Extreme rationalism rationalism is the idea that we can gain knowledge only through the process of mind. Empiricism is the idea that knowledge can only be gained through sensation. Because it is the basis of the scientific way of life we use, the Western world employs empiricism. Various common proverbs such as "I believe in seeing" and "listening with my ears" indicate that we have accepted the use of sensations without a doubt.
"Their extreme rationalism is a completely irrational creature through" observation "of all" reasonable "motives. If you obey the contrary or commit suicide, obey the urge. Topic 9: conquest of nature by humans is the consequence of nature by nature, that is, the natural impulse of the conditioner is the result of "human" including the conditioner itself. Masculinity - unconscious nature dominates regulators and dominates all humans through them.
After political drama dust settled in the second half of the 18th century the extreme rationalism and skepticism supported by the Enlightenment reached that limit. Some people do not want to see humanity through a reasonable microscope. Romanticism came as an antidote. The era from Newton 's "Principia" ended in 1798 with the publication of "Sentimental Song" by Wordsworth and Coleridge. Among them, the poet wrote: "Not the wisdom, but the deep power of happiness, we see the things of life."
The experience of "absurd world" has created a new kind of extreme rationalism that separates such thought style from all fascist thought. However, the new rationalism ignores systematization. Thoughts are temporarily placed between "absurd feelings" and their understanding, art, and philosophy. Here, part of it: Camus refuses the existence of philosophy: the latter "interprets" the mysteries, streamlines ridiculous things, and distorts that reality. For him, the only complete performance lays a stupid life, while artistic creation rejects rationalization ("raisonner Ie concret") and covers up "nonsense ith image" ("Ce qui n" On the other hand, Sartre is trying to develop "experience" into a specific human existence philosophy: there is no appeal to explain the structure "in an absurd world" and "ethics of ethics" .