Kantian Morality

Kant 's moral theory seems to be the most viable in determining the role of a person in a moral situation. The basis of his theory may be the most noble, as it is morally correct to act morally. Even if it is ambiguous or rigid, his idea works easily and efficiently in most situations. There are a few exceptions, but by watching how the real situation is presented and how it is handled, the strength of these exceptions can be slightly reduced.

One of the main criticisms of Kant's moral theory is that it focuses on rational autonomy. Critics emphasize that Kant 's moral theory does not have a morally independent significance for those who do not have the ability to do rational autonomy. This suggests that in theory it suggests that all human concerns need to be incorporated into ethical considerations. For example, consider the following scenario. You have an immortal candy, two children in front of you want a candy. Both have the goal of wanting candy. It seems reasonable (they all want to enjoy candy). But even if you give it to child A, child B can not help you earn candy, which is your goal (or enjoy candy).

In existential Kant ethics, moral principles essentially lead to the intentional behavior of real people. Therefore, this is a hierarchical interpretation of the theory of the moral principle of ontological Kant that I am speaking, not only because in principle itself must be classified like this in principle, but also because of their intentional will It is also a psychological realization. Agents have the same base hierarchy. At the three levels of Kant's moral principles, the lower level or type of principle is based on all principles of higher level or type. In addition, the principles occurring at each level are logically semantic and are normatively equivalent to all other principles occurring at that level.

Rational human condition 4, Kant Ethics and the existence of human: study of moral philosophy - Section 2.3, a way to solve the moral dilemma problem

Based on Kant's ethical principles described in the first part of this article, the moral value of behavior does not depend on expected results, moral action comes from the right motives, which is "good". Will or 'duty to approve'. Kant believes that the morality of our behavior has nothing to do with the outcome, but it is related to our intent. To Kant, "It is related to our intent and reasons for action, all of these relate to the principle we depend on." Therefore, the rationality of the means can not be proven.