International Relation Theories of Realism and Liberalism

Realism is an international theory that expresses interest in international politics. The fundamental reason for understanding realism is that many realists have retrospective exhibitions at civil war scholars. Realists are most interested in exploring and understanding more about realism. War problems In addition, realism leads the American leaders to think more about the benefits of achieving peace. Many facts of realists are to increase the interests of the state. I believe the state is the basic role of international politics.

Mainstream international relations theories are "realism" and "freedom institutionism". Realists believe that the state is in a disorder of world politics and that each country pays attention to their national interests. The concept known as "security dilemma" arises from the view that all countries are potential enemies and strengthening the security of a country leads to a relative loss of security in all other countries I will. Realists measure power based on material capabilities such as military expenses and natural resources. Realism believes that peace can last only through equilibrium of power between several countries, not the world of bipolar hegemony. Kenneth Waltz best summarizes the basic elements of realism.

Although the degree is varied, mainstream international relations theory including realism, liberalism, constructivism, has privileged hegemony and socialization in the construction of international order. The theory of non hegemian international order believes that the international order is not only a function of power and the preference of hegemon (or power). A non-hegemonic international order can be defined as a relatively stable model of interaction between groups of countries, without personal or collective hegemony of the great powers.

"British school" of international relations, also known as international society, liberal realism, rationalism or UK institutionalists, still has a "domestic society" at the international level despite the "disorderly" situation (Literally) lack of ruler or the world of the world) As Martin White did in the lectures of the London School of Economics in the 1950s, the extensive research of the British School was a reflection of the past international theoretical tradition Includes consideration. Hobbes (after Thomas) Hobbes), 2) Rationalists (or after Grotten, Hugo Grotius) 3) Revolutionists (or Kant, after Emanuel Kant). Roughly speaking, the UK school itself supports rationalist or Groatian traditions and is seeking an intermediate route (or through the media) between realistic "power politics" and revolutionary "utopianism" I will.