Conception of the Interaction Between Substance in Leibniz’s Monadology and Discourse on Metaphysics

An important aspect of Leibniz 's "monism" and "metaphysical discourse" is the concept of his simplicity and interaction. Leibniz gives the word monad to all simple substances. A monad is part of a creature "whether it is stretched, not shaped, whether it can not be separated" (M3). A monad can exist as a clear, necessary, limited, or infinite presence. For Leibniz, God is the only necessary and infinite monad, he is an endless and unique guardian of the only certain, independent and restricted monads in the universe, and they all depend on God . It exists (D 14).

In Physical Monography (1756), Kant tried to use "single" to provide a metaphysical description of the basic composition of matter. Leibniz and Wolff believe that the list is a simple atomic material constituting the substance. Kant rejected Leibniz 'remark that following Wolf, the list is spiritual and does not keep in touch with each other. A new aspect of Kant's assertion is that each list has some gravitational and repulsive forces and because these lists are compressed mutually by conflicting repulsive forces due to the interaction between these lists the order is determined To fill up the amount of space. Thirty years later, in Kant 's metaphysical foundation of natural science (1786), Kant will develop the theory that substances must be understood in terms of attractiveness and repulsion of interaction.

An important aspect of Leibniz 's "monism" and "metaphysical discourse" is the concept of his simplicity and interaction. Leibniz gives the word monad to all simple substances. A monad is part of a creature "whether it is stretched, not shaped, whether it can not be separated" (M3). A monad can exist as a clear, necessary, limited, or infinite presence. - The main feature I am missing is confidence. In my opinion, others are always smarter, more beautiful, motivated, and superior to me than I am. Because of this attitude, I usually do not express opinions, express my thoughts, or control something.

As Leibniz argues in Section 8 of metaphysical discourse, if a limited substance has a CIC, what is its ontological state? In other words, what kind of CIC can have such properties and such properties? Leibniz 's answer to this question emphasizes other entity paradigms, or unity. Having CIC is the essence of an individual substance, but only real true solidarity is qualified as a substance. Leibniz expressed his position with a letter to Arnauld in a very clear and powerful way. "In short, I emphasize this same proposition and insist only by becoming an axiom, it is not true that is not true" (G II 97 / AG 86) In the era of communication between metaphysics and Arnauld, Leibniz sought certain academic concepts, mainly the concept of physical form.