Are Spinozistic Ideas Cartesian Judgements?

That is the idea of ​​the Spinnock style of Descartes' judgment. Abstract; Some of Spinoza's critics believe that the idea of ​​Spinonozia is a judgment. As Spinoza is interpreted as responding to Descartes' ideological theory, he considers Spinosian thought to be a Cartesian judgment rather than Cartesian thought, so I call this view a common interpretation. The most obvious difference between Descartes and Spinoza is that descartes considers thinking passive, but Spinoza thinks the opposite is true.

A: For clarity, I have never mentioned Descartes linguistics I did. Cover It is related to Descartes (and sometimes influenced by it), but it is often proposed by Descartes critics. Strictly speaking, there is no Cartesian linguistics. As discussed in CL, although the use of the term "concept" of Descartes is not entirely clear, he seems to be using it extensively, so the language expression usually consists of individual It is not a concept but an idea. It is within range. If so, then the language will belong to the concept of his natural tendency - and it is difficult to see how the attributes he mentioned in his language reference are obtained.

I want to know what Descartes meant when I talked about his important introduction. As background, I discovered an important part of the Cartesian heritage; Descartes doubts - casts doubt on everything you know. In today's world, this idea seems to be very old-fashioned. We tend to question everything up to the point of skepticism. For Descartes, doubt is the opposite of reason. Descartes' suspicion has made scientific progress possible over the past 200 years. The medieval society believed that humans existed because God wants them to exist. Descartes does not doubt the existence of God, I doubt that the existence of man is God's desire. He has a problem because he proved the existence of God using a series of theorems. He proved that thought is the essence of thinking

Discussions in Spinosian language are related to God rather than humans, but the discussion of Descartes is related to humans from Spinoza's point of view. From there build and summarize most of his evidence. Descartes' view on will and intelligence is supported by very reasonable evidence, "I think this is something like". When the will is limited to understanding, I think that Spinoza appears and confidently and clearly confident that things are definite until destroying it with his will, wisdom and essential deductive conclusion I will. I now believe that there are substances with infinite attributes. Each represents an eternal essence.