Democracy and Political Obligation

The public life of political public servants is characterized by other duties and obligations, not private life. There is also contradiction between human public duties and private obligations. The focus of this white paper is to test whether this difference in responsibility is regarded as the impact of various forms of obligation. You can talk about a particular form of political obligation in the same way Kant distinguishes moral and legal obligations.

Do you agree that the theoretical political obligation requires liberal democracy? At first glance, the answer seems to depend on a confirmed consent token. It is clear that if registration is approved by voting, society must be democratic in order to have political obligations to citizens. On the other hand, if consent is represented only by residence, freedom of rights and freedom - freedom of speech, democracy etc. - seems to be irrelevant to consent and political obligation issues.

Therefore, this article will first briefly introduce the issue of political obligation. Next, the second part looks at the conceptual problems posed by political obligations, including its implications for political obligations. The third part focuses on skepticism, paying special attention to anarchists who deny political obligations but do not want to abolish the state, which is called philosophy. In Part 4, we survey the main competitors in various political obligation theories currently being provided, summarize the thesis in Part 5, and briefly discuss the recent pluralism or "multi-principle" method proposal To do.

The immediate problem arising from this concept of political obligation is whether "politics" is a suitable transformationist. If the obligation is to comply with the law, why is not it called a legal obligation if other conditions remain the same? Or, Bhikhu Parekh (1993, p.240), our obligation to comply with the law is actually a matter of citizen's obligation, "respect and protect civic authorities' legal obligation" I do not conclude that there is. The obligation is "not a political obligation," follow the law enacted by the administration "? Parek believes that "politics" is a wider term and that those with real political obligations will bear her politics, not following their laws. Raz 2006, p. 1004) Such people have an active obligation to ensure safety and take measures to promote their own interests.