Anselm

Anselm Anselm was born in 1033 by aristocratic parents in Aosta, Italy. He and his mother always have a strong relationship, but his relationship with his father is very different. They will never succeed. Anselm wanted to be a priest since he was a young boy. As a child, he imagined that heaven would stay on the Jupiter Hill outside his home, which might help plow this dream. Anselm did not want to become a monk any longer after a short period later, but when he was fifteen he did not become a priest.

St. Anselm was born in Ostapiemonte in 1033. Anselm knew that he wanted to be a monk when he was very young. After Anselm's father forbade to follow his dream of becoming a monk, Anselm left the house in his early twenties. Anselm emigrated to France, where he became a monk in 1060. A few years later, Anselm became a precedent for Abbott. At 1093, A. A. Anselm was enshrined as an archbishop. The next few years was a tension and confusion between Anselm and the King about money and other issues ... St. Ansel brought problems to Rome where he was less helped than he thought. In the meantime, King William died and St. Anselm returned to England. The new king made great emphasis on St. Anthony and never denied his view or opinion on important issues. Nevertheless there are still problems like money that need to be solved by Rome. Even if there is a difference in a problem, St. Anthony and the King still have a good relationship.

An ontological argument was originally developed by Anselm of Canterbury, a clergy and philosopher of the 12th century. Philosophers and scholars have found several different clues to Anselm's work. The simplified version of Anselm's proof was very popular in modern times (17th - 18th century), which was used with a few examples by Descartes, Spinoza, and Leibniz. A simplified discussion is this: Kant provides two major arguments for this proof. His first critique was traditional criticism. And it was used by Aquinas and many other medieval philosophers. Kant's argument depends on the following assertions: whether it is always two separate problems, one thing. We can say what you like about the essence and essence of things. It is always a matter of asking whether there is something with this essence or essence.