Utilitarian and ontological variation in individualism-collectivism

This paper is based on the use of Utilitarian individualism - collectivism, personal personal interests of individuals or dimensions of differences in common interests of groups, and ontological individualism - collectivism, ie the superiority of individuals or groups as a basic society Distinguish dimension. Entity Utilitarian fluctuations have been studied in many studies on individualism - collectivism, but point out that the ontological changes are not drawing much attention from the research, and these two dimensions are the beliefs of the organization It may also affect behavior and behavior. Aftertissivist individualism - After pointing out that the collectivist dimension maps differences in self concept definitions, this paper describes the impact of these differences on organizational motivation and identity research.

In this article, in the context of New Zealand, in order to introduce individualism (collectivism) into four ethnic groups (New Zealand, Europe, New Zealand, Maori, Pacific Islands and China), individualism - collectivist interpersonal relationship I will use the evaluation. Discovery of differences at the individual level. Inventory (ICIAI) was developed by Matsumoto, Preston, Brown, and Kuppersbusch (1997). In this survey, we tested the reliability of the ICIAI tool for various ethnic groups and the influence of these ethnic groups on general values ​​and behaviors in three social situations (families, friends, and strangers) did. There were 400 participants (36% NZE, 20.8% Mori, 18.5% Chinese, 14.3% PI). In the context of New Zealand this scale is effective and reliable across cultures, and it helps to develop cross-cultural equivalents for individual differences.

This paper is based on the use of Utilitarian individualism - collectivism, personal personal interests of individuals or dimensions of differences in common interests of groups, and ontological individualism - collectivism, ie the superiority of individuals or groups as a basic society Distinguish dimension. Entity Utilitarian fluctuations have been studied in many studies on individualism - collectivism, but point out that the ontological changes are not drawing much attention from the research, and these two dimensions are the beliefs of the organization It may also affect behavior and behavior. Aftertissivist individualism - After pointing out that the collectivist dimension maps differences in self concept definitions, this paper describes the impact of these differences on organizational motivation and identity research.

The ancient Greek philosopher Xenophanes apparently appeared in the form of an ontological argument and appeared in works of Parmenides, Plato and Neo-Platonics, but the mainstream view is that its ontological debate is first I believe. It was expressed and developed by Ansem of Canterbury. . Some scholars believe that Islamic philosopher Ibn Sina developed a special ontological argument before Anselm, but other scholars expressed doubts about this position. Daniel Donbrowsky marks the three major stages of the development of the debate: the first explicit expression of Anselm; the criticism of Kant and Hume in the 18th century; and the theory of the proposition of the 20th century philosopher in Anselm The second ontological point