Descartes Fail Descartes first tried to provide an absolutely reasonable basis for empirical science in his contemplation about the first philosophy and then tried to prove the existence of God . I focus on the first meditation and the second meditation and in his question about the source of knowledge I try to prove that he did not follow the rules proposed in "methodology". First of all, I think that Descartes fails to distinguish pure emotions and reasoning, that constitutes what he calls emotions, and that the outcome of such failure does not obey his method I assert. In this article, I will explain the failure of logical discussion on the existence of Descartes and its nonlogical effects. Although all communication creates misunderstanding opportunities, Descartes' cogito creates a bigger problem as it represents an uncompressed idea, that is his consciousness. In other words, it is better for Descartel to arrange his cogito as follows. By saying this, Descartes will judge that thinking is not logically possible. With no subsequent phrase "for the reason" emphasizes that there is no validity of belief in consciousness or existence, except for the not expressible concept of "consciousness - existence". The "awareness of existence" followed by an asterisk after the square brackets indicates that the term represents a larger idea than literal interpretation. The sketch of this analysis was donated to Descartes' disciples who advocated the best way to understand consciousness. Obviously Descartes' project plays an important role in consciousness, but Descartes can not analyze this basic concept. Is there something about consciousness that makes it possible to play this central role? (See Alanen 2003, Broughton 2008, Hennig 2007, McRae 1972, Radner 1988, Rozemond 2006, Simmons 2012, Descartes for conscious topics and reflection on Descartes psychology, performance and transparency related topics For example, Mr. Hennig thinks Descartes actually does not use the word "recognition" in a new way, while Simmons thinks that resources are subtle to Descartes Explain and enable various psychological phenomena.)

Early in the 17th century, a philosopher called Descartes questioned his existence. His life was devoted to the establishment of philosophical and mathematical systems where all science is logical. Descartes was born in 1596 in Touraine, France. His education involved attending the Jesuit school La Fleche. He studied the curriculum of liberal arts that emphasized philosophy, humanities, mathematics, and mathematics. After that, I entered Poitiers University and I got a Bachelor of Law from 1616. Descartes skepticism - Descartes skepticism - Descartes skepticism - Descartes skepticism - Descartes skepticism - Descartes skepticism - Descartes skepticism - Descartes skeptical argument - Descartes skeptical argument - Descartes Skeptical argument - Descartes skeptical argument - Descartes skeptical argument - Descartes skeptical argument Descartes was skeptical at the first two mediation. Descartes first solves radical skepticism implied by an evil devilish argument by deciding that he is intellectual essence. According to Descartes, this "I" self-view is born, we are born, even a demon can not be doubted. In this article, I will study René Descartes' suspicion and reaction to Britain. Bouwsma and Norman Malcolm Bouwsma and Malcolm argued against criticism of certain parts of Descartes' claim, but I will prove that this is not enough to refute the whole. In order to understand Descartes' claim and its extreme view, at least a general understanding of the motive for discussion is necessary. The 17th century was an era of advancement of science, the prosperous scientific community was interested in establishing consistent standards to define what science is. Their science is based on a combination of experience and experience, and ideally there is no prejudice to contaminate the results. However, Descartes believes that the sensation is unreliable and science based only on sensory information is uncertain.

Descartes ignored everything he thought was true. He believes that if any belief is suspected, it is uncertain and can not be used as a basis. Descartes will refuse information, knowledge or truth based on my feeling. He applied, "Dream assertion" (19), he said, according to the senses themselves, there is no clear way to prove whether you are dreaming or awake. Therefore, sensual truths are unreliable and dubious. Descartes saw why and how his sense was deceived. Descartes skepticism - Descartes skepticism - Descartes skepticism - Descartes skepticism - Descartes skepticism - Descartes skepticism - Descartes skepticism - Descartes skeptical argument - Descartes skeptical argument - Descartes Skeptical argument - Descartes skeptical argument - Descartes skeptical argument - Descartes skeptical argument Descartes was skeptical at the first two mediation. Descartes first solves radical skepticism implied by an evil devilish argument by deciding that he is intellectual essence. According to Descartes, this "I" self-view is born, we are born, even a demon can not be doubted. In this article, I will study René Descartes' suspicion and reaction to Britain. Bouwsma and Norman Malcolm Bouwsma and Malcolm argued against criticism of certain parts of Descartes' claim, but I will prove that this is not enough to refute the whole. In order to understand Descartes' claim and its extreme view, at least a general understanding of the motive for discussion is necessary. The 17th century was an era of advancement of science, the prosperous scientific community was interested in establishing consistent standards to define what science is. Their science is based on a combination of experience and experience, and ideally there is no prejudice to contaminate the results. However, Descartes believes that the sensation is unreliable and science based only on sensory information is uncertain. French philosopher of the seventeenth century - mathematician René Descartes is a major advocate of the doctrine of natural thought. Descartes and representatives of other continental rationalism highlighted the superiority of God's innate concept of being put on human thought at birth. In addition to mathematical principles and simple ideas, Descartes' main inner thought is God's idea, and this idea can not be derived from experience. Descartes theory believes that the knowledge of God was born to everyone and is the product of faith. There are major differences between individuals and humans due to cultural, linguistic and age-specific influences, but natural thinking is thought to be a more fundamental aspect of human perception.

Descartes and meditation III At the beginning of meditation III, Descartes made considerable progress in breaking skepticism. He systematically investigated all his beliefs using suspicion and analysis methods and ignored his doubt until it reached three beliefs that could not be doubted. First of all, the evil genius who tried to deceive him failed to deceive him that he did not exist and that he actually existed. Second, his essence is to think. Descartes of meditation pointed out his reasoning about the existence of God. The concept he used to prove the existence of God is that God is so unique that the ability to think about existence with infinite power and wisdom must mean existence. The idea is that not so complicated, our thoughts and common things can not produce more complicated things, and God or God is like being. This concept contradicts the fact that I can not prove the existence of God through logic. Descartes and meditation III At the beginning of meditation III, Descartes made considerable progress in breaking skepticism. He systematically investigated all his beliefs using suspicion and analysis methods and ignored his doubt until it reached three beliefs that could not be doubted. First of all, the evil genius who tried to deceive him failed to deceive him that he did not exist and that he actually existed. - About 40 years ago, Maharishi Mahesk Yogi pioneered a plan to transcend meditation. Beyond meditation, it is a natural and essential movement that relieves stress and enhances your physical and mental potential. TM (transcendental meditation) usually takes 15 to 20 minutes twice a day. Usually, some people meditate before breakfast; this practice helps people begin his day as vigilant and energetic. Discussed three meditations of Descartes. His first meditation was called "meditation I: suspicious thing". In this meditation, Descartes recalls that he was deceived by his feeling, and that it has been happening since then, and that may also happen. So he told himself that my beliefs were dangerous and uncertain if I were deceived. It is the recognition of the first meditation that is called the second meditation "meditation II: about the essence of the human mind: it is known better than the body". Descartes believes that he must be present because he is "thoughtful". He can be deceived and can possess ideas and beliefs, so he must exist. His third meditation "Meditation III: About God, He is present" believes that God exists and he rejects the idea that God was invented. He proposed three perspectives; innate, factual and accidental. Descartes believes that God is a natural idea, he is not improvised

According to Descartes, the essence of material material is a simple extension that fulfills the attributes of space. (Med. V) Such solid geometry explains the possibility of dividing other uniform spaces into different parts and is a perfect guide to the essence of the body. It can be seen that there is actually only one type of extension substance, including all substances in a single space. In this way, Descartes concludes that an individual is simply a model of extended existence, can not expand the space, and that all movements must be made by circular vortices. Heidega opposed the way Descartes released the subject from the Middle Ages. In Descartes' philosophy, the theme is the foundation of 'known' and 'known'. Heidegar thinks Descartes is a metaphysician. Descartes's answer to this question is to show it. His answer is to solve the ontological problem through epistemological epistemology. Presence exists at hand. If this shows a different ontological composition than the one at hand, it means something that is actually, eg existing, something, realistic, and external. The current explanation on this is based on the epistemic attitude of "res" cogito, and he interprets himself as existing. But Heidegger thinks our presence in the world far exceeds the understanding of the current 'res'cogito'. As we have seen, Heidegger explained Nietzsche more criticism against Descartes. Heidegger acknowledges that "We do not believe in the same doctrine of Professor Nietzsche Descartes." But Heidegger said: "We are affirming more important things, that we are thinking about colleagues in history." Nietzsche criticized Descartes, despite the obvious difference between the two positions, the Nietzsche project has a profound meaning with the Descartes project, so for Heidegger. "In Nietzsche's metaphysical meaning, only excessive talent is suitable for absolute" machine economy ". 26 Heidegger cites here Nietzsche's strongest subjective statement and explicitly relates it to Descartes' worldview. 27 But in Heidegger's view, Nietzsche is no more than a successor of Descartes.

In the sixth meditation, Descartes pointed out the distinction between the mind and the body. Descartes believes that he shows that when the heart is better known than the body it shows that when in meditation II. However, in the sixth meditation he continues to argue, as he knew his idea clearly and accurately knows that nature is purely thoughtful. Also, the nature of the body consists entirely of expansion, and he can put his mind and body as an independent existence. By the power of God, what you can do with the clearly distinct independence and the existence of other things can be created as a standalone. The hypothesis of the first meditation devil suggests that things may be very different from the way they are displayed. Descartes' Sixth Meditation said, "The way things are displayed, they are very different. Since our perception is expansion, shape, size and movement, certainly, with the physical world , Our recognition has matched it, but the innocence of the first meditation never returns to his comfortable blue sky, the dark earth of the Tang Dynasty, the general knowledge of the sea world In the world His recovery is not a sensory attribute, color, taste and aroma world His expulsion of the familiar world of five senses is not in the evil devil's hand but in the hands of good faith heroes: rational Principle philosopher and scientist, Descartes himself rebuffs his exchange with the devil In the sixth meditation, Descartes pointed out the distinction between the mind and the body. Descartes believes that he shows that when the heart is better known than the body it shows that when in meditation II. However, in the sixth meditation he continues to argue, as he knew his idea clearly and accurately knows that nature is purely thoughtful. Also, the nature of the body consists entirely of expansion, and he can put his mind and body as an independent existence. - Edward Taylor, in "Meditation 42", speakers used a tone of desire to convey anxiety and the sinful nature of people and the mental requirements of God's grace and forgiveness to the overall concept of Heaven It was. In the opening, the speaker described the desire for human beings and the request for material objects. Starting with the first word, "Meditation 42", the type of desire and the desire to feel these poet injection "Apple" (LL) Descartes famous for the sixth paragraph of meditation, the soul existed only in the body and denied. For him, the mind and body are closely linked. Also, rather than through intellectual examination, by feeling (ie, pain, hunger, thirst) we realize what our bodies need. Here, (2) epistemological level is arranged in his metaphysical doctrine of dualism is completely different, Descartes is placed and combines our understanding of the physical and mental phenomenological level I discovered that

Descartes' physical material dualism Through the history of humans, philosophers try to explain where our thoughts and consciousness came from and how we can have our own unimportant characteristics did. We want our physiological brain to automatically give us non-inductive features such as feelings, thoughts, desires, etc., or thinking, interaction with the body, let us feel and think Whether there is a desire. In addition, the mind is the only nonphysical existence in our universe, or another existence that exists like a ghost or a soul. In this paper, we explain Descartes' interactive material dualism and analyze and evaluate it in this paper. In this paper, although this discussion on Descartes' interactive material dualism is effectively effective, it points out that there is no echo because its second premise is incorrect. Although this discussion has a logical framework and deductive validity, we argued, but due to its second premise, it is inevitably wrong. By demonstrating the uniqueness of psychological and physical attributes and states, this paper proposes the existence of several arguments and secondary qualities that support material dualism. This paper also studies the main criticism of interactive material dualism and the problem of physical and mental interaction. If this article is totally effective, the second assumption that you can agree with Descartes' discussion is a mistake as a reader. The first premise of the present discussion is the reconfirmation of Descartes' interactive substance dualism theory that non-critical items can affect physical entities. "Dualism of matter is a spiritual substance that includes psychological features that generally considers the body as a physical object with physical characteristics and the mind can not reduce the body." (Moreland & Craig, 2003) Self or mind Specific electrical and chemical stimuli (physical properties) that cause consciously to experience perceptual quality and consciousness to pain (mental nature). In material dualism, Descartes believes that thoughts and brains interact closely with each other, even if they are different substances with different characteristics. This is considered to be the key point of Descartes in dualism of interactive material.

The discussion of Rene Descartes in "Contemplation for First Philosophy" is questionable about how effective and reasonable they are. He proved the existence of God through the fifth meditation. This is an example of his invalid, therefore irrational argument. Through meditation, Descartes stated a clear and unique idea. Descartes first asked the reader a question and people said they can not believe these clear and unique ideas. "I noticed that the sensations sometimes fooled, as it is a sign of attention, please never trust anyone who deceives us" (Descartes, 60) As I said before, God plays an important role in Death Cart's meditation, including prove the existence of God. Through his meditation, Descart experienced a lot of evidence about the existence of God that starts from meditation 3 through to the end. This is God's first role in the Cartesian system. Because it's like building blocks, an important part of the system structure. Because he uses the concept of God (in particular the deceptive god) to prove the conclusion. Eliminate all the other things he may have doubts. He dispels the allegations of the devil through evidence of the presence of a merciful God. He also used God as evidence of a clear and clear perception. The purpose of this paper is to study Descartes' discussion about the existence of God. First I will consider the evidence of the existence of the Descartes God. Then I will discuss the reason why Descartes prove the existence of God. We also discuss some of the influences of the existence of God. Finally, I will point out some complications and problems in the evidence. The main problem of most religions in the world was that they presupposed faith; this is a person who can not be understood as believing religion. The main evidence of the existence of God in any particular religion is that the Bible tells us about his existence and power - whatever it is. Then we just believe these scriptures. Because we think they come from God. This is a circulation theory and can not be used as evidence. The purpose of this paper is to investigate Descartes' discussion about the existence of God. First, I will consider the evidence of the existence of the Descartes God. Then I will discuss some of the influences of God's existence. Finally, I will point out some of the complexities and problems in the evidence. Evidence of the existence of Descartes' God occurred in the third meditation. He proved his entire claim in the previous meditation, and he must exist for him to think. From this observation, Descartes realized that the concept of his existence is very clear and clear in his mind; based on this clarity and the fact that he just decided his existence, he Derived the rules Unique things are genuine. Descartes begins his proof by dividing "thinking" into four categories - thought (concept), will (choice), emotion (desire)!

In the sixth meditation, Descartes pointed out the distinction between the mind and the body. Descartes believes that he shows that when the heart is better known than the body it shows that when in meditation II. However, in the sixth meditation he continues to argue, as he knew his idea clearly and accurately knows that nature is purely thoughtful. Also, the nature of the body consists entirely of expansion, and he can put his mind and body as an independent existence. By the power of God, what you can do with the clearly distinct independence and the existence of other things can be created as a standalone. The hypothesis of the first meditation devil suggests that things may be very different from the way they are displayed. Descartes' Sixth Meditation said, "The way things are displayed, they are very different. Since our perception is expansion, shape, size and movement, certainly, with the physical world , Our recognition has matched it, but the innocence of the first meditation never returns to his comfortable blue sky, the dark earth of the Tang Dynasty, the general knowledge of the sea world In the world His recovery is not a sensory attribute, color, taste and aroma world His expulsion of the familiar world of five senses is not in the evil devil's hand but in the hands of good faith heroes: rational Principle philosopher and scientist, Descartes himself rebuffs his exchange with the devil In the sixth meditation, Descartes pointed out the distinction between the mind and the body. Descartes believes that he shows that when the heart is better known than the body it shows that when in meditation II. However, in the sixth meditation he continues to argue, as he knew his idea clearly and accurately knows that nature is purely thoughtful. Also, the nature of the body consists entirely of expansion, and he can put his mind and body as an independent existence. - Edward Taylor, in "Meditation 42", speakers used a tone of desire to convey anxiety and the sinful nature of people and the mental requirements of God's grace and forgiveness to the overall concept of Heaven It was. In the opening, the speaker described the desire for human beings and the request for material objects. Starting with the first word, "Meditation 42", the type of desire and the desire to feel these poet injection "Apple" (LL) Descartes famous for the sixth paragraph of meditation, the soul existed only in the body and denied. For him, the mind and body are closely linked. Also, rather than through intellectual examination, by feeling (ie, pain, hunger, thirst) we realize what our bodies need. Here, (2) epistemological level is arranged in his metaphysical doctrine of dualism is completely different, Descartes is placed and combines our understanding of the physical and mental phenomenological level I discovered that

Descartes 'discussion on separable works quotes the missing traitor, Descartes' argument about dualism, that his contemplation of the first philosophy summarizes his ideological theory and its theory, the history of Western thought Pioneering work at the world Relationship with other regions The main argument through meditation raised his universal doubt method through his famous Cogito, and dualism, evidence of God and the world about it. Descartes dualism is one of the most influential thoughts born from work; however, the style of meditation is a personal reflection that allows Descartes to follow the flow of consciousness and discuss slight tangents. Descartes skepticism - Descartes skepticism - Descartes skepticism - Descartes skepticism - Descartes skepticism - Descartes skepticism - Descartes skepticism - Descartes skeptical argument - Descartes skeptical argument - Descartes Skeptical argument - Descartes skeptical argument - Descartes skeptical argument - Descartes skeptical argument In this article, I will study René Descartes' suspicion and reaction to Britain. Bouwsma and Norman Malcolm Bouwsma and Malcolm argued against criticism of certain parts of Descartes' claim, but I will prove that this is not enough to refute the whole. In order to understand Descartes' argument and sometimes radical view, we need at least a general understanding of the motivation for discussion. The 17th century was an era of advancement of science, the prosperous scientific community was interested in establishing consistent standards to define what science is. Their science is based on a combination of experience and experience, and ideally there is no prejudice to contaminate the results. However, Descartes believes that the sensation is unreliable and science based only on sensory information is uncertain.

The purpose of the wax theory is to provide knowledge of a clear and unique "I" which is a sort of mind, but it is important that "the image is made up of thinking, the sensation itself is more obvious than this" It is that. I am "not in imagination" (66). Through wax theory Descartes proves that material things are perceived through our intelligence, not by our senses and imagination. In this discussion, you will see an analysis of Descartes' wax and reasons for doubting his philosophical reasoning. People can see the concept of talent behind the scenes of Descartes' debate, but this sentence is made to remove our deepest understanding of things from feeling rather than protecting talent. It is in the study of the meaning of the discussion of wax that we have reached the essential abstraction of spatial extensions. Of course, it is also going well, but behind the scenes, in meditative theory of meditation we derive this fact from the facts about the existence outside the soul of God. This (native) concept of infinite existence (as in Descartes, God is in our "life") says that we know that there is a world that transcends our thoughts It is that. It is not systematically misunderstood. Part of the problem may be that it is not easy to combine Descartes' identity with heart and consciousness and to combine congenital ideas and principles. In this article, I refer to "Wax theory" proposed by Rene Descartes and explain that it is a valid discussion, but it is not so rational. In Descartes' claim, he observed a part of the wax from the nest box and analyzed the structure and characteristics of the wax with his judgment and sensation. By doing so, he gives the view that wax can not be explained with visual, tactile, or smell. In this discussion, he is trying to explain the difference between judgment and perception. While showing two differences, he revealed the concept of rationalism. The concept of rationalism is based on the definition of the theory of congenital concepts and some general propositions can prove that it applies before or before empirical verification. . Experians believe that perception and sensation are false and misleading.

Thinking about Rene Descartes as we think back to school and thinking about "children with problems", friends with problems, friends complicating everything, we can think like this. Before his work, the world of philosophy was driven by a natural mind. Philosophy comes from that subject, which seems to be thought. After Descartes, there is a big turning point. After him, we can not trust our thought naturally. We have to put all parentheses. To oppose ideas, this is a big problem. My paper is about Rene de Carte's second meditation. In the second meditation, René Descartes' famous motto is "Cogito, Ergo Sum" or "I think I like this", as I also do. Finding his second meditation is the most controversial and interesting thing in his meditation. The second meditation is the most controversial meditation in Descartes meditation. Because his first question method is explicitly introduced. And this is also his idea of ​​getting radical, because it shows that every kind of knowledge must be criticized and that people have to doubt everything, including himself. Rene de Carte (1596 - 1650) Rene de Carte is a French philosopher and mathematician. Descartes made a great contribution to the philosophy of rationalism. Descartes' meditation is epoch-making. Because he doubts the previous belief and is trying to prove their validity through logic. Later empiricists opposed Descartes' method, but his philosophy broke many topics for further discussion. Descartes has been proved to be "the existence of God", but his doubt was an important step in promoting the reasons over faith. Descartes also made an important discovery in geometry, calculus and mathematics analysis. From the grounds to the conclusion After examining the origin of Descartes metaphysics, this paper will question the contradiction of the Cartesian law. Rene Descartes started his investigation by doubting all sorts of knowledge, and he further believed that things that might be suspected were completely wrong. Why is the idea of ​​perfection perfect indefinitely come true using Descartes' method? If infinitely perfect God's thought doubts how he can infer the existence of God from this suspicious thinking?

In his sixth meditation he must return to suspicion raised in the first meditation. In the last part of his sixth meditation he involved physical and mental problems mainly; he tried to prove the existence of material things. In this meditation, he developed his dualistic view by distinguishing between body and mind, but he also revealed their very important relationship. He thinks mainly about the existence of the outside world, and whether our experience has acquired the knowledge of the world, or whether this knowledge is just a fantasy. The first one is related to Descartes. The sixth meditation refutes the possibility that imagination is essential to understanding things and their weakness in imagination, and does not have imagination and an image unrelated to later Descartes. Through his career Descartes attributes an important role in mathematics and physical thinking to imagination. In his last work, the passion of the soul, he made it possible to play an important role in acquiring passion. In meditation, he puts his imagination in transcending behavior and uses ordinary imagination as a simulation simulation model. Even the last three meditals often look like essays, but they still retain meditation and at least an imaginative character. Descartes intends to reach the basic concept of his physics in the latter part, especially the sixth meditation, but his basic goal has not changed. It is a question. For example, in the fifth meditation, I thought about how the necessary attributes that did not appear immediately before unpacking by analysis were related to mathematical ideas. There is some sort of meaning, but it is different from the meaning of other concepts, that is, the meaning of formal existence. Therefore, he saw God's idea in the context of mathematical thinking. It is not the most practical of all imaginable things, but it is the essence of matter.

Descartes' statement about what he calls "real difference" proved the foundation of our contemporary existence and concept of consciousness. While his argument irreversibly affected psychology, neuroscience, philosophy, and other fields, it integrated the concept of a clear dichotomy between mind and body in general consciousness. In this article, I enrich the meaning of the word "real difference" of Descartes, discuss the arguments he uses in "defense" and explain the difference between body and mind (at least in the framework of Descartes Inside). ) Too many, I believe that the mind and body are actually more viable probabilities. In order to understand why this university is so important it is necessary to review the definition of Descartes' real differences. In philosophical principle, Descartes said: "Strictly speaking, the real difference exists only between two or more substances; in fact we can clearly and clearly understand two substances Another matter that you can admit different "(principle, I, § 60, CSM, I, p. 213, AT 28). For Descartes this governs the exact epistemological and ontological separation between the body and the mind. One thing we learned from meditation is that we can perceive ourselves clearly and clearly without body - in the second meditation Cogito, we think about in the fifth meditation You can clearly perceive the body clearly. (Of course, in retrospect, I noticed that I went with wax in a sense) One of the main conclusions of Descartes is that the heart is completely different from the body. But what is "real difference"? Descartes best describes this in section 60 of part 1 of the Principles. Here, he first pointed out that it is a difference between two or more substances. Second, when one substance can be clearly and clearly understood without other substances, a true difference can be seen, and vice versa. Third, this clear and unambiguous understanding indicates that God can bring everything understood in this way. Therefore, in discussing the real differences between the body and mind, Descartes says that 1) the spirit is a substance, 2) it can be clearly and clearly understood without any other substances including the body, 3) You can create spiritual essence in. No other substances have been created. So Descartes is finally discussing the possibilities of the heart and soul without physical existence. In this last meditation, Descartes claims his metaphysical dualism - that there are two finite substances in the universe: thought and body. First, he developed the concept of real distinction: A is quite different from B as far as we can imagine the essence of A independently of our concept B, and vice versa is. He showed how he can conceptualize the essence of mind (thought) independently of the nature of the body (which is an extension), and vice versa. His conclusion is that the mind and body are completely different. He continues to insist that this in principle means that two can exist independently from each other, because God can bring anything Descartes can think of course.

Let's learn about Descartes's skepticism. In order to begin to understand René Descartes' suspicion, it is necessary to stop prejudice and earlier judgment and start with a clean list of "to discover some of the ultimate truths based on all ideas" (Kolak , Pg. 225). Descartes is skeptical of his beliefs and is embarrassed about his ignorance. He began to complete the task of finding absolute truth. Among them he is based on his beliefs. 1637 - Descartes' method papers were published with one of the classical papers of this century. These articles appeared shortly after Galileo condemned and decided that Descartes would not release his huge "world". The importance of combining words with intermediaries is almost not exaggerated. 1638 - The second book by Galileo, mainly "Two new scientific discourses", was published by Protestant Leiden outside Italy. This work attracted the work on Galileo's previous sports and the second "new science" (in retrospect, Galileo was not so successful) dealt with the strength of the material. René Descartes, Methodology, Galileo Galilei, Letters to Tuscany Christina: Pope's interrogation in 1633: Galileo "Sir Isaac Newton", "Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy" Manuel Kant, What is Enlightenment , Dennis Diderot, "Observations of encyclopedias of art and science" Voltaire, philosophical dictionary: British model, Mary Worthcraft, advocacy of women's rights, Jean Jacques Rousseau, association contract Descartes in "methodology" support his argument for immortality of the soul through different arguments. In methodology, Descartes is trying to explain his reasoning method. He explains the development of this approach through a short autobiographical sketch combined with philosophical arguments. Descartes has five parts in his "methodology", which shifts his argument from light theory to human structure theory. Descartes is thinking about the fact that animals resemble humans, as animals have many organs like humans, separating them from humans is a lack of speech or reasoning power. He regards this difference as evidence of a human "rational or calm soul". He observes the mysterious relationship between the soul and the human body and concludes that the soul must live outside the human body.

Descartes and God have many things to discuss in every part of the world. Logic is often used to understand and agree to the subject of these discussions. One such topic can be said to be the greatest topic of modern discussion, the existence of God. Of course, many people believe in higher existence, but how many people are trying to prove the existence of God with logic and rational thinking. It seems very likely, but there is only one such person. Rene Descartes tried to use his own logic to reach the conclusion that a perfect existence exists in the book "contemplation of Philosophy 1" and that its existence itself is his god. French philosopher René de Carte also known as the founder of modern philosophy is a skilled mathematician. Descartes believes fully in God and believes that the universe was created by God. Descartes feels that God has the ultimate power to the Earth and everything there. He may be one of the first philosophers who understood God's power and his power. According to Descartes, God is hard to understand by an incredible number of people in the human brain. The absolute truth is that it is God's theory. The only way to exist in absolute truth is to believe Descartes and the existence of God Descartes will be built on the truth if you realize that he can know that it is true that "I am" is the truth. After Descartes proves its existence, he will think the truth about the essence of God, evidence of the existence of God, and the nature of material objects. The main task in Descartes' meditation is to design a system that allows him to understand the truth. He wants to lay the foundation of all further philosophy The inherent periodicity of Cartesian reasoning is revealed by Arnauld whose objection is called the Cartesian circle. Descartes believes Descartes is based on the fact that Descartes has a clear and definite view of God, but the credibility of the Descartes' clear and unique view is that the fact that God exists rather than a cheater Guaranteed by. Therefore, in order to show the existence of God, Descartes must assume that God exists. Descartes' overall goal is to help humans master and possess nature. He provided an understanding of the tree of the world knowledge trees, flexor optics, meteorology and geometry and established its metaphysical basis in meditation. Then he spent the rest of his life in the field of mechanics, medicine and ethics. Dynamics is the foundation of his physiology and medicine, and this is the basis of his moral psychology.

One of the most important parts of the philosophy of Descartes and Rock is the theory of epistemology, knowledge. So far philosophers have done a lot of attempts to discover the source of knowledge that can be used to judge criteria of knowledge reliability. We tend to be satisfied with understanding almost everything, but it is surprising that it turns out that it is suspicious and uncertain that we believe it to be positive with confidence. In the 17th century, Rene Descartes of France and John Rock of the UK brought religious philosophy to a new direction. The significance of Descartes and Rock is that they are self-identified as philosophical innovators. In Descartes' rationalism (rationality being the main source of human knowledge), God is at the center of philosophical thinking, guaranteeing the reliability of sensory experiences. Locke's more moderate empiricism, which considers the main causes of human knowledge as empirical, led to the development of a more "rational" religious approach. Because their British and mainland believers such as John Toland, Matthew Tindar, Barb Holbach, Claude Adrian Helvetis rejected the tradition, the reporting authority on miracles and revelations Like Descartes, rock is seen as using a process of finding knowledge. The philosophy of René de Carte and John Rock is quite different in many respects. But it is entirely wrong to argue that Rationalist Descartes and Experience Lock do not have similarities. Two epistemologists are considered to have a similar foundation in their philosophical thinking. Through many differences between Descartes and rock, the process of acquiring the basic concept of their existence, the outside world, and knowledge is very similar to each other. John Locke is a British philosopher and one of the most influential Enlightenment thinkers. Locke first asked questions about Descartes' Cogito Ergo Sum philosophy. Locke has an empirical belief that it ignores the concept of congenital concepts and promotes the role of human perception and experience. Locke got inspiration from Occam's razor to explain knowledge and shows that everyone means starting with a whiteboard, meaning a blank state. A blank slate argument may be considered

Descartes believes that the mind and body are two separate entities. Since the body occupies space, it can always be splitable, and since the mind consists of irrelevant ideas, it is inseparable. Using the idea behind Leibniz's law, "different attributes, different things", Descartes began to assemble his argument as he believed his thought and body were completely different. I will review the reason why he thinks he can not divide but thinks he can not do it. Descartes' first meditation included several discussions on Descartes research and analysis. It is his argument that I feel fraud that I chose to analyze. The actual discussion is as follows. (1) My senses may deceive me. (2) If my feelings deceive me, that may always deceive me. (3) If my feelings always deceive me, I do not know the belief I gained through my senses. (4) If you do not know the belief gained through your own senses, you need to stop judging about that belief. Descartes' first meditation, his main purpose was to present three skeptical arguments to doubt his beliefs in his basic beliefs. Descartes regards this as a complex part of his complete epistemological argument. Descartes's skeptical debate is not to deny his basic belief. Instead, he used these arguments to prove the existence of God, one of his major arguments. One of the main premises that Descartes used to prove the existence of God came from the demonic debate he proposed in his first meditation. It is the claim of this demon that is subject to the following discussion. Descartes was skeptical at the first two mediation. Descartes first solves radical skepticism implied by an evil devilish argument by deciding that he is intellectual essence. According to Descartes, this "I" self-view is born, we are born, even a demon can not be doubted.

Descartes 'Meditative Ontology The fifth meditative theory about the existence of the Descartes' God rely on an incompetent notion that existence is perfect that can be predicted by God. I first explain the argument about the existence of the Descartes God and then present his argument in the form of a proposition. Then I will try to support the assertion that there is a predicate that is neither complete nor god. In our mind, we understand the idea of ​​things. These ideas may be entirely in our heads, or they may be irrelevant to our consideration (Ficker 143). Renedecar, one of the philosophers, published "Contemplation of First Philosophy" in 1641. In meditation he suggested people, the universe, and the view of God. This is where I am starting and analyzing Descartes' ontological debate. In order to prove the existence of God, I extract from the fifth meditation. Of course, I discovered that there is an idea of ​​God in my body, that is, the idea of ​​being an extremely perfect existence, I have found this idea as much as any image or digital idea. It belongs to the nature of God It is what I understand that he always exists. Thus, even though not all the things I meditated in the last few days are true, the existence of God has some confidence about the truth of mathematics. In meditation, Descartes supports the existence of God using Anselm 's ontological argument. Descartes first pointed out that the nature of things is different from their existence. The essence of things is that without that nature it can not be its essence. He believes that existence must include all perfection in order to be a perfect being. Completeness is perfect, so a perfect being (God) must exist. The main outline of the Cartesian version of ontological theory is as follows.

In the next article, I will dispute Descartes' interactionism, primarily in his work "The Passion of the Soul", in communication with Princess Elizabeth about the unity of the mind and body. First, I will explain the basic features of the concept of Descartes' interaction. In other words, since the pineal gland is the only part of the brain, it is the "major position" of the mind. The pineal gland also has a series of movements that correspond to the body and soul and may be "destroyed" by the spirit of souls and animals. Interactionism was proposed by French rationalism philosopher Rene Descartes (1596-1650) and continues to be associated with him. Descartes believes that the body is material and features a spatial extent rather than thought and emotion and the mind as an independent issue has no room to spread, but you can think and feel. However, he insists that the two interact, suggesting that this interaction occurs in the pineal gland of the brain. One of the objections that is often raised in interactionism is the problem of causal interaction - how two different substances the theory assumes, how mental and substance can affect each other. Descartes' theory that the interaction between the mind and the material world occurs in the pineal gland was thought to be inappropriate by many philosophers at the time. According to this viewpoint, the heart and body seem to interact, but in reality it is moved only by God, whereas Gottfried Leibniz states that the mind and body are in a pre-established harmony as "monotheism" I believe. Meanwhile, Baruch Spinoza rejects Descartes' dualism and foresees a modern perspective of neutral monism, as it suggests that heart and material are actually attributes of a single substance. Descartes is a materialistic dualist who believes that there is a causal relationship between the dialogueist, thought and body. However, when interaction and material dualism are combined, how non-physical entities that do not spread to the physical world cause changes in the body, and how the body is nonphysical, emotional or physical Does it cause a change in physical health? What? Descartes thought that the pineal gland of the brain might be a relationship between the soul and the body, but then gave up the idea and acknowledged that he did not have the answer to the question. Other believers in the Descartes tradition later believed that the causal relationship between the body and the mind was an opportunity for God's intervention - an obvious causal relationship was not direct, but God's hands are material It was the real cause of action in the world.

How do we know what we know about Descartes' wax channel? Thoughts exist in the mind of intellectual life, but a clear understanding of where these ideas come from is often the focus of discussion. With this in mind René de Carte presented a challenging task to decide where a clear and unique idea comes from. First philosophy, we need to consider special sentences written in contemplation of the way of wax. You should follow Descartes' thought process and discuss the central point of his argument. "How do you know what we know?" This is a question from Rene Descartes and many other philosophers. A special passage written by Descartes in "First Philosophical Meditation" is called "Wax Passage" which explores the nature of material things and our real understanding of them. It should follow Descartes' thought process, and his conclusion is that if all attributes are deprived, the rest are the "essence" of the wax being explained. The wax channel itself is a simple idea. The essence of this sentence is that Descartes attempts to convince the reader that the "clear and unique" idea that a person has against a physical object outside his body is perceived by the heart rather than sensation It is a belief of. Playing the wax, people have some ideas originally thought to result from thinking of five senses (visual, olfactory, sound, taste, feel), but the information gained through our senses is incorrect You may prove to be. essay.com/Rene Descartes is based on the first philosophical meditation, the nature of material things, and their possible understanding. (Example of wax) Descartes' study of the properties of substances based on the passage of the first philosophical thought and its possible understanding. (Example of wax) How do we know what we know about Descartes' wax channel? Thoughts exist in the mind of intellectual life, but a clear understanding of where these ideas come from is often the focus of discussion. With this in mind René de Carte presented a challenging task to decide where a clear and unique idea comes from. First philosophy, we need to consider special sentences written in contemplation of the way of wax. - Lede Descartes' philosophy and scientific method René Descartes (1596 - 1650) is one of the most widely known philosophers in history and is often discussed as an inventor of modern scientific methods. Rene Descartes was born on March 31, 1596 in La Haye in Touraine. As he comes from a wealthy family, there is no real economic concern. At the age of ten, his father sent him to La Fleche of Henry IV. Rene de Carte (1596 - 1650) Rene de Carte is a French philosopher and mathematician. Descartes made a great contribution to the philosophy of rationalism. Descartes' meditation is epoch-making. Because he doubts the previous belief and is trying to prove their validity through logic. Later empiricists opposed Descartes' method, but his philosophy broke many topics for further discussion. Descartes has been proved to be "the existence of God", but his doubt was an important step in promoting the reasons over faith. Descartes also made an important discovery in geometry, calculus and mathematics analysis.

The new perspective of Descartes and the world of new science comes from the new development of science. New ideas and developments contradicted some of the most fundamental ideas in the world at the time. The philosophers related to this new world are Copernicus, Kepler, Bacon, Galileo, Descartes, Rock and so on. Copernicus tried to solve the problem of planetary motion by using the sun as the center of the earth. He made things easier until Newton picked it up and answered some important questions about Copernicus' theory. In the era when Hobbes and Descartes lived, a new science appeared. Gradually more and more people are casting doubts on the purpose of religious existence. For most people who are still practicing, problems posed by new science are gaining attention. Descartes is a devout Catholic, religion should not impede science, and science felt that there is no need to disturb religion, so there is no problem. With his independent thought and physical theory, he tried to sever theology from physics boldly. RenéDescartes (1596-1650) is a French philosopher, mathematician and scientist. Descartes was one of the first people who gave up traditional thinking based on Aristotle's teachings. Instead he promoted a new science based on observation and experimentation. For this purpose, he is known as the father of contemporary philosophy. Reza Khan (1878 - 1944) joined the Iranian army when he was young. After led the coup d'etat in 1921, Khan became the war minister, and became prime minister. Four years later he was elected to Shah and reviewed the government and the country thoroughly. At the beginning of the Second World War, the Soviet Union and the UK occupied Iran. Khan retreated and his son became a shee. The UK exiled Khan to Mauritius and then exiled Johannesburg to Johannesburg. Descartes is the father of contemporary thought. Descartes deals with technical rationality in this way, in particular in the natural sciences, and later as a technical science along this tradition. The problem is old and new. Descartes said that the law of dynamics is the same as the law of nature. He is even thinking of animals as an automata. In other words, nature consists of a material mechanism. Mechanization of the world image using the Dijksterhuis phrase is the result. According to Mr. Descartes, "Nature is as easy to understand as watches and robots, as long as they are properly investigated."

RenéDescartes: "Father of Modern Mathematics" 1596-1650 RenéDescartes was born in La Hehe, France, Touraine in March 1596, died in Stockholm on February 11, 1650. At the age of 8, he was sent to Jesuit School of La Fleche. Due to his poor health, he was allowed to lie down on the bed till late at night. When Pascal visited in 1647, he said that in 1612 someone would not let him go to school and that he would never be able to feel like leaving Paris in 1612. Into French mathematician and philosopher Rene Descartes was one of the first people to counter the tacit scientific world view. At the age of 8, Descartes studied at Ange Jesuit University, La Foche, where he continued studying for eight years. He also continued to acquire a law degree in Paris and learned mathematics and dynamics under the guidance of a Dutch scientist Isaac Beeckman. Descartes is a rationalist as he believes that knowledge is achieved through reason and internal or internal thinking. He is also a faithful Catholic, living in a rapidly growing scientific world. Therefore, Descartes is determined to prove that God exists in the world of this scientific modernization. In order to show this and other beliefs and theory, Descartes began to cast doubt on reality. Rene de Carte (1596 - 1650) Rene de Carte is a French philosopher and mathematician. Descartes made a great contribution to the philosophy of rationalism. Descartes' meditation is epoch-making. Because he doubts the previous belief and is trying to prove their validity through logic. Later empiricists opposed Descartes' method, but his philosophy broke many topics for further discussion. Descartes has been proved to be "the existence of God", but his doubt was an important step in promoting the reasons over faith. Descartes also made an important discovery in geometry, calculus and mathematics analysis. Excellent philosophers, mathematicians, and scientists René Descartes have paved the way for this new way of thinking. The way he breaks down the problem into smaller elements and solve and organize the problem in a rational way is a fundamental feature of modern scientific thinking. Descartes believes that the universe can be described and understood with accurate mathematical laws and relationships; this vision is to describe his breakthrough development in analytical geometry, or geometric shape It is reflected in the use of algebra (Capra and Luisi, 2014a)

During meditation, Descartes' Meditation Descartes aims to eliminate all knowledge that may be suspected. He used the rotten apple analogy in a bucket. There I had to investigate to remove all the apple and decide which apple to leave. Mr. Descartes said that people may get the wrong information, like a rotten apple. Therefore, this information error can lead to erroneous knowledge. According to Descartes' reasonable approach, if facts can be suspected, it can not be considered a certain truth and hence may be ignored. My paper is about Rene de Carte's second meditation. In the second meditation, the famous motto of Rene Descartes is "Cogito, Ergo Sum" or "I think this is my favorite" and as I am also, I think the concepts and ideas presented by Rene Descartes I analyzed and decided to criticize. Finding his second meditation is the most controversial and interesting thing in his meditation. The second meditation is the most controversial meditation in Descartes meditation. Because his first question method is explicitly introduced. And this is also his idea of ​​getting radical, because it shows that every kind of knowledge must be criticized and that people have to doubt everything, including himself. Discussed three meditations of Descartes. His first meditation was called "meditation I: suspicious thing". In this meditation, Descartes recalls that he was deceived by his feeling, and that it has been happening since then, and that may also happen. So he told himself that my beliefs were dangerous and uncertain if I were deceived. It is the recognition of the first meditation that is called the second meditation "meditation II: about the essence of the human mind: it is known better than the body". Descartes believes that he must be present because he is "thoughtful". He can be deceived and can possess ideas and beliefs, so he must exist. His third meditation "Meditation III: About God, He is present" believes that God exists and he rejects the idea that God was invented. He proposed three perspectives; innate, factual and accidental. Descartes believes that God is a natural idea, he is not improvised

Descartes' meditation Descartes chose to write this article to attract me. Descartes is a very intelligent man who wants to understand the world he lives in. The format he is using is unusual. In my opinion, he may have used this format, a replica of the Bible Genesis. And it gave the reader an increasingly deep influence. Descartes' meditation has many similarities with Genesis which is the first book of the Bible. For example, Descartes 'meditation' is written once a day as God created the world once. My paper is about Rene de Carte's second meditation. In the second meditation, René Descartes' famous motto is "Cogito, Ergo Sum" or "I think I like this", as I also do. Finding his second meditation is the most controversial and interesting thing in his meditation. The second meditation is the most controversial meditation in Descartes meditation. Because his first question method is explicitly introduced. And this is also his idea of ​​getting radical, because it shows that every kind of knowledge must be criticized and that people have to doubt everything, including himself. Discussed three meditations of Descartes. His first meditation was called "meditation I: suspicious thing". In this meditation, Descartes reminds him of being deceived by his feeling, and that it has been happening since then, and that may also happen. So he told himself that my beliefs were dangerous and uncertain if I were deceived. It is the recognition of the first meditation that is called the second meditation "meditation II: about the essence of the human mind: it is known better than the body". Descartes believes that he must be present because he is "thoughtful". He can be deceived and can possess ideas and beliefs, so he must exist. His third meditation "Meditation III: About God, He is present" believes that God exists and he rejects the idea that God was invented. He proposed three perspectives; innate, factual and accidental. Descartes believes that God is a natural idea, he is not improvised

This article explains the first question. It is based on Descartes' first two meditations, represents rationalism, and draws comparative perspectives and arguments from the perspective of an experiencer. I will use reference materials for this course, "Think, Simon Blackburn, 1999" and "The Philosophy Gym, Stephen Law, 2003." In addition, "Knowledge" - reference from the seminar slide is also used. In Descartes' first meditation, he thought that in reality everything would think that everything could be a powerful devil's work. My paper is about Rene de Carte's second meditation. In the second meditation, René Descartes' famous motto is "Cogito, Ergo Sum" or "I think I like this", as I also do. Finding his second meditation is the most controversial and interesting thing in his meditation. The second meditation is the most controversial meditation in Descartes meditation. And this is also his idea of ​​getting radical, because it shows that every kind of knowledge must be criticized and that people have to doubt everything, including himself. Discussed three meditations of Descartes. His first meditation was called "meditation I: suspicious thing". In this meditation, Descartes recalls that he was deceived by his feeling, and that it has been happening since then, and that may also happen. So he told himself that my beliefs were dangerous and uncertain if I were deceived. It is the recognition of the first meditation that is called the second meditation "meditation II: about the essence of the human mind: it is known better than the body". Descartes believes that he must be present because he is "thoughtful". He can be deceived and can possess ideas and beliefs, so he must exist. His third meditation "Meditation III: About God, He is present" believes that God exists and he rejects the idea that God was invented. He proposed three perspectives; innate, factual and accidental. Descartes believes that God is a natural idea, he is not improvised In meditation 3, Descartes summarized his meditation so far and categorized his thoughts. The main element of the third meditation is the trademark theory of God's existence. Several ideas such as unicorns and mermaids are born, or basically within us, but others are not. Descartes' claim is that human beings are born with the concept of inherent nature, which God has attached to us "his trademark". Descartes' fourth mediation focused first on whether God is a liar, followed by a clear and unique idea afterwards. Intentional fraud is only performed by incomplete (not complete) existence. Because God is perfect, God is not a crook. Descartes wrote that his judgment comes from God and that he will not make mistakes if correctly used. Only when you decide that you do not know, you can make a mistake. Consideration on "Descartes meditation - the theme of the first philosophical meditation"

The purpose of this article by Descartes' Cogito is to study Cogito's discussion of Descartes, his question about small and universal elements, and the meaning of these discussions. First, I will summarize the suspicion that Descartes brought to a small universal factor in his first meditation. Second, I will summarize and describe Cogit's assertion, Descartes' famous "So I am" (note that this famous meaning is not actually what Descartes mentioned before) It is meaning from him, argument of his own existence). Here Kokokokokokoko Kokokokokokoko Kokokokokokoko Kokokokokokoko Kokokokokokoko Kokokokokokoko Kokokokokokoko Kokokokokokoko Kokokokokokoko Kokokokokokoko Kokokokokokoko Kokokokokokoko Kokokokokokoko Kokokokokokoko Kokokokokokoko it it it it to refer to an example of this criticism: that it is to see it:. "Commitment to the error of circulation inference because" Since I assumed "I" "I", "I think," the necessity of ownership is a logical matter and there is nothing to say about what actually exists - "(Harrison-Barbet , 126) Indeed, before declaring this claim Descartes really wondered what he did - all but the things he needed to build - he assumed "me" and already "thinking" It has the concept of (and inevitable) The concept of "no thought") in. In fact, Descartes did not doubt all as he tried. What underlies Descartes is that he can not doubt his existence. Descartes 'Cogito', 'So I think so' refers to this personal reality. That is the principle of establishing existence from the facts of that idea. His first axiom can be understood as "I am genuine", or better, consciousness is genuine. Despite simplicity and obvious evidence, this axiom, like all starting points, should not be neglected. As a mathematician, Descartes is tackling the logic to bring out universal truth, but first you must accept subjective observation. In his era, even if it is not a promise of "faithful" reality ", courage is necessary for this acceptance, and deep insight as to what is built based on it is necessary. Descartes believes that "cogito" (because it is called standard) is the first and most certain event of "methodologically philosophical person" (Phil. 1: 7, AT 8 a: 7). Should the certainty of this cogito be linked to "I think," "I", "Yes" (ie, their logical relationship)? If Cogito is to play the basic role Descartes gives it, it is inferred that it must be attached to all of these. However, this answer depends on whether cogito is understood as inference or intuition - the problems discussed below

Descartes of knowledge The problem we actually have is the problem solved by philosophers. In this article, I see the sentence that I think that I am a phrase brought by Rene de Carte. This sentence is the pillar of the whole philosophy that Descartes exists in reality. As far as we are concerned, we will exist. When we see the way of existence, we must first deny that any sensual data we receive is reliable, or imagine that it is wrong I can do it. According to Mr. Descartes, knowledge is "a belief based on a strong reason that never is shaken by strong reasons" (Newman, 2010). Descartes uses a philosophical approach of doubt to believe that pursuit of belief that reflects "most complete certainty" is necessary for pursuit of knowledge (Newman, 2010). The first and most important "determinism" obtained through this process is the existence of self, "I think, therefore I am" (Descartes). Descartes later claimed that the existence of God is obvious as "perfect creator," God alone can bring the thought of God under the existence of thought "(Baird & Kaufmann, 2003, p.397 ) Cogito: Background of the existence of the Descartes God Descartes is skeptical of the knowledge gained over the years. Because he believes that true knowledge requires certainty. In order to get certainty we need a foundation and then we need a way to build from this foundation to other truths. Descartes explained his foundation with his first meditation. His starting point is a gathering of beliefs. Therefore, he will look for some fundamental beliefs suspicion, find some reason for doubt, and all other beliefs based on basic belief will collapse. Because we can dream, he refuses to get faith through emotion. He rejects transcendent beliefs like mathematical truths because he may have even bad liars, he is strong enough that he may be responsible for convincing him of these beliefs . Because of his doubts about his faith, Descartes has discovered that he existed, even if there is a powerful con artist, he must exist.

Rene Descartes was born on March 31, 1596 in La Haye Touraine, France. Descartes is considered "Jack in all industries" and contributes greatly to the fields of anatomy, cognitive science, optics, mathematics and philosophy. He is known as the father of contemporary rationalism, wealthy people, scholars, pilgrims, travelers, and faithful followers of Roman Catholic faith. He received education at Ange Jesuit University, La Fleche. Several months after college opening in January 1604, he entered college at the age of eight. My paper is about Rene de Carte's second meditation. In the second meditation, René Descartes' famous motto is "Cogito, Ergo Sum" or "I think I like this", as I also do. Finding his second meditation is the most controversial and interesting thing in his meditation. The second meditation is the most controversial meditation in Descartes meditation. Because his first question method is explicitly introduced. And this is also his idea of ​​becoming extreme, because all sorts of knowledge must be criticized and people have to doubt everything, including himself. Rene de Carte (1596 - 1650) Rene de Carte is a French philosopher and mathematician. Descartes made a great contribution to the philosophy of rationalism. Descartes' meditation is epoch-making. Because he doubts the previous belief and is trying to prove their validity through logic. Later empiricists opposed Descartes' method, but his philosophy broke many topics for further discussion. Descartes has been proved to be "the existence of God", but his doubt was an important step in promoting the reasons over faith. Descartes also made an important discovery in geometry, calculus and mathematics analysis.

Looking at the history of metaphysics, what is the problem? It was answered in incomplete, dissatisfied or complicated ways, but Spinoza tried to answer this question in a special way by describing God and his nature. Based on Spinoza's point of view, the quality of God can be called an attribute, and its pattern is only the influence of matter. In this article I will explain in detail Spinoza 's important ontology, its attributes, and their common relationships that define God as the sole substance. Running Head: DESCARTES VS SPINOZA 1 Issue II: On the physical and mental relationship between Descartes and Spinoza Nicole Yang 20502251 PHIL 384 July 23, 2014 How do the different entities of the two dimensions interact? Human thought and unification of the body are persistent philosophical problems that have been sought since ancient Greece, and it is one of the major problems studied by Descartes and Spinoza. Descartes started this discourse at a rationalist school, and Spinoza later answered his work. In this article, we compare the views of Descartes and Spinoza about human thought and body relationship and keep Spinoza's assertion. Similarity Descartes and Spinoza have relatively little similarity between beliefs about the connection between the body and the mind. The first point determines the epistemological independence of the mind and the body Baruch Spinoza agrees with Descartes in its ethics that the problem can only be identified by its nature. However, he rejected Descartes' dualism. Spinoza objected to Descartes that thought and body had no influence on each other and were two attributes of the problem. Spinoza believes that the body and mind must not be substances different from each other because the substance definition requires that only a single substance exists. For him, God is everything, it's all. He is not a transitive, but an inner one

Descartes' first meditation, his main purpose was to present three skeptical arguments to doubt his beliefs in his basic beliefs. Descartes regards this as a complex part of his complete epistemological argument. Descartes's skeptical debate is not to deny his basic belief. Instead, he used these arguments to prove the existence of God, one of his major arguments. One of the main premises that Descartes used to prove the existence of God came from the demonic debate he proposed in his first meditation. Descartes' first meditation in Descartes' first meditation analysis, Descartes' overall intent was to present that our recognition and emotions are flawed and should not be fully trusted. His purpose is to make the utmost doubt to our senses. In order to convey this idea, Descartes has three major discussions on the first meditation. Discussion of dreams, discussion of deceiving God, and devil "genius of evil". Descartes' dream argument says there is no clear transition from dream to reality, and dreams are very close to reality so people can never be sure if they are dreaming ... more to see Pondering the first philosophy validates Descartes' debate about the existence of God. The purpose of this paper is to explore Descartes' inference and proof of the existence of God. In the third meditation, Descartes presented two arguments to prove the existence of God, a trademark argument and a traditional cosmological argument. His claims are powerful and relatively realistic, but they do not prove the existence of God. At the beginning of meditation, Descartes began to refuse My intention in this article is to demonstrate that the discussion on the existence of God and the fear of deception in Descartes 'First Philosophy' controversy is rather weak and does not prove his conclusion. To support these arguments, we first outline the two concrete meditations and explain the proposed discussion. Later, I criticize his argument and reveal unjust conclusions. Suspicion of text includes features of God's proposal, perfect conditions, and the nature of fraud. The overview includes a discussion on whether Descartes (also called Reinatus) succeeded in his project.

In contemplation of the first philosophy, Descartes tried to explain the cause of human error. Mr. Descartes said that an error "Because intention is advanced over intellect" occurred (Cartesle, p. 39). That is because our intelligence is limited; it is limited to the perception of something. Our will, the ability to choose is not limited, it has unlimited capacity. Therefore, we sometimes try to do something we can not fully understand. As I will briefly explain, if you agree with all his terms, Descartes' discussion is very reasonable (intelligence is limited, so the will is infinite). An important part of the description of Descartes' free will is to explain the cause of human error. After the first three meditation, Descartes concluded that "God can not deceive" (4th meditation, 37). When discussing the ability to judge, Descartes pointed out, "Like all other things, of course, it is obtained from God" (ibid). If your ability to accept the judgment comes from God and God is a perfect non-deception, you seem to conclude that the power of trial never goes bad. After all, how is the teacher from God incomplete? It is at this point that Descartes began to focus on explaining the causes of human mistakes. Because judgment is from God, human beings often make mistakes. Descartes' judgment theory, he was able to explain the evil of the error using the defense of free will. For Descartes, judgment is the result of the interaction between two different departments: Will and understanding. To understand is to present an assertion that we approve, then whether the intention applies to the intention: the intention depends only on the ability of something to do or not of us. When intelligence places something in affirmation or rejection or pursuit or avoidance, our tendency does not make us feel that we are determined by any external forces. (Descartes 1984: 40)

Hitchcock / Descartes I am really awake, enter for philosophy. I only saw Hitchcock 's movie' Shadow of doubt 'and' Not so good god 'planting a lot of thoughts in my mind (Descartes 16). This is sarcastic because the theme of this movie is based on human understanding of doubt, dream, kindness, evil, ignorance, knowledge. This movie is a set of neat staircases leading to the whole American family house and a private staircase to escape beside the house. So, how do you talk about hitchcock ghost movies? In the book after Hitchcock (indeed worth checking Hitchcock fans), is there an article "Psychology or Psychology" by Ina Rae Hark? He explained that although Hitchcock never solved the existence of ghosts in his film, he believed in the "psychological phenomenon" of the deceased. Indeed, the majority of Horror's master film tension is from psychology, voyeurism (back window) to thief (Marney), vertigo (vertigo, obviously). In an article about Alfred Hitchcock 's 1964 movie Marnie, Richard Brody talked about famous dizziness and the "conspiracy of silence" around the bird' s director. He pointed out that although Cinephiles prefers to admire Hitchcock's crafts, arguing about the real world's obsession should be avoided. These obsession pass through this type of craft. Sexual desire, his life was suffering Because of lack of satisfaction, he suffered from being unable to turn fantasies into reality, then was virtualized through his art. It relates only to Hitchcock. That is why it is very unproductive for filmmakers and critics to worship Hitchcock as the principle of supervision's accuracy and control. " Psycho and Sir Alfred Joseph Hitch Cocks · Alfred · Joseph · Hitchcock was born on 13th August 1899 in the East London district of Layton Stone. He is the youngest son of William and Emma Wellan Hitchcock, the son of poultry dealers and fruit importers. He received education at Saint Ignatius University in London. At the age of sixteen he studied engineering and voyage at the University of London. - Popular criminal novels tend to maintain and challenge traditional customs of a given type, for their background purposes. For many generations, Arthur Doyles' Basqueville Hound is the most popular classic, built around a series of conventions centered around the mysterious Sherlock Holmes as a catalyst for future writers.

People live one day under the same guidance of their fathers They often question their existence in the universe and try to understand the world around them. People often question the existence in the universe. Philosophers try to answer questions most people may not think about in their daily lives. Most philosophers try to understand the truth of logic problems through epistemology. Epistemology is "philosophical field of study of the nature and possibilities of knowledge" (Soccio). Two philosophers, Sir Francis Bacon and Rene Descartes, used scientific methods. Francis Bacon is an Englishman who likes Descartes to refuse Aristotle's scientific assumption and is working on "knowledge issues". Besides, both of them disdain the ideological tradition of medieval colleges who want to adapt the world to the teachings of the church. While bacon emphasizes experimentation and observation, Descartes focuses mainly on emphasis on human reasoning. Francis Bacon said that science is a way of improving people's lives by leading inventors' real skills. Both of these people help to bring scientific methods to understand other possible knowledge. They paved the way for "enlightenment in 1700," and spread the idea of ​​possible human progress. A new scientific method was developed in the beginning of the 17th century, and unlike the earlier method, it started not from Aristotle and Ptolemy but from observation and experiments, not from the Bible. Renhe amp; eacute; Descartes dismissed Aristotle's scientific hypothesis. He also challenged the academic tradition of a medieval university designed to integrate the material world into the teachings of the Church. Descartes emphasizes that human reasoning is the best way to understand. Descartes' most famous statement "I think so, I am like this" began with his writings "discourse theory". Thinkers like Descartes will help apply scientific methods to the pursuit of all knowledge. They also spread the possibility of human progress The theory of knowledge project which is best linked to analogy of architecture can be traced back to the thought of ancient Greece - Aristotle and geometry. Descartes' effective homage to Aristotle is of course welcomed by his Aristotle's audience. However, Descartes believes that the principle of Aristotle's fundamentalism is incomplete, at least when applied to metaphysical investigation. The way he doubts it is designed to complement fundamentalism. As mentioned in the above citations, the two methods should work together. Let's think about each method

Descartes 'Second Arbitration - Wax Art In Descartes' s second mediation, the two philosophical ideologies, including empiricists and rationalists, are opposite each other. Experiences believe in knowledge through experience, but rationalists believe in knowledge gained from logic. Descartes uses the concept and concept of "wax" to understand what the reality of wax is. It is truly wax. How do you know that wax disappears like wax, smells the same, or can not feel the same way? In the third mediation of René Descartes's "First Philosophy Mediation" (entitled "About the existence of God"), Descartes established the principle of whatever is clearly recognizable by natural light. It is all true, and we use it to establish the existence of God. In meditation, 2 Descartes decides his real existence (after paying attention to meditation). In meditation, Descartes pointed out that he knew that he had ideas about God in his mind and asked why he thought about it. For Descartes, a business must have as much reality as reality. Since Descartes and other limited existence are less restrictive than the reality of God, only God can cause God's thought (see the summary of another God's proof of Descartes). This means that Descartes must exist in God. If God does not exist, Descartes will wonder if he can exist with his idea about God. So God must exist to be the reason for our existence. Descartes was skeptical at the first two mediation. Descartes first solves radical skepticism implied by an evil devilish argument by deciding that he is intellectual essence. According to Descartes, this "I" self-view is born, we are born, even a demon can not be doubted. Second argument about the existence of God. Because Descartes believes that existence is perfect, it can become a predicate to God. First, I will explain what the ontological argument of the existence of God is. Next, I will explain why Descartes decided to incorporate God into his philosophical approach. As a predicate of God existence reveals some truth about God. Ontology seeks to prove the existence of God from a transcendental point of view The basic premise of Descartes' second ontology theory is simple. The essence of God is that he is the best being. To exist is one of God's completion. Therefore, God must exist. Descartes believes that if God does not exist, he can not think about God in his head. All faith in God rests on the fact that he is perfect. Descartes said that he can not think about God in other ways. God must exist because he can not regard God as absent. The concept of God is a perfect being and is perfect in every infinite aspect and exist must exist to be one of his accomplishments. After that, the discussion of Descartes was only God's reflection to prove the existence of God. 5th meditation at essay.com / Descartes In this article we will provide insight into Descartes' fifth meditation and the existence of God. Descartes '5th meditation This article provides insight into Descartes' fifth meditation and the existence of God.

When René Descartes once was geometry, we were told that the earth is the center of the universe. The sun, the moon and all the planets are even unknown and are all spinning over our planet. Look at this statement and think about what our species think about this idea. Prove his theory through advanced mathematics and perseverance, Renedecart changed other of these secular assumptions and proved that everything was wrong. The suspicious way of Rene de Carte is simply a mathematical way when he finds unanswered questions about the universe. My paper is about Rene de Carte's second meditation. In the second meditation, the famous motto of Rene Descartes is "Cogito, Ergo Sum" or "I think this is my favorite" and as I am also, I think the concepts and ideas presented by Rene Descartes I analyzed and decided to criticize. Finding his second meditation is the most controversial and interesting thing in his meditation. The second meditation is the most controversial meditation in Descartes meditation. Because his first question method is explicitly introduced. And this is also his idea of ​​getting radical, because it shows that every kind of knowledge must be criticized and that people have to doubt everything, including himself. Rene de Carte (1596 - 1650) Rene de Carte is a French philosopher and mathematician. Descartes made a great contribution to the philosophy of rationalism. Descartes' meditation is epoch-making. Because he doubts the previous belief and is trying to prove their validity through logic. Later empiricists opposed Descartes' method, but his philosophy broke many topics for further discussion. Descartes has been proved to be "the existence of God", but his doubt was an important step in promoting the reasons over faith. Descartes also made an important discovery in geometry, calculus and mathematics analysis.

In his sixth meditation he must return to suspicion raised in the first meditation. In the last part of his sixth meditation he involved physical and mental problems mainly; he tried to prove the existence of material things. In this meditation, he developed his dualistic view by distinguishing between body and mind, but he also revealed their very important relationship. He thinks mainly about the existence of the outside world, and whether our experience has acquired the knowledge of the world, or whether this knowledge is just a fantasy. The first one is related to Descartes. The sixth meditation refutes the possibility that imagination is essential to understanding things and their weakness in imagination, and does not have imagination and an image unrelated to later Descartes. Through his career Descartes attributes an important role in mathematics and physical thinking to imagination. In his last work, the passion of the soul, he made it possible to play an important role in acquiring passion. In meditation, he puts his imagination in transcending behavior and uses ordinary imagination as a simulation simulation model. Even the last three meditals often look like essays, but they still retain meditation and at least an imaginative character. Descartes intends to reach the basic concept of his physics in the latter part, especially the sixth meditation, but his basic goal has not changed. It is a question. For example, in the fifth meditation, I thought about how the necessary attributes that did not appear immediately before unpacking by analysis were related to mathematical ideas. There is some sort of meaning, but it is different from the meaning of other concepts, that is, the meaning of formal existence. Therefore, he saw God's idea in the context of mathematical thinking. It is not the most practical of all imaginable things, but it is the essence of matter.

Descartes' first meditation, Rene de Carte, decided to break down the pattern of traditional thinking, and is still being debated today. He is considered an influential abstract thinker; some of his main ideas are still being discussed by philosophers all over the world. While he is writing "meditation", he long forced himself away from the outside world, essentially tearing his traditional thought and making some conclusions about what exists and what is present I am trying. Descartes has to start doubting all the beliefs that come to him through emotion, to show that science depends on a solid foundation, and that these foundations exist in thought rather than sensation . Descartes' first meditation in Descartes' first meditation analysis, Descartes' overall intent was to present that our recognition and emotions are flawed and should not be fully trusted. His purpose is to make the utmost doubt to our senses. In order to convey this idea, Descartes has three major discussions on the first meditation. Discussion of dreams, discussion of deceiving God, and devil "genius of evil". Descartes' dream argument says there is no clear transition from dream to reality, and dreams are very close to reality so people can never be sure if they are dreaming ... more to see Pondering the first philosophy validates Descartes' debate about the existence of God. The purpose of this paper is to explore Descartes' inference and proof of the existence of God. In the third meditation, Descartes presented two arguments to prove the existence of God, a trademark argument and a traditional cosmological argument. His claims are powerful and relatively realistic, but they do not prove the existence of God. At the beginning of meditation, Descartes began to refuse Descartes' first meditation, his main purpose was to present three skeptical arguments to doubt his beliefs in his basic beliefs. Descartes regards this as a complex part of his complete epistemological argument. Descartes's skeptical debate is not to deny his basic belief. Instead, he used these arguments to prove the existence of God, one of his major arguments. One of the main premises that Descartes used to prove the existence of God came from the demonic debate he proposed in his first meditation. It is the claim of this demon that is subject to the following discussion.

Descartes, Plato and Hume's Thought A direct starting point for Plato's philosophical speculation is the teaching of Socrates. When Socrates tried to define the term of knowledge to refute skepticism of refinement, he taught that the only true knowledge is to acquire knowledge through concepts. He said that this concept represents all the reality of one thing. As Socrates uses, this is only a principle of knowledge. Plato regards it as the existence principle. "If this concept represents all the reality of things, reality needs to be in an ideal order, not necessarily things themselves, but on them, in one world" (Chaput, C . This article explains the similarities and differences between Rene Descartes and John Locke, David Hume and Plato. They each believe in rationalism or empiricism. In contrast to experience, rationalists think that a series of important basic concepts are intuitively and intuitively known. For rationalists, is knowledge born? From information sources such as sensation. They are known as Descartes, Plato. Experiors believe that all conception followers eventually return to experiences such as perception and emotion. What? There are no ideas or concepts without impressions or emotions. What? David Hume and Rene Descartes are philosophers who oppose the origins of ideas. Descartes believes in three types of ideas, namely birth, coincidence, and imagination. He said that God existed because of his existence, and from his thoughts on what is perfect like God. Meanwhile, Hume believes that the idea comes from one impression, an impression. Both theories have advantages and disadvantages, but I prefer Hume's theory over Descartes. Descartes believes that imagination does not help humans. Descartes' definition of thinking exists in thought, only things that represent others are called thinking. His argument is that the essence of thought that constitutes the heart can get God's idea, but on the contrary, humans can think about God in other ways. One of the main advantages of Descartes is his view of objective reality, which is a reality view. This idea can be explained in two ways. Classical philosophers such as Plato, Aristotle, Spinoza, Descartes, Hobbes, Hume, Rock, and others all understand emotions as the first concept to understand emotions without constituent elements. He believes that scientific psychology should stop thinking of emotions as 'an eternal and sacred spiritual entity like old and invariable species in natural history' (James 1890: 449). James's proposal is often called James Lange's theory and is similar to the theory provided by Lange (1885) that emotions are a perception sense of autonomy and changes in physiological conditions associated with exercise . Functions For example, when we think that we are in danger, this perception directly causes a series of physical reactions, and our understanding of these responses constitutes fear.

Discussion of Rene Descartes on the existence of God Rene Descartes's debate about the existence of God is related to his rationalistic deduction reasoning. Descartes concluded that the truth about the existence of God exists in His idea about the completeness of God and the essence of God (as a complete existence that must exist to be perfect). As a rationalist philosopher, Descartes truncates human knowledge as a product of our sensory data (our senses), but an epistemological sense that our knowledge can be obtained through a process of deducing our own idea I support the position. RenéDescartes, often called the father of modern philosophy, has developed Anselm's assertion when trying to prove the existence of God in the meaning of the word "God". Ontological arguments are a priori arguments. The basis of these arguments depends on the understanding of the essence of the human god. The definition of Anselm's god is "an extremely perfect existence", which is the basis of his argument. God must be something that can not be considered absent: if you imagine a triangle, one of its main features is that it has three sides and three corners. These are triangle predicates. Descartes has expanded his point of view. This time I mentioned the attribute of God. If you imagine something perfect, it must be more perfect if it exists. Also, the most perfect ones have all attributes including existence. Therefore, Descartes believes that a very perfect existence has all the predicates. Discussion of Rene Descartes on the existence of God Rene Descartes's debate about the existence of God is related to his rationalistic deduction reasoning. Descartes concluded that the truth about the existence of God exists in His idea about the completeness of God and the essence of God (as a complete existence that must exist to be perfect). - All moral arguments about the existence of God are based on the principle that all of us share common sense of morality. Despite cultural differences, in a broad sense, people all over the world have ambiguous thoughts about right and wrong; a moral argument to the existence of God is that this mutual understanding is evidence of the existence of God I will say that. Immanuel Kant advocated this argument (not a moral argument); a god as a source of objective morality

In his contemplation about the first philosophy, Descartes said: "I have a clear and clear idea of ​​myself, because I do not think about just thinking about things. As long as it is mere expansion and not thinking about it, "[1] the concept that the mind is the subject of invisible thinking and the body is a tangible subject unthinkable is called Descartes dualism . The purpose of this article is to explore how Descartes proves that mind and soul are inherently completely different from the body and whether he will succeed or not. One of the main conclusions of Descartes is that the heart is completely different from the body. But what is "real difference"? Descartes best describes this in section 60 of part 1 of the Principles. Here, he first pointed out that it is a difference between two or more substances. Second, when one substance can be clearly and clearly understood without other substances, a true difference can be seen, and vice versa. Third, this clear and unambiguous understanding indicates that God can bring everything understood in this way. Therefore, in discussing the real differences between the body and mind, Descartes says that 1) the spirit is a substance, 2) it can be clearly and clearly understood without any other substances including the body, 3) You can create spiritual essence in. No other substances have been created. So Descartes is finally discussing the possibilities of the heart and soul without physical existence. Make an agenda for discussion of thought and body relationship after that. Descartes believes that thinking and body are different "substances". He believes that the body spreads in space and can not be thought of as a substance that you can feel or think about; on the contrary, thinking is an unthinkable, unthinkable, and undetectable substance. However, it is not easy to understand how they can cause and influence when thoughts and bodies are substances of completely different origin. Princess Elizabeth in Bohemia strongly emphasized him with a letter of 1643: In the 1640's, Descartes student and friend Henrik Regius announced a major newspaper distorting Descartes' mind theory. The two men quarreled, Descartes refused with a title with a barbecue title, even refused to recognize the name of Regius. Declaration: It is simply referred to as "a comment to a big hit". There is a "happy fact" parade. And it shows that Descartes believes that monkeys and monkeys can talk. He does not believe such a thing. According to Philosophy Encyclopedia of Stanford University Descartes denies that animals are even conscious. This fact arises from the misunderstanding of the letter written by Descartes in 1646, and he attributed this idea to "barbarians".

In meditation 6 entitled "The existence of material things and the real distinction between the body and the mind" In Meditation 6, the important thing Descartes explores is the relationship between the body and the mind. Descartes believes that the mind and body are separate, they are two different substances. He believes this is a clear and obvious truth, and that it is a Cartesian true knowledge quality. On the other hand, I do not agree that the mind and body are separate and the mind can exist without body. Running Head: DESCARTES VS SPINOZA 1 Issue II: On the physical and mental relationship between Descartes and Spinoza Nicole Yang 20502251 PHIL 384 July 23, 2014 How do the different entities of the two dimensions interact? Human thought and unification of the body are persistent philosophical problems that have been sought since ancient Greece, and it is one of the major problems studied by Descartes and Spinoza. Descartes started this discourse at a rationalist school, and Spinoza later answered his work. In this article, we compare the views of Descartes and Spinoza about human thought and body relationship and keep Spinoza's assertion. Similarity Descartes and Spinoza have relatively little similarity between beliefs about the connection between the body and the mind. The first point determines the epistemological independence of the mind and the body The dualism of Descartes' mind and matter means the concept of humanity. According to Descartes, humans are a complex existence of thought and body. Descartes prioritizes the mind and thinks that the mind can exist without the body but the body can not exist without the mind. In meditation, Descartes believes that although the mind is a substance, the body consists only of "accidents". However, he believes that the mind and body are closely related. Nature tells me through pain, hunger, thirst, etc. Together, I will form a unit with the body. I will not feel pain even if my body is hurt, but I will only be perceived by intelligence just as a crew sees something broken on his ship. Descartes' view of the mind and body problems is called interaction. He said that the mind and body communicate with each other without mutual exchange. He insists that Meditation 6, the relationship between body and mind is not similar to the relationship between pilot and ship. This relationship has no intimate relationship. According to him he says that our relationship with our soul and body is not such a type as our relationship with our soul and body is too intimate. "The pineal gland is also known as the pineal gland, a small endocrine gland in the brain of a vertebrate, a small endocrine gland in the brain of a vertebrate It is an effect that affects the adjustment of the awakening / sleep mode It produces a certain melatonin, and the light cycle of the hormone (seasonal function, it seems like a small pine cone, located near the center of the brain, between the two hemispheres hidden in the two circular thalamids It is shaped.

The direct starting point of Plato's philosophical speculation is the teaching of Socrates. When Socrates tried to define the term of knowledge to refute skepticism of refinement, he taught that the only true knowledge is to acquire knowledge through concepts. He said that this concept represents all the reality of one thing. As Socrates uses, this is merely the principle of knowledge. Plato regards it as the existence principle. "If this concept represents all the reality of things, the reality needs to be in an ideal order, not necessarily the objects themselves, but among them among themselves" (Chaput, C. p . 2). So, for this concept Plato has been replaced ... See more This is the work of philosophy. "Therefore, philosophy is trying to rise from phenomena or external knowledge to ontology or reality" (Chaput, C. p. 4) The view of Hume's philosophical thinking thinks that there are considerable differences in the perception of the heart when people feel overheating pain or warmth of warmth but this is caused by his imagination Is expected. These ideas look like one thing, but they can not reach the origin of thinking. Hume believes that when these feelings fell on us it can be said that we are almost watching whether it feels it. According to Hume, when we reflect past feelings and emotions, our idea is a faithful mirror and truly duplicates their purpose. He now believes that we can divide all spiritual perceptions into two categories or species. Lower coercion and vigor is often called thought or thought. Other species require names of languages, but other species do not have a specific purpose in philosophy. "So, we can use a bit of freedom, called impression, in a sense, using that word is different from usual" (Hume, 316). When we think about any of the emotions and behaviors above, the impression is different from the idea, and the idea is not so sharp awareness. At first glance, it seems nothing. David Hume and Rene Descartes are philosophers who oppose the origins of ideas. Descartes thinks that there are three kinds of ideas: a birth, a coincidence, and an imaginary thing. He said that God exists because of his existence, and from his thoughts on what is perfect like God. On the other hand, Hume thinks that one thought comes only from the impression. Both theories have advantages and disadvantages, but I prefer Hume's theory over Descartes. Descartes believes imagination can not help humans. The definition of Descartes' thinking exists in thinking, only things that represent other things are called thinking. His argument is that the essence of thinking that constitutes the heart can get God's idea, but on the contrary, humans can think about God in other ways. One of the main advantages of Descartes is his view of objective reality, which is a reality view. This article explains the similarities and differences between Rene Descartes and John Locke, David Hume and Plato. They each believe in rationalism or empiricism. Rationalists, in contrast to experience, think that a series of important basic concepts are intuitively and intuitively known. For rationalists, is knowledge born? From information sources such as sensation. They are known as Descartes, Plato. Experiors believe that all conceptual tracking ultimately returns to experiences such as perception and emotion. What? There are no ideas or concepts without impressions or emotions. What?

Descartes's fantasies and physical and mental problems After waking up from the "dreaming fantasy" and advising them to change the way of thinking into conceptualization, Descartes seems to have forgotten the important problem of this intermittent leap. Therefore, it also seems generally to be professional, it is infected with philosophical research and education. Here the process of demanding discontinuity is very important in space, human life, and human thought. This ontological event can not be dealt with in dualism, materialistic or postmodern. The physical problem of the mind was caused by the early philosopher Descartes who believed that the mind is essentially a way of thinking and that the body is an expansion of the space. Descartes believes that the body affects the perception of the mind, and that the mind affects the behavior of the body. Another early philosopher believed that there was a bi-directional interaction between the spirit and the substance. - ... The elements in Aldo Rossi's work include "repeat and fix". As he said, building elements help create world reality and provide tolerable events for humans. When Rossi designed a public building, he recalled the concepts and theories of the city and made a small version of the city (ie Teatro Del Mondo). The dualism of Descartes' mind and matter means the concept of humanity. According to Descartes, humans are a complex existence of thought and body. Descartes prioritizes the mind and thinks that the mind can exist without the body but the body can not exist without the mind. In meditation, Descartes believes that although the mind is a substance, the body consists only of "accidents". However, he believes that the mind and body are closely related. Nature tells me through pain, hunger, thirst, etc. Together, I will form a unit with the body. I will not feel pain even if my body is hurt, but I will only be perceived by intelligence just as a crew sees something broken on his ship.

One of the most famous arguments of René Descartes is not only from his first meditation, but also from his meditation, his dream argument. Descartes thinks there is no way to distinguish between being awake and being in a state of dreams. In fact, you may actually be in your dream. Descartes' interesting Though people can not distinguish between awakening and dreams, sometimes it can be a bit complicated and can be added to some of my contradictions theory, Descartes dream argument is one of the propositions I could not bring myself to get the kind. "I am convinced that I am standing; I am absolutely sure; I am not a small opportunity." - G. E Moore. Rene Descartes introduces a dream argument that we believe that we can not trust a sense because we believe that what happens in that dream is a reality, dreaming in someone's life. did. This argument opposed G.E Moore using evidence and knowledge reversing the dream argument. He discovered that Descartes' statement is very contradictory. One of the most famous arguments of René Descartes is not only from his first meditation, but also from his meditation, his dream argument. Descartes thinks there is no way to distinguish between being awake and being in a state of dreams. In fact, you may actually be in your dream. Descartes' interesting Though people can not distinguish between awakening and dreams, sometimes it can be a bit complicated and can be added to some of my contradictions theory, Descartes dream argument is one of the propositions I could not bring myself to get the kind. In this breakthrough 1641 publication, René Descartes proved that in addition to the assumed problems of our dreams, we can not convey the difference between reality and fantasy. Descartes' discussion of "How do you know that you are not dreaming" is still one of the most reliable examples of undoubted philosophical evidence. Today, I believe people are probably very vivid dreamers in addition to logical power. In fact, his shrink will tell him that he has a very active temporoparietal - the brain's information center, the parietal junction, every night at the brain's "High dreamer calls" We will hold a party. (Ruby, 2014)

Through doubt and doubt, Descartes cast an easy and complicated question. Shocked by all the lies he believed, Descartes certainly began to rationally decide what could exist without a doubt. Descartes doubts everything so that his customary view and false knowledge do not hinder the ability to truly perceive things. As far as the body is concerned, our senses tell us that when the ligament outside the body and the substance together create the body. However, when we are skeptical and suspicious of all previous knowledge, we can not prove that our physical existence is deceived by our sense. Even if there is a suspicion of existence ... more content After the wax melted, all the waxes (their color, taste, fragrance) were removed, but the idea of ​​wax remained. But our wisdom, our only reasoning and understanding ability will tell us that it is the same wax. We know that it is the same wax after it melts, but the flame makes it look different from it. If solids and dissolved waxes are the same, how does intelligence know this? Descartes concluded that his ability to understand wax is not only through sensations acquired by the body but also from his own intelligence inference and understanding. In order to judge what is certain, we must doubt all previous knowledge and beliefs. With doubt on everything, the sensation gained by the body becomes unreliable, and all remaining emotions are reliable nature of thought and intelligence. In order for us to understand through sensation, we must have ideas. The belief that thinking exists enables self creation, the power of intelligence and thinking. The difference between self, thinking ability, and everything else is that it is beyond doubt. Contrary to Descartes, Buddhist philosophy refuses to accept the concept of self. According to Buddhism, there is a self that means there is a part that you can control. So, I am not saying "I do not think that I am thinking like this". Rene Descartes says "About methodology" (Cartesian 1637). I think it is quite obvious as I think I will exist. Through our thinking, we provide evidence of our existence. But Jill Bolte Taylor added her idea to TED.com's purely right-brain video demonstration "I do not think so". Neuroanatomist Jill Voltte Taylor provides a detailed, sometimes emotional explanation René Descartes, an early modern philosopher who invented analytical geometry, says: In fact, this is not a good technical translation. Descartes means "I am closer, because I am thinking." Certainty: How to implement it and when you know it. In the long history of philosophical discourse, most philosophers try to find out what they believe is convincing, that everyone should agree regardless of their political or other status did. "I think that I like this" The famous introduction of René de Carte is the basis of his dualism theory. Mixture of thinking and body, or materials of expansion and thought, tells the thought of Descartes 'real human'. Descartes' thought that the body is completely independent from the heart is called mechanical view. Descartes's interest in "thinking about yourself" is the first and important step in the transition from metaphysics to epistemology in modern philosophy. He realized the necessity of orderly thought, and he called it a method. The phrase "I think so," or "Cogito ergo sum" may make Descartes the most cited philosopher in the past 400 years. French theory - if I am thinking, I must also exist - is the foundation of modern philosophy. For Descartes, Cogito forms the basis of all other knowledge. In the depth of contemplation, Cogito is the truth decided when Descartes doubts everything. But since Descartes, suspicion has expanded. David Hume and Emanuel Kant asked me what I thought about "me", so I did. Because I have "I", did not you think that happened? Perhaps we should say that it is "thinking" as we said "rain", and say that "I" is right behind this idea.

Review of Descartes' 2nd Meditation Our text editors, Baird and Kaufman, first discovered and decided certainty in the way philosophical studies were conducted by philosophers in their Descartes epistemological overview , Inferring other people can be convinced of the meaning. If he is not completely satisfied with himself (ie not being told by others), he will not admit that this is a refutable fact. My paper is about Rene de Carte's second meditation. In the second meditation, the famous motto of Rene Descartes is "Cogito, Ergo Sum" or "I think this is my favorite" and as I am also, I think the concepts and ideas presented by Rene Descartes I analyzed and decided to criticize. Finding his second meditation is the most controversial and interesting thing in his meditation. The second meditation is the most controversial meditation in Descartes meditation. Because his first question method is explicitly introduced. And this is also his idea of ​​getting radical, because it shows that every kind of knowledge must be criticized and that people have to doubt everything, including himself. Review of Descartes' 2nd Meditation Our text editors, Baird and Kaufman, first discovered and decided certainty in the way philosophical studies were conducted by philosophers in their Descartes epistemological overview , Inferring other people can be convinced of the meaning. - Summary of meditation in philosophical lesson: This paper considers that teachers of philosophy teach students with simple meditation techniques, consistent with the overall theme of the "philosophical teaching humanity" conference We propose.

C. Santos Prof. R. Boeker Deadline of the heart and the world On October 18, 2013 Descartes presented three skeptical arguments in his meditation. And he had reason to doubt all his sensory beliefs. Descartes is ultimately aiming to get rid of all bad beliefs. Pursuit of his certainty arises from his belief that our belief system is based on unreasonable basic beliefs and convinces him that all his other beliefs are uncertain I will. His way of implementing the system from error is explained in three steps of meditation 1. My paper is about Rene de Carte's second meditation. In the second meditation, René Descartes' famous motto is "Cogito, Ergo Sum" or "I think I like this", as I also do. Finding his second meditation is the most controversial and interesting thing in his meditation. The second meditation is the most controversial meditation in Descartes meditation. Because his first question method is explicitly introduced. And this is also his idea of ​​becoming extreme, because all sorts of knowledge must be criticized and people have to doubt everything, including himself. It is human beings who wonder if we have a purpose in this world, casting doubt on our origin. Rene Descartes tried to answer these questions by examining himself and God through meditation. In meditation II, Descartes recognizes and understands thinking, so I think that my opinion is positive. Many of his problems led him from certainty to the next problem. As his claim is deemed correct, the explanation for these ideas is obvious. - Mindfulness meditation is the growth people are aware of today, some people say it is a unique way to overcome anxiety and discover greater wisdom in our minds think. People who practice this meditation will try to remove unnecessary ideas, focus on existing ideas, and focus on attention and breathing. Some modern psychotherapists suggest that we can train our minds by practicing mindfulness meditation. Descartes believes knowledge comes from thought. This is an obvious fact that can be obtained through personal reflection. While seeking true knowledge, Descartes wrote his six meditations. In these meditations, Descartes will try to build a solid foundation that can build all knowledge. In the first meditation, Descartes began to develop this foundation with suspicion. He doubts all his earlier ideas, including "absolutely sure, no doubt, this information seems to be obviously wrong". (Descartes, p. 75, para.3) Faith in faith. Suspect, he c

Proof of the existence of the Descartes God The purpose of my article is to verify Descartes' assertions about the existence of God. First, I will consider the evidence of the existence of the Descartes God. Then I will study the reason why Descartes prove the existence of God. I will also discuss some of the influences of God's existence. Finally, I will point out some of the complexities and problems in the evidence. The basic problem of most religions in the world was that they were supposed to be faithful; this is a person who can not be understood by believing religion. The purpose of this paper is to study Descartes' discussion about the existence of God. First I will consider the evidence of the existence of the Descartes God. Then I will discuss the reason why Descartes prove the existence of God. We also discuss some of the influences of the existence of God. Finally, I will point out some complications and problems in the evidence. The main problem of most religions in the world was that they presupposed faith; this is a person who can not be understood as believing religion. The main evidence of the existence of God in any particular religion is that the Bible tells us about his existence and power - whatever it is. Then we just believe these scriptures. Because we think they come from God. This is a circulation theory and can not be used as evidence. The purpose of this paper is to investigate Descartes' discussion about the existence of God. First, I will consider the evidence of the existence of the Descartes God. Then I will discuss some of the influences of God's existence. Finally, I will point out some of the complexities and problems in the evidence. Evidence of the existence of Descartes' God occurred in the third meditation. He proved his entire claim in the previous meditation, and he must exist for him to think. From this observation, Descartes realized that the concept of his existence is very clear and clear in his mind; based on this clarity and the fact that he just decided his existence, he Derived the rules Unique things are genuine. Descartes begins his proof by dividing "thinking" into four categories - thought (concept), will (choice), emotion (desire)! ... Descartes proved the existence of God as soon as possible. However, Descartes does not know that this evidence does not contain errors unless he believes his clear and independent understanding of the step of reasoning is justifiable. Therefore, the clarity and standard of independent recognition,

Skeptical arguments and reactions to Descartes 'Bouwsma and Malcolm In this article, I will study René Descartes' skeleton and its reaction to O.K. Bouwsma and Norman Malcolm Bouwsma and Malcolm argued against criticism of certain parts of Descartes' claim, but I will prove that this is not enough to refute the whole. In order to understand Descartes' argument and sometimes radical view, we need at least a general understanding of the motivation for discussion. Descartes' idea sometimes seems radical or extreme, and his argument has been challenged many times. The two special criticisms we discussed were UK 's Descartes evil genius. Norman Malcolm has regained knowledge with Bouwsma. I would like to study the point of their criticism and then why I would like to discuss what each discussion seems to be harmful but insufficient to refute the discussion of Descartes. The criticism of Bouwsma focuses on Descartes' idea of ​​creating a bad genius in a fantastic world. His purpose is to prove that Descartes' fantasies and fraud are misleading. First, Bouwsma defined 'fantasies' and began to show how they were discovered. To achieve this goal, he raised an example of an evil genius who turned the world and everything into paper. In this article, I will study René Descartes' suspicion and reaction to Britain. Bouwsma and Norman Malcolm Bouwsma and Malcolm argued against criticism of certain parts of Descartes' claim, but I will prove that this is not enough to refute the whole. In order to understand Descartes' argument and sometimes radical view, we need at least a general understanding of the motivation for discussion. The 17th century was an era of advancement of science, the prosperous scientific community was interested in establishing consistent standards to define what science is. Their science is based on a combination of experience and experience, and ideally there is no prejudice to contaminate the results. However, Descartes believes that the sensation is unreliable, and that science based only on sensory information is uncertain. Descartes skepticism - Descartes skepticism - Descartes skepticism - Descartes skepticism - Descartes skepticism - Descartes skepticism - Descartes skepticism - Descartes skeptical argument - Descartes skeptical argument - Descartes Skeptical argument - Descartes skeptical argument - Descartes skeptical argument - Descartes skeptical argument

Descartes argues that "Cogito ergo sum" deviates largely from the philosophy of his era. Beginning with the basic principles of rationalism, he concluded that "I, therefore, I think it exists." In his meditation II, Descartes reached the zero point of epistemology. Here, Descartes started his amazing view. "So it was reflected very well, and we examined everything carefully, when will we finally propose psychological understanding?" In this statement he said that his own After confirming the existence, he came to the conclusion that he was his own - thoughtful thing, that is, heart, understanding or rationality - It is abstract. When Descartes used consciousness to define thinking, Descartes provided one of the first purely psychological uses of the concept of consciousness. However, he did not analyze this concept. Instead, he uses this concept to prove his cognitive assertion in meditation. However, his way of using this concept means analysis. Conscious thinking is a state of mind that is voluntarily imposed in some way. According to Descartes, all ideas have this basic attribute. Thinking - Thinking is the main attribute of thought. Descartes' definition of thought is very extensive. It includes all spiritual manipulations such as imagination, perception, reasoning, belief, hope, doubt, desire, motivation and so on. There is controversy about the criterion of thought. Many philosophers believe that Descartes believes consciousness is a sign of thinking. Others believe that Descartes defines thinking as a representative one. However, others believe that Descartes believes that the idea is determined by the combination of these two standards. Naturally, Descartes has a different meaning from "Hume". In the context of denying that it is an animal, Descartes seems to think that the word represents the present idea, that is, entertainment, thought idea, or a sudden idea (Malcolm 1973). Of course, ordinary adults express their thoughts through declarative remarks; declarative speech shares some important features with the current idea. For example, both have a propositional content, neither of which is irrelevant to the stimulus (that is, thinking can happen to a person and produce declarative speech completely unrelated to what happens in human direct environmental perception) Neither is dependent on behavior (that is, the idea may happen to humans and may generate declarative remarks that are not related to current behavior or needs).

RenéDescartes does not refuse perception, but some think that RenéDescartes considers feelings to be on the heart, not the body. Descartes argues that it is easier to understand one's idea than to know his body. To support this idea, he raised examples of waxes observed in solid and liquid form. After pointing out the difficulty of understanding the nature of wax by relying on the senses of the body, he stated as follows. RenéDescartes usually thinks that the outdated concept is the practical ability of the human brain as a consensus of emotions. French philosophers did not completely reject his inner feelings from the scholar's philosophy. But he was far from the concept of Aristotle's commonsense teacher and completely abandoned his passion for his soul (1649). People such as Gassendi and Hobbes exceeds Descartal to a certain extent, but refuses Aristotle and refuses to interpret something other than problems and movements, including determination of sensory perception like animals. Difference between independent common sense and humanity Descartes holds thoughts and denials from Aristotle. Contrary to Descartes, Descartes says "Virtual sensory expressions will discover that they may never be accepted in the mind field" René Descartes thinks that feelings are not on the body but on the heart. Descartes argues that it is easier to understand one's idea than to know his body. To support this idea, he raised examples of waxes observed in solid and liquid form. After pointing out the difficulty of understanding the essence of wax according to the senses of the body, he advocated the idea that the error is not a sort of vision, touch or imagination. ... I only check the soul (verse 31). 1 This sentence may be the most direct description of the author's thesis on this subject. RenéDescartes (1596-1650) The theory of "dynamic" particle theory has much in common with Atmism, and in a sense it is considered to be a different version. Descartes believes that all of the material in the universe is made up of small material vortices. Like an ancient Atomist, Descartes insists that emotions such as taste and temperature are caused by the shape and size of microscopic substances. The main difference between atomism and Descartes concept is the existence of voids. For him, vacuum may not exist and particles move through other substances, so all substances are constantly rotating to prevent weakness. Another important difference between Descartes 'view and classical Atomism is Descartes' thinking / body duality, which provides a divine independent existence field for thought, soul, and most importantly God . The concept of Gassendi is close to classical Atomism, but there is no atheistic overtone

Descartes believes knowledge comes from thought. This is an obvious fact that can be obtained through personal reflection. While seeking true knowledge, Descartes wrote his six meditations. In these meditations, Descartes will try to build a solid foundation that can build all knowledge. In the first meditation, Descartes began to develop this foundation with suspicion. He doubts all earlier ideas, including "not entirely certain but undoubtedly (and what seems like obvious mistakes)". (Descartes, p. 75, 3) If Descartes removes all convictions suspected of being in doubt, The contemplation of Rene Descartes' first philosophy is considered to be one of the most important works of modern philosophy. John Rock, Immanuel Kant, and numerous other philosophers have shown most of the reaction to Descartes. However, there is a serious doubt about the main argument of this paper. In opposing opinion and correspondence, philosopher Antoine Arnauld raised the question whether Descartes made circular reasoning. In Rene Descartes, the first philosophy of meditation, Descartes uses a wax test to try to prove that things exist in this world. In this article we will explain how we judge the existence of things and what can be perceived by wax. As Rene de Carte began to explain about wax, he can prove to us the changes that will occur in his experiment. "Let's take a look at this wax, for example, I just got out of the cell and did not lose all honey." In the first meditation Descartes thought of the first philosophy, he began to doubt the four beliefs. These beliefs are as follows. The existence of a person's own body, the existence of other bodies / things, mathematical knowledge, and God. Each of these beliefs is based on extreme allegations. Through the fundamental process, Descartes then ascertains whether each belief is there. The first thing that Descartes thought was to judge whether the body was there. He said that some of the facts we currently have will be realized through our senses. But our sense sometimes causes us to misunderstand us wrong conclusions about specific things and situations. In order to prove that sensation is misleading, Descartes leads the reader to "dream arguments". He explained what she might feel when she was dreaming. Interpretation and abstract of Essay.com/ Descartes 'first philosophical considerations' first and second considerations Descartes 'First Meditation and Interpretation and Summary of Descartes' First Meditation and Second Meditation in "First Philosophical Meditation"

The certainty of Descartes and the existence of God Descartes, Pascal, and Pascal of the rationalism creed insist that we can only know through the heart, Descartes said that we can know the existence of God reliably I will make you believe. In this article we compare their theoretical factors and accent them. Descartes knows the order of the universe. He proves this with a certain truth. To derive these truths, everything Descartes doubts, in particular, authoritarian knowledge. Descartes and the existence of God Descartes will be built on the truth if you realize that he can know that it is true that "I am" is the truth. After Descartes proves its existence, people will consider the truth about the essence of God, evidence of the existence of God, and the nature of material objects. The main task in Descartes' meditation is to design a system that allows him to understand the truth. He wants to lay the foundation of all further philosophy Because Descartes tries to prove the existence of God and shows that there is no doubt that something is outside. He is looking for a definite certainty, the foundation on which he can base on all his beliefs and know that they are true. Descartes' overall project is to find a definite certainty that he can be based on all his knowledge and beliefs. Descartes used his doubt to attack the principles that support everything he believes. The way of doubt is Descartes' basic question method and he doubts there is something there is no reason to doubt. Please think about that. Almost everything you think is true comes from a sense. However, senses sometimes deceive. It is unreasonable to completely trust them because the senses are not completely reliable.

DESCARTE: The source of knowledge Rene Descartes is a 17th century French philosopher who believes that the origin of knowledge comes from thinking and that there is no doubt that facts can be gained through personal reflection. His methodology (1637) and contemplation (1641) include his important philosophical theory. In order to extend mathematical methods to human knowledge in all fields, Descartes abandoned the authoritarian academic philosopher system and began extensive allegations. From the grounds to the conclusion After examining the origin of Descartes metaphysics, this paper will question the contradiction of the Cartesian law. Rene Descartes started his investigation by doubting all sorts of knowledge, and he further believed that things that might be suspected were completely wrong. Why is the idea of ​​perfection perfect indefinitely come true using Descartes' method? If infinitely perfect God's thought doubts how he can infer the existence of God from this suspicious thinking? My paper is about Rene de Carte's second meditation. In the second meditation, René Descartes' famous motto is "Cogito, Ergo Sum" or "I think I like this", as I also do. Finding his second meditation is the most controversial and interesting thing in his meditation. The second meditation is the most controversial meditation in Descartes meditation. Because his first question method is explicitly introduced. And this is also his idea of ​​getting radical, because it shows that every kind of knowledge must be criticized and that people have to doubt everything, including himself. Rene de Carte (1596 - 1650) Rene de Carte is a French philosopher and mathematician. Descartes made a great contribution to the philosophy of rationalism. Descartes' meditation is epoch-making. Because he doubts the previous belief and is trying to prove their validity through logic. Later empiricists opposed Descartes' method, but his philosophy broke many topics for further discussion. Descartes has been proved to be "the existence of God", but his doubt was an important step in promoting the reasons over faith. Descartes also made an important discovery in geometry, calculus and mathematics analysis.

If Descartes "proves" one's own existence through cohort's argument and recognizes that one's own is the essence of thinking, he must look to the research of the world around him. But before doing so, he thought he would study the problem of the existence of God better. If he could prove that he was created by a completely merciful Creator, God placed these ideas on not a crook and in Descartes, so his natural idea is the same You must tell the truth. From his hypothesis, it is clear that his idea proves his existence. Then he discussed the existence of God. According to Descartes' philosophical point of view, God created the two essentials that make up the whole reality. One is to think about substances and thoughts and the other is to extend substances and objects. In the field of physiology, Descartes believes that part of the blood is a subtle liquid. As he believes it comes in contact with the thought substance in the brain and flows out along the nerve channel which makes the muscle and other parts of the body vivid. According to Descartes, when two substances are present separately from each other, the two substances are certainly distinguished. Therefore, Descartes believes that God is different from humans, human body and mind are different from each other. He thinks that the big difference between the body (expanded one) and the mind (unexpanded, unimportant) makes two of the ontologies different. But the heart is completely indivisible. Because, "When thinking about the mind or thinking about something, I can not distinguish any part of myself, I understand that I am very single and complete." According to Descartes, everything we have is a natural idea. She believes that there is a merciful God who provides us with the senses and thoughts we can not deceive. By proving that God exists in her meditation, God is not a con artist, so we prove that everything we know is clearly true (Descartes, 2008). She applied even more complete laws of reality, and it stated that in order to create something the Creator must have more reality than God creates to put her ideals in her (Cartier , 2008). Since God is most realistic, then we can rely on our emotions to achieve. Therefore, through Descartes' philosophy, we can prove that the world we are experiencing is reality and not the dream of living in Plato caves or the life trapped in the matrix. Second argument about the existence of God. Because Descartes believes the existence is perfect, it can become a predicate to God. First, I will explain what the ontological argument of the existence of God is. Next, I will explain why Descartes decided to incorporate God into his philosophical approach. As a predicate of God existence reveals some truth about God. Ontology seeks to prove the existence of God from a transcendental point of view

Charles Earrings believes that "People can understand natural tools and things only by language, logic, practical signs." (Kremer) Descartes wants us to doubt. It is caused by irritation. "The function of thinking is to create beliefs after being stimulated by doubt." The influence of thinking, that is, beliefs, includes customs and faith is "behavior" because habits are "rules of behavior" . "Pearce's custom is using scientific methods instead of creating new methods like Descartes. Therefore, in the opinion of Peirce, Descartes did not "doubt" really believe what he believed, especially God. No doubt, some scholars object. For example, Huck wrote that the Descartes approach is different from the approach Pierce uses, does not require Pierce to assert that it is impossible and that person voluntarily begins people's first We begin to question our beliefs. "The pale of paper" goes back to "philosophical doubt" (as opposed to "heart suspicion"), and thinks that the former is not inappropriate in philosophy. In the sense of "pretend to be hesitant", Descartes doubts the existence of God, see Peirce vs. Descartes Mark. Criticism of Sim Descartes founder René Descartes ignored all beliefs, ideas, ideas, and materials. He showed that his reasoning and inference of knowledge may be wrong. Sensory experience as the main knowledge mode is often wrong and must be questioned. For example, what people see is probably an illusion. There is nothing to prove that it is impossible. In a nutshell, if there is a way to deny a belief, the reason is not enough. In this way, Descartes has proposed two arguments: a dream and a devil. Descartes' discussion is an epistemological argument. It casts doubt on the nature, limitations and validity of human knowledge. Descartes is not exploring the essence of reality, but doubts his own knowledge and interpretation of reality. Using methodological skepticism, Descartes doubts whatever may be suspected to lay the foundation for true knowledge. In epistemology, most of the knowledge we got is enough to explain the world, but there is no "absolute" truth. Descartes' goal is to build knowledge on a solid foundation - the scientific revolution is ongoing and Descartes thinks whether things have sufficient basis for pretending to be human beings things like this: If you believe that your precious others are loyal to you, well-known common friends promise you so you can later remind that your friend is a sickly liar I will discover. Alternatively, consider the standard meaning that the DNA laboratory does not need to maintain accurate results. All conclusions based on the results of this lab are questioned. Descartes will try to guarantee there is no such problem in the source of our knowledge. If there is any, it questions everything

In Rene Descartes, the first philosophy of meditation, Descartes uses a wax test to try to prove that things exist in this world. In this article we will explain how we judge the existence of things and what can be perceived by wax. As Rene de Carte began to explain about wax, he can prove to us the changes that occur in his experiment. "Let's take a look at this wax, for example, I just got out of the cell and did not lose all honey." The contemplation of Rene Descartes' first philosophy is considered to be one of the most important works of modern philosophy. John Rock, Immanuel Kant, and numerous other philosophers have shown most of the reaction to Descartes. However, there is a serious doubt about the main argument of this paper. In opposing opinion and correspondence, philosopher Antoine Arnauld raised the question whether Descartes made circular reasoning. In Rene Descartes, the first philosophy of meditation, Descartes uses a wax test to try to prove that things exist in this world. In this article we will explain how we judge the existence of things and what can be perceived by wax. As Rene de Carte began to explain about wax, he can prove to us the changes that will occur in his experiment. "Let's take a look at this wax, for example, I just got out of the cell and did not lose all honey." In the first meditation Descartes thought of the first philosophy, he began to doubt the four beliefs. These beliefs are as follows. The existence of a person's own body, the existence of other bodies / things, mathematical knowledge, and God. Each of these beliefs is based on extreme allegations. Through the fundamental process, Descartes then ascertains whether each belief is there. The first thing that Descartes thought was to judge whether the body was there. He said that some of the facts we currently have will be realized through our senses. But our sense sometimes causes us to misunderstand us wrong conclusions about specific things and situations. In order to prove that sensation is misleading, Descartes leads the reader to "dream arguments". He explained what she might feel when she was dreaming. Interpretation and abstract of Essay.com/ Descartes 'first philosophical considerations' first and second considerations Descartes 'First Meditation and Interpretation and Summary of Descartes' First Meditation and Second Meditation in "First Philosophical Meditation"

A contemplation in his third meditation of Rene Descartes' first philosophy, Rene Descartes' book 'First Philosophy Contemplation' examines Descartes' discussion about the existence of God. The purpose of this paper is to explore Descartes' inference and proof of the existence of God. In the third meditation, Descartes presented two arguments to prove the existence of God, a trademark argument and a traditional cosmological argument. His claims are powerful and relatively realistic, but they do not prove the existence of God. The contemplation of Rene Descartes' first philosophy is considered to be one of the most important works of modern philosophy. John Rock, Immanuel Kant, and numerous other philosophers have shown most of the reaction to Descartes. However, there is a serious doubt about the main argument of this paper. - Imagine your culture being thrown aside and new culture taught to you. How do you respond? In this story, the author, Jamaica Kinkade talks about her reaction to her and her experience. The writer grew up where British colonial rule took place. She grew up in a small island in the Caribbean, Antigua. She talked about England in her life, this is the place she has never seen before. In the first meditation Descartes thought of the first philosophy, he began to doubt the four beliefs. These beliefs are as follows. The existence of a person's own body, the existence of other bodies / things, mathematical knowledge, and God. Each of these beliefs is based on extreme allegations. Through the fundamental process, Descartes then ascertains whether each belief is there. The first thing that Descartes thought was to judge whether the body was there. He said that some of the facts we currently have will be realized through our senses. But our sense sometimes causes us to misunderstand us wrong conclusions about specific things and situations. In order to prove that sensation is misleading, Descartes leads the reader to "dream arguments". He explained what she might feel when she was dreaming. Interpretation and abstract of Essay.com/ Descartes 'first philosophical considerations' first and second considerations Descartes 'First Meditation and Interpretation and Summary of Descartes' First Meditation and Second Meditation in "First Philosophical Meditation"

(A) Descartes' first meditation is sometimes called doubt and attempts to abandon everything he knows about reality and existence. People may want to know the meaning of adopting this skeptical mindset, but it only leads to a lot of confusion and some kind of embarrassment. But it is fair to carefully consider the arguments before criticizing it. Therefore, it is intended to weaken what kind of information, and it explains Descartes's "devil" thinking experiment about how it accomplishes all his knowledge, opinions, and beliefs as a mistaken task To do. French philosopher René Descartes was known for his motto in the 16th century. "So, I think so." He believes that animals have no consciousness, no thought and no pain. According to Descartes, they are "automatic machines" and are simply complex machines. In fact, his view was later used to prove the practice of animals' living solutions for centuries. Even Kant believes that human rational autonomy will make them superior. Infants, Alzheimer's disease patients, developmental disorders, etc. may be considered to lack reasonable autonomy. In any case, personality is not a standard of definition that is regarded as an object of ethical consideration. In my opinion, the problem to consider is whether Kant is just a speciesist, as the singer criticizes. Descartes suggested that all our experiences are merely an ongoing dream. That means that everything we know and understand as "real" is fake. In this article, first of all, Descartes attempts to deny the concept of knowledge through this thought experiment. Secondly, I will show how he answers the questions raised through his assumption. Finally, I will explain how the movie "Matrix" helps people recognize the relevance of Descartes thought experiments. Descartes realized that he had to destroy all the experiments he had with the suspected boy who entered him to take this idea seriously. If I doubt what he is thinking, how can he take his idea seriously? He did this by locking himself to achieve his own idea. After he was over, he started meditation. He started discussing with a strange thought; dreaming and what is this? He first saw things around him

Skeptical and Cartesian way In his first meditation, Descartes revealed every misunderstanding he got with amazing clarity and perseverance and decided what he really knew. In order to get rid of these "rotten apples", he developed a method of doubt to establish a fundamental belief without doubt. In addition to these, Descartes applies three levels of skepticism, which creates three levels. At that level, our thoughts may be fooled by mistakes. Organized suspicion has nature, but you do not need to think that knowledge is impossible to apply the method of doubt. Indeed, Descartes tried to apply the doubt method to his own existence. And it proved his famous saying "Cogito, Ergo Sam" (I therefore think so). In other words, Descartes tried to doubt his existence, but even his doubt proved that he showed that he was present as he was unable to doubt whether he did not exist. Both Montaigne and Descartes Montaigne and Descartes use a philosophical approach that focuses on using doubts to discover themselves and the world around them. But they are doubting different things. Descartes doubts all his previous knowledge, and Montagne suspects that knowledge has absolute certainty. I doubt that all of them are beginning their philosophical process, but Montagne suspects the constant and static self and Descartes doubts everything is present, and Descartes is undoubtedly sure I can overcome this doubt in order to find sex. "I'm often wondering what is true or true? Descartes ... Read more Descartes used his doubt to attack the principles that support everything he believes. The way of doubt is Descartes' basic question method and he doubts there is something there is no reason to doubt. Please think about that. Almost everything you think is true comes from a sense. However, senses sometimes deceive. It is unreasonable to completely trust them because the senses are not completely reliable. But if we assume that our senses are all wrong to us, this is a small belief. In fact, it seems absurd to say such a thing. Still, as Descartes pointed out, we often have the dream that everything we experience is a fiction of our imagination, or at least not a physical one. Therefore it is reasonable to temporarily doubt that our senses convey everything to us.

Rene Descartes and Paul Church Land are respected philosophers who differ in their physical and mental relationship. Descartes has done a lot of wonderful achievements in his era, but when he wrote "first philosophical meditation" he seemed to be too crazy. His view is too intense and pessimistic, as Churchill's view in Churchill 's "negative materialism" view seems comfortable and bright. Rene de Carte is a famous French philosopher, mathematician and scientist. Since he is working on geometric algebra, we now have Cartesian geometry. My paper is about Rene de Carte's second meditation. In the second meditation, the famous motto of Rene Descartes is "Cogito, Ergo Sum" or "I think this is my favorite" and as I am also, I think the concepts and ideas presented by Rene Descartes I analyzed and decided to criticize. Finding his second meditation is the most controversial and interesting thing in his meditation. The second meditation is the most controversial meditation in Descartes meditation. Because his first question method is explicitly introduced. And this is also his idea of ​​getting radical, because it shows that every kind of knowledge must be criticized and that people have to doubt everything, including himself. Rene Descartes and Paul Church Land are respected philosophers who differ in their physical and mental relationship. Descartes has done a lot of wonderful achievements in his era, but when he wrote "first philosophical meditation" he seemed to be too crazy. His view is too intense and pessimistic, as Churchill's view in Churchill 's "negative materialism" view seems comfortable and bright. Rene de Carte is a famous French philosopher, mathematician and scientist. - ... Not all of these students will get painful due to stress, but we also need to consider that these students may have doubts or weaknesses. Beginning as enthusiasm for helping humans, it can be a way to eventually get a weekly salary; a temporary possibility is that future nurses in the country will see their patients as mere income sources That means that. In any other field, this may not be a bad thing.

Bouwsma's illegal genius intention Bouwsma's article says that the 'evil genius' creates two situations by which two attempts are made to exploit his explicit purpose, that is, his power to achieve fraud Criticize Descartes to create a situation. Bouwsma easily recognizes the existence of "four or five distinct and unique ideas" and continues to show that evil genius can deceive others, especially others about perception. The criticism of Bouwsma focuses on Descartes' idea of ​​creating a bad genius in a fantastic world. His purpose is to prove that Descartes' fantasies and fraud are misleading. First, Bouwsma defined 'fantasies' and began to show how they were discovered. To achieve this goal, he raised an example of an evil genius who turned the world and everything into paper. "It is an illusion," Bouwsma said. "It sounds like anything else, or it sounds like something else, you mistake it for something else." You can see "Tom" to the reader. Because he touches the difference between the real world and the paper genius and recognizes it. An evil genius tried to create a real world with paper, but when he realized the difference between paper flowers and real flowers, Tom saw the illusion. Bouwsma's article states that devils in his first philosophical meditation, by creating two situations where "genius of evil" attempts to use his powers to express their explicit purpose, fraud Criticizing Descartes against misuse of. Bouwsma easily recognizes the existence of "four or five distinct and unique ideas" and continues to show that evil genius can deceive others, especially others about perception. The main point of Bouwsma 's approach to this approach is to express his view that Descartes' assumption that one person might be misled by the devil is contradictory. Bouwsma's second "adventure", once there is no way ... show more Let's say that after the story of Bouwsma's "Descartes Genius" it was a broken spirit a genius got on. After destroying almost everything in the universe, he failed in fraud and made him humiliating and lonely. But let's assume that following that is a good result. The genius rebuilds the material world that he destroyed in the attempt of deceit that he failed and moved to San Francisco. His success in proveing ​​his failure left a deep impression. And to keep his ancient technology, but due to scientific progress, he put six tanks underground. Among them are the brain, reception and transmission neurons connected to the new personal computer of Genius. Now you should not learn from genius from his lesson and you may think that it was not a deceptive way but lost his evil. I do not like it

The certainty of Descartes and the existence of God Descartes, Pascal, and Pascal of the rationalism creed insist that we can only know through the heart, Descartes said that we can know the existence of God reliably I will make you believe. In this article we compare their theoretical factors and accent them. Descartes knows the order of the universe. He proves this with a certain truth. To derive these truths, everything Descartes doubts, in particular, authoritarian knowledge. Descartes and the existence of God Descartes will be built on the truth if you realize that he can know that it is true that "I am" is the truth. After Descartes proves its existence, people will consider the truth about the essence of God, evidence of the existence of God, and the nature of material objects. The main task in Descartes' meditation is to design a system that allows him to understand the truth. He wants to lay the foundation of all further philosophy Because Descartes tries to prove the existence of God and shows that there is no doubt that something is outside. He is looking for a definite certainty, the foundation on which he can base on all his beliefs and know that they are true. Descartes' overall project is to find a definite certainty that he can be based on all his knowledge and beliefs. Descartes used his doubt to attack the principles that support everything he believes. The way of doubt is Descartes' basic question method and he doubts there is something there is no reason to doubt. Please think about that. Almost everything you think is true comes from a sense. However, senses sometimes deceive. It is unreasonable to completely trust them because the senses are not completely reliable.

As you can see from the analogy of his tree that we acknowledge his physics, contemplation of the first philosophy established Descartes' metaphysics. In philosophical principles Descartes calculates the fundamentals of physics, the first part is actually part of meditation (slightly different). "Principles" are texts that greatly influence the development of modern physics. For example, Isaac Newton (1643 - 1727) will develop his physics in response to Descartes and will use the latter as his own foil. Actually Newton's Principia (principle) may be called a tribute to Descartes' book. Therefore, even if Descartes' physics (and his metaphysics) are thought to be erroneous, it still plays an important role in the development of modern physics. Pondering the first philosophy validates Descartes' debate about the existence of God. The purpose of this paper is to explore Descartes' inference and proof of the existence of God. In the third meditation, Descartes detailed the two arguments trying to prove the existence of God, the allegation of the trademark, and the traditional cosmological argument. His claims are strong and relatively realistic, but they do not prove the existence of God. At the beginning of meditation, Descartes began to refuse This argument comes from the 17th century French philosopher René Descartes. In the epoch-making first philosophical consideration (1911), Descartes ended his meditation in a suspicious way and denied all his knowledge. How was this skeptical conclusion born? It is based on a kind of degeneracyism - totally universal degeneracy. And his argument about this shamefulness - as it is often called - an argument of evil genius (or evil devil) - may be presented in this way: you have something about Well ... well, whatever. The ... ... belief exists only in your mind, or the devil is installed there for the devil. They may be installed to deceive you: perhaps one or all of them are fakes. I can not deny what I do not believe this happened to you. Still, that might be possible. Please note that the evil genius is not even others, especially wise people.

Mind, Matter and Descartes "Cogito Ergo Sum", "So I think so", this is the representative of the logic of Rene de Carte. Descartes born in Lahei, France in 1596, studied at the Jesuit college, met the principal and childhood, and made it possible to lead a relaxed lifestyle. This richness and lack of daily responsibility gave him the opportunity to express his dissatisfaction with artificial philosophy, church philosophy, extreme skepticism in the Middle Ages and the impossibility of absolute knowledge. The dualism of Descartes' mind and matter means the concept of humanity. According to Descartes, humans are a complex existence of thought and body. Descartes prioritizes the mind and thinks that the mind can exist without the body but the body can not exist without the mind. In meditation, Descartes believes that although the mind is a substance, the body consists only of "accidents". However, he believes that the mind and body are closely related. Nature tells me through pain, hunger, thirst, etc. Together, I will form a unit with the body. I will not feel pain even if my body is hurt, but I will only be perceived by intelligence just as a crew sees something broken on his ship. Between the mind and the substance, especially between the human body and the mind. Descartes said reality involves two separate material ideas and materials. Descartes guarantees us that both are true, but they will not see either unless they perceive the behavior, and perceptual behavior has no double nature to fill the gap There is no doubt. The problem is to explain the composition of the medium or medium in which the various basic substances are related. The second relation hypothesis is that perception is directly related to reality. The first philosopher normally associated with this is John Rock (1632-1704). Locke argues that this is a blank state or slate and that all knowledge is engraved by experience. He started with philosophy and pointed out that all the principles of science derive from it. Descartes believed that "the perfection of God, the essence of reality, including the essence of mind and substance, human thought comes from natural thought, as well as the mechanized biology concept, the main attribute of God I will be able to recognize it. " In those days Descartes did not claim the difference between life and inanimate objects, but he redefined the boundary between the soul and the soul. The soul interprets conscious sense, visual and memory experience between perception and decision - making. "(Archie, 2004)

Islamic Studies is an international peer-reviewed research journal published by the Islamabad Islamic Institute in Pakistan since 1962. It publishes research papers, memos, reviews, review articles and book reviews for all Islamic studies including the Quran. , Hadith, Tough Seil, Schiller, 'Ilm al-Kalam, law, Fik, law, religion, philosophy, psychology, anthropology, sociology, culture, civilization, economics, language, literature, history, science and technology. Its contributors include some of the best scholars from all over the world. Articles and book reviews published in Islamic studies are abstracted or indexed. : Religious Science, Index · Islamic, Public Information Service (PAIS), International Documentation Report (IBR), Islamic World Book Review, Middle East Journal, ATLA Religious Database, Religious Number One (RIO) and Religious Book Review (IBRR) Islamic studies are archived in the database of JSTOR, EBSCOhost, ProQuest. It is one of the research publication journals approved by the Pakistan Higher Education Committee. "Mobile Wall" represents the period between the latest issue available in JSTOR and the latest journal. The moving wall is usually expressed in terms of age. In rare cases, since the issuer selected the "zero" mobile wall, the current problem will be made public on JSTOR as soon as it is issued. For example, if the current year is 2008 and the journal has a 5 year moving frame, you can get the 2002 article. Finally, Descartes' universal methodological allegation logically led to universal skepticism. In a system where the foundation of human reason is completely destroyed, certainty can not be obtained. When refusing to accept all suspicious things suspected as "completely wrong", he saw the limbs he was sitting in. But, in addition to these things, how does the mind try to verify its reliability? If Descartes does not rely on the simple judgment of "2 + 3 = 5" and "There are four aspects in the square" his teachers are more complicated to prove the existence of God and the infinite integrity What do you think can be presented? Montagnes, Descartes Montagnes and Descartes have used philosophical approaches focused on using doubts to discover themselves and the surrounding world. But they doubt different things. Descartes doubts all his previous knowledge from his senses, and Montagne doubts the absolute certainty of knowledge. I doubt that all of them are starting their philosophical process, but Montagne doubts the constant and static self, Descartes suspects that everything is present, and Descartes has no doubtful certainty I can overcome this doubt to find out "Do we often wonder what is true or true? Descartes ... Read more Who can say that Descartes' doubt is not completely or partially influenced by Al Ghazzari's doubt? Even if you withdraw from the influence problem, the two philosophers will still find similar terms that are similar. In other places we discussed, Descartes' Cogito 'was not completely inspired by St. Augustine, it showed that there are many similarities with the idea of ​​Ibn Sina' s' Human Hibernation ' It was. It existed in ancient times and became new in the Middle Ages. So what can you do today to stop an existing connection? You can not restrict views or opinions to limited geographical boundaries or limit their movement. The secret that was once called an atom is the common scientific knowledge of the world today.

It is relatively easy to confuse the ideas of Aristotle, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Reneshchet, but the ancient philosophy, politics and mathematics of the 18th century seem to be a very scattered theme. In relation to these differences, there are three different perspectives on common themes. That is technology. Rousseau seems to oppose technology directly, Aristotle's perspective is in the middle, it is like Rousseau, and Descartes supports technology. After reading the commentary on the origin of Rousseau's inequality, Aristotle's 'Nicomara Ethics', and Descartes 'Methodology', these conclusions can be drawn. If you have learned a course of philosophy or ethics, you may know standard thinkers, Aristotle and Plato, Kant and Hume, Descartes and Rousseau. These philosophers are one of the most influential thinkers in the modern world. They shape the foundation of individuals, population and society to establish ethical and legal norms. However, if you use only one philosophy course to satisfy your graduation requirement, you may not know the other half of the world view. Before the earliest Western philosophers breathed for the first time, the history and civilization as a whole rose, was dominated and collapsed (not to mention mothers' mothers and mothers). It is relatively easy to confuse the ideas of Aristotle, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Reneshchet, but the ancient philosophy, politics and mathematics of the 18th century seem to be a very scattered theme. In relation to these differences, there are three different perspectives on common themes. That is technology. Rousseau seems to oppose technology directly, Aristotle's perspective is in the middle, it is like Rousseau, and Descartes supports technology. - In the Nicomasian Code of Ethics, generosity is the third virtue Aristotle has investigated. He calls generous ideas directly with the meaning of wealth. As Aristotle said, generosity is an intermediate factor between waste and non-generosity, waste is excess and implied flaws. However, this virtue is not natural, generosity can be created through customs, but also requires experience and time.

Descartes is using so-called ontological arguments to prove the existence of God. St. Anselm, who lived in the 11th century, first proposed this argument. Since then, it has proved popular among many philosophers including Rene Descartes. Modern philosophers have no ontology debate anymore, but recent attempts to revive modern philosophers have been done. The Cartesian formula is considered the best because it is simple and relatively easy to follow. Discussion of Rene Descartes on the existence of God Discussion on the existence of the God of Rene Descartes is related to his rationalist deductive reasoning. Descartes concluded that there is a truth about the existence of God as the nature of God concerning the completion of God (the perfect existence that must exist to be complete). As our knowledge of human sensory data (our senses) of the product discount as a rationalist philosopher Descartes, but our knowledge gained an epistemological position that our knowledge is through our own thought process of reasoning I was supporting. The purpose of this paper is to study Descartes' discussion about the existence of God. First, I will review the evidence of the existence of Descartes' god. Next, I will discuss the reason why Descartes prove the existence of God. I will also discuss some of the results of God's existence. Finally, I will point out some of the complications and problems in the evidence. The major problems of most religions in the world are always the premise of their faith. If religious people do not believe it should not be understood as we see the huge transition of religion and other religions. The main evidence of the existence of God in any particular religion is that the Bible teaches us about our existence and power regardless of which. And I believe that we come from God, so I believe only these verses. This is a circular discussion and can not be used as evidence.

Descartes once said, "There is a big difference between body and mind." This sentence comes from the idea that Descartes believes that two substances constitute reality. In fact, Descartes' entity is called an extension or material presence, which means that it occupies space. On the other hand, it has nothing to do with thinking or thinking. This is called binomorphic metaphysics. Descartes began exploring matter and insignificant things through paradox of epistemology. This is only through epistemological analysis methods to find the truth of metaphysics. The dualism of Descartes' mind and matter means the concept of humanity. According to Descartes, humans are a complex existence of thought and body. Descartes prioritizes the mind and thinks that the mind can exist without the body but the body can not exist without the mind. In meditation, Descartes believes that although the mind is a substance, the body consists only of "accidents". However, he believes that the mind and body are closely related. Nature tells me through pain, hunger, thirst, etc. Together, I will form a unit with the body. I will not feel pain even if my body is hurt, but I will only be perceived by intelligence just as a crew sees something broken on his ship. Even in studies of mind philosophy, cognitive science, neuroscience, etc., we use Descartes' heart and body dualism as a foil. This usage is rooted in the criticism advocated by Princess Bohemian Elizabeth (1618 - 1680). She believes that when Descartes considers the real distinction between physique and body, they believe that causal interaction is impossible. After all, causal interaction can be achieved through contact; things like the body touch each other through their surface. But unless they spread, the heart can not have a surface, so the body can not touch the heart, and vice versa. Descartes proposed a discussion on separability to validate and explain his theory. His argument is that if the mind is the same as the body, whatever is true to the body and vice versa is the same for the body; but the spirit is indivisible, the body is separable, hence the spirit is body It is different. In other words, according to Descartes, the mind and body are two different things. He said, "When thinking about your own idea, in other words, when I think about myself as I am only thinking about something - I can not distinguish any part - I am single unity I understand that cutting one foot, one arm, or other limbs will not result in something getting into your head. "

Descartes 'Algebra and Descartes' Soul Comments: Biography of Knowledge and Erroneous Descartes: Emotions, Reasons, and Human Brains Paul Mills --------------------- - ------------------------------------------------------------------- - ------ Stephen Gaukroger, Descartes: Intellectual Biography. Oxford: Oxford University, 1995. 499 pages. Antonio R. Damasio, Descartes' mistake: emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: Putnam, 1995. 312 pages. Antonio Damascio tells us that Descartes' mistake is his belief in "separation of the abyss between the body and the spirit". "The manuscript is the passion of Descartes to the soul that Elizabeth brought to Elizabeth in the beginning of 1646. It is a map of the soul whether it is a human soul or a human soul Other works of Descartes - geometry and optics Technical paper on methodology, metaphysics - objective and reasoning with a new rational science style Discussion about passion is an explanation of morality as a person, a new person, or someone's sorrow and pleasure, and systematic With the defense of medical advice, he hoped to succeed in putting pressure on Elizabeth, heartily hoping to share the satisfaction feeling he likes with others, a creed. "(Prince and Philosopher, master of passion.Page .. 89) Analytic geometry combining algebra and geometry was developed in the early 17th century by Western mathematicians and French mathematicians and philosophers René Descartes. Mr. Descartes realized that any position on the plane can be described with a pair of numbers called coordinates and immediately realized that geometry can be described using the corresponding algebraic equations. In the algebra course, there is a tendency to call this "graphic". Calculus was then used as the main extension of rectangular coordinate analysis geometry of the century. The simple concept of what Descartes calls the "x-y plane" is said to be the basis for many subsequent technological progress. If we do not analyze the geometry, we may still enter the early industrial era. This is a missing link and we will be able to begin using mathematics fully to understand our material world.

The natural way and the white natural method adopted by Descartes, RenéDescartes, is quite different from the way of Gilbert White. Descartes and White have similar important ways to test nature. Descartes' deductive inference and belief mainly leads to nature approaching in his mind (body and mind). Descartes combines mathematics and logic with philosophy to explain the material world and when it becomes a theological problem it becomes metaphysical and meditates on the nature of existence and the binary nature of the mind and body and the body of the pineal gland I will decide my soul. It is a contact. This also urged to define the concept of dualism. That is to satisfy the problem of non-importance. This concept caused controversy as his previous philosophical system gave the people tools to define real knowledge. Fortunately, because Descartes himself produced a methodological skepticism, ie a Descartes doubt, all our philosophers Descartes' discussion is an epistemological argument. It casts doubt on the nature, limitations and validity of human knowledge. Descartes is not exploring the essence of reality, but doubts his own knowledge and interpretation of reality. Using methodological skepticism, Descartes doubts whatever may be suspected to lay the foundation for true knowledge. In epistemology, most of the knowledge we got is enough to explain the world, but there is no "absolute" truth. Several important issues raised by Descartes are still controversial in knowledge theory. The first question is whether to deny skepticism, and how to argue. No one has used Descartes again, but other strategies have advanced. A related question is whether there are any reasons for trying to argue against skepticism or even trying. One of the most important moves that Descartes did was trying to use the internal resources he found in his head as the basis for all other knowledge. Many philosophers question the starting point of the first person of this knowledge theory. Finally (for our purposes), many philosophers descartes, there is no doubt (or at least unquestionable) to make the standards too high and make skeptics work too easy We rely on necessity.

Knowledge of Descartes and Shakespeare, confidence and deception "Knowledge is power", British philosopher Francis Bacon once said 1. Knowledge is worth pursuing Of course, it is required in everyday life, thinking, and fiction. But this is dangerous. Bacon quotes definitely refer to true knowledge. But in pursuit of knowledge, we are deceived, deceived, betrayed. Then there was a challenge: to keep pursuing the knowledge that is obviously necessary in life, and to make sure we are not misunderstood. Fraud is defined as a misleading lie. There is usually a fraud when you need to hide the truth or plan to expose the truth. This word also applies to script Hamlet which Shakespeare built society based on fraud. Each character in the play is experienced or formulated in some form of fraud in order to reveal the truth and obscure the truth. Any role in the theater does not feel that it is frank and need to pursue the truth. As a result, the character feels that it is necessary to constantly deceive in order to hide past mistakes. Shakespeare shows examples of fraud in dramas such as dishonesty, ridiculous tendency, betrayal. Shakespeare ... displays more content through these fraudulent acts Fraud is helpful while having a negative meaning. This is seen in Shakespeare's play fraud application, "nothing happens". There are various examples in the play where fraud is being used to carry out positive or negative motivation. Fraud is widely used to help others cope with social life and succeed. The use of fraud as a theme of "doing nothing" helps the development of the story. Fraud as a style helps the character achieve its intended purpose and motivation. These motivations are destructive and constructive and point out the role of active and negative use of fraud. Hamlet fraud fraud is often used to gain power and success in politics and everyday life. In Shakespeare 's Hamlet, subjects of fraud are often repeated. Hamlet hesitated while killing Claudius, and the last death of Hamlet was a direct result of court fraud. Hamlet thought that he was crazy cheating everyone. He believes that this "funny character" can kill Claudius without any influence and revive his father's death. - If the two characters 'Wuthering Heights' and 'Hamlet' are the subject of revenge, both characters face revenge from different perspectives. Heathcliff is isolated, prospectively reckless, Hamlet is very open, it does not allow him to act frankly, and spends a lot of time on trial operation. The themes and methods of the two roles also make the difference bigger. In Shakespeare's Hamlet, Hamlet is seeking revenge for Claudius to kill his father.

Through Descartes' second and sixth meditation it seems that there is a tension between the fact that the body and mind are obvious. By analyzing these two kinds of meditation, Descartes' view seems to be inconsistent and needs further evaluation to reveal its true meaning. Descartes says that in the second meditation, things are perceived through different intelligence and sixth meditation. Suspicious tension. My paper is about Rene de Carte's second meditation. In the second meditation, René Descartes' famous motto is "Cogito, Ergo Sum" or "I think I like this", as I also do. Finding his second meditation is the most controversial and interesting thing in his meditation. The second meditation is the most controversial meditation in Descartes meditation. And this is also his idea of ​​getting radical, because it shows that every kind of knowledge must be criticized and that people have to doubt everything, including himself. In meditation, Descartes changed the structure of discussion. With a second meditation he decided that he could not doubt whether he thought he was, but he was able to doubt the existence of the substance. However, he explicitly refused to use this situation to conclude that his mind is different from his body because he does not yet know his personality (7: 27). And in the sixth meditation he set up a sign of truth to satisfy himself. It is an extension and we can not consider what can not be expanded (7: 78). He is not based on this argument on the fact that he can doubt the existence of either, but based on clear and unique knowledge about thought and the nature of matter.

Descartes' meditation of the first philosophy In "the mediator of the first philosophy", Descartes tried to prove the existence of God in the third meditation. He will do this by suggesting some premises that will ultimately be firm arguments. First, I will explain why Descartes raised this question and whether God exists. Why Descartes is discussing at this point in the text that he is in need of this. Next, I explain in detail the Descartes' allegiance and the circumstances leading to the conclusion that God exists. In the third mediation of René Descartes's "First Philosophy Mediation" (entitled "About the existence of God"), Descartes established the principle of whatever is clearly recognizable by natural light. It is all true, and we use it to establish the existence of God. In meditation, 2 Descartes decides his real existence (after paying attention to meditation). In meditation, Descartes pointed out that he knew that he had ideas about God in his mind and asked why he thought about it. For Descartes, a business must have as much reality as reality. Since Descartes and other limited existence are less restrictive than the reality of God, only God can cause God's thought (see the summary of another God's proof of Descartes). This means that Descartes must exist in God. If God does not exist, Descartes will wonder if he can exist with His ideas about God. So God must exist to be the reason for our existence. Pondering the first philosophy validates Descartes' debate about the existence of God. The purpose of this paper is to explore Descartes' inference and proof of the existence of God. In the third meditation, Descartes presented two arguments to prove the existence of God, a trademark argument and a traditional cosmological argument. His claims are powerful and relatively realistic, but they do not prove the existence of God. At the beginning of meditation, Descartes began to refuse Descartes was skeptical at the first two mediation. Descartes first solves radical skepticism implied by an evil devilish argument by deciding that he is intellectual essence. According to Descartes, this "I" self-view is born, we are born, even a demon can not be doubted. By contemplating the first philosophy, Descartes metaphysics was established. It recognizes his physics, as you can see from the analogy of his tree. In philosophical principles Descartes calculates the fundamentals of physics, and the first part is actually meditation meditation (slightly different). "Principles" are texts which greatly influence the development of modern physics. For example, Isaac Newton (1643-1727) will develop his physics as a reaction to Descartes and use the latter as his own foil. Actually, Newton's Principia (principle) may be called a tribute to Descartes' book. Therefore Descartes' physics (and his metaphysics) are thought to be wrong, but it plays an important role in the development of modern physics.

Interpretation of Heidegger 's Descartes dualism: The problem of traditional epistemology is the relationship between the subject and the outside world The difference between the subject and the object makes it possible to distinguish between those who have knowledge and those who know it. Starting with Descartes, the subject is something unexpanded, and this object is an extension of what he does not think. Heidegger dismisses this distinction between the subject and the object and thinks that the subject does not differ from the outside world because it is essentially in the world. Material dualism is an ontological dualism protected by Descartes, which claims to have two basic substances, spirits and substances. The spirit does not spread to the universe, and the problem can not be considered. It believes that the immortal soul occupies the area of ​​independent existence and obviously the body will die. This view contradicts physicalism. Dynamic space framework developed by Gottfried Leibniz (1646-1716). The idea behind the dynamics in metaphysical cosmology is that the material world can be explained by the movement of the distance, not by the expansion but by the positive, point-like force. Dynamically describe simple elements, Leibniz, Monas, and those that exist as a group of elements with only strong essence. It developed as a response to the passive material view of the philosophical mechanism. Material dualism (or Descartes dualism) believes that the mind is an independent matter - the mind does not spread out into space and matter can not be thought. This is the most famous type of dualism of Descartes, it is compatible with most theologians who claim that the immortal soul occupies an independent "existence region" different from the material world. Attribute dualism (also called token physics) argues that thought is a series of independent attributes that emerge from the brain, but that is not a unique substance. Thus, if the substance is organized in an appropriate way (ie in the form of a living human tissue), psychological features will appear.

Antonio Damascio told the comment on "Descartes: Biography of intelligence and Descartes's mistake: emotion, reason, and error of Descartes in the human brain" "separation of the abyss between the body and the mind." "(250). As Damascio points out, Descartes' work should have many concrete 'mistakes' - for example, heat can cause blood circulation and movements from objects through the air chamber Move to another object - the concept of the later theory "modified" in a way that we can imagine that Descartes could easily accept. In the 1994 book "Descartes: Emotions, Reason, Human Brain", neuroscientist Antonio Damcio argues that rational thinking is overly dependent and rationality requires emotional input ing. He believes that René Descartes 'mistake' is a dual separation of thought and body between reason and emotion. My curiosity to understanding "experience" transcends the concept of perception beyond thinking in various theories, psychology, sociology, anthropology, communication, myths, magic, yoga, and Native American ceremonies It leads to doing. And I will practice. I also thought about the doubts of the scientific community. I have read the fields of morphology, synesthesia and memeism to advance my understanding of experience. Through all these explorations, I understand that the way to understand experience rationally and empirically does not help us capture and understand the hidden dimensions of human life. In his book "Cartesian Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain" (first published in 1994), one of the world's top neuroscientists, Antonio Damascio, I explained. It is one of the most famous examples. Elliott was previously a successful businessman, father and husband of the model and suffered from ventral medial frontal lobe lesions due to tumor and subsequent surgical resection. After his action Elliot quietly reported that his life was collapsing to Damascio. I am still in the 97th percentile of IQ, but Elliot lacks all motivation. His marriage collapsed with all the new business he began. In his own life, Damascio noticed that Elliot was "an unimportant bystander." "He is always under control, even if he is the hero, there is no place to feel his pain, In a conversation for several hours, I have never seen a trace of emotion.

Rene Descartes's 'Contemplation of Philosophy of Philosophy' is a philosophical work composed of six things created by Descartes. Descartes was one of the first Western philosophers who tried to establish the basis of certainty of knowledge. Meditate concerns about everything that could be regarded as suspicious. Descartes explained that when he was a child he believed many mistakes. Descartes claims to have to end a wrong belief before real knowledge comes out. My paper is about Rene de Carte's second meditation. In the second meditation, the famous motto of Rene Descartes is "Cogito, Ergo Sum" or "I think this is my favorite" and as I am also, I think the concepts and ideas presented by Rene Descartes I analyzed and decided to criticize. Finding his second meditation is the most controversial and interesting thing in his meditation. The second meditation is the most controversial meditation in Descartes meditation. Because his first question method is explicitly introduced. And this is also his idea of ​​getting radical, because it shows that every kind of knowledge must be criticized and that people have to doubt everything, including himself. Rene de Carte (1596 - 1650) Rene de Carte is a French philosopher and mathematician. Descartes made a great contribution to the philosophy of rationalism. Descartes' meditation is epoch-making. Because he doubts the previous belief and is trying to prove their validity through logic. Later empiricists opposed Descartes' method, but his philosophy broke many topics for further discussion. Descartes has been proved to be "the existence of God", but his doubt was an important step in promoting the reasons over faith. Descartes also made an important discovery in geometry, calculus and mathematics analysis. The contemplation of Rene Descartes' first philosophy is considered to be one of the most important works of modern philosophy. John Rock, Immanuel Kant, and numerous other philosophers have reacted most to Descartes. However, there is a serious doubt about the main argument of this paper. - Imagine your culture being thrown aside and new culture taught to you. How do you respond? In this story, the author, Jamaica Kinkade talks about her reaction to her and her experience. The writer grew up where British colonial rule took place. She grew up in a small island in the Caribbean, Antigua. She talked about England in her life, this is the place she has never seen before.

The theme of the mind and how to know it is from the beginning. This is one of the questions that is likely to be unanswered. I learn it every day because the heart itself is so confused. One question raised by Descartes was "How do we know"? We are thinking about this problem today as well. We will ask it almost everyday, probably not in that way, but in some form. To be honest, how do you know? When Descartes began studying his idea, he would condemn all his earlier ideas and start something new. The dualism of Descartes' mind and matter means the concept of humanity. According to Descartes, humans are a complex existence of thought and body. Descartes prioritizes the mind and thinks that the mind can exist without the body but the body can not exist without the mind. In meditation, Descartes believes that although the mind is a substance, the body consists only of "accidents". However, he believes that the mind and body are closely related. Nature tells me through pain, hunger, thirst, etc. Together, I will form a unit with the body. I will not feel pain even if my body is hurt, but I will only be perceived by intelligence just as a crew sees something broken on his ship. Dualism is closely related to the idea of ​​René Descartes (1641) who believes that thought is not important, it is not spatial. Descartes clearly distinguishes consciousness and self-recognition and distinguishes it from the brain as intelligence. Therefore, he was the first person who developed physical and mental problems in the form of today's existence. Dualism is totally in contrast to various one-sidedism. Material dualism is in contrast to all forms of materialism, but material dualism can in some sense be regarded as a form of emerging materialistic or non-reducing physicalism. Rene de Carte is one of the modern philosophers who have dealt dualism widely. For Descartes, the body and the mind are different substances, and the non-physical mind has something to do with the body. Material dualism dominates Descartes' dualism. He says, "The dualism of matter is accompanied by the idea that a person's identity is formed over time by the identity of a substance, and in a version that supports the doctrine of life after death, it is this substance. Survival is often It is called "soul" and may involve a specific memory and psychological continuity that constitutes the existence of human beings. Thoughts and bodies are unique substances closely related to living people. In a nutshell, it is beyond time and space.

Philosophical thinking about the nature of morality is usually expressed by a philosopher interested in the nature of man. Among the factors that determine human behavior, the moral analysis of the concept of right and wrong often stands out. This ethic is often observed when investigating human behavior through reflection and behavioral relationships. Therefore, philosophy and ethics are important themes of the current course of Human Science 101: Reflection and Action. However, the course calendar is written as follows. The possibility of "departure" from the relationship between Augustine and Rene de Carte (or lack of relationship) is high. Sometimes people think that Augustine is a pioneer of Descartes because Augustine and Descartes highlight the knowledge of solitude and autonomy. Certainly there may be some relationship between Austin's contribution to the Western intellectual tradition and the emergence of Descartes, but it should be noted that there are obvious differences between the two thinkers - Significantly big difference. I think this anecdotal insight of Augustine's De Trinitate is sometimes overlooked in this condemnation. Augustine was settled by a series of trinity analogies, most of which were abandoned after he reached the conclusion, and eventually did not help. I think that Augustine in Volume 14 will be satisfied with the memory, understanding and love of my soul at last. Here, we strive to stand in contrast to Descartes Martin Heidegger refers to the explanation of Augustine's philosophy at several important moments in the influential work "Existence and Time". Hannah Arendt started her philosophical writing in Augustine 's concept of love, Der Liebesbegriff bei Augustin (1929). "Attempts of political limit linking Augustin's Jean Beske Elssthen and Augustine's evil concept: Augustine does not believe that evil is a demon, but it is thought that it lacks kindness and contradiction ing. Allndt ... figured out the ultimate badness that made the Holocaust ordinary. "

Trademark argument against the existence of Descartes' God (also known as causal assertion) seeks to prove the existence of God through our understanding of God. This argument depends on the definition of the cause and outcome of Descartes and he regards it as a priori. The idea that God is an infinite existence, his reason is essentially staying in our brain, as his seal and trademark is like a potter left in his flowerpot. "God put this idea into my mind in my creation, which may give the impression that workers are impressed with his work." This infinite idea is limited to human beings You must be born for the nature. Things can not appear, what is the idea? Descartes' first argument about the existence of God is called a trademark allegation. This argument points out that we all have our own ideas in our minds ("... there is a truthful and positive thought about God or my idea ... "). As the designer left a mark, God must plant this idea in our hearts. "When I think more about this, my initial thought should not be surprised if my intelligence can not figure out why God is behaving like him, because I know that It is because I do not know what the reason is and how God produces them. Discussion of Rene Descartes on the existence of God Rene Descartes's debate about the existence of God is related to his rationalistic deduction reasoning. Descartes concluded that the truth about the existence of God exists in His idea about the completeness of God and the essence of God (as a complete existence that must exist to be perfect). - All moral arguments about the existence of God are based on the principle that all of us share common sense of morality. Despite cultural differences, in a broad sense, people all over the world have ambiguous thoughts about right and wrong; a moral argument to the existence of God is that this mutual understanding is evidence of the existence of God I will say that. Immanuel Kant advocated this argument (not a moral argument); a god as a source of objective morality

In the six philosophy of the first philosophy, the French philosopher Rene Descartes tried to find a concrete foundation for a scientific foundation, and that he would include only certain beliefs without doubt I said that I can do it. He believes that less specific things are exposed to the outside world and opposed by philosophical skeptics. The significance of Descartes' reform is to force a new way of thinking. Descartes's approach starts with simplification, proposes knowledge by presenting every simple element, clear and obvious element in the process of removing all unruly knowledge, analytical and division I will. Descartes' first philosophy contemplation published in 1641 was designed for philosophers and theologians. It includes six meditations, what we might suspect, the essence of human mind, God: the existence of God, truth and error, the essence of material things, the existence of material things, and the true difference between heart and human body Including. However, many scientists, such as Arnauld, Hobbes, Gassendi, are opposed to Descartes' idea. The most comprehensive Cartesian work, Principia Philosophiae, was published in Amsterdam in 1644. In the four principles of human knowledge, material principle, visible world, and the earth, it is trying to simplify studying the universe based on mathematics. This is an important point of view, indicating future directions. Descartes do not believe in distant actions By contemplating the first philosophy, Descartes metaphysics was established. It recognizes his physics, as you can see from the analogy of his tree. In philosophical principles Descartes calculates the fundamentals of physics, and the first part is actually meditation meditation (slightly different). "Principles" are texts which greatly influence the development of modern physics. For example, Isaac Newton (1643-1727) will develop his physics as a reaction to Descartes and use the latter as his own foil. Actually, Newton's Principia (principle) may be called a tribute to Descartes' book. Therefore Descartes' physics (and his metaphysics) are thought to be incorrect, but it plays an important role in the development of modern physics. Meditation laid the foundation of Descartes philosophy. This foundation is related to the concept of the first philosophy. The metaphysical problem covered in this book contains a guarantee that we understand the truth. Making such something is important in order to be able to do science. In fact, Descartes actually said that his initial motivation is that the motive for this book is to provide a stable foundation and a foundation for science. In philosophical principles announced in 1644 three years after meditation, Descartes compared metaphysics to the root of trees. He wrote:

To the best of my knowledge, "God" is an infinite, independent, highly intelligent, very powerful material and creates everything about myself and existence. All these attributes are like this and as I concentrate on them, they do not seem to be from myself. Therefore, God must exist from what I have to say. I summarized the obvious existence of God, and my survival always depends entirely on God in my life. If you truly are a true pursuer in pursuing the truth, then you have to doubt as much as possible at least once in your life. A few years ago, I was shocked by the number of lies I accepted as a child and the very skeptical nature of the building as a whole based on them. If I wanted to build something with stable, potentially persistent science in my life, I noticed that it was necessary to completely break down everything and start with the foundation. Clearly I will act correctly and avoid mistakes unless I make judgments only when I do not fully understand the truth. It is the most generous soul, most appreciated are the people who are the most proud, the most basic and weak, and those who will dispel themselves by the most anger and hatred. Reading all good books is actually like speaking with the most noble people in the past centuries Although they are writers, they reveal their best ideas to us Carefully study It was a conversation. Rene de Carte is a French philosopher, mathematician, and scientist. Most of the late Western philosophy known as the ancestor of contemporary Western philosophy has answered his work and these works are still being studied. Born and raised in the Kingdom of France he stayed for about 20 years in the Netherlands (1629-49) after working in the Netherlands Nassau Morris Army, Prince Orange, and Federal Governor for a while. . He is often considered one of the representatives of the most famous intellectuals of the Netherlands Golden Age. Descartes' contemplation of the first philosophy remains standard text of most university philosophy departments. Descartes' influence on mathematics was equally obvious, and the Cartesian coordinate system was named after him. It is thought to be the father of analytic geometry which is a bridge between algebra and geometry to discover calculus and analysis. Descartes is also one of the important figures of the scientific revolution. The parents of RenéDescartes are Joachim Descartes (1563-1640) and Jeanne Brochard (1566-1597). Joachim was the son of a doctor Pierre Descart (1515-1566) who served as a lawyer at the Brittany Parliament in London. Jenny is the daughter of a soldier René Brochard, a member of a garrison army stationed in Poitiers. One of Jeanne's brothers, also known as RenéBrochard, became one of the two Godfathers of René Descartes and René Descartes was named after his godfather René Brochard. Jeanne's widow's mother, Jeanne Sain Brochard, lives in La Haye near the Tours and René was born in her house. Joachim and Jeanne Descartes married on January 15, 1589 and lived in Châtellerault. They have two older children. And a girl named Jeanne (born 1590) and a boy named Pierre (born 1591). At the age of 4, Rene was baptized by Roman Catholic St. George of La Hey. Rene is a bad condition now when he was a child. RenéDescartes was born on March 31, 1596 and died on February 11, 1650. RenéDescartes is a person who does a lot of things. He is a French mathematician, philosopher, and scientist. He contributed to "theoretical theory" and his "symbolic rule", but the most important contribution of Descartes to the world of mathematics was analytic geometry. Descartes contributed LaGémétrie to analytical geometry in 1637. This book is doomed to be one of the most important books in the history of mathematics. Analytical geometry is an application of algebra in geometry. This book shows that Descartes is the first variable to end with an alphabet such as x, y, z. He also uses the beginning of the letters a, b, c as argum

9). In the face of the fact that he can doubt, Descartes assumes that he is incomplete due to perfection beyond the world order and beyond human existence. This six part article has been translated from French to English from the 17th century and is used for preparing many works based on the scientific evidence of Descartes (Kraus & Hunt, 2007). Descartes enhances the reality of human beings in the most important part of discourse. French mathematician and philosopher Rene Descartes was one of the first people to counter the tacit scientific world view. At the age of 8, Descartes studied at Ange Jesuit University, La Foche, where he continued studying for eight years. He also continued to acquire a law degree in Paris and learned mathematics and dynamics under the guidance of a Dutch scientist Isaac Beeckman. Descartes is a rationalist as he believes that knowledge is achieved through reason and internal or internal thinking. He is also a faithful Catholic and lives in a rapidly growing scientific world. Therefore, Descartes is determined to prove that God exists in the world of this scientific modernization. In order to show this and other beliefs and theory, Descartes began to cast doubt on reality. Rene de Carte (1596 - 1650) Rene de Carte is a French philosopher and mathematician. Descartes made a great contribution to the philosophy of rationalism. Descartes' meditation is epoch-making. Because he doubts the previous belief and is trying to prove their validity through logic. Later empiricists opposed Descartes' method, but his philosophy broke many topics for further discussion. Descartes has been proved to be "the existence of God", but his doubt was an important step in promoting the reasons over faith. Descartes also made an important discovery in geometry, calculus and mathematics analysis.

In the movie "Silver Wings Killer", through perfect "skin work" and genetic engineering, replicas and humans are perfect. They can behave like human beings and show their ability to work. They can talk and they can have emotions and emotions. These replicators are stronger, faster and smarter than humans; however, they can only be genetically programmed within the specified 4 year lifespan. Replicons are made for use as slave labor for "non-world colonization". Rene Descartes was a French philosopher of the 17th century, traveled all over Europe and thought deeply about what made us human. His most famous phrase was repeated with a copy of "Blade Runner". As Descartes and Descartes philosopher Andrew Norris pointed out, Descartes suspects that someday it may be necessary to test whether something is human or machine. Mr. Descartes wrote: "If the machine has an image of our body and if we can imitate our behavior morally as much as possible, there are still two most definitive tests So he created his own tests and relied on language skills and flexibility in action Joi and K (from Blade Runner 2049) are good. First let's talk about Blade Runner 2049. Blade Runner 2049 is a 2017 SF movie by Dennis Villeneuve. This is a sequel to the movie "Blade Runner" (Director Ridley Scott) released in 1982. Set in the future of Los Angeles, we are talking about replicas - replicas are bioengineering people who produce only work slaves. I think that all the characters in the movie (even the holographic computer program Joi) have their own names, except for the hero's K. His "name" was repeatedly mentioned everywhere in the movie. As the story progressed, K gradually (or reluctantly) got his own name again: Joe. The end of the movie means that K accepted Joe 's name. That means he accepts that the copier should have a soul and that his existence in the world is important. The copy of K played by Ryan Gosling is a blade that kills the illegal replicator. He found a box containing the body part of the replicator who died while giving birth. This violates the sterilization theory of the replicator. With this discovery, he decided to find a journey to find a child and his father. This movie is awe-inspiring and Villeneuve can enjoy a picturesque landscape every time. Destopia There is a luxurious monument in the desert and our character sleeps at a uniform speed with black tension so we do not sleep in the ornate city. Harrison Ford returns as Deckard and feels that he has never left in many (good) ways.

Descartes: Knowledge is the truth With the arrival of the scientific revolution of the 17th century, the social and natural views of Europe have changed. There was great progress in mathematics, physics, astronomy, biology, chemistry. The world and its perspectives are changing With this change, new changes have occurred in the mind and new changes have arisen in philosophy. In addition to the ancient Greek philosophy focused on searching for orders by diversity of what is assimilated by the basic principle of the search Descartes tries to establish order through some basic division of labor. Descartes believes that knowledge of eternal truth, including mathematical truths and epistemology and metaphysical basis of science, can only be achieved for different reasons, and physical knowledge with the help of other knowledge, scientific methods, I need experience. He also believes that dreams are as realistic as sensory experiences, but these dreams can not provide people with knowledge. Furthermore, since sensuous sensory experience may cause hallucinations, the sensory experience itself may be suspicious. Therefore, Descartes concluded that a reasonable pursuit of the truth should doubt every belief about the reality of sensation. He details these beliefs in research such as "methodology", "contemplation of Philosophy first", "principle of philosophy". Descartes has developed a way to get the truth. According to it, it is possible to classify everything that intelligence (or reason) can not be recognized as knowledge. Descartes: Knowledge is the truth With the advent of the scientific revolution of the 17th century, the social and natural views of Europe have changed. There was great progress in mathematics, physics, astronomy, biology, chemistry. The world and its perspectives are changing With this change, new changes have occurred in the mind and new changes have arisen in philosophy. - Isaac Newton is an important figure of the scientific revolution since his discovery changed the world of science and belief system in many ways. His research brought this effect because I could explain why and how he prove my hypothesis and it led to a new way of thinking. Do you often wonder what is true or true? Descartes believes that all doubt of true knowledge he knows is the only way to find the truth and reality. He doubts the key principle of his philosophical approach. Descartes asks us what we truly know in the shadow of doubt. To do this, he decided to look for himself in himself (Cartesian 9). First, since he decided to doubt everything, he had to write down all the knowledge he thought he knew the truth (Descartes 13). He is blind, forced to say that the truth has a certain understanding, not knowing the truth, the knowledge he knows already, and letting himself up. Descartes decided that it is not necessary to prove that all his knowledge is wrong and that it is not necessary to prove that all his knowledge is uncertain. However, he took no time to research all aspects of his knowledge.

Through Descartes' second and sixth meditation it seems that there is a tension between the fact that the body and mind are obvious. By analyzing these two kinds of meditation, Descartes' view seems to be inconsistent and needs further evaluation to reveal its true meaning. Descartes says that in the second meditation, things are perceived through different intelligence and sixth meditation. Suspicious tension. My paper is about Rene de Carte's second meditation. In the second meditation, René Descartes' famous motto is "Cogito, Ergo Sum" or "I think I like this", as I also do. Finding his second meditation is the most controversial and interesting thing in his meditation. The second meditation is the most controversial meditation in Descartes meditation. And this is also his idea of ​​getting radical, because it shows that every kind of knowledge must be criticized and that people have to doubt everything, including himself. In meditation, Descartes changed the structure of discussion. With a second meditation he decided that he could not doubt whether he thought he was, but he was able to doubt the existence of the substance. However, he explicitly refused to use this situation to conclude that his mind is different from his body because he does not yet know his personality (7: 27). And in the sixth meditation he set up a sign of truth to satisfy himself. It is an extension and we can not consider what can not be expanded (7: 78). He is not based on this argument on the fact that he can doubt the existence of either, but based on clear and unique knowledge about thought and the nature of matter.

The words "fool", "fool", "fool", "fool" will soon be heard in life. When people misunderstand or do not understand topics, they are tagged with these names. People who are truly "fool" and "fool" are those who have ingenuity, but they do not apply their knowledge to their lives. On the other hand, even if "difficult" forgets your lunch money, those who try to solve the world's hardships with their own thoughts are, of course, intelligent people. My paper is about Rene de Carte's second meditation. In the second meditation, René Descartes' famous motto is "Cogito, Ergo Sum" or "I think I like this", as I also do. Finding his second meditation is the most controversial and interesting thing in his meditation. The second meditation is the most controversial meditation in Descartes meditation. Because his first question method is explicitly introduced. And this is also his idea of ​​becoming extreme, because all sorts of knowledge must be criticized and people have to doubt everything, including himself. Rene de Carte (1596 - 1650) Rene de Carte is a French philosopher and mathematician. Descartes made a great contribution to the philosophy of rationalism. Descartes' meditation is epoch-making. Because he doubts the previous belief and is trying to prove their validity through logic. Later empiricists opposed Descartes' method, but his philosophy broke many topics for further discussion. Descartes has been proved to be "the existence of God", but his doubt was an important step in promoting the reasons over faith. Descartes also made an important discovery in geometry, calculus and mathematics analysis. From the grounds to the conclusion After examining the origin of Descartes metaphysics, this paper will question the contradiction of the Cartesian law. Rene Descartes started his investigation by doubting all sorts of knowledge, and he further believed that things that might be suspected were completely wrong. Why is the idea of ​​perfection perfect indefinitely come true using Descartes' method? If infinitely perfect God's thought doubts how he can infer the existence of God from this suspicious thinking? Rene de Culto was born on March 31, 1596 in the magnificent city of southern France (Duran, France). Joachim Descartes - His father is a member of Congress and intelligence and guarantees that Descartes will provide an excellent environment for learning. In 1606, when Descartes reached 8 years old, he entered the Jesuit college of Henry IV and studied literature, grammar, science and mathematics for eight years there. He is usually and seriously unhealthy and is allowed to stay in bed every morning. But he studied classics, logic, and philosophy. With all Descartes, I found that mathematics is satisfying for the truth of natural science. In 1614, he left college to study Poitiers' civil law and norms. In 1616 he got a bachelor's degree and license. In addition to that degree, Descartes also spends time studying philosophy, theology and health. As a messenger, Descartes studied mathematics for several years with friends in Paris.

In the field of philosophy, there are many answers to general questions, depending on the viewpoint of the subject of a particular philosopher. Usually, the answer is unspecified. In a broad sense, this word also appears in the dictionary. It can be said that it pursues human knowledge and human values. There are many different people who have many different knowledge theories. Two of them, and philosophers will drill down Descartes and Plato. Pondering the first philosophy validates Descartes' debate about the existence of God. The purpose of this paper is to explore Descartes' inference and proof of the existence of God. In the third meditation, Descartes presented two arguments to prove the existence of God, a trademark argument and a traditional cosmological argument. His claims are powerful and relatively realistic, but they do not prove the existence of God. At the beginning of meditation, Descartes began to refuse Rene de Carte is a French philosopher and is known for versions of trademark debate and ontological discussion. What is the theme of this book: contemplation of Descartes' first philosophy? 'This book was originally written in French from a gender-neutral talker's point of view. Below is a summary of important ideas in Descartes meditation. In the first part of Descartes meditation, he realized that nothing could be confirmed unless he was suspected. His doubts must start with doubts about himself. Descartes does not think that he does not exist, he believes the opposite is true. However, "suspicion" is a philosophical process and I doubt that it is a stage. Without a doubt, Descartes can cast doubt on the essence of his view. Consideration on "Descartes meditation - the theme of the first philosophical meditation" The contemplation of Rene Descartes' first philosophy is considered to be one of the most important works of modern philosophy. John Rock, Immanuel Kant, and numerous other philosophers have shown most of the reaction to Descartes. However, there is a serious doubt about the main argument of this paper. - Imagine your culture being thrown aside and new culture taught to you. How do you respond? In this story, the author, Jamaica Kinkade talks about her reaction to her and her experience. The writer grew up where British colonial rule took place. She grew up in a small island in the Caribbean, Antigua. She talked about England in her life, this is the place she has never seen before.

In Plato's Theetetus, Socrates studied the initial definition of knowledge given by the aetetus, ie knowledge is perception. Socrates gave us many examples of both supporting and rebelling knowledge and cognition. The basic requirement of Protagoras is that the truth is based on the recognition of everyone. This means that things seem to be for everyone as they seem to be that person. Socrates explained to us the Protagoras view with a cold wind example. Through Protagoras theory, he said that cold winds are cold and warm winds are warm. This article talks about Socrates asking about the essence of human lifestyle. In this article, I will first outline the importance of understanding Socrates' s good life and self - recognition. Then, it will study the learning theory cultivated by the dialectic of Socrates and the theory of human nature of Socrates. Using Plato's story on Euthyphro, it will demonstrate the practical nature of Socrates' mission to make people think and understand their own mistakes through the destructive process of Socrates dialectic. Finally, it deprives Euthyphro of the details and will show the phased process of Socratic law. The turning point in the history of early philosophical science is an example in which Socrates applied philosophy to human studies, which are human nature, the nature of the political community, and human knowledge itself. The Socratic method described in the Plato dialogue is a dialectical way to eliminate the hypothesis: better assumptions can be found by steadily identifying and eliminating methods leading to contradictions. This is an answer to Sophist's emphasis on rhetoric. The Socratic method searches for common, usually held truths that form beliefs and carefully examines them for determining consistency with other beliefs. Socrates criticized the study of old physics purely as speculative and without self-criticism. Socrates was condemned by his apology as having corrupted the young Athens. He does not believe in the gods of the country's faith, but believes in other new spiritual beings. " 30e

Logical mistake for Descartes 'first philosophical thinking Descartes' thought towards the first philosophy includes proving the existence of material objects like trees. Descartes accomplished this by first doubting everything, then he learned that there is no choice except he thinks of his existence as a sort of thought. From this certainty, Descartes can provide proof of the existence of God and ultimately can prove the existence of a material subject. However, the proof of Descartes' god makes it proof of material matters, making it suspicious. Evidence depends on knowledge of clear and obvious ideas, but knowledge is clear and clear. The full text of philosophical text can be posted to formal logic and emphasizes the logical order between the premise of discussion and the conclusion. The following is an excerpt from Descartes' pondering the first philosophy. There, we prove that physical objects exist from the bottom of our heart. Then turn the argument into formal logic. Let's compare it with some Ruby code. This is an excerpt from a program that assembles vans, calculates items, applies discounts, and calculates the total amount. Although these examples are written in different languages ​​and occupy completely different functions, the if / then relationship between the two is very rich and large ideas are broken down into a single premise or a separate way I will. Small and manageable problem Pondering the first philosophy validates Descartes' debate about the existence of God. The purpose of this paper is to explore Descartes' inference and proof of the existence of God. In the third meditation, Descartes presented two arguments to prove the existence of God, a trademark argument and a traditional cosmological argument. His claims are powerful and relatively realistic, but they do not prove the existence of God. At the beginning of meditation, Descartes began to refuse This argument comes from the 17th century French philosopher René Descartes. In the groundbreaking first philosophical meditation (1911), Descartes ended meditation in a skeptical way and denied all his knowledge. How was this skeptical conclusion born? It is based on a kind of degeneracyism - totally universal degeneracy. And his argument about this shamefulness - as it is often called - an argument of evil genius (or evil devil) - may be presented in this way: what kind of belief you have ... Something ... Does not exist in your mind, or the devil is installed there for the devil. They may be installed to cheat and install you: perhaps any or all of them are fakes. True, you do not believe this has happened to you. Still, that might be possible. Please be aware that the evil genius is not only others, but also especially wise people.

While reviewing Descartes's book "Meditation on the First Philosophy," assess Descart's argument about the existence of God. I noticed that there were some fatal flaws in his reasoning in the third mediation. Please read this chapter carefully so please start with the beginning and rate his reasoning. As Descartes thought that I was self-evident, he valued that he was convinced that he was a thoughtful, and then he continues to see other things he can decide I intended to do. He realized that "I am thoughtful", he has a "clear understanding" of what he is claiming, then looking back on it and clearly recognizing that the truth is true . . Discussion of Rene Descartes on the existence of God Rene Descartes's debate about the existence of God is related to his rationalistic deduction reasoning. Descartes concluded that the truth about the existence of God exists in His idea about the completeness of God and the essence of God (as a complete existence that must exist to be perfect). - All moral arguments about the existence of God are based on the principle that all of us share common sense of morality. Despite cultural differences, in a broad sense, people all over the world have ambiguous thoughts about right and wrong; a moral argument to the existence of God is that this mutual understanding is evidence of the existence of God I will say that. Immanuel Kant advocated this argument (not a moral argument); a god as a source of objective morality Second argument about the existence of God. Because Descartes believes the existence is perfect, it can become a predicate to God. First, I will explain what the ontological argument of the existence of God is. Next, I will explain why Descartes decided to incorporate God into his philosophical approach. As a predicate of God existence reveals some truth about God. Ontology seeks to prove the existence of God from a transcendental point of view In the 17th century, René de Carte defended a series of similar arguments. For example, in the fifth meditation, Descartes claims to provide evidence that God exists within the concept of extremely perfect existence. Descartes believes that there is contradiction in imagining a very perfect existence that does not exist, compared to the idea of ​​a triangle whose interior angle is not equal to 180 degrees. Therefore, he believes that we have a very perfect idea of ​​existence - we imagined a really perfect being - we believe we must conclude that there is a perfect existence Descartes insists that there may be the best existence and will try to gain knowledge about him. However, Descartes is a deadly and finite existence without God's will, who can not seize infinite will and nature. By definition, even if God is permitted to do so to him, God may also ban this. Descartes believes that allowing God to know himself and allowing him to recognize himself through logic is an estimate that heavily depends on two very unstable supports. And God is not a crook. All knowledge claims are easy to base and ultimately seem to be present in some unconfirmed assumptions (according to Russell according to mathematics), but that is unnoticed by us Hypothetical benefits to prevent from giving away

The ontological argument proposed by Descartes and the cosmological argument proposed by Aquilel Descartes which is often referred to as the father of modern philosophy is a discussion of Anselm attempting to prove God only through the meaning of the word "God" Developed. The presence of. An ontological argument is a transcendental argument that uses logic to prove that the initial definition is correct. The basis of these arguments depends on the understanding of the essence of the human god. The definition of Anselm's god is "an extremely perfect existence", which is the basis of his argument. Descartes is not the first philosopher who suggested an ontological argument. Early versions of this discussion were criticized by monks who were strongly defended by St. Anselm in the 11th century and then named St. Thomas Aquinas named Gauniro (modern in Anselm). Parameter version) Since Aquinas' criticism is considered to be destructive, ontological arguments have disappeared for centuries. Therefore, Descartes was surprised to find that he should try to restore it. Although he insists that he is not used to the evidence version of Anselm, Descartes seems to advocate his own argument to stop traditional objections. Recently, Kurt Gödel, Charles Hartshorne, Norman Malcolm, and Alvin Plantinga are presenting many ontological arguments being discussed, and these discussions provide an interesting link to St. Anselm, Descartes, and Leibniz's initial discussion I'm waiting. The most interesting of these are Gödel and Plantanga; however, in these cases it is unknown whether these authors should argue that these arguments are proof of the existence of God. Criticism of the ontological argument began with Gauniro at the same time as St. Anselm. Perhaps the most famous criticism of ontological debate is due to Emmanuel Kant in his criticism of pure reason. Most notably, Kant argues that ontological arguments are at risk by implicit assumptions that "existence" is a predicate. But as Bertrand Russell said, it is easy to be confident that ontological arguments are less accurate than what they are doing. A: The discussion of ontological arguments is based on rationality, not world observation (cosmology theory, objective argument etc.). Specifically, the reason for the ontology controversy is ontology. The first and most popular form of this discussion dates back to St. Anselm in the 11th century. He first pointed out that the concept of God is "existence, not imaginable existence". Since existence is possible and existence is bigger than it does not exist, God must exist (If you do not exist God, you can imagine a larger being, but it is self destruction. So, God must exist, Descartes has done a lot of the same, beginning with the idea of ​​perfection.

In my first philosophical thought, Descartes led the reader to practice methodology in philosophical quest. After depriving all the wisdom of false and false beliefs, he reviewed the nature and structure of existence and tried to obtain universally valid epistemology without skepticism. In hopes of a successful harmonization between science and theology, Descartes is a new and absolutely true foundation that acts as a catalyst for future scientific research through "mathematics to prove that the world can win the world" We promise to reestablish. With our intellectuals By contemplating the first philosophy, Descartes metaphysics was established. It recognizes his physics, as you can see from the analogy of his tree. In philosophical principles Descartes calculates the fundamentals of physics, and the first part is actually meditation meditation (slightly different). "Principles" are texts which greatly influence the development of modern physics. For example, Isaac Newton (1643-1727) will develop his physics as a reaction to Descartes and use the latter as his own foil. Actually, Newton's Principia (principle) may be called a tribute to Descartes' book. Therefore Descartes' physics (and his metaphysics) are thought to be incorrect, but it plays an important role in the development of modern physics. In my first philosophical thought, Descartes led the reader to practice methodology in philosophical quest. After depriving all the wisdom of false and false beliefs, he reviewed the nature and structure of existence and tried to obtain universally valid epistemology without skepticism. In hopes of a successful harmony of science and theology, Descartes promises to rebuild a new foundation for absolute and certain truth as a catalyst for future scientific research "The mathematical physics of the world It shows what can be realized through our intellectual biology. Pondering the first philosophy validates Descartes' debate about the existence of God. The purpose of this paper is to explore Descartes' inference and proof of the existence of God. In the third meditation, Descartes presented two arguments to prove the existence of God, a trademark argument and a traditional cosmological argument. His claims are powerful and relatively realistic, but they do not prove the existence of God. At the beginning of meditation, Descartes began to refuse

Discussion of René Descartes on the First Philosophical Methods and Ideas Descartes initially designed his four rules to be a solid foundation for everything else he understood, in order to begin pursuing the truth. These rules are evaluated here based on factors not considered. These rules are reviewed separately and continuously and therefore need to be repeated to clarify these rules. In addition, the way to use these rules has been analyzed to some extent. The philosophical principle (Latin: Principia Philosophia) is a book by René Descartes. Essentially it is the synthesis of the first philosophical approach and meditative discourse. It was written in Latin and was published in 1644. It is devoted to Bohemian Elizabeth and has longstanding friendship with Descartes. The French version (Les Principes de la Philosophie) was published in 1647. It explains the principle of nature - the law of physics - as Descartes sees. Most notably, it proposes the principle that the movement of the object becomes uniform and linear when there is no external force. Newton borrowed this principle from Descartes into his own principire; to this day it is still known as Newton's first movement law. This book is primarily intended to replace the course of Aristotle used in the then university of France and the UK. Philosopher Rene Descartes is the first step in his "methodology" (1637). This is the only statement that survived the test of his way questions. As Descartes discussed in the second part of the sixth contemplation of the first philosophy, this statement is undoubted ... Discoursdelaméthode (1637; discourse on how), the opening sentence, "All people Assuming the psychological process of ", in all things in the world, the distribution of all things is the most uniform ...". If done correctly, This argument comes from the 17th century French philosopher René Descartes. In the groundbreaking first philosophical meditation (1911), Descartes ended meditation in a skeptical way and denied all his knowledge. How was this skeptical conclusion born? It is based on a kind of degeneracyism - totally universal degeneracy. And his argument about this shamefulness - as it is often called - an argument of evil genius (or evil devil) - may be presented in this way: every belief that you have ... Well, something ... that exists only in your mind, or the devil is installed there for the devil. They may be installed to trick you into installing: probably any or all of them are fakes. True, you do not believe this has happened to you. Still, that might be possible. Please be aware that the evil genius is not only others, but also especially wise people.

I. INTRODUCTION This paper is an evaluation of Descartes' discussion about our sensory manipulation and the influence of the devil by deception. The second part is an explanation of the way of doubt and how it proceeds to the third part that evaluates progress through evil spirits. Fourth, how can people reach the conclusion that they are skeptical and evil discussions, are still present, and ideas? Descartes was skeptical at the first two mediation. Descartes first solves radical skepticism implied by an evil devilish argument by deciding that he is intellectual essence. According to Descartes, this "I" self-view is born, we are born, even a demon can not be doubted. Despite the evil demons' claims, Descartes does not deny the existence of God. The way Descartes presented the argument made the devil coexist with the god. So when his heart is deceived or given incorrect information, it is not from God but from the devil. From this skeptical argument, people will doubt the existence of the outside world. If the devil really exists, the only part of our existence may be our idea. Therefore, the outside world where we live in this world does not exist, it means just a miracle where our demons are placed in our hearts. Naturally, this sounds unreasonable for any ordinary person, but it is the world that Descartes may be in doubt in his common beliefs. An evil demon 's claim is Descartes' most extreme argument. He proposed a concept of a malicious god. This malicious god is proposed to be responsible for sensual fraud. It can be inferred that fraud can cast doubts on the idea of ​​the world. So even under the same conditions you can even doubt the existence of a person (later Descartes uses his 'Cogito ergo sum' statement to dispute this). Descartes believes that even posterior knowledge may be the result of carefully manipulated and controlled implanted fraud by malice. He believes that this god is evil as it relates to lies, and that the benevolent God is not evil

Over the years, many scientists and philosophers have believed that humans are composed of physical and mental (Radner, 1971). Some of them believe that the mind is different from the body, and each of them has no interaction under their own influence (Radner, 1971). Another point of view is that the body and the mind act together as a whole and the result is human. Great figures like Greek philosophers Aristotle and Ladner (1971) have always held this view. Running Head: DESCARTES VS SPINOZA 1 Issue II: On the physical and mental relationship between Descartes and Spinoza Nicole Yang 20502251 PHIL 384 July 23, 2014 How do the different entities of the two dimensions interact? Human thought and unification of the body are persistent philosophical problems that have been sought since ancient Greece, and it is one of the major problems studied by Descartes and Spinoza. Descartes started this discourse at a rationalist school, and Spinoza later answered his work. In this article, we compare the views of Descartes and Spinoza about human thought and body relationship and keep Spinoza's assertion. Similarity Descartes and Spinoza have relatively little similarity between beliefs about the connection between the body and the mind. The first point determines the epistemological independence of the mind and the body The dualism of Descartes' mind and matter means the concept of humanity. According to Descartes, humans are a complex existence of thought and body. Descartes prioritizes the mind and thinks that the mind can exist without the body but the body can not exist without the mind. In meditation, Descartes believes that although the mind is a substance, the body consists only of "accidents". However, he believes that the mind and body are closely related. Nature tells me through pain, hunger, thirst, etc. Together, I will form a unit with the body. I will not feel pain even if my body is hurt, but I will only be perceived by intelligence just as a crew sees something broken on his ship. Descartes' view of the mind and body problems is called interaction. He said that the mind and body communicate with each other without mutual exchange. He insists that Meditation 6, the relationship between body and mind is not similar to the relationship between pilot and ship. This relationship has no intimate relationship. According to him he says that our relationship with our soul and body is not such a type as our relationship with our soul and body is too intimate. "The pineal gland is also known as the pineal gland, a small endocrine gland in the brain of a vertebrate, a small endocrine gland in the brain of a vertebrate It is an effect that affects the adjustment of the awakening / sleep mode It produces a certain melatonin, and the light cycle of the hormone (seasonal function, it seems like a small pine cone, located near the center of the brain, between the two hemispheres hidden in the two circular thalamids It is shaped.

My intention in this article is to demonstrate that the discussion on the existence of God and the fear of deception in Descartes 'First Philosophy' controversy is rather weak and does not prove his conclusion. To support these arguments, we first outline the two concrete meditations and explain the proposed discussion. Later, I criticize his argument and reveal unjust conclusions. Suspicion of text includes features of God's proposal, perfect conditions, and the nature of fraud. In the first paper by Thomas Lennon and Michael Hickson, Descartes' suspicion of meditation, in particular all certainty decisions, even meditation - depends on the certainty of God's existence. As seen at the end of this review, this article points out the secret to understanding meditation control. Deborah Brown believes Descartes 'skepticism is at least somewhat deeper, even if there is significant importance between Descartes' skepticism and ancient skepticism. It is fundamental as it spans the contents of Descartes. Our thoughts As I said before, God plays an important role in Death Cart's meditation, including prove the existence of God. Through his meditation, Descart experienced a lot of evidence about the existence of God that starts from meditation 3 through to the end. This is God's first role in the Cartesian system. Because it's like building blocks, an important part of the system structure. Because he uses the concept of God (in particular the deceptive god) to prove the conclusion. Eliminate all the other things he may have doubts. He dispels the allegations of the devil through evidence of the presence of a merciful God. He also used God as evidence of a clear and clear perception. Several important arguments from meditation III-V I. Third meditation: God presence A. Cosmological evidence of the existence of God In the third meditation, Descartes says that God (i) exists, ( ii) the essence of trying to prove that it is a meditator (the essence of being the author of thinking), and (iii) why a meditator exists (even if it exists at another moment from one moment). The premise of the existence of God is that each one of us understands the following clear and unique concept of God.

This content is available through online browsing (free) program dependent on page scan. Screen readers can not currently scan, so please contact JSTOR user support for access. We will provide PDF copy of your screen reader Aristotle's homomorphic mapping model is a combination of substance and form, or a combination of body and soul, and it is the two dimensional existence (for Aristotle, the soul is a form of the body and the body is a matter of the soul). Descartes dualism is to separate matter, mind and soul into two entities or substances within a person. I add that both philosophers regard the soul and thought as the central position (the center of Aristotle and the pineal gland in Descartes' brain). In the case of Descartes it is controversial (see here), but it also has the potential to maintain a sense of interaction between the two. For Descartes, personal personal soul and thoughts are eternal. Then I have it. Two modes of mankind, soul and body, - Aristotle's homosexuality and Descartes dualism. Each has its doubts. If the body and soul are combined as matter and form, how do you explain the apparent power of the soul beyond substance when considering non-materiality and prevalence? Do humans crave universally universally to survive after death? On the other hand, if the soul is a completely independent substance from the substance and the body is just a machine to regulate a large part of the substance, how can they unite and interact in complex organisms Is not it? As with La Mettrie after a century in Descartes, completely abandoning the concept of soul and solving all living creatures, including humans, is a mere boring view of the pseudo-machine. However, there is a problem with this perspective. Probably the most important thing is to keep looking and thinking about our body and soul. Or at least we continue to think. .

Even in the absence of the necessary power and discretion, like the philosophers Nietzsche, Descartes, Hume and the past, freedom confuses today's argument. There are two strong opposites to this topic. One is determinism and the other is "free will". All events, including determinism or belief that a person lacks free will, and human behavior, are determined by forces other than the will of the individual, as opposed to the premise of completely free will. Rene de Carte details his philosophical work through deductive reasoning and uses his reasoning system to complete his work. Many philosophers oppose Descartes. In all discussions about the theory proposed by Descartes, his beliefs have two major flaws. The first one is elusive "I" that questions and idealists David Hume question. Hume opposed Descartes' view that "I think I like this". Hume thinks that "I" does not exist in thinking but exists only in "a bunch of perceptions". Through this Hume, thought means that it consists only of what the mind perceives, regardless of whether it is reality or just a fantasy. Another major controversy in Descartes' philosophical thinking is that he made assumptions not proved in his meditation, only the hypothesis. In Descartes' meditation, he said that there is a God, but he can not prove it at all. Descartes circles mentioned by many philosophers are displayed like this. Descartes assumed that there is a god. Then he continued saying: David Hume's empiricalism Sanket Thakkar Oakton Community College starts with a philosopher based on his entire philosophy. Descartes rejects all premises and raises questions about congenital problems. He hid all assumptions and believed only things that could be proved. The purpose of putting everything in orderly doubt is that we do not know that it is true unless there is evidence. Descartes began to doubt his existence and started with that premise. "I am directly responsible for this, in his judicial work, David Hume put great emphasis on the distribution of social property, according to Mr. Hume, justice is an important social To prove his view on how virtue is and property distribution defines social justice, David Hume cited several examples.

Descartes' view on the subject of spiritual philosophy Descartes made some remarkable contributions to the philosophy of the mind. The purpose of this article is to discuss these contributions. Descartes is known for its fanatical dualism. This is an opinion that the mind and body are independent of each other, and it is understood that to some extent it is a causal relationship. Descartes is no exception, I believe that the body and spirit are two completely different substances. An important development of Cogito is the foundation of branch of philosophy, philosophy of mind. Cogito places Descartes in a position of dualism of mind and body. Descartes has drawn a simple entity consisting of two worlds, although the body can be understood, but the mind does not understand. Things that contain things and substances are space and time, and some ideas are pure thoughts rather than material. Composition This position affects Gilbert Ryle and P. F. Stephen opposed this view in the 20th century What is so dangerous? In order to find the answer, we need to look back over the "Father of modern philosophy" René Descartes during the 4th century. Together with him, we have created our modern concept of mind and body dualism (later called "Descartes dualism"), whose mind and body are seen as two different substances - spirit and matter - It was. Before Descartes, of course, this idea was supported by churches and other philosophers, but his role was to incorporate it into a prosperous scientific worldview. Regarding Descartes dualism, there are two other ways of viewing, but we believe that we are all natural today. The first is free will. Descartes wrote in his "passion of soul": "Will is inherently free and never limited," he said of all our decisions, our character and our behavior I believe that it comes from our hearts. From our soul. Therefore, we will ultimately bear ethical and other responsibilities for ourselves and our actions. Even in studies of mind philosophy, cognitive science, neuroscience, etc., we use Descartes' heart and body dualism as a foil. This usage is rooted in the criticism advocated by Princess Bohemian Elizabeth (1618 - 1680). She believes that when Descartes considers the real distinction between physique and body, they believe that causal interaction is impossible. After all, causal interaction can be achieved through contact; things like the body touch each other through their surface. But unless they spread, the heart can not have a surface, so the body can not touch the heart, and vice versa.

"Cogito ergo sum - I think so." Mathematicians, scientific thinkers, and metaphysics Rene Descart used this term in his "first philosophical meditation". This word is particularly pronounced in Western philosophy. But this word is not the only legacy of Descartes. Her legacy includes Cartesian coordinates, development of philosophical books and theories. Even though the difference between the body and the mind can trace back to the Greeks, Descartes' explanation on physical and mental relationships is considered to be the first and most influential. In his book 'The First Philosophy of Meditation', Descartes' purpose is to provide a solid foundation for the knowledge of the outside world through many parts. In the second part of his meditation, Descartes' subtitle is "the nature of human thought, and the way it is better known than the body". Continue seeking the truth and give up uncertain ideas. He mentioned the famous route of Archimedes, it gives the unwavering point that he can move the whole planet. Likewise, the unwavering truth of Descartes, and the truth he built the foundation of knowledge is "Cogito · Ergo · Sam". I think so My paper is about Rene de Carte's second meditation. In the second meditation, the famous motto of Rene Descartes is "Cogito, Ergo Sum" or "I think this is my favorite" and as I am also, I think the concepts and ideas presented by Rene Descartes I analyzed and decided to criticize. Finding his second meditation is the most controversial and interesting thing in his meditation. The second meditation is the most controversial meditation in Descartes meditation. Because his first question method is explicitly introduced. And this is also his idea of ​​getting radical, because it shows that every kind of knowledge must be criticized and that people have to doubt everything, including himself. The contemplation of Rene Descartes' first philosophy is considered to be one of the most important works of modern philosophy. John Rock, Immanuel Kant, and numerous other philosophers have reacted most to Descartes. However, there is a serious doubt about the main argument of this paper. - Imagine your culture being thrown aside and new culture taught to you. How do you respond? In this story, the author, Jamaica Kinkade talks about her reaction to her and her experience. The writer grew up where British colonial rule took place. She grew up in a small island in the Caribbean, Antigua. She talked about England in her life, this is the place she has never seen before.

Throughout history, we have a couple of problems where we came from, and how we get there. It all results in the problem of the existence of God. In the times of Christianity, Judaism, and Muslim, the existence of God has never been questioned. The problem of the existence of God comes from our new way of thinking after these religions. Science makes us think about how things work in our world and casts doubts on the existence of God. Since Jesus did not do scientific research on the day to prove that God existed, the people of history got the concept of God from where. In this article, I will explain how Descartes uses his existence to prove the existence of God. It is based on "I think that God's thought is in my heart" and "I think so". - First of all, I must say that God believes that he has a universal church, the church of God. To my knowledge, many of the people who claim to be God's saints are not. Discussion of Rene Descartes on the existence of God Rene Descartes's debate about the existence of God is related to his rationalistic deduction reasoning. Descartes concluded that the truth about the existence of God exists in His idea about the completeness of God and the essence of God (as a complete existence that must exist to be perfect). - All moral arguments about the existence of God are based on the principle that all of us share common sense of morality. Despite cultural differences, in a broad sense, people all over the world have ambiguous thoughts about right and wrong; a moral argument to the existence of God is that this mutual understanding is evidence of the existence of God I will say that. Immanuel Kant advocated this argument (not a moral argument); a god as a source of objective morality A geometric argument to derive the nature of an object from that concept or concept suggests to Descart that a person may infer the existence of God from the concept or concept of God. (The argument about the existence of God is called an ontological argument, these arguments were originally proposed by St. Anselm of Canterbury in the 11th century.) Descartes 'description of Descartes' ontological argument listed. How persuasive is Descartes? Is it convincing like a mathematical demonstration? Is it convincing like Cogito?

Therefore, God must exist. Gaunilo of Marmoutiers separates Anselm's idea and asks the people to think that the island is "better" than any other island. This will help to cause errors in this discussion. Pure inference is completely incomplete and often extra, can not be used to justify empirical evidence. Rene Descartes has a descriptive idea about this material; Descartes has absolutely a complete existence in his "fifth meditation" as if you do not want to equalize interior corners There is no beginning of his existence Because his concept of original ideas and principles is huge, a 180 degree triangle Discussion about the existence of the Descartes God is very common in his fifth meditation. In this meditation, Descartes talks about how God became "perfect perfection". Therefore, if this god does not have anything, he must exist because it can not lack existence. As Descartes stated, "The lack of existence (ie lack of completeness) in thinking about God is like a mountain without a valley, which is also a contradiction." (Descartes) 203) . He compared God to the mountain and compared his existence with the valley. He said that God does not exist like a mountain without a valley. Because you can not say that there are no valleys in the mountains, how can you say that you do not have a god? He said that the two things, mountains and valleys, can not be separated from each other just as God and its existence can not be separated. In René Descartes 'fifth meditation' he stated the reason for the existence of God. He continues to have reasons to prove his arguing that existence is believing in God and not existing. Descartes gives an analogy between the mountain and the valley and points out that if you believe that there are mountains, they can not deny the existence of the valley as stated in this sentence: "Mountains without mountains think Not from the fact that mountains and valleys do not exist anywhere, only the mountains and valleys are inseparable from each other, regardless of whether they exist or not.I think about God Because existence can not be separated, existence can not be separated from God, so he exists .. "As we have seen here, he further supports his argument,

The contemplation of Rene Descartes' first philosophy is considered to be one of the most important works of modern philosophy. John Rock, Immanuel Kant, and numerous other philosophers have shown most of the reaction to Descartes. However, there is a serious doubt about the main argument of this paper. In opposing opinion and correspondence, philosopher Antoine Arnauld raised the question whether Descartes made circular reasoning. In the first meditation Descartes thought of the first philosophy, he began to doubt the four beliefs. These beliefs are as follows. The existence of a person's own body, the existence of other bodies / things, mathematical knowledge, and God. Each of these beliefs is based on extreme allegations. Through the fundamental process, Descartes then ascertains whether each belief is there. The first thing that Descartes thought was to judge whether the body was there. He said that some of the facts we currently have will be realized through our senses. But our sense sometimes causes us to misunderstand us wrong conclusions about specific things and situations. In order to prove that sensation is misleading, Descartes leads the reader to "dream arguments". He explained what she might feel when she was dreaming. Interpretation and abstract of Essay.com/ Descartes 'first philosophical considerations' first and second considerations Descartes 'First Meditation and Interpretation and Summary of Descartes' First Meditation and Second Meditation in "First Philosophical Meditation" In his meditation on 'the first philosophy', Descartes basically wrote a skeptical approach. In his universal allegation system, Descartes accepted only those beliefs that dismissed all his beliefs and could prove expressly. Descartes is a mathematician, a philosopher, and a skeptic, I admire his work as a novice mathematician, philosopher, and skeptic. However, apart from his skeptical approach, I think that his logic is inaccurate and his argument is irrational. In Descartes' sixth meditation, when jumping to an article in front of him, he defined himself as a mind and body double principle. His allegiance to this involves his assumption on how very inappropriate data and the mind and body interact, and if they are two different substances, it is the most desirable promising way of thinking is.

Descartes' Discussion on the True Distinction of Mind and Body Descartes believes that thought and body are three main arguments against two different kinds of substances. These arguments called material dualism are as follows. * Skeptical discussion: Descartes argues that you can pretend or think that you do not have your body, but you can not pretend or pretend that it does not exist anywhere . In this meditation, Descartes gives his famous modal theory, it is really to distinguish between body and mind. (This is in the first part of the paragraph, first of all I know all the things I clearly and clearly imagine.) First of all, look at the options of the above principle. What is the real difference? In case of __________, A and B are really different. Therefore, the conclusion of the Cartesian argument does not say that physical and mental exist, but only the presence of ________. (Likewise, even if water and dirt come together to form mud, it really is not.) Restructure the discussion of Descartes: In particular, Descartes aims to provide scientifically-oriented arguments about this permanent inner self. He uses rational arguments and examples to prove that the body and mind are completely different. He advocated the idea that the mind can exist and can survive without body. This distinction among people is called mind and body doctrine, and in our society it was always influential and powerful theory. The following is an example of Descartes' heart and body dualism. Individual identity sometimes develops in the direction of our lives, and sometimes even changes. For example, when a person is 25 years old, he is himself a specific party, a part of a certain belief, and regards himself as a middle class, but when he is 65 years old he is totally different People. Perhaps he is no longer interested in politics, he changes his religious beliefs, and his living expenses are under 25 years old.

Proof of the existence of God in Descartes 'meditation The purpose of this paper is to explain and evaluate the evidence of the existence of God in Descartes' meditation III. It should prove the weakness of the evidence and prove the merit of that proof. It will give the real background accepted by Descartes. This article also explains in Descartes the two main points of the existence of God and the reasons why they are easily proved wrong. This document also shows that if God exists God may actually be a liar. Several important arguments from meditation III-V I. Third meditation: God presence A. Cosmological evidence of the existence of God In the third meditation, Descartes says that God (i) exists, ( ii) the essence of (proving to be a meditator) (the essence of being the author of thinking), and (iii) the reason why a meditator exists (even if it exists at another moment from one moment). The premise of the existence of God is that each one of us understands the following clear and unique concept of God. As I said before, God plays an important role in Death Cart's meditation, including prove the existence of God. Through his meditation, Descart experienced a lot of evidence about the existence of God that starts from meditation 3 through to the end. This is God's first role in the Cartesian system. Because it's like building blocks, an important part of the system structure. Because he uses the concept of God (in particular the deceptive god) to prove the conclusion. Eliminate all the other things he may have doubts. He dispels the allegations of the devil through evidence of the presence of a merciful God. He also used God as evidence of a clear and clear perception. ... Prove the existence of God. The final evidence presented in the fifth meditation starts with the proposition of Descartes as a natural concept of perfect existence. Otherwise, he is not perfect, so we conclude that God must exist. This ontological argument about science is because they believe that God is omnipotent and that his will is completely free. Lie - logical contradiction - even the truth. In contrast, human wisdom is limited. The purpose of this paper is to investigate Descartes' discussion about the existence of God. First, I will consider the evidence of the existence of the Descartes God. Then I will discuss some of the influences of God's existence. Finally, I will point out some of the complexities and problems in the evidence. Evidence of the existence of Descartes' God occurred in the third meditation. He proved his entire claim in the previous meditation, and he must exist for him to think. From this observation, Descartes realized that the concept of his existence is very clear and clear in his mind; based on this clarity and the fact that he just decided his existence, he Derived the rules Unique things are genuine. Descartes begins his proof by dividing "thinking" into four categories - thought (concept), will (choice), emotion (desire)!

Truly thinking about knowledge brings some interesting ideas. When asked to think about knowledge, most people only care about what they know, such as certain topics, theories, or facts. In the grand plan, this idea seems to be trivial or superficial. As a human being, we do not always think about how we know what we know. We often get knowledge with important classifications. An individual often considers knowledge and power as natural. Epistemology is an effective form of knowledge study. It comes from the Greek "epistem" meaning knowledge. (Www.philosophyclass.com/epistemology). Descartes is thought to be the first philosopher to seriously address epistemology. The relevance of knowledge is considered more or less obvious by previous philosophers. In the beginning of the 20th century, science philosophy has done a lot of work as physics had to push the forefront of theoretical interpretation and have to abandon the usual way of thinking. Different sciences always have two aspects. Philosophy of physical and theoretical science From a scientific point of view, you must experience something that you think is knowledgeable. "If a tree falls into the forest, does anyone in the vicinity hear it, does it make a sound?" Science gives a simple answer to this prediction. Science As the Americans wrote, "Sound is vibration, it is transmitted to our senses through the mechanism of the ear, it is recognized as sound only in our nerve center.When dropping trees and other obstacles Air vibration may occur.If you can not hear the ear, there will be no sound. We all know that there are trees in the woods, no one is around, ask if it makes a sound. If the sound compresses the air and vibrates, the answer is definitely yes. In addition to always available trees, there are other similar problems. Like this: We can not change the past, but imagine a possible future, you can choose it and do it. What is important is not what our fathers did to eliminate their existence (apparently they sent DNA to the chain).

Descartes tried to get rid of his doubt about doubt [reference of all pages and reference of meditation is taken from the 1995 Everyman version]. Please find an unquestionable knowledge base. By suspecting that Descartes wants to find something immune to it. This provides motivation to best understand how Descartes build his recognition system in his own way in his own way and why. Descartes' attempt to release himself from his doubts about meditation had various degrees of success, and his doubt about his existence was overcome with no doubt "cogito" theory It was. The second question he suspected, the question of the existence of God was not successfully released like a failed trademark theory argument or an out-of-date ontological argument. Then Descartes continued to address his question about the existence of the outside world. It did a good job, but it was based on dark evidence of the existence of God. Descartes can not prove the existence of God or the existence of the outside world, but he has undoubtedly created a new philosophical style trying to establish all his epistemological knowledge (or belief). As a premise, this philosophical style is now known as fundamentalism, and today it is also used by philosophers for Descartes, René de Carte proves himself as b in this book! Therefore, we have finished the discussion that Descartes is trying to remove skeptical attempts set for him. As mentioned earlier, the final conclusion of the success of Descartes' own business must be that he failed. If the entire epistemological structure relies heavily on some knowledge, in this case, knowledge of the existence of God, denying this knowledge destroys the entire structure. We can really give it to Descartes - which is of course controversial - he will have to agree to that idea when he appears correctly clear and unique ideas in his mind, and this also Regardless, because consent is approved, clear and unique ideas can be used equitably as the basis of knowledge. This is the best thing for us - this is not a bit - it is the knowledge that each of us exists when we insist on ourselves.

Descartes believes that by first claiming that human beings have fundamental rationality, it means "a kind of doubt, understanding, affirmation, denial, motivation, loss of motivation" (Descartes, 19). He believes that humans have the right idea that they can clearly and clearly understand themselves. He proposed the concept of mind. There, imagination and sensation are also the essential ability (ability) of the body, especially the power of the mind. However, in order to further clarify this "thinking", he acknowledges that there is always a high possibility that the devil is dreamed or deceived. Rene Descartes presented a number of arguments to prove that the mind and body are two different reality, but there is nothing more powerful than his "argument of consciousness". Descartes argues that thought is of thought and body is not so, the two entities can not be the same. By proveing ​​that the mind has knowledge, doubt, imagination, and hope functions, you can better understand the difference between the mind and the body. Since I am not just spreading my mind just thinking, on the other hand I have a clear and clear idea of ​​myself; on the other hand, since this is just an extension I am independent of the body I have the idea of. I have no idea. So, indeed, I am really different from my body and can survive without it (Cartesian, Qut. In Lawhead, 2003, 212) Finally, I looked at the discussion on Descartes' thought and body distinction. Descartes believes that he proved that the mind is better known than the body II of meditation. In meditation VI, he insists that he knows his idea clearly and clearly knows that its essence consists purely of ideas and that the essence of the body is purely extended It continues. Through the power of God, what can be clearly and unambiguously thought to exist separately from other things can be created to exist alone. At this point, Descartes obviously made a logical leap, arguing that the mind and body were made separately without justification. Most critics think this is irrational and not necessarily obey it because I can imagine my thinking being independent of my physical existence. Descartes believes that not only can the body be independent of the mind, it can exist even independently. This argument is based on an analysis of the reasons of his physical concept. He thought of four possible reasons: his thoughts, other thoughts, gods or bodies. Well, this idea shows what you can extend to him. Obviously, if the essence of his thought is the cause of thinking, that idea reverses its reasons - since thought is not extended. The same analysis applies to any other heart and god. People believe that what is expressed by this idea is expanded, and such ideas are clear and clear and, unless the things (reasons) that it represents are extended, God gives deceivers Will be. But God is not a fraudster (established with the third and fourth meditation). Therefore, impulses are reliable

Descartes believes that the existence of God is clear and obvious. God's thought exists to arise from his inner "perfectly clear and unique" concept (he acknowledges this as the existence of thought). Therefore, from various ideas, the concept of God is never regarded as false. From this very unique concept of God, there are things people clearly and clearly know. "Because existence can not be separated from God from the fact that God does not seem to exist, it actually exists." Discussion of Rene Descartes on the existence of God Rene Descartes's debate about the existence of God is related to his rationalistic deduction reasoning. Descartes concluded that the truth about the existence of God exists in His idea about the completeness of God and the essence of God (as a complete existence that must exist to be perfect). - All moral arguments about the existence of God are based on the principle that all of us share common sense of morality. Despite cultural differences, in a broad sense, people all over the world have ambiguous thoughts about right and wrong; a moral argument to the existence of God is that this mutual understanding is evidence of the existence of God I will say that. Immanuel Kant advocated this argument (not a moral argument); a god as a source of objective morality Second argument about the existence of God. Because Descartes believes the existence is perfect, it can become a predicate to God. First, I will explain what the ontological argument of the existence of God is. Next, I will explain why Descartes decided to incorporate God into his philosophical approach. As a predicate of God existence reveals some truth about God. Ontology seeks to prove the existence of God from a transcendental point of view RenéDescartes, often called the father of modern philosophy, has developed Anselm's assertion when trying to prove the existence of God in the meaning of the word "God". Ontological arguments are a priori arguments. The basis of these arguments depends on the understanding of the essence of the human god. The definition of Anselm's god is "an extremely perfect existence", which is the basis of his argument. God must be something that can not be considered absent: if you imagine a triangle, one of its main features is that it has three sides and three corners. These are triangle predicates. Descartes has expanded his point of view. This time I mentioned the attribute of God. If you imagine something perfect, it must be more perfect if it exists. Also, the most perfect ones have all attributes including existence. Therefore, Descartes believes that a very perfect existence has all the predicates.

Two years after Descartes' meditation on the first philosophy, Princess Elizabeth in Bohemia wrote about the relationship between the unimportant soul and the body - especially how nonphysical things produced the physical effect. She is neither the first nor the last to cast doubt on the practical application of Descartes dualism but her doubt led to the most comprehensive attempt to answer this question. In this article, I study Descartes' discussion on the physical and mental differences, outlines Elizabeth's objections and suggested solutions, and that Descartes's response to Elizabeth is not enough to solve believe Even in studies of mind philosophy, cognitive science, neuroscience, etc., we use Descartes' heart and body dualism as a foil. This usage is rooted in the criticism advocated by Princess Bohemian Elizabeth (1618 - 1680). She believes that when Descartes considers the real distinction between physique and body, they believe that causal interaction is impossible. After all, causal interaction can be achieved through contact; things like the body touch each other through their surface. But unless they spread, the heart can not have a surface, so the body can not touch the heart, and vice versa. Make an agenda for discussion of thought and body relationship after that. Descartes believes that thinking and body are different "substances". He believes that the body spreads in space and can not be thought of as a substance that you can feel or think about; on the contrary, thinking is an unthinkable, unthinkable, and undetectable substance. However, it is not easy to understand how they can cause and influence when thoughts and bodies are substances of completely different origin. Princess Elizabeth in Bohemia strongly emphasized him with a letter of 1643: In 1644, Descartes published "principles of philosophy" that summarized his physics and metaphysics. He dedicated this work to Elizabeth Stewart who developed him and his moral philosophy, Princess Elizabeth (1618-79), the daughter of the Queen of Bohemia. According to Descartes, human beings is a combination of Descartes' philosophical principle (1644; philosophical principle) and shows a deep understanding of the Cartesian system. Spinoza generally accepted Descartes 'physics but he rejected Descartes' metaphysics and opposed the three features. Descartes believes that not only can the body be independent of the mind, it can exist even independently. This argument is based on an analysis of the reasons of his physical concept. He thought of four possible reasons: his thoughts, other thoughts, gods or bodies. Well, this idea shows what you can extend to him. Obviously, if the essence of his thought is the cause of thinking, that idea reverses its reasons - since thought is not extended. The same analysis applies to any other heart and god. People believe that what is expressed by this idea is expanded, and such ideas are clear and clear and, unless the things (reasons) that it represents are extended, God gives deceivers Will be. But God is not a fraudster (established with the third and fourth meditation). Therefore, impulses are reliable

In Shakespeare's Henry V and Descartes 'contemplation of the first philosophy', the heroes laid the groundwork for those after that period. King Henry conquered political power in France, and he won the commonplace. On the other hand Descartes went into the center of his heart, hoping to understand the conviction which is quite contrasting with the church. However, both characters turn to different directions and achieve the clarity and knowledge they want. By contemplating the first philosophy, Descartes metaphysics was established. It recognizes his physics, as you can see from the analogy of his tree. In philosophical principles Descartes calculates the fundamentals of physics, and the first part is actually meditation meditation (slightly different). "Principles" are texts which greatly influence the development of modern physics. For example, Isaac Newton (1643-1727) will develop his physics as a reaction to Descartes and use the latter as his own foil. Actually, Newton's Principia (principle) may be called a tribute to Descartes' book. Therefore Descartes' physics (and his metaphysics) are thought to be incorrect, but it plays an important role in the development of modern physics. Pondering the first philosophy validates Descartes' debate about the existence of God. The purpose of this paper is to explore Descartes' inference and proof of the existence of God. In the third meditation, Descartes presented two arguments to prove the existence of God, a trademark argument and a traditional cosmological argument. His claims are powerful and relatively realistic, but they do not prove the existence of God. At the beginning of meditation, Descartes began to refuse Rene de Carte is a French philosopher and is known for versions of trademark debate and ontological discussion. What is the theme of this book: contemplation of Descartes' first philosophy? 'This book was originally written in French from a gender-neutral talker's point of view. Below is a summary of important ideas in Descartes meditation. In the first part of Descartes meditation, he realized that nothing could be confirmed unless he was suspected. His doubts must start with doubts about himself. Descartes does not think that he does not exist, he believes the opposite is true. However, "suspicion" is a philosophical process and I doubt that it is a stage. Without a doubt, Descartes can cast doubt on the essence of his view. Consideration on "Descartes meditation - the theme of the first philosophical meditation"

RenéDescartes (1596-1650) is a French mathematician, a scientific thinker, and a philosopher, an important contribution to mathematics, optics, epistemology and other fields that help shape the perception of the nature and humanity of the modern world I did it. I thought. He is the son of a lawyer educated at La Freche Jesuit College and Poitiers. He became a soldier and worked for Orange Prince Morris and Bayern Maximilian I army. He wrote many books in Latin and French. What is shown here is the first edition of his Principia philosophy (philosophical principle) published in Amsterdam in 1644 by a Dutch printer and book seller Louis Elzevir. This book is an ambitious attempt by Descartes to present the whole ideology in the form of textbooks on substance essence, essence of mind, God's creation and the beginning of the universe. This book is divided into four parts. In the first part we deal with metaphysics and sources of matters such as cognition, human knowledge and understanding, and complete and full knowledge of God and human mistakes (knowledge and morality). In the second part, we introduce the theory of physics general principles and kinetic laws. The third part is devoted to astronomical phenomena. In Part 4 I will explain the nature of minerals, metals, magnets and other natural phenomena and their understanding of their sensations. This book is bound to Specimina philosophiae, another work of Descartes, especially the second work, French to Latin translation, which corrects his 1637 discourse deraméthode (Discourse Method). Descartes' philosophical principle also presents his most extensive discussion about motor phenomena defined as "movement of a substance or an object from an adjacent object of an adjacent object to an adjacent object of another adjacent object" (Pr II 25) Descartes attempts to distinguish the concept of his "appropriate" movement as a "common" or "vulgar" movement concept, ie internal change, as the "neighbor" of the adjacent body (Pr II 10-15, 24-28). The surface (boundary with the container) of these accommodating bodies is also called "outer position" of the accommodating body. As Descartes considers passengers to be resting against various parts of the ship rather than being stationary relative to the ship, the concept of vulgar movements may cause the body to become more numerous (probably contradictory ) To participate in the movement at the same time. It is part of it. Shore (Pr II 24) In 1644, Descartes published "Philosophical Principles" that summarized his physics and metaphysics. He dedicated this work to Elizabeth Stewart who developed him and his moral philosophy, Princess Elizabeth (1618-79), the daughter of the Queen of Bohemia. Descartes is a combination of Descartes' philosophical principle (1644; philosophical principle) that shows a deep understanding of the Cartesian system. Spinoza generally accepted Descartes 'physics but he rejected Descartes' metaphysics and opposed the three features: the transcendence of God, the spiritual concept of "spiritual substance" is quite different from substance (Mind - body dualism ).

Many ancient philosophers including Plato explored reality related metaphysics before Descartes cast doubt on this question. However, Descartes' view of the mind and body dualism is quite different from Plato's viewpoint. As Marleen Rozemond (author of dualism of Descartes) pointed out, Plato believes that the body is only a container for the use of the soul, and Descartes provides the evidence that the body and soul are interrelated (172). Not only do one person use other people but they are separated, but the mind affects the body and the body affects the mind. "Matrix" is based on the philosophical problem advocated by French philosopher and mathematician René Descartes in the 17th century. One of the most important claims of Descartes is intellectual autonomy or the ability to think for himself. In the case of Descartes, this requires not only "good intentions" but also "good intentions". Descartes knows that his sensual experience is not necessarily consistent with the reality and uses wax arguments to prove how impaired the sensation is. However, as wax approaches the flame these functions change quickly. Descartes is often called "the father of modern philosophy" and suggests that he offered a new philosophical species that departed from the old philosophy in an important way. This "old" philosophy is Aristotle's philosophy. Because it was diverted and interpreted through the Middle Ages. Indeed, since Aristotleism is deeply rooted in the knowledge system of the Descartes era, critics believe that evidence of the truth is found in the Bible. Therefore, when someone tries to counter the Aristotle's main principle, he may be accused of being punished holding the opposite position of God's word. However, in the days of Descartes, many people opposed Scholastic Aristotle's paper or some other paper in some way. Thus, when Descartes discusses the implementation of his modern philosophical system, the destruction of academic tradition is not unprecedented.

The way of doubt is a systematic reasoning that all beliefs are rejected and in the next step it is checked whether they are certain before becoming knowledge. The father of this method is Renee Descartes. Descartes believed that this knowledge would not be justified, so he began using two tools to pursue the truth: suspicion and analysis. Doubt is his important tool from the doubt of finding the truth. "The basic strategy of Descartes' skeletal approach is to defeat skepticism in its own way. Descartes is trying to create a solid foundation for new science with a skeptical approach. This method should be based on unquestioned things. When Descartes took a skeptical approach, he doubted everything he got from his senses. The strategy adopted by Descartes is to hide his thoughts from things that are completely sure and doubtful. He decided that he should not cheat his existence. If he does not exist, he will not think; therefore, if he is thinking, he must exist. This is the sum of Cogito's ergo, "I think I am". For the first consideration, and for Descartes this is the highest priority. "The heart is better known than the body," Descartes not only proves that his existence is the substance, mind of thinking, but also believes that the body becomes a foreign matter to worry about later. From the grounds to the conclusion After examining the origin of Descartes metaphysics, this paper will question the contradiction of the Cartesian law. Rene Descartes started his investigation by doubting all sorts of knowledge, and he further believed that things that might be suspected were completely wrong. Why is the idea of ​​perfection perfect indefinitely come true using Descartes' method? If infinitely perfect God's thought doubts how he can infer the existence of God from this suspicious thinking?

Nelson's Cartesian Perceptualism and Judgmentism Summary: One of the tensions in Descartes' human error description is that, despite the fact that God is our omnipotent omnipotent creator, we are accused of will It comes from our view that it is. . In this article, I will explain Descartes' second pressure against human error. After explaining the tension, I reviewed Alan Nelson's explanation of the Descartes approach to disarmament it. The explanation of Nielsen is nearly correct, but I think that it hides some interesting details of Descartes' recognition and judgment theory. In order to solve the problem, the meditator began to investigate the cause of the error. Descartes suggested his judgmentism during the discussion. Determine cooperation from intelligence and will. As a result of the investigation, the cause of the error was judged to be inappropriate use of our free will. Errors will arise if the intent agrees with a proposition with clear and unclear understanding of intelligence. Because we have the right to avoid mistakes, these mistakes are our responsibility. Descartes' minimum standard is aimed at the level of certainty that arises when the perception of the mind is clear and clear. (For Descartes, clarity is in contrast to ambiguity, clarity is in stark contrast to confusion.) He is clear and unique (at least for those who have not read the meditation yet) We acknowledge the abolition of decision based on recognition. Said). However, he often uses terms (eg, "awareness" and its synonyms) to describe determinable decisions with this level of certainty. It translates well into English "knowledge" (and its synonyms). In this article, I refer to "Wax theory" proposed by Rene Descartes and explain that it is a valid discussion, but it is not so rational. In Descartes' claim, he observed a part of the wax from the nest box and analyzed the structure and characteristics of the wax with his judgment and sensation. By doing so he gives the view that wax can not be explained with visual, tactile, or smell, but by heart action to ensure that things are genuine and considered physical objects I can explain. In this discussion, he is trying to explain the difference between judgment and perception. While showing two differences, he revealed the concept of rationalism. The concept of rationalism is based on the definition of the theory of congenital concepts and some general propositions can prove that it applies before or before empirical verification. . Experians believe that perception and sensation are false and misleading.

View of René Descartes' God In 1996, composer João Osbourne sang a song called "One of Us" and was nominated for three Grammy awards. The reason that this song was so successful and interesting is that powerful lyrics are basically asked "What if God is a man?" It is not a supernatural force, it exists in the real world, and how the world changes. Maybe ask yourself, "How does this have to do with the 17th century?" In the 17th century, there is a person named René Descartes. Unforgettable Rene de Carte (1596 - 1650) Rene de Carte is a French philosopher and mathematician. Descartes made a great contribution to the philosophy of rationalism. Descartes' meditation is epoch-making. Because he doubts the previous belief and is trying to prove their validity through logic. Later empiricists opposed Descartes' method, but his philosophy broke many topics for further discussion. Descartes has been proved to be "the existence of God", but his doubt was an important step in promoting the reasons over faith. Descartes also made an important discovery in geometry, calculus and mathematics analysis. From the grounds to the conclusion After examining the origin of Descartes metaphysics, this paper will question the contradiction of the Cartesian law. Rene Descartes started his investigation by doubting all sorts of knowledge, and he further believed that things that might be suspected were completely wrong. Why is the idea of ​​perfection perfect infinitely come true using Descartes' proprietary method? If infinitely perfect God's thought doubts how he can infer the existence of God from this suspicious thinking? My paper is about Rene de Carte's second meditation. In the second meditation, the famous motto of Rene Descartes is "Cogito, Ergo Sum" or "I think this is my favorite" and as I am also, I think the concepts and ideas presented by Rene Descartes I analyzed and decided to criticize. Finding his second meditation is the most controversial and interesting thing in his meditation. The second meditation is the most controversial meditation in Descartes meditation. Because his first question method is explicitly introduced. And this is also his idea of ​​getting radical, because it shows that every kind of knowledge must be criticized and that people have to doubt everything, including himself.

INTRODUCTION Descartes' first philosophy's contemplation is aimed at establishing absolute certainty and "something in a stable, perhaps sustainable science" (meditation I.18). Descartes tried to destroy all his old beliefs and to restructure his foundation from the beginning. He used a series of exaggerated doubts and returned to establish the certainty of all his clear and unique thoughts after denying all the preconceptions he considered ordinary. At first glance, Descartes' philosophical debate seems to be very logical and reliable. The inherent periodicity of Cartesian reasoning is revealed by Arnauld whose objection is called the Cartesian circle. Descartes believes Descartes is based on the fact that Descartes has a clear and definite view of God, but the credibility of the Descartes' clear and unique view is that the fact that God exists rather than a cheater Guaranteed by. Therefore, in order to show the existence of God, Descartes must assume that God exists. Descartes' overall goal is to help humans master and possess nature. He provided an understanding of the tree of the world knowledge trees, flexor optics, meteorology and geometry and established its metaphysical basis in meditation. Then he spent the rest of his life in the field of mechanics, medicine and ethics. Dynamics is the foundation of his physiology and medicine, and this is the basis of his moral psychology. We can track the great importance and influence of Descartes on the development of mind and body dualism and modern skepticism, but he provides many other species for discussion. Descartes, the discussion of wax, the idea of ​​Descartes, the theory of body and perception are important arguments. But he proved that the evidence of the existence of God is not ingenious and not so successful. Descartes is an attractive research topic because you can see the view of the modern world born from his writings. Abstract: Cartesian dualism and combination of thinking and body are often understood as contradictory concepts. In the temporal interpretation, Descartes was believed to be the first dualist (in meditation) and later developed his position for body and mind (passion). Some authors did not find a solution to this problem. Nevertheless, over the past 20 years several explanations have been developed to actively solve the difficult relationship between Descartes dualism and the thought and body combination. The problem I found in most of these problems is to inconsistently describe his concepts of Descartes dualism and union and interaction, by them "weakening" or by "more flexibly" dualism It is trying to do. I developed a synchronous interpretation based on textual evidence to show that dualism and trade unions appear simultaneously in Descartes' work.

Renechet acknowledged the existence of God in one of six meditations of meditation 3, meditation, appeal, answer. Descartes said: "In fact, Descartes believes that there is no choice but to judge the present facts and my existence in my mind, that is, the existence of God." He does not exist by himself, but a higher existence, God, already exists and must create Descartes. In all the suspicions of his belief, Descartes denied that they had even about God. He still doubts the powerful idea of ​​deceiving God. "I believe that the Almighty God has created us, they all have power, but God may not want to deceive me, but it is a disgusting goodness of God In contrast to his tenderness, I am constantly deceived and allowed to be deceived occasionally, but obviously this is allowed. "Descartes does not deceive God's claim , Led the devil's devil. "So it is not a sovereign God, it is not a source of truth, once you could use him to deceive it very powerfully, all the tricks to deceive me" If God exists and he is not a con artist, he will not allow the devil to deceive my idea. In order for the devil to deceive me, God will be as bad as a scammer, but the perspective of Descartes to God is perfect, and God will not deceive me. The devil and the god do not belong to the same entity. According to Descartes, the devil fulfilled the role of a fraudster, confusing my view of the world, and God found me real knowledge. People do not mind being cheated or doing nothing. Therefore, the devil and the god can not exist at the same time. Or the devil is cheating on our view or exists in God. Descartes proves that God exists so that the devil can not exist. Therefore I believe that it is not a true god but a true god, not a true god, the source of sovereignty, evil, devil, not strong, devil. I think that sky, air, earth, colors, shapes, sounds, and all the external things we see are merely illusions and deceit that he took me. (100) We discovered that this evil spirit plays not only on sensory reporting but also on established conclusions about philosophy, mathematics and even common sense. Descartes voluntarily put into the 17th century virtual reality through thought experiments, and his sense told him that everything is genuine. Like Nebuchadnezzar's crew, he noted that reality never questioned whether the reality has the essence of being able to accommodate his explanation; he accepted this with absolute faith It was. I only worried that his explanation was not consistent with the real nature.

Christopher Grau explains the discussion in Descartes' meditation in 'Nightmares, Devils and Experience Machines: Philosophy and Matrix'. People may interpret it as reality, it may just be the imagination of a person. One of the arguments Grau pointed out in the article on Descartes is how people know that the everyday experience that people think is awakening is not part of illusion. Based on the example of a dream, he leads the conclusion based on the experiences encountered while people dream. Devil demons are also called malicious devils and devils, the concept of Descartes philosophy. In the first part of his first philosophical meditation in 1641, Descartes imagined an evil devil. Perfect illusion, so Descartes can say, "I think that the sky, the air, the earth, the color, the shape, the sound and all the external things are just dreams of dreams, he is my judgment I designed them to capture it, eye, body, blood, or feeling, but I mistakenly believe that I have all these things. " Descartes' "suspicion law" includes two well-known expectations, expectations of dreams and expectations of the devil. The dream guess is that in reality everything may be just a dream. Joining the dream speculation is a demonic guess. In essence, this evil devil 's guess is such a concept: If this is just a dream, perhaps evil devils will use these fake realities to deceive our thoughts. So we can not assume that our body and experience exist. essay.com/Rene Explain and comment on his dreams and demons, the way of doubt, and clear and unique trials. Furthermore, his theory (opinion) is bad and good. His explanation about Rune de Carte, deductions of dreams and demons, ways of doubt, and clear and unique trials. Furthermore, his theory (opinion) is bad and good. Descartes argued that the reality around us may be the creation of "devil devil". He said, "Some of the devils that are very powerful and deceitful use all the skills to deceive him all (78)" He said that the earth, sky, personality, and color "dream I believe it might be a dream. Likewise, Matrix was created by a malicious robot with the aim of benefiting humans as batteries. They tie people's minds to the program Matrix. All things, colors and numbers are just "virtual" there. Like Descartes' devil, creators of Matrix deceived people through fantasy fantasy. People of Matrix believe that the materials and events in Matrix are mere "virtual" ones, not authentic. People related to the matrix dream of they living in the matrix, but they actually live in different places they never knew.

In this article we will examine philosophical issues raised in the movie 'Matrix'. It gradually introduces how film problems are directly related to skepticism and physical and mental problems and furthermore how these problems resemble the concepts proposed by Descartes and Plato's philosophy I will explain. That is because many of the questions posed in the movies are a metaphor of the concepts in the work of each philosopher and why these concepts are important to the way they are presented in the movie Let's see. Please refer to Aristotle and Aristotleism, René Descartes and Descartesism, Epicurean and Epicureanism, Religiousism about biographies of the main philosopher of the West and related movement. Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel and Hegelianism, Immanuel Kant and Kantism, Karl Marx and Marxism, Plato and Platonism, Pythagoras and Pythagoreanism. To cover a specific field of Western philosophy, see Aesthetics, Epistemology, Ethics, Thought, Logic, Metaphysics, Biological Philosophy, Educational Philosophy, History Philosophy, Legal Philosophy, Mathematics Philosophy, Mathematics Philosophy. Philosophy Philosophy, Religious Philosophy, Science Philosophy In this article we will examine philosophical issues raised in the movie 'Matrix'. It gradually introduces how film problems are directly related to skepticism and physical and mental problems and furthermore how these problems resemble the concepts proposed by Descartes and Plato's philosophy I will explain. - During the Victorian period, poets were motivated to discuss each other in the fervor of enlightenment. Romanticism and Victorian literature were initially a problem to be accepted. As a Victorian poet, Gerald Manley Hopkins attacks religious ideas by doubting the existence of God. Hopkins' sonnet reflects this problem of oppressive religion through his gorgeous poetry for educating people about the conspiracy of the changing era

Computational complexity and philosophical dualism Abstract: I have studied several recent controversies, including the possibility of mathematical intuitive mechanical simulation. Part 1 addresses the presentation of Lucas-Penrose's position and outlines some basic logical conceptual mechanisms (Godel's proof, Hilbert's tenth question, and Turing's stopping problem). In Part 2 I will explain the main outline of the complexity theory and the concept of Bremerman's transformation and basic limitation. In addition to the dualism that has been discussed (especially Christian and Descartes models), there is a new theory to protect dualism. Dualism of naturalism derives from Australian philosopher David Chalmers (born 1966) I believe there is an explanatory gap between objective experience and subjective experience. It has nothing to do with the physical properties it depends on. According to Chalmers, the naturalistic description of the dualism of nature requires a new basic kind of nature described by the new supernormal rule; before the Maxwell equations, the materialistic mechanical and Newton models are electric I understand the challenge. Resembles Attribute dualism is a philosophical view that two attributes are associated with a substance. According to it, psychological attributes such as desire exist in specific substances such as neurons. This particular doctrine tells us that the world consists of one substance, substance, but there are two different attributes: physics and metaphysics. Therefore, attribute dualism is arguing that the difference in ontology lies in the difference in the nature of the mind and the substance, consciousness being intangible in neurobiology. Essentially, this theory argues that psychological attributes inevitably appear when the problem is organized in an appropriate way. Between 1000 and 600 years, the French philosopher René Descartes laid the foundation for the origin of Descartes' binaryism. In contrast, British philosopher Thomas Hobbes opposed dualism, which supports materialism. Recently, Descartes' dualism and dualism generally lost support. Materialism is a more rational and interpretive theory of the relationship between body and mind. - Both John Rock and Thomas Hobbes believe that men are essentially equal, but their personal view on equality suggests a fundamentally different approach to proper citizenship I guided you to do. Locke believes that the correct form of civilian government should pay attention to the common interests of people and protect citizens' rights to life, health, freedom, and personal property.

St. Akinas defines the existence of God most clearly. St. Anthony and William Perry tried to solve the existence of God, but the weakness of their argument made them feel depressed. Even if St. Anselm was a Christian theologian, he did not incorporate his personal religious belief into his argument. St. Anthony relies entirely on logic and ontology to define the god he constitutes and is defined as an imaginable existence. This definition is sufficiently universal to match the "god" established by each individual. Anselm used Tinker Bell as an example to protect his idea on the premise of reality. Discussion of Rene Descartes on the existence of God Rene Descartes's debate about the existence of God is related to his rationalistic deduction reasoning. Descartes concluded that the truth about the existence of God exists in His idea about the completeness of God and the essence of God (as a complete existence that must exist to be perfect). As a rationalist philosopher, Descartes truncates human knowledge as a product of our sensory data (our senses), but an epistemological sense that our knowledge can be obtained through a process of deducing our own idea I support the position. The medieval society believed that humans existed because God wants them to exist. Descartes does not doubt the existence of God, I doubt that the existence of man is God's desire. He has a problem because he proved the existence of God using a series of theorems. He proved that thought is the essence of thinking. At that time the revolution supports the new idea of ​​"I think myself". It gives independent thinking and free will to human institutions, leading the age of enlightenment. For Descartes, thought proves that our existence is a conscious entity. By solving the survival problem, the thinkers of the 18th and 19th centuries established mathematical and scientific identity. Equivalent thoughts and consciousness do not satisfy thinking thoughts. Beyond the era of reason, we continue to doubt our existence Questions about the existence of God. In the times of Christianity, Judaism, and Muslim, the existence of God has never been questioned. The problem of the existence of God comes from our new way of thinking after these religions. Science reminds us how things work in our world and casts doubt on the existence of God. Because Jesus did not do scientific research in the age of proveing ​​the existence of God, where did history people get the concept of God? Many philosophers The idea of ​​existence of God knows that everyone has one thing, God exists. Everyone agrees with the existence of God, but philosophers like Anselm still try to prove the existence of God. In Prosolgium 's article, Anselm tried to prove the existence of God to Ganillo by giving two ways. The purpose of the dialogue is to prove that it is impossible to accept the existence of God and it is impossible to believe in the existence of God. Proof of Anselm is that God exists. so

René Descartes who is the author of "Meditation 1" wrote that everything he learned is true, that he must believe "to redo from the first foundation" (222). Someone may ask how Descartes has reached this conclusion. The answer is that since he recognizes how wrong it is to think that he (he) is true, how much suspicion he later harbored on these ideas later (222) is. This change happened at the best time in Descartes' life, but he wastes a lot of time to wait for the moment Descartes decided to give it up. The direct confrontation between Stanley Kowalski and Blanche Dubois represents a constant war between conflicts of conflicting values ​​of truth and novel, reality and fancy, ambition and imagination, desire and love. (CLC, 572) Dussenbury believes that marriage between Stanley and Stella is meaningless to Blanche. Because it is based on reality she has never received before. She considers emotional safety and trust as the root of love, but does not recognize the importance of realizing human natural desires. Blanche may have many men and women and seek comfort in the arms of strangers, but she is only seeking temporary relief to evade the fear of loneliness. What she really wants is a person who shares her life and understands her. Fantasy and reality in 'A Midsummer Night's Dream' Shakespeare incorporates commonality in his most comedy, that is, fantasy and reality themes. He used two different settings. A world that represents tough, colorless responsibilities and duties, and a world that represents almost all fantasy worlds considered, that is, where all conflicts are solved magically. A midsummer night's dream is an example of Shake Spear using this printing device. - Cubist viewpoint of Shakespeare's "Midsummer Night's Dream" "The great cycle of the times has been renewed, now justice returns to the golden era; the new generation is coming back from the height now" History is a cyclical phenomenon is. The experience of the times is often repeated in later generations. Knowing this, we should not be surprised to discover that modern style and philosophy seed germinated early.

St. Thomas Aquinas to prove the existence of God is a comparison of St. Thomas Aquinas, one of the greatest theologians ever. He realized that some people doubt the existence of God, as logic does not allow or explain the existence of God. As a devout Christian, he naturally believes in God, but he wants to prove the existence of God to those who can not accept things by faith alone. Therefore there are five proofs that God exists in St. Thomas Aquinas. All evidence is based on natural logic and observation. There is much debate about the existence of God about the existence of God. For a long time everyone wanted to prove the existence of God. Some people think that God exists and is proved by many philosophical or scientific foundations and religious reasons. On the other hand, others do not believe in the existence of God, and their foundation is proved from many theoretical and scientific point of view. Many people try to prove the existence of God with reason. After Descartes proves its existence, people will consider the truth about the essence of God, evidence of the existence of God, and the nature of material objects. The main task in Descartes' meditation is to design a system that allows him to understand the truth. He wants to lay the foundation of all further philosophy The medieval society believed that humans existed because God wants them to exist. Descartes does not doubt the existence of God, I doubt that the existence of man is God's desire. He has a problem because he proved the existence of God using a series of theorems. He proved that thought is the essence of thinking. At that time the revolution supports the new idea of ​​"I think myself". It gives independent thinking and free will to human institutions, leading the age of enlightenment. For Descartes, thought proves that our existence is a conscious entity. By solving the survival problem, the thinkers of the 18th and 19th centuries established mathematical and scientific identity. Equivalent thoughts and consciousness do not satisfy thinking thoughts. Beyond the era of reason, we continue to doubt our existence In this article, I will explain how Descartes uses his existence to prove the existence of God. It is based on "I think that God's thought is in my heart" and "I think so". - First of all, I must say that God believes that he has a universal church, the church of God. To my knowledge, many of the people who claim to be God's saints are not.

Reneekecart was born in 1596. At the age of ten, he began studying at Henri IV IV. Descartes received classical education at the University of Henry IV and studied many subjects including mathematics at the organization of the Jesuits. Many years later he got a bachelor's degree and law degree and then joined the Nassau Morris army. Descartes never participated in the battle, but he had a moment to change his life in the army. While thinking about the uncertainty and inconsistency of knowledge, he has insight on how to make knowledge more reliable and uniform (such as mathematics). Pondering the first philosophy validates Descartes' debate about the existence of God. The purpose of this paper is to explore Descartes' inference and proof of the existence of God. In the third meditation, Descartes presented two arguments to prove the existence of God, a trademark argument and a traditional cosmological argument. His claims are powerful and relatively realistic, but they do not prove the existence of God. At the beginning of meditation, Descartes began to refuse My intention in this article is to demonstrate that the discussion on the existence of God and the fear of deception in Descartes 'First Philosophy' controversy is rather weak and does not prove his conclusion. To support these arguments, we first outline the two concrete meditations and explain the proposed discussion. Later, I criticize his argument and reveal unjust conclusions. Suspicion of text includes features of God's proposal, perfect conditions, and the nature of fraud. The overview includes a discussion on whether Descartes (also called Reinatus) succeeded in his project. Thinking to be the basic text of modern philosophy, meditation of the first philosophy brings up a number of powerful arguments that have influenced the discussion of epistemology, spiritual philosophy and religious philosophy to this day. This new translation includes a revised version of the Latin version of the 2nd edition (1642) and the late French translation (1647) making Descartes' inference as clear and appealing as possible. This version also includes a brief introduction to Andrew Bailey's famous collection, Descartes and Meditation revised and extended from the original philosophy. This introduction will help the reader to understand the background and purpose of the Descartes project. By contemplating the first philosophy, Descartes metaphysics was established. It recognizes his physics, as you can see from the analogy of his tree. In philosophical principles Descartes calculates the fundamentals of physics, and the first part is actually meditation meditation (slightly different). "Principles" are texts which greatly influence the development of modern physics. For example, Isaac Newton (1643-1727) will develop his physics as a reaction to Descartes and use the latter as his own foil. Actually, Newton's Principia (principle) may be called a tribute to Descartes' book. Therefore Descartes' physics (and his metaphysics) are thought to be incorrect, but it plays an important role in the development of modern physics.

From the beginning of the early religious beliefs, people were studying and studying very hard to find religious activities there that could comfort the soul there. People always find someone to worship something. There are still many conflicting religious groups and churches. Religious organizations and people's churches usually have books and some religious laws to survive. Some have even the steps to achieve and please the Lord, so they will not eventually go to hell, nor die from physical death. There is much debate about the existence of God about the existence of God. For a long time everyone wanted to prove the existence of God. Some people think that God exists and is proved by many philosophical or scientific foundations and religious reasons. On the other hand, others do not believe in the existence of God, and their foundation is proved from many theoretical and scientific point of view. Many people try to prove the existence of God with reason. After Descartes proves its existence, people will consider the truth about the essence of God, evidence of the existence of God, and the nature of material objects. The main task in Descartes' meditation is to design a system that allows him to understand the truth. He wants to lay the foundation of all further philosophy How does God exist? Does he exist? Does not he exist? These questions can be discussed in myriad theories that there are reasons why he exists, methods that do not exist, or do not exist, and there is no way to do it. Theologians argue that God exists and there is a reason to believe that God exists. On the other hand, agnosticists, atheists, and believers do not have sufficient reason to believe that God exists. For some people, they have no doubt about the existence of God ... the existence of God was a problem since the concept of God was imagined. Descartes tried to prove the existence of God, argued against his theory of the devil, and showed that there is no doubt that there is some external existence. He is looking for a definite certainty, the foundation on which he founded all of his beliefs and that they are real facts. Descartes' overall project is to find a definite certainty that he can be based on all his knowledge and beliefs. Foundation

In the fifth meditation, Descartes presented his second argument about the existence of God. Because Descartes believes that existence is perfect, it can become a predicate to God. First, I will explain what the ontological argument of the existence of God is. Next, I will explain why Descartes decided to incorporate God into his philosophical approach. As a predicate of God existence reveals some truth about God. Ontology tries to prove the existence of God from a transcendental perspective, that is, God's own concept of embedding human thought. Ontological argument about God's existence The ontological argument is a transcendental argument. These arguments try to prove the existence of God from the meaning of the word God. Anselm of Canterbury introduced an ontological argument to his work 'Proslogion'. The classic argument of Anselm is based on two principles, the most important of which are St. Anselm and Rene de Carte of the above Canterbury. - Cosmological argument tries to prove the existence of God by showing that there are no myriad reasons for the existence of objects. It states that everything must have the last unresolved cause. The reason for this unknown reason is declared to be God. Such discussion is believed to be the reason for understanding us and the existence of the universe. There are several forms of cosmological argument, but basically it is as follows. Like the ontological argument, the cosmological argument, also known as the first factor theory, is a classical argument against the existence of God. However, unlike ontological arguments, we conclude that God exists in the posterior premise (with evidence), as it is based on what is visible in the world and the universe. It shows the first reason behind the existence of the universe. Cosmological arguments are based on chance (depending on other things) and point out that things exist as something caused them to happen. Discussion also points out that things exist, but they do not exist and there are many reasons that can go back in time. Time begins with the birth of the universe formed about 15 billion years ago. Second argument about the existence of God. Because Descartes believes that existence is perfect, it can become a predicate to God. First, I will explain what the ontological argument of the existence of God is. Next, I will explain why Descartes decided to incorporate God into his philosophical approach. As a predicate of God existence reveals some truth about God. Ontology seeks to prove the existence of God from a transcendental point of view

In this article, I will explain how Descartes uses his existence to prove the existence of God. Because "God's thought is in my head" is based on the idea that "I am, I am," I said, "I became my own, because I am from myself, or From parents, (Descal 32, 48) Descartes examines his reasons and shows to him, parents or other reasons that show him to him that he can not lead to his own existence. The theory is a rational idea. Theologians have traditionally used several philosophical evidences to discuss the existence of God. My paper briefly explains the various arguments used to prove the existence of God. These are: cosmology, object theory, ontology, religious experience and evil. These discussions are not always persuasive, but this may explain our perception of the argument. In addition to logic, people reject God most often. However, these discussions do not prove the existence of God, but provide insight you can use to prove the evidence of his existence, but provide some insight. There is much debate about the existence of God about the existence of God. For a long time everyone wanted to prove the existence of God. Some people think that God exists and is proved by many philosophical or scientific foundations and religious reasons. On the other hand, others do not believe in the existence of God, and their foundation is proved from many theoretical and scientific point of view. Many people try to prove the existence of God with reason. After Descartes proves its existence, people will consider the truth about the essence of God, evidence of the existence of God, and the nature of material objects. The main task in Descartes' meditation is to design a system that allows him to understand the truth. He wants to lay the foundation of all further philosophy The medieval society believed that humans existed because God wants them to exist. Descartes does not doubt the existence of God, I doubt that the existence of man is God's desire. He has a problem because he proved the existence of God using a series of theorems. He proved that thought is the essence of thinking. At that time the revolution supports the new idea of ​​"I think myself". It gives independent thinking and free will to human institutions, leading the age of enlightenment. For Descartes, thought proves that our existence is a conscious entity. By solving the survival problem, the thinkers of the 18th and 19th centuries established mathematical and scientific identity. Equivalent thoughts and consciousness do not satisfy thinking thoughts. Beyond the era of reason, we continue to doubt our existence

A number of different philosophers comparing theories of the existence of God have their own theories about the existence of God. They have their own ideas about the way they believe that God is the cause. These philosophers are Anslem, Spinoza and Leibniz. . Anslem is a philosopher who uses ontological thinking to explain the existence of God. The ontological thinking process shows the existence and existence of objects. Anselm's claim is that God is "a real existence and can not even think that it does not exist." There is much debate about the existence of God about the existence of God. For a long time everyone wanted to prove the existence of God. Some people think that God exists and is proved by many philosophical or scientific foundations and religious reasons. On the other hand, others do not believe in the existence of God and their foundation is proved from many theoretical and scientific point of view. Many people try to prove the existence of God with reason. After Descartes proves its existence, he will think the truth about the essence of God, evidence of the existence of God, and the nature of material objects. The main task in Descartes' meditation is to design a system that allows him to understand the truth. He wants to lay the foundation of all further philosophy Since the concept of God was conceived, the existence of God has become a problem. Descartes tried to prove the existence of God, argued against his theory of the devil, and showed that there is no doubt that there is some external existence. He is looking for a definite certainty, the foundation on which he can base on all his beliefs and know that they are real facts. Descartes' overall project is to find a definite certainty that he can be based on all his knowledge and beliefs. Foundation for the existence of God ... God is perfect, almighty, omniscient and can be defined as a creator and ruler considered to be faith and worship for monotheism. Main objectives (1) Many people do not believe any religion. For those who do not believe in religion, there is no reason to believe in God. People who do not believe in God and oppose the existence of God are proving totally wrong. There are many gods

I doubt the way Descartes applies the illusion argument, the dream argument, and the evil genius argument known as the "way of doubt" to achieve his goal: the mind and body are two different substances, It is a perfect separation of the psychological world and the physical world. Once he insisted that he was always awake or sleeping, three in two were always five. Even if a genius of evil has let us down, we may think that 2 plus 3 is 4, but in reality it always has 5, that is always the case. Let's see an example. If I think there are lots of sun outside, I may be wrong with the sun, but I think that it should be sunny and not mistaken. Descartes is trying to create a solid foundation for new science with a skeptical approach. This method should be based on unquestioned things. When Descartes took a skeptical approach, he doubted everything he got from his senses. The strategy adopted by Descartes is to hide his thoughts from things that are completely sure and doubtful. He decided that he should not cheat his existence. If he does not exist, he will not think; therefore, if he is thinking, he must exist. This is the sum of Cogito's ergo, "I think I am". For the first consideration, and for Descartes this is the highest priority. "The heart is better known than the body," Descartes not only proves that his existence is the substance, mind of thinking, but also believes that the body becomes a foreign matter to worry about later. Descartes used his doubt to attack the principles that support everything he believes. The way of doubt is Descartes' basic question method and he doubts there is something there is no reason to doubt. Please think about that. Almost everything you think is true comes from a sense. However, senses sometimes deceive. It is unreasonable to completely trust them because the senses are not completely reliable. But if we assume that our senses are all wrong to us, this is a small belief. In fact, it seems absurd to say such a thing. Still, as Descartes pointed out, we often have the dream that everything we experience is a fiction of our imagination, or at least not a physical one. Therefore it is reasonable to temporarily doubt that our senses convey everything to us.

The existence of God is either God or not. Without an intermediate ground, attempts to maintain neutrality related to the existence of God will automatically be synonymous with distrust. There is nothing wrong with God if there is one, but everything is not important if it does not exist, so this is far from the question "there is no practical meaning". This is a shame for people like me because I always lived in the middle of my absence. So far, I have never been placed in a position to be questioned. There is much debate about the existence of God about the existence of God. For a long time everyone wanted to prove the existence of God. Some people think that God exists and is proved by many philosophical or scientific foundations and religious reasons. On the other hand, others do not believe in the existence of God and their foundation is proved from many theoretical and scientific point of view. Many people try to prove the existence of God with reason. After Descartes proves its existence, he will think the truth about the essence of God, evidence of the existence of God, and the nature of material objects. The main task in Descartes' meditation is to design a system that allows him to understand the truth. He wants to lay the foundation of all further philosophy The medieval society believed that humans existed because God wants them to exist. Descartes does not doubt the existence of God, I doubt that the existence of man is God's desire. He has a problem because he proved the existence of God using a series of theorems. He proved that thought is the essence of thinking. At that time the revolution supports the new idea of ​​"I think myself". It gives independent thinking and free will to human institutions, leading the age of enlightenment. For Descartes, thought proves that our existence is a conscious entity. By solving the survival problem, the thinkers of the 18th and 19th centuries established mathematical and scientific identity. Equivalent thoughts and consciousness do not satisfy thinking thoughts. Beyond the era of reason, we continue to doubt our existence

There was not enough time to develop these observed features for thousands of years, and there was not enough time to explain sediment deposition. Sediment: slow collection of geological structure due to rainfall and runoff erosion, material wear will slowly accumulate in riverbeds and waters. These deposits then pass through the river network as melt loads, suspended loads, or bounces along the river bed (Lutgens & Tarbuck, 2014). When these sediments are carried to the sea, the delta forms a huge stratum that the river and the ocean meet. Earth era: rebellion against skepticism In the history, science has always faced challenges from outside groups. After the heritage of the flat world and the Earth - centered universe, the creationists of the young earth tend to adapt science to their interpretation of the origin of the earth and the timeline. Ancient evidence on the earth exists in every field of the earth science and directly rebuts against claimed assertions. Descartes denied skepticism in 1641. George Berkeley denied skepticism in 1710. Bouwsma denied skepticism in 1949. Hillary · Putnam dismissed skepticism in 1981. The classicist who disputes the skeptical form is Descartes 'meditation' - it also causes famous realism to reject skepticism. Indeed, Descartes is the main inventor of the philosophical cause of skepticism and indispensable to modern philosophy and attention to its understanding. References to Descartes and many other things share Descartes' refutation with refusal of skepticism. Berkeley, Bouwsma, and Putnam provide complex and weakened counterarguments that impair the consistency of skepticism In this article, I will study René Descartes' suspicion and reaction to Britain. Bouwsma and Norman Malcolm Bouwsma and Malcolm argued against criticism of certain parts of Descartes' claim, but I will prove that this is not enough to refute the whole. In order to understand Descartes' argument and sometimes radical view, we need at least a general understanding of the motivation for discussion. The 17th century was an era of advancement of science, the prosperous scientific community was interested in establishing consistent standards to define what science is. Their science is based on a combination of experience and experience, and ideally there is no prejudice to contaminate the results. However, Descartes believes that the sensation is unreliable, and that science based only on sensory information is uncertain.

Descartes doubts experiments and mathematical abstracts: Descartes considers mathematical propositions to be doubtful. Because he believes that all beliefs are derived from perception and examples of questions about the existence of substances. The problem is not to "calculate the actual object or the sky image", but it means "to calculate the amount". Given Descartes' early works, it is possible to see the proposition 2 + against him. 3 = 5 'And' I think so, so I '', this argument is equal Descartes, Hume and skeptical Descartes are in charge of skepticism known as Descartes. Hume criticized this skepticism in his "investigation on human understanding." After discussing Descartes' suspicion, he proposed another type of skepticism that he thought he was more philosophically effective. Hume correctly explains Descartes' suspicion, is his skepticism better? Descartes introduced general skepticism to philosophy. If we believe that what is regarded as "knowledge" must be accepted as information and justified in order to be accepted. Skepticism doubts the verification of knowledge and I doubt how it came to such a conclusion. This is the main problem of skepticism Before deeply living, we need to define the term Descartes skepticism and Cartesian logic. Descartes's skepticism and doubt are derived from Descartes' Descartes and the point of skeptical debate is that we can not know the empirical allegation (Apple etc.) because there is a possibility that we might be deceived is. It has existed in the world for many years and is known by history and colonial companies. Even today, the problem is a form of racial and biopolitical problems in our world. Colonization and colonization and the concept of the difference between the two (another person is human and the other is partial) At first glance, this looks like a clearly defined question. To speak frankly, we can only judge the first person's experience. Cartesian skepticism, fully proposed by Descartes, is remarkably related to perceptual people simulated in the virtual environment. The person performing the simulation is basically a Descartes devil. If you feel that you may be simulating, the only thing you can not suspect is your subjective first person's experience. I want to know what Descartes meant when I talked about his important introduction. As background, I discovered an important part of the Cartesian heritage; Descartes doubts - casts doubt on everything you know. In today's world, this idea seems to be very old-fashioned. We tend to question everything within the scope of skepticism. For Descartes, doubt is the opposite of reason. Descartes' suspicion has made scientific progress possible over the past 200 years. The medieval society believed that humans existed because God wants them to exist. Descartes does not doubt the existence of God, I doubt that the existence of man is God's desire. He has a problem because he proved the existence of God using a series of theorems. He proved that thought is the essence of thinking

Combination of Descartes Dualism and Mind and Body Abstract: Cartesian dualism and combination of thought and body are often understood as contradictory concepts. In the temporal interpretation, Descartes was believed to be the first dualist (in meditation) and later developed his position for body and mind (passion). Some authors did not find a solution to this problem. Nevertheless, over the past 20 years several explanations have been developed to actively solve the difficult relationship between Descartes dualism and the thought and body combination. Descartes' debate about the appearance raises one of the most mysterious questions in his dualistic philosophy: What is the union between the heart and the human body? Thus, Descartes 'dualism established an agenda for philosophical discussion of mind - and - body problems for many years after Descartes' death. Descartes is also a rationalist who believes in the power of natural thinking. Descartes shows the theory of congenital knowledge, and all humans are born through the higher power of God. It was this congenital knowledge theory that later philosopher John Rock (1632-1704) led the opposition to empiricism theory, arguing that all knowledge was obtained through experience. What is so dangerous? In order to find the answer, we need to look back over the "Father of modern philosophy" René Descartes during the 4th century. Together with him, we have created our modern concept of mind and body dualism (later called "Descartes dualism"), whose mind and body are seen as two different substances - spirit and matter - It was. Before Descartes, of course, this idea was supported by churches and other philosophers, but his role was to incorporate it into a prosperous scientific worldview. Regarding Descartes dualism, there are two other ways of viewing, but we believe that we are all natural today. The first is free will. Descartes wrote in his "passion of soul": "Will is inherently free and never limited," he said of all our decisions, our character and our behavior I believe that it comes from our hearts. From our soul. Therefore, we will ultimately bear ethical and other responsibilities for ourselves and our actions.

This article defines Descartes dualism and explains the reaction to Girbert Lyle 's Cartesian dualism against Descartes dualism, critically evaluates and supports Lyle' s assertion on Descartes' material dualism. Descartes dualism is a psychological dualism developed by the infamous René Descartes (1596-1650). Descartes dualism is about entities: he says there are two different entities, body and thought (1). All objects that may exist or may exist are in one of these categories. Oxford philosopher Gilbert Lyle (1900-1976) had another way to explain Plato and Descartes' thought. Lyle expressed Descartes dualism as "category error". As its name implies, category errors include placing something in the wrong logical category. In the case of Lyle, Oxford visitors walked around universities, libraries, laboratories, and teachers' rooms and asked, "Can I see the university?" She saw the university Critique of Descartes' Dualism of Gilbert Lyle. Lile refused to accept the view that the body is only a "machine" operated by an independent "ghost" of human thought, but I thought the two are basically related to one another . In the following decades, this sentence became widely known as philosophy, in particular in 1967 when a book of the same name was published by Arthur Koestler, and finally penetrated mass culture and language. I imagined that the phrase of Lyle can transplant the future of Japanese "ghost" to the "shell" of bio robot and influenced Shirow Masamune's "Ghost Shell" (SF comics and animation) It was. "Shell's ghost problem is what happens to humans when the physical difference between humans and machines is gone.

That is the idea of ​​the Spinnock style of Descartes' judgment. Abstract; Some of Spinoza's critics believe that the idea of ​​Spinonozia is a judgment. As Spinoza is interpreted as responding to Descartes' ideological theory, he considers Spinosian thought to be a Cartesian judgment rather than Cartesian thought, so I call this view a common interpretation. The most obvious difference between Descartes and Spinoza is that descartes considers thinking passive, but Spinoza thinks the opposite is true. A: For clarity, I have never mentioned Descartes linguistics I did. Cover It is related to Descartes (and sometimes influenced by it), but it is often proposed by Descartes critics. Strictly speaking, there is no Cartesian linguistics. As discussed in CL, although the use of the term "concept" of Descartes is not entirely clear, he seems to be using it extensively, so the language expression usually consists of individual It is not a concept but an idea. It is within range. If so, then the language will belong to the concept of his natural tendency - and it is difficult to see how the attributes he mentioned in his language reference are obtained. I want to know what Descartes meant when I talked about his important introduction. As background, I discovered an important part of the Cartesian heritage; Descartes doubts - casts doubt on everything you know. In today's world, this idea seems to be very old-fashioned. We tend to question everything up to the point of skepticism. For Descartes, doubt is the opposite of reason. Descartes' suspicion has made scientific progress possible over the past 200 years. The medieval society believed that humans existed because God wants them to exist. Descartes does not doubt the existence of God, I doubt that the existence of man is God's desire. He has a problem because he proved the existence of God using a series of theorems. He proved that thought is the essence of thinking Discussions in Spinosian language are related to God rather than humans, but the discussion of Descartes is related to humans from Spinoza's point of view. From there build and summarize most of his evidence. Descartes' view on will and intelligence is supported by very reasonable evidence, "I think this is something like". When the will is limited to understanding, I think that Spinoza appears and confidently and clearly confident that things are definite until destroying it with his will, wisdom and essential deductive conclusion I will. I now believe that there are substances with infinite attributes. Each represents an eternal essence.

In 1644, Descartes published "Philosophical Principles" that summarized his physics and metaphysics. He dedicated this work to Elizabeth Stewart who developed him and his moral philosophy, Princess Elizabeth (1618-79), the daughter of the Queen of Bohemia. Descartes believes that mankind is an alliance ... Descartes' philosophical principle (1644; philosophical principle). This shows a deep understanding of the Cartesian system. Spinoza generally accepted Descartes 'physics but he rejected Descartes' metaphysics and opposed the three features: the transcendence of God, the spiritual concept of "spiritual substance" is quite different from substance (Mind - body dualism ). ... Metaphysical mathematical bias of methodological theory and meditation in the human behavior in "Philosophical Principle" (1644) and "Passion of the soul" (1649), and rule of direction of dominant mind (1701) Philosophy (1642) But it is Descartes' meditation is the pursuit of 'first principle' of philosophy. In order for the meditator to understand the principles of philosophy, meditators must decide that they believe they are true and they will never be wrong in their own mind . Therefore, Descartes is using "a suspicious method" as "a sensation-oriented picture trying to abandon criticism of the world critical to the meditator". By using the four phases, Descartes' method can not question any more, please quit your senses to make sure that later it was realy . The philosophical principle (Latin: Principia Philosophia) is a book by René Descartes. Essentially, it is the integration of the first philosophical approach and meditative discourse. Written in Latin, it was published in 1644. It is devoted to Bohemian Elizabeth and has longstanding friendship with Descartes. The French version (Les Principes de la Philosophie) was published in 1647. It explains the principle of nature - the law of physics - as Descartes sees. Most notably, it proposes the principle that the motion of an object is uniform and straight when there is no external force. Newton borrowed this principle from Descartes into his own Principia; to this day it is still known as the Newton's first movement law. This book is primarily intended to replace the course of Aristotle used in the then university of France and the UK. ... Descartes' philosophical principle (1644; philosophical principle). This shows a deep understanding of the Cartesian system. Spinoza generally accepted Descartes 'physics but he rejected Descartes' metaphysics and opposed the three features: the transcendence of God, the spiritual concept of "spiritual substance" is quite different from substance (Mind - body dualism ).

Due to the observed number of cases of brain injury and ongoing progress of neuroscience, this has proven to be strong evidence to support materialism. By defining the meanings of Descartes dualists and materialists' "brains", "minds", "bodies" and "souls", discussions were made on behalf of Descartes dualists, and exactly as "soul" Answer evidence of brain injury. tool". This leads to the conclusion that existence of neuroscience has stronger modern support to materialism, the argument of Descartes dualism may be incorrect. The problem of mind and body is a philosophical question about the relationship between thinking and consciousness in human thinking and the relationship of the brain as part of the body. This problem is based on an interactiveist on the relationship between the mind and the body, so it is different from the psychological and physical effects of the body in chemistry and physiology. Based on the assumption that the mind and body are fundamentally different fundamentally, this problem occurs when the mind and body are considered different. Discovering solutions to mental and body problems For thousands of years the distinction between mind and body was a philosophical material. The simplest form is that mind and body questions try to answer this question. What is the relationship between mind and body? Philosophers, psychologists, and neuroscientists all develop the theory to try to understand the thought, emotion, and place of self-understanding in nature. First investigation of psychological relationship Philosophy of the heart is a field of philosophy to study the essence of mind, psychological events, psychological functions, psychological attributes, consciousness, and relationships with the body. Physical and spiritual problems, the relationship between the mind and the body, there are other problems not related to the essence of the heart, but it is often seen as the central problem of the philosophy of the heart, It has nothing to do with the relationship. Jose Manuel Rodriguez Delgado wrote as follows. "In the current general usage there is no clear distinction between soul and thinking, it can enter and exit the body as an independent entity." For centuries the mental and physical problems were central problems of spiritual philosophy but there are other factors that are related to the nature of consciousness and not related to its ontological relationship with the body. In any case, the philosopher will try to determine thoughts, and even how to influence the body and affect the body. As stated in the Oxford Philosophy Guide, "The problem of the mind and body is to think about the relationship between the mind and the body, or the relationship between the mental state and the process and the relationship between the physical state and the process There is "(Honderich 613)

Skeptical skepticism is one of the themes of the movie "Dark City". Of the skeptical observations observed, four are particularly important. They include cave fables, Descartes' evil genius theory, Ommfalos hypothesis, and simulation hypotheses. The fable of the cave dark city is a perfect example of a cave fable presented by Platon in the form of a dialogue between Socrates and Glaucon. By comparing humans to prisoners in the cave, Plato considers what we see is a shadow cast on the walls, but we misunderstand them as "forms". Dark Knight (Nolan, 2008) Dark Knight is one of the modern and great city movies. Batman and clown (Christian Bell and Heath Leisure) play cats and mice with Gotham's fragmented infrastructure. This is a hot summer of the Bush era, since all templates of Blockbuster and clowns of ledger have been the decisive performance of the 21st century. Serious people (Cohen, 2009) Coen's brothers produced many classics, but this is their masterpiece. A very sad "job" was against the "serious man" in the 1960s, and Michael Stewart played a professional role in exploring Jewish status in American society. Mysterious and evil wonder Skeptical skepticism is one of the themes of the movie "Dark City". Of the skeptical observations observed, four are particularly important. They include cave fables, Descartes' evil genius theory, Ommfalos hypothesis, and simulation hypotheses. 1. The fable of the dark city of the cave is a perfect example of a cave fable presented by Platon in the form of a dialogue between Socrates and Glaucon. By comparing humans to prisoners in the cave, Plato considers what we see is a shadow cast on the walls, but we misunderstand them as "forms". Conclusion about the fable of the cave. However, this movie has a relationship with Plato 's ontology and phenomenon so it is difficult to distinguish between understandable areas and easy to understand areas. Plato's beliefs are interpreted and modernized in the film, proving that Plato's four truths are embodied in the conclusion of his cave fables. Pleasantville helps spectators understand Plato's conclusion from cave fables. Plato first

The universal and universal acceptance of Sir Isaac Newton's model and law is often considered as a matter of course, but it is not always the case. Throughout history, scientists and philosophers established each other's theory to create an improved, often revolutionary model. Newton is neither the first nor the last to bring important innovation to society, but he is one of the most remarkable people; many of his contributions are still in use today. Due to the development of his movement law, Sir Isaac Newton contributed to the collapse of Aristotelianism and provided a universal quantitative system for approximating and interpreting various spatial phenomena and kinematics physics. Great thinkers, Galileo Galilei (1564-1642), Rene Descartes (1596-1650), Sir Isaac Newton (1642-1727) are the main examples of human rationality and conflict between the Catholic Church. Given their ongoing importance and the apparent influence of these thinkers, we thought that asking was important: why are these people and their ideas homosexual? The use of human reasons to understand the existence of the universe and human existence precedes Galileo, Descartes and Newton. Galileo (1564 - 1642) is a German astronomer Johannes Kepler and Italian physicist and astronomer who made scientific revolution and the revolution began with the British physicist Isaac Newton. I work. His primary contribution, born at Galileo Galilee, was to use a telescope in astronomy to observe and discover the four largest moons of the sunspot, moon mountain and valley, Jupiter and Venus. In physics, he discovered the law of falling objects and movement of projectiles. In the history of culture, Galileo is a symbol of the fight against the authority of freedom of power. In 1642 it symbolizes the death of Galileo and the birth of Sir Isaac Newton. Isaac Newton was born on Wool Soap, Britain on Christmas Day. (Http://galileoandeinstein.physics.virginia.edu) This is the birth of a child who later became a British physicist, mathematician, natural philosopher and one of the most important scientists in history. (Encarta Pg.1) Since Newton's father died before he was born, Isaac did not really have the image of his father. When Newton was 3 years old, the mother remarried and Newton was finally brought up by his grandmother. Isaac began attending schools in a nearby town, and Newton was sent to the grammar school of Grantham at the age of ten. When Newton attended school there, he lived with a pharmacist named Clark. Many people say this person may have contributed to sustained interest in Newton's chemistry operations. Isaac Newton entered the Cambridge Trinity College under the emergency of his uncle William Ayscough ("Newton, Sir Isak", Encyclopedia of Mathematics Biography, 394). Newton studied law at Cambridge, but the results were very different. When Newton was at the university, the school's philosophy dominated Aristotle's philosophy. Later, he became more generous at the university third grader, so he started studying the philosophy of Descartes, Galsendi and Boyle. Viete, Descartes, Wallis 'new analytic geometry, and Galileo' s Copernican astronomy dynamics also fascinated him. When Barro arrived in Cambridge's Lucasian chair ("Jazz Isaac Newton", ONLINE), Newton's talent began to grow. Isaac Barrow began to recognize him, soon he became a mentor of Isaac Newton. Under the direction of Isaac Barrow, Isaac Newton began to show his great wisdom. Isaac Newton received a math scholarship!

The physical problem of the mind comes from the early philosopher Descartes who believed that the mind is essentially a mindset and the body is an expansion of the space. Descartes believes that the body affects the perception of the mind, and that the mind affects the behavior of the body. Another early philosopher believed that there was a bi-directional interaction between the spirit and the substance. The three reactions to this long-standing problem in Western philosophy include materialism, dualism and idealism. In order to explore these metaphysical concepts, I went to Tufts University to meet the famous philosopher and cognitive scientist Daniel Dennet who studied consciousness and thought. Dennett's latest book "Bacteria to Bach" shows that the natural part of the development of intelligence is a system that can perform tasks that creators do not know what to do. Creating "The problem is what we have to do, what we ask them to ask them and ask our own standards," he said to me at a dirty office on the university's pastoral campus Said. For example, professor of philosophy at Tufts University Professor Daniel Dennet shared this video with my friend this week. In the video, Dennet talks about the theme of human consciousness, and science tries to answer and provide some questions that have long been solved. That is mainly how we explain the problem of human consciousness. The second naturalistic / mechanical argument is presented in a video by Professor Steven Pinkner who believes that human work does not have a soul (** or the spirit depends on your own definition) As one of the main ideas of the necromantics philosophy, Daniel Dennet compares human consciousness with a series of magic, illusion, according to his definition this is real magic and "real Magic "is true. Illusion This is a very smart way, but this argument is a real magic. It is your distraction - in fact, our ability to accurately perceive the reality is limited and failure does not prove it is wrong for our freedom.

Relationship between Utopian sovereignty and subjectivity, Machiavelli's discourse, and Hobbes' Levi san Thomas Moore, Niccolò Machiavelli, Thomas Hobbes are the sovereign and people in their work. Relationships between models provide model utopia, discourse, and Leviathan. I believe that ensuring common interests of people should be the main goal of sovereign owners. But their explanation for this relationship and their specific interpretation of the sovereign interpretation of people's motive for prosperity are different. Thomas Hobbes, Niccolo Machiavelli Thomas Hobbes and Niccolo Machiavelli are the two best philosophers ever. Hobbes was born in England in 1588 when absoluteism dominated Europe. His most famous work is Leviathan written in 1651. Hobbes discusses the ideal state and innate laws like people and nature. Machiavelli was born in Italy in 1469, the homeland was dominated by foreign forces. - Over time, people always want to know what we become reality. Our human nature has always made us interested in the relationship between ourselves and others. Because this curiosity creates various interpretations of our human nature, each interpretation changes the way we see the social world we live in. Each interpretation brings a new understanding of people and their relationship. Thomas Hobbs wrote Leviathan as evidence of how to operate the country. Indeed, it is very similar to his work with Machiavelli. Hobbes is a monarch whose work reflects absoluteists. His work took place during political instability as it was announced in 1651. His universe philosophy is very basic, but his view on absolute sovereignty and the Commonwealth is wonderful. - Rene Descartes and Thomas Hobbes: Dialogue When people start an incredible journey through meditation in Descartes, there are many doubts, criticisms and seemingly fundamental problems and will interfere with people. progress

"In your philosophy, heaven and earth are more than dreams" (Shakespeare, 211). The quotation from William Shakespeare's "The tragedy of Prince Denmark Hamlet" presents a very good idea. It shows that in our modern philosophy, we are not even pulling out factors leading to the nature of things around us. Our philosophy focuses on the concept of causality. Regardless of whether people are aware of this, every point they claim is based on one reason and / or its influence. This is not necessarily important, but most people are too late to analyze the true relationship between the cause and its impact. David Hume did a wonderful job. David Hume was born in Edinburgh, Scotland. He first studied law at the University of Edinburgh. Hume served as secretary, librarian and embassy staff. David Hume went to France twice. He met Jean Jacques Rousseau, Diderot, d'Hollbach, Turgot, d'Alembert. When Rousseau came to England to find a job. Hume helped Rousseau find a job, and Rousseau could not stick to it for his prosecution. In addition, Hume does not allow us to apply the concept of "knowledge" to natural science. Hume distinguishes between what we call now analytical knowledge and the concept of de facto problems we currently call synthetic knowledge. Analysis, or prior knowledge and integration, posterior knowledge has the truth of two different standards David Hume Hume, David, 1711-76, Scottish philosopher, and historian. Hume brings empiricalism of John Rock and George Berkeley to the logical extremes of fundamental skepticism. He denied the possibility of certain kinds of knowledge and found a series of emotions in his mind and believed that the causal relationship in nature was entirely from B's introduction. The answer to the theme is drawn by the time committee named as illusion by David Hume, and the time committee named human by himself. In the era of modern philosophy, when the influence of Descartes was still important, David Hume brought the argument of killing the Descartes I created and skipping it like a ghost in human perception. You can see not only the theme but also the contrast between Hume and Descartes.

If a person can not distinguish his state of dream and consciousness, then I agreed to Descartes and insisted that he could not get from his sensory knowledge. Because a brilliant dream experience is just work of imagination, treat erroneous beliefs as being wrong. In addition to false beliefs by reason is not enough knowledge of the reason, Descartes intended to show that true faith is a doubt, in the belief that they are equivalent to false beliefs, either of which Suspicious beliefs are irrelevant, relative words, knowledge. Now GE "DEA - My Understanding L - is not popular knowledge but what is more general than (ie, lifestyle) included, it ~ OUG ~ ~ ton :: Instead, known as special knowledge Meld distinction knowledge LAR, local, reglOn ~ 1. I know it is only helpless, thanks to the power of UNAM! '11tr ~ nQ is surrounded by everything ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ & T RRE - Appearance ~ This is mine of me Shelves of these locally disqualified - k borrow it ~, Pu, AR n - RMS it will ORK ~~ ltlCISm perfk the C ~ paradox. ind DESIRE knowledge, In this article, we look for a knowledge knowledge chart platform GRAKN. AI Some of the important aspects represent semantic web and popular (RDF (S) and OWL) separate zones in the form of a model. In fact, we are answering the FAQ "Why does GRAKN.AI implement its own ontology language instead of the existing W3C standard?" This article is intended for readers familiar with formal concepts and ontology work experience modeling. S) and OWL. We are pleased with our community slack channel, this comment section below discussion section, we hope you get as much from our writing. Please keep in touch!

This is because, the idea of ​​God, because Descartes It is believed that prove the existence of God, is that there are external exists is because when you try to prove that there is no room for doubt. He is looking for a definite certainty, the foundation on which he can base on all his beliefs and know that they are true. Descartes' overall project is to find a definite certainty that he can be based on all his knowledge and beliefs. Descartes used his doubt to attack the principles that support everything he believes. Philosophical theory believes that God exists (or must exist) and is independent of the teachings and revelations of a particular religion. Some philosophical controversy philosophical experts that the presence convinced of God through, not required by the reasonable claims, or those who believe that there is to be supported have a religious belief can not be there were. Theological non-recognition doctrine, words such as religious language, especially "God" (the capital) are considered to be cognitively meaningless. It is cited as evidence that there is no such thing as "god", hence it is the basis of atheism. There are two main arguments: Kenilsson uses semantic verifiable theory to conclude that religious languages ​​are meaningless as it proves weak atheism because it can not be proved Weak atheism does not promise the existence of gods and gods, and that Gods and gods should not exist. It is also known as negative atheism or implicit atheism. Due to the absence or lack of evidence that justifies God or God's faith which defines atheism as a series of positions including unbelief, irrational beliefs, suspicion, weak definition of atheism usually gives a broad definition of atheism or Denying theology. Every object in the atomic universe consists of elements that are very small and not destroyed. (This is the case of Western atomism, Buddhists also have perfect atomic theory including instantaneous or eternal atoms. I believe in monotheism, the existence of God, or the match of God. Therefore, the absence of God is different from polytheism, believing in the existence of many Gods, and atheism. Monotheism represents the tradition of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, and the elements of faith are recognized in many other religions. From the 3rd century BC, the war Huns, which lasted along the north of the border was a group of nomads living in ancient northwest border of China. Forward, ultimately weakened the Han dynasty, collapsed in the third century AD. In the case of the Roman Empire, the invasion of various Germanic people (West Goat, East Goth, Bandar) and Huns from the 4th century AD destroyed the west half of the empire in the second half of the 5th century BC. In both cases, internal divisions and / or uprisings exacerbate external threats

God's existence In this article we will explore and analyze the argument about the existence of God. I will examine all the different beliefs about God from Christians. The fields of these beliefs are thoroughly examined and thoroughly analyzed. After that, I will reach my own conclusion and explain my beliefs and reasons. For centuries people have believed in this character called "God". There is much debate about the existence of God about the existence of God. For a long time everyone wanted to prove the existence of God. Some people think that God exists and is proved by many philosophical or scientific foundations and religious reasons. On the other hand, others do not believe in the existence of God and their foundation is proved from many theoretical and scientific point of view. Many people try to prove the existence of God with reason. After Descartes proves its existence, he will think the truth about the essence of God, evidence of the existence of God, and the nature of material objects. The main task in Descartes' meditation is to design a system that allows him to understand the truth. He wants to lay the foundation of all further philosophy The medieval society believed that humans existed because God wants them to exist. Descartes does not doubt the existence of God, I doubt that the existence of man is God's desire. He has a problem because he proved the existence of God using a series of theorems. He proved that thought is the essence of thinking. At that time the revolution supports the new idea of ​​"I think myself". It gives independent thinking and free will to human institutions, leading the age of enlightenment. For Descartes, thought proves that our existence is a conscious entity. By solving the survival problem, the thinkers of the 18th and 19th centuries established mathematical and scientific identity. Equivalent thoughts and consciousness do not satisfy thinking thoughts. Beyond the era of reason, we continue to doubt our existence Questions about the existence of God. In the times of Christianity, Judaism, and Muslim, the existence of God has never been questioned. The problem of the existence of God comes from our new way of thinking after these religions. Science makes us think about how things work in our world and casts doubts on the existence of God. Because Jesus did not do scientific research in the age of proveing ​​the existence of God, where did history people get the concept of God? Many philosophers

"1074 flights from Atlantic City has arrived Please collect all the items and hijack it safely ..." These words sounded in my ear until they jumped out of my seat It was. A little. I was welcomed by a tall Mediterranean at the exit at the slogan "Welcome Angelina". I saw a badge called Andrew's Seal which is a picture of a man in front of me. After taking a taxi, we quickly browsed and began to open right away. In this article we will consider the role of self-deception in Descartes meditation. It is believed that Descartes believes that self-deception is the origin of our misjudgment, but he insists that he is consciously using it to find the truth. He discovered that self-deception is a very effective tool for us to pursue the truth; it expands the ability to be released from our old conviction. Pause them. Therefore, Descartes proposed a first person logical psychological approach to philosophical research. Self-deception plays a very important role there. Cogito is not the first philosophical truth, it should be understood as the first psychological truth. But this is an important step in the study of Descartes philosophy and clarifies the relationship between the logical and psychological aspects of philosophical thinking. Early Christians acknowledged the danger of self-deception. In Matthew, the warning "Do not judge" is actually "deceive yourself before projecting your mistakes on others". At the end of Meme and Selfish Gene, Meme made the term "imitation" to describe the ideas, skills, songs, and cultural behaviors handed down among people through imitation. wait. As the gene itself is the ultimate "beneficiary" of biological evolution, Meme is also a beneficiary of the evolution of meme. Sockpuppet: Sockpuppet is an online ID for fraudulent purposes. This term refers to the operation of a simple doll made with socks. Initially, it means the wrong identity of members of the Internet community who pretended to pretend to be themselves when they pretend to be others. This term includes other misleading online IDs, such as content created for the purpose of praising, advocating or supporting individuals and organizations, manipulating public opinion, and avoiding stopping or prohibiting Web sites Use is included. Although it is regarded as an evil term in society, fraud is an exciting and horrible, important part of a wise mystery novel. Mrs. Agatha Christie succeeded in creating a novel and asked people to think about the outcome. She shaped the fraud into an artistic form, she is Micae Langiero or Picasso

David Hume is an insightful philosopher and thinker and has shown us the problems we are constraining and what we are making the human nature a reality. Specifically, Hume is trying to persuade us to understand the facts. In this fact, we are based on life, form the custom on certain matters, and we are surrounding How do you adapt to the other things? After all, we do not know how things develop We can only assume past experiences, things will be customized and become customary through causality and casual language. David Hume Hume, David, 1711-76, Scottish philosopher, and historian. Hume brings empiricalism of John Rock and George Berkeley to the logical extremes of fundamental skepticism. He denied the possibility of certain kinds of knowledge and found a series of emotions in his mind and believed that the causal relationship in nature was entirely from B's introduction. The answer to the theme is drawn by the time committee named as illusion by David Hume, and the time committee named human by himself. In the era of modern philosophy, when the influence of Descartes was still important, David Hume brought the argument of killing the Descartes I created and skipping it like a ghost in human perception. You can see not only the theme but also the contrast between Hume and Descartes. Our recognition and memory The famous philosophers David Hume and Rene Descartes are those who are looking for answers and definitions of individual identity. Both of them considered their ideas and issued two different conclusions. Some people think that individual identity can not be understood, but others confirm that their certainty is their thinking and perception. David Hume begins discussing personal identity by denying this David Hume is studying physical and mental problems. Hume also investigated the person's character, the relationship between humans and animals, and the nature of the agent. Hume pointed out that we tend to think we are the same person five years ago. We have changed in various ways, but the same person appears there. You can start thinking about which functions can be changed without changing the fundamental self. However, Hume denies that there are differences between the various features of people and the magical self that is said to have these characteristics. "In addition to specific awareness, we will never pay close attention to anything - human beings are turning at incredible speed, a bunch or collection of different cognitions in constant flow and movement "

Discussion about the existence of God A lot of people around the world are confused about all these real starts. Many people believe that Immortal God has created everything, including humans and animals. In this article I will discuss various ways people try to prove the existence of God and suggest that there is no debate like God exists. As to the existence of God, the view differs depending on the person. Believing in the effect of omni, everyone who knows all the love (the kindness of omni) (omnians) is called Theists. There is much debate about the existence of God about the existence of God. For a long time everyone wanted to prove the existence of God. Some people think that God exists and is proved by many philosophical or scientific foundations and religious reasons. On the other hand, others do not believe in the existence of God and their foundation is proved from many theoretical and scientific point of view. Many people try to prove the existence of God with reason. After Descartes proves its existence, he will think the truth about the essence of God, evidence of the existence of God, and the nature of material objects. The main task in Descartes' meditation is to design a system that allows him to understand the truth. He wants to lay the foundation of all further philosophy Second argument about the existence of God. Because Descartes believes that existence is perfect, it can become a predicate to God. First, I will explain what the ontological argument of the existence of God is. Next, I will explain why Descartes decided to incorporate God into his philosophical approach. As a predicate of God existence reveals some truth about God. Ontology seeks to prove the existence of God from a transcendental point of view

Francis Bacon's scientific revolution Utopia New Atlantis was a utopia painted by Francis Bacon in the 17th century. In this novel, Francis Bacon continues to study more utopian ideas. However, unlike others, Bacon relies more on scientifically progressive societal changes and understanding of its own environment than religious reform and social legislation. The 17th century was an era of dramatic social change in history. However, this change is not political or technical, it is religious. Francis Bacon (1561 - 1626) is a British scientist and lawyer. Bacon is a tool of Renaissance and scientific enlightenment. In particular, Bacon has developed and promoted scientific approaches based on well-organized scientific approaches that demonstrate evidence, results, and new scientific rigors. He is widely regarded as the father of empiricism and the father of the scientific revolution of the Renaissance. Bacon was born on January 22, 1561, near Strand of London, England. At the age of 12 he entered Cambridge's Trinity College where he traced the traditional medieval course, mostly in Latin. He admired Aristotle, but he admired Aristotle's philosophical approach (he called this "useless") and an academic tradition undoubtedly accepting past assumptions about classical teachers like Asia Criticized. Richmond and Plato Francis Bacon (1561-1626) British philosopher, politician, speaker and scientist. Bacon is considered to be "father of empiricism" for his work in the study of scientific phenomena and his work in advancing scientific methodology and structured scientific exploration. He encourages his own example and philosophical experience. An important figure in the scientific revolution of the 17th century. Rene de Carte (1596 - 1650) Rene de Carte is a French philosopher and mathematician. Descartes made a great contribution to the philosophy of rationalism. Descartes' meditation is epoch-making. Because he doubts the previous belief and is trying to prove their validity through logic. Later empiricists opposed Descartes' method, but his philosophy broke many topics for further discussion. Descartes has been proved to be "the existence of God", but his doubt is an important step in promoting reasons over faith.

Scientific methods are standardized procedures that scientists should follow when conducting experiments to construct reliable, consistent, and not optional environmental representations. Following scientific methods is the order in which the experiment is observed. First, scientists must observe the phenomena of interest. Next, scientists need to come up with hypotheses, or experiment-based ideas. Then by repeating the experiment, the hypothesis can prove to be wrong, and it can also become a theory. Over the past several hundred years the success of scientific methods has demonstrated that humans can at least partially overcome their cognitive bias. The scientific method is aimed at offsetting our cognitive bias, which gives us a very intuitive conclusion about how the universe functions. Imagine that it is contrary to the intuition that the earth is circling the sun. That everyone can see for millions of years is how easy it is to believe that the sun 'is crossing the sky' every day. Think of our ancestors first that we must understand that many diseases are caused by intangible things called bacteria. These examples show that our intuition is often proven wrong. This is a valid reason for many aspects of learning problems. All scientific fields are unified through the use of scientific methods. The scientific method provides an objective way for scientific experiments to enable fair interpretation and sophistication of the world. Sir Francis Bacon (1561 - 1626) first outlined scientific methods and enabled logical and rational problem solving in many scientific fields. In all scientific fields, the main principles of scientific methods are verifiability, predictability, tampering and fairness. Francis Bacon (1561-1626) British philosopher, politician, speaker and scientist. Bacon is considered to be "father of empiricism" for his work in the study of scientific phenomena and his work in advancing scientific methodology and structured scientific exploration. He encourages his own example and philosophical experience. An important figure in the scientific revolution of the 17th century. Rene de Carte (1596 - 1650) Rene de Carte is a French philosopher and mathematician. Descartes made a great contribution to the philosophy of rationalism. Descartes' meditation is epoch-making. Because he doubts the previous belief and is trying to prove their validity through logic. Later empiricists opposed Descartes' method, but his philosophy broke many topics for further discussion. Descartes has been proved to be "the existence of God", but his doubt is an important step in promoting reasons over faith.

In Descart's cosmology, each star is located in the center of a "swirl" or a huge circulating fluid pool. The stars and swirls are humans, exist, and leave existence. Since stars like the sun are covered with sunspots, it becomes a comet from a vortex to a vortex and other solar system. Then, with more exterior, it develops into a planet like the earth with mountains, oceans and minerals. As a major supporter of mechanical philosophy, Descartes seeks only to explain all the properties, including gravity and magnetism, by referring only to matter and movement, not attracting hidden power. Regarding the first philosophy including his metaphysical view. He developed his physics based on metaphysical principles, especially the principle of immutability of God. Shortly after contemplation, he announced the philosophy of philosophy (Cartes 1644). This is a work that contains his physical idea in a systematic way. This book can be regarded as a textbook of Cartesian physics. Descartes wrote in a letter to Constantijn Huygens that "principle" simply translated "World News" into Latin. Indeed, the contents of these two works duplicate in many respects. Similar to the principle, Le Monde contains collision theory based on three natural laws, but they are all based on the description of the solar system based on the gravitational theory of vortices. However, comparing the two works in detail, it turns out that Descartes has changed some of his views and clarifies other points. His crash theory became more detailed, and Copernicus' theory retired behind the scenes. The philosophical principle (Latin: Principia Philosophia) is a book by René Descartes. Essentially, it is the integration of the first philosophical approach and meditative discourse. Written in Latin, it was published in 1644. It is devoted to Bohemian Elizabeth and has longstanding friendship with Descartes. The French version (Les Principes de la Philosophie) was published in 1647. It explains the principle of nature - the law of physics - as Descartes sees. Most notably, it proposes the principle that the motion of an object is uniform and straight when there is no external force. Newton borrowed this principle from Descartes into his own Principia; to this day it is still known as the Newton's first movement law. This book is primarily intended to replace the course of Aristotle used in the then university of France and the UK.

Nietzsche, Marx, Kiakegaard and Zarastura are always the most popular, and the voice of God disappears throughout the mountains. Please reevaluate our idols and discover the relationship between the importance of their abolition and the complex network that we create for our lives. Zarathustra, his sacred character, opened up a new era, the last person was eradicated and the dirty pests were camouflaged as a promise of cheese. The world was filled with mouse traps and it was a crazy place full of faces they could not understand. This demolition of rationalist philosophers like Descartes is strongly influenced by Nietzsche, Marx, Kierkegaard, Foucault. After philosophical synthesis of these philosophers, the review of Descartes is surprising, and this work is considered glorious fame. Rene Descartes is thought to be the founder of analytical geometry, an important contributor to scientific methods, and finally a philosopher. But the philosophical review of the logicologist showed that his analysis lacked some legitimate content and tried to reach the truth but only attempted to realize the belief. This understanding and conclusion reveals the ambiguity of Descartes' philosophy and pleads to condemn him as a philosopher of glory (although he did not mention mathematicians). The term "existentialism" derives from the tradition of "existentialism" such as philosophers Blaise Pascal, Immanuel Kant, SørenKierkegaard, early in Karl Marx, Friedrich Nietzsche, Martin-Heidegger, Jean-Paul Sartre, Simone de Beauvoir It has a specific philosophical meaning. Maurice Merlot-Ponty and Albert Camus and writer Fyodor Dostoevsky and Franz Kafka SørenKierkegaard, Friedrich Nietzsche, Fyodor Dostoevsky are considered existentialists, but in fact were created by Jean-Paul Sartre. It is widely believed that Kierkegaard may be the first surviving philosopher, but he used the term "individualism" to refer to his philosophical thought. When reading a sentence, it is easy to understand why it is closely related to existentialism. Kierkegaard wrote to his book "Deadly Sick" as follows. Other losses can not occur so quietly; other losses - arms, legs, $ 5, wives etc - will definitely be noticed. "

Discussion on prayer and God's existence In order to answer this question balancedly, we need to see the views of Christians and atheists from the perspective of their belief in the existence of God. I can not prove whether God exists. One argument about the existence of God is that the universe is accidentally unlikely to be orderly and completely designed; there must be a creator. This is called a theoretical theory or "design theory". There is much debate about the existence of God about the existence of God. For a long time everyone wanted to prove the existence of God. Some people think that God exists and is proved by many philosophical or scientific foundations and religious reasons. On the other hand, others do not believe in the existence of God and their foundation is proved from many theoretical and scientific point of view. Many people try to prove the existence of God with reason. After Descartes proves its existence, he will think the truth about the essence of God, evidence of the existence of God, and the nature of material objects. The main task in Descartes' meditation is to design a system that allows him to understand the truth. He wants to lay the foundation of all further philosophy The purpose of this paper is to study Descartes' discussion about the existence of God. First I will consider the evidence of the existence of the Descartes God. Then I will discuss the reason why Descartes prove the existence of God. We also discuss some of the influences of the existence of God. Finally, I will point out some complications and problems in the evidence. The main problem of most religions in the world was that they presupposed faith; this is a person who can not be understood as believing religion. The main evidence of the existence of God in any particular religion is that the Bible tells us about his existence and power - whatever it is. Then we just believe these scriptures. Because we think they come from God. This is a circulation theory and can not be used as evidence.

Exploring the various theories concerning mind and body problems I will try to do this by first judging what kind of ideas and bodies are talking about physical and mental problems. Third, we explain the existing method of discussing the problem, and finally the advantages and disadvantages of that method. The body is the body we think that we are related to sensation. It usually includes arms, feet and head. Thoughts are responsible for their thoughts and emotions, and there is reasonable ability. However, if we say that the mind and body are two different, independent ones, we are not superior to machines and robots. The idea of ​​Cartesian theory forms a physical and mental problem. So what is the physical and mental problem? The problem is how the body and the mind are related to each other. According to Descartes' philosophy, the mind is a kind of thought and the body is an extension. These two are somewhat correlated. In order to answer this question, Descartes formed a philosophical theory called dualism. According to the dualism of Descartes, the body and the mind are interdependent. The body needs a mind to respond to them and tell them what to do, the mind needs a body as a purpose to express our thoughts. But, if we say that we are connected to each other, where is the connection between the mind and the body? There must be some relationship between the mind and the body. I think that certain things affect our body and vice versa. In the dualism philosophy of the mind and body, the mind and body are theories of all kinds of matter and nature. This position means that thinking and body have different meanings, but also different types of entities. Therefore, binaryists identify the brain and oppose the theory considered as a physical mechanism. The contemporary problem of the relationship between the mind and the body comes from the philosopher and mathematician René Descartes' thought of the 17th century and gives a classic expression of dualism. Starting with the sum of his famous Cogito, ergo (Latin: "I think so, so I am"), Descartes developed the mind theory as a non-material, nonexpandable substance. Activities such as rational thought, imagination, emotion, motivation

The existence of God The existence of God is a very hot debate. Whether God exists or not is a problem, 1000 people are seeking for themselves, and we are constantly seeking evidence to believe their existence. Philosophers try to provide reasonable evidence of God's existence beyond the declaration of self-righteousness. I personally trust his existence in a decisive way. I chose this theme based on 5 questions; first, everyone asks if they have something. There is much debate about the existence of God about the existence of God. For a long time everyone wanted to prove the existence of God. Some people think that God exists and is proved by many philosophical or scientific foundations and religious reasons. On the other hand, others do not believe in the existence of God, and their foundation is proved from many theoretical and scientific point of view. Many people try to prove the existence of God with reason. After Descartes proves its existence, people will consider the truth about the essence of God, evidence of the existence of God, and the nature of material objects. The main task in Descartes' meditation is to design a system that allows him to understand the truth. He wants to lay the foundation of all further philosophy The medieval society believed that humans existed because God wants them to exist. Descartes does not doubt the existence of God, I doubt that the existence of man is God's desire. He has a problem because he proved the existence of God using a series of theorems. He proved that thought is the essence of thinking. At that time the revolution supports the new idea of ​​"I think myself". It gives independent thinking and free will to human institutions, leading the age of enlightenment. For Descartes, thought proves that our existence is a conscious entity. By solving the survival problem, the thinkers of the 18th and 19th centuries established mathematical and scientific identity. Equivalent thoughts and consciousness do not satisfy thinking thoughts. Beyond the era of reason, we continue to doubt our existence

For thousands of years, the mystery of consciousness has plagued humanity. We feel pain, hunger and other countless feelings, but this is a fact. We all know that we are conscious, but nobody has found out whether the human body is organized in a specific way leading to consciousness. The fact is that the existence of consciousness, the nature of knowledge can not be denied, regardless of the lack of a specific systematic de facto organization to explain it. According to Stanford University Philosophy Encyclopedia, David Hume (1711-1776) is a Scottish philosopher known for her reputation as an essayist. He is an influential empiricist, a human being is a group of people who do not have a true self (this is called the theory of deterrence), and morality is not based on moral principles but based on emotion I will. Isaac Newton (1642-1727) is a British mathematician and physicist who built the foundations of classical mechanics and calculus. According to data from the Isaac Newton Institute of Mathematical Sciences, Newton developed a movement and universal gravity law that improved understanding of the world of Copernicus. B. Introduction of David Hume's "Bundle" The outline of the theme (written as a response to Descartes) is drawn by a time council named David Hume as an illusion, and humans name it self. In the era of modern philosophy, when the influence of Descartes was still important, David Hume brought the argument of killing the Descartes I created and skipping it like a ghost in human perception. You can see not only the theme but also the contrast between Hume and Descartes. General Concept Study This busy term decided to focus on David Hume and W. K. Clifford Theory. David Hume is a very famous philosopher and takes the approach of attacking certain items he has strong opinions. He is a philosopher who attacks us as a simple thing that humans accept and gradually believes over time. First we start with his vision of David Hume and induction and generalization law. Then we will enter W. K. Clifford "I belong to (278) Then I will detail the criteria outlined by lock to explain the concept of persistent self.If you hurry from lock inference, I will introduce David Hume's self-concept as a bunch of ideas The juxtaposition of the self-essential proposition shows that John Rock's persistent self-view is flawed in considering David Hume's self-concept.

The education of Giambattista Vico and "Heroes of Mind" abstracts humanities. This is also the key to understanding his humanitarian criticism of Descartes epistemology. This paper examines the concept of Vico's heroic thought revealed in Demente heroica Oration in 1732 and discusses the essence of Vico's challenge to Descartes' human view and knowledge, and Vico is aware of the concepts of thought, education, and knowledge Development From his early works. In Italy in the early 18th century, thoughtist Giambattista Vico is regarded as a pioneer of all ethnological writers or human societal studies based on traditional academic foundations, especially based on law and philosophy . A clear example of human creative imagination in the formation of unique myths on a continuous cultural stage. His work is most prominent in his Scienza nuova (1725; Giambattista Vico's new science) and does not affect his own century. On the contrary, the myth of infidels is a new view of the distortion of the Biblical revelation (first represented in the Renaissance). Nevertheless, the philosophy of enlightenment, the journey of discovery, and the report of the missionary teacher (in particular the North American Indian description by the Jesuits) contributed to the improvement of academic research and objectivity. The education of Giambattista Vico and "Heroes of Mind" abstracts humanities. This is also the key to understanding his humanitarian criticism of Descartes epistemology. This paper examines the concept of Vico's heroic thought revealed in Demente heroica Oration in 1732 and discusses the essence of Vico's challenge to Descartes' human view and knowledge, and Vico is aware of the concepts of thought, education, and knowledge Development From his early works.

In the meditation of the first philosophy, Descartes achieved a valuable goal: discovering the source of doubt, and the final result was a more serious view, argument and argument. Descartes is far beyond his age and has opened up a path to a more rigorous scholarship due to his "opinion" suspicion. Unfortunately, Descartes can not doubt or doubt the main cause of his credibility. Discussed three meditations of Descartes. His first meditation was called "meditation I: suspicious thing". In this meditation, Descartes recalls that he was deceived by his feeling, and that it has been happening since then, and that may also happen. So he told himself that my beliefs were dangerous and uncertain if I were deceived. It is the recognition of the first meditation that is called the second meditation "meditation II: about the essence of the human mind: it is known better than the body". Descartes believes that he must be present because he is "thoughtful". He can be deceived and can possess ideas and beliefs, so he must exist. His third meditation "Meditation III: About God, He is present" believes that God exists and he rejects the idea that God was invented. He proposed three perspectives; innate, factual and accidental. Descartes believes that God is a natural idea, he is not improvised In the first meditation, Descartes questioned the five senses, and in Meditation 6, we confirmed that the senses are not to provide knowledge about the "essence" of external but (7: 83). In this work, he should consider several "simple essences" related to material matters through sensory images, because they should be considered (10: 383, 417). ) In meditation, he believes that the essence of matter can be understood by natural thought and not related to any sensory image (7: 64-5, 72-3). In this respect, his late position is consistent with Plato's philosophical tradition that respects sensory knowledge, and I believe what knowledge is known is more realistic than sensory objects. But Descartes is not a platoon, we will return to this. His attitude towards a mature sensation has not declined completely

Descartes presented a debate about the existence of God in the third meditation entitled "God: He is present." Meditation III describes the truth and how to justify it. Descartes admits suspicion about the body, but he is absolutely convinced that he is present, and he is clearly and clearly aware of this fact. As he confirmed: I am a thought (conscious), a person who understands something, affirmations, denials, something, and knows nothing about many people, - [love, hatred], will, rejecters Please also imagine. Several important arguments from meditation III-V I. Third meditation: God presence A. Cosmological evidence of the existence of God In the third meditation, Descartes says that God (i) exists, ( The essence of being a creator of thinking), and (iii) the reason why the meditator exists (even if it exists at another moment from one moment). The premise of the existence of God is that each of us understands the following clear and unique concept of God. Descartes presented a debate about the existence of God in the third meditation entitled "God: He is present." Meditation III describes the truth and how to justify it. Descartes admits suspicion about the body, but he is absolutely convinced that he is present, and he is clearly and clearly aware of this fact. As he confirmed: I am a thought (conscious), a man who knows doubt, affirmation, denial, purpose and nothing about many people ... ... ... power. Weaknesses and Opposing Opinions There are advantages and disadvantages to Anselm's claims, others oppose his argument. Anselm 's claim depends only on logical reasoning to prove that his evidence on the existence of God is correct. As he made his argument very strong, he was an "idiot" or a shameless person and accepted the definition given by Anselm to begin his argument. The words used by Anselm in giving his arguments and evidence highlight this argument. In meditation 3, Descartes summarized his meditation so far and categorized his thoughts. The main element of the third meditation is the trademark theory of God's existence. Several ideas such as unicorns and mermaids are born, or basically within us, but others are not. Descartes' claim is that human beings are born with the concept of inherent nature, which God has attached to us "his trademark". Descartes' fourth mediation focused first on whether God is a liar, followed by a clear and unique idea afterwards. Intentional fraud is only performed by incomplete (not complete) existence. Because God is perfect, God is not a crook. Descartes wrote that his judgment comes from God and that he will not make mistakes if correctly used. Only when you decide that you do not know, you can make a mistake. Consideration on "Descartes meditation - the theme of the first philosophical meditation"

There are two main thoughts or methodologies on the subject of epistemology: rationalism and empiricism. These two completely different schools of thought are trying to answer philosophical questions about how to acquire knowledge. Rationalists believe that this process is entirely within our head, but experientists believe that it will be achieved through sensory experience. After reading and understanding each discussion it is clear that empiricism is the most relative descriptive position in epistemology. Empiricalism is an excellent position in discussions of empiricism and rationalism. Renedecart supports rationalism. That is acquiring knowledge by reason. David Hume supports empiricism and knowledge after experience through experience. Both positions have strong debate. Descartes warns that "something is genuine, I do not understand it is such thing." Descartes believes that it is necessary to "assure that rationality is used for everything" in order to obtain true knowledge. Hume, on the other hand, believes that the connection of ideas is our knowledge. He explains this empirical approach, using three principles of relationship between ideas, ie similarity, time or place continuity, causality. Hume believes that we associate these ideas in our mind with the ideas we gained through experience. Essay.com/a Thesis using direct citation of Hume and Descartes to demonstrate positivism against rationalism For a long time philosophers have intensely discussed the classification of philosophical epistemology into two categories: rationalism and empiricism. We believe that empiricism can acquire knowledge only by observing facts or by experimenting, but rationalism gains knowledge through logical reasoning. Rationalism and empiricism are themselves a very viable way of thinking in philosophy, but the arguments of these philosophical schools become more powerful when combined. Then, please argue, rationalism and empiricism, sum. The fact that philosophers can be rationalists or empiricists was traditionally used in the classification system commonly used in the history of philosophy, especially Kant's description in the first half of the 17th to the 17th century It affects the classification system. . Therefore, Descartes, Spinoza, and Leibniz were erroneously regarded as applying rational core epistemology to a common metaphysical agenda, Rock, Berkeley, and Hume erroneously reached a gradual rejection of their metaphysical claims It was regarded, and everyone consciously tried to improve his predecessor's efforts.

When answering questions about God, the argument of evil is a very unique argument. Most of the discussions we deal with are trying to prove the existence of God. On the other hand, this argument tries to do the opposite, and I really emphasize the word try. Another reason I think it is special is that it is not just a parameter but a series of three parameters. In my opinion, this argument is fairly weak, not to prove what its purpose is but to disagree. There is much debate about the existence of God about the existence of God. For a long time everyone wanted to prove the existence of God. Some people think that God exists and is proved by many philosophical or scientific foundations and religious reasons. On the other hand, others do not believe in the existence of God, and their foundation is proved from many theoretical and scientific point of view. Many people try to prove the existence of God with reason. After Descartes proves its existence, people will consider the truth about the essence of God, evidence of the existence of God, and the nature of material objects. The main task in Descartes' meditation is to design a system that allows him to understand the truth. He wants to lay the foundation of all further philosophy The medieval society believed that humans existed because God wants them to exist. Descartes does not doubt the existence of God, I doubt that the existence of man is God's desire. He has a problem because he proved the existence of God using a series of theorems. He proved that thought is the essence of thinking. At that time the revolution supports the new idea of ​​"I think myself". It gives independent thinking and free will to human institutions, leading the age of enlightenment. For Descartes, thought proves that our existence is a conscious entity. By solving the survival problem, the thinkers of the 18th and 19th centuries established mathematical and scientific identity. Equivalent thoughts and consciousness do not satisfy thinking thoughts. Beyond the era of reason, we continue to doubt our existence

The existence of God I have believed in God since I remembered it. I always thought that he existed in a way that we do not understand or understand. It is spiritual (all powerful) things. Because if he is omnipotent he can go in the way he thinks fit. Too much. Not only in the spirit of the spirit but also in the material nature to enhance my beliefs about the existence of God, a lot of things happened to me. There is much debate about the existence of God about the existence of God. For a long time everyone wanted to prove the existence of God. Some people think that God exists and is proved by many philosophical or scientific foundations and religious reasons. On the other hand, others do not believe in the existence of God and their foundation is proved from many theoretical and scientific point of view. Many people try to prove the existence of God with reason. After Descartes proves its existence, he will think the truth about the essence of God, evidence of the existence of God, and the nature of material objects. The main task in Descartes' meditation is to design a system that allows him to understand the truth. He wants to lay the foundation of all further philosophy The medieval society believed that humans existed because God wants them to exist. Descartes does not doubt the existence of God, I doubt that the existence of man is God's desire. He has a problem because he proved the existence of God using a series of theorems. He proved that thought is the essence of thinking. At that time the revolution supports the new idea of ​​"I think myself". It gives independent thinking and free will to human institutions, leading the age of enlightenment. For Descartes, thought proves that our existence is a conscious entity. By solving the survival problem, the thinkers of the 18th and 19th centuries established mathematical and scientific identity. Equivalent thoughts and consciousness do not satisfy thinking thoughts. Beyond the era of reason, we continue to doubt our existence

Second meditation "The first rumor will never accept real things until I know it without a doubt." He seduced us to a well-known mistake, such as how the size of a distant tower was misunderstood. Next, a deeper consideration of how unidentified dreams and reality are, provides a good reason to abandon all the reasons he thought previously was true. My paper is about Rene de Carte's second meditation. In the second meditation, René Descartes' famous motto is "Cogito, Ergo Sum" or "I think I like this", as I also do. Finding his second meditation is the most controversial and interesting thing in his meditation. The second meditation is the most controversial meditation in Descartes meditation. And this is also his idea of ​​getting radical, because it shows that every kind of knowledge must be criticized and that people have to doubt everything, including himself. In meditation, Descartes changed the structure of discussion. With a second meditation he decided that he could not doubt whether he thought he was, but he was able to doubt the existence of the substance. However, he explicitly refused to use this situation to conclude that his mind is different from his body because he does not yet know his personality (7: 27). And in the sixth meditation he set up a sign of truth to satisfy himself. It is an extension and we can not consider what can not be expanded (7: 78). He is not based on this argument on the fact that he can doubt the existence of either, but based on clear and unique knowledge about thought and the nature of matter. In the fifth meditation, Descartes once again returned to the matter of matter and God. Please note the title. As in the second meditation, Descartes considered the nature of matter without solving the question of whether substance exists or not, like the second meditation, "The essence of material things, and the second time God exists." Like the third meditation, Descartes thinks of both the nature and existence of God and thinks of a new twist. Descartes believes that if you do not know that God exists, you can not know the essence of God. God is natural that means the existence of that existence. This is an ontological argument about the existence of God.

The overall purpose of René Descartes in promoting "methodological discourse" is to develop a new prejudice-free knowledge system that was used previously to determine the truth of things. The fourth part of the book explains the philosophical basis (meditation) for building a new system. These meditations are based on rationalistic epistemology theory. If someone really understands something, they will not be misunderstood. He kept a firm debate over his idea. Liberalism dates back to the early 17th century and the French philosopher René Descartes (1596 - 1650). Bertrand Russell believes that the idea of ​​Decartes is "I am, I am like this," which is the starting point for individuals' unimaginable ideas. This proposition casts doubt on the foundation of society, so it is highly convincing in certain historical times. These foundations are the interpretation of the world by the church and its moral leadership, the sacred right of the monarchy, and the dynamics of the social order. Descartes creates a revolutionary way of thinking The twentieth century addressed the dramatic change in a series of conflicts based on knowledge in philosophical discourse, overthrow of classical certainty, and new social, economic, scientific and logical problems. The philosophy of the 20th century was a series of attempts to reform, save, change and abolish the old knowledge system. Highlights include Bertrand Russell, Ludwig Wittgenstein, Edmund Husserl, Martin Heidegger and Jean-Paul Sartre. The publication of Husserl's logic research (1900-1) and Russell's mathematical principle (1903) is considered the beginning of the philosophy of the 20th century. In the 20th century, this field has been increasingly specialized, and the modern (contemporary) philosophical era has also begun. In the methodology (1637) announced in meditation several years ago, Descartes revealed the title as a special choice of discourse type. In the letter to Mersenne, he once again did not intend to "argue it instead of teaching this method", he says that he included "discourse" rather than "discourse" in the title Told. ) In another piece, I did not publish it in his life, we learned that Descartes was working on another famous type, even dialogue - looking for truth through natural light

God's worship is a part of everyday life even in the culture that is considered "barbarian" through the existence history of God. The reaction, movement, existence, comparison, purpose, and common belief in the world must demonstrate that God must exist. The existence of God is a matter without objection. Sir Isaac Newton said, "There is a reaction to all actions." Therefore, each reaction is formed by actions which themselves are reactions to previous behaviors. There is much debate about the existence of God about the existence of God. For a long time everyone wanted to prove the existence of God. Some people think that God exists and is proved by many philosophical or scientific foundations and religious reasons. On the other hand, others do not believe in the existence of God and their foundation is proved from many theoretical and scientific point of view. Many people try to prove the existence of God with reason. After Descartes proves its existence, he will think the truth about the essence of God, evidence of the existence of God, and the nature of material objects. The main task in Descartes' meditation is to design a system that allows him to understand the truth. He wants to lay the foundation of all further philosophy The medieval society believed that humans existed because God wants them to exist. Descartes does not doubt the existence of God, I doubt that the existence of man is God's desire. He has a problem because he proved the existence of God using a series of theorems. He proved that thought is the essence of thinking. At that time the revolution supports the new idea of ​​"I think myself". It gives independent thinking and free will to human institutions, leading the age of enlightenment. For Descartes, thought proves that our existence is a conscious entity. By solving the survival problem, the thinkers of the 18th and 19th centuries established mathematical and scientific identity. Equivalent thoughts and consciousness do not satisfy thinking thoughts. Beyond the era of reason, we continue to doubt our existence The idea of ​​existence of God knows that everyone has one thing, God exists. Everyone agrees with the existence of God, but philosophers like Anselm still try to prove the existence of God. In Prosolgium 's article, Anselm tried to prove the existence of God to Ganillo by giving two ways. The purpose of the dialogue is to prove that it is impossible to accept the existence of God and it is impossible to believe in the existence of God. Proof of Anselm is that God exists. so

In Alan Gewirth's "The Cartesian Circle" he rewrote the possibility of a logical mistake of Descartes's first philosophy in a previous paper. Arguments Reference to Descartes is obviously a circular reasoning, and because of the existence of God, he can have clearly distinct ideas, but the proof of the existence of God is itself clear and unique Based on ideas. Gewirth's reaction to Descartes's critic is that Descartes uses different types of certainty to prove the existence and authenticity of God rather than the accuracy of a clear and unique idea. The problem I found in his unique and clear theory is that Descartes proves the existence of God. He uses a theory of circulation when "prove" the existence of God. This circular reasoning is called Cartesian circle. The Cartesian circle is a sort of cyclic inference, on the other hand it can only be learned by clearly and independently perceiving that God exists. (Rob 200-235) This reasoning does not give concrete conclusions about the existence of God. It walked around the circle one by one. Descartes believes that only his thoughts can be deceived than his idea. So God is kind and perfect, so do not let him fool him, so God exists. In order to explain his view on the existence of God, Descartes believes that if a person can think of God as full existence, then if we can think of it in our head, He pointed out that there must be a complete existence. essay.com/Rene Explain and comment on his dreams and demons, the way of doubt, and clear and unique trials. Furthermore, his theory (opinion) is bad and good. His explanation about Rune de Carte, deductions of dreams and demons, ways of doubt, and clear and unique trials. Furthermore, his theory (opinion) is bad and good. Descartes 'era of criticism by Thomas Hobbes and Pierre Gassendi, Descartes' psychology was deprived of its introspective features in the 18th century. The original biological psychology survived the progressive circle. In British philosophy, David Hartley (1705-1757) stands out in the movement to adapt the dynamics principle of Newton and Descartes to the need for new psychological science. His observation of humanity (1749) provides a controversial and explanatory behavioristic psychological defense based on the (Hume) unified principle within the framework of introspective advocacy Descartes. In France, L'Homme-machine (1748) of Julien de La Mettrie proposed a materialistic psychology without anti-spiritual, reductive, behavioristic compromise.

The smartest friend of your book has changed his face. Our most popular lighting guide currently has twice the help, including guiding style, expanded quotes, and updated quick quizzes. Please tell me your idea. Each of us has guiding principles and philosophy to shape our prospects for life. These principles and philosophy will help us to answer questions about our happiness and our excitement. If your principles and ideas are not clear or missing, step them to fill them and to help them shape them. During the creative process, you will have a bad relationship and a new perspective will be born. The philosophical principle (Latin: Principia Philosophia) is a book by René Descartes. Essentially, it is the integration of the first philosophical approach and meditative discourse. Written in Latin, it was published in 1644. It is devoted to Bohemian Elizabeth and has longstanding friendship with Descartes. The French version (Les Principes de la Philosophie) was published in 1647. It explains the principle of nature - the law of physics - as Descartes sees. Most notably, it proposes the principle that the motion of an object is uniform and straight when there is no external force. Newton borrowed this principle from Descartes into his own Principia; to this day it is still known as the Newton's first movement law. This book is primarily intended to replace the course of Aristotle used in the then university of France and the UK. ... Descartes' philosophical principle (1644; philosophical principle). This shows a deep understanding of the Cartesian system. Spinoza generally accepted Descartes 'physics but he rejected Descartes' metaphysics and opposed the three features: the transcendence of God, the spiritual concept of "spiritual substance" is quite different from substance (Mind - body dualism ). Descartes' meditation is the pursuit of 'first principle' of philosophy. In order for the meditator to understand the principles of philosophy, meditators must decide that they believe they are true and they will never be wrong in their own mind . Therefore, Descartes is using "a suspicious method" as "a sensation-oriented picture trying to abandon criticism of the world critical to the meditator". By using the four phases, Descartes' method can not question any more, please quit your senses to make sure that later it was realy .

There is a lot of evidence in the evidence of the existence of God to try to prove the existence of God. In this article we will discuss ontological discussions, cosmological arguments, empirical discussions, such as avoiding errors and design arguments. There is much criticism about each of these, and the existence of God can not prove that it might be stronger than those who speak more strongly. The defining God definition is the god of Christians with perfection and the quality of creation of the universe. The purpose of this paper is to investigate Descartes' discussion about the existence of God. First, I will consider the evidence of the existence of the Descartes God. Then I will discuss some of the influences of God's existence. Finally, I will point out some of the complexities and problems in the evidence. Evidence of the existence of Descartes' God occurred in the third meditation. He proved his entire claim in the previous meditation, and he must exist for him to think. From this observation, Descartes realized that the concept of his existence is very clear and clear in his mind; based on this clarity and the fact that he just decided his existence, he Derived the rules Unique things are genuine. Descartes begins his proof by dividing "thinking" into four categories - thought (concept), will (choice), emotion (desire)! ... Descartes proved the existence of God as soon as possible. However, Descartes does not know that this evidence does not contain errors unless he believes his clear and independent understanding of the step of reasoning is justifiable. Therefore, the clarity and standard of independent recognition, ... Prove the existence of God. The final evidence presented in the fifth meditation starts with the proposition of Descartes as a natural concept of perfect existence. Otherwise, he is not perfect, so we conclude that God must exist. This ontological argument about science is because they believe that God is omnipotent and that his will is completely free. Lie - logical contradiction - even the truth. In contrast, human wisdom is limited.

Whether Plato believes that only philosophers are suitable for domination. For Plato, politics is an intellectual teacher, not what we take for granted. The governance of non-philosophers should be governed by opinions, beliefs, and self-interests; by contrast, philosopher rulers will dominate in virtue and justice, with no hidden agenda. Philosophers fall into love, love learning, knowledge and truth. Since knowledge is not always true, it is important to distinguish between mastery of knowledge and mastery of truth. This article is about to show Aristotle's soul / mind concept *. Then I compare it with the concept of Descartes' mind. In order to understand the concept of Aristotle 's mind, Aristotle considers Aristotle' s De Anima, which focuses on the discussion of soul / thought. I will study the work of Khan and Sorabe who have considered the philosophy of Aristotle and Descartes' soul and body problems. In order to compare the concept of Aristotle 's mind with Descartes, I introduce Descartes' most famous philosophical study. According to Kahn and Sorabjee, I showed the concept of Aristotle's mind. Then I showed the concept of Descartes' soul / thought. For Aristotle, he explained that soul / thinking is the first reality. What matters to him is not the difference between soul / ideology and body, which is the first thing. Reality: This is the first reality that Aristotle's soul is the only substance. In addition, substances and bodies are second reality. The focus of Aristotle is to make the relationship between soul / ideology and body the same. We compare the concept of Aristotle's mind and soul with the concept of Descartes. For Descartes, the mind / soul is used for special expression, consciousness. For Descartes, the mind is "thinking" that can exist without physical or physical body. I revealed that the importance of the concept of Descartes' mind is intangible. Descartes believes that the soul / mind is "thinking", and more fundamentally, he believes that the mind can exist without body. This is very different from the concept of Aristotle's mind. Aristotle believes that the mind and body "interact", so we will act together in the same place. This is a clear difference between the two philosophers. On the other hand, Descartes says that the mind and body are quite different from each other, but I think he will not deny that the body and mind interact within the "pine gland". *

A very perfect being is omnipotent, transcendental, omniscient, omnipotent and omnipotent. However, these attributes converge for various reasons such as omniscience and totipotency. The meaning of Incoherency is that it is difficult to understand that a bachelor 's degree is married, for example, if a thought or expression lacks a logical organization that makes it difficult to understand. In order to say that perfectly complete existence is omnipotent (universal), they can do anything, including logically impossible things. result "God is a very perfect being, there must be a presence in this perfection, the concept of God as perfect means that God must exist in reality, but if God If it is perfect, he must already exist. "The similarity between Anselm and Descartes' proof is shocking. Both thinkers believe that "there is nothing more than this". Both of these conclude that this great existence is perfect and that God must exist in reality. Both Descartes and Anthem use people who are not followers to show contradiction among people who understand the concept of God but who can not associate God with existence. Descartes removes the full meaning and characteristics of God to prove his existence, but Descartes still maintains the established status of the full existence of Anselm. Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz saw problems on Descartes' ontological argument: Descartes did not claim consistency of the existence of "super perfection". He insists that ontological debate will fail unless it can prove consistency of extremely perfect existence. Since Leibniz thinks it can not analyze integrity it is impossible to prove that all perfection is incompatible. He speculates that all perfection can coexist in one entity and Descartes arguments are still valid In the 17th century, René de Carte defended a series of similar arguments. For example, in the fifth meditation, Descartes claims to provide evidence that God exists within the concept of extremely perfect existence. Descartes believes that there is contradiction in imagining a very perfect existence that does not exist, compared to the idea of ​​a triangle whose interior angle is not equal to 180 degrees. Therefore, he believes that we have a very perfect idea of ​​existence - we imagined a really perfect being - we believe we must conclude that there is a perfect existence

In my opinion, the result of our action should remind our efforts to assess what is ethical behavior and what is not ethical behavior. It can be said that it is a reminder, as individuals can learn from their behavior. The outcome of their behavior is moral or moral. Therefore, whenever individuals review their actions, they will remember whether these actions have had good results for them. Therefore, they create a habit of helping them to choose whether their actions are ethical or not. This article is about to show Aristotle's soul / mind concept *. Then I compare it with the concept of Descartes' mind. In order to understand the concept of Aristotle 's mind, Aristotle considers Aristotle' s De Anima, which focuses on the discussion of soul / thought. I will study the work of Khan and Sorabe who have considered the philosophy of Aristotle and Descartes' soul and body problems. In order to compare the concept of Aristotle 's mind with Descartes, I introduce Descartes' most famous philosophical study. According to Kahn and Sorabjee, I showed the concept of Aristotle's mind. Then I showed the concept of Descartes' soul / thought. For Aristotle, he explained that the soul / thought is the first reality. What matters to him is not the difference between soul / ideology and body, which is the first thing. Reality: This is the first reality that Aristotle's soul is the only substance. In addition, substances and bodies are second reality. The focus of Aristotle is to make the relationship between soul / ideology and body the same. We compare the concept of Aristotle's mind and soul with the concept of Descartes. For Descartes, the mind / soul is used for special expression, consciousness. For Descartes, the mind is "thinking" that can exist without physical or physical body. I revealed that the importance of the concept of Descartes' mind is intangible, it can exist alone. Descartes believes that the soul / spirit is "thinking", and he believes that the mind can exist without body. This is very different from the concept of Aristotle's mind. Aristotle believes that the mind and body "interact", so we will act together in the same place. This is a clear difference between the two philosophers. On the other hand, Descartes says that the mind and body are quite different from each other, but I think he will not deny that the body and mind interact within the "pine gland". *

With this in mind, the meditators acknowledge that their senses may be deceived. His sensual knowledge is in most cases the truth, but he points out that he often believes that what he perceives is real when he dreams. Reflecting this, he commented, "I am very clearly seeing that there is no clear sign for distinguishing between awakening and sleeping" (Descartes, 19). What he feels and the image he sees in his dream comes from the experience of real life. The narrator associates this with the art; the composite image consists of many realities. Pondering the first philosophy validates Descartes' debate about the existence of God. The purpose of this paper is to explore Descartes' inference and proof of the existence of God. In the third meditation, Descartes presented two arguments to prove the existence of God, a trademark argument and a traditional cosmological argument. His claims are powerful and relatively realistic, but they do not prove the existence of God. At the beginning of meditation, Descartes began to refuse My intention in this article is to demonstrate that the discussion on the existence of God and the fear of deception in Descartes 'First Philosophy' controversy is rather weak and does not prove his conclusion. To support these arguments, we first outline the two concrete meditations and explain the proposed discussion. Later, I criticize his argument and reveal unjust conclusions. Suspicion of text includes features of God's proposal, perfect conditions, and the nature of fraud. The overview includes a discussion on whether Descartes (also called Reinatus) succeeded in his project. Thinking to be the basic text of modern philosophy, meditation of the first philosophy brings up a number of powerful arguments that have influenced the discussion of epistemology, spiritual philosophy and religious philosophy to this day. This new translation includes a revised version of the Latin version of the 2nd edition (1642) and the late French translation (1647) making Descartes' inference as clear and appealing as possible. This version also includes a brief introduction to Andrew Bailey's famous collection, Descartes and Meditation revised and extended from the original philosophy. This introduction will help the reader to understand the background and purpose of the Descartes project.

Descartes' fourth meditation shows that God can never be a liar because God is infinitely good. In order to judge something that requires understanding and will, you should know that understanding is infinite, in other words, it is ability. It can not be understood or recognized clearly, but an error occurs. Therefore, based on this fact, we can understand that mistakes are ours and we are not wrong with God. Since mind is mere infinite entity, he can not blame us for giving us unrestrained will. The first meditation of the first meditation meditation reflects the number of lies the meditator thought of in his life and the ability of the body to deceive him, so it is "what can be suspected". Sitting alone in the fire, he decided to disassemble his previous opinion and rebuild his knowledge on a more clear foundation. But when the meditator dreamed that he perceived the real thing, he realized that he was often convinced. He was awake and convinced that he was sitting beside the fire, but he often dreamed about this sort of thing, reflecting what he was fully convinced of. After further consideration, he realized that even simple things would be questioned. God who can do anything can even fake our mathematical concept. Some people may say that God is very kind and does not make Descartes incorrectly believe all these things. Thinking to be the basic text of modern philosophy, meditation of the first philosophy brings up a number of powerful arguments that have influenced the discussion of epistemology, spiritual philosophy and religious philosophy to this day. This new translation includes a revised version of the Latin version of the 2nd edition (1642) and the late French translation (1647) making Descartes' inference as clear and appealing as possible. This version also includes a brief introduction to Andrew Bailey's famous collection, Descartes and Meditation revised and extended from the original philosophy. This introduction will help the reader to understand the background and purpose of the Descartes project. By contemplating the first philosophy, Descartes metaphysics was established. It recognizes his physics, as you can see from the analogy of his tree. In philosophical principles Descartes calculates the fundamentals of physics, and the first part is actually meditation meditation (slightly different). "Principles" are texts which greatly influence the development of modern physics. For example, Isaac Newton (1643-1727) will develop his physics as a reaction to Descartes and use the latter as his own foil. Actually, Newton's Principia (principle) may be called a tribute to Descartes' book. Therefore Descartes' physics (and his metaphysics) are thought to be incorrect, but it plays an important role in the development of modern physics.

Running Head: DESCARTES VS SPINOZA 1 Issue II: Relationship between Descartes and Spinoza's mind and body Nicole Yang 20502251 PHIL 384 July 23, 2014 DESCARTES VS SPINOZA 2 Introduction How do the two entities of different dimensions interact? Human thinking and unification of the body are persistent philosophical problems that have been sought since ancient Greece, and it is one of the main problems studied by Descartes and Spinoza. Descartes started this discourse at a rationalism school and Spinoza later answered his job. In this article, I compare contrast between Descartes and Spinoza 's views on human thought and physical relationship and keep Spinoza' s claim. Similarity Descartes and Spinoza have relatively little similarity between beliefs about physical and spiritual connections. The first point determines the epistemological independence of the mind and body. For Spinoza, the human body has extended attributes, human thought has attributes of thought and expression. Also, the mind and body may express the possibilities of reality in parallel, or the mind and body may be the same substance (substance) considered under different attributes. In the language Spinoza inherited from Descartes, the idea is an expression of ideas. This led to Spinoza's famous conclusion that the human heart is equivalent to the human mind. The parallelism of Spinoza also means that every change in the human body must accompany a change in human thought. "Everything that happens to the subject of thinking that constitutes human thought must be perceived by human thought, that is, if the object constitutes the human mind, the concept is the body, Nothing happens to the body that is not perceived in its mind (Part 2, Proposition 12).

Running Head: DESCARTES VS SPINOZA 1 Issue II: Relationship between Descartes and Spinoza's mind and body Nicole Yang 20502251 PHIL 384 July 23, 2014 DESCARTES VS SPINOZA 2 Introduction How do the two entities of different dimensions interact? Human thinking and unification of the body are persistent philosophical problems that have been sought since ancient Greece, and it is one of the main problems studied by Descartes and Spinoza. Descartes started this discourse at a rationalism school and Spinoza later answered his job. In this article, I compare contrast between Descartes and Spinoza 's views on human thought and physical relationship and keep Spinoza' s claim. Similarity Descartes and Spinoza have relatively little similarity between beliefs about physical and spiritual connections. The first point determines the epistemological independence of the mind and body. For Spinoza, the human body has extended attributes, human thought has attributes of thought and expression. Also, the mind and body may express the possibilities of reality in parallel, or the mind and body may be the same substance (substance) considered under different attributes. In the language Spinoza inherited from Descartes, the idea is an expression of ideas. This led to Spinoza's famous conclusion that the human heart is equivalent to the human mind. The parallelism of Spinoza also means that every change in the human body must accompany a change in human thought. "Everything that happens to the subject of thinking that constitutes human thought must be perceived by human thought, that is, if the object constitutes the human mind, the concept is the body, Nothing happens to the body that is not perceived in its mind (Part 2, Proposition 12).

In order to distinguish between idealism and realism, you first have to understand these two terms thoroughly. Idealism means to imagine or see things in an ideal or perfect way. On the other hand, realism tends to make a more practical and practical view of the situation. In amateur language, these two concepts can be viewed as different views; idealism focuses on "may be" and realism focuses on "real things". The definition of these commonly accepted words is based on the philosophical usage of the term. In philosophy, when discussing perceptual problems, idealism is a theory that shows that our reality is shaped by our ideas and ideas. On the other hand, the fact that realism deals with the fact that reality has an absolute existence that is independent of our thoughts, ideas, and even consciousness. Idealists often find positive thinkers - people who look half full of glass -. Many realists do not have opposing or negative views, but they see the situation through less hopeless eyes. Realists are stereotypes as extremely reasonable people who think carefully and make an emphasis on their choice before making a choice. In this sense, the realist makes a safer and practical choice than the idealist, and the idealists may be willing to make more dangerous decisions. These ideas also influence how individuals respond to the success or failure of life. Idealists who are constantly looking for "good" are not affected by recession more than realists. However, it may not always be good to achieve goals that you can not achieve by getting lost in the fantasy world. Idealists may set impossible or ambitious targets. On the other hand, realists tend to set achievable targets and pursue their pursuit in a planned way. In general, idealism and realism can be understood as two different perspectives. The main differences are as follows. Idealism allows you to look at things in a very promising way and shape your situation with your own thoughts. On the other hand, realism makes it possible for people to assess the situation without serious emotional involvement. 2. Idealists tend to be more active in understanding things and performing work than realists. They may be ambitious, but lack the clarity and focus to achieve these goals. Send an email: If you like this article or our website. Please spread. Share with friends and family The main difference between idealism and indirect realism is not metaphysical perception, but a big metaphysical view of what exists outside the heart. Berkeley and Descartes agreed on the subject of direct perception, but Descartes also proposed another external object that has nothing to do with the mind. Idealists deny that there is a layer of perceived veil because Descartes is not wrong about the nature of perception, but the nature of cats and rocks is wrong. In order to distinguish between idealism and realism, you first have to understand these two terms thoroughly. Idealism means to imagine or see things in an ideal or perfect way. On the other hand, realism tends to make a more practical and practical view of the situation. In amateur language, these two concepts can be viewed as different views; idealism focuses on "may be" and realism focuses on "real things". The definition of these commonly accepted words is based on the philosophical usage of the term. In philosophy, when discussing perceptual problems, idealism is a theory that shows that our reality is shaped by our ideas and ideas. On the other hand, the fact that realism deals with the fact that reality has an absolute existence that is independent of our thoughts, ideas, and even consciousness. Discussion between idealism and realism is a complex, often controversial, philosophical and ethical field. On the other hand, idealism is related to transcendental reality, which emphasizes the motivation for achieving a high level of mental concept and integrity. On the other hand, realists question the validity and

Only the soul can understand Descartes' overall goal in "First philosophical meditation". It is to question the knowledge. In order to explore issues such as the existence of God and the separation of the mind and body, we must distinguish between the truths we know. He believes rationality as opposed to experience is the source of discovering what absolute certainty is. In meditation 2, Descartes set out on his truth journey. In meditation II, I discovered that Descartes completed a part of his journey as only intelligence can perceive the world of matter. In his efforts to prove that the material thing only exists in the head of the perceptor, Berkeley insists that in order to have ideas about it he must really perceive things. The idea exists only when it is perceived. A physical object is a collection of ideas. Therefore, physical objects only exist when they are perceived. For example, consider a person who is considering trees in your favorite meadow. His idea for the tree is based solely on the ideas and images in front of the tree, if he is not actually seeing the tree or perceives it directly. Memory of old ideas does not constitute the existence of things Berkeley asserts that an object exists only in the minds of people who perceive it. His main point is that the object does not exist as perceived, but he does not think he is the only perceiver. He believes it exists as long as some ideas are treated as objects. So even though I decided to look at the tree and close my eyes, I can not see the tree anymore, but it will continue to exist as long as other people perceive it. Fictional ones exist in their minds and they only exist when people keep thinking about it. However, if there is something in the hearts of many people, it can continue to exist regardless of whether I perceive it or not. However, once someone does not recognize the concept of the object, that object no longer exists. Does Essay.com / Berkeley think that if things are not perceived by anyone, that thing will disappear? Otherwise, what does he believe? When no one perceives anything, does Berkeley believe that things do not exist? Otherwise, what does he believe? Because things are ideas, humans have the idea to use them to think about them, so the nature of thought and thought is worth considering carefully. Berkeley thinks that thought is passive and can be perceived only in the mind. He continued, said these ideas exist only when the mind perceives them. This is logical as something is not being reconsidered, as it does not exist in the field of knowledge at that particular moment. For example, if you move to another country after a while and forget the American old house, it will no longer exist. According to a non-materialistic point of view, my earlier thinking will choose not to reflect the past. Therefore, only active mind can produce purely passive ideas. Idealism is a metaphysical position. In other words, there is only one substance (monism) and the problem is mental. Or, the only thing that you believe to exist is those thoughts and thoughts. From this point of view, what we call physical objects is actually just a (complex) idea. Physics is a metaphysical position, there is only one substance (monism), the problem is important. Or the only thing that it thinks is a physical object and a physical force. From this point of view, regardless of whether the thought is a physical thing (object, force, or physical object and force manipulation), they simply do not exist.

Small consensus on knowledge theory Descartes' meditation primarily involves knowledge issues; that is, if any, you can support anything. In this article we will present quite different questions. This makes the following questions clearer. To understand, why use knowledge and theory? In this regard, Descartes presents several arguments, including simple human interests, concerns about free will, understanding of human motives, and moral value issues. Both theories are trying to explain human behavior - conflict and consensual theory. Consensus theory argues that social norms can be achieved by sharing norms, beliefs, values, but conflict theory argues that inequality creates class conflicts. Then perceive the world by opposing the opinions that influence how these theories achieve their ultimate goal. The patterns of consensus and conflict differ in many ways, including their social outlook and its value, assumptions about the ultimate goal and means. Small consensus on knowledge theory Descartes' meditation primarily involves knowledge issues; that is, if any, you can support anything. In this article we will present quite different questions. This makes the following questions clearer. To understand, why use knowledge and theory? - The consensus theory on the content of criminal law, the way society finds itself, is the product of social needs and values, which is also for the benefit of society. The rule is that the community controls itself for ordering. When a crime is committed, it will be punished when society deems it appropriate. The importance of this crime must be evaluated by the same society and punishment itself. The theory of consensus and conflict differs in their perception, values, means, and goals for society. Consensus theory argues that the world is a society with common norms and beliefs, while conflict theory sees social division due to inequality. Therefore, they have different precedence values ​​and targets. The consensus theory only hopes for harmony and the opposition theory hopes to achieve social change by eliminating inequality. Violent means can also occur in conflict and consensual theory, which is why they are likely to cause war. Even in the process of pursuing consensus, violence may be inevitable, which is why aggression is common in modern society. Consequently, the theory of conflict and consensus shows how the difference in worldview influences the philosophy of a good society and how to achieve it.

John Locke, Berkeley, Hume are both experienced philosophers. They all have different opinions, but I agree with three things; the only source of real knowledge is unreliable inappropriate knowledge paths unless it is based on a solid foundation of sensory experience A certain sensory experience Evidence indicates that natural thinking in the mind is learned from experience. Each of these philosophers formed some of the most fascinating concepts of our relationship with the surrounding world. Empiricism, a belief in the realization of knowledge through sensation, is the universal belief of several great contemporary philosophers. Perhaps the most famous empiricists are John Locke, George Berkeley and David Hume who are considered to be one of the most influential philosophers in the past 500 years. Due to the importance of experience in philosophical principles, each philosopher can be regarded as an experientist. More specifically, the empirical perspective of rock can be seen from his view on the primary and secondary nature of objects. David Hume Hume, David, 1711-76, Scottish philosopher, and historian. Hume brings empiricalism of John Rock and George Berkeley to the logical extremes of fundamental skepticism. He denied the possibility of certain kinds of knowledge and found a series of emotions in his mind and believed that the causal relationship in nature was entirely from B's introduction. The answer to the theme is drawn by the time committee named as illusion by David Hume, and the time committee named human by himself. In the era of modern philosophy, when the influence of Descartes was still important, David Hume brought the argument of killing the Descartes I created and skipping it like a ghost in human perception. You can see not only the theme but also the contrast between Hume and Descartes. Among the important philosophers related to empiricism are Aristotle, Thomas Aquinas, Francis Bacon, Thomas Hobbes, John Rock, George Berkeley, David Hume, and John Stuart Mill. Recently, positivists such as Mach, Vienna Circle, logical positivists, and most followers of analysis philosophy are empiricists. The central concept of scientific and scientific methods is that all evidence must be based on observable evidence by sensory or sensory extension empirically or empirically. It is distinguished from philosophical usage of empirical philosophy by using adjective "experience" or adverb "experience". Experience refers to the use of working assumptions used in combination with natural science and social science and can be tested or experimentally tested. In this sense, the scientific statement is the subject of our experience and observation and is derived from them.

Mind and body are said to be two different entities with different characteristics. Many people believe that each has its own attributes and can not have other attributes. In my opinion, mind and body can be distinguished between these attributes, but they can be distinguished from other ones. Mind and body are interdependent and require other people to make a decision. The mind needs physical learning, experiences can make accurate judgments, and the body needs a mind to make decisions. "The mind and the body are opposite to each other in many respects and both the body and the mind must act according to their own principles.But thought and body differ in character but they are complementary As a function of the whole person, we need to discover the actual nature of spiritual characteristics. "The principles of physical and mental adjustment express the natural function in human life It is seen as a universal law to do. . Therefore, they can be applied directly to myriad everyday activities and tasks. When learning Japanese yoga it is not unusual to encounter courses and seminars that apply these general principles directly to clerical, sales, management, sports, art, music, talking in public etc. Psychological history of many psychology in the mind and body includes attempts to solve physical and mental problems and how they interact. Thanks to the influential work of René Descartes written around 1630, the philosophical distinction between the body and the mind can be traced back to the Greeks, but first the systematic explanation of the relationship between the body and the mind You should. When he is a friend of Descartes and frequently journalist Marin Mersenne wrote him Galileo ... Language is one of the most powerful media in the human world, not only through languages ​​but also through visuals and media. Music to express words. Language is the silence between spoken words and phrases and the next phrase. In our culture we are trying to mark objects as monochrome. It is either or this, but when something is missing from the language, we try to assign a color to it rather than making them real. I have two people.

David Hume Hume, David, 1711-76, Scottish philosopher, and historian. Hume brings empiricalism of John Rock and George Berkeley to the logical extremes of fundamental skepticism. He denied the possibility of some kind of knowledge, found a series of emotions in his mind, and believed that the causal relationship in nature arises from the combination of the two kinds of impressions. David Hume was born in Edinburgh, Scotland. He first studied law at the University of Edinburgh. Hume served as secretary, librarian and embassy staff. David Hume went to France twice. He met Jean Jacques Rousseau, Diderot, d'Hollbach, Turgot, d'Alembert. When Rousseau came to England to find a job. Hume helped Rousseau find a job, and Rousseau could not stick to it for his prosecution. In addition, Hume does not allow us to apply the concept of "knowledge" to natural science. Hume distinguishes between what we call now analytical knowledge and the concept of de facto problems we currently call synthetic knowledge. Analysis, or prior knowledge and integration, posterior knowledge has the truth of two different standards David Hume Hume, David, 1711-76, Scottish philosopher, and historian. Hume brings empiricalism of John Rock and George Berkeley to the logical extremes of fundamental skepticism. He denied the possibility of certain kinds of knowledge and found a series of emotions in his mind and believed that the causal relationship in nature was entirely from B's introduction. The answer to the theme is drawn by the time committee named as illusion by David Hume, and the time committee named human by himself. In the era of modern philosophy, when the influence of Descartes was still important, David Hume brought the argument of killing the Descartes I created and skipping it like a ghost in human perception. You can see not only the theme but also the contrast between Hume and Descartes. An attractive similarity between William Okamem and David Hume, such as the general view of causality. Answer: Occam Hume's David Hume William did not deny a causal relationship. He accepted it. However, he says that empirical methods can not logically prove their necessity. For Hume, causality is what human beings naturally believe.

Naturally, before the general vision of television, the Internet, DVD, and American football, basketball, hockey, NASCAR, Extreme Sports, and American culture, baseball is one of the few activities almost all Americans know It is one of. The past and the present are people to discuss and share with their neighbors, colleagues, and their families. According to the early history of baseball, "Americans started baseball in an informal game in the early 19th century. In conversation, people use the word "nature" in a variety of contexts: nature is the meaning (theology) inherited from God, nature is the meaning of human existence in ancient society (anthropology); nature and Human meaning Nature and human nature (psychological) are consistent and essentially exist in nature (general). However, in these contexts, the natural intention is the opposite of "specific culture specific" - meaning "natural" means universal or culturally independent. Descartes said that for many of his ideas nature taught him that something in the outside world resembles them. He distinguishes nature in this context from the expression "natural light" or "natural light". I will explain two different meanings of the word "nature". What does Descartes' natural light or natural light mean? What is its purpose and function? Descartes mentioned several things he thought he knew through natural light or natural light. Is somewhat doubtful about relief of natural light? Why? Traditionally, natural theology is a term used to observe nature and to prove the existence of God and the sacred purpose with human reason. From a more positive perspective, natural theology is part of theology, not relying on revelation. To some extent "to reveal God" is based on the premise that the purpose of God and God is not open to human understanding, it is completely related to natural theology, the probability of the theology and rationality revealed It is to solve the problem. From the 17th century to the 18th century, attempts were made to establish a "natural religion" that people might agree with, thereby improving the harsh accusations and actions of skeptics who revealed religion. A classic piece for reasonable derivation of sacred purpose is William Paley's natural theology (1802), but as dates back to Plato's work, rationality about the existence of God's rationality in the work world You can find a good discussion. - 347)

Francis Bacon was born in London on January 22, 1561. He is the son of Sir Nicholas Bacon, the guardian of the great seal of Elizabeth I. Bacon studied at Cambridge University and Gray Hotel, and became a Diet member in 1584. However, he did not like Elizabeth, and when James I joined Bacon in 1603 he began to prosper. In that year, he was appointed as a series of positions and eventually decided to have a huge seal guardian like his father. However, bacon 's real concern is in science. Much of the science of this age was based on the study of the ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle. Many of Aristotle's ideas such as Earth's position in the center of the universe have been overturned but his way is still in use. This makes it possible to reach scientific truth through prestigious discussion: If a wise person discusses topics for a long time, the truth will eventually be discovered. Bacon challenged this and believed that the truth would require evidence from the real world. He originally released his view on "Novum Organum" (1620). This is an explanation of the correct way to acquire natural knowledge. The political rise of bacon is also continuing. In 1618 he was appointed England's most powerful lord and became a Viscount of St Albans in 1621. Soon after, he acknowledged that he was accused by the parliament of accepting bribes. He was fined and imprisoned, then exiled from the courtroom. The king later forgave him, which was the end of Bacon's public life. He retired from the home of Gorhambury in Hertfordshire and continued writing. He died in London on April 9, 1626 Francis Bacon (1561 - 1626) is a British scientist and lawyer. Bacon is a tool of Renaissance and scientific enlightenment. In particular, Bacon has developed and promoted scientific approaches based on well-organized scientific approaches that demonstrate evidence, results, and new scientific rigor. He is widely regarded as the father of empiricism and the scientific revolution of the Renaissance. Bacon was born on January 22, 1561, near the strand of London in the UK. At the age of 12 he entered Cambridge's Trinity College where he traced the traditional medieval course, mostly in Latin. He praised Aristotle, but he criticized Aristotle's philosophical approach (he called "useless") and academic tradition. Richmond and Plato Francis Bacon (1561-1626) was one of the key figures in the field of natural philosophy and scientific methodology from the Renaissance to the early modern era. As lawyers, parliamentarians and queen lawyers, Bacon asked questions about law, nation and religion, and modern politics, but he also published sentences speculated about possible social concepts, even in his book on nature Thinking about the moral problem (Prose) in the work of progress. Francis Bacon (1561 - 1626) British philosopher, politician, speaker and scientist. Bacon is considered to be "father of empiricism" for his work in the study of scientific phenomena and his work in advancing scientific methodology and structured scientific exploration. He encourages his own example and philosophical experience. An important figure in the scientific revolution of the 17th century. Rene de Carte (1596 - 1650) Rene de Carte is a French philosopher and mathematician. Descartes made a great contribution to the philosophy of rationalism. Descartes' meditation is epoch-making. Because he suspects previous beliefs and is trying to prove their validity through logic. Later empiricists opposed Descartes' method, but his philosophy opened up many topics for further discussion. Descartes has been proved to be "the existence of God", but his doubt is an important step in promoting reasons over faith.

My life, my fantasy, my philosophy - Descartes' fourth meditation, Plato's cave fables, Francis Bacon's four idols, and Walt Disney are the discovery processes every day, I myself It is a hypocrite, living in the world of hypocrites on this planet, not a soul that can live happily. We have developed a defense mechanism to fight all things unknown in the world. To my knowledge, he had never played Dream Baseball: "Opportunity is good for preparing ideas" I have found this philosophy very much. I helped to win my fantasy alliance, and my life goes beyond statistics and packing scores. Nothing can be guaranteed in life, but I am planning for Gotham Bat to win again this year. My life, my fantasy, my philosophy - Descartes' fourth meditation, Plato's cave fables, Francis Bacon's four idols, and Walt Disney are the discovery processes every day, I myself It is a hypocrite, living in the world of hypocrites on this planet, not a soul that can live happily. - Philosophical papers in the lifetime of Percy Shelly: a clear contradiction between personal philosophy and popular culture, and the actual accomplishments Shelley has achieved in his short life have no end. Sherry is a perception of this discrepancy, as we saw in the preface of the Islamic Uprising he continued to influence his career. His daily life Many people do not even consciously use this philosophy; others will question almost all decisions they do. My personal moral philosophy is closely related to my leadership philosophy. I live in the first category. They are people who work with moral philosophy. These philosophies are not clearly pointed out, but they are closely related to my beliefs. This article will allow me to express my personal and leadership philosophy. My personal philosophy has been shaped and developed. The concept of care comes from personal and professional organizations and has a major impact on individual perceptions of careers and care. Every nurse should have a philosophy or a series of beliefs based on care behavior. It is worth noting that the philosophy of care is inherently dynamic and may change over time. Having a documented philosophy is considered not only as an academic activity but also as a requirement for job certification.

The issue of the existence of God has been discussed throughout human history and all philosophers from Socrates to Emmanuel Kant are discussing the argument. Since this topic grew so big, I invented and used a lot of evidence to prove or refute the existence of God. However, I do not have an answer yet, so I would like to know if there is an answer. Therefore, I will try to ascertain whether it is possible to prove the existence of God philosophically in this article. Before you start writing your paper, you have to decide several points. There is much debate about the existence of God about the existence of God. For a long time everyone wanted to prove the existence of God. Some people think that God exists and is proved by many philosophical or scientific foundations and religious reasons. On the other hand, others do not believe in the existence of God, and their foundation is proved from many theoretical and scientific point of view. Many people try to prove the existence of God with reason. After Descartes proves its existence, people will consider the truth about the essence of God, evidence of the existence of God, and the nature of material objects. The main task in Descartes' meditation is to design a system that allows him to understand the truth. He wants to lay the foundation of all further philosophy The medieval society believed that humans existed because God wants them to exist. Descartes does not doubt the existence of God, I doubt that the existence of man is God's desire. He has a problem because he proved the existence of God using a series of theorems. He proved that thought is the essence of thinking. At that time the revolution supports the new idea of ​​"I think myself". It gives independent thinking and free will to human institutions, leading the age of enlightenment. For Descartes, thought proves that our existence is a conscious entity. By solving the survival problem, the thinkers of the 18th and 19th centuries established mathematical and scientific identity. Equivalent thoughts and consciousness do not satisfy thinking thoughts. Beyond the era of reason, we continue to doubt our existence The idea of ​​existence of God knows that everyone has one thing, God exists. Everyone agrees with the existence of God, but philosophers like Anselm still try to prove the existence of God. In Prosolgium 's article, Anselm tried to prove the existence of God to Ganillo by giving two ways. The purpose of the dialogue is to prove that it is impossible to accept the existence of God and it is impossible to believe in the existence of God. Proof of Anselm is that God exists. so

The complex system of its dominant ideology biased toward promotion of slavery and hatred, fear and overwhelming power, former US slavery is a human destroyer, non-user friendly machine crossed everyone It affected me. Today, most Americans of society 's sorrow, in the United States, slaughtered slavery in the past. How our predecessors, the US enacted laws to keep slavery in practice, putting slaves as legal acts, what America is that it is today. So what is the basis for this prejudice? There are many sources of information including black non-human of slave there, so we can keep it but recently it is also possible that former president Richard Nixon began drug warfare began in 1971 the bias It is an important source of. This is considered an intentional attack against the black community. UK, too. According to the London School of Economics, in a recent report / 2009-10 2009, drugs will generally search the entire population of 10 searching 1,000 people. For those who have been identified as mixed, for seven thousand, those who came from the white community, it has increased per 14000 people for those who have been identified as Asians per 18 thousand Increasing to people of Before being displayed in the discussion on French colonial slavery, "bias" has become a prominent topic of European whole discussion. Prejudice is just holding in the absence of people recognizing the situation of modern misunderstanding idea, before the development of some generations. Until the 17th century, the prejudice of the class specifies the provisional decision that the court has reached based on moderate evidence. Changes The meaning of "prejudice" begins the philosopher René Descartes (René Descartes, 1596 to 1650), and he rationally removes "previewers" and "custom habitual points" occurring later only I insisted on thinking.

Expressionism and opposition to realism - Kant, Davidson and Roti (1) Abstract: The concept of expressionism and anti-expression is introduced in the discussion of contemporary philosophy of Richard Drotti to explain him and the new pragmatism I was wrong. Attitudes towards traditional epistemological problems Roti means that the history of philosophy indicates that there is no final answer to traditional knowledge, truth, and representation; therefore, they are rejected It should be. Richard Rorty argued that contemporary analytical philosophy in a philosophical and natural mirror inadvertently imitates scientific methods. In addition, he condemns traditional epistemological viewpoint of expressionism and its corresponding theory, which depends on knowledge and independence of observer phenomena and passivity of natural phenomena and consciousness. As a supporter of anti-fundamentalism and anti-essentialism in the framework of pragmatism, he responded to postmodernism of traditionalism and relativism, but he responded to most postmodern ideas and his social liberalism I opposed the commitment. This 144 page book has a title that may lead people to introductory, but while summarizing McIntyre 's theme, the author also considers other philosophers such as Donald Davidson, especially Richard Roti Use. In order to understand McIntyre's idea, readers unfamiliar with Davidson and Rorty may find it difficult to understand this material. These essays are very broad, including a paper on the concept of justice in MacIntyre, an explanation of his liberalism, his interpretation of Aquinas, and criticism of his Enlightenment. The last chapter is written by MacIntyre himself; entitled "Partial Response to My Critics", it provides McIntyre's response to some of the criticism raised by other authors. (Motivation to interact with McKintal's critics is rare and worthy of praise) From Peirce and James to Rorty and Davidson, pragmatists have sought empiricism to purify Descartes' remains. For example, they claim that empiricism deprives the spiritual understanding Rock, Berkeley, and Hume inherited from Descartes. According to this Cartesianism, thinking is completely subjective and private that its content of "thinking" or "impression" is irrevocable, completely separated from the objective world being publicized when they express ing. . Accepting this world of mind, experientists have to face the long series of difficult questions - loneliness, skepticism, realism, idealism -.

Relationship between Utopian sovereignty and subjectivity, Machiavelli's discourse, and Hobbes' Levi san Thomas Moore, Niccolò Machiavelli, Thomas Hobbes are the sovereign and people in their work. Relationships between models provide model utopia, discourse, and Leviathan. I believe that ensuring common interests of people should be the main goal of sovereign owners. But their explanation for this relationship and their specific interpretation of the sovereign interpretation of people's motive for prosperity are different. Thomas Hobbes, Niccolo Machiavelli Thomas Hobbes and Niccolo Machiavelli are the two best philosophers ever. Hobbes was born in England in 1588 when absoluteism dominated Europe. His most famous work is Leviathan written in 1651. Hobbes discusses the ideal state and innate laws like people and nature. Machiavelli was born in Italy in 1469, the homeland was dominated by foreign forces. - Over time, people always want to know what we become reality. Our human nature has always made us interested in the relationship between ourselves and others. Because this curiosity creates various interpretations of our human nature, each interpretation changes the way we see the social world we live in. Each interpretation brings a new understanding of people and their relationship. Thomas Hobbs wrote Leviathan as evidence of how to operate the country. Indeed, it is very similar to his work with Machiavelli. Hobbes is a monarch whose work reflects absoluteists. His work took place during political instability as it was announced in 1651. His universe philosophy is very basic, but his view on absolute sovereignty and the Commonwealth is wonderful. - Rene Descartes and Thomas Hobbes: Dialogue When people start an incredible journey through meditation in Descartes, there are many doubts, criticisms and seemingly fundamental problems and will interfere with people. progress

Aristotle's reading is a little confusing. Please understand. He is very happy and happy. The final profit is complete and self-sufficient. He will continue talking about human behavior. For clear goals, animals are technically said to have these behaviors, but they lack rationality and intelligence. Learn Aristotle's philosophy through introductions of textbooks and commentary on Aristotle's work. Aristotle himself talked a lot about his ancient predecessor's position. The most extensive comment also details other positions other than Aristotle. In this framework and considering Cicero's reading, Descartes will come in contact with the teachings of ancient Atomist, Plato and Stoic, and he will hear skeptics. In addition, La Fleche also knows about important mental events, including the discovery of Jupiter's moon by Galileo in 1610. Therefore, Aristotle's school's philosophy dominated his grade, but he is not the only philosophy. Aristotle's philosophy is beyond the importance of Atomist in late Roman times and medieval Europe, but their work is still preserved and explained through comments on Aristotle's work. In the second century of the second AD, Gallen (AD 129 - 216) widely discussed Greek nuclear physicists, especially Epicurean, in his Aristotle's commentary. According to atomist historian Joshua Gregory, there was no serious atomism until Galsendi and Descartes resurrected in the 17th century from the era of Gallen. "The gap between these two" modern naturalists "and ancient atomists shows" atom abortion "and is widely recognized that" medieval abandoned atomism and almost lost atomism " ing. Boethius began translating Eisagogies of Porphyry before 510, which introduced the logic of Aristotle in Greek in the 3 rd century, detailed it in double commentary. Then he translated Katēgoriai, commented in his ruling year, and published two comments on Aristotle's six papers, Per On hermeneias ("On Interpretation"). Old short commentary on Aristotle's Analytika Protera ("previous analysis") may also be his; he also wrote two short stories about three speech

Pureness of Desiderius Erasmus and Cannibals and silly praise of civilization In desiderius Erasmus's "stupid praise" and Michel de Montaigne's "eating race", in some cases to the nature the actual civilization of that need Research has been confirmed. First of all, Erasmus said, "Destroying illusions is truly confusing the entire game, masks and costumes are the eyes of spectators." The desire to propose clear contracts among people - This can be called meaningful Michel de Montaigne's article "Cannibals", Michel de Montaigne said: "According to our criteria, this is truly barbarian, as they describe the Brazilians in the article" Cannibals "in the 1580 article I have to do this completely or we have to do so There is a remarkable distance between their roles and our character "(158). - Descartes' free will to think the first philosophy In my first philosophical thinking, Descartes led the reader to practice methodology in philosophical exploration. After robbing all the wisdom of doubt and false beliefs, he reexamined the nature and structure of existence and tried to universally obtain a valid epistemology without skepticism. Michel de Montaigne wrote in his article "On Cannibals" that local residents in Brazil "sometimes get sad because they lived in a very pure state, so they could not understand at an early stage." In fact, they are respectable people who are unknown to them saying "lies, rebellion, fraud, greed, jealousy, jealousy". A century and a half later, Jean Jacques Rousseau will explain his ideas about the fall of mankind from grace when this species exchanges the tribal nature for social hostility and selfish conspiracy. He believes that this early stage holds "the best of mankind." In his novel "Emile", he sought to maintain these stunning virtues despite systematic destruction I proposed an educational method.

In life on this planet, I began to question the things many people are doing as blind faith. We all know that we will "physically" die someday. Rather than doubting the existence of super almighty, it is easy to accept that human beings continue to move to a safe shelter and be forgiven by all. Fortunately, there is a tendency to question why and how some of us are in front of us. "Does God exist?" Fortunately, Richard Dawkins wrote a new book "God's Thoughts". This is exactly the answer to this question. After all, the answer is "No, God does not exist" (Please do not deny that Dawkins reached his conclusion before the card won the World Series). Power is not enough to convince some experts. Literary critic Terry Eagleton provides an example of his idea for London Book Review. Eagleton's comments are discussed in some of my favorite blogs: 3 Quarks Daily, Pharyngula, Uncertain Principles, Valve (2), There is much debate about the existence of God about the existence of God. For a long time everyone wanted to prove the existence of God. Some people think that God exists and is proved by many philosophical or scientific foundations and religious reasons. On the other hand, others do not believe in the existence of God, and their foundation is proved from many theoretical and scientific point of view. Many people try to prove the existence of God with reason. After Descartes proves its existence, people will consider the truth about the essence of God, evidence of the existence of God, and the nature of material objects. The main task in Descartes' meditation is to design a system that allows him to understand the truth. He wants to lay the foundation of all further philosophy

The controversy about God's existence can be defined as a complete, omnipotent, omniscient founder and the universe ruler. Many people do not believe any religion. For those who do not believe in religion, there is no reason to believe in God. People who do not believe in God and oppose the existence of God are proving totally wrong. God exists for various reasons. Discussion that is most widely accepted and criticized about the existence of God. My purpose in this article is to explain why cosmological arguments are proof of the existence of God, to understand that it is the importance of posteriori posteriori discussion, and to my common argument It is to observe the position of. First of all, as a living person on earth, we can safely conclude that the majority of things that exist today have their cause. I confirmed that there is a reason. Before attempting to explain and evaluate the moral argument about God's existence, it is beneficial to understand the purpose of God's existential argument. Of course, though the views on this are diverse, most contemporary supporters do not believe that theoretical arguments are "proof". They should provide effective arguments and prerequisites that reasonable people can not deny. Such success criterion obviously sets high criteria for success and supporters of the argument of the writer can hardly meet philosophical discussions of interesting conclusions in areas other than formal logic such criteria Correctly point out. Is the premise of these arguments reasonable, at least for reasonable people, more reasonable than rejection? Discussion of Rene Descartes on the existence of God Rene Descartes's debate about the existence of God is related to his rationalistic deduction reasoning. Descartes concluded that the truth about the existence of God exists in His idea about the completeness of God and the essence of God (as a complete existence that must exist to be perfect). As a rationalist philosopher, Descartes truncates human knowledge as a product of our sensory data (our senses), but an epistemological sense that our knowledge can be obtained through a process of deducing our own idea I support the position.

David Hume has expressed strong support in the fourth section of the "human understanding survey". Hume said: "As a universal proposition I will take freedom to declare that I do not accept any exceptions, knowledge of this relationship is not obtained by a priori reasoning under any circumstances When discussing 'knowledge of this relationship', Hume refers to causality. Since all such knowledge is suspicious, this sentence can easily be regarded as being skeptical. David Hume Hume, David, 1711-76, Scottish philosopher, and historian. Hume brings empiricalism of John Rock and George Berkeley to the logical extremes of fundamental skepticism. He denied the possibility of certain kinds of knowledge and found a series of emotions in his mind and believed that the causal relationship in nature was entirely from B's introduction. The answer to the theme is drawn by the time committee named as illusion by David Hume, and the time committee named human by himself. In the era of modern philosophy, when the influence of Descartes was still important, David Hume brought the argument of killing the Descartes I created and skipping it like a ghost in human perception. You can see not only the theme but also the contrast between Hume and Descartes. Suicide analysis of David Hume "I do not think anyone will abandon their lives, but it is worth continuing." In a paper by David Hume "suicide" he pursued a philosophical argument about reasonable suicide. However, the underlying argument focuses on inappropriate evidence of the government and society, which condemns and prohibits such behavior, the creation of religion, and superstition and lies of God. Hume thinks that it is the final stage of the person's experience before observing observation. David Hume's induction problem. According to Hume, this reasoning method is logically effective. Logically reasonable reasoning indicates that if the premise is true, the conclusion must be true. Better still, if you accept this premise, you must accept that conclusion. There is no way to realize this place, and the conclusion is wrong. However, this is not the case as the use of a priori reasoning does not prove logically correct inductive reasoning.

Practicalism, empiricism, and practicalism of David Hume are based on the philosophy that experience has to test and retest the idea and experience determines the reality. The practitioner also does not believe in the existence of absolute truths and values. David Hume said: "We can not draw evidence from the fact that we are very carefully watching, if we doubt, we can not be convinced" ("Theory" 2645). Hume's empiricist ideal is the root of early pragmatism and in our reality there is nothing to be confirmed and everything perceptible must always be qualified to find a place of reality . Hume's epistemology David Hume is a Scottish philosopher known for his skepticism and empiricism. Hume strives to develop John Rock 's empiricism better through scientific research on our humanity. If we do not clarify this problem, we can not rely on common sense to explain human behavior. In other words, Hume said that it is urgent to observe how humans do this because humans are actually living and working in this world. The main John Locke, Berkeley, Hume are both empiricist philosophers. They all have different opinions, but I agree with three anchor points; the only source of true knowledge is sensual experience, unreliable unless it is based on a strong foundation of sensual experience It is inappropriate knowledge route. There is no evidence that natural thoughts in mind are learned from experience. Every philosopher has developed some of the most attractive concepts. David Hume Hume, David, 1711-76, Scottish philosopher, and historian. Hume brings empiricalism of John Rock and George Berkeley to the logical extremes of fundamental skepticism. He denied the possibility of certain kinds of knowledge and found a series of emotions in his mind and believed that the causal relationship in nature was entirely from B's introduction. The answer to the theme is drawn by the time committee named as illusion by David Hume, and the time committee named human by himself. In the era of modern philosophy, when the influence of Descartes was still important, David Hume brought the argument of killing the Descartes I created and skipping it like a ghost in human perception. You can see not only the theme but also the contrast between Hume and Descartes.

There are many people with various opinions about God. Does he exist? Does not he exist? These questions can be discussed in myriad theories that there are reasons why he exists, methods that do not exist, or do not exist, and there is no way to do it. Theologians argue that God exists and there is a reason to believe that God exists. On the other hand, agnostics, atheists, and followers will think that there is no reason to believe that God exists. Let us consider two theories: theology (the existence of God) and atheism (God does not exist). Imagine that we live in a world where religious texts from different societies and the whole history are fully compatible - even though authors have no way of communicating, they all share the same story I will speak and give out a consistent doctrine. Text reasonably, everyone will think that this is the evidence that contributes to theology. Even under atheism, you can make some complicated explanations for broad consistency: perhaps passing a certain story to us through our evolutionary history is a universal dynamics is. However, we can not deny that theology provides a more direct explanation. God is spreading his word to many different people. (81 - 82) There is much debate about the existence of God about the existence of God. For a long time everyone wanted to prove the existence of God. Some people think that God exists and is proved by many philosophical or scientific foundations and religious reasons. On the other hand, others do not believe in the existence of God and their foundation is proved from many theoretical and scientific point of view. Many people try to prove the existence of God with reason. After Descartes proves its existence, he will think the truth about the essence of God, evidence of the existence of God, and the nature of material objects. The main task in Descartes' meditation is to design a system that allows him to understand the truth. He wants to lay the foundation of all further philosophy

Below is a list of all the skills students have learned in geometry! These skills are categorized by category, and to preview skills, move the mouse over any skill name. To get started, click on any link. IXL keeps track of your scores, and as you progress, the problem automatically increases difficulty! In this article, I will briefly introduce the main branch of the geometry and then describe extensive history processing. For specific branches of geometry, see Euclidean geometry, analytic geometry, projective geometry, differential geometry, non-Euclidean geometry and topology. In some ancient cultures geometric shapes that match the relationships of object length, area, volume were developed. This geometry compiles about 300 generations based on 10 axioms or assumptions in Euclidian elements where hundreds of theorems are proved by deductive logic. Elements are the essence of the century-long axiom deduction method Ancient Greeks practiced experimental geometry such as Egypt and Babylonia for centuries and it absorbed experimental geometry of both cultures. Then they create the first formal mathematics of every type by organizing the geometry with logical rules. An important geometric book of Euclid (400 BC) The Elements forms the basis for most of the geometric foundations of the school. Descartes made the greatest progress in geometry by linking algebra and geometry. One myth is that when you think about placing a point on a plane with a pair of numbers, he is looking around flying around the ceiling. Perhaps this is related to the fact that he is asleep until 11 am everyday. Fermat also discovered coordinate geometry, but that is the Cartesian version we use today. Early in the 17th century, geometry achieved two important developments. The first is the analytic geometry created by René Descartes (1596-1650) and Pierre de Fermat (1601-1665), or geometry including coordinates and equations. This is a necessary prerequisite for the development of calculus and the accurate quantitative science of physics. The second geometrical development in this period was a systematic study of projective geometry by Girard Desargues (1591-1661). Projection geometry is geometry without measurement values ​​and parallel lines, but how research points are related to each other

Brazilian article by Michel de Montaigne "Cannibals" Michel de Montaigne said that when he explained about the Brazilians in the 1580 article "Of Cannibals". People, they must be so perfect, or since we must be so, there is an amazing distance between their personality and our character "(158). However, Montagne does not always maintain this "surprising" distance between barbarians and non-wild people, or between Brazilians and Europeans. Barbarians, and non - barbarians who best embodies the traditional European values, and finally the barbarians opposite the Europeans. Michelle Echem de Montagne, commonly known as Michel de Montagne, was born on February 28, 1533 in Montagne Castle (near Bordeaux, France). Montagne 's wealthy father, Pierre Ekemed Montagne decided to cultivate his son' s intellectual development with Latin as the first language. Montagne did not learn French until 6 years old. His father's death also meant that Montagne inherited family estate. In 1571, Montagne retreated to his castle and protected himself from public daily life. He also began writing personal and subjective thinking about topics such as religion, education, friendship, love, and freedom. Montagne called his original work Essa. He developed a new literary genre: articles Michel de Montaigne's article "Cannibals", Michel de Montaigne said: "According to our criteria, this is truly barbarian, as they describe the Brazilians in the article" Cannibals "in the 1580 article I have to do this completely or we have to do so There is a remarkable distance between their roles and our character "(158). - Descartes' free will to think the first philosophy In my first philosophical thinking, Descartes led the reader to practice methodology in philosophical exploration. After robbing all the wisdom of doubt and false beliefs, he reexamined the nature and structure of existence and tried to universally obtain a valid epistemology without skepticism.

Physical and mental problems Even the physical and mental problems still being discussed today are raising questions about the relationship between the mind and the body. Theorists like Rene Descartes and Thomas Nagel wrote extensively about this subject, but they have many different beliefs. Descartes is a dualist who believes that the mind and body are two different substances that can exist separately. On the contrary, the dual theorist Nagel believes that the mind and body are not important and there are material differences. Discovering solutions to mental and body problems For thousands of years the distinction between mind and body was a philosophical material. The simplest form is that mind and body questions try to answer this question. What is the relationship between mind and body? Philosophers, psychologists, and neuroscientists all develop the theory to try to understand the thought, emotion, and place of self-understanding in nature. First investigation of psychological relationship Philosophy of the heart is a field of philosophy to study the essence of mind, psychological events, psychological functions, psychological attributes, consciousness, and relationships with the body. Physical and spiritual problems, the relationship between the mind and the body, there are other problems not related to the essence of the heart, but it is often seen as the central problem of the philosophy of the heart, It has nothing to do with the relationship. Jose Manuel Rodriguez Delgado wrote as follows. "In the current general usage there is no clear distinction between soul and thinking, it can enter and exit the body as an independent entity." For centuries the mental and physical problems were central problems of spiritual philosophy but there are other factors that are related to the nature of consciousness and not related to its ontological relationship with the body. In any case, the philosopher will try to determine thoughts, and even how to influence the body and affect the body. As stated in the Oxford Philosophy Guide, "The problem of the mind and body is to think about the relationship between the mind and the body, or the relationship between the mental state and the process and the relationship between the physical state and the process There is "(Honderich 613) Philosophy of the heart is a field of philosophy to study the essence of the mind. Although other problems such as difficulty of consciousness and the nature of a particular state of mind are solved, the problem of mind and body is a paradigm in the philosophy of the mind. The spiritual aspects of this research include psychological events, psychological functions, psychological attributes, consciousness, the existence theory of mind, the essence of thinking, the relationship between the mind and the body. Dualism and monism are two central ideas about mind and body, and although there are minor differences, they are not perfectly suited to either one. Dualism is present in both the East and the West tradition (Hindu philosophy and Plato's Sankhya and yoga school), but its entry into the Western philosophy is due to the 17th century René Descartes

The scientific method is a systematic way to help scientists (or anyone) answer questions and solve problems. There are usually six parts Purpose / Question - What do you want to learn? As an example, what kind of bacteria do you have at the door handle of the school? "Or" Is there a girl's ability to react faster than a boy? "Or" The color of the light bulb will affect the growth of the grass Is not it? " Research - We will learn as much as possible. Before starting experiments to get most information, find information on the book, the internet and talk with the teacher. Hypothesis - After doing your research, please try to predict the answer to your question. Another term that is supposed is "reasonable speculation". This is usually expressed as "I am ... (doing something) ... ... (this will happen)". An example is "If I grow up grass seeds under a green light bulb, they will grow faster than plants that grow under a red light bulb." Experiment - It's a fun part! Please design a test or program to determine if your assumption is correct. In our case you place the grass seed under green light, place the seed under red light and observe each seed for a few weeks. For comparison with other species you can also put the lawn under normal white light. If you are doing this for a science fair, you may have to write down the exact work you did for experiments gradually. Conclusion - Review the data and confirm that your assumptions are correct. If grass grows fast under green light, you prove your hypothesis. Otherwise, your assumption is wrong. Even if your assumption is wrong, it is not "bad" just because you found something. This is part of your experiment and you will test (change) to answer your hypothesis. In the above example, the argument will be a different color of the bulb. This is done in response to an independent claim on change. In our case, the dependent variable is the growth of grass seeds. The control should be part of the experiment and you do not have an independent variable. In our case, the grass seed growing under the white (colorless) bulb will be your control. This control makes it possible to compare the results of the experiment In this article I will explain that scientific methods are the basis for building scientific literacy. This article is amazing as it breaks up scientific methods into digestible parts and guides students through the process using sample experiments. It also includes small vocabularies that introduce words in specific fields and allow students to understand the basic concepts of average scientific experiments reliably. This article is ideal for building background knowledge when testing vocabulary. All scientific fields are unified through the use of scientific methods. Scientific methods provide an objective way of scientific experimentation, allowing unbiased interpretation and sophistication of the world. Sir Francis Bacon (1561-1626) first outlined scientific methods and enabled logical and rational problem solving in many scientific fields. In all scientific fields, the main principles of scientific methods are verifiability, predictability, tampering and fairness. Francis Bacon (1561 - 1626) British philosopher, politician, speaker and scientist. Bacon is considered to be "father of empiricism" for his work in the study of scientific phenomena and his work in advancing scientific methodology and structured scientific exploration. He encourages his own example and philosophical experience. An important figure in the scientific revolution of the 17th century. Rene de Carte (1596 - 1650) Rene de Carte is a French philosopher and mathematician. Descartes made a great contribution to the philosophy of rationalism. Descartes' meditation is epoch-making. Because he suspects previous beliefs and is trying to prove their validity through logic. Later empiricists opposed Descartes' method, but his philosophy opened up many topics for further discussi

Plato's Body and Soul Difference A: Plato believes that humans can be divided into three parts: the body, the heart, and the soul. The body is a material part of the body, focusing only on the material world. Through it, we can experience the world in which we live. I want to experience self-satisfaction. It is deadly and when it dies, it really dies. The mind points to the field of thought of heaven, but it is immortal. In our hearts, we can understand the eternal world of the shape. The concept of Aristotle's soul theory is different from Plato and Rene Descartes (1596-1650) in front of him. For him, the soul is not an internal non-material agent acting on the body. Since the impression of the seal is different from the wax it is engraved, there is no difference between the soul and the body. In addition, all parts of the soul are all kinds of abilities, their operation and purpose distinct from each other. Because growth and emotion are two different activities, the power of growth is different from the power of emotion, the sense of vision is different from hearing, the eyes are not different from the ears, the color is different from the sound. Plato 's soul' s view is his binary position, which I think the body and soul are fundamentally different. His soul's theory is advocated for his work "Phaedrus". Among them, Plato is most interested in showing the ability to survive with immortality of the soul and physical death. Like the concept of Aristotle's movement, whether it is the source of his own exercise or animation, he advocates such a perspective, it must be immortal. Plato wrote in Greek philosophy, and the general view is that the soul can not survive death and it spreads like things like breathing and smoke. Plato believes that the soul is a source of its own animation and therefore must be independent. Because things can survive, not through death, only through their hearts. The soul is animated as well as a source of animation. In a simpler sense, the soul is in shape and thus is out of time Perhaps the earliest concept of mind and body (429-347 BC). Like Descartes, Plato believes the heart is the same as the soul. However, unlike Descartes, Plato believes that the soul exists and survives in the body, and has undergone a continuous process of reincarnation or "reincarnation". It is not just a spiritual philosophical doctrine, but an integral part of Plato's metaphysics. One problem with Plato's dualism is that he says that the soul is trapped in the body, but that there is no clear reason to tie the soul to a particular body.

Dialogue and monologue in the lyrical song of 1798, in commemoration of the 200th anniversary of the lyrical song of 1798, it means volume innovation and continuity. It is no longer impossible to believe that "romanticism" has started here (because I taught at least at school). 1798 can not be claimed as a turning point of literary history, but there are some interesting things about controversial facts about the attitude of the novel to the novel and the permanent importance of the reader of the poem in the romantic era Yes. Romanticism officially began in 1798 when William Wordsworth and Samuel Taylor Colleric announced anonymous lyrics. This work shows the official beginning of the literary era that started early in 1798. The work must include what is called "romantic": love for the past, sympathy for children's thoughts Dialogue and monologue in the lyrical song of 1798, in commemoration of the 200th anniversary of the lyrical song of 1798, it means volume innovation and continuity. It is no longer impossible to believe that "romanticism" has started here (because I taught at least at school). - Rene Descartes and Thomas Hobbes: Dialogue When people start an incredible journey through meditation in Descartes, there are many doubts, criticisms and seemingly fundamental problems and will interfere with people. progress Please teach the poet William Wordsworth before deeply digging in "I am in a lonely cloud". In 1798, Washington announced a series called "Sentimental Song" with Samuel Taylor Collick. Romantic literature has emotional expressions and lyrics, centered on the relationship between human beings and the natural world. Let's start analyzing this poem. Let's open our eyes and see all the images and themes that we encounter. The term "image" includes the word "image", but it does not simply refer to the language that forms the image in the mind of the reader. Briefly, images are languages ​​that stimulate senses (visual, auditory, taste, smell, even tactile). Furthermore, when we search for themes in poetry, we are just looking for ideas, emotions, and ideas that combine verses.

The concept of Aristotle's body and soul, and my opinion is the concept of Aristotle's body and soul. According to Aristotle, everything in the world is divided into supervisors and subordinates. People are better than animals, men are better than women, and the soul is better than the body. "The soul is higher than our bodies and our bodies, so people should act through their souls, not through their bodies, the soul will do a better service. The body is the only thing to rule, not political, it is a "born slave". Aristotle's homomorphic mapping model is a combination of substance and form, or a combination of body and soul, which is the two dimensions of existence (for Aristotle, the soul is the form of the body and the body is the matter of the soul). Descartes dualism is to separate matter, mind and soul into two entities or substances within a person. I add that both philosophers regard the soul and thought as the central position (the center of Aristotle and the pineal gland of Descartes' brain). There is controversy in Descartes' case, but it seems that there is a sense of interaction between them (see here). For Descartes, personal personal soul and thoughts are eternal. Aristotle believes that the soul (soul, Ψυχή) is the shape or essence of every living thing; it is not a substance different from the body. Since it is the possession of a soul (a specific type) that makes an organism an organism, the concept of the soulless body or the wrong body soul can not be simply understood. (He believes that some parts of the soul - intelligence - can exist without the body but most people do not exist.) These points are defined as general images of the soul as the "living" body It is a hard spiritual substance to harmonize with. Some critics believe Aristotle's word "soul" is better translated into life force. Aristotle's psychological study is a study of the soul. Aristotle insists that its shape and substance always coexist and Aristotle defines the soul as "body function organized so that it can support the function of life" (Aristotle: one This important biography Is on page 91. When thinking about the basic relationship between the soul and the body, he challenged the doctrine of Pythagoras that the soul is a spiritual entity confined in the body Aristotle's "study" The integration of the early concepts, ie the soul does not exist outside the body, and the concept of Plato 's soul does not exist as another non - physical entity. Essay.com/This This article concerns Aristotle's life event and research, there is a page of recruitment site and work is on article This article is about Aristotle 's lifetime events and research, there is a page on the recruitment site, and that work is also in the article.

Over the years, many philosophers have tried to answer elusive physical and mental problems. There are many ways to understand this problem, but probably not as famous as Descartes dualism. The theory advocated by Reina descartes in the early 17th century is at the center of modern metaphysical discourse. He was respected and censored through the teachings of meditation, and still endured many attempts by others to refute them. One of his greatest critics of the 20th century was Gilbert Lyle. Oxford philosopher Gilbert Lyle (1900-1976) had another way to explain Plato and Descartes' thought. Lyle expressed Descartes dualism as "category error". As its name implies, category errors include placing something in the wrong logical category. In the case of Lyle, Oxford visitors walked around universities, libraries, laboratories, and teachers' rooms and asked, "Can I see the university?" She saw the university Critique of Descartes' Dualism of Gilbert Lyle. Lile refused to accept the view that the body is only a "machine" operated by an independent "ghost" of human thought, but I thought the two are basically related to one another . In the following decades, this sentence became widely known as philosophy, in particular in 1967 when a book of the same name was published by Arthur Koestler, and finally penetrated mass culture and language. I imagined that the phrase of Lyle can transplant the future of Japanese "ghost" to the "shell" of bio robot and influenced Shirow Masamune's "Ghost Shell" (SF comics and animation) It was. "Shell's ghost problem is what happens to humans when the physical difference between humans and machines is gone. Gilbert Lyle has created a famous metaphor called "a ghost in a machine" in order to oppose a "strange" view of the human brain and its accompanying intellectual energy. He considers Descartes' heart and body dualism to be a simple category error - it ignores the basis of mental and psychological behavior in the physical movement of the brain. Since writing of Lyle, neural network has become a backbone of machine learning, and has demonstrated a great power in complicated tasks ranging from image recognition to video game. However, as to all the advances, there remains the question of whether the neural network repeats human brain motion sufficiently accurately, often as implied or claimed with the emergence of "implicitly ghost" (ie, mind) . Is recent argument against the progress of artificial general intelligence reasonable?

The existence of God as a god. One of the most amazing questions most people answer is the following. Does God exist? Webstars Dictionary (Webster's Page 412) defines God as the best being and is considered omnipotent creator and is considered the ruler of the universe. But theologians say he is infinite and perfect spirit, and everything has their source, support and end. (Thiessen, p. 55) In any case, statistics on the Internet by Multipoll CGI show that 86% believe that God exists. Discussion of Rene Descartes on the existence of God Rene Descartes's debate about the existence of God is related to his rationalistic deduction reasoning. Descartes concluded that the truth about the existence of God exists in His idea about the completeness of God and the essence of God (as a complete existence that must exist to be perfect). As a rationalist philosopher, Descartes truncates human knowledge as a product of our sensory data (our senses), but an epistemological sense that our knowledge can be obtained through a process of deducing our own idea I support the position. The medieval society believed that humans existed because God wants them to exist. Descartes does not doubt the existence of God, I doubt that the existence of man is God's desire. He has a problem because he proved the existence of God using a series of theorems. He proved that thought is the essence of thinking. At that time the revolution supports the new idea of ​​"I think myself". It gives independent thinking and free will to human institutions, leading the age of enlightenment. For Descartes, thought proves that our existence is a conscious entity. By solving the survival problem, the thinkers of the 18th and 19th centuries established mathematical and scientific identity. Equivalent thoughts and consciousness do not satisfy thinking thoughts. Beyond the era of reason, we continue to doubt our existence Questions about the existence of God. In the times of Christianity, Judaism, and Muslim, the existence of God has never been questioned. The problem of the existence of God comes from our new way of thinking after these religions. Science reminds us how things work in our world and casts doubt on the existence of God. Because Jesus did not do scientific research in the age of proveing ​​the existence of God, where did history people get the concept of God? Many philosophers

For a long time philosophers have intensely discussed the classification of philosophical epistemology into two categories: rationalism and empiricism. We believe that empiricism can acquire knowledge only by observing facts or by experimenting, but rationalism gains knowledge through logical reasoning. Rationalism and empiricism are themselves a very viable way of thinking in philosophy, but the arguments of these philosophical schools become more powerful when combined. Empiricalism is an excellent position in discussions of empiricism and rationalism. Renedecart supports rationalism. That is acquiring knowledge by reason. David Hume supports empiricism and knowledge after experience through experience. Both positions have strong debate. Descartes warns that "something is genuine, I do not understand it is such thing." Descartes believes that it is necessary to "assure that rationality is used for everything" in order to obtain true knowledge. Hume, on the other hand, believes that the connection of ideas is our knowledge. He explains this empirical approach, using three principles of relationship between ideas, ie similarity, time or place continuity, causality. Hume believes that we associate these ideas in our mind with the ideas we gained through experience. Essay.com/a Thesis using direct citation of Hume and Descartes to demonstrate positivism against rationalism Rationalism is often contrasted with empiricism. In fact, these views are not mutually exclusive. For example, the philosophy of science is rational and empirical. But knowledge is basically based on experience if you think that the end of the experience comes from experience through five external senses or through inner feelings like pain and happiness. Similarly, some plausible versions argue that starting from the basic principle like geometric axioms, all possible global knowledge can be deduced derived. The philosophers who discussed this point are Spinoza and Leibniz, and efforts to solve epistemological and metaphysical problems raised by Descartes brought about the development of a subjective approach to rationality. Spinoza and Leibnitz believe that, in principle, at least all knowledge including scientific knowledge can be obtained only by rationality.

Regardless of whether we can expect as a man, we have the ability to prove or refute God 's existence. In general, most people say that it is impossible to prove the existence of non-importance, as not all of the reality we can imagine. The question of whether human beings need to prove the existence of God has been a continuous topic that has been debated for centuries. Surprisingly, it is philosophical to prove that God exists, but some say that God can prove to be fictitious. Do people need to prove that God exists? Are ontological controversies about the existence of God from design theory and evolution theory are moral and can not believe in God? Can God and true evil be able to reconcile? Can I be sure that I have a soul? Is powerful determinism reasonable? Does the Turing test challenge human identity? This course covers the subdisciplin of three important philosophies of morality, epistemology, and religion. In this article we will create arguments containing our own views on specific topics related to one of these areas. The list of topics that can be selected is as follows. We recommend that you select the topic you want to write or the topic you considered before. (One way to think about this is to think about the problem that worries you, makes you interested or irritated.) There is much debate about the existence of God about the existence of God. For a long time everyone wanted to prove the existence of God. Some people think that God exists and is proved by many philosophical or scientific foundations and religious reasons. On the other hand, others do not believe in the existence of God, and their foundation is proved from many theoretical and scientific point of view. Many people try to prove the existence of God with reason. After Descartes proves its existence, people will consider the truth about the essence of God, evidence of the existence of God, and the nature of material objects. The main task in Descartes' meditation is to design a system that allows him to understand the truth. He wants to lay the foundation of all further philosophy The medieval society believed that humans existed because God wants them to exist. Descartes does not doubt the existence of God, I doubt that the existence of man is God's desire. He has a problem because he proved the existence of God using a series of theorems. He proved that thought is the essence of thinking. At that time the revolution supports the new idea of ​​"I think myself". It gives independent thinking and free will to human institutions, leading the age of enlightenment. For Descartes, thought proves that our existence is a conscious entity. By solving the survival problem, the thinkers of the 18th and 19th centuries established mathematical and scientific identity. Equivalent thoughts and consciousness do not satisfy thinking thoughts. Beyond the era of reason, we continue to doubt our existence

Heidegger wants to transcend: Metaphysics or Nietzsche Abstract: In this article, we focus first on Heidegger attempting to solve the problem of "metaphysics" and the desire to transcend it. Then I will try to appreciate his idea of ​​transcending metaphysics and his interpretation of Nietzsche anthropology that he thinks is the best achievement of metaphysics. In today's speech, we will first focus on Heidegger's attempt to solve the problem of "metaphysics" and the desire to transcend it. In "introduction of metaphysics" Heidegger said that the fundamental problem of metaphysics is "existence rather than not exist". This is a matter that promotes "existence and time". "I want to know the problem, no matter who wants it, it will be decided, regardless of who will put it in this will ... ... will be decided." And based on this. For Nietzsche, "The world is the will of power - nothing else!" This insists his will and claims his will and power of will. When reaching "so-called thinking", Heidegger gives up this place of view and places it as an appropriate place to doubt its existence. In order to think, our determination must include "not do" Heidegger 's Nietzsche interpretation is based on Heidegger' s summary and existence history, especially insight into the interpretation of modern metaphysics. Still, it remains to be seen whether Nietzsche has inherently and intentionally abandoned the metaphysical dimension of some problem in his concept of the universe. His cosmological philosophy "drama" has originality which is not metaphysical. Even early works show mystery of drama ... I would like to disagree with this. I think Heidegger said Nietzsche's project is a correct metaphysical project, but when he claims that Nietzsche's metaphysics is basically Descartes he is wrong. It can not be denied that Nietzsche's project is scientific in many respects, but as I mentioned earlier, this is almost the same as saying his project is Descartes. Instead, I believe Nietzsche attacked scientific thinking (and in a broader sense enlightened) scientific thinking, re-educating science, and attacked happy science. From Anthropology, all Thai sayings are useful here: "Assess the greatness of the outstanding Greeks who created science! People who tell them, the most heroic stories in the history of human spirit Let's talk. "28. Science is not the enemy of science, but the science he claims is not an abstract Descartes rationalism.

Discussion on Dualism Introduction Discussions on the true nature of man, the existence of free will and the validity of science are focused on two philosophical theories of dualism and materialism. In support of dualism, supporters believe that there are two types of substances, human beings, substances and non-material substances. Meanwhile, since materialism proposes that people and things are the same, there is no other non-material existence. These arguments provide a good basis for philosophers to believe substantive dualism. But there are also serious objections. The first major discussion on dualism is simplicity. The material list says that it is more reasonable to subscribe to them because their opinions are simpler (they only believe in physical things). The materialistic view is easy to prove, as it is no doubt that there are material substances and substances that are not material are current hypotheses. This argument is very irrational to me. You should choose a philosophical point of view, as one person makes more sense to you. Because one person is not because your idea is small. One argument against dualism is about causality. If consciousness (thought) can exist independently of physical reality (brain), we must explain how to create physical memory of consciousness. Therefore, dualism must explain how consciousness affects physical reality. One of the major objections to dual interactivity is the lack of explanation of how materials and non-materials interact. Various non-material thought factors of dualism influence substance bodies, and vice versa, especially in the 20th century are attacked strongly by various aspects. Dualist critics often ask how completely irrelevant things completely affect substances - this is a fundamental problem of causality This paper shows Descartes' interactive material dualism, which we analyze and evaluate with this paper. This paper points out that this discussion on Descartes' interactive material dualism is unhealthy, although its second premise is wrong, it is inherently effective, but it is unhealthy. Despite the logical framework and deductive validity, we discussed this argument, but it is inevitably wrong due to the second premise. In this paper, by presenting the uniqueness of psychological and physical attributes and states, we propose some arguments and secondary qualities that support material duality. In this paper, we also consider the main criticism of interactive material dualism and the problem of physical and mental interaction. If this article is totally effective, the second premise that you can agree with Descartes' discussion as a reader is false.

My body is only a product of my senses, but I know that my thoughts and souls must exist in this universe. This led to Descartes to believe that he must exist. As he has the ability to think that he is present, this proves that he has something at least in a non-material world. "I am convinced that there is nothing in the world - there is no sky, no earth, no idea, no body, not because I do not exist. In this meditation, Descartes gives his famous modal theory, that is to truly distinguish between mind and body. (This is in the first part of the paragraph, first of all I know all the things I clearly and clearly imagine.) First of all, look at the options of the above principle. What is the real difference? In case of __________, A and B are really different. Therefore, the conclusion of the Cartesian argument does not say that the body and mind exist but it exists. (Likewise, even if water and dirt come together to form mud, it is actually different.) Reconstruct the discussion of Descartes. Psychological history of many psychology in the mind and body includes attempts to solve physical and mental problems and how they interact. Thanks to the influential work of René Descartes written around 1630, the philosophical distinction between the body and the mind can be traced back to the Greeks, but first the systematic explanation of the relationship between the body and the mind You should. When he is a friend of Descartes and frequently journalist Marin Mersenne wrote him Galileo ... Language is one of the most powerful media in the human world, not only through languages ​​but also through visuals and media. Music to express words. Language is the silence between spoken words and phrases and the next phrase. In our culture we are trying to mark objects as monochrome. It is either or this, but when something is missing from the language, we try to assign a color to it rather than making them real. I have two people. Many philosophers try to explain the difference between body and mind. They are trying to explain how the body affects the mind, how the mind influences the body, and whether the bodies can exist with each other. The reason is to inspire people to try to replace beliefs in religious reasoning with evidence of scientific facts and reasoning. - Many celebrities seem to be experiencing poor childhood. Jack London is a very difficult childhood, full of poverty and uncertainty, but he is one of the most famous authors of the 20th century. The lack of stability in living in London and the stages he experienced as sailors, playing cards, Klondike Argona, and self-made millionaires are all pages of his writing.

Psychological history of many psychology in the mind and body includes attempts to solve physical and mental problems and how they interact. Thanks to the influential work of René Descartes written around 1630, the philosophical distinction between the body and the mind can be traced back to the Greeks, but first the systematic explanation of the relationship between the body and the mind You should. Descartes soon suppressed his own paper when Marc Mersenne, a friend of Descartes and often a journalist, wrote a letter telling Galileo's fate in the hands of the Inquisition Officer. Mind and body Many contemporary philosophers are discussing the concept of physical and mental interactions. Some people think that our thoughts and bodies are different, so they exist separately, while others think that they exist as a whole. In this article I will present two rationalism philosophical views on this issue. One is Rene Descartes and the other is Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. From a philosophical point of view, rationalists are not complete but acquire knowledge through ... but everyone has their own understanding of what it means. Everyone on this planet is doing some kind of body correction to achieve the sensation they can recognize and feel. Cosmetic to cosmetic surgery, piercing to the face implant, hair styling to the tattoo, everything in between, changing our bodies is part of our lifestyle Whether cosmetic surgery or plastic surgery is beneficial or harm the individual's body or mind. The two major departments of orthopedic surgery are reconstruction and cosmetic ("orthopedic surgeon"). This is why the terms cosmetic and plastics are used interchangeably in the medical field. Cosmetic plastic surgery and reconstructive surgery are not exactly the same, but some think that all surgery is the same. - Do you know that it is one of the highest amount of work a surgeon can earn? Surgeons saved lives most of their lives and are working hard. Pediatric surgeons work exclusively for children and young people. These experts have undergone years of study and hours of training. They are fully committed to that possibility and are constantly committed to helping people. Pediatric surgeons focus on the ability to do what they are doing.

Definition of the Two Reasons of David Hume The definition of two reasons in "Humanity" and "Exploration of Human Understanding" by David Hume was the focus of his controversy on the actual view of causality. The majority of the discussion focused on the lack of consistency between the two definitions and the definition as part of the larger text. Regarding the latter objection, Hume points out in the advertisement of the author that the paper "predicted research before leaving the university", so it can be supplemented by asserting the explanation proposed in the survey. He did not announce it. David Hume Hume, David, 1711-76, Scottish philosopher, and historian. Hume brings empiricalism of John Rock and George Berkeley to the logical extremes of fundamental skepticism. He denied the possibility of certain kinds of knowledge and found a series of emotions in his mind and believed that the causal relationship in nature was entirely from B's introduction. The answer to the theme is drawn by the time committee named as illusion by David Hume, and the time committee named human by himself. In the era of modern philosophy, when the influence of Descartes was still important, David Hume brought the argument of killing the Descartes I created and skipping it like a ghost in human perception. You can see not only the theme but also the contrast between Hume and Descartes. Our recognition and memory The famous philosophers David Hume and Rene Descartes are those who are looking for answers and definitions of individual identity. Both of them considered their ideas and issued two different conclusions. Some people think that individual identity can not be understood, but others confirm that their certainty is their thinking and perception. David Hume begins discussing personal identity by denying this It is usually defined in three different ways: material quality, biological and personal identity. In an article by David Hume and John Locke, they studied the meaning of identity with three simple sub theories. Both agreed on specific functions, but the other characteristics were totally different. Are they identified as the same person over time? Hume and Locke wrote a paper on concrete assumptions about identity. The author provides various examples to the reader

Dualism of the mind and the body is often regarded as a central problem of the philosophy of the heart. The problem of mind and body dualism is that it is not clear whether Descartes is really an independent existence in the discussion or whether the mind is the brain itself. Descartes believes that people have two main elements, physical and non-material, called heart and soul. As a scientist, Descartes believes in the mechanics theory of matter, but he is also very religious and I do not believe people are simply mechanical creatures like watches. Therefore, Descartes believes the mind will lead the mind. First, there are two types of artificial intelligence. It is a computer that can have artificial intelligence and human ability. This is in contrast to artificial narrow intelligence that artificial intelligence computers can do what humans can do, but only within narrow limits. - Ben Thompson, Strategic Finance Minister, Steven Mnuchin recently laughed a lot of Twitter posts as lack of understanding about AI was lacking. He said that he is not interested in automating artificial intelligence, but autonomous vehicles say they plan to shuttle from the coast to the coast in the near future. We have not yet implemented "strong" artificial intelligence (also called artificial intelligence) that can achieve all intellectual tasks human beings can achieve. However, significant advances in artificial intelligence over the past few years have shown that strong artificial intelligence can be achieved in the near future. Artificial intelligence requires appropriate machine learning algorithms, data and computational power. Many of today's most promising artificial intelligence techniques use neural networks. Neural networks can be small, simple, or large and powerful. The larger the neural network, the stronger it is. To achieve the limits of neural networks as well as today's artificial intelligence capabilities, a powerful computer chip

... ... It is not a big concept, it begins with the concept of God. The idea that such existence exists only in thought and does not actually exist includes contradiction. Because existence of lack of actual existence is not without big presence. ... Descartes proved the existence of God as soon as possible. However, Descartes does not know that this evidence does not contain errors unless he believes his clear and clear understanding of the step of reasoning is correct. Therefore, clarity and standard of independent recognition, René Descartes 'Discussion on God's Presence Rene Descartes' questions about the existence of God are related to his rationalistic deduction reasoning. Descartes concluded that the truth about the existence of God exists within his understanding of the perfect God and the nature of God (as a perfect being, it must exist for perfection) . - All moral arguments about the existence of God are based on the principle that all of us share the common sense of morality. Despite cultural differences, in a broad sense, people all over the world have ambiguous thoughts about right and wrong; the moral argument to the existence of God is that this mutual understanding is evidence of the existence of God I will say that there is. Immanuel Kant advocated this argument (not a moral argument); a god as a source of objective morality Before attempting to explain and evaluate the moral argument about God's existence, it is beneficial to understand the purpose of God's existential argument. Of course, although views on this are diverse, most contemporary supporters believe that these discussions do not regard theological argument as "evidence." They should provide valid arguments and prerequisites that reasonable people can not deny. Such Success Criteria clearly sets high criteria for success, and proponents of the argument of the argument almost fail in the fields other than formal logic, philosophical discussions of interesting conclusions to meet such criteria It correctly points out that. Is the premise of these arguments reasonable, at least for reasonable people, more reasonable than refusal? Discussion that is most widely accepted and criticized about the existence of God. My purpose of this article is to explain why the cosmological argument is proof of the existence of God, to understand that it is the importance of the posteriori controversy, and to my common objection It is to observe the position of. First of all, as a living person on earth, we can safely conclude that most of the things that exist today have their cause. I confirmed that there is a reason.

Among his ideas about the first philosophical meditation, the third and V Rene provided discussion about the existence of God. Controversy over the existence of God: If he can envision some idea in so many objective reality it must come from something more formal than he has To do. God is an infinite matter, and he is just a finite substance. As God's thought does not give energy to itself, he concludes that God is the cause of this idea and therefore must exist. There is much debate about the existence of God about the existence of God. For a long time everyone wanted to prove the existence of God. Some people think that God exists and is proved by many philosophical or scientific foundations and religious reasons. On the other hand, others do not believe in the existence of God and their foundation is proved from many theoretical and scientific point of view. Many people try to prove the existence of God with reason. After Descartes proves its existence, he will think the truth about the essence of God, evidence of the existence of God, and the nature of material objects. The main task in Descartes' meditation is to design a system that allows him to understand the truth. He wants to lay the foundation of all further philosophy The medieval society believed that humans existed because God wants them to exist. Descartes does not doubt the existence of God, I doubt that the existence of man is God's desire. He has a problem because he proved the existence of God using a series of theorems. He proved that thought is the essence of thinking. At that time the revolution supports the new idea of ​​"I think myself". It gives independent thinking and free will to human institutions, leading the age of enlightenment. For Descartes, thought proves that our existence is a conscious entity. By solving the survival problem, the thinkers of the 18th and 19th centuries established mathematical and scientific identity. Equivalent thoughts and consciousness do not satisfy thinking thoughts. Beyond the era of reason, we continue to doubt our existence

The existence of God prove that the existence of the transcendental God can be proved deductively by logically deducting the concept of God. Therefore, God must exist so that God can not exist. I think it is necessary to investigate the version of Ansem's ontological debate to answer the question of whether God's existence can be proved a priori. RenéDescartes, often called the father of modern philosophy, has developed Anselm's assertion when trying to prove the existence of God in the meaning of the word "God". Ontological arguments are a priori arguments. The basis of these arguments depends on the understanding of the essence of the human god. The definition of Anselm's god is "an extremely perfect existence", which is the basis of his argument. God must be something that can not be considered absent: if you imagine a triangle, one of its main features is that it has three sides and three corners. These are triangle predicates. Descartes has expanded his point of view. This time I mentioned the attribute of God. If you imagine something perfect, it must be more perfect if it exists. Also, the most perfect ones have all attributes including existence. Therefore, Descartes believes that a very perfect existence has all the predicates. Descartes' ontology (or the transcendental theory) is difficult to understand the aspect of his philosophy most appealing. The charm with discussion arises from the effort to prove the existence of God from a simple and powerful assumption. The existence immediately derives from a clear and unique idea of ​​the complete existence. Ironically, the simplicity of discussion also produced some misunderstandings. This is partly because Descartes tends to formalize it in various ways. The main description of this discussion appears in the fifth meditation. This is a question of order and relationship between these two different evidences after the initial causal debate of God in the third meditation. Descartes repeats ontological arguments with other central texts including philosophical principles. He also defended him with the first, second, and fifth reply, against the hard opposition of some famous people of those days.

Does God exist? In this article, I will create a balanced discussion for many years, and many people are used to building faith based on the existence of God. Furthermore, due to the Iraq War and the recent terrorist attacks, the topic of God over the past few years is such an important issue. This is very important. In the Iraq war, the Muslim countries in the Middle East have a dominant white Christian country, and each country has an opposite faith. Further upgrades could lead to rebellion against fundamentalist organizations around the world. "Does God exist?" Fortunately, Richard Dawkins wrote a new book "God's Thoughts". This is exactly the answer to this question. After all, the answer is "No, God does not exist" (Do not deny that Dawkins reached his conclusion before the card won the World Series). Power is not enough to convince some experts. Literary critic Terry Eagleton provides an example of his idea for London Book Review. Eagleton's comments are discussed in some of my favorite blogs: 3 Quarks Daily, Pharyngula, Uncertain Principles, Valve (2), There is much debate about the existence of God about the existence of God. For a long time everyone wanted to prove the existence of God. Some people think that God exists and is proved by many philosophical or scientific foundations and religious reasons. On the other hand, others do not believe in the existence of God and their foundation is proved from many theoretical and scientific point of view. Many people try to prove the existence of God with reason. After Descartes proves its existence, he will think the truth about the essence of God, evidence of the existence of God, and the nature of material objects. The main task in Descartes' meditation is to design a system that allows him to understand the truth. He wants to lay the foundation of all further philosophy How does God exist? Does he exist? Does not he exist? These questions can be discussed in myriad theories that there are reasons why he exists, methods that do not exist, or do not exist, and there is no way to do it. Theologians argue that God exists and there is a reason to believe that God exists. On the other hand, agnostics, atheists, and followers will think that there is no reason to believe that God exists. For some people, they have no doubt about the existence of God ... the existence of God was a problem since the concept of God was imagined. Descartes tried to prove the existence of God, argued against his theory of the devil, and showed that there is no doubt that there is some external existence. He is looking for a definite certainty, the foundation on which he can base on all his beliefs and know that they are real facts. Descartes' overall project is to find a definite certainty that he can be based on all his knowledge and beliefs. Foundation

Bringing drama, movies and philosophy (1) Wittgenstein said once, "A typical American movie that is innocent and stupid can make it all stupid with it. Stupid America A movie well learned from people. "(Wittgenstein 57e). He pointed out that humor and humor in some movies can be a tool for education. The ability of a movie to respond to laughter is philosophical. The comments by Wittgenstein are themselves playful and intensive, but they lead us to the philosophical aspect of some sort of movie. The concept of the whole movie and the concept of PreCrime stresses the importance of doubt and the role that doubt can play in philosophy and movies. In the whole movie, doubt is a very important theme, a theme playing an important role in the world of philosophy. Descartes is one of the most important and influential philosophers of the present age and was often referred to as the "father of modern philosophy" in works in the first half of the 17th century. In Descartes, the first philosophical meditation, the concept of doubt plays an important role, especially in his first meditation. Descartes says in the first meditation as follows. "Even if five senses deceive us from time to time, it is the same meaning when it is a matter of very small and distant" "Descartes, 14) In the summary of the authors of philosophers' ideas on drama and art, you may see the daily adaptability of philosophy: "When we fall into a wonderful drama, music performance or moving film, We will create a "world" experience for us, this is how art reveals the truth to us In the game between the world of art creation and our world, we are completely new We will see our lives in a way. Philosophy can be a friend of theology when philosophy reveals meanings directly or indirectly, mediates the truth, and helps us to see ourselves in a new and better way I will. Christianity and Western thought: Postmodern journey of the 20th century (Christianity and Western thought)

Evaluating Descartes' claims based on a clear and unique perception of the difference between the body and the mind When discussing the difference between the body and the heart, Descartes attempts to prove that the two are separate substances that can exist separately . It is useful to outline the discussion of Descartes based on clarity and unique perception by listing his premise and conclusion. Then, the paper analyzes each assumption in turn, thinking that the argument failed because his assumption is wrong. Psychological history of many psychology in the mind and body includes attempts to solve physical and mental problems and how they interact. Thanks to the influential work of René Descartes written around 1630, the philosophical distinction between the body and the mind can be traced back to the Greeks, but first the systematic explanation of the relationship between the body and the mind You should. When he is a friend of Descartes and frequently journalist Marin Mersenne wrote him Galileo ... Language is one of the most powerful media in the human world, not only through languages ​​but also through visuals and media. Music to express words. Language is the silence between spoken words and phrases and the next phrase. In our culture we are trying to mark objects as monochrome. It is either or this, but when something is missing from the language, we try to assign a color to it rather than making them real. I have two people. Many philosophers try to explain the difference between body and mind. They are trying to explain how the body affects the mind, how the mind influences the body, and whether the bodies can exist with each other. The reason is to inspire people to try to replace beliefs in religious reasoning with evidence of scientific facts and reasoning. - Many celebrities seem to be experiencing poor childhood. Jack London is a very difficult childhood, full of poverty and uncertainty, but he is one of the most famous authors of the 20th century. The lack of stability in living in London and the stages he experienced as sailors, playing cards, Klondike Argona, and self-made millionaires are all pages of his writing. In this meditation, Descartes gives his famous modal theory, that is to truly distinguish between mind and body. (This is in the first part of the paragraph, first of all I know all the things I clearly and clearly imagine.) First of all, look at the options of the above principle. What is the real difference? In case of __________, A and B are really different. Therefore, the conclusion of the Cartesian argument does not say that the body and mind exist but it exists. (Likewise, even if water and dirt come together to form mud, it is actually different.) Reconstruct the discussion of Descartes.

Gilbert Lyle 's concept of mind in the concept of mind Gilbert Lyle uses his own words to try "to explode the myth of Descartes dualism". His main method in this paper is to explain why writing a thought and a body in a language semantically similar is a logical error. Please take the first step towards direction. So, if you want to reach this hypothetical area, the following free discussion is at Lyle and his starting point, ie. The concept of Gilbert Lyle's mind The concept of Gilbert Lyle's mind (1949) is a criticism of different concepts of mind and body, a rejection of philosophical theory about different mental states and physical conditions. Lyle believes that the traditional way of thinking and body relationship (the method adopted in Descartes philosophy) assumes a fundamental difference between heart and matter. According to Ryle, this assumption is a basic 'category error'. Because it tries to analyze the relationship between "mind" and "body" as if it were a term of the same logical category. Gilbert Lyle 's concept of mind in the concept of mind Gilbert Lyle uses his own words to try "to explode the myth of Descartes dualism". His main method in this paper is to explain why writing a thought and a body in a language semantically similar is a logical error. Please take the first step towards direction. So, if you want to reach this hypothetical area, the following free discussion is at Lyle and his starting point, ie. In the 1950s, in English-speaking countries the term "philosophical philosophy" became the currency. This is mainly an explanation of the discussion caused by Gilbert Lyle's pioneering work "the concept of mind" announced in 1949. Lile's work is contrary to Descartes' view that the mental state is a meaningless state. This discussion and subsequent discussion has linked the resilience of psychological events to the problem of action tendencies. The central argument of Ryle is that we misunderstand "logic" of words such as "belief", "emotion", "consciousness". He believes that the theory of traditional Cartesian psychology "misunderstood the differences in personality and uses the difference between the unforgivable psychological reasons and the visible myth of the visible physical effect" (p. 32).

For centuries seeking to find out who we are, where we are from, where we go after we die, and what governs our world I have fascinated mankind. Famous philosophers dedicated their lives to the development of the theory, but the closest theory of success is that their theory is not to be disputed. "I do not know" to one of the oldest problems of civilization may be the only true answer as facts have not been proven to be true. The idea that we can not know the answers to these questions and many other questions leads to the theory of skepticism. Since we have different knowledge by having different experiences, we can doubt our knowledge. But this is how the "good" God wants. As easily as denying the premise, we can deny evil demon theory by rejecting premise 2. In addition, Descartes denies any theory, but still can use his same thought process. He can deny evil Satan theory using Descartes' knowledge structure and deny one of the facilities. Another way to reject premise 2 is to define knowledge. Descartes insists that knowledge must be undoubted. It must be applied to all other theories and ideas. This is the reason why evil devil theory still exists. However, if Descartes defines knowledge as the fact that his perception is proved, evil devil theory may still be wrong. For example, knowledge comes from our perception, so we do not perceive this demon. According to premise 1, the devil does not exist. Can the negative premise 2 prove that the discussion of skepticism is wrong? Descartes chose to keep premise 2 the truth, because he believes that knowledge must be undoubted. However, premise 2 can be refused as easily as premise 1 is rejected. There are two ways to deny the premise that the first method can be traced back to Socrates. The second method involves the definition of knowledge. Socrates asked questions: What is the difference between knowledge and pure faith? Socrates replied that knowledge is a true belief and believers have sufficient reasons. Then Aristotle asked about how knowledge is possible. Faith can only prove its validity by relying on other reasonable beliefs. This leads to the view that all knowledge is proved by other knowledge and the chain keeps stretching in the reverse direction until the basic basic belief has no basic reason. The BIV argument is valid. Therefore, the relevant alternative theorist must deny one of the premises. They agree that you do not know that you are not a BIV, so they accept the first premise. Therefore, they reject the second premise. Even if you do not know that you are not a BIV, you know that you have a hand. In fact, this means that the relevant alternative theorists deny the principle of termination. Let's consider this detail. A related alternative theorist says that this approach has two main problems. First of all, accusing BIV's alternative means is irrelevant unless supplementing the principle description explaining the reason for deprecating the alternative of BIV. Second, the principle of closure has a high degree of internal rationality. If you refuse it, a so-called abominable conjunction is generated. This is one:

The existence of God "I can not think of anything obviously opposed to myself, but I can think of the opposite of the proposition" God exists ". (Thomas Aquinas) Some say that God is the omnipotence of the universe and the omniscient being. In other words, God is omnipotent, knows and manages the universe, but only to prove the existence of God, it's just ridiculous. People who laugh always are not always right. There is much debate about the existence of God about the existence of God. For a long time everyone wanted to prove the existence of God. Some people think that God exists and is proved by many philosophical or scientific foundations and religious reasons. On the other hand, others do not believe in the existence of God and their foundation is proved from many theoretical and scientific point of view. Many people try to prove the existence of God with reason. After Descartes proves its existence, he will think the truth about the essence of God, evidence of the existence of God, and the nature of material objects. The main task in Descartes' meditation is to design a system that allows him to understand the truth. He wants to lay the foundation of all further philosophy The medieval society believed that humans existed because God wants them to exist. Descartes does not doubt the existence of God, I doubt that the existence of man is God's desire. He has a problem because he proved the existence of God using a series of theorems. He proved that thought is the essence of thinking. At that time the revolution supports the new idea of ​​"I think myself". It gives independent thinking and free will to human institutions, leading the age of enlightenment. For Descartes, thought proves that our existence is a conscious entity. By solving the survival problem, the thinkers of the 18th and 19th centuries established mathematical and scientific identity. Equivalent thoughts and consciousness do not satisfy thinking thoughts. Beyond the era of reason, we continue to doubt our existence

Montagne, Descartes, Pascal believe in the unpredictable best truth in universal social truth. Montaigne said that contradiction is not a contradiction of truth (Mengtian, p. 75). Do not believe that the possibility of lack of this truth contradiction is deemed skeptical - skepticism is for some reason and I do not want to believe anything. The same skepticism was interpreted by Descartes as falsehood of self-rebellion, and he said "I think, hence I am" (Descartes, p. 24). what? This question is a question in Plato's famous question "What is the truth?" The answer is "the word of God". The truth is that God is told. The reality is determined by the Creator God, and only the god of truth tells us that we can understand the truth. God did this with the words of the Bible truth. In this sense, the Bible is the only true philosophy book. Therefore, the foundation of the formation of Christian philosophy must be the word "Bible". Where? The only correct answer may be what God has said. Where? This is God's universe. This was created by God and we can understand creation only by believing what the Creator said. He did not elect to reveal everything about the universe, but what he revealed was truthful and satisfactory. For example, this helps to discuss the nature, nature, and supernatural issues of matter. "We have a double pattern of truth in the faith of God ... Some truth about God is beyond all the power of human reason. In fact, the philosopher is a natural reason for the light of light Under the guidance we are proving these truths about God, while the truth of finding or verifying information is the truth of discovery and verification of human information.The first type of truth is transcended rationality, And let's call the latter as the truth of natural reason. There are various ways to understand and access all the truth There is the truth. God is the ultimate truth. God is a greater truth than heaven. I believe that this is an effective religion if you believe in God the God, but do not speak about heaven at all and there is an organized religion that does not know anything about death. But if the same religion is afraid of death, I will say that this is an incomplete religion. You are an important part of the truth that will never die by death. There is only one god, one creator, one blissful existence. This is the most important element of the truth. God transcended time and space. But God is also in time and space. God does not belong to this universe, but God is in everywhere in this universe. God is invisible, but you can take that form if you wish. It is because everything is possible with God. He created the law of nature, but he created the reality itself, so he can freely change the reality.

In order to get used to distinguishing between existence and essence in all other things in God, I convince myself that existence may be separated from the essence of God, so God actually exists You may think that you do not. Pillar Eleven Gods and substances consisting of infinite attributes, each attribute must represent and present the eternal and infinite essence. "Evidence: If this is denied, imagine that God does not exist, if possible, then his essence does not contain existence. There is much debate about the existence of God about the existence of God. For a long time everyone wanted to prove the existence of God. Some people think that God exists and is proved by many philosophical or scientific foundations and religious reasons. On the other hand, others do not believe in the existence of God, and their foundation is proved from many theoretical and scientific point of view. Many people try to prove the existence of God with reason. After Descartes proves its existence, people will consider the truth about the essence of God, evidence of the existence of God, and the nature of material objects. The main task in Descartes' meditation is to design a system that allows him to understand the truth. He wants to lay the foundation of all further philosophy The medieval society believed that humans existed because God wants them to exist. Descartes does not doubt the existence of God, I doubt that the existence of man is God's desire. He has a problem because he proved the existence of God using a series of theorems. He proved that thought is the essence of thinking. At that time the revolution supports the new idea of ​​"I think myself". It gives independent thinking and free will to human institutions, leading the age of enlightenment. For Descartes, thought proves that our existence is a conscious entity. By solving the survival problem, the thinkers of the 18th and 19th centuries established mathematical and scientific identity. Equivalent thoughts and consciousness do not satisfy thinking thoughts. Beyond the era of reason, we continue to doubt our existence

If they do not help to make the world a better place, then both types of people are wasting the chips they consumed. In other words, the third category is excellent - a person who uses his knowledge to make our world a better place. In connection with this most important question, it is in this way that we evaluate human value. To illustrate this principle, consider all the people who comment on the cards gold summit in Singapore. Observe how they use their knowledge. People who are proud of their deep understanding of this issue and who missed self-realizing prophecies should help the world by releasing themselves from public dialogue. This person is valuable to the world when a person can provide AFFIRMATION to playing cards and Kim Jong Il and help other countries show positive direction. Otherwise it is best for him to narrow the gap to reduce the number of frustrations. The third category of people - regarding these questions, knowledge, trust and certainty - is the starting point for rebuilding people and knowledge bases who have to develop methods for themselves. Descartes himself is such a person, but when we read and contemplate his work, we should ask myself whether we are in the third category or not. Here is a fairly clever structure - stories, epistemology and methodology. Completely follow hyperbolic allegations along Descartes then do not truly remove it absolutely - you are the first class, and you should not read Descartes Knowledge ... yes, I am skipping the tense now ... Knowledge is a general field containing all content - people who think he owns knowledge (like you What is included. This field contains everything you can know and it is bigger than what we imagine. For the purposes of ourselves (social, governmental, economic), we think it useful to make rules on the use of information. We use different names to refer to them - copyrights, patents, intellectual property etc. We will use these packages to keep the market running for general purpose, to ensure that funds flow freely through society and encourage rewarding innovation.

Control experiment: In the control group and the experiment group, only one factor (variable) is different Constant: The factors of the control group and the experiment group have not changed. Please confirm that the displayed result is due to only the factor being tested. • Qualitative data is descriptive and includes features that are often unachievable. It is explosion proof. "A wound looks older" "" Animals are healthy and alert " Theory: formed by repeated observations, related hypothesis tests and backed by massive evidence Example: Cell Theory and Evolution The The The The The The The The The The The The The The The The The The The The The The The The The The The The The The The In this article I will explain that scientific methods are the basis for building scientific literacy. This article is great as it divides scientific methods into digestible parts and guides students through the process using sample experiments. It also includes small vocabularies that introduce words in specific fields and allow students to understand the basic concepts of average scientific experiments reliably. This article is ideal for building background knowledge when testing vocabulary. All scientific fields are unified through the use of scientific methods. Scientific methods provide an objective way of scientific experimentation, allowing unbiased interpretation and sophistication of the world. Sir Francis Bacon (1561-1626) first outlined scientific methods and enabled logical and rational problem solving in many scientific fields. In all scientific fields, the main principles of scientific methods are verifiability, predictability, tampering, and fairness. Francis Bacon (1561 - 1626) British philosopher, politician, speaker and scientist. Bacon is considered "father of empiricism" because it is working on scientific phenomena research, systematization of scientific methodology, and structured scientific inquiry. He encourages his own example and philosophical experience. An important figure in the scientific revolution of the 17th century. Rene de Carte (1596 - 1650) Rene de Carte is a French philosopher and mathematician. Descartes made a great contribution to the philosophy of rationalism. Descartes' meditation is epoch-making. Because he suspects previous beliefs and is trying to prove their validity through logic. Later empiricists opposed Descartes' method, but his philosophy opened up many topics for further discussion. Descartes has been proved to be "the existence of God", but his doubt is an important step in promoting reasons over faith.

The concept of Gilbert Lyle's mind The concept of Gilbert Lyle's mind (1949) is a criticism of different concepts of mind and body, a rejection of philosophical theory about different mental states and physical conditions. Lyle believes that the traditional way of thinking and body relationship (the method adopted in Descartes philosophy) assumes a fundamental difference between heart and matter. According to Ryle, this assumption is a basic 'category error'. Because it tries to analyze the relationship between "mind" and "body" as if it were a term of the same logical category. Gilbert Lyle 's concept of mind in the concept of mind Gilbert Lyle uses his own words to try "to explode the myth of Descartes dualism". His main method in this paper is to explain why writing a thought and a body in a language semantically similar is a logical error. Please take the first step towards direction. So, if you want to reach this hypothetical area, the following free discussion is at Lyle and his starting point, ie. The concept of Gilbert Lyle's mind The concept of Gilbert Lyle's mind (1949) is a criticism of different concepts of mind and body, a rejection of philosophical theory about different mental states and physical conditions. Lyle believes that the traditional way of thinking and body relationship (the method adopted in Descartes philosophy) assumes a fundamental difference between heart and matter. According to Ryle, this assumption is a basic 'category error'. Because it tries to analyze the relationship between "mind" and "body" as if it were a term of the same logical category. In the 1950s, in English-speaking countries the term "philosophical philosophy" became the currency. This is mainly an explanation of the discussion caused by Gilbert Lyle's pioneering work "the concept of mind" announced in 1949. Lile's work is contrary to Descartes' view that the mental state is a meaningless state. This discussion and subsequent discussion has linked the resilience of psychological events to the problem of action tendencies. The central argument of Ryle is that we misunderstand "logic" of words such as "belief", "emotion", "consciousness". He believes that the theory of traditional Cartesian psychology "misunderstood the differences in personality and uses the difference between the unforgivable psychological reasons and the visible myth of the visible physical effect" (p. 32).

They show that without reliable concrete evidence they can trust the gods. Looking at this religion, you can see that God exists. Then there are many other ancient events that happened in some era. Like the Qur'an (Muslim book), the Bible (Christian Encyclopedia) is like much of a similar event being mentioned in Tanak (Jewish book). All of these have different beliefs, even worldly rituals. Like a miracle to break the ocean of Moses, David talks with animals, Suleiman rides the wind, and Jesus sacrifices his life for death. "Does God exist?" Fortunately, Richard Dawkins wrote a new book "God's Thoughts". This is exactly the answer to this question. After all, the answer is "No, God does not exist" (Please do not deny that Dawkins reached his conclusion before the card won the World Series). Power is not enough to convince some experts. Literary critic Terry Eagleton provides an example of his idea for London Book Review. Eagleton's comments are discussed in some of my favorite blogs: 3 Quarks Daily, Pharyngula, Uncertain Principles, Valve (2), There is much debate about the existence of God about the existence of God. For a long time everyone wanted to prove the existence of God. Some people think that God exists and is proved by many philosophical or scientific foundations and religious reasons. On the other hand, others do not believe in the existence of God and their foundation is proved from many theoretical and scientific point of view. Many people try to prove the existence of God with reason. After Descartes proves its existence, he will think the truth about the essence of God, evidence of the existence of God, and the nature of material objects. The main task in Descartes' meditation is to design a system that allows him to understand the truth. He wants to lay the foundation of all further philosophy How does God exist? Does he exist? Does not he exist? These questions can be discussed in myriad theories that there are reasons why he exists, methods that do not exist, or do not exist, and there is no way to do it. Theologians argue that God exists and there is a reason to believe that God exists. On the other hand, agnostics, atheists, and followers will think that there is no reason to believe that God exists. For some people, they have no doubt about the existence of God ... the existence of God was a problem since the concept of God was imagined. Descartes tried to prove the existence of God, argued against his theory of the devil, and showed that there is no doubt that there is some external existence. He is looking for a definite certainty, the foundation on which he can base on all his beliefs and know that they are real facts. Descartes' overall project is to find a definite certainty that he can be based on all his knowledge and beliefs. Foundation

The obvious fact about the existence of God is that some people claim to have experienced God. It is these religious experiences being used by philosophers to discuss the existence of God. The main way to express discussion from P1 religious experience is as follows. Discussion that is most widely accepted and criticized about the existence of God. My purpose in this article is to explain why cosmological arguments are proof of the existence of God, to understand that it is the importance of posteriori posteriori discussion, and to my common argument It is to observe the position of. First of all, as a living person on earth, we can safely conclude that the majority of things that exist today have their cause. I confirmed that there is a reason. Before attempting to explain and evaluate the moral argument about God's existence, it is beneficial to understand the purpose of God's existential argument. Of course, though the views on this are diverse, most contemporary supporters do not believe that theoretical arguments are "proof". They should provide effective arguments and prerequisites that reasonable people can not deny. Such success criterion obviously sets high criteria for success and supporters of the argument of the writer can hardly meet philosophical discussions of interesting conclusions in areas other than formal logic such criteria Correctly point out. Is the premise of these arguments reasonable, at least for reasonable people, more reasonable than rejection? Discussion of Rene Descartes on the existence of God Rene Descartes's debate about the existence of God is related to his rationalistic deduction reasoning. Descartes concluded that the truth about the existence of God exists in His idea about the completeness of God and the essence of God (as a complete existence that must exist to be perfect). As a rationalist philosopher, Descartes truncates human knowledge as a product of our sensory data (our senses), but an epistemological sense that our knowledge can be obtained through a process of deducing our own idea I support the position. Second argument about the existence of God. Because Descartes believes the existence is perfect, it can become a predicate to God. First, I will explain what the ontological argument of the existence of God is. Next, I will explain why Descartes decided to incorporate God into his philosophical approach. As a predicate of God existence reveals some truth about God. Ontology seeks to prove the existence of God from a transcendental point of view

Knowledge can only be obtained through experience, and experiences exist only as a unit of individual thought in thinking. This knowledge theory belongs to Scottish philosopher David Hume. Hume was born April 26, 1711 and is the second son of his family. His father died when he was a baby and asked his mother to take care of his brothers and sisters. David Hume gained great success through the general curriculum and discovered early love for literature. He lives in Ninewells, a family-owned land near Edinburgh. David Hume Hume, David, 1711-76, Scottish philosopher, and historian. Hume brings empiricalism of John Rock and George Berkeley to the logical extremes of fundamental skepticism. He denied the possibility of certain kinds of knowledge and found a series of emotions in his mind and believed that the causal relationship in nature was entirely from B's introduction. The answer to the theme is drawn by the time committee named as illusion by David Hume, and the time committee named human by himself. In the era of modern philosophy, when the influence of Descartes was still important, David Hume brought the argument of killing the Descartes I created and skipping it like a ghost in human perception. You can see not only the theme but also the contrast between Hume and Descartes. Knowledge can only be obtained through experience, and experiences exist only as a unit of individual thought in thinking. This knowledge theory belongs to Scottish philosopher David Hume. Hume was born April 26, 1711 and is the second son of his family. His father died when he was a baby and asked his mother to take care of his brothers and sisters. David Hume gained great success through the general curriculum and discovered early love for literature. - Tested in various ways: The Catholic clergy of today's church by Christopher Ruddy also reflects the first article at Obleash Theological Seminary in San Antonio, Texas. The 7th Bernardine Cardinal Conference 2003 Ruddy reports on the sharing of academic and pastorian expertise and the voice of being a pastor. In addition to the report, this book opens and completes Ruddy's insight.

Empiricism (try something for yourself): All knowledge has to pass the doctrine of sensory communication; there is no natural idea that it is enough to remember (Ie Plato) All knowledge can be reduced to feelings. In other words, our concept is simply to feel the image. In short, there is no other knowledge besides knowledge gained through perceptual observation. Remember, according to Descartes, the first thing I know is my opinion. At that time, he wondered if this fictitious world would exist, so he began with his own idea and then became a reality next (not the other way). Knowledge can only be obtained through experience, and experiences exist only as a unit of individual thought in thinking. This knowledge theory belongs to Scottish philosopher David Hume. Hume was born April 26, 1711 and is the second son of his family. His father died when he was a baby and asked his mother to take care of his brothers and sisters. David Hume gained great success through the general curriculum and discovered early love for literature. - Tested in various ways: The Catholic clergy of today's church by Christopher Ruddy also reflects the first article at Obleash Theological Seminary in San Antonio, Texas. The 7th Bernardine Cardinal Conference 2003 Ruddy reports on the sharing of academic and pastorian expertise and the voice of being a pastor. In addition to the report, this book opens and completes Ruddy's insight. David Hume Hume, David, 1711-76, Scottish philosopher, and historian. Hume brings empiricalism of John Rock and George Berkeley to the logical extremes of fundamental skepticism. He denied the possibility of certain kinds of knowledge and found a series of emotions in his mind and believed that the causal relationship in nature was entirely from B's introduction. The answer to the theme is drawn by the time committee named as illusion by David Hume, and the time committee named human by himself. In the era of modern philosophy, when the influence of Descartes was still important, David Hume brought the argument of killing the Descartes I created and skipping it like a ghost in human perception. You can see not only the theme but also the contrast between Hume and Descartes. David Hume raised doubts about the world's knowledge with the option of "skeptical of understanding behavior." This problem is related to induction problems. David Hume was one of the first people to decide to analyze this problem. He begins to choose by providing a form of segmentation of human knowledge and then discusses its dependence on reasoning and experience. According to Mr. Hume, people believe that the future will be similar to the past, but there is no evidence to support this belief. In this article, we will clarify the form of knowledge and inference and verify inductive problems of Hume. This is a challenge to the explanation of legitimate faith because there is no reason for belief.

In this article I will discuss why there is evidence that there is a supernatural person called God who created everything we knew and experienced. It is only the assertion that it seems to have caused ridiculousness that there may be "proof of existence of God". However, he did not always smile and think. Do not forget that omniscient doctors / scientists ridicule every new discovery. When I first heard the illness they are said to be caused by animals, they laughed so much that you could not see them. "Does God exist?" Fortunately, Richard Dawkins wrote a new book "God's Thoughts". This is exactly the answer to this question. After all, the answer is "No, God does not exist" (Do not deny that Dawkins reached his conclusion before the card won the World Series). Power is not enough to convince some experts. Literary critic Terry Eagleton provides an example of his idea for London Book Review. Eagleton's comments are discussed in some of my favorite blogs: 3 Quarks Daily, Pharyngula, Uncertain Principles, Valve (2), There is much debate about the existence of God about the existence of God. For a long time everyone wanted to prove the existence of God. Some people think that God exists and is proved by many philosophical or scientific foundations and religious reasons. On the other hand, others do not believe in the existence of God and their foundation is proved from many theoretical and scientific point of view. Many people try to prove the existence of God with reason. After Descartes proves its existence, he will think the truth about the essence of God, evidence of the existence of God, and the nature of material objects. The main task in Descartes' meditation is to design a system that allows him to understand the truth. He wants to lay the foundation of all further philosophy How does God exist? Does he exist? Does not he exist? These questions can be discussed in myriad theories that there are reasons why he exists, methods that do not exist, or do not exist, and there is no way to do it. Theologians argue that God exists and there is a reason to believe that God exists. On the other hand, agnostics, atheists, and followers will think that there is no reason to believe that God exists. For some people, they have no doubt about the existence of God ... the existence of God was a problem since the concept of God was imagined. Descartes tried to prove the existence of God, argued against his theory of the devil, and showed that there is no doubt that there is some external existence. He is looking for a definite certainty, the foundation on which he can base on all his beliefs and know that they are real facts. Descartes' overall project is to find a definite certainty that he can be based on all his knowledge and beliefs. Foundation

In the article "God of existence", this article explains the difference between the existence and the nature of the weather, not the existence or existence of God. This argument is much more like Thomas Aquinas 'cosmological argument, and Anthem' s ontological argument. The existence of God can be separated from the essence of God, but if God exists or does not exist, the discussion will continue to be discussed. This argument clearly shows that the existence of God is exemplified by examples like mountains and valleys. There is much debate about the existence of God about the existence of God. For a long time everyone wanted to prove the existence of God. Some people think that God exists and is proved by many philosophical or scientific foundations and religious reasons. On the other hand, others do not believe in the existence of God and their foundation is proved from many theoretical and scientific point of view. Many people try to prove the existence of God with reason. After Descartes proves its existence, he will think the truth about the essence of God, evidence of the existence of God, and the nature of material objects. The main task in Descartes' meditation is to design a system that allows him to understand the truth. He wants to lay the foundation of all further philosophy The medieval society believed that humans existed because God wants them to exist. Descartes does not doubt the existence of God, I doubt that the existence of man is God's desire. He has a problem because he proved the existence of God using a series of theorems. He proved that thought is the essence of thinking. At that time the revolution supports the new idea of ​​"I think myself". It gives independent thinking and free will to human institutions, leading the age of enlightenment. For Descartes, thought proves that our existence is a conscious entity. By solving the survival problem, the thinkers of the 18th and 19th centuries established mathematical and scientific identity. Equivalent thoughts and consciousness do not satisfy thinking thoughts. Beyond the era of reason, we continue to doubt our existence

David Hume explains how you can not predict the future with a human understanding survey. Our experience and inference tells us that the object is functioning in a predictable way but we can not prove how the object is based on future previous interactions. After biting pizza we are looking forward to a pleasant taste. As our past experiences have proved this, this pleasant taste is predictable. Even though we think that the behavior of a pizza can be predicted to be the same as previous experience, it may only explode when chewing. David Hume Hume, David, 1711-76, Scottish philosopher, and historian. Hume brings empiricalism of John Rock and George Berkeley to the logical extremes of fundamental skepticism. He denied the possibility of certain kinds of knowledge and found a series of emotions in his mind and believed that the causal relationship in nature was entirely from B's introduction. The answer to the theme is drawn by the time committee named as illusion by David Hume, and the time committee named human by himself. In the era of modern philosophy, when the influence of Descartes was still important, David Hume brought the argument of killing the Descartes I created and skipping it like a ghost in human perception. You can see not only the theme but also the contrast between Hume and Descartes. David Hume raised doubts about the world's knowledge with the option of "skeptical of understanding behavior." This problem is related to induction problems. David Hume was one of the first people to decide to analyze this problem. He begins to choose by providing a form of segmentation of human knowledge and then discusses its dependence on reasoning and experience. According to Mr. Hume, people believe that the future will be similar to the past, but there is no evidence to support this belief. In this article, we will clarify the form of knowledge and inference and verify inductive problems of Hume. This is a challenge to the explanation of legitimate faith because there is no reason for belief.

In the seventh chapter of the chapter which appeared in her work "Life of the mind" for life of the soul, Arendt criticized Descartes in large part for "doubt of human recognition and sensory equipment". Descartes tries to find out the soul of myself and thought, and its reality and existence transcend the "fantasy of feeling illusion". Arendt claims that Descartes' fictional creatures are intangible and meaningless, so they can not distinguish between reality and unreality, or even know that reality is outside of itself. I like Mary O'Malley 's view of' ongoing '. A practical guide to awaken your life, she wrote as follows. The challenge of making use of it is to create a world of struggle where most people live all day long and separate them from peace and happiness. "What I wrote several years ago is:" The voice in my heart, they do not mind what I am doing, they want to discuss it completely "This is a common mistake, you think you will enter into some sort of spiritual practice.You remove the burden on man and release yourself from the human cross such as thought, jealousy, despair, etc. I will expand my mind. "- Leonard Cohen Where there is life there is thought, and the shape of the most complex soul belongs to life. Life and thinking share a core set of formal or organizational attributes, the mind's inherent formal and organizational attributes are a rich and rich version of life. More precisely, the self-organizing function of the mind is a rich version of the self-organization function of life. In a sense, what the mind needs in metaphysics also exists in biological life, but it is not necessarily the right way in the right way. The thermodynamic internal structure is organized. Therefore, not every living thing is conscious, but each brain must have biological activity. Reasonable human condition 3, deeply free and real people: metaphysical studies, section 2.4 - about expression of life

"Discovering new ideas about something is more important than finding new data and facts." To what extent do you agree with this claim? Albert Einstein said: "If humans want to survive, we need a new way of thinking." This new way of thinking needs to be based on existing knowledge. This existing knowledge is necessary because it is a catalyst for human progress and we want to discover more. Attempting to discover new knowledge does not give the same result. First of all, this book asserts that "all instructions given or accepted through discussion are derived from existing knowledge" (Book 1, Chapter 1). Therefore, Aristotle focuses on means to generate new knowledge from existing knowledge. You can call this to 'spread' knowledge through discussion. Aristotle recognizes several types of arguments. One is a mathematical demonstration. The other is "dialectic method", the third is "rhetoric". The main concern of this book is the dialectical argument. These are of two types: syllabism and induction. I briefly looked at the argument of trigonometry. They start with at least one general premise. By contrast, inductive arguments start with specific premises and lead to general conclusions. The premise of the argument consisting of three parameters is "existing" knowledge that anyone accepts from their reasoning. John Rock, a famous British philosopher of the 17th century, opposed the existing universal beliefs of congenital knowledge such as those led by such Descartes. Much of the discussion of Rock began with the recognition of philosophers' congenital knowledge, especially criticism against Descartes. Therefore, much of the discussion of rock is a direct objection to the existence of congenital knowledge of Descartes and other philosophers' beliefs. To conclude that natural knowledge is impossible, Rock brings various prerequisites and objections, in addition to his argument. Locke assumes that the mind is in a blank state or a whiteboard. Contrary to the existing Descartes philosophy, he believes that we were born without natural thought, and that knowledge can only be determined by the experience we perceive. Recent experiments with babies showed that they "pre-wired" some feelings and learning abilities. This more evidence indicates that it is natural cultivation, not natural or cultivated. This is further proof of the middle road. Newton explained the universal gravity and the laws of three movements, which dominated the scientific view of the physical universe during the next three centuries. Newton showed that the movement of the objects on the earth and the celestial body is governed by the same natural law by proveing ​​consistency between Kepler's planetary motion law and its gravity theory. revolution

... Ontology's position is "the first philosophy" - the most fundamental philosophical discipline. According to Levinas, the ontology intrinsically tries to create a whole where different things and "other" are inevitably returned to the identity and identity. According to Levinas, the desire for this whole is a basic form of expression. The contemplation of the first philosophy is representative of his idea. "First philosophy" simply means the first thing to do in philosophy. The most important point as a philosopher of Descartes is that the "first philosophy" has changed due to what he did. Aristotle became the first in philosophy since becoming metaphysical. Therefore, the first question the philosophy has to answer is the truth. That is decided, we can do all the other things. Through this arrangement, we can say that philosophy cooperates with the priority of ontology. In meditation, I understood that the problem of knowledge stands out. If there are problems with the problems we know, we may not even know what is true. However, if knowledge issues have to be resolved first, this establishes philosophical epistemological priorities. In fact, this led to the emergence of epistemology and epistemology, which was the first time as an independent field of philosophy. Experienceism is experience René Descartes, often referred to as the father of modern philosophy, suggests that philosophy should start with a fundamental suspicion about the possibility of obtaining reliable knowledge. In 1641, in the meditation of the first philosophy, he attempted to determine something with the most certain knowledge using this suspicious method. He chose Cogito ergo sum ("I think so, so I am") of a famous statement as the basis of his philosophy. Then he tried to rebuild the body of knowledge based on what he was thought to be without doubt. This includes proving the existence of God, using other methods, using the form of ontological argument). Descartes' method is called rationalism and fascinates philosophers like Baruch Spinoza, Gottfried Leibniz, Christian Wolff.

Discussion about the existence of God is one of the best pursuits of human thought, in the world, beyond the real or special experience field. There is no doubt that God's problem is one of the most important problems in human philosophy. If a human being is the highest existence in the universe, or if a man has a bigger presence, he must love it, oblige it, or ignore it, it will be challenged . So the problem is whether God exists. There is much debate about the existence of God about the existence of God. For a long time everyone wanted to prove the existence of God. Some people think that God exists and is proved by many philosophical or scientific foundations and religious reasons. On the other hand, others do not believe in the existence of God, and their foundation is proved from many theoretical and scientific point of view. Many people try to prove the existence of God with reason. After Descartes proves its existence, people will consider the truth about the essence of God, evidence of the existence of God, and the nature of material objects. The main task in Descartes' meditation is to design a system that allows him to understand the truth. He wants to lay the foundation of all further philosophy Second argument about the existence of God. Because Descartes believes the existence is perfect, it can become a predicate to God. First, I will explain what the ontological argument of the existence of God is. Next, I will explain why Descartes decided to incorporate God into his philosophical approach. As a predicate of God existence reveals some truth about God. Ontology seeks to prove the existence of God from a transcendental point of view

The existence of God's work has been quoted for centuries and the concept of God has always been part of the history of mankind. There is always a different integration between the past and the present, including the believers and the unbelievers of God. People who have confidence in God are often associated with one religion or other religion. Skeptics, on the other hand, I think that the existence of God is a little confused and I am trying to find answers in a scientific way. Even today, with all the development of modern technology and science, there is no clear answer to the question "Does God exist?" Many philosophers and scholars trying to answer this question are going to do this. There is much debate about the existence of God about the existence of God. For a long time everyone wanted to prove the existence of God. Some people think that God exists and is proved by many philosophical or scientific foundations and religious reasons. On the other hand, others do not believe in the existence of God and their foundation is proved from many theoretical and scientific point of view. Many people try to prove the existence of God with reason. After Descartes proves its existence, he will think the truth about the essence of God, evidence of the existence of God, and the nature of material objects. The main task in Descartes' meditation is to design a system that allows him to understand the truth. He wants to lay the foundation of all further philosophy The medieval society believed that humans existed because God wants them to exist. Descartes does not doubt the existence of God, I doubt that the existence of man is God's desire. He has a problem because he proved the existence of God using a series of theorems. He proved that thought is the essence of thinking. At that time the revolution supports the new idea of ​​"I think myself". It gives independent thinking and free will to human institutions, leading the age of enlightenment. For Descartes, thought proves that our existence is a conscious entity. By solving the survival problem, the thinkers of the 18th and 19th centuries established mathematical and scientific identity. Equivalent thoughts and consciousness do not satisfy thinking thoughts. Beyond the era of reason, we continue to doubt our existence

This paper critically examines Hume's assertion on knowledge / existence of substantial ideas. This denial is rooted in his epistemology, which is based on the theory that complicated thinking lacking a corresponding impression is created by three relations, imagination, memory, and impression, three relationships, similarity, continuity, and a constant connection includes. The key to my criticism is to point out that these relationships are such that only unified agents over the long term can interact with them in a way to explain them in a hurry. David Hume Hume, David, 1711-76, Scottish philosopher, and historian. Hume brings empiricalism of John Rock and George Berkeley to the logical extremes of fundamental skepticism. He denied the possibility of certain kinds of knowledge and found a series of emotions in his mind and believed that the causal relationship in nature was entirely from B's introduction. The answer to the theme is drawn by the time committee named as illusion by David Hume, and the time committee named human by himself. In the era of modern philosophy, when the influence of Descartes was still important, David Hume brought the argument of killing the Descartes I created and skipping it like a ghost in human perception. You can see not only the theme but also the contrast between Hume and Descartes. Our recognition and memory The famous philosophers David Hume and Rene Descartes are those who are looking for answers and definitions of individual identity. Both of them considered their ideas and issued two different conclusions. Some people think that individual identity can not be understood, but others confirm that their certainty is their thinking and cognitive ability. David Hume begins discussing personal identity by denying this David Hume is studying physical and mental problems. Hume also investigated the person's character, the relationship between humans and animals, and the nature of the agent. Hume pointed out that we tend to think we are the same person five years ago. We have changed in various ways, but the same person appears there. You can start thinking about which functions can be changed without changing the fundamental self. However, Hume denies that there are differences between the various features of people and the magical self that is said to have these characteristics. "In addition to specific awareness, we will never pay close attention to anything - human beings are turning at incredible speed, a bunch or collection of different cognitions in constant flow and movement "

The following paper provides a theoretical basis for supporting the existence of God. By proving that the world of atheists can not explain the prerequisites of the laws of logic, atheists can not even explain reasonable arguments about the existence of God. "Opposed impossibility" is the best and only evidence of the necessary truth of the existence of God, enabling God's revelation to us to use logic to us. This can be transformed into the following form using only the required truth. L: (the law of logic) G: (if God exists) if L requires GL ============== G logic is "based on God" rule of reasoning " Discussion of Rene Descartes on the existence of God Rene Descartes's debate about the existence of God is related to his rationalistic deduction reasoning. Descartes concluded that the truth about the existence of God exists in His idea about the completeness of God and the essence of God (as a complete existence that must exist to be perfect). As a rationalist philosopher, Descartes truncates human knowledge as a product of our sensory data (our senses), but an epistemological sense that our knowledge can be obtained through a process of deducing our own idea I support the position. Second argument about the existence of God. Because Descartes believes the existence is perfect, it can become a predicate to God. First, I will explain what the ontological argument of the existence of God is. Next, I will explain why Descartes decided to incorporate God into his philosophical approach. As a predicate of God existence reveals some truth about God. Ontology seeks to prove the existence of God from a transcendental point of view One of the most important attempts to prove the existence of God in the general debate of the existence of God is the ontological argument of St. Anselm theologian of the 11th century. The view of Anselm is that God is defined as the greatest existence that must be imagined and must exist, as absent entities lack the fact that they lack its great attributes. But critics wonder if their existence really contributes

It is stone, tree, spring, cobblestone, wood chips, house and so on. In other words, anything that can affect the results of human life. Religion seems to be outdated and even harmful to individuals and societies (hindering or hindering scientific progress), in fact religion, your religion (your faith) is your inner emotion and reality It is a spiritual difference of the world. When the religion begins, I repeat, when people get their qualitative self in the natural environment through subjective consciousness of objective facts through their own intellectual consciousness, Discussion of Rene Descartes on the existence of God Rene Descartes's debate about the existence of God is related to his rationalistic deduction reasoning. Descartes concluded that the truth about the existence of God exists in His idea about the completeness of God and the essence of God (as a complete existence that must exist to be perfect). - All moral arguments about the existence of God are based on the principle that all of us share common sense of morality. Despite cultural differences, in a broad sense, people all over the world have ambiguous thoughts about right and wrong; a moral argument to the existence of God is that this mutual understanding is evidence of the existence of God I will say that. Immanuel Kant advocated this argument (not a moral argument); a god as a source of objective morality Before attempting to explain and evaluate the moral argument about God's existence, it is beneficial to understand the purpose of God's existential argument. Of course, though the views on this are diverse, most contemporary supporters do not believe that theoretical arguments are "proof". They should provide effective arguments and prerequisites that reasonable people can not deny. Such success criterion obviously sets high criteria for success and supporters of the argument of the writer can hardly meet philosophical discussions of interesting conclusions in areas other than formal logic such criteria Correctly point out. Is the premise of these arguments reasonable, at least for reasonable people, more reasonable than rejection? There is much debate about the existence of God about the existence of God. For a long time everyone wanted to prove the existence of God. Some people think that God exists and is proved by many philosophical or scientific foundations and religious reasons. On the other hand, others do not believe in the existence of God and their foundation is proved from many theoretical and scientific point of view. Many people try to prove the existence of God with reason. After Descartes proves its existence, he will think the truth about the essence of God, evidence of the existence of God, and the nature of material objects. The main task in Descartes' meditation is to design a system that allows him to understand the truth. He wants to lay the foundation of all further philosophy

Locke, Berkeley, Hume's Enlightenment began with unmatched confidence for human reasons. The success of the new science through the elimination of the natural world of Locke, Berkeley, Hume influenced philosophical efforts in two ways. The first is to place the foundation of human knowledge in the human mind and put it in encounter with the physical world. The second is to direct the attention of philosophy to an analysis of the mind that can achieve cognitive success. John Rock set a tone of enlightenment by affirming the basic principle of empiricism: nothing in intelligence was in the past. Empiricism, a belief in the realization of knowledge through sensation, is the universal belief of several great contemporary philosophers. Perhaps the most famous empiricists are John Locke, George Berkeley and David Hume who are considered to be one of the most influential philosophers in the past 500 years. Due to the importance of experience in philosophical principles, each philosopher can be regarded as an experientist. More specifically, the empirical perspective of rock can be seen from his view on the primary and secondary nature of objects. David Hume Hume, David, 1711-76, Scottish philosopher, and historian. Hume brings empiricalism of John Rock and George Berkeley to the logical extremes of fundamental skepticism. He denied the possibility of certain kinds of knowledge and found a series of emotions in his mind and believed that the causal relationship in nature was entirely from B's introduction. The answer to the theme is drawn by the time committee named as illusion by David Hume, and the time committee named human by himself. In the era of modern philosophy, when the influence of Descartes was still important, David Hume brought the argument of killing the Descartes I created and skipping it like a ghost in human perception. You can see not only the theme but also the contrast between Hume and Descartes. Among the important philosophers related to empiricism are Aristotle, Thomas Aquinas, Francis Bacon, Thomas Hobbes, John Rock, George Berkeley, David Hume, and John Stuart Mill. Recently, positivists such as Mach, Vienna Circle, logical positivists, and most followers of analysis philosophy are empiricists. The central concept of scientific and scientific methods is that all evidence must be based on observable evidence by sensory or sensory extension empirically or empirically. It is distinguished from philosophical usage of empirical philosophy by using adjective "experience" or adverb "experience". Experience refers to the use of working assumptions used in combination with natural science and social science and can be tested or experimentally tested. In this sense, the scientific statement is the subject of our experience and observation and is derived from them.

Description of journal information: Extended beyond postmodern, boundary 2 deals with literary and cultural issues in terms of political, historical and theoretical knowledge. Boundary 2 continues to promise to understand current and nearly cultural and political (domestic and international) studies through literature, philosophy, and human science. "Mobile Wall" represents the period between the latest issue available in JSTOR and the latest journal. The moving wall is usually expressed in terms of age. In rare cases, since the issuer selected the "zero" mobile wall, the current problem will be made public on JSTOR as soon as it is issued. For example, if the current year is 2008 and the journal has a 5 year moving frame, you can get the 2002 article. Francis Bacon (1561-1626) was one of the key figures in the field of natural philosophy and scientific methodology from the Renaissance to the early modern era. As a lawyer, parliamentarian and Queen lawyer, Bacon asked questions about law, nation and religion, and modern politics, but he also notes that even his book on nature guesses sentences that he thought about possible social concepts Announced. Thinking about the moral problem in progression work (prose)). Francis Bacon (1561 - 1626) is a British scientist and lawyer. Bacon is a tool of Renaissance and scientific enlightenment. In particular, Bacon has developed and promoted scientific approaches based on well-organized scientific approaches to demonstrate evidence, results, and new scientific rigor. He is widely regarded as the father of empiricism and the scientific revolution of the Renaissance. Bacon was born on January 22, 1561, near the strand of London in the UK. At the age of 12 he entered Cambridge's Trinity College where he traced the traditional medieval course, mostly in Latin. He praised Aristotle, but he criticized Aristotle's philosophical approach (he called "useless") and academic tradition, which undoubtedly makes a past assumption about classical teachers like Asia Accepted. Richmond and Plato Francis Bacon (1561 - 1626) British philosopher, politician, speaker and scientist. Bacon is considered "father of empiricism" because it is working on scientific phenomena research, systematization of scientific methodology, and structured scientific inquiry. He encourages his own example and philosophical experience. An important figure in the scientific revolution of the 17th century. Rene de Carte (1596 - 1650) Rene de Carte is a French philosopher and mathematician. Descartes made a great contribution to the philosophy of rationalism. Descartes' meditation is epoch-making. Because he suspects previous beliefs and is trying to prove their validity through logic. Later empiricists opposed Descartes' method, but his philosophy opened up many topics for further discussion. Descartes has been proved to be "the existence of God", but his doubt is an important step in promoting reasons over faith.

The importance of philosophy in the modern world Many of the philosophers we read in class are desperate for me (some of them express helpful ideas and provide good ideas). Of course it is easy to write only when people live and philosophy has to rely on historical conditions and the range of human knowledge. Many philosophers who have existed for centuries must worry about opposition, censorship or punishment by the government, the church or society. Summary of Skepticism and Philosophy of Language in Early Modern Thought: This paper discusses the importance of skeptical discussion of language philosophy in early modern thought. It compares the concept of language and knowledge of rationalists with the concept of philosophers taking a skeptical position. Criticism of rationalists' action against natural light ... In "skepticism of skepticism's argument" and "skepticism of opposition", "Jonathan Vogel established the best explanation" reasoning (hereinafter referred to as "IBE") Serve as a means of denying doubts about the outside world. In this refutation, Mr. Vogel acknowledges that the question about IBE still exists, but this doubt is negligible because it is quite eccentric in nature. Discussion of the method is one of the most influential work in the history of modern philosophy and is very important for the development of natural science. In this work, Descartes solved the problem of skepticism studied previously by Sextus Empiricus, Al-Ghazali and Michel de Montaigne. Descartes fixed it to show that he found an undisputable truth. Descartes started his reasoning from evaluating the world from a new perspective and doubting everything to eliminate prejudice.

Hume's mental game Human thought is a very complex machine. There have been a lot of attempts to explain how human thinking works, but it has not been successful. After reading Hume I agree with many of the things he explained. In my opinion, Hume is the closest thing to exposing thought. Robert Hume handled much of what Decarte spoke of in his work. The difference between Decarte and Hume is that Hume "resolves" many of the "wrinkles" left by Decarte. David Hume Hume, David, 1711-76, Scottish philosopher, and historian. Hume brings empiricalism of John Rock and George Berkeley to the logical extremes of fundamental skepticism. He denied the possibility of certain kinds of knowledge and found a series of emotions in his mind and believed that the causal relationship in nature was entirely from B's introduction. The answer to the theme is drawn by the time committee named as illusion by David Hume, and the time committee named human by himself. In the era of modern philosophy, when the influence of Descartes was still important, David Hume brought the argument of killing the Descartes I created and skipping it like a ghost in human perception. You can see not only the theme but also the contrast between Hume and Descartes. Our recognition and memory The famous philosophers David Hume and Rene Descartes are those who are looking for answers and definitions of individual identity. Both of them considered their ideas and issued two different conclusions. Some people think that individual identity can not be understood, but others confirm that their certainty is their thinking and cognitive ability. David Hume begins discussing personal identity by denying this

Through human existence, scholars seriously pursue knowledge and realize the truth. Historical figures such as Plato, Descartes and Emerson seek answers to the difficult questions "What Is Truth", "What is Reality", "How Wisdom Has Been Obtained" It is. Inconsistent view: Plato doubts all historical, cultural and personal views of the past, Descartes doubt the definition of reality and its existence, Emerson to confidence and his ideals, opinions, beliefs We encourage confidence in you. Considering that students often think that it is difficult for Emerson's style and implications, Emerson cares about his audience and colleagues, not as a writer who builds himself, but a unified philosophy or movement (eg , Transcendence) supporters. As an American scholar / poet / prophet. For example, this may call for attention to certain definitions or categories Emerson faces, such as "literature" and "poetic" content, allowing scholars "learn" content, etc). It will lead people to see how Emerson explains his audience or masses, how to solve their difficulties and expectations, and how he represents his "era". In this context, Emerson's journal works are very useful; students can see the writers present their own expressions, reflect and reflect. Impact of Ralph Waldo Emerson's transcendental philosophy and Margaret Fuller's feminist philosophy Ralph Waldo Emerson is the main thinker of the first American transcendent movement. Many of the most influential views on the movement between human thought and the world are advocated. - If possible live as much as possible and laugh when laughing like laugh like hell, gentle and angry when angry. Please be alive. You will soon die. - William Saroyan Although this attitude towards this lifestyle may be humorous and simple, William Salo Yang explains all the needs of people living together and experiences life altogether. "Calpe diem" is a phrase that is not familiar to Latin scholars only

The views expressed by Michel Montaigne's "self-feeding" nature and technology in Michel Montaigne's "cannibalism" are still very effective in today's society. As you say, "the more you have, the more you desire", technology makes life easier. We are a fast-paced society and we are not thinking much about the world around us. Not only did we not notice the beauty of nature, we started to destroy nature without thinking. I live in a society that does not pay much attention to natural and wonderful works. Michel de Montaigne's article "Cannibals", Michel de Montaigne said: "According to our criteria, this is truly barbarian, as they describe the Brazilians in the article" Cannibals "in the 1580 article I have to do this completely or we have to do so There is a remarkable distance between their roles and our character "(158). - Descartes' free will to think the first philosophy In my first philosophical thinking, Descartes led the reader to practice methodology in philosophical exploration. After robbing all the wisdom of doubt and false beliefs, he reexamined the nature and structure of existence and tried to universally obtain a valid epistemology without skepticism. A cannibal is an article that is one of the collections of essays collected by Michel de Montaigne, describing the ritual of Pininaba in Brazil. In particular, he reported how the organization respected and eaten the enemy 's dead bodies. In his work, he uses cultural relativism to compare European "savage" of the 16th century with cannibalism. Michelle Echem de Montagne, commonly known as Michel de Montagne, was born on February 28, 1533 in Montagne Castle (near Bordeaux, France). Montagne 's wealthy father, Pierre Ekemed Montagne decided to cultivate his son' s intellectual development with Latin as the first language. Montagne did not learn French until 6 years old. His father's death also meant that Montagne inherited family estate. In 1571, Montagne retreated to his castle and protected himself from public daily life. He also began writing personal and subjective thinking about topics such as religion, education, friendship, love, and freedom. Montagne called his original work Essa. He developed a new literary genre: articles

Difference in mind and body Some people choose to insist that everyone is body and mind. Both are united to death, the soul does not continue to exist, the body has no life. People live in the history of two mortgages. One relates to what happens to the body and the body, and the other occurs in the mind. What happens in the body is open, what happens in your mind is private. Events that respond to the body consist of a physical world, spiritual events are composed of a psychological world. Many philosophers try to explain the difference between body and mind. They are trying to explain how the body affects the mind, how the mind influences the body, and whether the bodies can exist with each other. The reason is to inspire people to try to replace the beliefs of religious reasoning with evidence of scientific facts and reasoning. - Many celebrities seem to be experiencing poor childhood. Jack London is a very difficult childhood, full of poverty and uncertainty, but he is one of the most famous authors of the 20th century. The lack of stability in living in London and the stages he experienced as sailors, playing cards, Klondike Argona, and self-made millionaires are all pages of his writing. Psychological history of many psychology in the mind and body includes attempts to solve physical and mental problems and how they interact. Thanks to the influential work of René Descartes written around 1630, the philosophical distinction between the body and the mind can be traced back to the Greeks, but first the systematic explanation of the relationship between the body and the mind You should. When he is a friend of Descartes and frequently journalist Marin Mersenne wrote him Galileo ... Language is one of the most powerful media in the human world, not only through languages ​​but also through visuals and media. Music to express words. Language is the silence between spoken words and phrases and the next phrase. In our culture we are trying to mark objects as monochrome. It is either or this, but when something is missing from the language, we try to assign a color to it rather than making them real. I have two people.

Descartes believes that only unquestionable propositions can be regarded as knowledge. Do you agree? Do we know that something has no doubt? Description What is the reason why locks refuse to accept the concept of innate concepts? According to Locke, what is the difference between primary quality and secondary quality? Why is Hume skeptical about metaphysical problems? Why is the principle of induction not being justified or being justified first? If the principle of induction can not be proved, does it mean that we can not believe the discovery of science? why? As Descartes said, do you think that we can understand some of the facts of the world without feeling? why? Do you think John Rock's theory is more reasonable than the theory of Descartes? Description Below is a series of learning guidance questions to help prepare the examination papers. When considering possible answers to these questions, pay particular attention to creating clear, interesting, and debatable paper sentences. For more information on paper presentation and some examples, see Writing job recruitment. 1. How do various anthropologists define cultural concepts? What are the pros and cons of each definition? How should anthropologists in the 21st century define and study culture? Discuss the following three tasks: Marinovski / Rappa Port, Mead, Farmer, Gates, Steedley / Abrugo, Wilk / Watson, Ravinov It is useful to consider the statement of the paper as an answer by the author to the question of the paper. Please compare the paper presentation on page 5 of paper paper problem. The paper statement provides a basic answer to the question, and the remainder of this article will support this answer in more detail. One of the growing trends in the world against this lifestyle is the "Low Life" campaign. It is trying to regain a simpler and more balanced lifestyle based on the tradition of food and diet. With the slow life campaign, more and more people are eating more healthy foods, they prefer local imported foods, and the demand for organic cultivated crops and natural cultivated crops is increasing. For each of the following questions, please judge whether it matches the definitions of valid questions. If the paper question matches the definition, "Yes", if it does not match the definition, mark it "No". If the problem does not match the definition of a valid essay question, please rebuild the question to be consistent and fill in the answer in the space below the original question. Use the answer in Appendix A (page 42) to check your answer. What are the main advantages and limitations of the sample? Paper question? Example B Given its strengths and weaknesses, should paper questions be used to evaluate students' ability to create solutions to problems? In answering this question, please briefly explain the main advantages and limitations of this paper. Explain clearly whether or not you think you should use the question of the paper and explain the reason for the judgment

Rene de Carte is a philosopher who introduced a popular philosophical approach called "extreme suspicion" in his book "First thought on philosophy". Mr. Descartes suggests "to give up the possibly suspected belief" (as it may be wrong). In 'Sparkling' supervised by Shutter Island and Stanley Kubrick of Martin Scorsese, the audience was introduced to those who suspected the reality like Descartes, and with the depth of madness. I got drowned. Fear, paranoia and doubt are the main factors making these two movies psychological myths, which constantly tease the brain at every turning point. Shutter Island is isolated from society like a shining spirit. As Jack was trapped in the hotel due to a snowstorm, Teddy Daniels discovered being trapped in the island in a hurricane. Both Shutter Island and The Shining are deployed mainly in the untrusted heroes. The audience was introduced to "hero", then slowly became crazy. Isolation and insanity stand out in each scene of the two movies. And it makes ordinary and caring father a murderer of madness and psychosis, ending both of them. Shutter Island is a thriller based on a novel written by Dennis Lehane. The story took place in the 1960s on a Shos island where a mental hospital called Ashecliff was used to imprison the most horrible criminal madman. Two policemen went to the island to investigate the missing prisoners in Word B. This movie focuses on the moral value of the perspective of various people. This movie is full of suspense shots and conversations. The audience may think that two police officers are trapped in the island, but the director has created more traces for the police. Shutter Island is a new American black psychological thriller of 2010, conducted by Martin Scorsese and created by Laeta Kalogridis. Leonardo DiCaprio plays American Marshal Edward "Teddy" Daniels. Mark Ruffalo plays his partner, Ben Kingsley is the main psychiatrist at the institution, Michelle Williams is Daniels' wife. This film was released on February 19, 2010, widely praised by critics, the national box office revenue exceeded 294 million dollars and was selected by the National Review Committee as one of the top ten films in 2010 It was.

Does God exist? From the beginning, men have tried to answer this question. Who is responsible for creating life and the universe? It seems natural to conclude that there must be more power to produce what is known to people. But how to prove the existence of such a god. This is the main focus of theologians and philosophers who started hundreds of years ago of Jesus Christ, and since then has been a violent argument. "Does God exist?" Fortunately, Richard Dawkins wrote a new book "God's Thoughts". This is exactly the answer to this question. After all, the answer is "No, God does not exist" (Do not deny that Dawkins reached his conclusion before the card won the World Series). Power is not enough to convince some experts. Literary critic Terry Eagleton provides an example of his idea for London Book Review. Eagleton's comments are discussed in some of my favorite blogs: 3 Quarks Daily, Pharyngula, Uncertain Principles, Valve (2), There is much debate about the existence of God about the existence of God. For a long time everyone wanted to prove the existence of God. Some people think that God exists and is proved by many philosophical or scientific foundations and religious reasons. On the other hand, others do not believe in the existence of God and their foundation is proved from many theoretical and scientific point of view. Many people try to prove the existence of God with reason. After Descartes proves its existence, he will think the truth about the essence of God, evidence of the existence of God, and the nature of material objects. The main task in Descartes' meditation is to design a system that allows him to understand the truth. He wants to lay the foundation of all further philosophy

According to Lakoff's embedded cognitive theory embodiment, the interaction between the body and its environment has a significant influence on the initial formation of metaphor. Gallese & Lakoff (2005) argues that conceptual knowledge is embodied - it is mapped to our senses - motor system (p. 456). They believed that their understanding is based on the discovery and use of a shared neural matrix, so understanding also has the root of the neural matrix. They detailed the interaction theory based on the realization of understanding. It is understood that "It was built through our constant encounter and the interaction with the world through our body". Experience recognition is the theory that cognition is the interaction between the body and the mind. The concept of materializing recognition is coming from the field of philosophy, and in contrast to existing ideas advocated by Descartes. Descartes believes in duality of the mind and body and proposes a dichotomy. In other words, since the mind is a tool of superior thinking, it can be more reliable in deducing reality from life experiences that the body is easy to encounter. Philosophers and psychologists oppose this position and suggest that our physical interactions provide information for our cognitive patterns and are therefore not completely different but interdependent It is a manifestation of recognition that is closely related to the concrete and concrete fields of interaction. As mentioned above, David Kirsch is deeply involved in the development of DanceRail and is deeply rooted in the specific cognitive (EC) field. Experience recognition was integrated in the early 1990s, and a clear response to the standard cognitive paradigm at that time was born. By understanding the special position of the body it is possible to find recognition in the corners of Merlot-Ponty and Dewey, not Cartesian division between the mind and body, internal expression and the outside world. There are several variants of EC, such as distributed cognition and formulation (Dijk, 2012).

Coincidence of Malebranche: Philosophical summary of the Garden of Eden: According to Malebranche, Adam should be considered a coincidence philosopher. Philosophy not only derives from heaven, it was actually derived from the occultism of Malebranche. This is to be able to adhere to his contingent belief that Adam was given the special ability to his body, the ability to separate the main part of the brain (position of the soul) from others. Body In the history of philosophy there are at least two answers to this question. Nicholas Malebranche invented an unexpected situation, which is why God is alone in all events. Therefore, God 's involvement allows past events to cause future events. Therefore, past and future events are related as God makes it show this way. However, the unexpected situation has been criticized by the poor God's achievement and its power. In contrast, Gottfried Leibniz devised a pre-established harmony theory to explain the progress of events in the world. God is again the only reason for all events, but God has only one intervention to determine the course of all future events. The pre-established harmony theory is similar to the situation someone arranges thousands of Domino in some way. Until the emergence of humanism in the Renaissance, medieval philosophy was dominated by academicism. Modern philosophy began in France in the 17th century and its philosophy was Rene de Carte, Blaze Pascal and Nicolas Marebranche. Descartes revived the Western philosophy, which was rejected after the Greek and Roman era. His idea about the first philosophy changed the main purpose of philosophical thought and raised some basic questions for foreigners such as Spinoza, Leibniz, Hume, Berkeley and Kant. Many philosophers still stand out from the classical tradition and regard their philosophy as a way of life. The most noteworthy of these are René Descartes, Baruch Spinoza, Nicolas Malebranche and Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. With the rise of the university, the concept of modern philosophy became more prominent. Many respected philosophers since the 18th century have participated in university, teaching and developing their work. Early examples include Immanuel Kant, Johann Gottlieb Fichte, Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph Schelling, and Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel.

This is the beginning of humans. The Bible tells you the whole story. Most people say that the Bible is merely a book of stories. The Bible is far beyond this. I understand why they discuss this. But God did not show it. He sacrificed his life for us. Regardless of whether you see it or not, he is always with us. The secret of faith is to have confidence. The church, the commandments, the Bible, and the heaven we have are all true. There is much debate about the existence of God about the existence of God. For a long time everyone wanted to prove the existence of God. Some people think that God exists and is proved by many philosophical or scientific foundations and religious reasons. On the other hand, others do not believe in the existence of God, and their foundation is proved from many theoretical and scientific point of view. Many people try to prove the existence of God with reason. After Descartes proves its existence, people will consider the truth about the essence of God, evidence of the existence of God, and the nature of material objects. The main task in Descartes' meditation is to design a system that allows him to understand the truth. He wants to lay the foundation of all further philosophy The medieval society believed that humans existed because God wants them to exist. Descartes does not doubt the existence of God, I doubt that the existence of man is God's desire. He has a problem because he proved the existence of God using a series of theorems. He proved that thought is the essence of thinking. At that time the revolution supports the new idea of ​​"I think myself". It gives independent thinking and free will to human institutions, leading the age of enlightenment. For Descartes, thought proves that our existence is a conscious entity. By solving the survival problem, the thinkers of the 18th and 19th centuries established mathematical and scientific identity. Equivalent thoughts and consciousness do not satisfy thinking thoughts. Beyond the era of reason, we continue to doubt our existence In his first comment on "sentence", John Duns Scotts wrote this idea? Is it known that there is an infinite existence like the existence of God? In this work, he prove that God exists through the similarity between the truth and its existence. It is well known that God Burant 3 exists because he proved that the truth is known and that God is the truth. What? We can not deny what is known per se. (Fairweather, p. 429) John Duns Scotus presented a number of persuasive arguments to his comment, which uses his logic and theory to prove that an infinite exist exists I believed in.

There is much debate about the existence of God about the existence of God. For a long time everyone wanted to prove the existence of God. Some people think that God exists and is proved by many philosophical or scientific foundations and religious reasons. On the other hand, others do not believe in the existence of God and their foundation is proved from many theoretical and scientific point of view. Many people try to prove the existence of God through rational argument. The Western tradition of the philosophical debate about the existence of God began with Plato and Aristotle, and those arguments are now classified as cosmology. St. Anselm presented other arguments about the existence of God and he proposed the first ontological argument; Ibn Rushed (Averus) and Thomas Aquinas each had their own cosmological argument (with Karam discussion and First Way); RenéDescartes once said that the existence of a merciful God is logically necessary, because the evidence of sensation is meaningful. John Calvin advocates a spirit of sensation that allows everyone to understand the existence of God. There is much debate about the existence of God about the existence of God. For a long time everyone wanted to prove the existence of God. Some people think that God exists and is proved by many philosophical or scientific foundations and religious reasons. On the other hand, others do not believe in the existence of God and their foundation is proved from many theoretical and scientific point of view. Many people try to prove the existence of God with reason. After Descartes proves its existence, he will think the truth about the essence of God, evidence of the existence of God, and the nature of material objects. The main task in Descartes' meditation is to design a system that allows him to understand the truth. He wants to lay the foundation of all further philosophy Second argument about the existence of God. Because Descartes believes that existence is perfect, it can become a predicate to God. First, I will explain what the ontological argument of the existence of God is. Next, I will explain why Descartes decided to incorporate God into his philosophical approach. As a predicate of God existence reveals some truth about God. Ontology seeks to prove the existence of God from a transcendental point of view

Critical criticism of Ann Conway 's Descartes Dualism: Explain and analyze criticism of Anne Conway' s descartes dualism. After a brief biography of Conway, I portrayed some of the influence on her philosophy. Then I mentioned non-importance from her non-Cartesian point of view. According to Conway, there is only one substance in the reality of creation. This substance includes substance and spirit. She believes that pure substances and spiritual substances are impossible. Next, I will discuss several discussions of Conway on Descartes dualism. Conway criticized Descartes' dualism with a total of six arguments, but the latter is better known for the convertibility of matter and spirit. According to Conway, things and spirits are not two completely opposite entities; they are only substances that can be exchanged. Changes in material survival and spiritual survival, and vice versa. Since dualism denies the possibility of conversion, these modules of thinking and spirit not only give her theory, but also oppose the concept of dualism. Since the discussion of Conway is widely complicated, we explain only the argument contrasting with the concept of dualism. Material dualism (or Descartes dualism) believes that the mind is an independent matter - the mind does not spread out into space and matter can not be thought. This is the most famous type of dualism of Descartes, it is compatible with most theologians who claim that the immortal soul occupies an independent "existence region" different from the material world. Attribute dualism (also called token physics) argues that thought is a series of independent attributes that emerge from the brain, but that is not a unique substance. Thus, if the substance is organized in an appropriate way (ie in the form of a living human tissue), psychological features will appear.

Many philosophers are proving how knowledge human beings have and knowledge. Kant, Rock, and Descartes took different positions and piloted points. For example, Descartes believes certainty comes from human reason, but Locke believes that all certainty comes from human experience. Kant combines these two theories and points out that both rationality and experience are necessary for certainty. All three arguments are valid, but I personally think that Kant's view is the strongest. Both Rock and Descartes' discussions are going down a little. Most epistemological theories are not purely reasonable as Descartes. In addition, although the influence of Kant is enormous, contemporary theorists do not accept the concept of synthesizing prior knowledge based on Kant's transcendental idealism. Nevertheless, many epistemologists believe that naturalistic resources can not cope with skepticism and fundamental problems of the nature of cognitive defense well. Or they believe they can cope only through questions like these resources appealing. On the other hand, Naturalists argue that there is nothing in transcendental epistemology. Unless epistemology is entirely based on the practice of scientific exploration and the results obtained thereby, it is totally different from evidence and strategy which is the only evidence that can be proved or confirmed eventually. There are few that Kant can break the position as one of the most influential moral theorists of the present age. But Kant took a break and started racist anthropology. Kant accepted the appearance of multiple bodies. Kant argues that in a hierarchical order of human kind, only white people can get voluntary and complete moral and rational ability - a real person -. Kant's moral equality principle applies only to Caucasians, so there is a quantitative limit. His excellence has deeply rooted these ideas into the classification of mankind until the 20th century. (Kant 's racist racism is now abnormal as it attracts some academic attention.)

Because reality is in my mind, my reality theory seems to be consistent with Berkeley. Reality is not important and exists only in the hearts of us and others. In reality there is neither right nor bad. The truth is proved by various examples and concepts. You can think of it as reality by seeing what everyone wants from a certain experience. The existence of Berkeley people does not depend entirely on seeing it. Berkeley's central argument is that wise objects can not exist without being noticed, but he does not think that individuals are the only perceptors. Formal reality - formal reality is only an existing reality. This is the diversity of the garden, normal reality. Formal reality has three levels: limited, infinite, and mode. Only God has infinite reality. Every problem has limited reality. All qualities have modal reality. The concept of formal reality is extremely important for the causal discussion of Descartes for the existence of God. See also objective reality. Natural thoughts - Natural thoughts are ideas that exist in your mind when you are born. Descartes says that in our heads, eternal truths such as mathematical ideas such as geometric shapes, metaphysical ideas such as God and essential ideas, facts that can not be obtained from the truth I believe that is born. . These congenital ideas play a central role in his knowledge theory. Regarding what represents an idea, Descartes refers to the objective reality of the idea. The objective reality of things is the reality of things. Because it is an expression of something (ibid). Considering that the concept of the sun and the concept of Pegasus represent elements of thinking (they show whether they represent the sun and Pegasus, respectively), everyone has an objective reality. Descartes said these ideas are inherently objective. Equally important, I think that it is the only project with official and objective reality in his ontology. (AT VII 42; CSM II 29) Formal reality is totally in contrast to "objective reality", reality and existence depends on what it represents. Since all ideas are patterns of mind, they all have the same degree of formal reality. However, as they can express ______________, there are differences in objective reality. Besides ideas, what is the objective reality? I will now close my eyes, stop my ears, remove my sense from their subjects, even remove all important image images from my consciousness, or at least it is difficult to achieve I think they are empty, just talking to myself and carefully examining my nature, I will try to get more intimate and familiar self-knowledge

The dilemma of the existence of God has plagued humanity for thousands of years. Many philosophers have proposed their theory to prove the existence of God. Most of these arguments can be called ontologies. These arguments are different from the discussion about the existence of other gods. Because they are not based on empirical data such as the existence and essence of the universe, they are based on pure logic. First, we consider the discussion made by Anselm. He believes that God is "not considered to be bigger"; if you understand this, God exists in his mind; but in fact and in the minimal presence I thought there was a bigger existence than existed. There is much debate about the existence of God about the existence of God. For a long time everyone wanted to prove the existence of God. Some people think that God exists and is proved by many philosophical or scientific foundations and religious reasons. On the other hand, others do not believe in the existence of God and their foundation is proved from many theoretical and scientific point of view. Many people try to prove the existence of God with reason. After Descartes proves its existence, he will think the truth about the essence of God, evidence of the existence of God, and the nature of material objects. The main task in Descartes' meditation is to design a system that allows him to understand the truth. He wants to lay the foundation of all further philosophy The medieval society believed that humans existed because God wants them to exist. Descartes does not doubt the existence of God, I doubt that the existence of man is God's desire. He has a problem because he proved the existence of God using a series of theorems. He proved that thought is the essence of thinking. At that time the revolution supports the new idea of ​​"I think myself". It gives independent thinking and free will to human institutions, leading the age of enlightenment. For Descartes, thought proves that our existence is a conscious entity. By solving the survival problem, the thinkers of the 18th and 19th centuries established mathematical and scientific identity. Equivalent thoughts and consciousness do not satisfy thinking thoughts. Beyond the era of reason, we continue to doubt our existence

One of the three most popular arguments about the existence of God is that the most important attempt to prove the existence of God is an ontological argument of St. Anselm theologian of the 11th century. The view of Anselm is that God is defined as the greatest existence that must be imagined and must exist, as absent entities lack the fact that they lack its great attributes. However, the critics wonder whether their existence really contributes to the greatness of existence. There is much debate about the existence of God about the existence of God. For a long time everyone wanted to prove the existence of God. Some people think that God exists and is proved by many philosophical or scientific foundations and religious reasons. On the other hand, others do not believe in the existence of God and their foundation is proved from many theoretical and scientific point of view. Many people try to prove the existence of God with reason. After Descartes proves its existence, he will think the truth about the essence of God, evidence of the existence of God, and the nature of material objects. The main task in Descartes' meditation is to design a system that allows him to understand the truth. He wants to lay the foundation of all further philosophy The medieval society believed that humans existed because God wants them to exist. Descartes does not doubt the existence of God, I doubt that the existence of man is God's desire. He has a problem because he proved the existence of God using a series of theorems. He proved that thought is the essence of thinking. At that time the revolution supports the new idea of ​​"I think myself". It gives independent thinking and free will to human institutions, leading the age of enlightenment. For Descartes, thought proves that our existence is a conscious entity. By solving the survival problem, the thinkers of the 18th and 19th centuries established mathematical and scientific identity. Equivalent thoughts and consciousness do not satisfy thinking thoughts. Beyond the era of reason, we continue to doubt our existence Questions about the existence of God. In the times of Christianity, Judaism, and Muslim, the existence of God has never been questioned. The problem of the existence of God comes from our new way of thinking after these religions. Science makes us think about how things work in our world and casts doubts on the existence of God. Because Jesus did not do scientific research in the age of proveing ​​the existence of God, where did history people get the concept of God? Many philosophers

The hypothesis is not merely an educational speculation about what you think will happen. It must be testable! If you think that your assumptions are incorrect or if you think there was an error in collecting data, start over from the beginning! Management: Content used to compare results. Ā This is a variable with no arguments applied. Variable: Everything that changes in the experiment. Â There are two types: AAAAAAAAAAA independence: what will you intentionally change (cause) AAAAAAAAAAAA Dependency: what changes are observed or always the same experiments are continued to observe the AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAA measurement result (Effect). Independent variable Hypotheses need to be made to determine independent variables, dependent variables, control groups, experimental groups, and at least three constants. There is no correct way to enumerate the steps of a scientific method. Regardless of how the steps are recorded, the purpose of the scientific method is to gather data to validate or invalidate causal relationships. Scientific methods are often executed linearly, but once you reach a conclusion, this technique can be performed on a regular basis as it can cause more problems. Experiments according to scientific methods are characterized by independent variables and dependent variables. An independent variable is a factor that changes between tests or groups, and the dependent variable changes accordingly. In this example, the argument is the registration box to be displayed and the dependent variable is the number of registered members. All scientific fields are unified through the use of scientific methods. Scientific methods provide an objective way of scientific experimentation, allowing unbiased interpretation and sophistication of the world. Sir Francis Bacon (1561-1626) first outlined scientific methods and enabled logical and rational problem solving in many scientific fields. In all scientific fields, the main principles of scientific methods are verifiability, predictability, tampering, and fairness. Francis Bacon (1561 - 1626) British philosopher, politician, speaker and scientist. Bacon is considered "father of empiricism" because it is working on scientific phenomena research, systematization of scientific methodology, and structured scientific inquiry. He encourages his own example and philosophical experience. An important figure in the scientific revolution of the 17th century. Rene de Carte (1596 - 1650) Rene de Carte is a French philosopher and mathematician. Descartes made a great contribution to the philosophy of rationalism. Descartes' meditation is epoch-making. Because he suspects previous beliefs and is trying to prove their validity through logic. Later empiricists opposed Descartes' method, but his philosophy opened up many topics for further discussion. Descartes has been proved to be "the existence of God", but his doubt is an important step in promoting reasons over faith.

Psychological needs: If you need to face safety and safety after meeting and meeting physiological needs, no emotional or physical harm is necessary. People are guaranteed health insurance, health and welfare, safe work, personal safety, living in a safe environment, and economic safety. If you are injured, people will not have the motivation to achieve higher demand. After meeting physiological and safety needs, love and attribution needs become important. Mind / Soul - Mind or Seoul (these terms are interchangeable in Augustine) is an element that inspires mankind. It is "the life of the body", instructing the body, receiving sensory inputs and saving, and using concepts and ideas. But it is neither a part of God nor a kind of God. Manikaizim inadvertently recognized the soul of God, and now Augustine strongly opposed this view. The soul and thinking are also places where Augustine looks for God and seek inside to see the truth beyond the soul. This process leads to the investigation of Book X's memory (this is a characteristic of thought) For Augustine, an individual is a complex of body and soul, but there is asymmetry between the soul and the body so as to be consistent with his new platonism. As a spiritual entity, the soul is superior to the body and is the area that dominates the soul of the body. This raises the notion of a fairly positive soul - physical relationship, which is clearly contradictory to the depiction of Manchae's soul trap. But when you look at the question of how the soul is embodied, things are not so clear. Aristotle's homomorphic mapping model is a combination of substance and form, or a combination of body and soul, which is the two dimensions of existence (for Aristotle, the soul is the form of the body and the body is the matter of the soul). Descartes dualism is to separate matter, mind and soul into two entities or substances within a person. I add that both philosophers regard the soul and thought as the central position (the center of Aristotle and the pineal gland of Descartes' brain). There is controversy in Descartes' case, but it seems that there is a sense of interaction between them (see here). For Descartes, personal personal soul and thoughts are eternal.

"Skepticism" refers to the theory that we do not have knowledge, skepticism denies the existence of any reasonable beliefs. In this article we discuss the diversity of philosophical skepticism and explain various skeptical arguments and reactions to philosophical skepticism as well as Hume and Descartes. In this article we will also discuss various discussions and reasons for skepticism. Although skepticism and its discussions of various forms seem to be effective and theoretically justified, my position is against skepticism. The answer - apart from the doubt of the outside world - there is no philosophical debate on the realism of tropical fish, but it is an important philosophical challenge to scientific realism. The dimension of scientific realism understood as a philosophical position depends greatly on the reaction of scientific realists to these tasks. It is conceptually useful (and historically correct) to see the development of scientific realism as a response to four consecutive issues, as follows: "Skepticism" refers to the theory that we do not have knowledge, skepticism denies the existence of any reasonable beliefs. In this article we discuss the diversity of philosophical skepticism and explain various skeptical arguments and reactions to philosophical skepticism as well as Hume and Descartes. In this article we will also discuss various discussions and reasons for skepticism. Although skepticism and its discussions of various forms seem to be effective and theoretically justified, my position is against skepticism. It is easy to challenge the demands of knowledge by explicitly asking "How do you know", but this is not enough to prove that skepticism is an important position. Like other philosophical positions, skepticism must be supported by discussion. There are many arguments for defending skepticism and many answers have been provided for these discussions. Here we consider the two most prominent arguments that support skepticism about the outside world. In his first meditation, Rene Descartes proposed a debate that supported skepticism, then he tried to counter the later meditation. Discussion points out that some of our views are inaccurate. Our senses can deceive us; we sometimes mistake our dreams as calm experiences, the devils systematically deceive us.

The truth behind the existence of God exists in God. As a flesh and blood mass that we want to become immortal, we have created a way to guide the story so that we can become immortal. Christins called it Jesus, others call it alla or buddua. Does this make it better for a person to be better than for others, or for a series of rules that all of us follow, so that humans can prosper? Faith is this feature or pillar, and we all have the ability to believe. The question we ask is characteristic and the power of reason is property but we can not answer the question so much frightening us. There is much debate about the existence of God about the existence of God. For a long time everyone wanted to prove the existence of God. Some people think that God exists and is proved by many philosophical or scientific foundations and religious reasons. On the other hand, others do not believe in the existence of God, and their foundation is proved from many theoretical and scientific point of view. Many people try to prove the existence of God with reason. After Descartes proves its existence, people will consider the truth about the essence of God, evidence of the existence of God, and the nature of material objects. The main task in Descartes' meditation is to design a system that allows him to understand the truth. He wants to lay the foundation of all further philosophy The medieval society believed that humans existed because God wants them to exist. Descartes does not doubt the existence of God, I doubt that the existence of man is God's desire. He has a problem because he proved the existence of God using a series of theorems. He proved that thought is the essence of thinking. At that time the revolution supports the new idea of ​​"I think myself". It gives independent thinking and free will to human institutions, leading the age of enlightenment. For Descartes, thought proves that our existence is a conscious entity. By solving the survival problem, the thinkers of the 18th and 19th centuries established mathematical and scientific identity. Equivalent thoughts and consciousness do not satisfy thinking thoughts. Beyond the era of reason, we continue to doubt our existence

Evidence of the existence of God, whether or not it is God. There is no room for maneuvering. Attempts to preserve the existence and neutrality of God automatically become synonyms of distrust. The issue of God's presence is very important. Does God exist? In theology, cosmology, object theory and ontology there is a way to prove the existence of God. With all these great claims, do people deny that there are Gods? There is God, and for these reasons I will prove it. "Does God exist?" Fortunately, Richard Dawkins wrote a new book "God's Thoughts". This is exactly the answer to this question. After all, the answer is "No, God does not exist" (Do not deny that Dawkins reached his conclusion before the card won the World Series). Power is not enough to convince some experts. Literary critic Terry Eagleton provides an example of his idea for London Book Review. Eagleton's comments are discussed in some of my favorite blogs: 3 Quarks Daily, Pharyngula, Uncertain Principles, Valve (2), There is much debate about the existence of God about the existence of God. For a long time everyone wanted to prove the existence of God. Some people think that God exists and is proved by many philosophical or scientific foundations and religious reasons. On the other hand, others do not believe in the existence of God and their foundation is proved from many theoretical and scientific point of view. Many people try to prove the existence of God with reason. After Descartes proves its existence, he will think the truth about the essence of God, evidence of the existence of God, and the nature of material objects. The main task in Descartes' meditation is to design a system that allows him to understand the truth. He wants to lay the foundation of all further philosophy How does God exist? Does he exist? Does not he exist? These questions can be discussed in myriad theories that there are reasons why he exists, methods that do not exist, or do not exist, and there is no way to do it. Theologians argue that God exists and there is a reason to believe that God exists. On the other hand, agnostics, atheists, and followers will think that there is no reason to believe that God exists. For some people, they have no doubt about the existence of God ... the existence of God was a problem since the concept of God was imagined. Descartes tried to prove the existence of God, argued against his theory of the devil, and showed that there is no doubt that there is some external existence. He is looking for a definite certainty, the foundation on which he can base on all his beliefs and know that they are real facts. Descartes' overall project is to find a definite certainty that he can be based on all his knowledge and beliefs. Foundation

An example of a scientific approach to observation: In the major deforested areas of Rondia in Brazil, rainfall is intense or completely stopped. Theory: As a rainforest of Rhondonia, Brazilian farmlands are raining on the ground. And considerable direct rainfall. The amount of rainfall decreases because there are few trees to return water vapor to air by transpiration of trees or evaporation of water from trees. Relative humidity is the amount of water vapor in the air compared to the amount of steam necessary to saturate the air at the current temperature of the air. A good analysis Socratic question is the first example of modern "scientific method", where empirical analysis is established through ongoing analysis and improvement of human knowledge. This is a view of his human wisdom, and unless you have experienced and considered every aspect of a particular matter, it will never be 100% correct. On the other hand, he believes that the wisdom of God is the only real wisdom to understand the whole as a whole. The entire quest of his knowledge, "the life being examined" was born from the God of Delphi. After hearing the news, he began to explore poets, politicians, craftsmen and rhetoricists. All scientific fields are unified through the use of scientific methods. The scientific method provides an objective way for scientific experiments to enable fair interpretation and sophistication of the world. Sir Francis Bacon (1561 - 1626) first outlined scientific methods and enabled logical and rational problem solving in many scientific fields. In all scientific fields, the main principles of scientific methods are verifiability, predictability, tampering and fairness. Francis Bacon (1561-1626) British philosopher, politician, speaker and scientist. Bacon is considered to be "father of empiricism" for his work in the study of scientific phenomena and his work in advancing scientific methodology and structured scientific exploration. He encourages his own example and philosophical experience. An important figure in the scientific revolution of the 17th century. Rene de Carte (1596 - 1650) Rene de Carte is a French philosopher and mathematician. Descartes made a great contribution to the philosophy of rationalism. Descartes' meditation is epoch-making. Because he doubts the previous belief and is trying to prove their validity through logic. Later empiricists opposed Descartes' method, but his philosophy broke many topics for further discussion. Descartes has been proved to be "the existence of God", but his doubt is an important step in promoting reasons over faith.

There is always a unified connection from the perspective of the human diversity that prove the existence of God and the creatures on the earth. The root of the existence of human beings is the root of all natural and infinite things, best purpose, unintelligible things; what is reality and what is possible. Inspired by miracles, people are easily amazed by their existence and their doubts about their identity. The cause-and-effect relationship adequately states that "Things that start to exist must exist through something different from their own". Therefore, only things outside the world can create the world. Several important arguments from meditation III-V I. Third meditation: God presence A. Cosmological evidence of the existence of God In the third meditation, Descartes says that God (i) exists, ( The essence of being a creator of thinking), and (iii) the reason why the meditator exists (even if it exists at another moment from one moment). The premise of the existence of God is that each of us understands the following clear and unique concept of God. ... Prove the existence of God. The final evidence presented in the fifth meditation starts with the proposition of Descartes as a natural concept of perfect existence. Otherwise, he is not perfect, so we conclude that God must exist. This ontological argument about science is because they believe that God is omnipotent and that his will is completely free. Lie - logical contradiction - even the truth. In contrast, human wisdom is limited. ... Descartes proved the existence of God as soon as possible. However, Descartes does not know that this evidence does not contain errors unless he believes his clear and independent understanding of the step of reasoning is justifiable. Therefore, the clarity and standard of independent recognition,

Self-deception is described as a strong impulse and desire to maintain or defend the beliefs or concepts that are deemed true, even though there is strong evidence that the converse is true (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). Self-deception is "a way to prove a wrong belief" and these rationalizations may even be "to create yourself" (Skeptic's Dictionary; Outlook, 117). Some self-deception views indicate that this is a selfish act, but other views do not believe that this can not be avoided. Self-fraud is the most common destructive problem in an organization, and the Arbinger Institute says in their book "Leadership and Self-deception - Out of the Box". This refers to the self-motivation of the dysfunction we have discussed before: self prefers to deal with others as a problem. Self needs to prove that you deserve safety, adequacy, attribution, respect and meaning. It has five kinds of fear: death and injury, rarity, abandonment, humiliation and absurdity. I - This means I am a person - but I think others are my goals or means. They do not have the same position as mine - we are not equal. Because I am the center of my world, I feel I am more qualified. The relationship between me and other people is tradable. We exchange benefits and I will not get more than what I gave. I am selfish and I am not good at sympathy. It is not easy to see it in your way. I agree with myself and my needs. I think that I am the center What do you mean? In other words, I think self-fraud is evolving in fraud service. In other words, the main function of self-fraud is deceiving others. Neither will make it harder for others to discover your deceptive behavior and you will allow you to scam with less direct cognitive costs. So, if you lie to you about clues about what you really care about, my consciousness, the quality of my voice, or other deceptive consciousness, you may notice my blindness Hmm. . About the tension found. But if you do not know the fact that I lied to you, you will not get these detection paths. In this article we will consider the role of self-deception in Descartes meditation. It is believed that Descartes believes that self-deception is the origin of our misjudgment, but he insists that he is consciously using it to find the truth. He discovered that self-deception is a very effective tool for us to pursue the truth; it expands the ability to be released from our old conviction. Pause them. Therefore, Descartes proposed a first person logical psychological approach to philosophical research. Self-deception plays a very important role there. Cogito is not the first philosophical truth, it should be understood as the first psychological truth. But this is an important step in the study of Descartes philosophy and clarifies the relationship between the logical and psychological aspects of philosophical thinking.

In the face of the disagreement with colleagues, David Christensen calls his own dissertation "self-criticism of opinion divergence, appeal, understanding" as an independent settlement reaction. First, I will explain the principle of independence of Christensen concerning mediation. Then I will present how to avoid intuition outcomes in case of his argument, ultra reliable and basic cognitive resource differences. Christansen's principle of independence insists that it is impossible to avoid consequences contrary to intuition contradictions. Martin Kusch discusses the philosophical meaning of certain forms of cognitive relativism. It is impossible to show that the cognitive system is superior to all other cognitive systems in a problem-free manner. Special attention is paid to "standard problem". Attempts to deal with specific standards as objective criteria encountered regression problems. Femke Truijens is working on the idea that differences in symptomatic levels before and after treatment bring about a procedural, objective quantification of the therapeutic effect. She uses psychotherapy as a case and thinks that this method is effective for a problematic number. Because it is difficult to measure the level of symptoms objectively. What is the cognitive base for injecting "I" into 'I think' if Cogito does not assume a real self? When some critics mention "I", Descartes complains that he answers this question by prescribing the meaning established in "I am present." Among the critics, Bertrand Russell opposed the word "I am illegal". "In response to George Lichtenberg of the eighteenth century, Russell wrote that Descartes should be said." Russell added that the word "I" is grammatically useful, but not a description of the data. (1945, 567) Therefore, although there are various contents "I feel pain" and "I feel pain", Descartes has only the former

The existence of God The existence of God has become a subject of intense debate for generations. This usually happens between members of the religious community and all other members. In fact, the religious world itself does not necessarily reach God's consensus. This has led many saints to fight for his God through the field of words. Many theories have been advocated and all theories hold undoubtedly evidence of the existence of God. To write this paper I have read the four theories of various people with cloth and they all tried to discuss God in the sense of Christian. There is much debate about the existence of God about the existence of God. For a long time everyone wanted to prove the existence of God. Some people think that God exists and is proved by many philosophical or scientific foundations and religious reasons. On the other hand, others do not believe in the existence of God and their foundation is proved from many theoretical and scientific point of view. Many people try to prove the existence of God with reason. After Descartes proves its existence, he will think the truth about the essence of God, evidence of the existence of God, and the nature of material objects. The main task in Descartes' meditation is to design a system that allows him to understand the truth. He wants to lay the foundation of all further philosophy The medieval society believed that humans existed because God wants them to exist. Descartes does not doubt the existence of God, I doubt that the existence of man is God's desire. He has a problem because he proved the existence of God using a series of theorems. He proved that thought is the essence of thinking. At that time the revolution supports the new idea of ​​"I think myself". It gives independent thinking and free will to human institutions, leading the age of enlightenment. For Descartes, thought proves that our existence is a conscious entity. By solving the survival problem, the thinkers of the 18th and 19th centuries established mathematical and scientific identity. Equivalent thoughts and consciousness do not satisfy thinking thoughts. Beyond the era of reason, we continue to doubt our existence

Discussion about the existence of God I chose Christianity to study this particular course. Over the centuries philosophers and theologians have done many different arguments about the existence of God. The specific discussion I discuss is a theoretical discussion and a cosmological argument. =========================================================== ================================================== ======== Discussion that is most widely accepted and criticized about the existence of God. My purpose in this article is to explain why cosmological arguments are proof of the existence of God, to understand that it is the importance of posteriori posteriori discussion, and to my common argument It is to observe the position of. First of all, as a living person on earth, we can safely conclude that the majority of things that exist today have their cause. I confirmed that there is a reason. Before attempting to explain and evaluate the moral argument about God's existence, it is beneficial to understand the purpose of God's existential argument. Of course, though the views on this are diverse, most contemporary supporters do not believe that theoretical arguments are "proof". They should provide effective arguments and prerequisites that reasonable people can not deny. Such success criterion obviously sets high criteria for success and supporters of the argument of the writer can hardly meet philosophical discussions of interesting conclusions in areas other than formal logic such criteria Correctly point out. Is the premise of these arguments reasonable, at least for reasonable people, more reasonable than rejection? Discussion of Rene Descartes on the existence of God Rene Descartes's debate about the existence of God is related to his rationalistic deduction reasoning. Descartes concluded that the truth about the existence of God exists in His idea about the completeness of God and the essence of God (as a complete existence that must exist to be perfect). As a rationalist philosopher, Descartes truncates human knowledge as a product of our sensory data (our senses), but an epistemological sense that our knowledge can be obtained through a process of deducing our own idea I support the position. Second argument about the existence of God. Because Descartes believes the existence is perfect, it can become a predicate to God. First, I will explain what the ontological argument of the existence of God is. Next, I will explain why Descartes decided to incorporate God into his philosophical approach. As a predicate of God existence reveals some truth about God. Ontology seeks to prove the existence of God from a transcendental point of view

Presence or presence of responses to the Nilofar Shidmehr God In recent years scientists have found a surprising discovery that the existence of carbon based life in the universe depends on a set of unlikely initial conditions. In their article "Human Skopos Theory", [1] Betty and Cordel cited some of these conditions in cosmology and biochemistry. If the initial conditions of the universe change slightly, life will be impossible. There is much debate about the existence of God about the existence of God. For a long time everyone wanted to prove the existence of God. Some people think that God exists and is proved by many philosophical or scientific foundations and religious reasons. On the other hand, others do not believe in the existence of God, and their foundation is proved from many theoretical and scientific point of view. Many people try to prove the existence of God with reason. After Descartes proves its existence, people will consider the truth about the essence of God, evidence of the existence of God, and the nature of material objects. The main task in Descartes' meditation is to design a system that allows him to understand the truth. He wants to lay the foundation of all further philosophy The medieval society believed that humans existed because God wants them to exist. Descartes does not doubt the existence of God, I doubt that the existence of man is God's desire. He has a problem because he proved the existence of God using a series of theorems. He proved that thought is the essence of thinking. At that time the revolution supports the new idea of ​​"I think myself". It gives independent thinking and free will to human institutions, leading the age of enlightenment. For Descartes, thought proves that our existence is a conscious entity. By solving the survival problem, the thinkers of the 18th and 19th centuries established mathematical and scientific identity. Equivalent thoughts and consciousness do not satisfy thinking thoughts. Beyond the era of reason, we continue to doubt our existence Questions about the existence of God. In the times of Christianity, Judaism, and Muslim, the existence of God has never been questioned. The problem of the existence of God comes from our new way of thinking after these religions. Science reminds us how things work in our world and casts doubt on the existence of God. Because Jesus did not do scientific research in the age of proveing ​​the existence of God, where did history people get the concept of God? Many philosophers

For centuries mathematics has evolved surprisingly. From the beginning, many mathematicians have influenced and contributed to mathematics known today. There is no one comparing works of Sir Isaac Newton. He has influence as a person and his work. Sir Isaac Newton was born on Woolthorp in Lincolnshire State on December 25, 1642. Shortly after the death of his father, Newton was born as a premature baby and is not expected to survive. After his father died, her mother remarried to an ignorant man. According to the report, when talking to Lord David Brewster (1831) of Isaac Newton 's lifetime about Edmund Halley' s disrespect of religious belief, Newton replied. In recent years, this has often been cited as a statement specifically defending astrology. Newton wrote sharply on the importance of prophecies and studied alchemy, but there is little evidence that he is focusing on astrology. In footnote, Brewster condemned the anecdote of the astronomer Neville mask line, which is said to have given it to Oxford professor Stephen Peter Ligo. Sir Isaac Newton was born on Woolthorp Estate in England on December 25, 1642. He was born too early and is a child. His mother said that he was too young, he can fit in the rhetoric pot. Sir Isaac Newton was born three months after his father died. When Sir Isaac Newton was three years old, the mother remarried to the pastor Barnabas Smith. Sir Isaac Newton stayed in the care of his grandmother. From 12 years old to 17 years old, he received education at the King Grantham School. Isaac Newton entered the Cambridge Trinity College under the emergency of his uncle William Ayscough ("Newton, Sir Isak", Encyclopedia of Mathematics Biography, 394). Newton studied law at Cambridge, but the results were very different. When Newton was at the university, the school's philosophy dominated Aristotle's philosophy. Later, he became more generous at the university third grader, so he started studying the philosophy of Descartes, Galsendi and Boyle. Viete, Descartes, Wallis 'new analytic geometry, and Galileo' s Copernican astronomy dynamics also fascinated him. When Barro arrived in Cambridge's Lucasian chair ("Jazz Isaac Newton", ONLINE), Newton's talent began to grow. Isaac Barrow began to recognize him, soon he became a mentor of Isaac Newton. Under the direction of Isaac Barrow, Isaac Newton began to show his great wisdom. Isaac Newton received a math scholarship!

In the reading by Richard Swinburne, he evaluated the interaction between the mortality of the soul and the human body. His position was best explained as attribution to the soul's light bulb, and attributed the brain to a functional socket: "Functional if the socket (brain) is damaged or current is blocked When the brain is inserted, the soul will function, destroying the brain, the soul will not function and stop the activity. Thoughts and souls are sometimes considered to be two different aspects of a common mind. However, some people feel that the heart and soul are mutually exclusive. The mind focuses not only on the cognitive side of the body and the soul but also on the empirical process. It is interchangeable many times, but the existence of people is related to mindfulness and deep thinking The interrelationship between mind, body and soul is a complex and rich research field. Psychological, spiritual, physical and spiritual welfare work synergistically, and if the happy field is not the best level it can be said to have a negative effect on it. Other aspects Therefore, it is important for individuals to find a balance and harmony between these factors, and to understand that each factor has a symbiotic relationship with other factors. In this article I will explain in detail the basic principles for achieving health in each field and investigate how they relate to each other so that people can enjoy the health and wellness peaks. An important problem has arisen. For Aristotle, how can the transcendence of matter be exceeded to think of mind and soul as substances, or not as important? Given their intimacy, given the trends of biological determinants, is the heart and soul really free? For Descartes, how does the soul and the spirit actually act on the body and interact with it? Descartes' model is determined by the forces of nature decided by many people, but does it sufficiently indicate that thoughts and souls are affected by their separation? Body? These questions include moral and meaningful existence. If human behavior is determined by heaven or natural forces, are they morally good or bad? Otherwise, how about human dignity? Can we have confidence in our feelings, it seems that situation - freedom of choice - is not an illusion?

Time is Europe of the 18th century, thinking flows, and intellectuals name themselves in academia. Many highly trained and trained people are deeply digging their brains to make up for what is happening on Earth and beyond. Philosophers Dennis Diderot, Voltaire, Cesare Beccaria, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, John Rock will help educate the logic and philosophical thinking of Western European people and explain the world around them To contribute to enlightenment. Rationality: Enlightenment philosophers believe that rational thinking can lead to human progress and is the most reasonable way of thinking. According to PBS, they believe that inference abilities are the most important and valuable human abilities. The reason is that human beings can eliminate ignorance and absurdities, learn to reasonably think, and help teach people to act reasonably. Philosophers of Enlightenment believe that each person's thought and behavior is guided by reason, so that reason has an influence on human nature as well. Rene Descartes (1596 - 1650) French philosopher and mathematician. Descartes was an early representative of rationalism and rationality and laid an important framework for European enlightenment. The reasons for solving problems related to the use of his logic and religion are groundbreaking. He also made a big discovery in mathematics and calculus. John Rock (1632-1704) British political philosopher rock was a leading philosopher and political theorist who deeply influenced liberal political thought during the American and French revolution. He is believed to have several ideas like a social contract - you need to get the idea that the government is agreed by rulers. Locke also claims liberty, religious tolerance, and life and property rights. With enlightenment, the rule of religion over the political situation in Europe is over. Enlightenment, or Age of Reason, was the product of the idea of ​​a new group of philosophers including the 17th century scientific revolution and Voltaire, Rousseau, and Locke, who suspected the religion with suspicion. Although religion is not completely out of politics, the rationality of the Enlightenment is at least in part attributed to the American Revolution in 1776 and the French Revolution in 1789. Aatif Rashid writes international politics and culture I will. His articles are published in magazines such as The Oxonian Globalist and are also posted in future foreign policy and ThinkPolitic online magazines. He has a bachelor's degree in English and history from the UK. MSc in Berkeley and Oxford

The purpose of this paper is to study the origin, nature, and characteristics of the framework used by critics of various public accounting experts. In this article, I will mainly focus on three questions. (2) Do you know from a specialized answer how the problem is recognized? (3) Can the current reaction model lead a profession? Our analysis identifies two different frameworks that are the basis for criticism of occupations. We regard these as the viewpoints of "rational scientist" and "humanist philosopher". These frameworks differ in how we address phenomena between subjects. The difference in conceptual objectivity is particularly evident. As a result, this occupation is in a position to deal with a series of important criteria without being framed by an agreement, caught between the intersections of these ideas. Unfortunately, they seem to be more inclined to the objective position of "rational scientists" that may exacerbate their difficulties. I would like to thank my colleagues and UCLA conference participants for writing this article. In particular, the insights of Jan Oliver improved ideas and presentations. Lauren Newton and Anthony Tinker have compiled several useful proposals. Many of the ideas here come from the previous collaboration with Sam Culbert. Considering the mutual participation of circle and language exchange between this subject matter, how do we interpret individual theme? The basis of "inter-subject project" shared by Hubermas theorists with Buber and Mead not only offset the exaggerated subjective prejudice in philosophical philosophy but also overwhelming in collective overwhelming social norms It is to avoid individuals. Therefore depriving individualized autonomy and spontaneity. Subjectiveism is aimed at creating an intermediate process between Descartes subjectiveism and Marxistic collectivism extremes (Voloshinov, 1996). This process is fundamentally basic. These ontologies present a consistent relationship in which relationships are dominant and relationships are composed of those relationships. Subjectivity overrides subjectivity (meaning Descartes) in this ontology. Of course, in these alternative ontologies as well, subjectivity is based on subjectivity of "essential experience". Experiencing identity is a necessary condition between subjectivity, but the form of individual subjects (how to form and process intrinsicities in individual subjects) is not necessary - and in the case of Whitehead and Buddhism There is no need for existing flutes Curl body. These formats are widely recognized as central experiences in the interaction between subjects and the flow of facts and are individual subjects.

Geometry is actually used in ancient Egypt and Babylon around 2000 BC. In order for the Egyptians to build buildings as large as the pyramids, they must be planned before they are actually built, and geometry must be used in these plans. There is evidence that Babylon's movie understands Pythagorean's theorem. The so-called "father" of geometry is a Greek mathematician, Euclid. He wrote "elements", "assumptions and theorems" that paved the way to modern geometry. In this article, we will first briefly introduce the main branch points of geometry and then describe extensive history processing. For specific branches of geometry, see Euclidean geometry, analytical geometry, projective geometry, differential geometry, non-Euclidean geometry and topology. In some ancient cultures geometric shapes that match the relationships of object length, area and volume have been developed. This geometry compiles about 300 generations based on 10 axioms or assumptions in Euclidian elements where hundreds of theorems are proved by deductive logic. That element is typical of a century-long axiomatic way. Ancient Greeks practiced centuries experimental geometry like Egypt and Babylonia, which absorbed experimental geometry of both cultures. Then they create the first formal mathematics of every type by organizing the geometry with logical rules. An important geometric book of Euclid (400 BC) The Elements forms the basis for most of the geometric foundation of the school. Descartes has become one of the greatest advances in geometry by linking algebra and geometry. One myth is that when you think about placing a point on a plane with a pair of numbers, he is looking around flying around the ceiling. Perhaps this is related to the fact that he is asleep until 11am everyday. Fermat also found coordinate geometry, but that is the Cartesian version we use today. Early in the 17th century, geometry achieved two important developments. The first is the analytic geometry created by René Descartes (1596-1650) and Pierre de Fermat (1601-1665), or geometry including coordinates and equations. This is a necessary prerequisite for the development of calculus and the accurate quantitative science of physics. The second geometrical development in this period was a systematic study of projective geometry by Girard Desargues (1591-1661). Projection geometry is geometry without measurement or parallel lines, but the interrelationship of research points

Does God exist? St. Thomas Aquinas wrote several important works. Some of them are as follows. Controversy over the power of God, Dionysius' game about the name of God, and controversy over psychobiology. Most of Akinas' work is written to prove the existence of God. Aquinas always believed that everyone should have the Creator, and the only viable solution is God. Based on this idea, the third path of Aquinas was written. Aquinas argues that in his world immortal confrontation, human rationalism can not prove the impossibility of the eternal creation of the universe. "Does God exist?" Fortunately, Richard Dawkins wrote a new book "God's Thoughts". This is exactly the answer to this question. After all, the answer is "No, God does not exist" (Do not deny that Dawkins reached his conclusion before the card won the World Series). Power is not enough to convince some experts. Literary critic Terry Eagleton provides an example of his idea for London Book Review. Eagleton's comments are discussed in some of my favorite blogs: 3 Quarks Daily, Pharyngula, Uncertain Principles, Valve (2), There is much debate about the existence of God about the existence of God. For a long time everyone wanted to prove the existence of God. Some people think that God exists and is proved by many philosophical or scientific foundations and religious reasons. On the other hand, others do not believe in the existence of God and their foundation is proved from many theoretical and scientific point of view. Many people try to prove the existence of God with reason. After Descartes proves its existence, he will think the truth about the essence of God, evidence of the existence of God, and the nature of material objects. The main task in Descartes' meditation is to design a system that allows him to understand the truth. He wants to lay the foundation of all further philosophy How does God exist? Does he exist? Does not he exist? These questions can be discussed in myriad theories that there are reasons why he exists, methods that do not exist, or do not exist, and there is no way to do it. Theologians argue that God exists and there is a reason to believe that God exists. On the other hand, agnostics, atheists, and followers will think that there is no reason to believe that God exists. For some people, they have no doubt about the existence of God ... the existence of God was a problem since the concept of God was imagined. Descartes tried to prove the existence of God, argued against his theory of the devil, and showed that there is no doubt that there is some external existence. He is looking for a definite certainty, the foundation on which he can base on all his beliefs and know that they are real facts. Descartes' overall project is to find a definite certainty that he can be based on all his knowledge and beliefs. Foundation

Exploring the evidence of the existence of God Christians can present many arguments to prove the existence of God or cast doubts. Why are we here? What is the purpose of our existence? Thomas Aquinas is a Catholic theologian. The universe is designed to be quite complicated and well designed and is considered to be unlikely to happen by chance. Nature is very complex, but everyone is well integrated and there must be a creator. But, if the Creator believes so many people are intangible, intangible, tasteless, and silent, how can we prove that this God is the truth? Among the three arguments to prove the existence of God, I think that Akinus's cosmological argument is based on empirical evidence, and that simple and practical attention is accepted in both history and science I will find out what was proved. Aquinas initially stated that the existence of God is not a trivial preliminary question, so we need to test the influence of God, and even though we can not completely understand the essence of God, the existence of God Can be observed to prove. - Executive summary This report covers the evaluation of myIT Labs software. It provides insight into why the software does not meet the expectations of intended use of Microsoft Word and Excel. This is based on a weekly test There is much debate about the existence of God about the existence of God. For a long time everyone wanted to prove the existence of God. Some people think that God exists and is proved by many philosophical or scientific foundations and religious reasons. On the other hand, others do not believe in the existence of God and their foundation is proved from many theoretical and scientific point of view. Many people try to prove the existence of God with reason. After Descartes proves its existence, he will think the truth about the essence of God, evidence of the existence of God, and the nature of material objects. The main task in Descartes' meditation is to design a system that allows him to understand the truth. He wants to lay the foundation of all further philosophy The medieval society believed that humans existed because God wants them to exist. Descartes does not doubt the existence of God, I doubt that the existence of man is God's desire. He has a problem because he proved the existence of God using a series of theorems. He proved that thought is the essence of thinking. At that time the revolution supports the new idea of ​​"I think myself". It gives independent thinking and free will to human institutions, leading the age of enlightenment. For Descartes, thought proves that our existence is a conscious entity. By solving the survival problem, the thinkers of the 18th and 19th centuries established mathematical and scientific identity. Equivalent thoughts and consciousness do not satisfy thinking thoughts. Beyond the era of reason, we continue to doubt our existence

The word that God does not exist is meaningless as the triangle of a rectangle. Against ontological arguments Nothing, nothing. The universe can not appear suddenly. For the first reason reason The universe is necessary for human beings to prosper. Christianity can explain this, but you can not atheism. The opposite of design theory Morality consists of a collection of prestigious orders. Only God can make such orders. I disagree with moral argument For those who can not deal with the reality of life without God, is religious belief a mere emotional crutch? Do we have to renounce the absolute truth proposition of Christianity to accept other faith claims? The medieval society believed that humans existed because God wants them to exist. Descartes does not doubt the existence of God, I doubt that the existence of man is God's desire. He has a problem because he used a series of theorems to prove the existence of God. He proved that thought is the essence of thinking. At that time the revolution supported a new idea of ​​"I think it was the case." It led to the era of enlightenment by giving independent thinking and free will to the human institution. For Descartes, thought proves that our existence is a conscious entity. Due to the solution of the problem, the thinkers of the 18th and 19th centuries formed identities based on mathematics and science. Equivalent thoughts and consciousness do not satisfy thinking thoughts. After the era of reason, we continue to doubt our existence Questions about the existence of God. In the times of Christianity, Judaism, and Muslim, the existence of God has never been questioned. The problem of existence of God comes from our new way of thinking after these religions. Science makes us think about how things work in our world and casts doubt on the existence of God. In the times of Jesus, scientific research has not proved that God exists. Where do the people of history get the concept of God? Many philosophers There is much debate about the existence of God about the existence of God. For a long time everyone wanted to prove the existence of God. Some people think God exists and is proved by many philosophical or scientific foundations and religious reasons. On the other hand, others do not believe in the existence of God and their foundation is proved from many theoretical and scientific point of view. Many people try to prove the existence of God with reason. After Descartes proves his existence, people will consider the truth about the nature of God, the proof of the existence of God, and the nature of matter. The main task in Descartes' meditation is to design a system that will allow him to understand the truth. He wants to further lay the foundation of all philosophy

Regardless of whether the body and the mind are the same, or whether they are two different entities, they live in the same space in a sense. This is a philosophical question, and there is no doubt that many people are trying to find out the answer. The mind is the center of our whole existence. Our idea helps us understand the world around us and the people inside us. The mind is our desire for subconsciousness and consciousness, all enclosed in a neat little package. Our idea is our hope and dream to promote us in our lives and to provide our goals for our actions in our daily life. Further isolation of individuals, In addition, Descartes will divide his solid unity. Descartes separates and separates the mind from the body (I think (mind), therefore I (physical, exist)) or the concept of the spirit and soul of the West from the body (thought, consciousness) Continue to divide. Since Freud further broke it, thought / thinking itself is divided or divided into various elements. - Include Descartes' radical skepticism (inductive reasoning) and empiricism (science emphasizes observable measurable facts) and psychology fields in Plato / Aristotle / religious deduction analysis. Thought is an abstract place, and Freud's theory is based on analysis and abstract logical guesses rather than focusing on the theory which is easy to observe, measure, quantify, test and verify. The mind calms down, pure, unified, and removes the distracting flow of thought. Through intelligent training, focused attention focuses on thinking and physical elements and investigates and reflects their unique characteristics. This wisdom gradually matured, reached the climax of understanding, and brought complete purification and spiritual dissolution. As a general rule, all three-step road exercises are feasible for anyone in any industry. The Buddha taught it to amateurs and monks, and many of his non-experts have reached a very high stage. But for those who fully received mental training and fully appreciate all other issues to live in "brahmacariya", the development of this path has become most effective.

Philosophy of the heart can dissect the brain and try to elucidate what is going on inside. That is what Philopher is about to do today. Why do I have to dissect the brain? This question is based on the simple fact that Philophers wants to know why what happens in the human brain. You can return to knowing and believe something. We also learn emotions by expression of facial expressions. Reading your face is a difficult task. Philosophy of the heart is a field of philosophy to study the essence of the mind. Although other problems such as difficulty of consciousness and the nature of a particular state of mind are solved, the problem of mind and body is a paradigm in the philosophy of the mind. The spiritual aspects of this research include psychological events, psychological functions, psychological attributes, consciousness, the existence theory of mind, the essence of thinking, the relationship between the mind and the body. Dualism and monism are two central ideas about mind and body, and although there are minor differences, they are not perfectly suited to either one. Dualism is present in both the East and the West tradition (Hindu philosophy and Plato's Sankhya and yoga school), but its entry into the Western philosophy is due to the 17th century René Descartes I believe dualism of interactionism or interactionism is a theory in the philosophy of the mind and that matter and mind are two different independent substances that produce causal effects on each other. It is dualistic and traditionally material dualism, but sometimes it sometimes is it property dualism. Interactionism was proposed by French rationalism philosopher Rene Descartes (1596-1650) and continues to be associated with him. Descartes believes that the body is material and characterized by a spatial extent rather than thought and emotion. However, he insists that the two interact, suggesting that this interaction occurs in the pineal gland of the brain.

Truth, what is the truth? The question itself has thousands of answers Can not tell anyone what the truth is It can prove that the truth is correct It can check reliability through strong evidence and logic. If evidence proves to be accurate, we can be confident that the answer is true. But have you ever tried to think about what we are interested in finding the truth? Thinking about the problem, embark on the path of knowledge. I definitely have. This world has witnessed some of the great philosophers like Aristotle, Plato, Socrates. There is much debate about the existence of God about the existence of God. For a long time everyone wanted to prove the existence of God. Some people think that God exists and is proved by many philosophical or scientific foundations and religious reasons. On the other hand, others do not believe in the existence of God, and their foundation is proved from many theoretical and scientific point of view. Many people try to prove the existence of God with reason. After Descartes proves its existence, people will consider the truth about the essence of God, evidence of the existence of God, and the nature of material objects. The main task in Descartes' meditation is to design a system that allows him to understand the truth. He wants to lay the foundation of all further philosophy The medieval society believed that humans existed because God wants them to exist. Descartes does not doubt the existence of God, I doubt that the existence of man is God's desire. He has a problem because he proved the existence of God using a series of theorems. He proved that thought is the essence of thinking. At that time the revolution supports the new idea of ​​"I think myself". It gives independent thinking and free will to human institutions, leading the age of enlightenment. For Descartes, thought proves that our existence is a conscious entity. By solving the survival problem, the thinkers of the 18th and 19th centuries established mathematical and scientific identity. Equivalent thoughts and consciousness do not satisfy thinking thoughts. Beyond the era of reason, we continue to doubt our existence

This song is about a girlfriend who broke up with him, not a girlfriend who crossed the road in the opposite direction, who knows it is love at first sight. He thinks she knows this is love, she will fall in love with him, he is determined to find this girl. He said that many comments that came to fix his "sorrow" said they had homeless people in the corner, but this guy is not homeless, 'I am not bankrupt, I am " Just a sad man " In a sense, we can mask anyone - no one knows who he is. But we also believe that the masked people are not strangers properly. No one can become another person. I can not be you, you can not be me. Therefore, if my father is not a mask person, my father can not be a mask person. If my father is a masked man, then my father can not be a masked person. We can apply this result to Descartes imaginable argument. Descartes believes that the mind can exist irrespective of the body, since it can be imagined that the mind exists irrespective of the body. But this will not continue. Because the concept of Descartes' heart (or body) may be wrong, he does not know that the mind is not independent of the body, it can not exist separately from the body. This is a story of a special person, especially known as Neo. Neo, like other men, discovered that it is impossible for neo, "to move the muscles" until the mind people forgive it. Such control of the physical symptoms of human neo is causing people's minds to disrupt their beliefs about system superiority to some extent. Neo's heart is sometimes frustrating. And it is. They are smarter and more competent than colleagues in the mind division, but their advantage is that they are useless as human processes require that they perform all their observations through the mind. Also, dealing with spiritual error handling and inefficiency results in the loss of large amounts of data, resulting in understanding and interpretation of the situation, significant delays in planning and execution of actions.

If "Cogito Ergo Sum" of René Descartes embodies the essence of unity and reasonable Descartes' meaning, T.S. Elliott's "mountain of broken statues" enthusiastically incorporates contemporary things that are scattered and alienated (post). The message conveyed by this sentence was resonating throughout the poem from that poem "The Waste Land" to the last slogan "Shantih shantih shantih". All words, phrases, sentences (or simply images) that make up this poem seem to be in the Levi-Strauss word. "Because the image of Elliot means not to use a fixed meaning, it makes me thinking reminiscent Abandoned land, TS Eliot (1922) 1931, TS Eliot (1888-1965) wrote 434 lines of poet divided into five parts. Symbol and extensive scope After World War I, literature reproduced the sense of social, cultural and personal division suffered by civilization. This verse contrasts past ideas and moral grandness with vulgar, decadent and worthless phenomena. This poem means that modern life is a great waste of spirit. Since Elliot was first published and became one of the main metaphors of the 20th century, this term has been used in countless short stories, novels, poems, and plays. Watanabe, Silvia (1953-) Facts about companions of American short story document, 2nd edition (literary series companion) Elliott wrote "Wasted Land" in 1921 after he recovered from the collapse of tension. "It is considered to be the most important poem of the 20th century, and T. S. Eliot's" The Waste Land "is a kind of slope for despair and purpose of modern Western civilization. I thought Hal could move, but I think that The Waste Land is very interesting and sometimes lyrical, but I think that it is often difficult to understand. Successfully, I can not understand the passage of French and German, I feel that there is a tendency for Elliot and the editor of the book to reversibly give up. Waste land - the last thing. If T. J. Eckleburg and his ashes sound like T. S. Eliot and his "Wildland", A + is for you: you are obviously very concerned about the English lesson. T. J. Eckleburg is a nod to Fitzgerald's modernist poet T. S. Eliot and his view on the society after the First World War is as irritable as Fitzgerald. So, what about this hypothesis? Does Fitzgerald make Elliot a Prophet of his generation? Or was he indirectly tied Elliott to Ash Valley? Maybe he was born - Tom's family is really rich. It is not as wealthy as the family of Nick, not as wealthy as Gatsby, but they are rich and money came back. In addition, he used it as a luxury and crazy thing, like bringing a polypony yarn to the woods' lake.

The cosmological argument about the existence of God is based on the principle of causality. This basically means that the universe is the influence of career, this is God. One of the oldest and most famous supporters of the cosmological controversy outlines his argument for the existence of God in an article titled "Five Ways". The first way he insisted was to deal with that movement. Aquinas said that in order for something to move, it must be moved. It will not move without external force. Discussion that is most widely accepted and criticized about the existence of God. My purpose in this article is to explain why cosmological arguments are proof of the existence of God, to understand that it is the importance of posteriori posteriori discussion, and to my common argument It is to observe the position of. First of all, as a living person on earth, we can safely conclude that the majority of things that exist today have their cause. I confirmed that there is a reason. Before attempting to explain and evaluate the moral argument about God's existence, it is beneficial to understand the purpose of God's existential argument. Of course, though the views on this are diverse, most contemporary supporters do not believe that theoretical arguments are "proof". They should provide effective arguments and prerequisites that reasonable people can not deny. Such success criterion obviously sets high criteria for success and supporters of the argument of the writer can hardly meet philosophical discussions of interesting conclusions in areas other than formal logic such criteria Correctly point out. Is the premise of these arguments reasonable, at least for reasonable people, more reasonable than rejection? Discussion of Rene Descartes on the existence of God Rene Descartes's debate about the existence of God is related to his rationalistic deduction reasoning. Descartes concluded that the truth about the existence of God exists in His idea about the completeness of God and the essence of God (as a complete existence that must exist to be perfect). - All moral arguments about the existence of God are based on the principle that all of us share common sense of morality. Despite cultural differences, in a broad sense, people all over the world have ambiguous thoughts about right and wrong; a moral argument to the existence of God is that this mutual understanding is evidence of the existence of God I will say that. Immanuel Kant advocated this argument (not a moral argument); a god as a source of objective morality

Certainty and doubt, contrary to doubt and certainty, they have advantages and disadvantages. When you see everyone's pros and cons, they are equally important in their lives. According to Phelps this is certain, this is a way to accomplish something that leads you to success, but as Russell said, you need to doubt that you are in your heart To make further progress towards success in the outlook. With certainty and doubt, success will definitely continue. Phelps tells us in his statement that certainty is all that is necessary to achieve whatever you want. Sometimes certainty helps us achieve it, but there is ... Read more Elizabeth's situation in Kruger's Burg doubts John is a loyal person, as a clear example of this is the reason she is doubting the past experience. Her doubt is correct as she learned that she was greedy with his mistress Abigail. This only shows that doubt leads to something that can realize the truth. As for disadvantages, the worst thing for asylum seekers is to doubt that too many people will let some of these great things out of them. If they doubt that they can do their job well, they will only lose such a big success opportunity. Suspicion over someone's life can easily change it in a good or bad way. Looking at the advantages and disadvantages of both, the difference between doubt and certainty is not that big. They will all change the lives of people. Whether the change is good or bad depends on the direction the person chooses for himself. Both Phelps and Russell are correct. Because you can not succeed without any doubt or conviction. Because they are closely involved with everyone. TOK essay Jeana Joy Tan Belief is described as "to decide what is not visible". Does this description apply to some, all, or all of the knowledge? Over the years philosophers have struggled to overcome the concept of faith, conviction and knowledge. Both sides raised many controversial arguments and arguments, but we have not reached a general consensus yet. But the discussion here is that belief can promote knowledge in all fields. But Please try to answer these questions by examining yourself and God through meditation. In meditation II, Descartes recognizes and understands thinking, so I think that my idea is certain. Many of his problems led him from certainty to the next problem. As his claim is deemed correct, the explanation for these ideas is obvious. Descartes' heart started to compete in his first meditation. As he gets older, he wonders if the truth is still the same as the fact he knew before. The deterministic impossibility of allegations of "Hamlet" is the idea that the questioner chooses from a pair of choices without having to face a single answer or lack of answers. "Because Hamlet is an inevitable condition for Hamlet to pursue certainty," Hamlet "in Harlee Levin William Shakespeare's" Hallet Problem "is considered a mystery of Bird's biggest drama It is. Hamlet is not just confused by visions and orders I can not understand Does the deterministic suspicion really provide security or set security against failure? Does the question lead to negative or preparation for the future? Whether certainty or doubt leads to dreams, goals and future realization is questionable. Certainty creates security and assurance, but what is sure thing? There is absolutely nothing in the world; the human world can be reversed in days, hours, minutes or seconds. Unlike certainty, suspicion makes it possible to know that a person may face a person. William Lyon Phelps supports confidence as a factor of success, and Bertrand Russell is doubtful to create comfort and prepare for reality. Use ... to display further Certainty and doubt, contrary to doubt and certainty, they have advantages and disadvantages. When you see everyone's pros and cons, they are equally important in their lives. According to Phelps this is certain, this is a way to accomplish something that leads you to success, but as Russell said, y

Sir Isaac Newton is considered one of the most outstanding scientists in history. He is often portrayed as an individual who adopts the image of a scientist who saw the world in absolute ways and created the era of experiential science in the modern world for centuries of ignorance and superstition. However, various sources personalize Newton in various ways. There is evidence that Newton is the pursuer of all knowledge integration, I believe that the principle of the universe has a unified theory. Isaac Newton was born in Woolthorp in England in 1643. His father died three months before his birth. His mother remarried, but he did not want to raise Isaac. Isaac Newton was raised by his grandmother. He attended a free grammar school and went to Cambridge's Trinity College. Newton went round the university. While attending college, he became interested in mathematics, physics and astronomy. Newton has a bachelor's degree and a master's degree. He was writing his thoughts in the journal while studying at Newton University. Newton has a new idea of ​​sports. He also has the idea of ​​light diffraction, light and power. Newton's idea was very good, so Queen Anne sealed him as jazz in 1705. Sir Isaac Newton died in 1727 Isaac Newton entered the Cambridge Trinity College under the emergency of his uncle William Ayscough ("Newton, Sir Isak", Encyclopedia of Mathematics Biography, 394). Newton studied law at Cambridge, but the results were very different. When Newton was at the university, the school's philosophy dominated Aristotle's philosophy. Later, he became more generous at the university third grader, so he started studying the philosophy of Descartes, Galsendi and Boyle. Viete, Descartes, Wallis 'new analytic geometry, and Galileo' s Copernican astronomy dynamics also fascinated him. When Barro arrived in Cambridge's Lucasian chair ("Jazz Isaac Newton", ONLINE), Newton's talent began to grow. Isaac Barrow began to recognize him, soon he became a mentor of Isaac Newton. Under the direction of Isaac Barrow, Isaac Newton began to show his great wisdom. Isaac Newton received a math scholarship! Isaac Newton was born at Woolthorp Palace near Grantham, Lincolnshire. Isaac Newton is a mathematician and physicist, he is the most important scientific wisdom in history. Newton is from a family of farmers. Isaac was named after his father, but he died three months ago and he did not know his father. In 1661, Isaac Newton entered Cambridge University which was my uncle's old university and was elected a member of Trinity College in 1667. After graduating from college, he became a professor Newton's most successful work was his physics and astrodynamics work. Newton wrote three books, each explaining a new thing and talking more about his first gravity theory. Newton recognizes gravity as a fundamental force to control movement of celestial bodies. But when he wrote the "principle" he did not find the reason. In 1666, Newton expressed his views on his three laws of motion.

Both Rene Descartes, Herman von Helmholtz and Wilhelm Wundt played an important role in the creation of psychology, transcending the thought process at that time and expanding knowledge. They did not see the world like everyone else, and they did not answer "no." These great thinkers have been separated for decades for centuries, but their theories combine and conflict with new psychology. Reneekecart is an important step towards the birth of psychology. Descartes was a philosopher born in France in 1596. The birth of actual psychology and the birth of traditional psychology were established habitually by William Vonte in Leipzig's first university laboratory between 1878 and 1879. Vonte (1832-1920) is probably the most prolific writer in this field. His writings have a huge impact on the formation of psychology in Europe, the United Kingdom, and the United States, and emphasize experimental ones rather than an ethical (naturalistic) quest model. But Vonte's interpretation is fairly selective. In his less advisory multivolume Völkerpsychologie (the best presentation of "Anthropological Psychology") he developed and defended the nonexperimental and fundamental historical anthropological mission of psychology It was. . Even from this broader perspective Vonte remains loyal to his medical education and the scientific point of view of his era when he helped the great Herman von Helmholtz. The birth of European sports psychology occurred mainly in Germany. The first sports psychology laboratory was founded in Berlin by Dr. Carl Diem in the early 1920s. In the early stages of sports psychology Robert Werner Schulte founded the German Sports Academy in 1920. Lab measured physical fitness and ability in sports, and in 1921, Schurte presented the body and spirit. In sports. Sports psychology experiment began in Russia in 1925 with the Sports Academy of Moscow and Leningrad, and the official sports psychology department was established around 1930. With the creation of a sports academy where sports psychologists play an important role, advances in sports psychology are becoming more cautious in the Soviet Union and eastern countries. In the latter part of the nineteenth century, compulsory research and human motivation and ability measurement appeared along with the birth of the concept of industrial organization psychology (industry / organizational psychology, nd). Industrial organization psychology, apparently known as I / O psychology, is an extension of psychology applying psychology theory and organizational principle (Cherry, n.d.). - Introduction When studying the ancient roots of international psychology, I learned that I am particularly interested in the ancient roots of Greek, Chinese and Indian psychology. In this study, I noticed that I read the statement I read while reading the hypothesis about psychology.

On the day Galileo came out of our world, Sir Isaac Newton was already pointing his life for him. Sir Isaac Newton was born in Woolthorp on December 25, 1642. Before his birth, his father died, he tasted the odor and presence of his mother Hanna. Nevertheless, when he was three years old, the marriage married other people, abandoned him under the care of his grandmother, destroyed him and stimulated his foundation. He received basic or primary education until he was twelve years old, and then he began attending the King's School of Grantham. Sir Isaac Newton was born on Woolthorp Estate in England on December 25, 1642. He was born too early and is a child. His mother said that he was too young, he can fit in the rhetoric pot. Sir Isaac Newton was born three months after his father died. When Sir Isaac Newton was three years old, the mother remarried to the pastor Barnabas Smith. Sir Isaac Newton stayed in the care of his grandmother. From 12 years old to 17 years old, he received education at the King Grantham School. Sir Isaac Newton (1642-1727), a mathematician and physicist, was one of the best scientists ever. Sir Isaac Newton was born on Wool Soap, a farm of Lincolnshire on January 4 (December 25 calendar). Woolsthorpe is the place he studied optical theory and optical theory. It is also considered to be the place where Newton observed that Apple fell from the tree and encouraged him to formulate his law of gravity. He entered the University of Cambridge in 1661; he was elected a member of the Trinity College in 1667 and was elected Professor Lucas Mathematics in 1669. He stayed at the university and lectured most of the time until 1696. During these Cambridge times he was at the top of creativity and he picked 1665-1666 as "the golden age of my invention". Though it was not published until 1687, he prepared a Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica, commonly known as Principia, with intense spiritual work for a couple of years. Isaac Newton entered the Cambridge Trinity College under the emergency of his uncle William Ayscough ("Newton, Sir Isak", Encyclopedia of Mathematics Biography, 394). Newton studied law at Cambridge, but the results were very different. When Newton was at the university, the school's philosophy dominated Aristotle's philosophy. Later, he became more generous at the university third grader, so he started studying the philosophy of Descartes, Galsendi and Boyle. Viete, Descartes, Wallis 'new analytic geometry, and Galileo' s Copernican astronomy dynamics also fascinated him. When Barro arrived in Cambridge's Lucasian chair ("Jazz Isaac Newton", ONLINE), Newton's talent began to grow. Isaac Barrow began to recognize him, soon he became a mentor of Isaac Newton. Under the direction of Isaac Barrow, Isaac Newton began to show his great wisdom. Isaac Newton received a math scholarship!

Utilitarians face many problems because he lost the ability to live a personal life. This means that Utilitarians must consider the steps leading to the highest level of charity in society when making decisions. Utilitarianism brings the greatest benefit to most people. Two main aspects of Utilitarian rule it. The principle of result - based explanation explains that you must consider the subsequent results when judging the correctness or mistake of an action. For discussions between Utilitarians and dentists see JJC Smart and Bernard Williams published in 1973, "Utilitarianism: For and Against" and Samuel Schaeffler's 1988 results collection. Doctrine and its critics. Ethics textbooks and readers need to provide appropriate explanation of the contrast between these two important ethical theories. Finally, virtue ethics can be traced back to the era of an ancient philosopher Plato (429 - 347 BC). Ethical work is Nicoma's morality (publication date of ancient works is unknown). Modern virtue ethicists include Philippa Foot, Michael Slote and Julia Annas. Bernard Williams (1929-2003) played an important role in philosophy ethics in the second half of the 20th century. He refused to organize the moral code into a moral theory, that is, the view that philosophical thought to Cantianism and (most importantly) utilitarianism and other ethics is indispensable. It was caught by theory. He is also an important contributor to moral psychology, personal identity, equality, moral and emotional discussion, and to the interpretation of philosophers such as Wittgenstein, Nietzsche, Descartes, Aristotle and Plato It is also an important contributor.

Knowing famous mathematicians, their wonderful work will help change the field of mathematics and the world we live in today Please enjoy various facts and information on brilliant mathematicians such as Pythagoras, Euclid, Pierre Fayma, Blais Pascal, Leon Hadra, Karl Friedrich Gauss, Allan etc. Turing and others. Read what they do when they do and enjoy the learning of the most famous mathematicians ever. Greek philosopher and mathematician Pythagoras lived around 500 BC and is known for his Pythagorean theorem. It contains three sides of a right triangle. a2 + b2 = c2 Greek mathematician Euclid is often referred to as "father of geometry" because of his revolutionary idea and a powerful textbook "element" written around 300 BC. Archimedes of Syracuse lived around 250 BC, in addition to developing a method to determine the volume of an irregularly shaped object. Italian mathematician Leonardo (aka Fibonacci) in Pisa lived today, the most famous Fibonacci number between 1170 and 1250. Fibonacci introduced a digital sequence to Western Europe after mathematicians in India have previously written their book "Liber Abaci". In the 17th century, Galileo Galilei and Johannes Kepler discovered important discoveries related to planet movements and orbits. German mathematician Gottfried Leibniz lived between 1646 and 1716 and developed important calculus concepts and mathematical symbolic practices. Isaac Newton discovered the laws of physics and summarized many important concepts of infinitesimal calculus Most of the work done by Leibniz and Newton is based on the theory of French philosopher Rene Descartes. In addition to his many contributions to philosophy, Descartes has tremendous impact on mathematics, the creation of analytical geometry, the development of systems that use algebra to describe geometry, contributions to optics, etc. It was. French born Pierre de Fermat is an amateur mathematician known for Fermat's last theorem. Swiss mathematician Leonhard Euler was probably the most influential mathematician of the 18th century and discovered and introduced many contemporary mathematical terms and symbols in graph theory. German mathematician Carl Friedrich Gauss was born in 1777 and made an outstanding contribution in geometry, statistics, number theory, algebra and so on. Bernhard Riemann is an influential German mathematician who contributes to differential geometry and analysis and paves the way for Albert Einstein's general relativity theory. Emmy Noether, born in 1882, was a German mathematician who made an important contribution to abstract algebra and theoretical physics, explained by Einstein as the most important woman in mathematical history. Alan Turing solved the German code (code) in World War II, contributed to mathematical logic, and played a role in the development of algorithms, artificial intelligence and modern computers UK mathematicians and computer science It is a person. Important role A historical mathematician on the American list will help answer "Who is an American mathematician?" And "Who is America's most famous mathematician?" They all have in common, that is, they are all respected as American mathematicians. A list of famous or famous mathematicians from the USA, including living creatures and photographs, such as famous mathematicians born in the United States, popular mathematicians who emigrated to the United States. If you want to know the name of a famous American mathematician, this list is your best resource. These mathematicians are one of the best people in their field and contain information about all the famous American mathematicians. A prominent mathematician: The author of this book explains 60 famous mathematicians born between 1700 and 1910 and provides insight about their outstanding lives and their contribution to mathematics did. This article is chronologically ordered to provide interesting information about mathematicians

The importance of educational experience was always the subject of philosophical debate. These discussions between empiricists and rationalists have been on for a while. Rationalists believe that the knowledge gained through sensation can not be trusted, learning can only be accomplished through reasoning. On the other hand, experientists believe that knowledge can be obtained through empirical impressions and concepts that can not be learned without experience (Evans, 1992, p. 35). However, Kant solves this argument and believes that experience and reason are necessary conditions for learning. Empiricism and rationalism: Experiences are related to British enlightenment philosophers including John Rock, George Berkeley, Hume. Experiences believe that all human knowledge comes from sensory and sensory experiences. According to New Orleans of the University of Loyola, a rationalist who lives mainly on the European continent believes that the sensation is not reliable, and that knowledge is brought about through thought, or ideas and intuitional thought. John Comenius (1592 - 1670) is an excellent intellectual who supports universal education and practical education. He played an important role in introducing picture books written in their own languages, not Latin. He advocates development of lifelong learning and logical thinking, not memorization. He wants to educate women and poor children John Rock (1632-1704) was the first person in the classic English classics. These philosophers are skeptical of rationalistic metaphysics, in particular abuse of speculation, epistemology based on congenital concepts. Explain all natural knowledge of human knowledge without reference, and his theory is simpler and better than Descartes' theory. - To live in society based on the social contract we signed, the government and artificial law is definitely a strong defender of the treaty itself. They will benefit the citizens and protect the country's safety. Nonetheless, they should not be the only reasons for justice, it should not be a precondition for justice. In Kant 's epistemology the two conflicting camps were rationalists and empiricists. Rationalists led by Rene Descartes believe in a priori reasoning. Thinking of a series of assumptions, what can you infer? On the other hand, Hume and the empiricist. Camp learns from experience or prioritize reasoning after reasoning. So far, the neural network was empirical. Let's see a lot of data and draw conclusions from there. There are more theories behind other machine learning methods, but they still tend to be based on empiricism. Without data, they are nothing. Professor Pedro Domingos of the University of Washington changed the analogy of machine learning to a scientific method. Hypothesize and collect some data. Optimize assumptions and repeat

British soldiers who died in the war have more conflicts than other British empires. In the best situation, this is a tough burden. In addition, the way of fighting breaks all romantic aristocrats and the notion of courageous war - neither aristocratic nor brave nor war nor courage. Lady Dalloway of Virginia Woolf is a novel about the atrocity of slow trauma and the inability to face reality. Most of this emotion came from useless struggle of Septimus Smith who is a mentally disabled who came back from the Western Front. Ron Smith: John Frederick Nimes said: "The sense of humor is proportional sense." Despite the strength of the encouragement power of poetry, my book loses their common sense and its proportional sense It is not desirable. In addition, when I was reading a new poem, I actually did not consider the meaning when I was writing a new poem. I am thinking about that effect. Is this image or this line broken, or what is this rhyme doing for the reader? Humor is a device that allows me to surprise good readers and divert their attention. It is also indispensable for a healthy life. Everyone needs one fun thing everyday. Sir William's "proportionality" involves refusing to see the human value he requires as being inconsistent with the national value of his servant and the authority he maintains. His proportional sense is the acceptance of hypocrisy, the inevitable disconnection of personal value and public value, and a barbarous attack on those who reveal this break and overcome it. Sir William's sense of equilibrium is the acceptance of the necessity of self-destruction, but the reason that Septimus is a heroic satire is that he refuses to accept this division and death to maintain his unity of unity Because I have an intention to accept. "Beauty has a place of right proportions because sensations like the proportions like the proportions like proportions." This theory is not essentially an Aristo. Dotadologist, Pythagoreanism and Platonism also understand emotions, or at least perfect form. In fact, the fusion of different philosophical traditions in this basic point is the reason to think. In other words, whatever Descartes reads or does not read, the doctrine can not be what he does not know. (In particular, since the doctrine is the main content of traditional music theory, it shows that Descartes is not just a past acquaintance.) Plato's work, in particular the Republic and Timmouth show the proportional structure of the universe It is.

When the light of the sun refracts through a small raindrop falling into the air, a rainbow is formed. The rainbow needs a lot of light from the sun or the moon and spherical raindrops formed in the atmosphere. Rainbows can be compared with mini prisms. The light is refracted ("bends as light passes from one medium to another"), which separates white light of different wavelength (or color). Whether these wavelengths of light pass through raindrops or reflections depends on the angle at which the light illuminates the backside of the raindrop. Dear, the lunar eclipse is just one of many miraculous miracles in our life experience on the earth. Rainbow is another kind of rainbow. Because the rainbow is a manifestation of the interaction between light and matter, the rainbow is generated by the interaction of the light waves with the particles of water within the angle of 42 degrees specified by the observer. We also experienced the natural wonders of thunder and lightning. Lightning is a hearing experience caused by the expansion of the air near the lightning bolt, "sudden electrostatic discharge occurring during the storm." Even if she assumes her new role as a planet of the five-dimensional creator, the experience of Mother Earth in supporting all natural phenomena in our lives has not changed! So, what is unusual about "American meals?" Physically, a rainbow appears after the empty storm. It is made up of 7 different colors. Once it is bowed, its shape can be thought of as part of a perfect circle. From the physical size of the rainbow, Shange proposes other qualities appropriate to the liquidity and logic of her dance movement. It seems like a simple natural phenomenon which seems to be natural, but Shanges choreopoem uses rainbow as a complex image to predict changes in weather and changes in life of "colored girls". This is a good question, we are beginning to consider the physical process of generating a rainbow. When you face a rainbow, most people never notice that the sun is always behind you, and the center of the rainbow arc is opposite to the direction of the sun. Of course, rain is in the direction of the rainbow. Such questions require appropriate physical answers. I will explain the formation of a rainbow of raindrops. This was an optical problem, first discussed clearly by René Descartes in 1637. An interesting history can be found in Carl Boyer's book "The myth to rainbow to mathematics". Descartes simplifies the study of the rainbow and simplifies it to the study of the interaction between water droplets and the light hit by it.

Please imagine the sky full of dark and fluffy clouds. The air is damp and sticky, and raindrops begin to fall. Soon the waterdrop turned into rain. And because you have finished outdoor fun, you became sad. But as you turn around, you feel the sun from the clouds and warm your back. You understand that the rain and the sun are equal to the rainbow, so a smile will appear on your face. You looked at the sky and saw the rainbow. When you look at it, the problem begins to emerge. What is a rainbow? Physically, a rainbow appears after the empty storm. It is made up of 7 different colors. Once it is bowed, its shape can be thought of as part of a perfect circle. From the physical size of the rainbow, Shange proposes other qualities appropriate to the liquidity and logic of her dance movement. It seems like a simple natural phenomenon which seems to be natural, but Shanges choreopoem uses rainbow as a complex image to predict changes in weather and changes in life of "colored girls". This is a good question, we are beginning to consider the physical process of generating a rainbow. When you face a rainbow, most people never notice that the sun is always behind you, and the center of the rainbow arc is opposite to the direction of the sun. Of course, rain is in the direction of the rainbow. Such questions require appropriate physical answers. I will explain the formation of a rainbow of raindrops. This was an optical problem, first discussed clearly by René Descartes in 1637. An interesting history can be found in Carl Boyer's book "The myth to rainbow to mathematics". Descartes simplifies the study of the rainbow and simplifies it to the study of the interaction between water droplets and the light hit by it. Dear, the lunar eclipse is just one of many miraculous miracles in our life experience on the earth. Rainbow is another kind of rainbow. Because the rainbow is a manifestation of the interaction between light and matter, the rainbow is generated by the interaction of the light waves with the particles of water within the angle of 42 degrees specified by the observer. We also experienced the natural wonders of thunder and lightning. Lightning is a hearing experience caused by the expansion of the air near the lightning bolt, "sudden electrostatic discharge occurring during the storm." Even if she assumes her new role as a planet of the five-dimensional creator, the experience of Mother Earth in supporting all natural phenomena in our lives has not changed! So, what is unusual about "American meals?"

Views on human reasons The human reasons are definitely topics that can have multiple perspectives from different individuals. Descartes believes that reason is the ultimate cornerstone of human knowledge, and Pascal believes that rationality alone can not allow someone to gain knowledge. He feels the reason is limited. Both of them will do their best to support their own ideas and show their views to others. Descartes believes in feeling and believes that people can only understand things through the content of thinking by human reason. The theology of Ash'ari was founded by Abu al-Hasan al-Ash'ari. Ash'ari theology highlights various ideas, but the most obvious is God's revelation for human reasons. As described in the Qur'an, the human reason can not develop morality, which is entirely derived from the command of God. This theology also explains the sacred almighty that transcends the human will's free will. In Ashari, the Qur'an is believed to be eternal and not created. Basically, the teaching of Assuri's theology says that the content of the Quran on God should be understood directly as the truth, even though certain kinds of statements can not be perfectly conceptualized. Aristotle believes that human function is a reasonable life; this is the best and most unique of all human activities. 'Distribution is the real self of all men' because it is the best part. The reason is, in the highest sense, the person's self. Therefore, humans achieve the ultimate goal by rationally obeying. Aquinas has developed his idea of ​​Aristotle's human purpose into his own idea; he believes he is a Christian and hence human beings will be created in the "image of God". It is perfect. This is a comprehensive development of the image of God in us, therefore it is consistent with God. But we can not achieve this perfection on the earth, it will be perfect in the afterlife, so we have to work hard to achieve this goal on the planet. We divide the truth God admits into two categories. Some of the truth to God goes beyond all power of human reasons, like God to three and one. Even human reasoning can reach other things such as the existence and unity of God and philosophers proved this under the guidance of the light of natural reason. The first type of truth that can only be obtained by reason is the one that he calls faith assumption, including the truth of the existence of God and the truth of God. The second type of truth is called a mystery of faith, can only be obtained by faith, and contains the trinity doctrine. In our current life, "knowledge and understanding starts with sense", he believes that only human reason can not get these truths (ibid).

Beginning with Copernicus, Galileo, Newton, the image of the modern Western emphasizes scientific thinking and reasoning. The scientific revolution has created a new age of thinking in which ideas are observed. This includes what humans can prove through emotion, not religion or superstition. Philosophers and scientists such as famous Greek historians, Thucydides, Socrates, Aristotle, Hippocrates and others gave birth to contemporary Western thought. Ancient Greek writer who showed the objectivity of modern science was Thucydides. Evidence to prove the evidence of contemporary Western thought, observation, critical thinking, logical thinking, and exhibitions and exhibitions is directly influenced by works of many famous ancient Greeks. Contributions to the fields of medicine, science, history and philosophy are still appreciated today. Their approaches to problem solving, the development of reactions and certification points are revolutionary, and although slight modifications have been done, they are still in use today. This shows that the species of contemporary Western thought and intellectual effort exist in the thought of ancient Greeks. Ancient Greek philosophers played an important role not only in the formation of Western philosophical traditions but also in the formation of modern philosophical ideas. Many philosophers and other theorists today acknowledge that the ancient Greek philosophy has shaped the whole of Western thought for centuries (Barnes 5). But according to this article, the reason and the quest for evidence were not initiated by the ancient Greeks, but the former Socratic philosophers decided the basic standards that can be used in the process to explain the entire universe I tried hard to make it. Significant advances have been made in important areas of geometry, logic and science. This paper discusses the pioneering work of ancient Greek philosophers and the influence of thought on modern thought. Just after the scientific revolution began (16th and 17th centuries), we can divide contemporary Western philosophical thinking into three gentle and overlapping periods. Early modern philosophy, late modern philosophy, and modern philosophy (most of which can be called "anti") philosophy)). The early modern philosophy began with French rationalist Rene Descartes (1596-1650) and British political philosopher Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679). Descartes is aware of the diversity of beliefs and ideas found throughout the world at the beginning of the exploration and is seeking a new foundation for universally applicable knowledge - the premise of the main sequence of Western thought At least we can go back to Plato. He said that he found it in the famous Cogito ("Yes, I am.").

Pythagoras is not only considered to be one of the greatest mathematicians in history but is also considered to be his work on discovery made by music, philosophy, astrology, and many other people I will. One of the biggest discoveries of Pythagoras is to discover the scales used today. This scale is based on the principle of all Pythagoran ideological foundations: there are numbers in every aspect of existence. Philosophical belief for universal creation based on perfect harmony between numbers and nature. Pythagoras believes that the principle of "digital" or mathematics is the principle of giving the world order, harmony, rhythm, beauty. This harmony is well-balanced between the universe and the soul. For Pythagoras, "number" is not an abstract concept, it is an entity embodied with norms, the universe, and wise natural objects. The mathematical order in biology is perceived through the sense of the soul, not through the physical meaning. Unlike the concept of contemporary mathematical movement, Pythagoras believes that mathematics is a way of releasing the soul from the bondage of the body's sensation, basically a religious training. For Pythagoras, the soul is immortal, and cultivation of the soul is achieved through research of truth and ascetic life. Aristotle pointed out that Pythagoras is the first person raising the issue of "virtue" in philosophy (DK.58 B 4) Among Greek philosophers, there is a harmonious theorist, Pythagoras' disciple. They say that the harmony of the koto is very beautiful and complicated, but it depends on whether it exists in certain trees or strings. They say that the soul resembles the harmony of the koto. The soul is very beautiful and complicated, but it depends on its physical existence. Their view, the theory of harmony is inconsistent with Descartes' conclusions about the metaphysical clarity of the mind and body. The modern mind theory tends to be more common with this theory of this ancient soul than Descartes dualism.

Interactionism is a binaryist position in the philosophy of the heart, which (1) thought and body are separated, (2) they believe there is causal interaction between them. Descartes is a materialistic dualist who believes that there is a causal relationship between the dialogueist, thought and body. However, when interaction and material dualism are combined, nonphysical entities that do not spread to the physical world can cause changes in the body and how they can change nonverbal, emotional or emotional health Cause it? Descartes thought that the pineal gland of the brain might be a connection between the soul and the body, but then gave up the thought and acknowledged that he did not answer the question. Other believers in the Descartes tradition later believed that the causal relationship between the body and the mind was an opportunity for God's intervention - an obvious causal relationship was not direct, but the hand of God is a material world It was the real cause of action in. Let me give an example of the comparison mechanism and the interaction of mutual interaction interactions (the influence between people, situation, action). Let me give an example of a mechanical interaction: characteristics, situation, and relationship between context and characteristics. Do you support another viewpoint? Please explain the reason. Please post a response of 200 to 300 words below: Do you think this event changed personality? If it changes your character, how will your personality change? What if that event does not change your personality? Do you think your character depends on environmental impact and genetic influence? The dialogueist view recognizes that the influence of personality depends on the circumstances and the situation is affected by the personality of the existent person. Interactivity also recognizes that people often choose circumstances that reflect their personality. Allan R. Buss, one of many interactive researchers, introduced the idea that people and the situation interact in three different ways. A common example of the interaction between people and the situation is the Stanford Prison Experiment where university students participated. Study on simulation research In the prison environment, some students work as guards and other students work as prisoners. When the security guard became more insulting than expected, the study was over. Because interaction theory is used to study social interactions between different members, the interaction theory is linked to the family system. Based on the theory of interaction theory, families are simply units of personality interaction. Communication, personality, and role play an important role in the family of social systems. Communication plays an important role in the interaction between different members of the family. Since families tend to act based on the meaning of words used for communication, the way the family communicates determines the interaction between them.

The existence of God Our so-called religious experience may be very different. Several reports on supernatural phenomena are difficult to explain from a rational and scientific point of view. On the other hand, there are various testimonies that seem to convey emotions and some kind of peace - this is something most of us may relate to religious or not. First, I consider the essence of experience. Experience includes experience (by sensory test). Discussion of Rene Descartes on the existence of God Rene Descartes's debate about the existence of God is related to his rationalistic deduction reasoning. Descartes concluded that the truth about the existence of God exists in His idea about the completeness of God and the essence of God (as a complete existence that must exist to be perfect). - All moral arguments about the existence of God are based on the principle that all of us share common sense of morality. Despite cultural differences, in a broad sense, people all over the world have ambiguous thoughts about right and wrong; a moral argument to the existence of God is that this mutual understanding is evidence of the existence of God I will say that. Immanuel Kant advocated this argument (not a moral argument); a god as a source of objective morality Before attempting to explain and evaluate the moral argument about God's existence, it is beneficial to understand the purpose of God's existential argument. Of course, though the views on this are diverse, most contemporary supporters do not believe that theoretical arguments are "proof". They should provide effective arguments and prerequisites that reasonable people can not deny. Such success criterion obviously sets high criteria for success and supporters of the argument of the writer can hardly meet philosophical discussions of interesting conclusions in areas other than formal logic such criteria Correctly point out. Is the premise of these arguments reasonable, at least for reasonable people, more reasonable than rejection?

Elements of Newtonian philosophy through Voltaire. In this article published in 1738, Voltaire explained not only Newton's philosophy, but also most of it. Descartes' contribution to the field of philosophy. In a brief explanation of Voltaire on geometry Newton and related philosopher's paradigm in the field of astronomy and physics, he applied geometry through graphs and photographs and proved his remarks by calculus did. That name is influenced by Voltaire 's "philosophical element of Newton" in 1738. Voltaire used Newton science as a carrier of the transformation and wrote elements for transforming French to Newton who gained enlightenment from backward Descartes. We believe that historical and technical understanding in the market is not fully understood. We began making newsletters reporting weekly on the innovations occurring in the world changing game rules. Our goal is to show information that we normally do not care to help our readers and customers become intelligent foresight and to help make changes to future results. In the fall of 1735, Francesco algarotti visited Voltaire and he was creating a book about Newton in Italy. Inspired by this visit, Marquise was partially translated into Newtonian Latin principles, but still became the last French translation of the 21st century. Both her and Voltaire are interested in Newton's contemporary and competitive philosophy of Gottfried Leibniz. Voltaire remained firmly Newton, but Marquees adopted several aspects of Leibniz against Newton. Voltaire's own work "Newtonian philosophical element" (Newton's philosophical element) enabled Newton to be accepted and understood by more people and Marquise wrote a celebration comment on "Diary". Voltaire's research universally accepts Newton's French optics and gravity theory universally.

In order for a rocket to fly, some basic physical rules must be followed. It can not escape from the basic rule that the center of gravity must be before the pressure center. The center of gravity center of gravity or Cg is expressed as if all masses are concentrated on that point. Simply put, you can balance rockets with your fingers. Cg is also the point where the rocket rotates. This is very important for the stability of the rocket, you will see it soon. "I tend to handle things from a physical framework," Musk said in an interview. "Physics teaches you from the first principle, not analogy, so let's look at the first principle: What is a rocket? In addition to aerospace grade aluminum alloys, some Titanium, Copper and Carbon Fiber. Then I am Q. What is the value of these materials in the Commodity Market? We can see that the material cost of rockets is about 2% of regular price theoretically, In principle, we need to deeply deeply understand the basics of the situation deeply: René Descartes, a French philosopher and scientist, now adopts a method called Descartes skepticism to accept this method Everything is suspected until I leave a purely doubtless truth he sees. " Fiorello Bodini woke up at night and went out to listen to rockets flying to Martian, Saturn, and Venus rockets. He is a crap dealer, but his family succeeded in saving enough money to get on the rocket. The acquaintance tells him that he is going to fail, the rest of his family is indignant no matter where he goes. His children are excited about this possibility The rocket consists of thousands of complicated and complex parts. Rockets need to concentrate so that the whole team fly properly for each subsystem. And usually it will not work. In the past few weeks there was a pre-flight checklist, which took many years to assemble individual rockets. Given the inherent complexity of rocket launch, the 95.43% US launch rate is strange. Excellent scientists and engineers manufacturing rockets are most cautious and must understand the most intimate details of these huge machines.

Since Descartes, each of us finally got our idea. That is a common philosophical principle. This principle means that an individual can handle his inner thought in ways other people can not. Descartes is confident of his belief in privilege acquisition, but there is still a suspicion that humans have this ability. As an individualist, I firmly believe in human power for our thoughts. There are situations where there is a possibility of mistaking our own idea, but we can not deny the acquisition of our own idea of ​​privilege. To prove the authenticity of our privileged access, I use some Watching my son playing AR technology, I think that many ways my son found meaning in the world are shaped by the technology he was entitled to. How can children who can not acquire AR participate in education in the coming years? If the relationship between information and understanding is expanded by AR, what will happen to those who can not access that technology? The AR toy for children can be bought cheaply, but the use of AR technology relies on access to hardware compatible with Internet connection. Perhaps the AR may not allow us to be more closely, but it pushes people further like many previous technologies: platform, software, application access and access to the Internet divide. AR may encourage subdivision of meaning by enclosing the information garden Therefore, we can access most of the same information. Regarding information access, the world is flat. The most noticeable difference lies in our personal search function, Internet connectivity, time, wit, and typing abilities. You share a well-formed, stupid long list. Only what we need, what I want, what I can offer. What is the most important thing? What are you thinking? We are reading your work, applause, appreciation and crazy comments. When we understand that you are doing nothing, we are your praise and pleasure. To make matters worse, if you rely on assistants, friends, and other poor people to make a list for you, you can post it with your own name. Then you need a solid list of your own

God exists in reality as well as understanding. According to Anselm, God "there is nothing bigger than imaginable" (Anselm 29). According to this concept, God can not simply exist in understanding. Because it preserves the possibility of being bigger than God, that is, those who exist in reality and understanding. Anselm's conclusion is that the only thing that does not exist is (in fact) not believable, that is, no more bigger things can be considered, only God applies to this description (Anselm 28). If God does not exist, God can not be bigger than any other imagined person. So, if you think that God exists in advance, your argument is justified and if the problem of God's existence is not solved it can not be used as an argument to support God's existence. If it turn out that God does not exist, I will be bigger than a god that does not exist. There is much debate about the existence of God about the existence of God. For a long time everyone wanted to prove the existence of God. Some people think that God exists and is proved by many philosophical or scientific foundations and religious reasons. On the other hand, others do not believe in the existence of God, and their foundation is proved from many theoretical and scientific point of view. Many people try to prove the existence of God with reason. After Descartes proves its existence, people will consider the truth about the essence of God, evidence of the existence of God, and the nature of material objects. The main task in Descartes' meditation is to design a system that allows him to understand the truth. He wants to lay the foundation of all further philosophy

The earth rotates about the axis. The earth must go once (more than a day). This axis points somewhere in the space. The axis does not move (almost). At the same time, the earth rotates around the sun. It will take about a year more than a year. The (most) plane of the Earth's trajectory does not move. The axis of rotation of the earth's day-to-day rotation is not perpendicular to the plane of the Earth's orbit. It is tilted 23.4 degrees. The tilt angle does not change (almost). From the north of the celestial body, the movement of the earth seems to be running counterclockwise around the sun. Together with its axial tilt - that is, the inclination of the Ecliptic plane in the direction of the Earth 's axis - it is 23.439 ° - which causes seasonal fluctuations. In addition to creating a change in temperature, this also brings about a change in the amount of solar radiation that the hemisphere undergoes in that year. Basically, when the Arctic is pointing to the sun, the northern hemisphere passes through the summer and the southern hemisphere goes through the winter. During the summer, the climate becomes warmer, the sun will appear in the dawn sky, it will be in the evening. The climate becomes cooler in winter, the day becomes shorter, the sunrise becomes slower and the sunset becomes faster. The rotation of the earth, the rotation of the sun around the sun, the Milky Way moves toward Andromeda Galaxy. The population of the area is attracted to high density areas and is repelled by low density areas. The numbers indicate the speed at which we actually cross the universe at a certain moment. Total momentum in a particular direction reaches 368 km / s, which is plus or minus approximately 30 km / s, depending on the year of the year and the direction of the movement of the earth. Cosmic microwave background measurements confirm this, the cosmic microwave background seems hotter in the direction we move, and it is preferable that it is cooler in the opposite direction of our movement. 30 Descartes, according to Cartesian physics when the earth moves around the sun, since the momentum is considered to be scalar, the momentum does not change - the earth changes its direction of motion only, the momentum changes do not do. Therefore, Descartes is not aware of this fundamental problem - it must convey tremendous power between the Earth and fine material vortices. According to Descartes, when the body maintains its state of motion, the movement of the body consists of a part of the uniform linear motion that is separated by collision, that is, by a unique event during which the body undergoes a state change . The singular event here means an event that happens instantaneously, that is, at a certain point in time. This results in a rate of change of momentum and a rate of change of all other temporal characteristics of the infinite body.

Dialogue and monologue in the lyrical song of 1798, in commemoration of the 200th anniversary of the lyrical song of 1798, it means volume innovation and continuity. It is no longer impossible to believe that "romanticism" has started here (because I taught at least at school). 1798 can not be claimed as a turning point of literary history, but there are some interesting things about controversial facts about the attitude of the novel to the novel and the permanent importance of the reader of the poem in the romantic era Yes. Romanticism officially began in 1798 when William Wordsworth and Samuel Taylor Colleric announced anonymous lyrics. This work shows the official beginning of the literary era that started early in 1798. The work must include what is called "romantic": love for the past, sympathy for children's thoughts Dialogue and monologue in the lyrical song of 1798, in commemoration of the 200th anniversary of the lyrical song of 1798, it means volume innovation and continuity. It is no longer impossible to believe that "romanticism" has started here (because I taught at least at school). - Rene Descartes and Thomas Hobbes: Dialogue When people start an incredible journey through meditation in Descartes, there are many doubts, criticisms and seemingly fundamental problems and will interfere with people. progress Please teach the poet William Wordsworth before deeply digging in "I am in a lonely cloud". In 1798, Washington announced a series called "Sentimental Song" with Samuel Taylor Collick. Romantic literature has emotional expressions and lyrics, centered on the relationship between human beings and the natural world. Let's start analyzing this poem. Let's open our eyes and see all the images and themes that we encounter. The term "image" includes the word "image", but it does not simply refer to the language that forms the image in the mind of the reader. Briefly, images are languages ​​that stimulate senses (visual, auditory, taste, smell, even tactile). Furthermore, when we search for themes in poetry, we are just looking for ideas, emotions, and ideas that combine verses.

Does God exist? People have asked this question for centuries. Christians, Jews, and Muslims all say that God exists. They will claim he is all creator and taller than people. Others would argue that God does not exist, or that God is not a Christian, as Jews and Muslims have said. Both Anselm and Aquinas mentioned this issue: Anselm of his "Proslogion" and Aquinas of his "Summa Theologica". Anselm and Aquinas have the same view on the essence of God, but Anselm lacks evidence to support his argument. The existence of the god of Anselm rejects the refusal of the existence of the god of Anselm, and if the only evidence of the existence of God is Akinus's five ways and anselm's ontological argument, as Anselm offers Seem. The best reasoning I am not saying that Anselm 's view is better or even effective, but in view of the proof of Aquinas and Anselm, Anselm' s view is better. Indeed, Anselm believes that the existence of God is based on the concept of God. He goes through discussion ... there are many arguments about the existence of God to try to prove the existence of God. In this article we will discuss ontological discussions, cosmological arguments, empirical discussions, such as avoiding errors and design arguments. There is much criticism about each of these, and the existence of God can not prove that it might be stronger than those who speak more strongly. The definition of God arguing is a God of Christians. Thomas Aquinas objected to Anselm 's argument when presenting five evidences about the existence of God in his Summa Theologica. He believes that people can not understand the nature of God and hence can not imagine God as proposed by Anselm. Existential arguments are meaningful only to those who fully understand the essence of God. Aquinas believes that only God can fully understand its essence and that only he can use this argument. His refusal of ontological debate has caused other Catholic theologians to reject this argument. The "trivial" proof of Thomas Aquinas helps to better understand ontological arguments. In the original ontological argument, Ansell regards existence as one of the essence of God, but Aquinas rejects it. Because we do not know the essence of God. Here he separates the essence from existence. Ansem emphasizes in his ontological argument that ontology is the same as essence. Descartes is "father of rationalism". For him, knowledge can only be obtained through reason, rather than sensory experience. The standard of truth is the "clear and clear" standard. Descartes derived God 's existence from his concept of innate concept. This means that we have created some natural ideas in this world. One of the ideas is a thought of perfect existence. Descartes said that we are limited and incomplete. How can we get a perfect existence? He explained that these ideas were directly embedded in God by our mind. Therefore, we are born with some natural ideas. This shows the existence of God

Peter Unger thinks certainty is necessary for all knowledge. Furthermore, because he insisted that there was no certain thing, he concluded that "nobody knows such things" (Unger, 42). This is Angler's claim. "If someone knows something is like this one can absolutely be sure that it is" (42). "Everyone can never confirm that something is the same" (43). Therefore, "[n] obody knows that everything is the same" (43). I know everything. "I think that everyone should not be convinced of something, if you are convinced, there is nothing to be sure about, so you should be wrong ... ... people are in real life There is the possibility of taking action and the philosophy must encourage people to be fully animated without conviction. "Experiencing a failure is a crack of the existing structure that becomes a correct digestion and blessing It's a moment of failure. It should make this lurking, continuous mind threat aware of the freedom that exists in us. When there is no reason, we cause a miracle. Please be aware that this will give us some dignity One reason is simple, but the question "If something is certain" is an interesting question. We live in a world with different perspectives, opinions and theories about many problems. In many cases these views are held confidently, but as new scientific discoveries develop, knowledge transfer and new theories are designed. Have you asked yourself whether there really is a problem? Or may people change living in uncertainty with guidance from the opinion of the popular 'expert' of that day tomorrow? Do you have any ideas you can check to overcome your ideas? René Descartes of the 16th century philosopher and mathematician was dissatisfied with this prospect. I will try to analyze Descartes' first, second and sixth meditations.

Beckett, an absurd character of Beckett, does not observe or express irrational problems in any form of philosophical theory (never once wrote philosophical papers such as Camus and Sartre) , His expression was completely dramatic. Artistic words In this chapter I analyze the living conditions discovered by Beckett's character and point out the similarity between irrational philosophical background and Beckett's artistic view. As I mentioned in the biography chapter, Beckett has read various philosophical articles; he is most interested in Descartes, Schopenhauer and Geulincx. The final result of Samuel Beckett, Clov asked, "What can I leave here?" Dialogue with "Ham replied." "In the script, Samuel Beckett dramatically showed the idea of ​​relying on interdependence between the two focuses of each person, unless others meet their physical and psychological needs Beckett accomplished this through ham, and Ham assumed his relationship with the king's identity and Kloof's theme In Endgame, the idea is that dialogue and tone between ham and crof And was built through humor. Samuel Becket's final game In the sun and laughter shelter, Samuel Beckett's terminator family has a hard time finding their own world niche. In terms of physical and emotional aspects, ham can let others surround him. Clov, the healthiest family in the body, also has the power that can not be defined late at Hamm. Ham's elderly parents, Nag and Nell have memory. Sometimes it seems weaker than others, but hum, crew, Nag and Nell have a source of power that leads to weak coexistence of family dynamics. The last conclusion of Samuel Becket emphasizes the concept of existential philosophy. Existential philosophy emphasizes the isolation of individual experiences in the uninteresting universe. It emphasizes the unexplainable and meaningless nature of human beings and emphasizes free choice. In Europe in the 1960s, the rise of absurd theaters brought a conspiracy of existentialism. The final stage mostly reflects all aspects of existentialism. In this play, Samuel Becket provides a clear and redundant expression of human emptiness.

What is the mind all in mind? What does it have to do with the body? Descartes' answer is material dualism. A person consists of an insignificant substance (spirit / soul) connected to a substance (body). However, this paper can not move the body, as it can not pass important and insignificant substances that can not move the body. I think that one person must have a mind first. This is materialistic. I will explain some of the weaknesses of this view. We are still aware of our own psychological events and we know that other people are doing similar events. Martin Heidegger, a philosopher of the 20th century, believes that subjective experiences and activities (ie "thinking") can not be understood with "substances" with "attributes" (whether the heart itself is peculiar or not Substance or not)) This is because, subjectively, the nature of qualitative experience is contradictory if it is a concept of a substance with attributes or if it is semantically imbalanced. This is a basic ontological argument. It is made from its own nature; it does not enter from the outside. The correct use of intelligence is called the natural function of human essence. One fact is the truth. The ability to do wonderful things does not mean to practice small things. Do not use your mouth to talk about the holiday all day, and you can not cultivate what you said in your mind. It is like ordinary people call themselves the king of the country. Such people are not my disciples. This first principle embodies the truth that "everything is a soul". That means the universe itself is spiritual at the underlying basic level. All phenomena of life, material, and energy in the material world are infinite, universal, living heart. This means that it exists in the fact that everything exists within the "all" idea. For the experiment it can be interpreted that this psychology universe is infinite wisdom, the field of intelligence, even the essence of consciousness itself. Create an idea dialogue and dance with the idea

Summary of Parfit, Reductionist Perspective, and Ethical Commitment: Between reasons and people, Derek Parfit insists on a simplified theory of individual identity. According to reducingists, people do not transcend the existence of certain psychological and / or physical conditions and their various relationships. With this in mind, Parfit believes that the identity of an individual includes only this more concrete fact about psychological continuity and / or relevance, so that the identity of the individual may be based on this continuity and / I think that it can be simplified to. Derek Parfit explained and explained the difference between non-minimalist and minimalist's personal identity in Parfit in 1984 (he initially put it in "simple" view and "complex" view of Parfit 1973 I divided). For the first statement of the psychological criteria of identity, see "Consistency Persistence" in 1979 by John Locke of Locke and Nedditch. For non-inductive objections, see Thomas Reid's Prose for Man and Butler's Knowledge 1736. Advocacy for Contemporary Psychology, Harold-Noonan's Identity, and 1984 Sydney Schubert's Shoe Maker's Contribution For non-reductionism of modern identity, see Swinburne's contribution. For the modern support of biological standards, see Olson 1997. Derek Parfit was one of the first contemporary theorists who explicitly explored the relationship between identity and morality from the "personal identity" that began in the early 1970s, in particular "the principle of self-and late morals". That is his remark and prospect of development. The third part of his book, Reasons and People (published in 1984), then the paper was obtained. In many respects, Parfit is a description of Rockman's personal identity despite major deviations. He is a "reductionist" and the facts about human and individual identity include more specific facts about the brain, the body, a series of interrelated psychological and physical events (Parfit 1984, 210-211). Negative reductionism is called "non-return principle". According to this doctrine, facts about human and individual identity usually include facts about Descartes' self or spirit.

Hobbes wrote many political philosophies such as the natural and political elements of the law, the philosophical basis of government and society, and the British Leviathan published in 1651. Knowing his political philosophy, his work is also very important, mainly the history of the civil war. (Sreedhar) Hobbes 'Philosophical Values: In his life, Hobbes' biography was related to political events in England and Scotland. As Hobbes is highly skeptical about the two main aspects of humanity and human judgment, we follow Hobbes' philosophy. In this article I will explain Thomas Hobbes and Descartes' political philosophy, especially their views on human science, and explain why their views prove that it is impossible to build human science . It also briefly touches upon the philosophy of human science of Donald Davidson. The theory of Hobbes and modern social biologists is trying to recognize how people work and build a society based on this foundation. - Thomas Hobbes' view of the government Thomas Hobbes declared that such controversial government is based on the rule of ordinary people within his controversial work Leviathan, for disorder and perplexation It will be connected. But before understanding Hobbes' view on the government it is important to understand the perceptions of the people of Hobbes. Thomas Hobbes and Jean-Jacques Rousseau Thomas Hobbes and Jean-Jacques Rousseau have developed a theory of humanity and how people manage themselves. Over time, the political view on the government's philosophy has gradually changed. Despite the differences Hobbes and Rousseau have become one of the most influential political theorists in the world. Their ideas and philosophies have spread all over the world and influence the establishment of many new governments. - The views of Thomas Hobbes and Jean-Jacques Rousseau on social contracts are entirely different based on the basic view on the natural state of human nature. Based on two controversial reasoning, based on two controversial reasoning, these fundamental natural human views give Hobbes and Rousseau views on the opposite aspect of the spectrum. Egoism and permanent anxiety.

Evolutionism and creative evolution theory are based on science and more detailed evidence, creationism is a belief based theory. It is by no means convincing, it is a factor influencing ideas and theory supported by scientists. Therefore, you can not truly compare one; you need to choose what you think you are the truth at the same time. Since human life began, there was a problem that bothered the greatest philosophers and scientists. Since then I have learned that the discussion is much more complicated than simple evolution and creativity. There is a series of beliefs about this problem, but the most contradictory belief has nothing to do with whether the theory of evolution is an effective theory or not. For me, I believe that discussion is not between evolution and creation, but between my own scientific and spiritual aspects, and that many people have such conflicts. Evolution theory and evolution theory explain the fact. Creationism is a myth that explains the facts. Evolutionism is proved by facts, creationism is a story about facts. It is always interesting to learn about science and religion, but it is interesting to understand that science produces facts and that all creationists (religions) can be discussed through evolution theory. Therefore evolutionists provided evidence and creationists tried many other thinkers who used scientific theories empirically inferred to challenge Galileo, Copernicus, Bacon, Descartes, and the Biblical hypothesis I will try to. . The Catholic Church called this ideology of creationism as heresy and thus has a bad habit of suppressing complete disarray of the Bible to some extent. For centuries the scientific research has evolved into the theory of big bang and evolution, although it is mainly such a place. Evolutionism and creative evolution theory are based on science and more detailed evidence, creationism is a belief based theory. It is by no means convincing, it is a factor influencing ideas and theory supported by scientists. Therefore, you can not truly compare one; you need to choose what you think you are the truth at the same time. There has been a confusing problem since the beginning of human life ... an explosion can not produce life. I believe that anyone who has seen pictures of Hiroshima and Nagasaki immediately after the other two very explosions will support me there. Through research of scientific evidence we can decide that Genesis is the only possible and provable explanation for the existence of the world and life.

PSY 360 Week 1 Personal Work Cognitive Psychology Definition Click here to purchase a tutorial Personal assignment: Cognitive Psychology Definition Paper Prepare paper from 700 to 1,050 words to define cognitive psychology. Please answer the following questions. o Identify at least four important milestones in cognitive psychology as discipline. Discuss the importance of behavior observation in cognitive psychology. Format the paper as APA standard Running Head: Definition of Cognitive Psychology 1 Definition of Cognitive Psychology Heather Burgess PSY 360 October 24, 1013 Dr. Matt Pearcey Definition of Cognitive Psychology 2 Definition of Cognitive Psychology Cognitive psychology is about learning, memory, perception And research on the psychological processes of thinking. As an official field of psychology, its roots can go back to Descartes, which tries to explain how thinking works and proposes analogy of "hydraulic system of neural function". 2007, p. 26) He observed a moving image at Saint-Germain-en-Laye. It is not only a constant pursuit of how the mind works, but also a merciless pursuit of the spiritual composition that ultimately constitutes the basis of cognitive theory. It is clear that different approaches are needed when psychologists study how psychological processes produce behavior. It only thinks of what I learned through rewards and punishments. Cognitive psychology definition paper 2 cognitive psychology definition paper cognitive psychology test heart. Brain and mind are thought to be two different things. The brain is an organ and the brain is the result of a personal thought process. In this article we will study exactly what cognitive psychology is, milestones in the development of cognitive psychology, and behavior observation in cognitive psychology. Definition of cognitive psychology Cognitive psychology is responsible for examining psychological processes and understanding why individuals do what they are doing. Some of the principles that it examines are personal perception, learning, attention, reasoning, memory, and problem solving. Everyone's recognition is different. Individuals use her or his perception to form judgments and thoughts about her or her environment. Everyone has different learning methods, it affects the way anyone learns

Cognitive psychology or cognitive science are better known and are designed to understand how people or machines access, store, search and apply knowledge and information. Sensory evaluation is a field of analyzing how foods are recognized (Herve Abdi, 2002). Sensory evaluation shows that science is necessary to control stimuli that are complicated and do not cause confusion of natural and ecological effectiveness. Sensory evaluation can pioneer research in new areas attractive for cognitive scientists. Running Head: Definition of Cognitive Psychology 1 Definition of Cognitive Psychology Heather Burgess PSY 360 October 24, 1013 Dr. Matt Pearcey Definition of Cognitive Psychology 2 Definition of Cognitive Psychology Cognitive psychology involves learning, memory, perception And a study of the psychological process of thinking. Relatively speaking, it is still relatively new, as an official department of psychology, its roots can be traced back to Descartes, which tries to explain how thought works and "hydraulic system of neural function" We propose analogy. 2007, page 26) After he observed the animated statue of Saint-Germain-en-Laye. It is not only a constant pursuit of how the mind works, but also a merciless pursuit of the spiritual composition that ultimately forms the basis of cognitive theory. It is clear that different approaches are needed when psychologists study how psychological processes produce behavior. It only thinks of what I learned through rewards and punishments. In the 1970s, most of psychology returned to the study of mind. Cognitive psychology studies memory, information processing, decision making and so on. Attribution theory explains how thinking (about what it leads to) can affect behavior, rational emotional therapists say that thought (irrational thinking) creates emotions . Our own behavior, when we have done well, we are satisfied with the inner strengthening. He believes that self-compensation behavior is as good and probably better as external strengthening behavior. Bandura also researched widely about the concept of self-efficacy. This is a personal perception of your ability and ability to control yourself. For 60 years, the comparative philosophy of behavioral psychology and cognitive psychology competed for the spirit of psychology. From the 1920s to the 1950s, behavioral psychology dominated many psychological thoughts, but the cognitive revolution of the 1950s cracked the radical theory and cognitive psychology eventually won the dominance. However, both psychologists have begun to recognize that both methods are valuable for patient treatment, resulting in comprehensive cognitive-behavioral therapy. Most psychologists now use a combination of behavioral therapy and cognitive therapy

"Snow White" and "Mullan" When compared the expression of Disney's female character, it is an international film company that dominates full-length animation. Two Minister Manga, Snow White (1937) and Mulan (1999) are good examples of the central role of women's role-playing, Snow White from the first half of the 20th century, and Mulan from the present age. During the era when these films were made, you may think that the expression of women changed (women's equality improved), and that some of the stereotypes Disney criticized in the past may have existed Hmm. Compared to 5 movies (Little Mermaid, Beauty and the Beast, Aladdin, Sage, Moulin), made in the 1980s, 50's (Snow White and Seven Dwarfs, Cinderella and Sleeping Beauty), female characters Is depicted as a more traditional gender role. (England, Descartes) Although these female characters in the movies showed more independence, each of these Disney Princesses has a romantic connection with the Prince and eventually a "proper" sex role I fulfilled. Disney is an international movie company that dominates the full length of manga. Two Minister Manga, Snow White (1937) and Mulan (1999) are good examples of the central role of women's role-playing, Snow White from the first half of the 20th century, and Mulan from the present age. During the era when these films were made, you may think that the expression of women changed (women's equality improved), and that some of the stereotypes Disney criticized in the past may have existed Hmm. Before Mulan was born, Disney's "Beauty and the Beast" and "Little Mermaid" brought about a big change in the female statue, but still behind a bold, attractive and decisive role, they still It can be said that it is a happy family. Housewife just waited to calm down Essay.com / female image Representative: Can Disney keep up with the times? There are many heroines in Disney's animated movie, Pixar's parent company. Disney is known for female hero films such as Snow White, Cinderella, Little Mermaid, Moulin etc. Many Disney movies are starring ladies and she is mostly a princess. If she is not a princess, she usually marries the prince to end the movie, or in the case of Mulan end the military officer. Not all "princesses" of Disney movies play passive roles in their lives, but they often realize that they need to be saved by men and the happy endings they seek are Including marriage.

In order to understand the politics we have, we have to see two philosophers who formed the idea and politics of the world. Niccolò Machiavelli and Thomas Hobbes have created a new political science against classical political views. Both believe that both the classical philosophy and Christianity are focused on reaching the imaginary Republic, but these fictive republics can not be reached. Under these fictive republics, men must maintain high standards and men must be noble; men can not maintain all virtues as men live in a world where not everything is good. . Thomas Hobbes and John Bramhall were contemporaries of Descartes who lived in Europe during the British Civil War. They discussed freedom and necessity around 1650. Hobbes believes that freedom has no external obstacles to behavior, because the voluntary actions of "free will" are necessary before and therefore have been determined. He regards the need as an order of God. Bramholk believes that freedom is prescribed freedom that can not be avoided, but I believe it is consistent with the foresight of God's foresight. Both are compatible, Hobbes' freedom and causal determinism are compatible with Branholm's religious determinism Freedom is consistent with necessity. Freedom and freedom are the same: As in the water, this is not only the freedom but also the necessity of descending through the waterways; the same can be said of the spontaneous behavior of men. Every action of man, every desire, every act is due to some reason, due to another reason, for another reason it is in a continuous chain, so the first link is God. Hand is necessary, it is the first one for all reasons. That's why he can do it. February 5: Robespierre tells the Convention on the Necessity of Terror as follows. April 10: All members of Luxembourg conspiracy members Danton and Hébert, as well as various other supporters, have been tried. Seven of them were found innocent and 19 people were sentenced to death, including Arthur Dillon who fought in the American Revolutionary War, including Lucille Des Moulin, a widow of Camille Des Moulin. , Pierre Gaspard Chamemet, the heritage of Jacques Herbert Fran Francis Herbert, and the dissected bishop GOBEL

Louis XIV reigned the French king for 72 years and made him one of the longest rulers in Europe. He was interested in art and changed French culture from medieval to highest. Rui does not want residual feudalism, he wants absolute monarchy. His goal is to make the monarch the most important political authority. Louis XIV symbolizes absolute monarchy and is a very powerful monarch who helps France gain enormous power. Louis XIV was the first child of Louis XIII, it was Anne of Austria, thought to have been given by God. Louis XIV is indeed a perfect synonym of the absolute monarch. He has the responsibility to make decisions, concentrate power, admire the monarchy, and fully govern the government. All of these prove that Louis XIV is a powerful "dedicated god" dictator. That is why he is a good example of an absolute monarch. Absolute monarchs dominated the policy of absoluteism. Absolatism insists that the King rules over the rights of Buddhism through the undeniable authority that the king legally asserts (French National Building and Louis XIV). Based on this, Louis XIV of France and Suleiman I of the Ottoman Empire are absolute monarchs. Every ruler believes that for his sacred right, his power belongs only to him and to him. - Versailles is a symbol of absolute monarchy. It is cut, elaborate and expensive. An example of the isolation of Louis XVI from other parts of France is that he made a short trip on a trip to the French state, Cherbourg. Recent politicians can not be regarded as being away from the outside world or the elite. It is hated by people Day 2 Political theory: Development of absoluteism theory Louis XIV, magnificent monk. Distribution of electricity and concentration of nobility, monarch and bourgeoisie. Practice of monarchy: So far, a comparison of princes (students choose princes from Eastern Europe and Western Europe to compare with Louis XIV, Elizabeth I and Philip II). René Descartes, Methodology, Galileo Galilei, Letters to Tuscany Christina: Pope's interrogation in 1633: Galileo "Sir Isaac Newton", "Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy" Manuel Kant, What is Enlightenment , Dennis Diderot, "Observations of encyclopedias of art and science" Voltaire, philosophical dictionary: British model, Mary Worthcraft, advocacy of women's rights, Jean Jacques Rousseau Contract

The beliefs and reasons between the 17th and 18th centuries brought up many ideas to change people's beliefs and reasons during the 17th and 18th centuries. These new ideas challenge the concept of the universe of mankind and the place inside the universe. They challenge people's perspective, and they also challenge economic beliefs. During this period, Francis Bacon, Rene Descartes, John Rock, Nicolas Copernicus, Isaac Newton, Adam Smith all had many scientists and philosophers. These wonderful description clauses have real elements. The Middle Ages emphasized faith, and the 17th and 18th centuries highlighted rational and reasonable discourse. However, a notable single feature can not explain the historical era. Many things develop and evolve at the same time in every period of history. Faith is a powerful medieval power, but the reason is also so. In this research my purpose is to explain and explain the role of reason in trying to understand the world of reason in the Middle Ages. From the late 17th century to the early 18th century, social and political change took place. Inspiration transitions from logic of enlightenment and neoclassical era to emotions and emotions of a romantic era. During enlightenment, authors such as Moliére and Swift expressed their ideas with reason. They solved a wide range of social and political problems at their own work. - The patriarchal patriarchal system, that is, the family's father's superiority and the male's pedigree's bloodline and genetic calculation, plays an important role in family life. But patriarchalism is not limited to European culture. In this article we will study the patriarchal case in pervert and compare it to the example in Japan. Between the 17th and 18th centuries, the 19th century decisively replaced the ancient noblemanism. In the first stage, literary works can begin to deal with this transformation and make an attractive comparison of works from different cultures undergoing their own processes. As an example, let's look at French playwright Molièle's Le Bourgeois Janti Rumum (1670) and the great Japanese playwright Chikamatsu Monzamon (1721) with love suicide. These playwrights were modern people; when Moliere died, Chikamatsu was already 20 years old. The traditions of theater in France and Japan are completely independent and are different in every respect, but in these plays the playwrights are thinking about the new social order that began to form around them.

The category of Aristotle's things is called "ambiguous" and they have common names, but the definition corresponding to the name is different. Therefore, the actual male and the person in the picture can be called "animals", but they have common names, but because the definition corresponding to the name is different, they are all arbitrary names . His definition in the case applies only to that situation, in the sense that everyone should define each animal as an animal. Aristotle's classification is a very important philosophical study. Not only is it the pillar of Aristotle's own philosophical theory, it has unparalleled influence on the systems of many great philosophers in the Western tradition. A series of doctrines in this category, which I call classificationism, provides a framework of Aristotle's various philosophical studies, from Aristotle's physics to time theory to metaphysics and even discussions from expansion. He refused Platonic moral philosophy in his ethics at Nikoma. Beyond his own work, Aristotle's taxonomy brought something like primitive man, porphyry, Aquinas, Descartes, Spinoza, Leibniz, Rock, Berkeley, Hume, Kant, Higg. The attention of various philosophers such as Brentano and Heidegger differently accepts, defends, modifies and rejects their central debate. It seems strange to quote Aquinas in articles about Aristotle's category, but I do it for two reasons. First, as Ackrill and Furth commented, Aristotle's plan was severely criticized by scholars and philosophers. But Aquinas' comments on quality shows that a truly talented translator - indeed Aristotle's interpreter is not as big as Aquinas - can satisfy many criticisms. Secondly, and more importantly, Aquinas' attention to quality category suggests its deep historical importance in one of the most important facts of the Aristotle category, ie metaphysical speculative development . In this respect, it can be compared with metaphysical 20th century quantifiers. It is difficult to imagine the analytical metaphysics of the 20th century, regardless of whether the quantifier has the final philosophical significance.

The Pratos humanity theory In my opinion, the analysis of Socrates' humanity is very realistic. It will eventually bring to him the definition of justice. I agree with his humanity theory, but I disagree with his social and political theory. In order to understand Plato's humanity theory and its socio-political theory, each must be carefully studied. Plato believes that no one can be self-sufficient independently. Humans are not equal, some of us are more natural than others, and some of us are stronger in our lives. In the context of his larger argument, Plato's humanity theory provides a basis for alternative answers to justice issues than injustice. From the point of view of development here, true justice is good health, it is only achieved by harmonious efforts of the three souls. On the other hand, with unfair people, the various parts are in permanent confusion, but they coexist with one another with an incomplete character that is unhealthy and insufficient in function. Plato described this topic in detail in the last book of the Republic. In my opinion, the analysis of Socrates' humanity is very realistic. It will eventually bring to him the definition of justice. I agree with his humanity theory, but I disagree with his social and political theory. In order to understand Plato's humanity theory and its socio-political theory, each must be carefully studied. Plato believes that no one can be self-sufficient independently. Humans are not equal, some of us are more natural than others, and some of us are stronger in our lives. For this reason, only a few people (perhaps a guardian) need to know what is most suitable for society, thus becoming a ruler of another person. ... Read more ... Humanity is the sum of our species identity, human identity, spirit, human spiritual, physical and mental characteristics. Plato and Aristotle depict humanity with different definitions and features; Plato emphasizes psychological / spiritual characteristics, arguing that Aristotle can not separate the mind and body. Since then, the definition has been split among people who believe the body is part of the human nature and those who believe the body is predominantly a human container. Thinkers like Aristotle, Darwin, Sartre, Lyle think about the thought and body related to the world, Plato, Descartes, Freud and Judaism - Christian religious thought - human beings are primarily intangible Link together - Often called spirit, essence, or mind

John Rock (1632-1704) was the first person in the classic English classics. These philosophers are skeptical of rationalistic metaphysics, in particular abuse of speculation, epistemology based on congenital concepts. Explain all natural knowledge of human knowledge without reference, and his theory is simpler and better than Descartes' theory. "As we said, thinking thinking is a white paper without thinking anything. In the theory of blank ideas, John Rock proposes rationality and logic that men and women can improve themselves by improving their environment. John Locke says, "as knowledge of authority and theory refused ... knowledge arises from sensory perception and experience ..." he influenced the understanding of Western philosophy and knowledge. (Major Source 212) The idea of ​​rock suggests that reorganization of society is to change the environment, to appropriately influence men, and to create a new society. Robert Owen saw the idea of ​​a completely new society in the creation of the utopian community John Rock is a British philosopher of the 18th century and is one of the most influential enlightenment thinkers. He is best known for his personal identity theory, his knowledge theory, the support of his religious tolerance, and the theory of his liberal state. His reasonable thinking and deep philosophy have had a great impact on society. John Locke was born in a wealthy family in Wrington, Somerset State. - John Rock is a British-born philosopher, doctor, writer who played an important role in the American framework. He was born on August 29, 1632 in Lynton, England. A father, also known as John, is a lawyer in the village that raises Locke with her mother Anges Keene. His parents were Puritans, which had a great influence on his later work ("John Locke") British, John Rock. John Rock has a philosophical influence on both political theory and theoretical philosophy, and this influence was reflected in the concept of the period between 1789 and 1914 and the concept of human rights equality. John Locke's work has influenced the work of multiple diplomats on freedom and social contract between the society and the government. Rock 's human and power ideology is the foundation of the concept of power separation. As an enlightening thinker, John Locke wrote two articles.

Difference between primary quality and secondary quality. Locke thinks the main difference between the two simple ideas we got from emotion. Some of the ideas we received were similar to those of the world, but others were not. The idea similar to its cause is the concept of primary quality, ie hardness, extensibility, image, movement, and quantity. What is not similar to the cause is the idea of ​​secondary quality of color, sound, taste, texture, and smell. The country of Lockerbie has a real world that transcends our understanding. John Rock is one of Great Britain's great philosophers and is widely regarded as a leader in the field of epistemology, metaphysics and political philosophy. He also made an important contribution to education, theology, medicine, physics, economics, political science. Locke's empiricistic epistemology (he is the founder of empirical knowledge theory) influenced Berkeley, Hume, and subsequent empiricism. In 1689, he announced "two political theories of government philosophy" anonymously. The first paper attacked the concept of the absolute power of the monarchy (patriarch system), the second the paper summarized Rock's views on orderly society, harmonizing civil liberties and political order. John Rock and John Stuart Mill's Freedom Definition John Rock thinks that humans should have more freedom in political society than John Stuart Mir. John Roc's "Second Paper of Government" and John Stuart Mill's "Freedom of Expression" outlines the conceptual framework of ideal nations of each thinker, but influential and powerful literature It is a work. Two different views on human nature and its freedom are proposed. About how John Locke and John Stuart Mill take different views John Rock (1632-1704) was the first person in the classic English classics. These philosophers are skeptical of rationalistic metaphysics, in particular abuse of speculation, epistemology based on congenital concepts. Explain all natural knowledge of human knowledge without reference, and his theory is simpler and better than Descartes' theory. - To live in society based on the social contract we signed, the government and artificial law is definitely a strong defender of the treaty itself. They will benefit the citizens and protect the country's safety. Nonetheless, they should not be the only reasons for justice, it should not be a precondition for justice.

Isaac Newton was born in England in 1642. He grew up without knowing his true father, but he hated his stepfather. At the age of 19, Newton went to Cambridge's Trinity College. So, he learned philosophers and astronomers such as Descartes, Galileo, Kepler and Copernicus. It is here; when Newton acquired his degree, Newton designed the theory of calculus. Newton got a degree in 1665, then devoted to binomial theory and calculus, was the most advanced and wise mathematician in our world from 1 to 1666. Newton writes as a physicist at the beginning of this year, "Nature's are inferred from their behavior more safely and naturally. In the final article of the next time, I will consider the contribution of Isaac Newton. Newton was probably one of the best physicists ever, living in the late Renaissance era and the scientific revolution era. Newton was one of the pioneers of enlightenment and caused an incredible degree of intellectual development following it. Queen Anne blocked Isaac Newton in 1705 and made him to Sir Isaac Newton. He died in 1727 and was buried in Westminster Abbey. Isaac Newton made many significant contributions and discoveries in his 85 years of existence. He is considered one of the smartest people in history. His life and his contribution far exceed the work of this article. He made many contributions to the scientific revolution and enlightenment (c.1500-1800). This paper is "touching the surface of Newton's life" only. It is difficult to write a short paper on one of the greatest people who have ever lived. To date, Newton is one of the most important contributors to ideas and theories to promote knowledge and learning. Isaac Newton's contribution to the science is multifaceted. They cover revolutionary ideas and practical inventions. Even today, his work in physics, mathematics, astronomy is important. His contribution to every field will make him famous; in general, they make him truly superior. But Newton is still a modest person who loves his Lord and the Savior. Some people condemn him as an Aristocrat, but this was rejected by Pfizenmaier, TC, Isaac Newton is Ariane? Biography.pdfdirectory.org, Journal of Thought History 68 (1): 57-80, 1997. A highly detailed defense of the Newtonian Trinity is Van Alan flock, The Sir Isaac Newton's theology, gradworks.umi.com, Ph.D. thesis, University of Oklahoma, 2008. This proves a lot of evidence. It includes Newton's words denying Triton and affirming the Trinity.

Opinionator: He is writing blogs of many books and blog authors NYT. (This article first appeared) Students think that their courses are boring and will only be important if they are involved in future careers and faculty members. Higher education makes sense if it makes knowledge culture an important part of society. Students should understand that education is opening new knowledge and understanding. The answer is simple in the past: the university is where you come to learn about these things. However, as higher education expands its scope, it becomes increasingly difficult to tell what the university is like and what the university is like. In the United States I now teach, more than 17 million undergraduates are planning to participate in this program this autumn. They go through scale, public and private institutions, two and four year systems, online and on campus. Some of them will pursue accounting, nursing or web design careers with profit organizations like DeVry University and Phoenix University. Many people enter the community college, get useful qualifications, or prepare to transfer to a four-year university. Not to mention experts, some people enter liberal arts college without professional planning. For any course, quite a few people will encounter Descartes as part of undergraduate requirements. Why is this happening? Generally, university administrators do not know what university education is: now, I will start from the beginning. That is the beginning. University is the best institution in our country. In fact, they are the crown jewelry of the most effective educational system in the world. If someone knows what learning is, those who manage the university should do so. Teaching the future of our country is not an easy thing, education is not an easy question to answer. Some of the world's best educators are still trying to figure out what kind of things are happening in the educational process. In our current education system, student education seems to be a process that can not be quantified by blows or missing. Art may not be technology

Anselm Anselm was born in 1033 by aristocratic parents in Aosta, Italy. He and his mother always have a strong relationship, but his relationship with his father is very different. They will never succeed. Anselm wanted to be a priest since he was a young boy. As a child, he imagined that heaven would stay on the Jupiter Hill outside his home, which might help plow this dream. Anselm did not want to become a monk any longer after a short period later, but when he was fifteen he did not become a priest. St. Anselm was born in Ostapiemonte in 1033. Anselm knew that he wanted to be a monk when he was very young. After Anselm's father forbade to follow his dream of becoming a monk, Anselm left the house in his early twenties. Anselm emigrated to France, where he became a monk in 1060. A few years later, Anselm became a precedent for Abbott. At 1093, A. A. Anselm was enshrined as an archbishop. The next few years was a tension and confusion between Anselm and the King about money and other issues ... St. Ansel brought problems to Rome where he was less helped than he thought. In the meantime, King William died and St. Anselm returned to England. The new king made great emphasis on St. Anthony and never denied his view or opinion on important issues. Nevertheless there are still problems like money that need to be solved by Rome. Even if there is a difference in a problem, St. Anthony and the King still have a good relationship. An ontological argument was originally developed by Anselm of Canterbury, a clergy and philosopher of the 12th century. Philosophers and scholars have found several different clues to Anselm's work. The simplified version of Anselm's proof was very popular in modern times (17th - 18th century), which was used with a few examples by Descartes, Spinoza, and Leibniz. A simplified discussion is this: Kant provides two major arguments for this proof. His first critique was traditional criticism. And it was used by Aquinas and many other medieval philosophers. Kant's argument depends on the following assertions: whether it is always two separate problems, one thing. We can say what you like about the essence and essence of things. It is always a matter of asking whether there is something with this essence or essence.

Historical development of self-conceptualism The development of self-concepts or self-concepts can be traced back to the era of classical philosophy that Hattie (1992) followed. Self-awareness is related to the identity, individuality and self-awareness of Greek philosophers such as Plato and Aristotle. In addition, the philosophers of the Renaissance promoted feelings "self" and "knowing self" as the foundation of existence through discussion. Hume (1711-1776) shifted from the mainstream of intellectuals and rejected the idea of ​​a unique and stable self-concept, but emphasized the superiority of "self-recognition" and the superiority of experience as a source of constant change . In order to learn this theory, first you need to understand the history of the development of self-conceptual theory. The earliest milestone in self concept theory was Rene Descartes. And it suggested that the existence of a person depends on the way he sees it. Sigmund Freud is one of the most famous psychologists and advocates a number of theories to talk about our inner psychological processes. In his theory, we are considered to have three main aspects, id (happiness oriented), self (balance between id and superego), and super ego (led conscience). Historical development of self-conceptualism The development of self-concepts or self-concepts can be traced back to the era of classical philosophy that Hattie (1992) followed. Self-awareness is related to the identity, individuality and self-awareness of Greek philosophers such as Plato and Aristotle. In addition, the philosophers of the Renaissance promoted feelings "self" and "knowing self" as the foundation of existence through discussion. Hume (1711-1776) shifted from the mainstream of intellectuals and rejected the idea of ​​a unique and stable self-concept, but emphasized the superiority of "self-recognition" and the superiority of experience as a source of constant change .

For many political theorists and thinkers, the concept of labor and property is essential to the development of the government and the state, and is therefore a very important aspect of human life. For some authors, the development of property is the direct result of the labor force, and the government has been established to secure the property rights of people possessing property. Some people think that property and labor are fundamental or natural links of human life, but others think that this is just a social custom. Every thinker has a different view on how to acquire property and restrictions on access to property. Two-sided coins: Thomas Hobbs vs. John Locke always has two aspects, including people and government, like science and belief. Thomas Hobbes and John Rock give the opposite impression of people, society, and government, but they are all British. Hobbes was born on April 5, 1588 and died on December 4, 1679; he is known for his work in political philosophy today. John Rock died on 29 August 1632 and died on 28 October Hobbes, Rock John Rock and Thomas Hobbes are famous political theorists of other eras. Hobbes who was born 40 years before the birth of rock has a totally different view from rock and both will do more research through this article. Many theories were different in the 16th century, but the rise of the state and the decline of the feudal system caused an authority problem, so the Hobbes and Rock theory got closer. - Why John Rock was the best philosopher ever in history John Rock was a British philosopher and doctor who lived between 29 August 1632 and 28 October 1704. He is one of the most outstanding enlightenment thinkers, and he explains many ideas that will affect humanity. Live in society today. He emphasizes human freedom and limits the authority of the government, so he is widely known as the father of classical liberalism (18). John Locke is a British philosopher and one of the most influential Enlightenment thinkers. Locke first asked questions about Descartes' Cogito Ergo Sum philosophy. Locke has an empirical belief that it ignores the concept of congenital concepts and promotes the role of human perception and experience. Locke got inspiration from Occam's razor to explain knowledge and shows that everyone means starting with a whiteboard, meaning a blank state. A blank slate argument may be considered

The very concept of human beings Why do we believe in human nature? Should we accept the appearance or should it be led by authority? It is necessary to point out by obtaining practical benefit or whether there is evidence. Philosophy provides such evidence including the Buddha and Plato's dream hypothesis (more famous is Descartes). The dream assumption reveals what we are in common with. It refers to the familiar experience, and young people of the place can understand why routines, authorities, definitions and first principles, categories, standards, recognition and paradigms may fail. Proof - Human thought is human thought or knowledge (II.xiii.). (II.ix.) is considered to be influenced by different thoughts about the actual existence of a particular thing. Since the human body requires a lot of body, it is constantly regenerating; the order and relationship of thinking is the same as the order and relation of cause (II.vii.); Therefore this idea exists in God It is. The impact of many specific thoughts. Therefore, as long as he is influenced by many other ideas, God has the concept of a human body or understands the human body, not because he constitutes the essence of human thought. It is a human body. But the concept of physical modification is in God as long as he constitutes the essence of human thought or human thought perceives these modifications (II.xii) Chapter 12 Whatever the object that constitutes the concept of human thought, how it is communicated, it must be perceived by human thinking, or the concept of events must exist in human thought. In other words, if the purpose of the idea that makes up human thought is body, nothing will happen to the body without being perceived by the heart. Proof - Any goal of any idea must be in God that knowledge (II.ix.Coroll.), He is considered to be influenced by the idea of ​​things, ie (II.xi.) I thought. Therefore, whatever happens to the objects that make up the human mind, that knowledge must be in God as long as he constitutes the essence of human thought. In other words, the heart knows it

In 1760, it was widely believed to be the beginning of the industrial revolution. In fact, the revolution began more than two centuries before this date. Between the late eighteenth and early nineteenth century, ideas and discoveries of people who have lived for a long time, such as Galileo, Bacon, and Descartes, appeared. The UK is considered to be the birthplace of the industrial revolution. In fact, from 1760 to 1830, industrialization was largely confined to the UK. Recognizing the start, the UK monopolized industrialization, banning the export of machinery, skilled workers and manufacturing systems. Between 1760 and 1830, the Industrial Revolution was largely confined to the UK. Knowing their opportunities, the UK banned the export of machinery, skilled workers and manufacturing technology. In particular the British monopoly can not last forever because some European business people tried to attract British expertise to their country and some British people saw advantageous industrial opportunities abroad . Two Britons, William and John Corker, brought the industrial revolution to Belgium by developing a machining factory in Liège (around 1807), Belgium became the first economically transformed country on the European Continent. Like British ancestors, the Belgian Industrial Revolution concentrates on iron, coal and textiles. Many authors believe that the industrial revolution can be divided into clearly distinguishable parts. For example, the first industrial revolution from 1760 to 1830, followed by the second industrial revolution since 1850 (such as David Landes). The first industrial revolution began with the mechanization of the textile industry, the development of steelmaking technology, and the use of refined coal. Trade 4 The Luddite movement began in 1811 with the name from the early Ned Ludd. The movement was very strong, there was a conflict in the fight against the British army, some of which were sentenced to death. Since then, the term Luddite has been used to describe people who oppose technological advances and technology changes.

Heidegger reads a summary of the trustworthiness of Plato's huge actor: the problem lies in Heidegger's belief that it is limited by Greek ideas, especially Plato's thought is not conceivable "ontology". "The meaning of what is called guidance and control of the Greek ontology is" existence = existence ". For this reason the Greeks could not accept the "problem of meaning of diplomacy itself". Heidegger's Plato's Sophist is his most extensive treatment of a single conversation. In order to test his own credibility, he says, "To verify that this sense of existence [real existence] actually led to the ontological question of [Plato] Through success. Heidegger claims philosophy and science, because ancient Greece simplified things to existence, it is a superficial way to understand them. An important source of this insight is Heidegger's reading of Franz Brentano's account of various uses of Aristotle's "existence", work inspired by Heidegger. The question is what kind of unitity is the use of this diversity. Heidegger opened his gigantic "presence and time" and cited Plato's boss. This suggests that the Western philosophy ignores the existence. Therefore, the intuition of Heidegger on the existence of the problem is a historical argument and in his later study he became a concern for the history of "the existence history", the history of forgetfulness. Through productive destruction of the history of footstep philosophy Martin Heidegger affected the persistence of Rorty in the process. Marking the history of Western Piazza and the "historical tradition" of the school, Heidegger believes that basic assumptions from Plato to the positivists still exist: the power of "strong people overcome weak" Relationship. Rorty ("Heidegger, Contingency and Pragmatism", 1991) states that Heidegger believes that diverse thinkers such as Aristotle, St. Paul, Descartes, Hegel are looking for the truth to overcome ignorance. This asymmetric power relationship is assumed in the process of rationally training sin by training sensual desire or by using sin. With the grace of God. Since it makes the project obvious, all thinkers are seeking ways to transcend themes in his own way. By doing so, the individual ceases to live by creating his own project to respect the existence of stronger influences.

Akinas' claims are as follows: If the universe is infinite, there are infinite days. It is never impossible to reach the end of a series of infinite days, so today will never come. However, as today has arrived, the past can not be made unlimited. Time starts from the beginning of the universe, this is happening. Since it generates an event, there should be a first reason. The first reason is God. Tannant said that there is a coincidence in the world. Discussion of cosmology first derives from examining some of the universe's experience and metaphysical facts and then something outside the universe inevitably leads to its existence. There are various types of cosmological arguments, and their defenders include some of the best thinkers across the history of philosophy, including Plato, Aristotle, Ibunsina, Argazari, Mimonides, Aquinas, Descartes . And Leibniz. Three versions of many attention-grabbing discussions are the Thomistic Contingency argument, the Leibnizian's complete reason argument, and the kalam argument. Thinkers thinkers like Gottfried William Leibniz and Samuel Clark reaffirmed cosmology. Leibniz (1646-1716) proposed a principle to strengthen for just cause, according to which "facts can not exist or exist in reality, there is no good reason to make it a reality, There is no other "(Monadology), § 32). The complete reason must exist outside this series of events and must exist in what we call God's requisite existence. inside that. Samuel Clark also used the principle of just reason in his cosmological argument (Rowe 1975: chap.2). Another type of cosmological argument is Leibniz's perfect justification theory, hence the name of German philosopher Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (1646-1716). In this discussion, you will answer the question. For Leibniz, what is present must have an explanation or "sufficient reason" and the interpretation of what is present must be based on its own nature or the needs of other projects. The argument is that the interpretation of the universe must be in transcendental God. Because the universe itself does not have the need to exist and God exists.

When she said that, this argument was rejected by the female statue "reaction of fairies to husband" in the poem. 5) - 6) It should be noted that these lines reflect the next line of Murrow 's poetry. "We will sit on the rock and we will see the shepherds eat a shallow river of their flocks" (ll.5-7)) The passage of time drawn in the season is in the Marlow poetry Because of changing the characteristics of these matters explained by the male character of men, the role of women impairs the idealization of the shepherd's countryside and pastoral living. Emotions and Reasons: Sir Walter · Laurie 's "Fairy Responsible Shepherd" and Christopher Marlow's "Passionate Shepherds Love him" Literary Analysis Compared to a glance At first glance, especially related to carpet poetry Given the handling of the subject matter, Horace 's statement may have a real link which seems to be a reasonable and logical statement. It represents the concept of answering Descartes' counter arguments and knowledge, how to obtain and define it, and represents the concept of true intelligence. By using wax experiments you can find, define and explain real intelligence. In this word, he reveals the truth we find through basic perceptual tools and senses, depending on how particular things are defined, or even deep knowledge that even if they exist I would like to prove that. Comparison of Sir Walter Laurie's "Shepherd's Response to the Shepherd" and Christopher Marlow's "Affectionate Shepherd" Sir Walter Rowley wrote "Sidhe to the Shepherd" in 1600. In response to Christopher Marlow's "passionate shepherd who loves him" written in 1599 by a shepherd, "respond". "Passionate shepherds love him", the shepherd uses porn and hidden sexual images to try to deceive nymphs to have sex with him. - Rejection to the Shepherd of Nymph "Reactions to Shepherds of Nymph" is a poem by Sir Walter Raleigh, who expressed the response to Christopher Marlow's poem "passionate shepherds love him" is. The reason why Nymph gave her refusal was just an excuse; the real reason she made the shepherd disappointed is that she lacked love for him.

Basically, there is a writing method starting from Descartes 'methodological discourse'. It was widely adopted by French writers in the 17th century and the American writers of Franklin and Jefferson came to Samuel Clemens and A. J. Leebring. Thomas and Turner called this style of writing "classic style". Classic style is true ... For over a decade, the clarity and simplicity as truth has led the reader to see the style as an elegant accessory for effective prose instead of its core. Francis-NoëlThomas and Mark Turner think that writing does not passively apply language skills but rather intellectual activities. In classical style motivation is truth, purpose is to express, reader and writer are same as intellectuals, and opportunities are informal. This general presentation style is everywhere, from business notes to private letters, journal articles to student articles. Everyone talks about style, but no one explains it. The author of this book did it; by doing so they motivate the reader to think about the style in the center of it, not as an elegant accessory for effective prose. In the first half of clear and simple, we introduce various styles such as reflexive, practical, mediocrity, meditative, romantic, predictive, to contrast with the classic style. The principle is simple. The motivation authors adopt is the truth, the purpose is to express, the readers are equality of intellectuals, the opportunities are informal. From business notes to personal letters, from magazine articles to college writing, the classical style is everywhere in the house. The second half of the book is an illustration, elaborate and sad. It shows effective examples and invalid examples. From Thomas Jefferson to Junichiro Tanizaki, from Mark Twain to the observation of college students, classical essays are seen everywhere. There are many beautiful performances in classical style, each one is clear and concise.

Scientific Revolution: The scientific revolution of Copernicus and Galileo has brought new and significant changes. It is very different that people started seeing. So far, religion is always a question of pure faith. Individuals can not use experience-based data or reasons to prove or develop religious concepts. People contradictory to the church are considered infidels and punished. At the present time, people believe in the theoretical universe of Ptolemy. The earth is the center and everything surrounds it. In the 17th century, scientific knowledge and the scientific revolution made remarkable progress. The works of Copernicus, Kepler, Galileo abandoned the old concept that the earth is the center of the universe. These findings bring serious challenges to the Bible and religious authorities, Galileo accuses heresy as an example. So the Bible is regarded as authority over faith and moral issues, but it is no longer scientific authority (or means). The mathematical interpretation of gravity in Isaac Newton (1642-1727) explains the behavior of objects on the earth and the sky objects. This promotes the natural world view controlled by natural law. In other words, this will raise the theology of theological creation of the universe, leave it to the field dominated by the laws of nature, and leave the outdoors. During the scientific revolution, scientists such as Galileo, Copernicus, Descartes, Bacon discussed the potential of God, human ability and the possibility to understand the world. Ultimately, the impact of the new scientific discoveries will begin to influence the way people and people think in Europe. Society began to question the authority of traditional knowledge about space. This in turn makes them suspect the national traditional view and the concept of social order. In the scientific revolution, "human thought changes from the medieval world to emphasize the eternal world of God who manages human beings, the universe, and nature and is derived from the understanding of unchanging knowledge and the laws of nature The accepted truth has nothing to do with it. "The scientists changed their perception of the world.

After grasping the muffin on the floor of my kitchen, my dog ​​looked at my eyes, I saw her head carefully leaning on the ground, and her jaws smelled a small smell It was. Before I had the opportunity to stop her, I smiled down my fingering finger to grab the muffin from the ground in vain and invade the backyard. This is a clever fraud and this day-to-day interaction is like causing a big problem I want to solve. In most of the 20th century biology was closer to Descartes than Darwin. Students of animal behavior do not rule out the possibility of animals thinking, but I think that this problem is almost irrelevant as it can not answer. You can investigate the input (such as food and environment) and output (behavior) of the living thing. But the organism itself is still a black box: unobservable things like emotions and thinking are beyond the scope of objective research. As written in 'Activists' written in 1992, efforts are made to avoid being consciously attributable to animals in any serious attempt to understand their behavior Should ... .... " The phrase "animal wisdom" should be taken to mean whether it makes sense to call an animal "smart", or whether an animal's behavior should be regarded as a series of unthinkable mechanical reactions to stimuli arising from within the animal I will introduce some debate. In the external environment, only humans can flexibly think and respond. This argument is now basically out of date. On the one hand, it has been replaced by a more empirical discussion of the success of research programs on animal cognition (assuming animals have cognitive processes similar to humans). On the other hand, it was eliminated by one of the more modern methods of human intelligence. Still, this problem will never completely disappear. The reason why it lasts is philosophy and morality, and (perhaps more) science. If so, what makes a pure white food unethical?

In many literary works, both individuals and society can pursue certain "supreme powers". This vitality helps to overcome what individuals are themselves and what is the purpose of life. According to Descartes, the essence of God is carved into each of us, if not material, that is, we all acquire the spirit of a kind of God in our body health I will. The relationship between God and Himself is physically that we are on this planet and that we acquire the essence of the Spirit of God in different ways. Just as we can know the nature of material things (wax), we can understand the nature of God by pondering our concepts. We can know the essence of God. But does God exist? We understand that God has "objective" reality as our purpose of thinking. But does God also have formal reality? Yes, according to trademark. God exists. In addition to "objective" reality, God has formal reality. That is the conclusion. What is the argument? Thinkers focus on questions about causality. What is the reason for thinking about my god? According to the opinion of thinkers, it is self-evident that, as a general rule, "among the effective and comprehensive causes, there must be at least as many reality as the cause of the cause" (40). This is explained by Cottingham as the principle of causality. If we find a clock, the reason for that clock must be at least as complex as the clock. The same thing can be said if we find the blueprint for that watch. The existence of something is exemplified by its nature (or its nature in terms of Plantinga 1980). God creates a specific table, and some of its essence is red. Then when he creates it, God will make the table red. Thinking of property is omnipotent. The property embodied in God is included in its essence. Therefore God makes the property exemplified by God as being omnipotent in the omnipotent way. As in the table example, like the way God causes red, God allows omnipotent people to follow his own example. But when God takes itself as an example, it certainly can not make this attribute omnipotent. How does God become omnipotent? In addition, God 's almighty may think that there should be a causal relationship before the property he caused. But in this case it is not

The argument that human evolution is fact or fiction has existed for hundreds of years. Evidence of human origin has been found in many parts of the world, and these fossils have been proved to be human beings. Eurasia and Africa are included in the world. Even though fossils were discovered in Eurasia, the ancestor of Huminoidia of human beings dates back to the Miocene era 23 to 5 million years ago. Hominoidea is a superfamily that includes many species today, including jibbons, orangutans, gorillas, chimpanzees, humans. Evolution theory and evolution theory explain the fact. Creationism is a myth that explains the facts. Evolutionism is proved by facts, creationism is a story about facts. It is always interesting to learn about science and religion, but it is interesting to understand that science produces facts and that all creationists (religions) can be discussed through evolution theory. Therefore evolutionists provided evidence and creationists tried many other thinkers who used scientific theories empirically inferred to challenge Galileo, Copernicus, Bacon, Descartes, and the Biblical hypothesis I will try to. . The Catholic Church called this ideology of creationism as heresy and thus has a bad habit of suppressing complete disarray of the Bible to some extent. For centuries the scientific research has evolved into the theory of big bang and evolution, although it is mainly such a place. Summary: # 2 The evolution of mankind is always a myth for most people. However, researchers studying human evolution tried to find evidence explaining human evolution. Researchers Christophe Boesch and Hedwige Boesch-Achermann are observing a group of local chimpanzees since 1979 in the tropical rain forest of Cote d'Ivoire. The chimpanzee needs to be equipped according to the wild environment.

The scientific revolution had a great impact on the enlightenment of the 17th and 18th centuries. The greatest contribution of the scientific revolution to the Enlightenment was to cast doubt on the concept of Christian doctrine through logic. This is beyond speculation that some people act personally among friends and may reach a level beyond the boundaries of any country. The Gutenberg's 15th century printing press made it possible for these great thinkers to spread their theory to those who did not have enormous wealth. God was born and prospered primarily in Europe and North America during the 17th and 18th century Enlightenment Period (please see the God of religious tolerance for details). Many American founder believe themselves as deity, or believe that elements of deity are part of their personal moral philosophy. Examples include Thomas Paine, Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin, George Washington and others. In addition to understanding our own moral lens, God also provides a useful window for historical ideas behind the establishment of our country. Okay, men and girls, ready to enlightenment In this lesson I will introduce enlightenment. what is that? Enlightenment, sometimes called the era of enlightenment, was an intellectual movement from the late 17th century to the early 18th century, emphasizing reasons, individualism, and skepticism. Enlightenment challenged the traditional religious view. Because that was such a wide movement, enlightenment did not have an accurate start date. It did not pop up, but it gradually developed. Most historians came to the beginning of enlightenment from the mid 17th century to the beginning of the 18th century. The work of intellectuals like Rene Descartes, Barus Spinoza, Isaac Newton is particularly important for the creation of enlightenment. Many critical thinkers believed that religion and reason are hostile in the age of enlightenment in the 17th and 18th centuries. For them, the Middle Ages or the "era of faith" is therefore the opposite of the era of reason. Kant and Voltaire were attacking the Middle Ages as an era of religious decline, and Jimbo in the "History of the decline and decline of the Roman Empire" expressed their contempt for "garbage in the dark ages". But like Petrarch, he saw himself at the cutting edge of the "new era" and criticized it for centuries before his own time, as was the enlightenment writer .

Animal experiments are described in the relevant section, but they are not discussed in detail. I first study the neuroanatomy of related brain regions and then explore the role of vmPFC before comparing with dorsolateral prefrontal cortical dysfunction. The neuroanatomical terms vmPFC and dlPFC are not universally defined in the literature (eg Nieuwenhuis & Takashima, 2011), explaining the function of the brain rather than the anatomical region. Ongur and Price (2000) defines a ventral medial reward network that is considered equivalent to Broadman area (BA) 10, 11, 14, 24, 25, and 32. Phineas gauge is one of the most famous and contemporary examples of brain cleavage. There is no doubt that many people 's brain damage survived the life of Descartes, but the accident the Phineas gauge suffered was well - known. Phineas gauge is a person who is occasionally known for thyroidectomy. After the metal rod passed through the frontal lobe of his brain, the Phineas gauge completed a whole body recovery. Phineas gauge whose story is also known as the "American Clover Incident" is an unconscious and unwilling contributor to the history of neuroscience. In 1848, when he was only twenty-five years old, Gage gave bad damage to his brain. His miraculous survival, and the impact of injury to his personality, provided an important case study for scientists who want to gauge the world with curiosity and want to learn more about the brain. In 1848, the gauge was responsible for the construction of Rutland and the Burlington railroad in Vermont, USA. Workers blow up the rocks with explosives and clean up the railroad. On 13th September the gauge pushed the explosive powder into the rock for explosion using a tamping iron (a long iron hollow cylinder weighing more than 6 kg). Irons hit the rocks and make sparks that put fire on the explosives. The rod goes through the skull of the gauge and enters through his left tibia and leaves his head

Enlightenment brought the first modern philosopher from 1650 to 1800, before the emergence of twentieth century events and existentialism as a true school. Among them, metaphysics René Descartes created his motto "Cogito ergo sum" most famously in his era for more than a century. Yes, this is the first answer to the quest for the first human existence and "philosophical grounds for a complete summary of existentialism" (existentialism). Nietzsche is suggesting that there are various types of nihilism, but of the most famous concepts, it covers only two of existentialism and moral nihilism. Existentialism nihilism simply confirms that life has no intrinsic meaning or value. Life is meaningless. Although the way of thinking is simple, it is difficult to grasp the complete concept. Because humans are afraid of uncertainty, I can understand this. Most of us need eternal hope for tomorrow, something to look forward to, and something to set us up for. For example, Ayer wrote that "There may be many ways to make yourself meaningful in human life." Everything that we think is worthwhile can be a source of meaning from raising children to collecting stamps. Existential nihilism is a belief that life has no essential meaning or value. Regarding the universe, existential nihilism assumes that even one human being or even the whole human being is not important, has no purpose, and can not change as a whole. The meaninglessness of existence is mainly explored in existentialist philosophical schools. Moral nihilism, also called moral nihilism, is a meta ethical view that morality is not unique to objective reality, so any action is not necessarily better than other actions. For example, a moral silenceist would say that killing someone is correct or wrong for some reason.

Today 's thought: According to the survey, babies are somewhat more conscious than adults, not only those that need to eat and cry. Adults may like to think like them Neuroscience | Descartes believes that the baby's heart is just a sensory disorder. For a while, several decades ago, the newborn was under surgery without anesthesia, assuming less consciousness than adults. However, Jonah Lehrer wrote about Boston Globe that the latest brain research is confirming how deviated this hypothesis is. Scientists have found that young children have more brain cells and less inhibitory neurotransmitters, and that is why they "learn amazing amounts of information in a relatively short period of time it can". Therefore, this article suggests that adults should be fortunate if they can have "developmental shortcomings" so that babies can not concentrate. It is our best choice to think like a baby. " This study is the subject of a new book "Philosophy Baby" by Berkeley psychologist Alison Gopnik and asked whether the baby's heart really needed Einstein style learning aids in "Weekly Review". In another interview with Seed, she explained the evolutionary advantage that infants "unintentionally useless" in their foolish brains. She said that the children "are like human research and development department." [Boston Gloves, seed] Gopnik insists that babies are conscious as well as more conscious than adults. Her argument against this view starts with an ordinary person - adult - who has a more conscious experience about what they care about, not what they ignore. Until we experience or have limited experiences, we do not have the feeling of background fridges or shoes on our feet until we stop thinking about it. In contrast, when we do routinely and skillfully and automatically (like driving to a normal route), we usually do not realize this most of the time. (But I think the problem is complicated.) Neuroscience | Descartes believes that the baby's heart is just a sensory disorder. For a while, several decades ago, the newborn was under surgery without anesthesia, assuming less consciousness than adults. However, Jonah Lehrer wrote in Boston Globe that the latest brain research is confirming how deviated this hypothesis is. Scientists have discovered that babies have more brain cells and fewer inhibitory neurotransmitters, which is why they can "learn amazing amounts of information in a relatively short time" I will help explain. Fortunately, babies can not concentrate on 'developmental shortcomings'. "When it is necessary to classify a lot of irrelevant information at a glance or to create a new one, it is best to think like a baby." Gopnik stated that the baby 's brain has greater plasticity than adults and has neurochemically similar general neurochemistry related to adult attention. Babies learn faster than us, learn more, and learn more casual knowledge without paying narrow attention. Gopnik notes adult attention, a mechanism that can change part of the mature slowly changing brain in a short time, flexible and quick learning, like plastic - like a baby suppresses changes in the brain Other parts of thinking as a mechanism to It is thought that young people can group more delicately than elderly people and suppress unrelated distractions. If so, young people may use a different recognition strategy than older people. The data in Table 4 shows that young people use more effective perceptual strategies whereas the elderly perceptually group visual sequences in rows or columns and scan them. Young people may be able to process all items in the array at the same time, but the process is noisy, sometimes the jammer is mistaken for the target. For young people, search efficiency is improved due to the larger set size. Because, as stated above, the spread of suppression is more effective at reducing the noise associated with individual interference of larger size. Madden and his colleagues have reached a similar conclusi

The Role of Gender in Anime Films Disney is one of the world's largest companies and has been known for entertainment and leading role in children's media for more than 60 years (Towbin, Haddock, Zimmerman, Lund & Tanner, 2003). The purpose of this study was to analyze Disney cartoon movies based on gender role and gender role mapping. Studies have shown that Disney cartoons are highly characterized by traditional women and men's characteristics (England, Descartes and Mick, 2011). There are many heroines in Disney's animated movie, Pixar's parent company. Disney is known for female hero films such as Snow White, Cinderella, Little Mermaid, Moulin etc. Many Disney movies are starring ladies and she is mostly a princess. If she is not a princess, she usually marries the prince to end the movie, or in the case of Mulan end the military officer. Not all "princesses" of Disney movies play passive roles in their lives, but they often realize that they need to be saved by men and the happy endings they seek are Including marriage. Role of Gender in Anime Films Disney is one of the world's largest companies and has been known for entertainment and leading role in children's media for over 60 years (Towbin, Haddock, Zimmerman, Lund & Tanner, 2003) . The purpose of this study was to analyze Disney cartoon movies based on gender role and gender role mapping. Studies have shown that Disney cartoons are highly characterized by traditional women and men's characteristics (England, Descartes and Mick, 2011). Especially at the early stage of the Disney Princess movie, depiction of Disney regarding men and women is influenced by gender norms and roles. When the Disney Princess movie was first released in the 1930's, the main cultural understanding of women was closely related to their role as a housewife. In order to win the audience and customer base, Disney used these ideas when the first Princess films "Snow White" and "Seven Dwarves" were released in 1937, effectively using Disney Princess Movies I drew them in a role. In addition, in the initial film production, almost all Walt Disney employees were men. Films produced by male employees not only reflect the dominant view of gender but also because the men of the time were thought to be more capable and thus superior to women, the inherent bias I'm waiting. This reflects a strong, skilled number of men and a quiet and weak social custom of women.

One of the most controversial cosmological arguments about the topic of human history, Craig / Khalam is whether God exists. There are often discussions as this main argument has several different reasoning and secondary discussion. Those who believe in the existence of God discuss how God acts or one or more. People who do not believe in the existence of God will claim how the universe exists or always exists. In this article I will explain Craig's argument about the existence of God and observe Craig's argument. About here and here that Christian "clear thinking power" has been argued: William Lane Craig brings a new argument for the existence of God while blog cross, considering Bob Saiden sticker. On the contrary, Craig announced it in 2013 and it is not that new siden sticker argument, but it is the first Alex Rosenberg And it must be explained that applies to the discussion. However, this sentence is very important. The first argument is, "From the mathematics of the variant just above the transcendental argument, this argument is that it is not. The transcendent argument tries to prove that the existence of God is only a possible choice from the abstraction of the sacred doctrine (the view abstract entity is considered the idea of ​​God) (the principle of logic of logic) ontology I will. Mathematical discussion is related to epistemology and has nothing to do with ontology. In other words, theisticism responds to ways that human thought better understands the universe through mathematics than naturalism. One of the most controversial cosmological arguments about the topic of human history, Craig / Khalam is whether God exists. There are often discussions as this main argument has several different reasoning and secondary discussion. Those who believe in the existence of God discuss how God acts or one or more. People who do not believe in the existence of God will claim how the universe exists or always exists. In this article I will explain Craig's argument about the existence of God and observe Craig's argument. Second argument about the existence of God. Descartes believes that existence is perfect, so it can be a predicate to God. I will first explain what is the ontological argument of God's existence. Next, I will explain why Descartes decided to lead God to a philosophical approach. Then I try to claim that existence has some truth revealed about God, and perfection as God's predicate. Ontology attempts to prove the existence of God from a transcendental point of view

Officialism is a well-known, religious-based explanation of "inner" human thought and "external" human body. It comes from a famous and respected dualist, Julie Descartes. Dualists believe that mind and body are independent entities that are usually connected until they die. Therefore, before the body dies, human beings are both physical and soul. The mind exists in time, and the body exists in time and space. All substances present in the universe including the human body are subject to the same mechanical law. Doctrine: Official teaching of religious groups. Religious organizations and officials often make theories through written statements and councils. In the context of Christianity, the Trinity is an important doctrine. Among Buddhist, Hindus and Jainist traditions, ahimsa is an important doctrine (McBrien 1995: 424). Doctrine: the truth that all Christians must accept and its systematic statement. The Greek word is "dokeo". Dogma is particularly prominent in Roman Catholicism and is clearly stated in universal churches and pope. In non-ceremonial environments, it has a derogatory meaning (Reid et al. 1990: 361). Organized religion or institutional religion is religion, the religious system and ceremonies are organized systematically and formally established. Organized religion is often characterized by official doctrinal (or doctrinal), structure of hierarchical or bureaucratic leadership, and culmination of rules and practices. Religion ... For us, it means the feelings, actions and experiences of individual men in solitude ... they are related to what they think is sacred. Since this relationship may be moral, physical or ritual, it is clear that religion, philosophy, and church organization may grow secondarily in the sense that we accept it. There is doctrine about the essence and situation of thought. It is very common both among theorists and among laypeople, and it should be described as an official theory. . . . Descartes' official doctrine is mainly like this. In addition to doubt and young children 's doubts, everyone has a body and mind. Some people would rather say that everyone is body and mind. His body and his ideas are usually used together, but his thoughts may continue to function after the body dies. The human body is in space and is subject to mechanical laws governing all other objects in outer space. . . . But thoughts are not in space and their behavior is not subject to mechanical laws. . . . . . . This summary is the official theory. I often talk about it as a deliberate insult as "ghost doctrine in machines".

"Strong bodies make minds strong," Thomas Jefferson once published a statement on human personality, talking about the essence of human growth and learning. As society made human beings bigger, stronger, smarter and smarter, humans came up with a convincing species to do research. There are many areas that human ability of recently learned is covered, but in many recent studies, it is known that evidence of physical and physical connection is optimal for programming. "The mind and the body are opposite to each other in many respects and both the body and the mind must act according to their own principles.But thought and body differ in character but they are complementary And as a function of the whole person we need to discover the actual nature of spiritual characteristics. "The principles of physical and mental adjustment express the natural function in human life It is seen as a universal law. . Therefore, they can be applied directly to myriad everyday activities and tasks. When learning Japanese yoga it is not unusual to encounter courses and seminars that apply these general principles directly to clerical, sales, management, sports, art, music, talking in public etc. Psychological history of many psychology in the mind and body includes attempts to solve physical and mental problems and how they interact. Thanks to the influential work of René Descartes written around 1630, the philosophical distinction between the body and the mind can be traced back to the Greeks, but first the systematic explanation of the relationship between the body and the mind You should. When he is a friend of Descartes and frequently journalist Marin Mersenne wrote him Galileo ... Language is one of the most powerful media in the human world, not only through languages ​​but also through visuals and media. Music to express words. Language is the silence between spoken words and phrases and the next phrase. In our culture we are trying to mark objects as monochrome. It is either or this, but when something is missing from the language, we try to assign a color to it rather than making them real. I have two people. The problem of mind and body is a philosophical question about the relationship between thinking and consciousness in human thinking and the relationship of the brain as part of the body. This problem is based on an interactiveist on the relationship between the mind and the body, so it is different from the psychological and physical effects of the body in chemistry and physiology. Based on the assumption that the mind and body are fundamentally different fundamentally, this problem occurs when the mind and body are considered different.

Free fall is an object that falls under the influence of gravity. It is said that an object that receives only gravity is in a free fall state. Free fall objects have two important motion characteristics. All free falling objects (on the earth) will accelerate downward at a speed of 8 m / s / s (usually about 10 m / s / s in the envelope calculation). Since the free falling object is accelerated downward at a speed of 8 m / s / s, the trajectory of the automatic transmission belt or the point diagram of its movement represents its acceleration. The dot plot on the right side shows the acceleration of free falling objects. The position of the object is displayed at regular time intervals (for example, every 0.1 seconds). The fact that the distance traveled by objects at each time interval increases is a clear sign that accelerates as the ball tilts downward. When you recall the previous lesson and the object moves downward and accelerates, that acceleration falls. Acceleration of natural fall can be seen frequently in physical classroom through popular strobe light demonstration. The room became dark, and the kettle filled with water was connected to the dropper via the tube. The dropper drips off and the droplets where the flash falls are irradiated at a constant rate (eg once every 0.2 seconds). Instead of seeing the free flow of water from the dropper, you can see that it drips continuously several times as the separation distance increases. The drop pattern is similar to the dot plot on the right figure Measurement of free fall acceleration Introduction Galileo Galilei (1564-1642) got the concept of correct acceleration of free fall for the first time and when all the resistance of the medium is completely eliminated, all the materials fall at the same speed. Today, this applies to all objects that can fall freely near the surface of the earth. The purpose of this experiment is to verify that Galileo claimed that the acceleration is constant. In addition, the magnitude of the acceleration is calculated One of the main achievements of Galileo physics is the explanation of free fall. According to the free fall rule discovered by Galileo, all the objects on the surface of the Earth are uniformly accelerated and the acceleration of all objects is constant. Galileo did not ask where the acceleration of falling objects came from. The falling body obviously violates the law of conservation of momentum. According to Descartes, the movement of the falling body has to be accelerated by something, the body must grow momentum somewhere. But for Descartes, the only interaction mechanism is contact interaction (ie push or pull). The additional amount of motion given to the falling body must be moving (there must be some movement to be able to transmit the motion) and it must constantly be in contact with the falling body. As learned in the previous unit, free fall is a special type of movement where the only force acting on the object is gravity. It is said that free falling objects do not encounter large air resistance and are affected by gravity. In this case, regardless of quality, all objects will fall at the same acceleration. but why? Let's consider the free falling movement of a 1000 kg elephant and a 1 kg full body rat. If Newton's second law applies to descending movement and a free body map is created, you can see that 1000 kilograms of elephant has greater gravity. This greater gravity directly affects the acceleration of the elephant; therefore, based on intensity alone, it can be assumed that a 1000 kilogram baby elephant accelerates faster. But acceleration depends on two factors: strength and quality

When most people hear the name of Isaac Newton, they think about Apple's story that falls from various laws of physics and trees; furthermore, some people even think he is the inventor of calculus maybe. But Newton has shapes formed by events occurring all over the world. The 17 th century was an era of confusion and change all over the world. The turmoil in this era was mainly due to political and religious turmoil and it had a great influence from the mathematical and scientific discovery that Newton was actually born in 1646 to the early 1700s. Sir Isaac Newton was born on Woolthorp Estate in England on December 25, 1642. He was born too early and is a child. His mother said that he was too young, he can fit in the rhetoric pot. Sir Isaac Newton was born three months after his father died. When Sir Isaac Newton was three years old, the mother remarried to the pastor Barnabas Smith. Sir Isaac Newton stayed in the care of his grandmother. From 12 years old to 17 years old, he received education at the King Grantham School. Sir Isaac Newton (1642-1727), a mathematician and physicist, was one of the best scientists ever. Sir Isaac Newton was born on Wool Soap, a farm of Lincolnshire on January 4 (December 25 calendar). Woolsthorpe is the place he studied optical theory and optical theory. It is also considered to be the place where Newton observed that Apple fell from the tree and encouraged him to formulate his law of gravity. He entered the University of Cambridge in 1661; he was elected a member of the Trinity College in 1667 and was elected Professor Lucas Mathematics in 1669. He stayed at the university and lectured most of the time until 1696. During these Cambridge times he was at the top of creativity and he picked 1665-1666 as "the golden age of my invention". Though it was not published until 1687, he prepared a Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica, commonly known as Principia, with intense spiritual work for a couple of years. Isaac Newton entered the Cambridge Trinity College under the emergency of his uncle William Ayscough ("Newton, Sir Isak", Encyclopedia of Mathematics Biography, 394). Newton studied law at Cambridge, but the results were very different. When Newton was at the university, the school's philosophy dominated Aristotle's philosophy. Later, he became more generous at the university third grader, so he started studying the philosophy of Descartes, Galsendi and Boyle. Viete, Descartes, Wallis 'new analytic geometry, and Galileo' s Copernican astronomy dynamics also fascinated him. When Barro arrived in Cambridge's Lucasian chair ("Jazz Isaac Newton", ONLINE), Newton's talent began to grow. Isaac Burrow began to recognize him, soon he became a mentor of Isaac Newton. Under the direction of Isaac Barrow, Isaac Newton began to show his wonderful wisdom. Isaac Newton received a math scholarship!

Sir Isaac Newton, Sir Isaac Newton 's life says "Great enemies are good" - Jim Collins. From zero, Isaac Newton has decided to work hard in his life to be good at whatever he wants. Between 1669 and 1687, Sir Isaac had left during the most prolific period of his life, which made his thinking process even bigger. His last period and the longest period were to advance into a new position and maintain a wonderful position. Sir Isaac's life defines a way for a person to have a bad start and recovery in life. According to the report, when talking to Lord David Brewster (1831) of Isaac Newton 's lifetime about Edmund Halley' s disrespect of religious belief, Newton replied. In recent years, this has often been cited as a statement specifically defending astrology. Newton wrote sharply on the importance of prophecies and studied alchemy, but there is little evidence that he is focusing on astrology. In footnote, Brewster condemned the anecdote of the astronomer Neville mask line, which is said to have given it to Oxford professor Stephen Peter Ligo. Sir Isaac Newton was born on Woolthorp Estate in England on December 25, 1642. He was born too early and is a child. His mother said that he was too young, he can fit in the rhetoric pot. Sir Isaac Newton was born three months after his father died. When Sir Isaac Newton was three years old, the mother remarried to the pastor Barnabas Smith. Sir Isaac Newton stayed in the care of his grandmother. From 12 years old to 17 years old, he received education at the King Grantham School. Isaac Newton entered the Cambridge Trinity College under the emergency of his uncle William Ayscough ("Newton, Sir Isak", Encyclopedia of Mathematics Biography, 394). Newton studied law at Cambridge, but the results were very different. When Newton was at the university, the school's philosophy dominated Aristotle's philosophy. Later, he became more generous at the university third grader, so he started studying the philosophy of Descartes, Galsendi and Boyle. Viete, Descartes, Wallis 'new analytic geometry, and Galileo' s Copernican astronomy dynamics also fascinated him. When Barro arrived in Cambridge's Lucasian chair ("Jazz Isaac Newton", ONLINE), Newton's talent began to grow. Isaac Barrow began to recognize him, soon he became a mentor of Isaac Newton. Under the direction of Isaac Barrow, Isaac Newton began to show his great wisdom. Isaac Newton received a math scholarship!

Three articles on Introduction of Proust Last winter, I wrote the philosophical view of Candice Vogel, six essays and asked to identify Marcel's method and Marcel Proust's swan. Philosophical texts, including Descartes' first philosophical consideration and George Berkeley's Hiras and Philonas dialogue, are linked. Our mission is to enable the ideas of Proust, Descartes, and Berkeley to communicate with each other - what constitutes experience, what constitutes divinity, what is knowledge, what is present I will compare their ideas side by side. Proust is a good literary critic and his comments on former novelists are always interesting. His article on Flaubert style - originally wrote a letter to the editor of Le Figaro in response to an article there - for details of style definitely one of the deepest and deepest things about Flaubert, for example as a verb tense Meaning of. In addition to occasional literary criticism, Proust also wrote a series of stickers, a literary imitation of his favorite writer. And we present the same theme in styles such as Balzac, Flaubert - famous criminal cases These imitations are one of the most fascinating criticisms ever. They show extraordinary abilities and can be integrated into other writers and styles of the world. They exaggerate enough to capture the details and spasms of the function and make people laugh ValentinLouis Georges Eugène Marcel Proro called Marcel Proust (July 10, 1871 - November 18, 1922) is a French novelist, essayist, critic. Under the influence of Gustav Flaubert 's work (a person we have seen before), his most famous work is "searches for disappointment time", 7 volumes based on Proust' s life. Fable novel. Robert Lee Frost (26th March 1874 - 29th January 1963) was an American poet and I was impressed with the depiction of life in New England. He did not succeed in publishing poetry in America, so he moved to London, England, and finally won praise. One of his most eye-catching poems is The Road Not Taken, which is the source of our travel offer choice. The writer Doris Lessing commented on the documentary "How Proust Change Your Life" (Alan Deborton's book) that read the Proust for pure entertainment. But maybe she also read the French version, or there are some doubts about what she thinks interesting. When the narrator encountered Mme Verdurin, one of my favorite characters, I must admit that I laughed once or twice. I did not know that Proust was hard to find, but contrary to the "very easy and transparent work" Nabokov said, it is not a simple reading. Proust's famous long sentences and clauses, lack of newlines in conversation between letters, and sparse chapters (each volume divided into 5 or fewer chapters) make it a challenge for modern readers

Greek and Christian truth model SørenKierkegaard raised the question of "how far the truth was acknowledged" under his pseudonym in Johannes Klimakous in his philosophical fragment (154). A more direct and concise statement of the Climacus question is "To learn the truth?" His question does not include the scope of human knowledge, so "knowing" means, but a pattern that people may know the truth. In Climacus there are two possible understanding modes, or two theories on how to know the truth. It is Greek and Christian. Signature John 1: 1 is one of many examples of the Christian Bible using the Greek concept to explain the truth: "In the beginning it is the Word, the word is with the God, and The Word is God. " The original meaning of the signature logo was "opinion, speech, speech, reason," but the stoic school began to associate it with the spiritual creativity of the universe - the rationality of physics. This is related to Plato's "form", which is defined as the ultimate perfect model he holds in the minds of the Creator. The identity of Jesus as a sign means that his doctrine directly reflects the universal truth of creation. Greek and Christian truth model SørenKierkegaard raised the question of "how far the truth was acknowledged" under his pseudonym in Johannes Klimakous in his philosophical fragment (154). A more direct and concise statement of the Climacus question is "To learn the truth?" His question does not include the scope of human knowledge, so "knowing" means, but a pattern that people may know the truth. - "Cogito ergo sum - I think so." Mathematicians, scientific thinkers, and metaphysics Rene Descartes used this term for his "first philosophical meditation". This term is particularly noticeable in Western philosophy. But this word is not the only legacy of Descartes. Her legacy includes Cartesian coordinates, development of philosophical books and theories. Content like language will reveal the culture of early Christians. One of the criticisms of Gnosticism by Lyon is that they distort the Christian truth by introducing ideas from Greek philosophy (against heretical 2.14.2). But you can see that Greek philosophical thought penetrated the work of Christianity early in the Gospel according to John. In the 2 nd and 3 rd centuries, writers like Clement of Alexandria and Origan had adopted the language of Stoic and Platonic philosophy.

Existentialist: I am myself, you are an existentialist who regards humans as individuals and their distinctive past experiences establish personal characteristics that will change us all. This idea is best expressed by visual remarks of famous individualist Taizan. "My Taishan, you Jane" is the core of an existential atomic belief. This seemingly simplified statement, including existentialism, leads us to believe in existence before nature and leads us to choose the concept of freedom by guiding the perception of human personality. On the surface, Taishan's word "Me Tarzan, you Jane" seems very simple, but from the standpoint of existentialism, I noticed that it is not just a look. Existentialists such as Jean-Paul Sartre saw this sentence proposing three concepts of existentialism: individualism, existence of existence and freedom of choice. Existentialists see humans as individuals and their own past experience establishes personal characteristics that make us all different. This idea is best expressed by visual remarks of famous individualist Taizan. "My Taishan, you Jane" is the core of an existential atomic belief. This seemingly simplified statement, including existentialism, leads us to believe in existence before nature and leads us to choose the concept of freedom by guiding the perception of human personality. These three beliefs may be related to the character of "Exit None" by the existent writer Jean-Paul Sartre. Existentialism originates in the philosophers SørenKierkegaard and Friedrich Nietzsche of the 19th century, but they are not used in their work. French existentialists such as Jean-Paul Sartre, Albert Camus (1913 - 1960), Simone de Beauvoir (1908 - 1986) from the 1940's to the 1950's included academic and imaginary works I wrote. Promote the existence of themes such as fear, boredom, alienation, absurdity, freedom, dedication, meaninglessness. Unlike René Descartes where belief is a top priority, existentialists are "thrown" into a concrete and incomplete universe that human beings can not "think", so existence ("in the world") exists We insist that it leads to consciousness. It is the ultimate reality. Therefore, contrary to the traditional Greek philosophy of ancient Greeks, it exists essentially before existence (essentially possible for the meaning of life). As Sartre said, "At first there was nothing. JP - I think his servant knows him - he is known as one of the great existential philosophers. In an excellent article titled "What is Existentialism?" He explained that over the centuries our nature (our soul) was first present and then taught to exist in the existing meat. We were born and through our experience of survival we have determined our essence. The choice you do is not sure, but your own conscience will decide who you are. This is the opposite of Descartes.

Relationship between the concept of Plato's soul and the body Plato's theory of the body and soul was born from his earlier theory and dialogue, "analogy of the cave" and "formal theory". Plato believes the soul is immortal. The soul exists before reaching the body, even when the body dies. This is a dual interpretation of physical and mental problems. Plato combined the soul with the tanks responsible for the two horses, and the two horses were pulling in the opposite direction. Perhaps the earliest concept of mind and body (429-347 BC). Like Descartes, Plato believes the heart is the same as the soul. However, unlike Descartes, Plato believes that the soul exists and survives in the body, and has undergone a continuous process of reincarnation or "reincarnation". It is not just a spiritual philosophical doctrine, but an integral part of Plato's metaphysics. One problem with Plato's dualism is that he says that the soul is trapped in the body, but that there is no clear reason to tie the soul to a particular body. Believing the independent soul and body is very popular in ancient Greece and taught by one of the most famous philosophers: "Immortality of the soul is the major doctrine of the Greek philosopher Plato ... Plato The thought of the soul is self movement and indivisibility ... it exists before the body in which it lives, and it will survive "(Fog, p. 32). When and how do you bring the concept of immortality of the soul into the Christian world? The Old Testament did not teach it. The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia explains as follows. "We are affected by Greece, Platonic's idea is more or less, the body is dead, but the soul is immortal" (1960, Vol.2, p. 812, "Death") can not be found It was Origin of Metempsychosis is in early Greek philosophy, but it appears in literary works from Plato to Nietzsche and James Joyce. It means that the soul returns to another body at the time of death. After more than a year of death and resurrection in the music industry, the old tradition has been told, and in 2017 the music itself is reincarnated. After overturning and declining for 20 years, the music industry seems to have taken a new form and revitalized.

Acceleration of Free Fall To study the movement of free fall, the object is dropped and recorded on a wax coated paper by electric spark at a position after successive equal time intervals. Based on these data, plots of distance versus time and speed versus time are plotted. By determining the slope of the velocity versus time curve you can find the acceleration caused by gravity. Theory In one dimension, the average speed of an object in an interval is the quotient of the distance the object moves and the time it takes to travel that distance. (1) neutral. Einstein first pointed out that free falling in the gravitational field will result in constant acceleration (speed change, but constant speed). Then he realized that the observer could not distinguish free falling into the gravitational field and other equal acceleration mechanism like rocket. Einstein later thought that acceleration describes how an object moves in space and time, and because it is indistinguishable from free falling gravity and any uniform acceleration. Please explain the direct impact on the object. Space itself. The result proves that this is deep insight Then he raised hope for the patent office's happy thought. People can accelerate freely to the ground due to gravity, but I feel incompetent (until there is a shock). Therefore, Einstein recognized that gravity and acceleration are both sides of a coin. Accelerate the upward thrust of the rocket ship so that the gravity of the earth supports your feet against the ground, the crew will be nailed to the floor. Equality of this acceleration and gravity explains a strange Newton 's agreement. The mass of the object (inertial resistance to movement change) is equal to its weight (or mass to mass) response (response to gravity). Einstein established a special theory of relativity theory under the constant speed principle of light; he suspected that general relativity can be based on equal principle of inertial mass and gravity. If he succeeds it means that the laws of nature are the same for all forms of movement. One of the main achievements of Galileo physics is the explanation of free fall. According to the law of free fall of Galileo, all objects on the earth's surface accelerate uniformly, and the acceleration of all objects is constant. Galileo did not ask where the acceleration of falling objects came from. The falling body clearly violates the law of conservation of momentum. According to Descartes, the movement of the falling body must be accelerated by something and the body must acquire momentum from somewhere. But for Descartes, the only interaction mechanism is due to contact interaction (ie push or pull). The agent that gives the additional momentum to the falling body must be moving (must have some movement to be able to convey the movement) and it must always be in contact with the falling body

In the natural state described by Locke, everyone has the right "to dispose of themselves and their property in the way that they think they are fit" (Plamenatz, 1992, p. 338). The property of this broad concept is equal to freedom and is limited only by human duties to God. In other words, you will not destroy yourself and accept the same rights of others. Locke's narrow sense of ownership means that the exclusive right to use things that others have not claimed so far seems appropriate by putting human labor and objects in a natural state as described above It means that it arises from the right to dispose in a way. As a dream resolved in meditation, Descartes even alleges our own reality; "I often dream of staying in this familiar environment - when I undress my clothes in bed, Descartes was doubtful because he felt that there was no way to separate his dream from the reality and even the fact that he questioned his dreams might be there so he always dreams, I dreamed of it being so realistic, but after I woke up I remembered that I noticed that it was a dream. The cosmological controversy is "after verification" of the existence of God, ie it is based on a series of preconditions derived from experience, but the conclusion is not necessarily included in the premise. However, the fact that discussion is posterior is advantageous. It depends on universal, or at least verifiable experience. It is flexible. That is, there are several possible conclusions. Also, you do not have to accept the definition as fixed. The advantage of cosmological argument lies in their simplicity and understandable logic. This may explain why philosophers use it in various ways for a while to prove the existence of God. What is the meaning of the lifelong diplomatic thesis of child developmental research papers? Papers on esoteric music festivals (samples of philosophical articles) Articles on esoteric music festival Articles on computer science Article articles on heros Safety extended articles Theme yeast infection technology Generated paper n care (tourism essay ???) ?? hsc ) Thesis was written in a university thesis on the legendary essay on the work of the lawyer Ramanujan in a Tamil article on active work. Papers in my background room only English papers mean philosophical papers Nepal's thesis of grandmother's death technique causality problem Our educational thesis comments abortion persuasive thesis no prose custom writing youtube write motives peace newspaper Cat call The philosophy of the sample article is to read the essay and answer of the thesis, read the thesis, pollute the environment and cherish my preference paper belong to an interesting local paper of my own east and west paper management. Papers Environmental Solution Degraded Papers Financial Topics and Sample Papers Natural Disasters Graphics My Resubmitted Papers Marathi Version A paper by Nicola Tesla worthy of writing a paper on the structure of BBC articles on Wikipedia. Creative lighting type 9 years

Isaac Newton was born on Woolthorpe in England on January 4, 1643 and grew up there. His father, also known as Isaac Newton, was a wealthy farmer who died three months before the birth of Isaac. Isaac was born prematurely; he was very small and weak and was not expected to live (biologically) When he was 3 years old, his mother Hannah remarried a pastor named Barnabus Smith and got married with her grandparents I left Isaac to live. He was very unstable, became an exhibited boy and showed irrational behavior (biological). According to the report, when talking to Lord David Brewster (1831) of Isaac Newton 's lifetime about Edmund Halley' s disrespect of religious belief, Newton replied. In recent years, this has often been cited as a statement specifically defending astrology. Newton wrote sharply on the importance of prophecies and studied alchemy, but there is little evidence that he is focusing on astrology. In footnote, Brewster condemned the anecdote of the astronomer Neville mask line, which is said to have given it to Oxford professor Stephen Peter Ligo. Sir Isaac Newton was born on Woolthorp Estate in England on December 25, 1642. He was born too early and is a child. His mother said that he was too young, he can fit in the rhetoric pot. Sir Isaac Newton was born three months after his father died. When Sir Isaac Newton was three years old, the mother remarried to the pastor Barnabas Smith. Sir Isaac Newton stayed in the care of his grandmother. From 12 years old to 17 years old, he received education at the King Grantham School. Isaac Newton entered the Cambridge Trinity College under the emergency of his uncle William Ayscough ("Newton, Sir Isak", Encyclopedia of Mathematics Biography, 394). Newton studied law at Cambridge, but the results were very different. When Newton was at the university, the school's philosophy dominated Aristotle's philosophy. Later, he became more generous at the university third grader, so he started studying the philosophy of Descartes, Galsendi and Boyle. Viete, Descartes, Wallis 'new analytic geometry, and Galileo' s Copernican astronomy dynamics also fascinated him. When Barro arrived in Cambridge's Lucasian chair ("Jazz Isaac Newton", ONLINE), Newton's talent began to grow. Isaac Barrow began to recognize him, soon he became a mentor of Isaac Newton. Under the direction of Isaac Barrow, Isaac Newton began to show his great wisdom. Isaac Newton received a math scholarship!

"Mind - body difference" We usually consider the brain and body to be physical. When thinking, it may be better to understand and understand the mind. When thinking, the mind is purely composed of thinking and the body is expansion. The mind tells the body what to do. The mind is a psychological entity, the brain itself is the body. I can not imagine the brain, but the difference between the brain and the brain is which is spiritual and the other is physical. Both the body and mind are like foundations. Dualism assumes that there are two ontological different entities, the mind and the body. This distinction may come from the fact that the body and the mind are composed of different substances (substance duality) or the same substance, but the function is different (functional duality). The double concept can be traced back to Zoroastrianism around 1000 BC, which is also a great part of Buddhist philosophy as well as modern religious beliefs. Mind and body dualism represents a metaphysical position that the mind and body are two different substances and each has a different nature. The famous version of an ancient origin, dualism comes from René Descartes of the 17th century. According to him, humans are made up of two completely different substances that can not be unified. The mind is not taken into consideration, it is a material that is not material but is a thought substance and the body is an expanded material but unthinkable substance. The body is bound by mechanical law, but the mind is not (Descartes, 1952). Therefore, as Lyle (1949) states, "One person ... live through two mortgages, one happens inside the body and the other happens in my mind. Things ... the events of the first history are events of the material world and the second events are the events of the psychological world "(p 11 - 12) The problem of mind and body is a philosophical question about the relationship between thinking and consciousness in human thinking and the relationship of the brain as part of the body. This problem is based on an interactiveist on the relationship between the mind and the body, so it is different from the psychological and physical effects of the body in chemistry and physiology. Based on the assumption that the mind and body are fundamentally different fundamentally, this problem occurs when the mind and body are considered different.

To elucidate the diversity of complex numbers was always a fascinating torture for me; that is why I am interested in the world of mathematics. Finding the relationship between new digital patterns and numbers is a new discovery; this is that I am interested in learning more about Fermat's little theorem and exploring it. Pierre de Fermat, a small theorem citing FERMAT, is a French mathematician whose attention to analytical geometry and calculus is getting enough attention. Since Fermat's small theorem is a special form of Euler's Totient theorem, the two proofs provided in this exploration are similar, but fine-tuning Fermat's minor theorem to prove that Euler's Totient theorem is correct is needed. KrÌāi Ìz? Œ? ). This can be done using an equation where the two numbers a and n are relative prime numbers. Here, the set N of numbers is the relative prime of n {1, n 1. N2 |. This set can have an α element defined by the number of relative prime numbers of n. Similarly, in the second set aN, each element is the product of the elements of N {a, an1, an2, an3âan ||||}. At the end of the Latin translation of Diophantus's Arithmetica, Fermat claimed to have found a beautiful theorem. And it became famous and called Fermat's last theorem. For centuries mathematicians have struggled until 1995 until British mathematician Andrew Wells (born 1953) seemed to solve this problem. Several mathematician historians wondered if Fermat had the evidence that he claimed to have. French philosopher and mathematician René Descartes (1596-1650) was one of the key figures of the scientific revolution. Descartes studied classical subjects, Aristotle and mathematics, and performances, poetry, horse riding, and fencing at the Jesuit college of Ange. He entered the military school, traveled to Europe in the 1620s, and finally enjoyed social freedom in the Netherlands. He could become a creative thinker without worrying about Catholic anti-reform It was. Later, he returned for a short visit to France. Later the theme was completed by Hungarian genius Paul Erdos. Ramanujan's work on theta function provides a prototype of many mathematical elementary topics. These include proof of Fermat's last theorem, the Langlands plan, and Monstrous Moonshine's theory and its application to string theory. Ramanujin may be the most influential master of the Infinite Power series. He is a wizard with division number theory, and his identity forms the basis of basic hypergeometry theory. Finally, Ramanujan's "Circle Law" invented by Hardy can be considered analogy to the analytic number theory of the wheel invention.

An argument about the existence argument argument argument of God is an a priori argument. These arguments try to prove the existence of God from the meaning of the word God. Anselm of Canterbury introduced an ontological argument to his work 'Proslogion'. The classic argument of Anselm is based on two principles, the most important of which are St. Anselm and Rene de Carte of the above Canterbury. If you understand the meaning of talking about God, you must confirm his existence and argument argument must be true. An ontological argument about God's existence refers to the logical possibility that the existence of God brings to God's reality. Ontological arguments, by definition, begin with the assertion that God is infinitely great. Therefore, any existence can not transcend the greatness of God. In other words, God is the most imaginable being (if you can imagine a bigger existence, it is a god). Infinite greatness must exist in every possible world. Because existence that exists only in one possible world is replaced by existence that exists in every possible world. In addition, the greatest existence is the existence of attributes required to exist. Therefore, if there is the greatest existence in the possible world, it exists in every possible world. If all possible worlds have infinitely large presence, it exists in the real world. Because God is infinitely wonderful existence, God must exist. Second argument about the existence of God. Because Descartes believes the existence is perfect, it can become a predicate to God. First, I will explain what the ontological argument of the existence of God is. Next, I will explain why Descartes decided to incorporate God into his philosophical approach. As a predicate of God existence reveals some truth about God. Ontology seeks to prove the existence of God from a transcendental point of view Ontological discussion is a philosophical argument on the existence of God using ontology. Many discussions are categorized into ontology categories and they tend to include discussion about the state or existence of the existence. More specifically, ontological discussions tend to begin with the a priori theory of cosmic organizations. If the organizational structure is true, that argument will provide reasons why God must exist. The first ontological argument in the West Christian tradition was proposed by Canterbury's national anthem in his 1078 Proslogion. Anselm defines God as "there is nothing more to think" and believes that this existence must exist in the mind even in the minds of those who deny the existence of God. He suggested that if there is the greatest possible presence in the heart, it must also exist in reality. If it exists only in the mind, a larger presence must be possible - the existence that exists in the thought and the reality

Through human existence, scholars seriously pursue knowledge and realize the truth. Historical figures like Plato, Descartes and Emerson are looking for answers to the next difficult question. What is the reality? How to get wisdom? Plato doubts all historical, cultural and personal views, prejudice and assumptions, Descartes doubts the definition of reality and its existence, Emerson expresses confidence and self-confidence . Ideal, opinion, and belief Considering that students often think that it is difficult for Emerson's style and implications, Emerson cares about his audience and colleagues, not as a writer who builds himself, but a unified philosophy or movement (eg , Transcendence) supporters. As an American scholar / poet / prophet. For example, this may call for attention to certain definitions or categories Emerson faces, such as "literature" and "poetic" content, allowing scholars "learn" content, etc). It will lead people to see how Emerson explains his audience or masses, how to solve their difficulties and expectations, and how he represents his "era". In this context, Emerson's journal works are very useful; students can see the writers present their own expressions, reflect and reflect. Impact of Ralph Waldo Emerson's transcendental philosophy and Margaret Fuller's feminist philosophy Ralph Waldo Emerson is the main thinker of the first American transcendent movement. Many of the most influential views on the movement between human thought and the world are advocated. - If possible live as much as possible and laugh when laughing like laugh like hell, gentle and angry when angry. Please be alive. You will soon die. - William Saroyan Although this attitude towards this lifestyle may be humorous and simple, William Salo Yang explains all the needs of people living together and experiences life altogether. "Calpe diem" is a phrase that is not familiar to Latin scholars only The transcendentalist has developed a well-designed philosophy that saw the unified whole in all creations. Ralph Waldo Emerson wrote an influential article, Henry David Thoreau wrote Walden (1854) and is talking about Walden Pond's life alone. Margaret Fuller is an editor of an important transcendental magazine. When young, Nathaniel Hawthorne announced a short story. The most impressive of them was allegorical 'Young Goodman Brown' (1835). In the 1840's he began crossing transcendentalists and began writing his two most important novels - "Scarlet Letter" (1850) and "House of Seven Gables" (1851)

Sir Isaac Newton was born on Wool Soap, near Grantham, Lincolnshire, England on December 25, 1642. Newton is clearly the most influential scientist in history. His achievements in mathematics, optics and physics have built the foundation of modern science and have revolutionized the world. Newton studied at the University of Cambridge and served as a professor there from 1669 to 1701 and replaced his teacher Isaac Barro as a Lucas mathematics professor. His most important findings were two years from 1664 to 1666, the university was closed and he retired to his home Ursoorp. Sir Isaac Newton is a British mathematician and physicist and is considered one of the best scientists in history. He has made an important contribution to many scientific fields. His discovery and theory lay the foundation for many advances in science. Newton is one of mathematical inventors called calculus. He also solved the mystery of light and optics, developed three laws of motion, and derived a law of universal gravity. Newton was born on Woolthorp near Grantham, Lincolnshire on December 25, 1642. Sir Isaac Newton was born on Woolthorp Estate in England on December 25, 1642. He was born too early and is a child. His mother said that he was too young, he can fit in the rhetoric pot. Sir Isaac Newton was born three months after his father died. When Sir Isaac Newton was three years old, the mother remarried to the pastor Barnabas Smith. Sir Isaac Newton stayed in the care of his grandmother. From 12 years old to 17 years old, he received education at the King Grantham School. Isaac Newton entered the Cambridge Trinity College under the emergency of his uncle William Ayscough ("Newton, Sir Isak", Encyclopedia of Mathematics Biography, 394). Newton studied law at Cambridge, but the results were very different. When Newton was at the university, the school's philosophy dominated Aristotle's philosophy. Later, he became more generous at the university third grader, so he started studying the philosophy of Descartes, Galsendi and Boyle. Viete, Descartes, Wallis 'new analytic geometry, and Galileo' s Copernican astronomy dynamics also fascinated him. When Barro arrived in Cambridge's Lucasian chair ("Jazz Isaac Newton", ONLINE), Newton's talent began to grow. Isaac Barrow began to recognize him, soon he became a mentor of Isaac Newton. Under the direction of Isaac Barrow, Isaac Newton began to show his great wisdom. Isaac Newton received a math scholarship!

Galileo Galilei was born on February 15, 1564 near the musician's son Pisa. He began studying medicine at the University of Pisa, but later changed to philosophy and mathematics. In 1589 he became a mathematical professor in Pisa. In 1592 he became a professor of mathematics at Padua University until 1610. During this time he participated in various experiments including fall speed, dynamics and pendulum of various objects. In 1609, Galileo heard that the Netherlands invented the telescope. Even without looking at an example, he made an excellent version and produced many astronomical discoveries. These include the mountains and valleys of the surface of the moon, the sunspots, the four largest moons of the planet Jupiter, and the phases of the planets of Venus. His astronomy work made him famous and was appointed a court mathematician in Florence. In 1614 Galileo was condemned as a heretic because he supported Copernicus's theory that the sun is at the center of the solar system. This is revolutionary when most people think that the earth is in this central position. In 1616, he was forbidden to teach and support these theories. In 1632, he announced "dialogue on the two major world systems", he was condemned again for a heresy. This is an argument in the form of discussion between the two who support and oppose Copernicus's theory. Galileo was summoned to appear before Roman Inquisition officer. He was convicted, sentenced to life imprisonment, and then forcibly housed under permanent arrest at Arceletri in southern Florence. He was also obliged to publicly withdraw support for Copernicus' theory. He is blind now but he continues to write. In 1638, with his view on Galileo's law of motion and the principle of dynamics, his "Discussion on Two New Sciences" was announced. Galileo passed away in Arcelli on January 8, 1642 Italian astronomer and physicist Galileo Galilei (1564-1642) is the first scientist who used a newly invented telescope for celestial recording and observation. In the abundant career, the discovery of Galileo including the phase of satellites orbiting Venus and Jupiter has given a fatal blow to the theory of Earth-centered theory. British physicist and mathematician Sir Isaac Newton (1642-1727) developed the laws of motion and gravity in the 17th century and showed the beginnings of Newtonian physics and modern astrophysics. In addition to developing calculus, Newton has made significant progress in understanding light and optics that are important for the development of astronomy. Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica (mathematical principle of natural philosophy), Newton's pioneering research in 1687, dominated the field of intelligents in the Western side for more than two centuries and proved the driving force for progress in astrophysical mechanics. Great thinkers, Galileo Galilei (1564-1642), Rene Descartes (1596-1650), Sir Isaac Newton (1642-1727) are the main examples of human rationality and the conflict between Catholic churches. Given their ongoing importance and the suspicious influence of these thinkers, we think that it is important to ask. The use of human reasons to understand the existence of the universe and human existence precedes Galileo, Descartes and Newton. Italian astronomer and mathematician Galileo Galilei (1564-1642) used a telescope to support the Copernicus heliocentric theory. His findings challenged established scientific and religious ideas. Galileo is an important contributor to the development of scientific methods used by modern scientists. Genghis Khan (1162 - 1227) recovered from poverty and tied the war of the tribe of Mongolia. He imposed discipline and loyalty and then began to build an army that became the Mongol empire conquering the vast area of ​​Central Asia and China. He is known for its violence and generosity. The Mongol empire lasted long after his death in military operations. His descendants joined the empire until it became the w

The existence of God is a controversial philosophical argument, and since the 'Enlightenment' era philosophers have been mystified. However, many of the various discussions presented and analyzed do not fully prove the existence of God. In order to move forward, we need to study the argument of failure in order not to repeat the failure. One of the arguments is an ontological argument. This discussion was first recorded by St. Anslem (1033-1109). Descartes adapted to this argument with his fifth meditation of "Contemplation of First Philosophy". First of all whenever thinking about a triangle, he decided that there must be certain attributes to make that shape a triangle. Criticism of the ontological argument began with Gauniro at the same time as St. Anselm. Perhaps the most famous criticism of ontological debate is due to Emmanuel Kant in his criticism of pure reason. Most notably, Kant argues that ontological arguments are at risk by implicit assumptions that "existence" is a predicate. But as Bertrand Russell said, it is easy to be confident that ontological arguments are less accurate than what they are doing. This will help explain why ontological discussions have captivated philosophers for nearly 1000 years. Some recent discussions on ontological arguments were placed on more weathering of discussion about God 's existence. Thus, for example, ontological arguments have been widely discussed in Everitt 2004, Sobel 2004, and Oppy 2006. The study of ontological theory by Sobel is typical. He provides a chapter on "classical ontological argument": criticisms of Anselm, Descartes, Spinoza and Kant's ontological argument; chapters on "Modern modal ontology argument": Hartshorne, Malcolm and Plantinga ; There is also a chapter on Gödel's ontological argument. His analysis is very cautious and uses many tools for modern philosophical logic. Ontological discussion is a philosophical argument on the existence of God using ontology. Many discussions are categorized into ontology categories and they tend to include discussion about the state or existence of the existence. More specifically, ontological discussions tend to begin with the a priori theory of cosmic organizations. If the organizational structure is true, that argument will provide reasons why God must exist. The first ontological argument in the West Christian tradition was proposed by Canterbury's national anthem in his 1078 Proslogion. Anselm defines God as "there is nothing more to think" and believes that this existence must exist in the mind even in the minds of those who deny the existence of God. He suggested that if there is the greatest possible presence in the heart, it must also exist in reality. If it exists only in the mind, a larger presence must be possible - the existence that exists in the thought and the reality

Voltaire criticized Descartes and "Kane was born to reveal ancient mistakes, but was born to use his own alternative" This indicates that he does not agree with Descartes' natural view He emphasizes the dangers of the metaphysical system and he firmly believes that this feeling is a sense of external stimulation. Voltaire is on the way of God for Newton. "Therefore, the main driving force behind the overall natural movement of the engine is attractive." Newton was supported for supernatural reasons, an agent of God as the universe. Mary Sherry 's Frankenstein psychology of psychoanalytic research of Sigmund Freud was incredible in the late stage of the romantic era. William Wordsworth, Percy B. Shelly, Sir Byron, Mary Sherry's works serve as a poetic prelude to Freud's 18th century. In particular, Mary Sherry 's Frankenstein created a fictitious rendering for psychoanalysts. In Frankenstein, the rejection of Victor 's monster represents unconscious self - rejection. Mary Sherry's novel Frankenstein was influenced by Sherry's mother and her husband. Her mother 's view formed Mary Shelley' s view, embarrassing her in many criticisms abused in the age of feminism 's enlightenment. Shelley's own monsters and their views on their representation always conflict with her husband, so the novel lost a lot of consistency for Percy Shelly's extensive editing. Mary Shelley may have her own wonderful information and ideas, but in her novel Frankenstein it is hidden by the mother's and husband's ideas. Overall environment During enlightenment. Mary Sherry 's Frankenstein was written about 100 years after the beginning of Enlightenment, which is a typical example of this writing. Shelly raised the question "What made a monster?" In her novel, Dr. Frankenstein, the founder of the monster, can be regarded as a representative of God. Did he fail in evil in the world, did God fail? Social prejudice is also an important element of the monster 's death, indicating that monsters are not created at the time of birth but created over time. Compare Mary Sherry 's Frankenstein and Kenneth Brana' s Frankenstein with most Americans who think about Frankenstein because of Frankenstein 's many movies. Contrary to common beliefs, Mary Sherry's Frankenstein is a scientist, not a monster. This "monster" is not an implicit, angry criminal as described in the 1994 movie novel. Sherry's original Frankenstein was distorted by this Kenneth Blanca movie. Frankenstein's human morality is a product of evolution by genetic mutation and natural selection. It is entirely part of nature, but it is not - it is the opposite. In the last sentence of "Origin of Species", Darwin said, "This view of life has greatness ... In this form the most beautiful and most wonderful infinite form already exists and evolves. "A beautiful and wonderful form includes agents that react truly ethically to real moral facts and shape natural things."

In Fyodor Dostoevsky's "The Brothers Karamazov", he advocated a famous claim established between the existence of God and morality. In addition to disputes related to the scope of citations, contacts also discussed the correct translation and interpretation of the words of Ivan Karamazov. For example, in his article "Dostoevsky did not say that" D. Cortesi claimed that Dostoevsky did not make such a request (Cortesi 1). However, research by Russian authors shows that the original text of "Karamazov brothers" contains statements under study (Volkov 1). It has controversy with philosophers, theologians, scientists, and those who have opposed and opposed the existence of God over the years. Discussion about the existence of God is a very traditional and controversial argument in the history of mankind. The existence of God is a matter of discussion between philosophy, religious philosophy, and popular culture. This report explains the analysis of various perspectives that philosophers detail various topics and perspectives discussing the existence and necessity of God in different times and topics that are discussing. Since there is no evidence that things are predictive and if it is the highest there is no evidence that various philosophers believe that the existence of God is not necessary. Discussion is controversial and controversy has been established in modern times to determine if God exists and whether its existence is necessary. Christianity and Judaism believe that God interferes with almost every particular event or situation in history and shows its existence. These events and interventions prove empirical evidence of the existence of God. For example, Exodus and the command of the Ten Commandments in front of all Israeli tribes. There is much debate about the existence of God about the existence of God. For a long time everyone wanted to prove the existence of God. Some people think that God exists and is proved by many philosophical or scientific foundations and religious reasons. On the other hand, others do not believe in the existence of God, and their foundation is proved from many theoretical and scientific point of view. Many people try to prove the existence of God with reason. After Descartes proves its existence, people will consider the truth about the essence of God, evidence of the existence of God, and the nature of material objects. The main task in Descartes' meditation is to design a system that allows him to understand the truth. He wants to lay the foundation of all further philosophy

British soldiers who died in the war have more conflicts than other British empires. In the best situation, this is a tough burden. In addition, the way of fighting breaks all romantic aristocrats and the notion of courageous war - neither aristocratic nor brave nor war nor courage. Lady Dalloway of Virginia Woolf is a novel about the atrocity of slow trauma and the inability to face reality. Most of this emotion came from useless struggle of Septimus Smith who is a mentally disabled who came back from the Western Front. Ron Smith: John Frederick Nimes said: "The sense of humor is proportional sense." Despite the strength of the encouragement power of poetry, my book loses their common sense and its proportional sense It is not desirable. In addition, when I was reading a new poem, I actually did not consider the meaning when I was writing a new poem. I am thinking about that effect. Is this image or this line broken, or what is this rhyme doing for the reader? Humor is a device that allows me to surprise good readers and divert their attention. It is also indispensable for a healthy life. Everyone needs one fun thing everyday. Sir William's "proportionality" involves refusing to see the human value he requires as being inconsistent with the national value of his servant and the authority he maintains. His proportional sense is the acceptance of hypocrisy, the inevitable disconnection of personal value and public value, and a barbarous attack on those who reveal this break and overcome it. Sir William's sense of equilibrium is the acceptance of the necessity of self-destruction, but the reason that Septimus is a heroic satire is that he refuses to accept this division and death to maintain his unity of unity Because I have an intention to accept. "Beauty has a place of right proportions because sensations like the proportions like the proportions like proportions." This theory is not essentially an Aristo. Dotadologist, Pythagoreanism and Platonism also understand emotions, or at least perfect form. In fact, the fusion of different philosophical traditions in this basic point is the reason to think. In other words, whatever Descartes reads or does not read, the doctrine can not be what he does not know. (In particular, since the doctrine is the main content of traditional music theory, it shows that Descartes is not just a past acquaintance.) Plato's work, in particular the Republic and Timmouth show the proportional structure of the universe It is.

Historically, Valerian was a nonscientific source of information to ease anxiety and insomnia 1. Due to the adverse effects of FDA-approved drugs on these symptoms, many experts questioned whether the most effective and safest information could be obtained by supplementary methods. This led to the investigation of the true effectiveness of the Valerian root and the impact on those subjects. Comparison of Valerian and diazepam using the STAI - Trait scale revealed that diazepam is superior. The results, but the side effects of both are similar. Other research courses Valeriana officinalis is known for its calm and relaxing facilities. It has been in use for a long time by people such as anxiety, nervousness, irritability, insomnia. Valerian promotes very calm and rapid sleep, enhancing sleep quality. This herb is only a few drops at a time, it is used as a fresh rooting agent. Also, the largest sanctuary known as Tulsi helps the body adapt to stress, it also promotes energy and endurance. This herb is adaptive to nerves. It does this by improving the body's ability to use oxygen efficiently. Tulsi can calm the mind and help you recover from the hustle and bustle of the day. It has also been shown to have a positive effect on people diagnosed with chronic fatigue syndrome. Tulsi is abundant in eugenol, a ingredient that helps relieve pain and helps with musculoskeletal pain. This herb can be used as tea or tincture Historically, Valerian was a nonscientific source of information to ease anxiety and insomnia 1. Due to the adverse effects of FDA-approved drugs on these symptoms, many experts questioned whether the most effective and safest information could be obtained by supplementary methods. This led to the investigation of the true effectiveness of the Valerian root and the impact on those subjects. Comparison of Valerian and diazepam using the STAI - Trait scale revealed that diazepam is superior. The results, but the side effects of both are similar. Other research courses The positive advantage of using tea and meditation to treat insomnia is that there are no serious side effects, and unlike prescription medicine, they are not used to them. For example, it is known that the root of Valerian has a calming effect on the brain and nervous system. Some people try to stop using prescription sleeping pills, some use valerian to help reduce sleep after reducing sleeping medication (Beddoe). - Descartes' second meditation explained that personal sensations and personal imagination can not completely perceive physical objects. He explained that it is the mind that is necessary to fully perceive the physical object. This is because senses and imagination can only accept sensory data and thinking separately, whereas the mind can make judgments based on sensory observation. Despite the persuasive power, Descartes' claim is flawed. The fact that the mind relies on sensory data

If "Cogito Ergo Sum" of René Descartes embodies the essence of unity and reasonable Descartes' meaning, T.S. Elliott's "mountain of broken statues" enthusiastically incorporates contemporary things that are scattered and alienated (post). The message conveyed by this sentence was resonating throughout the poem from that poem "The Waste Land" to the last slogan "Shantih shantih shantih". All words, phrases, sentences (or simply images) that make up this poem seem to be in the Levi-Strauss word. "Because the image of Elliot means not to use a fixed meaning, it makes me thinking reminiscent Abandoned land, TS Eliot (1922) 1931, TS Eliot (1888-1965) wrote 434 lines of poet divided into five parts. Symbol and extensive scope After World War I, literature reproduced the sense of social, cultural and personal division suffered by civilization. This verse contrasts past ideas and moral grandness with vulgar, decadent and worthless phenomena. This poem means that modern life is a great waste of spirit. Since Elliot was first published and became one of the main metaphors of the 20th century, this term has been used in countless short stories, novels, poems, and plays. Watanabe, Silvia (1953-) Facts about companions of American short story document, 2nd edition (literary series companion) Elliott wrote "Wasted Land" in 1921 after he recovered from the collapse of tension. "It is considered to be the most important poem of the 20th century, and T. S. Eliot's" The Waste Land "is a kind of slope for despair and purpose of modern Western civilization. I thought Hal could move, but I think that The Waste Land is very interesting and sometimes lyrical, but I think that it is often difficult to understand. Successfully, I can not understand the passage of French and German, I feel that there is a tendency for Elliot and the editor of the book to reversibly give up. Waste land - the last thing. If T. J. Eckleburg and his ashes sound like T. S. Eliot and his "Wildland", A + is for you: you are obviously very concerned about the English lesson. T. J. Eckleburg is a nod to Fitzgerald's modernist poet T. S. Eliot and his view on the society after the First World War is as irritable as Fitzgerald. So, what about this hypothesis? Does Fitzgerald make Elliot a Prophet of his generation? Or was he indirectly tied Elliott to Ash Valley? Maybe he was born - Tom's family is really rich. It is not as wealthy as the family of Nick, not as wealthy as Gatsby, but they are rich and money came back. In addition, he used it as a luxury and crazy thing, like bringing a polypony yarn to the woods' lake.

John Rock was the son of a state prosecutor, born on August 29, 1632. He grew up during the Civil War and during the Civil War, then in 1652 he entered the Oxford Christian Church where he remained as a student and teacher for many years. Rock teaches and teaches in Greek, rhetoric, moral philosophy and other subjects. Lockedisconreed matches much of the university professor's theme. After reading Descartes' book, Rock has a strong interest in contemporary philosophy and scientific problems and theory. British, John Rock. John Rock has a philosophical influence on both political theory and theoretical philosophy, and this influence was reflected in the concept of the period between 1789 and 1914 and the concept of human rights equality. John Locke's work has influenced the work of multiple diplomats on freedom and social contract between the society and the government. Rock 's human and power ideology is the foundation of the concept of power separation. As an enlightening thinker, John Locke wrote two articles. John Rock and John Stuart Mill's Freedom Definition John Rock thinks that humans should have more freedom in political society than John Stuart Mir. John Roc's "Second Paper of Government" and John Stuart Mill's "Freedom of Expression" outlines the conceptual framework of ideal nations of each thinker, but influential and powerful literature It is a work. Two different views on human nature and its freedom are proposed. About how John Locke and John Stuart Mill take different views John · Rock John · Rock was born in Somerset in England on August 29, 1632, is a British philosopher and political theorist. Rock was educated at the Oxford Christian church, where he followed a traditional classical course and looked at medicine and science studies and gained a medical degree, but his interest in philosophy was again revealed by Descartes' research I woke up. Then he joined the family of Anthony Ashley Cooper and later became the Count of Shaftesbury who was a private doctor at first. John Rock (1632-1704) was a British philosopher who played an important role in the creation of modern philosophical empathism and political liberalism. Rock proposed individual rights and the concept of social contract - the concept of rights and responsibilities of the government is an influential figure of the Enlightenment and the American Revolution. After the civil war ended in 1646, Rock was sent to Westminster School in London at the age of 14. He was a competent student and was chosen as the king's scholar for his academic record - a form of scholarship. But he did not particularly like the time to go to school; later he criticized public schools to emphasize corporate punishment and dry, narrow academic views, the brochure "Thoughts on Education" (1693) wrote. Locke believes that education should not only promote learning of books but also promote good moral and rational development.

In other words, circular reasoning is excluded from justification and the underlying cause is inappropriate due to lack of further reason. If both conditions apply, the chain of causes of some belief can be infinite or infinite. The unrestricted problem is that there are infinite beliefs, regardless of whether they have a potential belief or not. Human has limited thinking and limited life There is no reason to form defense anymore after many doubts. Epistemological skepticism is the lack or justification of knowledge of a particular group of individual propositions (Barnett, 2014). The doubt of all propositions is called global skepticism, which reveals the lack of knowledge (2014). The regression problem is a difficult point of epistemology and one has to be reasonable (2014), since further defense must be inferred in the defense itself. The conclusion of the infinite regression argument is that the individual lacks legitimacy. Epistemological and moral skepticism is a subcategory of theory and its members include Pyronian moral skepticism and doctrinal moral skepticism. All members of epistemologic moral skepticism have two things in common: firstly they acknowledge that it is unreasonable for us to believe in any moral argument. . I believe that the moral skepticism of the Proninian does not make sense why he believes in moral assertion because he believes that moral assertion is truthful or moral assertion is irrational in thinking it is wrong . Therefore, apart from not knowing whether (i) is true or not, the Poronian's moral skepticism is negative (ii). Contracts between reasons and truth epistemology and methods of knowledge production, and questions about different knowledge claims. The problem is what people know. At the heart of this research area is skepticism, many of which involve attempts to refute certain forms of school. In this article we discuss the skepticism of epistemological schools, the creation of contributors to schools, and how the schools developed from there. Skepticism is a questioning point about the validity of some or all of human knowledge. Skepticism does not refer to a specific philosophy school, it refers to clues to many philosophical arguments about epistemology. The first well-known Greek skeptic was Socrates, his only knowledge was that he did not know anything about his resolve. In Indian philosophy, Sanjaya Belatthiputta is a famous skeptic and the Buddhist Madhyamika school is considered a form of skepticism. Descartes' heart and body's most famous survey also began with skepticism movements. Descartes began to question the validity of all knowledge and looked for facts unreliefable. By doing so, he came to his famous motto: I think, so I

The philosophical heritage of society people of the 16th century: their reasonable summary: The doctrine of society represents a reasonable correspondence to the medieval theology based on the authority of the church. They kept the Bible as a super theorem, but the society people reasonably analyzed it and believed that there was nothing to accept. Their social and political ideology condemns participation in war from the tendency of very utopian pacifists, places public and judicial positions in a moderate and realistic position based on mutual love, It has undergone an important evolutionary process of supporting world secular power. Actively participate in society Despite philosophers trying to understand the nature of the energy and matter of millions of times, it was not until the 17th and 18th centuries that people knew how to think systematically about the material world did. If several European philosophers could find a better way of thinking about the world in the 16th and 17th centuries, in the days of unpleasant plague, incineration, inquisition, devastating religious war, and domestic conflict I suggested. A means for the system to discover the truth - we can manage ourselves in a more fair way. Even if not all of us, we can alleviate the sufferings of disease and hunger and improve the living environment of many people. The Renaissance is now basically the 15th and 16th centuries. When you reach the end of the 16th century and the beginning of the 17th century you get out of the renaissance and enter the beginning of modern development as a modern world, especially a unique development. Some people can be traced back to the Renaissance in 1453, but this is ridiculous, so it can be said that it began at noon on Tuesday. This is a basic philosophical attitude that lasted for centuries in the 15th and 16th centuries. In dark and medieval surveys, we have eroded long infertility through faith and strength. Now, we are very happy to see the results of one of the few sunshines in human history. Our happiness will be diluted as we see the power of the next generation of faith and power seeds planted again from the beginning and seeing the power working to eliminate the miracles released during this period. Just after the scientific revolution began (16th and 17th centuries), we can divide contemporary Western philosophical thinking into three gentle and overlapping periods. Early modern philosophy, late modern philosophy, and modern philosophy (most of which can be called "anti") philosophy)). The early modern philosophy began with French rationalist Rene Descartes (1596-1650) and British political philosopher Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679). Descartes is aware of the diversity of beliefs and ideas found throughout the world at the beginning of the exploration and is seeking a new foundation for universally applicable knowledge - the premise of the main sequence of Western thought At least we can go back to Plato. He said he found it with the famous Cogito ("Yes, I am.")

I have become a lifelong learner to improve the skills, abilities and talents God has given me. When people do not conscientious efforts to spread their heart, they are actually deciding to begin puncturing. My wish as a college student is to learn everything you can do with the help of Victory University. It is interesting to read about Rene Descartes who grew up in France. Descartes is also a lifelong learner. He was a philosopher and writer, and he made the word "I think so, so I think so" (Gruck, Mercado, Myers, 2014, p. 7). For the past 18 months, I was keen to develop what kind of person I was. My personal development is brought about by my activities, the discovery and development of passion, learning and intellectual growth, continuous reflection and self-evaluation. I decided what kind of person I would like to be and I took a step forward in this direction. Since I want to express my creativity more, I express my personality and ideas more frequently. I want to be cleverer so read more and seek wisdom and inspiration from professors and mentors. I want to experience more life, so I grab every opportunity, I can do what I want, take more risk My personal growth option is the most important, because in English children can learn to expand their experiences and sympathize with others. Without personal growth, understanding of literature and languages ​​will deepen and it will be very difficult to achieve other models. (Alex) English teachers who evaluate "personal growth" models generally recognize that this will affect practices in two important areas. Firstly, personal relationships and interpersonal relationships are of particular interest. Secondly, an important element in their role is to promote aesthetic responses. In conclusion, in the best English course, the teacher shows the comprehensive knowledge as an individual learner to the students and is devoted to their intelligence, culture and aesthetics. Development (HMI, 2001: 3, highlight) My role as a person means that I am committed to the development of new knowledge. The fact that I am playing a role as a teacher means to encourage students to take personal responsibility for my growth through many learning places. I am responsible for supporting the development of the nursing sector by participating in research and publications to share this knowledge with other people. I have to give examples of how to extend discipline to my students. Our students do not study isolatedly but they continue to evolve through a common curriculum. I am working in a team and I support teachers teaching in places where I am working and elsewhere. Many teachers are accustomed to pursuing knowledge for life, as knowledge development is done in many places.

In interactiveism in Descartes philosophy and spiritual philosophy, the dualism theory that preserves this kind of thought and body is independent, but has a causal relationship. Interactivists insist that spiritual events like John Doe wanting to kick the brick walls may be the cause of the movement of the body, the cause of his legs and feet moving to the wall. On the contrary, the physical event that his foot touches the wall may be the cause of the psychological event that he felt heavy pain. In the 17th century, René Descartes used interaction as a classicistic expression. But in addition to speculating that it will occur in the pineal gland deep within the brain, he can not make a satisfactory explanation of how the interaction will occur. This problem led directly to the accidental nature of Nicolas Malebranche in France from the 17th century to the 18th century and various other explanations about the relationship between the body and the mind. These are the German philosophers from the 17th century to the 18th century - the mathematician Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz's theory, the pre-established harmony between the body and the mind in God's creation, and the 17th century Dutch Jewish Including rejection of dualism by the human rationalist Benedict de Spinoza. Support of monism of mind and body as basic material attributes The interactionist faces two difficulties: (1) Imagine how such two foreign objects interact with each other because the material, the quality of mind, and the quality of the body are fundamentally different It is difficult to do. (2) Physics seems to present a completely unavoidable structure from non-physical areas, as explained mechanically. See also dualism of mind and body. Let me give an example of the comparison mechanism and the interaction of mutual interaction interactions (the influence between people, situation, action). Let me give an example of a mechanical interaction: characteristics, situation, and relationship between context and characteristics. Do you support another viewpoint? Please explain the reason. Please post a response of 200 to 300 words below: Do you think this event changed personality? If it changes your character, how will your personality change? What if that event does not change your personality? Do you think your character depends on environmental impact and genetic influence? The dialogueist view recognizes that the influence of personality depends on the circumstances and the situation is affected by the personality of the existent person. Interactivity also recognizes that people often choose circumstances that reflect their personality. Allan R. Buss, one of many interactive researchers, introduced the idea that people and the situation interact in three different ways. A common example of the interaction between people and the situation is the Stanford Prison Experiment where university students participated. Study on simulation research In the prison environment, some students work as guards and other students work as prisoners. When the security guard became more insulting than expected, the study was over. Because interaction theory is used to study social interactions between different members, the interaction theory is linked to the family system. Based on the theory of interaction theory, families are simply units of personality interaction. Communication, personality, and role play an important role in the family of social systems. Communication plays an important role in the interaction between different members of the family. Since families tend to act based on the meaning of words used for communication, the way the family communicates determines the interaction between them.

In the early nineteenth century after the recession almost eliminated the hope of Europe, there were four elite philosophers who gave a certain degree of faith to the people. New ideas about people and politics quickly emerged and people discussed the ideologies of other people. This is because in the prince, he explained why he dominated by threats compared to rock. It is the only way to maintain control. I believe that people make decisions independently. With a good idea there is a big change. Niccolo Machiavelli, John Locke, Karl Marx are famous philosophers who have paved the way for the most prominent form of government in the world. Through their literature they have created a wave of revolutionary ideas that have existed in several forms of government to date. Meanwhile, Machiavelli insists on political absoluteism. It is a form of governance and rulers accept the power to impart a single ruler who is usually attributed to that animal. However, this does not give us the right to ignore emotions beyond rationality, but other animals do not have the same qualities. Discussion on Rene Descartes 'first philosophy, Nicolo Machiavelli's "Prince" and Thomas Hobbes' Leviathan backed this ideology. Integrating emotions is also the foundation of human existence In the early nineteenth century after the recession almost eliminated the hope of Europe, there were four elite philosophers who gave a certain degree of faith to the people. New ideas about people and politics quickly emerged and people discussed the ideologies of other people. - How will you be successful and become a strong leader? What is the basic basic function? These problems have been raised centuries ago and raised today. Niccolo Machiavelli wrote the most influential paper on leadership but is still used for politics and management. The clear concept he explores is to find the balance between good and justice and practice cautiously chosen fraud and defamation. Throughout history, many philosophers focus on their environment and are looking for ways to solve the social, economic and political problems facing their people. These include Niccolo Machiavelli, John Locke, Karl Marx, Fredrick Engels. The ideas and sentences of each writer were influenced and reflected by the problems they were facing at that time. This difference in temporal environment causes inconsistency between philosopher's views. In this article we will explore the work and environment of each of these philosophers and analyze how each person criticizes others. essay.com/ Chronology and its philosophical solution A comparison of their works with three European thinkers: John Locke, Karl Marx and Fredrick Engels, and Niccolo Machiavelli Chronology Problems and Its Philosophical Solution: Three European Thinkers and Their Authors: John Locke, Karl Marx and Frederic Engels, and Nicolo Machiavelli

As I learned through course studies and lectures, due to my prejudice against Anselm 's ontological debate. I hope that Descartes aside these prejudices, present two articles on his "first meditation" to explore the two aspects of the discussion and try to reach independent conclusions. However, I would like to get the same conclusion as before - that is, ontological arguments can be argued based on fundamental differences between concepts of existence in our minds and concepts of reality I can do it. The ontological debate was first criticized by Gaunilo of Modern Marmoutiers of Canterbury Anselm. He believes that ontological arguments can be used to prove the existence of something using full island analogies. This discussion was also criticized by famous Catholic philosophers Thomas Aquinas, David Hume and Emmanuel Kant. In order to correctly understand ontological arguments, it is necessary to identify the meaning of philosophers when talking about 'possible world'. "Possible world" may refer to facts contrary to facts. For those in "a possible world", it simply means that its existence is logically possible. Perhaps the most complicated and challenging argument for the existence of God is an ontological argument proposed by Anselm of Canterbury. According to Anselm, God exists in God with the most perfect concept of existence - the existence which can not be imagined - because there are essentially perfect and nonexistent beings as large as existence. Everything is perfect, no one exists. This discussion has a lasting influence on philosophers; some believe it will try to 'define' the existence of God while others keep it and continue developing a new version I will. Ontological arguments are transcendental arguments. These arguments try to prove the existence of God from the meaning of the word God. Anselm of Canterbury introduced an ontological argument to his work 'Proslogion'. The classic argument of Anselm is based on two principles, the most important of which are St. Anselm and Rene de Carte of the above Canterbury. If he does not exist you can still think of a larger being (as you said that there is no God other than this existence). Presence must be one of the attributes of God. Because by removing it it is still possible for you to understand the bigger god (the god that exists). The most common problem with this discussion is that it only seems to enumerate the existence of God's attributes and does not seem to indicate it. This argument seems to indicate that any fact you can imagine should be true.

Using innate knowledge is a mystery that disrupts the knowledgeable male and female generation and denies the ability to present certain actual knowledge like casserol shared by family and company picnics. Everyone enters inside, you can realize understanding of the substance from the resource without having physical knowledge, and you can make your knowledge the same. According to the advanced English dictionary, knowledge is "psychological result of perception, learning and reasoning", the mind is "a place responsible for my thought and emotion, a place of reasonable ability", and the last knowledge is "knowledge The body of the mind to decide ". Rationalist: I believe rationalists have natural knowledge; their difference is that they choose different innate knowledge objects. Plato is a rationalist, believing that we understand the shape naturally, because he believes that Descartes understands God's thought, or perfection and infinity, and my own existence. Born; Nom Chomsky believes that the ability to use language (such as language rules) is congenital. 1. Empiricism is simpler: compared to empiricism, rationalism also has existing entities. That is congenital knowledge. According to the empiricist, the innate knowledge is unobservable and ineffective, that is, I do not do anything. Knowledge is there and may never be used. Using Occam's razor (a simple theory is better when deciding the competition theory to explain the same phenomenon), one empiricism is a better theory. Chomsky's view of talent: If one thinks that language is their way of doing things due to my natural language knowledge, this natural language knowledge theory can serve as a theory about any language at the same time. What language theory. Why are they doing this? But surprisingly, many linguists rejecting Chomsky's talent seem to implicitly accept Chomsky's view that a single theory fulfills both theoretical goals. In particular, although many functionalists came up with various explanations on why the language is completely different from the language of Chomsky, they often describe the language as a problem in the field of formal linguists who describe the description theory I see. Problems are confused to explain theoretical problems In Chomsky's view, language ability includes innate knowledge of various language rules, constraints, and principles, and this congenital knowledge constitutes the "initial state" of language ability. Dialogue with the language experiences of a childhood person - when it comes to touching what Chomsky calls "first language data" or "pld", it creates new things. The language knowledge system, knowledge A specific language (such as Chinese or English). The state of this "reached" or "final" language ability constitutes the "language ability" of a person and includes knowledge of language grammar. According to Mr. Chomsky, this knowledge is important for the ability to speak and understand language (which of course is not enough, it will help to further improve "language performance"). Knowledge, use of actual language)

Everyone has a different definition about what makes anyone a leader. My definition is not a requirement description, but a set of functions. I need a strong, independent, reliable, open, thoughtful, selfless, intelligent and creative person for this. I believe that I know who I am and I understand my ethics. Some leaders may know their leadership philosophy, but a few have written the characteristics of these leadership. To convey your personal leadership philosophy (PLP), Calvert explains the meaning of PLP and creates a phased process to build PLP with bold verbs. Successful leaders know their personal leadership philosophy (PLP) and convey it through daily life and all enthusiasm. They take time to decide who they are and their values ​​and priorities. They understood their routes and installed internal compasses. It provides them with more self-awareness, greater self-confidence, and higher leadership efficiency. This is by writing a personal leadership philosophy that describes the core values ​​you live in, your expectations for employees, their expectations on you, and how you assess performance It will be achieved. Leadership philosophy provides insight into how you think about leadership, values, attributes, and expectations. Your leadership philosophy reflects your importance as a leader so you will use it as a basis for others to understand what you expect from you as your position and leader. This is what you choose. Without the leadership philosophy, it will be an "accidental" philosophy. Through leadership philosophy, you can make a thoughtful and conscious choice based on reflections and decisions. Leadership philosophy is about enough. Some of them are clear and easy to understand, others are a series of common buzzwords. Since leadership is targeted at people, the philosophy of leadership always provides insight into individual individual concepts. Sundar Pichai has found a very simple and positive idea for himself and Google to move many people to a new job. The combination of leadership and philosophy may seem odd. On the surface, these terms seem to be almost uncommon. So what does the leadership philosophy mean? To understand it, we recommend that you check the two words separately. Because you can understand how they work together to provide leadership guidance. When you think about philosophy, you may first think of the greatest thinkers of our time like Voltaire, Plato, and Descartes. Furthermore, I may not have considered studying philosophy in my daily life, and it may be a bit difficult to understand concepts and ideas. However, as one of the oldest fields in the world, philosophy has many choices. Whether you think consciously is part of our daily life.

The concept of dreaming is always psychological, but there are philosophical aspects as well. Descartes once said "I can dream as far as I know" (Bruder / Moore, Philosophy, 81). This speculation of Descatres is speculation that explains the concept of a dream. He asked a question, how can we learn that we are not dreaming, and our entire life is just a dream. There is no answer to this question, but it proves the philosophical view of dreams. A dream is a type of psychological activity that occurs during sleep. There is the only solution to this dilemma: not just a dream - but a good dream. The problem is not whether we dream of it or not. But are we going to do better? The truth is that not all dreams are equal. There are beautiful dreams and bad dreams. Some dreams will bring out our possibilities to the fullest. And let me dream of true self-sleep. The purpose of this book is to explain these differences. Dream art is made up of four elements. It is wonderful, noble, beautiful, and to learn how to have a real dream. You will find that these four characteristics are ubiquitous due to all the most memorable dreams in history. They really distinguish between unusual dreams and mediocre dreams. History is full of shadow dreams. How nice. Like many tyrants, Hitler's dream is wonderful. The same can be said for Mao Zedong. Stalin It takes care of everyone. That's always about everyone. Also, this is not a dream. This is worse than a bad dream. To be very great is not enough to make people dream. The great monsters of history have been dominated by their shadows. When we combine great pursuit with shadow darkness, we never forge dreams: we summon a nightmare. Remember Herbert Spencer 's dream. As a founder of social Darwinism, I think Spencer should be removed from "weak" society. For him, the weak are disabled, weak, deformed, and mentally ill. Why does Spencer support eugenics? He believes it can eliminate impurities, contamination and weaknesses in the gene pool. So I will make everyone healthy in the future Spencer's dream did not pass the test of nobility like most of the tyranny's dream. A wonderful dream is focused on every life. But that does not necessarily satisfy our lives. Spencer's dream is a much more novel counter example than Hitler, Mao Zedong, Stalin's aristocracy. It presents subtle and difficult calculus, so when we ask what we are improving our life we ​​need to learn to grow. I can not recommend murder, torture, intimidation. But doing so makes us closer to understanding what nobility is.

Susan Bordo Susan Bordo is the author of 'Ad hunger as ideology' talking about advertising and ways to present men and women's food in various ways. Whether it is eating it, cooking, body shape and size. Bordo's ideology is that advertisers use women's anxiety to allow women to eat and eat alone while men consume a lot of food. The real problem here is whether Bordeaux ideology will hinder advertising. Advertisers who promise "slimming" and "control" behind the various advertising Mirage hide the meaning of attracting female customers. When considering these images, please read the excerpt of Susan Bordo's book "Male body", where Bordo thinks of rethinking the body of men with modern advertisements from Calvin Klein and a company like Gucci I will. For Calvin Klein ads, please see another page. February 23: In this course, it is impossible to systematically study gender in Western culture and art. So, I would like to greatly improve our work from the art of ancient Greece until the beginning of the 15th century. What I would like to consider is a calendar illustration of Torres' wealth, a prayer book for the French family royal family Jean de Berry. When the Duke died in 1416, the manuscript was not completed. Illustration studies show how it became a good bridge between the Middle Ages and the Renaissance. Susan Bordo is Otis A. Singletary Humanities of Humanities, University of Kentucky. She is also a philosopher dealing with many traditional aspects of philosophy like Descartes and Sigmund Freud. However, Bordo is different from most other philosophers in research and training on 'popular culture and physical expression'. Not only did she write a philosopher, Plato, she also wrote about Madonna and O. J (Bordo 138). Most of Bordo's work as a teacher involves expressing the body of women in marketing and advertising. She believes that the majority of the past and present increase gender identity and believe that "... the expression of a woman's body is truth" or "real", "natural" or "ordinary" (Bordo 138-39 ). Feminist philosopher Susan Bordo regret the obsession of western media for thinness and diet of women. Her basic complaint is that more and more women around the world are considered obese and need to take diet. Bordo cited the Fiji Islands as an example. "These islands did not report cases of eating disorders until the appearance of television in 1995. In 1998, programs in the United States and Britain began broadcasting there three years later, a diet report (149-50) Bordo's point of view is that Western diet worship spreads even to the remote areas of the world, after all, Bordo says that diet culture will find you no matter where you live Bordo 's view is correct to me, now I think it, many women I know are concerned about their weight, no matter where they come from. .

Social problems are problems that affect human society as a whole. Human behavior, including government policies, religious conflict, gender inequality, economic differences, etc., are involved in these issues. Health problems are caused by an increase in the number of people discovered each year due to life-threatening diseases such as cancer and AIDS. This social problem can only be dealt with if other problems such as healthcare reforms are dealt with properly. Today's society faces many adolescent problems, from increased alcohol dependence to eating disorders, high levels of adolescence stress. According to "Mother's Drinking Driving Website Opposition", in the United States, about 8 young people died each day due to drunk driving. The violence faced by young people is also very high, and one in two of rape victims is under 18 years of age (statistical data provided by Ministry of Justice) Women's problems like rights, privileges, and compensation packages similar to men are social problems unique to gender facing American women. According to the US Department of Labor, 46.8% of the total working population in the United States is women, and by 2018 46.9% is estimated to be women. According to the US Department of Labor, as of September 2010, the unemployment rate has risen to 60% in the current economic downturn. In the average from 1948 to 2010, the unemployment rate in the United States is only 70%. As a result, the number of unemployed has increased significantly in the past few months and is one of the social problems that needs to be solved today. These are some big social problems that exist in today's society. In order to solve these problems with firm confidence, we need to make efforts at individual, domestic, international, and political levels. Introduction Social problems are described as errors in today's society, broad and variable problems. The type of condition that people think needs to change. Poverty is a serious social problem in today's society. According to Peilin (2012), poverty brings difficulties for families and individuals, and politics adversely affect social stability and social development, posing a serious threat to human security (p. 243). - ... Charles Pierce believes that "only language, logic, and practical signs can be regarded as human tools and objects for the natural world." (Kremer) Descartes doubt for that reason Reason for behavioral irritation In a society full of inequality and inequity, Shakespeare's view on these social issues is still relevant today. Through Othello, Shakespeare has not only challenged Elizabethan society's retrograde mood, but also comments on issues that bother the modern society. As we all know, Shake Spear transcends his age and argues concepts such as gender equality and racial discrimination before these terms are established even in society. Through this drama, he criticized internal prejudice and potential social pressure in the Elizabethan era, challenged the emotions held by the wider society, and commented on the state of the modern world. Shakespeare is definitely a progressive thinker In this course, the author learned about various social problems of society as a whole. Some of these issues include views on race and culture, poverty, social inequality, urbanization, and so on. After discussing all these issues, the authors chose to complete his last duties on racial discrimination and Hispanic Americans. - When the discrimination problem becomes a reality, the common types that come to mind are class, race, and gender discrimination. However, discrimination based on the appearance in the workplace is becoming an increasing problem in the United States. Discrimination based on appearance is different from other forms because it can be used for discrimination against a wide range of people.

Whether there is a mind, there is no body. Do not worry, whether the body exists. Of course, there is an artificial way to keep the body alive, even if it is declared that the brain is dead in this age. Likewise, the body can be completely fixed and put into a coma, but the mind can still be alive and active. However, it may itself exist in fact, its function is performed as usual, and still as a partner. Descartes will analyze the mind and body into two completely different, independent entities in his book "Methodology and Discussion on Thinking in the First Philosophy". Please tell me what I think about the body and why do I want to catch them. There are many philosophical literature on the relationship between physical and spiritual relationships and personal identity. I am not planning to propose a philosophically sound or comprehensive personal identity statement here. I am here only to outline personal reasons for my own opinion. I think that we are different from our body in at least a morally meaningful meaning. Our body is a complex machine that supports our conscious and subconscious lives. However, our spiritual life constitutes ourselves and is not a machine to support it. I am thinking of myself. My body allows my mind to express myself and shape myself, but my body and mind are different. For centuries, we have tried to understand the physical and mental relationships of people. The difficulty behind explaining the spiritual and physical relationship of a person is that he is a dynamic entity. Therefore, people are in continuous mode to understand themselves. Some thinkers believe that people are composed of body and mind. At the same time, there are thinkers against this view. Let's explain the views of several philosophers. Some of the ancient philosophers are expressing their views on their physical and mental relationships like Plato and Aristotle. For Plato, human beings are made up of the body and the soul. The body is only a prison where his / her soul is trapped. His understanding differs from our people's understanding. For Plato, people belong to an understandable world, and humans belong to a wise world. People are at least both mind and body. If you think that the mind is placed in the brain, the soul's problem and the spiritual matter are often considered to be the same, but even if there is a causal relationship between the writer and the philosopher, I distinguish it. . I would like to add that the mind is not necessarily a single structure. If you are fed up with some or all of our poisoning many of you, your idea that we may replace your voluntary ability will be affected by your poisoning priorities. For example, if you are a smoker, smoking is more important than celebrating your heart, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, or your child's birthday party, next to your deceased relatives It is under the bondage of dependence - even if your body is at an imminent physical danger or risk, that is, even if you make smoking cessation difficult, that is, illness, cancer, pregnancy

I can find myself thinking about this novel, Persepolis. Marjane speaks to God as a young girl. She acknowledges her desire and dreams of him. God is comforting Marjane very much, just as she covers and protects her blanket at night. Again, this novel is similar to the relationship between me and Jesus. Throughout my life, Jesus was my blanket and I was hid. Thanks to the poem "The Way It Is", I was able to think about how to use a thread. They are more than just threads and ropes. Immediately, I think that covering my blanket and protecting it will consist of thousands of threads. I decided that it is indeed the voice of God, the Holy Spirit, or the angel and I fully believe in the protection of the God of my family. "God did not give me the spirit of fear, it did not give power" I have been thinking about the rest of the day (NLT 2 Timothy 1: 7). Indeed, I am still confused about this case and there is no clear answer. In that moment, please inform me to my belief deeply. This is a mysterious poem. The idea seems to be only the reason I know that God is not a liar, I can believe the clarity and clarity of the idea presented by my wisdom. To understand everything depends on the knowledge of God. This raises the problem of the name of the famous Descartes with two sides. First of all, knowing the existence and nature of self, the nature of matter, and the nature of God depends on understanding God without deceit. In this case, how do the thinkers make conclusions about these topics before they know the god without deception? This aspect of the problem was raised by Mason on the second dispute. Some people say "I trust God rather than people", but I will say "I trust God and believe in people". But this is not blind faith, but trust in Christ. It seems reasonable to trust people based on their achievements, but this should not be so when contacting, serving or training personnel. We should see them in a way that Jesus saw them in the Bible. We should accept and accept them not only in the present broken state but also in the future of Jesus Christ in the future. It was redeemed and loved by God. If we see people from this perspective, we will not judge so much, I think that it will be more emphasized and compassionate. That is an important part of building a real relationship. Look at how Jesus saw the people in the Bible; He acknowledged their past and present broken state, but he did not explain in detail. Children

According to the suicide National Institute of Mental Health seen from the eyes of Kant and Hume, "In 2007, [suicide] was the tenth most death cause in the United States and 34,598 people died." Although numbers are small, it is common for people around you to commit suicide, but this is a big problem (NIMH). About suicide, various emotions and opinions are mixed. Some people choose to believe this is the state of mind that will make people feel suicide. Kant argues that Hume 's view is that mathematical propositions are analyzed? It is totally different. ~ 1 1 If Hume uses Kant's term when discussing Hume, it means that the knowledge of mathematics is a priori! Indeed, as we learned from paragraph 2, this term is not strange for Hume; for CeUsal, Hume says. Regardless of any exception, knowledge of this relationship can not be obtained by a priori reasoning under any circumstances, but when it is found that specific objectives are often combined with each other, is. Make sure that things are presented to those with strong natural rationality and ability; if things are new to him, he will cause some cause or influence by the most accurate test of his reasonable quality You will not be able to find it either. (E 2 7) It is mathematics to rest here The reading I chose from Hume and Kant represents their final view on art philosophy. Hume's taste paper is his last philosophical writing, its existence is coincidental. Hume provided this article when his publisher suggested that his articles about suicide and immortality might be sued, but hoped to fill the gap in a series of articles. Kant read some of Hume's translated works, but Kant never read "preference of preference". Some of the paragraphs of "criminal criticism" sound like a reaction to Hume, which is due to their common influence in British tradition, and an understanding of beauty as a taste. Both studied the work of Shaftesbury's third work Anthony Cooper (1671-1713). They insist that we were born in "introverted eyes" which are particularly suitable for aesthetic sense. From the point of view of Aristotle (or French fries), the uniqueness of the Cant method is not special. As he copes with Hume, Kant is close to this as he did, and one of Hume's first challenges is the origin of "thinking". The problem of the first principle relates to the legitimacy of the proposition, but Hume's empirical approach can be traced back to the first question of the validity of the concepts making up the proposition. Rationalists do not worry about this. For Descartes, any concept that can be considered "clearly and clearly" can be used without hesitation or without doubt. Because the empathicist wants to track all "thoughts" back to experience, we are beginning to ask for credentials certificates.

In the powerful article PT Greach, the problem we face is whether the Christ understands him, whether God is omnipotent, or the true definition of that word and its understanding of English In order to be omnipotent or not. He proved that God is omnipotent, which means he can do anything, it is wrong. He proves this statement with the importance of the stability of Christian faith and a statement contradictory to the overall view of the concept of God. Alm omnipotence is one of God's traditional attributes. Under normal usage, God is omnipotent, that is, God is "all power" or God (in a sense) "anything". However, it is satisfactory that a satisfactory analysis is well known. The concept of almighty. For example, it is widely believed that totipotency must limit what logically brings. In other words, he says that God can do logically viable but logically impossible, he said he can not make a square circle and can not say it Told. 2 and 2 are 5 Cartes. Descartes, however, clearly denied this argument and believed that the totipotency of God is an unconditional logical possibility. Another question about God's almighty argument is related to whether God can sin Is there a logically possible world that Almighty people commit crimes? If the Almighty is God, is not it so if the Almighty is someone other than God? What if you can not instantiate with a wonderful existence (GB) instead of a GCB? Since GB does not have to have all well-formed properties, we can imagine a GB that has excellent properties of omnidirectionality, not excellent nature of omnidirectionality. It is logical that such a person is logistically likely to commit crime, so allowing him to accomplish the fact that he did and actually committing a crime. By studying the attribute of totipotency without resorting to omni - directionality, you can see that omnipotent people who own it possess the ability to realize the world where they do evil. However, if the GCB is not omnipotent, he is not a GCB. Because the GCB needs to have all excellent attributes including totipotency. The theory is clearly wrong How many lives can you have omnipotential property? Only one person can possess omnipotent property, for the simple reason that it can include power to realize a world where coincident existence (except myself) is all destroyed. If universality is materialized in two lives then it is possible for all other coincidental lives to become destroyed persons and B will hold all the other coincidental lives. Each person will prevent you from achieving what you want. But it is impossible to prevent omnipotent people from exercising their powers to achieve logical events. The only way to avoid this paradox is to avoid the world where multiple people are omnipotent. If the world materializes totipotency, it can be materialized by a single existence.

In Nichomeachean ethics, Aristotle tries to define happiness. It brings many other questions that lead to a final problem: what is the meaning of life? Although all Aristotle's ideas are interesting and important, we will only cover ideas related to role analysis. As with mobility, the best experience is that Aristotle draws a thin line between activities and objectives, both as a means and purpose, and as a means and purpose, but the ultimate purpose is the end of the means itself about it. In "Myth of Sisyphus", Albert Camus shows that life has no final meaning, but human beings on Earth have not been achieved, but still can be happy. This idea is indicated by the story of an absurd hero who has been forever associated with all human goals in their lives. By linking this myth and the real world, Camus expressed his view on existentialism. The meaning of Sisyphus constantly is the same as what women frequently do in life; it means no. Sisyphus was forced to roll a heavy rock on the hill. This is like human life, and men and women will not do anything through all activities and events in human life. People work hard and try to achieve their goals, but these goals are meaningless throughout the lives that make up life. In "Myth of Sisyphus" (1942), Albert Camas used an analogy of Greek mythology of Sisyphus (he was accused to roll it all round to roll the stone forever forever). To explain the meaninglessness of existence, it indicates that Sisyphus finally found meaning and purpose in his mission by constantly applying himself to it. Most people think that Sartre is an excellent existentialist, but many are important and innovative philosophers themselves, but others do not have much impression of his contribution. Heidegger himself believed that Sartre took his work and just put it back to the subject-oriented philosophy of Descartes and Husserl. In "Myth of Sisyphus", Albert Camus believes that happiness of Sisyphus comes from his perfect understanding of his birth. Ridiculously the hero's Sisyphus desperately stoned a stone to the top of the mountain for "contempt for God, hatred of death, and love for life". Camus also believes that happiness and absurdity are both sides of the same coin. His conscious not only made this story a tragedy, he gave him happiness. As he notices absurd behind torture, he will no longer be afraid to become a master of his destiny. Contempt for his fate made him win

The powerful information of Beckett at that time was a drama in which the age of Samuel Becket deeply delved into the human mind. And the audience was able to understand the potential impacts and consequences of the continuing lives of the past. The lack of punctuation and fragmentation make it difficult to master the game, but it effectively reflects the purpose of Beckett in this work. In that era, Beckett dramatically exemplified some general degeneracy of human nature dramatically. And it eventually worked as a disadvantage to the mind, for example the constant avoidance analysis and the current evasion in the past obsessions Samuel Becket's final game In the sun and laughter shelter, Samuel Beckett's terminator family has a hard time finding their own world niche. In terms of physical and emotional aspects, ham can let others surround him. Clov, the healthiest family in the body, also has the power that can not be defined late at Hamm. Ham's elderly parents, Nag and Nell have memory. Sometimes it seems weaker than others, but hum, crew, Nag and Nell have a source of power that leads to weak coexistence of family dynamics. Samuel Beckett's "Endgame" is a complex political analysis that looks like a non-political and empty world. Because Hamm and Kloof lived under the influence of Marxism, they showed the features of bourgeoisie and proletariat respectively, but they only kept them so that they could be defined as something. This work implicitly defines - through the environment, and Hamm and Kloof as bourgeoisie and proletariat - the political base is just human rationalization, contrary to the pointless world, contrary to Beckett's existential nihilism Ideological information to point I believe that understanding this handwriting technique has extensive relationship with Beckett's third novel "Watt". In his another letter, Beckett merely wrote it as a movement simply written to kill time between World War II and Parisian occupation, which was written in "spotting", in particular at himself Wat's early critic who deteriorates Wat's appearance seems to have internalized the philosophy of René Descartes, and as he analyzed his experience according to the ruthless Cartesian logic that eventually is debilitating and interesting wrote. It is absurd. Watann seems unable to think, he can only count. One thing in the novel is that Mr. Watt was hired by Mr. Knott and left cooking in the empty room to serve his dinner and then Mr. Knut had already eaten his dinner, I did not eat or had all of this

Doña Josefa Ortiz de Dominguez is a Mexican patriot, heroine of the Mexican independence warfare, when she discovered the Queretaro independence plot against the rebel army, she became famous in history. Thanks to her, Father Miguel Hidalgo advanced the date of the independence campaign beginning early September 16, 1810. If you do not notice it soon, you will find a struggle for independence, and the conspirators' efforts will not be there in any case. We achieved their ultimate goal: Mexico is independent of the Spanish royal family Maria de la Natividad Giron Josefa Ortiz is most famous for Doña Josefa Ortiz de Dominguez of Queretaro's "La Corregidora" (Supreme Court). She is the daughter of Spanish Juan Jose Ortiz and Maria Manuela Giron. She was born in Valladolid - Now Morelia - and grew up in Mexico City in 1768. Her parents passed away as she was a child, so her older sister Maria Sotero received custody. Maria recruited her sister at the very famous school Collegeo de las Visquinas. She was born in Spain in New Spain because she was Creole. She was still a college student but she met Miguel Dominguez who often visited her school. They fell in love, secretly married in 1791; they have 14 children. As Secretary of the High Court, Miguel Dominguez was appointed a magistrate of Queretaro County in 1802. They soon won the sympathy of Queretaro society at the time and joined various social groups. As everyone knows, Doña Josefa is a Spaniard - a Spanish born in Europe - considering local people and strongly opposed to think of them as second-class citizens. She has always been conscious of local people's social problems as they were driven to the secondary position of the administration and military. Her parents Juan José Ortiz and Manuela Girón de Ortiz died soon after her birth. Joseph was brought up by her sister. After receiving education at the famous Colegio de las Vizcainas, I graduated in 1791 and married Miguel Dominguez. They went to Queretaro where the husband was assigned to the duties. Queretaro is the main venue for independence movement and Joseph plays his historical role in the right place. Joseph has a pure Spanish lineage, but like many Creole elites she despises the Spaniards born in Spain and they show a very arrogant attitude towards Creole. Her anti - Spanish attitude also comes from her participation in the literary circle. On that day, privileged Creole organization was custom. They smuggled the works of Voltaire, Rousseau and Descartes, they were banned by the church and made intense debate. These literary societies soon became political society. The most important is Queretaro. It all began with the conspiracy of Queretaro, once condemned, and impaired the revolutionary plan of the Mexican revolution. Under the skill of Miguel Dominguez and his wife Dona Joseph Ortiz (to become an independent heroin), the leader pretends to be a literacy academy. The plan included the formation of major cities, the meeting endorsed the nonconformity with the Spanish royal family, rejected the new Spanish idea under France, declared independence at the same time, kicked out the peninsula, kicked out the peninsula as a governor, Fernandez VII Approve, and each state will hold a rally

In history, science and religion have always opposed. The state of mind is based on knowledge, observation and experiment. But religion has virtually no evidence, it is entirely based on beliefs and emotions. The problem between these two themes is that one person has factual evidence and one does not have one. Science can explain the law of gravity - if a project is destroyed, it will fall. Religion can explain the experiences of singles with supernatural existence. Another problem between science and religion is the existence of God. The field of physics represents the universe with a relatively simple concept. The interpretation of cosmic dynamics provided by physics may not seem simple, but as you learn more physics, the structure of the universe seems to be increasingly simplified. But theorists assume that infinite complex gods are necessary to explain the simple structural universe. Descartes believes that God is a very complex existence with totipotency and omniscience. Theist's position replaces the question "How did we come here in our simple universe?" Interpretation is more likely than a complicated interpretation (Britannica Encyclopedia Online) "How did a very complex God come here?" Science principal excluded God. Kai One way to distinguish between science and religion is to scientifically focus on the natural world, focusing on the natural world and the scientifically supernatural world. Scientific interpretation never attracts supernatural entities like God and angels (does not drop), unnatural forces (miracles, karma, mind, etc). For example, neuroscientists often do not refer to non-material souls and spirits but explain our ideas using the state of the brain. Naturalists distinguish between methodological naturalism, the limits of scientific exploration, the natural substance and the epistemological principle of law, and the ontological or philosophical naturalism, the metaphysical principle that rejects supernatural (Forrest 2000 ). Methodological naturalism does not say anything about the existence of supernatural entities, as it contains scientific practices (including the types of entities and processes that are specifically cited). In addition to the boundary between science and fake science, the philosophical reflection of false science brings to other interesting problem areas. Examples include the boundary between science and religion, the relationship between science and reliable nonscientific knowledge (such as everyday knowledge), the extent of science education and rational simplification of science, and the nature and logic of scientific methodology naturalism There is a rationale (Boudry et al. 2010), and the meaning of the concept of paranormal or meaningless. Some of these problem areas have not attracted much philosophical attention

Gravity is one of the four basic forces of the universe. Lord Isaac Newton was able to describe it mathematically in 1687 (Eddington 93), but its basic principle was not supported by scientists. Gravity plays an important role in everyday behavior, as it will not move (and moves infinitely because there is no power to stop it) without gravity unless you apply force. Perhaps the perfect place to start is a simple project like Apple (after all, it is the creativity of "start Newton"). After a long absence, in the 1600s, Sir Isaac Newton developed the law of gravity and motion. Newton pointed out in his third movement that "all actions involve equally opposite reactions." The rocket is active under this principle. Continuous injection of hot air in one direction will move the rocket in the opposite direction. This will establish the basic principles necessary for space flight. Even with these basic principles, the first person was not sent to outer space until 1961. Russian astronaut Yuri Gagarrian completed complete trajectory around the earth on April 12th. On June 16, 1963, another Russian astronaut Valentina Tereshkova became the first woman to enter the universe. She flew 48 times around the globe. There were many scientific activities in the 1600s. British scientist Sir Isaac Newton published the mathematical principle of his natural philosophy. He developed three laws of motion and universal gravity law based on Galileo and Descartes' research. He also invented a new mathematical form called calculus. Scientists are beginning to understand that the fever can work. James Joule and a British physicist devised a method to calculate how much heat can be done. Later on, some physicists proposed the law of conservation of energy (they can neither produce nor destroy energy, but can only change from one form to another). In the early 1800's, the theory was developed as light in the form of waves. Physicists believe this Isaac Newton (1642-1727) is a British mathematician and physicist who built the foundations of classical mechanics and calculus. According to the data of the Isaac Newton Institute of Mathematical Sciences, Newton developed the law of motion and the law of universal gravity to deepen the understanding of the world of Copernicus. Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826) was the founder of the United States, was deeply influenced by the philosophy of enlightenment and spent several years in France. According to Thomas Jefferson Foundation he wrote an independent declaration that emphasizes enlightenment (freedom, basic human rights, peace, etc.) (not slaves).

The scientific revolution brought about a new major change. People started to see different things. So far religion has become a matter of pure faith. People can not use some reason, based on empirical proof data or development or religious ideas. A person who was regarded as a contradiction of the church or a pagan and punished. Earth is the center of all around it: at this time it is thought that there is a celestial theory of the universe. Because this theory and other churches to support objections, it is not an advocate of change. With the integration of new ideas, faith and reason, Copernicus and Galileo slowly display more content ...... He engages in physics, mathematics, astronomy and is Catholic strong. Galileo began to engage in the cause of religion, but in mathematics, immediately get interested. In addition to support of Galileo, adding Copernicus's hypothesis, in many other ways and well-known. First, he developed a better scientific way, not only started him, but also theory, but also provided evidence based on empirical data. He actually started "running" the experiment which is not just a theory. He was a great mathematician and scientist, and to ensure full compliance with his theory of evidence. For several reasons, he believed in a reliable Giant Dynasty theory rather than the Paleontological theory. His views are much stronger than Copernicus and public statements. He expressed his view that it was in 1632 in the widely read book "The Dialogue of Two Chief World Systems". They think that it violates the church and the Bible, so the church tried him as a heretic. The church told him that if he wanted to avoid punishment, he had to give up all thought. Initially, he insisted on his beliefs and he did not act on the heresy because he had any objection sutra. Galileo said that the Bible does not explain the sole purpose of any scientific content, the text is preserved. In the letter to Prince Christina's letter, he said: "Because of the Holy Spirit Church officials are well-known that Galileo made such a confession, but that did not come to a conclusion! Copernicus' theory, since the credibility of the so-called Copernicus revolution trigger Galileo increased. "Reliability" related to the increasingly widely accepted possibility of the theory of the earth movement, inducing people to the belief-related beliefs related to reservations of the material world, opened by consideration of the proposed "scientific" explanation material world. People are more willing to accept the perspectives of the scientific theory that they put forward, but to continue to receive a long-standing view of religion Scientists, like Galileo, Copernicus, Descartes and Bacon, during the scientific revolution, as God, human ability and the possibility of understanding the world are discussed. Ultimately, the significance of the new scientific discovery has come to influence people's thinking and behavior in Europe. Society began to question the authority of traditional knowledge about the universe. In turn, they question the traditional idea of ​​the concept of state and social order. Scientific revolution, "Medieval to human's mind emphasizing the eternal world of God has not shifted the management of the human, the universe and the natural world, this method is a knowledge and understanding of the natural law of unchangeable origin The truth is accepted and has nothing to do with it, "scientists have changed the view of the people of the world

Over the years, European society has relied on religion to answer most of their questions. But the age of enlightenment was when the Europeans opened the light and made everyone think in a new way. Age of Enlightenment is an era when philosophers promote logic and reason and answer questions to society. These thinkers do not mind about the afterlife, only care about secular views. In addition, philosophy is very important in enlightenment, the most influential philosophers are Montesquieu, Voltaire and Rousseau. Age of Enlightenment is an age of scientific awakening, and Age of Enlightenment is mainly developed in France. The starting point of enlightenment is John Rock's book on human understanding. Enlightenment attacked the leaders of the church and focused on the problems that had been avoided in the past. Trying to challenge the church takes courage. As the Church said, enlightenment questioned people such as "Earth is the center of the universe". There are four major areas of transformation: religion, intellectuals, economics, and politics. From the Middle Ages to Enlightenment and the 19th century, along with enlightenment and the 19th century, the evolution of knowledge has changed drastically. From the 17th century to the 18th and 19th centuries, the age of enlightenment was thought to be a cultural movement of intellectuals. It also began spreading to American colonies on continental Europe. This is by purpose https://www.studymode.com/subjects/which-labels-for-the-middle-ages-best-describe-the-era-between-500-and-1400-in-europe-the-dark-ages- Europe's most faithful, or oldest feudal age of the golden era - page 1. Html "The labels of the Middle Ages best describe the European Dark Ages from 500 to 1400, or the feudalism era of the European Golden Age," theses and research papers Okay, men and girls, ready to enlightenment In this lesson I will introduce enlightenment. what is that? Enlightenment, sometimes called the era of enlightenment, was an intellectual movement from the late 17th century to the early 18th century, emphasizing reasons, individualism, and skepticism. Enlightenment challenged the traditional religious view. Because that was such a wide movement, enlightenment did not have an accurate start date. It did not pop up, but it gradually developed. Most historians came to the beginning of enlightenment from the mid 17th century to the beginning of the 18th century. The work of intellectuals like Rene Descartes, Barus Spinoza, Isaac Newton is particularly important for the creation of enlightenment. Jean-Baptiste Poquelin Moliere wrote Tartuffe at the beginning of Age of Enlightenment. A big feature of Age of Enlightenment was promotion of rationality, not emotion to make a decision. The enlightenment leaders truly believe that if people do this, the world will be better. In Tartuf, when a character makes a decision using his emotions, they feel that they are in a bad state. And those who make them rule over their emotions

Susan Bordo Susan Bordo is the author of 'Ad hunger as ideology' talking about advertising and ways to present men and women's food in various ways. Whether it is eating it, cooking, body shape and size. Bordo's ideology is that advertisers use women's anxiety to allow women to eat and eat alone while men consume a lot of food. The real problem here is whether Bordeaux ideology will hinder advertising. Advertisers who promise "slimming" and "control" behind the various advertising Mirage hide the meaning of attracting female customers. When considering these images, please read the excerpt of Susan Bordo's book "Male body", where Bordo thinks of rethinking the body of men with modern advertisements from Calvin Klein and a company like Gucci I will. For Calvin Klein ads, please see another page. February 23: In this course, it is impossible to systematically study gender in Western culture and art. So, I would like to greatly improve our work from the art of ancient Greece until the beginning of the 15th century. What I would like to consider is a calendar illustration of Torres' wealth, a prayer book for the French family royal family Jean de Berry. When the Duke died in 1416, the manuscript was not completed. Illustration studies show how it became a good bridge between the Middle Ages and the Renaissance. Susan Bordo is Otis A. Singletary Humanities of Humanities, University of Kentucky. She is also a philosopher dealing with many traditional aspects of philosophy like Descartes and Sigmund Freud. However, Bordo is different from most other philosophers in research and training on 'popular culture and physical expression'. Not only did she write a philosopher, Plato, she also wrote about Madonna and O. J (Bordo 138). Most of Bordo's work as a teacher involves expressing the body of women in marketing and advertising. She believes that the majority of the past and present increase gender identity and believe that "... the expression of a woman's body is truth" or "real", "natural" or "ordinary" (Bordo 138-39 ). Feminist philosopher Susan Bordo regret the obsession of western media for thinness and diet of women. Her basic complaint is that more and more women around the world are considered obese and need to take diet. Bordo cited the Fiji Islands as an example. "These islands did not report cases of eating disorders until the appearance of television in 1995. In 1998, programs in the United States and Britain began broadcasting there three years later, a diet report (149-50) Bordo's point of view is that Western diet worship spreads even to the remote areas of the world, after all, Bordo says that diet culture will find you no matter where you live Bordo 's view is correct to me, now I think it, many women I know are concerned about their weight, no matter where they come from. .

Why are people of this era, 1600 - 1770 called the era of enlightenment? In this age of enlightenment, humans in the ear think that they are "enlightened" groups. I believe that they are solving human problems. They believe that it is close to other times to understand how the universe and people work, and how to live a better life and live a better life. Why is it sometimes called the era of reason? Between 1600 and 1700, the era of reason is the name of this era. Great thinkers of the time and people who received education think that the universe and the world are logical, rational and reasonable. The age of enlightenment was an age of scientific awakening; the era of enlightenment mainly developed in France. The starting point for Enlightenment is John Locke's book on human understanding. Enlightenment attacked church leaders and focused on problems that were avoided in the past. Trying to challenge the church requires courage. Illuminati asked people "Earth is the center of the universe." There are four major areas of change, religion, intellectuals, economics, politics. From the Middle Ages to the Enlightenment and the Enlightenment of the 19th century and the 19th century, the evolution of knowledge has changed dramatically. From the 17th century to the 18th century to the 19th century, the era of enlightenment was regarded as a cultural movement of intellectuals. It is said that it began to spread to American colonies of Continental Europe. This is by purpose https://www.studymode.com/subjects/which-labels-for-the-middle-ages-best-describe-the-era-between-500-and-1400-in-europe-the-dark-ages- Feudal age of Europe's most faithful, or most golden age ages - page 1. Html Labels and research papers label "What is the best medieval beliefs describing the era of the feudalism of the golden era of the European 500 to 1400 or the European dark era era" Well, men and women, preparation for enlightenment. In this lesson we will introduce Enlightenment. what is that? Enlightenment is sometimes called "era of enlightenment", emphasizing rationality, individualism and skepticism, the 17th century intellectual movement and the late 18th century. Enlightenment challenged the traditional religious view. The Enlightenment was such a broad movement, so there was no exact start date. I did not pop up, but it gradually developed. Most historians set the beginning of the Enlightenment from the middle of the 17th century to the beginning of the 18th century. The work of intellectuals such as Rene Descartes, Barus Spinoza, Isaac Newton is particularly important for the creation of the Enlightenment. Jean-Baptiste Poquelin Moliere wrote Tartuffe at the beginning of Enlightenment's era. A major characteristic of the awareness era was promotion of rationality over emotions for decision making. The Enlightenment leaders truly believe that the world will be better if people do this. In Tartov, when a character makes decisions using his emotions, they feel that they are in a bad state. And those feelings dominate them

amitiénfnomféminin: s'utilise AVEC article "La", "L" "(devant UNE voyelle time muet to OU)," UNE "For example: Fey - NF> DIRA" La Fière "OU" Featuring UNE "Avec Of unnomféminin on., L'adjectif s'accorde.Engénéral, ajoute on the "e" à l'adjectif of the UN For example, DIRA's "UNE Petite Fey" Enad AMI advadverbe: modifie UN adjectif OU un verbe. Est remains unchanged TOUJOURS! Example: "Emperor Marche lentement" "Elleesttrèsgrande.". amitéintimenfnomféminin: s'utilise AVEC article "La", "L" "(devant UNE voyelle time to muet OU)," UNE "For example: Fey - NF> DIRA" La Feille "OU" UNE 's feature "Avec Of unnomféminin on., L'adjectif s'accorde.Engénéral, ajoute on the "e" à l'adjectif of the UN For example, DIRA's "UNE Petite Fey" longueamitiénfnomféminin: s'utilise AVEC article "La", "L" "(devant UNE voyelle time muet to OU)," UNE "For example: Fey - NF> DIRA" La Fière "OU" Featuring UNE "Avec Of unnomféminin on., L'adjectif s'accorde.Engénéral, ajoute on the "e" à l'adjectif of the UN For example, DIRA's "UNE Petite Fey" In 1635, Richelieu fonde L 'academie · Francaise EN, Les Quarante's membressontchargés d'introduire l'ordre DANS La Langue DANSlalittératureparle MOYEN D'UN dictionary, D'UNE grammaire etc. Do not doll unepoétique (traitédeversificationetdepoésie). 1647 En, Les Remarques sur lalangue françaisede Vaugelascodifient Le Bonn Related Links Language. Deleurcôté, Chapelain, Guez de Balzac et al. VOITURE (DANS SES LETTRES) prônentlaclartéfondéesurla existence reason. À cetteépoque, lesAcadémicienspeundédéjàseré fére à de œuvres. Honoréd 'Urfé (1568-1625) Composition Roma L'Astrée (1607-1619) can not be laproseéléganteethadesèteestdéjàclassique. Mainard (1582-1646) et al. Racan (1589-1670) ONTentendulesleçonsdeMalherbe. Descartes écritleDiscoursdelaméthode (1637) etleTraitédespassion (1649). Guez de Balzac, TOUJOURS, AVEC SES LETTRES and others SES essais critique and others politiques (Prince, 1631; leSocratechrétien, 1652) are classical de la and prose composition ajouéunôlecapandans Academy of Arts and Arts, Renaissance Academy of Literature, Innovation Institute, University of the Arts, Innovation Institute. Larang, instrument · de · concentrate politique devient donc 宇根 AFFAIRE D 'ク ー デ タ ー: 1635 エ ン, Richelieufondel' Académiefrançaise, quiestchargéedecréerundictionnaire, uesone grammaire é de de prendre SOIN de lalangue française. DANS La France Du XIXe, lalangue françaisegagnedu topography, encorepatoisà 80% of de la paréle DANS LA PLUS parts MAIS on the de confonstances fight quotidienne. partir de 1880, Jules · Ferries instaurera L'écolelaïque, gratuite et al obligatoire, DANS laquelle L'enseignement SE fait is naturellementenfrançais. Use of L 'of C'EST ainsi que despatoiscommençaàseraréfier Lalangue française acetteartititéquesondéveloppementaétéenpartieL'œuvredegroupesintellectuels, commelaPléiade, OU D 'institution, commel' Académiefrançaise. C'EST UNE Lang DITE «académique». Availability of Toutefois, L 'SES droits et al. Nombreux sont ceuxquimalaxèrentcettelangue Vivante, au Premier rangdesquels Molière: Upper Palais D'ailleurs de la «languede Molière». Devantladeliférationd'empruntslexicauxàl'nglais, legouvernementfrançaistentedeprendre de mesurespourprotégerl'intégritédela Lang. Ainsi, Le 7 Jumber 1972, Illinois promulgueledécrerano 72-9 relatifà l'everhissementdelalangue française, prévoyantlacréationdecommissionions for maneuellesdeterminologie pours L'enrichissementduvocabulairefrançais. La LOI Toubon de 1994 procèdedelacémepréoccupation. Misuan placedisordifocondonnédléredhissementde lalanguefrançaise 1996 de Sondédéd'd'dede

"The exact, complicated and subtle treatment of Spinoza's ideas, and the central problem of knowledge philosophy ... Della Loca advocates an explanation that may be the subject of Spinoza's discussion in the coming years.In general, Della Rocca showed that he is a primitive, subtle and often brilliant interpreter of Spinoza - - Nicholas Jolley of the University of California, San Diego "For Spinoza scholars, historians of general philosophy, advanced philosophical history, and those who are interested in early cognitive psychology, this will be a classical reading." This is one of the most exciting works in history The philosophy that I have been reading for a long time ... should be read most widely. "- Don Garrett of the University of Utah Spinoza's mind theory is totally representative mind theory. For Spinoza psychology is only representative content. In Ethics 2p7, he argues that "the order and connection of thinking is consistent with the order and connection of things", that is, parallel ideas exist for each extended objective. This is called parallel processing. From this point of view, Spinoza can develop his theory of mind: "The first thing that makes up the actual existence of human thought is only the concept of a single existing thing" (2 p 11) . Each heart is an idea that has its own object in itself - in the case of a human being, the mind is the thought of the body and everything that happens in the body is expressed in the mind (he discussed in 2 p 12 and 2 p 13 like) . The mind is a special idea representing a single object, the body in which it is parallel. (Please refer to Della Rocca 1996 for details on Spinoza's representative mind theory.) For Spinoza, the human body has extended attributes, human thought has attributes of thought and expression. Also, the mind and body may express the possibilities of reality in parallel, or the mind and body may be the same substance (substance) considered under different attributes. In the language Spinoza inherited from Descartes, the idea is an expression of ideas. This led to Spinoza's famous conclusion that the human heart is equivalent to the human mind. The parallelism of Spinoza also means that every change in the human body must accompany a change in human thought. "Everything that happens to the subject of thinking that constitutes human thought must be perceived by human thought, that is, if the object constitutes the human mind, the concept is the body, Nothing happens to the body that is not perceived in its mind (Part 2, Proposition 12).

This sentence is synonymous with Macbeth. This is also one of the most important themes of this tragedy, the introduction of appearance and reality. Shakespeare uses various roles and situations to emphasize reality and surreal, reality and falsehood, and disruption of behavior and integrity. To discuss this topic, there are various roles of the wizard in the first paragraph, Duncan in the second paragraph, and Mrs. Macbeth in the third paragraph. Macbeth 's appearance and reality, Mrs Macbeth Macbeth is one of Shakespeare's most mysterious plays, humanity research. In Macbeth, the theme of appearance and reality is clear. It is full of countless, famous and important scenes, including when King Duncan visited Macbeth 's house, Lady Macbeth' s sleepwalking scene, Macbeth 's dagger monologue. They provided their own psychological insight about the character of Lady Macbeth and Lady Macbeth and showed different and very unique movies with many different themes. The protagonists of the movie, Leicester (Kevin Paisley) and Carolyn Burnham (Annette Benin) have proved that there is a big difference between appearance and reality. With the help of the colonel Frank Fitts (Wes Bentley), we learned that people can judge not only their appearance but also the inner one. People do not necessarily look like them. Lester Burnham as a movie talker In real life, we should not judge based only on our own appearance. There are many people who seem to be reliable, but they are not. Appearance and reality are important themes of William Shakespeare's Macbeth. The subject focuses on the tragic result of such mistakes in personality and judgment fooled by seemingly authentic people. In these roles, the appearance and reality of Duncan, who excurses Macbeth, the witch and her own tricks Mrs. Macbeth, Macbeth of Hamlet Hamlet, are composed mainly of various competing forces. One of these forces is the difference between appearance and reality, in other words the difference between appearance and reality. What is it, just how does it look like? I can see that Hamlet has made two main perspectives on this issue. First of all, there is a big difference between inner emotions and external emotions, and between them. In other words, The appearance of "Hamlet" is one of the central themes of Shakespeare's "Hamlet". The role of role in the play is the role of the hidden character - in fact the murderer and looter Claudius plays a role of sad brother and legitimate king, in her son's view Gertrude's Adultery plays a role she is the "most harmful woman" who plays the role of "the most beautiful queen". Even Hamlet himself played a crazy role in his attempt. Philosophical problems in Bertrand Russell's "appearance and reality" The approach to his subject in Bertrand Russell's "philosophical problems" involves Descartes' fundamental skepticism, in which the author cancels all previous assumptions It was. Certain reality and existence. In the first chapter, Russell 's quest for reality in reality compared to reality starts with observation of his surroundings. For example, I checked the form and he confirmed it

In answer to the question of Daniel Dennet's idea and premise attribution attribution, Daniel Dennet developed a true believer in his thesis that outlined his intentional theory. My purpose of this article is to explain his idea and to keep his premise that most of what people think is true. First, briefly explain the intentions and point out why Dennett thinks his system is very useful. Then I will explain the necessary meditation determined by most beliefs and explain the validity of the position in more detail. Daniel Dennet, one of life philosophers, wants to turn everyone into a philosopher. His book, Intuition Pumps and other thinking tools explore the maze of mind games. A philosopher explains that "intuitive pump" is a story and is a scene that invites you to "turn the rotation" - to change details and to reveal new conclusions to present new details I will. For Gary Snyder, poetry is like seeing through socks. In an interview with Bill Moyers, the poet said you were roaming "the landscape of the soul". For authors, finding and solving problems is almost the same as finding socks - you draw out the drawer and see what is there. In answer to the question of Daniel Dennet's idea and premise attribution attribution, Daniel Dennet developed a true believer in his thesis that outlined his intentional theory. My purpose of this article is to explain his idea and to keep his premise that most of what people think is true. First, briefly explain the intentions and point out why Dennett thinks his system is very useful. Then I will explain the necessary meditation determined by most beliefs and explain the validity of the position in more detail. The term "Descartes materialism" meant the concept of mind in the brain (see Block 1995). Before Daniel Dennett (1991) emerged again in the book "Explanation of Consciousness", this term was no longer used in philosophy anymore. Dennett used a very specific definition of the term in his argument and used a specific definition of the word "heart". For Dennett 's criticism, see the Daniel Dennett section. Philosophers who insist on the point of view of the mind in the brain tend to call themselves "indirect realists" or "representatives", where the foundation of conscious experience is in the brain, I disagree that the criticism of that is true of their proposal. Criticism of Dennet makes a materialist 's assumption that when expressions are in the brain, materials that require further flow from the expression can make the expression part of the mind.

In the dedication of Duke of Somerset, Henry Purcell 's opera "Dacritism" he declared: "Because poetry is a harmony of words, music is a note and poetry is prose and speech. Although they may be separated, they are confident that they are the best as they do not have anything when they join Searle is confident that Baroque opera, church music, contactors, instruments It is a rich British composer, including including. Aeneas is the protagonist of Henry Purcell's opera Dido and Aeneas (around 1688) and one of the protagonists of Hector Berlioz's opera Les Troyens (circa 1857). Canadian composer James Rolfe produced his opera "Aeneas and Dido" (Theater by Andrei Alexis in 2007) as a Perce opera. Supporting role. Despite the many elements of the drama, the story of Aeneas evoked great interest in the film industry. Drawn by Steve Reeves, he is the protagonist of the 1961 sword and sandal movie Guerra di Troia. Reeves repeatedly described this role in the movie "Avengers" on collisions between Aene and local tribes coming to Lazio, where he tried to solve his fellow Trojan refugees. Dido and Aeneas are set in the same name of Henry Purcell 's 1689 opera and are based on the story to Roman creation by Virgil' s famous Aeneas and Descartes Queen Dior. As a dance director of the Royal Palace Theater in Brussels, Belgium, Mark Morris announced the opera at a dance exclusive stage with a singer placed in the pit. The unique combination of baroque vocals and modern dance sets out the storytelling of Morris and the ability to turn music and words into action. In 1689, Henry Purcell 's Dido and Aeneas made their debut at London Girls' School of Josias Priest. "When my boyfriend lied on the ground, my mistakes never occurred, your breasts were no problem." Dido's Lament faced scorpions and later became the most famous arias of opera . Sad Did walked crannyly to the stage and broke heart after Aeneas returned to Italy. "Remember me, Oh, forget my destiny" is the last sentence before putting a knife in my chest. Hundreds of years ago, Lenette literally hit Aeneas' sofa, licking these notes quickly moved back to life. The relationship between the short story and the story around Aria is remarkable. An important component of Aria is the use of passus duriusculus or chromatic four, a musical technique in which each semitone is played from 1 to 4 or 4 to 1 in ascending or descending order.

- BC In 1990, Abraham exiled in 1990 BC - an exiled monarchy in 1450 BC, 1450 BC. - 1045 BC, unified monarchy 1045 BC. - BC 930, Israel 930 - 725 BC 725 BC 590 B. Jews 590 BC - 440 BC - Babylon - 440 BC - Exile as of 440 BC. - 6-4 BC It is because it is the time since the birth of Jesus Christ (Congelliere). According to the theory of evolution, the schedule is formed as a single cell of 8 billion years (prokaryote), 1 billion multicellular organism, 500 million fish and wild amphibian, 360 million amphibious, 200 million years etc. It has been. This year's mammals, non-birds since 65 million years In modern public places, the most prominent interaction between science and religion includes evolution and creation / intellectual design. The lobbying for a legitimate struggle (eg Kitzillaire and Dover's trial in 2005) and evolutionary and creative education centered on American schools suggests a contradiction between religion and science. But even if we focus on the acceptance of evolution the relationship between religion and science is complicated. For example, in the UK, scientists, clergy and popular writers tried to harmonize science and religion from the 19th century to the early 20th century, whereas the United States against the emergence of evolutionary thought like the 1925 scope test I saw fundamentalism (Bowler 2001, 2009). ) Evolution theory and evolution theory explain the fact. Creationism is a myth that explains the facts. Evolutionism is proved by facts, creationism is a story about facts. It is always interesting to learn about science and religion, but it is interesting to understand that science produces facts and that all creationists (religions) can be discussed through evolution theory. Therefore evolutionists provided evidence and creationists tried many other thinkers who used scientific theories empirically inferred to challenge Galileo, Copernicus, Bacon, Descartes, and the Biblical hypothesis I will try to. . The Catholic Church called this ideology of creationism as heresy and thus has a bad habit of suppressing complete disarray of the Bible to some extent. For centuries the scientific research has evolved into the theory of big bang and evolution, although it is mainly such a place. A comprehensive approach to discussion on evolution and creationism requires that I explain the positive explanation provided by creationists. If you want to compare evolution to creationism, you can not focus on the difficulties you may encounter with evolutionary thinking. You also have to study options carefully. Doing so will bring a lot of difficulties to Genesis. The reason is that the creationists silence the details of the explanation they want to protect, or create a detailed story that can not be scientifically reviewed. For example, as I mentioned, the "creationists of the young earth" believe that there is only a thousand years history on Earth. This argument conflicts with various highly scientific findings such as geology and physics, which are highly reliable. If you buy this version of Genesis you must refuse evolution, not the majority of other science.

Enlightenment was an era of the 18th century when philosophy and cultural life changed. The exercise began in France and spread to the UK, Italy, Spain, Portugal and Germany at the same time These ideas began with the most famous thinkers and philosophers of the time and eventually shared with the public. Enlightenment is a way of focusing on human improvement by logic and reason rather than absurdity and superstition. This way of thinking shows skepticism in front of religion, challenging inequality between the king and the people, and trying to establish a sound moral system. The idea behind ... shows more content According to Stockstad, these ideas were born from the scientific revolution of the last century, philosophers such as Francis Bacon and Descartes established a scientific method based on the logical reasoning we now know . Experiment to prove these ideas. Astronomer Galileo Galilei confirmed the previous theory of Nicolaus Copernicus that the sun is another way instead of going around the Earth - the planet revolves around the sun. These theories and practices are contrary to the teaching of the Church, especially when Galileo was forced to regain what he said in his view. Other scientists have found on smaller scales related to the animal kingdom and plant life, and artists are used to conveying new discoveries by drawing or drawing these findings. (P. 756) Due to the various revolutions and events that occurred before the 18th century, it can be said that enlightenment is only a logical advance and the next step. Like the previous scientific revolution, the new enlightenment philosophy was disseminated through both art and text, like the encyclopedia of Dennis Diderot sold to the middle class of France printed. The encyclopedia has the latest view on the advantages of art, science and human freedom. Due to this progress Age of Enlightenment is an age of scientific awakening, and Age of Enlightenment mainly developed in France. The starting point of enlightenment is John Rock's book on human understanding. Enlightenment attacked the leaders of the church and focused on problems that were avoided in the past. Trying to challenge the church takes courage. As the Church said, enlightenment let people ask questions such as "Earth is the center of the universe." - These journals impair these authoritative sources - through knowledge and reasons - suggesting a source of new knowledge. The history of the French Academy of Sciences during enlightenment began with the Academy of Sciences in Paris in 1666. As several clerics (13%) show, the academic community shows an increasing interest in science and its secularization. The era of enlightenment, sometimes called the age of reason, refers to the time that leads the movement of thought called enlightenment. During enlightenment, people insisted on it as a means of establishing authoritative aesthetics, ethics, government and even religion. Some people think that the reasons allow people to get objective truth about reality - <http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Age_of_Enlightenment> (May 5, 2010 Day Access). 60 Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau among them can be said to have made the most important contribution to the development of liberalism by announcing some pioneering work on liberalism. These works are J Rousseau Social Contract, two articles on citizen's government by T Hobbes Leviathan, J Locke. Later philosophers such as Kant and Rawls further developed these ideas. The focus is different from philosophers and philosophers, but the central idea of ​​social contract remains unchanged.

In the privatization of ongoing public higher education, when the traditional college idea is being attacked - emphasizing the depreciation of the STEM field and liberal arts - when turning to online education - we urgently It is necessary to ask which university to select as soon as possible. What about education with purely technical words? School, teacher, society - what happens to the students? Why do not students study so much at college? Why is the course less important than extracurricular activities? Why are not many young people today able to find purpose consciousness? What have we done to our children, why do we want to do this? The answer is simple in the past: the university is where you come to learn about these things. However, as higher education expands its scope, it becomes increasingly difficult to tell what the university is like and what the university is like. In the United States I now teach, more than 17 million undergraduates are planning to participate in this program this autumn. They go through scale, public and private institutions, two and four year systems, online and on campus. Some of them will pursue accounting, nursing or web design careers with profit organizations like DeVry University and Phoenix University. Many people enter the community college, get useful qualifications, or prepare to transfer to a four-year university. Not to mention experts, some people enter liberal arts college without professional planning. For any course, quite a few people will encounter Descartes as part of undergraduate requirements. Why is this happening? Generally, university administrators do not know what university education is: now, I will start from the beginning. That is the beginning. University is the best institution in our country. In fact, they are the crown jewelry of the most effective educational system in the world. If someone knows what learning is, those who manage the university should do so. Teaching the future of our country is not an easy thing, education is not an easy question to answer. Some of the world's best educators are still trying to figure out what kind of things are happening in the educational process. In our current education system, student education seems to be a process that can not be quantified by blows or missing. Art may not be technology In general, people have always believed that accepting university education is a successful way to develop people's lives. But what does university education mean? Is university education really worthwhile? Receiving college education really will benefit people's lives. According to online definitions, it defines university education as higher education, which is "the final stage of formal learning options to be done after secondary education". - "Education does not have how much memory you have, how much you know, it distinguishes what you know and what you do not know" with a French novelist Quoting philosopher Anatole France. Education is an absolute key to success in life, but education is one of the most expensive expenses in the United States. According to the California provisional budget statement, $ 22.5 billion of funds for higher education

The recognition of super heroes and super devils is mainly based on the subjective definition of each concept. These observations often lead to a clear dichotomy, which divides the character into two inseparable parts. However, with this rigorous separation, we can not explain extreme characters that do not suit each purpose. This type of crack can not be classified as a superhero - super devil dichotomy where both sides flirting. Therefore, the criteria established for super heroes and super demons must be analyzed to reach a more complete explanation. The education of Giambattista Vico and "Heroes of Mind" abstracts humanities. Vico's concept of heroic thinking forms the foundation of Chinese teaching of university education. This is also the key to understanding his humanitarian criticism of Descartes epistemology. - From conservative Hong Kong to liberal arts, the crucial moment of my life happened two years ago. I graduated from high school in Hong Kong and came to the USA to complete secondary education for international students in New York. I left my parents, my family, friends, and my language to experience foreign cultures and broaden my view of education and life. You are a parent of a child with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder (HF-ASD), Asperger's syndrome, or general developmental disability-NOS, preparing to transition to the background of higher education such as colleges and universities. Community college within a few years of high school students? Can I participate in the development of a computer-based program designed to support the transition from HF-ASD to university and to achieve greater success? 3C Institute, funded by the US Department of Education, is looking for individuals with high function autistic spectrum disorder (HF-ASD). Parents and educators are providing feedback on current resources for PSE transition. . Feedback on web based programs. If your child is eligible and you and your child are selected to participate in the study, you are asked: Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a complex neurodevelopmental disorder. To better understand the role of the linguist pathologist (SLP) in supporting ASD children in various countries, the Child Language Committee of the International Logo Language Institute (IALP) is a child with ASD or We conducted an SLP survey of young people. Methods and participants: The survey included 58 questions about respondent background information, children's characteristics of ASD, and the role of SLP in the practice of diagnosis, evaluation and intervention. This survey is available in English, French, Russian and Portuguese and is distributed online. International survey of language pathologists dealing with children with autistic spectrum disorder

A woman to clean and cook for men is now a common stereotype / objectivity for women. Men are using a lot of phrases "women belong to the kitchen" now. The authors claim that the reduction of women as men is a general and global message from the movie. B. "Volume depicting sex and Disney Princess" Author: Dawn England, La Lide Descartes, Melissa Collier Meek In this article, all the Disney movies princess encodings and research, as well as male and female characteristics I will explain the prince. Especially at the early stage of the Disney Princess movie, depiction of Disney regarding men and women is influenced by gender norms and roles. When the Disney Princess movie was first released in the 1930's, the main cultural understanding of women was closely related to their role as a housewife. In order to win the audience and customer base, Disney used these ideas when the first Princess films "Snow White" and "Seven Dwarves" were released in 1937, effectively using Disney Princess Movies I drew them in a role. In addition, in the initial film production, almost all Walt Disney employees were men. Films produced by male employees not only reflect the dominant view of gender but also because the men of the time were thought to be more capable and thus superior to women, the inherent bias I'm waiting. This reflects a strong, skilled number of men and a quiet and weak social custom of women. Disney Princess movies are excellent for showing us the typical sexual role and stereotypes between men and women. Sometimes they spoil sexuality, but this often fails to show us the stereotypical idea of ​​the typical sex role. I'd like to focus on nine specific Disney Princess movies, but I also discuss other Disney Princess movies that break the role of gender. The nine Disney Princess movies that I draw attention are "Snow White" and "Seven Pictures", "Cinderella", "Sleeping Beauty", "Little Mermaid", "Beauty and the Beast", "Aladdin", " Hyacinth ". ", Muran", "Princess and Frog". All these nine princess movies are primarily movie stars, mainly female and male characters, and female characters. Disney movies are loved by people of all ages all over the world and are one of the most popular movies in the industry. However, there is a controversy over these cult movies: the sex role of personality. In many Disney movies, female characters are considered to be weaker than strong and superior male characters. This inequality is insufficient to teach young people the existence of social behavior and expectation for specific sex. In the early Disney Princess movie, the princess always "always rescued" her by marrying her prince "always happy". However, this limits the role of women in specific sex roles. Why do women need "eternal happiness", including men?

In the following I will prove that the ontological argument itself is not enough to prove the existence of God. The discussion I discuss in detail has some questions to explain why "ontological debate" is not satisfactory. Canterbury's "big" St. Anselm's definition defines God as "can not be thought of as more than one" (Bailey, 2002). The problem with this definition is that the word "big" certainly applies to interpretation. The first and most famous ontological debate was proposed by St. Anselm of Canterbury on the 11th. Century C. E. St. Anselm argues that in Proslogion, it leads to the existence of God from the notion of existence, not without a bigger concept. St. Anthom believes that if such existence does not exist, it can be imagined that a larger being, that is, a presence without a bigger existence - can be imagined. But this is ridiculous: there can not be anything bigger than an unthinkable one. So there is a bigger existence, not a god but a presence. The ontological argument is widely believed to be first clarified by St. Anselm of Canterbury. And he defined God as the most imaginable being. Anselm 's reasoning is that if there exists only in the mind and not in reality, there is a bigger existence (exists in the mind and the reality). The famous 17th century French philosopher Ren © Descartes used an ontological argument. Norman Malcolm resumed an ontological debate in 1960. The diversity of ontological arguments has been endorsed and protected by contemporary philosophers such as Alvin Plantinga (whose arguments are based on modal logic) and William Lane Craig. Ontological arguments are transcendental arguments. These arguments try to prove the existence of God from the meaning of the word God. Anselm of Canterbury introduced an ontological argument to his work 'Proslogion'. The classic argument of Anselm is based on two principles, the most important of which are St. Anselm and Rene de Carte of the above Canterbury. If he does not exist you can still think of a larger being (as you said that there is no God other than this existence). Presence must be one of the attributes of God. Because by removing it it is still possible for you to understand the bigger god (the god that exists). The most common problem with this discussion is that it only seems to enumerate the existence of God's attributes and does not seem to indicate it. This argument seems to indicate that any fact you can imagine should be true.

Human understanding In the history of human understanding, I can not think of a person who can learn from a single point of view of philosophy. To compare and contrast their ideas, I am very pleased that there are two philosophers in this class. The subject of human understanding is the various ideas to be discussed, but these ideas can be very complicated. Two philosophers, René Descartes and David Hume, took up the task of discussing human understanding and making them conditions that allow people to better understand. The responsibility of human understanding is to understand what something can not understand and what they are. In addition to understanding, if you need to care about understanding at the same time, you only need to make public opinion. On the other hand, understanding, contemplation is also a gift from God. What should people do and what they do not use it? A person uses it in fear and trembling rather than for his own interests but if it uses it in fear and tremor to fulfill the truth it is still in the eternal meaning of God Believe in him if you believe it is a matter of decision, and obey it unconditionally. This is not a fear of God, but to serve God in a different way, but more enthusiastically, in a reflexive manner than spontaneous people. "For me as a historian, religion is an indispensable feature for human experience, human society, and human lifestyle.In my opinion, understanding religion is essential for understanding human beings Religion is almost everything - history has played a major role - American Revolutionary War, Civil War, Black Slavery, Abolitionism, all of these things. "I am an atheist who is a religious person. I live in their world, but I am not part of that. I live in the world Puritan believed that God reserved this fallen beautiful world. I live in a world where Joseph Smith can find gold plates and angels to visit you. I live in a world where a man rises from the death and miracles appear. This is a world of fun filled life, but if you do not believe it, it is also the world of aliens. Many scholars today believe that human nature has spontaneous goodness. They do not know what human nature is. They do not understand - how can you solve your problem if you do not understand? Joseph Conrad knows that we need to change our minds. But he does not know how to change. Conrad said "The fundamental change in the mind is a strange belief that it should follow after the decline of a certain human system.These people think that it is only a name change that they can produce I can not understand. "In other words, the surface appearance can be changed, but the core value will not be changed. We do not change it because we do not understand it - so human suffering continues

Book Review of European Politics in the 17th Century Two magazines that I chose to comment on are history and theory, a study of historical philosophy, published at the Wesleyan University and the Renaissance Forum. I will read two historical book reviews on two different places and topics. The first book is about the Marxist historian's book about the reasons and incentives of the French Revolution before and after the revolution and the class problem of the French Revolution written by Jack Amari Rio and Bruce Norton. In the 17th century, Europe experienced a series of thought, knowledge and belief changes that influenced society, influenced politics and brought about cultural change. This is a revolution of thought, understanding how nature works, and desire to understand the laws of nature. Advancement of knowledge has brought out powerful waves emerging from astronomy and mathematics, expanding customs, culture and social behavior of the times. In the history of Europe this period was called scientific revolution. Historians are discussing when the revolution will begin, when will it end, who is the protagonist, and how it will develop, so this expression is controversial. Some historians agree with Nicolaus Copernicus numbers and sun-centered theory (1473-1543) to show the beginning of the scientific revolution, but I believe it comes from Francis Bacon (1561) . Scientific method of -1626) and his explanation. Europe changed greatly from the 17th century to the 18th century. In many ways, this change is the result of changes in intellectuals in natural history and scientific methods. The scientific revolution caused by philosophers such as Bacon, Newton, Descartes, and others caused a dramatic change in European arts and literature. - By the end of the 17th century, a new revolution is about to begin when Protestant Reform movement is over in most parts of Europe. It is now known as the "scientific revolution" - it is mainly due to the combination of two main factors. First, the famous revolution before the reform showed that it is not special that it doubts public opinion, and sometimes it even welcomes it. Since the 17th century, enlightenment attempted to remove European censorship system. And it found a political dictatorship combined with religious traditionism. In the 1930's, Alexis de Tocbil was surprised that ordinary people seeking political freedom in the United States continue to be religiously religious and continue to be religious. This is not a typical combination of Europe in his time. Even so, we should recognize that the core principles of the strict medieval theological political system that contemporary people oppose is the application of intention (or sovereignty) to the trials of wisdom. Thomas Aquinas insisted on adhering to this principle in "German", that is, contemporary devotion to freedom of speech ultimately depends on this principle. Justice is completely dependent on will. That is God. "

In this article, we will explore all aspects of the literary movement first appeared in the 19th century, the existentialism. It will discuss different climates that existed during the literary movement, including society, politics and economics. Combining the basic dictionary definition and the numerous interpretations that the author derived from existentialism, the information provided will deepen the understanding of the origin, popularity and breadth of the subject matter. In this article I will explore the work of famous existent writers, including Jean-Paul Sartre, Franz Kafka, Luigi Pirandello, Albert Camus, covering the whole period of existentialism. In this article, we briefly outline the history of existentialist thinkers, then discuss how empathicistic challenges place emphasis on freedom of choice in the world, and finally in response to my reaction We must take responsibility. It exists. How these dilemmas lead to loss of anxiety, guilt, inertia, motivation, responsibility for "interests" and existing choice are ontological anxiety, natural reaction to real life, Choosing to live in nature or return to a lonely world as you avoid resolving conflicts with the dilemma. Existential pathology will contrast with this Existential notes 4 Historical existentialism belongs to the 19th century to the 20th century as a unique philosophical and literary movement, but elements of existentialism are found in Socrates's thought (and life), the Bible, and research You can do. Many philosophers and writers before the modern era. Pascal's first major problem in predicting modern existentialism was Bryce Pascal, a French philosopher of the 17th century. Pascal refused the strict rationality of his contemporary traitor, Descartes, and was interrupted at his "Pensees" (1670), aborting the system philosophy that assumed the interpretation of God and humanity was pride. Like the later existent writer, he sees human life in the form of public opinion: the combination of man and self is itself a paradox and contradiction. In history, many thinkers have embodied the existentialist tradition. In that there is Augustine, believing that "the truth is in the hearts of people." In opposition to the reasonable nature of Thomas Aquinas Duns Scotus insisted that in his famous statement "There is a reason not to know the inside", the human will must be the basis of every statement . Kierkegaard, Nietzsche, and those who chased it opposed the delusive reality that we could foresee the difference between the truth and the reality in Western culture and understand it in an abstract and transcendental way. They protest strongly to dry intellectuals, but they are neither simple activists nor anti-rational. Other campaigns that subvert antinomicism and thought to emotions should not be confused with existentialism.

Throughout history, women are unfortunately called the "opposite side" of men. Many philosophers believe that women are the second nature. The idea that a woman as a second gender is led by a woman with a false concept, and manhood is a right way of life. This idea was recently given a new name: androcentrism. Male-centeredness is a new type of gender discrimination, which is not only preference for men but also preference for women, but in general it is a masculine temperament that prefers feminism. This new term is a complete summary of what many philosophers chanted in this process. Feminists are very smart. They have existed for a long time. Feminism in our time arises from radical rationalism which reforms academic dialogue and continues to eliminate central prejudice and violence in all aspects of society. The feminist's point of view helps to build a healthier relationship than ever. I am reading some popular blogs about romantic relationships. Most of them remind me of my past attitude. And I know that I am not alone. Overall, blogs written by these women ignore gender political / socialization performance in interpersonal relationships. For example, because of the inability to distinguish different experiences of biological men and women, depictions of their health relationships will strengthen the opportunities of women and the relative way they build intimate relationships. When feminists turned their attention to the development of a new epistemological reconstruction project, one of their main tasks was the emergence of the feminist movement, previously thought to be objective knowledge production, and sexism and man It was to explain the relationship with understanding of the likeness. Excellent case. . Has criticism about the role of gender-based hypotheses in classical personality such as Aristotle or Descartes appear only by the rise of feminist movement? Whereas primates started to develop alternative models including asking questions about research based on male superiority pattern and investigating the behavior of female primates in detail, why the number of women in the field has increased Is it? Why do feminist psychologists need to point out that masculinity based on male studies leads to human conclusions? In the early 1970s, female sociologists began to question sociological research, analysis, and the sociological paradigm and women's concealment in the curriculum. In 1969, feminist sociologists challenged male-centricity in this field at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association. This led to the establishment of a social female sociologist organization and eventually established the new sociological journal "Gender and Society". Today, gender sociology is considered one of the most prominent areas in this field.

What is the idea of ​​Plato and Locke's innate concept? What is the natural idea? This can be defined as an idea or spiritual expression that is created by external perception or reproduced by our imagination. It exists in the mind thanks to the essence of human thought. According to Plato, even though not all of our knowledge is natural. However, John Locke felt that we had no congenital idea. Then the question is who is right, or they are wrong. In this article, I will try to study contradictory views of Plato and Rock. John Locke uses three arguments against natural ideas in the book "Papers on Human Understanding." The purpose of this paper is to discuss and explain his three arguments on natural ideas while discussing the views on John Rock's thought and detailing his view on the whiteboard. In addition, we will briefly explain other aspects of congenital thinking, along with competition and similarities. - Hobbes, Rock John Rock and Thomas Hobbes were a famous political theorist of the day. Hobbes who was born 40 years before the birth of rock has a totally different view from rock and both will do more research through this article. Many theories differ in the 16th century, but the rise of the country and the decline of the feudal system caused authority problems, so Hobbes and Rock's theory got closer. In this article we discuss a detailed analysis of the congenital idea between Descartes and Rock and the meaning of congenital thinking. Each philosopher takes a totally different position on this subject and each viewpoint will be thoroughly examined. The main question here is where is our idea coming from? The basis for controversy and argument is that some philosophers and others believe that humans have natural knowledge and ideas. Others have denied this. When people ask, what looks like black and white changes to gray. Therefore, when analyzing the debate about talent, if we say that someone knows something or is born with an idea, we have to see what we mean (Stich 1) Discussion about contemporary talent actually started with discussions in the first chapter of his thesis on Human Understanding about Rock's Naturalism and Natural Thought. The key to discussion is to use talent as a candidate for our knowledge and understanding, and therefore leave this field to the empirical description formed in the rest of the paper. The main objectives of Rock's argument are twofold: firstly, the fact that Nazi agree with their view is not truth at all, secondly, even if facts are accepted for discussion It is that both parties accept the role of knowledge acquisition experience. I believe that experientialists have only experience; nativists believe that experience adds innovative principles and ideas

Postmodern is a very difficult concept to define. A French philosopher defined Postmodernism as "a suspect of all metanarathies", but this basically means skepticism about all claims of absolute truth. The elements and techniques used by postmodern authors raise doubts about their reading experiences and motivate readers to examine their own understanding of life and social value. Postmodern writers use good examples of postmodern compositions such as satire, magical realism, fragmentation of short stories read by women. It refers to famous fuzzy terms, especially literature, postmoderns can be seen as a response to very modern elitism and the fear of the world war. Contemporary literature is characterized by highly separated fragmented culture. The low technology reflects the lack of tradition and structure in the world driven by technology and consumerism. Postwar literature (post modern): Actually, this is the most difficult time to define this time. Especially there is no clear border between modernism and postmodern. But the postwar era of all types such as Samuel Beckett and the absurd drama related to Harold Pinter and the new model in poetry and novel has experimental techniques. Some of British literature's best writers are Philipp Larkin, Ted Hughes, Salman Rushdie, John Fowles, Kazuo Kazuo, Tom Stoppard. The first species of modernism literature was embedded in the emergence of the modern era. Modernity is a historical period of post-traditional or post medieval, characterized by completely transformed from tradition. This is a time to commemorate the emergence of a reasonable age from enlightenment (about 1687 to 1789). Scientists such as Emmanuel Kant, Rene Descartes, and most importantly Isaac Newton, can save the world through science and through their reasons that they can lay the foundation of universal truth believe. Political leaders like Niccolò Machiavelli also revealed modernity. It believes that they can establish peace through rationality and creates large movements such as capitalism, industrialism and urbanization. Talking about postmodern means that modernism is over. It's not. There was no neat borderline. The avant - garde movement in the original literature and art was modernistic, influence of avant - garde continued. You can say that there are new avant - garde. In addition, postmodern is still happening. When something else evolves or replaces it, it may be easier to identify, explain and classify it. Regarding lighting, it is possible to evaluate specific functions of postmodern. For example, there is ignition that is contrary to authority and meaning, and often it is not a type. Here you can quote experimental techniques In the novels shown in the new Rome and anti - novel (q.q.u), these seem dangerously close to just a hoe.

The adaptation of Shirow's Ghost in the Shell igly Mike Oshii is based on the attention to details and the straight cohesiveness to those details, so that they can work together to create complicated ideas and plots Formation. Almost all details and all plot elements have something to do with the important theme of animation. Several topics relate to the commercialization of the body and the body, the separation between one's mind and body, and the recognition that static environment and organisms are weak fortresses. The phrase of Lyle influences Shirow Masamune's "Ghost in the Shell" title, SF comics and animation, imagining the future Japan, "human" ghost "is a shell of a biological robot You can transplant. Ghost in the Shell questioned what would happen to the human category when the physical difference between people and machines ceased. It was admired in the world of international literature and art as an intense existential meditation on superhumanism and as inspiration for similar premises and other films with a philosophical tendency, the most famous being the Wachowski brothers' Matrix ". part Ghost in the shell is a manga and animated franchise written in 1980 by Mangaka Masamune Shoro, a legendary manga culture. Although the ghost repeats itself many times, the main content of the story is a not far future, and cybernetic technology evolved until human beings are frequently used. The hero Kusanagi element is actually a semi-mechanical person with only one organic brain. The main Kusanagi and her lagtag team are hired by the government to fight cyber terrorism. There are many battles about human wisdom, science fiction novels, and the truly great monologue nature. The Ghost in the Shell (GITS) is a Japanese media franchise by Masamune Shiro. As Arthur Kestler states in the book "The Ghost in the Machine", the authors are inspired by Descartes' debate about dualism. GITS follows the on-site action led by imaginary anti-cyber terrorist organization, Public Safety Division 9, the main character Mr. Motoko Kusanagi in the middle of the 21st century. GITS is a unique choice for political students because of the amazing stories about the short-term impact of technology. While obscuring the boundary between technology and life, the GITS series also explores complex themes of identity, refugees, pacifism, militarism and nuclear deterrence. Ghost in the shell is probably the most popular work by Shirow. After Appleseed was released, 'Ghost' shares had similarities in terms of theme and concept - Appleseed asked about human nature, human interaction and interaction with technology. What is humanity? However, unlike Appleseed, these problems are woven into the story and are key to Ghost, Major Kusenage, the hero, is itself a human brain in a very complex artificial body .

What is memory and how does it work? Memory and conceptualization seems to play a role in perceptual and behavioral services. Conceptualization is the encoding of a pattern that allows physical interaction with the 3D world. These patterns are limited by environmental structure, body structure and memory. Therefore, how we imagine looking at the environment depends on the type of body we have. There is no connection to such memories. Instead, how the concepts become related (and what it means to be related to) is how the individual behavior patterns combine, taking into account the constraints of our bodies It depends on. What we call humans includes an extended body and a series of physical thinking (human mind). The body is constrained by the causal law of the physical world. As determined by the idea so far, the two causal chains are parallel to each other. In fact, Spinoza generally insists that the order and connection of things is the same as the order and connection of ideas. Evidence is worth prudent research, since the parallel processing argument is dominant in the second part. The mode of thinking is the idea of ​​"formal reality" which is their existence. However, the idea has content or "objective reality". Because the reality of formal thinking is embedded in the chain of necessary causes, its objective reality is also determined by linkage. Because Spinoza already mentioned in axiom 4 that "knowledge of effect depends on knowledge of cause and contains it" in the first part. For Spinoza, the human body has extended attributes, human thought has attributes of thought and expression. In addition, it can be said that the mind and body expresses the possibilities of reality in parallel, or the same substance (substance) that the mind and body were considered under different attributes. In the language Spinoza inherited from Descartes, the idea is an expression of ideas. This meant that Spinoza reached his famous conclusion that the human mind is equivalent to the human mind. The parallelism of Spinoza also means that every change in the human body must accompany a change in human thought. "Things that make up the concept of human thought must be perceived by human thought.If the object constitutes the human mind, the concept is a physical body, and what is not perceived by the mind is the body Nothing happens "(Part 2, Proposition 12) Remember that there is only one substance. Body and mind are the same individual and are considered under different attributes. This has several effects. The first is that "the subject of thought that constitutes human thought is the body, in other words, it is on extension line of existence, not something else." In other words, perception is the human body. As mentioned above, all our thoughts are regulated by our body condition. When we perceive something, such as red spots and ice cream taste, it is our body's change that we feel. (II, 22) In Part 1, the concept of effect includes the concept of reason, so the concept of ice cream taste (effect) includes the idea of ​​ice cream and our body I will. However, this type of mediation through the body introduces ideological constraints (this constraint will not be destroyed before the fifth part)

The greatest philosopher of ancient Greece Plato was born in Athens in 428 BC or 427 BC. It is a nobleman family. He studied in Socrates and he played a role in many conversations. He took part in the Socrates trial and the traumatic experience may lead him to try to design an ideal society. After the death of Socrates, he tried to learn widely. After 12 years he returned to Athens and founded his college, one of the earliest organized schools in Western civilization. Plato's student is Aristotle. Several other effects of Plato are Pythagoras, Anakusagorasu and Palmenide Plato was written extensively, and most of his work escaped. His work appeared in the form of dialogue, and several characters are discussing topics while interrogating each other. With this form Plato can think of various ideas and let the reader decide which ideas are valid. Plato details the format of dualism that there is a world of ideal shape that is different from the world of perception. People living in the cave can only see the glittering shadows that are reflected on the actual wall outside. This influences many later philosophers, especially neoprene tonics and gnostics, and resembles some of Hindu's double metaphysical views. Plato died in 347 BC. In the Middle Ages he broke into Aristotle. His work was preserved by descendants of Islamic scholars and reintroduced to the west during the Renaissance. Since then, he has had a strong influence on philosophy and natural science and social science. The exact order of dialogue is unknown, but the following is an agreement order based on internal evidence. In these conversations, Socrates is a central figure and is considered to express his own view. This is the only remaining record of Socratic doctrine; therefore they are called Socrates' dialogue. In these conversations, Plato began to express his views with Socrates' scorpion. Seminar and Republic are the most important works of this period Later dialogue was a deep development of philosophy expressed in early dialogue; these are the most difficult works of Plato. It is noteworthy that Plato wrote "dialogue", Aristotle wrote the paper. When a person reads Plato's conversation like Aristotle's thesis, people will not understand the conversation. Reading Plato just as we read Aristotle is one of the fates that we encountered in the English speaking community. Previous generations of British and American thinkers have read Plato as if they are reading Aristotle's thesis. Augustine, Aristotle, the traditional language landscape seen by logical positivists, in our understanding of "metaphysics" of "subjectivity" (Descartes, Kant) as "rationality as a way of understanding" Discussed. Deep connection In this traditional figure, the symbol represents an object (theme), but it is also a symbol of a concept or image in the speaker's mind (frame). A conceptual or psychological image is the manifestation of the speaker's heart and brain. Our understanding of Socrates comes from many conversations Plato wrote in 399 years. In almost every conversation, we all know more than 30 people. Socrates is the main lecturer. Plato's dialogue style is important - this is the Socratic style he used throughout the process. In the dialogue of Socrates, questions and answers, questions and answers, question and answer formats are used. This is a dialectic. Socrates will discuss two aspects of the problem in order to draw conclusions. Then, this conclusion is contrary to another hypothesis. It may be difficult to understand why Socrates is regarded as a bull fly!

Advances in artificial intelligence have brought benefits to our lives A young girl sat in a chair and entered the psychologist Eliza's office. The girl began to say "Men are the same." "How?" Eliza replied, "They always try to do things in some way," the girl shouted. Specific examples? "Well, my boyfriend asked me to come here." "Your boyfriend came here" "He said I was very depressed." "I am really unhappy. "Do you think you will be unhappy by coming here?" "Maybe you can get along with my mother. Tell me more about your family? Elizabeth My research on artificial intelligence (AI) is developing mainly on the idea that advanced cognitive machines use intuition as the basis of intelligence (see "Artificial intuition"). Our own human idea provides sufficient evidence for general intelligence. Humans are basically intuitive machines, our rational (and conscious) self are just intuitive machine-based simulations (see "Cognitive stack"). This is in stark contrast to Descartes' famous "Cogito ergo sum". In other words, our rational thought is to separate us from biology. Therefore, in order to require the techniques and methods driven by logical mechanisms, cognitive bias is necessary. This is the reason why Good Old Fashion AI (GOFAI) has failed for decades, which is why it tries to solve intellectual problems from formal logic as a starting point. We live in a world that drives artificial intelligence. Almost every area of ​​today benefits from the progress of Facebook's artificial intelligence. This shows that our friends can trade our stocks through computers even with their parking cars. One of the places where artificial intelligence is expected to change dramatically is education. We may not see humanoid robots teaching in the classroom, but there is an artificial intelligence tool that can help teachers and students maximize their learning experiences. These tools shape and redefine future educational experiences We live in a pleasant age, and progress in artificial intelligence (AI) promotes innovative technologies that change our lives. These advances, particularly deep learning, accelerated the development of computer vision applications for automated driving vehicles. To train these artificial intelligence systems, you need to plan and prepare many video data sets. This can take thousands of hours to annotate correctly. Scaling video annotations is more difficult than scaling image annotations. A video of just 10 minutes contains 18,000 to 36,000 frames at a speed of 30 to 60 frames per second. The frame-by-frame video annotation is time-consuming and costly, and it is a major obstacle for technological innovators to win the competition in the market.

My parents (Juan José Ortiz and Manuela Girón) passed away as a child, so my older sister, Maria Sotero, received the custody. On 14th September the plan was revealed by the mailman. Miguel regarded Dona as a part of the revolt and locked it in the room. She wrote a letter to Father Hidalgo. On 16th September, Father Hidalgo received the letter and rang the bell, and the believers not only fought for the government. Independence from the Spanish rule, Agustin Iturbide became the emperor and invited Dona to become part of his court but she refused politely to appoint the queen She thinks the empire is against the ideals of the independence war. The donor was trapped in the Santa Clara monastery and later experimented in Mexico City. In court, she was found guilty of treason. She was detained in various monasteries due to severe punishment. Her parents Juan José Ortiz and Manuela Girón de Ortiz died soon after her birth. Joseph was brought up by her sister. After receiving education at the famous Colegio de las Vizcainas, I graduated in 1791 and married Miguel Dominguez. They went to Queretaro where the husband was assigned to the duties. Queretaro is the main venue for independence movement and Joseph plays his historical role in the right place. Joseph has a pure Spanish lineage, but like many Creole elites she despises the Spaniards born in Spain and they show a very arrogant attitude towards Creole. Her anti - Spanish attitude also comes from her participation in the literary circle. On that day, privileged Creole organization was custom. They smuggled the works of Voltaire, Rousseau and Descartes, they were banned by the church and made intense debate. These literary societies soon became political society. The most important is Queretaro. It all began with the conspiracy of Queretaro, once condemned, and impaired the revolutionary plan of the Mexican revolution. Under the skill of Miguel Dominguez and his wife Dona Joseph Ortiz (to become an independent heroin), the leader pretends to be a literacy academy. The plan included the formation of major cities, the meeting endorsed the nonconformity with the Spanish royal family, rejected the new Spanish idea under France, declared independence at the same time, kicked out the peninsula, kicked out the peninsula as a governor, Fernandez VII Approve, each state will hold a rally Josef OrtizdeDomínguez died at the age of 61 in 1829. Unfortunately, she did not live on February 5, 1917 to see the new independent constitution being drafted in Queretaro, then declared Queretaro as the state of Mexico. She was first buried in Santa Catarina, but her body was later brought to her home to Queretaro. Josepha got the statue in Mexico City and in 1969 printed the Peso peso law. JosefaOrtízdeDomínquez has an independent spirit. As she influenced her husband to support that cause, she was able to remind the main rebel army to escape from certain prisoners. She dislikes all kinds of repression. Like other men, she is also the main character in the struggle for independence. She was remembered as "La Corregidora", "local judge"

"Reading and writing skills in various subjects is very important for the choice of life in the future. What we need to learn that children deal with various kinds of texts is very unique education and dialogue at school is". He is a professor of educational science at the university 's new Blåsenhus campus and is in charge of research on reading and writing processes. Learning to read and write is not a matter of simply "cracking code". It's about being able to use it to read and write many topics and backgrounds "Even at a very young age it will lay the foundation for children's understanding and future participation.When adults enter texts with children, explain the contents in detail and explain," Caroline Liberg I say. From an international perspective, Swedish families do a very good job of providing young children with an exciting family environment to develop handwritten languages. In the next step, children learn to read, write and understand the abstract principles of written letters. This is the focus of today's school. "But as children acquire the basic skills of reading and writing new challenges arise, children will encounter lots of text, if not early, between 3rd and 4th graders. Because the information in the text is very dense, this might be a big shock, "Caroline Liberg said. Students usually deal with themselves at this stage and face many sentences without the teacher's true support. Since the 1980s, the trend in education was to allow children to manage themselves. "But dialogue and dialogue with others is very important to learning, there are different opinions depending on the content.The contrast effect is the foundation of all learning.The topic text also has different difficulties.For example, The text is well explained sex, other textbooks may be narrative, debate, etc, but students need to learn to meet all these textbooks in terms expressed in the learning requirements of each subject there is." "At Uppsala University, we received funds to set up research laboratories to study texts in mathematics and science fields, and finance on how students handle these texts.Caroline Liberg Maintenance COWEN: But does Plato like Socrates, too? As you read these conversations, Socrates seems to be full of public opinion. I tend to use Protagoras and Sophists more. You read a conversation like Meno. "Oh, learning has to be remembered." The argument you carefully learned about this conclusion seems stupid. COWEN: This is a philosopher's dislikes. But for our readers, what would it be like if I wanted to read all the conversations that you think would have and blame it for the bottom line of the bottom line? That is not the law, but the law of Socrates. What do you think? It is noteworthy that Plato wrote "dialogue", Aristotle wrote the paper. When a person reads Plato's conversation like Aristotle's thesis, people will not understand the conversation. Reading Plato just as we read Aristotle is one of the fates that we met in an English speaking community. Previous generations of British and American thinkers have read Plato as if they are reading Aristotle's thesis. Augustine, Aristotle, the traditional language landscape seen by logical positivists, in our understanding of "metaphysics" of "subjectivity" (Descartes, Kant) as "rationality as a way of understanding" Discussed. Deep connection In this traditional figure, the symbol represents a thing (theme), but it is also a concept or image symbol (frame) in the speaker's mind. A conceptual or psychological image is the manifestation of the speaker's heart and brain.

Human eye physics Human eyes, this is a complicated but attractive organ. It has the ability to observe the various colors of the rainbow, looking at the horizon. The eyes can run fast, but fast enough to see the snail crawling across the beach. Eyes can capture objects of various angles, such as birds flying overhead and those walking around you. Yes, your eyes may be the greatest feeling a person can have. Eyes are very big and complicated. It takes a long time to write down everything about the eyes. A person is a combination of two bodies: a body and a delicate body. In truth, these two bodies are energy bodies. But the physical eyes can see the body, the two naked eyes can not see a small body. In order to know the answer to a question, you first need to understand the composition of your body. Humans are composed of five temporary sheaths - Annamaya koshas, ​​Pranamaya koshas, ​​Manom ​​aya koshas, ​​Vijnanamaya koshas and Anandamaya koshas. Annamaya coashes or food sheaths are those who stay in this physical world even after the creatures died and are provided to the fire from their families. According to a subtle world after the death of Karma, the remaining four sheaths are the reason for the next birth. In order to calm a delicate journey and to ensure that subtle bodies do not become a ghost, all cremation rituals must be made properly after death. There are two parallel worlds, one is the physical world and the other is a subtle world. The material world is full of material entities as human beings, nature and other things, and the subtle world is full of subtle entities such as spirit, ghost and good and evil. In fact, the whole physical world directly reflects this delicate word. Both are unique, but there are two ways to look. The naked eye can see the viewpoint, the spirit eye can see another viewpoint. In general, this is just a kind of cosmic energy or god, its only appearance through different entities in two different worlds. According to my research, the third one is the energy center, or chakra, present in everyone on Earth. It is either a physical gland, a gland of the pineal gland, or a quantum projector of human consciousness, which allows us to dream. French philosophers, mathematicians, and scientists René Descartes expressed it as "the main seat of the soul." I also saw it called the center of intuition and creativity. In the majority of my life, I thought this conversation was pseudoscientific, and even after experiencing my own third awakening, I was still skeptical.

Please download the answer at http://www.examtutorials.com/course/psy-360-week-1-individual-cognitive-psychology-definition-paper/ The definition of personal cognitive psychology prepares 700 to 1,050 word papers with cognitive psychology defined. Please answer the following questions: Identify at least four important milestones in cognitive psychology as discipline. Discuss the importance of behavior observation in cognitive psychology. Format your paper according to APA guidelines https://www.examtutorials.com/course/psy-360-week http://www.examtutorials.com/course/psy-360-week-1-individual-cognitive-psychology-definition-paper/Download Answer -1 - Personal Cognitive Psychology Definition / The definition of personal cognitive psychology prepares 700 to 1,050 word papers with cognitive psychology defined. Please answer the following questions: Identify at least four important milestones in cognitive psychology as discipline. Discuss the importance of behavior observation in cognitive psychology. Format your paper according to APA guidelines Running Head: Definition of Cognitive Psychology 1 Definition of Cognitive Psychology Heather Burgess PSY 360 October 24, 1013 Dr. Matt Pearcey Definition of Cognitive Psychology 2 Definition of Cognitive Psychology Cognitive psychology is about learning, memory, perception And research on the psychological processes of thinking. As an official field of psychology, its roots can go back to Descartes, which tries to explain how thinking works and proposes analogy of "hydraulic system of neural function". 2007, p. 26) He observed a moving image at Saint-Germain-en-Laye. It is not only a constant pursuit of how the mind works, but also a merciless pursuit of the spiritual composition that ultimately constitutes the basis of cognitive theory. It is clear that different approaches are needed when psychologists study how psychological processes produce behavior. It only thinks of what I learned through rewards and punishments. Cognitive psychology definition paper 2 cognitive psychology definition paper cognitive psychology test heart. Brain and mind are thought to be two different things. The brain is an organ and the brain is the result of a personal thought process. In this article we will study exactly what cognitive psychology is, milestones in the development of cognitive psychology, and behavior observation in cognitive psychology. Definition of cognitive psychology Cognitive psychology is responsible for examining psychological processes and understanding why individuals do what they are doing. Some of the principles that it examines are personal perception, learning, attention, reasoning, memory, and problem solving. Everyone's recognition is different. Individuals use her or his perception to form judgments and thoughts about her or her environment. Everyone has different learning methods, it affects the way anyone learns

Aristotle is a Greek philosopher and scientist born in 384 - 322 B.C. It was born in St. Gallen, Macedonia. His father played an important role in society as a royal court doctor. Young Aristotle likes Plato and decided to go to his university at the age of 17. Aristotle as a student and as a teacher for the next 20 years was first there. After the death of Plato, Aristotle moved to Asos of Asia Asia, where he advised her friend Elmias, decided to marry his niece. Please refer to Aristotle and Aristotleism, René Descartes and Descartesism, Epicurean and Epicureanism, Religiousism about biographies of the main philosopher of the West and related movement. Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel and Hegelianism, Immanuel Kant and Kantism, Karl Marx and Marxism, Plato and Platonism, Pythagoras and Pythagoreanism. To cover a specific field of Western philosophy, see Aesthetics, Epistemology, Ethics, Thought, Logic, Metaphysics, Biological Philosophy, Educational Philosophy, History Philosophy, Legal Philosophy, Mathematics Philosophy, Mathematics Philosophy. Philosophy Philosophy, Religious Philosophy, Science Philosophy Research on Aristotle's philosophy has influenced the thought of the late Neo-Renaissance. One of the main focus of Aristotle's philosophy is the concept of his systemic logic. Aristotle's goal is to propose a universal process of reasoning that allows people to learn everything possible about reality. The initial process describes objects based on object characteristics, presence state, and actions. In his philosophical paper Aristotle is also discussing ways human beings can get information about things through deductions and reasoning. For Aristotle, reasoning is a reasonable argument, his deductive theory that "when one is decided, the other must appear for their existence" is what philosophers are now calling The basis of syllabic theory is logical. Arguments for inferring conclusions from two or more other forms of some premise Aristotle is a Greek philosopher and scientist born in 384 - 322 B.C. It was born in St. Gallen, Macedonia. His father played an important role in society as a royal court doctor. Young Aristotle likes Plato and decided to go to his university at the age of 17. Aristotle as a student and as a teacher for the next 20 years was first there. - Summary of the rationale of Aristotle's geomorphology: Every time we meet an unknown person, our initial judgment, even if it was reluctant, is often a subconscious from him or her is. The start of the event. Since the character can be is to be only properly identified by the observed words and actions over a period of time, we must rely on what can be seen immediately in the first glance.

The strike and "myth of transfer" will be announced at the APA conference to be held in Washington DC in the eastern district of Washington DC from December 27 to 30, 1998. : Book Discussion: Wilfrid Silas' empiricalism and philosophy of mind (International Ballroom West, Wednesday 30 December, 1:30 pm - 4:30 pm) - Presentation by Professor Alston. As the subject of this paper becomes very critical, I would like to first admire Empiricism and Philosophy of the Mind (EPM) as one of the pioneering work of the philosophy of the 20th century. Sirasia's predicament was originally proposed by Wilfrid Silas, a rich but difficult paper "Empiricism and Philosophy of the Mind". The main purpose of this article Silas is to destroy the entire framework given ((1963), p. 128). Discussion of "given" is common in the early form of fundamentalism (see, for example, C. I. Lewis (1929), chapter 2). The expression "given" refers to the empirical factor known soon in experience. For example, if a person sees a lush golf course, it is said that the feeling of green is being experienced. At the moment of Descartes, it may be wondering whether a person actually perceives a golf course, but he insists that it can not reasonably doubt that there is a green feeling. Strong fundamentalists are attractive to practical experience. In "empiricism and spiritual philosophy", Shiras believes that the concept given is a myth. Do you have any basic observation knowledge? Wilfrid Sellars (1963) is known for this problem in the face of what he calls the given myth. Part of the traditional epistemological appeal to the concept of observation of pure or direct knowledge is the view that such knowledge can be a basic knowledge. This is knowledge given to us by experience, which may be the case of knowledge, but conceptually simple. However, Silas thinks that they are conceptually not that simple. When clarifying "a given myth", the Wilfred seller challenged the foundation by further exploring the perspective of the empiricist (and thus the basis of knowledge) from another perspective. He challenged the foundation of empiricism and proved that all knowledge is language / proposition. It can not be used as a basis for inferring knowledge. The position of Silas is anti-fundamental in order to eliminate the level and grounds of knowledge. It is only "giving" all other reasoning.

Scientific view This is a universally accepted truth and his ideas go beyond his time and beyond his companion His compatriots do not understand him, may be criticized, persecuted not. Galilei Galileo, Francis Bacon, and Rene Descartes were in the first person who suggested ways to escape from traditional ideas, find and locate scientific places in society. All three authors agreed on a specific point, This type of recognition of truth attracts the appeal of science, but in the end it does not pay attention to the means. Taking into account this half way of view of science, we accept Plato's decision that "poetry is closer to important truth than history". We learn to support incomplete theories and sentences, including insights into the truth, not digestive systems without valuable suggestions. A smart writer will feel it by announcing an undiscovered thinking area, to best respond to the purpose of learning or writing, and to convey new activities to a foolish spirit by hope. Recently, there has been much debate about data science in Nigerian business circle, and a considerable number of practitioners may ignore their true nature. According to training data on Cloudera's data science, data science is ultimately aimed at clarifying the business value of the organization and conveying it as a practical insight to stakeholders. At a very high level, data science is designed to solve business problems. Reduce costs or generate revenue. This approach to solving business problems is based on research that is highly scientific and highly structured. So, rather than simply talking about using data from several Python / R libraries to attack data. We are working on solving real problems and creating real value. Young researchers easily forget that many of the problems we were trying to solve today were not considered by predecessors quarter century ago. It is also easy to overlook that HGP still provides insights to people pursuing large scale scientific projects. In fact, I believe the success of today's consortium-based science depends on the six important lessons of the Human Genome Project. Accept partnership. If necessary, the Human Genome Project broke the pattern of individual researchers and left it isolated to answer a small number of scientific questions. It also violates hypothetical led research, but focuses on finding basic information that can be useful for many follow-up surveys.

Convincing papers are somewhat similar to controversial papers, but they tend to be gentle and gentle. The discussing article asks you to discuss different attacks and attacks, and persuasive articles try to convince the reader that you have reliable arguments. In other words, you are not an opponent, but a supporter. Introduction: This is the beginning of your article. Hooks for attracting the reader's attention, and the papers and discussions described in the next section. Body: This is the core of your article, usually 3-5 paragraphs. In each paragraph, we examine the topic or question that was used to support the thesis. Conclusion: This is the last paragraph of your paper. Among them, you will summarize the main points of the body and link them to your thesis. Convincing papers often use conclusions as the last appeal to viewers Learning how to write persuasive articles is a basic skill that people use every day in business, law, media and entertainment. English students can start writing convincing articles at any skill level. You will find one or two sample topics from the list of less than 100 convincing papers that you definitely categorized in difficulty. Write samples of articles about given local plastic surgery. Orthopedic papers are answers, people have already provided excellent partners and are publishing convincing papers on the theme of advertising in Vancouver. A persuasive article: Animal experiments Animal experiments have benefited human health, because this article outlines that people are no longer infected with polio. Knowing how to create a perfect convincing speech syllabus makes the whole writing process easier for all students. A convincing paper on orthopedic surgery research paper outlines orthopedic surgery (2) March 22, 2011 Persuasive dissertation (Orthopedic surgery. When people listen to the word orthopedic surgery, cosmetic surgery rebuilds Surgical reconstructive surgery tends to think that there is not much to think Surgical reconstructive surgery restores or improves physical defects in physical shape and function after childbirth, abuse, accidents and illness Summary of orthopedic speech Ashley King's epic officially describes a phenomenological analysis thesis in a persuasive whole surgical article. Linguistic research theme of pregnancy and linguistic research theme of ideology Elc sample preparation for the development of the audience sets ppt natural beauty English homework rd draft theme for high school welfare college of homework argument. xrd xrf Comparison descartes Publication of an article The example of a boy compares contrasts to write my thesis. Rogeria's argument gets self-esteem from females and teaches students to follow Razan

When she said that, this argument was rejected by the female statue "reaction of fairies to husband" in the poem. 5) - 6) It should be noted that these lines reflect the next line of Murrow 's poetry. "We will sit on the rock and we will see the shepherds eat a shallow river of their flocks" (ll.5-7)) The passage of time drawn in the season is in the Marlow poetry Because of changing the characteristics of these matters explained by the male character of men, the role of women impairs the idealization of the shepherd's countryside and pastoral living. Emotions and Reasons: Sir Walter · Laurie 's "Fairy Responsible Shepherd" and Christopher Marlow's "Passionate Shepherds Love him" Literary Analysis Compared to a glance At first glance, especially related to carpet poetry Given the handling of the subject matter, Horace 's statement may have a real link which seems to be a reasonable and logical statement. It represents the concept of answering Descartes' counter arguments and knowledge, how to obtain and define it, and represents the concept of true intelligence. By using wax experiments you can find, define and explain real intelligence. In this word, he reveals the truth we find through basic perceptual tools and senses, depending on how particular things are defined, or even deep knowledge that even if they exist I would like to prove that. Comparison of Sir Walter Laurie's "Shepherd's Response to the Shepherd" and Christopher Marlow's "Affectionate Shepherd" Sir Walter Rowley wrote "Sidhe to the Shepherd" in 1600. In response to Christopher Marlow's "passionate shepherd who loves him" written in 1599 by a shepherd, "respond". "Passionate shepherds love him", the shepherd uses porn and hidden sexual images to try to deceive nymphs to have sex with him. - Rejection to the Shepherd of Nymph "Reactions to Shepherds of Nymph" is a poem by Sir Walter Raleigh, who expressed the response to Christopher Marlow's poem "passionate shepherds love him" is. The reason why Nymph gave her refusal was just an excuse; the real reason she made the shepherd disappointed is that she lacked love for him.

Descartes once said "The greatest idea can have the greatest vices and greatest virtues." This idea also applies to Richard Cornell's "The Most Dangerous Game". The short story was first published in 1924, about a hunter from Sanger Rainsford, New York on board ship from the United States to Rio de Janeiro. In the middle of the Caribbean, Rainsford fell into the water and hurried to the nearby island. He came to another hunter mansion on the island and soon discovered that Hunter was more dangerous than he thought. According to the controversial theory of Giuliano Pisani, vice and virtue are read from one side of the altar to the opposite side (final examination), and that sequence is not "vice, then virtue" for many years. It goes from Vice 1 (Stultitia) (North wall, right side) to Virtue 1 (Prudencia) (South wall, left side), Vice 2 (irregular) (North Wall) to Virtue 2 (Fortitudo) (South side) Continue. Such). Bad habits and virtues symbolize the progress of human beings (happiness of the sky) to happiness. With the help of virtue, humans can overcome obstacles (bad habits). This is a philosophy designed by Giotto theologian - a journey of theology, a knowledge-rich theologian who draws inspiration from St. Augustine According to average doctrine, not only courage, but most moral virtues are between two accompanying evils. He explained the twelve advantages of obeying this pattern. All strengths and weaknesses are created by response to specific appetite and desire. His analysis is summarized in this table: Among 12 virtues, Aristotle's vertex is confident. It includes the proper importance of what we deserve and the honor of society providing us. For example, a person with confidence does not become embarrassed or unhappy when faced with danger or paying money. The doctrine of virtue doctrine in virtue ethics is between two bad habits. For example, courage is virtue, which exists between recklessness and timidity. Honor is virtue, but going too far is self-critical and humiliating. Psychological guidelines state that A and B are the same person only if A and B are strongly psychologically related. Psychological Relationship Body Standard pointed out

Cognitive psychology definition paper 2 cognitive psychology definition paper cognitive psychology test heart. Brain and mind are thought to be two different things. The brain is an organ and the brain is the result of a personal thought process. In this article we will study exactly what cognitive psychology is, milestones in the development of cognitive psychology, and behavior observation in cognitive psychology. Definition of cognitive psychology Cognitive psychology is responsible for examining psychological processes and understanding why individuals do what they are doing. Some of the principles that it examines are personal perception, learning, attention, reasoning, memory, and problem solving. Everyone's recognition is different. Individuals use her or his perception to form judgments and thoughts about her or her environment. Everyone has different learning methods, it affects the way anyone learns Running Head: Definition of Cognitive Psychology 1 Definition of Cognitive Psychology Heather Burgess PSY 360 October 24, 1013 Dr. Matt Pearcey Definition of Cognitive Psychology 2 Definition of Cognitive Psychology Cognitive psychology is about learning, memory, perception And research on the psychological processes of thinking. As an official field of psychology, its roots can go back to Descartes, which tries to explain how thinking works and proposes analogy of "hydraulic system of neural function". 2007, p. 26) He observed a moving image at Saint-Germain-en-Laye. It is not only a constant pursuit of how the mind works, but also a merciless pursuit of the spiritual composition that ultimately constitutes the basis of cognitive theory. It is clear that different approaches are needed when psychologists study how psychological processes produce behavior. It only thinks of what I learned through rewards and punishments.

Previously from middle English, inlighten, inlightnen, a mixture inspired from middle English ("inspire, illuminate"), from old English inlīhtan, onlīhtan, enlīhten ("to light up," " lightnen ("inspire, illuminate") (same as light + -en) Dutch inlichten ("Introduction, information"), old high German inliuhten ("Introduction, Illuminations"), Gothic ???????? ? (Inliuhtjan, "enlighten", "illuminate"). More inlight, -en Enlightenment (Third person singular form is now realized, now inspiration of participle, simple past and past participle understood) On 30th October 2016, Bernie Evans wrote to the Guardian Big Question as follows. The real responsibility lies in our dangerous hatred of politics. Rather than focusing on genuine dramas that might stimulate the audience, the BBC focuses not on its dramatic output to incorrect historical soap operas, but on conservative politics about that threat It is feared by the house. Please prove our past opinion. As your commentator shows, translators and publishers are aiming to help workers move by stimulating today's movements by providing lessons from the past. Mr. Pexnif warns that it should not be laughing or circling a dear friend and you have to clearly understand that you either answer your questions directly or refuse to be inside yourself not. I gave him inspiration for the mentioned topic Okay, men and girls, ready to enlightenment In this lesson I will introduce enlightenment. what is that? Enlightenment, also known as the age of enlightenment, was an intellectual movement from the late 17th century to the early 18th century, emphasizing reasons, individualism, and skepticism. Enlightenment challenged the traditional religious view. Because that was such a wide movement, enlightenment did not have an accurate start date. It did not pop up, but it gradually developed. Most historians came to the beginning of enlightenment from the middle of the 17th century to the beginning of the 18th century. The work of intellectuals like Rene Descartes, Barus Spinoza, Isaac Newton is particularly important for enlightenment. In particular, British enlightenment depends on the merit of Sir Isaac Newton whose "principle" shocked the world. His Opticks provided a perfect image of their intelligent enlightenment plan to enlightened thinkers by revealing the nature of the light. As Pope Alexander said, Voltaire is so admiring Newton that his mistress is "Venus - Newton." Newton's physics promises to unleash all the secrets of nature using just reason - do not forget that Newton believes in revelation and reason and writes many comments about the Bible.

In the creation and evolutionary society, there are various problems that led to intense debate. There was always conflict between the scientific community and religious society. This theme happens to be creationism rather than evolution theory. Of course, the scientific community supports the theory of evolution, religious organizations strongly support creationism. This will be a continuing struggle between church and science, because neither party has solid evidence to support their view. Creation and Evolution "Creation and Evolution" Please read this question a couple of times to see what's wrong with this title. We have all heard of this argument. The idea of ​​Genesis, the idea that God created all the seeds emerging today, and the evolutionary theory, the evolution of all life from simple bacteria to all species emerging today, is a well-known argument. Since first announcing "evolution" with his 1859 controversial book "Origin", he published his book "The Origin of Natural Selection Seed" and proposed evolution. This book and other books have begun discussion for many years between evolutionist and creationist. Were we created by supernatural supernatural existence, or did our creation happen accidentally? Let's start with two inconsistent theories. The general usage of the word "evolution" is that our world creatures exist through a natural process without guides. Evolution theory and evolution theory explain the fact. Creationism is a myth that explains the facts. Evolutionism is proved by facts, creationism is a story about facts. It is always interesting to learn about science and religion, but it is interesting to understand that science produces facts and that all creationists (religions) can be discussed through evolution theory. Therefore, while evolutionists provide evidence, creationists try Galileo, Copernicus, Bacon, Descartes, and thinkers who challenge biblical hypotheses using empirically deduced scientific theory. . The Catholic Church called this ideology of creationism as heresy and thus has a bad habit of suppressing complete disarray of the Bible to some extent. For centuries the scientific research has evolved into the theory of big bang and evolution, although it is mainly such a place.

Hume: Bad practices and virtue philosophy are studies of general and basic problems such as existence, reality, knowledge, values, human thoughts, and questions about languages. "Therefore, I am a famous quotation that attempts to define this study very easily, and the philosophers quoted are the widely considered fathers of modern philosophy, the 17th century French Renée Descartes ". David Hume is a Scottish of the 18th century and is considered by many to be the most important British philosopher in history. In his work "Humanity theory", David Hume divides virtues into two categories, artificial virtue and natural virtue. Hume pointed out that courage is a natural virtue in paper. Among the paper's "pride and humility, its purpose and cause", Hume clearly shows that courage is the cause of pride. Witness, goodwill, learning, courage, justice, honesty, all these are the reasons for pride, and the opposite of their humility. Hume discussed a wide catalog of special virtues and vices. His story in "thesis" is based on the distinction between "natural" virtue and "human" virtue, which can easily be misunderstood. The question is not whether some virtues are fake or imitation, and whether other virtues are genuine or not. The problem is whether some people rely on social rules and customs, but others do not. Organizing his catalog by this distinction deals with people who believe that Hume emerges from people who think morality as a complete tradition (eg Bernard Mandeville) and social customs that it is independent of social customs Francis Hutcheson) According to Hume's view, some virtues depend on social customs, but others are not (Cohon 2008: 162-163). In both cases, he is trying to explain why people tend to develop these characteristics, and why they tend to pick sensible spectators.

Breathe pure freedom. The breathing process, the ritual, the essence of existence, this is a human democratic process, this is human's greatest democratic process, allowing their soul to breathe through self-protection, which protects humans can do. As Descartes said, mankind and existence can be thought of as "ergogogito total". Thoughts allow existence to reach points through logic, streamlining and deliberation. First of all, let's examine the balance of power between the world's two big processes, self-defense and national defense. Self-defense includes energy consumption in these behaviors, as well as modifications to structures and functions that tend to maintain human life afterwards. Racial protection includes energy consumption of these actions, as well as modifications to the structures and functions that tend to maintain ethnic living, and even complete complete sacrifice of individuals. You should clearly remember this unique distinction. Self defense and ethnic protection are by no means the same process, they are often the opposite. Self-defense develops characteristics that enable them to succeed in "struggle for survival" by using nature choice, individual-engaging institutions and functions that directly benefit Self-defense instincts naturally extend to families. In a sense, the people we love are part of ourselves. This is obvious to children as the same evolutionary logic as creating self-defense instinct is suitable for preserving the future generation - and perhaps even more so. But the same applies to your spouse, parents, brothers and sisters, and other relatives. Society is built on the extension of this principle. Large families, families, and tribes are all born of the idea that defending themselves is not only acceptable but moral. Political construction - Expand self defense to streamline and lead instincts, create greater, more diverse groups that are more prosperous than tribes and tribes

Elimination of materialism in folk psychology of hilly areas Since Descartes proposed it in the 16th century, mental and physical problems have always kept philosophers busy. The central problem of mind and body problems is the relationship between what we call body and what we call mind - private, abstract, the origin of all thought, another public, concrete Person, executor of command, spiritual thing. Paul Churchland is a supporter of the materialistic view and thinks that the solution to the problem of mind and body is to eliminate a single concept - the psychological concept of the mental state - that will cause this problem to exist forever It is. Churchill has three arguments to support the exclusion of materialism. First, folk psychology can not explain general activities such as sleep, learning, intelligence, psychosis. Since folk psychology has existed for thousands of years, there is no lack of time to understand the details brought about by folk psychology. Second, the history of ideas supports the elimination of the old conceptual framework. The concept of citizen movement was completely replaced by Newtonian physics and left a trace. The cosmology, the folk notion of fire and folklore are equally exhilarating. Since conscious intellectual phenomena is more complicated and difficult to understand than any of the above, it is hard to say that people's idea about our consciousness is right. Third, it is extremely impossible to simplify folk psychology into neurobiology. Reducing the need for specific principles in the theory and types of things is consistent with simplification theory There are several ways to eliminate materialism, but they all believe that our common sense "fork psychology" distorts the essence of a recognized aspect badly. Eliminators such as Patricia and Paul Church Lund, folk psychology basically recognize recognition as a similar sentence, but prove that the neural network theory and the non-verbal vector / matrix model of the connectionist are the brain A more accurate description of the mechanism that he believes to be false. Church zones often quote other popular theories and ontological fate of other mistakes that have emerged in the historical process. For example, Ptolemy's astronomy has been used to explain and roughly predict the movement of planets for centuries, but eventually this solar system model is eliminated, which is beneficial for the Copernicus model. To elucidate the mystery that complicates the body and mind, Paul Churchland and other supporters of the elimination of materialism came up with a number of publicly attacked arguments in folk psychology. According to philosophers eliminating materialism, when we eliminate the biggest obstacles in the concept of mental state in folk psychology, only from understanding the complex but realistic reality of the body and the mind The way of will be accepted. It is impossible for Churchland to match the physical condition with the corresponding psychological state in the fierce battle against the emotions of folk psychologists and people suggested by folk psychology are excluded from human ontology I think that it should be done. Eliminate the name of materialism. This view became a materialistic approach that Churchland claimed to exclude human thought.

Morality has played an important role that is not always recognized in defining ethics. Principles are often virtues that apply only to society and can be distinguished from law, religion, or morality. Morals in a definite sense may differ from each other, depending on the foundation of the society that asserts that morality. Different societies have different understanding of the meaning of moral priorities. When others concentrate on practice, their ethics can be based on purity and honesty. Many philosophers encourage morality. Because it usually prevents and avoids harm to the society that forms a particular group. The most interesting ethical concepts appear in the question of whether to show more. Due to our human nature, we have certain moral obligations - painful or happy experiences, our family restrictions, or these approvals or disapprovals. In a survey of his moral principle, Hume said: "The end of all moral speculation is to teach ourselves our own responsibilities, and through the proper expression of bad habits and virtues, Let's avoid us and hold one more hug. "(Hume, p. 177). Philosophers are not trying to imagine human rationality and scientific behavior like Descartes but are trying to explain human facts. He compiled these facts into a very general principle even if it was small. By doing so, he found reasons why people approve or oppose some moral behavior. Hume's philosophy as a whole is based on verification of humanity. And his knowledge from sensory experience and exam. Hume believes knowledge comes from experience and observation, even in physical or mathematical competitions. But moral judgment depends on passion and emotion to define approval and disapproval. Hume has a fairly positive and natural view of the moral judgment in Hume's theory, that is, moral sentiment. Approval and disapproval must be tied together by feelings and emotions. If morality comes from emotion, There are many definitions of the essence of philosophical exploration of morals and ethics. Moral or moral philosophy is the quest for the morally valuable and ordered nature of behavior, that is, the nature of how human behavior should be. What is this (moral condemnation) coming from? Morally speaking, the most basic question sounds like "What is the ultimate benefit for us to fight?" "Why do you choose this behavior instead of others?" This moral dilemma? "Should not morally do good behavior and should not take morally correct action?" "Finally" Why do we act ethically? "Or" Why do we want morality? " Ethics, also known as moral philosophy, is a field of philosophy focused on research on correct questions, false questions and how we should live. Morals include making moral decisions about right or wrong, good or bad. Whether it is true or wrong is the quality or moral judgment we give to our behavior. Ethical research has three areas of meta ethics including methods, language, logical structure, and reasoning to explain ethical terms. Moral or moral philosophical research can describe the theory of whether it is right or wrong systematically. Moral philosophy is usually divided into three categories: meta ethics, applied ethics, normative ethics. Meta - ethics studies our moral values ​​of where languages ​​and principles came from, and what they mean. And provide a practical solution to ethical problems. Normative ethics studies ethical standards that influence legitimacy and fraud. The theory of normative ethics includes utilitarianism, consequentialism, contractileism, virtue ethics, and so on.

Evolution and creation in the American school system "God, God, God!" My ear sounded my father's latest speech. Attendance to his church was not very consistent, so I mainly learned about Christianity through his own teachings. This lesson is related to our creation. He explained how God formed the first man Adam from dust and formed the first female Eve from Adam's ribs after 6 days of creation and carnival. In the early days of my life my father's faith was myself. He became a good Catholic child for me, and because there are no other options, I became a good Catholic child. An overview of the creation and evolution of school professors: evolutionary and creative education in the public school system is controversial. Charles Darwin announced his evolutionary conclusion in 1859. This dramatically changed the science of education in public school systems (Armenta, 1). Several lawsuits have been filed for evolutionary education. - Discussion between evolutionism and creative evolutionism and creationism has been on for a long time. When Charles Darwin proposed the origin of species in 1859, this was when the discussion began completely. The first discussion on evolution and creation in litigation took place in a 1925 trial. Evolution has been removed from textbooks and courses. Evolution began to infiltrate textbooks in 1987 Evolutionism is considerably younger than religious beliefs of creation and creation. Prior to Charles Darwin, evolution was a devout idea, and God as a creator was believed to be widely accepted. However, since Darwin introduced his evolution theory a century and a half ago, discussion about theory and creation always existed. - It is a modest expression that claims almost no conflict in the realm of faith and reason. From the earliest stage of scientific exploration, these two areas of thought fell into a vicious circle and gave up as the religion gradually modernized to adapt to the new understanding of the universe. Evolution theory and evolution theory explain the fact. Creationism is a myth that explains the facts. Evolutionism is proved by facts, creationism is a story about facts. It is always interesting to learn about science and religion, but it is interesting to understand that science produces facts and that all creationists (religions) can be discussed through evolution theory. Therefore, while evolutionists provide evidence, creationists try Galileo, Copernicus, Bacon, Descartes, and thinkers who challenge biblical hypotheses using empirically deduced scientific theory. . The Catholic Church called this ideology of creationism as heresy and thus has a bad habit of suppressing complete disarray of the Bible to some extent. For centuries the scientific research has evolved into the theory of big bang and evolution, although it is mainly such a place.

John Locke said that everyone has indivisible natural rights at birth. As a human being, we have the right to life, liberty and wealth. Locke's social contract theory gains the concept of defining and analyzing how this theory implies freedom. As a society, we are free to a certain extent. For social coexistence, people must abandon their sovereignty over the government to profit and maintain social order. Locke said that life would be "annoying, savage, short-lived" without the authority of the government. The human narrative is a quest for increasing freedom of individuals. America is a very successful experiment of liberal democracy. In other words, we are not free. We are pretty free. We are not democratic. Indeed, in many ways, we look like a republic. The election campaign elects the president every four years because the founder really do not trust people. "People" means Caucasians who owned the land at that time. The founder wanted a mechanism to hide the "wrong" decision of the gentleman of the land. Women and African Americans are not even granted the right to make "mistaken" decisions. I am a determinist, so in my opinion life is not a free roaming but a complex roller coaster. Therefore, we can not choose freely, but it is free to experience what is happening around us. There is no freedom to act, but perhaps we have a free experience. Is this really free? So, as long as the certainty is nearly correct, we may be trapped in a roller coaster and the eyes may be opened. There is no choice at any point in our life. However, if you live in ignorance or do not believe in determinism, you can "experience freedom" even if you do not actually have it. I certainly saw someone who is fully confident. This is the closest we can get Discussion of free will is complex and diverse. We both realize that arguments about freedom can be discussed by saying that we are free and determined to respond. PN 62, as Craigros said in compatibility, we may have plenty of free and solid views and improvements. He completed his work and insisted that we must choose between two extreme opposing views - freedom and determinism. I will make this selection here. Discussion on free will developed into a network of arguments and refutations. On the other hand, there is a philosopher like Descartes who expresses this as "free to be freely restrained in nature". This view is called liberalism. But scientifically, unfortunately, in many aspects of philosophy, the doctrine of determinism - our behavior is determined by previous event causation - is assumed in more cases. I am for freedom

JSTOR is part of ITHAKA, a nonprofit organization that supports academic institutions to use digital technology to protect academic records and promote research and education in a sustainable way. © 2000-2018 ita ka. Copyright JSTOR®, JSTOR logo, JPASS®, and ITHAKA® are registered trademarks of ITHAKA. Artstor® is a registered trademark of Artstor Inc. ITHAKA is an authorized dealer of Artstor Inc. Plato 's theory of remembrance is a reasonable solution to the men' s knowledge paradox. The general theme is the theory of recall of Plato. Plato 's theory of remembrance is a reasonable solution to the men' s knowledge paradox. In many of his conversations Plato often concludes that we can not understand something through five senses. He often concludes that we are familiar with our knowledge in former existence. In Meno, Socrates said, "Because the soul is immortal, born frequently, and since we saw everything here and underground, nothing was learned, so that was what it was known before I can remember You will not be surprised ... "Many Plato works Plato 's theory of recollection won a few followers of western epistemology. Socrates taught Meno to prove this, in that case the memory argument disappears. Besides, before birth, especially in the Christian era, considering that the soul was a creation doctrine from scratch from the earliest days of life, the doctrine that existed before the soul was almost universally ignored It was. Meanwhile, Plato had not considered another option, ie, the soul began to exist "preloaded", it can be said to be knowledge or at least potential knowledge. This view stands out especially in Descartes' the "innate concept" theory. Plato's "recall theory" can be traced back to the idea detailed by him in the "Meno" dialogue. Essentially, Plato believes that our soul has an existing state. But in the current situation, it loses this knowledge, and all learning refers to the process of remembering this knowledge.

Islamic views on evolution and creation Since the 1800's, the evolutionary impact far exceeds the limits of biology. In fact, this effect is increasing, and today evolution has become an important intellectual in the west. Science and religion shaped the values ​​and thoughts of Western society, everyone played a very important role and gave a profound impression to society. Most authors today think that science and religion are very contrasting with companies and basically do not have anything in common. Evolution theory and evolution theory explain the fact. Creationism is a myth that explains the facts. Evolutionism is proved by facts, creationism is a story about facts. It is always interesting to learn about science and religion, but it is interesting to understand that science produces facts and that all creationists (religions) can be discussed through evolution theory. Therefore evolutionists provided evidence and creationists tried many other thinkers who used scientific theories empirically inferred to challenge Galileo, Copernicus, Bacon, Descartes, and the Biblical hypothesis I will try to. . The Catholic Church called this ideology of creationism as heresy and thus has a bad habit of suppressing complete disarray of the Bible to some extent. For centuries the scientific research has evolved into the theory of big bang and evolution, although it is mainly such a place. Creation and Evolution "Creation and Evolution" Please read this question a couple of times to see what's wrong with this title. We have all heard of this argument. The idea of ​​Genesis, the idea that God created all the seeds emerging today, and the evolutionary theory, the evolution of all life from simple bacteria to all species emerging today, is a well-known argument. Since Darwin first published "evolution" with his 1859 controversial book "Origin", he published his book "The Origin of Natural Selection Seed" and proposed evolution. This book and other books have begun discussion for many years between evolutionist and creationist. Are we created by supernatural supernatural existence, or is coincidence that our creation is occurring? Let's start with two inconsistent theories. The general usage of the word "evolution" is that our world creatures exist through a natural process without guides.

Nietzsche is a portrait of fragmented characters called by him, by Nietzsche, linked with "freedom of spirit" (complicated) which is philosopher with freedom and freedom "spirit of good and evil" new chapter And beyond entering the spirit of freedom In the rest of good and evil, he magnified the portrait and associated with another type of "new philosopher", he specified. As I see it, Nietzsche himself as "free spirit" and the concept "new philosopher." Nietzsche spent a lot of time explaining the two types of traits. In this wonderful novel philosophy Nietzsche, like Nietzsche, presents an impressive pathway to discuss the country, a new idol. This is Nietzsche, which ultimately involves a self-destructive major war of the 20th century of the second, but through the young German delegation seeking unity through the promotion of a strong nation's form, forgetting It will not. He was a young supporter of Bismarck, but he was a conservative politician of the famous Prussian who unified Germany in 1871. He adopted a nationalistic attitude and demanded racial purity, politics. A great mission, common history and the highest intellectual and sophisticated goal to support, not to political or war of the Hohenzollern dynasty for the purpose of excellence. " Nietzsche defines his own ideal of a mature free mind, his so-called "free spirit", that he keeps himself leaving "all certainty of all faith and desire" was. (GS 347) - About the minor rope and the possibility, near the abyss dance, though. In addition to the content of this paragraph, according to the experiments up to Volume 5 of "Gay Science", the content of the repetition of risks, risks and ambiguities - Heidegger combines the tendencies seeking certainty of Nietzsche and Descartes. https://the-eye.eu/public/concen.org/UChicagoPress.Ebook.Pack-2016-PHC/9780226259819.UChicago%20Press.Nietzsche%27s%20Enlightenment_%20The% 20Free-Spirit%20Trilogy% 20of%20the% 20 Middle% 20 Period.Paul% 20 Franco.Oct% 2 C2011.pdf Are these freewheel politics how to control the certainty of your rider? In Nepal, in order to solve this problem, we adopted the motto "We are homeless". He is described as a free spirit of homeless, as they live in a "fragile, broken transition period" - the ideal future with death between ideal and fetus. This is not the first time that modern era Nietzsche explained as the first five volumes of the transition period (see GS 343356358). Because this is a transitional period, the free spirit is not 'conservative' - nothing worthy of protection https://the-eye.eu/public/concen.org/UChicagoPress.Ebook.Pack-2016-PHC/9780226259819.UChicago%20Press.Nietzsche%27s%20Enlightenment_%20The% 20Free-Spirit%20Trilogy% 20of%20the% 20 Middle% 20 Period.Paul% 20 Franco.Oct% 2 C2011.pdf

The symbolic problem of philosophically lost work is inseparable from quoting "people of the world" from a conscious perspective. The space and time categories are beyond his conscience. "Wanderers are everywhere" is a metaphysical hero, and if you move along the scenery of thinking, it will absolutely move freely, even in the form of (heart) state or time. Because all of these are forms of life, travelers are metaphysical. In 1905, Russell announced "About Denoting", one of the most influential articles in the philosophy of the 20th century. This paper applies symbolic logic to long-term philosophical problems, ie non-existent problems. In 1905, France was a republic without a king. In this case, what does the meaning of "now the French King" mean? Did not mention anything? For something that does not exist? The solution of Russell, except for the sentence context, is that this expression is "a clear explanation" (see below) and has no meaning. Therefore, "Here is the Baldness of the King of France" means that there is only one king in France, and this person is bald. This sentence is very meaningful and very wrong. This handling of non-existent problems is an example of so-called "analytical philosophy" which is the dominant philosophy of today's English speaking countries. Russell and G. E. were recognized together. Is it text written for students? Philosophy has existed for centuries before the Christian era and became the basis of modern philosophy. However, the early philosophy was related to the world of symbols and myths - the oriental philosophy is still largely there. The important thing is that Jesus did not bring in a new philosophy. He speaks in the symbol, and his life is recorded in the form of a myth. The mystery of Christianity represents the revival and realization of the old mystery. The gap between the doctrine of philosophy and traditional psychology is a product of progressive 'schizophrenia' and recession era. A perennial philosophy is included in the teachings of traditional psychology and theology Philosophy of the heart is a field of philosophy to study the essence of the mind. Although other problems such as difficulty of consciousness and the nature of a particular state of mind are solved, the problem of mind and body is a paradigm in the philosophy of the mind. The spiritual aspects of this research include psychological events, psychological functions, psychological attributes, consciousness, the existence theory of mind, the essence of thinking, the relationship between the mind and the body. Dualism and monism are two central ideas about mind and body, and although there are minor differences, they are not perfectly suited to either one. Dualism is present in both the East and the West tradition (Hindu philosophy and Plato's Sankhya and yoga school), but its entry into the Western philosophy is due to the 17th century René Descartes

Albert Camus's "The Stranger" told a man who does not care about the future, and does not care about the future, Meursault, the future. He has no meaning, no reason, no feeling. On an important day at the beach, Mersau shot and killed Arabs. And it brought about a series of events that led to his death. Through the judicial process, Albert crowns with criticism about the community in which he lives and the value he has. Strangers are prestigious works that crowd their thoughts and are the basis of Professor Abhiri's title. To complement your proposal, there have been lots of wonderful literature on the coronation ceremony recently. Faithful fans of Sherman's coronation ceremony, Foley's Albert Camus, worthy of living in Zaretsky's life: from absurd to uprising (though he thinks exaggerating the situation) Srigley's crown "Criticism of contemporaryity To explore his social and political corruption with Sartre in detail, Aronson's Camus and Sartre books make full use of communication and prose and are useful. disagree. He is not from his criticism of existentialism but a very different philosopher who sees much better at first at his work (these criticisms are not all in the same place, ) And communication will be expanded). It is definitely from a stranger, Sisyphus' myth (all the references he did are a bit difficult, but the first two chapters are worth it), from Revolted Man and others. Note: The coronation ceremony is named after the philosopher Albert Camas. He makes different interpretations of absurd views. However, it is generally considered that absurdity is a confrontation between self and the world. Absurdity is the difference between desire and material reality. The Camus system wants to provide the user with the difference between the desire for the result of the data and the actual situation. One of my favorite things is Albert Camus, which explains the absurdity as a metaphysical tension arising from conflict between our conscious facts and the facts Descartes speaks. Camus said the reality of our consciousness is related to the fact that we are in a meaningless life. This has no meaning. Considering our position in space and what happens in the universe, it is difficult to find sensible meanings. The whole field of philosophy is called nihilism. Nietzsche is talking about where we are and what it means, and you draw out a cold conclusion that it may not mean anything at all. It's hard, so he calls it ridiculous, so why do you call it anything else?

Steve Jobs was born in San Francisco, California on February 24, 1955 and died on October 5, 2011. He is an influential, innovative global leader and welcomed as a dreamer of our time, the Wall Street Journal named him "a 10-year-old man." In 2007, Fortune magazine ranked Jobs as the most powerful businessman among the top 25. US President Barack Obama (2011) said in a novel by Steve Jobs, "The world has lost foresight and Steve's success may not exceed the world, Steve Jobs is Apple's co-founder and CEO, and founder and CEO of W. He is a co-founder and CEO of Apple. Who is Steve Jobs? We told him that he is a genius, but we do not understand the word, and we did not say the meaning of that word. Steve Jobs is a thinker. Thinkers of the same meaning, Heidegger and White, Rock and Descartes, Hobbes, Cervantes, Leonardo da Vinci, Aquinas, Caesar, Alexander, Aristotle, Plato are all thinkers. I am included in Leonardo da Vinci, Caesar and Alexander, although they are not usually thought of as philosophers. Leonardo da Vinci is considered a scientist and an artist, but he is not a philosopher, not a thinker. Caesar and Alexander are considered actors, especially conquers and leaders. However, they all have a place of classical thinking. When I read the biography of Da Vinci, I remembered the way Steve Jobs worked. Jobs considers the intersection of technology and art as the birthplace of creativity. It is clear that Da Vinci came from a similar place. It is no coincidence that the two great thinkers, the two innovators driving all humanity into work, found their inspiration in the same place. This is a resonance for me as I see the truth of this understanding every day in Myplanet. Another modern change leader who changed the flow of modern technology is Jobs. As a creative thinker, Jobs met his high-tech opponent Steve Wozniak in high school. With the passion for Wozniak's electronics and pursuit of Job's constant innovation, the two companies revolutionize personal computing and can open the stage of future generations of Apple computers. As a leader of change, Jobs ignited his trust in his leadership through a series of initiatives aimed at achieving success. His relentless vision of bringing personal computing to all through miniaturization and innovative applications has led to the launch of unique and powerful personal computing devices such as iMac and iPod.

Evolution and creation in today's school One of the biggest controversies in today's school is the debate between evolution and creationism, which should be taught in American science classes. Many Christians believe that creationism should be given equal time at school, but other Christians believe that the teaching of creationism is to teach religion. Those who strive for equal time say that creationism can be taught without all religious terms. There are still many people who believe that evolution is a belief system like creationism (creation versus creation Evolution theory and evolution theory explain the fact. Creationism is a myth that explains the facts. Evolutionism is proved by facts, creationism is a story about facts. It is always interesting to learn about science and religion, but it is interesting to understand that science produces facts and that all creationists (religions) can be discussed through evolution theory. Therefore evolutionists provided evidence and creationists tried many other thinkers who used scientific theories empirically inferred to challenge Galileo, Copernicus, Bacon, Descartes, and the Biblical hypothesis I will try to. . The Catholic Church called this ideology of creationism as heresy and thus has a bad habit of suppressing complete disarray of the Bible to some extent. For centuries the scientific research has evolved into the theory of big bang and evolution, although it is mainly such a place. Theology means to believe that God uses the evolutionary process of nature to create species. The mainstream Catholic and Protestant theology accepts compatibility between evolution and creationism. When thinking about how to understand creationism theory theorist thinks seriously about making science mainstream 66 Under the broad definition of creationism theoretical evolution supports faith in creationism It is creationism as it contains. But if we adopt a narrow definition that Genesis needs to believe in the mysterious activities of God in natural history and criticism of evolution theory, then most of the variants of theological evolution are not creationism. Creationism is not the same classroom, but has a place in the classroom and evolution. Creationism belongs to theological or religious history. Because sacredness believes in the creation of the world by the Bible. The Bible means that the Bible is confined to groups of religion. The so-called "creative science" is not science at all. Recently it is more like a political movement than the scientific movement. Of course, creationists may have institutions like "creation laboratory" (a church without any scientific research) or "creative research society" (another church without scientific research) , After all it is not truncated in creation. Broken schedule Recently, many science teachers at public schools tried to educate evolution by teaching so-called "smart design theory" (Washington State).

Journal Information Description: The current issue is posted on the Chicago Journals website. Read the latest issue Since its founding in 1912 Isis has featured academic papers, research notes, and reviews of the history of science, medicine and technology and its cultural influence. It also includes comments and book reviews of new publications in the field. This is the official publication of the history of scientific history, the oldest (and most widely used) English journal in this field. The new editorial department and the editorial department were established in the Netherlands and the media wishes to thank the following supporters: Ammodo Foundation; Utrecht University Descartes Center; University of Utrecht Humanities; Huygens Dutch History Institute; Museum Boerhaave Dutch National Science History Medical Museum Isis's subscription is consistent with historical members of scientific history. All individuals and student subscribers are automatically registered as HSS members and receive all relevant offers. "Mobile Wall" represents the period between the latest issue available in JSTOR and the latest journal. The moving wall is usually expressed in terms of age. In rare cases, since the issuer selected the "zero" mobile wall, the current problem will be made public on JSTOR as soon as it is issued. For example, if the current year is 2008 and the journal has a 5 year moving frame, you can get the 2002 article. Authors can submit manuscripts for peer review, place Orvium Tokens (ORVs) that reviewers can redeem, and secure incentive models to guide peer review. As soon as the review is completed, the manuscript will be published so that valuable new knowledge will be available rather than being delayed Peer review is an evaluation system in which academic researchers (articles, papers, grant applications, etc.) are judged by researchers in the same academic field. Peer review has played an important role in academic publishing over the past few decades, and most magazines use it for quality control. In the journal, in general, the main purpose of peer review is to judge the feasibility, importance, novelty, etc. of research results with the help of peer researchers, and based on this, the editor can publish the paper Decide whether to accept or not. Peer review, known as a referee in several academic fields, is an academic process used to publish manuscripts and reward research funds. Publishers and agencies use peer review to select posts and filter. At the same time, the process helps authors meet the standards of their field. Unrefereed publications and prizes can be suspected by scholars and experts in many fields. If the article is long enough to contain several paragraphs, the first paragraph is short and important, and you should explain clearly what the topic on the page is. The next paragraph should summarize the article. They should outline the main points of the article and, if any, summarize the main reasons the topic is interesting or noteworthy, including more important controversies.

John Rock's Human Understanding Papers In John Rock's "Papers on Human Understanding" he distinguishes between the various ideas that we can think of as object perception. Locke divides these concepts into primary and secondary quality. No matter what criticism is necessary for this distinction, perceptions will happen by chance. To illustrate this we need to examine the definition of Locke's primary and secondary quality. The paper on human understanding of John Rock (1690) is another basic text of enlightenment. The main cause of its impact is the epistemological rigor that it shows, at least implicit anti-metaphysical. In this work, Rock is responsible for examining human understanding to determine the limits of human knowledge; he therefore established a prominent model of enlightenment epistemology. Rock found the source of all our thoughts, and the thoughts that compose human knowledge in senses and discussions influenced rationalism theory of natural thought. Locke's lyrics had a major impact on France's enlightenment, mainly through the acceptance and rapid evolution of the philosopher AbbédeCondillac. In "Sensory Theory" (1754), Kandiak is trying to explain how all human knowledge is generated from sensory experiences. John Rock's Human Understanding Papers In John Rock's "Papers on Human Understanding" he distinguishes between the various ideas that we can think of as object perception. Locke divides these concepts into primary and secondary quality. No matter what criticism is necessary for this distinction, perceptions will happen by chance. - Both John Rock and Thomas Hobbes believe that men are essentially equal, but their personal view on equality suggests a fundamentally different approach to proper citizenship I guided you to do. Locke believes that the correct form of civilian government should pay attention to the common interests of people and protect citizens' rights to life, health, freedom, and personal property. John Rock's "Papers on Human Understanding" (1690) is often quoted as a literature underlying the view of "a blank state". Rock criticized that Rene Descartes claimed that God has a universal gift for humanity. Rock's view was severely criticized for his own era. The third Earl of Shaftesbury, Anthony Ashley Cooper, complained that Locke refused the possibility of a congenital idea of ​​"abandoning all the orders and virtues except the world", and led the moral relativism lock Is not a mainstream view of the 19th century, but on the contrary it tends to focus on 'instinct'. According to Leda Cosmides and John Tooby, William James (1842-1910) believes that human instincts are more than animals and the expansion of freedom of movement is the result of more psychological instincts.

There is no doubt that America's evacuation centers are overcrowded, wild cats are strolling in our city, and thousands of dogs live in a grotesque environment of puppies factories nationwide American citizens are easy to investigate. Present your cats and dogs like "family". Companion animals in this country are mostly unstable, among scientists who agree with Descartes 'anima ex machina' (a living example of a ruthless biological process, a nonexistent state), most people envy a pet The way to look after is a more common phenomenon. We are all affected by the excess population of animals. I wandered millions of dollars of money annually and I am abandoned and spending on caring for unpopular pets. Expansion of diseases (including rabies), animal bites and the risk of attacks threaten human health. When a pet walks around to look for food, the facility is damaged and animals may be killed. Animal feces has been proven to be a serious environmental hazard, a contaminated site and a park. Only when all of us are responsible for pet overpopulation, we can see a reduction in the problem. Overpopulation is the largest cause of so many animals in animal protection facilities. The surplus of these poor animals will have even greater impact. Shelters are enthusiastic about removing animals that can not make places for new animals, and are often given to families who are not suitable for animals. Abusers often have opportunities to recruit as evacuation centers are very enthusiastic to get rid of so many overcrowded facilities. In an article by PETA (Animal Ethics Therapist), they showed what happens when evacuation centers are overcrowded. "When numbers become a priority, animals are no longer deemed to be considered and respected, they are moved as an inventory, leading to evacuation or abandonment as a basic safeguard There is no simple solution to the complex problem of animal overpopulation. Shelter is a temporary solution for the foreseeable future. Wild animals, especially cats, are often insulted and may enter evacuation centers with obvious neglect and abuse history. They are part of the most vulnerable animals in our community, but despite many of them, they are still unseen and unpopular to society. Veterinarians should try to make sure that these weak groups of animals can receive compassionate, humanitarian and quality medical care in their lives and achieve the dignity of their death is. Understanding the complexity of the management of animal care facilities and the urgent need to properly educate and train all staff in contact with animals is essential to ensure the health of protected animals.

Three contradictory views on abortion Pregnancy abortion has been a problem of intense debate in the United States over the years. Legislation stipulates that abortion in the fetus or fetus' gestation period is legal. Some people agree with the law and I think they are professional choices. Others are completely opposed to abortion and abortion. In addition to these two groups, there is another group to support abortion in the first half of pregnancy, but I think abortion should be banned in the second half. Opinion Today, abortion is one of the most controversial discussions about women in the United States. Because abortion has been told for years because it should not be legal. Many people against abortion do not even know what abortion is, or why women choose abortion. This research thesis will discuss why women should choose abortion and try to discuss many reasons for choosing abortion. Since then, people are beginning abortion Three contradictory views on abortion Pregnancy abortion has been a problem of intense debate in the United States over the years. Legislation stipulates that abortion in the fetus or fetus' gestation period is legal. Some people agree with the law and I think they are professional choices. Others are completely opposed to abortion and abortion. - As Descartes said, the mind and body are the foundation of our existence, and many different cultures treat different diseases aggressively or negatively. Some cultures like Miao believe that epilepsy is a good spiritual thing but other things like such western culture think that it is medically bad as it can lead to death . Many diseases can be seen as negative and positive, and even more than others. However, the disease mostly considered negative is depression. Abortion is one of the most controversial issues in today's discussion and can be easily classified into two different perspectives: one that supports abortion and one that opposes abortion. Pro Life and Pro Choice have the opposite view, everything from homicide to moral, value to violence is a problem. In two articles on abortion, "abortion is a selfish choice." "Abortion is not a selfish choice." Each party discusses their position and keeps their position. The first article, "Abortion is a selfish choice", admits that those choosing abortion can act for their own benefit, but disagrees with the article that abortion is not a selfish choice " I decided to give birth to a woman. Both of these points provide a reason to question the view that people hold strongly.

In the second chapter of Anselm 's Proslogian, Anselm later offered something described as his ontological argument. This believes that he is very powerful Psalm 14: 1 "Fool" He his heart, "No God". Anselm's assertions are as follows: God is "unimaginable" If someone understands something, this means that in someone's understanding, "bigger ones can not be imagined" If someone understands, "Someone can imagine without big things" exists in someone's understanding. In Anselm 's ontological argument, he is trying to prove the existence of God, but his argument is purely based on a discussion of thought and does not require a moral entity to challenge the truth of emotion. Ontology is related to existence or something. Anselm 's ontological debate is considered to be omnipotent and kind, regarded as existence and whether it is God's wealth, and omnipotent. This argument is a transcendental argument. Instead of relying on experimental knowledge to prove the existence of God it means that God must exist logically or that the absence of God is illogical. Ontology argument is a transcendental argument. These arguments are trying to prove the existence of God from the meaning of the word God. Anselm of Canterbury introduced an ontological argument to his work "Proslogion". The classic argument of Anselm is based on two principles, the most important of which are the aforementioned St. Ansell and René Descartes of Cantabelli. If he does not exist, you can still think of a big existence (it is like saying that God does not exist except this existence). The presence must still be one of the attributes of God, as it can still understand the larger God (God that exists) by removing it. The most common problem of this discussion is that it only enumerates its existence in God's attributes, not it. This argument seems to indicate that the facts that can be imagined should be true. Antism 's ontological argument is intended to be the first testimony of the existence of God. Anselm starts with the premise that it does not rely on experience and draws the conclusion of the existence of God in a purely logical way. His purpose was to refute the fool who said in God that there is no God (Psalm 14: 1). This fool has two important features. The following is an attempt to clarify the discussion presented in Chapter 2 of Proslogium. The discussion in Chapter 3 is quite different and is more interesting in some ways. After completing this page, you may try to give a similar gloss with the second parameter. This is not easy. This argument is very complicated. But you may do this in a useful campaign

Artificial Intelligence As computer technology evolved rapidly and software developers began to sell their products convincingly as artificial intelligence, the inevitable problems began to have some urgency. I really think. This form and other forms are very old questions that can be traced back to philosophers such as Plato, Aristotle, Descartes. First, there are two types of artificial intelligence. It is a computer that can execute artificial intelligence, every human ability. This is in contrast to artificial narrow intelligence that a computer with artificial intelligence can do with human but can do only in a narrow range. - Steven Mnuchin Strategy finance minister Ben Thompson recently laughed at many Twitter posts as lack of understanding about AI was lacking. He said he does not care about artificial intelligence automation, but autonomous vehicles will move from the coast to the coast in the near future. But first, what is artificial intelligence? Artificial intelligence is not a single technology that can be easily defined as human recognition intelligence. In contrast, artificial intelligence is a well-known set of related technologies such as speech recognition, machine learning, decision management, and even biometrics. The combination of these innovations drives the state-of-the-art technology of today. Online animation customer services found on Tinder and other dating sites, computer maintenance analysis, even interpersonal algorithms are not surprisingly involved in changing the face of the financial industry. Artificial intelligence is created by scientists and programmers all over the world. The main scientific research centers in the field of artificial intelligence are Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) (USA), Machine Intelligence Research Institute (USA), German Artificial Intelligence Center (Germany), National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST) Japan is. , Russian Academy of Sciences (Russia). Various technical communities are also interested in developing artificial intelligence. They created a new technology and platform, including cryptographic currency. They have created a new technical environment that will be used by artificial intelligence. Distributed networks are required for AI. Artificial intelligence studies block chains, bit coins, Ethereum, IOTA, ripple, dash, light coins. AI chooses the best

Because of their self-transcendence, humans are continually improving themselves. The purpose of this process is to achieve an immortal soul. According to Plato, in order to achieve this goal, an individual must first participate in his educational theory: the cave fable, then the metaphor of the parting line, and then the use of formal theory. To fully immerse in this process, you need to understand the allegory of Plato's cave. Moses Mendelssohn's Phaedon is a simple and immortal soul defense. This is a series of three dialogues that Socrates insists on the immortality of the soul and rethinks the platonic dildo paedo preparing for his own death. Many philosophers including Protino, Descartes, Leibniz believe that soul is simple. It is because we can not break simplicity. In Phaedon, Mendelssohn solved the gap in the early version of this discussion (Kant is called the Achilles tendon of rationalist psychology). Phaedon contains a primitive argument about the simplicity of the soul, and it is also a primitive argument that can also not suddenly disappear. It includes a further original argument that the soul must maintain its reasonable ability as long as it exists Therefore, even if it is especially Homer, the first one is the greatest poet and the poet is not good for the immortal human soul and must be defeated. Like an ashes of immortality. ) But in the last satire, Socrates talked about the posthumous world, and a new myth about the rewards and punishments waiting for us - a poetic story about the soul beyond the journey of death . Heritage I already know it in a conversation. Homer seems to be unable to be expelled after all. Socrates proves the immortality of the soul by asserting that the absolute form does not co-exist with their opponents: the soul gives life and the opposite of life is death, so the soul does not recognize death, and Therefore it is immortal. The soul is immortal, but it must be looked after in life and forever - the only thing escaping from evil is getting better and better. "Everyone who lived in purity and clarity is enjoying guidance with God's colleagues." Socrates explained his theory of the earth. If the earth is spherical it is in the middle of the sky (ether) and there is no need to ensure that the earth does not fall off when it is suspended in equilibrium. It's huge, plenty of empty places, water, fog, and air are gathered. Although ordinary people actually live, we mistakenly believe that we live on the surface.

In order to understand the politics we have, we have to see two philosophers who formed the idea and politics of the world. Niccolò Machiavelli and Thomas Hobbes have created a new political science against classical political views. Both believe that both the classical philosophy and Christianity are focused on reaching the imaginary Republic, but these fictive republics can not be reached. Under these fictive republics, men must maintain high standards and men must be noble; men can not maintain all virtues as men live in a world where not everything is good. . Thomas Hobbes and John Bramhall were contemporaries of Descartes who lived in Europe during the British Civil War. They discussed freedom and necessity around 1650. Hobbes believes that freedom has no external obstacles to behavior, because the voluntary actions of "free will" are necessary before and therefore have been determined. He regards the need as an order of God. Bramholk believes that freedom is prescribed freedom that can not be avoided, but I believe it is consistent with the foresight of God's foresight. Both are compatible, Hobbes' freedom and causal determinism are compatible with Branholm's religious determinism Freedom is consistent with necessity. Freedom and freedom are the same: As in the water, this is not only the freedom but also the necessity of descending through the waterways; the same can be said of the spontaneous behavior of men. Every action of man, every desire, every act is due to some reason, due to another reason, for another reason it is in a continuous chain, so the first link is God. Hand is necessary, it is the first one for all reasons. That's why he can do it. February 5: Robespierre tells the Convention on the Necessity of Terror as follows. April 10: All members of Luxembourg conspiracy members Danton and Hébert, as well as various other supporters, have been tried. Seven of them were found innocent and 19 people were sentenced to death, including Arthur Dillon who fought in the American Revolutionary War, including Lucille Des Moulin, a widow of Camille Des Moulin. , Pierre Gaspard Chamemet, the heritage of Jacques Herbert Fran Francis Herbert, and the dissected bishop GOBEL

Introduction Through analysis of Hagenmas' research, the following argument is intended to provide an understanding of his argument about the theory of crisis tendency. Jorgen states that the concept of traditional Marxist crisis trends is outdated and no longer relevant in capitalist society (Heath, J, 2011). Jürgen Habermas has studied obstacles to the development of contemporary Western society. I believe that he is caused by the tension of the crisis. In this paper, I analyzed the problem of legitimacy faced by contemporary countries, using concepts derived from his research. (1) The dominant position of modern science in modern bureaucratic organizations and cultures, emphasizing that experimental experimentation is the basis of all effective knowledge and hence positivism. This led to a long-term legalization crisis in academic philosophy: How do Plato, Descartes, Hume and Nietzsche win the support of natural scientists? (2) This is in parallel with philosophical bureaucracy in large academic institutions, which can be either private funds, American, or public funds such as Canada. In both cases, universities and universities are being forced to study and teach things from an economic point of view. This is a paper by JF Lyotard on the present situation of postmoderns in the university, and more and more research will be expected as "performance". The crisis of humanity - the crisis of legalization, the crisis of public reasons - has become a crisis of the whole higher education now in the 20th decade of the 2000s and faces the structural crisis of the national fund . For public universities, the outlook is dark: the National Fund is depleted and there is no prospect of replenishment. California tuition fee increased by 32% in 2009. In 2010, SUNY-Albany closed French, Italian, Russian, classical and drama courses. And it gained the attention of the new world order from the coast to the coast. However, each state hides a deeper problem. These funds are not enough to complete the task from the beginning, but we miss when leaving these funds - and that quarter will not try Keynesianism again. Trump elections caused a primary legalization crisis, and most Americans opposed to him had two reliable political assembly points: the Sanders movement and former president and his small circle. Our hopes and energy should be invested in the first one, but it is foolish to underestimate the second one. Mr. Obama did not succeed because Hillary fell to hell. As the only world class politician who left for the United States, he will become stronger, especially because his presidential election has become nostalgic. (Most people forget to forget that they banished 2.5 million immigrants while forgiving Wall Street, starting with the 2010 Democratic defeat, with the president's signature.

John Locke's "Papers on Human Understanding" (1690) was first criticized by philosophers and theologians, John Norris of Bemerton, "rough reflections on human understanding and human understanding". That paper is attached to his Christian. Blessings and words about the gospel (1690). Criticism of Norris against Loris caused three replies, but it was only released after death. Historically, Locke has been regarded as the winner of this discussion, but there is new evidence that Norris's argument to the knowledge base of conscious recognition, ie, this paper advocates effective and valuable criticism It will appear. Locke, in fact, British, John Rock. John Rock had a philosophical influence on both political theory and theoretical philosophy, and this influence was reflected in the concept of the period between 1789 and 1914 and the concept of human rights equality. John Locke's work has influenced the work of multiple diplomats on freedom and social contract between the society and the government. Rock 's human and power ideology is the foundation of the concept of power separation. As an enlightening thinker, John Locke wrote two articles. John Rock and John Stuart Mill's Freedom Definition John Rock thinks that humans should have more freedom in political society than John Stuart Mill. John Roc's "Second Paper of Government" and John Stuart Mill's "Freedom of Expression" outlines the conceptual framework of ideal nations of each thinker, but influential and powerful literature It is a work. Two different views on human nature and its freedom are proposed. About how John Locke and John Stuart Mill take different views John Locke John Locke was born in Somerset, England on August 29, 1632, is a British philosopher and political theorist. Rock was educated at the Oxford Christian church, where he followed traditional classical courses and gained a medical degree with a focus on medicine and science studies, but the interest in philosophy was awakened again by Descartes' research It was. Then he joined the family of Anthony Ashley Cooper and later became the Count of Shaftesbury who was a private doctor at first. John Rock (1632-1704) was a British philosopher who played an important role in the creation of modern philosophical empathism and political liberalism. Rock proposes the concept of individual rights and social contracts - the concept of government rights and responsibilities is an influential figure of the Enlightenment and the American Revolution. After the civil war ended in 1646, Rock was sent to Westminster School in London at the age of 14. He was a competent student and was chosen as the king's scholar for his academic record - a form of scholarship. But he did not particularly like the time to go to school; later he criticized public schools to emphasize corporate punishment and dry, narrow academic views, the brochure "Thoughts on Education" (1693) wrote. Locke believes that education should not only promote learning of books but also promote good moral and rational development.

Magnetic summary of gentleness and moral realism: The moral anticlimists believe that the words "good" and "bad", "correct" and "wrong" mean that attributes and possibly possessed by objects and behaviors I do not think that it means. They believe that if a person calls pain or other events "bad" and adultery or other "wrong" acts, they will not report certain facts about that object or action. To some extent, J. L. Mackie defends moral anti - realism by appealing to the ontological strangeness that he believes in the existence of a value attribute. Non-moral impolarists apparently refuse moral realism, but for the same reason not everyone is doing it, there are several kinds of moral impolitism . The most positive rejection of moral realism is J. L. It may be the moral error theory defended by Mackie. He thinks all moral assertions are strictly wrong. Because they assume that attributes (eg tenderness, error, fairness) are 'ontologically strange' and that we can perceive through the means of normal experience. The characteristics are completely different. . Since there is no specific teacher to detect these characteristics, there is no real evidence to prove their existence, so we should conclude that they do not exist. Quasi-realism is a non-cognitive and expressionist meta ethical and epistemological theory developed by Professor Simon Blackburn. The proposition is beyond the psychological state, but we believe that they have many realistic features, such as changes that can only change slowly, or changes that can respond to natural attributes. Randism is an individualism movement established by Ian Rand and is called objectivism by its followers. A rationalist theory or method based on the argument that the reason of human beings can in principle be the source of all knowledge. In modern times, rationalism was first proposed by Rene Descartes and spread from the 17th century to the 18th century mainly on the European continent. Oppose empiricism

Data is gathered to analyze how to use the question strategy throughout the class environment and how these strategies can improve students' understanding of conic curves. This lesson is a videotape recorded on the 2 day school day. In the second survey, part of video recording on the first day showed the interaction between the student and the teacher. This was the first analysis of the data. In this part, the teacher instructs the students to find circle equations. The conical part is the curve created by the intersection of the cone and the plane. There are mainly three types of conic curves. It is an ellipse (including a circle), a parabola, and a hyperbolic curve. The cone section was discovered by Menaechmus (380 BC - 320 BC) and since processing of conic curves is equivalent to processing each equation, they are cubic equations and other higher order equations and geometries Equally. . Menaechmus knows that the equation y 2 = l x holds for a parabola. Here l is a constant called the rectal rectum but I do not notice that neither of the two unknowns decide the curve. He obviously also had these properties of conic and other curves. Using this information, we can solve the cube iteration problem by solving the point where the two parabolas intersect. The cone section is the intersection of the cone with the equation and the plane. In other words, in space, all cones are defined as plane equations and are defined as solution sets of the previously given conic equations. With this formalization, we can determine the position and nature of the conic focal point. With equations you can call many mathematics to solve geometric problems. When a number is converted to an equation, the Cartesian coordinate system converts geometric problems into analytic problems and is therefore called name resolution geometry. This view, as outlined by Descartes, enriches and changes the types of geometry figured out by ancient Greek mathematicians. Cubic equations are solved geometrically by determining the intersection of the conical parts. Archimedes' problem of dividing a sphere into two sections at a defined ratio is first represented by Al Mahani as a cubic equation and the first solution is given by Abu Gafar al Hazin. The determination of a regular heptagon that can be scored or defined on a given circle is a more complicated equation. This is the first successful solution for Abul Gud.

Educational philosophy - seeking knowledge Ray Wilber once said that "the possibilities for any child are the most interesting and exciting." This simple citation is very ambitious for every educator, especially myself. For me, whenever I enter the room, children will give me a smile, so becoming a teacher is to know the greatest happiness. In addition to love, education is the best gift you can offer your child, and teaching can bring immeasurable knowledge to you in their growing mind. According to my knowledge, the phrase "philosophy" is the study and understanding of knowledge related to the study of the wisdom of the universe. The term "education" is an act of developed knowledge. To sum up the word "educational philosophy", it has a very deep meaning in the context of knowledge. Therefore, before I state my position on this issue accurately, I must use knowledge to find past, present and future experiences. - Lost works of educational philosophy are mainly cited as a phased process that is in the early stages and will never end. There will always be something people have not learned. Knowledge is a powerful tool. Christa McAuliffe, one of the most famous educators of the twentieth century, said before her unhappy death. "I educate the future, I will educate." As an educator, you will try to influence all your students. What is the philosophy of education and education? How to teach and master knowledge is how it is defined, taught, and learned. Education is what you receive at school. My education begins with birth, a journey that has already begun when you experience the new things you learned and grow psychologically and emotionally. - My life, my fantasies, my philosophy - Descartes' fourth meditation, allegory of Plato's cave, Francis Bacon's four idols, and Walt Disney's daily discovery process About myself: I am a hypocrite and I live in the world of hypocrites on this planet.

Existentialists believe that individual existence is silly unless he adds meaning through his actions. In the novel "Strangers" and "Transformation", writers Albert Camus and Franz Kafka tell their stories from different angles. Through viewpoint, the writer shows their character, Mersault and Gregor, which convey the concept of credibility of ontology, alienation. When a person lives according to his own definition, he becomes a reality. Both coronation and Kafka use our own perspective to shape their roles. As a cultural movement, existentialism belongs to the past. As a philosophical quest, it introduces a new norm for understanding what man meant, authenticity, ie the norm related to Descartes' unique concept, ie self-practice, manifestation, existence in the world. Doctrine continues to play an important role in contemporary thinking in the continent and its analytic tradition. Association dedicated to the Phenomenological Existential Philosophical Association, as well as Heidegger, Sartre, Merlot-Ponti, Jasper, Beauvoir and other existential philosophers provides a forum for ongoing research - history, academic Nature, and more systematic concerns - derived from classicalism's existentialism, often faced with recent moves such as structuralism, decomposition, interpretation, feminism. Matthew Ratcliffe (2008) developed an existential psychopathological approach Those methods have been discussed in detail; they focus on the human experience under the umbrella called the presence - humanist approach and the actual therapeutic relationship. Existentialism and human-centered theory are consistent with my firm belief in the positive nature of everyone. After examining these two theories in detail, I would like to integrate these two theories and integrate them into my own core theory without weakening the theoretical commitment. In my opinion, existentialism and people-centered views have similar views and when they are in crisis or present public opinion, they rely on customer experience therapy (Van, 2002). They have a potential assumption that customers can trust and have a consistent choice to live a meaningful life freely. Together they emphasize the quality relationship between the client and the counselor and the technology does not play a role in the treatment environment (Corey, 2013)

So he gave birth to a normal baby. How will baby thinking become one of the greatest political philosophers in the world? From his reaction to the growth of his father's Puritan to "the rationality of Christianity" John Rock announced five years ago of his death, John Rock 's life is to make God pursue the ultimate truth I will show you how to use souls to focus on integrity to. On August 9, 1632, he was born in the village of Somerset Wrington. His father was a lawyer in the village, a small landowner who participated in the British civil war on the Puritans side. British, John Rock. John Rock has a philosophical influence on both political theory and theoretical philosophy, and this influence was reflected in the concept of the period between 1789 and 1914 and the concept of human rights equality. John Locke's work has influenced the work of multiple diplomats on freedom and social contract between the society and the government. Rock 's human and power ideology is the foundation of the concept of power separation. As an enlightening thinker, John Locke wrote two articles. John Rock and John Stuart Mill's Freedom Definition John Rock thinks that humans should have more freedom in political society than John Stuart Mir. John Roc's "Second Paper of Government" and John Stuart Mill's "Freedom of Expression" outlines the conceptual framework of ideal nations of each thinker, but influential and powerful literature It is a work. Two different views on human nature and its freedom are proposed. About how John Locke and John Stuart Mill take different views John · Rock John · Rock was born in Somerset in England on August 29, 1632, is a British philosopher and political theorist. Rock was educated at the Oxford Christian church, where he followed a traditional classical course and looked at medicine and science studies and gained a medical degree, but his interest in philosophy was again revealed by Descartes' research I woke up. Then he joined the family of Anthony Ashley Cooper and later became the Count of Shaftesbury who was a private doctor at first.

Creation and evolution "Creation and evolution" What is wrong with this title? Please read this several times and answer this question. We have all heard of this argument. The idea of ​​Genesis, the idea that God created all the seeds emerging today, and the evolutionary theory, the evolution of all life from simple bacteria to all species emerging today, is a well-known argument. Since the first publication of "evolution" in Darwin's controversial book "Origin of Species" published in 1859, discussion between religion and science existed. They want to argue that the problem of evolution (or what they call "evolution theory" or "Darwinism") and science is not religion but religion and religion (science). "The example comes from the lie of Ken Ham: evolution, but it is called" the cause, principle or system of faith related to enthusiasm and belief "(from Webster Quoted) as well as a deep misunderstanding evolution of two religions) dictionary. Humm's ridiculous argument differs from "contradiction-free biblical evidence", in the past can only study them and can not access directly, so deriving scientific conclusions from fossils and evidence is That means you can not. Written in the era of Kenam Creation and Evolution "Creation and Evolution" Please read this question a couple of times to see what's wrong with this title. We have all heard of this argument. The idea of ​​Genesis, the idea that God created all the seeds emerging today, and the evolutionary theory, the evolution of all life from simple bacteria to all species emerging today, is a well-known argument. Since Darwin first published "evolution" with his 1859 controversial book "Origin", he published his book "The Origin of Natural Selection Seed" and proposed evolution. This book and other books have begun discussion for many years between evolutionist and creationist. Are we created by supernatural supernatural existence, or is coincidence that our creation is occurring? Let's start with two inconsistent theories. The general usage of the word "evolution" is that our world creatures exist through a natural process without guides. Evolution theory and evolution theory explain the fact. Creationism is a myth that explains the facts. Evolutionism is proved by facts, creationism is a story about facts. It is always interesting to learn about science and religion, but it is interesting to understand that science produces facts and that all creationists (religions) can be discussed through evolution theory. Therefore evolutionists provided evidence and creationists tried many other thinkers who used scientific theories empirically inferred to challenge Galileo, Copernicus, Bacon, Descartes, and the Biblical hypothesis I will try to. . The Catholic Church called this ideology of creationism as heresy and thus has a bad habit of suppressing complete disarray of the Bible to some extent. For centuries the scientific research has evolved into the theory of big bang and evolution, although it is mainly such a place.

The phrase "philosophy" is derived from the two roots of "philosophy" and "Sophia." Philo means love, Sofia means wisdom. Therefore, philosophy means love for wisdom. In fact, philosophy requires investigation, pursuit and quest of wisdom. Many great philosophers call philosophy an art of thought. Other people simply define it as a systematic study of human emotions and thoughts. It is worth noting that many fields that have been philosophical so far have been separated into independent fields. Ancient Western philosophy is generally divided into three periods. Initially, all the thoughters before Socrates were called PreSocratics, the second period covered the life of Socrates, Plato and Aristotle, and the last period encompassed various developments of philosophy including Stow. Ge School, Epicurean School, Skeptics, Neopra Tonics, Aristotle School. The end of ancient philosophy meant that Christianity had spread in the sixth century, but Socrates before the Greek philosopher was called the former Socratic philosopher or the former Socratic philosopher. They were the first Western philosophers to become active in the 5th and 6th centuries BC. In ancient Greece. These philosophers are able to consistently and comprehensively describe all the natural phenomena and events in human life without resorting to myths of the original principle (arkhöh; ἀρχή; origin or Try to discover the starting point). The phrase "modern philosophy" is a philosophical terminology that refers to a specific period in the history of Western philosophy (ie the philosophy of the 20th century and the 21st century). However, this expression is often compared with modern philosophy (pointing to the early stages of Western philosophy), post modern philosophy (which refers to the criticism of continental philosophers against modern philosophy), and non - technical use of phrases. Recent philosophical work The modern age was a very innovative era in Western philosophy. New spiritual and material theory, new concept of God, new political philosophy, and civil society theory are proposed. This period was from the end of the 15th century to the end of the 18th century (about 1500-1800). Books published by philosophers such as Descartes, Rock, Hume, Spinoza, Leibniz, and Kant will form an understanding of our modern philosophy. The early modern philosophical roots can be traced back to the 1200s - maturity and speculation of academic tradition. The philosophy of Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274), Occam (1288-1348) and Brydan (1300-1358) emphasizes the ability of human rationality. With such abilities, we can fully understand secular and sacred things.

The opinion on the second question is quite different. The laws that Platon and Aristotle, the two most influential ancient Greek writers, went there do not have any exceptions. But if one adopts the Bible's view, God can not only enact the Law but also pray to attract people to make exceptions - to cure the late stage illness and to bring drought ahead of time Finished, the Olympic campaign regained it. Contrary to Descartes' viewpoint, almost all Christian thinkers believe that God must be able to interrupt the law in order to achieve miracles. Natural law, natural law There is a natural law that supports the contents of law. We can build this through science, philosophy, and theology. It is not affected by the whim of capital fantasy, and if it is infringed by the government, free men may legally rebel to restore good governance. Because it is the foundation of tyranny, the government can not simply legislate to achieve what it wants to exist. Presence of permanent and elite institutions (such as the House of Representatives and the Senate) as a trial of enthusiasm for democracy at the decentralizing lower house. These remains will be sitting for a long time, preferably consisting of very rich or powerful people who are not interested in being bought. They are looking at long term. They are not "experts", experts are just men, it is easy to purchase. In other words, he is a democratic politician. John Locke, in particular in two government papers, incorporates the laws of nature in his many theories and philosophies. Although the effect of lock understanding is usually based on Hobbes' contract theory, there is a much more similar discussion as to whether his concept of natural law is more similar to Aquinas (filtered by Richard Hook) or Hobbes is there. The theory of people who fix Hobbes. . Mr. Rock stated that if the ruler could not defend "life, freedom, property" by breaking the natural law, thinking that as a matter of course, it could overthrow the existing state and create a new state , Hobbes' provision. Some people think this is a false problem. They say that the political philosophy of rock is not entirely based on natural law but based on natural rights like Thomas Hobbes' philosophy. This may be the biggest controversy in today's rock interpretation. Natural law theory thinks that humans are bound by moral law. Morals are fundamentally responsible, and everyone must abide by the responsibilities of natural law. Thomas Hobbes devised a new approach His morality is not in the workplace, but at the right time, everyone has the right to protect themselves and pursue their own interests. I want to do

These moral principles are "beneficial", "autonomy", "justice", "indiscriminate", "loyalty", and "authenticity". We will examine how each ethical principle influences the behavior and behavior of practitioners in the healing process. Advantage: This ethical principle simply shows good things, acts aggressively and, if possible, prevents customer harm. It reflects the consultant's responsibility to contribute to the client's welfare. Why does the counselor have to comply with this code? Application of Ethical and Legal Principles in Patient Education Considering the ethical and legal liability inherent in the patient education process, the six main ethical principles are complicatedly summarized through the ANA Code of Ethics (2001) and the AHA Patient Act It is done. . Rights (1992), and similar documents published by other medical institutions, and the first autonomy of these principles of federal autonomy are derived from Greek auto (self) and nomos (law), self rights It refers to. Decision (Tong, 2007). Legislation has been enacted to protect the right to make patient independent choices. Federal government tasks such as informed consent must be evident in each federal funding application to support biomedical research. Local IRBPHS will assume the responsibilities of judges and jurors to ensure compliance with this enforceable regulation (Dickey, 2006). In the sixth phase (driven by the universal moral principle), moral reasoning is based on abstract reasoning using universal ethical principles. The law is effective only on the basis of justice, and the commitment to justice is obliged to violate the unfair law. Since social contracts are not essential for moral and ethical behavior, legal rights are not necessary. Decisions are not made conditionally, but rather on absolute terms like Immanuel Kant's philosophy. This includes personal imagination about what they do with other people's shoes if they believe that others are imagining it is genuine. The resulting consensus is the action taken. In this way, actions themselves are not instruments, they are eternal purpose, personal behavior is correct, not to avoid punishment in the best interests, expectations, legal or prior agreements. Judgmental behavior includes six moral / moral disciplines, including gold, rules, taxonomy of Emmanuel Kant, principle of utilitarianism, principle of risk aversion, principle of change of Descartes, and moral "free lunch" There are moral principles. These principles should be used in conjunction with ethical analysis.

Rational expression as a form of knowledge builds meaning by modifying and proving ideas and beliefs based on new or existing information. The term logic derived from the use of valid information is synonymous with reason and is considered a division of reasoning. The reason is a way of thinking, and the word logic represents a way in which the inference follows certain rules and standards. When asked for knowledge, coherent reasons and consistency are expected to support and provide the stability of discussion. In the West, thinking about thinking is called "logic" and uses it as a way to understand based on rational principles. This "logic" was born in the term "logistics" of natural science and human science. Today 's logistics is considered to be the only legitimate form or way, as the results and procedures ensure the construction of the technical world. Logistics is an interesting term because its use as a noun means "symbolic logic" (mathematical algebra calculation), which is also related to the behavior of war. Its application in mathematical calculations can be found in a new branch of so-called logical positivism, philosophical branching, which was formerly known as empiricism. The idea of ​​logical positivism is expressed as algebraic calculation. Only the heart that can be calculated can be known and worth knowing. It is called Descartes principle. As I said, this is the value of this new form of reasoning, that is observation or understanding without thought. This is fundamentally an escape from this infinite loop of inaccurate knowledge. Because I saw a circle. It saw something around the circle and it did not fall into it. It saw everything. But what is I saying is true? If you can hear and investigate your experience at this moment, you will find that this is the truth, it must be true. You can not answer this question with your thoughts, logical reasoning. You can not use your own thoughts, which means that you must again enter the circle and go around the circle, and the reality will pass you. You must use your opinion to answer this question, and you will find yourself leaving. This is the purpose of observation - to discover that truth at once and to all people

What is necessary for bacon's philosophy to function in this complex world is an interesting time. We, the people of the United States who lived at the end of the 20th century, are part of the world's most technologically advanced civilizations to date, and today they are part of the world's largest economy. Due to the wealth and power of our country, it attracts immigrants from many other countries. Furthermore, due to advances in communication technology, especially television and the Internet, we are exposed to various lifestyles and experiences all over the world. One of the first philosophers who supported the scientific method was Francis Bacon in England. Most historians believe that French Bacon and Descartes are the founder of modern philosophy. Bacon wrote two influential works "Learning Progress" (1605) and "Inorganic Organs" (1620). He said that knowledge is power, and knowledge can only be obtained through an inductive investigation method. Bacon envisions a new world of cultures and leisure acquired by exploring the laws and processes of nature. In explaining the world, he predicted the impact of scientific, engineering and technological progress. Francis Bacon talks about politics and philosophy at the Gray Inn and gathers frequently to try out various theatrical scenes he admits for writing. The relationship between Bacon and the Rosicrucian and Freemasonry has been widely discussed by authors and scholars in many books. However, other people, including Daphne du Maurier, believe that there is no substantial evidence in her biography Bacon, which supports the assertion on Rose Cross. Frances Yates did not claim that bacon was Rose Cross, but his evidence suggests that he was still involved in some of the more closed intellectual movements at that time. She believes that the bacon's learning and progress moves closely related to the German Rose Cross movement, while Bacon's new Atlantis depicts the land dominated by Rose Cross . He obviously saw movement of his own learning and progress to meet the ideal of Rose Cross. Francis Bacon (1561-1626) was one of the key figures in the field of natural philosophy and scientific methodology from Renaissance to early modern times. As a lawyer, parliamentary and Queen lawyer, Bacon asked questions about law, nation and religion, and modern politics, but he also notes that even his book on nature guesses the sentence he guessed about possible social concepts Announced. Thinking about moral issues in progression work (Prose)).

I am not alone on Charlie's corner bar lonely road. On the way, I went through a party shop where I would find beer and cigarettes that I was instructed to buy. You can wait. As I approached the bar, the roar of the neon beer slogan illuminated the dark window. A couple left the bar and made an impressive laugh through the open door. When I entered the bar, there were lots of furry boxes around the square jukebox, tight dresses, and bleached hair laughing. This is a very strange thing. It may be too strange, that is usually a good sign that I am on the right track. I am creative upside down creative. Lonely egoism, something of Descartes. I am perplexed among the unknown part of the creative imagination, the state of consciousness - the state of unconsciousness. There, all designers, writers, and marketers will find the best idea. I know the person I am selling. It is obvious that the 6 foot high booth, which is an image of a clerk, is struggling to scan someone's head at a grocery store, but this is not our style. There is not enough budget to support it. It also does not match with the brand identity. This is a troublesome idea Only that word echoes in my mind. But loneliness does not pose a threat to me. I am alone. In addition to Alonley, he is home to Ron and plans to die in orderly way. I know that I have never talked to Ashley since Brad's funeral. I picked up the phone from the bedside table and called her. With automatic voice, you can see that her mailbox is full. I will pull it. "Your sister will die, and she will be ugly.First she will blind, then she will be incontinent.They will be immersed in her own dirt.The idea is next She loses control, her emotions and character slide down like a relaxed mask, you do not want to see it at all? " Will I die alone? Yes. It is a joke, but it may not be the case. In the world of justice, you die alone. The ratio of women to men after age 50 is unlikely. It is possible to find ways to remove or slow down relationships, sagging for a long time. Music chair game you want to avoid. What happens when I go to a very young person? I think this will be very interesting. I am self-improvement. Temporary sexual haze pretending to be love. I love young women, but over the past 20 years I have found beautiful things. Let's say that these choices are equal to the lack of imagination about how women evolve and affect your life. Also, I hope your man will fall.

Evolution of natural selection is the result of evolution, organisms can adapt to the current population, but not to perfect organisms (Smock 2014). For the past 200 years, guppies of men have shown more or less colorful patterns to decorate their bodies. In hostile waters, research has shown that the body of male guppy becomes more colorful in predators and areas without more conservative color schemes (Futuyuma 2009). In the 1980 study, once the Guppy was moved to a safer marine area, it was shown that more male male guppies appeared in the next generation (Futuyuma 2009). Evolution theory and evolution theory explain the fact. Creationism is a myth that explains the facts. Evolutionism is proved by facts, creationism is a story about facts. It is always interesting to learn about science and religion, but it is interesting to understand that science produces facts and that all creationists (religions) can be discussed through evolution theory. Therefore evolutionists provided evidence and creationists tried many other thinkers who used scientific theories empirically inferred to challenge Galileo, Copernicus, Bacon, Descartes, and the Biblical hypothesis I will try to. . The Catholic Church called this ideology of creationism as heresy and thus has a bad habit of suppressing complete disarray of the Bible to some extent. For centuries the scientific research has evolved into the theory of big bang and evolution, although it is mainly such a place. They want to argue that the problem of evolution (or what they call "evolution theory" or "Darwinism") and science is not religion but religion and religion (science). "The example comes from the lie of Ken Ham: evolution, but it is called" the cause, principle or system of faith related to enthusiasm and belief "(from Webster Quoted) as well as a deep misunderstanding evolution of two religions) dictionary. Humm's ridiculous argument differs from "contradiction-free biblical evidence", in the past can only study them and can not access directly, so deriving scientific conclusions from fossils and evidence is That means you can not. Written in the era of Kenam

In many areas of psychology, cognitive psychology is "psychological field of study of psychological processes" (Cherry, 2010). In connection with the development and growth of cognitive psychology, many people contribute too many milestones. Behavioral observations are very important in cognitive psychology and die from the abstract nature of cognition The psychological process of cognitive psychology research includes how people think, perceive, remember and learn. The main focus of cognitive psychology is how people collect, process and save information (Cherry, 2010). Show more Gibson In this book, Neisser concludes that cognitive psychology thinks that there is little chance of becoming common until Gibson's "perceived research" is reexamined (Massaro , 1990). A milestone related to cognitive psychology is personal psychology developed by Dr. Alfred Adler. In 1902, Freud asked Adler to help create neuropsychiatric psychotherapy and Alderia psychology had made a big progress. Then in 1912 Adler began to doubt Freud 's theory of Freud' s sexual impulses and how they became a major factor in the formation of normal and neurotic character. Adler allowed Freud to develop his idea, which was the basis for all subsequent cognitive psychology and treatment (Cherry, 2010). Work in George Mandalay and his memory organization is another breakthrough event in cognitive psychology. Mandler was a contributor to the cognitive revolution in the middle of the 20th century. His research has made major progress in the field of "cognition and emotion, the importance of independent feedback" (Kessen. Ortony, & Craik, 1991). Mandler used organizational theory to understand memory, recollection, recognition, and made significant progress in cognitive psychology. Cognitive psychology definition paper 2 cognitive psychology definition paper cognitive psychology test heart. Brain and mind are thought to be two different things. The brain is an organ and the brain is the result of a personal thought process. In this article we will study exactly what cognitive psychology is, milestones in the development of cognitive psychology, and behavior observation in cognitive psychology. Definition of cognitive psychology Cognitive psychology is responsible for examining psychological processes and understanding why individuals do what they are doing. Some of the principles that it examines are personal perception, learning, attention, reasoning, memory, and problem solving. Everyone's recognition is different. Individuals use her or his perception to form judgments and thoughts about her or her environment. Everyone has different learning methods, it affects the way anyone learns Running Head: Definition of Cognitive Psychology 1 Definition of Cognitive Psychology Heather Burgess PSY 360 October 24, 1013 Dr. Matt Pearcey Definition of Cognitive Psychology 2 Definition of Cognitive Psychology Cognitive psychology is about learning, memory, perception And research on the psychological processes of thinking. As an official field of psychology, its roots can go back to Descartes, which tries to explain how thinking works and proposes analogy of "hydraulic system of neural function". 2007, p. 26) He observed a moving image at Saint-Germain-en-Laye. It is not only a constant pursuit of how the mind works, but also a merciless pursuit of the spiritual composition that ultimately constitutes the basis of cognitive theory. It is clear that different approaches are needed when psychologists study how psychological processes produce behavior. It only thinks of what I learned through rewards and punishments.

Nearly all human goals of Plato and Aristotle are to live a beautiful and happy life. Two of the world's most recognized philosophers, Plato and Aristotle, have their own views on this core problem. Plato supports the understanding of ideas; he believes that understanding is the key to a better life. Aristotle supports the view of customs and behavior; he believes that individuals will be gentle through continuous moral behavior. In general, both philosophers have a good position; but in my opinion, a person has a line of strong inference. Plato, Aristotle. Aristotle is a student of Plato. Despite being taught by Plato, they have different theories and perspectives. Their morals are classical and traditional in classical Greece, but Aristotle details the road of virtue and happiness. The political theory of Pluto's utopia society is different from Aristotle's view of "the best state of every society". Their metaphysical theory is completely contrary and very contradictory. Plato and Aristotle have come from the same age Aristotle's criticism against the plateau's formal theory is a major theme and is still expanding. Aristotle does not quote Plato and it often gathers up. The classic commentary therefore endorsed Aristotle as an introduction to Plato. As historians of the past, Aristotle is irreplaceable, but this is a secondary factor in his own dialectic dialect, sometimes dealing with so-called influences as Plato actually said. They also protected them. When studying criticisms of Aristotle's "form", it is beneficial to understand Aristotle's own ghost forms and he intends to preserve Plato's theory largely through this form. Aristotle's shape is very different from Plato's shape. If Plato is seeing the shape as an independent presence, Aristotle is also so. Essentially, for Aristotle, the form is the organizational principle of matter. There is no form of things at all. In this way, the word "form" coincides with modern usage like "form", but the soul is not merely a form. Aristotle distinguishes different kinds of souls. Plants only have a soul of nutrition (ie they are organized in nutrition, growth and decline). Animals have sensuous / perceptive souls (ie, animals are organized to have nutritional souls, but they also have the ability to perceive and perceive things). People have a reasonable soul (ie they are organized to have all of the above and there are reasons) Broadly speaking, in Western culture, discussions usually begin with Plato of classical Greece and Aristotle. Plato believes that mankind is a reasonable social animal He associates our body with our soul and reason, not our bodies. The difference between Aristotle is that he believes that both the body and the soul contribute to our human identity. These theories are not mutually exclusive, but they are built on top of each other and are adapted over time. Descartes (1596 - 1650) extended Plato 's idea and expressed people as a spirit of thought. Later he was criticized by Gilbert Lyle, like Aristotle, who could not completely separate the human psychological process from the physical process. For example, Aristotle and Lyle will agree that hitting a nail during construction of the house essentially combines body and mind.

John Rock is a British philosopher of the 17th century, a doctor known as "father of classical liberalism". Among the most influential enlightenment thinkers, he was the first person who defined himself through continuing consciousness. His work contributed greatly to political philosophy, epistemology, and the development of education. His work stimulated generations of philosophers and had a great influence on Voltaire and Rousseau's love. Born in a small town in the UK, he was the son of a country lawyer. He became an excellent student and enrolled in the famous University of Westminster in London. As a young man, he likes the work of contemporary philosophers over his interest in courses prescribed in research. As philosophy developed, he became interested in medicine and became a professional doctor. He found a leader of the famous doctor Thomas Sedenham. And it placed him under his wings and had a great influence on the development of the philosophy of rock. In addition to his medical career, he served as Secretary of Trade and Plantation Bureau and Secretary of the Carolina House. And it helped shape his political thought. As a political theorist, he made a great contribution to classical republicanism and liberalism, which is embodied in the American Declaration of Independence. British, John Rock. John Rock had a philosophical influence on both political theory and theoretical philosophy, and this influence was reflected in the concept of the period between 1789 and 1914 and the concept of human rights equality. John Rock's work has influenced several diplomats' work on freedom and social contract between the society and the government. Rock 's human and power ideology is the foundation of the concept of power separation. As an enlightening thinker, John Locke wrote two articles. John Rock and John Stuart Mill's freedom definition John Rock thinks that humans should have more freedom in political society than John Stuart Mill. John Rock's "Second Paper of Government" and John Stuart Mill's "Freedom of Expression" outlines the conceptual framework of the ideal nation of each thinker, but influential and powerful literature It is a work. Two different views on human nature and freedom are proposed. On how John Locke and John Stuart Mill have different views John Locke John Locke was born in Somerset, England on August 29, 1632, is a British philosopher and political theorist. Rock was educated at the Oxford Christian church, where he followed traditional classical courses and gained a medical degree with a focus on medical and scientific research, but his interest in philosophy was again revealed by Descartes' research I woke up. Then he joined the family of Anthony Ashley Cooper and later became the Count of Shaftesbury, initially a personal doctor. John Rock (1632-1704) was a British philosopher who played an important role in the creation of modern philosophical empiricism and political liberalism. Locke developed the concept of individual rights and social contracts - a government concept based on rights and responsibilities Locke is an influential figure of Enlightenment and American Revolution. After the civil war ended in 1646, the 14 year old rock was sent to the Westminster School in London. He was a competent student and was chosen as the king's scholar for his academic record - a form of scholarship. However, he did not particularly like the time to go to school; later he broke the public school to emphasize corporal punishment and dry, narrow academic views "One thought on education" (1693) wrote. Locke believes that education should not only promote learning of books but also promote good moral and rational development.

The Doctrine of God's coincidence is the truth of nature's religion and the trinity doctrine is to reveal the truth of religion. Various deity systems provide discussion about sacred existence, unity, and attributes, but they are no longer being implemented. They insisted that the supreme beings are indispensable three and did not try to prove. Because the Christian church is a bit shy in the process of building it by analysis, and it may even protect it for reasons. Saint Augustine was born in 354. During his adolescence he was "lucky" and did not participate in Christian faith. However, Major of Augustine was a rhetoric and found an educational job in Rome. In Rome, he met Milan's bishop Ambrose, who was able to help Augustine through Christianity. Ambrose was the first intellectual Christian of Augustine and Augustine was impressed with his intellectual ability. Ambrose was the source of Augustine 's inspiration. And it inspired his love for Christianity. One of the things that philosophers are good at is usually to ask big questions without providing answers. But Saint Augustine takes a more direct approach to his speculation and often provides a solution to his problem. He told such a topic to the heathens of the city of God. In this article, Augustine solves the problem of free will and extends his view. He points out that humans can possess God's full knowledge of God. St. Augustine St. Augustine (AD 354-430), also known as Hippo Augustine, created his own image through his work and teachings. He was born on November 13, 354 in the town of Tagasto in North Africa. He was born in a middle class family. His father Patricas was a pagan and later became a devout Christian as his wife Monica converted to Christianity. Augustine 's mother has been working on the Roman Catholic church, and she works hard for the conversion of her son. - The confession of St. Augustine in Hippo (398 B.C.) is a theological autobiography and it is called a convert story today. This book is an apology, which means it is both a recognition of faith and a description of life. It means testimony of faith and advocacy of Christian doctrine. This book is not a biography of our contemporary meaning. This book is about the birth of faith. This is the heart of the book Not all godfathers have philosophical significance, but many of them are undoubtedly important. The most important so far is Saint Augustine (354-430) (see Saint Augustine's entry). Augustine is certainly one of the most important and influential philosophers in the Middle Ages and is also one of the most influential philosophers at any time. It was relatively small until much later. Regarding Plato, his influence was mainly felt throughout the work of Augustine for a long time. For over 1000 years after his death, Augustine was the authority that needed to be put. He formed the medieval idea just like any other person. Besides, his influence did not end in the Middle Ages. During the reform, Augustine's call for authority was common to all parties. His lighting theory relies on Marebras and Descartes' natural light ". His attitude towards evil problems and human free will is still widespread today. His powers are felt not only in philosophy, but also in political thought like in theology, mass religion, and exactly the theory of war. (Spades, pp

Reality and politicians (especially Klein), and victim complete our Athens playwright Aristophanes comedy bit of Ness, such as song and dance performances of jokes about imitation of contemporary literature, (Euripides and Aristophanes were Mashi Herodotus ). The joke is not very subtle. In general, there is a happy ending, a wonderful dinner after some complicated things, someone suggesting a crazy plan (...... private peace treaty, God of blessing blindness blindness) The most famous Aristo play, they Lysistrata as long as it does not end the Peloponnesian War between Athens and Sparta, Greek women, we decided not to have her husband and sex. In another drama "cloud", the philosopher Socrates is mocked. In Frogs, Euripides and Ice Cyrus claim to be beyond those who are better poets. This is the world's oldest literary criticism Aeschylus, OresteiaAristishanes, bird, Aristo, cloud Aristo, frog Aristophanes, Aristophanes, Knights of LysistrataAristophanes, peace ÂCuvier, revolutionary upheaval of the discourse of the Earth  Descartes ÂThe surface, discourse  method ÂEuripides, ÂBacchaeÂEuripides, Medea € ¢ â Euripides, ÂOrestes Homer, I Iliad (complete â and ÂAbridged) Homer, Odyssey â (â completely ÂAbridged) K Kant, universal history  natural paradise and  Kant theory, permanent peace  Rukurebin Hughes,  Nietzsche nature of things, good and evil Nietzsche, tragedy of Nietzsche's birth Â, Sophocles AB, genealogy of moral  Nietzsche of Guke,  Adams source follower Crested beyond the history  use and abuse, Antigone source follower cress, Oedipus Rex  Sophocles, Philoctetes For a long time, Plato, Aristophanes are seen as a pioneer of moral criticism poetry. They share conservative sensitivity over Aristo's defamation of Cloud Socrates (Nussbaum 1980). Critics are not always recognized as the influence of Aristo Plato, but also to the essence of imitation. He is used in the technical meaning of words to describe fraud and concealment proposals as well as actors in the drama of what he made. In addition to the conflict between women of Thesmophoria celebrating, such as Ice Cyrus and Euripides, frogs, they are called to imitate the destruction of life and to oppose its natural opposition. Women celebrate the Thesmophoria is suggested Plato, can be said to have discovered the ambiguity dramatic imitation of, in the Republic, composition and performance, since the combination of the role of the present invention is drawn to mimicry, the (1999 Papas) In the class, we discussed in detail the classical Greek drama and the historical background of the women's peace of Aristophanes. Aristophanes is Lysistrata, which play a useful insight into the presence of what age and a large amount of information can not be confirmed, the history of one of the women, it is seen as a form of women is the only entertainment So laughed at the door expanded. Aristophanes 'Lysistrata is a performance of Athens' original drama. - The type of power play due to malicious shock may lead people to make decisions for others who are useless. Midsummer night's dream was written over time, in favor of women, not men. In other words, men have the right to manage events in their own life and others are considered to be unimportant lives.

Introduction People always want to know about divorce and its cause and result. When I am young, why do people get married if I want to divorce in the future? When I grew up, I realized that anyone could divorce. Divorce is a phenomenon that grows globally. 9 weeks ago, I did not know the real definition of divorce, and I did not expect to find all these amazing facts, results and statistics. I chose this topic because it is the only opportunity to discover male divorce and women's awareness. There is no pure fact, that is, from human beliefs, I began to believe that the difference between facts and simple views is wrong. Regardless of whether we write newspaper articles, scientific papers or novels, we always express our opinion on our belief system from a specific point of view in our daily life. This seems like common sense, but Descartes, Western culture, and the recent mass media have begun to explore the "objective truth" to replace human beliefs with "factual logic". In fact, however, they replaced a single belief system with others. Most of us are deadly, "abandoned" in Heidegger's world, embodying chaotic living conditions and forming prejudice. However, in the academic and mass media of the ivory tower it is said that a group of privileged 'rational people' can present intangible views of God in such a way as to directly capture the truth and facts. Therefore, the fact-opinion relationship is mutually exclusive. If the opinion is not based on free access to the correct information and all relevant facts, they can hardly claim validity. If they are based on fantasy, self-deception or intentional falsehood, real debate and discussion is impossible. Therefore, the general practice of telling the truth and the truth is essential for the formation of a rational opinion and the prosperity of political discussion. Furthermore, if past records are destroyed by systematic lies and attempts to rewrite history, political life is deprived of one of its important and stable elements. In short, the practice of telling the truth facts and the truth is extremely important for political life. The conflict of Arent is between reasonable truth and evident view. The former does not allow discussions and objections, but the latter prefers it.

In many cases there are situations of recognized versions and real versions of the situation. Usually, these two versions differ in some way. Some people can understand honestly, but most people can not see the truth of the situation. Instead, they see an incorrect representation of the exact situation. George Orwell's "Very Happy", "Juilliard Shaw's Super American", and Roland Easley's "Time Murderer" show that the truth of the situation is obscured by the appearance. Reality and reality themes in Shakespeare's 'Hamlet' are revealed through misunderstanding of character, dangerous appearance, and misunderstanding of relationship. Personal misunderstandings appear in situations where people seem to have certain personality traits, but they are not. The misunderstanding of these personality is the appearance of the theme and an excellent expression of reality. The use of dangerous outer walls also greatly contributes to the appearance and reality theme. This shows on the betrayal of a certain character that other characters do not know. The last important factor in the development of this theme is the misunderstanding of the relationship. The relationship between various people is misunderstood many times in the whole drama. Many relationships seem to be somehow somewhat, but in reality it is not. Therefore, Shakespeare's "Hamlet" really proves this. Please help me with this work. "MLM of appearance and reality," William Shakespeare's "Hamlet" in "Hamlet" has revealed a consistent theme of apparent and reality in the overall role behavior. In many cases, but it seems so that there is sincerity and honesty, in fact, dishonesty and deception is usually the true intentions of personality. Specifically, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern, Hamlet and Claudius proved a discontinuity between appearance and reality. In the play, these characters The appearance of "Hamlet" is one of the central themes of Shakespeare's "Hamlet". The role of role in the play is the role of the hidden character - in fact the murderer and looter Claudius plays a role of sad brother and legitimate king, in her son's view Gertrude's Adultery plays a role she is the "most harmful woman" who plays the role of "the most beautiful queen". Even Hamlet himself played a crazy role in his attempt. Philosophical problems in Bertrand Russell's "appearance and reality" The approach to his subject in Bertrand Russell's "philosophical problems" involves Descartes' fundamental skepticism, in which the author cancels all previous assumptions It was. Certain reality and existence. In the first chapter, Russell 's quest for reality in reality compared to reality starts with observation of his surroundings. For example, I checked the form and he confirmed it

In his short story "Me and my chimney", Herman Melville tried to keep his old chimney, and he admitted that it was a chimney. He considers "this chimney is a magnificent VIP" (Melville), but since I was thinking that it was a burden and constantly complaining about excluding it as much as possible, I will keep it In particular we objected. I can see that the narrator has spent a lot of time trying to explain the importance of the chimney for him and his wife's plan to drive away the chimney. With respect to the Christian world view, discussion of dualism is excellent in many respects. For beginners, we believe that the belief that God exists and interacts with our world is consistent with double arguments in material and spiritual areas. Materialism does not allow this belief. Dualism also provides a space for the concept of life after death. The interaction between material and spiritual areas in dualism means that your part can survive your physical death and collapse (Cowan 156). There is also biblical evidence of dualism. In the book of Matthew Christ, warn his disciples not to be afraid of those who can kill our bodies, but to destroy our physical and spiritual people. Dualism thinks that human beings are composed of substance or substance (body) and spiritual substance (soul). But where is the soul of the field of dualism? The soul in the body, or the body in the soul? How do two different substances relate and interact with each other? Materialism believes that only matter exists - it is not important. Thus, if non-physical or mental thinking can not affect the body (because the body has no mind), the mental entity or God does not affect the material world. There is no way to explain how the physical world and the world are like gods, or whether they are gods with spiritual beings or entities. Traditional Descartes dualists believe that the world divides the world into two categories: substances and non-substances. These materials include everything we encounter and interact day by day, including our body, and non-materials include all our thoughts, emotions, what we call ourselves included. In a nutshell, the mind comes from the complex biological and physical characteristics we make. But from this point of view, we need to be cautious about the labels of the mind. Non-reducing physicists avoid using the term urgent as they may be confused with ways to assert that the term urgent is urgent

Materialism refuses the idea that the mind is just a reaction Today we believe that everything is material and our idea is chemical and electronic . One implication of this materialistic concept is that our idea reacts only to external stimuli. This is due to a causal relationship. The two reasons for causality are that each effect (or event) has a cause. Nothing happened. Secondly, the causal relationship has a predictable relationship. Leibniz refuses the materialist concept of the mind and strongly opposed the relationship between the body and the mind, in particular the dual view of material dualism embodied in Descartes and his philosophy. According to this dualism, the world contains fundamentally two different substances: extended substance (body) and unexpanded thought substance (thought). Of course, this kind of fork does not lead to psychological manipulation by physical manipulation. But he insists that consciousness and perception can not be achieved by mechanical manipulation of the substance, but without decreasing, Leibniz discovered a similar surprising alternative assuming two different substances. In short, Leibniz has a special place in the historical view of thought and its important relationship. He opposes the position of the materialist and believes that thinking and consciousness can be caught purely by mechanical principles. But he also rejects the dualistic position that the universe has to be divided into two different substances, ideological substances and material substances. Instead, he believes the world will consist of only one substance despite the existence of countless kinds of substances. These substances are unstructured unexpanded entities, some of which have thought and consciousness, others find phenomena in the material world. The sum of these views guarantees Leibniz 's unique position in the history of spiritual philosophy. Professor Trukien and the hippies refuse (1) the view of "rationalistic progress" of history as a series of remarkable improvements in the past, and (2) the belief that matter theory is all decisive determinants ing. While Professor Trukien and Hippie just agree to refuse rather than reasons for refusal, our relatives here may make hippies feel safe in the world of Lord of the Rings. But they also noticed that this explanation was inappropriate and certainly was not enough to explain "popularity of President Gandalf". Or "Frodo live!" The truth is that the work presented at the appropriate time resonates with certain people at one time; the story of a peaceful and stable hobbit and evil modem empire occurs in the American military draft Time is for an unwelcome war ...

Medical philosophy Medical philosophy In a paper entitled "Does medical philosophy exist in Arthur Kaplan in 1992?" He believes that if there is a medical philosophy it will focus on epistemic or metaphysical problems. Kaplan said: "The purpose of medical philosophy is epistemological" (71). Dr. Kaplan added, "The purpose of the survey is to understand what the medical community knows, and to understand what I think is known" (71). In a conversation with Professor Kaplan, he recently said he still believes that his thesis concludes that there is no medical philosophy at the moment. [1] My overall goal is to see those arguments In addition to medical ethics and bioethics, medical philosophy is a field of philosophy including medical epistemology and ontology / metaphysics. In medical epistemology, evidence - based medicine (EBM) (or evidence - based practice (EBP)), in particular the role of randomization, blinding, and placebo, has attracted attention. In connection with these areas of research, ontologies of particular interest for medical philosophy include Descartes dualism, the concept of single genes in disease, and the conceptualization of "placebo" and "placebo effect". There is also growing interest in the metaphysics of medicine, especially the concept of causality. Medical philosophers may be interested in not only the way in which medical knowledge is created but also the nature of these phenomena. Causal relationship is meaningful because the purpose of many medical research is to establish causal relationships such as what causes disease and what improves people. Medical philosophy is a field that seeks the basic questions in the theory, research and practice of health science, especially the themes of metaphysics and epistemology. Its historic roots can be traced back to ancient times, corpus of Hippocrates, and other sources of information, and since at least the 19th century a wide range of academic discussions have been held on key concepts of medical philosophy. There is discussion as to whether there is a unique field called "medical philosophy" (eg Kaplan 1992), but now there are specialized journals and specialized agencies, relatively well-developed academic literature and unique problems. And the problem of insisting that medical philosophy is established can be defended. Finally, medical philosophy helps to discuss methods and objectives in research and practice of medicine and health science.

I do not think, but there are still many differences between modern society and Australian aborigines, but one of them is truly distinctive. Indigenous people respect nature very much. They believe that everything comes from a dream's time, so they are all looking at them as different people. Modern Western society is very different. The people of modern society do not respect the natural world at all. Most people need to control nature, but by doing so they are destroying it. Technological progress will only promote this. Because they are the result of control. DL: No. I think general intelligence is close to philosophical debate. . . I do not know what self-consciousness is and what is consciousness. . . I do not think that this system really is reasoning about this point. However, as more and more interactions take place, it still learns from interactions and can improve over time. DL: I think that word is widely, almost like a word led by marketing. I may be okay. The important thing is that people listen to that idea at the moment. They believe that the system can provide a sense to people, customers, robot owners, and others. This sort has the ability to learn and have some kind of intelligence in its actions. I thought about an artificial intelligence system without machine learning. Descartes said, I am still convinced about this: I think, I am. Even if I think it is false and deceptive, I do not think it is doubtful. Because doubt thinks. If you want to do it, I will be there. That idea is called Cogito in Latin. "I think." It relies on the fact that such statements are self-validating. In other words, since doubt is a form of thinking, I use doubts to make that claim the truth.

The biblical stories of their movies, Matrix, Andy and Rally Wachowski matrix included many implications and symbols to enhance the appeal of this landmark SF movie. With the wonderful stunts and pictures of this movie, the Wakovsky brothers greatly support the attraction of the matrix through a carefully made story that spans time and reality. These implications and symbols include references from notorious authors like Lewis Carroll, John, Jon Bunyan and Descartes. I will study the Bible. : The use of sacred classics in literature is the technique used by authors to change the reader's mind. The idea of ​​the reader is challenging the use of the Bible in literature. In "Mark's Gospel" by Jorge Luis Borges, Borges uses many Biblical references and gives readers different perspectives on the main character. - One of the most outstanding features of the Bible is that it is full of prophecies. Christ himself has accomplished 305 out of the Old Testament prophecies on Messiah. Especially for 70 years of prophecy of Daniel 9th ​​chapter 24-27. Here, we wish not only that the event will lead to the sufferings of Christ and the future prophecies of the day, but also the authority of the author of God's sovereignty. In the context of South African ethnic and cultural issues, Allen Paiton uses Biblical references as a way of maintaining his faith in this struggling country. By using the Biblical reference in his novel, one finds that Ellen Peyton is a religious figure and wishes that his country will change. By crying, Dear Father Peyton talks about the same two very different relationships between two very different families, father and son, your brothers love his own ideas like Christ will do. Importance To dear motherland. In the book, Steven Kumaro found his only son, Absalom, for the murder. He visited his son in prison and allowed him to murder a white man. After visiting my son in prison, Stephen and his brother John are discussing to find a lawyer. John

Gentleman, I do not doubt that you will think seriously about me. "This reminds us of the first important concept of making us think about enlightenment, we tend to think of enlightenment as all-or-nothing, some people will understand or some will not understand I consider relative enlightenment, for example if all or not is correct, do not understand, so please do not speak today Today 's all - or - nothing method is correct, which is a serious methodology It may be the above problem, but it may be enlightened like sex.Madness behavior - What happened when you actually experienced sexual behavior! Ours about enlightenment Is everything like a group of virgins of children who are speculating sexual intercourse? Okay, men and girls, ready to enlightenment In this lesson I will introduce enlightenment. what is that? Enlightenment, also known as the age of enlightenment, was an intellectual movement from the late 17th century to the early 18th century, emphasizing reasons, individualism, and skepticism. Enlightenment challenged the traditional religious view. Because that was such a wide movement, enlightenment did not have an accurate start date. It did not pop up, but it gradually developed. Most historians came to the beginning of enlightenment from the middle of the 17th century to the beginning of the 18th century. The work of intellectuals like Rene Descartes, Barus Spinoza, Isaac Newton is particularly important for enlightenment. In particular, British enlightenment depends on the merit of Sir Isaac Newton whose "principle" shocked the world. His Opticks provided a perfect image of their intelligent enlightenment plan to enlightened thinkers by revealing the nature of the light. As Pope Alexander said, Voltaire is so admiring Newton that his mistress is "Venus - Newton." Newton's physics promises to unleash all the secrets of nature using just reason - do not forget that Newton believes in revelation and reason and writes many comments about the Bible.

Planar geometry refers to planar shapes such as lines, circles, and triangles. Shapes that can be drawn on paper Why do we want geometry? In order to better understand the world around us, discover patterns and find areas, volumes, lengths and angles. Geometry is a study of graphics in a given number of dimensions and spaces of a given type. The most common geometry types are spherical geometry such as planar geometry (processing objects such as points, lines, circles, triangles, polygons), solid geometry (objects such as lines, spheres, polyhedra) and spherical triangles and spherical polygons Processing object). Geometry is part of a quarter of the professors of the Middle Ages. Historically, geometric studies came from several recognized facts (axioms or assumptions) and used systems and strict stepwise proofs to establish true statements. However, geometry far exceeds the way of this relatively dry textbook. This is because beautiful and unexpected results of projected geometry have been proved (Schubert's powerful but problematic enumeration geometry goes without saying). In this article, I will briefly introduce the main branch of the geometry and then describe extensive history processing. For specific branches of geometry, see Euclidean geometry, analytic geometry, projective geometry, differential geometry, non-Euclidean geometry and topology. In some ancient cultures geometric shapes that match the relationships of object length, area, volume were developed. This geometry compiles about 300 generations based on 10 axioms or assumptions in Euclidian elements where hundreds of theorems are proved by deductive logic. Elements are the essence of the century-long axiom deduction method Ancient Greeks, like Egypt and Babylonia, have practiced experimental geometry for centuries. Then they create the first formal mathematics of every type by organizing the geometry with logical rules. An important geometric book of Euclid (400 BC) The Elements forms the basis for most of the geometric foundations of the school. Descartes made the greatest progress in geometry by linking algebra and geometry. One myth is that when you think about placing a point on a plane with a pair of numbers, he is looking around flying around the ceiling. Perhaps this is related to the fact that he is asleep until 11 am everyday. Fermat also discovered coordinate geometry, but that is the Cartesian version we use today.

There is much debate about whether we have full freedom of freedom or whether our choices are caused by others. In this controversy philosophers took three positions of determinism, liberalism, and compatibility theory. The determinists believe that freedom of will does not exist. Since the action is an event with a predetermined reason, you can not select an action and you do not need to select it. My fellow believes that you can have freedom of will and determinism. Before I start, I need to pay attention to the various positions of human freedom issues. In "freedom and self of human beings", Roderick M. Tizam adopted a liberalist position adjacent to nonconformity theory. Liberalists believe in free will and recognize that freedom and determinism are incompatible. Determinists also follow the principle of nonconformity, but according to Tizzam's words they believe that all the events involved in action are caused by other events. Roderick Milton Chisholm is widely recognized as one of the most creative, productive and influential American philosophers of the 20th century. Tizam is involved in epistemology, metaphysics, ethics, philosophy of language, philosophy of mind, and other work areas. His work constitutes a magnificent philosophical system like Leibniz and Descartes. Tizam continues to improve his thinking - sometimes it has been completely modified. He is a prolific writer. The bibliography of his work includes 320 items such as journal articles, reviews, books, and so on. His research on epistemology may guarantee his status as an excellent person in American philosophy. However, he also made a significant contribution in several areas of metaphysics and ethics. Therefore, it is impossible to fully introduce the system of Tizamu with a short article. We do not claim to present his "final and authoritative view" in any field. The concept of acquaintance of Roderick Chisholm (1977) (what he calls "self expression") is clear and is basically cognitive - the state of self expression is the reason why she actually believes in practice anytime I have her there when she was there. This does not explain or assert the special cognitive state of the apparent belief, but Tizam denies that it justifies it. It is self-existential and external beliefs are self-existential. Fumerton (1995, 2001) argues that acquaintance is not a cognitive relationship, but claims that it is unique and unanalyzable; he knows that as acquaintance as we are familiar with it I believe I understand.

As an idea Reed, the citation above cited from Pascal Pensées means what seems to be the reason for degradation. The reasons, the foundation of enlightenment, and the reasons traditionally believed to distinguish between the central characteristics of humans and beasts are considered here to be limited, and their powers are limited. Instead of making Descartes' hope "solid and immovable", it is impossible to perfectly understand the truth of the universe, not to reduce it rationally, but to understand all about it systematically. The power weakened. A man is just a kind of reed, essentially the weakest reed, but he is a reed of thought. There is no need for the whole universe to arm itself to destroy him: enough steam, a drop of water to kill him. But if you want to crush his universe, he will become a noble family than the one who kills him because he knows his death and the superiority of his universe; he knows nothing about the universe Not (Pascal, 1966, p. 35). The meaning is seen as "the process of life ... the fundamental given thing of all experience" (Bugental, 1965, p. 27). As living animals, we are all involved in the existence of literature, but this does not mean that we are engaged in a figurative process of discovering our existence. Humans are metaphorically defined as exclusive experiences since they can understand the struggle of existence themselves. Tanatos - Eros, existence: psychoanalysis - connection of existentialism Ryan D. Miller University of Nebraska Omaha Pascal again depicted the human race in a paradoxical way: "Humans are mere reeds, they are inherently weakest, but he is a reed of thought." Reeds are tall grasses connected. Hollow stem This paradoxical metaphor shows a positive and negative attitude towards human nature. A positive attitude is that Pascal believes it has the special ability human beings think. This is the difference between humans and other forms of life. According to Pascal, we are weak and weak people. But because we have the ability to think, we are the most noble people. As our nobility, essence, and existence depends on our ability to think, Pascal's message says, "Let us think hard: This is the principle of morality." A negative attitude towards human nature Is a way of expressing people. By calling people "reeds", it reminds us how vulnerable and vulnerable humans are. For example, Pascal wrote: "Enough air, a drop of water to kill a human being."

Metaphysical thought of enlightenment was full of changes in the 18th century. Dryden, Pope, and Johnson ruled literature. Fahrenheit is making his first mercury thermometer. Boston Tea ceremony and the French Revolution occurred. However, some of the most intense changes occur in thinking. Before the 18th century, thoughters such as Locke, Spinoza, Descartes, Hobbes dominated Western thought, people's perception of the world changed. Enlightenment, also known as the age of reason, was the era of the entire 18th century society, religion, and political revolution that changed human thoughts during this "waking up" period. This is the liberation of ignorant thoughts, thoughts and actions, and as these thoughts, thoughts and actions have been separated from ignorance of how to maintain and adhere to society, there is little room for new ideas about the world. Puritan society has discovered that these new ideas are extremely radical in comparison. Do you think about relationships with society? From the 17th century to the 18th century, or during the Enlightenment era, thoughts about social relations and interpersonal relationships began to improve, those who used their voice to claim equality and justice, It was difficult to accept. Idea RenéDescartes (French), Discourse Method, 1637. "... ... according to the law that she has established since the ancient dictatorship of the empire and has not been abolished since ancient times ... all arrogant and disobedient serfs and farmers are arrested and the laws taken to the nearest place The Office should not be punished and should not be punished as a public turmoil of peace 4 Mary · Walstone Craft, advocacy of women's rights in 1792

When you start (re) beauty, you find the body of the man reading the author Susan Bordeaux and spill her morning coffee on the shocking sexual clue of the naked man. I first rolled my eyes and settled down, but I will read about the tragedy as to how men are objective and exposed by female advertisements. When I saw the page and saw the exposed image, I was not shocked; this article was written 15 years ago; I saw these images enter the mall It was. When considering these images, please read the excerpt of Susan Bordo's book "Male body", where Bordo thinks of rethinking the body of men with modern advertisements from Calvin Klein and a company like Gucci I will. For Calvin Klein ads, please see another page. February 23: In this course, it is impossible to systematically study gender in Western culture and art. So, I would like to greatly improve our work from the art of ancient Greece until the beginning of the 15th century. What I would like to consider is a calendar illustration of Torres' wealth, a prayer book for the French family royal family Jean de Berry. When the Duke died in 1416, the manuscript was not completed. Illustration studies show how it became a good bridge between the Middle Ages and the Renaissance. In the hearts of Westerners, men are related to the soul, while the body is only related to women in history. Contemporary feminist philosopher Susan Bordd explains the duality of thought and body connection in her work by studying Aristotle, Hegel, and Descartes' early philosophy. How does a unique duality such as spiritual / material and male activities / women's passive work to integrate gender identity and classification? In Bordo, men have historically been related to intelligence, thinking and spirit, but women have been associated with the body for a long time, and the negative effect of this affiliation has been enhanced in the heart / body dichotomy It was. The concept of a woman (but not mind) connected with a woman is the reason for considering women as property, goods and interchangeable goods (men). This is in stark contrast to the role of men as a moral entity responsible for working and fighting in bloody warfare. Since Susan Bordo's "to discover the body of a man beautifully (re)," I feel that people changed when men accepted that they care about their appearance. Bordo argues that men can see pictures of women for a long time but women can see new photographs of men. She talked about men taking a nude picture in their photo as a taboo. Men are not just looking at other men who are not dressed. I believe that it is now more acceptable than Bordo's paper. This is due to the homosexual community, which I think is more acceptable in today's society, but maybe because men are familiar with it. Of course, some pictures are still unpleasant. For homosexual men, it is not uncommon to see pictures of other men depicted sexually, but I think this will change over time. I think confidence is the key to progress.

One way to prove this is the Cartesian triangle theory, which says that the triangle has three sides, but his feelings are not to say that he has three sides. Instead, his wisdom and knowledge tells him that there are three sides in triangle, it means that triangles exist, and that is a clear and unique perception. By linking this with God, we can say that God is like our senses without conveying our intelligence and knowledge, not the existing triangles. By linking this with the real world, he pointed out that Descartes clearly and clearly recognizes that the body occupies material or occupies space. Just as we can know the nature of material things (wax), we can understand the nature of God by pondering our concepts. We can know the essence of God. But does God exist? We understand that God has "objective" reality as our purpose of thinking. But does God also have formal reality? Yes, according to trademark. God exists. In addition to "objective" reality, God has formal reality. That is the conclusion. What is the argument? Thinkers focus on questions about causality. What is the reason for thinking about my god? According to the opinion of thinkers, it is self-evident that, as a general rule, "among the effective and comprehensive causes, there must be at least as many reality as the cause of the cause" (40). This is explained by Cottingham as the principle of causality. If we find a clock, the reason for that clock must be at least as complex as the clock. The same thing can be said if we find the blueprint for that watch. In subsequent propositions, Spinoza discussed several aspects of the causal relationship of God. The most important thing is to distinguish God in two respects. From the nature of God, Spinoza can say something directly. In this sense, God is the reason for "approximation". However, the essence is not enough for limited existing ones. The essence of Peter 's individual is not necessarily the existence of Peter. Conversely, the existence of a finite one leads to the existence of other finite ones. But since everything is in God, then God must be considered as their cause. The essence of God requires his existence. God's "existence can no longer be separated from the essence of God, but it has three equal angles that can be separated from the essence of the triangle" (46). Integrity must exist by definition, as the nature of God includes his totipotency, totipotency, totipotency and infinite integrity. Therefore, the following three logic is correct. The concept of God is the concept that it exists completely.

Appearance and reality In the first chapter, Bertrand Russell basically wants to understand the real meaning of "reality". The truth is that "reality" can not be truly determined. There is a difference between believing and actual knowledge. For example, I know that the table in front of the classroom is genuine. I know this. Because all my feelings are in agreement. Well, problems arise when trying to determine the color, texture, and even the shape of the table. As in the example in this article, the color of the table will change depending on the amount of light above the table. Please help me with this work. "The appearance and reality of MLM" in "Hamlet" William · Shakespeare's "Hamlet" reveals a consistent theme of appearance and reality in overall role behavior. In many cases, since honesty and integrity seems to exist, in reality, dishonesty and deception are usually the true intent of character. Specifically, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern, Hamlet and Claudius proved a discontinuity between appearance and reality. In the play, these characters The appearance of "Hamlet" is one of the central themes of Shakespeare's "Hamlet". The role of role in the play is the role of the hidden character - in fact the murderer and looter Claudius plays a role of sad brother and legitimate king, in her son's view Gertrude's Adultery plays a role she is the "most harmful woman" who plays the role of "the most beautiful queen". Even Hamlet himself played a crazy role in his attempt. Philosophical problems in Bertrand Russell's "appearance and reality" The approach to his subject in Bertrand Russell's "philosophical problems" involves Descartes' fundamental skepticism, in which the author cancels all previous assumptions It was. Certain reality and existence. In the first chapter, Russell 's quest for reality in reality compared to reality starts with observation of his surroundings. For example, I checked the form and he confirmed it The appearance and reality of Peter Shaffer's Amadeus in the 18th century world are all appearance and appearance often compete with reality. This is the case of Amadeus Peter Shafer, following the music career of Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart. Mozart 's career was surrounded by fraud and falsehood due to poor choice when he was always destroyed by Salieri. When Mozart arrived in Vienna Antonio Salieri pretended to welcome in real life, we should not judge them based solely on their appearance. There are many people who seem to be reliable, but they are not. Appearance and reality are important themes of William Shakespeare's Macbeth. The subject focuses on the tragic result of such mistakes in personality and judgment fooled by seemingly authentic people. These characters include Duncan exorcising Macbeth, Witch and Macbeth of her own tricks, Macbeth.

"I do not think my high-level project is confusing René Descartes!" When I entered the ninth class through the corridor, I told Megan. Since the second grade, Megan and I have always become friends. "Oh, believe me, I am very sorry for you," she answered with a sympathetic smile. But she has Elvis, one of the best topics. This is not too difficult. I must admit that I began to feel a bit embarrassed. If you are fed up with your articles, you may choose the wrong topic (one does not affect you and may not affect others), you are below the standard A way to approach a good topic. Maybe you are dissatisfied with writing papers, fearing to accept, being lazy, being ignorant, excessive arrogant doubts, or the like. In order to write correctly, you have to put yourself in the right way of thinking. This spiritual part is aesthetic. You must work hard in order to create something worthy, beautiful and elegant. If you think this is ridiculous, you are not as stupid as you can write now. You need to strive for a long time to think about why you dare to consider value, beauty and elegance is not worth pursuing. Are you planning to settle down for ugly rude people? Do you want to destroy without building? The topic is boring - we were there. You will get a topic about writing, but it is very boring, you think your thought is empty. In order to successfully overcome this obstacle, you should choose specific topic aspect or related content you are interested in. In addition, you can talk to your tutor or client and ask questions about the topic to get more information about what you can use as a work guide. This will give you some ideas to get started on. You do not want to write / understand this topic - convince yourself that you are responsible for starting and completing the project based on the deadline. Furthermore, using a variety of motivational strategies that we consider to be effective to motivate writing, always write that all the papers (schools or work) you write will increase your experience and improve you You should keep in mind. If you do not understand the assignment, please consult your tutor or client, or spend extra time investigating the topic The first thing to do when you start a research paper is to think about the topic. Try to choose topics that you and your teacher are interested in - Funny topics are easier to write than boring topics! Please make sure that your topic is not too difficult to study and that you have enough material on the subject. Talk to your topic, especially your teacher as much as possible. You will be amazed at the idea you get when talking about your topic. Remember to talk about potential topics with your teacher

Interest in the human eye You are a fan of Dr. Coca-Cola, Sprite, Pepper. The number of Proactiv commercials you witness every day. There are several pairs of Jordan, van, and kids in your closet. How many people watched these shoes on your day? All of these products are very popular and the demand for these products is very high. Consumers are yours. In order to satisfy people, the industry and the company proposed a better product version, added new members to the brand, gave them a different look and made celebrities recognize it. Today, our brain gains a large part of information through our eyes. Our eyes play an important role in how we see the design. The structure of the human eye is complicated, but the most important discovery is that some of the eyes in the center of the eye are called "eyeballs". It is a small circle (1.5 mm wide) which is part of our brain, and we get most information through it. There are three reasons for this. On the other hand, our peripheral vision is very poor. really. Please think about the way you are reading this article now. You pay attention to these precise words, everything else is irrelevant. This is only a small part of the overall design. Interestingly, however, our brains will help our eyes based on our expectations and memories and try to fill the missing data around us. This makes us misunderstand that we actually saw everything soon. According to my research, the third one is the energy center, or chakra, present in everyone on Earth. It is either a physical gland, a gland of the pineal gland, or a quantum projector of human consciousness, which allows us to dream. French philosophers, mathematicians, and scientists René Descartes expressed it as "the main seat of the soul." I also saw it called the center of intuition and creativity. In the majority of my life, I thought this conversation was pseudoscientific, and even after experiencing my own third awakening, I was still skeptical.

A combination of science and industry was witnessed in the late nineteenth century and continues today. The development of technology is no longer strictly an area of ​​independent inventors, but it is guided and funded by companies seeking new products. At the same time, technology is becoming a part of our daily lives, making the world smaller and becoming a more important force in forming events in Europe and the world. People in the 1890s had expectations for the future. In 1939, the world exposition known as "the world of tomorrow" was held in New York. The 21st century has reached the glory of scientific progress and hope for a better world. Rather, it has dramatically increased our violence from individual terrorist acts to an imminent global conflict threat. Many of us believe that the world is losing control and trying to regain the balance and meaning of our lives. The purpose of this book is to deepen the understanding of the current problem and lead the reader through a turbulent compass in front of us. The first part of the book provides a new theoretical framework for understanding the social dynamics of the modern world. Assuming that the scientist provides the answer, the author starts his investigation from the point of view of technicians and atheists. Unexpectedly, he discovered; science can not do it. It is a bit surprising that the general 'world-centric' secular science based on Descartes binaryism explains our thoughts from our body 400 years ago. Based on the promised future truth, the world can be experienced as history. The eschatological consciousness of hopeful events in the resurrection of Christ evokes our nostalgia and expectations for history. Therefore, each view that considers the world as an independent universe, or that regards history as materializing the universal whole of sacred truth, is destroyed and converted into a key to the eschatological theory of "still" . As our knowledge has a transcendental and temporary character which is characterized by dedication and expectation as a kind of wishful knowledge, it recognizes the open vision of the real future and thus limited human experience It holds. To think about God and history based on the promised event of Christ's resurrection means to prove God from the world and history to show that the world is an open history to God and God It is not. future

The central theme of the prince is the importance of obtaining political power and power in the political realm. This theory has also repeatedly focused on its importance for the promotion of national and human well-being. State is considered an essential condition to achieve maximum profit. Machiavelli is a Utilitarian in the opinion of the government. Whatever gives the king political power, no matter how familiar or disinterested in its behavior, it is regarded as honest. The nation has standards that are in line with the interests such as peace and order, protecting citizens, so we need to master everything. With a good idea there is a big change. Niccolo Machiavelli, John Locke, Karl Marx are famous philosophers who have paved the way for the most prominent form of government in the world. Through their literature they have created a wave of revolutionary ideas that have existed in several forms of government to date. Meanwhile, Machiavelli insists on political absoluteism. It is a form of governance and rulers accept the power to impart a single ruler who is usually attributed to that animal. However, this does not give us the right to ignore emotions beyond rationality, but other animals do not have the same qualities. Discussion on Rene Descartes 'first philosophy, Nicolo Machiavelli's "Prince" and Thomas Hobbes' Leviathan backed this ideology. Integrating emotions is also the foundation of human existence In the early nineteenth century after the recession almost eliminated the hope of Europe, there were four elite philosophers who gave a certain degree of faith to the people. New ideas about people and politics quickly emerged and people discussed the ideologies of other people. - How will you be successful and become a strong leader? What is the basic basic function? These problems have been raised centuries ago and raised today. Niccolo Machiavelli wrote the most influential paper on leadership but is still used for politics and management. The clear concept he explores is to find the balance between good and justice and practice cautiously chosen fraud and defamation.

Understanding the scientific revolution The scientific revolution is the era of change and new thinking. Many innovators have new ideas for this planet and many other things, but most people are thinking about the challenge of teaching these new concepts. This revolution is very important for the development of mankind and contemporary historians use the original capital letters to express this sentence. The transformation of this idea took only 2 century to be established in Western Europe; the long-term crisis of today is called scientific revolution. Both sides need to understand how the scientific revolution has occurred. Why do people have to propose various paradigms and views of the world that are not yet supported by the mainstream scientific consensus? Science starts with the assumption of a new way of seeing things. Next, test the sample. If it is coherent and has some precision, it can be considered a useful theory. It is useful as a tool in many possible examples and theories and gives us insight into the complexity of the world Understanding the scientific revolution The scientific revolution is the era of change and new thinking. Many innovators have new ideas for this planet and many other things, but most people are thinking about the challenge of teaching these new concepts. This revolution is very important for the development of mankind and contemporary historians use the original capital letters to express this sentence. - In Europe there was a big change between 1300 and 1600. Renaissance and many religious reforms, and many changes in the art of people's view of the world, have cast new doubts. There are many revolution, but another revolution has been introduced. During the scientific revolution, scientists such as Galileo, Copernicus, Descartes, Bacon discussed the potential of God, human ability and the possibility to understand the world. Ultimately, the impact of the new scientific discoveries will begin to influence the way people and people think in Europe. Society began to question the authority of traditional knowledge about space. This in turn makes them suspect the national traditional view and the concept of social order. In the scientific revolution, "Human thought has changed from medieval world to emphasize the eternal world of God managing humanity, the universe, and nature, a method derived from the understanding of unchanging knowledge and the laws of nature "The accepted truth has nothing to do with it." Scientists have changed the perception of the people world. For centuries before the scientific revolution, people tried to understand natural phenomena from the perspective of doctrine and philosophical thinking. Scientists are satisfied to try depicting the world by relying on the integration of Aristotle's framework and doctrine. During the scientific revolution scientists began accepting empiricism as a way of better understanding the complexity of nature. - From the 16th century to the 18th century, the scientific revolution, the Enlightenment Revolution, the political revolution caused three major revolutions. All these revolutions have shaped Western thinking and ideals, and today even in this age they continue to shape Western ideas and ideals. If one of the three things that we think today is the most important to shape our idea of ​​science, politics and social structure

Regardless of whether we are portraying our perceptions or depicting the perception of the physical world, consciousness is the experience we have every day. David Chalmers provides insight into consciousness by first identifying simple questions presented by awareness and then identifying confusing issues and problems that can not be fully explained. This problem is an important topic, and many philosophers are trying to provide a solution to this problem. For Chalmers, difficult questions are related to our experience. Is there a possibility that consciousness problem and material problem are related? There is a tradition of linking physical and conscious problems. In other words, it is the field of quantum theory of consciousness. Quantum physics and consciousness are inexplicable, so these theories may be falsely false. The idea of ​​a connection between a strong awareness problem and a difficult material problem may be subject to the same criticism. However, if you look closely, it is clear that these two problems are complementary in a deeper and clearer manner. One of the first philosophers who noticed this relationship was Leibniz until the late 17th century, but the exact modern version of this idea was attributed to Bertrand Russell. Recently, modern philosophers including Chalmers and Strawson rediscovered it. It is like this When philosophers talk about problems of consciousness, they are talking about figuring out how consciousness fits the substance world. Philosopher Galen Strawson believes that it is difficult to solve this problem because consciousness is inexplicable. - But we still do not understand the essence of the material world. Many people introduce philosophy through extreme skepticism related to Rene Descartes: can I dream now? Do you think that everything I know might be the product of some big fraud made by demonic devils? Today, many philosophers seem to think that radical skepticism is not worthy of our attention, but skeptical subjects remain, and for many people it remains as a worrisome problem I will. Philosopher Duncan Pritchard discusses the subject from his recent book "Understanding of Anxiety: Fundamental Skepticism and Unfounded Beliefs" The question of consciousness is what is consciousness and why are we more conscious than philosophical zombies? Adjective "difficult" contrasts with "simple" consciousness problem which tries to explain the mechanism of consciousness ("why" and "how" or ultimate cause and effective reason). The question of consciousness is to question whether all sensual beings have experienced a conscious experience rather than questioning the neurochemical constitution of life.

Disney Male Characters (Prince) and Female Characters (Princess) Because they do not think there is a romantic link, they have an image of the princess of a young girl who will feel that they are not affluent handsome England, Descartes, Collier - Mick, 3). In addition, they think it is difficult for them to see. Girls watching Disney Princess movies believe that the Prince of men will marry them, if they look very fascinating, very nice, they will live happily ever after. As we all know, the Princess of Disney cartoon movies for the lives of young girls painted all the princesses and had a great influence. Disney Princess is used to sleep Snow White, Cinderella, Little Mermaid, Bell, Wind and Courage. They are loved by millions of people and are recognized throughout the United States, from cups to clothing. Disney is synthesized with the popular image of the princess' s story "All Princess Princess" to create images. She is a member of the Walt Disney Company billions of dollars lifestyle brand, she is a Disney Princess ...... Move the shiny hair anywhere in the world, brightly clothes a young girl Wearing, it is very beautiful. From movies to interactive websites with over 250,000 items, Disney Princess is affecting millions of girls every day. Disney proudly announced that the information sent from the princess declared "Disney Princess characters have their own stories so that girls can imagine their fairy tales and live," the Disney movies We do not like it, we believe that healthy (business) line). Disney Princess to yield to social patriarchal University of Pennsylvania 3808 Walnut Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104 to 6121 www.writing.upenn.edu/critical From 16th October 1923, Disney was the source of inspiration for children. At the beginning of Mickey Mouse cartoon, Disney made imaginative empire. Since 1937, the first Princess Disney Princess Snow White appearing on the screen, a young woman surprised by the "Disney Princess" vision appeared. Over the years, princess boarding dozens of movie screens, Disney has billions of dollars of profits from these people. In fact, Disney affected the immature view of the beauty of the woman he wanted

En · Light · Ened · Ly · Adverben · Light · Ened · Noun · Light · Ener, Nounen · Light · Enningly, Adverbnon · En · Light · Ened, Adjectivenon · En · Light · en · Ing, Adjective · Light · en, Verb (for objects) pre · en · light · en, verb, noun · en · light · en, verb (for objects) unen en · light · ened, adjective · en · light · en · ing, adjective well · en · light · ened, adjective Okay, men and girls, ready to enlightenment In this lesson I will introduce enlightenment. what is that? Enlightenment, also known as the age of enlightenment, was an intellectual movement from the late 17th century to the early 18th century, emphasizing reasons, individualism, and skepticism. Enlightenment challenged the traditional religious view. Because that was such a wide movement, enlightenment did not have an accurate start date. It did not pop up, but it gradually developed. Most historians came to the beginning of enlightenment from the middle of the 17th century to the beginning of the 18th century. The work of intellectuals like Rene Descartes, Barus Spinoza, Isaac Newton is particularly important for enlightenment. In particular, British enlightenment depends on the merit of Sir Isaac Newton whose "principle" shocked the world. His Opticks provided a perfect image of their intelligent enlightenment plan to enlightened thinkers by revealing the nature of the light. As Pope Alexander said, Voltaire is so admiring Newton that his mistress is "Venus - Newton." Newton's physics promises to unleash all the secrets of nature using just reason - do not forget that Newton believes in revelation and reason and writes many comments about the Bible. Enlightenment (also known as the age of enlightenment and reason; French: "century of light" leSiècledes Lumières; and German: "enlightenment" Aufklärung) is an intellectual and philosophical movement of the 18th century and is Europe . The world of thought dominates. Enlightenment included a series of ideas that used rationality as the main source of authority and justification, ideas such as freedom, progress, tolerance, fraternity, constitutionalism, and separation of church and state were proposed. In France, the central principle of lesLumières is personal freedom and religious tolerance to the monarchy and the absolute principle of the Roman Catholic Church. Enlightenment is characterized by emphasizing scientific methods and simplification, and more questions about religious legitimacy - this attitude is captured by Sapere aude.

Cognitive psychology or cognitive science are better known and are designed to understand how people or machines access, store, search and apply knowledge and information. Sensory evaluation is a field of analyzing how foods are recognized (Herve Abdi, 2002). Sensory evaluation shows that science is necessary to control stimuli that are complicated and do not cause confusion of natural and ecological effectiveness. Sensory evaluation can pioneer research in new areas attractive for cognitive scientists. Running Head: Definition of Cognitive Psychology 1 Definition of Cognitive Psychology Heather Burgess PSY 360 October 24, 1013 Dr. Matt Pearcey Definition of Cognitive Psychology 2 Definition of Cognitive Psychology Cognitive psychology involves learning, memory, perception And a study of the psychological process of thinking. Relatively speaking, it is still relatively new, as an official department of psychology, its roots can be traced back to Descartes, which tries to explain how thought works and "hydraulic system of neural function" We propose analogy. 2007, page 26) After he observed the animated statue of Saint-Germain-en-Laye. It is not only a constant pursuit of how the mind works, but also a merciless pursuit of the spiritual composition that ultimately forms the basis of cognitive theory. It is clear that different approaches are needed when psychologists study how psychological processes produce behavior. It only thinks of what I learned through rewards and punishments. In the 1970s, most of psychology returned to the study of mind. Cognitive psychology studies memory, information processing, decision making and so on. Attribution theory explains how thinking (about what it leads to) can affect behavior, rational emotional therapists say that thought (irrational thinking) creates emotions . Our own behavior, when we have done well, we are satisfied with the inner strengthening. He believes that self-compensation behavior is as good and probably better as external strengthening behavior. Bandura also researched widely about the concept of self-efficacy. This is a personal perception of your ability and ability to control yourself. For 60 years, the comparative philosophy of behavioral psychology and cognitive psychology competed for the spirit of psychology. From the 1920s to the 1950s, behavioral psychology dominated many psychological thoughts, but the cognitive revolution of the 1950s cracked the radical theory and cognitive psychology eventually won the dominance. However, both psychologists have begun to recognize that both methods are valuable for patient treatment, resulting in comprehensive cognitive-behavioral therapy. Most psychologists now use a combination of behavioral therapy and cognitive therapy

Women's role in society According to Friedrich Nietzsche, Albert Camus, Lech Tolstoy, I am beautiful and mysterious. I am satisfied with the simple pleasures of my life. I have no desire beyond appearance and beauty. I am very smart, but I do not need to show wisdom. In fact, showing my wisdom will ruin me; it will reduce my sexual desire and despise my beauty. My wisdom will destroy my wish. I am full of fear. It is this fear that it determines my femininity; this fear helps me complete my woman's role. Frankel quotes or quotes experienced philosophers, writers and painters of MSFM, such as Sigmund Freud, Alfred Adler, Baruch Spinoza, Ge. Tesod Lessing, Fedor Dostoevsky, Man of Albrecht, Leo Tolstoy, Thomas Mann, Friedrich Nietzsche, Rainer Maria Rilke and Albert Camus. We assign each student the master Frankl references in MSFM. Let each student learn the concept of the meaning of life by thinkers and artists. Ask the students to write research papers on the selected characters or to discuss the meaning of life from the perspective of the designated individual. Mock interviews with each author and students become actors Women's role in society According to Friedrich Nietzsche, Albert Camus, Lech Tolstoy, I am beautiful and mysterious. I am satisfied with the simple pleasures of my life. I have no desire beyond appearance and beauty. I am very smart, but I do not need to show wisdom. In fact, showing my wisdom will ruin me; it will reduce my sexual desire and despise my beauty. My wisdom will destroy my wish. I am full of fear. - Why people try to tempt someone sexually. Lev Tolstoy once said, "In my opinion, love is like a heart if there are as many hearts and hearts as possible." I impressed her with exciting words or his poetic words Existentialism originates in the philosophers SørenKierkegaard and Friedrich Nietzsche of the 19th century, but they are not used in their work. French existentialists such as Jean-Paul Sartre, Albert Camus (1913 - 1960), Simone de Beauvoir (1908 - 1986) from the 1940's to the 1950's included academic and imaginary works I wrote. Promote the existence of themes such as fear, boredom, alienation, absurdity, freedom, dedication, meaninglessness. Unlike René Descartes where belief is a top priority, existentialists are "thrown" into a concrete and incomplete universe that human beings can not "think", so existence ("in the world") exists We insist that it leads to consciousness. It is the ultimate reality. Therefore, contrary to the traditional Greek philosophy of ancient Greeks, it exists essentially before existence (essentially possible for the meaning of life). As Sartre said, "At first there was nothing.

When asked to define psychology, there are many ideas to run through my mind. Psychology is a scientific study of thought and behavior. For example, when you try to explain to others what others are doing, people think psychologically every day. There are many research fields that try to understand how people think and what they are doing. Psychology is used not only for studying human behavior but also for many different reasons to help people with psychiatric disorders and try to understand what they are with their problems. Running Head: Definition of Cognitive Psychology 1 Definition of Cognitive Psychology Heather Burgess PSY 360 October 24, 1013 Dr. Matt Pearcey Definition of Cognitive Psychology 2 Definition of Cognitive Psychology Cognitive psychology involves learning, memory, perception And a study of the psychological process of thinking. Relatively speaking, it is still relatively new, as an official department of psychology, its roots can be traced back to Descartes, which tries to explain how thought works and "hydraulic system of neural function" We propose analogy. 2007, page 26) After he observed the animated statue of Saint-Germain-en-Laye. It is not only a constant pursuit of how the mind works, but also a merciless pursuit of the spiritual composition that ultimately forms the basis of cognitive theory. It is clear that different approaches are needed when psychologists study how psychological processes produce behavior. It only thinks of what I learned through rewards and punishments. In 1929, psychology was defined as a study of consciousness. From 1930 to around 1970, the definition of psychology changed as the treatment of scientific research on behavior increased. Since around 1970, psychology has been defined as a scientific research on behavioral and psychological processes. But according to the definition of psychology today, it can be defined as a study of behavior and human thought. Factors Affecting Behavior Shauna Carton Psy 490 May 13, 2014 Lena Klumper Diversity of Psychology The American Psychological Association identified 54 departments in the field of psychology (Plante, 2011) . Each department is derived from one of seven key ideas: psychodynamics, behavioral science, humanities, cognition, social chemistry, biology, progress. This diversity in psychology,

A woman is a rational animal "But when I think that there is a very powerful thing, as I am talking about now, will a malicious fraudster deliberately try to deceive me?" (Decartes, 19). These words by Descartes appear to be directly related to the fraud theme of Princesse De Cleves. In a world that is a mere fictitious world created by inevitable appearance, there is nothing that is so crave and respectful that it seems to be reasoning about the circumstances for public interest initially . "Man is not a reasonable animal, he is a rationalized animal," Robert A Heinlein wrote once. In the universe we do not understand, spiritual stories make a furious sound with a sense of athletes deeply wearing scorpions when we walk on a black sea on a spinning ball . Our actions are based on the conditions we accumulated here. Most of them come from other people who showed their own conditions accumulated from generation to generation. We say that humans are rational animals. They are not composed of animals and reason. We say that humans are the third entity of soul and body, and it is neither of them. People are said to be composed of animals and reason, but that is not the third reality, but the third concept. Unity and community are included in the definition of universality, but since they are not human beings, there is essentially no universal nature. Also, we can not say that human nature possesses genus or species characteristics. Because it is not seen in that person that the person's property belongs to all essences. Human nature has species characteristics only through existence in intelligence. As it has intelligence, this property has no seed characteristics unless it involves that accident The human reason is not mere perception of highly advanced animals. The human reason is qualitatively different from the perception of animals - it differs in ontology. Human reasons are different as it is irrelevant. Since universality is not itself important and can not be materialized as a problem, there is no material realization of thinking about universality. I am here to emphasize the difference between expression and materialization. Represents a map of things. Instantiation is itself a thing. Universality can be expressed material - the words I write in this article are conceptual representations - but universality can not be materialized in material terms. I can not write the concept itself on a computer screen or paper and these concepts can not exist in my brain. Because the universal concept is not important

My personal philosophy has many philosophies and beliefs that can be recognized and discussed in this world. Some consist of several evidences and some are supported by direct evidence. Some people do not agree, others agree. I firmly believe that there is no right or wrong belief or philosophy as long as there is a reason for you to say what you said. You believe what you want. The three themes I share in my faith are reality, society, and destiny. What is the main school of philosophy? Idealism can be divided into three categories: classical, religious, and contemporary. Classical idealism, Greek philosophy of Socrates and Plato seek absolute truth. Religious idealism tries to harmonize God with humanity. Contemporary idealism derived from Descartes' thought connects perception and existence. Realism is a school of thinking established by Aristotle, and he believes that the material world is separate from the concept of human beings. Modern realism has brought the concept of "whiteboard" of human ability. Practicalism thinks that you should choose the best results from ideas, actions and results, learn from past experiences and achieve desirable results. John Dewey's experimentalism is introducing scientific methods of induction reasoning into the field of education. In philosophy, idealism is a series of metaphysical philosophies claiming that reality or reality recognizable to humans is fundamentally mentally or spiritually constructed or not important. In epistemology, idealism casts doubts about the possibility of knowing anything irrelevant to the mind. Contrary to materialism, idealism considers the superiority of consciousness to be the origin and prerequisite of material phenomena. According to this view, consciousness exists before the existence of substance and is a prerequisite for the existence of substances. Consciousness creates and decides matter rather than opposite. Idealism thinks that consciousness and thought are the origin of the material world and aims to explain the existing world based on these principles. In philosophy, Lenin claims materialism and subjectivity as a third-party philosophy, or asserts dualismism of naturalism and supernaturalism, arguing by interpreting positivism or mechanical materialism as idealism and metaphysics . Denial of dialectical materialism. He adhered to the position of scientific materialism and pointed out that the opposite unity is the most basic material dialectic of three contradictory laws (opposite unity, denial of denial and change in quantity) .

Abstract of contemporary cosmology and philosophy and the beginning of the universe: Since the 1970's, the theme of 'origin of the universe' has been controversial in physics and cosmology. This suggests that this interesting question is being studied scientifically and is probably a solution. The aim of this paper is to answer questions about whether the origin of the world has been removed from the hands of philosophers (and theologians) and transferred to the field of science, and whether science can solve this problem by itself is. Cosmology is a metaphysical study of the structure and nature of the entire universe. Cosmology is a field of ancient philosophy that focused on the origin of the universe. Since the beginning of the recorded history (without any doubt) human beings have been fascinated by the questions raised by the investigation of the universe and the birth of the universe. People are often wrong, but from the uncertainty they think of many incompatible answers, but there are some common patterns and reasons for these conclusions. Differences in these conclusions may reflect differences in the economic, social order and environment of different civilizations. The main focus of this paper is the development of authoritarian thought, especially the development of Ionian rationalists. Before the development of the Greek civilization, people doubtless speculated that the world exceeded the direct experience, but their survey records could not survive. Essay.com/ Cosmology and cosmology in the world of ancient Greece: Discuss the origin and development of Greek cosmology and cosmology from the 8th century BC to the 5th century BC Cosmology and cosmology in the ancient Greek world: an argument about the origin and development of Greek cosmology and cosmology from the 8th century BC to the 5th century Discussion of cosmology first derives from examining some of the universe's experience and metaphysical facts and then something outside the universe inevitably leads to its existence. There are various types of cosmological arguments, and their defenders include some of the best thinkers across the history of philosophy, including Plato, Aristotle, Ibunsina, Argazari, Mimonides, Aquinas, Descartes . And Leibniz. Three versions of many attention-grabbing discussions are the Thomistic Contingency argument, the Leibnizian's complete reason argument, and the kalam argument. In the case of the Kalam cosmological argument, the difference between the universe and God is that there is a beginning in time for the universe. Everything that has time to start claiming by Kalam Cosmological Argument will exist. When there is a beginning of time in the universe, that argument concludes that the universe has its cause, the reason is God. The existence of unaffected God is consistent with the initial assertion of this discussion since there is no time to start. "There is a reason for everything that has time to start." Therefore, the existence of God whose cause is unknown causes no problems. In discussing the above simple cosmological argument

Morris B. Kaplan introduced Socrates' s way of reading and friendly translating Socrates's ancient dialogue and some of his most famous debating partners. Every dialogue shows that those with serious problems with Socrates are indeed the center of Socrates' reactions and tasks. Very recently, US "customer-centered" treatment practitioner Carl Rogers argued that those seeking clarification are in the same central position as the future direction. Socrates shows respect for his whistle, even if they ultimately object to him. Likewise, people will "blame" the problems of other people and finally realize that it is their own to solve and advance their own problems. It is the responsibility of the counselor or therapist to support the process, not to provide insight. Like Socrates, modern psychotherapists insist on "ignorance" - meaning "I do not provide insight but only help you explore your own problems". Indeed, Socrates will challenge the 17th century philosopher René Descartes, the pioneer of 18th century science and philosophy enlightenment. Ergo sum (I agree, so I was misrepresented by Socrates's saying "Dubito"; Ergo sum (I doubt that Socrates initially suspects credibility first He believes the truth, but he doubts his ability to acquire or recognize this truth in the presence of himself, he is ignorant when he tries to destroy his prejudice He thought boldly about ignorance, which constitutes a highly savvy weapon against the enemy, which is why Socrates is still a model of legal professionals. The Socratic Seminar continued the tradition of Socrates, an ancient Greek philosopher who taught his followers through question. Today, Socrates 'dialogue can further change the student' s learning experience from elementary to high school and in the classroom. With the help of a skilled teacher, Paydea 's attitude towards Socratic seminars can lead to the fact that the Socratic Seminar is understood as some form of teaching through questioning. However, Paideia advocates a more rigorous approach aimed at improving students' critical thinking and communication skills. We define the Socratic Seminar as a joint and useful dialogue containing unresolved questions about the text. Morris B. Kaplan introduced Socrates' s way of reading and friendly translating Socrates's ancient dialogue and some of his most famous debating partners. Every dialogue shows that those with serious problems with Socrates are indeed the center of Socrates' reactions and tasks. Very recently, US "customer-centered" treatment practitioner Carl Rogers argued that those seeking clarification are in the same central position as the future direction. Socrates shows respect for his whistle, even if they ultimately object to him. Likewise, people will "blame" the problems of other people and finally realize that it is their own to solve and advance their own problems. Counselors and therapists are responsible for supporting the process, not providing insight.

In the famous or several circles of Ayn Rand, in the infamous infamous story, different ideologies of objectiveism and collectivism are opposed to each other. Objectiveism is so close that it is almost impossible to really trace it completely, unlike book society. However, as a whole Anthem did not violate the objective philosophy philosophy of the land. At the beginning of the beginner, readers were introduced to the collectivist society that came out after the era called "Unmentionable Times". People believed that great damage resulted in fear of the new society. . Paul Ryan is the persistence of philosophical objectiveism. Objectiveism, known for Ayn Rand 's novel "Atlas Shrugged", praises individuals in unconstrained capitalism. The main driving force of Ironland's pastoral poetry is self-interest. This is a world without altruism. If you succeed, I assume you have to make a good choice in life and get all the results of your labor. The idea of ​​returning to a system that provides a means of success does not apply to this moral construction. If you are not doing well, that is because you made a bad choice, the next time you are lucky! Randism is an individualism movement established by Ian Land and is called objectiveism by its followers. A theory or method based on the assertion that rationalist human reason can be the source of all knowledge in principle. In modern times, rationalism was the first to be supported by Rene Descartes, spreading mainly in the European continent in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. It opposes empiricism. Moral realism is a combination of three ideas: 1) moral judgment to express beliefs, 2) truth or false of these beliefs, and 3) objective moral value. It is in stark contrast to the expressionist or uncognitive theory of moral judgment, the wrong theory of moral judgment, the fictional theory of moral judgment, the constitutionalism of relativity or the theory of relativism. The name "objectiveism" also refers to the philosophy of Ayn Rand (5). Objectiveism is a comprehensive and comprehensive philosophical system covering ontology, epistemology, ethics, political science, aesthetics. That morality is based on virtue and reasonable self-interest. It can be regarded as very narrow and fruitful, its merit being dependent on the ability to achieve very specific results of personal survival and prosperity. On the personal side, let me say that there is no great insight of Ayn Rand. Many ethical frameworks I have shown here are based on her philosophy. But I also want to thank Nathaniel Branden for his important contribution to psychology and self-esteem. Whether or not my system should be regarded as interpretation of objective ethics is controversial. Some objectivists may think that it is legitimate development and other objectiveists certainly are thinking that it is heresy.

The essence of mathematics depends on logic and creativity, but it can be used not only for basic profit but also for various practical purposes. The essence of mathematics lies in its beauty and intellectual challenges. This paper is divided into three parts: pattern and relationship, mathematics, science and technology, and mathematical exploration. First, mathematics is the science of patterns and relationships. As a theoretical order, mathematics explores relationships that may exist between abstracts, regardless of whether the abstraction has something corresponding to the real world. Keith: In natural science, mathematics is an absolute ruler. If you break the law of mathematics, you no longer do physics, astronomy etc. But in the humanities, mathematics is just a tool. It's all right, and it's always been more convenient, but it's still just a tool. Good bye to my book, Descartes seeks to clarify the inherent limitations of the mathematical method ("Cartesian method") in human science that I saw. Mathematics is indispensable in various fields such as natural science, engineering, medicine, finance, social science and so on. Applied mathematics has led to new mathematical fields such as statistics and game theory. Mathematicians are engaged in mathematics without thinking of any application for pure mathematics or my interests. Actual applications often start with pure mathematics. The history of mathematics can be seen as ever-increasing abstraction. The first abstraction shared by many animals may be abstraction of numbers. I recognize that there are similarities between the two apple collections and the two orange collections. This deep-shaped tautology applies to mathematics. The essence of mathematics enables and creates wisdom. Suppose there is another axiom, a rule based on mathematics. Is there an interaction of "chaotic edge" that is important for intelligence as well? Depending on the combination of axioms, complex dynamics such as our brain (or discolored silver color) may be generated, but many axioms generate self contradiction or structurally interesting system dynamics. There are actually closely related axioms, but they share the fundamental characteristics that enable very complex behavior. Our math is mathematics that creates complicated systems, intelligence of biology in nature, and silicon shell.

Rational, abstract and structured consideration on philosophy (Greek to Latin, philosophy, "love of wisdom"), the whole reality or basic aspects of human existence and experience. Philosophical exploration is a core element in the history of many civilizations The subject of philosophy is handled in many articles. Discussions on the main system of oriental philosophy are Buddhism, Chinese philosophy, Confucianism, Taoism, Hinduism, Indian philosophy, Jainism, Japanese philosophy, Shintoism, Sikhism For historical reports on Western philosophy, please refer to Western philosophy. Discussions on philosophy on the main religious traditions of the West refer to Christianity: Christian philosophy, Islam: Islamic philosophy, Judaism: Jewish philosophy. Discussions on the West's main schools, exercise, and systems refer to atomism, analysis philosophy, European philosophy, deconstructionism, existentialism, idealism, phenomenology, empiricism, postmodernism, pragmatism, the world view Please give me. Realism; Shihlin; skepticism; stoic school; Utilitarianism Regarding the biography of the main philosopher of the West and the handling of the movement related thereto, Aristotle and Aristotleism, Rene Descartes and Descartesism, Epicurean and Epicureanism, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel and Hegelism, Immanuel · Kant and Kantism, Karl Marx and Marxism, Plato and Platonism, Pythagoras and Pythagoreanism In order to cover a specific field of Western philosophy, referring to aesthetics, epistemology, ethics, thought, logic, metaphysics, biological philosophy, educational philosophy, historical philosophy, philosophy of language, philosophy of logic, philosophy of mathematics, philosophy of philosophy Please give me. Philosophy Philosophy, Religious Philosophy, Philosophy of Science Metaphysics 234 Philosophy of the Mind 191 Philosophy of the Language 172 Epistemology 160 Normative Ethics 139 Philosophy of the 17th and 18th Century 107 Philosophy of Society and Politics 102 General Philosophy of Science 94 Logic and Logic Philosophy 92 Philosophy of Ancient Greece 64 Philosophy of Ancient Greece 64 Philosophy 56 Philosophy of Cognitive Science 56 Religious Philosophy 47 Application Ethics 44 Behavior Philosophy 43 Philosophy of the 20th Century 42 Biological Philosophy 38 Philosophy of the 19th Century 37 Decision Theory 31 Philosophy of the Law 28 Philosophy of the Mainland 25 Philosophy of the Mainland 25 Philosophy of the RMB 25 Social Philosophy 21 Stochastic Philosophy 19 Sex, Race, Sex Philosophy 17 Philosophy of the Middle Ages and the Renaissance 17 Asia's Philosophy 10 Computing and Information Philosophy 2 American Philosophy 2 Africa / Africa's Philosophy 2 The subjects chosen for consideration are: political philosophy, economics and economic philosophy, education and educational philosophy, natural philosophy, social philosophy, and scientific philosophy of the 20th century. These different sub-disciplines are intertwined not only with the application of philosophy, but also basically with the mainstream of philosophical thinking. Why include economics and economic philosophy in education and educational philosophy? In addition to the development of independent natural sciences, the same applies to natural philosophy.

Learning is the cornerstone of American society. It brought society an era of economic darkness, religious resurgence and social instability. Learning has been controversial in the context of learning how to start with human development. As rationalists like Plato and Descartes argue, the results of learning nature are moving towards nature. (Bee & Boyd, 2007), it is deeply rooted in the concept of rational educational perspective ("knowledge is born"). On the other hand, you have an experientist who believes that learning is something that someone has to teach to children, like John Rock. It is natural for most people that children are born to become self-centered. Every teacher learned Piaget 's cognitive development theory. The children are learning, they can not be blamed or judged. But sitting there and listening to the reaction of some children, I felt the pain of my mother's daily struggle. We often feel unevaluated and much of what we are doing may be overlooked. We may think that our children exist only to satisfy our needs, they may not be expressed directly, but their actions are clearly illustrated Two well-known cognitive psychologists, Jean Piaget and Lev Vygotsky, developed a theory to tackle cognitive development and childhood and adolescent learning. Although there are similarities between the two theories, there are important differences to understand and apply the theory in the educational environment. In this lesson we will focus on these major differences. Well, we seem to have different opinions here. Although there may be no right or wrong cognitive development theory, there should be a difference between Piaget's cognitive development theory and Lewy's cultural history theory. In this lesson, we identify these similarities and differences. One of the main theories of cognitive development is psychologist Jean Piaget. This theory is often used for psychology and child development. The main premise of Piaget's theory is that children experience cognitive development in various stages. All of them are different from each other and are affected by nature and culture. These stages are based on age, and development in childhood has two stages. The preoperative phase (2-7 years old) is characterized by the fact that children can not yet use logical reasoning (perform logical operations) other forms that infer a false conclusion; this stage Are also characterized by children tending to show selfishness and they can not see the world from their own perspective.

The appearance and reality appearance and reality have never been drawn as a big difference like Hamlet. Fraud moves freely throughout the game, affecting all characters and causing torture and confusion for everyone. Three complicated characters use betrayal because of their advantages because they create an appearance to carry out the plan, but their obscured thoughts prevent them from carrying them . All of the tragedies of Shakespeare are filled with delusions, false characters, but none deceive as much as Hamlet. The appearance of "Hamlet" is one of the central themes of Shakespeare's "Hamlet". The role of role in the play is the role of the hidden character - in fact the murderer and looter Claudius plays a role of sad brother and legitimate king, in her son's view Gertrude's Adultery plays a role she is the "most harmful woman" who plays the role of "the most beautiful queen". Even Hamlet himself played a crazy role in his attempt. Philosophical problems in Bertrand Russell's "appearance and reality" The approach to his subject in Bertrand Russell's "philosophical problems" involves Descartes' fundamental skepticism, in which the author cancels all previous assumptions It was. Certain reality and existence. In the first chapter, Russell 's quest for reality in reality compared to reality starts with observation of his surroundings. For example, I checked the form and he confirmed it The reality and fantasy from the appearance of Hamlet Shakespeare plays, Hamlet, ghosts, phantoms may be fantasies. Therefore, from the beginning Shakespeare presents an unreliable atmosphere with unnaturalness, it drives the actions of the drama, and as a struggle to clarify what is considered absolutely and what the reality is, to the hero It has developed. Therefore, Hamlet's idea became the core strength of the drama through the one hour story to choose the appearance and reality of yellow wallpaper, the direction of confrontation. These effects vary by occupation and may include happiness, sadness, anger or shock. Even authors trying to achieve the same effect can do it in very different ways. This article describes three short stories that shock the reader, but each uses a different approach to achieve that effect. And the story of Kate Chopin Hamlet's appearance and reality Hamlet is composed mainly of various opposing powers. One of these forces is the difference between appearance and reality, in other words the difference between appearance and reality. What is it, just how does it look like? I can see that Hamlet has made two main perspectives on this issue. First of all, there is a big difference between inner emotions and external emotions, and between them. In other words, it is useful for this task. "MLM of appearance and reality," William Shakespeare's "Hamlet" in "Hamlet" has revealed a consistent theme of apparent and reality in the overall role behavior. In many cases, but it seems so that there is sincerity and honesty, in fact, dishonesty and deception is usually the true intentions of personality. Specifically, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern, Hamlet and Claudius proved a discontinuity between appearance and reality. In the play, these characters

Introduction of creationism and evolution 1. Definition 5. Variation of creationism 7. Evolutionary research Historical conflict 2. Controversy 5. Conclusion Appendix Work quotation Introduction Creation and evolution seen from historical significance Continuous conflict among people There is, it leads people to discuss and ban people. In many religious cultures and schools evolutionary theories are influenced by this anti-cultural way, creationism seems to be in various forms. Evolution theory and evolution theory explain the fact. Creationism is a myth that explains the facts. Evolutionism is proved by facts, creationism is a story about facts. It is always interesting to learn about science and religion, but it is interesting to understand that science produces facts and that all creationists (religions) can be discussed through evolution theory. Therefore evolutionists provided evidence and creationists tried many other thinkers who used scientific theories empirically inferred to challenge Galileo, Copernicus, Bacon, Descartes, and the Biblical hypothesis I will try to. . The Catholic Church called this ideology of creationism as heresy and thus has a bad habit of suppressing complete disarray of the Bible to some extent. For centuries the scientific research has evolved into the theory of big bang and evolution, although it is mainly such a place. Since the publication of Charles Darwin 's Origins of Origin, people have discussed creationism and evolution. By supporting facts and assertions, evolution is defended as more than just a theory, which proves to be a fact. - Because he is made in the final state, a person can not evolve to another state. He is made according to the image and image of his father, so you do not need to evolve; therefore there is no sign of evolution from the beginning. Since sin entered the world, people have been fooled to believe that there is evolution Evolutionism and creative evolution theory are based on science and more detailed evidence, creationism is a belief based theory. It is by no means convincing, it is a factor influencing ideas and theory supported by scientists. Therefore, you can not truly compare one; you need to choose what you think you are the truth at the same time. There has been a confusing problem since the beginning of human life ... an explosion can not produce life. I believe that anyone who has seen pictures of Hiroshima and Nagasaki immediately after the other two very explosions will support me there. Through research of scientific evidence we can decide that Genesis is the only possible and provable explanation for the existence of the world and life.

The Importance of Self For centuries people have tried to find answers to their questions about their causes and their meanings. The problem is as follows. Where did the idea of ​​self come from? 'A lot of discussion is advocated in our society. Many philosophers are trying to find solutions to these problems, but these problems are far more complicated than we think and seem to be incomplete. Descartes, one of the most famous philosophers, spent a lot of time analyzing the existence of human beings and the idea of ​​self. Many of our research on self has focused on the importance of self-esteem. This attribute of self is important to understanding self, but it may be doubtful whether it is the most important. In this article, I will explain the importance of self expression as one of many attributes of self. Self expression is an attempt to influence the general public's perception of creating a specific self image. Individual goals and beliefs will affect the type of impression they are about to portray to others. Social expectation is an important element for creating this self expression (Schlenker and Leary, 1982). Goffman (1959) describes self expression as a way for individuals to try to create positive and attractive peer ratings. He suggested that people take various actions in public places and try to treat people around them with a positive attitude. The purpose of his report is to define self-management and self-motivation. This article is about the importance of self-motivation and self-management in my learning. Motivation leads to individual behavior and is one of the factors leading it (Stoner, 2006). . Self motivation is important as it helps us achieve the goals we set for ourselves and helps us understand our strengths and weaknesses. As motivation rises, people believe that they will succeed at university. This is the importance of self-management. Therefore, you can infer that self-study and self-management are important in university. These two things need sustainability as well as implementation. It helps you to test your success through colorful college life. None of them will have a significant impact on you.

The 17th century was the beginning of the era of scientific progress known as the scientific revolution in Europe. It is this stage that use of reason and new progress of science brought about a paradigm shift. Paradigm shift is a change in the basic assumption (example) arising from discovering new information that is no longer compatible with existing paradigms and forcing them to change the framework of thought to accommodate new hypotheses . With the development of ideas such as Francis Bacon (1561-1627), the scientific community has undergone a major change. British philosopher and politician Bacon abandoned classical deductive methods of natural understanding from Aristotle but instead adopted experimental induction method. He rejects traditional authority and provides "experiments and induction methods that seem to provide absolutely reliable means to distinguish truth from mistakes". {4} Science was anxious to find it that later became a source of Western trust. For example, the invention of the telescope has resulted in the destruction of Aristotle's cosmology. There, the earth and man himself were central. Aristotle teaches that the universe is a series of concentric spheres, one outside the other. Historian James Turner said: "Copernicus and his successor broke the world. Between 1500 and 1700, the way people in Europe understand and understand the world has changed dramatically and dramatically. Through the work of thinkers such as Francis Bacon, Galileo Galilei, Johannes Kepler, Rene Descartes, Isaac Newton etc., the Western world experienced the scientific revolution. It shifted from a world view dominated by church and Christian theology and ethics to a mechanically-like material world of inanimate controlled by the power of nature and precise mathematical rules (Capra and Luisi, 2014a). Hume is an avid believer in the scientific method advocated by Francis Bacon, Galileo Galilei (1564-1642) and Sir Isaac Newton (1643-1727). However, applying the induction problem to science shows that all science is actually based on logical error. The so-called induction error points out that even if something has happened in the past, even if it occurs frequently, it can not be assumed to happen again. But this is the basis of the scientific method and Hume is forced to draw conclusions and it seems insufficient that the scientific method appears to be effective even if delay is applied.

British philosophers established an empiric school. Locke was born on August 29, 1632 in the village of Wrington, Somerset State. He was educated at Oxford University from 1661 to 1664 and taught Greek, rhetoric and moral philosophy at Oxford University. In 1667 Rock started working with him. British politician Anthony Ashley Cooper, the first count of Shaftesbury, Rock is his friend, consultant and doctor. Shaftesbury received a series of minor government appointments for Locke. In 1669, Locke went to France after losing power at the liberal Shaftesbury in 1675, in one of his official status. Written by George M. Stevens, "John Rock: His America and Carolina Heritage" provides a basic but exhaustive basis for the rock ideological origin in the context of his biography event did. It emphasizes the role of ownership in the philosophy of rock and over the years it provides broad prospects for the views of the US, and in particular the US Supreme Court. This document was created by Mr. Rock and his leader, Lord Shaftesbury, which is intended to be used as the Constitution of the state of Carolina in the UK but has never been officially adopted. British, John Rock. John Rock had a philosophical influence on both political theory and theoretical philosophy, and this influence was reflected in the concept of the period between 1789 and 1914 and the concept of human rights equality. John Locke's work has influenced the work of multiple diplomats on freedom and social contract between the society and the government. Rock 's human and power ideology is the foundation of the concept of power separation. As an enlightening thinker, John Locke wrote two articles. John Rock and John Stuart Mill's Freedom Definition John Rock thinks that humans should have more freedom in political society than John Stuart Mill. John Roc's "Second Paper of Government" and John Stuart Mill's "Freedom of Expression" outlines the conceptual framework of ideal nations of each thinker, but influential and powerful literature It is a work. Two different views on human nature and its freedom are proposed. About how John Locke and John Stuart Mill take different views John Locke John Locke was born in Somerset, England on August 29, 1632, is a British philosopher and political theorist. Rock was educated at the Oxford Christian church, where he followed traditional classical courses and gained a medical degree with a focus on medicine and science studies, but the interest in philosophy was awakened again by Descartes' research It was. Then he joined the family of Anthony Ashley Cooper and later became the Count of Shaftesbury who was a private doctor at first.

Energy is known for its long tradition and thought to be part of Japanese culture, but due to their cast, medieval Japanese rhythm of the 14th and 16th centuries, most of today Japanese people do not like this drama. . Modern Japanese users do not understand and they lack penetration into the entertainment community. However, by understanding dramatic plots such as Ise-Monogatari, Genji Monogatari, Heike Monogatari, you can gain enjoyment and gratitude performance as an intermediary between God and man (Handout 14). . Enlightenment (or called enlightenment or rational period) is a traditional intellectual movement that began in Europe in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, emphasizing reasons and individualism rather than tradition. Its purpose is to reform the usage of reason in that area based on experimental thinking of rehearsals and beliefs, and advanced vision to transcend logical methods. It promotes logical beliefs, skepticism and intellectual communication. It challenges superstition and intolerance and is the most popular goal of the Catholic Church. Okay, men and girls, ready to enlightenment In this lesson I will introduce enlightenment. what is that? Enlightenment, sometimes called the era of enlightenment, was an intellectual movement from the late 17th century to the early 18th century, emphasizing reasons, individualism, and skepticism. Enlightenment challenged the traditional religious view. Because that was such a wide movement, enlightenment did not have an accurate start date. It did not pop up, but it gradually developed. Most historians came to the beginning of enlightenment from the mid 17th century to the beginning of the 18th century. The work of intellectuals like Rene Descartes, Barus Spinoza, Isaac Newton is particularly important for the creation of enlightenment. Another important moment in the development of Western culture is enlightenment. Enlightenment was an intellectual movement that took place from the end of the 17th century to the beginning of the 19th century. Enlightenment emphasized the contents of reason, science and skepticism. The attitude and values ​​we have today are mainly products of enlightenment. In particular, Thomas Jefferson was deeply influenced by Enlightenmentism, the ideal of the Enlightenment the foundation of the American government.

Changes in the revolution process Until the beginning of 1792, the French Revolution proceeded smoothly and the amount of bloodshed related to the severity of several incidents was relatively small. However, Austria declared war in April 1792, and the case in France improved. Due to further pressure on already declining economies and increased demand for public support, the government has to take more thorough measures to try to rule the country. In the process of industrial revolution, the role of government has undergone major changes. Rather, the idea that the government should do something about the economy has changed. In the 1750s, the composition of the British parliament (the governing body) at the time when the industrial revolution was just under way in the UK reflected the main economic influence of those days. Even the King's House, despite its name, does not represent ordinary people, but reflects the power of wealth: unless they can prove that they possess a certain wealth, the UK is in parliamentary election We do not allow ballots of. Cavalier and middle class businessmen vote but farm workers and factory workers do not vote (see chapter 4) Many changes took place in the process of the industrial revolution. These changes are a way to improve people's living environment and meet their needs. These changes are largely political, social, and economic. When the Industrial Revolution began in 1700, people began to make new inventions. Excellent machines like Richard Arkwright need manpower to do it. This and other similar issues have transformed people in this country into cities to find work. When the city crowded with factory workers, the living environment started to deteriorate. The number of days is also very long, and treatment at work is very bad. These created new ideas for people like Mr. Mill, Marx, Engels and people took a step to meet their requirements. The labor union began to be formed, the state has finally entered and must recognize the needs of the workers. They enacted laws to ensure that labor abuse does not occur again. Throughout history, many revolutions have occurred. All these revolutions influenced people's lives and changed the flow of human history. Whether introducing new mathematical ideas or failing to establish the right government, everyone will somehow be affected by these revolution. Two specific revolutions, the Science Revolution and the French Revolution, have had both positive and negative impacts on people's lives. The scientific revolution is defined as a major change in European thought and since the mid 16th century research on nature has been characterized by careful observation and doubts of accepted beliefs. One reason for this revolution was Francis Bacon and Descartes' new ideas and beliefs. In the past, people believed everything that was thought to be true. Francis Bacon began to urge him to call it "observation and experimental" empiricism ".

Skepticism is concerned with people 's belief if this person can really trust their own senses. As the creator of Plato, Descartes, Matrix, there is no evidence that the five senses of humans have not changed, so the possibilities of human beings deceiving are expressed in their writings and movies. I am thinking all the senses. There is no evidence that the whole world is genuine, but people have to trust their feelings to believe it. However, these senses of sight, smell, sound, etc. may be deceived. Please compare the fable of Plato's cave with the movie 'Matrix'. The fable of the cave is one of the most famous works of Greek philosopher Plato. This fable is a human extension that is portrayed as a visual through their only body and things. In the fable allegory, Plato wants to show that reality reality is not necessarily the case. From childhood, a group of prisoners was locked in the cave, each prisoner is tying head together ...... Fable analysis of Plato's cave in Plato's cave in the cave, readers are clever A metaphor is set up. Some people think that it has nothing to do with today's society. However, the prisoners trapped in this cave today represent Americans in our country. In our lives, sometimes we can face the walls of his own cave completely, forgetting the truth of our country and the world around us. TOK essay cave and queue fable On December 3, 2010, many people thought that what we knew was not true. This idea became clear through the story of "Cave Fables" and the movie "Matrix". The movie and the story are similar (Matrix is ​​said to be based on The Allegory), you can compare the major plots of both. In the cave fable, people were bound to the legs and neck in the cave, facing the walls. Fable of the cave from ~ In his book 'Republic' in February 2013 Plato tried to explain justice through different conversations with Socrates and other people. He explained how to live a fair life, what kind of fair society should be, and how to take leadership only. One of the arguments he used to explain justice is the four phases of philosophy education. He portrayed them through dialogue between Socrates and Glaucon at dinner.

Novel "Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde's strange incident" centered on the concept of humanity, but until the last chapter, when the complete story of Jekyll and Hyde's relationship became clear, the theme was completely I did not show up. . Therefore, for the first time after witnessing all the events of the novel including Hyde's sin and his ultimate eclipse, we can clearly face the prospect of dual humanity. This text not only considers the duality of mankind as its central theme but also thinks about the characteristics of this duality and forces us to consider plots of each novel. There are many types of duality designed to best deal with various aspects of puzzles. For example, it is thought that Descartes dualism is one of the oldest forms of material dualism, that both substances and non-material substances exist and consciousness exists in non-material substances. Another theory, attribute dualism, considers consciousness to be an unimportant attribute resulting from the same thing as creating physical attributes. Attribute dualists believe that neural activity has both physical and nonphysical properties. Physical properties include substances such as electromagnetic potential and nonphysical properties include substances such as consciousness It is widely regarded as two pioneers of contemporary dualism, material dualism and material dualism. Material dualism thinks that mind and soul are different nonphysical entities from human forms, whereas material dualism thinks that there is no difference between soul and body. ) Material dualism leaves some room in the position that the soul may exist separately from the body before and after the death. It allows the causal relationship psychological and physical relationships to work together, but property dualism does not allow this concept. The cause of the event can be described as a physical event in the brain and as other events as desire, emotion or thought. However, material dualism has been increasingly ignored in most modern discussions.

The Spaniard Donja Josefa Ortiz de Dominguez, a patriot of Mexico and the main character of the Mexican independence war, became famous in history due to their courage. It all began with the conspiracy of Queretaro, once condemned, and impaired the revolutionary plan of the Mexican revolution. Under the skill of Miguel Dominguez and his wife Dona Joseph Ortiz (to become an independent heroin), the leader pretends to be a literacy academy. The plan included the formation of major cities, the meeting endorsed the nonconformity with the Spanish royal family, rejected the new Spanish idea under France, declared independence at the same time, kicked out the peninsula, kicked out the peninsula as a governor, Fernandez VII Approve, and each state will hold a rally JosefaOrtízdeDominguez is a brave, decisive and legendary actress of Mexican independence movement, admired, praised and admired by 8 generations of Mexican people. Without timely warning about her pastor turning into a revolutionary Miguel Hidalgo and his companion in mid September 1810, the independence movement may be postponed for many years. But despite Joseph's longstanding reputation, we do not know very much about her parents, the year she was born, or her first twenty years. From genuine paintings and paintings, Joseph knows that it is her fairy tale, but it automatically leads her to a 10% elite of the Mexican population. Her parents Juan José Ortiz and Manuela Girón de Ortiz died soon after her birth. Joseph was brought up by her sister. After receiving education at the famous Colegio de las Vizcainas, I graduated in 1791 and married Miguel Dominguez. They went to Queretaro where the husband was assigned to the duties. Queretaro is the main venue for independence movement and Joseph plays his historical role in the right place. Joseph has a pure Spanish lineage, but like many Creole elites she despises the Spaniards born in Spain and they show a very arrogant attitude towards Creole. Her anti - Spanish attitude also comes from her participation in the literary circle. On that day, privileged Creole organization was custom. They smuggled the works of Voltaire, Rousseau and Descartes, they were banned by the church and made intense debate. These literary societies soon became political society. The most important is Queretaro.

In the "nature of true virtue" of Jonathan Edwards, the pursuit of God's supreme belief leads to selflessness of moral beauty, nature's virtue, and true virtue. Newton's belief in the logic is a perfect nature and a belief in their human morals. The important thing Edwards wrote in his sermon is that he believes that when he truly follows the path of God he will achieve an aesthetic morality. In the 18th century Francis Bacon and enlightenment philosopher Descartes, Newton, Rock, Wollaston, Berkeley were introduced to British and American colonies. The two Native American Americans Samuel Johnson and Jonathan Edwards were first influenced by these philosophers; then they adjusted their own understanding to develop their own American theology and philosophy I expanded it. Both were the first appointed Puritan congregation minister who accepted the majority of new learning of enlightenment. Both schools were educated at Yale University and the idealists influenced by Berkeley became influential university presidents. Both influence the development of American political philosophy and the work of the father who founded. However, Edwards' improved Puritan theology was based on the teachings of Calvinism, and Johnson converted to the Bishop religion of the British Church (England church), and then in his William Worston natural religion his new American Moral philosophy was established. Edwards was born in 1703 to the family of a famous judicial pastor in East Windsor, Connecticut. In 1716, Edwards read Newton and Rock at Yale University and began to read "Notes of the Heart" and "Notes of Natural Science". The epistemology of rock, the philosophy of language, and the philosophy of psychology are profound. However, Edwards' metaphysics seems to be affected by Mahler and Cambridge Platonist, and it is similar to Rock. After a short service congregation in New York and Bolton in Connecticut, Edwards returned to Yale where he completed his Master's degree and became a senior lecturer in 1724. In 1725, the Northampton church chose Edwards as a replacement for grandfather's Solomon Stoddard - the so-called "Pope in Connecticut Valley". This year's revival, the latter is called big awake. Edwards, Jonathan (1703-1758): Jonathan Edwards was the most influential theologian in American religious history and helped begin the first big awakening. His irony was enthusiastic in his passionate sermon in 1741, "a sinner in the hands of angry gods", but he is a congregation missionary with a gentle sermon. For more information on Jonathan Edwards, please click here. Eight ways: As the climax of the four Holy Spirit in Buddhism, it represents a journey from pain to murder. It is divided into three parts: wisdom (right opinion and right intent), morality (correct speech, correct action and right life) and concentration (right effort, right correct idea and correct concentration). It is also known as "Middleweight" (Prothero 2008: 189-190)

William Black, a poet who believes strongly in the power of the heart, wrote that "When you look at it with imagination, you can see indefinitely." A romantic poet uses imagination when staring at nature. Please feel at infinity. William Wordsworth expresses the calm natural beauty and the calming effect. Samuel Taylor Coleridge, one of the poetry genius of this era, uses nature and his imagination to create a surreal atmosphere. The mind never seeks excitement and fear. This is not a natural thing. Peace is the natural state of the mind. Due to our ideas and specific circumstances and how we respond to stimuli, we create 'battles' in our heads, sometimes we forget to close the movie. At that time, my heart continued just because we let go. 43 minutes later, the train pulled up the home and I got on the train. The crowd is calm because most people are in the train or in Venice. After crossing the bridge between Mestre and the lagoon, I entered the station and a few seconds later I headed back to the Grand Canal with a gondola, a water taxi, or a police car. Philosophy of the heart is a field of philosophy to study the essence of the mind. Although other problems such as difficulty of consciousness and the nature of a particular state of mind are solved, the problem of mind and body is a paradigm in the philosophy of the mind. The spiritual aspects of this research include psychological events, psychological functions, psychological attributes, consciousness, the existence theory of mind, the essence of thinking, the relationship between the mind and the body. Dualism and monism are two central ideas about mind and body, and although there are minor differences, they are not perfectly suited to either one. Dualism is present in both the East and the West tradition (Hindu philosophy and Plato's Sankhya and yoga school), but its entry into the Western philosophy is due to the 17th century René Descartes

For me, imagining a more horrible idea is more than letting me think about all the elements of the knowledge I think can actually be considered uncertain. Reneekecart began doing this in his most famous work called "First Philosophy of Contemplation"; Descartes realized that his beliefs used every day of his day are flawed, he Began pursuing a fundamentalistic knowledge framework that enabled to develop certainty from beliefs. In 1717, French engineer Hubert Gautier wrote a paper on the construction of the bridge, the construction of the bridge began the transition from art to science. In 1847, an American named Squire Whipple wrote "Bridge Construction Work". This includes the first analysis method to calculate the stress and strain of the bridge. "Consulting Bridge Engineering" is a civil engineering major in the 1880s. Most highway girder bridges are made of concrete and steel. Romans used concrete made of lime and volcanic ash (red, volcanic powder) in their bridges. This material solidifies quickly in water, it is strong and waterproof. In the Middle Ages of Europe, lime mortar was used instead, but it was water soluble. Today 's popular Portland cement, a special mixture of limestone and clay, was invented by British bricklayer named Joseph Aspdin in 1824, but it was not widely used as a base material until the early 20 th century. How can a civil engineer build a bridge? There are five different types of bridges in our world: cantilevered bridges, suspension bridges, arch bridges, beam bridges and truss bridges. Before civil engineers build bridges, they must examine the geographical features of their potential places - they detect enough hard earth and rock to support the metal pillars of the bridge. These civil engineers used their yellow helmets and goggles to protect their eyes and applied geotechnical calculations on their clipboard to measure the potential benefits and failures of dirt on the bridge . Once the inspection is completed, the civil engineer can drill the soil using bulldozer and asphalt equipment. Cables, girders and concrete are different materials for building bridges and two natural forces called compression and tension maintain the structure of the bridge-resistant bridge. Are you still confused? What happens when one hand releases the bowl?

Ghosts of resurrection Descartes dualism is replaced mainly by empirical theory of mind. At the center of this development is the criticism of Gilbert Lyle against a pointless "ghost" living in the physical "machine" of the body. A metaphysical self is incredible, even if it is trustworthy, and its performance in phenomenal experiences is not known to others. The failure of this approach occurs when the existence of physics is recognized as incredibly as the existence of metaphysics. To be frank, the problem of Capotes of Kansas is a plot. The story centers around the resurrection of past ghosts who visited Nelle and Truman late at night. But that's it. I will write more about what they encounter with ghosts, but in fact there is nothing to say. For Nelle, the ghost returned her suffering to the destruction of her novel Truman, while Powers rumored about Nelle's identity as Robin to kill her to explain why she felt pain I used it. On the other hand, Truman believes that ghosts will seek revenge there for the cold blood, but despite this Truman continues his delusive delusions. First of all, the guardian is a zombie. There is no way to cancel this. Fate begins by finding a corpse in the rusted shell of a car on a highway where the ghosts were destroyed by the end of the world and reviving it as guardian of your play. As long as the ghost itself is not destroyed, ghosts can revive the guardian. The guardian is an undefined undead warrior who has flames and light. Secondly, the fallen people, one of the enemy races of the game, were named after their being once liked by travelers, then abandoned them and destroyed their civilization. They may be destroyed in the darkness of the traveler's enemies. Now, they are desperately looking for abandoned technology to find traces of their power. If these battles go wrong, it will escape and give up the fate of their worshipers. When the game began, the ghost was looking for old Russian shards until it found and resurrected the guards of the player who was killed in the ancient war. The ghost guided the security guards to the ship, and they carried it to the tower. So they met the speakers and introduced them to the dark. Then the guardian's mission is to find nearby space launch locations that resist humans that humans begin to invade into outer space, avoid collapsing enemies, and eventually are confined to be trapped in the moon was. The Guardian found an ancient Russian warmind called Rasputin. This is artificial intelligence made to protect the earth. In addition, Guardian tracks the code, upgrades the old array, connects it to colonies that have been lost for a long time in the solar system, and discovers that Rasputin is controlling the array. Then they started for the moon and looked for missing security guards and the guards were looking for ways to enter the nest box fortress.

What is the gravity law? According to Wikipedia, gravity or gravity is a natural phenomenon, all bodies are magnetized to each other. It is most commonly used as a substance that weighs substances and causes them to fall to the ground as they fall from height. The Newton equation first appeared in Philosophia Naturals Principia Mathematica in July 1687. It describes how Apple fell from the tree. Regardless of whether the apple can actually land like a story, this equation represents why you can be rooted in the ground, represents something that fixes the earth in the orbit around the sun, and people in the moon It is used by NASA engineers to send. . In general relativity, Einstein published a new law on gravity, pointed out that gravity is not a common force in Newton's theory of gravity but part of inertia. His law of gravity does not mean "appeal" but simply means traversing the trajectory, indicating the behavior of objects in the gravitational field such as the planet. For Einstein, gravity is a part of inertia. The movement of stars and planets is derived from their inertial derivatives, and the crossover orbital used is determined by the spatial distance characteristics, more precisely the continuous time and space. Today, Newton's law of three movements - the law which describes the law of motion of object in this world and the law of universal gravity of Newton - the law which describes the law of force, gravity, mass etc in the universe is most important It is considered a physical chapter. He also studied the nature of the light, he introduced the reflecting telescope, and he also produced calculus and others. Galileo Galilei: A famous Italian scholar, also known as the world's most famous physicist, astronomer, engineer, philosopher and mathematician, Galileo Galilei was born on 15th February 1564. He is a major player of the scientific revolution - the emergence of modern science and the largest astronomer in science history. Sir Isaac Newton (1642-1727) is a very important person in the science of developing countries. His discovery of the law of gravity shows that humans can understand nature. Humanity will never be at the mercy of the unknown world any longer. "The laws of nature and the laws of nature are hidden in the night, God is said to be" Newton! "Everything is easy. "{10} John Rock (1632-1704) Another major thinker of Age of Enlightenment. Historian Norman Hampton said, "New thinking trends seem to be flowing together." {11} Rock believes that the knowledge gained through experience is better than the knowledge accepted by faith and trust - as he says, "Brain the opinions of others" as he says. {12} He rejected the theory of natural thought taught by Descartes, and our idea started with a blank sheet of paper, believing that knowledge increased through experience.

Influence of Aristotle's scopostury on Darwin's mechanical evolution theory Since the birth of biology, understanding biological needs is a scientific goal that has been pursued by people. History shows that Aristotle and Charles Darwin are among the most powerful biologists ever. Aristotle's objective approach has been widely endorsed and has a history of more than 2000 years. One scientist commented that Aristotle's theory of purpose is "a ghost all the time, it is a mystery of unknown cause that has tormented biology throughout history" (Ayala, 10). Darwin abandoned the last trace of Aristotle's thought on biological evolution. The current explanation no longer exists. According to "grand design", the evolution of life on Earth will no longer evolve; it will not be the ultimate cause. Instead, interest in random mutations has increased, and it is promoted by natural selection. Humans are agents and ... the center of impulsive activities - "scopos theory" activity ... looking ... concrete and objective non-personal ending. ... He likes effective work and hates wasteful efforts. He understands the function and efficiency of the service, and the shortcomings of uselessness, waste, incompetence. Process Instinct In the present era, for some people the words "evolution" and "god" may seem unlikely to become bedclothes (see Scoposteri). This is primarily because today's biologist rejects the visual view of evolution and is shifting to a more mechanical perspective. It is generally thought that the process of refusal began with Descartes and reached Darwin's theory of evolution through natural selection. The basic idea of ​​natural selection is the idea of ​​changing through a common lineage. This means that all living things are related to one another; for the two species, looking backwards, we see that they are descendants of a common ancestor. This is a totally different view of Aristotle's great existence chain, where each species is formed separately, its own purpose and place is in nature, and the seed does not evolve into new. It is a seed. Evolution by natural selection is a purely mechanical change theory, and it does not affect purpose consciousness and designers. There is essentially no vision or purpose, and it does not mean that one species is more perfect than the others. Only the pressure of choice from the environment will bring about change

Skepticism believes that there is no way to prove that things exist outside of us. As skeptics think that we can not distinguish between dreams and reality, I think the real thing is probably the creation of our thoughts, and we think that it is like the brain sitting in a big bucket It's simple. Let's connect to the machine to simulate the perfect performance in reality, let's live the "brain" in it 1 An excerpt from the same-name article "certificate of the outside world", GE I examined some responses to the skeptical challenges presented in Part 2. In particular, we saw four answers: (1) Descartes Cogito, (2) GE. "Proof" to Moore's outside world, (3) Dretsk denies cognitive closure, and (4) David Lewis's contextualism. After considering the strengths and weaknesses of these proposed solutions, we review the question whether skepticism is so bad or not and draw a conclusion. This course concludes with a discussion of why we have the concept of knowledge. If there is no concept of knowledge we are accustomed to, what kind of life will it be? Does this gap in our cognitive economy affect widespread or is our life as generic as that? In order to better understand if the concept is important or important, we will consider what kind of life can exist without knowledge of knowledge. Moore 's "evidence of the outside world" was created for the purpose of the soul, aimed at solving the "philosophical scandal" of Immanuel Kant. Obviously not enough for Kant and other philosophers. I believe the belief he said is true common sense, I believe in existence, and many other examples of congenital knowledge. A new approach to protect Moore's common sense is also evident in his most famous thesis, the proof of the outside world (Moore 1939). Here, after considerable effort to understand the meaning of "external object" as "there is something that is not dependent on our experience", Moore said that the perfect idea of ​​the existence of such objects in this way It can be proved that it can prove it. The hand is "a CS proposition with a common meaning, use it according to this meaning, and the hand to be examined is enough to prove that the proposition is true - on the other hand there is certainly a hand The hand is matter matter, and matter matter is according to the usual meaning of "physical object" is an external object

Descartes' method consists of four rules, but two of them, especially Rule 1 are very important. In his first rule, he believes that if we have minimal doubt about the credibility of such things, we should not accept certain things. We have to analyze everything carefully by putting the reasons in everything and we need to avoid bias. We should not accept it as the truth if there is nothing clear in our head. To comply with this rule means that we can discover the truth of things; however, if for some reason we do not follow it it means that we do not trade things / knowledge with more uncertainty It hinders getting. David Frum of high obesity degree CNN said Americans are more likely to be obese than any other nationality other than Mexican. Some obese countries have imposed high tax on fast food and other high calorie foods and many believe that the US should impose a weight loss tax. According to Dictionary.com, obesity tax is "tax imposed or recommended on high-fat or other unhealthy foods". Taxing junk food can reduce obesity, but it is low Public health experts and scholars from many countries are calling for high taxes on unhealthy foods. The reason for implementing tax cuts is because people want to avoid dangerous feeding behavior and improve social health. Research indicates that the current epidemic of obesity is increasing due to the expansion of the fast food industry. The junk food store will change the diet of the local community and set up a traditional restaurant that will affect the health of obesity, diabetes, heart disease. Since smoking tobacco has lowered tobacco tax, it is required to increase weight loss taxes to reduce consumption of unhealthy food in more countries. The food industry sells products containing a lot of fat, salt, sugar, calories and cholesterol. There is a clear link between these foods and obesity, diabetes, coronary heart disease, hypertension, stroke, and cancer. Companies that manufacture high calorie, high fat foods are responsible for selling products that are known to have health risks. Responsibility for obesity and other diet-related diseases is not related to the food industry but to individuals. It is well known which foods are high in calories and fat. As we all know, these foods should be eaten moderately, not excessively. When they are overconsumed, they often have health problems related to diet therapy. If they eat moderately, they will not. Therefore, responsibility for low responsibility lies with consumers, not producers.

Original story: René Descartes, expected crisis at the end of a thousand years, said, "I think so, so I am," he said it can no longer apply. This is largely due to major technological progress since this statement was formulated in the 17th century. In fact, "I am because I have the skill", "Because my God says so, I can say that it is accurate explanation of the modern era. For more than a year, the world's technology media has speculated that Apple "reinvents" smartphones on the occasion of the original iPhone's 10th anniversary. Expectation is high, Apple is under pressure. As the company that has the world's deepest pocket and invented modern smartphone, the iPhone is almost a modern purpose, the iPhone will always be the leader in the design and technology market. Yesterday, Apple announced two different iPhones, iPhone 8 and iPhone X ("10"). IPhone 8 is basically an iPhone 7S, because it keeps 7 basic design and technology and adds only hardware and software upgrade. On the other hand, iPhone X is advertised as if it were a future mobile phone, super high end OLED display and 22 th century Starship Communicator equipped with borderless design. Apple announced the long-awaited iPhone X (pronounced "10" instead of "ex") on the 10th anniversary of the original iPhone. This borderless smartphone with glass case is unlocked with face recognition technology and charged wirelessly. The price of the basic model is 999 dollars, it is the most expensive iPhone ever. Does iPhone X change the rules of the game, or is it just a very expensive and stylish pocket computer? This is what a technical writer said after yesterday spending a bit of time with Apple X about the actual event hosted by Apple. When Netflix began to implement its own content program in addition to "House of Cards", "Arrested Development", it will revive the 4th season and is the long-awaited "original" series. The series by Mitch Hurwitz is a serious hit television program, but I have never seen enough ratings to continue for over three seasons of Fox. Various comments were introduced in the fourth quarter, and some people criticized the composition of the program. This is mainly because the performers of the program could not appear at the same time. In his interview, Sarandos said it was "fair criticism" and "actors often did not appear on the screen."

Fichte's personality theory theme Fichte's Wissenschaftslehre clearly has no other spiritual philosophy in extracting or reasoning personality theory. In addition, it has been proved possible to combine the important concepts of my essay with current neurophysiological thinking about how memory is memorized and retrieved. Therefore, this article will try to perform those wedding ceremonies. The first part of my Descartes' student world may be mentioned by Fichte's "cogito" statement "revision", "I am myself". In his earlier work "Wissenschaftslehre" (scientific theory, 1794), Fichte extended Kant's concept of human ethics to metaphysical pictures of the universe. Fichte rejects the concept of the object itself, simplifies reality to absolute mental prediction, and returns the mind itself to will. The reality standard becomes a practical standard: it is a reality, and beliefs and actions are right or good (the beginning of pragmatism). Fichte emphasized more than Kant that moral responsibility is the goal of life. When Kant criticized the position called Utilitarian later, he separated responsibility from his own interests, but Fichte reaffirms moral responsibility in the form of higher self-interest, and self-actualization is a temporary It was a realization. Kant's successor Johann Gottlieb Fichte assumed the creative self as the ultimate source of reality, which produced all the change and all knowledge. Fichte's theory is detailed in G. W. F. Hegel's absolute idealism. For Hegel, reality is an absolute spirit or rationality, which embodies the development of comprehensive self-consciousness from nature to the history of mankind. British Hegel FH Bradley believes that mediocre experiences are fragmentary and inconsistent and hence appearance; the reality, the absolute, the unified whole, the only absolute , Perhaps through cryptic experience

Evolution theory and evolution theory explain the fact. Creationism is a myth that explains the facts. Evolutionism is proved by facts, creationism is a story about facts. It is always interesting to learn about science and religion, but it is interesting to understand that science produces facts and that all creationists (religions) can be discussed through evolution theory. Therefore, evolutionists can infer that creationists are providing evidence that evolutionists are trying to prove that they are wrong. They want to argue that the problem of evolution (or what they call "evolution theory" or "Darwinism") and science is not religion but religion and religion (science). "The example comes from the lie of Ken Ham: evolution, but it is called" the cause, principle or system of faith related to enthusiasm and belief "(from Webster Quoted) as well as a deep misunderstanding evolution of two religions) dictionary. Humm's ridiculous argument differs from "contradiction-free biblical evidence", in the past can only study them and can not access directly, so deriving scientific conclusions from fossils and evidence is That means you can not. Written in the era of Kenam Evolution theory and evolution theory explain the fact. Creationism is a myth that explains the facts. Evolutionism is proved by facts, creationism is a story about facts. It is always interesting to learn about science and religion, but it is interesting to understand that science produces facts and that all creationists (religions) can be discussed through evolution theory. Therefore evolutionists provided evidence and creationists tried many other thinkers who used scientific theories empirically inferred to challenge Galileo, Copernicus, Bacon, Descartes, and the Biblical hypothesis I will try to. . The Catholic Church called this ideology of creationism as heresy and thus has a bad habit of suppressing complete disarray of the Bible to some extent. For centuries the scientific research has evolved into the theory of big bang and evolution, although it is mainly such a place.

Kierkegaard's fear and trembling are what people are. How do humans connect with God? Who am I? Why do I exist? I. The famous theologian of the 19th century Soeren Kierkegaard wrote "Fear and Trembling" in 1843 in response to Hegellism. Kierkegaard took over the pseudonym of Jonannes de Silentio and told the contemporary attitude towards doubt and belief. He believes that humans are deeply rooted in reason and doubt, but they are different from French mathematicians, scientists and philosophers Descartes. 087393 KIERKEGAARD: Fear and confusion Evans, C Stephen and Sylvia Walsh, editor. Kierkegaard's new translation of German universalist and idealists' challenge was discussed through exploring the story of Abraham and Isaac. Considering the many questions raised by stories about beliefs, moral obligations and sins, Kierkegaard concluded that belief is contradictory and irrational, 038480 philosophical fragment / Johannes Clarks , HOWARD V. and EDNAH. Oh, EDS. And TRANS. Kierkegaard, Soren Kierkegaard, written in a pseudonym of Johannes · climakas, compares the Christian paradox with Greek and modern philosophical thinking and is exploring the meaning of adventure beyond the understanding of Socrates' truth. 371 pgs. • 1985 Many of the philosophers who first read Kierkegaard, especially Johannes de Siledio's "Fear and tremor" often concluded that Kierkegaard supports sacred moral order. However, Soren Kierkegaard does not mean that morality was created by God (through his pseudonym Johannes de Silentio), but instead he will claim that God's command from God transcended morality. This difference means that God does not necessarily create human morality. However, any religiousist must prepare for the sacred orders of God. It takes precedence over all moral and rational obligations. Kierkegaard called this case a suspension of moral teleportation. Abraham, the knight of faith chose to obey God unconditionally and received his son, the title of his faith and father of faith. Abraham transcended ethics and jumped on faith

From the beginning, human behavior was as diverse as the change in the living environment around him. For centuries, human behavior was not explained and there was no room for doubt. Indeed, the brain was not thoroughly investigated and explained until the late 17th century. Until then, humans were respected by the essence of their souls. Philosopher René Descartes began exploring the concept of human "soul" and in 1637 wrote a book called "Methodology" to explain his philosophy. Among them, he mentioned his observations on how animals move and respond without the concept of soul. What is the best way to understand the brain? Brain, every brain. If there is no theory to tell what to look for, many people think that the answer is "record all." Because each neuron clearly excludes our brain. Under about 86 billion neurons, understanding our brains is far from understanding the quantum color mechanics for my cat and works. Therefore, we need to aim for something, some creatures, moderate brain Before you develop an unforgettable tone you need to understand the oldest and lowest part of the brain: the marginal cortex, or many experts will be able to understand the "lizard brain", "crocodile's brain" or " Dinosaur's brain ". A part of the brain helps us to quickly judge if something is dangerous or relevant, and how we should deal with new things. This is our first line of defense and we control our battle and escape behaviors. At the time of pitching, the Airbnb team quickly addressed some concerns investors may have about their business model. The second slide explains why you book Airbnb, not the biggest competitor (hotel industry), and reveal the gap in the market. The third slide explains the method behind the item and emphasizes the interests of both parties in the transaction in simple terms.

Geometry is the fourth mathematics class at high school and describes points, lines, planes, angles, parallel lines, triangles, similarities, triangles, quadrilaterals, deformations, circles, and other aspects of area. This geometric mathematics course is divided into 10 chapters, each chapter is divided into several lessons. In each lesson you will find a theory, example and video lesson In this article, I will briefly introduce the main branch of the geometry and then describe extensive history processing. For specific branches of geometry, see Euclidean geometry, analytic geometry, projective geometry, differential geometry, non-Euclidean geometry and topology. In some ancient cultures geometric shapes that match the relationships of object length, area, volume were developed. This geometry compiles about 300 generations based on 10 axioms or assumptions in Euclidian elements where hundreds of theorems are proved by deductive logic. Elements are the essence of the century-long axiom deduction method Ancient Greeks, like Egypt and Babylonia, have practiced experimental geometry for centuries. Then they create the first formal mathematics of every type by organizing the geometry with logical rules. An important geometric book of Euclid (400 BC) The Elements forms the basis for most of the geometric foundations of the school. Descartes made the greatest progress in geometry by linking algebra and geometry. One myth is that when you think about placing a point on a plane with a pair of numbers, he is looking around flying around the ceiling. Perhaps this is related to the fact that he is asleep until 11 am everyday. Fermat also discovered coordinate geometry, but that is the Cartesian version we use today.

Proof of the outside world of Moore In his "proof of the outside world" Moore proposed several supporting hypotheses about the nature of things outside self. Moore mainly discusses hands; his argument is that both hands must logically exist if he can produce two hands. In addition, Moore's theory is that if there is only hands, it is proof of the outside world. Contrary to Moore's view, three main arguments will be discovered: firstly, all evidence of Moore is based on sensory input, and then the truth of other fact-based facts is problem It constitutes an epistemological circle of. I examined some responses to the skeptical challenges presented in Part 2. In particular, we saw four answers: (1) Descartes Cogito, (2) GE. "Proof" to Moore's outside world, (3) Dretsk denies cognitive closure, and (4) David Lewis's contextualism. After considering the strengths and weaknesses of these proposed solutions, we review the question whether skepticism is so bad or not and draw a conclusion. This course concludes with a discussion of why we have the concept of knowledge. If there is no concept of knowledge we are accustomed to, what kind of life will it be? Does this gap in our cognitive economy affect widespread or is our life as generic as that? In order to better understand if the concept is important or important, we will consider what kind of life can exist without knowledge of knowledge. Moore 's "evidence of the outside world" was created for the purpose of the soul, aimed at solving the "philosophical scandal" of Immanuel Kant. Obviously not enough for Kant and other philosophers. I believe the belief he said is true common sense, I believe in existence, and many other examples of congenital knowledge.

The enlightenment of the United States was the host of a society that accepts the practice of slavery. Most people think this is a habit; especially in the south the economy will collapse (Davis 1). However, slaves do not cooperate with their slavery, there is a rebellion like the Stornano rebellion of 1739 ('Storono rebellion' apex 1). The treatment of slaves depends on the severity of the owner and the general rules of the area. In the age of enlightenment, so-called "authoritarianism with enlightenment" appeared. In authoritarian form, the rulers were influenced by enlightenment. Strictly speaking, these "enlightened" rulers are different from the sacred right of the king, as the former accepted the basic principles of enlightenment such as reasons and humanitarianism. For example, it is said that Joseph II of the Holy Roman Empire (1765 - 1790) completely accepted the concept of social contract. Frederick the Great of Prussia (control number 1740-1786) also allowed slavery, but kept the ideal of enlightenment. In Russia of the 19th century, Alexander II adopted the thought of enlightened and released serfs. In the end, even the enlightened authoritarianism is destined to be replaced in the historical process. Okay, men and girls, ready to enlightenment In this lesson I will introduce enlightenment. what is that? Enlightenment, sometimes called the era of enlightenment, was an intellectual movement from the late 17th century to the early 18th century, emphasizing reasons, individualism, and skepticism. Enlightenment challenged the traditional religious view. Because that was such a wide movement, enlightenment did not have an accurate start date. It did not pop up, but it gradually developed. Most historians came to the beginning of enlightenment from the mid 17th century to the beginning of the 18th century. The work of intellectuals like Rene Descartes, Barus Spinoza, Isaac Newton is particularly important for the creation of enlightenment.

In this article, I will explore two arguments about the subject of the existence of God. In particular, I will focus on St. Thomas Aquinas' effective causal argument about the existence of God and the opposite of Bertrand Russell. After analyzing Aquinas' claims and Russell 's objections, we show how Russell' s objection failed. Aquinas said there are five ways to prove the existence of God, one of which is through effective causation. His premise is that all the effects we observe must be caused by other factors. The first argument about the existence of monotheism is St. Ansel's ontology. Anselm believes that perfection needs to be present. Monotheism god exists because it is perfect. However, St. Thomas Aquinas dismissed this claim. Descartes and Libby Chin reconfirmed and expanded Anselm 's argument, but later Kant believed that its existence was not a true predicate. Norman Malcolm provided further discussion. Because someone can not be perfect. Even if it exists in some way it may be perfect, but there is no such thing. But I think that it is better for true goddess and god than monotheists. St. Thomas Aquinas presented five arguments to prove the existence of God. However, this article focuses on the fifth argument. The fifth argument is considered a theoretical argument and pointed out that those lacking wisdom act for purpose. The fifth argument satisfies the existence of the god of Aquinas, but among modern readers Aquinas will argue that it ignores the laws of physics. - Our initial work was group discussion, but at first it was difficult, but I found it easier to imagine it. Teamwork helped improve my communication skills, but I confirmed that I have a lot to learn, and communication between me and my partner is really necessary for the success and completion of the discussion.

When science and technology does not inherit humans, all living things participate in symbiotic communication through breathing, smell, perception, interaction, and perception. For science and technology, the entire biosphere is excluded from communication, and only human beings use technology to communicate emotionlessly before human development technology. Today, the electromagnetic signal took over the communication. Electronic equipment is confused in communication, communication based on breathing has disappeared in the biosphere. Human organizations form their own identities, and their communication with emotional breathing like the biosphere is now the subject of controversy and suspicion. Even though the lungs are mechanically working, it is gas-tight, the emotional aspect of the air is the sea of ​​thought, and now it is the theme that is considered strange. Overall means that factors including all are not excluded. Therefore, collective effect as a whole is understood as emotion. When the respiratory tract is perceived, an overall approach is possible. This recognition constantly turns into emotions or emissions from nature. However, electrons are moving in the air, and the most basic atomic or particle level air is constantly changing. Changes in life are formed by mutation, so a huge division occurs on the surface of the earth, and the entire animal and plant has been kicked out of evolution. We do not know when this unnoticed nuclear fission will enter the final nuclear explosion. Military foolishness to promote the destruction of all aspects of nature by the country is simply to slide the biosphere into the abyss In Dr. Jane Manning and Dr. Nick Beggić's book "Angel is not this harp", we must read the constantly tested and improved "American Star Wars" weapon on the ground . However, until stratosphere and ionosphere, operated in this manner, "The first target is an electric river that flows into the thousands of miles of polar ice through the sky Electrolysis will be a vibrating artificial antenna radiating electromagnetic radiation falling on the Earth. And the story of a submarine " Not only the United States but many other countries are also addicted to the electronic operation of the earth by military goals. The anaerobic planner who lives around us must be smartest. When all the nuclear explosions occur, the oxygen will cease and they will once again reach the surface of the earth and dominate their planet. René Descartes, the father of human breathing and emotion, is really sending them fools. The most important advantage of science is the luxury that brings to everyday life. Mechanization of industrial processes reduces labor. Everyday use of ordinary people's home appliances is the result of scientific development. Machine is monotonous and replaces humans with dangerous work. Scientific discovery makes life easier Regular use of computers in our lives is very important. Technically, computers in everyday life are used to convert raw facts and data into meaningful information and knowledge. Computer science is explored and challenged everyday by humans. Computers are like electronic magic devices in our lives. According to Google Keyword Planner 100, the 1K people are searching for "the best laptop computer for business and personal use" in the past year and the desktop PC 100 - 1K suitable for small business. This article tried to explain the role of science in daily life. I emphasized the importance of science in my life and raised the idea of ​​becoming a scientist. In fact, science brings benefits to us in almost all areas of our lives and changes our entire lifestyle. From ordinary pens to printing presses, from paper airplanes to space shuttles, science is everywhere. Science is an indispensable part of our daily lives. Science makes our lives happy and comfortable through its innovation. Science has changed every aspect of life. It is possible to do impossible. The in

Cognition is a "scientific" term of "thinking process". Its usage depends on the field in different ways. For example, in psychology and cognitive science, it refers to the information processing view of the psychological constitution of an individual. It solves the problem of how neural circuits create spiritual / cognitive functions. Cognitive psychology is the foundation of most of today's learning theory, so its logo will never be deleted. This work emphasizes its influence and shows its relevance, so please consider ... Read more Since 1970, "More than 60 universities in North America and Europe have established cognitive psychology courses" (Hothersall, 2005, p. 267). Jean Piaget is the person behind this view. The basis of this view is how the brain processes, preserves and regains experience. Piaget first explained in detail the complicated way the brain stores and retrieves information compared to the computer. Cognitive psychology has been promoted by another concept of social psychology as advocated by Fishbein and Ajzen. It says that our actions are roughly equivalent to our actions. Carl Spencer Rashley was born on 7th August 1890, 7th August 1853 (Ajzen, & Fishbein, 1980). He died on a farm in West Virginia and performed a maze experiment using a mouse, proving that maze learning is not limited to "specific cortical areas" (Goodwin, 2008, p. 96). Mr. Rashy is responsible for discovering that the cortex is functioning as a system, claiming it is characterized by equipotential effects and mass effects. But only to a certain extent. Cognitive psychology definition paper 2 cognitive psychology definition paper cognitive psychology test heart. Brain and mind are thought to be two different things. The brain is an organ and the brain is the result of a personal thought process. In this article we will study exactly what cognitive psychology is, milestones in the development of cognitive psychology, and behavior observation in cognitive psychology. Definition of cognitive psychology Cognitive psychology is responsible for examining psychological processes and understanding why individuals do what they are doing. Some of the principles that it examines are personal perception, learning, attention, reasoning, memory, and problem solving. Everyone's recognition is different. Individuals use her or his perception to form judgments and thoughts about her or her environment. Everyone has different learning methods, it affects the way anyone learns Running Head: Definition of Cognitive Psychology 1 Definition of Cognitive Psychology Heather Burgess PSY 360 October 24, 1013 Dr. Matt Pearcey Definition of Cognitive Psychology 2 Definition of Cognitive Psychology Cognitive psychology is about learning, memory, perception And research on the psychological processes of thinking. As an official field of psychology, its roots can go back to Descartes, which tries to explain how thinking works and proposes analogy of "hydraulic system of neural function". 2007, p. 26) He observed a moving image at Saint-Germain-en-Laye. It is not only a constant pursuit of how the mind works, but also a merciless pursuit of the spiritual composition that ultimately constitutes the basis of cognitive theory. It is clear that different approaches are needed when psychologists study how psychological processes produce behavior. It only thinks of what I learned through rewards and punishments. Cognitive psychology psychology is defined as a study of mind, emotion, behavior. The main point of view in psychology is called cognitive psychology and focuses on explaining the process of thinking through the development of a theoretical psychological system. Cognitiveism is somewhat broad in other respects. This research paper is about to explain this field of psychology in detail by explaining its meaning, the relationship between psychology and psychology in other fields, and similarity with other fields. In addition, this article will explain vari

Abortion is a very controversial matter. As people began to hear about abortion, people had their own opinion. I am a professional life. If you put yourself in this position, I think that you should deal with these effects. Why does an innocent child have to devote life to the other two mistakes? Do not risk if you are not ready to take responsibility I think that abortion is murder. I think you will bring out life from something that is worthy of adventure. The second thing the sperm and the egg meet are opportunities for life and after that it should be treated as a living child. Someone asked a question on the website www.standupgirl.com: "Does a sick child slowly die, live the life of his life, and put a burden on his family?" Webmaster answered It was. "Ethics" Should we eliminate pain and burden? Some of them are miserable and moving. Land did not change the way of abortion - to kill people. "The sentence is exactly the same as what I believe, basically saying you do not know the child's potential.Do you know Down's syndrome or perfectly healthy? Abortion is in the future All the opportunities and all for the kids will be killed, whether it is birth defects, death or success All kids should have a chance Why are these babies different? All they deserve Abortion is said to be legalized to prevent child abuse.This is a decision in the case of Roe vs. Wade legitimizing the death of a child is helpful for child abuse There are no valuable help for abuse of children.167,000 child abuse and abandoned abortion was reported in 1973, 785,100 cases were reported in 1980 and 22.855 in 1987 One thousand people were reported Therefore, the overall inference to legalize abortion has not been successful All abortion is really a free mother, and if you can only call her her mother, I will take all responsibility. If you are responsible for maturing enough, making decisions and taking risks, you can go back to all of these, and you should mature enough to accept the results. I'm selfish I also live. I think abortion is immorality, immorality, and finally murder. I do not want to live in a world where I can kill your child or even have the opportunity to live in this world. The important thing is that even if you have to take risks and prepare for the outcome, you should not run away even if the situation gets tough. Ethics is defined as a study of the moral value of human behavior. (Www.philosophyclass.com/ethics). Morality is a field of philosophy that uses philosophical methods rather than religious methods. This is not the belief of religious figures used to develop the moral position but the application of human reasoning for moral problems. Epistemology is an effective form of knowledge study. It comes from the Greek "epistem" meaning knowledge. (Www.philosophyclass.com/epistemology). Descartes is believed to be the first philosopher to seriously address epistemology. The relevance of knowledge is considered more or less obvious by previous philosophers. The classification of traditional philosophy is ethics, logic, epistemology (knowledge), metaphysics, and philosophical history. We will explain the above morals as the most common research should do. Logic is a study of effective discussion, therefore methodological study. Epistemology is a study of knowledge and related problems. Metaphysics is a general category of other philosophies, but includes research on the most common level and nature of ontologies, ie events, objects, abstractions, concrete, universal, special, etc. , Events, possibilities etc. Also included are studies on various sub-disciplines such as identity, truth, causality, general and concepts such as space and time, necessity and possibility, and linguistic philosophy and spiritual philosophy.

We can not divide the world into "we" and "them", but still we can not avoid the conflict between the two groups, but this is the history of the world through the eyes of some people. People try to define themselves by what they are not, and in the East, these people see other people quite different from them. Cultural and religious differences make it easier to separate from the east, but according to Western language the difference will not stop there. Asians look different in body and mind. The Western world looks at the east complexity and marks them as being inferior. The Newton Revolution presented a good argument against this view. The east is trapped in the past and resists change. Thus, people in the East seem to be behind other countries in the world. The difference in this way of thinking is due to how people perceive the surrounding world. Henry Kissinger explained this in his article "Domestic Structure and Foreign Policy". "Culture that escaped from the initial influence of Newtonian thought holds the view before Newton that the real world is almost completely inside the observer ..." Bernard Cohen in his book "The Newtonian Revolution Described as follows "There are signs of revolution also on the internal aspects of science.Target, method, result.Bacon and Descartes are one of the new science that results of scientific research will improve human condition on the earth I agree with the goal Many of the scientists of the 17th century believe that pursuing the scientific understanding of nature is feasible because it can promote the comprehensive development of mankind. HYLELINK "http://www.garanteprivacy.it/garante/frontdoor/1,1003,,00.html?LANG=2" \ t "_blank" U.S. Patent No. 675, dated 31 December 1996, Protection of individuals and other subjects in data processing - "Italy data protection law" to process personal data when processing Italy. The Italian data protection law respects natural person's rights, fundamental freedom, and dignity, especially with regard to privacy and personal identity. This Act shall enter into force on divorce or living apartment signatures signed after 31 December 2018, or divorce or separation certificates signed by 31 December 2018, as well as divorced or separate documents revised after that date . If the correction explicitly states that the modification made by it applies in part to such modification. This change in tax treatment of marriage makes it more difficult to build a domestic divorce and divorce as the couple can no longer allocate income and reduce taxes. This revision will result in a substantial increase in profit as we maintain taxable income on the income tax return for larger income and convert other payments for spouse with lower income into after tax. In other words, divorce gets worse For corporate income tax returns in 2018, it is necessary to apply a multiple tax rate to taxable income. If the taxable year of the company is before January 1, 2018 and ends after December 31, 2017, it is necessary to calculate and distribute the tax by combining the tax rates of 2017 and 2018. IRS has a worksheet (p. 18) useful for this calculation. Form 1120 needs to be sent on the 15th day of the third month after the company's tax year ends. If your company pays tax on 31 December, you will need to submit this tax report by March 31 of the following year. If the due date is a weekend or a holiday, return to the next business day. The taxable deadline for this year's fiscal year shows the specific deadline for submitting the income tax return and prolonging the effective date of the declaration. DD

Human condition is "important events and situations such as characteristics of elements of existence of human beings, birth, growth, mood, desire, conflict, and death". [1] This is a very broad topic that has been studied and analyzed from various angles including religion, philosophy, history, art, literature, anthropology, psychology, biology, and so on. As a literary term "human condition" is often used to blur the topic's context, such as the meaning of life or moral issues. [2] Every major religion believes human condition clearly. For example, Buddhism teaches that life is an eternal cycle, dissatisfaction, death, and a resurrection that human beings can release through the noble paths of eight. At the same time, Christianity is taught that humans are born in sinful state and are destined to fail in the post-mortem world unless saved through Jesus Christ. Philosophers offer many ideas. An influential and old view is the Republic, and Plato is exploring the issue of "What is Justice". And let's say that it is not just a matter between individuals but a problem of society as a whole and urges him to design a utopia. In 2000, Rene Descartes declared "I believe." Because he believes human thought, especially its rational ability, is the main determinant of the truth. . One such modern school, existentialism tries to compatibilize the lost direction and disarray in the universe. Many literary works provide views on human condition. [2] A famous example is the monologue of Shakespeare's "the whole world is a stage" and it delicately summarizes the seven stages of life. Psychology has many theories such as Maslow's needs hierarchy and concept of identity crisis. It also has various ways such as physical therapy developed by Holocaust survivor Victor Frank to discover and confirm the meaning of mankind. Other approaches, cognitive behavioral therapy have become widespread treatment for clinical depression. [Four] Since the announcement of Charles Darwin's "Origin of Species" in 1859, the biological theory of evolution was important. This theory thinks that humans are related to other creatures, survival and extinction, natural selection is the main survival factor. It provides a new belief like social Darwinism and a basis for new technology like antibiotics. [Five] Among the worthy applications of the word "human condition" are the Andre Mallow novel "Fate of Man", Rene Magritte's painting "La Condition Huma Inn", Hannah Arendt's political philosophy, and Kobayashi Masaki's movie trilogy . Hannah Arendt is one of my favorite political philosophers and has become a clear and powerful thinker on human condition. However, "Eichmann of Jerusalem" and "Revolutionary Period" gave me a big impression, but I am not so enthusiastic about "human condition". Here, Arendt aims for a more comprehensive and ambitious thing than the previous one, but I feel it is more routine and limited. Among this enormous work (though it has over 300 pages, but it feels long), Hannah Arendt analyzes the state of the three people, labor, work, and behavior. Labor is a slave in a natural state, a human must do: his body works hard to gain the necessary nutrients and survival for a day's living. Work is like a craftsman, expressing one's identity through physical labor and diligence. Behavior is a human role in diverse actions - imagination to think, talk, invent, and equal respects to them, to improve themselves in their eyes Behavior is the only activity that occurs directly among men ... It is not the fact that humans live in the world living on the earth in response to diversified human condition. All aspects of human condition are related to politics, but this pluralism is especially state. It is not only the second necessary condition in all political life but also the state of each treaty. Another way to understand the importance of promotion and diversity is to understand that behavior becomes meaningless unless someone else

Since human beings have appeared, humans have always wanted to find the truth. Humans think and explore excellent ideas and concepts that lead to many confusions. Perhaps the most troublesome question is what the soul is. In Roman times people believed in many gods, spirits, and life after death. As time went on, various religious beliefs were born and new faith was established. Believing in God replaces many of the faith of God and establishes the belief that the soul of a person changes into a posterity. definitely. Indeed, the brain was not thoroughly investigated and explained until the late 17th century. Until then, humans were respected by the essence of their souls. Philosopher René Descartes began exploring the concept of human "soul" and in 1637 wrote a book called "Methodology" to explain his philosophy. Among them, he mentioned his observations on how animals move and respond without the concept of soul. This "soul" is actually a human brain, and shortly afterwards, Thomas Think of the essence of the soul as a focus of pure spiritual possibilities. Please consider it as a flower seed. Then, the essence of this soul began to develop into 12 flower petals, three of which have soul flowers: petals of consciousness, will and love. These also correspond to three primary colors. Then with this development of the soul, these developments (like flowers) continue to other lives in these three ways. But in every life, this soul must be rediscovered by personality - self. And personality - self including self-self is the one who builds her own right first and it is self-consistent before it can become a psychological, emotional and material carrier of the realization of the soul We must develop unity. Representation Rediscovering a person's soul becomes very important, it depends on the personality environment and the circumstances of that person, so it may not happen even in many lives during the lifetime . 20 Genesis 1: 26-27. 21 For example the origins of the soul and sacred essence are not origins. The soul is limited, but the sacred essence is not so, etc. 22 Nicolas Gregory. Gregory on the soul and resurrection 45. Lisa. On the soul and resurrection 45-46. 24 Nicolas Gregory. About the soul and resurrection 46 - 48. The permanent combination of the soul and the physical element after death is the intellectual foundation for St. Gregory to establish his resurgence theory. Interestingly, this feeling seems to be reflected in the strong hatred of orthodox Christian cremation and the embarrassment of the grave. Nicolas Gregory. About the soul and resurrection 49. St. Gregory seems to enhance Plato's concept of three souls, rationality, liveliness and appetite, rejecting it. Republic Plato (Editors Edith Hamilton and Huntington Keynes; Trans

The appearance of "Hamlet" is the story of a young prince compared to the reality, and he must decide the truth about the death of his father. Through script, the basic theme of appearance and reality is constant. Most of the main character is hidden behind the lie and camouflage, hiding the truth, so there is little real self-visibility. Because the fraud maze is badly distorted, only Hamlet knows the truth, as the ghosts of his father revealed this to him. Because reality, fantasy, appearance and deception in Shakespeare's "Hamlet" plays an important role in today's society due to its appearance, they also play an important role in William Shakespeare's play "Hamlet" Fulfill. From the first scene to the last scene, Shakespeare explains the theme of appearance and reality through plot and character. Play conspiracy is full of events and events, and these events and events are not. One of the things is the death of Ophelia. Regardless of whether it is dressed during Halloween or as a character in a drama or movie, usually one of the appearance and reality pretends to be someone else. Shakespeare used the concept of camouflage in his "Hermitage". The second theme of the theater is the appearance and reality. Through the drama, things will not seem to make them see. Catherine seems to be genuine, but it completely masks the damage she felt. Bianca is like a self-sacrificial angel Please help me with this work. "MLM of appearance and reality," William Shakespeare's "Hamlet" in "Hamlet" has revealed a consistent theme of apparent and reality in the overall role behavior. In many cases, but it seems so that there is sincerity and honesty, in fact, dishonesty and deception is usually the true intentions of personality. Specifically, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern, Hamlet and Claudius proved a discontinuity between appearance and reality. In the play, these characters The appearance of "Hamlet" is one of the central themes of Shakespeare's "Hamlet". The role of role in the play is the role of the hidden character - in fact the murderer and looter Claudius plays a role of sad brother and legitimate king, in her son's view Gertrude's Adultery plays a role she is the "most harmful woman" who plays the role of "the most beautiful queen". Even Hamlet himself played a crazy role in his attempt. Philosophical problems in Bertrand Russell's "appearance and reality" The approach to his subject in Bertrand Russell's "philosophical problems" involves Descartes' fundamental skepticism, in which the author cancels all previous assumptions It was. Certain reality and existence. In the first chapter, Russell 's quest for reality in reality compared to reality starts with observation of his surroundings. For example, I checked the form and he confirmed it

Just as people read essential quotes from Ayn Rand from the story of the national anthem, there is always a theme that tries to escape, just as Prometheus escapes from her story. All three references listed are trio we have and as a society we strive to defeat individuality. The introduction emphasizes that we can not survive without individualism and bring our unique personality alone. Certainly, all citations are one, but at the same time they also have their own individualism. Each reference has its own purpose, and the author wants to understand expression references to everyone. When he made himself happy, he felt he completed his mission in life. "My happiness does not require a higher goal to prove it, my happiness is not a means to accomplish my purpose, it is the objective." This statement is Prometheus's statement to the community. I make it better, but he carefully wants to improve myself personally. Prometheus hopes that everyone can find happiness on their own. "Yes, I am delighted." Ayn Rand quoted a text similar to the quotation of Rene Descartes, "I think this is something like" This sentence tells society what Prometheus can do for itself There. He does not need the social "we" to complete the work. Prometheus can think independently and I want to express myself as a person. "I" indicates that he can do it and do anything. Prometheus believes that if he can think of himself for himself, he can live alone, as Rene de Carte can do. As he is thinking about himself alone, he is still alive and can express his real face. The main quotes of the national ante are written for real purpose. Ian Rand's mission is to write these important quotes so that everyone can use them to express their meaning. Rand is not listening to the subject of the subjectivity society, but is eager to allow their individualism to use these quotes to make these quotations a reality . Various grades of the annual paper contest every year: 9th and 10th anniversary anthem essay contest, Ayn Rand novel Anthem, Ayn Rand novels 11th and 12th grade Fountainhead essay contest of The Fountainhead, Atlas Schlag College student essay Contest, Ailland's novel About Atlas Are you a leader? Are you an entrepreneur? creator? changer? If you answer Jesus to any of these, you will be invited to the opportunity to change your dream into reality! For ages 13 to 20, please use 49 creative and fun 90 second video and registration form to earn 49 kinds of seed bonus of 1,000 dollars. Anthem Essay has no "myself", there is not "you" but "we". Ian Rand's book shows distortion and various forms of collectivism. Everyone is told what they will do in the future. Children are not even allowed to know who their parents are, and they never have a chance to see them. Nevertheless, only one in society can see it, and no one can ever see it. Equality felt it was difficult to find individualism in his life and social rules. Equality will eventually find individualism in his odd society and escape from his own safe shelters. The world depicted in the national anthem does not show signs that people are likely to be related to group society. The scientific achievements of Prometheus's world have hardly made progress in the period after "the era in words". In Ayn Rand's book "Anthem", the political and social structure was initially shaped like collectiveism, and then further tests were done to regard themselves as totalitarian. Ayn Rand wrote this book in 1946. The theme I see is how life controls society. I think that's true. Three points are used to prove that this is correct The three main arguments are: There is no individualism. Working for the community 3. Because men reject other men, how to reject electricity, this is the discovery Various grades of the annual paper contest every year: 9th and 10th anniversary anthem essay contest, Ayn Rand novel Anthem, Ayn Rand novels 11th and 12th grade Fountainhead essay contest of The Fountainhead, Atlas Schlag

Art is a basic necessity. There is no civilization or mankind that truly believes that art is a waste of time. In our time, time is money. Thus, in order to be consistent with the purpose of survival, art must be funded to provide time to artists. Any discussion on art originates from the arrogance of separation that is scientifically expressed as a difference in Descartes and is often a work highlighted by "Eyesland". In our society, I hope that the government is responsible for providing education and medical services through taxation to us. This means that the government is responsible for ensuring that they use the money effectively. It is not the government's responsibility to pay attention to citizen's interests and hobbies. Their situation is very different, and the government can not expect to satisfy the hobby of all people. Individual interests should be private, if they want to explore their own interests, they should expect them to pay themselves when they gain a profit. If we fund publicly the art, we will actually get the money that will be for those artists from those who are not interested in art. Government expenditure should focus on objective and beneficial policies that do not benefit all policies and policies can only provide past times to a few people. In the United States, the National Arts Foundation originally had requested and procured arts for decorating monuments such as public buildings and war memorial monuments. This kind of art has places in public life, but our government is responsible for paying taxpayers' funding responsibly. These efforts should be applied to expenses and broad appeals to the voting citizens. I do not know that the NEA is a welfare program for mentally handicapped people, alternative lifestyle habits, or a trade organization representing academic elite in the art world, but I should rule and restore the original function is. Ideally, no funds are needed. Patriotic Americans should collect money from donors to donate art to where they are needed or to create our monuments and monuments. If we value art, we ought to be skeptical of bureaucracy participation. Public financed arts need to reach some agreement on issues suitable for funds. It is a mistake to treat extreme and controversial art as a public good, as all taxpayers must fund it regardless of whether it is an ethical or artistic objection. Is it fair to force tax on godly Christians to fund Jesus Christ's soaked in urine cans? Or will you force Muslims to ridiculous or ridiculous Muhammad's job? In October of this year, the England Arts Council announced new funds for art organizations working in virtual reality in relatively new fields, so machine learning based projects can also be included in future public fund programs I will. However, the most important thing is to ask about the electric power system promoted by this technology, not the technology itself. Do you use artwork to create a showdown network, or do you sit behind the monitor and see a man brush your teeth? If AI is part of our life, there should be art to satisfy it. In addition to the private foundation, public funded art institutions can also be a source of funding for artists. According to Art Americans, in 2015, 35% of local art institutions (LAA) funded individual artists and 30% to arts organizations and artists. (This is the catalog of the National Art Museum.) Artist's Writing: Let's improve your proposal. Gigi Rosenberg, the author of "Artist's Granville Guide" (most of the Foundation Center Libraries), wrote and organized successful proposals for colleagues and friends, persuaded the correct funders and attitudes of successful donors I will explain how to imitate it.

The almighty and theological problem is the problem that many philosophers are trying to solve. This question is called "Why is there still evil if you believe that God is omnipotent and perfectly kind?" In this article, I will discuss the devil and omnipotence in his work "Solution / assertion" I will do this, explain the concept of free will to understand or solve the problem, how Mackie and I will clarify why the conclusion was reached. Is your God Almighty God? The Almighty can be defined as "have great great or infinite authority or power." If he is omnipotent, your god will be able to change the future at this moment. In order for this attribute to be effective your god has to give up his intellectual ability. It is because the future becomes uncertain or omniscient. In addition, if he is omnipotent, he has the ability to change himself, which means his immutability is incompatible with his totipotency. Why does a Christian pray to God? If God is omniscient, omnipotent, omnipotent, fair, loving, and kind, we ask him to help change the way we feel the struggle Is it? If he is omniscient and ubiquitous, he will know your question without asking. If he is omnipotent, he can help you. If he is a loving and kind person, he will help you without your question. If he is right, why did you ask him to change his plan? Is he always right or is he? If one omnipotent and well-known person creates the universe at time = 0, do we have a free will? Of course, the answer is "no". The evidence is as follows. God is omnipotent. It can do anything (logical). Almighty requirement is that it must also be okay - it knows everything. If it can do anything, it can instantly see the position of everything in the universe and understand everything. There is no problem for now. Let's say you have two choices. He can go to heaven or hell. The key to the problem is to balance what he does in order to take him to heaven. Because life develops around a lot of perspectives, for this person, think about the exact truth moment when he finally makes the right choice and goes to heaven. Almighty almighty is one of God's traditional attributes. Under normal usage, God is omnipotent, that is, God is "all power" or God (in a sense) "anything". However, it is satisfactory that a satisfactory analysis is well known. The concept of almighty. For example, it is widely believed that totipotency must limit what logically brings. In other words, he says that God can do logically viable but logically impossible, he said he can not make a square circle and can not say it Said. 2 and 2 are 5 Cartes. Descartes, however, clearly denied this argument and believed that the totipotency of God is an unconditional logical possibility. Another question about God's almighty argument is related to whether God can sin

In many cases, doubt can be regarded as having a big influence on pursuing access to knowledge. In order to establish a balanced answer to this question, it is necessary to rigorously evaluate some important terms. The term "alleged" can be defined as feeling a hesitancy about the validity of a particular matter being claimed. "Key" can be viewed as a more advanced meaning, in this case a tool that can access knowledge. Deep person, René Descartes is often referred to as "father of modern philosophy" and calls "the existence of mind" the only absolute certainty in the universe. At the beginning of the civilization, the number of people focused on the pursuit of knowledge was very small, but in the classic era of human civilization, Plato Athens University, Aristotle University, Alexandria Library, and many other educational institutions To When classical ancients passed a knowledge torch in the golden age of Islamic civilization, Baghdad's wisdom house (Bayt al-Hikma) and Byzantine classic text, and past survival. It started with a handful of knowledge. It was appreciated by a small number of people and was not further understood, but the trickle eventually became a flow. What are our goals? A community that depends on the pursuit and use of knowledge in God's love, with knowledge truly unified and consistent. The community not only concentrates on pursuing knowledge (although this is essential), to pursue how to use it through a smart Christian life, to love training and to fulfill a common good I also concentrate. God blessed the existence of MacLaurin CSF at the University of Minnesota. Through his offering and empowerment, we will do more than ever. The participation in the reading group and the attendance rate in the lecture are stronger than before and our student group continues to attract new students every semester. At the time of writing this article, we have just completed our monthly activities. We pursue knowledge for your own interests: We do not understand it, do not use it, and a lot of teaching triangles to children who do not spend their lives on mathematics learning I will spend money. We have liberated millions of students from fiction and literature over thousands of hours, but eventually most students have never read the pleasure never read again. I have never read these articles. When reading books were related to the exam, I missed this. Curiosity of free-living is like basic science. Instead of focusing on discovery and usage of knowledge, it is pursuit of quest, adventure, question and quest. This is the pursuit of knowledge for knowledge. This is for adventure and adventure. "Why, why, why?" Childhood isolated things (although this can be said to apply to making us tense). Like applied science, application curiosity uses existing information and applies explorations, adventures, questions, and explorations to find solutions to existing problems. Applying curiosity often requires benefits from free range curiosity. It grows sweets in the garden to see if growing delicious sweet trees instead of disgusting tomatoes. This is a summer science camp to identify science subjects best suited for studying in high school.

In his 1971 paper "Personal Identity", Derek Parfit believes it is possible and desirable to release it from the premise of personal identity without losing all its importance. In researching how to do this, Parfit concluded that "the problem of identity is not important" (Parfit, 1971, p. 2: 3). In this article I will prove that the paper by Parfit is effective and positive for human behavior. In the first half of this article we will review the paper in further detail and in the second half we face criticism and evaluate Parfit's assertions. Derek Parfit explained and explained the difference between non-minimalist and minimalist's personal identity in Parfit in 1984 (he initially put it in "simple" view and "complex" view of Parfit 1973 I divided). For the first statement of the psychological criteria of identity, see "Consistency Persistence" in 1979 by John Locke of Locke and Nedditch. For non-inductive objections, see Thomas Reid's Prose for Man and Butler's Knowledge 1736. Advocacy for Contemporary Psychology, Harold-Noonan's Identity, and 1984 Sydney Schubert's Shoe Maker's Contribution For non-reductionism of modern identity, see Swinburne's contribution. For the modern support of biological standards, see Olson 1997. Derek Parfit was one of the first contemporary theorists who explicitly explored the relationship between identity and morality from the "personal identity" that began in the early 1970s, in particular "the principle of self-and late morals". That is his remark and prospect of development. The third part of his book, Reasons and People (published in 1984), then the paper was obtained. In many respects, Parfit is a description of Rockman's personal identity despite major deviations. He is a "reductionist" and the facts about human and individual identity include more specific facts about the brain, the body, a series of interrelated psychological and physical events (Parfit 1984, 210-211). Negative reductionism is called "non-return principle". According to this doctrine, facts about human and individual identity usually include facts about Descartes' self or spirit. Derek Parfit proposes the theory of the human ontological state that is expected to answer the fission problem and the paradox of individual identity. This article does not fairly deal with the complexity of Paffett's theory which has been the focus of discussion since 1970, but it is worth mentioning its main features. Although Parfit confirms the existence of human beings, their special ontological status as non-independent substances can be expressed by arguing that people do not need to be listed separately in the list of existing items . In particular, people themselves are different from their own bodies and minds, but the existence of people has only brain and body, and a series of interrelated psychological and physical events. These are basic arguments of Parfit's simplification theory. Let's think about analogy: Celini's Venus is made of bronze

From my own point of view, humans are the creations of God. The Bible makes me understand that human beings are created in God's statue, and in the process of creating human beings, he breathes life's breath to humans and makes him active. I think human beings are very unique because they are created like God. Human beings are the best among all creations, as humans can think, create new ones, and have control over all other living creatures on the planet. Humans have the advanced knowledge and skills to do things, so they are the creator of the only life who understands their existence. Let me first explain why Christianity appeared in my book. In the Hebrew Bible philosophy, I defended them by clarifying my position and comparing it with important alternatives that a wise person might accept. Since the subject of this book is how people should read the Hebrew Bible, then one of the main alternatives I have claimed (one not only!) Should be surprised by anyone is. Someone who approaches the Bible after a long-term contact with the New Testament and its interpreters. As I wrote in this book, it became totally incompetent to read after the Hebrew Bible had been associated with the Christian New Testament in most times and places and read according to its teachings. The New Testament idea has returned to the Hebrew Scriptures making it difficult to study the Bible (not just Christians but also Jews). The philosophy I started at the stage of my life is far beyond the philosophy I am reading. Indeed, the degree of the philosophical reading I gave during this time was the result of his private journal, his book Sickness Unto Death, I and Thou of Martin Buber, ambiguous about the mystical tradition of orthodox Christianity It is from a book. Erkegaol's personal prayer and Ralph Waldo Emerson's "self-belief" and rereading of clergy in the Old Testament. Besides that, I meditated about T.S. Elliot's "Love Song of Alfred · Prourok" and the 91st Psalm. That's it. Plato, Kant, Hegel, and Descartes are not. I tried not to prove anything to anyone. I do not need to convince the professor that the existence of God and material reality do not exist. I just want to find reasons for life. "Unless you become a child ..." spiritual life can be defined as the development of personality in the field of faith and grace. My Christian personality is not simply a nutritious person, but I am the center of personal and shining personal thinking and emotion. This new child does not match with the crowd as usual, but I will keep my face, I will have the courage to become myself and I will protect it not to be like anyone else. The magnificent image of Jesus Christ waiting to develop and express

"It is far from giving power to viewers, not to competitors - These [realistic] performance ultimately achieve social and nonhumanitarian behavior, so the smallest common divisible maximum possible outcome It will be "(Sexton). Timothy Sexton's strict comments on real television may be a bit extreme, but they are a widely acknowledged view that real television is a major failure of society as a whole and the society collapses (or it is so) It is based on. Although real television may not be the most useful form of entertainment, I believe that the transformation of social norms from idol worship to self-propagation will create a real environment. I left a reference line from elementary school that should be one of his most famous quotes: "Because I said impossible, I told you the wrong things in some respects We must do it. " That word defines Holmes and everything else that Doyle and Watson have given us. As the passage of time continues, Rand Al Thor becomes a dragon's regenerator. Canon did not promote Holmes into the body of God. In the Victorian era, such movements will be heresy. But Holmes is indeed far beyond his contemporaries in Scotland. He became the most famous detective in Europe. The government from France to the Netherlands asked him. The pope personally asked for help. We know that he has repeatedly supported the British throne and government. His reputation spreads widely, both authorities and individuals are appealing to him. In the detective, his achievement is almost like God. You may have heard the famous quote of the philosopher RenéDescartes: "I think, so I am." This is a famous quote that summarizes his argument to prove his existence. It seems wonderful, but thinking is not enough to prove or accomplish the purpose. Be sure to act. Any action. Please give me feedback immediately. After all, we are material creatures. While constantly evaluating how the environment functions, the meat and blood of the nervous system A famous proverb is "I think myself." David Hume, an experientist, wants to explain knowledge based on non-theology. Hume believes that there is no a priori concept and that our concept is not born, but an experience derived from ideas. He believes that these ideas can be divided into impressions and ideas. He believes that human beings learn through impressions, and if there is no impression, then there is nothing to think about. Unlike Descartes, Hume is everyone's view

People's choices play an important role in their lives. Most of us believe that we can make these choices freely and we have free will to make these choices. What we are missing is that free will is not as simple as it looks. When a person makes a choice he does not think what those things cause is what he does. Therefore, for the desire of whether he made these choices for his own interest or wanted to make these choices. Whether the environment urges him to make these choices or whether he is willing to ignore his own environment. Emmanuel Kant (1724-1804). Kant is a German philosopher writing in the field of metaphysics, ethics and knowledge. He is the founder of the philosophical tradition of exploring the limits of human reason and "establishing a moral philosophy based on responsibility" "Cantianism". His perception of punishment will be seen as pure retribution. He thinks that crime should be punished, but punishment for other purposes such as deterrence is to violate "category order", especially for others for others You should not use it. Well, if human nature is reality, what will happen from a philosophical point of view? Why are people interested in using philosophers and philosophy as a guide for life why this technical debate is concerned. Let's explore this through a brief discussion about two philosophies that provide strong human defense and are consistent with cognitive science: existentialism and stoicism Theology has two forms, philosophy and religion. Philosophical theology ("natural theology") is a subdivision of philosophy. It uses natural human reasons to explore the most important of all problems, questions about God. Religious theology (or "eschatological theology") is to rationally explore the meaning and consequences of faith in revealing religion. Written Bible definitely. Indeed, the brain was not thoroughly investigated and explained until the late 17th century. Until then, humans were respected by the essence of their souls. Philosopher René Descartes began exploring the concept of human "soul" and in 1637 wrote a book called "Methodology" to explain his philosophy. Among them, he mentioned his observations on how animals move and respond without the concept of soul. This "soul" is actually a human brain, and shortly afterwards, Thomas

I heard that you get a lower student loan when you enter a civil servant if you work with a low salary. truly? Do we know that universities actually increase people's income? Perhaps college students earn more! College is a comprehensive education before high school graduation, graduation or professional degree program. There are various forms of this, but the most obvious is the four-year bachelor's degree program and two-year associate degree. Research universities, liberal arts universities, university universities, community colleges, music schools, art schools are provided. Educator Josef Albers pointed out that he saw something in a class taught by Yale University in New Haven, Connecticut in 1955, a German artist. John Cohen / Getty Images Because most students are not participating in the 4 year accommodation experience described in movies and television programs, popular culture and media draw university misleading pictures. In the fall of 2013, only 45.2% of students majored in undergraduate courses for 4 years. Most students have part-time, two-year degree, or both. I heard that you get a lower student loan when you enter a civil servant if you work with a low salary. truly? Do we know that universities actually increase people's income? Perhaps college students earn more! The answer is simple in the past: the university is where you come to learn about these things. However, as higher education expands its scope, it becomes increasingly difficult to tell what the university is like and what the university is like. In the United States I now teach, more than 17 million undergraduates are planning to participate in this program this autumn. They go through scale, public and private institutions, two and four year systems, online and on campus. Some of them will pursue accounting, nursing or web design careers with profit organizations like DeVry University and Phoenix University. Many people enter the community college, get useful qualifications, or prepare to transfer to a four-year university. Not to mention experts, some people enter liberal arts college without professional planning. For any course, quite a few people will encounter Descartes as part of undergraduate requirements. Why is this happening? Generally, university administrators do not know what university education is: now, I will start from the beginning. That is the beginning. University is the best institution in our country. In fact, they are the crown jewelry of the most effective educational system in the world. If someone knows what learning is, those who manage the university should do so. Teaching the future of our country is not an easy thing, education is not an easy question to answer. Some of the world's best educators are still trying to figure out what kind of things are happening in the educational process. In our current education system, student education seems to be a process that can not be quantified by blows or missing. Art may not be technology

Throughout history, there were many influential people, events, and times that have made a great contribution to the society we know today. Many of them contribute to cultural, industrial or territorial conflicts that define our border. Unlike the world war that created these boundaries in the past few years, the age of enlightenment gives way of thinking to the world, gives how they see their own individual society, the world and the government bring new perspectives It was. Age of Enlightenment is an age of scientific awakening, and Age of Enlightenment is mainly developed in France. The starting point of enlightenment is John Rock's book on human understanding. Enlightenment attacked the leaders of the church and focused on the problems that had been avoided in the past. Trying to challenge the church takes courage. As the Church said, enlightenment questioned people such as "Earth is the center of the universe". There are four major areas of transformation: religion, intellectuals, economics, and politics. From the Middle Ages to Enlightenment and the 19th century, along with enlightenment and the 19th century, the evolution of knowledge has changed drastically. From the 17th century to the 18th and 19th centuries, the age of enlightenment was thought to be a cultural movement of intellectuals. It also began spreading to American colonies on continental Europe. This is by purpose https://www.studymode.com/subjects/which-labels-for-the-middle-ages-best-describe-the-era-between-500-and-1400-in-europe-the-dark-ages- Europe's most faithful, or oldest feudal age of the golden era - page 1. Html "The labels of the Middle Ages best describe the European Dark Ages from 500 to 1400, or the feudalism era of the European Golden Age," theses and research papers Okay, men and girls, ready to enlightenment In this lesson I will introduce enlightenment. what is that? Enlightenment, sometimes called the era of enlightenment, was an intellectual movement from the late 17th century to the early 18th century, emphasizing reasons, individualism, and skepticism. Enlightenment challenged the traditional religious view. Because that was such a wide movement, enlightenment did not have an accurate start date. It did not pop up, but it gradually developed. Most historians came to the beginning of enlightenment from the mid 17th century to the beginning of the 18th century. The work of intellectuals like Rene Descartes, Barus Spinoza, Isaac Newton is particularly important for the creation of enlightenment.

What is rationality: Reason of virtue means to recognize and accept reason as the only source of knowledge, the only worthwhile judgment, and the only action guidelines. ... This means that all people's beliefs, values, goals, desires and behaviors must be based on the commitment of the thinking process, selection and validation principles. What is experience: empirical knowledge is knowledge about facts that people may encounter in their experience. These are always special and can be of many kinds, including the need for extensive training or some equipment to experience them. In addition, much of the empirical knowledge is actually conveyed through teaching from the authorities, but it may be fairly reliable and true. Experience is often a bit vague. Therefore, since one may have been in the UK, I think I have knowledge of British experience, but even if it is so empirical, what the word "British" represents is personal It is a little too much for experience. And people. The way to decide if someone has some empirical knowledge is to test it in some way by using logic, or by referring to other knowledge that you think is possible. Method experiments can be as easy as finding words in a dictionary, or it can be as complicated as using a cyclotron or PET scanner. Why knowledge is rational and empirical: Kant's theory fills the gap between empiricism and rationalism and reveals that they can be understood as equilibrium, so historically and philosophically very important . Components In other words, our knowledge comes from empirical encounters and rational manipulation, and we can prove that pure experience and purely rational way can not achieve knowledge achievement. Instead, he believes that human understanding of its own nature allows experience and can be used for reasoning. Kant's theory not only provides a theoretical explanation of how modern results such as pure mathematics and natural sciences are possible but also the interaction between experience itself and understanding is based on its origin and boundary Push the philosophy forward in the direction that is important to find. It's a place. Human knowledge Finally, we believe that knowledge is reasonable and empirical. Immanuel Kant was a German philosopher who decided to combine these two ideas. Descartes believes that certain knowledge is "a priori" and irrelevant to experience. The other side of the idea is "ex posteriori" empirical knowledge. Transcendental knowledge is always correct, and ex post knowledge is comprehensive. Kant believes in the third type called synthetic a priori. This type is necessary and there are empirical elements The concept of prior knowledge is based on intuitive or rational insight. Laurence BonJour said in his article "The structure of empirical knowledge" that "reasonable insight" to "see" direct, non-speculative understanding, understanding, or proposal must be true I said. Thanks to your explanation, at least I can try my work. I can try my own work. Guidelines absolutely helpful when I start a trip to my doctoral program Knowledge can be received by two sources called empiricism and rationalism. Whether knowledge is empirical or rational, knowledge - derived philosophy is constantly being debated. "In the philosophy of science, empiricism is a knowledge theory emphasizing aspects of scientific knowledge closely related to experience, especially through intentional experimental arrangements" (empiricism). Empiricism is that knowledge can be gained through sensation and knowledge can not be understood without feeling. The rationale is quite different from empirical evidence. It assumes that reason is the source of knowledge. In the opinion of philosophers who support rationalism theory, acquisition of knowledge has three types of knowledge. The first one is to have innate knowledge. They strongly say that innate knowledge is completely different from perceived knowledge. This is true, it can not do anything else

John Locke thinks that in political society people should have more freedom than John Stuartmir. John Roc's "Second Paper of Government" and John Stuart Mill's "Freedom of Expression" outlines the conceptual framework of ideal nations of each thinker, but influential and powerful literature It is a work. Two different views on human nature and its freedom are proposed. John Rock and John Stuart Mill have different views on how much freedom human beings can have in political society. Because they have different views on the basic possibilities of human good and evil behavior and the purpose and purpose of political society. . British, John Rock. John Rock has a philosophical influence on both political theory and theoretical philosophy, and this influence was reflected in the concept of the period between 1789 and 1914 and the concept of human rights equality. John Locke's work has influenced the work of multiple diplomats on freedom and social contract between the society and the government. Rock 's human and power ideology is the foundation of the concept of power separation. As an enlightening thinker, John Locke wrote two articles. John Rock and John Stuart Mill's Freedom Definition John Rock thinks that humans should have more freedom in political society than John Stuart Mir. John Roc's "Second Paper of Government" and John Stuart Mill's "Freedom of Expression" outlines the conceptual framework of ideal nations of each thinker, but influential and powerful literature It is a work. Two different views on human nature and its freedom are proposed. About how John Locke and John Stuart Mill take different views John · Rock John · Rock was born in Somerset in England on August 29, 1632, is a British philosopher and political theorist. Rock was educated at the Oxford Christian church, where he followed a traditional classical course and looked at medicine and science studies and gained a medical degree, but his interest in philosophy was again revealed by Descartes' research I woke up. Then he joined the family of Anthony Ashley Cooper and later became the Count of Shaftesbury who was a private doctor at first. John Rock (1632-1704) was a British philosopher who played an important role in the creation of modern philosophical empathism and political liberalism. Rock proposed individual rights and the concept of social contract - the concept of rights and responsibilities of the government is an influential figure of the Enlightenment and the American Revolution. After the civil war ended in 1646, Rock was sent to Westminster School in London at the age of 14. He was a competent student and was chosen as the king's scholar for his academic record - a form of scholarship. But he did not particularly like the time to go to school; later he criticized public schools to emphasize corporate punishment and dry, narrow academic views, the brochure "Thoughts on Education" (1693) wrote. Locke believes that education should not only promote learning of books but also promote good moral and rational development.

There are many great philosophers from the beginning to the end. Socrates, Thomas · Aquinas, and Descartes lived at different times. This gives each of them different insights to help them create their philosophy and philosophical principles. Every philosopher takes a different approach on how to convey their thoughts and teachings. There are so many differences that the three have one thing in common. Love of wisdom and necessity to share with others. Socrates is a great philosopher of ancient Greece. Socrates is a philosopher who teaches many young people. Socrates taught Plato another great philosopher. This great philosopher lived in the 5 th century BC. Socrates was mistakenly condemned and sentenced to death, but his knowledge still exists. Socrates was born around 470 BC. Socrates was born in a poor family. Socrates was born in the village by the side of Lycabettus. His father is an excellent sculptor. When he got older, his father taught him how to become a sculptor, but his work has not always been accepted from the customer's point of view. His mother is a middle-aged wife. She helped send a lot of children to Athens. In Athens, young people like Socrates usually have a primary level ... show more content Socrates was a great philosopher who had an incredible influence even at that time philosopher and today's philosopher. In the Bethlehem era he lived in Athens from 469 BC to 399 BC. He taught his life philosophy to anyone who cared about listening to him on the street. His philosophy is basically that everyone is responsible for their moral attitude. He is criticizing democracy. He made some simple questions that were difficult for those who were considered sensible at the time. His teachings are based on discovering the truth, understanding life, and talking about elements that make up a better life. Socrates was tried for many accusations of his teaching and philosophy. Who knows that today's Socrates trial has such influence on philosophy? Socrates, an ancient Greek philosopher, said that "uncensored life is not worth living." By definition, philosophers are "lovers of wisdom" (Greek "philo" = love and "sophia" = from wisdom). Even without teaching philosophy, have you ever wondered why many of your professors have a doctorate or "doctorate"? Philosophy is the oldest discipline and there is no natural boundary.

Edgar Malroy will be regarded as the hero of the reader of Skepticism Inc. Edgar receives money from a wealthy church and hands it to the poor. This Robin Hood image makes Edgar various champions. And the reader will eventually protect him through the story. On the surface, the means to take Edgar's money is legal. However, bets never win, and better emotions will affect their ability to make decisions. If there is no clear result, a person can accept a bet by betting on conscience. Before we begin talking about it, this means that we first let you define the history of skepticism and skepticism. Skepticism is a position that philosophers can take and is a measure of doubt to avoid the ultimate truth. Skepticism and Pyronik skepticism are ideas conceived by Ellis Pillow in about 330 B.C. Michael Phillips Professor of Philosophy at Portland State University points out that there is a need to doubt the existence of tangible objects such as food in an article that "skepticism is ridiculous." Basically it is hypocritical to use doubts on something's reality. The biggest skeptics like history such as David Hume, Descartes and Bertrand Russell are puzzled by this funny puzzle. Some philosophers argue that it is possible to accept the tangible world, but they continue to cast doubt on the moral and theoretical parts of life. This question makes us face fundamental skepticism. I will also explain the possibility that it is not very radical but potentially hindered, and the skepticism that is not so skeptical yet. Is there any knowledge of the physical world? Is there scientific knowledge? Is there any knowledge about moral truth? Do not you know the future? It is like this. Let's look at one of them now. This is one of the most famous non-radical skeptics in the world of philosophy - I doubt the knowledge of the outside world. (This is skeptical, in order to deny what most people are accepting, skeptical denial in this sense is amazing.)

I discussed the philosophical significance of Kant's great cosmology in 1755 as "the natural history of the universe". I will discuss how Kant 's interest in Newton' s space powers led to confirm the special version of physics influx theory. Kant's guess about living on other planets as it points out that the important feature of Kant's physics influx theory, the 'flexible movement of the body' is a necessary condition for the possibilities of knowledge It is very important. In general, Kant believes that if it can recognize a deductive principle that the knowledge system can "present intuitively" (4: 471) with a mathematical description, it can only count as science in a truly meaning It is. Therefore, Kant is pessimistic about the possibility that empirical psychology is equivalent to true science. Kant thought that "chemistry is merely systematic art or experimental doctrine, not an appropriate science" (4: 471). Kant's interest in physics theory began very soon. His first work, "A Consideration on the Real Estimation of Vigor" (1749) is the exploration of some basic problems in physics, and it is about how to go about between Leibniz and Descartes Enter "visualization". "(" Energetic ") argument. Quantify the power to move objects (in most cases Kant supports Leibniz) Kant began to investigate purely "transcendental" reasons by establishing his criticisms. He said that there is a boundary and contents. He began looking for restrictions on internal and external content. Kant studied three knowledge systems, mathematics, physical science, metaphysics. Kant said that science must be necessary and universal. This makes mathematics and science reasonable. Kant first broke down judgment into two types of knowledge: analysis and integration. In Prolegomena, Kant criticizes Hume as a mathematical judgment. If he realized this Before Kant, all previous knowledge was thought to have to be analytical. However, Kant believes our mathematical knowledge, the first principles of natural science and metaphysics are a priori and inclusive. Kant believes that the unique nature of this knowledge needs to be urgently explained. Therefore, the core question of criticism is to answer this question: "How is it possible to synthesize a priori judgment?"

The door to Heaven, Hail - the door to Bopp is closed. Door to heaven. This is the greeting you receive when you visit the gate of heaven. This was an unforgettable message when 21 women and 18 men committed suicide on 23, 24, and 25 March 1997. Large-scale suicide took place under the supervision of the cult leader Marshall Herff Applewhite. The gate of Heaven is not the first worship of Applewhite. This is the latest organization among the three organizations established by him and his partner Bonnie Lu Trusdale Nettles. When news of suicide at the door of heaven was reported, it was a new obsession in the United States. We would like to know more about "freaks" who committed suicide to take UFOs. But the most important thing is that you want to know if suicide in the gate of heaven is the starting point of your life or a new tradition. Former cult member Rio Di Angelo's unnatural gentle voice was the first to inform the authorities that members of the Heavenly Gate Cult (Ramot. "Carmichol") had committed a massive suicide. DiAngelo explained the details of the emergency dispatcher and the distribution of the body in the building. Two hours after the first notice (LaMotte. "Calm Call"), the representative of the San Diego County Sheriff did not respond to the Dian Angelo phone until the follow-up call. When the police arrived they found a very troubling place in the Rancho Santa Fe's mansion in California. Descartes has 39 members. Since March 23, 1997, 21 women and 18 men voluntarily committed suicide in three groups (religious tolerance) for three consecutive days. In late March 1997, the members of the cult organization committed suicide for several days. They died in turn, some members helped others to take a lethal mixture of phenobarbital and vodka and then use their lethal mixture doses ("after 1 year" ). The recipe used by the members of the cult seems to come from a book written by Derek Humphry called "Final Exit". This book lists many different suicide mix recipes. However, these mixtures mean death for painless death. Humphrey said: "Sorry - I badly abused my book, my book was abused here just as a gun was abused by murder" (LaMotte's problem) Former members of Wales Cook and Charlie Humphries heavenly gate later committed suicide in a similar way. Humphreys signed a suicide agreement with Cook in May 1997 but eventually committed suicide in February 1998. In April 1997, a 39-year-old Californian man committed suicide as a result of 39 deaths. He left a note that he hoped to join the members of Dead Heaven. Members of the Heavenly Gates believe that the earth is "recycled" ("wiping, updating, playing, playing"), the only possibility of survival is to start immediately. Although the organization is opposed to suicide, they define "suicide" in their context "to oppose the next level when they are offered" and their "human" bodies will travel I believe it is only a ship that will help. In conversation, when pointing to a person or person's body, they often use the word "car"

Is there a conspiracy to suppress "creating science"? Two studies cited in the Genesis literature often insist that there are numerous scientific evidences to support creationism, but secular mainstream scientists suppress publication to peer-reviewed journals It is. They insist that they did not bring fair shakes to the author scientists; they are censored. In fact, creative scientists have not even provided a scientific theory about creation and publication. No doubt, mainstream scientists can not review unsubmitted content. By studying the content of publications submitted by scientists, we can start studying this problem. "Science without religion is insufficient, religions without science are blind," says Albert Einstein. This article focuses on evolution, religion, and creationism. In the first stage, these were defined and later discussed their relationships and controversies. The definitive statement is over. The evolution theory of natural selection was originally proposed by Charles Darwin in 1859 in his book "Origins of Species". In 1930, Darwin 's natural selection and Mendel' s inheritance of freedom formed a contemporary evolutionary comprehension. Its persuasive, this theory provides a unified answer to the diversity of the life on the planet. Evolution is a change in the genetic character of a population inherited from generation to generation. These features are coded as genes that are replicated during reproduction and are transmitted to offspring. Gene mutations and other random changes can create new or altered traits that lead to differences between organisms. Evolution theory and evolution theory explain the fact. Creationism is a myth that explains the facts. Evolutionism is proved by facts, creationism is a story about facts. It is always interesting to learn about science and religion, but it is interesting to understand that science produces facts and that all creationists (religions) can be discussed through evolution theory. Therefore while evolutionists provide evidence, creationists try to try thinkers who challenge the Bible's hypothesis using Galileo, Copernicus, Bacon, Descartes, and empirically inferred scientific theory. . The Catholic Church called this ideology of creationism as heresy and thus has a bad habit of suppressing complete disarray of the Bible to some extent. For centuries the scientific research has evolved into the theory of big bang and evolution, although it is mainly such a place. "The fact of evolution is the backbone of biology and biology is the science's special position based on improved theory, is science or belief?" Charles Darwin Intelligent reason William Dembski said that the origin of life Questions about the origin of the universe says that it must penetrate human thought ... Although for centuries from the future scientific research is mainly to accept this progress, the question of the Big Bang and evolution It has evolved into theory. Tennessee was not the place of 1925. In Dayton, Tennessee, it turned out that the high school biology teacher violated the recently passed law - Butler law -. Because he taught evolution in the classroom.

Game: Enter cognitive and social emotional development windows. We use flavell, miller, and miller to discuss expressions and concepts. An infant creates a psychological expression of event knowledge as a tool to understand the world. Once these are summarized and abstracted, they become scripts. This is adaptable to them as it predicts future events, predicts tracking and participates with others. It provides stability to their world. It is the basis for sharing the social information necessary for social interaction to succeed in a particular culture. Games are extremely important for the development of creativity and imagination as well as the social, emotional, cognitive and physical development of children. Games are important for brain development and certain reasoning abilities. In addition, lack of freedom, spontaneous games may be harmful to developing children. But you and I know this. The future Tom Norquist suggests the relationship between inventions of this generation and the ability of inventors to play freely during their growth. He also asked why politicians and educators seem to forget whether free, unstructured games have a major impact on children's education, social skills, and overall intelligence , Game: Enter cognitive and social emotional development windows. We use flavell, miller, and miller to discuss expressions and concepts. An infant creates a psychological expression of event knowledge as a tool to understand the world. Once these are summarized and abstracted, they become scripts. This is adaptable to them as it predicts future events, predicts tracking and participates with others. It provides stability to their world. - Learning is the cornerstone of American society. It brought society an era of economic darkness, religious resurgence and social instability. Learning has been controversial in the context of learning how to start with human development. As rationalists like Plato and Descartes argue, the results of learning nature are moving towards nature. (Bee & Boyd, 2007), it is rooted in the concept of reasonable view of education ("knowledge is born") Helping children learn and grow through games - Games are one of the main ways that children learn to explore the world and to acquire physical, cognitive, and social emotional abilities It is one. Age-dependent games and physical activities help infants acquire maneuverability, coordination, knowledge of the world, their knowledge, confidence and early social skills. Construction of physical abilities and athletic skills - From infancy to middle age, it refers to the strength, adjustment, and athletic ability necessary for a child to move efficiently and confidently in a disabled environment. Exercise and physical activity can help children build the foundation of this athletic ability and have a basic understanding of how they exercise.

Physical and spiritual notebook question 1: Who is Julie among her novels? Barbara Harris invented the strange case of "Julia and Mary Francis". When Mary Francis went for a walk with the children, the child suddenly started and ran in front of the tram. Julia near me saw what happened, threw himself in front of the child and pushed her to a safe place. Unfortunately, what followed it was a double tragedy. To save the child, Julia fell on the railroad and collapsed on a tram. Mind and body Many contemporary philosophers are discussing the concept of physical and mental interactions. Some people think that our thoughts and bodies are different, so they exist separately, while others think that they exist as a whole. In this article I will present two rationalism philosophical views on this issue. One is Rene Descartes and the other is Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. From a philosophical point of view, rationalists are not complete but acquire knowledge through ... but everyone has their own understanding of what it means. Everyone on this planet is doing some kind of body correction to achieve the sensation they can recognize and feel. Cosmetic to cosmetic surgery, piercing to the face implant, hair styling to the tattoo, everything in between, changing our bodies is part of our lifestyle Whether cosmetic surgery or plastic surgery is beneficial or harm the individual's body or mind. The two major departments of orthopedic surgery are reconstruction and cosmetic ("orthopedic surgeon"). This is why the terms cosmetic and plastics are used interchangeably in the medical field. Cosmetic plastic surgery and reconstructive surgery are not exactly the same, but some think that all surgery is the same. - Do you know that it is one of the highest amount of work a surgeon can earn? Surgeons saved lives most of their lives and are working hard. Pediatric surgeons work exclusively for children and young people. These experts have undergone years of study and hours of training. They are fully committed to that possibility and are constantly committed to helping people. Pediatric surgeons focus on the ability to do what they are doing.

The sign of the sun explains who you are, and this was always myth. In most cases, the fact that the position of the sun and the planet determine the character of a person seems incredible, but most of us firmly agree with our logo. Jane Austen 's famous novel "Emma"' s letters can be identified with their logo due to its unique personality traits. The main character of the novel, I think Erwood House is definitely Leo. "In a wonderful sense, in a wonderful bearing and personal tolerance, the young lion is the monarch of mankind." "I think that the world is a beautiful place, I think that there are ever-happy and miraculous moments as you accept it.We believe in the good of humanity.I believe love is the most powerful in the universe "Iconoclast's Gregory Burns author says that neuroscientists have made it a different way of thinking." Perception is the brain The most likely explanation is the ambiguous visual signal Is interpreted. These explanations are a direct result of past experience. Experience has fixed the connection so that neurons can process the information more efficiently. " A dualist like Descartes believes that the mind is separated from the brain. Singles believe that the mind and the brain are the same. There are some intermediate ideas to judge this to make things more complicated. "If someone asked me to define the coastline, I insisted that I should say that the coast is beach and sea, whether it is water or sand," Siegel I said. "You can not limit the understanding of our coastline, I insist that it is either one, I start thinking, maybe the heart is like a coastline." Of course, this does not mean that the way we learn knowledge is based on running sand. As Graham Priest (1998) indicated, it is unreasonable to believe that I am an omelet. To make matters worse, I believe that it is fried eggs and fried eggs. Therefore, it is very important to give sufficient weight in at least some contradictions, otherwise our daily world can not be rationally understood and negotiated. (Priest, 1998, p. 410) However, as the pastor emphasizes, not believing all contradictions but some inconsistencies and illegal slides between "some" and "all" are big There is a difference Local is "Question ..." (ibid)

Science magazine records evolutionary creation controversy since publication in 1880. The reference number per year indicates the severity of the public debate. Peaks occurred in the Scopes test (1925) and California states (1979-1981), Arkansas state (1981), and Louisiana (1982-1987) tests. Evolutionists directly win the latest three, public opinion mainly supports science with a scope trial, but in a recent case the disagreement of the opinion of the Supreme Court promoted a new creative activity - the intelligent design movement It seems. In the last century and a quarter of a century the argument changed slightly. The fundamentalism of teaching evolution is still very strong. Scientists have always proposed better education as a means of solving conflict, but so far the evidence does not support this position. The difference between science and fundamentalism seems to be conflicting, and hot arguments have no obvious end. In the early 1980s, the Louisiana Legislature passed a law called "Balanced Cure Treatment - Science and Evolution - Science Act". This law calls for not teaching evolution theory or creationism but also teaching creationism when teaching evolution theory. Creationists actively encouraged the law and believed that the act was about the academic freedom of faculty and the argument that the state supported the bill. The lower court ruled that the actual purpose of the country is to promote the creation of scientific religious teachings, but the state appealed to the Supreme Court. Does legislation in Louisiana state take a balanced approach to creating science and evolutionary science in violation of the founding provision of the first amendment? Louisiana State Council founded Louisiana State Balance Treatment Creation for Public School Education Act - Science and Evolution - Science. This law prohibits education of evolution theory and "creative science" theory in public elementary and junior high schools unless accompanied by other theoretical guidance. building Evolution theory and evolution theory are facts explaining theory. Creationism is a myth that explains facts. Evolutionism is proved by facts, creationism is a story about facts. While there has always been discussion between science and religion, it is interesting to understand that science creates the fact that all creationists (religions) can do to demonstrate the theory of evolution theory. Therefore evolutionists provide evidence and creationists try to try other thinkers who challenge the Bible's hypothesis using Galileo, Copernicus, Bacon, Descartes, and empirically inferred scientific theory . The Catholic Church persecutes this ideology of creationism, calls it the heresy, and therefore has a troubling habit of suppressing the complete confusion of the Bible to some extent. For the next century, scientific research has evolved into the theory of big bang and evolution, although it is mainly such a place.

In today's pace and technology-savvy society, everyone is looking for state-of-the-art technology and the next big event's desire is to change the technology sector most quickly, making it the fast growing sector I will. In myriad movies, television programs, novels, the characters of humanoids, which are the actual machine functions to learn artificial intelligence and new skills, are appearing. The problem with these programs is that the performance of contemporary artificial intelligence is greatly distorted and these machines have a personality and emotions that are only relevant to humans when they are very complex computer programs. My artificial intelligence (AI) research is centered on the idea that advanced cognitive machines use intuition as the basis of intelligence (see "Artificial intuition"). Our own human idea provides sufficient evidence of general intelligence. Humans are basically intuitive machines and our rational (conscious) self is a mere intuitive machine-based simulation (see "Cognitive Stack"). This is in contrast to Descartes' famous "Kosito Ego sum". In other words, our rational way of thinking separates us from biology. Therefore, in order to require methods and methods driven by logical mechanisms, cognitive bias is required. This is certainly the reason why Good Old Fashion AI (GOFAI) has failed for decades. I am trying to solve intelligent problems from formal logic as a starting point. Artificial intelligence (AI) provides the ability to perform intelligent tasks such as inference and learning from experiences to a computer or computer controller. Cognitive computing is a term that started ten years ago. In the face of cognitive overload, it is necessary to support decision making. Relying on AI digital assistants such as Syria and Alexa, we have given clear benefits of current artificial intelligence and help us make simple decisions. In a recent discussion, the definition of a generally accepted definition of artificial intelligence (AI) is the theme of the Renaissance. Some people change the name of AI's "cognitive computing" or "machine intelligence", some people mistakenly exchange AI as "machine learning". This is one reason why AI is not technology. In fact, it ranges from a wide range of fields, from robotics to machine learning. For the most part of us we are convinced that the ultimate goal of artificial intelligence is to build a machine that performs tasks and cognitive functions that are otherwise within the scope of human intelligence. In order to achieve this goal, you need to be able to learn these functions automatically, rather than programming each function explicitly end-to-end.

Definition of Psychology The term psychology comes from two Greek words. In human heart psychoanalysis, thinking is the center of thought, emotion, and action. And according to the logo, "research" or modern research "science", these roots were first combined in the 16th century, human soul, spirit and thought seemed different from the body. Psychology definition: Psychology is one of the youngest science. Running Head: Definition of Cognitive Psychology 1 Definition of Cognitive Psychology Heather Burgess PSY 360 October 24, 1013 Dr. Matt Pearcey Definition of Cognitive Psychology 2 Definition of Cognitive Psychology Cognitive psychology involves learning, memory, perception And a study of the psychological process of thinking. Relatively speaking, it is still relatively new, as an official department of psychology, its roots can be traced back to Descartes, which tries to explain how thought works and "hydraulic system of neural function" We propose analogy. 2007, page 26) After he observed the animated statue of Saint-Germain-en-Laye. It is not only a constant pursuit of how the mind works, but also a merciless pursuit of the spiritual composition that ultimately forms the basis of cognitive theory. It is clear that different approaches are needed when psychologists study how psychological processes produce behavior. It only thinks of what I learned through rewards and punishments. In 1929, psychology was defined as a study of consciousness. From 1930 to around 1970, the definition of psychology changed as the treatment of scientific research on behavior increased. Since around 1970, psychology has been defined as a scientific research on behavioral and psychological processes. But according to the definition of psychology today, it can be defined as a study of behavior and human thought. Factors Affecting Behavior Shauna Carton Psy 490 May 13, 2014 Lena Klumper Diversity of Psychology The American Psychological Association identified 54 departments in the field of psychology (Plante, 2011) . Each department is derived from one of seven key ideas: psychodynamics, behavioral science, humanities, cognition, social chemistry, biology, progress. This diversity in psychology,

A strange but interesting idea that philosophers demand discussion is human nature. Although each philosopher may have its own perception of human nature, philosophers tend to share some of the same basic attributes in their definition. I finally thought that both philosophers believed that humans could exist without meat after reading Plato's five dialogues and Descartes six meditations. There are lots of information about humanity, but for me, one thing stands out very well. It is that humans do their best for their best interests. Even if you think that they are not the story of Harrison and Bergeron, I will prove that they returned to you. I will tell you some of the personal character that really appears through this short story. Even if the use of the material is used to better or help other people, Scrooge will even see the use of the least waste or materials as a means of dismissal There is no doubt that humans will be better. In other words, according to this logic, human true nature must be moral. Because humans can be polished and polished no matter how small they are. If humans continue to yield to all their desires like most animals, they will eventually be overcome by them and will be regarded as immoral by society. Because people are not naturally good at restraining many of the desires of our social taboo desires, they must learn to do so by experienced people like saints. Therefore, people will learn how to suppress their infinite desires, and as time went by, it became a king of saints, so it will be the second character of ordinary people . This discussion of Xunzi can definitely be regarded as a complete discussion, but it is still not enough to prove that humans are inherently evil. Certainly humanity respects these two activities through well-designed rituals and high consideration for the spirit of nature. Certainly, in human society, hunting and gathering activities involve specialization of male hunting and women gathering. Unlike most animals, humans do not bring food back home, they take them home and share it. This change occurred only 10,000 years ago when people first discovered ways to grow crops and livestock. This is the most important development in human history. What happened during the stone age is that the tool was not a metal but a meteorite. However, it was a boundary line separating the Paleolithic (Paleolithic) era and Neolithic (Neolithic) era. It is correctly called the Neolithic Revolution

Discussion about John Rock (1632 - 1704), American Experience from Thomas Jefferson to Martin Luther King Jr from Elizabeth Keyston to Martin Luther King Jr, chosen from the government's second paper (1690) as we study Definition. The theme is a democratic revolution. These and other key figures will change the existing social structure, expand the democratic circle, and include many people in a democratic framework that recognizes the basic equality and rights of each member. John Rock and John Stuart Mill's Freedom Definition John Rock thinks that humans should have more freedom in political society than John Stuart Mir. John Roc's "Second Paper of Government" and John Stuart Mill's "Freedom of Expression" outlines the conceptual framework of ideal nations of each thinker, but influential and powerful literature It is a work. Two different views on human nature and its freedom are proposed. About how John Locke and John Stuart Mill take different views British, John Rock. John Rock has a philosophical influence on both political theory and theoretical philosophy, and this influence was reflected in the concept of the period between 1789 and 1914 and the concept of human rights equality. John Locke's work has influenced the work of multiple diplomats on freedom and social contract between the society and the government. Rock 's human and power ideology is the foundation of the concept of power separation. As an enlightening thinker, John Locke wrote two articles. John · Rock John · Rock was born in Somerset in England on August 29, 1632, is a British philosopher and political theorist. Rock was educated at the Oxford Christian church, where he followed traditional classical courses and gained a medical degree with a focus on medicine and science studies, but the interest in philosophy was awakened again by Descartes' research It was. Then he joined the family of Anthony Ashley Cooper and later became the Count of Shaftesbury who was a private doctor at first.

BL.INK thinks linking is important, but this is not surprising. We are not alone. Many companies of all sizes use links every day, but we still see some of the world's largest brands making the most basic mistakes on short links. Let us take a step forward [...] Now that you notice that there are four links here, only two changes were made to the appearance when converting between sections. However, in the frame chart, you can see that all four links are rendered every time. This is because the pure component is not optimized because the component creates a new function in rendering and passes it to prop every time. The cause seems to be inside onLeaveWithTracking. It tracked by code search. If you look closely at these call stacks, I noticed that most of the time I spent actually lies in React's setState, but, oddly enough, that re-rendering is not actually done here There is. Uh It sounds easy. Yes, yes, no. To illustrate the new rules, you need four diagrams to illustrate how to "utilize tweets". Simplified? This seems relatively complicated in reality. Four graphics in the comic = good. Four graphics for creating BILLY IKEA bookshelf = wonderful. Four graphics explaining the new 'simplification' rule on Twitter - complex I guess the personal truth and the effective relationship between them. This method basically consists of a series of practical hints or heuristics to help intuition and reasoning as it passes through the network. The bulk of this method - most of the way - is also engraved in the text Weber called Rule 4A. In Descartes, most of the rules of Mind Direction and the texts of Rules 1 - 3 are inserted. Many contemporary scholars believe that macroscopically fixed dogmas of scientific methods such as "freedom" can not guide and guide lives now. Practice in any specific research field as well as the entire subject field Newton invented a truly universal scientific method in that area. Newton used his methodology as a set of four rules for scientific reasoning. These rules are stated in Principia and (1) we do not recognize further natural causes such as being truthful and enough to explain the cause of nature, (2) same nature for the same cause The quality of the body should be considered universal, and (4) propositions derived from observation phenomena should be considered accurate until other phenomena are inconsistent with it .

I will explore the famous and unusual quotes of Rene de Carte. Share quotes from Rene Descartes on mathematics, science, and dreams. "What will everyone definitely do? "For me, literature is a commitment to thinking, we read literature, discover ideas and learn.We will write about it to discover and nurture my idea.What is the idea to read and write A person who does not have it can go, If you go too far without this, I will cause this big mess and confusion suddenly overcome me, I just need to write it somehow (Philosophical Prose, Story, Poetry, Scribbles) It is a phrase that is the reason why literature can appear in many ways, such as poetry or short essay, sonnet or novel, sestina or short story, etc. All literature is this It has a common theme of the idea, it is part of the learning process, literature can teach a lot of things, literature can teach individuals and the whole society Past and present, and you can teach to the future. Personal learning is essentially a thought about deep resonance, which stimulates the discovery of more wishes. I have been thinking about writers and thinkers who motivated me to write my own ideas in the past year by impressing me and resonating. These are not all of the ideas released in 2017 the first time, but that was the year that I read them (or possibly reread them). As Leonard Cohen observed in another context in the past, the reader's interpretation of these ideas may be heavily dependent on your politics. This is an unintelligible concept, as its complete meaning is to transcend the narrow range of concepts, thoughts, words and thoughts. Briefly, it is to discover, reveal and taste the essence of things. In all of them, subtle, rich, beautiful and sharp. Craft beer is more than just better beer - it is more authentic beer. From a nutritional point of view, elegant chocolate is not good - it is more realistic, more demanding and more delicate. From Brooklyn, everything from the above to books, books, and shoes brings things back to something.

Metaphysical metaphysics is a philosophical study aimed at determining the true nature of things and determining the meaning, structure, and principles of things. (Britannica.com). Therefore, if the sole purpose of metaphysics is to determine the true meaning of things, but there is nothing absolutely, what is the purpose of metaphysics? The essence of the world may change constantly. Even when born in your family, depending on some generation of the world (for example "First philosophy" is a reference to metaphysics. Therefore, according to the full title of the book, "meditation" is a book focusing on metaphysics, more specifically a book on metaphysical problems. The type of book is a sort of meditation - not discourse or discourse - it puts a job on the first person, and the reader is guided through so - called insight through the direct discovery process to so - called insight. In the letter to Mason, we learned the importance of Descartes in choosing this type: • The terms metaphysics and metaphysics of poetry are the result of the Renaissance tree matured too close to pure science. The term metaphysics is beyond = RMB and can be interpreted as physical property = physics. The term metaphysics is defined by various writers. R. S Hillyer wrote that John Donne is a classic representative of metaphysical poetry. His instinct forced him to bring in all his experience to his poetry through his knowledge and wonderful thought and to pick the most direct and natural expression. He is a wonderful genius and it can be said that it is the power to imagine a new creative work It gives us some new ideas and memories. In all his poems, he is depiction, rhetoric, and controversy. This type of poetry is filled with passion John Dorn is known as a metaphysical poet. Because his poems reveal all the features that we normally associate with metaphysical poetry. John Donne is the main poet of metaphysical poetry. He has metaphysics in the following sense: 1. He is metaphysical as his poetry is implicitly filled. Concert is a remarkable feature of metaphysical poetry. Conceit has a lot of connections between various things. John Dawn is hidden in his poem. In Validism forbidding mourning, he compared his wife and himself with the feet of the compass. The image is another feature of metaphysical poetry. John Dorn used most of the image in the poem. He uses a specific image instead of an abstract image. His images come from philosophy, science, religion, voyage, alchemy, and so on. Wit is a symbol of metaphysical poetry. John Donne is known as a witty monarch. Dorn's wisdom belongs to the class. 4. 5. 6. 7

Spinoza's mind theory is totally representative mind theory. For Spinoza psychology is only representative content. In Ethics 2p7, he argues that "the order and connection of thinking is consistent with the order and connection of things", that is, parallel ideas exist for each extended objective. This is called parallel processing. From this point of view, Spinoza can develop his theory of mind: "The first thing that makes up the actual existence of human thought is only the concept of a single existing thing" (2 p 11) . Each heart is an idea that has its own object in itself - in the case of a human being, the mind is the thought of the body and everything that happens in the body is expressed in the mind (he discussed in 2 p 12 and 2 p 13 like) . The mind is a special idea representing a single object, the body in which it is parallel. (Please refer to Della Rocca 1996 for details on Spinoza's representative mind theory.) In this article, I will study Spinoza's mind and body theory, first explain various interpretations of his mind and body theory, such as homosexuality, idealism, classicism, materialism and so on. From critical comments on these inappropriate explanations, Spinoza 's argument about mind - body relationships should be understood as a non - causal relationship between the mind and the body, and they have the same weight I will. Parallel interpretation is compatible with the above understanding, but traditional parallelization can not be attributed to Spinoza. His parallelism arises from his argument about identity between the mind and the body, and this assertion is based on his material monism and attribute binaryism. Therefore, we should understand Spinoza's mind and body theory as identity theory. It leads to a parallel relationship between the mind and the body. For Spinoza, the human body has extended attributes, human thought has attributes of thought and expression. Also, the mind and body may express the possibilities of reality in parallel, or the mind and body may be the same substance (substance) considered under different attributes. In the language Spinoza inherited from Descartes, the idea is an expression of ideas. This led to Spinoza's famous conclusion that the human heart is equivalent to the human mind. The parallelism of Spinoza also means that every change in the human body must accompany a change in human thought. "Everything that happens to the subject of thinking that constitutes human thought must be perceived by human thought, that is, if the object constitutes the human mind, the concept is the body, Nothing happens to the body that is not perceived in its mind (Part 2, Proposition 12).

Influential time has brought a new past to children of this generation. In the talk show capture, people became the most worried and most recognized people. Notoriously Jerry Springer Show. The Jerry Springer Show complements the possibility of contaminating airlines with adverse materials. Because it contains ingredients that affect their behavior unacceptable to their guests, the program may have devastating effects on children. Unlike those who feel that this program is an important source of entertainment, many adult viewers believe that these guests are valued and used for income. "As the body of the machine" can be traced back to the Fabrica of Vesalius, the most influential western anatomical text of the past three centuries, where veins, arteries and nerves are described as hollow tubes like pipes It has been. These conduits are said to work with pneumatic devices that move fluids. Almost a century later, René Descartes (1596-1650) declared that "the body is considered a machine" and clearly compared the placement of body organs as "automatic machine" or "mobile machine". Giorgio Baglivi (1668-1706) is an Italian doctor and scientist known for deepening this metaphor and distinguishing between smooth muscle and striated muscle. Baglivi believes that the body consists of many small machines: teeth as scissors, viscera and glands as sieves, hearts and blood vessels as aquatic plants, and stomach as a flask The spider's torso consists of the rear abdomen connected by the anterior chest and the stem. Head and chest have brain, stomach, and normal venom glands. The digestive tract, blood vessels, nerve cord and some muscles pass through the stem. The abdomen contains the heart, digestive system, reproductive system, lung or trachea, trachea and silk gland. It is only divided among a few groups of Southeast Asian spiders. The back end usually has six spinnerets with faucets, each with a different type of wire Egg It is a long tube that supplies blood through many blood vessels. There are many glands on its wall that produce proteins, shells, and shells. In the non-stratum, the fallopian tube is very short and the diameter is small. However, once the reproductive system is activated it grows to 70-80 cm and has different diameters depending on the function of the part being examined. Funnel (or funnel): Located near the ovary and having a long segment surrounding the ovary, the funnel is released as a funnel from the follicle and collects egg yolks after being directed to the fallopian tube. This part of the wall is very thin, 6 to 9 cm long. Male sperm are fertilized here with eggs.

"The three main points of Christian theology are definitely the doctrine of the three gods, the word of God appears in the flesh of Christ, and God is the beginning of love in the church and its members There is no doubt that the Three Gods who ask the church to transcend the hearts of the Catholic priests "God's Word" means that faith and faith are the pillars of understanding in the Catholic tradition It means. Faith and rational beliefs and reasons can be regarded as opposite. Faith is an element of faith, and individuals do not necessarily need reasons without acknowledging the reason. For example, when a person tries to explain them, they believe that God's reason does not seem reasonable. They may not even be criticized. The reason is built as an expression, on the other hand. Faith is basically what we believe, just as we have learned in the church. What is the reason? Faith and reason are two ideologies that exist in different levels of conflict or compatibility. The reason is based on reasons and facts. Faith is inspiration, revelation, or believe in authority. The term faith may refer to a belief that lacks reasons or evidence, regardless of reason or evidence, or against it. The Catholic Church also teaches that true faith and right reasons can work together and must work. . John Paul II, Fides et Ratio ("Faith and Reason") Faith alone - perhaps like those who believe that only faith can earn salvation - believers of faith - often means to insist on faith rather than reason. Believing that the universe is a wise place, our idea leads us to the right conclusion about it. That is a belief we have through faith. Rationalists believe that this is not because they have faith, but because they observe the world consistently wise. Faith as Potential Rationality: In this view, all human knowledge and reason is believed to depend on faith. Faith in our senses, faith in our rationality, faith in our memories, and beliefs in the explanation of events that other people take. Therefore, faith is considered reasonably necessary condition, it is inseparable. According to René Descartes, the reason is based on the realization of the absolute truth, "I think it is what I am doing" absolutely first, it does not require faith. Faith and reason are two modes of belief that dominates the history of Western civilization. In Greece - Roman times and Jewish - Christian era, both faith and reason came into use as a tool to understand the universe. Through these conflicting conflicts, these two belief models caused many controversies. Rationality or reason is a belief based on concrete evidence and logic. The development of human reasons is highly dependent on observation and questions. Greek and Roman philosophers believe in this power

On the scene, two men were standing in the "monument route". After the buildings and houses once existed, only rubble reminds people a small village 8 km north of Arras. If it is not the title and location provided by Richard, the location of the image can not be determined. Sadly, this scene is not unique The small villages and big cities along the Western Front have been seriously damaged by artillery and artillery. According to the unified design of cameramen, these people are members of a French soldier, an ally allied wearing a light blue coat after successfully attacking Sochi in 1915. Art sufferings during the First World War Bloody washout of the Battlechendaele campaign played a decisive role for young artists like Paul Nash. In an angry letter to his wife Margaret, he explained that the war is 'in words, no gods, hopeless'. That fear is so great that he does not consider himself an "intriguing and intriguing artist" but is a "user who brings back people who are fighting people who want to sustain the war forever" . Messenger. "From the beginning of the Second World War, we need new and spicy art. To express "real" combat experience, you need to attack visual, olfactory, auditory, taste, and tactile sensations. It demands artists to visualize the sound of grenade explosion, the bad smell of explosives, the metallic taste of blood, and the splashing of human bones, muscles, tissues, skin, hair and fat. I believe that understanding this handwriting technique has extensive relationship with Beckett's third novel "Watt". In his another letter, Beckett merely wrote it as a movement simply written to kill time between World War II and Parisian occupation, which was written in "spotting", in particular at himself Wat's early critic who deteriorates Wat's appearance seems to have internalized the philosophy of René Descartes, and as he analyzed his experience according to the ruthless Cartesian logic that eventually is debilitating and interesting wrote. It is absurd. Watann seems unable to think, he can only count. One thing in the novel is that Mr. Watt was hired by Mr. Knott and left cooking in the empty room to serve his dinner and then Mr. Knut had already eaten his dinner, I did not eat or had all of this

In a letter on tolerance, John Roc explains why it is impossible for someone to force Christians against their will, and rock writer Christians believe that all religious beliefs are true I admit it. Overall, his letter provides reasons for acceptance of other religious beliefs. The main argument of the letter is an irrational argument, but it also includes other arguments such as non-Christian debates and contradictory discussions. 154 Jeremy Waldron, God's Rock and Equality: Christian Foundation of John Rock's Political Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), 211. In his second letter, Waldron cited Locke wrote as follows, "This is not for the magistrate or any other body. When imagining its usefulness, we Led by writers and terminators rather than faith - John Rock, second letter of acceptance, Volume 6, John Rock 's "Volume 10", 12th edition (London: Thomas Davidson, 1823), 81 British, John Rock. John Rock has a philosophical influence on both political theory and theoretical philosophy, and this influence was reflected in the concept of the period between 1789 and 1914 and the concept of human rights equality. John Locke's work has influenced the work of multiple diplomats on freedom and social contract between the society and the government. Rock 's human and power ideology is the foundation of the concept of power separation. As an enlightening thinker, John Locke wrote two articles. John Rock and John Stuart Mill's Freedom Definition John Rock thinks that humans should have more freedom in political society than John Stuart Mir. John Roc's "Second Paper of Government" and John Stuart Mill's "Freedom of Expression" outlines the conceptual framework of ideal nations of each thinker, but influential and powerful literature It is a work. Two different views on human nature and its freedom are proposed. About how John Locke and John Stuart Mill take different views John · Rock John · Rock was born in Somerset in England on August 29, 1632, is a British philosopher and political theorist. Rock was educated at the Oxford Christian church, where he followed traditional classical courses and gained a medical degree with a focus on medicine and science studies, but the interest in philosophy was awakened again by Descartes' research It was. Then he joined the family of Anthony Ashley Cooper and later became the Count of Shaftesbury who was a private doctor at first.

Influence of George Berkeley George Berkeley (1685-1753) is a pastoralist and a philosopher of Ireland at Trinity College, Ireland, where he completed a famous work on unimportant importance (believe everything) They are all substance recognition and exist only if perceived. Coleridge himself acknowledged the influence of Berkeley on his work, especially his poem "This Lime Tree Pavilion" and wrote a letter to Robert Sauce in July 1797. The first poem is accompanied by the following comment: "You remember, I am a Berklein." We can see the impact of Berkeley. George Berkeley is one of the three most famous British experiences. (The other two are John Locke and David Hume.) Berkeley presented his early visual work (an article on new visual theory, 1709) and metaphysics (a paper on the principle of human knowledge, 1710; between Hilas and Filonas Dialog, 1713). Berkeley 's empirical vision theory challenges the current distance vision standards, which argues that it requires implicit geometric calculations. His alternative account focuses on visual and tactile objects. Berkeley believes that visual recognition of distance is explained by the interrelationship between vision and tactility. This association method eliminates the attractiveness of geometric computation and explains the illusion of monocular view and moon that plagued the geometric explanation. I will calculate. Berkeley's 1709 publication only shows the beginning of the extreme idealistic view advocated by George Berkeley. Although Berkeley's view seemed unlikely at first at first, the idealistic theory he claimed was the only theory to avoid skepticism and dictatorship, it is difficult to give up, and ultimately the real meaning It was logical. Four years after publishing "Transfer of a thesis to a new visual theory", Berkeley revealed the most important philosophical work among his careers. Bishop of the 18th century philosopher George Berkeley showed a similar view in his idealistic theory. Berkeley said that the reality is equivalent to a psychological image - our spiritual image is not the copies of other material reality, but the reality itself. But Berkeley has a distinct difference between the image that he believes to make up the outside world and the image of personal imagination. According to Berkeley, in the modern sense only the latter is considered a "psychological image". Soon after Descartes came to George Berkeley. Berkeley accused the view of the realist. For Berkeley, the presence of important things (like trees) is meaningless. Presence can come to us only through thinking (not a physical experience), thinking must exist in assimilation of thought. The material purpose is deceiving, its essence is not meat, it is the ability to change importance. If the idea is not assimilated into thinking, it does not exist. Therefore, he recognized the Latin phrase esse percepi:.

Age of Enlightenment is also known as "Rational Age" in Europe from the 17th century to the 18th century. This is an exercise to emphasize the use of reason and science in the world. In addition, it is to inspire and clarify the use of factual reasoning and to promote the use of evidence in doing things. Philosophers of the time and famous philosophers of the time, such as Voltaire, Diderot, D'Alembert, Descartes, Montesquieu etc, began to understand and promote inference beyond traditional ways. 59 The age of enlightenment is also called era of reason and refers to the time to lead the movement of ideology called enlightenment. During enlightenment, people insisted rationality as a means of establishing authoritative aesthetics, ethics, government and even religion. Some people believe that the reasons allow people to get an objective truth about reality - <http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Age_of_Enlightenment> (May 5, 2010 Day access). It can be said that 60 Hobbes, Rock and Rousseau between them made the most important contribution to the development of liberalism by announcing some pioneering work on liberalism. These works are J Rousseau Social Contract, two articles on citizen's government by T Hobbes Leviathan, J Locke. Later philosophers such as Kant and Rawls further developed these views. The focus is different from philosophers and philosophers, but the central idea of ​​social contract remains unchanged. Many critical thinkers believed that religion and reason are hostile in the age of enlightenment in the 17th and 18th centuries. For them, the Middle Ages or the "era of faith" is therefore the opposite of the era of reason. Kant and Voltaire were attacking the Middle Ages as an era of religious decline, and Jimbo in the "History of the decline and decline of the Roman Empire" expressed their contempt for "garbage in the dark ages". But like Petrarch, he saw himself at the cutting edge of the "new era" and criticized it for centuries before his own time, as was the enlightenment writer . The enlightenment of French literature in the era of intelligent era and rationalism is the period after the classical era of France in the 1700s. During this time philosophers have focused on rationality as the best way to learn. It explores education, law philosophy and political issues. It attacks tyranny, social injustice, superstition, and ignorance. In this time, progress has been made in the fields of anatomy, astronomy, chemistry, mathematics and physics. - French Neoclassicalism In the 17th century, the era of the King Louis XIV, we saw the era of neoclassical ideals, the three largest masters of France, Corneille, Racine and Molière. With the decline of the religious play in the middle of the 16th century, French play slowly developed. The French Renaissance began in 1630 and ended in 1700

In 1760, it was widely believed to be the beginning of the industrial revolution. In fact, the revolution began more than two centuries before this date. Between the late eighteenth and early nineteenth century, ideas and discoveries of people who have lived for a long time, such as Galileo, Bacon, and Descartes, appeared. The UK is considered to be the birthplace of the industrial revolution. In fact, from 1760 to 1830, industrialization was largely confined to the UK. Recognizing the start, the UK monopolized industrialization, banning the export of machinery, skilled workers and manufacturing systems. Between 1760 and 1830, the Industrial Revolution was largely confined to the UK. Knowing their opportunities, the UK banned the export of machinery, skilled workers and manufacturing technology. In particular the British monopoly can not last forever because some European business people tried to attract British expertise to their country and some British people saw advantageous industrial opportunities abroad . Two Britons, William and John Corker, brought the industrial revolution to Belgium by developing a machining factory in Liège (around 1807), Belgium became the first economically transformed country on the European Continent. Like British ancestors, the Belgian Industrial Revolution concentrates on iron, coal and textiles. Many authors believe that the industrial revolution can be divided into clearly distinguishable parts. For example, the first industrial revolution from 1760 to 1830, followed by the second industrial revolution since 1850 (such as David Landes). The first industrial revolution began with the mechanization of the textile industry, the development of steelmaking technology, and the use of refined coal. Trade 4 The Luddite movement began in 1811 with the name from the early Ned Ludd. The movement was very strong, there was a conflict in the fight against the British army, some of which were sentenced to death. Since then, the term Luddite has been used to describe people who oppose technological advances and technology changes.

As a psychological structure, Self has long dominated psychology and management theory of human behavior. In fact, self is one of the most widely studied concepts in social science. It is not surprising that self is an essential concern to the theme of research, considering that self is considered an important place for human motivation, institution, judgment and decision-making . This entry first describes some of the outstanding definitions and concepts about self and summarizes some of the main structures associated with it. The next section details why the theory about self and self is very important for organization theory and management practice. In the Conclusion section we will outline some of the latest and important advances in self concepts and their roles in organizational life. Psychologists such as society, personality, education are interested in self-concept, and most of research and theory can help explain the formation of self-concept. . Self-conceptual theory, social role theory control theory, self-regulation, self-differentiation theory, social comparison theory, self-evaluation maintenance model, social identity theory. In this paper, we compare these two theories, social identity theory and social comparison theory, and explain the formation of social concept. Finally, while examining the similarities and differences between the two theories, we will explore some important strengths and weaknesses. In order to study this theory, we first need to understand the history of the development of self-conceptual theory. The earliest milestone in self conceptualism was Rene Descartes, and it suggested that the existence of a person depends on the way he sees it. Sigmund Freud is one of the most famous psychologists and advocates a number of theories to talk about our internal psychological processes. In his theory, we are considered to have three main aspects, id (happiness oriented), self (balance between id and superego), and super ego (led conscience). The different view of self and the integration of self and society influence our human concept of our own existence. The essence of self includes the various concepts of reality and how our perception is determined and affected by the nature of self-organization. Religion requires religious morals and beliefs in our lives, assuming the concept of the soul is the essential nature of self. Dialogue self-theory (DST) is a combination of two concepts of self and dialogue, which can enhance understanding of mutual relations between self and society. Usually, self-concept refers to what is "internal", what occurs in the mind of an individual, and the dialogue is often related to the process that takes place among people participating in "external" communication There is. The compound concept "Conversation Self" goes beyond its own dichotomy, injects the interior externally, and vice versa, introducing the interior externally. As a "spiritual society", the ego is filled with various "self positions", it is possible to entertain and interact with each other.

At some point, we all want to get something. As a human being our perfect helpless occasionally make us hopeless. The desperation of the era that we are deeply in need is human nature and our despair as a human being is not solved until we feel secure. In order to heal our despair, we must tell others about their needs. Regardless of whether we communicate spiritually, physically, or both, humans are social creatures and prosper in communication. In the poems of John Donne and Stevie Smith, the writer captures a really helpless personality through their desperate poetry characters. Human beings are historically interested scholars. Many people have discussed the essence of human beings, that is, the unique characteristics that human beings originally possess, but on the other hand, the answer to the question "what is human" can not be realized, or the value at all We have carefully studied the fact that there is no. Pursuit. Shakespeare explores human problems with his tragedy, King Lear. - Aristotle and "Nigo Maha Ethics Book" In the first volume of Aristotle's ethics, Aristotle pointed out that the ultimate goal or end point of humanity is happiness. Aristotle explains the steps necessary for human beings to gain happiness. Aristotle pointed out that activities are an important requirement for happiness. He said that happy people can not become inactive. Then he continued to say that life in virtue is itself fun. Kind people are satisfied with doing good deeds Humanity is the sum of our species identity, human identity, spirit, human spiritual, physical and mental characteristics. Plato and Aristotle depict humanity with different definitions and features; Plato emphasizes psychological / spiritual characteristics, arguing that Aristotle can not separate the mind and body. Since then, the definition has been split among people who believe the body is part of the human nature and those who believe the body is predominantly a human container. Thinkers like Aristotle, Darwin, Sartre, Lyle think about the thought and body related to the world, Plato, Descartes, Freud and Judaism - Christian religious thought - human beings are primarily intangible Link together - Often called spirit, essence, or mind

Recognizing this human despair, humanity discovered his kingdom in this world. Yes, this world is a temporary kingdom, and he will eventually lose this kingdom, but this is his only possible world. This knowledge caused him frustration and terrible emotions. And it leads to passionate responsibility to life and all that can be offered. Therefore, it brings about the same passionate rebellion against death and all that may justify it. Absurd human condition is dramatically expressed in the experience of one of the strangers. Note: The coronation ceremony is named after the philosopher Albert Camas. He makes different interpretations of absurd views. However, it is generally considered that absurdity is a confrontation between self and the world. Absurdity is the difference between desire and material reality. The Camus system wants to provide the user with the difference between the desire for the result of the data and the actual situation. Albert Camus, a famous French philosopher and existentialist of the 20th century, discussed the struggle between the meaning sought by humans and the lack of a global essential meaning known as "absurd" . The coronation acknowledges the anxiety after the desire for meaningless meaning in the universe, but if it is truly known to be ridiculous, it will be free if confronted. He said, "Returning to consciousness and escape from everyday sleep is the first step of absurd freedom." Here he says he will become more aware of the surroundings if he notices absurdity Opening your eyes and your situation (living in a world without inner meaning), you can create meaning in the face of absurd reality by "rebelling" this situation. Albert Camus noticed that human condition is unbelievably ridiculous (I can not agree when the Oxford Dictionary gave them the 2016 vocabulary "post-true"). He condemns absurd grounds between the deep friction between human appetite and internal meaning and what we can not find at all: a coronation project coexists with an absurd fact; a reality And inconsistent contradiction between human consciousness and all pieces implied by two big power meetings ignited everything that Camu proved for the inaugural question: why? He wrote: One of my favorite things is Albert Camus, which explains the absurdity as a metaphysical tension arising from conflict between our conscious facts and the facts Descartes speaks. Camus said the reality of our consciousness is related to the fact that we are in a meaningless life. This has no meaning. Considering our position in space and what happens in the universe, it is difficult to find sensible meanings. The whole field of philosophy is called nihilism. Nietzsche is talking about where we are and what it means, and you draw out a cold conclusion that it may not mean anything at all. It's hard, so he calls it ridiculous, so why do you call it anything else?

"Feelings - brain process recognition theory". To improve my mind is to think that feelings are just brain processes. In the sense of strict identity, emotions and brain processes are two names of things. Similarly, when talking about "Morning Star" or "Late Star" people talk about Venus. There is only one physical element in this world, and we get another statement from it, for example "morning star is the last star you can see in the morning." "Morning star" happens to be Venus. Philosophers seem to tend to think that identity statements are necessary and must be a priori truth. However, identity theorists consider "emotions as processes of the brain" by chance. We must find that identity exists. After all, Aristotle believes that the brain is used to cool the blood. Descartes thinks consciousness is irrelevant. Sometimes, people object to saying that the statement of emotion can not be ignored and that the statement about the brain is provable. I deduce that emotions must have something different. Ryle, indeed, Wittgenstein says that the direct experience of reporting is not a real report, but an attractive and unbelievable idea that it is "open" as if my toothache report is a kind of report Syringe Emotion and perception are two very closely related independent processes. Sensation is about the input of the physical world obtained through our sensory receptors, the process of which the brain selects, organizes and interprets these emotions. In other words, the sensation is the physiological basis of perception. Because each brain interprets stimuli differently according to individual learning, memory, mood, and expectation, recognition of senses of the same sense may vary from person to person. Most psychologists believe that feelings are an important part of bottom-up processing. This means that emotion occurs when the sensory organ transfers information to the brain. On the other hand, perception is part of top-down processing. In this case perception occurs when the brain interprets the sensory information and sends a corresponding signal to the sensory organ in response to the physical stimulus. Emotion is the process by which our brain acquires information through our senses, which can then be experienced and interpreted by the brain. For our five sensory systems, feelings arise: visual, hearing, taste, smell, and tactile. Each of these systems maintains a unique neural pathway with the brain that allows them to transfer information very rapidly from the environment to the brain. Without feeling, I can not enjoy the sunny spring day in the park. Each sensory system includes its own sensory receptors designed to detect specific environmental stimuli. Once sensed, sensory receptors convert environmental stimulation energy into electrochemical nerve impulses. Then the brain interprets the neural information and makes the brain experience and decision about the environment. Let's carefully examine the sensory process by examining each of the five sensory systems involved.

Discussion about artificial intelligence can be thought of. Or, to be more precise, we can develop true artificial intelligence in the meaning of human's thought and understanding machine. As computers become more complex, our lives become indispensable. This is an interesting question that is becoming increasingly important in our lives. Two articles "John Searle's" Thoughts, Brains, Procedures "and William Lycan's" Robots and Minds "present two different answers and pose several new questions. The history of the fight against these problems dates back to Plato and Aristotle, has many years of difference between Descartes and Kant, reflected in contemporary discussions on artificial intelligence and genetic research. Many problems focus not on the problem itself, but on how to answer them. "From the German experience in the mid-nineteenth century, the psychologist himself and other famous social philosophers of the 19th century believed that human thought had to be approached in two fundamentally different ways: science If the empirical method of research is clever, the memory of things that can normally pass through These can be measured and experimentally manipulated. The focus of this year is clear: artificial intelligence. Rather than forgetting to persuade a controversy, Steven Hawking's contribution ('artificial intelligence may be the best or worst thing for human beings') to discuss technology ethics - with regard to this topic too There are also many discussions. There is even a destructive speech by Sophia's robot and Max Tegmark on Life 0. As a female technology producer and organizer of Google's developer group, I organized many activities in both technical and non-technical for my community. But I always think about this question. How can we promote the diversity of science and technology activities better and make all participants' activities more practical? Is there any discussion about artificial intelligence? On the contrary, can we develop true artificial intelligence in the meaning of machines of human thought and understanding? As computers become more complex, our lives become indispensable. This is an interesting question that is becoming increasingly important in our lives. Two articles "John Searle's" Thoughts, Brains, Procedures "and William Lycan's" Robots and Minds "present two different answers to this question. What? Is A.I. possible? In SF movie 'Terminator directed by James Cameron', the computer in the movie is "smart", confronting the human master. In other words, the computer in the movie is independent of the programmer and can develop artificial intelligence (A.I.). This article proves that in the real world, computers do not achieve artificial intelligence, even even functionalism.

Most people are not confused about their existence because they have neither witnessed nor experienced God. In Western theology there are three theories to prove the existence of God. These theories are ontological arguments, cosmological arguments, and objective arguments. St. Anselm in the 11th century and Descartes in the 17th century used ontology arguments to prove the existence of God. For them, God is supreme, "He does not need anything but needs all being and happiness" (PG. Exploration of ontological arguments For about 1000 years, ontological arguments have attracted the attention of philosophers. The order of ontology arguments from thinking to reality is revolutionary. This is an argument that does not actually require a corresponding experiment and does not require empirical data for operation. - Early elements of cosmological argument were developed by world famous philosophers Plato and Aristotle between 400 and 200 BC. The medieval philosopher St. Thomas Aquinas extended their thoughts when writing "five ways" in the latter half of the 13 th century. Since that time, cosmological arguments have become one of the most widely accepted and critical arguments against the existence of God. Immanuel Kant gives the traditional definition of ontological debate. He contrasts ontological arguments (indeed any discussion related to existence) to cosmological and physiological theoretical arguments. According to Kant, the ontological debate is an argument based on a priori reasoning. Graham Oppy defines the ontology as "the sole prerequisite of analysis, a priori and necessity" and "existence of God" that Graham Oppy thinks "there is no urgent reason to deviate from the traditional definition" It draws the view that it draws out the conclusions of. However, Oppy acknowledges that not all "ontological features" (analytical, necessity, priority) of ontology arguments are present in all ontology arguments. The definition of an ontological argument that "proposed a better point" would only take into account the consideration "within the scope of a perfect theological view of the theory". An argument about the existence argument argument argument of God is an a priori argument. These arguments try to prove the existence of God from the meaning of the word God. Anselm of Canterbury introduced an ontological argument to his work 'Proslogion'. The classic argument of Anselm is based on two principles, the most important of which are St. Anselm and Rene de Carte of the above Canterbury. - Cosmological argument tries to prove the existence of God by showing that there are no myriad reasons for the existence of objects. It states that everything must have the last unresolved cause. The reason for this unknown reason is declared to be God. Such discussion is believed to be the reason for understanding us and the existence of the universe. There are several forms of cosmological argument, but basically it is as follows.

Transcendental philosophers need special enlightenment to enter the classics of transcendental philosophy (Kant's "criticism", Descartes' metaphysics "and Fichte's" scientific doctrine "). Three kinds of transcendental thinking are fused, rational autonomy is regarded as the ultimate foundation of defense. Therefore, the philosophical education of all three philosophers focuses on how to grasp and make available highly intelligent (or active self decision) of intelligence and survival. The modern transcendental philosophy was developed by a German philosopher Harald Holtz in a holistic approach. Holz freed the transcendence from the fusion of the new cantanism and critically discussed the transcendental pragmatism and the transcendental philosophy, the relationship between the new empiricism and the so-called postmodern. In everyday languages, "transcend" means "transcendence", "self transcendism" means transcending the form or state before you. This mysterious experience is considered to be a state of transcendental self transcendence, in particular, self recognition is abandoned there. "Self transcending" is psychologically measurable, is considered (at least in part) genetic, and has been included in the temperament and personality list as a personality dimension. Dean Haymer explained this finding with the book "Genes of God", but this was criticized by critics like Carl Jimmer. Transcendence is born from "romanticism in England and Germany, John Gottfried Herder and Friedrich Schliermach's biblical criticism, David Hume's skepticism", Emmanuel Kant and German idealism. Philosophy of transcendental theory. Miller and Versluis believe that Emanuel Swedenborg has a universal influence on transcendentalism. It is also strongly influenced by spiritual and spiritual philosophy, in particular Hindu texts on Upanishad. Transcendentalism is closely related to monotheism, the main religious movement in Boston in the early 19th century. After Henry Weir was elected Professor of Hollis theology in 1805 and John Thornton Kirkland was elected President in 1810, after acquiring monotheism at Harvard University, it began to develop. Transcendentalism is not a rejection of monotheism but rather an organic result of a monotheist emphasizing the value of free conscience and intellectual rationality. Transcendentalism is based on the transcendental philosophy of German idealism, seen as a substitute for the rock style "spiritism" of God's church by New England intellectuals in the early 19th century. They want to establish their religion and philosophy through transcendental principles. Thus, they can not achieve through perceptual experience, whether they are not based on sensory experience, but rather using the principles that are achieved from the human inner, spiritual or spiritual nature It means. Immanuel Kant said, "All knowledge transcendence is not about things, but about the knowledge patterns of ours." Since the transcendentalists were basically inspired by the German philosophy of the original text, they relied primarily on the works of Thomas Carlyle, Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Victor cousin, and Germaine Starr. In stark contrast to the philosophy that the transcendentalists do not know, they are very familiar with the English romanticism.

The history of Western civilization can not be divided finely into strictly linear parts. Instead, they need to be viewed as a series of evolving threads that combine, interact, and make a universal transition at different time intervals. Enlightenment in the 18th century was one of the historical transformations of these paradigms, challenging traditional authority by investing in rationality and the power to change human condition. This general emphasis on rationality and independent thinking has brought about explosive growth in the transformation and development of science, philosophy, religion, and politics. Okay, men and girls, ready to enlightenment In this lesson I will introduce enlightenment. what is that? Enlightenment, sometimes called the era of enlightenment, was an intellectual movement from the late 17th century to the early 18th century, emphasizing reasons, individualism, and skepticism. Enlightenment challenged the traditional religious view. Because that was such a wide movement, enlightenment did not have an accurate start date. It did not pop up, but it gradually developed. Most historians came to the beginning of enlightenment from the mid 17th century to the beginning of the 18th century. The work of intellectuals like Rene Descartes, Barus Spinoza, Isaac Newton is particularly important for the creation of enlightenment. It is impossible to talk about enlightenment unless you talk about the political leap of this age. The historian follows the scientific beginning of enlightenment to Principal Mathematica written by Sir Isaac Newton in 1686. This work is considered to be the majority of the philosophy driving science, mathematics, and enlightenment, in combination with John Rock's "Papers on Human Understanding" (1689). It is said that enlightenment really began with the 1776 American Revolution. The idea of ​​rethinking the minds of people through writers such as Thomas Payne, John Rock, Thomas Jefferson, has finally tried the Republic for the first time since the Roman period. Like other era of enlightenment, founder of the United States returned to the classical era and planned as to how they would like to manage their new country. An important person in the establishment of America like Thomas Jefferson was greatly influenced by enlightenment. That means that this country is also true. Jefferson has both classical education and humanities science training, practicality and experience, so it is a perfect person of enlightenment. As the author of the Declaration of Independence, Jefferson formed the country by integrating the concept of natural rights in government and religion. In addition, he understands the importance of education in making these ideals work in a new country and establishing the University of Virginia. In many respects, Jefferson represents a way the Enlightenment ideals can be carried out in new colonies. The same can be said of other men like Benjamin Franklin. Because they have so many systems and pamphlets on which the state is based, and enlightenment still exists.

The mind and body begin from the era of Plato and Aristotle, there is a dualism and symbiosis of thought and body. Dualism is always the driving force behind the existence of thought / physical problems, and so far primarily due to the influence of Descartes. In modern times, modern medicine has transformed into symbiosis. External stimulation perceived by the heart may have beneficial or harmful effects on the body. The body as an organism has healing ability, but the evidence proves that the mind can accelerate recovery. For the mind: As the body detoxifies, rejuvenates and regenerates, the mind starts to function more efficiently. On an empty stomach, the digestive system rests and releases energy for others. This energy is used by the spirit and brings spiritual clarity. Fasting enhances the will of the mind and strengthens the control of sensation and mind. Most people can benefit from fasting. Even those who are sending a relatively healthy lifestyle have toxins. Due to aging and often poor nutritional habits, environmental pollutants, stress and stressful conditions, most of us are suffering from systemic toxicity deposits. An important and sometimes incredible change occurred in removing these toxins, and it took place My heart is a subtle form of this meat. The body is an external manifestation of the soul. Therefore, when the heart is rough, the body is rough. To be rude in appearance can not generally cite the love and compassion of others, so a ruthless person can not call anyone's love and compassion. The mind clearly reflects various conditions that intellectuals can read easily. As the tongue is an indicator of the stomach, the face is an indicator of the mind. Your thoughts, emotions, patterns, and emotions will give you a strong impression on your face. A face is like a signboard advertising what is going on in the heart. On the surface, you can hardly hide your thoughts. You might be ridiculous enough to think that you kept secretly your thoughts. Ideas such as desire, greed, jealousy, anger, revenge, hatred will immediately impress you on your face.

In the academic field, we will clarify the nature and meaning of ordinary scientific beliefs and discuss the premise, meaning, mutual relations, in particular the nature and structure of reality (metaphysics), the source of knowledge, and the source of knowledge through rational discussion To understand the possibility of understanding. A rational study of the limit (epistemology), the principle and importance (morality) of moral judgment, and the relation between language and reality (semantics) Specific doctrine of these issues related to specific individuals and schools related to Descartes philosophy C.1300 from "French old philosophy" philosophy, knowledge "(12c, contemporary French philosophy), directly from Latin philosophy and Greek philosophy," knowledge, knowledge system "," knowledge, knowledge system "," pursuit of love knowledge, wisdom, systematic Survey "" Love "(see philo-) + sophia" knowledge, wisdom "," wisdom from refinement, knowledge abundant ", the origin is unknown Nec quicquam aliud est philosophy, si interpretarian veis, praeter studium sapientiae, sapientia aust est rerum divinarum et human arum causarumquibus eae res continentur scientia. [Cicero, "De Officiis"] [Philosophical problems] is certainly not an empirical problem, but it is solved by gaining insight about the function of our language, and thus these operations are recognized. The problem is solved not by the contribution of new knowledge but by the arrangement of familiar ones in the long term. Philosophy is the purpose of our language against the confusion of our understanding (Verhexung). [Ludwig Wittgenstein, "Philosophy Research", 1953] Study of the basic principles of the world trying to discover science, art, science and art; philosophy comes from Greek "love of wisdom". There are many branches of philosophy exploring principles of specific fields such as knowledge (epistemology), reasoning (logic), general (metaphysics), beauty (aesthetics), and human behavior (ethics). Different philosophical methods are also called philosophy. (See gastronomy, existentialism, idealism, materialism, nihilism, pragmatism, stoicism, utilitarianism.) New Culture Literacy Dictionary, 3rd Edition Copyright © 2005 Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company. Houghton Published by Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company. Copyright There are many philosophical studies. Philosophy asks for all knowledge of the whole knowledge, that is subject to disciplinary action, so in reality there is an infinite philosophy. Traditionally, most philosophical students study (a) the history of philosophy and (b) the systematic areas of philosophy. Since the presentation of philosophical problems and suggested solutions has developed over the centuries, these two approaches complement each other and the history of philosophy often tells how to understand the problem and propose solutions Define. The apex of ancient philosophy is the classical Greek philosophy developed by Plato and Aristotle. The two philosophers defined philosophical questions, philosophical vocabulary, methodology, and genre as fields and influenced the philosophical tradition as a whole. Their philosophy is far more comprehensive than the philosophy of other ancient philosophers. The philosophy of yin and yang may be the oldest philosophy in Chinese classical philosophy. It is a comprehensive metaphysics based on the principles of yin and yang including natural phenomena and personnel affairs. For centuries it has been applied in various fields and fields including medicine, nutrition, art, martial arts and so on. Philosophy is one of the most important aspects of any traditional martial arts. The philosophy of many martial arts like Taekwondo, Kung Fu, Karatedo is based on Confucianism and principles of Confucius Revelation. Mencius lived in the Sengoku period and saw the words and confusion of Confucius' battle. When rulers compete for power, Mensius will try to find the rea

The age of enlightenment was an age of scientific awakening; the era of enlightenment mainly developed in France. The starting point for Enlightenment is John Locke's book on human understanding. Enlightenment attacked church leaders and focused on problems that were avoided in the past. Trying to challenge the church requires courage. Illuminati asked people "Earth is the center of the universe." There are four major areas of change, religion, intellectuals, economics, politics. From the Middle Ages to the Enlightenment and the Enlightenment of the 19th century and the 19th century, the evolution of knowledge has changed dramatically. From the 17th century to the 18th century to the 19th century, the era of enlightenment was regarded as a cultural movement of intellectuals. It is said that it began to spread to American colonies of Continental Europe. This is by purpose https://www.studymode.com/subjects/which-labels-for-the-middle-ages-best-describe-the-era-between-500-and-1400-in-europe-the-dark-ages- Feudal age of Europe's most faithful, or most golden age ages - page 1. Html Labels and research papers label "What is the best medieval beliefs describing the era of the feudalism of the golden era of the European 500 to 1400 or the European dark era era" Well, men and women, preparation for enlightenment. In this lesson we will introduce Enlightenment. what is that? Enlightenment is sometimes called "era of enlightenment", emphasizing rationality, individualism and skepticism, the 17th century intellectual movement and the late 18th century. Enlightenment challenged the traditional religious view. The Enlightenment was such a broad movement, so there was no exact start date. I did not pop up, but it gradually developed. Most historians set the beginning of the Enlightenment from the middle of the 17th century to the beginning of the 18th century. The work of intellectuals such as Rene Descartes, Barus Spinoza, Isaac Newton is particularly important for the creation of the Enlightenment. Jean-Baptiste Poquelin Moliere wrote Tartuffe at the beginning of Enlightenment's era. A major characteristic of the awareness era was promotion of rationality over emotions for decision making. The Enlightenment leaders truly believe that the world will be better if people do this. In Tartov, when a character makes decisions using his emotions, they feel that they are in a bad state. And those feelings dominate them

If I want to say to other people, do I want to go home safely? I searched on Google and found that this sentence has a different meaning. This is a long time ago. Therefore, I do not know whether to use it properly in the sentence. Does my sentence sound ambiguous? If so, how can I rewrite it? I returned to school. Please come back correctly. Three days, I completed a novel and completed another novel. I'm fine. Without the written text pressure and the new writer's new essay in front of me, I think that I will be stronger than before. And read various styles and genres. Do not live, and do not say, "Oh, I will never read fear, it will not attract my interest" - it is bullish. I was the first person who admitted that horror movies did not help me; but I knew that there was a great writer so I pushed myself into the world. When I returned to college, I truncated any questions that started with the phrase "You do not think" and had a professor who explained that there is no real problem with this phrase. Instead he said lazy students - we all use this structure to hide prejudice - really, really. More importantly, these concepts usually have good knowledge and we are a waste of time as we are teenagers. I followed a professor who is not very alert in the classroom to follow the number and value of the question "You are not thinking". They occur frequently and are of poor quality. Repeat offenders are government classes, guerrillas view their views as "you do not think". However, the problem of "You do not think" is dangerous everywhere because it is driven by prejudice. Prejudice is also a good way to invest in stocks with loss, as prejudice is your idea before examining the evidence. It dates back to Plato, many years have passed. If you've heard of this, "I think I like this", you have already touched on epistemism (This sentence comes from Descartes, after he decided to doubt everything Even if you are suspected, you will realize this is the truth, but I am mourning, which means that it is very difficult to define the truth, then someone will call it "fake news "We started cognitive discussions nationwide, perhaps like the whole world.

From a historical perspective, the philosophy of optimism dates back to the 17th century. The philosophy of optimism constitutes the idea of ​​an ideal society, optimism as a philosophy is defined as the world where human beings live is "the best world of all possible worlds". The philosophy of the origin of optimism is accompanied by illness, disaster, and suffering. Philosophers suggest that despite the existence of these events, thoughts, or emerging qualities, everything in the world is the best or the best. The pioneers of optimistic philosophy are Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz and Alexander Pope. Optimistic philosophy is still common today in media, psychology, and virtuality. GOTTFRIED WILHELM Leibniz is quoted most frequently as a German mathematician and philosopher, but he has also been successful in other fields. As a versatile scholar and a noble philosopher, Leibniz was recognized as a philosophical principle to develop optimism. Leibnitz outlined his theory and believed that God, who circumvented all theology and philosophy, was kind and believed to balance the world with social conditions to optimize good and evil. Leibniz claims that world evil is the result of sins at the material or metaphysical level and is the result of free will. Leibniz's philosophy is best known for Voltaire's Candide Because of his belief, when the church founded in the UK suppressed Catholic, he lived in England. The Pope became a successful poet, writer and essayist mainly for his satirical poetry and use of heroes. One of the most famous works of the Pope, "Human Paper" is a poem that brings out the principles of faith and philosophical optimism. The Pope supports pessimism and devout faith in God, sort of, optimism about the god of omniscience. Voltaire studied the optimistic philosophy from the Pope, and he used it to inspire the famous text Candide. Today, philosophical optimism does not require divinity, but it also applies to today's news. For example, true optimists will see a situation quite different from those who do not follow the principles of optimistic philosophy. When Yates killed her five children in 2001, the country was full of anger, disgust and curiosity about seemingly skilled mothers. Yeats often insists that she saw that they killed children and "saved" them from God and they were avoiding hell. Optimists may think the situation is the best, because they may think that God or some other mental force other than God was trying to kill them for unfair reasons is. Optimists do not question the reason, but accept the situation of balancing the universe for the best future. The philosophy of optimism is not just advocated by Leibniz. His shape is different from Leibniz himself, but he has a disciple, Christian Wolf, but he does the same. Voltaire's mistress, Mrs. Châtelet is also keen on philosophy. Most importantly, Leibniz and the British poet Alexander Pope served him, and expressed a very similar view in his "Human Dissertation" (1733-34): Voltaire said it right after the earthquake I wrote. His "Poèmeurledésastrede Lisbonne" (Lisbon disaster poetry) published in 1756 expresses his philosophical change about the nature of good and evil of the world. Translator Roger Pearson says, "The first question about this poem is how the genocide can comply with the eternal law of good and free God, It is to be punished. " Sen, Candide, p.xix) Voltaire could not find the answer to his question, so he put together his poem in a skeptical manner with a hopeful smile. In philosophy, Leibniz is known for his optimism, that is, his conclusion is that in our limits our universe is the best universe that God would have created. Thai satire. Leibniz, along with René Descartes and Baruch Spinoza, is one of three rationalist supporters of the 17th century. Leibniz's work looks forward to modern logic and analysis philosophy, but his philosophy recalls the academic tradition in which conclusions are drawn by applying reasons

Below is a brief list of medieval philosophers I know, so it certainly is not exhaustive: St. Augustine (4th - 5th century) was a medieval border, but it was important to understand most of the medieval philosophy (because theology dominated this era). Augustine's confession is the work of metaphysics and Christian theology, which has a very great influence on philosophy (and not so much). Augustine himself is the leader of the entire monastic movement and today it has a strong religious influence. St. Anselm is another excellent Christian philosopher, although he is much later than Augustine (the 11th century). Anselm may be the best of its kind for an ontological argument of God (later quoted by the philosopher Descartes and Kant) This is a very influential argument that has received broad support and opposition is. Maimonides was probably the most influential Jewish philosopher and lived in the 12th century. His work includes an important explanation of the 613 Jewish commandments and an analysis of the concepts brought by monotheism. He also concentrated his creation on his philosophy and developed a theory with classical influence. His philosophy has a great influence on theology and metaphysics. Ibn Sinar (also known as Avicenna) was one of the most prominent Muslim philosophers of the Middle Ages and lived in the 12th century. It is difficult to point out a specific Islamic thinker who dominated this era, but Ibn Sina may be one of the more influential factors. Like other medieval philosophers, his extensive research often covers metaphysics, but from the Islamic point of view. Many of his philosophical pursuits have focused on a reconciliation between a reasonable philosophy and religion (a highly relevant question which was soon revealed during the Renaissance). His other influences include law and medicine. From the Carolinga era to the end of the Middle Ages it was one of the most popular and influential philosophical works read by politicians, poets, historians, philosophers and theologians. Through Poitius, much of the idea of ​​classical times was used by the medieval world of the West. People often say that Boethius is "the last Roman and the first scholar." The philosophical message of this book is very suitable for medieval religious beliefs. Instead of looking for secular goods such as money and power, encourage readers to seek virtue of internalization. Evil suffering is thought to be moral, but the evil aims to provide lessons to help change. As God dominates the universe through love, the application of prayers and love to God will bring true happiness. Guido of Arezzo is a medieval priest who may be regarded as one of the most influential people in the history of contemporary music. In the Middle Ages, the monastery was one of the most important institutions in Europe. Worshiping God is essential to the life of the medieval monks. One way of worship is to sing holy music. One of the problems the Guzz of Arezzo was trying to fix for these Carols was due to this contribution, he had a very big impact on the later music. The cathedral school began in the early medieval period of higher education, some of which ultimately evolved into a medieval university. In the middle of the Middle Ages, the Chartres cathedral operated the famous and influential Chartres Cathedral School. The medieval colleges of the West Christian world are successfully integrated in Western Europe and nurture various excellent scholars and natural philosophers, including Robert Grosseteste of Oxford University, an early interpreter of systematic scientific methods To do. . Experiment; and St. Albert, a pioneer of biological research at the University of Bologna in Italy, is considered the oldest university

My research theme is the scroll of the Dead Sea, determinism and free will, or coexistence of moral evil with nature's evil and dualism text. I am very interested in this issue as I am very interested in discussions between scholars and scientists. When applied to religious background, it seems to be a particularly complicated problem, which can not be resolved rationally or scientifically. When deciding to know what surprised the ancients, this topic was close to the center of my personal interest. Dualism: Understanding of reality exists at two extremes. Metaphysical dualism thinks that the universe exists in two opposite (and sometimes inconsistent) reality - heart and material, or spirit and substance, or yin and yang. Moral dualism assumes a conflict between universal benefits and universal evil and hostile evils (eg believing that God and Satan are equal and opposed). Eadie, Betty: A writer of a new-era of bestsellers, accepted by the light and the heart of awakening. As an active member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Edie claims that he died, went to heaven, and returned to her body (see experience of near death). Her book contains a combination of a new era and Mormonistic faith. Dualism is always a characteristic of many religions and philosophies. Recognizing that the universe has both spiritual and physical aspects, dualism usually regards the spiritual world as good and the material world as evil. But since the Hebrew Scriptures did material creation very well (Genesis 1: 31) and believed that there was evil spirit (1st Sam 16: 14), those who supported dualism gave the Old Testament I could not refuse. However, since the work of the New Testament is based on the same principle, only distortion can be used to support dualism. Dualism is defined as a two-part state. It usually refers to people who have two views on nature: material (physical) and spiritual (soul). Dualism thinks the problem is evil, only spirit or soul is good. I will look at how the different parts of the Bible show the separation of the soul and the body. It exists in many ways, including sexual, political and social aspects. The most common message is that the soul is the most important part of man. It is also clear that both Christians and the author of the Bible believe that the soul is an independent spirit and is only contained within the body. To be philosophical dualism means that there are two different entities or substances in the universe - material, mental, physical, and spiritual. The great difference between the ancient Greeks and the soul is in adage. "The body is a grave." Therefore evil is a result confined to a limited body by an infinite soul. For example, Plato is a strong dualism because it expresses the idea that the soul is independent of the physical existence. A reasonable soul, like a tank or a tank, is a spiritual substance different from the body in which it lives. Dualism played a major role in the European Renaissance when Descartes fully described this idea as substance entity and material expanding substance. This dualism makes it possible to realize all the mathematical science of physics and all the facts of the material world are explained based on measurements.

Today we can tell that Patricia Smith Churchland 's mental state can not be reduced to a neurobiological state. According to Norton's philosophy, "[Churchland] is known for linking neuroscience with traditional philosophical themes (consciousness, self, free will, morality, etc.)" (T.N.I.P, 424) 1. Qualia - also known as "experience, emotion, [and] qualitative features of [and] feelings ..." (Churchland, 1) 2. Introspection - "Observe or confirm your spiritual and emotional state" (Dictionary.com) Churchland began her article by explaining the belief that Thomas Nagel had a point of view. Show more She is difficult to believe that the second premise is that the state of the brain can not be discerned by introspection. This brings the main argument that "the psychological state is the same as the state of the brain". Churchland breaks it down. If the state of mind is exactly the same as the state of the brain, you will observe the same state of the brain when you observe the state of the mind. Church Land said: "I am not to describe my mental state as a state of the brain but to rely on information about my brain, not whether my mental state is exactly the same as the state of some brain Whether or not this world is irrelevant to my knowledge, this is a fact about the world "(Churchland, 2). She raised the following example. Jones swallowed aspirin, so he swallowed acetylsalicylic acid. Finally, I will discuss Churchill 's explanation about Frank Jackson' s claim: Please understand our emotions. Churchland interprets Jacksons' opinion as "the difference between introspection and nonintrusions to understand our condition has the property of denying the reducibility of psychology to the neuroscience" Yes (Churchland, 4). . I will summarize the summary of Churchy on the construction theory of Jacksony. Neuroscientist who has never seen color in her life (Mary) The concept of exclusion of materialism supported by Churchland (Churchland 1988) states that psychiatric disorders are not present in mental state barriers and such barriers do not exist, but potential neurobiological processes (in artificial intelligence ). In these cases, these are neural electronic processes. This theory contradicts the assertion of absolute reliability proposed by Descartes and supported by Searle. Therefore, the state of mind is correct and disorderly. The fact that no faultless theory is expressed in the folk psychology model of the world is counterfeit, denying allegations that exclusion of materialism is error free, so error free arguments are forgeable. Discussion on the abolition of materialism includes arguments on self-refutation. There, the actual thinking of the concept of exclusionism itself may be a nonexistent belief "mental state". Today we can tell that Patricia Smith Churchland 's mental state can not be reduced to a neurobiological state. According to Norton's philosophy primer, "It is known for his research in combining neuroscience with traditional philosophical themes (consciousness, self, free will, morality, etc.)" (T.N.I.P, 424). Churchland breaks it down. If the state of mind is exactly the same as the state of the brain, you will observe the same state of the brain when you observe the state of the mind. Church Land said: "I am not to describe my mental state as a state of the brain but rather whether I rely on brain information or not and whether the mental state is exactly the same as some brain states .

In this article, I will study Spinoza's mind and body theory, first explain various interpretations of his mind and body theory, such as homosexuality, idealism, classicism, materialism and so on. From critical comments on these inappropriate explanations, Spinoza 's argument about mind - body relationships should be understood as a non - causal relationship between the mind and the body, and they have the same weight I will. Parallel interpretation is compatible with the above understanding, but traditional parallelization can not be attributed to Spinoza. His parallelism arises from his argument about identity between the mind and the body, and this assertion is based on his material monism and attribute binaryism. Therefore, we must understand Spinoza's mind and body theory as an identity theory. It leads to a parallel relationship between the mind and the body. Since the dual aspect theory coincides with the identity and parallelism between thinking and the body, Spinoza's theory should be attributed to a double aspect theory. Furthermore, as Spinoza maintains material monism and attribute dualism (assuming that thought and extended attributes are objectively seen, this is different), Spinoza's theory includes psychological events and physics There is identity between events. There is no identity between spiritual and physical attributes. Psychological and physical events are the same events described under psychological and physical attributes, respectively. From the discovery of identity in Spinoza 's individuals or events it is possible to think that his theory should also be understood as a symbolic identity theory, rather than discovering the identity of the attribute. Spinoza's mind theory is totally representative mind theory. For Spinoza psychology is only representative content. In Ethics 2p7, he argues that "the order and connection of thinking is consistent with the order and connection of things", that is, parallel ideas exist for each extended objective. This is called parallel processing. From this point of view, Spinoza can develop his theory of mind: "The first thing that makes up the actual existence of human thought is only the concept of a single existing thing" (2 p 11) . Each heart is an idea that has its own object in itself - in the case of a human being, the mind is the thought of the body and everything that happens in the body is expressed in the mind (he discussed in 2 p 12 and 2 p 13 like) . The mind is a special idea representing a single object, the body in which it is parallel. (Please refer to Della Rocca 1996 for details on Spinoza's representative mind theory.) In this article, I will study Spinoza's mind and body theory, first explain various interpretations of his mind and body theory, such as homosexuality, idealism, classicism, materialism and so on. From critical comments on these inappropriate explanations, Spinoza 's argument about mind - body relationships should be understood as a non - causal relationship between the mind and the body, and they have the same weight I will. Parallel interpretation is compatible with the above understanding, but traditional parallelization can not be attributed to Spinoza. His parallelism arises from his argument about identity between the mind and the body, and this assertion is based on his material monism and attribute binaryism. Therefore, we should understand Spinoza's mind and body theory as identity theory. It leads to a parallel relationship between the mind and the body. For Spinoza, the human body has extended attributes, human thought has attributes of thought and expression. Also, the mind and body may express the possibilities of reality in parallel, or the mind and body may be the same substance (substance) considered under different attributes. In the language Spinoza inherited from Descartes, the idea is an expression of ideas. This led to Spinoza's famous conclusion that the human heart is equivalent to the human mind. The

Harm from the Universe In our vast universe there are several dangerous situations that directly affect the lives we know on the earth. These hazards include meteors, asteroids, emission of charged solar particles, supernovae, and human problems. The possibility of directly harming these dangers of the Earth's population is very low, but if it is not completely impossible, something about the Apocalypse seems to evoke human thought. The possibility that a meteorite or a large asteroid collides with the Earth is a legitimate threat to our planet. Planet Earth is a miracle of our universe, enabling the growth of diverse natural creatures and beautiful scenery. However, this great beauty brings about natural disasters, which can be detrimental to the continuation of living creatures on the surface and the sea. These disasters rarely warned, and completely disintegrated the function of society. - People's progress within the United States and the United States has had a meaningful impact on the country, whether it is willful or not. Advances such as such large movements and second major movements are an example of the movement that has a major impact on the United States. In these campaigns, African-American immigrants escaped racial discrimination and prejudice in the south and asked for employment in industrial cities. Harm from the Universe In our vast universe there are several dangerous situations that directly affect the lives we know on the earth. These hazards include meteors, asteroids, emission of charged solar particles, supernovae, and human problems. The possibility of directly harming these dangers of the Earth's population is very low, but if it is not completely impossible, something about the Apocalypse seems to evoke human thought. - Funding for space exploration should be higher than now. It brings scientific, technical and economic benefits to all human beings. In addition, as long as we continue to explore, it will continue to provide these benefits. The US space program and the US economy are currently facing many challenges, but we need to consider long-term costs by not implementing a powerful manned unmanned space plan. Space is a challenging environment for human exploration due to the dual risk of vacuum and radiation. Microgravity also adversely affects human physiology, causing muscle atrophy and bone loss. In addition to these health and environmental problems, the economic cost of placing objects including humans in space is very high. In 350 BC, Greek philosopher Aristotle believed that nature disliked the vacuum cleaner, which is the principle known as a terrorist vacuum cleaner. This concept is based on the ontological argument of the Greek philosopher Parmenides of the 5th century BC and he denied that there might be a hole in the universe. According to this view, it is generally considered that a vacuum can not exist and in the west space the space can not be empty. Until the 17 th century, French philosopher René Descartes thought that it was necessary to fill the whole space.

Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, who had lived at the age of 82, created more than 130 poems, plays, letters and science, and was recognized as one of the world's leading literary giants. His works include completely unique and different things such as fairy tales, psychological novels, political and historical novels, and even Faust. Goethe was born in the middle class family on August 28, 1749 shortly after the death of the Pope. Because she is the daughter of the mayor, his mother has many relationships. Abstract: In this article we will explore "subtle empiricism" proposed by Johann Wolfgang von Goethe. Goethe's scientific research provides another epistemology for traditional science. The author discusses the way that Goethe knows. Particular emphasis is placed on the process, form and participation of the epistemology expressed by Goethe. I introduced Goethe's scientific methodology and explored its application and its significance. Goethe's "Zalte Empirie" - his subtle empiricism - legalizes and organizes the role of imagination, intuition, and inspiration in science. It may make a significant contribution to the emerging participatory and holistic worldview and provide knowledge that is compatible with nature. In this article we will explore its methods and reasons. The first attempt to provide an alternative or complementary epistemological perspective to Descartes-Kant epistemology was proposed by poets, scientists and politicians John Wolfgang von Goethe. In the last article I introduced the familiarity with the texts of Goethe's seal and alchemy and the potential interests of his understanding of nature over the life of alchemy and interest in his work. The scientific method provides the first clear thing, as pointed out by Richard Tanas, whose epistemological views were later presented by Schiller, Schering, Hegel, Coleric, Emerson and others. .... Rudolph Steiner has developed in a new direction. Each of these thinkers have paid their own attention to the prospects of development, but they all share the same basic belief that human thought and the relationship of the world are eventually participatory rather than alternative is. "48 Writers, scholars, visual artists, amateur scientists, politicians, John Wolfgang von Goethe are talented people. "Young Witte" is not his most famous work - this distinction belongs to the drama "Faust" - a two part tragedy - but this work is a pioneer as his literary celebrity. After a terrible division, Goethe wrote his first novel with six weeks of writing. A few years ago, Goethe met a woman named Charlotte Buff and fell in love. She refused his progress, but married an art collector and a diplomat. In 1722, Goethe's philosopher and acquaintance Karl Jerusalem shot himself with a pistol borrowed from a female fiance who did not love him. Goethe combined these two different events to form the foundation of the "Young Walter" story.

Society reduces diversity to various categories, but human phenotype has infinite diversity. Anthropologists believe that the appearance that is considered important for human appearance, especially physical attraction, may have a significant impact on the development of personality and social relations. Humans are very sensitive to their appearance. [1] Differences in human appearance are genetic, some are due to age, lifestyle and illness, others are due to personal decoration. Some people associate some differences with ethnic relationships such as bone shape, forward or elongated steps. Different cultures highlight the appearance and importance of social status and other phenomena to varying degrees. In addition to Antarctica, humans are distributed throughout the world to form diverse species. In adults, the average weight ranges from about 40 kg for the smallest and lightest tropical population to about 80 kg for the northern heavier population. [2] Size also depends on gender Human gender difference is more prominent than chimpanzee, but it is lower than gorilla. [3] Skin, hair, eye color are also very different, pigmentation is deep in tropical climate, and color becomes darker in polar regions. Height, weight, skin color, body hair, genitals, moles, freckles, hair color, hair quality, eye color, eye shape (see nasal passages), nose shape (See earlobe) Blush, cry, fainting, snoring, yawning, laughing, stuttering, sexual arousal, sweating, trembling, nose bleeding, changes in skin color due to sunlight and frost Depending on clothing such as hats and footwear, clothes there are things that change the shape of the body and shape it (corset, support pantyhose, bra, etc.). For footwear, high heels show people higher Hairstyle style and color (see Mohawks, hairpins, scorpions, ponytails, wigs, hairpins, facial hair, beard and mustache) Medical or body conversion tool (eg dental appliances, bandages, models, hearing aids, collars, crutches, contact lenses of different colors, glasses, gold teeth). For example, the appearance of the same person may be completely different, depending on whether they use one of the above changes. Dress code is a set of more general written rules written about clothes. Clothes have social significance as well as other aspects of the human body appearance and apply various rules and expectations according to the environment and circumstances. Within a day an individual may need to go between two or more clothing requirements. For example, many people come and go between household clothing code and working clothing code; usually this ability is a result of cultural adaptation. Western style is widely thought to be effective, but if society and culture are different, dress code will be different Society reduces diversity to various categories, but human phenotype has infinite diversity. Anthropologists believe that the appearance that is considered important for human appearance, especially physical attraction, may have a significant impact on the development of personality and social relations. Humans are very sensitive to their appearance. Some of the differences in human appearance are genetic, others are the result of age, lifestyle and illness, and many are the result of personal decorations. This movie clearly shows that human appearance itself does not make individuals a person. The 17th century philosopher René Descartes eliminated this concept from the quest for the essence of mankind. When he saw that a person passed by the window of the street under him he said he saw a hat and cloak that could cover the artificial machine and said that the move might be determined by spring. In other words, even if you are looking at someone, even if you interact with someone, you can not provide sufficient evidence of personal existence. People lead erroneous conclusions based on insufficient evidence

Cognitive psychology definition paper 2 cognitive psychology definition paper cognitive psychology test heart. Brain and mind are thought to be two different things. The brain is an organ and the brain is the result of a personal thought process. In this article we will study exactly what cognitive psychology is, milestones in the development of cognitive psychology, and behavior observation in cognitive psychology. Definition of cognitive psychology Cognitive psychology is responsible for examining psychological processes and understanding why individuals do what they are doing. Some of the principles that it examines are personal perception, learning, attention, reasoning, memory, and problem solving. Everyone's recognition is different. Individuals use her or his perception to form judgments and thoughts about her or her environment. Everyone has different learning methods, which affect everyone's learning method. We will focus on how we handle the information collected by individuals. Display memory saved information of memory. Please keep only important information for individuals. Individuals do not retain information that is not important. Problem solving and reasoning affect selection Running Head: Definition of Cognitive Psychology 1 Definition of Cognitive Psychology Heather Burgess PSY 360 October 24, 1013 Dr. Matt Pearcey Definition of Cognitive Psychology 2 Definition of Cognitive Psychology Cognitive psychology is about learning, memory, perception And research on the psychological processes of thinking. As an official field of psychology, its roots can go back to Descartes, which tries to explain how thinking works and proposes analogy of "hydraulic system of neural function". 2007, p. 26) He observed a moving image at Saint-Germain-en-Laye. It is not only a constant pursuit of how the mind works, but also a merciless pursuit of the spiritual composition that ultimately constitutes the basis of cognitive theory. It is clear that different approaches are needed when psychologists study how psychological processes produce behavior. It only thinks of what I learned through rewards and punishments. Cognitive psychology definition paper 2 cognitive psychology definition paper cognitive psychology test heart. Brain and mind are thought to be two different things. The brain is an organ and the brain is the result of a personal thought process. In this article we will study exactly what cognitive psychology is, milestones in the development of cognitive psychology, and behavior observation in cognitive psychology. Definition of cognitive psychology Cognitive psychology is responsible for examining psychological processes and understanding why individuals do what they are doing. Some of the principles that it examines are personal perception, learning, attention, reasoning, memory, and problem solving. Everyone's recognition is different. Individuals use her or his perception to form judgments and thoughts about her or her environment. Everyone has different learning methods, it affects the way anyone learns The term "cognitive psychology" was first used in "cognitive psychology" authored by American psychologist Ulric Neisser in 1967. According to Neisser, cognition includes "all processes in which perceptual input is transformed, reduced, sophisticated, stored, restored, and used". Neisser also suggests that in recognition of such broad and broad definition, recognition includes everything and people. That's all. do it. For example, a memory experiment may include participants randomly assigned to performing a series of memory tests to determine whether a particular change in condition results in a change in memory capability. By using a rigorous empirical approach, psychologists can accurately determine that it is an independent variable that causes a change rather than other factors.

Things are very different from one another and can be divided into small groups within yourself. And people and Greek thinkers noticed this as early as about 400 BC. By using words like "element" or "atom" you can represent different parts, even the smallest parts. These ideas have existed for more than 2000 years ago, and ideas like water to explain the "elements" of the earth, fire, air, and "things of the world" came out. For the first time in a while, experimenters like Galileo and Bacon were greatly influenced by Democritus, Gasendi and Descartes. These played a very important role in the atomic field theory of the 17th century. . 2 History of the Periodic Table Mendeleev places the elements in the world's first periodic table, Mendeleev puts the elements in the world's first periodic table, compares the number of elements that react with each other, increases the atomic weight, I will increase it. Modern periodic table is different from Mendeleev table - he does not know that protons and electrons are different from Mendeleev table - he does not understand that protons and electrons increase the number of atoms Mass proton number proton number It is not a mass increasing atom number than an electron number electron number Please watch the periodic table A carefully. The history of the periodic table Mendeleev arranged these elements in the world's first periodic table and Mendeleev arranged this element. The history of the periodic table reflects deepening understanding of chemical properties for more than a century. The most important event in history took place when Dmitri Mendeleev published this table in 1869. It was based on the early discovery of scientists such as Antoine-Laurent de Lavoisier and John Newlands, but their trust Many physical elements (platinum, mercury, tin, zinc, etc.) It is known for a long time because it is present and it is relatively easy to miner with primitive tools. Around 330 BC, Greek philosopher Aristotle proposed that everything be composed of more than one root, but this idea was originally proposed by Sicilian philosopher imperialists. The four roots that were later renamed elements by Plato are soil, water, air, and fire Another long form of elemental periodic table has been proposed. The earliest one described by A. Werner in 1905 divides each shorter period into two parts at the end of the table for their most similar longer period elements. Therefore, a plurality of connection lines connecting the periods of the Bailey type table are omitted. This type of table can also be greatly simplified by deleting the elements of the lanthanide and act system in different areas. By the middle of the 20th century, this version table (Figure 1) is now most commonly used

Enlightenment, the philosophical movement of the 18th century, is characterized by the power of human reasons and innovation in politics, religion, and educational theory. Pre-entertainment, noun · pre-entertainment, noun Definition of British pre-entertainment dictionary In the 1660's, "inspired behavior" was born from Enlightenment + -ment. It is used only for figurative meaning, spiritual enlightenment, etc. In 1865, as a translation of German Aufklärung, the name of the spirit and institution of the mainland philosopher of the 18th century The philosophy of enlightenment adheres to the essential autonomy of human beings. People are responsible to themselves, responsible for their own reasonable interests, responsible for their own self-development, and responsible for the welfare of their brothers by inevitable expansion. For philosophers, people are not sinners, at least not born; humanity - this statement is destructive by its origin, in fact is revolutionary, or by origin, or at least neutral. In this way, human antisocial passion has undeniable power, but individuals may want to improve through their own efforts instead of prayer, instead of education, participation in politics, and reform activities Hmm. [Peter Gay, "Enlightenment"] New Culture Literacy Dictionary, 3rd Edition Copyright © 2005 Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company. Houghton Published by Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company. Copyright Okay, men and girls, ready to enlightenment In this lesson I will introduce enlightenment. what is that? Enlightenment, also known as the age of enlightenment, was an intellectual movement from the late 17th century to the early 18th century, emphasizing reasons, individualism, and skepticism. Enlightenment challenged the traditional religious view. Because that was such a wide movement, enlightenment did not have an accurate start date. It did not pop up, but it gradually developed. Most historians came to the beginning of enlightenment from the middle of the 17th century to the beginning of the 18th century. The work of intellectuals like Rene Descartes, Barus Spinoza, Isaac Newton is particularly important for enlightenment. It is impossible to talk about enlightenment unless we talk about the political leap of this age. Historians follow the scientific beginning of enlightenment to Principal Mathematicala written by Sir Isaac Newton in 1686. This work is considered to be a major part of philosophy driving science, mathematics, and enlightenment, in combination with John Locke's "Papers on Human Understanding" (1689). It is said that enlightenment really started in the American Revolutionary War of 1776. The idea of ​​rotation around people's minds by writers like Thomas Paine, John Locke, Thomas Jefferson, eventually attempted the Republic for the first time in Roman times. As with the rest of enlightenment, the founders of the United States returned to the classical era and planned how they would like to manage their new country.

Great theorists and philosophers of knowledge networks such as Stoic Sc ​​hool, Skeptics, Aristotle, St. Thomas Aquinas, Descartes, Spinoza, Locke, Hume, Berkeley, Kant, Burt. Lan Russell, Darwin, Freud, and all the science of the 20th century are all working hard on being a matter of knowledge. Do you have knowledge? "Knowing" and "knowledge" are powerful concepts Before receiving text and criticism, I think it is natural that I know what knowledge is. Then, I have a simple question. After reading "American scholars", I remembered that the class was asked "What is the relationship between nature and knowledge?" There is no answer. A consumer-centered knowledge network is a knowledge network that focuses on the knowledge consumers are interested in and controlled by consumers. There must be a very gray portion between all knowledge and consumer-centered knowledge, but knowledge-oriented processes, including consumer interests, are important. The Consumer Knowledge Network is a platform for consumer-centered knowledge-based applications. One of the ongoing discussions is knowledge gathering through knowledge mining (knowledge of mining) and clearly constructed knowledge. Specifically, we wait to convert to an explicit knowledge structure expressed as a semantic web, or automatically generate enough knowledge structures by text mining, data mining, and even knowledge mining ? Consumer-centric knowledge network - Consumer application vision for software agent technology - Implementation of consumer-centered knowledge-based computing The knowledge network is part of the semantic web and focuses on knowledge. A knowledge network is not just a collection of static coding knowledge. Always knowledge is constantly being created through active processes and services. Software agents play an important role in supporting the generation of knowledge networks and new knowledge. Knowledge networks are not just information repositories, they should be viewed as platforms for knowledge - based applications. Consumer-centric knowledge network - Consumer application vision for software agent technology - Implementation of consumer-centered knowledge-based computing Consumer networks are part of a network that focuses on consumer interests compared to consumer networks and consumer knowledge networks become part of the semantic web or knowledge network that focuses on consumer interests Let's see. The consumer web is driven by user navigation, but the consumer knowledge web is driven by the activities of software agents representing consumers. In order to emphasize the center of software agent technology in achieving vision, the assumed network should really be called a consumer / agent knowledge network. Not only is a software agent used for implementation, but each consumer is a consumer / agent knowledge Web as a partnership in which software agents working on behalf of consumers are essentially part of the minds of consumers It is necessary to conceptualize. Consumer-centric knowledge network - Consumer application vision for software agent technology - Implementation of consumer-centered knowledge-based computing

About 25 centuries ago, the first Greek philosopher Miletus (624-560 BC) replaced the myths with a series of theories that made up a more systematic and realistic view of nature. To some extent, the empirical proposition based on world observation is a feature of Thales 'aeon natural philosophy' and provides the first clue as to how the physical system is modeled. The origin of this scientific speculation is that Thales asks for the use of knowledge, the development of scientific methods, and practical ways to develop them into general utilitarian principles. Cynicism was a group of philosophies of ancient Greece originally called Sinicism (this paper) established by Antisthenes. Today, this term usually refers to people who tend not to believe human sincerity, virtue, or altruism. People believe that only their own interests can stimulate human behavior. The modern scenic is a social norm, especially for those who tend to treat ritual purposes rather than real purpose, citizens' faith, traditional ethics, and accepted wisdom as irrelevant It is very derogatory. Or outdated nonsense The political philosophy of the West comes from the philosophy of ancient Greece, where the political philosophy can trace at least to Plato. Ancient Greece was dominated by a city state, urban countries experimented with various forms of political organization, Plato was divided into the stability and moral decline of the five categories: monarchy, binary politics, oligarchicism, Democracy, and tyranny. One of the first and most important classics of political philosophy is Plato Republic, followed by Aristotle's "Nikumark Ethics and Politics". Roman political philosophy was influenced by Stoic Sc ​​hool and Roman politician Cicero. In a sense, the philosophy of the mind came from philosophy itself. Starting with immortal reflection on Plato's soul, the theme related to what we call "philosophy of the heart" has never disappeared in philosophical discussion. Aristotle's reflections, in stark contrast to the doctrine of Plato doctrine, are focused on various intelligence analyzes throughout the Middle Ages and even today, based on methods that have been observed for many years. Descartes dualism - one of the basic themes that has been discussed since the beginning of the 17th century - has proved to be one of the strongest psychosomatic relationships in the history of philosophy.

Johann Wolfgang von Goetheyan Wolfgang von Goethe was born in Frankfurt, Germany on August 28, 1849 and died on Weimar in Germany on March 22, 1832. Goethe was only 82 years old when he died, lived in modern times. Goethe is a German poet, writer, scientist, theater director, critic and amateur artist. He is considered to be the greatest German literary in modern times. Goethe was born in a big house in Frankfurt, Germany. As Goethe grew, he received education at home. His father and his personal tutor gave him a course in all their common subjects, especially languages ​​at that time. Writers, scholars, visual artists, amateur scientists, politicians, John Wolfgang von Goethe are talented people. "Young Witte" is not his most famous work - this distinction belongs to the drama "Faust" - a two part tragedy - but this work is a pioneer as his literary celebrity. After a terrible division, Goethe wrote his first novel with six weeks of writing. A few years ago, Goethe met a woman named Charlotte Buff and fell in love. She refused his progress, but married an art collector and a diplomat. In 1722, Goethe's philosopher and acquaintance Karl Jerusalem shot himself with a pistol borrowed from a female fiance who did not love him. Goethe combined these two different events to form the foundation of the "Young Walter" story. Abstract: In this article we will explore "subtle empiricism" proposed by Johann Wolfgang von Goethe. Goethe's scientific research provides another epistemology for traditional science. The author discusses the way that Goethe knows. Particular emphasis is placed on the process, form and participation of the epistemology expressed by Goethe. I introduced Goethe's scientific methodology and explored its application and its significance. Goethe's "Zalte Empirie" - his subtle empiricism - legalizes and organizes the role of imagination, intuition, and inspiration in science. It may make a significant contribution to the emerging participatory and holistic worldview and provide knowledge that is compatible with nature. In this article we will explore its methods and reasons. The first attempt to provide an alternative or complementary epistemological perspective to Descartes-Kant epistemology was proposed by poets, scientists and politicians John Wolfgang von Goethe. In the last article I introduced the familiarity with the texts of Goethe's seal and alchemy and the potential interests of his understanding of nature over the life of alchemy and interest in his work. The scientific method provides the first clear thing, as pointed out by Richard Tanas, whose epistemological views were later presented by Schiller, Schering, Hegel, Coleric, Emerson and others. .... Rudolph Steiner has developed in a new direction. Each of these thinkers have paid their own attention to the prospects of development, but they all share the same basic belief that human thought and the relationship of the world are eventually participatory rather than alternative is. "48

A strictly defined self concept is the integrity of our beliefs, preferences, opinions and attitudes towards the organization of our personal lives in a systematic way. In short, this is how we look at ourselves and how we think about, act and act on various role of life. Self may be the most complex unit of psychology research. Each person has different personality, character, ability, and preference. And sometimes we can not understand the real situation in our minds. While it may not be possible to explain exactly why we think like this or why we do so, self-concept theory is a good basis for the importance of our perception of individual survival It is knowledge. In order to study this theory, we first need to understand the history of the development of self-conceptual theory. The earliest milestone in self conceptualism was Rene Descartes, and it suggested that the existence of a person depends on the way he sees it. Sigmund Freud is one of the most famous psychologists and advocates a number of theories to talk about our internal psychological processes. In his theory, we are considered to have three main aspects, id (happiness oriented), self (balance between id and superego), and super ego (led conscience). The self-concept theory has many assumptions about our personal judgment about ourselves. I will introduce some of them. The very basic assumption of this theory is that no one is born with a self-concept. Self conception is thought to develop as people age. This means that our perception of ourself can be shaped and changed, and it may also be affected by environmental factors. In this sense, the concept of self is actually the product of socialization and development. Some may think that myself and other people have different opinions about themselves. For example, one thinks that he is very generous and others think he is selfish. People may have many opinions about themselves. He may be kind, patient, considerate and considerate, or selfish, cruel, rude, and stubborn. Regardless of how many different opinions you have about yourself, there is still the idea to promote all of these insights and form an organized self-concept. When people believe in something consistent with their self-concept, he is more likely to resist changes in this belief. He now tends to insist that he himself is watching himself for a long time, and changing his own view this may take a long time, but the change is viable. When a person encounters various situations and new challenges in life, the insight about himself may change depending on how he responds to the change in the person's life. What we see depends on our self-concept. Our behavior is consistent with our viewpoint under certain circumstances. Therefore, self-concept is ongoing development, we tend to give up ones and ideas contradictory to self-concept, and we strongly insist on building those better views of those I will help. To be present What do you think about yourself? Do you know what they think they can do to make a big difference to the degree that people actually do it? The self-image of a person depends on what we always tell ourselves. Remember, each of us decided the way we see ourselves. Do you think you are a hero, or do you think it is a victim? Do you believe that you have a growing attitude and you believe you can concentrate on control (attitude and effort) and can improve on a daily basis, or do you believe that you are determined and actions do not change What? When you believe in yourself, you love the person looking back in the mirror. You see lots of possibilities. You are looking at a person worth investing. You see someone worthy of love and life. You will see someone who can get better. In the speech after the actor Matthew McConaughey won the Oscar award, he says: "Someone asked me who my hero is, personally come to me and say" "Are you a hero? I like it." 'She said' Why? "My hero is 35 years old," so my hero has always be