A Materialist Rejection of the View that the Mind is Merely Reactive

Materialism refuses the idea that the mind is just a reaction Today we believe that everything is material and our idea is chemical and electronic . One implication of this materialistic concept is that our idea reacts only to external stimuli. This is due to a causal relationship. The two reasons for causality are that each effect (or event) has a cause. Nothing happened. Secondly, the causal relationship has a predictable relationship.

Leibniz refuses the materialist concept of the mind and strongly opposed the relationship between the body and the mind, in particular the dual view of material dualism embodied in Descartes and his philosophy. According to this dualism, the world contains fundamentally two different substances: extended substance (body) and unexpanded thought substance (thought). Of course, this kind of fork does not lead to psychological manipulation by physical manipulation. But he insists that consciousness and perception can not be achieved by mechanical manipulation of the substance, but without decreasing, Leibniz discovered a similar surprising alternative assuming two different substances.

In short, Leibniz has a special place in the historical view of thought and its important relationship. He opposes the position of the materialist and believes that thinking and consciousness can be caught purely by mechanical principles. But he also rejects the dualistic position that the universe has to be divided into two different substances, ideological substances and material substances. Instead, he believes the world will consist of only one substance despite the existence of countless kinds of substances. These substances are unstructured unexpanded entities, some of which have thought and consciousness, others find phenomena in the material world. The sum of these views guarantees Leibniz 's unique position in the history of spiritual philosophy.

Professor Trukien and the hippies refuse (1) the view of "rationalistic progress" of history as a series of remarkable improvements in the past, and (2) the belief that matter theory is all decisive determinants ing. While Professor Trukien and Hippie just agree to refuse rather than reasons for refusal, our relatives here may make hippies feel safe in the world of Lord of the Rings. But they also noticed that this explanation was inappropriate and certainly was not enough to explain "popularity of President Gandalf". Or "Frodo live!" The truth is that the work presented at the appropriate time resonates with certain people at one time; the story of a peaceful and stable hobbit and evil modem empire occurs in the American military draft Time is for an unwelcome war ...