9 reasons why experiments on animals must stop

It is estimated worldwide that millions of animals are raised and killed each year from drugs to floor cleaners and creams.

The nine reasons why misuse, mishandling, and atrocity are using biological instruments as laboratory equipment on World Animal Day (April 24) are as follows.

In the UK, the use of rats in monkeys, dogs, rats and experiments is legal - although they are regulated

Since we differ from other species in terms of physiology, biochemistry, metabolism etc, it is difficult to obtain results from animal experiments and apply them reliably to humans.

Even if you judge your ideas in any way it is a mistake to make lonely lives in the laboratory cage and let them experiment with bad pain.

Animal experiments on cosmetics and cosmetics have been banned in the UK for a long time As of March 2013, the EU as a whole prohibited the sale of cosmetics tested for animal ingredients - a big step forward.

Unfortunately, in some countries such as China, all companies selling cosmetics need to pay for movable products.

This means that some companies that were not cruel for years have begun to test their animals to turn their ethical policy back into the favorable market.

Non-animal research methods such as human-based trace dosing, in vitro technology, human patient simulator, computer modeling, etc. can also be used

Rat - with the mouse, is the most commonly used animal in the experiment - it is a very intelligent and social animal

It lies between good science and bad science - between methods directly related to humans and methods not directly related to humans.

It is time to switch to test methods other than humanized, effective and contemporary animals that do not cause animal suffering and give hope for effective medical care.

Dr. Vernon Coleman has identified eight moral dilemmas to resolve when countering the value of animal experiments, why animal experiments must be stopped at the 1991 Animal Exhibition Exhibition. Firm response before and after. The book he also identified eight major medical / scientific arguments about animal experiments and provided a convincing and fully documented argument on objections. The jury believes that the biological systems of non-human and human animals are different. They react not only to the chemical being tested but also to common foods. It is a strong argument that these results can not be reasonably inferred from one to the other, and Hans Reusch 's important work in 1982 "Naked Empress" or Great Medical Fraud (Great Medical Fraud (Page 13)

Animal pain is a legitimate problem in the UK, but the world is full of problems, human problems must be done first! It sounds nice, but all animals asked me to wear animal fur and leather and stop eating meat. As a vegetarian wearing synthetic materials, I have no reason not to deal with human problems. But does the fact that we can choose to give up on meat for moral reasons point to a significant moral difference between animals and humans? As Kant pointed out, humans are the only moral animals and the only animal that can accept even the concept of "right". For those who can answer it, what's wrong with maintaining ethical considerations? Here, A.M.C. You can enter: moral status of mental retardation, crazy, infant and Alzheimer's patients