John Rawls’s The Law of Peoples

From the beginning of the John Rawls People's Law the Orientalism of Edward Side (1978) caused a contradiction in colonial studies. Does Sed's theory suggest that global impacts and strategies have been demonstrated by culture and imperialism (1993)? Or Orientalism belongs only to the Middle East, especially the Middle East. Is there only one "other" in the work? Alternatively, there is a resistance pocket in the discourse of the Western Empire. But perhaps the most difficult problem involves a position on imperialism and global issues of colonization.

John Rawls is a remarkable example of this tradition. In the People's Law, Rawls extended his "justice" approach to global justice. His allegations justified us by showing that people representatives choose to pick it up as an imaginary place to prevent them from knowing which particular person they represent It is possible to do. This ignorant decision model is fair because it eliminates selfish prejudice. When Rawls applied this method in the context of domestic justice, the initial position of the party represented individual members of society, he considered supporting the redistributive, equitivistic liberal politics. In contrast, Rawls believes that when his approach applies to global justice, it fairly supports the traditional Kant 's international ethics: compliance with the duty of the Convention and strict restrictions on war. Take back. Rawls expressed this ideal as "realistic utopia."

John Rawls introduced the concept of human rights politics in his book "People's Law" (Rolls 1999). The basic idea is to determine what the human rights are and what they need by determining the main role that human rights fulfills in a particular political field. In the People's Law, this field is international relations (followed by the politics of the country). An attempt by Rawls to rectify international law and politics in today's international system will help Rawls explain how to focus on how human rights works in this system. Human rights in interpersonal relationship does not belong to this field