Analysis of Kant´s the Critique of Practical Reason

Every era has created its own hero. Until the time of Enstein until the time that the St. Empire, St. Thomas and Roger Bacon forever and with the modern creator - Edison created Aristotle, Hercules and Alexander the Great from the glorious day of ancient Greece, I created the ideal image of the best expression. Formally, Kant is an ideological opponent of a reasonable genius Newton that makes knowledge and thought exist at the level of God.

The key text of Spivak's literary analysis is Kant's critical judgment (1790), which is his third critique after criticizing pure reason (1781) and practical rational criticism (1788) . In Spikek's view, these three criticisms constitute a cultural self-expression of the ability to judge Western aesthetics. However, she discovered the slip is the third criticism, which shows that Kant needed to remove the blockade of "information informers" in order to integrate this western self. Spivak described this slip as "a moment when it can not be recognized, it is called a native information provider." To better understand this final statement, you need to know how Spivak uses the term "closed". As described in "Psychoanalysis of Language" (1974), she borrowed the term "boycott" from the meaning of psychoanalysis, Lacan. Rakan, as far as he concerns,

In the first criticism there is only a hint of the form taken by Kant's moral theory. The practical rationality of "basic metaphysics" (1785) and "critique of practical reasons" (1788) is completely new. Kant argues that he now found the highest principle of practical reasons he calls classification. (To put it more precisely, this principle is essential for those who have needs and trends like us and are completely indispensable for people who are not reasonable.) As we all know, Kant finds some of this principle Offer different expressions. The first of these is as follows: "Only the sayings that you can make it a universal rule at the same time" (4: 421). (For Kant 's different versions, we claim that Kant is equivalent, see Kant' s moral philosophy, §§ 5 - 9.

In order to broadly understand Kant's theory of freedom, I will list some arguments about Kant's reason and freedom of criticism for pure reasons, the foundation of moral metaphysics, and criticism for practical reasons. But before I do, I would like to mention some aspects of his view, but I will not discuss in these contexts. One is Kant (Will and Wilkure) (after at least the second critique), the difference in the functions of the two aspects or the will system (MM 6: 213-14, 226). Will is a legislative aspect and through will, a reasonable existence will give our own law; Kant recognizes will for purely practical reasons. It itself is neither free nor free. Willkür is the execution side or function of a will, it is considered a free side