Dialogue important in learning to read and write

"Reading and writing skills in various subjects is very important for the choice of life in the future. What we need to learn that children deal with various kinds of texts is very unique education and dialogue at school is". He is a professor of educational science at the university 's new Blåsenhus campus and is in charge of research on reading and writing processes.

Learning to read and write is not a matter of simply "cracking code". It's about being able to use it to read and write many topics and backgrounds

"Even at a very young age it will lay the foundation for children's understanding and future participation.When adults enter texts with children, explain the contents in detail and explain," Caroline Liberg I say.

From an international perspective, Swedish families do a very good job of providing young children with an exciting family environment to develop handwritten languages. In the next step, children learn to read, write and understand the abstract principles of written letters. This is the focus of today's school.

"But as children acquire the basic skills of reading and writing new challenges arise, children will encounter lots of text, if not early, between 3rd and 4th graders. Because the information in the text is very dense, this might be a big shock, "Caroline Liberg said.

Students usually deal with themselves at this stage and face many sentences without the teacher's true support. Since the 1980s, the trend in education was to allow children to manage themselves.

"But dialogue and dialogue with others is very important to learning, there are different opinions depending on the content.The contrast effect is the foundation of all learning.The topic text also has different difficulties.For example, The text is well explained sex, other textbooks may be narrative, debate, etc, but students need to learn to meet all these textbooks in terms expressed in the learning requirements of each subject there is."

"At Uppsala University, we received funds to set up research laboratories to study texts in mathematics and science fields, and finance on how students handle these texts.Caroline Liberg Maintenance

COWEN: But does Plato like Socrates, too? As you read these conversations, Socrates seems to be full of public opinion. I tend to use Protagoras and Sophists more. You read a conversation like Meno. "Oh, learning has to be remembered." The argument you carefully learned about this conclusion seems stupid. COWEN: This is a philosopher's dislikes. But for our readers, what would it be like if I wanted to read all the conversations that you think would have and blame it for the bottom line of the bottom line? That is not the law, but the law of Socrates. What do you think?

It is noteworthy that Plato wrote "dialogue", Aristotle wrote the paper. When a person reads Plato's conversation like Aristotle's thesis, people will not understand the conversation. Reading Plato just as we read Aristotle is one of the fates that we met in an English speaking community. Previous generations of British and American thinkers have read Plato as if they are reading Aristotle's thesis. Augustine, Aristotle, the traditional language landscape seen by logical positivists, in our understanding of "metaphysics" of "subjectivity" (Descartes, Kant) as "rationality as a way of understanding" Discussed. Deep connection In this traditional figure, the symbol represents a thing (theme), but it is also a concept or image symbol (frame) in the speaker's mind. A conceptual or psychological image is the manifestation of the speaker's heart and brain.