Behind Mackie's Argument For Atheism

In his essay "Evil and Almighty", McGee has built a view on the possibility of the existence of God with the characteristics of Lord religion, namely Christianity, Islam and Judaism. These features include that God is omnipotent, that you can stop evil with omnipotent tenderness, want to destroy evil, or be completely kind. Mackie systematically completed his logical response to the logical thinking process and to all possible types of criticism and alternative solutions.

Summary: As you all know, J. L. Mackie is famous for having no objective value. I would like to investigate Mackie's explanation of what objective value really is, then consider his argument against those subjects and try to understand one of them. Specifically, I would like to see if his argument applies to Kant's objective value. Therefore, this conversation is both Kant's explanation and McKee's explanation (at least when I understood them). McKee believes that objective value (if any) has a strange causal relationship. Specifically, these entities have the ability to make them conscious of their motivation (whatever their meaning, they follow their recommendations). Does Kant believe that objectively valuable entities have such power? Is this power strange in metaphysics?

J. L. Mackie defends moral skepticism in three specific arguments. His initial argument came from cultural relativism. McGee saw the problem that what we call objective moral belief seems not to form our culture. Rather, our culture seems to form our specific moral beliefs like monogamous. Therefore, moral subjectivity is the most rational explanation of moral beliefs to imitate our culture. His second argument against moral realism is that there is something strange or counterintuitive in the description of objective moral fields someone might give. There are three differences in this discussion. First, there are metaphysical questions, or questions based on odd states claimed by realists. For McGee, the wonder of this field is arguments against it. Secondly, there is a relationship problem as it is not clear how this field relates to natural objects and human behavior.