Mill and Kant's Efforts to Solve an Ethical Dilemma

As we all live in society with norms and values, humans naturally recognize specific moral ideologies and apply them to our daily lives. Over the centuries philosophers have tried to develop a framework that can be measured based on these moral principles. In this article, John Stuart Mill's moral theory and Emmanuel Kant are trying to solve the moral dilemma. John Stuart Mill argues that his utilitarian hypothesis is to assert that a moral statement can not be proved scientifically or mathematically (West 23).

The history of philosophy shows the efforts of great thinkers to develop a reasonable foundation for ethical behavior from Aristotle to Emmanuel Kant, John Stuart Mill, John Dewey, Sydney Hook . They say that ethics can be autonomous and does not require a theological reason. These philosophers emphasize the need for self discipline and moderation in their desires. Plato believes that the soul of a tank consists of three horses - passion, ambition, and rationality - leadership - reasonable people under the control of wisdom are balanced and gentle aristocratic life I believe we can send you. Our goal is to bring out our creative possibilities to the fullest, including our ethical behavior. Men and women can achieve better lives without requiring divinity. If one does not believe in God, "Everything will happen" This is totally wrong.

The writing by John Stuart Mill and Emmanuel Kant shows a very different perspective on moral issues. Mill's idea is called Utilitarianism. In this ideology it is a fundamental belief that happiness is the greatest goal and action should be judged by the ability to provide maximum happiness to most people. The dentist Kant believes that this is not the result of action, but the behavior itself. He insists on reasonable moral rules

According to these two studies, the big difference between Mill and Kant is in the gradual change in morality. In Kant's scientific metaphysics, a person can still be regarded as a moral honesty though he is still selfish. Under Mill's utilitarianism, if a person is selfish, he can not be said to be morally correct. Because Muller's ethical theory requires humans to spread happiness to others. "Everyone has the privilege to be able to enjoy their life, when they give up they help to increase the amount of happiness of the world" (Mill ch II). Kant denies Utilitarian views, points out that there is a disagreement between desire and morality, and human rights thinking will evaluate cumulative utility. Kant believes that everything that exists has price or dignity. He added that one with a price can easily be replaced with a similarly valuable one, but one with dignity can never be replaced.