Moral Responsibility

Does he take charge of breaking the law if a person predicts that his actions could violate his actions against the law? In legal theory and ethical theory, this vision is enough to take responsibility as people have long accepted the principle of responsibility for such people. But in recent years, both philosophers and lawyers have expressed concern about this principle. Common in old books is legitimate, (...)

It refers to a series of views that seriously recognize that skepticism about moral responsibility, or more frequently moral responsibility skepticism, never will be morally specified in a specific but universal sense in humans . His behavior is responsible. This emotion is often distinguished by the basic desert concept and is defined as behavioral control that the agent truly deserves for criticism and praise. Some ethical skeptics are completely refusing the concept of this moral responsibility. Others believe that, although possible, our best philosophical and scientific theory about the world provides a powerful and compelling reason to question doubts about moral responsibility.

Some philosophers do not distinguish between freedom and moral responsibility. More carefully, they tend to "go back" to the concept of freedom, starting with the concept of moral responsibility; the concept of freedom does not give independent content (apart from the analysis of moral responsibility). For such philosophers, "freedom" means any condition of choice or participation in a morally responsible way. It is not clear what people think about the word "free will". Perhaps the main feature in the history of philosophy is that it is like a free state of moral responsibility. Broadly speaking, the idea is that in order to be morally responsible for something, you must have some freedom at the appropriate time before you take responsible actions or results. The meaning of this freedom, whatever it is, calls it "free will".

The existence of free will seem to be premised on the concept of moral responsibility. Most people will agree that they can not be morally responsible for what people can not act. Furthermore, moral praise and accusation, or compensation and punishment seems to be meaningful only under the assumption that the agent is morally responsible. (1) People have free will and their behavior is not determined by their circumstances, past experience, psychological and personality characteristics. Or, (2) There is no one who has no will, in that case no one morally responsible. This dilemma is a matter of moral responsibility.