Innate Knowledge and Death

Using innate knowledge is a mystery that disrupts the knowledgeable male and female generation and denies the ability to present certain actual knowledge like casserol shared by family and company picnics. Everyone enters inside, you can realize understanding of the substance from the resource without having physical knowledge, and you can make your knowledge the same. According to the advanced English dictionary, knowledge is "psychological result of perception, learning and reasoning", the mind is "a place responsible for my thought and emotion, a place of reasonable ability", and the last knowledge is "knowledge The body of the mind to decide ".

Rationalist: I believe rationalists have natural knowledge; their difference is that they choose different innate knowledge objects. Plato is a rationalist, believing that we understand the shape naturally, because he believes that Descartes understands God's thought, or perfection and infinity, and my own existence. Born; Nom Chomsky believes that the ability to use language (such as language rules) is congenital. 1. Empiricism is simpler: compared to empiricism, rationalism also has existing entities. That is congenital knowledge. According to the empiricist, the innate knowledge is unobservable and ineffective, that is, I do not do anything. Knowledge is there and may never be used. Using Occam's razor (a simple theory is better when deciding the competition theory to explain the same phenomenon), one empiricism is a better theory.

Chomsky's view of talent: If one thinks that language is their way of doing things due to my natural language knowledge, this natural language knowledge theory can serve as a theory about any language at the same time. What language theory. Why are they doing this? But surprisingly, many linguists rejecting Chomsky's talent seem to implicitly accept Chomsky's view that a single theory fulfills both theoretical goals. In particular, although many functionalists came up with various explanations on why the language is completely different from the language of Chomsky, they often describe the language as a problem in the field of formal linguists who describe the description theory I see. Problems are confused to explain theoretical problems

In Chomsky's view, language ability includes innate knowledge of various language rules, constraints, and principles, and this congenital knowledge constitutes the "initial state" of language ability. Dialogue with the language experiences of a childhood person - when it comes to touching what Chomsky calls "first language data" or "pld", it creates new things. The language knowledge system, knowledge A specific language (such as Chinese or English). The state of this "reached" or "final" language ability constitutes the "language ability" of a person and includes knowledge of language grammar. According to Mr. Chomsky, this knowledge is important for the ability to speak and understand language (which of course is not enough, it will help to further improve "language performance"). Knowledge, use of actual language)