Good and evil at school: Bullying and moral evaluation in early adolescence

We examined how teenagers (the sixth grade, N = 357) to evaluate virtual bullying and defend the hero, and these evaluations are conducted morally with their companions about nomination Whether it is bullying or not. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) leads to four factors to evaluate hypothetical bullying: five factors besides demons, contempt, timid and corruption, to evaluate the assumed DF: universal adore, courage Cool, sympathy, care, and justice. A corresponding scale is constructed. The results show that bullying and cowardly use show that the bullying of assumption of positive correlation, assumption of victims and ordinary admiration, empathy, care and justice evaluation evaluate positive correlation on the defensive side. Assuming that the moral assessment of the performance scale (bullying, victims, defenders and participants) bullying of the MANOVA group 2 evaluation scale at the show, the moral evaluation of the fictional defender is not important Influence important

Good (and evil) refers to the evaluation of moral objective to evaluate human behavior in a binary context, one of which is morally positive and the other is moral denial. The good thing is it - the times are seen as respect for life, continuity, happiness or human prosperity, evil is blessed to support their opponents. For alienation Kant, alienation is the opposite of autonomy. A self-determined person is a self-determination person and the will of a heterosexual person is determined by something other than a person like an excited feeling. In etymology, alienation can go back to Greek "other" and "law". €

We examined how teenagers (the sixth grade, N = 357) to evaluate virtual bullying and defend the hero, and these evaluations are conducted morally with their companions about nomination Whether it is bullying or not. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) Lead to Four Factors to Evaluate Hypothesized Bullying: Evaluate the DF of "evil spirit", "contempt", "timid" and "degeneracy" and the assumptions of 5 factors: " Universal dream, "courage" "cool" "sympathy care" and "justice". The result is the use of "bullshit" bullying assessment with bullying Assuming positive correlation assumptions and victims and "universal praise", "virtual defender's evaluation from the perspective of mobile emotional care and fairness and justice is positive There is a correlation.