Is a Murder Worth a Murder

In George Orwell's short story "A Hanging" Myanmar is about to get up. Those who commit a crime of anonymity are about to be punished by the final death sentences. This story details his short walk to the gallows, and he will face his death. Everyone in the prison camp knows what happens and everyone has a melancholic feeling. The sheriff demanded that death be done soon so that the day can proceed normally. When the young county magistrates saw a painful walk he realized that the prisoner was roaming in the puddle.

I will take his murder case as an example. Murder is a very immoral act against the human body. The body can be found in space and time. They are. There is no other way. There is no such murder in the abstract. Jesus believes that homicide in your heart is equal to true murder, but this is not an absolute crime. Theft is similar to destruction of property and property. These are behaviors directed to the "body" owned by the human body or individual. Therefore, in the case of a moral judgment about a specific human body, there is a strange situation that God's self identity exists in space-time. Kant did not explain this. In fact, I can not explain his problem. We pretend to think about these issues like 'cant', and pretend that there is a quick and quick distinction between facts and values, they are bound to have a boundary between them It can not be decided accurately.

The moral dilemma is like this. As a continuous killer is in front of you and asks where your child is, the murderer can kill them. Are you lying? While he was still alive, Kant himself was actually asked this question, and in his paper he answered questions about lying down from the motive of kindness. Basically, people should not tell a lie, but this does not prevent you from closing the door to a continuous murder case and after telling him where your child is in your house. It is an alarm. In his article Kant said that someone who uses a continuous killer as a means for you to accomplish the purpose rather than the murderer is over lying in this situation (and similar situation / in general) I will continue to argue.

Two serious problems occurred in the investigation of the serial murder case. First, the murderer and the victim are completely strangers. In the "typical" murder case, the murderer is familiar to the victim, but in most serial murder cases there is no previous association between the two, and the positioning of the murderer is complicated . The second question is that most serial killers seem to be normal; they have work, they are famous neighbors, and some even have families. Therefore, they are suspected of being very unlikely to commit a crime. For example, the serial killer Robert Yates, who was run in Washington in the 1990s, was a married father of five men who worked in the US Air Force who killed 13 prostitutes; "Green River Killer" Gary Ritchie got married Three times, including when he was arrested. He killed 10 victims in Kansas State