Kant's and Aristotle's Ethics

Good things are good, but you have to do it for the right reason. Aristotle and Kant are two famous philosophers with different ethical theories. The theory of virtue and duty depends not only on laws and duties but also on internal matters. Morality comes from inner strength, personality, and how we bring life to the utmost. Aristol 384 - 322 b.c. e Aristotle conceptualizes one area of ​​philosophy, contributing to the theory of logic, metaphysics, ethics, political philosophy (p. 237).

Kant's moral ethics and Aristotle's virtue ethics can easily be distinguished by recognizing that Kant is interested in acting from the principle of responsibility and morality, or recognizing that people believe that morality is correct Philosophers believe widely. Although Aristotle's method completely lacks the special concept of this moral motivation, it is not good to argue that good people are morally obliged to act in the same way as the Kan Tians It is rational. In other words, there is no sense of responsibility in virtue ethics. For example, the new Aristotle (such as Hursthouse 2010) contests a common view while arguing that Aristotle's approach not only has a strong moral motivation, but also that good people can meet demand It was. . From the perspective of Kant's moral representative's duties

Aristotle, Emmanuel Kant, John Stuart Mill's Ethics The most eloquent interpretation of Aristotle's ethical theory is called Nicola Ethics in his notorious work. I will learn. Among them, one can learn his main concern. It is to prove that morals are mainly related to the concept of "purpose" (or purpose). Aristotle wants all human activities to achieve "purpose" or "good" that it pursues. G. "In medicine, this is health, strategic victory, house in architecture" (Nicomachean Ethics, 7)