Skepticism and doubt are attitudes that recognize our own mistakes and we tend to mistake ourselves and ourself around self through selfish prejudice. When we have a healthy doubt, we are aware that everyone is seeing the world through limited, limited and dark glasses. Suspicion is the guardian of the truth, humble me. It allows us to find mistakes and achieve growth. When we accept our own opinion and the teachings of others, we ask that we keep a part of ourselves and notice that each of us is incomplete. When correcting what others will blame us, we can carefully consider their views with doubt rather than assuming they are wrong. It opened the door to growth Debank is not a skepticism. Anti-theme is not skepticism. It is not skeptical to target specific enemies "specific" conclusions to multiple topics. Skepticism does not mean doubt for everything. Skepticism is not cynical. It is not a tool for self-propagation. It is not an identity. Skepticism is a way of thinking. It is not a way of evaluating an assertion - only science can do this. This is an example of a skeptical error case. What obviously is skepticism - I outlined many of these examples in previous articles. Even though not so important it is important to understand skepticism or what it should be like. Possibility of knowledge skepticism - skeptical; I doubt the truth of something. In ordinary skepticism, this means that someone doubts the existence of something. The difference between the two is that the usual skepticism is what you are trying to express clearly in your mind. Normal doubt, or partial doubt, can usually be tested - even if it is not tested, there may be time. Many philosophers have explanations about their own version and skepticism. Skeptics denied People who follow the philosophy of skepticism just doubt all the truth. But skeptics suspect they are skeptics; does he suspect his real opinion? If so, why should you pay attention to the doubt? Otherwise, at least one thing (in other words, the existence of absolute truth) - Ironically, we can assure that suspicion is the absolute truth in this case. Agnosticians say you can not know the truth. But this idea is self - disciplined, as it claims to know at least one truth. You can not understand the truth.

Max Black and Humean's skepticism This article claims that there is really a problem only when Humean's induction problem gives a strange and impossible definition of "rational". I will first explain what it is I will understand Hume's induction and try to enrich problems related to my affair. Then I will study the problem solving proposed by Max Black and explain where the solution is useful and why it is ultimately unconvincing. In the latter case, I call Wesley Salmon's work and try to solve the problem raised by Salmon. It is this if Hume emphasizes these conceptual contradictions is a unique aspect of his skepticism and if any part of his philosophy can be called "Hume skepticism" it is this . But during his writing he changed his view on the essence of these contradictions. He initially felt that these contradictions are limited to the theory about the outside world, but as explained here, the theory of the mind itself will not be affected by them. Or, more precisely, their speculation, including contradiction and absurdity. But since the perceptions of the mind are well known, I've always considered all the possible thoughts in making a conclusion about them, so I will always skip these discrepancies. Max Black and Humean's skepticism This article claims that there is really a problem only when Humean's induction problem gives a strange and impossible definition of "rational". I will first explain what it is I will understand Hume's induction and try to enrich problems related to my affair. Then I will study the problem solving proposed by Max Black and explain where the solution is useful and why it is ultimately unconvincing. In the latter case, I call Wesley Salmon's work and try to solve the problem raised by Salmon. In George Schuler 's 1931 novel "Black No Longer", Dr. Junis Croukmann developed a revolutionary process that allows blacks to become white. After being rejected by a white woman, Max Disher has become one of his first clients. Black Max becomes a white mat. He married Helen, invaded the white supremacist organization, ran away from Europe for several million dollars. At the same time, as more and more blacks become whites, black leaders lose power and the United States loses cheap labor. This country is confused. Then, I found that 'new' white can be identified because it is lighter than 'primitive' white. Therefore, the United States has abandoned the concept of white dominance, but on the contrary, everyone wants to purchase a cream that makes the skin darker. Now, black becomes beautiful. Ironically, Schuler explained the absurdity of racial discrimination.

This book is a collection of important works on skepticism offered by those who provide a survey of the most important issues of our time. The leading question in this volume is "Whether you can understand the external world of external things". Can you understand the inner world of the inner mind condition? This work is divided into four parts. A priori discussion on skepticism, II. Semantic answer to skepticism, III. Self-recognition, and IV. Skepticism and cognitive closure Edited by Kjellberg, Paul, Philip J. Ivanhoe. A paper on Ryoko's skepticism, relativism, ethics. Albany: New York State University Press. Cook, Scott, editor. In 2003, "the world of the hidden world: Ryoko's unbalanced discourse". Albany: New York State University Press, p. 317. Graham, Angus C., 1986. "Reprinted on the philosophy of philosophy and philosophy in China, Singapore: East Asian Institute of Philosophy, Chuan Two of Angan C · Graham of Hoangle, University of Hawaii, published in 2003." 2018 8/6 Philosophy / logic - inductive my thesis on recursive length questions Inductive thesis: 1208 words (35 double space pages) Evaluation: carefully selected papers open the choice of document preview 'skepticism Target. All of this can be explained by the concept of natural contradiction, proposed as a solution to the problem of recurrence in the philosophy of science. The concept is just a philosophical treatment. Philosophy (Greek, philosophy, literally from love for wisdom) is a regressive argument about the situation of general and fundamental research doubting the requirements of knowledge. This volume is a collection of papers on various subjects of epistemology at the 2004 Northwest Inland Philosophy Conference and is divided into two papers on 10 papers on "knowledge" and 4 papers on "skepticism". This diversity is the biggest obstacle that the volume must overcome. This is what the editor knows (this paper is described as "eclectic but coherent"), it is not clear whether this achievement succeeded or not. Four papers are somehow focused on epistemological contextualism (David Hemp, Duncan Pritchard, Kent Bach, and Robert Stainton), this is as close as volume reaches the subject uniformity

There was not enough time to develop these observed features for thousands of years, and there was not enough time to explain sediment deposition. Sediment: slow collection of geological structure due to rainfall and runoff erosion, material wear will slowly accumulate in riverbeds and waters. These deposits then pass through the river network as melt loads, suspended loads, or bounces along the river bed (Lutgens & Tarbuck, 2014). When these sediments are carried to the sea, the delta forms a huge stratum that the river and the ocean meet. Earth era: rebellion against skepticism In the history, science has always faced challenges from outside groups. After the heritage of the flat world and the Earth - centered universe, the creationists of the young earth tend to adapt science to their interpretation of the origin of the earth and the timeline. Ancient evidence on the earth exists in every field of the earth science and directly rebuts against claimed assertions. Descartes denied skepticism in 1641. George Berkeley denied skepticism in 1710. Bouwsma denied skepticism in 1949. Hillary · Putnam dismissed skepticism in 1981. The classicist who disputes the skeptical form is Descartes 'meditation' - it also causes famous realism to reject skepticism. Indeed, Descartes is the main inventor of the philosophical cause of skepticism and indispensable to modern philosophy and attention to its understanding. References to Descartes and many other things share Descartes' refutation with refusal of skepticism. Berkeley, Bouwsma, and Putnam provide complex and weakened counterarguments that impair the consistency of skepticism In this article, I will study René Descartes' suspicion and reaction to Britain. Bouwsma and Norman Malcolm Bouwsma and Malcolm argued against criticism of certain parts of Descartes' claim, but I will prove that this is not enough to refute the whole. In order to understand Descartes' argument and sometimes radical view, we need at least a general understanding of the motivation for discussion. The 17th century was an era of advancement of science, the prosperous scientific community was interested in establishing consistent standards to define what science is. Their science is based on a combination of experience and experience, and ideally there is no prejudice to contaminate the results. However, Descartes believes that the sensation is unreliable, and that science based only on sensory information is uncertain.

Skepticism of Western society about reincarnation "Whether people are here or after, ideas are things, parents of all actions, good or bad, just like sowing, harvest is also true "It will finally be the last 500 painting puzzles.What is my greatest accomplishment with my grandmother.We work continuously for a few days and we put it under the table cloth on the table Her grandmother came and kissed me with a big hug. Much of today's Western culture is skeptical of past life experiences. Because we still could not prove reincarnation in scientific way - even if half of the world believes it. (For example, no one brought back ancient Roman coins from the hypnotic reincarnation session.) In recent decades, many people in the West have become interested in reincarnation. Recent research has accepted the concept of reincarnation, such as contemporary people from the Catholic family, modern newcomers, believers of spirituality, theorists, students of mysterious philosophy such as Kabbalah, and Gnosticism . And mysterious Christianity and believers in India. It is a religion. According to the census data of 1999-2002, a few people from Europe and America have reasonable thought and freedom of thought, but there is no outstanding tradition of being born recently. Reborn. The average of the Nordic countries is 22%. In the Baltic countries, belief in reincarnation is particularly high, Lithuania is the largest population in Europe, accounting for 44%. The lowest figure is East Germany, 12% Karl Sagan is suspected to have asked Dalai Lama what he would do if the basic principle of his religion (reborn) was clearly denied by science. The Dalai Lama replied: 'If Taiwanese Buddhism would give up on reincarnation if science could object to the reborn children of the soul, it would be very difficult to resist reincarnation.' Walter and Review of 1999 research by Waterhouse 30 thorough interviews with the UK people who do not belong to past data and religious reincarnation on the level of reincarnation belief. The authors report that in the survey it was revealed that about a fifth to a quarter of Europeans have some degree of confidence in similar results as in the United States. In the interviewed group, the beliefs about the existence of this phenomenon seem to be unrelated to their age and the type of religion to which these people belong, mostly Christians.

Skeptical skepticism is one of the themes of the movie "Dark City". Of the skeptical observations observed, four are particularly important. They include cave fables, Descartes' evil genius theory, Ommfalos hypothesis, and simulation hypotheses. The fable of the cave dark city is a perfect example of a cave fable presented by Platon in the form of a dialogue between Socrates and Glaucon. By comparing humans to prisoners in the cave, Plato considers what we see is a shadow cast on the walls, but we misunderstand them as "forms". Dark Knight (Nolan, 2008) Dark Knight is one of the modern and great city movies. Batman and clown (Christian Bell and Heath Leisure) play cats and mice with Gotham's fragmented infrastructure. This is a hot summer of the Bush era, since all templates of Blockbuster and clowns of ledger have been the decisive performance of the 21st century. Serious people (Cohen, 2009) Coen's brothers produced many classics, but this is their masterpiece. A very sad "job" was against the "serious man" in the 1960s, and Michael Stewart played a professional role in exploring Jewish status in American society. Mysterious and evil wonder Skeptical skepticism is one of the themes of the movie "Dark City". Of the skeptical observations observed, four are particularly important. They include cave fables, Descartes' evil genius theory, Ommfalos hypothesis, and simulation hypotheses. 1. The fable of the dark city of the cave is a perfect example of a cave fable presented by Platon in the form of a dialogue between Socrates and Glaucon. By comparing humans to prisoners in the cave, Plato considers what we see is a shadow cast on the walls, but we misunderstand them as "forms". Conclusion about the fable of the cave. However, this movie has a relationship with Plato 's ontology and phenomenon so it is difficult to distinguish between understandable areas and easy to understand areas. Plato's beliefs are interpreted and modernized in the film, proving that Plato's four truths are embodied in the conclusion of his cave fables. Pleasantville helps spectators understand Plato's conclusion from cave fables. Plato first

In other words, circular reasoning is excluded from justification and the underlying cause is inappropriate due to lack of further reason. If both conditions apply, the chain of causes of some belief can be infinite or infinite. The unrestricted problem is that there are infinite beliefs, regardless of whether they have a potential belief or not. Human has limited thinking and limited life There is no reason to form defense anymore after many doubts. Epistemological skepticism is the lack or justification of knowledge of a particular group of individual propositions (Barnett, 2014). The doubt of all propositions is called global skepticism, which reveals the lack of knowledge (2014). The regression problem is a difficult point of epistemology and one has to be reasonable (2014), since further defense must be inferred in the defense itself. The conclusion of the infinite regression argument is that the individual lacks legitimacy. Epistemological and moral skepticism is a subcategory of theory and its members include Pyronian moral skepticism and doctrinal moral skepticism. All members of epistemologic moral skepticism have two things in common: firstly they acknowledge that it is unreasonable for us to believe in any moral argument. . I believe that the moral skepticism of the Proninian does not make sense why he believes in moral assertion because he believes that moral assertion is truthful or moral assertion is irrational in thinking it is wrong . Therefore, apart from not knowing whether (i) is true or not, the Poronian's moral skepticism is negative (ii). Contracts between reasons and truth epistemology and methods of knowledge production, and questions about different knowledge claims. The problem is what people know. At the heart of this research area is skepticism, many of which involve attempts to refute certain forms of school. In this article we discuss the skepticism of epistemological schools, the creation of contributors to schools, and how the schools developed from there. Skepticism is a questioning point about the validity of some or all of human knowledge. Skepticism does not refer to a specific philosophy school, it refers to clues to many philosophical arguments about epistemology. The first well-known Greek skeptic was Socrates, his only knowledge was that he did not know anything about his resolve. In Indian philosophy, Sanjaya Belatthiputta is a famous skeptic and the Buddhist Madhyamika school is considered a form of skepticism. Descartes' heart and body's most famous survey also began with skepticism movements. Descartes began to question the validity of all knowledge and looked for facts unreliefable. By doing so, he came to his famous motto: I think, so I

As the results seem to be related to me, I do not only accept the results. Some people say that taking skepticism is not the best way to gather the results of others, but I do not agree. In a sense, accepting their results is to ascertain prejudice, to some extent their results are consistent with mine and that is why all of the reasons they need to get results is. This is not a way for people to seek reliable information. Given the problem of knowledge, skepticism should be considered as a means of acquiring knowledge. Here Job raised many typical questions of skeptics; why bad things happen to bad people and bad things happen to good people? This is the reason we experienced suffering Is it part of the mysterious "plan" of God? Defining our sense of justice through sacred standards we can not judge is irritating. Justice is necessary for work but I have studied many times over the past year, and our ideas are not necessarily similar to the concept of God's justice. And the church seems to always be answering the reason why this is always like: "Well, you just have to accept and just need to go." I can understand, but it is still a bit ignorant, believe this rather than choosing a deeper pressure In this article I assert that the ideal of question of tranquility is not right. I do this by suggesting that skeptics are not finding true peace and that people thinking whether things are good or bad are not always more annoying than those who are not. In this article, I disagree with the skepticism of Sextus Empiricus. In particular, he insists that tranquility is achieved by stopping judgment. But it is. The reality like life is more complicated, more subtle, and more complicated than saying good or bad. Assuming that there is no room for negotiation, investigation and innovation, we believe that we need to evolve, develop or ultimately grow this society. Society can really exist only when it has to be renegotiated, rediscovered, reconsidered and re-understood. In this way, the benefits of society are increasing, and even though it is probably not shrinking, at least not as the product grows, it is a bad thing. This is the real prosperity.

"Skepticism" refers to the theory that we do not have knowledge, skepticism denies the existence of any reasonable beliefs. In this article we discuss the diversity of philosophical skepticism and explain various skeptical arguments and reactions to philosophical skepticism as well as Hume and Descartes. In this article we will also discuss various discussions and reasons for skepticism. Although skepticism and its discussions of various forms seem to be effective and theoretically justified, my position is against skepticism. The answer - apart from the doubt of the outside world - there is no philosophical debate on the realism of tropical fish, but it is an important philosophical challenge to scientific realism. The dimension of scientific realism understood as a philosophical position depends greatly on the reaction of scientific realists to these tasks. It is conceptually useful (and historically correct) to see the development of scientific realism as a response to four consecutive issues, as follows: "Skepticism" refers to the theory that we do not have knowledge, skepticism denies the existence of any reasonable beliefs. In this article we discuss the diversity of philosophical skepticism and explain various skeptical arguments and reactions to philosophical skepticism as well as Hume and Descartes. In this article we will also discuss various discussions and reasons for skepticism. Although skepticism and its discussions of various forms seem to be effective and theoretically justified, my position is against skepticism. It is easy to challenge the demands of knowledge by explicitly asking "How do you know", but this is not enough to prove that skepticism is an important position. Like other philosophical positions, skepticism must be supported by discussion. There are many arguments for defending skepticism and many answers have been provided for these discussions. Here we consider the two most prominent arguments that support skepticism about the outside world. In his first meditation, Rene Descartes proposed a debate that supported skepticism, then he tried to counter the later meditation. Discussion points out that some of our views are inaccurate. Our senses can deceive us; we sometimes mistake our dreams as calm experiences, the devils systematically deceive us.

Skeptics are expressed as "people who ask questions of knowledge claims, need definite definitions, logical consistency, and sufficient evidence". To appreciate this approach, it is worth investigating ways in which ethics and humanities require evidence and experience to examine knowledge. By determining clear ways to gain a clear understanding of specific matters by obtaining clear evidence and experience and judging the validity of our ethical principles, our judgment in the decision making process We will draw conclusions about the validity of. . Skepticism is a wonderful tool that can help you understand the world. It is truly the foundation of their incredible discovery, giving you insights into the diligence and dedication of scientists for their work. Skeptics are usually the biggest friend of scientists. It is to disseminate scientific knowledge and counter against pseudoscience. The skeptics group cooperates with scientists to eliminate bad science and has a proud tradition of converting what scientists and experts say to accessible information. It is clear what skepticism is - I outlined many of these examples in previous articles. Even if not so important, it is equally important to understand what skepticism is, or should it be. Let's regard the practice of skepticism as "moral skepticism" - a more rigorous definition of spirituality supported by ethical skeptics - a catalog of many people, including observing myself as a skeptic person People who arrived lenient time to spend. Although we are ourselves, we do not have the foundation of ability, experience, training, knowledge that is eloquently expressed as TES. Not only because I found his website the most comprehensive and up-to-date information I have seen so far, but his motivation to create resources for his public is Because it comes from an altruistic place. It is certainly expressed in sentences One thing that I am passionate about is building an organization where culture is defined by work. When I introduced this idea, I had some doubts. I understand this skepticism. Because I am leading the team to an unknown area. About me, the way we work with Infor and its customers, and the value we add. Even with these uncertainties, here is why I believe that concentrating on work is the right way to define and build culture. Why is this so important? Even if things change - market demand, workflow, even team composition - there is no need for a change in culture. When work is culture and culture is work, there is no question as to what is important, how team members are contributing, and what is succeeding. You will know what happens to you and your colleagues, and what you expect.

"The best people in the world": Skepticism by King Lear "For the arrogant boys, we are" gods "and they killed us for their movement. (4.1.41-42) The disappointing number of Gloucester and Lear King complained, but it is interesting whether his argument should be rewarded, but far beyond the scope of this article. These and other skeptical ideas I claim that King Lear strongly advocates a skeptical worldview not only in the belief in the theology but also in every field. "Lear King" is one of Shakespeare's plays, you may have seen it many times. There are "Macbeth" and "Hamlet". It is a symbolic moment when King Lia loves musicians and audiences. There may be a great moment in the King, Storm, Gloucester blind, sister's death, and the daughter's dead king's show, but the main reason that it was the main reason for many drama seasons It is the role of that starring. King Lear is a lifelong character, and in this Royal Shakespeare Company's creation, Anthony Schell performed symbolic performance. He accepted all power, madness, and anxiety, and led the whole theater roar. Shell's stage performance is unprecedented, regardless of whether he screams on platforms or with small balls, he is very attractive. A program viewer is in his hands. The Importance of King Lyle's Fool Since the end of the 17th century, producers of King Lear have removed fools from King Lear's work. He did not come back until 1838. Therefore, producers dramatically reduced King Lear and Lear. People should notice the importance of drama's early fool. In scene 4, Leah asked a fool twice. The second time is after the first few lines. It seems that he desperately needs a fool. To further prove his selfish behavior, it is obvious that his only wealth was Sir Toby and Sir Andrew, he wanted to marry for the same reasons as Olivia.

How much can you influence this world before he or she turns 30? Most people have never actually had a real impact on the world. Also in the twenties the impact will be even less, but British playwright Christopher Marlowe in the 16th century is few. Alone. In his writings Marlow guided the audience and put them in the known world when they do not believe in God and placed them between blasphemy and heroism. Marlow teaches the details of Dr. Faustas, a celebrity who views the magic as a tool for wealth, strength, and worship to the audience. In theology, the heaven of God, or simply God, is divine intervention into the universe. The word Divine Providence (usually capital letters) is also used as the title of God. Usually, we distinguish between "general will" and "special will", "normal will" refers to God's continued support for the existence of the universe and the order of nature, and "special will" It refers to God's special intervention in people's lives. . Miracles are usually categorized in the latter category. Hippos Augustine is perhaps best known for its relationship with the Western doctrine in Latin America. Augustine believes that this implies continued control and unified governance of the highest existence, as governance of God occurs in the universe, which includes a relatively large number of relatively independent individuals whose natures, functions and consequences differ . The story of divine intervention exists from thousands of years ago and is the most obvious in the Exodus of the Bible. Over the years a number of explanations have been provided on how nature's events explain these sacred interventions, such as the separation of the Red Sea. It was easy to explain the events that happened thousands of years ago, as the human beings at the time had little or no concept of modern technology. Modern science ignores most of what it does not understand, so there is a surprising amount of things that can not be explained today to our world. From the sightings and encounters of UFO / UAP to supernatural ghosts and devil's possessions of unknown cause, modern science has little explanable explanation about these events. I recently watched the Internet memo, but it is still getting cold. "We all had fun of Catholics until we needed a payout." Thanks to sacred intervention (a professor I admire, a pioneer of the first IT degree program in this country), I gone forever for my skepticism anyway, so I accepted it in this reputable accounting the next morning . Interview with the company Since I am the only student who graduated from semester earlier than I expected, this has played an important role in the above opportunities. At the beginning of New Year, I moved to New York and started my career as an IT consultant or a sophisticated financial world for IT consultants. I have entered the field of industry experts, knowledgeable experts whose feet and thoughts are confined to the side of the bridge. No one will dare to cross the dark side. Except me

Skepticism is concerned with people 's belief if this person can really trust their own senses. As the creator of Plato, Descartes, Matrix, there is no evidence that the five senses of humans have not changed, so the possibilities of human beings deceiving are expressed in their writings and movies. I am thinking all the senses. There is no evidence that the whole world is genuine, but people have to trust their feelings to believe it. However, these senses of sight, smell, sound, etc. may be deceived. Please compare the fable of Plato's cave with the movie 'Matrix'. The fable of the cave is one of the most famous works of Greek philosopher Plato. This fable is a human extension that is portrayed as a visual through their only body and things. In the fable allegory, Plato wants to show that reality reality is not necessarily the case. From childhood, a group of prisoners was locked in the cave, each prisoner is tying head together ...... Fable analysis of Plato's cave in Plato's cave in the cave, readers are clever A metaphor is set up. Some people think that it has nothing to do with today's society. However, the prisoners trapped in this cave today represent Americans in our country. In our lives, sometimes we can face the walls of his own cave completely, forgetting the truth of our country and the world around us. TOK essay cave and queue fable On December 3, 2010, many people thought that what we knew was not true. This idea became clear through the story of "Cave Fables" and the movie "Matrix". The movie and the story are similar (Matrix is ​​said to be based on The Allegory), you can compare the major plots of both. In the cave fable, people were bound to the legs and neck in the cave, facing the walls. Fable of the cave from ~ In his book 'Republic' in February 2013 Plato tried to explain justice through different conversations with Socrates and other people. He explained how to live a fair life, what kind of fair society should be, and how to take leadership only. One of the arguments he used to explain justice is the four phases of philosophy education. He portrayed them through dialogue between Socrates and Glaucon at dinner.

J. K. Rowling's "Harry Potter" series has become one of the world's most popular children's collections in the past decade. Through these books, children and young people delved into a world full of illusions exploring the problems faced by their main character Harry Potter. In "Harry Potter and Half - Blood Prince" (6th in the Harry Potter series), Harry proved to friends and professors that Draco Malfoy and Severus Snape are no longer worth. Challenge to trust This summer, at the literary festival and bookstores around the world, readers celebrated the 20th anniversary of J. K.'s first book. Harry Potter series of rolling - Harry Potter and the philosopher's stone (renamed Harry Potter and the American Magician's Stone) - and that has a good reason. Since the young wizard began his debut on June 26, 1997, the "boy of life" has become "a symbol of tolerance". Over the past two decades, the Harry Potter series has expanded to include seven novels, totaling 450 million, including translating into more than 60 languages. The box office revenue for the eight movies in this book is $ 7 billion, of which $ 1 billion earns with Harry Potter themed toys and merchandise. It is difficult for those who have a certain age and literary spirit to remember the day when Rolling created the world without sticking to the audience. Today JK Rowling is the surname of the beloved Harry Potter book fan, but she does not always have magical talent. The truth is that J. K Rowling has reached the end before her witch and witch gang saves her. J. K before the bestseller casts a spell to the reader. Rolling depends on the welfare to live and we try to become a single mother. If you do not abandon Steve Jobs, you really can not become a self-respecting list of "famous entrepreneurs". After graduating from Jobs University, he declined because his family could not afford the economic burden of education. He informally continued the audit program, dined freely from the local Hare Krishna Temple, and returned and replaced the Coca Cola bottle. Jobs attributed his calligraphy class to his inspiration for Mac's revolutionary font and letterpress printing.

Response to GREGORY E. MAGGS 'Slovakism' proposal for modernization manual - Maldiv's rule making process Careful doubt about the benefits of adding a further procedure to trial - military rule making procedures: Answers to Captain Kevin J. Barry Response to Captain Gregory E. Maggs' "Cautious Skeptics", Modern Court Handbook - Recommendations on Military Rule Establishment Procedures The boundary between policies and customs: Prosecutor vs. Tadic and the conventional international internal armed dispute law Lincoln man: How President Lincoln became the father of the army, Major J. Bradley Major 211 Cain of roar: Lieutenant commander R. A. Review of legal rights of animals against Conrad This tension is settled by the rules of the military court handbook. The Handbook is an enforcement order to strengthen harmonized military judicial standards by establishing procedural rules and providing guidelines based on the interpretation of the case law. Section 916 (d) of the Armed Court Manual states that: Calley is convicted under this rule. The court does not recognize that it is illegal to "kill Civilians who are the most ignorant or wise in the US military" or "to kill self-defense clearly" There is no doubt. The court pointed out, "The laws of the United States have become a fixed rule for 100 years, it is murder to simply kill the submitted enemies even in the war ...". Code.mil has released the first open source project eMCM. This is a web-based Courts-Martial manual (MCM) viewer. MCM is the official guide on US military court actions. The current process of updating the MCM is very manual and cumbersome, it can take many hours to find misspellings and inconsistencies by repeatedly crossing between various military organizations. MCM is re-released every few years, so many older manuals are distributed. We chose to use the Affero General Public License (AGPL) for eMCM. Because members of each army have the right to know how eMCM transforms or manipulates the original legal code (ie MCM). Applying AGPL is a small but important method that helps the general public to ensure process freedom and transparency. Since eMCM is still in beta, we are waiting for suggestions from viewers.

Descartes 'discussion on separable works quotes the missing traitor, Descartes' argument about dualism, that his contemplation of the first philosophy summarizes his ideological theory and its theory, the history of Western thought Pioneering work at the world Relationship with other regions The main argument through meditation raised his universal doubt method through his famous Cogito, and dualism, evidence of God and the world about it. Descartes dualism is one of the most influential thoughts born from work; however, the style of meditation is a personal reflection that allows Descartes to follow the flow of consciousness and discuss slight tangents. Descartes skepticism - Descartes skepticism - Descartes skepticism - Descartes skepticism - Descartes skepticism - Descartes skepticism - Descartes skepticism - Descartes skeptical argument - Descartes skeptical argument - Descartes Skeptical argument - Descartes skeptical argument - Descartes skeptical argument - Descartes skeptical argument In this article, I will study René Descartes' suspicion and reaction to Britain. Bouwsma and Norman Malcolm Bouwsma and Malcolm argued against criticism of certain parts of Descartes' claim, but I will prove that this is not enough to refute the whole. In order to understand Descartes' argument and sometimes radical view, we need at least a general understanding of the motivation for discussion. The 17th century was an era of advancement of science, the prosperous scientific community was interested in establishing consistent standards to define what science is. Their science is based on a combination of experience and experience, and ideally there is no prejudice to contaminate the results. However, Descartes believes that the sensation is unreliable and science based only on sensory information is uncertain.

Descartes doubts experiments and mathematical abstracts: Descartes considers mathematical propositions to be doubtful. Because he believes that all beliefs are derived from perception and examples of questions about the existence of substances. The problem is not to "calculate the actual object or the sky image", but it means "to calculate the amount". Given Descartes' early works, it is possible to see the proposition 2 + against him. 3 = 5 'And' I think so, so I '', this argument is equal Descartes, Hume and skeptical Descartes are in charge of skepticism known as Descartes. Hume criticized this skepticism in his "investigation on human understanding." After discussing Descartes' suspicion, he proposed another type of skepticism that he thought he was more philosophically effective. Hume correctly explains Descartes' suspicion, is his skepticism better? Descartes introduced general skepticism to philosophy. If we believe that what is regarded as "knowledge" must be accepted as information and justified in order to be accepted. Skepticism doubts the verification of knowledge and I doubt how it came to such a conclusion. This is the main problem of skepticism Before deeply living, we need to define the term Descartes skepticism and Cartesian logic. Descartes's skepticism and doubt are derived from Descartes' Descartes and the point of skeptical debate is that we can not know the empirical allegation (Apple etc.) because there is a possibility that we might be deceived is. It has existed in the world for many years and is known by history and colonial companies. Even today, the problem is a form of racial and biopolitical problems in our world. Colonization and colonization and the concept of the difference between the two (another person is human and the other is partial) At first glance, this looks like a clearly defined question. To speak frankly, we can only judge the first person's experience. Cartesian skepticism, fully proposed by Descartes, is remarkably related to perceptual people simulated in the virtual environment. The person performing the simulation is basically a Descartes devil. If you feel that you may be simulating, the only thing you can not suspect is your subjective first person's experience. I want to know what Descartes meant when I talked about his important introduction. As background, I discovered an important part of the Cartesian heritage; Descartes doubts - casts doubt on everything you know. In today's world, this idea seems to be very old-fashioned. We tend to question everything within the scope of skepticism. For Descartes, doubt is the opposite of reason. Descartes' suspicion has made scientific progress possible over the past 200 years. The medieval society believed that humans existed because God wants them to exist. Descartes does not doubt the existence of God, I doubt that the existence of man is God's desire. He has a problem because he proved the existence of God using a series of theorems. He proved that thought is the essence of thinking

In the mid 1940's, "from the French ethics" (14c), and "from the Latin ethics" "good or bad" (good or bad), "someone's appropriate behavior in society" literally "etiquette It is related to ". Translation cause from Latin Moss (gender Morris) to "Personality", plural form, "custom, custom, moral" of "Greek" (ethics reference) from Cicero ("De Fato", "II.i) It is unknown. Maybe share English emotion and PIE's roots (1) It means "moral good according to moral rules", initially recorded at the end of 14c. Stories, people of the 1630s. Neutral consciousness to original value is held in moral support, moral victory ("sense compared to personality versus physical behavior"). Related: Morality It is worth noting that moral relativism, moral skepticism and moral expertise are logically independent of each other. For example, moral relativists are also moral genericists but not moral skeptics (such as cultural relativists like the ale sociologist William Graham Sumner of the early 20th century); moral skeptics are He is not a moral expert. (For Nietzsche, McKee and Richard Joyce they are providing "erroneous theories" to build so-called absolute universal objective moral principles); some of the special supporters Moral questionable commentator (eg his view of contemporary new Aristotle like Ross, "practical responsibility" or "proper job", Jonathan Dancy), not ethical, moral realism, Reasonable human condition 4, Kant ethics and human existence: moral philosophy research - Section 1.2, EKE and moral relativism, moral skepticism and moral specialism Moral skepticism (or moral skepticism) is a sort of meta-alien theory that all members believe that no member has moral knowledge. Many moral skeptics also propose claims of stronger aspects than moral knowledge is impossible. Moral skepticism is contrary to the existence of moral realism, especially the identifiable and objective moral truth. Michael Ruth, Joshua Green, Richard Garner, Richard Garner, Walter Sinotto Armstrong (1977), Max Stillner, Friedrich Nietzsche, Richard Joyce (2001), Pierlin, Inceidemos, Dexter Dempse, David Hume, JL Mackie (Some moral skeptical views of including defense, 2006b) and psychologist James Flynn. Strictly speaking, Gilbert Harman (1975) believes in supporting moral relativism rather than moral skepticism. However, he influenced several modern moral skeptics

Skeptical arguments and reactions to Descartes 'Bouwsma and Malcolm In this article, I will study René Descartes' skeleton and its reaction to O.K. Bouwsma and Norman Malcolm Bouwsma and Malcolm argued against criticism of certain parts of Descartes' claim, but I will prove that this is not enough to refute the whole. In order to understand Descartes' argument and sometimes radical view, we need at least a general understanding of the motivation for discussion. Descartes' idea sometimes seems radical or extreme, and his argument has been challenged many times. The two special criticisms we discussed were UK 's Descartes evil genius. Norman Malcolm has regained knowledge with Bouwsma. I would like to study the point of their criticism and then why I would like to discuss what each discussion seems to be harmful but insufficient to refute the discussion of Descartes. The criticism of Bouwsma focuses on Descartes' idea of ​​creating a bad genius in a fantastic world. His purpose is to prove that Descartes' fantasies and fraud are misleading. First, Bouwsma defined 'fantasies' and began to show how they were discovered. To achieve this goal, he raised an example of an evil genius who turned the world and everything into paper. In this article, I will study René Descartes' suspicion and reaction to Britain. Bouwsma and Norman Malcolm Bouwsma and Malcolm argued against criticism of certain parts of Descartes' claim, but I will prove that this is not enough to refute the whole. In order to understand Descartes' argument and sometimes radical view, we need at least a general understanding of the motivation for discussion. The 17th century was an era of advancement of science, the prosperous scientific community was interested in establishing consistent standards to define what science is. Their science is based on a combination of experience and experience, and ideally there is no prejudice to contaminate the results. However, Descartes believes that the sensation is unreliable, and that science based only on sensory information is uncertain. Descartes skepticism - Descartes skepticism - Descartes skepticism - Descartes skepticism - Descartes skepticism - Descartes skepticism - Descartes skepticism - Descartes skeptical argument - Descartes skeptical argument - Descartes Skeptical argument - Descartes skeptical argument - Descartes skeptical argument - Descartes skeptical argument

This content is available through online browsing (free) program dependent on page scan. Screen readers can not currently scan, so please contact JSTOR user support for access. We will provide PDF copy of your screen reader Tattersall defends evidence-based arguments based on the possibility of unfounded malicious existence. This discussion contains the premise that obvious evil is theoretically incompatible with the God of Theists. However, this argument is obvious as it is unknown whether unpaid evil exists. Therefore, another premise of Tattersall 's claim is that there may be obvious evil. Objections against various arguments against this argument have been rebutted. In this article, Ryan Stringer criticized the reaction to evil atheism, known as "skepticism." He first developed a simple atheistic argument from evil and then simply proved its two premises. Then he defended the potential reaction to skeptics. First, he argues that skepticism is inherently unbelievable and brings about results and indirectly defends his view as an unfair correspondence. If skepticism is true, it seems to weaken the main argument of atheism, debate from evil. This is to provide reasons why doubt to theology doubts the important premise in the argument of evil, that is to say that at least some evil is an unpaid precondition in our world. If we can not judge whether there is reason to allow certain evil events for God, we can not judge whether evil in our world has not been paid. If we can not tell if the evil is free of charge in our world we can not rely on the existence of unjust evil to reach the conclusion that God does not exist. The remainder of this article explains skepticism in more detail, applies it to evil claims, and examines the reasons for opposition and opposition to skepticism

Outline of scientific rational recognition theory in Europe: If the 17th century can be regarded as the century of scientific reform, this century is one of anti-reform in every sense. The ideology of this century can be seen in tremendous efforts to build the foundations of the 17th and 18th centuries, totally failed, and to complete the scientific development that attempted to rebuild the foundation (eg: Hilbert 's official program, Gödel). Incompleteness) theorem, Charlie's hierarchical cosmology theory, Friedman's evolution cosmology, Newtonian dynamics, quantum mechanics in relativity and / or physics, logical steering Discussion of colonialism and science has two different views. One is the scientific epistemology and its origins. As a physicist, I was taught that physics began with Greeks, and later Europeans inherited their thoughts and extended them. In this story, African people and other people are relatively beginners in science, the problem of inclusiveness and diversity of science is "science to underestimated minorities and color groups It is related to bringing in. The problem with this story is that it is not true. For example, many "Greeks" are actually Egyptians and Mesopotamians under Greek rule. Thus, although science has been developed mainly by Europeans in the past 500 years, the roots of its methodology and epistemology are not European. Scientists understand that science is not fundamentally the origin of Europe. The concept of evidence is extremely important to epistemology and philosophy of science. In epistemology, evidence is often thought to be related to legitimate beliefs, which in turn is considered necessary for knowledge. Understanding the evidence is extremely important in order to understand the two main purposes of epistemological concern, namely knowledge and legitimate beliefs. In philosophy of science, evidence is believed to be evidence to prove or refute scientific theory, thus constituting the rationale for us to reasonably judge the possibility of competition in the world. From this point of view, understanding the evidence is essential for understanding the normal behavior of scientific causes. Scientific skepticism or reasonable skepticism (also known as skepticism) is also called a skeptical inquiry, a practical epistemological position that doubts the credibility of assertions lacking empirical evidence is. In fact, this term is most often used to examine arguments and theories that seem to be beyond mainstream science, not regular discussions or tasks by scientists. Scientific skepticism is different from philosophical skepticism which doubts human ability to the essence of the world and how they perceive all the knowledge of the world. Methodological skepticism is a systematic process of skepticism about the credibility of human beliefs, but it is similar, but clear. The new skepticism described by Paul Kurtz is scientific skepticism. For example, Robert K. Merton claims that all ideas need to be tested and subject to a strict and organized community review (as described in the Merton Code).

A new Kindle e-book, a skeptical skeptic: an essay selected from the website, including contributions from SPR members. Contributors of Skeptical About Skeptics are Robert McLuhan, Dean Laden, Rupert Sheldrake, Graham Nichols, Guy Lyon Play Fair, Nancy Ginelone, Ted Darth, Daniel Dracin and Alex Tzakilis. Available through Amazon UK: https: //www.amazon.co.uk/Skeptical-About-Skeptics-Selection-Website-ebook/d01/B01MUI0SIQ/ref=sr_1_1? S = books & ie = UTF8 & qid = 1487149251 & sr = 1-1 & keywords + Skeptics = + skepticism A limited number of volumes will try to cover all skeptical traditions. In Landesman and Meeks 2003, Burnyeat 1983 is a series of influential papers that evoked interest in the recent skeptical history. Sinnot-Armstrong 2004 is a collection of papers related to Robert Fogglin's "New-Prusian" view, including (to some extent) a number of papers considering Foley's point of view. It is related. Greco 2008 contains a wide range of themes, including several important historical figures in the history of skepticism. The website of the International Skeptics Association is a guide to ongoing academic skepticism. International Skepticism Research Journal publishes skeptical contemporary works and academic papers on skeptical history. A new Kindle e-book, a skeptical skeptic: an essay selected from the website, including contributions from SPR members. Contributors of Skeptical About Skeptics are Robert McLuhan, Dean Laden, Rupert Sheldrake, Graham Nichols, Guy Lyon Play Fair, Nancy Ginelone, Ted Darth, Daniel Dracin and Alex Tzakilis. However, everything posted on this site is biased, or we often hear unfounded criticism that there is no doubt about artificial global warming. This is based on the misunderstanding of how skepticism is used. Basically, what these critics did is to use the various meanings and implications surrounding the words "skeptics" and "skeptics." Just because you have something suspicious is not necessarily skeptical. This sounds odd, but please tell me, there is something here. What obviously is skepticism - I outlined many of these examples in previous articles. Even though not so important it is important to understand skepticism or what it should be like. The practice of skepticism as "a moral skepticism", a more rigorous definition of spirituality supported by ethical skeptics - seeing as a generous and time-consuming catalog including myself observing skeptics Let's. The person who arrived. Although we are ourselves, we do not have the foundation of ability, experience, training, knowledge that is eloquently expressed like TES. Not only because I found his website the most comprehensive and up-to-date information I have ever seen, his motivation to create resources for his public Since it is coming from a selfless place, it is undoubtedly expressed in writing

Abstract: Dr. Gregory Boyd is a professor of theology at Bethel College. He studied at the University of Minnesota, Yale Seminary, Princeton Theological Seminary. In addition to being a professor, he is a preacher of the Woodland Hills Church in St. Paul, Minnesota, and has written three books and several articles. This special book is dialogue between him and his father, Edward Boyd. Edward lives in Florida and has been involved in sales management for 35 years. He has six children, 15 grandchildren and 9 grandchildren. In 2014, the allegation investigation committee issued letters from 52 skeptics to support the scientific agreement and asked the media not to call denialists "skeptics". "As a skeptical scientist, we are aware of the political effort to weaken climate science, which we believe rejects reality but does not participate in scientific research, or that their deep perspective is wrong proof The most appropriate word to explain the behavior of these people is "denial". Everyone who claims to be a skeptic of climate change is not a deny, but almost all deniers mistakenly suspect themselves. The reporter said the reporter gave excessive reliability. People who refused to explore science and science " Scientific skepticism or reasonable skepticism (also known as skepticism) is also called a skeptical inquiry, a practical epistemological position that doubts the credibility of assertions lacking empirical evidence is. In fact, this term is most often used to examine arguments and theories that seem to be beyond mainstream science, not regular discussions or tasks by scientists. Scientific skepticism is different from philosophical skepticism which doubts human ability to the essence of the world and how they perceive all the knowledge of the world. Methodological skepticism is a systematic process of skepticism about the credibility of human beliefs, but it is similar, but clear. The new skepticism described by Paul Kurtz is scientific skepticism. For example, Robert K. Merton claims that all ideas need to be tested and subject to a strict and organized community review (as described in the Merton Code).

Edgar Malroy will be regarded as the hero of the reader of Skepticism Inc. Edgar receives money from a wealthy church and hands it to the poor. This Robin Hood image makes Edgar various champions. And the reader will eventually protect him through the story. On the surface, the means to take Edgar's money is legal. However, bets never win, and better emotions will affect their ability to make decisions. If there is no clear result, a person can accept a bet by betting on conscience. Before we begin talking about it, this means that we first let you define the history of skepticism and skepticism. Skepticism is a position that philosophers can take and is a measure of doubt to avoid the ultimate truth. Skepticism and Pyronik skepticism are ideas conceived by Ellis Pillow in about 330 B.C. Michael Phillips Professor of Philosophy at Portland State University points out that there is a need to doubt the existence of tangible objects such as food in an article that "skepticism is ridiculous." Basically it is hypocritical to use doubts on something's reality. The biggest skeptics like history such as David Hume, Descartes and Bertrand Russell are puzzled by this funny puzzle. Some philosophers argue that it is possible to accept the tangible world, but they continue to cast doubt on the moral and theoretical parts of life. This question makes us face fundamental skepticism. I will also explain the possibility that it is not very radical but potentially hindered, and the skepticism that is not so skeptical yet. Is there any knowledge of the physical world? Is there scientific knowledge? Is there any knowledge about moral truth? Do not you know the future? It is like this. Let's look at one of them now. This is one of the most famous non-radical skeptics in the world of philosophy - I doubt the knowledge of the outside world. (This is skeptical, in order to deny what most people are accepting, skeptical denial in this sense is amazing.)

Early in the 17th century, a philosopher called Descartes questioned his existence. His life was devoted to the establishment of philosophical and mathematical systems where all science is logical. Descartes was born in 1596 in Touraine, France. His education involved attending the Jesuit school La Fleche. He studied the curriculum of liberal arts that emphasized philosophy, humanities, mathematics, and mathematics. After that, I entered Poitiers University and I got a Bachelor of Law from 1616. Descartes skepticism - Descartes skepticism - Descartes skepticism - Descartes skepticism - Descartes skepticism - Descartes skepticism - Descartes skepticism - Descartes skeptical argument - Descartes skeptical argument - Descartes Skeptical argument - Descartes skeptical argument - Descartes skeptical argument - Descartes skeptical argument Descartes was skeptical at the first two mediation. Descartes first solves radical skepticism implied by an evil devilish argument by deciding that he is intellectual essence. According to Descartes, this "I" self-view is born, we are born, even a demon can not be doubted. In this article, I will study René Descartes' suspicion and reaction to Britain. Bouwsma and Norman Malcolm Bouwsma and Malcolm argued against criticism of certain parts of Descartes' claim, but I will prove that this is not enough to refute the whole. In order to understand Descartes' claim and its extreme view, at least a general understanding of the motive for discussion is necessary. The 17th century was an era of advancement of science, the prosperous scientific community was interested in establishing consistent standards to define what science is. Their science is based on a combination of experience and experience, and ideally there is no prejudice to contaminate the results. However, Descartes believes that the sensation is unreliable and science based only on sensory information is uncertain.

The importance of philosophy in the modern world Many of the philosophers we read in class are desperate for me (some of them express helpful ideas and provide good ideas). Of course it is easy to write only when people live and philosophy has to rely on historical conditions and the range of human knowledge. Many philosophers who have existed for centuries must worry about opposition, censorship or punishment by the government, the church or society. Summary of Skepticism and Philosophy of Language in Early Modern Thought: This paper discusses the importance of skeptical discussion of language philosophy in early modern thought. It compares the concept of language and knowledge of rationalists with the concept of philosophers taking a skeptical position. Criticism of rationalists' action against natural light ... In "skepticism of skepticism's argument" and "skepticism of opposition", "Jonathan Vogel established the best explanation" reasoning (hereinafter referred to as "IBE") Serve as a means of denying doubts about the outside world. In this refutation, Mr. Vogel acknowledges that the question about IBE still exists, but this doubt is negligible because it is quite eccentric in nature. Discussion of the method is one of the most influential work in the history of modern philosophy and is very important for the development of natural science. In this work, Descartes solved the problem of skepticism studied previously by Sextus Empiricus, Al-Ghazali and Michel de Montaigne. Descartes fixed it to show that he found an undisputable truth. Descartes started his reasoning from evaluating the world from a new perspective and doubting everything to eliminate prejudice.

Descartes ignored everything he thought was true. He believes that if any belief is suspected, it is uncertain and can not be used as a basis. Descartes will refuse information, knowledge or truth based on my feeling. He applied, "Dream assertion" (19), he said, according to the senses themselves, there is no clear way to prove whether you are dreaming or awake. Therefore, sensual truths are unreliable and dubious. Descartes saw why and how his sense was deceived. Descartes skepticism - Descartes skepticism - Descartes skepticism - Descartes skepticism - Descartes skepticism - Descartes skepticism - Descartes skepticism - Descartes skeptical argument - Descartes skeptical argument - Descartes Skeptical argument - Descartes skeptical argument - Descartes skeptical argument - Descartes skeptical argument Descartes was skeptical at the first two mediation. Descartes first solves radical skepticism implied by an evil devilish argument by deciding that he is intellectual essence. According to Descartes, this "I" self-view is born, we are born, even a demon can not be doubted. In this article, I will study René Descartes' suspicion and reaction to Britain. Bouwsma and Norman Malcolm Bouwsma and Malcolm argued against criticism of certain parts of Descartes' claim, but I will prove that this is not enough to refute the whole. In order to understand Descartes' claim and its extreme view, at least a general understanding of the motive for discussion is necessary. The 17th century was an era of advancement of science, the prosperous scientific community was interested in establishing consistent standards to define what science is. Their science is based on a combination of experience and experience, and ideally there is no prejudice to contaminate the results. However, Descartes believes that the sensation is unreliable and science based only on sensory information is uncertain. French philosopher of the seventeenth century - mathematician René Descartes is a major advocate of the doctrine of natural thought. Descartes and representatives of other continental rationalism highlighted the superiority of God's innate concept of being put on human thought at birth. In addition to mathematical principles and simple ideas, Descartes' main inner thought is God's idea, and this idea can not be derived from experience. Descartes theory believes that the knowledge of God was born to everyone and is the product of faith. There are major differences between individuals and humans due to cultural, linguistic and age-specific influences, but natural thinking is thought to be a more fundamental aspect of human perception.

Topics of open and closed topics have evoked my curiosity over the past few years. This topic was discussed in the meantime with a lot of people. I have heard various opinions, but some people insist on God's omniscience and future knowledge, and other ideas to present persuasive arguments for free will. However, most people are in the third category, our brain can not understand God's work and I am satisfied to wait for an answer until they can ask them when they arrive in Heaven is. Skepticism is a combination of two arguments. The first argument of skepticism is that "theology" is roughly a view of the existence of God and "God" is a title representing completeness, theology is true. It is presumed that this is explained in some theological forms of Judaism classical Western theology, Christianity, Islam, and Oriental religion. The second argument is that some form of skepticism is correct, and this skepticism applies to the human ability to judge everything God does or in circumstances given. Not all advocates are skeptics, and not all philosophers who support skeptical skepticism are advocates. As it is the most suspicious component, it will be the focus below. Like other forms of skepticism, there are critics in skepticism as well. Some of these critics claim that skepticism adversely affects important issues of theology (God's knowledge, relations with God, etc.). Other critics believe that skeptical theology adversely affects more common problems such as everyday knowledge and moral life. Opposing opinions on skepticism can be roughly divided into five types. One of the critical criticisms of skepticism is that it eliminates the possibility of a close relationship between humans and God. This is implemented in two ways. First, if skepticism weakens the assertion on the existence of God by emphasizing the fact that he knows little about how God acts, then by the inference of reasoning, it also argues against the existence of God It will weaken.

In this article we will examine philosophical issues raised in the movie 'Matrix'. It gradually introduces how film problems are directly related to skepticism and physical and mental problems and furthermore how these problems resemble the concepts proposed by Descartes and Plato's philosophy I will explain. That is because many of the questions posed in the movies are a metaphor of the concepts in the work of each philosopher and why these concepts are important to the way they are presented in the movie Let's see. Please refer to Aristotle and Aristotleism, René Descartes and Descartesism, Epicurean and Epicureanism, Religiousism about biographies of the main philosopher of the West and related movement. Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel and Hegelianism, Immanuel Kant and Kantism, Karl Marx and Marxism, Plato and Platonism, Pythagoras and Pythagoreanism. To cover a specific field of Western philosophy, see Aesthetics, Epistemology, Ethics, Thought, Logic, Metaphysics, Biological Philosophy, Educational Philosophy, History Philosophy, Legal Philosophy, Mathematics Philosophy, Mathematics Philosophy. Philosophy Philosophy, Religious Philosophy, Science Philosophy In this article we will examine philosophical issues raised in the movie 'Matrix'. It gradually introduces how film problems are directly related to skepticism and physical and mental problems and furthermore how these problems resemble the concepts proposed by Descartes and Plato's philosophy I will explain. - During the Victorian period, poets were motivated to discuss each other in the fervor of enlightenment. Romanticism and Victorian literature were initially a problem to be accepted. As a Victorian poet, Gerald Manley Hopkins attacks religious ideas by doubting the existence of God. Hopkins' sonnet reflects this problem of oppressive religion through his gorgeous poetry for educating people about the conspiracy of the changing era

What is the first: chicken or egg. David Hume has advanced through the logic of the idea behind rationality and effect. He critically analyzed the reason behind these generally accepted views. Causal relationships seem to be completely logical and common sense, but he describes our impressions and thoughts and why they are believed. The progress of Hume begins with the first conclusion about the definition of the first reason and the theory of causality. As a result, the argument about Hume's cause-and-effect traces the same path as his epistemology and these two views supplement each other, so it is impossible to accept epistemology rather than rationally The opposite of causal reductionism and causal skepticism is a new tradition of rest. It began with Norman Kemp Smith's "David Hume's Philosophy" and defended Hume as a causal realist's viewpoint. In this way we deny the causality reduction theory and causality skepticism. - Causal relationships are known in principle. (Tooley 1987: 246-47) Considering the above explanation, Humean's causal realism is least intuitive, so it needs the most explanation. However, this position can be made more reasonable by introducing three explanatory tools that seem to require proper use to persuade the realistic interpretation. Two of them argue that Hume is respected in important respects, but it is a description of a realist who claims that unrealistic interpretation is often denied. An attractive similarity between William Okamem and David Hume, such as the general view of causality. Answer: Occam Hume's David Hume William did not deny a causal relationship. He accepted it. However, he says that empirical methods can not logically prove their necessity. Because for observations "constant relationship" of events, A "conventional continuity", and Hume, causality is what human beings naturally believe. The philosophy of Immanual Kant (1724-1804), the most influential philosopher since Aristotle, is an attempt to answer the skeptical philosophy of David Hume (1711-1776). According to Hume there is no reason to believe the causal relationship; for example, just because an object seems to have a law of gravity that always causes objects of the past to fall to the ground, the object will not change at such next gravity law There is no reason to believe it to follow. Kant agreed that Hume agreed that he could not understand how something behaves in the real world or the real world. But Kant adds new wrinkles. He thinks that each person's mind builds up a subjective world and that this subjective world is the world that each of us "knows".

Between 1900 and 1914, women found a reason why they could not get the right to vote during the period from 1900 to 1914, and there was a social revolution. In the patriarchal society of the UK, women live together, there is new movement, women seek voting rights. These "new" women face many obstacles, one of which is government skepticism. After November 1911, we began to create our own obstacles by initiating violent protests by WSPU (Women's Social Political Union) who did not have voting rights. Searching why women are between 1900 and 1914 can not gain voting rights Some women who do not have voting rights between 1900 and 1914, both long and short, There are reasons. As a long-term reason, there are views that many people at the time thought that women and men had "independent areas". They believe that women belong to the private sector - responsibility for raising children, cooking, men must be involved in the public domain, politics. Henry Labouchere said: because of these roles, "I will destroy the relationship between all trials to break down the natural barriers of men and women" believed to be set by God, Between 1900 and 1914, women found a reason why they could not get the right to vote during the period from 1900 to 1914, and there was a social revolution. In the patriarchal society of the UK, women live together, there is new movement, women seek voting rights. These "new" women face many obstacles, one of which is government skepticism. After November 1911, we began to create our own obstacles by initiating violent protests by WSPU (Women's Social Political Union) who did not have voting rights. This is because women of various reasons between 1900 and 1914 could not gain the right to vote for this article between 1900 and 1914 which could not get women's voting rights I will explore. It is seeing feminist, feminist NUWSS which is the main influence of patriarchal society. , Publicity and other influences. By 1900, women have made many advances in education, legal rights and employment opportunities. But they still can not vote in the general election. Many women believe they are always second-class citizens before they gain basic rights to choose their members.

Something other than words tells ideas, places, moods etc. In the furniture of the room, affection for the passenger's color is written. Getting out of the meeting will be a statement we refuse to submit. Attention and involvement of jewelry, clothing, house decoration etc. are usually attracting attention due to its size and bold design. An account that the bank prepares for each customer, usually on a regular basis, to display all credits and debits after the last account, and the balance at the end of the period. Computer instructions written in source language such as FORTRAN and converted to one or more machine code instructions by the compiler To affirm or deny something, judge the content of a sentence that is both true and false; therefore, content that is affirmed or denied by verbal behavior. So it is very warm to say the same to my proposition (def.2b). British education is a legally binding statement of the needs of students with special educational needs and requirements to meet these needs. Control statements Statements used to change the sequential execution of statements in a programming language; control statements are either conditional statements (such as IF) or command statements (such as STOP). In JCL, a statement in a job that identifies the job or describes the requirements of that job to the operating system. A device that translates high-level requirements of controller processors to low-level requirements for I / O devices, and vice versa. Each physical controller contains one or more logical controllers, a channel and device interface, and a power supply. Controllers can be divided into segments or grouped into subsystems. The principle of duality is the same for double statement that exchanges a union for an intersection (and vice versa) for all actual statements, and a universal set to an empty set (and vice versa) . If either statement's double is the statement itself, it is called a self double statement. A sentence such as "not true" or "all truth is relative" is a self-destructive sentence. Since both descriptions are absolute truth allegations, they do not meet their own standards. If there is no truth, the word "not true" is not true and must be abandoned. The idea that "all truths are relative" also absolutely insists on "all truths" and must be abandoned. Another general statement about the truth may be something like truth but that we can not know exactly anything including such absolute truth that may exist is. But this statement is another self-destructive statement. How do you know that you know everything? Even the most faithful skeptics can not be literally skeptical about everything, because it requires that he be skeptical about skepticism. "But" As Geisler / Turek said, "The more you suspect skepticism, you will be sure."

Descartes and meditation III At the beginning of meditation III, Descartes made considerable progress in breaking skepticism. He systematically investigated all his beliefs using suspicion and analysis methods and ignored his doubt until it reached three beliefs that could not be doubted. First of all, the evil genius who tried to deceive him failed to deceive him that he did not exist and that he actually existed. Second, his essence is to think. Descartes of meditation pointed out his reasoning about the existence of God. The concept he used to prove the existence of God is that God is so unique that the ability to think about existence with infinite power and wisdom must mean existence. The idea is that not so complicated, our thoughts and common things can not produce more complicated things, and God or God is like being. This concept contradicts the fact that I can not prove the existence of God through logic. Descartes and meditation III At the beginning of meditation III, Descartes made considerable progress in breaking skepticism. He systematically investigated all his beliefs using suspicion and analysis methods and ignored his doubt until it reached three beliefs that could not be doubted. First of all, the evil genius who tried to deceive him failed to deceive him that he did not exist and that he actually existed. - About 40 years ago, Maharishi Mahesk Yogi pioneered a plan to transcend meditation. Beyond meditation, it is a natural and essential movement that relieves stress and enhances your physical and mental potential. TM (transcendental meditation) usually takes 15 to 20 minutes twice a day. Usually, some people meditate before breakfast; this practice helps people begin his day as vigilant and energetic. Discussed three meditations of Descartes. His first meditation was called "meditation I: suspicious thing". In this meditation, Descartes recalls that he was deceived by his feeling, and that it has been happening since then, and that may also happen. So he told himself that my beliefs were dangerous and uncertain if I were deceived. It is the recognition of the first meditation that is called the second meditation "meditation II: about the essence of the human mind: it is known better than the body". Descartes believes that he must be present because he is "thoughtful". He can be deceived and can possess ideas and beliefs, so he must exist. His third meditation "Meditation III: About God, He is present" believes that God exists and he rejects the idea that God was invented. He proposed three perspectives; innate, factual and accidental. Descartes believes that God is a natural idea, he is not improvised

Conspiracy theory explains the event through a secret organization that traces its cause back to the plot. Theorists believe that many important political events and social trends are due to secret plots that the general public does not understand. The conspiracy theory in the open palm can be a healthy way for people to review power. Many of what have been called conspiracy theories, such as the secret oil dollar agreement between the United States and Saudi Arabia quoted at the beginning of this article, are now known as conspiracy facts. However, unlike its cynicism about all power structure in the United States, the Russian government asserts the overthrow of the CIA as a model of lies, torture and government truth and virtue, helping to tilt the Democratic primary Cooperate with corporate loyalists. Their theory does not scrutinize power; it protected it. They intentionally did not have their conspiracy theory, but changed it to a mad, noncritical cult. As one reader says, they are comets off the heavenly gate. How conspiracy theories and conspiracy theories are based on a large amount of skepticism? In Part 3, Kelly argues about what conspiracy theory is and believes there is no reason to distinguish conscientious conspiracy theory from unfounded conspiracy theory (UCT). Introducing counterfeitability and skepticism, we extended Part III's Part III by analyzing the difficulty of UCT in more detail. In the fifth quarter, he discussed the issues raised. Freemason's conspiracy theory is a conspiracy theory involving Freemasonry, and since the late eighteenth century, such conspiracy theory has been described hundreds of. Generally, these theories are divided into three different categories. Politics (usually, especially in the United States and the United Kingdom, including government control claims), religion (usually including anti-Christian or Satan faith or custom claims) and culture (usually popular entertainment). Many conspirator writers associate Freemason (and Knights Templar Order) with devil worship; these ideas are based on different interpretations of the doctrine of these organizations.

The creation and development of alchemy is full of public ridicule and shame caused by philosophical theory, brilliance of alchemy, and failure to create legendary materials called philosopher's stone. Therefore, this stone is always one of the most popular items in Europe, the history of the driving force of alchemy. This sacred art is the first tool of Modern Chemistry (Alchemy), the pioneer of process and theory. Contemporary Americans are most likely to be introduced into American literature alchemy concepts like Shakespeare (art alchemy). The big difference in fake science makes the history of science even more complicated. Modern pseudoscience such as astrology and acupuncture began before the era of science. Others develop as part of an ideology like Lysenko, or as a response to a perceived threat of ideology. Examples of such ideological processes are creation of science and intelligent design, and they are based on scientific evolution theory. Karl Popper says that it is not enough to distinguish between science and fake science or metaphysics (philosophical issues of what it implies by strictly following the criteria of empirical methods). He suggested ways to distinguish between real, experienced and even pseudo experience methods. The latter case is based on astrology useful for observation and experiment. Many pseudo-scientific writers emphasize that pseudo-science is a non-scientific science. The most important modern classic on this subject (Gardner 1957) is entitled Fads and Fallacies under the name of science. According to Brian Baigrie (1988, 438), "Haters dislikes against these beliefs are pretending that they are truly scientific." The following two criteria (Hansson 1996): We are suitable for these two encyclopedias of science, pseudoscience, and skepticism. In 1950 I set skepticism of contemporary times. There, Gardner posted an article entitled "The Hermit Scientist" in "Antioch Review". This article is about what we call pseudoscientists today This is Gardner's first skeptical publication. It began a critical analysis of the lifetime of the edge statement, and in 1952 (under the urging of his literary agent John T. Elliott), Gardner published an article in a book titled "Science Name" It expanded. Subtitle of Length Processing Explanation "Entertainment Survey of Past and Present High Priests and Scientists" This book, published by Putnam, was reprinted by Dover in 1957, which was soon forgotten because it was sold very badly It was inactive until I had it. What attracted the attention of young Martin Gardner half a century ago?

Despite ideal and promised allegations, sovereign decisions are fundamentally driven by their own interests. The decisions of Italian Renaissance leaders, like the former Soviet Union and the United States, were due to selfish reasons just like that of ancient Athens. The so-called ideals and promises that make decisions between people's words and ideals and make decisions when they actually need to find the one that is most suitable for the interests of others are violated (and will continue). Identity politics is a cynical political leader who uses someone, a group, or thought to restore what they believe is born, promote exploitation "historical" and promote neo-liberalism It is nothing but cynical political strategy. The power of agenda, betray people who succeeded in the past. Identity politics: We divide into groups of plastics based on appropriately adjusted things that may make us feel unreasonable. The Russian door and its accompanying facility, invasion of Ukraine in Russia, Russian invasion of Syria may be beginning a fictitious process. Now is the time to try true tactics, brave houses, and red, white and blue. bar) Regarding political issues, most American voters have replaced skepticism with sarcasticism, and this exchange has greatly changed the political situation. Regardless of the evidence, there is one person who doubts that they have seen the evidence, and some cynics are doubting everything. One person challenges the idea and the other relaxes. One person is frustrated while others are doing their best. Cynical is a cheap and dangerous alternative that can be carefully considered - cheap, as it is simple and dangerous, it is hard to unlock irony depreciation. Taking a cynical attitude towards a skeptical person may affect human life; most remarkable, it directly affects human satisfaction. By expansion, this will affect politics. Table 1 shows a regression model of cynicism, indifference and skepticism. The first list of age (β = .13) and gender (β = _ 13) are important predictors of political sinism. Political ideology and traditional news sources have nothing to do with syncism. These variables combine to account for a change of 4.8%. H1a predicts that traditional internet resources with emphasis on campaign information will be associated with irony. The data supports this assumption. Traditional Internet resources with emphasis on campaign information have a relatively strong adverse effect on cynicism (β = [27]), control three population management, pay attention to traditional news sources, social media And focus on the influence of online expression. Respondents who are more concerned about traditional internet resources show lower sarcasticism

The great physicist Albert Einstein once said - I remembered that my internal and external life is based on others' life and death one hundred times, and I have to play. My own role to achieve the same strength as I am. Here, Einstein issued a deep statement - as a citizen of the earth, we created a better world for their descendants and gained countless great men and women's legacy. Therefore, Einstein suggested returning to him an extraordinary concept of moral responsibility, ie, a very society in his life. Skepticism about moral responsibility, or more often moral liability skepticism, is a series of views that seriously recognize that humans are not morally responsible for their behavior in a specific universal sense . This emotion is often distinguished by the basic desert concept and is defined as behavioral control that the agent really deserves to condemn and admire. Some ethical skeptics have completely refused the concept of this moral responsibility. Because they think that it is inconsistent or impossible. Others argue that although ours is possible, our best philosophical and scientific theory about the world provides a powerful and compelling reason to question doubts about moral responsibility. Traditional philosophical debate on moral responsibility focuses on human factors of ethical behavior. An explanation of how to condemn moral responsibility usually explains the behavior of human acts to perform with obvious and immediate results. However, in today's growing technology society, human activities can not be understood correctly without reference to technical artifacts, which complicates attribution of moral responsibility (Jonas 1984; Waelbers 2009 ). As we interact with these artifacts and pass through them, they affect the decisions we make and how they make them (Latour 1992). They will persuade, promote and support certain human cognitive processes, behaviors or attitudes while restricting others, discouraging and suppressing others. For example, Internet search engines prioritize and present information in a particular order and affect what Internet users can see. Computer technology challenges the concept of traditional moral responsibility and raises questions about how to appropriately assign responsibilities. Are humans still responsible for the complex computer technology behavior and are there any restrictions on the control or understanding of those technologies? Is it the only subject who can undertake moral responsibility, or will the concept of moral subjects be expanded to include human computing subjects? To answer these questions, philosophers reviewed the concept of ethical behavior and moral responsibility. There is no clear consensus on what these concepts should have in the increasingly digitized society, but any reflection on these concepts needs to deal with how these technologies affect human behavior It is obvious from the discussion that there is something. border

Excessive skepticism If you create everything everyone knows, the world will be a boring place, and intellectuals have nothing new to see or learn. Fortunately, God is not. People have a variety of knowledge shapes and sizes. Some people are familiar with others, others know well. Because both have the same attitude and confidence, it is impossible to know who knows who does not know who. From the previous statement, we can all conclude that we should work for a happy medium of health skepticism and cast doubt on our understanding of what needs to be questioned . In terms of culture, you will need to remove the image of London and the whole UK as fear of excessive doubts and risks. The most successful technology centers are known for adopting state-of-the-art, often destructive innovation, so there is no time to suppress or carefully. This reputation changed due to the entrepreneurial spirit of Silicon Roundabout and more financial support for startup. If London continues to do so, it should be further recognized as a true global technology center. I usually do not like to explore the research papers summarized in the deep learning program. In my opinion, it is too ambitious, so it tends to be skeptical of any outcome. So, last week, there was a lot of topic about Microsoft DeepCoder: learning to write programs, I basically ignored it. Steven Merity has an analysis article of a long article and its corresponding promotional phrase (see "DeepCoder stops stealing code from StackOverflow"). It soon became realistic and I noticed that I would not turn back. These are the wrong decisions that I do well, and I do not care enough about the plan. I am too analytic, too much to think too much, this is a rare and spiritual holiday. I account for 99.9%. It is on sale. I am very scared. This will be 7 days (please do not hurt if possible) What is the return of this gambling? As far as I can remember, the idea of ​​being told what I can not do is fuel of the fire of my life. I will make my past experience and self-criticism right now. Whenever you realize that you are behind the group of nine people, speed up to make sure you are the first or third person. In the terms of Harvard Business School, I guarantee everyone (but myself) that I won 1 point with this rise. Doubt is a passionate word. Are you skeptical? Doubting the business is not a team worker or a trouble maker but a speaker, it is like it is difficult to work together. Doubt need not be destructive or negative. You do not have to be a skeptical bastard. To be skeptical may mean treating things with respect and courtesy to lead to business needs and create thoughtful and meaningful discussions to build business solutions. Carl Sagan (November 9, 1934 - December 20, 1996) was an American astronomer, cosmologist and astrophysicist, he was known as the master of the balance between skepticism and openness. In the last book by Carl, he wrote the chapter "The Art of Baloney Detection" which outlined "Baloney Detection Kit". With the introduction of new ideas, Carl Sagan uses toolkits to rate them.

In my first philosophical thought, Descartes led the reader to practice methodology in philosophical quest. After depriving all the wisdom of false and false beliefs, he reviewed the nature and structure of existence and tried to obtain universally valid epistemology without skepticism. In hopes of a successful harmonization between science and theology, Descartes is a new and absolutely true foundation that acts as a catalyst for future scientific research through "mathematics to prove that the world can win the world" We promise to reestablish. With our intellectuals By contemplating the first philosophy, Descartes metaphysics was established. It recognizes his physics, as you can see from the analogy of his tree. In philosophical principles Descartes calculates the fundamentals of physics, and the first part is actually meditation meditation (slightly different). "Principles" are texts which greatly influence the development of modern physics. For example, Isaac Newton (1643-1727) will develop his physics as a reaction to Descartes and use the latter as his own foil. Actually, Newton's Principia (principle) may be called a tribute to Descartes' book. Therefore Descartes' physics (and his metaphysics) are thought to be incorrect, but it plays an important role in the development of modern physics. In my first philosophical thought, Descartes led the reader to practice methodology in philosophical quest. After depriving all the wisdom of false and false beliefs, he reviewed the nature and structure of existence and tried to obtain universally valid epistemology without skepticism. In hopes of a successful harmony of science and theology, Descartes promises to rebuild a new foundation for absolute and certain truth as a catalyst for future scientific research "The mathematical physics of the world It shows what can be realized through our intellectual biology. Pondering the first philosophy validates Descartes' debate about the existence of God. The purpose of this paper is to explore Descartes' inference and proof of the existence of God. In the third meditation, Descartes presented two arguments to prove the existence of God, a trademark argument and a traditional cosmological argument. His claims are powerful and relatively realistic, but they do not prove the existence of God. At the beginning of meditation, Descartes began to refuse

An example of his idea is as follows. (Chapter 11) Happiness is a continuous improvement of desire from one thing to another, acquisition of things is only a way to the next. The purpose of human desire is not to only enjoy it once but to ensure that all male voluntary actions and trends tend to acquire and guarantee a central life. The desire of praise gives people acts commendable - actions that satisfy those who seek judgment they appreciate. Thrift makes it impossible for men to succeed in action that requires the power of many men at the same time. Age of Enlightenment (or Age of Enlightenment or rationality) is an intellectual cultural movement that began in Western Europe in the second half of the 17th century, emphasized reasons and individualism, not tradition, until the end of the 18th century in Europe and America It spread inside. Its purpose is to transform society rationally, to challenge ideas based on traditional ideas and beliefs, to develop knowledge in a scientific way, promote scientific thinking, skepticism, knowledge exchange is. Many critical thinkers believed that religion and reason are hostile in the age of enlightenment in the 17th and 18th centuries. For them, the Middle Ages or the "era of faith" is therefore the opposite of the era of reason. Kant and Voltaire were attacking the Middle Ages as an era of religious decline, and gibbons in the "history of decline and decline of the Roman Empire" expressed contempt for 'dark aged garbage'. But like Petrarch, he saw himself at the cutting edge of the "new era" and criticized it for centuries before his own time, as was the enlightenment writer . After centuries of medieval religious doctrine, skepticism reappeared at the end of the Renaissance era, especially in the era of reason and in the era of the 17th and 18th centuries. French Michel de Montagne (1533 - 1592) and British Francis Bacon all had skepticism as a starting point, but they did not know anything about Blaze Pascal and Rene de Carte. Faith Montaigne especially questioned the implicit premise that the overall construction of the educational system and philosophers who received university education are smarter than uneducated farm workers. The philosophical tradition of the United States from the 17th century to the early 18th century was clearly characterized by the religious theme and the theoretical basis of Ramos' reform, but in the 18th century the 18th century was a new learning of science, the age of enlightenment, It depended more on belief in. Ethics of education and moral philosophy, economics of free abandonment, and new attention to political problems to achieve human integrity. Samuel Johnson is known as the "founder of American philosophy" and is "the first important philosopher of America in colonial times and the author of the first philosophical textbook published there." He is not only interested in philosophy and theology, but also interested in the educational theory and knowledge classification system he used to write encyclopedia, develop university courses, and create library classification system I have.

Instead, they support the view that there is no clear sign that there is a difference between disease and health, but at the most it is only a subjective feeling. Continuously, Graham's idea about realism needs to reject opinions pursuing attempts to reduce psychiatric disorders into purification and neurological problems. In order to do this, Graham has proposed two arguments on behalf of anti realism, even though they are realists, that the concept of realism and the concept of mental disorder seems to be misleading indicate. On behalf of anti-realism, it is a realist, but two arguments were proposed to show how the concept of realism and the existence of mental disorders are misleading. The first argument that Graham was representative of anti realism was metaphysical skepticism. Metaphysical skeptics question the existence of something. In this case, this means that they question the existence of mental disorders. According to Graham 's metaphysical skeptics, the mental disorder is only brain damage. There may be many reasons to publicly deny a mental disorder, but there is evidence that mental health problems are indeed general, an important consideration, and are associated with excessive human difficulties Yes. For example, according to epidemiological data, about a quarter of American adults experience mental disorders in a certain year, nearly half of whom experience mental disorders at some point in their lives. Suicide is the whole world. For its main reasons, the World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that mental disorders are one of the top 20 obstacles, especially for women and ethnic minorities, an important reason to lose years of life. Finally, as of 2010, it is estimated that the cost of global mental illness will be enormous as $ 2.5 trillion. Of course, mental health and psychiatric disorders are important considerations for understanding human condition. Mental disorders are not realistic: use of skepticism and critical thinking to challenge important myths in the mental health science

David Hume Hume, David, 1711-76, Scottish philosopher, and historian. Hume brings empiricalism of John Rock and George Berkeley to the logical extremes of fundamental skepticism. He denied the possibility of some kind of knowledge, found a series of emotions in his mind, and believed that the causal relationship in nature arises from the combination of the two kinds of impressions. David Hume was born in Edinburgh, Scotland. He first studied law at the University of Edinburgh. Hume served as secretary, librarian and embassy staff. David Hume went to France twice. He met Jean Jacques Rousseau, Diderot, d'Hollbach, Turgot, d'Alembert. When Rousseau came to England to find a job. Hume helped Rousseau find a job, and Rousseau could not stick to it for his prosecution. In addition, Hume does not allow us to apply the concept of "knowledge" to natural science. Hume distinguishes between what we call now analytical knowledge and the concept of de facto problems we currently call synthetic knowledge. Analysis, or prior knowledge and integration, posterior knowledge has the truth of two different standards David Hume Hume, David, 1711-76, Scottish philosopher, and historian. Hume brings empiricalism of John Rock and George Berkeley to the logical extremes of fundamental skepticism. He denied the possibility of certain kinds of knowledge and found a series of emotions in his mind and believed that the causal relationship in nature was entirely from B's introduction. The answer to the theme is drawn by the time committee named as illusion by David Hume, and the time committee named human by himself. In the era of modern philosophy, when the influence of Descartes was still important, David Hume brought the argument of killing the Descartes I created and skipping it like a ghost in human perception. You can see not only the theme but also the contrast between Hume and Descartes. An attractive similarity between William Okamem and David Hume, such as the general view of causality. Answer: Occam Hume's David Hume William did not deny a causal relationship. He accepted it. However, he says that empirical methods can not logically prove their necessity. For Hume, causality is what human beings naturally believe.

According to Thomas' doubt Webster, "skepticism" is a philosophical theory that acquisition of absolute knowledge is impossible. It is from Greek skeptesthai. Other remarkable skeptics are Xenophanes, Gorgias and Sextus Empiricus. Skepticism is very common in today's society and is practiced by all people in some way. 96 Pyrrho is an ancient Greek philosopher and incorporates pure skepticism into Greek p. On Sunday, we heard that "suspicious" Thomas became famous for its popular culture. I got a bad lap except Thomas. The tag problem is beyond Thomas' poor expression. This makes the allegations themselves look like a terrible thing. Thomas seems to be a loser because he wants experience with other people, that is, the resurrected Christ. Doubt is normal. I believe that God can deal with our doubts and problems. If there is doubt, I think that our entire belief system will not collapse like a house of cards. Some people object to it. If you suspect or ask a question, some missionaries will do their best to make the questioners make them feel wrong. These ministers are wrong. It is normal to ask questions and ask questions, but in a way this is a good thing. According to Jesus, when Thomas looked for Thomas, he saw the encounter between Jesus and Thomas and met Thomas instead. We often call Thomas "suspect Thomas" and describe him like "not like Thomas - not doubting, but do not believe". We certainly are like Thomas - not our doubt, but in our question to Jesus and God we are giving us some information about doubt. Or sometimes, we admire what Thomas asked me to see the resurrected Jesus - I can ask questions and need something to support us. These explanations and explanations are not necessarily wrong, but today we believe that Thomas is the one who was first touched by the disciple after being told by the resurrected Jesus. The disciples told Thomas what they had experienced with Jesus who resurrected - giving them their own testimony, Thomas asked more. What will we do as a church?

Witnesses and testimony played a major part in today's criminal justice system, but the witness's skepticism is growing. Legal evidence is used to impair the witness's testimony's credibility The main cause of false convictions in the United States is the witness's misunderstanding. The role of eyewitness testimonies in the creation of false confessions and the factor of reduced reliability of these witnesses' testimony is imprisonment of innocent people and reform these incorrect identification procedures Reform is in progress. Witness testimony as a source of reliable evidence In cognitive psychology, is the witness's testimony reliable in today's justice system? Word Count: 3944 Abstract Witness's testimony is reliable evidence in today's justice system? Many juries tend to pay close attention to witness testimony. They ignore psychology behind recalling events. Our brain is a complicated structure that is hard to absorb ... the evidence of a witness may be important to solve a crime, but as more and more cases are confirmed by DNA evidence, The problem is how confident should you be witnessing only witnesses? Various factors are involved in the accuracy and consistency of the evidence of the eyewitness testimony, such as the content of the queue, the instruction of the queue, the skill of the person in charge of the interviewer, especially the sex and age of the witness. Witnesses and testimony played a major part in today's criminal justice system, but the witness's skepticism is growing. Forensic evidence is used to compromise the credibility of witness testimony The main reason for false beliefs in the United States is the witness's misunderstanding. The study shows that the statement that the witness's testimony is reliable and accurate is verifiable and that the identity of the witness is easily distorted without the witness's perception. More specifically, it is assumed that the memory provides a precise experience record that is not accurate like a camera. The evolution of memory gives us a sense of personal identity and leads our actions. We pay attention to one experience, exaggerate, try to reduce or ignore others. Memory is plastic

Participants in the discussion on "ontology commitment" will benefit from the way to distinguish the concepts of two different understandings. If the question in question is "what is theory" or "what is theory", we are considering a "clear" commitment. When asking about the theoretical cost or the preconditions of the theoretical truth, I will search, "promised" implicitly ". I defended the concept of ontological commitment as an implicit promise and developed and defended the concept that quantitative idioms that are not explicitly promised implicitly are in natural language. Standard of ontological commitment: In what we consider to be a true (simple) sentence, we can do explanatory commitments (not explain) through singular terms and exist in a sense that they exist There is an ontological commitment in statements that are in quantifiers (existentialists), but such statements do not use predicates. Participants in the discussion on "ontology commitment" will benefit from the way to distinguish the concepts of two different understandings. If the question in question is "what is theory" or "what is theory", we are considering a "clear" commitment. When asking about the theoretical cost or the preconditions of the theoretical truth, I will search, "promised" implicitly ". I defended the concept of ontological commitment as an implicit promise; I have also developed and defended it Timmons distinguish meta ethics from normative ethics and distinguish epistemological elements of meta ethics from its semantic and ontological elements. Then he motivates his commitment to methodological and ontological naturalism and attempts to link this commitment to various meta positions (and their constituent epistemology). Zimmerman discusses various arguments of moral skepticism and various non-skepticism of morality and divides the latter into rationalism and empiricism. According to Zimmerman, people can deduce from "yes" directly "should" without the help of intuition and cognitive "seeing". An understanding of the general principles of undertaking these inferences or verifying their credibility is gained by imagination and emotion. experience

I believe that if God is truly omnipotent and omnipotent, he will be able to find ways to forgive free will while not allowing the outcome of evil. This is not necessary. Today's atheromologists are focusing on "evil of nature" such as "natural disasters that give pain to non-human animals". God, because he is omnipotent and omnisci, there are reasons to allow us. Because we can not be seen as living creatures that are omniscient and not omniscient. Must exist This is a view called "skepticism". It has many problems. Before seeing this, we need to make your claims more general. Because the free will itself is easily avoided by referring to evil of nature. Therefore, as a human being, we can not reliably judge that certain kind of evil has not been paid. That is evil that God can prevent without sacrificing equal or higher profits. Skeptical theology threatens our moral judgment. If you saw a child drowning in a shallow pond, I can easily save money for myself. At least, now, one problem is whether the death of a child is actually a versatile one. Maybe I should go. Skeptical theology threatens our own judgment. I suppose I remember its existence 10 minutes ago. If our unpaid decision can not be trusted, why can we trust our memory judgment (or judgment of recognition)? At least, defenders of principle are here in principle thanks to our differences. (Instead, skeptics should generally deny evidence of appearance at first glance, but if there is no trust on the surface, skepticism about the validity of the skepticism itself, including global skepticism Suspect of theology may be self - destructive. For some hidden reasons, God can show us that there is a superficial moral reason for revealing h 0, or at least clearly telling us that there is such a reason I can do it. You can reapply skepticism to quote the hidden reason that h1 may not reveal h0, but the advocate of theology needs hidden reasons such as h2. Even in the second experiment, I think the reasons are similar. I feel the reaction of the bowel when most people (about 99%) appear with children, but this intuitive reaction is "This is wrong." In the second experiment, I choose to obey the behavioral policy caused by my emotional reaction. This emotional response may evolve, but empathy seems to be the key to any cooperative species, and it seems to be the heart of a life worth living. In all human cultures, the "other-oriented" adage exists in some way; this is what I accept naturally and rationally. Humans are emotional creatures. Emotions are the value of our lives. Without them, there is no pleasure, love, sports, art, movies, comedy, music, friends, lovers, partners. Emotions are not just robots and machines. Therefore, the problem here is not emotions themselves, but how to interpret them and then take action. For example, in a crisis situation, "I am very frustrated with this situation, I think I must be very weak", but the more realistic idea is as follows. This shows my values ​​and important things to me, so I will use these emotions to decide what action I want to take to create what I want. " Sorrow is a human emotion that everyone feels at some point in their life. Feeling sadness is a natural reaction to situations that cause emotional confusion and pain. There are various degrees of sorrow. However, like other emotions, sorrow is temporary and disappears over time. In this way, sorrow is different from depression. When you are sad, it can sometimes feel completely inclusive. But when you can laugh or you can earn comfort, you should also have time. Depression is different from sorrow. Your mind affects every aspect of your life. It can be hard or impossible to find anything fun, including activities and people you liked in the past. Depression is a mental illness and not an emotion.

Hume's epistemology David Hume is a Scottish philosopher known for his skepticism and empiricism. Hume strives to develop John Rock 's empiricism better through scientific research on our humanity. If we do not clarify this problem, we can not rely on common sense to explain human behavior. In other words, Hume said that it is urgent to observe how humans do this because humans are actually living and working in this world. The main purpose of philosophy is to explain and justify why we believe what we are doing. The philosophy of Immanual Kant (1724-1804), the most influential philosopher since Aristotle, is an attempt to answer the skeptical philosophy of David Hume (1711-1776). According to Hume there is no reason to believe the causal relationship; for example, just because an object seems to have a law of gravity that always causes objects of the past to fall to the ground, the object will not change at such next gravity law There is no reason to believe it to follow. Kant agreed that Hume agreed that he could not understand how something behaves in the real world or the real world. But Kant adds new wrinkles. He thinks that each person's mind builds up a subjective world and that this subjective world is the world that each of us "knows". Head David Hume devoted himself to part of his philosophy and tried to ignore his mistaken argument about the soul. In Hume's doubt, the German idealist began with Emmanuel Kant and left various cognitive and metaphysical problems. David Hume is an Scottish empiricist and became a philosopher for his metaphysical skepticism and explanation of his mind. Hume was born in the 18th century The opposite of causal reductionism and causal skepticism is a new tradition of rest. It began with Norman Kemp Smith's "David Hume's Philosophy" and defended Hume as a causal realist's viewpoint. In this way we deny the causality reduction theory and causality skepticism. - Causal relationships are known in principle. (Tooley 1987: 246-47) Considering the above explanation, Humean's causal realism is least intuitive, so it needs the most explanation. However, this position can be made more reasonable by introducing three explanatory tools that seem to require proper use to persuade the realistic interpretation. Two of them argue that Hume is respected in important respects, but it is a description of a realist who claims that unrealistic interpretation is often denied.

The natural way and the white natural method adopted by Descartes, RenéDescartes, is quite different from the way of Gilbert White. Descartes and White have similar important ways to test nature. Descartes' deductive inference and belief mainly leads to nature approaching in his mind (body and mind). Descartes combines mathematics and logic with philosophy to explain the material world and when it becomes a theological problem it becomes metaphysical and meditates on the nature of existence and the binary nature of the mind and body and the body of the pineal gland I will decide my soul. It is a contact. This also urged to define the concept of dualism. That is to satisfy the problem of non-importance. This concept caused controversy as his previous philosophical system gave the people tools to define real knowledge. Fortunately, because Descartes himself produced a methodological skepticism, ie a Descartes doubt, all our philosophers Descartes' discussion is an epistemological argument. It casts doubt on the nature, limitations and validity of human knowledge. Descartes is not exploring the essence of reality, but doubts his own knowledge and interpretation of reality. Using methodological skepticism, Descartes doubts whatever may be suspected to lay the foundation for true knowledge. In epistemology, most of the knowledge we got is enough to explain the world, but there is no "absolute" truth. Several important issues raised by Descartes are still controversial in knowledge theory. The first question is whether to deny skepticism, and how to argue. No one has used Descartes again, but other strategies have advanced. A related question is whether there are any reasons for trying to argue against skepticism or even trying. One of the most important moves that Descartes did was trying to use the internal resources he found in his head as the basis for all other knowledge. Many philosophers question the starting point of the first person of this knowledge theory. Finally (for our purposes), many philosophers descartes, there is no doubt (or at least unquestionable) to make the standards too high and make skeptics work too easy We rely on necessity.

The spirit of introduction is a supernatural entity with the power to influence someone's or something's behavior. Human beings can see the soul through the Bible. Technically, according to Webster (2013), its spirit is "people are considered to give life, energy, power, is an essential principle for bringing animation or life to life in life forms. The evil spirits of evil spirits and evil spirits may be those that people inherit demons and kill and make them supernatural. "These are spiritual truths related to the spiritual world, and in the same way the truth of the material world is deduced from these spiritual reality, the substance is a sign of spirituality and a trace. In the world and heaven, you will find a way to form waterdrops after the ocean, with substance and spirit, coincidence and necessity, special and universal, structure and foundation, appearance and reality, and everything inside and outside. The atoms are constructed in proportion to their ability and possibilities after the sun.The details are universal and what seems to be common amongst the things in fact is that their eyes are It is hidden in detail of reality and existence compared with. It is closely related to my first two evidences, but as intelligence abstracts things and 'spiritual' existence form and has the ability to form an idea of ​​non-material reality moderate toughness People can not produce something they do not have. There must be a spirit; therefore, the immortal principle (soul) will be the reality of these spirits. If that is important, that can not be done. Material abilities such as vision react only to external stimuli. Since a "part" is acted on by some other "part", it is only called "perception". When our intelligence reflects its own intellectual behavior, we can add our existence behavior as well. It is both a subject of knowledge and an object of knowledge. It is only that the soul can do this without any part. Dogs can not contemplate their knowledge and behavior. It's just a scratch! This is rational knowledge It is totally different. I deny the meaning of spirituality or personal search as a spiritual opioid, so I do not want to complete this article. Spiritual fraud does not mean that all spirituality is fraud. I think the pursuit of self-actualization and the will to power are the driving force of existence. So, if you are going on a spiritual path, I can only say one thing that suggests what you should do. Please ask other people to read, see and listen. Please question and think about everything you feel. The nature of the query also has doubts. Please disassemble this article. Fundamental skepticism is the only way to separate wisdom from masters and ministers. The fundamental skepticism is the only way to put yourself in a new situation that ultimately teaches you something new and may move you to grow.

Appleby Book Review tells the truth about history I am writing a book review on the truth about Joyce Appleby, Lynn Hunt and Margaret Jacob. In this book, the author is talking about increasing skepticism and relativism which reduced our ability to actually know and write about the past. This book discusses the writing of history and how people struggle with the truth problem. It also discusses postmodernist movement and how future historians can avoid historical mistakes of the past. Look for important reviews of books with review sources such as "Book Review Index", "Book Review Summary", "Journal Summary" (access to local libraries is required for this procedure). Is the comment positive? Is the book under consideration regarded as a valuable contribution to this field? Did the commentator mention other books that might be better? If so, please find these sources to get more information about your topic About the truth about history, I write book reviews about Joyce Eppie, Lynn Hunter, Margaret Jacob. In this book, the author is talking about increasing skepticism and relativism which reduced our ability to actually know and write about the past. This book discusses the writing of history and how people struggle with the truth problem. It also discusses postmodernist movement and how future historians can avoid historical mistakes of the past. Telling the truth about history provides good insight and knowledge besides historians, because it verifies the controversy and deficiencies of the past historical research methods and the fact that science has died. I do not think that history is written in the laboratory, so I can not compare it with science. In my comment, I will criticize the idea of ​​three absoluteists advocated by Newton and Darwin. Reviewing books is an important part of historians' occupations. Historical students are expected to study this subject: to become a historian. In order to review the book on history, we must provide some information about the subject, region and period. A book bibliography should provide you with a reference to the source of information. The journal is also a great place to find this information and find academic book reviews It also helps to understand this form and let you know what your comment should be like. I reviewed some of my genre books and followed some blogs / reviewers who commented on their comments about other books. I have never asked someone on these blogs to review my book, but some people are seeking a copy of my book. Please note that I did not mention about getting comments on my long-term interests and goals? If I stick to long-term concerns, I think that comments will happen organic over time; they are one of many factors that will help me achieve my long-term goal It is not. In fact, in the past few months, I focused on community writing and reading, so some good results began to appear.

Ethical theory of philosophy As we know, philosophers divide ethical theories into three categories. They are meta ethical (descriptive), conceptual (applied) and normative (normative). Meta-ethics basically uses scientific methods to adjust where our moral principles and philosophies come from (Feiser, 2005). I. This is a philosophical ethical theory, not a theological theory. In other words, natural ethical ethics theory helps to understand through human reasoning of each person whether human behavior is morally right or wrong without using God's revelation or church teaching. It has been studied and refined for centuries as a means to solve the matter of moral justice that we must face the true moral dilemma. This is not a new, arrogant, unproven, or unfounded moral theory. Natural law ethics is not defined as imposing a person's religion or belief system on others, but may still agree that it may object to imposing that person's moral system on others . Accordingly, we can point out several facts. First, natural law ethics can maintain itself well in complex scientific and enthusiastic arguments (not discussed here) compared to other philosophical ethics. Second, there is no "neutral" morality that may be "perfect" for our diverse society - regardless of whether it is now useful or not. This includes Utilitarianism, relativism, or communism ethics theory. None are "neutral", not all normative ethical theories. Therefore, whether we accept this fact or not, we are "forcing" the philosophical or social ethical theory which is not always neutral at all times. Finally, as pointed out by the "abortion declaration", "In the mission of law it is not right to choose a viewpoint or impose a different viewpoint rather than a different view, provided that the life of the child is all It takes precedence over the viewpoint. " Another word about moral philosophy is orderly. Philosophical ethics generally avoid doctrinal principles and strict and unordered orders, unlike certain ethical codes of conduct and even ethics and orders arising from religious sources. One of the purposes of sound philosophical ethics is to communicate between irrational doctrine on the one hand and moral skepticism that is not grounded on the other. Therefore philosophical ethics places great emphasis on granting rationality and supports both the moral principle itself and the competitive claim of doctrinal ethics and moral skepticism. In addition, as shown in the following story, the fundamental moral principles of the most prominent ethical theory can serve as the basis for solving specific problems related to human subject the experiment.

In many ways, the question about the government is part of the American DNA. This skepticism is not without reason - the behavior of American politicians in the 1960s and 1970s led most Americans to wonder about the motives of elected officials. But this skepticism is rarely raised when discussing the government's involvement in accusing repression of the African-American community. Most people believe that for sympathy and humanity, the government will implement equal opportunities for minorities. By the passage of the Civil Rights Movement, the 1964 Civil Rights Act and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (both signed by Democratic Party Lindon Johnson), conservative Republicans seized the political opportunity to grasp it. Republicans have taken action to attract white people, particularly sullen South Democrats who were unable to confront civil rights and the party that promised perfect African-American citizenship. This is the so-called Southern strategy, which is the second important factor in the recent deprivation formula. Richard Nixon 's strategist was developed by Kevin Phillips, but expressed in the cruel clarity of Lee Atwater who helped guide the Ronald Reagan campaign, that is easy. After civil rights movement, complete racism will no longer be political, but recessive racism can still affect public policy. Stone pointed out that Barry Goldwater (a vote opposed to the civil rights law in 1964) is one of the reasons he fell in love with politics. Then he continued working for Richard Nixon. And it was famous for carrying out "South strategy" which was based on the use of bondage by civil rights law as a means of controlling the politics of the original slave. Stone first saw Donald Trump when he was running for the Reagan New York campaign. Stone was introduced to Trump by Roy Cohen, senior legal counsel of infamous Senator Joe McCarthy during the notorious "red panic" era. When he filed suit against the card under fair housing law against racial discrimination, Cohen is tracking Donald's defense against playing cards. I found that 1964 and 1965 are the most important two years of the civil rights movement. The 1964 Civil Rights Act officially prohibits racial (and sexual) discrimination in the United States. The establishment of the "Voting Rights Act" in 1965 banned the literacy test at the polling place. These two laws are thought to be a breakthrough event of the civil rights movement and a great achievement. However, the momentum of the civil rights movement began to shake in 1966. The division within the movement brought the emergence of two new advocacy groups, black power movement and black panther. Both proved to be radical and extreme than non-violent approaches of the civil rights movement

Existentialism is defined as "a philosophical theory or method of emphasizing the existence of an individual as a free and responsible agent and determining his own development by act of will". In other words, existentialism emphasizes individual freedom. The number of existential views is abundant throughout strangers. The experience using Mersault conveys the view that human life has no meaning other than simple existence. Existentialism in the corberstation of Albert's "stranger" reflects the relationship with Mary of Mersault, the death of Maman of her mother, the murder of the Arab, the life experience of trial and execution of Mersault. When writing 'strangers', Albert Camus insisted on the idea of ​​existentialism. That is the philosophy he truly believes. However, there is no criticism of existential philosophy. Herbert Marcuse is criticizing the existentialism, especially in the presence and absence of Sartre and projects certain features of life in contemporary repressive society such as anxiety and insensitivity to the essence of the existence itself. It is a philosophical theory that it is still idealistic: it assumes certain historical conditions of human existence as a characteristic of ontology and metaphysics. "Marx says that existentialism is doing the wrong idea because human condition seems to be tragic and lacking purpose.In fact, they exist. Existentialism was a very popular philosophy in France after World War II and was welcomed by a typical philosopher John Paul Sartre. For proper introduction of existential ideology, "stranger" is a novel written by Albert Camus, a novelist and existentialist. The movie revealing the existential philosophy is the life of I Spin Huckabees of Richard Linklater and David Oracel. The work that best communicates the idea of ​​existential existence is "stranger" for its simplicity and a way to write it well. One way to create existentialism in "strangers" is to use nihilistic philosophical thinking. Mersault insists on this view. Nihilism is the rejection of all religious beliefs and in essence convinces life is meaningless. Mersault is a chaotic idea. Because he lives through the full concentration of the body and has no meaning, and almost nothing. - There are problems that can not be ignored. We must recognize that this is the first step to propose a solution and to make a change. There is still an organization that cultivates cloustic skepticism forged as a fake camouflage. Climate skepticism is a kind of propaganda, global warming is only natural, he states that human beings are irrelevant.

There are problems that can not be ignored. We must recognize that this is the first step to propose a solution and to make a change. There is still an organization that cultivates cloustic skepticism forged as a fake camouflage. Climate skepticism is an advertisement that points out that global warming is only natural and that humans are irrelevant. They used a well designed approach to prove that climate change is a fraud and tried to use a false scientific discovery to crush those truly verifiable discoveries. Global warming is defined as an increase in the Earth 's atmosphere. This is very harmful to the environment. Pollution is another important cause of global warming. Air pollution, water pollution, soil contamination, and greenhouse gas pollution can cause global warming. Greenhouse gases, especially those generated by humans, are responsible for the increase in global warming. Global warming can have various fatal effects such as disease transmission, hot water, even more hurricanes, natural disasters, immigrants, conflicts, wars, and so on. To avoid this effect, global warming can not be completely eliminated, but it can be drastically reduced. Global warming needs to take its impact seriously and it is necessary to take measures to reduce global warming to maintain an appropriate and sustainable environment. Greenhouse effect is one cause of global warming. Global warming is caused by various factors and various kinds of pollution. The main type of pollution affecting global warming is air pollution. Air pollution is simply defined as air pollution and is related to the greenhouse effect. Air pollution can also be defined as "adding chemical substances harmful to the atmosphere". The most serious air pollution is caused especially by burning fossil fuels in internal combustion engines (Dictionary.com) Air pollution has changed the climate of our planet, but not all types of air pollution have the same impact. There are various kinds of air pollution. Several types accelerate global warming. Other factors contribute to global warming by temporary cooling effect in a few days or weeks. For further information on contamination causing global warming and pollution causing the earth to cool down please read on this point. In addition, we emit high levels of pollutants that cause serious environmental problems on a global scale. It is climate change and destruction of the ozone layer. Humans were able to influence the atmosphere around the Earth and the Earth itself.

With Plato and Rachel's self-interest and moral skepticism, the author attempts to fight moral theory which claims psychological egoism, the motive of all people finally is self-interest. Each author denies that this is the possibility of an effective conclusion of philosophical ethics and each author provides an alternative solution to the origin of human motivation. Whether we can act in a way that is not selfish will directly affect the implementation of ethics throughout the world. In Plato 's Republic and Rachel' s egoism and moral skepticism, both authors tackle two important aspects of human morality: objectivity of epistemology. Moral egoism is a normative argument that states that moral beings should do what is in their best interests. On the other hand, psychological egoism is a descriptive assertion that all moral creatures can only act for their own benefit, even if they act for the benefit of others. The difference between the two claims is that one is a normative claim and the other is a descriptive claim. Normological assertions include determining what people should do and creating ethical standards. Therefore, descriptive claims basically explain behaviors of moral beings and create ethical standards based on their behavior. Because of the relevance of these two arguments, I must first clearly distinguish the main features of each discussion. In "Challenge of Cloncon", Plato has established a long dialogue between Socrates and Plato's Brothers Grocone First, I will first study the "Glaucon challenge" of moral and psychological self-interest. In the Republic of Plato, Socrates raised the question of whether good and virtue is truly worth to the individual. In the ring of Gyges, Socrates tells the story of a man named Glaucon who discovered the ring. Among them, he brought up the question of whether we take fair action despite the fact that we can escape immoral behavior. Essentially, he asked if we should send a beautiful life. Next he asked me to imagine that a kind person and a rogue would receive one of them if we had two such rings. Glaucon insists that corruption uses the ring naturally for personal joy without any ethical constraints. Regarding moral persons, Glaucon suggested that his behavior would not be better than fraud. He defended this position and insisted that no one had sufficient will to resist the temptation to do things for his own interests.

Practicalism, empiricism, and practicalism of David Hume are based on the philosophy that experience has to test and retest the idea and experience determines the reality. The practitioner also does not believe in the existence of absolute truths and values. David Hume said: "We can not draw evidence from the fact that we are very carefully watching, if we doubt, we can not be convinced" ("Theory" 2645). Hume's empiricist ideal is the root of early pragmatism and in our reality there is nothing to be confirmed and everything perceptible must always be qualified to find a place of reality . Hume's epistemology David Hume is a Scottish philosopher known for his skepticism and empiricism. Hume strives to develop John Rock 's empiricism better through scientific research on our humanity. If we do not clarify this problem, we can not rely on common sense to explain human behavior. In other words, Hume said that it is urgent to observe how humans do this because humans are actually living and working in this world. The main John Locke, Berkeley, Hume are both empiricist philosophers. They all have different opinions, but I agree with three anchor points; the only source of true knowledge is sensual experience, unreliable unless it is based on a strong foundation of sensual experience It is inappropriate knowledge route. There is no evidence that natural thoughts in mind are learned from experience. Every philosopher has developed some of the most attractive concepts. David Hume Hume, David, 1711-76, Scottish philosopher, and historian. Hume brings empiricalism of John Rock and George Berkeley to the logical extremes of fundamental skepticism. He denied the possibility of certain kinds of knowledge and found a series of emotions in his mind and believed that the causal relationship in nature was entirely from B's introduction. The answer to the theme is drawn by the time committee named as illusion by David Hume, and the time committee named human by himself. In the era of modern philosophy, when the influence of Descartes was still important, David Hume brought the argument of killing the Descartes I created and skipping it like a ghost in human perception. You can see not only the theme but also the contrast between Hume and Descartes.

My intention in this article is to demonstrate that the discussion on the existence of God and the fear of deception in Descartes 'First Philosophy' controversy is rather weak and does not prove his conclusion. To support these arguments, we first outline the two concrete meditations and explain the proposed discussion. Later, I criticize his argument and reveal unjust conclusions. Suspicion of text includes features of God's proposal, perfect conditions, and the nature of fraud. In the first paper by Thomas Lennon and Michael Hickson, Descartes' suspicion of meditation, in particular all certainty decisions, even meditation - depends on the certainty of God's existence. As seen at the end of this review, this article points out the secret to understanding meditation control. Deborah Brown believes Descartes 'skepticism is at least somewhat deeper, even if there is significant importance between Descartes' skepticism and ancient skepticism. It is fundamental as it spans the contents of Descartes. Our thoughts As I said before, God plays an important role in Death Cart's meditation, including prove the existence of God. Through his meditation, Descart experienced a lot of evidence about the existence of God that starts from meditation 3 through to the end. This is God's first role in the Cartesian system. Because it's like building blocks, an important part of the system structure. Because he uses the concept of God (in particular the deceptive god) to prove the conclusion. Eliminate all the other things he may have doubts. He dispels the allegations of the devil through evidence of the presence of a merciful God. He also used God as evidence of a clear and clear perception. Several important arguments from meditation III-V I. Third meditation: God presence A. Cosmological evidence of the existence of God In the third meditation, Descartes says that God (i) exists, ( ii) the essence of trying to prove that it is a meditator (the essence of being the author of thinking), and (iii) why a meditator exists (even if it exists at another moment from one moment). The premise of the existence of God is that each one of us understands the following clear and unique concept of God.

"Under such circumstances, there is no place for industries because of its uncertainty in such circumstances: Art, letters, society, and in the worst case the danger of sustained fear and violent death, and human life Loneliness, poverty, hatred, barbarity, and short lived. "- Thomas Hobbs Speaker A: The historical story is a story of a class struggle. The revolution is necessary to overthrow the ruling class and ultimately to create a classless society such that no one will be exploited. Speaker B: The kingship is absolute, and the prince needs to record his actions to everyone. Where is the word of the king, there is no power. Without such absolute authority, the king does not do good deeds nor oppress evil. Speaker C: The government should do business alone. It should let the natural supply and demand law decide what to produce, how to produce, who will work, price of goods, wage rate and all other economic problems. Spokesperson D: Men are born and have free rights and equal rights. All governments are responsible for protecting and protecting these natural, non-assignable rights. "I do not think it is part of my responsibility to invent new ideas, but they use common sense of people about that subject to get their consent ... this is because Americans Mind. "- Thomas Jefferson It is independent. There are other considerations to determine whether there is a reasonable human test for an independent threat. 1. 1. Occupational skepticism is an attitude to cast doubt and is a critical evaluation of evidence. 2. Professional skepticism is exercised in various ways. An example is not to ignore the same person using two different color inks on the same day. Skepticism is a philosophical tradition of the West, and we insist that man never acquires knowledge. The skepticism and its derivatives that began in the middle of the 4th century BC are based on the following principles. Human knowledge has no certainty. All human knowledge may be real, that is, most of the time is true or not true. Cultures other than Western Europe have a particularly skeptical tradition. The two subsets O 1 and O 2 have similar sizes and two of them. This may result in failure: Reduceto O 1.O 1 test failed - O 1 asallertestcase.6 Reduceto O 2. Test O 1 failed but test O 2 failed - O 2 is the smallest. ignorance. Both tests passed or were not resolved - neither O 1 nor O 2 are subject to potential simplification. In the first two cases, you can simply continue to search this subset as shown in Figure 4. Each line of dia-gramows configuration. The number represents the included change, and the dot represents the exclude change. Change 7 is the smallest of the failed test cases and can be separated in just a few steps. Standard tests are tests that require (1) all examinees to answer the same questions in the same way, or to select questions from a common problem basis, and (2) to test for "standard" It refers to the format. In a consistent way, this allows you to compare the relative performance of individual students or groups of students. In this way we can "standardize" various kinds of tests and evaluations, but this term mainly concerns large studies of large numbers of students including multi-choice tests at all 8th grade public schools doing. For example, a student in a particular state

Montaigne Montaigne began exploring human knowledge with apology of Raymond Sebond and believed that only God could obtain real knowledge. God is the only infinite, and everyone sees it and has the wisdom of God. He is not bound by the laws and regulations of the human realm, it exists in areas other than human understanding. God is a permanent eternal existence, the notion of truth propagated only from this country. Montaigne considers this linking all truths to be such a permanent concept. The article is "Apology of Raymond Sayban", reflecting the skepticism of Montagne's Christianity. The other is "Friendship" inspired by the relationship between Etiender · Boettie and Montigny in the latter half who became friends at the Bordeaux Diet. The first two volumes of Montaigne Essais (essay) were published in 1580. In Italy in 1581 - he was seeking treatment of his kidney stone - Montagne was told that he was elected mayor of Bordeaux. He served as the mayor from 1581 to 1585, alleviating the conflict between Protestantism and Catholics. Meanwhile, the second version of prose came in 1582 The most important and influential person in the development of Renaissance skepticism is Michel de Montagne (1533-1592). The most thorough introduction to his skeptical view was made in his thesis. The longest and most philosophical apology de Raimond Sebond (Raymond Debon apology). Among them, he gradually developed many questions to people that suspect rationality of human reason. He considered the old skepticism that information on sensation and rationality is unreliable, human beings can not find a satisfactory level of knowledge, and the relative nature of moral opinion can not be found. His conclusion is that people should discontinue decision on all matters and follow customs and traditions. He combined these conclusions with faith. Montaigne began exploring human knowledge with an apology for Raymond Sebond who believed only God could obtain real knowledge. God is the only infinite, and everyone sees it and has the wisdom of God. He is not bound by the laws and regulations of the human realm, it exists in areas other than human understanding. God is a permanent eternal existence, the notion of truth propagated only from this country. Montaigne considers this linking all truths to be such a permanent concept. Montaigne even said that "the truth must be everywhere" (xxvi). He insists that the only product of mankind endured the test of time and has not changed since it was a Catholic church since its inception. Catholic doctrine is classified as "always consistently and always everywhere". The power of Catholic faith comes from its static nature and provides a source of truth to mankind.

So, what you said about Andy, or "gold" was born in the novel (Hello, poetry!), Led a series of questions about love. Sarah Kay often talks about writing poetry as a question making process - doing something on the page, or finding answers or more questions within the process. When you ask David Orr of poetry critic, he may tell you that poetry and music are two different art forms. His response to the Bob Dylan Nobel Prize for Literature almost summarized his skepticism about the blurring of music and poetry boundaries. Literature and composition Langston Hughes and Bob Dylan Langston Hughes and Bob Dylan are two contemporary American poet poets from different eras. Bob Dylan is like a composer, but I consider most of his work as poetry. In this article I will explain the Hughes poem "Harlem" and Dylan's "A-Changin era" as a cultural explanation, but the background is different. Both poets use social protest actions to express their views. - The poems of Langston Hughes 's "I, Too" and Karen' s "Event" use different forms of visual images, tones, exaggerations, symbols and prophecies to explain the commonalities between the two different races ing. The interaction of life can not fight their prejudice like the private life of African-American civil war.

Montagne, one of the greatest thoughters of Renaissance, often studied himself as a research subject. While using myself, he weighed the human body and tried to evaluate his personality, customs, his opinion, and the opinions of others. He is seeking the truth by looking back at his reading, traveling, and public and private experiences. His composition is light and technical. He is also a good example of Renaissance skepticism and fanaticism. Fiedism is a strategy that uses skepticism to clarify the foundation of Catholicism. Michelle Echem de Montagne, commonly known as Michel de Montagne, was born on February 28, 1533 in Montagne Castle (France, near Bordeaux). Montagne 's wealthy father, Pierre Ekemed Montagne decided to cultivate his son' s intellectual development with Latin as the first language. Montagne did not learn French until 6 years old. His father's death also meant that Montagne inherited family estate. In 1571, Montagne retreated to his castle and protected himself from public daily life. He also began writing personal and subjective thinking about topics such as religion, education, friendship, love, and freedom. Montagne called his original work Essa. He developed a new literary genre: articles The focus of this course is Michel de Montaigne and Essay. We will discuss the life of Montagne, his way, acceptance of his prose since his first publication in 1580, and the influence of Montagne on leading writers including Shakespeare. We also complete his style by practicing his writing style, understanding his thoughts from life, and writing articles. This course offers students the opportunity to learn real experience. Collaborate with the A & S Academic Integrity Initiative Coordinator and the CCS Innovation Team, students research, develop, create, and edit multimodal scripts, sample paragraphs, source-based academic writing courses, assessments and other materials. The Online Academic Integrity module is used by new UA students in the upcoming term. Materials for reading courses include James Lang's cheating courses, plagiarism and articles on issues of academic integrity.

Energy is known for its long tradition and thought to be part of Japanese culture, but due to their cast, medieval Japanese rhythm of the 14th and 16th centuries, most of today Japanese people do not like this drama. . Modern Japanese users do not understand and they lack penetration into the entertainment community. However, by understanding dramatic plots such as Ise-Monogatari, Genji Monogatari, Heike Monogatari, you can gain enjoyment and gratitude performance as an intermediary between God and man (Handout 14). . Enlightenment (or called enlightenment or rational period) is a traditional intellectual movement that began in Europe in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, emphasizing reasons and individualism rather than tradition. Its purpose is to reform the usage of reason in that area based on experimental thinking of rehearsals and beliefs, and advanced vision to transcend logical methods. It promotes logical beliefs, skepticism and intellectual communication. It challenges superstition and intolerance and is the most popular goal of the Catholic Church. Okay, men and girls, ready to enlightenment In this lesson I will introduce enlightenment. what is that? Enlightenment, sometimes called the era of enlightenment, was an intellectual movement from the late 17th century to the early 18th century, emphasizing reasons, individualism, and skepticism. Enlightenment challenged the traditional religious view. Because that was such a wide movement, enlightenment did not have an accurate start date. It did not pop up, but it gradually developed. Most historians came to the beginning of enlightenment from the mid 17th century to the beginning of the 18th century. The work of intellectuals like Rene Descartes, Barus Spinoza, Isaac Newton is particularly important for the creation of enlightenment. Another important moment in the development of Western culture is enlightenment. Enlightenment was an intellectual movement that took place from the end of the 17th century to the beginning of the 19th century. Enlightenment emphasized the contents of reason, science and skepticism. The attitude and values ​​we have today are mainly products of enlightenment. In particular, Thomas Jefferson was deeply influenced by Enlightenmentism, the ideal of the Enlightenment the foundation of the American government.

The three fields of knowledge - the truths of art, science, and history are very different and different from each other. In particular, the meaning and role of truth are very different. The definition of the truth by the Oxford dictionary's dictionary is "one based on reality, facts or reality", or "one recognized as fact or belief in truth". Finding the truth from the knowledge of three fields is highly dependent on how people perceive the truth. Therefore, the truth is very subjective. Truth is usually defined as fact or reality. In further research, the truth is divided into differences according to the field of knowledge and problem. Sometimes we need more than one to prove the truth, but sometimes we only need one way to announce the facts. There are many arguments in various ways when you need to acquire knowledge. - John Gibbons' Truth in Behavior 'Summary: John Gibbons' attempt to prove similarities and differences between different incidents reveals the relevance of causal relationship attributes. Based on these considerations, Gibbons' main argument is that one person gives the real value of causality to his or her faith. This means that the true theory of deflation will be false. But before evaluating the effectiveness of knowledge in various fields in communicating the truth it is necessary to define the truth or more precisely to clarify its nature. In many cases, people rely on their own senses to observe information obtained from reliable sources and learn from them. But history has repeatedly shown that 'common sense', the foundation of authority and consensus, is not always the most reliable way to get the truth. For example, from the 2nd to the 16th century, people believed in Ptolemy's system. The earth is the center of the universe, all the planets and stars were rotating around them. This idea is also consistent with personal observations about the stability of the earth, the movement of stars and planets, and the support of the Catholic Church. Contracts between reasons and truth epistemology and methods of knowledge production, and questions about different knowledge claims. The problem is what people know. At the heart of this research area is skepticism, many of which involve attempts to refute certain forms of school. In this article we discuss the skepticism of epistemological schools, the creation of contributors to schools, and how the schools developed from there. Epistemology is the study of the nature and scope of knowledge, and reasonable beliefs. It analyzes the relationship between the nature of knowledge and similar concepts such as truths, beliefs, and reasons. It also includes questions on how knowledge is created and about different claims of knowledge. It is primarily concerned with problems related to the creation and dissemination of knowledge in specific research fields. Questions raised by epistemology include questions such as "what is knowledge", "how knowledge is obtained", "what people are aware of", "necessary and sufficient conditions of knowledge", "structure What is "What is"? "What makes the legitimate belief reasonable?" "How do you understand the concept of defense?" "Why is internal or external?"

The article by H. J. McCloskey "As an atheist" provides insight into the atheist view. It provides a comparison of anti - theological views related to the existence of God. It shows the reasons and advantages behind atheistic beliefs to prove its superiority as a source of strength. In this article, McCloskey refers to arguments such as cosmological argument, objective argument, design theory discussion as evidence. He argues that because there is no evidence that these arguments are true, it is not so, therefore our idea should be released from the existence of God. In this article, Ryan Stringer criticizes the reaction to evil atheism, known as "skepticism". He first developed a simple atheistic argument from evil and then simply proved its two premises. Then he defended the potential reaction to skeptics. First, he argues that skepticism is inherently unbelievable, brings the result, it makes it unreasonable correspondence and indirectly defends his view. Secondly, he directly defended his argument by proposing arguments that support his second premise. Stringer concluded that skeptical theology would not destroy his argument. Last week I officially landed on the Internet and became one out of 8% of Americans. In my post, he was called an "atheist or agnostic" hard "to be an atheist." My friend had an unexpected and effective response. Some of them have not spoken to me for years. It is powerful and moving, I notice that we have quietly lived together, and imagine that we are alone in the formation of this doubt and doubt. When we explore the commonalities we experience, we are shocked that other people are already feeling our pain, and I think that why "after-Christian atheism" is secular I am wondering whether it will not be discussed in culture. If I can get guidance on tentative Christian beliefs: "What do you expect when you go backwards" or some useful tutorial, it will be of great help to me. I noticed that the general nature of the atheist 's reaction to this article is a regrettable misunderstanding for my purpose. Most people seem to think of a comprehensive Christian who apologizes for atheism, or at least think about the unbearable evidence of Christianity. This is not a vision. For the sake of clarity, this article aims to clarify why the following atheists (or rather arguing) could not achieve their goals when discussing with Christians. There are many arguments against Christianity, but this article is about the most popular discussion, not about the most popular discussion. Many Christians are unaware of this, and many atheists do not say that it is very difficult to become an atheist by forsaking away your faith and it is terribly time consuming. Become an atheist (or agnostic, polytheist, etc.), rip off the structure of your personal identity and tore up all the psychological, emotional and logical assurance that you trust earlier, and your support Destroy the network and the community. As a former Christian, I understand this directly. Unfortunately, there is no discussion between Christians and atheists on this subject. So I am here and talking about it on the internet.

This is not a theory, but a theory that teaches rationalization of human rule. They say that God was given the right to rule them, but only God has the right to be appointed to him. Therefore, the sacred right of the king is to deprive the right of God to rule humanity. It is the supporters of the king and their pastors who insist that God gives them the right to take away sovereignty of people violently. They did it, did not they? This proves that God is with them. The first person who deprives God of human rights is Nimrod. He frankly insisted that he is a god. Do you remember the tower of Babel? Because politics are basically people's cults, politicians around the world are making the same claim. So they imitated Nimrod and lived on his own tower The day of judgment is to set things, which will restore the correct human ruler, God in all eyes. It tells people that there is no God's right to the king, but a guy, if I believe it, 666 marks on the amount of a believer, if supported, the supporter mark's hand It is placed inside, which dominated the concept of a man God 's command theory that it is the existence of a distinctive god, agree with it, but obedience to the will of God' s righteousness to the absence of God. This view has been criticized for Pluto's Eutepron (see Euphpron's problem), but has retained some modern defense (Robert Adams, Philippe Quinn et al.). Despite subjectiveism, like the ideal observer theory, sacred command theory is still universal. Moral error theory is another form of antipathy, he expressed the moral assertion that the proposition mistakes all these propositions. Therefore, according to the theory of error, the sentence "killing is morally wrong" and "the murder is morally acceptable" are incorrect. J. L. McKee is probably the most famous advocate of this view. Since error theory requires nihilism, the erroneous theory denies the existence of moral truth, so moral skepticism is also necessary, but that does not necessarily mean nihilism, moral skepticism, Whether it is a wrong theory The sacred command theory is a moral theory that declares that God's will is the basis of morals. If God or God orders it, something is morally right or wrong, mandatory, permitted or not permitted, based on God's command theory. In God's instruction theory, it is a moral or immoral act to do God's orders or ban. In addition to being God, ordinate another aspect of God's command theory to do certain things, but also that if the motive of God, the action is moral. In the motivation of this sacred command theory, in addition to religious documents, some people can motivate to practice morality.

For centuries seeking to find out who we are, where we are from, where we go after we die, and what governs our world I have fascinated mankind. Famous philosophers dedicated their lives to the development of the theory, but the closest theory of success is that their theory is not to be disputed. "I do not know" to one of the oldest problems of civilization may be the only true answer as facts have not been proven to be true. The idea that we can not know the answers to these questions and many other questions leads to the theory of skepticism. Since we have different knowledge by having different experiences, we can doubt our knowledge. But this is how the "good" God wants. As easily as denying the premise, we can deny evil demon theory by rejecting premise 2. In addition, Descartes denies any theory, but still can use his same thought process. He can deny evil Satan theory using Descartes' knowledge structure and deny one of the facilities. Another way to reject premise 2 is to define knowledge. Descartes insists that knowledge must be undoubted. It must be applied to all other theories and ideas. This is the reason why evil devil theory still exists. However, if Descartes defines knowledge as the fact that his perception is proved, evil devil theory may still be wrong. For example, knowledge comes from our perception, so we do not perceive this demon. According to premise 1, the devil does not exist. Can the negative premise 2 prove that the discussion of skepticism is wrong? Descartes chose to keep premise 2 the truth, because he believes that knowledge must be undoubted. However, premise 2 can be refused as easily as premise 1 is rejected. There are two ways to deny the premise that the first method can be traced back to Socrates. The second method involves the definition of knowledge. Socrates asked questions: What is the difference between knowledge and pure faith? Socrates replied that knowledge is a true belief and believers have sufficient reasons. Then Aristotle asked about how knowledge is possible. Faith can only prove its validity by relying on other reasonable beliefs. This leads to the view that all knowledge is proved by other knowledge and the chain keeps stretching in the reverse direction until the basic basic belief has no basic reason. The BIV argument is valid. Therefore, the relevant alternative theorist must deny one of the premises. They agree that you do not know that you are not a BIV, so they accept the first premise. Therefore, they reject the second premise. Even if you do not know that you are not a BIV, you know that you have a hand. In fact, this means that the relevant alternative theorists deny the principle of termination. Let's consider this detail. A related alternative theorist says that this approach has two main problems. First of all, accusing BIV's alternative means is irrelevant unless supplementing the principle description explaining the reason for deprecating the alternative of BIV. Second, the principle of closure has a high degree of internal rationality. If you refuse it, a so-called abominable conjunction is generated. This is one:

In the excerpt from Othello language importance analysis, many of the changes in spoken language function of William Shakespeare, aimed at making the word more reliable and contributing to the dramatic effect of the scene I have an example. This language is very important in this scene as Iago is a tool for operating Othello. Language corruption broke Othello's view. In scenario 3, the keyword "honest" is used only 14 times. Ironically, Othello is looking forward to the truth of "honest" Iago, and Othello proves that his judgment is the honesty of Iago. In addition to giving up his decision to Iago, Othello surrendered to Iago at the end of the scene when he saw that belief (evidence). This is the evidence he got through Iago, which caused his embarrassment, and ultimately the game tragedy. Essay.com/Shakespeare, 'Othello', Champion - 'The third act starts with love and ends with jealousy. Describe the change of emotion against Odello's Desedemona Shakespeare, 'Othello', champion - 'The third act starts with love and ends with jealousy. Describe the change of emotion against Odello's Desedemona One of Othello's most interesting mysteries is the relationship between talking and knowledge (or lack thereof), which ultimately leads to the collapse of Othello. Some may think Othello, derived from a powerful and poisonous Iago language that hurts other Othello voices and knowledgeable thinking, lacks understanding throughout the script. People may be satisfied with the words that influence such strong direct persons and can get used to. Othello? In Othello, the language is opaque and unwieldy, powerless margin, human beings are full of wrong skepticism rooted in. Knowledge In this way, Othello of Shakespeare interprets as a claim that skepticism (in Othello) is created in his own mind and that language may easily worsen skepticism and ambiguous knowledge be able to. But it is hardly strengthened How does Shakespeare use language and drama equipment to show off embarrassing theme of Othello? ----- Othello knows a tragic story about love, jealousy, murder. Shakespeare 's Othello is in Venice, headed to Cyprus with a curse of the same name. Love for his wife is a black soldier who ultimately brought her death. Incorporating into social and emotional subtle plots is a number of important themes, including race (color of Othello), love and jealousy. Key Person, Otherwise Looking at Othello of Shakespeare, the theme of jealousy is obvious. Tragedy Othello is focusing on the tragic consequences of Othello and other key figures. In Shakespeare 's Othello, Cricket was drawn by the hero of Iago and Othello. As it made it possible to show his true self, it completely eroded their lives, and in order that Othello in turn made absolute conversions and destroyed the life of their friends I urged. Othello is the main theme of the sarcasm of Othello of William Shakespeare and represents the dual meaning of jealousy, seems to have nothing but the basis and style of Othello, white is black, usually a conflict between the character and the theme It is an aspect to do. Ironic is one of the characteristics of a tragedy. The result is inevitable, but that is unfair. In the first act of the first act, Shakespeare set the theme: jealousy, revenge, foreign phobia and racial discrimination, love, appearance and inner heart.

We live in an era when everyone is looking for reasons to believe something. Posters and advertisements say that "only prayer can save the United States." If prayer can save us, only one question needs to be answered. Who is praying? What are we praying for? God is omnipotent, the creator of all things, without the world there is neither the world nor us. However, many people are wondering if he really exists. There are many philosophical thoughts in this world that God, Platonism, Naturalism, Aristotle, Realism, Empiricism, and Rationalism exist. . The truth about God can respond to observations (the empiricism) about the world through individuals through critique evaluation (rationalism) of the internal logic of different belief systems through human beings. Experience to discover (mysticism), or through combinations of these means? Discussion about finding these different ways of God's truth depends on our beliefs below. Establishment of theology to provide evidence that Christianity is the correct version of theology. Supporters of the majority of this approach argue that they always interpret them according to their own world view, so there is no need to present arguments from historical evidence until people accept theological view of the theology. There is some quote between rationalism and empathism, the use of skepticism in particular, the doubt that other ideas are reality, and the pattern of thinking leading to the truth or real nature of knowledge. However, this skepticism fundamentally opposes rationalism and empiricism. There are three important principles in rationalism: application of specific principles to infer the conclusions, the concepts born of our birth, the idea of ​​nature, that is, to determine the conclusion I am using logic

Regardless of whether we are portraying our perceptions or depicting the perception of the physical world, consciousness is the experience we have every day. David Chalmers provides insight into consciousness by first identifying simple questions presented by awareness and then identifying confusing issues and problems that can not be fully explained. This problem is an important topic, and many philosophers are trying to provide a solution to this problem. For Chalmers, difficult questions are related to our experience. Is there a possibility that consciousness problem and material problem are related? There is a tradition of linking physical and conscious problems. In other words, it is the field of quantum theory of consciousness. Quantum physics and consciousness are inexplicable, so these theories may be falsely false. The idea of ​​a connection between a strong awareness problem and a difficult material problem may be subject to the same criticism. However, if you look closely, it is clear that these two problems are complementary in a deeper and clearer manner. One of the first philosophers who noticed this relationship was Leibniz until the late 17th century, but the exact modern version of this idea was attributed to Bertrand Russell. Recently, modern philosophers including Chalmers and Strawson rediscovered it. It is like this When philosophers talk about problems of consciousness, they are talking about figuring out how consciousness fits the substance world. Philosopher Galen Strawson believes that it is difficult to solve this problem because consciousness is inexplicable. - But we still do not understand the essence of the material world. Many people introduce philosophy through extreme skepticism related to Rene Descartes: can I dream now? Do you think that everything I know might be the product of some big fraud made by demonic devils? Today, many philosophers seem to think that radical skepticism is not worthy of our attention, but skeptical subjects remain, and for many people it remains as a worrisome problem I will. Philosopher Duncan Pritchard discusses the subject from his recent book "Understanding of Anxiety: Fundamental Skepticism and Unfounded Beliefs" The question of consciousness is what is consciousness and why are we more conscious than philosophical zombies? Adjective "difficult" contrasts with "simple" consciousness problem which tries to explain the mechanism of consciousness ("why" and "how" or ultimate cause and effective reason). The question of consciousness is to question whether all sensual beings have experienced a conscious experience rather than questioning the neurochemical constitution of life.

Montagne, Descartes, Pascal believe in the unpredictable best truth in universal social truth. Montaigne said that contradiction is not a contradiction of truth (Mengtian, p. 75). Do not believe that the possibility of lack of this truth contradiction is deemed skeptical - skepticism is for some reason and I do not want to believe anything. The same skepticism was interpreted by Descartes as falsehood of self-rebellion, and he said "I think, hence I am" (Descartes, p. 24). what? This question is a question in Plato's famous question "What is the truth?" The answer is "the word of God". The truth is that God is told. The reality is determined by the Creator God, and only the god of truth tells us that we can understand the truth. God did this with the words of the Bible truth. In this sense, the Bible is the only true philosophy book. Therefore, the foundation of the formation of Christian philosophy must be the word "Bible". Where? The only correct answer may be what God has said. Where? This is God's universe. This was created by God and we can understand creation only by believing what the Creator said. He did not elect to reveal everything about the universe, but what he revealed was truthful and satisfactory. For example, this helps to discuss the nature, nature, and supernatural issues of matter. "We have a double pattern of truth in the faith of God ... Some truth about God is beyond all the power of human reason. In fact, the philosopher is a natural reason for the light of light Under the guidance we are proving these truths about God, while the truth of finding or verifying information is the truth of discovery and verification of human information.The first type of truth is transcended rationality, And let's call the latter as the truth of natural reason. There are various ways to understand and access all the truth There is the truth. God is the ultimate truth. God is a greater truth than heaven. I believe that this is an effective religion if you believe in God the God, but do not speak about heaven at all and there is an organized religion that does not know anything about death. But if the same religion is afraid of death, I will say that this is an incomplete religion. You are an important part of the truth that will never die by death. There is only one god, one creator, one blissful existence. This is the most important element of the truth. God transcended time and space. But God is also in time and space. God does not belong to this universe, but God is in everywhere in this universe. God is invisible, but you can take that form if you wish. It is because everything is possible with God. He created the law of nature, but he created the reality itself, so he can freely change the reality.

Abstract of Nagarjuna's criticism (Vigrahavyavartani) summary: In the ninth section of Vigrahavyavartani, Nagarjuna claimed that he did not raise a proposition about the nature of reality (pratijna) to defend his skepticism. B. K. Matilal thinks that this position is not an unconvincing person for skeptics and uses Searle as a difference between the proposition model proposition and the word negation. Nagarjuna claims not to deny the philosophical position of its competitors, but merely denies the positive assertions that may be made by these positions, and refuses to do the assertion. Shunyata, or "emptiness", is the core concept of the Madhyaka school of Nagarjuna and is widely confirmed in the Prajñāpāramitā scripture. It summarizes the origins of important Buddhist teachings, especially analysis and dependence, to refute the metaphysics of Sarvastivada and Sautrāntika (a non-traditional school of extinction). Not all living things have an atom, but because all phenomena (Dharma) do not have svabhava (literally meaning "natural" or "self-owned"), the potential essence is also independent of "sky" There is no. The heresy theory of Bawa was rebutted based on early Buddhist teachings Abstract of Nagarjuna's criticism (Vigrahavyavartani) summary: In the ninth section of Vigrahavyavartani, Nagarjuna claimed that he did not raise a proposition about the nature of reality (pratijna) to defend his skepticism. B. K. Matilal thinks that this position is not an unconvincing person for skeptics and uses Searle as a difference between the proposition model proposition and the word negation. On the contrary, they support the view that there is no clear sign that there is a difference between illness and health, but at the most it is only a subjective feeling. Continuing, what Graham thinks about realism needs to refute opinions that attempt to purify mental disorders as purification and neurological problems.

Does he take charge of breaking the law if a person predicts that his actions could violate his actions against the law? In legal theory and ethical theory, this vision is enough to take responsibility as people have long accepted the principle of responsibility for such people. But in recent years, both philosophers and lawyers have expressed concern about this principle. Common in old books is legitimate, (...) It refers to a series of views that seriously recognize that skepticism about moral responsibility, or more frequently moral responsibility skepticism, never will be morally specified in a specific but universal sense in humans . His behavior is responsible. This emotion is often distinguished by the basic desert concept and is defined as behavioral control that the agent truly deserves for criticism and praise. Some ethical skeptics are completely refusing the concept of this moral responsibility. Others believe that, although possible, our best philosophical and scientific theory about the world provides a powerful and compelling reason to question doubts about moral responsibility. Some philosophers do not distinguish between freedom and moral responsibility. More carefully, they tend to "go back" to the concept of freedom, starting with the concept of moral responsibility; the concept of freedom does not give independent content (apart from the analysis of moral responsibility). For such philosophers, "freedom" means any condition of choice or participation in a morally responsible way. It is not clear what people think about the word "free will". Perhaps the main feature in the history of philosophy is that it is like a free state of moral responsibility. Broadly speaking, the idea is that in order to be morally responsible for something, you must have some freedom at the appropriate time before you take responsible actions or results. The meaning of this freedom, whatever it is, calls it "free will". The existence of free will seem to be premised on the concept of moral responsibility. Most people will agree that they can not be morally responsible for what people can not act. Furthermore, moral praise and accusation, or compensation and punishment seems to be meaningful only under the assumption that the agent is morally responsible. (1) People have free will and their behavior is not determined by their circumstances, past experience, psychological and personality characteristics. Or, (2) There is no one who has no will, in that case no one morally responsible. This dilemma is a matter of moral responsibility.

Skepticism believes that there is no way to prove that things exist outside of us. As skeptics think that we can not distinguish between dreams and reality, I think the real thing is probably the creation of our thoughts, and we think that it is like the brain sitting in a big bucket It's simple. Let's connect to the machine to simulate the perfect performance in reality, let's live the "brain" in it 1 An excerpt from the same-name article "certificate of the outside world", GE I examined some responses to the skeptical challenges presented in Part 2. In particular, we saw four answers: (1) Descartes Cogito, (2) GE. "Proof" to Moore's outside world, (3) Dretsk denies cognitive closure, and (4) David Lewis's contextualism. After considering the strengths and weaknesses of these proposed solutions, we review the question whether skepticism is so bad or not and draw a conclusion. This course concludes with a discussion of why we have the concept of knowledge. If there is no concept of knowledge we are accustomed to, what kind of life will it be? Does this gap in our cognitive economy affect widespread or is our life as generic as that? In order to better understand if the concept is important or important, we will consider what kind of life can exist without knowledge of knowledge. Moore 's "evidence of the outside world" was created for the purpose of the soul, aimed at solving the "philosophical scandal" of Immanuel Kant. Obviously not enough for Kant and other philosophers. I believe the belief he said is true common sense, I believe in existence, and many other examples of congenital knowledge. A new approach to protect Moore's common sense is also evident in his most famous thesis, the proof of the outside world (Moore 1939). Here, after considerable effort to understand the meaning of "external object" as "there is something that is not dependent on our experience", Moore said that the perfect idea of ​​the existence of such objects in this way It can be proved that it can prove it. The hand is "a CS proposition with a common meaning, use it according to this meaning, and the hand to be examined is enough to prove that the proposition is true - on the other hand there is certainly a hand The hand is matter matter, and matter matter is according to the usual meaning of "physical object" is an external object

Changing the image of the young minister During the past 20 years, I did not like the young minister's term of office. "1,500 young pastors will leave the church every month because of moral failure, better reward, spiritual fatigue, or controversy in the church" (Krejcir 1). What is the cause? Do you have a question of commitment? Senior pastors do not believe them. Do they think that this job is bigger and farther to better ones? This article proves that the main reason for the short term of the young minister is church bureaucracy, skepticism of high-level pastor, trampling of stone thinking, complexity of Messianic, and shortage of budget . In Malaysia, young people in Putrajaya are defined as 18 years old and 25 years old under the new national youth policy. Sports Minister Datuk Seri Ahmad Shabery Cheek recently confirmed that the definition of young people changed from 18 years old to 25 years old from 18 years old to 40 years old according to international standards. The United Nations defines young people as 15 to 24 years old, but we define ordinary wealth as 15 to 29 years old. Among the other youth related issues, the World Youth Action Plan since 2000 revealed the priorities the government should give priority and what the government should provide for young people. Leisure activities are their top ten priority. This brings us literature on leisure activities, in which case it can be achieved by using clubhouse Changing the image of the young minister During the past 20 years, I do not like the young minister's average term of office. "1,500 young pastors will leave the church every month because of moral failure, better reward, spiritual fatigue, or controversy in the church" (Krejcir 1). What is the cause? Do you have a question of commitment? Senior pastors do not believe them. Do they think that this job is bigger and farther to better ones? This article proves that the main reason for the short term of the young minister is church bureaucracy, skepticism of high-level pastor, trampling of stone thinking, complexity of Messianic, and shortage of budget . When I was 16 years old, my Christian church in Antioch, California, was asked about my leadership at the Youth Council. If I live in this "lifestyle", the young gay minister, a young minister, thinks I can not be a good role model for other young people. At first I did not mind. As our youth minister has erotic poisoning I already know that he is a hypocrite. So, when I was asked to "chat" at the office of the Minister of Youth, I already settled on the type of our congregation. My leadership days have ended, and my belief in American Christianity has drastically decreased.

Huysmans de Esseintes obsessive skills, unique identity, to 'nature' in nature against De Esseintes, J.-K Huysmans against his family, religion and society Paris. He believes that this rejection of truth self is the development of personality, but in reality it is a kind of self from his reaction to the overly stimulated public. By decorating eccentricity in his house, he believes he can definitely escape from an ordinary person. Static and sacred symbolic style can not adapt to stories just like poetry. Joris-Karl Yuemansn's 1884 novel À rebours (English title: against nature or against cereals) explores the number of aesthetics of related themes and symbols. This novel rarely depicts the psychology of Des Esseintes, a biased and isolated anti hero. Oscar Wilde, which is influenced by the influential novel, influences mainly on his play Salome, Human's books after reading a book, the characters of the celebrities are damaged, and the "picture of Dorian Gray" It appeared Then there is a ghost of skepticism. Although Kuhn was a wonderful skepticism, like the de Esseintes, the anti-hero "against nature" Joris-Carl Yuemans 1884 novel ("These skeptics wish to believe that the Lord has mercy on charges of Christians 2) He believes something at the same time trying to destroy it. He has doubts about his childhood suspicions. Do not you know if the world really exists? Are we a fictitious artifact of someone's imagination and some hell computer programs like Philip K. Dick's novel "The Matrix" (1999)? Might be so. Why? But, on the other hand, do not we strongly like realism? Patrol the real world. Let's discuss with authority. The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophical realism is defined as the existence of faith, "the concept of the program above, since it is language practice independent of anyone's faith." 3 Chair, table, carpet In the later stages of the story, Sir Henry lent the book of Durian. This is an anonymous French novel recognized by J. K. Hyysmans as "opposite property". This book is often described as "toxicity" ("Daily Chronicle," critic used as it is often mentioned in the book, "multi-disciplinary ritual sixth year published" Bible ", French apocalyptic Nickname considered as literature) Wild own novel). This is repeated "... art, it does not affect the action to resolve the desire for action that is highly sterilized": Huntsman's book "poison" is claimed, his life At the end of the day, Dorian himself, Lord Henry replied Wilde's assertion about the moral separation associated with the "action" field comes from the art. Indeed, a considerable part of Durian's life imitates the lifestyle that is consciously stated in "confrontation with nature" and promises to taste.

We live in an era when everyone is looking for reasons to believe something. Posters and advertisements say that "only prayer can save the United States." If prayer can save us, only one question needs to be answered. Who is praying? What are we praying for? God is omnipotent, the creator of all things, without the world there is neither the world nor us. However, many people are wondering if he really exists. There are many philosophical thoughts in this world that God, Platonism, Naturalism, Aristotle, Realism, Empiricism, and Rationalism exist. . The truth about God can respond to observations (the empiricism) about the world through individuals through critique evaluation (rationalism) of the internal logic of different belief systems through human beings. Experience to discover (mysticism), or through combinations of these means? Discussion about finding these different ways of God's truth depends on our beliefs below. Establishment of theology to provide evidence that Christianity is the correct version of theology. Supporters of the majority of this approach argue that they always interpret them according to their own world view, so there is no need to present arguments from historical evidence until people accept theological view of the theology. There is some quote between rationalism and empathism, the use of skepticism in particular, the doubt that other ideas are reality, and the pattern of thinking leading to the truth or real nature of knowledge. However, this skepticism fundamentally opposes rationalism and empiricism. There are three important principles in rationalism: application of specific principles to infer the conclusions, the concepts born of our birth, the idea of ​​nature, that is, to determine the conclusion I am using logic

For thousands of years, philosophers and theologians have opposed the existence of God. From my point of view, atheists are attacking the theologians and they desire to challenge the existence of God so that they can find some comfort in the dark outlook of human existence It seems. Frankly atheist Mikhovsky wrote an article titled "as an atheist" and he tried to argue and argue three discussions that he believes will convince many believers who believe in the existence of God There. In this article, Ryan Stringer criticizes the reaction to evil atheism, known as "skepticism". He first developed a simple atheistic argument from evil and then simply proved its two premises. Then he defended the potential reaction to skeptics. First, he argues that skepticism is inherently unbelievable, brings the result, it makes it unreasonable correspondence and indirectly defends his view. Secondly, he directly defended his argument by proposing arguments that support his second premise. Stringer concluded that skeptical theology would not destroy his argument. Last week I officially landed on the Internet and became one out of 8% of Americans. In my post, he was called an "atheist or agnostic" hard "to be an atheist." My friend had an unexpected and effective response. Some of them did not tell me for years. It is powerful and moving, I notice that we have quietly lived together, and imagine that we are alone in the formation of this doubt and doubt. When we explore the commonalities we experience, we are shocked that other people are already feeling our pain, and I think that why "after-Christian atheism" is secular I am wondering whether it will not be discussed in culture. If I can get guidance on tentative Christian beliefs: "What do you expect when you go backwards" or some useful tutorial, it will be of great help to me. I noticed that the general nature of the atheist 's reaction to this article is a regrettable misunderstanding for my purpose. Most people seem to think of a comprehensive Christian who apologizes for atheism, or at least think about the unbearable evidence of Christianity. This is not a vision. For the sake of clarity, this article aims to clarify why the following atheists (or rather arguing) could not achieve their goals when discussing with Christians. There are many arguments against Christianity, but this article is about the most popular discussion, not about the most popular discussion.

Participants in the discussion on "ontology commitment" will benefit from the way to distinguish the concepts of two different understandings. If the question in question is "what is theory" or "what is theory", we are considering a "clear" commitment. When asking about the theoretical cost or the preconditions of the theoretical truth, I will search, "promised" implicitly ". I defended the concept of ontological commitment as an implicit promise and developed and defended the concept that quantitative idioms that are not explicitly promised implicitly are in natural language. Standard of ontological commitment: In what we consider to be a true (simple) sentence, we can do explanatory commitments (not explain) through singular terms and exist in a sense that they exist There is an ontological commitment in statements that are in quantifiers (existentialists), but such statements do not use predicates. Participants in the discussion on "ontology commitment" will benefit from the way to distinguish the concepts of two different understandings. If the question in question is "what is theory" or "what is theory", we are considering a "clear" commitment. When asking about the theoretical cost or the preconditions of the theoretical truth, I will search, "promised" implicitly ". I defended the concept of ontological commitment as an implicit promise; I have also developed and defended it Timmons distinguish meta ethics from normative ethics and distinguish epistemological elements of meta ethics from its semantic and ontological elements. Then he motivates his commitment to methodological and ontological naturalism and attempts to link this commitment to various meta positions (and their constituent epistemology). Zimmerman discusses various arguments of moral skepticism and various non-skepticism of morality and divides the latter into rationalism and empiricism. According to Zimmerman, people can deduce from "yes" directly "should" without the help of intuition and cognitive "seeing". An understanding of the general principles of undertaking these inferences or verifying their credibility is gained by imagination and emotion. experience

Before I start, I need to pay attention to the various positions of human freedom issues. In "freedom and self of human beings", Roderick M. Tizam adopted a liberalist position adjacent to nonconformity theory. Liberalists believe in free will and recognize that freedom and determinism are incompatible. Determinists also follow the principle of nonconformity, but according to Tizzam's words they believe that all the events involved in action are caused by other events. Chishamutizamu started writing a paper saying "In my opinion, the standard problem is one of the most difficult problems among all problems of philosophy" (Chisholm, 77). He tried to divide the standard view into three parts: methodology, expertise, and skepticism. His reasoning is irregular, so the arguments for tisesm skepticism and expert advocacy are wrong. - ... The four hypotheses are ... ... subjects exposed to aggressive models will reproduce aggressive behaviors similar to models ... "," ... ". Subjects mimic the behavior of homosexual models. This is greater than the model's heterosexual ... "," ... Observation of non-aggressive models brings extensive suppression effects on subsequent subject behavior. ... ... "And" ... boys tend to mimic aggression over girls ... " Over 30 years, Tizam has developed and redefined Brentano's paper. Perhaps the most insightful argument about his view and their connection can be found in David Sanford's Thesis of Chrentin on Brentano. In response to this article, Tizzam said: "Anyone who wants to understand what I did when setting the intent standards should read the Sanford paper" (215). Thizham's paper "Through the Potential World Identity: Some Problems" is a major article on the first issue of the 1967 Noûs new problem. In that article, Chisholm proposed a discussion that led to much of discussion and discussion. A variant of this discussion was presented in Tizzam's "The Essential Part of their Whole Body" that was Chizham's Presidential Speech at the American Metaphysical Society in 1973. This article is closely related to Appendix B.

Mackie's Discussion on Objective Values ​​J. L. Mackie uses his brief statement to open his article "subjectivity of value" as "no objective value" and clarifies its position. McGee recently believes that it is necessary for him to strictly define the boundary of his position and concern as the dialogue in moral philosophy has been found to be full of misunderstanding and confusion of various moral positions I will. Hence, his article has two main parts: First, Mackie defines the nature of his moral skepticism and, secondly, he is a part of the moral realism through a series of arguments We will keep his position by showing low reliability. Summary: As we all know, J. L. McKee is famous for having no objective values. I will investigate the explanation of what the objective value of Mackie actually is and then try to examine and understand his argument against these entities. Specifically, I would like to see if his argument applies to Kant's objective values. Therefore, this conversation is also Kant's explanation and Mackie's explanation (at least when I understand them). Mackie believes objective values ​​(if any) have strange causal relationships. Specifically, these entities have the ability to make objects recognize their motives (whatever it means, comply with their recommendations). Is this power strange in metaphysics? "With objective values, they are very strange entities or relationships that are quite different from the rest of the universe" (38). What is strange about them? Maggie said that Plato's form (in this case, the unnatural features of Moore) will give us a "dramatic picture" that shows what objective value is. It is such a form of good, that knowledge is offered. Intellectuals have both direction and overwhelming motivation; some good things will pursue it and tell people who know this to make him pursue it. Everyone who is familiar with it is not due to the accidental fact that this person or everyone constitutes the result he wishes, but it is not objective just because the result has to be established in some way I will ask you. enter J. L. Mackie keeps moral skepticism with three specific arguments. His first argument came from cultural relativism. Maggie saw the problem that what we call objective moral belief does not seem to shape our culture. Instead, our culture seems to form our particular moral beliefs like monogamy. Therefore, moral subjectivity is the most rational explanation for our moral beliefs to imitate our culture. His second argument for moral realism is that there is something strange or counterintuitive in the description of the objective moral field that someone may give. There are three differences in this discussion. First of all, there are metaphysical questions, or questions based on the strange state of mind advocated by realists. For McGee, the weirdness of this field is a debate over it. Second, since it is not clear how this field relates to natural objects and human behavior, there is a relationship problem.

That's all. This is the moment he is waiting for. A moment that strengthens the hard coat in green and shows his true achievement to all. It is his opportunity to prove his skepticism is wrong and proud parents. Beautiful green trees with bright summer weather and backgrounds welcome Max to the stadium. He slowly walked toward the court with a new picture line. The only thing that separates him from his opponent is the net, and it looks as high as ever. Somehow, Max felt claustrophobia and surrounded him around the enclosure of the tennis court. A splendid headlight tore the darkness of the night. The moment of hope came at the moment he was waiting for days. He took his goal, walked his fate - ...... knocking on his door train human race, suddenly forgot his grandfather's "phantom" He saw running, I made a new decision Train That's all. This is the moment he is waiting for. A moment that strengthens the hard coat in green and shows his true achievement to all. It is his opportunity to prove his skepticism is wrong and proud parents. Beautiful green trees with wonderful summer weather and background greet Max into the Court. He slowly walked towards the court with a slow line, and he looked quieter than it actually was. - The most dramatic moment of competitiveness, the world seems to be darkening the end of the tunnel, as the world becomes more technical, the writing seems more shadows, there is no word. The wonderful idea of ​​traveling the earth and the talents they shared were forgotten. Before abolishing the past, they should remind themselves that the tools created to write are good for everyday life. Mighty understood that this is the moment he was waiting since he was a child. He will be remembered until the end of the world, and if he does, he will think about something. He decided a few things, and now he is in a hurry to the part of human weapons, leaving other viruses. He does not want to let go of this opportunity. After this, the Variola community decided to stop attacking humans in commemoration of Mighty's sacrifice. Slowly, for decades the tradition that led to smallpox has ended forever. There are some Tianyu young people who are singing a brave, brave and noble story of Mighty when 2015 is still at the cutting edge of the world.

In 1995, seven-year trade negotiations between the Labor Party and the World Trade Organization (WTO) finally brought up the World Trade Organization (WTO), and the American worker movement was one of its major skepticism . Labor supporters believe that the World Trade Organization only accelerates the impact on freer faction by excluding domestic regulations. It will be more difficult to overwhelm the country's efforts to defend the standard of living and the ability of labor unions to fight for wages and health and safety laws and to protect workers' rights to join trade unions. The World Trade Organization (WTO) is an international organization that negotiates and enforces trade rules among member countries. The purpose of the WTO is to implement existing trade rules, to provide importers and exporters with a predictable trading environment, and to negotiate agreements to open world trade of goods and services with Member States is. There are 164 member countries in the WTO, accounting for over 96% of world trade. Decisions are made by all members, usually by consensus. In 1995 trade negotiations for seven years finally brought up the World Trade Organization (WTO), and the American worker movement was one of its major skepticism. Labor supporters believe that the World Trade Organization only accelerates the impact on freer faction by excluding domestic regulations. It will be more difficult to overwhelm the country's efforts to live standards and the ability of labor unions to fight for wages and safety and health laws and defend the rights of workers who join labor unions. The Labor Party lobbying the WTO Immediately after the WTO was founded in 1995, the ILO was asked to develop a plan to incorporate labor rights into WTO trade regulations. The draft provoked intense controversy that it never saw the light. Even now, few people have seen it. Despite the reappearance of contacts during the second year of the WTO review, this experience has led the organization to become reluctant to take this terrain unless its task is clearer.

"The human brain starts working from the moment you were born until you stand up and speak in public." - (George Jessier) People try to elucidate the brain and what is going on inside This is what the philosopher is trying to achieve today, but you can ask a question. Why do I have to dissect the brain? This problem occurs because the philosopher really wants to know what is happening in the human brain. This can also be traced back to "knowing" and believing what can be proved fact. The philosophy of Immanual Kant (1724-1804), the most influential philosopher since Aristotle, is an attempt to answer the skeptical philosophy of David Hume (1711-1776). According to Hume there is no reason to believe the causal relationship; for example, just because an object seems to have a law of gravity that always causes objects of the past to fall to the ground, the object will not change at such next gravity law There is no reason to believe it to follow. Kant agreed that Hume agreed that he could not understand how something behaves in the real world or the real world. But Kant adds new wrinkles. He thinks that each person's mind builds up a subjective world and that this subjective world is the world that each of us "knows". The opposite of causal reductionism and causal skepticism is a new tradition of rest. It began with Norman Kemp Smith's "David Hume's Philosophy" and defended Hume as a causal realist's viewpoint. In this way we deny the causality reduction theory and causality skepticism. - Causal relationships are known in principle. (Tooley 1987: 246-47) Considering the above explanation, Humean's causal realism is least intuitive, so it needs the most explanation. However, this position can be made more reasonable by introducing three explanatory tools that seem to require proper use to persuade the realistic interpretation. Two of them argue that Hume is respected in important respects, but it is a description of a realist who claims that unrealistic interpretation is often denied.

Skepticism of excessive doubt: Ray tract lease of Raymond Jean When I started a novel or poetry class, I always talked about various objectives of literature. I told my students that avoiding literature is a good way to temporarily forget our problem (not dangerous than drugs, alcohol, inadvertent sex or driving), escape from literature It is harmful to escape the success and love affair of the novel. The theory of credibility has led to the concept of "interrupting suspicion" or "willing to suspend suspicions", a term made by Samuel Taylor Coleridge in 1817. If a writer can satisfy his work with "the truth of human interests and appearance", the reader believes that they are willing to postpone or postpone their judgment on the suspicion of the story. In his biography literature, Colleric said. The real appearance is enough to make the shadow of these imaginations temporarily unbelievable, it constitutes a poetic belief. Skepticism of excessive doubt: Ray tract lease of Raymond Jean When I started a novel or poetry class, I always talked about various objectives of literature. I told my students that avoiding literature is a good way to temporarily forget our problem (not dangerous than drugs, alcohol, inadvertent sex or driving), escape from literature May be harmful, successful, or romantic. Specifically, it is defined as "ability to identify and record cases of crime and non-crime" (Boivin & Cordeau, 2011). Every police has prudent discretion when using their own power, power, persuasiveness, or power. The discretion of the staff depends on how the staff think about their responsibilities to society. Discretion can lead to selective enforcement and may lead to discrimination against a group of selected people or selected individuals (Young, 2011)

"Because no one has ever doubted it, things have never been proved, so skepticism is the first step to the truth ..." Knowledge on the problem of Dennis Diderot's problem, " Skeptics "It is a knowledge proposition for those who need clear definitions, logical consistency, adequacy of evidence, and are trying to cast doubts on someone. In order to approach "the religion" which is the first field of knowledge, we evaluate the estimated "truth" using the method of rational, emotional and authoritarian knowledge, thereby eliminating skepticism Have to. Knowledge problem The problem of knowledge is a problem directly related to our understanding of ourselves, ourselves, and other people, related to knowledge acquisition, retrieval, creation, formation and acceptance doing. These questions are designed to explore and explore not only the problem but also the advantages of exploring knowledge. Students sometimes ignore the positive value of different kinds of knowledge, and the discriminatory power of the methods used to search for knowledge and to determine its effectiveness. As well as being able to identify constraints related to uncertainty, methodological bias, or knowledge, knowledge, and knowledge, the problem of knowledge is how knowledge is transformed into how benefits, gifts, happiness, and the basis of further thought and action It becomes clear whether it becomes. Verification of knowledge in various fields and rationale In order to properly handle the problem of many knowledge it is always expected that these aspects are related and these aspects can be interlaced in different, equally relevant ways. For this reason, knowledge problem handling can be distinguished from other problems that may occur in a particular field. For example, perceptual perception is not a TOK process of knowledge problems viewed from the viewpoint of perceptual psychology or biology. Let's think about the problem of knowledge raised by this statement in two knowledge fields. Knowledge can be defined as a reasonable and true belief. It is also a subjective belief that depends on personal viewpoint, cultural background, and education system. In the above sentence, the word "sometimes" plays a very important role. The assertion of knowledge gained today is not necessarily so, so it may be abandoned tomorrow.

Some of our team's managers, educators, and medical professionals recommend a strange book that teaches skepticism, atheism, and philosophy of a new era. Because this report is persuasive, even if these concepts and their reasoning code words appear in your area, you will not be ignorant. This may change a very exciting and magical life. But this is a new kind of Oriental mysticism. Our team has priests and medical professionals claiming that these books change people's lives. When I experienced severe depression last year, I read all possible articles on brain science and psychology. Not only that, I have read "A road less travel" by practicing psychotherapist M. Scott Peck and "The Brain - The Story of the Story". I also took a very interesting psychology course at Yale University. I may appreciate it later, but I can not confirm that it will be a good reading when I write. In fact, I can never release it. That is why my brain wants to avoid it. Just like anything else you need to do a lot of work before getting important results I have read this reminder, and I do not complain about road uncertainty. No one can complain - the boss does not confirm your work. Confirmation must be done from an internal information source. The way you have to walk must be defined by yourself This is the most important thing. "There is a chance to hesitate and retreat before a person promises, there is a basic fact about all the initiatives (and creation) that ignorance kills countless ideas and excellent plans. A series of events of encourage unexpected events, we can not do anything we can and we can not dream of what we can do, meetings and physical aid, let's be bold with talent, strength and magic. Let's get started right now. "

Nihilism - primitive writing nihilism is a philosophical position, meaning that human beings have no meaning, purpose, understandable truth or essential value, in particular. More common is the assertion of a specific idea, not the place of someone's general subscription. Movements such as Dada, demolition, punk / black metal / death metal / metal / goth are expressed as "beautiful" by various observers. Nihilism is also a feature attributed to the period. For example, Bauriya claims that postmodernity is the age of nihilism asserted by some Christian theologians and authorities Nihilism (from the Latin nil language, "no") was a philosophical and epistemological skepticism originally emerging in the early age of Emperor Alexander II in Russia in the 19th century. Friedrich Nietzsche uses this term to explain the collapse of traditional morals in Western society. In the 20th century, nihilism covers a variety of philosophical and aesthetic positions, in a sense denying the existence of true moral truth or value, denying the possibility of knowledge or communication, life eventually I insisted it was pointless. Neither the purpose nor the universe "Niger rhythm is standing at the door," Nietzsche wrote. "Is this the most wonderful day for all guests?" This year was 1885 or 1886, Nietzsche was writing a notebook not intended to publish its contents. Discussion about nihilism - what is most important in our most basic commitment, or differentiated and valuable life is that the world is an abyss of meaning rather than the meaning of protection given by God. There is no ongoing treatment for the work that is supposed to be published in life. But a few years ago in 1882, German philosophers published a possible answer to the problem of the ultimate source of nihilism. "God is dead," Nietzsche is writing in a famous "Gay Science" passage. "God is still dead, we killed him."

Descartes, Plato and Hume's Thought A direct starting point for Plato's philosophical speculation is the teaching of Socrates. When Socrates tried to define the term of knowledge to refute skepticism of refinement, he taught that the only true knowledge is to acquire knowledge through concepts. He said that this concept represents all the reality of one thing. As Socrates uses, this is only a principle of knowledge. Plato regards it as the existence principle. "If this concept represents all the reality of things, reality needs to be in an ideal order, not necessarily things themselves, but on them, in one world" (Chaput, C . This article explains the similarities and differences between Rene Descartes and John Locke, David Hume and Plato. They each believe in rationalism or empiricism. In contrast to experience, rationalists think that a series of important basic concepts are intuitively and intuitively known. For rationalists, is knowledge born? From information sources such as sensation. They are known as Descartes, Plato. Experiors believe that all conception followers eventually return to experiences such as perception and emotion. What? There are no ideas or concepts without impressions or emotions. What? David Hume and Rene Descartes are philosophers who oppose the origins of ideas. Descartes believes in three types of ideas, namely birth, coincidence, and imagination. He said that God existed because of his existence, and from his thoughts on what is perfect like God. Meanwhile, Hume believes that the idea comes from one impression, an impression. Both theories have advantages and disadvantages, but I prefer Hume's theory over Descartes. Descartes believes that imagination does not help humans. Descartes' definition of thinking exists in thought, only things that represent others are called thinking. His argument is that the essence of thought that constitutes the heart can get God's idea, but on the contrary, humans can think about God in other ways. One of the main advantages of Descartes is his view of objective reality, which is a reality view. This idea can be explained in two ways. Classical philosophers such as Plato, Aristotle, Spinoza, Descartes, Hobbes, Hume, Rock, and others all understand emotions as the first concept to understand emotions without constituent elements. He believes that scientific psychology should stop thinking of emotions as 'an eternal and sacred spiritual entity like old and invariable species in natural history' (James 1890: 449). James's proposal is often called James Lange's theory and is similar to the theory provided by Lange (1885) that emotions are a perception sense of autonomy and changes in physiological conditions associated with exercise . Functions For example, when we think that we are in danger, this perception directly causes a series of physical reactions, and our understanding of these responses constitutes fear.

"Birthmark" - a psychological short story Nathaniel Hawthorne's "born birthmark" is a "psychological" short story in which the theme and method draw a character, so a psychoanalyst is required to interpret correctly It may be. Show these claims. Henry Seidel Camby talks about the value of "literary psychology" by Hawthorne "Skepticism is incompatible with his time and past". This unconscious generation (1950s) laughs at Hawthorne Torture yourself on the way of adultery, afflicted the soul, telling themselves that any psychoanalyst can fail with this exclusion eliminated this moral I will (emphasize so). "Newborn Bathmark" is the psychological dimension of Nathaniel Hawthorne, the typical representative of his best short story, and well documented in his story "The Bathmark" It is being made. Frederick C. Cruise discusses "a general psychological drama in Hawthorne 's short story" in the "funeral executive logic of Roger Malvern". The indispensable nature, I should also explain the priority of Chinese psychological drama in Hawthorn novel. "Birthmark" - a psychological short story Nathaniel Hawthorne's "born birthmark" is a "psychological" short story with its theme and method depicting a character, so a psychoanalyst is necessary for correct interpretation May show these claims. Henry Seidel Camby talks about the value of Hawthorne's "literary psychology" in "Skeptics who are incompatible with his time and past". They are a crime of adultery and have tortured people trapped by commitment to morality (so assume that any excellent psychoanalyst can delete it). In Nathanial Hawthorne's short story "The birthmark" he tells stories about scientists who think he is more creative and skilled than Mother Nature and his wife, Georgiana. In short stories, for the sake of some examples and examples in the story, the birth of Georgiana represents her soul. There are several things in the story that suggest that her soul is related to her birth spot. For example, Elmer's behavior against Georgian, actions and feelings of other people against her, emotions against Georgiana himself, and some references in stories. Hawthorn repeatedly expressed these ideas.

Canadian writer W.O. Mitchell is fascinated by the meaning of life. Whether it is a result of growing during depression or simply as a result of Mitchell's deep philosophical thinking, this theme will continue to appear in his work. Looking at his classic "Who are wind" of his humor, The Black Bonspiel and eloquent children of Wullie MacCrimmon, Mitchell solves this ancient problem with elegance, humor and caution. In addition to paying attention to the details of the existence of human beings, Mitchell evokes the role of Canada in his research and continues to create literature based on that country. A controversy about the existence of God and the meaning of life occurred in a black boring long-standing apartment behind a strange street. The direction of the opening ceremony pointed out that "there are strange lock and lever combinations on the corridor door" (3). This "boutique collection" symbolically preserves the white nihilistic vision - Deadly Sunset Co. -. Black's door was locked until the end of the game, but then White forced him to cancel "Chachacha and Mouse" like a ghost of Jacob Marley. White passed through a sill that opened without shadow of bondage and entered his "night in the sky". Black stands at the door and looks after him (141). Desperately, he failed to rescue Caucasians from suicide, and Black instinctively relied on God in prayer: Since there are two things, it is important to know the existence of God and the nature of his existence. First, the existence of God is related to the meaning of life. Second, the existence of God will enable humans to develop lifestyles that produce best results. This means that if the existence of God can be determined, the creation of law, justice and human society can be easily accomplished. This is possible, of course, only when people think that God exists first and then there is only one God. It is important to agree that he is a good person if there is a god. God is life. God is the truth. Life itself is a god. Life and consciousness is one. Life, existence, consciousness, existence are the same. A conscious place has life, existence, existence. May experience life, existence, existence, consciousness, revolution ... This is erroneously called death, but it is not death in reality is not death. It is the essence of Jesus' highest proof and proves to the world of skepticism that Jesus is the essence of the highest proof, the Crown, most publicly tolerate the so-called so-called death, life is immortal, and will continue to change even after passing away. Or so-called death. He experienced a transformation that can be seen in the biblical statement that he walked with Esau with the two disciples, and they did not acknowledge him. Later, they admitted to him, not for his shape but for what he told them.

To explore the identity and time here Arundel's tomb and Whitsunday's wedding Lajin has been criticized for his poetry for years. What Kim is doing is not always writing the truth or depth of my own feelings. There are voices to many people to convince their persuasive that they are usually exploring themselves as they are usually very visible, but only to reveal the surface. Why did he try to convince himself that real feelings represent the true challenge and profoundness of Lajin's poems? Candidates and Pentecostal weddings use marriage as a social norm and process, and most people marry in the same way without doubt. Birthday gifts are considered marital affairs owned by Ted Hughes (husband of Plath). The tomb of Arundel explored the potential distortion of the relationship between Earl and Earl of the 16 th century; it also explored the devastating impact of time on relations. Although the applicant explained marriage as an enrollment process (seems like a job interview), Larkin used the Pentecostal wedding as a means of recording the relationship, or rather the marriage he witnessed. In The Whitsun Weddings, Philip Larkin presented the reader a ruthless explanation of the British life after the Second World War. Larkin is an outstanding writer of sports and the Pentecostal wedding is a collection of skepticism about Harold Macmillan 's "consumer culture" in the UK. This series thoroughly explores the shortness of human life, the negligence of social expectation, and the negligence of consumerism. In "Dockery and Son", a middle-aged main character was shown to the reader, while reviewing his alma mater, "I lived at the door: / lock" was about to be opened. A locked door means a discontinuance that is impossible and a disconnection that he feels as a life before the student. The use of Larkin 's gift helps to emphasize the break between the hero and his past. The short-term nature of human life is totally opposite to the eternal nature of the hero's world.

Keynote lecture: "Great Awakening Between the 1730s and the 1740s" - Speech: The first big awakening (sometimes a big awakening) or the revival of evangelism was a series of Christian Renaissance that struck the British and the 13 colonies of the 1730s and the 1740s. As the believers strive to renew their personal beliefs and religious beliefs, the resurrection movement has permanently influenced Protestantism. A big awakening shows that the English-American gospel evangelist appeared as a sectarian movement within the Protestant church. In America, the term arousal is most commonly used, in the UK it is called the resurrection of evangelism. Historians said that the first awakening in the 1730s and the 1740s and the second awakening in the third wake up from the late 1950s to early 20th century. These Renaissance were part of the big romantic religious movement that struck mainly in Europe, mainly England, Scotland, and Germany. Just like the first big awakening half a century ago, the second reflection of romanticism is characterized by passion, emotion and charm to supernaturalism. It rejected skepticism, faith, and rationalism left behind from enlightenment. Almost at the same time, similar movements also flourished in Europe. Pietism swept the German countries. Evangelism in the UK is very strong Edwards was part of the first big awakening that hit New England and other areas in the 1730s and 1740s. Puritan felt that the religious beliefs of people faded and great arousal tried to awaken people's beliefs about God's possibility to determine fate. In the meantime, most sermons were intense sermons, designed to evoke the faith of the audience and turn it into a personal devotion to Christ. "So this is not because God does not notice their evil, not because they do not resent it, he will not cut off his hands and they will not cut them out. Bad, their curse can not sleep, the pit is ready, the fire is ready, the stove is hot now, ready to receive them, the fire is now angry and shining. And the hole opened her mouth under them. " From what point of view is Jonathan Edwards's "sinner in the hand of angry god" written? What is the overall effect?

A famous doctor in London and Uterson was formerly one of Jikil's best friends. As an expression of rationalism, materialism, and skepticism, Lanyon provides a foil for Jekyll 's mysticism (its attitude and emotion is a totally contrasting role with other personality). His death represents a more general victory of materialism at Dr. Jekyll and Hydite. Excellent lawyers are highly appreciated in the London community. Utterson is conservative, dignified and even imaginative, but he seems to have sneaky curiosity about the dirtier aspects of life. However, his rationalism prevented him from dealing with the supernatural nature of Jekyll-Hyde's relationship. Utterson is not a scientist, but his friend Lanyon (probably the Victorian society) is a denial of his loyalty and supernaturality to a reasonable interpretation. He wants only to separate his potion, purify all its elements and make the dark side a reality - Hyde will appear, but he does not have an opponent like an angel. Once released, Hyde took over slowly until Jekyll no longer existed. People would want to know what will happen to "angels" at the end of the novel if people are half angels and half devils. According to a remark that does not appear in the word of his overwhelming observer, Hyde is covered with fur, shrinking and shrinking, unpleasant ugliness and distortion. His ugly bodies and malformations symbolize his moral ugliness and distorted morality. In fact, for the spectators in the Stevenson era, the relationship between this ugliness and the evil of Hyde may be considered more than symbolic one. Many people believe in topography and believe that people can identify criminals through their appearance. In addition, the small figures of Hyde may represent the fact that like Jekyll 's dark side he has been oppressed for years and can not grow and prosper. His fluff is likely to indicate that he is not the bad aspect of Jekyll, but the incarnation of the animal nucleus Jekyll under the refined appearance of Jekyll. Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde's hearing impaired Mr. Hyde Dr. Jekyll and Dr. Hyde experienced transformation, transcendence, and illegal era in the strange case of Hide. When Dr. Jekyll was Mr. Hyde, Hyde influenced the lives of several characters in Stevenson's story. In the process of imagining Hyde, the reader was shocked by the amazing performance of Hyde in the physical description. - Schizophrenia and Dr. Jekyll and Hyde's strange case The name of schizophrenia comes from "schizophrenia". "The kidney where the diaphragm is located, the structure that is dominated by the sacral nerve, Greeks believe that the area of ​​the face is the place of thought, or at least the place of emotion (Berle 12) Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde's strange incident was the first Gothic novel published by Scottish author Robert Louis Stevenson in 1886. This work is also known as Dr. Jekyll and Hyde, Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde's strange case, or simply Jekyll & Hyde. This is about London 's lawyer, Gabriel John Utterson, who investigated the strange event between his old friend, Dr. Henry Jekyll and evil Edward Hyde. The influence of the novel is ... More

Ancient Greece was the birthplace of philosophy, especially the city state of Athens. Father of Socrates philosophy was born here. Two great men who took over him, Plato and Aristotle teach here. The philosophy created by these three people is well-known, but a different school was born in Athens. This philosophy is rarely known among contemporary people, but it also has an impact: stoicism. In the 3 rd century of ancient Greece, three major philosophical schools were born - epicurenism, skepticism, stoicism. In any case, stoicism is not a new philosophy. It dates back to the era of ancient Rome and Greece where philosophers Seneca, Marcus Aurelius and Epitectus lived. However, Ryan Holiday successfully regained these concepts and reused them in the modern world to make these concepts accessible. This record is also the author of Tim Ferris and Lewis Howes. Their podcasts, their own books, Titan tools, and wonderful universities are the culmination of strategies and concepts used by various industry elites. This is a unique skill, you need to plan and display the best works. It will be hard to improve the classics, as it will improve oneself. Most of Peterson's life principle seems to come directly from the Stoic manual. Stoichism is the philosophy of life born in ancient Greece and Rome, emphasizing reasons, character, discipline, and courage. It believes that people are holding their heads for the first time. External events do not belong to our role, so we can not think of good or bad things. Like the correct idea of ​​Buddhism, it always insists that it is conscious of it and is not impulsive Instead of reading Jordan Peterson's "12 Rules in Life", you should read 12 books (or watch his YouTube speech). I would like to learn more about stoicism, an advanced ancient philosophy that found many believers in ancient Rome. Although stoicism can go back, it should provide a good life for the people of the 21st century. Even after reading this book for six months, I still remember that I take a strong takeout and use it in my daily life. It comes from a stubborn philosopher Epitectus. It is this concept that we can use everything in life to divide everything in life. With our power, not our power. Please make the most of everything that happens in your life. The unfortunate thing that happens to you is not your power, but the way you respond to it. Instead, you can consider the ability to change things according to the situation, otherwise do not waste your time. Okay, this is a really simple explanation. I wanted to read more about Epitectus' s life and bought his book Enchiridion in 2018.

Sensation: Experiencing the reality of the world In 1999, modern American philosopher Hilary Putnam created a huge movie called the Matrix. This movie was made to explain Putnam's view on skepticism and social reality. Putnam suggested an idea that if it is true, we can completely change and destroy human thoughts. Thinking experiments behind the movie include the cutting of all nerves that our brain is connected to the sensory input connected to the supercomputer. Stereotype matrix in the movie The purpose of this article is to reveal some of the stereotypes present in the movie 'Matrix' by Andy and Larry Wachowski director. To achieve this, the matrix is ​​considered a rebellious movie, but it contains several stereotypes. We will also see African-American characters in the "Matrix" (Oracle, Tank, Bulldozer, Morpheus). But today's society is full of stereotypes and prejudices against certain ethnic groups. This is evident in all aspects of our lives, including media, culture and legal system. The police are there to protect and serve the community. Due to the racial characterization, the police seem to be isolated, hampering service to all communities This report is based on Matrix movies. "Matrix" movie is a film of science fiction released in the United States on March 31, 1999. This film is written and supervised by Larry and Andy Wakovsky. This movie is the first part of the Matrix series and even movies are not part of a cartoon book. , Video games, animation. The meaning of the matrix is ​​an array of rectangles of the matrix. In this movie, it shows two different kinds of life, one is computer-generated world "dream world", the other is reality, but every human living in a dream is programmed I know, and I know. In this movie, "Neo" is a hero, he is a computer programmer, and he is caught up in the revolt against the machine. But first, he wants to know "What is a matrix?" Morpheus is the protagonist of the movie, he spends a lot of time looking for it in the matrix, and he helped others find it. He is the title of their space ship team, they call it Nebuchadnezzar.

Postmodern and Marxist postmoderns may be the most difficult to define at the moment. This is mainly due to the fact that we are still moving, political opinion, or economics (classify postmodern into the above definition of only those that defeated you). One of several things proved by experience is that it pays attention to culture. Jameson once thought postmodern was more culturally dominant than anything else (Storey, p. The solution to the problem of the paper is in Marxism, feminism, postmodern. Through postmodernism, I mean that these methods are put together under "decomposition" or "skeptical interpretation." Grouping these ideas under "Postmodern" is technically incorrect, but good or bad - this view (views related to Michel Foucault and Jacques Derrida) is usually. It is called. It is this analysis to see the world from the perspective of power relations. This analysis is often filled with the following satire. "Romance" is conceptualized. Derrida calls it "white myth" ... Postmodern and Marxist postmoderns may be the most difficult to define at the moment. This is mainly due to the fact that we are still moving, political opinion, or economics (classify postmodern into the above definition of only those that defeated you). One of several things proved by experience is that it pays attention to culture. Jameson thought that postmodern was like a cultural advantage over subjectivity. From the perspective of postmodern, the objective world can not be subjective, and vice versa (White & Haines, 2004: 206-207). According to theoretical postmodernism, there should be no further explanation about the reality. Therefore, the political view toward the world should not be better than others. Therefore postmoderns will eventually reject the need for a dominant social structure. This is not that I personally think that postmodernism and Marxism are balanced. It is obvious to me that those 'prominent grand stories suspected' being bragged are part of the postmodern 's view, which make such an alliance logically impossible. Postmoderns should be skeptical about Marxism as other normative belief systems. Therefore, such formal postmodern claims are radical skepticism. However, there is no way how this works in theory or practice at all. For example, Derrida and Foucault are mostly repent Marxists if they repent. They brought together the bourgeoisie of the 1960 's and the proletarian rhetoric about the identity politics that plagued us since the 1970' s. Foucault's basic implicit (usually clear) argument is a power relationship management society. This is a reinterpretation of assertions about Marxist eternal and class intertwining. Derrida's virtual concern for the marginal people reflects the same thing.

In today's world, society emphasizes the many values ​​of materialistic things. Whether it is the latest electronic equipment or the latest fashion trend, someone is buying it somewhere. This materialistic idea was evident during the holiday season, where thousands of shoppers stand out in the cold looking for the latest trend. However, social materialist ideology can be misunderstood as true self identity. In other words, society often defines his own value through what he owns, not his personality. The serious crisis of the human identity living in the lies, in turn, makes this life possible, and of course has a moral dimension, which seems to be a serious moral crisis, among other things in society. Those who are tempted by the consumer value system, their identity has been dispelled in the decoration of popular civilization, there is no fundamental order and no sense of responsibility for more than their existence. The human system depends on this moralization to deepen it, in fact it is a prediction of society. Europe is experiencing an identity crisis that European skepticism and the tendency to be free and authoritarian become increasingly common in Eastern Europe. In this case, society is willing to accept authoritarian regime in exchange for community and security. For several years, the EU prioritized Muslim immigrants and Syrian refugees. Immigration means change in every field of society. As a result, the country and its citizens may become overwhelmed by population and culture. The countries of Europe, especially the eastern countries are increasingly diversified, so the European citizens lose their identity and can no longer be relieved in their hometown. It is logical that people are dissatisfied with this situation because immigrants are a common policy and ordinary people do not say. Religion is also a very traditional and powerful social pillar that enhances the awareness of the community. This is a question that plagues the Icelandic and allows them to reevaluate their country and their identity. As a very wealthy country in a developed country, how does it face a recession for many years? How does the citizen react to the crisis, making people impossible to purchase houses and making it impossible to purchase the house they live in? In March 2009, during the crisis, New Yorker's Ian Parker noticed that Icelanders were asking simple questions. Smali McCarthy, co-founder of the Pirate Party and MP member, said in an interview: The conclusion is that there was a fundamental disruption within the Icelandic system that brought this up. For these Icelanders politicians betrayed these people and sold their country.

The rise of social innovation represents the innovation that we know and the dissatisfaction with the ability to bring about fair and sustainable results. However, as conceptual social innovation is known to be ambiguous, it is doubtful whether this concept provides some sort of real improvement or alternative. In this article I will send an invitation to capture social innovation as a cooperative concept. The conceptual framework shows collaboration rather than discussion and provides space for collaboration between various perspectives and participants. The collaborative concept framework welcomes and explains various uses. An important feature of social innovation as a cooperative concept is to promote new practices and make various contributions as part of progressive dialogue on social innovation, the concept of relevant assessment and evidence of policies and projects . This paper emphasizes the importance of analyzing the evaluation of multi-sector reorganization related to social innovation to follow its role in justice and sustainability, while reforming social innovation, taxonomy and transitional skepticism Identify the characteristic. Digital social innovation - or social collaborative innovation that innovators, users, and communities collaborate through digital technologies to create knowledge and solutions to meet a wide range of social needs, and that scale can not be imagined before it goes up . the Internet. A systematic review of existing scholarly literature and gray literature was done based on a four-step process. Detailed information on this process is provided as supplementary data due to space limitation Appendix 1 outlines the systematic design and procedures used, including the search database being used I will. An example of the data extraction tool is described in Supplementary Data Appendix 3. The rise of social innovation represents the innovation that we know and the dissatisfaction with the ability to bring about fair and sustainable results. However, as conceptual social innovation is known to be ambiguous, it is doubtful whether this concept provides some sort of real improvement or alternative. In this article I will send an invitation to capture social innovation as a cooperative concept. The conceptual framework shows collaboration rather than discussion and provides space for collaboration between various perspectives and participants. The collaborative concept framework welcomes and explains various uses. The main features of social innovation are designed to contribute to new practices and make various contributions part of the progressive dialogue of social innovation, the concept of relevant assessment, and evidence of policy and project It is a joint concept. Social Innovation Collaboration - SIC is the largest undergraduate group specializing in campus social entrepreneurship. Every autumn, they are hosting the Ignition Innovation Summit, co-founder of Duolingo for the past year. They also hosted a village plan to raise children. Harvard Student Office - HSA is the largest undergraduate management company in the world. They have an organization devoted to learning business and entrepreneurial spirit. One of them is Cronin Enterprise Center, whose name is Michael Cronin, founder of Weston Presidio. HSA also cooperates with CS 50 to provide more resources to students who are interested in developing their own ideas. Click here

The dialectic of Socrates can be dullly described as pursuing wisdom by understanding group dialogue deeply. Sophistication can be explained as a deceptive confusion, but arguments discussing this value theory and virtue. The purpose of the dialectic of Socrates is to establish the truth through discussion and to help people within the group establish authenticity about basic or broader subject matter. Rhetoric and Sophist teaches the purpose of virtue; the way of complex communication tends to discuss and discuss specific topics, which in turn leads to skepticism and the success of the winner. For example, at Plato's Gorgias, a dialectic was held between Sorrath Gorgias and two people, Porus and Carrickle. Since Socrates's ultimate goal is to get real knowledge, he thinks he is willing to change his view to gain the truth. In this case, the basic goal of the dialectic is to establish an exact definition of the subject (in this case a rhetoric) and use arguments and questions to make the subject more accurate. In Gorgiaz, Socrates gains the truth by making a series of questions, and in return returns a short and clear answer. I think that Socrates is innocent. Through their own knowledge, Socrates can show that foolish people are ignorant by asking questions that do not know how to answer. By using the dialectic of Socrates, sophisticated people become irritated and therefore acknowledge that he does not understand the truth and knowledge, Socrates is indeed the wisest man in Athens. Socrates is not afraid to admit that he could not get all the answers. I think that Socrates was accidentally accused and punished. I believe that the jury showed ignorance without allowing him to continue pursuing by choosing to die for Socrates Among all the Sophists, Socrates is my favorite. He was the first Western philosopher who did not write philosophy. His understanding of him comes from his students, Plato and Xenophon. Socrates challenges Sovist doctrine of relativism, moral realism, and may be correct. He also believes that if someone teaches money they can not tell the truth. Socrates completed a philosophical quest called the Socratic method or dialectic. Based on the assumption that the objective of education is not to "fill up empty containers", but to derive the truth from the students, the dialectic of Socrates consists of a series of leading questions that iteratively improve the opinions considered It has been. In Socratic doctrine, the longest order is to "know yourself".

In the field of iPod, SMS, video chat, online video game, e-mail, what do the average teenagers think about morality? Whether this generation's students are receiving the necessary moral support from their parents, school, and community people. Whether these organizations should be involved in helping students develop their ethics. How should morals be defined, and what is "correct"? These are the problems confronted by vocational school counselors (PSC), and we need to ask ourselves regularly. David Purpel explains three general approaches to moral education. Personality education, clarification of value, and cognitive / developmental approach (The Hidden Curriculum and Moral Education, 1983). Sex education is the oldest model by identifying a set of ethical or moral virtues that have been formed through habit formation from childhood. We model the role using modeling and external hardening and assume it is ultimately reliable and predictable. Number of characters! Character education as a general approach has several weaknesses, but there are also weak points specific to that theory and education plan. In order to highlight the problem of this approach, the following discussion will compare character education with studies of Robert Coles on moral life and children's moral wisdom. Let's criticize the number of people! Curriculum Model as a Clear Moral Education in Public Schools Moral education such as character education is as old as society and education. It involves the ethical aspects of individuals and society and explores how to set up correct and false criteria. Therefore, moral education teaches the core moral value of helping to take care of ethically responsible and self-ordered citizens, including integrity and responsibility, and to develop it. Problem solving, decision making, and conflict resolution are also important parts of a good moral character. Excellent role shaping in classrooms and communities is important in ethics education, because role students and students understand how their actions and decisions affect other people in society through role play and discussion. Therefore morality is caught, not lessons learned, life in the classroom is full of moral meaning and shapes the character and moral development of the students. Moral education has various meanings and meanings. There are many ideas about how to teach ethics and values. The result is often suspicion of moral education. First of all, for some educators, this term has a negative meaning, suggesting a hypocritical behavior like a church. In this understanding, morality means freedom, tradition, Puritan Education, and not Drop. Secondly, moral education seems to contradict directly with social moral values ​​and ways of focusing on welfare. Educators may think that they should focus on positive social features and values ​​such as cooperative social coordination and democracy, not moral beliefs. This dangerous view often leads to educators and citizens completely avoiding moral education in a democratic society and therefore leading skepticism about morality.

The American Gerontological Society held the 21st International Conference on Gerontological Medicine and Gerontological Medicine (IAGG) in San Francisco from 23rd to 27th July 2017. In this famous event, top-notch researchers, clinicians, and industry experts gather. They are committed to improving the lives of elderly people This conference attracting over 2,500 organizations from more than 75 countries is a powerful addition to our open dialogue of our community to reflect our progress and further initiatives to promote healthy aging It reminds me that there is no. There are many diverse and energetic speakers that provide detailed insights, executable steps and practical tools to improve innovation, investment, education and outreach in our field. We are pleased to share many PowerPoint presentations from the Bridge blog written by conferences, program summaries, and celebrities in the aging sectors. # To see some moments in IAGG 2017, please see the event Facebook photo album. The final report emphasizes Congress's main content The day of the 22nd Gerontologic and Gerontological Conference (IAGG) World Congress held in Buenos Aires, Argentina, June 20 - 24, 2021. In addition to the AMDA guidelines, ADA, International Gerontological Medicine and International Association of Gerontological Medicine (IAGG) and the European Elderly Diabetes Working Group (EDWPOP) provide selective guidance to the LTC population. The ADA consensus group identified issues in patient care at LTC facilities, including irregular and unpredictable diet intake, inappropriate staffing, and frequent care migration (9). In addition, IAGG and EDWPOP seek to reduce the prevalence and burden of pressure ulcer (13) Diabetes management in nursing care facilities and technical medical facilities: views of the American Diabetes Association At the World Congress of Gerontric Medicine and Gerontological Medicine held in Paris this weekend, a conference on the resolution of biological problems was held at Alzheimer's Disease, Medical Care for Old People, and Osteoporosis Conference. It is organized by Leonard Heyfrik, a professor. Anatomy of the University of California, San Francisco. In the 1960 's, Hayflick found that human cells growing on the plate proliferate a limited number of times - now known as the Hayflick limit. These cells later helped to ignite the cause of cellular senescence, and Hayflick, former chairman of the American Gerontology Association, is known for his skepticism. Gerontological Medicine 2017 welcomes all attendees, hosts and exhibitors from all over the world. The Geriatrics 2017 conference is an elderly physician, an old man doctor, a senior managers, doctors, professors, social workers, palliative care professionals, nurses, old psychologists, health care managers, researchers, students, We will gather to discuss research, achievements and progress in academic field. This conference helps elderly and general public health professionals understand, understand and act quickly to support the elderly in the world. The conference series will be held from 23rd to 24th July 2018 in Lisbon, Portugal, the 8th meeting under the tremendous feedback from participants and supporters of the 7th Gerontological Medicine · Geriatric Palliative Congress. I am pleased to announce the session. International Conference on Geriatric Gerontric Medicine and Palliative Care

During 1900 women can not gain voting rights in the following articles Why in 1914 British ladies have no voting rights in the early 19th century I will discuss with you . You think that women should allow you to vote their arguments why I will tell you and arguments to women get voting rights. Most people dislike the idea that women have the right to vote. They probably can not make wisdom judgment on information on political issues because they have never had the opportunity to see w as women participate in politics, they also say that politics " I believe that I believe it is non-feminine " This is because women of various reasons between 1900 and 1914 could not gain the right to vote for this article between 1900 and 1914 which could not get women's voting rights I will explore. It is seeing feminist, feminist NUWSS which is the main influence of patriarchal society. , Publicity and other influences. By 1900, women have made many advances in education, legal rights and employment opportunities. But they still can not vote in the general election. Many women believe they are always second-class citizens before they gain basic rights to choose their members. Between 1900 and 1914, women found a reason why they could not get the right to vote during the period from 1900 to 1914, and there was a social revolution. In the patriarchal society of the UK, women live together, there is new movement, women seek voting rights. These "new" women face many obstacles, one of which is government skepticism. After November 1911, we began to create our own obstacles by initiating violent protests by WSPU (Women's Social Political Union) who did not have voting rights. During 1900 women can not gain voting rights in the following articles Why in 1914 British ladies have no voting rights in the early 19th century I will discuss with you . You think that women should allow you to vote their arguments why I will tell you and arguments to women get voting rights. Most people dislike the idea that women have the right to vote. They probably can not make wisdom judgment on information on political issues because they have never had the opportunity to see w as women participate in politics, they also say that politics " I believe that I believe it is non-feminine "

Stacy * and I met at her office on Friday morning in February. She has a quaint little flower shop in town, about a hour's west south of Houston. Her shop was in her family for about 100 years, but it was not open that day. When Stacey was ready for our interview, I occupied myself by praising the thick mountains of paper on her desk. She has full invoice, email, check check, and letter of thanks. In various places from the printer to the floor, half of the sky cup cups were arranged neatly around the room, I found even a place 6 feet tall above the dark wooden cabinet. Last week, Stacy Blackman Consulting CEO, Stacy Blackman (monthly mother of November MBA) was announced. In the first part of her special report, Stacy tells us about her beautiful family and provides advice to the woman thinking about her career. In Part 2, Stacy remains the truth - considering the MBA, her time management skills, childcare settings, ideas for the MBA Mama community, and women, while sharing the greatest mistakes women commit in the admission process, We will provide expert advice especially to the mother. One of the most sensational criminal stories in recent years is the disappearance of 23 year old Stacy Peterson. In 2007, Stacey lived in her police officer, Drew Peterson, Pauli Brook in Illinois. He was 30 years old and was the fourth marriage. On 28th October, Stacey disappeared due to troubles with Drew 's marriage at the time, and the suspicion was immediately directed to him. Three years ago, Drew's third wife, Kathleen Savio, was found dead in a bathtub, initially thought to be a coincidence drowning. Drew attracted many life insurance policies, but Stacy's disappearance led to another investigation on Catherine's death. In 2009, Drew was condemned as having killed the former wife and was eventually sentenced to 38 years in prison. He is still the main suspect of Stacy's disappearance, but her body has never been found. Stacey greeted her new sister Ashley with gentle skepticism and light embarrassment; Stacy wondered if she brought up the baby to a certain extent when she was dead in her sleep at the age of several months It was. Death ("Since she thought that she wanted Ashley to leave, she died?") "Can you catch a small island in developing countries while sleeping?" Until Stacey carefully asked , Other affectionate parents did not understand the confusion of their daughters subject to their own mourning. Death, the whole family began to recover from sorrow. It is said that parents' feelings are low and they are retreating, but the old one somewhat simplifies the anticipated confusion and painful feeling after death, but Stacy himself does not show a clear behavior change Hmm. Parent's answer to Stacy's horrible question - an acronym for SIDS before returning to the center of the problem - is not realistic. EB

The scientific revolution discusses different beliefs and attitudes of Cervantes, Banyan, Milton, Spinoza and Pascal. Discuss their skepticism / doctrinal beliefs, the reasons behind them, and your opinion. The scientific revolution brought about a sudden explosion of revolutionary inventions, thoughts and literature. Many people believe that Cervantes Saavedra, Spanish writer Miguel, is one of Spain's best writers. Spain is a Catholic country, and many of its documents reflect this value. Similarities between scientific revolution and enlightenment thought In this article we will explore the similarities between scientific revolutionary thought and enlightenment thought. The scientific revolution represents the era when the universe was drawn in ways observed through the advancement of science in the 16th and 17th centuries. Enlightenment refers to a kind of campaign born of a revolutionary new scientific thinking that occurred in the latter half of the 17th century. What is the Science Revolution? And why is it important for Europe? When is scientific revolution useful for development? These are some of the questions many people raised when asked to define the scientific revolution and enlightenment of the 17th and 18th centuries. The terms "scientific revolution" and "enlightenment" are used to describe two important stages Europe encountered in the 16th and 19th centuries. The scientific revolution of the 17th century had a major impact on Europe Let's see. The scientific revolution is the name we use to explain the important scientific breakthrough that happened in the 16th and 17th centuries. The scientific revolution is closely related to enlightenment, which is an intellectual movement from the end of the 17th century to the 19th century. Nicholas Copernicus became the early leader of the scientific revolution based on modern (or solar-centered) cosmology. Galileo Galilei is another important person. He pioneered the development of the telescope and was condemned as a heathen who supported the heart of Copernicus. During the scientific revolution, many scientists made a significant contribution to the field of astronomy. These scientists include Galileo Galilei, Nicholas Copernicus, and Marie Winkelmann. Copernicus was admired by believing in the heart center where the sun is the center of the universe. It is the most important contribution of the scientific revolution. It raises the hearts of other scientists and casts doubts on the beginning of how the church draws the universe. Galileo further refined the telescope and observed it. He proved that the universe is not composed of substances resembling the Earth. With the idea of ​​Copernicus and Galileo, people began to ignore the beliefs of the Earth 's beliefs. Since the church doubted the overall interpretation of the universe church, he began to attack the ideas of Copernicus and Galileo. Another excellent astronomer is Mary Winkelmann.

Republic's justice payment depicts a very important theme in the introduction of the Plato Republic. It is a debate as to whether a person is good for guiding good and just existence. The three men, Thrasymachus, Glaucon, and Adeimantus, asserted that justice would not pay for this extreme debate. I believe that expressing corruption more favorably by letting all three people join together. Firstly, we must explore the basis of the Republic's moral skepticism given by Trashimachus. Republic (1) -> Justice is only a strong advantage. Thrasymachus argues that this is his definition, but that is not the true definition of justice, but the legalization of justice. He said that this is not fair. It is only for people who act fairly, but for others it is good for action. Here Trasimachus assumes that justice is our unnatural constraint on the natural desire to have more things. Justice is the practice imposed on us and arguing it is not good for us. A reasonable approach is to completely ignore justice In the fourth part of Plato's "Republic", Socrates defines individual justice as well as state justice. I explained the definition of Socrates' s personal justice, then Socrates shows that he can not prove the correct definition of justice and raises further questions about justice. I assert that if we act according to this justice definition, we do not know when to take action. - In this article I will look into the Socratic argument of the Phaedo and Plato in the Republic of Plato in detail. First, I will first analyze the debate of human morality between the Republic, Socrates and the Glaucon. Discussion first defines a good community ethics and continues to apply this definition to humans. Then I will analyze Socrates' assertions about the immortality of the soul, the faedo. In Plato's "Republic", we, the reader are presented with two personality who do not agree with simple but elusive questions. What is justice? In this article, I will explain the definition of justice of Trashimachus and the differences of opinion and opinion of Socrates. In addition, I will comment on various discussions raised by Socrates and Trashimakos and provide critical comments and examples to explain the consent of my particular opponent's particular discussion or disagreement. - The Socrates 'description through "Book of Socrates' Death and Death" has produced considerable controversial features in Western history. In many ways, Socrates changed the notion of common philosophy of ancient Greece; he changed the philosophical view from a way to study things to a consideration. Specifically, he analyzed the virtue and health of the human soul.

Soloman, the premise of game theory, thinks that as game theory becomes more complicated, we tend to ignore the problem rather than solving the problem. He thinks that the problem is not New Hobbes (or Rawls) but how to think about business and yourself like Aristotle, and I think the game theory model is just a preset. Soloman discusses seven presets in the first part of his book, Moral and Excellence. They are: reason and attention, motivation and self-interest, money and measurement, anomaly of altruism, good and goal, open field, and role of rule. Under the premise of philosophy, the fundamental difference in the theory of natural law is rooted in the essence of law, the essence of man, and the philosophical premise of the meaning of "nature". The meaning of natural law theory of Roman Catholicism, Protestantism, and secular humanism will be constrained by these philosophical assumptions from the beginning. Indeed, many theological differences have found the ultimate source of division among philosophical assumptions. For those who tend to think that metaphysical knowledge is not as admirable as professional logic science, nature, people, laws, and intelligence of God are increasingly skeptical. All these obstacles of deep philosophical significance, even if the existence of the law of nature is the closest, it is difficult to accept it. Philosophy Skepticism comes from knowledge theory, and one area of ​​philosophy is called "epistemology". Epistemology studies the foundation of our belief and the source of our concept. It reveals a default preset that may prove often wrong, and this is what we really know. Start with Hawking and let Einstein speak the truth. It is easy to get the authority to accept concepts that are proved useful when ordering things, as we forget their secular origins as unchangeable gifts. Therefore, they are classified as "essentials of thinking", "transcendental gifts", and so on. The path of scientific progress has often been impossible for such a mistake for a long time. Therefore, it is not an idle game if you analyze long-term general concepts, indicate the circumstances in which their reasons and usefulness depends, how they grow from just the number of experiences.

As part of my second semester research and its impact, I seek several structured case studies to illustrate my knowledge of selected research, including skepticism, effectiveness, and ethics doing. One case study I studied was Goldacre (2009). Research is frequently distorted, presents erroneous information leading to contradiction, and changes the meaning of the research being done. Therefore, "Sharp, Peters and Howard (2002) is trying to improve knowledge system by improving knowledge system through systematic process, discovering nontrivial facts and insights" (Sharp, Peters and Howard, 2002). This is part of my learning travel series, I have continued to participate in various world themes and began to learn to improve my sentences. Despite being the last published article (the final version), this is actually the second topic I went through after visualizing the data. The concept of basic income, also known as basic income security, citizen income, unconditional basic income, universal primary income (UBI) or general demographics, is strange until I return to the documentary on weekends. "Free Lunch Association" is displayed as part of the 2017 festival design I have quiet for a while since I began learning about data science and its basics, and I am still learning how to improve myself everyday. This is a wonderful journey. Data science and artificial intelligence are a new "industrial revolution" which has drastically increased the demand of skilled experts who draw knowledge from data. Therefore, for those who want to enter the worksite, learn with the desire to become experts in data, increase their employment opportunities, or want to learn to experience new things or to stay new It is actually the best. It's time. In this article, we are carefully choosing the best resources to start learning data science, simply to improve and refine data science. Statistics and machine learning skills In a future article, I will discuss some of the obstacles I encountered while studying and how I skipped them. Also, I will explain obstacles that are known soon. Finally, we record how we learned a specific concept. I hope that it will help my future self remember the basics and help other new programmers start their journey.

"In your philosophy, heaven and earth are more than dreams" (Shakespeare, 211). The quotation from William Shakespeare's "The tragedy of Prince Denmark Hamlet" presents a very good idea. It shows that in our modern philosophy, we are not even pulling out factors leading to the nature of things around us. Our philosophy focuses on the concept of causality. Regardless of whether people are aware of this, every point they claim is based on one reason and / or its influence. This is not necessarily important, but most people are too late to analyze the true relationship between the cause and its impact. David Hume did a wonderful job. David Hume was born in Edinburgh, Scotland. He first studied law at the University of Edinburgh. Hume served as secretary, librarian and embassy staff. David Hume went to France twice. He met Jean Jacques Rousseau, Diderot, d'Hollbach, Turgot, d'Alembert. When Rousseau came to England to find a job. Hume helped Rousseau find a job, and Rousseau could not stick to it for his prosecution. In addition, Hume does not allow us to apply the concept of "knowledge" to natural science. Hume distinguishes between what we call now analytical knowledge and the concept of de facto problems we currently call synthetic knowledge. Analysis, or prior knowledge and integration, posterior knowledge has the truth of two different standards David Hume Hume, David, 1711-76, Scottish philosopher, and historian. Hume brings empiricalism of John Rock and George Berkeley to the logical extremes of fundamental skepticism. He denied the possibility of certain kinds of knowledge and found a series of emotions in his mind and believed that the causal relationship in nature was entirely from B's introduction. The answer to the theme is drawn by the time committee named as illusion by David Hume, and the time committee named human by himself. In the era of modern philosophy, when the influence of Descartes was still important, David Hume brought the argument of killing the Descartes I created and skipping it like a ghost in human perception. You can see not only the theme but also the contrast between Hume and Descartes.

The global financial crisis has caused widespread changes in global consumption expenditure behavior and consumption patterns, which have influenced people's consumption and purchasing power. In the study of consumer spending behavior in 2008 by Booz and Company, first of all, the sharp rise in crude oil prices, the sharp deterioration in housing prices, and the integration of the unprecedented credit crisis affected the entire economy and consumed Bringing a big change in behavior of people. In the global financial crisis, a new paper on journalism research focused on mainstream newspapers in the United States, the UK and Australia during the 2008 global financial crisis. According to the newspaper, the mainstream financial media "generally do not issue warnings, lack sufficient skepticism when reporting finance and economic trends, journalists are closer to sources of information used to obtain information Too much. " Poverty, a study by Media & Jornalismo published at the Media and Journalism Research Center at Coimbra University in Portugal, reports that Western news media frequently reports poverty performance such as famine, overcrowding and natural disasters, but "poverty is" emergency The problem, "the reporter says, Economic and financial crisis 2 World financial crisis Article on global financial crisis What is the reliable predictor of economic and financial crisis? Economists often can not predict the economic or financial crisis. Regardless of whether the economy is slow or fast, you can predict how the economy will evolve. Economists use key economic indicators that do not always accurately predict changes in the economy. There are three economic headline groups that allow investors to point out the economic direction. In order for economic indicators to have some value, we need to keep the information up-to-date in order to predict what will happen. The global financial market experienced a global economic crisis that began in the United States in 2008. Real economic production of the world is decreasing. The global financial system has undergone reform and the possibility of falling into crisis is low. Please describe the outcome and unresolved issues in the global crisis. The economy

Moral egoist thinks it is morally right to act strictly according to his own interests. Naturally, this belief poses a threat to social cooperation and therefore obviously brings about a great political problem. I think the best example of moral egoism is reflected in the first volume of the Republic of Plato. In this book, Plato introduces the concept of moral self-interest, explains the political problems it constitutes, and solves the problem through the words of Socrates. I will use this paper to clarify the discussion to support and oppose the concept of moral egoism and to pay attention to the political problems it brings and the correct way to solve it. Moral egoism can be broadly divided into three categories: individual, individual, and universal. A personal moral egoist will think that everyone should benefit from "my" (personal) self-interest; a personal moral egoist will act for his or her own interests I do not think it should be done to anyone else. The universal moral egoist should do everything to make a request; everyone will argue that they should act in a way that fits their own interests. Philosopher Henry Sidgwick introduced a moral egoism to the book "The Moral Method" written in 1874. Sidgwick compares the philosophy of egoism and utilitarianism and wrote that utilitarianism is trying to maximize overall enjoyment. And selfishness only focuses on maximizing personal joy. In Plato 's Republic and Rachel' s egoism and moral skepticism, both authors tackle two important aspects of human morality: objectivity of epistemology. Moral egoism is a normative argument that states that moral beings should do what is in their best interests. On the other hand, psychological egoism is a descriptive assertion that all moral creatures can only act for their own benefit, even if they act for the benefit of others. The difference between the two claims is that one is a normative claim and the other is a descriptive claim. Normological assertions include determining what people should do and creating ethical standards. Therefore, descriptive claims basically explain behaviors of moral beings and create ethical standards based on their behavior. Because of the relevance of these two arguments, I must first clearly distinguish the main features of each discussion. In "Challenge of Cloncon", Plato has established a long dialogue between Socrates and Plato's Brothers Grocone Plato and the Republic of Poland in 360 BC were translated into Benjamin J. Wit by Plato Republic in 360 BC. INTRODUCTION In addition to the law, the Republic of Plato is the longest piece of his work and is certainly the greatest work. - Plato in education as a summary of rational development: Socrates' s great educational innovation is attributing moral value to introspective activities targeting life. His concept of eudaimonia is completely different from the concept of ordinary people, so speaking about it sometimes creates a contradictory atmosphere like an apology 30 b 3

Hume uses three speakers to introduce various ways of reasoning. Cleanthes, Philo, Demea are three speakers of Hume's dialogue on natural religion and they are available to readers as a unique and contrasting method of reasoning and knowledge. Some Cleanthes contrasted his "detailed philosophical approach" and "causal skepticism of Philo" and "strict orthodoxy of Demea". Demea first explained his personal approach to knowledge through his example of how to train and educate his child. For a variety of reasons, this approach is questionable, which explains why scientific philosophers tend to remove the term "causality" from the discussion of determinism. Generally, as John America (1986) ridiculed, this method is "ambiguous conceptual determinism, trying to explain true causal relationship". In particular, "More specifically, neither philosophers nor laymen have the concept of events.The same can be said about the correlation cause in modern physics theory and the concept of adequate cause.In Bertrand Russell in 1912 By opposing the notion of reasoning in these ways (and other aspects), the situation has not changed. By trying to define causality decisions based on a series of earlier adequate conditions, we inevitably Fall into the confusion of the open negative condition list necessary to achieve the desired satisfaction. Well I will let you answer Rebecca's first objection; there is no reason (deterministic obvious obedience reason) that our actions are meaningless. It is necessary to distinguish between appropriate and inappropriate conditions. A good condition is that the reason is forcing people to act in a specific way - that can not be different. There are reasons for inadequate conditions, but they are not overwhelming - people can choose different ways. According to William Hasker's words, "If you think you are willing to sell my old car to me, I will accept it. Your offer is the condition that I accept it The perfect reason is that because it does not require my consent, this behavior still makes sense as we choose to develop it based on the facts provided.

Election of the new Conservative party leader has two stages. First of all, a conservative MP that wishes to stand up presents their name. From this list (May 5, 2001), conservative members voted to decide who they would like to be, until the top two candidates were found. Thereafter, another vote was held, in which all Conservative parties voted to decide that they would like to become the remaining two leaders. This is a brand new election leader system. Therefore, the election of Conservative new leaders may see a new struggle between modernism and traditionalism. - How to be integrated into a political project Firstly, I will appeal to Conservative parties and members and general citizens of 2020. Regardless of whether the UK chooses to stay in the EU or choose to leave, an important division in leader elections may be among the skeptics of Europe. The European realist supporters who continue to join the EU (compared with the past decades, it is not supposed to be real Europhile like Ken Clarke or Michael Heseltine). Candidates will decide based on their position in the referendum and their depth of engagement in skepticism in Europe I am conservative in my life. Powerful supporters of the free market principle and freedom. A person who truly believes in career. Over the past decade I have worked with conservative candidates, elected leaders, and party activists. I resolved enough with a bad attack in Dallas last night. I will no longer read or care for bipartisan news entities or conservative echo chambers. I barely slept last night. I am a new father and I'm more and more interested in the world where my little girl grows. After becoming parents, these horrible events such as events in Dallas, or the shootings in Minneapolis and Baton Rouge truly made people think. I recall long ago, tragic events once combined us as a country. Now, as the left and right echo chambers become stronger and more extreme, these events pull us apart.

There are many discussions about the accuracy of eyewitness testimony in the criminal justice system all over the world. In particular, the discussion included false beliefs caused by false eyewitness testimonies (Areh, 2011; Howitt, 2012; Nelson, Laney, Bowman-Fowler, Knowles, Davis & Loftus, 2011). The purpose of this paper is to consider psychological studies on the accuracy of eyewitness testimony and its position in the criminal justice system. First of all, this article will explain how witnesses and their testimonies are used in the criminal justice system, and discussions on their use today. Witnesses and testimony play a major role in today's criminal justice system, but skepticism of witnesses is rising. Forensic evidence is used to compromise the credibility of witness testimony and the main cause of false beliefs in the United States is witness mistakes. The role of eyewitness testimonies when generating false confessions and factors that reduced the reliability of these witnesses' testimonies have been sent There are many discussions about the accuracy of eyewitness testimony in the criminal justice system all over the world. In particular, the discussion included false beliefs caused by false eyewitness testimonies (Areh, 2011; Howitt, 2012; Nelson, Laney, Bowman-Fowler, Knowles, Davis & Loftus, 2011). The purpose of this paper is to consider psychological studies on the accuracy of eyewitness testimony and its position in the criminal justice system. - In physics textbooks, heat is defined as energy transfer between the system and the environment. Heat is divided into three types of latent heat, specific heat, sensible heat. These three different types of thermal energy can be transmitted in various ways, such as conduction, convection, radiation. The transfer of heat is important as it ensures proper distribution

From the perspective of communication, Disney is the most vulnerable. In terms of communication, Disney is the most vulnerable to public and government relations. Eisner presented the land of a new theme near the capital; however, the ideal property is the history and important wealth of the Virginia Federation. The idea of ​​destroying history in order to gain a potential benefit does not claim citizenship and land influence. In case study, CEO Eisner learned about American Historical Theme Park in the battle area of ​​Prince William County, Virginia. It is the cover story of a new issue of Barron's Weekly that makes people think. The theme is Netflix. This is a view on Barron's extreme skepticism. The title says, "Disney avoids, Amazon appears and Facebook turns into a video, Netflix's cash writing is susceptible." The stock price may drop by 50%. Numbers were tested by forensic examination and reached a conclusion. Author Jack Hoff points out that Netflix's cash consumption this year will be between $ 2 billion and $ 2.5 billion, which is devoted to expenditure on "lean debt." The stock price is very high, although the stock price is 171 USD per share, but its profit is slight. This year it cost a lot of money (about 6 billion dollars) to acquire content and create content. (In contrast, HBO will spend about 2 billion dollars on content this year.) Since Iger bought, Disney made several important acquisitions. The three greatest possibilities are the three most important transactions that any company has done in this area so far. In 2006, Disney acquired Pixar for $ 7.4 billion. In 2009, Disney acquired Marvel for $ 4.3 billion. In 2012, Disney acquired Lucasfilm for $ 4 billion. Everyone knows that Disney 's first Star Wars "force awakening" will be released this December. It is still unknown how box office income is being done. The last Star Wars movie "Revenge of Sith" was released 10 years ago, earning $ 380 million in the country. It is bigger than the phantom threat of 1999 but less than 50 million dollars

It is confined in a small, dark, window-free room and sounds like a scene in a horror movie for several hours. But Isabel Loeffler is doing this everyday, and the place she thinks to be the safest, that is, her school. Robert Tomsho's article "When discipline begins to fight" is a story about Isabel Loeffler's real life. Isabel is an 8 year old girl with autism and several other obstacles. Isabel was placed in an ordinary classroom but received little assistance, but later the judge ruled that the act violated federal law. This research will discuss the critical analysis of the two articles used in my research proposal. Both articles require two different qualitative and quantitative research fields; articles must represent two paradigm hypotheses; the selected articles belong to both quantitative and post quantitative Positivism, qualitative and constructivistic methods and paradigms, each article is analyzed to examine the methodology of critical analysis; use of research questions; theory or other framework; definition, limits and meanings; method And procedures; quality and strict position This paper uses network data to study the current state and situation of skepticism in climate science and climate conflict. This research begins with a scientific econometric analysis that analyzes the distribution of disciplines and shared publishing places. Scientometric data show that skepticists of climate change are part of climate science, share the field distribution, and share the mainstream of the famous scientific community. In addition to becoming "mainstream", skeptics have their own unique channels and fields.

The rise in the cost of class dispute universities is becoming increasingly expensive, and the students are working hard to make a living. Brigit M. just graduated from a public university in southern New Jersey and won the GPA. She is a full time student and works as a waitress outside the school and works as a leader in economics and writing on campus 8 to 12 hours a week. Brigit received a scholarship but did not pay other fees such as books, transportation expenses, medical expenses. She has an employer who works according to school schedule, but she is having difficulty going home from work at 11 pm. Students and parents often find myself lamenting the university's university price tag and the university tuition fee is steadily rising. According to the National Education Statistics Center, the annual average cost of the university in 1981 was $ 3,101 if the tuition fee of the university was adjusted according to inflation. However, in 2011, this figure was $ 18,497. Although the rise in the cost of the university is complicated, the rise in the cost of the university may have a particularly serious blow to economically difficult students. According to the report by the American Institute in 2012, taxpayer subsidies for public universities in 2010 have been lower than in the previous year. Budget cuts have given a particularly serious blow to public agencies, and schools often have to raise their tuition fees to pay them. Even in private schools, if you reduce the education budget, access to subsidies and similar subsidies will be restricted so you may lose money. These budget cuts to promote tuition fees may also lead to students and their families faced with their budget cuts. The rise in the cost of class dispute universities is becoming increasingly expensive, and the students are working hard to make a living. Brigit M. completed a public university in southern New Jersey with 4.0 GPA. She is a full time student and works as a waitress outside the school and works as a leader in economics and writing on campus 8 to 12 hours a week. Brigit received a scholarship but did not pay other fees such as books, transportation expenses, medical expenses. - University is not easy, in fact, it is terrible. It is a little hard work and work can be overwhelming. We all go to university for various reasons. The main reason why I went to university was to receive higher education. Our students have got used to promoting to higher education such as university, but after all it really is worthwhile. Everyone has heard stories of parents' voices, students full of seemingly unbearable loan debt, and politicians suffering from the American middle class. This is the most common question posed by commentators on my article on GOP's skepticism in higher education. This is a problem. The higher the cost of the university, the more difficult it is for higher education. The more student loans there is, there is the possibility of delaying "growth" of "buying a house" or "making a family." There are many other reasons that we want to solve this problem as a society - at first glance seems to be a substantial problem - but in all articles, columns, television groups, political discussions you are satisfied Some explanation, why the cost of the university will rise at such unsustainable rate?

"The pleasant, witty and annoying history of Wolf's modern architecture is a high-level comedy, such as treating a lot of money, manners, popular preferences." - Publishers Weekly "No wonder, this book is the most popular topic in the Manhattan building salon." - New York Times book review "Tom Wolf squeezed an interesting story with glass and stones ... very funny." - Wall Street Journal Tom Wolf (1930 - 2018) is one of the founders of the news movement and is the author of contemporary classical writers such as Electric Cool Aid Test, Light Staff, Radical Thick, Maumaushing Flake Catcher. As a novel "Vagrant bonfire", "filled with people", "I am Charlotte Simmons". As a journalist he wrote an article in a magazine named "Washington Post", "New York Herald Tribune", "Mr. Fashion", "New York" and called it "The Me Decade". Among his many honors, Tom received the National Book Award, the John Dos Passo Award, the Washington Irvine Literary Excellence Award, the National Humanities Award, and the National Contribution Fund Award. He is from Richmond, Virginia and has a bachelor 's degree. He graduated from Washington and Lee University and got a doctorate. In American studies at Yale University. He lives in New York. Skepticism about modernism is not limited to the UK. In the United States, Tom Wolf wrote from Bauhaus to our house, from Bauhaus directly to the United States to explain the Prince of European silver, he wrote that he built houses that look like worker's house and pesticide factory. Reliable point He suggested that any attempt to actually sit on the Le Corbusier's reclining chair would adopt karate behind his neck. "In modernism attacks on inhumane behavior, and in the extreme case anything that can be filled with contemporary nicknames has concluded that modernism can not find beauty and that it is not worth it. I thought, "Wilk said. The mind still believes in the early moral mission of modernists. Therefore, the crime of a concrete tower where Le Corbusier's design is inadequate and construction is inadequate has little to do with his work. The wolf suddenly came to our house from Bauhaus and finished his question. But the answer is in its early stages, Wolff explained the first principle that Gropius and his colleagues built Bauhaus. They were so excited by the new industrial era and they named themselves as Prince. I think there are many designers close to many things today, but that is more than just the possibilities of new materials and manufacturing processes. Design enthusiasm, such as behavioral interventions, nudging in the "correct" direction of people, most people meaning "right" or supporting loyalty, is one example of the same impulses leading to machines is. To survive This is synonymous with a hero designer, bring new knowledge to customers, educate customers, and improve customer hobbies. Walter Gropius and other Bauhaus teachers and graduates play Moses' role and can acquire knowledge that has not been washed from the mountain even if it is not washed. I passed the director of the Yale museum. Designers have problems as a convincing taste maker. Mr. Wolf said how modernist luxury clients feel dissatisfied with the design of architects and how people working in modernist architecture impose restrictions on their "living machines" I often speak about what. For Gropius and Mies, Philip Johnson and others, if the customer is not satisfied, it is because they are caught by their bourgeois view, not because the building is bad.

Modernism and postmodernism Modernism understands science as a process of learning, and in order to become truth and reality it is necessary to test and measure everything. Modernists believe that knowledge and expertise ultimately solve problems and pursue progress. The value and sequence of the educators in the classroom and their goal is to measure the test input and output by completing a standardized test. They want to analyze and make learners who can think critically. CC: Your criticism against Benjamin and Adorno points out the difference between the understanding of modernity after the Renaissance and the understanding of modernity since 1848. The arts since 1848 are about daily disillusionment, secularization and sanctity, but fundamentally different from the romantic era from the Renaissance art to the Hegel era. On the other hand, this difference depends on the difference between Kant and Hegel, on the other hand it relies on Marx and should not be understood as a difference in thinking. On the contrary, it is a true historical difference between 1848 and the world after 1848, which requires a completely different attitude towards enlightenment, disillusionment, destruction and recurrence. In this article, we explain the direct relationship between modernism and postmodern in various temporal and spatial contexts, and the similarities between postmodern and modern world. However, the complexity of postmodern world is not over yet. For me, that is just the beginning. Looking forward to finding some relationship, I will release them as soon as possible! thank you for reading Postmodern is a very difficult concept to define. A French philosopher defined Postmodernism as "a suspect of all metanarathies", but this basically means skepticism about all claims of absolute truth. The elements and techniques used by postmodern authors raise doubts about their reading experiences and motivate readers to examine their own understanding of life and social value. - Hundred Years of Solitude - Magical Realism Centuries-old lonely magical realism is a literary form of strange, grotesque and dreamlike stories related, as the events are common. Magical realism is the opposite of the "one at a time" story style, and the writer emphasizes the wonderful quality of imaginary events. In a world of magical realism, the narrator talks about surrealism, so that of course it will be a reality As I said, the story of postmodernism is the response to modernism and contemporary art. There is no fixed definition of postmodern philosophy, but they have some features. The story of postmodern is not limited to one type. They combine several types into what are called closely fitting ones. KTVI provides popular Tamil movie type templates by combining comedy, mystery, tragedy, romance, war, satire, drama. It destroys the genre and structure, making the movies ridiculous. The second feature of postmodern is metafiction or a self-mentioned story. Modernism emphasizes the unique viewpoint of filmmakers, postmoderns attract attention of audiences, but the movie itself is just a movie, through the understanding of the fictional personality of the character, visual effects, or ... . Overall idea Destroying the narrator behind this, or in this case, the Director Parthipen keeps reminding us that this is just a movie

What constitutes knowledge The function of the mind has always been the focus of the origin of philosophers from humanity. One of the main focus of what many thinkers have thought is to constitute knowledge. At first glance the problem seems to be cut off and dry, but the problem has become more complicated. This can be witnessed by many different epistemological theories advocated by various times. This can be seen by observing the four different views on classical knowledge, Plato, Epicurus, Stoic, skepticism. Knowledge theory (epistemology) is a philosophical study on the nature, scope and limitations of knowledge composition, acquisition and analysis. The fundamental problem that is not solved by epistemology is the definition of knowledge. There are differences among philosophers in this problem, some people analyze it as a reasonable true belief, others are different, and rational true beliefs do not constitute knowledge . The purpose of this paper is to compare Plato and Aristotle's knowledge theory. Empiricism and rationalism answer the source of knowledge, the problem of nature, but do not properly solve the problem of composition of knowledge. One theory that attempts to answer this question is a tripartite theory that states that knowledge has three main factors: belief, reason, and truth, or knowledge is a reasonable true belief. According to this theory, if you believe in something with a good reason, this constitutes knowledge. (Holt, 2006). Faith is the first condition as long as people do not believe it can be known even if it is true. You must believe that it can be knowledge. Therefore, knowledge requires faith. Of course, not all beliefs constitute knowledge. Faith is necessary, but it is not enough to gain knowledge. We sometimes make us mistake what we believe; in other words, some of our beliefs are true, but the other beliefs are wrong. When we are going to acquire knowledge, we strive to increase our stock of true beliefs (while minimizing our false beliefs). We can say that the most typical purpose of faith is to explain or capture the actual existence of things; that is, when a person forms a belief, a person can think between human ideas and the world We are seeking a match of. (Of course, they may form beliefs for other reasons, making positive attitudes, deceiving yourself, etc). But when asking for knowledge, we are trying to do things right. Match; some of our beliefs do not explain the actual existence of things

In this article, I will answer the following questions. In participatory culture, consumers and producers no longer play separate roles but may think that we interact with new rules that we do not fully understand. Participants. "Jenkins, Henry, Fusion Culture (London: New York University Press, 2006) identifies a text or series of texts that challenge the previously established rules of communication between consumers and producers. I will outline how text or text challenges the established rules and how the participating culture shows the collapse of the space between consumers and producers. "Convergent culture: a place where old and new media conflict" - Jenkins (2006: 2) explained the fusion culture using three different concepts "media integration, participation in culture, collective intelligence" It is. It is a flow of information that spans countless media industries, and the collaboration between these media and media consumers seeks the "nomadic" behavior of the type of entertainment they desire and it defines the terms of fusion culture To do. The authors suggest that integration is not just a technical concept of integrating various media into one device, but rather cultural and social integration and encourages consumers to behave as communities, not individuals . As early as 2006, Henry Jenkins explains the mechanism of integration in his work "The Convergent Culture: The Place where the New and Old Media Collide" that opened the eyes which is the factor of our postmodern media culture Did. However, Jenkins quickly revealed skepticism about how contemporary technology fight this convergent mechanism of this mysterious prophecy. Old-style media content that has met consumer demand for many years has been digitally compressed to fit the new costumes. Clearly, in the opinion of Jenkins, it is not necessarily attractive: I think this is a good representative of modern fusion culture. Fusion culture of Henry Jenkins, fusion culture is "intersection of old and new media, intersection of grassroots and enterprise media, interaction of media producer power and media consumer power in an unpredictable way". He compared the character of Sesame Street with Osama bin Laden, a terrorist in the Middle East, and outlined the story of a teenage boys who received amazing media coverage and lost control.

They are composed of meteors, not smog, they leave cosmic dust, that is why they are so beautiful. We can dance the bird's flapping wing melody, we will hear many different sounds and colors They want to work with us, all our roots can be worn like a bracelet, we can be very happy You can see the sky light up them only when you hear the fireworks So, what you said about Andy, or "gold" was born in the novel (Hello, poetry!), Led a series of questions about love. Sarah Kay often talks about writing poetry as a question making process - doing something on the page, or finding answers or more questions within the process. When you ask David Orr of poetry critic, he may tell you that poetry and music are two different art forms. His response to the Bob Dylan Nobel Prize for Literature almost summarized his skepticism about the blurring of music and poetry boundaries. Literature and composition Langston Hughes and Bob Dylan Langston Hughes and Bob Dylan are two contemporary American poet poets from different eras. Bob Dylan is like a composer, but I consider most of his work as poetry. In this article I will explain the Hughes poem "Harlem" and Dylan's "A-Changin era" as a cultural explanation, but the background is different. Both poets use social protest actions to express their views. - The poems of Langston Hughes 's "I, Too" and Karen' s "Event" use different forms of visual images, tones, exaggerations, symbols and prophecies to explain the commonalities between the two different races ing. The interaction of life can not fight their prejudice like the private life of African-American civil war. Poetry was always my treatment. For the women who are nervous, nervous and worried, my only expression is poetry as a result of sneaky bastards that freeze in the middle of discussion. I grew up as the youngest of two brothers and sisters, and my voice drowned in the authority of the people who seemed to know better. But personally the situation is different. In my bedroom's privacy, I am a teacher, a speaker, a powerful poet. I pretend to be an audience, perform my poems, dramatic pauses, and emphasized phrases. I have not talked to anyone over the years, I think that it is strange and strange that it has no one else. After all, I wrote something personal. You can not make a stage together with personal things.

Strength strength is "quality or characteristic that brings strength, strength, vitality, or sustainability" (Millard 126). In a nutshell, the advantage is that I am good at it. I often want to know what my strengths are. Paul who wrote a letter to Timothy said, "The Lord is on my side, my message was completely declared and all the Gentiles gave me the power to hear it." It was. Chapter 17) My strengths can be used to commemorate Alpha and Omega, no matter how strange or useless. A few days ago I began to consider my next career step, reducing my values, strengths, motivation and other complex aspects. I began to focus on the idea of ​​how to combine my technical and research capabilities with creativity and communication skills. I started with brainstorming, fantasy, and new possibilities. That's all. Ancient skepticism ("Hello, doubt!") I think that it feels like heavy feeling, cold water, darkness. Hundreds of uncontrollable ideas. "Your thoughts are ridiculous, do you really think that such professionals exist? Why do you get it? Anyway, what do you think? How do you solve your visa status Do you? Blalabla. "Back to bed My friend responded to me for my strength. For example, in anticipation, it is a creative, perfectionist, supporter, a good manager, an avid observer. There are several advantages in my mind, but I have not thought of such a reaction. The most shocking thing is that I am an excellent administrator, I have not considered this direction. I envied the majority of my HBS classmates when I told myself that they found their sweet spot. Whatever my passion, it becomes my strength, whatever my strength is, it will be my passion. These are overlapping and growing circles, and they are growing bigger and bigger. And extrinsic motives have little impact on my choice. (I can find everything in the internal motivation list below, but beyond the list of external motives, except that there is the possibility of limiting my ability to pursue internal motives There is nothing, so money is a negative and external constraint, not a positive extrinsic motive, because I have to find some way to keep myself.

In this paper, we consider the position of fundamentalism and consistency and believe that a form of weak fundamentalism is one of the most satisfying choices for avoiding the most malicious thing as an effective theory of knowledge controversy . A viable way to return to a problem Skepticism fundamentalism solves the problem of infinite regression as follows. If someone O is proved to have a belief X, then X must be proved by another belief Y. Fundamentalism says that the structure of knowledge and reason is like a building consisting of a superstructure built on the foundation. According to consistency, this metaphor is wrong. The structure of knowledge and reason is similar to the network, where the strength of any given region depends on the strength of the surrounding region. Therefore, coherent denies any basic belief. As we saw in the previous section, there are two different basic ideas. Therefore, there are two corresponding ways to build coherence. It is refusing the basicity of stupidity or denying the basis of recognition. We consider the first coherence as a denial of the basicity of doxastic. (Iii) occurs from (i), and (iv) from (ii). An uncompromising foundation refuses to rely on consistency. This fundamental belief that the basic belief p is a belief not dependent on any other reason to believe other propositions q. This fundamentalism can be called independent fundamentalism because it claims that the rationale of the fundamental belief is completely independent of the defense of any other beliefs. The logic of conflict between fundamentalism and consistency seems to indicate that the conflict between the two views ultimately leads to a conflict between dependenceism and independence fundamentalism. Experience basement is supported by case studies such as Blue Hat. It seems reasonable to think that such an example is based on perceived experience. However, they do not mediate between consistency and independence fundamentalism, because none of these ideas tends to perceive experiences to explain why perceptual beliefs are reasonable . Finally, fundamentalism can be supported by proposing opposition to consistency. A notable objection is that consistency does not guarantee that a reasonable belief system is in contact with the reality. This objection arises from the fact that the novel is entirely coherent. So why do you think the consistency of the belief system is the reason to believe that the belief in the system tends to be true?

Reliability of witness's testimony Part 1 - How reliable is the witness's testimony? Reconstructive nature of memory - the reconstructed nature of schema memory and stereotype memory is related to schema theory. The pattern is a memory package that is organized and developed in our life. Patterns are stored in long-term memory. Most people have similar patterns. It was approved by Bower, Black, and Turner (1979). Please remember the most important things they did when they went to the restaurant. Witnesses and testimony play a major role in today's criminal justice system, but skepticism of witnesses is rising. Legal evidence is used to impair the credibility of witness testimony The main reason for false beliefs in the United States is the witness's misunderstanding. Eyewitness testimony as a source of reliable evidence Witness testimonies are reliable in today's judicial system in cognitive psychology? Word Count: 3944 Summary Is the eyewitness testimony a reliable source of evidence in today's justice system? Many juries tend to pay close attention to the witness's testimony. They ignore psychology behind recalling events. Our brain is a complicated structure that is hard to absorb ... Although the evidence of witnesses is very important in solving crime, more and more cases are now being confirmed by DNA evidence. How confident is confidence based only on the evidence of the witness? A variety of factors are related to the accuracy and consistency of the evidence of the eyewitness testimony, such as the content of queuing, the instruction of queuing, the skill of the interviewer's question, especially the sex and age of the witness. Since the beginning of the 20th century, psychologists have been searching for the credibility of the witness's testimony. One of the famous pioneers proved that the controversial book "Witness Booth" (1908) was a witness to the witnesses, but in particular the law was criticized violently. Boundaries But his idea is actually welcomed by the masses. Decades later, DNA testing will eliminate individuals convicted based on erroneous eyewitness testimony. According to Scheck, Neufel, and Dwyer's work, many DNA-based exemptions contain evidence of evidence.

Due to the collapse of 2008, international trade and foreign direct investment sharply declined. In order to successfully negotiate the uncertain road facing many companies, administrators must change strategic approaches in various ways. It may be necessary to shift strategies to emphasize adapting to the local situation from the integration of each country. According to a recent survey of HBR readers, prior to the crisis, 88% of managers thought that a global strategy is indispensable, not a series of choices that need to be carefully evaluated. The financial crisis in 2008 revealed that there is a big gap in economists' understanding of financial intermediation. Mainstream economists have a very simple and stylized bank model that ignores the enormous number of financial products and strategies that have evolved over the past 50 years. They argue that they can answer questions about financial regulation, such as how to set bank capital requirements without clearly understanding how financial intermediaries create value. In the global financial crisis, a new paper on journalism research focused on mainstream newspapers in the United States, the UK and Australia during the 2008 global financial crisis. According to the newspaper, the mainstream financial media "generally do not issue warnings, lack sufficient skepticism when reporting finance and economic trends, journalists are closer to sources of information used to obtain information Too much. " Poverty, a study by Media & Jornalismo published at the Media and Journalism Research Center at Coimbra University in Portugal, reports that Western news media frequently reports poverty performance such as famine, overcrowding and natural disasters, but "poverty is" emergency The problem, "the reporter says, Charles Ferguson's 2008 Internal Working Documentary and exposure on the details of the financial crisis has nothing to do with the global climate crisis, but its impact on corruption, greed, and power is discussed in David Wallace's paper It resonates strongly with some of the themes. . It is a suspicious businessman of water, Naomi Oresquez and Eric Conway. At the same time, "This is water" is related to the reason why people can not motivate by the sympathy of the people around us and the health of the environment in our daily life. For example, Mr. Foster detailed the idea that university degrees can not prepare for the reality of life, and that the argument has not been discussed even though the "adult" American lifestyle is ubiquitous (3).

Over the years, European society has relied on religion to answer most of their questions. But the age of enlightenment was when the Europeans opened the light and made everyone think in a new way. Age of Enlightenment is an era when philosophers promote logic and reason and answer questions to society. These thinkers do not mind about the afterlife, only care about secular views. In addition, philosophy is very important in enlightenment, the most influential philosophers are Montesquieu, Voltaire and Rousseau. Age of Enlightenment is an age of scientific awakening, and Age of Enlightenment is mainly developed in France. The starting point of enlightenment is John Rock's book on human understanding. Enlightenment attacked the leaders of the church and focused on the problems that had been avoided in the past. Trying to challenge the church takes courage. As the Church said, enlightenment questioned people such as "Earth is the center of the universe". There are four major areas of transformation: religion, intellectuals, economics, and politics. From the Middle Ages to Enlightenment and the 19th century, along with enlightenment and the 19th century, the evolution of knowledge has changed drastically. From the 17th century to the 18th and 19th centuries, the age of enlightenment was thought to be a cultural movement of intellectuals. It also began spreading to American colonies on continental Europe. This is by purpose https://www.studymode.com/subjects/which-labels-for-the-middle-ages-best-describe-the-era-between-500-and-1400-in-europe-the-dark-ages- Europe's most faithful, or oldest feudal age of the golden era - page 1. Html "The labels of the Middle Ages best describe the European Dark Ages from 500 to 1400, or the feudalism era of the European Golden Age," theses and research papers Okay, men and girls, ready to enlightenment In this lesson I will introduce enlightenment. what is that? Enlightenment, sometimes called the era of enlightenment, was an intellectual movement from the late 17th century to the early 18th century, emphasizing reasons, individualism, and skepticism. Enlightenment challenged the traditional religious view. Because that was such a wide movement, enlightenment did not have an accurate start date. It did not pop up, but it gradually developed. Most historians came to the beginning of enlightenment from the mid 17th century to the beginning of the 18th century. The work of intellectuals like Rene Descartes, Barus Spinoza, Isaac Newton is particularly important for the creation of enlightenment. Jean-Baptiste Poquelin Moliere wrote Tartuffe at the beginning of Age of Enlightenment. A big feature of Age of Enlightenment was promotion of rationality, not emotion to make a decision. The enlightenment leaders truly believe that if people do this, the world will be better. In Tartuf, when a character makes a decision using his emotions, they feel that they are in a bad state. And those who make them rule over their emotions

James Harold considers the current global economic crisis from his historical point of view in his book "Value of Creation and Destruction: Globalization Cycle". Harold led a comparison of the Great Depression with the current situation and what series of events happened and what happened. His view suggests that globalization and value are carried out in successive cycles where they are built and then decomposed in an iterative order. Harold did a good job to build his own confidence and clearly portrayed his view. Harold James: Value Creation and Destruction: Globalization Cycle (2009, published by Harvard University Press): One argument here is that as globalization was under the Great Depression, the dominance of globalization is at the expense of the economic depression It may be. It will weaken in the same way. Written before: the end of globalization: The lesson of the Great Depression. Rawn James Jr: Double V: How war, protests and Harry Truman abolished the US military (Bloomsbury Press, 2013): One of the first major breakthroughs in civil rights after World War II. Furthermore, I do not doubt that it will be a nightmare because there is not much progress in trying to keep guns and maintain isolation in modern armies, as the US wants "cold" and cooler wars I will. In fact, as far as feudalism exists, we can claim that separation can only survive in the south. James, Harold, creation and destruction of value, globalization cycle, Harvard University Press, scheduled for release in September 2009. Professor of UK history international affairs at Princeton University launched the current discussion on non - globalization with historical background on the current crisis. Korten, David, New Economic Agenda: Miraculous Wealth to Real Fortune, 2009 Berrett-Koehler. The intellectuals who oppose what he calls "corporate globalization" show a totally different view on economic prosperity with respect to the quality of life rather than the interests of companies. James's theory - his future book "Reflecting on creation and destruction of value: the cycle of globalization" - has skepticism. "If you think that globalization is primarily a matter of trade flow, it slowed down," Moisés Naím, a foreign policy magazine editor, said. "But it is certainly a network of interactions between institutions and individuals in various fields and I think this is mainly an irreversible political and technical revolution." Globalization is undoubtedly a It represents a big change. Since World War II, world trade has steadily grown driven by the Western political agreement to promote trade for peace and prosperity. Over the past two decades, this process has accelerated dramatically and China, India and other emerging countries have become active in global markets.

Why are people of this era, 1600 - 1770 called the era of enlightenment? In this age of enlightenment, humans in the ear think that they are "enlightened" groups. I believe that they are solving human problems. They believe that it is close to other times to understand how the universe and people work, and how to live a better life and live a better life. Why is it sometimes called the era of reason? Between 1600 and 1700, the era of reason is the name of this era. Great thinkers of the time and people who received education think that the universe and the world are logical, rational and reasonable. The age of enlightenment was an age of scientific awakening; the era of enlightenment mainly developed in France. The starting point for Enlightenment is John Locke's book on human understanding. Enlightenment attacked church leaders and focused on problems that were avoided in the past. Trying to challenge the church requires courage. Illuminati asked people "Earth is the center of the universe." There are four major areas of change, religion, intellectuals, economics, politics. From the Middle Ages to the Enlightenment and the Enlightenment of the 19th century and the 19th century, the evolution of knowledge has changed dramatically. From the 17th century to the 18th century to the 19th century, the era of enlightenment was regarded as a cultural movement of intellectuals. It is said that it began to spread to American colonies of Continental Europe. This is by purpose https://www.studymode.com/subjects/which-labels-for-the-middle-ages-best-describe-the-era-between-500-and-1400-in-europe-the-dark-ages- Feudal age of Europe's most faithful, or most golden age ages - page 1. Html Labels and research papers label "What is the best medieval beliefs describing the era of the feudalism of the golden era of the European 500 to 1400 or the European dark era era" Well, men and women, preparation for enlightenment. In this lesson we will introduce Enlightenment. what is that? Enlightenment is sometimes called "era of enlightenment", emphasizing rationality, individualism and skepticism, the 17th century intellectual movement and the late 18th century. Enlightenment challenged the traditional religious view. The Enlightenment was such a broad movement, so there was no exact start date. I did not pop up, but it gradually developed. Most historians set the beginning of the Enlightenment from the middle of the 17th century to the beginning of the 18th century. The work of intellectuals such as Rene Descartes, Barus Spinoza, Isaac Newton is particularly important for the creation of the Enlightenment. Jean-Baptiste Poquelin Moliere wrote Tartuffe at the beginning of Enlightenment's era. A major characteristic of the awareness era was promotion of rationality over emotions for decision making. The Enlightenment leaders truly believe that the world will be better if people do this. In Tartov, when a character makes decisions using his emotions, they feel that they are in a bad state. And those feelings dominate them

David Hume raised doubts about the world's knowledge with the option of "skeptical about the behavior of understanding." This problem is related to induction problems. David Hume was one of the first people to decide to analyze this problem. He begins to choose by providing a form to split human knowledge and then discusses its dependence on reasoning and experience. According to Mr. Hume, people believe that the future will be similar to the past, but there is no evidence to support this belief. In this article we will clarify the form of knowledge and reasoning and consider Hume 's induction which is a difficult problem for justified explanation of truthful beliefs. This division is also called "break fork". The relationship of thinking is deductive, "intuitive or performance decision" and can be found only by simple thinking maneuver "(Hume, 1748, p. 422). This group can include mathematical ideas and mathematical proofs. For example, 2 plus 2 is 4 statements. Therefore, it is unthinkable to negate these sentences, and it is logically impossible. For example, we can think of a triangle, and we all know that it has three sides. Later, since the rectangle becomes a rectangle, you can imagine a rectangular triangle and immediately face conflicts. This is a priori as it is irrelevant to the outside world and does not give us any information about the world at all. The second is the "de facto problem" after. "Facts" are words for us to understand the world and the sources of knowledge of these words are "the present evidence of our senses" and "our memory record" (Hume, 1748, p. 423). The statement of this group and the denial of these statements are not self-contradictory and can not be imagined. For example, we can say that the next house is yellow, this statement can be thought of as correct, but at the same time can be treated as false and imagine that their house is blue 2018 8/6 Philosophy / logic - inductive my thesis on recursive length questions Inductive thesis: 1208 words (35 double space pages) Evaluation: carefully selected papers open the choice of document preview 'skepticism Target. All of this can be explained by the concept of natural contradiction, proposed as a solution to the problem of recurrence in the philosophy of science. The concept is just a philosophical treatment. Philosophy (Greek, philosophy, literally from love for wisdom) is a regressive argument about the situation of general and fundamental research doubting the requirements of knowledge. The induction problem is basically a problem of what we can learn from experience, understanding induction problems is the main reason to understand Hume's philosophy, and the problem is how people explain It is related to what to do. Why are philosophers interested in computational complexity? Scott aaronson abstract Since philosophy has changed linguistics into abstract propositions, if we learn that something can be computed, we can assume that the philosopher of today The problem faces David Hume. The problem is a bit different, and it has become an epistemological question justifying the true belief about the proposition.

This sentence is synonymous with Macbeth. This is also one of the most important themes of this tragedy, the introduction of appearance and reality. Shakespeare uses various roles and situations to emphasize reality and surreal, reality and falsehood, and disruption of behavior and integrity. To discuss this topic, there are various roles of the wizard in the first paragraph, Duncan in the second paragraph, and Mrs. Macbeth in the third paragraph. Macbeth 's appearance and reality, Mrs Macbeth Macbeth is one of Shakespeare's most mysterious plays, humanity research. In Macbeth, the theme of appearance and reality is clear. It is full of countless, famous and important scenes, including when King Duncan visited Macbeth 's house, Lady Macbeth' s sleepwalking scene, Macbeth 's dagger monologue. They provided their own psychological insight about the character of Lady Macbeth and Lady Macbeth and showed different and very unique movies with many different themes. The protagonists of the movie, Leicester (Kevin Paisley) and Carolyn Burnham (Annette Benin) have proved that there is a big difference between appearance and reality. With the help of the colonel Frank Fitts (Wes Bentley), we learned that people can judge not only their appearance but also the inner one. People do not necessarily look like them. Lester Burnham as a movie talker In real life, we should not judge based only on our own appearance. There are many people who seem to be reliable, but they are not. Appearance and reality are important themes of William Shakespeare's Macbeth. The subject focuses on the tragic result of such mistakes in personality and judgment fooled by seemingly authentic people. In these roles, the appearance and reality of Duncan, who excurses Macbeth, the witch and her own tricks Mrs. Macbeth, Macbeth of Hamlet Hamlet, are composed mainly of various competing forces. One of these forces is the difference between appearance and reality, in other words the difference between appearance and reality. What is it, just how does it look like? I can see that Hamlet has made two main perspectives on this issue. First of all, there is a big difference between inner emotions and external emotions, and between them. In other words, The appearance of "Hamlet" is one of the central themes of Shakespeare's "Hamlet". The role of role in the play is the role of the hidden character - in fact the murderer and looter Claudius plays a role of sad brother and legitimate king, in her son's view Gertrude's Adultery plays a role she is the "most harmful woman" who plays the role of "the most beautiful queen". Even Hamlet himself played a crazy role in his attempt. Philosophical problems in Bertrand Russell's "appearance and reality" The approach to his subject in Bertrand Russell's "philosophical problems" involves Descartes' fundamental skepticism, in which the author cancels all previous assumptions It was. Certain reality and existence. In the first chapter, Russell 's quest for reality in reality compared to reality starts with observation of his surroundings. For example, I checked the form and he confirmed it

David Hume is an insightful philosopher and thinker and has shown us the problems we are constraining and what we are making the human nature a reality. Specifically, Hume is trying to persuade us to understand the facts. In this fact, we are based on life, form the custom on certain matters, and we are surrounding How do you adapt to the other things? After all, we do not know how things develop We can only assume past experiences, things will be customized and become customary through causality and casual language. David Hume Hume, David, 1711-76, Scottish philosopher, and historian. Hume brings empiricalism of John Rock and George Berkeley to the logical extremes of fundamental skepticism. He denied the possibility of certain kinds of knowledge and found a series of emotions in his mind and believed that the causal relationship in nature was entirely from B's introduction. The answer to the theme is drawn by the time committee named as illusion by David Hume, and the time committee named human by himself. In the era of modern philosophy, when the influence of Descartes was still important, David Hume brought the argument of killing the Descartes I created and skipping it like a ghost in human perception. You can see not only the theme but also the contrast between Hume and Descartes. Our recognition and memory The famous philosophers David Hume and Rene Descartes are those who are looking for answers and definitions of individual identity. Both of them considered their ideas and issued two different conclusions. Some people think that individual identity can not be understood, but others confirm that their certainty is their thinking and perception. David Hume begins discussing personal identity by denying this David Hume is studying physical and mental problems. Hume also investigated the person's character, the relationship between humans and animals, and the nature of the agent. Hume pointed out that we tend to think we are the same person five years ago. We have changed in various ways, but the same person appears there. You can start thinking about which functions can be changed without changing the fundamental self. However, Hume denies that there are differences between the various features of people and the magical self that is said to have these characteristics. "In addition to specific awareness, we will never pay close attention to anything - human beings are turning at incredible speed, a bunch or collection of different cognitions in constant flow and movement "

This is a gathering of former Socrates' wonderful authoritative philosophical thought. As only a few fragments and witnesses will survive it is still difficult to understand even in highly structured and clearly described versions. Many explanations are ambiguous and contradictory, fragments are ambiguous and difficult to decipher in many cases. Despite the difficulties of all sentences, it is absolutely necessary for all students of philosophy and the history of science. If the Sophist is merely hiring a teacher, nothing is wonderful. However, in reality, most of their teachings are controversial and include important philosophical themes. First, like other theological philosophers, they claim a naturalistic worldview to replace the traditional and old mythical worldview. This helps to compromise the traditional moral and religious values ​​of the children they teach. Secondly, many Sofist teach controversial techniques called anti-logic to their students. For example, a book called Twofold Arguments written by an anonymous boss summarizes the pros and cons of ethical issues such as the ability to teach moral goodness, honor, justice, and virtue. As a result of this teaching, the boss is accused of destroying the concept of truth by showing weaker debates more strongly. Elea's Parmenides is a Greek theologian philosopher. As the first philosopher who explored the existence itself, he is undoubtedly called the "father of metaphysics". As the first reason to use deductive and transcendental debate to prove his argument, his title to compete with Aristotle is "image of his father". Logic "He is often considered a founder of" elementary school "- a philosophical label due to Presocratics, who is believed to believe in a sense that it is a unified, unchanging single existence in a sense. Given this suspicious interpretation, Parmenides has traditionally been seen as an important figure in the history of philosophy: a metaphysical standard that must challenge the predecessor's physical system and its successors. character The last group of theocracy philosophers was the boss who is a group of freelance teachers ("Greek" wise men) "known for their skepticism. They travel in the Greek region, but sometimes as a political representative of their hometown, they travel in Greece's greatest city, Athens. At the time, they were filled with important educational functions. In the absence of public schools, the choice of parents is limited to educating children. The two general options are to find a nearby businessman whose father is going to raise his son in family business or treat his son as an apprentice. Sobist provides a third option that is especially attractive for wealthy families. Sophist argues that anything can be taught, they charge for their service. They are particularly good at rhetoric and politics, attracting parents who want to make their sons the leaders of citizens.

Somerset · Morm Somerset · Morm was born in Paris on January 25, 1874. His father is a lawyer at the British Embassy. However, he became an orphan at the age of ten and lived in his uncle, a priest in Whitstable and in the UK. Maugham received education in the UK and is studying literature and philosophy at the University of Heidelberg. In 1897, he was qualified as a surgeon at St. Thomas Medical School and spent a one - year internship in London slums. However, he gave up drugs after the success of the first two novels. W Somerset Maugham was born at the British Embassy in Paris on 25th January 1874, known as W. Somerset Maugham William Somerset Maugham CH is a British playwright, novelist, short story writer. TheQuoteDiary.com was one of the most popular writers at the time and was said to be the most highly-skilled writer in the 1930s. We are looking for the most popular writers and their famous quotes. TheQuoteDiary has more than 400 famous writers and their quotes. You can find quotes from your favorite authors here. W Somerset Maugham Quotes 47 I W. SOMERSET MAUGHAM W. Somerset Magham (). British novelist, short story writer, playwright. Morgam was trained by a doctor at St. Thomas Hospital in London (John Keats received training 75 years ago). Based on the life of Paul Gauguin, he writes over 60 books including autobiographical novel "Human Shackles" (1915), Moon and Six Pence (1919), overview (1938), and author's note (1949) writing. Year), a series of personal memories reflecting his skepticism and the philosophy of his life. From the summary, I have not known a way to better train writers, not medical professionals for many years. I think that you can learn much about human nature at law firms; but in general, you must fully manage your transactions with men. Furthermore, the advantages he deals with are usually very important. He is looking at humanity from a professional point of view. The doctor is very cautious It is new. Fixed and extended the story of the third edition. Poetry ESSA Y S by RICHARD REYNOLDS, M. D. and Johnstone, M. D. Edit

Hobbes, Rock, Rousseau, Machiavelli From the 13th to the 18th century, the political realm of Western civilization changed dramatically. From the beginning of the scientific revolution, only during the Renaissance progress, secularization, and skepticism led not only to the intellectual life of the Western people but also to their political change. At the forefront of political discussion, there are Male Fluent Machiavelli, Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau. The influence of these people is often criticized, but it can be clearly seen for centuries and decades after their famous works. In this article, I will briefly introduce the social contract theory by Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau. I will explain what social contract theory is and why. Then according to Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau's paper pointed out the state of nature. It also proposed differences in opinion among these natural state law scholars on social contracts and finally suggested a critical understanding of social contract theory given by Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau. Key words: world literature language, education, law theory, comparative linguistics, political philosophy, law, political law, cultural research, political theory, contact between religion, theology, contact between civilizations, conflict, Islam, philosophy, history, criticism , Renaissance Imagination of social contract by Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau. Social contract theory is one of the oldest philosophical theories about the origin of the country. The first inspiration of this concept is said to originate from a biblical deal between God and Abraham, and later Greek Socrates, which was written mainly by Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau It is a work. . Social contracts are ethical and / or political obligations that rely on the formation of social contracts or consensus among people. The social contract theory has three main stages of development, namely the natural state, contract or contract, and civil society. These three stages provide a fundamental difference between Thomas Hobbes, John Rock, Jean-Jacques Rousseau's theory. Hobbies, rock and Rousseau. The contractual conditions assumed by these theories are not identical, they arise from the details of the original position assumed by a particular social contractor theorist. T. HoBBEs, LEVIATHAN, J. LOCKE, Civil Administration, J. See RoUSSEAu, Social Contract. Instead, make sure everyone is equal - a truly fair arrangement. 49 This equality does not exist in reality. This is because actual social contracts are concluded by parties who are most concerned about nurturing their own interests. Strong people can influence others and be able to secure contracts. We can not fairly and unfairly endorse the interests of the strong and sacrifice the weak. Therefore, thought experiments are necessary, Rawis is applied to all future arrangements, imagine situations where we must agree to the norm of justice rather than explain our specific interests I ask.

Explanation: Classical quarterly magazine is known for publishing top quality classical scholarship for almost 100 years. It publishes research papers and short notes in the areas of language, literature, history and philosophy. There are two major problems every May and December (about 300 pages each). Given the quality and depth of articles posted in the Classical Quarterly, copying on that shelf is necessary for full-fledged classical libraries. "Mobile Wall" represents the period between the latest issue available in JSTOR and the latest journal. The moving wall is usually expressed in terms of age. In rare cases, since the issuer selected the "zero" mobile wall, the current problem will be made public on JSTOR as soon as it is issued. For example, if the current year is 2008 and the journal has a 5 year moving frame, you can get the 2002 article. Pythagoras School: Pythagoras of Samos Island (575-500 BC). Pythagoras schools pay less attention to substances than formalities and relationships of things. Numbers are the principles of things - digital mysticism. There are two origins of astronomy. It is a systematic star system and chaotic dynamic world of the earth. Morality is also rooted in quantitative mysticism. Eleatic Sc ​​hool: Xenophanes (570 - 480 BC) Colophon, the predecessor, the first basis of skepticism in Greek thought, the founder of Parmenides - permanent - change philosophy is relative: combination and separation There is a contradiction between existence and nonexistence, Zeno (paradox) (490-430 BC) and Samos' Melisus are defenders of doctrine Pythagoras and their followers have a mystical and metaphysical belief system of Pythagoreanism. Pythagoras' idea is mainly a deep inexplicable view of the world. Pythagoras's Code further restricts his members from eating meat, fish, beans, and they are inspired by religious, moral and forbidden reasons, especially the idea of ​​reincarnation - the soul is in other animals It is transferred to the body of. "Pythagoras himself has established a small community important for learning, vegetarianism, sexual restraint or abstinence, a later philosopher believes that singleism will help philosophers seek for the required separation Balance " Early modern European mysticism was highly dependent on the teachings of Pythagoras. German humanist Johannes Roy Hillin (1455-1522) claims that Pythagoranism is synthesized with Christian theology and the Jewish Cabala, and that Kabbalah and Pythagoranism are subjects of the mosaic tradition . I am inspired, so Pythagoras is a coverage. According to the mystical teachings of Pythagoras, four of the four points, Roy Hallin compared the quarter of Pythagoras with the unexplained sacred name YHWH in his dialogue De Verbo mirifico (1494) . Each letter is classified as a symbolic meaning

Summary of Ardisteles' Reform of Pediaia: Ancient Greek education features dialectical educational movements, among which one student defended the lecturer's strict question. Aristophanes' cloud, like Plato and Aristotle, criticized the practice of promoting ideological skepticism, moral sinism, and biblical spirit - winning argument rather than asking for the truth. We propose Aristotle's logic to reform the practice of dialectic law. In the first part of the article, I defended the argument that Aristotle's syllabicism is an art of substantive reasoning against contemporary ideas, which is the science of abstract theory. Paideia Institute held the 3rd High School Essay Competition. I will present an award-winning paper at In Medias Res. The winners will receive a full scholarship from Paideia College's Latin High School Life Latin Course or Paideia Greek High School program. The paper expires March 1, 2018, it should be between 500 and 1000 words. Please send all the papers in .pdf format to inmediasres@paideia-institute.org. The submission must include student name, high school name, grade, Latin or Greek teacher's name. In order to receive a scholarship, students must meet the prerequisites of the anticipated plan. Please check the prerequisites here and here. Students asking CPS Montessori, Piedia and STEM elementary school (or student's parents) would like to enroll in a high school that continues Montessori, Piedia, or STEM courses. If so, these high school options will be offered. If high school is not selected, parent / student will continue to participate in the prize process and select high school. Brothers and sisters' preferences apply only to high school students prefer. This means that brothers and sisters go on to higher school rather than other students. Brothers and sisters now need to enroll at the high school the students desire in 7, 8, 9, 10 or 11 graders and live in the same address. At the age of 12, Nawroz prospered at Decatur. She soon learned English and recently he is a direct student who entered the famous Independent School Pydia School of Druid Hill. She wants to be a doctor. Her father, Taha, is seeking help after his posttraumatic stress disorder, after seeing atrocities in his hometown. And her brother is receiving physical therapy. It is a kind of help he could not get during the war. It is impossible to accomplish this as part of its travel prohibition which is necessary to ensure national security if the family wishes to resettle in the United States under the restrictions imposed by the trump regime . Nawroz and her family arrived in Georgia two years ago and does not have an "intimate family relationship"

John Locke, Berkeley, Hume are both experienced philosophers. They all have different opinions, but I agree with three things; the only source of real knowledge is unreliable inappropriate knowledge paths unless it is based on a solid foundation of sensory experience A certain sensory experience Evidence indicates that natural thinking in the mind is learned from experience. Each of these philosophers formed some of the most fascinating concepts of our relationship with the surrounding world. Empiricism, a belief in the realization of knowledge through sensation, is the universal belief of several great contemporary philosophers. Perhaps the most famous empiricists are John Locke, George Berkeley and David Hume who are considered to be one of the most influential philosophers in the past 500 years. Due to the importance of experience in philosophical principles, each philosopher can be regarded as an experientist. More specifically, the empirical perspective of rock can be seen from his view on the primary and secondary nature of objects. David Hume Hume, David, 1711-76, Scottish philosopher, and historian. Hume brings empiricalism of John Rock and George Berkeley to the logical extremes of fundamental skepticism. He denied the possibility of certain kinds of knowledge and found a series of emotions in his mind and believed that the causal relationship in nature was entirely from B's introduction. The answer to the theme is drawn by the time committee named as illusion by David Hume, and the time committee named human by himself. In the era of modern philosophy, when the influence of Descartes was still important, David Hume brought the argument of killing the Descartes I created and skipping it like a ghost in human perception. You can see not only the theme but also the contrast between Hume and Descartes. Among the important philosophers related to empiricism are Aristotle, Thomas Aquinas, Francis Bacon, Thomas Hobbes, John Rock, George Berkeley, David Hume, and John Stuart Mill. Recently, positivists such as Mach, Vienna Circle, logical positivists, and most followers of analysis philosophy are empiricists. The central concept of scientific and scientific methods is that all evidence must be based on observable evidence by sensory or sensory extension empirically or empirically. It is distinguished from philosophical usage of empirical philosophy by using adjective "experience" or adverb "experience". Experience refers to the use of working assumptions used in combination with natural science and social science and can be tested or experimentally tested. In this sense, the scientific statement is the subject of our experience and observation and is derived from them.

There is also a classified facility inspector who is a group of people supervising various industrial facilities and agricultural facilities. The inspector confirms that the facility meets environmental requirements. They are responsible for inspecting and monitoring facilities and informing the public about environmental risks and dangers. Different levels of licenses are issued to the facility based on the relative risk level and inspectors can issue management measures based on nonconformity. French environmental journalist Denis Delbecq is a French climate debate expert and a famous actor and was widely known as the "archive" of French environmental magazine TerraEco in 2010 in 2010. For comparative case studies presented in this paper, Delbecq provides a short list of French famous skeptics and other scientists and scientific organizations. Since there is no such list (except for a long list of more than 400 scientists who oppose the skepticism of climate change proposed by Allegre and Courtoe) we do not triangulate existing lists, I use a house list. Skeptics are Claude Alegre, Vincent Courreau, Luc Ferry, Serge Garam, Dominique Rukotto, Marcel Le Roux, Jean Martin, Benoit Litt, Laurent Cabrör, Charles Mueller, Jean-Michelle Beuve , Vincent · Benal In October 2015, a draft on TTIP sustainability leaked to Guardian. When French environmental lawyers were asked for comments on this document, they explained that the proposed environmental protection measures are "compared to investor protection" and "almost no existence". In accordance with bilateral trade agreements over the past 10 years, 60% of the 127 ISDS cases were brought against the EU countries. According to Joseph E. Stiglitz, TTIP has the effect of "chilling" on the regulation, thereby "weakening the urgently necessary climate behavior required by the Paris Agreement". He said that industries that do not pay pollution 'social costs actually receive implicit subsidies and TTIP said they would increase opportunities for companies to appeal the government for environmental protection mechanisms. A new process announced in March was developed at the Department of Energy's Idaho National Center for Engineering Environment. Researchers Bob Fox and Dan Ginosar discovered that using French frying oil can produce higher grade fuels while converting to faster and cheaper and more environmentally friendly diesel oil than existing processes . Fox and Ginosar achieve this by using a catalyst development system fixed in solution. The solvent is continuously circulated in the treatment solution to leave the finished product. As a result, the separation of biodiesel and glycerin is improved, both substances are cleaner and higher grade.

The causal relationship between Hume and causality is a tool used to combine events and create some kind of explanation. Hume lists "Three Principles of Connections between Ideas" to indicate different ways in which ideas can be tied together (14). These principles are similar, adjacent, there is a causal relationship. The focus of investigation on human understanding lies in the principle listed third. In the first part, Hume emphasizes the need to reveal the truth about human thought, even if that process may be difficult and exhausting. When discussing the interpretation of the causal relationship of Hume, its effect is explained in this relation. Hume explains the causal relationship in causality such as thinking, necessity, skepticism and so on. These three points explain the peak of Hume's causal theory. When discussing ideas, we must consider the fact that ideas range from the challenge of death to inspiration. For example, when Hume discussed ideology, he referred to the golden mountain. "When we think of golden mountains, we will combine only two unanimous ideas, gold and mountain, all of our thoughts or weak ideas are our impressions or a more vivid impression." (Hume 212) As long as there is an idea, there is a complex thought process reflecting whether the idea is beneficial or insignificant. What are these ideas yet "What if?" Usually comes from the causal relationship of specific ideas. What if he was arrested? The causal relationship between Hume and causality is a tool used to combine events and create some kind of explanation. Hume lists "Three Principles of Connections between Ideas" to indicate different ways in which ideas can be tied together (14). These principles are similar, adjacent, there is a causal relationship. The focus of investigation on human understanding lies in the principle listed third. In the first part, Hume 's sturdy Navy also. This tension of the competition that led to war was another reason for the First World War. Imperialism is another reason for the First World War. As defined in Dictionary.com, imperialism is "policies and nations that will expand and control the empire's rule and authority, and acquire and control colonies and dependents." The rapid development of the German economy is threatened

"The latter is less meaningful and more powerful in monopoly," Adorno thinks. The media blends the format of high and low culture, blurring the boundary between them. The cultural industry regards "masses" as the subject of passive influence calculation. Consumers believe that the media has adapted to their needs; in fact, the cultural industry has created this feeling to enhance its influence. The cultural industry as a term was built by school Marxist Theodore Adorno and Max Horkheimer of Frankfurt. The original work was "Culture industry: enlightenment as a large-scale fraud", "dialectic dialectic" (1944), suggesting the creation and reproduction of all forms of popular culture including radio, television, and a part of movies. Standardized cultural products like other finished products from the factory, the sole purpose is philosophy and compromise, not capital production. An article by Max Horkheimer and Theodor Adorno entitled Maxter's Dialectics (1947) is entitled "Juliet, or Enlightenment and Morality" and interprets Juliet 's ruthless and computational behavior as an explicit indication of Enlightenment philosophy. Likewise, psychoanalyst Jacques Lacan proposed in 1966 's article on "Kant Avic Saad" Saad' s ethics complemented by the absolute order first proposed by Emanuel Kant. But at least one philosopher refused Adorno and Hawk Heimer's claim that the moral skepticism of Sadr is actually consistent in nature, or that it reflects the Enlightenment Foucault actually took up some of his views from the work of Froedo-Marxist by Frankfurt School of Marx · Jorgehemer and Theodore Adorno. Deep criticism of contradiction: Enlightenment is full of understanding. Moreover, through rule of tool rationality, it tends to be totalitarian like fascism in the 20th century. (It is surprising that this book does not have knowledge about Communism, for many liberal critics of the Enlightenment like Berlin it comes directly from the rationalism of philosophers.)

Epicurean and his nearest companion have a wide range of literary works, and at least 42 different Epicurean works are widely distributed (including 37 extensive nature, some of which survived) And 12 Metrodolls and four books. Polyanus' book. It is said that the original epicurus is filled with 300 volumes that do not match any other ancient philosopher. Epicuras died in 270 BC. Painful urinary tract obstruction and accompanying dysentery infection. In the last few hours of his life, he wrote an emotional letter to Idomeneus, where he evaluated the pleasure of remembering his friendship with him before his painful suffering . When he entered a warm bronze bath and asked for wine, he encountered his ending, swallowed a drink, then urged believers to remember their doctrine with the last breath. My friend, the truth that I teach will be acquired soon. " Epicuras set up epicureanism. Epicurus is based on his philosophy of hedonism - the only benefit in life is happiness. However, Epicuras teaches that not all fun is good. Extreme happiness can lead to pain, so the only benefit is peace and calm happiness. Epicuras said that the highest pleasure is two freedom from physical health and peace of mind, pain. Skepticism is a school of philosophy founded by Pils of Ellis, as well as the prosperity of Stow's philosophy and epicureanism. Pyrrho taught us not to know anything. He said that our senses deceive us do not have the exact way to understand things. Therefore, all requirements on knowledge are wrong. We do not know anything, so in this viewpoint we should be indifferent to everything and should not make any judgment.

"The reform movement in the United States is trying to expand the ideals of democracy.For example, to evaluate the validity of this statement, please refer to 1825-1850.The reform movement in the United States from 1825 to 1850 These democratic principles include voting for all people over the age of 18 (except minors, women, madmen, criminals), freedom of speech, news, Includes speech, religion, public election, property rights, freedom and general voting.Education, multiple parties, right of equality, equality before law, proper procedure, separation c What is the effect of the second big awakening? The second awakening was very important as it unreasonably addressed and led to the establishment of a reform movement to alleviate suffering. For example, he insisted on liberation movement, women's suffrage movement, abolition movement, and liberation based on religious grounds. An article on the second awakening outlines one of the important events of his president. In the next video we will tell you about other important facts, history, and dates of the political affairs experienced by the President of the United States from March 4, 1797 to March 4, 1801. Like many other reform campaigns during this period anti - slavery was awakened a second time and was influenced by the time of religious resurrection in the new state. Thus, although the spirit of reform at this time was expressed by various exercises, often with conflicting political goals, most reform campaigns are based on the principle of making the person awaken greatly through discipline, order, and detention I emphasize. The power to reform the American society created by the second awakening will give women new opportunities. Many people are joining the reform team sponsored by their church. Women played a leading role in all major reform movement of the day. Catherine Beecher, Emma Willard, Elizabeth Blackwell and Unpreston provide higher education during public school sports. In most cases, Dorothea Dix has carried out reforms to treat prisoners and people with mental illness. Most of the community leaders of the drinking movement are female; after all, they and their children are the main victims of alcohol abuse by husbands and fathers. The second awakening brought about a social reform period before the war and emphasized the relief of the system. The second awakening was the resurrection movement of the Protestant in the early 19th century. The campaign started around 1790 and gained momentum before 1800 years; since 1820 the number of members between the Baptist church and the Methodist church increased rapidly and their missionaries led the movement. The second awakening began to decline in 1870. It recruited millions of new members and brought the formation of a new denomination. It is said to be opposed to skepticism, deity, and reasonable Christian reactions.

Since human beings were born, stories existed. Even if it dates back to ancient Greece, even though it dates back to ancient Greece, people can learn various kinds of stories that have been told to us. The ancient Greeks wrote articles about God and the theater; the Romans handed Caesar's biography including their accomplishments and failures of life; they made many skepticism about slavery in the United States From social work to movies in society. Mark Twain is considered to be the greatest writer in the realistic literary movement. The interruption of advanced work of romanticism (taking into consideration high-level languages ​​and macro themes influenced by imagination, nature and love) is essentially a bigger realism, writing of a reader-writable worker class audience experience indicate. Times. Our idea is to present a real vision to people and regions - Twain is one of the first people to incorporate authenticity into the story. Twain's character speaks in regional dialects in the novel - this is an intentional break in a more formal language of romantic literature. Please listen to this section. Realism is easy to imagine and brings the story of events and characters that can be related. The main contributor to the age of realism was Mark Twain and his novel 'Adventures of Huckleberry Finn'. Mark Twain took his real life experience into his novel. Twain expressed many beliefs in this social era. Twain accurately and vividly describes settings, place, and feelings. Twain's explanation of the novel's main character morals and events is how the story applies to the most important parts of realism. Father of American literature, Mark Twain, is an excellent person as a writing expert. He used realism in his work and made the story of America based on his life and experience. Twain can also be said to be a humorist. Some may ask why Mark Twain is considered a father ... the 19th century America suffered from war, poverty and massive expansion. In the meantime, novels and American literature became flourishing, and many of the great writers of this era became infamous. Most of these documents are still considered part of the world's most influential written works of art. Students nationwide

In ancient times, there were countries full of strength and strength. As the country, like other military buildup of military forces, the economy seems to be eternal, and as strong as to establish the government on behalf of those people. This seems to be a country setting examples for all countries. This is a prosperous bigger. This is a great Roman Empire. The rules of this country never seem to end, but this is far from the truth. A huge prosperity resulted in a bad straight drop and eventually it collapsed. Like wheat, if two things happen the same way, they tend to fall the same way. So in my opinion, the reason is the decline of Rome like the United States like a rise in economic, social and political aspects, similar to the rise of Rome, the decline of the United States - the reason in terms of ideology in Rome and the USA In the order of most profound similarity,. Of course, this is not a coincidence: establishing fathers, their admirers and students, America hopes to shine in the Potomac River and become a new Rome. Thereafter, the new Rome will not be destined to the same old Roman way till the end - if there is a suitable model to emulate Rome: but I guess they are trying to solve the problem Is not there? Ancient Rome encountered political paralysis like modern America. In Rome, most voters are not a problem. Although it was the emperor of the Roman Empire who entered this political disparity, although it brought domestic stability, it only accelerated the collapse of Rome. For this country political paralysis of a great American patriot may be a melancholy moment, while Scott Crow watches a great opportunity to do great things. "In this country, we have not explored a series of paths along the way," Raven said. "The dominant paradigm tells us that there are cultural, economic, other alternative political life, no choice, we are voters and consumers - this country of more complex social relations" Historians have been fascinated by the decline of great civilizations like ancient Greece and Rome. But for human beings, no more important lessons, rather than the collapse of the United States which has finished the era of virtue invisible in the dark age, and not including autumn than the whole planet. Ultimately even before the birth of the country was released, it destroys the powers of the United States of philosophy. This proposition can also be understood and the sun will not rise tomorrow, "Make sure that it does not become more contradictory Meaning: His philosophical skepticism of David Hume 1748" Investigate human understanding, "I wrote it rises. So we need to waste to prove that falsehood. 1781 ", so I know that it denies knowledge to make room for the necessary faith," he writes the criticism of pure reason Immanuel Kant "he founded, the founding of the United States 5 Published later years

Whether Hamlet's existentialistic view is important to us. What will we do? All of these are issues of existentialism. A dictionary defines existentialism as "an individual's dilemma that must take ultimate responsibility for free will without knowing whether it is good or bad" (Merriam Webster). In William Shakespeare play 'Hamlet', Hamlet can not do anything in our life, time suffers from the concept of leaving everything behind. Hamlet's main confrontation is his existentialistic worldview. Shakespeare is an existentialist, mainly a work on repeated themes and existentialism, and Hamlet is no exception. As a tragedy of revenge, Hamlet was superior in his many aspects of morality, intellectuals, and forced confrontation, and brought about a big psychological impact. Thanks to politician John Wolfgang von Goethe, a famous German writer who accepted Hamlet's invitation. You may be familiar with the metaphor of Goethe's old gemstone In Shakespearean play "Hamlet", you can see a speech or monologue showing Hamlet's emotion. His philosophy is unique as he relies on existential values ​​and life. Hamlet's isolation surpasses the benefits of all the people he is concerned with. His separation from himself, the threat of hostile forces and absurd life have contributed to Hamlet's isolation and existentialism. Due to the urgency of death and the current importance, eventually Hamlet needed to get his own fatal damage and enter the world of the dead. Even an existentialist will now be buried alone and will still be isolated and alienated from the world Hamlet is often seen as a philosophical person who explains what is described as relativity, existentialism, and skepticism. For example, when he told Rosencrantz: "There is neither good nor bad, but by thinking it is so," he expresses a subjective view. There is nothing in the truth except in the minds of individuals rooted in Greek topists. They believe that they can not perceive anything but senses. There is no absolute truth, there is only relative truth. The most obvious example of existentialism lies in the speech "Whether or not".

We believe that the day we can not change the world is a day we believe we can not influence our neighbors; the neighbors that influence us are part of the world. There is a potential trend, politics is not commendable for Christian interactions, and at best it should be kept: law based moral philosophy. I think these opinions are wrong. Politics is a human effort worthy of dialogue with people who hold theology of the Bible. In short, Christians have an obligation to interact in politics. Therefore, this article will first briefly introduce the issue of political obligation. Next, the second part looks at the conceptual problems posed by political obligations, including its implications for political obligations. The third part focuses on skepticism, paying special attention to anarchists who deny political obligations but do not want to abolish the state, which is called philosophy. In Part 4, we survey the main competitors in various political obligation theories currently being provided, summarize the thesis in Part 5, and briefly discuss the recent pluralism or "multi-principle" method proposal To do. In the 20th century, political philosophers focused on a comprehensive attempt to design at least the analysis of political obligations and the concepts involved and the theory of compliance with legal obligations. Some believe that the existence of political obligations can only be determined by concept analysis - we return to this in § 3. More generally, philosophers working in this way try to clarify problems in claiming or denying political obligations or in keeping the law. The immediate problem arising from this concept of political obligation is whether "politics" is a suitable transformationist. If the obligation is to comply with the law, why is not it called a legal obligation if other conditions remain the same? Or, Bhikhu Parekh (1993, p.240), our obligation to comply with the law is actually a matter of citizen's obligation, "respect and protect civic authorities' legal obligation" I do not conclude that there is. The obligation is "not a political obligation," follow the law enacted by the administration "? Parek believes that "politics" is a wider term and that those with real political obligations will bear her politics, not following their laws. Raz 2006, p. 1004) Such people have an active obligation to ensure safety and take measures to promote their own interests.

Postmodern is a very difficult concept to define. A French philosopher defined Postmodernism as "a suspect of all metanarathies", but this basically means skepticism about all claims of absolute truth. The elements and techniques used by postmodern authors raise doubts about their reading experiences and motivate readers to examine their own understanding of life and social value. Postmodern writers use good examples of postmodern compositions such as satire, magical realism, fragmentation of short stories read by women. It refers to famous fuzzy terms, especially literature, postmoderns can be seen as a response to very modern elitism and the fear of the world war. Contemporary literature is characterized by highly separated fragmented culture. The low technology reflects the lack of tradition and structure in the world driven by technology and consumerism. Postwar literature (post modern): Actually, this is the most difficult time to define this time. Especially there is no clear border between modernism and postmodern. But the postwar era of all types such as Samuel Beckett and the absurd drama related to Harold Pinter and the new model in poetry and novel has experimental techniques. Some of British literature's best writers are Philipp Larkin, Ted Hughes, Salman Rushdie, John Fowles, Kazuo Kazuo, Tom Stoppard. The first species of modernism literature was embedded in the emergence of the modern era. Modernity is a historical period of post-traditional or post medieval, characterized by completely transformed from tradition. This is a time to commemorate the emergence of a reasonable age from enlightenment (about 1687 to 1789). Scientists such as Emmanuel Kant, Rene Descartes, and most importantly Isaac Newton, can save the world through science and through their reasons that they can lay the foundation of universal truth believe. Political leaders like Niccolò Machiavelli also revealed modernity. It believes that they can establish peace through rationality and creates large movements such as capitalism, industrialism and urbanization. Talking about postmodern means that modernism is over. It's not. There was no neat borderline. The avant - garde movement in the original literature and art was modernistic, influence of avant - garde continued. You can say that there are new avant - garde. In addition, postmodern is still happening. When something else evolves or replaces it, it may be easier to identify, explain and classify it. Regarding lighting, it is possible to evaluate specific functions of postmodern. For example, there is ignition that is contrary to authority and meaning, and often it is not a type. Here you can quote experimental techniques In the novels shown in the new Rome and anti - novel (q.q.u), these seem dangerously close to just a hoe.

I. INTRODUCTION This paper is an evaluation of Descartes' discussion about our sensory manipulation and the influence of the devil by deception. The second part is an explanation of the way of doubt and how it proceeds to the third part that evaluates progress through evil spirits. Fourth, how can people reach the conclusion that they are skeptical and evil discussions, are still present, and ideas? Descartes was skeptical at the first two mediation. Descartes first solves radical skepticism implied by an evil devilish argument by deciding that he is intellectual essence. According to Descartes, this "I" self-view is born, we are born, even a demon can not be doubted. Despite the evil demons' claims, Descartes does not deny the existence of God. The way Descartes presented the argument made the devil coexist with the god. So when his heart is deceived or given incorrect information, it is not from God but from the devil. From this skeptical argument, people will doubt the existence of the outside world. If the devil really exists, the only part of our existence may be our idea. Therefore, the outside world where we live in this world does not exist, it means just a miracle where our demons are placed in our hearts. Naturally, this sounds unreasonable for any ordinary person, but it is the world that Descartes may be in doubt in his common beliefs. An evil demon 's claim is Descartes' most extreme argument. He proposed a concept of a malicious god. This malicious god is proposed to be responsible for sensual fraud. It can be inferred that fraud can cast doubts on the idea of ​​the world. So even under the same conditions you can even doubt the existence of a person (later Descartes uses his 'Cogito ergo sum' statement to dispute this). Descartes believes that even posterior knowledge may be the result of carefully manipulated and controlled implanted fraud by malice. He believes that this god is evil as it relates to lies, and that the benevolent God is not evil

Archbishop of Desmond Tutu once said: "People are others through others." The people we meet are what we are today, the conflicts we encounter, the situation and time, and what they offer It is support to. That is our character. Desmond Tutu Archbishop and his ideas agree that Richard Wright and Elie Wiesel in Blackboy have been told through important ideas such as Milgram experiments and Maslow's request level. Among the black boys of Richard Wright, Richard experienced many incidents and collided with other people who decided to have their own personality at that time. With such clichés, history is indispensable to our daily lives, which makes us today. It teaches us lessons - because they are based on real events sometimes experienced by real people. History lessons are important for all students, as this alone is enough to emphasize the importance of history in our lives. We passively delete negative people from our lives. Some people make us happy, filled with energy and inspiration, we absorb new skills and we are looking forward to meeting anyone. Some people are still exhausted and they bring us their own anxieties, fears and negative emotions. Even if the latter is our boss, relatives, friends, spouses, we should stop spending time with them. I am not trying to fix another person. It is hard enough to restore yourself. If we often feel fear, stress, frustration, negativity, and skepticism to others, our brain structure does harmful things for us due to long-term damage is. This is harmful - many scientific evidences (see all studies above). We can be better, but it will take time and energy I am thankful to all who are who we are and our way. Our achievements today are the joint efforts of our previous generation. We define by dialogue with others. Romantically, socially, professionally, or politically, we are the sum of all exchanges with others. All of us are connected to each other, we are talking beyond what we think. In the field of physics and the field of metaphysical experience - our idea transforms, transforms and interlaces into a huge universal consciousness. My previous identity has changed and it is changing to the next stage of evolution. As I said, the floor is covered with windows, radiators, mats, and dozens of Bohemian, those who often use "deep" and "fashion" still believe people. Before today's sarcasm, world peace is possible. They were pushed into the crowded house of my parents, listened interestingly, drank all the words of those extraordinary men, and all young idealists went to a room in the Middle East Easter People who have never tasted hummus may not have lived

Oscar Wilde's "Dorian Gray picture", which first published pop culture in Lippincott magazine, caused direct controversy among Victorian critics (Introduction xvi - xviii). The Victorian era, named after Queen Victoria in England, is equivalent to a strict ethical principle - media, family and government are consumed by godless cliches. Meanwhile, suggestive things like literally fables are strictly suppressed, women are covered with jaws, reach out to the ankle, piano and legs are covered on the floor. Sports that peaked in the 1890s - symbolism, decline and aesthetics, the most famous examples are Paris and Beardsley's MALALME, Toulouse Lautrec and Debussy, Charles Condor and British Oscar Wilde. These ideas and concerns - indeed, the influence of ideology - have been affecting the creation of modernism for decades. Expression does not refer to the change itself, but in this case, many people define it as the First World War, but that will come. Pessimism afflicts poets such as Conrad, Thomas Hardy, Matthew Arnold and TS Some of the reasons for Eliot were promoted by the decline of religious beliefs and evolutionists such as scientists, philosophers, and Darwin It is general skepticism. The main purpose of this project is to discuss Catherine Mansfield and Oscar Wilde's aesthetics and aesthetic at the end of the century. The proposed research will also analyze her contemporaryistic skills in symbolic language and consider her main theme from an aesthetic and political point of view. The main focus of this research is to negotiate two, usually opposite, important values, aesthetics and politics. Artists' negotiations on contradictions between art (art) and politics (society) are criticisms of controversial 'modern': all serious artists and critics faced this problem from the late nineteenth century , I have addressed consciously. As this common concern for delicate relationships between art, life and society is increasing, the aesthetics and symbols of Findesiècle form the mainstream of modernism. French symbolism presents aesthetics to Wild and Mansfield, allowing them to achieve their own aesthetics. Art and Society: Consider the relationship between Catherine · Mansfield and Oscar · Wild's aesthetic theory and social responsibility Artists who may represent a hedonistic artist for their work would like to express the limits of humanity or intellectual freedom. I can not think about the opposition to Oscar Wilde's view that all the effects are immoral. All effects are certainly immoral, as it is an external factor that causes us to lose some degree of own identity.

It is a very poorly and light criticism of Tom Wolf's (apparently) medieval architecture from Bauhaus to our house. A serious architect fired it. It is (obviously) criticism of lightweight social design. A serious design critic ignores it. I think this is very interesting and very focused. Wolfe is a surprisingly excellent author of a new news style. He even described it as part of architectural criticism. I think he is wrong. I think that it is a fable to go to our house from Bauhaus. Designers advertise themselves, their preference is higher than their customers, who will use and use their designs? In other words, what happens when a designer tries to fix a person. In this case, the modification means that Bauhaus goes beyond the bourgeoisie and raises people's hobbies. Skepticism about modernism is not limited to the UK. In the United States, Tom Wolf wrote from Bauhaus to our house, from Bauhaus directly to the United States to explain the Prince of European silver, he wrote that he built houses that look like worker's house and pesticide factory. Reliable point He suggested that any attempt to actually sit on the Le Corbusier's reclining chair would adopt karate behind his neck. "In modernism attacks on inhumane behavior, and in the extreme case anything that can be filled with contemporary nicknames has concluded that modernism can not find beauty and that it is not worth it. I thought, "Wilk said. The mind still believes in the early moral mission of modernists. Therefore, the crime of a concrete tower where Le Corbusier's design is inadequate and construction is inadequate has little to do with his work. Among all of Tom Wolf's diving, he promised to tidy up the chaos for all and all at once. Mr. Wolf's "From Bauhaus to our house" like 1975's "Words of Painting" is a theoretical structure surrounding artistic creation and a long article in a book trying to adopt rhetorical clouds is. In the early books, his argument was that the theory of American painting after the war became more important than the painting itself - indeed, this was the reason for painting, and the work Mr. Wolf found himself It is totally inaccessible, or at least unpleasant

Then he said that "I showed this existence" by reaching out that "This is a hand". Moore will then boldly examine the reason why everyone makes such a reasonable claim in the example of his hand. Wittgenstein praised the claim that Moore is doing one hand, but Wittgenstein uses the view that the individual believes that the assertion he knows is questionable. More, you may say that he is challenging Moore's approach to better responding to skepticism. He starts this by pointing out obvious facts and arguments may not be that effective if your discussion relies on assertions like "This is a hand". In this section, we will focus on Wittgenstein's "certainty" content. Certainty is the main epistemological study of Wittgenstein. It includes 676 short comments on beliefs, certainty, and most importantly the knowledge and topics being claimed to be known. These remarks are greatly hinted by two articles by G.E. Moore: "Advocacy of Common Sense" (DCS) and "Certificate of the External World" (PEW), so I will explain the various aspects of these papers, especially Wittgenstein's paper. answer Since the 20th century, many philosophers have denied the idea that knowledge is a state of mind. For example, Ludwig Wittgenstein (1889-1951) stated "About certainty" in 1969, "Knowledge" and certainty belong to different categories. They are not two mental states like guess and affirmation. "A philosopher who denies knowledge usually points out that it is a characteristic of a state of mind such as doubt and suffering, and in those conditions they are saying that they are above them I know something like this and I doubt that everyone knows it. Ludwig Wittgenstein, Ludwig Joseph John Wittgenstein (born April 26, 1889, Vienna, Austria - Hungary - 29 April 1951, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK) UK born in Austria Philosophers were considered by many as the greatest philosopher of the 20th century. Two major works of Wittgenstein, Logisch-philosophische Abhandlung (1921; Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, 1922) and Philosophische Untersuchungen (published in 1953 and later published; Philosophical Studies) have numerous secondary literature and formal philosophy Stimulated follow-up development has done a lot of work, especially in traditional analysis. In addition, his charismatic character has a strong influence even for artists, playwrights, poets, novelists, musicians, even filmmakers, so his reputation far exceeds the scope of academic life It is.

Now, as you join student workers, if you belong to a labor union, the role of trade unions to study labor unions to earn a living, or make the capitalist society more fair and democratic If you broadly support, you will soon understand the promise of modern liberalism. Why Individual rights, equality, and voice that dominates people's lives are supported by all possible identity groups, but they remain at the door of the factory gate and office. People like me are supporting the collective actions of workers to rectify the unfair rights at work, so they are accustomed to the illegal status of the union and its skepticism. The labor force of the labor union organization in the United States influences the lives of many citizens everyday. Trade unions are affecting a wide range of people, from blue-collar workers to white-collar workers, full-time mothers, students and retirees. Although few, we recognize the labor union in the financial system, the political situation, and the legal role which the society as a whole continues to fulfill. In today's society, our technical time and unskilled workers are more formal Based on industrial working conditions such as labor's knights, American labor union, American railway federation, international women's clothing industrial association, industries, etc., students have tried workers' labor union between 1870 and 1920 I will study. Workers in the world, taking into account the actions the labor union and the correspondence to these behaviors. Committee • Jungle and Meat Testing Methods of Upton Sinclair • Margaret Sanger and Birth Limit • History of Ida Taber's Standard Oil Company • Booker Washington on Education Including Lynch Creative Education on Ida Wells and his African American The job Tupamaros was founded in the early 1960s by Marxist lawyer and activist Raúl Sendic. When the workers were constantly suppressed, Sendic knew he would never achieve his goal peacefully. On May 5, 1962, Sendik and a small number of sugarcane workers attacked and burned Uruguayan federal government building in Montevideo. The only victim was a nursing student Dora Isabel Lópezde Oricchio who made a mistake at the wrong time. According to many people, this is the first action of Tupamaros. However, Tupamaros itself pointed out the attack on the Swiss cancer club in 1963, which is their first act.

By the early eighteenth century American colonies had a clear sense that the disorganized society was too confident and confident and forgot the original intention of religious prosperity. As a result, religious devout revival occurred that wiped out the American colonies in the 1730s and 1870s, and this movement was called "great awakening". This resurrection is part of the simultaneous evangelical proliferation in the UK, Scotland, Germany, and other residents of the Atlantic. Definition of big awakening. A big awakening is an era of religious awakening and reform. This is a series of religious resurrections that struck the American colonies led by Evangelical Protestant pastors. The great awakening was caused by a trip to the UK gospel minister, George Whitefield. The first big awakening began in 1725 and continued until 1750. The second awakening began in the early 1800s. The third and fourth Renaissance inspired by the great awakening took place from 1880 to 1910 and from the late 1960s to the early 1970s. In this article I will explain the first and second waking up in American colonial era. Historians said that the first awakening of the 1730s and the 1740s and the second awakening in the third awakening of the late 1950s and early 20th century. These renaissance was a part of the big romantic religious movement that struck mainly England, Scotland, and Germany, mainly in Europe. Just like the first big wake up half a century ago, the second reflection of romanticism is characterized by the passion for supernaturality, emotion and charm. It rejected skepticism, naturalism, and rationalism left from enlightenment. Almost at the same time, similar movements also flourished in Europe. Pietism swept the German countries. Evangelism in the UK is very strong The second awakening resurrection began in New England in the 1790s. The general feeling is lower than the big awakening, the second awakening leads to the establishment of universities and seminary, and to the organization of Church of Mission. During this period, the state of Kentucky was also influenced by the resurgence ... Another resurgence, the second awakening (about 1795-1835) began in the United States. During this revival, meetings were held in small towns and large cities across the country, a unique border agency - camp meeting began. The second big awakened created tremendous growth

Plato's philosophy has influenced the development and guidance of Plato from Socrates to further develop Plato's philosophy that influenced today's thinking. Plato was born in Athens in 348. Plato was born in Thargelion (May to June) from 428 BC to July. Ariston and Perici. He died at the age of 88 in 348 - 7 BC. The birth of Plato appeared in the fourth year of the Alkodacia War. His influence was profound from the beginning to the present when he advocated the important problems and concepts that philosophy, psychology, logic, and political science faced. Philosophically, Plato was influenced by the tradition of skepticism including question of his teacher Socrates who was also a star of Plato's dialogue. For many early Greek philosophers it is clear that we live in a world that is not a truly simple source, that is eternal, unchangeable knowledge. The world is constantly changing. The season reflects the change. There is nothing permanent. The building collapses, people, animals, and trees live and die. Even now it is deceiving: our sight, tactile sense, taste sometimes makes us disappoint. Water that looks like a desert horizon is actually a miracle. Or maybe it will be sweet the next time. Heraclitus is a former Socratic philosopher who asserts that we can never enter the same river twice. Plato is his name and he is one of the most influential people in history as a Socrates student and an excellent philosopher about the influence of Western civilization. Born in Greece in 427 BC Plato grew up in a wealthy and noble family. When his teacher and other great Greek philosopher Socrates was tried and executed in 399 BC, he became a philosopher. Plato wrote many articles about Socrates in his ancient Greek work. - ... he ridiculed the advice of Meletos and other people, they are so young that they can better understand human benefits and disadvantages. Therefore, when Socrates told the court that he would never give up on the principles of others or his life's beliefs, he said he was ready to make a decision and pay his 500 fellows in Athens' compatriots . . belief

The secularized ethics can be defined as "basic principles of correct behavior, especially with respect to specific people, occupations, etc." But Christian ethics can not be simply defined. The moral values ​​of Christianity can not be reduced to a series of rules that are easy to follow. "Christian ethics is basically a question of theater played in the creation of God and the purpose of redemption to the world. Secular ethics is the difference between morality and morality followed by the worldly world. These rules and morals tend to be overlooked by religious communities and are considered "evil". However, secular ethics plays an important role in today's society. Without them, the world will be filled with confusion and civilization. Secular ethics are the laws of our government and various social impacts / rewards for people who infringe / obey them are also included. They are the driving force behind the secular population, making the world a better place, essentially making everyone happy and entering a better society. essay.com/Secular ethics - Why is practical rather than religious ethics in today's society? (Persuasive article) Secular Ethics - Why are they more practical than religious ethics in today's society? (Persuasive article) Secular ethics is not a so - called supernatural revelation or guidance, but a moral philosophy that ethics is based only on human abilities such as scientific rationality, social biology, or ethical intuition. Secular ethics includes various moral and ethical systems, including consequentialism, liberal ideology, humanism, secular humanism, and utilitarianism. Most secular moral concepts are logical deductions of the acceptance of natural rights and social contracts and more individualized forms of intrinsic value due to things, the establishment of Kantianese moral intuitionism or preference It is based on. Like Occam's razor, another one. Please also consider ways such as moral egoism, moral relativism, moral skepticism, moral nihilism.

Expressionism and opposition to realism - Kant, Davidson and Roti (1) Abstract: The concept of expressionism and anti-expression is introduced in the discussion of contemporary philosophy of Richard Drotti to explain him and the new pragmatism I was wrong. Attitudes towards traditional epistemological problems Roti means that the history of philosophy indicates that there is no final answer to traditional knowledge, truth, and representation; therefore, they are rejected It should be. Richard Rorty argued that contemporary analytical philosophy in a philosophical and natural mirror inadvertently imitates scientific methods. In addition, he condemns traditional epistemological viewpoint of expressionism and its corresponding theory, which depends on knowledge and independence of observer phenomena and passivity of natural phenomena and consciousness. As a supporter of anti-fundamentalism and anti-essentialism in the framework of pragmatism, he responded to postmodernism of traditionalism and relativism, but he responded to most postmodern ideas and his social liberalism I opposed the commitment. This 144 page book has a title that may lead people to introductory, but while summarizing McIntyre 's theme, the author also considers other philosophers such as Donald Davidson, especially Richard Roti Use. In order to understand McIntyre's idea, readers unfamiliar with Davidson and Rorty may find it difficult to understand this material. These essays are very broad, including a paper on the concept of justice in MacIntyre, an explanation of his liberalism, his interpretation of Aquinas, and criticism of his Enlightenment. The last chapter is written by MacIntyre himself; entitled "Partial Response to My Critics", it provides McIntyre's response to some of the criticism raised by other authors. (Motivation to interact with McKintal's critics is rare and worthy of praise) From Peirce and James to Rorty and Davidson, pragmatists have sought empiricism to purify Descartes' remains. For example, they claim that empiricism deprives the spiritual understanding Rock, Berkeley, and Hume inherited from Descartes. According to this Cartesianism, thinking is completely subjective and private that its content of "thinking" or "impression" is irrevocable, completely separated from the objective world being publicized when they express ing. . Accepting this world of mind, experientists have to face the long series of difficult questions - loneliness, skepticism, realism, idealism -.

Let's learn about Descartes's skepticism. In order to begin to understand René Descartes' suspicion, it is necessary to stop prejudice and earlier judgment and start with a clean list of "to discover some of the ultimate truths based on all ideas" (Kolak , Pg. 225). Descartes is skeptical of his beliefs and is embarrassed about his ignorance. He began to complete the task of finding absolute truth. Among them he is based on his beliefs. 1637 - Descartes' method papers were published with one of the classical papers of this century. These articles appeared shortly after Galileo condemned and decided that Descartes would not release his huge "world". The importance of combining words with intermediaries is almost not exaggerated. 1638 - The second book by Galileo, mainly "Two new scientific discourses", was published by Protestant Leiden outside Italy. This work attracted the work on Galileo's previous sports and the second "new science" (in retrospect, Galileo was not so successful) dealt with the strength of the material. René Descartes, Methodology, Galileo Galilei, Letters to Tuscany Christina: Pope's interrogation in 1633: Galileo "Sir Isaac Newton", "Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy" Manuel Kant, What is Enlightenment , Dennis Diderot, "Observations of encyclopedias of art and science" Voltaire, philosophical dictionary: British model, Mary Worthcraft, advocacy of women's rights, Jean Jacques Rousseau, association contract Descartes in "methodology" support his argument for immortality of the soul through different arguments. In methodology, Descartes is trying to explain his reasoning method. He explains the development of this approach through a short autobiographical sketch combined with philosophical arguments. Descartes has five parts in his "methodology", which shifts his argument from light theory to human structure theory. Descartes is thinking about the fact that animals resemble humans, as animals have many organs like humans, separating them from humans is a lack of speech or reasoning power. He regards this difference as evidence of a human "rational or calm soul". He observes the mysterious relationship between the soul and the human body and concludes that the soul must live outside the human body.

The following content about Plato Athens' complaint actually hurts. But for Plato's ongoing promotional activities by Athenians and his partner, I feel that it is my responsibility to write this article. However, before studying the current situation, it is important to clear the darkness in Plato's heart. One of his slaves once said, "Things have never been so good." Of course, this is quite interesting, but I did not include this sentence just to make you laugh. Plato was born in 428 BC to 427 BC, probably in Athens, when Athens' democracy developed very well. He is affluent and belongs to a family of aristocrats. Because Plato's family is involved in the politics of Athens, Plato is probably not unfamiliar with politics itself. He is also the founder of the Athens Academy. This can be regarded as the first university and its first philosophy school in western European countries. He passed away from 348 BC to 347 BC. Philosophically, Plato was influenced by the tradition of skepticism including question of his teacher Socrates who was also a star of Plato's dialogue. For many early Greek philosophers it is clear that we live in a world that is not a truly simple source, that is eternal, unchangeable knowledge. The world is constantly changing. The season reflects the change. There is nothing permanent. The building collapses, people, animals, trees live and die The following content about Plato Athens' complaint actually hurts. But for Plato's ongoing promotional activities by Athenians and his partner, I feel that it is my responsibility to write this article. However, before studying the current situation, it is important to clear the darkness in Plato's heart. One of his slaves once said, "Things have never been so good." - I complained about Plato 's Athenians. I tried to keep quiet, but I can not take it anymore. I must tell you I will not succumb to the threat of compulsion, intimidation or violence. But first, I have to talk a while ago, I have to talk about how stubborn and cynical I am about me, and Plato's nonsense, fraud, misbehavior and cheating It is enough. Then I will back up and fill in some details

According to the latest clever idea of ​​a favorite author, readers spend about 5 million hours a month on the month. Today we are introducing a new type of story to the media for readers who can not wait for the next article: series. A series is a mobile story that can be added over time and the card is expanded by clicking on the card. This is the first step to build a new reading, seamless and serialization. This is a new way to tell a deeper meaningful story that has evolved over time. The majority of the content we create today on the Internet today must exist independently - the context can not be guaranteed. However, the series has changed. You can share more complicated ideas deeper and tell stories you can not tell you in the post. Even if inspiration is temporary, it can be with time, you can start the series at any time and join when you come up with a new idea. This is the fourth of the series I called "Second Wave Internet Skeptics." The second wave of doubts about the Internet seems to have broken up tribalism pretending to be critical thinking. That includes many of the rhetoric that I saw for the first time in the "male movement" movement. This same rhetoric can also be seen in contemporary Neo-Nazi movement known as "alt right". These men (I mean men, mainly white people) have discovered that the truth of 9/11 and chemicals are nonsense, since they have found feminism, the transgender's rights and so on It is nonsense. I think that the idea I proposed here and many of the skeptics can not agree, but that is a good thing. Many of the exercises believe that "safe space" is destroying everything, but I generally dislike criticism the second wave of Internet skepticism. Hypocrisy and recognition of one's own victim is well documented here It is a very bad idea fight.

The public life of political public servants is characterized by other duties and obligations, not private life. There is also contradiction between human public duties and private obligations. The focus of this white paper is to test whether this difference in responsibility is regarded as the impact of various forms of obligation. You can talk about a particular form of political obligation in the same way Kant distinguishes moral and legal obligations. Do you agree that the theoretical political obligation requires liberal democracy? At first glance, the answer seems to depend on a confirmed consent token. It is clear that if registration is approved by voting, society must be democratic in order to have political obligations to citizens. On the other hand, if consent is represented only by residence, freedom of rights and freedom - freedom of speech, democracy etc. - seems to be irrelevant to consent and political obligation issues. Therefore, this article will first briefly introduce the issue of political obligation. Next, the second part looks at the conceptual problems posed by political obligations, including its implications for political obligations. The third part focuses on skepticism, paying special attention to anarchists who deny political obligations but do not want to abolish the state, which is called philosophy. In Part 4, we survey the main competitors in various political obligation theories currently being provided, summarize the thesis in Part 5, and briefly discuss the recent pluralism or "multi-principle" method proposal To do. The immediate problem arising from this concept of political obligation is whether "politics" is a suitable transformationist. If the obligation is to comply with the law, why is not it called a legal obligation if other conditions remain the same? Or, Bhikhu Parekh (1993, p.240), our obligation to comply with the law is actually a matter of citizen's obligation, "respect and protect civic authorities' legal obligation" I do not conclude that there is. The obligation is "not a political obligation," follow the law enacted by the administration "? Parek believes that "politics" is a wider term and that those with real political obligations will bear her politics, not following their laws. Raz 2006, p. 1004) Such people have an active obligation to ensure safety and take measures to promote their own interests.

Pureness of Desiderius Erasmus and Cannibals and silly praise of civilization In desiderius Erasmus's "stupid praise" and Michel de Montaigne's "eating race", in some cases to the nature the actual civilization of that need Research has been confirmed. First of all, Erasmus said, "Destroying illusions is truly confusing the entire game, masks and costumes are the eyes of spectators." The desire to propose clear contracts among people - This can be called meaningful Michel de Montaigne's article "Cannibals", Michel de Montaigne said: "According to our criteria, this is truly barbarian, as they describe the Brazilians in the article" Cannibals "in the 1580 article I have to do this completely or we have to do so There is a remarkable distance between their roles and our character "(158). - Descartes' free will to think the first philosophy In my first philosophical thinking, Descartes led the reader to practice methodology in philosophical exploration. After robbing all the wisdom of doubt and false beliefs, he reexamined the nature and structure of existence and tried to universally obtain a valid epistemology without skepticism. Michel de Montaigne wrote in his article "On Cannibals" that local residents in Brazil "sometimes get sad because they lived in a very pure state, so they could not understand at an early stage." In fact, they are respectable people who are unknown to them saying "lies, rebellion, fraud, greed, jealousy, jealousy". A century and a half later, Jean Jacques Rousseau will explain his ideas about the fall of mankind from grace when this species exchanges the tribal nature for social hostility and selfish conspiracy. He believes that this early stage holds "the best of mankind." In his novel "Emile", he sought to maintain these stunning virtues despite systematic destruction I proposed an educational method.

Swift and the papers' written problems, after a major revolution in the 18th century, are far more serious in the printing industry than in civil war until to a certain extent. This is chaotic, the lower class struggling writers write in magazines, newspapers, magazines, etc. When consuming a large amount of these works, Grub Street (literary London street), such as a small history writer, dictionary, poetry, was formed. The world of fashion and skepticism encourages satirical art. The main poets of this era, Samuel Butler, John Dryden, Alexander Pope, Samuel Johnson, and Irish poet Jonathan Swift wrote a satirical poem. Their sarcasm is often to protect the public order and the established church and the government. However, writers such as the Pope use their satirical gifts to criticize the social atrocities committed by the government they see or create strict work depending on their critics. The Pope's "The Dunciad" is a satirical massacre of his two literary opponents (Lewis Theobald and Colley Cibber in later versions) and that the British society is disjointed in morality, culture and intelligence It expresses views. Pope and Swift are known for their sharp insights, and they all see the classic past masters of rationalism, their rhetoric and their independent satirical prototypes. In his "Rock of Rape", the Pope is the voice of Horatians, he lifts the mirror through the mirrors of the upper class foolishness and vanity, and slightly blames the society with a mean and elegant voice. The Pope did not actively attack the magnificence of British aristocracy's self-esteem, but as the reader has a new view that the behavior in the story can be easily thought of as being stupid and stupid We presented. The gentle ridicule of the upper class is more subtle and lyrical than his cruel counterpart, and the Pope still can effectively clarify the moral degeneration of the society to the public. The satirical tone of Swift depends on communicating information to realism and strictness sharper than his companion and fully demonstrates Juvenalian's satire and absurd ability.

Descartes believes that the mind and body are two separate entities. Since the body occupies space, it can always be splitable, and since the mind consists of irrelevant ideas, it is inseparable. Using the idea behind Leibniz's law, "different attributes, different things", Descartes began to assemble his argument as he believed his thought and body were completely different. I will review the reason why he thinks he can not divide but thinks he can not do it. Descartes' first meditation included several discussions on Descartes research and analysis. It is his argument that I feel fraud that I chose to analyze. The actual discussion is as follows. (1) My senses may deceive me. (2) If my feelings deceive me, that may always deceive me. (3) If my feelings always deceive me, I do not know the belief I gained through my senses. (4) If you do not know the belief gained through your own senses, you need to stop judging about that belief. Descartes' first meditation, his main purpose was to present three skeptical arguments to doubt his beliefs in his basic beliefs. Descartes regards this as a complex part of his complete epistemological argument. Descartes's skeptical debate is not to deny his basic belief. Instead, he used these arguments to prove the existence of God, one of his major arguments. One of the main premises that Descartes used to prove the existence of God came from the demonic debate he proposed in his first meditation. It is the claim of this demon that is subject to the following discussion. Descartes was skeptical at the first two mediation. Descartes first solves radical skepticism implied by an evil devilish argument by deciding that he is intellectual essence. According to Descartes, this "I" self-view is born, we are born, even a demon can not be doubted.

The direct starting point of Plato's philosophical speculation is the teaching of Socrates. When Socrates tried to define the term of knowledge to refute skepticism of refinement, he taught that the only true knowledge is to acquire knowledge through concepts. He said that this concept represents all the reality of one thing. As Socrates uses, this is merely the principle of knowledge. Plato regards it as the existence principle. "If this concept represents all the reality of things, the reality needs to be in an ideal order, not necessarily the objects themselves, but among them among themselves" (Chaput, C. p . 2). So, for this concept Plato has been replaced ... See more This is the work of philosophy. "Therefore, philosophy is trying to rise from phenomena or external knowledge to ontology or reality" (Chaput, C. p. 4) The view of Hume's philosophical thinking thinks that there are considerable differences in the perception of the heart when people feel overheating pain or warmth of warmth but this is caused by his imagination Is expected. These ideas look like one thing, but they can not reach the origin of thinking. Hume believes that when these feelings fell on us it can be said that we are almost watching whether it feels it. According to Hume, when we reflect past feelings and emotions, our idea is a faithful mirror and truly duplicates their purpose. He now believes that we can divide all spiritual perceptions into two categories or species. Lower coercion and vigor is often called thought or thought. Other species require names of languages, but other species do not have a specific purpose in philosophy. "So, we can use a bit of freedom, called impression, in a sense, using that word is different from usual" (Hume, 316). When we think about any of the emotions and behaviors above, the impression is different from the idea, and the idea is not so sharp awareness. At first glance, it seems nothing. David Hume and Rene Descartes are philosophers who oppose the origins of ideas. Descartes thinks that there are three kinds of ideas: a birth, a coincidence, and an imaginary thing. He said that God exists because of his existence, and from his thoughts on what is perfect like God. On the other hand, Hume thinks that one thought comes only from the impression. Both theories have advantages and disadvantages, but I prefer Hume's theory over Descartes. Descartes believes imagination can not help humans. The definition of Descartes' thinking exists in thinking, only things that represent other things are called thinking. His argument is that the essence of thinking that constitutes the heart can get God's idea, but on the contrary, humans can think about God in other ways. One of the main advantages of Descartes is his view of objective reality, which is a reality view. This article explains the similarities and differences between Rene Descartes and John Locke, David Hume and Plato. They each believe in rationalism or empiricism. Rationalists, in contrast to experience, think that a series of important basic concepts are intuitively and intuitively known. For rationalists, is knowledge born? From information sources such as sensation. They are known as Descartes, Plato. Experiors believe that all conceptual tracking ultimately returns to experiences such as perception and emotion. What? There are no ideas or concepts without impressions or emotions. What?

From comments: Webb offers coherent, easy-to-understand, possibly humorous coverage of various topics. He provides readers with unobvious insights into the field of research they may have never encountered so far. . . Everyone who thinks about the possibilities of other smart civilizations elsewhere in the galaxy would like "I wonder where everyone is". With this very understandable amount, they will agree a lot of people and will find many discussions. Considering the size and age of the universe, four world - class scientists agreed to the Loos Alamos lunchtime conversation that took place more than 50 years ago. Advanced extraterrestrial civilization must exist. Pure numbers need it. But one of the four famous physicists and the calculator behind it, Enrico Fermi, raised doubts. Quoting: In this lively thinking chirp book, Stephen Weber discusses the 50 most compelling and interesting answers to Fermi's famous questions divided into three different groups: - Aliens Already in the middle of us. These answers include Leo Syrard's suggestion that they are already here. They are Hungarian, theorists claiming that aliens made statues of Stonehenge and Easter Island. - Aliens exist but they are not communicating. The theory of this camp is from those who believe that we do not have the technology to receive signals, those who believe that the great role of space and time does not contribute to communication, and they are hidden in the surroundings There are a wide range of people who think. - There are no aliens. The following are arguments of skeptics, from rare earth theory to the author's own in-depth discussion and clear expression of skepticism. The suggested solution covers everything from crazy to serious, but that is worthy of our consideration. From leading scientists, philosophers, historians, science fiction writers - Various controversies for those interested in the full enjoyment of science and speculative thinking are amazing and energetic. Intellectual practice Stephen Webb is a physicist at the Open University in the UK and is the author of the measuring universe. He issued the "measurement of the universe - the ladder of the cosmological distance" and in 1999, if the universe is full of aliens, "First edition so ... ....: the most famous physicist Stephen Webb is the author of a popular science book In 2002, "Fermi's paradox and 50 solutions to extraterrestrial life problems", "get out of this world - 2004 physics and universe, Blanes, Strings, Other Wild Collisions "concept and" New perspective in the universe - 12 universe mysteries "and tools that need to be resolved in 2012 I want to know why we are still in the universe even if we return to the present. From the statistics, the universe should be full of alien species, but where is it? This is called Fermi's paradox. One version of this problem's "big filter" is that when reaching a certain level of technology, all intelligent living eventually self-destroys. If this is our fate, it also means the inverse relationship between technology and wisdom. Please make another excuse under the category "Alien is dead". The universe may be filled with kind planets, but there is no guarantee that they will be long enough to evolve life. According to a survey of 2016 by the Australian National University, a damp rocky planet like the Earth was very unstable when I started my career. You can roll the ball in a very limited window (hundreds of millions of years). The authors of the research write as follows. "Life can be rare in the universe, not because it is difficult to start, because it is difficult to maintain a living environment in the first 10 years."

Enlightenment was an era of the 18th century when philosophy and cultural life changed. The exercise began in France and spread to the UK, Italy, Spain, Portugal and Germany at the same time These ideas began with the most famous thinkers and philosophers of the time and eventually shared with the public. Enlightenment is a way of focusing on human improvement by logic and reason rather than absurdity and superstition. This way of thinking shows skepticism in front of religion, challenging inequality between the king and the people, and trying to establish a sound moral system. The idea behind ... shows more content According to Stockstad, these ideas were born from the scientific revolution of the last century, philosophers such as Francis Bacon and Descartes established a scientific method based on the logical reasoning we now know . Experiment to prove these ideas. Astronomer Galileo Galilei confirmed the previous theory of Nicolaus Copernicus that the sun is another way instead of going around the Earth - the planet revolves around the sun. These theories and practices are contrary to the teaching of the Church, especially when Galileo was forced to regain what he said in his view. Other scientists have found on smaller scales related to the animal kingdom and plant life, and artists are used to conveying new discoveries by drawing or drawing these findings. (P. 756) Due to the various revolutions and events that occurred before the 18th century, it can be said that enlightenment is only a logical advance and the next step. Like the previous scientific revolution, the new enlightenment philosophy was disseminated through both art and text, like the encyclopedia of Dennis Diderot sold to the middle class of France printed. The encyclopedia has the latest view on the advantages of art, science and human freedom. Due to this progress Age of Enlightenment is an age of scientific awakening, and Age of Enlightenment mainly developed in France. The starting point of enlightenment is John Rock's book on human understanding. Enlightenment attacked the leaders of the church and focused on problems that were avoided in the past. Trying to challenge the church takes courage. As the Church said, enlightenment let people ask questions such as "Earth is the center of the universe." - These journals impair these authoritative sources - through knowledge and reasons - suggesting a source of new knowledge. The history of the French Academy of Sciences during enlightenment began with the Academy of Sciences in Paris in 1666. As several clerics (13%) show, the academic community shows an increasing interest in science and its secularization. The era of enlightenment, sometimes called the age of reason, refers to the time that leads the movement of thought called enlightenment. During enlightenment, people insisted on it as a means of establishing authoritative aesthetics, ethics, government and even religion. Some people think that the reasons allow people to get objective truth about reality - <http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Age_of_Enlightenment> (May 5, 2010 Day Access). 60 Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau among them can be said to have made the most important contribution to the development of liberalism by announcing some pioneering work on liberalism. These works are J Rousseau Social Contract, two articles on citizen's government by T Hobbes Leviathan, J Locke. Later philosophers such as Kant and Rawls further developed these ideas. The focus is different from philosophers and philosophers, but the central idea of ​​social contract remains unchanged.

The rise in the cost of class dispute universities is becoming increasingly expensive, and the students are working hard to make a living. Brigit M. just graduated from a public university in southern New Jersey and won the GPA. She is a full time student and works as a waitress outside the school and works as a leader in economics and writing on campus 8 to 12 hours a week. Brigit received a scholarship but did not pay other fees such as books, transportation expenses, medical expenses. She has an employer who works according to school schedule, but she is having difficulty going home from work at 11 pm. Students and parents often find myself lamenting the university's university price tag and the university tuition fee is steadily rising. According to the National Education Statistics Center, the annual average cost of the university in 1981 was $ 3,101 if the tuition fee of the university was adjusted according to inflation. However, in 2011, this figure was $ 18,497. Although the rise in the cost of the university is complicated, the rise in the cost of the university may have a particularly serious blow to economically difficult students. According to the report by the American Institute in 2012, taxpayer subsidies for public universities in 2010 have been lower than in the previous year. Budget cuts have given a particularly serious blow to public agencies, and schools often have to raise their tuition fees to pay them. Even in private schools, if you reduce the education budget, access to subsidies and similar subsidies will be restricted so you may lose money. These budget cuts to promote tuition fees may also lead to students and their families faced with their budget cuts. The rise in the cost of class dispute universities is becoming increasingly expensive, and the students are working hard to make a living. Brigit M. completed a public university in southern New Jersey with 4.0 GPA. She is a full time student and works as a waitress outside the school and works as a leader in economics and writing on campus 8 to 12 hours a week. Brigit received a scholarship but did not pay other fees such as books, transportation expenses, medical expenses. - University is not easy, in fact, it is terrible. It is a little hard work and work can be overwhelming. We all go to university for various reasons. The main reason why I went to university was to receive higher education. Our students have got used to promoting to higher education such as university, but after all it really is worthwhile. Everyone has heard stories of parents' voices, students full of seemingly unbearable loan debt, and politicians suffering from the American middle class. This is the most common question posed by commentators on my article on GOP's skepticism in higher education. This is a problem. The higher the cost of the university, the more difficult it is for higher education. The more student loans there is, there is the possibility of delaying "growth" of "buying a house" or "making a family." There are many other reasons that we want to solve this problem as a society - at first glance seems to be a substantial problem - but in all articles, columns, television groups, political discussions you are satisfied Some explanation, why the cost of the university will rise at such unsustainable rate?

The difference between pragmatism and idealism is that ideologicalism or proposition depends on its validity and practicality, whereas idealism focuses primarily on the ideal or subject behind the proposition. However, the term idealism can have several different meanings, but in most interpretations, it is not a figure that should be, it is a thought, imagination or spirit of a pragmatic opinion that focuses on the existence itself It is a matter of concern. . Practicalists see the validity of the theory based on their results and results rather than their potential ideals and ancestors. In a practical view, the quest for the essence and existence of things is thought to have to start from the Latin "media resource" in the middle of "things". The start of the survey will depend on past decisions and preconceptions on the situation. According to pragmatism, philosophy is not preceded by scientific exams, but it is preceded by scientific exams. Philosophy should not be ruled from above, but should obviously be dominated by accepted criteria of current best practices. As a descriptive philosophical term, "pragmatism" first appeared in the late 19th century when William James used it at the address given by the University of California. John Dewey was a recent pragmatic supporter whose work had a major impact on American intellectual thinking during the majority of the 20th century. In this article, RMS (Richard Matthew Stallman) describes the need for idealism and pragmatism. In everyday understanding, word theory and idealism are often seen as opposite, but they are concepts of different directions. Practical means to perform effective or productive work. Idealism is to have an ideal goal that may seem very difficult or impossible. All four combinations are possible and can be a practical idealist or an impractical idealist. For example, Stallman's ideal goal is to respect all user software freedom to all software, its usefulness is copyleft. For the same ideal goal, an impractical approach can be used, in which case Stallman thinks it will be released under BSD or other licensed license. It is pragmatism. One of the great accomplishments of William James, John Dewey and his followers' pragmatism is the generality of abstract theories, formal definitions, ideal typologies and metaphysics. Ability to form skepticism about work attitudes. After that, he ridiculed as "transcendent meaningless" to accurately reflect the real world. Practicalism does not evaluate the real world based on an ideal theoretical model, but suggests a more bottom up approach, that is, a way in which ideas and institutions actually function in the real world. Practicalism recognizes anti - formalism, realism, pluralism, tool - like knowledge and methods of investigation. It measures the truth through research results - in fact the thought and institution's practical influence and consequences Practicalism is not the first way to apply evolution theory to knowledge theory. Schopenhauer advocates biological idealism because useful things for organisms can be very different from reality. Here, knowledge and behavior are depicted in two separate areas. There is an absolute or transcendental truth that transcends every questing life used to deal with life. Practicalism challenges this idealism by providing an "ecological" description of knowledge: inquiry is how a living thing holds its environment. Reality and truth are functional labels in exploration and can not be understood outside this context. Traditionally, the meaning of strong realism (Hilary Putnam is later called metaphysical realism) is not realism, but how to recognize the outside world to deal with is realism.

"The pleasant, witty and annoying history of Wolf's modern architecture is a high-level comedy, such as treating a lot of money, manners, popular preferences." - Publishers Weekly "No wonder, this book is the most popular topic in the Manhattan building salon." - New York Times book review "Tom Wolf squeezed an interesting story with glass and stones ... very funny." - Wall Street Journal Tom Wolf (1930 - 2018) is one of the founders of the news movement and is the author of contemporary classical writers such as Electric Cool Aid Test, Light Staff, Radical Thick, Maumaushing Flake Catcher. As a novel "Vagrant bonfire", "filled with people", "I am Charlotte Simmons". As a journalist he wrote an article in a magazine named "Washington Post", "New York Herald Tribune", "Mr. Fashion", "New York" and called it "The Me Decade". Among his many honors, Tom received the National Book Award, the John Dos Passo Award, the Washington Irvine Literary Excellence Award, the National Humanities Award, and the National Contribution Fund Award. He is from Richmond, Virginia and has a bachelor 's degree. He graduated from Washington and Lee University and got a doctorate. In American studies at Yale University. He lives in New York. Skepticism about modernism is not limited to the UK. In the United States, Tom Wolf wrote from Bauhaus to our house, from Bauhaus directly to the United States to explain the Prince of European silver, he wrote that he built houses that look like worker's house and pesticide factory. Reliable point He suggested that any attempt to actually sit on the Le Corbusier's reclining chair would adopt karate behind his neck. "In modernism attacks on inhumane behavior, and in the extreme case anything that can be filled with contemporary nicknames has concluded that modernism can not find beauty and that it is not worth it. I thought, "Wilk said. The mind still believes in the early moral mission of modernists. Therefore, the crime of a concrete tower where Le Corbusier's design is inadequate and construction is inadequate has little to do with his work. The wolf suddenly came to our house from Bauhaus and finished his question. But the answer is in its early stages, Wolff explained the first principle that Gropius and his colleagues built Bauhaus. They were so excited by the new industrial era and they named themselves as Prince. I think there are many designers close to many things today, but that is more than just the possibilities of new materials and manufacturing processes. Design enthusiasm, such as behavioral interventions, nudging in the "correct" direction of people, most people meaning "right" or supporting loyalty, is one example of the same impulses leading to machines is. To survive This is synonymous with a hero designer, bring new knowledge to customers, educate customers, and improve customer hobbies. Walter Gropius and other Bauhaus teachers and graduates play Moses' role and can acquire knowledge that has not been washed from the mountain even if it is not washed. I passed the director of the Yale museum. Designers have problems as a convincing taste maker. Mr. Wolf said how modernist luxury clients feel dissatisfied with the design of architects and how people working in modernist architecture impose restrictions on their "living machines" I often speak about what. For Gropius and Mies, Philip Johnson and others, if the customer is not satisfied, it is because they are caught by their bourgeois view, not because the building is bad.

After his successful Broadway theater "Time of Your Life" (pr., P. 1939) and his short story collection "My Name Is Aram" (1940), William Saroyan is a Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (MGM ). I hired a major movie in December 1941 (And he believed, directly). The script of the movie "Human Comedy" (1943) was completed in February 1942. However, shortly after the work was completed, Sarayan was dismissed from the movie project due to disagreement with the studio director Rui. B. Meyer, about direction. Then he began to turn his screenplay into a novel. It was published shortly before the movie was released and was published at the beginning of 1943. The history of the development of this novel explains in part the features of that episode: it consists of short chapters that can not make an obvious transition from scene to scene quickly. This style has changed a little, but it is used earlier in As I Lay Dying (1930), in Saroyan's work, also by William Faulkner's work. It worked very well. Human comedy underscores the familiarity, simplicity, and the kindness inherent in the working class, which apparently belongs to the pattern of literary attempts to return to traditional values ​​from the 1930s to the early 1940s . Like the Joad family of John Steinbeck's "The Grapes of Wrath" (1939), the Macauley family is prevalent in toughness through toughness, perseverance and deep-seated feeling. Thus, a fictitious family life event in Ithaca, California, based on the authors' own experience raised in Fresno, California at the beginning of the century, represents the greater America in the Great Depression and in World War II . Please experience. Even though the content of this novel occasionally became sentimental, Sarroyan's work still has advantages and freshness. In this article by Prospect, Julian Gough explicitly explained the comedy he traced back to the Greeks, and Russian linguist / theorist / philosopher MM Bakhtin called it a "carnival" . In this comedy tradition, the comedy's text (or performance) answers, "Our endless and repetitive painful cycle, fear of it, we can not escape it," human life It represents a completely invisible view of. Laughter stopped. Gough did not use that term in his articles, but Bakhtin further called this attitude about human relations "extreme skepticism". Authority is not escaped from the corrosive view of such laughter, and the acts and discourses presented with "frank seriousness" will not be taken seriously after all. Bergson and Meredith 's essays have both been criticized for limiting the scope of laughter to the power of their ridicule, focusing on comedy as a social correction force. This charge is more destructive to Meredith's article than Bergson's article. Regardless of the latter's limit, it is still exploring the meaning of its own thesis in a very thorough way. The result is a rigorous analysis of the causes and effects of cartoons, and no students appreciate this There is no doubt. Bergson 's comments on comedy have the greatest relationship, and they appear to be mostly built. Most of his examples are taken from the example of Morieres, Bergson's own dramatic element of contemporary contemporary Eugène-Marin Labiche. These suggest that Bergson 's comedy field has few highlights for this type of analysis. French philosopher Henri Bergson was theorized in the essay "The Comey". Bergson thinks cartoon characters are rigid or inflexible when they need the resilience of the soul. Or body. Furthermore, since the character repeatedly fails to change rigid behavior, repeatedly changes the hardness to a mechanical appearance like a jack box, so laughter increases.

The global economic crisis that began in the middle of 2007 continues to be an unsettling event in the future of the world economy. But today's politicians actually think that it is useful for many large companies around the world to ignore it. But in October 2011, the world saw one of the biggest chaos in the history of the economic crisis. From New York to Rome, the people expressed dissatisfaction with the government's policy promoted by the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression of 1930. In the global financial crisis, a new paper on journalism research focused on mainstream newspapers in the United States, the UK and Australia during the 2008 global financial crisis. According to the newspaper, the mainstream financial media "generally do not issue warnings, lack sufficient skepticism when reporting finance and economic trends, journalists are closer to sources of information used to obtain information Too much. " Poverty, a study by Media & Jornalismo published at the Media and Journalism Research Center at Coimbra University in Portugal, reports that Western news media frequently reports poverty performance such as famine, overcrowding and natural disasters, but "poverty is" emergency The problem, "the reporter says, Economic and financial crisis 2 World financial crisis Article on global financial crisis What is the reliable predictor of economic and financial crisis? Economists often can not predict the economic or financial crisis. Regardless of whether the economy is slow or fast, you can predict how the economy will evolve. Economists use key economic indicators that do not always accurately predict changes in the economy. There are three economic headline groups that allow investors to point out the economic direction. In order for economic indicators to have some value, we need to keep the information up-to-date in order to predict what will happen. The global financial market experienced a global economic crisis that began in the United States in 2008. Real economic production of the world is decreasing. The global financial system has undergone reform and the possibility of falling into crisis is low. Please describe the outcome and unresolved issues in the global crisis. The economy Introduction The debt crisis in Europe is the continuation of the global financial crisis, the result of Europe trying to solve the global financial crisis, ending prosperity for ten years and unlimited debt. European attempts to protect themselves in a severe depression are now causing new, unsustainable and unrepayable sovereign debt crisis. In the early 2010 crisis of the sovereign debt crisis, the 2010 Euro crisis was formed in several European countries, including Europe.

The development of the market economy began in the era before the industrial revolution and almost finished at the end of the industrial revolution. For American workers and slaves, in particular in Philadelphia the nature of labor changes dramatically. Prior to division of labor, society was mainly based on the work of craftsmen. Adam Smith and Alexis De Tocqueville have different views on how to influence the development of the US labor force. Smith celebrates division of labor, but Tokuwir is not so optimistic. Amazing waves of innovation and technology, including marketing and sales experts in B2B, are changing our economy and work. The core of this evolution is that sales teams and marketing teams are being adjusted more than ever. Let's jump into all three areas you should know for every salesperson and marketer to build a successful partnership. B2B marketers have come to connect with Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter customers on a personal one-to-one level. It is a bit familiar. B2C marketers keep in touch with customers and potential customers in this way and are now using this style to attract increasingly informed and self-sustaining buyers. However, experienced observers of the employment market exploitation tend to question the proposition that the employment in many economic zones has disappeared. Furthermore, if you erroneously estimate the number of jobs that may be automated in the coming decades, they are still skeptical. An important (unexpectedly underrepresented) study by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) now gives a concrete form of this skepticism. It duplicated the majority of the original (and should be said to be considered) reports by Karl Frey and Michael Osborne, which produced a "47% risk work" discovery - but it mitigated some important assumptions In many parts of the world, we are heading towards the cognitive and cultural economy. Evolution can not be stopped. The importance of shared services is increasing, and many people are forced to behave as independent contractors themselves due to the harsh employment market. Even in the United States alone, it is estimated that by 2020, 40% or even half of the labor force will become freelancers. When talking about collaboration and economic sharing, companies like Uber and Lyft are always mentioned. These are private enterprises funded by venture capital to maximize profitability. They are not service providers, service providers are independent contractors and are therefore vulnerable. They really promote economic development and people like to do so. But what about their suppliers? Almost all the smartest people I know are fascinated by the theory of evolution and have done thorough research. I think this is a powerful metaphor that can almost understand all aspects of human life. Relations continue to evolve, employment opportunities continue to develop, the company continues to develop, the market continues to develop, and people are constantly evolving. In this sense, understanding evolution is a deep practical pursuit of understanding the power to shape our lives. Frankel believes that we can not avoid suffering even in 'normal' lives. However, if we find meaning in it, we can persevere and proceed to new goals. In order to avoid this wasteful suggestion that sounds like "Follow your passion" Frankl takes a more subtle perspective and the way an individual finds it.

Christian faith in your responsibility at the beginning and end of life Christian believes that everyone is a precious day at the beginning and the end of life. Everyone is "built on the statue of God". Christian believes that each person's life is unique and unique, and no one has the right to take him away from this life. They also should have "value and dignity" as a person who believes that human life is sacred. The beginnings of Christianity are not based on an exclusive belief system. Christian faith is based on the reaction of God's love for sinners hateful to you and me. There is nothing narrow or elite because of the belief that "Like you". Charles Spurgeon is a strong teacher of Christians, "When considering that he was completely lost and destroyed, his whole body is polluted and filthy without contaminated parts, declares a sin, then says Jesus' Seeing the cleansedness through blood and the grace of God, seeing that sin died, I see the soul of the man suffering the benevolent eyes of the Lord. Christian faith in the afterlife depends on sects and individual Christians, but most Christians believe in paradise where believers enjoy the existence of God and other believers and are free from suffering. Freedom of sin. Most Christians obey the idea that Jesus died on the cross for human sins (immoral behavior). The Bible has mention of heaven and hell. Obviously those who believe without following Jesus will ultimately fall into hell and those who do so will receive salvation and will ultimately enter Heaven. Some people explain that there are times of birth and time to die in the Bible. Even though most, if not most, Christians have a view that they want them to be wrong. Hell is an eternal punishment. It is a solid belief of this sort and I hope that God will prove that it is ultimately not true. If we can put Christian on the spectrum, if it is a literal belief in hell, we will find that there are few people in one pole. Most Christians do not want to believe in literal hell, and some Christians can not simply believe in literal hell (aka, persuade universalists). The rest of Christian 'Orthodox' is a little rounded in the middle of eternity Stark did not try to deny the Christian faith everywhere, that is, God was working at the beginning of the Christian campaign. Instead, he wants to study this fast-growing approach. He believes that social science ends several generic and permanent myths about the rapid growth of Christianity. The meaning of this transition from one religious organization to another religious organization is that the middle class and the privileged class tend to convert from the lowest class. Stark must "always leave to them a new religion through traditional religious weakness in market openness", and "religious skepticism is the most common among more privileged people" It has said. Why is this happening? Stark believes that the person who best understands the new religion and who believes in the necessity of faith is the most economically privileged (39).

Lukoil has experienced many difficult times for the oil industry in today's world. What is important is that the crisis not only poses a risk but also brings new opportunities. Therefore, Lukoil seized the opportunity before catching others. Lukoil is developing strategically to deal with the crisis by setting realistic goals and comparing it with actual risk. Lukoil makes progress in a sustainable way and creates value to people while achieving company sustainability goals. The BRIC countries played an important role in restoring global governance in the global economic crisis. Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in India said at the BRIC Summit held in Brazil last year, "Implementing the Security Council by expanding the permanent and non-permanent seats and improving their working methods, important, reflecting the reality of the modern times" (Manmohan Singh, 2010). He also said that BRICs will play an important role in shaping sustainability, the leadership and pace of growth in the global economy. The global financial crisis affects not only rich countries but also emerging countries and developing countries. Countries such as Brazil, Russia, India, China (BRIC) and many other emerging countries achieved very high economic growth before the crisis but economic activity slowed down due to the global economic downturn. Following the impact of the global financial crisis on the world economy and the deteriorating financial condition of the bank, Mauritius investors began responding through September 2008 through the sale of a large number of shares. Naturally, the biggest price declines are the banking and financial sectors of the Mauritius Commercial Bank (MCB) and the National Mauritius Bank (SBM). As a result, SEMDEX in the stock market of the Mauritius Stock Exchange's official stock market began to fall to the lowest level. In the global financial crisis, a new paper on journalism research focused on mainstream newspapers in the United States, the UK and Australia during the 2008 global financial crisis. According to the newspaper, the mainstream financial media "generally do not issue warnings, lack sufficient skepticism when reporting finance and economic trends, journalists are closer to sources of information used to obtain information Too much. " Poverty, a study by Media & Jornalismo published at the Media and Journalism Research Center at Coimbra University in Portugal, reports that Western news media frequently reports poverty performance such as famine, overcrowding and natural disasters, but "poverty is" emergency The problem, "the reporter says,

Marconi (2010) believes that the role of institutional investors will expand the financial crisis. Institutional investors enjoy the advantage of reduced privilege of commissions, either individually or by business. This is due to their large professional investment. Institutional investors such as mutual funds, pension funds, Moneyar Capital, other life insurance companies such as AIG, and mutual funds contributed to the global financial crisis of 2007-2008. The economic and financial crisis of 2008 - 2009, also known as the global financial crisis, is considered the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression. The overall picture of the financial market has become more complicated by the introduction of new financial products and different operational modes including globalization. The global financial markets appear to play a variety of roles in the economy and have played a part in new regulations. The introduction of a new trading platform, online access to information, integration and market globalization brought about a review of several financial theories. What are the reliable predictors of the economic and financial crisis? Please describe the outcome and unresolved issues in the global crisis. Are we still in danger of economic and financial problems today? Question: The 2008-2009 economic and financial crisis, also known as the global financial crisis In the global financial crisis, a new paper on journalism research focused on mainstream newspapers in the United States, the UK and Australia during the 2008 global financial crisis. According to the newspaper, the mainstream financial media "generally do not issue warnings, lack sufficient skepticism when reporting finance and economic trends, journalists are closer to sources of information used to obtain information Too much. " Poverty, a study by Media & Jornalismo published at the Media and Journalism Research Center at Coimbra University in Portugal, reports that Western news media frequently reports poverty performance such as famine, overcrowding and natural disasters, but "poverty is" emergency The problem, "the reporter says, Charles Ferguson's 2008 Internal Working Documentary and exposure on the details of the financial crisis has nothing to do with the global climate crisis, but its impact on corruption, greed, and power is discussed in David Wallace's paper It resonates strongly with some of the themes. . It is a suspicious businessman of water, Naomi Oresquez and Eric Conway. At the same time, "This is water" is related to the reason why people can not motivate by the sympathy of the people around us and the health of the environment in our daily life. For example, Mr. Foster detailed the idea that university degrees can not prepare for the reality of life, and that the argument has not been discussed even though the "adult" American lifestyle is ubiquitous (3).

Young Goodman Brown - Difference of Explication Young Gudman Brown, known as one of Hawthorne 's best short stories, has meanings to students in several ways, as well as several possibilities. Possibility of ambiguity DM McKeithan's article 'Young Goodman Brown': Interpretation '(Modern Language Notes, 67 [1952], 93) recommends "Theme" as a story. The universality, the secret sin and hypocrisy of all men, the hypocrisy of Puritanism, the result of doubt and doubt, the devastating effect of moral skepticism. Nathaniel Hawthorne's young Goodman Brown's revelation Nathaniel Hawthorne's criticism and reflection on young Goodman Brown focuses on the theme of good and evil. Critics are talking about interpretation of the main character's consciousness, such as whether Brown is awaking or dreaming. It is true that the belief that he believes in justice separates him from the community. Hawthorn's interpretation of Brown's "middle-aged crisis" is ambiguous and certainly gives the reader many different opinions about the cause and cause of a particular matter. Hawthorne used symbolism in his allegorical story "Young Goodman Brown" "Young Goodman Brown" by Nathaniel Hawthorne describes a story about exposing true evil and losing faith. Nathaniel Hawthorne left "Young Goodman Brown" and received many explanations. It is obvious to me that what I absorbed from this story is that everyone thinks it is good, no matter how good we think. "The self-refusal and self-curse Brown" which is the hero of this story began metaphorical errands he planned to face his own evil. As he was not ready to accept this as part of the nature of others, he rejected it instead and eventually prescribed his own destiny. Nathaniel Hawthorne 's short story' Young Goodman Brown ', a symbol of' Young Goodman Brown ', shows the author' s power as a symbolist to the reader. Frederick C. Cruise explains the symbolic system common to Hawthorne's best short stories in "Roger Malvern's Funeral Execution Logic". . . - Scarlet Letter's symbolic writer sometimes expresses various things, characters, and ideas using symbols in novels. An example is the uniform of Son Superman, which symbolizes that he is eating dinner. In "Red Letter", Nathaniel Hawthorne has created a symbolic meaning of the letter "A" with different meanings. As the novel began to spread, the meaning of the letter "A" in Hester purine's embrace changed from adultery to angel. At the beginning of the novel, Hawthorne represented the letter "A" in Hester's arm as a symbol of adultery. When people in the town saw it, Hester would wear a letter "A", and she committed an affair.

Searching why women are between 1900 and 1914 can not gain voting rights Some women who do not have voting rights between 1900 and 1914, both long and short, There are reasons. Long-term reasons, including lots of people at the time that women and men have points of view "different spheres". They believe that women belong to the private sector - responsibility for raising children, cooking, men must be involved in the public domain, politics. Henry Labouchere said: because of these roles, "I will destroy the relationship between all trials to break down the natural barriers of men and women" believed to be set by God, Between 1900 and 1914, women found a reason why they could not get the right to vote during the period from 1900 to 1914, and there was a social revolution. In the patriarchal society of the UK, women live together, there is new movement, women seek voting rights. These "new" women face many obstacles, one of which is government skepticism. After November 1911, we began to create our own obstacles by initiating violent protests by WSPU (Women's Social Political Union) who did not have voting rights. This is because women of various reasons between 1900 and 1914 could not gain the right to vote for this article between 1900 and 1914 which could not get women's voting rights I will explore. It is seeing feminist, feminist NUWSS which is the main influence of patriarchal society. , Publicity and other influences. By 1900, women have made many advances in education, legal rights and employment opportunities. But they still can not vote in the general election. Many women believe they are always second-class citizens before they gain basic rights to choose their members. Searching why women are between 1900 and 1914 can not gain voting rights Some women who do not have voting rights between 1900 and 1914, both long and short, There are reasons. As a long-term reason, there are views that many people at the time thought that women and men had "independent areas". They believe that women belong to the private sector - responsibility for raising children, cooking, men must be involved in the public domain, politics. Henry Labouchere said: because of these roles, "I will destroy the relationship between all trials to break down the natural barriers of men and women" believed to be set by God,

Today, many people around the world misunderstand and judge others. This represents people. From mid-nineteenth to late, Emily Dickinson was judged not to know who you are. Her life is a mystery to most people. It is her secret that they know. She wrote at the end of the romantic era, but she was also known as a realist era writer as she focused on the negative aspects of life. Dickinson wrote 1770 poems and released only seven (Dommermuth-Costa 105) in her life. There are many biographical information about Dickinson, but there seems to be no important details. What is the relationship between Dickinson's life event and her poem? Most of her poetry is about love, death, and religion. Her biography has many explanations through her poetry, but they are by no means true. Critics also believe that when she was a childhood friend, Sophia Holland died in 1844, she was addicted to her childhood. As an adult, Dickinson endured mourning suffering for many relatives, friends and family throughout her life. Emily Dickinson's poem has at least one theme such as death, nature, religion, eternity, love. Dickinson's poetry has combinations of themes and unique poetry. Her poetry has strong meditation like oblique light ... I know that his existence is a poem with skepticism as a theme. I have no one! Who are you? The above father features an embarrassing poetic charm (Polac 30). Dickinson's style of poetry is unique and her early poems are as good as later verses (MacNeil 614), as all her poems do not have any form of linear expansion or linear punctuation. Dickinson's sentence style is characterized by the fact that there is no punctuality at the end of the line. Therefore, create a gift that forms a complete poetry. The power of nature is a theme that appears repeatedly in the poetry of Emily Dickinson and Robert Frost. Dickinson used this theme in her poetry "nature" - what we saw - Dickinson strongly depicted the power of nature because of the essence of this poem. "... Show more ... Both Dickinson and Frost are the matter of death and loneliness In emily's poetry," My life was closed before being closed twice - "In the case where immortality is revealed / The third time happened to me ", the speaker also mentioned about his death (278). These three events represent the death of the speaker himself. In the last two lines of the poem, "Farewell", we all know heaven. The speaker is talking about heaven to show the end of pain to the loved one. The explanation of hell is the pain and sorrow that people feel. Relatives are dying

Enlightenment, also known as the age of reason, was the era of the entire 18th century society, religion, and political revolution that changed human thoughts during this "waking up" period. This is the liberation of ignorant thoughts, thoughts and actions, and as these thoughts, thoughts and actions have been separated from ignorance of how to maintain and adhere to society, there is little room for new ideas about the world. The Puritan society has discovered that these new ideas are fundamentally radical compared to what they think are strong reasonable religious and moral beliefs. Enlightenment, transcendence, and theology of Puritan: Three phases of the 3 rd century have been formed in the United States. Each philosophical period overlaps with another philosophical period, so all three have similarities and differences. Due to the emergence of these philosophies, different writers have different views and formed American prose. One of the main enlighteners is Thomas Paine. Thomas Paine wrote an article called "The Age of Reason". In this article, he completely contains the ideology of enlightenment. Include these Roughly speaking, the American philosophy of the 18th century can be divided into two parts The first half is still influenced by Puritan's Calvinism The second half is more direct along the European Enlightenmentism, the founder It is related to political philosophy. (Eg, Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin, etc.). The most important thinker of American philosophy in the first half of the 18th century was Jonathan Edwards (1703-1758). Often related to a hot speech of preaching such as "sinners in the hands of angry gods" and "the great awakening of the religious resurrectors of the 1740s", Edwards is a member of Calvinist theology and emerging Newton science I refined and assimilated both. View of the world It can be said that Benjamin Franklin is the greatest example of American enlightenment. Franklin is a child of Boston's inconspicuous Puritan family, with little formal education, but has become a pioneer in publishing, science and diplomacy. Prior to the American Revolutionary War, it was an outstanding American in the "Republic" across the Atlantic Ocean. At first glance, Franklin's religion also seems to be consistent with the pattern of educational secularism. As in his teens, as he told us in his autobiography, Franklin accepted skepticism of Christianity and made him "a complete deity". But in his adult life, Franklin showed signs of long lasting influence on his parents' beliefs. He will never accept all the teachings of traditional Christian faith, but the framework of this belief, rhetoric, even even customs has had a strong influence on him.

Truth, knowledge, opinion What is truth, knowledge, opinion, and why is it extreme heavenlyness? What is truth, knowledge, opinion, and why extreme skepticism self-contradicts? The truth is only the soul which corresponds to the reality, knowledge means to have the truth, to know that you have it, to understand why that is the truth. Skeptics say that there is the truth "there is no truth". We use free choices, truths, knowledge, and opinions to form ideas through our choices and to gain recognition from empirical knowledge backed by the facts of opinion. Through many choices and choices developed in the brain for the course of action, forms of thought are formed through free will. For facts and reality, we have formed an idea that is thought to be true in the process of thinking. Our experience from observation, reporting and other aspects made it possible to shape the idea of ​​knowledge we gained. Opinions form a way to understand the way from our personal thought or facts about subjects, questions, situations or discussions. I am convinced that we can call assertions of any kind of knowledge, such as expressions such as truth, opinion, publicity, etc., as knowledge. Naturally, the truth is based on rational and logical thinking, the view is mere personal belief, propaganda is a belief used as an operation tool. essay.com/TOK paper: What standards would you use to distinguish between knowledge, opinion, and publicity? " Perception, knowledge and opinion are not composed simply of knowledge approach and knowledge domain. Depending on the percentage, they can contain different types. Knowledge, opinions, and publicity are complementary. They are using each other. However, they use each other in their own ways and create new perspectives, knowledge, and propaganda. The way in which they create "new" things is a mixture of perceptions, emotions, languages, reasons and other ways that can be included in four cognitive ways, but in part and in part and in this way. When they create "new things", "new things" or "changing things" you can enter different fields of knowledge. Here, it may not be absolute. My new knowledge is about opinion and perception, but it may still include mathematics, natural science and humanities. There are various authorities seeking knowledge at essay.com/. What standards would you use to distinguish between knowledge, opinion, and publicity? There are many different authorities seeking knowledge. What standards would you use to distinguish between knowledge, opinion, and publicity? This is what I want you to remember. Knowledge is a whim. The truth does not exist. This is all opinions. Those who have money seem to be more pleased than their majority to make them exceed their opinions ... say ... my. But in my mind, I know the truth and falsehood that will serve me and my life.

Until the First World War, "the description of the American war was mainly limited to the statement of the general ... the vast majority of the confusion and confusion of war was imaginary" (Smith 11). Prior to Stephen Clan's civil war novel "The Brave Red Badge", American writers rarely regarded war as a viable literary theme. Klein did not enter the war zone, but his publication was thought to be the first to exploit the possibilities of the battlefield as a literary background. Ernest Hemingway further developed war fiction types and added "news style" described by Smith to more contemporary skepticism of modern warfare. This book is trying to find the answer to the basic question (page 5). "What is the most basic human instinct - what can overcome self defense?" More basically (5 pages): "Why do civil war soldiers do this?" This book is about the fundamentals of fighting in battle Focuses on the question: Why do they fight when death is a very real possibility? What are the reasons they challenged this possibility and kept struggling? McPherson uses his own words based on his sentences (letters, memoirs, journals, diaries). The author reports to read 25,000 private letters and 249 diaries Over the years, James McPherson has been plagued by the motives of dead soldiers fighting during the Civil War. To find the answer, he turned to thousands of letters and diaries written by soldiers during the war. His research, reasons and comrades explain why soldiers fight for it, and how they deal with fear of battle and pressure. McPherson analyzed the three types of motives: early (why soldiers join), maintain (why they stay in the military), and battle (why they involve battle). In the Civil War, we found that the motivation for all three categories is very consistent. Elements such as training and leadership are important, but McPherson claims that the will to fight depends on personality. In the Civil War, the "real warriors" of the Federal Army and the Confederate Army were those who firmly believed in their careers and hugged their brothers. McPherson 's argument is that Civil War soldiers are kept motivated by ideology and continue to maintain societal beliefs in courage, responsibility, honor and believe in Bell I · Wiley (President of the Civil War Academy) who believes in them I refuse. It is not politically interested and does not move. On the contrary, Gerard Lindeman, whose work in the syndrome of Vietnam, who felt adventurous and companion's pressure, complained of the shock's shock, disintegrated them and crushed their ideals. He found some evidence to prove these positions, but most civil war soldiers are indeed a fundamental motive for the ideal of patriotism or ideology, and that of allies and Confederates of Confederates I am convinced that 66% and 68% will be affirmed. "Patriotic assertion" motives of battle "(100 - 01). The South Army also caused the American Revolutionary War, regarded as a struggle against independence and conquest.

Not only by the interesting use of that creative context and the wealth there is giving power. The various forms and purposes of writing are complex processes. We fuse together the right and left brains to shape our experience, and we feel that we can understand what others can read and understand. In order to feel this need, it is important to know that people's thoughts and emotions are important. Many people, especially children, think that the entire process is mysterious and inaccessible. The good news is that anyone can learn to write and each writer has his own unique process. But there are many ways to give power to us. The writing process is rarely linear, but there are various stages that all writers experience. Plan, contemplation, drafting, and revision - not necessarily in order! Writing can help children and adults: Questioning skills (collecting and evaluating information, comparing and comparing, imagining situations from different perspectives, establishing discussions on specific standpoints and perspectives, asking questions about importance as well as making other questions Learn) Have the intention to modify received information and questions) Developing sound skepticism, exploring ideas, expanding the world view, confidently expand the imagination. Why is writing so important? The importance of writing arises from the fact that writing is the main basis for communication, history, records, and the beginning of art. Writing is the framework of our communication. We write every day. It is very flexible to write which is an office note, restaurant menu, love letter; you can use it to provide information, opinions, questions or poetry. In sentences, words can take a rich form. The word you use may be that you are a person, what you are writing in our life, and the world is deep. I can not imagine life without writing. I have written for almost a year, but until now I have realized the influence and importance of writing. Last year, I had never been consistent, I wrote it when I wanted to. But this caused a lot of problems, and each time I sit and write, I do not have a clear theme to write. Even if I have a theme, it is actually difficult to collect my own ideas and write them down in a consistent way. But last month or so, I wrote, I can see the results. As long as I am sitting now, I can come up with a theme that is good enough to write. These topics usually come from my subconscious mind. In other words, I have been thinking about this topic. This makes me easier to gather my ideas and write them down in a coherent way. I write it because I can not write it. need to do it. I was consumed. I should do many other important things now, but writing is the most important thing in my life, and I've been using Medium for the past 15 months. Do not boast, but last year I wrote over 150,000 words equivalent to the two middle novels.

Shakespeare's courtship and attitude towards romance combine mature skepticism and recognize that social reality of courtship may impair romantic pleasure. The need to marry to gain social advantage and ensure heredity complicates romantic relationships. The drama is a comedy with multiple marriages and full of witty dialogue that has contributed to the moment of many comedies, but it also resolves more serious events, including several events related to tragedy did. William Shakespeare's play "Doing nothing" William Shakespeare explains how people can do a lot of things from anything. There are four main characters in this play, it has something to do with foolish things, it can make things very difficult. The main character is as follows. Benedick, Claudio, Beatrice, Hero. Shakespeare explains the role of these four different characters and how interpersonal relationships work. - Transformation of something of "anywhere" in Benedict's "do nothing" Shakespeare changed Benedict from singles to be in love with Beatrice. Shakespeare is doing very well, as it is so important, it will make this person 's change trustworthy. Shakespeare does this by gradually revealing the true relationship between the two using an important scene. At the early stage of Shake Spear's theater, there are many people who do not know that the difference between Beatrice and the main character "Theater of Shake Spear:" Nothing happens ". cousin. These two seem to be completely different at the beginning of the game, but as the situation develops and characters develop, there are some very obvious similarities between them. Heroes have a very intimate relationship with Beatrice; they are best friends. - Despite the strong domination of Queen Elizabeth in the middle of the 16th century, British women of the modern age had little social, economic and legal rights. According to the British chest system, married men and women become one under the law and hence "all the legal rights and responsibilities that a woman must assign to her husband when she gets married" (McBride-Stetson 189 ) Shakespeare does not draw relationships of various kinds of love, such as romantic love, family support, loyal friendship and so on. By exploring the influence of this strong emotion, Shakespeare emphasizes its universal significance. The main plot of many Ado About Nothing is the relationship between Claudio and Hero. - Many stories about love stories The first impression of Shake Spear 's "nothing bad" is that it will be a love story. It is classified as a comedy of Shakespeare, but I find that many of the "fun" parts of the drama are ambiguous and require reading the scene many times before understanding them. But nevertheless, I also have to read the whole scene many times to understand everything. All characters of Much Ado About Nothing seem to develop their own personality from the first scene.

Charles Earrings believes that "People can understand natural tools and things only by language, logic, practical signs." (Kremer) Descartes wants us to doubt. It is caused by irritation. "The function of thinking is to create beliefs after being stimulated by doubt." The influence of thinking, that is, beliefs, includes customs and faith is "behavior" because habits are "rules of behavior" . "Pearce's custom is using scientific methods instead of creating new methods like Descartes. Therefore, in the opinion of Peirce, Descartes did not "doubt" really believe what he believed, especially God. No doubt, some scholars object. For example, Huck wrote that the Descartes approach is different from the approach Pierce uses, does not require Pierce to assert that it is impossible and that person voluntarily begins people's first We begin to question our beliefs. "The pale of paper" goes back to "philosophical doubt" (as opposed to "heart suspicion"), and thinks that the former is not inappropriate in philosophy. In the sense of "pretend to be hesitant", Descartes doubts the existence of God, see Peirce vs. Descartes Mark. Criticism of Sim Descartes founder René Descartes ignored all beliefs, ideas, ideas, and materials. He showed that his reasoning and inference of knowledge may be wrong. Sensory experience as the main knowledge mode is often wrong and must be questioned. For example, what people see is probably an illusion. There is nothing to prove that it is impossible. In a nutshell, if there is a way to deny a belief, the reason is not enough. In this way, Descartes has proposed two arguments: a dream and a devil. Descartes' discussion is an epistemological argument. It casts doubt on the nature, limitations and validity of human knowledge. Descartes is not exploring the essence of reality, but doubts his own knowledge and interpretation of reality. Using methodological skepticism, Descartes doubts whatever may be suspected to lay the foundation for true knowledge. In epistemology, most of the knowledge we got is enough to explain the world, but there is no "absolute" truth. Descartes' goal is to build knowledge on a solid foundation - the scientific revolution is ongoing and Descartes thinks whether things have sufficient basis for pretending to be human beings things like this: If you believe that your precious others are loyal to you, well-known common friends promise you so you can later remind that your friend is a sickly liar I will discover. Alternatively, consider the standard meaning that the DNA laboratory does not need to maintain accurate results. All conclusions based on the results of this lab are questioned. Descartes will try to guarantee there is no such problem in the source of our knowledge. If there is any, it questions everything

The scientific revolution had a great impact on the enlightenment of the 17th and 18th centuries. The greatest contribution of the scientific revolution to the Enlightenment was to cast doubt on the concept of Christian doctrine through logic. This is beyond speculation that some people act personally among friends and may reach a level beyond the boundaries of any country. The Gutenberg's 15th century printing press made it possible for these great thinkers to spread their theory to those who did not have enormous wealth. God was born and prospered primarily in Europe and North America during the 17th and 18th century Enlightenment Period (please see the God of religious tolerance for details). Many American founder believe themselves as deity, or believe that elements of deity are part of their personal moral philosophy. Examples include Thomas Paine, Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin, George Washington and others. In addition to understanding our own moral lens, God also provides a useful window for historical ideas behind the establishment of our country. Okay, men and girls, ready to enlightenment In this lesson I will introduce enlightenment. what is that? Enlightenment, sometimes called the era of enlightenment, was an intellectual movement from the late 17th century to the early 18th century, emphasizing reasons, individualism, and skepticism. Enlightenment challenged the traditional religious view. Because that was such a wide movement, enlightenment did not have an accurate start date. It did not pop up, but it gradually developed. Most historians came to the beginning of enlightenment from the mid 17th century to the beginning of the 18th century. The work of intellectuals like Rene Descartes, Barus Spinoza, Isaac Newton is particularly important for the creation of enlightenment. Many critical thinkers believed that religion and reason are hostile in the age of enlightenment in the 17th and 18th centuries. For them, the Middle Ages or the "era of faith" is therefore the opposite of the era of reason. Kant and Voltaire were attacking the Middle Ages as an era of religious decline, and Jimbo in the "History of the decline and decline of the Roman Empire" expressed their contempt for "garbage in the dark ages". But like Petrarch, he saw himself at the cutting edge of the "new era" and criticized it for centuries before his own time, as was the enlightenment writer .

Due to the collapse of 2008, international trade and foreign direct investment sharply declined. In order to successfully negotiate the uncertain road facing many companies, administrators must change strategic approaches in various ways. It may be necessary to shift strategies to emphasize adapting to the local situation from the integration of each country. According to a recent survey of HBR readers, prior to the crisis, 88% of managers thought that a global strategy is indispensable, not a series of choices that need to be carefully evaluated. The financial crisis in 2008 revealed that there is a big gap in economists' understanding of financial intermediation. Mainstream economists have a very simple and stylized bank model that ignores the enormous number of financial products and strategies that have evolved over the past 50 years. They argue that they can answer questions about financial regulation, such as how to set bank capital requirements without clearly understanding how financial intermediaries create value. In the global financial crisis, a new paper on journalism research focused on mainstream newspapers in the United States, the UK and Australia during the 2008 global financial crisis. According to the newspaper, the mainstream financial media "generally do not issue warnings, lack sufficient skepticism when reporting finance and economic trends, journalists are closer to sources of information used to obtain information Too much. " Poverty, a study by Media & Jornalismo published at the Media and Journalism Research Center at Coimbra University in Portugal, reports that Western news media frequently reports poverty performance such as famine, overcrowding and natural disasters, but "poverty is" emergency The problem, "the reporter says, Charles Ferguson's 2008 Internal Working Documentary and exposure on the details of the financial crisis has nothing to do with the global climate crisis, but its impact on corruption, greed, and power is discussed in David Wallace's paper It resonates strongly with some of the themes. . It is a suspicious businessman of water, Naomi Oresquez and Eric Conway. At the same time, "This is water" is related to the reason why people can not motivate by the sympathy of the people around us and the health of the environment in our daily life. For example, Mr. Foster detailed the idea that university degrees can not prepare for the reality of life, and that the argument has not been discussed even though the "adult" American lifestyle is ubiquitous (3).

In his essay "Evil and Almighty", McGee has built a view on the possibility of the existence of God with the characteristics of Lord religion, namely Christianity, Islam and Judaism. These features include that God is omnipotent, that you can stop evil with omnipotent tenderness, want to destroy evil, or be completely kind. Mackie systematically completed his logical response to the logical thinking process and to all possible types of criticism and alternative solutions. Summary: As you all know, J. L. Mackie is famous for having no objective value. I would like to investigate Mackie's explanation of what objective value really is, then consider his argument against those subjects and try to understand one of them. Specifically, I would like to see if his argument applies to Kant's objective value. Therefore, this conversation is both Kant's explanation and McKee's explanation (at least when I understood them). McKee believes that objective value (if any) has a strange causal relationship. Specifically, these entities have the ability to make them conscious of their motivation (whatever their meaning, they follow their recommendations). Does Kant believe that objectively valuable entities have such power? Is this power strange in metaphysics? J. L. Mackie defends moral skepticism in three specific arguments. His initial argument came from cultural relativism. McGee saw the problem that what we call objective moral belief seems not to form our culture. Rather, our culture seems to form our specific moral beliefs like monogamous. Therefore, moral subjectivity is the most rational explanation of moral beliefs to imitate our culture. His second argument against moral realism is that there is something strange or counterintuitive in the description of objective moral fields someone might give. There are three differences in this discussion. First, there are metaphysical questions, or questions based on odd states claimed by realists. For McGee, the wonder of this field is arguments against it. Secondly, there is a relationship problem as it is not clear how this field relates to natural objects and human behavior.

I explain that Hume's argument seems to have reasons to explain why miracles are impossible. I agree with Hume's argument, I think it is correct; but I dispute some of his views. The central point that Hume tried to propose was that someone's testimony was unable to create a miracle. David Hume's "miracle" in David Hume's paper? miracle,? Hume has advocated various arguments about why people should not trust any miracle. Hume does not believe that miracles do not exist, but do not believe it because there is no reasonable background. One of his arguments, by definition, miracle is incredible. And there is no reasonable way to believe in miracles. Another argument is that most miracles often come from non-civilized interpretation or define miracles; miracles are violations of natural laws that are unusual for most people. When Hume said: "Nothing is considered a miracle, if it happened in a common process of nature, then he will explain this very clearly. A man that looks healthy will suddenly die It is not a miracle. "Hume, p. 888) Hume said that this death is abnormal, but it seems to happen naturally. Miraculous memory David Hume's "fairness about human understanding" is obvious, and he believes that no miracles will occur. Hume is a logical person who believes in knowledge experience. Of course, such people do not witness them, it is difficult to believe in extraordinary ideas. Especially when these events require a lot of faith. In order for the incident to be regarded as a miracle, it must violate the laws of nature. But, that is the same legal chief. David Hume devoted himself to part of his philosophy and tried to ignore his wrong assertion about the soul. In Hume's doubt, the German idealist began with Emmanuel Kant and left various cognitive and metaphysical problems. David Hume is an Scottish empiricist and became a philosopher for his metaphysical skepticism and explanation of his mind. Hume was born in the 18th century

Required Uprising Erich Fromm is a psychoanalyst and sociologist who has written many books and magazines for many years. He conducted close scrutiny on other psychologists like Fromm and Marx and published many other theoretical analyzes. Fromm explained in his essay "Disobedient as a psychological and moral problem" that he never obeys as a human and never turns it into frightening things. And I acted as though we won. "(621). "Human disobedience continues to grow.Human history can not start with disobedient behavior and can not end with obedience" In order to see not only war, riots, execution, but also poverty, pain, shame When my eyes are closed, we will be killed. With a little humorous skepticism, we can kill a lot of future in young men. - German poet, novelist, Hermann Hesse Why do humans tend to obey and do not want to resist. In Eric Flam's essay "Disobedient to Psychological and Moral Issues", obedience is considered virtue and disobedience for the majority of human history. When you believe that obedience brings happiness and success, they are no longer afraid as they hope to serve and disbelieve. Fromm wrote: I felt strongly because my obedience made me part of my worshiping power. Even if you commit a crime you can not be punished and you can not commit a crime (363) Throughout history, sociologists have analyzed the characteristics of human behavior. They all write papers and state their educational opinions about the situation they have. In 1963 Erich Fromm announced the first paper "Prohibition of Submission as Psychological / Moral Issues". It is also published in the textbook "Writing and Reading Courses". He wrote this article. And I wanted to educate the public about disobedience. From, I believe that disobedience leads to the advancement of human civilization. He first mentioned his article "Human history starts with disobedient behavior, which can not be terminated by compliance" (377). Fromm uses various rhetorical strategies to develop his ideas

Language philosophers initially thought that the language makes him better understand things, not just specifying things. But this is based on the exact concept of things, it is not accurate and the identity is only conceptual. The myth of language is to find the accuracy of things and pattern formation in our world. Since we feel that we need to communicate, language and consciousness develop simultaneously. But why the incredible language, why Frege think it is? These two issues indispensable to understanding the rise of language philosophy participation, especially Frege participation in language philosophy. If we find out that it is a convincing reason for explaining the need of thinking, in a language for philosophical exploration, then you can not find the Frugge struggle above, it is They do not seem necessary, so they are important, bypassing language barriers and direct access to our concepts and ideas. Historically, in particular, dealing with the second question, or there is a liability, we are Fregee at an early stage short of understanding of the concept of the relationship between language and thought and language. Summary of Skepticism and Philosophy of Language in Early Modern Thought: This paper discusses the importance of skeptical discussion of language philosophy in early modern thought. It compares the concept of language and knowledge of rationalists with the concept of philosophers taking a skeptical position. - Summer internship in the US Senator Connie Mack Senate, recent volunteer activities at the local education committee's event, and my previous volunteer activity for the Governor's campaign are my personal interests and long-term It represented a target. My future ambitions and goals show my interest and appeal to topics such as law and politics. Many people think these topics are boring, but I am fascinated by how these themes affect our society.

Reliability of the witness testimony of the child I think about the situation when I was the first criminal to the juvenile juvenile offender. When I heard that the lawyer depended on these children, I looked at the list and saw the familiar name. This name is the one that I went to kindergarten. She was sentenced to shoplift. can not believe. That thought of that soft and kind person disappeared. My behavior changes with the influence of the environment. Eyewitness testimony as a source of reliable evidence Witness testimonies are reliable in today's judicial system in cognitive psychology? Word Count: 3944 Summary Is the eyewitness testimony a reliable source of evidence in today's justice system? Assuming that they heard exactly the same thing that happened, many juries tend to pay close attention to the witness's testimony. They ignore psychology behind recalling events. Our brain is a complicated structure that is hard to absorb ... Although the evidence of witnesses is very important in solving crime, more and more cases are now being confirmed by DNA evidence. How confident is confidence based only on the evidence of the witness? A variety of factors are related to the accuracy and consistency of the evidence of the eyewitness testimony, such as the content of queuing, the instruction of queuing, the skill of the interviewer's question, especially the sex and age of the witness. Witnesses and testimony play a major role in today's criminal justice system, but skepticism of witnesses is rising. Forensic evidence is used to compromise the credibility of witness testimony and the main cause of false beliefs in the United States is witness mistakes. The role of eyewitness testimonies when generating false confessions and factors that reduced the reliability of these witnesses' testimonies have been sent

In "Exploration of Human Understanding", David Hume first contrasts two aspects of human reasoning, two aspects of moral philosophy, or human science (Hume 1). On the one hand it focuses on shaping human behavior and on the other it focuses on rationality. The first one is simple and obvious, the others are difficult and accurate. Hume shows that a simple and obvious philosophy appears more in mediocre life; it allows humans to become more benign and encourages emotions. Hume is an experientist and skeptical. His philosophy of development is usually approached by scientists, so he believes that he can make laws for human understanding. Hume studied understanding as an experientialist and tried to understand the origin of human thought. Empiricism is the concept that all knowledge comes from experience. Skepticism is to investigate things to find things that lead to personal reasons or those that feel particular emotions without knowing what is in nature in advance. Objectively speaking, there is a delicate boundary between reasoning and people's feelings, but philosophers Immanuel Kant and David Hume seem to have a big difference in views on this issue. Both are philosophers who change their lives, and they have different views. One sees the emotions of humanity, while the other seems to be seeing rationality. Understanding philosophical anthropology One way to find ways to understand the essence of humanity by considering different methodological approaches is to think of two questions: "What is a human?" And "Who am I "Various answers are given, but the most famous philosophical definition is still a classic definition proposed by Aristotle. The essence of man is "animal of reason".

Brazilian article by Michel de Montaigne "Cannibals" Michel de Montaigne said that when he explained about the Brazilians in the 1580 article "Of Cannibals". People, they must be so perfect, or since we must be so, there is an amazing distance between their personality and our character "(158). However, Montagne does not always maintain this "surprising" distance between barbarians and non-wild people, or between Brazilians and Europeans. Barbarians, and non - barbarians who best embodies the traditional European values, and finally the barbarians opposite the Europeans. Michelle Echem de Montagne, commonly known as Michel de Montagne, was born on February 28, 1533 in Montagne Castle (near Bordeaux, France). Montagne 's wealthy father, Pierre Ekemed Montagne decided to cultivate his son' s intellectual development with Latin as the first language. Montagne did not learn French until 6 years old. His father's death also meant that Montagne inherited family estate. In 1571, Montagne retreated to his castle and protected himself from public daily life. He also began writing personal and subjective thinking about topics such as religion, education, friendship, love, and freedom. Montagne called his original work Essa. He developed a new literary genre: articles Michel de Montaigne's article "Cannibals", Michel de Montaigne said: "According to our criteria, this is truly barbarian, as they describe the Brazilians in the article" Cannibals "in the 1580 article I have to do this completely or we have to do so There is a remarkable distance between their roles and our character "(158). - Descartes' free will to think the first philosophy In my first philosophical thinking, Descartes led the reader to practice methodology in philosophical exploration. After robbing all the wisdom of doubt and false beliefs, he reexamined the nature and structure of existence and tried to universally obtain a valid epistemology without skepticism.

Pornography can be defined as a sexually-exposed material that is mainly used for sexual arousal. Especially in the field of violence against women and social morality, it was always a major concern (Slade). The advent of the Internet has led to an increase in the use of pornography by individuals of all ages, mainly young people. Pornography is more visual than ever in human history, making accessibility easier. Some people view pornography from time to time without causing obvious side effects, but many people, including teenagers and teenagers, know that plastic brains are high and force high-speed internet porn. . In the first Internet pornographic user's brain research at the Max Planck Institute for Human Development in Berlin, researchers found that erotic use time and age are related to reduction of gray matter associated with remuneration in the brain discovered. Decrease sensitivity and sensitivity of pornography Neuroscientist Nicole Prause, a researcher at Liberos LLC has been studying the effects of pornography on the brain for years, but she is very skeptical about the model of pornographic dependence. Her skepticism continues the concept of erectile dysfunction due to erection, claiming that it is not supported by legal medical evidence. (The position of her voice critic as a model of pornographic poisoning urged Deem and Wilson to publish a blog post interpreting her findings, according to Prause they denied it by Deem and Wilson But)

So, what you said about Andy, or "gold" was born in the novel (Hello, poetry!), Led a series of questions about love. Sarah Kay often talks about writing poetry as a question making process - doing something on the page, or finding answers or more questions within the process. When you ask David Orr of poetry critic, he may tell you that the poetry and music are in two different art forms, and as you begin to assign "poet" to the music poet, these The category of is too ambiguous. His reaction to the Bob Dylan Nobel Prize for Literature almost summarized his skepticism about the blurring of music and poetry boundaries. Literature and composition Langston Hughes and Bob Dylan Langston Hughes and Bob Dylan are two contemporary American poet poets from different eras. Bob Dylan is like a composer, but I consider most of his work as poetry. In this article I will explain the Hughes poem "Harlem" and Dylan's "A-Changin era" as a cultural explanation, but the background is different. Both poets use social protest actions to express their views. - The poems of Langston Hughes 's "I, Too" and Karen' s "Event" use different forms of visual images, tones, exaggerations, symbols and prophecies to explain the commonalities between the two different races It is. The interaction of life can not fight their prejudice like the private life of African-American civil war.

Imagine a polar bear floating on the iceberg in the middle of the Pacific Ocean. What if they are lacking in the seriousness of water and life on the earth can not continue like this? If that is by human beings, most people will do. According to some people they say people are the cause of this horror scene, but others say the earth is in the natural cycle of warming, enabling these tragic events. Most scientists believe that global warming is occurring, but they are not sure if people are crazy or naturally occurring. The mainstream media widely believes that global warming is an "artificial" phenomenon. Many unconscious people think that carbon dioxide or carbon dioxide is one of the main factors of global warming, but that is not the case. Global warming is actually a natural change in the temperature of the earth due to solar activity. Regarding the cause of climate change, the scientific evidence of natural phenomena on the earth tends to be overlooked. - Anthropogenic climate change and the urgency of global warming "Rise in temperature and water temperature, increase in the number of days of frost, increase in frequency and intensity of storms, sea level rise, decrease in snowfall" Unless we take immediate actions for all human future ("Global climate change" 9, "Background") Climate scientists have reached a consensus that artificial global warming is an ongoing phenomenon, but political and public debate still exists, and this consensus is right or wrong Are you there. This discussion has recently been intensifying recently as skepticism about global warming has gradually changed the public's scientific understanding of global warming. Many people in the world question whether the reality of global warming exists and, if it exists, what is the reason for it to exist. But the fact is that in the past century the surface temperature of the earth has risen from 0.45 to 0.6 and believers of global warming believe that its warming is evidence of the presence of tits, but the skeptics are warming I believe it is just a natural phenomenon. There is no need to worry at all In recent years, the theme of global warming which is controversial has attracted more attention. Is the threat of global warming a reality? Whether it is man-made or whether it is the natural circulation of the earth. Does it really affect residents of the Earth? You should act against it. If so, it is what kind and range. The surprisingly rapid climate change occurs simultaneously with the increase in the amount of pollutants released to the environment by humans, but this is not just a coincidence. - "1 gallon petrol = 24 lbs of global warming gas emissions" (UCSUSA). Many of us in the world today do not understand the impact of cars on us, our lives, and the world we live in. There is no doubt that the invention of the car has changed our perception of the various technologies created in the past few years. . However, automobiles are one of the main factors in one of the biggest problems in today's world. This question is the name of global warming

Hume's ultimate goal in his philosophical effort is to weaken the esoteric philosophy. By focusing on a rational aspect, Hume shows that philosophy has limitations. As he does not know the limit he suggests that he use as many reasons as he can, but when he comes to the border this is the limit. He doubts that we have to research reason and find something beyond reasonable capacity. Hume started his first exam by classifying its contents as perception. The ethics of Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) are in stark contrast to the ethics of David Hume (1711-1776). Hume's moral philosophical approach is experimental and empirical; Kant emphasizes the need to establish a moral foundation in transcendentalism. Hume said that the reason is just "slave of passion", while Kant establishes morality with the concept of his own concept. Hume considers the feelings of kindness and generosity as a correct moral motive and Kant saw the motive of responsibility - Hume usually regards it as the motive of second best or recession, thus giving a devotion to morality that gives special morality Uniquely represent. Value is conveyed to action. Although the moral views of Kant and Hume are hostile to each other in many ways, there is also an important relationship between them. After the break, the philosopher Emmanuel Conde started reforming metaphysics. Kant believes that metaphysics is impossible if Hume is right. However, Kant did not want to give way to Hume 's skepticism, so Kant began to criticize the possibility to explore and reform metaphysics. Kant began to criticize the quest for 'transcendental' knowledge in philosophy. Kant began looking for the "transcendental" principle that can reasonably be inferred to explain why he thinks it can not be detected. Kant believes that the only way we can get the necessary and universal thing is through 'a priori'. Kant found that the notion of causality is not the only concept to understand things 'a priori' but the metaphysics confirmed to consist completely of these concepts. (8) Kant argues that Hume 's view is that mathematical propositions are analyzed? It is totally different. ~ 1 1 If Hume uses Kant's term when discussing Hume, it means that the knowledge of mathematics is a priori! Indeed, as we learned from paragraph 2, this term is not strange for Hume; for CeUsal, Hume says. Regardless of any exception, knowledge of this relationship can not be obtained by a priori reasoning under any circumstances, but when it is found that specific objectives are often combined with each other, is. Make sure that things are presented to those with strong natural rationality and ability; if things are new to him, he will cause some cause or influence by the most accurate test of his reasonable quality You will not be able to find it either. (E 2 7) It is mathematics to rest here

As Kef said, in the hot and troubling summer afternoon of 2000, about 35 million Brazilians saw the live broadcast, this was the "most fierce real TV" bus 174 hijacking. Since then, thousands of cameras have targeted the same person, there were 35 million individual stories. Cause, motivation, result, hijackers, hostages, police interpret different things. Also. The reality is related to the observer. Mr. Padilha, director of Brazilian "Elite Squad" movie "RoboCop", rebuilt the excitement and rigor of the old television broadcast festival with the political slimness against terrorism in the 1970s. Recent movie nuances Many people are participating, such as "Munich", "Carlos", "Vader Main Hof Complex", and "7 days at Entebbe" from various countries and perspectives, but increased did not. There are too many kinds. The story continues every day from hijacking to rescue. A parallel story develops, each story shows one of them tension and division. In the plane and in the terminal - and in some flashbacks - some extremists expressed their skepticism and debate strategy and ideology This movie dates back to the birth of the media in the second half of the 19th century, has a long tradition in Brazil, has gained international recognition in recent years. The documentary "Bus 174" (2002), written by José Padilha for bus takeovers, is the highest rated foreign movie by Rotten Tomatoes. Director Anselmo Duarte 's O Pagador de Promessas (1962) has won Parmedoll at the 1962 Cannes Film Festival, which is the only Brazilian film so far. Fernando Meirelles's "God City" (2002) is the most highly-rated Brazilian film in the IMDb 250 list and was chosen as one of the 100 best films made in 2005 by Time magazine It was. Dona Flor and her two husbands (1976), the best-selling movie in Brazilian films, were overseen by Bruno Barreto and basead, produced a novel of the same name by Jorge Amado, watching 12 million people Brought the person to the movie. Brazilian director Jose Padilha named after the action picture including the Elite Squad series. And the slow lineup of the movie is really its highlight. However, in the play of Gregory Bark, Padilla was using the story structure before and after, so the film felt dissatisfied that he could not get the potential momentum. "Entebbe 7 Days" was actually held by the performance of "Echad Mi Yodea" by Ohad Naharin in a semi-circular chair of Batsheva Dance Troupe. Rhythm Padilha will return to it over and over again, including permanent concurrent editing during Climax Rescue - it will never work. Even if he says that people are rising in the face of oppression and assertiveness, this is not clear.

I think education is very important now. Skepticism may be beneficial or defensive by the subject, but it also has to admit the lack of consensus terminology. Economics is an important part of the economy, and as money is money many people use this term to determine the value of the economy. Intellectual ability and test scores are also used to determine the level of educated people based on high score talent and talent. Smart represents a person who makes the right choice and takes the right action for a specific purpose. This is the attitude people can take, the position they can achieve. People can become smarter or smarter by applying information obtained so far or through personal experience. The meaning of a word includes some practicality and the concept of wisdom generally accepted: Everyone appreciates a wise person and makes a good decision. Therefore, as one of the things people can notice about individuals, it is a very subjective and unmeasurable function. Attitude is important. It can shape how individuals see experience and how viewers look at individuals. Attitudes can fully achieve or destroy experience. This is true also in clinical experience as it is in life. My clinical grade experience in the upper grade is undoubtedly unique, but I think that it is unique that everything I do and what all nursing students can do for themselves. If you learn lessons from reading my experiences, clinical success should depend entirely on student success whether it is guidance or group experience. Philosophical attitude is a concept that can be generalized and defined, but as an attitude, it must also be personalized to those who adopt a philosophical attitude towards themselves. In seeking our overall class input to the meaning of individuals and the philosophical attitudes of personal definition, the following definition of cooperation was created. Created clarity and new ideas. To take a philosophical attitude, you must first question the things they know about their world. When asking questions or ideas already present in our minds, we can unlock the unknown aspect of existing knowledge. In the process of further understanding, we will more carefully recognize the way the surrounding world and all its contents exist and interact.

David Hume has expressed strong support in the fourth section of the "human understanding survey". Hume said: "As a universal proposition I will take freedom to declare that I do not accept any exceptions, knowledge of this relationship is not obtained by a priori reasoning under any circumstances When discussing 'knowledge of this relationship', Hume refers to causality. Since all such knowledge is suspicious, this sentence can easily be regarded as being skeptical. David Hume Hume, David, 1711-76, Scottish philosopher, and historian. Hume brings empiricalism of John Rock and George Berkeley to the logical extremes of fundamental skepticism. He denied the possibility of certain kinds of knowledge and found a series of emotions in his mind and believed that the causal relationship in nature was entirely from B's introduction. The answer to the theme is drawn by the time committee named as illusion by David Hume, and the time committee named human by himself. In the era of modern philosophy, when the influence of Descartes was still important, David Hume brought the argument of killing the Descartes I created and skipping it like a ghost in human perception. You can see not only the theme but also the contrast between Hume and Descartes. Suicide analysis of David Hume "I do not think anyone will abandon their lives, but it is worth continuing." In a paper by David Hume "suicide" he pursued a philosophical argument about reasonable suicide. However, the underlying argument focuses on inappropriate evidence of the government and society, which condemns and prohibits such behavior, the creation of religion, and superstition and lies of God. Hume thinks that it is the final stage of the person's experience before observing observation. David Hume's induction problem. According to Hume, this reasoning method is logically effective. Logically reasonable reasoning indicates that if the premise is true, the conclusion must be true. Better still, if you accept this premise, you must accept that conclusion. There is no way to realize this place, and the conclusion is wrong. However, this is not the case as the use of a priori reasoning does not prove logically correct inductive reasoning.

Eyewitness testimony has always been regarded as important evidence in litigation. Even though the witness account is incompatible with other evidence, ordinary people believe that the identity of the witness is greater than any other evidence. Studies have shown that eyewitness testimonies are unreliable, but they are still considered to be the most important form of evidence. People think that it will happen if they say that they saw something. There is currently no general guide on how to obtain and provide such evidence. The purpose of this article is to explain why eyewitnesses' testimonies are unreliable, to discuss how law enforcement agencies collect identities and the proposed guidelines. From the 1960s to the 1970s, the Supreme Court began to recognize the problem of testimony of witnesses and began to take limited safeguards. Several safeguards proposed by the Supreme Court will allow the defendant to have a lawyer participate in the lineup, that the suspects object to identity cards generated by suspected police processes, improve handling of witness testimony Despite efforts by the courts and law enforcement agencies, misunderstanding is still the main cause of unfair convictions. The Innocence project is a domestic litigation and public policy institution aimed at eliminating false conviction through DNA testing. Since its inception in 1992, as of the date of this article, they have helped overturn 311 false beliefs in the United States. In 311 cases, we determined that false positives would bring about 73% of false beliefs ("innocence planning"). This is a very high percentage and what you need to do. In one example, the innocence project helped to appease Antonio Beaver, who was mistakenly convicted of crime based on wrong witness testimony. August 12, 1996, 1 Witnesses and testimony played a major part in today's criminal justice system, but the witness's skepticism is growing. Legal evidence is used to impair the witness's testimony's credibility The main cause of false convictions in the United States is the witness's misunderstanding. The role of eyewitness testimony in generating false confessions and factors that reduced the reliability of these witnesses' testimonies have been sent Legitimacy of witness testimony Witness testimony One of the most powerful evidences in today's court system or one of the most accepted facts of the jury is the witness's testimony. If it is correct, eyewitness testimony can help the belief of many sinful people. However, if it is not correct, the witness's testimony may cause serious damage. Researchers said, "Based on the witness's evidence in the UK, we recognized that more innocent civilians were mistakenly tried and convicted. Witness testimony can play an important role in criminal cases. Whether a person is convicted is due to the witness's reliability and how he or she confidently conveys testimony to the jury with confidence. The problem is that the opinions of these witnesses are not necessarily accurate. The Innocence project is a not-for-profit team of lawyers and legal students who are reviewing alleged murder charges and hoping to overturn false accusers' verdicts using DNA evidence. In the first 130 cases, innocence was rejected and witness testimony was involved in 78% of false convictions.

As his theory of interpersonal relationship builds the foundation of a moral system, I think Buber's position is more insightful. I will study the concept of subjectivity for the first time during Sartre. Next, consider Buber's viewpoint and compare it with Sartre's viewpoint. First, we compare how other people are changing the theme of the world. My second comparison explains the observation of the subject of the universe through the other about the relationship between Sartre and Buber's theme. 6 Jean Jean Sarte believes that humans can not obtain reasonable grounds for their lives, so life is a kind of "useless passion". . It is important to pay attention to this - Gardner said he said that he did not like Sartre. That's why Glendell is an example of what you do and what you should not do. 7. I do not believe in every sense of values, I believe there is nothing truly known or spread. The relationship between blasphemy and extreme pessimism is related to skepticism and accuses existence. true true nihilist ▪ 1) do not believe, ▪ 2) do not have loyalty,  3) no other purpose, probably destroying things and the surrounding people John Gardner's Grande. Grendel came from Beowulf. John Gardner changed the unilateral "evil" monster into a three-dimensional character. Hello, I saw it. Jean Paul Sarte is one of the pioneer philosophers who introduced this theory. He is one of the best surviving philosophers and writer of novels and autobiographies for celebrities. His childhood and early experience gave him experience to reach the point of discovering the importance of existentialism. One of his arguments is that if a person chooses to take some action, that person is convinced that the action is good. He believes that we consciously choose the way we act and all the reactions we experience in our daily lives. Since we choose to take action we accept the result and we believe it is a good thing for us. Therefore, good is a relative one, and answers to questions and doubts about the legality of this concept. In all the actions that we do, he chooses the action that we think is most suitable for him and claims that he is best suited for all actions. 2 Martin Buber * 3 Maxine Greene * 7 Criticism theory * 1 Paulo Freire * 8 Postmodern * 1 Martin Heidegger * 2 Hans-Georg Gadamer * 3 Jean-Francois Lyotard * 4 Michel Foucault * 2 Normative Educational Concept * 1 Perennial * 1 Alan Bloom * 2 Progressive * 1 Jean Piaget * 2 Jerome Brunner * 3 Essentialism * 1 William Chandler Bagley * 4 Social Reconstruction and Critique Education * 1 George Count * 2 Maria Montessori * 5 Waldorf * 1 Rudolf Steiner *

My father got off work for the next four days, and we were in a very impressive outdoor pool park. Even if he was very protective, when I was a child, I like to go to the pool with my father. I live with most of my father's family, including my cousin of my age. My cousin Patrick is over a year and a half year than me, in most cases most of my father's work. My father and his parents are very close, but naturally we went to many places together. As Veena Das stated, "I want to think about integration into the possibilities of daily life, not madness related to everyday life, full integration into daily life like daily life" (Das 2016 : 2). For my parents they can only see madness and irrationality as a complete and comprehensive nation and can not coexist with other reality. Emily Martin describes the concept of multiplicity in bipolar exploration; individuals can "reflect many ways of coexistence" (Martin 2007: 71). Through conscious efforts to "carve and introduce ourselves" (Martin 2007: 66), people can act in the same way as school (eg) or at the same time suffering. Contrary to thinking that my pain is not true, my mother tried to reconcile these two obvious objections: Daily and academic rhetorical criticism can reveal this dark side in both cases in two different ways. I will start everyday. First, politicians can easily become rhetoric critics, accept no remarks of other people, even maintain healthy skepticism, but what does it mean below the surface Carefully examine their words to decide. Recent politics shows some examples. A handful of people still believe that President Obama is the President unaffected by the evidence In order to improve the daily lives of people, Phaedra Pezzullo, a professor of communication and culture at Bloomington University of Indiana University, should try to understand rhetoric that people change their lives frequently and meaninglessly I say that. She wrote: "... rhetoric allows us to connect ... this is about how we are involved with the world." Daily living activities (ADL) are personal It is a term used in medical treatment to refer to. Daily self-care activity dwellings, outdoor environments, or both. Medical experts often have the ability or impossibility to perform ADL as a measure of human functional status, especially in the case of persons with disabilities or elderly. ADL is defined as "what we usually do", for example, it is defined as cultivating himself, bathing, clothesing, care, doing work, family, leisure, and so on.

In our country, regardless of strikes, conferences, parades, we observe non-violent protest action every day. Many of these demonstrations were found to be effective and respected over time. However, civil conflict and non-violent philosophy seem like widely accepted concepts today, but many of the people who fight such negotiations are considered extremists who bring them to society I will. Among these transcendents, Mr. Henry David Thoreau who wrote "civil disobedience", Mohandas Gandhi who wrote "Satya Graha", and Martin Luther gold who wrote "Birmingham Prison Letters" Although the philosophical concept was developed by Plato, Henry David Thoreau and transcendental transit began as a movement of extreme religious movement against the conservative system. Historically, according to Peter Carafiol's transcendence, "It was intellectual property born from Kant and mediated by Romanticism between England and Germany." Prior to that, it was a monotheistic relationship. As Kalafior said, protests and dissatisfaction with Protestantism and Catholicism. Transcendentalism is a philosophical movement developed in the eastern United States from the late 1820s to the 1830s. It resulted from reactions at the time to protest general intellectuals and spiritual conditions. The monotheistic church doctrine taught by Harvard Seminary is particularly interesting. Transcendence is based on the philosophy of transcendental theory derived from the idealism of Emmanuel Kant and German romantism, "Romanticism of England and Germany, John Gottfried Herder and Friedrich Schliermach's biblical criticism, David Humu's skepticism" . Miller and Versluis believe that Emanuel Swedenborg has a universal influence on transcendentalism. It is also strongly influenced by spiritual and spiritual philosophy, in particular Hindu texts on Upanishad. The modern transcendental philosophy was developed by a German philosopher Harald Holtz in a holistic approach. Holz freed the transcendence from the fusion of the new cantanism and critically discussed the transcendental pragmatism and the transcendental philosophy, the relationship between the new empiricism and the so-called postmodern. In everyday languages, "transcend" means "transcendence", "self transcendism" means transcending the form or state before you. This mysterious experience is considered to be a state of transcendental self transcendence, in particular, self recognition is abandoned there. "Self transcending" is psychologically measurable, considered (at least in part) genetic, and has been included in the temperament and personality list as a dimension of personality. Dean Hamer explains this finding in "The God Gene", which is criticized by critics like Carl Zimmer.

Why did not women get voting rights between 1900 and 1914. In the 19th century the voting system was classified as inequality. In some parts of the world, people can vote for people they want to manage, but in other areas only a few can rely on their wealth and excellence. At the moment, England's women's position is simple, at home, clean, cooking, caring for children, taking care of husbands. Women can not vote or talk about how to operate or control their own country. This is because women of various reasons between 1900 and 1914 could not gain the right to vote for this article between 1900 and 1914 which could not get women's voting rights I will explore. It is seeing feminist, feminist NUWSS which is the main influence of patriarchal society. , Publicity and other influences. By 1900, women have made many advances in education, legal rights and employment opportunities. But they still can not vote in the general election. Many women believe they are always second-class citizens before they gain basic rights to choose their members. I will explore the reason why women could not gain voting rights between 1900 and 1914. A revolution broke out in society from 1900 to 1914. In the UK patriarchal society, women live in their homes, have new moves, women want to vote. These "new" women face many obstacles, one of which is government skepticism. After failing to receive voting rights in November 1911, the WSP's (Women's Social and Political Alliance) began violent protests and began making their own obstacles. During 1900 women can not gain voting rights in the following articles Why in 1914 British ladies have no voting rights in the early 19th century I will discuss with you . You think that women should allow you to vote their arguments why I will tell you and arguments to women get voting rights. Most people dislike the idea that women have the right to vote. They probably can not make wisdom judgment on information on political issues because they have never had the opportunity to see w as women participate in politics, they also say that politics " I believe that I believe it is non-feminine "

Previously from middle English, inlighten, inlightnen, a mixture inspired from middle English ("inspire, illuminate"), from old English inlīhtan, onlīhtan, enlīhten ("to light up," " lightnen ("inspire, illuminate") (same as light + -en) Dutch inlichten ("Introduction, information"), old high German inliuhten ("Introduction, Illuminations"), Gothic ???????? ? (Inliuhtjan, "enlighten", "illuminate"). More inlight, -en Enlightenment (Third person singular form is now realized, now inspiration of participle, simple past and past participle understood) On 30th October 2016, Bernie Evans wrote to the Guardian Big Question as follows. The real responsibility lies in our dangerous hatred of politics. Rather than focusing on genuine dramas that might stimulate the audience, the BBC focuses not on its dramatic output to incorrect historical soap operas, but on conservative politics about that threat It is feared by the house. Please prove our past opinion. As your commentator shows, translators and publishers are aiming to help workers move by stimulating today's movements by providing lessons from the past. Mr. Pexnif warns that it should not be laughing or circling a dear friend and you have to clearly understand that you either answer your questions directly or refuse to be inside yourself not. I gave him inspiration for the mentioned topic Okay, men and girls, ready to enlightenment In this lesson I will introduce enlightenment. what is that? Enlightenment, also known as the age of enlightenment, was an intellectual movement from the late 17th century to the early 18th century, emphasizing reasons, individualism, and skepticism. Enlightenment challenged the traditional religious view. Because that was such a wide movement, enlightenment did not have an accurate start date. It did not pop up, but it gradually developed. Most historians came to the beginning of enlightenment from the middle of the 17th century to the beginning of the 18th century. The work of intellectuals like Rene Descartes, Barus Spinoza, Isaac Newton is particularly important for enlightenment. In particular, British enlightenment depends on the merit of Sir Isaac Newton whose "principle" shocked the world. His Opticks provided a perfect image of their intelligent enlightenment plan to enlightened thinkers by revealing the nature of the light. As Pope Alexander said, Voltaire is so admiring Newton that his mistress is "Venus - Newton." Newton's physics promises to unleash all the secrets of nature using just reason - do not forget that Newton believes in revelation and reason and writes many comments about the Bible.

Skeptical and Cartesian way In his first meditation, Descartes revealed every misunderstanding he got with amazing clarity and perseverance and decided what he really knew. In order to get rid of these "rotten apples", he developed a method of doubt to establish a fundamental belief without doubt. In addition to these, Descartes applies three levels of skepticism, which creates three levels. At that level, our thoughts may be fooled by mistakes. Organized suspicion has nature, but you do not need to think that knowledge is impossible to apply the method of doubt. Indeed, Descartes tried to apply the doubt method to his own existence. And it proved his famous saying "Cogito, Ergo Sam" (I therefore think so). In other words, Descartes tried to doubt his existence, but even his doubt proved that he showed that he was present as he was unable to doubt whether he did not exist. Both Montaigne and Descartes Montaigne and Descartes use a philosophical approach that focuses on using doubts to discover themselves and the world around them. But they are doubting different things. Descartes doubts all his previous knowledge, and Montagne suspects that knowledge has absolute certainty. I doubt that all of them are beginning their philosophical process, but Montagne suspects the constant and static self and Descartes doubts everything is present, and Descartes is undoubtedly sure I can overcome this doubt in order to find sex. "I'm often wondering what is true or true? Descartes ... Read more Descartes used his doubt to attack the principles that support everything he believes. The way of doubt is Descartes' basic question method and he doubts there is something there is no reason to doubt. Please think about that. Almost everything you think is true comes from a sense. However, senses sometimes deceive. It is unreasonable to completely trust them because the senses are not completely reliable. But if we assume that our senses are all wrong to us, this is a small belief. In fact, it seems absurd to say such a thing. Still, as Descartes pointed out, we often have the dream that everything we experience is a fiction of our imagination, or at least not a physical one. Therefore it is reasonable to temporarily doubt that our senses convey everything to us.

Along with the development of American civil society in the 18th and 19th centuries, religion has played an increasingly smaller role in everyday life. To solve this problem, a series of religious revival activities began: awakening. These are a series of attempts to revitalize beliefs about ignored beliefs, to achieve countless social reforms, and to use religious foundations to use political factions to have a profound impact on societal thinking Large-scale large-scale religious, social and political change. Historians said that the first awakening of the 1730s and the 1740s and the second awakening in the third awakening of the late 1950s and early 20th century. These renaissance was a part of the big romantic religious movement that struck mainly England, Scotland, and Germany, mainly in Europe. Just like the first big wake up half a century ago, the second reflection of romanticism is characterized by the passion for supernaturality, emotion and charm. It rejected skepticism, naturalism, and rationalism left from enlightenment. Almost at the same time, similar movements also flourished in Europe. Pietism swept the German countries. Evangelism in the UK is very strong In the 18th century the British Atlantic Ocean experienced the occurrence of Protestant resurrection, which is known as the first awakening. During the first big awakening, the evangelists came from several Protestant denominations. Congregational church, church member of British church, Presbyterian church. They supported a strong emotional reverence, rejecting the way of seemingly ineffective formal worship. Martin Luther and John Calvin have spread the doctrine of reading prophecies and the Bible, but the information of personal and empirical beliefs widened by new evangelical preachers transcend the learning of simple books. This is a particularly popular message for people rejected by traditional Protestants, especially women, young people, and those with low social diversity. Second awakening (1790s - 1840s): The second awakening (1790s - 1840s) promoted the emergence of Protestant majority Protestants in the American Civil War and created new sects and social reform organizations. The sugarcane tent conference in 1801 led by Barton Stone is considered to be the largest and most famous religious resurrection in the second great awakening. For details on the second big awakening, please click here. Religion: 1) Religious organizations different from larger religious movements and traditions. 2) Sociologists also call sects as religious groups that demand high demands from their members and maintain high tension with other members of society (Stark and Finke 2000: 144). For details about denominations, please click here.

Definition of postmodernism In order to accurately define what is postmodernism, we will first briefly consider the events and ideas that led to the development of this social theory school. After that, I will examine some general ideas in postmodern. I will mainly focus on the work of Jean-François Liotta and Jean Baudrillard. Then I think of David Harvey 's view that he is a Marxist most people consider writing as a post - modern tradition and believes post - modern is another form of capitalism. Postmodern is a very difficult concept to define. A French philosopher defined Postmodernism as "a suspect of all metanarathies", but this basically means skepticism about all claims of absolute truth. The elements and techniques used by postmodern authors raise doubts about their reading experiences and motivate readers to examine their own understanding of life and social value. - Hundred Years of Solitude - Magical Realism Centuries-old lonely magical realism is a literary form of strange, grotesque and dreamlike stories related, as the events are common. Magical realism is the opposite of the "one at a time" story style, and the writer emphasizes the wonderful quality of imaginary events. In a world of magical realism, the narrator talks about surrealism, so that of course it will be a reality Magical realism is the formal skill of the magical realism "Magical Realism" associated with post colonial and midnight children as post colonial devices for midnight children, "Linda Hachin wrote" It was chosen by many critics as one of the points of postmodernism and post colonialism (Hybrid) (131). She traces the origin of the magical realism of literary style as a country of Latin America and the Third World, which means the following changes from 'historical burden of modernism'. That is "self". Text '- consciously reestablish relationship with cam Postwar literature (post modern): Actually, this is the most difficult time to define this time. Especially there is no clear border between modernism and postmodern. However, all types of postwar periods, such as Samuel Beckett and the absurd drama related to Harold Pinter, and new models in poetry and novels, have experimental skills. Some of British literature's best writers are Philipp Larkin, Ted Hughes, Salman Rushdie, John Fowles, Kazuo Kazuo, Tom Stoppard.

The essence of human nature makes us human. What is the potential feature of distinguishing humans from animals and gods? Where is the essence of human essence? The first answer may seem simple. When comparing animals and humans, they are more cruel than humans, they are instinctively sending their lives, they do not love, and they do not try to educate each other. One day later. However, the scientific evidence going back to the history of human beings and the history of our human race to the predecessors of some apes suggests that human beings (well, their ancestors) are most likely to live in the same life I will prove it. What kind of people are there? What are the essences of them? What is the essence of human history? A human? Contrary to his predecessors of many intellectuals, Foucault attempted to critically test those and the reactions they caused, rather than answering these traditional, seemingly straightforward questions It was. He pointed out the most persistent skepticism about their reactions, including race, reasonable unity and spirit, progress and liberation, which became popular in Europe and America in the 19th century. He believes that these similarities will provide information for Hegel's phenomenology and Marxist materialism. He also believes that they also provided information on evolutionary biology, physical anthropology, clinical medicine, psychology, sociology and criminal science at the same time. The latter three fields are part of the French scientist human, or 'humanities'. As Feinberg explained, Marx believes that the essence of human nature is a clearing of the meaning of nature - we can say that it is the essence of the essence of human civilization. The essence of Marx 's human civilization is, of course, a concrete labor force, but the essence of Marx and Hegel' s labor is to clarify the meaning. The basic starting point of Marx 's materialist theory is that nature makes sense penetrate. Therefore, "objectivity" of human experience and alienation are not non-metaphysical, cultural and social relationships which not only separate them from the range of human speech and behavior but also influence the natural world. Finberg wrote, Separation of individuals occurs through objectiveization of humanization in God. In this context, intelligence as a true seed asset is the origin and essence of human projections, therefore it is the essence of religion, and all human beings and special human beings are still in humans I will. "The seed is not satisfied in the real world" (Schmieder 2004), so it separates itself and casts it on to God. However, according to Feuerbach, the opposite trend is the same. Through religion, "species-specific conflict" is realized first, and human nature is not in contact with humans (Schmieder 2004). curl

You are a foreigner and you are married to a Pakistani. My parents are from Pakistan. Or have a Pakistanian nationality. You are a foreigner, and your relatives (brother, sister, uncle, aunt) are Pakistani. Note: If you are married to a Pakistani citizen and your marriage is at least 5 years old, you can apply for POC. Historically it can be found that separating the two shared geographical groups can be very unpleasant (I think it is a creation in Pakistan). But the integration is equally uncomfortable. Please look at all PoC in the media. And they can not help but to express the same dissatisfaction. Caucasians are devilized everyday and are threatened by PoC and Antifa. "Do not complain about dissatisfaction" PoC is talking about unfair things happening to people because they are black or brown, or they are talking about what is happening to them. I saw both. Just because a lot of people complain that they are being abused, is not it boring for you? Are you fed up with listening to it? Is the video showing violence against these people enough to convince you that they were dealt with wrongfully? Or is your opinion influenced by white centralism? Do you mind that PoC is cruel? Or do you think this is fake news? Of course, in some cases, skepticism is necessary. PoC usually has a short life cycle. The goal is to decide whether to invest more. PoC is not usually handed to the end user (although feedback may be provided). In most cases, domain experts review PoC, evaluate against predefined criteria and make the next iteration and future investment decisions. If you succeed in validating the concept, you can develop a prototype, use it to raise funds or show it to potential customers. The third page («POC priority order») is dedicated to helping you decide whether to accept POC requests or not. You simply list all the POCs and evaluate their strategic value, potential and technical complexity ... Evaluating these standards is most likely for your business in the future It helps to emphasize the project. Let your scenearii work: Now it is the best time to change these big usage scenarios to different steps to prioritize in the product roadmap. At this stage we are talking about stories that may be related to one or more usage scenarios and priorities. One story is "I want this to be possible and I hope I can have such output".

Summary of zero concept in Aristotle's philosophy: This article shows that Aristotle created the first zero concept in the history of human thought. He rejects this concept because it obviously contradicts his basic principle of metaphysics and logic. The origin and development of mathematical symbols are closely related to the development of mathematics itself and the development of philosophy. This is because philosophy provides the driving force for investigating and creating good mathematical symbols with appropriate. Thomas Aquinas (around 1225 - 7 March 1274) incorporated Aristotle's philosophy into Christianity and established a Christian philosophy on the philosophical foundation of Christianity. This had a decisive influence on Aristotle's influence on Western history. By the death of Aristotle in 322 BC, the classical philosophy ended until the 3 rd century AD was called the Hellenistic era. In the first half of this period (until the middle of the 1st century BC), practical philosophy became flourishing, the three developed school styles or philosophy styles were stoicism, epicureanism, skepticism. In the second half of the Greek era, religious orientation was adopted and New Platonism was admired. Koin n nnoia is a term from St. Philosophy, influenced by Aristotle, from influential Greek philosophy in Rome. This refers to a common concept or common concept that can be born or passed through the sensory impression of the soul. Unfortunately, few of the actual Stoic texts are left and understanding of technical terms is limited. Koinósnoûs is the term used in the epic philosopher epitectus (III.vi.8). C.S. Lewis (1967, p. 146) believes that this is similar to intelligence in "common sense" of modern English meaning, "basic psychological equipment of ordinary people". He pointed out that sensus might be a translation of noûs (eg in the Vulgate Bible), but he only found an obvious Latin text case showing this obvious meaning This is a fable writer It is an article by Phaedrus. In etymology, the term metaphysics is not useful. It means "things after physics"; this was the one Aristotle's early students used to quote Aristotle's articles on what he called "the first philosophy", in Aristotle did. The first editor of the German editor was Andronis of Rhodes as the title of this paper. Aristotle distinguishes two issues for philosophers: Firstly, to examine the nature and character of what exists in the natural world or in a rational world; secondly, to explore the characteristics of "existence" and "characteristics" It is to explore the characteristics of. A substance without movement, or the most authentic substance, is an understandable reality in which everything in nature is causally related. Aristotle is not indifferent to the facts of natural philosophy and metaphysical philosophy, but likewise he does not mind any circumstance to build empirical test theory.

This research aims to investigate the stock markets of Middle Eastern countries in the framework of momentum and reverse strategy. Potential foreign investors who can invest directly in the Middle East's stock market need to investigate the recent history of these stock markets and understand the risks associated with high returns. Therefore, in this survey, we examined the stock market in the Middle Eastern countries from January 1997 to December 2010 and analyzed the performance under various momentum and opposite strategy. In the past eight years I have managed two portfolios in the public market, I did a few reverse bets. The first of these opposing gambars issued "All in" stocks in mid-2009. Not all reverse bets were done nicely, but many bets are available. This is a precious learning experience. So here are some stories about reverse calls and my lessons at Apple, Netflix, Facebook, Amazon, and Tesla. First of all, I would like to say that the stock / company that the reverse investor does not include or exclude investment is a problem. If people think that the potential of stock is significantly greater than consensus, opposing gambling may also happen. This difference may be due to the misunderstanding of most market participants. Therefore, the opposite view is not against the current state of the company, not against the current view of the market. Opponents' strategy cites "to defeat the market" and indicates that investors are doing the opposite of other investors. In other words, when someone else buys or sells, he buys or sells. Their logic is focused on the concept they buy when others sell stocks. When other investors realize that they are overreacting to bad news, the stock price rebounds to its basic value. Clear example is Royal Dutch and Shell stock price. It forms an alliance that binds profits on a 60 to 40 basis while maintaining an independent and independent entity. EMH reflects the price method, but the market deviates from the 60-40 equality of the two shares. When compared with Shell, the Royal Premium in the Netherlands is 8% to 10%, and if you are affected by the crisis, the parity will only expand. Shortening the encryption currency is one of the most difficult investment strategies. It relies on a perfect understanding of the investor's market and can of course use a highly complex strategy that will reverse (or doubt) and become investor for a certain period of time. In short, do so at your own risk and make sure you are receiving as much education as possible. The shortfall is not simply a matter of technology. If there is enough skepticism, the technology will not grow and the price will fall anyway. In order to become a good short seller, you must know that most people do not know. The higher the value of encryption, the higher the value of short selling. It is a difficult part to predict exactly when it will occur.

Douglas Light says that our imagination is better than answering questions. Difference between two genres: fantasy and fiction. He mentioned how fantasy can stimulate human imagination (it is more attractive), but the novel may be just a related story. Likewise, books and movies are very different entities. In a short-lived fable, readers tend to have a shameful relationship between pastors and transgender boys. Because they do not get all the details, the reader's curiosity is ignited. If Father Frinn is innocent or guilty, it is difficult to make a decision. Doubting John Patrick Shanley 's metaphor, he passed through the truth very well. Toys, camping trips, undershirt scenes caused confusion, the audience walked around in the mind and doubted Father Flint. According to law, people are said to be innocent until proved to be guilty, but in fact, I know that everyone is guilty before anyone is proved innocent . - A country that was suffering from one of severe drought, excessive cultivation, and the greatest depression in history. Sandstorm destroyed the crops people depend on for survival everywhere in the Great Plains I recently remembered John Patrick Shanley 's play "Doubt" after talking with my friend about the social needs for religion. The allegations established in 1964 organically revealed the evolution and importance of uncertainty using Catholic priests to abuse children. In the first reading, "alleged" seemed to focus on physical abuse in systematic religion, moral corruption, and suppression of gender discrimination. But from a deeper point of view, "doubt" emphasizes the relevance of uncertainty in cultures that can not truly be discussed. This movie is based on John Patrick Sanley's Pulitzer Prize-winning drama (doubt: fable) 2 This Oscar nomination work was written by Philip Seymour Hoffman. ) Between them shows a tension suspense. Pastor of a merciful Catholic school, supporting the progressive thoughts and empathy for unethical behavior; and Sister Aloisius (Merrills Trip) - the pastor is a traditional principal and the pastor is confident The focus of students' sexual abuse critics who are convinced are different, but almost all praise comments have a common theme. The movie is magnificent and complicated, as the end of the movie is ambiguous and eventually remains in the same painful state. This scene seems to overcome the skepticism of a seemingly sure sister of Aloysius - a country which can not be reconciled.

Over the years, evangelisers have made many progress in American society. Evangelism is a movement that caused a series of revival from the 17th century to the 19th century, also known as "great awakening". Resurrection happened almost every church age. The first big awakened changed the way of modern evangelism and the management of the church today. It is important to understand what is great awakening, what caused it, and what great arousal produced. Understanding the history of the United States must include understanding the role of religion in the establishment and development of the country. People learn about the Americans by learning about the great awakening, the second great awakening, the social gospel, and the rights of Christianity. In New England in particular, the morality of Puritan became the basis of the special role of colonies and new states in God's plan. Definition of big awakening. A big awakening is an era of religious awakening and reform. This is a series of religious resurrections that struck the American colonies led by Evangelical Protestant pastors. The great awakening was caused by a trip to the UK gospel minister, George Whitefield. The first big awakening began in 1725 and continued until 1750. The second awakening began in the early 1800s. The third and fourth Renaissance inspired by the great awakening took place from 1880 to 1910 and from the late 1960s to the early 1970s. This article covers the first and second big awakenings that took place during the American colonial era. Historians said that the first awakening of the 1730s and the 1740s and the second awakening in the third awakening of the late 1950s and early 20th century. These renaissance was a part of the big romantic religious movement that struck mainly England, Scotland, and Germany, mainly in Europe. Just like the first big wake up half a century ago, the second reflection of romanticism is characterized by the passion for supernaturality, emotion and charm. It rejected skepticism, naturalism, and rationalism left from enlightenment. Almost at the same time, similar movements also flourished in Europe. Pietism swept the German countries. Evangelism in the UK is very strong The second awakening resurrection began in New England in the 1790s. The general feeling is lower than the big awakening, the second awakening leads to the establishment of universities and seminary, and to the organization of Church of Mission. During this period, the state of Kentucky was also influenced by the resurgence ... Another resurgence, the second awakening (about 1795-1835) began in the United States. During this revival, meetings were held in small towns and large cities across the country, a unique border agency - camp meeting began. The second big awakened created tremendous growth

Philosopher Erich Flsm was born in the early 20 th century and can witness all its major developments (cherries). It not only brings advances in technology and new ideology, it also brings tough tasks that humans have never seen before. He considered the motivation behind aggression and violence, which led him to study psychology and sociology (Cherry). Fromm's last job "To To or To Be" (1976) is the culmination of his efforts to find and explain the goals of human life. He believes that our existence will be driven by the existence or the mode of existence and explains this point using psychological discoveries combined with sociological evidence. "Human disobedience continues to evolve, human history begins with disobedient behavior and can not be ended with obedience" - ErichFlåm - About disobedience - "We kill at every stage Sho "We will be killed when we close our eyes to see poverty, pain, shame, not just war, riots, executions. As long as there is despotic skepticism, we can kill a lot of the future among young men. ": - German poet and novelist Hermann Hesse Erich Flåm's work is not a psychology or philosophical book, but is not a pleasant one, but it is a clearer way to explain the language of life, fresh and true criticism of society, its superficial and hypocrisy. Please respect individuals, and ultimately humanity as a whole. Regardless of human beliefs, religion and ideology, we must be convinced that for human life and dignity it should not be used as a means to achieve the purpose. Another weakness is the lack of leadership approach on how to accomplish the love of life and the modern people clearly face many obstacles beyond his control. I think that it is a challenge to the reader himself how to accomplish the fruitful hope and love that is conceived in this book, transcending the obvious social illness being discussed.

In recent decades, democratic election management institutions underwent major changes in the construction and operation of countries around the world. The birth of the election system of the new democratic country and the transformation of the old democracy have contributed to this broad trend. In many democratic electoral system changes, the number of distant political parties is increasing dramatically in niches competing for work in a particular election. The increase in population of these parties has created many interesting possibilities for party research, especially how these new parties deal with the mainstream party's old policies and strategies. For over 10 years, the discussion on the maximum revival has bothered free mainstream factions. There is no doubt that trends in elections have broadly benefited against opposition to the party's rights of the Democratic Party. But in Europe there is not a long-term breakthrough in the expected elections. The Australian election in 2016 and the final day forecast for the 2017 Dutch and French elections have not been achieved. However, the story of supernationalism, populism, anti-immigrants and terrorists who won more than 5 million votes in Germany has a more symbolic meaning. So far, the success of AfD is the most serious evidence, and is the chapter of postwar liberalism already on the spiral of death? Is there evidence that the legendary liberal consensus after the war is a noble but short-term one, not "the end of history" of victory? We are seeing the emergence of extremely right parties in the mainstream European politics. EU skeptics after the euro area and the use of racist rhetoric to exploit the uncontrollable immigration crisis, these parties are winning voters in continental countries. Below are the guidelines for the rebellious top 10 rebellious highest institutions (some new organizations, established organizations). The biggest election success in Europe: Since September 2016, Germany's AfD was represented by 10 of the 16 German Legislatures. Last year the anti-Islamic policy replaced the focus of skepticism in Europe and the slogan "Muslim is not part of Germany" was held at the party's spring meeting. The support rate has declined in recent months: AfD's voting result is 8%, its leaders Frauke Petry and JörgMeuthen said the AfD politician's speech stopped German Nazi sin's atonement Urged This year, the Austrian Liberal Party, the German Alternative Party (AfD) Party, and the Slovak People's Party gained significant benefits in the election. The other most partisan political parties, such as the Geert Wilders People's Liberal Party in the Netherlands, the People's Party of Denmark, Jobbik in Hungary, Golden Dawn in Greece, the National Front of France, have spread rapidly. The political parties of the European Parliament are organized by formal political groups and are cooperating in policy making and voting through them. The Conservative Party of England dominates the Conservative Party of Europe and the Reform Organization (ECR). It has become the third largest force in the European Parliament since the election in May 2014. In addition to the ECR Conservative Party, there are several very right-wing neo-Nazi compassionates.

The Sunday morning revival tradition is part of modern Christianity. Most people think about resurrection on Sunday morning. It seems to imply that there is now time when Jesus was raised from death in all sunrise prayers. But Jesus said, "Because Jonah spent three days and three nights in the whale's whale, the Son of Man will be in the center of the earth three days and three nights" (Matthew 12:40). 2 hours Jesus defines the length of the day in John 11: 9, Gospel. Jesus is dead and everyone can be forgiven. But is he dead so that no one repents? Jesus said to them when Jesus appeared to his disciples after the resurrection. "This is what is written, Messiah suffers at the third day and rises from the death, beginning in Jerusalem, all the countries have this name:" We infringe part of God's creation When we do, we are far from the way, because we are all part of the body of Christ, when we break into other people, we hurt ourselves, hurt our community, And we hurt the body of Christ.We hurt God himself We broke all these relationships Repentance restores normality and restores all broken relationships It is our job to do. The record of the resurrection of Jesus is written in the Gospels. Jesus said this in Luke 24: 46-48, "He said to them," This is written: Christ suffered on the third day, risen from the death, repentance of sin and forgiveness You will be told under his name: you, the people of the land that started in Jerusalem, you are a witness to these things "The evidence of Jesus' resurrection began with the witness of the witness who lived with him and walked It was. The fact that many of these people later died is not seriously due to their testimony. This is a witness who has existed for 2,000 years. The scholars proposed many theories about the ceremony of Jesus' resurrection. Christian scholars such as Dale Allison, William Lane Craig, Gary Habermas and N. T. Wright concluded that Jesus was raised from the death. "At the seminar he was not raised from the death, the grounds for the resurrection were fantastic experiences of Peter, Paul, Mary." EP Sanders said it is difficult to condemn the early witness with deliberate fraud. I insisted. : Has Jesus really risen from the dead? Although the story of Jesus' resurrection is the core of Christianity, few people know the historical reasons of faith. This Easter festival is probably not a lazy skepticism or a blind faith but a choice to the historical Jesus faith. In this latest SHORT / ANSWERS episode you can see Easter in the new light. I would like to know if Dr. Bannister believes in the greatest resurrection story in the Gospel. It is one of many Matthew saints. Clearly people were making a story of resurgence at that time - Matthew obviously made up the greatest resurrection story. So, if they could make the biggest stories about resurrection, how about Jesus? Uh

Super psychology of hyper psychology term from "supernatural phenomenon" is not only science of psychology. Can demonstrate scientific consciousness Psychology research Unique experience and unknown function of the human mind is not yet recognized by science Interaction with the physical world of the path is scientific research ability I can not go beyond that. I explained two kinds of hyper psychological phenomena. The first and less commonly is pyschokinesis (PK), which is a direct influence on the human mind environment. Paraphrastically paraphrastically paraplastic paraplaxis paralysis parapraxis parapraxes parapsychologic parapsychologic parapsychologically parapsychologically parapsychologist hyper psychology parapsychologist of parapsychology para coat para coat paraglider parasang parasangs paraglider parasender parasenders parasitic protozo parasitic parasitic parasitic parasitic parasitical parasitism parasychologists parasitism Insects parceled dried parches parboiling individual boiled parches parboils boiling Parataxis parathyroid paratone paratones paratrooper paratars parasitic parashes parasol soldiers umbrella paratars paratyphids minesweepers minesweepers tied parasitic parasols parasol Super psychology - The subject of controversy is the study of the causes of mental abilities and the use of life after death and scientific methods. Super psychology experiments were included to test the sensory perception, human and animal subjects and Ganzfeld experiments using a random number generator to test predictive evidence and spirit. Phantom - Franz Josef Gal rose and the skull is now a dead system to determine the personality traits by feeling the physiology of the 18th century. In terms of your previously recorded words, in the use of "pseudoscience" Francois Magen diploys what is called "today's pseudoscience" that people can be read from the skull with a thoroughly trusted collective character It is assumed that Independent evaluators and researchers of the hyper psychology phenomenon exist and questioned the scientific validity of super psychology research. In 1988, the National Academy of Sciences issued a report on the subjects to be concluded "The research conducted over 130 years has a psychological phenomenon of scientific evidence." It was accepted there Instead of the theory of super psychology, a variety of conflicts and often conflicting models have been proposed to explain the supernatural phenomena reported by various psychologists. In his book pseudo-science and paranormal (2003) wrote by Terence Hinds: "We need to explain the parapsychologists what PSI's theory happened to go forward for skepticism, this is too It seems to be a theoretical construction.The theory to explain the phenomenon as early as yet does not seem to be mature, proved convincing. "

Towards the definition of modernism Lawrence B. Gamma's article "Definition of Modernism", despite the typical modernism work, addresses the challenges that critics face when developing a coherent theoretical modernist model I outline it. - As of this article in 1987 - is over 60 years old. In fact, the large number of academic papers and papers discussed and discussed about the definition of modernism indicates that modernism is a term, its only unresolved agreement is ambiguous in meaning There is that. Postmodern is a very difficult concept to define. A French philosopher defined Postmodernism as "a suspect of all metanarathies", but this basically means skepticism about all claims of absolute truth. The elements and techniques used by postmodern authors raise doubts about their reading experiences and motivate readers to examine their own understanding of life and social value. Postmodern writers use good examples of postmodern compositions such as satire, magical realism, fragmentation of short stories read by women. It is equally difficult to accurately define when postmoderns are established, it is not easy to define under absolute definition. Postmodern is a term that incorporates many visual culture, which is expressed by sociologist Jurgen Habermas as "a stage of modernism". In her book "Graphic Design Theory", Meredith Davis describes postmodernism as "a combination of techniques and styles of modernism and more sympathetic to the audience." Davis attributed these vague origins to the fact that both postmodernism and postmodernism resulted from post industrialism. In addition, postmoderns break the high culture and universality of modernism, "white age-oriented aesthetics, mainly European progressive intellectuals" (Davis, 190). What kind of preference does this brake problem have? Postmodernism does not claim the essence of absolute truth or the truth itself. Postmodern can be seen as an extension of modernism. It does not limit the concept of truth to observable concepts. Postmodernism is inclusive. Postmoderns do not permit the definition of something. There are several explanations for this phenomenon. While modernism emphasizes racial classification, postmodern emphasizes cultural and racial classification. Postmodernism sanctions the differences of family, family and people within the range of cultural parameters.

2002 is a very difficult year for airlines and this trend will last for a long time. Indeed, since September 2002, the two-digit passenger growth rate was seen again, but these figures compare the current interest rate with the data since September 11, so you can deceive it . Also, marked growth in the market is not expected in 2003. The attack on Iraq strengthened skepticism. It also requires a food industry in the aviation industry, also known as the aircraft catering industry. Sky Chef was originally established in 1942 and is a wholly owned subsidiary of American Airlines. LSG Sky Chefs is the world's largest in-flight service provider, from catering and procurement to equipment management, comprehensive in-flight service management. LSG Sky Chefs serves approximately 260 airlines for over 200 food and beverage facilities in 45 countries. In addition, LSG Lufthansa Service Holding AG is active in various fields of airport, event, theater, transportation catering and gradually expands its convenient catering solutions department in the United States. The structural integration of LSG and Sky Chefs was completed in 2002. The group turned around and announced again strong segmentation results LSG Sky has more than 300 airlines around the world, of which 214 airports manages 200 customer service centers in 51 countries, producing and producing about 591 million food products annually. The LSG Sky Chef has officially opened in Auckland, New Zealand. Customer service center was established under long-term contract with New Zealand Airlines. The building is in a production area of ​​2,500 square meters and approximately 500 employees are produced daily by international airline customers such as New Zealand Airlines, Emirates Airlines, Korean Air, LAN Aviation, Qantas Airways, Singapore Airlines, Air Carlin I will. 17,000 meals and 7,000 fresh foods and virgin Australia, Qatar Airways, Emirates, China Southern Airlines, and local retailers. I am the administrator of LSG Sky Chef Auckland.

For 11 million babies born in the USA everyday, they are advised to vaccinate a series of vaccines to prevent 11 different diseases (Herlihy, Hagood). Immunization is a biological precaution that enhances immunity against certain diseases. They have existed for many years, including the risks and benefits of receiving them. Most children begin vaccinating these vaccines at birth. The most common vaccines they vaccinate during the first few months of life are hepatitis B virus, rotavirus, pertussis, influenza and pneumococcal vaccines. The history of the vaccine includes obvious risks and injuries. But over and over again, doctors, scientists and governments have changed the vaccine and vaccine policy to make the vaccine safer. Sometimes changes are made to eliminate concerns that are relatively unfounded but widely felt, such as removing thiomersal from the vaccine. Nevertheless, supporters of vaccines should continue to appreciate the need for ongoing research to identify and mitigate the slight dangers posed by vaccines and even minor risks. This book combines the history of vaccination and anti-vaccination campaigns by Hotez as a personal history of autistic fathers and vaccine scientists. In short, these stories are so convincing why vaccines are one of the most important tools for humans to fight disease and why they oppose these life saving measures that require our urgent attention It leads to a certain argument. But is Hotez talking to a changing person, or is he still able to calm the vaccine? I asked this, if he had experienced cyber bullying, why the public health community could not protect the vaccine, and there was no direct solution to the question of skepticism of the vaccine. This is our conversation, the length and clarity of the editor Vaccines since the 11th century See the timeline of the preventable disease detection and the history of epidemic diseases and vaccine development; participate in activities to learn how to make and work vaccines; and Philadelphia doctor parents and / or medical professionals A vaccine history website developed by the university that gains access to immune resources for the home

Evolutionary ethics and moral abstract that can be supported biologically: Consider the paradox of altruism: The existence of true altruistic behavior is difficult to harmonize with evolution if natural selection only works for individuals. I am willing to sacrifice their adaptability. Reason for others. Evolutionists often rely on group selection assumptions to explain the existence of altruism; however, since morality is a group phenomenon and group selection is a multi-group phenomenon, group selection can explain the evolution of morality Can not. Evolution theory is an exploration field that explores how evolution theory influences understanding of ethics and morals. The scope of problems in evolutionary ethics research is very broad. Advocates of evolutionary ethics argue that it is very important in the field of descriptive ethics, norm ethics and meta ethics. Descriptive evolutionary ethics includes biological methods based on so-called evolutionary ethics, which shape human psychology and behavior. These methods are based on scientific fields such as evolutionary psychology, social biology, behavioral science, etc. and try to explain the moral behavior, ability, and tendency of a specific human being by evolutionary terms. For example, it is almost universally believed that incest incest is morally wrong and may be interpreted as evolutionary adaptation to promote human survival. Evolutionary ethics and moral abstract that can be supported biologically: Consider the paradox of altruism: The existence of true altruistic behavior is difficult to harmonize with evolution if natural selection only works for individuals. I am willing to sacrifice their adaptability. Reason for others. - Emotional intelligence and altruism tend to predict altruistic tendencies using emotional intelligence (EI). Human altruism like love and empathy is part of human "human". That's why people are away from beasts. The most widely accepted form of evolutionary ethics is descriptive evolutionary ethics. Descriptive evolutionary ethics seeks to explain various moral phenomena in whole or in part by genetic terms. Included ethical topics include altruistic behavior, congenital fairness, normative guidance, emotions of kindness or affection, self-sacrifice, incestuous incest, avoidance of parents, loyalty within the group, monogamous , And competitiveness and retaliation. Emotions, moral 'cheating' and hypocrisy By contrast, the objective of normative (or normative) evolutionary ethics is not to explain ethical behavior, but to prove or publish a specific normative ethical theory or claim. For example, some supporters of normative evolutionary ethics argue that evolutionary thinking will compromise the broad view of the moral superiority of some people against other animals. Evolutionary meta-ethics asks how evolutionary theory influences ethical discourse theory, objective moral values, and the possibility of objective moral knowledge. For example, among evolutionary ethicists, seeking evolution theory seeks to protect various forms of moral anti-realism (roughly arguing that objective moral facts do not exist) and moral skepticism

Faith Christians have their own responsibility at the beginning and the end of life Christians believe in the dignity of life, and all life is horrible. Because God has created all life, only he can take it. In Corinthians Chapter 1 1, we point out that the body is a shrine and should be taken care of. If a woman is pregnant, then a child is considered a gift from God, and everything God does is justified by him. Roman Catholics believe abortion is murder. They use the phrase "Do not kill" in the Ten Commandments to support this, because they think that it applies to abortion as well. In addition, Christian faith shows that they have double citizenship in both heaven and the Earth kingdom. They believe that they are responsible for living on the earth, meeting others, meeting their needs, and living for eternal life in heaven. This means that they should invest in the two kingdoms, everything they do should include this idea. In the second Corinthians chapter 9, verse 12-13 (Biblical translation), he says: If we start thinking about all the gray parts of Christian life, let us know if the belief we have is based on a solid biblical understanding of grace, gospel, and loyalty to God's word Let's start asking. When coming up in front of brothers and sisters to talk about any topics, my opinion is in the word of God I have read and learned, whether ambiguous or absolute (for example, Christ is God and perfect) It is rooted. , Secular customs, or pressure from peers. In addition, I insist on my own opinion on these things. Because I do not believe in the Bible or make reasoning inferences in various ways. I think this is according to Ephesians 5: 22-23 and Colossians 3: 18. (If you are more interested, you can read: http: //www.desiringgod.org/messages/god-created-man-male-and-female-what-does-it-mean-to-be-complementarian ) Stark did not try to deny the Christian faith everywhere, that is, God worked at the beginning of the Christian movement. Instead, he wants to study this fast-growing approach. He believes that social science ends several generic and permanent myths about the rapid growth of Christianity. The meaning of this transition from one religious organization to another religious organization is that the middle class and the privileged class tend to convert from the lowest class. Stark has to "leave them a new religion all the time through traditional religious weakness in market openness", and "religious skepticism is the most common among more privileged people" (37). Why is this happening? Stark believes that the person who best understands the new religion and who believes in the necessity of faith is the most economically privileged (39).

Plato defines rhetoric as 'art of dominating human thought' (Bloom). A refined person is a rhetorical and comprehensive leader of excellence. Their teachings flourished in the 5th century BC. Through the work of Protagoras, Gorgias, Antiophon, and other sophisticated craftsmen, the people of Athens received higher education and ceased accepting everything they teach as absolute facts. The question to this traditional philosophy school ultimately led to the emergence of other ideas such as skepticism. In ancient Greece, sophisticated people ('skilled' or 'smart' from Sophos) are known for teaching his philosophy and rhetorical skills, excellence and virtue, and passively accepting doctrine It was. It is to collect money to provide knowledge and wisdom. This situation was then ruined by Socrates and Dialectic, Socrates' method or his new method of achieving truth and wisdom through Moscow's research. As Socrates believes that everyone is telling the truth, he can take it out instead of distributing the truth. Teachers should help students produce the truth they carry, as it is confident that women help create new lives. This approach is based on a question and answer dialogue where the ultimate goal is to stimulate critical thinking. Socrates was not a worshiper; he never took money for his teachings, and refused refinement of refinement. On the other hand, sophisticated people are teaching money. I do not do Socrates. On the other hand, sophisticated people use languages ​​to raise controversy and influence people's opinion, regardless of facts. Socrates uses the language to gain the truth. Socrates is an independent person. He does not want to belong to any category. His "satire" and "satire" were not paid. Therefore, he is a professional, not an awkward person. Socrates is really worried about why young people are very disappointed. The young Socrates' students were particularly disappointed in him. If Socrates can know exactly how a father can not properly educate their son, he can save the city and rebuild the past glory of Athens. An interesting idea of ​​Socrates is that human excellence is true knowledge. Many citizens of Athens, including Sophist, do not like Socrates teaching. Socrates was condemned not to defile young people by introducing strange gods but to deny gods recognized by the state. Indeed, he truly believes in God, he just questioned them. However, he was tried in front of 501 jurors. Socrates taught his conscience to teach him, and he will keep teaching as long as he is alive. He even asked the province to offer pensions for his longstanding work. He was found guilty and convicted with a few votes and 60 votes, and he was firmly standing before the trial and sentenced to death.

Shakespeare's "Hamlet" is a tragedy about murder, betrayal, revenge, madness, moral corruption. It touches philosophical ideas such as existentialism and relativism. Prince Hamlet often questioned about the meaning of life and the decline in morality as he was plagued by his father's murder, mother's incest and adultery, and what he should, and should not do. Originally he was in a depressed state, when his mother got married to his uncle, he was still mourning the loss of his father. After learning about his uncle's betrayal and adultery of his mother, his negative side has further declined. Shakespeare is an existentialist, mainly a work on repeated themes and existentialism, and Hamlet is no exception. As a tragedy of revenge, Hamlet was superior in his many aspects of morality, intellectuals, and forced confrontation, and brought about a big psychological impact. Thanks to politician John Wolfgang von Goethe, a famous German writer who accepted Hamlet's invitation. You may be familiar with the metaphor of Goethe's old gemstone In Shakespearean play "Hamlet", you can see a speech or monologue showing Hamlet's emotion. His philosophy is unique as he relies on existential values ​​and life. Hamlet's isolation surpasses the benefits of all the people he is concerned with. His separation from himself, the threat of hostile forces and absurd life have contributed to Hamlet's isolation and existentialism. Due to the urgency of death and the current importance, eventually Hamlet needed to get his own fatal damage and enter the world of the dead. Even an existentialist will now be buried alone and will still be isolated and alienated from the world Hamlet is often seen as a philosophical person who explains what is described as relativity, existentialism, and skepticism. For example, when he told Rosencrantz: "There is neither good nor bad, but by thinking it is so," he expresses a subjective view. There is nothing in the truth except in the minds of individuals rooted in Greek topists. They believe that they can not perceive anything but senses. There is no absolute truth, there is only relative truth. The most obvious example of existentialism lies in the speech "Whether or not".

Kornilov Case James Joel described Kornilov as "a failed attempt to army Putsch by the right wing in the 1870 European book" (p. 230). This view reflects the government's official version at the time. In this article we will look at how accurate this version of the Kornilov event is. The Cornirov case officially began when L.C. Cornirov ordered a corps in Petrograd to violate the interim order of interim government secretary Alexandre Kerensky on 9th September [1]. The Cornirov case, or the Cornilov coup d'etat, was an attempt by the military coup against Russia by General Russian Army General Commander Lavrkoloniro from August 27 to 30, from September 10 to 13, 1917. The interim government led by Alexandre Kerensky and Petrograd Soviet is represented by soldiers and workers. Due to the wide range of confusion among stakeholders, the exact details and motivation of Kornilov incident have not been confirmed. Therefore, many historians summarized various historical records. Schools of various ideas surrounding the Cornirov case provided very different interpretations and caused discussions among historians. Mark D. Steinberg introduced inconsistent beliefs and political views in the Kornilov case. He stated that the case was "a picturesque mixture of intrigue and confusion." After this attempt was discontinued, many citizens expressed skepticism about the actual situation between Kornilov and Kerensky. On the left, people who defended Kornilov believe that Kerensky deliberately planned to take control of power, but expressed publicly disapproval to become a messianic messenger. Another aspect Steinberg emphasized was that the right woman believed Kerensky opposed Kornilov. Therefore, the opinion on this incident will further perpetuate the separation between the rightist party and the leftist party.

Russian immigrants in the 1990s, incredible immigration waves in the US Soviet Union region. "Free" immigrants have decided to grasp the opportunity to pursue a better life, leaving everything they possess. They bring education, a lot of skills and talent. However, their difficulties such as being unable to quickly adjust social attitudes to adapt to foreign languages, age, new values, succeeded in successfully conquering the "American Dream" (Fox 79). Bolshevik's victory in the Russian civil war seems guaranteed, and most Americans aspiring to return to the country began to swarm in the Soviet Union Russia. Most of the people of this wave have not been officially assigned, but the immigration policy of the Bolshevik regime in the first few years was relatively open. As early as 1919, Lenin worked on foreign workers to help Soviet comrades build socialism. In the same year - this is also the year the CPUSA was founded - the Soviet empathy of Soviet and American founded the Soviet Technical Assistance Association (STASR) to speed up and coordinate the movement of skilled workers to Soviet Russia Did For more than 15 years, I lived in the diverse Busterton and Somuton communities in Northeast Philadelphia where hundreds of hardworking Soviet migrants worked. I am an Armenian and Russian immigrant and talked with dozens of Russian-Americans throughout the election cycle. I soon discovered that most readers think that it is not surprising that most Russian-Americans voted for cards in November. Regarding the explanation of the charm of the cards, however, I realized that the real culprit is quite different from just a non-anti-leftist, his authority is ambiguous, a peaceful rice-rush relationship, and conservative towards women I am keen to attitude. These explanations may apply to some people, but they did not explain my passion for Hillary · Clinton. When searching for an answer, I ask for clues from my family. This week, there was an interesting article in the Atlantic Ocean which examined the voting model of Russian-American immigrants escaping from the Soviet Union. That title is "Why Russian immigrants hate Barney Sanders and Love Donald Trump." Of course, considering my parents' similar trip from my family history and occupation of the Soviet Union in Lithuania 30 years ago to the United States, it piqued my interest. So I read this article and tried to absorb the theme. Given the large government, unprotected all-weather monitoring, high taxation, and their skepticism of anti-life measures, this voting group tends to be small but conservative. People living under tyranny, including my parents, refuse to support people trying to revive in the United States (left or right).

"On the other hand, among us," righteous people rely on living faith. " Now, if you make a positive assertion, you will deprive faith. Regarding the truth of invisible things, unless we believe them, we can not achieve a happy life This is life forever This is a problem. Ignorous people insist that even he does not know that they can not know because he can not "know" that he is still alive. Knowing or "do not know" means a living subject, but in this case skepticism avoids the appearance of the error itself by not knowing whether they are alive or not Show me yourself, Make a mistake; it is a person who is not alive to be wrong. If we hold a positive consent, this should not be considered a higher wisdom, in fact it should not be considered a dementia. "- 3 likes An analysis of St. Augustine 's faith, hope, interpretation of love, John E. Rotelle, O. SA. Introduction h. You have been saved. Beauty of wisdom by faith b. Wisdom is like godliness. When God c we are really free. God wants us to be worshiped with faith, hope, and love. Take orders to you; d. Manual origin commands what you are about to do. From the beginning of faith to the end of k. God's grace through our vision of the Lord Jesus Christ f. Your heart must be burning. Jesus was born to Mary with great love. The Son of God and the Son of Man The creed and the Lord's prayer are full of grace. Without hope, love can not exist. Born in the Holy Spirit, there is no hope of love, neither can it. Without faith, the Holy Spirit is not a father. The meaning of my son 2. Faith in God The gift for God is the reason to make things. Jesus is called sin, the goodness of the Creator. Mystery of baptism b It is not like "confession", "city of God", "hope of faith", "love", and "love". "Enchiridion" means "manual" in Greek This brief book is a pocket guide for Christian doctrine. Augustine wrote this book in response to Lawrence who asked the saint to give him a handbook to explain the meaning of Christian. To accomplish this task, Augustine chose three theological virtues as a structure. Can mature saints refine elements of simple Christian life to simple manuals? Augustine surely tried it. At the age of sixty and in the process of writing the city of God he wrote a handbook on the living of Christians called Enchiridion on faith, hope, and love. Among the 93 main works of Augustine, this small content (Greek is a "handbook") shows his most complete picture of the life before God. The driving force of this manual is Laurentius. He asked Augustine to write a short story about the correct worship of God, the meaning and realization of the main purpose of our life, and the correct foundation of Christian faith. He obviously sought a "handbook": instead of leaving dust on the shelf his hands in his hands!

Looking for more data and statistics? For more information on the latest statistics and risks about suicide please visit the CDC website www.cdc.gov/ViolencePrevention/ suicide / index.html. Health care workers can help suicide prevention by understanding risk factors and using evidence-based therapies and treatments. In addition, the Joint Committee recommends using proven, population-specific tools to screen suicide risks of all patients in all medical settings. Clinicians should be informed that it is no longer acceptable to "sign a safety contract" with the patient. The management and limitation of safety plans for future suicide ideas (elimination or ensuring the safe storage of potentially fatal items) has proven to be an effective way to prevent suicide. Healthcare professionals can find educational materials on the Zero Suicide website or find news on the latest research at NIMH's website www.nimh.nih.gov. For general information on mental health and regional treatment services in your area, please call the help abend for drug abuse and mental health service management (SAMHSA) treatment (1-800-662-HELP (4357)) . SAMHSA also has its own web site behavior therapy locator that can be searched by location In the suicide prevention program, the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline encourages to ask questions when worrying about suicide. Let's ask the person, "Are you considering suicide?" Do not worry about putting out ideas or making you uneasy. People who are considering suicide are often relieved because someone is worried about asking them. If you are considering suicide ask if you have something that you can keep, like weapons and drugs, to help them keep them safe. Listen to their opinions without any judgment and ask if there are other people who are willing to talk to them. If they want to talk to family, friends, therapists, or religious leaders, please help them connect. And keep in touch - If you know that someone is struggling, please contact them regularly to make sure they are okay It is complicated to ask the child whether there is a risk of suicide. In this short video we ask parents to ask and answer some of these questions, but more importantly, parents are asked to understand if their children are at risk of suicide Answer I will show you how to ask these questions until I get. .... And what to do Kant's paternal moral opinion on suicide interventions suggests that the latter has a large problem of rationality of suicidal behavior. In the case of KP, the central question asked about suicide is whether or not suicide reasonably determined that it is consistent with her chosen purpose, regardless of what its purpose is. Some philosophers have proposed a priori reasons for rational skepticism. If that sounds, these arguments will indicate that the concept of 'reasonable suicide' is conceptual irrationality. But they are obviously not perfect. These arguments are based on the concept of epicurus, ie the rationality to end human life depends on comparing the life that continues to coexist with the state of death. Assuming that death is not a human condition, or at least not a state of human experience, the rationality of suicide becomes difficult to understand.

In any part of the game, there is no simple statement that Father Flynn has experience with boy who changed them, in addition to basketball practice and intimate relationship with Donald Muller, but through their imagination they Fron Fron is these shameful scenes of accusations. . The audience was always skeptical about the character's intention and motivation. This metaphor is full of indirect concepts, assumptions, gossip. So why is this metaphor so interesting? It is easy - the reader uses their imagination to summarize the relationship they repeatedly suspect their beliefs and made the thought of opposition possible. Suspicion is a 2008 American movie directed by John Patrick Shanley, based on the Pulitzer Prize and the Tony Award winning stage theater Doubt: A Parable. This film was produced by Scott Rudin and was held by St. Nicholas School led by Aloysius' sister (Meryl Streep). James Sister (Amy Adams) to Aloysius and Flynn Father (Philip Seymour Hoffman) said private concern with school's only black student, Donald Miller (Joseph Foster), is too high. Hughes started Crusades against Flynn. Also in the movie Viola Davis' mother, Donald Miller, Mrs. Miller. This movie is based on John Patrick Sanley's Pulitzer Prize-winning drama (doubt: fable) 2 This Oscar nomination work was written by Philip Seymour Hoffman. ) Between them shows a tension suspense. Pastor of a merciful Catholic school, supporting the progressive thoughts and empathy for unethical behavior; and Sister Aloisius (Merrills Trip) - the pastor is a traditional principal and the pastor is confident The focus of students' sexual abuse critics who are convinced are different, but almost all praise comments have a common theme. The movie is magnificent and complicated, as the end of the movie is ambiguous and eventually remains in the same painful state. This scene seems to overcome the skepticism of a seemingly sure sister of Aloysius - a country which can not be reconciled. To my day, based on John Patrick's Pulitzer Prize-winning drama, my favorite Amy Adams movie is suspected of being a priest who asks him about his relationship with a boy. The appearance of Philip Seymour Hoffman (and Hi!) And Meryl Streep suspected of being an attractive movie will not exceed that popularity in 1 to 40 minutes. Although movies based on drama are usually boring and embarrassing, most signature scenes have been running for a long time, but sometimes each clip can take 10 to 15 minutes, but the characters are drawn very well and the dialogue level is high is. The scene is felt shorter than the actual intelligence. Adams is very good for James' sister, she is truly innocent and trusts the people around her, but when she believes that sacred trust is broken, inner grief

Dialogue in "Pride and Prejudice" Jane Austin's "Pride and Prejudice" becomes a reality through dialogue. Some people can not stop the conversation, others spend considerable time saving languages ​​when it is necessary to express emotions. Dialogue of 'pride and prejudice' is different from Shakespeare 's role in theater, characters have long monologues, conversation is more conversational, very witty and clever. There are few people who start a wide range of lectures. And there is no chapter dedicated to explaining every physical characteristic of everyone. Cady Davis Bradshaw ENG 261 Dancing in the dialogue of "pride and prejudice" on October 9, 2014. In "Pride and Prejudice", Elizabeth Bennett and Darcy changed dramatically their attitudes towards each other. Darcy is dedicated to Elizabeth, but she denied this because of its low rank with the family. Elizabeth believes that Darcy is arrogant and interferes. Through the dialogue of these characters, they discovered real concern for each other. - David Hume is a Scottish philosopher living in the 18th century. Hume is now at the turning point of philosophy by infamous skepticism. He insisted that he was a moderate skeptic, but all philosophers later felt the result of his argument. His criticism has influenced various themes that Hume seems to eradicate. One of the themes that Hume attacks against his argument is the concept of individual identity. Dialogue in "Pride and Prejudice" Jane Austin's "Pride and Prejudice" becomes a reality through dialogue. Some people can not stop the conversation, others spend considerable time saving languages ​​when it is necessary to express emotions. Dialogue of 'pride and prejudice' is different from Shakespeare 's role in theater, characters have long monologues, conversation is more conversational, very witty and clever. - Martin Buber's "I and You" provides a philosophy of private dialogue as it explains how personal conversations explain the real features. The theme of this book is that people can explain the outline of life by tending to talk to each other, nature and God. According to Buber, people have two attitudes. Me - you, or me - it. I - you are the subject - the subject relationship, and I - it is the subject - subject matter

Please experience three tricky horror stories to bother your dreams. As a devastation of all supernatural phenomena, Professor Philip Goodman (Andy Niemann) has devoted his life to reveal a false heart and a deceptive supernatural trick of one's television program. But when he received the document from three frightening and unexplainable cases, his doubt was tested: the night watchman (Paul White House) was disturbed while patrolling the abandoned shelter It was. Vision is troubled; avant-garde young man (Black Mirror Alice Lauther) is caught in a prison-like car accident deep inside the forest; and a wealthy former banker (Sherlock Martin's Martin Free) I visited him with a stubborn spirit of his unborn child. What is even more frightening is that all the eerie stories seem to have Professor Goodman's life and evil relationship. Do they believe in him? Ghosts stand out among national stories. Ghost stories are unevenly distributed in every culture, from verbal folk stories to literary works. Ghost stories are often described as terrible, but they are written for various purposes, from comedy to moral story. Ghosts often appear as watchmen or prophets of the future in stories. Ghost beliefs can be found in all cultures around the world, so ghost stories can be delivered in verbal or written form. Rotation of Henry James is a traditional ghost story. Ghost stories can go back to history, some of which dates back to the Victorian era. Victorian people are very interested in ghosts and supernatural phenomena and it is well known to show this appeal by talking about ghosts. - When people discuss Shakespeare's "Henry", Falstaff is often excluded from conversations or considered objects. The conversation has evolved to include Falstaff 's supporters and people who keep him objective. On the other hand, critics like Harrisburg, author of "The Prince's Dog: Falstaff and Speech - The Risk of Prefix" believe that Falstaff's hidden motivation will be revealed only through the character's speech It is. Of course, unless you mention Shirley Jackson's The Haunting of Hill House, you can not complete the discussion about the ghost story. Jackson's story is often admired as "the most terrible" of modern ghost story. We also investigated the relationship between modern belief system and ghost beliefs. In the 1959 novel, four researchers agreed to spend the overnight investigation of entities that had plagued Hill Manor. They bring skepticism and their confidence, they reveal mysteries, but during their stay they themselves will be destroyed by fear A ghost story can simply be a premise of the possibility of believing any novel or drama, including ghosts, or ghosts or characters. "Ghost" may appear automatically, or it may be summoned by magic. What is related to ghosts is the concept of "harassment" where supernatural entities are related to places, things or people. A ghost story is usually an example of a ghost. Ghost stories are often described as terrible, but they are written for various purposes, from comedy to moral story. Ghosts often appear as watchmen or prophets of the future in stories. Ghost beliefs can be found in all cultures around the world, so ghost stories can be delivered in verbal or written form.

Definition of the Two Reasons of David Hume The definition of two reasons in "Humanity" and "Exploration of Human Understanding" by David Hume was the focus of his controversy on the actual view of causality. The majority of the discussion focused on the lack of consistency between the two definitions and the definition as part of the larger text. Regarding the latter objection, Hume points out in the advertisement of the author that the paper "predicted research before leaving the university", so it can be supplemented by asserting the explanation proposed in the survey. He did not announce it. David Hume Hume, David, 1711-76, Scottish philosopher, and historian. Hume brings empiricalism of John Rock and George Berkeley to the logical extremes of fundamental skepticism. He denied the possibility of certain kinds of knowledge and found a series of emotions in his mind and believed that the causal relationship in nature was entirely from B's introduction. The answer to the theme is drawn by the time committee named as illusion by David Hume, and the time committee named human by himself. In the era of modern philosophy, when the influence of Descartes was still important, David Hume brought the argument of killing the Descartes I created and skipping it like a ghost in human perception. You can see not only the theme but also the contrast between Hume and Descartes. Our recognition and memory The famous philosophers David Hume and Rene Descartes are those who are looking for answers and definitions of individual identity. Both of them considered their ideas and issued two different conclusions. Some people think that individual identity can not be understood, but others confirm that their certainty is their thinking and perception. David Hume begins discussing personal identity by denying this It is usually defined in three different ways: material quality, biological and personal identity. In an article by David Hume and John Locke, they studied the meaning of identity with three simple sub theories. Both agreed on specific functions, but the other characteristics were totally different. Are they identified as the same person over time? Hume and Locke wrote a paper on concrete assumptions about identity. The author provides various examples to the reader

Introduction Due to the subprime mortgage crisis in 2007, the US began to experience the financial crisis. Because of this crisis the credit contraction began and spread rapidly from the real state department to other departments and even from the United States to other countries. This caused a series of financial and economic crises such as the collapse of the European real estate market, global equity markets, global financial systems and markets, and many major banks and financial institutions (Sun, et al., 2011 ). This book is one of the reasons for the British 2015 Financial Times book. Author John Kay analyzed the purpose of the financial industry. Why is it necessary? After the financial crisis of 2008, Kayy outlined the complex financial system that led to the accident and helped the reader understand that there has been little change in nine years since the great recession. This is a thorough but familiar and important work. In the global financial crisis, a new paper on journalism research focused on mainstream newspapers in the United States, the UK and Australia during the 2008 global financial crisis. According to the newspaper, mainstream financial media "generally do not give warnings, lack sufficient skepticism when reporting financial and economic trends, journalists are too close to the information sources used to obtain information ". Poverty, a study by Media & Jornalismo published at the Media and Journalism Research Center at the University of Coimbra in Portugal, reported that Western news media frequently reports poverty performance such as famine, overcrowding and natural disasters, but "poverty is" Issue ", the reporter says as follows. This global economy has been affected by the recent economic crisis mainly due to the deteriorating financial situation since September 2008. The economic situation in Latin America was concentrated in the second quarter of 2008. The cause of the financial crisis is the decrease in overseas remittances in Latin America 2. Amid this recession, the percentage and the international trade ratio also declined to 2-3%. Due to the economic downturn, most countries driven by trade are hindered. The decline in the price of exported goods including the commodity price of the exporting industry also caused the financial crisis in recent years, which has led to a decline in the GDP rate. However, export earnings sharply declined due to economic shocks. An unstable exchange rate and a rise in yield also caused the collapse of the stock market (Ocampo: 2009). Morgan (2009) judged that the possibility of the global financial crisis is small

The realistic view of international political economics on May 2, 2001 can be seen in the international trade policy of the United States and China. As a mature world power country, the United States will further strengthen its international role through trade with other countries (ie China), reflecting the realist idea of ​​the country, which occupies the central position of the political situation of the world I am doing. The willingness of the United States to participate in the world market shows the concept of domestic interests, which reminds European countries of many of the policies according to the era of monarchy. It is very interesting for me to get out of this Yin and see the breathing - breathing process and what it is. It has many names, and I am convinced: passion and pragmatism, idealism and skepticism, innocence and realityism, openingness and closure, freedom and conservatism. I notice that I am confused with people who have found themselves dedicated to life - those are their lives, not my life. I think it is clear that my pendulum keeps swinging for the time being. I do not think that we can keep balance from the beginning. I think that it is necessary to witness these extreme situations and feel truly all kinds of experiences. In those days it was neither hot nor cold, I could not get any profit from the model. Instead, it makes sense to identify the mode in which you are, the advantages and disadvantages of that mode, and the ability to switch modes as needed. International relations are tricky at best, the worst thing is misery. Innocent mistakes caused by cultural differences can have unintended consequences. In the discussion between liberalism and realism, I sit on the left side. I think that people should be more important than money I think that America needs to be aware of the world society and be involved in it. I define myself as a liberal, but for me, generally I pay more attention to human rights, human potential, international cooperation, and fair society, not my economic interests about it. The government thinks that it is not an opponent nor an oppressor but a partner, but in reality it is necessary to provide services that citizens and the private sector can not provide themselves.

"I do not know if there is a god, I do not know if the universe already exists forever." He believes that he can not know anything. If the assumption that "there is a beginning" is confirmed, the assertion that "things have not begun" is rebutted and the claim that "I do not know if it began" is proved wrong. Atheist atheism includes the philosophy of atheism and agnosticism. Because of the difference in definition, agnostic atheists do not believe in God or God and are established by extension: "God's existence and absence is now unknown, may not know absolutely" Or its knowledge is irrelevant or unimportant, or "abandonment of the existence and absence of God's knowledge is optimal." Strong atheism is a philosophical position that God does not exist. It is a clear form of atheism, which means that it consciously rejects theology. Some powerful atheists also insist that the existence of any gods is logically impossible. It is also known as positive atheism, strong atheism, Gnostic atheism Atheistic atheism is a philosophical position including atheism and agnosticism. Atheist atheists are atheists. Because they do not believe in the existence of God, they are agnostic. Because they insist that the existence of God is in principle unknown or actually unknown. If you can not find a reason to believe that a person is God, he should not believe that God is perfectly natural and reasonable; if so, he is an atheist. Evidence Based on Human Judgment If he finally concludes that he can progress further, investigate the essence and extent of human knowledge, and that God can not prove it, he will be sure that it is true He can not believe it because he can not know. It is also an atheist, an agnostic - an atheist - an atheist, because he is an agnostic. " Strong atheism is a logically defective position. Weak atheism, agnosticism and skepticism are theological positions "I do not know". Weak atheism agrees with the atheistic premise. Please check that theologians are the only ones claiming to know anything. What do they know? Finally, what you believe is not important. Important is the truth. You may not believe in gravity. But if you leave a skyscraper, you will work on the ground. Carefulness will allow us to do a thorough investigation of all available data before we take care of all our belief systems for our eternity. "How can I know that something is true?" "What is my source of information?" "Is my source absolutely reliable?" "What if I am wrong? Is it? "

Modernism and postmodernism Have you ever thought about the difference between modernism and postmodernism? It seems easy to explain in words what they are and how they are usually related. But it is actually quite different from yours. Modernism is a movement of visual art, music, literature and drama, rejecting how to make art of Victorian era, consumption method, and what it means. Modernist hopes that everything is an absolute truth. In this article, we explain the direct relationship between modernism and postmodern in various temporal and spatial contexts, and the similarities between postmodern and modern world. However, the complexity of postmodern world is not over yet. For me, that is just the beginning. Looking forward to finding some relationship, I will release them as soon as possible! thank you for reading Modernism and postmodernism Have you ever thought about the difference between modernism and postmodernism? It seems easy to explain in words what they are and how they are usually related. But it is actually quite different from yours. Modernism is a movement of visual art, music, literature and drama, rejecting how to make art of Victorian era, consumption method, and what it means. Modernism wants absolute truth Paul Land's modernism theme 1 Fabrizia Corsi Critical and cultural research Dawn Correia (23 April 2013). Nd. Modernism, in its broad interpretation, includes various movements related to European art from the late nineteenth century to the early twentieth century (Design History Mashup, Philip S., 2008). These latest European sports were sent Postmodern is a very difficult concept to define. A French philosopher defined Postmodernism as "a suspect of all metanarathies", but this basically means skepticism about all claims of absolute truth. The elements and techniques used by postmodern authors raise doubts about their reading experiences and motivate readers to examine their own understanding of life and social value. - Hundred Years of Solitude - Magical Realism Centuries-old lonely magical realism is a literary form of strange, grotesque and dreamlike stories related, as the events are common. Magical realism is the opposite of the "one at a time" story style, and the writer emphasizes the wonderful quality of imaginary events. In a world of magical realism, the narrator talks about surrealism, so that of course it will be a reality

When reading The Whitsun Wedding Philip Larkin 's "The Whitsun Weddings" at Philip Larkin, I was initially shocked by the difference in language used by many of the poets that we read on his course . The difference between the two WB language The Yeats and Lajin poet we wrote earlier are particularly eye-catching. Of course the use of the language changed slowly, and all the poets we read between Yeats and Larkin are as few as the former, like the latter. Whitsun Wedding, Philip Larkin - HM. Whitsun Weddings is the best collection of Philip Larkin, not The Less Decived but will be saved in future browsing lists: Philip Larkin's Really Good Books. The Pentecostal wedding is better than any poet except Philippe Platinum. Many of Philip Prakin 's "Pentecostal Wedding" poems are disillusioned, solitary, and the theme of passage of time. But in this series, the element common to most of his work is Lajin 'seemingly inconsistent attitude towards women. In many of these poems, Larkin sees women as "insignificant", but his description of these women shows that they are actually showing their desirability and strength, especially for men There is sufficient evidence. In The Whitsun Weddings, Philip Larkin presented the reader a ruthless explanation of the British life after the Second World War. Larkin is an outstanding writer of sports and the Pentecostal wedding is a collection of skepticism about Harold Macmillan 's "consumer culture" in the UK. This series thoroughly explores the shortness of human life, the negligence of social expectation, and the negligence of consumerism. In "Dockery and Son", a middle-aged main character was shown to the reader, while reviewing his alma mater, "I lived at the door: / lock" was about to be opened. A locked door means a discontinuance that is impossible and a disconnection that he feels as a life before the student. The use of Larkin 's gift helps to emphasize the break between the hero and his past. The short-term nature of human life is totally opposite to the eternal nature of the hero's world.

One of the main challenges facing the earth is global warming. Global warming is a phenomenon in which, in addition to a slow temperature rise due to high levels of fossil fuels such as carbon dioxide, forest cutting (reduction of forest trees) is placed in the atmosphere of the earth with the sun's radiant heat is. It is also known as the greenhouse effect as it adversely affects our environment. In order to solve this problem, it is necessary to take actions that use recyclable and inexhaustible resources such as wind, sun, and water to take actions that are "environmentally friendly". In the United States, global warming is often a partisan political issue. Republicans tend to oppose actions that they believe are unproven threats and Democrats support actions that they believe will reduce global warming and its impact by controlling greenhouse gas emissions There is a tendency. Climatologist Kevin E. Trenberth stated that: SPM has been approved by the government. The argument here is that scientists decide what they can say, but the government will decide how to say it best. We negotiate through wording to ensure accuracy, balance, clarity of information, and relevance and relevance to policy. The IPCC process depends on the intention of creating participants' balanced evaluations. However, in Shanghai, some people, especially Saudi Arabia, are trying to slow down and even potentially confuse the information in the report. In the 1980s, under the guidance of President Ronald Reagan, anti-environmentalismists learned that aggressive attacks on the law could oppose strong public opposition and increase the public's support for environmental problems It was. In the fight against global warming regulations, the opponents decided to challenge not only the proposed government rules, but also the definition of problems to be solved. In response to its discovery and discussion, the scientific basis for the beliefs of opponents to global warming caused by humans has caused "environmental skepticism". The refusal coordinator shifted from a question about the survey result to a full-scale attack on climate science. These agencies are aware of evidence of global warming against scientific peer review and attacks by agencies such as the National Academy of Sciences. In the past quarter century, the majority of network participants have cooperated.

In many cases there are situations of recognized versions and real versions of the situation. Usually, these two versions differ in some way. Some people can understand honestly, but most people can not see the truth of the situation. Instead, they see an incorrect representation of the exact situation. George Orwell's "Very Happy", "Juilliard Shaw's Super American", and Roland Easley's "Time Murderer" show that the truth of the situation is obscured by the appearance. Reality and reality themes in Shakespeare's 'Hamlet' are revealed through misunderstanding of character, dangerous appearance, and misunderstanding of relationship. Personal misunderstandings appear in situations where people seem to have certain personality traits, but they are not. The misunderstanding of these personality is the appearance of the theme and an excellent expression of reality. The use of dangerous outer walls also greatly contributes to the appearance and reality theme. This shows on the betrayal of a certain character that other characters do not know. The last important factor in the development of this theme is the misunderstanding of the relationship. The relationship between various people is misunderstood many times in the whole drama. Many relationships seem to be somehow somewhat, but in reality it is not. Therefore, Shakespeare's "Hamlet" really proves this. Please help me with this work. "MLM of appearance and reality," William Shakespeare's "Hamlet" in "Hamlet" has revealed a consistent theme of apparent and reality in the overall role behavior. In many cases, but it seems so that there is sincerity and honesty, in fact, dishonesty and deception is usually the true intentions of personality. Specifically, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern, Hamlet and Claudius proved a discontinuity between appearance and reality. In the play, these characters The appearance of "Hamlet" is one of the central themes of Shakespeare's "Hamlet". The role of role in the play is the role of the hidden character - in fact the murderer and looter Claudius plays a role of sad brother and legitimate king, in her son's view Gertrude's Adultery plays a role she is the "most harmful woman" who plays the role of "the most beautiful queen". Even Hamlet himself played a crazy role in his attempt. Philosophical problems in Bertrand Russell's "appearance and reality" The approach to his subject in Bertrand Russell's "philosophical problems" involves Descartes' fundamental skepticism, in which the author cancels all previous assumptions It was. Certain reality and existence. In the first chapter, Russell 's quest for reality in reality compared to reality starts with observation of his surroundings. For example, I checked the form and he confirmed it

The aim of this task is to create research papers on philosophy, and explain how it works in ancient Greece. I have to explain the Iberian philosopher I appointed and I have to discuss his view on the government and his teachings to the ancient Greeks. The important question is to write an organized article that contains multiple sources accurately. I need to get two physical sources and at least one source from the internet. In each reference, I must interpret or interpret the bibliography and show clarity. In Greek Athens, one of the famous philosophers of 200 BC epicurus, there is a big question that people can not answer, "How do you get happiness", then Epicurus will ask everyone in Athens from time to time . First of all, some people said they would have sex with six virgins, but in epic they use "human relations" to define it as a goal of happiness. Epicuras is looking at it from another perspective Many people have a very nervous life relationship. Aristotle and epiculus seem to have the same ultimate goal, but there are different ways to achieve the goal. They believe that everyone's actions are directed to human prosperity and happiness, but Epicurean also exchanges happiness and happiness. They achieved their goals in different ways, and in this respect they are very different. Epicurus and Aristotle may agree with the problem, but when it becomes the universe, they are dotted in the sky or sky space. They have many different ideas to separate them, but they end up in good faith for human beings. For example, epicros is misunderstood and Aristotle is well known, so it is easy to understand in most cases why so many people reject hedonistic philosophy. Epicuras established epicurenism. Epicurus is based on his hedonistic philosophy - the only benefit in life is happiness. However, Epicuras teaches that not all fun is good. Extreme happiness can lead to pain, so the only benefit is peace and calm happiness. Epicuras said that the highest pleasure is two freedom from physical health and peace of mind, pain. Skepticism is a philosophy school founded by Ellis Pillow, as well as the prosperity of Stow's philosophy and epicureanism. Pyrrho taught us not to know anything. He said that our sense deceives us and does not have the exact way to understand things. Therefore, all requirements on knowledge are wrong. We do not know anything, so in this way we should treat everything indifferently and not make judgments.

Summary of Evolutionary Ethics: Michael Ruth believes that evolutionary ethics compromises objectivity and the foundation of ethics. However, Ruse must use suspicious assumptions to derive his conclusion. These assumptions can be traced back to G. E. Moore. In addition, part of the Ruse case on the moral foundation can support the objectivity and foundation of morality. Collaborative activities for human prosperity will help to show the way to natural moral realism as well as the moral skepticism conceived by Rousse. Evolution theory is an exploration field that explores how evolution theory influences understanding of ethics and morals. The scope of problems in evolutionary ethics research is very broad. Advocates of evolutionary ethics argue that it is very important in the field of descriptive ethics, norm ethics and meta ethics. Descriptive evolutionary ethics includes biological methods based on so-called evolutionary ethics, which shape human psychology and behavior. These methods are based on scientific fields such as evolutionary psychology, social biology, behavioral science, etc. and try to explain the moral behavior, ability, and tendency of a specific human being by evolutionary terms. For example, it is almost universally believed that incest incest is morally wrong and may be interpreted as evolutionary adaptation to promote human survival. Normative evolutionary ethics is the most controversial field of evolutionary ethics. Normative evolutionary ethics is aimed at using evolutionary terms to define which behavior is correct or incorrect, which is good or bad. It is not merely an explanation but a goal, value, obligation. The above social Darwinism is the most influential version of normative evolutionary ethics in history. As mentioned by philosopher GE E Moore, many early versions of normative evolutionary ethics seem to have committed a logical mistake, a mistake called Moore as naturalism. This is a mistake in defining normative properties (such as goodwill) for non-normative naturalistic properties (happiness, survival, etc.).

This is an interlude between the conspiracy theory and the mystery host of unknown cause. Listen to the second part of AD FREE immediately after this episode with "unexplained mystery of unknown cause" Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 has disappeared from the sky on a flight within 1 hour of flight. Despite the existence of all geographical information technology and the search and recovery work of more than $ 160 million, the disappearance of flight MH 370 and the flight to the sky over the Indian Ocean of 2014 remains a mystery. Everyone likes a good conspiracy theory. Because of these theories, the Internet is a golden enclosure, and we treat them as special foods on weekdays. I have heard about persuasive conspiracy theory, but there is nothing ranked first like Redditor YeremyV. I forgot to connect JonBenétRamsey and Katy Perry - I am talking about the real reason. In Pinocchio, we see a title character going to the pleasure island, and the kids can do anything they want. This is obviously a bad idea, as we have a group of young people who smoke cigars and drink beer. Because all bad behavior (at least in Disney movies) has an impact, boys will be silent and sold to salt mine workers. However, there is one exception. If you are still talking, it will not be sold. I wrote psychology about conspiracy theory before, but I would like to clarify important points. Psychologists studying conspiracy theory will not study whether certain conspiracy theories are true. Instead, we are interested in the social and psychological nature of the broad conspiracy concept. Furthermore, assuming that these types of investigations suggest that someone is plotting against you, this is incorrect. This is not what this series of research shows. It is clear that humans and government collide in the whole history of mankind. Healthy skepticism is the center of scientific effort. However, the essence of conspiracy theory has some fundamental danger and unscientific things. There are two reasons why this may be problematic: The conspiracy theory in the open palm can be a healthy way for people to review power. Many of what have been called conspiracy theories, such as the secret dollar agreement between the United States and Saudi Arabia quoted at the beginning of this article, are now known as conspiracy facts. However, unlike its cynicism about all power structure in the United States, the Russian government asserts the overthrow of the CIA as a model of lies, torture and government truth and virtue, helping to tilt the Democratic primary Cooperate with corporate loyalists. Their theory does not scrutinize power; it protected it. They intentionally did not have their conspiracy theory, but changed it to a mad, noncritical cult. As one reader says, they are comets off the heavenly gate.

The area 51 military base is one of the most controversial places in the United States. The controversy extends from UFOs to foreigners who witnessed highly advanced military technology. Recently, the CIA unlocked several documents and allowed the presence and development of spy machines, but denied any vision (or experiment) by UFOs or aliens. However, there are still many people who believe in UFOs and alien conspiracy, and they think that the CIA is not completely honest. UFO: This term is often used for all reported scenes of unidentified objects in the sky, most of which have been proven to be natural phenomena (eg Venus) or artificial aircraft (eg balloon). More specifically, the term UFO refers to a "flying saucer" or other alien spaceship which is said to be visually visual. The belief in UFOs may be between innocent speculations that alien creatures have visited the Earth, or it may be a so-called presence of foreigners and a quasi-religious input to aliens' doctrine I do not. These creatures are often seen as insignificant (spiritual) entities that communicate with contacts through telepathy (spiritual). Their message actually violates the Bible's faith. One of the complaints often raised by UFO as skepticism of objective physical phenomena is the way to study the nature of UFO data and UFO. These complaints are based on specific scientific views and their data and do not necessarily apply to phenomena like UFOs. This does not mean that UFO is not suitable for scientific research. That simply means that the way you work in one area of ​​science does not fit in another. [R The sight of most unidentified flying objects and UFOs can easily be interpreted as a ground plane known as an astronomical object or a naughty sight. Nonetheless, a small percentage of the public believes that UFOs may actually be the origin of aliens. So far, SETI's plan to detect obstacles in smart radio signals after decades of effort has at least partially weakened general optimism at the beginning of the space era. Nonetheless, there is still a belief in alien creatures in pseudoscience, conspiracy theory, and folklore, especially "51 District" and the legends. It has become a popular culture and has not received such a serious treatment in popular entertainment.

Introduction: Conflict, Optimism and Skepticism Over the past 55 years, the conflict between Israel and the Palestinians has brought about three wars, many years of terrorism, and decades of poverty and evacuation, tens of thousands of people in both countries . In spite of the death conflict, Israel benefited from generous foreign aid and developed the economy. But the Palestinians are under the rule of a corrupt government and are afraid of the power of Israel living mainly in poverty. My central argument is that Israel's terrorism is far more serious than Palestinian terrorism, especially contrary to Israeli standard myths. This mythical refutation is important for a variety of reasons. First of all, of course, it is very important to determine the historical fact itself. Second, the truth may make Israeli people not blinded to their actions and hence may not be obstinate in seeking a compromise to solve their conflict with the Palestinians. In particular, the facts should clearly indicate that Israel has no moral legitimacy or national interest and refuses to negotiate with Palestinian organizations using terrorism, especially Hamas. It is a problem. Palestinian conflict Palestinian efforts to present the existence of Israel as a major cause of disputes within the territory ignore history. Palestinian terrorism takes precedence over the territorial rule by Israel (even the existence of the Israeli state itself). The Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) was founded in 1964 three years ago when Israel started its existence within its territory. In addition, Palestinian terrorism peaks at the time of the recent negotiated settlement in both the peak time of the Oslo process in the mid-1990s and in Israel's unprecedented peace offer in Camp David and Taba in 2000 There were many cases.

Gentleman, I do not doubt that you will think seriously about me. "This reminds us of the first important concept of making us think about enlightenment, we tend to think of enlightenment as all-or-nothing, some people will understand or some will not understand I consider relative enlightenment, for example if all or not is correct, do not understand, so please do not speak today Today 's all - or - nothing method is correct, which is a serious methodology It may be the above problem, but it may be enlightened like sex.Madness behavior - What happened when you actually experienced sexual behavior! Ours about enlightenment Is everything like a group of virgins of children who are speculating sexual intercourse? Okay, men and girls, ready to enlightenment In this lesson I will introduce enlightenment. what is that? Enlightenment, also known as the age of enlightenment, was an intellectual movement from the late 17th century to the early 18th century, emphasizing reasons, individualism, and skepticism. Enlightenment challenged the traditional religious view. Because that was such a wide movement, enlightenment did not have an accurate start date. It did not pop up, but it gradually developed. Most historians came to the beginning of enlightenment from the middle of the 17th century to the beginning of the 18th century. The work of intellectuals like Rene Descartes, Barus Spinoza, Isaac Newton is particularly important for enlightenment. In particular, British enlightenment depends on the merit of Sir Isaac Newton whose "principle" shocked the world. His Opticks provided a perfect image of their intelligent enlightenment plan to enlightened thinkers by revealing the nature of the light. As Pope Alexander said, Voltaire is so admiring Newton that his mistress is "Venus - Newton." Newton's physics promises to unleash all the secrets of nature using just reason - do not forget that Newton believes in revelation and reason and writes many comments about the Bible.

Magic is regarded as religion and lifestyle, and it has greatly developed in the era of Europe and history and has great influence on art. History of magic can be traced back to ancient Celtic and Druids who were originally religions based on nature and people respected the elements of animals and vegetables they eat (the beginning of magic) . The word "witch" is translated into the word "Kashaf" in Hebrew. This comes from the fundamental meaning of "Linger" (Linder). Magic is a spiritual belief system and a way to live. Shakespeare and Montaigne ... When writing "Hamlet" it is said that Shakespeare was influenced by French essayist Michael de Montaigne. The paper on Moral philosophy of Montagne may have formed many sentences in Hamlet, including Hamlet's most famous monologue. Especially since Hamlet tends to be delayed, is Montaigne the reason why the first half and the second half of the drama differ greatly? Read more about Shakespeare, Montaigne, Hamlet There is not much intimacy between Shakespeare's work and Devil and Bacon's works, only Marloe's tangent. (Marlowe, the influence of Shakespeare may be related to Shakespearean plays in Henry VI play, but it is surpassed by the author's mature work.) Candidates are compared. The study found that Shakespeare's work reveals a unique and substantial sound that can not be composed by other writers. This confirms that William Shakespeare is a broader academic view of the Shakespeare playwright and that the author's skepticism is ultimately the marginal belief of scholars. William Shakespeare 's Othello is one of many plays that captured Shakespeare' s wonderful sentences. Like most of Shakespeare's play Othello, it is a tragic story about how the noble warrior named Othello went from the height of his life to the bottom of his life. Every character in this story, especially the enemy named Iago, plays an important role in the outcome of that story. - In William Shakespeare play 'Othello' (1603), love and hatred are the two most important and widespread themes expressed through the play. They are married because there is no doubt that Othello likes to enjoy Desdemona in the first part of the theater. As the drama progressed, the drama villain, Iaquin, manipulated Othello by winning trust and injecting him with poisonous seeds of hatred and jealousy.

The views expressed by Michel Montaigne's "self-feeding" nature and technology in Michel Montaigne's "cannibalism" are still very effective in today's society. As you say, "the more you have, the more you desire", technology makes life easier. We are a fast-paced society and we are not thinking much about the world around us. Not only did we not notice the beauty of nature, we started to destroy nature without thinking. I live in a society that does not pay much attention to natural and wonderful works. Michel de Montaigne's article "Cannibals", Michel de Montaigne said: "According to our criteria, this is truly barbarian, as they describe the Brazilians in the article" Cannibals "in the 1580 article I have to do this completely or we have to do so There is a remarkable distance between their roles and our character "(158). - Descartes' free will to think the first philosophy In my first philosophical thinking, Descartes led the reader to practice methodology in philosophical exploration. After robbing all the wisdom of doubt and false beliefs, he reexamined the nature and structure of existence and tried to universally obtain a valid epistemology without skepticism. A cannibal is an article that is one of the collections of essays collected by Michel de Montaigne, describing the ritual of Pininaba in Brazil. In particular, he reported how the organization respected and eaten the enemy 's dead bodies. In his work, he uses cultural relativism to compare European "savage" of the 16th century with cannibalism. Michelle Echem de Montagne, commonly known as Michel de Montagne, was born on February 28, 1533 in Montagne Castle (near Bordeaux, France). Montagne 's wealthy father, Pierre Ekemed Montagne decided to cultivate his son' s intellectual development with Latin as the first language. Montagne did not learn French until 6 years old. His father's death also meant that Montagne inherited family estate. In 1571, Montagne retreated to his castle and protected himself from public daily life. He also began writing personal and subjective thinking about topics such as religion, education, friendship, love, and freedom. Montagne called his original work Essa. He developed a new literary genre: articles

That is the idea of ​​the Spinnock style of Descartes' judgment. Abstract; Some of Spinoza's critics believe that the idea of ​​Spinonozia is a judgment. As Spinoza is interpreted as responding to Descartes' ideological theory, he considers Spinosian thought to be a Cartesian judgment rather than Cartesian thought, so I call this view a common interpretation. The most obvious difference between Descartes and Spinoza is that descartes considers thinking passive, but Spinoza thinks the opposite is true. A: For clarity, I have never mentioned Descartes linguistics I did. Cover It is related to Descartes (and sometimes influenced by it), but it is often proposed by Descartes critics. Strictly speaking, there is no Cartesian linguistics. As discussed in CL, although the use of the term "concept" of Descartes is not entirely clear, he seems to be using it extensively, so the language expression usually consists of individual It is not a concept but an idea. It is within range. If so, then the language will belong to the concept of his natural tendency - and it is difficult to see how the attributes he mentioned in his language reference are obtained. I want to know what Descartes meant when I talked about his important introduction. As background, I discovered an important part of the Cartesian heritage; Descartes doubts - casts doubt on everything you know. In today's world, this idea seems to be very old-fashioned. We tend to question everything up to the point of skepticism. For Descartes, doubt is the opposite of reason. Descartes' suspicion has made scientific progress possible over the past 200 years. The medieval society believed that humans existed because God wants them to exist. Descartes does not doubt the existence of God, I doubt that the existence of man is God's desire. He has a problem because he proved the existence of God using a series of theorems. He proved that thought is the essence of thinking Discussions in Spinosian language are related to God rather than humans, but the discussion of Descartes is related to humans from Spinoza's point of view. From there build and summarize most of his evidence. Descartes' view on will and intelligence is supported by very reasonable evidence, "I think this is something like". When the will is limited to understanding, I think that Spinoza appears and confidently and clearly confident that things are definite until destroying it with his will, wisdom and essential deductive conclusion I will. I now believe that there are substances with infinite attributes. Each represents an eternal essence.

Appearance and reality In the first chapter, Bertrand Russell basically wants to understand the real meaning of "reality". The truth is that "reality" can not be truly determined. There is a difference between believing and actual knowledge. For example, I know that the table in front of the classroom is genuine. I know this. Because all my feelings are in agreement. Well, problems arise when trying to determine the color, texture, and even the shape of the table. As in the example in this article, the color of the table will change depending on the amount of light above the table. Please help me with this work. "The appearance and reality of MLM" in "Hamlet" William · Shakespeare's "Hamlet" reveals a consistent theme of appearance and reality in overall role behavior. In many cases, since honesty and integrity seems to exist, in reality, dishonesty and deception are usually the true intent of character. Specifically, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern, Hamlet and Claudius proved a discontinuity between appearance and reality. In the play, these characters The appearance of "Hamlet" is one of the central themes of Shakespeare's "Hamlet". The role of role in the play is the role of the hidden character - in fact the murderer and looter Claudius plays a role of sad brother and legitimate king, in her son's view Gertrude's Adultery plays a role she is the "most harmful woman" who plays the role of "the most beautiful queen". Even Hamlet himself played a crazy role in his attempt. Philosophical problems in Bertrand Russell's "appearance and reality" The approach to his subject in Bertrand Russell's "philosophical problems" involves Descartes' fundamental skepticism, in which the author cancels all previous assumptions It was. Certain reality and existence. In the first chapter, Russell 's quest for reality in reality compared to reality starts with observation of his surroundings. For example, I checked the form and he confirmed it The appearance and reality of Peter Shaffer's Amadeus in the 18th century world are all appearance and appearance often compete with reality. This is the case of Amadeus Peter Shafer, following the music career of Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart. Mozart 's career was surrounded by fraud and falsehood due to poor choice when he was always destroyed by Salieri. When Mozart arrived in Vienna Antonio Salieri pretended to welcome in real life, we should not judge them based solely on their appearance. There are many people who seem to be reliable, but they are not. Appearance and reality are important themes of William Shakespeare's Macbeth. The subject focuses on the tragic result of such mistakes in personality and judgment fooled by seemingly authentic people. These characters include Duncan exorcising Macbeth, Witch and Macbeth of her own tricks, Macbeth.

En · Light · Ened · Ly · Adverben · Light · Ened · Noun · Light · Ener, Nounen · Light · Enningly, Adverbnon · En · Light · Ened, Adjectivenon · En · Light · en · Ing, Adjective · Light · en, Verb (for objects) pre · en · light · en, verb, noun · en · light · en, verb (for objects) unen en · light · ened, adjective · en · light · en · ing, adjective well · en · light · ened, adjective Okay, men and girls, ready to enlightenment In this lesson I will introduce enlightenment. what is that? Enlightenment, also known as the age of enlightenment, was an intellectual movement from the late 17th century to the early 18th century, emphasizing reasons, individualism, and skepticism. Enlightenment challenged the traditional religious view. Because that was such a wide movement, enlightenment did not have an accurate start date. It did not pop up, but it gradually developed. Most historians came to the beginning of enlightenment from the middle of the 17th century to the beginning of the 18th century. The work of intellectuals like Rene Descartes, Barus Spinoza, Isaac Newton is particularly important for enlightenment. In particular, British enlightenment depends on the merit of Sir Isaac Newton whose "principle" shocked the world. His Opticks provided a perfect image of their intelligent enlightenment plan to enlightened thinkers by revealing the nature of the light. As Pope Alexander said, Voltaire is so admiring Newton that his mistress is "Venus - Newton." Newton's physics promises to unleash all the secrets of nature using just reason - do not forget that Newton believes in revelation and reason and writes many comments about the Bible. Enlightenment (also known as the age of enlightenment and reason; French: "century of light" leSiècledes Lumières; and German: "enlightenment" Aufklärung) is an intellectual and philosophical movement of the 18th century and is Europe . The world of thought dominates. Enlightenment included a series of ideas that used rationality as the main source of authority and justification, ideas such as freedom, progress, tolerance, fraternity, constitutionalism, and separation of church and state were proposed. In France, the central principle of lesLumières is personal freedom and religious tolerance to the monarchy and the absolute principle of the Roman Catholic Church. Enlightenment is characterized by emphasizing scientific methods and simplification, and more questions about religious legitimacy - this attitude is captured by Sapere aude.

Standardized testing improves the quality of public education. Over the years, they have gotten used to judging academic performance and assessing the needs of students. Illiteracy graduation is no longer a high school graduate. Teachers can no longer pass students from one grade to another grade without teaching the students anything (spelling). While these advances are beneficial, standardized tests tend to harm schools that are already at a disadvantage, prompting the state to lower their education, and the schools are more likely to be in the exam itself than the students' actual learning I will have an interest. Standardized tests have been part of American education since the 19th century, but broad trust in standardization is mainly the phenomenon of the 20th century. For example, the University Entrance Examination Committee did not start a standardized test on higher education until 1900. The University Entry Examination Committee was founded in 1901. The first screening was conducted nationwide, and a total of nine subjects were covered. This test was conducted to increase the number of standardized entrants to excellent colleges in the northeastern United States. Initially, the test was also applied to the top boarding school to standardize the course. A test of Army Alpha and Beta developed by Robert Yerkes and colleagues that began in World War I. Prior to this, immigrants in the mid - 19th century promoted the development of standardized tests in the United States. Standardized tests were introduced to Europe through the early 19th century Putonghua test Through the defense of the British colonial rulers, the most "sustainable" was the British consul of Thomas Taylor Meadows in Guangzhou. Meadows warned about the collapse of the British Empire if standardized tests were not implemented immediately in the empire as a whole. Prior to adoption, standardization tests were traditionally not part of Western pedagogy; based on skepticism of ancient Greece and open discussion, Western scholars have published papers written by students for non-standardized assessment The use of. For this reason, the first European standardization test was conducted in British India, not in Europe. Standard testing is a test that is managed and graded in a given standard way. There are many purposes and reasons for standardized testing, so that everyone affected must fully understand it. Standardized tests allow schools to compare student achievements, ensure teacher's responsibility, and provide instruction to educators. These important reasons indicate why standardized testing is one of the most important topics of education.

In The Pathos of Failure, Thomas Elsaesser explains the emergence of new ideology in American filmmaking, reflecting the resolution of "confidence in storytelling" (280) and the resolution of target-oriented characters psychologically related It is. He stated that these motivated personality "prevented the affirmation of the story - result model [gradually replacing it with another person whose shape was not gradually revealed"] (281). Christian Keithley outlines this form in more detail by "traps the image of affection", he believes that changes in cultural attitudes lead to skepticism about the utility of actions. ) However, Gilmore believes that this is "two wonderful films in America, a mixture of western and black movies", reflecting both aspects of the American spirit. "The country of the elderly," Coens combines these two types into a movie, but this is a tragic and existential, endless black in the movie. According to Richard Gilmore, the hero stays among the inevitable emotions, "The world is moving forward, not related to human desires and concerns", and our future can not be separated. . Our past behavior Some critics think that black movies are genres. It will rely on clearly defined rules and expectation systems like other types of movies. For example, it is Western or musical. Calling black movies like types like Flippo and Naremore, Hirsch has many problems. First, the genre tends to straddle the times rather than being bound to them, and in the 1940's black movies are closely related to Hollywood. This particular criticism of black as a type depends on whether recent movies are regarded as a continuation of the black tradition. In addition, black movies tend to cross traditional type boundaries (Hirsch 5). There are western movies, gang movies, comedy movies. Obviously, the black manufacturer did not intentionally start making black. The criticism of using a black movie as a type is that it does not include all movies that are considered black.

As I was born and raised as a Christian family, people may think that there is no choice but to become a Christian. Certainly, as I acknowledged being my daughter of biological parents, I accepted the fact that I was sent to the world as his beloved daughter and disciple. My parents serving God like other missionaries, and living in a spiritual and healthy environment is too easy for me to become a Christian. But my special guidance and my unwavering obedience to those who become truly faithful Christians. After receiving secularism and sound skepticism, I chose the path of agnosticism. The rise of Christian fundamentalism deprived Christian poetic expression. It became useless for me. Then the opportunity relationship introduced me to Tao Te Ching. This philosophical poetical head rarely talks about God, but it shows a way to a more comfortable life. Twenty years later I was able to communicate with the romantic future with OKCupid. We were able to break through our fourth bar of online dating that we were quite interesting and oddly. Send a message instead of flashing far away But ... I chose this. Of course, if I get married, I can get a job. But my romantic Christian says, "Is this not going to get married for the wrong reason, can not you hurry? Then my brain explodes and I will not further develop this As a result, I am extremely irritated, isolated and unable to contact anything that needs to be satisfied.There is a tenant, but this is not a solitary position in a foreign country.I am a friend of mine I tried to do, but these things never gave me responsible emotions deeply rooted in me.

In our luxury life, it often does not take time to get back to the real characteristics of the people around us and gain insight. Instead, we hope to make decisions that are not supported about people and continue to focus on our own problems. Mr. W. Somerset · Morm wrote a story called Mr. Knowle and tells us that we tend to judge others often, but then when we stop and look closely, they really Character is superior to us. The beginning of the story is that the narrator expressed his dislike for this role. W Somerset Maugham was born at the British Embassy in Paris on 25th January 1874, known as W. Somerset Maugham William Somerset Maugham CH is a British playwright, novelist, short story writer. TheQuoteDiary.com was one of the most popular writers at the time and was said to be the most highly-skilled writer in the 1930s. We are looking for the most popular writers and their famous quotes. TheQuoteDiary has more than 400 famous writers and their quotes. You can find quotes from your favorite authors here. W Somerset Maugham Quotes 47 I W. SOMERSET MAUGHAM W. Somerset Magham (). British novelist, short story writer, playwright. Morgam was trained by a doctor at St. Thomas Hospital in London (John Keats received training 75 years ago). Based on the life of Paul Gauguin, he writes over 60 books including autobiographical novel "Human Shackles" (1915), Moon and Six Pence (1919), overview (1938), and author's note (1949) writing. Year), a series of personal memories reflecting his skepticism and the philosophy of his life. From the summary, I have not known a way to better train writers, not medical professionals for many years. I think that you can learn much about human nature at law firms; but in general, you must fully manage your transactions with men. Furthermore, the advantages he deals with are usually very important. He is looking at humanity from a professional point of view. The doctor is very cautious It is new. Fixed and extended the story of the third edition. Poetry ESSA Y S by RICHARD REYNOLDS, M. D. and Johnstone, M. D. Edit Among all identified physicians, W. Somerset / Morm must be considered the most productive and successful. He acquired his medical degree in 1897, but he never worked in medicine, but he was also a creative writer. In his nearly 70 years of career, he created more than 20 novels and even more scripts. People remember serious works such as 'bondage of humans' and 'rim of razor', but the indomitable Morgam also includes nine very interesting stories including "fact of life" and "three" 90 short stories have been created fat women "(4)

Passing through the bar is more than mere feathers on the gypsum board - it is perseverance, ambition, proof of nosebleed for 4 years. Here are reasons why lawyers are exceptional for our law school students. Past generalist lawyers and experts in various legal areas are considered to be even more. Recently, however, in a memorial lecture on UP Law's founding centennial, Senator Edgardo J. Angara said that the days of these super lawyers were over - the age of experts has arrived. In our version "kiuĉasasduleporojn, kaptas neniun", the tendency of the Philippine legal profession is heading towards specialization with the skepticism about generalist. No one chased two long eared rabbits. First of all, they did a lot of basic work in the Daredevil series 1, and the Steel Serpent logo found in Mrs. Gao's medicine showed the symbol of Tekworth's opponent Davos. Mrs. Kaohsiung hinted at a character named "Mother of Crane" in "Immortal Iron Fist". There is no conclusion, but it certainly means that there is a role in the myth of the wider Tekken. Jessica Jones knows that Jeri Hogarth (sexually curved Jeryn Hogarth, Danny's mentor, business manager, lawyer) is there. Of course, we have Luke Cage - Danny's Hero for Hire and the best partner. And then, at the rook cage, we have Danny's love, Misty Knight and her police partner Rafael Scarf (another common power man and iron fist) After the iron fist, 15 years ago the plane crash, Danny Land returned to New York as an iron fist and tried to crush the hands of his enemy, evil organization. In the night demon, the hand reveals that he has been corrupted, enslaves the people, and is willing to fight against the Ninja army. In contrast, despite similar cult behavior, kidnapping and homicide, the Central Prosecution of Tekken is a black market organization trying to mass produce and sell heroin. Hands broke into Danny's company Rand Enterprises and used its resources to promote heroin's illegal trade Willy Ricks raised his fist in a group of young students at King's Center in Auburn Avenue in Atlanta and shouted "Black Power". Photo: The children of John Fisher also raised their fists and they returned to salute. This is harmless fun. What is the big deal? Unless this radically and politically sacred Jesus is seeking a revolution, this school group may have been on the spot to learn more about the history of the blacks, and may have left. They do not know that he used the same fist and two words to help shake the world more than 50 years ago.

Mind, Matter and Descartes "Cogito Ergo Sum", "So I think so", this is the representative of the logic of Rene de Carte. Descartes born in Lahei, France in 1596, studied at the Jesuit college, met the principal and childhood, and made it possible to lead a relaxed lifestyle. This richness and lack of daily responsibility gave him the opportunity to express his dissatisfaction with artificial philosophy, church philosophy, extreme skepticism in the Middle Ages and the impossibility of absolute knowledge. The dualism of Descartes' mind and matter means the concept of humanity. According to Descartes, humans are a complex existence of thought and body. Descartes prioritizes the mind and thinks that the mind can exist without the body but the body can not exist without the mind. In meditation, Descartes believes that although the mind is a substance, the body consists only of "accidents". However, he believes that the mind and body are closely related. Nature tells me through pain, hunger, thirst, etc. Together, I will form a unit with the body. I will not feel pain even if my body is hurt, but I will only be perceived by intelligence just as a crew sees something broken on his ship. Between the mind and the substance, especially between the human body and the mind. Descartes said reality involves two separate material ideas and materials. Descartes guarantees us that both are true, but they will not see either unless they perceive the behavior, and perceptual behavior has no double nature to fill the gap There is no doubt. The problem is to explain the composition of the medium or medium in which the various basic substances are related. The second relation hypothesis is that perception is directly related to reality. The first philosopher normally associated with this is John Rock (1632-1704). Locke argues that this is a blank state or slate and that all knowledge is engraved by experience. He started with philosophy and pointed out that all the principles of science derive from it. Descartes believed that "the perfection of God, the essence of reality, including the essence of mind and substance, human thought comes from natural thought, as well as the mechanized biology concept, the main attribute of God I will be able to recognize it. " In those days Descartes did not claim the difference between life and inanimate objects, but he redefined the boundary between the soul and the soul. The soul interprets conscious sense, visual and memory experience between perception and decision - making. "(Archie, 2004)

Franklin is a Puritan or Enlightened Thinker about Benjamin Franklin Benjamin Franklin from a very simple Calvinist background. Although he had formal education, by his own efforts, he became a rare genius in human history. Thinking and will, talent and art, strength and comfort, tact and elegance that seemed to meet this person, almost everything turned out: printers, essestists, scientists, politicians, philosophers, political economists Ambassador wait for a moment. ° All industries of Jack It can be said that Benjamin Franklin is the greatest example of American enlightenment. Franklin is a child of Boston's inconspicuous Puritan family, with little formal education, but has become a pioneer in publishing, science and diplomacy. Prior to the American Revolutionary War, it was an outstanding American in the "Republic" across the Atlantic Ocean. At first glance, Franklin's religion also seems to be consistent with the pattern of educational secularism. As in his teens, as he told us in his autobiography, Franklin accepted skepticism of Christianity and made him "a complete deity". But in his adult life, Franklin showed signs of long lasting influence on his parents' beliefs. He will never accept all the teachings of traditional Christian faith, but the framework of this belief, rhetoric, even even customs has had a strong influence on him. Franklin is a Puritan or Enlightened Thinker about Benjamin Franklin Benjamin Franklin from a very simple Calvinist background. Although he had formal education, by his own efforts, he became a rare genius in human history. Thinking and will, talent and art, strength and comfort, tact and elegance that seemed to meet this person, almost everything turned out: printers, essestists, scientists, politicians, philosophers, political economists Ambassador wait for a moment. All of Jack's ... the enlightenment was called enlightenment The historical period was held in the second half of the 17th century and the first half of the 18th century. This period is characterized by a significant increase in the importance of scientific and philosophical investigation. Political philosophy is one of the most common and important areas of theory and discourse. One of the most famous political theorists is a man named John Rock. His theory will be completely changed in this way

The way of doubt is a systematic reasoning that all beliefs are rejected and in the next step it is checked whether they are certain before becoming knowledge. The father of this method is Renee Descartes. Descartes believed that this knowledge would not be justified, so he began using two tools to pursue the truth: suspicion and analysis. Doubt is his important tool from the doubt of finding the truth. "The basic strategy of Descartes' skeletal approach is to defeat skepticism in its own way. Descartes is trying to create a solid foundation for new science with a skeptical approach. This method should be based on unquestioned things. When Descartes took a skeptical approach, he doubted everything he got from his senses. The strategy adopted by Descartes is to hide his thoughts from things that are completely sure and doubtful. He decided that he should not cheat his existence. If he does not exist, he will not think; therefore, if he is thinking, he must exist. This is the sum of Cogito's ergo, "I think I am". For the first consideration, and for Descartes this is the highest priority. "The heart is better known than the body," Descartes not only proves that his existence is the substance, mind of thinking, but also believes that the body becomes a foreign matter to worry about later. From the grounds to the conclusion After examining the origin of Descartes metaphysics, this paper will question the contradiction of the Cartesian law. Rene Descartes started his investigation by doubting all sorts of knowledge, and he further believed that things that might be suspected were completely wrong. Why is the idea of ​​perfection perfect indefinitely come true using Descartes' method? If infinitely perfect God's thought doubts how he can infer the existence of God from this suspicious thinking?

In this article, we will explain the answers of five experienced teachers to 10 questions. The interview was done by telephone. These interviews included 3, 5, 10, 15, 20 years of teachers. However, the interview includes the educational style, how they relate to real world situations including education, and their personal educational philosophy. After understanding that these teachers are beneficial to the student's educational priorities, 10 questions and answers are discussed and evaluated. Ten interviews were conducted, five of which were taught by the teachers of the 4th, 5th and 6th graders; parents of 5 children aged 8 to 13 years. Please contact a potential respondent by phone. The interview is semi-structured. This helps to guide accurate conclusions. This can be seen in the next study on the existence of the question, media coverage of terrorism will have a bad psychological impact on young people. The effects include anxiety, depression, acute stress disorder, post traumatic stress disorder, and sleep disorder. Immediately after the trauma, I witnessed an emotional reaction. This includes the necessity of crying in tears with someone. Games and learning are also affected. Drama may be affected by traumatic subjects and aspects When the teacher 's interview came foolish, skepticism immediately appeared. What is the appropriate level of role-playing strength in demo classes? Experienced teachers and student actors may want to have fun on a hot summer afternoon. Or they may be shaking a huge red flag about school culture. Since it is not always easy to distinguish between them, the invitation committee should clarify beforehand. For example, the interviewer can explain the course as follows.

Next Big Thing is a builder for IoT companies and provides a complete framework to accelerate IoT business. We are composed of powerful business architects, technology experts, and experienced founder. Our planning approach refines and develops the most valuable idea and leads our business through the development process. With the support of our prosperous ecosystem, NBT's unique enterprise building model drives our business to success As a builder of Internet companies in Berlin's things, NBT offers a complete framework to accelerate IoT companies. NBT will promote digital conversion and IoT-led innovation to emerging companies and companies across Europe and lead the company's digital conversion through the Internet's Internet, block chain and business insight. Together with the other participants of this conference, we are interested in developing smarter solutions to real world problems. The hinterland of the Internet 's Internet reveals the maturity of the business environment in Germany, the symbiotic relationship between companies, SMEs and start - up companies is clearly moving forward. By combining each player's expertise and skills, we can reach these solutions quickly. The Internet's Internet (IoT) is rapidly growing. However, maintaining centralized management of the IoT system is the main bottleneck of the network. A distributed block chain is a potential solution and more companies can expect to cost-effectively manage the IoT system using block chains. Smart Contract automates many manual operations in a wide range of industries. Smart contracts can automate transactions as long as certain conditions are met. Insurance companies like AIG are investing in block chain applications to improve current plans. In 2018 there will be more such effort. Companies such as IBM are using block chains to block chains to achieve supply chain visibility. This shows how powerful Block Chaining Technology is with the Internet's Internet (IoT). Using visual intelligence contract manufacturers that do not need programming knowledge soon, owner of small businesses they think they are they always but they get them when they they are they they are they they order them You can make a smart contract that guarantees to be guaranteed. Alternatively, if the conditions specified in the smart contract to manage the transaction are not met, the refund is paid immediately and there is no controversy in all conditions. In many respects, the block chain and things' Internet are perfect pairs. Block chains are currently protecting the world's most valuable cryptographic currency. The embedded smart contract and distributed network are important solutions to the IoT security problem. Although centralized servers will be at risk, block chains distribute risk to hundreds of servers around the world. Last week, the public image of CEO, JP Morgan Chase Damon, and cryptic skepticism admitted that "The block chain is genuine" in an interview with Fox business. Thus, Dimon is a technology that block chains can have a major impact on the industry as a whole. It's true, but it's definitely not ready

Rational, abstract and structured consideration on philosophy (Greek to Latin, philosophy, "love of wisdom"), the whole reality or basic aspects of human existence and experience. Philosophical exploration is a core element in the history of many civilizations The subject of philosophy is handled in many articles. Discussions on the main system of oriental philosophy are Buddhism, Chinese philosophy, Confucianism, Taoism, Hinduism, Indian philosophy, Jainism, Japanese philosophy, Shintoism, Sikhism For historical reports on Western philosophy, please refer to Western philosophy. Discussions on philosophy on the main religious traditions of the West refer to Christianity: Christian philosophy, Islam: Islamic philosophy, Judaism: Jewish philosophy. Discussions on the West's main schools, exercise, and systems refer to atomism, analysis philosophy, European philosophy, deconstructionism, existentialism, idealism, phenomenology, empiricism, postmodernism, pragmatism, the world view Please give me. Realism; Shihlin; skepticism; stoic school; Utilitarianism Regarding the biography of the main philosopher of the West and the handling of the movement related thereto, Aristotle and Aristotleism, Rene Descartes and Descartesism, Epicurean and Epicureanism, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel and Hegelism, Immanuel · Kant and Kantism, Karl Marx and Marxism, Plato and Platonism, Pythagoras and Pythagoreanism In order to cover a specific field of Western philosophy, referring to aesthetics, epistemology, ethics, thought, logic, metaphysics, biological philosophy, educational philosophy, historical philosophy, philosophy of language, philosophy of logic, philosophy of mathematics, philosophy of philosophy Please give me. Philosophy Philosophy, Religious Philosophy, Philosophy of Science Metaphysics 234 Philosophy of the Mind 191 Philosophy of the Language 172 Epistemology 160 Normative Ethics 139 Philosophy of the 17th and 18th Century 107 Philosophy of Society and Politics 102 General Philosophy of Science 94 Logic and Logic Philosophy 92 Philosophy of Ancient Greece 64 Philosophy of Ancient Greece 64 Philosophy 56 Philosophy of Cognitive Science 56 Religious Philosophy 47 Application Ethics 44 Behavior Philosophy 43 Philosophy of the 20th Century 42 Biological Philosophy 38 Philosophy of the 19th Century 37 Decision Theory 31 Philosophy of the Law 28 Philosophy of the Mainland 25 Philosophy of the Mainland 25 Philosophy of the RMB 25 Social Philosophy 21 Stochastic Philosophy 19 Sex, Race, Sex Philosophy 17 Philosophy of the Middle Ages and the Renaissance 17 Asia's Philosophy 10 Computing and Information Philosophy 2 American Philosophy 2 Africa / Africa's Philosophy 2 The subjects chosen for consideration are: political philosophy, economics and economic philosophy, education and educational philosophy, natural philosophy, social philosophy, and scientific philosophy of the 20th century. These different sub-disciplines are intertwined not only with the application of philosophy, but also basically with the mainstream of philosophical thinking. Why include economics and economic philosophy in education and educational philosophy? In addition to the development of independent natural sciences, the same applies to natural philosophy.

Enlightenment (or called enlightenment or rational period) is a traditional intellectual movement that began in Europe in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, emphasizing reasons and individualism rather than tradition. Its purpose is to reform the usage of reason in that area based on experimental thinking of rehearsals and beliefs, and advanced vision to transcend logical methods. It promotes logical beliefs, skepticism and intellectual communication. It challenges superstition and intolerance and is the most popular goal of the Catholic Church. Impact of Illuminati to European society Illuminati is also known as "age of reason". These names represent the era of America and Europe in the 18th century. Meanwhile, humanity has changed from a century of ignorance to a person characterized by respecting humanity, science and reason. People involved in enlightenment believe that the reason of mankind will discover the natural laws of the universe and determine human natural rights. Despite confidence and enthusiasm for human reasons in enlightenment - it is sometimes called "era of reason" - regardless of scientific practice or knowledge theory, the rise of empiricism is a characteristic of this age . The enthusiasm for the reason of the Enlightenment is not a rational ability as a source of independent knowledge, but it is a problem at this time, but it is in human cognitive ability. The age of Reason is in contrast to the era of religious faith and contrasts with the era of sensory experience. The ideal of enlightenment and Tartuf enlightenment can be seen in many works of this era. Some of the features normally associated with enlightenment. This is the era of reason. At this time, people began to use reasonable ideas to understand and understand nature and guide the existence of humans. In Tartuffe of Moriere, this ideal is expressed by the character of the king. - When Tartuffe's character talks about it, they do not talk about what they are actually seeing, they believe they understand. The problem in the story relates to not seeing it. Orgon refused to see the fact that Tartuffe is a hypocrite until he believes it with his own eyes at the end of the game. For information on Orgon's contribution to Tarfuffer, see page 319.

Why did not women vote before 1914? In this question, I would like to emphasize all the key points and sources of women who did not vote before 1914. Women's voting is always relatively low priority. The prewar parliament consisted entirely of men and was focused on Irish hometown domination, more serious industrial problems, and German threats. With the outbreak of the war in 1914, women abandoned the battle for voting and concentrated more on the causes of war. Please explain why women failed to vote before 1914. Women tried to get votes for years before 1900, but this is not a serious problem, they did not do much to achieve this. But in 1900 everything changed. NUWSS (Suffragists) and WSPU (Suffragettes) were established in early 1900; their goal is to give women the right to vote. - Wizards that I chose to write about something are generally considered contemporary, says dicitonary.com. This contemporary view reflects the advancement of technology and the desire for human beings to advance and improve. Why did not women vote before 1914? In this question, I would like to emphasize all the key points and sources of women who did not vote before 1914. Women's voting is always relatively low priority. The prewar parliament consisted entirely of men and was focused on Irish hometown domination, more serious industrial problems, and German threats. - The daily struggle of the working class, the fear of loneliness, and the reality of putting all energy into the plan of failure is the various themes related to John Steinbeck's novel "Mouse and Man". The role that the author draws is an individual who often encounters difficulties one after another. This book explains various conflicts such as people and society, people and people, people and persons, ideals and reality. I will explore why women could not get voting rights between 1900 and 1914. A revolution took place in society between 1900 and 1914. In the patriarchal society of the UK, women live in the house and are doing new exercises; women want to vote. These "new" women face many obstacles, one of which is the skepticism of the government. - Historical uncertainty of population expansion from 1775 to 1900 From 1775 to 1900, the population of the UK dramatically increased. Too much, to some extent, the population has doubled in 30 years.

After a strict review, until the late 1990s, call centers are now receiving important academic considerations. The surprisingly managed development of call centers confuses the early skepticism and far exceeds their starting point in finance and telecommunications. With the combination of telephone and VDU, the company's competitive advantage is enhanced, and immediate provision of customer service and sales by telephone leads to the spread of this phenomenon. The growing financial industry gives the British government a modern driving force, and by 2002, 25% of the government will be opened electronically. Now, there is a very good growth center. Located in the center of Virginia Beach, Edgar Casey Center is known as the Research Enlightenment Association and is managed perfectly at all levels. The American Theological Society's campus in Wheaton, Illinois is functioning well. The same can be said about the Esalen Institute. However, these are some exceptions. Generally speaking, I do not want to name it, but in a new era, intellectual search and open management ability is poor development culture. I am calm because I have been in this culture for about 20 years as a writer, speaker, publisher and seeker. And trusting me, I followed the map. Until recently, I was vice president of the publishing department of Penguin Random House, specializing in metaphysical books. My first job was telecommunications company's call center. After six weeks on the phone, I became a team leader and six weeks later I managed all the team leaders. When I was 21 years old, I managed two call centers and 60 employees. Two and a half years later, I strongly wanted to improve sales and marketing skills, so I quit my job and changed to recruitment and temporary staff. I ran on the ground and decided the timing of the movement. Three months after I joined the company, I signed a staff contract for the Sydney Olympic Games Ticket Hotline and offered my annual income budget every month. This encouraged me to be promoted to a nationwide sales and marketing team, which developed an evaluation center product for nationwide mass recruitment. All startups focus on time efficiency, saving customer time is key to success Tim Chatfield

Knowledge can only be obtained through experience, and experiences exist only as a unit of individual thought in thinking. This knowledge theory belongs to Scottish philosopher David Hume. Hume was born April 26, 1711 and is the second son of his family. His father died when he was a baby and asked his mother to take care of his brothers and sisters. David Hume gained great success through the general curriculum and discovered early love for literature. He lives in Ninewells, a family-owned land near Edinburgh. David Hume Hume, David, 1711-76, Scottish philosopher, and historian. Hume brings empiricalism of John Rock and George Berkeley to the logical extremes of fundamental skepticism. He denied the possibility of certain kinds of knowledge and found a series of emotions in his mind and believed that the causal relationship in nature was entirely from B's introduction. The answer to the theme is drawn by the time committee named as illusion by David Hume, and the time committee named human by himself. In the era of modern philosophy, when the influence of Descartes was still important, David Hume brought the argument of killing the Descartes I created and skipping it like a ghost in human perception. You can see not only the theme but also the contrast between Hume and Descartes. Knowledge can only be obtained through experience, and experiences exist only as a unit of individual thought in thinking. This knowledge theory belongs to Scottish philosopher David Hume. Hume was born April 26, 1711 and is the second son of his family. His father died when he was a baby and asked his mother to take care of his brothers and sisters. David Hume gained great success through the general curriculum and discovered early love for literature. - Tested in various ways: The Catholic clergy of today's church by Christopher Ruddy also reflects the first article at Obleash Theological Seminary in San Antonio, Texas. The 7th Bernardine Cardinal Conference 2003 Ruddy reports on the sharing of academic and pastorian expertise and the voice of being a pastor. In addition to the report, this book opens and completes Ruddy's insight.

McDonald's: Case Study McDonald's is the world's largest fast food company, originally founded in 1955, after Rock Rock suggested the idea of ​​opening several restaurants based on Dick and McDonald's original restaurant. McDonald 's was released in 1965, and in 1968 released the main product Big Mac. Today, McDonald's runs over 30,000 restaurants in over 100 countries and has one of the most famous brands in the world. McDonald 's sales in the US reached 57 billion dollars in 2006 and sales in the US exceeded 25 billion dollars (Standard & Poor' s). McDonald's Case Study While companies are seeking ways to integrate themselves into the international marketplace, many companies are looking at the public domain as a way of intercultural market. Values, cultural differences, language barriers, beliefs, other factors ... It is to make the organization's products and services successful. PR officials are responsible for becoming intermediaries between the organization and the public. Murphy and Dee (1992) says: "Public relations activities make organizations more effective by building relationships with stakeholders within the environment and these stakeholders may limit or enhance the mission of the organization. Has the arrival of McDonald's restaurant brought American culture to Japan? To what extent is cultural imperialism involved in this process? Before considering McDonald 's case study on Japan, I will briefly explain the concept of globalization. After a short history of McDonald's, I introduce introduction to Japan and briefly summarize how McDonald's found himself in Japanese society. Globalization exists in various forms. People can talk about 'globalization' from an economic point of view. In terms of trade and computer connectivity, countries around the world are increasingly dependent on each other. Cities such as London, Tokyo and New York are closely related in this way. Globalization plays a role in politics as each country builds closer relationships (Wilterdink and Heerikhuizen, 2003, 34). People also talked about globalization of culture. In "Global Culture: Dreams, Nightmare, and Skepticism", John Tomlinson wrote an article about "World Culture". First of all, we can not deny that the comparison of McDonald's of Bradford and McDonald's in China based on ethnographic research shows that McDonald's is a symbol of American culture, cheap, convenient and inhuman. . Technical service Global impact in the context of globalization Second, the situation of McDonald's and McDonald's reflects the homogeneity of the global culture beyond the characteristics of the disparity. In other words, McDonald's is the concept of achieving global social homogenization through the influence of multinationals.

It is a very poorly and light criticism of Tom Wolf's (apparently) medieval architecture from Bauhaus to our house. A serious architect fired it. It is (obviously) criticism of lightweight social design. A serious design critic ignores it. I think this is very interesting and very focused. Wolfe is a surprisingly excellent author of a new news style. He even described it as part of architectural criticism. I think he is wrong. I think that it is a fable to go to our house from Bauhaus. Designers advertise themselves, their preference is higher than their customers, who will use and use their designs? In other words, what happens when a designer tries to fix a person. In this case, the modification means that Bauhaus goes beyond the bourgeoisie and raises people's hobbies. Skepticism about modernism is not limited to the UK. In the United States, Tom Wolf wrote from Bauhaus to our house, from Bauhaus directly to the United States to explain the Prince of European silver, he wrote that he built houses that look like worker's house and pesticide factory. Reliable point He suggested that any attempt to actually sit on the Le Corbusier's reclining chair would adopt karate behind his neck. "In modernism attacks on inhumane behavior, and in the extreme case anything that can be filled with contemporary nicknames has concluded that modernism can not find beauty and that it is not worth it. I thought, "Wilk said. The mind still believes in the early moral mission of modernists. Therefore, the crime of a concrete tower where Le Corbusier's design is inadequate and construction is inadequate has little to do with his work. Among all of Tom Wolf's diving, he promised to tidy up the chaos for all and all at once. Mr. Wolf's "From Bauhaus to our house" like 1975's "Words of Painting" is a theoretical structure surrounding artistic creation and a long article in a book trying to adopt rhetorical clouds is. In the early books, his argument was that the theory of American painting after the war became more important than the painting itself - indeed, this was the reason for painting, and the work Mr. Wolf found himself It is totally inaccessible, or at least unpleasant

Whether morality is related to culture. The basis of this argument is the fundamental question of whether morality is culturally related or has its own desire. The advantage of this discussion is that you can judge whether morality is true justice. As Melville J. Herskovitz advocates the concept of cultural relativism, "morality is a diverse and unique code variant, ethical threat comes from culture, culture, beliefs and beliefs," he insisted . Society, we must have the right to declare society as inhumane. Moral relativism does not believe that moral facts are independent of personal or cultural beliefs or desires. Depending on the version of relativism, the given moral description is correct only when it considers (for moral subjectivity) or culture (for cultural relativism) as one. . In the belief of epistemology, belief that belief as knowledge's position should be judged reliably. For example, scientific experiments are considered more reliable than intuition and speculation. Representationism shows that humans do not directly recognize the outside world (and can not directly recognize them), but instead they only know their own ideas and interpretations of the world's objects It is a philosophical concept. Therefore, a barrier or perceived veil may interfere with direct knowledge about others. There is a "veil" between the soul and this world. Moral relativism, also called "cultural relativism", indicates that morality is related to each culture. When behavior violates ethical principles, people can not judge correctly the members of other cultures in addition to their own cultural standards. Moral principles may be different from their own moral principles. Shweder, Mahapatra and Miller (1987) argue that different cultures define moral boundaries differently. This term is also different from moral subjectivity. Moral subjectivity is the idea that moral truth is related to individuals. Moral relativism can be thought of as a form of moral skepticism and is often mistaken for moral pluralism. It opposes the moral superiority and ethnic-centered attitude in moral absoluteism and moral universalism. Rather than the variability of personal ethics (fairness, justice, rights)

Autism and Sabin Syndrome A small boy is sitting quietly in front of a piano. His teacher sat on the bench next to him, played a series of complicated chords, and the air was full of beautiful melodies. After the hearing, the boy began playing and reproduced the song just heard. As the last sound disappears, the boy sits quietly for a while, then starts swinging slowly back and forth, stopping only after the music resumes. Shaun Murphy (Freddie Highmore, "Bates Motel"), a young surgeon with autism and academic syndrome, has moved from a quiet country life to a famous hospital operating theater. Sean can not contact people around him all over the world he saves his life and uses his special medical gift to challenge his colleague skepticism. On a very basic level, this relates to Dr. Shawn Murphy, a recent remake of Korean drama. This is a good pilot, you can understand the original story, you can also understand the content of the medical drama. The two programs I thought after reading were House and Korean programs. This contrasts with the two shows. Because the story and structural elements are different. One difference I saw here was that the show felt not to last very long. Dr. House plays an arrogant role and how the show develops his role is to show him that he is soft or to show that he became arrogant in the background story . In a sense, there is a way to further develop his character. An interesting premise about autistic syndrome has good potential so far: a good doctor (S01E01) Autism is not mental retardation. Some autistic people have very smart people. For example, there is much evidence that Einstein may be autism. Autism is not a "scholar" syndrome. There are "scholars" among autistic people, but most people do not. However, other autistic people have "talented" and advanced "general" intelligence. Many autistic people have normal intelligence, but some people are late (Twachtman). Autism is not an emotional problem. Autism is a neurological disorder that people usually develop at birth. Psychological trauma does not lead to it. Autism is not a lack of mental illness or physical contact. People choose autism. Autism is not "fate worse than death." People with autism have some faults, but some people live a very happy and rewarding life. Many autistic people do not want to "heal". Because it's like erasing them and replacing them with other people.

Empiricism (try something for yourself): All knowledge has to pass the doctrine of sensory communication; there is no natural idea that it is enough to remember (Ie Plato) All knowledge can be reduced to feelings. In other words, our concept is simply to feel the image. In short, there is no other knowledge besides knowledge gained through perceptual observation. Remember, according to Descartes, the first thing I know is my opinion. At that time, he wondered if this fictitious world would exist, so he began with his own idea and then became a reality next (not the other way). Knowledge can only be obtained through experience, and experiences exist only as a unit of individual thought in thinking. This knowledge theory belongs to Scottish philosopher David Hume. Hume was born April 26, 1711 and is the second son of his family. His father died when he was a baby and asked his mother to take care of his brothers and sisters. David Hume gained great success through the general curriculum and discovered early love for literature. - Tested in various ways: The Catholic clergy of today's church by Christopher Ruddy also reflects the first article at Obleash Theological Seminary in San Antonio, Texas. The 7th Bernardine Cardinal Conference 2003 Ruddy reports on the sharing of academic and pastorian expertise and the voice of being a pastor. In addition to the report, this book opens and completes Ruddy's insight. David Hume Hume, David, 1711-76, Scottish philosopher, and historian. Hume brings empiricalism of John Rock and George Berkeley to the logical extremes of fundamental skepticism. He denied the possibility of certain kinds of knowledge and found a series of emotions in his mind and believed that the causal relationship in nature was entirely from B's introduction. The answer to the theme is drawn by the time committee named as illusion by David Hume, and the time committee named human by himself. In the era of modern philosophy, when the influence of Descartes was still important, David Hume brought the argument of killing the Descartes I created and skipping it like a ghost in human perception. You can see not only the theme but also the contrast between Hume and Descartes. David Hume raised doubts about the world's knowledge with the option of "skeptical of understanding behavior." This problem is related to induction problems. David Hume was one of the first people to decide to analyze this problem. He begins to choose by providing a form of segmentation of human knowledge and then discusses its dependence on reasoning and experience. According to Mr. Hume, people believe that the future will be similar to the past, but there is no evidence to support this belief. In this article, we will clarify the form of knowledge and inference and verify inductive problems of Hume. This is a challenge to the explanation of legitimate faith because there is no reason for belief.

Faith Christians asserts responsibility for the beginning and the end of life Christian believes that God led our life before our concept. He chose what we are going to do, so we should protect our lives and keep them. Everyone's life is different and sacred. Early Christian literature, Didache said: "You should not kill your fetus in your mother's womb." This is a traditional Christian doctrine from the age of Jesus. The beginnings of Christianity are not based on an exclusive belief system. Christian faith is based on the reaction of God's love for sinners hateful to you and me. There is nothing narrow or elite because of the belief that "Like you". Charles Spurgeon is a strong teacher of Christians, "When considering that he was completely lost and destroyed, his whole body is polluted and filthy without contaminated parts, declares a sin, then says Jesus' Seeing the cleansedness through blood and the grace of God, seeing that sin died, I see the soul of the man suffering the benevolent eyes of the Lord. "Christian" or "Jewish - Christian" European defenders rarely talk about Christianity in the sense of belief system (they rarely mention it separately). In most European countries, at least many citizens do not have religious beliefs. In addition, people who want to change other people to Christianity (of the version they prefer) should not feel that they are threatened by the influx of Muslim immigrants. If this threatens their beliefs, this belief must be fairly weak. Christian believers should not be afraid, but you can say even that immigrants from other backgrounds should be welcomed. why? If Christian believers really not mind their own beliefs but also want to care about the beliefs of others, that is, they want to "save" others, the Western world is more Muslim than the Islamic world It must be a better place to teach. Normally illegal or almost unbearable Stark did not try to deny the Christian faith everywhere, that is, God was working at the beginning of the Christian campaign. Instead, he wants to study this fast-growing approach. He believes that social science ends several generic and permanent myths about the rapid growth of Christianity. The meaning of this transition from one religious organization to another religious organization is that the middle class and the privileged class tend to convert from the lowest class. Stark must "always leave to them a new religion through traditional religious weakness in market openness", and "religious skepticism is the most common among more privileged people" It has said. Why is this happening? Stark believes that the person who best understands the new religion and who believes in the necessity of faith is the most economically privileged (39).

******* Get up and tear it up into small pieces, I'm just lying on my head Losing this love makes me feel inappropriate, so I'm waiting for something to fill the space in the sky So, what you said about Andy, or "gold" was born in the novel (Hello, poetry!), Led a series of questions about love. Sarah Kay often talks about writing poetry as a question making process - doing something on the page, or finding answers or more questions within the process. When you ask David Orr of poetry critic, he may tell you that poetry and music are two different art forms. His response to the Bob Dylan Nobel Prize for Literature almost summarized his skepticism about the blurring of music and poetry boundaries. Literature and composition Langston Hughes and Bob Dylan Langston Hughes and Bob Dylan are two contemporary American poet poets from different eras. Bob Dylan is like a composer, but I consider most of his work as poetry. In this article I will explain the Hughes poem "Harlem" and Dylan's "A-Changin era" as a cultural explanation, but the background is different. Both poets use social protest actions to express their views. - The poems of Langston Hughes 's "I, Too" and Karen' s "Event" use different forms of visual images, tones, exaggerations, symbols and prophecies to explain the commonalities between the two different races ing. The interaction of life can not fight their prejudice like the private life of African-American civil war. Poetry was always my treatment. For the women who are nervous, nervous and worried, my only expression is poetry as a result of sneaky bastards that freeze in the middle of discussion. I grew up as the youngest of two brothers and sisters, and my voice drowned in the authority of the people who seemed to know better. But personally the situation is different. In my bedroom's privacy, I am a teacher, a speaker, a powerful poet. I pretend to be an audience, perform my poems, dramatic pauses, and emphasized phrases. I have not talked to anyone over the years, I think that it is strange and strange that it has no one else. After all, I wrote something personal. You can not make a stage together with personal things.

Whether humans really have free will or whether their lives are completely decided is decided. This free will problem continues to be a place of philosophical debate forever. Many great philosophers tried to answer this question, but none of them answered as much as Immanuel Kant. He put the foundation of his argument in the foreword of the future metaphysics. In response to David Hume 's skepticism, Kant wrote this method, so Kant made a more resolute attempt to metaphysics. The philosophy of the great German philosopher Immanuel Kant in the late 1700s was the foundation of almost all philosophical development since then. Kant's philosophy is called Critical Philosophy or Transcendental Philosophy. Hume's skeptical philosophy spurred Kant's attempt to achieve a combination of rationalism and empiricism. In his "critique of pure reason" (1781), Kant tried to provide a critical explanation of the power and limitations of human reasons to decide what is known and what is not known I will. Kant's conclusion is that reasoning only provides knowledge about what we see and not about things themselves. Kant believes that not only the facts of the facts presented by the senses but also the mind plays an active role in understanding. Ideas do this through basic categories or understanding These categories or forms of understanding are independent of experience. Emmanuel Kant (1724-1804) German philosopher. Kant's "critique of pure reason" tries to combine reason from experiences between reason and empiricism to experience and to remove philosophy. Kant's philosophy affects future German idealists and philosophers such as Shelling and Schopenhauer. Thomas Paine (1737-1809) British and American writers and political activists. He is an avid supporter of American independence. Pain wrote many articles to support Republican ideals. This had a major impact on the revolution in America and France. The noteworthy works are as follows. Human rights (1791) Philosophy of the 1800s. Kant's philosophy stimulated various ideologies such as G. W. F. Hegel and Karl Marx in Germany during the 1800's. Hegel has developed a theory of historical change called the dialectic. There, the conflicting conflict led to the creation of a new unity, and it led to the opposite. Hegel 's theory was transformed into dialectical materialism by Marx. Marx believes that only material things are genuine. He said that all ideas are based on the economy. He believes that dialectics of conflict between capitalists and industrial workers will lead to the establishment of communism, he calls it social and political systems.

Fade and aesthetics Many people may be wondering if the era of the 1890s was the beginning of a new era, and the end is still changing. This era is often said to be modern, progressive, and different. Many people experiment, invent, and try new things. Devastation and aesthetics have emerged. Collapse is a dark side of romanticism because it involves forbidden experiences. Decadence is called morality, society, art. As BECKSON said, "The dark side of Romanticism comes from slopes and other writers that define it as a stranger in harmony with beauty" (p. 40). Sports that peaked in the 1890s - symbolism, decline and aesthetics, the most famous examples are Paris and Beardsley's MALALME, Toulouse Lautrec and Debussy, Charles Condor and British Oscar Wilde. These ideas and concerns - indeed, the influence of ideology - have been affecting the creation of modernism for decades. Expression does not refer to the change itself, but in this case, many people define it as the First World War, but that will come. Pessimism afflicts poets such as Conrad, Thomas Hardy, Matthew Arnold and TS Some of the reasons for Eliot were promoted by the decline of religious beliefs and evolutionists such as scientists, philosophers, and Darwin It is general skepticism. Followers of the literary movement of the 19th century began with French aesthetics. The devastated literature is fascinated by arrogance and morbidity, looking for innovation and emotion - "new pleasure"; attention to mysticism; and belief in the meaninglessness of human beings. This movement is closely related to the theory of art and art. The term "decline" may be used to indicate a decline in the quality of art or literature after a long period of time. The main failures in France are Charles Borderer and Arthur Limbo. The collapse of the UK includes Oscar Wilde, Ernest Dawson and Frank Harris The article "Aesthetics and Decade" of the British Library conveys the main features of this non-traditional age. It shocked the establishment of the Victorian era by challenging traditional values, emphasizing sensuality, promoting art, gender, political experiments. As one of the leaders of aesthetics, the art movement is to propose "art for art", art is not political or morally meaningful, and that more attention should be paid to beautifying the art Wild thinks.

Defined freedom is the power and the right for people to behave, talk and think without disturbing or restraining. To pursue religious freedom is a reason to protest a lot of people or to escape from their homeland so that they can practice and disseminate beliefs. Even before we become the United States there are many stories of history showing how people stand up and fight for their religion. People who came up with Mayflower and Roger Williams are examples of people who initially did not get religious freedom but opposed that they knew they were religious. Americans involved in the revolutionary war are fighting for religious freedom and political freedom. The pursuit of religious freedom comes from both the antiprotentist tradition and the ideal of understanding of religious tolerance. Many of the founders of the United States were strongly influenced by questions about the European Enlightenment, Christian skepticism, criticism of the religious war, its natural beliefs, and supernatural revelation. Thomas Jefferson believes that the alliance of clergy and political officials inevitably leads to tyranny, and he believes that clergy should not be appointed as a political position. Sometimes he called them "real antichrist". In return, some New England missionaries attacked Jefferson himself as an anti Christ and warned that if he was elected President, he would dispose of all the Bible and set up a place of prostitution in the church. Thomas Jefferson keeps the freedom of American religion, including freedom of Muslim religion. Jefferson clearly stated Muslims when he wrote a Virginia religious freedom movement. In his autobiography, Jefferson says "The bill to establish freedom of religion was finally passed ... ... the single proposition proves that protection of that opinion means universal protection "Presence: If the preface claims to be a sacred writer of our religion deviating from the plan by inserting the word" Jesus Christ "," Our religious Bible Jesus A proposal to be written is written as "a plan to depart from Christ". Most people were rejected, proving their intention that the Jews and Gentiles, Christians and Mohammedans, Hindus and heathens understand within their respective protection. President Jefferson joined the Tunisian Ambassador in 1809. I participated in Eid al-Fitr

Introduction of Provence Provence was originally used in southern France. The northernmost tip is Poitou, Limousin, Dove. The romantic language comes from Latin. The earliest text of the 11th century (3) survived in the 11th century. La Chanson de Sainte Foy (1033) is the only true feat. Bard poet at the beginning of the 12th century. Lyrics of top genres, especially fragrant (love poetry), also important sirventes (satire), moral and religious poetry, and partimen (poetry of controversy). In the 13th century, Provence began a new religious tendency and introduced the University of Talmud in the form of a mysterious research novel called Kabbala (literally "traditional") that widespread rapidly in northern Spain. Cabalist believers expressed Gnosticism with Rabbi's nephew, designed esoteric vocabulary and reinterpreted the Bible and the rabbis as a parable of various patterns in which God appears in the spiritual world. These patterns are reserved for other doctors. The most famous literary work in this new circle is Zoha ("Book of Glory"), Moses de Leon (about 1250-1305), and many mysterious comments on the Torah, then the mystery of the Jews I added it to become the Bible of principle. Indeed, in the beginning of the 13th century, some mystics backed up campaigns to condemn philosophical research on skepticism, liberalism, and respect for traditional literature. There are lots of lovely ancient stone bridges in Provence. Many are Romans, often used around 2000 after construction. Many of Provence's bridges are "new", dating back to the Middle Ages, several hundred years ago. Roman Pon Julian (photo on the left) has recently just started regular road traffic and is currently reserved for major bicycle roads and hikers. It should be a British lavender farm but I was immediately returned to Provence. It is missing only the bottle of Pastis, the bowl of olives, baguette, and the sun of Provence. Unfortunately, as there are many cloudy days on today's day, the shadow of mottled pattern has a big influence on the photos of the garden. The exhibition garden is now about creating stories and telling stories as well as landscaping and planting. Lavender garden may not be the most creative garden, or the most original garden, but it creates an atmosphere to take you to another place.

David Hume explains how you can not predict the future with a human understanding survey. Our experience and inference tells us that the object is functioning in a predictable way but we can not prove how the object is based on future previous interactions. After biting pizza we are looking forward to a pleasant taste. As our past experiences have proved this, this pleasant taste is predictable. Even though we think that the behavior of a pizza can be predicted to be the same as previous experience, it may only explode when chewing. David Hume Hume, David, 1711-76, Scottish philosopher, and historian. Hume brings empiricalism of John Rock and George Berkeley to the logical extremes of fundamental skepticism. He denied the possibility of certain kinds of knowledge and found a series of emotions in his mind and believed that the causal relationship in nature was entirely from B's introduction. The answer to the theme is drawn by the time committee named as illusion by David Hume, and the time committee named human by himself. In the era of modern philosophy, when the influence of Descartes was still important, David Hume brought the argument of killing the Descartes I created and skipping it like a ghost in human perception. You can see not only the theme but also the contrast between Hume and Descartes. David Hume raised doubts about the world's knowledge with the option of "skeptical of understanding behavior." This problem is related to induction problems. David Hume was one of the first people to decide to analyze this problem. He begins to choose by providing a form of segmentation of human knowledge and then discusses its dependence on reasoning and experience. According to Mr. Hume, people believe that the future will be similar to the past, but there is no evidence to support this belief. In this article, we will clarify the form of knowledge and inference and verify inductive problems of Hume. This is a challenge to the explanation of legitimate faith because there is no reason for belief.

Factors that contribute to the success of an organization depend on the rapid management team's development period and management approach to ensure the success of the organization over time. To predict the most important factors for an organization to succeed in the next five to ten years, you need to refer to scholarships related to that field. Various factors were identified in the survey, their effectiveness was investigated and the role of organization's success was investigated with the help of surveys. The purpose of this article is Pfeffer and Veiga's article "People-Oriented, Organizational Success". No.2 in 1999. The premise of this white paper is that the success of an organization basically depends on the quality of its staff and the ability to manage its investment. This concept may seem obvious, but the reality is different. This guide provides a framework that includes three key elements necessary for an organization leader to succeed in digital transformation. This article also shows the importance of combining the three human factors of organization success, winning skepticism within the company, and adopting a change management strategy to build an alliance with any organization's transformation program. The motivation for employees and stakeholders to accept (digital) change is the most complicated and difficult to deal with in some cases. An organization is a complex social system that strives to stabilize internal forces and survive. Therefore, the current situation is often powerful and places people in everyday life. Why does it change when things go well? Do not change the winning team. But even though things are going wrong, people are trying to make the wrong machine function. Survival and Success So organizations need not only administrators but also leaders. As mentioned earlier, leadership and governance in the organization are critical to the success of the organization, and there are different angles between leaders and managers. Leaders will focus on their organization's vision; managers are studying ways to achieve company goals in a short time

The appearance and reality appearance and reality have never been drawn as a big difference like Hamlet. Fraud moves freely throughout the game, affecting all characters and causing torture and confusion for everyone. Three complicated characters use betrayal because of their advantages because they create an appearance to carry out the plan, but their obscured thoughts prevent them from carrying them . All of the tragedies of Shakespeare are filled with delusions, false characters, but none deceive as much as Hamlet. The appearance of "Hamlet" is one of the central themes of Shakespeare's "Hamlet". The role of role in the play is the role of the hidden character - in fact the murderer and looter Claudius plays a role of sad brother and legitimate king, in her son's view Gertrude's Adultery plays a role she is the "most harmful woman" who plays the role of "the most beautiful queen". Even Hamlet himself played a crazy role in his attempt. Philosophical problems in Bertrand Russell's "appearance and reality" The approach to his subject in Bertrand Russell's "philosophical problems" involves Descartes' fundamental skepticism, in which the author cancels all previous assumptions It was. Certain reality and existence. In the first chapter, Russell 's quest for reality in reality compared to reality starts with observation of his surroundings. For example, I checked the form and he confirmed it The reality and fantasy from the appearance of Hamlet Shakespeare plays, Hamlet, ghosts, phantoms may be fantasies. Therefore, from the beginning Shakespeare presents an unreliable atmosphere with unnaturalness, it drives the actions of the drama, and as a struggle to clarify what is considered absolutely and what the reality is, to the hero It has developed. Therefore, Hamlet's idea became the core strength of the drama through the one hour story to choose the appearance and reality of yellow wallpaper, the direction of confrontation. These effects vary by occupation and may include happiness, sadness, anger or shock. Even authors trying to achieve the same effect can do it in very different ways. This article describes three short stories that shock the reader, but each uses a different approach to achieve that effect. And the story of Kate Chopin Hamlet's appearance and reality Hamlet is composed mainly of various opposing powers. One of these forces is the difference between appearance and reality, in other words the difference between appearance and reality. What is it, just how does it look like? I can see that Hamlet has made two main perspectives on this issue. First of all, there is a big difference between inner emotions and external emotions, and between them. In other words, it is useful for this task. "MLM of appearance and reality," William Shakespeare's "Hamlet" in "Hamlet" has revealed a consistent theme of apparent and reality in the overall role behavior. In many cases, but it seems so that there is sincerity and honesty, in fact, dishonesty and deception is usually the true intentions of personality. Specifically, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern, Hamlet and Claudius proved a discontinuity between appearance and reality. In the play, these characters

Victorian God's suspicion: Alfred Dinson's condolence When I first finished this work, I chased my brains to find my topics of interest and what I can learn. When I met Alfred Tennyson Sir, it caught my attention. My next decision is to choose one of his poems to study. I finally read the background in Memoriam, which makes me interesting. Memoriam is so long that I will only explain about it. In Victorian writers, the question about God is a universal theme. "In the character" Thomas Carlyle talked about the same god suspects of tennis, suspected of reflecting "British character" of Queen Victoria 's reign of "Music 82". Because Carlisle understands that people are meaningless in the field of things, I doubt human faith and therefore I want to know how humans respond to every problem in the world. He doubts many things, especially God. For Carlisle, God is not the answer to the question of the world. The concept of Victorian God and religion in the era of skepticism may help explain why Stevenson incorporated religion into his story. According to Sir Richard Evans' "Victorian: Religion and Science" website, where Gresham College is lecturing, Victorianism is a study of attitude and culture in late Victorian times, focusing on very ethical and cautious words It is. And behavioral ethics of the Victorian era. The Victorian ethics intensively expresses the moral values ​​of the Queen Victoria and the people living in the moral atmosphere of the 19th century, which is in stark contrast to the pre-Georgia morality. Many of these values ​​are seen in the British Empire. Today, the term "moral ethics" can represent any set of advocacy constraints, low tolerance for crime, and the value of strict social code of conduct. Prose: Analysis of religion and its function in Dr. Jekyll Dr. Robert Stevenson's strange case by Hydite The term "Victorian era" was first used during the London exhibition (1851), Victorian inventions and ethics were presented to the world. Victorian values ​​have developed in every aspect of Victorian living Victorian morality and values ​​can be attributed to religion, morality, elitism, industrialism, and improvement. These values ​​are derived from the ethics of the Victorian era and created the overall transformation of the British Empire. Historians believe that the present Victorian era is an era of contradictions such as widespread cultivation of dignity and self-control, spread of social phenomena such as prostitution and child labor. Under the strict class system, many social movements are born to improve the poor living environment common to many people.

John Patrick Shanley's drama "doubt" began with the teachings of loved and enlightened neighbor pastor Brendan Flynn, who states: "Suspicion can be a strong and strong bond" (Shanley 6) Sister Aloysius Beauvier is a strict traditional nun declared a school for the protection and protection of the St. Nicholas Church. It seems that Father Flynn seems to be the protagonist of the play, but Aister Aloisius is the opponent. Throughout the game my sister Aloysius Beauvier doubted that Flynn father had a 12 year old boy called Donald Muller. However, "suspicion" is not intended as a documentary on the possibility of sexual abuse. This is a doubt about the word titled in a certain world, by the director of Pulitzer and the Tony Award winning director of theater director John Patrick Shanley. For Aloysius, Flynn is of course guilty. The pastor seemed to be innocent, and the James sisters began to believe that her suspicion was wrong and meaningless. Flyn knew that a series of scandals would damage his career. This is a confrontation between the three sides under our accuracy and tension. If Father Frinn is innocent or guilty, it is difficult to make a decision. Doubting John Patrick Shanley 's metaphor, he passed through the truth very well. Toys, camping trips, undershirt scenes caused confusion, the audience walked around in the mind and doubted Father Flint. According to law, people are said to be innocent until proved to be guilty, but in fact, I know that everyone is guilty before anyone is proved innocent . - A country that was suffering from one of severe drought, excessive cultivation, and the greatest depression in history. Sandstorm destroyed the crops people depend on for survival everywhere in the Great Plains Suspicion is a 2008 American movie directed by John Patrick Shanley, based on the Pulitzer Prize and the Tony Award winning stage theater Doubt: A Parable. This film was produced by Scott Rudin and was held by St. Nicholas School led by Aloysius' sister (Meryl Streep). James Sister (Amy Adams) to Aloysius and Flynn Father (Philip Seymour Hoffman) said private concern with school's only black student, Donald Miller (Joseph Foster), is too high. Hughes started Crusades against Flynn. Also in the movie Viola Davis' mother, Donald Miller, Mrs. Miller. This movie is based on John Patrick Sanley's Pulitzer Prize-winning drama (doubt: fable) 2 This Oscar nomination work was written by Philip Seymour Hoffman. ) Between them shows a tension suspense. Pastor of a merciful Catholic school, supporting the progressive thoughts and empathy for unethical behavior; and Sister Aloisius (Merrills Trip) - the pastor is a traditional principal and the pastor is confident The focus of students' sexual abuse critics who are convinced are different, but almost all praise comments have a common theme. The movie is magnificent and complicated, as the end of the movie is ambiguous and eventually remains in the same painful state. This scene seems to overcome the skepticism of a seemingly sure sister of Aloysius - a country which can not be reconciled.

Introduction For centuries, Jews and Arab societies have been caught up in one of the most complex and long-standing conflicts known to mankind. That is the reason for the very difficult peace process. Unfortunately, for all peacebuilders around the world, the Arab-Israel conflict, especially between Israel and the Palestinian territory, is rooted in ethnic tension. Instead of attracting attention to the Israeli Government and Hamas senior executives, we need to look to more doubt and subtle realism theory about international relations that bring more problems than solutions. Important Question: What happened to the Israel-Palestinian peace process after the collapse of Camp David? Why is this happening? Since 2001, what has changed in the international relations between Israel and the Palestinian conflict? Why do many scholars have more doubts about the prospects of peace in Israel - Palestine? What is the potential international meaning of such skepticism? Main question: Since the conclusion of the Bush administration (2001 to 2009), how has the US policy toward the Middle East developed? How do scholars think that should change it? What are the major problems facing the United States in the future relationship with this region? What kind of opportunities and lessons should the United States learn from the relationship with the region? What is the impact of the EU's attempt to influence the Middle East's policy on how much Europe is catching up with the United States, the Middle East and North Africa? Does Haas's research reveal the role of ideology in international relations? POLI 365-001 John Creed Autumn 2013, MWF 9: 00-9: 50 am.m. 26 Coming St. (201) Office Hour, MW 11: 30 am - 12: 30 pm 953 - 8137 (Office) TR 2: 00-3: 30 and reservation system 953-5724 (message) Email: creedj@cofc.edu The main features of Israel, Palestine, international policy development, strategic thinking, political mechanics, demographics, social mechanics will form a relationship between Israel and Palestine in the coming years. These trends become part of a continuous feedback loop that affects the reaction of the parties in a way that improves these characteristics. As a result, this trend will strengthen, continue and strengthen the cycle of action and response. The predicted results in our scenario may already be present. The insensible cycle is beginning to get serious, putting pressure on the other side. PA bidding to the United Nations and International Criminal Court is one of the premises of our nonviolent resistance scenario. In response, Israel has withheld Palestinian tax for four months and has considered other behaviors that will bring economic loss to Palestinians.

H. P.'s supernatural Lovecraft The Outsider has been admired since its publication and is his most profound and meaningful thing. This story is explained in various ways, from Lovecraft's own autobiography to several different philosophical analyzes. Dirk Mosig is an explanation that compares the plot and setting of "The Outsider" with Lovecraft's own skepticism about religion and the world after death. (The prestigious biography of HP Lovecraft may be ST Joshi of the past and the future two.I am Providence.The shorter and easier to read biography is Paul Roland's curiosity of The Love Lovecraft.It is worth mentioning online Articles in The Atlantic, Salon, "New York Book Review", "Brain Brain" Articles are posted Arkham Archivist is the whole of HP Lovecraft, a free downloadable electronic book for Kindle and EPub readers The strange stories: the strange life of HP Lovecraft) The obvious feature of the type of fear is that it causes a reaction: emotions, mind and body. One of HP's most famous articles on Lovecraft cites his famous article "supernatural fear in literature." "Fear brings us back where we are" Older "battle or flight" reactions of our evolutionary heritage have played an important role in the lives of all people. Our ancestors lived and died. That is the root of the struggle for our survival. Then someone invented a fascinating civilization game and things began to calm down. Development has regained the wilderness from settlement. War, crime, and other forms of social violence are brought about from civilization, human beings begin to feed each other, but in general their daily lives are calm. Something is lost in the original life Many of the contemporary novels insisted that they died in the predecessor of contemporary zombie stories such as "Treasury" (1926) and "Outsiders" (1926) of "Cool Air" (1925) It is. Richard Matheson's 1954 novel "I am a legend" will also affect the zombie novel of the last referee, embodied in the classic film by George A Romero. The best hero of contemporary horror writer is Stephen King, which is known for raising the type of terrorism to the best selling position by writing Carrie, Shining, It, Misery etc. Since the 1970's, the story of Kim fascinated many audiences, and in 2003 he was cherished by the National Library Foundation.

Between the 2nd century BC and the century, the ACE Rome extended from the control of the city state to the Mediterranean Empire, the Roman Empire, it is the center of the civilized world. The era of Rome is over. Many people associate Rome with the United States. Rome rising to the power of the great world, Rome from zero, but they reached the peak, the US, then the same as today's fall. Rome and the United States are similar in many ways. Rome was an advanced civilization dominated by democracy in the past. Historians have been fascinated by the decline of great civilizations like ancient Greece and Rome. But for human beings, no more important lessons, rather than the collapse of the United States which has finished the era of virtue invisible in the dark age, and not including autumn than the whole planet. Ultimately even before the birth of the country was released, it destroys the powers of the United States of philosophy. This proposition can also be understood and the sun will not rise tomorrow, "Make sure that it does not become more contradictory Meaning: His philosophical skepticism of David Hume 1748" Investigate human understanding, "I wrote it rises. So we need to waste to prove that falsehood. 1781 ", so I know that it denies knowledge to make room for the necessary faith," he writes the criticism of pure reason Immanuel Kant "he founded, the founding of the United States 5 Published later years As usual, I am Patrick Wyman. You may still remember my old performance "Collapse of Rome". In Tides I am not only covering the fall of the Roman Empire but also the rise of the topic such as the rise of the modern world, the origin of the state, military revolution, capitalism and religious reform. Please consider the historical trend as a TV program that occurs at the same time in two seasons. The historical trend began with the podcast exploring the collapse of the West Roman Empire, "Roman Fall" but after reshuffling, by coping with the cause of Rome's fall, how to re-enter the social reintegration of the city, It will be bigger and more ambitious. To follow the late Middle Ages and the millennium early in modern Europe. Today, we are also hosting a lot of work together to communicate why history, archeology, sociology, religion, politics, and very delicate and complicated stories, moderator in terms of climate change, Patrick Wyman Patrick Wyman), you can tell us The world of life is how it looks

Descartes' meditation of the first philosophy In "the mediator of the first philosophy", Descartes tried to prove the existence of God in the third meditation. He will do this by suggesting some premises that will ultimately be firm arguments. First, I will explain why Descartes raised this question and whether God exists. Why Descartes is discussing at this point in the text that he is in need of this. Next, I explain in detail the Descartes' allegiance and the circumstances leading to the conclusion that God exists. In the third mediation of René Descartes's "First Philosophy Mediation" (entitled "About the existence of God"), Descartes established the principle of whatever is clearly recognizable by natural light. It is all true, and we use it to establish the existence of God. In meditation, 2 Descartes decides his real existence (after paying attention to meditation). In meditation, Descartes pointed out that he knew that he had ideas about God in his mind and asked why he thought about it. For Descartes, a business must have as much reality as reality. Since Descartes and other limited existence are less restrictive than the reality of God, only God can cause God's thought (see the summary of another God's proof of Descartes). This means that Descartes must exist in God. If God does not exist, Descartes will wonder if he can exist with His ideas about God. So God must exist to be the reason for our existence. Pondering the first philosophy validates Descartes' debate about the existence of God. The purpose of this paper is to explore Descartes' inference and proof of the existence of God. In the third meditation, Descartes presented two arguments to prove the existence of God, a trademark argument and a traditional cosmological argument. His claims are powerful and relatively realistic, but they do not prove the existence of God. At the beginning of meditation, Descartes began to refuse Descartes was skeptical at the first two mediation. Descartes first solves radical skepticism implied by an evil devilish argument by deciding that he is intellectual essence. According to Descartes, this "I" self-view is born, we are born, even a demon can not be doubted. By contemplating the first philosophy, Descartes metaphysics was established. It recognizes his physics, as you can see from the analogy of his tree. In philosophical principles Descartes calculates the fundamentals of physics, and the first part is actually meditation meditation (slightly different). "Principles" are texts which greatly influence the development of modern physics. For example, Isaac Newton (1643-1727) will develop his physics as a reaction to Descartes and use the latter as his own foil. Actually, Newton's Principia (principle) may be called a tribute to Descartes' book. Therefore Descartes' physics (and his metaphysics) are thought to be wrong, but it plays an important role in the development of modern physics.

Extreme rationalism rationalism is the idea that we can gain knowledge only through the process of mind. Empiricism is the idea that knowledge can only be gained through sensation. Because it is the basis of the scientific way of life we ​​use, the Western world employs empiricism. Various common proverbs such as "I believe in seeing" and "listening with my ears" indicate that we have accepted the use of sensations without a doubt. "Their extreme rationalism is a completely irrational creature through" observation "of all" reasonable "motives. If you obey the contrary or commit suicide, obey the urge. Topic 9: conquest of nature by humans is the consequence of nature by nature, that is, the natural impulse of the conditioner is the result of "human" including the conditioner itself. Masculinity - unconscious nature dominates regulators and dominates all humans through them. After political drama dust settled in the second half of the 18th century the extreme rationalism and skepticism supported by the Enlightenment reached that limit. Some people do not want to see humanity through a reasonable microscope. Romanticism came as an antidote. The era from Newton 's "Principia" ended in 1798 with the publication of "Sentimental Song" by Wordsworth and Coleridge. Among them, the poet wrote: "Not the wisdom, but the deep power of happiness, we see the things of life." The experience of "absurd world" has created a new kind of extreme rationalism that separates such thought style from all fascist thought. However, the new rationalism ignores systematization. Thoughts are temporarily placed between "absurd feelings" and their understanding, art, and philosophy. Here, part of it: Camus refuses the existence of philosophy: the latter "interprets" the mysteries, streamlines ridiculous things, and distorts that reality. For him, the only complete performance lays a stupid life, while artistic creation rejects rationalization ("raisonner Ie concret") and covers up "nonsense ith image" ("Ce qui n" On the other hand, Sartre is trying to develop "experience" into a specific human existence philosophy: there is no appeal to explain the structure "in an absurd world" and "ethics of ethics" .

In recent decades, democratic election management institutions underwent major changes in the construction and operation of countries around the world. The birth of the election system of the new democratic country and the transformation of the old democracy have contributed to this broad trend. In many democratic electoral system changes, the number of distant political parties is increasing dramatically in niches competing for work in a particular election. The increase in population of these parties has created many interesting possibilities for party research, especially how these new parties deal with the mainstream party's old policies and strategies. For over 10 years, the discussion on the maximum revival has bothered free mainstream factions. There is no doubt that trends in elections have broadly benefited against opposition to the party's rights of the Democratic Party. But in Europe there is not a long-term breakthrough in the expected elections. The Australian election in 2016 and the final day forecast for the 2017 Dutch and French elections have not been achieved. However, the story of supernationalism, populism, anti-immigrants and terrorists who won more than 5 million votes in Germany has a more symbolic meaning. So far, the success of AfD is the most serious evidence, and is the chapter of postwar liberalism already on the spiral of death? Is there evidence that the legendary liberal consensus after the war is a noble but short-term one, not "the end of history" of victory? We are seeing the emergence of extremely right parties in the mainstream European politics. EU skeptics after the euro area and the use of racist rhetoric to exploit the uncontrollable immigration crisis, these parties are winning voters in continental countries. Below are the guidelines for the rebellious top 10 rebellious highest institutions (some new organizations, established organizations). The biggest election success in Europe: Since September 2016, Germany's AfD was represented by 10 of the 16 German Legislatures. Last year the anti-Islamic policy replaced the focus of skepticism in Europe and the slogan "Muslim is not part of Germany" was held at the party's spring meeting. The support rate has declined in recent months: AfD's voting result is 8%, its leaders Frauke Petry and JörgMeuthen said the AfD politician's speech stopped German Nazi sin's atonement Urged This year, the Austrian Liberal Party, the German Alternative Party (AfD) Party, and the Slovak People's Party gained significant benefits in the election. The other most partisan political parties, such as the Geert Wilders People's Liberal Party in the Netherlands, the People's Party of Denmark, Jobbik in Hungary, Golden Dawn in Greece, the National Front of France, have spread rapidly. The political parties of the European Parliament are organized by formal political groups and are cooperating in policy making and voting through them. The Conservative Party of England dominates the Conservative Party of Europe and the Reform Organization (ECR). It has become the third largest force in the European Parliament since the election in May 2014. In addition to the ECR Conservative Party, there are several very right-wing neo-Nazi compassionates.

David Hume's "miracle" in David Hume's paper? It is a miracle. Hume has advocated various arguments about why people should not trust any miracle. Hume does not believe that miracles do not exist, but do not believe it because there is no reasonable background. One of his arguments, by definition, miracle is incredible. And there is no reasonable way to believe in miracles. Another argument is that most miracles are often from undeveloped countries and witnesses often create conflicts of interest and oppose each other's experiences. Miraculous memory David Hume's "fairness about human understanding" is obvious, and he believes that no miracles will occur. Hume is a logical person who believes in knowledge experience. Of course, such people do not witness them, it is difficult to believe in extraordinary ideas. Especially when these events require a lot of faith. In order for the incident to be regarded as a miracle, it must violate the laws of nature. But, that is the same legal chief. David Hume devoted himself to part of his philosophy and tried to ignore his wrong assertion about the soul. In Hume's doubt, the German idealist began with Emmanuel Kant and left various cognitive and metaphysical problems. David Hume is an Scottish empiricist and became a philosopher for his metaphysical skepticism and explanation of his mind. Hume was born in the 18th century David Hume's "miracle" in David Hume's paper? miracle,? Hume has advocated various arguments about why people should not trust any miracle. Hume does not believe that miracles do not exist, but do not believe it because there is no reasonable background. One of his arguments, by definition, miracle is incredible. And there is no reasonable way to believe in miracles. Another argument is that most miracles often come from non-civilized interpretation or define miracles; miracles are violations of natural laws that are unusual for most people. When Hume said: "Nothing is considered a miracle, if it happened in a common process of nature, then he will explain this very clearly. A man that looks healthy will suddenly die It is not a miracle. "Hume, p. 888) Hume said that this death is abnormal, but it seems to happen naturally.

The Immortal Alliance with Abraham Lincoln has sworn at the office of the President of the United States, the country was divided deeply, and several states were separated from the Union and formed an alliance of the United States. He promised to "protect, preserve and defend its alliances destroyed and occupied by the Confederates and its Commonwealth fortress and property of the Navy" (Document # 1). In his speech, Lincoln promised that "any country can not legally leave the alliance" (document # 1) and will reaffirm the law of the Union in rebel faction power states. Siegfried quickly settled; his hands were firmly fixed to the board, forming an unbreakable association with the ship. Evaporated sweat came out of him as the mist flew from the lawn of sunrise; his tongue swollen, his mouth opened, his lips were pushed; his eyes are front and bottom Raging Wave Perhaps the meaning of Shihei's story is that permanent peace between states is an unachievable goal and Axl and Beatrice are anxious for an unbreakable alliance. But if you are not ready to accept this conclusion, the most important question is how to avoid violence and indignation that memory may encourage. At the international level, institutional erosion is the most obvious, along with the challenges facing the EU. The EU 's firm commitment to financial discipline has dramatically increased the skepticism of Europe in its member countries. And that eventually resulted in last month's Brexit referendum. In addition, the EU suffered serious damage due to a series of internal crises such as the Greek financial and economic crisis caused by the imminent crisis and the imminent collapse of the Schengen open boundary area. As the reality of war began to play its full role, the unbroken alliance in soldier 's class was strengthened. At such a desperate moment, each soldier's only remaining property is their fragile life and the unconditional relationship they share with each other. They need to overcome overwhelming war damage and learn to prosper one another in order to maintain physical and mental state. In All Quiet of the Western Front of Erich Maria Remarque, soldiers rely on emotional relaxation to substitute for their families, and physical dependence on the front line.

The United States is proceeding along the path of ancient Rome. There are many differences, but their similarities indicate a similar fate in the United States. My aim was to study the climate and structure of ancient Rome that brought about rapid success. And a similar system contributed to the rapid rise of the United States. By examining the results of this system, corruption and basic philosophy that brought the emergence of the "central government" of both countries and many countries that ended the Roman Republic era were presented. Historians have been fascinated by the decline of great civilizations like ancient Greece and Rome. But for human beings, no more important lessons, rather than the collapse of the United States which has finished the era of virtue invisible in the dark age, and not including autumn than the whole planet. Ultimately even before the birth of the country was released, it destroys the powers of the United States of philosophy. This proposition can also be understood and the sun will not rise tomorrow, "Make sure that it does not become more contradictory Meaning: His philosophical skepticism of David Hume 1748" Investigate human understanding, "I wrote it rises. So we need to waste to prove that falsehood. 1781 ", so I know that it denies knowledge to make room for the necessary faith," he writes the criticism of pure reason Immanuel Kant "he founded, the founding of the United States 5 Published later years For centuries the Roman Empire faced many challenges both inside and outside. Rome is adjacent to a more powerful country. The day of Rome collapse has room for debate. Historians also discovered various reasons. Some people think that the collapse of Rome is the beginning of the Middle Ages. In 184, the excellent emperor Marcus Orillus died. His son, Comodos, succeeded him who led the Treasury to bankruptcy. This is the beginning of the confusion of Rome. In 192 CE the army of Commodus assassinated him. Thanks to the ideal Emperor, the Imperial Armies also struck each other. Because of these internal wars repeated attacks by neighboring tribes succeeded. Probably Romans can protect themselves if they unite to fight enemies. The birth of many emperors in a few years shows the political instability of Rome and the division of its existence.

Aubrey Beardsley and Oscar Wilde Oscar Wilde insisted that he discovered Aubrey Beardsley when he asked him to explain Salome. However, many people insist on the same thing. Writer Robert Ross, on the other hand, believes that Beardsley is truly beginning to relate to his work forever. He is a collaborator of the Yellow Book. (Aubrey Beardsley, page 14). Aubrey was born on August 21, 1872, in Brighton, England. He is a quiet catch-up child of a middle-class family. In Britain, the main graphic artist of Art Nouveau style is Aubrey Beardsley (1872-1898). He began carving illustrations of Le Morte d'Arthur, followed by black and white illustrations made by Oscar Wilde (1893) for Salome made him famous. In the same year, he began making illustrations and posters for the art magazine The Studio to help promote European artists like British Fernand Khnopff. Curves and complex flower patterns gather attention as much as text For example, in 1895 portrait of Jack-Emile Blanche's Aubrey Vincent Beardsley, Beardsley showed a gorgeous pink flower on the jacket. Although Beardsley 's sexual orientation has not been confirmed yet, his portrait in his costume is a portrait of his esthetician Oscar and his friend who committed a crime of "he was drawn to another male official" We support Wild. He was imprisoned for being badly traumatized. In the coming years, aesthetics has become a public weapon. This is the essence of Andy Warhol 's work in the 1960' s. The artist changed the pictures of Elizabeth Taylor and Marilyn Monroe to a pop queen and added a strange twist to the mainstream image. As a gay person, Warhol provides space for homosexual audiences in the mainstream American gay languages. Sports that peaked in the 1890s - symbolism, decline and aesthetics, the most famous examples are Paris and Beardsley's MALALME, Toulouse Lautrec and Debussy, Charles Condor and British Oscar Wilde. These ideas and concerns - indeed, the influence of ideology - have been affecting the creation of modernism for decades. Expression does not refer to the change itself, but in this case, many people define it as the First World War, but that will come. Pessimism afflicts poets such as Conrad, Thomas Hardy, Matthew Arnold and TS Some of the reasons for Eliot were promoted by the decline of religious beliefs and evolutionists such as scientists, philosophers, and Darwin It is general skepticism.

Security and security Protecting the country: President Bush promises to maintain the strength and security of the country by strengthening the military, developing missile defense, strengthening the NATO alliance, and supporting military families and veterans. The President promises to promote independent democratic Iraq to ensure further stability of the Middle East and the whole world. Iraq's Victory Plan President Bush has a clear plan for Iraq's victory to first train Iraqi troops so that they can defend their country and fight terrorists. On March 19th George W Bush officially launched the so-called Will Alliance, the "Iraq Freedom Movement", which supported the US invasion of Iraq and dismissed President Saddam Hussein. group. Skepticism Bush declared that Hussein had a weapons of mass destruction and took a prudent attitude of taking part in another war stimulated the protest action. When a large gathering gathered more than 3 million protesters in Rome, the largest anti-war race so far, the anger of the masses before the invasion steadily grew in a few months. The invasion of Iraq has triggered an anti - war movement not seen since the Vietnam War. Let's talk about the beginning of Middle Eastern invasion. The lie of Iraq has started a war with terrorism. Notorious "Saddam Hussein has weapons of mass destruction" This is also planned by Tony Blair a year ahead of schedule when President George W. Bush became known by Hillary Clinton 's e - mail. Next is President Barack Obama, what happened. According to Obama, government MISOC publicity and imitation birds can legitimize publicity under NDAA, detain US citizens without jury or trial, and further expand the monitoring situation. Until Edward Snowden, NSA's information provider, leaks the stage capacity to carefully monitor the country. President Obama 's term of office was revealed by the existence of CIA' s Black Torture Prison. Mr Obama's war covers the first and the first years of Mr. Barack Obama's term and details on how young and inexperienced President George W. Bush faced war in Iraq and Afghanistan I am stating. What was handed down was a conspiracy between the military and politics, a conspiracy between Washington and Afghanistan, and politicians in the Pakistan region. The negotiations and discussions detailed in the book, unlike the typical internal situation of the organization, are high risk and intense. After reading this insightful book and spending a large part of the week I thought about ways to apply the war strategy lessons on the page directly to solve important business problems. I soon aimed to associate these courses with general plans and presentations in most organizations. This course is inexhaustible, but I chose 7 special courses.

The appearance of "Hamlet" is the story of a young prince compared to the reality, and he must decide the truth about the death of his father. Through script, the basic theme of appearance and reality is constant. Most of the main character is hidden behind the lie and camouflage, hiding the truth, so there is little real self-visibility. Because the fraud maze is badly distorted, only Hamlet knows the truth, as the ghosts of his father revealed this to him. Because reality, fantasy, appearance and deception in Shakespeare's "Hamlet" plays an important role in today's society due to its appearance, they also play an important role in William Shakespeare's play "Hamlet" Fulfill. From the first scene to the last scene, Shakespeare explains the theme of appearance and reality through plot and character. Play conspiracy is full of events and events, and these events and events are not. One of the things is the death of Ophelia. Regardless of whether it is dressed during Halloween or as a character in a drama or movie, usually one of the appearance and reality pretends to be someone else. Shakespeare used the concept of camouflage in his "Hermitage". The second theme of the theater is the appearance and reality. Through the drama, things will not seem to make them see. Catherine seems to be genuine, but it completely masks the damage she felt. Bianca is like a self-sacrificial angel Please help me with this work. "MLM of appearance and reality," William Shakespeare's "Hamlet" in "Hamlet" has revealed a consistent theme of apparent and reality in the overall role behavior. In many cases, but it seems so that there is sincerity and honesty, in fact, dishonesty and deception is usually the true intentions of personality. Specifically, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern, Hamlet and Claudius proved a discontinuity between appearance and reality. In the play, these characters The appearance of "Hamlet" is one of the central themes of Shakespeare's "Hamlet". The role of role in the play is the role of the hidden character - in fact the murderer and looter Claudius plays a role of sad brother and legitimate king, in her son's view Gertrude's Adultery plays a role she is the "most harmful woman" who plays the role of "the most beautiful queen". Even Hamlet himself played a crazy role in his attempt. Philosophical problems in Bertrand Russell's "appearance and reality" The approach to his subject in Bertrand Russell's "philosophical problems" involves Descartes' fundamental skepticism, in which the author cancels all previous assumptions It was. Certain reality and existence. In the first chapter, Russell 's quest for reality in reality compared to reality starts with observation of his surroundings. For example, I checked the form and he confirmed it

William Shakespeare: Hamlet Background / Comment: Most of Shakespeare's work is fictitious, otherwise they are all based on Shakespeare's old story, but there are many twists and turns Shakespeare's works are drama It has a shape. It is written in. Contrary to past novels and short stories, Shakespeare's teaching method is to use dramas as a class to read and play dramas in an important scene, but I still fully understand most or all of Shakespeare's old English I have not. Consideration on what happened in the story (Story plot) In my opinion, I think that an ongoing journal will be an ideal teaching method. William Shakespeare's "Hamlet" focuses on the hero's struggle to find absolute certainty in an unstable world. Hamlet reflects the importance of the ideology and context of the Elizabethan era, but his dramatic quest for this struggle continues to resonate with modern audiences. Through the use of dramatic techniques Shakespeare uses Hamlet's pessimistic character as a medium to reveal the tension between Christian doctrine and human philosophy and is unique to the chain interruption kingdom of the Elizabethan era We will explore moral ambiguity and uncertainty. It began to appear during the Renaissance. In the final analysis, it was that Hamlet's meditative essence, psychic superstition and the skepticism of the Renaissance made a dramatic suspense that retarded his revenge and had attracted viewers for centuries. It is a general confrontation. In many respects, the role actor in "Hamlet" reflects the social microcosm, Hamlet, young prince and Ophelia, the young people representing society and Hamlet's father, Gertrude, Claudius and Wave Lonius' s illusion Representing social status and cultural tradition, it stimulates continuous lies. From the beginning of the play, Shakespeare wrote the following exaggeration between Bernardo and Horatio with his amazing subtle ambiguity: Bernardo said, What is Horatio? Oslik is the reflection or shadow of Hamlet. Hamlet said, "To know people, you must know yourself", but he acknowledged the crime of knowing the Osrik. Osrik has a rich land - Hamlet is an heir in the cemetery. The king wants to bet on the head of Hamlet - Hamlet wants to wear a hat on the head of Oslick. Ophelia sang Hamlet's hat (shellfish). Oslik ran out of "the shell above the head". The old king commanded Hamlet to remember - Hamlet told him to remember it to Oslec. Oslik's purse is empty and all golden words are used. The wallet with Hamlet's father's seal becomes finally empty at last - he is ready to keep silent

This paper critically examines Hume's assertion on knowledge / existence of substantial ideas. This denial is rooted in his epistemology, which is based on the theory that complicated thinking lacking a corresponding impression is created by three relations, imagination, memory, and impression, three relationships, similarity, continuity, and a constant connection includes. The key to my criticism is to point out that these relationships are such that only unified agents over the long term can interact with them in a way to explain them in a hurry. David Hume Hume, David, 1711-76, Scottish philosopher, and historian. Hume brings empiricalism of John Rock and George Berkeley to the logical extremes of fundamental skepticism. He denied the possibility of certain kinds of knowledge and found a series of emotions in his mind and believed that the causal relationship in nature was entirely from B's introduction. The answer to the theme is drawn by the time committee named as illusion by David Hume, and the time committee named human by himself. In the era of modern philosophy, when the influence of Descartes was still important, David Hume brought the argument of killing the Descartes I created and skipping it like a ghost in human perception. You can see not only the theme but also the contrast between Hume and Descartes. Our recognition and memory The famous philosophers David Hume and Rene Descartes are those who are looking for answers and definitions of individual identity. Both of them considered their ideas and issued two different conclusions. Some people think that individual identity can not be understood, but others confirm that their certainty is their thinking and cognitive ability. David Hume begins discussing personal identity by denying this David Hume is studying physical and mental problems. Hume also investigated the person's character, the relationship between humans and animals, and the nature of the agent. Hume pointed out that we tend to think we are the same person five years ago. We have changed in various ways, but the same person appears there. You can start thinking about which functions can be changed without changing the fundamental self. However, Hume denies that there are differences between the various features of people and the magical self that is said to have these characteristics. "In addition to specific awareness, we will never pay close attention to anything - human beings are turning at incredible speed, a bunch or collection of different cognitions in constant flow and movement "

Institutional investors worldwide have always played an important role in the financial sector. They played an important role in the global financial crisis in 2007 and 2008. In various economies, institutional investors are investing heavily in equity funds. Elimination of major institutional investors from the stock market is a major problem of the global financial crisis in 2007 and 2008. According to Weissman (2011), the financial crisis is characterized by declining corporate profits in all industries, declining asset prices, and withdrawal of institutional investor assets from equity funds. The economic and financial crisis of 2008 - 2009, also known as the global financial crisis, is considered the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression. The overall picture of the financial market has become more complicated by the introduction of new financial products and different operational modes including globalization. The global financial markets appear to play a variety of roles in the economy and have played a part in new regulations. The introduction of a new trading platform, online access to information, integration and market globalization brought about a review of several financial theories. What are the reliable predictors of the economic and financial crisis? Please describe the outcome and unresolved issues in the global crisis. Are we still in danger of economic and financial problems today? Question: The 2008-2009 economic and financial crisis, also known as the global financial crisis In the global financial crisis, a new paper on journalism research focused on mainstream newspapers in the United States, the UK and Australia during the 2008 global financial crisis. According to the newspaper, the mainstream financial media "generally do not issue warnings, lack sufficient skepticism when reporting finance and economic trends, journalists are closer to sources of information used to obtain information Too much. " Poverty, a study by Media & Jornalismo published at the Media and Journalism Research Center at Coimbra University in Portugal, reports that Western news media frequently reports poverty performance such as famine, overcrowding and natural disasters, but "poverty is" emergency The problem, "the reporter says,

Descartes 'Second Arbitration - Wax Art In Descartes' s second mediation, the two philosophical ideologies, including empiricists and rationalists, are opposite each other. Experiences believe in knowledge through experience, but rationalists believe in knowledge gained from logic. Descartes uses the concept and concept of "wax" to understand what the reality of wax is. It is truly wax. How do you know that wax disappears like wax, smells the same, or can not feel the same way? In the third mediation of René Descartes's "First Philosophy Mediation" (entitled "About the existence of God"), Descartes established the principle of whatever is clearly recognizable by natural light. It is all true, and we use it to establish the existence of God. In meditation, 2 Descartes decides his real existence (after paying attention to meditation). In meditation, Descartes pointed out that he knew that he had ideas about God in his mind and asked why he thought about it. For Descartes, a business must have as much reality as reality. Since Descartes and other limited existence are less restrictive than the reality of God, only God can cause God's thought (see the summary of another God's proof of Descartes). This means that Descartes must exist in God. If God does not exist, Descartes will wonder if he can exist with his idea about God. So God must exist to be the reason for our existence. Descartes was skeptical at the first two mediation. Descartes first solves radical skepticism implied by an evil devilish argument by deciding that he is intellectual essence. According to Descartes, this "I" self-view is born, we are born, even a demon can not be doubted. Second argument about the existence of God. Because Descartes believes that existence is perfect, it can become a predicate to God. First, I will explain what the ontological argument of the existence of God is. Next, I will explain why Descartes decided to incorporate God into his philosophical approach. As a predicate of God existence reveals some truth about God. Ontology seeks to prove the existence of God from a transcendental point of view The basic premise of Descartes' second ontology theory is simple. The essence of God is that he is the best being. To exist is one of God's completion. Therefore, God must exist. Descartes believes that if God does not exist, he can not think about God in his head. All faith in God rests on the fact that he is perfect. Descartes said that he can not think about God in other ways. God must exist because he can not regard God as absent. The concept of God is a perfect being and is perfect in every infinite aspect and exist must exist to be one of his accomplishments. After that, the discussion of Descartes was only God's reflection to prove the existence of God. 5th meditation at essay.com / Descartes In this article we will provide insight into Descartes' fifth meditation and the existence of God. Descartes '5th meditation This article provides insight into Descartes' fifth meditation and the existence of God.

Throughout history, there were many influential people, events, and times that have made a great contribution to the society we know today. Many of them contribute to cultural, industrial or territorial conflicts that define our border. Unlike the world war that created these boundaries in the past few years, the age of enlightenment gives way of thinking to the world, gives how they see their own individual society, the world and the government bring new perspectives It was. Age of Enlightenment is an age of scientific awakening, and Age of Enlightenment is mainly developed in France. The starting point of enlightenment is John Rock's book on human understanding. Enlightenment attacked the leaders of the church and focused on the problems that had been avoided in the past. Trying to challenge the church takes courage. As the Church said, enlightenment questioned people such as "Earth is the center of the universe". There are four major areas of transformation: religion, intellectuals, economics, and politics. From the Middle Ages to Enlightenment and the 19th century, along with enlightenment and the 19th century, the evolution of knowledge has changed drastically. From the 17th century to the 18th and 19th centuries, the age of enlightenment was thought to be a cultural movement of intellectuals. It also began spreading to American colonies on continental Europe. This is by purpose https://www.studymode.com/subjects/which-labels-for-the-middle-ages-best-describe-the-era-between-500-and-1400-in-europe-the-dark-ages- Europe's most faithful, or oldest feudal age of the golden era - page 1. Html "The labels of the Middle Ages best describe the European Dark Ages from 500 to 1400, or the feudalism era of the European Golden Age," theses and research papers Okay, men and girls, ready to enlightenment In this lesson I will introduce enlightenment. what is that? Enlightenment, sometimes called the era of enlightenment, was an intellectual movement from the late 17th century to the early 18th century, emphasizing reasons, individualism, and skepticism. Enlightenment challenged the traditional religious view. Because that was such a wide movement, enlightenment did not have an accurate start date. It did not pop up, but it gradually developed. Most historians came to the beginning of enlightenment from the mid 17th century to the beginning of the 18th century. The work of intellectuals like Rene Descartes, Barus Spinoza, Isaac Newton is particularly important for the creation of enlightenment.

What is morality? This problem has bothered philosophers over the years. Is it possible to have a common ethical view? There are many questions surrounding the mystery of morality. They seem to promote every action we take. Our decision is based on right and wrong. But what exactly is it to judge what is right and what is wrong? Is this our reasonable consciousness? This is our emotion. This is a question that David Hume has been thinking about most of his life. What is the driving force of our actions? Hume's main moral sentence is the third volume of his humanitarian discourse, "ethical" (Vol. 2, "in passion"), the quest for his moral principles, and some of his essays is. To some extent, an ethical investigation reinterprets the central idea from the ethical part of the essay in a more meaningful way; however, there are some important differences. The ethical position and discussion of this paper are as follows, show the place where the ethics survey coincides, then discuss the difference between the survey and this thesis. A study on Hum's morality began with a paper and refined in his "Exploring the Moral Principle" (1751). His view of morality is that "verbal decision is based on moral sentiment". It does not know how to manage ethical behavior, but about feelings. The moral sentimental rhythm of Hume's morality is shared by his best friend Adam Smith, but Hume and Smith are moral reflections of their former contemporary Francis Hutchinson. It is generally affected. Peter Singer argues that Hume's argument can not have rational grounds only with morality. It is enough to give him a position in moral history. Hume's moral philosophy and his historical and religious work reflect his theoretical empiricism. In the investigation of Part 3 of this article and ethical principles, Hume defines moral judgment as a specific type of recognition that is consistent with promoting practicality or pleasant quality or behavior, and is recognized by most people. In his ambitious British history, Hume tried to completely transcend his predecessor by emphasizing attention to details, fairness, and wise attention. However, many critics pointed out that history is characterized by a strong prejudice against Hoggs, especially at the later curls, they are obsessed with the British attitude towards Scotland. Hume practices religious skepticism in works like extensive dialogue on "miracles" and natural religions.

Hume began to be skeptical about the operation of understanding. He said that there are two types of human understanding (only one of which contains a real or definitive investigation he knows about us). Mr. Hume said that all human reasoning skills can be divided into two types: ideological relations and fact issues. Intellectual relationship is the knowledge of science and mathematics. They are essential and can be proved without experience like Pythagorean theorem. I just thought that talking about the cause of faith and the influence of faith is different from talking about faith for Hume. But is this correct? Let's first consider the problem of influence. Does Hume likely incorporate the influence of faith into its definition? According to this objection, perfect and clear recognition is not necessarily a belief, but only a vivid awareness that has had some influence is a belief. However, it seems that Hume did not. For example, in the "Influence of Faith" section, Hume said, "It will lead to the idea of ​​imitating the impact of the impression, so we need to resemble them within these qualities, and a strong concept" ( T 119-20). Even if he said that his belief would have an impact, Hume said that "I am just" a vivid concept. When discussing the interpretation of the causal relationship of Hume, its effect is explained in this relation. Hume explains the causal relationship in causality such as thinking, necessity, skepticism and so on. These three points explain the peak of Hume's causal theory. When discussing ideas, we must consider the fact that ideas range from the challenge of death to inspiration. For example, when Hume discussed ideology, he referred to the golden mountain. "When we think of golden mountains, we will combine only two unanimous ideas, gold and mountain, all of our thoughts or weak ideas are our impressions or a more vivid impression." As long as there is an idea there is a complex thought process reflecting whether the idea is beneficial or insignificant. What are these ideas yet "What if?" Usually comes from the causal relationship of specific ideas. What if he was arrested?

The theory of knowledge to write the distribution "There is nothing to know certainly"; is this description correct? Is it OK? In this article, we show that there is nothing to be done, we study the truth and certainty of life and humanity, and prove that there is no certainty. Sir Isaac Newton proposed many theories of time and space. Euclid said that there may be a straight line concept, but Newton said that it can not go straight, see the picture below. I like quotes above Cesare Pavese. For the past four years, he is on a business trip and has been nailed to the site. There is nothing to be sure. There is nothing immutable. Friends get in and out, traffic declines and technology disappoints us at the end of the day. No matter how bad your day is. On the other hand, Lawrence Block talks about the spontaneity of travel and how we should be open to these things. My trip style with my partner is totally different. He is a more voluntary traveler and I do not like to plan something. As you can imagine, I am crazy because I want to know if I have a place to sleep tonight. After traveling together for nearly three years, we compromised and we met on the way along the way. When I acknowledge nothing is certain, I think that it must also be acknowledged that something is more certain than anything else. It is almost certain that we have gathered here tonight is better than this party and that party. Of course, there is some confidence. Otherwise it will be entirely skeptical and people will have to emphasize this fact very carefully, as complete skepticism will of course be completely irrational and completely useless. Anyone who is not a madman will agree. Live more than death, feed more than starvation, and it is easier to live than a slave. Many people want these things only for themselves and their friends; they are very satisfied with their enemies to suffer. These people can only be refuted by science: human beings have become families, and we can not guarantee our own prosperity unless we guarantee others

Because you are the right person of the planet of mankind (what is human rights?), You have the right to do so. These rights were born to us. When asked what my human rights are, I did not have a word. I do not know how to answer this question, it sounds simple at that time. I forgot the question confused me, but it was made after six months since the sarcastic confusion I gained the work of UN Declaration of Human Rights. What is human rights? Human rights is to reveal that certain philosophical or moral standards regulate human behavior and are often restricted to the legitimate rights of national and international law. Regardless of human rights, it is an inherent right for all, instead of our nationality, color, sex, place of residence, nationality and ethnicity, religion, language and other circumstances. We have the right to understand human rights without discrimination. These rights are interrelated and interdependent The political concept of human rights provides the concept of human rights. At least, modern human rights are important at national and international levels. While denying moral skepticism, the political concept of human rights, in many cases, the defenders unconcious of the universal author's moral rights, and that norms and normative roles are rational for the content of human rights We may provide evidence. John Rawls introduced the concept of human rights law into his book "Human Law" (Rolls 1999). The basic idea is that by judging the main role of human rights in a specific political field, you can understand the way of human rights and necessary things. In People's Law, international relations (national politics continue). There is controversy over what basic human rights are, but most people realize that there is certain basic rights to others. Human Rights Declaration of Human Rights, Rights to Life, Freedom and Security "Human Rights Including" "... ... ... ... enough to live to pursue and enjoy asylum from persecution in other countries According to the standard ... ... Freedom of expression of property and opinion ...... ... ... ... ... thought education, conscience and religion; from torture and decomposition processing We own the right to freedom. "

Thanks to enlightenment, the 18 th century was a key change point in the history of Europe. Voltaire was a revolutionary actor who promoted religious freedom, scientific thinking, skepticism and experience philosophy using his ideas to attack the established Catholic church. Voltaire was born in 1694 and belonged to the Louis XIV group. At that time, nobility ruled France extremely, most civilians suffered from poverty. In his classic reflection on the French Revolution, Edmund Burke believed religion as the basis of civil society order. The famous enlightenment philosopher Voltaire believes that society can not fulfill its role without theology; in order to preserve the moral social order, people are asking "the thought of their brains and the Creator Remember deeply "Alexis de Tocqueville also believes that religious beliefs are" essential "for a functioning society. It is considered "natural enemy". "Social harmony "Candide or Optimism" translated into romantic Voltaire by enlightenment poetry "Candide" was written in Age of Enlightenment. Voltaire's story was published in "Norton Western Literature Collection". The role of Voltaire Panglos is a philosopher who teaches the Almighty God who created the world. Pangloss said that the world must be of God, because he is the only Holy Creator. Pangolss is also a mentor of Candide, the protagonist of the novel. Frankness is very good ... Voltar's novel, frankness includes many things. This includes ridiculeing the beliefs of philosophers who conflict during enlightenment. But perhaps the most powerful satiric work in his novel is religion. Voltaire believed in God, but strong opposition to religion. He believes that should not be taught how to believe God through religious officials, but everyone should serve God in their own way. Voltaire's frankness The frankness reflects the philosophical value of enlightenment. Voltaire's novelistic work satirized the ideology of the former regime, criticizing the political, social and religious ideals of the time. A common feature of enlightenment is anti-feudalism. Philosophers oppose the separation of the old regime and promote equality among people. - The rustic hero of Candide and the Forrest Gump Society may be damaged in various ways. In our lives, we are affected by corruption within religion, moral corruption, and government corruption, but not limited to them. Frank writer Voltaire and "Forest Gump" director Robert Zemeckis use a grotesque rustic hero to explain their view of the world in which they live.

Wax, hair, bone, stone, ice, lead. These are some materials, assumptions and revisions, beliefs and doubts among the works of art that Carrie Lambert - Beatty discusses in this lecture. This theme pretends to allow audiences to practice the state of various beliefs, with her artistic and experimental terminology. A way for musicians to practice the scale. Its background is historical to the transition from skepticism alleged by official truth to the inner era of progressive politics, to the era of widespread sarcasticism and creation of allegations that threaten democracy and the earth itself It is a cultural change. Lambert-Beatty explores contemporary art and new intellectual politics using fantasy artists of artists such as Iris Häussler, Dario Robleto, Yes Men and Walid Raad. Discussion (82) on "the air attached to the imaginary laboratory, the artist wearing the white coat, and the audience passing through their maze" is also an epistemology (science, the generation of facts, and ultimately The "fictional" fictional art is also the emergency of emotion: even if she explained "laboratory air" in this context, it makes me feel cold - that is the climate we are in. Other The interesting point of Massumi's interest in aphasia (deliberately echoed and very different from structural obsession with aphasia), and of course dildo tectonics. "Roundtable meeting" that mixes news, anthropology and art presents musical "fiction" about food. (Truth experiments of truth through destruction and overturning create possibilities by creating acceptable alternatives for truth, faith, discourse, and ideology). Camille Jeanjean (Paris, 1989) is a freelance writer (French press card). She graduated from the Iscom Institute in Paris, researching new media and journalism. She has lived in Beirut, Lebanon, Brazil for two and a half years and is working on a local magazine. Her interest is to create a new story with digital art, music, light and technology. Exercise and immigration stimulate her, she always goes to a place of change. With this residence, she can try the intersection of art and news. In the novel, real and / or imaginary characters and stories intersect the world of life. After the simulation, the fictitious strategy is more suitable for the real disappearance than the trusted word theory. In short, these novels are as de facto experience for these degrees of success, different periods, and for various purposes. At one point they realized the state of truth for some people. (54-56) First, use of pseudonymity by pseudonym in the form of "group" (can be considered as a condition of historical novels), secondly, use of documentary as an index mark and pure culture form. (33-4, original focus)

Enlightenment awareness was the growth of ideas of European thinkers of the 1600s. The spread of enlightenment was the result of the scientific revolution of the 1500s and 1600s. Therefore, rationality is necessary to distribute human rights. It is also coming from the need to tackle social, political and economic issues. Joseph Priestley and Antoine Lavoisier established a modern chemistry framework with Enlightenment. Edward Jenner established a vaccine against smallpox which is a fatal disease. Ekhtiar, Rochelle Suzette. "Enlightenment Novel: Eastern Story of the 18th Century England" 1985, Brandeis University. This study focuses on politics, ethics and social education and examines British Oriental novels in the context of European enlightenment. Investigating the relationship with enlightenment throughout Europe reveals many of its ideological problems shared with other forms of 18th century prose. The image of the oriental of Europe (here restricted to the Middle East) is a complex structure of European thinking. During the Enlightenment Period, we can go back to the middle of the 18th century, mainly about changes in European cultural worldview. The term "enlightenment" means a series of changes in European thinking and writing. When writers, philosophers, and scientists of the 18th century called their activities enlightenment, they broke the past and replaced ambiguity, darkness, and ignorance of European thought with "light of truth" It meant that. Thanks to enlightenment, the 18 th century was a key change point in the history of Europe. Voltaire was a revolutionary actor who promoted religious freedom, scientific thinking, skepticism and experience philosophy using his ideas to attack the established Catholic church. Voltaire was born in 1694 and belonged to the Louis XIV group. At that time, nobility dominated France in an extreme way, and most civilians

Hume's mental game Human thought is a very complex machine. There have been a lot of attempts to explain how human thinking works, but it has not been successful. After reading Hume I agree with many of the things he explained. In my opinion, Hume is the closest thing to exposing thought. Robert Hume handled much of what Decarte spoke of in his work. The difference between Decarte and Hume is that Hume "resolves" many of the "wrinkles" left by Decarte. David Hume Hume, David, 1711-76, Scottish philosopher, and historian. Hume brings empiricalism of John Rock and George Berkeley to the logical extremes of fundamental skepticism. He denied the possibility of certain kinds of knowledge and found a series of emotions in his mind and believed that the causal relationship in nature was entirely from B's introduction. The answer to the theme is drawn by the time committee named as illusion by David Hume, and the time committee named human by himself. In the era of modern philosophy, when the influence of Descartes was still important, David Hume brought the argument of killing the Descartes I created and skipping it like a ghost in human perception. You can see not only the theme but also the contrast between Hume and Descartes. Our recognition and memory The famous philosophers David Hume and Rene Descartes are those who are looking for answers and definitions of individual identity. Both of them considered their ideas and issued two different conclusions. Some people think that individual identity can not be understood, but others confirm that their certainty is their thinking and cognitive ability. David Hume begins discussing personal identity by denying this

Art has long been a forum for expressing views on political and social situations. Through manga, satire, symbolism, fables, artists commented clearly and destructively everything from vanity and excess to corruption and greed, and fascinated all people from unnamed people to privileged elites. The ability to create meaningful chords of these images which are widespread through printmaking and other reproducible media and to leave a lasting impression is the ability to keep the artist's political satire a dangerous terrain, in particular the dictatorship of the authoritarian regime Endanger the people living under the administration. For art and artist now, both their own media and expressions seem to have more essential needs, desires, and driving force. It may be a good time to reinvest our art as a means to educate the whole body and mind. Go see some art The artistic tradition comes from the critical design of the artistic tradition and has traditionally been used as a means of commenting on our social, cultural, political and environmental assumptions and practices, Dunne's privilege makes sense. But Dunn warns that art often causes alienation. Alienation is not a problem because it is difficult or impossible to misunderstand it. Shortly after key design began to increase momentum as a sub-area, Sengers et al. Representing reflective design as a generic name of design practice is aimed at supporting the continuous critical reflection of designers and users on technology and its relationship with human life experience. An example of a reflective design is Gaver et al. 'S sensor - based home health astrology system, resulting from skepticism about whether a sensor - based system can accurately represent people' s happiness. Art as a form of creation and expression often conveys political information. Political information conveyed through art can be direct or contextual. In the former case, the overall political and social development inevitably affects the work of artists. In other cases, artists only express their views of specific problems and events through their work. In communicating political information in the form of opposition, rejection, or accusation, art turns into resistance and eventually turns into a rebellion. As Albert Camus said, when art becomes rebellious and artists become rebellious, a new consciousness "battle of rebellion, consciousness" is born.

Hume began to be skeptical about the operation of understanding. He said that there are two types of human understanding (only one of which contains a real or definitive investigation he knows about us). Mr. Hume said that all human reasoning skills can be divided into two types: ideological relations and fact issues. Intellectual relationship is the knowledge of science and mathematics. They are essential and can be proved without experience like Pythagorean theorem. I just thought that talking about the cause of faith and the influence of faith is different from talking about faith for Hume. But is this correct? Let's first consider the problem of influence. Does Hume likely incorporate the influence of faith into its definition? According to this objection, perfect and clear recognition is not necessarily a belief, but only a vivid awareness that has had some influence is a belief. However, it seems that Hume did not. For example, in the "Influence of Faith" section, Hume said, "It will lead to the idea of ​​imitating the impact of the impression, so we need to resemble them within these qualities, and a strong concept" ( T 119-20). Even if he said that his belief would have an impact, Hume said that "I am just" a vivid concept. When discussing the interpretation of the causal relationship of Hume, its effect is explained in this relation. Hume explains the causal relationship in causality such as thinking, necessity, skepticism and so on. These three points explain the peak of Hume's causal theory. When discussing ideas, we must consider the fact that ideas range from the challenge of death to inspiration. For example, when Hume discussed ideology, he referred to the golden mountain. "When we think of golden mountains, we will combine only two unanimous ideas, gold and mountain, all of our thoughts or weak ideas are our impressions or a more vivid impression." As long as there is an idea there is a complex thought process reflecting whether the idea is beneficial or insignificant. What are these ideas yet "What if?" Usually comes from the causal relationship of specific ideas. What if he was arrested?

Sanches, Richard Dokey of Richard Dokey of the short story "Sanches" details the life of immigrant farmer Juan Sanches. Juan Sanches' life is very difficult and challenging. He witnessed that one of his children was stillborn and that fetus was torn from his wife's uterus. Juan's wife died during the birth of Jesus, his only son. After the suffering and suffering of the fans, everything that lived to make my son grow and become an industrious person became an American, the situation of his son Juan Sun is very depressed, but the fan Is also very depressed for his own situation and life. The reputation of Portuguese philosopher and medical writer Francisco Sanchez (1551-1623) largely depends on one of the most systematic details of philosophical skepticism in the 40th century (Quod nihil scitur, No Nothing Isown, 1581). This paper contains fundamental criticism of Aristotle's scientific concept, but in addition to its important goal, it has constructive goals that later generations tend to ignore. Philosophy and scientific investigation method. This method should be explained in another book. This book is lost, unpublished, or not written at all. As a tribute to old video games and the greatest scientists in history, the team of Superinteressante magazine in Brazil has developed a game called Science Kombat. The art and animator of this project Diego Sanches invites and rejuvenes a lot of scientists we all know and love. Many of them are Charles Darwin and Albert Einstein - check out their unique fight movement here! In commemoration of the 88th Academy Awards, Levente Szabó was asked to produce a series of posters for the British Film and Television Arts Academy. Szabó announced five posters depicting the candidates for the Best Film Division. His expertise in Adobe Photoshop indicates that you can use various brushes and layers to develop visual perception of your movie! Please check out other candidates here! Richard Dawkins is Kenville's atheist answer. Both are biologists who want to become philosophers, not philosophers. Both of us fell in love with Charles Darwin and his theory of evolution. Both of them hope that their discipline will be the answer to all the mysteries of the universe. Therefore, both ended with two versions of biologicalism (two versions of social Darwinism). They are both sides of the same coin. Please refer to my article Richard Dawkins 'criticism and suspicion investigation committee (CSI) and Ken Wilber' s critique and its integration method.

Metaphysics in the rehabilitation of Kant and Hume, Kant read David Hume, he said, "I made him awake from his dogmatic sleep.Life problems and prejudice This furthermore Kant is his own metaphysics I urged Hume to reply in the analysis of the theory Kant does not think that Hume can cope with these problems appropriately, in particular to solve the problem of whether Hume is feasible as science Decide to avoid places where Hume is located. After the break, the philosopher Emmanuel Conde started reforming metaphysics. Kant believes that metaphysics is impossible if Hume is right. However, Kant did not want to give way to Hume 's skepticism, so Kant began to criticize the possibility to explore and reform metaphysics. Kant began to criticize the quest for 'transcendental' knowledge in philosophy. Kant began looking for the "transcendental" principle that can reasonably be inferred to explain why he thinks it can not be detected. Kant believes that the only way we can get the necessary and universal thing is through 'a priori'. Kant found that the notion of causality is not the only concept to understand things 'a priori' but the metaphysics confirmed to consist completely of these concepts. (8) "Prolegomena", Kant said he had read David Hume, "let him awake from an arbitrary sleep." This is a study of Hum's human understanding, which allows Kant to recognize the problems and prejudices of life that he had not previously realized. It further encouraged Kant to answer Hume in his own analysis of metaphysical theory. Kant does not believe that Hume can cope with these problems appropriately, and decides to avoid the place where Hume is located, in particular to solve the problem of whether Hume is possible as science . Kant answered Hume's question directly in metaphysical analysis. Hume stopped thinking and was skeptical of the existence of metaphysics as science, and Kant accepted it. He continues to analyze the effectiveness of metaphysics as science and power in our lives. Talking about other people who can trust in the field of science, such as Copernicus, Kant developed a new way to observe the world. But like Hume, Kant encountered obstacles and could not find a solution.

The historical black movie Noir of the movie literally means "black movie". Originally created by French film critic Nino Frank, he noticed that many American movies constitute a dark trend of the theme of wartime movies. The classic film 'Black' during World War II and the postwar period of the 1940s was developed using skepticism about the anxiety after the war, pessimism, and the spirit of the times. It is obvious that blacks are making distrust, fear, delusions, and desolation, reflecting the Cold War era in which the threat of nuclear destruction continues. Interested in the history of black movies is the role of Arthur Fellig, also known as "famous Weegee". During the ban of murder, suicide, poor man, rogue, strike, prostitute etc, he traversed the city of Manhattan's Lower East Side using a 5 x 4 tablet camera, flash, police scanner, so Weegee really It was a pedestrian of the first night. Weegee is a self-taught photographer who is said to play the role of "photo scraper" in several development rooms in New York City. Through contact with a rogue like Lucky Luciano, he quickly purged off the crime, shot in the field, and sell his work to the city's most expensive tabloid magazine. Many critics call the movie itself the type itself, but others think that it may not be the case. Black movies are often related to the urban environment, but as many classic black movies are done in small towns, suburbs, rural areas or public roads, setting the type like Western can not. Likewise, private eyes and Fam women are traditionally black labeled character types, but most black movies are not. Therefore, like an illegal movie, no character base is specified in this genre. Black movies are not dependent on strange elements of horror movies, supernatural elements, speculative jumps in science fiction movies, musical songs and dance shows.

Many philosophers are proving how knowledge human beings have and knowledge. Kant, Rock, and Descartes took different positions and piloted points. For example, Descartes believes certainty comes from human reason, but Locke believes that all certainty comes from human experience. Kant combines these two theories and points out that both rationality and experience are necessary for certainty. All three arguments are valid, but I personally think that Kant's view is the strongest. Both Rock and Descartes' discussions are going down a little. Most epistemological theories are not purely reasonable as Descartes. In addition, although the influence of Kant is enormous, contemporary theorists do not accept the concept of synthesizing prior knowledge based on Kant's transcendental idealism. Nevertheless, many epistemologists believe that naturalistic resources can not cope with skepticism and fundamental problems of the nature of cognitive defense well. Or they believe they can cope only through questions like these resources appealing. On the other hand, Naturalists argue that there is nothing in transcendental epistemology. Unless epistemology is entirely based on the practice of scientific exploration and the results obtained thereby, it is totally different from evidence and strategy which is the only evidence that can be proved or confirmed eventually. There are few that Kant can break the position as one of the most influential moral theorists of the present age. But Kant took a break and started racist anthropology. Kant accepted the appearance of multiple bodies. Kant argues that in a hierarchical order of human kind, only white people can get voluntary and complete moral and rational ability - a real person -. Kant's moral equality principle applies only to Caucasians, so there is a quantitative limit. His excellence has deeply rooted these ideas into the classification of mankind until the 20th century. (Kant 's racist racism is now abnormal as it attracts some academic attention.)

Unidentified flying object UFO UFO is an unidentified flying object. Many people think that they are small cuisines by seeing things in the sky, but others have various opinions, but to be honest, various kinds of UFOs suddenly rise during the day To do. They insist on the many lights illuminated from these hovering objects, so they are most common at night. The doctor says there are many different reasons to claim that people saw these 'flying saucers'. One of the complaints often raised by UFO as skepticism of objective physical phenomena is the way to study the nature of UFO data and UFO. These complaints are based on specific scientific views and their data and do not necessarily apply to phenomena like UFOs. This does not mean that UFO is not suitable for scientific research. That simply means that the way you work in one area of ​​science does not fit in another. [R UFO: This term is often used for all reported scenes of unidentified objects in the sky, most of which have been proven to be natural phenomena (eg Venus) or artificial aircraft (eg balloon). More specifically, the term UFO refers to a "flying saucer" or other alien spaceship which is said to be visually visual. The belief in UFOs may be between innocent speculations that alien creatures have visited the Earth, or it may be a so-called presence of foreigners and a quasi-religious input to aliens' doctrine I do not. These creatures are often seen as insignificant (spiritual) entities that communicate with contacts through telepathy (spiritual). Their message actually violates the Bible's faith. Scientology can be seen as a UFO religion whose presence is an element of faith, the existence of an alien managing UFOs. In this context Christopher Partridge 's "UFO religion" and James R. Lewis' s "unidentified animal encyclopedia religion" discuss this. There are some similarities. Gregory Reece wrote in his book "Flying Disc Religion: UFO Cult and Culture", from this secret and its action, that science field is unique in UFO culture. Capitalist form Scientology is also difficult to classify. It has a strong similarity with the Ashtar Command and the Aetherius Society, but it emphasizes that the Xenu event as the core message of the organization seems to put them in the ancient astronaut tradition. In any case, the science field may be different from other UFO organizations. They try to keep everything secret in the space opera.

Proof of the outside world of Moore In his "proof of the outside world" Moore proposed several supporting hypotheses about the nature of things outside self. Moore mainly discusses hands; his argument is that both hands must logically exist if he can produce two hands. In addition, Moore's theory is that if there is only hands, it is proof of the outside world. Contrary to Moore's view, three main arguments will be discovered: firstly, all evidence of Moore is based on sensory input, and then the truth of other fact-based facts is problem It constitutes an epistemological circle of. I examined some responses to the skeptical challenges presented in Part 2. In particular, we saw four answers: (1) Descartes Cogito, (2) GE. "Proof" to Moore's outside world, (3) Dretsk denies cognitive closure, and (4) David Lewis's contextualism. After considering the strengths and weaknesses of these proposed solutions, we review the question whether skepticism is so bad or not and draw a conclusion. This course concludes with a discussion of why we have the concept of knowledge. If there is no concept of knowledge we are accustomed to, what kind of life will it be? Does this gap in our cognitive economy affect widespread or is our life as generic as that? In order to better understand if the concept is important or important, we will consider what kind of life can exist without knowledge of knowledge. Moore 's "evidence of the outside world" was created for the purpose of the soul, aimed at solving the "philosophical scandal" of Immanuel Kant. Obviously not enough for Kant and other philosophers. I believe the belief he said is true common sense, I believe in existence, and many other examples of congenital knowledge.

Wilbur Smith 's novel' God of the River 'is in ancient Egypt, the kingdom began to collapse, and the Egypt above and below was separated between the two rulers. This story is Taita's view, Taita is a multipurpose un unofficial slave. At the beginning of the story, Taita belongs to Lord Intef, manages his estate and helps take care of his beautiful girl, Lossris. She fell in love with Tanus, a good soldier, and a friend of Tita. Unfortunately, Sir Intef is opposed to Lord Harrab, the father of Tanus, and Intef is in fact unknowingly causing the collapse of the Harrab heritage to Lostris and Tanus. I have always been fascinated by the stories and stories of ancient Egypt. It does not matter whether I am reading when I meet the river of God. The god of the river is the second Wilbur Smith after Sunbird. I loved the sunbird, especially in the second half to bring the reader back to the Pharaoh era. In the god of the river, I was brought back to the land of Pharaoh again. The first chapter actually did not imitate the interest I should be built to me and I was skeptical that I was slowly dragged into the character's life though my skepticism did not last long It was. Each character has fun creatures, and then has its own space to grow into Tita. It would be a lie if I told you that Taito's ability is not overkill. He can do almost anything. Uh. It seems to be an ancestor of Rajnikanth The Nile is important for ancient Egyptians, but no god. I do not even have a name. Most people are simply called "rivers" or "all," meaning black. The god closest to the Nile is a drowning god, Happy. There is no temple in Habi. He is a fat god of jubilation, admired at the beginning of every flood cycle, and mentioned only in the remainder of the year. However, the Nile does not play a central role in the spirituality of ancient Egypt, but it is still the center of their social worldview. They set themselves south and came from the river from here. The east coast where the sun rises is the side of birth. The west side of the sun is the aspect of death. All the ancient Egyptian tombs and pyramids were built on the west side of the Nile River

The enlightenment of the United States was the host of a society that accepts the practice of slavery. Most people think this is a habit; especially in the south the economy will collapse (Davis 1). However, slaves do not cooperate with their slavery, there is a rebellion like the Stornano rebellion of 1739 ('Storono rebellion' apex 1). The treatment of slaves depends on the severity of the owner and the general rules of the area. In the age of enlightenment, so-called "authoritarianism with enlightenment" appeared. In authoritarian form, the rulers were influenced by enlightenment. Strictly speaking, these "enlightened" rulers are different from the sacred right of the king, as the former accepted the basic principles of enlightenment such as reasons and humanitarianism. For example, it is said that Joseph II of the Holy Roman Empire (1765 - 1790) completely accepted the concept of social contract. Frederick the Great of Prussia (control number 1740-1786) also allowed slavery, but kept the ideal of enlightenment. In Russia of the 19th century, Alexander II adopted the thought of enlightened and released serfs. In the end, even the enlightened authoritarianism is destined to be replaced in the historical process. Okay, men and girls, ready to enlightenment In this lesson I will introduce enlightenment. what is that? Enlightenment, sometimes called the era of enlightenment, was an intellectual movement from the late 17th century to the early 18th century, emphasizing reasons, individualism, and skepticism. Enlightenment challenged the traditional religious view. Because that was such a wide movement, enlightenment did not have an accurate start date. It did not pop up, but it gradually developed. Most historians came to the beginning of enlightenment from the mid 17th century to the beginning of the 18th century. The work of intellectuals like Rene Descartes, Barus Spinoza, Isaac Newton is particularly important for the creation of enlightenment.

Some VIP in the entertainment industry did not purchase the official version of the 2001 terrorist attack. The popularity of conspiracy books such as angels and devils, coupled with 9/11 traps and the growth of the Internet, can only stimulate insane flames. Whenever a celebrity wears a triangular pattern, Mitar blames them for quoting dollar bills and the eyes of Freemason's origins. If Beyonce likes goats, she obviously worships pagan god Bafomet. Hollywood stars who publicly supported the 9/11 truth statement are Rosie O'Donnell, Charlie Sheen and Edanzner. I will talk with the scene's radio host Alex Jones (www.infowars.com) about events on September 11. These celebrities often quote True supporters' claims, such as Griffin and Gauge (sometimes even the dollar). Former pro-wrestler and Minnesota governor Jesse Ventura made two 9/11 conspiracy shows in his TruTV series conspiracy theory (see "Dave Thomas v. Jesse Ventura: Skeptical blow")) Other well-developed As with pseudo-science, you can do thousands of personal discussions to support the US secret claims against 9/11 attacks. This report examines the most sustainable and frequently cited of these statements: the "free fall" of the tower, the report of thermite and molten steel, and the strange collapse of WTC 7. We will also briefly explain some of the factions developed (such as "No Planer"). In September 2012, skepticism of 'more straight' protesters at zero from the chemist's point of view was skeptical. For those who do not know, "truther" is a member of the 9/11 Truth Movement and refuses to provide official account of the 9/11 attack, but the US government's conspiracy should be condemned It is arguing. This series of videos covers everything from tropical aluminum found in dust to # WorldTradeCentre 7 crash. The video sees the scientific literature and deprives everyone by studying the real video evidence of the attack.

Locke, Berkeley, Hume's Enlightenment began with unmatched confidence for human reasons. The success of the new science through the elimination of the natural world of Locke, Berkeley, Hume influenced philosophical efforts in two ways. The first is to place the foundation of human knowledge in the human mind and put it in encounter with the physical world. The second is to direct the attention of philosophy to an analysis of the mind that can achieve cognitive success. John Rock set a tone of enlightenment by affirming the basic principle of empiricism: nothing in intelligence was in the past. Empiricism, a belief in the realization of knowledge through sensation, is the universal belief of several great contemporary philosophers. Perhaps the most famous empiricists are John Locke, George Berkeley and David Hume who are considered to be one of the most influential philosophers in the past 500 years. Due to the importance of experience in philosophical principles, each philosopher can be regarded as an experientist. More specifically, the empirical perspective of rock can be seen from his view on the primary and secondary nature of objects. David Hume Hume, David, 1711-76, Scottish philosopher, and historian. Hume brings empiricalism of John Rock and George Berkeley to the logical extremes of fundamental skepticism. He denied the possibility of certain kinds of knowledge and found a series of emotions in his mind and believed that the causal relationship in nature was entirely from B's introduction. The answer to the theme is drawn by the time committee named as illusion by David Hume, and the time committee named human by himself. In the era of modern philosophy, when the influence of Descartes was still important, David Hume brought the argument of killing the Descartes I created and skipping it like a ghost in human perception. You can see not only the theme but also the contrast between Hume and Descartes. Among the important philosophers related to empiricism are Aristotle, Thomas Aquinas, Francis Bacon, Thomas Hobbes, John Rock, George Berkeley, David Hume, and John Stuart Mill. Recently, positivists such as Mach, Vienna Circle, logical positivists, and most followers of analysis philosophy are empiricists. The central concept of scientific and scientific methods is that all evidence must be based on observable evidence by sensory or sensory extension empirically or empirically. It is distinguished from philosophical usage of empirical philosophy by using adjective "experience" or adverb "experience". Experience refers to the use of working assumptions used in combination with natural science and social science and can be tested or experimentally tested. In this sense, the scientific statement is the subject of our experience and observation and is derived from them.

Whether humans really have free will or whether their lives are completely decided is decided. This free will problem continues to be a place of philosophical debate forever. Many great philosophers tried to answer this question, but none of them answered as much as Immanuel Kant. He put the foundation of his argument in the foreword of the future metaphysics. In response to David Hume 's skepticism, Kant wrote this method, so Kant made a more resolute attempt to metaphysics. Thus, Kant 's irrationalism in its formulation was a combination of sentimentalism and Kant' s non conceptualism applicable to Kant 's practical agent theory. Or, in other words, for Kant, free choice and autonomy will come not only from the minds of human being but also from the mind, understanding or intelligence, and as long as they come from the human mind, they can come directly from the heart, not indirectly It is as much as possible. Concept, conscious consideration, mediation by propositional reasoning or reasoning Reasonable human condition 3, deep freedom and real people: metaphysical studies, Section 3.3 - Practice - Freedom of Life: Kant non-intellectualism Kant believes that there are no exceptions in the responsibility of not lying for two main reasons. Kant believes that human beings include dignity and essential value, free will and moral behavior. The reason why Kant does not tell a lie is based on his view on the intrinsic value of man and the free will. The first is about how the lies will affect ourselves and the second reason is about how the lies will affect others. First, Kant believes that when people tell a lie they are violating their dignity and intrinsic value (Rachels & Rachels, 2011, pp. 137-138). A lie conflicts with his moral, moral, and essential values. Furthermore, lying is likely to be influenced by liars, so it may hinder the ability to make reasonable choices about free will. Kant opened the third part by defining the will as the reason for our action. Kant believes that having will and reason is one thing, and having free will mean having the will to be influenced by external forces. This is a negative definition of freedom - we are telling us that freedom is freedom determined by foreign powers. But Kant also advocates a positive definition of freedom. Kant believes that free will give him certain laws - it sets its own purpose and has special causal power to achieve them. Free will is the intention that ordinary natural laws can achieve their actions in a different way than doing things. According to Kant, law is necessary to act. Actions not based on law are arbitrary, and we can not call motivation. Because free will is not only driven by external forces, external forces will not provide laws for free will.

Fox, Msnbc, New York Times ... This news dominates our lives in various ways. This is where we get information on what is going on in the world. When we got up in the morning, this is what we left for leaving home to collect; we saw it on TV. We read on paper online or on TV. This is an inevitable part of life. The news that the media provides us ... the most common thing is that it is full of hope. Stories such as shooting in the city and drowning children, or terrorist attacks; sometimes, stories that do not happen, stories of big "if"; the fear of these stories against our day-to-day activities , It had a big impact on our lives. Big impact You can not believe everything you read or hear in the news. There should be a disclaimer to be digested with sound skepticism. Many media are used as pawns of some higher agenda. Ask yourself if there is a good reason to let you react before you react. Is there anything I can do? In most cases, the news reports past events, metaphorical waters under the bridge, there is no reason to do so. If you take one thing from this article, remember this. Your health is your physical, mental and spiritual combination. There is absolutely not much wealth to be fair to health. If you sacrificed these things for material things you will regret that you can not enjoy the results of your labor. It is best to become a poor fisherman, not the death of the fishing company. Do not believe everything you listen to. In fact - do not believe even what you think. The fear of subconscious mistakes may lead your idea to a wrong direction and a different project scenario. Successful traders are based on reliable information (knowing the sources of reliable information), based on their own experiences and market trends learned from their own experiences and the ability to understand individual opinions so that news and rumors are made for simple purposes It affects their perceptions and beliefs about future purchases and sales of coins that have confused the market and won Something happens when we get older. It is just one kind of opinion, because some of media fans eating Coke want you to believe that they are drinking Coca-Cola and watching Coca-Cola, so polluting the media with our media It seems to use the media to handle as facts. As for commercial advertising, it shows that people interact with all colors of business. My name is BS. In 1999, Coca-Cola settled a $ 156 million settlement to settle racially biased lawsuits. Think like a child. Even if bones and skin are old Many criticizing social media, Facebook, and its founder Mark Zuckenberg are frustrated people whose lives are fading and are almost convinced of everything they have seen, heard, or read is. Most of the critics will prefer to stubbornly replace him. yes, I will

As the negotiations on the extension of the cash reform agreement between Greece and the euro area collapsed, the Greek relief plan ended on June 30 and the Alexis Tsipras government failed to repay the debt to the International Monetary Fund. The European Central Bank (ECB) has indicated that it will not provide emergency funds to banks, and the risk of Greece withdrawing from a single currency is also rising. How is it being implemented in the world? As of the end of 2013, Greek public bonds are estimated to account for 171.8% of GDP (ANSA, 2014), which exacerbated the increasing Greek debt crisis since the 2008 economic crisis . As Papaconstantinou (Greek Finance Minister) Haha said, the Greek crisis certainly gave consideration to several EU and euro area countries, the crisis challenged the euro area limit. It is undeniable that the presence of a common currency brings participants closer to the common currency area standard, even Germany, France, and the United Kingdom refuse to join the euro area, but its role in the EU is non Europe It is larger and unite than the countries. I think this is the reason to unite against a common enemy. In 1995, I started writing a novel called "the end of Europe". It should be a satire about a secret British plan to leave the European Union in the near future (and the euro area - one of my roles was George Soros style financier who changed pounds into a single currency is). The climax of the scene as the British military blocked themselves from the mainland was the closure of the Channel Tunnel. I would like to say that it has a wonderful foresight. But when I was in England at the beginning of the 1990 's in Brussels' correspondent (Boris Johnson "Telecommunications"), my pressure on British Europe skepticism was obvious. Writing in the UK. The exit seems to be not enough, or at least extreme, to create a good premise for humorous novels. Concern about the possibility of the collapse of the euro area last year was replaced by the possibility that the UK would withdraw from the EU. The broad consumer attention brought about by the long-term decline in crude oil prices was offset by the withdrawal of capital, which is anticipated by the expected deficit of some oil producing countries. Recent events in Spain and ongoing large-scale migration to Europe have been highlighted by many respondents and respondents. Despite the uncertainty of such event risks, the important reason for the overall positive view of the European market is that in the context of low interest rates, the difference between real estate yields and bond yields depends on many pension funds, sovereign wealth For funds and private equity investors. It is still attractive.

Morality is an article related to James Rechels and "not morally it is not relative" is incorrect. The discussion he offers can not be logically applied or irrelevant to the argument. His view seems biased towards some of the ideas advocated in cultural relativism, but he has problems with other parts of cultural relativism. The first mistake is an example of another moral code after his comparison. In the summary and explanation of cultural differences, he cited an example - he began to write articles about the difference between the Holy Land Kai Lily and the Greeks, and their funeral customs. What specific ethics are relative? Usually, morals are considered in relation to groups and individuals. Therefore, we distinguish between two kinds of moral relativism, such as beliefs, emotions, opinions, desires, desires, interests, preferences, emotions and so forth. Cultural moral relativism and personal moral relativism. It is moral relativism to believe that the moral truth is related to a particular individual or a particular individual. People who speak moral truth are related to what we call personal relativism and those who speak moral truth are related to a specific group that can be called cultural relativism As long as it is "culture"). . But this is a mistake. Imagine that all countries in the world are making different answers to "1 + 1 = ____". In this case, the fact that the answer to math questions is different does not mean that there is no correct answer. Likewise, simply having cultural differences does not mean treating morality as a subjective argument. Moral relativism, also called "cultural relativism", indicates that morality is related to each culture. When behavior violates ethical principles, people can not judge correctly the members of other cultures in addition to their own cultural standards. Moral principles may be different from their own moral principles. Shweder, Mahapatra and Miller (1987) argue that different cultures define moral boundaries differently. This term is also different from moral subjectivity. Moral subjectivity is the idea that moral truth is related to individuals. Moral relativism can be thought of as a form of moral skepticism and is often mistaken for moral pluralism. It opposes the moral superiority and ethnic-centered attitude in moral absoluteism and moral universalism. Rather than the variability of personal ethics (fairness, justice, rights) Society around the world is different from what I think is wrong. Moral relativism is the concept that moral principles are independent of culture and society from other cultures and societies, and according to this custom there is no universal moral standard. This moral belief has been widely rejected and is considered inappropriate in today's world society. One way that moral relativism is useful in today's society is to compare our society with yesterday's society.

As the Roman society fell into despair of philosophical skepticism and began to abandon all the pursuit of truth, the theologian Saint Augustine, a famous Christian philosopher, declared the basic truth of his "confession" I wanted it. Throughout his life, Augustine reflects the burden of all mischiefs and adults he caused as a child. He was always smart under his father's pressure when he was a child, and he was excellent at school. Saint Augustine was born in 354. In his adolescence he did not participate in Christian faith that he was "lucky". However, Augustine 's occupation is rhetoric, he found an educational job in Rome. In Rome he met Milan's bishop Ambrose, who was able to help Augustine through Christianity. Ambrose was the first intellectual Christian of Augustine and Augustine was impressed with his intellectual ability. - One of the things that philosophers are good at is usually to ask big questions without providing answers. However, Saint Augustine takes a more direct approach to his guesses and often provides a solution to his problem. He told such a topic to the heathens of the city of God. In this article, Augustine solves the problem of free will and expands his view. St. Augustine was the greatest philosopher in the early Middle Ages. In the book "City of God" (early 1980s), Augustine is a faithful Christian who lives in the town of God and the history of human beings as a conflict between infidels and heathens living in cities around the world I interpret it. . Augustine wrote that people in the town of God will receive eternal salvation, but people in the world town will be punished forever. This book weakens the beliefs of Roman pagan beliefs and further promotes the spread of Christianity. The heartfelt, fiery, eternal, confession of Saint Augustine has captivated readers over more than 1500 years. What he told about the fight between his long faith and the ultimate transformation - this is the first such historic spiritual memoir - Saint Augustine is a personal and universal sin, regret, redemption I will draw a story. Starting with his life, education and young and frivolous behavior, Augustine was filled with cruel sincerity with his proud and ambitious youth when he became a rhetorical teacher in Hippo, Rome and Milan It was. Over time, his early love became cold, the glory of the success of the speech disappeared, and he was filled with inner feeling of absentism until the movement of Christian religion reality, which eventually became convergence and It led to the development of a new life.

"Good Country People" is a short story written by Flannery O'Connor in the mid 1950s. The story takes place on a farm owned by Mrs Hopewell, Georgia. Flannery O'Connor uses the character's name and personality to symbolize that they are not the ones who think they are right. The main character Joy - Hulga has heart disease and nail legs. Her enthusiasm and disability reflects her heart as broken and weak. Mrs Hopewell is the mother of Joy Fulga and very much wants her daughter to be part of her life, but Joy has other opinions about herself. Naïveté, a good country of Flannery O'Connor, skillfully presented a story in the "Good Country People" that the hero Joy-Hulga thinks that she is not a good country from the third person's point of view It is. Joey is a young woman who is working hard in the deep American farm environment in the southeast where he feels he is not himself, a wise and well-educated but emotionally tempted son. - The unfinished story of Ernest Hemingway, the natural explanation of the ecological criticism of the last good nation in the 1990s is the story of Ernest Hemingway's "Old Man and the Sea" novel, and many of his novels I announced my work. Many nonfiction works and short stories are natural-oriented masterpieces. This paper is based on a story from Old South to Reality of Flannario Connor's book 'Good South to Discoveries - New South', Flannario Connor, 'Good people are hard to find' and 'Good Country People' South is very obvious. O'Connor uses these stories to show the difference between old and new and express her complaints about what the south is. O'Connor's complaints about the new southern can be displayed carefully Good Country People is one of the most popular works of Flannery O'Connor. It is said that it is Biography of O'Connor, but she never claimed that it is such a thing. The novel "Good Country Man" seems to reflect the current situation and emotional state of O'Connor when writing a novel. Flannario Connor lived only in her 40s; her lupus took her best and took one of the best short story writers of the 20th century Flannery O'Connor's "Good Country People" depicts the irony of the mother, Hopewell and her daughter Joy's life, and their relationship. This short story explains their character development through the details of their life. The selected paragraph uses a realistic tone to provide more information about Hopewell and Mrs. Joy. Flannery O'Connor provided an objective story of the story. And it made third party narrator a reliable source. - ... I think education is very important now. Skepticism may be beneficial or defensive by the subject, but it also has to admit the lack of consensus terminology. Economics is an important part of the economy, and as money is money many people use this term to determine the value of the economy.

Moral or immoral people think natural morality. They associate purity and goodness with nature. Unnatural is corruption and evil. Morality is based on spiritual and personal beliefs and respect for respect for others. Good judgment is not the same as right or good. Unqualified is not the same as immorality. Some people confuse what "yes" are and what they should be.  Nature is moral. Immoral or immoral. Sometimes it is necessary to judge the history through our current ethical standards - arguing that races and countries are historically outdated - people should be cautious about doing so. Those who accused the past by believing that they thought it was the "ordinary" system at the time seemed out of place because these systems are disgusting for us. (Thus questioning those who claim to remove monuments and monuments such as Gladstone and George Washington.) To support and disapprove what we are opposed now It is not particularly insightful to point out. . Because they live in times and societies with different values ​​from ourselves, it is natural that their behavior and beliefs do not meet the modern standards. (Of course, for Hitler, Stalin, Mao Zedong etc., especially for cruel people.) He supports to expand franchises not only to the working class but also to Jewish prejudices. The basis of moral standardism and moral relativism is the same, morality varies with time and geography. Since relativism is in a state of constantly changing value, it rejects judgment based on modern values ​​and standardism does not have appropriate background for such judgment, so judgment based on modern values Reject it. In a sense, since relativism and standardism seem to be disqualifying contemporary values, the two analytical methods arise from a common view. Moral relativism, also called "cultural relativism", indicates that morality is related to each culture. When behavior violates ethical principles, people can not judge correctly the members of other cultures in addition to their own cultural standards. Moral principles may be different from their own moral principles. Shweder, Mahapatra and Miller (1987) argue that different cultures define moral boundaries differently. This term is also different from moral subjectivity. Moral subjectivity is the idea that moral truth is related to individuals. Moral relativism can be thought of as a form of moral skepticism and is often mistaken for moral pluralism. It opposes the moral superiority and ethnic-centered attitude in moral absoluteism and moral universalism. Rather than the variability of personal ethics (fairness, justice, rights)

This is a video re-compilation completed by Dr. Rodrigo Ferrari-Nunes. It includes a case study to understand the movement of the Earth flattened from an anthropological point of view. In the original version, Rodrigo thinks a bit like a non-linear way I like to jump normally. So I made it a little shorter and rearranged some parts to make it more linear. An understanding of the flat earth movement from a series of mass conspiracy theories and scientific skepticism A few years ago, Lawrence Ralph, who was currently Assistant Professor of African American Studies and Anthropology at Harvard University, got a young doctorate. A student of anthropology at the University of Chicago. He entered the city with a hard problem and this project produced some of the most important research for centuries of gangs. This dynamics has created a vigilance (and fatigue) of the community to be studied; Ralph has moved to neighbor to establish contact, and he gave an anthropological name "Eastwood" It was. The age at which he worked near made his own past gang violence itself, and the resulting harm, and the way people live beyond harm. This concept of harm is spread throughout the community such as rebuilding, imprisonment, poverty, and HIV. This is a video re-compilation completed by Dr. Rodrigo Ferrari-Nunes. It includes a case study to understand the movement of the Earth flattened from an anthropological point of view. In the original version, Rodrigo thinks a bit like a non-linear way I like to jump normally. So I made it a little shorter and rearranged some parts to make it more linear. Because of our first anthropological mission, my class has read a short case study of culture that I have never heard before. When reading the case study, I remember the discomfort. That study reveals that strangers swallow what medicine gives to them. They also enter the special room several times a day, no one - even their children or spouses - are allowed to see them. At that time, I began to wonder if it would be better to adopt anthropology even after half an hour.

Introduction: Many experts focus on experts' views on data and research. Excellent experts will discover and test their research. The traditional old concept of police work leads to testing many adventures and something. George Kelling and James Q. Wilson analyzed and verified their hypothesis. I will break their "broken Windows theory" and how to change today's law enforcement agencies. Theme I. Broken Windows sets law enforcement criteria. A. Early start of broken Windows theory. B. Concrete discussion to break Windows theory. In 1982, James Q. Wilson and George Kelling proposed a law enforcement theory called Broken Windows. They use broken window terms as metaphor of obstacles within the community. Their theory links the confusion within the community, civilization and subsequent serious crimes. The theory has skepticism, most of which are scholars who have never seen a community with "broken windows". Recently diced brewed in New York City. The New York City Council plans to vote for the legalization of minor crimes such as urination of the public, possession of marijuana, possession of garbage, garbage dumping, public drinking, excessive noise, and park rules. Currently, these illegal acts are subject to the subpoena of the criminal court. The offender returned to the county criminal court about 45 days after the violation. If they do not show it, they issue arrest warrants. Many warrants have been issued. why? As you may know, the "broken window" is a community law enforcement theory that has attracted a lot of attention after Ferguson, Baltimore, Freddy Gray and Eric Ghana. You may hear it explained as a law enforcement theory fighting a small crime to prevent larger crimes. On 4th May, NPR summarized in this way. It sounds badly, aggressive and authoritarian. This theoretical view is supported by the death of Eric Garner 's television broadcast - as the world knows, he died when he was roughly involved in cigarettes.

Acquiring a short story Paul Darcy Boles is a proud, meditated, somewhat excited old man, but there are some useful messages for those who want to make a commercial viable short story. However, creating a story aimed at marketing is a serious mistake that has ruined other very fun literary works. Naturally, this writing style is taught by new generations who promise to be more creative than the previous generation. If you have not read the 1973 Le Guin short story yet, you probably have heard about that premise, or at least that part. We are told that Omeras is a beautiful city that is almost completely unimaginable individual freedom and happiness that I can hardly imagine. We were told that it is ultra modern, Eden, full of free love and the nakedness of the world. Collision (or perhaps the beach of Vancouver shipwreck). Le Guin seeks to mitigate the natural skepticism of the reader with its unique clean and efficient prose. It is said that there is no compulsion of governance and execution, hierarchy and religious restrictions. This is the world that John Lennon had imagined two years ago - a perfect civilized engine for happiness The time has come to show that it is obvious. There have been no writers wrongly believed in the international community for 150 years. Poe is one of the classic writers of American literature - master of short stories, magician of short poetry, criticism of glow and originality. A small part of his artistic approach is to attract readers from childhood to old age. Let's underestimate him eternally! There are few writers who have produced many forms of escapism like Edgar Allan Poe, and few people are still trying to escape. Poe's claustrophobic life includes trying to escape many times, but most of it is a failure. He has been used over and over and over again to avoid poverty, but he was not that long. He ran solitary to a weak, loving, but perhaps purely weak cousin of marriage. And drinks promise a sort of forgetfulness that has always attracted him, bringing increasingly destructive results. Edgar Allan Poe Edgar Allan Poe (the first master of short stories) wrote many short stories from mystery to illness. Edgar was born on January 19, 1809 in Boston, Massachusetts. Edgars Parents, David, and Eliza are both engaged in performance business. Some sisters rarely say in the slope. When Edgar was young, his father fled from his family leaving only Edgar, his mother and sister. At the age of two, Edgar 's mother died of tuberculosis. Then, Edgar was placed at the foster's home ... The most enthusiastic and creative fans of Ellen Poe may ask questions: Can I reproduce the wonderful Edgar's work? What? If the answer is yes then how is that? Although it can be thought that Edgar Allan Poe is not only his age but also one of the most famous writers and poets in modern literature as a whole, we still have many difficulties in imitating his work I am faced. In addition, acquiring him to a particular style or literary movement will bring us some very difficult moments.

The second atmosphere changes and suddenly returns to the mother's stormy night When such a slide grip does not show up again, slowly fade in and pickle it until you feel like you can not name it. When their lives go their way, whatever the future, they talk about their older friends painfully in their souls. Sometimes their heart fills with fire and passion, goes through the fields and gradually increases the memory of the surrounding world. But they gained the happiness of each of us, the pride and happiness that told the tapestries to them, and the lives they did. There are lots of memories behind you, infinite clues that shake in front of you, connections to other tapestries, friends' visits, enemies, and future soul mates. Loose lines can not be repaired again, the pattern will never be what you want, taste all the pins The air I breathed poisoned my lung more and more as I entered the holes like hell that appeared on each path. So, what you said about Andy, or "gold" was born in the novel (Hello, poetry!), Led a series of questions about love. Sarah Kay often talks about writing poetry as a question making process - doing something on the page, or finding answers or more questions within the process. When you ask David Orr of poetry critic, he may tell you that poetry and music are two different art forms. His response to the Bob Dylan Nobel Prize for Literature almost summarized his skepticism about the blurring of music and poetry boundaries. Literature and composition Langston Hughes and Bob Dylan Langston Hughes and Bob Dylan are two contemporary American poet poets from different eras. Bob Dylan is like a composer, but I consider most of his work as poetry. In this article I will explain the Hughes poem "Harlem" and Dylan's "A-Changin era" as a cultural explanation, but the background is different. Both poets use social protest actions to express their views. - The poems of Langston Hughes 's "I, Too" and Karen' s "Event" use different forms of visual images, tones, exaggerations, symbols and prophecies to explain the commonalities between the two different races ing. The interaction of life can not fight their prejudice like the private life of African-American civil war. Poetry was always my treatment. For the women who are nervous, nervous and worried, my only expression is poetry as a result of sneaky bastards that freeze in the middle of discussion. I grew up as the youngest of two brothers and sisters, and my voice drowned in the authority of the people who seemed to know better. But personally the situation is different. In my bedroom's privacy, I am a teacher, a speaker, a powerful poet. I pretend to be an audience, perform my poems, dramatic pauses, and emphasized phrases. I have not talked to anyone over the years, I think that it is strange and strange that it has no one else. After all, I wrote something personal. You can not make a stage together with personal things.

That's all. This is the moment he is waiting for. A moment that strengthens the hard coat in green and shows his true achievement to all. It is his opportunity to prove his skepticism is wrong and proud parents. Beautiful green trees with wonderful summer weather and background greet Max into the Court. He slowly walked towards the court with a slow line, and he looked quieter than it actually was. The only thing that separates him from his opponent is the net, and it looks as high as ever. I do not know whether to add this to a novel section or whether to put it in immediately. This story is instantaneous to a certain extent, but it is at best a fictional moment. I am having some intense conversations with myself, sometimes I think I can have friends. This is such a dialogue, I am enjoying it. I read storytelling somewhere, and writing a story will create more stories: the story will reappear. This story is presented in the same way. I am a big fan of Neil Gaiman, and I will spare no efforts to collect his stupid words and stories. I found some authentic gems. He did the experiment and asked Twitter fans to provide him with the tips for monthly writing of the year. 12 stories, flash novel, over a year. Every story there is beautiful in itself, but the story of January was pulling my attention and staying with me, it was emotionally exciting and exciting to produce this story. Think about what your current people are talking about the future story. Basically, all SF novels are set at the present moment, and the real problem occurring in reality occurs. Therefore, the story of all science fiction that we are familiar with must be executed in the context of those sentences to fully understand. Flash novels are intensive novels that are not affected by topics or plots. The flashing story is a thrilling arrow in your mind. It uses a summary of the narrative structure and understands the core of the story. The story is more than just a static moment: at one of these places something must be changed. In the traditional story, and in many flash counterparts, the role of master / view changes. In a wise way, there are usually internal and external changes: When conquering her fear of spiders, Polly beat the squid from the other side. Flash is so short that it is not usually satisfied and the change is either one. Other types of changes involve settings, or other key factors within the scope of the story. But we need to change Crazyhorse 's novel editor Anthony Varallo (see the interview on page 48) got the insight about the core of the story soon. "A good flash novel leads the reader to the already fully developed world.If you have not yet encountered the first punctuation, forget it There are three important elements of a good flash novel: The first line, the last line, and the title. He pointed out that these elements all need to work together.

Mr. Mr.'s struggle during the Victorian era included middle-class fruits produced by the industrial revolution brought about by the greedy and diligent efforts of British society, but this society has so many substances I have never seen wealth or wealth. Unfortunately, the controversy and desire during the industrial revolution has created a new human "thinking position". It led to skepticism about all aspects of human goals and existence. This motivation not only flooded the working class from the nobility to the poor but also influenced the literature of the art and creation of those days. John Stuart Mill, born in 1806, was the eldest son of James Mill and Harriet Baro (his influence on Mil greatly exceeded his father's influence). James Mill is a letter writer of the struggle who wrote "British Indian History" (1818), which gave him the craving position in East India Company. He was promoted to the prosecutor's office. Because of lack of administrative duties, James Muller spent considerable time educating his son John who began studying Greek at the age of 3 and Latin at the age of 8. By the age of 14, John was very fluent in Greek and Latin classics; he studied world history, logic and mathematics; and mastered the foundation of economic theory, all his fathers were John Stuart Miller I planned to make it philosophical. Some of the young supporters of the radical opinion. The British philosopher John Stuart Mill's 1859 book, The Statue of Liberty, highlighted the fight against freedom and government infringement. Muller's groundbreaking research focuses on the concept of "basic freedom" including the relationship between individuals and society, his opposition to government intervention, and the pursuit of freedom of speech and hobbies (including even attacks) I outline it. Please do not hurt other people. Berkeley has created a conservative political magazine 'National Review' and continues to be a prominent leader in contemporary conservative movements. He can be said to be one of the most influential political intellectuals of the late 20th century. Combining political conservatism with free market capitalism and anti - communism - we are forming a Republican ideology that we know today. The one I knew was the late creator of mills and milling machines in the late 1700s, late John Black Campbell (1890-1987). In addition to participating in a factory tour with Mr. Campbell in the early 1970s, he has also acquired books and catalogs for many years. (1) I recently lived in Roanoke, Virginia where Mr. Campbell was from. When John B. Campbell and John Fitz and Fitz Waterwheel fought, he returned to Roanoke for a while before starting his Campbell Water Company in Philadelphia. There he studied the factory in the area, and during the past few years I also worked at some factories in the Roanoke area and worked. So, at some point in the future, I am planning to write articles about several plant projects in the field. The next job is because the blacksmith asked me to write a newsletter to understand the relationship between the mill and the blacksmith. (2)

The question discussed here is about different theories about why witch hunting occurs. This is a topic with various opinions and opinions. There is no doubt that we truly understand the exact cause, but historians can make logical conclusions based on information based on supporting information and evidence. Not all ideas have evidence from the other, and some theories are almost ignored or rebutted. Hester's idea in "Reconstruction and Magical Hunting" took advantage of the feminist's attitude and relied on the theory of misogyny to explain what the possible reason behind the witch is. The mainstream magic theory and the first big challenge of magical hunting came from the Protestant doctor John Weil (1515-1588) - he believed that the witch is not evil but gave the supernatural power of the devil It is a tragic mental illness depression. Many of him confirmed that it is "a foolish, exhausted, unstable old woman" who was tempted by the devil's fraud and continued using hallucinogens. But skepticism and moderatism can not compete with the devil - at least for the first century or so. The voices of Montaigne, Will, Witkind, Pratorius, and Scots were drowned by a group of experts who did not get tired of seeking vigilance and persecution. Hunting and cleaning of witches is usually a search for people known as 'witches' with moral panic or massive hysteria or evidence of magic. The era of classical magic in early modern European and North American colonial era occurred in modern times or from 1450 to 1750, spanning the reform and the turmoil of the 30 year war, estimated from 35,000 to 100 thousand were executed . It is estimated that 1500 to 1800 people, over 200,000 "witches" in the Western world, including illegal and informal executions, were tortured, burned down or hanged. The last person who was judged to be a witch in Europe was executed in the 18th century. In other areas such as Africa and Asia, Sub-Saharan Africa and Papua New Guinea have reported on contemporary terrorist attacks and even today Saudi Arabia and Cameroon are finding official laws against magic.

The moral position The moral position of Dworkin is a rational and fundamental theory and self-evident. A moral position must give a valid (clear) reason to an effective moral position. Things like prejudice and emotion are not legitimate features of a moral position. In Dworkin 's "Moral Stance Concepts" he describes in detail what the moral position is and what the moral position is. Dworkin said that moral stance can not be based on prejudice or emotion. According to Webster's dictionary, prejudice is an unfair emotion, opinion or attitude toward race, religion or hostile nature of ethnicity. For ethical reasons, pacifists are usually opposed to violence for practical reasons, usually both. Consider the ethical position of this chapter and the actual position after chapter 3. Although this book is about practice rather than ethical considerations - most modern nonviolent literature - I think this is the moral principle that promotes pacifistic and nonviolent thought. The idea that killing is inherently immoral and that the human life is never infringed is the idea to encourage many pacifists to become pacifists. Let's see how Gene Sharp defines pacifism. It is a belief system that refuses to participate in war and violent revolution and is "people based on moral, moral, or religious principles". People who speak most directly about the evil inside of violence are religious pacifists. According to the religious view, those who break this moral law put the risk of God's wrath at risk and may be deprived of life in heaven. The position of meta ethical moral relativism is in contrast to moral objectiveism in general. Moral objectivism, let us assume that moral judgment is usually true or false in absolute or universal sense, and sometimes people justify accepting the moral judgment of truth It will be. Evidence available to everyone based on reasonable and sufficient information. There are various ways to challenge moral objectivism. Moral skepticism, we are unreasonable to accept or refuse moral judgment. Other views - various types of moral non-cognitive, expressiveism, anti realism, nihilism, etc. - go beyond the value of the truth implied by at least minimalism, thinking the moral judgment has no truth, S Assertion S which asserts that it is really simple (related opinion, error theory, argues that moral judgment is always wrong). This is just a matter of technical terms, but it is not always the case.

The United States has experienced various world events that make it a superpower of the world. From Monroe it means that America has withdrawn from the colonialism of European countries and positions itself as a superpower of the United States, ends the Spanish - American war, ends Spain 's rule in the United States, I will help you to earn. World War II and World War II ultimately destroyed the whole Europe, brought the rise and collapse of communism, and the end of the Cold War. Another aspect of global change is the rise of superpowers. Since the war has decisively changed the European countries, other countries emerged as powerful global players. The United States proved that it has a strong military and economic base. The newly formed Soviet Union is equally important. Communist leaders have dramatically changed the country from the emperor government to an example of a global revolution against the principle of capitalism. Despite the American isolationism policy and the reconstruction of the Soviet Union's socialism, we can conclude that the birth of these two superpowers has had a major impact on the social direction of the future world. Despite the anticipation of the outdated order of the nation state and the rise of the supernational existence, what is not predicted is that the world 's political alliance will appear in the form of the Earth of America. Under the framework of the Toffler wave theory, such institutions will represent the second wave of large prototypes if they are formed along the same path as the current nation state. Strangely, the possibilities of the Federal World Alliance in heterogeneous models (countries, trade unions, religious allies, companies, mass councils, intergovernmental organizations, etc.) are redundantly summarized. In recent decades, a series of scholarships have emerged that attempt to explain these trends along with the progress of large-scale US imprisonment and the rate of growth in other countries. On the surface, the US seems unlikely to become a global leader in this field. As a rich country with a broad democratic tradition, this system may solve criminal issues through prevention strategies while maintaining sound skepticism about the expansion of state power.

Hamlet, reflecting the symbol of the Renaissance, played a wave of change in Shakespeare's "Hamlet". The transition from a strong Catholic religion to a more human Protestant religion has gradually changed the view of the people of the Renaissance and how they are seeing the world. Hamlet was a process of change in the Renaissance era. The play begins with a firm belief in Catholicism and law in the second act of Hamlet's first act. Christian, he is not a choice because he believes that suicide is in violation of God's law. Hamlet was the first modern man, the man after the Renaissance, believed in "measuring everything of man". Craig (1962-63, Box 3, ƒB 5, pp. 79-81) <p. The power of value "and skepticism as a method are believed to be abandoned after passing the experimental test. 79> I cited some of the anonymous critics "I knew if Hamlet knew if he could not understand the mental confusion of his father." 79> <p. When things were mentioned before Hamlet, the sharpness of the Hamlet problem was thought to again indicate that Hamlet might have some personal knowledge about the spiritual walking of his father. "</ P. 80> <p.81> Hamlet may point to a visit when referring to his own weakness or depression. </ P.81> [By passive structure, Craig belongs No claim can be made. Below, Werder said that the murder of Polonius made Hamlet take his crazy attitude again. Hamlet urged not to reveal that her mother was not angry. He is acting madly in 4.2 and 4.3 and accuses himself crazy in 5.2. In William Shakespeare's Hamlet, the play is a tragedy of the Renaissance of Denmark, telling the revenge and cultural identity of Hamlet, and the responsibilities of his father and responsibility to society. Hamlet 's father was murdered and Hamlet was visited by his father' s ghost. His killer was Uncle Claudius of Hamlet, but he could not kill his mother. Claudius married Hamlet's mother one month after her husband Pharaoh Hamlet was killed. Prince Hamlet is angry with his mother Gertrude Hamlet is a good example of how the Renaissance influenced the script written during that period. Hamlet is about the role of Prince Hamlet's play, how he wants to revenge his uncle Claudius to kill Hamlet's father, King Hamlet. Hamlet wanted to kill Claudius to kill his father. There are many themes in "Hamlet", but there is nothing obvious than the theme of revenge that was very popular in Elizabethan era. Revenge is a hot topic of drama. An important article by James Black points out that "Hamlet is the best achievement of retaliation because Shakespeare changed this problem into a nature of revenge" (25). Hamlet faced difficult moral decisions, whether or not he killed Claudius. Hamlet was hesitant for the murder, and it was not certain whether he could finish it until the end. Revenge is the theme of other scripts in Renaissance. Revenge is a very popular theme at the Elizabethan Theater.

Influence of George Berkeley George Berkeley (1685-1753) is a pastoralist and a philosopher of Ireland at Trinity College, Ireland, where he completed a famous work on unimportant importance (believe everything) They are all substance recognition and exist only if perceived. Coleridge himself acknowledged the influence of Berkeley on his work, especially his poem "This Lime Tree Pavilion" and wrote a letter to Robert Sauce in July 1797. The first poem is accompanied by the following comment: "You remember, I am a Berklein." We can see the impact of Berkeley. George Berkeley is one of the three most famous British experiences. (The other two are John Locke and David Hume.) Berkeley presented his early visual work (an article on new visual theory, 1709) and metaphysics (a paper on the principle of human knowledge, 1710; between Hilas and Filonas Dialog, 1713). Berkeley 's empirical vision theory challenges the current distance vision standards, which argues that it requires implicit geometric calculations. His alternative account focuses on visual and tactile objects. Berkeley believes that visual recognition of distance is explained by the interrelationship between vision and tactility. This association method eliminates the attractiveness of geometric computation and explains the illusion of monocular view and moon that plagued the geometric explanation. I will calculate. Berkeley's 1709 publication only shows the beginning of the extreme idealistic view advocated by George Berkeley. Although Berkeley's view seemed unlikely at first at first, the idealistic theory he claimed was the only theory to avoid skepticism and dictatorship, it is difficult to give up, and ultimately the real meaning It was logical. Four years after publishing "Transfer of a thesis to a new visual theory", Berkeley revealed the most important philosophical work among his careers. Bishop of the 18th century philosopher George Berkeley showed a similar view in his idealistic theory. Berkeley said that the reality is equivalent to a psychological image - our spiritual image is not the copies of other material reality, but the reality itself. But Berkeley has a distinct difference between the image that he believes to make up the outside world and the image of personal imagination. According to Berkeley, in the modern sense only the latter is considered a "psychological image". Soon after Descartes came to George Berkeley. Berkeley accused the view of the realist. For Berkeley, the presence of important things (like trees) is meaningless. Presence can come to us only through thinking (not a physical experience), thinking must exist in assimilation of thought. The material purpose is deceiving, its essence is not meat, it is the ability to change importance. If the idea is not assimilated into thinking, it does not exist. Therefore, he recognized the Latin phrase esse percepi:.

Introduction is based on Kunt et al. (2011: 240) The financial crisis is a major loss of financial institutions, and / or failures of these financial institutions are measured by the abandoned production volume, which can cause disruption of the real economy or cause confusion Yes. The world capital market brings the same problems as jet aircraft. They are faster and more comfortable, and they can help you overcome. But the crash is even more spectacular. Even though some of the elite in the world economy seems to be doing nothing, the financial crisis has created a major obstacle to the real economy, the labor market and the deep-seated thinking of society. The economic and financial crisis of 2008 - 2009, also known as the global financial crisis, is considered the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression. The overall picture of the financial market has become more complicated by the introduction of new financial products and different operational modes including globalization. The global financial markets appear to play a variety of roles in the economy and have played a part in new regulations. The introduction of a new trading platform, online access to information, integration and market globalization brought about a review of several financial theories. What are the reliable predictors of the economic and financial crisis? Please describe the outcome and unresolved issues in the global crisis. Are we still in danger of economic and financial problems today? Question: The 2008-2009 economic and financial crisis, also known as the global financial crisis In the global financial crisis, a new paper on journalism research focused on mainstream newspapers in the United States, the UK and Australia during the 2008 global financial crisis. According to the newspaper, the mainstream financial media "generally do not issue warnings, lack sufficient skepticism when reporting finance and economic trends, journalists are closer to sources of information used to obtain information Too much. " Poverty, a study by Media & Jornalismo published at the Media and Journalism Research Center at Coimbra University in Portugal, reports that Western news media frequently reports poverty performance such as famine, overcrowding and natural disasters, but "poverty is" emergency The problem, "the reporter says,

Is there too much reality show? On the other hand, programs like Big Brother will only appear for a specific period of the year, but when the older brother was there for a long time it consumes a lot of time to play the television. Still, many UK publishers are enjoying great brothers and words there every week. Others may think people are only watching television reality show. Big Brother's drinking is the most drunken drink, and no one can drink water. When young people can drink alcohol every year by drinking wine, students spend 3 billion pounds on alcohol. , Milk, juice etc. If I ask you to list the habits you think is bad for you, you may list something like drinking too much, eating, watching too many reality shows I do not. All these customs are not supportive or unhealthy, but even if it is not really an insult, it will approach a poisonous habit, there is another bad habit. Do you know what I am saying? You, me, and almost all the girls and women I spoke have a self-worthy polluter who spins in subconscious - emphasize us and stretch ourselves too much for ourselves and ourselves I try to prove the value of the fact that I do not actually own it. Represent scientific reality clearly on television and complete the interpretation of reality based events. Too many televisions assume that many of the amazing ideas on reality are reality and that there are too few skepticism based on evidence. You should take a more responsible attitude towards the belief of mass media products. As mentioned by Susan Murray in his book "Reality TV: Remaking TV Culture", "Reality TV can provide experimental opportunities for viewers and may also be trained on surveillance and voyeurism." Reality TV monitors Normalize the concept of. / Naturalization of the American people Naturalization of the growing surveillance culture has existed for a long time. Since the early 1990's, participants in real-world shows such as Real World and Big Brother were monitored ignoring the presence of the camera and were trained to train audiences to monitor at the end. Streaming media and subsequent self-monitoring functions are mechanisms for social supervision and discipline. Panoramic videos such as Foucault, Reality Show, Streaming Media, Social Media Story are also controlled without requiring compulsory training. The definition of real television may be the way it is shot. Regardless of whether the show is using a real environment with the real people (like a documentary), in front of a spectator in a live studio participating in the show, or using hidden surveillance, the real TV I will catch everything. In this article we will check the composition of today's reality program, the type of reality program, the popular time, and whether it is "authentic" as claimed. But first let's see how it started.

Introduction The current financial crisis occurred in 2008 and lasted for a while. It caused various degrees of economic recession in various parts of the world. Government officials of financial institutions and economists will try to correct financial mistakes and reduce the risk of future financial crisis. In this article we will use the UK financial system as an example for analyzing financial rules. First, it gives the background of the financial crisis. Secondly, after analyzing examples of the UK and international markets, the old regulatory failures that occurred in 2007 - 2008 failed. The financial crisis in 2008 revealed that there is a big gap in economists' understanding of financial intermediation. Mainstream economists have a very simple and stylized bank model that ignores the enormous number of financial products and strategies that have evolved over the past 50 years. They argue that they can answer questions about financial regulation, such as how to set bank capital requirements without clearly understanding how financial intermediaries create value. Currency insanity examines the financial crisis of 2008 and its continuing impact from the perspective of the international currency system. The purpose of this white paper is to conduct a more comprehensive and coherent investigation of several key factors underlying it, beyond the standard interpretation of the serious financial crisis. This is also an attempt to put the crisis in a wider historical context. In order to achieve this goal, we conducted critical research on the essence of modern currency and the process of creating money / credit. Both of these are difficult to understand for many so-called experts. It also examines the role of the dollar in the system and argues that the accumulation of excessive debt in the global economy is an inevitable and predictable result of having the national debt function as a major international reserve of the world central bank ing. In the global financial crisis, a new paper on journalism research focused on mainstream newspapers in the United States, the UK and Australia during the 2008 global financial crisis. According to the newspaper, the mainstream financial media "generally do not issue warnings, lack sufficient skepticism when reporting finance and economic trends, journalists are closer to sources of information used to obtain information Too much. " Poverty, a study by Media & Jornalismo published at the Media and Journalism Research Center at Coimbra University in Portugal, reports that Western news media frequently reports poverty performance such as famine, overcrowding and natural disasters, but "poverty is" emergency The problem, "the reporter says,

INTRODUCTION Descartes' first philosophy's contemplation is aimed at establishing absolute certainty and "something in a stable, perhaps sustainable science" (meditation I.18). Descartes tried to destroy all his old beliefs and to restructure his foundation from the beginning. He used a series of exaggerated doubts and returned to establish the certainty of all his clear and unique thoughts after denying all the preconceptions he considered ordinary. At first glance, Descartes' philosophical debate seems to be very logical and reliable. The inherent periodicity of Cartesian reasoning is revealed by Arnauld whose objection is called the Cartesian circle. Descartes believes Descartes is based on the fact that Descartes has a clear and definite view of God, but the credibility of the Descartes' clear and unique view is that the fact that God exists rather than a cheater Guaranteed by. Therefore, in order to show the existence of God, Descartes must assume that God exists. Descartes' overall goal is to help humans master and possess nature. He provided an understanding of the tree of the world knowledge trees, flexor optics, meteorology and geometry and established its metaphysical basis in meditation. Then he spent the rest of his life in the field of mechanics, medicine and ethics. Dynamics is the foundation of his physiology and medicine, and this is the basis of his moral psychology. We can track the great importance and influence of Descartes on the development of mind and body dualism and modern skepticism, but he provides many other species for discussion. Descartes, the discussion of wax, the idea of ​​Descartes, the theory of body and perception are important arguments. But he proved that the evidence of the existence of God is not ingenious and not so successful. Descartes is an attractive research topic because you can see the view of the modern world born from his writings. Abstract: Cartesian dualism and combination of thinking and body are often understood as contradictory concepts. In the temporal interpretation, Descartes was believed to be the first dualist (in meditation) and later developed his position for body and mind (passion). Some authors did not find a solution to this problem. Nevertheless, over the past 20 years several explanations have been developed to actively solve the difficult relationship between Descartes dualism and the thought and body combination. The problem I found in most of these problems is to inconsistently describe his concepts of Descartes dualism and union and interaction, by them "weakening" or by "more flexibly" dualism It is trying to do. I developed a synchronous interpretation based on textual evidence to show that dualism and trade unions appear simultaneously in Descartes' work.

This article intends to oppose Moor's moral intuition. Although I may have a moral instinct, I prove that it is not a set of standards that can be directly applied to everyone. I will show the scenarios and circumstances of the differences that must be considered before using ethical intuition and discussion. The first argument I would like to claim is cultural relativism. It is widely thought that ways of observing living are different if the culture is different regardless of region or the world. Moore's discussion is a typical example of "Moore's facts". In other words, if you can intuitively understand rather than oppose the premise of this intuitive philosophical debate, it is true that you know intuitively. Probably the correct explanation is Occam's razor's epistemological case which is the simplest, in the case of whether we can know something and whether the world exists, I think that the bet on this argument is too high maybe. We can not rely on general principles. Nonetheless, the Moorite 's argument against skepticism is a completely logically legitimate argument after transferring the burden of proof to skeptics, but there seems to be some problems still. This is explored with Pryor's work. "What's wrong with Moore's claim?" Discussion of Moore 's public argument can be seen as a form of giving this intuition. For example, if you can define excellent moral attributes from the perspective of perfect psychology, biology, or sociology, moral truths become psychological, biological, or sociological truths, empirical You can discover through research. Proper Science However, Moore believes that all of these definitions must fail, because something with relevant empirical attributes is always an unresolved issue. Moore's assertion can be grasped as follows. His argument against intuitionistic moral philosophy is divided into two parts. The first part points out that intuitionists can not incorporate our intuitive moral judgment into the system. There is no complete list of intuitive ethics nor the basic ethical principles for finding such a list (CW 10, 206). The second part of Millian's claim is interpretation of this result. Some people say that moral intuition is actually the result of our education and the current social discourse. Society permeates our moral opinion to us and we begin to believe their undoubted truth. However, Victorian morals do not have institutions or basic principles. In "an obedient woman", Muller criticized the moral intuition of the same generation of female characters strictly. He discovered that they are incompatible with the basic principles of the modern world like equality and freedom.

Cultural stories seemingly blur the seemingly most objective people, scientists and even the basic truths of biology and nature. I have always believed that scientific facts are the most pure and fairest representations of the truth. But even biological phenomena are affected by strange distortion of prejudice. The roles of stereotyped men and women explain how colored scientists explain the biological processes of fertilization for hundreds of years. Due to this cultural bias, it is difficult for scientists to explain what they see with unbiased words. Camels (including the bay) look to their agricultural culture and act like an elephant of myopia, like fish to water, they say that the world will succumb to their wish I think, but refusing to adapt to the new survival requirement when all engines are reversed, trapped in a self-critical belief system, abandoning self-criticism and strategic thinking about the surrounding world, very dangerous Their dangerous ... their blindness sexuality leads to the lack of diplomacy and diplomacy of their delusions, as well as to the correctness of civilization (see diplomatic events of the Arab League Congress hosted by Egypt Essi). They mistakenly believed that they were appointed by God and made a fatal mistake to reject people of all countries to undertake the HAJJ ceremony. Orwells asks the people to accept the story of intervention promotion from blind beliefs of the same authorities who lied to Iraq. The United States has invested billions of dollars to change the Syrian regime change and terrorist factions in the west have issued hundreds of thousands of deaths to harass the country, but we suspect that skepticism is dangerous I will believe. That's right. There is no doubt that Higgins is a propaganda whose job is to help keep a new conservative story online, and it is said to be anti-war, the environmentally friendly left wing George Monbeot is in this blood I am starving and cheering New conservatists.

Brief History of Modern Architecture In the case of irony and irony, this is not an objective history, but it is written by Wolf's defeat of the 20th century building tendency. I studied this era in the history of architecture, I do not recommend them to people who are not familiar with modern architectural key figures, emphasizing the architects themselves rather than their own designs. Skepticism about modernism is not limited to the UK. In the United States, Tom Wolf wrote from Bauhaus to our house, from Bauhaus directly to the United States to explain the Prince of European silver, he wrote that he built houses that look like worker's house and pesticide factory. Reliable point He suggested that any attempt to actually sit on the Le Corbusier's reclining chair would adopt karate behind his neck. "In modernism attacks on inhumane behavior, and in the extreme case anything that can be filled with contemporary nicknames has concluded that modernism can not find beauty and that it is not worth it. I thought, "Wilk said. The mind still believes in the early moral mission of modernists. Therefore, the crime of a concrete tower where Le Corbusier's design is inadequate and construction is inadequate has little to do with his work. The wolf suddenly came to our house from Bauhaus and finished his question. But the answer is in its early stages, Wolff explained the first principle that Gropius and his colleagues built Bauhaus. They were so excited by the new industrial era and they named themselves as Prince. I think there are many designers close to many things today, but that is more than just the possibilities of new materials and manufacturing processes. Design enthusiasm, such as behavioral interventions, nudging in the "correct" direction of people, most people meaning "right" or supporting loyalty, is one example of the same impulses leading to machines is. To survive This is synonymous with a hero designer, bring new knowledge to customers, educate customers, and improve customer hobbies. Walter Gropius and other Bauhaus teachers and graduates play Moses' role and can acquire knowledge that has not been washed from the mountain even if it is not washed. I passed the director of the Yale museum. Designers have problems as a convincing taste maker. Mr. Wolf said how modernist luxury clients feel dissatisfied with the design of architects and how people working in modernist architecture impose restrictions on their "living machines" I often speak about what. For Gropius and Mies, Philip Johnson and others, if the customer is not satisfied, it is because they are caught by their bourgeois view, not because the building is bad.

While reading Nathaniel Hawthorne's "Young Goodman Brown", I could not help felt constant fear. Its roots may come from the "ghost forest" deep inside the dark environment of the story, or the mysterious "devil" of Brown - companion. As I read it, I came up with another story about the collapse of Usher's house in Edgar Allan Poe. In the story of Poe, when he explained the reunion of two friends at "Arthur's House", he was able to feel the same spiritual impulses. With "window like eyes" and "sad impression" in the mansion, Poe wasted Gothic style wasting time. In this article, I will explain three pieces, "Rip Van Winkle", "Young Goodman Brown", and "The Usher of the House". With all the works, the hero enters nature, the garden of Eden is set to satisfy the power of evil. He called this "skepticism like paradise" or "to recognize the retreat from heavenly ideals from the limits of human knowledge" (249). Most critics explain these works as portraits of American experiences, but I admit that humans do not shift from ignorance to knowledge, but he can not understand everything. In the chapter 'Young Goodman Brown', Haha wrote that the forest was once a garden of Eden, but was contaminated by a snake (an old man) who later controlled the wilderness. Literally and metaphorically, the deviation of Brown's belief is a journey of uncertainty, and his knowledge will be tried. Comparing the fall of King Arthur, young Goodman Brown, and Lip Van Winkel, in the early 18th century American literature began the style revolution with the next writer. The author regarded nature as symbolism and started to look at society as a source of sin. What is emphasized in most stories is to give the reader a fresh perspective on their lives and society as a whole. Three stories using this special technique are Nathaniel Hawthorne's "Young Goodman Brown", Edgar Allen Poe's "The Fall of Arthur", Washington Irving's "Rip Van Winkle".

In order for a rocket to fly, some basic physical rules must be followed. It can not escape from the basic rule that the center of gravity must be before the pressure center. The center of gravity center of gravity or Cg is expressed as if all masses are concentrated on that point. Simply put, you can balance rockets with your fingers. Cg is also the point where the rocket rotates. This is very important for the stability of the rocket, you will see it soon. "I tend to handle things from a physical framework," Musk said in an interview. "Physics teaches you from the first principle, not analogy, so let's look at the first principle: What is a rocket? In addition to aerospace grade aluminum alloys, some Titanium, Copper and Carbon Fiber. Then I am Q. What is the value of these materials in the Commodity Market? We can see that the material cost of rockets is about 2% of regular price theoretically, In principle, we need to deeply deeply understand the basics of the situation deeply: René Descartes, a French philosopher and scientist, now adopts a method called Descartes skepticism to accept this method Everything is suspected until I leave a purely doubtless truth he sees. " Fiorello Bodini woke up at night and went out to listen to rockets flying to Martian, Saturn, and Venus rockets. He is a crap dealer, but his family succeeded in saving enough money to get on the rocket. The acquaintance tells him that he is going to fail, the rest of his family is indignant no matter where he goes. His children are excited about this possibility The rocket consists of thousands of complicated and complex parts. Rockets need to concentrate so that the whole team fly properly for each subsystem. And usually it will not work. In the past few weeks there was a pre-flight checklist, which took many years to assemble individual rockets. Given the inherent complexity of rocket launch, the 95.43% US launch rate is strange. Excellent scientists and engineers manufacturing rockets are most cautious and must understand the most intimate details of these huge machines.

The theory of chromosome genetics proposed by Walter Sutton and Theodor Boveri in 1902-1903 is considered a landmark event in genetics (Martins, 1999). This theory establishes chromosomes as carriers of genetic information (genes). It also suggests that chromosomes (not genes) undergo separate classification and isolation proposed by Gregor Johann Medel (1865-1866) in genetic laws. Multiple genes can be included on the chromosome. Despite the high skepticism of contemporary scholars on this view, Thomas Hunt Morgan (1915) showed that linear arrangement of genes in the chromosome provides compelling evidence for Sutton-Boveri's studies . Epigenetic mechanism refers to the inherited influence (no phenotypic change and genotypic change) on chromosome or gene function without change in DNA sequence (in the cell or offspring of the individual). These changes may persist for several generations of cell divisions. Although it was thought that there is no new generation of neurons in the nervous system, the research showed that the brain keeps neural stem cells (NSC) adulthood and neurogenesis continues to occur. Epigenetics knows only that a small part of the genome is expressed. There are a number of factors that influence which genes are expressed and which genes are silenced. One of the factors is the use of neural pathways and shows the use of new neural pathways (new ideas) to determine which genes are expressed. By choosing (focusing on) ideas that are right for you, you can represent genes that fit yourself or silence genes that may be harmful. Not only is it focused on what I do not want, I am addicted to it. I like browsing things I do not own, things I do not want, hatefulness and indignation. It is difficult for it to resist the same necessary path. However, it can be realized with a conscious effort Given the heightened expertise, an important new scientific field, epigenetics, was born. Epigenetics basically studies how environmental factors affect the expression of our genes. When biology comes to its own field in the 19th century from my medical and natural history, any biologist can master the whole field. Today, many geneticists will tell you that they do not have a real understanding of epigenetic discoveries. Researchers in genetics now know that individual DNA is essentially invariant, but a wide range of environmental factors may cause so-called epigenetic differences. Epigenetics affects which genes in an individual's genome can be turned on or off. Factors such as exercise, sleep, trauma, aging, stress, illness, and diet have been shown to have epigenetic effects, some of which can be taken over to the next generation. Dr. Siegel said that when the eggs divide, the genome of the same twin will also change, causing specific genes to be defective. In a pair of identical twin girls, one can experience a phenomenon called X chain inactivation. Because of this genetic influence, two identical Dionne earthquakes are color vision abnormalities

Transcendental philosophers need special enlightenment to enter the classics of transcendental philosophy (Kant's "criticism", Descartes' metaphysics "and Fichte's" scientific doctrine "). Three kinds of transcendental thinking are fused, rational autonomy is regarded as the ultimate foundation of defense. Therefore, the philosophical education of all three philosophers focuses on how to grasp and make available highly intelligent (or active self decision) of intelligence and survival. The modern transcendental philosophy was developed by a German philosopher Harald Holtz in a holistic approach. Holz freed the transcendence from the fusion of the new cantanism and critically discussed the transcendental pragmatism and the transcendental philosophy, the relationship between the new empiricism and the so-called postmodern. In everyday languages, "transcend" means "transcendence", "self transcendism" means transcending the form or state before you. This mysterious experience is considered to be a state of transcendental self transcendence, in particular, self recognition is abandoned there. "Self transcending" is psychologically measurable, is considered (at least in part) genetic, and has been included in the temperament and personality list as a personality dimension. Dean Haymer explained this finding with the book "Genes of God", but this was criticized by critics like Carl Jimmer. Transcendence is born from "romanticism in England and Germany, John Gottfried Herder and Friedrich Schliermach's biblical criticism, David Hume's skepticism", Emmanuel Kant and German idealism. Philosophy of transcendental theory. Miller and Versluis believe that Emanuel Swedenborg has a universal influence on transcendentalism. It is also strongly influenced by spiritual and spiritual philosophy, in particular Hindu texts on Upanishad. Transcendentalism is closely related to monotheism, the main religious movement in Boston in the early 19th century. After Henry Weir was elected Professor of Hollis theology in 1805 and John Thornton Kirkland was elected President in 1810, after acquiring monotheism at Harvard University, it began to develop. Transcendentalism is not a rejection of monotheism but rather an organic result of a monotheist emphasizing the value of free conscience and intellectual rationality. Transcendentalism is based on the transcendental philosophy of German idealism, seen as a substitute for the rock style "spiritism" of God's church by New England intellectuals in the early 19th century. They want to establish their religion and philosophy through transcendental principles. Thus, they can not achieve through perceptual experience, whether they are not based on sensory experience, but rather using the principles that are achieved from the human inner, spiritual or spiritual nature It means. Immanuel Kant said, "All knowledge transcendence is not about things, but about the knowledge patterns of ours." Since the transcendentalists were basically inspired by the German philosophy of the original text, they relied primarily on the works of Thomas Carlyle, Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Victor cousin, and Germaine Starr. In stark contrast to the philosophy that the transcendentalists do not know, they are very familiar with the English romanticism.

The history of Western civilization can not be divided finely into strictly linear parts. Instead, they need to be viewed as a series of evolving threads that combine, interact, and make a universal transition at different time intervals. Enlightenment in the 18th century was one of the historical transformations of these paradigms, challenging traditional authority by investing in rationality and the power to change human condition. This general emphasis on rationality and independent thinking has brought about explosive growth in the transformation and development of science, philosophy, religion, and politics. Okay, men and girls, ready to enlightenment In this lesson I will introduce enlightenment. what is that? Enlightenment, sometimes called the era of enlightenment, was an intellectual movement from the late 17th century to the early 18th century, emphasizing reasons, individualism, and skepticism. Enlightenment challenged the traditional religious view. Because that was such a wide movement, enlightenment did not have an accurate start date. It did not pop up, but it gradually developed. Most historians came to the beginning of enlightenment from the mid 17th century to the beginning of the 18th century. The work of intellectuals like Rene Descartes, Barus Spinoza, Isaac Newton is particularly important for the creation of enlightenment. It is impossible to talk about enlightenment unless you talk about the political leap of this age. The historian follows the scientific beginning of enlightenment to Principal Mathematica written by Sir Isaac Newton in 1686. This work is considered to be the majority of the philosophy driving science, mathematics, and enlightenment, in combination with John Rock's "Papers on Human Understanding" (1689). It is said that enlightenment really began with the 1776 American Revolution. The idea of ​​rethinking the minds of people through writers such as Thomas Payne, John Rock, Thomas Jefferson, has finally tried the Republic for the first time since the Roman period. Like other era of enlightenment, founder of the United States returned to the classical era and planned as to how they would like to manage their new country. An important person in the establishment of America like Thomas Jefferson was greatly influenced by enlightenment. That means that this country is also true. Jefferson has both classical education and humanities science training, practicality and experience, so it is a perfect person of enlightenment. As the author of the Declaration of Independence, Jefferson formed the country by integrating the concept of natural rights in government and religion. In addition, he understands the importance of education in making these ideals work in a new country and establishing the University of Virginia. In many respects, Jefferson represents a way the Enlightenment ideals can be carried out in new colonies. The same can be said of other men like Benjamin Franklin. Because they have so many systems and pamphlets on which the state is based, and enlightenment still exists.

The direction of FROMM tests how good each word is for you. 5 (very good), 4, 3, 2, 1 (not at all). You need to summarize the first four directions, sum some rows, then sum them up and divide by the last direction. The graph should be clear. Tender____Captivating_____Witty_____Sum_____Gullible_____Arrrogant_____Stubborn_____Indifferent_____ Sum_____Optimistic_____Gracious_____Reserved_____Curious_____ Sum_____Cowardly_____ Conceited _____ suspicious _____ inappropriate ____ "Human disobedience continues to evolve, human history can start with disobedient behavior and can not end with obedience." - Fromm - hiccups. "War, not only the riots, even when you kill us, we do not respect all of life, all of the contempt stubbornly, witnessing all the contempt, and close our eyes. With a little humorous skepticism, we can kill a lot of future in young men. "- German poet, novelist, Hermann Hesse Erich Flas is a German psychoanalyst and philosopher with influence in the 20th century. One of his most important works is the text "Are you there?" In this book I emphasize the difference between "have" and "yes", and the difference between Flom and the reason why I think my life is an important aspect. Over the years, two different concepts have been widely discussed between philosophers and analysts. - often called for Donatello or our modern movie crowd, he also wisdom, gentle calculated as of the invention gift, it has been known as the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtle. Donatello is one of the Renaissance masters and will be one of the most influential artists in Italy in the 15th century. But what I'm about to talk about today is neither strained isomorphism nor biological imitation, but the concept called biofilm, first written by the German philosopher Frome in the mid-20th century. Fromm is the essential link between man and nature - he is calling it a concept of Biophilia - believe are intertwined by eight basic human needs: Since then, bio the concept of Philia is the new generation of architects and space planners was to stimulate the interior designer, excellent visual of the natural elements of modern indoor and outdoor design (and perceptual) for integrated directly into the language new I have developed a design movement (a natural building).

Argentina's financial crisis in the late 1990s and early 2000s caused serious problems such as external debt, inflation, unemployment and domestic political instability. Argentina has experienced a political crisis as well as a currency crisis. The outcome of the economic collapse is very serious, the Argentinans civil war and protest, which worsened Argentina's problem at the beginning of the century. Other issues related to the financial crisis, such as Argentina's population's impact on life, political instability, corruption, etc. are definitely worth discussing, but this article will focus on the currency crisis and Ar. Argentina's financial crisis devastated the country throughout 2001. The inflation rate and the unemployment rate in this period are rampant by youth malnutrition scenes and households who are looking for goods such as cardboard, glass and metal. Many of us know about the financial crisis in Argentina and it is difficult to understand its meaning. What most people do not know well is the cause of this incident, what happened in South America since 2001, and how it affected the world society. Detailed analysis of the overall situation will be done to better understand all aspects of the immediate problem. This will enable us to analyze and hope that such atrocities will never occur again. In addition, we can distinguish ways this financial crisis has become the wealthiest country in South America in the past; Argentina In the global financial crisis, a new paper on journalism research focused on mainstream newspapers in the United States, the UK and Australia during the 2008 global financial crisis. According to the newspaper, the mainstream financial media "generally do not issue warnings, lack sufficient skepticism when reporting finance and economic trends, journalists are closer to sources of information used to obtain information Too much. " Poverty, a study by Media & Jornalismo published at the Media and Journalism Research Center at Coimbra University in Portugal, reports that Western news media frequently reports poverty performance such as famine, overcrowding and natural disasters, but "poverty is" emergency The problem, "the reporter says,

Decline of authority When Alice looked for glasses across wonderlands, she encountered various personality and her absurd claims cast doubt on her implicit assumption. The strange logic these characters brought to Alice forced her to acknowledge and reevaluate the objective truth she had previously accepted. As Carol's absurdness is exaggerated with an observable phenomenon in society but has identifiable similarity, this discrepancy makes sense, meaningless to Alice (and reader) that Carol's Have the experience of the essence of the satire. Epiphany Before the autumn of 2003 to 2004, the universe (such as a great architect) sent us to Grand Rapids, Montana, USA - they actually put the hydropower dams in several Missouri states. The waterfall is on the river near the Great Falls, Montana State. The geological and practical nature of these geological features, and the amazing integration of this geographical feature, were initially considered valuable named after the town of Great Falls. Each waterfall in Missouri Province in Cascade County has a hydroelectric dam. I think there is a total of 5 dams per 15 miles in Missouri. Historians have been fascinated by the decline of great civilizations like ancient Greece and Rome. However, for human beings, corruption does not include lessons less important than the collapse of the United States, ending the era of virtue and leading the entire planet into the second dark era. The philosophical power that ultimately destroyed the United States was released even before the birth of the country. His philosophical skepticism of 1748 "David Hume" will not rise tomorrow, the proposition is equally understandable, which means that it does not contradict it any more. In 1781, he wrote, "Purely rational criticism of Emmanuel Kant finds it necessary to deny knowledge to make room for faith," he wrote. Publications five years after the establishment of the United States of America

BonJour's "basic anti-fundamental argument" Abstract: BonJour believes there is no basic empirical belief. But Assumptions 3 and 4 together gave rise to the "Bon Jour rule" - considering human psychology, p is reasonable only when there is reason to believe that the premise of the argument is likely to be very likely I believe. Responding to his skepticism, limiting premise 3 to basic beliefs and failing to note that the rules do not need "clear" beliefs will fail. The details of Shirasu 's actual discussion are difficult to decipher. The most promising reorganization of the Silas argument occurred in chapter 4 of BonJour (1985). BonJour uses the concept of "representative content with confidence" to cause a dilemma. Metaphorical content is the content of faith, hope, fear. Faith, hope, fear may be the same; people can believe in rain, hope for rain, or worry about rain. All of these states have the same representative content. Representative content of confidence is expressed as actual content, but in reality it may be wrong. A good example of confident content is coming from the Müller-Lyer illusion. In this known experiment, the subject passes through two vertical lines, ie they have the same length, but their lengths are not equal. The subject's experience indicates that the content is not equal. In light of the concept of representative content that has confidence, BonJour reexplains Silas's predicament: Experience representative content that is confident both. If your experience contains representative content that you trust, you need another reason to believe that the content is correct. However, if experiences lack such content, we can not provide any reason for believing that an experienced proposition is correct. This dilemma mainly focuses on non-executive fundamentalism and believing that regardless of how we fulfill this view, we can not prove that experience is the correct basis for justification It is customary. Weak fundamentalism is an interesting form of fundamentalism. Lawrence BonJour presents this view as a possible fundamentalist view in his book (1985), "The Structure of Empirical Knowledge". According to BonJour's view, weak fundamentalists believe that some non-speculative beliefs are minimalistically rational and that such reasons are not sufficient to satisfy the justification of knowledge. In addition, this reason is not sufficient to make personal beliefs a necessary condition to keep other beliefs (see BonJour (1985), 30). But since knowledge and reasoning are fundamental features of our cognitive practice, the natural conclusion of weak fundamentalism is that consistency among our beliefs requires sufficient reason for knowledge, and one belief That is the premise of other beliefs. . Therefore, for weak fundamentalists, consistency plays an irreplaceable role in knowledge and reasoning.

The age of enlightenment was an age of scientific awakening; the era of enlightenment mainly developed in France. The starting point for Enlightenment is John Locke's book on human understanding. Enlightenment attacked church leaders and focused on problems that were avoided in the past. Trying to challenge the church requires courage. Illuminati asked people "Earth is the center of the universe." There are four major areas of change, religion, intellectuals, economics, politics. From the Middle Ages to the Enlightenment and the Enlightenment of the 19th century and the 19th century, the evolution of knowledge has changed dramatically. From the 17th century to the 18th century to the 19th century, the era of enlightenment was regarded as a cultural movement of intellectuals. It is said that it began to spread to American colonies of Continental Europe. This is by purpose https://www.studymode.com/subjects/which-labels-for-the-middle-ages-best-describe-the-era-between-500-and-1400-in-europe-the-dark-ages- Feudal age of Europe's most faithful, or most golden age ages - page 1. Html Labels and research papers label "What is the best medieval beliefs describing the era of the feudalism of the golden era of the European 500 to 1400 or the European dark era era" Well, men and women, preparation for enlightenment. In this lesson we will introduce Enlightenment. what is that? Enlightenment is sometimes called "era of enlightenment", emphasizing rationality, individualism and skepticism, the 17th century intellectual movement and the late 18th century. Enlightenment challenged the traditional religious view. The Enlightenment was such a broad movement, so there was no exact start date. I did not pop up, but it gradually developed. Most historians set the beginning of the Enlightenment from the middle of the 17th century to the beginning of the 18th century. The work of intellectuals such as Rene Descartes, Barus Spinoza, Isaac Newton is particularly important for the creation of the Enlightenment. Jean-Baptiste Poquelin Moliere wrote Tartuffe at the beginning of Enlightenment's era. A major characteristic of the awareness era was promotion of rationality over emotions for decision making. The Enlightenment leaders truly believe that the world will be better if people do this. In Tartov, when a character makes decisions using his emotions, they feel that they are in a bad state. And those feelings dominate them

Regardless of whether the body and the mind are the same, or whether they are two different entities, they live in the same space in a sense. This is a philosophical question, and there is no doubt that many people are trying to find out the answer. The mind is the center of our whole existence. Our idea helps us understand the world around us and the people inside us. The mind is our desire for subconsciousness and consciousness, all enclosed in a neat little package. Our idea is our hope and dream to promote us in our lives and to provide our goals for our actions in our daily life. Further isolation of individuals, In addition, Descartes will divide his solid unity. Descartes separates and separates the mind from the body (I think (mind), therefore I (physical, exist)) or the concept of the spirit and soul of the West from the body (thought, consciousness) Continue to divide. Since Freud further broke it, thought / thinking itself is divided or divided into various elements. - Include Descartes' radical skepticism (inductive reasoning) and empiricism (science emphasizes observable measurable facts) and psychology fields in Plato / Aristotle / religious deduction analysis. Thought is an abstract place, and Freud's theory is based on analysis and abstract logical guesses rather than focusing on the theory which is easy to observe, measure, quantify, test and verify. The mind calms down, pure, unified, and removes the distracting flow of thought. Through intelligent training, focused attention focuses on thinking and physical elements and investigates and reflects their unique characteristics. This wisdom gradually matured, reached the climax of understanding, and brought complete purification and spiritual dissolution. As a general rule, all three-step road exercises are feasible for anyone in any industry. The Buddha taught it to amateurs and monks, and many of his non-experts have reached a very high stage. But for those who fully received mental training and fully appreciate all other issues to live in "brahmacariya", the development of this path has become most effective.

Introduction Aristotle (384 BC - 322 BC) is a Greek philosopher. He is a student of Plato and a teacher of Alexander the Great. Together with other Greek philosophers like Plato and Socrates, he is considered one of the most important figures in Western philosophy. Educational philosophy "Everyone who meditates on human art believes that the fate of the empire depends on the education of young people." - Aristotle Aristotle is considered to be the father of realism and scientific method. Thomas Aquinas (around 1225 - 7 March 1274) incorporated Aristotle's philosophy into Christianity and established a Christian philosophy on the philosophical foundation of Christianity. This had a decisive influence on Aristotle's influence on Western history. By the death of Aristotle in 322 BC, the classical philosophy ended until the 3 rd century AD was called the Hellenistic era. In the first half of this period (until the middle of the 1st century BC), practical philosophy became flourishing, the three developed school styles or philosophy styles were stoicism, epicureanism, skepticism. In the second half of the Greek era, religious orientation was adopted and New Platonism was admired. Research on Aristotle's philosophy has influenced the thought of the late Neo-Renaissance. One of the main focus of Aristotle's philosophy is the concept of his systemic logic. Aristotle's goal is to propose a universal process of reasoning that allows people to learn everything possible about reality. The initial process describes objects based on object characteristics, presence state, and actions. In his philosophical paper Aristotle is also discussing ways human beings can get information about things through deductions and reasoning. For Aristotle, reasoning is a reasonable argument, his deductive theory that "when one is decided, the other must appear for their existence" is what philosophers are now calling The basis of syllabic theory is logical. Arguments for inferring conclusions from two or more other forms of some premise

Hume David Hume provided a well thought out plan for the formation of the government and its political activities. In addition, he acknowledged that certain government citizens may resist in special circumstances. But in terms of obedience and dishonesty, Hume did not give official revolutionary rules. We hope that Hume has more about the revolution and, more specifically, he believes there is a reason to carry out the revolution. Several authors like Richard H. Diss found the basis of Hume's explanation of a legitimate revolution in his historical research. Hume's report on the political turmoil of the 17th century was heavily dependent on the history of British rebellion and the Civil War of Earl of Clarendon (1646-69). Generally, Hume employs the position of a moderate royalist and believes that the revolution does not need to carry out necessary reforms. Hume is considered a conservative historian and emphasizes religious differences over constitutional problems. Laird Okie explained that "Hume is spreading the gentle virtue of politics but it is anti-frig, moderate anti-kinematic." Stuart is nothing beyond their predecessors. " "Hume wrote an anti-wage hostile action, but the paradox is that it is correct to regard a kind of established work and history that implicitly supports the control of the oligarchy regime." Historians believe that Hume is universal I have argued whether it has human nature or whether it allows evolution and development. Hume's epistemology David Hume is a Scottish philosopher known for his skepticism and empiricism. Hume strives to develop John Rock 's empiricism better through scientific research on our humanity. If we do not clarify this problem, we can not rely on common sense to explain human behavior. In other words, Hume said that it is urgent to observe how humans do this because humans are actually living and working in this world. The main John Locke, Berkeley, Hume are both empiricist philosophers. They all have different opinions but I agree with three things; the only source of real knowledge is unreliable inappropriate knowledge paths unless it is based on a solid foundation of sensual experience Some evidence shows that natural thinking in the mind is learned from experience. Every philosopher has developed some of the most attractive concepts.

Do you remember Frankswin's speech for skeptics depicting today's skeptical movements more and more distinctively, hostile, discouraging, and focusing on preaching primarily to choirs? An article recently released by the Guardian newspaper keeps this lecture in mind and seems to be beginning to explain British skeptical activists in the same uncompromising way as Swin. There is only a slight distortion. The author acknowledges suspicious bait habits to draw our attention, and I think all skeptics agree. Alom Shaha thinks that we are not trying to reach out to the people who have been used so far and can not regain them or make money from this universe. You should focus on people who shape your world view and open truly heart. A new Kindle e-book, a skeptical skeptic: an essay selected from the website, including contributions from SPR members. Contributors of Skeptical About Skeptics are Robert McLuhan, Dean Laden, Rupert Sheldrake, Graham Nichols, Guy Lyon Play Fair, Nancy Ginelone, Ted Darth, Daniel Dracin and Alex Tzakilis. Before I investigate your claim, you have to find at least 4 videos and articles suspected of that claim and add them to the Flipboard Magazine. Read skeptical articles you found (or watched the video) and add at least three Flipboard comments at the end of each article. When you start analyzing the evidence of a believer in your claim, your opinion should state the idea or fact that you most want to remember. When collecting materials, care must be taken to distinguish between doubt and refusal. When scientists, historians, or other researchers present strong evidence (based on scientific methods) and conclude that the assertion is correct, some people expressed it without providing new evidence continue. They call "skepticism". These people are "denial", not skeptics. People who deny the Holocaust, or among people who landed in the lunar or climate change in 1968

We will explore various attitudes toward marriage in pride and prejudice. In the era of Jane Austen, marriage was mainly based on charm and compatibility. Women have the right to choose their husbands, but the status of society and wealth is an important part of their decision. In "pride and prejudice" we see many different attitudes and reasons for marrying in one sex. Jane Austen grew up in a family I love to read novels. This is a new writing concept different from poetry and drama. Compare and contrast various attitudes toward marriage represented by different personality of pride and prejudice. "Pride and prejudice" is one of the most famous novels in British literature history. Created by famous writer Jane Austin in 1813, his novel examines the nature of love. The overall tone of the novel is very light but serious. Proud and prejudice is a loving story about marriage. - Q: Compare and contrast the two proposals and their responses of Elizabeth. A. In "pride and prejudice", Elizabeth, the main female character, is very proud of the main male character Darcy. This is because at the first meeting, Elizabeth's pride was hurt because he said that he was harmed by Darcy. Results are brought. Cady Davis Bradshaw ENG 261 Dancing in the dialogue of "pride and prejudice" on October 9, 2014. In "Pride and Prejudice", Elizabeth Bennett and Darcy changed dramatically their attitudes towards each other. Darcy is dedicated to Elizabeth, but she denied this because of its low rank with the family. Elizabeth believes that Darcy is arrogant and interferes. Through the dialogue of these characters, they discovered real concern for each other. - David Hume is a Scottish philosopher living in the 18th century. Hume is now at the turning point of philosophy by infamous skepticism. He insisted that he was a moderate skeptic, but all philosophers later felt the result of his argument. His criticism has influenced various themes that Hume seems to eradicate. One of the themes that Hume attacks against his argument is the concept of individual identity.

When food addicts announce that they have found delicious new foods, they usually say to you that the first or second one is a secret ingredient or special technique that enables it. The weakness of these discoveries may be exciting for our people, at least excited by the opportunities brought about by the next new item of food. Ultimately, cooking is alchemy, transforming basic materials into precious and rare things. Who does not want to know the latest spell? But especially in restaurants, eating ignorance and happiness, and something not told about food on your dish - it is sometimes equally magical - unless you are obsessive-compulsive obstacles, of course it is It is necessary to know why so tasty. So, on a recent night, I ate a small blue squid at a restaurant in Manhattan at Houseman, Chef Ned Baldwin. I will clarify from the beginning. Steaming of squid is not a promising order. People in the restaurant tend to prefer shameless fish at the edge, not at least steaming. They prefer white meat and flakes behind soft plant material, they are dark and not greasy But the Baldwin fish was wonderful and barely exploded: it was strongly rounded which is hardly checked by salty, butter, silky and salty, the sweetness of the dessert surrounding it. It bothered me for a couple of days, and finally I broke down and asked how to do it to Baldwin. "This is an impulsive butter," he said with a smile. Lettuce of unsalted butter and ground-dried sea captured on the coast of Ireland and the North Atlantic coast for centuries for centuries in its original state. origin). Before wrapping in a charcoal fire, he said, spread each fillet fillet to a baking sheet, then cook slowly in the oven and often package to moisten the meat. I always start cooking at Duluth. Especially now, when the farm near my house is rough and basically free, I use dulse (and butter) to give me a wonderful taste of cooking, everyone is not smart. I use it like a Baldwin to spread Salmon and Totgg, Porgy and Weekfish's fillets. I use it as an immersion source used for steaming and as a medium for scallops in a warm bay and then are served with toast. I especially like chowder of this kind of root crop, leek and fish. It is one of the easiest and best to eat in the winter weekend. Duluth butter at the bottom of the soup, using the fat you ate before removing the vegetables, from carrot to green onion, obviously vivid effect, popularize each taste in the resulting Chowder wind protection in Europe Grass to potatoes, bacon scallops go fishing And why this happens, how to explain how the powdered algae acts as a flavor enhancer, how it contains natural type glutamate, how it is harvested from the rock from the bottom of the tide I do not think so. : Darcy, Palmaria palmata, blessings of the sea. In a sense, this is because I like the meal magic to explain the technique for making it. And to the extent of this, like many of us, I cook for children, sometimes cook like children, for those new, strange, strange, poor brands, strangers People of seaweed are familiar with this. There is no reason to ask a question. They did not say that they were cooking in Darcy. They just cook The downside about this is that people can eat as much as you are explaining and do not like what they are doing, but the difference is - and I think you can do it I do not - every day complaints and skepticism Do not like what you are seeing, do not like what you are doing, just complain about everything. In my opinion, they never get over my limits, help me work hard for what I want and never complain about what happened with me. We have the ability to change it, we all have I can not change the world, I do not know where to start from, I hope that someone will tell me what to do. I thought "Someone needs to solve this problem" when I was waiting for a hero, a person stronger than my life to solve this problem. ", We care about average users who need a safe conversation with fri

Writing skills exercises: Life skill paper - Read articles on life skills Practice and practice to improve writing skills 2. Some say that school should teach life skills, others think that young people can learn these skills at home ___________ School has many opportunities to improve the way we work with other people. Learning to cook, ___________, more special resources and specialized courses required ________________________________________________________________________________________________ Living There is controversy about opposed to supporting at a steady place in a school education site. â € | â € | â € | â € |. Today, many schools insist on including life skills and more traditional subjects. Some people say this is not necessary, while this says that students will better prepare for the real world. â € | â € | â € | â € |. On the other hand, there are still a lot of things to do at school, some teachers and students say that they do not have time. They believe that other household chores, such as teaching cooking and school ironing, require a lot of time and resources. However, in most cases, we think that we can learn useful life skills as well as traditional subjects. â € | â € | â € | â € |. In short, I think that schools should teach life skills as much as possible with traditional subjects. This is very beneficial for students to prepare for adult life. â € | â € | â € | â € |. Many people believe that mastery of life skills at school is the best way to prepare students for adults. Skills such as finance management, teamwork, time sorting are important to the real world, and not everyone has the opportunity to learn this knowledge at home. 1. Today, there are schools that change the timetable to provide such as life skills and more traditional subjects. Some people say that this will prepare students better for real life, say _______________ others do not need 4. Skills _______________ As managerial funds, teamwork and organization time is important to the real world. 6. While thinking about traditional subjects, I think that we learned many life skills at school. For _______________, we will learn teamwork skills through group projects ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 5 There are cases where you think that you can not add it to school in school. _______________ 8. I believe that I am a professor at the school and should be a traditional subject and life skill What do you think is the most useful thing you learned in school? Can schools be prepared completely in the real world? Skills If you teach practical skills, you need to clarify points in both verbal and written form and to provide participants with exercises to practice their skills. We need to emphasize how someone uses the skills you teach and why. You need to take time to ask a lot of questions and plan to tackle the skepticism of those who are satisfied with the way they do things. Knowledge If you teach or summarize what you are doing, you need to ask that point verbally and again. Because participants do not absorb all the content you convey, repeatedly emphasizing key points and participating participants in discussions, games, or exercises emphasizes key points. Materials written to help participants update and maintain knowledge after the workshop is important Writing practice You can use the computer if the room is equipped or if the participant is carrying a laptop or using a laptop (participants have them). Again, please restrict exercise to a few minutes. Later let some participants read some of the things they wrote (in pairs or across the group) and ask them to discuss what they have learned from practice. Interest has increased due to competition. I will divide the team into games and competition teams. Maybe you can design some questions about the

Due to this long-term insult, it is as smart as a title, a short long story of modernism architecture. Flat roofs and glass boxes are not practical and the designer's exhilarating rhetoric method, Le Corbusier's unconstructed (and poorly constructed) building, Gropius's miter abstinent, etc. are mostly normal is. , Mies and uniform blinds / curtains / shadows, sterile office buildings, inhumane housing projects, white wall integration of believers' residences - delivery only, not criticized or joking this time, scornful. There are two complaints of wolves: these are all conscious, they are "non-bourgeoisie" ("spirit of the 20th century avant-garde"), which is "not American", "unforgettable baroque" It is not faithful American civilization is prosperous. "Initially unsafe American architects rushed to Bauhaus to study, after which camp followers Philip Johnson and Henry Russell-Hitchcock announced the arrival of an" international style "; And in 1937, Gropius and Co. ("Unfounded, exhausted, unmanned, man without a country, the fate of encounter") - What did we do? We have fallen into their faces, making them school leaders, modernism as a new gospel, downgrading Frank Lloyd Wright, banning apostates (like Edward Durel Stone) and building did. A troublesome box. Robert Venturi revealed the complexity and contradiction in modern architecture (1966), not to overthrow non-bourgeois faith, but to update it with reference to the history of his camp. For postmodernists, this is misnomer: they still gathered in "compound" (said to be the basic feature of modernism - even the Kolbs have Iris brothers) and are still boxed. In short, this is annoying to almost every spleen. For Wolf, modernism seems to be a fundamental way. But there will be readers - Wolf fans, and people who still feel the threat of these glass boxes even after 60 years have passed Skepticism about modernism is not limited to the UK. In the United States, Tom Wolf wrote from Bauhaus to our house, from Bauhaus directly to the United States to explain the Prince of European silver, he wrote that he built houses that look like worker's house and pesticide factory. Reliable point He suggested that any attempt to actually sit on the Le Corbusier's reclining chair would adopt karate behind his neck. "In modernism attacks on inhumane behavior, and in the extreme case anything that can be filled with contemporary nicknames has concluded that modernism can not find beauty and that it is not worth it. I thought, "Wilk said. The mind still believes in the early moral mission of modernists. Therefore, the crime of a concrete tower where Le Corbusier's design is inadequate and construction is inadequate has little to do with his work. The wolf suddenly came to our house from Bauhaus and finished his question. But the answer is in its early stages, Wolff explained the first principle that Gropius and his colleagues built Bauhaus. They were so excited by the new industrial era and they named themselves as Prince. I think there are many designers close to many things today, but that is more than just the possibilities of new materials and manufacturing processes. Design enthusiasm, such as behavioral interventions, nudging in the "correct" direction of people, most people meaning "right" or supporting loyalty, is one example of the same impulses leading to machines is. To survive This is synonymous with a hero designer, bring new knowledge to customers, educate customers, and improve customer hobbies. Walter Gropius and other Bauhaus teachers and graduates play Moses' role and can acquire knowledge that has not been washed from the mountain even if it is not washed. I passed the director of the Yale museum. Designers have problems as a convincing taste maker. Mr. Wolf said how modernist luxury clients feel dissatisfied with the design of architects and how people working in modernist architecture impose restrictions on their "living machines" I often speak about what. For Grop

"Eager, it's like an album composed of B side, I lost the demonstration track, and you stumbled upon it and could not stop playing." "The true primitive of the same summer sea, a thorough examination of the composition of creativity and genius, a story about vision and mediocrity, the constant tension between consistency and celebrities." "Incredible, horrible honesty. Even complicated and moving meditation about credibility and self-recognition. "Fasbender provides beautiful performance, this strange, authentic, gentle movie will be unforgettable." "Frank takes time to wrap the skull, the faults, and all of these, it's great, Fasbinder offers grief and a fragile moment." "This is one of its most challenging goals - and we prove that Fassbender may be the only actor to effectively demonstrate from a carnival parade." "It's so unique that the story is visually convincing and the movie can only be made to make emotional code." "This extreme extreme experience, and intense original movies are a strong observation of adventurous audiences, which is different from what we saw in recent memories." "After the motive of the movie has been revealed you will have Frank for a long time and this will appeal to those who appreciate rough gems." "A new rotation in the case of rock and rolling, the last moving portrait of the artist contradicts audience conflicts, and an impressive continuous observation on how genius works through keyhole" "You will be grabbing your movie, the wonderful performance of Michael Fassbinder provides a second part that is shocking and moving, the rating is 10 points." "Excellent quirky black comedy," Frank "creates an immortal world that will not disappear for a long time even after the movie is over. " "A witty wonderful musical comedy, Abrahamson skeptically thinks skepticism, attracts them in a surreal way and takes him to a moving place." "I can see one of the most amazing films for a long time, if you just look and experience, that's the best." "Very interesting, clever and impressive original, and one of the most fascinating performances of Michael Fassbinder ever, Frank has everything, not to want Mr. Frank. Is not attractive, and that's a big problem never interferes with destructive black comedy, fascinating dramas and great music One of the beautiful end of deep touch and tears. Michael Fassbinder plays the band leader Frank with an unusual celebrity character wearing large paper avatars throughout the movie just as Frank Sheddbert wears. Director Lenny Abrahamson said Fassbender is "very comfortable" headed and he also likes to participate in it. Maggie Gyllenhaal plays Clara Wagner, Frank often acts as an active partner, and he plays women with Korg MS - 20. Gyllenhaal initially refused the role and said he did not understand, but that story bothered her, so changed his mind a few weeks later. Before the filming began, Gillen Hall decided to act as though Clara was the true love of Frank, Frank 's head is difficult. Abrahamson's fourth movie "Frank" is a young musician who starred Doman Gleason, Michael Fas vendor, Maggie Gyllenhaal and caught in avant-garde pop band led by mysterious Frank with the same name The tale of. He always wears a huge fake head. Frank made a debut at the 2014 Sundance Film Festival. EMMA DONOGHUE (Screenwriter / New Artist) was born in Dublin in 1969 and currently lives in Canada. She wrote a novel, a history, a radio, a stage, a movie drama. She is best known as her international bestseller, the finalists of the Man Booker and the Orange Awards, and the winners of Commonwealth (Canada / Caribbean), Rogers Writers Trust and Hughes and Hughes Irish Annual Fiction Awards. Her novel is a fairy tale (kiss witch) from contemporary things (saute, hooded, landing, delicate theme) to history (Slammerkin, birth of the rabbit, life mask, sealed letters, and lost) To a wide range.

Mr. Whitson teaches the science of the sixth grade. On the first day of the class, he said to us the creature called cattywampus, this is an inappropriate night's action wiped out during the ice ages. When he spoke, he circumvented the skull. We all took a note and tested it later I was shocked when he returned my paper. Each of my answers has a big red X. I failed. There should be some errors. I wrote exactly what Whitson said. Then I noticed that everyone in the classroom failed. What's wrong? Very simple, Mr. Whitson explained. He has made everything about cattywampus. There was never such an animal. Therefore, the information in our note is incorrect. Do you expect us to get the wrong answer? Mr. Whitson said that we should have figured it out. After all, at every moment he passed the skull of cattywampus (actually a cat), he told us that there is no trace of animals? He explained that amazing night vision, its fur color, and other facts he could not know. He gave the animals a ridiculous name, and we still have no doubt. He said that zero of our paper will be recorded in his gradebook. They are Mr. Whitson said that we wanted to be able to learn something from this experience. Teachers and textbooks should not be at risk. In fact, there is no one. He told us not to sleep our thoughts, if you think he or the textbook is wrong, say that. Each class has risks with Mr. Whitson. I remember scientific time from almost the beginning to the end. That day he told us that his Volkswagen is a living creature. It took us two full days to accept the objection he would accept. He is confusing us until we prove that we have a strong patience to support the truth as well as prove that we know what the organism is. We have new skepticism about all courses. This poses problems for other teachers who are not used to being challenged. Our history teacher will talk about something, then there will be a clear throat, someone will say "cattywampus". If you are asked to suggest a solution to our school problem, that is Mr. Whitson. Although there was not much scientific discovery, me and my classmates did the same important thing in Mr. Whitson's course. He also showed us that you can enjoy it. Not everyone saw this value. I used to tell Mr. Whitson to my elementary school teacher. The teacher was shocked. "He should not deceive you that way," he said. I looked into the teacher's eyes and told him he was wrong. My best teacher ever was Mr. Jack Herr, my 8th grade science teacher, Mr. Jack Herr. He is the most interesting person in my life, and all classes are so funny I actually learned science. He is a man who really understands me and has dramatically changed my life. He is always doing interesting things to make me laugh, and he is a surfer, so he is cool and he is a very good painter. But this year is over and his year is finally at my school soon he moved to Switzerland The last thing I got from him was the CD he made for me. He is the best man I know and the best teacher ever. I have many kinds of teachers, but there are two teachers who are more conspicuous than others. The first one is my 3rd and 6th grade teachers. She is the best teacher I have ever met. The second one is my seventh grade teacher. She is the worst I think students can do. The teaching methods of these two teachers are very different and teaching methods are very different. In order to become an effective teacher, teachers need to respect their students and hope to double their efforts to help students learn as much as possible. In this article, I will explain the difference between the effect of these two teachers and their teaching style. The best teacher I had in the past showed them passionately on the subject (sociology) she taught. When I think of 'good teachings', she is what I think. She thought about an interactive and fun way to teach her perspective. Students are always actively participating in discussions. She likes teaching

I. There is Stonehenge in the Salisbury Plain in southern England. This is the most famous of all megalithic ruins. Stonehenge is unique among the monuments of the ancient world. Stonehenge challenges our imagination with a windy plain built by people without written words. The impressive Stone Circle is situated on a gently sloping hill of the Salisbury Plain, about 30 miles from the British Strait. These stones are visible in the mountains, one or two miles in each direction. Stonehenge is one of the more than 50,000 prehistoric "rocks" in Europe. As Stonehenge approached, 40 mega - stones seemed to touch the sky. Most stones are above 24 feet. Some stones weigh up to 40 tons. The other is smaller and weighs only 5 tons. At first glance, these jewels seem to be in a natural shape. However, if you look closely, only human imagination and determination can produce Stonehenge. II. Today 's Stonehenge looks very different from ancient Stonehenge. Wind and weather destroyed some Stonehenge for years. People have destroyed more Today, less than half of the rough is still planned by their builder. There were many stones that were erected before them. The religious fanatic who felt the mysterious threat brought by Stonehenge knocked down many of the standing stones. They crushed a few large stones and then crushed it finely; they buried the others Over the centuries, other stones have been "quenched" as free building materials and have been driven. Even in this century, tourists will take stones with a hammer III. Only in recent years, stone has been protected from the large number of people who view them annually. Nobody can walk around the stone. Hundreds of thousands of visitors already had excessively intentional or unintentional harm. Today, tourists are even hindered walking between the stones, as millions of footprints are annoying about stone instability every year. IV. The 12th century British writer and historian, Jeffrey of Monmouth, for the first time recorded the Merlin Stonehenge architecture in his famous "King's Kingdom History". Jeffrey claims that his book is a translation of "an ancient book written in English". But other scholars and historians do not know the existence of such books. According to Jeffrey, these rocks are brought from Ireland to the UK and commemorate the burial site of the group of the British prince who was murdered. From Stonehenge, Jeffrey became a Kingdom of England and a Holy Land of the people of the English feelings. Under well-known circumstances, Stonehenge decided that it will be the end of the Tudor era until exploration, speculation, and skepticism, but was not entirely intriguing and was always proposed in the 17th century Remove the historical heritage of Regum Britanniae. Other Explanations Welsh began a long story with confidence and speculation - often contradictory, sometimes crazy - and Stonehenge was obscured. In 'News Chronicle' on 19th November 19, three bold headlines such as the first explosion of hydrogen bomb explosion were still inactive. Please recognize that Stonehenge is by tourist. From historians to interested students, the existence of Stonehenge in southern England has attracted a lot of people's attention for various reasons. History, material aspects, and tourism make it as memorable as people explained Stonehenge. A mysterious but funny area has become one of the most unique places in the UK. Since there is no concrete idea on how Stonehenge was built and why, I have led many people who theorize Stonehenge. Stonehenge Stonehenge and Easter Island Stonehenge and Easter Island are two very old and interesting mysteries and monuments in the world. Stonehenge in the outskirts of Salisbury, England is made of plenty of grass and huge gray stones. The place was made between 1520 BC and 3000 BC. There are many reasons why Stonehenge is made. Stonehenge was built using precise construction phase. An archaeologist says it may have been

In Homer's epic "Odyssey", Odysseus returned to Ithaca in disguised form. He revealed his true identity to his son, Telemakhos, and other people necessary to help him kill the followers. But Odysseus did not reveal himself to his wife Penelope. She believed herself as a lonely husband and chose not to reveal his true identity. Penelope did this because she realized that her husband is in danger in the current environment if she wants to reveal who he really is. Therefore, she does not seem to know that Odysseus is Odysseus. But in the book she says she knows that she is her husband. In the morning light you smash him with a bath and let him eat at the hall next to Telemakhos. "(P.363 ln 375-380) is very strange in the treatment of cockroaches emerging in her house as she was trying to fight over 100 other guests for many years.Telemakhos even for Penello Such treatment is not true for such guests, "How about a nurse, dear nurse, how do you treat our guests?" He has a good bed for dinner Do you have? Has he not paid attention yet? This is the case of my mother, it is common sense for all of her wisdom ...? "(P. 379 ln 146 - 149). Telemacos' comments show that Penelope was not as kind as a guest in the past, so she is such a bond with such worry and sympathy I am now becoming more and more dubious that she is actually her husband Odysseus. From the beginning, Penelope had more convincing evidence in 19 books that Odysseus bathed Odysseus' feet. When Penelope told him to wash his feet, Odysseus rejected it unless he can do it. And since it is a smart maid, Penelope chose Eurykleia. Bathing the feet of Odysseus, Yuri Kleia found a big scar on his thigh and thought he was Odysseus in his childhood accident. But even before that she will comment on her comments. For Penelope, there are many controversies over her denial that she disguises her husband Odysseus. Penelope intuitively knows that Odysseus is awkward, but Odysseus comes up with a wise way to guarantee that he claims to be "fair and fair", because he does not want the followers to place a red flag. It was. This kind of perception may not be done immediately, but at some point after talking to you I think Penelope thinks this is awkward. Odyssey 19.1. That night, Penelope asked about the old man disguised as the descendant of Odysseus. He did not reveal himself to Odysseus. Odysseus 's elderly nurse, Yuri Craya, washed the strangers' feet, but she acknowledged that he must be Odysseus. She saw this cockroach "with the same foot scars as Odysseus and his grandfather Autolykos hunting wild boars" pretending to be the most skilled thief in the world. " Olivis got his name; name Odysseus means "angry child") Odysseus threatens to kill and death of Olympia if she reveals her identity to Penelope or other people. As a sliced ​​camouflage, Odysseus studied his palace. Because Odysseus faithfully coordinated Penelope's loyalty to other me, the pursuer and some of his old servants were generally treated rude. Penelope noticed the similarity between this cockroach and her husband who might be dead, she proposed the game. An ax 's pursuer. Only Odysseus can achieve this feat. He grabbed a bow and arrow, shot the tracker Antinous, and revealed his identity. Telemachus, Eumaeus, and his shepherd Philoitios stood beside him, Odysseus led the tracker massacre only with Athena's last aid. Odysseus and Penelope rejoiced kindly, made evidence in bed, and overcame her skepticism about being a fraudster. Outside the city, Odysseus visited his sick father, Leltus, but the group of relatives' relatives found them soon.

In two great expressive poetries in America, free verses fired: a transcendental movement in the middle of the 19th century, including Henry David Thoreau, influenced in the 1950s and 1960s, Beatnik Alan Ginsburg, Gregory Poetry when Kosso, aging is an influencer William Carlos Williams and other people occupied the central stage. Indeed, hundreds of high school teachers and college poet professors can thank for free poetry - and free-form free poetry written by folk musicians in the 1960s - to encourage students to write poems . Compared to other forms of poetry, free verses can feel liberation. A line has no specific number of syllables or rhymes; the section is not affected by the standard number of lines. In fact, poetry is not binding at all, and many free verses have a single section of thousands of words. The movement of free verse depends on the natural rhythm rather than the imposed pattern. As D. Lawrence wrote, the poet "can get rid of the stereotype of exercise". Free poetry seems to be modernistic, but its roots can go back to medieval scriptures and even the Bible. The Bible "Song of Songs" is written in what we call now free poetry. Many of the earliest ancient Greek poets were writing syllables and music in ways that were not measurable, and they were developing lyrics. But later in ancient Greece and Rome, formal form like Carol, epic, and various measured lyrics dominated land of literature. The promise of irregular rhythm continued to attract non-traditional and narrative poets, and began to appear in the 19th century French poet Jules La Foldze and Gustav Kant. John Wolfgang von Goethe in Germany also tried free poetry. By the second half of the century, Walter Whitman mastered this form as well as a minstrel like Christina Rosetti, Robert Louis Stevenson, Charles Borrer, Gerrard Manley Hopkins and W.E. Henry is writing a free poem. However, it was not that time that Richard Aldington made the English name using the word "free verse" in election in 1915. But as TS Eliot warned, "Poetry is not free for those who want to do a good job." Free poetry is irregular and lyrical and is not affected by lines or festivals. Measurement, but the accuracy of rhythm and rhythm is as important as other forms of poetry We are used to finding rhymes and meters in English poetry, but Hebrew poetry is different. The Hebrew poems are characterized by parallelism. For explanation, parallelism can be seen if more than two Hebrew poems correspond closely to each other. There are three main parallel processes in Hebrew poetry. Parallel processing of synonyms, the opposite of parallel processing, and parallel processing of synthesis. Parallel processing of synonyms is probably the most comprehensible one. Parallel processing of synonyms expresses the same thing in various ways and tells its teachings. It is not one of the books of wisdom, but Jesus prayed in Matthew 6: 13, "To save us from sin, not to tempt us." Prayer allows us to pray to God in the same way in two different ways. That is, he will protect us from a complete attack of evil. Parallel does not mean that the Lord can seduce us (see James 1: 13). Brunosner explains the sentimentalism of the poet of the egalism as an exaggerated miraculous thought. Its best representative is Carimacos and the poem does not show that "the early writers who really surprised the children remembered the miracles of life", but "the harmony from the people who studied the lost treasure Height of skepticism that expressed spirit ". In Kalimakos hymns, this double consciousness is achieved through a group of narrators that the story should not be understood as a poem that satisfies his own poetry, but should be understood as an agent's appearance. I gained the role of natural guardian, witness, and avenger.

Trick is to understand that we are biological social creatures. Since it is entirely inherent in our survival instincts, instincts are burned to our most primitive core level, making this seed permanent There is no defense against the external stimulus that we need to keep wise. Hard shells and negative emotional strategies inevitably make everything worse. There are several ways to deal with us to strengthen and make it safer and more efficient. They are all related to introspection and self-recognition (I was told that it is now the writer of emotional intelligence most frequently used from Quora, yes, this is very necessary for me There is no theme). It is forever, but always will not live from inside to outside, from outside to outside. Finally, society is not a way to deal with us but influences us in a way to deal with us. That's all - the rest is detailed. The meaning of life is to learn and consider the essence of these details before exiting. These details are very important. And once you know that it moves in this direction, you can find them yourself. Some of the most important oversights do not indulge in cynicism. eternally. But skepticism is important. All what we do must have some elements of love, otherwise it will not be worth it. This includes the ambassadors listed here (basically the ambassadors composed of love, sincere, dedication, respect, honesty, honesty (especially self), courage). Other people you find. Passionate curiosity, open mind, humor and creativity will give you all important things. The trick to master these details is to abandon all of these details, actively and proactively doing so. Sounds difficult, but it is not so. The smallest step in this direction is now considered a microcosm forming all these things. In other words, it will be easy even if you continue the test. It is terrible, is not it? It's more exciting. The necessity of doing this and the real signs of pleasure are as follows. If a person can have absolute (infinite hope from elves), forever - moment - how long does life take to lose all meaning, purpose or joy? Does society fully determine our beliefs, actions, and opportunities for life? No individual differences are still important, and psychology and other fields certainly require the most comprehensive understanding of human behavior and beliefs. However, if individual differences are important, the social background from which society and us derive is also important. Even the most personal attitudes and behaviors such as the voting decisions above will be influenced to some extent by our social background and more widely by the society we belong to. For centuries, social rules have influenced people's behavior. But what happens when you oppose social rules? What happens when people have freedom and independence is more important than achieving social expectations. - Kate Chopin provides readers with a wealth of information on just a few pages through her short stories "One Hour Story". The main character, Luis Marado, in her epiphany, realized a lot of romantic relationships and mistakes in marriage. "Tell the news of her husband's death as gently as possible" (Chopin 168). Josephine and Richards rarely know that this news has a widespread positive influence rather than adversely affecting Lewis. From internal influences to social norms, there are many factors that influence our behavior. Social norms are an implicit or clear rule that leads our behavior in society (Maluso, class notes). The social norm is more influential for us than someone else understands, but we all realize that the norm is broken. It is not easy to break social norms, but often we feel uncomfortable, regardless of whether we break the rules or others are breaking. - Learning obstacles are a group of disorders that may affect the ability of an individual to receive, process, save, and respond to information. These difficulties can not be explained by health, culture or environm

Some of the great athletes, entrepreneurs and thinkers have given up because they gave up and no one knows. The process from the winner to the winner is painful, challenging and troublesome, but the final product is precious. No matter how good or bad your life, you can find excuses to give up. But that is another way. If you are looking for a reason to proceed, you can find it as well. Solution: We will have three people in difficult times. Click here to see 3 types of people Behavior is better than eloquence. Finally, even though they listen to what you say, people will see what you are doing. They may not say this, but unfortunately, many people you know would like you to give up. This is because your devotion to the goal reminds them of the possibility of being unrealized. Rather than prove your skepticism is right, stimulate your dedication You know what will happen if you give up - you will arrive where you started. The hard part is that you can expect to see a reward at the end of the game. No matter how much money you pay, the cost to give up your dream will be higher. Let's think about someone who has tried some failed meals. Their beliefs in weight loss ability are weakened each time they actually try to give up. Stopping smoking and persistence is the formation of a habit. What kind of habit do you want to acquire? Solution: Read this article from the inside of the business to understand the various views of the rich and the ordinary people. The harder the challenge is, the more the value of victory increases. The most rewarding outcome in life is not quick or easy. Sadly, many people are not aware that success is coming up. There is no guarantee that there will always be a clear indicator that it has achieved difficult goals. The finish line is near the next corner Set difficult goals, you can stretch you, teach you to persevere, and in the end you can build your own beliefs. This is the process of growing you. Greatness is not taking place overnight, but it is every inches of progress that is struggling to pursue worthy goals. We have only life. When you fight for careers, dreams or something bigger than yourself, you will find passion, passion and happiness to make life a wonderful adventure. What is important is to pinpoint your cause. I do not know the reason for reading 25 laws. * I want to leave emotional poetry by an unknown writer to you. This famous poetry is untitled, but simply called "Do not give up." In order to become a successful person, you should give up a lot of things to stick to one thing to pay attention to. In order to achieve your goal without giving up your dream, you must give up all secondary things unrelated to your life. I like hobbies, watching my favorite TV programs, watching late night sports, going out to picnics with my friends, meeting friends on my birthday or holiday. But you have to give up all these things that you may not be able to contact friends and special friends, but the worst thing about a successful trip is to keep you alone. The third reason is divided for three small reasons. Why can not we never give up? First of all, what you do not give up is a lesson for us. We can learn a lot about what you have. You can try to find the key to the problem more than once. The second reason you can not give up is whether you choose something to choose. This is your challenge. The last reason is that never giving up can exercise our will. This can make your life stronger. If you can do logical answers or even think, it is time to conduct audits of life. You ought not to hate the work that happens every day. Explanatory objective: Reason for completing or creating something, or reason for something. It is not realistic for people to know their purpose and reluctantly awaken to achieve it. By understanding your reasons, you will understand your contribution to society. It is a kind of harm caused by solving yourself and the world. Plea

Dr. Henry Jekyll - a respected physician and colleague Lanyon's friend, and a lawyer Utterson. Jekyll is a seemingly prosperous person who seems to understand a lot in the community and is known for his neat and charitable work. However, as he was young, he was secretly working on ambiguous discouragement and corruption. Jekyll considers this dark side to be a burden and performs experiments aimed at separating his good and evil from each other. Through these experiments he brought the existence of Mr. Hyde and found a way to change himself so that he is completely half of his dark. Mr. Edward Hyde - a strange and disgusting person looking faint. Hyde is violent and cruel, and everyone who saw him explains that he is ugly and distorted - but I can not tell the reason why. The language itself seems to fail around Hyde: he is not a creature in a reasonable world, consciously clear or logical grammar world. Hyde is a dark side of Jekyll, released from the bondage of conscience and released to the world by mysterious medicine. Mr. Gabriel John Utterson - Excellent lawyer respected in the community of London. Utterson is conservative, dignified and even imaginative, but he seems to have sneaky curiosity about the dirtier aspects of life. However, his rationalism prevented him from dealing with the supernatural nature of Jekyll-Hyde's relationship. Utterson is not a scientist, but his friend Lanyon (probably the Victorian society) is a denial of his loyalty and supernaturality to a reasonable interpretation. Dr. Hastie Lanyon - a famous doctor in London, formerly Utterson who was one of Jekyll's close friends. As an expression of rationalism, materialism, and skepticism, Lanyon provides a foil for Jekyll 's mysticism (its attitude and emotion is a totally contrasting role with other personality). His death represents a more general victory of materialism at Dr. Jekyll and Hydite. Mr. Poole - Jekyll 's housekeeper. Mr. Poole was a loyal servant who worked for the doctor for 20 years and when he was convinced that something had happened to Jekyll, his care for his husband ended up giving him help from Utterson I urged you to ask for it. Mr. Enfield - Mr. Uterson's cousin and his lifelong friends. Like Utterson, Enfield officially despises gossip, and in reality these two people often go with them for a long time, but do not say a word. I am confident with the staff of Mr. Guest - Utterson. Guests are also handwritten experts. His skills proved particularly useful when Utterson wanted him to check Hide's handwriting. Hyde's script is the same as Jekyll's script, but it is leaning Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde's strange incident was the first Gothic novel published by Scottish author Robert Louis Stevenson in 1886. This work is also known as Dr. Jekyll and Hyde, Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde's strange case, or simply Jekyll & Hyde. This is about London 's lawyer, Gabriel John Utterson, who investigated the strange event between his old friend, Dr. Henry Jekyll and evil Edward Hyde. The influence of the novel is ... More Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde's hearing impaired Mr. Hyde Dr. Jekyll and Dr. Hyde experienced transformation, transcendence, and illegal era in the strange case of Hide. When Dr. Jekyll was Mr. Hyde, Hyde influenced the lives of several characters in Stevenson's story. In the process of imagining Hyde, the reader was shocked by the amazing performance of Hyde in the physical description. - Schizophrenia and Dr. Jekyll and Hyde's strange case The name of schizophrenia comes from "schizophrenia". "The kidney where the diaphragm is located, the structure that is dominated by the sacral nerve, Greeks believe that the area of ​​the face is the place of thought, or at least the place of emotion (Berle 12) Background of Mr. Jekyll and Hide Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde's strange incident was announced in 1886 and is one of Stevenson's most famous novels. It includes ways in which an individual consists of opposing emotions a

Due to this long-term insult, it is as smart as a title, a short long story of modernism architecture. Flat roofs and glass boxes are not practical and the designer's exhilarating rhetoric method, Le Corbusier's unconstructed (and poorly constructed) building, Gropius's miter abstinent, etc. are mostly normal is. , Mies and uniform blinds / curtains / shadows, sterile office buildings, inhumane housing projects, white wall integration of believers' residences - delivery only, not criticized or joking this time, scornful. There are two complaints of wolves: these are all conscious, they are "non-bourgeoisie" ("spirit of the 20th century avant-garde"), which is "not American", "unforgettable baroque" It is not faithful American civilization is prosperous. "Initially unsafe American architects rushed to Bauhaus to study, after which camp followers Philip Johnson and Henry Russell-Hitchcock announced the arrival of an" international style "; And in 1937, Gropius and Co. ("Unfounded, exhausted, unmanned, man without a country, the fate of encounter") - What did we do? We have fallen into their faces, making them school leaders, modernism as a new gospel, downgrading Frank Lloyd Wright, banning apostates (like Edward Durel Stone) and building did. A troublesome box. Robert Venturi revealed the complexity and contradiction in modern architecture (1966), not to overthrow non-bourgeois faith, but to update it with reference to the history of his camp. For postmodernists, this is misnomer: they still gathered in "compound" (said to be the basic feature of modernism - even the Kolbs have Iris brothers) and are still boxed. In short, this is annoying to almost every spleen. For Wolf, modernism seems to be a fundamental way. But there will be readers - Wolf fans, and people who still feel the threat of these glass boxes even after 60 years have passed Skepticism about modernism is not limited to the UK. In the United States, Tom Wolf wrote from Bauhaus to our house, from Bauhaus directly to the United States to explain the Prince of European silver, he wrote that he built houses that look like worker's house and pesticide factory. Reliable point He suggested that any attempt to actually sit on the Le Corbusier's reclining chair would adopt karate behind his neck. "In modernism attacks on inhumane behavior, and in the extreme case anything that can be filled with contemporary nicknames has concluded that modernism can not find beauty and that it is not worth it. I thought, "Wilk said. The mind still believes in the early moral mission of modernists. Therefore, the crime of a concrete tower where Le Corbusier's design is inadequate and construction is inadequate has little to do with his work. The wolf suddenly came to our house from Bauhaus and finished his question. But the answer is in its early stages, Wolff explained the first principle that Gropius and his colleagues built Bauhaus. They were so excited by the new industrial era and they named themselves as Prince. I think there are many designers close to many things today, but that is more than just the possibilities of new materials and manufacturing processes. Design enthusiasm, such as behavioral interventions, nudging in the "correct" direction of people, most people meaning "right" or supporting loyalty, is one example of the same impulses leading to machines is. To survive This is synonymous with a hero designer, bring new knowledge to customers, educate customers, and improve customer hobbies. Walter Gropius and other Bauhaus teachers and graduates play Moses' role and can acquire knowledge that has not been washed from the mountain even if it is not washed. I passed the director of the Yale museum. Designers have problems as a convincing taste maker. Mr. Wolf said how modernist luxury clients feel dissatisfied with the design of architects and how people working in modernist architecture impose restrictions on their "living machines" I often speak about what. For Grop

Since the establishment of the North American university, our research field is one of the core art and science, but we encourage modern interdisciplinary scholarships - crossing the boundaries of traditional knowledge and encouraging new innovative perspectives Scholarship to do - also pioneers. It is the world. Students all over the world recognize that history is ready for any academic or professional effort they can hardly imagine. Historical students are fascinated by this field for various reasons. There are also personal people. My grandfather's story about the Great Depression, the memory of my mother's work at the factory, or my friend's experience of religious persecution and exile, makes history a sense of our lives, identity and status It causes a lifelong appeal about how to shape. For others, historical research is to learn to be a good citizen, to understand the rights and obligations of citizenship, and to develop our ethical and national standards for public life It is part of the tool. We are attracted to history, we learn to find and evaluate empirical evidence and compare the practical skills necessary to put the opposite interpretation and theory into practice. Finally, many of us highly appreciate the pleasure of writing and reading that excellent book. Because its literary value is as large as its complex historical scholarship. Please do your own historical research using the latest computer equipment of the university libraries When exercising sound skepticism, respecting the fact as an integral part of every discussion, mentioning the necessity to record facts, interdisciplinary discussion, and the willingness to challenge the "truth" with new evidence established "Human experience diversity", that is, to highlight the similarities and differences of human society over time The skills you have acquired in the profession of history has high market value. History major has outstanding achievements in law, education, library science, museum research, and government, but succeeded with various careers from barista to CEO. Here are some recent specialized roads The Student Services Library 411 Suite has a wealth of resources to help students complete a career. These resources include Career and Employer Library, Career Planning Seminar, Fall and Spring 'Career Day', and Personal Career Counseling. For more information, please call 621-2588 or visit www.career.arizona.edu's website. Why do you learn history? Anyone considering registering for a history course should consider this problem. It is reasonable to expect people with a history of research to be interested in the past - but this is not the only reason. You should also understand the importance and value of history. In today's world, the focus is today and tomorrow, the value of history is often questioned. Some people are skeptical about the actual value of history. Some people question the relevance and usefulness of what happened long ago. Some people think history has little effect on their lives and the world today. Some people doubt the practical value of professional market historical qualifications. All of these problems deserve some reflection, especially for ambitious historical students. This page contains some simple ideas on the value and importance of research history. Historical research also has many practical advantages. I agree with one of the few that the prominent historian Arthur Schlesinger gives, why should you study history? "First of all, this is very interesting." This is especially true when you visit "where history took place". There is a stimulus to the battlefield that people sacrifice everything to protect their homeland or for noble purpose. It is fun to appreciate material culture in past museums, and when we see artifacts in their lives, we connect with our ancestors. We have continuity in the past, especially when considering our position in the country of God that exists from the first hist

I had a wonderful night at the 44th Street Etcetera Salon last night. One of the hosts, Mark Janas and Tanya Moberly were played and played by his students at the Manhattan Conservatory. They are wonderful. They have a wonderful song selection from call porter to the Beatles. They did a lot of songs from Closer Than Ever, this is closeup. My dear show, like Kirk did in New York a year ago, I saw it many times. I think Mark is also a big fan of Richard Maltby. I tried a new song, and the night when I tried new materials was always a bit uncomfortable for me. All my things are comedy, my success or failure depends on the level of laughter and laughter of the audience. "Murder" he said that he did another Betty Hutton song last night. I got up and started talking about the problem of dating an old man, but I am already a date old. Okay, I did not go deep here when I had the feeling of taking the audience to the driveway. They like joke of Abercrombie and Fitch (I have to see me one day to hear this joke). The best part of the salon is mixed interception or after the show. It's time to see singers and get your name and Facebook contact information. Many talented people came here, Christine Pedy showed up last night and we got Sara Rice from the original Sweeney Todd a few weeks ago. As a relative newbie to the cabaret performance world, I am always honored to receive their feedback and positive comments. I wanted to do it on Thursday with double-sided performances, so I wanted to say "let's kill" the number he said at the salon last night. It's so smooth that it may be the second song I made. I have something I tend to do, and I decided to decide. We will publish it to you soon. Today is a busy day - what else is new? I 're rehearsing for the first time, I am working on a network series called "Water Cooler Crazy", and after rehearsing this independent movie, I am called Demo Guy. These two projects have been developed for a while for several months, and they seem to happen at the same time. Does it always work this way? Anyway, I remember Monday. I will be back tomorrow to see what happened to you! Hello! January 2016 - January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016; Second year: 2017 - January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017 Grade 3: 2018 - It is scheduled to run from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018, scheduled to be implemented after Grade 4: 2019 - January 1, 2019. The Course Communication Plan Implementation Guide and Checklist outlines the problem, objectives and strategies and shows the schedule for implementing the recommendations (Year 1 to Year 4). Activities identified in the first year are being conducted in many courts or are sufficiently important to start planning and implementation first. Due to the nature of the activity, some strategies overlap for many years. The chief judge of each local jurisdiction has the right to prioritize execution as necessary and have the opportunity to announce the results at the Supreme Court ministerial meeting or in the case designated by the Supreme Court minister. The year after you: The Jupiter of Scorpio (your dominant planet), you will spend most of 2018 and plan an important moment later this year. The lunar eclipse on January 31 laid the foundation for the great achievement made in August, and the Aquarius solar eclipse on February 15 will keep in touch with the right people and support you along the way. Even if Mars retrogrades this summer, absolute eclipses of cancer on July 12 will give you a sweet investment, and Venus retrograde will give you some small uplift on the road this fall I will do. On the morning of January 31, 2018, a total solar eclipse can be seen in the western part of the USA and in the morning. It is also a "super moon" and in consideration of the origin of its astrology it is a word that attracts some skepticism, which is equivalent to 30% of the pixel of the moon in the camera sensor. Such opportunities are rare for travel photographers who may never

At the age of six, John Wesley was rescued from the burning room of his father's parish, depicting sculptures of the 19th century. Because of this impressive event, he came to call himself "a brand that was burned out and removed." Not all the US Ministers were attacked by the era of reason. In the 1730's, religious resurrection passed through British colonies in the UK. Yale Minister Jonathan Edwards refused to convert to the English church and he began to worry about the New England increasingly concerned about secular issues. In his view, people feel that pursuing wealth is more important than John Calvin's religious principle. Some people are beginning to suggest that fate is wrong and good work may save the soul. Edwards cried from the podium to oppose these ideas. "God is an angry judge and man is a sinner!" He declared. He is full of anger and firm statements that people are flocking. This caused a big awakening well known in American colonies. George Whitefield is the British Minister who visited the American colony. As a trained actor, he will shout God's Word, cry in sorrow, and tremble with passion when he preaches. Thousands of settlers flocked to hear his story. He changed slaves and even several Native Americans. Even religious skeptical Benjamin Franklin emptied his coin purse after hearing the speech in Philadelphia. Soon the United States split. In waking and in Hong Kong, missionaries built their schools and churches across the colony. Princeton University is such a school. The old light preachers refused to accept this new way of worship. Despite the conflict, one amazing result is greater religious tolerance. As there are so many new sects, it is clear that none of the religions occupy any area. The great awake is a reaction to enlightenment, but it is also a long-term cause of the revolution. Prior to this, the cabinet members represented the upper class. The awakening minister is not always appointed, it breaks respect for better people. The new beliefs that emerged are more democratic in their way. Common messages are more equal. A big awakening is also a kind of "nation". This is the first major event all colonies can share and will help break down the differences between them. There is no conspiracy in the UK to accentuate the differences between the Americans and their cousins ​​on the sea. In fact, this religious turmoil caused a serious political influence. Definition of big awakening. A big awakening is an era of religious awakening and reform. This is a series of religious resurrections that hit American colonies led by Evangelical Protestant pastors. The great awakening was triggered by a tour of the English Evangelical pastor named George Whitefield. The first big awakening began in 1725 and continued until 1750. The second awakening began in the early 1800s. The third and fourth Renaissance inspired by the great awakening took place from 1880 to 1910 and from the late 1960s to the early 1970s. In this article I will explain the first waking up and the second waking up in American colonial era. Historians said that the first awakening in the 1730s and the 1740s and the second awakening in the third wake up from the late 1950s to early 20th century. These renaissance was a part of the big romantic religious movement that hit the United Kingdom, Scotland, and Germany, mainly in Europe, mainly. Just like the first big awakening half a century ago, the second reflection of romanticism is characterized by passion, emotion and charm to supernaturalism. It rejected skepticism, faith, and rationalism left behind from enlightenment. Almost at the same time, similar movements also flourished in Europe. Pietism swept the German countries. Evangelism in the UK is very strong In the 1890s, New England began resurrecting "second great awakening". The general feeling is lower than big awakening, the second awakening leads to the establishment of universities and seminary, and to the organi

The subject of the "consequence of sin" story is described as the reality of sin, the occurrence of evil, secret sin and hypocrisy, hypocrisy of Puritan, the result of doubt and doubt, devastating effect, moral skepticism, or all It is the impact of the morale of the discovery of sinners and hypocrites "(McKeithan 93). Both the "minister's black veil" and "young Goodman Brown" dealt with commitment to sin, but Nathaniel Hawthorne revealed different results. Hester, Pearl, Dimsdale, Chillingworth all felt the effects of sin. This book shows that sin has many different consequences. It may be shame, hatred, or even death, but sin has various effects. This may be disappointing, I dislike this book to teach important lessons about sin. It teaches that the outcome of sin is all bad and that good things do not come from sin. Hester, Ding Mesdale, Chillingworth have had a negative effect on Hawthorne's psychological novel "The Scarlet Letter". Everyone sins and all the sins bring about the result, but when the sin is revealed the result may be less. In the "red letter", Dimsdale concealed his sin, he suffered more than Hester, and Hester revealed her sin. People who confess their sins find peace and those who conceal their sins will suffer. To prove his argument, Hawthorne is "true! True! Truthful! Show freedom to the world, if you are not your worst, you may infer some of the worst features! " The influence and meaning of sin at essay.com/"red ": This is an article about how sin affects different character in Nasser Hawthorn's" Red Letter ". The influence and meaning of sin in "Red Letter": This is an article about how sin affects different characters in Nasser Hawthorne's "Red Letter". After reading Nasaniel's Hawthorne's "Red Letter", you can see that the result of sin is the subject of this book. Hawthorne explored this topic through four different levels of sin. All levels are equally represented throughout the novel, but the human inhuman crime against humanity is more than anyone else. The hero is one or more crimes of revenge, hypocrisy, and adultery. First of all, at the beginning of the novel, we know that Hester Prine has committed adultery. We were also told that one of her punishments for this crime was to fulfill her sentence. Second, she has a baby formed by desire, not love. The name Pearl gave this child a great fortune. Third, there are red letters on Hester 's chest. This is done to inform all citizens that she is a black in the forest. Hester Prynne is the main example of how this theme affects story characters. She personally experienced the effects of sin, harassed by the public, and often laughed at her actions. The red word on her chest is a symbol of shame and publicly humiliates her every day. She was at the forefront of the attack and warmed her sins, which in turn hurt her health and well-being. As the story continues, she becomes increasingly weak as her results and her guilt feelings begin to disappear in her body and emotions. Her guilt is not only because of her 'red letter' and her attack but also because she keeps the secrets of two people, Arthur Dimsdale and Roger Chillingworth. She had to hide the illegal acts of Arthur Dimmesdale, and she had to hide the real identity of Roger Chillingworth who undoubtedly gave her a great emotional pressure.

The movie makes a short term commitment to introduce a fair premise. Some teenagers incorrectly killed their children and attempted to hide their dark secrets. These people live in Point Pleasant, West Virginia, and you know who is home. Will Monsters punish? The wheel falls quickly. We will fast forward for several years. A reporter in a big city where one of them visited the town was instantly invited to drink for the children she helped in the murder (reunion of all the murderers). what? Who are you going to kill? There is no comment about such absurd plot device. Let's say the movie did not do this. Please enter stock village stupid. This is the best character and works very well (climbing and everything). It is really cool to hear the motive of this creature, strange red eyes, sticking to the mirror, and his crazy rumor explaining his own back. The most important thing is his custom of frequent shooting, especially because this man is blind. Pop Quiz: When you leave the city and learn to die, she: A) Leave the town, B) Stay and fight? I guess that. Please use a gun. Always confront legendary monsters. But the last 20 minutes passed beyond foolishness. It seemed as if the original run time was too short, so I quickly inserted a clumsy "distortion" to explain the very stupid new conclusion they joined. A new director was found at the local infant playground and additional shots were taken. "We thought you were dead!" "Yes, I am as well." Who wrote this, did they promise? Mothman already has some skepticism about whether it exists. This movie is not very useful to him. Well, I understand the tendency to mark this form as "Mothman", but it needs to say that it is very similar to the original "Mothman" of Point Pleasant in West Virginia. Moths are a strange place to panic, all of which are almost supernatural - it is seen as a precursor to death, like the Irish bungee. It goes without saying that it is the subject of the movie. It is a very good thing for Richard Gere. The moth in Chicago is a little liar that jumped from the building and jumped over the streetlight pillar. Today, Mosman is the focus of the annual festival of Point Pleasant, and the local art museum is also dedicated to "winged strangeness". As movies and other popular culture pay attention to Mosman and his sight is growing, there are things that are less reliable than others ... but the event at Point Pleasant is as convincing as Mosman's followers There is and it is mysterious Today, Mothman is a symbol of pop culture for Point Pleasant, with 12 feet of metal statue and Mothman Festival being held every September. At the Museman museum you can reserve newspaper clippings and other exhibitions and reserve a bus tour of the TNT area of ​​World War II during the Second World War outside of the city where Mosman first appeared . In 1952, the three boys of Flatwoods passed through the night sky and discovered the shining objects that remained in the farmland of their neighbors. They ran to the UFO landing site where they encountered a fiery fireball and dazzling fog. Then they saw the eye lit creature at least 7 feet tall. It snored violent snakes and the witnesses ran away with fear Folklore Jan Harold Brunvand points out that Mothman is widely covered in the mass media, some claim to be related to UFOs, others claim that the military storage location is Mothman's "home" did. Brunvand noted that the story of Mosman's report in 1966-67 indicates that at least 100 people saw that Mosman had more "fear of reporting tourist attractions". I could not refer to an identifiable person. Brunvand suggests that real things cause panic and mix with existing folklore, as there are elements common to many Mosman reports and many of the ancient folklore. He also recorded anecdotes that Mr. Mossman attacked the roof of a car parked by a young man.

One night, when I saw the sky at midnight, I saw several meteors. But then I saw something I did not know. It has light like an airplane, but it moves too fast and in fact is not an airplane. I think it is strange to see similar things, but I do not think too much. After the star gaze period, I came very tired and returned to my house to get to sleep. When I was wearing silk pajamas, I thought there was a strange light in the sky. UFO came to my mind but I do not think there is a way to do it. UFO: This term is often used for all reported scenes of unidentified objects in the sky, most of which have been proven to be natural phenomena (eg Venus) or artificial aircraft (eg balloon). More specifically, the term UFO refers to a "flying saucer" or other alien spaceship which is said to be visually visual. The belief in UFOs may be between innocuous speculation that alien creatures visited the earth. These creatures are often seen as insignificant (spiritual) entities that communicate with contacts through telepathy (spiritual). Their message actually violates the Bible's faith. One of the complaints often raised by UFO as skepticism of objective physical phenomena is the way to study the nature of UFO data and UFO. These complaints are based on specific scientific views and their data and do not necessarily apply to phenomena like UFOs. This does not mean that UFO is not suitable for scientific research. That simply means that the way you work in one area of ​​science does not fit in another. [R UFOs, also called UFOs, are floating objects and optical phenomena that are not readily recognized by observers. Along with the development of the rocket after the Second World War, UFO became a major concern and it was thought by some researchers that it is a clever alien life of the earth. The first famous UFO was flying his mini airplane in 1947 when Merchant Kenneth Arnold insisted that he was watching nine high speed objects near Mount Rainier in Washington. Arnold estimates that a crescent shaped object is thousands of miles per hour and "fly water like a bucket." In the newspaper coverage after that, this object was said to be a dish by mistake One of the most widely prevalent legends of the modern era includes UFO, UFO or UFO. Since the pilot's Kenneth Arnold saw a strange thing flying over the state of Washington in 1947, rumors and reports about the spaceships moved by alien creatures emerged in the media. By the end of the 1990's the UFO myth had evolved into a series of elaborate stories about various aliens. Some of them were kidnapped by humans. The story of UFO stands out with similarities with early myths such as fairy abductions and ghosts and demonic mysteries. Ironically, the lack of reliable evidence supporting the UFO's claim is added to the myth, as there is no evidence of government conspiracy or concealment. Conspiracy - the secret power that forms events and hides the public truth - is probably manifested in many contemporary myths, reflecting the lack of confidence in leaders and officials

Islamic Studies is an international peer-reviewed research journal published by the Islamabad Islamic Institute in Pakistan since 1962. It publishes research papers, memos, reviews, review articles and book reviews for all Islamic studies including the Quran. , Hadith, Tough Seil, Schiller, 'Ilm al-Kalam, law, Fik, law, religion, philosophy, psychology, anthropology, sociology, culture, civilization, economics, language, literature, history, science and technology. Its contributors include some of the best scholars from all over the world. Articles and book reviews published in Islamic studies are abstracted or indexed. : Religious Science, Index · Islamic, Public Information Service (PAIS), International Documentation Report (IBR), Islamic World Book Review, Middle East Journal, ATLA Religious Database, Religious Number One (RIO) and Religious Book Review (IBRR) Islamic studies are archived in the database of JSTOR, EBSCOhost, ProQuest. It is one of the research publication journals approved by the Pakistan Higher Education Committee. "Mobile Wall" represents the period between the latest issue available in JSTOR and the latest journal. The moving wall is usually expressed in terms of age. In rare cases, since the issuer selected the "zero" mobile wall, the current problem will be made public on JSTOR as soon as it is issued. For example, if the current year is 2008 and the journal has a 5 year moving frame, you can get the 2002 article. Finally, Descartes' universal methodological allegation logically led to universal skepticism. In a system where the foundation of human reason is completely destroyed, certainty can not be obtained. When refusing to accept all suspicious things suspected as "completely wrong", he saw the limbs he was sitting in. But, in addition to these things, how does the mind try to verify its reliability? If Descartes does not rely on the simple judgment of "2 + 3 = 5" and "There are four aspects in the square" his teachers are more complicated to prove the existence of God and the infinite integrity What do you think can be presented? Montagnes, Descartes Montagnes and Descartes have used philosophical approaches focused on using doubts to discover themselves and the surrounding world. But they doubt different things. Descartes doubts all his previous knowledge from his senses, and Montagne doubts the absolute certainty of knowledge. I doubt that all of them are starting their philosophical process, but Montagne doubts the constant and static self, Descartes suspects that everything is present, and Descartes has no doubtful certainty I can overcome this doubt to find out "Do we often wonder what is true or true? Descartes ... Read more Who can say that Descartes' doubt is not completely or partially influenced by Al Ghazzari's doubt? Even if you withdraw from the influence problem, the two philosophers will still find similar terms that are similar. In other places we discussed, Descartes' Cogito 'was not completely inspired by St. Augustine, it showed that there are many similarities with the idea of ​​Ibn Sina' s' Human Hibernation ' It was. It existed in ancient times and became new in the Middle Ages. So what can you do today to stop an existing connection? You can not restrict views or opinions to limited geographical boundaries or limit their movement. The secret that was once called an atom is the common scientific knowledge of the world today.

When trying to explain the nature of science, it is useful to think of science as a culture, just as thinking about the cultural world of art and music. When we enter these worlds, we need to understand and talk about art and music. Again, we need to be able to understand and talk about science Derek Hodson, a science educator and researcher, compared science teaching and how anthropologists teach different cultures. Both can be regarded as involving people with specific knowledge, specific language, customs, customs, traditions, attitudes, values. When we explain the nature of science, we are considering the special characteristics, values ​​and assumptions on which scientific knowledge is based, and how scientific knowledge develops. Science education defines the principle (trait) of the essence of science understood by students and important to all citizens. William McComas and Joanne Olson analyzed the papers of the latest science education courses around the world and identified 14 statements on the nature of science common to most courses. Scientific knowledge relies heavily on observation, experimental evidence, rational discussion and skepticism, but it is not completely dependent Law and theory play different roles in science. Therefore, be aware that even if there is additional evidence the theory does not become a law. This is probably the most widely recognized list of scientifically fundamental principles. These principles are considered suitable for elementary and junior high school because they do not need to provide a more accurate view of scientific career and to effectively understand scientific expertise. Each principle is explained in principle of the essence of science These principles can be used to make each subset of the scientific nature of the New Zealand curriculum document easier to understand and to teach. They are particularly useful for opening up an alternative to "knowing science". Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L. & Ledermann, N. (1998). The essence of science and educational practice: to make nature unnatural. Science education, 82 (4), 417-436 Hodson, D. (2009). Education and learning about science: language, theory, method, history, tradition, and values. Sense Publisher: Rotterdam McComas, W. F. & Olson, J. K. (1998). Scientific nature of the International Science Education Standards McComas (Ed.), Scientific Essence of Science Education: Reason and Strategy (pp. 41-52). Kluwer Academic Press: Netherlands Correction: These functions are usually listed in the list (for example, in scientific checklists or in the scientific nature of Lederman and Lederman 7), in order to make it easier to memorize important aspects of scientific nature and processes, See one side). Understanding the nature and process of science is not just about selecting items in the list. Teachers should not expect students to remember the list of topics on science nature and processes so that teachers do not want students to remember the list of cell structures to represent cellular knowledge. These lists remind you of a more complex series of concepts, including many meanings, nuances, and interrelationships. Science education defines the principle (trait) of the essence of science understood by students and important to all citizens. William McComas and Joanne Olson analyzed the world's most advanced science education curriculum documents and identified 14 statements on the nature of science common to most courses. This is probably the most widely recognized principle of scientific essence. These principles are considered suitable for elementary and junior high school because they do not need to provide a more accurate view of scientific career and to effectively understand scientific expertise. Each principle is explained in principle of the essence of science In a completely technical world, we naturally base knowledge on science. Science is mathematics and depends heavily on stat

Use this page to find some basic information on big awakening. The Great Awakening was a spiritual renaissance that swept the American colonies, especially New England, in the first half of the 18th century. There were Christians who adopted a loving way of passion and prayer widely among believers who began to escape from the ways of worship that was established at the time. This new spiritual renewal began in the UK with the Wesley brothers, George Whitefield and other people, and they went to American colonies in the first half of the 18th century. Unlike the spirituality of Puritans in the early 18th century, revivalism brought about by waking makes it possible for people to express their emotions more openly in order to have closer intimacy with God . In England in the late 17th century, the glorious revolution in 1688 prevented the fight between religious groups and political groups and the English church became the dominant church of the country. Other religions such as Catholicism, Judaism, Puritanism were subsequently suppressed From a political standpoint, this brought about stability, because now everyone is practicing the same religion. But it is not a positive driving force for religious beliefs, but confidence and belief in spiritual "dryness" among believers. Religion has become an entertainment "passing movement" without deep heart and belief during service. The "resurrection" of the awakening spirit appeared after decades of self-satisfaction in British and American colonies. The greatest significance of waking up is that it is how to prepare the United States for the Revolutionary War. During the decades before the war, revivalism taught people to be bold in the face of religious authority, when the church could not meet the expectations of believers, people should go away and form a new church I made it. Through awakening, settlers noticed that religious power is in their own hands, not by the hands of the English church or any other religious authority. After one or two generations of this way of thinking, the settlers gradually noticed that political power was in the hands of the British monarch, but gradually became aware of the will of autonomy (given the wording of the declaration of independence). By 1775, not all settlers had the same theological belief, but they had a common vision, ie they were not dominated by Britain. Therefore, the Great Awakening brings the climate to enable the American Revolution. The first big awakening began in 1725 and continued until 1750. The second awakening began in the early 1800s. The third and fourth Renaissance inspired by the great awakening took place from 1880 to 1910 and from the late 1960s to the early 1970s. In this article I will explain the first waking up and the second waking up in American colonial era. The first big awakening was the spiritual renaissance which swept the American colonies, especially New England, in the first half of the 18th century. Adjacent map shows the way to revival and resurrection of the second awakening. The northern part of New York is known as "burned area" due to many reconstruction activities that hit this area during the second awakening. Historians said that the first awakening in the 1730s and the 1740s and the second awakening in the third wake up from the late 1950s to early 20th century. These renaissance was a part of the big romantic religious movement that hit the United Kingdom, Scotland, and Germany, mainly in Europe, mainly. Just like the first big awakening half a century ago, the second reflection of romanticism is characterized by passion, emotion and charm to supernaturalism. It rejected skepticism, faith, and rationalism left behind from enlightenment. Almost at the same time, similar movements also flourished in Europe. Pietism swept the German countries. Evangelism in the UK is very strong

Many educational methods have been tried in order to improve the attitude and performance of students in science and mathematics education. The achievements are integrated, but the systematic review of the attitude effect is missing. This research provides a meta-analysis review based on 56 publications (1988-2014) and reports 65 independent experiments that examined the influence of teaching methods on student's attitude in elementary or secondary science or mathematics education I will. The five teaching methods are distinguished: based on inquiries, context-based, computer-based, collaborative learning strategies and extracurricular activities. By differentiating the results of various attitudes and assessing attitudes at different levels of granularity, we conducted separate analyzes of certain more global outcomes. There are no major differences in the results of different educational methods. In summary of all the interventions, the general attitudes (n = 60; d = 0.35), general interest (n = 20; d = 0.22), and scientific career interest (n = 4; d = 0.40) Has become significant. Impact For the older students, the results of the research are markedly bad. Analysis of the achievement resulted in a significant significant overall effect (n = 40; d = 0.78), with no significant difference between the teaching methods. Positive influences may be due in part to novelty, but the current findings are contradicting skepticism about learning outcomes of interest-oriented teaching methods. NPE The aim of this research is to focus on the study of the influence of CAI on the mathematical performance of LD students and to provide a meta-study of mathematical computer-aided education (CAI) studies for students with learning disabilities (LD) Was to do. In this study, a total of 11 mathematical CAI studies were examined, these studies met the research selection criteria, applied to LD students at elementary and junior high school, and analyzed based on their comparability and impact sizes. Overall, this survey found that these CAI surveys did not show clear validity with relatively large effect size. Chinese methodology Many educational methods have been tried in order to improve the attitude and performance of students in science and mathematics education. The achievements are integrated, but the systematic review of the attitude effect is missing. This research provides a meta-analysis review based on 56 publications (1988-2014) and reports 65 independent experiments that examined the influence of teaching methods on student's attitude in elementary or secondary science or mathematics education I will. The five teaching methods are distinguished: based on inquiries, context-based, computer-based, collaborative learning strategies and extracurricular activities. By differentiating the results of various attitudes and assessing attitudes at different levels of granularity, we conducted separate analyzes of certain more global outcomes. There are no major differences in the results of different educational methods. For older students, research results are pretty bad The influence of innovative science and math education on the attitude and achievement of students The results of the report of the junior high school student's computer simulation experiment 40 in the science education were integrated through the meta analysis process to investigate the influence of computer simulation experiments and interactive optical disk simulation on student achievement and attitude. The results of the survey show that students using computer simulation and interactive optics simulator have a significant positive difference between low and high level scores compared to students using more traditional learning activities It turned out that there was. In the retention rate, no significant difference was found in the attitude of the student on the topic and the way of education. Based on the results of this study, computer simulation experiments

Digital technology is changing our lives. Every time Fitbit is literally updated or announced by Apple technology seems to make things faster and more convenient. Does this make us the slave of technology? Because we walked around like "walking and dying" and checking new Instagram posts on our iPhone. Observations recorded by Compare the Market seem to imply this. From their colleagues, who are sending you an e-mail, and from friends who want to review each restaurant they want to go to, their infographic may have a health impact on the warning signs and techniques. Humorous insight into addiction I saw a list of these infographs comparing the markets. Oh, we all hate those who shake it so that someone can put his smartphone in action and not see it clearly. But, apart from humor, does technology break down our human race and harm our health? Are we becoming undead? Some people think that technology is harmful to our health, others think that makes us the oldest healthy person. Behind technical skepticism there is sufficient decisive evidence to support the assertion that our equipment has a bad influence on our health - research by the University of Gothenburg, the use of mobile phones for men and women It increases sleep and depression. This study also showed that daily midnight computer use is associated with gender related two sleep disorders, stress and depression. On the other hand, so many applications designed to make our lives happier and healthier have never been on the market. There are apps for tracking your sleep cycle, your fitness, cycling, your walks, motivating you to maintain a healthy app, calorie counter ... the list is endless! There are new technologies such as pedometer, heart rate monitor, weight scale for Wi-Fi, running watch etc. All these technological advances helped to realize our health in the "always connected" era. In addition, advances in technology such as 3D printing will help save lives, improve the health of millions of people around the world, and help highlight the benefits of culture affiliated with technology. What do you think? Is technology harmful or informative to our health? Should we prepare for a zombie catastrophe? Please display infographics and leave comments below 2016 occurred in a catastrophic event of zombies. Zombie's caves are scattered throughout the map, and these caves create zombies that are hard to kill. Units killed by zombies will be zombies of their own power. Surprisingly, in the finals the team Future Perfect sacrificed all consular consular, created a huge zombie tribe, destroyed the turtle (defensive and immovable) team. The soldier was a great success. Finally, 2017. Along with changes in economic dynamics, the core distortion is a continuous adjustment system like the projectile weapon. This changed the microscopic appearance of the fight as quality figures are no longer the most effective weapon. Actually, please ignore my team, the test robot. Never try to build another remote unit with the exception of the scout. However, we rely on an unusual strategy of building only a proximity fighter called Lumberjack. In charge of logging of middle standing trees forming most topography "Human" players are increasingly fighting "zombies", but if a person "turns around" (that is, it is marked), that player becomes a zombie. At the beginning of the game, there was only one or two zombies; zombies increased by marking humans and converted them to zombies in one hour. By using socks, marshmallows, Nerf Blasters, or other toys considered safe and appropriate, humans can protect themselves from zombie attacks. I will exchange with the game for 15 seconds. The goal of zombies is to change all humans, and at the same time humans must overcome all zombies

Israel - The Palestinian conflict has existed for many years and can be traced back to the British rule in this area. One of the most notable problems is resource problems such as oil and water in the state. Another source of the conflict was Israel's support from Western countries such as the United States during the conflict in the Gaza Strip, which created an imbalance of power between Israel and Palestine. The concept of power is a very important aspect of this conflict. Because it is a matter of economic, political power and social power, it may be the reason for US participation as it makes sense for them. Crave the urge Important Question: What happened to the Israel-Palestinian peace process after the collapse of Camp David? Why is this happening? Since 2001, what has changed in the international relations between Israel and the Palestinian conflict? Why do many scholars have more doubts about the prospects of peace in Israel - Palestine? What is the potential international meaning of such skepticism? Main question: Since the conclusion of the Bush administration (2001 to 2009), how has the US policy toward the Middle East developed? How do scholars think that should change it? What are the major problems facing the United States in the future relationship with this region? What kind of opportunities and lessons should the United States learn from the relationship with the region? What is the impact of the EU's attempt to influence the Middle East's policy on how much Europe is catching up with the United States, the Middle East and North Africa? Does Haas's research reveal the role of ideology in international relations? POLI 365-001 John Creed Autumn 2013, MWF 9: 00-9: 50 am.m. 26 Coming St. (201) Office Hour, MW 11: 30 am - 12: 30 pm 953 - 8137 (Office) TR 2: 00 - 3: 30, reservation system 953 - 5724 (message) E - mail: creedj@cofc.edu Israel - Various data on casualties of Palestinian conflict have been obtained from various studies. According to Stockholm International Peace Institute between 1948 and 1997, 13,000 Israelis and Palestinians were killed in conflict. In other estimates, 14,500 people died between 1948 and 2009. The deaths of the Palestinians during the 1982 Lebanon war were the outcome of 2,000 PLO combatants killed in armed conflict with Israel, all of which resulted in deaths and injuries between Israelis and Palestinians, including IDF military operations He pointed at him. These figures such as artillery, search and arrest campaigns, barrier demos, targeted killings, colonial violence, etc. These figures include indirect conflict-related events like casualties or unknown situations or controversial circumstances Is not included. These figures include all casualties of all ages and sexes. This is not an easy task. Talking about the peacebuilders, especially when the conflict between Israel and Palestine is concerned. Even after more than 60 years, this complex confrontation continues, and many Israelis and Palestinians are further away and disappointed with the peace process. We participated in six journeys and witnessed everyday efforts to promote tolerance and peace. Listen to their stories, follow their daily lives, and watch their everyday struggle just let us extinguish us from the snapshots of their lives at the end of the day. But more importantly, it has influenced us

Warming in the middle of the winter is warming, and in some places, warming is dramatic. The northern plains, the Great Lakes, and the northeastern part are the warmest at the earliest, but warming in the western part of the United States is slower. In some areas of Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Northern New England, the average temperature in the decade from 1970 exceeded 1 ° F and the total temperature exceeded 4 ° F. The five places where the average temperature in winter is rising are as follows. Winter is the most temperate climate in most parts of the country, from the former mountain of the Rocky Mountains to the east coast. The greatest warming in the northern states highlights the general rule of climate change - cold regions and seasons are warmer and warmer than warmer regions and seasons. However, there are some exceptions. In autumn, the Pacific coast North west becomes the fastest and the spring warms at the fastest speed in the southwest. Summer is the fastest season for global warming in Texas For those who prefer low temperatures, warm winter seems to be good, but calm winter can create more challenging times for industries that are economically dependent on cold winter. Travel and recreation may be affected if gentle conditions adversely affect skiing, snowmobiling and ice fishing. In the west, when winter becomes warmer, melting snow becomes faster and snow decreases. Because this depends on drinking water in the second half of this year and snow melting in agriculture, there is a possibility to put pressure on the water level of the reservoir. In addition, it leads to more dry vegetation and soil, increasing the risk of forest fires. In the warm winter you can remind people that the hotest spells will be more frequent as summer returns. METHOD: Calculate the winter temperature of each city using the data from the climate information system (ACIS) using the average temperature in December, January, February. Data is the earliest reliable data of all cities analyzed nationwide, beginning in 1970. All NCEI climate divisions summarize national trends Fact: It is getting warm in winter. The results of the measurements show that the global climate has generally warmed over the past century, regardless of the season and in most areas. These skeptics misunderstood the public during the winter of 2003 - record cold in the northeastern United States in 2004. Since its recording in 1896, that winter was the 33rd cold place in the area. In addition, a single cold weather in a narrow area does not indicate air-conditioning of a global climate, meaning the long-term average of the entire planet. Fact: It is getting warm in winter. As a result of independently analyzing the measurement results of various scientists, the global climate has generally warmed in most areas regardless of the season over the past 100 years. (These studies were compiled in the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change in 2001.) The winter skepticism of 2003-2004 is a record cold in the northeastern United States, I suggested denying the change in scale. Warm forecasts can be misleading. . It is lower than the average temperature in the northeast in that winter, but since its establishment in 1896 it has been ranked 33rd in the area (NCDC, 2004 Climate, 2004). In January 2004, the worst cold occurred in the season which is the coldest month in November in the northeastern part. The Northeastern region did not destroy the historical cold record of that winter (NCDC, 2004 climate, 2004) Winter is the most temperate climate in most parts of the country, from the former mountain of the Rocky Mountains to the east coast. The greatest warming in the northern states highlights the general rule of climate change - cold regions and seasons are warmer and warmer than warmer regions and seasons. However, there are some exceptions. In autumn, the Pacific coast North west becomes the fastest and the spring warms

Renaissance was a great era of knowledge growth and regeneration - in fact, the literal meaning of the word Renaissance is "regeneration" in French. For the Europeans this new age of enlightenment began in Florence, and it was not until the end of the 14th century that black death destroyed almost half of the European population after the Middle Ages. During the Renaissance philosophy, science, mathematics revolution dramatically changed the art and culture of Europe. In the Middle Ages, people should devote their lives to the church more than anything else. In contrast, the Renaissance humanist removed the medieval tradition, focused on personal interest rather than religious demands, emphasized the importance of secular joy, and studied Plato and Asia. The classic text of philosophers like Christopher is inspiration. With the advent of humanism, people are increasingly interested in travel and knowledge pursuit. Renaissance writers, artists, scientists and other thinkers have received great influence from humanitarian beliefs - Francesco Petrak, Giovanni Bocasio, Sir Thomas Moore, Francis Bacon, Renaissance art and literature A few pioneers of affected humanism Around 1450, German citizen Johannes Gutenberg invented a printing press, followed by an information society spread. Before the Renaissance text was awkward handwriting and education was reserved for rich people who can enjoy this luxury. The media completely changed communications - suddenly the middle class was able to educate itself. Scientists can easily share work and achieve faster, more accurate discovery. Thanks to the media, new ideas have spread rapidly throughout Europe, enabling extensive educational reform. Renaissance was known through pop culture as a contribution to art. Artists such as Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci, Titian, etc. no longer need to pay attention to traditional depictions of religious figures and portraits, but they explain human body research in detail. Renaissance painters were influenced by humanists, inspired by ancient Greece and Rome. Thanks to the new and improved anatomical structure, the Renaissance painter studied to create perfect proportions, detail and emotion. Nude is getting more and more popular, and in order to raise its realistic perspective, Renaissance painters have done a lot of experiments on texture and depth. In the Renaissance, the new era of discovery spread throughout Europe, so the gap between science and religion was expanding. Scientists began to focus on real observations rather than religious teachings and examined their research with new skepticism. Sir Francis Bacon and his contemporaries supported the scientific method and called for the use of firm evidence to validate the theory. Meanwhile, anatomy became common and scientists began to better understand the fundamentals of human anatomy. Based on his observation of the telescope Galileo Galilei, sometimes called the "father of modern science" contrary to the beliefs of the Catholic Church against each central universe Kimberly Abruzzo has over 10 years of writer experience. She joined the poet and writer program at M.F.A. Amherst University Medieval success in the European Renaissance was when European society tried to relax the classic philosophy and values. Renaissance thinkers were characterized by the decline of culture in the Middle Ages and believed they tried to rebuild their past culture. Through interpretation, scholars will expand and improve classical value and philosophy, create their artistic style and cause scientific and philosophical quest to achieve this goal. The influence of the Renaissance is evident in religion, music, literature, politics, philosophy, science, art. Renaissance scholars employed humanism for research European society did not fully recover from the collapse of Rome until the Italian Renaissance made interest in classical text. As a result, European thinking is transferred from God to individu

Hello poetry is the poetry of the community to collect the money by advertising to like you readers. If you like poetry and meet other poets, join the community, delete ads and share your verses. It's completely free It is not just because I started to drink coffee, not just because I like you because energy jumps late at night. Always look at the coffee stained with a smile I threw the cup to the ground and I broke it a million. I abandoned the coffee pot and the stupid little brown beans. I accepted the fact that I dislike coffee. I am like a tea person. I will be busy dancing with the planet, remembering that harsh word of the night. Tell her how we missed her when she left the night without her, we wait for her to come back anxiously. How do you see them at the most difficult times, and do you remember that we are not alone? When everyone gets to sleep, I finally join them and I dream that they will never leave this world I entered. I can float on the galaxy and talk to asteroids, share the facts I thought, if you quit me, you can laugh and find everything saying better. Because I am loved by the planet and all stars, I will be one of the stars that I no longer want love. Because you have more love, I no longer fear anyone's love. Hello. Welcome to this "small" corner of medium. It is a small catalog of poetry, novels and satirical publications posted on the platform. Our story began with an article by Anna Now and is named "Smaller" Medium. It is recognized by all other works and seems to be more popular with the media. Posts containing works best suited to various publishers. This also includes our own comments based on the extent we explore these places. The end result should be the publication of all novels, poetry, and satirical publications to provide you the best and most insightful experience. Hello, everyone, I've just found this web site, and, I am surprised here at all. Poetry seems to be a good place. This is my hobby, but I am completely new. I do not know much about poetry terms. I saw a poem class. I am not sure about the agreement here, so if you are doing something wrong, please point it to me. Thank you BJ for being interested in poetry - Anna is a discussion leader on this site As far as I know there are some verses that I would like to share with our favorite ones. A group of people who participated in the Barnes and Noble online poetry classes - the newcomers of this group are beyond the people we played at every level of poetry. So, what you said about Andy, or "gold" was born in the novel (Hello, poetry!), Led a series of questions about love. Sarah Kay often talks about writing poetry as a question making process - doing something on the page, or finding answers or more questions within the process. When you ask David Orr of poetry critic, he may tell you that the poetry and music are in two different art forms, and as you begin to assign "poet" to the music poet, these The category of is too ambiguous. His reaction to the Bob Dylan Nobel Prize for Literature almost summarized his skepticism about the blurring of music and poetry boundaries.

The biography of Adam Smith Smith is one of 18th century Scottish moral philosophers who led to impulse modern theory and his work marked a groundbreaking and progressive method, this method gradually Replace fixed Aristotle's view on invisible hands: - § "Everyone, to make the community's annual income the same size as he is not generally intended to promote public interest We must make an effort, he just did not know to what extent it would be desirable to get to promote their own interests, and as well as many other situations, he is visible Not promoting his intention not purpose at hand. Nicholas Philipson's new biography, "Adam Smith: Enlightenment Life" (Ale; US $ 32.50) 2 · We have been very successful in trying to put Smith, let us look at this person, Pull it together How to be a little financial god feelings. Historian of the University of Edinburgh Phillipson, following Rothschild, revealed that Smith is more like a moral person than a marketer. He discovered a deeper emotional vein, but he used events and plots to activate his life, despite changing Smith to Lord mainly Byron. One is his close friendship with philosopher David Hume (his closest colleague and his greatest influence) and a less simple embrace of Hume's notorious atheism. It turned out that the real problem of Smith is not a matter of economists. How can we become more prosperous and poor people? Even if it is a question of a philosopher, what should I do? This is a modern question. Darwin's question: How do you find and unify the order of the world without God? Philosopher David Hume is an important early role in Scotland's Enlightenment Movement with Adam Smith in 1750. Hume has a major impact on the theoretical and Smith economies. Hume does not believe in causality - at least he can "see" the micro skepticism you cause - Smith also said that he is "an invisible economic mystery, invisible "I am looking forward to dinner instead of the butcher, winemaker, bakery's kindness, but I am interested in their interests," Mr. Smith said. writing. "We will not solve ourselves to their self-love, to their own human nature, our own necessities, but we will not tell them the benefits to them." It is very difficult, very Scotland, and Instead of the diameter of Calvinism. As we know today, it is not entirely a "free market economy". Myth is still unknown The 18th century economist Adam Smith's free market theory suggests that there is always a power supply to appease the demand, there is no invisible hand that can guarantee that no government does not exist . "We are not from the kindness to look forward to the butcher of the dinner, the baker's and the winemaker, but for their own benefit. Respectfully" Other promises of all other countries and countries and military alliances The best way to get rid of exotic countries to avoid open isolation policy. Historically, the feeling of the United States was strong. President Woodrow Wilson won the second paragraph in 1916 and is particularly prominent in international partnerships that will participate in the newly formed US, outside (outside) the United States (erroneously) outside World War I I promised. Prior to pilot Charles Lindberg at American First Committee, popular with outstanding performance, World War II, the committee attempted to stop US participation in the war

In Plato's 'criticism', Socrates and Christ talked deeply about the cause of Socrates escape. Socrates was accused of defiling the hearts of the young people in Athens. Christopher's student and close friend Christos tried to persuade him to escape because he did not believe that Socrates committed the actual crime. Socrates believes that if the government punishes him because he violated the commandments he may have violated the law. Socrates believes that the law is an image of a common father in society. Socrates is a Greek philosopher and its doctrinal mark is a transformation of philosophy - think of this person from the interaction with nature and the world. Socrates was sentenced to death by "corrupting young people" and was sentenced to death by "making rude god". His work is a turning point in ancient philosophy. His conceptual analysis method and identification of virtue and knowledge enabled philosophers to focus on the unconditional value of personality. Socrates received extensive education. He married a woman named Xanthippe. He is also actively involved in the public life of Athens. He also participated in the Peloponnesus War. Socrates is also a teacher and an old friend of Alcibiades who is a politician and military leader of Athens. In 399 BC he was criticized as "he is responsible for the fact that he respects the gods respected by the city, introduces the new god and that he will corrupt the youth." Socrates emerged in Plato dialogue was used as an example of philosophy. Socrates usually seems to be unaware of "playing with stupid" (called Socrates satire), and the people he spoke. In this way, Socrates leads people by asking them questions and they understand that they really do not know anything. This "guidance by question" is called a Socratic method. Again and again, the most intellectual, famous and successful celebrities in ancient Greece revealed ignorance when they agreed to engage in dialogue with Socrates. A friend of Socrates asked the name of the smartest person in the world by participating in the Delphi Oracle Committee, and Oracle replied "Socrates". When Socrates discovered that his name comes from Oracle's lips he began asking for life for other wisdom by trying to prove what she was doing wrong and asking them questions . Or try to "give" the underlying truth inside the person. So Soctrates' s journey was proposed. That's what he says, "I know one thing, I do not know anything." This is called the Socrates' paradox, skepticism, stoicism, cynicism, etc.

The big awakening is that religion spread across New England, becoming a member of more conversion and church. This spiritual awakening occurred between 1735 and 1745. The majority of short-term awakenings of 1735 - 45 years occurred in American colonies, especially New England. (McConvic, Section 9). There are many reasons for waking up, but the result will benefit a lot of people. Many people are increasingly far from religion, and the big awakening is the resurrection trying to change it. Definition of big awakening. A big awakening is an era of religious awakening and reform. This is a series of religious resurrections that struck the American colonies led by Evangelical Protestant pastors. The great awakening was caused by a trip to the UK gospel minister, George Whitefield. The first big awakening began in 1725 and continued until 1750. The second awakening began in the early 1800s. The third and fourth Renaissance inspired by the great awakening took place from 1880 to 1910 and from the late 1960s to the early 1970s. This article covers the first and second big awakenings that took place during the American colonial era. Historians said that the first awakening of the 1730s and the 1740s and the second awakening in the third awakening of the late 1950s and early 20th century. These renaissance was a part of the big romantic religious movement that struck mainly England, Scotland, and Germany, mainly in Europe. Just like the first big wake up half a century ago, the second reflection of romanticism is characterized by the passion for supernaturality, emotion and charm. It rejected skepticism, naturalism, and rationalism left from enlightenment. Almost at the same time, similar movements also flourished in Europe. Pietism swept the German countries. Evangelism in the UK is very strong The first big awakening was the spiritual renaissance that struck American colonies, especially New England in the first half of the 18th century. The adjacent map shows the way to the revival and resurrection of the second awakening. The northern part of New York is known as "burned area". Because there were many revival in the area during the second awakening. The Great Awakening was a revivalist movement caused by gradual weakening of the role of religion in the daily life of American settlers in the 1700s. Protestant churches and pastors care about the spiritual well-being of their congregation and begin a series of religious revival called mass awakening. The big awakening includes political factions that affect religious, social, and political change. A big awakening attempt to use the foundation of religion

The cases of Nietzsche and Wagner artists and their influences, Nietzsche and Wagner incident have been the focus of discussion among many excellent academic ideas of the last century. The controversy over this relationship led many to the possibility that the last break between the two could lead to Wagner's unfortunate death in 1882 and a writing accident in 1883 to 1888 Nietzsche. When investigating the details of this particular relationship, I was shocked by the depth of history and the philosophy of some discoveries. Crack of Wagner is important. When Nietzsche wrote the birth of this tragedy, Wagner represented a heroic artist and created a myth that unified German culture. Prior to 1886, Nietzsche regarded Wagner as a heavy duty Svendari seeking popularity by responding to the rise of German nationalism. In my opinion, this is a symbol of Nietzsche thinking about the transformation that I am about to pursue. The starting point of Nietzsche's earlier work was skepticism as his maid and nihilism. As Breazeale said: Philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is one of Wagner's nearest assistants, and proves Wagner's autobiography, Main Leven. This intimacy guided Nietzsche to argue that Wagner's father was a Gael in the 1888 book "Dell Wagner (Wagner Incident)" and "Ein · Gayer is in front of Cher Ein Adler") - Gaia is also a German word for Vulture. Adler is a very common Jewish last name. Wagner and Nietzsche have these guesses, but there is no evidence that gay is a Jew. Without evidence of DNA, we can not solve Wagner 's parent - child relationship problems. It is widely believed that Nietzsche once requested the praise of Wagner descendants. This interpretation of the relationship between them is supported by the fact that Wagner is the same age as Karl Ludwig, if older Nietzsche is still alive. It is also worth noting that Nietzsche was over-expressing artists with intense temperament, bluff, ambition, self-interest, and sublime - a typical feature feared to show "genius" in the 19th century. In short, Nietzsche was shocked by the personality of Wagner. The more mature Nietzsche later did not deny the importance of Wagner's influence on his emotional and intellectual paths, but the estimate of Wagner's work of Nieheze changed considerably in his life I guess. In the so-called early stages, this pressure continues to reach Nietzsche.

It is lonely without the white playboy, fashion culture and fashion observer who had kept us 88 years old due to the limits of architects and bad habits of American society. In an article of 1970, he is a person who created the term "radical fashion". Tom Wolff was one of the pioneers of American journalism and abandoned nonfiction works in the early 1980s and focused on his very successful first novel The Vanity Bonfire (1987). He (1981) caused a sensation in the architectural world, the negative impact of some kind of architecture brought by immigrant European architects in the 1930s - cruelty about the quality of life in the 20th century United States article. Mr. Wolf considers this to be an intellectual invasion and injects American culture into rationalism that gradually leads to international style. Gropius and his Bauhaus, Le Corbusier, and postmodernism changed to reflect the boredom of his fighting attempt. He tells stories of these legendary architects filled with anecdotes and depth, and the way he robs them of their basic human nature is exciting. "Walter Gropius, the Prince of Silver, a white god, a young architect stepped into his study, some of whom have not happened for decades like Philip Johnson" "Le Corbusier, Mr. Purismism, he showed everyone how to become a famous architect without a building, he built a shining city in his skull." "Ludwig Meiss van der Rohe, a white god, he put half of America in a cube of a German worker's house" "Frank Lloyd Wright, he's looking at the future of American architecture, looking at the face of Walter Gropius, he is not happy" "Like Frank Lloyd Wright and Gough and Green, Stone and Saarinen are too narrow (not international style), which means bourgeoisie." "Eisenman's wonderful genius is to use a relatively clear language in linguistic terms to directly incorporate the human brain into Harrus." Skepticism about modernism is not limited to the UK. In the United States, Tom Wolf wrote from Bauhaus to our house, from Bauhaus directly to the United States to explain the Prince of European silver, he wrote that he built houses that look like worker's house and pesticide factory. Reliable point He suggested that any attempt to actually sit on the Le Corbusier's reclining chair would adopt karate behind his neck. "In modernism attacks on inhumane behavior, and in the extreme case anything that can be filled with contemporary nicknames has concluded that modernism can not find beauty and that it is not worth it. I thought, "Wilk said. The mind still believes in the early moral mission of modernists. Therefore, the crime of a concrete tower where Le Corbusier's design is inadequate and construction is inadequate has little to do with his work. The wolf suddenly came to our house from Bauhaus and finished his question. But the answer is in its early stages, Wolff explained the first principle that Gropius and his colleagues built Bauhaus. They were so excited by the new industrial era and they named themselves as Prince. I think there are many designers close to many things today, but that is more than just the possibilities of new materials and manufacturing processes. Design enthusiasm, such as behavioral interventions, nudging in the "correct" direction of people, most people meaning "right" or supporting loyalty, is one example of the same impulses leading to machines is. To survive This is synonymous with a hero designer, bring new knowledge to customers, educate customers, and improve customer hobbies. Walter Gropius and other Bauhaus teachers and graduates play Moses' role and can acquire knowledge that has not been washed from the mountain even if it is not washed. I passed the director of the Yale museum. Designers have problems as a convincing taste maker. Mr. Wolf said how modernist luxury clients feel dissatisfied with the design of architects and how people working in modernist architecture impose restrictions on their "living machines" I

I chose John Edwards for the whole article of entertainment weekly. In this paper, their website explains skeptics, revealing all paranormal phenomena. Skepticism John Edwards will also focus on the medium known as cold leader (http://skeptics.com.au). In this article, John Edwards is listed as "the intersection with John Edwards", which is named after the program is a collection of Sci-Fi channels, which has recently been reborn as a nationwide syndicated series. In a long program, John Edwards chose people around his audience and randomly. As it is a new thing, for me who did not expect something special when we saw in class, "John Edwards and Crossover". My students generally express their opinions, but I decided to keep my mind open. When I was watching lots of ideas of video clips in my mind, and the effectiveness of the program, it is one of them ... lack thereof. When my grandfather passed away, I am very attached to him, so I am sad. But to my strong religious beliefs, then I am sure he went to heaven and he was dead. Because this is not what you do in heaven, in my opinion, please consult a person on the earth whether he did not intersect. Of course, things did John Edwards for some people, obstacles may be reliable, but for those who follow the principles of his, "gifts" are for those who overcome the loss It seems. In a program such as crossing over, John Edward 's group of audience members who are in contact with the soul of the audience (also called' the greatest impulse in the universe ', also known as South Park) I insisted on others. Looking pretty quickly, he can find someone who believes that he did not try to communicate with the dead relatives. Also, it is very easy to implement. You need to do is to make your reading as ambiguous as. Keep in mind that these people always say, "I am looking for this man just like those people, a man named Bob, a man named Bob." In the audience, he was called Bob who died I know to find a man with a name It is not a difficult thing. Or perhaps mentally, they say "they have a mental problem, I see the relative of the people, the elderly." Powerhouse, John McNab, Dance Floor, Curtain, Pathological River Gap: Edward Laiteng is a novel by fictitious character of John Bakan. (Although "Powerhouse" originally published in magazine in 1913) published in the first 1916 publications, these years are seen after the last bakan's death, ie 1 year, 1941. Leithen name is borrowed from Leithen Water, Leithen Water is a tributary of the Tweed River, it is one of many reference Scottish Border Bakan novels Even after John took part, Edward began to get worse soon as the relationship between the two kings continued to claim Scottish authority. Bruce · MEP is supported against King Edward John King Comyn and his allies. Robert I and his father thought John was a robber. In the case of opposition to Scotland, Edward agreed to hear the appeal of the case during the Scottish Business Transition Guardian Court rulings. In the case of the son of Fief Malcolm MacDuff's Count, Edward John appeared in front of the British Parliament to provoke suspicions personally and there was provocation necessary. This is done by the king of Scotland, but the last straw was the Edward requirement of the Scottish giant to provide military service in the war with the British France. This was unacceptable, formed an alliance with Scotland and France. We will act under the name of John King of the Congress led by Comyn to convene the meeting at Scottish host Caddonlee on March 11

It is lonely without the white playboy, fashion culture and fashion observer who had kept us 88 years old due to the limits of architects and bad habits of American society. In an article of 1970, he is a person who created the term "radical fashion". Tom Wolff was one of the pioneers of American journalism and abandoned nonfiction works in the early 1980s and focused on his very successful first novel The Vanity Bonfire (1987). He (1981) caused a sensation in the architectural world, the negative impact of some kind of architecture brought by immigrant European architects in the 1930s - cruelty about the quality of life in the 20th century United States article. Mr. Wolf considers this to be an intellectual invasion and injects American culture into rationalism that gradually leads to international style. Gropius and his Bauhaus, Le Corbusier, and postmodernism changed to reflect the boredom of his fighting attempt. He tells stories of these legendary architects filled with anecdotes and depth, and the way he robs them of their basic human nature is exciting. "Walter Gropius, the Prince of Silver, a white god, a young architect stepped into his study, some of whom have not happened for decades like Philip Johnson" "Le Corbusier, Mr. Purismism, he showed everyone how to become a famous architect without a building, he built a shining city in his skull." "Ludwig Meiss van der Rohe, a white god, he put half of America in a cube of a German worker's house" "Frank Lloyd Wright, he's looking at the future of American architecture, looking at the face of Walter Gropius, he is not happy" "Like Frank Lloyd Wright and Gough and Green, Stone and Saarinen are too narrow (not international style), which means bourgeoisie." "Eisenman's wonderful genius is to use a relatively clear language in linguistic terms to directly incorporate the human brain into Harrus." Skepticism about modernism is not limited to the UK. In the United States, Tom Wolf wrote from Bauhaus to our house, from Bauhaus directly to the United States to explain the Prince of European silver, he wrote that he built houses that look like worker's house and pesticide factory. Reliable point He suggested that any attempt to actually sit on the Le Corbusier's reclining chair would adopt karate behind his neck. "In modernism attacks on inhumane behavior, and in the extreme case anything that can be filled with contemporary nicknames has concluded that modernism can not find beauty and that it is not worth it. I thought, "Wilk said. The mind still believes in the early moral mission of modernists. Therefore, the crime of a concrete tower where Le Corbusier's design is inadequate and construction is inadequate has little to do with his work. The wolf suddenly came to our house from Bauhaus and finished his question. But the answer is in its early stages, Wolff explained the first principle that Gropius and his colleagues built Bauhaus. They were so excited by the new industrial era and they named themselves as Prince. I think there are many designers close to many things today, but that is more than just the possibilities of new materials and manufacturing processes. Design enthusiasm, such as behavioral interventions, nudging in the "correct" direction of people, most people meaning "right" or supporting loyalty, is one example of the same impulses leading to machines is. To survive This is synonymous with a hero designer, bring new knowledge to customers, educate customers, and improve customer hobbies. Walter Gropius and other Bauhaus teachers and graduates play Moses' role and can acquire knowledge that has not been washed from the mountain even if it is not washed. I passed the director of the Yale museum. Designers have problems as a convincing taste maker. Mr. Wolf said how modernist luxury clients feel dissatisfied with the design of architects and how people working in modernist architecture impose restrictions on their "living machines" I

Enlightenment, the philosophical movement of the 18th century, is characterized by the power of human reasons and innovation in politics, religion, and educational theory. Pre-entertainment, noun · pre-entertainment, noun Definition of British pre-entertainment dictionary In the 1660's, "inspired behavior" was born from Enlightenment + -ment. It is used only for figurative meaning, spiritual enlightenment, etc. In 1865, as a translation of German Aufklärung, the name of the spirit and institution of the mainland philosopher of the 18th century The philosophy of enlightenment adheres to the essential autonomy of human beings. People are responsible to themselves, responsible for their own reasonable interests, responsible for their own self-development, and responsible for the welfare of their brothers by inevitable expansion. For philosophers, people are not sinners, at least not born; humanity - this statement is destructive by its origin, in fact is revolutionary, or by origin, or at least neutral. In this way, human antisocial passion has undeniable power, but individuals may want to improve through their own efforts instead of prayer, instead of education, participation in politics, and reform activities Hmm. [Peter Gay, "Enlightenment"] New Culture Literacy Dictionary, 3rd Edition Copyright © 2005 Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company. Houghton Published by Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company. Copyright Okay, men and girls, ready to enlightenment In this lesson I will introduce enlightenment. what is that? Enlightenment, also known as the age of enlightenment, was an intellectual movement from the late 17th century to the early 18th century, emphasizing reasons, individualism, and skepticism. Enlightenment challenged the traditional religious view. Because that was such a wide movement, enlightenment did not have an accurate start date. It did not pop up, but it gradually developed. Most historians came to the beginning of enlightenment from the middle of the 17th century to the beginning of the 18th century. The work of intellectuals like Rene Descartes, Barus Spinoza, Isaac Newton is particularly important for enlightenment. It is impossible to talk about enlightenment unless we talk about the political leap of this age. Historians follow the scientific beginning of enlightenment to Principal Mathematicala written by Sir Isaac Newton in 1686. This work is considered to be a major part of philosophy driving science, mathematics, and enlightenment, in combination with John Locke's "Papers on Human Understanding" (1689). It is said that enlightenment really started in the American Revolutionary War of 1776. The idea of ​​rotation around people's minds by writers like Thomas Paine, John Locke, Thomas Jefferson, eventually attempted the Republic for the first time in Roman times. As with the rest of enlightenment, the founders of the United States returned to the classical era and planned how they would like to manage their new country.

There are different kinds of miracles that exist in people who have reasons to believe them. Thomas Hume thinks that the miracle is not real. He said that all "miracles" have reasonable explanations behind them and rational methods to explain them. On the contrary, survivors of environments almost imaginable will regard their existence as a phenomenon or a miracle. On the other hand, there are philosophers who reasonably understand why miracles do not exist, but on the other hand survivors associate life and death with a certain miracle. David Hume's "miracle" in David Hume's paper? miracle,? Hume has advocated various arguments about why people should not trust any miracle. Hume does not believe that miracles do not exist, but do not believe it because there is no reasonable background. One of his arguments, by definition, miracle is incredible. And there is no reasonable way to believe in miracles. Another argument is that most miracles often come from non-civilized interpretation or define miracles; miracles are violations of natural laws that are unusual for most people. When Hume said: "Nothing is considered a miracle, if it happened in a common process of nature, then he will explain this very clearly. A man that looks healthy will suddenly die It is not a miracle. "Hume, p. 888) Hume said that this death is abnormal, but it seems to happen naturally. Miraculous memory David Hume's "fairness about human understanding" is obvious, and he believes that no miracles will occur. Hume is a logical person who believes in knowledge experience. Of course, such people do not witness them, it is difficult to believe in extraordinary ideas. Especially when these events require a lot of faith. In order for the incident to be regarded as a miracle, it must violate the laws of nature. But, that is the same legal chief. David Hume devoted himself to part of his philosophy and tried to ignore his wrong assertion about the soul. In Hume's doubt, the German idealist began with Emmanuel Kant and left various cognitive and metaphysical problems. David Hume is an Scottish empiricist and became a philosopher for his metaphysical skepticism and explanation of his mind. Hume was born in the 18th century Critical views of Hume's work in the 19th and 20th centuries often reflect the differences in the 18th century, but added a more detailed analysis of Hume's history and philosophical method. Thomas Jefferson declared, "If Hume is faithful, it will be the best historical fragment ever," and Hume said, "I held down the truth, lied, forged the authorities, forged the record" Added. Drich von Schlegel found a more admirable praise in Hume's words, but he also imposed on Hugh's party his own "narrow view of the principle and things is not entirely fair". Nonetheless, Hume's work - history and philosophy - has the first important biographer, John Hilbert, of their supporters Hume. Thomas H. Huxley also gave Hume a basic explanation with details of his philosophy.

My complaint about Plato Athene I tried to keep quiet, but I can not stick to it anymore. I must tell you I will not succumb to the threat of compulsion, intimidation or violence. But first, I have to talk a while ago, I have to talk about how stubborn and cynical I am about me, and Plato's nonsense, fraud, misbehavior and cheating It is enough. Then I will back up and fill in some details. Okay, so starting with the general things, some of the facts I'm trying to present may seem shocking. The following content about Plato Athens' complaint actually hurts. But for Plato's ongoing promotional activities by Athenians and his partner, I feel that it is my responsibility to write this article. However, before studying the current situation, it is important to clear the darkness in Plato's heart. One of his slaves once said, "Things have never been so good." - I complained about Plato 's Athenians. I tried to keep quiet, but I can not take it anymore. I must tell you I will not succumb to the threat of compulsion, intimidation or violence. But first, I have to talk a while ago, I have to talk about how stubborn and cynical I am about me, and Plato's nonsense, fraud, misbehavior and cheating It is enough. Then I will back up and fill in some details Plato was born in 428 BC to 427 BC, probably in Athens, when Athens' democracy developed very well. He is affluent and belongs to a family of aristocrats. Because Plato's family is involved in the politics of Athens, Plato is probably not unfamiliar with politics itself. He is also the founder of the Athens Academy. This can be regarded as the first university and its first philosophy school in western European countries. He passed away from 348 BC to 347 BC. Philosophically, Plato was influenced by the tradition of skepticism including question of his teacher Socrates who was also a star of Plato's dialogue. For many early Greek philosophers it is clear that we live in a world that is not a truly simple source, that is eternal, unchangeable knowledge. The world is constantly changing. The season reflects the change. There is nothing permanent. The building collapses, people, animals, trees live and die PLATO was born around 427 BC. Please enter famous Athens family Ariston and a description. I was interested in politics of young people, but I was dissatisfied with the cruel and immoral behavior of the rulers of Athens. When Athens abolished its dictatorship and established a democratic regime, there was hint of hope; but when citizens took the philosopher Socrates to be tried and later executed, Plato I left Athens for traveling abroad. In 387 BC, Plato finally founded a philosophical and scientific knowledge center, Academy that returns to Athens and provides academic training in the fields of astronomy, bioscience, mathematics and political science. From this influential institution, Plato's most famous student, Aristotle, came out. Plato devoted himself to college until his death in 347 BC

Brief History of Modern Architecture In the case of irony and irony, this is not an objective history, but it is written by Wolf's defeat of the 20th century building tendency. I studied this era in the history of architecture, I do not recommend them to people who are not familiar with modern architectural key figures, emphasizing the architects themselves rather than their own designs. Skepticism about modernism is not limited to the UK. In the United States, Tom Wolf wrote from Bauhaus to our house, from Bauhaus directly to the United States to explain the Prince of European silver, he wrote that he built houses that look like worker's house and pesticide factory. Reliable point He suggested that any attempt to actually sit on the Le Corbusier's reclining chair would adopt karate behind his neck. "In modernism attacks on inhumane behavior, and in the extreme case anything that can be filled with contemporary nicknames has concluded that modernism can not find beauty and that it is not worth it. I thought, "Wilk said. The mind still believes in the early moral mission of modernists. Therefore, the crime of a concrete tower where Le Corbusier's design is inadequate and construction is inadequate has little to do with his work. The wolf suddenly came to our house from Bauhaus and finished his question. But the answer is in its early stages, Wolff explained the first principle that Gropius and his colleagues built Bauhaus. They were so excited by the new industrial era and they named themselves as Prince. I think there are many designers close to many things today, but that is more than just the possibilities of new materials and manufacturing processes. Design enthusiasm, such as behavioral interventions, nudging in the "correct" direction of people, most people meaning "right" or supporting loyalty, is one example of the same impulses leading to machines is. To survive This is synonymous with a hero designer, bring new knowledge to customers, educate customers, and improve customer hobbies. Walter Gropius and other Bauhaus teachers and graduates play Moses' role and can acquire knowledge that has not been washed from the mountain even if it is not washed. I passed the director of the Yale museum. Designers have problems as a convincing taste maker. Mr. Wolf said how modernist luxury clients feel dissatisfied with the design of architects and how people working in modernist architecture impose restrictions on their "living machines" I often speak about what. For Gropius and Mies, Philip Johnson and others, if the customer is not satisfied, it is because they are caught by their bourgeois view, not because the building is bad.