Culture in Theodor Adorno and Max Horkheimer’s Book Dialectic of Enlightenment

"The latter is less meaningful and more powerful in monopoly," Adorno thinks. The media blends the format of high and low culture, blurring the boundary between them. The cultural industry regards "masses" as the subject of passive influence calculation. Consumers believe that the media has adapted to their needs; in fact, the cultural industry has created this feeling to enhance its influence.

The cultural industry as a term was built by school Marxist Theodore Adorno and Max Horkheimer of Frankfurt. The original work was "Culture industry: enlightenment as a large-scale fraud", "dialectic dialectic" (1944), suggesting the creation and reproduction of all forms of popular culture including radio, television, and a part of movies. Standardized cultural products like other finished products from the factory, the sole purpose is philosophy and compromise, not capital production.

An article by Max Horkheimer and Theodor Adorno entitled Maxter's Dialectics (1947) is entitled "Juliet, or Enlightenment and Morality" and interprets Juliet 's ruthless and computational behavior as an explicit indication of Enlightenment philosophy. Likewise, psychoanalyst Jacques Lacan proposed in 1966 's article on "Kant Avic Saad" Saad' s ethics complemented by the absolute order first proposed by Emanuel Kant. But at least one philosopher refused Adorno and Hawk Heimer's claim that the moral skepticism of Sadr is actually consistent in nature, or that it reflects the Enlightenment

Foucault actually took up some of his views from the work of Froedo-Marxist by Frankfurt School of Marx · Jorgehemer and Theodore Adorno. Deep criticism of contradiction: Enlightenment is full of understanding. Moreover, through rule of tool rationality, it tends to be totalitarian like fascism in the 20th century. (It is surprising that this book does not have knowledge about Communism, for many liberal critics of the Enlightenment like Berlin it comes directly from the rationalism of philosophers.)