David Hume's Argument on Passion and Morality

I am sorry for incestuous incestuousness with humans, not dogs. Whatever a person kills a deer, whatever it is, if he kills another person, that is wrong. Why are these lines being drawn between humans and animals? David Hume has answers to these questions. Many philosophers like St. Augustine believe that humans are morally different from animals because they can infer that Hume believes that it is passion and emotion that determines morality I will. In his book "Theory of Human Nature" he says that sin and virtue is not the fact we observed, but from the happiness and pain that felt in response to behavior (Hume, 218) .

According to David Hume, the wisest of these philosophers, Reason is only a slave of passion and "Hume Creatures" has a completely unconscious moral sense of thinking. After moral judgment, rationality continues, it is too late to be too late. Hume claims that we derive moral sentiments from "direct emotions and better internal consciousness" rather than "assertive and inductive linkage". However, although moral philosophers are not happy, they climb to Emmanuel Kant, who brings the torch to Plato by trying to derive the objective basis of morality. Kant argues that moral requirements are based on objective criteria of reason. He took even important names and called the moral foundation "absolute order". Unethical behavior is irrational as it violates sacred CI. Kant believes that ethical behavior means starting with responsibility

When comparing David Hume and Emanuel Kant, David Hume and Emanuel Kant can make a big progress with each other theorists, suggest morals that do not need higher existence and God, and can recognize him. Moral responsibility Hume and Kant share some basic principles, but they have different views on morality. By comparing different opinions of human will to determine moral value and the maxims established by David Hume and Immanuel Kant, I discovered that there are several moral theories.

Kant believes that moral argument is effective, but the last few centuries of philosophy saw a powerful question about the existence of God which is the theory of Immanuel Kant, David Hume and Anthonyfulle. The house made. As Alvin Plantinga states, the answer by this writer is whether faith is "the right foundation" or the evidence-based position is taken like Richard Swinburne. Some experts believe that only some discussion about the existence of God is persuasive, but believe that faith requires risk rather than product of reason. They say that there is no danger if the argument about the existence of God is as strong as the law of logic, they say that Pascal 's position is "reason why in mind".