The Effects of Aristotelian Teleological Thought on Darwin's Mechanistic Views of Evolution

Influence of Aristotle's scopostury on Darwin's mechanical evolution theory Since the birth of biology, understanding biological needs is a scientific goal that has been pursued by people. History shows that Aristotle and Charles Darwin are among the most powerful biologists ever. Aristotle's objective approach has been widely endorsed and has a history of more than 2000 years. One scientist commented that Aristotle's theory of purpose is "a ghost all the time, it is a mystery of unknown cause that has tormented biology throughout history" (Ayala, 10).

Darwin abandoned the last trace of Aristotle's thought on biological evolution. The current explanation no longer exists. According to "grand design", the evolution of life on Earth will no longer evolve; it will not be the ultimate cause. Instead, interest in random mutations has increased, and it is promoted by natural selection. Humans are agents and ... the center of impulsive activities - "scopos theory" activity ... looking ... concrete and objective non-personal ending. ... He likes effective work and hates wasteful efforts. He understands the function and efficiency of the service, and the shortcomings of uselessness, waste, incompetence. Process Instinct

In the present era, for some people the words "evolution" and "god" may seem unlikely to become bedclothes (see Scoposteri). This is primarily because today's biologist rejects the visual view of evolution and is shifting to a more mechanical perspective. It is generally thought that the process of refusal began with Descartes and reached Darwin's theory of evolution through natural selection. The basic idea of ​​natural selection is the idea of ​​changing through a common lineage. This means that all living things are related to one another; for the two species, looking backwards, we see that they are descendants of a common ancestor. This is a totally different view of Aristotle's great existence chain, where each species is formed separately, its own purpose and place is in nature, and the seed does not evolve into new. It is a seed. Evolution by natural selection is a purely mechanical change theory, and it does not affect purpose consciousness and designers. There is essentially no vision or purpose, and it does not mean that one species is more perfect than the others. Only the pressure of choice from the environment will bring about change