Beyond Good and Evil

With "Beyond Good and Evil", Nietzsche argues how he believes in democracy. The principle of democracy consists of people who believe in equality or democracy. These principles bring equality, restrict life to the universal truth, and Nietzsche does not agree at all. He believes that these principles make people a large group. In this cow herd, people follow each other and do not have the power, leading to the collapse of individual rights and instincts.

In addition to good and evil: "The problem at the beginning is not an open question, the fatal problem of truth value ultimately leads to the affirmation of truth and the complete affirmation of life and humanity - (Nicice's Mission, 24). When Berkowitz claimed that Nietzsche declared the denial of 'willingness to science' because Nietzsche made a "comfortable lie" (Nietzs sche: Ethics of ethicists, 238) (see preface, n.3) Berkowitz misunderstood BGE 24. Nietzsche did not criticize the will of the free spirit within this saying, but rather from a world in which such a situation is evident from a world of certain error-free "real world" or outlook It reminded me that I never escaped to no world.

https://the-eye.eu/public/concen.org/UChicagoPress.Ebook.Pack-2016-PHC/9780226259819.UChicago%20Press.Nietzsche%27s%20Enlightenment_%20The% 20Free-Spirit%20Free-Spirit%20Trilogy% 20of% 20the% 20Middle% 20Period.Paul% 20Franco.Oct% 2C2011.pdf

With "Beyond Good and Evil", Nietzsche argues that our moral has been defined and redefined many times, so it seems meaningless at first glance. Unlike Plato, Nietzsche accepts no form of power to produce a perfect image. However, we define "good" and "bad". When he said that "God is dead" he said he died as a result of enlightenment as a universal source of human morality. Because form and ideals must be objective, Plato's morality can only be used in a single world view. The need to state morality beyond good and evil is a rejection of Platonic's paradigm. Even now after more than 100 years of tracking down the problem, the Western society is still platonic and it is headed toward micro religion.

When we believe that I am better than good and evil, what do we truly believe. We believe that people are the means, not the purpose. According to Aristotle, Kant certainly will end everyone's life. But in order to transcend right and wrong, we must believe that all of what we do to others is their weakness. They are the means we control, enrich and give power. Perhaps you think you know this. What about you? Is not this what happened in the US? People have become a means. Purpose of "economic growth", "national security", and "shareholder value". So are they the end of 'making the United States great'? The end that can be handled - Clean - the way most people think it is appropriate