Woman is a Rational Animal

A woman is a rational animal "But when I think that there is a very powerful thing, as I am talking about now, will a malicious fraudster deliberately try to deceive me?" (Decartes, 19). These words by Descartes appear to be directly related to the fraud theme of Princesse De Cleves. In a world that is a mere fictitious world created by inevitable appearance, there is nothing that is so crave and respectful that it seems to be reasoning about the circumstances for public interest initially .

"Man is not a reasonable animal, he is a rationalized animal," Robert A Heinlein wrote once. In the universe we do not understand, spiritual stories make a furious sound with a sense of athletes deeply wearing scorpions when we walk on a black sea on a spinning ball . Our actions are based on the conditions we accumulated here. Most of them come from other people who showed their own conditions accumulated from generation to generation.

We say that humans are rational animals. They are not composed of animals and reason. We say that humans are the third entity of soul and body, and it is neither of them. People are said to be composed of animals and reason, but that is not the third reality, but the third concept. Unity and community are included in the definition of universality, but since they are not human beings, there is essentially no universal nature. Also, we can not say that human nature possesses genus or species characteristics. Because it is not seen in that person that the person's property belongs to all essences. Human nature has species characteristics only through existence in intelligence. As it has intelligence, this property has no seed characteristics unless it involves that accident

The human reason is not mere perception of highly advanced animals. The human reason is qualitatively different from the perception of animals - it differs in ontology. Human reasons are different as it is irrelevant. Since universality is not itself important and can not be materialized as a problem, there is no material realization of thinking about universality. I am here to emphasize the difference between expression and materialization. Represents a map of things. Instantiation is itself a thing. Universality can be expressed material - the words I write in this article are conceptual representations - but universality can not be materialized in material terms. I can not write the concept itself on a computer screen or paper and these concepts can not exist in my brain. Because the universal concept is not important