St. Anselm's Ontological Argument

It is important to explain why the topic you are discussing is important, especially if there are other topics that you can research instead of the topics you are discussing. In this case, his ontological debate with St. Anselm is being discussed. There were other arguments about the existence of God before St. Anselm, and the first paragraph will explain why it is important to study this particular argument. Then the argument itself is given and discussed. As with most arguments in the philosophical field, ontological debates also contest.

But I found that the ontological argument of St. Anselm is the most compelling one of all these discussions I know well. After reading and understanding this discussion, it is like returning to where I started - ignorance. I have the same dissent as other philosophers who believe that this argument is in the circle. According to St. Anthony's view, perfection means that other bigger beings can not be imagined. Perfection means presence. Without perfect attributes, certain things will not be perfect.

Ontological arguments are transcendental arguments. These arguments try to prove the existence of God from the meaning of the word God. Anselm of Canterbury introduced an ontological argument to his work 'Proslogion'. The classic argument of Anselm is based on two principles, the most important of which are St. Anselm and Rene de Carte of the above Canterbury. If he does not exist, you can still think of a bigger existence (it is like you said that God does not exist besides this existence). Presence must be one of the attributes of God. Because by removing it it is still possible for you to understand the bigger god (the god that exists). The most common problem with this discussion is that it only seems to enumerate the existence of God's attributes and does not seem to indicate it. This argument seems to indicate that any fact you can imagine should be true.

St. Anselm proposed the first ontological argument and relied on God as the definition of the greatest complete existence. If this concept exists in the mind, God also exists in reality. Kant criticized the ontological argument and pointed out that the definition of any concept depends on a series of attributes or predicates, and that there is no such predicate. In his "critique of practical reason" he stated that "building a belief in God (and the immortality of the soul) as a rational, reasonable and practical rational hypothesis, that is what he calls I invested the majority. Moral assertion "