From Bauhaus to Our House

It is lonely without the white playboy, fashion culture and fashion observer who had kept us 88 years old due to the limits of architects and bad habits of American society.

In an article of 1970, he is a person who created the term "radical fashion". Tom Wolff was one of the pioneers of American journalism and abandoned nonfiction works in the early 1980s and focused on his very successful first novel The Vanity Bonfire (1987). He (1981) caused a sensation in the architectural world, the negative impact of some kind of architecture brought by immigrant European architects in the 1930s - cruelty about the quality of life in the 20th century United States article. Mr. Wolf considers this to be an intellectual invasion and injects American culture into rationalism that gradually leads to international style. Gropius and his Bauhaus, Le Corbusier, and postmodernism changed to reflect the boredom of his fighting attempt. He tells stories of these legendary architects filled with anecdotes and depth, and the way he robs them of their basic human nature is exciting.

"Walter Gropius, the Prince of Silver, a white god, a young architect stepped into his study, some of whom have not happened for decades like Philip Johnson"

"Le Corbusier, Mr. Purismism, he showed everyone how to become a famous architect without a building, he built a shining city in his skull."

"Ludwig Meiss van der Rohe, a white god, he put half of America in a cube of a German worker's house"

"Frank Lloyd Wright, he's looking at the future of American architecture, looking at the face of Walter Gropius, he is not happy"

"Like Frank Lloyd Wright and Gough and Green, Stone and Saarinen are too narrow (not international style), which means bourgeoisie."

"Eisenman's wonderful genius is to use a relatively clear language in linguistic terms to directly incorporate the human brain into Harrus."

Skepticism about modernism is not limited to the UK. In the United States, Tom Wolf wrote from Bauhaus to our house, from Bauhaus directly to the United States to explain the Prince of European silver, he wrote that he built houses that look like worker's house and pesticide factory. Reliable point He suggested that any attempt to actually sit on the Le Corbusier's reclining chair would adopt karate behind his neck. "In modernism attacks on inhumane behavior, and in the extreme case anything that can be filled with contemporary nicknames has concluded that modernism can not find beauty and that it is not worth it. I thought, "Wilk said. The mind still believes in the early moral mission of modernists. Therefore, the crime of a concrete tower where Le Corbusier's design is inadequate and construction is inadequate has little to do with his work.

The wolf suddenly came to our house from Bauhaus and finished his question. But the answer is in its early stages, Wolff explained the first principle that Gropius and his colleagues built Bauhaus. They were so excited by the new industrial era and they named themselves as Prince. I think there are many designers close to many things today, but that is more than just the possibilities of new materials and manufacturing processes. Design enthusiasm, such as behavioral interventions, nudging in the "correct" direction of people, most people meaning "right" or supporting loyalty, is one example of the same impulses leading to machines is. To survive

This is synonymous with a hero designer, bring new knowledge to customers, educate customers, and improve customer hobbies. Walter Gropius and other Bauhaus teachers and graduates play Moses' role and can acquire knowledge that has not been washed from the mountain even if it is not washed. I passed the director of the Yale museum. Designers have problems as a convincing taste maker. Mr. Wolf said how modernist luxury clients feel dissatisfied with the design of architects and how people working in modernist architecture impose restrictions on their "living machines" I often speak about what. For Gropius and Mies, Philip Johnson and others, if the customer is not satisfied, it is because they are caught by their bourgeois view, not because the building is bad.