Marx and Engel’s View on History

Kant believes that the means for obtaining a complete reason is an intrinsic internal conflict of human nature. This conflict, known as male nonsocial social nature, is a concept of opposing men 's tendency to attract each other or eliminate each other. Men are working people because they can not develop their capabilities isolatedly. At the same time, they are also nonsocial as they also hope that everything is done according to their own wishes. Naturally, men need to enter society, but men enter the resistance that may harm society.

Marx's philosophy (not Marx - called dialectical materialism) certainly follows Hegel's claim that reality (and history) should be seen dialectically through conflicting opposing forces. This occasionally makes a satire expression: a thesis + opposition → a satire. Hegel believes that the direction of the history of mankind can be characterized by fragmentation into perfect and realistic movements (this is also a move towards increasing rationality). Occasionally, Hegel explained that this absolute progressive expansion involves progressive gradual growth, but sometimes it requires a discontinuous and revolutionary leap - the occasional mess of the current situation. Marx accepted this broad historical view, but Hegel is an idealist and Marx tried to rewrite the dialectic from the viewpoint of materialism.

Marx 's view of history is called historical materialism (which is being adapted with controversy as a dialectical materialism philosophy by Engels and Lenin). However, Hegel thinks in an idealistic way, puts the idea at the forefront, and Marx insists that the problem is overriding idea, trying to rewrite the dialectic dialect in materialistic terms. In the view of Hegel's 'spirit' as a place to rule history, Marx regarded it as unnecessary mysticalization and obscured its material behavior in shaping the reality of mankind and the world. He wrote that hegemism needs to place the movement of reality on its head and put it under his feet. He does not like mysterious words, but he used the Gothic language in some of his works. In the "Communist Party Declaration" he declared that "ghosts bothered Europe - ghosts of communism".

Today, it seems surprising that Marx and Engels were written the Communist Party Declaration when I was young. Marx is still under 30 years old, Engels is three years old already. However, this excellent document represents the turning point of history. It is as fresh and relevant as it is now when it first saw the light. In fact, the relevance is even bigger today. There is anecdotal that Marx recently acquired a large amount of heritage from his father (possessed by his uncle) and Marx used most of it to buy weapons for Belgian workers taking revolutionary action did. I do not know if this story is correct, but Belgian Ministry of Just believes it certainly. They used this as an excuse for arresting him.