What is Kant's Categorical Imperative?

The classification order was designed by Emmanuel Kant to provide a set of maxims (or motives) that must be passed to make the behavior moral obligations. When establishing a classification order, it is a moral obligation to enforce litigation under any circumstances. According to Kant, the main motivation of an individual should always be the obligation to carry out this action, because we can use our reasons to decipher our obligations. Logically, it must be part of a moral actor, since human inference ability is to interpret ours from animals. Rationality is objective and universal for humans, and is therefore a reliable and reasonable basis of moral theory.

Classification instructions are determined by referring to three recipes. The first expression, the law of nature, claims to act "only based on generalizable motto". This means that the principle must be able to be executed universally without inconsistency. If this is impossible, it can be logically assumed that behavior is immoral as it is contrary to reason. If governance is not universal, others can not adopt the same moral principle freely. The second formula (self-termination formula) guarantees that you do not take "others or yourself as a means by any means, always for purpose". The only way to use someone else for other purposes is to use their rationality. Finally, "the expression of the kingdom at the end of the year" is required to "act like a legislative member of the universal kingdom". It may not be possible to live in this world, but we must act like us. According to this formula, we must assume that everyone follows the rules you established through actions. If the intended action passes all expressions, this is absolutely necessary, so it is not only correct but also a moral obligation.

The moral system of Emmanuel Kant was built around the sorting order. Classification order is a universal and absolute ethical standard. These orders build moral ethics, or what Kant calls "moral order". According to him, they must be applied to all situations, every situation. The decision does not change according to the situation. The order of classification is an important feature of the Kant 's order and he believes that true morality depends only on the principle of guiding behavior, not depending on the final result. Kant thinks morality is absolute and proofable; the right thing can be determined by putting actions or maxims into the equation.

Kant is known for his theory, has a moral obligation, it is called "sorting order" and comes from the concept of responsibility. Kant defines the requirement of the moral law as "absolute order". Classification orders are essentially valid principles and they are effective on their own, and if our actions are to comply with moral law, they must be kept in all situations and circumstances not. Classification commands provide tests that can evaluate ethical descriptions. Kant pointed out that moral means and purposes can also be applied to absolute orders and can use appropriate "means" to pursue a "purpose" with reasonable existence Did. Order to make a hypothesis based on physical needs or the end of needs. Absolute orders can be based only on "their own end", ie the end is not a means of other needs, desires or purposes

The purpose of this reflection is to clarify Kant's instructional interpretation of absolute order and assumption and to criticize this ethical theory. Emmanuel Kant interprets the absolute order as an ethical act and needs to obey the motto "You can simultaneously make it a world-wide rule" (4: 421). Kant believes it is almost self explanatory, because it believes that action is morally permitted only if it becomes a law that everyone must comply. In understanding this concept, it is also important to understand Kant's meaning accurately through classification of terms and commands. Kant expresses the order as "the official of command" (4: 413), and all instructions are expressed as "should" or responsibility (4: 413). The most urgent task is order, purely the basis of empirical data that is the basis.

The purpose of this introspection is to clarify the absolute order. And submit some criticisms to this ethical theory