How Much Better is David Canter’s Model of Criminal Profiling Than That of Other Profilers

Is the US method better than Canters? According to Weber (2009, p. 42), the US method to explain criminals is based on an interview method to understand convicted successive killers how to explain their criminal behavior. Then, they use this information to look at the crime scene and see what type of crime was mentioned earlier. This criminal description style is related to the FBI's Behavior Science Unit (Webber 2009, p. 42). Sherlock Holmes and Holmes (citation from Webber 2009 in 2002, p. 42), the serial killer is a white man from 25 to 34 years old, smart and gorgeous and charismatic with a smart, "street smart", for the police I am interested to argue that I am working.

The investigative psychological approach to crime analysis was developed by David Canter and incorporates psychological concepts into the development of criminal profiles using inductive investigation techniques (Ainsworth, 1999). Survey psychology distinguishes criminals and offenders in an effective and reliable way, using empirical research, statistical analysis techniques and logical reasoning rather than a subjective process to establish the field of scientific psychology I hope to (Canter, 2004)

Prior to 1986, David Kant, professor of Applied Psychology at Surrey University in the UK, is the first criminal profile created by railway murderer John Duffy. As a result, the Chief Police Association (ACPO) decided to set up a special committee to discuss the results of the Tami case. In that case, Professor Canter formed the psychological characteristics of the murderer at 13 of the 17 points he created. This was welcomed as a breakthrough in the psychological understanding of criminal acts, and for the special committee, research projects led by Kanter were established to develop an appropriate criminal analysis framework. (Murder Casebook, 1991, p 2681)

Professor David Canter pointed out that there are some promising results in several areas of research in a paper on criminal profiling and criminal discrimination (2000). Thus, the described method is used in the process of building a system capable of supporting the decision process. The Radex model (2000) developed by Canter attempts to classify criminal acts by identifying the main theme of action, rather than simplifying the criminal to a specific type. Figure 1 shows a general model of radex applied to criminal acts. This focuses on behaviors that are considered typical for all offenders and shifts to more specific actions. Figure 2 is an attempt to distinguish the different nature of behavioral science in criminal behavior.