs vs. Emmanuel Kant Part 1: Thomas Hobbes "Everyone has their own reasons and what can be abused against him to protect his life against his enemies , 120) "Thomas Hobbes, considered a reasonable egoist, said this in his book Leviathan. Hobbes believes that people's behavior only depends on how they will eventually affect that person. Our ultimate ethical responsibility comes from our own interests. In Thomas Hobbes (/ hɒbz /; April 5, 1588 - December 4, 1679), in some previous text Malmesbury's Thomas Hobbs was a British philosopher and contemporary political philosophy One of the founder of. Hobbes is known for his 1651 "Leviathan". It explains the influential expression of social contract theory. In addition to political philosophy, Hobbes has contributed to various other fields including history, law, geometry, gas physics, theology, ethics, and general philosophy.

Life and way of life If you want to believe liberal philosophers like Sartre, they say that we dominate our destiny and have free will, and how people live their lives You should choose that. In order to live a complete and fulfilling life, what standards must be followed and what goals should be achieved. These questions are questions to be answered when the next group of philosophers discuss different views on what we should do on the planet. Philosophers like Kant believe goodwill is the only unconditional in our life Responsibility leads us and is an important part of our goodwill. Of course, the best way to live a good life is to live a good life. But how do you live a good life? Different views on what constitutes a good life do not seem to converge in the same direction with consensus. Still, most statements are fair and admit that there is a tendency to think that good life should be a meaningful life. All perspectives on better living in the West and the East have continuity of "meaningful life". These two views do not necessarily have the same principle as a way to live meaningful lives, but thinking that serving other people brings more meaning to our lives and ultimately brings happiness It is. Indeed, recent neurobiology studies support that giving aid results in positive psychological results than receiving aid. We are here to send a meaningful life. Although there are various opinions on the purpose of life, it seems that it is the purpose of life that most people think is to lead a meaningful life. But the most interesting questions are: How do you get there? Through psychology from philosophy to religion, there is a treasure house of this viewpoint. However, it seems that more and more discussions tend to be as follows. Influence others and serve. When discussing this issue with my friend on last night's discussion platform, our aim was to leave a legacy leaving a mark not to disappear on the earth. All of this seems to require you to decide what you want to do, then do it with all your heart, and influence people's lives. As long as we are helping, the number of people we influence and the nature of the service is not a problem. Find your passion and use it to help others and actively influence their lives

Real death is what is fearing at a particular point in our life, it ties us as a human, eventually affecting all of us. However, in our consumer-led society, the theme of death is often lost in a busy schedule. Personally I have never dealt with an environment that makes me afraid of life. And there are not many people facing such a huge environment. But in the life of Elliot, people face the fear of death every single day, even in an instant. The reality of our time is not an ancient philosophical reality of the object and the subject. It is a real reality of television, and Donald Trump is that model. Trumps are selfish, constantly derogatory, do not know anything similar to reality, live in a bubble, there is no fact or reasoning, a new subjectiveness realization - the old reality is that the subject Based on the philosophical distinction between the object and the object. For the experientist, the reality is the target. For rationalists and idealists, reality is a theme. For Hegel, reality is the dialectic of the subject and the object. However, the reality of real television is not based on the theme of traditional philosophical meaning: it is based on self, weak self definition, there is nothing else. "Watching" by George Berkeley can be almost a true era motto. However, Berkeley 's radical subjective idealism only makes reality attributable to subjects perceived. Essential Persistence: To be perceived. Today, we have no subject or reality. Only you are perceived by being injured. Ego enum total lesus and ego enim video: I was injured, injured, insulted, offended, because I was seen. These cute Latin phrases become ancient curiosity as problematic self is no longer the subject. Television can not have themes and objects, the camera may always point towards me. In 1781, Emmanuel Kant took over the two reality. Objective Reality and Subjective Reality This hypothesis has been confirmed by neuroscientists. Many people believe that we believe in direct reality, but we are actually aware of indirect reality. This is a reproduction to the reality of the brain. Some people understand that colors exist only in our heads, but in our impression of the black-and-white world our eyes and colors are added by the brain. Unfortunately, black and white is a color perceived visually. Everything we "see" is in the brain. Emily Dickinson's poem talks best

The category of Aristotle's things is called "ambiguous" and they have common names, but the definition corresponding to the name is different. Therefore, the actual male and the person in the picture can be called "animals", but they have common names, but because the definition corresponding to the name is different, they are all arbitrary names . His definition in the case applies only to that situation, in the sense that everyone should define each animal as an animal. Aristotle's classification is a very important philosophical study. Not only is it the pillar of Aristotle's own philosophical theory, it has unparalleled influence on the systems of many great philosophers in the Western tradition. A series of doctrines in this category, which I call classificationism, provides a framework of Aristotle's various philosophical studies, from Aristotle's physics to time theory to metaphysics and even discussions from expansion. He refused Platonic moral philosophy in his ethics at Nikoma. Beyond his own work, Aristotle's taxonomy brought something like primitive man, porphyry, Aquinas, Descartes, Spinoza, Leibniz, Rock, Berkeley, Hume, Kant, Higg. The attention of various philosophers such as Brentano and Heidegger differently accepts, defends, modifies and rejects their central debate. It seems strange to quote Aquinas in articles about Aristotle's category, but I do it for two reasons. First, as Ackrill and Furth commented, Aristotle's plan was severely criticized by scholars and philosophers. But Aquinas' comments on quality shows that a truly talented translator - indeed Aristotle's interpreter is not as big as Aquinas - can satisfy many criticisms. Secondly, and more importantly, Aquinas' attention to quality category suggests its deep historical importance in one of the most important facts of the Aristotle category, ie metaphysical speculative development . In this respect, it can be compared with metaphysical 20th century quantifiers. It is difficult to imagine the analytical metaphysics of the 20th century, regardless of whether the quantifier has the final philosophical significance.

Modernism and postmodernism Modernism understands science as a process of learning, and in order to become truth and reality it is necessary to test and measure everything. Modernists believe that knowledge and expertise ultimately solve problems and pursue progress. The value and sequence of the educators in the classroom and their goal is to measure the test input and output by completing a standardized test. They want to analyze and make learners who can think critically. CC: Your criticism against Benjamin and Adorno points out the difference between the understanding of modernity after the Renaissance and the understanding of modernity since 1848. The arts since 1848 are about daily disillusionment, secularization and sanctity, but fundamentally different from the romantic era from the Renaissance art to the Hegel era. On the other hand, this difference depends on the difference between Kant and Hegel, on the other hand it relies on Marx and should not be understood as a difference in thinking. On the contrary, it is a true historical difference between 1848 and the world after 1848, which requires a completely different attitude towards enlightenment, disillusionment, destruction and recurrence. In this article, we explain the direct relationship between modernism and postmodern in various temporal and spatial contexts, and the similarities between postmodern and modern world. However, the complexity of postmodern world is not over yet. For me, that is just the beginning. Looking forward to finding some relationship, I will release them as soon as possible! thank you for reading Postmodern is a very difficult concept to define. A French philosopher defined Postmodernism as "a suspect of all metanarathies", but this basically means skepticism about all claims of absolute truth. The elements and techniques used by postmodern authors raise doubts about their reading experiences and motivate readers to examine their own understanding of life and social value. - Hundred Years of Solitude - Magical Realism Centuries-old lonely magical realism is a literary form of strange, grotesque and dreamlike stories related, as the events are common. Magical realism is the opposite of the "one at a time" story style, and the writer emphasizes the wonderful quality of imaginary events. In a world of magical realism, the narrator talks about surrealism, so that of course it will be a reality As I said, the story of postmodernism is the response to modernism and contemporary art. There is no fixed definition of postmodern philosophy, but they have some features. The story of postmodern is not limited to one type. They combine several types into what are called closely fitting ones. KTVI provides popular Tamil movie type templates by combining comedy, mystery, tragedy, romance, war, satire, drama. It destroys the genre and structure, making the movies ridiculous. The second feature of postmodern is metafiction or a self-mentioned story. Modernism emphasizes the unique viewpoint of filmmakers, postmoderns attract attention of audiences, but the movie itself is just a movie, through the understanding of the fictional personality of the character, visual effects, or ... . Overall idea Destroying the narrator behind this, or in this case, the Director Parthipen keeps reminding us that this is just a movie

Please relax a little over time. Enjoy paper lightness or surprisingly heavy feeling, ink refreshing, and type regularity. There are over 4 pages on this stack, there are answers to some questions and personal themes. Every philosophy is personal, but some philosophers deny it. Discussed here are philosophers who are not so stupid. The two primitive persistentists, Søren Kierkegaard and Friedrich Nietzsche, are dedicated human observers, but their conclusions are different and seem contradictory. The first two philosophers considered the basis of existentialist movement are Søren Kierkegaard and Friedrich Nietzsche and it was not clear whether to support the existentialism of the 20th century. They focus on subjective human experience, not mathematical and scientific objective truth. Like Pascal, they are interested in using forwarding to apparently eliminate meaningless life and boring quiet struggle for people. Unlike Pascal, Kierkegaard and Nietzsche also consider the role of free choice, especially with regard to basic values ​​and beliefs, and how these choices change the nature and identity of the selector. Knight of Kierkegaard and Übermensch of Nietzsche define the essence of existence, so it is representative of people who show freedom. Article: Post-Kant philosophers reached a definite conclusion about the meaning of human existence in the 19th century. Discussion between Friedrich Nietzsche and Soren Kierkegaard reveals disagreement. Nietzsche believes that in order to live a meaningful life in a world filled with change and confusion, people must force the reality to follow their own creativity. On the other hand, I believe that Kierkegaard can only make a meaningful life only after becoming a "knight of faith". Being alone while keeping your subjective values. With one god In his view, Nietzsche denied the world of modern Christians. When people compare and oppose cultural Christianity and Biblical beliefs, it can be seen in Nietzsche that many people agree to the "collapse" of the Christian world. His contrast with Kirkegaard is evident at this point as Nietzsche did not continue to reintroduce Christianity into the Christian world like the Danish people. Like other existentialists, he cherishes freedom, abandons integration, and insists on self discipline. The power of the country depends on the ability to provide space and benefits to those who do not meet the requirements. There must be freedom to question the recognized value of Superman who succeeded only in self-discipline

Socrates of the Republic of Plato is usually working on dialogue with people who claim to be experts on ethical issues. By asking simple questions Socrates gradually revealed that these people were indeed very confused and did not really understand what they claim to be experts. Morality is a moral problem raised by the Republic of Plato. Socrates believes that Cephalus, Polemarchus and Thrasymachus respond to morality. When Socrates and Kefalls were wealthy old people talking about money, a moral problem emerged. The morality of the master-slave is the central theme of Friedrich Nietzsche's work, especially the first article of "moral lineage". Nietzsche believes that there are two basic types of morality: "dominant morality" and "slave morality". Masters of pride and power of moral value, slavery morality appraises goodness, consideration, compassion. Unlike the morality of slavery, morality of ethics measures good or bad outcome behavior (ie classical virtue and vice, resultism) and the morality of a slave weighs the behavior of a good malicious image (Example: Christian's virtue and vice, Kant morality) Master is the creator of morals; slaves use the morals of their slaves to respond to their morals. Unlike Master's morality (emotion), the morality of a slave is based on the revaluation of feelings, that is, the devaluation of master and slave. Since the moral of the Lord began with a strong man, the morality of a slave began with the weak. Since the morality of slavery is a response to oppression, it will destroy oppressors. The morality of slavery is the opposite of the master's morality. Therefore, it is characterized by pessimism and sneer. The emergence of slave morality go against the "good" of the master's moral values. Nietzsche believes that there are two types of morality. Active morality that actively appears from "nobility" and slave morality developing reactively in the weak. These two ethics do not show a simple reversal of each other. Moral ethics incorporates action into the "good" or "bad" outcome, and the morality of slaves incorporates the behavior into the "good" or "bad" intent. To my surprise, he looked down on both, even if the first one was considerably less than the second one.

In "Enlightenment: Britain" and Roy Porter's book "Creation of the Modern World" he explains how Britain is influenced by social, economic and cultural enlightenment. Porter 's argument about British enlightenment shows the importance of this era, and is often devalued in the history of enlightenment as other, more important and famous industrial revolution like the United States. Indeed, the essence of Potter's argument is that Britain has energetic and appropriate enlightenment, just as research is increasing in other parts of France and Europe. Free, tolerance, Enlightenment has long been welcomed as the foundation of modern Western politics and knowledge culture. Enlightenment introduced democratic values ​​and institutions and brought political modernization to the West in establishing modern liberal democracy. This paper is widely accepted by scholars in English-speaking countries and has been strengthened by extensive research by Robert Dunton, Roy Porter, and recently by Jonathan Israel. . John Locke is one of the most influential enlightenment thinkers and his governance philosophy is based on the theory of social contract. In 1651, British philosopher Thomas Hobbes started a new discussion at his work Leviathan. Quicksilver is the first volume of a very long history novel about modern science, modern business, modern politics and creating enlightenment. It is written in 17th century arched sounds (John Bath resembles the sound used by his classic "weed factor." Reading it does not matter how fast you read, It will take time! Do you want a baroque bicycle to put in your leisure bedding that does not listen? (I will keep track of - I like that entirely, I read twice) American enlightenment was generally debated based on the political evolution of the United States. Many of the letters related to enlightenment were thought to have influenced American thought between 1760 and 1800. Among them are John Rock, Thomas Hobbes, Voltaire, Baron Montezu, Emmanuel Kant, Adams Miss, Dennis Diderot. The United States has its own number of Enlightenment, among which the most famous are Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, James Madison, Alexander Hamilton. However, many American historians discovered the origin of American enlightenment in the thought of Roger Williams.

Machine Translation Overview This article provides an overview of Machine Translation (MT). Since the 1950's, many research groups have been investigating the original idea of ​​MT, and many MT systems have been created and developed around the world. Three ways of MT system: direct translation, transfer, and language-to-language method is a common system. The main idea of ​​the direct translation method is to replace words with words before converting the structure from source language (SL) to target language (TL). Machine translation (MT) automatically translates text from one natural language (source language) to another language (target language) using machine capabilities. The idea of ​​using a machine for translation was first proposed by Warren Weaver in 1949. Machine translation has been done for a long time (from the 1950's to the 1980's) by examining the language information of the source language and the translation language, and generating a translation based on the dictionary. And the grammar is called Rule Based Machine Translation (RBMT). Along with the development of statistics, statistical models became applied to machine translation, and translation was generated based on an analysis of bilingual text corpus. This approach, known as Statistical Machine Translation (SMT), achieved superior performance than RBMT and dominated over the 1980s and early 2000s. Their research laid the foundation for the future application of neural networks in machine translation. Machine translation usually uses phrase-based statistical methods, but neural networks are rapidly becoming dominant. My favorite architecture is trained in a multilingual environment where a single model has been translated from any source language to any target language and has been set to be weakly supervised (or not fully supervised). Game Although the clearly written Go program has been developed for a long time, AlphaGo Zero, ConvNet, which examines the original state of the board, is currently the most powerful player in the game. I hope that you will get very similar results in other fields such as DOTA 2 and StarCraft. Machine translation between languages ​​is an example of a rule-based machine translation method. In this approach, the source language, ie the text to be translated, is converted to an inter-language language, which is an independent "language neutral" representation between languages. Next, we generate a target language from an intermediate language. The main advantage of this system is that as the number of languages ​​that can be converted to a target increases, the value of the intermediate language increases. However, the only inter-language machine translation system operating at the commercial level is the KANT system (Nyberg and Mitamura, 1992), which aims to translate Caterpillar Technical English (CTE) into other languages.

Rada Krishnan 's Thought and Existentialism Abstract: It is trying to show similarity between Rada Krishnan and existentialist thinkers. Radhakrishnan's philosophy is to reconstruct and reconstruct Sankara's Advaita Vedanta based on modern scientific knowledge and skills. Existentialism is an attitude and perspective emphasizing the existence of human beings. For Radhakrishnan, humans are essentially subjects, not subjects. Existentialists argue that humans are not known objects, but subjects. In this article we will explore the contacts of Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan (1888-1975) and their correspondence to three monotheistic forms of Christianity, Hinduism, and Muslim. This article is an encounter between Rada Krishna and Christian monotheism in early education of Christian missionary schools, ii) Rabindranath · Tagore's "monotheism of Hinduism", and iii) Article 1923 "Islam and India Understanding the monotheism of Rada Krishnan Islam in "Thought of the Lord". The author began his research on the formation and research of Radhakrishnan's 1908 master's thesis. This paper suggests that Radhakrishnan respond differently to these monotheistic traditions, as he understands these traditions. Radhakrishnan criticized each of these traditions, but still allowed them to contribute to the development of their religious ideas. Therefore, the interpretation of these traditions by Rada Krishnan reflects the development of his own religious thought. Radhakrishnan's earliest childhood and little knowledge of education. Rada Krishnan rarely talks about his life. Radhakrishnan, born in Tirutani of Andhra Pradesh, became a family of Brahmin and may be a wise person of religion. Tiltani is mainly a Hindu temple town and popular pilgrimage site, and Radhakrishnan's family actively participates in spiritual activities. Advaita, which is implicitly accepted by saṅkara through the tradition of Smarta, is a good proof that the excellent framework is important but potentially characteristic of Radhakrishnan's early philosophy and religious feelings. Two important influences of Madhaks Christian College Radhakrishnan left a sign that remained in the emotions of Radhakrishnan. First of all, Radhakrishnan is trained here in European philosophy. Radhakrishnan was featured in Berkeley, Leibniz, Locke, Spinoza, Kant, J.S. Philosophical mill, Herbert Spencer, Fichte, Hegel, Aristotle and Prato et al. Radhakrishnan also introduced the philosophical and theological aspects of his master's programmer and professor A. G. Hogg, the most influential non-Indian tutor. Hogg is a missionary of the Scottish Presbyterian Church and is trained under the guidance of Albrecht Trier's theology and philosopher Andrew Sessinger / Patterson. As a student of Arthur Titius, he is a student of Albrecht Ritschl, using Ritschlian to distinguish religious values, emphasizing subjective perception and theoretical knowledge, and trying to discover the essence of the ultimate reality.

The French-French relationship between free French fries and Chanel boycott should not be seen as an attitude of an American boy's isolated boys. On the contrary, the internal response to French passive behavior trying to catch up with Iraq 's entry into the Iraqi regime should be resolved not as a simple constitution but as a distrust of the substantial composition of Americans. Country of French Kant, "Traitor Cowboy" George W. Bush is a curse to a country that is better suited for shades of gray than American black-and-white lenses. The relationship between state and religion varies from country to country. Various methods often appear in the Constitution. Article 1 of the French constitution regulates the barren nature of the French state. The founding provision of the first Amendment of the Constitution of the United States not only prohibits the establishment of the Church but also prohibits the broader meaning that appears later. Article 140 of the "German Constitution" refers to some provisions of the Constitution of the Weimar Republic, but on the one hand it prohibits the establishment of a church while religious sects are permitted by the state There. Of course, in the UK, the British National Church is a mature church. In the Netherlands, separation of church and state is considered not a principle of constitutional principle. The broad subject of the Constitution deals with interpretation and enforcement of the Constitution of the United States. Since the Constitution is the foundation of the United States of America, the constitution covers part of the basic relationship of our society. This includes the relationship between the three branches (administrative, legislative, and justice) of the state, state, federal and federal government, and the rights of individuals with federal and state governments. The field of judicial review is an important subject of the constitution. The Supreme Court played an important role in the interpretation of the Constitution. Therefore, the research on the Constitution focuses on the Supreme Court's ruling.

Because she is a stranger of the Traore family, Sira is in the most interesting position among the hero. This is Dousika's second wife, Nieli, and some members of the Traore family like her own qualities. Even after letting Dousika give birth safely, she finally weakened his passive attitude. The relationship with her other family is very different, and this is unique and seems affectionate to Dousika's first wife, Nya. Seary of Maryse Conde uses a concrete illustration of Mary Se Conde's novel Segu. This discusses how the impact of Islam on Bamber society affects people's traditions, political, social and economic practices. Before Muslims arrived, Segu and his people, Bambaras, were very different from their world under the rule of Islam. - One of the biggest problems in the sexual reproduction of animals is conflicts of interest between women and species men. For example, multiple crosses have been shown to greatly improve the fertilization rate of men, but recent studies have shown that multiple crosses are also beneficial for women. The book "Segu" is a novel written by Maryse Conde. This novel was created in 1797 and tells the story of Africans of that era. Interestingly, Kant was able to create a novel that made her character life the most visible evidence of the lives of people living in Mari. Clearly, the issue of religion, norms and tradition is explained as an important aspect of society that affects the people of Old Mali. Thanks to Kant's wonderful story, I was fascinated by Mari's character and history In Novel Segu, Maryse Conde beautifully constructed a personal and depth image of the history of Africa, using the four protagonists depicting the family's struggle and importance in today's Mari. These four characters with names of Tiecolo, Shiga, Nava, Maropari and their brothers face the world of their beloved town, Bambara, with the new custom of Islam and the development of European business and slave trade. - Early in the 20th century, except for one country, Africa as a whole went to the hands of Europeans. Despite all the factors of these countries Ethiopia defended the Italians in Adwa's battle in 1896. Unfortunately, when the Italians invaded the second time in 1935, the Ethiopians were not so successful. Why did Ethiopia defeat when they won 50 years ago?

American philosopher John Rolls and European philosopher Victor Frankel are highly appreciated by their philosophical wisdom. When Rawls focused on justice theory, Frankel's work was moving in a direction to find meaning in life. Although their work takes a different direction, their work is clearly correlated as they are related to moral and moral development. Rawls talked about the four roles of political philosophy, including the following, in his writings. 1) Practice - Discover rationale for rational discussion. The philosopher who supports the contractual moral philosophy is Harvard philosopher John Rawls, whose "justice theory" is the most influential philosophical ethical text of the past 30 years. The contractual approach of Rawls is completely different from Gosier and Herman's approach in that it is inspired by Rock, Rousseau and Kant, not from Hosible. Rawls first considered the parties' initial position to consider the correct code of conduct that would be universally applicable in society. In the negotiations, the political party is just, that is, the interests of all people equal. It is guaranteed by the so-called ignorative veil which hides its own knowledge of the contractor. Behind ignorance, I do not know race, sex, social class, nationality. Perhaps the most powerful concept of moral philosophy is the "vulgar of ignorance" advocated by John Rawls. Imagine you must develop a social law that prevents you from knowing who you are in the world when you face veil (politician, beggar, businessman, refugee, everyone knows Absent). Rawls said that it is only in this veil of ignorance that people can truly develop the law of justice. Revealing these concepts at university will make people more aware of the potential threat posed by their ideas and will be responsible for their actions. Everyone must have their own moral values. This is very important in the world where innovative technology inventions are announced every month.

An example of his idea is as follows. (Chapter 11) Happiness is a continuous improvement of desire from one thing to another, acquisition of things is only a way to the next. The purpose of human desire is not to only enjoy it once but to ensure that all male voluntary actions and trends tend to acquire and guarantee a central life. The desire of praise gives people acts commendable - actions that satisfy those who seek judgment they appreciate. Thrift makes it impossible for men to succeed in action that requires the power of many men at the same time. Age of Enlightenment (or Age of Enlightenment or rationality) is an intellectual cultural movement that began in Western Europe in the second half of the 17th century, emphasized reasons and individualism, not tradition, until the end of the 18th century in Europe and America It spread inside. Its purpose is to transform society rationally, to challenge ideas based on traditional ideas and beliefs, to develop knowledge in a scientific way, promote scientific thinking, skepticism, knowledge exchange is. Many critical thinkers believed that religion and reason are hostile in the age of enlightenment in the 17th and 18th centuries. For them, the Middle Ages or the "era of faith" is therefore the opposite of the era of reason. Kant and Voltaire were attacking the Middle Ages as an era of religious decline, and gibbons in the "history of decline and decline of the Roman Empire" expressed contempt for 'dark aged garbage'. But like Petrarch, he saw himself at the cutting edge of the "new era" and criticized it for centuries before his own time, as was the enlightenment writer . After centuries of medieval religious doctrine, skepticism reappeared at the end of the Renaissance era, especially in the era of reason and in the era of the 17th and 18th centuries. French Michel de Montagne (1533 - 1592) and British Francis Bacon all had skepticism as a starting point, but they did not know anything about Blaze Pascal and Rene de Carte. Faith Montaigne especially questioned the implicit premise that the overall construction of the educational system and philosophers who received university education are smarter than uneducated farm workers. The philosophical tradition of the United States from the 17th century to the early 18th century was clearly characterized by the religious theme and the theoretical basis of Ramos' reform, but in the 18th century the 18th century was a new learning of science, the age of enlightenment, It depended more on belief in. Ethics of education and moral philosophy, economics of free abandonment, and new attention to political problems to achieve human integrity. Samuel Johnson is known as the "founder of American philosophy" and is "the first important philosopher of America in colonial times and the author of the first philosophical textbook published there." He is not only interested in philosophy and theology, but also interested in the educational theory and knowledge classification system he used to write encyclopedia, develop university courses, and create library classification system I have.

Rousseau has many thoughts on how society as a whole should function. His point is about those who demand freedom. With this freedom, we do not theoretically compare ourselves, or try to improve ourselves better than others. His other key ideas include the notion of general will and collective sovereignty. These show that society and the government should enjoy common wishes and work together as a coherent unit. Rousseau has several famous books, one of which is a social contract. From the 18th century to the 19th century, the most important elements of political idealism were the contract theory of John Rock and Jean-Jacques Rousseau, as well as the thinkers of Adam Smith, Jeremy Bentham, John Stuart Mill It appeared in liberalism philosophy. These thinkers have created idealists called political liberalism. Liberalism emphasizes that consensus is the basis for legitimate political authority and it is a limited constitutional government as the basis for human rights. As liberalism dominates contemporary political and economic theory, international relativists often define the idealistic tradition as liberalism. Liberalism has many forms and derivatives, but those core concepts meaningful to life can be traced back to three main points. Early thinkers such as John Locke, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Adam Smith, etc. started with human beings in nature, found meanings of existence through labor and property, and used social contracts to create an environment supporting these efforts It was. Kantism is a philosophy based on Immanuel Kant's ethics, epistemology and metaphysical writings. Kant is known for his moral theory, and there is a moral obligation, a "classification order" arising from the concept of responsibility. Kantian believes that all actions are done in accordance with basic maxims and principles, and that they must be ethical and must abide by absolute orders. Jean-Jacques Rousseau was born in 1712 as the son of independent Calvinism city Geneve, Isaac Rousseau, Suzanne Bernard. Rousseau's mother died on 9th birthday, Rousseau grew up from his father and received education until he was ten years old. Isaac Rousseau is a minority ethnic group of residents of Geneva and enjoys the status of the citizen of Geneva which is the position of Jean-Jacques. According to the story after Rousseau, the random education he received from his father included planting the Republican patriotism and reading a classical writer like Pultak dealing with the Roman Republic. After his father exiled in the city to avoid arrest, Jean - Jacques was taken care of by a nearby Bossi pastor, followed by apprenticeship sculptures. Mme de Warens made Rousseau arrange a trip to Turin and convert it to Roman Catholic in April 1728.

Regarding ethical and philosophical issues of value and duty, I recall the difference between meta ethics and normative ethics. Normative ethics includes great ethical issues, for example it is inherently good. What is our moral obligation? The former ethics theory contains philosophical issues of morality. It is a value or a moral obligation. Is there a moral fact? What kind of objectivity is there in ethics? How can I gain moral knowledge? Recall the fundamental dilemma of meta ethics. Moral philosophy is divided into meta ethics and norm ethics. Normative ethics focuses on the substantial ethical issues that we all face, such as "what is worth" and "what is moral obligation." It is itself. Instead of "valuable things" and "what can be done", instead of "what can be done" "value" indicates a systematic approach to integration using the phrase "philosophical ethics". Meta - ethics and normative ethics projects attempt to gain insight as to what value and obligations are valuable and mandatory (normative) by understanding (in language). When I read them, a wonderful systematic ethical philosophy like Aristotle, Kant, and Mill's philosophy can all be regarded as an example of philosophical ethics. As a subject of philosophy, ethics can be divided into theoretical and practical ethics. Theoretical ethics focuses on the origin, reason, and evaluation of ethical values, and may be attributed to meta ethics and normative ethics. Meta - ethics seeks to determine (1) the meaning of moral concepts and phrases and (2) the true conditions of moral statements, in particular whether these statements can be unethical or logical. Meta - ethics then focuses on moral language and analyzes. Common meta ethical problems include the following. A moral word in English refers to several things. It can refer to philosophical ethics or moral philosophy - projects that attempt to reasonably answer various ethical questions. As written by a British philosopher, Bernard Williams, I will try to explain the moral philosophy: "What makes philosophical explore is the generality of reflexes and the style of discussion that argues rationality and persuasion It is. In this article, I explain the content of this research field as solving a very wide problem of "how people should live". Morality refers to human ability to think together about ethical issues that are not unique to philosophy. Bioethicist Larry Churchill wrote as follows. "Ethics understood critically of moral values ​​and understood as the ability to guide actions based on these values ​​is a universal human capability." It also means that people's own principles and customs It can also be used to explain. Example: "Joe has strange morality."

Fichte's subjective idealism Using his dramatic dialectical style, Fichte explained his subjective idealism. Starting with the problem of free will, Fichte concluded that no one was involved in the mysterious soul until philosophical dialogue with the essence of Fichte's knowledge. Finally, Fichte cursed the Holy Spirit to reveal the tough facts. "All reality is a wonderful dream and I can not dream of my dream life." Ask a question to Fi Schelling (1775-1854) argues that Fichte's "I" requires Not-I as there is no object subject. So there is no difference between subjectivity and objectivity, ie ideal and reality. This is the "absolute identity" of Schelling. Thoughts and spiritual imagery in your mind are the same as extended objects outside your mind. Absolute idealism is G. W. F. Hegel's explanation of how existence is understood as a comprehensive overall. Hegel called his philosophy "absolute" idealism, in stark contrast to Berkeley's "subjective idealism" and Kant and Fichte's "transcendental idealism". Hegel's idealism is criticism of the historical dialectic philosophy. In the late eighteenth century Emmanuel Kant's transcendental idealism and German idealism (Ficht, Hegel, Schelling) were blocked. The combination of Kant's critical philosophy and Leibniz 's rationalism can be seen in John Friedrich Herbert (1776 - 1841) and his critical school' s realism. When Leipnitz's article kept in Hannover became possible in the 1830s, Leibniz 's new interest appeared soon. It can be said that the opening ceremony triggered Leibniz research in Germany (Glockner 1932, 60 years). The pioneer of this research period was the first editor of this paper. Interest in linguistics is central, but you can observe interest in Leibniz logic. The next piece must be named. Gottschalk Eduard Guhrauer (1809 - 1854) Edit Shriften of Germany (Leibnitz 1838/40)

Choose the two philosophers we read and compare them with those most important to you. It is one. Use a reference to the text to explain the idea clearly. Bay shows that these philosophers agree with this particular view (eg, each of these philosophers agree ... a reference in the text to prove that this is the case Use the). Do you agree with the view presented by the philosopher? Why. The two philosophers I chose were Kant and Thoreau, and transcendence. The transcendental theory is defined by the Webster Dictionary as a philosophical emphasis on a priori conditions of knowledge and experience, or for ignorance or emphasis of the final reality. In his details of Libin de Causis (Lect. 1), Aquinas described a series of philosophical studies: logic, mathematics, natural philosophy (physics), moral philosophy, and finally metaphysics. The reality that is first considered in this course is the physical world. (At the beginning of the next century, John Duns Scotus criticized Thomas who tried to build his metaphysics and his method on the basis of physics.) The interpreter is the order to follow when Aquinas himself learns philosophy It is arguing whether to think or not. Or did he just report on how the philosopher taught it? In any case, the philosophical study of moving objects in Aristotle's sense is important for Aquinas. His works (De Principiis Naturae, Part 2 of Summa Contra Gentiles, De Aeternitate Mundi's paper) have considerable personal consideration for the world's bodies. Between the 1970s and the 1980s more and more moral philosophical literature brought a rational approach to animal therapy ethics. Such a first book is Peter Singer's Animal Liberation (1975), and my book "Animal Rights and Human Morality" (Rollin, 1981), Tom Reagan's Animal Rights Case (1983) and "Moral, rational and animals" of Steve Sapo Qi Si (1987). These books discuss animal studies from the perspective of moral theory, and claim a higher animal moral status. In particular, I pointed out that eliminating animals from our moral mechanisms and concepts is logically unreasonable for two reasons. "Revised" environmental philosophy is the use of important concepts and theories of normative philosophy, but extends it to include nonhuman animals in the moral community. It is accomplished by giving moral status (or moral status) to non-human animals. "Animal ethics" is such a revised position (see the Animal Morals section). Feminist animal ethicists oppose the same practices (eg agriculture, biopsy, hunting at the factory). Neither is a feminist two animal ethics version, Utilitarian version of Peter Singer (1975) and right wing version of Tom Regan (1982). Singer object against these customs. Because they bring unnecessary suffering and suffering to all beings. Reagan opposed them because they violated what he calls "the theme of life" of the right of life. However, feminist animal ethics is a further step forward by providing a gender perspective on such practices and animal protection (see feminist animal ethics care described in section 3.8).

As everyone lies to get what they want, people no longer trust each other, so communication can not be trusted. To trick someone into deceiving someone, the one he deceives must assume that he is telling the truth. But fraud does not allow men to get what they want because men think that they are willing to be in a world where it is impossible to deceive someone. This is an example of a conceptual inconsistency. When maxims are generalized, you can not succeed a maxim that deceives others and gets what they want. The absolute order formulation is to act so that maxims can be applied as universal laws. People must act according to the motto of action as if it were a universal natural law. The principle of deciding behavior is not based on the purpose of action but on the universal ability of maxims. In Kant's ethics, the principle that is the main guide is called "absolute order", which is also known as the official of the universal law or the official of the demining country. An important feature of absolute ordering is that it builds the universality of good, but there may be exceptions and only those can be generalized (Beauchamp, Bowie, & Arnold, 2008). Moral rules should be based on premises of rational and reasonable subjects, not humanity and conscience (Beauchamp, Bowie, & Arnold, 2008). Human intention, motivation, will, and behavior are morally related and more important than the result. When considering taking action, individuals must ask if they can imagine their behavior as a general rule for everyone. If a person makes a decision that is wise and unenforceable from a sense of responsibility for moral law and does not have external authority, that person's behavior has moral value. There are several versions of "Classification Command", but there are three differences. That is, the first, the universal official formula, the second, the human official, and the third, autonomous official. The universal law means that people should behave this way, using the Code of Conduct as a universal code of conduct. This is the principle that inspires goodwill, Kant thinks it is the basic principle of all morals. The second law is not merely a means but acts only in ways that you can treat others as your goals. Simply put, we treat others as respectable people. In the third law, we are required to behave ethically as if we are establishing a general law that governs others under similar circumstances.

Nonetheless, the empirical view of knowledge on which positivism is based has long been limited. Immanuel Kant points out that knowledge comes not only from sense, but also from the basic conceptual knowledge tray we have. In addition, the interpretation of observation may differ depending on the way each person understands the concept. The claim by Staman and Slob (2012) above analyzes the use of this scientific view below. Assuming that true knowledge is only observable or inductive, all of the above claims (k1, k2, and k3) are affected by reliability problems. Analysis: Analysis is where you present evidence. It should explain how evidence supports sentences and how to support your view on the topic, which may not be obvious to the reader. Think about the analysis as answering this question. The following is an example of a paragraph using the C - E - A format. In this paragraph, claims are underlined, the evidence is italicized, and the analysis is shown in bold. (To save space, it is not 2/3 of the length of the page.) At the end of this section is the entire development paragraph. The main paragraph provides the main points; the paper organization supports the paper with evidence including analysis of the evidence by the author. The body constitutes most of the content of the article. A good article should include three major paragraphs, the first paragraph explaining the topic and further development. The following sentences should provide definitive evidence to explain the argument of the paper. Other paragraphs provide examples of ongoing support for assertions and providing specific information. In the last paragraph of the article, we need to further support this assertion and consider other claims using strong evidence to convince the audience. There are papers and assertions somewhere, but the paper lacks consistent development and evidence application. In insurance claims there is a lack of clarity of definition, lack of clarity of de facto claim details, lack of analysis, grade and application value, or lack of imagination and procedural details. By using the expertise of the journal, the research showed that the best book on subjects, as well as case studies related to timely articles, interviews, field surveys and topics are deep. Consider all aspects, especially viewpoints that violate the author's argument. Policy analysis is an important discipline for researchers, officials who formulate or evaluate policy implementation, health advocates, research journalists, and other policymakers. The main capabilities of policy analysis include skills to develop best practices, literature reviews, analysis of existing policies to identify areas in need of new policies, policy barriers or inconsistencies between policies, programs and international Latest information on best practices Knowledge can draft policy recommendations and compare policy choices and tradeoffs. Analysts also need financial analysis skills to estimate the cost of policy selection. Policy analysis requires skills to understand decision makers' willingness to make decisions, communication skills, stories to support policy selection, and advocacy techniques that will allow the government to take responsibility for policy decisions.

Dunciad: Simulate the epic. The fourth book by Honor English Dunciad explains the collapse and slow death of the British society that taught him everything he knows. He criticized his critics, accusers and various Sayers in his allegorical poem. It uses a word carefully, draws inspiration from higher powers, and points out the shortcomings of the social order that can not choose or choose rather than use his work to tell a story, so it is imitation It symbolizes an epic. Look at what they are doing. "The Lock of Rape" is a poem written by Pope Alexandre and uses Horatian's satire to satire the trivial things of the hair cut off from the head of a woman without her knowing. The Pope wrote this poem in an epic way imitated to help disregard this small event. The Pope used epic customs and techniques in his fake epic. These techniques include well-explained heroes, use of supernatural creatures, and explanations of trivial things to fight. - Social satire in Pope 's "Rape of Rape" A unique use of the satire and ridicule by Pope Alexandre emulates Ulysses' Ilead, makes it more socially dramatic and induces many rhetoric . The Pope's "Rock of Rape" shows many interesting features that can be easily understood in early English literature. Through close supervision and inspection of Iliad you can see the psychic intent and the similarity of twist and turn of several different conspiracy. At the beginning of "Rock of Rape", the Pope called this work "heroic ridiculous poetry." Today, this poem and something similar - known as a simulated epic, sometimes called a simulated hero. . Such a work imitates the serious and elegant style of classical epics - ridiculing human foolishness like such Homer's "Iliad" and "Odyssey". Therefore, simulating an epic is ironic; it just treats small humans and trivial events as abnormal or heroes, like the great heroes and events of two great epic of Homer. When writing 'Rock of Rape', the Pope imitated the characteristics of Homer's epic and the later epics such as Aenei (Virgil), Devine (Dante), Lost Paradise (Milton). Some of these features are listed below "Epic Terms". In "Rock of Rape", Pope Alexander used this epic format to satire the British society of the 18th century. Belinda, the protagonist of the imitated epic, depicts women's duality as materialist and pure creatures. This socially determined duality shows a contradictory value. Belinda's duality showed the best performance at the end wash scene in Kant I. In this scene, she plays the magnificent hero ready to fight, but she is only ready for this day. - Reviewing past events may make people aware that they are not important. At some point, this event seems to be the only important thing, and in the next event, it is easy. If it exists, the event succeeds, or negligible indignation ends. In "Rock of Rape", Pope Alexander explained the situation. Using simulated epics, the Pope can use contrasting situations to show that certain events are not important (Brown 4)

God's Comedy: Dante took up Greek culture hell and since he was founded, Greek heroes and their stories have found an eternal house in the minds and imaginations of everyday people. So they grew to new heights through art and literature. Dante Alighieri contains prominent Greek letters in his "Comedy of God". From famous philosophers and characters filled with Lingbo to the last inner circle in which the giants lived, Dante punished them with images of various evils to make famous Greek monsters, enthusiasts, and heroes To do. Dante's Divine Comedy is one of the most famous and influential literary works in history, Hell in Divine Comedy, and Dante's supervision through Hell Guide is most famous. This summer I will study Dante 's Inferno and plan to move to other parts of this story next year. Like last week, I was vacant in the summer list, I would like to fill it with the novels of the 1980s and raise the theme of literature in July. Since 1980 's, I asked members of the reading book group' Great Books About Great Books' to listen to my favorite novel. I got a lot of wonderful advice, but the title, a wonderful and completely unique book mentioned by many readers made me very excited. God's Comedy: Dante took up Greek culture hell and since he was founded, Greek heroes and their stories have found an eternal house in the minds and imaginations of everyday people. So they grew to new heights through art and literature. Dante Alighieri contains prominent Greek letters in his "Comedy of God". From famous philosophers and characters filled with Lingbo to the last inner circle in which the giants lived, Dante punished them with images of various evils to make famous Greek monsters, enthusiasts, and heroes To do. Avoid the pain of hell. The famous Italian poet Dante Alighieri writes about the physical depiction of hell and the punishment of all sinners against their sins. The comedy of God records the journey of Dante from the depth of hell to the glory of heaven, but it contains a deeper meaning. Through his motif, interaction with sinners, and other literary works and hell combinations, Dante reveals the true meaning of hell. "Inferno's Kant 18's Dante Alighieri's iterative theme, Marcel Proust once said that Rao us ..." A trip to explore wisdom through wild is happening at The Inferno of Dante Alighieri. Inferno is the first part of a trilogy called epic, god comedy. Inferno talks about the narrator

In the work "Utilitarianism" by John Stuart Mill, Mueller offered evidence of his moral theory Utilitarianism and tried to challenge all opposing opinions against it. Mill defines Utilitarianism as "the theory that the theoretical basis is" the behavior is correct because there is a tendency to promote happiness, so it tends to produce reversal of happiness "(chapter 2, page 7 ). He called it the principle of maximum happiness. "In addition to the fact that everyone wants their own well-being, there is no reason why general well-being is desirable, as long as he thinks that it can be achieved. Utilitarianism by John Stuart Mill, originally published as three independent papers in 1861 and then published as a collection in 1863, is one of the most famous Utilitarian ethics tests so far. Long-term debate about ethical tradition opens sentences. And there is a general lack of great progress. He could not reach any agreement on the philosopher's decision to be "right" or "wrong", understanding of society's morals remained unchanged in the study of philosophy over generations of generations I pointed out. He explains this lack of change by implying that all morals have a philosophical basis, and this foundation is Utilitarianism: moral action promotes happiness without happiness and pain It is a belief. Utilitarian philosopher John Stuart Mill criticized Kant as it does not recognize that moral law is proved by moral intuition based on utilitarian principles (maximum maximum profit is sought Should be). Muller believes that Kant's morality can not explain why specific behavior is wrong without relying on Utilitarianism. As a basis of morality, Mill believes that his utility principle has a stronger intuitive foundation than Kant's dependence on reason, and why explaining better why specific behavior is wrong or wrong I can. Utilitarian believes that behavior is morally correct only if action is maximizing (or minimizing what is worst). Classical Utilitarians (and many modern Utilitarians) such as Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill consider "beauty" as happiness or happiness. Therefore, in this view, behavior is morally correct only if action maximizes happiness or happiness or minimizes pain. Rule Utilitarianism mitigates behavior by establishing moral rules - Utilitarian burden on practical reasoning leads to best results when moral rules follow. Rule Utilitarianism can be explained by the rule "do not kill". In principle, if we all obey the rules, we will be better, that we will have the best results and happenings. Please do not kill. "

According to its definition, irony is a rhetorical or literary technique that conveys the underground meaning which is completely opposite to the literal meaning of its obvious words. Writers use this technique to remind the reader to reconsider the problem of the author. Jonathan Swift casts what he calls a "moderate proposal" among "modest proposals". Mark Twin also expressed his passion for war and his patriotism in his war prayer. The problem of my ironical analysis is that I think that this irony is misunderstood. Nodding to Deleuze, I would say that the purpose of irony is to attack the law, to prove that it is not enough, and to rely on higher. Desade is trying to exchange good and evil using irony for his work. It is based on the concept of good. In other words, the law (nomo, normality) depends on higher ones, such as the form of good. Kant continued to draw a very wide range of strokes and completely changed this arrangement. He did something good in accordance with the law (Nomo). This is autonomous. Like I said here, satire meme burns the fields and tries to grow them with their own grain. We will replace various legal sources with various laws. This desire to exchange a profit for another benefit is not enough to eventually use the satire as a form of resistance. There are many things that can happen throughout life, called irony. Ironically there are three types of contextual sarcasm, dramatic sarcasm, and word sarcasm. Just as you saw a peaceful police arrested, the irony of the situation is the opposite of what happens to people and readers. Then, when the reader knows that the character in the story may not know yet, there is a dramatic sarcasm. - The death of Kate Chopin after the freedom of writing, the short story "One Hour Story" is a death news on the way to a Rui Marad where a woman from the 19th century received her husband Brent Marad in a terrible train accident. Mrs Mallard grieves quickly, but as she realizes independence and free will, her mood changes instantly. Her husband entered the door during her climax of the future The use of irony is an integral part of the episode of "Story and Time" by Kate Chopin. The irony of the situation was used to surprise the reader and added an interesting twist to the discovery of Mrs. Marad of Mrs. Death's death. Dramatic sarcasm is used to familiarize the reader with the situation of Mrs. Marado of his wife. The use of sarcasm helps make the story more interesting, and the end is surprising to the reader.

Dousika is the head of the Traore family. He has ten sons, two wives and several apes, the most important being Nya and his last love, Sira. Even though Dousika seems to be a strict leader, he can tell his family that it means more to him. Inevitably, Dousika did it only for his family. Like their educational tour, he took a son and left for a trip. From the way Dousika deals with his wife, the family is also very important. As mentioned earlier, women are generally in an unfavorable position in this culture, but Dousika is sympathetic to his wife. In Novel Segu, Maryse Conde beautifully constructed a personal and depth image of the history of Africa, using the four protagonists depicting the family's struggle and importance in today's Mari. These four characters with names of Tiecolo, Shiga, Nava, Maropari and their brothers face the world of their beloved town, Bambara, with the new custom of Islam and the development of European business and slave trade. - Early in the 20th century, except for one country, Africa as a whole went to the hands of Europeans. Despite all the factors of these countries Ethiopia defended the Italians in Adwa's battle in 1896. Unfortunately, when the Italians invaded the second time in 1935, the Ethiopians were not so successful. Why did Ethiopia defeat when they won 50 years ago? Seary of Maryse Conde uses a concrete illustration of Mary Se Conde's novel Segu. This discusses how the impact of Islam on Bamber society affects people's traditions, political, social and economic practices. Before Muslims arrived, Segu and his people, Bambaras, were very different from their world under the rule of Islam. - One of the biggest problems in the sexual reproduction of animals is conflicts of interest between women and species men. For example, multiple crosses have been shown to greatly improve the fertilization rate of men, but recent studies have shown that multiple crosses are also beneficial for women. The book "Segu" is a novel written by Maryse Conde. This novel was created in 1797 and tells the story of Africans of that era. Interestingly, Kant was able to create a novel that made her character life the most visible evidence of the lives of people living in Mari. Clearly, the issue of religion, norms and tradition is explained as an important aspect of society that affects the people of Old Mali. Thanks to Kant's wonderful story, I was fascinated by Mari's character and history

From the French Revolution (1789) to the present age, philosophers, scholars, social scientists, politicians, and economists have created a variety of important theories. Many ways of introducing various research environments such as Kant from Rousseau, John Stuart Mill from Adam Smith, Comte from Proudhon, Bernstein from Marx and Matszini from Ricardo are considered milestones. But during the 4th, 18th, 19th, 20th and 21st century social development is important and the basic assumptions of the early community have been replaced. Many thinkers are aware that our climate change crisis is rooted in the "growth or death" system of capitalism. However, it is important to remember that the modern world economy is not true capitalism. Indeed, nearly all the countries in the world have economies that are guided at least to some extent by the state, the public sector has promoted the bulk of innovation. . And grow. Therefore, most modern economies can be called state capitalism. An important element driving modern national capitalist economy is military, especially the United States. Indeed, the Department of Defense has become one of the main drivers of high-tech innovation in the past few decades. As explained by Economist Mariana Mazzucato in her book entrepreneurial nation: Elucidation of the myths of the public sector and the private sector "," almost all technical revolution from the Internet to today "Green Technology Revolution - all countries It is necessary to promote. " In the industrial era, keywords are systematic. Factory and assembly line will change production to system. I invented the discipline of political economy and analyzed the capitalist system. Economists used equations to explain the economy from the 19th century Leonard to the Congressional Budget Department today. Much of contemporary entertainment takes the form of a game. But I go beyond this and say that most of my life has become more like a game. Please check the page you are reading. There is a place for you to "praise" this article and give it points. Since placing graphics at the top of the article was said to be a strategy for attracting more readers, there is also an image at the top (from the place of the board game Othello). Paper writing has become a game! "Friendship" on Facebook, "Conversation" on Twitter

Friedrich Nietzsche (Nietzsche) "On a moral spectrum" includes his theory of human development "bad conscience". Nietzsche believed to be a community member, who sometimes roamed freely from one person, who naturally had to suppress him "the will to force", a "free instinct" (59). To create a unified predictable person (36), the governance department threatens its members in violation of its "ethical practices" to punish its laws and actions. Because of the fear of punishment to reduce his behavior, therefore people will no longer be allowed to enjoy their own instincts freely. The morality of the master-slave is the central theme of Friedrich Nietzsche's work, especially the first article of "moral lineage". Nietzsche believes that there are two basic types of morality: "dominant morality" and "slave morality". Mastering the pride and power of moral value, slavery morality appraises goodness, compassion, compassion. Unlike the morality of slavery, morality of ethics measures good or bad outcome behavior (ie classical virtue and vice, resultism) and the morality of a slave weighs the behavior of a good malicious image (Example: Christian's virtue and vice, Kant morality) Comparing "master moral" and "slave moral" of "moral breed" in Nietzsche, it is traced back power. It is a remarkable expression of the will to power, depending on their judgment, creating values ​​and giving it impose. The idea is to understand and evaluate the foundation of Nietzsche's moral system. A strong, healthy and proficient kind can confidently impose its value in the direct world with confidence. Strong, but as opposed to feeling guilty about your health, power, ego and pride, in contrast to this, a weak attempt is a more cunning, wicked way to impose your own values. "Our thoughts, values, all" yes "," no "," if "and" but ": Nietzsche summed up this idea in the preface of" moral spectrum "(hereinafter" Growth like us and there is the same result as the inevitable of the tree - all related, having affinity with everyone, but prove that person's body, health, 1 Earth , 1 day (GM P: 2). Nietzsche assumes that there is a possibility to understand the result through the same to understand some of the trees, take this concept or values ​​of type I tried to use the naturalism of the term to understand "person" what is necessary. Described by the fact that it brings fruits naturally like trees above, like the type of facts about those who explained his values ​​and behaviors

Inside of heathens: "darkness", "corruption", the discourse of colonialism in romanticism and colonialism, Tim Fulford and Peter Kitson said that most scholars detailed romantic sentences Relationship with British colonialist imperialism Fulford and Kitson pointed out that "the romantic era is a colonial history basin" and based on the "white burden" political philosophy of the UK It shows the birth of the empire (3). By reading romantic texts in the historical and political context of colonialism and imperialism, Fulford and Kitson agree with the background of the material, colonial process, which is consistent with the colonial form they imagined I hope to attribute "romantic text" to the material to be. . Michael Altman's infidels, Hindu, and Hindus criticize the American Hindu history, the nationalism of the formation from the colonial era to the Chicago World Parliament, and the criticism of the Orientalist editorials to the revised standard "transcendental It criticized with the principle. Theologian - Vivekananda - 1965 "Track (xvii). Altman used a genealogical method to display his historical data, and how the" derogatory concept "of Indian religion is As a discourse foil, and for white people, it showed whether it was used as a new American scarecrow. Altman believes that when these Americans talk about religion in India they are truly "talking about themselves" (xxi) and constitute their own ethnic, ethnic and religious identity ( 140) Altman, Michael. Pagan, Hindu, Hindus: Indian representative office in India, 1721-1893. New York: Oxford University Press, 2017.xxii + 175. $ 34.95 (Hardcover) Altman first opened three religious goods to load the term - pagan, Gentoo, Hindoo First, Cotton Mather rejected all forms of "pagan" religion in 1721 (1); By 1784, Hannah Adams's "liberalism" account tried to describe "justice" more than in her so-called "Gentoos" "forgiving" faith (16); in 1811, Claudio Buchanan's "evangelicals Representative of the group stated that the religion of "Hinduism" is violence and superstition (30-1). There are several such "evangelical" records, Altman says that missionary organizations "use promotion for evangelism and take advantage of Indian's achievement to increase their institutional power" It is proving (38) Altman, Michael. Pagan, Hindu, Hindus: Indian representative office in India, 1721-1893. New York: Oxford University Press, 2017.xxii + 175. $ 34.95 (Hardcover) The colonial discouragement praised the Burmese Buddhist's generosity and partly condemned the "superstition" and "retreat" of Hindus and Muslims like caste in the colony of Burma. This discourse has been accepted by the Burmese nationalists and unfortunately is used to justify the violence of Rohingya Muslim. Even though we believe that most Buddhists and members of any other religious group have pacifism and forgiving beliefs there is no reason to expect them to be pacifist and tolerant. As Immanuel Kant understands, we are not transparent to ourselves and we can not fully understand why we are doing this. To be sure whether we took reasons to believe that we did (such as "This is right"), or whether we are psychological, neurophysiological, or completely opaque You can not. Economic reason

In Kant XXVI, among many other crimes, Ulysses Alighieri of Dante's "hell" is punished for "fraud consultant". These people are often swallowed by flames, and more importantly, as Dante points out, they are forced to speak through "tongues" or flames, which makes them disastrous. This follows the concept of punishment as much as Dante's sin - they should be difficult to say now, as they are easy to say wrong. The best person in the world is a legend - Ulysses. Dante Alighieri must be a very strict and hobby-loving parent. In the first part of his collection, The Inferno, Alighieri filled his story with subliminal information in the text and taught the reader more lessons. Dante Alighieri explains the concrete moment to express human weaknesses and how we can positively influence human rationality to respond in the correct way in God's eyes I will deliberately choose. Through the interaction of his two main characters Dante, he will represent Dante Alighieri's hell analysis Dante Alighieri 's Divine Comet is considered the first great poetry in Italy, probably the greatest poetry in medieval Europe. This poem is very famous, one of the small figures, the great leader Kappanez has his name on Jupiter's moon Io's place (blue, 1). In addition, the poem is divided into three brochures, "Inferno", "Purgatorio", and Dantes Inferno In The Innono, and the punishment of many sinners of Dante is suspected of the crime they committed. Like Dante, they feel very pathetic for many sinners in hell at all levels. Many of their revenge seems to be too strict for seemingly bad crimes. Francesca and Paul Di Rimini could not control the love that developed between them, but they were forced to spend eternity on the second lap of hell. In Dante Alighieri The Inno, perceived by The Inferno, the poet Dante Alighieri emphasizes perception; through sight, the pilgrim Dante can recognize and learn his experience in hell. Since pilgrim Dante is often attracted to a specific image, vision plays an important role in work. The sight of the sinner carries Dante, as a result the sinner is attracted to Dante and Virgil. It seems that Dante is observing everything

Enlightenment was an era of the 18th century when philosophy and cultural life changed. The exercise began in France and spread to the UK, Italy, Spain, Portugal and Germany at the same time These ideas began with the most famous thinkers and philosophers of the time and eventually shared with the public. Enlightenment is a way of focusing on human improvement by logic and reason rather than absurdity and superstition. This way of thinking shows skepticism in front of religion, challenging inequality between the king and the people, and trying to establish a sound moral system. The idea behind ... shows more content According to Stockstad, these ideas were born from the scientific revolution of the last century, philosophers such as Francis Bacon and Descartes established a scientific method based on the logical reasoning we now know . Experiment to prove these ideas. Astronomer Galileo Galilei confirmed the previous theory of Nicolaus Copernicus that the sun is another way instead of going around the Earth - the planet revolves around the sun. These theories and practices are contrary to the teaching of the Church, especially when Galileo was forced to regain what he said in his view. Other scientists have found on smaller scales related to the animal kingdom and plant life, and artists are used to conveying new discoveries by drawing or drawing these findings. (P. 756) Due to the various revolutions and events that occurred before the 18th century, it can be said that enlightenment is only a logical advance and the next step. Like the previous scientific revolution, the new enlightenment philosophy was disseminated through both art and text, like the encyclopedia of Dennis Diderot sold to the middle class of France printed. The encyclopedia has the latest view on the advantages of art, science and human freedom. Due to this progress Age of Enlightenment is an age of scientific awakening, and Age of Enlightenment mainly developed in France. The starting point of enlightenment is John Rock's book on human understanding. Enlightenment attacked the leaders of the church and focused on problems that were avoided in the past. Trying to challenge the church takes courage. As the Church said, enlightenment let people ask questions such as "Earth is the center of the universe." - These journals impair these authoritative sources - through knowledge and reasons - suggesting a source of new knowledge. The history of the French Academy of Sciences during enlightenment began with the Academy of Sciences in Paris in 1666. As several clerics (13%) show, the academic community shows an increasing interest in science and its secularization. The era of enlightenment, sometimes called the age of reason, refers to the time that leads the movement of thought called enlightenment. During enlightenment, people insisted on it as a means of establishing authoritative aesthetics, ethics, government and even religion. Some people think that the reasons allow people to get objective truth about reality - <http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Age_of_Enlightenment> (May 5, 2010 Day Access). 60 Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau among them can be said to have made the most important contribution to the development of liberalism by announcing some pioneering work on liberalism. These works are J Rousseau Social Contract, two articles on citizen's government by T Hobbes Leviathan, J Locke. Later philosophers such as Kant and Rawls further developed these ideas. The focus is different from philosophers and philosophers, but the central idea of ​​social contract remains unchanged.

Anselm Anselm was born in 1033 by aristocratic parents in Aosta, Italy. He and his mother always have a strong relationship, but his relationship with his father is very different. They will never succeed. Anselm wanted to be a priest since he was a young boy. As a child, he imagined that heaven would stay on the Jupiter Hill outside his home, which might help plow this dream. Anselm did not want to become a monk any longer after a short period later, but when he was fifteen he did not become a priest. St. Anselm was born in Ostapiemonte in 1033. Anselm knew that he wanted to be a monk when he was very young. After Anselm's father forbade to follow his dream of becoming a monk, Anselm left the house in his early twenties. Anselm emigrated to France, where he became a monk in 1060. A few years later, Anselm became a precedent for Abbott. At 1093, A. A. Anselm was enshrined as an archbishop. The next few years was a tension and confusion between Anselm and the King about money and other issues ... St. Ansel brought problems to Rome where he was less helped than he thought. In the meantime, King William died and St. Anselm returned to England. The new king made great emphasis on St. Anthony and never denied his view or opinion on important issues. Nevertheless there are still problems like money that need to be solved by Rome. Even if there is a difference in a problem, St. Anthony and the King still have a good relationship. An ontological argument was originally developed by Anselm of Canterbury, a clergy and philosopher of the 12th century. Philosophers and scholars have found several different clues to Anselm's work. The simplified version of Anselm's proof was very popular in modern times (17th - 18th century), which was used with a few examples by Descartes, Spinoza, and Leibniz. A simplified discussion is this: Kant provides two major arguments for this proof. His first critique was traditional criticism. And it was used by Aquinas and many other medieval philosophers. Kant's argument depends on the following assertions: whether it is always two separate problems, one thing. We can say what you like about the essence and essence of things. It is always a matter of asking whether there is something with this essence or essence.

Knowledge theory In today's society, science is considered to be the form of most trusted knowledge, and many people claim that it is the best form of knowledge. In order to investigate whether this is reasonable, we must compare science with other forms / knowledge areas and consider their respective contributions. The most powerful argument that science must claim to be this title is its method, in particular the objectivity and experience of the verification process, which is mainly based on induction inference and deduction reasoning. Modern knowledge theory was introduced with his "critic system" by famous philosopher Emmanuel Kant. Some authors believe that knowledge is part of the philosophy of the term epistemology, but now it has evolved into independent science. Education of knowledge, organization of libraries, and many other very practical implementations. For me, knowledge theory is the most useful subject at school as it provides me the basis for solving any problems, questions and challenges in my daily life. The way we study and think about knowledge is a tool in our hands. According to the knowledge theory guide issued on behalf of the International Baccalaureate Organization (IBO), the purpose of the Knowledge Theory Course is to encourage students to "consider the nature of knowledge and ponder all learning processes". They study subjects and connect with them as part of the diploma program. "Knowledge theory courses, creativity, behavior, services (CAS), and extended papers form the three core elements of the IB curriculum and require IB diplomas:" Educate everyone " At the center of the IB Diploma is the Knowledge Theory (ToK) course. It is a central element of IB research and summarizes the main knowledge students learn in various subjects. The ToK course "encourages critically thinking about knowledge itself and attempts to help young people understand the problems they encounter" (ToK Discipline Guide). For each subject, it is important to know what kind of knowledge and how to master it. In this sense, ToK is an adhesive that connects various scholarly elements of the IB Diploma. Finally, the IB ToK course is evaluated in two parts. - 1200-1600 articles written in titles chosen from six lists provided by IB

As an ABC official, Tommy needs to disclose this important fact to the DEF. However, as Johnny was the owner of Tommy, Tommy did not disclose this important fact to the DEF, so he was afraid of Johnny being dismissed. Therefore, we decided to use Kantian vs. Utilitarian to determine if tommy needs to disclose this information to the DEF. First of all, the idea behind Kant's way is that everyone has intrinsic value because humans have their own values. Still, the Kant method relies on absolute commands. He was employed as an ABC company as an administrator of ABC's accounting management company as a manager of the company. ABC is a manufacturing company specializing in manufacturing cedar roof and siding. The company's current annual turnover is approximately $ 1.2 million, an increase of 25% over the previous year. We conducted a positive market survey on sample population composition. In addition to the number of families, demographic variables are nominal / category, and frequency is necessary. Families are metric and need to conduct an average analysis. Birthplace or city size Frequency ratio Effective rate cumulative percentage Below 10,000 Custom semester Papers and Papers | Research Paper Writing | Paper Writing | University Paper Help The signatory is the director of ABC Corporation, which means that we will agree to the special meeting of the ABC Executive Committee to be held at 123 Main Street Community Center on Tuesday, 5th July at 7 pm. Adjust the meeting. In addition, I agree and agree that all legitimate work will be held at a meeting or postponement, as long as we believe that other directors make sense. The work done during the conference or postponement shall have the same effect and effect as in the case of conference or postponement after notification, having effect and legal effect. In addition to internal promotional materials, Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) does not provide any advertisements, and is prohibited under the ABC Act of 1983. In the federal budget for 2014/15, ABC received A $ 1.11 billion. These funds are used for ABC's television, radio, online and international output. ABC has also received funds from many ABC stores in Australia. It is funded by the Australian government, but ABC 's editorial independence is guaranteed by law.

About truth, beauty, and goodness Frauss scholars spent a lot of energy on his ideas about truth, logic, and relations between them. However, little attention has been gathered about a series of clues. Frege has repeatedly tried to clarify the relationship between logic and truth by comparing the relationship between morality and goodness with the relationship between beauty and beauty throughout his career. Of course, truth, beauty and kindness have a long history of Plato's philosophy. As a mathematician, Frege 's interest in logic arises from his interest in the foundation of arithmetic. In the early days of his career, Frege found that the truth of arithmetic was logical, analyzing the truth, agreeing to Leibniz, and contesting Kant. And more empirical thinkers like JS Mill believe that arithmetic is based on observation. In other words, Frege agrees with logicalism. His logicalism is modest in a sense, but in other respects it is very ambitious. The logic of Frege is limited to arithmetic; unlike other important historical logic scholars like Russell, Frege does not consider geometry to be a branch of logic. But Frege's logicism is, on the contrary, very ambitious. Because he believes that people can subtract all the truths of arithmetic from a limited number of logical axioms. The basis of mathematical truth has always been the subject of long-term debate. Frege tried to prove clearly that the arithmetic truth can be derived from a purely logical axiom, and ultimately from a logical truth (Gottlob Frege of 1884, The Foundations of Arithmetic, 1879 ). This project was developed in their Principia Mathematica by Russell and Whitehead. If parameters can be projected as symbol logic statements, they can be tested by applying approved certificates. This was done using the Panano axiom for the calculation. Nonetheless, like other areas, discussions in mathematics can only be considered valid if they can prove that they can not have real assumptions and wrong conclusions. What is the difference between Peirce and Frege? Frege is trying to discover the truth through science. Peirce is trying to build the truth through science. What is the difference? For example, although Fregian psychoanalysts seem to be unable to understand how teachers use this truth to correct problems of achievement, they try to find the truth of student achievement through high-risk testing I will. At the same time, Peiccian psychologists are looking for ways to build and rebuild the needs of social achievement, to teach these needs, and to objectively measure and improve those needs. Both are seeking a real objective world, but only one person is trying to understand the foundation of objectivity.

"We need to consider that some rights are transferred to others, regardless of whether a person assigns rights or forfeit their rights, and wishes to do so for other benefits This is a voluntary act, "It is good for him. "(192) raising whether Thomas Hobbes's declaration is a matter of" oughts ", a prudent, moral or moral basis is that the former wins through his writing. Thomas Hobbes vs. Emmanuel Kant Part 1: Thomas Hobbes "Everyone has their own reasons and what can be misused can help him protect his life from his enemies ( Hob) Si, 120) Thomas Hobbes, considered a reasonable egoist, mentioned this in his book "Leviathan". Hobbes believes that people's behavior depends only on the ultimate influence on that person. Our ultimate ethical responsibility comes from our own interests. After analyzing Hobbes 'theory, we can explain and criticize Hobbes' debate about how people should carry out their contracts. First, Thomas Hobbs considers the contract to be "mutual transfer of rights" (Hobbes, p. 192). In Hobbes' opinion, the contract (he may also be referred to as a contract or contract) must be mutual, otherwise it is the same as a gift or grace. Hobbes later explained the difference between inference and expression of social contracts. In his opinion, the expression contract is "when I understand what they mean", such as "I give, I give etc." (Hobbes, p. 193). In other words, expressing a social contract is a contract that promises to be formed using words and phrases. However, inferred social contracts can be accomplished in many different ways. Looking at Hobbes' social contract, I think it is more convenient to infer the type of social contract than expressing a social contract. Both Thomas Hobbs and John Locke are British philosophers. Thomas Hobbs discussed and developed social contract theory through his book Leviathan. The social contract theory was later supported and explained by John Locke. This theory important to the two philosophers explains the relationship between the state and the individual. It insists that individuals agree to abandon some of their freedom to establish the power to protect their remaining collective liberties. Both Thomas Hobbs and John Locke support liberalism. They all support personal freedom and equality

In the mid 1940's, "from the French ethics" (14c), and "from the Latin ethics" "good or bad" (good or bad), "someone's appropriate behavior in society" literally "etiquette It is related to ". Translation cause from Latin Moss (gender Morris) to "Personality", plural form, "custom, custom, moral" of "Greek" (ethics reference) from Cicero ("De Fato", "II.i) It is unknown. Maybe share English emotion and PIE's roots (1) It means "moral good according to moral rules", initially recorded at the end of 14c. Stories, people of the 1630s. Neutral consciousness to original value is held in moral support, moral victory ("sense compared to personality versus physical behavior"). Related: Morality It is worth noting that moral relativism, moral skepticism and moral expertise are logically independent of each other. For example, moral relativists are also moral genericists but not moral skeptics (such as cultural relativists like the ale sociologist William Graham Sumner of the early 20th century); moral skeptics are He is not a moral expert. (For Nietzsche, McKee and Richard Joyce they are providing "erroneous theories" to build so-called absolute universal objective moral principles); some of the special supporters Moral questionable commentator (eg his view of contemporary new Aristotle like Ross, "practical responsibility" or "proper job", Jonathan Dancy), not ethical, moral realism, Reasonable human condition 4, Kant ethics and human existence: moral philosophy research - Section 1.2, EKE and moral relativism, moral skepticism and moral specialism Moral skepticism (or moral skepticism) is a sort of meta-alien theory that all members believe that no member has moral knowledge. Many moral skeptics also propose claims of stronger aspects than moral knowledge is impossible. Moral skepticism is contrary to the existence of moral realism, especially the identifiable and objective moral truth. Michael Ruth, Joshua Green, Richard Garner, Richard Garner, Walter Sinotto Armstrong (1977), Max Stillner, Friedrich Nietzsche, Richard Joyce (2001), Pierlin, Inceidemos, Dexter Dempse, David Hume, JL Mackie (Some moral skeptical views of including defense, 2006b) and psychologist James Flynn. Strictly speaking, Gilbert Harman (1975) believes in supporting moral relativism rather than moral skepticism. However, he influenced several modern moral skeptics

What is law, what is the government? In our country, the government is democracy or the government of the people. For countries like us and many other countries around the world to define their laws, they must first look at their common ethics. These ethics will be the foundation of all the laws that will be introduced and society can not be established without a common moral foundation. In the past, let's examine the oldest law to explore the impact of ethics on the past government. The code of Hammurabi, written in 1772 BC, is the oldest known law. In his first moral philosophy, "foundation of moral metaphysics", Kant can provide us a way to determine the moral controversy to provide us with a common moral instinct to us I tried to systematize it. Do not ask various questions or clarify. According to common understanding, he pointed out that the only unconditional good thing in the world is goodwill. Well-known good fortune, health, and even happiness are not unconditionally good. When they marry the bad guys they will be the source of condemnation for fair observers. We will not admire the evil man who achieved his goals and enjoyed the sunset victory. We condemn him and I hope his plan will be dissatisfied. No, it is more important than happiness, with happiness, that is worth having goodwill. Common good traditional philosophers believe that the answer is positive. Our society lacks moral importance. Missing is a real concern for common interests. Everyone in our society really does not care about the rule of law or shared facilities like common interests of these facilities. Citizens simply play various public roles to gain private profit. According to the general good concept of political ethics, even if personal incentives lead to fill all relevant positions, lack of attention to common interests is itself a moral defect of political society is there.

Law and emotion and Lacan We should rule our emotions. We should make decisions based on how we feel at a particular time. Perhaps emotions should not affect our decision at all. Some of the letters we have examined show two aspects of this problem. Luther and Alice of the show fell on both sides of the spectrum and Billybad adopted a hybrid approach. German philosopher Immanuel Kant was thought to be the protagonist of modern philosophy and he proposed the concept of "pathological object". When this idea violates "absolute order", you can make a person make a decision. Even if you encounter specific things, you will not feel specific emotions automatically. We will explain the situation (thought), react to what we think about it (emotions), and act according to our emotions (behavior). Thoughts follow emotions, emotions follow actions. The first is thought, emotion, and action. Furthermore, emotional intelligence is a factor that affects communication with others. The higher the EQ you develop, the easier it is for you to understand the emotions and emotions of others (empathy). In other words, empathy can help you build better relationships (social skills) with people. People who have a high EQ are good at managing people, influencing, resolving conflicts, working as a team member. The first element of our character is related to our emotional development. We can control our emotions and control us. Many think that such control is impossible, but because of the flexibility, attitude, countermeasure mechanisms of emotion, skills related to identity, control of emotion is very good. The second element is related to our body. In order to maintain personal management, we have to apply a lot of energy - which requires good physical condition. Through appropriate nutrition, rest, exercise, we may develop the endurance necessary to make it possible to develop a higher level of personal development. We can not manage the external environment of the world. We can not control our bodies. We can not control our own ideas. You can not control emotions. Everything that happens to us, and all we do is the result of the environment that arises in response to our unconscious thinking reactions and our unconscious thinking. We can only control where we pay attention. This is because our only concern is our attention which is our essence. By directing our attention to the core of delusion, we can use it to unlock mysteries that bind us and release it from this suffering ourselves.

We examined how teenagers (the sixth grade, N = 357) to evaluate virtual bullying and defend the hero, and these evaluations are conducted morally with their companions about nomination Whether it is bullying or not. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) leads to four factors to evaluate hypothetical bullying: five factors besides demons, contempt, timid and corruption, to evaluate the assumed DF: universal adore, courage Cool, sympathy, care, and justice. A corresponding scale is constructed. The results show that bullying and cowardly use show that the bullying of assumption of positive correlation, assumption of victims and ordinary admiration, empathy, care and justice evaluation evaluate positive correlation on the defensive side. Assuming that the moral assessment of the performance scale (bullying, victims, defenders and participants) bullying of the MANOVA group 2 evaluation scale at the show, the moral evaluation of the fictional defender is not important Influence important Good (and evil) refers to the evaluation of moral objective to evaluate human behavior in a binary context, one of which is morally positive and the other is moral denial. The good thing is it - the times are seen as respect for life, continuity, happiness or human prosperity, evil is blessed to support their opponents. For alienation Kant, alienation is the opposite of autonomy. A self-determined person is a self-determination person and the will of a heterosexual person is determined by something other than a person like an excited feeling. In etymology, alienation can go back to Greek "other" and "law". € We examined how teenagers (the sixth grade, N = 357) to evaluate virtual bullying and defend the hero, and these evaluations are conducted morally with their companions about nomination Whether it is bullying or not. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) Lead to Four Factors to Evaluate Hypothesized Bullying: Evaluate the DF of "evil spirit", "contempt", "timid" and "degeneracy" and the assumptions of 5 factors: " Universal dream, "courage" "cool" "sympathy care" and "justice". The result is the use of "bullshit" bullying assessment with bullying Assuming positive correlation assumptions and victims and "universal praise", "virtual defender's evaluation from the perspective of mobile emotional care and fairness and justice is positive There is a correlation.

Henry David Thoreau and Surrealist Henry David Thoreau had many anarchist ideas for the US government in the decades before the Civil War. In fact, it was originally called the "citizen resistance" government, but it gave a strong message to the article. Do not just reflect Thoreau's own views on the Mexican war, but also think and shape civil rights leaders. Although the philosophical concept was developed by Plato, Henry David Thoreau and transcendental transit began as a movement of extreme religious movement against the conservative system. Historically, according to Peter Carafiol's transcendence, "It was intellectual property born from Kant and mediated by Romanticism between England and Germany." Prior to that, it was a monotheistic relationship. As Kalafior said, protests and dissatisfaction with Protestantism and Catholicism. The impact of transcendentalism: Henry David Thoreau transcendence was American literature in the early 19th century, political and philosophical movements were attributed to ancient UK and Germany romanticism (Goodman). Ralph Waldo Emerson is considered to be the father of transcendence because his literature is the first important spiritual literature praising nature. The basic belief in sports is to live faithfully to life, to be true to yourself (Japan). Exercise itself Ralph Waldo Emerson as a pioneer of transcendence and Henry David Thoreau transcendence was a writing movement that took place in the mid - 19th century. It generally reached the peak of the American Renaissance, the American Golden Day, or the era called New England, formed in the middle of the early 19th century. The basic principles of transcendence include relationships between themselves and the whole world. First of all, in the "independence" of Ralph Waldo Emerson, Emerson called all of the community to be completely faithful to themselves. He insists that the most important thing for individuals and society is not to believe others' beliefs, but to make people believe in their ideas. Emerson believes that integrity will eventually lead to personal death, as people live for others and they are not loyal to themselves. So, in order to build a good society, citizens must concentrate.

Postmodern is a very difficult concept to define. A French philosopher defined Postmodernism as "a suspect of all metanarathies", but this basically means skepticism about all claims of absolute truth. The elements and techniques used by postmodern authors raise doubts about their reading experiences and motivate readers to examine their own understanding of life and social value. Postmodern writers use good examples of postmodern compositions such as satire, magical realism, fragmentation of short stories read by women. It refers to famous fuzzy terms, especially literature, postmoderns can be seen as a response to very modern elitism and the fear of the world war. Contemporary literature is characterized by highly separated fragmented culture. The low technology reflects the lack of tradition and structure in the world driven by technology and consumerism. Postwar literature (post modern): Actually, this is the most difficult time to define this time. Especially there is no clear border between modernism and postmodern. But the postwar era of all types such as Samuel Beckett and the absurd drama related to Harold Pinter and the new model in poetry and novel has experimental techniques. Some of British literature's best writers are Philipp Larkin, Ted Hughes, Salman Rushdie, John Fowles, Kazuo Kazuo, Tom Stoppard. The first species of modernism literature was embedded in the emergence of the modern era. Modernity is a historical period of post-traditional or post medieval, characterized by completely transformed from tradition. This is a time to commemorate the emergence of a reasonable age from enlightenment (about 1687 to 1789). Scientists such as Emmanuel Kant, Rene Descartes, and most importantly Isaac Newton, can save the world through science and through their reasons that they can lay the foundation of universal truth believe. Political leaders like Niccolò Machiavelli also revealed modernity. It believes that they can establish peace through rationality and creates large movements such as capitalism, industrialism and urbanization. Talking about postmodern means that modernism is over. It's not. There was no neat borderline. The avant - garde movement in the original literature and art was modernistic, influence of avant - garde continued. You can say that there are new avant - garde. In addition, postmodern is still happening. When something else evolves or replaces it, it may be easier to identify, explain and classify it. Regarding lighting, it is possible to evaluate specific functions of postmodern. For example, there is ignition that is contrary to authority and meaning, and often it is not a type. Here you can quote experimental techniques In the novels shown in the new Rome and anti - novel (q.q.u), these seem dangerously close to just a hoe.

Nietzsche, Marx, Kiakegaard and Zarastura are always the most popular, and the voice of God disappears throughout the mountains. Please reevaluate our idols and discover the relationship between the importance of their abolition and the complex network that we create for our lives. Zarathustra, his sacred character, opened up a new era, the last person was eradicated and the dirty pests were camouflaged as a promise of cheese. The world was filled with mouse traps and it was a crazy place full of faces they could not understand. This demolition of rationalist philosophers like Descartes is strongly influenced by Nietzsche, Marx, Kierkegaard, Foucault. After philosophical synthesis of these philosophers, the review of Descartes is surprising, and this work is considered glorious fame. Rene Descartes is thought to be the founder of analytical geometry, an important contributor to scientific methods, and finally a philosopher. But the philosophical review of the logicologist showed that his analysis lacked some legitimate content and tried to reach the truth but only attempted to realize the belief. This understanding and conclusion reveals the ambiguity of Descartes' philosophy and pleads to condemn him as a philosopher of glory (although he did not mention mathematicians). The term "existentialism" derives from the tradition of "existentialism" such as philosophers Blaise Pascal, Immanuel Kant, SørenKierkegaard, early in Karl Marx, Friedrich Nietzsche, Martin-Heidegger, Jean-Paul Sartre, Simone de Beauvoir It has a specific philosophical meaning. Maurice Merlot-Ponty and Albert Camus and writer Fyodor Dostoevsky and Franz Kafka SørenKierkegaard, Friedrich Nietzsche, Fyodor Dostoevsky are considered existentialists, but in fact were created by Jean-Paul Sartre. It is widely believed that Kierkegaard may be the first surviving philosopher, but he used the term "individualism" to refer to his philosophical thought. When reading a sentence, it is easy to understand why it is closely related to existentialism. Kierkegaard wrote to his book "Deadly Sick" as follows. Other losses can not occur so quietly; other losses - arms, legs, $ 5, wives etc - will definitely be noticed. "

Position of human falls One of the core problems in the process human beings are trying to understand is our nature. Understanding our true nature can provide insight into many problems that have not yet been solved in our world. Whether we are deep inside our heart, whether we are good or bad affects what we are doing and what we can do. Two prominent figures in Christian history oppose this topic. Augustine believes that humans have been corrupted fundamentally since the collapse of humanity in Genesis, and Pelagius believes that humans have full freedom to choose good and evil. Jainism is a godly religion centered on asceticism and stupidity and nonviolence. Jansenism is a division of Catholic thought, emphasizing the original sin, the fall of mankind, the necessity and destiny of God's grace. It was named after Cornelius Otto Janssen. Judaism is a monotheistic religion of Abraham derived from ancient Hebrew. Kantoism is the philosophy of German philosopher Immanuel Kant, born in Königsberg, Germany (now Kaliningrad in Russia). The term cantianism or cantism can refer to a contemporary position in spiritual philosophy, epistemology, and ethics. Cartesianism is an extension of "myths" from Casshena Theon, "a god at a time". Kierkegaardianism is a set of philosophical, theological and psychological positions based on the works of Denmark's philosopher Soren Kilkegau in the 19th century. Kierkegaard's work focuses on struggle to become a true individual with existing individuals If you go to the timeline now, you will be able to follow this brief summary of the idea's history. The story begins with the concept of Puritan human degradation and ends with the idea of ​​contemporary human possibilities, from the American Enlightenment theory (1680-1820) to transcendence (1820-1870) and pragmatism (1870-19100). Along the way you will learn and learn about people, text, communication, maps, buildings, and events from different eras.

I think that Hume's morals can be described as virtue ethics I am referring to the idea that which role will take precedence over action and action principles: practical with gentle role guidance and constraints Discussion. In traditional utilitarianism and Kant Ethics, personality is subject to actual deliberation. Only virtue is necessary to motivate benign behavior. I first outlined this approach with Aristotle's ethics and compared it with Hume. I think that the good character of Aristotle is understood as "self love". True self enthusiasts are most interested in using characteristics of judgment, selection, judgment, and removal. Hume studied moral judgment and started looking for meaning of moral terms. Hume does not find observable facts and logical relationships that answer the concepts of good, justice, moral virtue, but the function of moral terms is not to express quality or relationship but "recognized emotions" . I do not have any emotions in my judgment. The reason we call it good is the same as what we call beauty. If that object is comfortable immediately, or if it is a useful means to obtain other pleasant items, that object is good. Virtue is a "natural virtue" such as talent, wisdom, kindness, whether it is "human virtue" such as honesty or justice, makes a person happy or useful to himself or to others It is quality to be. In his work "Humanity theory", David Hume divides virtues into two categories, artificial virtue and natural virtue. Hume pointed out that courage is a natural virtue in paper. Among the paper's "pride and humility, its purpose and cause", Hume clearly shows that courage is the cause of pride. Witness, goodwill, learning, courage, justice, honesty, all these are the reasons for pride, and the opposite of their humility. In his argument about natural virtues, Hume 's debt to Greek ethics can be seen more clearly. Among them, the important group (consisting of courage, generosity, ambition, etc.) is based on self esteem and may even be a kind of self-esteem: "We call it a heroic virtue, it's great Praise the soul under sublime character.Stability and perfection of pride and self-esteem, or main engagement to that passion ... courage ... and all other shining virtues clearly among them It is a strong self-esteem and it is derived from their origin. A big advantage "(Hume, essay, 599-600). However, these virtues based on self-esteem must be influenced by the second group including generosity, compassion, loyalty, friendship, and otherwise the courageous qualities are "tyrant and public robber It is suitable only for making "(Hume, Treatise, 603)

Is the US method better than Canters? According to Weber (2009, p. 42), the US method to explain criminals is based on an interview method to understand convicted successive killers how to explain their criminal behavior. Then, they use this information to look at the crime scene and see what type of crime was mentioned earlier. This criminal description style is related to the FBI's Behavior Science Unit (Webber 2009, p. 42). Sherlock Holmes and Holmes (citation from Webber 2009 in 2002, p. 42), the serial killer is a white man from 25 to 34 years old, smart and gorgeous and charismatic with a smart, "street smart", for the police I am interested to argue that I am working. The investigative psychological approach to crime analysis was developed by David Canter and incorporates psychological concepts into the development of criminal profiles using inductive investigation techniques (Ainsworth, 1999). Survey psychology distinguishes criminals and offenders in an effective and reliable way, using empirical research, statistical analysis techniques and logical reasoning rather than a subjective process to establish the field of scientific psychology I hope to (Canter, 2004) Prior to 1986, David Kant, professor of Applied Psychology at Surrey University in the UK, is the first criminal profile created by railway murderer John Duffy. As a result, the Chief Police Association (ACPO) decided to set up a special committee to discuss the results of the Tami case. In that case, Professor Canter formed the psychological characteristics of the murderer at 13 of the 17 points he created. This was welcomed as a breakthrough in the psychological understanding of criminal acts, and for the special committee, research projects led by Kanter were established to develop an appropriate criminal analysis framework. (Murder Casebook, 1991, p 2681) Professor David Canter pointed out that there are some promising results in several areas of research in a paper on criminal profiling and criminal discrimination (2000). Thus, the described method is used in the process of building a system capable of supporting the decision process. The Radex model (2000) developed by Canter attempts to classify criminal acts by identifying the main theme of action, rather than simplifying the criminal to a specific type. Figure 1 shows a general model of radex applied to criminal acts. This focuses on behaviors that are considered typical for all offenders and shifts to more specific actions. Figure 2 is an attempt to distinguish the different nature of behavioral science in criminal behavior.

Throwing it into a locker, Michael slid into linoleum intensely. In his body, not in his body. Foot, boots and shoes were blurred in his abdomen and groin, so a bright flash jumped into my head. His towel ripped around the body and he got naked there. Tears of silence were drawn in the fragile and shameful face. Closing his eyes, he noticed that no one can save him from his torture. Everyone in the changing room is involved. "Love is not love of hate, God's love is the opposite, otherwise Satan will become a kind of coordination, but this is an incomplete stage, love to see hatred as Anteros - yes, even dislikes Self-love is not love, so if God's self is love, what he loves must be a defect of love; just as a celebrity can inherently illuminate dark things http: / / / buff .ly / 1 NXaavf 39. Fifth: There was considerable controversy over whether the scientific results of psychology should be included in the premise of deriving logical principles.Other people are new Whether it's a new one, JS Mill (Hamilton Exam, 5th Edition, p. 461) declares "the theoretical grounds are completely derived from psychology". Kant believes that psychology does not affect logic Answer to dispute 2. Love and hatred are essentially different. The purpose of love is good, because it flows from God to creation. Love belongs to God first and then belongs to our neighbors. On the other hand, hatred is evil and God Himself has no place but only in his influence, as mentioned earlier (Article 1), God is considered to be with him is. Because the impact is related, hatred is directed to our neighbors before being directed to God. So, because our neighbor's jealousy is the mother of our neighbors' hatred, it causes hatred of God.

Punishment exists from the early days of colonial era and it is a way to prevent criminals from committing crime throughout history. Philosophers believe that punishment is a global response to crime and violence and is therefore indispensable in today's modern society. Friedrich Nietzsche's book, Punishment and Rehabilitation, reaffirms that "punishment becomes our own; it creates the responsibility and the ability to undertake and release our social obligations" (Blue , Naden). , 2001). Emanuel Kant believes that criminals should be punished if a person commits a crime. Cesare Beccaria will display its content further if there is a violation. In this way philosophers, governments and prison officials have reached five traditional punishment goals to reproduce the elements of criminal penalties. They are revenge, recovery, deterrence, recovery, and disability. However, retaliation, rehabilitation and deterrence are the three most commonly used reasons in modern society today. Because these are the main reasons for punishment. The theory of punishment and punishment is related to philosopher Emmanuel Kant, who was called the "model of justice" in the 18th century. The concept of retaliatory punishment is "mere desert", used as a means of peace with perpetrators, by giving the perpetrator the same degree of suffering according to the crime, the victim feels the reason and that Will satisfy the victim. Revenge is not a law of revenge, but the Bible's mosaic law changes its ideal to "eye for eye" phenomenon. The goal is that the strength of punishment is consistent with the seriousness of the crime. This punishment is usually enforced by a judge whether or not it is a fine, probation or imprisonment. An example of this is when you find a person stealing a bar. In contrast, the rules of modern laws are completely different, and punishment is less important. Instead, society is concerned about regaining the initial situation, not badly retaliated against criminals. "But today it is said that punishment has changed its nature, rather than retaliation for social punishment, retaliation for self-defense" (Division, p. 86). These quotes show how collective consciousness can play a role in societies without highly developed division of labor. Therefore, the main role of punishment is to protect and reaffirm conscientious groups in the face of actions that doubt its sacredness. To achieve this goal, these societies form forms of oppression or criminal law. Modern society recognizes that prisoners should be handled humanely according to human rights obligations. Some offenders have committed terrible crimes but misrepresented that violence can solve the problem, there is no practical purpose for death penalty, torture, or prisoner abuse. Eye society's eyes are old and not suitable for modern civilization society. Fourth, they should make statements about capital punishment with the same energy for all the countries that have capital punishment. Prejudice against the country, not the statement to China and the United States. International relations are complex, but the moral movement against one country rather than another is morally unreasonable. In the world of justice there may not be a controversial field like the death penalty. In modern times, this problem has been repeatedly raised. Should we continue to use the death penalty as a punishment for a specific crime? The death penalty will never be underestimated, but our society moves towards time and place, which is a form of punishment no longer allowed. For these reasons, the death penalty should be abolished. As one of the most advanced countries in the world, the United States follows the trend set by many other developed countries in the world, and this problem is solved with simple civilized punishment focused on the eyes of the eyes You should solve it.

Racial discrimination and prejudice among "secrets of prejudice and friends" and "cedar house" are the themes of "Playboy", "their friends" and "cedar home". Prejudice is a not fundamental view, and this view usually comes from ignorance, but racial discrimination is a feeling of superiority to race due to prejudice. It also includes taking some ideas and turning them into action. People with prejudice are different, I hate another person. It is important to understand the assumptions and motives behind racist psychology - stereotypes, and prejudice against racial discrimination and discrimination. Usually, we understand the basic structure of hatred. However, not all race discrimination comes from hatred. It is important to understand the basis of many racial prejudices and discrimination. Here is a general view. As philosopher Emmanuel Kant argues, the roots of bad behavior are deeply rooted in human nature. In some cases there is something that almost guarantees to ignore the moral law of treating others with equality and kindness. Regardless of whether it is pride, reliance on power, or other malignant tendencies, our moral tendency will always tend to decay. Discussing racial discrimination in moral psychology makes it possible to understand assumptions and incentives behind biases and discrimination. It is at this point that I want to summarize - prejudice, freedom of speech, and some assumptions about the law. There are many proverbs about liberal values ​​and freedom of speech. However, those advocating altering "racial discrimination law" often quote liberal political philosophy, but rarely mention liberalism. Liberal philosopher Isaiah Berlin warned against placing freedom in all other values. He wrote: "Perhaps it may be necessary to limit the freedom of those who wish to rule over equality", because the full freedom of the wolf is the death of the lamb.

Muckelbauer R, Sarganas G, Gruneis A, Muller-Nordhorn J. Relationship between water consumption and weight: systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013; 98 (2): 282-299 Wang YC, Ludwig DS, Sonneville K, Goat maker SL. Influence of sweet calorie consumption of beverages on energy intake of children and adolescents Arch pediatrician 2009; 163 (4): 336-343 Tate DF, Turner McLeeby G, Lions E, etc. Replace calorie beverages with water or food drinks to reduce the weight of adults: Choose the main outcomes of a randomized clinical trial on health-choice daily care (CHOICE). Am J Clin Nutr. 2012; 95 (3): 555-563 Medical Research Institute. Reference to meals to water, potassium, sodium, chloride and sulfate. Electrolyte and water dietary intake standards group, medical laboratory, standing committee for scientific evaluation of dietary intake standards, Washington, DC, National Academy Press, 2005 Drewnowski A, Rehm CD, Water and Beverage Consumption of Children 4 to 13 in the United States: 2005-2010 NHANES Data Analysis. Nutr J. 2013; 12 (1): 85 Drewnowski A, Rehm CD, Constant F. American Adult Drinking Water and Beverage: A cross-sectional study using data from NHANES 2005-2010. BMC Public Health 2013; 13 (1): 1068 Kant AK, Graubard BI, Atchison EA. Regular water in the adult population in the United States, water in food and drink, and total moisture - nutrition, dietary habits and weight related: 1999 - 2006 national health nutrition survey. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009; 90 (3): 655-663 Factors related to low water intake in high school students in the US - National youth sports and nutrition research 2010. J Acad Nutr Diet. Park S, Blanck HM, Sherry B, Brener N, O'Toole T .. 2012; 112: 1421 - 1427 In the United States, water is taken as usual. After all, we chose dozens of mineral water at every supermarket, wine cellar, pharmacy - not to mention a variety of filtration systems and regular tap water. As you step into many restaurants you will be able to choose shiny water or spring water that is stationary soon. In Florida v. Georgia, Florida claimed that removal of drinking water and irrigation in Georgia damaged the downstream Apalachicola Bay and destroyed the commercial fishery in that area. Georgia argues that these outlets are reasonable and necessary to promote the state's agricultural economy and to maintain the growth of the Atlanta metropolis. This struggle has been delayed for decades and the risk is high. Today, 13 years ago, I decided to drink 8 cups of water a day. The choice for a more healthy life was different, then it came to thousands. It caused losing 150 pounds, and it took me more than a decade. Meanwhile, I had little to talk about that advice. This is my first attempt. I agree not to announce what it is, what it will do, to tell me what it is, and perhaps to show that other people are not alone. Choosing to drink plenty of water, having a healthy meal is also a lot of fun, and having a good day for a walk is easy for it to fail Goomba mushrooms. An annoying turtle turtle seems to be difficult to operate and never completely disappear. It takes time to acquire a more drinking habit. As we had plenty of drinks to choose other than water, we were spoiled. Water in bottled drinking water and plastic containers tends to be acidic and many estrogen toxins are lining, so please take water from the faucet.

From single culture to functionalism, several anthropological theories emerged at the beginning of the 20th century. The most important of these is functionalism. Bronislaw Malinowski was a famous anthropologist in the UK at that time and had a great influence on the development of this theory. Malinowski suggests that individuals have certain physiological needs and cultural developments to meet these needs. Malinowski believes that these needs are protection from nutrients, reproductive, shelter and enemies. At the beginning of the 20th century, a systematic critical investigation period was created and a comprehensive summary of a single theory of social and cultural evolution was rejected. Cultural anthropologists like Franz Boas (1858-1942) and his students, including Ruth Benedict and Margaret Mead are considered to be leaders of anthropology rejecting classical social evolution. They used complex ethnographic magazines and more rigorous empirical methods to prove that Spencer, Taylor, Morgan's theory is speculative and systematically distorted ethnographic data. The theory of 'stage' of evolution has been particularly criticized as fancy. In addition, they refuse to distinguish between "primitive" and "civilized" (or "modern"), that so-called primitive modern societies have the same history as the so-called civilized society and likewise evolutionary I point out. The scientific classification established by Carl Linnaeus is a necessary condition for every human classification scheme. In the 19th century, single row evolution (aka, classical social evolution) was a mixture of competition sociology and anthropology theory, and suggested that Western European culture is the ultimate evolution of human society culture. Social status is singular, from primitive to civilized, from agriculture to industry, and is popular among philosophers such as Friedrich Hegel, Immanuel Kant, Auguste Comte. From the 1920's to the 1950's, the Christian Bible was often used before the war in southern United States like Richard Furman and Thomas R. Writers like Cobb will strengthen the disadvantages created by blacks. And it is suitable for slavery Today, most anthropologists refuse three assumptions of the concept of progress in the 19th century and single marching. After the stewards, they seriously considered the relationship between culture and the environment and explained various aspects of culture. However, most modern cultural anthropologists adopt a general system approach that considers culture to be an emerging system and thinks that the entire social environment, including political and economic relations between cultures, must be considered . Due to the simple concept of 'progressive evolution', more modern and complex cultural evolution theory (such as the double inheritance theory described below) has been little attention in social science, and in some cases more humane things It gives way to. Method Some people refuse the entire evolutionistic thought but focus on historical emergencies, contact with other cultures, and the operation of cultural symbolic systems.

The classical tragedy Paradise Lost written by John Milton shows how the fallen angels lose the paradise they acquired and how this fall directly affects the fall of mankind . It is confused before everything happens; thorough darkness and filth. A strong presence, God is born of chaos and creates the heavens called heaven and the entire universe (4). Angels and angels filled with heaven dance in magnificent light (8). The highest archer Lucifer was in fourth place, accusing God's power and carefully removing it from him. John Milton Paradise Lost John Milton's Paradise Lost is a religious work, in many respects Milton's own autobiography of life. John Milton was promoted to Catholics and became Protestant. He later became a Calvinist. He can see his strong Calvinist faith throughout the lost paradise. Milton wants to be a great poet, but I do not believe this is the purpose of his life. He believes that he was placed here to serve God, and that everything he wrote should be there. Aspects provided by various roles and physical and psychological descriptions. Each of their views only reveals Milton's intention and the role of hell's poetry in this epic. Each character adds a new dimension to the physical and mental development of this different world. Narrator and Satan provide the most insightable insight about the dynamics of this underground world. Note to readers: John Milton's epic "Paradise Lost" is a poetic story of the fall of mankind in Genesis. Milton tells the story of the origin of man and the encounter with Satan by imagining a dialogue between devils exiled to hell, the birth of death, the war of heaven, and Adam and Eve and God and angels I will. In contrast, John Dawn used the sonnet structure of the Holy sonnet to explain the full dependence of man on God. This article discusses the theology and imagination of the Renaissance poet who brought biblical ideas to literature to clarify the rationality and beauty of their beliefs. On the rationality of Milton's lost paradise and John Dunne's "sacred Sonnets" - Acting theology in Christian religion Both English poets began writing scripts. When Milton announced his epic "Paradise Lost" in 1667, he solved the largest possible theme: the collapse of mankind in the Garden of Eden. By contrast, when Wordsworth wrote his epic in 1850, he wrote 400 pages of "overture" about his inner self-indulgent internal feelings. During the transition between the two writers, the atmosphere of the knowledge of Europe experienced fundamental change for enlightenment. In the Milton era, he can prove the existence of things in the outside world, as God guarantees that things remain stable. But in the days of Wordsworth, Immanuel Kant, one of the greatest philosophers, has been distinguishing things from things with us. This distinction known as Copernicus's philosophical revolution is a very basic today, but it has revolutionized philosophical thinking to show that our mind functions as a filter to perceive information It was.

The last philosophers of philosophy and art come from all over the world and from all over the world and they use their genius to solve philosophical problems in many different areas of study. When they discover reasoning about us, they publish their findings in literature to share their abundant knowledge with other people. Among many philosophers they added shine to us with their excellent knowledge and German philosophers Immanuel Kant and Friedrich Nietzsche stand out. In this article, we are starting a conversation as this problem is a very important issue. How we respond will reveal our basic philosophy of all art. Unfortunately, the philosophy I frequently encounter in the culture of the Church is that it is best to do useless, and the worst is the destructive philosophy. In a nutshell, art is useless unless it has certain features. On the west side, many churches interpret this section and other churches to focus only on practical and utilitarian activities, that is, activities that clearly affect evangelism. This directly affects the role we see in the church. In extreme cases, a strict utilitarian view makes it possible to evaluate art due to direct results, which leaves room for art such as art, music, drama, paintings, novels. Freedom of expression One of the features of philosophy is the question "What is philosophy?" It is itself a philosophical problem. But what is the problem "What is art is not a matter of art. The problem is philosophical. The same can be said about the question "What is history?" And, "What is the law?" Each is a philosophical problem. These problems are the foundation of educational philosophy, historical philosophy, law philosophy, and other "philosophy" disciplines. Each of these fields seeks to determine the basis, basic categories and methods of a particular institution or research area. Therefore, there is a close relationship between philosophy and other areas of human activity. This relationship can be seen by studying two areas: (1) philosophy and science, and (2) philosophy and religion. The difference between philosophy, science, and art is mainly on its subject and how to reflect, transform and express it. In a sense, art, like philosophy, depicts the relationship between people and his spiritual world, and the relationship between individuals in the interaction with the world, reflecting the reality in relationships between people. We live in a purely pure world, but in a world that is known and changed, everything in the world is given a "human perspective". Demand, thinking, goal, ideal, pleasure, the world of pain, this world is part of the whirlpool of our existence. If we want to eliminate this "human factor" from the world, it may not be able to express as a close and close relationship with humans.

In some cases the operation of Ms. Macbeth, women are men's fallen. Macbeth is a typical example of how women affect men. If Mrs Macbeth is not there, Macbeth shows that it will live and prosper. Mrs Macbeth is a small but very important part of drama Macbeth. She always stood next to Macbeth and told him what she thought she had to do. When Macbeth left in the war he told him that before he received the title, the witch greeted Scotland coders Thane and the king who might not know how to accomplish this before he got home It was. Disclaimer: The Macbeth free paper on this website was donated by anonymous users for reference. The free Macbeth research paper on this page (Mr. Macbeth Personality Analysis) should not be regarded as a sample of our online writing service. If you need new and competent research / writing at Macbeth, please use the professional writing service offered by our company. Feature Id tries to achieve satisfaction through sex, money, power and so on. Mrs Macbeth is a good example. Because she may feel guilty about it later, but her identity is the best. She wants more power and does anything to get it. As Glamis and Cawdor are not enough for her, she also wants to be a queen. The classic tragedy of William Shakespeare's classic Macbeth Macbeth represents an atypical woman with Mrs. Macbeth's character. This article explores her personality Macbeth 's unique woman Shakespeare' s Macbeth draws the indomitable, clever character of Mrs. Macbeth through bold and evil behavior. Her role is the subject of this article. In her criticism, Shakespeare's tragic hero Lily · B · Campbell is investigating the impact of sin on the life of First Lady. The fifth act makes a result of passion and passion a fatal crime. . - According to a classic view, the tragedy causes pity and fear to the audience. Did Macbeth do this? In this play, the tragedy clearly influenced the spectator 's view of Macbeth. In Macbeth of Shakespeare, due to the tragic events that occurred during the play, Macbeth 's character gradually collapsed. This directly affects the audience's view and idea of ​​Macbeth, causing compassion and fear among the audience. In Macbeth of Shakespeare, Mrs Macbeth was often seen as a statue of the devil, its evil operation brought the murder of Duncan. In fact, gender is a prominent theme in the drama. In this article, we discuss that Macbeth reflects the harsh expectations of sex, and that the protagonists are dominated and constrained by these fixed ideas. Macbeth also reflects the deep distrust of women in Shakespeare's society. - "The reality is that Nazis are people like us, the nightmare is what they demonstrated and proved human ability" (quoted from Arendt 1945, Cohen 1994). The purpose of this paper is to solve the "extreme evil" theory and to judge how it is incorporated into Hannah Arendt's paper "meaning of evil". This will be done by solving the main evil concept of Emanuel Kant, which is initially "extreme" and summarizes his meaning.

In Mill's Utilitarian thesis, Mill observed that many people worked together and misunderstood utilitarianism by enjoying the same idea and concept. In fact, Mill said that utility is described as being a kind of happiness, not pain. Mill focused on the relationship between public interest and happiness and decided that utility could be regarded as the principle of maximum happiness. This principle insists that action is correct as they tend to promote happiness and mistakes as they tend to produce a reversal of happiness. Explain what is utilitarian utilitarianism. What kind of procedures should Utilitarians take when determining a series of actions? What is the difference between Million's Utilitarianism and Bentham? Why does Mill act according to utilitarianism? Next, I will explain how to think Kant's criticism against Mill as a utilitarian. Finally, I will evaluate the credibility of this criticism. Eat factory - meat on farm. Explain the main argument of Alasdair Norcross on why it is morally wrong to eat meat on the factory farm. Then explain what Kant is based on this argument, what Epicurean is based for this argument, and how Norcross reacts to them. Evaluate next: what do you agree with (if any) and why? Do you think that it is ethically acceptable to eat meat raised in the factory? The dominant philosophy of Britain in the 1800s was Utilitarianism developed by Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill. Utilitarians believe that the greatest happiness is a trial of good and evil for most people. They believe that all existing social systems, in particular law and government, have to be changed to satisfy the greatest happiness trials. In "Women's obedience" (1869), Muller wrote that legal subordination of women to men should be replaced by "the principle of perfect equality". This idea was revolutionary in the Mill era. Concept of utility principle given by John Stuart Mill. In the article "What is Utilitarianism" #, Mill proposed a theory of utilitarianism, he summarized his "utility" or "principle of maximum happiness" (Mill 89). The focus of Mill is "happiness" based on behavior, # lack of happiness and pain, or "unhappiness", # lack of goods and satisfaction, not a related intention (Mill 89). After evaluating Mill's principle, I will finish this. Utilitarian utilitarianism is the ethical theory of consequentialism. According to the results, the behavior is right or wrong. John Stuart Mill is an important philosopher who developed practical ideas. Utilitarian believes that actions that bring more happiness in the world are correct actions and actions that bring pain and less happiness are wrong. Utilitarianism can be divided into different versions. Utilitarian utilitarianism is a moral theory, originally named Jeremy, as a guiding principle of action under certain circumstances. Bentham's hedonist (a happy follower) proposed "principle". Utility called 'maximum amount of maximum happiness'

In ancient times, there were countries full of strength and strength. As the country, like other military buildup of military forces, the economy seems to be eternal, and as strong as to establish the government on behalf of those people. This seems to be a country setting examples for all countries. This is a prosperous bigger. This is a great Roman Empire. The rules of this country never seem to end, but this is far from the truth. A huge prosperity resulted in a bad straight drop and eventually it collapsed. Like wheat, if two things happen the same way, they tend to fall the same way. So in my opinion, the reason is the decline of Rome like the United States like a rise in economic, social and political aspects, similar to the rise of Rome, the decline of the United States - the reason in terms of ideology in Rome and the USA In the order of most profound similarity,. Of course, this is not a coincidence: establishing fathers, their admirers and students, America hopes to shine in the Potomac River and become a new Rome. Thereafter, the new Rome will not be destined to the same old Roman way till the end - if there is a suitable model to emulate Rome: but I guess they are trying to solve the problem Is not there? Ancient Rome encountered political paralysis like modern America. In Rome, most voters are not a problem. Although it was the emperor of the Roman Empire who entered this political disparity, although it brought domestic stability, it only accelerated the collapse of Rome. For this country political paralysis of a great American patriot may be a melancholy moment, while Scott Crow watches a great opportunity to do great things. "In this country, we have not explored a series of paths along the way," Raven said. "The dominant paradigm tells us that there are cultural, economic, other alternative political life, no choice, we are voters and consumers - this country of more complex social relations" Historians have been fascinated by the decline of great civilizations like ancient Greece and Rome. But for human beings, no more important lessons, rather than the collapse of the United States which has finished the era of virtue invisible in the dark age, and not including autumn than the whole planet. Ultimately even before the birth of the country was released, it destroys the powers of the United States of philosophy. This proposition can also be understood and the sun will not rise tomorrow, "Make sure that it does not become more contradictory Meaning: His philosophical skepticism of David Hume 1748" Investigate human understanding, "I wrote it rises. So we need to waste to prove that falsehood. 1781 ", so I know that it denies knowledge to make room for the necessary faith," he writes the criticism of pure reason Immanuel Kant "he founded, the founding of the United States 5 Published later years

The death penalty - When the time to turn your face will come ... If you commit a murder, he must die. In this case, there is no substitute to satisfy the legal requirement of legal justice. Even under the most tragic circumstances, there is no death or living. Therefore, unless it is a criminal, there is no equality between crime and revenge. "Emmanuel Kant. Currently in the United States about 2,000 men, women and children are waiting for" condemned prisoners ". Federal courts and state courts increasingly approve the death penal law, allowing for faster execution. The Bible says that a person should turn another cheek, but it also points out that punishment should be "eyes for the eyes" and "teeth on the teeth". The death penalty exists from the beginning, and it may last until the end. The Supreme Court ruled that the death penalty is unconstitutional in the eighth and fourteenth revision of 1972. This volatility is said to be voluntary, but the capital punishment recovered in 1976. The death penalty is not a reasonable punishment for homicide. Should abolish capital punishment Christians take a different position on the need for capital punishment. Some believe that the teachings of Jesus condemned another God's death sentence and the Gospel of John the Bible in Luke and Matthew's Gospel Chapter 8 verse 7, and some of the letters of Romans 13: 3-4 Some think that it supports the death penalty. There are many branches in Christianity (sects), and their position on the death penalty is different. Traditionally the Roman Catholic Church accepted the death penalty in accordance with the theology of Thomas Aquinus (he accepted the death penalty as a necessary deterrent and preventive measure, but not as a means of revenge.In the history of the Catholic Church, Pope John 2 The world condemned the death penalty and the Catholic Church The doctrine of the Catholic Church believes that should it be avoided unless it is the only way to protect the death penalty from the criminals' society. Religion is the oldest argument in books and can shake in both directions. Jesus said that "Turn your face" and said that the death penalty should not be used as a form of revenge. According to a report, when a woman was cast to die for adultery, Jesus said to the crowd that he should throw the first stone "he did not sin". In Judaism they believe in "eyes for the eyes" and "teeth on the teeth". In Islam it is stipulated that the death penalty should be used for certain crimes such as homicide and adultery. Nonetheless, neither religion has a long tradition of justice and sympathy, and Islam, even if the death penalty is at that moment, if the family of the victim permits the accused the death penalty should be enforced I say not.

The best people in most situations? Or people who show positive results in most situations As a lawyer, I often see "optimistic" clients involved in new and exciting business ideas and partnerships. After 26 years of experience, I know that most business ideas and partnerships have failed. The worst is that I am professionally trained and responsible for warning and preventing harmful consequences. Customers often call me "dream killer". I am not an "optimistic" person. I sometimes joke as a future business owner / partner should give me $ 25,000.00 in cash, I should kick their testicles and let them say they appreciate me within a year Said. I know that some customers truly hope to follow my advice. In other words, success is impossible without risk Sometimes I think that 'it is a good thing to be more optimistic'. Looking at the world through a simpler and more positive shot should make life more fun. I do not know how 'optimist' reacts to suppressing negative experience. Do they question doubts about their judgment? Or whether to blame business partners and other participants. I want to learn more about how optimismists deal with bad results when thinking from the heart that optimists are positive. I expressed myself as "realistic optimist" through high school and university. This is just a word, you want the best, but prepare for the worst. I strive hard to achieve great, lofty and ambitious goals, but I prepare mentally and emotionally - not to achieve my goals, but to accomplish my new goals We must turn our attention to. I got a good service - I received a scholarship in the town of Turnpike in the countryside of Pennsylvania and soared up to the Ivy League school. I did a research fellowship with a respected philosopher and published a paper on the history of liberalism and Hawaiian Emmanuel Kant. Things are ups and downs It is very well coordinated, happy, always large and looking good - an optimist is strongly cast as the best way. Even if you face adversity, optimismists still want a favorable outcome. Their beautiful view of life depends on the principle of idealism and often misses the fundamental nature of people. Studies have shown that optimistic optimism often brings a happy life, but it is easy to become unaware of the world and to be deceived easily. Convincing an optimist is not a difficult task, and this is often the reason they are in trouble. Optimists are typical examples of people who want others to do the right thing, even if they understand their nature. Optimism comes from Latin Optimus, which means "best", explains what optimism people always do in their circumstances and expects good things to happen. Optimism tends to believe, expect or expect things to get better. Even if a bad thing happens, such as losing a job, the optimist will see a faint light of hope. For me, getting fired will trigger my own business. When I cleaned my office, my idea rolled with the possibility of the future. Without such a promotion, I can not make a leap in self-employment. After all, losing your job is a good thing.

British Irish race discrimination and treatment has changed dramatically over the past several centuries. Part of the reason is in the paradigm surrounding dynamic and fluctuating relationships between the two countries. It is caused by the Irish colonization, conquest and westernization as a British entity from the 18th century to the 19th century, the formation of Ireland free state by the dichotomy over the British government issue, and the subsequent withdrawal of Ireland from the UK Ireland problem that was further strengthened when the Republic of Ireland was formed in 1949 This article explores and studies the concept of social exclusion related to Irish identity in the UK. I will explore the social situation of the Irish people who live in the UK. When Irish first generation and second generation gather, Irish people become the largest ethnic group in the UK today. Indeed, since 1981, the overall size of the British - born Irish population is stable at around 845,000 people. (M, Hickman & amp; B, Walter 1997). According to a recent report by the Racial Equality Committee (Hickman and Walter, 1997), the important experience of prejudice and discrimination in the Irish and Ireland communities is evident. I will explain this issue in detail later, but some immigrants from Ireland did not go well and some people experienced some shortcomings. A traveler in Ireland (Irish: meaning "walking people") is a traditional cyclic group that keeps on various traditions. I speak English mainly, but some people use Shelter and other similar Kant. Most of them live in Ireland and include a large community of British and American. Its origins are controversial. Tourist rights organizations have long promoted the national status of the Irish government and eventually succeeded in 2017. Many different theories have been proposed to explain the origins of Irish nomads. Genetic evidence does not support that they may be recommendations for Roma extraction, and genetic evidence has nothing to do with the Roma community. Another theory is the origin of Gaelic language Travelers in Ireland are considered a national group under the laws of the UK and Ireland. An ethnic group is usually defined as a group whose members are identical to each other based on its common common genealogy or ancestor. Another characteristic of ethnic identity is the uniqueness of the group and the recognition of the common cultural, linguistic, religious, behavioral or biological characteristics of the group. The European Parliament's Racial Discrimination / Africa Phobia Committee considers it to be one of the most discriminated ethnic groups in Ireland, but its position remains unstable because of the lack of extensive legal approval . Travelers are considered negatively from settlers and said they were illegally settled in isolated, antisocial, "dropped out", "not compatible", or involved in crime or beggars, or land owned by others It is considered.

There is a long ladder that has not yet climbed: that is not enough. If you know me it means that you will benefit from your time. "This is the turning point of Dante In the text, Dante is shocked by being exhausted by what he saw on the street, he fell to the ground and cried, he wanted not to go any further In the lecture we are talking about other parts that are solved in the story, such as conflicting the true way so that we can not reward this trip without being deceived by sin . Relationship between Dante and Virgil in Dante 's Inferno' s Canto XIV In Canto XIV of Inferno of Dante, Virgil explained the statue of an old man in Crete. Dante uses Crete 's old man as a metaphor of Virte' s legacy to clarify the essence of the relationship between Dante and Virgil. At the beginning of this metaphor, Dante explained in detail the magnificence of the Greek empire and Roman civilization and explained it in a systematic manner. "Once selected, Virgil explained." As a reliable birthplace / national epic regarded as Rome, it has been very popular since its publication. VirgilBeatrice sends Virgil back to Earth. As the poet Virgil lived in Christianity to regain Dante and serve as his guide to hell and purgatory he lived with other justice non-Christians of Ante-Inferno. Virgil served as his guide, for he praised that Virgil's work is higher than all other poets. As Dante was driven into the forest by the wolf, Virgil appeared in Hell 's first place. He recognized himself and felt the journey of the store. Dante's response to self introduction of Virgil can feel the special role played by the heathen poet in Dante's life and also serves his salvation. Dante insisted that he was a disciple and he learned how to use his crafts from Master Virgil, but this time she "fight against famous saints because she trembles my blood vessels and pulses" -90) Canto 3 is our first contact with hell. When Dante approached, he suffered from the voice of a sinner waiting to cross Acheron - a river as a foyer for hell. Karen's card initially refused to accept Dante. Virgil strongly insists on some comfort and advice to Dante as Dante passes through. This Kant is very noisy. When Dante walked under the arch, he could hardly see anything. Gangs anxiously to cross, aspire to cross, be bitten by insects, bleed. There are even some ruthless and meandering things about how Dante's noise expression is expressed: "Unfamiliar tongue, terrible accents, painful words, cry of anger ..." This is designed to be overwhelming Actually, I imagine that the aisle enters the darkness, just listen to the voice of the person who is supposed to enter the hell.

Stein 2 Some people who lived for a while were called era of reason, but they knew that many people know the invention and progress and improve the quality of life. These benefits are provided during the experiment and provide some ideas for special people who constantly change our way of thinking about life. Many people have discovered that these findings have brought about a great revival to mankind, but others refuse these new improvements and feel as if they are rebelling against God. These years are filled with world discovery, conflict, and new vision. The enlightenment of French literature in the era of intelligent era and rationalism is the period after the classical era of France in the 1700s. During this time philosophers have focused on rationality as the best way to learn. It explores education, law philosophy and political issues. It attacks tyranny, social injustice, superstition, and ignorance. In this time, progress has been made in the fields of anatomy, astronomy, chemistry, mathematics and physics. - French Neoclassicalism In the 17th century, the era of the King Louis XIV, we saw the era of neoclassical ideals, the three largest masters of France, Corneille, Racine and Molière. With the decline of the religious play in the middle of the 16th century, French play slowly developed. The French Renaissance began in 1630 and ended in 1700 Many critical thinkers believed that religion and reason are hostile in the age of enlightenment in the 17th and 18th centuries. For them, the Middle Ages or the "era of faith" is therefore the opposite of the era of reason. Kant and Voltaire were attacking the Middle Ages as an era of religious decline, and Jimbo in the "History of the decline and decline of the Roman Empire" expressed their contempt for "garbage in the dark ages". But like Petrarch, he saw himself at the cutting edge of the "new era" and criticized it for centuries before his own time, as was the enlightenment writer . The age of reason is the movement of the 18th century where medieval mysticism, religion, superstition continue. In the era of reason, it shows how humans pursue knowledge and the universe by looking at themselves. During this period, the concepts and ideas of actions previously held by humans may be questioned both verbally and in writing; people are afraid of being shown as being infidels and burned. This is the beginning of a free society where individuals freely pursue individual happiness and freedom. In the political and social aspects, the concept of the medieval empire was abandoned. The era of reason includes the shorter period called the era of enlightenment; during this period scientific thinking and exploration experienced tremendous change. New ideas are full of new ideas, people want to explore these ideas freely

Aubade is a poetry model, a poem about the arrival of dawn. It prospered in France later in the Middle Ages ("vocabulary terms"). Oberd was originally sung outside at dawn (Wheeler). Some formats are about two lovers separated at dawn ("Aubade"). Aubades with about two lovers away in the morning may be complicated poems. This is a poem about the end of the night, but about the beginning of the next day. Some people are satisfied with how lovers are going to break up, but they are together one day. Now, since we start at dawn, Purgatorio's Kant I became the captain of the Provence literature from the Italian Orbs, Arbu and Aruba. This song - the song of the dawn, this song is overturning the erotic lyrics tradition of Provence's poetry in many respects, the dawn has become an unpleasant moment for the loved ones to leave, and now the last wonderful It will be time and at last the pilgrim can continue to draw The poet can continue to draw and literally map the journey and can sail or send the metaphor as he wants - he can use I will For thousands of years, poetry is a way of constantly expressing emotions, and perhaps one of the most beautiful poems is poetry of love. Poems let emotions express emotions and express emotions so that emotions are more satisfied than traditional speaking and writing by using artists, images, symbols, allegories, and other poetic tools. Love poems show the beauty of love and have the ability to do emotional lives. - Music and poet literature have clear relationships between music and poetry, making them too numerous. Music and poetry can be divided into various expressions. This means that if the meaning of music or poetry changes, the perception of audience and readers will be different. . Music and poetry bring together memories, emotions and motivation to the audience.

There are three fields of aesthetics, morality, religion. The moral field is merely a transitional field, and its best expression is a confession as a negative act. The scope of aesthetics is a range of immediacy, ethics is a range of requirements (this requirement is infinite, it is always bankrupt), religion is a range of realization, for example, that when a person satisfies a charity organization it is not satisfied Please be careful. A box or gold bag, a confession produced infinite space, and the result is a religious contradiction: it appears in 70,000 liters of water, but it is happy again. Reasonable human condition 5, Kant, Agnosticism and anarchism: Theology - Political Expo - Part 1, radical agnosticism, Section 1.1, Introduction This work is a sequel to Either / Or released by Kierkegaard two years ago. There, an aesthetic and ethical stage was raised, but Kierkegaard did not address religious areas except appendix. Here, he returned to the first two stages, then proceeded to a religious stage which occupies about two thirds of the book. In short, at the lifestyle stage, we treat each of the three stages of beauty, morality, religion, etc. continuously, "the place of existence" of life. He previously agreed with the word "stage" in his writings, but I do not think that they should be in the age of life, but as a paradigm of existence, not in turn. Indeed, the term sphere presence occurs more frequently than term term. In his own journal Kierkegaard noticed the difference between Stages On Life's Way and its predecessor. Frater Taciturnus reminds the reader many times that his name is not religious, but it is not so. As the entire work still works based on pseudonyms, the reader needs to remember that in the entire work, Kiakegaard approached a religious stage in an aesthetic way. Many of Quidam's diary entries start with "Today's Today". Therefore, his work is a memory. Memories are clearly a feature of the aesthetic stage. This is a retroactive behavior. Commitment to loved ones is an example of positive morality. Kierkegaard is anxious about his positive passion for the ideal (God). This is a religious stage

Let's learn about Descartes's skepticism. In order to begin to understand René Descartes' suspicion, it is necessary to stop prejudice and earlier judgment and start with a clean list of "to discover some of the ultimate truths based on all ideas" (Kolak , Pg. 225). Descartes is skeptical of his beliefs and is embarrassed about his ignorance. He began to complete the task of finding absolute truth. Among them he is based on his beliefs. 1637 - Descartes' method papers were published with one of the classical papers of this century. These articles appeared shortly after Galileo condemned and decided that Descartes would not release his huge "world". The importance of combining words with intermediaries is almost not exaggerated. 1638 - The second book by Galileo, mainly "Two new scientific discourses", was published by Protestant Leiden outside Italy. This work attracted the work on Galileo's previous sports and the second "new science" (in retrospect, Galileo was not so successful) dealt with the strength of the material. René Descartes, Methodology, Galileo Galilei, Letters to Tuscany Christina: Pope's interrogation in 1633: Galileo "Sir Isaac Newton", "Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy" Manuel Kant, What is Enlightenment , Dennis Diderot, "Observations of encyclopedias of art and science" Voltaire, philosophical dictionary: British model, Mary Worthcraft, advocacy of women's rights, Jean Jacques Rousseau, association contract Descartes in "methodology" support his argument for immortality of the soul through different arguments. In methodology, Descartes is trying to explain his reasoning method. He explains the development of this approach through a short autobiographical sketch combined with philosophical arguments. Descartes has five parts in his "methodology", which shifts his argument from light theory to human structure theory. Descartes is thinking about the fact that animals resemble humans, as animals have many organs like humans, separating them from humans is a lack of speech or reasoning power. He regards this difference as evidence of a human "rational or calm soul". He observes the mysterious relationship between the soul and the human body and concludes that the soul must live outside the human body.

On July 5, 1852, Mr. Rochester's opposition party asked Frederick Douglas of the freed slaves to celebrate the independence of the United States. Douglas accepted this request and made a powerful speech to explain and demonstrate his true beliefs and emotions about the event. He believes that their decision to ask him as a spokesperson on that day is a ridicule of the continued standing of black Americans as his past and slaves. Nonetheless, Douglas skillfully used various methods to compose his speech, made the audience take him seriously, and made twice about slavery issues in the United States twice. Frederic Douglas's "July 4th" speech was the most famous speech by Frederick Douglas, who claims discontinentists and citizenship. It collected 500 to 600 people. Douglas talked to slaves on July 4th and showed slaves that they have nothing to celebrate. They are not free, and independence celebrated elsewhere in the country does not apply to them. "When we ask now whether we are living in the age of enlightenment now, the answer is" No, but I am living in the age of enlightenment "(Kant). Enlightenment is a concept often discussed in modern society research. Because it makes society challenge society to accept criticism of social justice. However, due to the restrictions of the ruling party, there is a tension between the enlightenment goal and the actual enlightenment process. The validity and superior structure of Frederick Douglas's speech on July 4 are obvious. His oral discussion was a powerful objection to that argument and his audience was forced to take account of the unmistakable mistakes in their country's policies and methods of slavery. Douglas also forced his audience to take his words seriously, build his trust, know his audience, and skillfully constituted and implement his speech. The final result of his efforts was a provocative speech at the time, and in the future it became a historical communication. Douglas successfully announced a speech demonstrating clearly and effectively the absurdity of American slavery, allowing viewers to think about their position and decide how to act in the future.

The greatest philosopher of ancient Greece Plato was born in Athens in 428 BC or 427 BC. It is a nobleman family. He studied in Socrates and he played a role in many conversations. He took part in the Socrates trial and the traumatic experience may lead him to try to design an ideal society. After the death of Socrates, he tried to learn widely. After 12 years he returned to Athens and founded his college, one of the earliest organized schools in Western civilization. Plato's student is Aristotle. Several other effects of Plato are Pythagoras, Anakusagorasu and Palmenide Plato was written extensively, and most of his work escaped. His work appeared in the form of dialogue, and several characters are discussing topics while interrogating each other. With this form Plato can think of various ideas and let the reader decide which ideas are valid. Plato details the format of dualism that there is a world of ideal shape that is different from the world of perception. People living in the cave can only see the glittering shadows that are reflected on the actual wall outside. This influences many later philosophers, especially neoprene tonics and gnostics, and resembles some of Hindu's double metaphysical views. Plato died in 347 BC. In the Middle Ages he broke into Aristotle. His work was preserved by descendants of Islamic scholars and reintroduced to the west during the Renaissance. Since then, he has had a strong influence on philosophy and natural science and social science. The exact order of dialogue is unknown, but the following is an agreement order based on internal evidence. In these conversations, Socrates is a central figure and is considered to express his own view. This is the only remaining record of Socratic doctrine; therefore they are called Socrates' dialogue. In these conversations, Plato began to express his views with Socrates' scorpion. Seminar and Republic are the most important works of this period Later dialogue was a deep development of philosophy expressed in early dialogue; these are the most difficult works of Plato. It is noteworthy that Plato wrote "dialogue", Aristotle wrote the paper. When a person reads Plato's conversation like Aristotle's thesis, people will not understand the conversation. Reading Plato just as we read Aristotle is one of the fates that we encountered in the English speaking community. Previous generations of British and American thinkers have read Plato as if they are reading Aristotle's thesis. Augustine, Aristotle, the traditional language landscape seen by logical positivists, in our understanding of "metaphysics" of "subjectivity" (Descartes, Kant) as "rationality as a way of understanding" Discussed. Deep connection In this traditional figure, the symbol represents an object (theme), but it is also a symbol of a concept or image in the speaker's mind (frame). A conceptual or psychological image is the manifestation of the speaker's heart and brain. Our understanding of Socrates comes from many conversations Plato wrote in 399 years. In almost every conversation, we all know more than 30 people. Socrates is the main lecturer. Plato's dialogue style is important - this is the Socratic style he used throughout the process. In the dialogue of Socrates, questions and answers, questions and answers, question and answer formats are used. This is a dialectic. Socrates will discuss two aspects of the problem in order to draw conclusions. Then, this conclusion is contrary to another hypothesis. It may be difficult to understand why Socrates is regarded as a bull fly!

Inside of heathens: "darkness", "corruption", the discourse of colonialism in romanticism and colonialism, Tim Fulford and Peter Kitson said that most scholars detailed romantic sentences Relationship with British colonialist imperialism Fulford and Kitson pointed out that "the romantic era is a colonial history basin" and based on the "white burden" political philosophy of the UK It shows the birth of the empire (3). By reading romantic texts in the historical and political context of colonialism and imperialism, Fulford and Kitson agree with the background of the material, colonial process, which is consistent with the colonial form they imagined I hope to attribute "romantic text" to the material to be. . Michael Altman's infidels, Hindu, and Hindus criticize the American Hindu history, the nationalism of the formation from the colonial era to the Chicago World Parliament, and the criticism of the Orientalist editorials to the revised standard "transcendental It criticized with the principle. Theologian - Vivekananda - 1965 "Track (xvii). Altman used a genealogical method to display his historical data, and how the" derogatory concept "of Indian religion is As a discourse foil, and for white people, it showed whether it was used as a new American scarecrow. Altman believes that when these Americans talk about religion in India they are truly "talking about themselves" (xxi) and constitute their own ethnic, ethnic and religious identity ( 140) Altman, Michael. Pagan, Hindu, Hindus: Indian representative office in India, 1721-1893. New York: Oxford University Press, 2017.xxii + 175. $ 34.95 (Hardcover) Altman first opened three religious goods to load the term - pagan, Gentoo, Hindoo First, Cotton Mather rejected all forms of "pagan" religion in 1721 (1); By 1784, Hannah Adams's "liberalism" account tried to describe "justice" more than in her so-called "Gentoos" "forgiving" faith (16); in 1811, Claudio Buchanan's "evangelicals Representative of the group stated that the religion of "Hinduism" is violence and superstition (30-1). There are several such "evangelical" records, Altman says that missionary organizations "use promotion for evangelism and take advantage of Indian's achievement to increase their institutional power" It is proving (38) Altman, Michael. Pagan, Hindu, Hindus: Indian representative office in India, 1721-1893. New York: Oxford University Press, 2017.xxii + 175. $ 34.95 (Hardcover) The colonial discouragement praised the Burmese Buddhist's generosity and partly condemned the "superstition" and "retreat" of Hindus and Muslims like caste in the colony of Burma. This discourse has been accepted by the Burmese nationalists and unfortunately is used to justify the violence of Rohingya Muslim. Even though we believe that most Buddhists and members of any other religious group have pacifism and forgiving beliefs there is no reason to expect them to be pacifist and tolerant. As Immanuel Kant understands, we are not transparent to ourselves and we can not fully understand why we are doing this. To be sure whether we took reasons to believe that we did (such as "This is right"), or whether we are psychological, neurophysiological, or completely opaque You can not. Economic reason

Anarchy: The political philosophy is symbolic of inharmony and image that "human beings are freed from the restraint and detention of the government, truly releasing human thought from inconsistency and religious domination" - Ai Ma Gaman . In the late 1800s urbanization began to influence the cities, the industrial revolution began to guide the government to gain more and more power. "The state is authority, its power" - Mikhail Bakunin. With the development of the government, people believe that the country is worried about its power rather than people's interests. Anarchy: a noun. I do not have any political authority. Political chaos and chaos There is no common principle as a common standard or purpose. (American Traditional Dictionary) Chaos is a political philosophy wrapped in misunderstanding. This misunderstanding is caused by the diversity of the themes of anarchism itself and can not be characterized by a simple slogan or television plug. In theory, chaos gives individuals the most personal freedom. Anarchy is more than just politics, which is a way of life including politics, pragmatism and personal lifestyle. The concept of disorder is seen as the major organization category of International Relations (IR), and it is distinguished from similar disciplines such as political science and political philosophy. In this article, we provide analytical review of academic literature on chaos in IR from both conceptual level and theoretical level. First, it distinguishes the three meanings of the concept of anarchy: (1) lack of common advantages in the field of interaction; (2) confusion or confusion; (3) nominally equal entities, and between sovereign states Horizontal relationship. The first and third senses of "disorder" are in the center of IR. Secondly, it is based on three major families of IR theory in which disorder is the focal hypothesis: (1) realism and neolitism, (2) British school theory (international social approach), and (3) peace of the Republic of Kant Research on anarchy, political science and international relations has no power superior to the nation state, it can mediate their dispute and enforce international law. The term anarchy comes from the ancient Greek fundamental anarchist ("no authority"), indicating that there is no rule of law or settlement government. Prevalence in national relations is a fundamental premise of realism and is a school of outstanding thinking in international relations theory. Realists think that international law does not actually impose almost any restrictions on national behavior. In the absence of superpowers and arbitrators, particularly powerful countries do not have mandatory behavioral norms. The harsh environment among the provinces is both a lack of legally enforceable international law in a strict sense and violent confusion in a broad sense.

Candy tells the friendship between him and his old dog, and how they helped them to connect together. George associates this with Renee and believes that the longer they are together, the more they can become friends. The results showed that he saw his relationship with Lenny George tied it to Kant and his dog. This proves that Lenny made George recognize that he could be a friend. Renny also informed George of his responsibility. He can find this example when he learns that Lenny has nothing to do with George. John Steinbeck's mouse and human relationship is indispensable to everyone's life. True friends will not make life dull, dark and sad. Loneliness is the main theme of The Mice and Men, George and Lennie stand out in Slim, Crooks, Candy. They have a unique and special connection to each other. Each role affects other roles. Although Steinbeck's description of relationships between men seems to be negligible, in fact it is immortal. Mouse and male settings took place at the ranch where George and Renee encountered Slim, Candy, Crook, Carlson, Curly, Curly 's wife. During frustration, the author John Steinbeck wrote a novel called "Mouse and Man". This novel was held in Southern California during the same period. John Steinbeck says that friendship is a very precious thing in the novel "The Mouse and the Man." This book will help you through how difficult your friendship is and express how you can help you move forward. Two of them are in John Steinbeck's classic novel "The Mouse and the Man", a proof of true friendship is the theme. Steinbeck used two immigrant workers, Lenny and George, to explain the theme of the novel. This novel was in the Great Depression in California around 1937. At that time, the position of Renny and George was the way Steinbeck painted that period. Rennie is a big and strong, half-hearted person. I will explain how Steinbeck is exploring the complex relationship between George Milton and Lennie Small using John Steinbeck's book "Of Mice and Men". Steinbeck's "The Mouse and the Man" took up the plight of migrant workers in California during the Depression, focusing on two non-regular migrant workers in George and Renee. John Steinbeck explained Lennie as a very simple person, but he was indulging in the innocence of a little boy without noticing it. Lennie is impulsive, obsessive and instinctive, like drinking water when drinking water without thinking. He can not control the movement of his body. Because he is a semi-intelligent person who can not measure or control physical strength. In other words, it can be said that his physique is not consistent with his personality. Compared with George, Lenny is big and heavy, strong and smart. "A man walking behind, a big guy, no face, there is a big and pale eyes."

The issue of the existence of God has been discussed throughout human history and all philosophers from Socrates to Emmanuel Kant are discussing the argument. Since this topic grew so big, I invented and used a lot of evidence to prove or refute the existence of God. However, I do not have an answer yet, so I would like to know if there is an answer. Therefore, I will try to ascertain whether it is possible to prove the existence of God philosophically in this article. Before you start writing your paper, you have to decide several points. There is much debate about the existence of God about the existence of God. For a long time everyone wanted to prove the existence of God. Some people think that God exists and is proved by many philosophical or scientific foundations and religious reasons. On the other hand, others do not believe in the existence of God, and their foundation is proved from many theoretical and scientific point of view. Many people try to prove the existence of God with reason. After Descartes proves its existence, people will consider the truth about the essence of God, evidence of the existence of God, and the nature of material objects. The main task in Descartes' meditation is to design a system that allows him to understand the truth. He wants to lay the foundation of all further philosophy The medieval society believed that humans existed because God wants them to exist. Descartes does not doubt the existence of God, I doubt that the existence of man is God's desire. He has a problem because he proved the existence of God using a series of theorems. He proved that thought is the essence of thinking. At that time the revolution supports the new idea of ​​"I think myself". It gives independent thinking and free will to human institutions, leading the age of enlightenment. For Descartes, thought proves that our existence is a conscious entity. By solving the survival problem, the thinkers of the 18th and 19th centuries established mathematical and scientific identity. Equivalent thoughts and consciousness do not satisfy thinking thoughts. Beyond the era of reason, we continue to doubt our existence The idea of ​​existence of God knows that everyone has one thing, God exists. Everyone agrees with the existence of God, but philosophers like Anselm still try to prove the existence of God. In Prosolgium 's article, Anselm tried to prove the existence of God to Ganillo by giving two ways. The purpose of the dialogue is to prove that it is impossible to accept the existence of God and it is impossible to believe in the existence of God. Proof of Anselm is that God exists. so

When we travel, the sinfulness and sacred comedy of sinners often come to a place that makes us feel strange. We were suddenly encountering abnormalities, looking forward to seeing what is direct and acceptable. Just like our self as a self tester encounters the inner devil, writer Dante also began walking his inferno. Dante explained his universe with a god comedy - in material, political and spiritual words. He also asked the reader to see his own view on the composition of sin. Avoid the pain of hell. The famous Italian poet Dante Alighieri writes about the physical depiction of hell and the punishment of all sinners against their sins. The comedy of God records the journey of Dante from the depth of hell to the glory of heaven, but it contains a deeper meaning. Through his motif, interaction with sinners, and other literary works and hell combinations, Dante reveals the true meaning of hell. "Inferno's Kant 18's Dante Alighieri's iterative theme, Marcel Proust once said that Rao us ..." A trip to explore wisdom through wild is happening at The Inferno of Dante Alighieri. Inferno is the first part of a trilogy called epic, god comedy. Inferno talks about the narrator Divine Dandy Alteieri's "Divine Comedy" is said to be the greatest epic in history. The first part of the three parts told the story at the beginning of the pilgrim Dante's character: hell. Inferno explained about the journey to Dante's hell, and the pain he encountered in the middle and many magical creatures. During his trip, Dante showed various emotions and behaviors, but the feelings that put together the whole poem is fear. Paper Presentation: In Dante's Inferno, the first part of Divine Comedy, Dante has developed many themes in the adventure of travelers. Inferno is a work Dante uses to express the theme of sacred justice of his god. Prove the righteousness of God's God by punishing the sinner the traveler encounters. Inferno is the first part of Dante Alighieri's epic trilogy "Divine Comedy". Poetry Dante has developed many themes in adventure from religious politics to his traveler. Inferno is the work Dante uses to express his view on God's righteousness. This is a terrible story, we can read like the character like a character who is playing virtual reality game from the security of the armchair. essay.com/The Inferno is a work by Dante on the theme of divine justice of God. Prove justice of God's divine by punishing sinners encountered by travelers Inferno is a work Dante uses to express the theme of sacred justice of his god. Prove justice of God's divine by punishing sinners encountered by travelers

Descartes believes knowledge comes from thought. This is an obvious fact that can be obtained through personal reflection. While seeking true knowledge, Descartes wrote his six meditations. In these meditations, Descartes will try to build a solid foundation that can build all knowledge. In the first meditation, Descartes began to develop this foundation with suspicion. He doubts all earlier ideas, including "not entirely certain but undoubtedly (and what seems like obvious mistakes)". (Descartes, p. 75, 3) If Descartes removes all convictions suspected of being in doubt, The contemplation of Rene Descartes' first philosophy is considered to be one of the most important works of modern philosophy. John Rock, Immanuel Kant, and numerous other philosophers have shown most of the reaction to Descartes. However, there is a serious doubt about the main argument of this paper. In opposing opinion and correspondence, philosopher Antoine Arnauld raised the question whether Descartes made circular reasoning. In Rene Descartes, the first philosophy of meditation, Descartes uses a wax test to try to prove that things exist in this world. In this article we will explain how we judge the existence of things and what can be perceived by wax. As Rene de Carte began to explain about wax, he can prove to us the changes that will occur in his experiment. "Let's take a look at this wax, for example, I just got out of the cell and did not lose all honey." In the first meditation Descartes thought of the first philosophy, he began to doubt the four beliefs. These beliefs are as follows. The existence of a person's own body, the existence of other bodies / things, mathematical knowledge, and God. Each of these beliefs is based on extreme allegations. Through the fundamental process, Descartes then ascertains whether each belief is there. The first thing that Descartes thought was to judge whether the body was there. He said that some of the facts we currently have will be realized through our senses. But our sense sometimes causes us to misunderstand us wrong conclusions about specific things and situations. In order to prove that sensation is misleading, Descartes leads the reader to "dream arguments". He explained what she might feel when she was dreaming. Interpretation and abstract of Essay.com/ Descartes 'first philosophical considerations' first and second considerations Descartes 'First Meditation and Interpretation and Summary of Descartes' First Meditation and Second Meditation in "First Philosophical Meditation"

Evaluation of the civil disobedience approach of Dworkin and Habermas The following article attempts to evaluate the perception of civic disobedience by Dworkin and Habermas. The two major documents mentioned are papers on Dworkin's "Civil Disobedience and Nuclear Protest". And Habermas' paper "Civil disobedience: a trial for a democratic constitutional state". An overview of the Dworkin and Habermas methods is outlined and further discussion focuses on the introspective evaluation of these methods. Disobedience of citizens may be regarded as "personal rights violating the law on moral obligation" in some cases. In 1968 Dworkin offered three possible results on the handling of civil disobedience. First, citizens do not obey at least two aspects, legal and moral. Second, social norms stipulate that all laws apply equally to all people, citizens, foreigners and illegal foreigners in the US sovereign state. Third, the experience of the Vietnam War related to Dworkin has increased moral condemnation caused by political interference in foreign countries. Evaluation of the civil disobedience approach of Dworkin and Habermas The following article attempts to evaluate the perception of civic disobedience by Dworkin and Habermas. The two major documents mentioned are papers on Dworkin's "Civil Disobedience and Nuclear Protest". And Habermas' paper "Civil disobedience: a trial for a democratic constitutional state". An overview of the Dworkin and Habermas methods is outlined and further discussion focuses on the introspective evaluation of these methods. Civil disobedience is an illegal act in the public place, it will not lead to loss of life or property damage. The purpose of civil disobedience is political change. John Rawls, Jurgen Habermas, Richard Rorty, Sheldon Wolin distinguish citizens from disobedience, but citizens emphasize not following the "citizen" aspect of "disobedience". This article raises doubt about the aspect of "disobedience" of citizen's disobedience, and states as follows. (1) How often does an individual instigate citizen's disobedience in a democratic country? And (2) When is ethical justification for violations of the law? This article clarifies the Kant society that explains the relationship between morality, authority and moral authoritarianism and analyzes these concepts according to US law. Disobey intentionally refuses to comply with regulations and laws. Disobedience may include domestic or religious laws and principles. Disobedience is moral or immoral and is determined according to the circumstances. Disobedience of citizens is an intentional act including illegal official acts that will not cause loss of life or property damage. Suicide and eradication of hunger are an example of civil disobedience, which can only be achieved in public and political careers. Because of the loss of human life, public suicide is not civil disobedience. If the legal beliefs or religious beliefs of a country are considered problematic, inappropriate or inappropriate for a person, that person's moral conscience will be activated. The lack of confidence in the government leads to a moral debate on malignant countries in the private and public sectors

Georges Didi-Huberman is indispensable for traditional art history research methods. Didi - Huberman, in particular the "spontaneous philosophy that believes in the knowledge base in the context of Kant, or the history of art to the superiority of what he calls." Art historians argue that they take time to look at images , They can not be described as a forensic process, in the process, they understand artists and purpose, although they are in order of better decoding, deconstructing, analyzing art works. Or express. 0 minutes 22 seconds In recent years, human trafficking and destruction of art has approached the cause of antique art goods, causing a public interest at 0:22 am. Work and paralysis of agent Hammer Beat Museum in Iraq, Syria The moon scenery and face image of Peru is only in Cambodia, sky picture decimated Buddhist sculpture is not only the collapse of the community, Lost the frame on the wall, ruins lost their accomplishments at the temple in South Asia and Central and South America. We face a tough problem. How do you protect our legacy from theft, illegal sale, destruction? The face is a person's public self-image. A face is a strategy to use to protect and protect your image and others' self image. For example, when feeling threatened by our public self-image, we may leave this situation or adopt facial protection strategies. In this article, I will explain three ways to check the contention style. The trend law focuses on personalized conflict behavior. Here, people learn conflict behavior through social processes and personal character traits. For example, outgoing people tend to use compliance and evasion styles, but outgoing conflict styles may prefer to use dominant competing styles. Because members of a specific culture systematically display specific functions, these functions can be expanded to a cultural level Looking at what you see, seeing the disappearance of buildings and screaming pictures of dead children: Is it difficult to avoid in the face of the consequences of bloodshed images of war and conflict? As a file - - "I do not want to see" The witness and the answer leading to war with the witness issued the first "pain of others", she explained the ability of the photograph, and in 2003 Susan Sontag is usually " Sharing experiences. "In what time can tens of millions of news sharing with screen touch, what impact do the pictures of today have on viewers? Aylan Kurdi After a picture of an incredible tragedy was released, a few years ago, I wrote an article entitled "Photo as a document". In this article, I owe some of the things I said.

It is estimated worldwide that millions of animals are raised and killed each year from drugs to floor cleaners and creams. The nine reasons why misuse, mishandling, and atrocity are using biological instruments as laboratory equipment on World Animal Day (April 24) are as follows. In the UK, the use of rats in monkeys, dogs, rats and experiments is legal - although they are regulated Since we differ from other species in terms of physiology, biochemistry, metabolism etc, it is difficult to obtain results from animal experiments and apply them reliably to humans. Even if you judge your ideas in any way it is a mistake to make lonely lives in the laboratory cage and let them experiment with bad pain. Animal experiments on cosmetics and cosmetics have been banned in the UK for a long time As of March 2013, the EU as a whole prohibited the sale of cosmetics tested for animal ingredients - a big step forward. Unfortunately, in some countries such as China, all companies selling cosmetics need to pay for movable products. This means that some companies that were not cruel for years have begun to test their animals to turn their ethical policy back into the favorable market. Non-animal research methods such as human-based trace dosing, in vitro technology, human patient simulator, computer modeling, etc. can also be used Rat - with the mouse, is the most commonly used animal in the experiment - it is a very intelligent and social animal It lies between good science and bad science - between methods directly related to humans and methods not directly related to humans. It is time to switch to test methods other than humanized, effective and contemporary animals that do not cause animal suffering and give hope for effective medical care. Dr. Vernon Coleman has identified eight moral dilemmas to resolve when countering the value of animal experiments, why animal experiments must be stopped at the 1991 Animal Exhibition Exhibition. Firm response before and after. The book he also identified eight major medical / scientific arguments about animal experiments and provided a convincing and fully documented argument on objections. The jury believes that the biological systems of non-human and human animals are different. They react not only to the chemical being tested but also to common foods. It is a strong argument that these results can not be reasonably inferred from one to the other, and Hans Reusch 's important work in 1982 "Naked Empress" or Great Medical Fraud (Great Medical Fraud (Page 13) Animal pain is a legitimate problem in the UK, but the world is full of problems, human problems must be done first! It sounds nice, but all animals asked me to wear animal fur and leather and stop eating meat. As a vegetarian wearing synthetic materials, I have no reason not to deal with human problems. But does the fact that we can choose to give up on meat for moral reasons point to a significant moral difference between animals and humans? As Kant pointed out, humans are the only moral animals and the only animal that can accept even the concept of "right". For those who can answer it, what's wrong with maintaining ethical considerations? Here, A.M.C. You can enter: moral status of mental retardation, crazy, infant and Alzheimer's patients

About Bertrand Russell Bertrand Russell is one of the best thinkers of the 20th century. His mathematical logic work laid the foundation for most of modern mathematics; his political thought had influenced his time and later; his philosophy was complex and very intelligent. He is considered one of the most important two or three logic scholars of the 20th century. Throughout his life, he was a well-known figure and became very respected - indeed, since he died in 1970 at the age of 97, in his life he got his reputation very emotional I saw growing to a large proportion. Bertrand Russell - British philosopher, mathematician, and Bertrand Russell (1872-1970, the third generation Russell Earl Russell Earl) to support the scientific method of Kant, knowledge is believed to be the "belief that consistent with the fact." It was. He argues that it is not enough to believe that there is no evidence, and instead we should check whether there are accurate and agreed supporting facts and who agrees (1926). John Dewey - John Dewey (1859-1952) is an American philosopher and educational reformer. He is seen as the founder of experiential education and combines contemplation and actions to achieve new experience and knowledge. In 1910, he wrote a book on "How to think" for teachers. There, he described critical thinking as introspective thinking and transferred thought beyond meditation. Dewey defines and uses the term reflexive thinking as follows. Bertrand Russell, Bertrand Arthur William Russell, Viscount of Third Earl of Kingston Russell Russell, Amberley and Ardsalla, born May 18, 1972, Trek, Monmouthshire, Wales, died February 2, 1970, Penrhyndeudraeth, Merioneth), British philosopher, logicologist and social reformer, founder of the analysis movement in British and American philosophy, and the 1950 Nobel Prize for literature award. Russell 's contribution to logic, epistemology and mathematical philosophy has made him one of the most important figures of philosophers of the 20th century. But for the general public, he is best known for peace and sustenance for popular writers for social, political and moral subjects. In the long-term, productive, and often turbulent life, he published more than 70 books and about 2,000 articles, married four times, participated in countless public disputes, and It was respected and abused by the same standards all over the world.

Another View of Moral Ethics Moral theory thinks the foundation of morality is the development of good character and virtue. If a person has virtue and there is no bad habit, that person is a good person. Several virtue theorists describe up to 100 benign features that will help make someone a good person. Since benign personality develops in adolescence, moral theory places particular emphasis on moral education, so adults are responsible for allowing young people to virtue. In virtue ethics, there are different opinions about the exact nature and meaning of virtue, and some theorists get inspiration from Plato and other ancient people for their theory. Modern virtue ethics is a relatively young movement in modern academic circles. Therefore, it was investigated, marked and not classified within the scope of result - and - duty theory. Objective recognition theory thinks that human beings must observe the world in a sensation and develop principles through reasoning based on these observations (incomplete but within specific parameters) in order to correctly predict the future I will. This indicates whether the prediction is in natural science, humanities, or moral sectors. Generalization and interpretation of ethical theory: resultism, morality, moral ethics and objectiveists ethical self-doctrine Morality is now widely recognized as an alternative to Kant and the theory of result ethics. However, moral philosophers were late to incorporate ethics into the subject of applied ethics. Furthermore, environmental virtue ethics is an undeveloped field of environmental ethics. Environmental ethics frequently uses moral evaluation (respect, consideration, nature love, etc.) and leads the attraction of role models (Henry Thoreau, Aldreauponto, Rachel Carson etc), but environmental ethics is completely understood Not. Modern virtue ethics research From the viewpoint of some scholars, virtue is considered highly likely to apply to the public sector. Aristotle first adopted virtue ethics (Lawton 1998). Moral ethics does not doubt the role of duty of moral judgment in the general moral order, even though it doubts the outcome of action. Ethics precedes the development of the moral qualities, motivations and intentions of each person (Trevino & Nelson 2010). - Many of us have role models in our lives Most people's role models are athletes and movie stars, but for me there are more examples. For me, the role model is not a selfish and greedy person but a person who positively influences someone in my life. They help shape someone's personality and identity. They are people who can ask for advice in difficult situations and know that they will give these words of wisdom.

The death penalty was a question worthy of being debated for decades. In terms of gaining life, human thinking often ignores equal value relationships. Attention shifts from the life of the victim to the life of the murderer. Emanuel Kant believes that ethical laws can be applied as well, and if someone breaks the law, we should ensure that the law applies to everyone. Otherwise, there is no such thing as morality. Without morality, life is meaningless. We are morally strong and should be able to kill criminals to prove that the law is more important than human life. There are two ways of viewing the death penalty. Most people think that the death penalty is effective. But some people think this is murder. Canada is overbearing and it has reached the point that the country can not afford criminals in prisons. That's why Canada needs to eliminate horrible murderers. If a criminal robs a person's life, that cost becomes the person's own life. Perhaps the execution of the death penalty is murder, but how does society know that it may be the next death sentence? When discussing the death penalty, the death penalty can keep many positions. In Jonathan Glover 's "Execution" article, he believes that a person may have three views on the death penalty. Glover recognizes that statistical and intuitive evidence can not prove the benefits of the death penalty, but he believes that society is useful, so he can be regarded as a Utilitarian. It will appear many times in the future. Some citizens think that the death penalty is morally wrong, but in today's society it is necessary for various reasons. Society must keep safety from the atrocities of murder and rapists, deprive of their lives, and to demonstrate their roles and abilities in our society. Most offenders did not consider the results of their actions. If you are going to commit a crime, let's meet another criminal Death penalty, two words many people are worried about. These two words are thought to be "open your eyes" by criminals. Vocabulary of controversial social thought. What is the death penalty? The death penalty refers to the death penalty. In other words, anyone who is convicted of murder or a certain heinous crime will be sentenced to death. But do you really need a death sentence? Will the death penalty prevent society from committing "suicide"? Everyone has the right to live and you have the right to choose your own way of living. He has the right to decide what he wants to do. No one has the right to decide whether he or she should die. The ideology of the death penalty is very inhumane. Because he caused a "controversial" crime, the idea of ​​taking people away is not just civilized. Even if he or she does something unacceptable to his or her society, people have the right to live.

The success and failure of Mussolini's domestic policy in Italy between 1922 and 1939 is similar to that of Hitler, and the main goal of Mussolini is the Italian nation with a strong identity and a strong military force in Europe It was to establish. Since becoming the prime minister of the coalition government on October 29, 1922, he lacks certain organizational strength. It is not yet clear what Mussolini wants to do. The period of Italy from 1922 to 1939 was Mussolini's dictatorship system. As a dictator, Mussolini fundamentally changed the government's policy of trying to improve welfare and economic stability and strengthened his power by influencing public opinion. Some of his policies were successful and others failed, but when Mussolini began working with Hitler, he lost its popularity and could not maintain power over a long period of time. Mussolini's domestic policy is divided into two areas: economic policy and social policy. Therefore, this white paper will evaluate the success of these policies and Mussolini's success in achieving these policies. Looking at Mussolini's domestic policy, we can speculate that his failure is much greater than his success. There are several reasons for this. Mussolini wanted to blindly build a dictatorship but did not even consider impossible as he did not have enough resources and territory to do so. He did not know much about economics, and he made some gross mistakes by trying to reform the Italian economy. His social policy was not comprehensive and workers and farmers were not fully satisfied but when Mussolini looked at Hitler's foreign policy, people completely lost their trust from him and Mussolini lost power It was. Benito Mussolini was born in Predappio, Italy, held power from 1922 to 1943, led the Italian government and became the first fascist dictator in Europe in the 20th century. Mussolini dreamed of building an empire and started some invasions. However, after his army was severely hit by the Second World War (1939-1945), he was abolished and executed. Mussolini was very intelligent, he developed his own political ideology and studied philosophers like Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) who gained a reputation as a talented journalist. In 1919 he founded Fasci di Combattimento (fascist political organization) and in 1921 won parliamentary seats. Mussolini was very attractive, established a position as a winner of believers, a revolutionary nationalist, and a person who can solve Italian economic and political crises. In 1922 he became the prime minister of Italy, and by the mid-1920s he established a position as a dictator.

The environment, research and reverence are the nature of human beings that cast doubt on our environment. We live on a planet in a galaxy composed of multiple galaxies; it is natural that we question questions in our space in the universe. When questioning our world and how it works it is natural that you wonder why it is. Why do we exist? What is our aim, what happens when we die? Science tries to answer our questions, but faith in religion has produced satisfying answers that place greater emphasis on the soul. In Kenya, almost all religions in the world are like African religion, Islam, Christianity, Judaism, Jainism, Buddhism, Hinduism, Judaism and Sikhism. Most of these religions are limited to people in certain parts of the world, such as Hinduism - India, Judaism - Israel, Taoism - China, but Christianity, African Religion and Muslims have believers I will. Kenyans began here and this article focuses on these issues. African religion is a religion practiced by all indigenous peoples in Africa. In fact, many indigenous Africans are still practicing it. As Magesa (1977) pointed out, many philosophers, theologians, and relatively religious students still consider it to be "extreme" or "ethnic", so here I used the present. In this respect, these people still relate religion to magic and fetishism. Jainism is a godly religion centered on asceticism and stupidity and nonviolence. Jansenism is a division of Catholic thought, emphasizing the original sin, the fall of mankind, the necessity and destiny of God's grace. It was named after Cornelius Otto Janssen. Judaism is a monotheistic religion of Abraham derived from ancient Hebrew. Kantoism is the philosophy of German philosopher Immanuel Kant, born in Königsberg, Germany (now Kaliningrad in Russia). The term cantianism or cantism can refer to a contemporary position in spiritual philosophy, epistemology, and ethics. Cartesianism is an extension of "myths" from Casshena Theon, "a god at a time". Kierkegaardianism is a set of philosophical, theological and psychological positions based on the works of Denmark's philosopher Soren Kilkegau in the 19th century. Kierkegaard's work focuses on struggle to become a true individual with existing individuals

Nietzsche wrote as follows: "My objection to the whole sociology of Britain and France is that it only knows the form of the collapse from experience and sins It is to accept the instinct that collapses as a sociological value without sociological value Normalization of judgment The decline of life, the decline of organization's power, ie rifts, subordination, and all of these are formulated as ideals of contemporary sociology (P. 541) The European culture of Nietzsche's literature experienced a general decline of vitality, which was reflected in Christianity (platonism) and anarchism or nihilism. Nietzsche's philosophy is innovative and revolutionary, but it has been backed by many predecessors. During Basel, Nietzsche provided a lecture on the philosophy of the previous Plato philosopher for many years, and the text of this series of lectures was described as "lost touch" in his development of thought. In the concept of power will, same eternity return, superman, science of homosexuality, self-conquest, accept rough, anonymous expressions, accept Heraclitus which appeared before the previous specific Plato, especially Plato. "The former Socratic thinker Heraclitus is known for refusing the permanent and eternal principle of the universe, and the concept of" change "and a changing hug. Nietzsche appreciates his symbol of the world as a "child's game" characterized by unethical spontaneity and lack of clear rules. Aristotle, Kantian, Jewish - Like the Christian ideals, Platonic good life was completely broken by Friedrich Nietzsche's hand. Surzrenant said Nietzsche declared "God is dead", in particular the god of Christianity. "This allows us to live a more meaningful and fulfilling life." Nietzsche used himself as a "moralist." The death of God - a metaphor for the loss of religious and metaphysical authority in human behavior - expresses what he calls "revaluation of value". Criticism of his traditional moral values ​​combines his so-called denial of life, self-control, democracy and compassionate value ("morality of slavery") with the value affirmed in life. 113 Villa insists that Arendt is criticizing the theory of purpose of the Nietzsche era through a conscious aesthetic act, Plato's moral tradition and is highly convincingly claimed. According to Arendt's subsequent work, Vera further insisted that "her and Nietzsche are one of the people who celebrated the freedom of non-sovereign and eccentric behavior that transcended good and evil." See 287. The cottage's position Arendt left Nietzsche in Kant's aesthetics, of course it is promising insight. The real problem that the villa has not solved is because I use the explanation that Alerent is not a description of Kant's moral judgment, it is not only a phenomenon of beauty. As a result, Arendt opposed Kant and Nietzsche's moral philosophy. 114 Kampofski, Arendt, Augustine and New Beginning, 61

For example, cotton gin produces more cotton than manual. The idea of ​​the assembly line allows for higher productivity, thereby making weapons faster. These weapons take less time to assemble, less time consuming and fewer staff. These technically advanced weapons are much more powerful than before. New technology allows better and faster communication among people without the need to rely on slow communication. A steamship was built and spread to these developed countries along with other technological innovations. The 18 th century was called era of enlightenment or era of reason. Historians do not necessarily truncate the historical period strictly according to the date, the part known as the 18th century reason era usually refers to the period from 1715 to 1789. 1715 is the last year of Queen Anne's reign, the end of the Spanish throne inheritance war. 1789 was the beginning of the French Revolution. In addition to the date, the age of reason is an extraordinary era of intellectual infertility. The scientific revolution that began about a century ago changed people's perception of the problem not only in the field of science but also in the general field of public relations. The principle behind the era of reason is that by using human intelligence it is possible to make a reasonable decision about how people and the country do business. The enlightenment of French literature in the era of intelligent era and rationalism is the period after the classical era of France in the 1700s. During this time philosophers have focused on rationality as the best way to learn. It explores education, law philosophy and political issues. It attacks tyranny, social injustice, superstition, and ignorance. In this time, progress has been made in the fields of anatomy, astronomy, chemistry, mathematics and physics. - French Neoclassicalism In the 17th century, the era of the King Louis XIV, we saw the era of neoclassical ideals, the three largest masters of France, Corneille, Racine and Molière. With the decline of the religious play in the middle of the 16th century, French play slowly developed. The French Renaissance began in 1630 and ended in 1700 Many critical thinkers believed that religion and reason are hostile in the age of enlightenment in the 17th and 18th centuries. For them, the Middle Ages or the "era of faith" is therefore the opposite of the era of reason. Kant and Voltaire were attacking the Middle Ages as an era of religious decline, and Jimbo in the "History of the decline and decline of the Roman Empire" expressed their contempt for "garbage in the dark ages". But like Petrarch, he saw himself at the cutting edge of the "new era" and criticized it for centuries before his own time, as was the enlightenment writer .

The public life of political public servants is characterized by other duties and obligations, not private life. There is also contradiction between human public duties and private obligations. The focus of this white paper is to test whether this difference in responsibility is regarded as the impact of various forms of obligation. You can talk about a particular form of political obligation in the same way Kant distinguishes moral and legal obligations. Do you agree that the theoretical political obligation requires liberal democracy? At first glance, the answer seems to depend on a confirmed consent token. It is clear that if registration is approved by voting, society must be democratic in order to have political obligations to citizens. On the other hand, if consent is represented only by residence, freedom of rights and freedom - freedom of speech, democracy etc. - seems to be irrelevant to consent and political obligation issues. Therefore, this article will first briefly introduce the issue of political obligation. Next, the second part looks at the conceptual problems posed by political obligations, including its implications for political obligations. The third part focuses on skepticism, paying special attention to anarchists who deny political obligations but do not want to abolish the state, which is called philosophy. In Part 4, we survey the main competitors in various political obligation theories currently being provided, summarize the thesis in Part 5, and briefly discuss the recent pluralism or "multi-principle" method proposal To do. The immediate problem arising from this concept of political obligation is whether "politics" is a suitable transformationist. If the obligation is to comply with the law, why is not it called a legal obligation if other conditions remain the same? Or, Bhikhu Parekh (1993, p.240), our obligation to comply with the law is actually a matter of citizen's obligation, "respect and protect civic authorities' legal obligation" I do not conclude that there is. The obligation is "not a political obligation," follow the law enacted by the administration "? Parek believes that "politics" is a wider term and that those with real political obligations will bear her politics, not following their laws. Raz 2006, p. 1004) Such people have an active obligation to ensure safety and take measures to promote their own interests.

Dante's Inferno: Canto V's close-up reading Dante Alighieri shows his vivid and awakening depth of hell with his first book of divine hell. Dante "visits" and observes the state of the soul of the saint who is always assigned to hell, so we allow readers to think about the state of their soul. Any cant written in Inferno provides a good explanation of hell pain and justice, but Canto V provides a keen view of the distribution of punishments based on crime. Dante's Inferno's Cant V Dante's Inferno, as part of God's comedy, Kant V introduced torture of hell on lap two. Here, Minos tells mind that they will wrap their tails around themselves. The second inner ring has desires and people who commit crimes. They were punished by infinite storms in the dark, and the storms hit them. Hell is not only a geographical place but also a representative of the possibility of evil and evil of all human souls. Dante's Inferno: Canto V's close-up reading Dante Alighieri shows his vivid and awakening depth of hell with his first book of divine hell. Dante "visits" and observes the state of the soul of the saint who is always assigned to hell, so we allow readers to think about the state of their soul. Any cant written in Inferno provides a good explanation of hell pain and justice, but Canto V provides a keen view of the distribution of punishments based on crime. Dante's Divine Comedy is one of the most famous and influential literary works in history, Hell in Divine Comedy, and Dante's supervision through Hell Guide is most famous. This summer I will study Dante 's Inferno and plan to move to other parts of this story next year. Like last week, I was vacant in the summer list, I would like to fill it with the novels of the 1980s and raise the theme of literature in July. Since 1980 's, I asked members of the reading book group' Great Books About Great Books' to listen to my favorite novel. I got a lot of wonderful advice, but the title, a wonderful and completely unique book mentioned by many readers made me very excited.

Voltaire's Candide allows you to pass the adventures of two continents, several countries, and many objectionable characters. The main character, Candid, became the recipient of fear that everyone in the 18th century was facing. But Candid is always with the patient. Two of them are Pangloss and Martin. On the same side, both are manifestations of different philosophies of the time: Pangloss is a proponent of optimism and Martin is a supporter of pessimism. Each of these two travelers is never with Candide until the end, but draws him to draw the world in one of the two philosophies. Through the story, there is a clear tide and flow ... Read more But he is still optimistic about the world. I believe that without Cunegonde, Candide is not so happy to accept optimism. His affection for her was very strong, so Kant was naively mad at the fear of the world. Wandering by Candid in many aspects of South America has become the peak of an optimistic world view. When Candido and Cacampo fell to El Dorado, that peak came. Compared to contemporary cities in Europe, the city of Eldorado can be called utopia. Eldorado society and law, unlike Europeans, is based on the ideal of equality for everyone but this idea has been put into practice. Eldorado society has been said to be perfect in all respects. There is neither a court nor a prison, it is described as a complete society. For El Dorad's absurd and perfect society, El Dorado's idea can be regarded as a false hope for Candidate and optimism. In addition, it illustrates how impossible it is for Europeans to make social similar missions. Eldorado made this particularly clear. "We have been greedy to European countries so far, they are irresponsible to pebbles and mud in our land, and we will kill us the last person. Put your hands on those things "(Voltaire, Candide, 48) Voltaire is the author of the novel Candide, also known as "optimism". The novel "Voltaire" explains the optimistic view as illogical and absurd. In Candide, Voltaire respected the idea of ​​optimism. It was widely used by philosophers during enlightenment. In this story, Candid is a young man experienced a series of career and adventure experiencing adversity and adversity worldwide. - ... The article points out: "Leibniz does not care about the world he observes, but focuses on the world and his formulas can prove it." His logic is As Leibniz made impossible impossible, Leibniz ignored social problems and flaws that were so obvious in front of him. This is the first confrontation place between Leibniz and Voltaire. Voltaire has partially constructed Candide for entertainment purposes, mainly to satisfy the paradox of Leibniz's optimistic theory. Through his legendary process Voltaire juxtaposes the original, unexplored optimism of the character in the story of exaggerated real world pessimism and pessimistic adventure. From terrible war to illness, incitement and cheating, Voltaire did not miss bad things in "the best world". Leibniz thinks our world is a symbol of perfection. He believes that God is perfect as Earth is the concept of God and this perfect flaw must be maintained. But Voltaire further emphasized his sarcasm and chose to begin writing with these places only to deliberately ignore the inevitable evil of the "best world".

Moore Lorrie Moore's way of adjusting the concept of "method" A way to take a positive attitude in love and human relations. It depends strongly and unequivocally on the value and perception that our society holds about the concept of partnership between men and women. Moore relies on the authors' words, makes inevitable predictions, and formats the story in such a way that he or she orders the reader to specifically guide our view on the story. Through the use of cultural analysis, people will find ways and evidences to help Moore succeed in attaining what was previously listed. Those aspects that will be covered are the external and internal structure of the story, how it sets our view, and G. E. Moore (1992) argues Principia Ethica can not analyze "good". Mr. Moore insists that "good" is a simple concept like "yellow". Because it can not be divided into smaller concepts, they become equal to "yellow" together. Ochieng'-Odhiambo said that giving definitions and analysis is not the same as "tolerance". He agrees with Moore's view that he can neither define nor analyze it as "good", but he admits that it does not deny the criteria we can say to make things better. Moore believes that the proposition is made up of concepts. In order to get used to propositions, these elements and concepts must exist independently (for hypothesis a). Moore pointed out: "... we are approaching the essence of propositions and judgments.The propositions are not made up of words, they are not composed of ideas, but they are composed of concepts.They are It is that there may be something to do with the philosopher and they need to be something already to do something They are indifferent as to whether someone thinks about their nature.This is because, It is a unique relationship that may begin to stop when the target changes, but this concept is neither the cause nor the influence of this change. From scientific research to science fiction novel, this concept has been left behind. The invention of the device began in the mid-1990s, but Moore's Law began this discussion. The history of Moore's law goes back to 1965, when British founder Gordon Moore predicted that the number of parts on a single chip would double every two years. This promoted the idea of ​​miniaturizing the technology, and a big change in the industry was born. Soon the gadget is getting smaller and stronger The last important characteristic of Moor's meta ethics is the simplification of the normative concept. Like Sidgwick, Moses's principle of democracy thinks that there is only one basic normative concept, but I think that Moore is only two, like Ross. However, the conceptual reductionism that went from West-Jike to Ross, Broad, Ewing during this period is in sharp contrast to the many concepts many ethics allow today. First, Moore and his generation of the same generation regard the concept of "thinness" as the basis, not "fat" moral concepts such as "courage" or "generosity". Descriptive content will be less. They also understand the concept of simplification. They also did not recognize different kinds of values. For them, kindness is different from Kant 's people and other things, it is only a representation of the state of things.

One of the golden Greeks in April was drunk in the spring, drunk, singing and dancing fiercely She was already drunk with her joy and also booed her flower hive. It was poisoned this spring. One afternoon in April, you fall in love, my god. You fall in love, you are crying, you are embarrassed, but you are not admitting it You are drunk on the moon, your drunk is not subsisting. So I can see your shadow and all your belongings. The word "golden age" comes from Greek myths of the work and the Hesiod era, and it is part of a word that explains the era of the era after five periods (gold is one of the first golden people of humanity ). . People who lived in the first era were ruled by Cronos after the end of the first era was silver, then bronze, which was then a heroic era, and five years old was iron. The extension of the "Golden Age" represents the period of primitive peace, harmony, stability and prosperity. In this era peace and harmony is prevailing, and people do not need to support themselves because the earth provides abundant food. They live in a young and beautiful, very old age and finally die peacefully, and the spirit is still "guardian". Plato of Cratylus (397 e) shows the first race of the Golden Race In Greek mythology, Dick lives in the golden age of mankind. She was born to humans and was put on the ground to rule human race. The Golden Age is characterized by prosperity and peace, eternal spring, and humans will never know the old age. When Zeus completed the old prophecy and beat his father, it showed the beginning of the galaxy era, and this period was not so prospering at this time. Zeus introduced the four seasons, and humans no longer respect the gods as usual. Dick made a speech during the tournament and warned of the dangers of quitting his predecessor and said that even worse things had not yet happened. Then she jumped to the mountain and returned to mankind. When the times of bronze and iron arrived, when humans began fighting each other, Dick left the earth completely and then flew to the sky. During the century before Kant and Hume, the Greeks taught that "there is a law of beauty" and that the law must be learned. The most famous rule related to beauty is golden number (61803399) or golden ratio. This can be represented by the following graph (a + b is from a to b). The golden ratio was discovered by Greek philosophers and mathematicians Pythagoras and was discovered in many art works and nature. The number of gold is usually represented by the Greek letter 'Phi' or Φ, after Phidias (480-430 BC), Greek sculptors use it proportionately to many of its famous and beautiful sculptures did. Temple of Parthenon in Athens was built by ancient Greeks from 447 BC to 438 BC, and many people think that it is an application of golden ratio of design.

"Reading and writing skills in various subjects is very important for the choice of life in the future. What we need to learn that children deal with various kinds of texts is very unique education and dialogue at school is". He is a professor of educational science at the university 's new Blåsenhus campus and is in charge of research on reading and writing processes. Learning to read and write is not a matter of simply "cracking code". It's about being able to use it to read and write many topics and backgrounds "Even at a very young age it will lay the foundation for children's understanding and future participation.When adults enter texts with children, explain the contents in detail and explain," Caroline Liberg I say. From an international perspective, Swedish families do a very good job of providing young children with an exciting family environment to develop handwritten languages. In the next step, children learn to read, write and understand the abstract principles of written letters. This is the focus of today's school. "But as children acquire the basic skills of reading and writing new challenges arise, children will encounter lots of text, if not early, between 3rd and 4th graders. Because the information in the text is very dense, this might be a big shock, "Caroline Liberg said. Students usually deal with themselves at this stage and face many sentences without the teacher's true support. Since the 1980s, the trend in education was to allow children to manage themselves. "But dialogue and dialogue with others is very important to learning, there are different opinions depending on the content.The contrast effect is the foundation of all learning.The topic text also has different difficulties.For example, The text is well explained sex, other textbooks may be narrative, debate, etc, but students need to learn to meet all these textbooks in terms expressed in the learning requirements of each subject there is." "At Uppsala University, we received funds to set up research laboratories to study texts in mathematics and science fields, and finance on how students handle these texts.Caroline Liberg Maintenance COWEN: But does Plato like Socrates, too? As you read these conversations, Socrates seems to be full of public opinion. I tend to use Protagoras and Sophists more. You read a conversation like Meno. "Oh, learning has to be remembered." The argument you carefully learned about this conclusion seems stupid. COWEN: This is a philosopher's dislikes. But for our readers, what would it be like if I wanted to read all the conversations that you think would have and blame it for the bottom line of the bottom line? That is not the law, but the law of Socrates. What do you think? It is noteworthy that Plato wrote "dialogue", Aristotle wrote the paper. When a person reads Plato's conversation like Aristotle's thesis, people will not understand the conversation. Reading Plato just as we read Aristotle is one of the fates that we met in an English speaking community. Previous generations of British and American thinkers have read Plato as if they are reading Aristotle's thesis. Augustine, Aristotle, the traditional language landscape seen by logical positivists, in our understanding of "metaphysics" of "subjectivity" (Descartes, Kant) as "rationality as a way of understanding" Discussed. Deep connection In this traditional figure, the symbol represents a thing (theme), but it is also a concept or image symbol (frame) in the speaker's mind. A conceptual or psychological image is the manifestation of the speaker's heart and brain.

In Rene Descartes, the first philosophy of meditation, Descartes uses a wax test to try to prove that things exist in this world. In this article we will explain how we judge the existence of things and what can be perceived by wax. As Rene de Carte began to explain about wax, he can prove to us the changes that occur in his experiment. "Let's take a look at this wax, for example, I just got out of the cell and did not lose all honey." The contemplation of Rene Descartes' first philosophy is considered to be one of the most important works of modern philosophy. John Rock, Immanuel Kant, and numerous other philosophers have shown most of the reaction to Descartes. However, there is a serious doubt about the main argument of this paper. In opposing opinion and correspondence, philosopher Antoine Arnauld raised the question whether Descartes made circular reasoning. In Rene Descartes, the first philosophy of meditation, Descartes uses a wax test to try to prove that things exist in this world. In this article we will explain how we judge the existence of things and what can be perceived by wax. As Rene de Carte began to explain about wax, he can prove to us the changes that will occur in his experiment. "Let's take a look at this wax, for example, I just got out of the cell and did not lose all honey." In the first meditation Descartes thought of the first philosophy, he began to doubt the four beliefs. These beliefs are as follows. The existence of a person's own body, the existence of other bodies / things, mathematical knowledge, and God. Each of these beliefs is based on extreme allegations. Through the fundamental process, Descartes then ascertains whether each belief is there. The first thing that Descartes thought was to judge whether the body was there. He said that some of the facts we currently have will be realized through our senses. But our sense sometimes causes us to misunderstand us wrong conclusions about specific things and situations. In order to prove that sensation is misleading, Descartes leads the reader to "dream arguments". He explained what she might feel when she was dreaming. Interpretation and abstract of Essay.com/ Descartes 'first philosophical considerations' first and second considerations Descartes 'First Meditation and Interpretation and Summary of Descartes' First Meditation and Second Meditation in "First Philosophical Meditation"

"In the country of Denmark, something has decayed" (1.4.98), but various infections can lead to major disputes. Not only are each character in the play suffering from their inner trials, but each of these issues together form Danish rot. Throughout the game, each character learns to cope with his own internal battle, and each conflict combines with other conflicts to create a single complex problem. Each problem is associated with one another to form an intertwined network, eventually seven key figures will disappear. Since the word "nature" already has the concept of law and the latter has the concept of the necessity of all decisions belonging to existing things, why natural science must derive the legitimacy of the title It is easy to understand. It is a pure part. (MAdN 4: 468-9) Of course it is difficult to understand how Kant wants to fulfill the above restrictions in establishing specific legal knowledge; it is difficult to understand this knowledge partly Can be experimentally and partially empirically? Friedman proposed an explanation of Kant's attempt to build knowledge using this law of motion with this "special mixed state" ( 1992a, 174). But I will neither explain nor evaluate Kant's attempt here. Human nature is like this. From this, we can see that it is the law of human nature that people with free willingness can attempt to rebel freely. Of course, one must be prepared to experience the result of his "disobedience". If people want to prosper, he should not ignore natural law. In a sense, it can be said that the effect of human nature depends on the will of that person. The reasons reveal the laws of nature and humans can choose to try to infringe it. Moral problems are de facto problems, moral standards are based on nature's facts. In order to create a framework of ethical standards, only ethical standards can be freely observed or avoided. To gain this freedom, everyone must be protected from the invasion of others. What is needed is a social structure that gives everyone the moral space he has freedom of movement - natural rights define this moral space

"If the devil goes away from me, I am anxious that my angel will escape." Rainer Maria Rilke wrote this article to explain the human nature. He stated his view on human behavior and people's way of thinking. Without evil, people do not know exactly what is good. Everyone has qualities of right and wrong. It is balanced and it is stable for everyone. In the absence of a person, humans will not be able to distinguish or understand whether their behavior is correct or wrong. It is not evil. Without evil there is no good way to exist. They complement each other, there is no one, you can not have another one. Unfortunately, evil always seems to outweigh that profit. This is reflected in various literary era of history. There are various ways to show good and evil. When someone is kind or considerate, it can be beautiful. - Hippo Augustine (354-430) is one of the most influential thinkers in Christianity. He has contributed many ideas and ideas to Christian theology. One of his most important contributions is the concept of "original sin" and his concept of "evil". These concepts have evolved over the years. Augustine painted their evolution in his 13 autobiographies he wrote in his 40s. In most of the Western intellectual history, studies of evil are reserved for theology. From Augustine and Aquinas to Luther and Calvin, Christian thinkers are crazy about "evil problems", how good a god in our world can have bad things. When Immanuel Kant introduces the concept of extreme evil that exists outside the bounds of reason and will, the eternal problems of evil are released from the exclusive grasp of the church. Perhaps because of its mixed religious and secular qualities, our evil concept creates almost mysterious power in society's impulse to create order from chaos and despair It was. As Susan Neyman wrote in his groundbreaking research, "evil in modern thinking", "The problem of evil can be expressed in terms of theological or secular terms, but basically it is It is understandability of the whole world.

The scientific revolution had a great impact on the enlightenment of the 17th and 18th centuries. The greatest contribution of the scientific revolution to the Enlightenment was to cast doubt on the concept of Christian doctrine through logic. This is beyond speculation that some people act personally among friends and may reach a level beyond the boundaries of any country. The Gutenberg's 15th century printing press made it possible for these great thinkers to spread their theory to those who did not have enormous wealth. God was born and prospered primarily in Europe and North America during the 17th and 18th century Enlightenment Period (please see the God of religious tolerance for details). Many American founder believe themselves as deity, or believe that elements of deity are part of their personal moral philosophy. Examples include Thomas Paine, Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin, George Washington and others. In addition to understanding our own moral lens, God also provides a useful window for historical ideas behind the establishment of our country. Okay, men and girls, ready to enlightenment In this lesson I will introduce enlightenment. what is that? Enlightenment, sometimes called the era of enlightenment, was an intellectual movement from the late 17th century to the early 18th century, emphasizing reasons, individualism, and skepticism. Enlightenment challenged the traditional religious view. Because that was such a wide movement, enlightenment did not have an accurate start date. It did not pop up, but it gradually developed. Most historians came to the beginning of enlightenment from the mid 17th century to the beginning of the 18th century. The work of intellectuals like Rene Descartes, Barus Spinoza, Isaac Newton is particularly important for the creation of enlightenment. Many critical thinkers believed that religion and reason are hostile in the age of enlightenment in the 17th and 18th centuries. For them, the Middle Ages or the "era of faith" is therefore the opposite of the era of reason. Kant and Voltaire were attacking the Middle Ages as an era of religious decline, and Jimbo in the "History of the decline and decline of the Roman Empire" expressed their contempt for "garbage in the dark ages". But like Petrarch, he saw himself at the cutting edge of the "new era" and criticized it for centuries before his own time, as was the enlightenment writer .

In his essay "Evil and Almighty", McGee has built a view on the possibility of the existence of God with the characteristics of Lord religion, namely Christianity, Islam and Judaism. These features include that God is omnipotent, that you can stop evil with omnipotent tenderness, want to destroy evil, or be completely kind. Mackie systematically completed his logical response to the logical thinking process and to all possible types of criticism and alternative solutions. Summary: As you all know, J. L. Mackie is famous for having no objective value. I would like to investigate Mackie's explanation of what objective value really is, then consider his argument against those subjects and try to understand one of them. Specifically, I would like to see if his argument applies to Kant's objective value. Therefore, this conversation is both Kant's explanation and McKee's explanation (at least when I understood them). McKee believes that objective value (if any) has a strange causal relationship. Specifically, these entities have the ability to make them conscious of their motivation (whatever their meaning, they follow their recommendations). Does Kant believe that objectively valuable entities have such power? Is this power strange in metaphysics? J. L. Mackie defends moral skepticism in three specific arguments. His initial argument came from cultural relativism. McGee saw the problem that what we call objective moral belief seems not to form our culture. Rather, our culture seems to form our specific moral beliefs like monogamous. Therefore, moral subjectivity is the most rational explanation of moral beliefs to imitate our culture. His second argument against moral realism is that there is something strange or counterintuitive in the description of objective moral fields someone might give. There are three differences in this discussion. First, there are metaphysical questions, or questions based on odd states claimed by realists. For McGee, the wonder of this field is arguments against it. Secondly, there is a relationship problem as it is not clear how this field relates to natural objects and human behavior.

"In the most serious occupation, love is always hindered, sometimes even great ideas will get confused." - Schopenhauer1 All of us can agree with this sentence, but the real question is how to be a lover Do you choose and choose? Schopenhauer will argue that making decisions about the ultimate lover is only a biological thing. I believe that he defines what he calls the will of life to be "the inherent motive of human inner survival and reproductive." This is what the old world philosophers thought. Plato stated that we completed ourselves and wanted love to be perfect. Arthur Schopenhauer said that we prefer to deceive nature and deceive our children. Bertrand Russell said he likes loneliness. Sometimes, we think that you like to see if it comes back to us. It will examine our position in a world like an emotional sonar. Yes, I can be loved. I belong here. Online dating is like a million shots that jump out and bounce back, and some people come back to us. For a person floating alone in the sky, there is no signal, only silence To Schopenhauer, Nietzsche often believes that the best people should cultivate a cruel taste. Schopenhauer was always the first love for Nietzsche's philosophy, but in his earlier work "The Birth of Tragedy" he was urging a kind of mercy - the best virtue of Schopenhauer - but the joy of life Destruction should not be allowed. I believe that Schopenhauer has achieved sympathy for other living things "away from will" - no longer need to worry about our own happiness and survival. In Nietzsche's view, this empathic morality is anti-life. Life is really cruel; however it is best to make Will beautiful rather than to deny it. (20) In 1865, Nietzsche thoroughly studied Arthur Schopen Howell's work. He brought the awakening of philosophical interested in reading the "global will and representation" of Schopenhauer, then Schopenhauer has admitted that it is one of the few thinkers that he was respected. I meditate on ancient times with him. In 1866 he read Friedrich Albert Lange 's "History of Materialism". Anti-materialism of the philosophy of Kant, Europe the rise of materialism, growing interest in Europe for science, Charles Darwin's theory of evolution, and the Lange description of the general rebellion of tradition and authority, increasing the interest in Nietzsche I stimulated it. Nietzsche is to discuss the final for the impossibility of evolutionary interpretation of human aesthetic consciousness, cultural environment is spread out his vision he is beyond the linguistics, to encourage it to continue his philosophical research .

I explain that Hume's argument seems to have reasons to explain why miracles are impossible. I agree with Hume's argument, I think it is correct; but I dispute some of his views. The central point that Hume tried to propose was that someone's testimony was unable to create a miracle. David Hume's "miracle" in David Hume's paper? miracle,? Hume has advocated various arguments about why people should not trust any miracle. Hume does not believe that miracles do not exist, but do not believe it because there is no reasonable background. One of his arguments, by definition, miracle is incredible. And there is no reasonable way to believe in miracles. Another argument is that most miracles often come from non-civilized interpretation or define miracles; miracles are violations of natural laws that are unusual for most people. When Hume said: "Nothing is considered a miracle, if it happened in a common process of nature, then he will explain this very clearly. A man that looks healthy will suddenly die It is not a miracle. "Hume, p. 888) Hume said that this death is abnormal, but it seems to happen naturally. Miraculous memory David Hume's "fairness about human understanding" is obvious, and he believes that no miracles will occur. Hume is a logical person who believes in knowledge experience. Of course, such people do not witness them, it is difficult to believe in extraordinary ideas. Especially when these events require a lot of faith. In order for the incident to be regarded as a miracle, it must violate the laws of nature. But, that is the same legal chief. David Hume devoted himself to part of his philosophy and tried to ignore his wrong assertion about the soul. In Hume's doubt, the German idealist began with Emmanuel Kant and left various cognitive and metaphysical problems. David Hume is an Scottish empiricist and became a philosopher for his metaphysical skepticism and explanation of his mind. Hume was born in the 18th century

Learning the language in hell - Through the drama of hell 's journey Dante' s immortality, Dante will enable the reader to experience all his movements. The acquisition of his words, the sensitivity to nature's scenery and sound, and his accumulation of infinite knowledge make it possible for him to capture the reader and to drag it into the territory of the earth. Kant 6, glutton, cant 13, violent against you, hypocrite, Cantonese 23, Dante is good at describing the supernatural world of hell in detail. In each article, Dante combines the familiarity of his words with the sensitivity to natural scenery and sound. Then he raised the image by calling examples Dante's Divine Comedy is one of the most famous and influential literary works in history, Hell in Divine Comedy, and Dante's supervision through Hell Guide is most famous. This summer I will study Dante 's Inferno and plan to move to other parts of this story next year. Like last week, I was vacant in the summer list, I would like to fill it with the novels of the 1980s and raise the theme of literature in July. Since 1980 's, I asked members of the reading book group' Great Books About Great Books' to listen to my favorite novel. I got a lot of wonderful advice, but the title, a wonderful and completely unique book mentioned by many readers made me very excited. Dante Alighieri's hell analysis Dante Alighieri 's Divine Comet is considered the first great poetry in Italy, probably the greatest poetry in medieval Europe. This poem is very famous, one of the small figures, the great leader Kappanez has his name on Jupiter's moon Io's place (blue, 1). In addition, the poem is divided into three brochures, "Inferno", "Purgatorio", and Dantes Inferno In The Innono, and the punishment of many sinners of Dante is suspected of the crime they committed. Like Dante, they feel very pathetic for many sinners in hell at all levels. Many of their revenge seems to be too strict for seemingly bad crimes. Francesca and Paul Di Rimini could not control the love that developed between them, but they were forced to spend eternity on the second lap of hell.

Aristotle is a Greek philosopher and scientist born in 384 - 322 B.C. It was born in St. Gallen, Macedonia. His father played an important role in society as a royal court doctor. Young Aristotle likes Plato and decided to go to his university at the age of 17. Aristotle as a student and as a teacher for the next 20 years was first there. After the death of Plato, Aristotle moved to Asos of Asia Asia, where he advised her friend Elmias, decided to marry his niece. Please refer to Aristotle and Aristotleism, René Descartes and Descartesism, Epicurean and Epicureanism, Religiousism about biographies of the main philosopher of the West and related movement. Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel and Hegelianism, Immanuel Kant and Kantism, Karl Marx and Marxism, Plato and Platonism, Pythagoras and Pythagoreanism. To cover a specific field of Western philosophy, see Aesthetics, Epistemology, Ethics, Thought, Logic, Metaphysics, Biological Philosophy, Educational Philosophy, History Philosophy, Legal Philosophy, Mathematics Philosophy, Mathematics Philosophy. Philosophy Philosophy, Religious Philosophy, Science Philosophy Research on Aristotle's philosophy has influenced the thought of the late Neo-Renaissance. One of the main focus of Aristotle's philosophy is the concept of his systemic logic. Aristotle's goal is to propose a universal process of reasoning that allows people to learn everything possible about reality. The initial process describes objects based on object characteristics, presence state, and actions. In his philosophical paper Aristotle is also discussing ways human beings can get information about things through deductions and reasoning. For Aristotle, reasoning is a reasonable argument, his deductive theory that "when one is decided, the other must appear for their existence" is what philosophers are now calling The basis of syllabic theory is logical. Arguments for inferring conclusions from two or more other forms of some premise Aristotle is a Greek philosopher and scientist born in 384 - 322 B.C. It was born in St. Gallen, Macedonia. His father played an important role in society as a royal court doctor. Young Aristotle likes Plato and decided to go to his university at the age of 17. Aristotle as a student and as a teacher for the next 20 years was first there. - Summary of the rationale of Aristotle's geomorphology: Every time we meet an unknown person, our initial judgment, even if it was reluctant, is often a subconscious from him or her is. The start of the event. Since the character can be is to be only properly identified by the observed words and actions over a period of time, we must rely on what can be seen immediately in the first glance.

Gavlan Top 21 Song of Gavlani Marathi - Marathi Superhit Gavlani is exclusively enjoying the 2017 Marathi Superhit collection at Wings Marathi -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- The 10th Dr. Marathi Dr. MBA's 10th 12th Bachelor's Degree is from KETKIS EDUCATIONAL. Their talk The 10th story of our students in my village of Mala Std 8 Our highest free papers at Marathi The main language collection that will help you write the tenth std file in Software Informer. This is a software package for 10th grade Indian students Sechech internetwebgallery.com, and free papers on various topics - libraries. Melody Enterprise Papers Ethical Hacking 10 papers on how to support environmental research papers on the tenth STD of Mara Nishi thesis: Carolyn Adams.Essay ranked 10th in Marathi? Saving canceled. It already exists. You can take the 10th Marathi Marathi test at Quikr Mumbai Home Free Marathi Papers receive the tenth standard. The 10th Standard Free Marathi Article. article Powerpoint presentation of the best Marathi island on the Internet. Indian 2018 International and International Day List. Write a dissertation in English jasjit singh ap Tips on languages ​​and essay articles worksheets Short article on answers, music and memories Short article in my village of Marathi: December 18, 2017. This is a wonderful paper. The topic of the article, the idea of ​​choosing a good theme for your thesis. 11th and 12th (Maharashtra State), ssc (Maharashtra State), and Primary and Preschool Education. On Kiran's Marathi article 's oven bed - customize your cheaper your guitar amp. Inauguration ceremony of the Orissa High Court. The leader changed the dog's sick article story statement. An essay on the ethics of custom paper on Romanian dissertation Kant having a gun in Texas. Defense Research English Thesis website and development organization - drdo drdo. Father of Marathirenuca - Graphic designer's composition

The United States Constitution was founded in 1863 by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison of Philadelphia. The Constitution changed the lives of people and in the formulation of the Constitution it provided different types of freedom to different people. About 27 amendments are included in the US Constitution, 10 of which is the most important. Because they contain fundamental freedom and equality of the people. The federal government of the paper (James Madison, writing by Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay), as well as Madison, George Washington, Roger Sherman, Guvernier Morris, and please explain the political philosophy of the Constitution on the support. The role of James Wilson and other leaders in writing. And approved the Constitution. The origin and development of slavery, political black-American and its regional, social, religious, economic, and track the impact on cultural development, to identify the strategy to be protected to overthrow it and History file) John Rock is a "liberal" political philosophy, individual rights philosophy, and one of the founders of a limited government. This is the American Constitution and the philosophy that all the political systems of the West today are based. In the second government paper on Locke's most important political activities, he used natural law to demonstrate his philosophy. However, from West Silvia to Thomasism, Grotienne, there are various interpretations of the law of nature. What is the description of the lock? What natural laws support liberal politics? First, as a critical philosophy, as an ancient practice of Persia, it is not a prescription for political content. However, as in the case of ancient philosophy, criticism has constitute a politically appropriate reality: Foucault and the "philosophy should not be used in order to explain that should be made in politics" is I have written. Within stable outside relations, politics, this is true "(2010: 354). As Kant did in the French Revolution, philosophy is in doubting the importance of events. Secondly, the role of criticism is "continue to criticize fraud, fraud, hallucinations" (2010: 354). Is Par? Socrates practice of Sia, the role of philosophy as a criticism is to prejudice the prejudice of the "common opinion", that is, is that trying to get thinking whether you really know that we know. Criticism is always self-criticism, self-care, and self-management

A contemplation in his third meditation of Rene Descartes' first philosophy, Rene Descartes' book 'First Philosophy Contemplation' examines Descartes' discussion about the existence of God. The purpose of this paper is to explore Descartes' inference and proof of the existence of God. In the third meditation, Descartes presented two arguments to prove the existence of God, a trademark argument and a traditional cosmological argument. His claims are powerful and relatively realistic, but they do not prove the existence of God. The contemplation of Rene Descartes' first philosophy is considered to be one of the most important works of modern philosophy. John Rock, Immanuel Kant, and numerous other philosophers have shown most of the reaction to Descartes. However, there is a serious doubt about the main argument of this paper. - Imagine your culture being thrown aside and new culture taught to you. How do you respond? In this story, the author, Jamaica Kinkade talks about her reaction to her and her experience. The writer grew up where British colonial rule took place. She grew up in a small island in the Caribbean, Antigua. She talked about England in her life, this is the place she has never seen before. In the first meditation Descartes thought of the first philosophy, he began to doubt the four beliefs. These beliefs are as follows. The existence of a person's own body, the existence of other bodies / things, mathematical knowledge, and God. Each of these beliefs is based on extreme allegations. Through the fundamental process, Descartes then ascertains whether each belief is there. The first thing that Descartes thought was to judge whether the body was there. He said that some of the facts we currently have will be realized through our senses. But our sense sometimes causes us to misunderstand us wrong conclusions about specific things and situations. In order to prove that sensation is misleading, Descartes leads the reader to "dream arguments". He explained what she might feel when she was dreaming. Interpretation and abstract of Essay.com/ Descartes 'first philosophical considerations' first and second considerations Descartes 'First Meditation and Interpretation and Summary of Descartes' First Meditation and Second Meditation in "First Philosophical Meditation"

Thomas Hobbes is a British philosopher living in 1588-1679. In the era of absoluteism he was an important figure of political philosophy. He has a negative view towards people; he believes that everyone is an opportunist and they will do anything to make their position in society higher. He also believes that people can not trust themselves to make a decision and it is important to be able to master the country's leadership. Therefore, Hobbes believes in absolute monarchy. He also defended the political behavior of the King Charles I of England. Thomas Hobbes vs. Emmanuel Kant Part 1: Thomas Hobbes "Everyone has their own reasons and what can be misused can help him protect his life from his enemies. Si , 120) Thomas Hobbes, considered a reasonable egoist, mentioned this in his book "Leviathan". Hobbes believes that people's behavior depends only on the ultimate influence on that person. Our ultimate ethical responsibility comes from our own interests. Thomas Hobbes' view on the government Thomas Hobbes, in his controversial work Leviathan, such governments based on the control of ordinary people invite disorder and complete confusion. But before understanding Hobbes 'view on the government, it is very important to understand the views of Hobbes' people. - Hobbes, Rock John Rock and Thomas Hobbes were a famous political theorist of the day. Hobbes who was born 40 years before the birth of rock has a totally different view from rock and both will do more research through this article. Many theories differ in the 16th century, but the rise of the country and the decline of the feudal system caused authority problems, so Hobbes and Rock's theory got closer.

This book explores the theoretical problem at the center of practical ethics: What is the standard of moral status? In other words, what are the standards of entities that have moral obligations? Some philosophers believe that there are inherent wealth, such as life, perception, humanity, and moral institutions. Others believe that the attributes of relations such as belonging to human society are more important. In the first part of this book, the author believes that we can not use property as the sole standard of moral status. In 1997's book "The Moral Status: Human and Human Duties", Warren proposed a practical approach to determine the "multi-standard" theory, common sense, moral status and attract readers' morality Did. Intuition She pointed out that it is this universal and good intuition that leads to moral reflection and judgment. Warren believes that the burden of showing social moral flaws - wrong reasoning or inappropriate empirical data depends on those who challenge it As a person's condition, it gives the doctor personal moral values ​​and a superior moral status as a person's condition. (2) As a doctor's autonomy, it provides a moral status as a doctor's knowledge and duty and uses it wisely ; (3) Ethical community with collective responsibility for autonomous patients and society as professionals. I have written moral obligations and medical autonomy as moral communities elsewhere, but as the first two structures of individuals it is limited to the autonomy of doctors. Autonomy is extremely important in certain moral frameworks as a model of moral persons, that is, as a characteristic of morally obliged persons and as an aspect of taking over others' duties to their own persons. For Kant, voluntary taxation of universal moral law is the basis of general moral obligation and respect for others (we are responsible for ourselves). In short, the real reason - the ability to choose your own actions using rationality - assumes that you understand yourself as free. Although freedom demands us to use the law to guide our decisions, we mean that our actions have no barriers beyond our will I will. See Hill 1989). This autonomous moral law is autonomous. Furthermore, since this law should not have the meaning or content provided by a wish, or other incidental aspect of our situation, it must be universal.

Today's women have reduced gender disparity with men, defeated them at university entrance and have reduced the wage gap of Americans by about 17 cents over the past 20 years (USA). . In spite of the remarkable progress of women, the contraindications of sexual women and the concept of filthy women still exist. The role of gender and sexual behavior are major conflicts in today's American politics. In the Republican presidential election campaign, Rick Santram said, "America is suffering from pornographic content (Friedersdorf)" Crusaders claim he is a family value. Also in the text, "There are too many families with you. Porn transformed women into "adult toys" and Susan Brown Miller, a feminist activist, journalist, co-founder of a female anti-pornography (WAP), wrote in 1975 as follows: "Eroticism is theory, rape is practice," Robin Morgan, a former editorial magazine, announced in 1977. Some people consider pornography to be a type of fear. A woman wrote in 1981 by the most famous anti-pornographic feminist supporter, "I know that we are free if pornography is gone." In 1996, the law scholar Catherine McKinnon opposed the idea that pornography is a creative practice with the right to receive protection of the first amendment. McKinnon, pornography itself is not responsible for women who are sexually assaulted, but writes "a man who creates, modifies, promotes pornography". Helen Longino was one of the first feminist philosophers who clarified the theory that pornography harm women. She believes that pornography shows that men and women are satisfied with the recognition of women as women's objectiveness and the activities under human beings. Pornography promotes the idea that women are treated without moral consideration (ie, being raped and conquered) by depicting women's subjects as inhumane subjects. Lon Nono believes that gender is morally problematic according to philosopher Emmanuel Conde. Even if it is not impossible, it is not a pure means of not treating others as our own satisfaction. It is also very difficult to have sex in the situation. Sexual desire is irrational, it will be objective, inhuman and slanderous as it reduces others to sexual part. Langino believes that since men have greater social power than women, men can use women as a tool to satisfy sexual intercourse, thereby adding feminist elements to Kant.

Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill were both British philosophers born at the same time, Bentham in 1748, Mill in 1806. What they have in common is that they are the main beneficiaries of utilitarianism. Jeremy Bentham is a philosopher, economist, theorist, and one of the major talkers and developers of utilitarianism (Encyclopædia Britannica Online, s. "Jeremy Bentham"). John Stuart Mill is also known for some of what he did. Utilitarianism is a moral theory, usually resulting from Jeremy Bentham. Bentham and John Stuart Mill are considered to be two major representatives of this theory. Mill wrote after Bentham and adapted some of his ideas to a slightly different version of Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is the theory of result-basedism, which means that it can only decide whether it is right or wrong based on the outcome of the action or the situation of the action. The theory is relative, there is no rule to judge the situation separately and to impose guidelines on behaviors to be observed in each case. This avoids the main problems confronted by absoluteism such as natural law and Kant Ethics. The right thing brings happiness, and Thomas Carlyle criticizes it as directly criticizing it as "crime only valuable to pig". As a man with reason and wisdom, Carlyle seems to want things from moral theory rather than utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is the right act in promoting happiness and it is wrong when it promotes misfortune. Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832) is the founder of this theory and John Mill (1706-1873) became the supporter of this theory. John Bentham (1748-1832) argues that pain and happiness not only explains our behavior but also helps us to judge what is good and moral. According to Bentham's hedonism, utilitarianism says that we should always take actions that lead to great joy. In fact, in order to overcome this problem, is there a way to measure happiness so that it can be compared with other behaviors?

Regarding moral genealogy, Nietzsche will focus on education of history and philosophy, and determine the origin of evil. In Nietzsche, Nietzsche tried to understand the conditions that allow humans to invent value judgment between such good and evil. It is this connection that requires extreme caution in order to get the answer you are looking for. According to Nietzsche, these answers distinguish between period, population, level between individuals, and assumptions and probabilities. In "Genealogy of Morals," Friedrich Nietzsche provided three articles challenging morality as an eternal, absolute truth belief derived from the origin of another world. The first article "Good and evil, Good and evil" introduces the concept of "Moral of Master" and "Moral of Slave". This distinction serves as the basis for subsequent genealogy analysis. In the second article "Nervousness, Conscience, and Similarity", Nietzsche explains how the morality of slavery changes and rebuilds the relationship between sin and punishment. This in turn led to what he calls "bad heart." In the last article, "What is the ideal meaning of asceticists?" Discusses human reactions to the creation of conscience and his attempt to overcome this reaction. By showing the evolving nature of moral concepts throughout history Nietzsche tried to use a pedigree approach to reveal the motives and meanings behind the human reassessment of "morality". Essay.com/ Family about ethics: works of history and imagination? On Moral Pedigree of Friedrich Nietzsche A pedigree about morality: a work of history or imagination? On Moral Pedigree of Friedrich Nietzsche The morality of the master-slave is the central theme of Friedrich Nietzsche's work, especially the first article of "moral lineage". Nietzsche believes that there are two basic types of morality: "dominant morality" and "slave morality". Mastering the pride and power of moral value, slavery morality assesses goodness, compassion, and consideration. Unlike the morality of slavery, morality of ethics measures good or bad outcome behavior (ie classical virtue and vice, resultism) and the morality of slaves emphasizes the behavior of good malicious images (Example: Christian's virtue and vice, Kant morality)

Everyone has a world view. This might not be what we always think, but we all have one. The view of the world is a series of beliefs that we use to understand the world. It shapes our idea of ​​how to interpret the reality and forms our moral. Our traditional view of the world consists mostly of secular, work, money, family and even education. Then there is a Christian worldview which is our sacred act. A view of the world of Christians or the Bible is based on the word of God. When the word of God is the foundation of your daily life. But how do Christians find in common with philosophers? And is their basic assumption that Christian's view of the world is wrong? How to see Christianity from the point of view of Kant and Hegel - at least Biblical Christianity - Why not think about (basically) the world as the creation of our own mind? How do you find a common ground that will be dismissed by Dewey, not just the Christian principles, but the whole tradition of Western philosophy? Assuming that there is no real thing outside the material world, how do you find common grounds with Comte or Marx based on the whole teachings? How do you know the common points of Sartre? The basic premise is that God does not exist, so there is no objective moral standard. After visiting Christian's view of the world, I have never thought about that view of the world. I naturally have a Christian world view as a Christian, but I really do not know what that means. I am not thinking much about the nature of God and human beings and even the causes of evil and suffering. I do not doubt my Christianity, but I doubt the understanding of it and the ability to protect Christian beliefs. - "The church needs to regain America!" Many Christians say. The problem is that this should really be the focus of the church. According to the chapter of Johnstead in his book, "Think in the Bible." Recovering Christian's view of the world, this is not a legitimate purpose of the church

Aristotle In 384 BC, Nicomasias and Pestus experienced the birth of his son Aristotle in a small town called Staggila, on the coast of the northeastern part of the Cádiz peninsula. As descendants of the medical family, Aristotle engages in physics, biology, psychology, chemistry, zoology, botany, dynamics, mathematics and other aspects. You say it, Aristotle studied it. He is also interested in finding knowledge. (Aristotle, Barnes PG. 2). Quoting his condition - "Acquiring wisdom is fun; I feel like everyone is at home in philosophy, I want to spend time on it and I want to put aside everything else." Stoic He uses phraseology instead of meaning Why is philosophy? As suggested by Aristotle, studies of philosophy, "love of wisdom", creation and development of thoughtful thinking can be accepted without accepting thought. In the philosophical worldview, Republicans who disregard tax increases and economic stimulus can at least consider the concept of tax increases and Keynesian economics. Democrats who face the opposite idea can do the same. Thoughts, not anger, may be the default response to the world view. Indeed, philosophy can do a lot to alleviate anger growth against modern American cancer tumors. These tools are present in East and West thought - accepted in the absolute order of Stoic's recommendation, Buddhist meditation, transcendence of humanistic reason, Kant. In the words of Socrates, philosophy will help us plant virtues. Philosophy aims to make the idea logically clear. Philosophy is activity, not doctrine. Philosophical work basically includes interpretation. Philosophy leads not to a "philosophical proposition", but rather to clarification of propositions. In the absence of philosophical thinking, it is ambiguous: the job is to clarify, clarify and give them a clear boundary. (4.112) When I see a woman exchanging beauty with gold, we will see a man like a normal prostitute; but she rewards her with the passion of a precious young man, At the same time we gain respect for our respect. This is in agreement with philosophy: he sells it to a public auction and is a cunning public prostitute who is disposed of to give the best price

In "Exploration of Human Understanding", David Hume first contrasts two aspects of human reasoning, two aspects of moral philosophy, or human science (Hume 1). On the one hand it focuses on shaping human behavior and on the other it focuses on rationality. The first one is simple and obvious, the others are difficult and accurate. Hume shows that a simple and obvious philosophy appears more in mediocre life; it allows humans to become more benign and encourages emotions. Hume is an experientist and skeptical. His philosophy of development is usually approached by scientists, so he believes that he can make laws for human understanding. Hume studied understanding as an experientialist and tried to understand the origin of human thought. Empiricism is the concept that all knowledge comes from experience. Skepticism is to investigate things to find things that lead to personal reasons or those that feel particular emotions without knowing what is in nature in advance. Objectively speaking, there is a delicate boundary between reasoning and people's feelings, but philosophers Immanuel Kant and David Hume seem to have a big difference in views on this issue. Both are philosophers who change their lives, and they have different views. One sees the emotions of humanity, while the other seems to be seeing rationality. Understanding philosophical anthropology One way to find ways to understand the essence of humanity by considering different methodological approaches is to think of two questions: "What is a human?" And "Who am I "Various answers are given, but the most famous philosophical definition is still a classic definition proposed by Aristotle. The essence of man is "animal of reason".

Introduction: History of transcendence and modern and contemporary theology - Enlightenment: disintegration of classical balance - inherent in theology of the 19th century: E. Man · Kant; GWF Hegel; Friedrich Schliermach; Albrecht Richl and classical free theology - Resisting the inner resistance: Beyond the new orthodox: Carl Bath, Emile Brenner, Rudolf Bartmann, Rhodolph Bartmann, Rheinhold de Nier - Internal deepening: Reform of the liberalism tradition: Paul Tillich. Process Theology - Inherent in secularization: radical movement: Dietrich Bonhofer; Secular theology - Transcendence to the future: Theology of hope: Jürgen Moltmann; Wolfhart Pannenberg - Liberal theology in oppression experience: Liberal theology: Latin American theology; Feminist theology; Human spirit transcendence: New Catholic theology: Karlana Hans Küng - The story of the story Transcendence: theology of the story - balance of reconfirmation: evangelical theology middle school: Carl FH Henry; Bernardram - conclusion: Past contributions and future prospects, seeking transcendence and inner theology Science and sociology rediscovered the transcendence of God; the last few decades of theological efforts of the 20th century got over the purely anthropological interpretation of religion and once again discovered that transcendence. Therefore, theology faces a trinity problem in a new form, and since God's Christian experience is the experience of the existence of the father, the son, and the Holy Spirit, it can not be ruled out. The starting point for Christians to understand something about humans is to recognize that human beings were created in God's statue. This view considers that God and human beings are connected through a mysterious connection. God is thought not to understand and transcends essence, but God wants to reflect the image of God in a group of living things, and to select a human for that. Therefore, as an image of God, it belongs to God's self-revelation in a fairly decisive way. In the 20th century, the focus of mainstream Christian theology changed from focusing on the natural world to focusing on spiritual problems. For example, Catholic and mainstream Protestant theology accepted scientific evidence of evolution. Through the process of evolution, God created a view called "theological evolution". But Biblical scholar Christian theology continues to explain nature through the Bible, such as the creation of "scientists", for example. For example, the geology column was built by the water where Noah's flood ceased. An important influence of William Paley to Charles Darwin who studied theology at Cambridge University and made famous interpretations of God's theological argument. In 1802 he published evidence of God's existence and attributes from the natural or natural appearance. Here he explains the analogy of watchmakers, and he may be best known for this. However, his book is one of the most published works of the 19th and 20th centuries, which presents some theoretical and cosmological arguments about the existence of God. This book serves as a template for many subsequent natural theology in the 19th century.

Morality in the Dark Mind "I think boring all the moral philosophies so far and allowing them to discover worship" (Nietz 561). Perhaps this is a fact, but the issue of moral philosophy was discussed over time and provided an important element of the story of Conrad's "dark heart." In general, eternal discussion can go beyond Plato's first philosophical research, and general religious reasons for general application and code of conduct supported by Kant and Mills. These individuals and ideas try to establish a "good" code of conduct based on something. Merciful God, resembling an extensible norm. While studying Joseph Conrad 's "Dark Heart" hero and anti - hero Joseph Conrad' s "Dark Heart", many critics are talking about heroism. The main character is Marlow, Kurz. Obviously, Marlow and Kurtz are the hero of this story; but the hero and the hero are not necessarily synonyms. Marlo is a hero in a traditional sense, but Kurz is a more modern hero, often called an anti-hero. Marlow started trying to put bread on the table just like everyone else. Joseph Conrad's novel "The Heart of Darkness" has a strong moral theme. The goal of Conrad 's moral use is moral mess. The main character Charlie Marlow started a journey of European ivory trading to Africa. During this journey, he found a dark dilemma of morality. Marlow was looted by greed and imperialism and found how easy it would be to be inhumane without an organized civil society. Greed is an important part of giving up morality in this novel. This story's ivory is a symbol of greed and evil. The Caucasian Europeans came to Africa and had special preferences for teeth, but they were also greedy in power. Characters in the novel called Kurtz got ivory than other stations. His strength and greed made him a thief and a murderer. He believes in "My intention, my ivory, my station, my river, everything I say." (Conrad 79) The dark heart of Joseph Conrad was based on Conrad's own experience as the captain of the Riverboat of West Africa in 1890. Conrad reveals the story of the main character Marlow who embarked on the Congo to find the ivory businessman Kurutsu. As Marlow departed from the coast, he was able to overcome the signs of "dark heart" to exploit local residents of Europe, but Cruz was once an ideal young man. Leader Conrad's story implies Murrow's unexplainable fear and allows readers to imagine behaviors other than civilized human behavior. In the adventure, as Marlow deepens into the abyss of the jungle, readers can form a new perspective each time they read the story.

"We will appear in art only when it is used without superior tools and its technical and rational grounds are not excellent." 1 George Cooper, a famous art historian in the 20th century, I will support. Besides artistic expression there is no use or need for society. However, Kübler's idea is more than a contemporary idea. Emmanuel Conde of the 18th century philosopher officially proposed this theory. Kant separates art from useful art, and maintaining the artist's goal must convey aesthetics through shape and design. Art can also play a role in healing. This is an idea that is being explored with art therapy. Although definition and practice are different, art therapy is often understood as a form of treatment that uses art media as its primary means of communication. This is a relatively young field first introduced in the mid-20th century. Historically, art has been designed to appeal to human wisdom, although there is no true limit. In general, the art movement reacts intelligently and aesthetically with each other in all ages. With the introduction of conceptual and postmodern theory almost everything can be called art. In general, art represents an attempt to explore human condition and a deeper understanding of life. Art is defined here as an aspect of art, craftwork skill, design where jobs are developed primarily for aesthetic, intellectual or conceptual purposes, primarily rather than functional and practical considerations . Students who undertake this title must have practical and relevant critiques and backgrounds like historical and contemporary artists' works, as well as various purposes, intentions, and functions of art suitable for their own work I have to look for it. They should demonstrate the ability to creatively apply processes and techniques appropriate to the field of research they choose: for example: painting (various media); painting (various media); printing (eg screen printing; etching; Sculpture; styling; architecture; inlaid; mobile phone; environmental art; Sgraffito; dynamic media; photo-based media; digital media; hybrid media It is ridiculous to say that art does not go well. Art is a function of everyday life. First, art works for that creator. Art can be expressed through clothing, family and art, expression, residence, food, jewelry and religion, to name a few. Even architects, fashion designers, even gardeners rely on art to earn income. Artists such as painters, photographers, chefs make a living through artistic expression. Why was art created so that it could exist? Art is not its own function, it's its creator. When people think about artists, the original idea will be a painter, a sculptor and a photographer. Yes, all of these people are creating works of art to exhibit in museums and exhibitions. By so doing, the public can see them and perhaps buy them.

Everyone in Dante's hell, Hamlet, judgment, and Joyce's depraved morality remembers hatred and evil who threatens happy people in fairy tales. Indeed, many of these fairy tales are defined by well - defined good prototypes and bad prototypes, using distinct physical stereotypes. It is worth noting that these fairy tales are mainly old and based on ancient stories. Modern stories and epics do not provide these clear definitions; they continuously force to redefine the definition of morality as completely bad heroes and less sneaky villains. Reynolds found that Joyce's second snow and starvation story claims, according to Brett Heart's Gabriel Conroy, Joyce states hell 33 is more eye-catching. It has some similarities with Dante's Hell version, especially his Kant 33 (Reynolds doubts); it also confirms that Joyce juxtaposed famine and famine with "dead". In addition to the importance of the heart to the "dead" title, the beginning line of the Heart's story is very parallel with the last paragraph of Joyce: Everyone in Dante's hell, Hamlet, judgment, and Joyce's depraved morality remembers hatred and evil who threatens happy people in fairy tales. Indeed, many of these fairy tales are defined by well - defined good prototypes and bad prototypes, using distinct physical stereotypes. It is worth noting that these fairy tales are mainly old and based on ancient stories. - Oedipus Rex in the eucalyptus tragedy, Hamlet's tragedy, desire change endured easily with the greatest of all types, as it endured the test of time. Formally, the tragedy uses something more complicated than the other types. It is not part of a happy life. It is part of a larger system. This is a part of us "Dante Alighieri's Hell" is a classic literary work originally translated by Ciaran Carson written by Dante himself. This is the first part of Dante's three epic "Divine Comedy". "Hell of Dante Alighieri" leads gradually to a journey from the familiar secular land to the depth of hell for redemption. The text of Dante is perfect, as you read this book, these images will be very interesting. natural Inferno (pronounced "hell" in Italian) is the first part of the 14th century epic "Divine Comedy" by Italian writer Dante Alighieri. Purgatorio and Paradiso follow. Under the guidance of the ancient Roman poet Virgil, Inferno tells the story of Dante's journey through hell. In this verse hell is depicted as torture of nine concentric circles within the Earth; it is "to deceive or malice them by bending to savage food appetite and violence or by distorting their human wisdom In the area of ​​those who reject their spiritual value, as a fable, the comet of God represents the journey of the soul to God, and hell explains the recognition and refusal of sin.

"In reality, the Nazis are like us, the nightmare they have proved human ability" (Arendt 1945 quoted from Cohen in 1994). The aim of this paper is to solve the "extreme evil" theory and to determine how it is incorporated into Hannah Arend's paper "malice." This is done by first unraveling the main evil concept of Emmanuel Kant's "extreme" and summarizing its meaning. A report on the Eichmann: Plain of Evil (1963) at Jerusalem at Hannah Arendt was explored and how the main proposition of Kant affected and some conversion to Arendt's explanation will be made. I proposed another interpretation of the big judge's metaphor. Attempts by Dostoyevski to explore the "natural" evil with mankind reaches a climax in this fable In the face of this extreme evil, G - d is actually stupid and helpless. Because all other living things are not malignant, extreme evil can only be embodied in humans. So Christ must stand up and react to the questioner ... Somehow, Dostoyevsky is absent Exploring the sacred essence, in some way this lacking is our extreme life It led to the expression of this state of mind, which led to lead to multiple expressions. The nature of the clown that he explored in "double" is consistent with Karamazov's father. Although Goliadkin could not send sensual life, his father's "beyond life" sexuality expanded to infringe on his son Dimitri's sexual orientation. The crisis caused by this desire may end with violence, but it is blocked by mercy. William Golding has devoted his life's work to the essence of mankind. Most of the main themes of his novels are the conflict between civilization and barbarism, good and evil, and the source of evil within humanity. The focus of this paper is the most famous novel by his first two. "Flies and successors of the Lord". The purpose of this article is to analyze barbaric themes of these books. The purpose of this paper is to guess what the goalding is trying to convey about the essence of human beings and to analyze how he understands and treats barbarians. The theoretical foundation of this thesis is a comprehensive definition of civilian, barbaric, barbarian terms derived from its etymology and its significance in various social sciences, and the moral doctrine of Golding himself so Through this humanitarian project, we have examined the impact of religion on people's perception and evil evaluation. The focus of this research begins with exploring the concepts of good and evil and the definition of work as well as recognizing social groups such as religion. In order to obtain empirical data, we studied a group of 100 people who judged whether they were Christians or not. The survey asked the individual to evaluate 10 different evil situations based on the degree of evil (10 is the most evil) in the range of 1 to 10. Christianity has earned a much higher reputation than rapesis, murder, fraud / lie, pre-marital sex, war, teasing / insulting, incest incest and illegal drug use, if there is no religious evaluation . Between Christians there is no big difference between suicide and fraud / theft, and there is no religious rating.

The contemplation of Rene Descartes' first philosophy is considered to be one of the most important works of modern philosophy. John Rock, Immanuel Kant, and numerous other philosophers have shown most of the reaction to Descartes. However, there is a serious doubt about the main argument of this paper. In opposing opinion and correspondence, philosopher Antoine Arnauld raised the question whether Descartes made circular reasoning. In the first meditation Descartes thought of the first philosophy, he began to doubt the four beliefs. These beliefs are as follows. The existence of a person's own body, the existence of other bodies / things, mathematical knowledge, and God. Each of these beliefs is based on extreme allegations. Through the fundamental process, Descartes then ascertains whether each belief is there. The first thing that Descartes thought was to judge whether the body was there. He said that some of the facts we currently have will be realized through our senses. But our sense sometimes causes us to misunderstand us wrong conclusions about specific things and situations. In order to prove that sensation is misleading, Descartes leads the reader to "dream arguments". He explained what she might feel when she was dreaming. Interpretation and abstract of Essay.com/ Descartes 'first philosophical considerations' first and second considerations Descartes 'First Meditation and Interpretation and Summary of Descartes' First Meditation and Second Meditation in "First Philosophical Meditation" In his meditation on 'the first philosophy', Descartes basically wrote a skeptical approach. In his universal allegation system, Descartes accepted only those beliefs that dismissed all his beliefs and could prove expressly. Descartes is a mathematician, a philosopher, and a skeptic, I admire his work as a novice mathematician, philosopher, and skeptic. However, apart from his skeptical approach, I think that his logic is inaccurate and his argument is irrational. In Descartes' sixth meditation, when jumping to an article in front of him, he defined himself as a mind and body double principle. His allegiance to this involves his assumption on how very inappropriate data and the mind and body interact, and if they are two different substances, it is the most desirable promising way of thinking is.

Edwin Powell Hubble: The greatest astronomers of the 19th century have flashing the flashing stars. Like empty diamonds, it is very high worldwide (Gardner 98). For many people, a star is a wonderful miracle. That is why some people spend most of their lives considering why the world is so expensive (Gardner 98). Those people study and draw small stars of flash for better meaning; they are astronomers. Great astronomers such as Edwin Hubble, Emmanuel Kant, William Huggins have never stopped paying attention to the beauty of the stars. Edwin Hubble, Edwin Powell Hubble, November 20, 1889, Marsh Field, Missouri, September 28, 1953, San Marino, California, USA astronomer, an important role playing in the field of astronomy outside the river Is often considered the main observational cosmologist in the 20th century. In 1906, Hubble received a scholarship from the University of Chicago where he served as a student laboratory laboratory for the Nobel Prize winner physicist Robert Milliken. Hubble graduated in 1910 and was elected a scholar of Rhodes of Illinois. He spent three years at Oxford University and received the theme of B.A. in his father's argument law. After his father died in 1913 his way of pursuing a scientific career was opened. Edwin Hubble was born in Virginia Lee Hubble (1864-1934) and Johns Powell Hubble, an insurance company Marshfield, Missouri, and moved to Illinois in 1900. Danton his motor skills exceeded his spell as well as his intelligence, but he noticed more than younger days, but he achieved good results in all subjects. Edwin is a competent athlete who runs baseball, soccer, basketball and runway in high school and university. He has held various positions in the basketball court from center to shooting guard. In fact, Mr. Hubble led the University of Chicago basketball team to the first conference championship in 1907. He won seventh place and third place in 1906 single high school track and field competition. Edwin Hubble is in the center of the observer at the top of the 200-inch telescope tube at the Palomar mountain. This telescope, like the Hubble Space Telescope named after the Edwin Hubble telescope, was considered a technical miracle when used in 1948. Images are from Mount Wilson and Palomar Observatories / AIP. We will reproduce Hubble's Law as Hubblerema's Law. In late October 2018, members of the International Astronomical Union, the most famous non-astronomer in 2006, downgraded Pluto from the main planet.

How often do you need double shooting, second eye, follow-up observation, and even multiple follow-up surveys? The answer is simple: every day. The second thing you see often is that it is worthless seeing intelligently, even by an unreasonable teenager trying to trick some sort of evil skateboard, a monkey drinking his urine, or even a two-headed cat Often it is. Their second or third is watching meaningful wise ones. Verbal judgment of "value" of an entity such as art work, literary work, other kinds of things, events, sentences, utterances can not be decided independently. Objective "property ... it can judge entity or value (and usually it is): ie the speaker has how entities are in a limited set of objects under limited conditions In the economy, the "characteristics" of the work - its "structure", "property", "quality" and of course its "meaning" are not fixed in the work itself. Whether given or intrinsic, variable specific subjects interact with the product in each way. Both the normative theories of all cultures, including those under the names of political leftists and political leftists, both have vested rights and vested rights. Please judge. When a philosopher talks about his or her judgment, we usually mean the ability to recognize artistic and aesthetic qualities of nature. Traditionally, this judgment is considered subjective and universal. It is subjective as it is based on feelings and emotions, and "subjective" is universal because it does not mean that we can not agree with emotions and the happiness of sharing. Historically, the problem of philosophers was to constantly recognize the subjective characteristics of the taste while avoiding the relativism that goes into personal preferences that can not be understood. They want to confirm important criteria for judging art in the face of the high degree of subjective pleasure in our hobbies. Kant pointed out that beauty is not a characteristic of art and natural phenomena but a sense of pleasure enjoying freedom of imagination and understanding. Judgment of pure taste is subjective. Because it refers to the emotional response of the subject and is based only on the respect of the object itself. It is selfless pleasure. . It is important to note that this universal validity comes from common sense, not from the concept of beauty. Evolution of emotional responses contributes to the decision making of animals, which can prolong the long-term survival of life better. Given this objective fact, understanding of beauty is not completely subjective. It can be said that things and ideas contain more or less beauty in the ability to promote more or less survival.

Introduction There is a long history of typology in public parks. Many parks were originally private estates such as royal hunting grounds and Tiergarten in Berlin. The roots of others are the acquisition of public land by local governments. This aim is to create a fun urban green space for Vancouver's Stanley Park. With the arrival of the industrial park, the public park movement started in the UK. As people move to the city and leave the country, public green spaces are needed, which causes all social classes to interact in the atmosphere of the park and leads to irregular behavior outside the park. Paul Natop (1854 - 1924) was also a German philosopher and educator. In 1899 he published Sozialpädagogik: Social Education: Theory of Human Willing Education as Community Assets). According to him, education should be social, therefore it should be an interaction between education and social processes. Natlup believes in the Gemeinshaft (small community) model to build universal happiness and achieve true humanity. At that time, philosophers such as Jean-Jacques Rousseau, John Locke, Johann Heinrich Pestalozzi, Immanuel Kant and others focused on the social structure and its influence on human relations. Philosophers look at things that can be brought about not only to consider children as people but also to create human solidarity and social order. Paul Natorp (1854-1924), a German philosopher and educator who is the founder of social education, published "Sozialpädagogik: Theorie der Willensbildung" in 1899 (Social Education: Humans). Educational theory is incorporated into community assets). Natorp thinks that education should be social in every case. Teachers need to consider the interaction of education and social processes. Since the theory of social learning has gained access to the field of developmental psychology through psychologists such as Julian Rotter, Albert Bandura, Robert Sears and experiments, the field of developmental psychology has undergone a major change It was. In 1954, Julian Rotter developed a theory of social learning that combines changes in human behavior with environmental interactions. Predictable variables are the possibility of action, expectation, and increased value and mental state.

Euthyphro's dilemma in Prato's dialogue "Euthyphro", Socrates suggested a choice to Euthyphro. Euthyphro reacts by arguing that belief is an accepted [love] or acknowledged acceptance by God; rude is that God does not agree. But as Socrates pointed out, this problem would be a dilemma for those who believe Euthyphro has only God's authority to reveal the truth. The dilemma of Euthyphro was raised in Plato dialogue between Socrates and Euthyphro. In this scene, when Socrates raised a dilemma, Socrates and Euthyphro were talking about the essence of godliness. The dilemma of Euthyphro allows behavior to be a good reaction for God to order actions or to order God to act. If you choose the first one, it means that the command of God must be good: even if he orders someone to exert pain, that pain must be moral . If the latter is chosen, morality no longer depends on God, but it breaks God's command theory. In addition, if God is bound by external law, he will not be sovereign or omnipotent, it will challenge the orthodox concept of God. Plato's meditation on God's command theory can be found in his dialogue Euthyphro. The reasons for suffering Euthyphro are as follows. "Is God morally good so that you can order morally good things or do you morally do good to be commanded from God?" The latter is true, justice is arbitrary , If the former is true, morality exists higher than God, God is just a successor to moral knowledge. Several philosophers think this is a faulty predicament. Tenderness is the nature of God, it is inevitably reflected in God's orders. Another reaction promoted in the context of Emmanuel Kant and C. S. Lewis is that the existence of moral objective morality means the existence of God and vice versa. In the platonic dialogue "Euthyphro" there is a famous word that "Pious (τ ὸὸ σ ι υ υ, that is, morally good) is loved by the gods Is it loveed by God that it is godly? Or is it pious? "This is what people think of morality. Another important topic being widely discussed in Abraham's monotheistic religious philosophy is human free will and the question of God's omniscience. The omniscience of God, including perfect understanding of the future, leads theological determinism, which may conflict with free will of mankind. Regarding this point, there are various positions such as liberalism (free will is true) and reservation.

"Their throat is an open grave and their tongue practices fraud" (Romans 3: 13). Since God changed Satan into a fascinating snake, "When urging Satan to slide into his" abdomen "for his deception" Since the "collapsed" snakes became a universal symbol of literary fraud (Alter 41)) Dante uses snakes in his epic "hell" and associates the fraudulent nature of thieves in the seventh hell on lap eight with their punishment. As time passed, the snake fell figuratively, showed a new figure and became a social crook. Dante made hell in the hell of Dante and drew a hell that Dante believed. For many readers, Dante's hell is strange, but in some cases the text is actually relevant to today's society. In other cases, the era has changed so the correlation between Dante's hell and today's society has declined. Eating big is one of the most permanent problems today. In Dante's hell, the people accused of crime are constantly raining with feces to punish what they did. Today, if people are overweight, society thinks it is disgusting and disgusting; people overweight are considered gluttonous. There is no doubt that many of these people live today with Dante's hell. They are shunned by society, laughing and laughing. Not only are they mocked and disliked by society, they will despise and hate themselves even if they do not appear every day. Avoid the pain of hell. The famous Italian poet Dante Alighieri writes about the physical depiction of hell and the punishment of all sinners against their sins. The comedy of God records the journey of Dante from the depth of hell to the glory of heaven, but it contains a deeper meaning. Through his motif, interaction with sinners, and other literary works and hell combinations, Dante reveals the true meaning of hell. "Inferno's Kant 18's Dante Alighieri's iterative theme, Marcel Proust once said that Rao us ..." A trip to explore wisdom through wild is happening at The Inferno of Dante Alighieri. Inferno is the first part of a trilogy called epic, god comedy. Inferno talks about the narrator

Summary of Aristotle's ancient critic's indefinite article: An ancient comment by Aristotle's De Interpretatione provides us with an important element for a clearer understanding of some of the difficulties of this article It is. Regarding indefinite names and verbs ("not-man" and "not not recover", respectively), these comments not only explain the nature of uncertainty but also the doctrines explaining why Aristotle introduced them Peri Hermeneias is in the office to clarify. An ancient Greek Aristotle critic over 15,000 pages, ancient critics of Aristotle, is the largest corpus of the current Greek philosophy written between 200 and 500 AD years ago and has not previously been translated into English did. Or other European languages. This series of translations fills important gaps in the history of European thought. ¿ 1/288 649 Anthropological Perspective Kant, Emmanuel is based on Kant's last lecture for his anthropology course, which he taught from 1772 until 1796 retirement. Their purpose is to cover a wide audience and they are not just to clarify Kant's point of view. A unique contribution to the field of new anthropology is also his practical view of providing students with the status of the world and humanity. 296 pgs. • 2006 Aristotle was born in Macedonia in 384 BC. Aristotle 's father, Nicomas is a court doctor. When Nicomachus passed away, Aristotle got his father's legacy According to ancient sources, he ran out of time in a short period of time. Since then, he studied at Platon University in Athens at the age of seventeen. Initially, Aristotle agreed with Plato's doctrine. In the process of discovering Platonic contradiction, he insisted Plato. In other words, Aristotle is against Plato's doctrine. On the other hand, Aristotle is the first person to have his own special library.

"Today, things accepted as knowledge can be abandoned tomorrow." We live in a strange and inexplicable world. Despite the rapid increase in knowledge over the past century, we are confronted with many confusingly inconsistent views. Since the knowledge that was previously thought to be true is replaced by a new idea, a number of inconsistent ideas lead to replacement of knowledge. Rapid development of technology accelerates this and conducts new investigations of knowledge in human science and natural science. Modern knowledge theory was introduced with his "critic system" by famous philosopher Emmanuel Kant. Some authors believe that knowledge is part of the philosophy of the term epistemology, but now it has evolved into independent science. Education of knowledge, organization of libraries, and many other very practical implementations. For me, knowledge theory is the most useful subject at school as it provides me the basis for solving any problems, questions and challenges in my daily life. The way we study and think about knowledge is a tool in our hands. According to the knowledge theory guide issued on behalf of the International Baccalauré Organization (IBO), the purpose of the Knowledge Theory Course is to encourage students to "consider the nature of knowledge and ponder all learning processes". They study subjects and connect with them as part of the diploma program. "Knowledge theory courses, creativity, behavior, services (CAS), and extended papers form the three core elements of the IB curriculum and require IB diplomas:" Educate everyone "

Arthur Schopenhaur Schopenhauer understands the will and the will has to be separated. Will to life and human will. The will of life is all the effort every animal does every day, and it is the will to survive. Schopenhauer believes that the essence of life is suffering and this suffering is reflected in the will of life. However, in the case of humans, this also manifests itself as working for the human will, ie for life such as learning and reading. This type of human beings also can cause pain and conflict. Once humans reach the goal, another target will have a series of problems and pain. Arthur Schopenhaur is a German philosopher born in Danzig, Poland. The two most philosophers he admired were Kant and Plato, but he was also influenced by Goethe and Eckhart. Schopenhaur proposes three important points from the distinction between Kant's phenomenon and ontology: Firstly, the reality is a phenomenal world, an illusion created by our own emotions and understanding, secondly, Space, temporality, and causal relationship Finally, the world of ontology can be "known" but only by the identity of one person. He did not agree with Kant's view and he believed that he could not know things themselves. Schopenhaur insists that we can understand the reality just like ourselves, as each of us is reality for ourselves. In our own essence, we find that we are not mere physical bodies nor a reasonable heart but ourselves. All other aspects of ourselves are mere expressions of this will Arthur Schopenhaur believes the will is blind. It has no purpose other than the persistence of life itself. Apart from the will of life, Schopenhaur emphasizes that it has no meaning. He raises many examples from insect-like nature emerging from the eggs on the earth, fly a little under the sun, lay eggs and die when the task is completed. This was the basis for Schopenhauer's pessimism, he was pessimistic about it. But his pessimism is not an attitude or temperament, it is a life of constant inquiries. This is a philosophical conclusion based on reason. Individuals are mere expressions of infinite will, essentially nothing. Humans are often cut down by bacteria at low stature, genius can be fooled by a slight physiological imbalance, millions of people slaughtered by tyrant hands, their bodies are insects It is burned like. Arthur Schopenhaur is also known as "vanity of life". He felt that almost all human religion, and general metaphysics, denied it. Even religions such as Christianity and Buddhism are aware of the world suffering and evil, and their teachings usually cover it optimistically. The inevitable devastating idea filled everyone with fear, and the distortion of religion was an attempt by nervous people trying to release us from our destiny. However Schopenhaur insists that death is certainly an illusion; death is nothing but the collapse of individual organisms, and individuals are mere phenomena, not the ultimate reality. Individuality and identity are fancy, they are not real, so how can they die? But the intention to transcend space and time is eternal and can not be destroyed. Death is not a single eventual event, it is a process from birth, which is unique to all organisms.

Life and way of life If you want to believe in liberal philosophers like Sartre, they choose to live a life, saying that we have their own destiny and free will, You should. What standards must be followed and what should be achieved in order to live a complete and fulfilling life. These questions are questions that the next group of philosophers must answer when discussing their different views on what we do in the world. Philosophers like Kant believe that goodwill is the only unconditional in our life Responsibility leads us and is an important part of our goodwill. Of course, the best way to live a good life is to live a good life. But how do you live a good life? Different views on what constitutes a good life do not seem to converge in the same direction as consensus. Still, most people admit that there is a tendency to think that good life should be a meaningful life and is fair. A view on the better life in the West and the East has a continuity of "meaningful life". These two views do not necessarily have the same principles as a way to live meaningfully, but serving other people brings more meaning to our lives and ultimately brings happiness People believe. In fact, recent neurobiology studies have confirmed that giving aid results in a positive psychological result than receiving aid. We are here to send a meaningful life. There are various opinions on the purpose of life, but it seems that living a meaningful life is what most people think is the purpose of life. But the most interesting questions are: How do you get there? Through psychology from philosophy to religion, there is a treasure trove of this viewpoint. However, it seems that more and more discussions tend to be as follows. Influence others and serve. When discussing this issue with my friend on last night's discussion platform, our aim was to leave a legacy leaving behind a sign on the earth. All of this seems to require you to decide what you want to do, then do it with all your heart and affect the lives of people. As far as we can help, the number of people we influence and the nature of the service is not a problem. Find your passion and use it to help others and actively influence their lives Every aspect of your life will affect every aspect of your life. So the way you do something is how you do everything. This is easy to understand for those who remove everything from annoying life. In order to truly achieve this principle, your daily life and normal life can be satisfied with just what is really important for you. When your age is filled with core elements meaning the world for you - and you are successful in these fields - you will dominate all areas of your life. To do this, it must be aggressive rather than aggressive. In this case, whenever the world judges you, whenever the world doubts you, whenever you pierce your back and all shadows, add all rejections so as not to forget it . Keep moving forward, remember the reasons for your core competence and development and implementation - your goal before you finally bid Adieu into the world

Plato, an ancient Greek philosopher (BC 428 - 347), quotes "Music Center". Plato believes concerts played in different modes will cause different emotions. [2] What is very old is the relationship between music and mind. It dates back to the Veda era, which attempts to relate the basic sound of "7" of music to the basic emotion of "8" confirmed in Indian drama theory. The basic seven notes are Sadaja, Rishaba, Gandhara, Madiyama, Panchama, Da Vata and Nishada, but the basic eight emotions are Slinger (Love), Hasha (Lol), Carna (Empathy), Villa (Heroism ), Raudra (anger), bhayanaka (fear), bibhatsa (aversion) and adbhuta (miracle). Love and laughter are related to memo of madhyama and panchama, anger of sadaja and rishaba, miracle and heroism, sympathy of nishada and gedaro, and to the aversion and fear of dhaibata. [3] More interesting is the relationship between "raga" and "rasa". "Raga" is expressed as "arrangement of special sounds that looks like a decoration for sound and melody movement to appeal to the soul". [3] This forms the basic melody structure of Indian classical music as well as basic. Form the "format tower" instead of the total of the notes. On the other hand, "Lhasa" is said to "react to the psychological reaction and reverberation of the person listening to music." It is thought to represent a "primary and reactive" mood. [4] Fun is the final product of all art forms, the concept of "rasa" represents the abstract meaning of "element" or "essence" in Upanishad language, in particular Brivan Dragnak-Upanishad, while in Taittariya Upanishad, "rasa "The ultimate reality is," This is the basis of "Ananda", the state of maximum happiness. [Five] Since raga is similar to the concept of "ancient Greek" harmoniai ", it is similar to" ethos "which is expressed in the same culture or similar phenomenon especially in the Western Renaissance and baroque music of" Affectnlehre "at the end of the 19th century [6 ]. Period [4] This thesis establishes the relationship between art and science's isolated field, in particular the relationship between music and psychiatry. A similar model was proposed to link heavy metal music to bipolar disorder, a mental disorder. Metal music consists of various subcategories with various songs, rhythms, instruments, and vocal structures. These symptoms are similar to symptoms of bipolar disorder, especially (low) manic recurrence and depression. Examples of songs indicating these analogies are given. In addition to establishing a subjective connection between knowledge of apparently irrelevant fields, these analogies can also play a clear role in disease and psychiatric disorders in clinical applications and education. This article combines music and psychosis symptoms, especially heavy metal music and bipolar disorder in a similar model. Events like comprehensive symptomology of bipolar disorder can lead to emotional settings and reality perception experienced only by troubled patients. It is a realistic form in which sensations and perceptions of healthy people can not be used. Philosophically, the emotional state during the episode of mental illness is the phenomenology of the patient (perceivable reality), a healthy individual ontology (invisible reality). The emotional state experienced during the episode is not just the sum of the individual symptoms. It includes emerging phenomena that can be figuratively anthropomorphized among imaginative creatures, and in the sense of Kant it can be said to be in the form of an unknown and controversial 'self-contained' I guess. Irrespective of observation

It is estimated worldwide that millions of animals are raised and killed each year from drugs to floor cleaners and creams. The nine reasons why misuse, mishandling, and atrocity are using biological instruments as laboratory equipment on World Animal Day (April 24) are as follows. In the UK, the use of rats in monkeys, dogs, rats and experiments is legal - although they are regulated Since we differ from other species in terms of physiology, biochemistry, metabolism etc, it is difficult to obtain results from animal experiments and apply them reliably to humans. Even if you judge your ideas in any way it is a mistake to make lonely lives in the laboratory cage and let them experiment with bad pain. Animal experiments on cosmetics and cosmetics have been banned in the UK for a long time As of March 2013, the EU as a whole prohibited the sale of cosmetics tested for animal ingredients - a big step forward. Unfortunately, in some countries such as China, all companies selling cosmetics need to pay for movable products. This means that some companies that were not cruel for years have begun to test their animals to turn their ethical policy back into the favorable market. Non-animal research methods such as human-based trace dosing, in vitro technology, human patient simulator, computer modeling, etc. can also be used Rat - with the mouse, is the most commonly used animal in the experiment - it is a very intelligent and social animal It lies between good science and bad science - between methods directly related to humans and methods not directly related to humans. It is time to switch to test methods other than humanized, effective and contemporary animals that do not cause animal suffering and give hope for effective medical care. Dr. Vernon Coleman has identified eight moral dilemmas to resolve when countering the value of animal experiments, why animal experiments must be stopped at the 1991 Animal Exhibition Exhibition. Firm response before and after. The book he also identified eight major medical / scientific arguments about animal experiments and provided a convincing and fully documented argument on objections. The jury believes that the biological systems of non-human and human animals are different. They react not only to the chemical being tested but also to common foods. It is a strong argument that these results can not be reasonably inferred from one to the other, and Hans Reusch 's important work in 1982 "Naked Empress" or Great Medical Fraud (Great Medical Fraud (Page 13) Animal pain is a legitimate problem in the UK, but the world is full of problems, human problems must be done first! It sounds nice, but all animals asked me to wear animal fur and leather and stop eating meat. As a vegetarian wearing synthetic materials, I have no reason not to deal with human problems. But does the fact that we can choose to give up on meat for moral reasons point to a significant moral difference between animals and humans? As Kant pointed out, humans are the only moral animals and the only animal that can accept even the concept of "right". For those who can answer it, what's wrong with maintaining ethical considerations? Here, A.M.C. You can enter: moral status of mental retardation, crazy, infant and Alzheimer's patients

Good moral theory requires logical rigor and intuitive appeal to provide effective tools to understand right and wrong. In the field of environmental ethics, there is an important academic research based on the essential value of nature, especially in the development of Paul Taylor. Taylor provided a logically clear argument for protecting the environment by establishing what he calls the concept of biological core (Taylor, 99). This scholarship helps explain what intuitively people understand by the environmentally conscious people, but I noticed that it does not provide a positive answer to what we should live (Cafar). The work of McIntire is only one of the series of contemporary virtues, but it shows many of the strengths and weaknesses of virtue ethics. One of the main advantages of this approach is that it is not a narrow range of choices and actions that are deemed to be in the "moral" field, or considered subjects of mandatory words, but the whole person and the whole life are related to morality Then it is understood. This is more appropriate for our daily prosperity sense - Life is not just right or wrong, it is to integrate all the spheres in our lives that constitute our character (relations with others, Participation in practice and politics, fulfillment of social roles, etc). 6) Ethics provides a central concept of criticism of ethical methods based on moral arguments within the community and between communities, practical and ethical positions, and virtue-based approaches (virtue, practical wisdom and prosperity) Provide resources to enrich. A recent resurgence of virtue ethics in moral philosophy that resonates with existing IR scholars suggests that more attention should come Morality is now widely recognized as an alternative to Kant and the theory of result ethics. However, moral philosophers were late to incorporate ethics into the subject of applied ethics. Furthermore, environmental virtue ethics is an undeveloped field of environmental ethics. Environmental ethics frequently uses moral evaluation (respect, consideration, nature love, etc.) and leads the attraction of role models (Henry Thoreau, Aldreauponto, Rachel Carson etc), but environmental ethics is completely understood Not. Modern virtue ethics research Sandler begins applying virtue ethics to environmental problems, defines "environmental virtues" as virtues corresponding to environmental entities, supports environmental goods or values ​​based on environmental considerations, and / or environmental goods or values. For example, environmental activism virtues will promote environmental goods and value to contribute to "successful access to environmental goods in social and political fields". These qualities include "commitment, familiarization, discipline, focus, insight". , Persistence, creativity, courage, self-discipline, cooperation, patience, unite, perseverance, optimism ... "(p. 49). Virtues of social interactions including miracles react to environmental entities. Wonders provide selfish benefits of excitement, happiness, and satisfaction.

Principle of right and wrong in the field of ethics. The field of medicine has little moral side. For example, there is an ethical problem related to it Hospice care: Should patients take nutrition? What about pre-instruction and resuscitation order? Genetic testing and prenatal testing: What happens if you are a carrier of deficiency? What if a test shows that your newly born baby is defective? When you talk with a doctor, is she hiding ethical information about you or your family? The implementation of medical ethics and medical ethics is a necessary tool to enumerate various ethical and moral propositions and clarify their positions. "... medical ethics is a matter of ethics applied to specific areas of our lives ... medical care ..." (Clouser pp 384). Medical ethics has two functions, one is sensitive. "... This is a career of consciousness, reminding us of the most serious injustice and subtle nuances." (Clouser pp 385) Another is the structure of medical problems. '... This is what I have to do with the medical ethics I mentioned in the second article. This structure is called a problem. The moral clues of complex situations are the foundation. '(Clouser pp 385) The recommendations of experts, doctors and ethicists bring synergistic effects to ethical actors, allowing agents to make decisions. This is justified and ethical. A medical ethicist owns Emanuel Kant, A.J. Foundation foundation The term medical ethics goes back to 1803, when British author and physician Thomas Percival issued a document explaining the medical expert's requirements and expectations at medical institutions. The Code of Ethics was adjusted in 1847 and was highly dependent on the words of Percival. Over the years, the original document was revised in 1903, 1912 and 1947. The practice of medical ethics is widely accepted and practiced all over the world. There are other codes of conduct. Hippocrates' s pledge discussed the basic principles of medical professionals. The document dates back to the 5th century BC. The Helsinki Declaration (1964) and Nuremberg Code (1947) are two well-respected and respected documents that contribute to medical ethics. Other important signs in the history of medical ethics are Roe v. Includes Wade and the development of hemodialysis in the 1960s. Women's reproductive health rights include ethical principles. What is essential to modern medical ethics is the patient's autonomy and basic principles of informed consent. Medical ethics includes the selection of medical professionals and patients, and the responsibilities and responsibilities of medical professionals to patients. In addition, medical ethics includes selection of social development, distribution of supply and medical services, and the resulting problems.

Because each has a different moral philosophy that is subjective, the moral dilemma challenges enterprises. Companies have different moral principles to form a moral atmosphere. The two moral philosophies that influence the way companies deal with ethics are utilitarianism and moral egoism. "Utilitarians are seeking the greatest profit for most people" while minimizing the damage (Ferrell, Fraedrich, & Ferrell, 2011, p. 156). Moral egoism believes that the results are relevant only to individuals "Everyone should pursue only their own interests" (Rachels & Rachels, 2010, p.197). In the field of morality, or moral philosophy, research can systematically describe the theory of what causes correct behavior or wrong behavior. Moral philosophy is usually divided into three categories: meta ethics, applied ethics, normative ethics. Meta-ethics studies our moral value, where language and principles derive; it focuses on "moral?" Rather than "moral". And provide a practical solution to ethical problems. Normology ethics studies ethical standards that affect correctness and tort. The theory of normative ethics includes utilitarianism, consequentialism, contractileism, virtue ethics, and so on. Ethics (also known as moral philosophy) is a philosophical field to solve moral problems. The term "moral" is often used interchangeably as "moral" and sometimes more narrowly used to express the moral principles of a particular tradition, group or individual. Likewise, certain moral theories, especially moral ethics, distinguish ethics from morality. "The morals and ethics of people are the same, but there is a usage that limits morality to institutions such as Emmanuel Kant, based on concepts such as responsibilities, duties, principles, etc. To further advance Aristotle's practical inference approach, Concepts based on virtue often protect ethics and often avoid separating "moral" considerations from other practical considerations.

Why ethics: the purpose of life In our culture, many people are asking the same questions. Why I am better than you Who said that if you think that America is better than any other country, I need to deal with you this way. All these questions come from the same question. What is morality? This question raises another related question: Why is it moral? Even if there is a person (in this article, I mean a person in a general sense, meaning the whole human being) to be a moral creature, he is responsible. Because this problem involves an ethical behavior-oriented core, the convincing reason to provide ethical behavior seems to be critical to those who seriously consider the moral proposition. After all, if you do not know the clear reasons for moral behavior, the moral principles do not influence behavior and discussing them can only be intellectual activities. Therefore, before considering how to apply the ethical framework to modern problems, we provide several reasons to solve these problems using an ethical framework rather than an unethical problem is needed. Kant's explanation on the content of the moral requirement and the nature of the moral reasoning is based on his analysis of his own power of moral consideration as a reason for action. The reason for the moral requirement is that they can not be ignored if they coexist with other considerations. Basic moral requirements hold the power to give reasons in every situation, and they are universally valid. Therefore, regardless of the basic moral requirements, its content is universal. Only universal law can be the content of ethical reasons. This gives Cant a provisional statement: "I should not take action unless my motto can be made a universal law" (G. 4: 402). Kant believes that this is the basic principle of all morals.

David Hume - Response to early criticism of naturalistic meta ethics, political science and psychology David Hume. Based on Houston's "Last Conference" at the bar at Princes Street in Edinburgh, I suggest that Kant and Moore are loyal to the intuitive and cautious basic concept of the traditional ethical ban did. I called this interpretation of Hume's compatibility strategy "naturalism". In what sense is Hume's claim "naturalistic"? I think there are two very different "naturalistic" feelings that can be applied appropriately to the discussion of Hume on freedom and necessity. The first and most important meaning is that it involves applying the experimental reasoning method to this "controversial problem". As we have seen, Hume is interested in explaining the circumstances in which people are responsible (ie explaining the "traditional mechanisms" that create moral sentiments). Thus, Hume's compatibility strategy must be understood in the general context of his efforts to introduce "a method of experimental reasoning for moral subjects". In this article we will focus on two alternative interpretations of Hume's compatibility strategy, the "classical" interpretation and the "naturalistic" interpretation, for a basic comparison. According to the classics, efforts to express the relationship between Hume's moral responsibility requirements and free will will be understood primarily from his view on the conceptual logic of "freedom" and "necessity" You should. . It is said that free and responsible behavior must be triggered by the agent. Therefore, there is no incompatibility between free will and determinism. On the contrary, free and responsible behavior (logically) requires a causal relationship. As so described, Hume's discussion involves (a priori) observations about the logical relationship between the important concepts involved in this controversy. In other words, one of the main goals of Hume is to explain what people are responsible for.

The era of reason is "people who can make you believe ridiculous people will commit atrocities." This short citation is said by famous writers and philosophers Voltaire; others follow this nonsense It is foolish to think about it while. Quotations only experienced Voltaire's wisdom and the world's understanding in the era of validity. The era of reason and enlightenment is defined not only as a change in thinking but also as establishment of value and rational behavior. The enlightenment of French literature in the era of intelligent era and rationalism is the period after the classical era of France in the 1700s. During this time philosophers have focused on rationality as the best way to learn. It explores education, law philosophy and political issues. It attacks tyranny, social injustice, superstition, and ignorance. In this time, progress has been made in the fields of anatomy, astronomy, chemistry, mathematics and physics. - French Neoclassicalism In the 17th century, the era of the King Louis XIV, we saw the era of neoclassical ideals, the three largest masters of France, Corneille, Racine and Molière. With the decline of the religious play in the middle of the 16th century, French play slowly developed. The French Renaissance began in 1630 and ended in 1700 Many critical thinkers believed that religion and reason are hostile in the age of enlightenment in the 17th and 18th centuries. For them, the Middle Ages or the "era of faith" is therefore the opposite of the era of reason. Kant and Voltaire were attacking the Middle Ages as an era of religious decline, and Jimbo in the "History of the decline and decline of the Roman Empire" expressed their contempt for "garbage in the dark ages". But like Petrarch, he saw himself at the cutting edge of the "new era" and criticized it for centuries before his own time, as was the enlightenment writer . The age of reason is the movement of the 18th century where medieval mysticism, religion, superstition continue. In the era of reason, it shows how humans pursue knowledge and the universe by looking at themselves. During this period, the concepts and ideas of actions previously held by humans may be questioned both verbally and in writing; people are afraid of being shown as being infidels and burned. This is the beginning of a free society where individuals freely pursue individual happiness and freedom. In the political and social aspects, the concept of the medieval empire was abandoned. The era of reason includes the shorter period called the era of enlightenment; during this period scientific thinking and exploration experienced tremendous change. New ideas are full of new ideas, people want to explore these ideas freely

Criticism of Parallel Life I watched Parallel Life at the Charles Johnson Theater on April 12, 2002. Before the show began, I was ready to finish. This game is the last game I want to go to this Friday night. At 7:30, the light went off and the music rang. When I was studying the script, I wanted to know who they are, by looking at "Based on Cathy and Mo show." Cathy Najimy participated in the "Sister Act" in 1992, while Mo Gaffney participated in many movies and TV programs. Contemporary 1. What is the "will" compared to the criticism of Heidegger's technology and criticism of Hawk Heimer and Adolno's instrumental rationality? Where are the criticisms divided? What criticism is more convincing? why? Political theory has experienced a revival in the second half of the 20th century. Hannah Arendt, Michael Oakeshott, Leo Strauss, Eric Vogellin are major political thinkers who are believed to contribute to the resurrection. Please select two thinkers and discuss their work. In your opinion, what is the contribution of everyone to modern political theory and how successful is it? Does the Federal government paper present a complete and coherent political philosophy? Discuss your answers to this question in articles that use related concepts and key paragraphs in Publius text. What do you think about this? Are there any differences in true opinion? First, as a critical philosophy, as an ancient practice of Persia, it is not a prescription for political content. However, as in the case of ancient philosophy, criticisms made up its politically relevant reality: "Philosophy should not be used to explain what should be done in politics." Within stable outside relations, politics, this is true "(2010: 354). As Kant did in the French Revolution, philosophy is in doubting the importance of events. Secondly, the role of criticism is "continue to criticize fraud, fraud, hallucinations" (2010: 354). Is Par? Sia's practice of Socrates, the role of philosophy as criticism is to prejudice the prejudice of "common opinion", that is, to think about whether we really know what we know. Criticism is always self-criticism, self-care, and self-management Many of the actual criticisms for "identity politics" rely on the fact that it is atomizing the repressive structure. Many people compare this tendency with neoliberal metaphysics. There, only individuals and military establish causal relationships with these individuals. In either case, there is the power to bring benefits to some people and directly sacrifice others (in liberalism these are genetic privileges and the power of doctrine, neo-liberalism is a strange situation Early formal liberalists believed that it was important to maintain these forces.Theoretically this model eliminated these forces and was suppressed It can improve people's lives.

He was a German philosopher in the late nineteenth century who challenged the foundation of Christianity and traditional morality. He is interested in promoting personal and cultural health and believes in the life, creativity, power and reality of the world we live in. The core of his philosophy is the concept of "life affirmation", which includes a sincere question about all doctrines that deprives the expansion of life, but these views may be universal in society. Nihilism is a belief that refuses all religious and moral principles and claims that life is meaningless in fact. The work of German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche had a great influence on the history of Western philosophy and modern thought, but most of it was related to nihilism. For Nietzsche, in addition to what we give, there is no objective order and structure in the world. "Because the real world does not exist at all, every kind of thing that takes into account every belief, reality thing must be wrong." The idea of ​​meaningless life is not new. Friedrich Nietzsche is one of many philosophers who promoted it. In 1936 Alfred J. Ayer wrote his view that the description of the meaning of life and other philosophical issues is literally meaningless. Existentialists Michael Coronation and Jean - Paul Sartre in the 1940 's declared that life had no existing purpose. The meaning is what everyone wants, but it is not really necessary Master-slave ethics is the central theme of Friedrich Nietzsche's work, in particular the first article of "moral lineage". Nietzsche believes that there are two basic types of morality: "Master Moral" and "Slave Moral". Masters of pride and power of moral value, slavery morality appraises goodness, compassion, compassion. Unlike the morality of slavery, dominant morality measures actions that bring good or bad results (ie classical virtues and vices, resultism), the morality of slavery acts within a range of good malicious images I emphasize (eg virtue and vice of Christianity, Kant morality) On) The long-term assumption about Nietzsche is that he likes to master the morality of slaves. However Nietzsche scholar Walter Kaufman says that Nietzsche's analysis of these two ethics is only for descriptive and historical significance and does not imply any approval or praise, Rejected. On the other hand, it is clear from his own study that Nietzsche is trying to master the victory of morality. He reminded us that "linking human relief with unconditional dominance of dominant morality", "people with higher level values, aristocratic values, people living a correct life, and those who guarantee the future" call. "There is an order between" morality and morality "as well as" there is an order among people ".

For most Western countries, the early 20th century represented the era of social and artistic turmoil and change. Specifically, during the First World War and during the First World War, art culture fundamentally changed to a polar form completely, artists applied new ways, expressiveism, cubism, futurism It represented a new movement. When they are "best", "ready-made", "dada", "surreal" they rely on the same rebellious belief. This rebellion depends on the artist and its interpretation, but in all cases it has the same purpose - inspiring and redefining art, and so-called art. CC: Your criticism against Benjamin and Adorno points out the difference between the understanding of modernity after the Renaissance and the understanding of modernity since 1848. The arts since 1848 are about daily disillusionment, secularization and sanctity, but fundamentally different from the romantic era from the Renaissance art to the Hegel era. On the other hand, this difference depends on the difference between Kant and Hegel, on the other hand it relies on Marx and should not be understood as a difference in thinking. On the contrary, it is a true historical difference between 1848 and the world after 1848, which requires a completely different attitude towards enlightenment, disillusionment, destruction and recurrence. The emergence of modernity emphasizing reason, science, bureaucracy, secularism, has led German sociologist Max Weber to call it "disillusionment of the world". When we are influenced by scientific materialism, myths, ceremonies, and sanctity slowly disagree. From a subjective point of view, science may be able to map neuronal connections and electrical activity in the brain in a very accurate way, but this is irrelevant. We have never experienced synapses that convey electrical signals to other neurons. We experience beauty, love, anger, anxiety, awe, despair, laughter and loss. Our ability to create meanings from this spiritual and emotional "electricity" is important for our happiness. I hate this, but it shows my opinion. Alt-right ideology reveals that their movements are responses to modern morbidity and constitute their rhetoric accordingly. For white Europeans, the way to eliminate enchantments and drift is internal. Culture is inherently moral - a system of intercepted symbols with balanced probation. A community with a broken and iconic system that can not be reintegrated into that subject has no culture. For Freud, the West (especially the United States of America) is characterized by symbolic collapse.

All moral arguments on the existence of God are based on the principle that we all share a common morality. Because there is a magical argument for the existence of God, in spite of people, broadly speaking, cultural differences around the world, because there is something wrong there, what is right there, It will say that such understanding is to prove the existence of God. Kant raises this argument (argument which is not moral), as a source of god objective morality. First, he talked about absolute commands. Our own sense of responsibility, morality is an example of this principle, to obey, for example, to repay your debt. It is useful for objective evidence of God's understanding to exist, explaining before the existence of God and trying to evaluate moral arguments. Of course, this view is varied, but the most contemporary advocate in this view has a theistic argument, so "proof I do not think that it is an attempt to try to provide reasonable arguments and assumptions that a reasonable person can not deny. Standards such as achievement of success obviously set very high standards, supporters of theistic argument is a logical philosophical argument in fields other than logical formal argument, an interesting conclusion that almost can not fulfill that standard Did. Is the premise of these arguments reasonable, at least for reasonable people, more reasonable than rejection? The moral argument for the existence of God constitutes a specific function from diverse family arguments, moral or ethical living to the existence of God, which is usually understood as a creator of good moral universe doing. Moral argument is important and interesting. They evaluate the robustness that they need to pay attention to almost all important philosophical issues that should deal with meta ethics, so they are interesting. They are important because they occupy an important position for public defense of religious beliefs in the demo. This evidence can be found in the amazing popular C · S · Lewis of "Pure Christianity" (1952), which almost certainly began a moral debate for the existence of God in the 20th century It is a proof of a bestselling book. Many ordinary people believe that religion provides the foundation and foundation of morality to some extent.

Merck's case study fact Facts: Merck is one of the world's largest pharmaceutical companies. Merck is to lose the patent protection of the two best-selling drugs, which accounts for the majority of the annual turnover of $ 2 billion. Merck invested millions of dollars in research (up to $ 1 billion) and within three years Merck discovered four powerful medicines. Merck does not care about profits; the founder of Merck believes as follows. I will detail the three ethical theories and analyze Merck's case based on each theory and summarize how the authors and supporters of each theory position it in this case. The three theories used in case studies are John Stuart Mill's Utilitarian ethical theory, Immanuel Kant's moral theory's best subject, and Voice of Care for Kant and Mills. Contemporary Challenges of Mainstream Ethics Merck researchers have discovered ways to treat river dysfunction caused by parasites and carried by fly. And it had a negative effect on many people in the third world countries. After testing drugs to improve safety through clinical trials, the company tried to sell drugs through information sources like the World Health Organization and several US health agencies. Merck known as Merck Sharp & Dohme outside the United States and Canada did not address the safety issues of EMA. However, clinical trials are in compliance with "laws, regulations, guidelines", and it happens no matter where it occurs only after approval by regulatory bodies and ethics committees. The company also emphasized: "A new medical history is collected every study visit, it is essential for all subjects, a new medical history also includes collection of non-serious adverse events." E - mail tells the inspector that inspection data is available. The company succeeded in attracting institutions with previously approved discussions. "The applicant found that collecting new historical data is essential for all subjects and does not seem to be passively collected, but found to be relieved at each study visit," EMA said.

The first semester has ended, and the grades of your teenagers are also there. You are very surprised and disappointed with their transcripts. How is your child? Let's guess your first reaction. You are ready to accept advice and study plans. Your anger may also make you consider punishment Do not talk to Jones Rooney, a mother who is helping Princeton's online homework. "Young people are in places where they must begin their own assessment and analysis." Instead, she suggests leading a question. For example, "What do you think is going well, and what can be improved?" Once you have identified some of the reasons they are struggling at school, you can provide a solution to help them brainstorm. Ideally, you want to encourage them to use their own support system and familiar tools. So, for example, if you forget to start allocating enough time, you can add an alarm to your phone, set a goal with friends, and bear responsibility for others I will. "You want to help them learn to independently reflect the problem and learn to solve, this is life skills," Rooney pointed out. Of course, not to mention teenagers (in fact, everyone), but if they design their own solutions, they are more likely to have a solution. "Results may be observed, but in the long run, you will not help them," she said. And she added, please do not expect a miracle. "Because they are unlikely to go from zero to 100, let's celebrate any success you can find." High school teenagers want to adapt to the effects of change, delay, study habits, sleeping habits, and becoming high school students, so it is difficult to switch from high school to high school. Because young people are afraid of failure, they are suffering from change. The feeling of losing control usually involves a change (Kant). The transition from middle school to high school is a big change. High school students will be more free and teachers will no longer allow the students to determine the particular method best suited to their brain's way of synthesizing the presented information. The environment studied also affects productivity and work quality. Attitudes are an important factor fighting the delay. To acquire a quick attitude to maintain a healthy learning habit can help students understand how to cope with many other tasks in different situations. High school may be a very interesting time for many teenagers. This is a very interesting time, it is a very difficult time. Emily White's "Secret Life in High School" counts the daily social interactions of many struggling teenagers in the outskirts of Seattle. Most of this article is used to explain the social situation of Capellia. Emily explains the cafeteria as a social "testing place" for students (page 15). White's view of observing and explaining these daily exchanges is that high schools may find it difficult to test their identity. For students, the appearance of friends you think may be destroyed immediately, depending on the lunch break you are in. page). The description of the life of these students sounds very difficult, but accurate for many dangerous high school students. In these tribes, the identity of everyone has been highly questioned.

Rousseau has many thoughts on how society as a whole should function. His point is about those who demand freedom. With this freedom, we do not theoretically compare ourselves, or try to improve ourselves better than others. His other key ideas include the notion of general will and collective sovereignty. These show that society and the government should enjoy common wishes and work together as a coherent unit. Rousseau has several famous books, one of which is a social contract. From the 18th century to the 19th century, the most important elements of political idealism were the contract theory of John Rock and Jean-Jacques Rousseau, as well as the thinkers of Adam Smith, Jeremy Bentham, John Stuart Mill It appeared in liberalism philosophy. These thinkers have created idealists called political liberalism. Liberalism emphasizes that consensus is the basis for legitimate political authority and it is a limited constitutional government as the basis for human rights. As liberalism dominates contemporary political and economic theory, international relativists often define the idealistic tradition as liberalism. Liberalism has many forms and derivatives, but those core concepts meaningful to life can be traced back to three main points. Early thinkers such as John Locke, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Adam Smith, etc. started with human beings in nature, found meanings of existence through labor and property, and used social contracts to create an environment supporting these efforts It was. Kantism is a philosophy based on Immanuel Kant's ethics, epistemology and metaphysical writings. Kant is known for his moral theory, and there is a moral obligation, a "classification order" arising from the concept of responsibility. Kantian believes that all actions are done in accordance with basic maxims and principles, and that they must be ethical and must abide by absolute orders. Jean-Jacques Rousseau was born in 1712 as the son of independent Calvinism city Geneve, Isaac Rousseau, Suzanne Bernard. Rousseau's mother died on 9th birthday, Rousseau grew up from his father and received education until he was ten years old. Isaac Rousseau is a minority ethnic group of residents of Geneva and enjoys the status of the citizen of Geneva which is the position of Jean-Jacques. According to the story after Rousseau, the random education he received from his father included planting the Republican patriotism and reading a classical writer like Pultak dealing with the Roman Republic. After his father exiled in the city to avoid arrest, Jean - Jacques was taken care of by a nearby Bossi pastor, followed by apprenticeship sculptures. Mme de Warens made Rousseau arrange a trip to Turin and convert it to Roman Catholic in April 1728.

Freedom is defined as the need for choice and action, compulsion, lack of constraint. In the Indian situation in India, Joseph Chiefs called for freedom. Martin Luther King's "I dream" The speech is seeking freedom. The text written by Joseph and the golden chief has many similar philosophies as the two cultures embodied in text are faced with similar circumstances. Chief Joseph represents a group of native Americans trapped in land without greed. There are two kinds freely. Freedom (negative freedom) and freedom (positive freedom). The division of freedom into this binary framework can be traced back to Kant, which he at least described in detail in his 1941 work "Escape from Freedom" at Isaiah Berlin's 1958 paper "Two Freedoms". It is known for concepts and explores Charles Taylor more modernly. These philosophers and thinkers often use these two different freedoms to discuss and discuss the role of government in civic life. But today, we would like to explore ways to think about the difference between freedom and freedom. It will help us to better understand our personal development and travel from boys to men. Freedom is the driving force of peace. Freedom of selection freedom of movement. Freedom of thought Free innovation You can freely talk and communicate. Our project aims to protect these liberties by widely disseminating friends and transferring ownership of technology to users themselves. This platform provides a tool choice for all users to use in every travel place. A tool to conceptualize ideas. They can build their own applications online and distribute them in seconds. You can communicate using powerful instant messaging and peer-to-peer video conferencing software that anyone on the Internet can use. They can do all of this on any computer with unpacking from all the devices, with internet connection This freedom comes with requirements. Freedom needs to contact the system that keeps it while recognizing that all companions do not like the freedom you enjoy. Sometimes, freedom needs voting, sometimes it needs to be promoted, sometimes it needs to be opposed, and sometimes it needs to be protested. In the response of last year it is now even bigger and many Americans think this is an attack on our tribe. After all, we are a DNA tribe. Our tribal nature has helped us defeat furry mammoths and Nazis, and our tribal members turning our backs are deep individuals of our identity We are criticizing threateningly and threateningly. Therefore, we are aware of the fact that all social injustices began to defend the tribe loudly, and keeping silent about trying to weaken the voice that Kaepernick and other tribes can not recognize the most uncommon things watch. Synonyms of what he called "non-patriotic" and removed from tribes

From a Utilitarian point of view it seems easy to kill people and save millions of lives. But since I dismiss resultantism, I think that it is not enough to morally kill the very ideal result, so I would like to unite with Kant 's framework. The President has elected to kill millions of people and choose to distinguish him from innocent people, that moral reasoning can prove his death and lead people to some form of retaliation It is right for a doctor to kill the president because he wants. What? Resultualism and outcome not moral structuralism and non-resultivism are the two main concepts in moral research. Although results-oriented or "scopos theory" theory focuses on results, non-resultivism or "moral theory" theory does not care about results. The resultant's view is based on two major ethical theories, including moral egoism and utilitarianism. These theories agree that human behavior and behavior should produce favorable results. Moral theories are generally divided into three types: i) resultant theory focusing on the ethical impact of specific actions; ii) widely in the intentions of people who make ethical decisions about specific behaviors Non-result theory tends to focus. Unlike results theory and non-reactive theory, agent-centered theory pays more attention to the overall moral status of individuals and agents, and does not pay much attention to the morality of specific actions. Each of these three categories contains a variety of ethical methods, some of which have characteristics common to each category. Here are some of the most important and useful examples of these ethical approaches. The deterrence theory is often classified as a variant of the resulting punishment theory. Consensus theory is trying to prove that punishment is the best way to achieve a particular independent identifiable product (eg Bentham 1823; J. Wilson 1983; Walker 1991; legal penalty entry also reference). Various resultant theories describe the final benefit or goods to which all our actions are directed, but the most reasonable direct benefit that the penal system can bring is to reduce crime. For this reason, in the result-based theory, it is common to argue that punishment can reduce crime by deterring, slandering, or transforming a potential criminal. In particular, deterrence theory claims that punishment can serve a dual purpose: to prevent malicious or illegal acts of an individual (his or her own) punished in the future and to prevent others from doing similar behaviors To prevent taking things.

As Dante Alighieri lived, the medieval era was era of instability and corruption. Dante wrote this terrible time as he wanted to express hate to the current leader. In Inferno, he explained this unethical community vividly by using influential people who violated the law. In addition, the image used by Dante of Hell shows the relationship between the sin on the ground and the severe punishment which depicts a vivid image emotionally related to the church. In addition, the orthodox of Dante expresses ridicule. Because the church always expresses a contradictory church because it does not always clearly explain the position of multiple sinners. The image is a literary device that uses vivid explanations to appeal to the reader's sensation, and the author often uses it to attract viewers and push it into the fictional world. For Dante 's creator of Inferno, Dante Alighieri, this image is a discreet expression of figurative hell. By appealing to every sensation using the image, Alighieri created a vivid and painful hell. The main character, Dante, has to go through it. In the novel, the regular image enhances the terrible shine of the terrible hell consumed by Dante. In Dante Alighieri The Inno, perceived by The Inferno, the poet Dante Alighieri emphasizes perception; through sight, the pilgrim Dante can recognize and learn his experience in hell. Since pilgrim Dante is often attracted to a specific image, vision plays an important role in work. The sight of the sinner carries Dante, as a result the sinner is attracted to Dante and Virgil. It seems that Dante is observing everything Avoid the pain of hell. The famous Italian poet Dante Alighieri writes about the physical depiction of hell and the punishment of all sinners against their sins. The comedy of God records the journey of Dante from the depth of hell to the glory of heaven, but it contains a deeper meaning. Through his motif, interaction with sinners, and other literary works and hell combinations, Dante reveals the true meaning of hell. "Inferno's Kant 18's Dante Alighieri's iterative theme, Marcel Proust once said that Rao us ..." A trip to explore wisdom through wild is happening at The Inferno of Dante Alighieri. Inferno is the first part of a trilogy called epic, god comedy. Inferno talks about the narrator

Assuming that animals save their lives, it is assumed that the family is sick and the doctor announces that they are trying to find a cure for animal studies. Then it tests whether animals will be accepted by new drugs and treatments, even though it means that the animals will die. This is a controversial issue, and there are many differences as to whether animal experiments are good or bad. The majority of animal studies, however, are devoted to finding curses of human diseases. In other words, animal experiments save time and labor for animal experiments and are useful for investigating the cause of causes, treatment, birth defects, abnormalities and treatments. It guarantees that the product has been thoroughly tested and can be used safely. It is an ugly fact that animals are killed. But survivors are part of the essence of each animal. As humans evolve, we have created a new way to ensure survival. Testing is not about killing life but about saving lives. No matter how rude and savage it is, it must be a means to achieve the purpose. P & G scientists will ask questions: Is human beings suitable for testing animals to save lives? The proposed rule is that a person can have the right to examine animals to save lives and have the right to do so. So if we generalize rules: humans can accept tests and animal experiments to save human lives. In addition, German philosopher Emmanuel Kant thinks that goodwill has the basic value is the only good. Because animals do not have any will, they are not good faith; therefore they have no fundamental value. Therefore, animal trials are ethical because they can save lives. By testing life-saving medicines and processes, animal testing helps find ways to help save animals and human lives. Animals tend to respond like humans in response to certain diseases and allergies. This will help scientists find ways to treat certain diseases by studying these animals. Open heart surgery, coronary artery bypass surgery, heart transplantation is part of the procedure taken by experimenting with a dog. Insulin for diabetes, life saving antibiotics, etc. have been prepared by experiments in animals. Due to the vaccine made in animal experiments, infections such as smallpox, measles, varicella, rubella, polio, rabies, mumps and colds are suppressed.

This "classical slave narration" is a series of stories including historical slavery experience in the lives of ex-slave Harriet Jacobs, Frederick Douglas and Oulu d'Italiano. They are all trying to protect themselves from some of the slavery fears such as sexual abuse, insult, imprisonment, assault, torture, murder, lack of citizenship and human rights in the United States. Besides, their enthusiastic wisdom and wisdom liberated them for all oppressed people from slavery freedom and freedom and freedom struggle. The classic slave tale is a collection of various authors who personally experienced slavery. Writers like Frederick Douglas, Prince Mary, Harriet Jacobs brought their experiences, and they themselves explained themselves what they are. Freedom was found. Through stories, differences in region and gender have had a great impact on the treatment of slavery. - immortality, monsters, shame, calamity, power, and courage are all legends aspects of the epic of Beowulf and Gilgamesh. Although they exist in two completely different historical times, these magnificent heroes have many similarities and differences. For example, they are regarded as magnificent heroes, but their mortality rate is not the same. Beowulf has superhuman qualities like the power of 30 people, but that is fatal The struggle between the Lord and Stakes reappeared in history. According to Nietzsche, the society of ancient Greece and Rome was based on moralism. Homer's hero is a strong will and the classic roots of Iliad and Odyssey reflects the skill of Nietzsche. He called these heroes "people of noble culture" and provided examples of morals of his master. Historically, the morals of Judaism and Christian slavery were beaten during the Roman Empire. The morality of the master-slave is the central theme of Friedrich Nietzsche's work, especially the first article of "moral lineage". Nietzsche believes that there are two basic types of morality: "dominant morality" and "slave morality". Mastering the pride and power of moral value, slavery morality appraises goodness, compassion, compassion. Unlike the morality of slavery, morality of ethics measures good or bad outcome behavior (ie classical virtue and vice, resultism) and the morality of a slave weighs the behavior of a good malicious image (Example: Christian's virtue and vice, Kant morality)

Paper proposal - genocide may be blocked. Introduction - The meaning of genocide and its impact on individuals and society. - Let's start with interesting facts about the war in Bosnia and Herzegovina - information on the major players involved in war and genocide - discuss wartime / regional interests and religious conflicts. Article - It stipulates that genocide can be avoided if there is UN intervention. - What is the reason for the lack of intervention? For most people who wish to prevent genocide, the key variable of genocide is the lack of political will for people who have the power to stop genocide. Sure thing, for example, if we declare that policy that the United States will intervene in military force in situations where "experts" tell us about the imminent massacre, it will prevent all genocide It is possible to do. From the viewpoint of social science, it is not enough to mitigate the failure of preventing genocide as "amorphous variable" of "lack of political will". This interpretation imagines what is called "political will" that uses all the power of the present age and changes its history according to its order. I missed the central point that the failure of political will itself can be explained by every aspect of contemporary culture listed in this article. It is much more complicated Lymekin's understanding of genocide as a step towards prevention is still an integral part of the theoretical and practical aspects of genocide research projects. The idea of ​​preventing genocide is impossible until this phenomenon is named and understood in several important ways. In the subsequent mass genocide debate, there were rarely cautious studies apart from preventive discourse. Whether it is the name of the work or the text itself, impulsivity means direct prevention, and prevention is regarded as an ideal ideal for ideal exploration. This progress is evident in pioneer work in the study of genocide like Leo Cooper. This is simply to turn Kant's concept of permanent peace into a massacre. Kant wants a society without warfare, Cooper wants to build a society without genocide. Each is a utopian vision

Praise to the main role of Pope Belinda's "Rape of Rape" in the Rape of the Pope can be regarded as a welcome and curse from the boss, but the complexity and sometimes contradictions of Belinda lit a more fair view I will. The advent of Belinda and the world she lives in are explained in a very fantastic and beautiful way. Even details like Belinda's hair arrangement result from a wonderful entity called Sylphs. Its only work is to make her look best. In Kant III of Pope Alexander's "Rape of Rape", the Pope was talking about Belinda's director about less fighting epics. "Belinda is now a person aspiring to become famous, only the adventurous knight, / Ombre, decides their misfortune; and / and inflicts her breasts in future conquests" (III .25-8). The Pope gave Belinda the power to command the army to direct the fight between major players. If we regard this part as an example of women's power and control, we can not ignore the importance of what actually happens. The Pope does not believe that all women are stupid and can not fulfill their duties, but his overall view on women is negative in "Rape of Rape". Understanding of the characteristics of the Pope's female is greatly affected by social recognition. That is, women are inferior tools for men. Praise to the main role of Pope Belinda's "Rape of Rape" in the Rape of the Pope can be regarded as a welcome and curse from the boss, but the complexity and sometimes contradictions of Belinda lit a more fair view I will. The advent of Belinda and the world she lives in are explained in a very fantastic and beautiful way. Even details like Belinda's hair arrangement result from a wonderful entity called Sylphs. Its only work is to make her look best. Pope Alexander's epic "gun of rape" is essentially a sarcastic of traditional epic literature. It is filled with the main character Belinda's behavior, Homer's Achilles, Virgil's Eneid and Greek myth. Unlike Homer's role of Iliad's Achilles, her character's image is portrayed as unrelated to vanity, but he is full of anger and pride as well as Belinda's character. But this is where most of the corresponding attributes end; both scales as magnificent performance are far from similar.

Hegel distinguishes the four types of reflection history from universal, practical, critical, and professional. "Universal" history covers for a long time and attempts to explain, for example, the whole person or the whole country. This sort of history is extensive and represents general facts, and historian's own understanding has influenced his report, so it is hurt by Hegel's view. When talking about how to report about the history of historians, Mr. Hegel said, "The main content here is that his spirituality by historians is an explanation of closer historical materials - this is different from the spirit. Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (commonly known as G. W. F. Hegel or Georg Hegel) (1770 - 1831) was an early German philosopher. He was the leader of German idealist movement in the early 19th century and his idea far exceeded the early Kantism, but he established his own Hegelian school. He is known as "modern Aristotle" and he uses his dialectic system to explain the whole history of philosophy, science, art, politics and religion. Hegel is often thought of as a culmination of the German thought of the early 19th century despite the concealment and the claim of "false philosophy". German philosophy has had a wide range of influences during the century. German idealists such as members of Johann Gottlieb Fichte, Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph Schelling, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, and Jena Romanticism (Friedrich Hölderlin, Novalis, Karl Wilhelm Friedrich Schlegel) have made Kant's work So the reasonable or spiritual process is well known. Arthur Schopenhauer considers this process of forming the world as an unreasonable intention to live and influences ideas like Friderich Nietzsche's work from the 19th century to the early 20th century. The German philosophy classically established by Gottfried Leibniz 's contribution to rationalism, Immanuel Kant' s Enlightenment Philosophy, Johann Gottlieb Fichte, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, and Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph Schelling is historically important. German idealism, formation of metaphysical pessimism of Arthur Schopenhauer, formation of communism theory by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, contribution of Gottlob Frege to the development of Friedrich Nietzsche, the dawn of analytic philosophy Martin Heidegger's existence theory, Oswald Spengler Historical philosophy, Max Horkheimer, Theodor Adorno, Herbert Marcuse, Jürgen Habermas have a special influence on the development of the Frankfurt school.

Because of their self-transcendence, humans are continually improving themselves. The purpose of this process is to achieve an immortal soul. According to Plato, in order to achieve this goal, an individual must first participate in his educational theory: the cave fable, then the metaphor of the parting line, and then the use of formal theory. To fully immerse in this process, you need to understand the allegory of Plato's cave. Moses Mendelssohn's Phaedon is a simple and immortal soul defense. This is a series of three dialogues that Socrates insists on the immortality of the soul and rethinks the platonic dildo paedo preparing for his own death. Many philosophers including Protino, Descartes, Leibniz believe that soul is simple. It is because we can not break simplicity. In Phaedon, Mendelssohn solved the gap in the early version of this discussion (Kant is called the Achilles tendon of rationalist psychology). Phaedon contains a primitive argument about the simplicity of the soul, and it is also a primitive argument that can also not suddenly disappear. It includes a further original argument that the soul must maintain its reasonable ability as long as it exists Therefore, even if it is especially Homer, the first one is the greatest poet and the poet is not good for the immortal human soul and must be defeated. Like an ashes of immortality. ) But in the last satire, Socrates talked about the posthumous world, and a new myth about the rewards and punishments waiting for us - a poetic story about the soul beyond the journey of death . Heritage I already know it in a conversation. Homer seems to be unable to be expelled after all. Socrates proves the immortality of the soul by asserting that the absolute form does not co-exist with their opponents: the soul gives life and the opposite of life is death, so the soul does not recognize death, and Therefore it is immortal. The soul is immortal, but it must be looked after in life and forever - the only thing escaping from evil is getting better and better. "Everyone who lived in purity and clarity is enjoying guidance with God's colleagues." Socrates explained his theory of the earth. If the earth is spherical it is in the middle of the sky (ether) and there is no need to ensure that the earth does not fall off when it is suspended in equilibrium. It's huge, plenty of empty places, water, fog, and air are gathered. Although ordinary people actually live, we mistakenly believe that we live on the surface.

Controversy over factory agriculture in Alastair Norcross's paper "Puppies, Pigs and Men: Eating Cases of Meat and Fringe" He explained men 's Fred losing chocolate taste due to cars. Coincident possibility But it is well known that forced puppies produce coconut ketone. This is a hormone that Fred needs to enjoy chocolate again. Since no one had entered the cocoa amine business, Fred made 26 cubes of puppies, hurt them and caused cocoa amine to be generated in the brain. Eat factory - meat on farm. Explain the main argument of Alasdair Norcross on why it is morally wrong to eat meat on the factory farm. Then explain what Kant is based on this argument, what Epicurean is based for this argument, and how Norcross reacts to them. Evaluate next: what do you agree with (if any) and why? Do you think that it is ethically acceptable to eat meat raised in the factory? Controversy over factory agriculture in Alastair Norcross's paper "Puppies, Pigs and Men: Eating Cases of Meat and Fringe" He explained men 's Fred losing chocolate taste due to cars. Coincident possibility But it is well known that forced puppies produce coconut ketone. This is a hormone that Fred needs to enjoy chocolate again. - The satirical animal farm of George Orwell expresses the concept of autonomy through animals. Animals thus play a role of human beings, using most human characteristics, if not all. Since animals are determined to manage a farm, they constitute a lifestyle called animalism. All animals have to be treated equally and no animals can acquire human characteristics. Objections against factory agriculture are very strong: few people can protect unnecessary suffering. When I think about the moral aspect of eating meat, I am nostalgic to imagine humans as being part of the natural world of life - animals kill each other to survive. Korsgaard cast several important questions: if animals eat meat is unnatural? How do you know? What if a growing population could eat meat through agriculture at the factory? Can I imagine myself as a natural connection of the life chain if there is no way to naturally improve or eat food? If people think their food procurement method is immoral, do they have a moral obligation to not eat it?

A few months ago, the democratic country of Jordan read articles in the magazine. This made me very angry, so I was almost angry. This article was written by a young woman living in Jordan, Norma Khouri. She is 25 years old enough to live my life and make my own decision, but I can not do that. Norma comes from a family of ambitionless middle-class families whose parents go beyond marriage. Norma and her best friend, Dalia, are eager to look for work on their own and are keen to succeed. Thomas Jefferson, "Declaration of Independence" Barbara Jordan, "Keynote Lecture by the Democratic National Convention in 1976" Statement on Impeachment Terms "" Emmanuel Kant '"," Punitive Right "is Metaphysical Edward M. Kennedy from Morality," Pistol Control Need ", John F. Kennedy," First Speech ", Martin Luther King, Jr," I am dreaming ", Martin Luther King, Jr. "Barbara Kingsolver," Our flag still exists "Charles Krauthammer," legalization? No.Reslamorize.Lewis H. Lapham "," Notebook: New Patriotism - Women Voters Alliance ". Jordan's talent as a speaker continues to contribute to her national image. In 1976, she became the first woman and the first African-American keynote speaker at the Democratic National Convention. After a speech by Ohio State Senator John Glenn, Jordan attended her speech. "We are a person seeking a national community," she told the delegation, "We have achieved our citizens' goals and that we all create and maintain an equal society. Government system , But we can run this system and find a new way to achieve our fate. "From the historical point of view of the 200th anniversary of 12 countries, as a result of the Vietnam War and the Watergate incident, Jordan Message, a sound resonating with her command Americans On July 25, 1974, Texas Democratic Party Barbara Jordan made a 15-minute TV speech before the House of Representatives Board of Defense supported the impeachment procedure. Jordan's statement on the impeachment provision was regarded as one of the highest speech of the 20th century and gained national recognition of Jordan from his words, morals and wisdom. Democratic representative of Alabama, Conservative Democratic Party Walter Richie is considered to oppose impeachment. After a long struggle, the ulcer relapsed, and the flower said he would vote for impeachment. From the country that supported Nixon in 1972, he was thought to be influential. There are also Republican members. He asked the committee to the undecided Republicans, "This is what we can not get rid of, now we have to deal with it.

Traditional and Utilitarian Approach in Euthyphro 's Dilemma In Euthyphro, Plato states even the main cyclical processes between Socrates and Euthyphro, even self - religious prophets and devoutes, and even the essence of faith. God itself. The problems raised in this dialogue have been reinterpreted and extended even in the modern theological framework, so the central problem has just been called "Euthyphro's dilemma" ... This is based on Socrates. . The dilemma of Euthyphro was raised in Plato dialogue between Socrates and Euthyphro. In this scene, when Socrates raised a dilemma, Socrates and Euthyphro were talking about the essence of godliness. The dilemma of Euthyphro allows behavior to be a good reaction for God to order actions or to order God to act. If you choose the first one, it means that the command of God must be good: even if he orders someone to exert pain, that pain must be moral . If the latter is chosen, morality no longer depends on God, but it breaks God's command theory. In addition, if God is bound by external law, he will not be sovereign or omnipotent, it will challenge the orthodox concept of God. Plato's meditation on God's command theory can be found in his dialogue Euthyphro. The reasons for suffering Euthyphro are as follows. "Is God morally good so that you can order morally good things or do you morally do good to be commanded from God?" The latter is true, justice is arbitrary , If the former is true, morality exists higher than God, God is just a successor to moral knowledge. Several philosophers think this is a faulty predicament. Tenderness is the nature of God, it is inevitably reflected in God's orders. Another reaction promoted in the context of Emmanuel Kant and C. S. Lewis is that the existence of moral objective morality means the existence of God and vice versa. However, Euthyphro's response to the dilemma did not include all theoretical positions on this issue. In the traditional reaction of Judaism and Christianity, the essence of God is sufficient, Euthyphro's dilemma is no problem. Morality itself can be found in the nature of God, because it is his nature, he always acts correctly and orders. This does not apply to either side of the dilemma. For God is not separated from absolute moral standards and is not distinguished, nor is it an issuer of arbitrary orders constituting morality on God's will. Therefore, God's command is a derivative of morality and good in its nature, not morality as a derivative of God's command or will. This position solves many of the dilemma's problems; God maintains integrity, sovereignty and totipotency, objective moral standards also exist in the essence of God.

Throughout history, beauty is seen as a value to mankind. Beauty practice begins with the restraint of the foot and continues to cosmetic plastic surgery today like liposuction. All bulletin boards, magazines, and business citizens remind that they are not as physically attractive as possible, and that there are solutions to those problems. Kant pointed out that beauty is morality in his analysis of beauty. Physical beauty is highly appreciated in society, but it is not a factor driving ethical decision and making moral decisions. From a moral point of view, if your music is a physical sensation, morality will not be brought to the picture. The phrases commonly used in this related philosophy are "beautiful, not judgmental" and "beauty in the sidelines eyes". But if other features are considered, many of them are for moral reasons. I think that you can easily see it with lyrics and lyrics. For constructional reasons you will find that it is suitable for historical periods. So Mozart and Bach used "official" to write their time. If the orchestra is advertising the Mozart Festival and works other than Mozart are included, as long as it conforms to the period "style", that is no problem. If it claims to be similar to Mozart but not to style it would be too bad. It is like taking a set of drums to a blue grass concert, or playing a lullaby with a bagpipe. Someone will get angry Philosophy is properly divided into nature and morality, and in the same way there are two kinds of pictures: nature and morality: the former belongs to nature and the other belongs to moral philosophy. If you reflect on philosophy at the end of the sample or experiment, the picture will appear soon, or they must have the same effect. What is landscape or natural landscape, but the visible beauty of natural scenery, and the reason and experiment in natural philosophy? And it represents moral photographs or parts of human life, men's attitude, emotions, and personality, which are not samples of moral character, and also in the moral world's laws and connections Absent. 42 Humans are moral creatures and philosophy is very good at teaching us to adjust the complexity of life. This is not that philosophy gives you answers. But it certainly will make people more aware of the moral and normative aspects of human life.

Literature uses language and words to convey ideas and ideas. Literature is important as it helps connect and connect with each other by focusing on permanent and universal themes and benefits. Furthermore, through literary works such as national anthems, regardless of race, ethnicity, socio-economic status, it is important because all social citizens are unified. In modern society, other kinds of literature such as poetry, novels, essays, movies etc are also admired. Inferno's Canto 18 by Dante Alighieri Marseille Proust said: "You can not gain wisdom, you need to find it yourself ... ..." A journey to explore wisdom through wild is a dante · It is happening in Inferno of Alighieri. Inferno is the first part of a trilogy called epic, god comedy. Hell is about a talker, Dante, through the layers of hell, to understand the man and woman in hell, and in the end to understand why God punishes them there. Relationship between Dante and Virgil in Dante 's Inferno' s Canto XIV In Canto XIV of Inferno of Dante, Virgil explained the statue of an old man in Crete. Dante uses Crete 's old man as a metaphor of Virte' s legacy to clarify the essence of the relationship between Dante and Virgil. At the beginning of this metaphor, Dante explained in detail the magnificence of the Greek empire and Roman civilization and explained it in a systematic manner. "Once selected, Virgil explained." As a reliable birthplace / national epic regarded as Rome, it has been very popular since its publication. VirgilBeatrice sends Virgil back to Earth. As the poet Virgil lived in Christianity to regain Dante and serve as his guide to hell and purgatory he lived with other justice non-Christians of Ante-Inferno. Virgil served as his guide, for he praised that Virgil's work is higher than all other poets. As Dante was driven into the forest by the wolf, Virgil appeared in Hell 's first place. He recognized himself and felt the journey of the store. Dante's response to self introduction of Virgil can feel the special role played by the heathen poet in Dante's life and also serves his salvation. Dante insisted that he was a disciple and he learned how to use his crafts from Master Virgil, but this time she "fight against famous saints because she trembles my blood vessels and pulses" -90) In this lecture we will focus on Inferno's Cantos XIX and XXVI. Simone, a guilty sentence punished by Inferno XIX, has historically been pointed out the relationship between sanctity and harmony continuity and Dante's prophetic voice established by this Kant. The nuances between prophecy and blaspheme appeared again on 24th and 24th of hell, and the poet filled with poetic arrogance like a hell pilgrim. The danger of Dante's poetic mission was dramatized again in the subsequent Tantra. At Inferno XXVI, the tragic revision of Dante's Ulysses' journey proved that admitting risk while offsetting his poetic career.

"Moral judgment is only an expression of personal taste, there are some questions that can talk about facts, but moral discussion is a waste of time The only problem is people like or dislike about it". Moral judgment is usually based on your growth, your favorite person, your religion (or non-religious), and many other aspects that constitute your personality. Moral grounds for many problems such as homosexuality, abortion, murder, theft The definition of moral relativism is that truth or false moral judgment is based on relatives of many factors and that the universal moral judgment is not absolutely right or wrong It is that. In this article, I would like to discuss moral relativism. In my opinion there is no objective morality, all morals consist of people's opinions, which are influenced by different cultures, time and individual factors. As for multiculturalism, ethics is different if society is different You may have heard of moral relativism and believe that moral judgment can be considered as true or false based on historical, cultural or social background. According to moral relativism, two people with different circumstances sometimes express different opinions as to whether their behavior is correct or wrong, and they are all correct. They think that they are right or wrong depending on their career, and both should be considered valid. As a philosopher of enlightenment, Kant tried to find a rational moral truth rather than sacred authority. He believes that unlike religion, culture, community, we can not 'race' rationality. This is the reason why we are human beings. That is why he thinks that we should act as reasonably as possible. Evidence of deliberate moral judgment such as that by Cushman and Young shows a model of moral judgment that people use a rational cognitive process to evaluate the cause and mistake of potential moral errors It is. Their investigation showed participants the situation that one acted in a way that would affect others. The researchers manipulated the information on who caused the error, what they intended to raise an error, and what kind of harm was caused. These facts indicate changing participants' moral judgment, which means deliberate moral judgment. This theory emphasizes the "right" evaluation of moral facts, the goal of minimizing harm and maximizing happiness is the moral two goals. It is ultimately a rational decision theory, people observe the world, decide whether their facts are in line with their overall moral code, and make moral decisions.

Bay associates the essay with the Hegelian dialectical process and creates a new and higher level truth. [From Latin, Greek synthesis method, from suntithenai, was gathered to summarize: sun-, syn- + tithenai, to; looking at India - roots of European dhē -. (Chemistry) A method of preparing a compound by chemical reaction or a series of reactions from a simpler or generally available starting material than usual. 4. (Linguistics) In linguistics, we use morphing instead of word order and function words to express syntactic relationships. Comparative analysis 5 It is one. (In Kant 's work) Unify concepts and concepts that are not included. Comparative analysis 7 The final stage of the Bay Hegel dialectic solution resolves the contradiction between the assertion and the opposite [C17: Chorus from Latin to Greek, from suntithenai to combination, from syn- + tithenai to place] 1. In contrast to analyzes, individual components or abstract entity components are combined into a single or unified entity. Formation or construction of more complex chemicals or compounds from elements or simpler compounds [1580 to 1590; Latin <Greek = syn (ti) thé (nai), build (syn-syn- + tithénaitoput) + -isisis] In the use of information, the processed information is checked for final interpretation and combined with other information and information. The whole consists of such a composite part. Please also look at thoughts. - synth, n, - - synthesis, synthesis, adj For reasons to results, processes such as deductive reasoning, from simple elements to complicated holes. See participation. - Synthesizer, n. - synthesis, integration For reasons to results, processes such as deductive reasoning, from simple elements to complicated holes. See participation. - Synthesizer, n. - synthesis, integration, adj Compounds are formed by constructing compounds directly from the element or other simple compound In general, integration is the creation of new ones by combining two or more ones. In system thinking, the goal is synthesis rather than analysis, it breaks down the complexity into manageable components. Analysis applies to machines and simplified worldview, the world is divided into parts. The two main types of feedback loops are boost and balance. It may be difficult to figure out that stepping up the feedback loop is not usually a good thing. This happens when elements in the system are strengthened more strongly, such as population growth and rapid increase in pond algae. In an intensive loop, a rich element can constantly refine itself, it usually takes over it New comprehensive population, urbanization and environment This revision brings together three closely related issues together into a new integration. In chapter 15, we begin with an overview of census research so that the proportion of people living in cities will steadily increase, and then link these two themes to the state of the physical environment. The latest statistics teacher relies on this article to include the latest statistics. The sixth edition was reissued using the latest data on the Internet and traditional publications from various government agencies and private organizations. The author promises to use the latest available statistics throughout the body - often in 1999 and even 2000. In addition, the authors periodically review over a dozen journals and various media publications. The fields of organic synthesis and organic synthesis have been regularly reviewed 9, 10, 23-27 Furthermore, recent research has shown that microwave assisted organic synthesis in water, 28 reactions in near critical water, and 29 Focusing on biocatalytic reactions in water. Therefore, we will not discuss these topics in this review.

Henry David Thoreau was born in Concord, Massachusetts on July 12, 1817. Thorough eventually went to Harvard University where he studied Greek, Latin and German. In his school days, he had to take a break to study due to illness. In 1837 he graduated from Harvard University but after that he did not actually know what he was trying to do. I did not know what I wanted, so I established a school with my older brother in 1838. Soon, John was sick and the school collapsed soon. Ralph Waldo Emerson wrote that Henry David Thoreau was alive. Transcendentalism is a religious and philosophical movement that evolved from the 1920s through the 1830s. It started in the northeastern United States. According to Paul Ruben, this movement was intended to protest the spirituality and intellectualism (Ruben) originally brought from the UK to the United States. The core belief in exercise can be inferred on a single line and discover the inherent advantages of nature and humans. They fought against the two major institutions that had influenced society at the time - government and religion - but they were told that there is the possibility of distorting individuals. Although the philosophical concept was developed by Plato, Henry David Thoreau and transcendental transit began as a movement of extreme religious movement against the conservative system. Historically, according to Peter Carafiol's transcendence, "It was intellectual property born from Kant and mediated by Romanticism between England and Germany." Prior to that, it was a monotheistic relationship. As Kalafior said, protests and dissatisfaction with Protestantism and Catholicism. Ralph Waldo Emerson as a pioneer of transcendence and Henry David Thoreau transcendence was a writing movement that took place in the mid - 19th century. It generally reached the peak of the American Renaissance, the American Golden Day, or the era called New England, formed in the middle of the early 19th century. The basic principles of transcendence include relationships between themselves and the whole world. First of all, in the "independence" of Ralph Waldo Emerson, Emerson called all of the community to be completely faithful to themselves. He insists that the most important thing for individuals and society is not to believe others' beliefs, but to make people believe in their ideas. Emerson believes that integrity will eventually lead to personal death, as people live for others and they are not loyal to themselves. So, in order to build a good society, citizens must concentrate.

It is relatively easy to confuse the ideas of Aristotle, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Reneshchet, but the ancient philosophy, politics and mathematics of the 18th century seem to be a very scattered theme. In relation to these differences, there are three different perspectives on common themes. That is technology. Rousseau seems to oppose technology directly, Aristotle's perspective is in the middle, it is like Rousseau, and Descartes supports technology. After reading the commentary on the origin of Rousseau's inequality, Aristotle's 'Nicomara Ethics', and Descartes 'Methodology', these conclusions can be drawn. If you have learned a course of philosophy or ethics, you may know standard thinkers, Aristotle and Plato, Kant and Hume, Descartes and Rousseau. These philosophers are one of the most influential thinkers in the modern world. They shape the foundation of individuals, population and society to establish ethical and legal norms. However, if you use only one philosophy course to satisfy your graduation requirement, you may not know the other half of the world view. Before the earliest Western philosophers breathed for the first time, the history and civilization as a whole rose, was dominated and collapsed (not to mention mothers' mothers and mothers). It is relatively easy to confuse the ideas of Aristotle, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Reneshchet, but the ancient philosophy, politics and mathematics of the 18th century seem to be a very scattered theme. In relation to these differences, there are three different perspectives on common themes. That is technology. Rousseau seems to oppose technology directly, Aristotle's perspective is in the middle, it is like Rousseau, and Descartes supports technology. - In the Nicomasian Code of Ethics, generosity is the third virtue Aristotle has investigated. He calls generous ideas directly with the meaning of wealth. As Aristotle said, generosity is an intermediate factor between waste and non-generosity, waste is excess and implied flaws. However, this virtue is not natural, generosity can be created through customs, but also requires experience and time.

The phrase "philosophy" is derived from the two roots of "philosophy" and "Sophia." Philo means love, Sofia means wisdom. Therefore, philosophy means love for wisdom. In fact, philosophy requires investigation, pursuit and quest of wisdom. Many great philosophers call philosophy an art of thought. Other people simply define it as a systematic study of human emotions and thoughts. It is worth noting that many fields that have been philosophical so far have been separated into independent fields. Ancient Western philosophy is generally divided into three periods. Initially, all the thoughters before Socrates were called PreSocratics, the second period covered the life of Socrates, Plato and Aristotle, and the last period encompassed various developments of philosophy including Stow. Ge School, Epicurean School, Skeptics, Neopra Tonics, Aristotle School. The end of ancient philosophy meant that Christianity had spread in the sixth century, but Socrates before the Greek philosopher was called the former Socratic philosopher or the former Socratic philosopher. They were the first Western philosophers to become active in the 5th and 6th centuries BC. In ancient Greece. These philosophers are able to consistently and comprehensively describe all the natural phenomena and events in human life without resorting to myths of the original principle (arkhöh; ἀρχή; origin or Try to discover the starting point). The phrase "modern philosophy" is a philosophical terminology that refers to a specific period in the history of Western philosophy (ie the philosophy of the 20th century and the 21st century). However, this expression is often compared with modern philosophy (pointing to the early stages of Western philosophy), post modern philosophy (which refers to the criticism of continental philosophers against modern philosophy), and non - technical use of phrases. Recent philosophical work The modern age was a very innovative era in Western philosophy. New spiritual and material theory, new concept of God, new political philosophy, and civil society theory are proposed. This period was from the end of the 15th century to the end of the 18th century (about 1500-1800). Books published by philosophers such as Descartes, Rock, Hume, Spinoza, Leibniz, and Kant will form an understanding of our modern philosophy. The early modern philosophical roots can be traced back to the 1200s - maturity and speculation of academic tradition. The philosophy of Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274), Occam (1288-1348) and Brydan (1300-1358) emphasizes the ability of human rationality. With such abilities, we can fully understand secular and sacred things.

These moral principles are "beneficial", "autonomy", "justice", "indiscriminate", "loyalty", and "authenticity". We will examine how each ethical principle influences the behavior and behavior of practitioners in the healing process. Advantage: This ethical principle simply shows good things, acts aggressively and, if possible, prevents customer harm. It reflects the consultant's responsibility to contribute to the client's welfare. Why does the counselor have to comply with this code? Application of Ethical and Legal Principles in Patient Education Considering the ethical and legal liability inherent in the patient education process, the six main ethical principles are complicatedly summarized through the ANA Code of Ethics (2001) and the AHA Patient Act It is done. . Rights (1992), and similar documents published by other medical institutions, and the first autonomy of these principles of federal autonomy are derived from Greek auto (self) and nomos (law), self rights It refers to. Decision (Tong, 2007). Legislation has been enacted to protect the right to make patient independent choices. Federal government tasks such as informed consent must be evident in each federal funding application to support biomedical research. Local IRBPHS will assume the responsibilities of judges and jurors to ensure compliance with this enforceable regulation (Dickey, 2006). In the sixth phase (driven by the universal moral principle), moral reasoning is based on abstract reasoning using universal ethical principles. The law is effective only on the basis of justice, and the commitment to justice is obliged to violate the unfair law. Since social contracts are not essential for moral and ethical behavior, legal rights are not necessary. Decisions are not made conditionally, but rather on absolute terms like Immanuel Kant's philosophy. This includes personal imagination about what they do with other people's shoes if they believe that others are imagining it is genuine. The resulting consensus is the action taken. In this way, actions themselves are not instruments, they are eternal purpose, personal behavior is correct, not to avoid punishment in the best interests, expectations, legal or prior agreements. Judgmental behavior includes six moral / moral disciplines, including gold, rules, taxonomy of Emmanuel Kant, principle of utilitarianism, principle of risk aversion, principle of change of Descartes, and moral "free lunch" There are moral principles. These principles should be used in conjunction with ethical analysis.

What is the relationship between the revolution and how culture and political thought expands? (Earth and Its People, 581) The late 18th and early 19th century revolution was directly influenced by intellectual thinking of wise intellectuals and their students. New ideas were developed and inferred by Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Immanuel Kant, Voltaire (François-Marie Arouet). The rise in the literacy rate of European people and the larger Western countries brought questions about the government and the exchange of ideas and discussions in the public finally revolutionized the public. Revolutionary change - revolutionary change is dramatic, rapid and extensive. This fundamental change may mean a new way of doing things, a new goal, or a new organizational structure. As Jones and George mentioned, the three key elements of the revolutionary change are "reengineering, restructuring, and innovation." Revolutionary change is appropriate in the technology industry where rapid progress is frequent. Although organizations can not plan their respective situations, "scenario planning" is ideal for predicting potential revolutionary changes. In the scenario planning, the company assumes possible future results and creates a plan to process each result. Changes are classified as gradual and gradual change, or revolutionary change, sudden and intense change. Evolutionary change has increased small adjustments to strategies and structures to respond to environmental changes. The revolutionary change brought new ways of working, goals, and structures. Three ways to implement revolutionary change are re-engineering, restructuring, and innovation. The five force models, also called Porter five force models, are simple yet powerful tools to understand the power of the business environment. This is useful as it will help you understand the strength of the current competitive position and the strength of the position you want to enter. The revolutionary social change involves a revolutionary change in thinking. Charles Darwin's theory of evolution is widely accepted and encourages the emergence of secularized ideas. Siegmund Freud and others have pioneered a scientific understanding of the heart and emotion that was previously considered a reservation in the spiritual realms; Albert Einstein's relativity theory has completely changed the way people think . Others analyze society in new ways and seek new economic and social structures. In summary, these multifaceted ideas and technological innovations will have a major impact on people's view of the world.

The conflict of faith Earth and all the life above it are created within 7 days, at least this is how I grew up in the Catholic family. This is all I know, until I first heard about the evolution of a fifth grade. I can not understand that concept and my mother can not tell me what it is because she does not believe it may be true. Over the next few years, I gradually learned more about evolution. When I learned that Darwin's strange thing is called "correction and decline", my growth experience began to be questioned. It is based on the theory of absoluteism: - There is a single list of truths - they can only be represented by a series of concepts - they require the same actions around the world - it conflicts with faith, Culture must be respected - assume that people must use only one set of concepts to express moral truth. - KANT JOHN S. MILL JOHN RAWLS to check ethical dilemmas, cooperate with justice, thoroughly understand possible alternatives, assume ethical arguments, compare and evaluate discussions of alternatives. 384 - 322 1724 - 1804 1806 - 1873 1921 - 2002 Looking at the moral dilemma reflecting your ethical decisions and checking the results 3 09/09/2013 Virtual ethical virtual Cultural confrontation is a big topic. As a nurse leader, we are: 1) to promote cultural conflict, 2) to see the appropriate situation from the perspective of cultural conflict, and 3) to explore from providing cultural conflicts and cultural sensitivity A deeper understanding of people's perspective I hope that the point I used to classify all of these has now been revealed to be one of meme and boundary. It is easy to construct this global phenomenon thanks to the conflict of faith that various cultures have, that is, the complex interaction of the country's rats, the collective stories of mice and the experience of the city, and the mechanism of interaction. When the world is experiencing a conflict of faith, the audience asks about the state of secular ethics. The Dalai Lama said: "There is nothing to destroy others' faith, which can not be his belief."

Hegal claims that history took place through conflict between opposing forces. Marx accepted this theory, but I thought it was too ideal. Marx will not accept the material world to stop us from seeing the real world. In fact, he thinks that an ideology actually hinders people from seeing their lives clearly. Marx pointed out that there is a clear difference between the means of production (such as land and resources) and the social relationships that people agree to acquire and use. Most of the great ideas of the 20th century - perhaps all - have an ambiguous relationship between Karl Marx's work and heritage. However, even if it is negligible, it is more blurred than Hannah Arendt. Meanwhile, after Marxistism, Arent tried to find the magnificence of political or public life, but she believed that Marxism simplified politics to "social problems". In other words, freedom of Arendt depends on the construction of "emergence space", that is, the stage where various roles occur and participation in discussion and discussion is possible. Marx and his supporters see this space and the stage as a fantasy ideological expression. Therefore, they mistake the kingdom of liberty as necessary, and when they become powerful, they cancel the first one under the name of managing the second person. Susan Ascher HUM - 2249 - 06 Z September 29, 2014 Karl Marcusal Heinrich Marx was born in Trier, Germany on May 5, 1818, a lawyer Heinrich Marx and a Dutch woman, Henrière, were born . Pr. Preston Marx. As the biggest child among the five children, Marx accepted Jewish baptism as his parents; he went to Lutheran elementary school. He quickly rejected the religion of Christians and Judaism, became an atheist and a materialist. Marx insisted that "religion is people's opium" (curl), he later studied at Friedrichshain stadium Karl Heinrich Marx is one of nine children born in Heinrich and Henrietta Marx in Prussia Trier. His father was a successful lawyer who respected Kant and Voltaire and was an avid activist in Prussian reform. Both parents are Jews and Jews, but Karl 's father was 35 when he converted to Christianity in 1816. This may be a professional concession to the law that prohibited Jews from entering the upper class in 1815. It was the main belief of Trier that he accepted the Lutheran church rather than a Catholic, "Identify Protestant and Intellectual Freedom". After her father died, I waited until 1825

In this article we will focus on precisely defining negative freedom and positive freedom and clarifying which is more valuable. In addition, later in this article, we will focus on reasoning reasoning reasons for deductions and explain why freedom should be evaluated by another freedom. According to Hugh, negative freedom can be regarded as being exempted from obstruction (Hugh 2006). Freedom is an opportunity to act on opportunities offered to people, which does not mean people choose to act at these opportunities (Hugh 2006; Berlin 1958). Isaiah Berlin points out that positive freedom always leads to dictatorship in his theory of freedom and society should pay attention to negative freedom. Pursuing positive freedom may not bring freedom. For example, we require educational rights. That is a positive freedom. This requires government intervention, so the authority of the government increases accordingly. This may lead to infringement of individual freedom. By contrast, the risk of negative freedom is small. Liberation from external factors is a good example of this view. If people want to strengthen negative liberties, we just need to change the rules. However, in order to promote aggressive freedom, it is necessary not only to change the distribution system but also to change human capabilities. More importantly, it relates to people's wishes. Therefore, positive freedom has more opportunities for abuse than negative freedom. There are two kinds freely. Freedom (negative freedom) and freedom (positive freedom). The division of freedom into this binary framework can be traced back to Kant, which he at least described in detail in his 1941 work "Escape from Freedom" at Isaiah Berlin's 1958 paper "Two Freedoms". It is known for concepts and explores Charles Taylor more modernly. These philosophers and thinkers often use these two different freedoms to discuss and discuss the role of government in civic life. But today, we would like to explore ways to think about the difference between freedom and freedom. It will help us to better understand our personal development and travel from boys to men.

American transcendence is a reform movement involving the development of new ideas revealed by political, cultural and philosophical changes. Overall, transcendence is not a religion but a way to believe in yourself. The transcendents do not rely on Christ's support, but tie himself to the concept of self-realization and realization, to realize peace and realize the greatest happiness they can achieve. Depending on the structure of the universe and the composition of the individual, he or she can live as he likes. It is psychological, not physical. American transcendence is philosophical, literary, and religious movement. From the 1930s until the 1850s, it was the most productive in intelligence activity. The central event in the history of American transcendence occurred in these decades: in 1832, Ralph Waldo Emerson felt that it was impossible for him to manage the Eucharist so that Ralph Waldo Emerson had a single church I resigned from his position at. A group of New England intellectuals known as "transcendental club" occasionally met at Emerson's house in 1836. Most influential transcendentalists American transcendence In the 1930 's, New England' s transcendence prospered after several monotheist clergy discovered Collerich 's work. Coleridge's idea was mainly romantic, but it was influenced by Kant. The common concept of transcendental philosophers, God is inherently intrinsic, is in the human soul to some extent, very welcoming the concept of treason against calvinism and the concept of complete human degradation (see Unitarian Calvinism). First of all, they were called by opponents as transcendents - the sudden ones in the original 'men who like' group are William Erie Sean, Ralph Waldo Emerson, Theodore. Parker, Henry David Thoreau, Oleste A. Bronson. Background, differences in interest and temperament make difference and difference inevitable In addition to the American Renaissance reform, a pluralist movement and transcendence were born. Summary Most of the Renaissance transcendental period was led by writer Ralph Waldo Emerson. Transcendentalism depends heavily on ideals, religion, independence, civic disobedience, individualism, idealism, nonconformity, and nature. Emerson outlined these transcendent ideal reforms and countless parts as the writers immediately follow this movement. Norton Collection

Philosophy - We think that we are willing to accept the changes brought by philosophical thinking. Philosophy outlines the ways in which we work in society, the way we think, and the many ways we act. It can also be said love for wisdom. As an individual, we are guided by the idea of ​​testing our knowledge of various concepts of life, including who we are and why we were brought here I will. Philosophical problems usually have not been answered to the questions asked and have been influenced by ideas that do not know the answer. Why is philosophy? As suggested by Aristotle, studies of philosophy, "love of wisdom", creation and development of thoughtful thinking can be accepted without accepting thought. In the philosophical worldview, Republicans who disregard tax increases and economic stimulus can at least consider the concept of tax increases and Keynesian economics. Democrats who face the opposite idea can do the same. Thoughts, not anger, may be the default response to the world view. Indeed, philosophy can do a lot to alleviate anger growth against modern American cancer tumors. These tools are present in East and West thought - accepted in the absolute order of Stoic's recommendation, Buddhist meditation, transcendence of humanistic reason, Kant. In the words of Socrates, philosophy will help us plant virtues. "Philosophy", "Historical philosophy", even "Anthropological philosophy" is also related to this narrow philosophy. Many philosophers express that they accept this restriction in their work by focusing attention on the language as a medium for expressing logical problems. When other philosophers claim that they still have importance and identity about human nature, their work is often classified as "philosophical anthropology", which may be caused by old usage accordingly. Avoid confusion. This term also applies to the explanation of the philosopher's old human nature. However, for the purposes of discussion, the main reference to the term philosophical anthropology will be the period of development of these ambiguities.

We educate our children that we are the best of our ideals and are the most ethical in our values. What is indispensable for our "nightcode" is the golden rule of Emanuel Kant. It is usually taught not only in school but also in life. Children never imitate their elders' behavior. This is the villagers who waved to us, raising children and explaining our words. Crimes such as murder make life cheap and people can consume life. There are some clichés against the death penalty. What is most popular is "Why do you want to kill to prove the murder is wrong?" Firstly, murder is defined as illegal killing of a malicious posterior person. Furthermore, comparing executions and murder is similar to comparing prisoner's imprisonment and kidnapping. Is there any contradiction when the police speed up arrest of speeding offenders? Yes. However, police officers are still acting within the scope of the law. When punishing criminals, law enforcement officers act well within the scope of law, whether they are fines, imprisonment or execution. Is the death penalty correct or wrong? Some may argue that the death penalty is morally wrong, but it is inhuman and I do not agree with it. Such as the number of serious murders, prisoners, crime, brutal continuous rapists and child molests are malicious and cruel. These actions are worth punishing. People who do these things without aiming to be part of a mainstream society. It is trying to imagine the deterrence of crime, the death penalty bringing justice for the family and the blockade of the victims ...... sitting in the dark, relatives, cold, straining his cell, death in a few minutes I know from lethal injection from. If their case is not handled correctly, if the evidence is not handled properly, innocent people may be dead. Imagine a family waiting for justice through a fatal injection for years. There are two aspects to every story, whether it is sad or whether two families already exist

The theme of theology is the core aspect of everyday life through the history of mankind. What all modern religions have in common is that they provide a set of rules that people should follow to live as a good moral being. This is called sacred Command Theory (DCT) when God (or a group of Gods) instructs believers to follow certain moral standards through careers such as prophets, religious textbooks, or other means I will. Those who accept this theory think that ethical behavior is consistent with God's order. And if we deviate from these orders, I believe that unethical behavior will occur. Sacred instruction theory is the meta-cognitive theory only if the act is mandatory, as long as it is directed by God. Sacred command theory is often said to have been confirmed by "Euthyphro's Dilemma" (because it first appeared in Plato's dialogue Euthyphro). Philosophers often discuss the sacred command theory as ethical theory based on pure reason, but that theory also raises questions about the relationship between reason and belief, such as: The philosophy of Erkegaard is shown. He discussed Abraham 's dilemma for his son' Isaac 's "leap of faith". It is beyond the moral realm. Plato's meditation on God's command theory can be found in his dialogue Euthyphro. The reasons for suffering Euthyphro are as follows. "Is God morally good so that you can order morally good things or do you morally do good to be commanded from God?" The latter is true, justice is arbitrary , If the former is true, morality exists higher than God, God is just a successor to moral knowledge. Several philosophers think this is a faulty predicament. Tenderness is the nature of God, it is inevitably reflected in God's orders. Another reaction promoted in the context of Emmanuel Kant and C. S. Lewis is that the existence of moral objective morality means the existence of God and vice versa.

According to the New York Times, teenagers listen to an average of 5 hours of music a day. Information from each song may vary depending on drug / alcohol reference or transcendence. Whatever the music is, you can learn from the ideas created by Ralph Waldo Emerson and Henry David Thoreau. Transcendentalism is a relatively loyalty word for most people, but today's music platform can be defined using five things: individualism, inspiration, instinct, idealism, and imagination. show. Transcendental theory is supported by Ralph Waldo Emerson and Henry David Thoreau, a controversial theory that began in the mid - 19th century and is controversial. Many people are doubtful about the value of transcendence, and in this modern era they seem to admit it less and more. I am one of the few people who have found some value in this old theory. Let's explain why. Transcendentalism itself describes the idea that people speak to them about the world than to their senses. - transcendence and rebellion - revolutionary politics is a romantic impulse of rebellion driven by human instincts. As the urge to rebel faction seems to be unique if individual freedom is sacrificed as collective interest, science probably studies the problem more deeply and makes its discovery a major government of the world Should be shared with. The main idea of ​​transcendentalism is based on the doctrines of ancient and modern European philosophers, especially Kant. It was founded by the group of members of the New England Beyond Club in the 1930's. Their leaders were Emerson, which was greatly influenced by Carlisle, Coleridge and other people and his young friend Thoreau. As sports evolved, it sponsored two important events. It is a publication from Dial from 1840 to 1844 and Brook Farm. Their main ideas are: a) living near nature, b) dignity of manual labor, c) human divinity, d) great brotherhood relationship among all, e) confidence and confidence, f ) Vulgar's prosperous prosperity that needs to resist

Freedom "Freedom will never be extinct for more than two generations" These are the speech about former president Ronald Reagan's speech, and he has dealt with him as chair for a long time. For many years, freedom of America has become a controversial topic and the effectiveness of the government in providing these freedoms has been questioned. Through historical documents and events, we can confirm the effectiveness of the government guaranteeing all freedoms. There are two kinds freely. Freedom (negative freedom) and freedom (positive freedom). The division of freedom into this binary framework can be traced back to Kant, which he at least described in detail in his 1941 work "Escape from Freedom" at Isaiah Berlin's 1958 paper "Two Freedoms". It is known for concepts and explores Charles Taylor more modernly. These philosophers and thinkers often use these two different freedoms to discuss and discuss the role of government in civic life. But today, we would like to explore ways to think about the difference between freedom and freedom. It will help us to better understand our personal development and travel from boys to men. Freedom is the driving force of peace. Freedom of selection freedom of movement. Freedom of thought Free innovation You can freely talk and communicate. Our project aims to protect these liberties by widely disseminating friends and transferring ownership of technology to users themselves. This platform provides a tool choice for all users to use in every travel place. A tool to conceptualize ideas. They can build their own applications online and distribute them in seconds. You can communicate using powerful instant messaging and peer-to-peer video conferencing software that anyone on the Internet can use. They can do all of this on any computer with unpacking from all the devices, with internet connection

Transcendentalism is a belief centered on the common interests of mankind and the environment and since the mid 1800's, this concept has repeatedly influenced society around the world. The American anti-cultural movement in the 1960s was a typical example of the transcendence revival. In particular, the group of hippies is famous for their free thinking, love, and support for peace, not to mention the strong resistance to war and extreme behavior. In addition to the American Renaissance reform, a pluralist movement and transcendence were born. Summary Most of the Renaissance transcendental period was led by writer Ralph Waldo Emerson. Transcendentalism depends heavily on ideals, religion, independence, civic disobedience, individualism, idealism, nonconformity, and nature. Emerson outlined these transcendent ideal reforms and countless parts as the writers immediately follow this movement. Norton Collection Transcendental transcendence in Emerson's poetry is an American philosophical movement developed in the early 19th century. Ralph Waldo Emerson is one of the most famous and extraordinary writers. The transcendental concept is different from all writers and poets, but some important points always exist in transcendental literature: "God's inner being in the human soul; individual advantage over society .. Intuition, imagination and vision are ways to understand American transcendence In the 1930 's, New England' s transcendence flourished after several monotheist clergy discovered Collerich 's work. Coleridge's idea was mainly romantic, but it was influenced by Kant. The common concept of transcendental philosophers, God is inherently intrinsic, is in the human soul to some extent, very welcoming the concept of treason against calvinism and the concept of complete human degradation (see Unitarian Calvinism). First of all, they were called by opponents as transcendents - the sudden ones in the original 'men who like' group are William Erie Sean, Ralph Waldo Emerson, Theodore. Parker, Henry David Thoreau, Oleste A. Bronson. Background, differences in interest and temperament make difference and difference inevitable Transcendentalism is idealism. This non-practicality may be attributed to this. Like other schools of thought, transcendence works on paper, but it actually does not work. Thoreau believes in the purity and morality of humanity. Nathaniel Hawthorn believes that the crime is human. It is this conviction that it is correct, the destruction of utopian transcendence. As long as humans maintain the essence of ultimate integration, transcendental society can not survive. Transcendentalism can only be used as a guide to improve my morality, not my way of life.

Human Rights and John Rawls People's Law Legislation: Which political and judicial foundation can prove the transition from the West to the general in particular? John Rawls tried to answer this question in his article "People's Law" and proposed a contract or agreement. The free and democratic society should reach the first agreement on several political and social issues such as human rights. Then this agreement can be extended to the society that is necessary to satisfy peace with an organizational legal system that admits freedom and democracy but an organized hierarchical society, or to some extent freedom - politics and religion John Rawls introduced the concept of human rights politics in his book "People's Law" (Rolls 1999). The basic idea is to determine what the human rights are and what they need by determining the main role that human rights fulfills in a particular political field. In the People's Law, this field is international relations (followed by the politics of the country). An attempt by Rawls to rectify international law and politics in today's international system will help Rawls explain how to focus on how human rights works in this system. Human rights in interpersonal relationship does not belong to this field John Rawls is a 20th century American philosopher specializing in the fields of ethics, political philosophy, and law philosophy. Rawls is considered by many as the most important political philosopher of the 20th century and his symbolic "justice" is trying to combine many competitive political theories that are thought to be incompatible It is praised for what he did. In the nineteenth century, political philosophy divided Karl Marx's radical equalityism and concept of individual freedom and freedom acknowledged by John Stuart Mill. Rolls rejected Marx's communism and Mill's utilitarianism, returned to the early modern social contract model, and was influenced by Rock, Rousseau, Hume, and Kant and formed his own theoretical version . Rawls' philosophy has been widely praised, but it produced two books contrary to justice theory.

Millions of people all over the world are trying to adapt to the lives of countries that are not themselves. In some cases, this movement is optional, as people are seeking better opportunities to live, receive education and work. In many cases, however, immigrants are forced to survive only by people, by escaping from poverty, civil war, war, or the work they are seeking. Migrant workers are those who are engaged in paid activities in countries where they are not citizens. Regardless of the method and period of remuneration that domestic labor organizations (ILOs) perform domestic workers by one or several employers and are unable to earn monetary benefits, "Labor Organizations working in private households" We define it. "Domestic workers are often treated as domestic workers, nanny, cooks, drivers, gardeners, and other civil servants, and some family members and migrant workers work under slave-like conditions There are people, too. In the past decade, the form of modern slavery in "advanced" or "first" world has expanded. That is the exploitation of alien migrant workers. Domestic workers brought to other countries by diplomats and corporate executives are the most abused and fragile migrant workers. Although not a slave, the basic human rights of immigrants are often infringed or ignored. Exploitation ranges from wage and time violations to physical and sexual abuse. In many cases, employers detain legal documents of migrant workers, thereby limiting their liquidity. These domestic workers are not protected by the Labor Protection Act; this fact, coupled with language and cultural barriers, is an easy subject of exploitation. Cutting off the chain movement (formerly known as the move movement of immigrant workers) is an organization that promotes the plight of these workers in the United States and most domestic workers are Africa, Asia, Latin America He is reported to be a poor woman in developing countries. Please enter the United States with a temporary visa. Once a visa document is issued, international organizations and embassies will adopt a "noninterference" approach to cope with the plight of these domestic workers. International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of their Families. It was adopted by the General Assembly at resolution 45/158 on 18th December 1990 Little attention has been paid to women's lives and profits. Alison Jaggar explains this in Claudia Card (ed.) Feminist Ethics (1991: Kansas Press) article "Feminist Ethics: Problems, Project Prospects". She is ethical in areas related to women (irrespective of how tilted), family, "private" areas, etc. How truly ethical matters are problems in the public and political sectors It is pointed out whether it is considered to be. Emphasize rationality. Utilitarianism and cantism deny emotions that make moral decisions implicitly or explicitly. Bentham is proud of his "objectivity" of the story - moral calculations can do any rational person and can reach the same conclusion. Likewise, Kant completely rejects inclusion of emotions in making moral decisions - in fact, for Kant, their tolerance can impair any morality that may be involved. Like Paul Taylor said: In this discussion of feminist ethics, I would like to introduce several backgrounds of feminist ethics and some of the key ideas governing it today - whether feminists build moral theories (or at least deal with ethics) In cases where the feminist makes a moral argument with a different opinion Feminist Justice ethics is feminist morality, aimed at interacting with traditional ethical and universal methods and finally changing it. As with most types of feminist ethics, feminist justice ethics focuses on ways to eliminate gender from mainstream ethical considerations. The mainstream morality is considered to be male-oriented. However, feminist justice ethics is completely different from other feminist ethics. Common ethics is an important part

Jack Henry Abbott was born on January 21, 1944 at the military base of Oscoda, Michigan. His life, raised as a foster parent and living according to state law, Jack Ebbot did not have much opportunity to live a normal life. From the moment he was born, he lived in the state foster care system. After a while, he encountered a legal problem. As a teenager, he lives in a state juvenile camp. Jack will be punished because he is such a child. His life was punished because everyone knows his past. Jack Henry Abbott's book "In the belly of the beast" is an autobiographical explanation of the authors' lifelong experience at the penal institution, the role of the child as a time of many minor crimes killed in his later years I will fulfill. When he tried to keep his position as a "victim" of social traps, he made various attacks on various American institutions in society. Autologist authors introduce readers through letters about the horrific reality of prison life. Though considered to be a mentally disabled person, his acting offers rich insight that makes us feel the need to reform the prison system which may not be suitable for the name of "official facility". This book offers everything from tormenting his time in the "cave" to the political and philosophical basis of Kant and Marx. In addition to this philosophical "belly belly", another more specific aspect overwhelmingly reflects the "belly" of new hope. Like A New New Hope's Mos Eisley, Jehda City is a dusty hive that wanders the Fascist Arashi Knight. Both Jehda and Cassian were overwhelmed by shootouts, extremists and bombs when they crossed the market to find people they could help find find saw. We soon met a lot of people who helped Jyn's trip. The aforementioned K - 2 SO shows his ability as a warrior and a spy. I agreed that a blind man named Chirrut will also appear together with an ambitious (wanting?) Jedi and his muscle Baze Malbus. One noteworthy factor is that Chirrut can work closely with Hero's Journey on "New Hope Hansolo" and you can see Freud's rating in both movies. In Rogue One, there is a self (Jyn) led by id (Cassian) with the help of Chirrut

Through modern history, other methods of thinking about human evolution do not exert greater influence than enlightenment. Enlightenment philosophers and great thinkers have changed the logic of human thinking and promoted large-scale progress in all aspects of society. Over time, the progress of Western thought helped to build a more intelligent society like Max Hawkheimer and Immanuel Kant with contemporary philosophers who influenced western thought. That view is incorporated into its political activities. Green, John C., Adam 's death - Evolution and influence on Western thought, (Mentor Book published jointly with the Iowa State University Press Bureau in 1961). I read this article in January 2000. Since about 150 years between Isaac Newton and Charles Darwin, this is a historical review of the development of physics and the influence of parallel decline of the word "Adam". Thus, when Darwin wrote the origin of his species, this book records the death of Adam. I think this is a highly educational reading. Darwin condemns the decline of social ethics standards, but this book clearly shows that Darwin began long before Darwin was introduced. Darwin occupies a very high position in the history of Western thought and deserves the reliability of evolution. In "Origin of Species" published in 1859, he raised evidence to prove the evolution of organisms. Darwin did not use the term "evolution" which has no current meaning, but expresses evolution of living things through "common decline and modification" and similar expressions. But Darwin has done more important things to the history of thinking than showing evolution. In fact, diversity and common lineage evidence may be an attachment to Darwin's masterpiece. The origin of Darwin's species is, above all, the top priority for solving the problem of how to scientifically think of life design. Darwin is trying to explain the design of living beings, their complexity, diversity, and the wonderful design that are the result of the process of nature.

Section 2: From the Second Poeni War to the Emperor's Rome .................................. ... ... ........................ ... 324 Section III: ................................................. ............................................................................................................................................................. ........................................................................................................................................................................... . ................ 332 Chapter 2. Christianity ......................................... 337 3rd chapter Byzantine empire. .......................... 353 Part IV: The world of Germany ..................................... 358 1st quarter: Christianity Germany Elements of the world. .................................................... ............................................................................................................................................................. ............................................................................................................................................................. .................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 366 Chapter 36 Chapter 1: Immigrants from barbarians ......................... 364 Chapter 2 ...................... ..................... 373 Chapter 3 Charlemagne Empire. ................... 377 Section 2: Middle Ages ................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Feel and rank. ............ 383 Chapter 2. Crusader ... ... chapter 407. Transition from feudalism to monarchy. ............................ .... ............................. 417 Art and science as a medieval era .......................................... .................................. 427 Section III: Modern. ..................... 430 430 Chapter 1 Reform ... .. ................................... 431 Chapter 2. Impact of reform on political culture development of.............................................. ... ...... 446 Chapter 3. Kura and the revolution ... 458 Immanuel Kant is considered to have been most affected by modern philosophers. Kant's philosophy is the foundation for establishing the structure of Marxism, in particular by Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel. The dialectic of Hegel is accepted by Karl Marx and extends Kant's anti-inference method. By the time of his death, Hegel was the best philosopher in Germany. His views are widely taught and his students are highly appreciated. His followers were quickly divided into right-wing and left-wing Hegelians. In theology and politics, Right Hegel provided a conservative interpretation of his work. They emphasized the compatibility between Hegelian philosophy and Christianity. Politically, they are orthodox. The left wing Hegelian eventually became an atheistic position. In politics, many of them became revolutionaries. Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (1770-1831) is one of the greatest systematic thinkers in the history of Western philosophy. In addition to focusing on German idealist philosophy, Hegel boldly asserts that his own philosophy system represents the historical climax of all previous philosophical thinking. Hegel's overall encyclopedia system is divided into logic, natural philosophy, and spiritual philosophy. The most lasting concern is his view on history, society and the state, and they are within the objective spirit. Some people think that Hegel is a nationalist advocate of the Prussian state in the early 19th century, but his meaning is more extensive, Hegel himself considers his work to be an expression of the world's self consciousness

Definition of philosophy Personal or moral philosophy is how to live or how to act. People who claim that the philosophy of our life is "lifetime", "at horn", or some cliches are often heard. Though the definitions are correct, these people use the phrase "philosophy", but the words closely related to our past, present and future great thinkers are different. The philosophy for people pursuing knowledge, meaning of life, and the truth of everything means bigger and less concise. This is a more extreme definition of philosophy. This definition begins with the philosophy of the turn of the century. Resistance to the metaphysical philosophy system is rising. The metaphysical system of philosophy will explain everything from the perspective of a wonderful idea such as "thinking" and "spirit". This reaction is primarily contrary to idealistic philosophy, which is a highly developed metaphysical philosophy. Details about this are displayed in the fifth definition. Language analysis emphasizes rejection of metaphysics and accepts simple but useful scientific verification of modern standards. Their central argument is that only the logical truths and empirically verified descriptions make sense. In this case, what does scientific verification mean? This can be said to be the case if you can verify or copy experiments. We now turn to the definition of some philosophy. These are historical methods, the philosophy of criticism, philosophy of language analysis, philosophy of change planning, a series of questions and answers to philosophy, and philosophy of world view. In the process, we analyze the definition and draw some conclusions about this analysis. Remember our question: What is philosophy? According to this method, philosophy is actually a study of a historical person who is regarded as a philosopher. Everyone is regarded as a philosopher, such as Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Augustine, Thales, Filo, Protino, Aquinas, Kant, Eligina, Hume, Marx, Hegel, Russell, Whit Genstein. As many of their views are quite diverse, what happens together? One answer lies in their common problems and concerns.

Transcendentalism: The spirit of transcendental refers to the fundamental truth of the universe transcending knowledge gained from senses, transcendental belief that it is only knowledge about the appearance of objects (adventure 162). Transcendentalists believe that thinking is a place to form ideas. The transcendental ideas of God, humanity, and the universe are not all original, but a combination of other philosophies and religions. One of the main questions of philosophy is "What is the essence of the universe?" Emmanuel Kant was one of the principal transcendents of his time. Independence is the culmination of Ralph Waldo Emerson's longstanding work and culmination of his transcendental philosophy. Emerson assumed that the heart is obediently initially obedient. Throughout the article, he defended the famous slogan 'Believe in myself.' This discussion follows three main points: self-sufficiency genius, opposition to the world, and the value of self-worth. In the first part, Emerson believes that everyone's mind is a genius. He wrote: "Trust in your thoughts, believe that what is true to you in your private mind is true to everything, believe it is a genius." The rest of this section It is used to explore this concept. Emerson claims that Moses, Plato and Milton are included in those who trust themselves. In this article we compare the philosophy of transcendence and anti - transcendence through Thoreau, Emerson, and Melville 's works. In Thoreau's "Walden" section, he tested the transcendental philosophy through experience. Emerson's extraordinary writing style is shown in "Nature". In excerpt from Melville's "Moby Dick", he showed transcendentalism in his work. Transcendental sentences are related to the relationship between human spirit and nature. - ... Another theme of Walden is unity with God. Thoreau believes that God and philosophy, nature and mankind are united, and this concept arises from transcendental movements. Transcendentalism is a religious movement characterized by the belief that religion is something inside you, not others to tell you ("Solo, Henry David"). Transcendentalism: the spirit of transcendental refers to the basic truth of the universe transcending the knowledge gained from senses, transcendental belief that it is knowledge about the appearance of objects (Adventure 162). Transcendentalists believe that thinking is a place to form ideas. The transcendental ideas of God, humanity, and the universe are not all original, but a combination of other philosophies and religions. The main question in philosophy is "What is the essence of the universe?"

This series begins with the theme of philosophy from the theoretical level to the experience and experimental research verification. Published articles combine recent linguistic aspects of experimental semantics and pragmatics and experimental grammar, phonetics and cross-language psycholinguistics, and linguistics, psychology, philosophy, artificial intelligence Provide insight into the research. Cognitive scientific perspective of neuroscience, as well as important methods for the use and thinking of all available techniques. This series also presents intercultural intercultural research focused on finding diversity and universality with cognitive validity. A series of peer - reviewed edits and monographs inform the reader of the progress made through empirical and experimental studies in the language - related cognitive science field. The specialized "difficult" philosophy includes the history of logic, epistemology, philosophy of language, cognitive science / psychoanalysis philosophy, philosophy of science, philosophy, and the history of mainstream, logical, epistemological or "difficult" situations It seems to be metaphysical of. In most cases, ethicists use their analytical methods to process their work, so ass includes all kinds of above and all kinds of ethics. Most of these philosophical historians actually use an analytical method indistinguishable from the "hard" waist, but there are ambiguous "philosophical history" majors including all lists of ancient philosophy, but those Many are the opposite. Since work takes an analytical or logical approach, I also think that political and social philosophers are outside the weak, so they form an alliance with a tough parliament of philosophy. Students who are familiar with the history of cognitive psychology will quickly see the relationship between Humboldt's linguistic view and Immanuel Kant's philosophy of the heart. In his influential 'Critique of Pure Reason' (1781), Kant said human thought is not just a "blank plate" where the world of the object left impression, but actively pursues the world according to its category I explained that it is an organ to be organized. . In his linguistic short story, Robert H. Robins explains how Humbold applied this concept to the language. While UCD PSY 20060 psycholinguistics studies the relationship between language and human thought, language dominates our cognition and social activities. This course examines which languages ​​are specific to humans and their relationship to biological and cognitive processes. Outlines the language acquisition of children and explores various aspects of language processing and social use. The purpose of this course is to introduce the main principles, methods, and findings of psycholinguistics to students.

You can define moral terms. The answer is obvious. Moral terms already exist and can be defined. "Good" means happiness, "Good" means usefulness, "Good" means self-realization or self-interest. Classical moral philosophers clearly do not feel difficult to define terms such as "good". However, it is these many different incompatible definitions that led Moore to see if philosophers knew what they were doing when trying to define good intentions. When considering the above problem, you must first define the terms "corruption" and "moral permission". Defining these two terms is a difficult task, but trying to determine whether corruption is justified because "morality" is difficult. Although "moral corruption" may be a paradox for many people, in this article we will modify these two terms by reviewing what is defined as "corruption" and the behavior taken under these circumstances Prove to be "moral" Permit, or morally good Although it is difficult to define the terms "corruption" and "moral permission", by looking at corruption examples, by defining ethical behavior based on the moral theory enumerated by Emmanuel Kant, It makes it easier to understand the meaning in. If the behavior of the meaning actor is false rather than reducing guilt or causing self-satisfaction, corruption can be considered morally acceptable under Kant's theory. Some theorists explain that corruption may actually lead to economic growth, but the general view that corruption has an overwhelming negative effect on the eradication of a corrupt society is in agreement There. There are many theories focused on reducing corruption, including control, exit, and voice strategy. The exit strategy is very similar to the strategy proposed by Eiras as it focuses on relaxing government regulation. The definition of the term "moral permission" or "moral" is equally difficult. Ethical behavior is often considered as behavior that society is not considered to be "wrong". According to Merriam Webster, morals are "principles dealing with right and wrong ..." (Eiras, 2003). Morality is often referred to as moral research - society considers "correct" or "correct behavior"; therefore, society thinks morality can also be considered moral. However, the focus and intent of this article are not based on explicit ethical norms for defining ethical behavior, and in order to judge whether something is ethical, "good" or " We must focus on the philosophy of determining bad behavior.

The court handled all incidents with maximum seriousness, but different cases received different treatments. For example, the murder case differs from the violation of traffic rules before the proceedings before hearing. In this article we outline the perception of philosophers' punishment and how the county district court handles the death penalty. First, punishment is an act that includes deliberately causing pain and suffering for correction. The main characteristic of retaliation that attracts us to the grounds of Utilitarian punishment is that retaliation binds punishment to those worthy of it. However, strict retaliatory punitive theory had several challenges. Utilitarians can offer several goals and benefits for punishment - greater benefit from deterrence and rehabilitation. Retaliation seems to maintain punishment for their own benefit, not a certain profit. For example, I believe that any serious retributors are responsible for ensuring that all people waiting for execution will be executed, even if the world ends tomorrow. Utilitarianism and retributiveism are the two mainstream views of the philosophy of punishment (Brandt 489). These theories provide different reasons for the government to punish citizens, different goals of punishment, and different kinds of favorable punishment. Utilitarianism is classified as positive: it focuses on the outcome of punishment. Utilitarians looked at the possible outcomes of punishment to determine whether penalties should be imposed and they always try to maximize good results. On the contrary, retaliography focuses on punishment for past actions. When choosing punishment, retributors did not compare and consider possible outcomes, but examined fraud in order to determine proportional punishment. What is another view of punishment? The main fight of Utilitarian penalty theory is called retaliation. "... Retaliation affirms the concept of human beings as human beings.When we deal with him in a way that depends on his own decisions and actions, we and others are the essence of retribution (Kant and Liberalist It is a desert, it will be two birds with one stone, but the main concern is what people deserve, not deterrence or healing, whether they use their own wish Use them for our purposes

Why Muller distinguishes between high pleasure and low pleasure and evaluates whether he has achieved his goal. In his article, the Utilitarian Institute detailed the utilitarianism as a moral theory and answered that misunderstanding. Utilitarianism in the word of Mill is a view that behavior is correct because there is a tendency to promote happiness and mistakes because there is a tendency to produce reversal of happiness. 1 Therefore, Utilitarianism provides answers to basic questions. Ethics are worried: 'How to live?' 'Or' What is the good or the right way to live? ' Utilitarian philosopher John Stuart Mill criticized Kant as it does not recognize that moral law is proved by moral intuition based on utilitarian principles (maximum maximum profit is sought Should be). Muller believes that Kant's morality can not explain why specific behavior is wrong without relying on Utilitarianism. As a basis of morality, Mill believes that his utility principle has a stronger intuitive foundation than Kant's dependence on reason, and why explaining better why specific behavior is wrong or wrong I can. Utilitarianism by John Stuart Mill, originally published as three independent papers in 1861 and then published as a collection in 1863, is one of the most famous Utilitarian ethics tests so far. Long-term debate about ethical tradition opens sentences. And there is a general lack of great progress. He could not reach any agreement on the philosopher's decision to be "right" or "wrong", understanding of society's morals remained unchanged in the study of philosophy over generations of generations I pointed out. He explains this lack of change by implying that all morals have a philosophical basis, and this foundation is Utilitarianism: moral action promotes happiness without happiness and pain It is a belief. Utilitarian utilitarianism is the ethical theory of consequentialism. According to the results, the behavior is right or wrong. John Stuart Mill is an important philosopher who developed practical ideas. Utilitarian believes that actions that bring more happiness in the world are correct actions and actions that bring pain and less happiness are wrong. Utilitarianism can be divided into different versions. Utilitarian utilitarianism is a moral theory, originally named Jeremy, as a guiding principle of action under certain circumstances. Bentham's hedonist (a happy follower) proposed "principle". Utility called 'maximum amount of maximum happiness'

I am analyzing commercial advertisements from state health promotion activities of Hawaii State Department of Health. The title of this ad is to rethink your drink and to explain why water is chosen, 100% juice and 1% low fat milk is a healthier choice in drinks. If you drink one can of soda or juice per day, the weight of a person will be 10 pounds per year. The rhetorical mean I found in this article is sorrow and spirit. The purpose of this analysis is to determine if this commercial is valid or persuasive. If you are asked to select a paragraph yourself, look for something that seems to be an important reference and ask some questions about it. Please read the analysis over and over and reconsider. Most people write lots of things, then narrow them down to the most basic elements and show the relationships between those elements. For example, get a very important quote from Kant. There are two important terms in these sentences, intuition and concept. Philosophical analysis usually begins with the definition of each term. This can be seen by looking at some of the other Kant's paragraphs and seeing what definition he is offering. Before showing relationships with other elements, please explain the meaning of each element itself. There are channels that you can use here and there; your job is to summarize these paragraphs with a simple definition like "intuition is the content of our experience". Then we turn to 'concept'. To begin the analysis, let's take a look at the E. L section. Doktoro's "Daniel" - fictional retelling of the Rosenberg test. In the climax of the novel, the son of Execution Rosenbergs faced a neighbor who had fake witnesses to his parents. But Daniel discovered that a male extremist who repented as a retired dentist named Mindish is now aged and has exhausted his life by the Disney Land tea cup. Ironically, however, many of the stories and characters Disney has chosen for cultural respect are dark and noisy. The original Alice in Wonderland is a symbolic and surreal work, a benign deviation of a genius ... Huckleberry Finn, a nightmare of childhood about the reality of American society. From this perspective, it is possible to understand the aesthetics of manga adaptation as totalitarianism.

What happens to the language of hell in Dante's Inferno? In Dante's hell, despite multiple language barriers and ruthless jealousy, obsessed pilgrims explore the language changes and nuances of trying to communicate with poor and dirty residents in hell. Dante's theme unifies language contradictions in hell, that is, he links pilgrims to failing attempts to communicate pilgrims with specific shadows, inexplicable languages ​​and sounds, and symbols of Christian myths. tower Learning the language in hell - Through the drama of hell 's journey Dante' s immortality, Dante will enable the reader to experience all his movements. The acquisition of his words, the sensitivity to nature's scenery and sound, and his accumulation of infinite knowledge make it possible for him to capture the reader and to drag it into the territory of the earth. Kant 6, glutton, cant 13, violent against you, hypocrite, Cantonese 23, Dante is good at describing the supernatural world of hell in detail. In each article, Dante combines the familiarity of his words with the sensitivity to natural scenery and sound. Then he raised the image by calling examples Relationship between Dante and Virgil in Dante 's Inferno' s Canto XIV In Canto XIV of Inferno of Dante, Virgil explained the statue of an old man in Crete. Dante uses Crete 's old man as a metaphor of Virte' s legacy to clarify the essence of the relationship between Dante and Virgil. At the beginning of this metaphor, Dante explained in detail the magnificence of the Greek empire and Roman civilization and explained it in a systematic manner. "Once selected, Virgil explained." As a reliable birthplace / national epic regarded as Rome, it has been very popular since its publication. VirgilBeatrice sends Virgil back to Earth. As the poet Virgil lived in Christianity to regain Dante and serve as his guide to hell and purgatory he lived with other justice non-Christians of Ante-Inferno. Virgil served as his guide, for he praised that Virgil's work is higher than all other poets.

"His" Socratic method "involves asking questions, especially pursuit of definition" (Sacks). The purpose of presenting a series of questions is asking people to think about it, and the series of answers, thoughts, and ethics that accompany it. In addition, based on the information provided in Socrates' life, he can infer that he is very humble and selfless. Unlike many other philosophers, Socrates never accepts money or exchanges for what he teaches; his goal is to prepare his students to be independent and maintain their public offices It is that. Neopra Tonism is a religious philosophy school based on the teachings of Plato founded in the third century AD. Neoplatinics accepted Plato's central view that the ultimate reality (or the only real existence) is a form rather than a subject of everyday life. The shape is an eternal, perfect ideal of that thing, while objects of sensation (we can discern it) are incomplete copies. In aesthetics, sublimation is a wonderful or vast quality that transcends calculation, comparison or imitation. This quality is usually quoted on nature. Sublimation as a concept of natural aesthetic quality is different from the beauty originally developed in the 18th century. British philosopher Edmund Burke was the first thinker to think that sublimation and beauty are incompatible. Bark said that even if the soul is anything, or even if it creates a feeling of fear among them, the imagination points to elevation. Immanuel Kant said this sublimation "absolutely wonderful". Protinus refers to tradition as a way to interpret Plato's intentions. It is easy for outsiders to misunderstand the meaning of Plato, as Plato's teaching is not for the general public but for university members. However, Protino tells how university philosophers achieved the same conclusion as the subject of his criticism (eg, eroticism of God's answer to the evil problem, or a bad mood) I tried to clarify. For Christians, the other world is heaven and it is enjoying after death; for platonists it is the world of eternal thinking, the real world, not the fantastic appearance. Christian theologians combine these ideas to embody the majority of Protino's philosophy. Therefore, Protinus has important historical significance in shaping medieval Christianity and Catholic theology.

The story of the novel essay is neither truth nor true, it was created by the author. These stories were imagined by the author and told the reader. Readers have the opportunity to add their own imagination to the story to make reading more enjoyable. The novel depends not only on the imagination of the author and the imagination of the reader but also on the elements of the novel. How to read a novel is realistic and unrealistic. When discussing the reading of these two novels, two stories are considered. In addition, this "fiction" and "story" research includes philosophical writings of Schiller and Kant, as well as many non-fiction articles and letters. There are many interesting possibilities for literary data analysis, but unfortunately this is not one of them. Beyond the above problem, the conclusion obtained is useless. Well ... X can rise (1). You can drop it (2). When X switches direction one time, X rises and then descends (3) or descends and then rises (4). When it switches twice, it becomes upper (5) or lower (6). Almost all of these six literals can be placed. How many emotional arcs do you think that this research reveals? Yes, 6 About 80 days ago, I changed from writing a novel to writing a prose. Because writing a novel everyday is a mental burden. Through prose, you can solve the central debate by writing the main freestyle. In the novel, you need to consider the story, character development, background story, motivation, dialogue, scenes When searching for "fiction" in Medium, what did you find today? Yes, that article. Articles on how to write novels, how to read novels on mobile phones, novel books, and why ironic writers find articles in the media. (Please note that this article was written in July 2015. I do not think yet that novelists have found a lot of traction here.) There MediumCreative.com. This is very interesting for you. Click the bait title in a different location from every list recycle. This is the perfect lounge for fiction, and it does not need to compete with nonfiction noisy music. Oh, is not it nice? I will definitely go to that place.

John Rock John Rock interprets the state of nature as an equality state that anyone can move freely without having power to anyone else. However, he pointed out that this freedom does not mean abusing other people's permission, but also natural laws even in the natural state. Everyone in the state of nature has the power to enforce the universal law of nature. The analysis of Locke's natural state is correct; Locke's theory contains many assumptions. Indeed, as it is not the background of interpretation of secularists, I have suspicions about rock. On the contrary, I think of Lock-shaped Hobbes, Kant, Hume, Bentham, Mill, and a resultisticism distorting contemporary reasoning - a lack of intentional mastery, practical reasons and will, and a way for human freedom to work . And the prosperity of mankind. These drawbacks can be attributed primarily to the metaphysics of locks that locate people's identity in consciousness. As to the concept of Locke's will, Locke pointed out that "the will of truth only represents power or ability to choose or choose." Given these views as a lack of self-control over freedom, these are powerful combinations. Dualism, autonomy, even positivism Hobbes, Rock John Rock and Thomas Hobbes are famous political theorists of other eras. Hobbes who was born 40 years before the birth of rock has a totally different view from rock and both will do more research through this article. Many theories were different in the 16th century, but the theory of Hobbes and Rock became closer. Because the rise of the state and the decline of the feudal system caused problems of authority. - Why John Rock was the best philosopher ever in history John Rock was a British philosopher and doctor who lived between 29 August 1632 and 28 October 1704. He is one of the most outstanding enlightenment thinkers, and he explains many ideas that will affect humanity. Live in society today. He emphasizes human freedom and limits the authority of the government, so he is widely known as the father of classical liberalism (18).

Morality has not always been recognized in defining ethics and has played an important role. The principle is often a virtue applied only to society and can be distinguished from law, religion or morality. Depending on the foundation of the society that asserts its morality, morals in its definition may differ from each other. Different societies have different understanding of the meaning of their moral priorities. When others concentrate on practice, their ethics are based on purity and honesty. In the field of morality and moral philosophy, systematic research can explain how to make the right or wrong theory of behavior. Meta ethics, ethical norms and applied ethics: Moral philosophy usually falls into three categories. Meta ethics will be concerned that it comes to meaning our moral values, language and principles, rather than research, applied ethics will use specific tools to study questions of philosophical controversy What is "What is moral?" "What is moral?" And provides a practical solution to ethical problems. Normative ethics will study ethical standards governing justification and misconduct. The theories of normative ethics include utilitarianism, outcomeism, contractualism, virtue ethics and so on. Ethics (also called moral philosophy) is a philosophical branch that solves moral problems. The word "moral" is generally used interchangeably with "moral" and sometimes it is narrower and more unique than the traditional moral principles, expressions for expression. "Similarly, Sometimes, a moral theory, a particular kind, especially a duty theory, we distinguish between ethics and morality: "People's morals and ethics are the same, but there is morality to restrict use in the system However, as a concept of such class-based responsibilities, obligations and principles, such as Kant. Based on the idea of ​​the book of virtue ethics, more Aristotle inference, practice, and generally other practical From the consideration, to avoid "moral" consideration. "

Morality: essential to life Russian born American science fiction writer and biochemist said, "Never mind your morality does not disturb your correct behavior." What is correct? How does morality affect the people and the community in which we live. Everyone has certain morals and they are trying to send their lives. People understand what their morals are. What is morality? We can not honestly answer these questions because everyone has its own definition of how to define their right and wrong and their lives. The morality of the master-slave is the central theme of Friedrich Nietzsche's work, especially the first article of "moral lineage". Nietzsche believes that there are two basic types of morality: "dominant morality" and "slave morality". Masters of pride and power of moral value, slavery morality appraises goodness, consideration, compassion. Unlike the morality of slavery, morality of ethics measures good or bad outcome behavior (ie classical virtue and vice, resultism) and the morality of a slave weighs the behavior of a good malicious image (Example: Christian's virtue and vice, Kant morality) Master is the creator of morals; slaves use the morals of their slaves to respond to their morals. Unlike Master's morality (emotion), the morality of a slave is based on the revaluation of feelings, that is, the devaluation of master and slave. Since the moral of the Lord began with a strong man, the morality of a slave began with the weak. Since the morality of slavery is a response to oppression, it will destroy oppressors. The morality of slavery is the opposite of the master's morality. Therefore, it is characterized by pessimism and sneer. The emergence of slave morality go against the "good" of the master's moral values. Nietzsche believes that there are two types of morality. Active morality that actively appears from "nobility" and slave morality developing reactively in the weak. These two ethics do not show a simple reversal of each other. Moral ethics incorporates action into the "good" or "bad" outcome, and the morality of slaves incorporates the behavior into the "good" or "bad" intent. To my surprise, he looked down on both, even if the first one was considerably less than the second one.

Contribution of science to the promotion of illness in the 19th century Continued development of scientific knowledge is the main factor driving disease. The first step in promoting disease is to discover microorganisms. Returning to the late 1600s, a Dutch watchmaker called Anthony van Leeuwenhoek made the first microscope. His microscope is not so clear, the clarity of the image is bad, but he is still studying whatever he can find. 1861: The theory of pathogenic bacteria by Lewis Pasteur will be announced. This is an example of progress in the scientific interpretation of nature and the universe in the 19th century. Emily Dickinson uses poetry to emphasize the perceptual and subjective experience as a natural tool for studying at hand, so the word "hope is down" is used to observe and understand the world Provide different methods. Today: the scientific view of the universe dominates Western thought. Astrophysicists like Stephen Hawking are studying "black holes" or space with gravity, so electromagnetic waves (including light) can escape. "Black hole" theory was once extreme and wonderful, but now it is a general speech. The history of science we know today started in the 19th century. In the 19th century, industrialization stimulated the rapid development of all sciences. In the last century, James Hutton Williams Miss founded the foundation of scientific geology, when Hume, Kant, Cam, Herder, and Sir Condorche wrote their universal history. In the 19th century, Lyel systematically developed around the concept of homogenization theory, after which Darwin used the concept of natural selection to do the same research on biology. Just four years after the origin of Darwin, Lyle announced "geo emerald geological evidence". Please do not shoot.

What is rationality: Reason of virtue means to recognize and accept reason as the only source of knowledge, the only worthwhile judgment, and the only action guidelines. ... This means that all people's beliefs, values, goals, desires and behaviors must be based on the commitment of the thinking process, selection and validation principles. What is experience: empirical knowledge is knowledge about facts that people may encounter in their experience. These are always special and can be of many kinds, including the need for extensive training or some equipment to experience them. In addition, much of the empirical knowledge is actually conveyed through teaching from the authorities, but it may be fairly reliable and true. Experience is often a bit vague. Therefore, since one may have been in the UK, I think I have knowledge of British experience, but even if it is so empirical, what the word "British" represents is personal It is a little too much for experience. And people. The way to decide if someone has some empirical knowledge is to test it in some way by using logic, or by referring to other knowledge that you think is possible. Method experiments can be as easy as finding words in a dictionary, or it can be as complicated as using a cyclotron or PET scanner. Why knowledge is rational and empirical: Kant's theory fills the gap between empiricism and rationalism and reveals that they can be understood as equilibrium, so historically and philosophically very important . Components In other words, our knowledge comes from empirical encounters and rational manipulation, and we can prove that pure experience and purely rational way can not achieve knowledge achievement. Instead, he believes that human understanding of its own nature allows experience and can be used for reasoning. Kant's theory not only provides a theoretical explanation of how modern results such as pure mathematics and natural sciences are possible but also the interaction between experience itself and understanding is based on its origin and boundary Push the philosophy forward in the direction that is important to find. It's a place. Human knowledge Finally, we believe that knowledge is reasonable and empirical. Immanuel Kant was a German philosopher who decided to combine these two ideas. Descartes believes that certain knowledge is "a priori" and irrelevant to experience. The other side of the idea is "ex posteriori" empirical knowledge. Transcendental knowledge is always correct, and ex post knowledge is comprehensive. Kant believes in the third type called synthetic a priori. This type is necessary and there are empirical elements The concept of prior knowledge is based on intuitive or rational insight. Laurence BonJour said in his article "The structure of empirical knowledge" that "reasonable insight" to "see" direct, non-speculative understanding, understanding, or proposal must be true I said. Thanks to your explanation, at least I can try my work. I can try my own work. Guidelines absolutely helpful when I start a trip to my doctoral program Knowledge can be received by two sources called empiricism and rationalism. Whether knowledge is empirical or rational, knowledge - derived philosophy is constantly being debated. "In the philosophy of science, empiricism is a knowledge theory emphasizing aspects of scientific knowledge closely related to experience, especially through intentional experimental arrangements" (empiricism). Empiricism is that knowledge can be gained through sensation and knowledge can not be understood without feeling. The rationale is quite different from empirical evidence. It assumes that reason is the source of knowledge. In the opinion of philosophers who support rationalism theory, acquisition of knowledge has three types of knowledge. The first one is to have innate knowledge. They strongly say that innate knowledge is completely different from perceived knowledge. This is true, it can not do anything else

Despite the Zeno paradox and other authoritarian arguments, I continue to diversify. According to Atomist, everything is a compound composed of several small invisible particles. Leucippus and Democritus claim that these 'atoms' are cornerstones of the universe. I will explain the relationship between Atomism theory of Leucippus and Democritus and its common sense. An apology philosopher before Leucippus came up with the idea that "for what" must be left as it is. First, as a critical philosophy, as an ancient practice of Persia, it is not a prescription for political content. However, as in the case of ancient philosophy, criticism has constitute a politically appropriate reality: Foucault and the "philosophy should not be used in order to explain that should be made in politics" is I have written. Within stable outside relations, politics, this is true "(2010: 354). As Kant did in the French Revolution, philosophy is in doubting the importance of events. Secondly, the role of criticism is "continue to criticize fraud, fraud, hallucinations" (2010: 354). Is Par? Socrates practice of Sia, the role of philosophy as a criticism is to prejudice the prejudice of the "common opinion", that is, is that trying to get thinking whether you really know that we know. Criticism is always self-criticism, self-care, and self-management In the Western tradition, the ancient philosophy was developed mainly by Socrates, Plato and Aristotle. However, the ancient philosophy included philosophy before Socrates, Hellenistic philosophy, and Roman philosophy. The Western ancient philosophy is different from the medieval philosophy. The medieval philosophy is influenced by Christianity and Islam. Ancient philosophies from non-Western traditions such as China and Indian philosophy often have strong ethical or religious concerns that remain a major part of today's tradition.

One of the expectations for this conference, expectation for all philosophical traditions of the world is to solve "human life, civilization and the life on the earth" by preserving traditional methods and prescription. In this article I will discuss the theme of the meeting in detail by considering the views of Johan Gottfried Herder and Hans Georg Gadmer on education and history. His religious loyalty was attacked, but Herder also supports the so-called pluralism today. Johann Gottfried Herder presents a very different perspective on human nature, human thought and motivation. In his book "Thought of Human History Philosophy" (1791), Heller showed the historical background of human nature. He provides a historical understanding of the nature of man and arguing the human nature itself is a historical product and humans have taken different actions at different times of historical development (1800-1877, 1791). Herder's view built the foundation of historical human philosophy found in the persons of Hegel and Nietzsche in the 19th century. His view also predicts the important idea of ​​the social world in the second half of the 20th century, "social construction" of humanity and social identity (Anderson 1983; Hacking 1999; Foucault 1971). Robert Bernasconi goes back to this philosophy to the philosophy of Johann Gottfried von Herder. He wrote an idea about the philosophy of human history (1784). Year). Helder (against Emanuel Kant) actually "refuses to divide people into races and insists that people divide more appropriately" (Bernasconi 2000, 23). Pastor believes that every group of people has made their own important contribution to civilization. The pastor insisted that the Negro is not an animal but a person, opposed the general view of the 18th century about civilization and race. He should say, "You should not oppress him, kill him, steal him, because he is like you ..." (Bernasconi 2000, 26)

Separating peace idealists I say Finney is the greatest idealist in this story. Many things about his feelings and many problems, I have made him think about him like this. Fanny's behavior in the novel showed him like the happiest person on Earth For example, when he said "no war", this is because he really did not suffer from war It shows that. I believe this means happiness. Finney has never lost confidence in his so-called friend Jean, he thinks he knows that Jean is always against him but he also praises him. The foundation of this theme - a general hypothesis linking idealists to realists (those who emphasize the long-term nature of political power and those measures) - is a country-centered universe with a large population of nations I am studying. To separate the idealist and the realist is that they use different methods to manage the system. The idealist / reformer believes that the system can be better reformed, improved and managed - they show how to do this. Realists believe that the reformists are misunderstanding the wrong, optimistic, and the essence of political power at the international level. From the ancient Greeks to the Renaissance Italy, the origin of the First World War, some people think that history has shown the existence of political conspiracy for centuries. From the beginning, pragmatists wanted to reform philosophy and want to make it better to follow the scientific method they understood. They believe that the philosophy of idealism and realism tends to express human knowledge as something beyond what science can master. They believe that these philosophies adopt phenomenology inspired by Kant, or adopt the corresponding theory of knowledge and truth. A pragmatist criticizes the former as transcendence, and the latter considers the correspondence as an unanalyzable fact. Practicalism tries to explain the relationship between intellectuals and known people.

Ethical problems on the subject of human research Phase 1 cancer related clinical trial How is personal history clinical trial done? Personal history May 9, 1999, Mother's Day, my mother Deborah Ann Hall was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer. I hope to pray some new and improved medicine for my mother and I spend most of my time in the church. I say "Everything is possible, something can happen, she can survive, new medicines and treatments are constantly evolving. Experimental problems of human subjects have been studied from a number of philosophical points of view. First of all, we consider the fundamental problems of human experiments as acceptable moral practices. Why use human ethical issues for human research? When we use inanimate objects and low life forms, what characteristics do human beings have to prove against the assumption of using humans in experiments? The two main ethical traditions of contemporary western philosophy by John Stuart Mill and Immanuel Kant suggest that they fundamentally have moral principles and are essential or essential of one or both of these basic attributes of human beings Emphasize value. Research on subjects and participants raises unique and complex moral, legal, social and political issues. Research ethics pay particular attention to the analysis of ethical issues raised by people as research participants. Research ethics has three goals. The first and widest goal is to protect human participants. The second goal is to ensure that research is done for the benefit of individuals, groups, and / or society as a whole. Finally, the third objective is to verify the ethical integrity of specific research activities and projects, and to study issues such as risk management, confidentiality, informed consent process.

Introduction considers Coleridge's aesthetics as a fragment (part) of the composition of a larger theoretical poet (whole), whether it is possible, productive or confusing. In other words, College's art criticism can be used to comment on his practice as a theorist. Whether his aesthetic concept applies to his practice as a critic of poetry practice. Is it possible to gain some leverage by distorting Coleridge's theoretical account of poetry and general art and evaluating his own composition as a critic? Because his generation wore a cultural critic's cloak, CS can trace to S.T. Coleridge (1772-1834), poets, critics and philosophers. Callridge came across William Wordsworth in 1795, the poets built deep friendships, they visited Germany from 1798 to 1999 (Coleridge became interested in German philosophy and criticism) , They cooperated. A lyrical song (1789), this poem collection shows the beginning of the romantic movement of British poetry. Coleridge wrote an emotional poem like "Ancient Sailor R" and "Kubla Khan", he shared interests in political philosophy in Biographia Literaria (1817) for many years, and introduced Kant there. Thanks to British philosopher Fichte for reflection philosophy on the distinction between understanding and reason, Reflection Aid (1825), and a series of views on various social and cultural topics Anima Poetae (1895). Samuel Taylor Coleridge (1772-1834) was a member of the British romantic poet and "Lake Poet". Coleridge 's famous poem includes ancient sailors Rime, Christabel and Kubla Khan. Coleridge helped England bring German idealistic concepts. (An important part of romanticism) Camille Saint-Saëns (1835 - 1921) French composer, conductor and pianist. The famous works include the 2nd piano concerto (1868), the 1st cello concerto (1872), the Danse Macabre (1874), the opera "Samson and Delilah" (1877), the 3rd violin concerto (1880) And so on. ) And "Animal carnival" (1887)

In this article we will compare the two opposite theories of Emmanuel Kant's absoluteistic moral ethics and Joseph Fletcher's relativistic situation ethics. Moral ethics focuses on obedience and behavior based on absolute order. This indicates that action is essentially good or bad. Situational ethics stipulates that no action is inherently good and should not act according to love. From this point of view, Kant's view is not as simple as Fletcher's view, but in reality all of them are related to the best results of human beings. Moral ethics focuses on behavior rather than results. It is still moral that the results are bad even if you act in good faith. Likewise, if the intention is bad, even if the result is the best, it is wrong in all situations and situations. If profit from action is the motive for action, it will deny any morality of good deeds "There are two newly growing praise and awe-inspiring things: starry sky and my internal moral law." Kant thinks that human beings are responsible for understanding moral law through rationality without mentioning the result and for people not to distract their emotions. If moral law stipulates that you should do something, that means you can do it. It is not our responsibility to do impossible things. Therefore, there is no reason not to comply with natural morality law. Kant sticks to the work of mankind and progresses towards the final goal of summarizing human virtue and happiness. This is what we call a total. Because it is impossible * Compare and contrast the application of two ethical theories in the ethical dilemma. Discuss why one of these theories is more effective than others. (50 points) In philosophy, the moral position is various. Many of them may affect the recognition of someone's ethical issues. The moral problem is euthanasia; it is called a moral question because it focuses on the right and wrong concepts that form the foundation of what we should do, the basis of morality. Since euthanasia is also a matter of life and death, it is a controversial matter. Because death is one of the major concerns of most individuals and cultures, what causes death will be controversial. The first question that arises is a good moral choice? If you have various opinions, can you decide what to do? If the nature and intention of action is considered good, is that behavior good? ... Read more http://www.markedbyteachers.com/as-and-a-level/religious-studies-and-filosophy/compare-and-contrast-the-application-of-two-ethical-theories-to-a-moral- Progress and dilemma discuss the most reasons for discussion - one - this - this theory - yes - it is more effective than the most other. html Compare and contrast the application of two ethical theories in the ethical dilemma. Discuss the argument that one of these theories is more effective than the other Explain the main principles of moral ideology and utilitarianism. Compare these two theories and clarify the problems and limitations found in each theory. Introduction: - Bio ethics scholars raise these questions in the context of modern medicine, change the way society experiences that meaning, understand the progress of science and medicine, and are secular and religious in order to help catch up We use many traditions. Health ... The utilitarianism of crime and punishment The mathematical evaluation of the moral dilemma proposed by Dostoevsky's "crime and punishment" by Raskolnikov reflects the experience of utilitarianism. Utilitarianism tries to distinguish between good and evil by measuring decisions based on its calculated value. Raskolnikov seems to adopt fundamental principles of utilitarianism and will have the negative consequences of killing his old landlord. Morality is somewhat difficult to define, but it is in contrast to ethical theories such as utilitarianism, often based on moral judgment about results and outcomes. (Generally speaking, this ethical theory is called result-based, Utilitarian

... ... It is not a big concept, it begins with the concept of God. The idea that such existence exists only in thought and does not actually exist includes contradiction. Because existence of lack of actual existence is not without big presence. ... Descartes proved the existence of God as soon as possible. However, Descartes does not know that this evidence does not contain errors unless he believes his clear and clear understanding of the step of reasoning is correct. Therefore, clarity and standard of independent recognition, René Descartes 'Discussion on God's Presence Rene Descartes' questions about the existence of God are related to his rationalistic deduction reasoning. Descartes concluded that the truth about the existence of God exists within his understanding of the perfect God and the nature of God (as a perfect being, it must exist for perfection) . - All moral arguments about the existence of God are based on the principle that all of us share the common sense of morality. Despite cultural differences, in a broad sense, people all over the world have ambiguous thoughts about right and wrong; the moral argument to the existence of God is that this mutual understanding is evidence of the existence of God I will say that there is. Immanuel Kant advocated this argument (not a moral argument); a god as a source of objective morality Before attempting to explain and evaluate the moral argument about God's existence, it is beneficial to understand the purpose of God's existential argument. Of course, although views on this are diverse, most contemporary supporters believe that these discussions do not regard theological argument as "evidence." They should provide valid arguments and prerequisites that reasonable people can not deny. Such Success Criteria clearly sets high criteria for success, and proponents of the argument of the argument almost fail in the fields other than formal logic, philosophical discussions of interesting conclusions to meet such criteria It correctly points out that. Is the premise of these arguments reasonable, at least for reasonable people, more reasonable than refusal? Discussion that is most widely accepted and criticized about the existence of God. My purpose of this article is to explain why the cosmological argument is proof of the existence of God, to understand that it is the importance of the posteriori controversy, and to my common objection It is to observe the position of. First of all, as a living person on earth, we can safely conclude that most of the things that exist today have their cause. I confirmed that there is a reason.

An overview of John Rawls and social contract. John Rawls combines the earlier traditional social contract approach with more modern usage to create a chaotic social philosophical renaissance. Professor Rawls is not a reason to advocate civic authority or a form to adopt, but I am more interested in the principle of promoting a basic social system - though it assumes authority, but focuses on animation I am counting on you. In short, Rawls believes that "justice and fairness" should be the basic animation principle. The social contract theory began as a description of the origins and legitimacy of the country, especially in the works of Hobbes and Rock, but later thinkers like Rousseau, Emmanuel Kant and John Rawls also applied social contract theory. On the international stage (partly explains Grotius's international justice in the "Law of War and Peace"). In these applications, the state replaces citizens as parties to social contracts. The judicial part of social contract theory is based on the international treaties such as "Geneva Convention on Prisoner Handling" (if the country agrees with humanitarian treatment of prisoners) or the right to UN human rights declaration (States promise to realize various human rights) Can be used to review the provisions of the Convention In 1971, John Rawls promoted social contracts to regain attention by announcing the "justice theory". Later, he extended the model of "justice theory" to the international stage of the People's Law. Rawls uses a social contract model. And that calls him "justice and fairness" in the context of the country and "people's rule" at the international stage. Rawls' statement is purely normative and does not pretend to be an accurate descriptive statement about how each country interacts indeed. He explained his argument as the "ideal theory" of pursuing "realistic utopia." John Rawls' view of civil disobedience is different from Martin Luther King. He believes democracy is a social contract. He does not believe that people are "groups" with individual identities. In fact, Rawls argues that in democratic society, people who originally signed a social contract did not know their social, economic, or ethnic differences. He called it "pure veil" (Rolls). The primitive principle of these hypotheses agrees with the form of governance that treats everyone equally according to law. Since this contract includes democracy, a constitution is necessary. This includes the legislators who are responsible for making the law. Sometimes the law is unfair. However, as part of social contracts, citizens also signed the profit that democracy provides to them. As a result, citizens must comply with unfair laws

In this paper, we investigate and analyze the role of Judaism in the value of image day / human dignity, especially in the context of bioethics. Two major topics were discussed. The first is a comparative analysis of the Anthropological and Ethical Concepts of Image Day as Jewish and Western Thought (Christian and Secular European Values). The Jewish tradition stands out the human body, especially its reproductive function and appearance, and it is in the center of Image Day. The second is the day's role as a moral value for others. In Rabbi · Judaism, respecting human dignity is not the main morality code but secondary worth of love, sometimes other moral laws and values. The doctrine of Christian human dignity can change the current dialogue. Women and children, citizens and immigrants, blacks and whites - it provides a solid foundation to protect everyone's dignity and value. Image Day means that you do not have to choose between conservative and progressive biases. Christian way of doing is a better choice. This is a new, more stable position. The Christian way means that you refuse to reduce the dignity of someone's life for others. No one is a consumable item. Christy Britton expressed an alternative to Christianity. She wrote: "Professional life is of course anti-abortion, which means paying attention to the life from the uterus to the tomb, which supports a group that is disadvantageously boldly contradicting the world's value system " In this paper, we investigate and analyze the role of Judaism in the value of image day / human dignity, especially in the context of bioethics. Two major topics were discussed. The first is a comparative analysis of the Anthropological and Ethical Concepts of Image Day as Jewish and Western Thought (Christian and Secular European Values). The Jewish tradition stands out the human body, especially its reproductive function and appearance, and it is in the center of Image Day. The second is the day's role as a moral value for others. In Rabbi · Judaism, respecting human dignity is not the main morality code but secondary worth of love, sometimes other moral laws and values. Beliefs on where dignity comes from differ between different philosophical and religious systems. Christians believe that human beings are built in the statue of God and have dignity. This is called Imagodei (pronounced ee - marg - oh day). Kant believes that humans are so rational that they have dignity. Others believe that dignity is a way to recognize our common humanity. Some people say that this is the social structure that we create. Regardless of its origin, this concept has had an impact in today's political and ethical discourse.

Breakthrough progress brought about by the scientific revolution has had a great influence on enlightenment. If courageous people dare to oppose the established way of thinking, enlightenment can not be realized. These people take risks and are placed under public supervision. They not only asked questions about the function of our world, but also designed a new scientific method to reveal the new truth of our existence. From the 16 th century to the 17 th century, to answer the questions they no longer rely on religious doctrines and mystical customs but developed their own assumptions. For enlighten thinkers, however, enlightenment is not a historical period, it is a process of social, psychological, spiritual development regardless of time or place. Immanuel Kant's article "Answer to this question: What is enlightenment?" Defines "enlightenment" in his famous contribution to the debate on this issue. (1784), human beings are freed from self-immaturity; "Immature means that you can not use your own understanding without the guidance of others." Kant said broad opinion among thinkers of thinking We shared the differences. Think about yourself, trust with your own intelligence and promise to decide how to act. Even Kant's famous Enlightenment paper that appeared in the same journal in 1784 did not start with philosophical argument but rather a title of the title to make the reader read another article published in December 1783 Add footnotes just below. In the order of the footnote "What is enlightenment?", This article will lead the reader to another article on enlightenment from September of that year. Traditional understanding of enlightenment is based on self-legislation and rational autonomy, but all these footnotes indicate that rationality of enlightenment is related to printing technology from the beginning. Pope Alexandre was a British poet in the 18th century. A paper on people is one of his most famous works, a good example of enlightenment. It is divided into 4 letters. This is a good example of enlightenment. Because he is trying to understand the universe and the importance he will give for reasoning in the structure. This order depends on the level of God, angels, and humans, animals, and ultimately plants. Because of their reasoning ability, this poem places humans in animals and plants in the rank of the universe. Understanding this reasoning is one of the main ideas of enlightenment. You need to help as soon as possible !! The best reward for enlightenment ideas to get the best answer Encourage the control of rationality and irrationality. How can the Papers 'Human Paper' best reflect the ideal of Enlightenment, and why?

Plato, Aristotle, Augustine and Nietzsche all have their own ideas and can be happy in his / her life. Everyone has similarities beyond Nietzsche, and they are totally contradictory to others. Plato said that it is happiness to understand virtue. In other words, virtue is enough and necessary to satisfy happiness. He also intuitively believes that human reasoning takes precedence over spiritual elements and human appetite. The argument of Aristotle was related to Plato, but he built more for it and found his own answer. The word "moral" is derived from the Greek word "ethos" (meaning "custom" or "custom"). Morality is different from morality and morality, while morality indicates their practice, while morality refers to correct behavior and better good theory. Morality is not limited to specific behavior and defined moral principles, but includes moral ideals and whole actions, human life philosophy (or Weltanschauung). The question is "How should people act?" (Normative or normative ethics), "Do you think that people are right? (Writing ethics)," How to practice moral knowledge " . Applied ethics) and "right thing" (meta ethics). For details on these categories, please see the following. In everyday conversation, we do not distinguish between moral, moral obligations, moral obligations, moral obligations, moral principles and moral principles. But in philosophy, we can distinguish between morality and morality based on the level of analysis that is expected. Ethical management behavior tells us to follow the rules and pay attention to the fundamental responsibilities we are holding our lives. Morality tells us we will not steal things; people trying to steal are not morally stolen, and those who habitually yield to that temptation are immoral. Morality is mainly discipline, related to the form of inference rather than behavior, reflects, compares, analyzes, and follows the logical relation between the basic principle and the moral responsibility leading us . Ethics provides these tasks Introduction â € œ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| | | | | | | | | | Ethics (also known as moral philosophy) is a philosophical field to solve moral problems. The term "moral" is often used interchangeably as "moral" and sometimes more narrowly used to express the moral principles of a particular tradition, group or individual. Likewise, certain moral theories, especially moral ethics, distinguish ethics from morality. "The morals and ethics of people are the same, but there is a usage that limits morality to institutions such as Emmanuel Kant, based on concepts such as responsibilities, duties, principles, etc. To further advance Aristotle's practical inference approach, Concepts based on virtue often protect ethics and often avoid separating "moral" considerations from other practical considerations.

The romantic era opera was a dramatic drama era. In the field of "beautiful song", singer is important and replacement is considered to be almost impossible, so the concept of singer in opera will change forever. Singer's voice is very precious, and Italian composers such as Rossini, Dnizetti and Bellini create opera, and show sound, color, range and flexibility. These Italian composers have removed the composer Rossini who created the stage for the ordinary composition style at the time and many other fans. The Belcanto movement flourished in the early 19th century, examples of which include Rossini, Bellini, Donizetti, Pacini, Mercadante and many other operas. Literally means "famous song", the way of vocal singing comes from the Italian song school of the same name. The Bel canto collection is usually gorgeous and complex, requiring extreme flexibility and pitch control. The Belganto style famous opera includes Rossi's Il barbiere di Siviglia and La Cenerentola, and Donizetti's Lucia di Lammermoor. In the early 19th century, Italian composers such as Rossini, Donizetti, Bellini produced a so-called Bell Kant's school opera and are providing their voice and expressiveness to famous singers. It is a wonderful opportunity to see the spectacular scenery. Opera, Agile, who led Giuseppe Verdi (1813-1901), is still popular today, romantic opera of Puccini including La Boheme. German opera began to flourish in the 19th century with Carl Maria von Weber and his opera actor Dare Freischutz (Freelancer), a popular episode based on German history and folklore, including elements of German fairytales It was. German opera world giant is Wagner, its complicated and long operators dominate this era and have great influence in the 20th century. Since the days of Handel and Mozart many composers have supported the use of Italian as the language of the script of the opera. From the Bell Kant era to Verdi, the composer sometimes oversees their opera versions in Italian and French. For this reason, operas such as Lucia di Lammermoor and Don Carlos are considered typical in both French and Italian versions today. Until the mid 1950's, they were able to use translations to make operas, even though these operas were not approved by composers and original writers. For example, the Italian opera house often sings Wagner in Italian. After World War II, the opera scholarship has been improved, and the artists have once again focused on the original version, and the translation has gone out of support. Understanding European languages, especially Italian, French and German, has become an important part of professional singer training. "The greatest opera training is linguistics and musicology," explains mezzo-soprano Dolora Zajick.

John Stuart Mill's utilitarian John Stuart Miller translates morality into a practical problem in utilitarianism. His moral theory is aimed at helping people evaluate his moral principles and appeal and to judge conflicts in moral conflict. Mill believes that behavior is right as they tend to promote happiness and reduce pain. This theory is expressed as a legitimate promotion of happiness. Moral "right" behavior is to bring maximum happiness and pain relief to most people. Utilitarian philosopher John Stuart Mill criticized Kant as it does not recognize that moral law is proved by moral intuition based on utilitarian principles (maximum maximum profit is sought Should be). Muller believes that Kant's morality can not explain why specific behavior is wrong without relying on Utilitarianism. As a basis of morality, Mill believes that his utility principle has a stronger intuitive foundation than Kant's dependence on reason, and why explaining better why specific behavior is wrong or wrong I can. Utilitarianism by John Stuart Mill, originally published as three independent papers in 1861 and then published as a collection in 1863, is one of the most famous Utilitarian ethics tests so far. Long-term debate about ethical tradition opens sentences. And there is a general lack of great progress. He could not reach any agreement on the philosopher's decision to be "right" or "wrong", understanding of society's morals remained unchanged in the study of philosophy over generations of generations I pointed out. He explains this lack of change by implying that all morals have a philosophical basis, and this foundation is Utilitarianism: moral action promotes happiness without happiness and pain It is a belief.

Frederick Douglas' s appeal power Frederick Douglas chose to promote the abolition of slavery by talking about the behavior and influence brought about by the system after escaping from slavery. In an excerpt from Rochester's speech in New York on July 5, 1852, Douglas asked the following question. This problem is very bold and requires attention. The validity of his speech arises from his personal appeal to the audience. Frederic Douglas's "July 4th" speech was the most famous speech by Frederick Douglas, who claims discontinentists and citizenship. It collected 500 to 600 people. Douglas talked to slaves on July 4th and showed slaves that they have nothing to celebrate. They are not free, and independence celebrated elsewhere in the country does not apply to them. "When we ask now whether we are living in the age of enlightenment now, the answer is" No, but I am living in the age of enlightenment "(Kant). Enlightenment is a concept often discussed in modern society research. Because it makes society challenge society to accept criticism of social justice. However, due to the restrictions of the ruling party, there is a tension between the enlightenment goal and the actual enlightenment process. Comparing Frederick Douglas and Charles Langston through the history of the United States, many influential and historical figures provided important speech to influence people's views. For example, Frederick Douglass and Charles Langston are powerful speakers who attempt to convince white society that the abolition of slavery should be abolished. Among the two distinctive lecturers, Douglas is more convincing and frank than Langston. - Harlem Renaissance until the first half of the 20th century, white artists dominated the world of poetry. Caucasian poetry on Caucasian experience is the only poem that most people have ever heard. With the arrival of the Harlem Renaissance of the 1920's, the world of this relatively cultural American poetry rocked.

Enlightenment awareness raising in the 18th century and politician enlightenment was an exciting historical era. For the first time since ancient Greece, reason and logic are the center of the most elaborate social thinking. The discovery and understanding of the replaced religion as an impulsive ideal of this age, and the high social scene in Europe, intense debate about these new ideas still exist. French playwright named after pseudonvoltel is the most famous and controversial enlightenment writer. Progress of Enlightenment With the arrival of 1900, many changes are taking place. New leaders, government styles, and new ideas have just begun. The focus of Age of Enlightenment was based on reason, rationalism, and the concept of "unavoidable progress". Enlightenment was driven by Kant, Bulgaria, Thomas Jefferson, Isaac Newton, François Marie Aduwe Voltaire, Thomas Hobbes, and other wonderful people. - The main reason for enlightenment is the scientific revolution and it is believed that social and political sectors may achieve a similar breakthrough if the same method is used for its many accomplishments in science I will. For example, philosophers like David Hume are trying to preserve the moral "autonomy" related to religion. In this view, God and the future country are unnecessary for moral life and human society. John Locke and Thomas Jefferson Have you heard about Age of Enlightenment in history? This is important when people begin thinking new things in technology, science, politics, and philosophy. Enlightenment has also brought many unforgettable thinkers that continue to influence us today. Among these thinkers are very clever John Rock and Thomas Jefferson. Self-defense is part of the law of nature; it can not deny to the community and even to the king himself.

In this article, I will explore two arguments about the subject of the existence of God. In particular, I will focus on St. Thomas Aquinas' effective causal argument about the existence of God and the opposite of Bertrand Russell. After analyzing Aquinas' claims and Russell 's objections, we show how Russell' s objection failed. Aquinas said there are five ways to prove the existence of God, one of which is through effective causation. His premise is that all the effects we observe must be caused by other factors. The first argument about the existence of monotheism is St. Ansel's ontology. Anselm believes that perfection needs to be present. Monotheism god exists because it is perfect. However, St. Thomas Aquinas dismissed this claim. Descartes and Libby Chin reconfirmed and expanded Anselm 's argument, but later Kant believed that its existence was not a true predicate. Norman Malcolm provided further discussion. Because someone can not be perfect. Even if it exists in some way it may be perfect, but there is no such thing. But I think that it is better for true goddess and god than monotheists. St. Thomas Aquinas presented five arguments to prove the existence of God. However, this article focuses on the fifth argument. The fifth argument is considered a theoretical argument and pointed out that those lacking wisdom act for purpose. The fifth argument satisfies the existence of the god of Aquinas, but among modern readers Aquinas will argue that it ignores the laws of physics. - Our initial work was group discussion, but at first it was difficult, but I found it easier to imagine it. Teamwork helped improve my communication skills, but I confirmed that I have a lot to learn, and communication between me and my partner is really necessary for the success and completion of the discussion.

Decline of authority When Alice looked for glasses across wonderlands, she encountered various personality and her absurd claims cast doubt on her implicit assumption. The strange logic these characters brought to Alice forced her to acknowledge and reevaluate the objective truth she had previously accepted. As Carol's absurdness is exaggerated with an observable phenomenon in society but has identifiable similarity, this discrepancy makes sense, meaningless to Alice (and reader) that Carol's Have the experience of the essence of the satire. Epiphany Before the autumn of 2003 to 2004, the universe (such as a great architect) sent us to Grand Rapids, Montana, USA - they actually put the hydropower dams in several Missouri states. The waterfall is on the river near the Great Falls, Montana State. The geological and practical nature of these geological features, and the amazing integration of this geographical feature, were initially considered valuable named after the town of Great Falls. Each waterfall in Missouri Province in Cascade County has a hydroelectric dam. I think there is a total of 5 dams per 15 miles in Missouri. Historians have been fascinated by the decline of great civilizations like ancient Greece and Rome. However, for human beings, corruption does not include lessons less important than the collapse of the United States, ending the era of virtue and leading the entire planet into the second dark era. The philosophical power that ultimately destroyed the United States was released even before the birth of the country. His philosophical skepticism of 1748 "David Hume" will not rise tomorrow, the proposition is equally understandable, which means that it does not contradict it any more. In 1781, he wrote, "Purely rational criticism of Emmanuel Kant finds it necessary to deny knowledge to make room for faith," he wrote. Publications five years after the establishment of the United States of America

The most important difference between Aristotle and Hobbes, and between classical and contemporary political philosophy about happiness and happiness is normative judgment on happiness. Hobbes dismisses canonical judgment about better life and argues human behavior without attribution of moral quality, but Aristotle is the opposite. In ethics, Aristotle distinguishes between actions of good and evil and the best interests or sums of all human beings, Hobbes believes that the difference between good and evil is different among individuals and good is an individual's appetite or desire. Things, evil is the thing of his hate and disgust. Aristotle and Hobbes formed discussions between two great thinkers at two completely different times. Aristotle (384 - 322 BC) was part of the Greeks, but more precisely Athens' golden age, Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679) experienced the British civil war in the 1640s. Let's be one of the most influential philosophers. Based on their own personal experience and circumstances, Aristotle and Hob formulated the idea that human equality should be maintained. However Thomas Hobbes vs. Emmanuel Kant Part 1: Thomas Hobbes "Everyone has their own reasons and what can be misused can help him protect his life from his enemies. Si , 120) Thomas Hobbes, considered a reasonable egoist, mentioned this in his book "Leviathan". Hobbes believes that people's behavior depends only on the ultimate influence on that person. Our ultimate ethical responsibility comes from our own interests. Thomas Hobstomas Hobbes is an important person in contributing to the Constitution. Born on 5th April 1588 in Westport, Wiltshire, England, died on 4 December 1679 in Hadwick, England. Hobbs' uncle has sponsored his education at Oxford University. In 1604, Hobbes' father also appointed Thomas Hobbes, left the family, never returned. There are three brothers and sisters, two brothers and one sister in Hobbes. He wrote three major works; De corpore (finally published in 1655)

Moral philosophy I. Sam had problems when the stock market fell to a steep slope. Not only did he lose the majority of millions, he was exposed to the fact that he was engaged in financial action. One evening, he was found in the office and was a victim of suicide. People who attended his funeral included his wife, children and his business partner. B) In this particular situation Sam is because the agent committed suicide because it lost millions on the stock market. In the field of morality, or moral philosophy, research can systematically describe the theory of what causes correct behavior or wrong behavior. Moral philosophy is usually divided into three categories: meta ethics, applied ethics, normative ethics. Meta-ethics studies our moral value, where language and principles derive; is it "moral" rather than "moral"? And provide a practical solution to ethical problems. Normology ethics studies ethical standards that influence legitimacy and fraud. The theory of normative ethics includes utilitarianism, consequentialism, contractileism, virtue ethics, and so on. Ethics (also known as moral philosophy) is a philosophical field to solve moral problems. The term "moral" is often used interchangeably with "moral" and sometimes it is used more narrowly to express the moral principles of a particular tradition, group or individual. It distinguishes between ethics and morality. "The morals and ethics of people are the same, but there is a usage that limits morality to institutions such as Emmanuel Kant, based on concepts such as responsibilities, duties, principles, etc. To further advance Aristotle's practical inference approach, Concepts based on virtue often protect ethics and often avoid separating "moral" considerations from other practical considerations.

In the encyclopedia article, there are background and summary materials such as facts, dates, events, brief explanations. They are usually written by scholars, especially scholars found in professional academic encyclopedia. The articles of encyclopedia have not undergone formal review process By contrast, journal articles are based on their own research and are designed to advance academic discussion. They give new knowledge to the field of research. They are usually peer reviewed, but they are not always The database recommended here provides articles on encyclopedia. These are the homework necessary to provide introductory materials to read the lesson. Mosaic I (GY) intellectual heritage 0851, 0951 Students explore the essence of human society expressed in philosophical, psychological, religious, and political texts by speaking with examples of art and literature. Theme: Travel, self and others, community, faith. Mosaic II INTELLECTUAL HERITAGE 0852,0952 Students continue to process texts from a variety of cultures, history and disciplines, expanding research on human society into the universe, and from extensive textual analysis to broader scientific discourse, philosophical and ethical I will move on to thinking. Theme: Science, Power, Money, Environment / City A common heritage of mankind (also known as the common heritage of mankind, the common heritage of mankind, or the common heritage principle) should trust the areas and elements (culture and nature) defined by common human heritage I believe that is the principle of international law. We will protect future generations from exploitation by individual countries and companies. Emmanuel Kant argued in his essay "Toward Eternal Peace" that expansion of hospitality through "use of Earth's rights belonging to mankind" finally brings humanity closer to the constitution of the capital. However, the concept of common human heritage was first mentioned in the preamble of the 1954 Hague Convention on the Protection of Cultural Heritage during Armed Conflict.

Frederick Douglas has acquired the ability to read in a non-traditional environment that is not slave and free. Before he could read, he really could not doubt his position. He began thinking outside the box until he began to read and educate himself and began to "become enlightened" according to the definition of Emmanuel Kant; he said "from a self-generated minority Rise "and" enlightenment "was defined. Frederick Douglas wrote: "As I read, I can hate slavery and hate slavery ... When I am suffering from this tingling and torture of knowledge, this knowledge is I opened my eyes to see horrible holes and revealed the scary dragon's teeth ready to attack me (my bondage and my freedom ch.XI) Likewise, Malcolm X was in a state of oppression when he started his education, which allowed him to achieve similar enlightenment like Frederick Douglas. Like Douglas, Malcolm X started with a bit of reading and writing skills. But they all strongly desire to learn. For Malcom, reading was that he ran away from prison, which helped him spend his time. As he said, "I have been away from prison ever since, and if I am not in the library, I am reading my shop" (3). Reading makes it possible to allow him to access books to build his own vocabulary and help them understand slavery atrocities. This eventually allowed him to reach a higher level of thought and ultimately became a leader in the African American community. Both of them had a humble beginning when it came to their education. With a small resource like Frederick Douglas, Malcolm X can continue to receive education and form an enlightenment form that will benefit "black people" and help them (Malcolm X 6) Most people learn to read and write using classrooms and classroom workbooks. Frederick Douglass and Malcolm X do not have these benefits. Frederick Douglas and Malcolm X have major obstacles, but reading and writing are possible. There are some differences in literacy rates, but similarities are most prominent. They all learned their own reading and writing, became an independent thinker in the process, which had a great influence on others. Frederick Douglass and Malcolm X are very witty and independent in the process of literacy skills. They are diligent because they spend more time they learn. "Because slaves were taught to read ... this is almost an unacceptable crime," the slave owner deliberately did not allow education as a means of slavery repression (Douglas 146). His mistress did not understand this habit and taught him alphabet before her husband stopped class. By reading and writing, Frederick and Malcol continue to live in the process of growth. Both Frederick Douglass and Malcolm X noticed that the knowledge of reading and writing by Hend Frederick makes him smarter and smarter. Rather than becoming a slave like him, he saw something better with knowledge. He wants to be better than a slave better than a slave. However, reading and writing as Malcolm X opens a new world. It is better than using street wear with gorgeous clothes and crime. In the last analysis, as a story of Malcolm autobiography and Frederick Douglas, Frederick Douglass and Malcolm X both represent the importance of learning how to read and write about their personal development and social definition. Consciousness, abolition and its role in civil rights movement. They explained that words have the ability to move people, change people, and more importantly to release them. Malcolm X said, "I have never lived freely in my life" (11), "Reading has changed my way of life forever ... When I wake up in my heart, You can last long. " Hobbies are enthusiastic about spiritual energy "(paragraph 40). The permanent importance and centrality of these works against African-American literature, especially American literature, generally supports the author's conclusion.

This is what Philosopher John Campbell at the University of California at Berkeley thinks about philosophy - "It breaks, explains, and evaluates the behavior we usually do at a very fast rate ... and obviously alternative planning is Is possible. Research philosophy is to solve human problems for thousands of years while talking to several great thinkers I have lived so far. Students will take time to learn philosophy, whether they are only one course or the last course. This is one of the most valuable intellectual experience at university. So, the main reason to study philosophy is to find out introspective values ​​in introspection and thinking. However, many undergraduates who are attracted to philosophy are worried that the philosophical degree is the way to poverty. But in fact, your skills to study philosophy are very marketable, especially in an unstable and rapidly changing economic environment. In any case, most people eventually will change jobs in life many times. Clear thinking skills and clear writing power, clarification of unpredictable assumptions, clarification of complicated ideas, organization of ties and influences, and skill in broad context are always required. See things and challenge orthodox. In short, philosophy gives you the skills to work for every job. Harvard philosophy concentrates on pursuing diverse and rewarding occupations. Philosophy graduates are successful in law, finance and consulting, business, Internet startup companies, medicine, journalism, art, nonprofit work, education and academia (philosophy and other fields). It is not a question of "What can we do with philosophical degrees?" Why is philosophy? For the study of philosophy, "love of wisdom", creation and development of thoughtful thinking, I suggest that Aristotle can accept ideas without accepting it, as suggested. In the philosophical worldview, Republicans who oppose tax hikes and economic stimulus measures can at least consider the concept of tax increases and Keynesian economics. Democrats who face the opposite idea can do the same. Thoughts, not anger, may be the default response to the world view. Indeed, philosophy can do a lot to alleviate the growing anger like a modern American cancer tumor. These tools exist in the East and West ideas - accepted in the absolute order of Stoic's prophecy, Buddhist meditation, transcendence of humanitarian reason, Kant. In the words of Socrates, philosophy helps to plant virtues in us. Religious philosophy is an interface between philosophy on the one hand and theological and religious studies on the other. It belongs to theological and religious studies by that subject, and by that way belongs to philosophy. How we look at religious philosophy depends on how we view the mother's subjects. Let's assume that philosophy is an abstract analysis, in some sense the ultimate concept. One way to define religious philosophy is to say that the philosophy of science is an analysis of the concepts encountered in religion, as it is an analysis of the concepts encountered in science. Then there is a question of what these concepts are. What do we think about theology and religious studies? A good candidate for philosophical analysis can argue that it is a concept of religion itself. But only a few religious philosophers took time to study this problem. Greek religion is the beginning of Greek philosophy and the beginning of many great philosophers. The lack of stimulation in Greek religion is the main reason philosophical research is very popular in Greek culture. The study of religious philosophy is because people like Socrates do not understand why things are and why they should. The lack of religion is the reason people and philosophers question the moral choices people follow. - A wonderful religion and philosophy: Greek philosophy In the 6th century BC Greek philosophy began dualism. The development of Greek philosophy is a compromise between Greek monaural theory and the in

In two great expressive poetries in America, free verses fired: a transcendental movement in the middle of the 19th century, including Henry David Thoreau, influenced in the 1950s and 1960s, Beatnik Alan Ginsburg, Gregory Poetry when Kosso, aging is an influencer William Carlos Williams and other people occupied the central stage. Indeed, hundreds of high school teachers and college poet professors can thank for free poetry - and free-form free poetry written by folk musicians in the 1960s - to encourage students to write poems . Compared to other forms of poetry, free verses can feel liberation. A line has no specific number of syllables or rhymes; the section is not affected by the standard number of lines. In fact, poetry is not binding at all, and many free verses have a single section of thousands of words. The movement of free verse depends on the natural rhythm rather than the imposed pattern. As D. Lawrence wrote, the poet "can get rid of the stereotype of exercise". Free poetry seems to be modernistic, but its roots can go back to medieval scriptures and even the Bible. The Bible "Song of Songs" is written in what we call now free poetry. Many of the earliest ancient Greek poets were writing syllables and music in ways that were not measurable, and they were developing lyrics. But later in ancient Greece and Rome, formal form like Carol, epic, and various measured lyrics dominated land of literature. The promise of irregular rhythm continued to attract non-traditional and narrative poets, and began to appear in the 19th century French poet Jules La Foldze and Gustav Kant. John Wolfgang von Goethe in Germany also tried free poetry. By the second half of the century, Walter Whitman mastered this form as well as a minstrel like Christina Rosetti, Robert Louis Stevenson, Charles Borrer, Gerrard Manley Hopkins and W.E. Henry is writing a free poem. However, it was not that time that Richard Aldington made the English name using the word "free verse" in election in 1915. But as TS Eliot warned, "Poetry is not free for those who want to do a good job." Free poetry is irregular and lyrical and is not affected by lines or festivals. Measurement, but the accuracy of rhythm and rhythm is as important as other forms of poetry We are used to finding rhymes and meters in English poetry, but Hebrew poetry is different. The Hebrew poems are characterized by parallelism. For explanation, parallelism can be seen if more than two Hebrew poems correspond closely to each other. There are three main parallel processes in Hebrew poetry. Parallel processing of synonyms, the opposite of parallel processing, and parallel processing of synthesis. Parallel processing of synonyms is probably the most comprehensible one. Parallel processing of synonyms expresses the same thing in various ways and tells its teachings. It is not one of the books of wisdom, but Jesus prayed in Matthew 6: 13, "To save us from sin, not to tempt us." Prayer allows us to pray to God in the same way in two different ways. That is, he will protect us from a complete attack of evil. Parallel does not mean that the Lord can seduce us (see James 1: 13). Brunosner explains the sentimentalism of the poet of the egalism as an exaggerated miraculous thought. Its best representative is Carimacos and the poem does not show that "the early writers who really surprised the children remembered the miracles of life", but "the harmony from the people who studied the lost treasure Height of skepticism that expressed spirit ". In Kalimakos hymns, this double consciousness is achieved through a group of narrators that the story should not be understood as a poem that satisfies his own poetry, but should be understood as an agent's appearance. I gained the role of natural guardian, witness, and avenger.

Max Weber is one of the founders of sociology. In his most famous work "The spirit of Protestant ethics and capitalism," he claims that capitalist seed belongs to Protestant occupational ethics. But Weber was also an economist and saw the distinctive features of advanced capitalism in extensive division of labor and hierarchical management like the political bureaucracy just as it did in Germany before the First World War . Both of these features combine to create a new middle class whose position is dependent on human capital rather than physical capital and labor. However, in advanced capitalism, Weber believes that companies and entrepreneurs are at risk of the source of great progress (see entrepreneurial spirit). Weber accepted criticism of Ludwig von Mises' socialist economic plan and joined his own argument. Under the socialist system he believes that workers will still work hierarchically, but I believe that this hierarchy will be integrated with the government. He foresaw the dictatorship of the officials, not the dictatorship of the workers. Like David Hume in front of him, Weber believes in the possibility of social science without value. Therefore, what he means is that people can not find a way that the world should be simple by studying the world. Weber does not exclude that the normative analysis is viable or worth - he believes in a reasonable argument of value - he just wants an economist to distinguish between facts and values Born in Germany, Weber studied law in France and continued his postgraduate work at a medieval trading company in Italy and Spain. He was appointed Chairman of the political economy of Freiburg in 1894 and was appointed another Chairman of Heidelberg's political economy in 1896. He suffered a spiritual collapse in 1898 and did not continue his studies until 1904. He is a private scholar mainly in Heidelberg since 1904. Max Weber was born on April 21, 1864. His father, Max Weber Sr, is a politically active lawyer who prefers "world pleasure" and his mother Helene Fallenstein Weber wants a more abusive life. It is a way. The conflict arising in their marriage had a great influence on Max. Nevertheless, their houses are filled with excellent intellectuals and lively words. In the process of growing, he was tired of school and despised the teacher, but he himself swallowed classical literature. Born on 21 April 1864 in Erfurt, Thuringia, Max Weber was the eldest son of Max Weber and Helenfalenstein Weber. Max Weber was suffering from meningitis at the age of 4 and he read as his past time and developed his academic ability as a young man (Secher 1980). Max Weber majored in law in 1882 at the University of Heidelberg. However, as a military officer volunteered to participate in military training, his education was interrupted. In 1884 he retrained in 1890 and graduated (Secher 1980). He was a professor of economics at the University of Freiburg in 1894. After he married Mariannechniker for one year, Marianschnigger was a senior prostitute of Max Weber. Ironically, Weber suffered from long-term psychosis and declined work during the 1897 career peak (Gerth & Mill 1982). Max Weber, Junior Born in 1864 Germany, Erfurt. He is Max Weber, Senior. The biggest of eight children born with Helene Fallenstein Weber. Max Junior is a sick child. At the age of 4, he was suffering from meningitis. Although he finally recovered, due to the rest of his life he suffered from physical and emotional sequelae of illness, most notably anxiety and nervous tension. From a very young age, books are at the heart of Weber's life. He read everything he can get, including Kant, Machiavelli, Spinoza, Goethe and Chopin Howell, who wrote two historical articles before his 14th birthday. However, Weber pays little attention in the lesson, and there are few jobs to go to school. According to his legacy Marian, "His teachers are not civilized, but he does not respect them."

Through doubt and doubt, Descartes cast an easy and complicated question. Shocked by all the lies he believed, Descartes certainly began to rationally decide what could exist without a doubt. Descartes doubts everything so that his customary view and false knowledge do not hinder the ability to truly perceive things. As far as the body is concerned, our senses tell us that when the ligament outside the body and the substance together create the body. However, when we are skeptical and suspicious of all previous knowledge, we can not prove that our physical existence is deceived by our sense. Even if there is a suspicion of existence ... more content After the wax melted, all the waxes (their color, taste, fragrance) were removed, but the idea of ​​wax remained. But our wisdom, our only reasoning and understanding ability will tell us that it is the same wax. We know that it is the same wax after it melts, but the flame makes it look different from it. If solids and dissolved waxes are the same, how does intelligence know this? Descartes concluded that his ability to understand wax is not only through sensations acquired by the body but also from his own intelligence inference and understanding. In order to judge what is certain, we must doubt all previous knowledge and beliefs. With doubt on everything, the sensation gained by the body becomes unreliable, and all remaining emotions are reliable nature of thought and intelligence. In order for us to understand through sensation, we must have ideas. The belief that thinking exists enables self creation, the power of intelligence and thinking. The difference between self, thinking ability, and everything else is that it is beyond doubt. Contrary to Descartes, Buddhist philosophy refuses to accept the concept of self. According to Buddhism, there is a self that means there is a part that you can control. So, I am not saying "I do not think that I am thinking like this". Rene Descartes says "About methodology" (Cartesian 1637). I think it is quite obvious as I think I will exist. Through our thinking, we provide evidence of our existence. But Jill Bolte Taylor added her idea to TED.com's purely right-brain video demonstration "I do not think so". Neuroanatomist Jill Voltte Taylor provides a detailed, sometimes emotional explanation René Descartes, an early modern philosopher who invented analytical geometry, says: In fact, this is not a good technical translation. Descartes means "I am closer, because I am thinking." Certainty: How to implement it and when you know it. In the long history of philosophical discourse, most philosophers try to find out what they believe is convincing, that everyone should agree regardless of their political or other status did. "I think that I like this" The famous introduction of René de Carte is the basis of his dualism theory. Mixture of thinking and body, or materials of expansion and thought, tells the thought of Descartes 'real human'. Descartes' thought that the body is completely independent from the heart is called mechanical view. Descartes's interest in "thinking about yourself" is the first and important step in the transition from metaphysics to epistemology in modern philosophy. He realized the necessity of orderly thought, and he called it a method. The phrase "I think so," or "Cogito ergo sum" may make Descartes the most cited philosopher in the past 400 years. French theory - if I am thinking, I must also exist - is the foundation of modern philosophy. For Descartes, Cogito forms the basis of all other knowledge. In the depth of contemplation, Cogito is the truth decided when Descartes doubts everything. But since Descartes, suspicion has expanded. David Hume and Emanuel Kant asked me what I thought about "me", so I did. Because I have "I", did not you think that happened? Perhaps we should say that it is "thinking" as we said "rain", and say that "I" is right behind this idea.

Dedication gives a friendly connection, or thanks to the author of the other. Dedication has its place on the dedication page and is part of the previous one In a new book, devotion itself is on a dedication page, usually on the front page behind the main main title page. Depending on its importance, it may occupy more than one line. It can also be "a longer version as an introduction to the beginning of devoted letters and books". [1] Today, the function of dedication is mainly part of the author's self-description in front of the reader. Evidence of devotion was offered back to the classical ancient. In addition to expressing gratitude to someone, authors often have other reasons to devote their work to others. In the 18th century, publishers generally did not pay authors; authors tended to be paid or paid as sponsored part of customer relationships. A typical writer is convinced that "I will give my book to an exclusive personality - Flutist, Bishop - or city and earn some money in this way." [2] In many cases, the petitioner was lucky and received the gift from the sponsor. In some cases, the author pledges in front of the sponsor, the official dedication "often contains very subtle and obedient emotions." [2] In some cases, not only the author tried to get some money, but the printer also tried to pay a part of the cost through dedicated things. The dedication of the book can provide an attractive glimpse of the author's life and age. For example, Sir Byron (1788-1824) and Robert Southey gave famous discords, the latter was a poet of the English poet. Byron wrote a silly 17-character poem for his epic "Tang Yu". Economic return [4] As time goes on, the dedication of books is used to issue political statements or to condemn war and inequality. The writer Toni Morrison dedicated the novel Beloved who won the Pulitzer Prize in 1987 to "over 600,000 people" [5]. In addition, the devotion of the book reflects social preferences and customs. Many of the Elizabethan works are neatly witty, but some contemporary writers abandon literary excuses. [6] Dedication should not be confused with a single copy of handwritten dedication: a copy of the presentation ^ a b After mentioning Helmut Shel, Stephan Füssel: WörterbuchdesBuches. Aurofuge. Vittorio Klostermann of Frankfurt am Main in 2002. ISBN 3-465-032209, p. 82 ^ Burns, Patricia (2015). Gentle, 邋 and devotion to an eternal book. ASIN B00VZ2YRM4. ISBN 0989870839 Jost Hochuli: Buchgestaltung of der Schweiz. Aurofuge. Pro Helvetia, Schweizer Kulturstiftung. Zürich 198. ISBN 3 - 908102 - 10 - 3 (German) I will regain Sachlexikon des Buches. Waste heat boiler phone U. Rothenberg. Reclam Verlag, Stuttgart 2003. ISBN 3-15-010542-0 (German) DianaStört: About form and function. Historical buildings are proud of Paratexse. At: "Aus meiner Hand die Buch" ZumPhänomenderWidmung. Waste heat boiler Von · Volca · Cow Collate, Marcel · Azze, Michael · Hansel. Vienna: Turia + Kant 2007 (= Sichtungen.Archiv, Bibliothek, Literaturwissenschaft / 9.Jg, 2005/2006), S. 79-112. ISBN 3-85132-476-5 (German) Bertram + de Leeuw Publishers is an independent publisher specializing in publishing nonfiction and novels. We are interested in a unique original book with commercial viability. Important books, socially important books. This way, we believe that we will provide excellent editing guidance to our writers. This important acquisition, coupled with a solid and positive attitude of the publisher, guarantees quality. The height and appreciation of media, bookstore, and readers' interest. B + L is willing to welcome both writer and new talent. We believe in a joint relationship with our authors and revenues for all books are shared on a 50-50 basis. From printing to e-books, our books are published in a contemporary way and are very cautious. Pub Crawl is a group of enthusiastic writers and publishing experts who write everything about reading, writing and books. Publi

© Hobbes is a British philosopher governed by political philosophy in the 17th century and has great influence even today. Thomas Hobbs was born in Malmesbury, Wiltshire on April 5, 1588, is the son of a pastor. His father left the family in 1604 and never returned, so wealthy uncle at Oxford sponsored Hobbes' education. In 1608, Hobbes became a mentor of William Cavendish and later became Earl of Devon. The Cavendish family was a supporter of Hobbes throughout his life. In 1610, Cavendish and Hobbes visited Europe, visited Germany, France, and Italy. After the death of Cavendish, Hobbes won another position but later became a mentor of Cavendish's son. During these years, he traveled to Europe again to meet the astronomer Galileo Galilei and a leading thinker like the philosopher Rene de Carte. When England was at risk of civil war in 1640, the royalist Hobbes fled to Paris and worried about the long parliamentary response to his writings. He has exiled for 11 years. From 1646 to 1648, Hobbes was the leader of mathematics in Prince Charles of the Wales (future Charles II) and he was an exile as well. In 1651, the most famous work of Hobbes "Leviathan" or "Commonwealth church and folklore material, form and power" was published. For Hobbes, the only way for humans to get rid of the state of natural fear and violence is to abandon freedom, sign a social contract with others, and accept central authorities. Hobbes believes that monarchy provides the best authority. He also believes that sovereignty is absolute so sovereign must also be a state religious leader. Therefore, he is hostile to the Roman Catholic church. This made him unpopular with the French authorities and returned to England in 1651. He continues to write, creates works in mathematics, physics and philosophy, and participates in academic controversy. In 1660, his former student returned to the UK as Charles II and gave Hobbes a pension. In 1666, Congress ordered "Leviathan" to accept the investigation trend of atheists. Hobbes was classified as a heathen and was afraid to burn a lot of his thesis. Charles II mediated on behalf of him, but the condition seems to have not made any further remarks on the political theme Hobbes opened. In 1672, Hobbes published an autobiography of Latin poetry and a translation of "Iliad" and "Odyssey" from 1675 to 1767. He passed away at the family home of Cavendish at the Hardwick Hall of Derbyshire on 4 December 1679. Thomas Hobbs (1588-1679) also wrote an article about rhetoric. By shortening the translation of Aristotle's rhetoric, Hobbes also created many other works on this subject. Hobbes, like Bacon, oppose this trend on many topics, but also suggests a simpler and more natural style that rarely uses rhetoric techniques. Perhaps the most influential development of British style came from the work of the Royal Society (founded in 1660), which established a committee to improve English in 1664. Members of the committee include John Evelyn (1620-1706), Thomas Sprat (1635-1713), and John Dryden (1631-1700). Spratt considers "a wonderful story" to be sick and thinks that the appropriate style "refuse all enlargement, derailment, and style expansion" is "to return to original purity and temporary" It is. 1667) Thomas Hobbs (1588-1679) is a powerful British political philosopher known for his work Leviathan. Among them, Hobbes strongly insists that only a strong government can protect society. He believes that people have signed a social contract with the government to avoid inevitable confusion and inability to live in the "natural state". Hobbes' political philosophy was the foundation of later enlightened thoughters, including Rock, Rousseau, and Kant. Thomas Malthus (1766-1834) is a British economist. He was born in Surrey and is a wealthy family. After receiving education at home, he studied at the University of Cambridge and got a master's degree. His most famous piece is a paper on the main populati

With "Beyond Good and Evil", Nietzsche argues how he believes in democracy. The principle of democracy consists of people who believe in equality or democracy. These principles bring equality, restrict life to the universal truth, and Nietzsche does not agree at all. He believes that these principles make people a large group. In this cow herd, people follow each other and do not have the power, leading to the collapse of individual rights and instincts. In addition to good and evil: "The problem at the beginning is not an open question, the fatal problem of truth value ultimately leads to the affirmation of truth and the complete affirmation of life and humanity - (Nicice's Mission, 24). When Berkowitz claimed that Nietzsche declared the denial of 'willingness to science' because Nietzsche made a "comfortable lie" (Nietzs sche: Ethics of ethicists, 238) (see preface, n.3) Berkowitz misunderstood BGE 24. Nietzsche did not criticize the will of the free spirit within this saying, but rather from a world in which such a situation is evident from a world of certain error-free "real world" or outlook It reminded me that I never escaped to no world. https://the-eye.eu/public/concen.org/UChicagoPress.Ebook.Pack-2016-PHC/9780226259819.UChicago%20Press.Nietzsche%27s%20Enlightenment_%20The% 20Free-Spirit%20Free-Spirit%20Trilogy% 20of% 20the% 20Middle% 20Period.Paul% 20Franco.Oct% 2C2011.pdf With "Beyond Good and Evil", Nietzsche argues that our moral has been defined and redefined many times, so it seems meaningless at first glance. Unlike Plato, Nietzsche accepts no form of power to produce a perfect image. However, we define "good" and "bad". When he said that "God is dead" he said he died as a result of enlightenment as a universal source of human morality. Because form and ideals must be objective, Plato's morality can only be used in a single world view. The need to state morality beyond good and evil is a rejection of Platonic's paradigm. Even now after more than 100 years of tracking down the problem, the Western society is still platonic and it is headed toward micro religion. When we believe that I am better than good and evil, what do we truly believe. We believe that people are the means, not the purpose. According to Aristotle, Kant certainly will end everyone's life. But in order to transcend right and wrong, we must believe that all of what we do to others is their weakness. They are the means we control, enrich and give power. Perhaps you think you know this. What about you? Is not this what happened in the US? People have become a means. Purpose of "economic growth", "national security", and "shareholder value". So are they the end of 'making the United States great'? The end that can be handled - Clean - the way most people think it is appropriate

Human rights groups are seeking release of dozens of people arrested in anti-government protests in Nicaragua on Sunday According to police, 38 people were detained in the capital Managua, 8 of them were released. The police arrested the day before warning that it would not be allowed to continue unauthorized protests. Hundreds of people have died since protest actions demanded President Daniel Ortega to resign When the riot police entered the expulsion of the demonstrators, the protesters gathered at the slogan of "Unity for Freedom". President Ortega announced on September 28 that anti-government demo is illegal. The President also warned that unauthorized protest organizers will face accusations. The "Joint Freedom Alliance" parade was one of the earliest protest demonstrations organized, as the police issued a statement saying they will take all the steps necessary to stop it on Saturday. In a Saturday speech, President Ortega accused protesters "for march for blood, not for peace, they want their blood" they want. On Sunday the police took the stan bomb and the can of tear gas to make the protesters dissolve, and it came into effect In his [Spanish] tweet, Luis Almagro, the head of the National Organization of the United States, called for the Nicaraguan government to release detainees and cease to suppress peaceful protest actions. Nearby Costa Rica President Carlos Alvarad calls for "Immediate termination of Nicaragua's suppression" In a statement, he also asked for respect for the legal rights of Nicaraguans against protests and freedom of expression. The Nicaraguan government has refuted the "interference" of President Alvarado into the internal affairs of Nicaragua in a statement [Spanish] The current wave of protests began for the first time in April when demonstrators requested a planned change of the national social security system. After a fatal clash between security forces and protesters, the protest actions expanded rapidly, protestors demanded President Ortega's resignation. Mr. Ortega holds power since 2007 and his critics condemn him to become more authoritarian and restricted Nicaraguans freedom and civil liberties. The president condemns the democratic participants planning democratically elected governments and coups stimulating violence. Local human rights groups and the UN human rights bureau have documented suspected human rights violations including illegal detention and torture. Police arrested at least five people on Wednesday night at a demonstration outside the Missouri State Ferguson police station. Arrest suppresses the protesters as the grand jury is expected to ruling within the next few days to decide whether to sue Darren Wilson, a police officer who killed unarmed teenager Michael Brown in August It was an escalation by the police to do. Police arrests by riot police were the first arrests in about a week. One of the people arrested was broadcasting a protest on the Internet, and he seemed deliberately targeted by the police. Three of the five arrested are from Missouri, one by Wisconsin, and the other by Illinois. In 2002, in the city of Aksi in the south, the police fired people protesting the arrest of local politicians. Six of the demonstrators were murdered, causing opposition to Akayev. In 2005, his government collapsed with Bishkek's riot and robbery, and he was replaced by former Prime Minister Kurmanbek Bakiyev. Kyrgyzstan has always tried to balance the interests of the West and Russia. After the September 11 incident, Kyrgyzstan agreed to set up a US Air Force base in Manas, a suburb of Bishkek. This facility is scheduled to be closed in July 2014 as a logistical base for military operations in the US and NATO in Afghanistan. Russia has an air force base near Kant. Economically, Kyrgyzstan relies heavily on Russia despite China's progress in the past two decades. High unemployment rates and widespread poverty mean that Kyr

Whether we like or not, war is taken root in today's world. Recent advances in technology and a hysterical increase in safety are taking place, but war seems to be widespread and worse. This raises the question of where the war comes from. As a human being, is it difficult for us to fight each other biologically or be influenced by fellows and morality? What is war based on thefreedictionary.com online dictionary, war is explained as follows. Culturists reject biological determinism and try to explain the causal relationship of war from a specific cultural system. Supporters say that determinism is implicit when advocating that war is simply a product of human culture and society and has different views on the nature and possibilities of cultural change. For example, in peaceful exchanges, people involved in "soft morals" of trade can offset or even abolish cultures that are extreme cultural tendencies (as Kant believes) or cultures affected by inertia can. Can only the overseas nation state be a means of peace? This problem caused problems in ways in which some societies abandoned the extent of war and experience and abandoned the normative nature that other communities could deploy similar programs. For example, what is the cause of the peace between the Sengoku tribes of England and the denial of the same peace to the people of Northern Ireland and the people of Yugoslavia? HIST 0228A. War and Peace in Contemporary Europe This course will explore war, culture and relationships with modern European war, culture and society. The two world wars altered the political, social and cultural landscape of Europe, and in turn changed the world, especially the United States. Instead of digging down the military history of these great conflicts, we will instead examine all war experiences as memories and memories, culture and expression, humanity and civilization, utopia and revolution, understanding of Europe in disaster and identity I will study how to change. I will practice. I read influential scholarly literature and literary works and see important contemporary films. The full war is expressed as "war comes from all political, social, economic and cultural areas of the nation-state." The first main example is World War I. Obviously, this war has changed the society and had a wide range of influence on countries directly involved in the war. But the extent to which it divides society is an interesting controversy. The government wants to promote national integration policy to make maximum use of resources in this consumable war, but there are some examples of how social boundaries are weakened. This happens from the perspective of social class and gender Essay.com / Twenty - Century War has been proved to be an institution of social division rather than national integration The whole war in the 20th century was an institution of social integration and it turned out that it was not an agency of national integration.

Morality is a difficult term to define and decipher because there are many things to consider. If you rank 10 groups and ask moral questions, you may get different answers. People all over the world have various beliefs and are promoted to support these beliefs. Abortion is one of the topics in our country and it is a big moral matter. Some people think that abortion is murder and that it is a moral error. Then there is no other problem with this, there are people who think that it is not murder. The morality of the master-slave is the central theme of Friedrich Nietzsche's work, especially the first article of "moral lineage". Nietzsche believes that there are two basic types of morality: "dominant morality" and "slave morality". Masters of pride and power of moral value, slavery morality appraises goodness, consideration, compassion. Unlike the morality of slavery, morality of ethics measures good or bad outcome behavior (ie classical virtue and vice, resultism) and the morality of a slave weighs the behavior of a good malicious image (Example: Christian's virtue and vice, Kant morality) Master is the creator of morals; slaves use the morals of their slaves to respond to their morals. Unlike Master's morality (emotion), the morality of a slave is based on the revaluation of feelings, that is, the devaluation of master and slave. Since the moral of the Lord began with a strong man, the morality of a slave began with the weak. Since the morality of slavery is a response to oppression, it will destroy oppressors. The morality of slavery is the opposite of the master's morality. Therefore, it is characterized by pessimism and sneer. The emergence of slave morality go against the "good" of the master's moral values. Nietzsche believes that there are two types of morality. Active morality that actively appears from "nobility" and slave morality developing reactively in the weak. These two ethics do not show a simple reversal of each other. Moral ethics incorporates action into the "good" or "bad" outcome, and the morality of slaves incorporates the behavior into the "good" or "bad" intent. To my surprise, he looked down on both, even if the first one was considerably less than the second one. Nietzsche does not necessarily believe that everyone should regard the moral of the master as the action of "everyone, everyone". He believes that moral reassessment will correct subjective and moral contradictions. But he insists that for the individual the moral of the master is better than the morality of the slave. Walter Kaufman opposed the fact that Nietzsche actually liked the moral of master and the morality of slave. He certainly will give more thorough criticism of the morals of slavery, but this is part of the reason he believes that the morality of slavery is a more immediate danger to society.

When I sat in front of the desk and tried to start writing this thesis I hit the wall; I do not know what I wanted to write. This is what I said to myself, but I am not thinking about the reason. Since I have never tried it, I'm just sitting here looking at the blank screen. "Well, I can do this over the weekend, I am free on Sunday, yes, this will be fully resolved," I thought about myself. "It hurts, after all, it's not a big deal, it's only a day." Two weeks ago I remembered that I had a chemical experiment report. Then when I took out the computer, I lost all power. Of course there are. Procrastination is a filthy word - especially among students. High school used to be various kinds such as clicks, athletes, girls, nerds, children of music, but now there are two camps to postpone and tractor. This is a rough over-simplification, but there are some facts somewhere. Because I am full of real-time, I stand on this spectrum, I designed it. Between my parents and my sister, my family is well known and pretty infamous, but I was always a person. . I almost always unscathed and running away. But I will use good grades and funny stories. This was the most common in high school where the stake was low. The university is somewhat different The reason for the delay of high school students is different from that of secondary school. Young people planning to enter the university feel a new burden when going on to high school. Suddenly their homework becomes more important and directly affects their future. Many students believe that they can condemn the lack of concentration rather than the lack of technology if they delay their research. Delay brings many problems to high school students. The obvious result of continuous delays is a decline in grades and a decrease in school success rate. Students who do not postpone important study without finishing their homework will have poor grades. Procrastination can also lead to an increase in stress. High school students are busy with a lot of work. Students who have accumulated their work feel that it is difficult to take responsibility on their shoulders. Delaying work also reduces students' self-esteem High school teenagers want to adapt to the effects of change, delay, study habits, sleeping habits, and becoming high school students, so it is difficult to switch from high school to high school. Teenagers are afraid of failure and are suffering from change. The sense of losing control is usually accompanied by change (Kant). The transition from high school to high school is a big change. High school students will be more free and teachers will no longer allow the students to determine the specific method best suited to their brain's way of synthesizing the presented information. The environment studied also affects productivity and work quality. Attitudes are an important factor fighting the delay. Acquiring an early attitude to maintain a healthy learning habit helps students understand how to deal with many other tasks in different situations.

Aesthetic recognition, dear friend, how are you? The reason for writing this letter is to give you a deeper understanding of what music is. I have learned a lot in the last few months, so I like music very much. I sincerely wish you to consider grabbing music opportunities after reading this letter. Dear friend, this is a decision you'll never regret. Let's share what I have learned with you. To distinguish music is the quality that distinguishes it from other art types. Traditionally, the aesthetics of music or the aesthetics of music has focused on the aesthetics of music and the quality and appreciation of playing (play style and jusanse). Aesthetics is the discipline of philosophy. However, many musicians, music critics, and other non-philosophers have contributed to the aesthetics of music. In recent decades philosophers tended to emphasize problems other than beauty and pleasure. It is widely believed that human reactions to music are influenced by culture. For example, Beethoven 's music section is very inharmonic to those of contemporaries, not harmonic for today' s audience. Therefore, the aesthetic appeal of music seems to depend heavily on the culture of its practice. But there is a physical background that defines whether the sound is correct or not. Appropriate sounds are regarded as soft sounds, and incorrect sounds are considered more or less good sounds depending on the listeners' listening sounds. In ancient times like ancient Greeks, music aesthetics explored mathematical and cosmological dimensions of rhythmic harmony. In the 18th century, the focus shifted to listening to music and changed to music about its beauty and human pleasure (playfulness and joy). The origin of this philosophical change was caused by Baumgarten in the 18th century, followed by Kant. Through their writing, the ancient term "aesthetics" means perception and has its present meaning. In the 2000s philosophers tended to emphasize issues other than beauty and pleasure. For example, the ability of music to express emotions is always a central issue. Music aesthetics tend to emphasize the importance of the composition of composition, but other questions about music aesthetics include lyrics, harmony, hypnotism, emotions, dynamics of time, resonance, games, and colors (See also the development of music). Modern music psychology aims to explain and understand the behavior and experience of music. Research in this field and its subfields is primarily empirical and their knowledge tends to advance the interpretation of data gathered by systematic observation and interaction of human participants. In addition to focusing on the basic cognitive and cognitive processes, music psychology is a practical application in many areas, including studies on performance, composition, education, criticism and healing, and human abilities, skills, and intelligence It is a research field with meaning. , Creativity and social behavior

That man pointed to the text box of Alberto Giacometti. This work is not one of the biggest works of Giacometti, but it is quite large, and it is 69.5 "x 35.5" in size. Unlike many famous figures, Giacometti stretches limbs and body to thin it until it looks like a bean stalk. The man stood straight up and the feet looked almost like a wire. They are disproportionate compared to the fuselage and the fuselage is very fragile. At the same time, the extended arm is very thin and long, so it helps to add a distinct contrast to this monolith. In 1947 the Swiss artist Alberto Giacometti founded L`Homme au doigt (Pointing Man). The sculpture is made of bronze and its height is 180 cm. Giacometti produced a total of 6 sculptures and artists' certificates. Four of these works are on display at museums throughout the world, including the Tate Gallery in London and the Museum of Modern Art in New York. In 2015, one of the actors sold to an unknown purchaser at 112.8 pounds and became the most expensive sculpture on the planet. Giacometti also created the second expensive sculpture in history, L`Homme qui marche I (The Walking Man I). This work was bought by Lily Safra of Brazilian society in 2010 for £ 95.5 million. The top 3 was completed by Ameteo Modigliani by Tête sold in 2010 to an anonymous buyer at 51.6 million pounds. Alberto Giacometti denied that he directly linked "Walking Man I" to "tragedy of war", but he used this work to describe "absurdity and vulnerability of human beings" . A man is suffering from the surroundings and life clearly, but he is still moving forward with a tight skeleton skin. Francis Bacon is welcomed as one of the most painful examples of existential art after the war. "Study for the heart of the screaming papal" shows a sharp movement distorting the face of a screaming person; this is a picture reminiscent of popular emotions ... a human image is a I am screaming inside "If existentialism can be put together in a word, Existentialism also contributed to the postwar figurative arts, especially the discussions of Alberto Giacometti and Francis Bacon's work. This is a sign of the spread of philosophy, and it is widely believed that philosophy is an intellectual expression of anxiety about the human fate of the nuclear power era. The term "existentialism" was made by French philosopher Gabriel Marcel in the 20th century, but its roots are much later than it; people are even Prussian philosopher Immanuel Kant (1724) I can. -1804) found that trace in its mind, he believes that humans are defined by universal quality. In other words, the essence of human being is ubiquitous, its essence depends on external factors such as history and environment, but it overrides the existence of the world. This theme later played an important role in existentialism.

The solar nebula hypothesis is an idea behind the solar nebula hypothesis that the solar system is made up of huge hydrogen, helium, other elements and rocks. For about 5 billion years, this material began to shrink while rotating in a disc shape under their own gravity. The particle begins to combine with the original plane and eventually forms a planet. Many materials eventually formed, began, began to supplement the sun. Recently, there are things that return to Laplace 's nebulae hypothesis, astronomers now accept the sun - nebula disk model (SNDM) or the solar nebula model which is a modern variant of Laplace' s theory. This new model was originally developed by Soviet astronomer Victor Safronov, whose work was "evolution of primitive planetary clouds and formation of the earth and the planet" (Israel's Science Translation Project). It is translated into English. Safronov's hypothesis explains in more detail that George Wetheril discovered that Jupiter's original planet might have its own disk, and the disk formed by the satellite as a whole has a solar system It is similar to. Astronomers now believe that the disk model of the solar system nebula explains not only the formation of the planet in our solar system but also other solar systems. One hypothesis made for the asteroid belt is that in the solar system the formation of the planet is generally thought to occur through a process comparable to the assumption of long-term nebula. And the disk further agglomerates to form the sun and the planet. During the first millions of years of the history of the solar system, the adhesion process of viscous collisions resulted in the accumulation of small particles. And it gradually increased in size. When the mass reaches sufficient mass, they attract other objects and can become stars by gravity. This increase in gravity leads to the formation of planets. By the end of the eighteenth century, French mathematician and astronomer Pierre Simon de la Plus proposed a model of the origin of the solar system. Currently known as the nebula hypothesis. Laplace never is the first person to propose the nebula hypothesis: according to Gregory Baker, "Emmanuel Sweden Fortress - the 18th century cosmologist (Physician, October 1983, 441-446) This article, the Swedish thinker Emmanuel Fort Sweden Introduced a similar theory in 1734 but did not incorporate Newton's method and ideas into his model.In 1754 philosopher Emanuel Kant told his "Natural History of Heaven and Theory" Announced the nebula hypothesis. . However, the Laplace hypothesis is unique in its mathematical rigidity.

Good moral theory requires logical rigor and intuitive appeal to provide effective tools to understand right and wrong. In the field of environmental ethics, there is an important academic research based on the essential value of nature, especially in the development of Paul Taylor. Taylor provided a logically clear argument for protecting the environment by establishing what he calls the concept of biological core (Taylor, 99). This scholarship helps explain what intuitively people understand by the environmentally conscious people, but I noticed that it does not provide a positive answer to what we should live (Cafar). The work of McIntire is only one of the series of contemporary virtues, but it shows many of the strengths and weaknesses of virtue ethics. One of the main advantages of this approach is that it is not a narrow range of choices and actions that are deemed to be in the "moral" field, or considered subjects of mandatory words, but the whole person and the whole life are related to morality Then it is understood. This is more appropriate for our daily prosperity sense - Life is not just right or wrong, it is to integrate all the spheres in our lives that constitute our character (relations with others, Participation in practice and politics, fulfillment of social roles, etc). 6) Ethics provides a central concept of criticism of ethical methods based on moral arguments within the community and between communities, practical and ethical positions, and virtue-based approaches (virtue, practical wisdom and prosperity) Provide resources to enrich. A recent resurgence of virtue ethics in moral philosophy that resonates with existing IR scholars suggests that more attention should come Morality is now widely recognized as an alternative to Kant and the theory of result ethics. However, moral philosophers were late to incorporate ethics into the subject of applied ethics. Furthermore, environmental virtue ethics is an undeveloped field of environmental ethics. Environmental ethics frequently uses moral evaluation (respect, consideration, nature love, etc.) and leads the attraction of role models (Henry Thoreau, Aldreauponto, Rachel Carson etc), but environmental ethics is completely understood Not. Modern virtue ethics research Sandler begins applying virtue ethics to environmental problems, defines "environmental virtues" as virtues corresponding to environmental entities, supports environmental goods or values ​​based on environmental considerations, and / or environmental goods or values. For example, environmental activism virtues will promote environmental goods and value to contribute to "successful access to environmental goods in social and political fields". These qualities include "commitment, familiarization, discipline, focus, insight". , Persistence, creativity, courage, self-discipline, cooperation, patience, unite, perseverance, optimism ... "(p. 49). Virtues of social interactions including miracles react to environmental entities. Wonders provide selfish benefits of excitement, happiness, and satisfaction.

Rational, abstract and structured consideration on philosophy (Greek to Latin, philosophy, "love of wisdom"), the whole reality or basic aspects of human existence and experience. Philosophical exploration is a core element in the history of many civilizations The subject of philosophy is handled in many articles. Discussions on the main system of oriental philosophy are Buddhism, Chinese philosophy, Confucianism, Taoism, Hinduism, Indian philosophy, Jainism, Japanese philosophy, Shintoism, Sikhism For historical reports on Western philosophy, please refer to Western philosophy. Discussions on philosophy on the main religious traditions of the West refer to Christianity: Christian philosophy, Islam: Islamic philosophy, Judaism: Jewish philosophy. Discussions on the West's main schools, exercise, and systems refer to atomism, analysis philosophy, European philosophy, deconstructionism, existentialism, idealism, phenomenology, empiricism, postmodernism, pragmatism, the world view Please give me. Realism; Shihlin; skepticism; stoic school; Utilitarianism Regarding the biography of the main philosopher of the West and the handling of the movement related thereto, Aristotle and Aristotleism, Rene Descartes and Descartesism, Epicurean and Epicureanism, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel and Hegelism, Immanuel · Kant and Kantism, Karl Marx and Marxism, Plato and Platonism, Pythagoras and Pythagoreanism In order to cover a specific field of Western philosophy, referring to aesthetics, epistemology, ethics, thought, logic, metaphysics, biological philosophy, educational philosophy, historical philosophy, philosophy of language, philosophy of logic, philosophy of mathematics, philosophy of philosophy Please give me. Philosophy Philosophy, Religious Philosophy, Philosophy of Science Metaphysics 234 Philosophy of the Mind 191 Philosophy of the Language 172 Epistemology 160 Normative Ethics 139 Philosophy of the 17th and 18th Century 107 Philosophy of Society and Politics 102 General Philosophy of Science 94 Logic and Logic Philosophy 92 Philosophy of Ancient Greece 64 Philosophy of Ancient Greece 64 Philosophy 56 Philosophy of Cognitive Science 56 Religious Philosophy 47 Application Ethics 44 Behavior Philosophy 43 Philosophy of the 20th Century 42 Biological Philosophy 38 Philosophy of the 19th Century 37 Decision Theory 31 Philosophy of the Law 28 Philosophy of the Mainland 25 Philosophy of the Mainland 25 Philosophy of the RMB 25 Social Philosophy 21 Stochastic Philosophy 19 Sex, Race, Sex Philosophy 17 Philosophy of the Middle Ages and the Renaissance 17 Asia's Philosophy 10 Computing and Information Philosophy 2 American Philosophy 2 Africa / Africa's Philosophy 2 The subjects chosen for consideration are: political philosophy, economics and economic philosophy, education and educational philosophy, natural philosophy, social philosophy, and scientific philosophy of the 20th century. These different sub-disciplines are intertwined not only with the application of philosophy, but also basically with the mainstream of philosophical thinking. Why include economics and economic philosophy in education and educational philosophy? In addition to the development of independent natural sciences, the same applies to natural philosophy.

The beginning of the Second World War "The era of anxiety and economic depression is an increasingly powerful era of political dictatorships, the general elections of the basic freedoms of the government and the people fell sharply in Europe" (McKay 967). Most people say that the World War II began was caused by depression all over the world. Others like financialists believe that World War II was not a coincidence. Due to the global recession, the dictatorship was considered a wave of the future and became the beginning of the Second World War. Sembene Ousmane (1923 -) was born in Senegal. He was a self-taught fisherman and was elected to the French army until the end of the Second World War. After the war, Sembene noticed that he will be better in France if he wants to continue his writing career. So he joined the French Communist Party and worked as a harbor worker when he was writing. He is best known for his political / social work. He frequently speaks of African cooperation in slave trade openly, and some of his works are banned in Senegal. The beginning of World War II officially came to the end of the League of Nations, but as an alternative, the United Nations (UN) was founded after World War II. Kant explored the idea of ​​the "Pacific alliance." Like the United Nations League and the United Nations, Doyle's comment "I have a consistent heritage in diplomacy." The war made several countries decide to establish an institution that can achieve this goal. It highlights how human goods, peace and reasonable core idealism are applied to modern world politics. With the idealistic theory of international relations, the establishment of the League of Nations explains the origins of the United Nations, with the aim of making the international political system more peaceful and promoting global political order. World War II took place only twenty years after the end of the First World War. This is one of the most important events in world history. Despite the war that occurred when the Nazi Germany invaded Poland in September 1939, the war began with several important events such as the Versailles Convention, the Federation of Federations, the political and empathic policies and emergence of failures It was. Adolf Hitler's power. At the end of World War I, Germany was forced to agree to the provisions of the Treaty of Versailles. In general, these provisions punish Germany, abandon land to the country, restrict its troops, and force to accept responsibility for the beginning of World War 1. The Treaty of Versailles has produced German and European heritage in the years after World War I. It is currently regarded by many as a severe punishment against Germany after the First World War and is often seen as the cause of the rise of World War II and Adolf Hitler and German fascism.

In this article, we recall that "Psychiatric patients are not mentally ill, he is evil." By dealing with my understanding of psychiatric disorders and their effects and by applying Christian values, the statement that Thomas Hobbes' philosophical thinking "There are no mental disorders for mentally disabled people" is a mental disorder patient I did not really understand the meaning, but I am a good starting point is to first understand what "health" means. Thomas Hobbes vs. Emmanuel Kant Part 1: Thomas Hobbes "Everyone has their own reasons and what can be misused can help him protect his life from his enemies ( Hob) Si, 120) Thomas Hobbes, considered a reasonable egoist, mentioned this in his book "Leviathan". Hobbes believes that people's behavior depends only on the ultimate influence on that person. Our ultimate ethical responsibility comes from our own interests. Thomas Hobbes, Niccolo Machiavelli Thomas Hobbes and Niccolo Machiavelli are the two best philosophers ever. Hobbes was born in England in 1588 when absoluteism dominated Europe. His most famous work is Leviathan written in 1651. Hobbes discusses the ideal state and innate laws like people and nature. Machiavelli was born in Italy in 1469, the homeland was dominated by foreign forces. - Over time, people always want to know what we become reality. Our human nature has always made us interested in the relationship between ourselves and others. Because this curiosity creates various interpretations of our human nature, each interpretation changes the way we see the social world we live in. Each interpretation brings a new understanding of people and their relationship. The most important thing about Thomas Hobbes' Leviathan is that Leviathan of Thomas Hobbes is a research that produces stories and humanity. The story begins with an era of confusion and death through a human development journey eventually leading to a community led by a sustainable and reasonable society - the sovereign state. At first glance, Hobbes' inference about the transition from the natural state to the federal is not airtight. - Hobbes' first three natural laws and objections of fools Thomas Hobbs makes Leviathan the idea that everyone is thinking that everyone is equal despite everyone's thought that everyone is equal started. As Hobbes says, "It is difficult to believe that many people get smarter like them, because they see their own wisdom, but they are far away" (25). Then he discusses psychological self-interests and ultimately explains humans as moved by their own interests for their own interests.

In Confucius' Revelation, paragraph 128, "If your words are magnificent, you will find your actions are difficult to adapt to." [14.21] This paragraph states that the text and speech behavior on page 14 It is in the section of. Confucius is trying here is that it is easy to talk to yourself or your behavior in the same exaggerated way as talking about them in other ways. However, actually performing lofty behavior is far more difficult than performing relatively difficult behavior. For example, in the article of The Analects, Confucius was asked at different times and two disciples that the correct process is to fulfill one's duty. He made a completely different proposal for each person, one to act timely and the other to act slowly. At this point, we can deceive at least one disciple by easily imagining Augustine or Kant, or accusing Confucius of deliberate deception. His argument is not a top priority. Contrary to these choices Confucius continued to explain his differences and said he had combined his advice based on his understanding of the different personality of the two disciples. Conjugate paragraph 128. Confucius said: "If your words are spectacular, you will find it difficult to measure them." This paragraph is in the text and the body of page 14. The action Confucius has tried here is that it is easy to talk to yourself or your behavior in the same exaggerated way as talking about them in other ways. - Confucius is a Chinese philosopher living and being taught in the era when the unified Zhou Kingdom divided into several feudal states. The topics to be discussed are: the philosopher himself, the "The Analects" he represents and its contents, and finally the doctrine and their single interpretation, and further questions to be explained further. Confucius is China's most influential philosopher and his view on talkativeness is very ambiguous. In Confucius of Confucius, Confucius adequately asked: "What is the necessity of eloquence?" (The Analects 5). He reminded his followers that "the ancients were disliking to speak because the ancients think that it is embarrassing if they individually respond to what they said" (Confucius' s Paleontology 22). According to him, exemplary and kind people speak very slowly (The Analects 24 and 12.3). Confucius himself hates eloquent speakers (Confucius paleontology 11.25) and advises not to make people friends (Confucius paleontology 16.4). In his teaching, Confucius compared children (modeler) and bad guys (dwarfs). According to him, the gentleman is moral. Junzi does not talk much, but I will not do it any more. Gentlemen are very thoughtful and cherish their learning. On the other hand, a villain is a smart speaker. He laughs at learning and pays attention to himself with small things.

After all, most people think that the focus of the event plan is to plan the event, and that is it. However, the event plan is more than most people think. People are thinking only weather forecasts and news reports such as hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes, shooting, kidnapping, terrorist attacks, airplane accidents. However, most people do not recognize the crisis. Whether for profit or not-for-profit organizations, organizations get crisis more frequently than anticipated. Yesterday, I joined the # StartupIndia event. This event was called "the biggest and biggest entrepreneurial event at all government agencies in the world". More importantly, # StartupIndia organized under the guidance of the indomitable Amitab Kant saw Prime Minister Narendra Modi start the Initiative Action Plan (SAP) for India. Compared to other start-up action plans drafted by other countries and cities (Canada, Sydney, Amsterdam, etc.), Indian SAP is undoubtedly more ambitious and inclusive. The best protection for large events is to make good plans and prepare them for use. There are multiple phases in the event planning process as described below. Successful event planning requires strong leadership and preparation efforts. Everyone involved needs to be aware that this plan will survive the event at the initial planning stage and help to minimize the damage. You also need to arrange the event planning team and arrange the staff. Large-scale participation and support are necessary for event planning. In addition to emergency management and subject matter experts, risk management and information technology experts should also be included. Because organizations and community people need to understand the plan, include as many cross sections as possible. Because these plans may involve the termination of a specific process, affected people need to participate in the planning process. Expand leadership college. I promised to expand the recommendation of the UT Leadership Academy. As the core of leadership development and successor development plan, Leadership Academy plans to expand to once a year from 2016. Additional funds will be required and approval will be submitted in 2015. Complete supervisor / manager / leader training level 2014 - 2017 The next section will run HR 101 to provide supervisor / administrator / reader the opportunity to learn the basics of personnel. This plan will be implemented in the fall of 2014. The Training Advisory Group is a statewide organization that provides advice and promotes training and will begin planning the training cascade in January 2014. The program implements a new training component every year to complete the anticipated 2017 cascade. WWOORRKKFFOORRCCEE SSTTRRAATTEEGGIICC PPLLAANN and ANWD WWOORRKK CCUULLTTUURREE EENNHHAANNCCEEMMEENNTT

We are born to be free. Freedom varies from culture to culture, culture varies from culture to culture. Some people define freedom as natural rights, and people are born. Everyone wants freedom and is independent from others. Freedom is the right to do what you want to do, eat what he wants, understand what he wants, choose the religion he believes without ignoring or hurting other rights. How can we live freely? From my point of view, we can live by respecting the right to live in the freedom of others. We can not ignore the rights of people living in society. We can not simply ignore others by doing what we want to do. we In life, we often face the high expectations from our parents and the outside world, and we will succumb to the pressure to become a person who is not us. We believe freedom is a natural right, but freedom is a mistake to consume our lives. I like to believe that people have a free lifestyle, but also to the contrary. Your parents planned your life for you when you were born. Your mother wishes you to become the next principal and your father like you will want you to be a doctor. At the same time, you just want to play with your rattles in your crib. You can not even understand your future concept, but your parents are planning to visualize it and guide you in this plan. Is this absolutely correct with freedom? We are born to be free. Freedom varies from culture to culture, culture varies from culture to culture. Some people define freedom as natural rights, and people are born. Everyone wants freedom and is independent from others. Freedom is the right to do what you want to do, eat what he wants, understand what he wants, choose the religion he believes without ignoring or hurting other rights. ... The concept of using natural rights to protect individual freedom, including the freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of press, and the right to assembly freedom, is the core of modern democracy. These freedoms received their classic advertisement in John Stuart Mill's Freedom of Freedom (1859). Kant proposed a unique concept of natural rights. Freedom of will be the ultimate highest invariant value that encompasses all natural rights, natural congenial rights. He coordinates the conflict between all the same free will of all people in society through a world-wide law that instructs absolute orders, that is, all you do. I live without disturbing the equivalent freedom of others. . According to this theory, natural law is not part of eternal law, but natural law provides the ideal of immutable freedom constituting absolute order. Absolute order is imposed by inevitability inherent in the concept of freedom.

Kant believes that the means for obtaining a complete reason is an intrinsic internal conflict of human nature. This conflict, known as male nonsocial social nature, is a concept of opposing men 's tendency to attract each other or eliminate each other. Men are working people because they can not develop their capabilities isolatedly. At the same time, they are also nonsocial as they also hope that everything is done according to their own wishes. Naturally, men need to enter society, but men enter the resistance that may harm society. Marx's philosophy (not Marx - called dialectical materialism) certainly follows Hegel's claim that reality (and history) should be seen dialectically through conflicting opposing forces. This occasionally makes a satire expression: a thesis + opposition → a satire. Hegel believes that the direction of the history of mankind can be characterized by fragmentation into perfect and realistic movements (this is also a move towards increasing rationality). Occasionally, Hegel explained that this absolute progressive expansion involves progressive gradual growth, but sometimes it requires a discontinuous and revolutionary leap - the occasional mess of the current situation. Marx accepted this broad historical view, but Hegel is an idealist and Marx tried to rewrite the dialectic from the viewpoint of materialism. Marx 's view of history is called historical materialism (which is being adapted with controversy as a dialectical materialism philosophy by Engels and Lenin). However, Hegel thinks in an idealistic way, puts the idea at the forefront, and Marx insists that the problem is overriding idea, trying to rewrite the dialectic dialect in materialistic terms. In the view of Hegel's 'spirit' as a place to rule history, Marx regarded it as unnecessary mysticalization and obscured its material behavior in shaping the reality of mankind and the world. He wrote that hegemism needs to place the movement of reality on its head and put it under his feet. He does not like mysterious words, but he used the Gothic language in some of his works. In the "Communist Party Declaration" he declared that "ghosts bothered Europe - ghosts of communism". Today, it seems surprising that Marx and Engels were written the Communist Party Declaration when I was young. Marx is still under 30 years old, Engels is three years old already. However, this excellent document represents the turning point of history. It is as fresh and relevant as it is now when it first saw the light. In fact, the relevance is even bigger today. There is anecdotal that Marx recently acquired a large amount of heritage from his father (possessed by his uncle) and Marx used most of it to buy weapons for Belgian workers taking revolutionary action did. I do not know if this story is correct, but Belgian Ministry of Just believes it certainly. They used this as an excuse for arresting him.

The moral tolerance of works that do not tell a quote the problem that philosophers often raise morality. Why are many of us suffering themselves when judging why morality is so important or which behavior is ethical behavior? Mill explained the driving force behind our ethical issues. He calls this driving force a "conscience" and from this we have reached morality (Mill 496), "Many feelings that must be broken in order to violate our rights standards". Do you lie and ethically allowed? Lying can be regarded as a threat to civil society, but there seem to be some cases where lying seems to be the most intuitive moral choice. In addition, it seems impossible to escape the lies, even if self defamation or the social construction of our personality, is adopted if the definition of widely defined "lie" is adopted. Let's examine these problems in more detail. I would like to confirm this, observing the two countries I spent most of my life. In the United States, lies are deemed to be major moral and legal mistakes, and confidence in the government may be greater than Italy where lies are more permissive. Machiavelli et al contemplated the importance of trusts centuries ago. But he also concluded that in some cases fraud is the best option. How is that possible? why? As mentioned earlier, the lie is wrong and the other conditions are the same. That is why this choice is the cause of evil. But naturally it is natural that other things are inequality, nothing other than common sense everyday moral phenomena, that is, we can not tell the truth, "white lies" allowed with truth It is. Thus, in this case there are no global, logically unrestricted, or context-independent violations of the sort sequence. There is no legitimate reason as just a means, or like a Nazi. Throughout the analysis, this clear, clear, and deep rational belief and classification order in the context of behavior fully expresses human race formulas as the end. Reasonable human condition 4, Kant ethics and human existence: study of moral philosophy - Section 2.4, policy of truth: reexamined murderer, and section 2.5, conclusion Moral objectivism tells the right (and wrong) principle of when to lie. There are three possibilities: i) lies are morally wrong in all cases, ii) morally allowed in all cases, and iii) it is sometimes allowed and sometimes wrong. Moral objectivism is not saying that i) must be correct. People accept moral objectivity, and iii) can be considered correct. Of course, the description in iii) is not very useful. What a person wishes to know is a moral principle when the lie is good and evil. In the following we will focus on the perception of each lie and explain five different moral theories. The theory is as follows.

The philosopher philosopher of the world is often considered hopelessly helpless in the "real world", the theoretical counterpart of the beach on the physical world of less than 90 pounds. There is nothing worse than this. As mentioned above, Alexander the Great learned in Aristotle and then continued to conquer the world (well, the Greeks know the world). It is a coincident. Perhaps, however, the extent to which other ancient characters are influenced by philosophy is far less blurred. As one of the most obvious examples, since Socrates is committed to the social criticism and the lifetime of an open debate, he is judged and executed by the Athenian official who feels threatened by his influence . That thread continues today. Writers and philosophers have different kinds of stories to interpret the world. Poets and novelists use characters to explain the world. Philosophers project frames and structures. Sometimes they will meet with the same person, and we will get a writer, philosopher like Henry James or Albert Camas. Other writers are making novels focusing on philosophical studies. Hemingway is very concerned about the role of observation in human behavior and expressions. Dostoevsky's work focuses on the influence of positivism and materialism philosophy on the human spirit. Like the coronation ceremony, Tolstoy sought a way to impose meaning in a world where his character had no meaning. Most of the European literature of the 19th century was written corresponding to Kant. Albert Camus, a famous French philosopher and existentialist of the 20th century, discussed the struggle between the meaning sought by humans and the lack of a global essential meaning known as "absurd" . The coronation acknowledges the anxiety after the desire for meaningless meaning in the universe, but if it is truly known to be ridiculous, it will be free if confronted. He said, "Returning to consciousness and escape from everyday sleep is the first step of absurd freedom." Here he says he will become more aware of the surroundings if he notices absurdity Opening your eyes and your situation (living in a world without inner meaning), you can create meaning in the face of absurd reality by "rebelling" this situation. The importance of philosophers Philosophers are known for expressing their ideas, which makes life for many people around the world fun. Philosophers are often called philosophers who seek the hidden meaning of hidden but ultimately use a systematic view to develop the agenda. Philosophers recognize the vulnerability of the people they live, still provide their ideas, and share them with the rest of the world.

Corey 's wife, Currie' s wife 's article is the only female character in the male novel; Curly' s wife never gave her name but only about her husband. Like other people in the ranch she is very lonely, dreaming of a beautiful life never realized. Author John Steinbeck symbolically introduces Curley's wife, George and Lennie talk about their dreams, and when Curley's wife saw the two men for the first time they will see this. "The two men looked up at the door as the sun was blocked. When we first heard Curley, he was married his wife for only two weeks. Curley's wife is very young, very beautiful, and very confused - probably why he married her. Curley is not safe because of his manhood and male sensibility, perhaps his low stature, so he licks his wife so that she will not let her talk to others, quarrel with other men and argue this I will try to prove it. He was often proud of his wife, Kant said that Collie put petrolatum in one of his gloves, "Curry said that he keeps his hands to keep his wife tender Fortunately, he has never spent time treating her like her. In her novel she was called "Kelly 's wife". He tried to stop her from spending time with other people in the pasture. Curley's wife has never been named. Through the book, she is still "Kelly's wife". This fact helps transform her personality into things - a person who is away from fear. George repeatedly warned that Lenny was about to leave Colley 's wife. Despite the threat she represents (aspects expressed in her Croix room), Collie's wife is in Crooks' room and belongs to helpless and helpless people. Like group candy, Crooks, Lenny, Curly's wife has little effect on her world. She was under her husband's control and was scared of her hands, so he was isolated as the only woman in the pasture. At that time, Colley 's wife was a group completely left behind in American society. In the novel, the character has never fully developed, but it appears as a silhouette or a symbol of a real person. Candy, Crooks, Curley's wife represents discriminated age, race, gender group. Before they met Candy, Curly 's wife already had a big picture of George and Renee' s eyes. Candy depicts how she tends to put everyone in the "eyes" of a ranch. Nobody really knows Collie's wife because no one is talking to her, and she has heard what she really wants to say.

Course Improvement Project Court 's View Summary 1, Introduction 2. Charles "Chuck" Thomas III and the nature and participants of the United States. The defense of testimony and argument mainly claims that the family problem is a general mistake that violates the response of the sixth revised Blakely and the Washington court. V. Introduction Charles stole is the first time to enter the court . Herbert Fletcher is tired of the basic criminal level of money laundering. Thomas Gates (Jason Earls is playing Joel Gurret in the first movie of the second movie) - Thomas Gates is Charles Carroll Gates' father. Thomas appeared in two movies. Thomas lives in Washington, DC. In 1832, Charles Carroll told Thomas about the treasures of the Knights Templar and handed him the last clue to discover it. Around this time, his brother James insisted that he followed a series of letters from their aunts to their fathers, which brought more treasures than California's gold. Thomas is known for its ability to solve problems. Just five days after the end of the Civil War, he faced another member of the John Wilks booth and KG C. They showed him a password, and he began to decipher it at once. The booth left and we continued our plan to assassinate Lincoln. The man took the gun and urged him to continue deciphering the password. In 1649, a civil war occurred, who decided to rule England: Congress or Charles I. The war ended with a king's dagger. Immediately after Charles was executed, British philosopher Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679) wrote "King Leviathan", the absolute power defense of the king. The title of this book points to a sea monster like a wonderful whale. Hobbes compared Leviathan with the government, which is a powerful country established to impose order. Hobbes started Leviathan by explaining the natural state of equality of nature to all people. Everyone is free to do what they should do. Therefore, everyone is at risk of persistent fear and violent death; human life is loneliness, poverty, hatred, barbarity, and short-lived Thomas Hobbes vs. Emmanuel Kant Part 1: Thomas Hobbes "Everyone has their own reasons and what can be misused can help him protect his life from his enemies ( Hob) Si, 120) Thomas Hobbes, considered a reasonable egoist, mentioned this in his book "Leviathan". Hobbes believes that people's behavior depends only on the ultimate influence on that person. Our ultimate ethical responsibility comes from our own interests.

"When he says that he discovered a new aspect of nonviolent philosophy, he is right, the more you learn, the deeper you learn, the more you learn Predrag Cicovacki's book Gandhi's Footprints are a more serious and profound attempt to reach the depths of Gandhi's vibrant lifestyle and can only ignore the information in this book, Gangier's nonviolence Philosophy It should be protected without being imitated. -Arun Gandhi, "Forgotten female author: Kasituer's secret story", Mahatma Gandhi's wife, and Mahatma Gandhi grandson "People rarely show great admiration for impressing people and can not critically and objectively evaluate the historical importance of this person.PrandragCicovacki realizes this in his research on Gandhi Gandhi's failure, including not only giving a balanced assessment with morality, politics, and respect and not only spirituality but also he can not fully understand with important contemporary people Cicovacki urged readers to transcend the superficial worship of people and reconsider the deep meaning of Gandhi's heritage and its relevance to today's world, which is a wonderful book. " "Considering that his work in Gandhi and the world is mainly a spiritual work, Cicovacki paints Gandhi and the picture of 'civilization' from the point of view of a few people, as we know today It is. His book criticizes Gandhi's lifestyle in this part, which is also a balance between life and work, sympathy and academic interpretation of Gandhi, making an important contribution to understanding Gandhi. It is possible to change the incidence rate of Gandhi. Gandhi. " Predrag Cicovacki is a professor of philosophy at College of the Holy Cross. His research subjects are Kant, violence and nonviolence, and problems of good and evil. He is the principal investigator of Indian Fulbright-Nehru (2012-2013) and is the author or editor of numerous essays and books, including "For the Evil Destiny", Morality of Albert Schweitzer, Kant's Legacy. The legacy of Gandhi is not forgotten, but it is often distorted. He is known as "Mahatma" and has been honored as a saint, but he did not obey and is often misunderstood. Pre-drug Cicovacki tried to dispel Gandhi's myth and carefully studied his ideas, goals and struggles. He looked at the footprint Gandhi left for us and invited us to follow them as carefully and critically as possible. Cicovacki concludes that the importance of supporting the spiritual vision and truth of Gandhi human beings is his long legacy (satyagraha). Mahatma Gandhi is known as Modernas Gandhi, Mahatma Gandhi. What is also known as Mahatma's great soul is "Father of Modern India". He originally came from a town called Western Porvandar in the western part of India. He was born on October 2, 1869. Gandhi is the youngest of three sons of Karamchand Gandhi, Prime Minister of Porbandar, Rajkot and Vankaner. Gandhi's mother is Plum Live, Karamchand Gandhi's fourth wife. - Mohandas Gandhi, also known as Mahatma Gandhi, was born in Gujarat Province, India on 2 October 1869 and received legal education at the University College London. In 1891 Gandhi returned to India, trying to establish practice in Mumbai with little success. Two years later, a company in India who is interested in South Africa asked him to act as a lawyer in the office. After arriving there, Gandhi thought that he himself was a member of the inferior tribe. Also known as Mahatma Gandhi, October 2, 1869 Gandhi (1869 - 1948) was born in Porbandar for legal education in Gujarat State, India, at the University of London. In 1891 Gandhi returned to India after entering a British court lawyer and tried to establish legal practice in Mumbai but it was hardly successful. Two years later, a company in India who is interested in South Africa hired him as a legal consultant at Durban office. - In the West, the word truth means something static and unchanging. I believe the truth is what we once owned and is always effective. But the oriental philo

How to deceive your spouse "Oh, your thighs are so much fun, your thighs are so much fun, she has no place to go, let her blowin, let her blowin and puffin her "I am on my way to the shopping street I grabbed a little celebration atmosphere and started singing Christmas songs while running on the highway. Somewhere, I laughed with a few words changed. I do not want to. My secretary is very cute, yes, she may have been a wonderful partner. But there is a problem: I am married to three children, and a small woman at home is dissatisfied with the marriage sin. For example, if your spouse is cheating you you will never say your spouse may just be "being cheated". It is neither fooled nor illegitimate, this is true. There is no cheating or happening. Of course, I often hear excuses such as "It's complicated". This is actually a statement that is neither positive nor negative, but it is a statement designed to hide the actual behavior. It is a statement intended to be manipulated As it involves breaking loyalty obligations included in the wedding oath, or breaking promises to a spouse at a wedding ceremony, and including despising your spouse, cheating may be said to be wrong. not. The dentist will not consider the outcome of certain misconduct. The cheating itself is wrong. Do not violate the promise or violate your loyalty obligations. Meanwhile, misbehavior is wrong. This should be used for morals. It is not fast. As we have said earlier, as moralists (like Emmanuel Kant) are often considered, there are few moral systems that support the limits of iron cladding. For example, a dentist may perceive cheating as generally wrong, but may be an exception for certain circumstances, such as misconduct when the spouse is negligent or abandoned. (I am not saying that all dentists make these exceptions, there are a few possibilities.) There are several ways to do this. Marriage does not guarantee loyalty. I hope to reduce the possibility that many people get married and the dignity of marriage fooled. However, if your spouse wants to cheat without respecting your relationship, there is no power to prevent unfairness on one sheet of paper. In fact, about half of the marriage, one of the spouses will have a marriage relationship at some point. If you have an unmarried child, you will not have been stigma anymore. In the past, living a child before marriage was terrible for women because of social stigma, but today we are more open. Indeed, according to Pew's report, even in 2008, more than 40% of newborns are unmarried women, and this number has increased in the past few years. In addition, according to the HHS, one-third of children's adoption in the United States is a single parent or unmarried couple.

"Politics is a strong and boring board.I have both passion and foresight.Of course all historical experience supports facts.Target is not only a leader but also a hero very calm It must be a leader in a sense. Even people who are neither leaders nor heroes have to arm themselves with a firm mind, even if all the expectations for courage have collapsed. This is now necessary, otherwise people will not be able to achieve what can be achieved today. " "There is neither a spiritual expert nor an inner perception scholar.This invalid imagination has reached an unprecedented level of civilization" "The world may only have such a small gear someday, a little man clings to a small job and strives for great work - like the Egyptian record, this situation is seen again, The present administrative system, especially its descendents, plays an increasingly important role in the spirit of students This passion for bureaucracy is enough to make people hopeless ... ... It will be a person who intentionally needs "order" There is nothing but ordering As long as this order lasts, it will be nervous and embarrassed. The world should not know anyone else: the most important issue is not how we can promote and accelerate it as it is the evolution that we are already suffering. Please let some people out of this situation - the soul from this supremacy has acquired bureaucratic lifestyle. " Max Weber was born on April 21, 1864. His father, Max Weber Sr, is a politically active lawyer who prefers "world pleasure" and his mother Helene Fallenstein Weber wants a more abusive life. It is a way. The conflict arising in their marriage had a great influence on Max. Nevertheless, their houses are filled with excellent intellectuals and lively words. In the process of growing, he was tired of school and despised the teacher, but he himself swallowed classical literature. Born on 21 April 1864 in Erfurt, Thuringia, Max Weber was the eldest son of Max Weber and Helenfalenstein Weber. Max Weber was suffering from meningitis at the age of 4 and he read as his past time and developed his academic ability as a young man (Secher 1980). Max Weber majored in law in 1882 at the University of Heidelberg. However, as a military officer volunteered to participate in military training, his education was interrupted. In 1884 he retrained in 1890 and graduated (Secher 1980). He was a professor of economics at the University of Freiburg in 1894. After he married Mariannechniker for one year, Marianschnigger was a senior prostitute of Max Weber. Ironically, Weber suffered from long-term psychosis and declined work during the 1897 career peak (Gerth & Mill 1982). Max Weber, Junior Born in 1864 Germany, Erfurt. He is Max Weber, Senior. The biggest of eight children born with Helene Fallenstein Weber. Max Junior is a sick child. At the age of 4, he was suffering from meningitis. Although he finally recovered, due to the rest of his life he suffered from physical and emotional sequelae of illness, most notably anxiety and nervous tension. From a very young age, books are at the heart of Weber's life. He read everything he can get, including Kant, Machiavelli, Spinoza, Goethe and Chopin Howell, who wrote two historical articles before his 14th birthday. However, Weber pays little attention in the lesson, and there are few jobs to go to school. According to his legacy Marian, "His teachers are not civilized, but he does not respect them."

Segu's book is written about the story of Africa like a person who wants to complete autobiography before the end of life. The history of Africa in the 18th and 19th centuries was a very ambiguous topic for me. After reading MaryseCondé's Segu, my personal experience with the Traoré's son clearly shows the idea of ​​this era. What I understand is that this book explains the falling eyes of West African countries and deceiving the personal struggle of the people of Segu Bambara. With the stunning storytelling skills of the African battle, Marys Conde wrote a fast-paced tempo story, rich in the great kingdom between slave trade and the rise of Islam. Segu's history is as brilliant and direct as today. It has recovered some of my many years of disappearance. "" Segu is an overwhelming achievement. It injects the density of historical figures that live like you and me. Passionate, intense, greedy, they collide with themselves and with God and Mammon. MaryseCondé provided a wonderful service by making history a very attractive and exciting one. Segu is a masterpiece of literature I can not put. " "Segu was not made for peace," said MaryseCondé, a striking third novelist character. "Segu likes gunpowder and blood." This book depicts the turbulent history of Segu Kingdom of West Africa and its plight, the plight of Bambara. At the same time, it keeps track of chaotic wealth and internal struggle of key members of the noble Traore family. Kant's masterpiece, born in Guadeloupe, first published in France in 1984 and then published in the United States in 1987, can gain a wider reader after joining penguin's modern classics. When a publisher quickly made a writer smear and gave them one of the most selling books, a writable writer was able to get a refreshing and refreshing work. Segu is a wonderful novel. A wonderful educational reading for its amazing historical scope and accuracy. Marys Conde eloquently described the highly developed complex society and culture Africans were deprived of in slave trade. I often notice myself more studying about the many details I learned while reading this novel. I strongly recommend it The book "Segu" is a novel written by Maryse Conde. This novel was created in 1797 and tells the story of Africans of that era. Interestingly, Kant was able to create a novel that made her character life the most visible evidence of the lives of people living in Mari. Clearly, the issue of religion, norms and tradition is explained as an important aspect of society that affects the people of Old Mali. Thanks to Kant's wonderful story, I was fascinated by Mari's character and history

Philosophy of Georg Hegel and Herbert Spencer Philosophy of Georg Wilhelm Hegel (1770-1801) Metaphysics Georg Wilhelm Hegel is keen to find philosophy, it is not only science but also religion, history, art, politics, etc. It will embody all human experiences, including. Hegel's absolute idealistic metaphysical theory believes that reality is the absolute truth of all logical, spiritual and rational thought encompassing all human experience and knowledge. In the history of philosophy, he thinks that many people are trying to compete with each other to find true universal philosophy. Hegel, George William Friedrich, an influential German philosopher of the 19th century. Hegel was born in 1770 and died in 1831. His main work includes rights philosophy and psycho - phenomenology. Hegel believes that people's ideas are evolving from the society they live in. He also believes that the idea of ​​democracy, human rights and constitutionalism in modern society is the cornerstone of a long historical process. His goal is to systematically explain the process and the ideas it creates. Kierkegaard refers to Hegel in several works and is often interpreted as a criticism of Hegel's philosophy. Pen name Background information on Hegel and Feuerbach (Averneri, pp. 8-27) Marx felt Kant was "opposite" and "should" and he was interested in Hegel's philosophy. Hegel's philosophy provides a way to eliminate this dichotomy. By "to achieve idealism in reality". Marx later discovered that this dichotomy still exists in Hegel's philosophy and is hidden in the internal contradiction of his social and political institutional theory. Feuerbach provided Margel a methodological way of criticizing Hegel, a way of change. Hegel believes that thinking is the subject, and that existence is a predicate. But Feuerbach wants to study this subject in space and time to develop materialist philosophy. His method of change is based on people, subject, and thinking. And according to Georg Friedrich Wilhelm Hegel and religious critic Ludwig Feuerbach, how this concept applies to philosophy, especially consciousness philosophy. In his early work "The Economic and Philosophical Manuscript of 1844", Karl Marx took away the concept of alienation from theological - philosophical tradition and effectively reworked it (Thompson 1979, 24). In Part 3 we outline the developmental reasoning of Karl Marx in the "manuscript" and the religious criticisms from German idealist philosophy (especially Hegel) and Ludwig Foilbach ("Christian essence") . They describe their origin and transformation. In this way, we study all aspects of alienation divided by Marx, describe the circumstances and roles of alienation in "manuscripts", and describe the essence of human beings as "representative species existence" We will explore the features. Learn more

Between the 2nd century BC and the century, the ACE Rome extended from the control of the city state to the Mediterranean Empire, the Roman Empire, it is the center of the civilized world. The era of Rome is over. Many people associate Rome with the United States. Rome rising to the power of the great world, Rome from zero, but they reached the peak, the US, then the same as today's fall. Rome and the United States are similar in many ways. Rome was an advanced civilization dominated by democracy in the past. Historians have been fascinated by the decline of great civilizations like ancient Greece and Rome. But for human beings, no more important lessons, rather than the collapse of the United States which has finished the era of virtue invisible in the dark age, and not including autumn than the whole planet. Ultimately even before the birth of the country was released, it destroys the powers of the United States of philosophy. This proposition can also be understood and the sun will not rise tomorrow, "Make sure that it does not become more contradictory Meaning: His philosophical skepticism of David Hume 1748" Investigate human understanding, "I wrote it rises. So we need to waste to prove that falsehood. 1781 ", so I know that it denies knowledge to make room for the necessary faith," he writes the criticism of pure reason Immanuel Kant "he founded, the founding of the United States 5 Published later years As usual, I am Patrick Wyman. You may still remember my old performance "Collapse of Rome". In Tides I am not only covering the fall of the Roman Empire but also the rise of the topic such as the rise of the modern world, the origin of the state, military revolution, capitalism and religious reform. Please consider the historical trend as a TV program that occurs at the same time in two seasons. The historical trend began with the podcast exploring the collapse of the West Roman Empire, "Roman Fall" but after reshuffling, by coping with the cause of Rome's fall, how to re-enter the social reintegration of the city, It will be bigger and more ambitious. To follow the late Middle Ages and the millennium early in modern Europe. Today, we are also hosting a lot of work together to communicate why history, archeology, sociology, religion, politics, and very delicate and complicated stories, moderator in terms of climate change, Patrick Wyman Patrick Wyman), you can tell us The world of life is how it looks

A brief introduction to the concept of logic as a premise: Whether logic constitutes an ontology. What is the relationship between logic and ontology? In modern philosophy, the general answer to the first question is "no", the second question is "no". This is because the logic to borrow Kant's term is understood to be regular rather than constitutive. The rule's principle means to provide us a way that it belongs in essence to the essence of our thought, not in the way of the world, but in a way, as the composition principle does. In this way, the logical concept of rules expresses logic as a "tool" of reason. As I imagined, philosophical business is essentially a logical analysis followed by logical synthesis. Philosophy is more concerned than certain science with different scientific relationships and possible conflicts among them, especially directing a conflict between physics and psychology, or between psychology and logic can not. Philosophy should be inclusive and bold assumptions about the universe should be made, that is, science can not be confirmed or confused. However, these should always be presented as hypotheses and should not be presented as unchanging certainty like religious doctrine as usual. The integrated architecture is part of the philosophical business, but I think it is not the most important part. In my opinion, the most important part is to criticize and clarify concepts that are considered basic and not critical. My own doctrine forgets the limited accidental nature of human reasons. 40 As Michelle Foucault said, the explanation of Kant's own enlightenment states: "It must be seen as an attitude, a spirit, a philosophical life, the situation we are currently in this life.The criticism is also a historical analysis of the limit imposed on us and the experiment of transcending it Experimental [41] This article explores all aspects of the way we think now: Autonomy is expressed entirely in a personalistic culture: emotional tendency to bind us and connect with strangers I do not recognize the importance of ability; and sense that tends to consider progress as a virtue rather than exploring the best way to shape the power of progress to enhance human satisfaction Until German philosopher Immanuel Kant brings criticism into the domain of theory, it was the first time for us to approach modern critical methodology. In his aesthetic work of aesthetic criticism, he studied the feasibility and logic behind "taste judgment". Based on his aesthetic theory, many sentences concerning writing criticism were born, and criticism continued to name itself. In the 21st century, this age turns aesthetics into business and turns criticism into what we know today. Now is the time to learn how to write reviews.

David Hume's "miracle" in David Hume's paper? It is a miracle. Hume has advocated various arguments about why people should not trust any miracle. Hume does not believe that miracles do not exist, but do not believe it because there is no reasonable background. One of his arguments, by definition, miracle is incredible. And there is no reasonable way to believe in miracles. Another argument is that most miracles are often from undeveloped countries and witnesses often create conflicts of interest and oppose each other's experiences. Miraculous memory David Hume's "fairness about human understanding" is obvious, and he believes that no miracles will occur. Hume is a logical person who believes in knowledge experience. Of course, such people do not witness them, it is difficult to believe in extraordinary ideas. Especially when these events require a lot of faith. In order for the incident to be regarded as a miracle, it must violate the laws of nature. But, that is the same legal chief. David Hume devoted himself to part of his philosophy and tried to ignore his wrong assertion about the soul. In Hume's doubt, the German idealist began with Emmanuel Kant and left various cognitive and metaphysical problems. David Hume is an Scottish empiricist and became a philosopher for his metaphysical skepticism and explanation of his mind. Hume was born in the 18th century David Hume's "miracle" in David Hume's paper? miracle,? Hume has advocated various arguments about why people should not trust any miracle. Hume does not believe that miracles do not exist, but do not believe it because there is no reasonable background. One of his arguments, by definition, miracle is incredible. And there is no reasonable way to believe in miracles. Another argument is that most miracles often come from non-civilized interpretation or define miracles; miracles are violations of natural laws that are unusual for most people. When Hume said: "Nothing is considered a miracle, if it happened in a common process of nature, then he will explain this very clearly. A man that looks healthy will suddenly die It is not a miracle. "Hume, p. 888) Hume said that this death is abnormal, but it seems to happen naturally.

Therefore, this emphasizes that the use of English as a global language contributes to the economic growth of each country, making it difficult to compete with other countries due to their military, political and economic strength (Nunan, 2001). The use of languages ​​on a worldwide basis allows countries to communicate and dialogue with each other as it enhances the country's understanding and efficiency to the country (Hale and Basides, 2013). By translation, people can interact with each other in different languages ​​and language skills. English is spoken all over the world, but the story differs from country to country. There are many differences between British English and American English - native speakers can hear British or American accents with a few words (maybe?). But what about Canadians and Americans? Are these neighbors different? Just a bit. This is some of the most common differences. Words with "a" in the center have different pronunciations on the north side of the borderline. For example, let's look at the word "pasta". In the United States, the first syllable is rhyming "lost". In Canada, it sounds like "past". You can see the difference in the word "drama" like "Mario", "Natasha", "Nana". (Most of them are "borrowed" words from other languages.) English is spoken all over the world. There are some differences between European English and American English. These differences lie in the meaning of dictionaries, pronunciations, and specific words (eg the term "Metro" in American English is called "Metro", Americans go to the movies and British I'm going to see pictures and movies). Born in the hill of Dzukija Ciurlionis is full of lakes and pines, and is a child that loves the beauty of his hometown deeply - its color and sound brings him creative and deep meaning. Ciurlionis is too short-lived - he passed away at the age of 35 - he was very active, he drew over 300 photos American travelers speak English and Shelta is a kind of Kant language. The spoken languages ​​used in the United States are similar to English spoken in Irish, but the languages ​​have been transformed into a kind of English for generations and therefore differ in several respects. They usually make a living as asphalt, spray painting, laying linoleum, or as a mobile worker. In December 2010, the Irish Equality Tribunal determined that a traveler's child participated in a discrimination proceeding lawsuit for admission practice at CB High School CBS in Tipperary County. In July 2011, Clonmel 's high school called for the Equality Tribunal to decide entry criteria to indirectly discriminate children of the traveler community.

The United States is proceeding along the path of ancient Rome. There are many differences, but their similarities indicate a similar fate in the United States. My aim was to study the climate and structure of ancient Rome that brought about rapid success. And a similar system contributed to the rapid rise of the United States. By examining the results of this system, corruption and basic philosophy that brought the emergence of the "central government" of both countries and many countries that ended the Roman Republic era were presented. Historians have been fascinated by the decline of great civilizations like ancient Greece and Rome. But for human beings, no more important lessons, rather than the collapse of the United States which has finished the era of virtue invisible in the dark age, and not including autumn than the whole planet. Ultimately even before the birth of the country was released, it destroys the powers of the United States of philosophy. This proposition can also be understood and the sun will not rise tomorrow, "Make sure that it does not become more contradictory Meaning: His philosophical skepticism of David Hume 1748" Investigate human understanding, "I wrote it rises. So we need to waste to prove that falsehood. 1781 ", so I know that it denies knowledge to make room for the necessary faith," he writes the criticism of pure reason Immanuel Kant "he founded, the founding of the United States 5 Published later years For centuries the Roman Empire faced many challenges both inside and outside. Rome is adjacent to a more powerful country. The day of Rome collapse has room for debate. Historians also discovered various reasons. Some people think that the collapse of Rome is the beginning of the Middle Ages. In 184, the excellent emperor Marcus Orillus died. His son, Comodos, succeeded him who led the Treasury to bankruptcy. This is the beginning of the confusion of Rome. In 192 CE the army of Commodus assassinated him. Thanks to the ideal Emperor, the Imperial Armies also struck each other. Because of these internal wars repeated attacks by neighboring tribes succeeded. Probably Romans can protect themselves if they unite to fight enemies. The birth of many emperors in a few years shows the political instability of Rome and the division of its existence.

Production knowledge is always a fundamental aspect of humanity. As curious people, we will try to discover new facts, create new inventions and define new ideas. Interest in this quest advances us as a society, but the way we use it to achieve these goals may be morally correct or may be argued erroneously. Because everyone has their own view of morally correct understanding, moral judgment is often different, limiting the ability of moral judgment and limiting the generation of knowledge. Modern knowledge theory was introduced with his "critic system" by famous philosopher Emmanuel Kant. Some authors believe that knowledge is part of the philosophy of the term epistemology, but now it has evolved into independent science. Education of knowledge, organization of libraries, and many other very practical implementations. For me, knowledge theory is the most useful subject at school as it provides me the basis for solving any problems, questions and challenges in my daily life. The way we study and think about knowledge is a tool in our hands. According to the knowledge theory guide issued on behalf of the International Baccalauré Organization (IBO), the purpose of the Knowledge Theory Course is to encourage students to "consider the nature of knowledge and ponder all learning processes". They study subjects and connect with them as part of the diploma program. "Knowledge theory courses, creativity, behavior, services (CAS), and extended papers form the three core elements of the IB curriculum and require IB diplomas:" Educate everyone " At the center of the IB Diploma is the Knowledge Theory (ToK) course. It is a central element of IB research and summarizes the main knowledge students learn in various subjects. The ToK course "encourages critically thinking about knowledge itself and attempts to help young people understand the problems they encounter" (ToK Discipline Guide). For each subject, it is important to know what kind of knowledge and how to master it. In this sense, ToK is an adhesive that connects various scholarly elements of the IB Diploma. Finally, the IB ToK course is evaluated in two parts. - 1200-1600 articles written in titles chosen from six lists provided by IB

Anselm's ontological debate and Aosta, Baker, St. Anthony, a philosopher of Canterbury, have probably discussed the existence of God for nearly a thousand years at the moment of enlightenment and fantasy due to starvation. It does not show signs of disappearing soon. This is an argument based on rational grounds to distinguish it from other arguments concerning the existence of God, such as cosmology and objective argument. The latter argument depends on the cause and design of the world respectively. There is also the possibility that new scientific progress (Darwin's theory of evolution etc.) will be weakened. St. Anselm, a church doctor at the Catholic Archbishop of Canterbury, first developed an ontological argument. This philosophical argument may be the most strange and hottest argument in the proof. This discussion attracts the attention of famous philosophers such as Emmanuel Kant (evidence of attacking St. Anselm) and G. W. F Hegel (who defended the evidence of Anselm). Please carefully consider the above evidence. This is an interesting proof as God, the perfect being present, shows that it must exist in every possible situation in order to satisfy his perfect definition. Gods that can exist only in certain circumstances but not in other situations are incomplete. As a philosopher, Anselm is best remembered to try to prove the existence of God. Anselm introduced popular ontology arguments. In this discussion, Anselm declares that God "can be regarded as more than I can think". Anselm believes that the existence of God is the source of all completion. Anselm first mentioned that God is the greatest being we may think. When Anselm said this, it meant that it was impossible to think bigger than God. Anselm also said that if it is the greatest existence, it means that it is impossible for him to imagine someone or anything bigger than God. So it is unrealistic to say that God exists only in your heart, as it is actually larger than in the human heart. He believes that a perfect god must exist in reality. Otherwise God will not be perfect. Anselm believes that existence is perfect Anselm is best known for his ontological argument about the existence of God in modern philosophy circles. As generally understood, Anselm does not aim to indicate that God exists without attracting holy text, and his argument is not based on any experience or observable truth. This discussion involves traces of the meaning of this concept entirely according to the analysis of the concept of God and the laws of logic (eg, principles that do not contradict). However, Anselm is well known among medieval experts. He is a monk, but he is the first person who transcends the pure meditation and experience of monastic theology and pursues serious speculative ambitions. I want to find out why God is behaving like history (as the Bible reveals). The relationship between philosophy and theology, belief and understanding requires a new level of accuracy.

"George Berkeley: Esse Est Percipi?" George Berkeley is a Catholic priest living in the 17th century (price, 206). He wrote some of the most profound works of the era, most of which was characterized by rationalism and British empiricism. Berkeley is a member of an empiricist. Generally, British empathists believe that knowledge comes from senses and 'sensory experiences' (Price, 193). Therefore, they believe that there is no natural knowledge, only knowledge is obtained, or they are posterior (Price, 193). John Rock was a British philosopher of the 17th century and contributed to the foundation of modern political discourse and empiricism. He will influence the revision of George Berkeley and David Hume and the theory of social contract, which will lay the foundation for liberal democracy and classical republicanism. Rock will be an influential figure in the formation of the initial US government and the drafting of the national constitution. His political theory will also affect the ideas of Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Emmanuel Kant, John Rawls, Robert Nozick. Many people think the view of rock is similar to modern liberalism, but like most political philosophers it is difficult to classify him as a single ideology. Idealism is a philosophical system developed by Irish philosopher George Berkeley (1685-1783). To be an idealist means that he believes that something like a problem does not exist outside the mind. According to Berkeley, if I do not feel it with five senses, there will be no pencil that I wrote this article. In addition to human thought and our perception, Berkeley is trying to prove that things exist and exist. In the dialogue between Berkeley and Hilos and Filonos, they point out either gods that all ideas are recognized, or gods who perceive the human mind. In other words, according to Berkeley, God is the ultimate creator of our perception. Because of this belief, he ultimately refused such philosophy like Lucretius. Among them Lucretius tried to deny the existence of God. Therefore, while Berkeley can not understand the outside world through thought, he said "wise things".

From my own point of view, humans are the creations of God. The Bible makes me understand that human beings are created in God's statue, and in the process of creating human beings, he breathes life's breath to humans and makes him active. I think human beings are very unique because they are created like God. Human beings are the best among all creations, as humans can think, create new ones, and have control over all other living creatures on the planet. Humans have the advanced knowledge and skills to do things, so they are the creator of the only life who understands their existence. Let me first explain why Christianity appeared in my book. In the Hebrew Bible philosophy, I defended them by clarifying my position and comparing it with important alternatives that a wise person might accept. Since the subject of this book is how people should read the Hebrew Bible, then one of the main alternatives I have claimed (one not only!) Should be surprised by anyone is. Someone who approaches the Bible after a long-term contact with the New Testament and its interpreters. As I wrote in this book, it became totally incompetent to read after the Hebrew Bible had been associated with the Christian New Testament in most times and places and read according to its teachings. The New Testament idea has returned to the Hebrew Scriptures making it difficult to study the Bible (not just Christians but also Jews). The philosophy I started at the stage of my life is far beyond the philosophy I am reading. Indeed, the degree of the philosophical reading I gave during this time was the result of his private journal, his book Sickness Unto Death, I and Thou of Martin Buber, ambiguous about the mystical tradition of orthodox Christianity It is from a book. Erkegaol's personal prayer and Ralph Waldo Emerson's "self-belief" and rereading of clergy in the Old Testament. Besides that, I meditated about T.S. Elliot's "Love Song of Alfred · Prourok" and the 91st Psalm. That's it. Plato, Kant, Hegel, and Descartes are not. I tried not to prove anything to anyone. I do not need to convince the professor that the existence of God and material reality do not exist. I just want to find reasons for life. "Unless you become a child ..." spiritual life can be defined as the development of personality in the field of faith and grace. My Christian personality is not simply a nutritious person, but I am the center of personal and shining personal thinking and emotion. This new child does not match with the crowd as usual, but I will keep my face, I will have the courage to become myself and I will protect it not to be like anyone else. The magnificent image of Jesus Christ waiting to develop and express

It is stone, tree, spring, cobblestone, wood chips, house and so on. In other words, anything that can affect the results of human life. Religion seems to be outdated and even harmful to individuals and societies (hindering or hindering scientific progress), in fact religion, your religion (your faith) is your inner emotion and reality It is a spiritual difference of the world. When the religion begins, I repeat, when people get their qualitative self in the natural environment through subjective consciousness of objective facts through their own intellectual consciousness, Discussion of Rene Descartes on the existence of God Rene Descartes's debate about the existence of God is related to his rationalistic deduction reasoning. Descartes concluded that the truth about the existence of God exists in His idea about the completeness of God and the essence of God (as a complete existence that must exist to be perfect). - All moral arguments about the existence of God are based on the principle that all of us share common sense of morality. Despite cultural differences, in a broad sense, people all over the world have ambiguous thoughts about right and wrong; a moral argument to the existence of God is that this mutual understanding is evidence of the existence of God I will say that. Immanuel Kant advocated this argument (not a moral argument); a god as a source of objective morality Before attempting to explain and evaluate the moral argument about God's existence, it is beneficial to understand the purpose of God's existential argument. Of course, though the views on this are diverse, most contemporary supporters do not believe that theoretical arguments are "proof". They should provide effective arguments and prerequisites that reasonable people can not deny. Such success criterion obviously sets high criteria for success and supporters of the argument of the writer can hardly meet philosophical discussions of interesting conclusions in areas other than formal logic such criteria Correctly point out. Is the premise of these arguments reasonable, at least for reasonable people, more reasonable than rejection? There is much debate about the existence of God about the existence of God. For a long time everyone wanted to prove the existence of God. Some people think that God exists and is proved by many philosophical or scientific foundations and religious reasons. On the other hand, others do not believe in the existence of God and their foundation is proved from many theoretical and scientific point of view. Many people try to prove the existence of God with reason. After Descartes proves its existence, he will think the truth about the essence of God, evidence of the existence of God, and the nature of material objects. The main task in Descartes' meditation is to design a system that allows him to understand the truth. He wants to lay the foundation of all further philosophy

Usage of citizen's disobedience has always changed. By talking about the stories of Adam and Eve starting with the early Biblical texts, humans have a long history of disobedience. There are many examples of civil disobedience including various forms of civil disobedience such as mass abuse, boycott, strikes, non-cooperation, conscientious objections to military activities. Henry David Thoreau was a pioneer of contemporary civil disobedience when he refused to pay headtax because he believed that money would be used to raise funds for the Mexican war did. Civil disobedience is an illegal act in the public place, it will not lead to loss of life or property damage. The purpose of civil disobedience is political change. John Rawls, Jurgen Habermas, Richard Rorty, Sheldon Wolin distinguish citizens from disobedience, but citizens emphasize not following the "citizen" aspect of "disobedience". This article raises doubt about the aspect of "disobedience" of citizen's disobedience, and states as follows. (1) How often does an individual instigate citizen's disobedience in a democratic country? And (2) When is ethical justification for violations of the law? This article clarifies the Kant society that explains the relationship between morality, authority and moral authoritarianism and analyzes these concepts according to US law. When should you allow citizens for disobedience? Should it be allowed? The definition of civil disobedience is to refuse to follow government efforts to change laws and government policies or legislation. Without the government, our society may be confusing, so civil disobedience is not an effort to dissolve the US government. Sometimes, when there is an unjust law and the government does not take the initiative to restore the law, the citizen must act as a citizen's disobedience to raise awareness. Disobedience of citizens is not a rejection against the whole law but a symbolic or ritual violation against the law. Citizens who think they are disobedient and believe that legitimate change methods are hindered or do not exist feel that there is an obligation to break specific laws by more advanced super laws. This is because the behavior related to civil disobedience is regarded as a crime, but both the actor and the public know that these behaviors may be punished, such actions You can work as a protest. Disobedient citizens hope to encourage most people or governments to present moral examples by presenting penalties and to achieve meaningful political, social or economic changes I will. Under the urgent need of establishing moral examples, leaders of civil disobedience claim that illegal activities are nonviolent.

Human personal experience is the sum of experiences forming instantaneous experience, perception of domestic and foreign affairs, or a unified experience like life. Early beliefs of some ancient Greek philosophers were that the mind was like a recording device and simply held an objective record of sensory experience. Until cognitive psychology experiments definitively prove that it is not true, this is based on the "should be" based on "should be", until the heart is filled by the heart, this is the Western world to the 20th century It is considered. Among other things, this explains why explanations about witness events often change frequently In ancient Rome, personal experience was thought to be part of a sacred or species-wide collective experience. This led to the concept of ethnic memory, the mission of the state, and racial discrimination and patriotism. Rather than strict personal experience, this concept may be easier to generate political movement and military morale. Carl Jung and Joseph Campbell are famous researchers of collective experience in the 20th century. During the enlightenment, these ideas were investigated rigorously. Immanuel Kant pointed out that "experience and its purpose" can only be explained as a result of each other. Experience either makes these goals possible, or makes experience possible. Today, this is dualism, denying the third may allow experience and the reality of that goal. As suggested in several versions of Christian and Gaia philosophy, this may be a more general perception. People often think of personal experiences as a type of text other than academic. However, many scholars, including Donald Murray, believe that personal experience will serve as evidence to support your claim. Personal experience is useful in academic fields, so it is important to learn how to make reflexive personal experiences a story. Writing introspective personal stories includes more than just a series of events; instead, it focuses on the importance of finding a series of events. Memoirs are closely related to personal stories. Both contain written explanations about personal experience. These two are closely related, and Merriam - Westerster defines this memo as "a story made up of personal experience." The main difference is that the story concentrates on one incident, and the memoir is focused on the person who is the author of books. In the story, you describe your important life experience. Then, you share your reactions, emotions, and lessons with experience. Memoirs are usually about myself, but it can also have another person, thing or place as a theme. For example, the president often writes memoirs that document their experiences.

Obedience is a form of social influence, where it succumbs to clear instructions and orders from authorities. When I was young, we have been taught to obey the authority of social groups through influences such as parents, teachers, religious institutions etc. The agency's theory (Milgram 1963) supports the view that it observes the identity of the authority and works as an agent of the authority. These behaviors are responsible or authority that can be said to be reasonable. According to Weber (see R. J. Dwver in 2005 in 1947), authority may come from various grounds and may be deemed necessary for legalization. It focuses on Weber's legal authority theory. If there is an active organization in the organization, the authority of various illegal actions may affect the efficiency of the organization. At the same time, the bureaucratic organization will play a legal role within the organization. Linstead, Fulop, and Lilley (2004) outline how to understand how natural evolution tests the power of these organizations. "The only rationale for justification is that as long as it is proved, that is, as long as it is recognized, and as long as believers and disciples are proving their usefulness in their charm" (Weber, 1978 , I: 244) Weber's bureaucracy theory Weber's bureaucracy theory (1958) is one of the most popular topics in organizational research. He determined the justification of power in an authoritarian way. "Power" refers to the ability to ask people to accept orders, "legitimacy" means that people believe that such power is legal in order to comply with the order. We believe that authority has three types of authority. Authority of charisma. Leaders have excellent personal qualities so they can accept the rules. Traditional "Differences and similarities between Weber and Fayor in management theory and practice" Papers and research papers "Contractualism" refers to both the political theory of the legitimacy of political authority and the moral theory of origin or the legal content of moral ethics. Authoritative political theory argues that the legitimate authority of the government must come from the consent of control and that the form and content of such consent comes from the concept of contract or mutual agreement. Contractual moral theory argues that ethics draws normative force from the concept of contract or mutual agreement. Contractors are skeptical about the possibility of establishing moral or political authority within God's will or perfectionistic human nature. Social contractor theorists from the history of political thought include Hobbes, Locke, Kant, Rousseau. Most of contemporary contractors are moral theory, but contractors of political theory do not necessarily need to be contractors of moral theory.

Rene Descartes's 'Contemplation of Philosophy of Philosophy' is a philosophical work composed of six things created by Descartes. Descartes was one of the first Western philosophers who tried to establish the basis of certainty of knowledge. Meditate concerns about everything that could be regarded as suspicious. Descartes explained that when he was a child he believed many mistakes. Descartes claims to have to end a wrong belief before real knowledge comes out. My paper is about Rene de Carte's second meditation. In the second meditation, the famous motto of Rene Descartes is "Cogito, Ergo Sum" or "I think this is my favorite" and as I am also, I think the concepts and ideas presented by Rene Descartes I analyzed and decided to criticize. Finding his second meditation is the most controversial and interesting thing in his meditation. The second meditation is the most controversial meditation in Descartes meditation. Because his first question method is explicitly introduced. And this is also his idea of ​​getting radical, because it shows that every kind of knowledge must be criticized and that people have to doubt everything, including himself. Rene de Carte (1596 - 1650) Rene de Carte is a French philosopher and mathematician. Descartes made a great contribution to the philosophy of rationalism. Descartes' meditation is epoch-making. Because he doubts the previous belief and is trying to prove their validity through logic. Later empiricists opposed Descartes' method, but his philosophy broke many topics for further discussion. Descartes has been proved to be "the existence of God", but his doubt was an important step in promoting the reasons over faith. Descartes also made an important discovery in geometry, calculus and mathematics analysis. The contemplation of Rene Descartes' first philosophy is considered to be one of the most important works of modern philosophy. John Rock, Immanuel Kant, and numerous other philosophers have reacted most to Descartes. However, there is a serious doubt about the main argument of this paper. - Imagine your culture being thrown aside and new culture taught to you. How do you respond? In this story, the author, Jamaica Kinkade talks about her reaction to her and her experience. The writer grew up where British colonial rule took place. She grew up in a small island in the Caribbean, Antigua. She talked about England in her life, this is the place she has never seen before.

Footnotes of Jewish philosophers on reasons and revelations are erroneous summaries. Reason and revelation are sources of different truth. They are inconsistent or complementary. This article attempts to answer these ancient questions from the perspective of the Jewish pluralism. I think that the two most important representatives of the Jewish main thought school, the rationalist Maimonides, Moses Mendelsohn and Hermann Cohen, and the fundamental view of anti-rationalist Judah Hallevi and Solomon Levi Steinheim I will mention. Philosophy - tradition includes a method of religion or ultimate reality, unrelated to the events of the Bible but unrelated to events, rather than the basis of a revelation-based approach, rather than the Bible, rather than the Bible Yes. World and experience, Augustine, Aquinas, Anselm, Kant, Heart Shawn, Alfred North Whitehead - History, but not cross section. Theology of the Old Testament was discovered in the confession of the Old Testament God's activity in history is the most legitimate form of the Old Testament theological discourse and therefore God, Psalm, and JEDP theology. There is no need to summarize. It only understands the process. Apocalypse The Apocalypse is the only book that is difficult to explain in the New Testament. There are several reasons. First, there is a very different interpretation of the overall timing of the book. Some people think that most people are pure history. Some people think much of the future. Second, the Apocalypse has many hints on the Old Testament. Implication is a phrase and reference in the Old Testament, and no one clearly states that he quoted the Old Testament. So, when John refers to the Old Testament, he is not usually saying that you are doing this. Third, the use of symbolic words in the Apocalypse is more than in other parts of the Bible. Apocalypse is a literary form known as the end of the world Philosophical theory believes that God exists (or must exist) and is independent of the teachings and revelations of a particular religion. Some philosophical experts convinced the existence of God through philosophical controversy others believed that they had religious beliefs that they could not need or be supported by rational arguments. Theological non-cognitiveism considers religious languages, in particular words like "god" (the capital), cognitively meaningless. It is cited as evidence that there is no such thing as "god", hence it is the basis of atheism. There are two main arguments: Kenilsson uses semantic verifiable theory to conclude that religious languages ​​are meaningless as it proves weak atheism because it can not be proved

C. G 's life and work Jung' s reconsideration In my first paper on Carl Gustav Jung, I have been skeptical about his work with a doctor for several reasons I would like to repeat. However, as a result of further study of his work, I noticed that these objections are only related to his early mental case, I am more interested in his own late work and theory, I was impressed. I said when I first thought of Jung, "There were many irritating, almost biased qualities in his work." I have limited many of his later theories and assumptions I noticed that. . Mysterium Coniunctionis first appeared in C.G. Collected Works. Jung was in 1963. In the second edition of this work, as well as cross references to other volumes of the bibliography, many modifications and fixes were made to the existing set of other volumes. Mysterious Coniunctionis is the length of the last book of Jung and will be the final explanation of his long research in alchemy. Jung's experience discovered that some of the important issues of modern people are premises that alchemists call "art" or "process". Jung argued that "the symbolic world of alchemy is not belonging to the past garbage dumping ground, but rather establishes a very real and vivid relationship with the recent discovery of unconscious psychology" ing. Volume consists of 10 sections, bibliographic items, index and original Latin and Greek appendices. I will work on M. Div. The paper entitled "The Impact of Emmanuel Kant on CG Jung's Thought" allowed me to read all of Kunt who Jung read, and quotes from his library book and his work showed this There. Two years from now I will return to school to study philosophy and have motivation to continue studying Kant's work beyond what is familiar to psychiatrists. Carl Jung also applies psychoanalysis theory to art. C. G. Jung is a Swiss psychiatrist, influential thinker, founder of analytic psychology. Jung's psychological approach emphasizes understanding the mind by exploring the world of dreams, art, myths, world religions and philosophy. Much of his life's work has been devoted to the philosophy of Oriental and Western, alchemy, astrology, sociology, and the quest for literature and art. His most important contribution includes his psychological prototype, collective unconsciousness, and his theory of synchrony. Jung believes that the many experiences deemed by chance are not merely due to opportunities but rather the parallel execution of events and situations reflecting the dynamics of such management. He believes collective unconscious and typical images are found in art. His idea was particularly popular among American abstract expressionists in the 1940s and 1950s.

With the eighth hell ring of Canto XXVIII, free words and multiple attempts, you can also fully explain the blood and scars you are seeing. Dante started the opening ceremony of Canto XXVIII with a rhetorical question. Virgil and he arrived at the ninth abyss of hell on the eighth lap. In this bag, discordant and divided Sowers are always hurt by demons with swords. Dante asked the reader a question. By using free words and many conversation attempts, you can grasp the blood and scratches you are looking at perfectly. Dante's Divine Comedy not only includes stories about his incredibly difficult journey from earth to hell and to heaven's peak, but it also includes many theology, politics, and even himself It is a multilevel epic. A story of insight. Life is divided into three domes of life Inferno, Purgatorio, Paradiso, the work is written in the form of Terzarima. In Inferno-in 33, Cantos-Dante made a big trip with nine circles of hell. On the eighth lap (especially the ninth bag), Dante met people who "split the seeder when alive" (Inf. With the eighth hell ring of Canto XXVIII, free words and multiple attempts, you can also fully explain the blood and scars you are seeing. Dante started the opening ceremony of Canto XXVIII with a rhetorical question. Virgil and he arrived at the ninth abyss of hell on the eighth lap. In this bag, discordant and divided Sowers are always hurt by demons with swords. Dante asked the reader a question. By using free words and many conversation attempts, you can grasp the blood and scratches you are looking at perfectly. Dante Alighieri met Odesseus ("Ulisse" in Italian) near the bottom of hell with Kant XXVI of his sacred comedy Inferno episode (1308-1320): with Diodedes he is the eighth I walked on the ring In the fire (the eighth circle situation as a punishment against his plan and conspiracy to win the Trojan horse) (Malicious Crime) Dante talks to Homer and Omesetus about it At famous places. He explored with circus people, explored the sea across the Hercules pillars, then told him how to enter the West Sea and look for adventures waiting for them. Life, but obey virtue and knowledge In "The Divine Comedy" by Dante Alighieri, Dis of City (Italian: Dite Italian pronunciation :) contains Hells 6th - 9th laps. Before the city arrived, in the ninth game, Dante met people who committed a crime for self-destruction - desire, bulimia, sinisterity and prosperity - and a crimson city wall suburb of the afflicted area An angry person or a malicious person who is in. From this moment, we find sinners who act for malice and evil. They did not believe that immortality has been imprisoned in an intense tomb forever. In addition, there are circles against violent people, self (suicide), god (best), art (fighter), and nature (sexual perversion) against others. Beyond the ruins of Dis there are fraud and corruption, and finally there is a traitor

Defining a paper: What is morality? When you need to write a paper about it, I will tell you that morality is probably one of the biggest and most confusing. After careful consideration, I summarized some of the morals and their meanings. Morality is one of those words that you can not hear often and that they are not used too often. The Webster Dictionary fully describes a series of guidelines for managing human behavior. Without such codes, anarchist principles will dominate the dominance. The so-called "moral relativism" is three times. The first is descriptive, which states that some people do not agree with moral and immoral. The second is meta ethics, and there is no universal morality when there is a disagreement, so we say that no one is objectively correct or wrong. Third, at the normative stage, we believe that morals of all forms and forms should be tolerated, since no one is objectively correct or wrong. We may all agree to the first stage - there are many differences in moral fix. The second and third stages are not clear. If there is no objective justification or error, should suicide bombers or rapists be tolerated as their morality is completely different from our morality? What is ethics? For the most part, scholar's conclusions on moral evolution are determined by criteria that believe actions must fulfill. If scholars assert that an action must be genetically selfless in order to be morally feasible, they will almost certainly conclude that moral tendencies can not develop. On the other hand, if they define morality with personal selflessness, they almost certainly will reach more positive conclusions. Therefore, it is important to clarify the meaning of morality. Everyone makes moral judgments about the right and wrong of people, the correctness and error of actions, and the rights and obligations of group members. At the phenotype level, most people agree on which behavior is moral and immoral. But if you ask people to be moral or unethical, they may give different reasons to reveal the big difference between their potential moral values. This is controversial if certain actions (such as aiming for specific benefits) are moral. According to different standards and concepts, the way to judge moral, real moral, and not so much is not so clear. Furthermore, why should we be moral or obscure the reasons and benefits? This article discusses all ethical theories advocated by various philosophers from the past to the present and how they can help finding out what they should be a moral answer Let's see. Emanuel Kant's ethics may answer questions of interest to us. But before he gives answers, some basic ideas must be taken into consideration. Kant studied his moral theory by first distinguishing those gentle items from simple means and itself as good or better. He thinks that goodwill is only informative as its value is unconditional and does not depend on what kind of result it will yield.

Rock goddess, piano Tori Amos. This girl has gained so much experience, but I still live to tell it and still share all the experience of life through her songs. Her life is almost like a song, and imagines all the trials and sufferings. Amos was born in Newton, North Carolina on 22nd August 1963 and was not originally known as Tori. Her name is Myra Ellen. Her name changed in the latter stages of her career. From the beginning, her piano talent was acknowledged. 36: Tori Amos, a trained American pianist at TORI AMOS, accompanied her father at the age of 13 and began singing at the bar. After a short stay with the synthetic pop band Y Kant Tori Read, Amos began his solo career in 1990. So far she sold over 12 million albums and released 14 piano led rock and pop albums - the most successful was the 1996 album. Pele's boy produced her most popular professional widow and ranked among the best in the UK after mixing with the dance producer Armand van Helden. 37: SIOUXSIE SIOUX Susan Janet Ballion (aka Siouxsie Sioux) is best known for post punk band Siouxsie and Banshees lead singer. And it sang Peek-a-Boo with Hong Kong garden. With her broken black hair and thick eyeliner, Sue became a symbol of the Gothic movement of the 1980s, and her song was sampled by Massive Attack and covered with Jeff Barkley and red peppers. If you want to know what you want from Tori Amos for a while, here is a nice introduction and a very attractive performance to remember. In the short world of artists' career, listening to Tori Amos 20 years after her first career as a solo career is a revelation. Tori Amos with more than 14 albums and more than 20 years of career are considered Indie's Grande Dame. But she is not the only one - music hobbies include baroque pops, indoor pop music, alternative music, classical music and electronic music, you guess that Tori Amos has a corner in the Renaissance female market I can do it. Tori Amos' music journey begins at the age of 5 and is fully awarded to Johns Hopkins University Peabody University, bringing an extraordinary musical life. She may also be the youngest college dropout, as she insisted on playing with her own ears and was expelled at the age of 11 to be interested in rock music.

In the 19th century, Karl Heinrich Marx did not exert such direct, thoughtful and powerful influences on humanity. He was born in Trier city of Rheinish Prussia on May 5, 1818. His family was a Jew, but in 1824 he converted to pro-testanism. Marx was educated at the universities of Bonn, Berlin and Jena. At the University of Berlin, Marx was influenced by a radical group called G. W. F. Hegelian philosophy and Jan Hegelian. In 1841, Marx acquired his doctorate. Susan Ascher HUM - 2249 - 06 Z September 29, 2014 Karl Marcusal Heinrich Marx was born in Trier, Germany on May 5, 1818, a lawyer Heinrich Marx and a Dutch woman, Henrière, were born . Pr. Preston Marx. As the biggest child among the five children, Marx accepted Jewish baptism as his parents; he went to Lutheran elementary school. He quickly rejected the religion of Christians and Judaism, became an atheist and a materialist. Marx insisted that "religion is people's opium" (curl), he later studied at Friedrichshain stadium Karl Heinrich Marx is one of nine children born in Heinrich and Henrietta Marx in Prussia Trier. His father was a successful lawyer who respected Kant and Voltaire and was an avid activist in Prussian reform. Both parents are Jews and Jews, but Karl 's father was 35 when he converted to Christianity in 1816. This may be a professional concession to the law that prohibited Jews from entering the upper class in 1815. It was the main belief of Trier that he accepted the Lutheran church rather than a Catholic, "Identify Protestant and Intellectual Freedom". After her father died, I waited until 1825 Karl Heinrich Marx was born on 5 May 1818 in Trier of Line Prussia. He is a lawyer at Heinrich Marx, a lawyer, and Henriette Presburg Marx. His parents were descendants of the Jews but his father chose to become a Protestant and was baptized before August 1817 to continue his work in Prussia. "Karl was baptized at the same church at the age of 6 in 1824." http://search.biography.com/print_record.pl?id=6048. Kid's childhood is a happy and easygoing childhood. His parents have a good relationship to help Karl move in the right direction. His parents have four children, Carl is the oldest child.

Moral differences between animals and people Moral problems are often considered ethical issues arising from the needs of others' interests. But by saying the benefits of others, it seems to exclude the benefits of animals from moral arguments. Many people value animals, but others think that animals are simply a source of food. Our major moral obligations to those who care for animals also include secondary obligations to cherish animals. But does the fact that we can choose to give up on meat for moral reasons point to a significant moral difference between animals and humans? As Kant pointed out, humans are the only moral animals and the only thing that can even accept the concept of "rights". What is the problem with keeping ethical considerations for those who can answer it? Here, the mental retardation person, the crazy person, the infant person, the patient of Alzheimer's disease, A. You can enter the moral status of MC. In modest behavior of contemporary moral philosophy this "marginal case" can not relate to moral decision like a monkey, but we will give them a right. First, the definition of rights between people and animals is different. Animals do not have the same rights as humans because "they do not have morality and animals do not have moral mistakes" and the concept of wrong concepts and rights is quite foreign. (Cohen 2001 p.31) Therefore it is impossible to give the same rights to humans and animals, and animals should not be considered to be in the same position as humans. For example, the human law tells us that everyone has Gives a guarantee that it is harmless. Of course scientists should not be allowed to use animals in their experiments if their use is also suitable for animals, but wild animals feed on the animal kingdom law because they feed on food from other animals You can not. They should not be identified with humans, but animals should not be used for scientific experiments.

Socrates is one of the most influential thinkers in the West, but I will not quit my job, but I can correctly explain my life from the work of Greek students. He is convinced because he lives his life to pursue conviction, true wisdom, the will and divine of God. He did not write anything, but his soul source came from one of his students Plato. Socrates was born in 469 BC. Aristotle is a Greek philosopher and scholar. His work encompasses many subjects including physics, poetry, music, biology, and ethics. Aristotle, along with Plato and Socrates, is one of the most important founder of Western philosophy. His views on the physical sciences deeply formed medieval scholarships, even if they were ultimately replaced by Newtonian physics, the influence also extended to the Renaissance. Emmanuel Kant is a German philosopher and is widely regarded as a central figure in contemporary philosophy. He thinks that the concept and scope of human beings constitute the way of thinking of our world view and its law, this rationality is the source of morality. His ideas continue to have a great impact in modern thought, especially metaphysics, epistemology, ethics, political philosophy, and aesthetics. He is regarded as an important person in the history and development of philosophy. Socrates started one of the most influential conversations in Western philosophy about nature's knowledge. By drawing the geometry on the ground, Socrates first proved that the slave did not understand the required length on one side to double the area of ​​the side square of 2 feet. The slaves initially speculated that the length of the original side had to be doubled (4 feet), and when proving this was too much it had to be 3 feet. This is still too much, the slave is in doubt Socrates (BC 469 - 399 BC) was welcomed as one of the founder of Western philosophy, but little is known about him as a historical figure or philosopher. The best explanation of life and work in one of the most influential philosophers in history was first proposed by his student Plato and Xenophon and by contemporary playwright Aristophanes by subsequent classical writers . Nonetheless, the above authors reveal an important contribution of ancient Greek philosophers to philosophy, epistemology and logic. He is the so-called Socratic method or inventor of Erenkn, which is one of the most commonly used methods not only to answer the basic questions of philosophy but also as a tool for scientific research . Ironically, the most famous word of Socrates is "I only know things I do not know."

Furthermore, freedom of thinking affects the lives of people, society and government. It changed them, made it more open, and acknowledged the sacredness of human dignity. Kant's conclusion is that Enlightenment refers to the ability to use its own reasons without guiding the external force. According to Kant, enlightenment is due to the formation of enlightenment Individual transformation, based on sound judgment, the ability to mark a drive from a collective culture to culture, if not using the guidance of a new culture, single reason. This is important not only for people, but also for those who really have the experience of living in the new environment. It is possible to go to a place with a completely different culture from you. As long as I am interested, I spent two semesters in Japan. This is one of the best experiences of my life and forever changed my view of the world. When you travel to another country, you can treat your home as a foreign country. You may look different from when you live there. People do different things everywhere. Many people around the world have survived and thrived for thousands of years. Tell me that this is not wrong, it is new for you. My name is Allison Sawyer, I am 19 years old. The second year of this gap has arrived. I got up in downtown San Francisco. I spent three months teaching English in Bali, at an incredibly many levels, the second part was confirmed that I decided to take the gap of the year. The reasons are as follows: Economic researchers in Australia and the UK conducted a survey in 2012, high school students who postpone college entrance entered the university, planning to study abroad soon after college students. . The researchers also found that taking a gap year gives a significant positive impact to the student's academic record. They are students who graduated but did graduate with average performance than students who did not participate in the gap

There is no main source of information to understand historical events and people. Because this event contains direct information, do not worry that the data is incorrect as the author witnessed the incident there. But the main problem with the main source of information is that it covers only a part of the story. Therefore, if you have a book about the concentration camps of World War II, everyone involved in that camp will see this. It is not what happened during the actual war. Hume has responded to his work in various ways. When entering the eyes of the public, Hume quickly won a group of admirers and disciples, including Adam Smith and historian Edward Gibbons. Immanuel Kant and Rousseau praised Hume and his work very exaggerated, the former considered the only philosopher who is skeptical of his logical conclusion, the latter declared as follows. In his hometown, the only historian who wrote it fairly ... he measured and calculated human error while keeping its weak point. "But writing the full-length attack logic, reasoning and philosophical principles of James Beatty and Joseph Priestley Hume, Thomas Gray says about Hume's philosophical work," I always David Hume is a harmful writer I thought he was doing here, there are as many countries as you have. " Edward Feather first began attacking sensual problems by attacking Hume's way. As Edward Feather understands, to easily summarize Hume's forks (Osherov thinks this reading is wrong and better than George Dickel). After Feser's reply to Massimoomo Pigliucci, Feser summarized self-opposition objections as follows: Any suggestion that does not include "thought relationship" or "de facto problem" can include "refinement" It is as much as possible. And it was sophisticated. Of course, from the viewpoint of Hume, suspicious propositions include traditional metaphysical propositions. Piglici thought that Hume 's position was "one" when he first met it. However, the problem is that Hume's Fokker is the expectation of the verification principle of the positivist, and there is a similar problem.

"Racial discrimination is a shelter for ignorance, it will divide and try to destroy, it is an enemy of freedom, welcomed and deserves to step down." . In our society, racial discrimination is everywhere, it always existed in our past. Racism is destroying our world, which is becoming tolerant. It affects not only one person but also all participants such as bystanders, victims, racists, and threatens our society. Other, in other words: racial discrimination. Racial discrimination leads to discrimination, oppression and death for countless people. Currently, racial discrimination is often closely related to stereotypes. In today's society, stereotypes often criticize you as "you are a racist." Racial stereotypes tend to draw their associated race in a negative way. However, the meanings of both are completely different, please do not confuse. It is important to understand the assumptions and motives behind racist psychology - stereotypes, and prejudice against racial discrimination and discrimination. Usually, we understand the basic structure of hatred. However, not all race discrimination comes from hatred. It is important to understand the basis of many racial prejudices and discrimination. Here is a general view. As philosopher Emmanuel Kant argues, the roots of bad behavior are deeply rooted in human nature. In some cases there is something that almost guarantees to ignore the moral law of treating others with equality and kindness. Regardless of whether it is pride, reliance on power, or other malignant tendencies, our moral tendency will always tend to decay. People are discriminated against skin color, country of origin, appearance, social position and moral beliefs. Racism is the main form of discrimination. There are many definitions of racial discrimination, but there are also prejudices, violence, discrimination, or suppression. Discrimination of this form is extremely hypocritical because everyone is different and there is no "excellent race". Because the United States is a country of very diverse people, it is often hypocritical to hate others or attack others by their country of origin.

Trademark argument against the existence of Descartes' God (also known as causal assertion) seeks to prove the existence of God through our understanding of God. This argument depends on the definition of the cause and outcome of Descartes and he regards it as a priori. The idea that God is an infinite existence, his reason is essentially staying in our brain, as his seal and trademark is like a potter left in his flowerpot. "God put this idea into my mind in my creation, which may give the impression that workers are impressed with his work." This infinite idea is limited to human beings You must be born for the nature. Things can not appear, what is the idea? Descartes' first argument about the existence of God is called a trademark allegation. This argument points out that we all have our own ideas in our minds ("... there is a truthful and positive thought about God or my idea ... "). As the designer left a mark, God must plant this idea in our hearts. "When I think more about this, my initial thought should not be surprised if my intelligence can not figure out why God is behaving like him, because I know that It is because I do not know what the reason is and how God produces them. Discussion of Rene Descartes on the existence of God Rene Descartes's debate about the existence of God is related to his rationalistic deduction reasoning. Descartes concluded that the truth about the existence of God exists in His idea about the completeness of God and the essence of God (as a complete existence that must exist to be perfect). - All moral arguments about the existence of God are based on the principle that all of us share common sense of morality. Despite cultural differences, in a broad sense, people all over the world have ambiguous thoughts about right and wrong; a moral argument to the existence of God is that this mutual understanding is evidence of the existence of God I will say that. Immanuel Kant advocated this argument (not a moral argument); a god as a source of objective morality

Apply Pierre Bourdieu's preference, class and classification theory to modern subculture and verify the results. French sociologist Pierre Bourdieu is one of the earliest theorists to study iconic consumption problems and with a special overview of consumption as a way of everyday practice related to ideology and capitalism. (Lewis, J, 2008. P220) Born and raised in France Pierre Bourdieu is a sociologist, anthropologist, and a philosopher. French sociologist Pierre Bourdieu studied the preference associated with the socio-economic class and 'educational capital'. His goal is to give Kant a scientific answer to the old question of critical criticism by exploring the basis of the classification system in the structure of the social class. . . Please specify the subject of aesthetic enjoyment. As his work "Differentiate cultural criticism of judgment of taste", it is difficult to spread the evaluation in the classroom from one country (France) to another in particular, the result is complicated. But Bourdieu found a clear relationship between class and hobby in art, music, movies, drama. Apply Pierre Bourdieu's preference, class and classification theory to modern subculture and verify the results. French sociologist Pierre Bourdieu is one of the earliest theorists to study iconic consumption problems and with a special overview of consumption as a way of everyday practice related to ideology and capitalism. (Lewis, J, 2008. - Today thousands of movies, books, games and music albums that need to be evaluated are on the market. Even though assessment is always a publicly available source of information, It is easy to get through the 20 th century through these.Evaluation The Internet allows people to easily access these ratings, which means that each time they evaluate a movie, game or music the specific You will be using the program's website. The roots of the influential social and social relationship model of French sociologist Pierre Bourdieu is in the class of Marxism and the theory of conflict. Bourdieu describes social relationships in the context of what he calls the domain. It is defined as a competitive system of social relations that functions according to his own specific logic or rules. This field is a place of power struggle between the dominant class and men. In this field legitimacy - defining important aspects of dominant class - is given or withdrawn.

"Cogito ergo sum - I think so." Mathematicians, scientific thinkers, and metaphysics Rene Descart used this term in his "first philosophical meditation". This word is particularly pronounced in Western philosophy. But this word is not the only legacy of Descartes. Her legacy includes Cartesian coordinates, development of philosophical books and theories. Even though the difference between the body and the mind can trace back to the Greeks, Descartes' explanation on physical and mental relationships is considered to be the first and most influential. In his book 'The First Philosophy of Meditation', Descartes' purpose is to provide a solid foundation for the knowledge of the outside world through many parts. In the second part of his meditation, Descartes' subtitle is "the nature of human thought, and the way it is better known than the body". Continue seeking the truth and give up uncertain ideas. He mentioned the famous route of Archimedes, it gives the unwavering point that he can move the whole planet. Likewise, the unwavering truth of Descartes, and the truth he built the foundation of knowledge is "Cogito · Ergo · Sam". I think so My paper is about Rene de Carte's second meditation. In the second meditation, the famous motto of Rene Descartes is "Cogito, Ergo Sum" or "I think this is my favorite" and as I am also, I think the concepts and ideas presented by Rene Descartes I analyzed and decided to criticize. Finding his second meditation is the most controversial and interesting thing in his meditation. The second meditation is the most controversial meditation in Descartes meditation. Because his first question method is explicitly introduced. And this is also his idea of ​​getting radical, because it shows that every kind of knowledge must be criticized and that people have to doubt everything, including himself. The contemplation of Rene Descartes' first philosophy is considered to be one of the most important works of modern philosophy. John Rock, Immanuel Kant, and numerous other philosophers have reacted most to Descartes. However, there is a serious doubt about the main argument of this paper. - Imagine your culture being thrown aside and new culture taught to you. How do you respond? In this story, the author, Jamaica Kinkade talks about her reaction to her and her experience. The writer grew up where British colonial rule took place. She grew up in a small island in the Caribbean, Antigua. She talked about England in her life, this is the place she has never seen before.

Everyone has to find their own beliefs and be responsible for them at some point. Our parents tell us about their understanding of the world, religion, and politics, but we can not rely on our parents' faith forever. Judy said that he was against the opinions of his parents when he was very young. Judy felt it difficult to grow up with the family he grew up. She was often bound by strict rules. I was very surprised when I discovered that Judy was the daughter of Father Nazareth. "There is no truth of inexperience, logic is not an absolutely reliable tool to discover the truth, and acceptance in mathematics is slower than real life and science" (italics). Luitzen E. J. Brouwer, "Consciousness, Philosophy and Mathematics", Mathematics Philosophy, p. 78. Note that Brouwer expresses mathematics between "life" and "science" (on the other hand expressing a religious world view) and on the other hand. Elsewhere, he acknowledged his philosophical debt to Kant, "Intuitionism and Formalism", ibid., P. 69 Science is not true. Science is a systematic way to discover the truth. The universe (or reality or nature) is a thing to study and science is study itself. Today, the phrase "the law of nature" is not as common as the phrase "physical law", it is probably not common, and a couple days ago, there was an article with no comment "the universe moves physically". It is affected by physics. Did he really want to say that these phenomena did not exist before the formation of the so - called physical law? can not believe. I believe that gravity has already played a role before the development of the law of gravity, that is, before actually observing this phenomenon around humans. Doctors Norman Geisler and Frank Turek present several important things about the truth everyone should know. The first is "truth has been discovered and not invented, it exists outside of anyone's knowledge." One example is the existence of gravity. There is always gravity, it is, of course, true. It was discovered in Newton or in front of him. In introducing new tolerance, the authors of Webster Dictionary's tolerance describe "to recognize and respect others' beliefs and practices without sharing" and "to endure or tolerate someone" I express it as. "They also said," New tolerance is defined as the concept that all values, beliefs, lifestyles, and truths are not equal, "they also say," The Bible is , Clearly indicates that all the values, beliefs, lifestyle and truth claims are not equal. " "

Pope Alexander's epic "gun of rape" is essentially a sarcastic of traditional epic literature. It is filled with the main character Belinda's behavior, Homer's Achilles, Virgil's Eneid and Greek myth. Unlike Homer's role of Iliad's Achilles, her character's image is portrayed as unrelated to vanity, but he is full of anger and pride as well as Belinda's character. But this is where most of the corresponding attributes end; both scales as magnificent performance are far from similar. Rocking the rape of Alexander's simulated heroic epic "Rape Rock" is a satirical tune and structure, it seems to be an active theme. The Pope often thinks it is trivial to cut women's hair unnecessarily, but the fashion industry is serious about thinking about it. After prudent research, the Pope may pose a problem worth thinking seriously unconsciously. At first glance, the rape case is a comment about human waste and courtship ritual. Poetry also discusses the relationship between men and women, especially the more important ones. Pope Alexander's epic "gun of rape" is essentially a sarcastic of traditional epic literature. It is filled with the main character Belinda's behavior, Homer's Achilles, Virgil's Eneid and Greek myth. Unlike Homer's role of Iliad's Achilles, her character's image is portrayed as unrelated to vanity, but he is full of anger and pride as well as Belinda's character. But this is where most of the corresponding attributes end; both scales as magnificent performance are far from similar. In "Rock of Rape", Pope Alexander used this epic format to satire the British society of the 18th century. Belinda, the protagonist of the imitated epic, depicts women's duality as materialist and pure creatures. This socially determined duality shows a contradictory value. Belinda's duality showed the best performance at the end wash scene in Kant I. In this scene, she plays the magnificent hero ready to fight, but she is only ready for this day. Her fragrance will show off her beauty and religious beliefs as well as cosmetics and religious symbols.

Recognizing that the Western philosophical tradition is not the only starting point for normative analysis, the mixed features of quilt and mesh of such patchwork will become more apparent. Many of the modern bioethics textbooks believe that the most decisive moral struggle is between different Western moral philosophy schools. The students got a summary of potted plants from Aristotle, Mill and Kant. It seems as though the moral reflexes of various communities are not influenced by Hinduism, Judaism, Roman Catholicism, Protestantism, Islam, Buddhism, Confucianism, Shintoism, Taoism. Unfortunately, many of the simplified labels obscure the complexities of various cultural and religious traditions that form moral reflections in various situations. Hidden content of words such as Jewish Christian ethics and Oriental and Western ideas far exceeds what is revealed by their large generalization. There is good reason to distinguish "local" areas such as Thailand, as one of the things born in Pocatello, Idaho, and another experience raised in Barcelona, ​​Cape Town, Kyoto, or Reykjavik. Moral world ", Korea, North Korea, Singapore, Japan, China 8 Many societies are increasingly diversified in their nature and the inevitable consequence of this is that clinicians can not mimic various moralities that are incompatible with the secular spirit that underlies Western biomedical clinical practice in various ways It is being exposed to ideals. In the United States, people may quote Buddhists, Shintoism, Confucianism, Hindus and even the ideals of Muslims to prohibit transplants of religious sacred or taboo organs among believers. The more society has racial and religious diversity, the more likely that doctor will face moral ideals and promises that limit or prevent harm reduction and prevention of unnecessary death. This focuses on life science ethics and is working on accelerating the development of Chinese life science ethics system. It publishes the first ethical provisions for Chinese medical scientists and workers and the Declaration of the Chinese Medical Ethics Society 245 (1988). It also has a medical ethics rule committee 246 which is devoted to exploring and improving medical ethics. Under the cooperation of the Medical Ethics Society, regional medical ethics committees were established in the state and big cities. The norms and regulations drafted and promulgated by the Institute of Medical Ethics include the organizational rules of the Hospital Ethics Committee 247 (which led to the establishment of an ethics committee at many hospitals), and the use of high-tech ethics rules in medical applications, such as 248 .

Punishment - Punishment is punishment by acts of perpetrators. Then more things are "to impose penalties on those who are to be punished" (Couture, 2014, p. 60). Lex Talionis, retaliated in Latin, pointed out that it was associated with the "visible" maxim in the Bible and later received punishment in exchange for the crime committed by the criminal (Sieter, 2014, p. 26). Sanctions include death penalty, imprisonment, intermediate sanctions (mandatory probation), or standard probation, each related to sanctions. Retaliation is caused by Latin and is used to reward expiration dates, rewards or punishments. But when talking about revenge, I will discuss about punishment only. The old penalty code "eye for eyes, teeth for teeth" is an example of revenge. Some people think that big events such as tornadoes and earthquakes are cosmic rewards of human pride. Synonyms include compensation, compensation, and compensation. All criminal penalties have two main objectives. First, because it is just and right, it is punishment for punishment and sin. Retaliation is the opposite, it can be remembered as "eyes for the eyes". The second is to prevent and punish offenders to prevent future crimes. Prevention is positive Retaliation is also the purpose of punishment. Logically, when a murderer is executed, there is no further killing. The American society seems to support retaliation. Eye for the eyes is a long-standing law. In an article before death, the author says, "When someone gets life, the balance of justice will be disturbed, as long as the equilibrium does not recover, society will yield to violent rule: only the life of the murderer You can restore balance and let it go to society. "Murder is an unbearable crime and it is persuasive to show that being punished on the spot. There are many flaws, mainly moral problems in this ideology. For example, if that country punishes a person, does that country have the right to kill? Kant believes in the theory of punishment for retaliation. It is a familiar concept of "looking eyes and seeing eyes". He said that punishment must be responsive to sin and that criminals must be punished so that justice and equality can exist, ie, as a justification for the law. Equality in the field of crime and punishment means applying the same pain as the victim (stairs) to the criminal. This may sound harsh and brutal, but it is necessary to remember the relationship between punishment, maxim and world law. For example, if a criminal is stolen, he will endanger his property. His behavior is based on the motivation that if it gets popular it makes everyone dangerous, including his own property. Therefore, the relationship with retaliation theory is based on the belief that if you steal from others, you also steal from yourself.

Jakob Boehme Jakob Boehme (1575-1624) is a German religious mystic, located in the town of Silesian Goerlitz (Poland, Zgorzelec), on the other side of the eastern part of Germany, on the Polish side of the Oder River. As a professional shoe store he is a self-study influenced by the traditions of Paracelsus, Kabbalah, astrology, alchemy and seal (Peuckert, 1924 101, Merkel 302-310, Hvolbel 6-17). In 1600 he experienced an innovative religious epiphany when the sun reflected into an incandescent dish and put him in a vision of God's ecstatic. Absence absent. When I came back from Europe, after I read it I began to read the German mysterious Jacob Bohm's work, fascinated by two or three pages of him. This simple, uneducated shoe store has a god experience that affects millions of people. I may be wrong but I am increasingly convinced that simple people like Baume have a pure instinct and that it is easy to grasp the master's deep spiritual truth . Educated people, especially those I met in the West, will control their original instincts and replace it with some sort of artificial rationalism. Here is why the master called a simple fisherman as his disciple. In autumn, the two poets traveled to the European Continent together. Coleridge spent most of his time studying the philosophy of Immanuel Kant, Jacob Bohm, G. E. Lessing in Germany. So he acquired German and started translating. When he returned to England in 1800, he settled in Keswick with family and friends. For the next 20 years, Coleridge taught literature and philosophy, wrote articles on religion and political theory, served as a governor secretary for two years in Malta, and tried to overcome the poor health of his health. His opium is addictive and lives in economic donations and subsidies. He was still addicted to opium and moved in 1816 with a doctor James Gilman. In 1817 he published Biographia Literaria which included his best literary criticism. He continues to publish verses and prose, especially the sibilin leaves (1817), aid for reflex (1825), church and state (1830). He died in London on 25th July 1834.

Since the beginning of civilization, schools of various ideas have been controversial. They represent different perspectives on every aspect of life, whether religion or politics. The viewpoints of the realist school and the humanist provide different perspectives in various viewpoints. The foundation of a realistic school is the idea that human nature is incomplete. Humanity is regarded as evil and can not be trusted or dependent. In order to build a successful society, citizens need to be controlled by strong sovereign government. Thomas Hobbes vs. Emmanuel Kant Part 1: Thomas Hobbes "Everyone has their own reasons and what can be misused can help him protect his life from his enemies. Si , 120) Thomas Hobbes, considered a reasonable egoist, mentioned this in his book "Leviathan". Hobbes believes that people's behavior depends only on the ultimate influence on that person. Our ultimate ethical responsibility comes from our own interests. Thomas Hobstomas Hobbes is an important person in contributing to the Constitution. Born on 5th April 1588 in Westport, Wiltshire, England, died on 4 December 1679 in Hadwick, England. Hobbs' uncle has sponsored his education at Oxford University. In 1604, Hobbes' father also appointed Thomas Hobbes, left the family, never returned. There are three brothers and sisters, two brothers and one sister in Hobbes. He wrote three major works; De corpore (finally published in 1655) Thomas Hobstomas Hobbes is a British philosopher from 1588 to 1679. He studied at Oxford University, where he learned the classics. His career is a mentor, but he also went to Europe and met scientists and studied various forms of government. He is interested in why people allow themselves to be dominated and what the government's best form in England is. Thomas Hobbes is the first wonderful person of contemporary moral philosophy. - Thomas Hobbes starts Levitra in Book 1: "Human", he establishes his final discussion, the "natural state" of mankind, or the foundation of a person without sovereign rule Constant War, violence, death and fear Thomas Hobbes once said, "This is an obvious fact, there is no common power to make them all awed when humans live, they are in a state called this war." Hobbies 64). Enlightenment thinker Hobbes believes that human being was born to be evil Unless there is a strong moral leader, everything will be chaotic. William Golding's Lord of the Flies effectively provides many examples of Hobbes' view. - Hobbes; Leviathan Hobbes wrote Leviathan and divided it into four parts. For the sake of brevity, I will discuss only the second book on the Hobbes Federation. Like Rousseau, he insists that social people will get better by joining social contracts, and everyone unintentionally detaches social contracts.

Tori Amos Body: Tori Amos and her archetypes, Tori Amos' lyrics are the most complicated music today. The media has some knowledge of her past rape and abuse history, but she is the main focus of her faithful fans and her critics. They are complicated at many levels, and Tori Amos' lyrics require a great way to split her artistic vision. In some interviews, she acknowledged the insight of many semiotic books and other Jungian psychology influences and their prototype. 36: Tori Amos, a trained American pianist at TORI AMOS, accompanied her father at the age of 13 and began singing at the bar. After a short stay with the synthetic pop band Y Kant Tori Read, Amos began his solo career in 1990. So far she sold over 12 million albums and released 14 piano led rock and pop albums - the most successful was the 1996 album. Pele's boy produced her most popular professional widow and ranked among the best in the UK after mixing with the dance producer Armand van Helden. 37: SIOUXSIE SIOUX Susan Janet Ballion (aka Siouxsie Sioux) is best known for post punk band Siouxsie and Banshees lead singer. And it sang Peek-a-Boo with Hong Kong garden. With her broken black hair and thick eyeliner, Sue became a symbol of the Gothic movement of the 1980s, and her song was sampled by Massive Attack and covered with Jeff Barkley and red peppers. If you want to know what you want from Tori Amos for a while, here is a nice introduction and a very attractive performance to remember. In the short world of artists' career, listening to Tori Amos 20 years after her first career as a solo career is a revelation. Tori Amos with more than 14 albums and more than 20 years of career are considered Indie's Grande Dame. But she is not the only one - music hobbies include baroque pops, indoor pop music, alternative music, classical music and electronic music, you guess that Tori Amos has a corner in the Renaissance female market I can do it. Tori Amos' music journey begins at the age of 5 and is fully awarded to Johns Hopkins University Peabody University, bringing an extraordinary musical life. She may also be the youngest college dropout, as she insisted on playing with her own ears and was expelled at the age of 11 to be interested in rock music. I failed in gender research class once and saw Tori Amos singing "Me and a Gun". I have heard this song tens of times, hundreds of times - it is no exaggeration to say that I am one of the high school Tori girls. The difference this time is that one of my best friends spoke about his rape that happened near the campus of our university immediately after we met. Just like punishing the a cappella chorus at a low level personal event at Tori Amos, it includes strangers and weapons - this rape is inherently rare

Throughout history, we have a couple of problems where we came from, and how we get there. It all results in the problem of the existence of God. In the times of Christianity, Judaism, and Muslim, the existence of God has never been questioned. The problem of the existence of God comes from our new way of thinking after these religions. Science makes us think about how things work in our world and casts doubts on the existence of God. Since Jesus did not do scientific research on the day to prove that God existed, the people of history got the concept of God from where. In this article, I will explain how Descartes uses his existence to prove the existence of God. It is based on "I think that God's thought is in my heart" and "I think so". - First of all, I must say that God believes that he has a universal church, the church of God. To my knowledge, many of the people who claim to be God's saints are not. Discussion of Rene Descartes on the existence of God Rene Descartes's debate about the existence of God is related to his rationalistic deduction reasoning. Descartes concluded that the truth about the existence of God exists in His idea about the completeness of God and the essence of God (as a complete existence that must exist to be perfect). - All moral arguments about the existence of God are based on the principle that all of us share common sense of morality. Despite cultural differences, in a broad sense, people all over the world have ambiguous thoughts about right and wrong; a moral argument to the existence of God is that this mutual understanding is evidence of the existence of God I will say that. Immanuel Kant advocated this argument (not a moral argument); a god as a source of objective morality A geometric argument to derive the nature of an object from that concept or concept suggests to Descart that a person may infer the existence of God from the concept or concept of God. (The argument about the existence of God is called an ontological argument, these arguments were originally proposed by St. Anselm of Canterbury in the 11th century.) Descartes 'description of Descartes' ontological argument listed. How persuasive is Descartes? Is it convincing like a mathematical demonstration? Is it convincing like Cogito?

To be competent in judging the degree of pleasure between two different actions, they must have both experiences. (514) Such a judge can then measure which of the two will provide more happiness, and whatever the group of all or the most competent judges decide, it is the greatest happiness It must produce. (514) Regarding the common problem of lying, Muller handled this issue from both sides. First and foremost, it is okay for him to tell a lie so that you can avoid embarrassment. (516) Secondly, he always insisted that telling the truth is good for trust. (516) He said there are exceptions to this rule. I will explain the moral view of John Stuart Mill. This includes explaining the relationship of "the greatest principle of happiness", the quality of happiness, misfortune, pleasure, liars, and time to his point of view. So let's explain how we agree with the principle of rule utilitarianism. I also consider opposing rules of rule utilitarianism and negative responsibility and give me correspondence to each rule. Mill argues that morality is at its foundation in public works, otherwise it is known as the greatest principle of happiness. (513) The essence of this is that behavior is proportional to how happy they produce, and is directly proportional to how much they bring inversion. (513) He insisted that he defended ... show more content John Stuart Mill believes in the moral theory called Utilitarianism and his theory is based on the principle of giving the greatest happiness to most people and Mueller supports the pursuit of happiness. Kant believes that moral theory is called moralist and believes that only the principle of action is important. Utilitarianism believes that morally correct behavior maximizes happiness and minimizes pain. Utilitarian believes that the outcome of actions demonstrates the moral acceptability of the means by which it is accomplished, and the outcome of the behavior is beyond other considerations. In other words, they believe the final proof is correct. Utilitarian thinks that behavior is morally correct if it brings happiness, but it is wrong if it causes pain.

Gareth Elwyn Jones pointed out in the course explanation that "due to the specific details of the history of Wales, people are forced to imagine the country in a totally different way from other countries." "Language, culture, and emotions to a common legacy" Then the whole course can be seen as a brief survey of the expression of these Welsh national identities. In terms of Sri Lanka, he attempted to "change the superiority of Gwinnet in the local dynasty into a unified leader of Wales" Population with some common identity and cultural heritage Group: Sharing beliefs or beliefs, traditions, values ​​or symbols, literature, folklore or music, internal identity, and / or external identity A common heritage of mankind (also known as the common heritage of mankind, the common heritage of mankind, or the common heritage principle) should trust the areas and elements (cultures and nature) defined by the common heritage of mankind I believe that is the principle of international law. We will protect future generations from exploitation by individual countries and companies. Emmanuel Kant argued in his essay "Towards Permanent Peace" that expansion of hospitality through "use of Earth's rights belonging to mankind" finally brings humanity closer to the constitution of the capital. But the concept of a common heritage of mankind was first mentioned in the preamble of the 1954 Hague Convention on the Protection of Cultural Heritage during Armed Conflict. E - Well, in modern sense, the nation state is created through a kind of dominant action. It is based on the imaginary existence of common cultural heritage, which is clearly poor production. A common cultural heritage was born through the actions of the country. I will cover the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland as an example. The reason we call the UK is the brutal conquest of Wales and the Scots, they refuse to see themselves as a true part of England, not to say Irish yet. The same applies to France. Especially Napoleon, the use of local language, use of place name comes from the name of common culture. Until recently, you can register a child with the Basque name. From the perspective of a national builder, like the Walloons in Belgium and the French speaking people in Canada, the cultural uniqueness is where political opposition crystallizes.

Drug tolerance or physiological tolerance, reduced response to substances by prior exposure Multidrug resistance or antibiotic resistance, the ability of pathogenic microorganisms to resist the killing of antimicrobial agents Central tolerance, the mechanism by which newly generated T cells and B cells do not react to themselves Tolerance team, how to ensure that employees do not exceed their financial transaction authority in the ERP system [citation needed] A tolerant paradox, a forgiving person who is opposed to intolerance and therefore does not tolerate it Unlimited tolerance inevitably leads to the loss of tolerance. As long as we provide unlimited tolerance to those who are intolerant, tolerance will be destroyed and forgiving, unless we are ready to defend a tolerant society from the effects of tolerance. For example, in this statement, I do not always mean that I should oppress words of intolerant philosophy, but as long as I can oppose them through rational arguments and make them subject to public opinion, suppression is certain It is not wisest to. It can not be said that we are ready to meet us at a reasonable discussion level and it is very easy to prove that we are ready to condemn all the arguments first. Teach them to do fraudulent things and to use a fist to answer the debate. Therefore, we should declare the right of intolerance to intolerance under the name of tolerance. The history of tolerance is often designed to follow the origin of rational, universal and explicit tolerance theory. The problem with this approach is that it is still unknown whether this theory existed. Discussions about past and present tolerance are often conflicting and almost always questioned. When Castellio, Spinoza, Baylor, or Kant argues that it constitutes a clear argument of tolerance, a tolerant historian shows the same incompatibility 9292 Ian Hunt, "religious freedom in modern Germany: theological, philosophical and Legal Sophis ", Southern Atlantic Quarterly, 113 (Durham, North Carolina, 2014): 37-62 (40). See all notes Religious tolerance and new tolerance philosophy are based on relative truth and cultural relativism. But supporters of "new tolerance" seems not to be tolerant of Christianity. As a Christian, we are referred to as a higher standard than "tolerance" - we are called to love our neighbors. Briefly, we must love sinners, but we can not accept true sins any more. - We all have sinned and should be judged by God. God the Father has sent his one son to satisfy the judgment for those who believe in him. Jesus, the creator of God and eternal child, dies us for sin, underwent punishment suitable for us, buried, and according to the Bible sent life innocent to be raised from death It was. If you really believe and believe in your heart, accept Jesus alone as your Savior and declare that "Jesus is the Lord".

In the 17th century, prominent European thinkers raised the concept of power as "absolute and single". One purpose of these claims is to show that the power of the government is increasingly concentrated in several European countries. The most important of these thinkers are Thomas Hobbes and Jean Bodin. Bodin 's "Federal Six Books" (1576) is a "community' s absolute and permanent power" and provides a permanent definition of sovereignty as "power, function, time - independent. In other words, sovereignty is held by a single authority and can not be distributed among other smaller authorities. Jean Bodan emphasized the importance of state sovereignty in an effective government, not unlimited power. Thomas Hobbes believes that the power of sovereignty is more absolute and infinite, and only God is responsible. For Bordan and Hobbes, the state has central authority over religious conflicts. The Peace Treaty of Westphalian gives the power to determine secular sovereignty, genetic absoluteist monarch, that subject's religious beliefs. Law and order are in principle, but the state is not absolute In the 17th century, well-known European thinkers raised the concept of power as "absolute and unified". One purpose of these claims is to show that the power of the government continues to concentrate in several European countries. The most important of these thinkers are Thomas Hobbes and Jean Bodin. - On the first page of Leviathan quoted by Ebenstein and Ebenstein, Hobbes deals with the inner part of society, ie, equality and inequality. Because everyone is equal, men have wishes and requests corresponding to them. Equality is a way to achieve your goals. "So, if two people crave for the same thing, but they can not enjoy at the same time, they will be enemies, one more person." Although the concept of social contracts was earlier than in the present age (Gough 1967), its overall development occurred in the 17 th century when Thomas Hobbs and John Locke used this theory for different purposes. Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Immanuel Kant and other philosophers also rely on social contract theory, but the classic expression of political obligation contract theory is still Hobbes Leviathan (1651) and Locke's second government theory (1690) . For Hobbes, social contract theory establishes authority of anyone who can master and master power. If we imagine that we are in nature, he believes there is no government or law to lead us, but we believe there is no law of nature, we believe that everyone is equally independent and independent I recognize it.

"Int int", "traditional", "Kant" made a moral decision, he should have gone Our analysis is based on data published by Transparency International, which has published Corruption Perception Index (CPI) since 1995, and based on the level of corruption identified by expert evaluation and opinion survey annually, I rank it. The consumer price index usually defines corruption as "abusing public power for private benefit". The consumer price index is currently ranked from 100 (very clean) to 0 (very corrupt) in 176 countries. By contrast, Brazil's consumer price index is 36, Mexico is 31. This is better than most other countries. In other words, it turns out that corruption is not a big problem in a small country. This can be explained by the fact that in small countries people know each other and can quickly see mass corruption. What is the difference between GCR and Corruption Perception Index (CPI)? The CPI assigns separate scores to index the surveyed country, but GCR provides a story and experience to reveal these scores. Whereas the Consumer Price Index is trying to measure perception of corruption, GCR is exploring the various types of corruption, the measures being taken, the trends of countries and regions, and the factors that influence these trends . The investigation section of each GCR contains the latest CPI. This section contains other corruption related indexes and data investigations from various organizations. For details of CPI, please visit TI's website. Consumer price index GDP deflator is not the only indicator of price level. Consumer price index (CPI) is quoted most frequently among many other price indices. CPI differs from GDP deflator in two important respects. First, the Consumer Price Index measures only price fluctuations of "basket" of goods consumed by typical households. Next, the CPI uses the base year quantity, not the current year quantity, when calculating the price level index value. The formula of the consumer price index is

I do not agree with Frankl on the driving force of the Kierkegaardian buildings for humans. I do not think that the main driving force of people is to pursue meaning. I also do not admit that his critics proposed alternative "motives" such as power and happiness. I believe that people are not the only one, but have the ability to be moved by many motivating factors. Furthermore, I think these motivations are expressed in a predictable, patterned way. In the three books I read this summer, it is possible to track the evolution of the hero's motive and the state of philosophical consciousness that follows. For the purpose of discussion, now I am working with me to develop the dynamic life I have developed in this chapter, to at least give me the comprehensibility of self-commitment self-commitment or the concept of ability of Kierkegaardian Either / Or I would like to discuss Model 2. The theory based on the biology of the practical institution presented in Chapter 3 and the incompatible synthetic possibilities I proposed in Chapter 4 provide a complete explanation and metaphysical basis for the truth of deep freedom, self-commitment To do. The reality or the ability of Kierkegaardian Either / Or is included in the institution's broader metaphysical framework - the ability to constitute principle credibility Reasonable human condition 3, deep freedom and real people: metaphysical research, Section 5.0 - Introduction, and Section 5.1 - Essential structure of deep freedom My idea is described in detail in chapters 2 to 5 below, together with this metaphysical interpretation of Kierkegaard 's concept and contemporary Kant' s anti - mechanism, free will, and practical institutional concepts. I make what I call a profound will. Otherwise, if I am free, I will be the ultimate source of all my choices and intentional actions. If one of the things I select and do is ultimately caused by a big bang or a partial regional environmental process or the state of the physical world, I become a far-end or near-end decision not free I will. This is also a local incompatibility, it is a combination with a clear image. Again, this is nonlocal compatibility and has been incorporated into scientific images Reasonable human condition 3, deep freedom and reality people: metaphysical studies, Section 1 2. Freedom of depth and authenticity of principle The ability to self-commit the choice of life, or true causality of Kierkegaardian Either / Or, and true psychological freedom, spontaneity and ownership is a necessary and sufficient condition for deep freedom. In other words, being deeply free is a necessary condition for the principle of authenticity, but that is not enough condition. It combines deep freedom and creates deep (non) moral responsibility. (Please explain the reason in this chapter as a prerequisite.) Therefore, natural liberalism is only a three part discussion. (I) freedom in life, (ii) incompatible incompatibility is reality, (iii) freely rational human thought Animal organizers essentially include deep freedom of abilities and credibility of principle together and are profound Non) moral responsibility, and natural liberalism is a reality. (Summary, From 1-5 above) Reasonable human condition 3. Deeply free and reality people: Metaphysical research, Section 1.3 - Center proposition and prediction

The sudden appearance of creative work is full of unexpected insight, and "human condition" is more relevant in many respects than it was when it first appeared in 1958. In her study of the state of modern humanity, Hannah Arendt is thinking about the role of human beings in terms of people's behavior. It has power. At that time, Arendt discovered the problem that the human institution and political freedom are gradually decreasing, but the paradox controlled the results of our actions as human strength increased with technical investigations and humanitarian investigations It will be impossible. This new edition was published with the 40th anniversary of the first publication, including an improved and expanded index and a new introduction by the famous Arendt scholar Margaret Canovan, a sharp analysis of the book. I will study the discussion of the book and its current relevance. As a classic of political and social theory, "human state" is a work proved to be eternal and permanent. Hannah Arendt (1906-1975) is one of America's leading social theorists. Her Kant 's political philosophy and love, and Saint Augustine' s lecture was also published by the University Press of the University of Chicago. Hannah Arendt is one of my favorite political philosophers and has become a clear and powerful thinker on human condition. However, "Eichmann of Jerusalem" and "Revolutionary Period" gave me a big impression, but I am not so enthusiastic about "human condition". Here, Arendt aims for a more comprehensive and ambitious thing than the previous one, but I feel it is more routine and limited. Among this enormous work (though it has over 300 pages, but it feels long), Hannah Arendt analyzes the state of the three people, labor, work, and behavior. Labor is a slave in a natural state, a human must do: his body works hard to gain the necessary nutrients and survival for a day's living. Work is like a craftsman, expressing one's identity through physical labor and diligence. Behavior is a human role in diverse actions - imagination to think, talk, invent, and equal respects to them, to improve themselves in their eyes Behavior is the only activity that occurs directly among men ... It is not the fact that humans live in the world living on the earth in response to diversified human condition. All aspects of human condition are related to politics, but this pluralism is particularly state - not only the second necessary condition in all political life, but also the state of each treaty. Another way to understand the importance of promotion and diversity is to understand that behavior becomes meaningless unless someone else exists and gives meaning. The meaning of action and the identity of an actor can only be established within the context of human diversity. The quality of this communication and information disclosure is clear in that Arendt relates actions in the most focused way.

If all of my works have a theme, that is about credibility and self expression. This is really important for you in a sense. The whole process is to clarify the concept of internal need. Bernard Williams in 2002 was a state of mind before human behavior. One of the provinces is "motivation". We say that we must have motivation to take action. David Hume, Donald Davidson, and Harry Frankfurt all believe that they are motivated and want it. Reason has many functions. It has theoretical functions (such as science) and practical functions. We are interested in practical functions, that is to say practicing in the sense of reasonable decision (with emotion and desire) in terms of human behavior and choice. However, a practical function can be understood as having two parts - a "purposeful" function and an ethical function. Kant does not equate moral reasons with the computational rationality of Utilitarians or egoists, as you should now know. But he also did not condemn the actual reason for this. It is a very important place in human life. However, average and target calculations must be supported by various kinds of reasoning - moral reasoning I agree that morality must be first defined. However, the concept of "the selection itself has no practical meaning unless people try to achieve some ideal outcome" is controversial. Several things should be considered good. For example, for some reason, it will not be the only value. If that actual result is to understand the actual result, it is because we need to assume the value of rationality first. So, which goals are inherently "moral" in particular, and which goals are not? This is another tricky philosophical issue that has caused various academic discussions so far. Despite controversy, most people tend to think that every coherent concept that seems to be "moral" behavior must develop with some sort of final social interaction. Actual subjects deny this unique constructivism, institutional dependence, and rationality only when some of their normative self-concepts have a position (major structure). As an agent, we are forced to keep this position practical. It is to maintain something consistently in front of us. There are few reasons to believe that the essence of our relationship and our reasons are completely transparent. The second argument was introduced to deal with cases of deliberate acts that seemed to involve agents who did not participate in principle management procedures to take account of these identities. It is an act. In response to Raz's rapid, opaque and automated behavior example, I claim that its cause has not been elucidated in either normative or motivational diversity yet.

From the beginning of the John Rawls People's Law the Orientalism of Edward Side (1978) caused a contradiction in colonial studies. Does Sed's theory suggest that global impacts and strategies have been demonstrated by culture and imperialism (1993)? Or Orientalism belongs only to the Middle East, especially the Middle East. Is there only one "other" in the work? Alternatively, there is a resistance pocket in the discourse of the Western Empire. But perhaps the most difficult problem involves a position on imperialism and global issues of colonization. John Rawls is a remarkable example of this tradition. In the People's Law, Rawls extended his "justice" approach to global justice. His allegations justified us by showing that people representatives choose to pick it up as an imaginary place to prevent them from knowing which particular person they represent It is possible to do. This ignorant decision model is fair because it eliminates selfish prejudice. When Rawls applied this method in the context of domestic justice, the initial position of the party represented individual members of society, he considered supporting the redistributive, equitivistic liberal politics. In contrast, Rawls believes that when his approach applies to global justice, it fairly supports the traditional Kant 's international ethics: compliance with the duty of the Convention and strict restrictions on war. Take back. Rawls expressed this ideal as "realistic utopia." John Rawls introduced the concept of human rights politics in his book "People's Law" (Rolls 1999). The basic idea is to determine what the human rights are and what they need by determining the main role that human rights fulfills in a particular political field. In the People's Law, this field is international relations (followed by the politics of the country). An attempt by Rawls to rectify international law and politics in today's international system will help Rawls explain how to focus on how human rights works in this system. Human rights in interpersonal relationship does not belong to this field

European and American literary arts of the 18th century grew at an unprecedented speed. During this period, the UK also enjoyed long-term domestic peace, in contrast to the continuation of the 17th century bloody bloody and long-term civil war and international confrontation. In addition, the growing middle class is increasingly seeking education and recreation, the art production market is expanding. One of the most important elements of the 18th century is the increase in prints for readers and writers. The 18 th century was called era of enlightenment or era of reason. Historians do not necessarily truncate the historical period strictly according to the date, the part known as the 18th century reason era usually refers to the period from 1715 to 1789. 1715 is the last year of Queen Anne's reign, the end of the Spanish throne inheritance war. 1789 was the beginning of the French Revolution. In addition to the date, the age of reason is an extraordinary era of intellectual infertility. The scientific revolution that began about a century ago changed people's perception of the problem not only in the field of science but also in the general field of public relations. The principle behind the era of reason is that by using human intelligence it is possible to make a reasonable decision about how people and the country do business. The enlightenment of French literature in the era of intelligent era and rationalism is the period after the classical era of France in the 1700s. During this time, philosophers will focus on rationality as the best way to learn. It explores education, law philosophy and political issues. It attacks tyranny, social injustice, superstition, and ignorance. In this time, progress has been made in the fields of anatomy, astronomy, chemistry, mathematics and physics. - French Neoclassicalism In the 17th century, the age of Louis XIV, Sun King witnessed the emergence of neoclassical ideals, the three largest masters of France, Corneille, Racine, Moliere. With the decline of the religious play in the middle of the 16th century, French play slowly developed. The French Renaissance began in 1630 and ended in 1700 Many critical thinkers believed that religion and reason are hostile in the age of enlightenment in the 17th and 18th centuries. For them, the Middle Ages or the "era of faith" is therefore the opposite of the era of reason. Kant and Voltaire were attacking the Middle Ages as an era of religious decline, and gibbons in the "history of decline and decline of the Roman Empire" expressed contempt for 'dark aged garbage'. But like Petrarch, he saw himself at the cutting edge of the "new era" and criticized it for centuries before his own time, as was the enlightenment writer .

How to write bacon in 'Friendship' Francis Bacon is considered an excellent British essayist, lawyer, philosopher, and politician using scientific philosophy. Francis Bacon is one of the great figures in the British prose world. He is writing concise, easy to understand, practical prose, prose structure is reasonable, persuasive, logical and descriptive. Bacon prose is full of practical wisdom and his work is not only attractive to readers but also easy to learn. Francis Bacon (1561 - 1626) is not a rhetoric but is contributing to this field in his writings. One of the concerns of this era is finding a style that is suitable for discussing scientific themes First of all, it is necessary to state the facts and arguments clearly, not the luxurious style that was then preferred. In his "Advancement of Learning", Bacon does not focus on people who are focusing on style rather than "material weight, subject value, discussion soundness, depth of life, or inventive judgment" Criticized. Regarding style, you should propose styles to suit themes and audiences using simple words as possible and style should be fun. Maxim style means a compact and summarized poetic lighting style. A maxim is a short sentence that expresses the truth with as few words as possible. A saying is like a prover with quotable quality. Bacon is good at writing this kind. Certainly, his prose is full of adage. To illustrate this writing, I can give you any number of examples from his thesis. Bacon demonstrates cohesion. Every sentence in his article is meaningful and can be extended to several sentences. Many of his sentences seem to be well-known proverbs and hobbies as they are briefly expressed. He can speak to him sparingly. His paper combines intellectual wisdom with extreme simplicity. A short and sharp statement of his article has become a popular motto and family representation. Francis Bacon prose's prose proposal "Dry Light" also gave us a good essay "On Beauty" shining with special power in his essay "Friendship". Here, he did not explore the essence of friendship, he did not explore its moral aspects (as did essaysist with some philosophers like Montagne, Kant, and Emerson) Instead of looking at its use. Until it becomes "real". Brought to humans. People who do not have friends "eat their heart." And according to the writer, run the risk of insanity.

The existence of God Our so-called religious experience may be very different. Several reports on supernatural phenomena are difficult to explain from a rational and scientific point of view. On the other hand, there are various testimonies that seem to convey emotions and some kind of peace - this is something most of us may relate to religious or not. First, I consider the essence of experience. Experience includes experience (by sensory test). Discussion of Rene Descartes on the existence of God Rene Descartes's debate about the existence of God is related to his rationalistic deduction reasoning. Descartes concluded that the truth about the existence of God exists in His idea about the completeness of God and the essence of God (as a complete existence that must exist to be perfect). - All moral arguments about the existence of God are based on the principle that all of us share common sense of morality. Despite cultural differences, in a broad sense, people all over the world have ambiguous thoughts about right and wrong; a moral argument to the existence of God is that this mutual understanding is evidence of the existence of God I will say that. Immanuel Kant advocated this argument (not a moral argument); a god as a source of objective morality Before attempting to explain and evaluate the moral argument about God's existence, it is beneficial to understand the purpose of God's existential argument. Of course, though the views on this are diverse, most contemporary supporters do not believe that theoretical arguments are "proof". They should provide effective arguments and prerequisites that reasonable people can not deny. Such success criterion obviously sets high criteria for success and supporters of the argument of the writer can hardly meet philosophical discussions of interesting conclusions in areas other than formal logic such criteria Correctly point out. Is the premise of these arguments reasonable, at least for reasonable people, more reasonable than rejection?

From long ago people have been fascinated by the relationship between individuals and their society. Many themes of contemporary sociology research have also been studied by ancient philosophers who wish to depict an ideal society including social conflict, economics, social cohesion, power theory (Hannoum 2003). In the 13th century, Chinese historian Ma Tuanlin first considered social mechanics as an important part of his earlier encyclopedia "General Studies of Literary Ruins" historical development. In the next century, the emergence of historians was thought to be the world's first sociologist, Tunisia's Ibn Khardun (1332-1406). He is interested in building the foundation of contemporary sociology and economics, including research on social conflict theory, comparison of nomadic life and sedentary life, explanation of political economy, and tribal social bonds I have written many topics of. Power capacity (Hannoum 2003) In the 18th century, philosophers of the age of enlightenment proposed a general principle that can be used to explain social life. Thinkers such as John Rock, Voltaire, Emmanuelle Kant, Thomas Hobbs, and others have written a theme that leads to the social reform they want, to answer what they perceive as social illness. Mary Wollstonecraft (1759-1797) wrote an article about the social situation of women. Her work has been neglected for a long time by the male academic structure, but since the 1970's Wollstonecraft has been widely regarded as the first feminist thought. Early in the 19th century, with the Industrial Revolution, improvements in liquidity and new forms of employment have undergone major changes. It is also an era of great social and political turmoil and the empire's rise has exposed many people - for the first time - to society and culture outside themselves. Millions of people moved to town, many of them abandoned traditional religious beliefs Auguste Comte is regarded as a father of sociology for many people. (Photo provided by Wikimedia Commons) Karl Marx is one of the founders of sociology. His views on social conflicts still have a practical meaning today. (Image provided by John Mayall / Wikimedia Commons) The history of sociology is based on social and ideological changes in Western Europe and the United States, especially in pragmatism in America and America. In the emergence of American sociology, the contribution of classical sociological theorists such as Dulchem, Marx, Weber was studied with prominent scholars. In order to explain social life, students should be familiar with major sociological methods - functionalism, conflict theory, symbolic interactionism, exchange theory and feminist theory. Starting with the question "what makes society possible" students should understand how population formation, collective behavior, social organization, and accompanying changes are explained. Sociology; Sociology 367 Sociology theory history; Sociology 348 Technology and society, or sociology 349 Environmental social movement, or sociology 353 Environmental justice; course selected from economics 177 Micro economics Environment principle, or political world Whitman's Political Ecology or Political Science or Political Science Politics Ecology or Political Science in Whitman's Food System 309 American West Environment and Politics, Another 4 Credit Sociology Course, 490 Current Problems in Social Sociology, and Sociology 492 Article or sociology 498 Honor thesis, Environmental research 488 Advanced project or 498 honor project

Aubade is a poetry with a dawn, characterized by parting of lovers. This special advice explains the morning of the speaker's life, he seems to have to go to work, or there are other jobs that require him to get up at 5 o'clock. Early in the morning, the outside is still dark, the sky stars and the moon still looks bright. The outside temperature is so cold that it will greatly affect the way he expresses things in poetry. Now, since we start at dawn, Purgatorio's Kant I became the captain of the Provence literature from the Italian Orbs, Arbu and Aruba. This song - the song of the dawn, this song is overturning the erotic lyrics tradition of Provence's poetry in many respects, the dawn has become an unpleasant moment for the loved ones to leave, and now the last wonderful It will be time and at last the pilgrim can continue to draw The poet can continue to draw and literally map the journey and can sail or send the metaphor as he wants - he can use I will Aubade (her name means "morning song") to listen to "the sap rise rising theme" in the greenhouse: What is fuga? How does Pinchin use the fugue-like structure in this story? Please find his "human body" and "repetitive melody". Toni Cade Bambara (1939 - 1995) In addition to writing many stories and novels, Toni Cade Bambara is also a civil rights activist, teacher and editor. Herlem resident living in Harlem reflects a deep understanding of urban space and has traveled extensively to Atlanta during the adulthood to Cuba and Vietnam. Mayor of Jim Kenny and the police chief Richard Ross Jr. sat in a grand wooden office meeting table and answered Newsweek questions on stop weeks and search. When I asked the first question, Kenny suspended his police. Kenny later said in an interview "Police did something in Rizzo era - police chief." The mayor of the time accused the police against himself from 1968 to 1980 and the atrocities of his officers. Kenny explained Rizzo Nian as a citizen who can choose whether to quickly track or hit the police. "You did what you said, if you did not do it fast enough, you will open your head.This is what we are dealing with this one month. Please correct it within. "

Many students are participating in sports activities both inside and outside the school. Only 4 students said they did not serve communities, the two students said they did not do physical activity. Most students know where I want to go to college, but I feel that my grades are not ideal or that the extracurricular participation is too low. Of the 30 students studied, 23 respondents said they felt that they chose to attend more universities at school clubs and sports. According to a survey, high school counselors influence the students 'future plans by encouraging the students' expectations. The majority of students in the 10th and 12th grades studied believe that counselors desire that they go to college despite their ethnic background. The expectation of high school students' education is rising with the passage of time. Students trained as counselors by a counselor can effectively help students with problem behavior in the sixth grade adapting to junior high school. In one study, the counselor cooperated with the peer coordinator of the 8th grade for 6 weeks a week, (a) build aid relations, (b) use very useful answers, (c) advance group discussion, (d) I focused on the method. )) Use the 4 step problem solving model. Coordinators have shown that they can help them in the schools experiencing problems, especially their attendance rate, school record and attitude towards school. High school teenagers want to adapt to the effects of change, delay, study habits, sleeping habits, and becoming high school students, so it is difficult to switch from high school to high school. Teenagers are afraid of failure and are suffering from change. The sense of losing control is usually accompanied by change (Kant). The transition from high school to high school is a big change. High school students will be more free and teachers will no longer allow the students to determine the specific method best suited to their brain's way of synthesizing the presented information. The environment studied also affects productivity and work quality. Attitudes are an important factor fighting the delay. Acquiring an early attitude to maintain a healthy learning habit helps students understand how to deal with many other tasks in different situations.

"What is accepted as today's knowledge may be abandoned tomorrow." As long as we can think, assertions to explain how to explain incredible things in the early attempts You can not use. These propositions can actually prove to be true to the fact. In the scientific sense, I touch on the problems that have been observed. Changes in any general circumstances Modern knowledge theory was introduced with his "critic system" by famous philosopher Emmanuel Kant. Some authors believe that knowledge is part of the philosophy of the term epistemology, but now it has evolved into independent science. Education of knowledge, organization of libraries, and many other very practical implementations. For me, knowledge theory is the most useful subject at school as it provides me the basis for solving any problems, questions and challenges in my daily life. The way we study and think about knowledge is a tool in our hands. According to the knowledge theory guide issued on behalf of the International Baccalauré Organization (IBO), the purpose of the Knowledge Theory Course is to encourage students to "consider the nature of knowledge and ponder all learning processes". They study subjects and connect with them as part of the diploma program. "Knowledge theory courses, creativity, behavior, services (CAS), and extended papers form the three core elements of the IB curriculum and require IB diplomas:" Educate everyone " At the center of the IB Diploma is the Knowledge Theory (ToK) course. It is a central element of IB research and summarizes the main knowledge students learn in various subjects. The ToK course "encourages critically thinking about knowledge itself and attempts to help young people understand the problems they encounter" (ToK Discipline Guide). For each subject, it is important to know what kind of knowledge and how to master it. In this sense, ToK is an adhesive that connects various scholarly elements of the IB Diploma. Finally, the IB ToK course is evaluated in two parts. - 1200-1600 articles written in titles chosen from six lists provided by IB

In Novel Segu, Maryse Conde beautifully constructed a personal and depth image of the history of Africa, using the four protagonists depicting the family's struggle and importance in today's Mari. These four characters with names of Tiecolo, Shiga, Nava, Maropari and their brothers face the world of their beloved town, Bambara, with the new custom of Islam and the development of European business and slave trade. These new expansion in Africa has become a foothold for Brother Troll who brought victory and heartache to them and their families. The book "Segu" is a novel written by Maryse Conde. This novel was created in 1797 and tells the story of Africans of that era. Interestingly, Kant was able to create a novel that made her character life the most visible evidence of the lives of people living in Mari. Clearly, the issue of religion, norms and tradition is explained as an important aspect of society that affects the people of Old Mali. Thanks to Kant's wonderful story, I was fascinated by Mari's character and history Seary of Maryse Conde uses a concrete illustration of Mary Se Conde's novel Segu. This discusses how the impact of Islam on Bamber society affects people's traditions, political, social and economic practices. Before Muslims arrived, Segu and his people, Bambaras, were very different from their world under the rule of Islam. - One of the biggest problems in the sexual reproduction of animals is conflicts of interest between women and species men. For example, multiple crosses have been shown to greatly improve the fertilization rate of men, but recent studies have shown that multiple crosses are also beneficial for women. In Novel Segu, Maryse Conde beautifully constructed a personal and depth image of the history of Africa, using the four protagonists depicting the family's struggle and importance in today's Mari. These four characters with names of Tiecolo, Shiga, Nava, Maropari and their brothers face the world of their beloved town, Bambara, with the new custom of Islam and the development of European business and slave trade. - Early in the 20th century, except for one country, Africa as a whole went to the hands of Europeans. Despite all the factors of these countries Ethiopia defended the Italians in Adwa's battle in 1896. Unfortunately, when the Italians invaded the second time in 1935, the Ethiopians were not so successful. Why did Ethiopia defeat when they won 50 years ago?

Chapter 1: The Right of War Since 1795, when Immanuel Kant published a paper on "eternal peace" in his later years, many people this is a corroborated fact that war is a destruction of all good and evil I believe. And the origins of all evil. Everyone in history has taught, but nobody believes that struggle among countries can not be avoided, and growth of civilization is considered to be the power that war has to produce. However, without being influenced by human theories and changes in the times, war has moved from one country to another, repeating weapon conflicts, proving its destructibility, creativity and purification. For the first time in the First World War, chemical weapons were deployed on a large scale. The fear of millions of dead soldiers in entrenchment and battlefield shocked the "Geneva Protocol" signed by the country in 1925 and promised not to use chemical weapons and biological weapons in future wars. While some people may be skeptical about the effectiveness of these disarmament efforts and the challenges faced by disarmament, the Armament Treaty plays an important role in the regulation and reduction of stockpiling, the use and testing of certain weapons in conflict I will fulfill. Using forbidden weapons constitutes war crimes Another factor that enables us to evaluate the extent to which World War I (WWI) is a full-fledged war is the use of all available weapons and all resources. By the time of World War I, several new interventions were taking place, which means that a new weapon was discovered, which in turn means that the First World War is over the previous war It means. The war is continuing. By the time of the First World War there was already an internal combustion engine that enabled the production of cars, which meant that people could travel faster and build aircraft in 1903. Other weapons used during the First World War included tanks used first by the UK in the Le Somme campaign in 1916 against Germans (first used), and in 1915 Germans first introduced chlorine and lung Included was a gas consisting of stimulus. use

Sansiba · Kumar-K Bijaya Lakshmi starrer 'Baadal and Roshanral Pratapgarh and President Pratibaddha Prayaas Kurukshetra (PP) (1966) Eternal mana de song having the lyrics Javed Anwar and Ukashanna at the inception during the' APNE liye jiye "at the Multicultural Arts Center Kurukshetra, Music April 30, 2017 Role of" SWARA TARANG "with PPK 'APNE lIYE JIYE. Dr. Arunkant and the music of Song provided by his team. Justice Surya Kant, Guest of the Punjab State and Haryana State High Court Director at the time of the establishment nahi ahin castle dosre mulkon I SAB facility WO HM APNE bachon KO dosre murk study k liye bhejte hine .. kya y kam example HY ka hamre han hian esca sabse BARA elctronic media KA HY They ... APNE Murk k bachon KO SAB WO bcoz technology seleted research DETE hain..jis Hein ,, geography JESA channal GHR GHR aata HY js SE duniya KI news maloom's HoTI hain..islamic program aatey Hain aatey BHT itself beneficial program itself bachon KI zahanat KA sabse aehm qirdar ADA Yasuda HY Television BTT SEE Performance KI channal aatey hain..js SE B Different AUR dosre SiRF company kuch talent sekhte hein balke KER LETE Hein Enjoy B itself Hut KER's APNE passand study cheezon ヲNA bachey RA RA RA From J RA RA r from Tall RA Li Yi to main tumko's Husband request DD Islamic quiz 1 (after January 1st) Yasuda MUS MUS MUS MUS MUS MUS MUS MUS MUS MUS MUS MUS MUS MUS MUS MUS MUS Brown Chachacha Musa KI qabr bata DETA raakh KE EK janib par LAL NE KIS KE liye jannat Hallam. EK ladki AUR kaishin KI kahani uske niqaab pahanne KE BAAD usne kaafi dea · virtue dusron KE liye nahin khoobsoorat Hung EK candy KE piece aiming for the castle of nihin hai of Ki tarah. Mohtmah harlemadeena SHAREEF SE hazir Hua Huang, USS hadees KO sun'ne KE liye castle mujhko musalmano KO Hallam SE bachne AUR EK musht Muslim EK HO Muslim hurt feeling pasbani 's KE liye voice maulana Abdas thummi agar ghair Muslim castle Bhutan I haram khane khate h usme KYA ham [Urdu. Ek Hun Muslim Haram 's KI pasbani' s KE liye essay Urdu SAAL pahele 's KI baat his jab my single KI padhai KAR Laha tha Diwali KI My main uncle' s aunt 's KE chuttiyon Sarwoor Aram (SAW) NE mujhe SE daryaft farmiya KE APNE eihle WA aiyal KE liye kitna MAAL COLA, MA nearz KIA KE AIN KE liye nisf MAAL CHOR SAIHON, itne MA Hua Rat Aba · Baker (RA) apna (KAL) MAAL laiker hazir Hove, Hazoor (SAW) NE AIN SE farmaya KE TUM NE APNE eihle WA iyal KE liye Kia Cora? unho NE jawab mi ampa caa mind AIN KE liye Allah AUR AIS KA rasole kafi hai. Aise waqt ma ma mi mp APNE rare ma ma faisala ka ma mi amp kisi baat ma mi A SE SE sabqat nahi le ja sakta. Hasanbasli (RA) farmate Hein KE AIK murtaba Has Rat Abu Baker Sadik (RA) Jab sadqa laiker hazir Hove TU AIS KI maaliyat KA Itsuaru kiye baghair Hazoor (SAW) kafi Hi SE aarz Kia KE is a sadqa's sadqa HAI wallah mujhe AAB Allah HI. Hazrat Hello Omer Farouk (RA) BHI sadqa Le KER hazir duno MA itna of faraq high jitna TUM sadqaat AUR AIS KI maaliat Zahir karke kehne LAGE KE mujhe AAB khuda KA sahra Hello kafi high .Rasool Khuda (SAW) NE farmiya KE TUM duno KE hob KE ilfaz ma m farame ocean

After becoming a famous and successful intellectual, Kant began his work. "The only possible argument to prove the existence of God" is the initial work "Universal History and New Interpretations" to form a primitive theory of why God exists and criticizes others It is an important task to use. . The theory to do this. This book helps him grow up as a writer, and his followers begin to shape. He writes several books and articles. They all have similar themes. I separate the thinking method from philosophy and mathematics. A general context defines "natural" as the whole physical world. Everything that exists exists in nature. All rights that we have respected in the past, present, or future are inherently respected. Therefore, all right is "natural" right. Unfortunately, this definition may be logical, but it does not capture the meaning of "natural" which is important in the "natural rights" specialty. However, it proves the difficulty of deducing natural things. Since the arrival of mankind there is a strange fact that strange existed. It exists in nature and exists in many species. If it is actually 'unnatural', it will not exist and it will not exist. It is unscientific to relate 'nature' to human's regeneration ability or potential as strange beings do not preclude the existence of linearity. Everyone does not need to copy so that human beings will continue to exist. According to the evidence, there are 7 billion people on the planet, the largest number ever. As mentioned earlier, some strange people will copy (some people will not copy) In addition, this property has two existences, a single one and a soul one. According to various existence, the accident follows the above characteristics. According to a single diversity, a single property has multiple occurrences. However, according to the first consideration, absolute consideration, these existences are not suitable for nature itself. Because it is wrong to say that human nature exists in this singular form, if the existence of this singular form is appropriate for human, it will never exceed this singular form. . Likewise, if it exists in this singular form unsuitable for humans, it never appears in this singular form. However, it can be said that humans, not humans, have this characteristic. That is, it is a feature in it, or in the soul. This possible property is based on all individuals

It is important to explain why the topic you are discussing is important, especially if there are other topics that you can research instead of the topics you are discussing. In this case, his ontological debate with St. Anselm is being discussed. There were other arguments about the existence of God before St. Anselm, and the first paragraph will explain why it is important to study this particular argument. Then the argument itself is given and discussed. As with most arguments in the philosophical field, ontological debates also contest. But I found that the ontological argument of St. Anselm is the most compelling one of all these discussions I know well. After reading and understanding this discussion, it is like returning to where I started - ignorance. I have the same dissent as other philosophers who believe that this argument is in the circle. According to St. Anthony's view, perfection means that other bigger beings can not be imagined. Perfection means presence. Without perfect attributes, certain things will not be perfect. Ontological arguments are transcendental arguments. These arguments try to prove the existence of God from the meaning of the word God. Anselm of Canterbury introduced an ontological argument to his work 'Proslogion'. The classic argument of Anselm is based on two principles, the most important of which are St. Anselm and Rene de Carte of the above Canterbury. If he does not exist, you can still think of a bigger existence (it is like you said that God does not exist besides this existence). Presence must be one of the attributes of God. Because by removing it it is still possible for you to understand the bigger god (the god that exists). The most common problem with this discussion is that it only seems to enumerate the existence of God's attributes and does not seem to indicate it. This argument seems to indicate that any fact you can imagine should be true. St. Anselm proposed the first ontological argument and relied on God as the definition of the greatest complete existence. If this concept exists in the mind, God also exists in reality. Kant criticized the ontological argument and pointed out that the definition of any concept depends on a series of attributes or predicates, and that there is no such predicate. In his "critique of practical reason" he stated that "building a belief in God (and the immortality of the soul) as a rational, reasonable and practical rational hypothesis, that is what he calls I invested the majority. Moral assertion "

This means that everyone can suffer, so there is no reason not to take into account the suffering. Even if the pain is different, it does not change the fact that it suffers. He added that it does not contain objects that are unaffected. This may mean that living things can not be compared with animals. In addition, Singer recognized that scientists testing animals are superior to experimenting humans. He said that "ordinary adults have the mental ability to afflict more people than animals under the same circumstances" (Singer, 59). Other philosophers believe that animals should be respected because they feel pain and suffering. Peter Singer supports this view in his book "Animation of Animals". The singer is a Utilitarian - actions of good and evil are characterized by the amount of happiness and pain they produce. In his view, good behavior will bring the greatest benefit to the greatest people. Singer believes that animals may experience pain and suffering, so we need to calculate the benefits of animals. Many scientists believe that animal experiments have not been replaced and should be used in the future. Many scientific discoveries and medical miracles enable us to live comfortably by using animals for our research. They believe it is best to test the mouse and the rabbit first. This is called comparative utility This week I will study Peter Singer and Tom Regan's work. Both are focused on animal rights. The singer 's point of view is formed through a Utilitarian perspective and Reagan is Kant. Although there are differences, neither argument raises a reasonable basis for the rights of animals, and I can shake among beliefs on this subject. Unfortunately, I have found that each discussion has some flaws, so my position on animal rights remains the same. With the animal liberation movement, Peter Singer explained that animals should consider benefits equally, which means that they should be concerned about happiness as they are human beings. In essence it is immoral to use animals in ways that produce all forms of torture and suffering. This view arises from the utilitarian view that the goal of our lives is to maximize happiness and minimize pain. Let's first look at Peter Singer's point of view. He is a Utilitarian. Utilitarians are the largest number of people who believe in the greatest number. Singers want to consider the suffering of animals. He said: "There is no moral reason for refusing to acknowledge this pain if a person is suffering, regardless of the nature of life, the principle of equality is that its suffering is done with the same attention as the victim It needs to be treated ... "This means that the suffering of animals is irrational. He also said he believes that the main way to stop pain in animals is to stop experimenting with animals. He said: "To test whether certain substances are safe for humans, or to test some psychological theory about severe punishment or learning effects ...", in other species General method to experiment. When he talks about animal experiments and pain

Moral and moral philosophy is very important for personal success. But let me give you some background before why moral philosophy is so important and I will tell you how it will help my life. Rational knowledge has two elements. These components are important and formal. Formal knowledge is based on reason, not object-oriented. Formal knowledge is logic, or the law of thinking. Material knowledge is object oriented and has two elements. These two elements are natural and ethical. Moral philosophy includes a moral ontology, a moral ontology where the moral ontology studies the moral origin, moral recognition. A variety of ethical systems have been proposed, including a moral ethics system that follows a set of established rules, and a normative ethical system that takes into account the merits of the behavior itself. An example of a normative ethical philosophy is the golden rule, stating that "a person should treat others like someone else." Ethics (also known as moral philosophy) is a philosophical field to solve moral problems. The term "moral" is often used interchangeably with "moral" and sometimes it is used more narrowly to express the moral principles of a particular tradition, group or individual. It distinguishes between ethics and morality. "The morals and ethics of people are the same, but there is a usage that limits morality to institutions such as Emmanuel Kant, based on concepts such as responsibilities, duties, principles, etc. To further advance Aristotle's practical inference approach, Concepts based on virtue often protect ethics and often avoid separating "moral" considerations from other practical considerations. Universalism is synonymous with moral universalism, and a compromise between moral relativism and moral absoluteism. Utilitarian ethical theory of maintaining behavior is moral only if it maximizes welfare. This is a form of resultism and welfareism. Utopianism is a number of social and political movements based on the idea that heaven can be accomplished on the ground, as well as numerous religious and secular literature. See Utopia. Value pluralism believes that there is a possibility that two or more moral values ​​are equal (true), but there is contradiction. Furthermore, in many cases, we assume that this incompatible value may be reasonably unboundable. Therefore, value pluralism is a theory in meta ethics, not an ethical theory or a series of values ​​itself. Oxford University historian Isaiah Berlin was acknowledged in the first substantial research on value diversification and attracted the attention of the general academic community.

Morality is a rule stipulating which actions are correct and which actions are wrong. Morality can be applied to the whole society or personal beliefs. Sometimes morality can be gathered from stories and experiences People who began to tell lies must tell others to look like they have told a lie. Sooner or later they will annoy him. - From "Monkey and Dolphin" It shows a bad trend of using a friend who is suffering. - From "Bulls and Goats" Even if you say the truth, you will not believe liars. - From 'Shepherd's Boy and Wolf' People who think they are not mine are just ridiculous. - From "crow and crow" All these different stories provide a good moral example, each ethics includes important ethics and important learning experiences. It is an example of morality. (Unknown) Acquired on October 25, 2018 from https://examples.yourdictionary.com/examples-of-morals.html Examples: - There are many examples where we are seeing the worldwide use of ethical universalism. Regardless of your gender, the most common example of moral universalism is equality in the workplace. This is the most common example of moral universalism when the world's ethics and morals are used without hesitation in all countries. Racism is a way of judging the morality or culture of a particular place, country, or organization based on standards established by specific individuals, groups, or countries. This technique is very narrow and not widely accepted. Ethnocentricism is mainly considered to be subtle and obvious in that way. There are many possible ways to evaluate ethical issues. In most cases, people tend to consider ethical issues from a specific perspective. For example, the moral perspective of a person may be based on rules, or focus on the possible outcome of a particular moral choice, or from a person's intuition or conscience. Here are some ethical ways proposed by philosophers: Is there a correct way of action in all or in most cases? If so, can we know what it is? This is a standard question of the entrance college ethics course. Usually by studying how great philosophers (Aristotle, Kant, Mill, Hume etc) think about this problem for analysis Many philosophers consider intrinsic value to be indispensable to various moral judgments. For example, according to the basic form of resultantism, whether an action is morally correct or incorrect depends on whether the outcome is inherently superior to any other actions that can be performed in such a situation Only relevant. Many other theories also believe that correct or erroneous practices are related at least in part to the intrinsic value of the results of actions that can be taken. In addition, as is generally believed, if morally responsible is a function of human correctness or error, the intrinsic value also seems to be related to the judgment of responsibility. Finally, the judgment of moral virtue and vice is also thought that virtue is a good thing and bad is a bad thing, so it will lead to problems of intrinsic value, in a way closely related to this value It is done.

I think that Hume's morals can be described as virtue ethics I am referring to the idea that which role will take precedence over action and action principles: practical with gentle role guidance and constraints Discussion. In traditional utilitarianism and Kant Ethics, personality is subject to actual deliberation. Only virtue is necessary to motivate benign behavior. I first outlined this approach with Aristotle's ethics and compared it with Hume. I think that the good character of Aristotle is understood as "self love". True self enthusiasts are most interested in using characteristics of judgment, selection, judgment, and removal. Hume studied moral judgment and started looking for meaning of moral terms. Hume does not find observable facts and logical relationships that answer the concepts of good, justice, moral virtue, but the function of moral terms is not to express quality or relationship but "recognized emotions" . I do not have any emotions in my judgment. The reason we call it good is the same as what we call beauty. If that object is comfortable immediately, or if it is a useful means to obtain other pleasant items, that object is good. Virtue is a "natural virtue" such as talent, wisdom, kindness, whether it is "human virtue" such as honesty or justice, makes a person happy or useful to himself or to others It is quality to be. In his work "Humanity theory", David Hume divides virtues into two categories, artificial virtue and natural virtue. Hume pointed out that courage is a natural virtue in paper. Among the paper's "pride and humility, its purpose and cause", Hume clearly shows that courage is the cause of pride. Witness, goodwill, learning, courage, justice, honesty, all these are the reasons for pride, and the opposite of their humility. In his argument about natural virtues, Hume 's debt to Greek ethics can be seen more clearly. Among them, the important group (consisting of courage, generosity, ambition, etc.) is based on self esteem and may even be a kind of self-esteem: "We call it a heroic virtue, it's great Praise the soul under sublime character.Stability and perfection of pride and self-esteem, or main engagement to that passion ... courage ... and all other shining virtues clearly among them It is a strong self-esteem and it is derived from their origin. A big advantage "(Hume, essay, 599-600). However, these virtues based on self-esteem must be influenced by the second group including generosity, compassion, loyalty, friendship, and otherwise the courageous qualities are "tyrant and public robber It is suitable only for making "(Hume, Treatise, 603)

Christine Mangen's first novel "Orange" is a three-man tried to pull the body from the sea area near Tangier, what kind of birds are eye-catching, and the weight of the body is lower than the weight I wondered whether it is excellent. Living weight But then, we really started to promote the development of this story. Unnamed: "I'd like to talk to you, are you comfortable sitting? This is the allegory of child's love and honesty, this is a story about the friendship between the two boys Drama This Is an adventurous story, a story of tragic love, an unforgettable pleasure and a painful story.You will like this. "This novel contains several different themes: sanctity of human life , Religious extreme. The danger of doctrine, here and now, our obsession, the bondage of marriage. . . Many people are troubled to engage these days lately. Do you want to know if you thought more? It removes the theme, but that is not a problem. There is nothing that is irritated by an uncontrollable person. Let's start talking about business! Dark characters, interesting stories, emotional settlement scenes. . . This is the best novel I have ever read. Let's see, where should I put it? Oh, you! Spencer's book is part of a memoir and is part of a sensational example. Spencer got a postgraduate degree in journalism from the University of California, Berkeley, he talks with reporters' eyes and understands the facts and details. The story of love, death, justice, deception, comedy, and revenge comes from his short, readable, persuasive book. Private icon financials show the best and worst of humanity. Spencer encountered a man who wanted to prove his parent-child relationship from a frozen tampon, a man who was hidden in society, awaiting fortune, a sad man. My mother wants to prevent her tragedy from happening again. This book also includes cheating husband, felony wrestler, Florida hidden crime, awkward fraudster. Clancy Martin outlines some philosophical views on fraud and truth in his book 'Love and Lie: Growth and Truth, Deliberation, Care of Porn Love'. In the Republic, Plato supported the paternalistic concept of "nobility lies". In contrast, Kant 's lie is always wrong. Ethical behavior is free behavior. In other words, based on the reasons for liberty, people's choices must be free (not by fraud or compulsion).

Philosophers have always been interested in political and social issues. They not only ask how politics works, they mainly ask what they should do. These philosophers have been interested in the essence and justification of political obligations and authority and the purpose of political behavior. Their doctrine is different, and many doctrines are conceptually utopias, but they all have the same view and belief that political philosophers are responsible for distinguishing existing political systems from potentially more human systems Share. What is it, and what should it be? . Topics related to social philosophy and political philosophy are not boring or important. The philosopher's theory of discussing these topics has nothing to do with the theory of society. Philosophers' views on these issues directly or indirectly lead to revolution and legislation as well as many social and political activities in countries around the world. Today, the big problem facing the United States and the world involves conflicts between individual interests and collective interests, which is a big problem of wealth and income inequality. The idea of ​​distributing justice and the form of government provide this justice, which involves solving this conflict. Philosophers participated in a conference on homeless, alleging homeless was a political problem and Albrecht Welmer openly discussed the differences between social and political problems. Philosophers found Kant 's "judgmental criticism" in "political philosophy without written language" and extended it to the "reflexive judgment" theory of specific circumstances as the basis of value. Philosophers define the action as equal to freedom and use the terms "animal laboratory", "homosexual" and "zoo politics" to express labor, work and active living under human conditions . The author of the book "The Life of Mind" criticized the user about "abolishment of moral responsibility" and "stock price expression" in the book "New Yorker" published in 1963. Ask a philosopher to report the trial of the Nazi official in Eichmann in Jerusalem at 10 o'clock.

Stars: Required car safety function Finally, three years after, my car broke down. I bought Geo Prizm '76, I thought it was not bad at high school. The car will be a perfect gift for graduation. Okay, as I go to college, I need something that keeps me safe and lasts more than three years. Also, because we lock the key of the car in the car, you need a car with a password outside the car so you can pick up the key without contacting the police. The car has various kinds of safety functions. Various security functions have their own functions. The car needs nine very important safety functions. They are seatbelts, airbags, head trauma prevention, head restraint, anti lock brake system, traction control, all wheel drive, electronic stability control and weight. The two safety functions discussed in this report are airbag and traction control. These two security features will appear even in most Hyundai vehicles. Volvo is always a benchmark for advanced automotive safety technology. The new Volvo XC 60 will debut at Geneva next month and will further enhance the safety awareness of Swedish manufacturers with new advanced driver assistance features designed to prevent potential accidents. The main new feature is the updated urban security model. In addition to placing an automatic brake, the technology also includes steering support for individual braking to avoid accidents. In use, the car provides automatic steering assistance to avoid urban obstacles that can cause an accident, but it is only valid between 31 and 62 miles per hour. In addition, the Volvo XC 60 will be equipped with a new oncoming lane mitigation system that uses steering assist technology to prevent collision with vehicles on future lanes. We recently purchased a new car with all the latest safety features. It is not Tesla, and will not drive on its own - but when the safety function operates, the car almost takes over, brakes quickly, and even the driver snoozes and turns to bring the car back to the lane . Excitingly, it is not difficult to imagine that we will sit and move the car from point A to point B in the future. In his speech, Rahwan proposed two ethical choices, and AI-driven autonomous vehicle programmers need to consider - doubt that these cars need to follow certain prescribed ethics Because it is not. The scenes being described are inspired by two famous philosophers, Jeremy Bentham and Immanuel Kant

My research paper will gather information on the relationship between Venus and its planet. As Venus is in it, I will introduce some of the creative backgrounds of the solar system. Please talk about Venus' planet and its atmospheric characteristics. After that, several exploration of Venus was shown. There are several theories about how our solar system was made. However, the widely accepted hypothesis called this nebula was first introduced by Emanuel Swedenborg and later introduced by Immanuel Kant and Pierre Simon de la Plas. (Pierre Simon De Laplace) further studied in the 18th century. The Earth's planet is the four innermost planets of the solar system, Mercury, Venus, Earth and Mars. They are called land because they have rock surfaces as small as the Earth. Planets, Venus, Earth and Mars all have wonderful atmospheres, but Mercury is rare. The figure below shows the approximate distance from the sun to the planet on the planet. Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune are known as Jupiter (Jupiter-like) planets. Because they are huge compared to the Earth and have the same gas characteristics as Jupiter. Jupiter's planet is also known as a giant planet, but some or all of them may have a small solid core. The image below shows the approximate distance between Jupiter's planet and the sun. Four are planets of the Earth, including Mercury, Venus, Earth and Mars. The other four are huge planets including Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune. Jupiter and Saturn are gas giants, Uranus and Neptune are ice giants. In August 2006, Pluto was declassified as a planet. Sorry about Pluto! In 2014, the discovered fictional planet Planet Nine was discovered, but its existence has not been confirmed. Jupiter is the largest planet in our solar system. Jupiter is about 11 times bigger than the Earth. Jupiter's mass is one thousandth of the sun, 2.5 times the mass of all the planets in the solar system. Jupiter also has the largest moon in the solar system and the moon Venus is the hottest world in the solar system. Venus is not the closest planet to the sun, but its dense atmosphere catches heat with an uncontrolled version of the warm earth's warmth. As a result, the temperature of Venus reached 870 degrees Fahrenheit (465 degrees Celsius), exceeding enough temperature to melt lead. Detectors that scientists landed survived only for several hours before being destroyed. Venus also has an atmosphere like hell consisting mainly of carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid clouds Scientists only detect traces of water in the atmosphere. Because the atmosphere is heavier than any other planet, the air pressure on the ground is 90 times that of the Earth. However, according to the model of NASA researchers at Goddard Space Research Institute, the planet might have been able to reside in the early days of Venus' history.

Keating stressed the importance of rebelling against his student, an important element of transcendentalism. For example, Keating allows students to exercise in the schoolyard. He instructed the students to march all at once and clap their hands. When Wilton's principal and film opponent Noran asked what he was doing to the boys, Mr. Keating said that they showed "a danger of compliance" to them. After his teaching skills were questioned, Keating said to him Spirituality Finally, American writers have created transcendence. Transcendentalism is a philosophical and literary movement seeking individual truth through spiritual reflexes, complete solitude, and deep connection with nature. As this was established by the author, many of them applied differently reflecting the transcendent beliefs and wrote different works. Ralph Waldo Emerson is considered a father of transcendentalism. He wrote many influential works. Transcendia focused on intuition and personal conscience, becoming a philosophical and literary movement in the 19th century. The transcendence founded by German philosopher Immanuel Kant was supported by writers such as Emmerson Thoreau and Fuller. These supporters believe that the basic truth is well-known, so you can not understand the feeling. The movie "Death Poems Association", which is applicable to the present age, describes the transcendental truth of independence and disobedience. This transcendental philosophy can be regarded as having positive and negative effects. Transcendentalism is religion, philosophy, literature and social movement of the 19th century. Essentially, this movement is based on the "sixth sense", the ideal of nature, observance of obedience, individualism, intuition, idealism, imagination, and inspiration. - Does everyone abandon everything and find that personalityism is a genius in the wilderness or another crazy person? Christopher McCandless is the protagonist of the novel "Into the Wild". Academically, he is an idealist, extremist, and wise. He has read books of Henry David Thoreau, Tolstoy, Jack London, and Ralph Waldo Emerson. Transcendence was the early philosophy, intellectual and literary movement that emerged in New England in the 19th century. Transcendentalism is a collection of new ideas about literature, religion, and philosophy. It began with discussions at the monotheistic church. At that time, the intellectuals started questioning and opposing many orthodox ways of the church, religion, culture, literature, social reform, and philosophy. They develop in turn

The apostle Paul tells us that God to prove the existence of God does not believe it to be reasonable or rational. In Romans 1:20, he writes that no one excuses not to believe in God, since all creations declare his people. Likewise, King David also said the same thing in Psalm 19: 1. Because what you can not see from the creation of the world can be seen clearly by what he is created, even by his eternal powers. And Godhead; And they have no excuse ... Mr. Armstrong summarized the evidence that God exists this way: "Creation is the proof of God!" This is because we saw birds and trees, looked at the starry sky, from now It does not mean that we are realizing the world. There is a god. As we show, creation around you provides scientific evidence to its creator. Evolutionists did not study this evidence in this context as their purpose was to explain creation without a creator. They combine numerous natural selection theories and mutations with spontaneous combustion theory, and they all have a certain validity. However, they only provide an unproven theory. When they propose their speculation, they assume and hypothesize The opposite is elaborateness inherent in all "a priori" or ontological evidence of the existence of God, ie sophistication of Kant's return to all evidence of the existence of God. He considers the specific concept of God as essential at the beginning of the evidence of the existence of God, and such concepts include the concept of existence of God. Of course, Kant is correct, and since the beginning it proved that certain concepts of God are necessary; after all, the evidence is trying to prove something. However, in the sense of evidence, this concept is simply an indication that there is no contradiction between God and existence, in other words, in order to prove the necessary concepts, the concept of "God exists" It is only a proposition that only requires a predicate. Structure of possibility to combine. There is absolutely no way to prove or refute the existence of God. Evidence of the existence of God is contradictory, every denial is like this. But at least for me, refusal seems to be more logical than any positive evidence. It seems that the evidence usually assumes that God exists. And, far from the form of God, reasonable unbelievers can accept God. And he watches everyone, has the best wisdom, and care about the dilemma, struggle, and the details of human life.

Discussion about artificial intelligence can be thought of. Or, to be more precise, we can develop true artificial intelligence in the meaning of human's thought and understanding machine. As computers become more complex, our lives become indispensable. This is an interesting question that is becoming increasingly important in our lives. Two articles "John Searle's" Thoughts, Brains, Procedures "and William Lycan's" Robots and Minds "present two different answers and pose several new questions. The history of the fight against these problems dates back to Plato and Aristotle, has many years of difference between Descartes and Kant, reflected in contemporary discussions on artificial intelligence and genetic research. Many problems focus not on the problem itself, but on how to answer them. "From the German experience in the mid-nineteenth century, the psychologist himself and other famous social philosophers of the 19th century believed that human thought had to be approached in two fundamentally different ways: science If the empirical method of research is clever, the memory of things that can normally pass through These can be measured and experimentally manipulated. The focus of this year is clear: artificial intelligence. Rather than forgetting to persuade a controversy, Steven Hawking's contribution ('artificial intelligence may be the best or worst thing for human beings') to discuss technology ethics - with regard to this topic too There are also many discussions. There is even a destructive speech by Sophia's robot and Max Tegmark on Life 0. As a female technology producer and organizer of Google's developer group, I organized many activities in both technical and non-technical for my community. But I always think about this question. How can we promote the diversity of science and technology activities better and make all participants' activities more practical? Is there any discussion about artificial intelligence? On the contrary, can we develop true artificial intelligence in the meaning of machines of human thought and understanding? As computers become more complex, our lives become indispensable. This is an interesting question that is becoming increasingly important in our lives. Two articles "John Searle's" Thoughts, Brains, Procedures "and William Lycan's" Robots and Minds "present two different answers to this question. What? Is A.I. possible? In SF movie 'Terminator directed by James Cameron', the computer in the movie is "smart", confronting the human master. In other words, the computer in the movie is independent of the programmer and can develop artificial intelligence (A.I.). This article proves that in the real world, computers do not achieve artificial intelligence, even even functionalism.

A false identity, a lie and a fraud, the Lucentio of The Taming of the Shrew, and Tom of a talented Mr. Ripley did all this. They all lied to what they liked and do. They all take the wrong identity to get the girl they want. There are many similarities in them, but the end of the comedy and the drama are quite different. Talented Mr. Ripley is a drama that ends with a tragedy, "Tame of the Taming" is a comedy that ends with happiness. Both Lucentio and Tom are trying to get what they want from people they trust. So I have to write articles to compare and contrast these two books. I have to compare three similar themes ... These themes are as follows. Lost failures, emotions and failures, and death ... My arguments are as follows: Holden Colefield and Hamlet, 2, each character shows signs of anxious loss. ... so we need to write articles to compare and contrast these two books Clancy Martin outlines some philosophical views on fraud and truth in his book 'Love and Lie: Growth and Truth, Deliberation, Care of Porn Love'. In the Republic, Plato supported the paternalistic concept of "nobility lies". In contrast, Kant 's lie is always wrong. Ethical behavior is free behavior. In other words, based on the grounds of freedom, person's choice must be free (not by fraud or compulsion). Regardless of whether it is a liar or the audience they are trying to deceive, the etymology of fraud tells the power to lie. The corruption comes from Latin spells, which means "capture, absorb, deceive, deceive." Every lie will in some way try to deceive someone in the story and cheat them to believe in you. Practice fraud is misleading, it is the center of lies. Although fraud is a powerful word, it is technically correct, but it is not actually used when hiding a surprise party or instructing friends to use good-looking goodwill. A lie. . Fraud is actually a lie with some kind of evil motive, it is not a kind of harmless fiber.

Another View of Moral Ethics Moral theory thinks the foundation of morality is the development of good character and virtue. If a person has virtue and there is no bad habit, that person is a good person. Several virtue theorists describe up to 100 benign features that will help make someone a good person. Since benign personality develops in adolescence, moral theory places particular emphasis on moral education, so adults are responsible for allowing young people to virtue. In virtue ethics, there are different opinions about the exact nature and meaning of virtue, and some theorists get inspiration from Plato and other ancient people for their theory. Modern virtue ethics is a relatively young movement in modern academic circles. Therefore, it was investigated, marked and not classified within the scope of result - and - duty theory. Objective recognition theory thinks that human beings must observe the world in a sensation and develop principles through reasoning based on these observations (incomplete but within specific parameters) in order to correctly predict the future I will. This indicates whether the prediction is in natural science, humanities, or moral sectors. Generalization and interpretation of ethical theory: resultism, morality, moral ethics and objectiveists ethical self-doctrine Morality is now widely recognized as an alternative to Kant and the theory of result ethics. However, moral philosophers were late to incorporate ethics into the subject of applied ethics. Furthermore, environmental virtue ethics is an undeveloped field of environmental ethics. Environmental ethics frequently uses moral evaluation (respect, consideration, nature love, etc.) and leads the attraction of role models (Henry Thoreau, Aldreauponto, Rachel Carson etc), but environmental ethics is completely understood Not. Modern virtue ethics research From the viewpoint of some scholars, virtue is considered highly likely to apply to the public sector. Aristotle first adopted virtue ethics (Lawton 1998). Moral ethics does not doubt the role of duty of moral judgment in the general moral order, even though it doubts the outcome of action. Ethics precedes the development of the moral qualities, motivations and intentions of each person (Trevino & Nelson 2010). - Many of us have role models in our lives Most people's role models are athletes and movie stars, but for me there are more examples. For me, the role model is not a selfish and greedy person but a person who positively influences someone in my life. They help shape someone's personality and identity. They are people who can ask for advice in difficult situations and know that they will give these words of wisdom.

Those that legalize political authority In this article, legitimate political authority is regarded as meaning that individuals and institutions have the right to control others in determining laws and freedom of protection Let's see. To investigate this problem, you need to look at the three theories - Hobbes, Rousseau, Rock and determine which theoretical political authority is most compelling. First of all, they should discuss their hypothetical starting point - the natural state to establish the basis of their political authority -. "Contractualism" refers to both the political theory of the legitimacy of political authority and the moral theory of origin or the legal content of moral ethics. Authoritative political theory argues that the legitimate authority of the government must come from the consent of control and that the form and content of such consent comes from the concept of contract or mutual agreement. Contractual moral theory argues that ethics draws normative force from the concept of contract or mutual agreement. Contractors are skeptical about the possibility of establishing moral or political authority within God's will or perfectionistic human nature. Social contractor theorists from the history of political thought include Hobbes, Locke, Kant, Rousseau. Most of contemporary contractors are moral theory, but contractors of political theory do not necessarily need to be contractors of moral theory. Or, the political theory is based on politics, freedom, justice, property, rights, law and authority, fulfillment of laws and regulations, what they are, why (or even it) need it, what rights and freedoms Why, what form should be taken, why, what is law, and what kind of responsibility do the citizens have against the legitimate government? Some people think that political philosophy is a sub-discipline of political science, but because discipline is approaching closer to the theoretical field of social science (economic theory etc), it is important for political exploration that is generally attributed to this form The name is political theory. Instead of philosophical arguments (such as moral philosophy and aesthetics). Anarchism in political philosophy has no legal political or governmental authority. In political philosophy, as well as people who are not anarchists, anarchicism is an important issue to consider as a political background, and various forms of political organizations are arranged, compared, and proved. Anarchists often considers anarchism as unhappy or unstable condition without legal authority. Anarchism as a philosophical idea is not always related to practical activities. Several political anarchists take actions to destroy what they regard as illegal countries. The imagination of the masses considers anarchists as nihilists who often throw bombs. But philosophical anarchism is a theoretical position. Further political reflections, political behavior, obedience and obedience theory are necessary to decide who should act based on (and) anarchist insight.

Epic transcending epic Steven poetry "John Milton Lost Paradise" was created during the UK religious revolution. In Milton's word, the theme of this epic is "the first disobedience of mankind" (line 1). In this blank poem, Milton refers to the story of Genesis, Eve is trying to make Adam eat "forbidden fruit". In the first five lines of this verse he stated that the beginning of death, suffering, fruit tree fruit forbidden by human recovery, its deadly preference [b], and all sorrow lost the garden of Eden It was. Until a bigger person loves us and regains the seat of happiness (lines 1 to 5). John Milton's great epic "Paradise Lost" lost in paradise for the Christian epic was written in the UK between 1640 and 1665 when the Western world changed rapidly. Milton, adhering to traditional Christian faith in his epic, he also combines with ancient epic style to make masterpieces. He chose the collapse of mankind as the theme of his wonderful work to create his own century, this is Two wonderful epics of England, "Fairy Quin" and "Paradise Lost" have long been criticized as critics. Many critics discussed epic themes and similarities in two British epic, but they are not addressing the deeper and deeper questions perfectly. For example, what is the ontological difference between the main epic (ie Homer) and the second epic (Virgil, Ariosto, Spencer and Milton)? What specific cultural and / or historical factors have influenced these secondary epics? As two books reviewed here will remind us, when defining "Fairy Quinn" or "Lost Paradise" as an epic, it must be an important space and time qualification. Depth and meaning Both English poets began writing scripts. When Milton announced his epic "Paradise Lost" in 1667, he solved the largest possible theme: the collapse of mankind in the Garden of Eden. By contrast, when Wordsworth wrote his epic in 1850, he wrote 400 pages of "overture" about his inner self-indulgent internal feelings. During the transition between the two writers, the atmosphere of the knowledge of Europe experienced fundamental change for enlightenment. In the Milton era, he can prove the existence of things in the outside world, as God guarantees that things remain stable. But in the days of Wordsworth, Immanuel Kant, one of the greatest philosophers, has been distinguishing things from things with us. This distinction known as Copernicus's philosophical revolution is a very basic today, but it has revolutionized philosophical thinking to show that our mind functions as a filter to perceive information It was.

An overview of John Rawls and social contract. John Rawls combines the earlier traditional social contract approach with more modern usage to create a chaotic social philosophical renaissance. Professor Rawls is not a reason to advocate civic authority or a form to adopt, but I am more interested in the principle of promoting a basic social system - though it assumes authority, but focuses on animation I am counting on you. In short, Rawls believes that "justice and fairness" should be the basic animation principle. The social contract theory began as a description of the origins and legitimacy of the country, especially in the works of Hobbes and Rock, but later thinkers like Rousseau, Emmanuel Kant and John Rawls also applied social contract theory. On the international stage (partly explains Grotius's international justice in the "Law of War and Peace"). In these applications, the state replaces citizens as parties to social contracts. The judicial part of social contract theory is based on the international treaties such as "Geneva Convention on Prisoner Handling" (if the country agrees with humanitarian treatment of prisoners) or the right to UN human rights declaration (States promise to realize various human rights) Can be used to review the provisions of the Convention In 1971, John Rawls promoted social contracts to regain attention by announcing the "justice theory". Later, he extended the model of "justice theory" to the international stage of the People's Law. Rawls uses a social contract model. And that calls him "justice and fairness" in the context of the country and "people's rule" at the international stage. Rawls' statement is purely normative and does not pretend to be an accurate descriptive statement about how each country interacts indeed. He explained his argument as the "ideal theory" of pursuing "realistic utopia." John Rawls' view of civil disobedience is different from Martin Luther King. He believes democracy is a social contract. He does not believe that people are "groups" with individual identities. In fact, Rawls argues that in democratic society, people who originally signed a social contract did not know their social, economic, or ethnic differences. He called it "pure veil" (Rolls). The primitive principle of these hypotheses agrees with the form of governance that treats everyone equally according to law. Since this contract includes democracy, a constitution is necessary. This includes the legislators who are responsible for making the law. Sometimes the law is unfair. However, as part of social contracts, citizens also signed the profit that democracy provides to them. As a result, citizens must comply with unfair laws

Humanity is philosophical; if morality exists in human nature, moral philosophy believes that human nature is philosophical. Observing moral models in human thoughts and behaviors usually involves analysis of introspection and behavior. Therefore, morality and philosophy are important themes in the current course entitled "Humanities science, large dialogue: reflexes and actions". However, the course calendar is written as follows. First let me say that morals are practical. Moral philosophy will be the philosophy of this practice. What I want to say is that the importance of moral philosophy is not the reason for taking action before acting but to understand the moral reflection after action. This is bold paper. If that is correct, it will add a special shadow to the current practice in Western academic philosophy. It turns out that itself is the cart problem, the "correct manufacturing function", or the correct way to kill a car. In other words, we are completely addicted to positive morality and tend to decide what is right in a series of environments. I would like to say that the correct role of moral philosophy is so to speak. Its purpose is not to help moral reviews, but to reflect morality. In the field of morality, or moral philosophy, research can systematically describe the theory of what causes correct behavior or wrong behavior. Moral philosophy is usually divided into three categories: meta ethics, applied ethics, normative ethics. Meta-ethics studies our moral value, where language and principles derive; it focuses on "moral?" Rather than "moral". And provide a practical solution to ethical problems. Normology ethics studies ethical standards that affect correctness and tort. The theory of normative ethics includes utilitarianism, consequentialism, contractileism, virtue ethics, and so on. Ethics (also known as moral philosophy) is a philosophical field to solve moral problems. The term "moral" is often used interchangeably as "moral" and sometimes more narrowly used to express the moral principles of a particular tradition, group or individual. Likewise, certain moral theories, especially moral ethics, distinguish ethics from morality. "The morals and ethics of people are the same, but there is a usage that limits morality to institutions such as Emmanuel Kant, based on concepts such as responsibilities, duties, principles, etc. To further advance Aristotle's practical inference approach, Concepts based on virtue often protect ethics and often avoid separating "moral" considerations from other practical considerations.

From the late eighteenth century to the early nineteenth century, the revolution was the collective tongue tip of the world. The French monarchy is being overthrown, and there are political and civil war in Europe. Among all this confusion, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel appeared and showed the historical analysis of the future, the understanding of human condition, and the end of history. What is the estimate? Because the sole purpose of the state is to bring forward positive change and freedom to individuals, the end of history will come from the state. Hegel was one of Kant's first major critics. In response to Kant's abstract and formal accounts he saw, Hegel proposed a moral concept focusing on the "moral life" of the community. But the concept of Hegel's "moral life" means to include Kant's ethics rather than to replace it. Hegel can be regarded as an attempt to protect Kant's concept of freed beyond reason and limited "desire". Therefore, compared to later critics such as Nietzsche and Russell, Hegel shared some of Kant's most fundamental concerns. Background information on Hegel and Feuerbach (Averneri, pp. 8-27) Marx felt Kant was "opposite" and "should" and he was interested in Hegel's philosophy. Hegel's philosophy provides a way to eliminate this dichotomy. By "to achieve idealism in reality". Marx later discovered that this dichotomy still exists in Hegel's philosophy and is hidden in the internal contradiction of his social and political institutional theory. Feuerbach provided Margel a methodological way of criticizing Hegel, a way of change. Hegel believes that thinking is the subject, and that existence is a predicate. But Feuerbach wants to study this subject in space and time to develop materialist philosophy. His method of change is based on people, subject, and thinking. Marx criticized Hegel's political philosophy to find the roots of Hegel's system. His argument about sovereignty (pages 18 to 19) is an example of his application of the modification method to criticize Hegel. Hegel believes the state is an abstracted entity from the social and historical forces that created it. He ignored the social background of interpersonal relations and streamlined the existing social organization. This is evident in discussions about Marx's ancient, medieval and contemporary politics (pages 21-23). Finally, Marx criticized Hegel's view that bureaucracy is "universal class". Marx believes that "the clear idealism of bureaucratic devotion to the overall well-being of society is only a cover for its own rough, materialistic purpose" (Averneri, p. 23) . "Democracy is the true unity of the general, special" (page 21). The current state of society is that individuals are no longer juxtaposed with society.

Sophocles's Antigone contains the first record example of the word αὑτοοοοος, the source of the word "autonomy". I believe that reconsidering human needs for autonomy is the core of this research. The reader who first focused on the play understood it difficult to recognize this difficulty as it was difficult to judge whether or not the behavior of Antigone in the drama should be considered autonomous I suggested that it is important. Several aspects of the antigone character seems to be harmful to understand her behavior during the play - a close relationship with her death, her death, and her death, and her rejection, Method defined by inheritance heritage - To explain the characteristics of useful morality itself, you can temporarily call it the autonomy of Antigone. How to understand this drama movement from the progression of Antigone by explaining that Kant is alienation of her unintended duty of her dead brother and recognizing and accepting her autonomy . In Kant's words, the self-concept "respects something completely different from life." Antigone's autonomy is to choose that she will die for himself and take responsibility. I think that this choice must be understood as her own choice as defined by her duty. Sophocles' Antigone believes that the moral ideal represented by Antigone can not survive, but this ideal is still essential for the moral pursuit of humanity. In another respect, the chorus told Antigone that she is an automaton. Literally, this means "your own rules". The English word "autonomy" does not convey the correct meaning, as personal autonomy is a condition that feels uneasy and skeptical for Greeks. Autonomous people are either beasts or gods and can only live within their own legal scope. Most of the English translation of Antigone has not chosen to add detriment to words. They tend to choose more soft terms to explain self-positive heroines. The best rendering may come from Wyckoff, which translates it into "your own behavior". Antigon is the only person who refuses to swing or is controlled by someone in the community. She is autnotnot and autonomos. For anti tone, knowledge and judgment are personal problems. Sophocles's Antigone contains the first record example of the word αὑτοοοοος, the source of the word "autonomy". I believe that reconsidering human needs for autonomy is the core of this research. The reader who first focused on the play understood it difficult to recognize this difficulty as it was difficult to judge whether or not the behavior of Antigone in the drama should be considered autonomous I suggested that it is important. Several aspects of the antigone character seems to be harmful to understand her behavior during the play - a close relationship with her death, her death, and her death, and her rejection, Method defined by inheritance heritage - To explain the characteristics of useful morality itself, you can temporarily call it the autonomy of Antigone. Antigone's autonomy is to choose that she will die for himself and take responsibility. In Sophocles' play "Antigone", the roles of Antigone and Kryon are opposite each other. A man named Polyneices, a brother of Antigone and nephew of Creon, is declared a traitor to Thebes. Antigon wanted to die rather than leaving his brother, but King Kryan believed that civil law was absolute. But only Antigone can really protect his morality. Antigone believes that her brother Polynesia should be buried. Antigone said, "Kryon has buried our brother Ethelus with the honor of the army ... but diversified .. .. fought bravely and died tragically (Sophocles 1022, 15-18) When she said these words to Ismane she made a clear statement of her view Wherever her brother is, they are her family and deserves respect.

People who do not have friends say "I will eat it," the author wrote in one of his most wonderful articles. Francis Bacon prose 's prose proposal "dry light" also gave us a good essay about "esthe" shining with special power in his article "friendship". Here, he did not explore the essence of friendship and will not explore his moral aspect (as some philosophers and essaysist like Montagne, Kant, and Emerson did) However, instead of that it turned to its usefulness. Please look at that "fruit". Brought to humans. People who do not have friends "eat their heart." And according to the writer, run the risk of insanity. His advice is experienced and practical. Bacon may be the person who first believes the need for immoral friendship, but this friendship is not due to kind people. "Human emotions are like liquid under pressure and need to be discharged, this emissions can only occur through a friend's exit." This is an article that plays a fundamental role in reading activities. Ethical problems concerning the importance of promoting non-hypocritical reflections and not over-emphasizing, and most importantly, relationships with others "Fruit" In this article, why friendship contributes to personality There are several highly convincing paragraphs, such as when you can explain briefly how you can do it and how to examine the book. Perhaps, as Michel Pakaluk wrote in his introduction, the most noteworthy proposal in this article involves self-knowledge clarifying our ideas, which inevitably leads to communication with others It is taking. For this reason, I have friends, not my family and colleagues. This is the two parts that we think is wonderful. The main result of friendship is the richness and peacefulness of the soul, peace and retreat of various emotions. You can open the liver with Sarza, open the spleen with steel, put the sulfur in the lungs, and give Beaver Run to the brain, but you can not open the receipt. Heart, but a true friend, you can give them sorrow, joy, fear, hope, doubt, advice, and any heart that suppresses it in cold colds and regrets Because the first is affection, the second result of friendship is understanding of health and sovereignty. Because of friendship, it is indeed a beautiful day in the storm and the storm; but it becomes whitish with understanding, darkness and confusion. This is not mere faithful advice, but a person gets from his friend; but before you understand this, no matter who is full of thoughts, his wisdom and understanding can communicate with others I will take it. We clarify, disassemble the discussion, make it easier to understand, make them more orderly and see it when it comes to words. Another hour of meditation "The main consequence of friendship" Francis Bacon wrote in his eternal meditation about this subject, "It is a relaxation and liberation of the soul's richness and expansion, all kinds of passion is caused and induced It is one of the most important rewards in life. " But in the ongoing debate about whether Facebook's "friendship" makes us more or less happy in today's cultural perspective of chaotic chaotic relationships between the various platforms, Friendship is worth thinking about something. This is what CUNY philosophy professor Massimo Pigliucci is exploring with Aristotle's answer. How science and philosophy led us to a more intuitive life (public library). Science has made this provocative interpretation. Culture and information - Sir Francis Bacon, Sir Francis Bacon is a magnificent architect with a revolutionary reality in reality, human thought has not defeated that model yet. He is neither a skilled scientist nor an excellent mathematician, but he is recognized as a creation of the philosophy of science and scientific methodology. I think that is his father. - 1. Select a painting from the viewpoint of (a) formalist, (b) expressionist, (c) and philosopher of "aesthetic experience" and analyze it. Which opinion do you think is most conv

Why is the sacred word "self" in the book so important? I have forgotten this book because I never actually read it. Paper Statement and My Settings .. It would be great if you could help me Thinking, positive self, subject and behavior of self-imagination and ongoing experience as an author of the organization. In Kant there is a difference between empirical self given in ordinary self-consciousness and transcendental or pure self. . In Freud's psychology, self is a conscious self and occupies a troublesome intermediate position between unidentified demands and super-repressive super-oppressive discipline. See also Cartesian self, personal identity. Contrary to what is sometimes thought, Buddhism does not deny itself or try to destroy it. However, Buddhist psychology tells us that self identity corresponding to Western self-concept is intellectual structure, not eternal self or soul. For more information about Buddhist doctrines concerning the essence of personal identity, see anātman. Personal Concept Ego is a part of the mind evolved from the personal experience to the outside world. It is in direct contact with the reality, focusing on the processing and evaluation of information on the importance and relationship between individual actions and behaviors. That is one of the three elements of Freud's theory. It is thought to be self developed from the identity, trying to harmonize the unconscious original request of identity, the constraint imposed by super go and the individual's understanding of the real world. The concept of das Ich (literally "I") has appeared in Freud's thought from the initial stage of psychoanalysis, but over the years it has undergone significant theoretical changes related to the progress of clinical practice It was. For a long time the word has been designated as a self-conscious person, but in 1923 Freud made it clear that the role of agents of psychological agencies with mediation and coordination functions related to identity, superego and external reality I gave it. . However, he always tolerated some ambiguity to comply with these two meanings, and only after his death they were unleashed and apart from each other. Because self-psychologist advocates put pressure on their adaptive function, this concept tends to be replaced by "self", "me" or "subject". In general, the word self is very consistent with the purpose and stories of books. This word is a motor that carries this book. This is also a teaching of what readers get. "Self" is the best vocabulary for all barbarians who now pass and are prohibited from participating in equal life. It is called "unexplainable word" and it becomes an atonement word. The ego is related to the book "Anthem" as it is the subject and lesson learned by our readers. "Because it is its nucleus, meaning and glory, the world never dies, sacred language: ego" The national anthem handles the primitive society of the future, where the prohibited word "myself" has been replaced by the word "we". The theme of the national anthem is about the meaning and glory of human beings. In this novel, Rand shows that the individualism necessary for building a complex technical civilization has been suppressed by collectivism. Land praises men's personal thinking power and evokes feelings. Emotions are displayed at different times throughout the story, and equality and freedom are encountered when two light bulbs are found, when they find a house that lives in the rest of their lives Ayn Rand explains Anthem's theme in various ways. Once, she said it was "the meaning of human self" - she said it as "word." In the letter from the reporter mentioned above, when talking about The Fountainhead, she said Anthem "is the same theme as The Fountainhead". Well, she expressed the theme of Fountainhead as "individualism and collectivism, not politics, human soul". Well, these are three very different representations of the Anthem theme, but as we continue to explore the

Below is a brief list of medieval philosophers I know, so it certainly is not exhaustive: St. Augustine (4th - 5th century) was a medieval border, but it was important to understand most of the medieval philosophy (because theology dominated this era). Augustine's confession is the work of metaphysics and Christian theology, which has a very great influence on philosophy (and not so much). Augustine himself is the leader of the entire monastic movement and today it has a strong religious influence. St. Anselm is another excellent Christian philosopher, although he is much later than Augustine (the 11th century). Anselm may be the best of its kind for an ontological argument of God (later quoted by the philosopher Descartes and Kant) This is a very influential argument that has received broad support and opposition is. Maimonides was probably the most influential Jewish philosopher and lived in the 12th century. His work includes an important explanation of the 613 Jewish commandments and an analysis of the concepts brought by monotheism. He also concentrated his creation on his philosophy and developed a theory with classical influence. His philosophy has a great influence on theology and metaphysics. Ibn Sinar (also known as Avicenna) was one of the most prominent Muslim philosophers of the Middle Ages and lived in the 12th century. It is difficult to point out a specific Islamic thinker who dominated this era, but Ibn Sina may be one of the more influential factors. Like other medieval philosophers, his extensive research often covers metaphysics, but from the Islamic point of view. Many of his philosophical pursuits have focused on a reconciliation between a reasonable philosophy and religion (a highly relevant question which was soon revealed during the Renaissance). His other influences include law and medicine. From the Carolinga era to the end of the Middle Ages it was one of the most popular and influential philosophical works read by politicians, poets, historians, philosophers and theologians. Through Poitius, much of the idea of ​​classical times was used by the medieval world of the West. People often say that Boethius is "the last Roman and the first scholar." The philosophical message of this book is very suitable for medieval religious beliefs. Instead of looking for secular goods such as money and power, encourage readers to seek virtue of internalization. Evil suffering is thought to be moral, but the evil aims to provide lessons to help change. As God dominates the universe through love, the application of prayers and love to God will bring true happiness. Guido of Arezzo is a medieval priest who may be regarded as one of the most influential people in the history of contemporary music. In the Middle Ages, the monastery was one of the most important institutions in Europe. Worshiping God is essential to the life of the medieval monks. One way of worship is to sing holy music. One of the problems the Guzz of Arezzo was trying to fix for these Carols was due to this contribution, he had a very big impact on the later music. The cathedral school began in the early medieval period of higher education, some of which ultimately evolved into a medieval university. In the middle of the Middle Ages, the Chartres cathedral operated the famous and influential Chartres Cathedral School. The medieval colleges of the West Christian world are successfully integrated in Western Europe and nurture various excellent scholars and natural philosophers, including Robert Grosseteste of Oxford University, an early interpreter of systematic scientific methods To do. . Experiment; and St. Albert, a pioneer of biological research at the University of Bologna in Italy, is considered the oldest university

After the collapse of the socialist camp, or possibly this caused Cuba to experience a serious economic crisis, academic literature on the island's economy flourished in recent years. Including Cuban scholars well trained in overseas published editing collections and publishing their own edited volumes by Cuban economists is a welcome addition to literature. With the announcement of details on this topic, it is becoming increasingly difficult for one author to compile all topics in a single volume, so that editing of expert team processes and dissemination of specific areas are becoming increasingly difficult. These trends are explained in the seven books discussed in this white paper. Almost all of these books focus on the economic restructuring and the impact of certain periods (1990-2004). The six books being reviewed are editorial compilations, four contain a useful exchange of opinions with Cuba economists, one book is published in Havana, only Cuban writers, one in the sugar industry It is involved. There are a total of 68 authors and 84 chapters. About 31% of the authors are Americans, 28% are Cubans, 23% are Canada, Europeans, Latin Americans, and 18% are Cuban American. Due to this extent and diversity and spatial constraints, painful decisions have been made. For example, non-economic entities of Azicri and Deal are ignored. As discussed by Domínguez et al. It is even more difficult to decide to ignore the social impact of crisis and economic restructuring on poverty, equality, personal consumption, social expenditure and service. Espina, Íñiguez, PérezVillanueva, Togores, García (see also ÁlvarezandMáttar 2004, see also Mesa-Lago 2005a) There are no conclusions in the five books; different authors contributed more than two chapters to editing; occasionally the same chapter appeared in various books in Spanish and English, expanded and updated. In this paper, we summarize these materials into seven themes and present my own different perspectives in the subject areas of (1) Cuban restructuring and globalization, (2) non-dollarization and centralization, and (3) domestic macroeconomic evolution introduce. (4) decline of sugar agriculture, (5) foreign sector and foreign investment, (6) tourism and remittance, (7) future economic reform Coupled with erroneous domestic economic policy from 1986 to 1990, the collapse of the Socialist camps caused the worst economic crisis of the revolution. It was the lowest point in 1993 (a US embargo occurred in 1996 when the worst part of the crisis occurred). Tight) is over and recovery is ongoing. The Soviet aid was terminated, with GDP decreasing by 35%, foreign trade down by 75% ($ 65 billion in 1960 - 1990, 60% of which was free and non-repayable price subsidies). The reform is euphemically called the special peace era, reform is still in progress. Reform mainly includes domestic and foreign policy: legalization of US dollar and overseas remittance; it was usually done in 1993 - 1996. Decentralization of economic decision-making, management of domestic and foreign trade, conversion to state-owned farm cooperatives (UBPC), resumption of free agriculture Leonardo Padula's "Havana Fanaticism" (2005) was set when the island became a long and difficult period as the Soviet subsidies to the Cuban economy disappeared in the special cynicism of Cuba. Wealth is measured by the distribution of eggs, and families sell whatever they support. Amidst this mystery, former detective Mario Kant became an antique book seller, and got a personal title of the former upper class and the library as a whole at a low price. Families living in a declining villa in Vedad, which once flourished, now harvest treasure for food payment. Padura found the roll, he bought a popular Bolero singer in Cuba, a beautiful and magical photo of Bioleta del Rio before the revolution. Conte wanted to know about her suicide and the mystery related to the family that owns the book. This breathtaking book is full

Oh, please bring me back to the University of Ontario. I curled up the grass in the shadow of the steep oak tree and tasted Shakespeare's sonnet. Cute and easy " Critical thinking: English major will continue to engage in literary criticism, reading literary works, and will reflect their importance in the form of academic papers. The difference between English and other fields is that the studied material is the starting point of discovery rather than the purpose itself. Memory is not important. The English major develops controversy and logical art. The original unexpected observation always wears fatigue, old reaction Technical matter: English major needs to study some courses such as literary criticism and literary theory. These courses provide students a solid foundation for literary interpreters. Let's consider Freud and Kant in large quantities. It will be very abstract, you definitely leave these lectures and feel that English is certainly disciplined. Most courses are lectures, led by professors. Students must participate in seminar form courses in the final year. We need to actively participate. Each student will hold a seminar that will serve as a professor and lead a discussion. Western Artillery: In English major, you need some compulsory or research courses to provide a movement that influences literary thought through the broad overview of literature and history. Here we will learn about different kinds. I started a compulsory introductory course at Homer Odyssey based on verbal traditions. Then, we continue reading the short story and read classic works including Joyce's "Arab". We read some poems and then read 'fiction'. Courses are usually divided into the following topics: "21st century British literature" or "Canadian literature". The order of taking courses is very flexible. The first year UK students can expect some frustrating trademarks. Professors in the UK do not have the patience on "five articles". Cliche! Please remove the word "very" from your thesis. Brief and clear. It is original. Workload: There are waves, but you can expect to have several novels at once. You tear them apart so please keep on! The lecture puts it all in context and trains you to think like a critic. Homework is usually an academic paper. Quality is higher than quantity. The purpose of this document is to create your own paper statements when answering questions and prove that paper through strict support of primary and secondary text. (the study). The exam is a question of the paper Application to 'real society': Is the English degree appropriate? Does English major in job hunting have a competitive advantage? Yes, the employer is looking for candidates with "ability of the 21st century" with emphasis on critical thinking and communication skills. I noticed that there are an increasing number of job seekers looking for "design thinking" skills. Formal English learning promotes design thinking to improve student's positive observation skills. If you can create meaningful written content in the "content king" era, you are the winner! Generally speaking, I like English and I like learning English and learning. I have been interested in English since I was young and started learning that. I have studied various English courses since I was young, but in other cases there are different courses. You know that I guess teaching methods in English classrooms is very important and very important. It plays an important role in student learning. The atmosphere of teachers and classes is also an important issue. For this course, it has become possible to argue that it likes it than the previous course for several reasons. In the first part of the course there is versatility, unlike other courses you participated before, there are no special steps. In the previous lesson, we usually had routines in the classroom. You can guess what you are doing at some point. In many countries, English was introduced as a course. In som

Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, who had lived at the age of 82, created more than 130 poems, plays, letters and science, and was recognized as one of the world's leading literary giants. His works include completely unique and different things such as fairy tales, psychological novels, political and historical novels, and even Faust. Goethe was born in the middle class family on August 28, 1749 shortly after the death of the Pope. Because she is the daughter of the mayor, his mother has many relationships. Abstract: In this article we will explore "subtle empiricism" proposed by Johann Wolfgang von Goethe. Goethe's scientific research provides another epistemology for traditional science. The author discusses the way that Goethe knows. Particular emphasis is placed on the process, form and participation of the epistemology expressed by Goethe. I introduced Goethe's scientific methodology and explored its application and its significance. Goethe's "Zalte Empirie" - his subtle empiricism - legalizes and organizes the role of imagination, intuition, and inspiration in science. It may make a significant contribution to the emerging participatory and holistic worldview and provide knowledge that is compatible with nature. In this article we will explore its methods and reasons. The first attempt to provide an alternative or complementary epistemological perspective to Descartes-Kant epistemology was proposed by poets, scientists and politicians John Wolfgang von Goethe. In the last article I introduced the familiarity with the texts of Goethe's seal and alchemy and the potential interests of his understanding of nature over the life of alchemy and interest in his work. The scientific method provides the first clear thing, as pointed out by Richard Tanas, whose epistemological views were later presented by Schiller, Schering, Hegel, Coleric, Emerson and others. .... Rudolph Steiner has developed in a new direction. Each of these thinkers have paid their own attention to the prospects of development, but they all share the same basic belief that human thought and the relationship of the world are eventually participatory rather than alternative is. "48 Writers, scholars, visual artists, amateur scientists, politicians, John Wolfgang von Goethe are talented people. "Young Witte" is not his most famous work - this distinction belongs to the drama "Faust" - a two part tragedy - but this work is a pioneer as his literary celebrity. After a terrible division, Goethe wrote his first novel with six weeks of writing. A few years ago, Goethe met a woman named Charlotte Buff and fell in love. She refused his progress, but married an art collector and a diplomat. In 1722, Goethe's philosopher and acquaintance Karl Jerusalem shot himself with a pistol borrowed from a female fiance who did not love him. Goethe combined these two different events to form the foundation of the "Young Walter" story.

Friedrich Nietzsche called Christianity as slave morality. Love calling for teaching your neighbors, promoting peace in the world, avoiding sinful religion may be condemned as preventing Nietzsche's desperate interpretation of sexual slavery. Many people will accuse Nietzsche as an evil madman whose ideals are consistent with the ideals of Nazi Germany. It is not right to think that Christianity is not a morality of a slave if Nietzsche's claim is considered incorrect. For Nietzsche, women are naturally second-rate men and have instincts that play a secondary role. They are identified with the morals of Christianity and their slaves, in other words, with the masses. A woman (slave) asks her husband and father (master) for guidance and recognition, and believes that their love can save something. Nietzsche believes that treating women equally will lead to the collapse of society. Considering the duration of his life, it is controversial whether Nietzsche hates women. In my opinion, women are rarely born in the ruling class and played a leaders role in the late nineteenth century. The morality of the master-slave is the central theme of Friedrich Nietzsche's work, especially the first article of "moral lineage". Nietzsche believes that there are two basic types of morality: "dominant morality" and "slave morality". Mastering the pride and power of moral value, slavery morality assesses goodness, compassion, and consideration. Unlike the morality of slavery, morality of ethics measures good or bad outcome behavior (ie classical virtue and vice, resultism) and the morality of slaves emphasizes the behavior of good malicious images (Example: Christian's virtue and vice, Kant morality) Master is the creator of morals; slaves use the morals of their slaves to respond to their morals. Unlike Master's morality (emotion), the morality of a slave is based on the revaluation of feelings, that is, the devaluation of master and slave. Because the moral of the master arises from the strong, the morality of the slave arises from weak. Since the morality of slavery is a response to oppression, it will destroy oppressors. The morality of slavery is the opposite of the master's morality. Therefore, it is characterized by pessimism and sneer. The emergence of slave morality go against the "good" of the master's moral values. Nietzsche believed that the morality of slavery is the source of nihilism beyond Europe. Modern Europe and Christianity are in a hypocritical state due to the tension between the master and the morals of slaves, these two values ​​are contradictory to each other, and they determine the value of most Europeans. Nietzsche in response to so-called morality appealed to special people who are no longer ashamed of their identity. He thinks that it is detrimental to the prosperity of the special population. However, he warned that morality itself is not bad, it is good for the public and should be left to them. On the other hand, special people should follow their own 'inherent law'. Nietzsche's favorite motto from Pinda is "to be yours".

Descartes believes that the existence of God is clear and obvious. God's thought exists to arise from his inner "perfectly clear and unique" concept (he acknowledges this as the existence of thought). Therefore, from various ideas, the concept of God is never regarded as false. From this very unique concept of God, there are things people clearly and clearly know. "Because existence can not be separated from God from the fact that God does not seem to exist, it actually exists." Discussion of Rene Descartes on the existence of God Rene Descartes's debate about the existence of God is related to his rationalistic deduction reasoning. Descartes concluded that the truth about the existence of God exists in His idea about the completeness of God and the essence of God (as a complete existence that must exist to be perfect). - All moral arguments about the existence of God are based on the principle that all of us share common sense of morality. Despite cultural differences, in a broad sense, people all over the world have ambiguous thoughts about right and wrong; a moral argument to the existence of God is that this mutual understanding is evidence of the existence of God I will say that. Immanuel Kant advocated this argument (not a moral argument); a god as a source of objective morality Second argument about the existence of God. Because Descartes believes the existence is perfect, it can become a predicate to God. First, I will explain what the ontological argument of the existence of God is. Next, I will explain why Descartes decided to incorporate God into his philosophical approach. As a predicate of God existence reveals some truth about God. Ontology seeks to prove the existence of God from a transcendental point of view RenéDescartes, often called the father of modern philosophy, has developed Anselm's assertion when trying to prove the existence of God in the meaning of the word "God". Ontological arguments are a priori arguments. The basis of these arguments depends on the understanding of the essence of the human god. The definition of Anselm's god is "an extremely perfect existence", which is the basis of his argument. God must be something that can not be considered absent: if you imagine a triangle, one of its main features is that it has three sides and three corners. These are triangle predicates. Descartes has expanded his point of view. This time I mentioned the attribute of God. If you imagine something perfect, it must be more perfect if it exists. Also, the most perfect ones have all attributes including existence. Therefore, Descartes believes that a very perfect existence has all the predicates.

Great theorists and philosophers of knowledge networks such as Stoic Sc ​​hool, Skeptics, Aristotle, St. Thomas Aquinas, Descartes, Spinoza, Locke, Hume, Berkeley, Kant, Burt. Lan Russell, Darwin, Freud, and all the science of the 20th century are all working hard on being a matter of knowledge. Do you have knowledge? "Knowing" and "knowledge" are powerful concepts Before receiving text and criticism, I think it is natural that I know what knowledge is. Then, I have a simple question. After reading "American scholars", I remembered that the class was asked "What is the relationship between nature and knowledge?" There is no answer. A consumer-centered knowledge network is a knowledge network that focuses on the knowledge consumers are interested in and controlled by consumers. There must be a very gray portion between all knowledge and consumer-centered knowledge, but knowledge-oriented processes, including consumer interests, are important. The Consumer Knowledge Network is a platform for consumer-centered knowledge-based applications. One of the ongoing discussions is knowledge gathering through knowledge mining (knowledge of mining) and clearly constructed knowledge. Specifically, we wait to convert to an explicit knowledge structure expressed as a semantic web, or automatically generate enough knowledge structures by text mining, data mining, and even knowledge mining ? Consumer-centric knowledge network - Consumer application vision for software agent technology - Implementation of consumer-centered knowledge-based computing The knowledge network is part of the semantic web and focuses on knowledge. A knowledge network is not just a collection of static coding knowledge. Always knowledge is constantly being created through active processes and services. Software agents play an important role in supporting the generation of knowledge networks and new knowledge. Knowledge networks are not just information repositories, they should be viewed as platforms for knowledge - based applications. Consumer-centric knowledge network - Consumer application vision for software agent technology - Implementation of consumer-centered knowledge-based computing Consumer networks are part of a network that focuses on consumer interests compared to consumer networks and consumer knowledge networks become part of the semantic web or knowledge network that focuses on consumer interests Let's see. The consumer web is driven by user navigation, but the consumer knowledge web is driven by the activities of software agents representing consumers. In order to emphasize the center of software agent technology in achieving vision, the assumed network should really be called a consumer / agent knowledge network. Not only is a software agent used for implementation, but each consumer is a consumer / agent knowledge Web as a partnership in which software agents working on behalf of consumers are essentially part of the minds of consumers It is necessary to conceptualize. Consumer-centric knowledge network - Consumer application vision for software agent technology - Implementation of consumer-centered knowledge-based computing

There are different kinds of miracles that exist in people who have reasons to believe them. Thomas Hume thinks that the miracle is not real. He said that all "miracles" have reasonable explanations behind them and rational methods to explain them. On the contrary, survivors of environments almost imaginable will regard their existence as a phenomenon or a miracle. On the other hand, there are philosophers who reasonably understand why miracles do not exist, but on the other hand survivors associate life and death with a certain miracle. David Hume's "miracle" in David Hume's paper? miracle,? Hume has advocated various arguments about why people should not trust any miracle. Hume does not believe that miracles do not exist, but do not believe it because there is no reasonable background. One of his arguments, by definition, miracle is incredible. And there is no reasonable way to believe in miracles. Another argument is that most miracles often come from non-civilized interpretation or define miracles; miracles are violations of natural laws that are unusual for most people. When Hume said: "Nothing is considered a miracle, if it happened in a common process of nature, then he will explain this very clearly. A man that looks healthy will suddenly die It is not a miracle. "Hume, p. 888) Hume said that this death is abnormal, but it seems to happen naturally. Miraculous memory David Hume's "fairness about human understanding" is obvious, and he believes that no miracles will occur. Hume is a logical person who believes in knowledge experience. Of course, such people do not witness them, it is difficult to believe in extraordinary ideas. Especially when these events require a lot of faith. In order for the incident to be regarded as a miracle, it must violate the laws of nature. But, that is the same legal chief. David Hume devoted himself to part of his philosophy and tried to ignore his wrong assertion about the soul. In Hume's doubt, the German idealist began with Emmanuel Kant and left various cognitive and metaphysical problems. David Hume is an Scottish empiricist and became a philosopher for his metaphysical skepticism and explanation of his mind. Hume was born in the 18th century Critical views of Hume's work in the 19th and 20th centuries often reflect the differences in the 18th century, but added a more detailed analysis of Hume's history and philosophical method. Thomas Jefferson declared, "If Hume is faithful, it will be the best historical fragment ever," and Hume said, "I held down the truth, lied, forged the authorities, forged the record" Added. Drich von Schlegel found a more admirable praise in Hume's words, but he also imposed on Hugh's party his own "narrow view of the principle and things is not entirely fair". Nonetheless, Hume's work - history and philosophy - has the first important biographer, John Hilbert, of their supporters Hume. Thomas H. Huxley also gave Hume a basic explanation with details of his philosophy.

Johann Wolfgang von Goetheyan Wolfgang von Goethe was born in Frankfurt, Germany on August 28, 1849 and died on Weimar in Germany on March 22, 1832. Goethe was only 82 years old when he died, lived in modern times. Goethe is a German poet, writer, scientist, theater director, critic and amateur artist. He is considered to be the greatest German literary in modern times. Goethe was born in a big house in Frankfurt, Germany. As Goethe grew, he received education at home. His father and his personal tutor gave him a course in all their common subjects, especially languages ​​at that time. Writers, scholars, visual artists, amateur scientists, politicians, John Wolfgang von Goethe are talented people. "Young Witte" is not his most famous work - this distinction belongs to the drama "Faust" - a two part tragedy - but this work is a pioneer as his literary celebrity. After a terrible division, Goethe wrote his first novel with six weeks of writing. A few years ago, Goethe met a woman named Charlotte Buff and fell in love. She refused his progress, but married an art collector and a diplomat. In 1722, Goethe's philosopher and acquaintance Karl Jerusalem shot himself with a pistol borrowed from a female fiance who did not love him. Goethe combined these two different events to form the foundation of the "Young Walter" story. Abstract: In this article we will explore "subtle empiricism" proposed by Johann Wolfgang von Goethe. Goethe's scientific research provides another epistemology for traditional science. The author discusses the way that Goethe knows. Particular emphasis is placed on the process, form and participation of the epistemology expressed by Goethe. I introduced Goethe's scientific methodology and explored its application and its significance. Goethe's "Zalte Empirie" - his subtle empiricism - legalizes and organizes the role of imagination, intuition, and inspiration in science. It may make a significant contribution to the emerging participatory and holistic worldview and provide knowledge that is compatible with nature. In this article we will explore its methods and reasons. The first attempt to provide an alternative or complementary epistemological perspective to Descartes-Kant epistemology was proposed by poets, scientists and politicians John Wolfgang von Goethe. In the last article I introduced the familiarity with the texts of Goethe's seal and alchemy and the potential interests of his understanding of nature over the life of alchemy and interest in his work. The scientific method provides the first clear thing, as pointed out by Richard Tanas, whose epistemological views were later presented by Schiller, Schering, Hegel, Coleric, Emerson and others. .... Rudolph Steiner has developed in a new direction. Each of these thinkers have paid their own attention to the prospects of development, but they all share the same basic belief that human thought and the relationship of the world are eventually participatory rather than alternative is. "48

When Dante was overwhelmed, Virgil told him, "Get up, I do not have time to get bored!" My cry cried. "The sleeping man will never wake his fame and his wish ..." (lines 46-48) Through this, Virgil must stick to it in any case indirectly I am telling you. Dante can not end his journey; he must cross the rest of hell so that he can keep on pursing and in the end can enter the light of God. Dante Alighieri, 10 new questions about "the greatest poet". 1) Do you know Dante Alighieri and his Divine Comedy? 2) Do you know that he was sentenced as a permanent asylator in Florence and died in Ravenna? 3) Do you know that he wrote Divine Comedy in Romagna, did he spend his time from Apennin to the Adriatic Sea during exile? 4) Do you know the story of Dante's Inferno's Kant V and two lovers Paolo Malatesta and Francesca da Polanta (called Rimini)? 5) What do you know about their affair? Dante Alighieri's hell analysis Dante Alighieri 's Divine Comet is considered the first great poetry in Italy, probably the greatest poetry in medieval Europe. This poem is very famous, one of the small figures, the great leader Kappanez has his name on Jupiter's moon Io's place (blue, 1). In addition, the poem is divided into three brochures, "Inferno", "Purgatorio", and Dantes Inferno In The Innono, and the punishment of many sinners of Dante is suspected of the crime they committed. Like Dante, they feel very pathetic for many sinners in hell at all levels. Many of their revenge seems to be too strict for seemingly bad crimes. Francesca and Paul Di Rimini could not control the love that developed between them, but they were forced to spend eternity on the second lap of hell. Divine Dandy Alteieri's "Divine Comedy" is said to be the greatest epic in history. The first part of the three parts told the story at the beginning of the pilgrim Dante's character: hell. Inferno explained about the journey to Dante's hell, and the pain he encountered in the middle and many magical creatures. During his trip, Dante showed various emotions and behaviors, but the feelings that put together the whole poem is fear.

Criticism of the death penalty In this philosophical study of applied ethics, the concept of punishment is shown using philosophers such as Mill, Bentham, Kant. "Guests from Hell" of John Martin Scripps will be used. The concept of the death penalty as a form of punishment raises questions such as "whether the crime is terrible enough to allow the killing of the country". Does someone have to die for his or her crime? Whether the implementation indicates that society has lost responsibility to all citizens. The strongest argument against the use of the death penalty is that the death penalty is a cruel and rare punishment. The eighth amendment of the US Constitution condemns cruel and unusual punishment against protesting the death penalty. When the Constitution was drafted, the death penalty was widely held in this country, but it was wrong, cruel and abnormal. Many authors of the Constitution support the death penalty as the philosophers underlying the Constitution are. John Locke said even that homicide is not inherently wrong. Currently, the role of criminal law by prove to everyone that the greatest concern for homicide is to prevent murder. Because the death penalty is humanitarian and inhuman, it is morally wrong. The way to enforce the death penalty may involve physical torture. Even if you punish a criminal, this is definitely a cruel and inhuman act. Capital punishment "Maintain social security and provide something suitable for murderer - Death Penalty" In this article I think that we can think of two aspects of pros and cons for the death penalty. Advantages and disadvantages are considered together with Christian doctrines and beliefs. Christian doctrine, Old Testament, New Testament also compare human reactions to this subject. From my research and analysis ... the unconstitutional death to the death penalty is one of the top controversial topics in the country today. More than 13,000 people have been executed legally since the colonial era. Most of these executions occurred in the early 20th century. In the 1930s, 150 people were executed lawfully every year. However, as the anger of the world appeared, the number of executions began to decline. In 1996, 37 states including New Jersey

Dante made hell in the hell of Dante who painted the hell that Dante believed. For many readers, the hell of Dante is strange, but in some cases the text is actually relevant to today's society. In other cases, the times have changed, so the correlation between Dante's hell and today's society has declined. Eating big is one of the most permanent problems today. In Dante's hell, people accused of crime are constantly unloading feces to punish what they are doing. Today, if a person is overweight, society regards it as disgusting and disgusting, and a person who is overweight is considered a gluttonous person. There is no doubt that many of these people live today with Dante's hell. They are shunned by society, laughing and laughing. Not only are they ridiculed and disliked from society, they will despise and hate even if they do not appear every day. Just as in the era of Dante, in today's society, overeating is considered not ethical to others. In our era, desire is not corruption like the Dante era. Most of the community does not believe that having sex with one or more partners is immoral, but many people can not find happiness, they satisfy their desires and that this is insufficient You may feel it. They move from one relationship to another and always look for who knows what. In Dante's generation, desire is seen as dishonesty and all the values ​​of time. Even today, many people believe this, but the value of sexual relations with other people has declined sharply since the Dante era. According to ethical standards of humans, people's recognition of sodomies may be different. Today's homosexuality problem can be a big controversy. Some people think that homosexuality is not a crime, and homosexuals are persecuted and guilty Some people believe this In Inferno of Alighieri Dante, various people were in hell, but Dante thought they were doing something wrong. Because their previous life is sinful, he assigned them to various parts of hell. If Dante is alive today and amends Inferno, he is a boyfriend from Superman, Brian Griffin from "Family Guy", Zerxcess from "300", Scars from "Lion King", Ikaew eyewear from "Spongebob" And its past committed crime - In the medieval text, Dante's hell gives the reader a deep understanding of the hell version of poetic explanation filled with punishment and evil. Dante speaks in various shades of purgatory and conversation with guides to gain insight about human foolishness. Each Kant explains a specific role and reason why it is trapped in hell. Dante made hell in the hell of Dante who painted the hell that Dante believed. For many readers, the hell of Dante is strange, but in some cases the text is actually relevant to today's society. In other cases, the times have changed, so the correlation between Dante's hell and today's society has declined. Eating big is one of the most permanent problems today. In Dante's hell, people accused of crime are constantly unloading feces to punish what they are doing. Today, if a person is overweight, society regards it as disgusting and disgusting, and a person who is overweight is considered a gluttonous person. There is no doubt that many of these people live today with Dante's hell. They are shunned by society, laughing and laughing. Not only are they ridiculed and disliked from society, they will despise and hate even if they do not appear every day. Dante Inferno Professor Ellen Dukes Reynolds December 4, 2015 Inferno of Inferno in Dante, or a book commonly referred to as Dante's hell, is very common in today's society, entertainment and intellectuals for readers It contains many problems that are provocative. This book shows that Dante's life is as strange and different as it is explained, and there is not much difference in the lives of many people today. In a bigger story by Dante Alighieri by Dante Alighieri, Dante lost the dark forest and took an expedition when he met Virgil Inferno on the road. The whole story consists

Dante's Inferno's Canto V Dante's Inferno was part of The Divine Comedy and Canto V introduced Hell's torture on the second lap. Here, Minos tells mind that they will wrap their tails around themselves. The second lap of hell had desire; people who committed a crime. They were punished by infinite storms in the dark, and the storms hit them. Hell is not only a geographical place but also a representative of the possibility of evil and evil of all human souls. When Dante traveled hell, he saw sinners increasingly disgusting. For Dante, each situation is a high quality image of every soul who decided to commit a crime. Others include Cleopatra, Achilles, Semira, each with their own love and desire stories. Dante is very poor for people "torn by love from human life" (69). In the case of Virgil's permission, Dante asked, "The two men are crushed gently in the wind, but still sad" (p. 74). The woman answers him and recognizes that he is the living soul. Dante knew she was Francesca, and she told him how love precluded her. She is reading an article about king Arthur's legendary Lancelot, man, Paolo, "How Love Masters Him" ​​(page 129). These two had a special romantic moment in the story and could not resist the exchange of kisses, on that day they were killed. Dante is very poor, he fainted Paul and Francesca express and symbolize sinful love through a role model. They inherently show noble emotions, if they violate God's law, they will basically take the two excellent people into curse and mental destruction. Personal reaction to Dante's overwhelming sympathy should not let us ignore the justice of punishment. Dante described himself as fainting at the end of Francesca's recital, and his aim was to describe the charm of part of the sin. Dante allows lovers to fight in hell, but they lose God and therefore erode their personality; they are hard to be considered happy. In a sense, they have what they want; they continue to be in a lawless state. Dante's Inferno Kant V's Francesca's Dante's Inferno style is frank, beginning and end. The terrible image that Minos "repents" and kills the mean sinner with eternal punishment is in stark contrast to the images of nearly families of Franciska and Dante who are admitting guilty. In fact, in hell, the confession seems to be defective or insufficient. - Dante Alighieri's Cant 18 Marcel Proust of Inferno says: "We have no wisdom, we have to discover it by ourselves, after traveling the wilderness, "The journey to explore wisdom through wild is exactly what Dante Alighieri was Inferno Inferno is the first part of a trilogy called epic, God Comedy Dante's Inferno's Canto V Dante's Inferno was part of The Divine Comedy and Canto V introduced Hell's torture on the second lap. Here, Minos minds that they will wrap their tails around themselves. The second lap of hell had desire; people who committed a crime. They were punished by infinite storms in the dark, and the storms hit them. - Literature uses language and language to convey ideas and ideas. Literature is important because it connects to each other and helps keep the connection by focusing on permanent and universal themes and interests. Furthermore, through literary works such as national anthems, regardless of race, ethnicity, socio-economic status, it is important because all social citizens are unified. Relationship between Dante and Virgil in Dante 's Inferno' s Canto XIV At Canto XIV of Dante 's Inferno, Virgil explained the statue of an old man on Crete. Dante uses Crete 's old man as a metaphor of Virgil' s heritage to reveal the essence of the relationship between Dante and Virgil. At the beginning of this metaphor, Dante explained in detail the magnificence of the Greek empire and Roman civilization and explained it in a systematic manner. - In Dante's hell, Dante was taken to a trip to hell. During this trip, the Danish people saw various forms of sin with their own confrontation and anti-pain. Each of these punis

"We change death into resurrection of life, turning hatred into revenge for forgiveness and demanding peace of war Yes, Christ is our peace Through Him, we are We pray for peace throughout the world. " In the speech of World Peace Day in 1972, he wrote that Pope Paul VI talked very famously, "I hope for peace and work for justice". In a personnel affair that must be dominant, whenever it contradicts opposing thoughts and actions, it becomes more urgent. It biases aspirations, efforts, and hopes of human beings It is essence, that is the basis and goal of our activities, both individuals and groups. Looking back at the information of the previous world peace day In a letter to Defense Minister Matisse on April 10, 2018, Archbishop Timothy Borrio expressed concern about the indefinite detention of Guantanamo Bay. Archbishop Timothy Blorio expressed support for the worldwide vulnerability and violence reduction method in 2018 as a means of reducing the number of violent conflicts, deaths and forced evacuation, sends letters to Congress, beliefs and beliefs Increase was requested. Language for building group-based strategic partnership In a letter to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Bishop Oscar Kant passed a bill to renew military license for use in 2001 and said that when and where the US military should do, and should improve Stated. Use the director to combat the American enemy forces Bishop Oscar Kantu wrote to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee to support the implementation of the Erie-Wiesel Genocide and Atrocity Prevention Act of 2017 and the Conflict Management and Mitigation Program in 2017. Bishop Oscar Kantu, on May 6, 2016 in a letter to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee expressed support for the 2016 massacre and atrocities prevention law and urged the United States to increase its investment in conflict prevention. "The history of mankind is full of cycles of war and peace. In order to maintain peace, in order to avoid war and to recover after the war, the solution is indispensable for improving the living conditions of both parties There is no such solution.Social progress depends on a peaceful resolution of the crisis: "If you have a relationship with relatives Kay Lee, or if you know where he is, Please feel free to contact (415) 371-9786. Please contact him and I will contact him Mr. Nordeen For the sake of others, the lower share button to help us promote Please use: Other explanation: Approximate height: 5'4 ". Weight (in the photo): 130 pounds Origin: Hong Kong, and China Town in San Francisco. Humor: Dry About Friendship, War and San Francisco Chinatown: 4th Infantry Division, Mr. Kelly - Looking for a Chinatown Writer War and Peace: Tolstoy's Large Napoleon European novel title is out of tongue. It is not such "peace and war": reversal of habitual word order represents a victory of hope of experience - or a desire for poetry in a sad reality essay -. As a theme of poetry, war requires action, and the experience of peace is lacking, so war has a direct advantage over peace. War was the first theme to accelerate the magnificent poet. However, the author of "Iliad" knows that the Trojan hero Hector and Patlockus, and later the battle scene with Achilles is not so important unless there is a Hector bidding to Andre Roque. A gentle scene of a wife and his boy scared of his father's helmet "American history in peace and war", author: In the American history of David Riemann poetry, the leader of prose literature series The basic way to determine peace is that peace is the absence of war. But this is a very narrow view of peace. There is no first condition for peace in the war, but peace is no doubt simply not in the state without war. This is a kind of international relations, peace, cooperation and harmony, characterized by actual conditions, to ensure comprehensive and sustainable development of the people of the world. But because there is no war, one of the maj