19th and 20th Philosophy: The views of Emmanuel Kant

Kant's "critique of pure reason" indicates that there are multiple categories, and he uses logic to derive these conclusions. "It is also possible to intuitively synthesize only the unity of expressions that differ intuitively by the same function with different representation unity.This is often called purely understanding concept.Therefore, The logical form brings about the same behavior of the concept and also brings transcendental content to that expression through integration of diversity in a general intuition.

My own opinion is that the criticism of Kant of philosophical multiculturalism based on advertising is also caused by the old and deep tendency of the 19th century, the 20th century, the 21st century, that is anti - Cantanism, or simply anti - Canti is. I mean Kant and Kant's philosophy, and even prejudice against fear. Furthermore, in the American McCarthyism from the end of the Second World War and from the late 1940s to the 1950s, the mainstream British and American academic philosophy almost all German philosophy (except for early analysis philosophers like Eph) . Just as most of Europe's philosophy influenced by Marxist is a moral aura, members and colleagues of reggae, Wittgenstein, Carnap, and other Vienna circles are moral by Nazi style fascism aura Contaminated with related pollution, Russia, Stalinist communism

Since the 20th century, critics tended to think that Kant had a tense relationship with religion, which is not a general view of the 19th century. The letter from Karl Leonhardt's Line Hold made Kant the first known. She wrote: "I believe that I can deduce religion without reservation, in particular Christian interests are in full compliance with reasonable criticism, one of Kant's first comments, John Schulz, "Is this system itself fully integrated with Christian faith, the latter's deity and good deed are more obvious?" As Friedrich Nietzsche said this view through the 19th century , He said, "Kant's success is only the theologian's success." Spinosimism is widely believed to be the cause of the pantiesism controversy. Even atheism is a complicated pantheism

This article examines the latest trends in Kant scholarship on religious philosophy and these trends are in a general view of Kant as a philosopher who decisively holds metaphysical things, especially metaphysical metaphysics I claim to challenge. This view is often used to justify the anti-metaphysical grounds of most modern theology and religious philosophy; a discreet picture that Kant is now appearing is causing problems for this attraction.