Politics and Christian Obligation

We believe that the day we can not change the world is a day we believe we can not influence our neighbors; the neighbors that influence us are part of the world. There is a potential trend, politics is not commendable for Christian interactions, and at best it should be kept: law based moral philosophy. I think these opinions are wrong. Politics is a human effort worthy of dialogue with people who hold theology of the Bible. In short, Christians have an obligation to interact in politics.

Therefore, this article will first briefly introduce the issue of political obligation. Next, the second part looks at the conceptual problems posed by political obligations, including its implications for political obligations. The third part focuses on skepticism, paying special attention to anarchists who deny political obligations but do not want to abolish the state, which is called philosophy. In Part 4, we survey the main competitors in various political obligation theories currently being provided, summarize the thesis in Part 5, and briefly discuss the recent pluralism or "multi-principle" method proposal To do.

In the 20th century, political philosophers focused on a comprehensive attempt to design at least the analysis of political obligations and the concepts involved and the theory of compliance with legal obligations. Some believe that the existence of political obligations can only be determined by concept analysis - we return to this in § 3. More generally, philosophers working in this way try to clarify problems in claiming or denying political obligations or in keeping the law.

The immediate problem arising from this concept of political obligation is whether "politics" is a suitable transformationist. If the obligation is to comply with the law, why is not it called a legal obligation if other conditions remain the same? Or, Bhikhu Parekh (1993, p.240), our obligation to comply with the law is actually a matter of citizen's obligation, "respect and protect civic authorities' legal obligation" I do not conclude that there is. The obligation is "not a political obligation," follow the law enacted by the administration "? Parek believes that "politics" is a wider term and that those with real political obligations will bear her politics, not following their laws. Raz 2006, p. 1004) Such people have an active obligation to ensure safety and take measures to promote their own interests.