The Human Comedy Critical Essays

After his successful Broadway theater "Time of Your Life" (pr., P. 1939) and his short story collection "My Name Is Aram" (1940), William Saroyan is a Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (MGM ). I hired a major movie in December 1941 (And he believed, directly). The script of the movie "Human Comedy" (1943) was completed in February 1942. However, shortly after the work was completed, Sarayan was dismissed from the movie project due to disagreement with the studio director Rui. B. Meyer, about direction. Then he began to turn his screenplay into a novel. It was published shortly before the movie was released and was published at the beginning of 1943. The history of the development of this novel explains in part the features of that episode: it consists of short chapters that can not make an obvious transition from scene to scene quickly. This style has changed a little, but it is used earlier in As I Lay Dying (1930), in Saroyan's work, also by William Faulkner's work. It worked very well.

Human comedy underscores the familiarity, simplicity, and the kindness inherent in the working class, which apparently belongs to the pattern of literary attempts to return to traditional values ​​from the 1930s to the early 1940s . Like the Joad family of John Steinbeck's "The Grapes of Wrath" (1939), the Macauley family is prevalent in toughness through toughness, perseverance and deep-seated feeling. Thus, a fictitious family life event in Ithaca, California, based on the authors' own experience raised in Fresno, California at the beginning of the century, represents the greater America in the Great Depression and in World War II . Please experience. Even though the content of this novel occasionally became sentimental, Sarroyan's work still has advantages and freshness.

In this article by Prospect, Julian Gough explicitly explained the comedy he traced back to the Greeks, and Russian linguist / theorist / philosopher MM Bakhtin called it a "carnival" . In this comedy tradition, the comedy's text (or performance) answers, "Our endless and repetitive painful cycle, fear of it, we can not escape it," human life It represents a completely invisible view of. Laughter stopped. Gough did not use that term in his articles, but Bakhtin further called this attitude about human relations "extreme skepticism". Authority is not escaped from the corrosive view of such laughter, and the acts and discourses presented with "frank seriousness" will not be taken seriously after all.

Bergson and Meredith 's essays have both been criticized for limiting the scope of laughter to the power of their ridicule, focusing on comedy as a social correction force. This charge is more destructive to Meredith's article than Bergson's article. Regardless of the latter's limit, it is still exploring the meaning of its own thesis in a very thorough way. The result is a rigorous analysis of the causes and effects of cartoons, and no students appreciate this There is no doubt. Bergson 's comments on comedy have the greatest relationship, and they appear to be mostly built. Most of his examples are taken from the example of Morieres, Bergson's own dramatic element of contemporary contemporary Eugène-Marin Labiche. These suggest that Bergson 's comedy field has few highlights for this type of analysis.

French philosopher Henri Bergson was theorized in the essay "The Comey". Bergson thinks cartoon characters are rigid or inflexible when they need the resilience of the soul. Or body. Furthermore, since the character repeatedly fails to change rigid behavior, repeatedly changes the hardness to a mechanical appearance like a jack box, so laughter increases.