Knowledge is both Rational and Empirical

What is rationality: Reason of virtue means to recognize and accept reason as the only source of knowledge, the only worthwhile judgment, and the only action guidelines. ... This means that all people's beliefs, values, goals, desires and behaviors must be based on the commitment of the thinking process, selection and validation principles. What is experience: empirical knowledge is knowledge about facts that people may encounter in their experience. These are always special and can be of many kinds, including the need for extensive training or some equipment to experience them. In addition, much of the empirical knowledge is actually conveyed through teaching from the authorities, but it may be fairly reliable and true. Experience is often a bit vague. Therefore, since one may have been in the UK, I think I have knowledge of British experience, but even if it is so empirical, what the word "British" represents is personal It is a little too much for experience. And people. The way to decide if someone has some empirical knowledge is to test it in some way by using logic, or by referring to other knowledge that you think is possible. Method experiments can be as easy as finding words in a dictionary, or it can be as complicated as using a cyclotron or PET scanner. Why knowledge is rational and empirical: Kant's theory fills the gap between empiricism and rationalism and reveals that they can be understood as equilibrium, so historically and philosophically very important . Components In other words, our knowledge comes from empirical encounters and rational manipulation, and we can prove that pure experience and purely rational way can not achieve knowledge achievement. Instead, he believes that human understanding of its own nature allows experience and can be used for reasoning. Kant's theory not only provides a theoretical explanation of how modern results such as pure mathematics and natural sciences are possible but also the interaction between experience itself and understanding is based on its origin and boundary Push the philosophy forward in the direction that is important to find. It's a place. Human knowledge

Finally, we believe that knowledge is reasonable and empirical. Immanuel Kant was a German philosopher who decided to combine these two ideas. Descartes believes that certain knowledge is "a priori" and irrelevant to experience. The other side of the idea is "ex posteriori" empirical knowledge. Transcendental knowledge is always correct, and ex post knowledge is comprehensive. Kant believes in the third type called synthetic a priori. This type is necessary and there are empirical elements

The concept of prior knowledge is based on intuitive or rational insight. Laurence BonJour said in his article "The structure of empirical knowledge" that "reasonable insight" to "see" direct, non-speculative understanding, understanding, or proposal must be true I said. Thanks to your explanation, at least I can try my work. I can try my own work. Guidelines absolutely helpful when I start a trip to my doctoral program

Knowledge can be received by two sources called empiricism and rationalism. Whether knowledge is empirical or rational, knowledge - derived philosophy is constantly being debated. "In the philosophy of science, empiricism is a knowledge theory emphasizing aspects of scientific knowledge closely related to experience, especially through intentional experimental arrangements" (empiricism). Empiricism is that knowledge can be gained through sensation and knowledge can not be understood without feeling. The rationale is quite different from empirical evidence. It assumes that reason is the source of knowledge. In the opinion of philosophers who support rationalism theory, acquisition of knowledge has three types of knowledge. The first one is to have innate knowledge. They strongly say that innate knowledge is completely different from perceived knowledge. This is true, it can not do anything else