Comparing and Contrasting Nietzsche’s Preparatory Human Being and Kierkegaard’s Knight of Faith

Please relax a little over time. Enjoy paper lightness or surprisingly heavy feeling, ink refreshing, and type regularity. There are over 4 pages on this stack, there are answers to some questions and personal themes. Every philosophy is personal, but some philosophers deny it. Discussed here are philosophers who are not so stupid. The two primitive persistentists, Søren Kierkegaard and Friedrich Nietzsche, are dedicated human observers, but their conclusions are different and seem contradictory.

The first two philosophers considered the basis of existentialist movement are Søren Kierkegaard and Friedrich Nietzsche and it was not clear whether to support the existentialism of the 20th century. They focus on subjective human experience, not mathematical and scientific objective truth. Like Pascal, they are interested in using forwarding to apparently eliminate meaningless life and boring quiet struggle for people. Unlike Pascal, Kierkegaard and Nietzsche also consider the role of free choice, especially with regard to basic values ​​and beliefs, and how these choices change the nature and identity of the selector. Knight of Kierkegaard and Übermensch of Nietzsche define the essence of existence, so it is representative of people who show freedom.

Article: Post-Kant philosophers reached a definite conclusion about the meaning of human existence in the 19th century. Discussion between Friedrich Nietzsche and Soren Kierkegaard reveals disagreement. Nietzsche believes that in order to live a meaningful life in a world filled with change and confusion, people must force the reality to follow their own creativity. On the other hand, I believe that Kierkegaard can only make a meaningful life only after becoming a "knight of faith". Being alone while keeping your subjective values. With one god

In his view, Nietzsche denied the world of modern Christians. When people compare and oppose cultural Christianity and Biblical beliefs, it can be seen in Nietzsche that many people agree to the "collapse" of the Christian world. His contrast with Kirkegaard is evident at this point as Nietzsche did not continue to reintroduce Christianity into the Christian world like the Danish people. Like other existentialists, he cherishes freedom, abandons integration, and insists on self discipline. The power of the country depends on the ability to provide space and benefits to those who do not meet the requirements. There must be freedom to question the recognized value of Superman who succeeded only in self-discipline