Presuppositions Of The Game Theory

Soloman, the premise of game theory, thinks that as game theory becomes more complicated, we tend to ignore the problem rather than solving the problem. He thinks that the problem is not New Hobbes (or Rawls) but how to think about business and yourself like Aristotle, and I think the game theory model is just a preset. Soloman discusses seven presets in the first part of his book, Moral and Excellence. They are: reason and attention, motivation and self-interest, money and measurement, anomaly of altruism, good and goal, open field, and role of rule.

Under the premise of philosophy, the fundamental difference in the theory of natural law is rooted in the essence of law, the essence of man, and the philosophical premise of the meaning of "nature". The meaning of natural law theory of Roman Catholicism, Protestantism, and secular humanism will be constrained by these philosophical assumptions from the beginning. Indeed, many theological differences have found the ultimate source of division among philosophical assumptions. For those who tend to think that metaphysical knowledge is not as admirable as professional logic science, nature, people, laws, and intelligence of God are increasingly skeptical. All these obstacles of deep philosophical significance, even if the existence of the law of nature is the closest, it is difficult to accept it.

Philosophy Skepticism comes from knowledge theory, and one area of ​​philosophy is called "epistemology". Epistemology studies the foundation of our belief and the source of our concept. It reveals a default preset that may prove often wrong, and this is what we really know. Start with Hawking and let Einstein speak the truth. It is easy to get the authority to accept concepts that are proved useful when ordering things, as we forget their secular origins as unchangeable gifts. Therefore, they are classified as "essentials of thinking", "transcendental gifts", and so on. The path of scientific progress has often been impossible for such a mistake for a long time. Therefore, it is not an idle game if you analyze long-term general concepts, indicate the circumstances in which their reasons and usefulness depends, how they grow from just the number of experiences.