Compare Mill and Kant’s Ethics

Kant's ethics may be most suitable for modern business. Kant said that correct behavior based on a series of ethical rules should be consistent with these rules and that some other kind of behavior is morally prohibited. He also suggested that people should "respect and use their own ways as a means, not just as a means of other purposes". On the contrary, Mill's morality only focuses on the majority of happiness rather than responsibility itself. Therefore, how can Kant 's "tough" system satisfy business needs rather than Moore's flexible business ethics?

The fundamental principles of John Mill's utilitarianism and Emanuel Kant's moral metaphysics suggest different views of the two philosophers about the field of moral philosophy. Compared to Kant 's metaphysical segmentation and its use in proof of validity and error, Mill' s utilitarianism is a more sophisticated ethical theory. Kant takes his confirmation of metaphysical survival as discipline of his moral philosophy. If the law has moral power it will be the foundation.

According to these two studies, the big difference between Mill and Kant is in the gradual change in morality. In Kant's scientific metaphysics, a person can still be regarded as a moral honesty though he is still selfish. Under Mill's utilitarianism, if a person is selfish, he can not be said to be morally correct. Because Muller's ethical theory requires humans to spread happiness to others. "Everyone has the privilege to be able to enjoy their life, when they give up they help to increase the amount of happiness of the world" (Mill ch II). Kant denies Utilitarian views, points out that there is a disagreement between desire and morality, and human rights thinking will evaluate cumulative utility. Kant believes that everything that exists has price or dignity. He added that one with a price can easily be replaced with something of similar value, but one with dignity can never be replaced.

SK understands ethics under the influence of Kant. Morality itself is universal, and the purpose of moral life style is to harmonize and resign individuals and specific individuals. Please compare this with the statements on the terms of Kant's ethical behavior. Use only maxims that can be universal laws. Since moral life is a settlement between individuals and universality, it is impossible to enter into a form of religious life from ethics. The existence of moral people is universal. SK analyzed the two forms of religious beliefs described below, but we are limited to considering the identity and belief of true religious life. Moral life is a kind of settlement. Faith life is life in public opinion