Necessary Action to Fight Against Global Warming

One of the main challenges facing the earth is global warming. Global warming is a phenomenon in which, in addition to a slow temperature rise due to high levels of fossil fuels such as carbon dioxide, forest cutting (reduction of forest trees) is placed in the atmosphere of the earth with the sun's radiant heat is. It is also known as the greenhouse effect as it adversely affects our environment. In order to solve this problem, it is necessary to take actions that use recyclable and inexhaustible resources such as wind, sun, and water to take actions that are "environmentally friendly".

In the United States, global warming is often a partisan political issue. Republicans tend to oppose actions that they believe are unproven threats and Democrats support actions that they believe will reduce global warming and its impact by controlling greenhouse gas emissions There is a tendency. Climatologist Kevin E. Trenberth stated that: SPM has been approved by the government. The argument here is that scientists decide what they can say, but the government will decide how to say it best. We negotiate through wording to ensure accuracy, balance, clarity of information, and relevance and relevance to policy. The IPCC process depends on the intention of creating participants' balanced evaluations. However, in Shanghai, some people, especially Saudi Arabia, are trying to slow down and even potentially confuse the information in the report.

In the 1980s, under the guidance of President Ronald Reagan, anti-environmentalismists learned that aggressive attacks on the law could oppose strong public opposition and increase the public's support for environmental problems It was. In the fight against global warming regulations, the opponents decided to challenge not only the proposed government rules, but also the definition of problems to be solved. In response to its discovery and discussion, the scientific basis for the beliefs of opponents to global warming caused by humans has caused "environmental skepticism". The refusal coordinator shifted from a question about the survey result to a full-scale attack on climate science. These agencies are aware of evidence of global warming against scientific peer review and attacks by agencies such as the National Academy of Sciences. In the past quarter century, the majority of network participants have cooperated.