Open Theism vs. Closed Theism

Topics of open and closed topics have evoked my curiosity over the past few years. This topic was discussed in the meantime with a lot of people. I have heard various opinions, but some people insist on God's omniscience and future knowledge, and other ideas to present persuasive arguments for free will. However, most people are in the third category, our brain can not understand God's work and I am satisfied to wait for an answer until they can ask them when they arrive in Heaven is.

Skepticism is a combination of two arguments. The first argument of skepticism is that "theology" is roughly a view of the existence of God and "God" is a title representing completeness, theology is true. It is presumed that this is explained in some theological forms of Judaism classical Western theology, Christianity, Islam, and Oriental religion. The second argument is that some form of skepticism is correct, and this skepticism applies to the human ability to judge everything God does or in circumstances given. Not all advocates are skeptics, and not all philosophers who support skeptical skepticism are advocates. As it is the most suspicious component, it will be the focus below.

Like other forms of skepticism, there are critics in skepticism as well. Some of these critics claim that skepticism adversely affects important issues of theology (God's knowledge, relations with God, etc.). Other critics believe that skeptical theology adversely affects more common problems such as everyday knowledge and moral life. Opposing opinions on skepticism can be roughly divided into five types. One of the critical criticisms of skepticism is that it eliminates the possibility of a close relationship between humans and God. This is implemented in two ways. First, if skepticism weakens the assertion on the existence of God by emphasizing the fact that he knows little about how God acts, then by the inference of reasoning, it also argues against the existence of God It will weaken.