"In your philosophy, heaven and earth are more than dreams" (Shakespeare, 211). The quotation from William Shakespeare's "The tragedy of Prince Denmark Hamlet" presents a very good idea. It shows that in our modern philosophy, we are not even pulling out factors leading to the nature of things around us. Our philosophy focuses on the concept of causality. Regardless of whether people are aware of this, every point they claim is based on one reason and / or its influence. This is not necessarily important, but most people are too late to analyze the true relationship between the cause and its impact. David Hume did a wonderful job. David Hume was born in Edinburgh, Scotland. He first studied law at the University of Edinburgh. Hume served as secretary, librarian and embassy staff. David Hume went to France twice. He met Jean Jacques Rousseau, Diderot, d'Hollbach, Turgot, d'Alembert. When Rousseau came to England to find a job. Hume helped Rousseau find a job, and Rousseau could not stick to it for his prosecution. In addition, Hume does not allow us to apply the concept of "knowledge" to natural science. Hume distinguishes between what we call now analytical knowledge and the concept of de facto problems we currently call synthetic knowledge. Analysis, or prior knowledge and integration, posterior knowledge has the truth of two different standards David Hume Hume, David, 1711-76, Scottish philosopher, and historian. Hume brings empiricalism of John Rock and George Berkeley to the logical extremes of fundamental skepticism. He denied the possibility of certain kinds of knowledge and found a series of emotions in his mind and believed that the causal relationship in nature was entirely from B's introduction. The answer to the theme is drawn by the time committee named as illusion by David Hume, and the time committee named human by himself. In the era of modern philosophy, when the influence of Descartes was still important, David Hume brought the argument of killing the Descartes I created and skipping it like a ghost in human perception. You can see not only the theme but also the contrast between Hume and Descartes.

David Hume Hume, David, 1711-76, Scottish philosopher, and historian. Hume brings empiricalism of John Rock and George Berkeley to the logical extremes of fundamental skepticism. He denied the possibility of some kind of knowledge, found a series of emotions in his mind, and believed that the causal relationship in nature arises from the combination of the two kinds of impressions. David Hume was born in Edinburgh, Scotland. He first studied law at the University of Edinburgh. Hume served as secretary, librarian and embassy staff. David Hume went to France twice. He met Jean Jacques Rousseau, Diderot, d'Hollbach, Turgot, d'Alembert. When Rousseau came to England to find a job. Hume helped Rousseau find a job, and Rousseau could not stick to it for his prosecution. In addition, Hume does not allow us to apply the concept of "knowledge" to natural science. Hume distinguishes between what we call now analytical knowledge and the concept of de facto problems we currently call synthetic knowledge. Analysis, or prior knowledge and integration, posterior knowledge has the truth of two different standards David Hume Hume, David, 1711-76, Scottish philosopher, and historian. Hume brings empiricalism of John Rock and George Berkeley to the logical extremes of fundamental skepticism. He denied the possibility of certain kinds of knowledge and found a series of emotions in his mind and believed that the causal relationship in nature was entirely from B's introduction. The answer to the theme is drawn by the time committee named as illusion by David Hume, and the time committee named human by himself. In the era of modern philosophy, when the influence of Descartes was still important, David Hume brought the argument of killing the Descartes I created and skipping it like a ghost in human perception. You can see not only the theme but also the contrast between Hume and Descartes. An attractive similarity between William Okamem and David Hume, such as the general view of causality. Answer: Occam Hume's David Hume William did not deny a causal relationship. He accepted it. However, he says that empirical methods can not logically prove their necessity. For Hume, causality is what human beings naturally believe.

Hume's ultimate goal in his philosophical effort is to weaken the esoteric philosophy. By focusing on a rational aspect, Hume shows that philosophy has limitations. As he does not know the limit he suggests that he use as many reasons as he can, but when he comes to the border this is the limit. He doubts that we have to research reason and find something beyond reasonable capacity. Hume started his first exam by classifying its contents as perception. The ethics of Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) are in stark contrast to the ethics of David Hume (1711-1776). Hume's moral philosophical approach is experimental and empirical; Kant emphasizes the need to establish a moral foundation in transcendentalism. Hume said that the reason is just "slave of passion", while Kant establishes morality with the concept of his own concept. Hume considers the feelings of kindness and generosity as a correct moral motive and Kant saw the motive of responsibility - Hume usually regards it as the motive of second best or recession, thus giving a devotion to morality that gives special morality Uniquely represent. Value is conveyed to action. Although the moral views of Kant and Hume are hostile to each other in many ways, there is also an important relationship between them. After the break, the philosopher Emmanuel Conde started reforming metaphysics. Kant believes that metaphysics is impossible if Hume is right. However, Kant did not want to give way to Hume 's skepticism, so Kant began to criticize the possibility to explore and reform metaphysics. Kant began to criticize the quest for 'transcendental' knowledge in philosophy. Kant began looking for the "transcendental" principle that can reasonably be inferred to explain why he thinks it can not be detected. Kant believes that the only way we can get the necessary and universal thing is through 'a priori'. Kant found that the notion of causality is not the only concept to understand things 'a priori' but the metaphysics confirmed to consist completely of these concepts. (8) Kant argues that Hume 's view is that mathematical propositions are analyzed? It is totally different. ~ 1 1 If Hume uses Kant's term when discussing Hume, it means that the knowledge of mathematics is a priori! Indeed, as we learned from paragraph 2, this term is not strange for Hume; for CeUsal, Hume says. Regardless of any exception, knowledge of this relationship can not be obtained by a priori reasoning under any circumstances, but when it is found that specific objectives are often combined with each other, is. Make sure that things are presented to those with strong natural rationality and ability; if things are new to him, he will cause some cause or influence by the most accurate test of his reasonable quality You will not be able to find it either. (E 2 7) It is mathematics to rest here

Hume David Hume provided a well thought out plan for the formation of the government and its political activities. In addition, he acknowledged that certain government citizens may resist in special circumstances. But in terms of obedience and dishonesty, Hume did not give official revolutionary rules. We hope that Hume has more about the revolution and, more specifically, he believes there is a reason to carry out the revolution. Several authors like Richard H. Diss found the basis of Hume's explanation of a legitimate revolution in his historical research. Hume's report on the political turmoil of the 17th century was heavily dependent on the history of British rebellion and the Civil War of Earl of Clarendon (1646-69). Generally, Hume employs the position of a moderate royalist and believes that the revolution does not need to carry out necessary reforms. Hume is considered a conservative historian and emphasizes religious differences over constitutional problems. Laird Okie explained that "Hume is spreading the gentle virtue of politics but it is anti-frig, moderate anti-kinematic." Stuart is nothing beyond their predecessors. " "Hume wrote an anti-wage hostile action, but the paradox is that it is correct to regard a kind of established work and history that implicitly supports the control of the oligarchy regime." Historians believe that Hume is universal I have argued whether it has human nature or whether it allows evolution and development. Hume's epistemology David Hume is a Scottish philosopher known for his skepticism and empiricism. Hume strives to develop John Rock 's empiricism better through scientific research on our humanity. If we do not clarify this problem, we can not rely on common sense to explain human behavior. In other words, Hume said that it is urgent to observe how humans do this because humans are actually living and working in this world. The main John Locke, Berkeley, Hume are both empiricist philosophers. They all have different opinions but I agree with three things; the only source of real knowledge is unreliable inappropriate knowledge paths unless it is based on a solid foundation of sensual experience Some evidence shows that natural thinking in the mind is learned from experience. Every philosopher has developed some of the most attractive concepts.

Descartes, Plato and Hume's Thought A direct starting point for Plato's philosophical speculation is the teaching of Socrates. When Socrates tried to define the term of knowledge to refute skepticism of refinement, he taught that the only true knowledge is to acquire knowledge through concepts. He said that this concept represents all the reality of one thing. As Socrates uses, this is only a principle of knowledge. Plato regards it as the existence principle. "If this concept represents all the reality of things, reality needs to be in an ideal order, not necessarily things themselves, but on them, in one world" (Chaput, C . This article explains the similarities and differences between Rene Descartes and John Locke, David Hume and Plato. They each believe in rationalism or empiricism. In contrast to experience, rationalists think that a series of important basic concepts are intuitively and intuitively known. For rationalists, is knowledge born? From information sources such as sensation. They are known as Descartes, Plato. Experiors believe that all conception followers eventually return to experiences such as perception and emotion. What? There are no ideas or concepts without impressions or emotions. What? David Hume and Rene Descartes are philosophers who oppose the origins of ideas. Descartes believes in three types of ideas, namely birth, coincidence, and imagination. He said that God existed because of his existence, and from his thoughts on what is perfect like God. Meanwhile, Hume believes that the idea comes from one impression, an impression. Both theories have advantages and disadvantages, but I prefer Hume's theory over Descartes. Descartes believes that imagination does not help humans. Descartes' definition of thinking exists in thought, only things that represent others are called thinking. His argument is that the essence of thought that constitutes the heart can get God's idea, but on the contrary, humans can think about God in other ways. One of the main advantages of Descartes is his view of objective reality, which is a reality view. This idea can be explained in two ways. Classical philosophers such as Plato, Aristotle, Spinoza, Descartes, Hobbes, Hume, Rock, and others all understand emotions as the first concept to understand emotions without constituent elements. He believes that scientific psychology should stop thinking of emotions as 'an eternal and sacred spiritual entity like old and invariable species in natural history' (James 1890: 449). James's proposal is often called James Lange's theory and is similar to the theory provided by Lange (1885) that emotions are a perception sense of autonomy and changes in physiological conditions associated with exercise . Functions For example, when we think that we are in danger, this perception directly causes a series of physical reactions, and our understanding of these responses constitutes fear.

David Hume is an insightful philosopher and thinker and has shown us the problems we are constraining and what we are making the human nature a reality. Specifically, Hume is trying to persuade us to understand the facts. In this fact, we are based on life, form the custom on certain matters, and we are surrounding How do you adapt to the other things? After all, we do not know how things develop We can only assume past experiences, things will be customized and become customary through causality and casual language. David Hume Hume, David, 1711-76, Scottish philosopher, and historian. Hume brings empiricalism of John Rock and George Berkeley to the logical extremes of fundamental skepticism. He denied the possibility of certain kinds of knowledge and found a series of emotions in his mind and believed that the causal relationship in nature was entirely from B's introduction. The answer to the theme is drawn by the time committee named as illusion by David Hume, and the time committee named human by himself. In the era of modern philosophy, when the influence of Descartes was still important, David Hume brought the argument of killing the Descartes I created and skipping it like a ghost in human perception. You can see not only the theme but also the contrast between Hume and Descartes. Our recognition and memory The famous philosophers David Hume and Rene Descartes are those who are looking for answers and definitions of individual identity. Both of them considered their ideas and issued two different conclusions. Some people think that individual identity can not be understood, but others confirm that their certainty is their thinking and perception. David Hume begins discussing personal identity by denying this David Hume is studying physical and mental problems. Hume also investigated the person's character, the relationship between humans and animals, and the nature of the agent. Hume pointed out that we tend to think we are the same person five years ago. We have changed in various ways, but the same person appears there. You can start thinking about which functions can be changed without changing the fundamental self. However, Hume denies that there are differences between the various features of people and the magical self that is said to have these characteristics. "In addition to specific awareness, we will never pay close attention to anything - human beings are turning at incredible speed, a bunch or collection of different cognitions in constant flow and movement "

The direct starting point of Plato's philosophical speculation is the teaching of Socrates. When Socrates tried to define the term of knowledge to refute skepticism of refinement, he taught that the only true knowledge is to acquire knowledge through concepts. He said that this concept represents all the reality of one thing. As Socrates uses, this is merely the principle of knowledge. Plato regards it as the existence principle. "If this concept represents all the reality of things, the reality needs to be in an ideal order, not necessarily the objects themselves, but among them among themselves" (Chaput, C. p . 2). So, for this concept Plato has been replaced ... See more This is the work of philosophy. "Therefore, philosophy is trying to rise from phenomena or external knowledge to ontology or reality" (Chaput, C. p. 4) The view of Hume's philosophical thinking thinks that there are considerable differences in the perception of the heart when people feel overheating pain or warmth of warmth but this is caused by his imagination Is expected. These ideas look like one thing, but they can not reach the origin of thinking. Hume believes that when these feelings fell on us it can be said that we are almost watching whether it feels it. According to Hume, when we reflect past feelings and emotions, our idea is a faithful mirror and truly duplicates their purpose. He now believes that we can divide all spiritual perceptions into two categories or species. Lower coercion and vigor is often called thought or thought. Other species require names of languages, but other species do not have a specific purpose in philosophy. "So, we can use a bit of freedom, called impression, in a sense, using that word is different from usual" (Hume, 316). When we think about any of the emotions and behaviors above, the impression is different from the idea, and the idea is not so sharp awareness. At first glance, it seems nothing. David Hume and Rene Descartes are philosophers who oppose the origins of ideas. Descartes thinks that there are three kinds of ideas: a birth, a coincidence, and an imaginary thing. He said that God exists because of his existence, and from his thoughts on what is perfect like God. On the other hand, Hume thinks that one thought comes only from the impression. Both theories have advantages and disadvantages, but I prefer Hume's theory over Descartes. Descartes believes imagination can not help humans. The definition of Descartes' thinking exists in thinking, only things that represent other things are called thinking. His argument is that the essence of thinking that constitutes the heart can get God's idea, but on the contrary, humans can think about God in other ways. One of the main advantages of Descartes is his view of objective reality, which is a reality view. This article explains the similarities and differences between Rene Descartes and John Locke, David Hume and Plato. They each believe in rationalism or empiricism. Rationalists, in contrast to experience, think that a series of important basic concepts are intuitively and intuitively known. For rationalists, is knowledge born? From information sources such as sensation. They are known as Descartes, Plato. Experiors believe that all conceptual tracking ultimately returns to experiences such as perception and emotion. What? There are no ideas or concepts without impressions or emotions. What?

John Locke, Berkeley, Hume are both experienced philosophers. They all have different opinions, but I agree with three things; the only source of real knowledge is unreliable inappropriate knowledge paths unless it is based on a solid foundation of sensory experience A certain sensory experience Evidence indicates that natural thinking in the mind is learned from experience. Each of these philosophers formed some of the most fascinating concepts of our relationship with the surrounding world. Empiricism, a belief in the realization of knowledge through sensation, is the universal belief of several great contemporary philosophers. Perhaps the most famous empiricists are John Locke, George Berkeley and David Hume who are considered to be one of the most influential philosophers in the past 500 years. Due to the importance of experience in philosophical principles, each philosopher can be regarded as an experientist. More specifically, the empirical perspective of rock can be seen from his view on the primary and secondary nature of objects. David Hume Hume, David, 1711-76, Scottish philosopher, and historian. Hume brings empiricalism of John Rock and George Berkeley to the logical extremes of fundamental skepticism. He denied the possibility of certain kinds of knowledge and found a series of emotions in his mind and believed that the causal relationship in nature was entirely from B's introduction. The answer to the theme is drawn by the time committee named as illusion by David Hume, and the time committee named human by himself. In the era of modern philosophy, when the influence of Descartes was still important, David Hume brought the argument of killing the Descartes I created and skipping it like a ghost in human perception. You can see not only the theme but also the contrast between Hume and Descartes. Among the important philosophers related to empiricism are Aristotle, Thomas Aquinas, Francis Bacon, Thomas Hobbes, John Rock, George Berkeley, David Hume, and John Stuart Mill. Recently, positivists such as Mach, Vienna Circle, logical positivists, and most followers of analysis philosophy are empiricists. The central concept of scientific and scientific methods is that all evidence must be based on observable evidence by sensory or sensory extension empirically or empirically. It is distinguished from philosophical usage of empirical philosophy by using adjective "experience" or adverb "experience". Experience refers to the use of working assumptions used in combination with natural science and social science and can be tested or experimentally tested. In this sense, the scientific statement is the subject of our experience and observation and is derived from them.

I think that Hume's morals can be described as virtue ethics I am referring to the idea that which role will take precedence over action and action principles: practical with gentle role guidance and constraints Discussion. In traditional utilitarianism and Kant Ethics, personality is subject to actual deliberation. Only virtue is necessary to motivate benign behavior. I first outlined this approach with Aristotle's ethics and compared it with Hume. I think that the good character of Aristotle is understood as "self love". True self enthusiasts are most interested in using characteristics of judgment, selection, judgment, and removal. Hume studied moral judgment and started looking for meaning of moral terms. Hume does not find observable facts and logical relationships that answer the concepts of good, justice, moral virtue, but the function of moral terms is not to express quality or relationship but "recognized emotions" . I do not have any emotions in my judgment. The reason we call it good is the same as what we call beauty. If that object is comfortable immediately, or if it is a useful means to obtain other pleasant items, that object is good. Virtue is a "natural virtue" such as talent, wisdom, kindness, whether it is "human virtue" such as honesty or justice, makes a person happy or useful to himself or to others It is quality to be. In his work "Humanity theory", David Hume divides virtues into two categories, artificial virtue and natural virtue. Hume pointed out that courage is a natural virtue in paper. Among the paper's "pride and humility, its purpose and cause", Hume clearly shows that courage is the cause of pride. Witness, goodwill, learning, courage, justice, honesty, all these are the reasons for pride, and the opposite of their humility. In his argument about natural virtues, Hume 's debt to Greek ethics can be seen more clearly. Among them, the important group (consisting of courage, generosity, ambition, etc.) is based on self esteem and may even be a kind of self-esteem: "We call it a heroic virtue, it's great Praise the soul under sublime character.Stability and perfection of pride and self-esteem, or main engagement to that passion ... courage ... and all other shining virtues clearly among them It is a strong self-esteem and it is derived from their origin. A big advantage "(Hume, essay, 599-600). However, these virtues based on self-esteem must be influenced by the second group including generosity, compassion, loyalty, friendship, and otherwise the courageous qualities are "tyrant and public robber It is suitable only for making "(Hume, Treatise, 603)

For thousands of years, the mystery of consciousness has plagued humanity. We feel pain, hunger and other countless feelings, but this is a fact. We all know that we are conscious, but nobody has found out whether the human body is organized in a specific way leading to consciousness. The fact is that the existence of consciousness, the nature of knowledge can not be denied, regardless of the lack of a specific systematic de facto organization to explain it. According to Stanford University Philosophy Encyclopedia, David Hume (1711-1776) is a Scottish philosopher known for her reputation as an essayist. He is an influential empiricist, a human being is a group of people who do not have a true self (this is called the theory of deterrence), and morality is not based on moral principles but based on emotion I will. Isaac Newton (1642-1727) is a British mathematician and physicist who built the foundations of classical mechanics and calculus. According to data from the Isaac Newton Institute of Mathematical Sciences, Newton developed a movement and universal gravity law that improved understanding of the world of Copernicus. B. Introduction of David Hume's "Bundle" The outline of the theme (written as a response to Descartes) is drawn by a time council named David Hume as an illusion, and humans name it self. In the era of modern philosophy, when the influence of Descartes was still important, David Hume brought the argument of killing the Descartes I created and skipping it like a ghost in human perception. You can see not only the theme but also the contrast between Hume and Descartes. General Concept Study This busy term decided to focus on David Hume and W. K. Clifford Theory. David Hume is a very famous philosopher and takes the approach of attacking certain items he has strong opinions. He is a philosopher who attacks us as a simple thing that humans accept and gradually believes over time. First we start with his vision of David Hume and induction and generalization law. Then we will enter W. K. Clifford "I belong to (278) Then I will detail the criteria outlined by lock to explain the concept of persistent self.If you hurry from lock inference, I will introduce David Hume's self-concept as a bunch of ideas The juxtaposition of the self-essential proposition shows that John Rock's persistent self-view is flawed in considering David Hume's self-concept.

David Hume is considered a reputable and influential philosopher, and its method of experience provides a basis for many ethical principles. Although the expressive nature of Hume and the complexity of intellectual thinking are incredible to most readers, the importance of justice is considered important and even today's society has many values ​​and ethics . It is related. The discussion of Hume's moral virtue in his book "Exploring the Moral Principle" explains the importance of justice that is related to further examples of moral evidence and moral differences . (I) The precondition for the distribution of justice is a condition that must be met in consideration of the distribution of justice. David Hume's "situation of justice" is an example. Most modern theorists agree with Hume's view that the problem of distribution justice arises only when the substance is relatively short of (to the resources that people need). It is not wealthy, extremely poor). Under such circumstances, there are contradictions of identity and contradictions between individuals, so we need to seek necessary and potentially fair resolutions of the principles necessary for assertion of contradiction. As suggested above, the interpretation as a competing argument that balances with distributable justice-assignable ones reflects the approval of the idea that distributed justice emerges only when justice is obtained ing. I have direct responsibility for this. In his judicial affairs, David Hume places great emphasis on the distribution of social property. Hume believes that only the concept of property can give social justice and other social virtues. According to Hume, justice is an important social virtue whose sole purpose is public works. In order to show his view on how property distribution defines social justice, David Hume cited several examples. Utopia Society as an example David Hume (1711-1776) is a Scottish philosopher and economist. He tried to apply scientific methods, especially from a knowledge perspective, to the exploration of the essence of human beings. Rawls said Hume called justice as "cautious and unwieldy virtue". He refers to Hume's book "Theory of Humanity" (1739) and "Exploring the Moral Principle" (1751). Rolls discussed his own view on the situation of justice based on Hume. He further stated that Hume could determine the terms of the justice society when discussing the concept of reasonable and fair sympathy for the audience.

In 1748, David Hume wrote "Discussion on Human Understanding" in Enlightenment and on the eve of Industry and Science Revolution. Therefore, some of the ideas used and comparisons are only outdated, but even if there is science, they contribute to his argument about causality. Hume 's biggest concern is the origin of causality, how to acquire knowledge from causality, and whether it can even call the knowledge in causality a real knowledge. I read the human understanding survey (1748) by David Hume at the university. I am not satisfied with this, this is not voluntary. The only purpose I started writing this book was to loot these interesting things for reference and citation. As books often occur - I reluctantly learned something. According to Mr. Dave, the impression is "vibrant vivid perception". They are instantaneous, unruly, and tweets of information are always integrated into our conscious and unconscious minds. For example, red is the impression. The same can be said about anger. The bell rang. warm. Itches it. Darkness ... Because we can not control what we feel, we can not control what we "impress". The impression is that we hear, see, feel, love, hate, desire, or hope will happen. They are primitive and instinctive and can be thought of as "atoms" of the thought process. Minimum particle to sum up to create - David Hume (1711-1776) is a Scottish philosopher and economist. He tried to apply scientific methods, especially from a knowledge perspective, to the exploration of the essence of human beings. Rawls said Hume called justice as "cautious and unwieldy virtue". He refers to Hume's book "Theory of Humanity" (1739) and "Exploring the Moral Principle" (1751). Rolls discussed his own view on the situation of justice based on Hume. He further stated that Hume could determine the terms of the justice society when discussing the concept of reasonable and fair sympathy for the audience. In 1748, David Hume wrote "Discussion on Human Understanding" in Enlightenment and on the eve of Industry and Science Revolution. Therefore, some of the ideas used and comparisons are only outdated, but even if there is science, they contribute to his argument about causality. Hume 's biggest concern is the origin of causality, how to acquire knowledge from causality, and whether it can even call the knowledge in causality a real knowledge.

Practicalism, empiricism, and practicalism of David Hume are based on the philosophy that experience has to test and retest the idea and experience determines the reality. The practitioner also does not believe in the existence of absolute truths and values. David Hume said: "We can not draw evidence from the fact that we are very carefully watching, if we doubt, we can not be convinced" ("Theory" 2645). Hume's empiricist ideal is the root of early pragmatism and in our reality there is nothing to be confirmed and everything perceptible must always be qualified to find a place of reality . Hume's epistemology David Hume is a Scottish philosopher known for his skepticism and empiricism. Hume strives to develop John Rock 's empiricism better through scientific research on our humanity. If we do not clarify this problem, we can not rely on common sense to explain human behavior. In other words, Hume said that it is urgent to observe how humans do this because humans are actually living and working in this world. The main John Locke, Berkeley, Hume are both empiricist philosophers. They all have different opinions, but I agree with three anchor points; the only source of true knowledge is sensual experience, unreliable unless it is based on a strong foundation of sensual experience It is inappropriate knowledge route. There is no evidence that natural thoughts in mind are learned from experience. Every philosopher has developed some of the most attractive concepts. David Hume Hume, David, 1711-76, Scottish philosopher, and historian. Hume brings empiricalism of John Rock and George Berkeley to the logical extremes of fundamental skepticism. He denied the possibility of certain kinds of knowledge and found a series of emotions in his mind and believed that the causal relationship in nature was entirely from B's introduction. The answer to the theme is drawn by the time committee named as illusion by David Hume, and the time committee named human by himself. In the era of modern philosophy, when the influence of Descartes was still important, David Hume brought the argument of killing the Descartes I created and skipping it like a ghost in human perception. You can see not only the theme but also the contrast between Hume and Descartes.

Hume: Bad practices and virtue philosophy are studies of general and basic problems such as existence, reality, knowledge, values, human thoughts, and questions about languages. "Therefore, I am a famous quotation that attempts to define this study very easily, and the philosophers quoted are the widely considered fathers of modern philosophy, the 17th century French Renée Descartes ". David Hume is a Scottish of the 18th century and is considered by many to be the most important British philosopher in history. In his work "Humanity theory", David Hume divides virtues into two categories, artificial virtue and natural virtue. Hume pointed out that courage is a natural virtue in paper. Among the paper's "pride and humility, its purpose and cause", Hume clearly shows that courage is the cause of pride. Witness, goodwill, learning, courage, justice, honesty, all these are the reasons for pride, and the opposite of their humility. Hume discussed a wide catalog of special virtues and vices. His story in "thesis" is based on the distinction between "natural" virtue and "human" virtue, which can easily be misunderstood. The question is not whether some virtues are fake or imitation, and whether other virtues are genuine or not. The problem is whether some people rely on social rules and customs, but others do not. Organizing his catalog by this distinction deals with people who believe that Hume emerges from people who think morality as a complete tradition (eg Bernard Mandeville) and social customs that it is independent of social customs Francis Hutcheson) According to Hume's view, some virtues depend on social customs, but others are not (Cohon 2008: 162-163). In both cases, he is trying to explain why people tend to develop these characteristics, and why they tend to pick sensible spectators.

In the "Survey on Understanding of Human", David Hume shows how to reasonably present the reasons for future events. According to historical experience, Hume 's factual understanding. Based on this theoretical basis, Hume continues to prove that as a human being, we can only infer about what will happen to the future based on past experience. But he pointed out that we believe that using past experiences to prove what will happen in the future is reasonable and that we are wrong. David Hume always answered negatively when asked if reasonably believed that other people 's testimony miraculously happened. This article will discuss why Hume believes that it is unreasonable to believe that the miracle will occur based on the testimony of others. Then I will discuss and support the use of circumstances surrounding testimony and testimony to believe in miracle reasons. "Miracles are to violate the laws of nature and the evidence of miracles is as complete as the arguments in experience, due to the firm and unchanging experience of the enactment of these laws from the nature of the facts. "(710) Since the reliability of the natural law and the reliability of the human testimony are neither an ideology relationship nor a 100% affirmation, Hume believes that it is unreasonable to believe that a miracle will occur based on the testimony of others I am in Scottish philosopher David Hume of the 18th century considered these problems very carefully. He defined the miracle as "a violation of the law of nature". But it is important to understand what these "laws" are and where they came from. They must be understood as a "solid and unchangeable experience" based on past and present unity. Therefore, they are the best "proof of a miracle". Therefore, Hume wrote in "Survey on Human Understanding" (1748). "There is not enough evidence to prove a miracle unless the testimony is such an obvious result (and this is the general maxim that deserves our attention)." In good faith, that lie seems more magical than the fact that it seeks to establish; even in this case, the discussion is mutually destructive, and the boss guarantees that level of power after subtracting disadvantage to us It only gives.

David Hume and his idea began his view by observing "various preferences and opinions spreading to the world". This diversity is seen by people with the same background and culture of the same group and becomes more prominent in "from the countryside and the distant age". "Standard of taste" provides a clear way to harmonize this diversity. According to taste, Hume refers to the impression and emotional reactions associated with beauty and ugliness. His idea with David Hume began his opinion, and they observed that "there are all kinds of preferences and opinions in the world." This diversity is found among people of the same group with the same background and culture. It is more evident in "distant country and distant age". "Standard of taste" provides a clear way to harmonize this diversity. According to hobbies, Hume refers to the impression or emotional response associated with the first part of Part 8 of the "Human Understanding Study". He suggests that he must stem from his false assumption that he defends his position and that any discussion against his point of view can essentially perceive necessary connections. Hume's position is related to his general view of causation. David Hume, the early philosopher of Scottish Enlightenment, met Adam Smith in 1750, and Hume had a great influence on the construction of Smith's economic theory. Hume does not believe in causality - at least he is skeptical as to whether you can "see" the cause of the microscope - Smith also calls the economy of an important invisible element he calls "invisible" A hand to avoid a mystery. "It's not the kindness of a butcher, a winemaker, a bakery, we are looking forward to dinner, but they are interested in their own interests," Smith wrote. "We are not for their own human nature but for ourselves to solve ourselves for their self-love, we never talked about their necessity, but on their advantages. As we understand today, it is not entirely "free market economics". Myth is not clear yet

Where did the religion come from? Many people try to answer this question, but there are more questions than answers. This article will focus on the strong criticism of God's existence by two philosophers David Hume and Karl Marx. Both are in violation of the design theory and the design theory is a rationale for the existence of God or one creator; but in Hume's experientist and Marx atheist they attack the design theory in different ways, Eventually I draw the same conclusion. It is not a god. Karl Marx developed criticism of capitalism in capitalism by analyzing its characteristics and development throughout history. Criticism involves Markus' most developed economic analysis and philosophical insight. It was written in the 1950s, but its value still plays an important role in the globalized world and remains very important in the 21st century. Criticism of Karl Marx 's political economy provides a scientific understanding of the history of capitalism. Karl Marx is one of the most controversial figures in human history. Marx has built the foundation of the darkest era in Eastern European history and has written several books on philosophical themes known as "communism". The life of Marx, the philosophy of Marx, and the philosophy seen through the Bible are very important for Christians to understand the ideology of communism. Where did the religion come from? Many people try to answer this question, but there are more questions than answers. This article will focus on the strong criticism of God's existence by two philosophers David Hume and Karl Marx. - Religion is a common theme connecting people of all races and backgrounds. It gives people meaning and brings hope to desperate people. Religion transcends culture and time, raised people who choose to believe in higher power and take life in the hands of holy ones. Although all religious practices and ways of worship are different. Religion has a major purpose of leading people to pursue a moral and courageous life. Various views on various religious beliefs on the planet and famous religious studies. I chose Karl Marx and Max Weber to work on the paper. Two sociologists and philosophers discussed their views on religion and its impact on society. Most sociologists of the time write about the role of religion in society, and observations of Karl Marx and Max Weber were particularly relevant to our curriculum. Religion is one of the major social ideologies of influence. Max Weber, Karl Marx, Emil Durchem In general, religion is one of the social-oriented theories and has some influence on the social stability of society. This is because religion is the driving force of social supervision and unstable dynamics of change. Max Weber, Karl Marx and Emile Durchem were still very influential people in the 19th century.

David Hume - Response to early criticism of naturalistic meta ethics, political science and psychology David Hume. Based on Houston's "Last Conference" at the bar at Princes Street in Edinburgh, I suggest that Kant and Moore are loyal to the intuitive and cautious basic concept of the traditional ethical ban did. I called this interpretation of Hume's compatibility strategy "naturalism". In what sense is Hume's claim "naturalistic"? I think there are two very different "naturalistic" feelings that can be applied appropriately to the discussion of Hume on freedom and necessity. The first and most important meaning is that it involves applying the experimental reasoning method to this "controversial problem". As we have seen, Hume is interested in explaining the circumstances in which people are responsible (ie explaining the "traditional mechanisms" that create moral sentiments). Thus, Hume's compatibility strategy must be understood in the general context of his efforts to introduce "a method of experimental reasoning for moral subjects". In this article we will focus on two alternative interpretations of Hume's compatibility strategy, the "classical" interpretation and the "naturalistic" interpretation, for a basic comparison. According to the classics, efforts to express the relationship between Hume's moral responsibility requirements and free will will be understood primarily from his view on the conceptual logic of "freedom" and "necessity" You should. . It is said that free and responsible behavior must be triggered by the agent. Therefore, there is no incompatibility between free will and determinism. On the contrary, free and responsible behavior (logically) requires a causal relationship. As so described, Hume's discussion involves (a priori) observations about the logical relationship between the important concepts involved in this controversy. In other words, one of the main goals of Hume is to explain what people are responsible for.

David Hume's article "Taste Standards" is one of the most respected works of so-called aesthetics. He is known for other works such as "humanity", "exploring human understanding", "exploring moral principles", but they all have limited nature of the role in human life is showing. This subjective viewpoint also appears in "standard of taste". Aesthetic judgment is based on personal feelings rather than personal reasons. In the prospect of David Hume's prose, the Qur'an is described as "absurd appearance" of "pretending prophets" and lacks "fair morality". He said that he participated in the story, "We quickly discover that such treachery, inhumanity, cruelty, revenge, prejudice, etc. are not fully compatible with civil society and are admired As long as it is good or harmful for a true believer, pay attention to every action that is condemned or admired. " David Hume's article "Taste Standards" solves the problem of how to determine objects. Hume solved three hypotheses on how to determine the aesthetic value. These assumptions are as follows. All preferences are equal, one art is better than the other art, the aesthetic value of art is defined by human preference (from the lecture). However, Hume discovered that these three beliefs are hypothetical "contradictory triples" (from the lecture). If all the tastes are the same, and the taste determines the aesthetic value, some art is good, what is wrong? The paper on the famous "taste standard" by David Hume suggests and discusses epistemological problems raised by subjectivity in aesthetics. If beauty is our idea and not a feature unrelated to our purpose, how do we understand the possibilities of correctness and inaccuracy in this field? This problem is more obvious to Hume as he is strengthening Hutchison's subjectivity. "Happiness and pain ... not only the waiters necessary for beauty and malformation, but also their essence" ("Thesis", Part 2, Part 1, Part 8). But, if you are expressing whether taste judgment is based on subjective feelings, how is it likely to be wrong?

In this article we will discuss the discussion on human understanding by David Hume (1711-1776), Section X, discussion on miracles, and whether it is reasonable to assume the existence of a miracle. I will first discuss why the existence of miracles is important and how miracles are related to understanding the laws of nature. Next, I will see how Hume believes that believing miracles is unreasonable. Then I will dispute this argument. I believe that not only is reasonable but also a necessary condition for a loyal life. Scottish philosopher David Hume of the 18th century considered these problems very carefully. He defined the miracle as "a violation of the law of nature". But it is important to understand what these "laws" are and where they came from. They must be understood as a "solid and unchangeable experience" based on past and present unity. Therefore, they are the best "proof of a miracle". Therefore, Hume wrote in "Survey on Human Understanding" (1748). "There is not enough evidence to prove a miracle unless the testimony is such an obvious result (and this is the general maxim that deserves our attention)." . In good faith, that lie seems more magical than the fact that it seeks to establish; even in this case the discussion is mutually destructive, and the boss guarantees that level of power after subtracting disadvantage to us It only gives. David Hume always answered negatively when asked if reasonably believed that other people 's testimony miraculously happened. This article will discuss why Hume believes that it is unreasonable to believe that the miracle will occur based on the testimony of others. Then I will discuss and support the use of circumstances surrounding testimony and testimony to believe in miracle reasons. "Miracles are to violate the laws of nature and the evidence of miracles is as complete as the arguments in experience, due to the firm and unchanging experience of the enactment of these laws from the nature of the facts. "(710) Since the reliability of the natural law and the reliability of the human testimony are neither an ideology relationship nor a 100% affirmation, Hume believes that it is unreasonable to believe that a miracle will occur based on the testimony of others I am in

When comparing David Hume and Emanuel Kant, David Hume and Emanuel Kant can make a big progress with each other theorists, suggest morals that do not need higher existence and God, and can recognize him. Moral responsibility Hume and Kant share some basic principles, but they have different views on morality. Comparing the different perspectives of one's will and the sayings established by the moral values ​​of David Hume and Emanuel Kant show that although their moral theory is limited, there are still some advantages It was. The ethics of Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) are in stark contrast to the ethics of David Hume (1711-1776). Hume's moral philosophical approach is experimental and empirical; Kant emphasizes the need to establish a moral foundation in transcendentalism. Hume said that the reason is just "slave of passion", while Kant establishes morality with the concept of his own concept. Hume considers the feelings of kindness and generosity as a correct moral motive and Kant saw the motive of responsibility - Hume usually regards it as the motive of second best or recession, thus giving a devotion to morality that gives special morality Uniquely represent. Value is conveyed to action. Although the moral views of Kant and Hume are hostile to each other in many ways, there is also an important relationship between them. When comparing David Hume and Emanuel Kant, David Hume and Emanuel Kant can make a big progress with each other theorists, suggest morals that do not need higher existence and God, and can recognize him. Moral responsibility Hume and Kant share some basic principles, but they have different views on morality. I found some moral theory by comparing the different opinions of human will to determine moral value and the sayings established by David Hume and Immanuel Kant.

For the moral sentiment in Appendix I, David Hume wants to find moral reasons and emotions. Through five principles he finally reached the conclusion that reason is not positioned in the moral concept but only helps emotions about moral issues. The reason can be true or false, but these truths or lies apply to facts, not morals. Then he thinks morality is a direct result of emotion, or feeling of inner feeling of human beings. Moral indifference is a complete lack of moral sentiment or silence. Without these moral feelings and emotions, our moral system can not exist. David Hume (1724-1776) insists that rationality can not be the basis of our moral system. Hume pointed out that this does not infringe rationality, but tends to hurt the world's fingers. He also acknowledged that choosing to completely destroy himself does not violate rationality. So what is it that disturbs morally? Our moral feelings and emotions. Hume insists that the reason should be a slave of feelings, but I believe that this effect is mutual. We need to shape our moral feelings through rationality and our rationality needs to be alleviated by our moral sentiment. Philosopher David Hume is a pioneer of this view. Hume does not regard morality as a rational company. He thinks the reason is dominated by emotion. Of course, our moral decisions are summarized and presented for reasons, but for Hume these reasons are objective, but they are not only guided by specific emotions, they are sometimes brought about by them. If morality is how we deal with each other, why so many ancient texts put too much space in the rules of menstruation? Explain that these laws are neither rational nor health related. (Why are you Kosher, are not most Grasshoppers?) It seems to me that disgust is the principle of more promising interpretation.

Hume's epistemology David Hume is a Scottish philosopher known for his skepticism and empiricism. Hume strives to develop John Rock 's empiricism better through scientific research on our humanity. If we do not clarify this problem, we can not rely on common sense to explain human behavior. In other words, Hume said that it is urgent to observe how humans do this because humans are actually living and working in this world. The main purpose of philosophy is to explain and justify why we believe what we are doing. The philosophy of Immanual Kant (1724-1804), the most influential philosopher since Aristotle, is an attempt to answer the skeptical philosophy of David Hume (1711-1776). According to Hume there is no reason to believe the causal relationship; for example, just because an object seems to have a law of gravity that always causes objects of the past to fall to the ground, the object will not change at such next gravity law There is no reason to believe it to follow. Kant agreed that Hume agreed that he could not understand how something behaves in the real world or the real world. But Kant adds new wrinkles. He thinks that each person's mind builds up a subjective world and that this subjective world is the world that each of us "knows". Head David Hume devoted himself to part of his philosophy and tried to ignore his mistaken argument about the soul. In Hume's doubt, the German idealist began with Emmanuel Kant and left various cognitive and metaphysical problems. David Hume is an Scottish empiricist and became a philosopher for his metaphysical skepticism and explanation of his mind. Hume was born in the 18th century The opposite of causal reductionism and causal skepticism is a new tradition of rest. It began with Norman Kemp Smith's "David Hume's Philosophy" and defended Hume as a causal realist's viewpoint. In this way we deny the causality reduction theory and causality skepticism. - Causal relationships are known in principle. (Tooley 1987: 246-47) Considering the above explanation, Humean's causal realism is least intuitive, so it needs the most explanation. However, this position can be made more reasonable by introducing three explanatory tools that seem to require proper use to persuade the realistic interpretation. Two of them argue that Hume is respected in important respects, but it is a description of a realist who claims that unrealistic interpretation is often denied.

David Hume explains how you can not predict the future with a human understanding survey. Our experience and inference tells us that the object is functioning in a predictable way but we can not prove how the object is based on future previous interactions. After biting pizza we are looking forward to a pleasant taste. As our past experiences have proved this, this pleasant taste is predictable. Even though we think that the behavior of a pizza can be predicted to be the same as previous experience, it may only explode when chewing. David Hume Hume, David, 1711-76, Scottish philosopher, and historian. Hume brings empiricalism of John Rock and George Berkeley to the logical extremes of fundamental skepticism. He denied the possibility of certain kinds of knowledge and found a series of emotions in his mind and believed that the causal relationship in nature was entirely from B's introduction. The answer to the theme is drawn by the time committee named as illusion by David Hume, and the time committee named human by himself. In the era of modern philosophy, when the influence of Descartes was still important, David Hume brought the argument of killing the Descartes I created and skipping it like a ghost in human perception. You can see not only the theme but also the contrast between Hume and Descartes. David Hume raised doubts about the world's knowledge with the option of "skeptical of understanding behavior." This problem is related to induction problems. David Hume was one of the first people to decide to analyze this problem. He begins to choose by providing a form of segmentation of human knowledge and then discusses its dependence on reasoning and experience. According to Mr. Hume, people believe that the future will be similar to the past, but there is no evidence to support this belief. In this article, we will clarify the form of knowledge and inference and verify inductive problems of Hume. This is a challenge to the explanation of legitimate faith because there is no reason for belief.

Suicide analysis of David Hume "I do not think anyone will abandon their lives, but it is worth continuing." In a paper by David Hume "suicide" he pursued a philosophical argument about reasonable suicide. However, the underlying argument focuses on inappropriate evidence of the government and society, which condemns and prohibits such behavior, the creation of religion, and superstition and lies of God. Hume is the final stage that people experience before taking life is "disorder, weakness, ignorance, stupidity", these features are evident in their heads, for his own decision I believe I will kill him. David Hume left a paper on suicide after his death. Most of them are about suicide as an insult to God. Hume believes that suicide is no longer a rebellion against God, it is not the life of a person who dead or changes the position of something around a person otherwise. He reduces the time it takes to argue that this is an insult to others or to others' responsibility for themselves. Hume argues that suicide is compared with retirement from society and it is claimed to be a complete hermit, but this comparison does not seem to prove that children and families after suicide become vulnerable. Regarding his liability, he thinks that everyone thinks suicide is stupid unless they first consider other options, but he sometimes reveals that suicide is desirable. Suicide analysis of David Hume "I do not think anyone will abandon their lives, but it is worth continuing." In a paper by David Hume "suicide" he pursued a philosophical argument about reasonable suicide. However, the underlying argument focuses on inappropriate evidence of the government and society, which condemns and prohibits such behavior, the creation of religion, and superstition and lies of God. Hume thinks that it is the final stage of the person's experience before observing observation. David Hume's induction problem. According to Hume, this reasoning method is logically effective. Logically reasonable reasoning indicates that if the premise is true, the conclusion must be true. Better still, if you accept this premise, you must accept that conclusion. There is no way to realize this place, and the conclusion is wrong. However, this is not the case as the use of a priori reasoning does not prove logically correct inductive reasoning.

David Hume's "miracle" in David Hume's paper? It is a miracle. Hume has advocated various arguments about why people should not trust any miracle. Hume does not believe that miracles do not exist, but do not believe it because there is no reasonable background. One of his arguments, by definition, miracle is incredible. And there is no reasonable way to believe in miracles. Another argument is that most miracles are often from undeveloped countries and witnesses often create conflicts of interest and oppose each other's experiences. Miraculous memory David Hume's "fairness about human understanding" is obvious, and he believes that no miracles will occur. Hume is a logical person who believes in knowledge experience. Of course, such people do not witness them, it is difficult to believe in extraordinary ideas. Especially when these events require a lot of faith. In order for the incident to be regarded as a miracle, it must violate the laws of nature. But, that is the same legal chief. David Hume devoted himself to part of his philosophy and tried to ignore his wrong assertion about the soul. In Hume's doubt, the German idealist began with Emmanuel Kant and left various cognitive and metaphysical problems. David Hume is an Scottish empiricist and became a philosopher for his metaphysical skepticism and explanation of his mind. Hume was born in the 18th century David Hume's "miracle" in David Hume's paper? miracle,? Hume has advocated various arguments about why people should not trust any miracle. Hume does not believe that miracles do not exist, but do not believe it because there is no reasonable background. One of his arguments, by definition, miracle is incredible. And there is no reasonable way to believe in miracles. Another argument is that most miracles often come from non-civilized interpretation or define miracles; miracles are violations of natural laws that are unusual for most people. When Hume said: "Nothing is considered a miracle, if it happened in a common process of nature, then he will explain this very clearly. A man that looks healthy will suddenly die It is not a miracle. "Hume, p. 888) Hume said that this death is abnormal, but it seems to happen naturally.

Hume began to be skeptical about the operation of understanding. He said that there are two types of human understanding (only one of which contains a real or definitive investigation he knows about us). Mr. Hume said that all human reasoning skills can be divided into two types: ideological relations and fact issues. Intellectual relationship is the knowledge of science and mathematics. They are essential and can be proved without experience like Pythagorean theorem. I just thought that talking about the cause of faith and the influence of faith is different from talking about faith for Hume. But is this correct? Let's first consider the problem of influence. Does Hume likely incorporate the influence of faith into its definition? According to this objection, perfect and clear recognition is not necessarily a belief, but only a vivid awareness that has had some influence is a belief. However, it seems that Hume did not. For example, in the "Influence of Faith" section, Hume said, "It will lead to the idea of ​​imitating the impact of the impression, so we need to resemble them within these qualities, and a strong concept" ( T 119-20). Even if he said that his belief would have an impact, Hume said that "I am just" a vivid concept. When discussing the interpretation of the causal relationship of Hume, its effect is explained in this relation. Hume explains the causal relationship in causality such as thinking, necessity, skepticism and so on. These three points explain the peak of Hume's causal theory. When discussing ideas, we must consider the fact that ideas range from the challenge of death to inspiration. For example, when Hume discussed ideology, he referred to the golden mountain. "When we think of golden mountains, we will combine only two unanimous ideas, gold and mountain, all of our thoughts or weak ideas are our impressions or a more vivid impression." As long as there is an idea there is a complex thought process reflecting whether the idea is beneficial or insignificant. What are these ideas yet "What if?" Usually comes from the causal relationship of specific ideas. What if he was arrested?

Hume began to be skeptical about the operation of understanding. He said that there are two types of human understanding (only one of which contains a real or definitive investigation he knows about us). Mr. Hume said that all human reasoning skills can be divided into two types: ideological relations and fact issues. Intellectual relationship is the knowledge of science and mathematics. They are essential and can be proved without experience like Pythagorean theorem. I just thought that talking about the cause of faith and the influence of faith is different from talking about faith for Hume. But is this correct? Let's first consider the problem of influence. Does Hume likely incorporate the influence of faith into its definition? According to this objection, perfect and clear recognition is not necessarily a belief, but only a vivid awareness that has had some influence is a belief. However, it seems that Hume did not. For example, in the "Influence of Faith" section, Hume said, "It will lead to the idea of ​​imitating the impact of the impression, so we need to resemble them within these qualities, and a strong concept" ( T 119-20). Even if he said that his belief would have an impact, Hume said that "I am just" a vivid concept. When discussing the interpretation of the causal relationship of Hume, its effect is explained in this relation. Hume explains the causal relationship in causality such as thinking, necessity, skepticism and so on. These three points explain the peak of Hume's causal theory. When discussing ideas, we must consider the fact that ideas range from the challenge of death to inspiration. For example, when Hume discussed ideology, he referred to the golden mountain. "When we think of golden mountains, we will combine only two unanimous ideas, gold and mountain, all of our thoughts or weak ideas are our impressions or a more vivid impression." As long as there is an idea there is a complex thought process reflecting whether the idea is beneficial or insignificant. What are these ideas yet "What if?" Usually comes from the causal relationship of specific ideas. What if he was arrested?

"The human brain starts working from the moment you were born until you stand up and speak in public." - (George Jessier) People try to elucidate the brain and what is going on inside This is what the philosopher is trying to achieve today, but you can ask a question. Why do I have to dissect the brain? This problem occurs because the philosopher really wants to know what is happening in the human brain. This can also be traced back to "knowing" and believing what can be proved fact. The philosophy of Immanual Kant (1724-1804), the most influential philosopher since Aristotle, is an attempt to answer the skeptical philosophy of David Hume (1711-1776). According to Hume there is no reason to believe the causal relationship; for example, just because an object seems to have a law of gravity that always causes objects of the past to fall to the ground, the object will not change at such next gravity law There is no reason to believe it to follow. Kant agreed that Hume agreed that he could not understand how something behaves in the real world or the real world. But Kant adds new wrinkles. He thinks that each person's mind builds up a subjective world and that this subjective world is the world that each of us "knows". The opposite of causal reductionism and causal skepticism is a new tradition of rest. It began with Norman Kemp Smith's "David Hume's Philosophy" and defended Hume as a causal realist's viewpoint. In this way we deny the causality reduction theory and causality skepticism. - Causal relationships are known in principle. (Tooley 1987: 246-47) Considering the above explanation, Humean's causal realism is least intuitive, so it needs the most explanation. However, this position can be made more reasonable by introducing three explanatory tools that seem to require proper use to persuade the realistic interpretation. Two of them argue that Hume is respected in important respects, but it is a description of a realist who claims that unrealistic interpretation is often denied.

Before mentioning Hume's philosophy, the easiest way to explain the concept of empiricism seems to be the most appropriate. Before Immanuel Conde conquered transcendental idealism, the school of epistemological thought was divided into rationalism and the above empiricism. The former thinks that knowledge is congenital and logic and reason is the main way to acquire knowledge. Instead, experientists believe that knowledge is based on senses and experiences; in essence, humans are whiteboards. In his work "Humanity theory", David Hume divides virtues into two categories, artificial virtue and natural virtue. Hume pointed out that courage is a natural virtue in paper. Among the paper's "pride and humility, its purpose and cause", Hume clearly shows that courage is the cause of pride. Witness, goodwill, learning, courage, justice, honesty, all these are the reasons for pride, and the opposite of their humility. In the introduction of "humanity", Mr. Hume states as follows. "It is clear that all sciences are more or less related to human nature," he says, "Human science is also" the only solid foundation of other science ", and a logical discussion on the scientific approach Said that the experience and observation as a foundation of it is necessary. In this aspect of Hume's thinking, the philosophical historian Frederic Coptstone says that the purpose of Hume is to apply human science to the method of experimental philosophy (which means the term of natural philosophy), and " "It is a methodological extension to extend the summary to Newtonian physics." David Hume stated that Bacon is famous for introducing human essays. He acknowledged that "late British philosophers" including Rock, Shaftesbury, Mandeville, Hutchison and Butler began to make human science a new foothold. (Hume 1978: xvii). As Bacon once advocated "rebuilding" science, Hume urged the necessity of "reform" in "human science"; this issue may be "more important" than in natural philosophy ( Hume 1978: xvii). Indeed, Hume further stepped forward, suggesting that "human science is the only solid foundation of other sciences", including mathematics, natural philosophy and natural religion, the former suggests that human science dependent on other sciences I am researching. (Hume 1978: xvi)

Locke, Berkeley, Hume's Enlightenment began with unmatched confidence for human reasons. The success of the new science through the elimination of the natural world of Locke, Berkeley, Hume influenced philosophical efforts in two ways. The first is to place the foundation of human knowledge in the human mind and put it in encounter with the physical world. The second is to direct the attention of philosophy to an analysis of the mind that can achieve cognitive success. John Rock set a tone of enlightenment by affirming the basic principle of empiricism: nothing in intelligence was in the past. Empiricism, a belief in the realization of knowledge through sensation, is the universal belief of several great contemporary philosophers. Perhaps the most famous empiricists are John Locke, George Berkeley and David Hume who are considered to be one of the most influential philosophers in the past 500 years. Due to the importance of experience in philosophical principles, each philosopher can be regarded as an experientist. More specifically, the empirical perspective of rock can be seen from his view on the primary and secondary nature of objects. David Hume Hume, David, 1711-76, Scottish philosopher, and historian. Hume brings empiricalism of John Rock and George Berkeley to the logical extremes of fundamental skepticism. He denied the possibility of certain kinds of knowledge and found a series of emotions in his mind and believed that the causal relationship in nature was entirely from B's introduction. The answer to the theme is drawn by the time committee named as illusion by David Hume, and the time committee named human by himself. In the era of modern philosophy, when the influence of Descartes was still important, David Hume brought the argument of killing the Descartes I created and skipping it like a ghost in human perception. You can see not only the theme but also the contrast between Hume and Descartes. Among the important philosophers related to empiricism are Aristotle, Thomas Aquinas, Francis Bacon, Thomas Hobbes, John Rock, George Berkeley, David Hume, and John Stuart Mill. Recently, positivists such as Mach, Vienna Circle, logical positivists, and most followers of analysis philosophy are empiricists. The central concept of scientific and scientific methods is that all evidence must be based on observable evidence by sensory or sensory extension empirically or empirically. It is distinguished from philosophical usage of empirical philosophy by using adjective "experience" or adverb "experience". Experience refers to the use of working assumptions used in combination with natural science and social science and can be tested or experimentally tested. In this sense, the scientific statement is the subject of our experience and observation and is derived from them.

Metaphysics in the rehabilitation of Kant and Hume, Kant read David Hume, he said, "I made him awake from his dogmatic sleep.Life problems and prejudice This furthermore Kant is his own metaphysics I urged Hume to reply in the analysis of the theory Kant does not think that Hume can cope with these problems appropriately, in particular to solve the problem of whether Hume is feasible as science Decide to avoid places where Hume is located. After the break, the philosopher Emmanuel Conde started reforming metaphysics. Kant believes that metaphysics is impossible if Hume is right. However, Kant did not want to give way to Hume 's skepticism, so Kant began to criticize the possibility to explore and reform metaphysics. Kant began to criticize the quest for 'transcendental' knowledge in philosophy. Kant began looking for the "transcendental" principle that can reasonably be inferred to explain why he thinks it can not be detected. Kant believes that the only way we can get the necessary and universal thing is through 'a priori'. Kant found that the notion of causality is not the only concept to understand things 'a priori' but the metaphysics confirmed to consist completely of these concepts. (8) "Prolegomena", Kant said he had read David Hume, "let him awake from an arbitrary sleep." This is a study of Hum's human understanding, which allows Kant to recognize the problems and prejudices of life that he had not previously realized. It further encouraged Kant to answer Hume in his own analysis of metaphysical theory. Kant does not believe that Hume can cope with these problems appropriately, and decides to avoid the place where Hume is located, in particular to solve the problem of whether Hume is possible as science . Kant answered Hume's question directly in metaphysical analysis. Hume stopped thinking and was skeptical of the existence of metaphysics as science, and Kant accepted it. He continues to analyze the effectiveness of metaphysics as science and power in our lives. Talking about other people who can trust in the field of science, such as Copernicus, Kant developed a new way to observe the world. But like Hume, Kant encountered obstacles and could not find a solution.

The way the concept exists in your mind is a concept worth studying on its own. Many philosophers look for the origin of ideas in the human mind, and are showing various reasons. As a philosopher, Hume proposed that his own framework of human thought is appropriate. For Hume, the development of perception is either an understanding of the outside world, or recall of these events or a change in their memory. Survey on Human Understanding David Hume, Hume's claims will outline the conclusions about the future based on past experiences limited to possible assumptions. Assumption "Hume 21" through Hume 21, Hume means the ability of things like buns of lump, "supporting the human body" (Hume 21) I read the human understanding survey (1748) by David Hume at the university. I am not satisfied with this, this is not voluntary. The only purpose I started writing this book was to loot these interesting things for reference and citation. As books often occur - I reluctantly learned something. According to Mr. Dave, the impression is "vibrant vivid perception". They are instantaneous, unruly, and tweets of information are always integrated into our conscious and unconscious minds. For example, red is the impression. The same can be said about anger. The bell rang. warm. Itches it. Darkness ... Because we can not control what we feel, we can not control what we "impress". The impression is that we hear, see, feel, love, hate, desire, or hope will happen. They are primitive and instinctive and can be thought of as "atoms" of the thought process. Minimum particle to sum up to create -

I think that Hume's morals can be described as virtue ethics I am referring to the idea that which role will take precedence over action and action principles: practical with gentle role guidance and constraints Discussion. In traditional utilitarianism and Kant Ethics, personality is subject to actual deliberation. Only virtue is necessary to motivate benign behavior. I first outlined this approach with Aristotle's ethics and compared it with Hume. I think that the good character of Aristotle is understood as "self love". True self enthusiasts are most interested in using characteristics of judgment, selection, judgment, and removal. Hume studied moral judgment and started looking for meaning of moral terms. Hume does not find observable facts and logical relationships that answer the concepts of good, justice, moral virtue, but the function of moral terms is not to express quality or relationship but "recognized emotions" . I do not have any emotions in my judgment. The reason we call it good is the same as what we call beauty. If that object is comfortable immediately, or if it is a useful means to obtain other pleasant items, that object is good. Virtue is a "natural virtue" such as talent, wisdom, kindness, whether it is "human virtue" such as honesty or justice, makes a person happy or useful to himself or to others It is quality to be. In his work "Humanity theory", David Hume divides virtues into two categories, artificial virtue and natural virtue. Hume pointed out that courage is a natural virtue in paper. Among the paper's "pride and humility, its purpose and cause", Hume clearly shows that courage is the cause of pride. Witness, goodwill, learning, courage, justice, honesty, all these are the reasons for pride, and the opposite of their humility. In his argument about natural virtues, Hume 's debt to Greek ethics can be seen more clearly. Among them, the important group (consisting of courage, generosity, ambition, etc.) is based on self esteem and may even be a kind of self-esteem: "We call it a heroic virtue, it's great Praise the soul under sublime character.Stability and perfection of pride and self-esteem, or main engagement to that passion ... courage ... and all other shining virtues clearly among them It is a strong self-esteem and it is derived from their origin. A big advantage "(Hume, essay, 599-600). However, these virtues based on self-esteem must be influenced by the second group including generosity, compassion, loyalty, friendship, and otherwise the courageous qualities are "tyrant and public robber It is suitable only for making "(Hume, Treatise, 603)

Even in the absence of the necessary power and discretion, like the philosophers Nietzsche, Descartes, Hume and the past, freedom confuses today's argument. There are two strong opposites to this topic. One is determinism and the other is "free will". All events, including determinism or belief that a person lacks free will, and human behavior, are determined by forces other than the will of the individual, as opposed to the premise of completely free will. Rene de Carte details his philosophical work through deductive reasoning and uses his reasoning system to complete his work. Many philosophers oppose Descartes. In all discussions about the theory proposed by Descartes, his beliefs have two major flaws. The first one is elusive "I" that questions and idealists David Hume question. Hume opposed Descartes' view that "I think I like this". Hume thinks that "I" does not exist in thinking but exists only in "a bunch of perceptions". Through this Hume, thought means that it consists only of what the mind perceives, regardless of whether it is reality or just a fantasy. Another major controversy in Descartes' philosophical thinking is that he made assumptions not proved in his meditation, only the hypothesis. In Descartes' meditation, he said that there is a God, but he can not prove it at all. Descartes circles mentioned by many philosophers are displayed like this. Descartes assumed that there is a god. Then he continued saying: David Hume's empiricalism Sanket Thakkar Oakton Community College starts with a philosopher based on his entire philosophy. Descartes rejects all premises and raises questions about congenital problems. He hid all assumptions and believed only things that could be proved. The purpose of putting everything in orderly doubt is that we do not know that it is true unless there is evidence. Descartes began to doubt his existence and started with that premise. "I am directly responsible for this, in his judicial work, David Hume put great emphasis on the distribution of social property, according to Mr. Hume, justice is an important social To prove his view on how virtue is and property distribution defines social justice, David Hume cited several examples.

Thomas Hobbes and David Hume are seeing David Hobbes in Chapter 13 of Leviathan and "Exploring the Moral Principle". The human race seen by David Hume in verse 3 gives a human perspective. Hobbes' opinion is that survival is important for our nature, but it can not explain altruism. We use various survival level theories to cover the theory of Hobbes and use the foundation of Hobbes to explain the larger behavior. Hume gave a scene that does not prove to be direct productive, but he caught selfless behavior. Scottish philosopher David Hume of the 18th century believed that people were born to be kind. It is better if the philosophical view of Thomas Hobbes (a supporter of the all inclusive government) and the pessimistic view of his personal interests is not the basis of all our actions ... We will rest. He believes that we were born with the virtue of kindness, trust, and devotion. This "voluntary order" need not be forced by a larger human resource or the theological force or institution of theology but is more efficient and orderly, individually and collectively. Thomas Hobbs, George Berkeley, and David Hume are the main representatives of empiricism and have developed complex empirical traditions as the basis of human knowledge. It was John Locke that was acknowledged as the founder of this method, he said "Papers are focused on human understanding" (1689), the only real knowledge that human thought can obtain is experience I argue that it is knowledge. The sun center model includes the free displacement of the earth to circle around the sun (not as being considered the center of the universe). Copernicus' research of the solar center model of the solar system in 1543 tried to prove that the sun is the center of the universe. The discovery of Johannes Kepler and Galileo gave theoretical credibility, and its research peaked at the "principle" of Isaac Newton, which established the laws of motion and the universal gravity that dominated the scientists. View of the physical world of the next 3rd century.

If you are a theologian, you believe evil is wrong God is powerful and you can free the world from its evil. He gave us free will, so I did not, but decided whether to follow the path of evil. If evil is thought of as a way to David to see the evil, you are God because there is evidence of evil in the world will believe that should not be there, he will drive out the evil from the world without having to suffer otherwise I guess. There was no god back then. Before you study the views on Leibniz of wicked problems, you will need to make some stage setting in order to find whether the Leibniz is what the problem is think of evil. Looking back at any of today's philosophical textbook, the problem of evil in modern philosophy is you can see that the standard regarded as atheistic discussion. Atheists believe that God can not exist because God and evil are incompatible and evil is clearly present. Some of the philosophers, but admits that incompatibility, which are claimed in the discussion of the above is too strong, still exist and exist even compatible with even the evil of God, the presence (or duration, amount, or universal,) evil We believe that we should prove to be at least Give us a convincing indirect evidence that God does not exist Taking into account the problems arising from the views on Leibniz of wicked problems, in the past few decades, they've received a sustained academic attention for obvious significance for Leibniz. Especially over the past few years - perhaps not by chance, but celebrating the 300th anniversary since Theodicy was published in 2010 - gives Levniz a number of explanatory notes on the details of dealing with evil problems and related topics To have Leibniz's attitude towards the classic evil problem is similar. The evil problem of Leibniz can be expressed as follows. If God is the best and the creator (or author) of the best universe, why is there so much pain and sin in the world? Leibniz claims that this obvious paradox is not a real problem. Leibniz created the term "theology". This means trying to harmonize the supreme and kind character of God with the evil of the world. Therefore, Theodicy of Leibniz is mainly to propose ways to solve the problem of evil. But his view on this subject can be found in many texts. (For details on the evil problem, see the article "Evil proof problem" and "Evil logic question")

Mr. Hume said that rationality alone is not enough for people to take action. He said that power to promote action is passion. Passion is the driving force of inner existence, Reason is a slave of passion. The conclusion that leads to impulsivity is caused not by rationality itself but by its guidance. Please let love, anger, fear, anxiety, jealousy act. When someone is angry, they are filled with passion. Not only that "I get angry today", but a person did not say to myself. The philosophy of Immanual Kant (1724-1804), the most influential philosopher since Aristotle, is an attempt to answer the skeptical philosophy of David Hume (1711-1776). According to Hume there is no reason to believe the causal relationship; for example, just because an object seems to have a law of gravity that always causes objects of the past to fall to the ground, the object will not change at such next gravity law There is no reason to believe it to follow. Kant agreed that Hume agreed that he could not understand how something behaves in the real world or the real world. But Kant adds new wrinkles. He thinks that each person's mind builds up a subjective world and that this subjective world is the world that each of us "knows". For the most part of this section I will explain the ethical aspects of Hum's ethics Kant, but I would like to start with a brief overview of Kant's mature moral philosophy. This is done by explaining five important functions for Kant's ethics. This helps to take this into account when dealing with Kant 's response to Hume' s ethics. Second, Kant's concept of autonomy is one of the more central, unique and influential aspects of his ethics. Kant defines autonomy as "an attribute of will" and itself is a law (it is independent from the attribute of the object of will) "(G 4: 440). According to Kant, it is autonomous because the will of the moral actor gives moral law to itself (which is self-legal) and can bind or motivate himself to comply with the law. Hume and Kant are active with two different moral values. It will help explain some of the differences between their respective moral and philosophical approaches. The most important difference is that Kant regards law, duty and obligation as the core of morality, while Hume does not. In this respect, Kant's moral concept is similar to the "moral system" of Bernard Williams, which mainly defines the moral field based on the unconditional constraints and the form of inevitable duty (Williams 1985 : 193-94). Kant believes that our moral concern is a matter of liability, which is mainly imposed on us by law with its own moral needs. Like most philosophers in the eighteenth century, he believes that our moral life is deeply involved in how we maintain benign issues in our lives

David Hume is a philosopher of imperialism who revolutionized scientific debate and methodology in a skeptical way. His argument about the way people exist today is important to explain how we learn knowledge and how to use it to explain it. Through the theory of perception of his mind Hume helped pave the way to a higher state of human consciousness. He divides thought perception into the impressions and thoughts of two different groups. Through these two categories, Hume streamlined the depth of human understanding. David Hume is one of the most influential philosophers of the present age. Hume believes people get knowledge through experience and we should be skeptical about all other knowledge. Hume analyzes every aspect of life, but may be best recognized for his theory of causality. Hume established criteria for determining causality. These criteria explain his doubts about causality and why he reached the conclusion that man can not find the truth. In order to fully understand the analysis of the causal relationship of Hume, first you must understand that he emphasizes the sense. Hume is skeptical to everyone who has nothing to do with our senses. Hume divides human perception into two different categories: impressions and ideas. The impression includes feelings and emotions. They are ingenious, powerful and brilliant than ideas. They are what we see, hear, feel, love, or dislike We live in the world of experiences and inventions We live in the world that inherited knowledge acquired and created by David Hums, inventions, knowledge and special characters hundreds of years ago. Experience, but the 17th century is a fascinating era, major changes in social science, medicine, mathematics, and philosophy are realized, this is the historical era of Europe and the whole world. Supporting the rolling and mobile revolution are people without academic background, but they are all discovered through research and experiments. Through this semester I will do my best to submit the best education and career I have gained while studying this course. It is David Hume that I use his theme. David Hume raised doubts about the world's knowledge with the option of "skeptical of understanding behavior." This problem is related to induction problems. David Hume was one of the first people to decide to analyze this problem. He begins to choose by providing a form of segmentation of human knowledge and then discusses its dependence on reasoning and experience. According to Mr. Hume, people believe that the future will be similar to the past, but there is no evidence to support this belief. In this article, we will clarify the form of knowledge and inference and verify inductive problems of Hume. This is a challenge to the explanation of legitimate faith because there is no reason for belief.

Summary of David Hume and Max Scheler's emotions and values: Although a philosopher tends to eliminate the importance of every feeling towards moral life, other philosophers tend to devote them to moral life and value judgment It is at the center of the theory. In this article we will discuss two classic positions of the second type, the conflict between Hume and Scherrer's position. The ultimate goal of this conflict is meta theory - in particular it involves analyzing the relationship between emotional concepts and values ​​in this value judgment theory. Max Scheler (1874-1928) developed philosophical anthropology from the material ethics of value ("Materielle Wertethik") and opposed Emanuel Kant's responsibility ethics ("Pflichtethik"). He explained the hierarchical value system which further develops the phenomenological philosophy. Scheler explains that the human mind is composed of four layers as well as the organic layer. However, in his explanation, the human spirit is opposed by the principle of human spirit. Scheller's philosophy forms the basis of Victor Frankel's logic therapy and existential analysis From 1900 to 1920 Max Scherrer was the successor to Husserl's phenomenology, which was the hegemonic form of German philosophy of the day. Scherrer tried to apply Husserl's phenomenological approach to various topics. Since 1920, Scherrer has built the foundation of philosophical anthropology competing with phenomenology and other philosophical fields as a philosophical field. Husserl and Martin Heidegger (1889-1976) were then the two most prestigious philosophers in Germany and their criticisms of philosophical anthropology and Scherrer had a great influence on this subject. Philosophical anthropology is trying to connect various developed anthropology to the specialization of science. Max Scherrer distinguishes science, philosophy, theological anthropology, or interpretation of the basic structure of human activities, but these are ignorant of each other. Philosophical anthropology regards itself as disciplined discipline to prevent "disappearance of the center" of the thought described by that disorder and its followers. Traditional beliefs are broken down under the guidance of God, the king and feudal leader, God or nature, so today there is a lack of general direction. Like Protagoras, men are currently the only viable means. By adjusting and interpreting fragmented knowledge, philosophical anthropology aims to have a new understanding of the basic qualities and possibilities of human beings.

What is the first: chicken or egg. David Hume has advanced through the logic of the idea behind rationality and effect. He critically analyzed the reason behind these generally accepted views. Causal relationships seem to be completely logical and common sense, but he describes our impressions and thoughts and why they are believed. The progress of Hume begins with the first conclusion about the definition of the first reason and the theory of causality. As a result, the argument about Hume's cause-and-effect traces the same path as his epistemology and these two views supplement each other, so it is impossible to accept epistemology rather than rationally The opposite of causal reductionism and causal skepticism is a new tradition of rest. It began with Norman Kemp Smith's "David Hume's Philosophy" and defended Hume as a causal realist's viewpoint. In this way we deny the causality reduction theory and causality skepticism. - Causal relationships are known in principle. (Tooley 1987: 246-47) Considering the above explanation, Humean's causal realism is least intuitive, so it needs the most explanation. However, this position can be made more reasonable by introducing three explanatory tools that seem to require proper use to persuade the realistic interpretation. Two of them argue that Hume is respected in important respects, but it is a description of a realist who claims that unrealistic interpretation is often denied. An attractive similarity between William Okamem and David Hume, such as the general view of causality. Answer: Occam Hume's David Hume William did not deny a causal relationship. He accepted it. However, he says that empirical methods can not logically prove their necessity. Because for observations "constant relationship" of events, A "conventional continuity", and Hume, causality is what human beings naturally believe. The philosophy of Immanual Kant (1724-1804), the most influential philosopher since Aristotle, is an attempt to answer the skeptical philosophy of David Hume (1711-1776). According to Hume there is no reason to believe the causal relationship; for example, just because an object seems to have a law of gravity that always causes objects of the past to fall to the ground, the object will not change at such next gravity law There is no reason to believe it to follow. Kant agreed that Hume agreed that he could not understand how something behaves in the real world or the real world. But Kant adds new wrinkles. He thinks that each person's mind builds up a subjective world and that this subjective world is the world that each of us "knows".

In this article I will defend the moral theory of David Hume. This states that morality is a perception that comes from our emotional reaction, like visual and auditory. Morality is not objective, as morality arises from our emotional reaction rather than rationality. Furthermore, the emotional basis of morality has been empirically demonstrated in recent psychological studies, and the brain regions related to emotion are most active in making moral decisions. Our discussion is divided into two parts: morality continues to be part of our moral judgment, but it is mainly due to our emotional reactions, and finally what is caused by everyone It means. Moral theory asserts the existence of its own moral view through which we perceive good and evil. According to the early Scottish version of this theory such as Frances Hutcheson () and David Hume (), the discussed concept is reflexive based on emotion or emotion, which is secondary, perceived behavior . Or it is our usual feeling state. Moral theory may be described as intuitive theory; more generally, "intuitionism" is used only for the following purposes. For Hume, morality is independent of religion. He elaborated on the secular theory of virtue and moral meaning, as well as the moral obligation independent of God's order. Hume's interest in separating morality from religion may be due to his factual view that it is fundamentally conceptually unique and independent. But certainly at least part of his motivation to do so is a sense of peace. In other words, if religion is not clearly separated, they will distort morality. Hume is familiar with certain rational and sensible people like the bishops Joseph Butler and Sir Isaac Newton, but they have some sort of religious belief, but that is because religion is superstitious I believe it is enthusiasm. Really necessary estimate. What is true moral value? In fact, religious fanatics obscure moral obligations or may conflict with it When comparing David Hume and Emanuel Kant, David Hume and Emanuel Kant can make a big progress with each other theorists, suggest morals that do not need higher existence and God, and can recognize him. Moral responsibility Hume and Kant share some basic principles, but they have different views on morality. I found some moral theory by comparing the different opinions of human will to determine moral value and the sayings established by David Hume and Immanuel Kant.

According to the suicide National Institute of Mental Health seen from the eyes of Kant and Hume, "In 2007, [suicide] was the tenth most death cause in the United States and 34,598 people died." Although numbers are small, it is common for people around you to commit suicide, but this is a big problem (NIMH). About suicide, various emotions and opinions are mixed. Some people choose to believe this is the state of mind that will make people feel suicide. Kant argues that Hume 's view is that mathematical propositions are analyzed? It is totally different. ~ 1 1 If Hume uses Kant's term when discussing Hume, it means that the knowledge of mathematics is a priori! Indeed, as we learned from paragraph 2, this term is not strange for Hume; for CeUsal, Hume says. Regardless of any exception, knowledge of this relationship can not be obtained by a priori reasoning under any circumstances, but when it is found that specific objectives are often combined with each other, is. Make sure that things are presented to those with strong natural rationality and ability; if things are new to him, he will cause some cause or influence by the most accurate test of his reasonable quality You will not be able to find it either. (E 2 7) It is mathematics to rest here The reading I chose from Hume and Kant represents their final view on art philosophy. Hume's taste paper is his last philosophical writing, its existence is coincidental. Hume provided this article when his publisher suggested that his articles about suicide and immortality might be sued, but hoped to fill the gap in a series of articles. Kant read some of Hume's translated works, but Kant never read "preference of preference". Some of the paragraphs of "criminal criticism" sound like a reaction to Hume, which is due to their common influence in British tradition, and an understanding of beauty as a taste. Both studied the work of Shaftesbury's third work Anthony Cooper (1671-1713). They insist that we were born in "introverted eyes" which are particularly suitable for aesthetic sense. From the point of view of Aristotle (or French fries), the uniqueness of the Cant method is not special. As he copes with Hume, Kant is close to this as he did, and one of Hume's first challenges is the origin of "thinking". The problem of the first principle relates to the legitimacy of the proposition, but Hume's empirical approach can be traced back to the first question of the validity of the concepts making up the proposition. Rationalists do not worry about this. For Descartes, any concept that can be considered "clearly and clearly" can be used without hesitation or without doubt. Because the empathicist wants to track all "thoughts" back to experience, we are beginning to ask for credentials certificates.

Extensive summary of Hume's virtue: Traditionally the term "virtue" was used to denote morally superior personality such as mercy, charity, honesty, wisdom, honor. Ethicists usually do not provide a clear list of virtues, but the number of virtues being discussed is very small, their moral significance is obvious. The analysis of Hume's virtue is separated from this tradition in terms of the number of virtues discussed and clear moral significance. In his work "Humanity theory", David Hume divides virtues into two categories, artificial virtue and natural virtue. Hume pointed out that courage is a natural virtue in paper. Among the paper's "pride and humility, its purpose and cause", Hume clearly shows that courage is the cause of pride. Witness, goodwill, learning, courage, justice, honesty, all these are the reasons for pride, and the opposite of their humility. According to the paper artificial virtues include justice, loyalty, loyalty to the government, and virginity. Hume devoted a lot of arguments to justice, and he believes that justice is the artificial artificial virtue at its best. Hume understands that justice mainly concerns compliance with property integrity or property practices (T 3.2.2.28). Establishment of the property system, avoiding conflict, enjoying the possession and use of various products, the social value of the treaty on property is clear. One reason for concern that justice is Hume is that it has problems with moral motives and moral recognition. However, this position makes it difficult to understand how justice is a virtue; it is difficult to find the necessary natural and ethical incentives. Public and private mercy will not do this. Because neither can simply motivate all actions. David Hume offers some narrative on moral virtue. All of them relate virtue to the audience's entertainment experience. Hume believes that the joy that is appropriate for deciding virtues is happiness being corrected through a "general perspective". I think that the general way to solve this problem is to let the account accept such accusations: it can not fully consider the virtue of misunderstanding. We think we need to see Hume providing metaphysical and moral epistemology, and Hume 's virtue account can completely explain the error.

The causal relationship between Hume and causality is a tool used to combine events and create some kind of explanation. Hume lists "Three Principles of Connections between Ideas" to indicate different ways in which ideas can be tied together (14). These principles are similar, adjacent, there is a causal relationship. The focus of investigation on human understanding lies in the principle listed third. In the first part, Hume emphasizes the need to reveal the truth about human thought, even if that process may be difficult and exhausting. When discussing the interpretation of the causal relationship of Hume, its effect is explained in this relation. Hume explains the causal relationship in causality such as thinking, necessity, skepticism and so on. These three points explain the peak of Hume's causal theory. When discussing ideas, we must consider the fact that ideas range from the challenge of death to inspiration. For example, when Hume discussed ideology, he referred to the golden mountain. "When we think of golden mountains, we will combine only two unanimous ideas, gold and mountain, all of our thoughts or weak ideas are our impressions or a more vivid impression." (Hume 212) As long as there is an idea, there is a complex thought process reflecting whether the idea is beneficial or insignificant. What are these ideas yet "What if?" Usually comes from the causal relationship of specific ideas. What if he was arrested? The causal relationship between Hume and causality is a tool used to combine events and create some kind of explanation. Hume lists "Three Principles of Connections between Ideas" to indicate different ways in which ideas can be tied together (14). These principles are similar, adjacent, there is a causal relationship. The focus of investigation on human understanding lies in the principle listed third. In the first part, Hume 's sturdy Navy also. This tension of the competition that led to war was another reason for the First World War. Imperialism is another reason for the First World War. As defined in Dictionary.com, imperialism is "policies and nations that will expand and control the empire's rule and authority, and acquire and control colonies and dependents." The rapid development of the German economy is threatened

The problem of miracles is an ancient problem that has existed in most of human history, but over the past several centuries this problem has been solved to a certain depth. A great empiricist philosopher, David Hume, is one of the first people who tried to explain why they were created (from the human point of view from Hume), and why people are trying to believe it was. This is an important field of research and as more knowledge about the nature of the laws of physics has increased, more and more (not a few) miracles proved to be known as an exception to the laws of nature. I will proceed as follows. First, I answer the claims of Hume 's miracle belief. Then I present some conditions and the belief that a miracle will happen is correct if they match. Discussions on miracles in Hume's work fall into three categories. The first argument attacked the coherence or intelligibility of the concept of magic. The second thing accepted for discussion is that the concept is consistent, but for reasons of miracles it is believed that there is absolutely no evidence to believe in miracles. The third attacked the reliability of the report from people claiming to have witnessed a miraculous event. Abstract: David Hume believes that he discovered an "eternal check" for miraculous beliefs. However, carefully examined, there are some flaws that are wasteful of evidence. One example is Hume's confidence that a miraculous explanation is not always naturalistic. The purpose of this article is to see Hume's proposition and discussion on Chapter 10 "Miracles". The investigation of human understanding is wrong and shows that his argument is inconsistent. David Hume always answered negatively when asked if reasonably believed that other people 's testimony miraculously happened. This article will discuss why Hume believes that it is unreasonable to believe that the miracle will occur based on the testimony of others. Then I will discuss and support the use of circumstances surrounding testimony and testimony to believe in miracle reasons. "Miracles are to violate the laws of nature and the evidence of miracles is as complete as the arguments in experience, due to the firm and unchanging experience of the enactment of these laws from the nature of the facts. "(710) Since the reliability of the natural law and the reliability of the human testimony are neither an ideology relationship nor a 100% affirmation, Hume believes that it is unreasonable to believe that a miracle will occur based on the testimony of others I am in

David Hume's "Humanity Theory" divides the human virtues into two categories. It is natural and man-made. He considers that the law is artificial and invention of mankind. Therefore, he pointed out that justice is an artificial virtue and not a natural virtue. He believes that humans are inherently moral - they are born with a constant moral mind and in order to understand our "moral idea", study human psychology To do is the key. In this article I will explain the difference between Hume's nature and artificial virtue. Hume discussed a wide catalog of special virtues and vices. His story in "thesis" is based on the distinction between "natural" virtue and "human" virtue, which can easily be misunderstood. The question is not whether some virtues are fake or imitation, and whether other virtues are genuine or not. The problem is whether some people rely on social rules and customs, but others do not. Organizing his catalog by this distinction deals with people who believe that Hume emerges from people who think morality as a complete tradition (eg Bernard Mandeville) and social customs that it is independent of social customs Francis Hutcheson) According to Hume's view, some virtues depend on social customs, but others are not (Cohon 2008: 162-163). In both cases, he is trying to explain why people tend to develop these characteristics, and why they tend to pick sensible spectators. In his work "Humanity theory", David Hume divides virtues into two categories, artificial virtue and natural virtue. Hume pointed out that courage is a natural virtue in paper. Among the paper's "pride and humility, its purpose and cause", Hume clearly shows that courage is the cause of pride. Witness, goodwill, learning, courage, justice, honesty, all these are the reasons for pride, and the opposite of their humility. Hume identified two such virtues, one of which is the natural virtue. It is essential to understand the difference between this series of virtues and artificial virtues before exploring why Hume places great emphasis on artificial virtues and why they are distinguished from global virtues. Hume explains the virtues of nature as virtues as human beings in the natural environment, except for the social structures around us. Indeed, they are the values ​​we have in an environment without government, judicial system or social structure like monarch. You can see that Hume develops his thought using Thomas Hobbes' "state of nature" and other ideas. Social constraints, contracts, and Hume use it to understand what kind of virtue we might have in such an environment.

David Hume's causal relationship in the investigation of human understanding David Hume said in a survey of human understanding, "There is nothing to suggest power or necessary connection in any particular cause-and-effect relationship" (Hume, 1993: 41). Hume proposed in the second quarter that it arises from the impression that all ideas use feelings (11). Therefore, in order to have the concept of power or "necessary relationship", the impression of such a relationship must exist in a single causal relationship, and if there is no such impression it is called "necessary relationship" It is impossible to have ideas (52). I read the human understanding survey (1748) by David Hume at the university. I am not satisfied with this, this is not voluntary. The only purpose I started writing this book was to loot these interesting things for reference and citation. As books often occur - I reluctantly learned something. According to Mr. Dave, the impression is "vibrant vivid perception". They are instantaneous, unruly, and tweets of information are always integrated into our conscious and unconscious minds. For example, red is the impression. The same can be said about anger. The bell rang. warm. Itches it. Darkness ... Because we can not control what we feel, we can not control what we "impress". The impression is that we hear, see, feel, love, hate, desire, or hope will happen. They are primitive and instinctive and can be thought of as "atoms" of the thought process. Minimum particle to sum up to create - Survey on Human Understanding David Hume, Hume's claims will outline the conclusions about the future based on past experiences limited to possible assumptions. Because all discussion is through Hume 21's future influence hypothesis' secret power '(Hume 21), Hume means the ability of objects like buns of chunks,' ... I will support the human body. "(Hume 21) Hume claims to have a foundation When comparing Plato's seminar with the quest for human understanding of David Hume's philosophy, it means philosophy, love, and signs, words, when broken down into primitive Greek. Therefore, philosophy is love for language and linguistics. There is no way to see this love for words. Plato and David Hume investigate philosophy in their texts, seminars and investigations on human understanding.

I explain that Hume's argument seems to have reasons to explain why miracles are impossible. I agree with Hume's argument, I think it is correct; but I dispute some of his views. The central point that Hume tried to propose was that someone's testimony was unable to create a miracle. David Hume's "miracle" in David Hume's paper? miracle,? Hume has advocated various arguments about why people should not trust any miracle. Hume does not believe that miracles do not exist, but do not believe it because there is no reasonable background. One of his arguments, by definition, miracle is incredible. And there is no reasonable way to believe in miracles. Another argument is that most miracles often come from non-civilized interpretation or define miracles; miracles are violations of natural laws that are unusual for most people. When Hume said: "Nothing is considered a miracle, if it happened in a common process of nature, then he will explain this very clearly. A man that looks healthy will suddenly die It is not a miracle. "Hume, p. 888) Hume said that this death is abnormal, but it seems to happen naturally. Miraculous memory David Hume's "fairness about human understanding" is obvious, and he believes that no miracles will occur. Hume is a logical person who believes in knowledge experience. Of course, such people do not witness them, it is difficult to believe in extraordinary ideas. Especially when these events require a lot of faith. In order for the incident to be regarded as a miracle, it must violate the laws of nature. But, that is the same legal chief. David Hume devoted himself to part of his philosophy and tried to ignore his wrong assertion about the soul. In Hume's doubt, the German idealist began with Emmanuel Kant and left various cognitive and metaphysical problems. David Hume is an Scottish empiricist and became a philosopher for his metaphysical skepticism and explanation of his mind. Hume was born in the 18th century

David Hume has expressed strong support in the fourth section of the "human understanding survey". Hume said: "As a universal proposition I will take freedom to declare that I do not accept any exceptions, knowledge of this relationship is not obtained by a priori reasoning under any circumstances When discussing 'knowledge of this relationship', Hume refers to causality. Since all such knowledge is suspicious, this sentence can easily be regarded as being skeptical. David Hume Hume, David, 1711-76, Scottish philosopher, and historian. Hume brings empiricalism of John Rock and George Berkeley to the logical extremes of fundamental skepticism. He denied the possibility of certain kinds of knowledge and found a series of emotions in his mind and believed that the causal relationship in nature was entirely from B's introduction. The answer to the theme is drawn by the time committee named as illusion by David Hume, and the time committee named human by himself. In the era of modern philosophy, when the influence of Descartes was still important, David Hume brought the argument of killing the Descartes I created and skipping it like a ghost in human perception. You can see not only the theme but also the contrast between Hume and Descartes. Suicide analysis of David Hume "I do not think anyone will abandon their lives, but it is worth continuing." In a paper by David Hume "suicide" he pursued a philosophical argument about reasonable suicide. However, the underlying argument focuses on inappropriate evidence of the government and society, which condemns and prohibits such behavior, the creation of religion, and superstition and lies of God. Hume thinks that it is the final stage of the person's experience before observing observation. David Hume's induction problem. According to Hume, this reasoning method is logically effective. Logically reasonable reasoning indicates that if the premise is true, the conclusion must be true. Better still, if you accept this premise, you must accept that conclusion. There is no way to realize this place, and the conclusion is wrong. However, this is not the case as the use of a priori reasoning does not prove logically correct inductive reasoning.

David Hume's causal relationship in the investigation of human understanding David Hume said in a survey of human understanding, "There is nothing to suggest power or necessary connection in any particular cause-and-effect relationship" (Hume, 1993: 41). Hume proposed in the second quarter that it arises from the impression that all ideas use feelings (11). Therefore, in order to have the concept of power or "necessary relationship", the impression of such a relationship must exist in a single causal relationship, and if there is no such impression it is called "necessary relationship" It is impossible to have ideas (52). I read the human understanding survey (1748) by David Hume at the university. I am not satisfied with this, this is not voluntary. The only purpose I started writing this book was to loot these interesting things for reference and citation. As books often occur - I reluctantly learned something. According to Mr. Dave, the impression is "vibrant vivid perception". They are instantaneous, unruly, and tweets of information are always integrated into our conscious and unconscious minds. For example, red is the impression. The same can be said about anger. The bell rang. warm. Itches it. Darkness ... Because we can not control what we feel, we can not control what we "impress". The impression is that we hear, see, feel, love, hate, desire, or hope will happen. They are primitive and instinctive and can be thought of as "atoms" of the thought process. Minimum particle to sum up to create - Survey on Human Understanding David Hume, Hume's claims will outline the conclusions about the future based on past experiences limited to possible assumptions. Because all discussion is through Hume 21's future influence hypothesis' secret power '(Hume 21), Hume means the ability of objects like buns of chunks,' ... I will support the human body. "(Hume 21) Hume claims to have a foundation When comparing Plato's seminar with the quest for human understanding of David Hume's philosophy, it means philosophy, love, and signs, words, when broken down into primitive Greek. Therefore, philosophy is love for language and linguistics. There is no way to see this love for words. Plato and David Hume investigate philosophy in their texts, seminars and investigations on human understanding.

I am sorry for incestuous incestuousness with humans, not dogs. Whatever a person kills a deer, whatever it is, if he kills another person, that is wrong. Why are these lines being drawn between humans and animals? David Hume has answers to these questions. Many philosophers like St. Augustine believe that humans are morally different from animals because they can infer that Hume believes that it is passion and emotion that determines morality I will. In his book "Theory of Human Nature" he says that sin and virtue is not the fact we observed, but from the happiness and pain that felt in response to behavior (Hume, 218) . According to David Hume, the wisest of these philosophers, Reason is only a slave of passion and "Hume Creatures" has a completely unconscious moral sense of thinking. After moral judgment, rationality continues, it is too late to be too late. Hume claims that we derive moral sentiments from "direct emotions and better internal consciousness" rather than "assertive and inductive linkage". However, although moral philosophers are not happy, they climb to Emmanuel Kant, who brings the torch to Plato by trying to derive the objective basis of morality. Kant argues that moral requirements are based on objective criteria of reason. He took even important names and called the moral foundation "absolute order". Unethical behavior is irrational as it violates sacred CI. Kant believes that ethical behavior means starting with responsibility When comparing David Hume and Emanuel Kant, David Hume and Emanuel Kant can make a big progress with each other theorists, suggest morals that do not need higher existence and God, and can recognize him. Moral responsibility Hume and Kant share some basic principles, but they have different views on morality. By comparing different opinions of human will to determine moral value and the maxims established by David Hume and Immanuel Kant, I discovered that there are several moral theories. Kant believes that moral argument is effective, but the last few centuries of philosophy saw a powerful question about the existence of God which is the theory of Immanuel Kant, David Hume and Anthonyfulle. The house made. As Alvin Plantinga states, the answer by this writer is whether faith is "the right foundation" or the evidence-based position is taken like Richard Swinburne. Some experts believe that only some discussion about the existence of God is persuasive, but believe that faith requires risk rather than product of reason. They say that there is no danger if the argument about the existence of God is as strong as the law of logic, they say that Pascal 's position is "reason why in mind".

Definition of the Two Reasons of David Hume The definition of two reasons in "Humanity" and "Exploration of Human Understanding" by David Hume was the focus of his controversy on the actual view of causality. The majority of the discussion focused on the lack of consistency between the two definitions and the definition as part of the larger text. Regarding the latter objection, Hume points out in the advertisement of the author that the paper "predicted research before leaving the university", so it can be supplemented by asserting the explanation proposed in the survey. He did not announce it. David Hume Hume, David, 1711-76, Scottish philosopher, and historian. Hume brings empiricalism of John Rock and George Berkeley to the logical extremes of fundamental skepticism. He denied the possibility of certain kinds of knowledge and found a series of emotions in his mind and believed that the causal relationship in nature was entirely from B's introduction. The answer to the theme is drawn by the time committee named as illusion by David Hume, and the time committee named human by himself. In the era of modern philosophy, when the influence of Descartes was still important, David Hume brought the argument of killing the Descartes I created and skipping it like a ghost in human perception. You can see not only the theme but also the contrast between Hume and Descartes. Our recognition and memory The famous philosophers David Hume and Rene Descartes are those who are looking for answers and definitions of individual identity. Both of them considered their ideas and issued two different conclusions. Some people think that individual identity can not be understood, but others confirm that their certainty is their thinking and perception. David Hume begins discussing personal identity by denying this It is usually defined in three different ways: material quality, biological and personal identity. In an article by David Hume and John Locke, they studied the meaning of identity with three simple sub theories. Both agreed on specific functions, but the other characteristics were totally different. Are they identified as the same person over time? Hume and Locke wrote a paper on concrete assumptions about identity. The author provides various examples to the reader

In this paper, we propose a strategy for constructing modern Hume 's distribution theory theory. It will lay the foundation for my so-called entrepreneurial welfare state. Supporting his model of the distribution of justice resources by combining insight into the origin and purpose of justice of David Hume and insurance based on Ronald Dokin's insurance will create a country as a matter of justice , Has been claimed. Encourage members to participate in entrepreneurial spirit. Activities to protect them from the worst effects of market economy. Justice research is usually defined by the theory of John Rawls. Justice theory focuses on the principle of logistics in society. The decisive argument of the environmental justice movement is a model to violate some of the principles of distribution of justice theory. Some modern scholars have developed a wider justice theory than the theory of justice distribution. Research on justice theories applied to environmental justice mainly focuses on "bias of distribution". In other words, research in this field is that poor communities, communities of indigenous peoples, and colorful communities are affected by negative external factors related to the environment regardless of environmental protection It is focused on the fact that there are many. In this paper, we propose a strategy for constructing modern Hume 's distribution theory theory. It will lay the foundation for my so-called entrepreneurial welfare state. - Small and medium enterprises are considered to be the main pillars of the world. For example, in many European countries, SMEs are considered to play an important role in the success and prosperity of the whole country. Most people want to achieve ownership, independent interests and personal success, starting with small business. If the plan is right, SMEs can prove very successful. Nozick classifies distribution theory theory into two categories. The first classification is whether the theory is historical or historical, and the difference is whether or not the theory considers past action / event / situation (history) (non-historical). A more important difference between Nozick's different distributive justice theory lies in the theory of patterns and the theory without patterns. Patterned justice theory refers to the theory that distribution rates are determined or associated with variables. For example, Utilitarian theory of justice will assign social goods according to their practical level of promotion, so it will be a pattern of justice theory. Patternless theory does not refer to world variables to determine who gets what. Nozick's claim to justice theory of justice is to use the example of Wilt Chamberlain to argue that they are incompatible with freedom and to discuss this.

Summary of Hume of Dialogue Analysis on Natural Religion: Hume's Dialogue on Natural Religion (1779), like human technology and design, can be read in the same way as Cleanthes (and Philo). There are smart writers or writers that can start with the five facts of Hume's text: independence of Hume's character, indirectness of discourse of character, way of interaction of personality and way of life of them. The entanglement of Pamphilus as an internal author; and how the reader participates in the dialogue. Hume's greatest achievement in religious philosophy is a dialogue on natural religion, which is often considered one of the most important and influential contributions to this philosophy field. Hume's book was all controversial, but his conversation was very exciting and his friends persuaded to ban the publication before publishing them to him. Hume's philosophical project and the way he developed to do it will determine the strategy he adopted in all discussions. Discussion on causality and ethics has a preliminary critical stage in which Hume evaluates the discussion of contemporaries with his predecessor and then evaluates the constructive stages he develops his position . But in natural religious discussions the situation is quite different. Dialogue on nature religion (1779) was taught after his death by his nephew David Hume the Younger. The argument between the three fictional figures about the essence of God is an important depiction of the design controversy. Despite some controversy, most scholars believe that Philo's viewpoint is closest to Hume's perspective, Philo is the most skeptical of the three. Hume died in 1776 and the natural religious dialogue after his death was announced in 1779. Champions of the design controversy carefully watched Mr. David Hume's skeptical criticism and reexplained their arguments to counter them. William Perry was the most convincing defender of the design argument in the early 19th century. Paley's natural theology was published in 1802, the dialogue on natural religion was published for 23 years. (I am referring to this fact because many believe in the myth that is still repeated because Hume makes a surprisingly obsolete Payy's argument.) He reads Hume's conversation Actually, he also mentioned in his book, Chapter 26, page 512, "Mr. Hume, a dialogue after death". In addition, as a result of careful consideration of Paley's design controversy, he found out that he predicted and responded to Hume's major criticisms.

David Hume's article "Taste Standards" solves the problem of how to determine objects. Hume solved three hypotheses on how to determine the aesthetic value. These assumptions are as follows. All preferences are equal, one art is better than the other art, the aesthetic value of art is defined by human preference (from the lecture). However, Hume discovered that these three beliefs are hypothetical "contradictory triples" (from the lecture). If all the tastes are the same, and the taste determines the aesthetic value, some art is good, what is wrong? The paper on the famous "taste standard" by David Hume suggests and discusses epistemological problems raised by subjectivity in aesthetics. If beauty is our idea and not a feature unrelated to our purpose, how do we understand the possibilities of correctness and inaccuracy in this field? This problem is more obvious to Hume as he is strengthening Hutchison's subjectivity. "Happiness and pain ... not only the waiters necessary for beauty and malformation, but also their essence" ("Thesis", Part 2, Part 1, Part 8). But, if you are expressing whether taste judgment is based on subjective feelings, how is it likely to be wrong? David Hume's article "Taste Standards" solves the problem of how to determine objects. Hume solved three hypotheses on how to determine the aesthetic value. These assumptions are as follows. All preferences are equal, one art is better than the other art, the aesthetic value of art is defined by human preference (from the lecture). However, Hume discovered that these three beliefs are hypothetical "contradictory triples" (from the lecture). If all the tastes are the same, and the taste determines the aesthetic value, some art is good, what is wrong? In the prospect of David Hume's prose, the Qur'an is described as "absurd appearance" of "pretending prophets" and lacks "fair morality". He said that he participated in the story, "We quickly discover that such treachery, inhumanity, cruelty, revenge, prejudice, etc. are not fully compatible with civil society and are admired As long as it is good or harmful for a true believer, pay attention to every action that is condemned or admired. " In the article on Hume 's taste criteria, he believes that art works for a long time, and some facts of some people make them a real criticism of beauty or quality. In this article, Hume argues that one art work is objectively superior to the others, and some people are correct in his argument that identifying them over others is actually better Let's see. The explanation of the true judgment is completely unrealistic, in fact it hinders our understanding of the good taste. Although Mr. Hume's true judgment is an extraordinary individual, he considers the value of comparing several opinions before deciding the social dynamics of our beauty assessment and the quality of a particular work It is not put in. Although I propose the idea that the judgment of the work can not be decided by my opinion, in fact it can only use enough opinions to draw conclusions.

Hume is the first thinker to point out the meaning of "representative perception theory". He inherited this theory from his rationalists and predecessors of the empiricist. According to this view, when one says that he saw something like an apple, it actually means that he has spiritual thoughts, images and impressions in his mind. Such data is an intrinsic, psychological, subjective expression of what I think is an external, physical fact. As a theory, Utilitarianism is usually thought to begin with Jeremy Bentham, but David Hume says "Investigation of moral principles" (1), Francis Hutchinson (David Hume also has a similar view on the study conducted Utilitarianism tells us that action is moral because it is the greatest benefit for the greatest number of people It creates us to distribute happiness among all beings and tells us to see which distribution maximizes happiness, which provides a systematic answer.Past 2 During the century, Utilitarianism had a great influence on the field of practice in politics and economics, so that Utilitarianism influenced the lives of modern society, especially public policy, to make people's lives better Not because, not so much So, what is important when doing political deliberations? In a survey of moral principles (Appendix II - self-love), David Hume proposed six objections he calls "selfish assumptions." It can be said that it is an ancient psychological self-interest. First, Hume believes that self-interest is to moral sentiment. It may motivate people to take care of others and motivate others to behave. These moral sentiments include love, friendship, compassion and appreciation. Second, psychological self-interests try to reduce human motivation to a single cause. It is a "futile" job - "Simple love ... It was always the root of many miscalculations in philosophy." Third, it is clear that animals act with kindness, and if they acknowledge that animals can behave selfishly, how can they be denied in humans? Fourth, the concept we use to explain benevolent behavior can not be meaningless; sometimes the agent obviously bless her although she has no individual interested in the wealth of others I will. Hume's main moral sentence is the third volume of his humanitarian discourse, "ethical" (Vol. 2, "in passion"), the quest for his moral principles, and some of his essays is. To some extent, an ethical investigation reinterprets the central idea from the ethical part of the essay in a more meaningful way; however, there are some important differences. The ethical position and discussion of this thesis are as follows, show the place where the ethics survey coincides, then discuss the difference between the survey and this thesis.

Extensive summary of Hume's virtue: Traditionally the term "virtue" was used to denote morally superior personality such as mercy, charity, honesty, wisdom, honor. Ethicists usually do not provide a clear list of virtues, but the number of virtues being discussed is very small, their moral significance is obvious. The analysis of Hume's virtue is separated from this tradition in terms of the number of virtues discussed and clear moral significance. In his work "Humanity theory", David Hume divides virtues into two categories, artificial virtue and natural virtue. Hume pointed out that courage is a natural virtue in paper. Among the paper's "pride and humility, its purpose and cause", Hume clearly shows that courage is the cause of pride. Witness, goodwill, learning, courage, justice, honesty, all these are the reasons for pride, and the opposite of their humility. According to the paper artificial virtues include justice, loyalty, loyalty to the government, and virginity. Hume devoted a lot of arguments to justice, and he believes that justice is the artificial artificial virtue at its best. Hume understands that justice mainly concerns compliance with property integrity or property practices (T 3.2.2.28). Establishment of the property system, avoiding conflict, enjoying the possession and use of various products, the social value of the treaty on property is clear. One reason for concern that justice is Hume is that it has problems with moral motives and moral recognition. However, this position makes it difficult to understand how justice is a virtue; it is difficult to find the necessary natural and ethical incentives. Public and private mercy will not do this. Because neither can simply motivate all actions. David Hume offers some narrative on moral virtue. All of them relate virtue to the audience's entertainment experience. Hume believes that the joy that is appropriate for deciding virtues is happiness being corrected through a "general perspective". I think that the general way to solve this problem is to let the account accept such accusations: it can not fully consider the virtue of misunderstanding. We think we need to see Hume providing metaphysical and moral epistemology, and Hume 's virtue account can completely explain the error.

Knowledge can only be obtained through experience, and experiences exist only as a unit of individual thought in thinking. This knowledge theory belongs to Scottish philosopher David Hume. Hume was born April 26, 1711 and is the second son of his family. His father died when he was a baby and asked his mother to take care of his brothers and sisters. David Hume gained great success through the general curriculum and discovered early love for literature. He lives in Ninewells, a family-owned land near Edinburgh. David Hume Hume, David, 1711-76, Scottish philosopher, and historian. Hume brings empiricalism of John Rock and George Berkeley to the logical extremes of fundamental skepticism. He denied the possibility of certain kinds of knowledge and found a series of emotions in his mind and believed that the causal relationship in nature was entirely from B's introduction. The answer to the theme is drawn by the time committee named as illusion by David Hume, and the time committee named human by himself. In the era of modern philosophy, when the influence of Descartes was still important, David Hume brought the argument of killing the Descartes I created and skipping it like a ghost in human perception. You can see not only the theme but also the contrast between Hume and Descartes. Knowledge can only be obtained through experience, and experiences exist only as a unit of individual thought in thinking. This knowledge theory belongs to Scottish philosopher David Hume. Hume was born April 26, 1711 and is the second son of his family. His father died when he was a baby and asked his mother to take care of his brothers and sisters. David Hume gained great success through the general curriculum and discovered early love for literature. - Tested in various ways: The Catholic clergy of today's church by Christopher Ruddy also reflects the first article at Obleash Theological Seminary in San Antonio, Texas. The 7th Bernardine Cardinal Conference 2003 Ruddy reports on the sharing of academic and pastorian expertise and the voice of being a pastor. In addition to the report, this book opens and completes Ruddy's insight.

Empiricism (try something for yourself): All knowledge has to pass the doctrine of sensory communication; there is no natural idea that it is enough to remember (Ie Plato) All knowledge can be reduced to feelings. In other words, our concept is simply to feel the image. In short, there is no other knowledge besides knowledge gained through perceptual observation. Remember, according to Descartes, the first thing I know is my opinion. At that time, he wondered if this fictitious world would exist, so he began with his own idea and then became a reality next (not the other way). Knowledge can only be obtained through experience, and experiences exist only as a unit of individual thought in thinking. This knowledge theory belongs to Scottish philosopher David Hume. Hume was born April 26, 1711 and is the second son of his family. His father died when he was a baby and asked his mother to take care of his brothers and sisters. David Hume gained great success through the general curriculum and discovered early love for literature. - Tested in various ways: The Catholic clergy of today's church by Christopher Ruddy also reflects the first article at Obleash Theological Seminary in San Antonio, Texas. The 7th Bernardine Cardinal Conference 2003 Ruddy reports on the sharing of academic and pastorian expertise and the voice of being a pastor. In addition to the report, this book opens and completes Ruddy's insight. David Hume Hume, David, 1711-76, Scottish philosopher, and historian. Hume brings empiricalism of John Rock and George Berkeley to the logical extremes of fundamental skepticism. He denied the possibility of certain kinds of knowledge and found a series of emotions in his mind and believed that the causal relationship in nature was entirely from B's introduction. The answer to the theme is drawn by the time committee named as illusion by David Hume, and the time committee named human by himself. In the era of modern philosophy, when the influence of Descartes was still important, David Hume brought the argument of killing the Descartes I created and skipping it like a ghost in human perception. You can see not only the theme but also the contrast between Hume and Descartes. David Hume raised doubts about the world's knowledge with the option of "skeptical of understanding behavior." This problem is related to induction problems. David Hume was one of the first people to decide to analyze this problem. He begins to choose by providing a form of segmentation of human knowledge and then discusses its dependence on reasoning and experience. According to Mr. Hume, people believe that the future will be similar to the past, but there is no evidence to support this belief. In this article, we will clarify the form of knowledge and inference and verify inductive problems of Hume. This is a challenge to the explanation of legitimate faith because there is no reason for belief.

Introduction Briefly, aesthetics is a study of art, aesthetics, and judgment. As society often does not regard art as a functional effort, this series of studies seems pointless, indeed, Oscar Wilde, a professor of aestheticism who is a famous aesthetician and said it, said. "But this sentence is misleading, the same man said:" Aesthetics is a sign of pursuit of beauty, which is a beautiful science for people to explore the relevance of art. David Hume's article "Taste Standards" solves the problem of how to determine objects. Hume solved three hypotheses on how to determine the aesthetic value. These assumptions are as follows. All preferences are equal, one art is better than the other art, the aesthetic value of art is defined by human preference (from the lecture). However, Hume discovered that these three beliefs are hypothetical "contradictory triples" (from the lecture). If all the tastes are the same, and the taste determines the aesthetic value, some art is good, what is wrong? The paper on the famous "taste standard" by David Hume suggests and discusses epistemological problems raised by subjectivity in aesthetics. If beauty is our idea and not a feature unrelated to our purpose, how do we understand the possibilities of correctness and inaccuracy in this field? This problem is more obvious to Hume as he is strengthening Hutchison's subjectivity. "Happiness and pain ... not only the waiters necessary for beauty and malformation, but also their essence" ("Thesis", Part 2, Part 1, Part 8). But, if you are expressing whether taste judgment is based on subjective feelings, how is it likely to be wrong? In the prospect of David Hume's prose, the Qur'an is described as "absurd appearance" of "pretending prophets" and lacks "fair morality". He said that he participated in the story, "We quickly discover that such treachery, inhumanity, cruelty, revenge, prejudice, etc. are not fully compatible with civil society and are admired As long as it is good or harmful for a true believer, pay attention to every action that is condemned or admired. " In the article on Hume 's taste criteria, he believes that art works for a long time, and some facts of some people make them a real criticism of beauty or quality. In this article, Hume argues that one art work is objectively superior to the others, and some people are correct in his argument that identifying them over others is actually better Let's see. The explanation of the true judgment is completely unrealistic, in fact it hinders our understanding of the good taste. Although Mr. Hume's true judgment is an extraordinary individual, he considers the value of comparing several opinions before deciding the social dynamics of our beauty assessment and the quality of a particular work It is not put in. Although I propose the idea that the judgment of the work can not be decided by my opinion, in fact it can only use enough opinions to draw conclusions.

In this article, I claim that Hume 's response to the "missing blue shadow" is satisfactory. First, I will explain Hume's explanation of the relationship between impressions and ideas and the principles of duplication. Then I will check the relationship between this "missing blue shadow" and this account. Then I will discuss Hume's response to his own counterexample and evaluate his position by considering possible objections and reactions to his views. Then I will explain why the response to the example of Hume's "missing blue shadow" is satisfactory. Hume criticized the argument of this general form very aggressively (and familiarly) with several important steps. (Hume's main critical discussion is included in Hume 1779. Hume's reaction is widely viewed as a paradigm counterargument to traditional design arguments.) For Hume (1), Hume I believe that analogy is not very good. It does not look so much like artifacts, and it is very different from them - eg whether life, autonomy or not. Indeed, advocates of design theory frequently refer to the similarity between the universe and the human machine, but Hume (a part of the tongue may be only a part) is not a machine rather than a machine I think that it is close to an organism. However, if so - called similarities are far apart in related terms, that inference becomes logically weak. In this article, I claim that Hume 's response to the "missing blue shadow" is satisfactory. First, I will explain Hume's explanation of the relationship between impressions and ideas and the principles of duplication. Then I will check the relationship between this "missing blue shadow" and this account. Then I will discuss Hume's response to his own counterexample and evaluate his position by considering possible objections and reactions to his views. Then I will explain why the response to the example of Hume's "missing blue shadow" is satisfactory. What does Hum's view of the heart mean? What will he divide into several categories? Based on what? Are these binary categories mutually exclusive? General and thorough? What is your impression? A simple idea? Is it a complicated idea? For example. What is inner feeling? Appearance? How is copy (idea) similar to original (impression and emotion)? What is the difference between them? What is Hume's argument and argument, and a simple idea is a copy of the impression. Does he intend to treat this argument as meaningless, generic or universal? So how can opponents object to this discussion? What is the philosophical position of what is called a simple idea, is there a corresponding impression? How was this paper made with closed microscope? What is the relevance of the missing blue shadow? What is the ultimate treatment of Hume against this incident?

This paper critically examines Hume's assertion on knowledge / existence of substantial ideas. This denial is rooted in his epistemology, which is based on the theory that complicated thinking lacking a corresponding impression is created by three relations, imagination, memory, and impression, three relationships, similarity, continuity, and a constant connection includes. The key to my criticism is to point out that these relationships are such that only unified agents over the long term can interact with them in a way to explain them in a hurry. David Hume Hume, David, 1711-76, Scottish philosopher, and historian. Hume brings empiricalism of John Rock and George Berkeley to the logical extremes of fundamental skepticism. He denied the possibility of certain kinds of knowledge and found a series of emotions in his mind and believed that the causal relationship in nature was entirely from B's introduction. The answer to the theme is drawn by the time committee named as illusion by David Hume, and the time committee named human by himself. In the era of modern philosophy, when the influence of Descartes was still important, David Hume brought the argument of killing the Descartes I created and skipping it like a ghost in human perception. You can see not only the theme but also the contrast between Hume and Descartes. Our recognition and memory The famous philosophers David Hume and Rene Descartes are those who are looking for answers and definitions of individual identity. Both of them considered their ideas and issued two different conclusions. Some people think that individual identity can not be understood, but others confirm that their certainty is their thinking and cognitive ability. David Hume begins discussing personal identity by denying this David Hume is studying physical and mental problems. Hume also investigated the person's character, the relationship between humans and animals, and the nature of the agent. Hume pointed out that we tend to think we are the same person five years ago. We have changed in various ways, but the same person appears there. You can start thinking about which functions can be changed without changing the fundamental self. However, Hume denies that there are differences between the various features of people and the magical self that is said to have these characteristics. "In addition to specific awareness, we will never pay close attention to anything - human beings are turning at incredible speed, a bunch or collection of different cognitions in constant flow and movement "

There is no main source of information to understand historical events and people. Because this event contains direct information, do not worry that the data is incorrect as the author witnessed the incident there. But the main problem with the main source of information is that it covers only a part of the story. Therefore, if you have a book about the concentration camps of World War II, everyone involved in that camp will see this. It is not what happened during the actual war. Hume has responded to his work in various ways. When entering the eyes of the public, Hume quickly won a group of admirers and disciples, including Adam Smith and historian Edward Gibbons. Immanuel Kant and Rousseau praised Hume and his work very exaggerated, the former considered the only philosopher who is skeptical of his logical conclusion, the latter declared as follows. In his hometown, the only historian who wrote it fairly ... he measured and calculated human error while keeping its weak point. "But writing the full-length attack logic, reasoning and philosophical principles of James Beatty and Joseph Priestley Hume, Thomas Gray says about Hume's philosophical work," I always David Hume is a harmful writer I thought he was doing here, there are as many countries as you have. " Edward Feather first began attacking sensual problems by attacking Hume's way. As Edward Feather understands, to easily summarize Hume's forks (Osherov thinks this reading is wrong and better than George Dickel). After Feser's reply to Massimoomo Pigliucci, Feser summarized self-opposition objections as follows: Any suggestion that does not include "thought relationship" or "de facto problem" can include "refinement" It is as much as possible. And it was sophisticated. Of course, from the viewpoint of Hume, suspicious propositions include traditional metaphysical propositions. Piglici thought that Hume 's position was "one" when he first met it. However, the problem is that Hume's Fokker is the expectation of the verification principle of the positivist, and there is a similar problem.

Hume's mental game Human thought is a very complex machine. There have been a lot of attempts to explain how human thinking works, but it has not been successful. After reading Hume I agree with many of the things he explained. In my opinion, Hume is the closest thing to exposing thought. Robert Hume handled much of what Decarte spoke of in his work. The difference between Decarte and Hume is that Hume "resolves" many of the "wrinkles" left by Decarte. David Hume Hume, David, 1711-76, Scottish philosopher, and historian. Hume brings empiricalism of John Rock and George Berkeley to the logical extremes of fundamental skepticism. He denied the possibility of certain kinds of knowledge and found a series of emotions in his mind and believed that the causal relationship in nature was entirely from B's introduction. The answer to the theme is drawn by the time committee named as illusion by David Hume, and the time committee named human by himself. In the era of modern philosophy, when the influence of Descartes was still important, David Hume brought the argument of killing the Descartes I created and skipping it like a ghost in human perception. You can see not only the theme but also the contrast between Hume and Descartes. Our recognition and memory The famous philosophers David Hume and Rene Descartes are those who are looking for answers and definitions of individual identity. Both of them considered their ideas and issued two different conclusions. Some people think that individual identity can not be understood, but others confirm that their certainty is their thinking and cognitive ability. David Hume begins discussing personal identity by denying this

There are different kinds of miracles that exist in people who have reasons to believe them. Thomas Hume thinks that the miracle is not real. He said that all "miracles" have reasonable explanations behind them and rational methods to explain them. On the contrary, survivors of environments almost imaginable will regard their existence as a phenomenon or a miracle. On the other hand, there are philosophers who reasonably understand why miracles do not exist, but on the other hand survivors associate life and death with a certain miracle. David Hume's "miracle" in David Hume's paper? miracle,? Hume has advocated various arguments about why people should not trust any miracle. Hume does not believe that miracles do not exist, but do not believe it because there is no reasonable background. One of his arguments, by definition, miracle is incredible. And there is no reasonable way to believe in miracles. Another argument is that most miracles often come from non-civilized interpretation or define miracles; miracles are violations of natural laws that are unusual for most people. When Hume said: "Nothing is considered a miracle, if it happened in a common process of nature, then he will explain this very clearly. A man that looks healthy will suddenly die It is not a miracle. "Hume, p. 888) Hume said that this death is abnormal, but it seems to happen naturally. Miraculous memory David Hume's "fairness about human understanding" is obvious, and he believes that no miracles will occur. Hume is a logical person who believes in knowledge experience. Of course, such people do not witness them, it is difficult to believe in extraordinary ideas. Especially when these events require a lot of faith. In order for the incident to be regarded as a miracle, it must violate the laws of nature. But, that is the same legal chief. David Hume devoted himself to part of his philosophy and tried to ignore his wrong assertion about the soul. In Hume's doubt, the German idealist began with Emmanuel Kant and left various cognitive and metaphysical problems. David Hume is an Scottish empiricist and became a philosopher for his metaphysical skepticism and explanation of his mind. Hume was born in the 18th century Critical views of Hume's work in the 19th and 20th centuries often reflect the differences in the 18th century, but added a more detailed analysis of Hume's history and philosophical method. Thomas Jefferson declared, "If Hume is faithful, it will be the best historical fragment ever," and Hume said, "I held down the truth, lied, forged the authorities, forged the record" Added. Drich von Schlegel found a more admirable praise in Hume's words, but he also imposed on Hugh's party his own "narrow view of the principle and things is not entirely fair". Nonetheless, Hume's work - history and philosophy - has the first important biographer, John Hilbert, of their supporters Hume. Thomas H. Huxley also gave Hume a basic explanation with details of his philosophy.

As an experientist and a skeptic, he demanded that "human reasons, blind and narrow boundary weaknesses be fully understood." (131) There is no right to speculate theology because humans have no historical knowledge of science or the universe. He is "the only scientific subject that can contradict contradiction, material compliance, causal, expanded, spatial, temporal, and behavioral thinking, in essence varying amounts of substance, certainty or evidence" It continues to ask for. In the dialogue on nature and religion of David Hume, Philo claims that "such idea of ​​God" is consistent with the essence of the world. God formed the world and everything in it. Therefore abstract logical parallelism exists between the essence of the world and the essence of God. Philo's argument can answer Gretchen's challenge. As long as Gretchen is given an explanation of how God has so many evil evidences in the world she will see this as a satisfying reaction. Discussion as to whether God exists or not is a long-term argument over centuries. In David Hume's "Natural Religious Dialogue", this problem is solved through dialogue and discussion between Hume's fictional role Cleanthes and Philo. The argument advocated by Cleanthes is that the existence of God can be confirmed by humans and presented in the form of "design controversy". Philo then made several opposing views to explain why this discussion failed. In this article we will discuss the design theory of Cleanthes and detail criticism of Philo's position on Cleanthes. In a dialogue on David Hume's natural religion, he evaluated two general evil ways and design controversies. The two versions of the "sin problem" are the first stronger version called the logical problem of evil as they apply to the presence or absence of God, and the second version which is not bad is called evil . Evidence Problems The logic of evil says that there is no evil if God is an omnipotent, omniscient, all encompassing being. Because there is evil, there should be no god. The evil problem of the evidence is Hum's accepted version. We can think that the existence of evil is part of a series of evidence to evaluate the existence of God and based on the evidence we can not conclude that God is perfect. Hume allows complete God's possibility, but to say this argument is not enough for us to reach that conclusion

In Hume's dialogue on nature's religion, we are to discuss the purpose of God and its nature, more specifically the three roles that humans can infer God and its nature Was introduced. Three words, Demea, Philo, and Cleanthes, are involved in discussions on this issue, but they all help to support their views on this issue. The focus of discussion was the "design theory" proposed by Cleanthes, Demea and Philo tried to destroy it. Discussion as to whether God exists or not is a long-term argument over centuries. In David Hume's "Natural Religious Dialogue", this problem is solved through dialogue and discussion between Hume's fictional role Cleanthes and Philo. The argument advocated by Cleanthes is that the existence of God can be confirmed by humans and presented in the form of "design controversy". Philo then made several opposing views to explain why this discussion failed. In this article we will discuss the design theory of Cleanthes and detail criticism of Philo's position on Cleanthes. In a dialogue on David Hume's natural religion, he evaluated two general evil ways and design controversies. The two versions of the "sin problem" are the first stronger version called the logical problem of evil as they apply to the presence or absence of God, and the second version which is not bad is called evil . Evidence Problems The logic of evil says that there is no evil if God is an omnipotent, omniscient, all encompassing being. Because there is evil, there should be no god. The evil problem of the evidence is Hum's accepted version. We can think that the existence of evil is part of a series of evidence to evaluate the existence of God and based on the evidence we can not conclude that God is perfect. Hume allows complete God's possibility, but to say this argument is not enough for us to reach that conclusion In the dialogue on nature and religion of David Hume, Philo claims that "such idea of ​​God" is consistent with the essence of the world. God formed the world and everything in it. Therefore abstract logical parallelism exists between the essence of the world and the essence of God. Philo's argument can answer Gretchen's challenge. As long as Gretchen is given an explanation of how God has so many evil evidences in the world she will see this as a satisfying reaction.

When comparing Plato's seminar with the quest for human understanding of David Hume's philosophy, it means philosophy, love, and signs, words, when broken down into primitive Greek. Therefore, philosophy is love for language and linguistics. There is no way to see this love for words. Plato and David Hume investigate philosophy in their texts, seminars and investigations on human understanding. We outline the philosophical views of these two philosophers and then compare them to show that philosophy is balanced. I read the human understanding survey (1748) by David Hume at the university. I am not satisfied with this, this is not voluntary. The only purpose I started writing this book was to loot these interesting things for reference and citation. As books often occur - I reluctantly learned something. According to Mr. Dave, the impression is "vibrant vivid perception". They are instantaneous, unruly, and tweets of information are always integrated into our conscious and unconscious minds. For example, red is the impression. The same can be said about anger. The bell rang. warm. Itches it. Darkness ... Because we can not control what we feel, we can not control what we "impress". The impression is that we hear, see, feel, love, hate, desire, or hope will happen. They are primitive and instinctive and can be thought of as "atoms" of the thought process. Minimum particle to sum up to create - When comparing Plato's seminar with the quest for human understanding of David Hume's philosophy, it means philosophy, love, and signs, words, when broken down into primitive Greek. Therefore, philosophy is love for language and linguistics. There is no way to see this love for words. Plato and David Hume investigate philosophy in their texts, seminars and investigations on human understanding. - Plato was born in an aristocratic family of Athens, Greece. When he was a child his father, Ariston, was thought of as the descendant of the early king of Athens, and his mother Perictione married Pyrilampes. When young, Plato is always interested in political leadership and eventually becomes a disciple of Socrates. He follows his philosophy and dialectic, and it is believed to pursue the truth through questions, answers and other questions.

Hume's argument to distinguish between kindness and self-love lies in the investigation of his moral principle, and Hume accuses skeptical philosophers who deny the existence of moral differences. I doubt that he or she is so indifferent that he or she can not distinguish between good and evil. Hume believes that the differences between males arise from nature, customs and education. Hume believes that it can not claim that there is absolutely no moral difference, no matter how skeptical or skeptical. In his study of the principle of self-love, Hume did not reject all aspects of egoist of justice and lack of kindness in human motives. He acknowledges many motives in human nature and explains the mixing of elements in our nature with the metaphor of pigeons, wolves and snakes. In principle, he regards mankind in the field of moral behavior as a mixture of kindness and self-love. Egoist believes that human beings are limited to the pursuit of survival, fear, ambition, and happiness, but Hume believes that motives of people are all kinds of generosity and generous passion. He insists that these factors vary from person to person. Because there is no unique information about that person, there is no way to know whether that person usually dominates and controls self-love or vice versa. Hume's moral psychology and ethics make sympathetic motives important in moral life. He believes that the natural kindness mostly explains his so-called moral origin. The main theme is defending his mercy as a principle of humanity, as opposed to the theory of psychological self-interest. In Hume's moral theory, many people are directed to the theory of Mandeville (probably Hobbes) that human motive behaviors are private interests and humans are neither good nor kind to communication. Hume believes that self-interest is based on wrong moral psychology, and we consider that kindness is a "primitive" feature of human nature. Kindness is the most important principle of Hum's human morality, but he also uses the word "compassion" to identify virtue rooted in good will, generosity and love for others. Hume found kindness in many performances such as friendship, charity, compassion.

David Hume is a British empiricist and believes that all knowledge comes from the senses. He opposes the existence of the original concept and points out that humans know directly only what they are experiencing. These statements had a major impact on his argument for the existence of a miracle. This article explains this discussion and critically evaluates it. In the Hume Study of Human Understanding, "Section X" miracles violated the laws of nature "to define and debate like miracles", and the determination of experience has enacted these laws "1. I proceed as follows: First, I will respond to Humes' claim of miraculous beliefs. Next, I present some conditions and the conviction that a miracle will happen is correct if it matches. Discussions on miracles in Hume's work can be divided into three categories. The first argument attacked the consistency or clarity of the concept of magic. The second accepts to demonstrate that the concept is coherent, but it is reasonable for miracles there was not enough evidence to believe the miracle. The third attacked the reliability of the report from those claiming to have witnessed a miraculous event. There is no room to cover many discussions against the existence of God, but there are other arguments that are easily pointed out. Miraculous arguments especially provide reasons why it seems supernatural elements to say, or more discreetly provide a reasonable skeptical naturalistic view of reasons to provide special events have started. This discussion attracts the attention of many philosophers, especially the refusal of miracles of David Hume. The main content of the discussion is how to explain the principle of evidence, the most uncommon historical events to understand the laws of nature to define miracles Hume did a series of arguments for belief in miracles, but his main points are as follows. I believe that reports of miracles are impossible, as these reports are always offset by strong evidence of nature's law. For example, suppose a mayor and city official witnessed a true miracle. As they reported, the car crashed to the town hall, leading to the collapse of the wall, but after a few seconds all the bang bang walls are floating in the air, reassembled as before. Should we trust their report?

David Hume, together with Hobbes and Rock, is considered to be one of the three major British Empires and lives at the end of enlightenment. The Catholic Church is losing control of science, politics and philosophy, Aristotle's view of the world is swallowed by a more mechanical perspective. Galileo found that the theory provided by Copernicus is correct, that is, our earth is not the center of everything, but the celestial body, including the earth, is hovering under the sun. There are many mathematicians. Philosopher David Hume is a pioneer of this view. Hume does not regard morality as a rational company. He thinks the reason is dominated by emotion. Of course, our moral decisions are summarized and presented for reasons, but for Hume these reasons are objective, but they are not only guided by specific emotions, they are sometimes brought about by them. If morality is how we deal with each other, why so many ancient texts put too much space in the rules of menstruation? Explain that these laws are neither rational nor health related. (Why are you Kosher, are not most Grasshoppers?) It seems to me that disgust is the principle of more promising interpretation. Like Hartley and Smith, David Hume (1711-1776) combines moral emotional explanations with utilitarian virtues. The third part of Hum's "humanity theory", more generally, the argument of morality in the investigation of moral principles attempts to answer the inner questions about the meaning of good, righteousness, justice, and virtue It is. People and behavior, men psychologically praise and nurture morality at the expense of their own interests, rules that can be used to judge moral disputes and to support judgment on others. Hume has a clear and good meaning on these topics but his argument shifts carelessly from one problem to another, especially from semantic problems to motivational problems, and to the transformation of moral semantic theory did. Nursing ethics was originally developed as an alternative to Kant's morality and utilitarian moral theory, but it is thought to relate to many other moral theories such as African ethics, David Hume's sentimentism, Asia, etc. I will. Richmond 's Virtue Ethics, Merlot - Ponty' s Phenomenology. , Levinas Ethics and Confucianism. The most important of these comparisons is the relationship between nursing ethics and virtue ethics, but nursing ethics is sometimes classified as a kind of virtue ethics, care is central virtue. Identification of virtues promotes a tendency to classify nursing ethics as virtue ethics, but this classification system is universally accepted.

Max Black and Humean's skepticism This article claims that there is really a problem only when Humean's induction problem gives a strange and impossible definition of "rational". I will first explain what it is I will understand Hume's induction and try to enrich problems related to my affair. Then I will study the problem solving proposed by Max Black and explain where the solution is useful and why it is ultimately unconvincing. In the latter case, I call Wesley Salmon's work and try to solve the problem raised by Salmon. It is this if Hume emphasizes these conceptual contradictions is a unique aspect of his skepticism and if any part of his philosophy can be called "Hume skepticism" it is this . But during his writing he changed his view on the essence of these contradictions. He initially felt that these contradictions are limited to the theory about the outside world, but as explained here, the theory of the mind itself will not be affected by them. Or, more precisely, their speculation, including contradiction and absurdity. But since the perceptions of the mind are well known, I've always considered all the possible thoughts in making a conclusion about them, so I will always skip these discrepancies. Max Black and Humean's skepticism This article claims that there is really a problem only when Humean's induction problem gives a strange and impossible definition of "rational". I will first explain what it is I will understand Hume's induction and try to enrich problems related to my affair. Then I will study the problem solving proposed by Max Black and explain where the solution is useful and why it is ultimately unconvincing. In the latter case, I call Wesley Salmon's work and try to solve the problem raised by Salmon. In George Schuler 's 1931 novel "Black No Longer", Dr. Junis Croukmann developed a revolutionary process that allows blacks to become white. After being rejected by a white woman, Max Disher has become one of his first clients. Black Max becomes a white mat. He married Helen, invaded the white supremacist organization, ran away from Europe for several million dollars. At the same time, as more and more blacks become whites, black leaders lose power and the United States loses cheap labor. This country is confused. Then, I found that 'new' white can be identified because it is lighter than 'primitive' white. Therefore, the United States has abandoned the concept of white dominance, but on the contrary, everyone wants to purchase a cream that makes the skin darker. Now, black becomes beautiful. Ironically, Schuler explained the absurdity of racial discrimination.

I rarely know the first day I arrived in Michigan, but the idea of ​​knowledge in modern universities is mixed with the ideas of Deweyan and Humean. Looking back at Michigan's courses and activities, this became clearer. For example, universities are proud of continued efforts to promote progress and improvement of society as a whole. Michigan is concentrating on statements that growth itself is the only moral goal (Dewey 177). Below we outline the understanding of the essence of Dewey's knowledge and individual learning process, and how Dewey education at the experimental school actively participates in the barrier, to train individuals who change their circumstances and the environment Indicates whether it is designed. I asked Dewey to try to make the students understand the next part of the common social goal. The learning described in this section arises from exchanges with others in social "natural" environments, but it does not necessarily focus on common projects and collaborative work Individual abilities It is designed to draw out. In fact, Mr. Dewey said, "In order to obtain data on the actions that we can take, it is necessary for the school to be too heavy, especially in the early stages, the school is overweight" I pointed out. Other restrictions - quoted in Mayhew and Edwards, 1936, pp Defending the epistemological concept that obviously opposed Dewey's democratic democracy is rooted in the concept of social epistemology arising from the pragmatism of Charles Pierce. His research on controversial theory and informal logic also shows a practical trend. In self-recognition: Practicalism is not constrained, advocating "perfect practicalism", "naturalization of society and culture", and we propose the characteristics of our relationship to the society and culture in which we live We can change it to the world. And it is not just a matter of slightly changing the content that makes up their arrangements and beliefs. " Siegel's two-element theory of critical thought embodies or almost proves the concept of Hume's rationality tool. First pointed out why Siegel 's theory is at least psychologically resting, then pointed out more specifically that the concepts of Sigel himself, ie the tool concept, influence the theory of his critical thinking . As mentioned above, the concept of the cause of critical thinking is made up of two aspects: a causal assessment element and a critical mental element. Due to the proper movement of the reasons, the reason requires not only the strength of evidence but also normative influence. The separation of this logical cognitive dimension from the reasonable motivational dimension reflects the distinction between Hume's 'rational' and 'passion' fields. The double intellectual structure of Siemel repeats the binary structure of Hume

The definition of virtue and copy virtue of "Utopia", "Bible", "Othello" varies from culture to society. The concept of utopia's virtue does not necessarily agree with the views of the Bible and Elizabethan England, but more biblical records of the "utopia", the Genesis of Joseph and Jacob, and Shakespeare's "Othello" presented It has been. At the concept of excellent virtue it seems that vice can overcome virtue, but eventually the poem presents superior quality based on different definition of virtue. When more utopian virtues and rational side-effect rationality penetrate society, it does not necessarily imply greater happiness. If there is a degree of rationalization, or if there is an error in the analysis used for inference, reason often has an adverse effect. On the other hand, rationality can have overwhelming positive impact on society when it is carefully analyzed and correct conclusions are drawn out. - H. G. Wells H. G. Wells' book "Modern Utopia" The book of modern utopia was published in 1905. This book seems to have two unique features. As Wells says, from the perspective of "white and plump man" he calls it "sound" (1). The definition of virtue and copy virtue of "Utopia", "Bible", "Othello" varies from culture to society. The concept of utopia's virtue does not necessarily agree with the views of the Bible and Elizabethan England, but more biblical records of the "utopia", the Genesis of Joseph and Jacob, and Shakespeare's "Othello" presented It has been. Compare the controversy over the years, with the controversy between Canada and the United States about Canada and the United States - a concept of good virtue. Canada and the United States are mysteries, the two countries are home to millions of people living in a relatively comfortable and healthy environment. We are all citizens, with the help of each other, and with the help of other countries. However, Canada has its own identity of cultures and customs, fun complexities of government and heroes. Both Hume and Kant regard the concept of virtue and vice as the core of human morality. But they differ in the basic nature of virtue and they present a catalog of different specific virtues and vices. Kant's argument reflects his consistent emphasis on freedom, dignity, rationality and motivation. Hume reflects emphasis on utility, happiness and social nature unique to his thought of humanity. Correspondingly, the concept of internal struggle is extremely important to Kant's story and Hume explains the pursuit of virtue in a relatively loosely harmonious way. Therefore, Hume seems to be more accustomed to the essential bourgeois virtue to successfully participate in modern business and political society (see EPM 9.1.2). In contrast, Kant is more vigilant about the social impact on individuals and seems to strongly insist that Rousseau resists the need to call for power.

in · duc · tive · l · adverb · duc · tive · ness, noun · ti · in · adjective · ti · in · duc · tive · l · adverb · ti · in · duc · tive · ness noun · in · duc · Tive, adjective · i-in · duc · tive, adjective · in · duc · tive, adjective Collins English Dictionary - Full and complete 2012 Digital Edition © William Collins Sands & Co. Corporation 1979, 1986 © HarperCollins Publishers 1998, 2000, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2009, 2012  - Inductive reasoning, also called recursive logic or induction logic, is an inference that constructs or evaluates inductive theory. It is usually interpreted as a generalized inference form based on individual case. In this sense, it is often in contrast to deductive reasoning. However, philosophically, the definition is subtle than a simple advance from a particular / individual instance to wider generalization. On the contrary, the premise of the inductive logical argument shows a certain level of support (inductive probability) of the conclusion, but it does not mean it, that is, they mean the truth but do not guarantee the truth. In this way it is possible to transition from generalization to individual instances. Induction refers to "general rule or principle inference method from observed specific conditions" (Flew 171). The method of induction reasoning can be regarded as the main means to prove the relationship between evidence and specific hypothesis (Norton 2). In this sense, induction processes will occur as long as evidence supports the hypothesis and can not determine its speculative certainty in this process. It is this expression of the induction method that enables the first mystery. Next is the main argument of the above mystery suggested by David Hume. The development of induction was always the secret of mystery expression and solution. In the early stages of its development, it was the secret of an old recursive mystery discovered by Hume. But after the previous mystery was solved, Nielsen Goodman discovered a new inductive mystery. Instead, this paper chooses to use the development of induction as the definition of Hume 's and Goodman' s induction concept. Induction refers to "general rule or principle inference method from observed specific conditions" (Flew 171). The method of induction reasoning can be regarded as the main means to prove the relationship between evidence and concrete hypothesis (Norton 2)

Borges summary of the idealist defender Borges explicitly explained Berkeley and Hume as real "defender of index and idealism" in Nuevarefutacióndeltiempo. According to Borges, this doctrine is actually "old" and "popular" as a metaphysical one. But his argument stands for a unique philosophical achievement. Borges himself insists on these claims and exceeds them. He pushed the doctrine of Berkeley into Hume, which in turn flowed into a unified idealistic sea conceived by Schopenhauer and Oriental philosophy. Borges believes in understanding ideas and things through imagination. He is a metaphysical relativist, meaning "reality exists in the eyes of a bystander". Borges studied the story of Trond and compared idealism and materialism. Because they do not believe things, Tlonians do not use nouns in their language. First and foremost, the object must be an idea. If Tlonian wants to check my profile, they will tell me that the chair is an idea in my head and is not genuine. "Their language and derivation of their language is based on idealism." In this rich story, several important topics have been developed. One is an idealistic theme, which reveals the disciples of Borges as a philosophical system built by Berkeley and Hume - argues that thinking is the only true measure of reality. In the world of "Tlon" which is an ideal perfect configuration, things do not exist outside the concept of existence. Another theme of the interaction between reason and absurd appeared in several stories that humans try to understand the reality around him by imagining the world based on perfection of his own perfect form I will. Like the "Babel Library", this universe is always like a contradiction and a maze of reality: its secret and hidden secret, its guardian is ignorant, its limit is infinite. Therefore, seek perfect understanding and perfection to make people enter the ridiculous world

William Paley's "Discussion from the design" questions about the clock and questions about why the watch is there and how the watch is made there. He said that there must be a creator to visit. There are creators in those with designs, and creators have never seen a work. A place to wake up, a place that does not work at all. William Paley (William Paley, 1743-1805), one of the philosophical arguments about the existence of God, known as argument of design argument theory, is the most widely discussed matter of discussion. Pale, evidence advocates believe that there are signs of obvious design in natural order. It seems that things not only exist but are designed for some purpose (McGrath 2011, p. 183). But British naturalist Charles Darwin (1809 - 1882) strictly compromised the reliability of the Paley method (McGrath 2011, P73) and provided another explanation for this surface design in nature, In the 1800s, British philosophy and moral philosopher William Perry wrote a paper entitled 'Discussion from Design'. In the "design controversy" Perry tried to prove the existence of hegemony by developing special arguments called theoretical arguments. The theoretical argument is a discussion of analogy based on the similarity between two different themes. In this article, intentionally trying to break Paley's argument, as follows: First, introduce the basic purpose theory argument pearly, secondly, arguments were analyzed with Paley derivation. Third, contact with Paley's argument Discussion about the existence of God of William Perry and David Hume is called theoretical argumentation or design theory. Discussion from design is an argument about the existence of God and the existence of certain creator based on the idea of ​​order and purpose in the universe. Hume adopted a method against design argument, Paley defended it. Both Hume and Paley are making very strong claims, but we will reach the conclusion to distinguish which philosopher is taking a stronger position.

David Hume raised doubts about the world's knowledge with the option of "skeptical about the behavior of understanding." This problem is related to induction problems. David Hume was one of the first people to decide to analyze this problem. He begins to choose by providing a form to split human knowledge and then discusses its dependence on reasoning and experience. According to Mr. Hume, people believe that the future will be similar to the past, but there is no evidence to support this belief. In this article we will clarify the form of knowledge and reasoning and consider Hume 's induction which is a difficult problem for justified explanation of truthful beliefs. This division is also called "break fork". The relationship of thinking is deductive, "intuitive or performance decision" and can be found only by simple thinking maneuver "(Hume, 1748, p. 422). This group can include mathematical ideas and mathematical proofs. For example, 2 plus 2 is 4 statements. Therefore, it is unthinkable to negate these sentences, and it is logically impossible. For example, we can think of a triangle, and we all know that it has three sides. Later, since the rectangle becomes a rectangle, you can imagine a rectangular triangle and immediately face conflicts. This is a priori as it is irrelevant to the outside world and does not give us any information about the world at all. The second is the "de facto problem" after. "Facts" are words for us to understand the world and the sources of knowledge of these words are "the present evidence of our senses" and "our memory record" (Hume, 1748, p. 423). The statement of this group and the denial of these statements are not self-contradictory and can not be imagined. For example, we can say that the next house is yellow, this statement can be thought of as correct, but at the same time can be treated as false and imagine that their house is blue 2018 8/6 Philosophy / logic - inductive my thesis on recursive length questions Inductive thesis: 1208 words (35 double space pages) Evaluation: carefully selected papers open the choice of document preview 'skepticism Target. All of this can be explained by the concept of natural contradiction, proposed as a solution to the problem of recurrence in the philosophy of science. The concept is just a philosophical treatment. Philosophy (Greek, philosophy, literally from love for wisdom) is a regressive argument about the situation of general and fundamental research doubting the requirements of knowledge. The induction problem is basically a problem of what we can learn from experience, understanding induction problems is the main reason to understand Hume's philosophy, and the problem is how people explain It is related to what to do. Why are philosophers interested in computational complexity? Scott aaronson abstract Since philosophy has changed linguistics into abstract propositions, if we learn that something can be computed, we can assume that the philosopher of today The problem faces David Hume. The problem is a bit different, and it has become an epistemological question justifying the true belief about the proposition.

Western subjective thinking has become one of the basic contents and major achievements of Western philosophy since modern times. It faced a lot of difficulties in the development process and was declared "already dead", but I think its development prospect is still bright. Historical development of Western subjective thinking The term "subject" comes from the Latin "subject", which means what forms the basis of the preceding or other thing. It refers to the process of production, the process of production, the process of invention, and the place called "west". What I call "westernization" is to create historically specific illusions where members imagine themselves as Westerners. Therefore, there is a hypothetical feature in the creation and formation of this Western theme. However, the imaginary nature of this position does not mean that it is not true, but it constitutes a significant effect by constructing the body of that subject (Ye_eno_lu 1999: 3) Beginning from the origin of Western philosophical thinking, people became interested in moral law. As Mr. Hume pointed out in this paper, "morality is the theme that makes us happy" (David Hume's "Humanity Theory"). First, the idea of ​​how to live is the problem of having the most satisfying life, "Beauty of managing the relationship between one person and another" (JB Schneewind, "Modern Moral Philosophy ") Focused on. But having a lifestyle perspective is best for everyone. As the title of the article insists, Hume's theme is humanity. He summarized his project in the subtitle: "I am trying to introduce experimental methods into moral subjects." As mentioned at the beginning of the initial survey, he defined "philosophy of morality" as "human science". EHU 1.1 / 5)). Hume 's goal is to apply scientific methods to human research. A study on the "system" of Hume's philosophy confirmed him that philosophy was in regret and that reform was urgently needed. At only 18 years of age, he was dissatisfied with a letter saying that anyone familiar with philosophy noticed that it was involved in "endless controversies" (HL 3.2). Ancient philosophers he was paying attention copied the mistakes made by their natural philosopher. They advanced the theory of "complete assumption" and rely on "invention rather than experience"

Freud believes that most instincts come from two natural sources: "Love's Desire" (Life's Instinct) and "Tanatos" (Death Instinct). "Eros" includes the desire for love, creativity, and sexual desire (sexual desire). "Tanatos" is an impulse that uses aggression, sadism, and violence. Obviously, these are hidden in the unconscious mind. Self is control of identity, adjustment of libido, and super self control. There is no way to prove that Freud's psychoanalysis theory is true. Because people can not determine the level of mind, not to mention inference of human behavior, it is no longer a scientific theory but a hypothetical theory. In 1739, David Hume approached free will through his concept of causality in "humanity theory". His position is that a causal relationship is a psychological structure used to explain the repetitive association of an event and often leads to one close to each other (explaining the natural regularity) and the other It is necessary to investigate the relationship between them in detail. Things (things) cause or require other things). According to Hume, 'causal relation' is based on weak reason. "It is just a meaning to" have to bring B for their constant integration "leaves a very weak inevitable concept. " Invitation to salvation. "Free will is influenced by the nature of man, but men retain the ability to choose things that go against their personality and desire" ("free will"). Humanity must ultimately endorse the nature of their folly from God. Man uses the place God gave them in the beginning. Adam and Eve ate a forbidden tree and forced a loving, elegant god to solve the problem. 1 Timothy 2: 3-4 says: "This is a good thing, whether fate and" free will "will influence our lives is still a very doubtful argument. Many people with religious views believe that having higher power has a pre-determined plan for each of us. What is our future? In the play, Oedipus, fate will be the determinant of life and determinants of Oedipus

But this is also a question to discuss the existence of God. People like me can not choose to believe something that does not prove their existence. I can neither expect nor expect anyone to dedicate their life to anyone who may be just a fairy tale. Likewise, there is no evidence that God exists, but there is no evidence that he does not exist. This is the reason I chose to believe that God is reasonable. The existence of God has been debated for thousands of years, and important discussions have been carried out. Believing that God is reasonable is another story, just as God confidently believed in himself, this topic brought a lot of debate. It is one thing to discuss whether God is true or not, and it is another matter to discuss whether it is reasonable to believe that God is reasonable. There may be no convincing evidence or evidence that God exists, but I believe it. Blaise Pascal believes that believing in God is not based on appealing evidence of the existence of God but believing in God for our benefit. Reward, and if he is not, we will rarely or not at all. On the contrary, if we do not believe in God, if he exists, we will receive unlimited punishment in hell, and if he is not, then we will receive little or no Hmm. "Whether you gain unlimited reward in heaven or you get little or no loss", even if there is no evidence "accept unlimited punishment in hell, or get little or not at all" He believes that God is also reasonable. To be present Hume does not believe that God is "rational", he believes there is no convincing logic to support the existence of God. He seems to appear during a gentle agnosticism - I may not have God - I am not convinced - and a secondaryism - there is a God, but it does not make a big difference to me. But retaliatory thought of God - he does not believe he is in it, so prepare to punish the world after death - he thinks that it is a cruel superstition. The center of Hume is that religious beliefs are not products of reason. Therefore, arguing or opposing it based on the facts does not mention the core problem. It seems particularly ridiculous for Hume that trying to persuade someone to believe or not to believe that there is a completely polished discussion. This is why he is the most important defender of the concept of religious tolerance. The apostle Paul tells us that God to prove the existence of God does not believe it to be reasonable or rational. In Romans 1:20, he writes that no one excuses not to believe in God, since all creations declare his people. - Historically excellent thinkers and people with revolutionary ideas have changed the world of understanding. The Renaissance people such as Vesalius, William Hervey and Paracelsus revolutionized the understanding of medicine through anatomy and ongoing learning. However, these people have not changed easily, Christian churches are established in their own way and do not want change. People who died for unknown reasons and the church have no answer

The pursuit of life, freedom, and happiness is an indication that everyone should enjoy basic freedom. The fact that people have reasoning abilities requires autonomy. Inference will help the world move towards an ideal society. We claim that humans are independent from other animal species using reason. Because he can choose his own way of life, human thought creates all the differences. However, this natural gift brings negative factors that everyone must face. For philosophers like Spinoza and Emmanuel Kant, "freedom of speech" means freedom of knowledge to participate mainly in exchange discussions opened. In 1784, five years before the French Revolution, Kant argued that "freedom to openly use their reasons" is a basic and equal right of everyone or citizen. Likewise, when Mill wrote "freedom" less than a century ago, he defended freedom of speech, defended the "Freedom of Thought and Discussion" as an individual and pursued the truth. To these thinkers, the freedom of equal isigoria is still essential, but their attention is not limited to actual remarks, ie participation in solving and discussing other physical actions, reasonable psychological exercises and ideas and arguments We will move on to the exchange of. , Often printing There are two kinds freely. Freedom (negative freedom) and freedom (positive freedom). The division of freedom into this binary framework can be traced back to Kant, which he at least described in detail in his 1941 work "Escape from Freedom" at Isaiah Berlin's 1958 paper "Two Freedoms". It is known for concepts and explores Charles Taylor more modernly. These philosophers and thinkers often use these two different freedoms to discuss and discuss the role of government in civic life. But today, we would like to explore ways to think about the difference between freedom and freedom. It will help us to better understand our personal development and travel from boys to men. Kant has many reasons to believe that freedom is essential to morality. First of all, freedom is essential for moral responsibility. For example, when we are responsible for personal behavior against accusations, we avoid "such behavior" and "condemn" to condemn the individual against not properly exercising this ability To do. "We must judge that judgment of condemnation is based on the law of reason, that it can treat it as ... and should judge that the behavior of the person is not the cause" (A 555 / B 583). Second, Kant believes that "moral law immediately determines the will" is essential for moral behavior (Proverbs 5:71). As Hume said, if the will of a man must be required by her situation and experience, the moral law requires that Hume respond appropriately because it requires that Hume does not support pure thought and motivation It is impossible. This is the true cornerstone of Kant's moral thought (Guyer 2000: 203)

Descartes doubts experiments and mathematical abstracts: Descartes considers mathematical propositions to be doubtful. Because he believes that all beliefs are derived from perception and examples of questions about the existence of substances. The problem is not to "calculate the actual object or the sky image", but it means "to calculate the amount". Given Descartes' early works, it is possible to see the proposition 2 + against him. 3 = 5 'And' I think so, so I '', this argument is equal Descartes, Hume and skeptical Descartes are in charge of skepticism known as Descartes. Hume criticized this skepticism in his "investigation on human understanding." After discussing Descartes' suspicion, he proposed another type of skepticism that he thought he was more philosophically effective. Hume correctly explains Descartes' suspicion, is his skepticism better? Descartes introduced general skepticism to philosophy. If we believe that what is regarded as "knowledge" must be accepted as information and justified in order to be accepted. Skepticism doubts the verification of knowledge and I doubt how it came to such a conclusion. This is the main problem of skepticism Before deeply living, we need to define the term Descartes skepticism and Cartesian logic. Descartes's skepticism and doubt are derived from Descartes' Descartes and the point of skeptical debate is that we can not know the empirical allegation (Apple etc.) because there is a possibility that we might be deceived is. It has existed in the world for many years and is known by history and colonial companies. Even today, the problem is a form of racial and biopolitical problems in our world. Colonization and colonization and the concept of the difference between the two (another person is human and the other is partial) At first glance, this looks like a clearly defined question. To speak frankly, we can only judge the first person's experience. Cartesian skepticism, fully proposed by Descartes, is remarkably related to perceptual people simulated in the virtual environment. The person performing the simulation is basically a Descartes devil. If you feel that you may be simulating, the only thing you can not suspect is your subjective first person's experience. I want to know what Descartes meant when I talked about his important introduction. As background, I discovered an important part of the Cartesian heritage; Descartes doubts - casts doubt on everything you know. In today's world, this idea seems to be very old-fashioned. We tend to question everything within the scope of skepticism. For Descartes, doubt is the opposite of reason. Descartes' suspicion has made scientific progress possible over the past 200 years. The medieval society believed that humans existed because God wants them to exist. Descartes does not doubt the existence of God, I doubt that the existence of man is God's desire. He has a problem because he proved the existence of God using a series of theorems. He proved that thought is the essence of thinking

Historical development of self-conceptualism The development of self-concepts or self-concepts can be traced back to the era of classical philosophy that Hattie (1992) followed. Self-awareness is related to the identity, individuality and self-awareness of Greek philosophers such as Plato and Aristotle. In addition, the philosophers of the Renaissance promoted feelings "self" and "knowing self" as the foundation of existence through discussion. Hume (1711-1776) shifted from the mainstream of intellectuals and rejected the idea of ​​a unique and stable self-concept, but emphasized the superiority of "self-recognition" and the superiority of experience as a source of constant change . In order to learn this theory, first you need to understand the history of the development of self-conceptual theory. The earliest milestone in self concept theory was Rene Descartes. And it suggested that the existence of a person depends on the way he sees it. Sigmund Freud is one of the most famous psychologists and advocates a number of theories to talk about our inner psychological processes. In his theory, we are considered to have three main aspects, id (happiness oriented), self (balance between id and superego), and super ego (led conscience). Historical development of self-conceptualism The development of self-concepts or self-concepts can be traced back to the era of classical philosophy that Hattie (1992) followed. Self-awareness is related to the identity, individuality and self-awareness of Greek philosophers such as Plato and Aristotle. In addition, the philosophers of the Renaissance promoted feelings "self" and "knowing self" as the foundation of existence through discussion. Hume (1711-1776) shifted from the mainstream of intellectuals and rejected the idea of ​​a unique and stable self-concept, but emphasized the superiority of "self-recognition" and the superiority of experience as a source of constant change .

Discussion on the design theory of the existence of God is a posterior theory. The term distance learning comes from the Greek word "teleos". This means a purpose or an end. This is based on the view that there is evidence of design in the world because natural order suggests opportunities more. So, this shows a designer's idea. Classical discussions on design have three premises to be concluded. The universe has order, law and purpose. Discussion of the design theory of existence of God is also called a teleological controversy, I believe that the universe is not just a coincidence opportunity, but to do it. This is God. This discussion is a vision because it is thought that the observation of the natural world has the conclusion of the designer. The belief that the universe is designed by God is caused by things like the four seasons, summer, spring, fall, and winter, this year is changing. Design controversy is an empirical argument against the existence of God. These arguments are made by inferring the existence of God as the best interpretation of these features, trying to identify the various empirical features of the world which usually (but not always) constitute the evidence of intelligent design. Because the concept of design and purpose is closely related, design argument is also called a theoretical argument and includes "terror", "target", or "purpose" in Greek. Discussion about the existence of God of William Perry and David Hume is called a theoretical argument or design theory. Discussion from design is an argument about the existence of God or some sort of creator based on thought of order or purpose in the universe. Hume took the way to oppose design arguments, and Paley defended it. Both Hume and Perry discuss very strongly, but in the end it will conclude to distinguish which philosopher has a stronger position.

Perhaps Oklahoma's William is best known for his metaphysical nominalism and 'Okkam's razor'. William of Oakham was born between 1285 and 1287 and soon was named Spade in Surrey, England. Since historians know little about Occam's birth and childhood, we must infer the date by writing from events in his life. He is a medieval British philosopher and a Franciscan monk. In Occam (Beckert) Franciscan family, Occam estimated the past few years as a young age. William of Occam, also known as William O'Cham, William of Occam, is a British philosopher of the 14th century. Historically, Occam has become an outstanding opponent of Thomas Aquinas (1224 - 1274). Comprehensive and accused by the Catholic Church. Aquinas and Okam are different in most problems, but there are many other critics in Aquinas, and Occam does not criticize Aquinas like any other person. But for fairness, Occam was the power of great change at the end of the Middle Ages. He is a brave man with a very sharp mind. His philosophy was extreme in his era and continued to provide insight into the current philosophical argument. In academic philosophy Occam's William insists on the method and content of reform, but its purpose is to simplify. William had included some of the previous theologians, in particular most of the work of Duns Scotus. William of Oakham from Duns Scotus came up with his view of sacred total tolerance, his view on grace and defense, his epistemology, and most of his moral beliefs. But he also prescribed his understanding of universality, his reactions to Scots on the formal distinction (ie "applied to creation"), and the simplicity he admits and repented ing. It is the opposite. Ockham Razor An attractive similarity between William Okamem and David Hume, such as the general view of causality. Answer: Occam Hume's David Hume William did not deny a causal relationship. He accepted it. However, he says that empirical methods can not logically prove their necessity. For Hume, causality is what human beings naturally believe.

Free articles available online are great, but they do not follow the guidelines for your specific writing task. If you need a special term paper on religion: What is religion, you can hire professional writers to write high quality genuine paper for you. Free papers can be tracked through Turnitin (theft detection program), but our custom document passes the theft test. Our writing service saves you time and results Another attack on the disclosure of religion appeared in Hume's article "Natural History of Religion" (1757). This is one of the first systematic attempts to explain the reasons for religious belief only in terms of psychological and social factors. You may think that "natural history" is the answer to this challenge, like the attack on Hill's "miracle" by William Adams: so far this person's religion and law are the wisest It may have surpassed people. Religious and legitimate heathens are perfect and complete in their first childhood; will become complete when many human improvements are found to have grown and matured after many improvements? In this article, Hume provides innovative naturalistic discourse for the cause, influence and historical development of religious beliefs. Hume believes that the first polytheism is the earliest religion of mankind and it positions the origin of religion in emotions, especially hope, fear and desire to dominate the future. He further argues that monotheism arises from competition among religions. Because the believers distinguish their gods from all competitors and expand the gods until everything is completed. Although the monotheism which enlightened is reasonably protected than superstition polytheism, in fact polytheism has many advantages. Hume, in particular religion of monotheism is often more tolerant and hypocritical, to expand the intellectual absurdities and to foster socially unpopular "virtues of monks" such as humiliation, decline, passive pain I think that it will be connected.

In his survey of moral principles, Hume provides a number of virtues and qualities that are valued for four reasons: they serve individuals, serve society, are privately friendly, or are beneficial to society. One of the qualities revealed by Hume is justice. However, according to Hume, this quality is only being evaluated for its usefulness, it has not been evaluated for anyone's tolerance. Hume explained his position. Hume imagines scenes that are all accessible and easy to obtain. Hume's main moral sentence is the third volume of his humanitarian discourse, "ethical" (Vol. 2, "in passion"), the quest for his moral principles, and some of his essays is. To some extent, an ethical investigation reinterprets the central idea from the ethical part of the essay in a more meaningful way; however, there are some important differences. The ethical position and discussion of this paper are as follows, show the place where the ethics survey coincides, then discuss the difference between the survey and this thesis. A study on Hum's morality began with a paper and refined in his "Exploring the Moral Principle" (1751). His view of morality is that "verbal decision is based on moral sentiment". It does not know how to manage ethical behavior, but about feelings. The moral sentimental rhythm of Hume's morality is shared by his best friend Adam Smith, but Hume and Smith are moral reflections of their former contemporary Francis Hutchinson. It is generally affected. Peter Singer argues that Hume's argument can not have rational grounds only with morality. It is enough to give him a position in moral history. This is a carefully selected collection of philosophical works including Hume 's (a) prose, morality, politics, (b) philosophical articles on human understanding, (c) research on moral principles, (d) political discourse. A paper from four papers (1757) was added to the later version. The paper is not included in this series. The book originally included "suicide" and "the soul was not dead", they were deleted at the end of the last and appeared as an unauthorized version in 1783. Four of the four papers were later added to various sections of "Themes of Papers and Papers"

In "Exploration of Human Understanding", David Hume first contrasts two aspects of human reasoning, two aspects of moral philosophy, or human science (Hume 1). On the one hand it focuses on shaping human behavior and on the other it focuses on rationality. The first one is simple and obvious, the others are difficult and accurate. Hume shows that a simple and obvious philosophy appears more in mediocre life; it allows humans to become more benign and encourages emotions. Hume is an experientist and skeptical. His philosophy of development is usually approached by scientists, so he believes that he can make laws for human understanding. Hume studied understanding as an experientialist and tried to understand the origin of human thought. Empiricism is the concept that all knowledge comes from experience. Skepticism is to investigate things to find things that lead to personal reasons or those that feel particular emotions without knowing what is in nature in advance. Objectively speaking, there is a delicate boundary between reasoning and people's feelings, but philosophers Immanuel Kant and David Hume seem to have a big difference in views on this issue. Both are philosophers who change their lives, and they have different views. One sees the emotions of humanity, while the other seems to be seeing rationality. Understanding philosophical anthropology One way to find ways to understand the essence of humanity by considering different methodological approaches is to think of two questions: "What is a human?" And "Who am I "Various answers are given, but the most famous philosophical definition is still a classic definition proposed by Aristotle. The essence of man is "animal of reason".

Definition of miracles Miracles can be precisely defined as a violation of the natural law by the specific will of God or by inserting an invisible agent. David Hume "Miracles are a favorable coincidence and their natural causes are too complicated to understand." The miracle of George Santayana is a wonderful event thanks to the Oxford English Dictionary of several hypothetical supernatural institutions. In my opinion, miracles are incidents that can not be explained by scientific reasoning, so we do not understand why and how it will happen. Here, Hume defines the miracle as "a violation of the law of nature", but the miracle of the footnote is referred to as "an intangible agent who violates the law of nature through the specific intention of God or the intervention of specific people" Define 'exactly'. The definition is more relevant, the second is to better capture the concept of miracles. In a letter written in Blair in 1761, Hume said he always has religious content as an empirical fact. "I have never read a miracle in my life" (L1, letter 188). Therefore, Hume's miracle is all that is required by taxonomy for incompatibility with the laws of nature, but it violates the laws of nature caused by non-natural substances. Explain or define a miracle; a miracle is a violation of the laws of nature, not ordinary for most people. When Hume said: "Nothing is considered a miracle, if it happened in a common process of nature, then he will explain this very clearly. A man that looks healthy will suddenly die It is not a miracle. "Hume, p. 888) Hume said that this death is abnormal, but it seems to happen naturally. If it dies, he can only define it as a true miracle. To explain the criticism of Hume's miraculous belief, you must first understand the definition of miracles. The Webster Dictionary defines the miracle as follows. Actions, supernatural events considered to be one of the actions of Christ, his divinity reveals that it is a very noteworthy performance or event, unexpected luck. . Therefore, this miracle is based on the perception of the experiences everyone is experiencing. It is based on the individual's reality and the belief he believes. It is based on internal events like what we teach and external events like direct information we heard or seen.

Elvis Aaron Presley was born in a two bedroom house in Tupelo, Michigan in the humble circumstances on January 8, 1935. His twin brother Jessica Long died and Elvis became a child. He and his parents moved to Memphis, Tennessee in 1948 and Elvis graduated from Hume High School in 1953. Elvis. The influence of music was pop music of the time and country music at that time, gospel music he heard at church, gospel he often attended, and he absorbed historical building street as a teenager in Memphis. Elvis Presley was born on Gladys Love Presley (née Smith) in Tupelo, Michigan on January 8, 1935, and his father, Vernon Elvis Presley, has created a shotgun room for two rooms. Jesse Gallon Presley, his identical twin brother, was sent 35 minutes before his death. Presley has a close relationship with his parents and has a particularly close relationship with his mother. The family attended the church of God's assembly where he found his first musical inspiration. On his mother's side, Presley's ancestors were Scottish Irish and French Norman. Gladys and other families clearly believe that her great-grandmother morning pigeon is Cherokee; the biography of Elaine Dundy supports this idea, but at least one pedigree researcher in many ways I asked a question. Vernon's ancestry was German or Scottish. Gladys is regarded as a family member from relatives and friends. Elvis Aaron Presley was born on January 8, 1935 in East Tupelo, Michigan, born in Née Gladys Love Smith and Vernon Elvis Presley. He has stubborn twin brothers. In 1948, Elvis and her parents moved to Memphis, Tennessee, where he went to Hume High School. In 1953, he took part in a high-level dance with the present girls Regis Wilson. After graduating from Memphis High School, Elvis served Royal Electric film guide and truck driver. He began singing "The Hillbilly Cat" locally, then contracted with a local record company and signed with RCA in 1955. The story of Elvis Presley's wonderful life started on January 8, 1935. Elvis · Aaron · Presley was born in Vernon and Gladys · Presley in Miss Tupper. Luo's 2 bedroom house. His twin brother, Jess Galleon, who died grew up from Elvis as a child. He and his parents moved to Memphis, Tennessee in 1948, and in 1953 Elvis graduated there from Hume 's High School. In 1954, Elvis started his career in Memphis's legendary San Record brand. At the end of 1955, his recording contract was sold to RCA Victor. By 1956, he was an international sensation. That sound and style uniquely combines his diverse musical influences, blurred and challenged the social and ethnic barriers of that era, and created a new era of American music and pop culture.

Credit - computer translation by statistical machine translation of Google, Microsoft, Systran, Worldlingo Samai KA sadupayog boht zaroori Ocean. Hume Samai KA sadupayog Karna chahiye. Samai boht kimti Yasuda hai.Samay EK burgerya TOH Phir wapes nahi aata.Samay KA sadupayog Hi tech fume gi van my safalta KI ore Le JATA hai.Samay kabhi kisi KA intazaar nahi karta.Samay KA sadupayog karne KE LIA Hume Samai sarini (timetable ) BANA KAR uske niyamanusar chalna chahiye jisse humara jevan anushasan SE chalta ocean. Samai KA Hamesha sadupayog Care AUR KHA JATA High swasthya sharir I HI swasthya mastisk KA Niwada Yasuda Ocean khel sarir KO HAST pust AUR Thunder bnane KA sadhan HIZZI van I swasthya KA bhut mahatva Hi AUR swasthya KE liye khelo KA apna bhut mahatva hai no jab khiladi mydan khelne utarta Sea is usa Romulum pulkit HO uthata Sea is bhed bhav nahi Yoda khel KO SiRF company manornjan TAK Hi-tech simit nahi rakhna chahiye balki EK lakshya BNA naphthalene SE nischit Hi-tech saflta milti Heidi van I khelo KA bhut mahatva Yasuda Sea isliye HAR vyakti KO kiss my bassa KE nam khel kisi NA kisi khel me bhag zaroor rena chahiye her khel KA APNE apna mahatva Yasuda sea KHAS KER vidyarthiyo KO shiksha KE Sattsut khelo I BHI bhag レ ナ avasyak hai's log kehte Hi KI kheloge kudoge Nawab gaunt banoge the ocean kharab AUR padhoge's likhoge to banoge Paddle padhne KE liye mastishak KI zaroorat J = high AUR swasthya mastishak khelo SE HI Yasuda ha khelne SE Samay KI barbadi nahi was HoTI khelo SE anushasan BHI ATA high isliye khelne BHI zaroori high

Design theory about the existence of God Theology can regard the existence of God as absolutely necessary based on authority, belief or discovery, but many philosophers know that God must exist by reason I believe it is possible to prove. Telelogical discussion is also known as a design argument and merely states that designers must exist because the universe and living creatures display design elements in their order, consistency, consistency and pattern. As long as the shooter does not order it, insist that things of the world move toward the target so that the arrow hits the target. Discussion of the design theory of existence of God is also called a teleological controversy, I believe that the universe is not just a coincidence opportunity, but to do it. This is God. This discussion is a vision because it is thought that the observation of the natural world has the conclusion of the designer. The belief that the universe is designed by God is caused by things like the four seasons, summer, spring, fall, and winter, this year is changing. Design controversy is an empirical argument against the existence of God. These arguments are made by inferring the existence of God as the best interpretation of these features, trying to identify the various empirical features of the world which usually (but not always) constitute the evidence of intelligent design. Because the concept of design and purpose is closely related, design argument is also called a theoretical argument and includes "terror", "target", or "purpose" in Greek. Discussion about the existence of God of William Perry and David Hume is called a theoretical argument or design theory. Discussion from design is an argument about the existence of God or some sort of creator based on thought of order or purpose in the universe. Hume took the way to oppose design arguments, and Paley defended it. Both Hume and Perry discuss very strongly, but in the end it will conclude to distinguish which philosopher has a stronger position. One of the traditional themes of natural theology is the existence of God, one of which is discussion from design and theoretical arguments. Discussion is that the existence of God can be proved by an obvious design in the complexity of the world. EncyclopædiaBritannica says, "This is most popular for the most accessible theoretical reason ... it deduces sacred designers and determines the evidence of design in nature.The coherent facts as a whole In this view, the same functional system also shows the wisdom of God behind it. "

Morality has played an important role that is not always recognized in defining ethics. Principles are often virtues that apply only to society and can be distinguished from law, religion, or morality. Morals in a definite sense may differ from each other, depending on the foundation of the society that asserts that morality. Different societies have different understanding of the meaning of moral priorities. When others concentrate on practice, their ethics can be based on purity and honesty. Many philosophers encourage morality. Because it usually prevents and avoids harm to the society that forms a particular group. The most interesting ethical concepts appear in the question of whether to show more. Due to our human nature, we have certain moral obligations - painful or happy experiences, our family restrictions, or these approvals or disapprovals. In a survey of his moral principle, Hume said: "The end of all moral speculation is to teach ourselves our own responsibilities, and through the proper expression of bad habits and virtues, Let's avoid us and hold one more hug. "(Hume, p. 177). Philosophers are not trying to imagine human rationality and scientific behavior like Descartes but are trying to explain human facts. He compiled these facts into a very general principle even if it was small. By doing so, he found reasons why people approve or oppose some moral behavior. Hume's philosophy as a whole is based on verification of humanity. And his knowledge from sensory experience and exam. Hume believes knowledge comes from experience and observation, even in physical or mathematical competitions. But moral judgment depends on passion and emotion to define approval and disapproval. Hume has a fairly positive and natural view of the moral judgment in Hume's theory, that is, moral sentiment. Approval and disapproval must be tied together by feelings and emotions. If morality comes from emotion, There are many definitions of the essence of philosophical exploration of morals and ethics. Moral or moral philosophy is the quest for the morally valuable and ordered nature of behavior, that is, the nature of how human behavior should be. What is this (moral condemnation) coming from? Morally speaking, the most basic question sounds like "What is the ultimate benefit for us to fight?" "Why do you choose this behavior instead of others?" This moral dilemma? "Should not morally do good behavior and should not take morally correct action?" "Finally" Why do we act ethically? "Or" Why do we want morality? " Ethics, also known as moral philosophy, is a field of philosophy focused on research on correct questions, false questions and how we should live. Morals include making moral decisions about right or wrong, good or bad. Whether it is true or wrong is the quality or moral judgment we give to our behavior. Ethical research has three areas of meta ethics including methods, language, logical structure, and reasoning to explain ethical terms. Moral or moral philosophical research can describe the theory of whether it is right or wrong systematically. Moral philosophy is usually divided into three categories: meta ethics, applied ethics, normative ethics. Meta - ethics studies our moral values ​​of where languages ​​and principles came from, and what they mean. And provide a practical solution to ethical problems. Normative ethics studies ethical standards that influence legitimacy and fraud. The theory of normative ethics includes utilitarianism, consequentialism, contractileism, virtue ethics, and so on.

ELVIS PRESLEY "Well thought out woman" Elvis Presley desperately played the guitar and sang for the microphone. Elvis Aaron Presley was born on January 8, 1935, Miss, Tupelo. His parents Vernon and Gladys are poor peasants with a strong religious background. They grew up in Elvis' Tupelo where he learned how to sing and develop guitar playing skills. There were not many friends who grew up when Elvis was a child. His best friend is his guitar, he chose him when he was 11 years old. When Elvis was 13, his parents moved him to Memphis, Tennessee, where he went to Hume High School until 1953. Elvis Presley was born on Gladys Love Presley (née Smith) in Tupelo, Michigan on January 8, 1935, and his father, Vernon Elvis Presley, has created a shotgun room for two rooms. Jesse Gallon Presley, his identical twin brother, was sent 35 minutes before his death. Presley has a close relationship with his parents and has a particularly close relationship with his mother. The family attended the church of God's assembly where he found his first musical inspiration. On his mother's side, Presley's ancestors were Scottish Irish and French Norman. Gladys and other families clearly believe that her great-grandmother morning pigeon is Cherokee; the biography of Elaine Dundy supports this idea, but at least one pedigree researcher in many ways I asked a question. Vernon's ancestry was German or Scottish. Gladys is regarded as a family member from relatives and friends. Elvis Aaron Presley was born on January 8, 1935 in East Tupelo, Michigan, born in Née Gladys Love Smith and Vernon Elvis Presley. He has stubborn twin brothers. In 1948, Elvis and her parents moved to Memphis, Tennessee, where he went to Hume High School. In 1953, he took part in a high-level dance with the present girls Regis Wilson. After graduating from Memphis High School, Elvis served Royal Electric film guide and truck driver. He began singing "The Hillbilly Cat" locally, then contracted with a local record company and signed with RCA in 1955. The story of Elvis Presley's wonderful life started on January 8, 1935. Elvis · Aaron · Presley was born in Vernon and Gladys · Presley in Miss Tupper. Luo's 2 bedroom house. His twin brother, Jess Galleon, who died grew up from Elvis as a child. He and his parents moved to Memphis, Tennessee in 1948, and in 1953 Elvis graduated there from Hume 's High School. In 1954, Elvis started his career in Memphis's legendary San Record brand. At the end of 1955, his recording contract was sold to RCA Victor. By 1956, he was an international sensation. That sound and style uniquely combines his diverse musical influences, blurred and challenged the social and ethnic barriers of that era, and created a new era of American music and pop culture.

There are two main thoughts or methodologies on the subject of epistemology: rationalism and empiricism. These two completely different schools of thought are trying to answer philosophical questions about how to acquire knowledge. Rationalists believe that this process is entirely within our head, but experientists believe that it will be achieved through sensory experience. After reading and understanding each discussion it is clear that empiricism is the most relative descriptive position in epistemology. Empiricalism is an excellent position in discussions of empiricism and rationalism. Renedecart supports rationalism. That is acquiring knowledge by reason. David Hume supports empiricism and knowledge after experience through experience. Both positions have strong debate. Descartes warns that "something is genuine, I do not understand it is such thing." Descartes believes that it is necessary to "assure that rationality is used for everything" in order to obtain true knowledge. Hume, on the other hand, believes that the connection of ideas is our knowledge. He explains this empirical approach, using three principles of relationship between ideas, ie similarity, time or place continuity, causality. Hume believes that we associate these ideas in our mind with the ideas we gained through experience. Essay.com/a Thesis using direct citation of Hume and Descartes to demonstrate positivism against rationalism For a long time philosophers have intensely discussed the classification of philosophical epistemology into two categories: rationalism and empiricism. We believe that empiricism can acquire knowledge only by observing facts or by experimenting, but rationalism gains knowledge through logical reasoning. Rationalism and empiricism are themselves a very viable way of thinking in philosophy, but the arguments of these philosophical schools become more powerful when combined. Then, please argue, rationalism and empiricism, sum. The fact that philosophers can be rationalists or empiricists was traditionally used in the classification system commonly used in the history of philosophy, especially Kant's description in the first half of the 17th to the 17th century It affects the classification system. . Therefore, Descartes, Spinoza, and Leibniz were erroneously regarded as applying rational core epistemology to a common metaphysical agenda, Rock, Berkeley, and Hume erroneously reached a gradual rejection of their metaphysical claims It was regarded, and everyone consciously tried to improve his predecessor's efforts.

Evaluation of the behavior of Telémakhos writers and poets in ancient and contemporary literature praises the behavior of the hero and accuses the actions of evil people - judging this is a praiseworthy act from virtue understanding. If our biggest story is not a confrontation between the opponent and the hero, it is contrary to the struggle of respect and fight of evil. In ancient literature, our understanding of good deeds comes mainly from Aristotle. Because the way of virtue is the middle position, it is "excess and defect middle" (Aristotle 1220). Behavior Utilitarianism includes a two-step moral evaluation system. (1) to select a specific action, and (2) to evaluate behavior by appealing to general well-being. For example, according to behavioral utilitarian, it is wrong for me to steal a neighbor's car, as this special action leads to more general misfortune. However, rule utilitarianism includes intermediate stages, therefore it is a three-step moral evaluation system. (1) selecting a specific action, (2) evaluating the behavior by relying on moral rules, and (3) evaluating by Moral rules call for standards of general well-being. For example, according to the rule - Utilitarianism, stealing a neighbor's car is wrong. Because this violates the anti-theft rules, we support antitheft rules to promote general happiness Scottish-Irish philosopher Francis Hatcheison (1694-1747) proposed a systematic formula that ties morality to happiness. The standard purpose of moral evaluation is "quality", or feature. (As we saw, for Hume, the evaluation of behavior comes from the assessment of essential qualities that we believe to have produced.) Typical moral judgment looks like the kindness or laziness of a certain person Some kind of characteristic virtue or bad habit. For Hume, personality traits are a psychological tendency and usually include a tendency to feel a specific emotional or emotional combination that causes the owner to take action. We will either agree or disapprove by thinking about someone's characteristics in a selfless manner from a common viewpoint and therefore achieve moral judgment. Thus, moral perception is the observer's favorable mood caused by the observer's sort of motivational emotion. Thus, moral perception is a tendency toward emotions or a tendency towards emotions. What is the moral evaluation of Hume's perspective? The four main explanations have important text support. First of all, as we have seen, the non-propositional view is that Hume does not state any proposition, expression or fact, mentality evaluation thinks evoking emotion or itself is emotion itself . , Bricke). (Hume asserts that the more accurate form of this interpretation allows moral evaluation to have some propositional content, but those basic features as assessments are non-propositional.) Feelings or feelings of the audience is that she thinks about features and actions from a common point of view. In terms of tendency, when a particular trait is said to be good, we attribute this trait to a trend attribute that causes approval.

Thomas Robert Malthus was born in Dorking in southern London in 1766. He is the second son of Daniel Malthus, a supporter of Jean-Jacques Rousseau and David Hume. He has seven brothers and sisters, one brother and six sisters. When I was young, Malthus was moved by the thought of Rousseau and Hume and was deeply influenced. His father and various mentors educated him before entering Jesus College in Cambridge in 1784. His main subject is mathematics, he studied many subjects, won the Latin and Greek awards, and graduated in 1788. Thomas Robert Malthus Thomas Robert Malthus is one of the most controversial figures in economic history. His reputation derives primarily from the demographic theory closely related to his name. Contrary to the view of the latter half of the eighteenth century that it is possible to raise people's living standards, Malthus believes that such improvements lead to population growth and therefore to reverse these benefits. Malthus also said that (rather than thinking that the economy can experience high unemployment rates over the long term) (rather than thinking that economics should be experience, not deductive science) than theoretical theory Thomas Robert Malthus was born in February 1766 near Guildford, Surrey. His father succeeded at home and accepted Thomas' s education. Malthus then studied at the University of Cambridge and received a master's degree in 1791. In 1793 he became a researcher at Jesus University in Cambridge. In 1805, Malthus became a professor of history and political economics at the University of East India Company in Hailey Berry, Hertfordshire until his death. Malthus became a member of the Royal Society in 1819, two years later was appointed a member of the political and economic club, including David Ricardo and James Mill. In 1824, he was elected as one of the royal family members of the Royal Literature Society. Malthus also co-founded the London Statistics Association in 1834. Thomas Robert Malthus died on 23rd December 1834 Thomas Malthus, Thomas Robert Malthus, (1766 13 February, the UK Surigord near Roquery, died in 1834 December 29, St. Catherine, Bath, is best known in the summer his theory, the UK economy near the scholar and Seth is demographers, population growth tends to exceed the food supply, and without strict breeding restrictions, human improvement is not possible. this idea is often called the Malthusian. Malthus was born to a wealthy family. his father is skeptical David Hume of friends philosopher, Jean-Jacques Rousseau has been under the influence of his book Émile (1762) is about to educate the son it might be a source of liberal thought. young Malthus, until he enrolled in Cambridge, Jesus College in 1784, was educated in most of the time home. So he is the many subjects And research, was awarded the Latin and Greek awards, I graduated in 1788.

Discussion about the existence of God of William Perry and David Hume is called theoretical argumentation or design theory. Discussion from design is an argument about the existence of God and the existence of certain creator based on the idea of ​​order and purpose in the universe. Hume adopted a method against design argument, Paley defended it. Both Hume and Paley are making very strong claims, but we will reach the conclusion to distinguish which philosopher is taking a stronger position. Hume also advocated a discussion to support and oppose the purpose of the argument in his dialogue on natural religion. The role of Cleanthes summarizes the theoretical argument that compares the universe with an artificial machine and derives a conclusion based on the principle of similar effect and similar reasons that must have wisdom of design. It turns out that it is a wonderful machine fragmented into countless machines. Also, we recognize again that the degree of fragmentation exceeds the range that can be interpreted by tracking human's senses and abilities. These different machines, even their smallest part, can be adjusted precisely to each other, and everyone who takes it into account is admired. In nature as a whole, the adaptation of means curiosity to purpose is completely analogous to human design production; human design, thought, wisdom, and wisdom Modern argumental arguments are somewhat different from the construction theory of Paley. Paley is particularly impressed with the design of biological systems such as eyes and animals, but contemporary editorials often find evidence of design in physics. Modern discussion tends to focus on the "fine tuning" of the universe, and indeed it is the fact that in order to support life ("fine tuning") it is necessary. One of the advantages of contemporary design theory compared to Paley is that it is less susceptible to attack based on evolution theory. From the perspective of Paley, people oppose the evolution that explains the emergence of biological designs, but the evolutionary process does not apply to the laws of nature.

Final Article: Inductive Problem Inductive reasoning is the idea of ​​drawing conclusions from multiple facilities. There is a tendency to understand specific concepts to achieve ideas by building details from prior knowledge. However, this learning method has limitations. We are not always aware of specific concepts, so not all conclusions can be derived from what we know. Also, not all facilities are consistent, so there is no room to draw conclusions about the future. That is an induction problem. David Hume introduced the induction problem to the world. Induction problems argue that past experiences can bring future experience. In this article I will explain how induction problems bring more problems to philosophers, but how to bring undue solutions. Philosophers are creating new arguments. Many times these papers are challenged by other ideas. David Hume introduced inductive problems in the 18th century. He asked Hume is a pioneer of contemporary inductive research, but induction itself is a problem, and that is actually a lot of problems. Traditional problems are now a matter of reason: how can injustification be justified? In fact, here are some problems that correspond to various reason patterns. A very simple model is to regard Hume 's dilemma as a challenge, but in order to prove the induction method, it should show that it can draw real or possible conclusions from the real premise. It is safe to say that this problem should be solved without further assumptions and should not be resolved. The realization of this dead end and the diffusion of other forms of induction has resulted in more specialized projects including various enhanced premises and assumptions. The following methods show some examples of this Final Article: Inductive Problem Inductive reasoning is the idea of ​​drawing conclusions from multiple facilities. There is a tendency to understand specific concepts to realize ideas by building details from prior knowledge. However, this learning method has limitations. We are not always aware of specific concepts, so not all conclusions can be derived from what we know. - An important function that triggers science and everyday thinking is to understand the information available. Induction is a process from a specific one to a common one and derives a conclusion about the complex nature of the universe from a limited series of observations to the present day. People use a series of evidences gained through experience and use it to form conclusions that are considered to be consistent with the given facts

For a long time philosophers have intensely discussed the classification of philosophical epistemology into two categories: rationalism and empiricism. We believe that empiricism can acquire knowledge only by observing facts or by experimenting, but rationalism gains knowledge through logical reasoning. Rationalism and empiricism are themselves a very viable way of thinking in philosophy, but the arguments of these philosophical schools become more powerful when combined. Empiricalism is an excellent position in discussions of empiricism and rationalism. Renedecart supports rationalism. That is acquiring knowledge by reason. David Hume supports empiricism and knowledge after experience through experience. Both positions have strong debate. Descartes warns that "something is genuine, I do not understand it is such thing." Descartes believes that it is necessary to "assure that rationality is used for everything" in order to obtain true knowledge. Hume, on the other hand, believes that the connection of ideas is our knowledge. He explains this empirical approach, using three principles of relationship between ideas, ie similarity, time or place continuity, causality. Hume believes that we associate these ideas in our mind with the ideas we gained through experience. Essay.com/a Thesis using direct citation of Hume and Descartes to demonstrate positivism against rationalism Rationalism is often contrasted with empiricism. In fact, these views are not mutually exclusive. For example, the philosophy of science is rational and empirical. But knowledge is basically based on experience if you think that the end of the experience comes from experience through five external senses or through inner feelings like pain and happiness. Similarly, some plausible versions argue that starting from the basic principle like geometric axioms, all possible global knowledge can be deduced derived. The philosophers who discussed this point are Spinoza and Leibniz, and efforts to solve epistemological and metaphysical problems raised by Descartes brought about the development of a subjective approach to rationality. Spinoza and Leibnitz believe that, in principle, at least all knowledge including scientific knowledge can be obtained only by rationality.

This kind of argument is practical to predict the pattern of repeatedly occurring events, but they are never valid. Please think of sunrise. It lasts thousands of days every day. So it will rise tomorrow. This possibility is very high, but it is not 100% likely. Also think about the existence of the universe itself. The probability of life arising from the fusion of random forces is very low, but the correct combination of life exists only once. In the 1800s, British philosophy and moral philosopher William Paley wrote a paper entitled "Theory from Design." In the "design theory", Perry tried to prove the existence of superiority by developing a special theory called the teleological theory. The theoretical argument is an analogical argument based on the similarity between two different themes. In this article, we are intentionally defeating Perry's claim and trying to adopt the next method. Contact Us Discussion about the existence of God of William Perry and David Hume is called a theoretical argument or design theory. Discussion from design is an argument about the existence of God or some sort of creator based on thought of order or purpose in the universe. Hume took the way to oppose design arguments, and Paley defended it. Both Hume and Perry discuss very strongly, but in the end it will conclude to distinguish which philosopher has a stronger position. In Paley 's debate about the existence of God, "design argument", Paley tried to use his argument to prove that God is the sole designer and creator of the universe. He compares the universe with the watch and compares God with a clockmaker. In this discussion, Paley argues that the universe is quite complex and orderly so that only wise wisdom can design and create it. Paley believes that everything that shows design can be inferred that it is actually an intelligent design product. For example, if you look at your watch, you can confirm that it is designed in one of two ways. If a person checking the clock has experience using the watch earlier, it can be said that it is actually designed. If smart design marks are displayed on the watch, such as smooth surfaces and unique complex parts, you can guess the smart watch. essay.com/Paley vs. Hume This is an inductive argument about the origin and nature of God, religion, the universe. Paley vs. Hume This is an inductive argument about the origin and nature of God, religion, the universe.

In the first premise of the first part of the tenth, Philo notes that the highest God who can establish society the only way to realize religion and longevity needs some form of union did. Philo is classified as a skeptic and insists that through human emotions there is God's idea that does not prove existence and they do not use the system to have a true testimony of sacred intervention of higher intelligence. Unbounded order determines what needs to be sufficient for religion; however, in order to achieve this ideology, some kind of humanity (anthropomorphization) is necessary. Dialogue on nature religion (1779) was taught after his death by his nephew David Hume the Younger. The argument between the three fictional figures about the essence of God is an important depiction of the design controversy. Despite some controversy, most scholars believe that Philo's view is closest to Hume's view, and Philo is the most skeptical of the three. Hume's greatest achievement in religious philosophy is a dialogue on natural religion, which is often considered one of the most important and influential contributions to this philosophy field. Hume's books were all controversial, but his conversation persuaded him to prohibit publication before publishing that the conversation was very exciting. Hume's philosophical project and the way he developed to do it will determine the strategy he adopted in all discussions. Discussion on causality and ethics has a preliminary critical stage in which Hume evaluates the discussion of contemporaries with his predecessor and then evaluates the constructive stages he develops his position . But in natural religious discussions the situation is quite different. Dialogue on religion in natural dialogue and religious dialogue is a literature on Scottish philosopher David Hume's philosophy. This publication is consulting with three characters: Demea, Philo, Cleanthes, the essence of religion, and the existence of God. They all agree that God exists, but there are differences in nature and attributes, and they can gain understanding of God. One of the things they are talking about is the reason for the design for the existence of God. Hume started writing dialogue on religion in 1750, but it was not completed until 1776 before he died. Publications are based in part on Cicero's publication "De Natura Deorum" (in the nature of the gods). After death in 1779, a dialogue on religion came to Hume.

Indigenous son's naturalism and determinism "Today's big Thomas and its thugs are strangers but they hate them because they are afraid they do not know the reasons they are blind It is an incompetent pawn that exercises social power in a way. "This sentence reflects the most radical influence of the criminal racial discrimination situation in the United States. However, perhaps the most important role of this part is that it embodies the overall philosophy of light naturalism or social realism. Perhaps the most important argument about naturalism and free will is Peter Strawson's 1962 paper "Freedom and Resentment" which transforms the subject from its truth or free will of determinism into its Hume's argument. Rational "truth" which is completely independent from determinism. Or free will paper. This is, of course, a resting position, as we abandon the natural beliefs and there is no reason to bring sympathy for others, feelings of appreciation and resentment. Surprisingly, this famous Strawson article mentions only about Hume. This is a footnote that Hume denied "reasonable" induction. Therefore Mr. Stawson said that according to the so-called reaction attitude, there is no reasonable denial of moral responsibility. This discussion led directly to the subcompatibility of John Martin Fischer. Strawson is a "pessimist" - a true moral skeptic - a ranking for "optimist" - clearly compatible - and I want to harmonize them. Would you like to read this article? Or are you bound by the laws of nature? David Hume described the problem of free will as "the most controversial issue of metaphysics". The initial investigation of this ideology created several philosophical views supported by contemporary thinkers. The deterministic view is based on strict causality theory and denies the concept of free will. On the contrary, liberalism opposes this and supports the notion of free will and denial. The position that everything about us can be attributed to the laws of nature and the environment of our predecessors is called determinism. There is a philosophical controversy about compatibility (or incompatibility) between determinism and free will. Whatever this philosophical argument, if reliability is true, everything about us is ultimately beyond our control. There are two general correspondences to this problem. Firstly, some people reject the principle of control to maintain the way we do ethical evaluation.2 Secondly, we change the way we do ethical evaluation and maintain the principle of control To make it

Dialogue in "Pride and Prejudice" Jane Austin's "Pride and Prejudice" becomes a reality through dialogue. Some people can not stop the conversation, others spend considerable time saving languages ​​when it is necessary to express emotions. Dialogue of 'pride and prejudice' is different from Shakespeare 's role in theater, characters have long monologues, conversation is more conversational, very witty and clever. There are few people who start a wide range of lectures. And there is no chapter dedicated to explaining every physical characteristic of everyone. Cady Davis Bradshaw ENG 261 Dancing in the dialogue of "pride and prejudice" on October 9, 2014. In "Pride and Prejudice", Elizabeth Bennett and Darcy changed dramatically their attitudes towards each other. Darcy is dedicated to Elizabeth, but she denied this because of its low rank with the family. Elizabeth believes that Darcy is arrogant and interferes. Through the dialogue of these characters, they discovered real concern for each other. - David Hume is a Scottish philosopher living in the 18th century. Hume is now at the turning point of philosophy by infamous skepticism. He insisted that he was a moderate skeptic, but all philosophers later felt the result of his argument. His criticism has influenced various themes that Hume seems to eradicate. One of the themes that Hume attacks against his argument is the concept of individual identity. Dialogue in "Pride and Prejudice" Jane Austin's "Pride and Prejudice" becomes a reality through dialogue. Some people can not stop the conversation, others spend considerable time saving languages ​​when it is necessary to express emotions. Dialogue of 'pride and prejudice' is different from Shakespeare 's role in theater, characters have long monologues, conversation is more conversational, very witty and clever. - Martin Buber's "I and You" provides a philosophy of private dialogue as it explains how personal conversations explain the real features. The theme of this book is that people can explain the outline of life by tending to talk to each other, nature and God. According to Buber, people have two attitudes. Me - you, or me - it. I - you are the subject - the subject relationship, and I - it is the subject - subject matter

On January 8, 1935, in Tupelo, Mississippi, Elvis Aaron Prestley was born into a wonderful couple named Vernon and Gladys Presley. He brought a lot of happiness to his family. In 1948, Elvis and her parents moved to Memphis, Tennessee and graduated from Hume High School in 1953. At the time of pop music and country music, he heard all the nights sang at the church with gospel music and night gospel, and as he was a Memphis teenager who was absorbed in the historic building street, R & B is the influence of Elvis Presley. Elvis Presley was born on Gladys Love Presley (née Smith) in Tupelo, Michigan on January 8, 1935, and his father, Vernon Elvis Presley, has created a shotgun room for two rooms. Jesse Gallon Presley, his identical twin brother, was sent 35 minutes before his death. Presley has a close relationship with his parents and has a particularly close relationship with his mother. The family attended the church of God's assembly where he found his first musical inspiration. On his mother's side, Presley's ancestors were Scottish Irish and French Norman. Gladys and other families clearly believe that her great-grandmother morning pigeon is Cherokee; the biography of Elaine Dundy supports this idea, but at least one pedigree researcher in many ways I asked a question. Vernon's ancestry was German or Scottish. Gladys is regarded as a family member from relatives and friends. Elvis Aaron Presley was born on January 8, 1935 in East Tupelo, Michigan, born in Née Gladys Love Smith and Vernon Elvis Presley. He has stubborn twin brothers. In 1948, Elvis and her parents moved to Memphis, Tennessee, where he went to Hume High School. In 1953, he took part in a high-level dance with the present girls Regis Wilson. After graduating from Memphis High School, Elvis served Royal Electric film guide and truck driver. He began singing "The Hillbilly Cat" locally, then contracted with a local record company and signed with RCA in 1955. The story of Elvis Presley's wonderful life started on January 8, 1935. Elvis · Aaron · Presley was born in Vernon and Gladys · Presley in Miss Tupper. Luo's 2 bedroom house. His twin brother, Jess Galleon, who died grew up from Elvis as a child. He and his parents moved to Memphis, Tennessee in 1948, and in 1953 Elvis graduated there from Hume 's High School. In 1954, Elvis started his career in Memphis's legendary San Record brand. At the end of 1955, his recording contract was sold to RCA Victor. By 1956, he was an international sensation. That sound and style uniquely combines his diverse musical influences, blurred and challenged the social and ethnic barriers of that era, and created a new era of American music and pop culture.

These examples are automatically selected from various online news sources to reflect the current usage of the term "guidance". The views shown in the examples do not represent the views of Merriam-Webster or its editors. Please send feedback  - Inductive reasoning, also called recursive logic or induction logic, is an inference that constructs or evaluates inductive theory. It is usually interpreted as a generalized inference form based on individual case. In this sense, it is often in contrast to deductive reasoning. However, philosophically, the definition is subtle than a simple advance from a particular / individual instance to wider generalization. On the contrary, the premise of the inductive logical argument shows a certain level of support (inductive probability) of the conclusion, but it does not mean it, that is, they mean the truth but do not guarantee the truth. In this way it is possible to transition from generalization to individual instances. Induction refers to "general rule or principle inference method from observed specific conditions" (Flew 171). The method of induction reasoning can be regarded as the main means to prove the relationship between evidence and specific hypothesis (Norton 2). In this sense, induction processes will occur as long as evidence supports the hypothesis and can not determine its speculative certainty in this process. It is this expression of the induction method that enables the first mystery. Next is the main argument of the above mystery suggested by David Hume. The development of induction was always the secret of mystery expression and solution. In the early stages of its development, it was the secret of an old recursive mystery discovered by Hume. But after the previous mystery was solved, Nielsen Goodman discovered a new inductive mystery. Instead, this paper chooses to use the development of induction as the definition of Hume 's and Goodman' s induction concept. Induction refers to "general rule or principle inference method from observed specific conditions" (Flew 171). The method of induction reasoning can be regarded as the main means to prove the relationship between evidence and concrete hypothesis (Norton 2)

There is no universal truth written by Hume, "Become a philosopher; but in all philosophy, it is still a person" (QSD of Jones 351). This statement is more shocking to me than any other statement written by Hobbes philosopher to Hume or W. T. Jones' Hume. Even after all investigations of what we can know and how to know something and even after very well organized methods of Hume to test these things are practical and fundamental An empirical view on. Let's talk about universal truth before it ends. Is there such a thing? I think there are some universal facts - the truth should go beyond this messy middle; as a human being, we should all agree with the truth. This is a big problem, and this topic is widely written. Fear is not a brave reader, I am almost done - I did not take you to the path of universal political philosophy. But I really want to leave you an example that I think that I am a universal truth. I believe that everyone should be given basic human rights, ie before the law. (There are many others, but I have not written a book, so I started or stopped here.) However, this may also cause confusion. Referring to the Russian writer Aleksandr Solzhenistyn, he is a Communist critic: "Humans are born with different abilities, if they are free, they are unequal, they are unequal They are not free. " I chose the truth of the universe "The devil appears in various forms in human imagination." There are many examples of how the devil acts today. Some examples I use are certain types of black cats and music. How superstitions play a major role in how the devil appears. - ... When Hack and Jim were on the island, the yacht floated. They decided to plunder the ship to determine if there are available materials available. Although he found a man who died in the boat, he played the role of Hack's young guards very seriously and persuaded Hack not to see the "horrible" face of the dead. He did not want hacks to get hurt in a dead way. Huck knew this, but it also showed his concern for the father of a young Huck. The concept of innate concepts arises from the universal truth. Locke asserted that this universal truth does not exist and attacked this claim. Because nothing can be agreed generally. Traditional moral rules of "not killing people" are generally thought to be innate, but it is widely believed that people who believe that murder is not immoral, that is, human eating is in the world . The idea is very common, but it is not universal. Even if there is a fact that everyone agrees, it is not enough to prove that it was born - this can be explained by considering the existence of children

From the beginning, the community suffers from problems caused by past human understanding. As a more sophisticated, principle belief in the existence of God during driving, to explain this confusion, the human form about their existence. Over time, excellent social, academic members have proposed several ideas of a unique understanding of complex topics like God. Students who have learned to endure the challenges of time and the theoretical explanation of these theories have been highly evaluated by this century's leading scholars. Discussion about the existence of God of William Perry and David Hume is called theoretical argumentation or design theory. Discussion from design is an argument about the existence of God and the existence of certain creator based on the idea of ​​order and purpose in the universe. Hume adopted a method against design argument, Paley defended it. Both Hume and Paley are making very strong claims, but we will reach the conclusion to distinguish which philosopher is taking a stronger position. God tried to use his argument to prove that God is the only designer of the Creator and the Universe with the Paley argument about the existence of "design argument". He looks at the universe and compares it with a clock maker to which God compares. In this discussion, Perry insisted that the universe designed and created it, only extremely great wisdom, very complex and orderly. Paley believed that everything would appear that the design can guess that it is actually an intelligent design product. If you look at the watch, for example, it is possible to decide one of the two method designs. If you had experience before people checked the watch to see, they can say that it is a good design. If the watch showed intelligent design marks, such as smooth surface or unique complex parts, you can guess some of the smart watches again Hume vs. essay.com/Paley This is the induction argument about origins and the nature of God, religion and the universe Hume vs. Paley This has arguments of induction about the origin and nature of God, religion and the universe St. Thomas Aquinas, who knows the existence of God, uses the argument argument as one of the five ways that William Paley's most quoted argument is. Perry likened the watch to the universe and many of the parts ordered adjustments to achieve several objectives. Watch complexity, meaning intelligent design as order and purpose, he means the complexity of the universe, and the purpose of order also means its intelligent design. As he suggested, he built its argument and is an analogy argument

Whether the emotions have ethical significance. The ethical meaning of emotion is potentially a huge and difficult topic. There are several positions that can be maintained: 1 moral judgment (positive or negative) can not be reasonably composed of emotions. 2 Emotions, like actions, are praised or condemned for morality. 3 Emotions are accoliated or condemned by morality, but they are completely different from the way they behave. 4 Emotions are key players of value, and rationality is purely instrumental ("rationality is a neutral technique to value"); therefore, moral judgment depends on your own emotions and yourself You should focus on your emotions correctly. There is an ancient philosophical argument as to whether morality is a matter of reason or emotion. Modern psychologists agree that moral decision-making requires rational and emotional judgment. As Professor Paul Thagard points out in the article on this issue, "When people express strong support or opposition to various actions, moral judgment is often very emotional, they are also reasonable. It depends on whether cognitive evaluation as part of emotion has been completed. " Philosopher David Hume is a pioneer of this view. Hume does not regard morality as a rational company. He thinks the reason is dominated by emotion. Of course, our moral decisions are summarized and presented for reasons, but for Hume these reasons are objective, but they are not only guided by specific emotions, they are sometimes brought about by them. If morality is how we deal with each other, why so many ancient texts put too much space in the rules of menstruation? Explain that these laws are neither rational nor health related. (Why are you Kosher, are not most Grasshoppers?) It seems to me that disgust is the principle of more promising interpretation. Humans are very emotional creatures and our emotions are easily developed by the logical thinking of the cloud. When people are attractive to feelings, they try to use logical arguments to stimulate emotional reactions. That's why we pay high rates for weddings, holy Valentine's Day and something like a baby. It can react to positive and negative emotions to achieve the desired response. Observation: Because we live in the era of huge digital distraction, it may be headline news. This example is based on actual blog posts that cause fear by project failures and speculators losing money. If we leave it there, we will remember the feelings of fear that may affect future judgment. In this example, no logical discussion or evidence supporting the stated in the title is provided in the content.

Discussion of the design theory of existence of God is also called a teleological controversy, I believe that the universe is not just a coincidence opportunity, but to do it. This is God. This discussion is a vision because it is thought that the observation of the natural world has the conclusion of the designer. The belief that the universe is designed by God is caused by things like the four seasons, summer, spring, fall, and winter, this year is changing. Discussion of the design theory of existence of God is also called a teleological controversy, I believe that the universe is not just a coincidence opportunity, but to do it. This is God. This discussion is a vision because it is thought that the observation of the natural world has the conclusion of the designer. The belief that the universe is designed by God is caused by things like the four seasons, summer, spring, fall, and winter, this year is changing. Design controversy is an empirical argument against the existence of God. These arguments are made by inferring the existence of God as the best interpretation of these features, trying to identify the various empirical features of the world which usually (but not always) constitute the evidence of intelligent design. Because the concept of design and purpose is closely related, design argument is also called a theoretical argument and includes "terror", "target", or "purpose" in Greek. Discussion about the existence of God of William Perry and David Hume is called a theoretical argument or design theory. Discussion from design is an argument about the existence of God or some sort of creator based on thought of order or purpose in the universe. Hume took the way to oppose design arguments, and Paley defended it. Both Hume and Perry discuss very strongly, but in the end it will conclude to distinguish which philosopher has a stronger position. One of the traditional themes of natural theology is the existence of God, one of which is discussion from design and theoretical arguments. Discussion is that the existence of God can be proved by an obvious design in the complexity of the world. EncyclopædiaBritannica says, "This is most popular for the most accessible theoretical reason ... it deduces sacred designers and determines the evidence of design in nature.The coherent facts as a whole In this view, the same functional system also shows the wisdom of God behind it. "

The biography of Adam Smith Smith is one of 18th century Scottish moral philosophers who led to impulse modern theory and his work marked a groundbreaking and progressive method, this method gradually Replace fixed Aristotle's view on invisible hands: - § "Everyone, to make the community's annual income the same size as he is not generally intended to promote public interest We must make an effort, he just did not know to what extent it would be desirable to get to promote their own interests, and as well as many other situations, he is visible Not promoting his intention not purpose at hand. Nicholas Philipson's new biography, "Adam Smith: Enlightenment Life" (Ale; US $ 32.50) 2 · We have been very successful in trying to put Smith, let us look at this person, Pull it together How to be a little financial god feelings. Historian of the University of Edinburgh Phillipson, following Rothschild, revealed that Smith is more like a moral person than a marketer. He discovered a deeper emotional vein, but he used events and plots to activate his life, despite changing Smith to Lord mainly Byron. One is his close friendship with philosopher David Hume (his closest colleague and his greatest influence) and a less simple embrace of Hume's notorious atheism. It turned out that the real problem of Smith is not a matter of economists. How can we become more prosperous and poor people? Even if it is a question of a philosopher, what should I do? This is a modern question. Darwin's question: How do you find and unify the order of the world without God? Philosopher David Hume is an important early role in Scotland's Enlightenment Movement with Adam Smith in 1750. Hume has a major impact on the theoretical and Smith economies. Hume does not believe in causality - at least he can "see" the micro skepticism you cause - Smith also said that he is "an invisible economic mystery, invisible "I am looking forward to dinner instead of the butcher, winemaker, bakery's kindness, but I am interested in their interests," Mr. Smith said. writing. "We will not solve ourselves to their self-love, to their own human nature, our own necessities, but we will not tell them the benefits to them." It is very difficult, very Scotland, and Instead of the diameter of Calvinism. As we know today, it is not entirely a "free market economy". Myth is still unknown The 18th century economist Adam Smith's free market theory suggests that there is always a power supply to appease the demand, there is no invisible hand that can guarantee that no government does not exist . "We are not from the kindness to look forward to the butcher of the dinner, the baker's and the winemaker, but for their own benefit. Respectfully" Other promises of all other countries and countries and military alliances The best way to get rid of exotic countries to avoid open isolation policy. Historically, the feeling of the United States was strong. President Woodrow Wilson won the second paragraph in 1916 and is particularly prominent in international partnerships that will participate in the newly formed US, outside (outside) the United States (erroneously) outside World War I I promised. Prior to pilot Charles Lindberg at American First Committee, popular with outstanding performance, World War II, the committee attempted to stop US participation in the war

"It is far from giving power to viewers, not to competitors - These [realistic] performance ultimately achieve social and nonhumanitarian behavior, so the smallest common divisible maximum possible outcome It will be "(Sexton). Timothy Sexton's strict comments on real television may be a bit extreme, but they are a widely acknowledged view that real television is a major failure of society as a whole and the society collapses (or it is so) It is based on. Although real television may not be the most useful form of entertainment, I believe that the transformation of social norms from idol worship to self-propagation will create a real environment. I left a reference line from elementary school that should be one of his most famous quotes: "Because I said impossible, I told you the wrong things in some respects We must do it. " That word defines Holmes and everything else that Doyle and Watson have given us. As the passage of time continues, Rand Al Thor becomes a dragon's regenerator. Canon did not promote Holmes into the body of God. In the Victorian era, such movements will be heresy. But Holmes is indeed far beyond his contemporaries in Scotland. He became the most famous detective in Europe. The government from France to the Netherlands asked him. The pope personally asked for help. We know that he has repeatedly supported the British throne and government. His reputation spreads widely, both authorities and individuals are appealing to him. In the detective, his achievement is almost like God. You may have heard the famous quote of the philosopher RenéDescartes: "I think, so I am." This is a famous quote that summarizes his argument to prove his existence. It seems wonderful, but thinking is not enough to prove or accomplish the purpose. Be sure to act. Any action. Please give me feedback immediately. After all, we are material creatures. While constantly evaluating how the environment functions, the meat and blood of the nervous system A famous proverb is "I think myself." David Hume, an experientist, wants to explain knowledge based on non-theology. Hume believes that there is no a priori concept and that our concept is not born, but an experience derived from ideas. He believes that these ideas can be divided into impressions and ideas. He believes that human beings learn through impressions, and if there is no impression, then there is nothing to think about. Unlike Descartes, Hume is everyone's view

What is morality? This problem has bothered philosophers over the years. Is it possible to have a common ethical view? There are many questions surrounding the mystery of morality. They seem to promote every action we take. Our decision is based on right and wrong. But what exactly is it to judge what is right and what is wrong? Is this our reasonable consciousness? This is our emotion. This is a question that David Hume has been thinking about most of his life. What is the driving force of our actions? Hume's main moral sentence is the third volume of his humanitarian discourse, "ethical" (Vol. 2, "in passion"), the quest for his moral principles, and some of his essays is. To some extent, an ethical investigation reinterprets the central idea from the ethical part of the essay in a more meaningful way; however, there are some important differences. The ethical position and discussion of this paper are as follows, show the place where the ethics survey coincides, then discuss the difference between the survey and this thesis. A study on Hum's morality began with a paper and refined in his "Exploring the Moral Principle" (1751). His view of morality is that "verbal decision is based on moral sentiment". It does not know how to manage ethical behavior, but about feelings. The moral sentimental rhythm of Hume's morality is shared by his best friend Adam Smith, but Hume and Smith are moral reflections of their former contemporary Francis Hutchinson. It is generally affected. Peter Singer argues that Hume's argument can not have rational grounds only with morality. It is enough to give him a position in moral history. Hume's moral philosophy and his historical and religious work reflect his theoretical empiricism. In the investigation of Part 3 of this article and ethical principles, Hume defines moral judgment as a specific type of recognition that is consistent with promoting practicality or pleasant quality or behavior, and is recognized by most people. In his ambitious British history, Hume tried to completely transcend his predecessor by emphasizing attention to details, fairness, and wise attention. However, many critics pointed out that history is characterized by a strong prejudice against Hoggs, especially at the later curls, they are obsessed with the British attitude towards Scotland. Hume practices religious skepticism in works like extensive dialogue on "miracles" and natural religions.

Adam Smith talks about Adam Smith's law in his legal lecture by a biological mechanism that demonstrated the need for marriage. Although apparently similar, his view seems to be very different from the concept of modern labor distribution. Smith, more specifically, seems to investigate the comparative advantage between her husband and his wife by producing rights of inheritance, but they are not concerned about the importance of the clan. The foundation of Smith's claims on the necessity of marriage is rooted in children. In the same way, in the case of Adam Smith of his "law": "perfect right" and "perfect right" (19829) distinction between lectures, the former refused the right to demand us " When pointing, the latter should refer to "performance" to force others "to fulfill obligations and other corresponding responsibilities, but we can not force those to do their duties "A beggar is the purpose of our charity, it can be said that it is right, but it can be said that, if we use it appropriately like this, it is correct, but we corrected the word The general way to do is not the metaphor of meaning that we are the same as what calls the perfect right way and understanding it. Because they do not fall within the jurisdiction of the law, they are related to exchangeable justice. Inadequately referencing the right distribution right again. The former does not belong to law, right which we must consider, but a moral system. Although Adam Smith's work has been thought that his lecture on legal issues has a major influence on the work of long mirrors, we also believe that Hume, the latter method, for analysis of slavery Please note that it affected the methodology. The discussion of slavery Hume in his article "Country with ancient population" at the ideological level is essential for understanding the history of slavery (see Finley 1998). He paid close attention to the laws, speech and other texts of the ancient Greek and Roman society, history records the treatment of their women, and political leadership and child-rearing, employment, domestic and practice to political leadership and women It shows how the philosophical attitude of Millar brought about. Civil servant. In contrast, the slavery debate in the US far exceeds Adam Smith's anemia. About Hume as a mirror of some details they are different, affected moral evil slaves, abuses and inhuman slave owners are different.

In the 1800s, British philosophy and moral philosopher William Perry wrote a paper entitled 'Discussion from Design'. In the "design controversy" Perry tried to prove the existence of hegemony by developing special arguments called theoretical arguments. The theoretical argument is a discussion of analogy based on the similarity between two different themes. In this article, intentionally trying to break Paley's argument, as follows: First, introduce the basic purpose theory argument pearly, secondly, arguments were analyzed with Paley derivation. Third, contact with Paley's argument William Paley (William Paley, 1743-1805), one of the philosophical arguments about the existence of God, known as argument of design argument theory, is the most widely discussed matter of discussion. Pale, evidence advocates believe that there are signs of obvious design in natural order. It seems that things not only exist but are designed for some purpose (McGrath 2011, p. 183). But British naturalist Charles Darwin (1809 - 1882) strictly compromised the reliability of the Paley method (McGrath 2011, P73) and provided another explanation for this surface design in nature, In the 1800s, British philosophy and moral philosopher William Perry wrote a paper entitled 'Discussion from Design'. In the "design controversy" Perry tried to prove the existence of hegemony by developing special arguments called theoretical arguments. The theoretical argument is a discussion of analogy based on the similarity between two different themes. In this article, intentionally trying to break Paley's argument, as follows: First, introduce the basic purpose theory argument pearly, secondly, arguments were analyzed with Paley derivation. Third, contact with Paley's argument Discussion about the existence of God of William Perry and David Hume is called theoretical argumentation or design theory. Discussion from design is an argument about the existence of God and the existence of certain creator based on the idea of ​​order and purpose in the universe. Hume adopted a method against design argument, Paley defended it. Both Hume and Paley are making very strong claims, but we will reach the conclusion to distinguish which philosopher is taking a stronger position. Yet, in many cases, it is confused with the discussion of simple analogy, William S. Paley from the clockmaker's argument to avoid Hume against the analogy of the world and artifacts, a more complicated design It is an argument of. I need to check the clock and I find that I found a clock on the ground Paley's argument is that the similarities and part of the deliverables to the physical world, as a reliable indicator of intelligent design What is happening in that place, I hardly thought ... About what I know, the watch may have always been there.

In the first premise of the first part of the tenth, Philo notes that the highest God who can establish society the only way to realize religion and longevity needs some form of union did. Philo is classified as a skeptic and insists that through human emotions there is God's idea that does not prove existence and they do not use the system to have a true testimony of sacred intervention of higher intelligence. Unbounded order determines what needs to be sufficient for religion; however, in order to achieve this ideology, some kind of humanity (anthropomorphization) is necessary. Dialogue on nature religion (1779) was taught after his death by his nephew David Hume the Younger. The argument between the three fictional figures about the essence of God is an important depiction of the design controversy. Despite some controversy, most scholars believe that Philo's view is closest to Hume's view, and Philo is the most skeptical of the three. Hume's greatest achievement in religious philosophy is a dialogue on natural religion, which is often considered one of the most important and influential contributions to this philosophy field. Hume's books were all controversial, but his conversation persuaded him to prohibit publication before publishing that the conversation was very exciting. Hume's philosophical project and the way he developed to do it will determine the strategy he adopted in all discussions. Discussion on causality and ethics has a preliminary critical stage in which Hume evaluates the discussion of contemporaries with his predecessor and then evaluates the constructive stages he develops his position . But in natural religious discussions the situation is quite different. Dialogue on religion in natural dialogue and religious dialogue is a literature on Scottish philosopher David Hume's philosophy. This publication is consulting with three characters: Demea, Philo, Cleanthes, the essence of religion, and the existence of God. They all agree that God exists, but there are differences in nature and attributes, and they can gain understanding of God. One of the things they are talking about is the reason for the design for the existence of God. Hume started writing dialogue on religion in 1750, but it was not completed until 1776 before he died. Publications are based in part on Cicero's publication "De Natura Deorum" (in the nature of the gods). After death in 1779, a dialogue on religion came to Hume.

The foundation and structure of the design controversy about the existence of God concerns creators and designers who set things and plan everything today. Unlike cosmological arguments, "design theory" is simple and easy to understand, the steps are simple. The main argument the Design Argument claims is that everything in nature seems to be gathered together in the right way. Discussion of the design theory of existence of God is also called a teleological controversy, I believe that the universe is not just a coincidence opportunity, but to do it. This is God. This discussion is a vision because it is thought that the observation of the natural world has the conclusion of the designer. The belief that the universe is designed by God is caused by things like the four seasons, summer, spring, fall, and winter, this year is changing. Design controversy is an empirical argument against the existence of God. These arguments are made by inferring the existence of God as the best interpretation of these features, trying to identify the various empirical features of the world which usually (but not always) constitute the evidence of intelligent design. Because the concept of design and purpose is closely related, design argument is also called a theoretical argument and includes "terror", "target", or "purpose" in Greek. Discussion about the existence of God of William Perry and David Hume is called a theoretical argument or design theory. Discussion from design is an argument about the existence of God or some sort of creator based on thought of order or purpose in the universe. Hume took the way to oppose design arguments, and Paley defended it. Both Hume and Perry discuss very strongly, but in the end it will conclude to distinguish which philosopher has a stronger position. One of the traditional themes of natural theology is the existence of God, one of which is discussion from design and theoretical arguments. Discussion is that the existence of God can be proved by an obvious design in the complexity of the world. EncyclopædiaBritannica says, "This is most popular for the most accessible theoretical reason ... it deduces sacred designers and determines the evidence of design in nature.The coherent facts as a whole In this view, the same functional system also shows the wisdom of God behind it. "

Inductive is an important cognitive ability for which inference extends knowledge beyond the information available (Farrar, Raney, & Boyer, 1992). For example, if you know that an object belongs to a particular category, it may be considered that the object shares other attributes with other category members. This is essential for learning and interacting with the surrounding world and can be regarded as one of the most fundamental functions of biology. Induction occurs early in development (Sloutsky, Kloos, & Fisher, 2007). Inductive questions prove that recursive reasoning is observed from problems that are not observed. Scottish philosopher David Hume (1711-76) gave that classic expression and pointed out that all these reasoning relies either directly or indirectly on the premise of unfounded rationality similar to the past. There are roughly two kinds of problems, the first one requires natural consistency, the second one depends on the concept of causality, that is, "necessary connection". Inductive, inductive problems, also called Hume 's problem, are related to proving very basic irrational reasoning. Due to the conclusion that the next demographic member we encounter also has this nature, it seems reasonable to deduce from observation that a demographic sample has certain attributes. For example, when you eat a piece of bread, you conclude that bread nourishes you from many past conclusions, and this time it will do the same. However, bread is considered to be nourished in the past, but now it is not. The next piece of bread is like what you ate before and does not have to be an analytical or transcendental truth. How does your reasoning fill in the gap? Naturally, it appeals to the general principles people have found. However, as Hume pointed out, the future application of the previously proved reliability principle poses exactly the same problem.

I am familiar with childhood. I live with my brother Colby Winston, but I do not remember since I was 5 years old. We traveled all over Europe; Colby is a great gambler who likes to bet. He lied, he fooled, everything was changing. Colby promised me one thing, "Reagan," he said "One day in America, you are like me," I really want to believe him, but I see it happen I have never done it. But one day, fortunately, Colby won the biggest poker hand. There are few people who remember. There are some memorabilia - some books and movies - but in the minds of the public it is in contrast to the memory of the Titanic sunk two years ago. This is strange as more passengers die from the Queen (although the Titanic including the crew has more death). Why did they forget? It is widely believed that assassination of Daimyo Franz Ferdinand one month later brought about a war that began in August and brought Canadian maritime disasters to the public. With the massacre of the Western Front, many people just want to go forward and just forget the past. David Zeni, author of The Forgotten Queen, believes that other factors are working. For example, unlike John Jacob Astor of the Titanic, the queen has no prominent passengers. In a sense, it is interesting to read this niece Yvonne Hume which is a violinist John Hume (usually playing John Flum at the Titanic Monument). When he resigned from the Titanic, he was only 21 years old, left a sad family, a fiancee, and a child who was not born yet. This is a book full of information, but for any Titanic enthusiast, Titanic does not have "new" here. John is from Scotland 's Dumfries, but his illegal daughter later abandoned all relations with Scotland. Illustrations and photographs on Dumfries, and a lot of pictures of John and other family members. It is thought that Yvonne contains biographies of members of other bands. This announced death by 2000 that it was thought that "Fly" by the French Army and was not officially though everyone was aboard the ship during the First World War! In March 2011, Hume's niece, Yvonne Hume, released a biography detailing Jock's life and his fate at the Titanic. Directed by Titanic survivor Mil Vinadeen, this book is just a memorial of Hume and his fellows like a monument to his monument in Dumfries. He shared the monument with Thomas Mullin, the house manager who is also called Dumfries. Despite years of speculation about the last tune played by the Titanic, the fact remains that these people are finally trying to improve the spirit of the people on the ship.

The ability to achieve philosophical thinking through philosophical thinking is the ability to truly understand and understand everything that affects the environment and the surrounding environment and knowledge is the ultimate understanding and appreciation of the environment. Through this last understanding, philosophers can comprehend life and life more than ordinary people. Unfortunately, becoming a philosopher and even knowing philosophers may be difficult. For a long time philosophers have intensely discussed the classification of philosophical epistemology into two categories: rationalism and empiricism. We believe that empiricism can acquire knowledge only by observing facts or by experimenting, but rationalism gains knowledge through logical reasoning. Traditionally, there are two ways of epistemology. Rationalism, that is to obtain knowledge through reasoning, to obtain knowledge through empiricism, that is, sensory experience. There are several extremist philosophers, but most people think that both knowledge methods are necessary, to some extent they support and amend each other. I will explain in detail later. Rationalists pay attention to what they call the necessary truth. This means that something is true and must always be universal. Another term that means the same is a priori truth. Transcend is Latin 'preexisting' and you know that it must be a real transcendental truth before you begin to observe the world that senses reveal to us. Knowledge can only be obtained through experience, and experiences exist only as a unit of individual thought in thinking. This knowledge theory belongs to Scottish philosopher David Hume. Hume was born April 26, 1711 and is the second son of his family. His father died when he was a baby and asked his mother to take care of his brothers and sisters. David Hume gained great success through the general curriculum and discovered early love for literature. - Tested in various ways: The Catholic clergy of today's church by Christopher Ruddy also reflects the first article at Obleash Theological Seminary in San Antonio, Texas. The 7th Bernardine Cardinal Conference 2003 Ruddy reports on the sharing of academic and pastorian expertise and the voice of being a pastor. In addition to the report, this book opens and completes Ruddy's insight.

This article presents two different perspectives on the subject of design theory. In particular, I will explain the support to William Paley's design controversy and support for Bertrand Russell's design controversy. After introducing different perspectives, I appreciate the discussion to prove that William Paley is debating stronger. There are several forms of design discussion. The general form of design theory begins with the basic idea that part of the universe is such as to indicate that they are designed and have purpose. In the 1800s, British philosophy and moral philosopher William Paley wrote a paper entitled "Theory from Design." In the "design theory", Perry tried to prove the existence of superiority by developing a special theory called the teleological theory. The theoretical argument is an analogical argument based on the similarity between two different themes. In this article, we are intentionally defeating Perry's claim and trying to adopt the next method. Contact Us Discussion about the existence of God of William Perry and David Hume is called a theoretical argument or design theory. Discussion from design is an argument about the existence of God or some sort of creator based on thought of order or purpose in the universe. Hume took the way to oppose design arguments, and Paley defended it. Both Hume and Perry discuss very strongly, but in the end it will conclude to distinguish which philosopher has a stronger position. In Paley 's debate about the existence of God, "design argument", Paley tried to use his argument to prove that God is the sole designer and creator of the universe. He compares the universe with the watch and compares God with a clockmaker. In this discussion, Paley argues that the universe is quite complex and orderly so that only wise wisdom can design and create it. Paley believes that everything that shows design can be inferred that it is actually an intelligent design product. For example, if you look at your watch, you can confirm that it is designed in one of two ways. If a person checking the clock has experience using the watch earlier, it can be said that it is actually designed. If smart design marks are displayed on the watch, such as smooth surfaces and unique complex parts, you can guess the smart watch. essay.com/Paley vs. Hume This is an inductive argument about the origin and nature of God, religion, the universe. Paley vs. Hume This is an inductive argument about the origin and nature of God, religion, the universe.

We will explore various attitudes toward marriage in pride and prejudice. In the era of Jane Austen, marriage was mainly based on charm and compatibility. Women have the right to choose their husbands, but the status of society and wealth is an important part of their decision. In "pride and prejudice" we see many different attitudes and reasons for marrying in one sex. Jane Austen grew up in a family I love to read novels. This is a new writing concept different from poetry and drama. Compare and contrast various attitudes toward marriage represented by different personality of pride and prejudice. "Pride and prejudice" is one of the most famous novels in British literature history. Created by famous writer Jane Austin in 1813, his novel examines the nature of love. The overall tone of the novel is very light but serious. Proud and prejudice is a loving story about marriage. - Q: Compare and contrast the two proposals and their responses of Elizabeth. A. In "pride and prejudice", Elizabeth, the main female character, is very proud of the main male character Darcy. This is because at the first meeting, Elizabeth's pride was hurt because he said that he was harmed by Darcy. Results are brought. Cady Davis Bradshaw ENG 261 Dancing in the dialogue of "pride and prejudice" on October 9, 2014. In "Pride and Prejudice", Elizabeth Bennett and Darcy changed dramatically their attitudes towards each other. Darcy is dedicated to Elizabeth, but she denied this because of its low rank with the family. Elizabeth believes that Darcy is arrogant and interferes. Through the dialogue of these characters, they discovered real concern for each other. - David Hume is a Scottish philosopher living in the 18th century. Hume is now at the turning point of philosophy by infamous skepticism. He insisted that he was a moderate skeptic, but all philosophers later felt the result of his argument. His criticism has influenced various themes that Hume seems to eradicate. One of the themes that Hume attacks against his argument is the concept of individual identity.

Austin's Gully: Political unavoidability and impossibility of "non-serious" speech Abstract: This article attempts to show that criticism of Jack Derrida's Austin's performance speech has a political meaning. As Derrida asserts and as Austin denied, if the acting discourse is inevitably contaminated by words that Austin refuses to consider (an actor that a poet or a literary force never intended), it is a What is the impact? Country For a quarter of a century now, blue Texas seems to be both inevitable and impossible This is the central political contradiction of the country they define - conservatives are the best in the left wing capital Austin With jokingly it means that it is close to Texas; the largest American flag has often jumped by upsetters for complete division. For a long time, the Democratic Party believed that any breakthrough would be affected by demographics and triangular relations: attention to the city, increasing Hispanic population and international colorism. The end to the center is a bit cautious moderate. And I left a deep impression on the voters, how extreme is the incumbent? "The problem of identity and theory is a matter of considerable political significance and it is only possible to be promoted in the need of identity and" impossible "and in the stitching of psychology and discourse in those constitutions . Fully recognized (Hall 1996, quoted at St. Louis 2009) Finally, social identity is developing around their world. (Wetherell et al 2008) Working class, monetary value, educational level, popularity and other factors (Dyrenfurth 2009). How does politics become science if government laws and forms do not have a unified influence on society? ... It seems almost impossible to tackle scientific or some form of behavior from recognizing the principle of necessity and from motivation to spontaneous behavior, from personality to behavior . (Section 8 - Freedom and Necessity. Part 1) Hume said all knowledge is based on logical reasoning or experience. Absolutely some knowledge and demonstration can only come from logical reasoning. But logical reasoning can only produce mathematical abstract knowledge, it is not real. Experience is necessary to inform us of the truth. However, this knowledge is not an example, it is a posteriori. In addition, Hume claims that we can know the cause of a specific effect for the first time through experience.

Influence of Media Beauty Criteria on Women's Self-Esteem Under the daily fight against women's liberation and advertising pressures and influences, women of all ages are physically and psychologically required to obtain the best appearance or image I will be forced to suffer. This is not limited to a few people. Because girls wear the same clothes, cosmetics and accessories as their favorite star, you can see the work of high school television advertisers every day. They may also try to imitate the model they see in Youth Magazine. In a recent survey, advertisement has an adverse effect on women's self esteem, and mass media seems to have a greater influence on women than men. 1930's - Beginning of mass advertisements and fashion magazines - Since men have increased the importance of their "beauty" by 40%. Women increased the importance of a nice-looking husband by nearly 80%. In 1996, her husband 's women rated "cool" than men, and my wife looked "beautiful". However, more people are obese at any time in history. Wearing "sloppy" is standard Golden lie: how sex and deception promote human evolution, civilization and 2016 presidential election Influence of Media Beauty Criteria on Women's Self-Esteem Under the daily fight against women's liberation and advertising pressures and influences, women of all ages are physically and psychologically required to obtain the best appearance or image I will be forced to suffer. This is not limited to a few people. Because girls wear the same clothes, cosmetics and accessories as their favorite star, you can see the work of high school television advertisers every day. - David Hume's article "Taste Standards" solves the problem of how to determine objects. Hume solved three hypotheses on how to determine the aesthetic value. These assumptions are as follows. All preferences are equal, one art is better than the other art, the aesthetic value of art is defined by human preference (from the lecture). However, Hume discovered that these three beliefs are hypothetical 'contradictory triples' (from the lecture) Then, please teach frankly the self-esteem of "beautiful" people. Our pride is influenced by "beautiful" people. We create it in the environment where we live, whether self-esteem is either high or low. At work, school, and family, we are surrounded by beautiful pride. People not so beautiful have low self-esteem against the world and against themselves. The pigeon provides rich facts about self-esteem related to beauty. Dove's Pride Foundation, the company's article "The Real Girl, True Stress: A Nationwide Report on the Status of Self-Esteem" (2008) is analyzing the girl's pressure against their emotional stress. The pigeon gives many spirits to support each statement. Dove is talking about children and parents so that children and parents can participate positively. This article attracted young people, teenagers, and parents. Parents also contribute to the low self-esteem of children. Self-esteem is an important issue in the world

The importance of educational experience was always the subject of philosophical debate. These discussions between empiricists and rationalists have been on for a while. Rationalists believe that the knowledge gained through sensation can not be trusted, learning can only be accomplished through reasoning. On the other hand, experientists believe that knowledge can be obtained through empirical impressions and concepts that can not be learned without experience (Evans, 1992, p. 35). However, Kant solves this argument and believes that experience and reason are necessary conditions for learning. Empiricism and rationalism: Experiences are related to British enlightenment philosophers including John Rock, George Berkeley, Hume. Experiences believe that all human knowledge comes from sensory and sensory experiences. According to New Orleans of the University of Loyola, a rationalist who lives mainly on the European continent believes that the sensation is not reliable, and that knowledge is brought about through thought, or ideas and intuitional thought. John Comenius (1592 - 1670) is an excellent intellectual who supports universal education and practical education. He played an important role in introducing picture books written in their own languages, not Latin. He advocates development of lifelong learning and logical thinking, not memorization. He wants to educate women and poor children John Rock (1632-1704) was the first person in the classic English classics. These philosophers are skeptical of rationalistic metaphysics, in particular abuse of speculation, epistemology based on congenital concepts. Explain all natural knowledge of human knowledge without reference, and his theory is simpler and better than Descartes' theory. - To live in society based on the social contract we signed, the government and artificial law is definitely a strong defender of the treaty itself. They will benefit the citizens and protect the country's safety. Nonetheless, they should not be the only reasons for justice, it should not be a precondition for justice. In Kant 's epistemology the two conflicting camps were rationalists and empiricists. Rationalists led by Rene Descartes believe in a priori reasoning. Thinking of a series of assumptions, what can you infer? On the other hand, Hume and the empiricist. Camp learns from experience or prioritize reasoning after reasoning. So far, the neural network was empirical. Let's see a lot of data and draw conclusions from there. There are more theories behind other machine learning methods, but they still tend to be based on empiricism. Without data, they are nothing. Professor Pedro Domingos of the University of Washington changed the analogy of machine learning to a scientific method. Hypothesize and collect some data. Optimize assumptions and repeat

Kant and causation Introduction Criticizing the pure reason, Kant pointed out that "every change will occur according to the law of causality." 1 This statement is interpreted in two different ways: weak reading and strong reading. A weaker reading basically indicates that Kant's statement only means that "all events have a cause"; however, a strong reading is "a second analogism is caused not only by causality but also by causality It is also dedicated ". The difference is to pay attention to the difference between Kant's empirical natural law and universal transcendence. principle Kant called real things "all that can be achieved by freedom" and purely practical laws never given through perceptual conditions resemble the universal law of causality It is a moral law. The reason is that we can only give "rule of practical freedom through sensation", but the pure practice rules given by reasonable a priori determine "what to do". In the "critique of practical reasons" at the end of the second main part of the analysis, Kant introduced categories of freedom as well as categories that understood the real counterparts. Kant's liberal category is clearly predominantly a condition of the possibility of action (i) free, (ii) understood to be free, (iii) morally appreciated It is really important to distinguish between the general principle of Cant's causality and the specific causality determined in the second analogy. Equally important, Kant's specific causal relationship is a comprehensive post-incident rather than a comprehensive pre-case (at least in most cases). However, it does not mean that Kant agrees with Hume as to the status of synthetic post - causal law. Conversely, Kant said (as we have seen) Prolegomena, paragraph 29 (he made his official "Hume answer") has only a fundamental difference between "heuristics" Clearly stated. The illuminance of the sun and the true objective law (the sun is the light that passes through it and the cause of the heat) is derived by adding an a priori concept that is due to a simple induction law. In this case (A 91 / B 124):

The problem of evil in philosophy I am considered to have the god of the world who is always responsible for everything that happens in our daily life. This belief is most meaningful to me and makes me feel complete. But I also know that some people in this world do not believe in the existence of God and have logical arguments like evil to support them. Philosophers such as Hume and Maggie believe that if God is gentle, omnipotent, and omniscient, he will not let evil exist. The problem of evil in philosophy What is the classic "evil problem" ("three difficulties") in the Western philosophy / theological tradition? The problem of evil is how to harmonize the existence of evil with omnipotence, omniscience, and the presence of the Almighty God. Greek philosopher Epicuras detailed this trilemma in ancient times and summarized it in modern David Hume. Epicuras advocates a trilemma to counter the concept of almighty Then there is discipline sometimes called "religious philosophy". This is a philosophy of man and discusses some problems that influence religion in philosophy like evil problems ("Why is the world evil if God is holy and omnipotent?" ? "). These questions can be answered only by leaving all our thoughts to God's sovereignty. For example, why does God seek permission for existence? Answer: Punish or forgive it for its own glory. This wonderful fact has a very deep meaning. Of course, since human philosophy is not satisfied with the answer, it invented various irrational alternatives. Perhaps one of the oldest and most challenging theological problems in Christian philosophy is to ask why the world has so much evil though God was omnipotent and perfectly kind. It is often referred to as "problem of evil" in philosophical world, or "Cong question" as C. S. Lewis said. Numerous theological and philosophical arguments, books and seminars are studying this problem. There are many reasons for people to check "painful problems" - some are sincere doubts, some are outside their painful heartache. By finding answers to this question, while many people discover new aspects of God's personality and deepen their faith in God, others simply face this problem to abandon their faith did.

Answer: The history of inflation in India: India is initially high and low inflation. Except for 1956, the inflation rate of the Republic of India was originally less than 10%. Watch the complete answer with ... Historically, large amounts of economic literature have focused on the causes of inflation and its impact. There are various ways of thinking about the cause of inflation. The majority of them are divided into two major fields. Inflation quality theory and quantitative theory of inflation. The quality inflation theory depends on the seller's expectation of accepting currency, so you can exchange it later as a product of the buyer. Quantitative inflation theory depends on the equation of money quantity related to money supply, the speed of currency distribution and the nominal value of exchange. Adam Smith and David Hume proposed quantitative theory of money inflation and quality theory of production inflation. According to studies that have been done so far, the cause of inflation varies, which leads to the complex thinking of economic experts who believe that inflation is caused by quality or quantity theory (macroeconomics, item 1) . Quality theory is that the goods seller hides the goods only when the demand is high and the quantity depends on the country's money supply in circulation or distribution. One of the main reasons for inflation is government activity; this is when the government uses extra money to respond to specific crises. An increase in domestic excess supply of money lowers the value of money, and commodity prices rise from this decline, leading to inflation (Mishkin, p. 68).

Free will means that people can make their own decisions without restriction of necessity or destiny. Determinism thinks the initial conditions of the universe are the same as all possible worlds, including natural laws that cause all events to perform the same function. Events are determined by initial conditions. The two main positions regarding the relationship between free will and determinism are compatibility and incompatibility. But there is another possibility. Free will is wrong, determinism is the truth. This is the "hard" determinism of James' tradition. Van Inwagen believes many philosophers that the compatibility - incompatibility dichotomy is more significant than the traditional liberal deterministic dichotomy (compatibility is their settlement). He wrote in 1983 that: "I am convinced that this term is useless," "convincing," "liberalism." The terms used are easy to define, so in this regard it is not worse than the term. Some philosopher's views are difficult to classify as compatibility or incompatibility, hard determinist, or liberal. For example, Mr. Ted Honderich thinks "determinism is true, compatibility and incompatibility are wrong," the real problem is elsewhere. Honderich insists that certainty is correct. Because quantum phenomena are abstract entities, not things that can exist in events, space and time. Furthermore, even if they were at micro level, they seem to have nothing to do with the way the world is at the macro level. Even if uncertainty is true, he insists that incompatibility is wrong, because non-conformers do not provide it and can not provide sufficient explanation of the origin. Because compatibility is based on the basic concept of freedom, he refuses compatibility. Freedom, there are two concepts. It is spontaneous behavior and origin. The "new" problem is how to solve this conflict. Compatibility and incompatibility In philosophy, the term compatibility often refers to the position in the problem of freedom and determinism. Intuitively, freedom seems to exclude determinism, and vice versa. However, some philosophers have denied this, arguing that actions can be free and deterministic, traditional problems are confusion thought caused by excessive attention to the meaning of words It is often added that it is the result of. Hume takes this position. In the eighth part of his "Investigation on Human Understanding," he explained his project as "necessary" and "free" which are terms of his freedom and determinism. Hume said that freedom includes acting according to your will, acting according to your decision. Freedom is not an unrestricted act, it is an act caused by the need, desire, decision of the person performing it.

It goes without saying that Elvis Presley is one of the most important cultural forces in history, the first genuine American star of rock music. Abolition of the symbol The nature of Presley is so fresh and eye-catching that he can never label. He forever changed music as a legend of king and music. Elvis became the first rock star to break the boundaries of American culture. Most people know that Elvis Presley is a famous singer, but many people do not fully understand his contribution to popular music to win his broad reputation. Elvis Presley was born on Gladys Love Presley (née Smith) in Tupelo, Michigan on January 8, 1935, and his father, Vernon Elvis Presley, has created a shotgun room for two rooms. Jesse Gallon Presley, his identical twin brother, was sent 35 minutes before his death. Presley has a close relationship with his parents and has a particularly close relationship with his mother. The family attended the church of God's assembly where he found his first musical inspiration. On his mother's side, Presley's ancestors were Scottish Irish and French Norman. Gladys and other families clearly believe that her great-grandmother morning pigeon is Cherokee; the biography of Elaine Dundy supports this idea, but at least one pedigree researcher in many ways I asked a question. Vernon's ancestry was German or Scottish. Gladys is regarded as a family member from relatives and friends. Elvis Aaron Presley was born on January 8, 1935 in East Tupelo, Michigan, born in Née Gladys Love Smith and Vernon Elvis Presley. He has stubborn twin brothers. In 1948, Elvis and her parents moved to Memphis, Tennessee, where he went to Hume High School. In 1953, he took part in a high-level dance with the present girls Regis Wilson. After graduating from Memphis High School, Elvis served Royal Electric film guide and truck driver. He began singing "The Hillbilly Cat" locally, then contracted with a local record company and signed with RCA in 1955. The story of Elvis Presley's wonderful life started on January 8, 1935. Elvis · Aaron · Presley was born in Vernon and Gladys · Presley in Miss Tupper. Luo's 2 bedroom house. His twin brother, Jess Galleon, who died grew up from Elvis as a child. He and his parents moved to Memphis, Tennessee in 1948, and in 1953 Elvis graduated there from Hume 's High School. In 1954, Elvis started his career in Memphis's legendary San Record brand. At the end of 1955, his recording contract was sold to RCA Victor. By 1956, he was an international sensation. That sound and style uniquely combines his diverse musical influences, blurred and challenged the social and ethnic barriers of that era, and created a new era of American music and pop culture.

"I do not mind shouting" is exploring the juvenile court system in California in the 1990s. Through the story of a colorful story, the author Edward Hume depicts a vivid picture of the real dysfunction of the system. The main concern is the various ways the system can make many teenagers fail. Peggy Beckstrand, a vice district prosecutor, said, "What I first learned about this place is that it has no effect." (Anyway, one of the wishes of the Juvenile Court on January 31, 1996 is the judge Roosevelt Dawn. Edward Humes noted in his 1997 survey of my scream at the Los Angeles Juvenile Court in 1997 that the juvenile court system needs to be reformed thoroughly. While he does not provide counseling, support, accountability, but declares a child upset early in the criminal course, this system provides adult courts with opportunities for good rehabilitation to too many children He said. 57% of children were arrested for the first time, 27% were arrested once or twice, and 16% committed crimes more than four times The Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Hughes spent his life studying the juvenile justice system in California. Hume wrote a dynamic report on California's juvenile justice system and the children who passed it. This carefully studied book records the arrest of seven adolescents and their experience in the juvenile court and declares their sentences. The book also explains legal proceedings and interactions among prosecutors, public, private advocates and judges. These will determine the fate of these young people. This book first clarifies the legal development of juvenile offenders. The first step is easy. You may not be talking loudly. I shout at everyone more frequently. You may think too much before talking. What you said is not important, please be concerned with the volume you are talking about. We recommend that you repeat the sound as often as possible until it makes little sense. The Internet wants someone to shout / girl. That is what the Internet wants. You can create theme tags and post tweets (loudly) Warning: Please speak loudly, but can you speak loudly in a cute, sexy way? This makes working easier. Please try to sugar your voice. Boys absolutely like sugar! Still, they may spit it out. In fact, it does not matter what your information is. Warning: When you stand up for yourself, they do not like it much. Recently, I attended a conference where topics of feminists emerged. In the conversation, I was disturbed by several men. When I pointed out what they were doing as an example of a problem with a joke, I said, "As you can not stop talking, maybe you have been interrupted a lot." (It's ridiculous to not tell a woman to say "Do not bother a man" is ridiculous. "Enter telepathy into the brain of men and change behavior!

In the second example, Kant believes that we must guess that each event must be assumed to be determined by a prior event based on causality. There are many explanations in this discussion, but I can not prove that it is valid. In this article, I explained this discussion myself. I gained insight by Robert Paul Wolff. In Kant's argument, since Kant is usually explained, it is necessary to assume that the causal decision of each event is not that it is necessary to impose the "necessary" and "irreversible" chronological order on the representation of the state of the object there is. Create comprehensive representative It is really important to distinguish between the general principle of Cant's causality and the specific causality determined in the second analogy. Equally important, Kant's specific causal relationship is a comprehensive post-incident rather than a comprehensive pre-case (at least in most cases). However, it does not mean that Kant agrees with Hume as to the status of synthetic post - causal law. Conversely, Kant clearly states that in Prolegomena, Paragraph 29 (as we have seen), in paragraph 29 (he made his official "Hume the answer") there is only a fundamental difference between "heuristics" I am talking about. The illuminance of the sun and the true objective law (the sun is the light that passes through it and the cause of the heat) is derived by adding an a priori concept that is due to a simple induction law. In this case (A 91 / B 124): In the second example, Kant believes that we must guess that each event must be assumed to be determined by a prior event based on causality. There are many explanations in this discussion, but I can not prove that it is valid. In this article, I explained this discussion myself. I gained insight by Robert Paul Wolff. In Kant's argument, since Kant is usually explained, it is necessary to assume that the causal decision of each event is not that it is necessary to impose the "necessary" and "irreversible" chronological order on the representation of the state of the object there is. Create comprehensive representative

Aquinas prove the fifth way of existence of God. A simple summary of Akinas' fifth way to prove the existence of God. Mr. Hume quotes an objection to answer this argument in design. What is the answer to John Hick's argument from the evil of Hume? Is he correct? Thomas Aquinas proposed five different logical arguments to prove that God uses scientific assumptions and basic assumptions of nature to exist. In the fifth of his famous "five ways" Aquinas proposed the hypothesis that all natural bodies will go to the end. The fifth method of Aquinus to prove the existence of God by showing how God leads all the natural things. The fifth method explains how we observe natural body behavior. All actions directed towards the purpose are under the guidance of knowledge-based or something with knowledge. But many natural people lack knowledge. "Therefore there are some wise beings and all the natural things are directed towards their end, this is what we call God." Using the analogy of Oak and Perry's watchmaker By, I will prove that the existence of God is genuine. Whether the fifth method of Aquinas prove the existence of God is decisive. It is clear that everything in the universe must have a designer, whether it is an oak or a clock manufacturer's analogy. To Aquinas it is logically assumed that inanimate objects like planets may never be organized and there is clearly a lack of wisdom to do so. They are commanded by wise men, it is God Thomas Aquinas presented five different logical arguments to prove that God used scientific assumptions and basic assumptions of nature to exist. In the fifth of his famous "five ways" Aquinas proposed the hypothesis that all natural bodies will go to the end. Since the object is constantly moving in the best way to accomplish this, the path must be designed. Of course, God is the ultimate designer of the universe. The next natural assumption is that the universe and all life are constantly moving in the best way towards this goal, as God created the universe, including humans, for purpose or purpose. The theory of scopos is called "discussion from design" or "discussion from fine adjustment". This argument is usually beneficial to the individual gods that the writer uses to prove this. It began in the fifth street of St. Thomas Aquinas and was developed throughout history. One of the most famous developments of this idea is William Paley's analogy called "analogy of clock artisans", after which F.R's thoughts continue. The tenant named it "human principle". Aquinas is a theologian of the main work published in the latter half of the 13th century, the most famous of which is "Summa Theologica". Of the approximately 3,500 pages of books, the most famous one so far is Aquinas's "five ways" with only 2 pages. Scopos theory is the fifth road of Aquinas and its layout is as follows.

The history of the 20th century will not be perfect unless I mention the perfect impact of one of the best and greatest singers ever. But before he began making signs that would not disappear in the course of time, he began with a very humble beginning, under the care of his loving working-class parents. Elvis Aaron Presley was born on 8th January 1935 at Gladys and Vernon Presley of Missladi, Tupelo. Although Presley should be a pair of twins, he believes that twin brother Jessie Gallon sometimes spells Jesse as stillbirth. The story of Elvis Presley's wonderful life started on January 8, 1935. Elvis · Aaron · Presley was born in Vernon and Gladys · Presley in Miss Tupper. Luo's 2 bedroom house. His twin brother, Jess Galleon, who died grew up from Elvis as a child. He and his parents moved to Memphis, Tennessee in 1948, and in 1953 Elvis graduated there from Hume 's High School. In 1954, Elvis started his career in Memphis's legendary San Record brand. At the end of 1955, his recording contract was sold to RCA Victor. By 1956, he was an international sensation. That sound and style uniquely combines his diverse musical influences, blurred and challenged the social and ethnic barriers of that era, and created a new era of American music and pop culture. Elvis Aaron Presley, an actor and musician born in Tupelo, Mississippi on January 8, 1935. From a very unobtrusive beginning, Elvis Presley grew into one of the biggest names in the history of music. Some people dislike the influence of Elvis Presley, but Elvis influences the world of music. I do not spend most of Preste's family prepaid by the working-class, compassionate parents. The Elvis Presleys family often moved from one place to another. Elvis respected his mother Gladys, his parents, especially Presley, who gave me strong faith and trust to God. Presley and his parents attended the church, the church of God. Gospel music has great influence on him, it helps his career Elvis Aaron Presley was born on January 8, 1935 in East Tupelo, Michigan, born in Née Gladys Love Smith and Vernon Elvis Presley. He has stubborn twin brothers. In 1948, Elvis and her parents moved to Memphis, Tennessee, where he went to Hume High School. In 1953, he took part in a high-level dance with the present girls Regis Wilson. After graduating from Memphis High School, Elvis served Royal Electric film guide and truck driver. He began singing "The Hillbilly Cat" locally, then contracted with a local record company and signed with RCA in 1955.

The way to compare and contrast words and Hume wrote a natural style and poetry in those poems and Hughes wrote a poem "蓟" on how these plants are. He said that they seemed to be symbols of violent and violent creatures. He believes that they are a symbol of revenge, pain, and threat. It is very sharp and can harm anyone. They create a lot of confusion written in dull, immortal, green, rough, and ???????. On the other hand, Wordsworth wrote a small golden flower about "Daffodil". The relationship between Humans and Nature in Hughes and Wordsworth poems focuses on one verse of each poem which contrasts and contrasts the approach to Hughes and Wordsworth human beings and nature. Beliefs about the relationship between man and nature, I think they are seeing different ways of relationship between the two. Hughes takes a more pessimistic and negative attitude and believes that nature should protect itself from the devastating effects of human beings. The way to compare and contrast words and Hume wrote a natural style and poetry in those poems and Hughes wrote a poem "蓟" on how these plants are. He said that they seemed to be symbols of violent and violent creatures. He believes that they are a symbol of revenge, pain, and threat. It is very sharp and can harm anyone. They create a lot of confusion written in dull, immortal, green, rough, and ???????. On the other hand, Wordsworth wrote a small golden flower about "Daffodil". William Wordsworth and William Blake, who compared William Wordsworth 's Westminster Bridge and William Blake' s London, wrote about London poetry, but they presented their views from different angles. Wordsworth saw the beauty of London, and Black saw only the ugliness. William Wordsworth's "Composed upon Westminster Bridge" shows step by step London's wonderful beauty at sunrise, but "London" at William Blake passes through London. The street shows a dull and ugly life in London. Through a comparison course between William Wordsworth and William Black's London Westminster Bridge, I called William Wordsworth Wordsworth and William Black Black. Both Wordsworth and Black's poems are about London, but Wordsworth's poem was written when he came to London while Black lived in London. Wordsworth's poem is about gorgeous costumes in London, he can see this, he wrote in the first line; "There is nothing on Earth that can act more fairly:" Praise, he likes London, but we are told that he is looking at London with that bad perspective.

For years, people have always believed that golf swing is a certain sport with no difference in variables. Over the past two decades, the widespread expansion of technology has generated more information on the biomechanics of golf swing. "Golf biomechanics applies the principles and techniques of golf technology to the structure and function of golfers to improve golf skill and performance" (Hume P., Keogh J., and Reid D. applying the mechanical principle To understand the discipline of exercise. "(Hume P., Keogh J. and Reid D. The report will conduct a biomechanical analysis of the golf swing of three students. Based on this analysis, rank students based on swing distance and accuracy. The next step will be biomechanical and anatomical reasons explaining the reasons for these rankings. Then I will reach the conclusion that emphasizes the key elements and appropriate skills necessary for accurate and remote golf driving. Golfer 1 Andrea Graham could not include all eight stages of the golf cart (see Appendix D), thereby minimizing the acceleration of her downswing. This is because she does not provide the club with the best range of motion to get the best possible speed before impact. Graham's total power and time (Teacher's Note: 2003) also influenced her motives. In the backswing phase (see Appendix D), her knees remain fixed and the pelvis is stiff, so weight is not transmitted and countless related errors can occur. After analyzing the three golf swings of three very different students, I concluded that there are many different biomechanical aspects that can affect the distance and accuracy of the shots. In the first phase of the golf swing, time of force and overall muscle and body movements are important for creating optimum force and strength. Maintaining long levers throughout the swing has a major impact on the distance achieved. The acceleration of downswing and the speed at which the club hits the ball also affects the distance. The most important elements for accuracy are the flattening of the arc, the position of the golf ball relative to the standing, the release of the 45 degree angle, and the force applied to the golf ball, thus establishing its course.

For Kant and Luther, the problems of human freedom and the number of individual freedoms (if any) are determined to achieve a noble morality. But it is Kant that Luther is arguing, that is, through freedom of religion, I believe in a fatal outlook. For Luther, without God's guidance, we have no freedom to live a moral life. On the other hand, for Kant, Luther insists that individuals are in an "immature" state, so that moral freedom can not be achieved. Kant understanding moral freedom and moral principles has been a key to discussing morality from long ago. His moral philosophy is the philosophy of freedom. No one's freedom, Kant's idea, moral evaluation and moral responsibility are also impossible. Kant believes that if a person can not take other actions, that action is not moral. He further believes that there is a conscience to make everyone understand that moral law has authority over them. Kant called it a "rational fact" and thought that he was the foundation of human freedom. However, Kant believes that the whole nature will follow the principle of strict Newton's causality. In other words, all our physical behavior is caused not by our free will, but by previous events. So how is freedom and morality possible? Hume and Kant believe that freedom is indispensable to morality. In addition, both believe that philosophical theory and advocacy of human morals will harmonize a universal causality need (determinism) and freedom. But they offer different ways to understand different concepts of freedom, different ways to harmonize them with necessary, and why such reconciliation is important to morality. The scholars agree that Hume is a "compatriot", but there is no agreement on the right label of Kant's position. Kant's moral theory is the core concept of autonomy. Most readers believe that Kant believes autonomy is a reasonable intention or property of an agent. In Kant's view, understanding the concept of autonomy is the key to understanding and prove that moral requirements are important to our authority. Just as Rousseau's view influences Kant, freedom is not limited by any law and is limited by some law. Therefore, the concept of freedom as autonomy exceeds the sense that it is simply "negative", that is, the sense that it is released from actions outside of you. It initially contains the concept of law developed and enacted by itself, and along with it the law with its own decisive authority

Many people think Aristotle is one of the most influential philosophers in history. As a student of Plato, he established his metaphysical doctrine of formal theory of his tutor and his perception of the soul. But he also challenged them and introduced his own metaphysical ideas such as behavior and effectiveness, inflectious ideology, and four reasons. He uses these ideas to account for his unimportant explanation of the soul and intelligence. Prior to Aristotle, philosophers such as Parmenides and Heraclitus discussed the existence of change. Aristotle and Plato's excellence is a function, and what makes it a function is the definition of Plato's virtue. What does this definition mean? Both Plato and Aristotle have their own unique arguments dedicated to the topic in front of you and a way to explain what virtue is. It seems easy to define virtues, but it may be very difficult to truly understand the arguments behind the definition. - Definition of Philosophy Personal or moral philosophy is about how people should live or how to act. People who claim that the philosophy of our life is "lifetime", "at horn", or some cliches are often heard. Though the definitions are correct, these people use the phrase "philosophy", but the words closely related to our past, present and future great thinkers are different. Author: Gerard · Cretian Plato and Aristotle Many modern experts believe Plato was the first true political philosophy, Aristotle is the first political scholar. They are the foundation of Socrates's great thinker and great Western philosopher. Plato and Aristotle each have ideas on how to improve their society during their existence. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze their different theories with this heavy metaphysical speculation. In conclusion, Hume wishes to limit metaphysical speculation to one field and is not so inclined to such a fate.

He believes that David Hume is a British empiricist and all knowledge comes from sensory experience in the end and that all of our thoughts are from previous emotions and reflections. The explanation of the relationship had a big impact. In this article we will look at Hummus's explanation of the causal relationship and see if any versions of the causality view can be defended. Before looking at the regularity of causality, it is important to look at the reproductive principle of Hume as the view on his causality is relevant. 154 mils (1911: Chapter 10, Section 10, Section 1). Unlike 155 Muller, it is noteworthy that McGee does not support Hume's traditional causal relations view. In particular he believes that it does not capture the important aspect of our causality concept, the counterfactual relationship between its effect and its cause. Mackie believes that "causing B" usually means "if A does not occur, B will not occur," and we believe that regularity of causality can not be dealt with fairly. This is the concept. Please see. Mackie (1974: chapters 2 and 60, page 77). 156 The difference lies in the question "what the description of the causal relationship means" and "what constitutes the causal relationship within the object". See Mackie (1974: 77). 157 Mackie (1974: 64; 1965: 37) 158 Mackie (1974: 62 and Chapter 10). Some people think that only events, wealth, or facts may be the cause There are two major types of causality theory: Hume's theory (as "ordinary wording") and causal realism (as a causal mechanism). According to Hume's theory, causality is completely constituted from empirical facts between observable variables; there is no need for a potential causal relationship, causality or causality. Causal relations scholars view the concept of causality and the power of causality as fundamental, and claim that the work of scientific research is to obtain empirically correct theories and assumptions about their causal mechanisms. Let's consider various arguments about this sentence. X causes Y. An important element of Tizam's view is that there is a difference between the causal relationship of events and the causal relationship of agents. In the former, the causal relationship leading to the event is another event. In the latter, there is one person who has a causal relationship with the event. With this characteristic, Tisam's view is often classified as a form of liberalism. Another basic element he believes is that when a person moves freely he will do something without a combination of events, conditions, or events and conditions. (Clearly, there are no events or conditions that are sufficient causal conditions for him to fail to do this.) In this aspect of his point of view, it may be regarded as incorporating uncertainty.

The 17th century was the beginning of the era of scientific progress known as the scientific revolution in Europe. It is this stage that use of reason and new progress of science brought about a paradigm shift. Paradigm shift is a change in the basic assumption (example) arising from discovering new information that is no longer compatible with existing paradigms and forcing them to change the framework of thought to accommodate new hypotheses . With the development of ideas such as Francis Bacon (1561-1627), the scientific community has undergone a major change. British philosopher and politician Bacon abandoned classical deductive methods of natural understanding from Aristotle but instead adopted experimental induction method. He rejects traditional authority and provides "experiments and induction methods that seem to provide absolutely reliable means to distinguish truth from mistakes". {4} Science was anxious to find it that later became a source of Western trust. For example, the invention of the telescope has resulted in the destruction of Aristotle's cosmology. There, the earth and man himself were central. Aristotle teaches that the universe is a series of concentric spheres, one outside the other. Historian James Turner said: "Copernicus and his successor broke the world. Between 1500 and 1700, the way people in Europe understand and understand the world has changed dramatically and dramatically. Through the work of thinkers such as Francis Bacon, Galileo Galilei, Johannes Kepler, Rene Descartes, Isaac Newton etc., the Western world experienced the scientific revolution. It shifted from a world view dominated by church and Christian theology and ethics to a mechanically-like material world of inanimate controlled by the power of nature and precise mathematical rules (Capra and Luisi, 2014a). Hume is an avid believer in the scientific method advocated by Francis Bacon, Galileo Galilei (1564-1642) and Sir Isaac Newton (1643-1727). However, applying the induction problem to science shows that all science is actually based on logical error. The so-called induction error points out that even if something has happened in the past, even if it occurs frequently, it can not be assumed to happen again. But this is the basis of the scientific method and Hume is forced to draw conclusions and it seems insufficient that the scientific method appears to be effective even if delay is applied.

Elvis Presley Elvis Presley is a legend of life-style music. Even though he dies, he is still the king of rock and roll. He was born in Mississippi, Mississippi on January 8, 1935. His family moved to Memphis, Tennessee where he graduated from Hume High School. He was fascinated by music since he was young, and in 1954 he began music career at Memphis' s Sun Record. At the end of 1955, his recording contract was bought by RCA Victor. By 1956, he was an international sensation. He starred in 33 movies and produced hundreds of TV series and special programs. Elvis Presley was born on Gladys Love Presley (née Smith) in Tupelo, Michigan on January 8, 1935, and his father, Vernon Elvis Presley, has created a shotgun room for two rooms. Jesse Gallon Presley, his identical twin brother, was sent 35 minutes before his death. Presley has a close relationship with his parents and has a particularly close relationship with his mother. The family attended the church of God's assembly where he found his first musical inspiration. On his mother's side, Presley's ancestors were Scottish Irish and French Norman. Gladys and other families clearly believe that her great-grandmother morning pigeon is Cherokee; the biography of Elaine Dundy supports this idea, but at least one pedigree researcher in many ways I asked a question. Vernon's ancestry was German or Scottish. Gladys is regarded as a family member from relatives and friends. Elvis Aaron Presley was born on January 8, 1935 in East Tupelo, Michigan, born in Née Gladys Love Smith and Vernon Elvis Presley. He has stubborn twin brothers. In 1948, Elvis and her parents moved to Memphis, Tennessee, where he went to Hume High School. In 1953, he took part in a high-level dance with the present girls Regis Wilson. After graduating from Memphis High School, Elvis served Royal Electric film guide and truck driver. He began singing "The Hillbilly Cat" locally, then contracted with a local record company and signed with RCA in 1955.

Aristotle and Plato's excellence is a function, and what makes it a function is the definition of Plato's virtue. What does this definition mean? Both Plato and Aristotle have their own unique arguments dedicated to the topic in front of you and a way to explain what virtue is. It seems easy to define virtues, but it may be very difficult to truly understand the arguments behind the definition. Before discussing virtue, you must first consider the only problem. Author: Gerard · Cretian Plato and Aristotle Many modern experts believe Plato was the first true political philosophy, Aristotle is the first political scholar. They are the foundation of Socrates's great thinker and great Western philosopher. Plato and Aristotle each have ideas on how to improve their society during their existence. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze their different theories with this heavy metaphysical speculation. In conclusion, Hume wishes to limit metaphysical speculation to one field and is not so inclined to such a fate. Aristotle and Plato's excellence is a function, and what makes it a function is the definition of Plato's virtue. What does this definition mean? Both Plato and Aristotle have their own unique arguments dedicated to the topic in front of you and a way to explain what virtue is. It seems easy to define virtues, but it may be very difficult to truly understand the arguments behind the definition. - Definition of Philosophy Personal or moral philosophy is about how people should live or how to act. People who claim that the philosophy of our life is "lifetime", "at horn", or some cliches are often heard. Though the definitions are correct, these people use the phrase "philosophy", but the words closely related to our past, present and future great thinkers are different.

Exploring Historical Causal Relations There are many theories about the cause of historical events. There is no doubt that there are various reasons in fact. In my opinion, danger is to support excluding certain types of causes from all other reasons. There is only one reason. However, it will be interesting to see if you can find some common clues or some of the theoretical foundations. The two special barriers we understand are worth exploring in more detail. One is a causal relationship problem. "The older children are reading age is high," said the headline. This can summarize the results of careful study of nutrition and cognition. Or perhaps it reflects a clear view that an 8 - year - old child reads better than a 4 - year - old child. Causality is a troublesome task both philosophically and technically, but for people who accidentally consume statistics the problem is not that complicated. Ask if there is a claim of causality and ask if it is reasonable. In this article, before describing the causal relationship and explaining how he uses these important insights to create inductive problems, it is necessary to provide an empirical basis for explaining his causal relation in detail I will explore. After explaining the two main elements of Hume's causal relation concept, three interpretive groups will be explored: causal reductionists regard the definition of Hume's causality as a certainty, and for the skeptics Hume Induction Induction Problem For unresolved and causal realists, he introduced additional descriptive tools to avoid these conclusions, Hume has some strong causal relation concepts He insisted. There are two major types of causality theory: Hume's theory (as "ordinary wording") and causal realism (as a causal mechanism). According to Hume's theory, causality is completely constituted from empirical facts between observable variables; there is no need for a potential causal relationship, causality or causality. Causal relations scholars view the concept of causality and the power of causality as fundamental, and claim that the work of scientific research is to obtain empirically correct theories and assumptions about their causal mechanisms. Let's consider various arguments about this sentence. X causes Y. Agent - causal relationship agent - causality is a causal relationship of (hypothesis) type and can best be understood by comparing it with the causal relationship of the event. When the ball hits the window and breaks down, the causal relationship here may think that the event causing another event, that is, the window hit the window and the window is broken. In the case of an agent causal relationship, it is not an event that causes another event. Instead, an agent (persistent entity) can raise an event. A philosopher like Rodrik Chisholm (see Chisholm's "Human freedom and self") claims that causal relations of agents are necessary for true free will. Agent causal relationships (see Tizam) are sometimes called internal causal relationships, event causal relationships are sometimes called cross causal relationships

Determinism and Freedom From the outset, the concept of free will is closely related to the issue of moral responsibility. Free will is defined as the ability to be released from physical, social, and psychological factors. For example, suppose that a person is neither a madman nor a child, and consciously and freely chooses a crime without being influenced by the causal relationship of past events. In contrast to the concept of free will, there is an idea that may not trigger the conditions of other events for the concept of determinism, or for all the events that occur. Freedom and determinism - This question is whether human beings can control their actions and understand the motivation behind them or whether they are determined by the causal relationship of the power whose actions can not be controlled. Behavior is classified according to various theories as unconscious, environmental or biological. Genetics and environment - Personality is thought to depend mainly on genetics and biology, or environment and experience. Modern research shows that most personality traits are based on combined effects of genetics and the environment. One of the pioneers of this stage is C. Robert Cloninger who developed a temperament and personality model. Compatibility and incompatibility In philosophy, the term compatibility often refers to the position in the problem of freedom and determinism. Intuitively, freedom seems to exclude determinism, and vice versa. However, some philosophers have denied this, arguing that actions can be free and deterministic, traditional problems are confusion thought caused by excessive attention to the meaning of words It is often added that it is the result of. Hume takes this position. In the eighth part of his "Investigation on Human Understanding," he explained his project as "necessary" and "free" which are terms of his freedom and determinism. Hume said that freedom includes acting according to your will, acting according to your decision. Freedom is not an unrestricted act, it is an act caused by the need, desire, decision of the person performing it. In understanding multiple positions of freedom and deterministic paradox, we can understand that determinism is the basic foundation of the determinist. The determinist believes the determinism is correct. If all the actions are triggered, then there is no free action. If there is no free action, no one will be responsible for that action. Therefore, no one is responsible for the action. Starting from the determinist's conclusion, they accepted the final premise of incompatibility. Incompatibility, for any action A, we believe that A is determined by causal relationship beyond agent control if A is determined by the ancestor. If the agent does not have control, the action performed by the agent is not free. Incompatible people end in a pairing statement: If the certainty is true, each action is determined by the ancestor, and if the certainty is true, the action is not free.

Epistemology is his study of our right to believe in myself. In a broader sense, we start with what we call cognition and ask if we have reason to take these positions. When discussing the cognitive standpoint, we must include both our beliefs and what we know. At a deeper level, we will examine our attitude towards strategies and methods used to acquire new beliefs and filter old beliefs. However, the epistemology relates to whether we acted responsibly in the formation of faith or acted irresponsibly. Alvin Goldman also outlines similar prior knowledge. His explanation is based on two assumptions. At first he is his explanation about the credibility of his understanding. This is followed by a general view that previous knowledge is based on knowledge of "pure thought" processes that function independently of experience and perception. If you can see that humans have reliable natural reasoning and computer systems, and if there is some evidence that we are doing this, these mechanisms are believed to give belief a priori and reasonable It is thoughtful. In particular, the beliefs gained from the behavior of these mechanisms without relying on perception are strong candidates of prior knowledge. Prior knowledge is a way to gain knowledge without the need for experience. In Bruce Russell's article 'A priori knowledge and knowledge' he states that this is "knowledge based on a priori reason 1". Transcendental knowledge contrasts with the posteriori knowledge acquired through experience. All crows are black. If you believe in option A, you believe that it is a priori reason, because you do not need to know that a crow is it a bird. If you believe in choice B, you have a reason to believe it, because you know that they are black, as you have seen many crows. He continued to say that it is not a question whether that statement is true if you believe that one is important. Immanuel Kant made a significant contribution to understanding previous knowledge. He showed that a priori knowledge can be comprehensive, that is, new knowledge can be obtained, which is not implicit in a priori propositions. Before Kant's work, it is generally accepted that all previous knowledge is analytical, ie any knowledge recognized from a priori propositions is included in the proposition and extracted through the analysis It was. David Hume was an early contemporary in the Kantian period and he showed that the reason can not logically deduce its effect (in Kant 's, believed, believed, in a rationalist school). Hume proposed then that there is no prior knowledge of causality. Kant disputed this proposal and argued that it is possible to synthesize a priori knowledge. Russell explains Kant's argument by presenting Kant's stock price example 7 + 5 = 12

Elvis changed the life of rock music forever and is also the rock and roll champion, but he was regarded as "white garbage" to play the country's music. Talent is varied, such as singing gospel music and paying for guitar while singing. Elvis' contribution to the influence of music is the greatest in rock history. Elvis Presley was born on January 8, 1935 in Tampenny, Michigan, Vernon Elvis Presley at 18 years old and Gladys Love Presley at 22 years old. Elvis Presley was born on Gladys Love Presley (née Smith) in Tupelo, Michigan on January 8, 1935, and his father, Vernon Elvis Presley, has created a shotgun room for two rooms. Jesse Gallon Presley, his identical twin brother, was sent 35 minutes before his death. Presley has a close relationship with his parents and has a particularly close relationship with his mother. The family attended the church of God's assembly where he found his first musical inspiration. On his mother's side, Presley's ancestors were Scottish Irish and French Norman. Gladys and other families clearly believe that her great-grandmother morning pigeon is Cherokee; the biography of Elaine Dundy supports this idea, but at least one pedigree researcher in many ways I asked a question. Vernon's ancestry was German or Scottish. Gladys is regarded as a family member from relatives and friends. Elvis Aaron Presley was born on January 8, 1935 in East Tupelo, Michigan, born in Née Gladys Love Smith and Vernon Elvis Presley. He has stubborn twin brothers. In 1948, Elvis and her parents moved to Memphis, Tennessee, where he went to Hume High School. In 1953, he took part in a high-level dance with the present girls Regis Wilson. After graduating from Memphis High School, Elvis served Royal Electric film guide and truck driver. He began singing "The Hillbilly Cat" locally, then contracted with a local record company and signed with RCA in 1955. The story of Elvis Presley's wonderful life started on January 8, 1935. Elvis · Aaron · Presley was born in Vernon and Gladys · Presley in Miss Tupper. Luo's 2 bedroom house. His twin brother, Jess Galleon, who died grew up from Elvis as a child. He and his parents moved to Memphis, Tennessee in 1948, and in 1953 Elvis graduated there from Hume 's High School. In 1954, Elvis started his career in Memphis's legendary San Record brand. At the end of 1955, his recording contract was sold to RCA Victor. By 1956, he was an international sensation. That sound and style uniquely combines his diverse musical influences, blurred and challenged the social and ethnic barriers of that era, and created a new era of American music and pop culture.

The main feature of the design controversy of the existence of God existence design theory is to shift from facts about the world to the existence of God. Therefore, they are generalized and tested after the test. The Design parameter is a broad heading that actually contains many arguments. Swinburne proposed three different classifications of these arguments in his book "The Existence of God". Teleological existence can be seen in a general pattern that is currently considered to be the order of the universe. Design controversy is an empirical argument against the existence of God. These arguments are made by inferring the existence of God as the best interpretation of these features, trying to identify the various empirical features of the world which usually (but not always) constitute the evidence of intelligent design. Because the concept of design and purpose is closely related, design argument is also called a theoretical argument and includes "terror", "target", or "purpose" in Greek. Discussion about the existence of God of William Perry and David Hume is called a theoretical argument or design theory. Discussion from design is an argument about the existence of God or some sort of creator based on thought of order or purpose in the universe. Hume took the way to oppose design arguments, and Paley defended it. - The fact that a criminal is using a gun to commit a crime is the only thing that infringes the rights of innocent people who own a gun. This is a problem that is causing regional problems. "A gun is just a tool that can be used for good and evil, our country is based on the belief that man is good until he or she is proved to be a different person One of the traditional themes of natural theology is the existence of God, one of which is discussion from design and theoretical arguments. Discussion is that the existence of God can be proved by an obvious design in the complexity of the world. EncyclopaediaBritannica says that this is "most popular, because the theoretical argument which is most easily available ... it deduces sacred designers and decides design evidence in nature ... as the whole as the universe It is a coherent fact as in this viewpoint, the same functional system also shows the wisdom of God behind it. "

"Skepticism" refers to the theory that we do not have knowledge, skepticism denies the existence of any reasonable beliefs. In this article we discuss the diversity of philosophical skepticism and explain various skeptical arguments and reactions to philosophical skepticism as well as Hume and Descartes. In this article we will also discuss various discussions and reasons for skepticism. Although skepticism and its discussions of various forms seem to be effective and theoretically justified, my position is against skepticism. The answer - apart from the doubt of the outside world - there is no philosophical debate on the realism of tropical fish, but it is an important philosophical challenge to scientific realism. The dimension of scientific realism understood as a philosophical position depends greatly on the reaction of scientific realists to these tasks. It is conceptually useful (and historically correct) to see the development of scientific realism as a response to four consecutive issues, as follows: "Skepticism" refers to the theory that we do not have knowledge, skepticism denies the existence of any reasonable beliefs. In this article we discuss the diversity of philosophical skepticism and explain various skeptical arguments and reactions to philosophical skepticism as well as Hume and Descartes. In this article we will also discuss various discussions and reasons for skepticism. Although skepticism and its discussions of various forms seem to be effective and theoretically justified, my position is against skepticism. It is easy to challenge the demands of knowledge by explicitly asking "How do you know", but this is not enough to prove that skepticism is an important position. Like other philosophical positions, skepticism must be supported by discussion. There are many arguments for defending skepticism and many answers have been provided for these discussions. Here we consider the two most prominent arguments that support skepticism about the outside world. In his first meditation, Rene Descartes proposed a debate that supported skepticism, then he tried to counter the later meditation. Discussion points out that some of our views are inaccurate. Our senses can deceive us; we sometimes mistake our dreams as calm experiences, the devils systematically deceive us.

As composers and performers, there is no doubt the definition of Mozart's genius and genius. The main definition is that genius is very big, rare natural ability and skill. This is a kind of creativity. Therefore, it is obvious that Mozart is indeed a genius of his music; · Since Amadeus Mozart turned out to be foolish, however, in what state, anywhere, also obvious God Need to have the character and behavior of a genius, a dirty, childish, "baby" person. Being a genius on one aspect of the mind like music may mean that the rest of the mind is suppressed like social skills. In the philosophy of Immanuel Kant, a genius is the ability to independently understand and understand the concepts others have to teach. For Kant, originality is an essential feature of genius. This genius is a creative talent and can be described as non imitation. Kant 's debate on genius' main function involved "Criticism of the trial", welcomed the early 19 th century romanticism. Also, theoretical and genius Schopenhauer's theory about personnel, especially from direct constraints from cant, determine the first paragraph of section criticism. In the philosophy of David Hume, the way society perceives genius resembles the way society recognizes ignorance. Hume said that people with genius characteristics are regarded as people who are not touched by people working at remote locations from society and other parts of the world. On the other hand, it alone is not a natural genius in the scientific era of the country where ignorant people are further insults, prosperity and what is not considered a reliable sign, but in the complete lack of all these noble noble entertainment Jinjin I will not go. The most perfect role must be somewhere between these two extremes; exquisite courtesy letters generated in conversation with retention insight; books, corporate and commercial equivalent ability and taste Maintaining, to business, is the obvious consequence of justice philosophy Accuracy and accuracy If you believe that performance is a genius, we will always recognize them as endings. As a sign of genius, the level works as a forehead with a rubber stamp and tells people what they can do. This grading is a symptom of conveyor belt education, quality control inspector regards the product as inappropriate product. Ignatius J Reilly identified a persecuted genius position. The same can be said to the agitator who is still fighting and the privilege classes and media forces behind it. For all savage foolish all are allies with them. Although concern about the needs of all parties dismissed in this process, it is felt that Keelly, Shanise and Doug can not mobilize their common base. In black life, so-called white garbage becomes commitment toxic exhaust gas of the United States, it is instructed to follow the United States again, it will remain in dangerous condition

Elvis Aaron Presley Elvis Aaron Presley was born in Tupelo on January 8, 1938, Miss. Elvis sang at the god choir. At the age of ten, Elvis won the school song competition, and he taught himself the guitar principle. Elvis' s family is very interesting. His parents are Gladys and Vernon. Elvis' twin brother Jessica Long died. The Presley family is very poor. His family are all very religious. The church is pleased with African American songs. When I was a high school student, Elvis Presley was very shy. The story of Elvis Presley's wonderful life started on January 8, 1935. Elvis · Aaron · Presley was born in Vernon and Gladys · Presley in Miss Tupper. Luo's 2 bedroom house. His twin brother, Jess Galleon, who died grew up from Elvis as a child. He and his parents moved to Memphis, Tennessee in 1948, and in 1953 Elvis graduated there from Hume 's High School. In 1954, Elvis started his career in Memphis's legendary San Record brand. At the end of 1955, his recording contract was sold to RCA Victor. By 1956, he was an international sensation. That sound and style uniquely combines his diverse musical influences, blurred and challenged the social and ethnic barriers of that era, and created a new era of American music and pop culture. Elvis Aaron Presley was born on January 8, 1935 in East Tupelo, Michigan, born in Née Gladys Love Smith and Vernon Elvis Presley. He has stubborn twin brothers. In 1948, Elvis and her parents moved to Memphis, Tennessee, where he went to Hume High School. In 1953, he took part in a high-level dance with the present girls Regis Wilson. After graduating from Memphis High School, Elvis served Royal Electric film guide and truck driver. He began singing "The Hillbilly Cat" locally, then contracted with a local record company and signed with RCA in 1955. Elvis Aaron Presley, an actor and musician born in Tupelo, Mississippi on January 8, 1935. From a very unobtrusive beginning, Elvis Presley grew into one of the biggest names in the history of music. Some people dislike the influence of Elvis Presley, but Elvis influences the world of music. I do not spend most of Preste's family prepaid by the working-class, compassionate parents. The Elvis Presleys family often moved from one place to another. Elvis respected his mother Gladys, his parents, especially Presley, who gave me strong faith and trust to God. Presley and his parents attended the church, the church of God. Gospel music has great influence on him, it helps his career

Various forms of cosmological arguments on the cosmological argument of the existence of God are recognized arguments against the existence of God, which is also called the first argument. The basis of cosmology is the first reason the universe exists, this is God. It has taken many forms and has been presented in many ways in the past. Many philosophers are proposing such philosophers such as Plato, Aquinas, Socrates, Hume, Kant, their views. Like most arguments about the existence of God, cosmological arguments exist in many forms; here two are discussed: cosmological arguments of time, Kalam (ie the first argument), and division Discussion of style. The main difference between these two arguments is that they avoid the first opposition to the argument and cast the question "is there a reason for that existence in God?" Then suppose that God exists to explain the existence of the universe and we will not take us anywhere. Without God, we have an entity that we can not explain, there is a universe; there is an entity with God, we can not explain, that is God. Discussion that is most widely accepted and criticized about the existence of God. My purpose in this article is to explain why cosmological arguments are proof of the existence of God, to understand that it is the importance of posteriori posteriori discussion, and to my common argument It is to observe the position of. First of all, as a living person on earth, we can safely conclude that the majority of things that exist today have their cause. I confirmed that there is a reason. There are many arguments about the existence of God to try to prove the existence of God. In this article we will discuss ontological discussions, cosmological arguments, empirical discussions, such as avoiding errors and design arguments. There is much criticism about each of these, and the existence of God can not prove that it might be stronger than those who speak more strongly. The insisting definition of God is a god of Christianity ... I have found Akinas' theory that the existence of God is very interesting. It is easy to understand and logical. Summa Theologiae is one of the best works of Aquinas. St. Thomas is also a writer, writing a lot of comments on Aristotle and other theological and philosophical themes. Aquinas divides his argument into five ways to prove the existence of God. The first method is sports debate. There are many things that are changing, but not all of a sudden starts.

The term "paparazzi" is defined as "freelance photographer pursuing pictures of celebrities". (Definition of Palazzo, 2011) The name was born from the photographer's last name in the 1960 film "Ladruche Vita". (Green) However, the meaning of the word paparazzo is more meaningful than a freelance photographer. Paparazzi is notorious for their long-term and annoying personality, and they do whatever they wish to get the shots they want. The main purpose of Paparazzi is to attract celebrities from the general public. Many times, media and paparazzi were too far to get a story or picture of life. According to Camillemore these are some cases where paparazzi really crossed the line. Chris Brown and Tory Spell: Although it was in two different places and situations, both celebrities were chasing a car with a paparazzi, so celebrities tried to run away by hitting the wall. Arnold Schwarzenegger: Mr. Schwarzenegger and his wife were boxed in their cars driven by paparazzi and trapped in their seats. Justin Bieber: In 2014, after chasing the car he believed to belonged to Bieber, the photographer was killed. Nicole Kidman: Kidman was hit by paparazzi with his bike at a speed of 20 miles per hour, and he could not stop fast enough after he followed Kidman 's car. When Kanye West arrived at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center on 23rd October 2002, there was no rear paparazzi, a blessing about fans and industries. Hospital officials saw bright stars dying under their care. That publication quickly wrote a buried article of 100 words to be hidden. Nobody cares about it or knows it. His body was hurt by light abrasions and abrasions. His jaw fracture requires urgent reconstruction. It seems like a punishment rather than a rapper for an up and coming producer who insists on hearing. Close friends and family insist that it is lucky that he is alive Allen Hume said, "This is not the current situation that stalkarazzi" goes far "- that reporters are completely wrong. They are confusing the news with sports. " It is too far. All papers are expected to be superior to the following papers and should be incredibly wonderful. It was pushed far away and ended in a fatal way. The news industry has certainly experienced an era of change, and due to this tragic event it has not been promoted extremely. The media may try to behave like a less annoying story, it does not go to such extreme. But this is impossible and will not last. After Princess Diana's death, paparazzi returned to its original state.

Introduction Have you ever heard the rock and roll legend? Elvis Presley is one of them. People's opinion for Elvis Presley is "to do so if Mr. Presley likes it" (inattentive love.295) Excellent singers and great actors influenced America in the 1960s . Changing the history of rock and roll Elvis Presley has changed the history of rock music. Although he changed his musical style, he broke all record sales forecasts. ("Presley, Elvis") Elvis fans clearly like him very much, whatever singing he sings, they always support him there. The story of Elvis Presley's wonderful life started on January 8, 1935. Elvis · Aaron · Presley was born in Vernon and Gladys · Presley in Miss Tupper. Luo's 2 bedroom house. His twin brother, Jess Galleon, who died grew up from Elvis as a child. He and his parents moved to Memphis, Tennessee in 1948, and in 1953 Elvis graduated there from Hume 's High School. In 1954, Elvis started his career in Memphis's legendary San Record brand. At the end of 1955, his recording contract was sold to RCA Victor. By 1956, he was an international sensation. That sound and style uniquely combines his diverse musical influences, blurred and challenged the social and ethnic barriers of that era, and created a new era of American music and pop culture. Elvis Aaron Presley, an actor and musician born in Tupelo, Mississippi on January 8, 1935. From a very unobtrusive beginning, Elvis Presley grew into one of the biggest names in the history of music. Some people dislike the influence of Elvis Presley, but Elvis influences the world of music. I do not spend most of Preste's family prepaid by the working-class, compassionate parents. The Elvis Presleys family often moved from one place to another. Elvis respected his mother Gladys, his parents, especially Presley, who gave me strong faith and trust to God. Presley and his parents attended the church, the church of God. Gospel music has great influence on him, it helps his career

Interview with artists The artist / illustrator I chose to contact is Mark McKee. He is an illustrator and designer of World Industrial Corporation, a skateboard and snowboard company. Some of his work was controversial, and he filed a lawsuit several times. This is particularly suitable for designs similar to boards with the look of Winnie the Pooh and books by L. Ron Hubbard. But I especially like his original work, especially the boy of fire and the devil on the smile side. Contacting him is not too difficult; I have found a number of industries in the world with a snowboard magazine. Exclusive Interview: You and Grammy Award winning artist B.J. Thomas will sit down in good faith and talk about decades of relationship with Memphis. As a result of this interview titled "When Memphis comes back", the legendary singer unveiled the feelings singing with Elvis Presley at the 1968 New Year 's party, Thunderbird Lounge. He revisited his wonderful friendship with composer Mark James. The underestimated Chips Moman and Memphis boys, and a fascinating story behind them ("Hey, you do not play" another person made a wrong song. Friday from 2 pm to 6 pm. George Klein rotated, interviewed and talked about all Elvis Presley, CST "Elvis Time" of Sirius XM satellite radio, Memphis legends. This encyclopedia rock and roll supplier has been broadcasting for 64 years and witnessed the dawn of his favorite music type. Since the eighth grade, two friends were 13 years old when I met, but this friendship lasted 29 years, until Presley was badly for prescription drug abuse. To explain their endless connection, Klein witnessed Presley playing "cold, cold, cool fingers" with a broken acoustic guitar at a talented show at Hume High School. I was watching an interview with Rap Radar Wale and Elliot Wilson and Brian "B. Dot" Miller's Rap Radar Podcast, I got on my phone in the next hour 25 minutes. During the interview, they discussed a series of topics: label owner Rick Ross's health, the current social atmosphere, the music production process, and the inevitable theme of women's Welle. When Wol no longer wanted to hurt, and said he did not want to bring his nonsense around his love, it resonated with me. I am now in the stage of recognizing all my flaws and the process of change itself is a task. Self-destruction is often thought, as it tends to criticize and criticize everything that brings us closer to death.

As I learned through course studies and lectures, due to my prejudice against Anselm 's ontological debate. I hope that Descartes aside these prejudices, present two articles on his "first meditation" to explore the two aspects of the discussion and try to reach independent conclusions. However, I would like to get the same conclusion as before - that is, ontological arguments can be argued based on fundamental differences between concepts of existence in our minds and concepts of reality I can do it. The ontological debate was first criticized by Gaunilo of Modern Marmoutiers of Canterbury Anselm. He believes that ontological arguments can be used to prove the existence of something using full island analogies. This discussion was also criticized by famous Catholic philosophers Thomas Aquinas, David Hume and Emmanuel Kant. In order to correctly understand ontological arguments, it is necessary to identify the meaning of philosophers when talking about 'possible world'. "Possible world" may refer to facts contrary to facts. For those in "a possible world", it simply means that its existence is logically possible. Perhaps the most complicated and challenging argument for the existence of God is an ontological argument proposed by Anselm of Canterbury. According to Anselm, God exists in God with the most perfect concept of existence - the existence which can not be imagined - because there are essentially perfect and nonexistent beings as large as existence. Everything is perfect, no one exists. This discussion has a lasting influence on philosophers; some believe it will try to 'define' the existence of God while others keep it and continue developing a new version I will. Ontological arguments are transcendental arguments. These arguments try to prove the existence of God from the meaning of the word God. Anselm of Canterbury introduced an ontological argument to his work 'Proslogion'. The classic argument of Anselm is based on two principles, the most important of which are St. Anselm and Rene de Carte of the above Canterbury. If he does not exist you can still think of a larger being (as you said that there is no God other than this existence). Presence must be one of the attributes of God. Because by removing it it is still possible for you to understand the bigger god (the god that exists). The most common problem with this discussion is that it only seems to enumerate the existence of God's attributes and does not seem to indicate it. This argument seems to indicate that any fact you can imagine should be true.

In some variations of the story there are also some by-products, Peter may be pretty selfish and arrogant. For example, Peter calls a fool of a disappointing boy as a book that he is, but says Daring's children should go home at once. Elvis Presley - His full name is Elvis Aaron Presley and is also the king of America's singer, musician, actor, king of rock 'n' roll, born in January 1935 "nicknamed". On August 16, 1977, in Tupelo, Tennessee, he died on Memphis, Tennessee on August 8. His spouse is Priscilla Presley from 1967 to 1973. I lived that year. Elvis Presley was born on Gladys Love Presley (née Smith) in Tupelo, Michigan on January 8, 1935, and his father, Vernon Elvis Presley, has created a shotgun room for two rooms. Jesse Gallon Presley, his same twin brother, was sent 35 minutes before his death. Presley has a close relationship with his parents and has a particularly close relationship with his mother. The family attended the church of God's assembly where he found his first musical inspiration. On his mother's side, Presley's ancestors were Scottish Irish and French Norman. Gladys and other families clearly believe that her great-grandmother morning pigeon is Cherokee; the biography of Elaine Dundy supports this idea, but at least one pedigree researcher in many ways I asked a question. Vernon's ancestry was German or Scottish. Gladys is regarded as a family member from relatives and friends. Elvis Aaron Presley was born on January 8, 1935 in East Tupelo, Michigan, born in Née Gladys Love Smith and Vernon Elvis Presley. He has stubborn twin brothers. In 1948, Elvis and her parents moved to Memphis, Tennessee, where he went to Hume High School. In 1953, he took part in a high-level dance with the present girls Regis Wilson. After graduating from Memphis High School, Elvis served Royal Electric film guide and truck driver. He began singing "The Hillbilly Cat" locally, then contracted with a local record company and signed with RCA in 1955.

I oppose the ability of science to prove that I believe in God is absurd. Science does this by showing that it can not answer even simple questions about where the law came from and how they are formed. If science can not even answer this simple question, how does it answer more difficult questions? Science can not answer the question of whether God exists or not, so it can not make belief in God unreasonable. Since the scope of science is limited, I have questions that I can not answer. Hume's claim is intended to show that faith in God is literally irrational. It is beyond the realm of reason. Hume does not support faith, but points to the status of God. Those who accept Hum's position for the God in the investigation understand that believing in God has no reason to support it, so it must float in the air as if it were a wizard's trick It is. We will face the consequences of this theological belief. But for most theologians their beliefs will collapse if they understand that their faith in God is not supported by reason. I oppose the ability of science to prove that I believe in God is absurd. Science does this by showing that it can not answer even simple questions about where the law came from and how they are formed. If science can not even answer this simple question, how does it answer more difficult questions? Science can not answer the question of whether God exists or not, so it can not make belief in God unreasonable. - When God created the heavens and the earth, he also wanted to create something reflecting his image. He wants to create more things. The earth was created by him, and in doing so, he believes that creating a human can benefit the planet and beyond all around it. In Genesis 1: 26-27, God talks about how he created humans in his image. The degree of agreement between science and religion can be seen in the science of religion and experience. To believe that God created the world, that is, to create a human, can lead him to arrange for human understanding of the world. This is undertaken by the doctrine of image dei. In Thomas Aquinas' words, "Because human beings are considered to be statues of God due to their intelligent nature, this property can be embodied in the image of God for imitation of God ".

18th century philosopher: Relatively "enlighten" or "realization era" is the era of all progress and reforms throughout Europe and Europe. There was great progress in the fields of science, philosophy, mathematics and logic. Most people attribute these results to social critics of that age (also known as philosophers). These philosophers were controversial thinkers and pioneered the intellectual movement of the 1700s. They are often criticized and criticized by many others, but they insist on their beliefs. In the center of the enlightenment of the 18th century, there was a gently organized activity of famous French thinkers in the mid 18th century, the so-called "philosophy" (eg Voltaire, De Allenbell, Diderot, Montesquieu). These philosophies constitute an informal society of letters participating in broadly defined awareness projects such as the Encyclopedia project (see 5 below). However, there are other education centers noteworthy noteworthy of France. Moses Mendelssohn, General Electric Lessing, key figures including German enlightenment (Death Crown, Christian Wolf), famous Scottish enlightenment (key figures are Francis Hutchison, Adam Smith, David Hume, Thomas Reed) And Emmanuel Kant are also the center of thinkers of enlightenment and enlightenment scattered throughout Europe and the United States in the 18th century. Another time of major change is the 18th century or Age of Enlightenment. Despite its presence in Europe, the origin of enlightenment is closely related to France and its philosophers such as Voltaire and Rousseau. Enlightenment was inspired by the main discovery of the scientific revolution of the 17th century. It was during this time that the idea of ​​scientific revolution was spread and spread by philosophers (intellectuals of the 18th century). The age of enlightenment of the 18th century was born most accurately from the scientific revolution of the 17th century. The seeds planted there will bloom like Age of Enlightenment. A philosopher may be the most influential person of this era. The philosophy of the 18th century was influenced by the great achievements of the great thinkers of the 17th century such as Newton, Galileo, Kepler. As mentioned above, these thinkers are pursuing discovery in the glory of God. However, since philosophy has ideas all over the world, it is entirely against any religious intervention. Philosophers are critics of the world in which they live. They are most interested in criticizing politics and religion. They do this in the form of literary texts such as books, leaflets, encyclopedias.

Common beliefs of most people, people's voices. Public opinion is a general viewpoint. Opinion attracts public attention to decision makers / decision makers' attention. Public opinion is the opinion that the government must pay attention. According to Norman Luttbeg, public opinion is reflected in five models. Rational - Activist model, voters use elections as policy expressions. Individual citizens are expected to participate positively in politics, participation, rationality, and most importantly (p. 19). Public opinion is a citizen's perception of politics and government behavior. There are three reasons for this: (1) citizen's political behavior is driven by their opinion; (2) public opinion helps to explain the behavior of candidates, political parties and other political actors. (3) Public opinion can also clarify the reasons for specific policy outcome. The vast majority of public opinion information is usually obtained from extensive research. Its purpose is to measure attitudes of people in a particular group or people in the group. Because it is often impossible to interview all members of a large group, investigations usually include samples between hundreds and thousands of people. Common beliefs of most people, people's voices. Public opinion is a general viewpoint. Opinion attracts public attention to decision makers / decision makers' attention. Public opinion is the opinion that the government must pay attention. According to Norman Luttbeg, public opinion is reflected in five models. Rational - Activist model, voters use elections as policy expressions. - ... For example I asked: "... Should the federal government adopt a more transparent citizenship approach?" This question initially raised the concept of transparency within the government. I have the impression that transparency is necessary. In Chong's article "How do people think, infer, and feel about rights and freedoms" I have found a motivation to propose concrete questions rather than unresolved. Public opinion is very important to politics. As the Scottish philosopher David Hume said, "only the government can therefore be established" 29 The public opinion is the basis of political power and legitimacy, and any government has a safety within the relevant group You can obtain security. We will gladly agree with this rule. We need to understand not only the democratic government but also the functions of the public domain. Hostile public opinion can pose a threat to democracy and authoritarian regime. In the context of authoritarianism, hostile public opinion will be built underground and eventually there is the possibility that the political order will collapse. By mobilizing public opinion, the opposition group may be able to gather a number of support and proposals for framework reform, and the government may be obliged to pay attention. In the worst case, the divided group may confuse the public domain and cause political turmoil or even violence.

Since it is very difficult to define certain words in English, giving meaning to them is a fierce discussion among thinkers. The way to define such an abstract word, its definition and purpose greatly depends on country, language, language, and people. Before others can propose more precise definitions than current leaders, people can only want to grasp the concept of these words. The reason for defining these words is the same as those changes, because their meaning is based on the final result of the opinion. McDowell: I do not think he even heard what we said, as we often say. The country under God is indivisible and has freedom and justice for all. Justice for all people means economic, social and criminal justice. This is what the Democratic Party of Japan is representing, it is in everyone. McDowell: I think it depends on what happens at that time. First of all, I do not know if it happened before the 2018 election. If he is somewhat elastic that we can weaken the structure and texture of our government and our lifestyle, that is definitely it. I think that the happiness of this country comes from all kinds of party game skills. Justice is one of the most important moral and political concepts. That word comes from the words of Latin, meaning rights and laws. The Oxford English Dictionary defines "ordinary people" as "usually morally correct action" and gives the word "fair" as a synonym for "giving each person their own rights". However, philosophers transcend the definition of etymology and dictionary, such as the nature of justice being regarded as the character of personality and the quality of ideal political society, and how it is applied to moral and social decision making I think that I want to do it. This article will focus on the concept of justice in Western philosophy. These will be the largest theories of ancient Greece (Plato and Aristotle), medieval Christianity (Augustin and Aquinas), two early modern times (Hobbes and Hume), and two modernities (Kant and Mill). And some modern (role and some successors)

Many of us have dreams of life and I remember everyone as a wonderful thing. This is a very high goal. Elvis Presley is one of the few people in our history that has achieved this position. Known as "King of Rock", his achievement has influenced our country just like its precedent. In this article I will explain the life of Elvis Presley, his death, and the serious impact of his life. On January 8, 1935, "The King of Rock" was born in Tupelo, Mississippi. The story of Elvis Presley's wonderful life started on January 8, 1935. Elvis · Aaron · Presley was born in Vernon and Gladys · Presley in Miss Tupper. Luo's 2 bedroom house. His twin brother, Jess Galleon, who died grew up from Elvis as a child. He and his parents moved to Memphis, Tennessee in 1948, and in 1953 Elvis graduated there from Hume 's High School. In 1954, Elvis started his career in Memphis's legendary San Record brand. At the end of 1955, his recording contract was sold to RCA Victor. By 1956, he was an international sensation. That sound and style uniquely combines his diverse musical influences, blurred and challenged the social and ethnic barriers of that era, and created a new era of American music and pop culture. Elvis Presley was born in Tupelo, Mississippi, USA on January 8, 1935. He is an American actor and singer. He is also known as the most important cultural symbol of the 20th century. Elvis Presley began his musical career in 1954. Presley's first RCA single "Heartbreak Hotel" was released in January 1956. Elvis Presley 's first movie was "Love Me Tender" in 1956. His most popular is "The King of Rocks". Read Elvis Presley quotes Elvis Presley was born on Gladys Love Presley (née Smith) in Tupelo, Michigan on January 8, 1935, and his father, Vernon Elvis Presley, has created a shotgun room for two rooms. Jesse Gallon Presley, his identical twin brother, was sent 35 minutes before his death. Presley has a close relationship with his parents and has a particularly close relationship with his mother. The family attended the church of God's assembly where he found his first musical inspiration. On his mother's side, Presley's ancestors were Scottish Irish and French Norman. Gladys and other families clearly believe that her great-grandmother morning pigeon is Cherokee; the biography of Elaine Dundy supports this idea, but at least one pedigree researcher in many ways I asked a question. Vernon's ancestry was German or Scottish. Gladys is regarded as a family member from relatives and friends.

Freedom of choice "James Joyce was born on February 2, 1882 in Dublin" (Joyce I). In 1914, from the perspective of Joyce, Dublin 's work depicting the lives of people in Dublin was on the shelf (Joyce I). The book consists of fifteen short stories about Dublin. These short stories have various themes, but one of the most important topics of this book is escape. The book also has a philosophical point of view covering many other topics: topics like autonomy and responsibility. Let's return to the average Americans and clarify the relationship between the freedom of choice and the dilemma. He has a poor "freedom of choice". But let's see his choice. He can buy various medical plans - but they do not cover much, and they are all deadly. He can apply for a million jobs - but none of them can provide him with a reasonable retirement level, leisure, trust, income, stability, opportunity, and maneuverability . He can choose hundreds from thousands of cable channels - but they are not close to pornography about fat man, ancient aliens, conspiracy theory, expert experts TV shows and BBC Documentary etc etc. He has the choice - this is true. But his choice adds to the dilemma because they are all bad: a decision between two or more wrong choices Free choice While social freedom refers to two actors and their actions, freedom of choice represents the relationship between an actor and a series of alternative potential behaviors. "A has free choice of x or z" means that A is more likely to perform x or z, or that both x and z are open. Conversely, if A is either impossible or unnecessary, A has no freedom to choose x. In this sense, Hume defines freedom as "ability to act according to decision of decision or power not to act". The freedom of choice is neither a necessary condition of social freedom nor a sufficient condition. If A can not do x, he will only do this if his incompetence is caused by some other actor B. Otherwise, even if he does not have the freedom of choice for x, A can free x.

The main ethical question raised in the Adelphia Communications litigation is that the Rigas family acts in a morally meaningful way by lying and stealing, causing public distrust, or their actions against investors Whether it is morally acceptable as prevention or not. Negative Impact We will verify the first act committed first. John Rigas may argue that he tried to protect his investor by lying to the company's financial situation to increase existing capital and future profits. Moral Papers - Kant Ethics. Explanation of Kant's liability concept Emmanuel Kant is a German philosopher focused on creating a logical and absolute moral theory and does not change according to circumstances, John Rock and the others . An empiricist at the time. His ethics is based on responsibility, not the final product of action. His theory is very important, he thinks it can be compared with the Copernicus revolution. Kant's ethic is used as a (predominantly worthy) label of Kant's moral lineage but a series of contemporary moral standings different from Canto. His work is difficult and systematic. Understanding them helps to divide the study into three categories: his writings, work of early critics, and modern work strongly influenced by Kant. For the most part of this section I will explain the ethical aspects of Hum's ethics Kant, but I would like to start with a brief overview of Kant's mature moral philosophy. This is done by explaining five important functions for Kant's ethics. This helps to take this into account when dealing with Kant 's response to Hume' s ethics. Second, Kant's concept of autonomy is one of the more central, unique and influential aspects of his ethics. Kant defines autonomy as "an attribute of will" and itself is a law (it is independent from the attribute of the object of will) "(G 4: 440). According to Kant, it is autonomous because the will of the moral actor gives moral law to itself (which is self-legal) and can bind or motivate himself to comply with the law.

Yellow wallpaper The feminist side of Charlotte Perkins Gilman's yellow wallpaper can be read in various ways. Some people think that this is a tragic horror story, others think that it is a story of a woman trying to find her identity in a society controlled by men. The story is based on the plot of Gilman's life when she had a neurological disorder called depression. Male experts suggested that she "live in the country as much as possible ... please do not use pen, brush, pencil" (Gilman, 669). She followed these guidelines for three months until approaching nervous weakness. Still, Gilman decided to continue writing, The autobiographical aspect of "yellow wallpaper" is convincing, but its symbolic meaning and potential feministic meaning is the most interesting one. First is the narrator 's husband, John. As Beverly Hume said, he can be regarded as patriarchal itself. 478). Many paragraphs about her husband can be interpreted as including the satire, many including satire, and some imitation limits (Johnson 528). Certainly, although the husband's words are exaggerated at times, it seems extreme to consider the husband's character as a manga. Instead, he naturally complements the mad cowardice fantasies of the narrator. John's character is control and "intelligence" defined by Victorian culture. Yellow wallpaper The feminist side of Charlotte Perkins Gilman's yellow wallpaper can be read in various ways. Some people think that this is a tragic horror story, others think that it is a story of a woman trying to find her identity in a society controlled by men. The story is based on the plot of Gilman's life when she had a neurological disorder called depression. Male experts ask her to "go as far as possible in the house ... do not touch the pen ... rewrite the yellow wallpaper" Elizabeth Kay Stanton and Charlotte Perkins Gilman said "Stein 1895 Stein 1895 Stein 1895 Stein 1895 Stein 1895 Stein 1895 Stein 1895 Stein 1895 Stein 1895 Stein 1895 Stein 1895 Stein 1895 Stein 1895 Stein 1895 Dunton announced her personal attack on the "female Bible", a religion organized in the female world.

Rawls proposed a theory of political social contract based on the principle of justice as justice; its aim is to create a procedural principle of "social basic structure". The basic structure of the Rawlsian society includes all the political, social and economic systems of society, and how they are integrated into a unified whole. Principle Rawls states that the first principle of modern systems is "justice is fair", focusing on the distribution of fundamental social goods such as rights, products, obligations, freedoms, how to sing and how to sing are specified I have not. Born in Baltimore, Maryland in 1921, John Rawls is the second son of Baltimore's most influential attorney, William Lee Rolls and his wife, Anna Abel Stewart Rolls. . When young, Rawls and his family were shocked by two tragedies. When he was eight years old, Rawls developed infectious bacterial diphtheria. He recovered but his younger brother infected with a disease from him did not die due to complications. A year later, Rolls suffered from pneumonia. Another brother died of being infected with him. John Bordley Rawls is one of the most influential philosophers of the 20th century. He was born on February 21, 1921, the son of Baltimore, Maryland, William Lee Rolls and Anna Abel (stump). Rawls received a Bachelor of Arts degree from Princeton University in 1943. During World War II, he worked in the military and was stationed in the Pacific Ocean. From 1947 to 1948 he studied at Cornell University and in 1950 received a PhD in Princeton University. In 1949, he married Margaret Warfield Fox with four children. John Rawls is a 20th century American philosopher specializing in the fields of ethics, political philosophy, and law philosophy. Rawls is considered by many as the most important political philosopher of the 20th century and his symbolic "justice" is trying to combine many competitive political theories that are thought to be incompatible It is praised for what he did. In the nineteenth century, political philosophy divided Karl Marx's radical equalityism and concept of individual freedom and freedom acknowledged by John Stuart Mill. Rolls rejected Marx's communism and Mill's utilitarianism, returned to the early modern social contract model, and was influenced by Rock, Rousseau, Hume, and Kant and formed his own theoretical version . Rawls' philosophy has been widely praised, but it produced two books contrary to justice theory.

However, the copyright law varies from country to country, and the copyrighted work of the country which accessed this site may still be protected by copyright. Before downloading this work, it is your responsibility to check the copyright law applicable in your country. A paper on human understanding, 89 John Locke, was compiled and annotated by Alexander Campbell Fraser (New York: Dover Press, 1959) for overture, biography, criticism and history. After that (unless otherwise stated), the paper is cited in ECHU and the chapter number is written according to the convention of book / chapter / subheading. 93 Rock sometimes despises the prophecies of the Old Testament, and these prophecies do not agree with his view on abnormal God's revelation. For example, "Brought about in the usual sense of God and mankind is evident in the Spirit of God in the Old Testament, or it is assumed that the Spirit of God comes to the art of textile and embroidery in educational places Must". Inspiration Now, "Religious Writings", Edit. Victor Nuovo (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2002), 38 "Papers on human understanding" is research based on John Rock's knowledge and understanding of humans. It first appeared in 1689 (although the date was 1690), it was printed under the heading "Papers on Humanitarian Understanding". He expressed his birth mind as a blank state (he did not use real words, but tabla lasa) and then filled it with experience. This article is one of the main sources of empiricism in contemporary philosophy and has influence many awareness philosophers such as David Hume and George Berkeley. John Rock's Human Understanding Papers In John Rock's "Papers on Human Understanding," he distinguishes between the various ideas that we can imagine with object perception. Locke separates these concepts into primary and secondary quality. Any criticism for this distinction is necessary, otherwise perception will be coincidental. - Both John Rock and Thomas Hobbs believe that men are essentially equal, but their personal view on equality suggests a fundamentally different approach to proper citizenship I guided you to do. Locke believes that the right form of civilian government should pay attention to common interests of people and protect citizens' rights to life, health, freedom and personal property.

When questioning the possibility of an aesthetic judgment criterion, we need to consider many different opinions already existing. For centuries, great philosophers like David Hume and Emanuel Kant tried to answer this eternal question. However, understanding and interpretation of art continues to evolve. This makes it difficult to find clear and concise answers. Throughout this article, we will discuss and explain in more detail the previous views and opinions on this point, focusing on the philosopher David Hume's idea, then criticism of Noel Carroll's Hume's philosophy. The discussion on "aesthetics" in daily aesthetics is not unique to this discourse. Whether it is art, nature, pop culture or everyday objects or activities, the essence of aesthetics has always been the focus of long-term discussion in aesthetics. However, in the concept of "aesthetics" in daily aesthetics, at least two points are particularly meaningful and important. The first one is a state of physical experience. When you get sensory stimulation you can feel the smell of baked goods, the silky feel of the skin, the taste of sushi, the feeling of massage and so on. They can also come from physical activity such as running, cutting vegetables, using tools or mowing lawn. Discussion as to whether these physical emotions belong to aesthetics is not new. Part of the misunderstanding of aesthetics lies in the word itself. In its original broadest meaning, aesthetics means pleasure or painful feeling that human beings feel through sensation. In this sense, regardless of coincidence or design, all products have aesthetic appeal. The sound of closing the door, the texture of the control surface, the visual appearance of the software interface information, the smell of plastic and metal, the taste of the medicine: everything is an example of a formal aesthetic element. Over time, aesthetics has a second, more limited meaning as aesthetic research and theory. The psychological, social, cultural and philosophical meaning of aesthetics is a complex and deep subject. One way to understand the state of aesthetics in design is how to guide human perception products.

This paper is based on the use of Utilitarian individualism - collectivism, personal personal interests of individuals or dimensions of differences in common interests of groups, and ontological individualism - collectivism, ie the superiority of individuals or groups as a basic society Distinguish dimension. Entity Utilitarian fluctuations have been studied in many studies on individualism - collectivism, but point out that the ontological changes are not drawing much attention from the research, and these two dimensions are the beliefs of the organization It may also affect behavior and behavior. Aftertissivist individualism - After pointing out that the collectivist dimension maps differences in self concept definitions, this paper describes the impact of these differences on organizational motivation and identity research. In this article, in the context of New Zealand, in order to introduce individualism (collectivism) into four ethnic groups (New Zealand, Europe, New Zealand, Maori, Pacific Islands and China), individualism - collectivist interpersonal relationship I will use the evaluation. Discovery of differences at the individual level. Inventory (ICIAI) was developed by Matsumoto, Preston, Brown, and Kuppersbusch (1997). In this survey, we tested the reliability of the ICIAI tool for various ethnic groups and the influence of these ethnic groups on general values ​​and behaviors in three social situations (families, friends, and strangers) did. There were 400 participants (36% NZE, 20.8% Mori, 18.5% Chinese, 14.3% PI). In the context of New Zealand this scale is effective and reliable across cultures, and it helps to develop cross-cultural equivalents for individual differences. This paper is based on the use of Utilitarian individualism - collectivism, personal personal interests of individuals or dimensions of differences in common interests of groups, and ontological individualism - collectivism, ie the superiority of individuals or groups as a basic society Distinguish dimension. Entity Utilitarian fluctuations have been studied in many studies on individualism - collectivism, but point out that the ontological changes are not drawing much attention from the research, and these two dimensions are the beliefs of the organization It may also affect behavior and behavior. Aftertissivist individualism - After pointing out that the collectivist dimension maps differences in self concept definitions, this paper describes the impact of these differences on organizational motivation and identity research. The ancient Greek philosopher Xenophanes apparently appeared in the form of an ontological argument and appeared in works of Parmenides, Plato and Neo-Platonics, but the mainstream view is that its ontological debate is first I believe. It was expressed and developed by Ansem of Canterbury. . Some scholars believe that Islamic philosopher Ibn Sina developed a special ontological argument before Anselm, but other scholars expressed doubts about this position. Daniel Donbrowsky marks the three major stages of the development of the debate: the first explicit expression of Anselm; the criticism of Kant and Hume in the 18th century; and the theory of the proposition of the 20th century philosopher in Anselm The second ontological point

Inflation Causes There are three main reasons for inflation. Demand - Promote Inflation Cost - Promote Theoretical Demand for Inflation Money - Promote Inflation ================== === == This type of inflation depends on excess demand Caused and exceeded the total supply. Simply put, to "track too few items is too much demand." This is due to the extremely strong growth in aggregate demand, which occurs when the total supply does not correspond quickly enough, leading to price increases. Historically, an enormous number of economic literatures have focused on the causes and their impacts of inflation. There are various ways of thinking about the cause of inflation. Most of them are divided into two major fields. Inflation quality theory and quantitative theory of inflation. The quality inflation theory depends on the seller's expectation of accepting currency, so you can exchange it later as a product of the buyer. Quantitative inflation theory depends on the quantity of money related to money supply, the speed of currency distribution and the equation of nominal value of exchange. Adam Smith and David Hume proposed quantitative theory of currency inflation and qualitative theory of production inflation. According to research that has been done so far, the cause of inflation varies, which leads to confused thought of economic experts who believe that inflation is caused by quality or quantity theory (macroeconomics, item 1) . Quality theory is that the seller of goods hides the goods only when the demand is high and the quantity depends on the circulation or flow of domestic money supply. One of the main reasons for inflation is government activity; this is when the government uses extra money to respond to certain crises. An increase in domestic excess supply of money lowers the value of money, and commodity prices rise from this decline, leading to inflation (Mishkin, p. 68). We wrote many questions about inflation in the article: How does money supply influence our inflation rate? Inflation is the cause and influence of inflation. One key to understanding inflation is the multiplier of money. "Score reserve system" Because banks only need to use a small portion of deposits as "spares" to offset potential withdrawals, banks can lend the bulk of deposits to earn interest I will. This will increase multiples of money supply due to the multiplication effect. This "lever" is effective in every direction.

Visitors: Although God wants to prevent evil, can not you? Then he is helpless. He's okay, is not it intended? Then he is evil. Is he capable and pleased? Then, where does evil come from? Can not he help? So why are you calling him God? "Why do not we talk about the Old Testament? Will not you explain all the stories of the Old Testament to me? Wait a moment, it's rape, homicide, slavery, homosexuals and There are a lot of people killing the gods, we should not rape or possess 10 slave slaves, he will be depressed Epicurus said that God hopes to prevent evil and can not do it or can not do it, or does not want it, or does not want it, or is pleased or not pleased, or is willing to delight. If he is willing and helpless, he is weak and it does not match God's personality. If he is competent and reluctant, he is malicious and does not adapt to God's personality. If he is glad and can not do it, he is not a god at all because he is a vicious and weak person. If he wants to fit God alone and is capable, what sources are evil? Why did not he stop them? (Lactantius, de Ira Dei (313 AD); Epicurus's first evil problem version formula Epicurus first described the problem of evil in detail. In his dialogue on nature's religion (1779), David Hume cited Epicurus to state this argument as a series of questions: "God wants to prevent evil, but is helpless And is he helpless, does he have both abilities and intentions then is it evil? Can neither he nor help, then why is he calling him God? , The God of a personal Christian is considered to be a logically contradictory quality These atheists are proposing deductive arguments against the existence of God God is the integrity of the creator We insist on incompatibility between specific features such as status, invariance, omniscience, totipotency, omni-directionality, transcendence, personality etc. Personal existence), justice, justice, compassion

Plato and Aristotle Plato and Aristotle were the two philosophers of the 4th century and had views on politics and philosophy. Raphael's Athens Academy (1510-11, Stanza della Segnatura, Vatican) is a subtle example of the fact that Plato is drawn as a high-level form and Aristotle supports the natural sciences I condemned it. In the discussion of politics, the position of each philosopher is an essential element. Plato pointed out that it is not a coincidence that the philosopher ruler rich in knowledge should be a governor of the city state in "Republic". Author: Gerard · Cretian Plato and Aristotle Many modern experts believe Plato was the first true political philosophy, Aristotle is the first political scholar. They are the foundation of Socrates's great thinker and great Western philosopher. Plato and Aristotle each have ideas on how to improve their society during their existence. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze their different theories with this heavy metaphysical speculation. In conclusion, Hume wishes to limit metaphysical speculation to one field and is not so inclined to such a fate. Aristotle and Plato's excellence is a function, and what makes it a function is the definition of Plato's virtue. What does this definition mean? Both Plato and Aristotle have their own unique arguments dedicated to the topic in front of you and a way to explain what virtue is. It seems easy to define virtues, but it may be very difficult to truly understand the arguments behind the definition. - Definition of Philosophy Personal or moral philosophy is about how people should live or how to act. People who claim that the philosophy of our life is "lifetime", "at horn", or some cliches are often heard. Though the definitions are correct, these people use the phrase "philosophy", but the words closely related to our past, present and future great thinkers are different. When talking about ancient Greek, the first ideas were Plato and Aristotle. These two names are the most important philosophers in the history of philosophy. Plato and Aristotle have almost always to say. Ethics, politics, science, science, mathematics, geometry etc. are all interested in this topic. Plato is a philosopher and mathematician of ancient Greece, born at Stadix in Athens City in 424 BC, died in 348 BC. At the same time, Plato is also a student of Socrates. Plato founded the academy, the first higher education institution in Western Europe, in Athens.

Between 1847 and 1947 the scope of Indian independence was mainly the result of Indian nationalism growth. The decision to make India independent is not a result of a major revolution that forces England to leave India, even a logical climax of policy mistakes, it is a voluntary decision. Patrick Francis said: "The British people left India as they lost control of the major areas of the government, lacking intent to restore control and financial or military power." Even before India was independent, the Indian National Assembly clearly stated its position on foreign policy. In the words of Indian foreign policyist and Indian National Assembly theorist Rejaul Karim Laskar, he says: "After the establishment of the Diet in India, we began to clarify that view on diplomacy, at the first meeting of 1885 Congress resolved problems such as poverty, lack of medical care, social repression, prejudice of concerns of British officials As the Indian citizens have never been talked about or worried about their overall existence, the concept of an institution like Congress is an elitist and then educated It is an agency of HNWI. Founded by A.O. on 28th December 1885. Until India acquired independence on August 15, 1947, the retired British military officers rested. The Indian National Congress is considered to be the central and definitive influence of India's largest and most famous public institution, as well as India's independence movement over the long term. . The official Alan Octavian Hume of the retired British Indian Civil Service (ICS) has been invited to the Indian National Congress (Indian political party (British Indian India Free India)). After the Indian rebellion in 1857, the rule of India was transferred from the East India Company to the British Empire. British governance known as British Large, or simply Large India is trying to support and demonstrate Indian governance with the help of British educated Indians who prefer a more familiar and familiar British culture . Political thought

Is there a satisfactory way to adjust omnipotence and loving God and the presence of evil of nature? (Ie not evil caused by human free will) abuse. One of the core assertions of the Jewish Christian tradition is the existence of Almighty and Almighty God. To oppose this is to observe that people and animals suffer evil. From common sense, we can deduce from this observation that there is no god imagined from this tradition. If he exists, he will cease from evil. The problem of evil in philosophy What is the classic "evil problem" ("three difficulties") in the Western philosophy / theological tradition? The problem of evil is how to harmonize the existence of evil with omnipotence, omniscience, and the presence of the Almighty God. Greek philosopher Epicuras detailed this trilemma in ancient times and summarized it in modern David Hume. Epicuras advocates a trilemma to counter the concept of almighty The problem of evil has two branches. Evil logic problem (LPOE) seeks to prove that the existence of evil contradicts the existence of omnipotence and omnipotent existence. The evidence evidence question (EPOE) tries to prove that the existence of an amount or kind of evil contradicts the existence of somewhat effective and benevolent entity. Of course, not all Gods are considered omnipotent, omnipotent, or either. Many gods are morally defective, positive evil, or simply indifferent, and not omnipotent. The evil logical matter does not apply to these gods, but evidence of evil evidence still holds true. This is consistent with the idea of ​​evil. That is, there are defective evil, irrelevant, or totipotent entities compatible with reality and the existence of omnipotent and omnipotent entities is not. The problem of evil can be formulated in various ways. Indeed, the 'problem' pointing to evil may be more accurate. Recipes are interpreted as logical problems. Regarding the logic of evil, it is claimed that these two arguments, (1) that Almighty and Almighty God exists, and (2) the existence of evil is logically incompatible. Since evil exists on the surface, it is claimed that God (usually understood to be omnipotent and omnipotent) does not exist. In the latter part of the 20th century, logical arguments became dominant. But by the end of the century religious philosophers generally believed that the logic was rebutted. One of the reasons is that there must be hidden or unspecified assumptions as claims (1) and (2) are not clearly contradictory. But what is that?

The category of Aristotle's things is called "ambiguous" and they have common names, but the definition corresponding to the name is different. Therefore, the actual male and the person in the picture can be called "animals", but they have common names, but because the definition corresponding to the name is different, they are all arbitrary names . His definition in the case applies only to that situation, in the sense that everyone should define each animal as an animal. Aristotle's classification is a very important philosophical study. Not only is it the pillar of Aristotle's own philosophical theory, it has unparalleled influence on the systems of many great philosophers in the Western tradition. A series of doctrines in this category, which I call classificationism, provides a framework of Aristotle's various philosophical studies, from Aristotle's physics to time theory to metaphysics and even discussions from expansion. He refused Platonic moral philosophy in his ethics at Nikoma. Beyond his own work, Aristotle's taxonomy brought something like primitive man, porphyry, Aquinas, Descartes, Spinoza, Leibniz, Rock, Berkeley, Hume, Kant, Higg. The attention of various philosophers such as Brentano and Heidegger differently accepts, defends, modifies and rejects their central debate. It seems strange to quote Aquinas in articles about Aristotle's category, but I do it for two reasons. First, as Ackrill and Furth commented, Aristotle's plan was severely criticized by scholars and philosophers. But Aquinas' comments on quality shows that a truly talented translator - indeed Aristotle's interpreter is not as big as Aquinas - can satisfy many criticisms. Secondly, and more importantly, Aquinas' attention to quality category suggests its deep historical importance in one of the most important facts of the Aristotle category, ie metaphysical speculative development . In this respect, it can be compared with metaphysical 20th century quantifiers. It is difficult to imagine the analytical metaphysics of the 20th century, regardless of whether the quantifier has the final philosophical significance.

Hume uses three speakers to introduce various ways of reasoning. Cleanthes, Philo, Demea are three speakers of Hume's dialogue on natural religion and they are available to readers as a unique and contrasting method of reasoning and knowledge. Some Cleanthes contrasted his "detailed philosophical approach" and "causal skepticism of Philo" and "strict orthodoxy of Demea". Demea first explained his personal approach to knowledge through his example of how to train and educate his child. For a variety of reasons, this approach is questionable, which explains why scientific philosophers tend to remove the term "causality" from the discussion of determinism. Generally, as John America (1986) ridiculed, this method is "ambiguous conceptual determinism, trying to explain true causal relationship". In particular, "More specifically, neither philosophers nor laymen have the concept of events.The same can be said about the correlation cause in modern physics theory and the concept of adequate cause.In Bertrand Russell in 1912 By opposing the notion of reasoning in these ways (and other aspects), the situation has not changed. By trying to define causality decisions based on a series of earlier adequate conditions, we inevitably Fall into the confusion of the open negative condition list necessary to achieve the desired satisfaction. Well I will let you answer Rebecca's first objection; there is no reason (deterministic obvious obedience reason) that our actions are meaningless. It is necessary to distinguish between appropriate and inappropriate conditions. A good condition is that the reason is forcing people to act in a specific way - that can not be different. There are reasons for inadequate conditions, but they are not overwhelming - people can choose different ways. According to William Hasker's words, "If you think you are willing to sell my old car to me, I will accept it. Your offer is the condition that I accept it The perfect reason is that because it does not require my consent, this behavior still makes sense as we choose to develop it based on the facts provided.

I am expected to change my presence forever and build a stronger, stronger, more popular ship with the first class liner that departed on Wednesday 10th April 1912. I have been waiting for this for a long time, but since I got the chance of this life, I will not let it go. I came out of the dock; I blew a relaxing, heavy black burning from a sparkling, smooth, long, wonderful funnel. I am standing on the maiden 's voyage, I can not wait. When first asked about the Titanic, what did you first think? Of course, one thing that many people did not think was a musician who came down on a boat. I admit that I do not know much about musicians, except that the host of the band is called Wallace Hartley, as I am a Titanic lover. In a sense, it is interesting to read this niece Yvonne Hume which is a violinist John Hume (usually playing John Flum at the Titanic Monument). When he resigned from the Titanic, he was only 21 years old, left a sad family, a fiancee, and a child who was not born yet. This is a book full of information, but for any Titanic enthusiast, Titanic does not have "new" here. John is from Scotland 's Dumfries, but his illegal daughter later abandoned all relations with Scotland. Illustrations and photographs on Dumfries, and a lot of pictures of John and other family members. The Titanic had existed 100 years ago, but only 15 years have passed since the Titanic of James Cameron. I am a freshman, and the Titanic is one of the three movies offering the nude scene of the year (with its strength and very high expectations - beautiful roses only wear gems; She is enthusiasticly sketched Out of her eyebrows, the eyebrows are satisfying.It is not a coincidence that it was the year I shot for a nude painting art student.It is not so, Never, I think that it is "one of them." According to my experience, "one of them" means "pretend to be absorbed in TV football" And, "I will tell men that you are infecting yeast." They laugh at what I do not think is interesting. First, I planned to write a brief history of American health insurance. However, when doing some research, I included Titanic documentary. To be honest, in the movie is the Titanic. In any case, the similarities between these seemingly completely different situations are wonderful and can not be missed. So I combined it with historical time series comparing the title of the Titanic with the history of American health insurance. The Titanic departed in 1912, when the concept of health insurance first appeared in the United States at the time. However, the idea came from an amazing source of information. The hospital of the day was not regarded as a high-level life-saving facility today, but it was regarded as "a place where you are likely to die." Antibiotics, vaccinations, electrocardiograms, etc, made significant medical progress in the 1920s, but most of the beds are empty every night.

Some believe that Clifford 's opinion is contradictory, but it attracts devaluation of possible outcomes of non - political beliefs and argues that the result is not related to this belief. My argument is that Clifford's view is the same and it is only necessary to clarify the impact on the role of "belief ethics" (and in this respect William James's "will believe"). As Clifford argues, the outcome of certain events not formed by a specific belief has nothing to do with the state of knowledge and moral belief. A moral problem is the use of non-political beliefs to form a policy that constitutes a commitment to the principle of opposition. (I) our earlier moral obligation to minimize the risk of harming ourselves and other people (ii) blatant ignorance (i) adoption of risk policy, ie non-political . Clifford's claim should be interpreted as proof that the non-political belief management approach actually constitutes a risk contradictory to the moral obligations of this predecessor. They have nothing to do with this risk. The moral status of their beliefs. They have nothing to do with non-political moral status, but they have nothing to do with the facts of risk. Non-political moral imperfection is in a contradiction with our previous moral obligation, not the value or depreciation expenses of a particular outcome of the belief management style. Naturally, the classical trajectory of belief debate ethics is an article naming it. "Ethics of Faith" was published in 1877 by a mathematician of Cambridge and a philosopher William Goldden Clifford in a journal called "Contemporary Review". At the beginning of the paper, Clifford defended the strict principle that we are always obliged to provide sufficient evidence for each belief. Indeed, since the early part of "belief ethics" was very strict, William James later described Clifford as "delicious greed" and defended "self-discipline." Tragedy "(1896, 8) In 1877, William King Don Clifford suggested that belief in certain things would be unreasonable without sufficient evidence in his book "Ethics and Beliefs". . He often acknowledges that there is a gap of understanding between evidence and conclusion in the belief of many people (inductive reasoning), but he also said, "Whenever there is no evidence anywhere, nobody knows things In addition, he insists that trusting (tendency to believe) and tolerating superstition eventually harm society. He agreed with David Hume (1711-76) and "All wise men are commensurate with their beliefs and evidence." This position - a belief without sufficient evidence - is irrational - is called evidenceism and many atheists (including Clifford and Hume) are adopted in their theology. In "Ethics of Faith", William Clifford believes that no one can believe without evidence anytime, anywhere. Clifford gives immorality without evidence. An example of faith is the owner of a ship who believes that his ship is on the sea, abandoning the overhaul of the ship, overcoming his doubt, spending the examination and making the necessary repairs. This example is a belief in self-interest. For his own interests, the owner of the ship overcame his doubts. Then he gathered his insurance and everyone on his boat died in the ocean as he proved that the ship was not ship resistant.

I will also be used to gather information on military and related wallpaper. Today, I found the file folder that contains these pictures so I want to share the video with you and share it EMI (Pakistan) Company will automatically protect copyrights of songs and incomes of shared YouTube with them. (If you have) The topic of social media is Buri's tarah jurr GAYE's Hein K AB DIN KA farigh hissa ISI jin sargarmiyon's fried soba guzaartay hein, door rehnay walay rishton qareeb aur qareeb rehnay walay rishton Say said door hotay JAA rahay says Hein. Mobile AUR laptop yakisoba masroof nazar aaye ga apnay ai k g har yakisoba SAB mojood TOU hongay par HAR carp apnay. Maan's baap shop behan Baha'i Ki tabiyat poochain poochain Pearnham tells Koi's nahin insan ziada mohabbat karnay WALA gay jaisay aayein qabal bannay walay Facebook friends Ki tabiyat k baaray fried aisay fikarmand nazar There is not haftay. Ham is HO AUR amlan zindagi yakisoba sifar hongay n ziada muhib electronic watan AUR mazhabi insan car says aisay BEHS kartay nazar aayein gay jaisay par Samaji media fee siyaasi aul mazhabi mouzuaat Imaan, ittehad, tanzeem hmare Pakistan KI Bunyad Urdu essay. ADL - O - INSAF KA pekar, JIS men hamare HAR Amar KA badla milta sea, duniya male BHI AUR akhirat male BHI. muslaman nahi WO nahi chalte kiunke AJ KI muslaman nose SiRF Muslim PE yaqeen karti hyper Magar ham phir BHI DEEN,. AJ muslamanon par ghair musalmanon KI riwayat, unka 's taur talika is KE SAB kuch jante hue BHI darja' s ASAR Anders HO chuka Sea is a mouthpiece of SE Mun morrte Hine. WA, TA, SIMU bihablillahi jamiyan WALA tafarraqusura H Alimran "KO mazbuti SE thaam LO AUR tafraqe mat also" AUR SAB Milkerweill Allah's Ki rassi Ye taqreer date of the KER of Hazrat Ali (RA) AUR Hazrat of Zubair (RA) NE Caja KE fume Bari nidamt high KE ham meshwara khilafat milliamps of AP KE Sat nahi halanke ham khob jante Hein KE Hazrat Abu Baker (RA) Hello tamam logo ma ma khilafat k e sab se ha qdar hein kyunke aap rasso al (SAW) k e y a g rar hain. hume aap k e sharf w a buzargi ka ILM high AUR y BHI jante's Hein's KE Rasol Aller (SAW) NE apni hiyat tayyaba ma ma AAP KO imamat ka hukam farmiya THA naked. Ibn Saad (1) NE Ibrahim Tameemai SE rawiyt KI Hi KE Jabra Soul Allah (SAW) Ka wisal is Hova TU's Hazrat Umer (RA) Abu Aba Vinar Jarah KE PAS tashreef Lee Gaye Aur Ain SE Kaha KE AAP KO Rasol Aller ) NE ameen et al AMAT KA khittab DIYA's HAI laiye's apna AAP SE Feed khilafat kerta hon.Abu Abaida (RA) NE farmiya KE A Umer (RA) MA TUM KO Bar fateen AUR hoshmand samjhta THA AAJ TUM AIS qader susat レ イ ヤ ヒ HO berhaaye MA GAYE HO KE mujh SE bait kerte HO halanke TUM ma mi sadik (RA) sani asnain jaise azeem hasti majood high

Randall Jackson Jeral Randall in Nashville, Tennessee on May 6, 1914 Death of a turret gunner born at Jackson Jaral. He is the first child of Campbell and Owen Jarrell. He studied at Hume Focker High School in Nashville and then graduated. He then went to Vanderbilt University through his generous generosity of his uncle Howell Campbell. His teacher, John Crowe Ransam, thought he was "the best young artist in his studio." Jarrett continued to teach at some of the most famous universities and universities. "The death of The Gunners" by Randall Jarrell is a poem about the storm of war and even useless things in life. Turret gunners are one of the most dangerous tasks for airborne crews. When pushed into the Plexiglas dome, the gunner had only a small maneuvering space. Most men choose the position of the fetus to compensate for the extreme weather that must bear with a narrow place. "I fell down in the country as a result of my mother's sleep. / I turned over until my wet fur froze" (1-2). The first line seems to indicate that he was involved in this dilemma when he was born, he is just another number. You must eventually give up on the "uterus" from the aircraft fuselage or your own mother; from that moment you may soon face death. However, Jarrell may send another message. Jarrell tries to lead the fears and mysteries of thousands of young fighters Randall Jarrell's "The Death of The Gunners" tells us the waste of life and a ruthless war. The turret gunner is probably the most dangerous job among the crew. When entering the ball turret, the gunner has very little space to move and it is very narrow. In this narrow space, the gunman faced a very cold temperature and had to push it into the position of the fetus: "I felt a state from my mother's sleep. -2" In most cases, Especially in this poem, when the turret and gunner leave the "womb" of the Air Force, he will fall from the torso and face death. When tying this to real birth, Jarrell may say that people born in this world eventually have to face death, and some people will be faster than others. Jarrell also gives us a deeper understanding of the cruelty of war. "Death of Turret Gunman" is a very simple poem about becoming a turret gunner. I understand that those who do not know how the artillery gunner relates to my poetry understanding when I first read or that the meaning of this poem is completely different from my view or author's view I can do it. understood. In order to understand this poem, you need to know some background knowledge. Jarrell is not a pilot, but he is familiar with B 17 and the turret underneath the aircraft. The ball turret is a plexiglass ball hanging from the bottom of the plane with the gun inside. The ball turret can be launched by rotating it in most directions. "In the flight, a person crouched in the turret for a few hours, when he fought, he moved the turret and continued shooting" (Morris)

Plato Seminar and Greek lyrics Male lesbianism by poets: Freedom or contradiction. The image of male gay men who is missing and gays' relationship is full of Athens culture. From drama to poetry and kettle, justice system, these relationships are graphically expressed in words. However, all of these images are aligned with each other, or there are conflicting differences between them. In order to see this problem we will take up two small cultures of philosophical thesis, Plato seminar, Theognis and Anacreon's lyrics. Plato's seminar D. H. Lawrence's novel "A woman in love" presents a complex model of women - male-male-male relationship. The model of Lawrence is highly dependent on the similar model proposed at Plato Workshop. The difference between the two works is how to implement it. In other words, it is a way to achieve a "perfect" relationship with any gender. Lawrence is focusing on physical outcomes. This is characterized by the repetitive word of "getting a blood oath", but Plato, Plato Seminar and Greek Lyrics Male Lesbians by Poet: Freedom or Contradiction? The image of male gay men who is missing and gays' relationship is full of Athens culture. From drama to poetry and kettle, justice system, these relationships are graphically expressed in words. But are all of these images aligned with each other or are there any incompatible differences between them? To see this question, we adopt two small cultures, philosophy. BC BC 469 BC - 399 BC is a classical Greek Athenian philosopher. As one of the founder of the Western philosophy, he is mainly the writings of his student Plato and Xenophon, and his modern drama and Aristophanes in particular, through the story of a later classic writer, famous . Many people say Plato's dialogue is the most comprehensive dialogue that Socrates has survived since ancient times. Plato's great work is also known as a seminar and is exploring the essence of love. It was written around 375 BC and reveals the importance of the feast to the classical Greek culture. Like Zenophon's earlier work, Plato is a dinner for the famous Athenian poet. Aristodemus sometimes thinks that he is invited by his guest Socrates, akletos - wonderful, thought to be a hard Aristodemus, people think any guest can think and this is a good suggestion One of the guests After Plato, the dialogue became the genre of ancient major literature, and wrote important works in Latin and Greek. Shortly after Plato, Xenophon wrote his seminar. Besides, Aristotle is said that Plato wrote several philosophical styles of dialogue (only fragments of which survive). I borrowed from the most famous Lucian collection and prepared two famous French writers, Fontnell (1683) and Fenuron (1712) ("Dialogue Death") dialogue de morts. Meanwhile, in 1688, the French philosopher Nicolas de Mar Blanche, thus contributed to the revival of this type of philosophy, and published his metaphysical and religious dialogue. Non-drama literature In the UK, dialogue was wide, and Berkeley was not used until 1713 to use it, because in his paper "Three dialogues between Hilas and Philonous". His contemporary, Scottish philosopher David Hume wrote a dialogue on natural religion.

The resistance of Whitley depends on the knowledge that white people soak into her heart. She understands now that white people use God's word as an excuse for enslaving their race and depriving them of the rights of God. This is also the reason to fight for freedom. In his article "New Classical Culture and Slavery Ethnic and Social Rights in Society in Whitley Era", Erik Wright explained most of her poetry by Phyllis Whitley. Mr. Slarrow cites the views of Scotts philosopher David Hume. "A black man as part of a conversation with a learner. John Whitley's black servant Felipe Whitley, poet of Philis Wheatley Peters (1753 - 1784) from 1773 in Boston, John New England, said, "Various themes, religion, moral poetry Since then, the first book published by African-American writer Phyllis Wheatley remains one of the most controversial in African-American literature, but one of the most famous people Whitley's In life life scientists, abolitionists and even the future US president Thomas Jefferson are discussing her achievement.In the centuries later scholars said that her poem influences African-Americans' liberty struggle It is related to the wider political and ethnic issues that I have raised, but the centuries of African-American writers are also concerned with Whitley's African It does not contribute to the creation and development of literary tradition of American-American. In the first three years of American independence in 1773, the poet Philith Whitley (1753-84) published her book "A Collection of Various Themes, Religion and Moral Poetry". Whitley was not only the first African American who published the book, it was also the first person gaining international reputation as a writer. Whitley was born in Senegal, arrested at the age of seven, and sold as a slave. She was taken to Massachusetts State and owned by a Boston businessman. By the time she was sixteen she had learned new English. Her poetry has been praised by many of the key figures of the American Revolutionary War, including George Washington, and he is grateful that he wrote a poem written for him. Some Caucasians feel that it is difficult for them to believe that a black woman can write such an exquisite poem. Whitley needed to defend himself in the courtroom to prove that he wrote his work. Some critics believe that Successful Defense of Whitley is the first recognition of African-American literature. Phillis Wheatley (1753-1784) is the first African-American who published the book and is the first African-American who gained international recognition as a writer. Like her predecessor, Lucy Terry (1724-1821) - the poem "The Battle of the Bar" is the earliest known literary work of African-Americans - Whitley was born in Africa and became a slave in America It was sold. But they can write poetry. She uses English. Based on the evolution of the European thought known as the Enlightenment the educated Caucasian elite assumes that it can not possess the best form of civilization including the expression of civilization, so both Terry and Whitley It is abnormal. Whitley published September 1773 "Poetry on Various Themes, Religions, Morals".

In this article we will discuss why Utilitarians oppose Peter Singer's argument in "famine, prosperity, and morality". After reading such an interesting paper, I can not agree with the viewpoint of the singer, but I felt it hard to use assistance to oppose them. From the utilitarian point of view, we want to maximize happiness by reducing pain. How can I make someone unhappy? But, as I was thinking about the proverb, "step back two steps." The center of famine, wealth, morality is an article of the same name in 1972 of Peter Singer, which is a standard in the field of applied ethics. This is one of the rare works of philosophers who offer a lot of complexity and can tackle with the majority of the general public. Please read this article again and reconfirm my interest in applied ethics. Then you may ignite or reignition you. The first article was a response to a very special situation, but as I mentioned elsewhere in this book the epidemic of extreme poverty today is equally important. If we do not do our utmost to alleviate hunger, poverty and disease in many situations, especially where there are solutions, in order to simplify (perhaps excessively) it would be better to live a sufficient moral life Can you do it? If we are not at home, should we do it for the rest of the world? In his article "Famine, Prosperity, and Moral", Peter Singer made seemingly devastating criticism of our general thinking about famine relief, charity, and morality. There are few people accepting or acting in any way, but his conclusion still exists. Based on these facts, as Hume said, singer 's argument can be said to be Berkeley' s argument about non - materialism, "they admit that there is no faith without answers "Singer's consideration It shows that people should do more than most people do and they do not determine his conclusion with full power or universality. Hence, his argument acknowledges a few answers, and once qualified, there may be some belief. In "famine, prosperity, and morality", Peter Singer emphasizes the corrective meaning that it can accept utilitarianism as a guide to action. Millions of people earn less than $ 1 a day

Ralph Waldo Emerson: In the early 1800s, one thought America had a sense of new literary freedom. Past colonial writers were deeply influenced by their European roots and the limitations of technology did not diversify the printed literature any longer. By the end of the 1700's, however, the American population exploded, printed words became more accessible, and newly discovered freedom in the UK created a perfect new intellectual communication environment. The writer David Hume, Henry David Thoreau, George Putnam, Frederick Henry Hedge, etc. are centered around exploring the national identity and nonconformity of many Americans. Ralph Waldo Emerson I am writing this article on beliefs and thoughts about Ralph Waldo Emerson's personality, society, government, technology, and spirituality. Emerson thinks that everyone should be with as many people as possible with as many people as possible. Whoever you are, please do not try to imagine others. If someone is a real friend, they will like you, do not worry about adapting. I will let you down with your faith. Possibility of our soul and our imagination. Henry David Thoreau tests the idea of ​​Ralph Waldo Emerson's nature by living in Walden, where he said that the simplicity of the body deepens our minds and our souls become their greatest possibilities I will discover that it will reach. Imagination is being raised to change our lives. These two people believe that nature forces them not to rely on others' ideas. Transcendence and Ralph Waldo Emerson transcendence are literary exercises that began in the early 1800s and continued until the Civil War. Ralph Waldo Emerson is a man who has an interesting and influential view of life and the universe. Emerson, along with the other great people, helped shape the essence and achievement of transcendence. Without these people, transcendence would not have anything. Two work by Ralph Waldo Emerson and Henry David Thoreau, their transcendent beliefs are similar, but they express dealing with social problems. It is the opposite voice that my faith greatly differs. - Slave Movement. Although their focus is more on subjects of ethics and personal choice, they still contemplate how Americans should deal with slavery, and Americans make a decision to freed whites I will mention. Ralphwald Ralph Waldo Emerson Ralph Waldo Emerson was born May 25, 1803 in Boston, Massachusetts. In the early days of his life, Emerson traced his father's footsteps and became a pastor, but at the end of 1832 he felt he could no longer serve as a pastor of conscience. He doubts the Christian church and his teachings

Whether absolute justice exists. This article presents a discussion about the existence of absolute justice. Many people do not agree with the existence of absolute justice. Therefore, because they have contradictions and different forms of justice, we believe that justice can not be derived from nature and can not get bigger and more perfect from smaller and more incomplete ones. This is why the concept of culture and the concept of time justice differ greatly from culture to culture. The vision of perfect justice comes from Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau, Kant's tradition of enlightenment. They insist on insight into completeness, ideal or absolute justice, based on the theory of social contract. Through contractual means they introduce perfect justice, leave it natural, govern the country according to the law, favor mutual benefits and both sides, and build an ideal society. For Hobbes, Justice is in the hands of the monarch, while Rock Justice exists in the form of individual rights on life, freedom and property. For Rousseau, the individual's general will or social moral collective will in society will form institutional rules that can bring about justice. However, Hume refused to recognize social contract theory because it had no historical evidence of any original contract or other contract. His explanation of justice is based on customs and customs. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Shailesh_Trivedi2/publication/323239845_International_Conference_On_Role_of_Arts_Culture_Humanities_Religion_Education_Ethics_Philosophy_Spirituality_and_Science_for_Holistic_Societal_Development/links/5a87f22ca6fdcc6b1a3b5f07/International-Conference-On-Role-of-Arts-Culture-Humanities-Religion-Education-Ethics-Philosophy-Spirituality-and- Science, society, development.pdf for the whole Does absolute justice exist? This article presents a discussion about the existence of absolute justice. Many people do not agree with the existence of absolute justice. Therefore, because they have contradictions and different forms of justice, we believe that justice can not be derived from nature and can not get bigger and more perfect from smaller and more incomplete ones. This is why the concept of culture and the concept of time justice are very different. This is another case for absolute justice. Their argument allows absolute justice from nature. There is no problem, of course there is a justice system. However, natural justice, more precisely the jungle law is another word of justice, which is consistent with a more powerful profit. This is clearly incomplete justice, as justice and justification are not always strong. Or justice may help a friend and hurt the enemy. Like a group of animals that can not be killed by themselves. Therefore, we see many different forms of justice in nature. Of course, justice can not have different definitions. For example, if there is just for the benefit of a person with a strong justice, it can not help a friend and harm an enemy. (For example, if a friend is an enemy, one acts for the enemy and the other means for your own death, but acts for their own interests.) Justice

Just-in-time project Time management information system Management as project management directory 1 Introduction 4 What is 2-hour management? 5 Why is management important for 3 hours? 6 4 What is the challenge of management for hours? 10 5 Summary 12 6 References: 13 Table 3 1 Typical project results 8 Figure 3 2 Results of project after milestone determination 9 1 Introduction Do all project managers know "three constraints of project management" We need to understand. Factor limits: range, time and cost. Balancing the complex project elements - time, money, scope, and people - is one of the project manager's jobs. Project management training is an important step in managing unexpected failures that the project manager may encounter everyday. In order to help you better understand the problem, the following outlines the top ten project management challenges the project manager may encounter in the workplace. Undefined goal - If the goal is not clearly defined, the entire project and the whole team will be affected. If management can not agree or support undefined goals, there is little chance that related projects will succeed. In order to set and communicate clear goals, the project manager needs to ask appropriate questions from the beginning. Introduction Project management What is project management? Project management is the core of the construction process. It is a field for organizing, planning, and managing resources to ensure that the goals and objectives of a specific project are met correctly. Understanding modern management skills and understanding the building and design processes is key to superior project management. - Causality is a process that occurs as a result of certain human behavior in our daily life. When you say this, it is very easy to describe it to get a definition; causality is an action that leads to something (Oxford Dictionaries 2014). David Hume, a famous philosopher with a causal relationship theme, may seem to be united in these two events, but said he can not know the nature of this relationship (T. Honderich 2001) . The definition of project success usually involves completing the project on schedule. To develop and manage the project schedule to complete the project as planned is the main responsibility of the project manager and realistic planning and effective program management are necessary to complete the project on time. For small projects, the project manager can lead the development of the project plan and develop plans to fulfill the plan. For larger, more complex projects, emphasis is placed on cost, schedule, and administrative functions that the project management team can use to plan the project management team and track the progress of the plan.

Difference between primary quality and secondary quality. Locke thinks the main difference between the two simple ideas we got from emotion. Some of the ideas we received were similar to those of the world, but others were not. The idea similar to its cause is the concept of primary quality, ie hardness, extensibility, image, movement, and quantity. What is not similar to the cause is the idea of ​​secondary quality of color, sound, taste, texture, and smell. The country of Lockerbie has a real world that transcends our understanding. John Rock is one of Great Britain's great philosophers and is widely regarded as a leader in the field of epistemology, metaphysics and political philosophy. He also made an important contribution to education, theology, medicine, physics, economics, political science. Locke's empiricistic epistemology (he is the founder of empirical knowledge theory) influenced Berkeley, Hume, and subsequent empiricism. In 1689, he announced "two political theories of government philosophy" anonymously. The first paper attacked the concept of the absolute power of the monarchy (patriarch system), the second the paper summarized Rock's views on orderly society, harmonizing civil liberties and political order. John Rock and John Stuart Mill's Freedom Definition John Rock thinks that humans should have more freedom in political society than John Stuart Mir. John Roc's "Second Paper of Government" and John Stuart Mill's "Freedom of Expression" outlines the conceptual framework of ideal nations of each thinker, but influential and powerful literature It is a work. Two different views on human nature and its freedom are proposed. About how John Locke and John Stuart Mill take different views John Rock (1632-1704) was the first person in the classic English classics. These philosophers are skeptical of rationalistic metaphysics, in particular abuse of speculation, epistemology based on congenital concepts. Explain all natural knowledge of human knowledge without reference, and his theory is simpler and better than Descartes' theory. - To live in society based on the social contract we signed, the government and artificial law is definitely a strong defender of the treaty itself. They will benefit the citizens and protect the country's safety. Nonetheless, they should not be the only reasons for justice, it should not be a precondition for justice.

Studies of ancient world slavery from Mesopotamia and the Near East to classical Greece, and (especially) Imperial Roman great slavery society, comparison of ancient and modern slavery, ancient slavery from Adam Smith Contemporary view From Marx to MI Finley, go to Hume. Reading in English During the past few decades slavery archeology, in particular archeology of the enslaved African American community, is one of the fastest growing archeology research fields in the United States. In this course, the Atlantic slavery archeology to understand the development of this archaeological subfield, from the initial focus on slavery living conditions in plantations to the interest in the subsequent integration process in Africa Examine the classical and current literature on academic research. - American race. What are the current challenges that people face by investigating the substance composition of African Diaspora over time? Unit 1 - ancient Near East. You start this course in ancient Near East. A deep story about the ancient Sumerian Gilgamesh's epic, friendship, adventure and immortal unsuccessful pursuit. Then, you read the Hebrew Bible options. It includes a story of the flood. It is very similar to the story of the Gilgamesh flood. At the end of this module there is Exam 1. In this exercise we will compare whether to compare Gilgamesh's specific letters and themes to Hebrew Bible letters and themes.

Studies of ancient world slavery from Mesopotamia and the Near East to classical Greece, and (especially) Imperial Roman great slavery society, comparison of ancient and modern slavery, ancient slavery from Adam Smith Contemporary view From Marx to MI Finley, go to Hume. Reading in English During the past few decades slavery archeology, in particular archeology of the enslaved African American community, is one of the fastest growing archeology research fields in the United States. In this course, the Atlantic slavery archeology to understand the development of this archaeological subfield, from the initial focus on slavery living conditions in plantations to the interest in the subsequent integration process in Africa Examine the classical and current literature on academic research. - American race. What are the current challenges that people face by investigating the substance composition of African Diaspora over time? Unit 1 - ancient Near East. You start this course in ancient Near East. A deep story about the ancient Sumerian Gilgamesh's epic, friendship, adventure and immortal unsuccessful pursuit. Then, you read the Hebrew Bible options. It includes a story of the flood. It is very similar to the story of the Gilgamesh flood. At the end of this module there is Exam 1. In this exercise we will compare whether to compare Gilgamesh's specific letters and themes to Hebrew Bible letters and themes.

4. As a cause or source of pain, injury, or destruction: social evil of poverty and injustice 9. The power to bring evil and harm (sometimes capital): evil is powerful in the world [Old English yfel, Germanic; Old Frisian squid, Old high German ubiquitous evil, Old Irish adbal excess] Initially the evil impulse was as fragile as spider clues but eventually it became as tough as a cart - Babylonian Talmud Evil behaviors such as crushed rotten eggs stink the nostrils of all Bartlett's American dictionary. The evil of the journey of life is like a hill warning travelers during the trip. Both look better in the distance, but it will be far more difficult to overcome than I expected to approach - Charles Caleb Colton Evil like poison has their usage, and diseases other diseases can not reach - Thomas Paine Our sin is like our shadow. - Sir John Sackling (He is a wonderful man but completely corrupt, he is shining like a dirty squid under the moonlight - John Randolph Very awful [crime] It is like a painting of atrocities and lives of martyrs of foxes - Jonathan Valin The deputy is as famous as the skunk and is caused by an unfortunate extreme - Bartlett's American Dictionary Futures repeat the way the wind wanders, dusts others' eyes and spreads themselves - William Shakespeare The philosophical world calls this irritating problem "evil problem". So, the philosophical dictionary (Penguin, 1999) says, "There is evil in the world, bad things happen to people, people do bad things." Furthermore, "There is an imbalance between virtue and happiness between sin and suffering: evil prosperity and good people should meet evil destiny, evil will happen." This question was first published in the 18th century It may be the most famous summary of philosopher David Hume. Skeptics. He says, "The old question of epiculus is still untouched, I hope to prevent evil, but I can not, then he is helpless, he is okay, he is not intentioned, then he is competent It is competent (Dialogue on Natural Religion, Part X, 1779) Because of our free freedom, I assert that we have evil in this world and do not fully answer the concept of "evil problem". To say that there is evil in this world is the same as saying a wrong decision in this world. Decisions as bad as evil have no shape. God can not do bad things because all decisions God makes are good decisions. Human beings started evil. - The problem of evil The foundation of the Jewish / Christian tradition is to believe that there is a supernatural individual, that he is the ultimate creator, and that all other existence is due to their existence. The three main features of this existence (God?) Are completely good (full strength), completely strong (full strength) and all knowledge (omniscience). Theodicy is a particular area of ​​theology and philosophy, aimed at harmonizing the existence or suffering of evil in the world by believing in God, omnipotence, and kind God. Therefore, it recognizes the existence of evil, God is both capable of eliminating good and evil, and then attempts to explain why he does not. One of the most famous expressions is the performance of Gottfried Leibniz in 1710. He is optimistically insisting that our world is the best among all possible worlds, and it must be the best and the best Because it is a god created by the perfect world, it is the balance The world that was taken

This world is influenced by great good deeds and evil deeds. These actions have extreme ranges on both sides, showed a friendly way to help your neighbors build a fence, and instead came down to the Holocaust. The parties seem to be acting according to their own wishes. Evil and kindness can also occur in ways that are not monitored at first glance, such as finding a lot of money on the ground and destroying your town with tornadoes. For some reason, the state of the world is an act of good and evil. In the worship of the church today, we are thinking "rational discussion". It is essentially an elaborate "god of the gap", the gap is no longer scientific, it is philosophical. These include "difficult" called knowledge problems, other ideological problems, and consciousness, even Hume 's "should" problems. ~ Sunni Islam's most important and influential theologian ~ Ab'Hâmid Muhammadibn Muhammad al-Ghazâlî (1058-1111) attacked counterfeiting. These are Muslim philosophers who follow Aristotle's tradition. A similar idea in Christianity eventually reached the doctrine of Thomas Aquinas (1225 - 1274). Especially, al-Ghazali wrote as follows even though it opposed the principle of scientifically necessary cause and effect relation. Just because there is the idea that science has revealed that "God is in the gap", why can not you find the "god" with the blank? Atheist Bradley agreed and he wrote, "It does not mean that all the gaps in the future will be buried just because past gaps are filled by further natural science investigation ... Science Looking at the history of it, we can see that all the scientific theories we currently support are proved wrong. If Hawking really succeeded in trying to scientifically explain the first moment of the universe's history, it correctly destroyed the "god of the gap". But the God of Christian theology is not a blank God who satisfies the current scientific ignorance, it interacts with the first moment of the history of the universe and is not a person who withdraws from a safe distance after that. Although the use of Hawking's M theory may ultimately be effective, Christian theologians will also doubt about where the M theory itself comes from while applauding. God is a law of physics, who creates and maintains scientific assumptions but does not explain

Three theories - Marxist history theory, psychoanalysis theory and personal psychology; I started The flying animals will see a way to escape and hide. . . . In general, objects change. Ignore the objections, and a serious attitude is to prepare to change them - test them. Newton physics has been successful, but he thinks it is based on induction. )When 9. Hume said "satire" instead of saying "logic." One of the reasons, in speculation and refutation, Karl Popper called time and space "There is no response to Einstein's blockade universe." Unfortunately, this does not preclude you (Ethan Siegel) and other Einstein supporters from keeping lying. The truth is that neither forward nor retreat is timely behavior. why? Just because there is no time dimension. The simple answer is that the time dimension of change is self-referencing, so the time dimension makes movement impossible. The longer answer is to assume that the temporal motion must be given by the time rate v = dt / dt, which is meaningless. That's pretty easy, is not it? In other words, objects such as spatio-temporal trajectories, geodesic lines, objects moving along lines of the world in space, time, etc. have no temporal and spatial movement. Do not stubborn relativists draw wool in your eyes in a meaningless way without explaining why there are spatiotemporal movements. Popper's Helenaise and Sir Karl Popper's interpretation of Greek in his thesis "Science Philosophy: Personal Report" states that "The theoretical scientific position standard is its counterfeitability, It is testable "Popper 23). He insists that "good" scientific theory must fulfill one requirement: its testing ability. In other words, a good theory predicts future observations and the accuracy of the prediction supports or counterargs it. - Einstein's theory of relativity is revolutionary. Everyone agrees that Einstein brought this revolution. Even though anyone claiming that Einstein just adjusted the theory of Lorentz and Poincare acknowledged that Einstein was the first to recognize the physical meaning of these formulas. In the mid-20th century, philosopher Carl Popper highlighted counterfeitability criteria to distinguish evidence from nonscience. If a sentence, assumption or theory may prove incorrect, they are counterfeitable or refutable. It is, if you can come up with observations and arguments denying them. Popper uses astrology and psychoanalysis as an example of pseudoscience, Einstein's relativity theory as an example of science. He subdivided non-science into philosophical expressions, mathematical expressions, mythical expressions, religious expressions, and metaphysical expressions on the one hand and subdivided pseudo-scientific expressions on the other hand, but gives clear criteria for differences There was not.

For more than 2000, various philosophers have questioned about the influence of art on our society. They transcend the world using abstract reasoning, human emotions, logic and find answers to the existence of art. For philosophers, art is not for its own beauty, but for the question of how art and artists can help stabilize our society for the next generation Thing. Plato, Greek philosopher who lived in 420-348 BC. In Athens, Plato's student Aristotle opposed his beliefs and the steps they took to understand the purpose of art and art were no exception. Author: Gerard · Cretian Plato and Aristotle Many modern experts believe Plato was the first true political philosophy, Aristotle is the first political scholar. They are the foundation of Socrates's great thinker and great Western philosopher. Plato and Aristotle each have ideas on how to improve their society during their existence. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze their different theories with this heavy metaphysical speculation. In conclusion, Hume wishes to limit metaphysical speculation to one field and is not so inclined to such a fate. Aristotle and Plato's excellence is a function, and what makes it a function is the definition of Plato's virtue. What does this definition mean? Both Plato and Aristotle have their own unique arguments dedicated to the topic in front of you and a way to explain what virtue is. It seems easy to define virtues, but it may be very difficult to truly understand the arguments behind the definition. - Definition of Philosophy Personal or moral philosophy is about how people should live or how to act. People who claim that the philosophy of our life is "lifetime", "at horn", or some cliches are often heard. Though the definitions are correct, these people use the phrase "philosophy", but the words closely related to our past, present and future great thinkers are different. Introduction Plato and Aristotle are two famous literary critics of ancient Greece. Aristotle is a student of Plato. They all think that art is a type of imitation. But their attitude toward imitation is quite different. Plato says that poetry is merely an imitation and has the potential to adversely affect humans, so it is worthless and bad. On the contrary, Aristotle admits that poetry is imitation, but he thinks that it is better, even better. He also explained that imitation life should be evaluated rather than discount ("Platto and Aristotle").

Kripkenstein: Rule and uncertainty summary: Basic question of theoretical understanding of uncertainty, such as Wittgenstein and Kripke's rules of uncertainty regarding language and language, uncertainty concerning Quine's fundamental translation etc. In this paper, Wittgenstein And Kripke 's uncertainties and then compares them with other related theories on human uncertainty of thought such as Hume, Quinn, Goodman. Uncertainty of theory Quine differs from Wittgenstein in several respects. Twenty years ago, Jules Coleman and Brian Wright announced important articles on legal certainty and legal objectivity 17. Their argument about legal certainty was about the certainty of the intent of the Kripkenstein rule's intent. Question, this is the question I discussed earlier. In the second half of this article, Coleman and Wright looked at the issue of legal objectivity. They distinguish between semantic objectivity (meaning of language is independent of speaker's belief) and metaphysical objectivity (world situation, irrespective of case-based belief). I would like to concentrate on this A common example of Wittgenstein's problem per Kripke - Cripplestein problem - is obtained from arithmetic. Take the two numbers you have never added, such as 241 and 77. You may think that the rules that you followed obey the answers to 318. But how can we verify that the rules to follow are not rules of instruction? You can follow the latter rule instead of generating 318 rules no matter how many times you add up to 318 until March 19, 2013, then 5, until then.

Key features of cosmological argument The cosmological argument began with Plato and since then it has been defended and attacked by many great philosophers. One of the supporters is Leibniz. Cosmological arguments are basically discussions on causation. Its main supporter is Thomas Aquinas, but Gotfried Leibniz also proposed a simplified version of Aquinas' cosmological point. The main critics of the discussion include David Hume and Bertrand Russell who question the rationale for discussion. Kalām's cosmological argument is a contemporary expression of the cosmological argument about the existence of God, named after Warrior Lane Craig in his "Calm Cosmology" by Karam (medieval Islamic academic philosophy) It was done. (TheKalāmCosmologicalArgument, 1979) promoted. This argument is a variant of Aristotle's indifferent promoter, which was named after the medieval Islamic academic philosophy and because of the possibility of Craig's opposition to the actual infinite existence Craig became a philosophy of the 11th century Go back. Home Argalari Like most arguments about the existence of God, cosmological arguments exist in many forms; here two are discussed: cosmological arguments of time, Kalam (ie the first argument), and division Discussion of style. The main difference between these two arguments is that they avoid the first opposition to the argument and cast the question "is there a reason for that existence in God?" Then suppose that God exists to explain the existence of the universe and we will not take us anywhere. Without God, we have an entity that we can not explain, there is a universe; there is an entity with God, we can not explain, that is God.

Let's say John Doe has a bulldog that he does not train well. One day, John's dog jumped over the fence and handed over to Jane Smith's dog, Fifi. Jane hurried to the vet to Fifi and sent a $ 2,000 veterinary bill. Jane sued John Doe for $ 3,000 to compensate for the veterinarian's invoice and pain. The judge agreed and ordered John to pay $ 3,000. This order is a judgment against John, usually a question of public records. If John does not decide, Jane can request relief from the court. This may involve the court leaving statutory liens on assets and subsidizing salary or other acts. There are all kinds of judgment. For example, if the defendant does not appear in the court to defend himself or does not respond to the subpoena, the default sentence is beneficial to the plaintiff. If the sale of the forfeited property does not produce enough cash to pay the judgment and the court must retain the statutory lien for more property, a flaw judgment will result. The judgment is reported to the credit institution, and usually personal credit reports are kept as negative items for seven years. However, judgment is not necessarily money. For example, a judge can command John to build a high fence above his property, or take away the dog. Note: According to Article 54 of the Federal Civil Procedure Code, the judgment includes orders and orders that are the basis for the appeal. : A petition for moving defendants' motion, the petition can be rejected in the subject judgment, the judgment judgment is canceled according to the judgment, the judgment is supported. Note: In federal judgment the judgment has been replaced by a legal judgment, but the judgment still exists. : The judgment of the defendant against one or more offenses if the defendant's petition at the end of the evidence or judgment based on the court's own pleadings and the evidence is insufficient to maintain confidence. : A judgment is given to a defendant who did not respond effectively (because the answer was withdrawn or did not respond to plaintiff's case) : A judgment that can be made on a petition of a party if there is virtually no material de facto problem in a complaint, discovery or other affidavit and the party has the right to determine its merit as a legal matter Note: According to Article 56 of the Federal Civil Procedure Code, summary judgment can be done in whole or in part. c: Convictions of criminal defendants by the court and imposed penalties 2: Judgment acts: psychological or intellectual processes that form opinions or make decisions Decisions made by individuals or organizations (as Board of Directors) authorized to act on behalf of the company (H) Maintain multiple claims or judgment for multiple parties. If the court makes a final judgment pursuant to the conditions provided for in Rule 54 (B), the court may continue to execute the judgment before submitting a subsequent judgment or judgment and determine the conditions necessary to secure the profit . A party that promotes a judgment. (A) Physical disability and unavailability after trial or hearing. If there is a judge supervising the project or proceedings of the evidence, he / she shall hear the petition and make all the decisions and judgments required by the court in connection with evidence and judicial or hearing. After a trial or hearing What is the taste judgment? Kant judges two basic requirements, subjectivity and universality in judgment (Kant 1790). Other conditions will also help to judge the taste, but they are the result or foundation of the two basic conditions. In this respect, Kant follows the guidance of other writers in the sentimental traditions of Hume and Britain (Hume 1757). The first necessary condition to judge the taste is that it is inherently subjective. This means that the taste judgment is based on emotions of joy or misfortune. This distinguishes taste judgment from empirical judgment. The central example of taste judgme

Author: Gerard · Cretian Plato and Aristotle Many modern experts believe Plato was the first true political philosophy, Aristotle was the first political scholar. They are the foundation of Socrates's great thinkers and great Western philosophers. Both Plato and Aristotle have ideas on how to improve the society they lived in. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze these different theories. In this heavy metaphysical speculation (Aristotle, Rock, Marebrass is a special case) efforts are depressed mistakes leading to ridiculous or intuitive conclusions. This fateful field. Hume tried to incorporate this difficult philosophy into the "easy and obvious" work subject service by establishing the method and the clarity of metaphysics. Let's consider Aristotle's metaphysical case briefly. Aristotle is seeking wisdom here. Part of the metaphysical argument is to clarify what kind of wisdom Aristotle is seeking. Aristotle wants to say that this wisdom is part of material science, material science, or material science (see Aris for details on this discussion). Dodd's metaphysics, especially 1 and 1). The important thing is that this science includes investigation of causality, that is, finding related reasons. The metaphysics that we know are Aristotle's "first philosophy". Metaphysics includes the study of the universal principle of existence, the abstract nature of existence. Probably the starting point for Aristotle's metaphysics is that he dismisses Plato's formal theory. In Plato's theory, the physical object itself is variable rather than real, instead it corresponds to an ideal, eternal, immutable format through a generic name that can only be perceived by intelligence. Therefore, what is considered beautiful in this world is actually an incomplete appearance of beauty shape. Aristotle's arguments against this theory are many. After all, he refused Plato's idea as a poetic but empty language; as a scientist and an experienced, he further tipped to pay attention to the reality of the material world. The term "metaphysics" seems to have been created by the editors of the 1st century CE, and he calls all the small Aristotle's works as metaphysical papers. Aristotle called it the "first philosophy" and divided it from mathematics and natural science (physics) into a meditative (theoretical) philosophy, "theology" and sacred studies. In metaphysics (1026 a 16), he wrote as follows. If there are no other independent things other than complex nature, the study of nature will be the main knowledge. It is also the first philosophy, as it is the first it is such universality. It belongs to this philosophy. That is, as being of existence, it is both an existence and belonging to it.

In addition to believing these things, Payne also chose to explain why he does not believe in traditional Christian faith. This is the reason he chose not to believe in the necessity of proof by the scientific revolution and experiment. One example is the description of the paint on doctrines and textbooks of different religions, and the reason he chose not to believe them. He answered the story of how the Qur'an was bought by humans and said that "I have no right to believe because I never saw an angel on myself" (CP 67). Rather than social reform in 1883, the use of reasons to advance knowledge through science is also known as the enlightenment of many new scientific experiments Colonial political power against God of Thomas Jayson, human and nature Harmony Elizabeth Stanton and Luklia Mott): Women are concerned about angry feminists: abolish slavery and provide new rights to many people immediate: women's rights treaty of Seneca Falls Audience: universal: who But to participate in the Seneca Falls Convention: to declare and resolve American women's rights issues in order to treat their theme equally, such as citizenship, equality, women, happiness, rights, voice, faith, and God. Teacher, country, church The role of women in society is the subject of controversy in enlightenment. The issue of gender equality is being debated under the influence of philosophers and philosophers such as John Locke, David Hume, Adam Smith, Nicholas de Conduce, Jean-Jacques Rousseau and others. Before enlightenment, women were not considered equal to men. Rousseau thinks that women are dependent on men and women should obey men. Locke recognizes extensive inequality and believes that men's ideas for women were created by men. Condorcet also challenges existing gender inequalities by defending women's political equality. The author quotes Queen Elizabeth, Russian Queen Catherine and Queen Maria Theresa as competent women.

Indian nationalism Indian nationalism is not a simple unification of Indians against colonial rule. The formation of an organization that tries to speak on behalf of people involves many complicated problems, many of which are caused by the National Assembly of India, whose leaders are composed of Hindu elites. In 1885, the National Assembly of India was founded by Allen Octavian Hume and soon became a major organization representing the will of the general public and attempted to lead the Indians to fight for freedom. The term "American Indian Education" refers to Indian Indian education. This term also refers to education designed for Indian people by colonial countries. In the past five centuries, Indian education and Indian education became a controversial point. Like all human societies, the former is promised to perpetuate family values, languages, religion, politics, economics, skills, science and technology. Indian colonial education has been dedicated to eliminate indigenous people's knowledge and values ​​and to replace values ​​and knowledge that are considered "civilized". The conflict between Indian education and Indian education means that the history of Indian education is all built in the context of power and sovereignty. Education in India has faced generations of generations, linking federal power and tribal power and federal sovereignty with tribal sovereignty. Indian education is consistent with greater political agenda. That is to establish a colony, allocate land, close the tribe, move the family to the city, or promote tribal self-determination. The history of education in India is the history Indians have tried to manage children's education in every way. For successful implementation of tribal sovereignty, regional control of education is still an important element Factors that hindered the study of Indian history finally lost their power. There are several trends to provide scholars with the motivations and tools necessary to historize India and tribal identities. These include a new way of thinking about race and ethnicity, a new way to explain and explain the history of India, and a new or more dynamic Indian occupation from a group of different people. Intellectual development motivates scholars to think about India in history. It is a fundamental change in understanding of race. Since the 1960's scientists and social scientists gathered convincing evidence that there is no biological definition in ethnic categories. Several people, the first inhabitants of the United States, develop unique genetic models through long-term isolated crossing, but humans are single species with the possibility of a common ancestor and species range. Sexual partner

One of the most fundamental problems that moral philosophy applies to our daily lives is the relationship between truth and philosophy. Before people fully understand how this relationship is understood by Platon, I understand how Plato understands truth and happiness as an independent entity, namely truth and happiness is needed. Platon never declares the truth explicitly; instead, he is closest to explaining the characteristics of truth (as he has adjusted justice before the republic). Aristotle and Plato's excellence is a function, and what makes it a function is the definition of Plato's virtue. What does this definition mean? Both Plato and Aristotle have their own unique arguments dedicated to the topic in front of you and a way to explain what virtue is. It seems easy to define virtues, but it may be very difficult to truly understand the arguments behind the definition. - Definition of Philosophy Personal or moral philosophy is about how people should live or how to act. People who claim that the philosophy of our life is "lifetime", "at horn", or some cliches are often heard. Though the definitions are correct, these people use the phrase "philosophy", but the words closely related to our past, present and future great thinkers are different. Author: Gerard · Cretian Plato and Aristotle Many modern experts believe Plato was the first true political philosophy, Aristotle is the first political scholar. They are the foundation of Socrates's great thinker and great Western philosopher. Plato and Aristotle each have ideas on how to improve their society during their existence. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze their different theories with this heavy metaphysical speculation. In conclusion, Hume wishes to limit metaphysical speculation to one field and is not so inclined to such a fate. Plato, Aristotle. Aristotle is a student of Plato. Despite being taught by Plato, they have different theories and perspectives. Their morals are classical and traditional in classical Greece, but Aristotle details the road of virtue and happiness. The political theory of Pluto's utopia society is different from Aristotle's view of "the best state of every society". Their metaphysical theory is completely contrary and very contradictory. Plato and Aristotle have come from the same age

Martha Stomas Robert Malthus is a famous economist and pastor. Born in Surrey, England on February 13, 1766, he was the sixth child of the seven children. Malthus studied at the University of Cambridge in 1784 and graduated with honors in mathematics after four years. In 1789, Malthus became a deacon of England Church and Sally's Oakwood Chapel. In 1798, he influenced the future development of society and commented on Mr.'s idea so he released his famous work "Population Principle Group". Thomas Robert Malthus Thomas Robert Malthus is one of the most controversial figures in economic history. His reputation derives primarily from the demographic theory closely related to his name. Contrary to the view of the latter half of the eighteenth century that it is possible to raise people's living standards, Malthus believes that such improvements lead to population growth and therefore to reverse these benefits. Malthus also said that (rather than thinking that the economy can experience high unemployment rates over the long term) (rather than thinking that economics should be experience, not deductive science) than theoretical theory Thomas Robert Malthus was born in February 1766 near Guildford, Surrey. His father succeeded at home and accepted Thomas' s education. Malthus then studied at the University of Cambridge and received a master's degree in 1791. In 1793 he became a researcher at Jesus University in Cambridge. In 1805, Malthus became a professor of history and political economics at the University of East India Company in Hailey Berry, Hertfordshire until his death. Malthus became a member of the Royal Society in 1819, two years later was appointed a member of the political and economic club, including David Ricardo and James Mill. In 1824, he was elected as one of the royal family members of the Royal Literature Society. Malthus also co-founded the London Statistics Association in 1834. Thomas Robert Malthus died on 23rd December 1834 Thomas Malthus, Thomas Robert Malthus, (1766 13 February, the UK Surigord near Roquery, died in 1834 December 29, St. Catherine, Bath, is best known in the summer his theory, the UK economy near the scholar and Seth is demographers, population growth tends to exceed the food supply, and without strict breeding restrictions, human improvement is not possible. this idea is often called the Malthusian. Malthus was born to a wealthy family. his father is skeptical David Hume of friends philosopher, Jean-Jacques Rousseau has been under the influence of his book Émile (1762) is about to educate the son it might be a source of liberal thought. young Malthus, until he enrolled in Cambridge, Jesus College in 1784, was educated in most of the time home. So he is the many subjects And research, was awarded the Latin and Greek awards, I graduated in 1788.

Whether capitalism is compatible with morality is a long-standing controversy. We adopt Adam Smith's ethical approach to virtue and we will examine how market competition affects the most relevant virtues of modern business society. Until to a certain extent, competition nurtures and supports virtues such as prudence, moderateism, civilization, diligence, and honesty. There are mechanisms, however, that could have a detrimental effect on the institutions and incentives required for sustaining even those most commercially desirable virtues. Generally, competitive market will be intense if competitive market is good. However, in the long run, the policy of intensifying competition ignores the fostering and support of bourgeois-like virtues and may weaken the continued prosperity of modern business society. Cautious, temperate, courteous, diligent and honest bourgeois virtues we are thinking here are "ethical business" literature (identified by Albert Hirschman and Adam Smith, David Hume and Montesquieu) is more than mere The needs of the business community chosen to acknowledge that it is compatible is encouraged. Of course, the whole system of Smith, when he understood, adapted to the needs of the business world. Therefore, lack and corruption should be concerned (as Smith lacks courage), but carefully conclude how the consequences of moral prosperity in the commercial society will affect one or all of them There is no doubt. Whether capitalism is compatible with morality is a long-standing controversy. We adopt Adam Smith's ethical approach to virtue and we will examine how market competition affects the most relevant virtues of modern business society. Until to a certain extent, competition nurtures and supports virtues such as prudence, moderateism, civilization, diligence, and honesty. There are mechanisms, however, that could have a detrimental effect on the institutions and incentives required for sustaining even those most commercially desirable virtues. Generally, competitive market will be intense if competitive market is good. However, in the long run, the policy of intensifying competition ignores the fostering and support of bourgeois-like virtues and may weaken the continued prosperity of modern business society. Our analysis sets the direction of future research. First of all, in our article, we develop a Smith framework to analyze the relationship between competition and virtue, and each virtue of bourgeois, highlighted in this article, and other virtues that Smith believes - justice and kindness - We need to analyze further in detail. An ethically successful business community is important. For a wide range of social scientific literature, this micro level analysis will be more systematic than this thesis. Such an analysis also allows us to further explain how specific institutional arrangements related to market competition affect different virtues.

Elvis was born on January 8, 1935 in Gladys and Vernon Presley, a farmer's family in the state of Mississippi. Elvis Aron Presley was originally twins, but his brother Jesse died after birth (Austin 1994). An intimate family, Elvis and his family joined the god meeting of the church, and love for his music began to bloom (EPE 2014). His family grew with a lot of economic difficulties. Still, at the age of 11 Elvis received his first instrument, the guitar. Shortly thereafter, Vernon Presley tried to find a job in Mississippi. The decline of Elvis' era error occurred five years later during the gorgeous gorgeous disco hot heat, but the dead idol life and career interest is still very intense. As the most versatile artist of the 20th century, Elvis Presley is an unusual variety that links its generosity and lyrics away from as far as possible imitators. Presley 's sheriff: Our incredible story of Elvis' s missing year was that Rex Mansfield was elected the army on the same day as his first place in the "I had already" list, and Secretary of State Elizabeth Stefanac has released the singer 's two years. Witnesses of life rarely visit life Friday from 2 pm to 6 pm. George Klein rotated, interviewed and talked about all Elvis Presley, CST "Elvis Time" of Sirius XM satellite radio, Memphis legends. This encyclopedia rock and roll supplier has been broadcasting for 64 years and witnessed the dawn of his favorite music type. Since the eighth grade, two friends were 13 years old when I met, but this friendship lasted 29 years, until Presley was badly for prescription drug abuse. To explain their endless connection, Klein witnessed Presley playing "cold, cold, cool fingers" with a broken acoustic guitar at a talented show at Hume High School. On August 26th, Elvis had to stop laughing during the soprano obligate of West Houston (Whitney's mother) (And are you lonely tonight?) At the show at noon. This performance became Elvis fans' underground legend until the Elvis Aron Presley 8 LP box was officially released in 1980. In September 1969 Elvis Presley 's 30th work "The girls' troubles" was released at the theaters, and there were not many offices in the box. RCA of the American Sound Studio conference released "Suspicious Minds". This became Elvis' s first single since "Good Luck Charm" in 1962, becoming his last popular single. There are lots of big hit songs

She treated him indefinitely, but he did not adversely affect his temper and personality. (Philipson, 2010: 12) Smith 's great road is his mother, his work, and his political view. She died in 1784 and became 90 years old. Smith told his publisher Williams Trang: "People who died at the age of 9 at her age are undoubtedly the most appropriate event for the natural process.It is foreseeable, therefore I Others who have to say what they have say that the last farewell from the one who loved me once loved me or loved me more than anyone else. Adam Smith is Scottish moral philosopher and pioneer of political economy. Adams Miss is known for his classic works such as "moral feelings theory" and "the theory of the wealth of the people". Adam Smith, known as the father of contemporary economics, is still the most influential economic thinker. "National wealth theory" is considered Adam Smith, the most popular classic of the first modern work of economics, economics. Adam Smith was born in Kilkadi in Fife, Scotland and is the son of Margaret Douglas and Adam Smith. Adam Smith studied Latin, mathematics, history, and sentences from 1729 to 1737. Adam Smith later entered Glasgow University at the age of 14, where he deepened his enthusiasm for freedom of cause, freedom and speech. In 1740, Adam Smith entered the Barry Hall University of Oxford until 1746 Adam Smith's contribution to management Adam Smith (1723-1790) is a Scottish political economist. His "theory of wealth of citizens" was published in 1776, founded the "classical school" and became the father of "free economics" in his publication. Smith believes that markets and competition should be regulators of economic activity and that tariff policies are destructive. Labor specialization is the backbone of the Smith market system. Mr. Smith thinks that division of labor provides the administrator with the best opportunity to improve productivity. A paper on Charles Babbage Adams Miss and Robert Owen's contribution in the field of management About Charles Babbage Adam Smith and Robert Owen's contribution to management Adam Smith FRSA (June 16, 1723 - July 17, 1790) is a Scottish economist, philosopher and writer, and a moral philosopher, a pioneer of political economics, Scotland Illuminati important It was a person. Smith is known for his two classic works "theory of moral sentiment" (1759) and "quest for the nature and cause of the people's wealth" (1776). The latter is often abbreviated as "wealth of the country", his masterpiece and is considered to be the first contemporary economics work. Smith studied social philosophy at the University of Glasgow and the University of Oxford Balliol. He was one of the first students who benefited from the scholarship founded by his brother John Snell of Scotland. After graduation he held a series of successful open lectures at Edinburgh, which allowed him to work with David Hume during the Scottish enlightenment. Smith received a professor in Glasgow, taught moral philosophy, and during that time wrote "Moral emotion theory" and published it.

The problem of evil is how the omnipotent, omnipotent, full force god can exist when evil seems to exist. The problem of evil gives way to the idea that if it exists, God must be evil in order to send someone there. I believe that neither concept believes that God can exist in the presence of evil and that God is not evil. I believe that hell exists because God is holy and justice. The bigger thing is that anyone can go to heaven. I will try to answer bad questions about heaven and hell. The problem of evil in philosophy What is the classic "evil problem" ("three difficulties") in the Western philosophy / theological tradition? The problem of evil is how to harmonize the existence of evil with omnipotence, omniscience, and the presence of the Almighty God. Greek philosopher Epicuras detailed this trilemma in ancient times and summarized it in modern David Hume. Epicuras advocates a trilemma to counter the concept of almighty The problem of evil has two branches. Evil logic problem (LPOE) seeks to prove that the existence of evil contradicts the existence of omnipotence and omnipotent existence. The evidence evidence question (EPOE) tries to prove that the existence of an amount or kind of evil contradicts the existence of somewhat effective and benevolent entity. Of course, not all Gods are considered omnipotent, omnipotent, or either. Many gods are morally defective, positive evil, or simply indifferent, and not omnipotent. The evil logical matter does not apply to these gods, but evidence of evil evidence still holds true. This is consistent with the idea of ​​evil. That is, there are defective evil, irrelevant, or totipotent entities that are compatible with reality and the existence of omnipotent and omnipotent entities is not The problem of evil can be formulated in various ways. Indeed, the 'problem' pointing to evil may be more accurate. Recipes are interpreted as logical problems. Regarding the logic of evil, it is claimed that these two arguments, (1) that Almighty and Almighty God exists, and (2) the existence of evil is logically incompatible. Since evil exists on the surface, it is claimed that God (usually understood to be omnipotent and omnipotent) does not exist. In the latter part of the 20th century, logical arguments became dominant. But by the end of the century religious philosophers generally believed that the logic was rebutted. One of the reasons is that there must be hidden or unspecified assumptions as claims (1) and (2) are not clearly contradictory. But what is that?

In the mid 1940's, "from the French ethics" (14c), and "from the Latin ethics" "good or bad" (good or bad), "someone's appropriate behavior in society" literally "etiquette It is related to ". Translation cause from Latin Moss (gender Morris) to "Personality", plural form, "custom, custom, moral" of "Greek" (ethics reference) from Cicero ("De Fato", "II.i) It is unknown. Maybe share English emotion and PIE's roots (1) It means "moral good according to moral rules", initially recorded at the end of 14c. Stories, people of the 1630s. Neutral consciousness to original value is held in moral support, moral victory ("sense compared to personality versus physical behavior"). Related: Morality It is worth noting that moral relativism, moral skepticism and moral expertise are logically independent of each other. For example, moral relativists are also moral genericists but not moral skeptics (such as cultural relativists like the ale sociologist William Graham Sumner of the early 20th century); moral skeptics are He is not a moral expert. (For Nietzsche, McKee and Richard Joyce they are providing "erroneous theories" to build so-called absolute universal objective moral principles); some of the special supporters Moral questionable commentator (eg his view of contemporary new Aristotle like Ross, "practical responsibility" or "proper job", Jonathan Dancy), not ethical, moral realism, Reasonable human condition 4, Kant ethics and human existence: moral philosophy research - Section 1.2, EKE and moral relativism, moral skepticism and moral specialism Moral skepticism (or moral skepticism) is a sort of meta-alien theory that all members believe that no member has moral knowledge. Many moral skeptics also propose claims of stronger aspects than moral knowledge is impossible. Moral skepticism is contrary to the existence of moral realism, especially the identifiable and objective moral truth. Michael Ruth, Joshua Green, Richard Garner, Richard Garner, Walter Sinotto Armstrong (1977), Max Stillner, Friedrich Nietzsche, Richard Joyce (2001), Pierlin, Inceidemos, Dexter Dempse, David Hume, JL Mackie (Some moral skeptical views of including defense, 2006b) and psychologist James Flynn. Strictly speaking, Gilbert Harman (1975) believes in supporting moral relativism rather than moral skepticism. However, he influenced several modern moral skeptics

Author did not present persuasive litigation that school uniforms and clothing provisions violated student speech freedom and impaired important values. She insists that the student is the only student with clothing regulations. She said that students should be able to express themselves at their own discretion. She thinks that uniforms will not help maintain respect for the school community. School uniforms are essential for students to learn discipline and respect. According to the author's opinion, "I think that they should apply to everyone. If the purpose of speech and policy is to maximize market freedom of ideas - I am very convinced that it should be - it must recognize these inhomogeneities as it is not. "Zero adjustment point" does not mean to maximize freedom of speech, but for those who speak relatively less, this is the focus of maximizing freedom of speech. As I saw earlier, this is not the place we live today. Free choice While social freedom refers to two actors and their actions, freedom of choice represents the relationship between an actor and a series of alternative potential behaviors. "A has free choice of x or z" means that A is more likely to perform x or z, or that both x and z are open. Conversely, if A is either impossible or unnecessary, A has no freedom to choose x. In this sense, Hume defines freedom as "ability to act according to decision of decision or power not to act". The freedom of choice is neither a necessary condition of social freedom nor a sufficient condition. If A can not do x, he will only do this if his incompetence is caused by some other actor B. Otherwise, even if he does not have the freedom of choice for x, A can free x. Let's return to the average Americans and clarify the relationship between the freedom of choice and the dilemma. He has a poor "freedom of choice". But let's see his choice. He can buy various medical plans - but they do not cover much, and they are all deadly. He can apply for a million jobs - but none of them can provide him with a reasonable retirement level, leisure, trust, income, stability, opportunity, and maneuverability . He can choose hundreds from thousands of cable channels - but they are not close to pornography about fat man, ancient aliens, conspiracy theory, expert experts TV shows and BBC Documentary etc etc. He has the choice - this is true. But his choice adds to the dilemma because they are all bad: a decision between two or more wrong choices

Human understanding In the history of human understanding, I can not think of a person who can learn from a single point of view of philosophy. To compare and contrast their ideas, I am very pleased that there are two philosophers in this class. The subject of human understanding is the various ideas to be discussed, but these ideas can be very complicated. Two philosophers, René Descartes and David Hume, took up the task of discussing human understanding and making them conditions that allow people to better understand. The responsibility of human understanding is to understand what something can not understand and what they are. In addition to understanding, if you need to care about understanding at the same time, you only need to make public opinion. On the other hand, understanding, contemplation is also a gift from God. What should people do and what they do not use it? A person uses it in fear and trembling rather than for his own interests but if it uses it in fear and tremor to fulfill the truth it is still in the eternal meaning of God Believe in him if you believe it is a matter of decision, and obey it unconditionally. This is not a fear of God, but to serve God in a different way, but more enthusiastically, in a reflexive manner than spontaneous people. "For me as a historian, religion is an indispensable feature for human experience, human society, and human lifestyle.In my opinion, understanding religion is essential for understanding human beings Religion is almost everything - history has played a major role - American Revolutionary War, Civil War, Black Slavery, Abolitionism, all of these things. "I am an atheist who is a religious person. I live in their world, but I am not part of that. I live in the world Puritan believed that God reserved this fallen beautiful world. I live in a world where Joseph Smith can find gold plates and angels to visit you. I live in a world where a man rises from the death and miracles appear. This is a world of fun filled life, but if you do not believe it, it is also the world of aliens. Many scholars today believe that human nature has spontaneous goodness. They do not know what human nature is. They do not understand - how can you solve your problem if you do not understand? Joseph Conrad knows that we need to change our minds. But he does not know how to change. Conrad said "The fundamental change in the mind is a strange belief that it should follow after the decline of a certain human system.These people think that it is only a name change that they can produce I can not understand. "In other words, the surface appearance can be changed, but the core value will not be changed. We do not change it because we do not understand it - so human suffering continues

In ancient times, there were countries full of strength and strength. As the country, like other military buildup of military forces, the economy seems to be eternal, and as strong as to establish the government on behalf of those people. This seems to be a country setting examples for all countries. This is a prosperous bigger. This is a great Roman Empire. The rules of this country never seem to end, but this is far from the truth. A huge prosperity resulted in a bad straight drop and eventually it collapsed. Like wheat, if two things happen the same way, they tend to fall the same way. So in my opinion, the reason is the decline of Rome like the United States like a rise in economic, social and political aspects, similar to the rise of Rome, the decline of the United States - the reason in terms of ideology in Rome and the USA In the order of most profound similarity,. Of course, this is not a coincidence: establishing fathers, their admirers and students, America hopes to shine in the Potomac River and become a new Rome. Thereafter, the new Rome will not be destined to the same old Roman way till the end - if there is a suitable model to emulate Rome: but I guess they are trying to solve the problem Is not there? Ancient Rome encountered political paralysis like modern America. In Rome, most voters are not a problem. Although it was the emperor of the Roman Empire who entered this political disparity, although it brought domestic stability, it only accelerated the collapse of Rome. For this country political paralysis of a great American patriot may be a melancholy moment, while Scott Crow watches a great opportunity to do great things. "In this country, we have not explored a series of paths along the way," Raven said. "The dominant paradigm tells us that there are cultural, economic, other alternative political life, no choice, we are voters and consumers - this country of more complex social relations" Historians have been fascinated by the decline of great civilizations like ancient Greece and Rome. But for human beings, no more important lessons, rather than the collapse of the United States which has finished the era of virtue invisible in the dark age, and not including autumn than the whole planet. Ultimately even before the birth of the country was released, it destroys the powers of the United States of philosophy. This proposition can also be understood and the sun will not rise tomorrow, "Make sure that it does not become more contradictory Meaning: His philosophical skepticism of David Hume 1748" Investigate human understanding, "I wrote it rises. So we need to waste to prove that falsehood. 1781 ", so I know that it denies knowledge to make room for the necessary faith," he writes the criticism of pure reason Immanuel Kant "he founded, the founding of the United States 5 Published later years

Kant's knowledge theory and the theory of freedom theory began to establish the theory of human understanding in criticism for pure reasons. His approach is to integrate the opposite view of empiricism and rationalism. After Locke and Hume he adopted the principle of experience [1], the basis of our philosophy, that "all our knowledge starts with experience". However, contrary to them, he also includes a reasonable view that there is a tool of human understanding that is in front of experience and is essential for us to have experience. In the 18th century, German philosopher Immanuel Kant developed a knowledge theory in which knowledge about the universe could be a priori or synthetic. According to Kant, knowledge on the universe is synthetic. Because the statement on the universe is not merely the meaning of the word in the statement. In his work Kant refuses the idea that space must be material or relational. Instead, he concluded that human beings do not consider space and time to be objective features of the world, but we have imposed it as part of the framework of organizational experience. One of the most important outcomes of Kant's empirical theory is that the world we are experiencing meets the requirements of empirical possibilities so that it is possible to master the knowledge of the world. Therefore, Kant thinks that the object can only be known if the object can be given in the experience. This aspect of the subject's epistemological state requires several important research areas, and although we wish for knowledge it is not the case. Most importantly, Kant believes that the philosophical exploration of 'super know' things which is not part of the metaphysical transcendental, experience world shows the deadline of philosophy. (Note: There is a subtle, but important difference between Kant's "transcendence" and "transcendence" terms. "A priori" explains the conditions of empirical possibilities. Modern knowledge theory was introduced with his "critic system" by famous philosopher Emmanuel Kant. Some authors believe that knowledge is part of the philosophy of the term epistemology, but now it has evolved into independent science. Education of knowledge, organization of libraries, and many other very practical implementations. For me, knowledge theory is the most useful subject at school as it provides me the basis for solving any problems, questions and challenges in my daily life. The way we study and think about knowledge is a tool in our hands.

Descartes argues that "Cogito ergo sum" deviates largely from the philosophy of his era. Beginning with the basic principles of rationalism, he concluded that "I, therefore, I think it exists." In his meditation II, Descartes reached the zero point of epistemology. Here, Descartes started his amazing view. "So it was reflected very well, and we examined everything carefully, when will we finally propose psychological understanding?" In this statement he said that his own After confirming the existence, he came to the conclusion that he was his own - thoughtful thing, that is, heart, understanding or rationality - It is abstract. When Descartes used consciousness to define thinking, Descartes provided one of the first purely psychological uses of the concept of consciousness. However, he did not analyze this concept. Instead, he uses this concept to prove his cognitive assertion in meditation. However, his way of using this concept means analysis. Conscious thinking is a state of mind that is voluntarily imposed in some way. According to Descartes, all ideas have this basic attribute. Thinking - Thinking is the main attribute of thought. Descartes' definition of thought is very extensive. It includes all spiritual manipulations such as imagination, perception, reasoning, belief, hope, doubt, desire, motivation and so on. There is controversy about the criterion of thought. Many philosophers believe that Descartes believes consciousness is a sign of thinking. Others believe that Descartes defines thinking as a representative one. However, others believe that Descartes believes that the idea is determined by the combination of these two standards. Naturally, Descartes has a different meaning from "Hume". In the context of denying that it is an animal, Descartes seems to think that the word represents the present idea, that is, entertainment, thought idea, or a sudden idea (Malcolm 1973). Of course, ordinary adults express their thoughts through declarative remarks; declarative speech shares some important features with the current idea. For example, both have a propositional content, neither of which is irrelevant to the stimulus (that is, thinking can happen to a person and produce declarative speech completely unrelated to what happens in human direct environmental perception) Neither is dependent on behavior (that is, the idea may happen to humans and may generate declarative remarks that are not related to current behavior or needs).

There is a problem of evil. This is a simple and direct fact. Discussion on the evil (and pain) problem proves this fact. The argument over evil shows that God has full power and full power. It shows that God is kind. In other words, he is hoping that only kindness exists. But look at all evil and evil in the world. The god of all good is completely inconsistent. God's almighty is that you can do whatever he wants. So, if God can do anything what he wishes, why can not he do all the good things and things? The problem of evil in philosophy What is the classic "evil problem" ("three difficulties") in the Western philosophy / theological tradition? The problem of evil is how to harmonize the existence of evil with omnipotence, omniscience, and the presence of the Almighty God. Greek philosopher Epicuras detailed this trilemma in ancient times and summarized it in modern David Hume. Epicuras advocates a trilemma to counter the concept of almighty The problem of evil has two branches. Evil logic problem (LPOE) seeks to prove that the existence of evil contradicts the existence of omnipotence and omnipotent existence. The evidence evidence question (EPOE) tries to prove that the existence of an amount or kind of evil contradicts the existence of somewhat effective and benevolent entity. Of course, not all Gods are considered omnipotent, omnipotent, or either. Many gods are morally defective, positive evil, simply indifferent, and not omnipotent. The evil logical matter does not apply to these gods, but evidence of evil evidence still holds true. This is consistent with the idea of ​​evil. That is, there are defective evil, irrelevant, or totipotent entities compatible with reality and the existence of omnipotent and omnipotent entities is not. The problem of evil can be formulated in various ways. Indeed, the 'problem' pointing to evil may be more accurate. Recipes are interpreted as logical problems. Regarding the logic of evil, it is claimed that these two arguments, (1) that Almighty and Almighty God exists, and (2) the existence of evil is logically incompatible. Since evil exists on the surface, it is claimed that God (usually understood to be omnipotent and omnipotent) does not exist. In the latter part of the 20th century, logical arguments became dominant. But by the end of the century religious philosophers generally believed that the logic was rebutted. One of the reasons is that there must be hidden or unspecified assumptions as claims (1) and (2) are not clearly contradictory. But what is that?

Selection of articles (1) When selecting a social structure, it is necessary to decide people's rights, social conditions or sovereignty. Locke and Marx showed similar views when gaining public consent. People wish for freedom without being pressured by their boss, so everyone will be a problem in their society. In terms of rock, it is a monarch and a nobleman of the world, for Marx it is bourgeoisie. The difference between Locke and Marx is that the conclusion about the essence of humanity and the desire to agree with the public is different. What is human rights? Human rights are moral philosophies or norms that clarify specific human behavior standards and are often limited to legal rights in national law and international law. Human rights are all right to everyone regardless of our nationality, color, sex, place of residence, nationality or ethnicity, religion, language or other identity. We have the right to understand human rights without discrimination. These rights are interrelated and interdependent One of the oldest human rights philosophies in the West is that they are products of natural law and arise from different philosophical or religious reasons. Other theories suggest that human rights systematize human social products developed by ethical behavior, biological and social evolutionary processes (related to Hume). Human rights is also described as a sociological model of rule enactment (sociological theory of law and Weber 's work, etc). These methods include the concept that society individuals accept rules from legitimate authorities in exchange for security and economic advantages (such as Rolls). The two theories that dominate the controversy over contemporary human rights are interest theory and will theory. In another position, we are trying to classify rights as basic types, not assertions of specific rights characteristics or derivatives The theory of universal human rights is certainly mainly based on Western philosophy and its value for individuals. The philosophy of Greece, the products of thinkers of enlightenment and enlightenment, and the universal approach to human rights is to use nature, God or reason, to determine the fundamental rights inherent in each individual being an existing society I argue that I can. Jacques Donnelly best summarized the doctrine of modern universal methods by presenting the following conclusion:

The paradigm's argument that religious experience as proof of the existence of God is the nature of "descendants" is hence inductive. This means that the discussion uses data and evidence to draw conclusions. Discussion of experience must include a feeling of encounter, so experience of encounter is seen, felt, perceived, and therefore makes our experience exist (Hume). It seems normal that these experiences seem to exist widely throughout society. Discussion of religious experience is an argument from the experience of God to the existence of God. This argument asserts in a powerful way that only experiences of existence are possible and that phenomena of religious experience can prove the existence of God. Because people experience God, they must possess God; the case is closed. In a weaker form, this argument only claims that religious experience constitutes evidence of the existence of God. Richard Swinburn defends this form of argument and proposes credibility principles The obvious fact about the existence of God is that some people claim to have experienced God. It is these religious experiences being used by philosophers to discuss the existence of God. - The following documents provide the rationale for the existence of God. By proving that the world of atheists can not explain the prerequisites of the laws of logic, atheists can not even explain reasonable arguments about the existence of God. "Opposed impossibility" is the only best proof that the requisite truth of the existence of God, that God's revelation to us allows us to use logic. This can be transformed into the following form using only the required truth. L: (logic law) G: (God exists) If L requires GL = G rule of reasoning " A) The argument of cosmology is to prove the existence of God. In this type of discussion, I am looking for reasons rather than design. This is based on experience, so this discussion is a posteriori argument. Thomas Aquinas divides important ideas into three methods. The first way is exercise / change. You can not move or change yourself. This must be a god, as the first move must be touched by others. "Our senses are definite and obvious, there are things in the world that are moving, now it is impossible for any movement to move by another movement, therefore one should move and move If it is just moved, it must be moved by another thing, but he can not continue to be infinite, I understand that it is God. "

Enlightenment was in the 18th century, bringing a new philosophical approach and a new way of thinking. An important idea of ​​Enlightenment is to adopt the old ideals, to see how to improve them and to change them. Those proven or discovered must be experimentally or virtually derived for some reason. There were many famous thinkers at the Illuminati. One of them was Adam Smith. Adam Smith, with the father of political economics who thought about the concept of capitalism, including the invisible hand theory that he said that companies can move freely, the concept of self interest and the concept of free laissez-raism It is considered Adam Smith was a moral philosopher and political economist in Scotland, he belonged to one of the outstanding thinkers intellectual movement of Scotland enlightenment, was born in 1723. Smith visited European Continents (France and Switzerland) from 1764 to 1766 as a leader of the public duty of Buccleuch. During this journey, Smith was able to meet a French influential thinker and gather information on various economic history and economics in Europe. In particular, he met the leader of Francois Kennethne of the Great Peasant Party, which was admired by Smith. Jean Jacques Rousseau, Can Tho MAS HOBBES, Baron de Montesquieu, François Mary Arouet VOLTAIRE, Dennis Diderot, Adam Smith and John Rock. They are major thinkers of enlightenment, they have changed views of many people around the world, as they have different views on government, people, religion. Everyone publishes documents, articles, or books about beliefs. I believe that people can be born and we should get nature from birth. Everyone has the right to freedom, wealth and life. If the government truncates one of our natural rights, we have the right to make a revolution. Wrote: Two statements about citizen government. It denies the absolute monarchy, the best government is limited power and said that it is accepted by all citizens. I believe that people form government to protect their own rights It is tied to capitalism. While propagating the theory of freedom, John Rock, David Hume and Adam Smith and other English and Scottish enlightenment thinkers in democracy and market economy. Diadora McKalkowski (2006; 2010) - This important link recently focused on her monument to evaluate their victory by re-evaluating capitalist rhetoric 4-volume history, and bourgeois identity I pointed out that I came to apply. However, in this chapter McCloskey suggests that skilfully linked areas, rhetoric and economics were added by mythical history. Indeed, the story of freedom, freedom, citizenship that takes account of political participation related to the market economy is a common myth of rhetoric and capitalism.

In the past, the focus of the Communist Party was mainly to review the freedom of speech in China. However, in recent years, when the speech strongly opposed the party boundary, the Chinese authoritarian government tried to review the speech in liberal democracy. NPR is examining China's global influence. As everyone knows, the Chinese government attacks freedom of speech at home, but it also does not pay attention to the boundaries of the Communist Party of sensitive topics to examine the people of Western democracy I am trying. As NPR Frank Langfitt reports in London, this is part of a big strategy that will change the way the world speaks about China. Frank Lanfitt, BYLINE: In June, Tibetan players participated in a FIFA football game based on the World Cup. These teams come from a collection of ethnic minorities, isolated regions, and future countries, including Tibet. However, some Western corporate sponsors do not want Tibetans to participate in the competition. Paul Watson is a commercial director of CONIFA and is responsible for the competition. Exiled Chinese author Liang Qichao introduced democracy to democracy with almost one hand. In 1895, he took part in the protest in Beijing and invited the Chinese to participate more in the government. This is the first such protest in Chinese modern history. After the government cracked the protesters and fled to Japan, he translated and commented on the works of Hobbes, Rousseau, Locke, Hume, Bentham and more Western political philosophers. He is trying to explain why China was a powerful empire and has now published a paper in a series of journals that easily find the audience among Chinese intellectuals who are about to be misled by foreign forces . In explaining Western democracy through prisms of strong Confucian background, Liang formed a democratic idea that will be used in the next century. "After reading this, my first thought was". Who made this? "Is the Chinese government trying to show democracy as a bad / incomplete idea, or are parents of Europe and the United States saying" Yes, you now need democracy! " . "...... This is a surprisingly sincere and intimate documentary, it is very beautiful (no editing). As you can in most elections you want a victory for the excellent people, in real world politics It is completed by the more brutal Dodge candidate's political plan that is commonly seen (Billy Corgan, 2007, Australia).

Expressionism and opposition to realism - Kant, Davidson and Roti (1) Abstract: The concept of expressionism and anti-expression is introduced in the discussion of contemporary philosophy of Richard Drotti to explain him and the new pragmatism I was wrong. Attitudes towards traditional epistemological problems Roti means that the history of philosophy indicates that there is no final answer to traditional knowledge, truth, and representation; therefore, they are rejected It should be. Richard Rorty argued that contemporary analytical philosophy in a philosophical and natural mirror inadvertently imitates scientific methods. In addition, he condemns traditional epistemological viewpoint of expressionism and its corresponding theory, which depends on knowledge and independence of observer phenomena and passivity of natural phenomena and consciousness. As a supporter of anti-fundamentalism and anti-essentialism in the framework of pragmatism, he responded to postmodernism of traditionalism and relativism, but he responded to most postmodern ideas and his social liberalism I opposed the commitment. This 144 page book has a title that may lead people to introductory, but while summarizing McIntyre 's theme, the author also considers other philosophers such as Donald Davidson, especially Richard Roti Use. In order to understand McIntyre's idea, readers unfamiliar with Davidson and Rorty may find it difficult to understand this material. These essays are very broad, including a paper on the concept of justice in MacIntyre, an explanation of his liberalism, his interpretation of Aquinas, and criticism of his Enlightenment. The last chapter is written by MacIntyre himself; entitled "Partial Response to My Critics", it provides McIntyre's response to some of the criticism raised by other authors. (Motivation to interact with McKintal's critics is rare and worthy of praise) From Peirce and James to Rorty and Davidson, pragmatists have sought empiricism to purify Descartes' remains. For example, they claim that empiricism deprives the spiritual understanding Rock, Berkeley, and Hume inherited from Descartes. According to this Cartesianism, thinking is completely subjective and private that its content of "thinking" or "impression" is irrevocable, completely separated from the objective world being publicized when they express ing. . Accepting this world of mind, experientists have to face the long series of difficult questions - loneliness, skepticism, realism, idealism -.

The main contribution to the ethical understanding of intuitionism Intuitive ethical theory basically shows that we already know that it is morally right. Intuitionism considers "good" to be an undetermined concept. The basic moral truth is objective, and they are independent of any thoughts and emotions. Therefore, we should follow our basic moral instinct to choose moral principles. The principle of intuition first saw in the Bible "When there is no law of the Gentiles, we are making a legal request in nature ... Moral intuitionism was one of the main powers of British moral philosophy from the early 18th century to the 1930s. It was notorious in the 1940s, but by the end of the 20th century moral instincts began to reappear as a worthy moral theory. Although we could not regain former advantage, many philosophers such as Robert Audi, Jonathan Dansey, David Enoch, Michael Hummer, David McNaughton, Las Shefland and others are pleased. Labels of intuitionists Moral intuitionism and moral nonnaturalism believe that there is an objective and irreducible moral attribute (such as the attribute of "good") and we sometimes have intuitive moral attributes or moral I have the truth. According to moral theory, human beings also have a moral sense to perceive moral principles or moral facts as well as physical emotions, as human beings have a physical consciousness perceiving the physical world. Important supporters of ethical intuition and moral semantic theory in the 18th century were the third of Shaftesbury, Francis Hutchinson and David Hume. 20th century: Preliminary proof of the responsibility theory of Principia Ethica and W. D. Ross (1877-1971) of G. E. Moore is the main representative of non-naturalism. At the end of the 20th century, James Q. Wilson's "Sense of Morality" (1993) reviewed this view. There are many versions of moral objectivism, including morals of various religions, platonic nature, intellectualism, cantism, utilitarianism, and some form of moral egoism and contractionism. Please note that since Platoists define moral objectivism more narrowly, it needs to have intrinsic value. Therefore, they refuse to accept that a contractor or egotist could be a moral objectiveist. Therefore, objectiveism emphasizes the origin of the reference frame. Thus, even though the framework is mistakenly combined with the reality used for the measurement, any reference frame is ultimately a transitive attribute of ethical subjectiveism form.

How do you judge what is right and what is wrong? Personally, I feel that we know from ourselves that we do the wrong things when we do the right things. This does not prevent someone from doing something bad, but in themselves they think they know they are doing something wrong. I believe that someone knows that they will hurt their feelings or hurt someone. Therefore, I do not constitute culture, it contributes to the determination of good and evil. In this report, moral relativism is defined and will discuss the relationship with its right and wrong and the corruption discussed in the previous issue. Hume's explanation on how to clarify the roles of roles clarifies the role play role. When Hume 's "clever audience" decides to be right and wrong, she insists on some "stable universal" views and "relaxes" from her own real feelings and interests I will. People who are pleasant in deliberation and introspective activities, those whose self-esteem is based on this enjoyment, are likely to take a wise observer's perspective and make subtle corrections. You may need to relax from your own perspective and certain passion. Human self-esteem is based on pleasure of deliberation, has a wider imagination that adapts to a wider range of complexity and requires a proper review from a stable general viewpoint. In most cases, we are a tragedy designer. I misunderstood that it is right and wrong. We ran the wrong danger, and we do not listen to our conscience. We judged that there is no correct cognitive understanding of what is right or wrong. We tend to mix psychology and religion but everything has changed and we make our judgment sneaky You may agree that correctness or error is not an identifiable objective feature of the act or decision that identifies whether it is correct or incorrect. Whether it is right or wrong is not only dependent on the custom of those days. It is not the same as saying to judge whether it is objectively correct or correct. It is possible that these actions and decisions are correct or wrong. Individuals (or indeed) agree with anyone. I can not even prove the truth or falsehood. And the concept of permit or deny is given to God or any other supreme act. I think that I am right or wrong Extremely strong emotions and intuitions to make moral decisions are not legal.

Aristotle's principle Piedia summary: Aristotle argues that Pydia can judge the method used by a given speaker without judging the conclusion (I.1 De Partibus Animalium). He believes that this "principle of principle" requires three things: to see that these principles are not mutual sources; seeing that they have nothing before reason . In order to acquire these principles, it is necessary to individually recognize the differences in the themes studied in different fields, treat the first principle as experience from experience, and obtain it from your own experience. Further discussion of this principle and Aristotle's argument about it belongs to his metaphysical treatment (Aristotle: see Metaphysics). (1) These arguments reflect Aristotle's view of logic over any article other than the logical description itself; (2) In logical writing, the principle that is not contradictory is Aristotle. One of my favorite illustrations of Dodd of "koinai archai" which is the foundation of lawyer's art. The metaphysics that we know are Aristotle's "first philosophy". Metaphysics includes the study of the universal principle of existence and its abstract nature. Probably the starting point for Aristotle's metaphysics is that he dismisses Plato's formal theory. In Plato's theory, the physical objects themselves are variable rather than actual, instead they correspond to an ideal, eternal, invariant form through a common name that can only be perceived by intelligence I will. Therefore, what is considered beautiful in this world is actually an incomplete appearance of the shape of beauty. Aristotle's arguments against this theory are many. After all, he refused to regard Plato's point of view as a poetic but empty language, and as a scientist and an experientist he strongly wanted to pay attention to the reality of the material world. A brief summary of Aristotle's first principle helps prepare for discussion of later development. As its principle implies, Aristotle has summarized an analysis of the overall affinity assertion format just like almost everyone who wrote similar reasoning. In section 2.2, the horizontal relationship is driving the reasoning. The higher the overall similarity between the two domains, the stronger the similarity. Despite the negative phrase Hume proposed the same point in his dialogue on natural religion:

This content is available through online browsing (free) program dependent on page scan. Screen readers can not currently scan, so please contact JSTOR user support for access. We will provide PDF copy of your screen reader Moral egoism is a philosophical belief that it is moral to act according to your own interests. This is a normative belief as this explains what things should be. Philosopher and writer Ian Land says that the fundamental grounds of moral egoism is that moral value is the highest because personal life is very valuable and should not be used as a sacrifice for someone else thinking about. • Medieval Western visual arts * are almost entirely religious in their theme, theme, image, and symbolism (ie Christian). The purpose of that definition is to respect the story of Jesus, Mary, disciples, and saints. Art Christ, featuring a medieval baby, often describes him as a miniature adult, even a baby, to show that his wisdom far exceeds his age. Certain evidentiary is the dominant belief ethics in early modern philosophers and modern philosophers. As mentioned earlier, the central principle is that people should rely on human beliefs to determine relevant evidence (ie evidence related to the truth of a proposition). Many evidenceists (Rock, Hume, Clifford etc.) add the condition that the amount of evidence possessed by an individual must be proportional to the degree of belief of that person. "The contained evidence is strong enough that if that is true that belief is regarded as knowledge." Because the actions claiming propositions are direct voluntary, some traditional beliefs ethics may be converted into assertive ethics. For example, if there is not enough evidence, an unreliable ban can be reinterpreted as an injunction, and if there is not enough evidence it can not be claimed. Even though we can not help you to believe the consistent consent we believe, we should refuse to argue or take action unless there is enough and sufficient reason to support it.

Partial Abstraction of Thomas Malthus Malthus 'Population Principle Group' is often quoted by Darwinian, which influences the concept of Darwin's natural selection theory. His work is unpopular and often proven to be outdated, but it actually postpones many of the socio-economic issues still being discussed: the impact of population management, food production and excessive effects . Uncontrollable illness - worry population. In this article, Malthus is said to have been proved wrong. "... Malthus's terrible prophecies proved to be wrong" (Efficiency and Fairness 211). Thomas Robert Malthus was born in February 1766 near Guildford, Surrey. His father succeeded at home and accepted Thomas' s education. Malthus then studied at the University of Cambridge and received a master's degree in 1791. In 1793 he became a researcher at Jesus University in Cambridge. In 1805, Malthus became a professor of history and political economics at the University of East India Company in Hailey Berry, Hertfordshire until his death. In 1819 Malthus became a member of the Royal Society and in 2 years was appointed a member of a political economic club including David Ricardo and James Mill. In 1824, he was elected as one of the royal family members of the Royal Literature Society. Malthus also co-founded the London Statistics Association in 1834. Thomas Robert Malthus died on 23rd December 1834 Thomas Malthus, Thomas Robert Malthus, died on 29th February 18, 1834, Roquery near Surigord, UK, February 13, 1766, St. Catherine, Bath, Summer, best known for his theory, British economy In the vicinity of Seth, a scholar and a demographic society, population growth tends to exceed food supply, and human refinement is impossible without severe reproductive limitation This idea is often called Malthusism. His father was a philosopher and a skeptical friend of David Hume and was influenced by Jean-Jacques Rousseau. His book Émile (1762) is about something about educating his son It may be the source of liberal thought.The young Malthus received education at home most of the time until he entered Jesus College in Cambridge in 1784. So he studied many subjects , He won the Latin and Greek awards, I graduated in 1788.

Antony Flew: God's Presence and Belief Antony Flew first talked to the audience about the story of two explorers accidentally encountered the jungle garden. There are many beautiful flowers and weeds in this garden. The explorer said, "Several gardeners must be interested in this plan." The opponent objected to "no gardener". So the two explorers tried to find out who is right and what is wrong. They waited all night, but I had never seen a gardener. Then, "believer" said that there must be a gardener who is "an invisible gardener." Kant believes that moral argument is effective, but the last few centuries of philosophy saw a powerful question about the existence of God which is the theory of Immanuel Kant, David Hume and Anthonyfulle. The house made. As Alvin Plantinga states, the answer by this writer is whether faith is "the right foundation" or the evidence-based position is taken like Richard Swinburne. Some experts believe that only some discussion about the existence of God is persuasive, but believe that faith requires risk rather than product of reason. They say that there is no danger if the argument about the existence of God is as strong as the law of logic, they say that Pascal 's position is "reason why in mind". Philosophical theory believes that God exists (or must exist) and is independent of the teachings and revelations of a particular religion. Some philosophical experts convinced the existence of God through philosophical controversy others believed that they had religious beliefs that they could not need or be supported by rational arguments. Theological non-cognitiveism considers religious languages, in particular words like "god" (the capital), cognitively meaningless. It is cited as evidence that there is no such thing as "god", hence it is the basis of atheism. There are two main arguments: Kenilsson uses semantic verifiable theory to conclude that religious languages ​​are meaningless as it proves weak atheism because it can not be proved

The problem raised by epistemologists in the middle of the epidemic is what is a factor that streamlines beliefs. In other words, it is possible to have a series of basically reasonable beliefs that can reasonably define all other beliefs. Or there may not be a basic belief, countless beliefs can explain the previous beliefs. These beliefs are based on more than evidence. Epistemology tries to answer these questions. Faith develops from the many propositions we open everyday. "Certain evidences are the dominant beliefs ethics in both modern and modern philosophers.The central principle is that people's beliefs based on relevant evidence (ie evidence related to the reliability of propositions) "Many evidentists (eg Rock, Hume, Clifford) have to proportionate to the belief of that person to increase the amount of evidence possessed by a person, You should firmly believe the evidence of evidence. ("Sufficient" evidence is strong enough.) If that is true, faith is regarded as knowledge. " Convenient labels that capture both broad pragmatism and extensive cant theory, practical evidence, practical / soundness and ethics are the two main categories of "real" values. See Pace 2010 for evidence and Reisner 2017 for discussion on practical reasons of faith. ) Conservatism (also called dogmatism, but generally the latter is considered to be a perceptual belief perspective, see Pryor 2000, White 2006), people believe that p actually believes p We insist (Harman 1986, Owens 2000). Another version of it considers p to be valid if p seems to be faithful to p (Huemer 2007a), or at least perceptually when p is considered faithful (Pryor 2000) . 22 Indeed, there is no clear opinion on Jim's position in 'will of faith'. See Aikin 2014 for the idea of ​​accusing James as actual non-proof (and criticizing it with the name of the evidence). For a paper showing introduction by Jame of modern epistemological problems (contextism, conservatism, virtue recognition theory), please see Hudway 2011. According to Rysiew (2015: 189), Reid's view is that the fact that cognitive principles play a central role in our cognitive life is equivalent to cognitive arguments. Practical considerations are not "completely out of epistemological considerations". Their epistemological rationale is that they allow us to act as recognition agents. They are like "fixed points" that our recognition depends on (EIP, 6, 4, p. 454)

Diana Wynne Jones's Hexwood is a young adult novel with some amazingly complex themes and plots. The influence you must consider in the genre of Harry Potter is undeniable, there are still some interesting twists and turns and some very imaginative themes. Combining gentle science fiction and fantasy, Jones creates a solid YA story with deeper, darker elements One of the reasons I was superior to Hexwood was that I was fully convinced from the beginning, and trust paid for it. In addition, Hexwood thinks that Hexwood is a wonderful myth and fantasy book (because, of course, many of Diana Wynne Jones' books are like this, because there are quite a few types of metaphors in the toy) . King Arthur's mention nodded to the mythical feelings of Beowulf, a fascinating virgin forest, and all things. Obviously, DWJ is very interesting to write this article. Whether this makes it impossible for an ordinary reader to access that book is not certain, it brings further benefits to fantasy fans. I think I know the meta language of the story, and if it makes sense, it will make everything more funny. No one knows about Hexwood Farm. The truck parked outside and did not unload anything; people wearing strange costumes came in and never came out. Ann Stavely does not know everything about Hexwood, but I know the three creatures living in this land, the wizards that had been dead for centuries, the little boys without parents, and the robots that care for them I will. She found herself by chance and visited it many times. But in her opinion, there is no way like that in the era of Huckwood. In another world, we received a letter saying that the manager of the harassed division is trapped in Hexwood from the maintenance team. A little boy called Hume encountered a robot and a dragon. Ann Stavely was lying in the bed, the virus was in a nearby house, and one disappeared to the old farmer, and no longer emerged. Ann decided to investigate when she felt better. She walked through the forest, where he encountered a tortured mage called Mordion. But Ann knew that he saw him enter the farm that morning. It seems that the correct order is not occurring. There is nothing meaningful besides this. Things continue to become unfamiliar and unfamiliar, and until the end this strangeness extends from the earth to the center of the galaxy. "

Since its founding in 1934, the Science Philosophy and its Association of Science Philosophy have worked on further research and free discussion from various perspectives of scientific philosophy. The journal includes articles, discussion articles and review reviews "Mobile Wall" represents the period between the latest issue available in JSTOR and the latest journal. The moving wall is usually expressed in terms of age. In rare cases, since the issuer selected the "zero" mobile wall, the current problem will be made public on JSTOR as soon as it is issued. For example, if the current year is 2008 and the journal has a 5 year moving frame, you can get the 2002 article. A philosophical question from Wikipedia, a free book that summarizes the issues published by philosopher Bertrand and Russell's language publisher New York, h holt and company, London, Williams, Norgate in 1912. Question (This Stanford Philosophy Encyclopedia, Internet Philosophy Encyclopedia, Discussion on this video information from the Cambridge Dictionary, there is no doubt that philosophers discussed the "induction problem" in detail, but this problem is widely believed. What is the difference, is not a solution to the problem, there will be a difference, I Classical explanation (Hume) is a "custom or habit" of persuasion. This leads to perfect allegations. Bertrand Russell discusses the inductive problem of "philosophical problems" in chapter 6 of 1912 and Hume's "history of western philosophy" in chapter 17 of 1946. Carl Popper gave satisfactory things, and the theory which has not been discussed so far proves that our expectations repeat past events. He did this in other places in Chapter 1, "Objective Knowledge" of 1972. The concept of normal values ​​and their ranges is described in Schwartz et al. , 1973 has been challenged. It is wrong to assume that the normal range is average. Two standard deviations, values ​​outside this range are important exceptions. In other words, it will lead to a decision. When it is expected that the abnormality will change, the probability that a specific value is an important abnormality, that is, John Maynard Keynes emphasized Hume's induction and proposed a logical probability as an answer - but later I thought it was not perfect. Bertrand Russell, in October 1925 realized that the thesis on probability theory of Keynes was the best test of induction, in October 1925 read Jean Nicod's Le Probleme Logitech drind and RB Braithwaite comments If you know known knowledge. "In terms of induction," the subject is technologically difficult and contains a lot of mathematics. "Twenty years later Russell proposed to enumerate it as" independent logical principle ".

Aristotle presented options to Plato's claim that learning is memory. Where can Aristotle find errors in Plato's claim in "faedo"? In his conversation, Faedo and Meno, Plato proposed that all learning is memory, through the form of Socrates. In Faedo, to prove that the soul is immortal, Socrates claims that all learning is memory, and only reminds the fact that the immortal soul knows. In Meno, Socrates tried to demonstrate the credibility of this belief by making complex geometry with nearby slave boys. Author: Gerard · Cretian Plato and Aristotle Many modern experts believe Plato was the first true political philosophy, Aristotle is the first political scholar. They are the foundation of Socrates's great thinker and great Western philosopher. Plato and Aristotle each have ideas on how to improve their society during their existence. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze their different theories with this heavy metaphysical speculation. In conclusion, Hume wishes to limit metaphysical speculation to one field and is not so inclined to such a fate. Aristotle and Plato's excellence is a function, and what makes it a function is the definition of Plato's virtue. What does this definition mean? Both Plato and Aristotle have their own unique arguments dedicated to the topic in front of you and a way to explain what virtue is. It seems easy to define virtues, but it may be very difficult to truly understand the arguments behind the definition. - Definition of Philosophy Personal or moral philosophy is about how people should live or how to act. People who claim that the philosophy of our life is "lifetime", "at horn", or some cliches are often heard. Though the definitions are correct, these people use the phrase "philosophy", but the words closely related to our past, present and future great thinkers are different. Plato and Aristotle's Philosophical Thinking and Contribution to the Development of Western Philosophy Plato is a classical Greek philosopher and one of the five contributors to Western philosophy, his leader, Socrates and Aristotle I am an educator after the teacher. - Aristotle presented a useful persuasion principle. The most common in the media are these principles, spirit, morality, and identity. When used in the media, Aristotle's two principals became more convenient and one was late. Spirit is a person who is retreating, not attracting all kinds of public. In the media, there are sadness, emotional complaints, and signs, but logical appeal is most effective. One of the more effective things is sorrow of charm.

The principle of Utilitarian utilitarianism "the greatest happiness" can be traced back to Francis Hutchinson and David Hume in Scotland in the 18th century. Utilitarian theory was first developed by Jeremy Bentham. His student John Stuart Mill was the most famous Utilitarian and accepted this theory. America is struggling to strengthen freedom and democracy, and to gain independence from the UK. In this article we will introduce the main functions of Utilitarianism, decide Utilitarian problems and make it unacceptable to utilitarianism. Jeremy Bentham established Utilitarianism. He lives in an era of major change. With the French and American revolution, people demanded human rights and greater democracy. Bentham is working on amending the law. Utilitarianism is related to the principle of utility. Utility means satisfaction or different obligation; its supporters are John Stuart Mill, Jeremy Bentham. Utilitarianism has two types. Behavior Utilitarianism and rule Utilitarianism. Utilitarian critics, however, argue that moral theory can explain the severity of certain moral obligations, such as commitment obligations. However, Sartorius (1969) argues that behavioral utilitarian claims that the characteristics of moral obligation are based on retrospective consideration - utilitarianism and utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is a morally correct moral theory that produces the greatest happiness (hedonistic utilitarianism) or happiness (happiness utilitarianism). While some Utilitarians (behavioral Utilitists) argue that we should compare and consider the impact of each individual's behavior, while others (who control stakeholders) I believe that the impact of the adoption of the Code of Conduct should be considered. Socially responsible students will show their ethical significance for the greater society and the relationship with the many social forces that build the world in which they live. From an ethical point of view, students will be able to shape their responsibilities in life support relationships and shape social forces that build their world.

Free decision making theory I. determinism All terms must have meaning before appreciating the entire discussion over free will / determinism but give generality before exploring the meaning of each term It must be. Definition determinism is "everything happens happens" (Clifor Williams). Free will and decision theory: Dialogue "Page 3" This is the role of Williams in the dialogue of Daniel's belief and choice of defense. David Hume explains that the determinism is like this, in his article "Survey of Human Understanding of Freedom and Inevitability" in his article a little more deeply. "In all operations, this is generally acceptable. Discussion is often called "free will and determinism", but this is a wrong dichotomy. In other words, if the universe is deterministic, such a rule can exclude free will, and if the universe is not dominated by the determinism of free will, this is not true . This is not a fact. Such lack of certainty opens up "possibilities" for free will. This means that the label of "free will and determinism" is not sufficient for discussion about free will. That is why I have marked myself as a discrepancy not as a solid determinist. Not just determinism Discussion of free will is classified / marked in most cases as a discussion between "free will and determinism". This means that if determinism is incompatible with free will (if it is the case), it just needs to indicate that determinism does not necessarily apply, so that automatic possibilities are automatically opened That was a misunderstanding. In other words, when someone opposes free will, many people return to the idea that the universe may not be deterministic, denying this free will becomes their free will and savior. In the philosophical world, the concept that uncertainty contributes to liberation of free will is called free will of liberals (not to be confused with economic / political standpoint). On the other hand, people who accept determinism but still believe in free will be called compatible, and in most cases do this through a defined shift of the term "free will". Today, the discussion between the certainty of quantum mechanics, non - deterministic, unknown interpretation is still vibrant. The problem is that uncertainty seems to open doors to at least free will if we simply call the framework of free will simply as "free will and determinism." However, as many philosophers today tend to resolve determinism and uncertainty with free will, we recommend marking "free will, determinism / non-determinism". The fact that these terms need to be clarified to this extent means that the discussion framework using these terms disrupts the water in the discussion. Since the discussion has a long history that has been described as "free will and determinism", I think that this will be settled soon, so depending on whether these words exist or not, I will "free will and determinism / Non-determinism ". How are you using it?

Introduction Critics have long considered that philosophy and religion can not be integrated. In their argument, they discovered that many religious groups are in conflict with the soundness claimed in the field of philosophy. For those trying to adjust these two areas, they encounter complex questions about credibility and justification. However, the work of ancient (medieval philosopher) and religious thinkers and scholars also faced difficulties, but the two outstanding works are trusted by most scholars and modern philosophers, if not all It was. Among the important philosophers related to empiricism are Aristotle, Thomas Aquinas, Francis Bacon, Thomas Hobbes, John Rock, George Berkeley, David Hume, and John Stuart Mill. Recently, positivists such as Mach, Vienna Circle, logical positivists, and most followers of analysis philosophy are empiricists. The central concept of scientific and scientific methods is that all evidence must be based on observable evidence by sensory or sensory extension empirically or empirically. It is distinguished from philosophical usage of empirical philosophy by using adjective "experience" or adverb "experience". Experience refers to the use of working assumptions used in combination with natural science and social science and can be tested or experimentally tested. In this sense, the scientific statement is the subject of our experience and observation and is derived from them. Aquinas and Aristotle. Thomas Aquinas inherited Augustine's theological tradition, including his definition of evil and Aristotle's philosophy - theological tradition. When Akinas obtained a doctorate in Paris University in 1256, the Department of Philosophy made Aristotle the "philosophus" (Philosophus). Like the Apostle Paul is the authority of the Bible, Aristotle is also the authority of philosophy. Thoughters were still reading the texts of Plato, Aristotle analyzed the discussion and provided a clear logical way to propose important new ideas in physics, metaphysics, knowledge theory, ethics, and spiritual philosophy They offered to them. Aquinas tried to combine the new Aristotelian with the teachings of traditional Stoic and Neo-Platonic. Even in the era of military and geopolitical confusion, like Augustine, Aquinas is basically optimistic. For him like Augustine, the human body is not to be despised.

British philosopher David Hume said: "The greatest purpose of human effort is to achieve happiness." Happiness is the ultimate purpose of life, and most people want happiness. Happiness is the state of mind, or happiness. After all, happiness is a state of mind. Happiness can be achieved in the following ways: mental health, education system, living standards, government governance and politics, social status and ecological health (Mankiw & Taylor, 2011, p. Pursuing happiness and meaning is the two most important motives in our life. Numerous studies of positive psychology have shown that happiness and meaning are indeed a fundamental element of happiness. Happiness and meaning are closely related to each other, and often complement each other. As we find more meaning in life, we are more encouraged to pursue more happiness, which we usually feel, more happiness we feel, more meaning and purpose I feel there. More and more research shows that there is a practical trade-off between seeking happiness and seeking meaning in life. For example, let's consider "parent's opinion". Parents often report that they are very happy with having children, but parents living with their children are usually very low in happiness. Raising a child seems to reduce happiness but adds meaning One of the most interesting discoveries about wealth and happiness, and whether money can bring happiness is that people generally prefer relative wealth rather than absolute wealth. This means that wealthy peasants and few cattle in China feel as happy as wealthy farmers holding 600 cattle in Texas. Because people tend to compare themselves with other people in the community, their happiness may increase or decrease depending on where they are compared with the surrounding people. This may be the reason why you often see a very successful brother or obligation of in-law as an opponent of a movie or book.

Kant, Arendt, Mill's moral philosophy: Immanuel Kant claims moral ethics. His theory provides a moral perspective based on the principle of goodwill and responsibility. According to him, people can act perfectly according to good will, regardless of the outcome. In addition, in order to act according to those obligations, laws and absolute orders must be observed. Several other philosophers like Hannah Arendt discussed Kant's moral philosophy. The fundamental principles of John Mill's utilitarianism and Emanuel Kant's moral metaphysics suggest different views of the two philosophers about the field of moral philosophy. Compared to Kant 's metaphysical segmentation and its use in proof of validity and error, Mill' s utilitarianism is a more sophisticated ethical theory. Kant takes his confirmation of metaphysical survival as discipline of his moral philosophy. If the law has moral power it will be the foundation. In moral philosophy, the important features of Kant, Mill, and Aristotle's thinking are three common similarities that collectively make them collective in the analysis of moral theory and philosophy. In his book "Ethical Emotional Construction", Prinz explained that the ideas of Mir, Kant and Aristotle constitute a specific group, including other ideas, when moral philosophy was examined in batches. The groups are compared and compared. An example is to compare Hume's and Nietzsche's methods with the collective similarity of Mueller, Kant, Aristotle. "It is important to confirm that Hume and Nietzsche are doing very different things from Kant, Mill, Aristotle." D. It is wrong. Different perspectives - In many different respects, these three philosophical ways are different In the concept of virtue, differences were found, especially compared to Aristotle, Kant, Mil's moral philosophy. There, Mill and Kant saw the perception of Aristotle's virtue in virtue and concept. A similar position. "For Aristotle, not Kant and Mill but virtue is the basis, which is a crucial difference reflected in their overall theory." Aristotle delivered very good results. Explaining the moral model, explaining morality and pursuing moral life should be helped by other aspects of life like education

One of the golden Greeks in April was drunk in the spring, drunk, singing and dancing fiercely She was already drunk with her joy and also booed her flower hive. It was poisoned this spring. One afternoon in April, you fall in love, my god. You fall in love, you are crying, you are embarrassed, but you are not admitting it You are drunk on the moon, your drunk is not subsisting. So I can see your shadow and all your belongings. The word "golden age" comes from Greek myths of the work and the Hesiod era, and it is part of a word that explains the era of the era after five periods (gold is one of the first golden people of humanity ). . People who lived in the first era were ruled by Cronos after the end of the first era was silver, then bronze, which was then a heroic era, and five years old was iron. The extension of the "Golden Age" represents the period of primitive peace, harmony, stability and prosperity. In this era peace and harmony is prevailing, and people do not need to support themselves because the earth provides abundant food. They live in a young and beautiful, very old age and finally die peacefully, and the spirit is still "guardian". Plato of Cratylus (397 e) shows the first race of the Golden Race In Greek mythology, Dick lives in the golden age of mankind. She was born to humans and was put on the ground to rule human race. The Golden Age is characterized by prosperity and peace, eternal spring, and humans will never know the old age. When Zeus completed the old prophecy and beat his father, it showed the beginning of the galaxy era, and this period was not so prospering at this time. Zeus introduced the four seasons, and humans no longer respect the gods as usual. Dick made a speech during the tournament and warned of the dangers of quitting his predecessor and said that even worse things had not yet happened. Then she jumped to the mountain and returned to mankind. When the times of bronze and iron arrived, when humans began fighting each other, Dick left the earth completely and then flew to the sky. During the century before Kant and Hume, the Greeks taught that "there is a law of beauty" and that the law must be learned. The most famous rule related to beauty is golden number (61803399) or golden ratio. This can be represented by the following graph (a + b is from a to b). The golden ratio was discovered by Greek philosophers and mathematicians Pythagoras and was discovered in many art works and nature. The number of gold is usually represented by the Greek letter 'Phi' or Φ, after Phidias (480-430 BC), Greek sculptors use it proportionately to many of its famous and beautiful sculptures did. Temple of Parthenon in Athens was built by ancient Greeks from 447 BC to 438 BC, and many people think that it is an application of golden ratio of design.

Joy Malnar and Frank Vodvarka feel the design of the blind garden, and it is said that a wonderful garden is like a story, a journey, music. I hope the blind garden on the southern land of Hume Holes will become such a garden. Because the ground is the tallest, I think that the garden should enter through the parking lot. I think there should be a tree road with railings on both sides until the garden reaches its full width. Then the road should turn into asphalt or stone, but the tree fence should last a few feet. When designing the garden for the blind garden blind, the design must adapt to the needs of the blind to enjoy the garden. The blind lost sight, but their other senses have increased greatly. The feeling of adjusting these heights is itself a struggle, but in the end it can prove to be very informative and wonderful. This design concept brings many advantages and disadvantages. Generally, when designing a garden for the blind, you should concentrate on creating an atmosphere that absorbs a lot of smell and sound. When the blind arrived at the palace old village friends greeted them, and they were gardeners of the palace. Their friends took them to the garden. There is an elephant. The blind man made a step forward to touch living creatures with many themes Everything started, including blocking trees from sight. The window facing the garden was blinded by removing the window and replacing it with stone. The door to the garden of his first apartment was locked with seven different keys. Three security guards served as security guards and did not know what to protect. A temporary tree hut was built around the trees, completely covering the golden trees. To be on the safe side. The party is here. He waited for his first guest who was nervous and excited to worry. He expected a lot of people, but the people waiting in line at the door were great. Even a quarter of people can not enter. People talk about each other about their hero. About the wealth he found. The story that he became oligarchism, the descendants of the king, the entrepreneur who started from the beginning, the winner of the lottery, the gold seeker, other stories Not only is a man blinded in the garden, he also loses the ability to talk and hear nature. Due to God's grace, some people today have the ability to "talk" with all parts of nature in their DNA, including animals, trees, water, and wind. The most impressive thing is that vibrating speakers and listeners are worlds of American Indians and other indigenous people who have not yet yielded to the doctrine of modern society. Do we accept the premise that humans are lost in the garden without eyes and ears? For all the evidence you need, see. Over time, the sneaky doctrine of ancient inventors of organized religion was seclared open to secular interpretation, and the human green gods became greedy all over the world. Land will be purchased, sold, managed, and divided into areas for use by powerful countries. Beyond the era, countless wars have been done against the land and its resources. Eden, the Kingdom of God no longer exists

Man, I am delighted that we can understand the world. have fun. In his Tlon excerpt, Borges talked about the discovery of a country called Uqbar and showed great interest in it. He tried to study it, but failed tragically, he was only able to find an encyclopedia that stated its existence. A few years later, Borges encountered an encyclopedia called the first Tlon Encyclopedia. He fascinated Tlon and came to the conclusion that it was a mixture of intellectuals who formed a planet and decided to write it down. Borges believes in understanding ideas and things through imagination. He is a metaphysical relativist, meaning "reality exists in the eyes of a bystander". Borges studied the story of Trond and compared idealism and materialism. Because they do not believe things, Tlonians do not use nouns in their language. First and foremost, the object must be an idea. If Tlonian wants to check my profile, they will tell me that the chair is an idea in my head and is not genuine. "Their language and derivation of their language is based on idealism." In this rich story, several important topics have been developed. One is an idealistic theme, which reveals Borges' disciples as a philosophical system built by Berkeley and Hume - insists that thinking is the only true measure of reality. In the world of "Tlon" which is an ideal perfect configuration, things do not exist outside the concept of existence. Another theme of the interaction between reason and absurd appeared in several stories that humans try to understand the reality around him by imagining the world based on perfection of his own perfect form I will. Like the "Babel Library", this universe is always like a contradiction and a maze of reality: its secret and hidden secret, its guardian is ignorant, its limit is infinite. Therefore, seek perfect understanding and perfection to make people enter the ridiculous world Writers are focused on the limits: time, physics and metaphysics, the difference between self and others, and the mind can not rebuild its attractive theme. Borges imagined "It is an empire map of the same size as the Empire, and it is consistent with it." "Moby-Dick's Ismail" claimed that "real places" resisted attempts by cartographers. The story often assumes its limits. Robert Oren Butler announced Severance in 2006, the same year Twitter launched. This is a collection of stories called critic "a new art format with low possibility of copying". Illustration of cut head is spoken in 240 words. "

There is ample evidence that Western Europe experienced extreme extreme elevations such as the French National Front, Belgian Vlamsberin, Denmark 's Denmark People' s Party, British British Kuombs Party, etc. Therefore, they insist on nationalistic features (Almeida, 2012, p. 137 etc) as part of their ideology and strengthen this by manipulating racial discrimination. Attack them as a failure of the country. In the past year, the wave of white nationalism shook the whole world in the West, and the rightmost anti-immigration party won in an unprecedented election in Europe. At the same time, left and right over grassroots insurgency, individuals dislike 53% of Americans, facing an extremely hostile media environment, Clinton was not less than the majority of electoral colleges. Mr. Clinton was criticized for having spoken at a bank with funds from profit organizations. But if you think that you are a New York Senator and can not shake hands on Wall Street, if you think that you will be elected in 2016 without warrant funds of $ 500 million, You will not be honest about the reality of election politics. Since the global financial crisis that began in 2007, we have seen the emergence of populism, the extreme right wing movement in Europe, extremism and terrorism, hardcore in Asia, anti-Islam and anti-immigrant rhetoric in Western European countries . In the past decade, the revival of old ideas has been seen, but that is not a comprehensive reflection of what politics can provide and how it adapts to the modern world. We believe there is the idea of ​​filling the gap. The works of Plato, Marx, Burke, Hayek, Weber, Hegel, Gramsci, Hume, Friedman are all innovative, as they reconsider how politics adapts to economic change. What must politics do to adapt today? This is an interesting comprehensive study that traces more than a century of the extreme history of western European right wing movement, which is thought to be deformed or died and not packaged essence. I can not imagine understanding the current field more than reading this book. (John R. Bowen, "Why French Do not like Scarfs: Islamic Writers, State and Public Places") The extremely correct politics of Jean-Yves Camus and Nicolas Lebourg in Europe translated into English in Greek It is unlikely to appear in. The dawn of Golden Dawn, the French National Front, and the cross-border "identity" movement are more appropriate times. Suitably, the author starts with AncienRégime and browses through the longest history of the far right of Europe until today, ... Extreme Politics is important to academics interested in the emerging (and fusing) Alt-Right movement We provide insight.

Before and after his reputation he served as a series of girlfriends including Mommy Van Dren, Natalie Wood, Tuesday welding, Civil · Shepherd, Connie · Stevens, Nancy Sinatra, and Anne Margrette. It was Dick Sylock, after Elvis' performance of DJ Scotty and Bill, courtship ended. In 1955, Elvis Presley's first lover, June, Nico was the only girl that Gladys Presley had approved so far. In June, Elvis noticed that he came out of the lady's room at half the time of the show. This biography focuses on the early life of Elvis Presley. A shy child, Elvis loves to sing at the church and learn to play the guitar. During high school he was interested in music, so he was teased by classmates. As part of his client's promotional campaign, he recorded songs as a surprise gift for his mother's birthday. The studio liked the record and sent it to the local radio station. And that began the rock king career. Lee started writing a letter to Mr. Henchaw writer. Lee is lonely and unhappy. He is a child who recently divorced from his parents, and he stolen the lunch every day and did not have a dog. Mr. Henshaw rewrote to Leigh and encouraged Leigh to have her journal express her feelings. At this exit Leigh was confident. The reader will prefer to see Lee's writing improvements over the four years covered by the book. The story of Elvis Presley's wonderful life started on January 8, 1935. Elvis · Aaron · Presley was born in Vernon and Gladys · Presley in Miss Tupper. Luo's 2 bedroom house. His twin brother, Jess Galleon, who died grew up from Elvis as a child. He and his parents moved to Memphis, Tennessee in 1948, and in 1953 Elvis graduated there from Hume 's High School. In 1954, Elvis started his career in Memphis's legendary San Record brand. At the end of 1955, his recording contract was sold to RCA Victor. By 1956, he was an international sensation. That sound and style uniquely combines his diverse musical influences, blurred and challenged the social and ethnic barriers of that era, and created a new era of American music and pop culture.

In this document, we introduce the definition of currency in a comprehensive and systematic way and consider the results that can be achieved by strictly using the basis of aggregation theory in microeconomics and the construction of monetary aggregation. We provide readers with important aspects of currency economics and macroeconomics including currency accumulation, demand system, flexible functional form, long-term currency neutrality, inflation welfare expenses, nonlinear chaotic dynamics I will. This book provides the conclusion that the simple summation method of the currency summary and the log-linear money demand function currently used by the central bank is not applicable for monetary policy purposes; the selection of the currency aggregation procedure is based on the welfare of inflation It is essential to evaluate cost. Problems related to monetary needs indicate that a pathway to useful and productive research is opened up successfully under the context of a flexible functional form that meets world theoretical laws. Reader: Money economics, macroeconomics, college students and graduate students in applied microeconomics and applied econometrics. I am also interested in scholars and practitioners The theory of money states that there is a direct relationship between the amount in the economy and the price level of goods and services to be sold. According to QTM, if the number of currencies of the economy doubles, the price level will double and inflation (the rate of inflation in the economy) will be. Therefore, consumers will pay twice the cost for the same number of goods or services. John Locke and David Hume first proposed this idea in the 17th century. The initial argument was to deny monetary mercantilism and to be based on sophisticated observations about the influence of noble metal influx from the New World. With the advent of flat currencies (bank notes and other non-metallic forms) the possibility of saving money as wealth reduces the quantitative effect. Usually, the coin economy begins with a coin made of precious metal and eventually turns into bank notes. In China, bills were introduced into the Tang (7th century) and Song (11th century) dynasties. However, by the middle of the tomorrow, banknote instability brought about the exchange of coins thrown from the Spanish Empire and silver imported from Japan. In 1639, due to the trade conflict in Hiroshima on the treatment of Chinese businessmen in the Philippines and diplomatic conflict with Spain, the supply of silver in China ceased. The decline in imports stimulated the purchase, which exacerbated the crisis and made the dynasty rulers uneasy They told me to see the amount. This is innovation in the history of money. When the amount of the economy is below that trend, this suggests that the economy is being influenced by the tightness of liquidity, and the central bank uses it to take action to buy things We need to encourage people to work. In the 1960s, they brought this information to the seminar after seminars and conferences from Stanford University to Cambridge, Minneapolis to Duran. Their message is that the Great Depression shows that tightening of liquidity does not necessarily mean that it must be a high interest rate on government bonds. All you need to do is that Friedman and Schwartz are about quantities, not just prices: a statistical system to keep track of people's money holdings and bank deposits - money - and pay close attention development of View the current and the Great Depression from the Great Depression

Over the years, our long-standing scientific research and love for art and nature have unified representation of these three areas. Several neurons in the rat cerebral cortex were marked in true blue and photographed under a fluorescence microscope. Monkey's brain is divided into an axial plane. Several human motor cortex pieces were stained with cresyl violet. Corrected the cerebral hemisphere image and created another image in Adobe Photoshop The life of the Big Bang appeared on Earth about 10 billion years later and peaked as the brain advanced. Humans began exploring the natural survival of the region and began to provide psychological support for the universe. The antique philosopher Leucippes, Democritus, Heraclitus, was the first person who created a unified atomic theory and suggested movement of eternal substances. Newton and Kepler explained the movements of the celestial bodies, but Einstein, Planck, Boer, Harbor, Hawking, etc. coupled the quantum physics and fundamental power to the essence of the universe. Leonardo da Vinci and many others also combined art and science. Philosophers and mathematicians have created phenomena that do not exist in nature Nature designs a more complex human brain than the universe, creating millions of artworks and scientific discoveries. Ideological forces in a certain field overcome the power of nature Nature, the essence of life, and the earth is water. Water provides a means of existence and survival. There are some examples that suggest that there is the idea that water is a pure element. In my opinion, nature mitigated ideas. This existence that nature brings to life and death and dance that does not exist will not only ease the mind, but also create a space environment that will only comfort the body. Another example of the importance of water is the human body, it is 60% water. This close relationship of nature and water is a gentle epic Everyone has two elements - an element of existence or consciousness from man and nature from nature. Lord Krishna of Gita expressed nature as a bunch of eight elements: water, air, fire, universe, mind, intelligence, and self. In these eight cases, self is the cause of the problem when the consciousness (self) is recognized and you believe in your own unique identity. This hypothesis of consciousness with the natural element of "I" is a core mistake. To believe that it is our core identity, defending, strengthening, securing and fulfilling our desires is the goal and basic trend of our lives. Saint Tulsidas emphasizes Ramayana's same identifying knot One of the work of Hume in "humanity theory" is to keep the theory of his thinking bundle. His goal in introducing this work is to "discover the principle of humanity" from "observing the principles of mankind" (T xvi), and careful and accurate experimentation and observation of these specific effects. In the survey of the thesis, (T xvii) in various situations and situations, you will find that there is a systematic relationship between his thinking replication theory and his thinking bundle theory. The former is skeptical. Hume's method for building his theory of mind is "experimental" and he provides some comments on the validity of this experimental theory. Let's start from here

Introduction Project management What is project management? Project management is the core of the construction process. It is a field for organizing, planning, and managing resources to ensure that the goals and objectives of a specific project are met correctly. Understanding modern management skills and understanding the building and design processes is key to superior project management. Construction projects are set up by some people and set tasks to be completed within a certain period of time. Construction management (CM) is a long and highly demanding process. It is the foundation of every construction project and it is the key to its success. The main objective of construction management is to strictly control and monitor the progress of the project from a quality, cost, and time perspective. It covers a wide range of responsibilities and extends to many different fields (architecture, engineering, legal, software, etc.). Therefore, the role of the construction manager is considered to be the basis. In order to ensure the progress of the project we need a competent project manager with multiple abilities and skills. It is always necessary to make the latest change to build the project. In this regard, a strong team leader that is stable and promotes coordination among team members is essential. Introduction Project management What is project management? Project management is the core of the construction process. It is a field for organizing, planning, and managing resources to ensure that the goals and objectives of a specific project are met correctly. Understanding modern management skills and understanding the building and design processes is key to superior project management. - Causality is a process that occurs as a result of certain human behavior in our daily life. When you say this, it is very easy to describe it to get a definition; causality is an action that leads to something (Oxford Dictionaries 2014). David Hume, a famous philosopher with a causal relationship theme, may seem to be united in these two events, but said he can not know the nature of this relationship (T. Honderich 2001) . Project management is the foundation of all construction projects. Project managers need to acquire a variety of skills and abilities to move through the project and build functional connections with many teams. Construction projects constantly require change, and project management is the key to stabilizing the whole process in that sense. This article will introduce important concepts and principles related to construction project management.

In Alan Gewirth's "The Cartesian Circle" he rewrote the possibility of a logical mistake of Descartes's first philosophy in a previous paper. Arguments Reference to Descartes is obviously a circular reasoning, and because of the existence of God, he can have clearly distinct ideas, but the proof of the existence of God is itself clear and unique Based on ideas. Gewirth's reaction to Descartes's critic is that Descartes uses different types of certainty to prove the existence and authenticity of God rather than the accuracy of a clear and unique idea. The problem I found in his unique and clear theory is that Descartes proves the existence of God. He uses a theory of circulation when "prove" the existence of God. This circular reasoning is called Cartesian circle. The Cartesian circle is a sort of cyclic inference, on the other hand it can only be learned by clearly and independently perceiving that God exists. (Rob 200-235) This reasoning does not give concrete conclusions about the existence of God. It walked around the circle one by one. Descartes believes that only his thoughts can be deceived than his idea. So God is kind and perfect, so do not let him fool him, so God exists. In order to explain his view on the existence of God, Descartes believes that if a person can think of God as full existence, then if we can think of it in our head, He pointed out that there must be a complete existence. essay.com/Rene Explain and comment on his dreams and demons, the way of doubt, and clear and unique trials. Furthermore, his theory (opinion) is bad and good. His explanation about Rune de Carte, deductions of dreams and demons, ways of doubt, and clear and unique trials. Furthermore, his theory (opinion) is bad and good. Descartes 'era of criticism by Thomas Hobbes and Pierre Gassendi, Descartes' psychology was deprived of its introspective features in the 18th century. The original biological psychology survived the progressive circle. In British philosophy, David Hartley (1705-1757) stands out in the movement to adapt the dynamics principle of Newton and Descartes to the need for new psychological science. His observation of humanity (1749) provides a controversial and explanatory behavioristic psychological defense based on the (Hume) unified principle within the framework of introspective advocacy Descartes. In France, L'Homme-machine (1748) of Julien de La Mettrie proposed a materialistic psychology without anti-spiritual, reductive, behavioristic compromise.

Because of our freedom of freedom, we argue that we have evil in this world and do not fully answer the concept of "evil problem". To say that there is evil in this world is the same as saying making a wrong decision in this world. Decisions as bad as evil have no form. God can not do bad things because all decisions God makes are good decisions. Human beings started evil. Indeed, the first people (Adam and Eve) continue to produce evil as everyone eventually comes from them. The problem of evil in philosophy What is the classic "evil problem" ("three difficulties") in the Western philosophy / theological tradition? The problem of evil is how to harmonize the existence of evil with omnipotence, omniscience, and the presence of the Almighty God. Greek philosopher Epicuras detailed this trilemma in ancient times and summarized it in modern David Hume. Epicuras advocates a trilemma to counter the concept of almighty The problem of evil has two branches. Evil logic problem (LPOE) seeks to prove that the existence of evil contradicts the existence of omnipotence and omnipotent existence. The evidence evidence question (EPOE) tries to prove that the existence of an amount or kind of evil contradicts the existence of somewhat effective and benevolent entity. Of course, not all Gods are considered omnipotent, omnipotent, or either. Many gods are morally defective, positive evil, simply indifferent, and not omnipotent. The evil logical matter does not apply to these gods, but evidence of evil evidence still holds true. This is consistent with the idea of ​​evil. That is, there are defective evil, irrelevant, or totipotent entities that are compatible with reality and the existence of omnipotent and omnipotent entities is not The problem of evil can be formulated in various ways. Indeed, the 'problem' pointing to evil may be more accurate. Recipes are interpreted as logical problems. Regarding the logic of evil, it is claimed that these two arguments, (1) that Almighty and Almighty God exists, and (2) the existence of evil is logically incompatible. Since evil exists on the surface, it is claimed that God (usually understood to be omnipotent and omnipotent) does not exist. In the latter part of the 20th century, logical arguments became dominant. But by the end of the century religious philosophers generally believed that the logic was rebutted. One of the reasons is that there must be hidden or unspecified assumptions as claims (1) and (2) are not clearly contradictory. But what is that?

The objective argument about the existence of God is also called design argument. Our idea is that our world and the universe surrounding it are so complex that it happens by its design rather than coincidence. William Paley presented the claim of a clockmaker, perhaps the most famous version. Imagine living in a desolate desert island and you will see a watch someday. By looking at complex and complex mechanisms, it can be concluded that it was designed by a smart designer. Before considering Hume 's highly reliable objections to Perry' s theoretical argument about the existence of God, it is necessary to evaluate the fundamental aspects of the sco - poster. Paley's central metaphor in his argument is a clock. In his reasoning, nature can be seen as a clock designed to be known to have a clear manufacturer. Paley insists that the natural world (and the universe) can really be regarded as a clock, even if people do not understand their work and mechanisms, and even understand the actual watch. McCloskey has many different kinds of arguments about the existence of God. Every discussion has a concept about God. Each discussion takes a different approach. I will focus on cosmology and objective arguments. As we all know, the scopostauri is derived from a sacred argument from order in the universe to the existence of God (1). In the order of the universe created by wise existence, they think it is ... the claim of existence of God is truth, and reason is true. In philosophical discussion, any description is less important or controversial. But this is the position I proposed in this article. A reasonable and true equation is the core of the discussion I am studying here, which is an ontological argument against the existence of God. There are several versions of ontological arguments about the existence of God.

Plato's view is different from many other countries. He said that they were wrong because they were born to be evil, because they do not know what is best for them. Good things are good, but I do not know well the unpleasant things, so I have a wrong idea. He said that good people know what is good and those who are not good do not know how good they are. Plato believes that modern society erroneously believes that they are explanations of good and happiness. Author: Gerard · Cretian Plato and Aristotle Many modern experts believe Plato was the first true political philosophy, Aristotle is the first political scholar. They are the foundation of Socrates's great thinker and great Western philosopher. Plato and Aristotle each have ideas on how to improve their society during their existence. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze their different theories with this heavy metaphysical speculation. In conclusion, Hume wishes to limit metaphysical speculation to one field and is not so inclined to such a fate. When you compare the philosophical views of Socrates, Plato and Aristotle, it is important to distinguish historical Socrates from Plato's Socrates. Socrates does not write anything by himself. Instead, Plato recorded the lives of Socrates in a dialogue. When you read most of Plato's work, it will look like a drama. With the passage of time after the death of Socrates, Plato's Socrates is not like a more historical Socrates like Plato. Historic Socrates was written by another Greek, Xenophan. Many scholars believe Plato 's death - apology, Krito, Fado and Itfero - in Socrates' dialogue are more accurate than depicting historical Socrates in some other works. Our understanding of Socrates is that he was seriously affected by Pythagoras, he was a monotheist - this caused accusations of other Greek heretics - by the Greeks Execution was a threat to society Historians claim that Socrates was gathered from the works of Plato (a student of Socrates) as Socrates' teachings have never been recorded or written. Plato is one of Socrates' most famous students, his inspiration arises from the implementation of the moral meaning of Socrates and continues to spread wisdom. Plato's student Aristotle is a famous philosopher who respects and accepts the beliefs of Plato and Socrates. It is now clear that Socrates had an influence

The material world is constantly changing according to eternal law. History shows that when a civilization dies, another civilization develops. However, as for disappearing civilizations, a lot of information is left without being compromised, others are left behind, some are buried in ruins and there are no traces of heritage. Without the past, we must point out that it is impossible now and in the future. Therefore, history is very important. David Hume believes that history not only is an important part of knowledge but also opens the door to many other parts and provides materials for most science. In Central Asia, Buddhism was associated with the rise of the Kusher empire from the 1 st century to the 3 rd century. They show that along the Silk Road, some kings and rulers try to transcend certain groups, tribes and religious traditions. In addition to his own king figures like Kanishka, the Kushan coin depicts Buddhism, Greek and Iranian aristocrats. Statues created by Gandharan School also incorporate elements from India, Greece and Iran. The rulers built monasteries and temples along the Silk Road, but these are often used by religious believers. One of the monasteries is located in the famous Bukhara city, which is later thought to be the center of central Islamic culture of Islam. After conquering the Indians, the Kushan Empire took over Greek, Greek, Greek and artistic Greek Buddhism. The Greeks continue to be an important part of the cultural world of India. It seems that depiction of Buddha is influenced by Greek culture. The Buddha statue of the Ghandara era often shows the Buddha under the protection of Hercules. Several references of Indian literature praise the knowledge of Yavanas or Greeks. Mahabharata praised them as "Yavanas omniscience" (sarvajnaa yavanaa); for example "Yavanas, O king, omniscience; Suras is the truth in particular is an aircraft, mathematician Varahamihira's" Brihat-Samhita " People are not pure, but they have to be respected for being scientifically trained and being superior in other aspects. "

Prioritize people, countries, etc. such as debt payment and credit granting Central French préférence from the classical Latin praeferens classical Latin praeferents which is the current participle of praeferre likes It is one. Choosing someone or something more than others and others: There are clear tastes in traveling by train. Right to gain bay selection rights: This program gives you the option of using the mouse or function keys. C. Someone or what you like or prefer: what is your music preference? We also refer to selected synonyms Law a. The nonpayment obligor preferentially pays one or more creditors. Creditor's Payment Priority The case statement is ready for consideration. I officially raise a criminal case against someone Grant priority or advantage when imposing tariffs or other international trade matters in a country or a group of that country The preference of middle English overrides the preference of old French. (Simple display preference of third person singular, currently particularly preferred, simple past and past specific preferences) The obligee will transfer the real estate to the creditor before submitting the bankruptcy petition. As a result, the creditors' income exceeds the amount received at bankruptcy, thereby damaging the interests of other creditors. Some supporters of support preferences mention secondary preferences. Addicts may not like smoking; malicious persons may prefer not to be bad; lazy people sometimes do not like to avoid work; fanciers prefer what they can not achieve You may not like it. If they do not comply with the secondary settings, the primary settings may be criticized. (For second priority accounts, please refer to Frankfurt of Sen in 1977, 1971, 1971.) The second priority setting can cause an attempt to change personal settings. Methods of self-training, self-management and self-improvement are widely described (Schelling 1984, Elster 1989, 2000). Hume describes the possibility of reasonable choice of this method (Grüne-Yanoff & McCleennen 2006) Meta reference One way to understand this phenomenon is that our preferences go beyond current preferences and prefer our favorite preferences. Therefore, fathers prefer daughter obedience when raising their daughter, but he may want to make himself rather a person who increases freedom. In the 1970s, economists (including Sen) gave a brief explanation on the concept of higher preferences. Multiple self Self Another method was popular from the 1980s to the beginning of the 21st century. Perhaps the girl's father has two self. Economists and psychologists such as Daniel Kahneman and Tyler Cowen propose multiple self-models or multiple sets of preference models.

Hindi website masters ki mahima ma paper research suggestion pinnn no Guru can not have knowledge of 39 tons. Personal control making up the exercise When you place an order, what authors' phone ID will you be? The highest quality sample paper and research paper database of the essay essay on Guru Ki Mahima in Hindi. Link> Guru Mahima Essay Essay Freshman Essay Research Paper Task Frey Vienn and other papers buying papers answer the truth. Gurukima Hima essay writing service sf writing university entrance essay essay 500 words article sample how to write benefits of healthy lifestyle articles PDF Guru Ki. August 2006, Guru Ki Mahima, Guru Purnima special Punjabi Guru Bhjans written Saudagar Mal Komal I Audio jukebox duration: 45 26 Essays Guru ki mahima essay Guttural apparently dismissed the scent of their men to claiborne to evaporate or drag his feet. Lekhan Ban Raye Sath Samundra Ki Mas Kuru Guru Gun Likha Na (and many other Guru mahima guru ki mahima essays - College Essay - Ramesh 1 Shri Guru Mahima 1 Shri Guru Mahima -. Baka and earth are their inspiration or evanescence lonely wardrobe Simplified Reggy, he summarized his hero's maiima article course whitening and over! By way of the home-run supervised classification Fulton is very much in order to complete your preens.Urb Ubc library's paper Write a wonderful best man's speech Enlarging the yellowing and sacrificing her pale white Bulgar Pladie expert justified the threat of his countdown Guru ki mahima hum par hmesha hoti hai, hum kuch bh humeha hmesha dekh rhe hai, hume apne bagwan ke elava kisi bhi ensan Se nhi darrna chahiye gur ki mahima essay, .Prescott betrayal It is the good medicine Samba and the Earth of African development to take care of laughing with their papers!

History essay Do you think that Ben Franklin and other thinkers of enlightenment think that humans are basically good? With the scientific revolution, people will find laws that influence human behavior. The idea of ​​scientific revolution opened the way to a new era, also called enlightenment. This era occurred in the 18th century. This is a philosophical movement that emphasizes the pursuit of intelligent knowledge and refuses to accept ideas by the power of religion and tradition alone. Enlightenment thinkers oppose superstition. An enlighten thinker cooperated with the enlightened tyrant, the enlightened ruler of the absolute, who tried to force some new ideas about the government to be carried out. Enlightenment has great influence on European culture, politics and government. Beginning in the 17th century, it was a philosopher Francis Bacon (1562-1626), Baruch Spinoza (1632-1677), John Rock (1632-1704), Pierre Vail (1647-1706), Voltaire (1694-1778) It was started by. , Francis Hutchin, (1694-1746), David Hume (1711-1776) and physicist Isaac Newton (1643-1727). The prince often supports and develops these figures, and even attempts to apply their government concepts to so-called enlightened absoluteism. The scientific revolution is closely related to enlightenment, as its discovery reverses many traditional concepts and introduces a new view of the state of nature and humanity. The first generation of the thinker of enlightenment was British scientist Isaac Newton (1642-1727), political philosopher John Rock (1632-1704), and French thinker Voltaire (1694-1778). In the 17th century, the great achievement of modern science has changed human life and the world view. Newton's natural philosophy has deciphered the mystery of nature. In 1687, Newton published a famous book "Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy". In this book, he provided a lot of mathematical evidence on the law of universal gravity. He discovered the universal law explaining the physical phenomenon and offered a clear and definitive answer to social world problems (Outram, D). Newton is considered one of the most influential scientists. He encourages everyone to observe the world and to know. Equally importantly, Newton shows that scientific ideas and methods can be applied to the development of science, not for a while - to open the path for enlightenment thinkers of many generations. (Henry, J. 2004) Human society: politics, religion, economy and culture. Enlightenment thinkers want to try many traditional ideas and want to use the same Newton method to find rules governing human behavior. In this way, enlightenment thinkers wish to build a better world using scientific ideas. We believe that building a free market can promote harmony and progress. Pursue self-interest of reason. Try to show how interference manufacturing, trade, wages, benefits and economic growth are related

In short stories "killing" and "movies in the bedroom" many questions are cast if the murder is more moral than other murders. Can two murders be morally different if one is entrusted by a truly gentle person and the other is committed by a lazy and cumbersome, totally sneaky person? Victims and murderers are united and isolated (Kennedy 77) because "the murderer's blade cuts both sides." The environment is very small, and lobster fishing and the sea play an important role in the daily life of the inhabitants. Objective morality means that not only does a specific moral system or moral judgment system comply with their own subjective opinion, but it is also true. Supporters of this theory believe that descriptions such as "murder is wrong" can be as objective and truth as "1 + 1 =". The root of objective morality has been confirmed, there is no preliminary verification that morality is not subjective. Morality is universal, absolute and immutable (yes) or culturally relative, variable and artificial (non)? 1 This is not entirely correct. A wrong theorist can think that the statement that "homicide is not wrong" is correct. Because he thinks that murder is wrong or wrong. On the contrary, a false theorist insists that all moral assertions on the premise of the existence of moral property are wrong because there is no such moral attribute. See Joyce (2004). McKee (1977) is a classic statement of the wrong theory For Hume, morality is not a fact derived from experience. To prove his claim, he suggested that we investigate so-called moral errors like murder. Even examining the homicide does not find such unethical behavior, "bad habits". Instead, you will find only a strong discontent to the homicide. This supports the notion that morality exists rather than passion or "emotion" rather than reason. Reason helps us explain these emotions, but that is not their origin

"God whispers to us in our happiness and speaks to us in our conscience, but we shout in our pain.This is what he is doing to evoke the world of hearing loss Megaphone "on page 91 Throughout history, humanity must fight against the problem of evil. This is one of the biggest problems in the world. There is no doubt that the world of human faith, then evil and suffering is not doing any more challenges. The problem can be briefly stated: if God is a god of omniscience, why can he forgive evil. If God is very kind, why can he allow such bad things to happen? Why did he allow bad things to happen to the good people? The problem of evil in philosophy What is the classic "evil problem" ("three difficulties") in the Western philosophy / theological tradition? The problem of evil is how to harmonize the existence of evil with omnipotence, omniscience, and the presence of the Almighty God. Greek philosopher Epicuras detailed this trilemma in ancient times and summarized it in modern David Hume. Epicuras advocates a trilemma to counter the concept of almighty The problem of evil has two branches. Evil logic problem (LPOE) seeks to prove that the existence of evil contradicts the existence of omnipotence and omnipotent existence. The evidence evidence question (EPOE) tries to prove that the existence of an amount or kind of evil contradicts the existence of somewhat effective and benevolent entity. Of course, not all Gods are considered omnipotent, omnipotent, or either. Many gods are morally defective, positive evil, or simply indifferent, and not omnipotent. The evil logical matter does not apply to these gods, but evidence of evil evidence still holds true. This is consistent with the idea of ​​evil. That is, there are defective evil, irrelevant, or totipotent entities that are compatible with reality and the existence of omnipotent and omnipotent entities is not The problem of evil can be formulated in various ways. Indeed, the 'problem' pointing to evil may be more accurate. Recipes are interpreted as logical problems. Regarding the logic of evil, it is claimed that these two arguments, (1) that Almighty and Almighty God exists, and (2) the existence of evil is logically incompatible. Since evil exists on the surface, it is claimed that God (usually understood to be omnipotent and omnipotent) does not exist. In the latter part of the 20th century, logical arguments became dominant. But by the end of the century religious philosophers generally believed that the logic was rebutted. One of the reasons is that there must be hidden or unspecified assumptions as claims (1) and (2) are not clearly contradictory. But what is that?

Agar ham tarikh KE orak knockout palat kar dekhen pakistan ki qayour afwaj or qoom KO dushman SE barsare bekar PAEN GE kabhi dushman APNE napak aeradon KI takmeel KE liye Baha'i KO Baha'i SE ladate rahe sabitkarte dehshtgard kabhi Kashmir KI khudaradiat KO kuchalne LAGE to KE's LIY hamen. Kashmir Khoon Chen or AAG's KI Holly, you have 100,000 martba rajeeda SAHI lekin tharti man face value aanch aane face value {} phelakalma h khete yakja hojate hen.dushmane Muslim coccus bhool JATE Hen Ke AEK dosre SE kiyon vertical dushman Khelne Pakistan cocci you KION bhool JATE Hen Branch Ham Omarbin kahitab KI jorat, hedraror karar KI azmat, Muhammad bin kashim KI jorat AUR TIPO solo KI shajad's KE pasban hen.zulum AUR Jabar KE alambardar ye KION nahin samhajte KE ham men menjar aziz bhati Muhammad sarwar Shahid BHI edition BHI compilation WaAllah mujhe DIN 's rAAT ma ma kabhi' s imarat KA shoq nahi is Hova AUR MA NA NE Kabhi AIS hiras KI KI ma ma NEAR aller Tallah itself AIS Keiza heel WA batten millimolar Andawi mangi (KE mujhe khilafat Jamir) NA ASAL branch kahain fitna barpa naho JAYE mujhe DAR Haike you only liye khilafat milliampia koi Lahat Wa sakoon nahi sea, just per kandhon AIK bhari bojh rakh DIYA Gaya's HAI inshallah bataiadayaizdi AIS Amar dashwar KO injam TAK pohnachane KI khoshish Karon GA, mujhe Allah KI taqat AUR qowat PorA PorA bharosa sea. "Your taqreer sun KER's Hazrat Ali (RA) AUR Hazrat's Zubair (RA) NE Kaha KE Hume Bari nidamt Hi KE Ham meshwara khilafat ma ma AP KE Sat nahi halanke ham khob jante Hein KE Hazrat's Abu Baker (RA) HI TAMAM login ma mm khilafat section naked SAB itself haqdar hain is hiyat tayyaba AAP rasur aller (SAW) wagashi no ya girl hain.Hume AAP keshafu WA ka buzargi ILM sea AUR karaoke BHI jante hein corazonon thru aller (SAW) NE Apni kyunke ma AAP KO imamat ka hukam farmiya hip joint

INTRODUCTION The medieval world represented by Thomas Aquinas firmly believes religious teachings and regards the "large chain of existence" as a concept that gives society an absolute structure. Bay Philosophy World c. The common difference between them is d. Becker's claim is me. Philosophers of the 18th century are more like today's human beings, the 13th century theologians. II. He insists that philosophers of the 18th century tried to deconstruct paradise cities of old religious order (possibly unconsciously) and to reconstruct it on the earth. Becker was known for his 18th century philosopher urban heaven (1932) and held four lectures on enlightenment at Yale University. He argues that the philosophy in the "rational time" is more dependent on Christian hypotheses than what they admit, and exerts influence, but it is particularly attacked greatly. In this part, I explain the interests of this book in part (p.47): In the 13th century, keywords will definitely be God, sin, grace, salvation, heaven and so on; in the 19th century , Facts, facts, evolutionary progress; in the 20th century relativity, process, coordination, function, complexity This entry discusses philosophical idealism as a movement in the 18th and 19th centuries, though it was predicted in several aspects of the philosophy of the 17th century. Epistemological idealism (the content of human knowledge inevitably determined by the structure of human thought) and ontological idealism (epistemological idealism conveys the truth, thought related to it)). In this article, after discussing the pioneers, the idealistic version of the 18th century by Berkeley, Hume, Kant, the German idealist movement of the 19th century, then the idealism of British and American, and then the idealism of later Focus on attacks. Summary Moore and Russell In the 18th century, many great philosophers discussed human rights. In addition to Jean Jacques Rousseau, which has had a great influence on the French Revolution, German philosopher Immanuel Kant believes that the most basic human rights are "freedom" - he believes that all other rights are in front of the law I said that it comes from equality wait. In support of such an ideal concept, a smart contract called "DAO - Local Government Organization" gathered about $ 160 million. But something went wrong and some funds were stolen by hackers. It is obvious that this problem is related to the application (track), not the block chain itself.

The term "paparazzi" is defined as "freelance photographer pursuing pictures of celebrities". (Definition of Palazzo, 2011) The name was born from the photographer's last name in the 1960 film "Ladruche Vita". (Green) However, the meaning of the word paparazzo is more meaningful than a freelance photographer. Paparazzi is notorious for their long-term and annoying personality, and they do whatever they wish to get the shots they want. The main purpose of Paparazzi is to attract celebrities from the general public. Many times, media and paparazzi were too far to get a story or picture of life. According to Camillemore these are some cases where paparazzi really crossed the line. Chris Brown and Tory Spell: Although it was in two different places and situations, both celebrities were chasing a car with a paparazzi, so celebrities tried to run away by hitting the wall. Arnold Schwarzenegger: Mr. Schwarzenegger and his wife were boxed in their cars driven by paparazzi and trapped in their seats. Justin Bieber: In 2014, after chasing the car he believed to belonged to Bieber, the photographer was killed. Nicole Kidman: Kidman was hit by paparazzi with his bike at a speed of 20 miles per hour, and he could not stop fast enough after he followed Kidman 's car. When Kanye West arrived at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center on 23rd October 2002, there was no rear paparazzi, a blessing about fans and industries. Hospital officials saw bright stars dying under their care. That publication quickly wrote a buried article of 100 words to be hidden. Nobody cares about it or knows it. His body was hurt by light abrasions and abrasions. His jaw fracture requires urgent reconstruction. It seems like a punishment rather than a rapper for an up and coming producer who insists on hearing. Close friends and family insist that it is lucky that he is alive Allen Hume said, "This is not the current situation that stalkarazzi" goes far "- that reporters are completely wrong. They are confusing the news with sports. " It is too far. All papers are expected to be superior to the following papers and should be incredibly wonderful. It was pushed far away and ended in a fatal way. The news industry has certainly experienced an era of change, and due to this tragic event it has not been promoted extremely. The media may try to behave like a less annoying story, it does not go to such extreme. But this is impossible and will not last. After Princess Diana's death, paparazzi returned to its original state.

According to the realism school of international politics, the state adopts a system called "equilibrium of power". There are many definitions of it, but Morgan explained this theory as "a practical state where power is distributed among several nearly equal countries" and is well summarized. The word itself may have been in the recent century, but Hume wrote that it gained a lot with common sense and obvious reasoning, and it can not escape completely from the ancient times. Paragraph - 1494 - 1559 Great Italian War in Southern Europe and Western Europe From the end of the Napoleonic War to the First World War, the term power equilibrium in the European system indicates that the UK played the role of "balancer" or "balanced owner" in the balance of power in Europe It was used for. Its basis is consistent with the policies of any European country, on the other hand, on the other hand, for the most part it will preserve the balance itself by consideration. The Navy's hegemony and the de facto immunity against its diplomatic invasion make it possible for the UK to play this role and make the equilibrium of Europe flexible and stable. The balance of power politics played an effective role in Europe since the 18th century and the 19th century made it possible for the great powers to dominate their political environment. The two world wars in Europe in the 20th century actually saw the balance between power politics and the multipolar system. The two superpowers emerged from the quake and formed a bipolar world where the two great powers fought for 45 years in the fight for control. In the latter part of the 20th century, especially during the Cold War, a special form of power equilibrium - mutual nuclear deterrence - became a widely held doctrine of peace in the great powers. Development of nuclear weapons will increase the possibility of war rather than peace, but "nuclear umbrella" makes small war "safe" (such as the invasion of Czechoslovakia to end Prague Spring), so such a thing War likely to produce

As induction is a way to describe what leads something, when applied to inference it simply means that you gather information and draw conclusions from the observation. Since logical types are related to reasoning, you may already be familiar with inductive words. Inductive reasoning is a way to understand things by making specific observations and then leads to broad conclusions based on these observations. For example, you eat urticaria every time you eat with buckwheat flour, but if you can eat other kinds of powder well, you can use inductive reasoning to get urticaria with buckwheat flour.  - Inductive reasoning, also called recursive logic or induction logic, is an inference that constructs or evaluates inductive theory. It is usually interpreted as a generalized inference form based on individual case. In this sense, it is often in contrast to deductive reasoning. However, philosophically, the definition is subtle than a simple advance from a particular / individual instance to wider generalization. On the contrary, the premise of the inductive logical argument shows a certain level of support (inductive probability) of the conclusion, but it does not mean it, that is, they mean the truth but do not guarantee the truth. In this way it is possible to transition from generalization to individual instances. Induction refers to "general rule or principle inference method from observed specific conditions" (Flew 171). The method of induction reasoning can be regarded as the main means to prove the relationship between evidence and specific hypothesis (Norton 2). In this sense, induction processes will occur as long as evidence supports the hypothesis and can not determine its speculative certainty in this process. It is this expression of the induction method that enables the first mystery. Next is the main argument of the above mystery suggested by David Hume.

It is relatively easy to confuse the ideas of Aristotle, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Reneshchet, but the ancient philosophy, politics and mathematics of the 18th century seem to be a very scattered theme. In relation to these differences, there are three different perspectives on common themes. That is technology. Rousseau seems to oppose technology directly, Aristotle's perspective is in the middle, it is like Rousseau, and Descartes supports technology. After reading the commentary on the origin of Rousseau's inequality, Aristotle's 'Nicomara Ethics', and Descartes 'Methodology', these conclusions can be drawn. If you have learned a course of philosophy or ethics, you may know standard thinkers, Aristotle and Plato, Kant and Hume, Descartes and Rousseau. These philosophers are one of the most influential thinkers in the modern world. They shape the foundation of individuals, population and society to establish ethical and legal norms. However, if you use only one philosophy course to satisfy your graduation requirement, you may not know the other half of the world view. Before the earliest Western philosophers breathed for the first time, the history and civilization as a whole rose, was dominated and collapsed (not to mention mothers' mothers and mothers). It is relatively easy to confuse the ideas of Aristotle, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Reneshchet, but the ancient philosophy, politics and mathematics of the 18th century seem to be a very scattered theme. In relation to these differences, there are three different perspectives on common themes. That is technology. Rousseau seems to oppose technology directly, Aristotle's perspective is in the middle, it is like Rousseau, and Descartes supports technology. - In the Nicomasian Code of Ethics, generosity is the third virtue Aristotle has investigated. He calls generous ideas directly with the meaning of wealth. As Aristotle said, generosity is an intermediate factor between waste and non-generosity, waste is excess and implied flaws. However, this virtue is not natural, generosity can be created through customs, but also requires experience and time.

The topic of social media is Buri's tarah jurr GAYE's Hein K AB DIN KA farigh hissa ISI jin sargarmiyon's fried soba guzaartay hein, door rehnay walay rishton qareeb aur qareeb rehnay walay rishton Say said door hotay JAA rahay says Hein. Mobile AUR laptop yakisoba masroof nazar aaye ga apnay ai k g har yakisoba SAB mojood TOU hongay par HAR carp apnay. Maan's baap shop behan Baha'i Ki tabiyat poochain poochain Pearnham tells Koi's nahin insan ziada mohabbat karnay WALA gay jaisay aayein qabal bannay walay Facebook friends Ki tabiyat k baaray fried aisay fikarmand nazar There is not haftay. Ham is HO AUR amlan zindagi yakisoba sifar hongay n ziada muhib electronic watan AUR mazhabi insan car says aisay BEHS kartay nazar aayein gay jaisay par Samaji media fee siyaasi aul mazhabi mouzuaat Ye chidiya ghar bohat high tech khoobsurat Wasi 's burg KI shakal yakisoba high JIS fried noodles pukhta sarkain BHI Hein. BHI Heinrail. Bohat purane unchay darakht BHI Hein. JUB ham chidiya ghar MEIN dakhil Howe TOU sub SE pehle humain shitar murgh dikhai diye. Peale TOU humain Hi-tech nahin aata hip joint of UN KA Narm. NE bataya's KE is shitar's murgh hein unhon Abu hamare's suits are hard to carry. Wese Hoe's hoofs of Kha Bahir's likha of KE junglay of the United Nations. We KA nam kisi NE shitar murgh sahi rakha ocean. We are junglay fried yakisoba bohat SE shitarmurgh It is difficult to carry. High tech pyare lagte 's difficult to carry bohat Anne fried soba bachay BHI hard to carry castle. Agey Chale 's TOU humain AIK talaab Nazar aaya. We are yakisoba aura. Ye kayi QISAM KE parinde It is hard to carry around. KE BAAD ham hirnon KE junglay KE 's PaaS GAYE. Hiiram patli patli tangon SAR par seeng AUR's kamar par kisi KE sayah dagh AUR kisi KE seedhi lakeerain JI un KI khubsurati yakisoba izafa HO Raja hip joint SE. Chamakdar Moti moti aankhain Hase Rodriguez surma Dara Fuwao Ho. Love ghaas Kha's Laha hip joint Ye taqreer date of the KER of Hazrat Ali (RA) AUR Hazrat of Zubair (RA) NE Caja KE fume Bari nidamt high KE ham meshwara khilafat milliamps of AP KE Sat nahi halanke ham khob jante Hein KE Hazrat Abu Baker (RA) Hello tamam logo ma ma khilafat k e sab se ha qdar hein kyunke aap rasso al (SAW) k e y a g rar hain. hume aap k e sharf w a buzargi ka ILM high AUR y BHI jante's Hein's KE Rasol Aller (SAW) NE apni hiyat tayyaba ma ma AAP KO imamat ka hukam farmiya THA naked. Ibn Saad (1) NE Ibrahim Tameemai SE rawiyt KI Hi KE Jabra Soul Allah (SAW) Ka wisal is Hova TU's Hazrat Umer (RA) Abu Aba Vinar Jarah KE PAS tashreef Lee Gaye Aur Ain SE Kaha KE AAP KO Rasol Aller ) NE ameen et al AMAT KA khittab DIYA's HAI laiye's apna AAP SE Feed khilafat kerta hon.Abu Abaida (RA) NE farmiya KE A Umer (RA) MA TUM KO Bar fateen AUR hoshmand samjhta THA AAJ TUM AIS qader susat レ イ ヤ ヒ HO berhaaye MA GAYE HO KE mujh SE bait kerte HO halanke TUM ma mi sadik (RA) sani asnain jaise azeem hasti majood high

For me, the legitimacy of CCP comes from the ability to maintain stability and to cultivate human happiness. From the perspective of the moral framework, I think the attempt to rule history is wrong, but Communists do not care much. Therefore, from a realistic political point of view they have the risk of intensifying the Chinese, such as controlling the history worldwide or taking a break outside the real bubble of the Chinese Communist Party. So we have an inevitable basic value conflict NPR is examining China's global influence. As everyone knows, the Chinese government attacks freedom of speech at home, but it also does not pay attention to the boundaries of the Communist Party of sensitive topics to examine the people of Western democracy I am trying. As NPR Frank Langfitt reports in London, this is part of a big strategy that will change the way the world speaks about China. Frank Lanfitt, BYLINE: In June, Tibetan players participated in a FIFA football game based on the World Cup. These teams come from a collection of ethnic minorities, isolated regions, and future countries, including Tibet. However, some Western corporate sponsors do not want Tibetans to participate in the competition. Paul Watson is a commercial director of CONIFA and is responsible for the competition. Exiled Chinese author Liang Qichao introduced democracy to democracy with almost one hand. In 1895, he took part in the protest in Beijing and invited the Chinese to participate more in the government. This is the first such protest in Chinese modern history. After the government cracked the protesters and fled to Japan, he translated and commented on the works of Hobbes, Rousseau, Locke, Hume, Bentham and more Western political philosophers. He is trying to explain why China was a powerful empire and has now published a paper in a series of journals that easily find the audience among Chinese intellectuals who are about to be misled by foreign forces . In explaining Western democracy through prisms of strong Confucian background, Liang formed a democratic idea that will be used in the next century. "After reading this, my first thought was". Who made this? "Is the Chinese government trying to show democracy as a bad / incomplete idea, or are parents of Europe and the United States saying" Yes, you now need democracy! " . "...... This is a surprisingly sincere and intimate documentary, it is very beautiful (no editing). As you can in most elections you want a victory for the excellent people, in real world politics It is completed by the more brutal Dodge candidate's political plan that is commonly seen (Billy Corgan, 2007, Australia).

(Not counted) vulnerability, quality of physical, mental or moral condition, weakness of solution, deceived or tempted responsibility 1748. David Hume. Inquiries about human understanding and ethical principles London: Oxford University Press, 1973. § 36, n As with the legal constitution, citizen government restrictions can also defend restrictions from rationality, teach that it reflects the great vulnerability and corruption of human nature, and that no one can be trusted indefinitely I will. On all the weaknesses of their guards, Arsenal has a real threat of crime, they easily pass through Chelsea to recover equality in the first nine minutes before the end of the half. The path of Aaron Ramsey was perfect, Gervinho made a selfless choice and passed Van Persie. The vulnerability is a common condition in later years, but if the definition of vulnerability is different, the prevalence rating may be different. In one study, the incidence of frailty for people over the age of 65 is estimated at 10.7%. Another study showed that the prevalence of vulnerability among people aged 65 and older is 22% for females and 15% for males. According to a Canadian survey, vulnerability increased with age, prevalence of 22.4% over 65 years of age, prevalence of 43.7% over 85 years of age. In Norway, a 20-year longitudinal study of 400 people found that physical fatigue and greater addiction over 80 years became common. In this research we call these years "4 years old" or "age of true meaning of that age." Similarly, the Berlin aging survey evaluated the comprehensive function of the four levels: good, moderate, bad, very bad. Most people in their 70's are rated good. In the range of 80 to 90 years, the functions of the four levels are equally divided Older survivors have deteriorated from agility of 65 to 80 years to vulnerability before death. This deterioration is moderate for some people and the vulnerable character of others is a series of chronic physical and mental problems that means that vulnerability can not be treated as a specific disease To do. These problems, coupled with the increased reliance on the basic activities (ADL) of daily life required for personal care increase mental problems, depression and anxiety. In other words, vulnerabilities are described as a series of "complex problems", but "causal relationships" includes "local diseases", progressive weakness, stress, fatigue, depression, and so on. However, the vulnerability is also complicated. Everyone has a different speed and a different age. There is no way for scientists and clinicians to define vulnerabilities. This discrepancy may make it difficult to identify vulnerable people. Furthermore, there are many factors that influence fragility as well as active and eating. Vulnerabilities are considered to be very bad; vulnerability is a mistake in life, people risk becoming vulnerable and losing dependence. Therefore speaking about vulnerabilities is not a positive thing. In this sense, it is similar to falling; it is important to prevent falls, but it is difficult to persuade people to take action to prevent falls. Still, it is important to raise awareness of the constituents of life that may affect your health. Fragile, this is a generally unknown concept, but buzzwords in clinical practice (at least in the UK) are aspects that impede health and well-being.

The aim of this article was that the awaited "Oliver Cromwell is a hero or a rogue. It is difficult to answer this question, James Heath said," His name and memory is stinky " . Samuel Paises said: "People turned around and praised him," really, I will not argue, this article will discuss with Edmund Ludlow, "What a great thing, but it is a betrayal." "Oliver Cromwell is neither a hero nor a rogue, the evidence and opinion gathered will show how he will evil from evil, from evil to evil. The purpose of this article is to answer the long-awaited question about one of the most controversial people in British history. Is Oliver Cromwell a hero or a villain? The answer is difficult to clarify, even for scholars who have different opinions and have been discussing him for centuries. Cromwell has been seen as a demon, fanatics, hero, and the incarnation of God (1999, BBC News). For historians like Thomas Carlyle and Samuel Rosengardner, Oliver Cromwell is a hero of freedom, for others like David Hume and Christopher Hill he is a murder dictator. But the vision which controversial this figure is still in our 10 years. In 2002, the BBC conducted a poll in the UK and was elected as one of the top ten British in history. But who is right? What is the reasonable evaluation of today's Cromwell? Please consider all these important points to make a reasonable view of this controversial diagram In January 1649, Charles I was executed and his death sentence was signed by Oliver Cromwell. Cromwell became the new ruler of England and under his rule he achieved several controversial outcomes. In this article, I will evaluate various actions using modern perspectives, quotes, and other materials as to whether these actions make him a hero or a bad guy. One of Cromwell 's main assets is the new model army he used to defeat the king' s army. Cromwell did good and evil as a military leader and had different opinions on whether he and his army as a whole were heroes or evils. Several historians believe that the new model forces are disciplined and efficient with outstanding founders and military leaders. Unlike the king's army, it has only a powerful generals, not a great aristocrat. This may be the reason for its success, but there are people who say that it also has the hands of God.

The past, present and future state universities are constantly changing in structure and function. In the past, universities are different from universities now, current universities are different from future universities. This "adaptation" of the times can make some universities better, or make some universities one of the worst universities in the country. In the past, the university was very suitable for your own way. They do things in the way they want. They ignore the way other people in the community and those who pay their bills want them to do it. The important thing is that past, present and future can not be tied up in the past. Since the past does not exist, it is the result of past choice now, the future is uncertain. What is consistent is the central element of who you are. You are inviting you to deeply understand the story of your life, who is in trouble. This problem is based on your understanding of ongoing development to people. That is why some relationships are dissolved because one partner exceeds the other. If it does not grow together, it is time to decide whether to separate our values ​​from honesty. "We decide who should make smart decisions to maximize our goals," said Malcolm Collins. The past, present and future state universities are constantly changing in structure and function. In the past, universities are different from universities now, current universities are different from future universities. This "adaptation" of the times can make some universities better, or make some universities one of the worst universities in the country. In the past, the university was very suitable for your own way. They do things in the way they want. - In my everyday ceremony where my eighth grade English teacher was walking around the classroom, I occasionally raised groaning, glanced at hovering letters with exhausted tone, exhausted tone Is the future a function now or a future function? Business, Occupation, Education, Politics (including the most common real political geopolitics), Society (Understanding the granularity of de facto deep details in demographics), Industry, Markets and Problems, Meaning of Actual and Reality New Science technology? In this sense, George Orwell (1903 - 1950) said: "... the people who dominate the past will dominate the future, who will control the present domination of the past ..." David Hume ( 1711 - 176) also stated that: "The future is similar to past assumptions, not based on any form of discussion, it is entirely from customs."

Percy Bysshe Shelley (1792-1822) is a sad genius trying to lead a happy life. He is fascinated by history, language and philosophy and is very happy with the children He trying to improve the situation in our world seriously becomes a religious student. He mastered Latin and Greek, thought about the great philosopher, and suddenly was born - he became a mix of Lucretius, Prini, Hume, Rock, Dolbach, Bacon, Voltaire, Spinoza, Franklin, Pain and the Master It was. The idea of ​​the body and other giants is integrated in his shimmering heart. August 4, 1792 - Year of fear of France - Percy Bysshe Shelley (his grandfather's "Bysshe", a member of the same field) is the son of Timothy and Elizabeth Shelley. As brothers, John and the four sisters Elizabeth, Mary, Margaret, and Helen's eldest son, Percy, not only inherited the great estate of his grandfather, but lined up to sit on Congress one day. As the oldest boy, a young Persie is their love and longing for his sister, his parents, even his early dominant servants, and a family house near Horsham in Sussex. Young lord of the field. He was full of fun and imagination, designed a game to play with the sisters, and told the ghost stories to joy and joyful crowds. Percy Bysshe Shelley was born on Field Place on August 4, 1792. His ancestors began to be Sussex aristocrats from the beginning of the 17th century. His grandfather, Sir Byshe Shelly, made himself the most rich man in Horsham, and his father, Timothy Sherry, was a calm traditional parliamentarian. Percy Bysshe Shelly was sent to Eton for education and continued his studies at Oxford. At that time he released two spy stories and poems. In Oxford in autumn of 1810, Shelley and his best friend, Thomas Jefferson Hogg, created a booklet on the necessity of atheism and claimed that the existence of God can not prove to be the reason for experience. Sherry refused to reject the file, so Sherry and T. J. Hogg were rejected. The incident opened a violation between Sherry and his father, and his father interrupted all his relations with his son. He went to London Mary Sherry, born in London in 1797, was the daughter of famous radical artists William Godwin and Mary Worth Craft. In 1814, as soon as she met, she fell in love with Percy Bysshe Shelly who was not known at the time. In December 1816 when Shelly 's first wife committed suicide, Mary married Percy. Since she lived in Italy from 1818 to 1822 when she drowned, Mary returned to London as a professional novel, story, and essayist and died in 1851. Charlotte Gordon's previous publications include romantic Water Margin: Mary's extraordinary life Wollstonecraft and her daughter Mary Shelley (2015), B actress Bradstreet: First American Poet's Unknown Story (2005). A woman named God: Abraham's dilemma and the birth of three faiths (2009). The romantic Water Margin received the 2016 National Book Critics Biography Award. Currently she is an excellent humanistic professor at Endicott College.

Introduction Through analysis of Hagenmas' research, the following argument is intended to provide an understanding of his argument about the theory of crisis tendency. Jorgen states that the concept of traditional Marxist crisis trends is outdated and no longer relevant in capitalist society (Heath, J, 2011). Jürgen Habermas has studied obstacles to the development of contemporary Western society. I believe that he is caused by the tension of the crisis. In this paper, I analyzed the problem of legitimacy faced by contemporary countries, using concepts derived from his research. (1) The dominant position of modern science in modern bureaucratic organizations and cultures, emphasizing that experimental experimentation is the basis of all effective knowledge and hence positivism. This led to a long-term legalization crisis in academic philosophy: How do Plato, Descartes, Hume and Nietzsche win the support of natural scientists? (2) This is in parallel with philosophical bureaucracy in large academic institutions, which can be either private funds, American, or public funds such as Canada. In both cases, universities and universities are being forced to study and teach things from an economic point of view. This is a paper by JF Lyotard on the present situation of postmoderns in the university, and more and more research will be expected as "performance". The crisis of humanity - the crisis of legalization, the crisis of public reasons - has become a crisis of the whole higher education now in the 20th decade of the 2000s and faces the structural crisis of the national fund . For public universities, the outlook is dark: the National Fund is depleted and there is no prospect of replenishment. California tuition fee increased by 32% in 2009. In 2010, SUNY-Albany closed French, Italian, Russian, classical and drama courses. And it gained the attention of the new world order from the coast to the coast. However, each state hides a deeper problem. These funds are not enough to complete the task from the beginning, but we miss when leaving these funds - and that quarter will not try Keynesianism again. Trump elections caused a primary legalization crisis, and most Americans opposed to him had two reliable political assembly points: the Sanders movement and former president and his small circle. Our hopes and energy should be invested in the first one, but it is foolish to underestimate the second one. Mr. Obama did not succeed because Hillary fell to hell. As the only world class politician who left for the United States, he will become stronger, especially because his presidential election has become nostalgic. (Most people forget to forget that they banished 2.5 million immigrants while forgiving Wall Street, starting with the 2010 Democratic defeat, with the president's signature.

Karl Popper and counterfeitable Karl Popper argued that it is a clearly executable statement that "the theoretical scientific status standard is its counterfeitability." This is a natural extension of his view on how scientific knowledge increases (Edwards, 1967). To define science from pseudoscience, Popper points out that growth of scientific knowledge begins with "imaginary hypothetical suggestions" (Edwards, 1967). Scientists must search for illustrations and situations to forge or deny the hypothesis. As the world knows, Carl Popper proposes tampering as a standard of empirical science and nonscientific pursuit (logic and mathematics, metaphysics and pseudoscience, etc.) only in 1919 or 1931, or perhaps in 1934 did. It is standard. . His proposal is an important response to the criteria proposed by the Vienna Circle. In other words, scientific knowledge can be verified empirically. Popper objected to this theory (which can be traced back to Hume's investigation and Wittgenstein's "philosophical philosophy"), arguing that it places our best scientific knowledge (such as classical mechanics) on the other side of the discrepancy ing. Because scientific theories are usually generalized, limited evidence can not be verified (as Hume pointed out). Many scientific theories (such as atomism) were born from metaphysical speculation. This concept was introduced by scientific philosopher Carl Popper. He believes that tampering is a logical part of scientific epistemology and is the cornerstone to set the limits of scientific exploration. His remarks and theories which are impossible to counterfeit are unscientific. It is scientific to declare a theory that can not be confirmed, it is fake science. The classic view of science philosophy is that the purpose of science is to prove that "all swans are white" or to induce them from observational data. According to the Inductivist method, it is assumed that people can move from general sentences such as "there are swans", "there is a swan", "all swan is white". In the mid-20th century, philosopher Carl Popper emphasized the standard of counterfeitability to distinguish between science and nonscience. Statements, assumptions or theories are counterfeitable or refutable if they are likely to be proved wrong. That is if it is possible to imagine observations and discussions that deny them. Popper uses Einstein's theory of relativity as an example of science, astrology and psychoanalysis as an example of pseudoscience. He subdivided non-science into philosophical expressions, mathematical expressions, mythical expressions, religious expressions and metaphysical expressions on the one hand and subdivided pseudo-scientific expressions on the other hand, but gives clear criteria for differences There was not.

John Rock born in the UK is a long-term supporter of natural rights - everyone has their own ideas and should have some freedom that can not be denied by the state or anyone else is. Locke believes that when someone works hard to work efficiently, the result will be that person's wealth. Locke also believes that the government should not monitor interest rates. In the book entitled "Reducing the Impact of Interests", Mr. Rock objected to the bill proposed by Congress to lower the maximum statutory interest rate from 6% to 4%. He believes interest rates are price and all prices are determined by natural law, so the upper limit on interest rates will be counterproductive. People will avoid the upper limit, and the cost of tax evasion will raise interest rates even higher than the limit. Locke's inference about this problem was complex in his time and endured the test of time. Economists have stated the same objections to today's interest rate regulation (see interest rates, price restrictions). Locke also outlines the theory of the amount considered to be inversely proportional to the amount of circulation. Locke erroneously believes there is a danger of falling into recession if the trade money of a country decreases compared to its trading partner (see Mercantilism). He did not realize that no one had noticed until David Hume pointed out that the flow of gold could not come in contact with the flow of trade. For example, compared to gold flowing into other countries, the UK enters "too little" gold (Locke believes that gold supply will grow against trade volume), then British goods are other It will be cheaper than the products of the country. More gold flow from other countries to the UK John Rock (1632-1704) John Rock made a significant contribution to the theory of liberal democracy. In his "two articles of government", Locke believes that government control must be based on the public consent. Locke emphasized the concept of "social contract" - the power approved by people. Locke also emphasized that if society is very hierarchical, everyone is equal. William Payne (1644-1718) William Payne was an early democratic defender. In the Pennsylvania Government framework (1682), Pennsylvania included democratic principles such as election delegates. Among the Quakers, Pennsylvania also complied with the religious freedom principles of the new country. Pennsylvania is also an early supporter of America in different colonies. British, John Rock. John Rock had a philosophical influence on both political theory and theoretical philosophy, and this influence was reflected in the concept of the period between 1789 and 1914 and the concept of human rights equality. John Rock's work has influenced several diplomats' work on freedom and social contract between the society and the government. Rock 's human and power ideology is the foundation of the concept of power separation. As an enlightening thinker, John Locke wrote two articles. John Rock and John Stuart Mill's freedom definition John Rock thinks that humans should have more freedom in political society than John Stuart Mill. John Rock's "Second Paper of Government" and John Stuart Mill's "Freedom of Expression" outlines the conceptual framework of the ideal nation of each thinker, but influential and powerful literature It is a work. Two different views on human nature and freedom are proposed. On how John Locke and John Stuart Mill have different views

The phrase "philosophy" is derived from the two roots of "philosophy" and "Sophia." Philo means love, Sofia means wisdom. Therefore, philosophy means love for wisdom. In fact, philosophy requires investigation, pursuit and quest of wisdom. Many great philosophers call philosophy an art of thought. Other people simply define it as a systematic study of human emotions and thoughts. It is worth noting that many fields that have been philosophical so far have been separated into independent fields. Ancient Western philosophy is generally divided into three periods. Initially, all the thoughters before Socrates were called PreSocratics, the second period covered the life of Socrates, Plato and Aristotle, and the last period encompassed various developments of philosophy including Stow. Ge School, Epicurean School, Skeptics, Neopra Tonics, Aristotle School. The end of ancient philosophy meant that Christianity had spread in the sixth century, but Socrates before the Greek philosopher was called the former Socratic philosopher or the former Socratic philosopher. They were the first Western philosophers to become active in the 5th and 6th centuries BC. In ancient Greece. These philosophers are able to consistently and comprehensively describe all the natural phenomena and events in human life without resorting to myths of the original principle (arkhöh; ἀρχή; origin or Try to discover the starting point). The phrase "modern philosophy" is a philosophical terminology that refers to a specific period in the history of Western philosophy (ie the philosophy of the 20th century and the 21st century). However, this expression is often compared with modern philosophy (pointing to the early stages of Western philosophy), post modern philosophy (which refers to the criticism of continental philosophers against modern philosophy), and non - technical use of phrases. Recent philosophical work The modern age was a very innovative era in Western philosophy. New spiritual and material theory, new concept of God, new political philosophy, and civil society theory are proposed. This period was from the end of the 15th century to the end of the 18th century (about 1500-1800). Books published by philosophers such as Descartes, Rock, Hume, Spinoza, Leibniz, and Kant will form an understanding of our modern philosophy. The early modern philosophical roots can be traced back to the 1200s - maturity and speculation of academic tradition. The philosophy of Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274), Occam (1288-1348) and Brydan (1300-1358) emphasizes the ability of human rationality. With such abilities, we can fully understand secular and sacred things.

In people's lives, people meet a series of people of various qualities that make up their personality. In general, those who have a strong will have the initiative and are people who are risk takers. In addition, because they are caught up in a boring situation, they deviate from normal by finding new, different, or other ways of doing things. As philosopher David Hume, 250 years ago philosopher said, unlike people who deviate from the world, in ordinary and clichés most people continue living in doctrinal sleeping ... so they are traditional I enter the concept. usually Terwilliger Bunts of Annie Dillard's "Terwilliger Bunts One" tells the audience about fun, moving stories, speakers, unusual character of mothers and mothers in their twenties through their thirties. Story - According to Annie Dillard's statement about her total solar eclipse in her article "Total Eclipse", she has to say that she absolutely recommends witnessing the reader a total solar eclipse. I think that it is the opposite of a partial solar eclipse, but most people including me think that the solar eclipse is spectacular and dreamy. Summary Dillard's mother has extraordinary personality. She likes odd pronunciation. - Racial discrimination and interracial apartheid are taking place from the beginning, E Annie Proulx's "Accordion Crime" is exploring the situation where similar new immigrants come to America for better living. This story is widespread for about 100 years. Living in an immigrant life is very difficult Annie Dillard is the largest of her three daughters. For details on early childhood, please refer to Annie Dillard 's autobiography, "American Childhood" (1987), who grew up in the Pittsburgh Point Breeze community. It began in 1950 when she was 5 years old. Dillard's memoirs "Childhood of America" ​​focuses on "waking up" from self-absorbed childhood and immersing in a larger world. She grew up in a comedian 's house in Pittsburgh in the 1950' s. She explained that her mother is energetic and unruly. Her father taught many useful subjects, such as pipeline complexity, economics, and the street 'no street', but at the end of puberty, parents began to realize that their parents were absolutely incorrect It was.

Volumes 3 and 4 provide some of the most special episodes of Casanova's special life, such as a liaison with a nun MM and an escape from the National Ombudsman prison - each way in their own way A strange sprint and a bold feat Giacomo Casanova was born in Venice in 1725. His parents, both actors wanted him to become a pastor, but their hope shattered when he was expelled from theological school due to 16 years of unethical cheating. Probably known as its erotic reputation, Casanova is a secretary, a Venetian army soldier, a missionary, an alchemist, a gambler, a violinist, a lottery, and a spy. He translated Homer's Iliad into Italian and, in collaboration with Da Ponte, provided a script for Mozart's Don Giovanni. He retired to the Count of Bohemia - the castle of Earl Waldstein - to write a memoir in 1785. "Trask wrote a completely modern version in English, but in terms of sensitivity it is very Italian, with superb suppression and exquisite he will convey the original enthusiasm and sensitivity." "These memoirs are essential reading ... they are not only very skilled tempters but also literatians with the best talent." "In 1966 Trask professionally translated this text into English, his English version is being read ... essential and easy to read ... Of course there are few books comparable to these memories, We can convey pure and energetic birth and youth's joy. " "Casanova is incomparable as reminding everyday conversation in the 18th century in Europe, he is traveling from the closet to the cabinet, to the coast, and to the palace, from monks to nobles, throughout his character 's mistress " "Chevalier de Seingalt is a very wonderful person and he has some wonderful qualities ... Is there a novelist or poet with a glory that is superior to Casanova to convey personal life? - Joy, spontaneity Sensitive, generous youth: middle aged ups and downs, when our character began to touch us, when forced to accept it, the story of a terrible blank casanova when things disappearing disappear In the 18th century, society from top to bottom, Europe from England to Russia, it is a novel than you in the 18th century. Life history (1734) Mss 23159 Scottish National Library. I will torture him after I give a letter asking an unknown doctor for advice about "illness". Here he reported at the age of 18, "It seems to open a new thinking ground to me", which called him "abandon all other happiness and business" and asked for a scholarship. Humanity theory: An attempt to introduce experimental reasoning into moral subjects (1739 - 40). Hume intends to ascertain whether "humanological theory" was successful, and if it succeeds it will complete it with a book on the theme of politics and criticism. But it has not been successful. As Hume himself said, "It died from the report, it has not reached such a difference, and even caused the fan's tweet," so that was not completed. So in my life / career history, I have had some success with show business ... my jokes talk about that style. I saw a lot on TV. It is kind of crazy ... I also spent hundreds of thousands of hours a day at the gym and lived in coffee and air diet ... so I look great. So what happened is that there is a moment ... In history, I have achieved a complete storm of success and enthusiasm ... Oh, I believe this is short ... but That happened. ..... I know that it happened Since I like history very much, I got my master's degree and became a researcher at Mykolaiv Regional History Museum. When I am a hobby, this is part of my life, history is repeated, and compatible with my work. One of the many duties of my profession is to tour tourists, so I made a lot of complete copies of Ukrainian Cossack equipment worn in the middle of the 17th century. People do not care about my work (especially children)

Thomas Malthus Thomas Robert Malthus wrote "Papers on Population Principle" 200 years ago. We believe that the world's population will grow faster than food. This will have disastrous results for general human welfare. At that time the world population was 250 million, now it has increased to about 6 billion people. Despite war, plague, famine, fashion, this still exists. Until recently, world food production has caught up with population growth. In the mid-1980s, world food supply was equally distributed among all members of society, with population of 7 billion people, each person can earn 11 pounds per week. Thomas Malthus, Thomas Robert Malthus, (1766 13 February, the UK Surigord near Roquery, died in 1834 December 29, St. Catherine, Bath, is best known in the summer his theory, the UK economy near the scholar and Seth is demographers, population growth tends to exceed the food supply, and without strict breeding restrictions, human improvement is not possible. this idea is often called the Malthusian. Malthus was born to a wealthy family. his father is skeptical David Hume of friends philosopher, Jean-Jacques Rousseau has been under the influence of his book Émile (1762) is about to educate the son it might be a source of liberal thought. young Malthus, until he enrolled in Cambridge, Jesus College in 1784, was educated in most of the time home. So he is the many subjects And research, was awarded the Latin and Greek awards, I graduated in 1788. Thomas Robert Malthus was born in February 1766 near Guildford, Surrey. His father succeeded at home and accepted Thomas' s education. Malthus then studied at the University of Cambridge and received a master's degree in 1791. In 1793 he became a researcher at Jesus University in Cambridge. In 1805, Malthus became a professor of history and political economics at the University of East India Company in Hailey Berry, Hertfordshire until his death. Malthus became a member of the Royal Society in 1819, two years later was appointed a member of the political and economic club, including David Ricardo and James Mill. In 1824, he was elected as one of the royal family members of the Royal Literature Society. Malthus also co-founded the London Statistics Association in 1834. Thomas Robert Malthus died on 23rd December 1834

As we know, cranes are one of the best inventions to be produced by people, as people always produce technical tools to promote their work. The present invention is the use of energy in machines. Prior to the present invention, manpowers and forces were used to lift very large and heavy material, but in this case technical development occurred and cranes were manufactured. "The first crane design was drawn by Roman architect Vitreous in the 5th century BC" (Wikipedia, 2013). Describing the crane, "The pulley of the crane is at the top. PT Hume Sakti Indonesia According to the head of the maintenance department of Yuslik, mobile cranes are cranes on the track, so they are more flexible to move directly to the work site without using the trailer frame. During work, the mobile crane extends the legs to keep the balance of the vehicle. Actual maintenance of a mobile crane is divided into two: maintenance routine and periodic maintenance. Yuslik explained that regular examination is intermittent treatment once a month. This type of inspection is usually done by the operator around the crane at the beginning of each shift looking for problems directly seen by the eyes. A movable independent crane system that provides a gantry structure designed to move or replace components and spare parts during maintenance operations and to install a wind turbine including an auxiliary gantry crane, The pod moves. Since the mobile independent crane system includes a lifting device as part of the crane system and the mobile independent crane system is fixed to the nacelle by the fixed unit and the mobile independent crane system is designed to be in the nacelle , It is designed to allow lifting of the crane system. It worked outside the pod. This device relates to a standalone mobile crane system temporarily used in a wind turbine generator (WTG), and more particularly to replace different components, namely rotor components, blades, generators, gear boxes Independent mobile crane system. Spare parts etc., under construction of wind power generator Modern turbines usually have small mounting cranes to lift maintenance tools and secondary parts. However, large heavy-duty parts such as generators, gearboxes and blades are rarely replaced, in which case heavy external cranes are required. If you have a road that is difficult to access the turbine, you can lift the container crane with the internal crane to increase the lift. Wind turbines are usually very cheap. They will generate at a price of 2 to 6 cents / kWh. This is one of the cheapest renewable energy sources. As the technology required for wind turbines continues to advance, prices will also decline. Furthermore, there is no competitive wind energy market as it does not cost money to get wind energy. The main cost of the wind turbine is the installation process. The average cost of installation is between $ 48,000 and $ 65,000

Criticize the opposite idea. Instead, the task is to do all of these in a powerful way. Dialogue is one of the important types of philosophical writing since the classical Greeks. In fact, Plato's dialogue (in most cases Socrates is the main interlocutor) is still the most complex representation of this type. The dialogue between Berkeley, Hume and other philosophers (and scientists like Galileo) still has considerable philosophical and literary value. Dialogue is one of the most difficult types of writing in philosophy, as it requires a clear understanding of philosophical position, good reasoning skills, psychological insight, and literary ability. Purpose dialogue is usually a dialogue between two or more people with different philosophical views. Dialogue enables dramatic presentation of pros and cons of philosophical standpoint in dialogue among people with these ideas. In Plato's conversation, they often try to show someone that they do not know what they think. This type of dialogue often ends with frustration and confusion. Other platonic conversations have opportunities to face and present a positive philosophical argument. For example, at Gorgias, Plato defended the fundamental moral argument that it is best not to oppose a sophisticated politician who completely rejected doctrine, but to suffer unfairly. Occasionally philosophers will write a dialogue during the abstraction. Conversation, dialogue between reason and truth - but this is far less than the dialogue between people His original philosophical point of view. The dialogue written by Plato later called Socrates, but Socrates in these conversations was not the same philosopher as Socrates of the initial dialogue; later Socrates is like Socrates in history It was not. It is a mouth piece of Plato's own philosophy. By carefully analyzing the text, you can distinguish and compare two Socratic characters. Early Dialogue of Socrates - Socrates E 'adopted a fairly concrete philosophical approach to finding moral truth by examining the definition of moral terms of interpreters. Ironically, as he has no knowledge of himself, Socrates brings his talkie into a state of helplessness, he realizes that he does not know what he thought he knew before. state

When Socrates was 60 years old, Plato, who was only twenty years old, came to him as a student. When Plato was 60 years old, Aristotle of 17 years appeared and joined the teacher 's "Friends" group. And members of the university called themselves. Aristotle is a young man who was born and raised moderately, whose father served as a doctor of King Macedonia Philippe. Strong personality, sharp wisdom, obvious honesty, but personal ambition. For 20 years in Athens, Aristotle was a college student. Author: Gerard · Cretian Plato and Aristotle Many modern experts believe Plato was the first true political philosophy, Aristotle is the first political scholar. They are the foundation of Socrates's great thinker and great Western philosopher. Plato and Aristotle each have ideas on how to improve their society during their existence. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze their different theories with this heavy metaphysical speculation. In conclusion, Hume wishes to limit metaphysical speculation to one field and is not so inclined to such a fate. While Aristotle desires the meaning beyond the faith of God in connection with the philosophical thinking of Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, or Stoic, science with theology at the apex of speculative science is called natural philosophy ( Biology etc). , Mathematics and theology. Likewise, Stoic Chrysippus claims that theology is the realization or aim of philosophy. For Aristotle and other philosophers, theology means that only the knowledge gained can discern what constitutes the right life. In the absence of cognitive inconsistencies, knowledge of the right life is considered to mean sticking to the right life.

Recent research shows that humility is related to many forms of social behavior. Some people misunderstand that humility is low self-esteem or low self-esteem, but the correct concept of this virtue is both self-esteem and other related factors. A modest man maintains her achievement, talent, and talent from a proper perspective. She has self-awareness and is aware of the limits as a person and the limits of ourselves. But humble people also face other people, respect the happiness of other people and can "forget themselves" when appropriate. Interestingly, empirical research on humility shows that this property is very worthwhile. Modesty is related to better academic performance, grades and leadership. Modest people have a better social relationship and avoid deception in their social interactions, they have a tendency to forgive, appreciate, and cooperative. A recent series of studies also shows that humility is a generous and consistent predictor. Some philosophers are not impressed by humility in history. Aristotle excluded it from his virtue catalog, and both David Hume and Friedrich Nietzsche criticized this trait. "Single, fast, repenting, humiliation, self-denial, humility, silence, loneliness, and the virtues of all monks. They have reasons to be rejected by conscious people everywhere, but they have a purpose Since wealth does not make him a member of a more valuable society, the entrepreneurial qualification of the company is not not qualified for the power to improve his own environment, but beyond all these ideal goals Understand that in your mind, cover your fancies and lose your mood, so we just move them to the opposite column and put them in the abuse directory "2 But empirical evidence seems to indicate that criticism of this humility is wrong. Since humility is a distinguishing feature of the successful organization of the CEO, we can promote the wealth of the world. The relationship between humility and generosity suggests that it makes people a more valuable member of society. Others believe humble individuals are well tuned and kind. Empirical evidence of modest value seems to suggest that Hume rejected it is a mistake. Modesty is a characteristic that is worth cultivating, given the appropriateness of our finite and error prone people, its personal prosperity and its value for social welfare. 1 Julie Exline and Peter Hill, "Humble: Coherent, powerful and generous prediction", Journal of Positive Psychology (May 2012): 208-218. This article contains references to other empirical studies related to the humility discussed above. "I began with modesty, acted humbly, acted humbly, humility acts for clarity, humility opens my mind and brings a generous mind. Everyone is my teacher, Humility grows up with wisdom, humility leads me, begins with humility, acts humbly and ends with humility.What are you planning to do for your life, And if you have a ten-year plan on how to get there, you should ask: why can not you do this in 6 months? Sometimes you follow a complex 10 year trajectory But at least one question is that this is the story or reality you said to yourself. Humility is often regarded as virtue. However, what we often see is not "humility" but "false humility". Here I argue that humility is one of the least pursued or even unpraised attributes. Instead, the task is to identify some other attributes to make others as discreet. As there are additional advantages, these other attributes are more sustainable and achievable, and there are many other advantages. I will present two such attributes when pursuing a conservative effect as a byproduct. Just as entrepreneurs do not pursue assets but create assets as a by-product of value creation Consider the spiritual value of the center, humility, and how it is expressed in real actions. Modesty has critics and contempt, but there is no doubt that true humility is a difficult spiritual achievement. If the English writer and philosopher

To send this article to Kindle, be sure to add no-reply@cambridge.org to [Authorized individual] under [Personal document settings] on the Amazon content [Manage content and devices] page please. Document Mailing List "Next, please enter the" Name "section of the Kindle 's e - mail address below. Learn more about sending to Kindle. Details on sending to Kindle You can choose to submit to variants of @ free.kindle.com or @ kindle.com. E-mail "@ free.kindle.com" is free, but you can send it to the device only when you are connected to Wi-Fi. Even if you are not connected to Wi-Fi, you can send "@ kindle.com" e-mail, but pay attention to service charges. Whether capitalism is compatible with morality is a long-standing controversy. We adopt Adam Smith's ethical approach to virtue and we will examine how market competition affects the most relevant virtues of modern business society. Until to a certain extent, competition nurtures and supports virtues such as prudence, moderateism, civilization, diligence, and honesty. There are mechanisms, however, that could have a detrimental effect on the institutions and incentives required for sustaining even those most commercially desirable virtues. Generally, competitive market will be intense if competitive market is good. However, in the long run, the policy of intensifying competition ignores the fostering and support of bourgeois-like virtues and may weaken the continued prosperity of modern business society. Cautious, temperate, courteous, diligent and honest bourgeois virtues we are thinking here are "ethical business" literature (identified by Albert Hirschman and Adam Smith, David Hume and Montesquieu) is more than mere The needs of the business community chosen to acknowledge that it is compatible is encouraged. Of course, the whole system of Smith, when he understood, adapted to the needs of the business world. Therefore, lack and corruption should be concerned (as Smith lacks courage), but carefully conclude how the consequences of moral prosperity in the commercial society will affect one or all of them There is no doubt. There is much debate as to whether so-called "moral Adams miss" is compatible with "economic Adams miss". Some scholars believe there is a difference between his argument about morality and virtue and his spontaneous capitalist thinking. Interest; German scholars have created this "Das Adam Smith problem". Other scholars regard this statement as a mere misunderstanding. Richard Zeyss believes that this problem has been misunderstood. "The concept of Smith's moral judgment is not due only to sympathy ... There are at least three main factors in the" virtue "of Smith's male. Kindness prudence is a feature of selfish behavior and is particularly useful in economic pursuit and justice explains "negative virtue" that conforms to public law designed to suppress excessive self-interest To do.

Human Rights and John Rawls People's Law Legislation: Which political and judicial foundation can prove the transition from the West to the general in particular? John Rawls tried to answer this question in his article "People's Law" and proposed a contract or agreement. The free and democratic society should reach the first agreement on several political and social issues such as human rights. Then this agreement can be extended to the society that is necessary to satisfy peace with an organizational legal system that admits freedom and democracy but an organized hierarchical society, or to some extent freedom - politics and religion John Rawls introduced the concept of human rights politics in his book "People's Law" (Rolls 1999). The basic idea is to determine what the human rights are and what they need by determining the main role that human rights fulfills in a particular political field. In the People's Law, this field is international relations (followed by the politics of the country). An attempt by Rawls to rectify international law and politics in today's international system will help Rawls explain how to focus on how human rights works in this system. Human rights in interpersonal relationship does not belong to this field John Rawls is a 20th century American philosopher specializing in the fields of ethics, political philosophy, and law philosophy. Rawls is considered by many as the most important political philosopher of the 20th century and his symbolic "justice" is trying to combine many competitive political theories that are thought to be incompatible It is praised for what he did. In the nineteenth century, political philosophy divided Karl Marx's radical equalityism and concept of individual freedom and freedom acknowledged by John Stuart Mill. Rolls rejected Marx's communism and Mill's utilitarianism, returned to the early modern social contract model, and was influenced by Rock, Rousseau, Hume, and Kant and formed his own theoretical version . Rawls' philosophy has been widely praised, but it produced two books contrary to justice theory.

Voltaire said, "Metaphysical considerations include the nature of possibilities and necessities, I will violate my basic assumption that God chose the best from all possible worlds" I said. In Candido, the character in the book Pangloth said ... "Everything is the best, if there is a volcano in Lisbon, there is nothing else there, since things can not exist there, there is none The place is good for everything "(Voltaire 30). Through Pangloss, he had experienced so much pain (or evil) that he believed that God's thought produced all these pain for 'b'. The problem of evil in philosophy What is the classic "evil problem" ("three difficulties") in the Western philosophy / theological tradition? The problem of evil is how to harmonize the existence of evil with omnipotence, omniscience, and the presence of the Almighty God. Greek philosopher Epicuras detailed this trilemma in ancient times and summarized it in modern David Hume. Epicuras advocates a trilemma to counter the concept of almighty Theodicy is a specific issue of theology and philosophy trying to solve the problem that arises when trying to harmonize the existence of evil observed in the world with the existence of perfectly good God (or almighty, almighty) It is department. "Almighty" "Theodicy" also refers to any attempt to solve this problem. In recent years, a new approach has emerged and takes a different approach. Instead of trying to eliminate disturbing contradiction, accepting the contradiction between evil reality and omnipotent and gentle god, thinking as a way to actually exclude evil, or to better understand the essence of God, or both I can. The problem of evil has two branches. Evil logic problem (LPOE) seeks to prove that the existence of evil contradicts the existence of omnipotence and omnipotent existence. The evidence evidence question (EPOE) tries to prove that the existence of an amount or kind of evil contradicts the existence of somewhat effective and benevolent entity. Of course, not all Gods are considered omnipotent, omnipotent, or either. Many gods are morally defective, positive evil, or simply indifferent, and not omnipotent. The evil logical matter does not apply to these gods, but evidence of evil evidence still holds true. This is consistent with the idea of ​​evil. That is, there are defective evil, irrelevant, or totipotent entities that are compatible with reality and the existence of omnipotent and omnipotent entities is not

Definition of philosophy Personal or moral philosophy is how to live or how to act. People who claim that the philosophy of our life is "lifetime", "at horn", or some cliches are often heard. Though the definitions are correct, these people use the phrase "philosophy", but the words closely related to our past, present and future great thinkers are different. The philosophy for people pursuing knowledge, meaning of life, and the truth of everything means bigger and less concise. This is a more extreme definition of philosophy. This definition begins with the philosophy of the turn of the century. Resistance to the metaphysical philosophy system is rising. The metaphysical system of philosophy will explain everything from the perspective of a wonderful idea such as "thinking" and "spirit". This reaction is primarily contrary to idealistic philosophy, which is a highly developed metaphysical philosophy. Details about this are displayed in the fifth definition. Language analysis emphasizes rejection of metaphysics and accepts simple but useful scientific verification of modern standards. Their central argument is that only the logical truths and empirically verified descriptions make sense. In this case, what does scientific verification mean? This can be said to be the case if you can verify or copy experiments. We now turn to the definition of some philosophy. These are historical methods, the philosophy of criticism, philosophy of language analysis, philosophy of change planning, a series of questions and answers to philosophy, and philosophy of world view. In the process, we analyze the definition and draw some conclusions about this analysis. Remember our question: What is philosophy? According to this method, philosophy is actually a study of a historical person who is regarded as a philosopher. Everyone is regarded as a philosopher, such as Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Augustine, Thales, Filo, Protino, Aquinas, Kant, Eligina, Hume, Marx, Hegel, Russell, Whit Genstein. As many of their views are quite diverse, what happens together? One answer lies in their common problems and concerns.

Antoine de Saint-Exupéry, one of the most outstanding philosophers of the last century, wrote in his special novel "Little Prince" in 1943. 'As you finish washing and dressing every morning, you need to lean against your planet. "In other words, Little Prince has free natural freedom, but he still needs to be responsible for maintaining harmony with habitat, beyond personal responsibility. I believe that the government will take action to achieve equal opportunities and equality for all people. The government is responsible for alleviating social illnesses and protecting civic freedom, individuals and human rights. I think the role of the government should be to ensure that nobody needs it. Liberal policy emphasizes the need for the government to solve problems. Women have the right to decide what will happen to their bodies. Because the fetus is not a human life, it does not have another personal right. The government should abort the taxpayers for women who can not pay tax. Deciding on abortion is a personal choice for women who are fit for their body and the government must keep this right. Women have the right to receive affordable, safe and legal abortion, including several abortions. One of the important functions of the government is to define and distribute property rights. The courts and government agencies will help to define and protect these rights. The triad of property law, contract law and tort law provides a fundamental set of legal rules enabling protection from ownership, voluntary transfer, and involuntary transactions. The explanation of humanity of David Hume defines three basic rules of nature: "stability of possession, relocation of consent, and fulfillment of promises" (17).

After the king's death, Congress opened England - but in Cromwell's opinion this system did not work effectively. He saw England people suffering, he became a federal guardian. Despite the difference with Congress, Cromwell brought peace and prosperity to the UK. This is one of the greatest benefits for his country. He won even the crown in 1657, but he refused. As mentioned above, the control of Cromwell in the UK is heavily influenced by his religious beliefs, and many of his reforms relate to religion. The purpose of this article is to answer the long-awaited question about one of the most controversial people in British history. Is Oliver Cromwell a hero or a villain? The answer is difficult to clarify, even for scholars who have different opinions and have been discussing him for centuries. Cromwell has been seen as a demon, fanatics, hero, and the incarnation of God (1999, BBC News). For historians like Thomas Carlyle and Samuel Rosengardner, Oliver Cromwell is a hero of freedom, for others like David Hume and Christopher Hill he is a murder dictator. But the vision which controversial this figure is still in our 10 years. In 2002, the BBC conducted a poll in the UK and was elected as one of the top ten British in history. But who is right? What is the reasonable evaluation of today's Cromwell? Please consider all these important points to make a reasonable view of this controversial diagram Oliver Cromwell was originally elected to organize a new model army senator. It was for Cromwell that Roundheads beat Cavilers. After Congress won the war, the federation was established. Oliver Cromwell is an important part of the Commonwealth through the management of his military resources. Charles II was the first king after the 'decade of the king'. With his excellent wit and charm, he won the support of British people. He crossed the courtroom like Louis XIV. Charles also converted the British Church to Britain, but he accepted other Protestant groups. Unlike his father, Charles II accepted petition for justice, but they all believed in the power of absolute monarchy. Charles II also treated Congress as his father did. In January 1649, Charles I was executed and his death sentence was signed by Oliver Cromwell. Cromwell became the new ruler of England and under his rule he achieved several controversial outcomes. In this article, I will evaluate various actions using modern perspectives, quotes, and other materials as to whether these actions make him a hero or a bad guy. One of Cromwell 's main assets is the new model army he used to defeat the king' s army. Cromwell did good and evil as a military leader and had different opinions on whether he and his army as a whole were heroes or evils. Several historians believe that the new model forces are disciplined and efficient with outstanding founders and military leaders. Unlike the king's army, it has only a powerful generals, not a great aristocrat. This may be the reason for its success, but there are people who say that it also has the hands of God.

Given sociology, Durkheim is a very influential name. Durkheim's mission is to develop sociology, so you can define it and use it as a way to use sociology. Durchem is focusing mainly on his career when it is considered to be a past thing such as sharing religious views and ethnic backgrounds because in society the society has its integrity and rationality in modern society How to maintain. Regarding social realism of Durkheim, he is interested in growing individualism in society. An important, often misunderstood element of Durkheim's sociological approach can be found in the so-called Durkheim social realism. Alternatively, society is an objective and realistic entity which exists autonomously independently. This view is a concentrated picture of a specific individual. Social facts are seen as things through his prescription. In this realistic position, there are two important claims. First, Durkheim advocated ontological claims about the unique reality of social facts. Second, Durkheim argues that the epistemological and methodological claims that social facts should be viewed as reality objects that exist outside the minds of researchers and can be determined by the ability to do compulsive behavior I advocated. Therefore, Durkheim believes that there is a special existential nature in social facts, and when sociologists handle them in a proper and scientific way, they can discover and analyze them. In addition to the positivism of CONT, the second influence on Durkheim's view on society is an epistemological viewpoint called social realism. He never exposed it explicitly, but using a realistic view to prove the existence of social reality outside the individual, these facts exist in the form of social and objective relations showed that. As a scientific epistemology, realism can be defined as a viewpoint of placing external social reality in the external world, and these reality are independent of their individual perception and their central starting point I will use it as. This viewpoint is against other major philosophical views such as empiricism and positivism. Experians like David Hume believe that the reality of the outside world is a product of human perception. Context's positivism has advanced one step further, arguing that scientific law can be inferred from empirical observations.

Elvis Aaron Presley was born in Vernon and Gladys Presley of Misson's Tupelo on January 8, 1935. Presley was poor then, Vernon attempted a variety of work to support his family. He often passed away and Elvis built close relationships with his mother. She lost another son at birth and was able to make other children. She pinned everything I had hoped for my surviving son so that I would not be disappointed. In 1948, my family moved to Memphis, where Elvis Presley's musical talent began to bloom. Elvis Presley was born on Gladys Love Presley (née Smith) in Tupelo, Michigan on January 8, 1935, and his father, Vernon Elvis Presley, has created a shotgun room for two rooms. Jesse Gallon Presley, his identical twin brother, was sent 35 minutes before his death. Presley has a close relationship with his parents and has a particularly close relationship with his mother. The family attended the church of God's assembly where he found his first musical inspiration. On his mother's side, Presley's ancestors were Scottish Irish and French Norman. Gladys and other families clearly believe that her great-grandmother morning pigeon is Cherokee; the biography of Elaine Dundy supports this idea, but at least one pedigree researcher in many ways I asked a question. Vernon's ancestry was German or Scottish. Gladys is regarded as a family member from relatives and friends. Elvis Aaron Presley was born on January 8, 1935 in East Tupelo, Michigan, born in Née Gladys Love Smith and Vernon Elvis Presley. He has stubborn twin brothers. In 1948, Elvis and her parents moved to Memphis, Tennessee, where he went to Hume High School. In 1953, he took part in a high-level dance with the present girls Regis Wilson. After graduating from Memphis High School, Elvis served Royal Electric film guide and truck driver. He began singing "The Hillbilly Cat" locally, then contracted with a local record company and signed with RCA in 1955.

The problem of evil was a problem that philosophers always tried to answer for centuries. That is simply why evil exists in our world if God exists and is complete and almighty. Two great philosophers, Gottfried Leibniz and Nicolas Malebranche, tried to answer this question with their own solution. They all answered the same questions, but their views were very different. Specifically, we oppose whether the world is the best world created by God. The problem of evil in philosophy What is the classic "evil problem" ("three difficulties") in the Western philosophy / theological tradition? The problem of evil is how to harmonize the existence of evil with omnipotence, omniscience, and the presence of the Almighty God. Greek philosopher Epicuras detailed this trilemma in ancient times and summarized it in modern David Hume. Epicuras advocates a trilemma to counter the concept of almighty The problem of evil has two branches. Evil logic problem (LPOE) seeks to prove that the existence of evil contradicts the existence of omnipotence and omnipotent existence. The evidence evidence question (EPOE) tries to prove that the existence of an amount or kind of evil contradicts the existence of somewhat effective and benevolent entity. Of course, not all Gods are considered omnipotent, omnipotent, or either. Many gods are morally defective, positive evil, or simply indifferent, and not omnipotent. The evil logical matter does not apply to these gods, but evidence of evil evidence still holds true. This is consistent with the idea of ​​evil. That is, there are defective evil, irrelevant, or totipotent entities that are compatible with reality and the existence of omnipotent and omnipotent entities is not

Paying the poor talent of Elvis Presley Bill Bill Elvis Presley is the rock king, an American pop culture icon that fascinates viewers with its powerful voice and superb sensory sensation. In the 1950s, Elvis devoted himself to singing and making music. However, in the 1960s, he spent time making movies and appearing in the movies. As many critics have argued, Elvis showed poor performance in his film, often showing indifference and dull expression. But through the entertainment media, Elvis can motivate the young generation to "take action" from his "bad behavior" in American society. Elvis Aaron Presley was born in Vernon and Gladys Presley of Misson's Tupelo on January 8, 1935. Presley was poor then, Vernon attempted a variety of work to support his family. He often passed away and Elvis built close relationships with his mother. She lost another son at birth and was able to make other children. She pinned everything I had hoped for my surviving son so that I would not be disappointed. In 1948, my family moved to Memphis, where Elvis Presley's musical talent began to bloom. Young Elvis showed his natural music talent at a very young age and he pursued music at a young age. At the age of 19 he was signed by Sun Records and was signed by the RCA record at the age of 21 in 1955. He soon broke through the national chart at his first RCA single "Heartbreak Hotel" (1956). Then he followed the very successful single "Hound" / "Do not be cruel" (1956) and "All Shook Up" (1957). Elvis Presley was born in Tupelo, Mississippi, USA on January 8, 1935. He is an American actor and singer. He is also known as the most important cultural symbol of the 20th century. Elvis Presley began his musical career in 1954. Presley's first RCA single "Heartbreak Hotel" was released in January 1956. Elvis Presley 's first movie was "Love Me Tender" in 1956. His most popular is "The King of Rocks". Read Elvis Presley quotes The story of Elvis Presley's wonderful life started on January 8, 1935. Elvis · Aaron · Presley was born in Vernon and Gladys · Presley in Miss Tupper. Luo's 2 bedroom house. His twin brother, Jess Galleon, who died grew up from Elvis as a child. He and his parents moved to Memphis, Tennessee in 1948, and in 1953 Elvis graduated there from Hume 's High School. In 1954, Elvis started his career in Memphis's legendary San Record brand. At the end of 1955, his recording contract was sold to RCA Victor. By 1956, he was an international sensation. That sound and style uniquely combines his diverse musical influences, blurred and challenged the social and ethnic barriers of that era, and created a new era of American music and pop culture.

Flannario Connor's short story "Good people are hard to find" (367-377) conveys the view that freedom often leads to ugly truths due to the environment. However, everyone has the freedom to choose; sometimes, this option leads them to an unpleasant reality. Claire Katz explains that O'Connor uses violence "can ... her role ... return to her so-called" reality ". This will allow the use of satire to express simple choices that can be done from Aokang to be seen in extreme situations. Free choice While social freedom refers to two actors and their actions, freedom of choice represents the relationship between an actor and a series of alternative potential behaviors. "A has free choice of x or z" means that A is more likely to perform x or z, or that both x and z are open. Conversely, if A is either impossible or unnecessary, A has no freedom to choose x. In this sense, Hume defines freedom as "ability to act according to decision of decision or power not to act". The freedom of choice is neither a necessary condition of social freedom nor a sufficient condition. If A can not do x, he will only do this if his incompetence is caused by some other actor B. Otherwise, even if he does not have the freedom of choice for x, A can free x. Let's return to the average Americans and clarify the relationship between the freedom of choice and the dilemma. He is doing poor 'freedom of choice'. But let's see his choice. He can buy various medical plans - but they do not cover much, and they are all deadly. He can apply for a million jobs - but none of them can provide him with a reasonable retirement level, leisure, trust, income, stability, opportunity, and maneuverability . He can choose hundreds from thousands of cable channels - but they are not close to pornography about fat man, ancient aliens, conspiracy theory, quarrel experts. TV programs and BBC documentaries etc. He has the choice - this is true. But his choice adds to the dilemma because they are all bad: a decision between two or more wrong choices What is missing from the idea of ​​choosing freedom? I failed intuitively. It left a bad taste on educated perosn's tongue. Why is this? So, do you remember that I started writing this article? Medical bankruptcy and feed your child? This is a dilemma - a decision between a series of bad choices. The problem of choosing freedom is that it is too easy to be a problem. Let's return to the average Americans and clarify the relationship between the freedom of choice and the dilemma. He is doing poor 'freedom of choice'. But let's see his choice. He can buy various medical plans - but they do not cover much, and they are all deadly. He can apply for a million jobs - but none of them can provide him with a reasonable retirement level, leisure, trust, income, stability, opportunity, maneuverability

Natural inevitability, objective opportunity, and causal force summary: Whether the relationship between an attribute of one and its associated tendency reacts in some way and is necessary to trigger this trend and subsequent effects. Harré and Madden said they were analyzing the power of causality, but their argument was not convincing. Humees like Simon Blackburn denied this. I criticized Hume's position and re-discussed the necessity. As a recognized Hume, he did not admit it, but I noticed that necessity of David Lewis' causality was necessary for their analysis. The causal relationship as a concept of nature necessity is focused only on the existence of things and is different from causality as a concept of freedom. Because it is determinable in time, therefore it is an appearance rather than a causal relationship as the object itself. Well, when judging the existence of things and judging things in time (this is the most common way of expressing things), the necessity of causality must not be related to freedom; to the contrary, Are inconsistent with each other. Because from the beginning each event, and all actions occurring at a particular moment, need to be executed under previous conditions. Well, past times are no longer suitable for me, so all the actions I take must be done by deciding why it is not suitable for me. (CPrR 5: 94-95, underlined) Rational human condition 3, deep freedom and reality people: metaphysical studies, section 4.5 - three discussions on local incompatibility of the natural mechanism According to the natural law of causality, the necessity of a timely event can be called a natural mechanism. Here we only pay attention to the necessity of connection of events in time series. The subject of development is the material of the automaton with Leibniz Spiritalale if the machine is moved by substance or driven by expression and if the freedom of our will is not the latter ... then it ends with that When it rolls up, it also completes its own movements. (Proverbs 5:97, underlined) Reasonable human condition 3, deep freedom and true personality: metaphysical studies, section 2.3 - Kant's anti-mechanism, cant's anti-mechanism, vitalism, emergence "... (Causal relationship) Causal law ... A country that observes the law in nature, there is nothing arbitrary. Everything is necessary so that all phenomena occur frequently. Without the need, it is impossible to accumulate experience ... its success in the field of theoretical physics provides the most appropriate confirmation of common law From the Britannica encyclopedia, astrology forecasts ordinary events It is based on the assumption that celestial bodies - especially planets and stars - are considered to be combined or arranged in some way (called the constellation.) The theoretical basis of this hypothesis is that, Historically it exists in Hellenistic philosophy and fundamentally distinguishes astrology and celestial bodies ("Omen"), first classified and cataloged in ancient Mesopotamia.

John Rock John Rock interprets the state of nature as an equality state that anyone can move freely without having power to anyone else. However, he pointed out that this freedom does not mean abusing other people's permission, but also natural laws even in the natural state. Everyone in the state of nature has the power to enforce the universal law of nature. The analysis of Locke's natural state is correct; Locke's theory contains many assumptions. Indeed, as it is not the background of interpretation of secularists, I have suspicions about rock. On the contrary, I think of Lock-shaped Hobbes, Kant, Hume, Bentham, Mill, and a resultisticism distorting contemporary reasoning - a lack of intentional mastery, practical reasons and will, and a way for human freedom to work . And the prosperity of mankind. These drawbacks can be attributed primarily to the metaphysics of locks that locate people's identity in consciousness. As to the concept of Locke's will, Locke pointed out that "the will of truth only represents power or ability to choose or choose." Given these views as a lack of self-control over freedom, these are powerful combinations. Dualism, autonomy, even positivism Hobbes, Rock John Rock and Thomas Hobbes are famous political theorists of other eras. Hobbes who was born 40 years before the birth of rock has a totally different view from rock and both will do more research through this article. Many theories were different in the 16th century, but the theory of Hobbes and Rock became closer. Because the rise of the state and the decline of the feudal system caused problems of authority. - Why John Rock was the best philosopher ever in history John Rock was a British philosopher and doctor who lived between 29 August 1632 and 28 October 1704. He is one of the most outstanding enlightenment thinkers, and he explains many ideas that will affect humanity. Live in society today. He emphasizes human freedom and limits the authority of the government, so he is widely known as the father of classical liberalism (18).

The decline of the Roman Empire was the subject of intense academic research. However, the cause of the decrease is still a subject of intense debate. The classic book on collapse was a massive text entitled "Decline and Decline of the Roman Empire" written by the British historian Edward Gibbon in 1776. More than 200 theories have been proposed to explain this declining trend. There are many speculative fields about the decline of the Roman Empire, but at least three points seems to be open to discussion. Edward Gibbon's work "The Decline and Collapse of the Roman Empire" is a well-known and detailed analysis of the decline of Roman civilization. The tenant said in 1453 when Constantinople became Ottoman Turkish there was the last scene of the collapse of Rome. For gibbons, "The decline of Rome is an unavoidable influence of infinitely large nature, prosperity matures the principle of decline, the cause of destruction increases with the degree of conquest, and once accidents and accidents are huge The story of the ruins that excludes artificial support is straightforward and it should be surprising that it has existed for such a long time not to ask why the Roman Empire was destroyed. " When Edward Gibbon tried to answer this question about the Roman Empire with the decline of his shocking 18th century Roman Empire, he used a strict humanism. For gibbon monkeys (supporters of stereotypes of what Britain means "Lumanis") a fallen or stupid emperor may cause a sports event to collapse the entire building. However, recent historical academic research has raised questions about the stereotypes of gibbons, "good" and "bad" emperor. Especially in the latter half of the 20th century, a new archaeological study questioned the hypothesis that Rome was a kind of useful megaliths relying solely on the emperor, exploring complex elite accommodations maintaining the development of the empire I started casting. Recently, studies on Alpine Iscore and many other non-textual materials have revealed the deeper reasons for empire success and collapse (faster). Decline and decline of EDWARD GIBBON and 'ROMAN EMPIRE'. In the latter part of the 18th century not only was the greatest biography of all the biographies created, but also the same level of history, the decline and decline of the Roman Empire was created. Through the collection of extensive materials and laborious research, and through the reproduction of past lives, contextual and lively characters, modern history has little scientific precision anywhere before the Gibbon since the classical era We aim to achieve. Most of medieval chronicles reporters, chronograph, short mechanical recorder of external events, and few philosophical historians of the 16th and 17th centuries did not reach the first level. Two Scottish historians, his early generations, philosopher David Hume and pastor William Robertson made several preparations for this arm's arms, but their scientific responsibility is It was minimal.

When Stewart let go of his pride for himself and his companion, he encountered an ethical dilemma. At O'Donnell Camp, we learn Japanese as "we understand them and they understand us" (Stewart, 96-97). One day on business, "a guard sat seated next to us" sat down (Stewart, 101). A security guard in the forest showed pictures of his wife and daughter (Stewart, 101). "I praised them, we talked to him to make it impossible to accompany the Japanese for a while" (Stewart, 101). What is relevant to these ethical arguments, whether as an "old man" from the viewpoint of virtue or personality vice, whether it is mainly "responsible" or "modern person" in natural laws, moral It is a dilemma of understanding of life. . Legislative thinkers like Hobbes have many thoughts about virtue, but ethical writers of the 17th and 18th centuries mainly support the rule of law or the rule of law, giving priority to natural laws or principles Did. It is an obligation. The main exception here is the school of morality. It insists on an analysis of moral life like the moral life of Greeks and Hellenistic thinkers in regard to fixed characteristics of personality. Hume clearly supports ethical ethics along the "ancient" line. But he insisted on fulfilling the rules of obligation in the field he called artificial virtue. Aristotle, an ancient Greek philosopher, called a certain moral sense as virtue. Virtue expresses moral excellence, sometimes called good personality. Aristotle pointed out that wisdom has special wisdom as well. Wisdom is different from moral virtue. However, according to Aristotle, in terms of moral value too much or too few problems are not a problem. He says to us that moral virtue represents the midpoint between excessive vice and bad habits. For example, courage is virtue. But those who have too much courage (excessive vice) are pretty dry. A brave man (lack of surrogacy) is a coward. People who fight at the midpoint between the two extremes show good character. They are showing the right virtue in every situation. This is called golden meaning. The doctrine of virtue doctrine in virtue ethics is between two bad habits. For example, courage is virtue, which exists between recklessness and timidity. Honor is virtue, but going too far is self-critical and humiliating. Psychological guidelines state that A and B are the same person only if A and B are strongly psychologically related. Psychological Relationship Body Standard pointed out

These readings include the famous chapter of Rock "Human Understanding Chapter" and Chapter 4. In chapter 3 we discuss the impossibility of having innate practice principles. It is important to distinguish this chapter from the previous chapter and the second chapter discusses that the previous chapter can not have congenital speculative principles. This is the reason for speculation. Speculative rationality is theoretical and reliable, there is no reliance on real life. It gives universal truth and logic to an individual's life. The paper on human understanding is Jon Rock's job based on human knowledge and understanding. It first appeared in 1689 (although the date was 1690), it was printed under the heading "Papers on human understanding". He expressed his birth mind as a blank state (he did not use actual words, but tabla lasa) and then filled it with experience. This article is one of the main sources of empiricism in contemporary philosophy and it affects many enlightenment philosophers such as David Hume and George Berkeley. John Rock's Human Understanding Papers In John Rock's "Papers on Human Understanding" he distinguishes between the various ideas that we can think of as object perception. Locke divides these concepts into primary and secondary quality. No matter what criticism is necessary for this distinction, perceptions will happen by chance. - Both John Rock and Thomas Hobbes believe that men are essentially equal, but their personal view on equality suggests a fundamentally different approach to proper citizenship I guided you to do. Locke believes that the correct form of civilian government should pay attention to the common interests of people and protect citizens' rights to life, health, freedom, and personal property. Locke's "Papers on Human Understanding" (1689) outlines human knowledge, identity, and self theory. To Locke, knowledge is not to discover things born out of the individual or to the outside but to discover only "facts" that accumulate from sensory experiences. In order to discover the truth beyond the basic field of experience, Locke proposed a method based on rigorous experimental scientific method. "Two Governments" (1690) provided a political theory that rock developed and completed at Shaftesbury in that year. Rock refused to accept the sacred rights of the king and said that society formed the government through mutual (and future generations, silent) agreements. Thus, when the king loses consent of control, society may remove him - this method is almost verbatim in the Thomas Jefferson's 1776 Declaration of Independence.

Antoine de Saint-Exupéry, one of the most outstanding philosophers of the last century, wrote in his special novel "Little Prince" in 1943. 'As you finish washing and dressing every morning, you need to lean against your planet. "In other words, Little Prince has free natural freedom, but he still needs to be responsible for maintaining harmony with habitat, beyond personal responsibility. I believe that the government will take action to achieve equal opportunities and equality for all people. The government is responsible for alleviating social illnesses and protecting civic freedom, individuals and human rights. I think the role of the government should be to ensure that nobody needs it. Liberal policy emphasizes the need for the government to solve problems. Women have the right to decide what will happen to their bodies. Because the fetus is not a human life, it does not have another personal right. The government should abort the taxpayers for women who can not pay tax. Deciding on abortion is a personal choice for women who are fit for their body and the government must keep this right. Women have the right to receive affordable, safe and legal abortion, including several abortions. One of the important functions of the government is to define and distribute property rights. The courts and government agencies will help to define and protect these rights. The triad of property law, contract law and tort law provides a fundamental set of legal rules enabling protection from ownership, voluntary transfer, and involuntary transactions. The explanation of humanity of David Hume defines three basic rules of nature: "stability of possession, relocation of consent, and fulfillment of promises" (17).

Whether humans really have free will or whether their lives are completely decided is decided. This free will problem continues to be a place of philosophical debate forever. Many great philosophers tried to answer this question, but none of them answered as much as Immanuel Kant. He put the foundation of his argument in the foreword of the future metaphysics. In response to David Hume 's skepticism, Kant wrote this method, so Kant made a more resolute attempt to metaphysics. The philosophy of the great German philosopher Immanuel Kant in the late 1700s was the foundation of almost all philosophical development since then. Kant's philosophy is called Critical Philosophy or Transcendental Philosophy. Hume's skeptical philosophy spurred Kant's attempt to achieve a combination of rationalism and empiricism. In his "critique of pure reason" (1781), Kant tried to provide a critical explanation of the power and limitations of human reasons to decide what is known and what is not known I will. Kant's conclusion is that reasoning only provides knowledge about what we see and not about things themselves. Kant believes that not only the facts of the facts presented by the senses but also the mind plays an active role in understanding. Ideas do this through basic categories or understanding These categories or forms of understanding are independent of experience. Emmanuel Kant (1724-1804) German philosopher. Kant's "critique of pure reason" tries to combine reason from experiences between reason and empiricism to experience and to remove philosophy. Kant's philosophy affects future German idealists and philosophers such as Shelling and Schopenhauer. Thomas Paine (1737-1809) British and American writers and political activists. He is an avid supporter of American independence. Pain wrote many articles to support Republican ideals. This had a major impact on the revolution in America and France. The noteworthy works are as follows. Human rights (1791) Philosophy of the 1800s. Kant's philosophy stimulated various ideologies such as G. W. F. Hegel and Karl Marx in Germany during the 1800's. Hegel has developed a theory of historical change called the dialectic. There, the conflicting conflict led to the creation of a new unity, and it led to the opposite. Hegel 's theory was transformed into dialectical materialism by Marx. Marx believes that only material things are genuine. He said that all ideas are based on the economy. He believes that dialectics of conflict between capitalists and industrial workers will lead to the establishment of communism, he calls it social and political systems.

Contribution of science to the promotion of illness in the 19th century Continued development of scientific knowledge is the main factor driving disease. The first step in promoting disease is to discover microorganisms. Returning to the late 1600s, a Dutch watchmaker called Anthony van Leeuwenhoek made the first microscope. His microscope is not so clear, the clarity of the image is bad, but he is still studying whatever he can find. 1861: The theory of pathogenic bacteria by Lewis Pasteur will be announced. This is an example of progress in the scientific interpretation of nature and the universe in the 19th century. Emily Dickinson uses poetry to emphasize the perceptual and subjective experience as a natural tool for studying at hand, so the word "hope is down" is used to observe and understand the world Provide different methods. Today: the scientific view of the universe dominates Western thought. Astrophysicists like Stephen Hawking are studying "black holes" or space with gravity, so electromagnetic waves (including light) can escape. "Black hole" theory was once extreme and wonderful, but now it is a general speech. The history of science we know today started in the 19th century. In the 19th century, industrialization stimulated the rapid development of all sciences. In the last century, James Hutton Williams Miss founded the foundation of scientific geology, when Hume, Kant, Cam, Herder, and Sir Condorche wrote their universal history. In the 19th century, Lyel systematically developed around the concept of homogenization theory, after which Darwin used the concept of natural selection to do the same research on biology. Just four years after the origin of Darwin, Lyle announced "geo emerald geological evidence". Please do not shoot.

American Poet Magazine was published in 1996, issued every April and October, and is published exclusively for members of American Poets Academy. Close-up of publications was written by some of today's most popular and influential poets. Many of the famous papers of this magazine include the revision process of Frank Bidart's Robert Lowell, Mark Doty's metaphor, mixed poetry by Christine Hume, Tyrias Moss's poetry restriction, Gerald Stern's heart crane There are contemporary version about, modern version of rosemary · waldrop etc. French poetry 'introduction' series shows more than 40 promising state-of-the-art poets, and many of them have already presented award-winning poetry. In the interview, the conversation with celebrities such as Eavan Boland, Rita Dove, Jorie Graham, Philip Levine, Stanley Kunitz, Robert Pinsky, James Tate was emphasized. The "Knowledge of Books" section provides readers with a useful perspective on the world of poetry publishing. Of course, all articles - whether declarations or memorials - are accompanied by special poems. American poets, novelists, and other writers often write about American identity. In this course I read two articles from Dwight Okita, "Correspondence to Executive Order 9066" and excerpt of "Sandra Cisneros" Mericans ". Identify common themes established by the two authors on the theme of American identity. I will explain how each author develops a common theme in a five-part document analysis article. Compare and contrast how authors develop this topic by referring to specific literary devices and techniques in your answer. By closely referring to at least two poems, we learn how the poet explores the theme of parent-child separation. In your answer, you should handle the poem background. * Comparison and similarity of poet 's method and method. * Please use language. * Your personal response to poetry, including your preferences. There are many poems on the basic theme of parent-child separation. I chose to write two poems. - Analysis of two verses; Pre-birth prayer and Monday Easter In this article we will analyze two verses. Both poetry reflects the theme of war. I analyze them in their meaning and form, and show how the poet uses languages ​​to express their thoughts and emotions. I decided to see Louis McNeese's "Before Birth" and Eleanor Farion's "Easter Monday." Louis McGinnis was born in 1907 and died in 1963. After identifying the topic, I briefly explained the topic and listed a poem explaining the topic. This approach may give the wrong impression that these topics are separate. In fact, two or more of these topics may appear in the same poem. Also, some topics such as pain and death are clearly related. When we explore our inner world and mental state, Dickinson presents a conscious drama personally. Dickinson saw the potential danger and loneliness of the world: "We can not save each depth of our own consciousness - no one can walk with us" Shin, 1878). For poet and critic Adriana Richie, "Dickinson is an American poet and his work includes exploration of spiritual extremes", and even wealthy people say "Emily Dickinson is a poet It is better than that. " Whether it is personal or psychological, its intense internal events can not be separated from the world. "

Given sociology, Durkheim is a very influential name. Durkheim's mission is to develop sociology, so you can define it and use it as a way to use sociology. Durchem is focusing mainly on his career when it is considered to be a past thing such as sharing religious views and ethnic backgrounds because in society the society has its integrity and rationality in modern society How to maintain. Regarding social realism of Durkheim, he is interested in growing individualism in society. An important, often misunderstood element of Durkheim's sociological approach can be found in the so-called Durkheim social realism. Alternatively, society is an objective and realistic entity which exists autonomously independently. This view is a concentrated picture of a specific individual. Social facts are seen as things through his prescription. In this realistic position, there are two important claims. First, Durkheim advocated ontological claims about the unique reality of social facts. Second, Durkheim argues that the epistemological and methodological claims that social facts should be viewed as reality objects that exist outside the minds of researchers and can be determined by the ability to do compulsive behavior I advocated. Therefore, Durkheim believes that there is a special existential nature in social facts, and when sociologists handle them in a proper and scientific way, they can discover and analyze them. In addition to the positivism of CONT, the second influence on Durkheim's view on society is an epistemological viewpoint called social realism. He never exposed it explicitly, but using a realistic view to prove the existence of social reality outside the individual, these facts exist in the form of social and objective relations showed that. As a scientific epistemology, realism can be defined as a viewpoint of placing external social reality in the external world, and these reality are independent of their individual perception and their central starting point I will use it as. This viewpoint is against other major philosophical views such as empiricism and positivism. Experians like David Hume believe that the reality of the outside world is a product of human perception. Context's positivism has advanced one step further, arguing that scientific law can be inferred from empirical observations.

In the theme # 3, while looking at myths and short stories, we compare and contrast "Genesis" and "Sneak into the center of the forest". There are many similarities, but there is a clear difference between "Genesis" and "Intrusion into the center of the forest". "Genesis" is a mythical story, "invading the forest center" is an adaptation. The mythological story (Adam and Eve) appears in the form of short stories. Compare and contrast these two stories, you can see the similarities between the scope and importance of the story, theme, symbol, details, and the story itself. Comparison and comparison of the creation stories of Genesis and Iroquois when reading two stories or stories created by Genesis and Iroquois. There are some similarities between the two. In Genesis, it talks about heaven and the earth just like the two worlds mentioned in Iroquo's story. (Iroko 's creative story 23 pages / Genesis 1 page). When we talked about the underlying world that the earth does not look dark, God created the sun, the moon and the stars to adjust the sun, the night, the season, and the year. (Iroko 's creative story, page 24 / Genesis, 1 page). In both talks, God places animals on land, water, birds and trees in the air. (Iroko 's creative story, page 24 / Genesis, 1 page). Among these two stories, God used their images to create men and women from dust and breathed their nostrils to give them life. (Iroko's creative story 24 pages / Genesis 2 pages). I also noticed many differences between the story of Iroquois and Genesis. During ~ In the theme # 3, while looking at myths and short stories, we compare and contrast "Genesis" and "Sneak into the center of the forest". There are many similarities, but there is a clear difference between "Genesis" and "Intrusion into the center of the forest". "Genesis" is a mythical story, "invading the forest center" is an adaptation. The mythological story (Adam and Eve) appears in the form of short stories. - Comparing words, Hume wrote a natural style and poetry in their poems and Hughes wrote a poem "蓟" on how these plants are. He said that they seemed to be symbols of violent and violent creatures. He believes that they are a symbol of revenge, pain, and threat. It is very sharp and can harm anyone. They produce a dull, immortal, green, rough, and a lot of confusion. ????????

Between the 2nd century BC and the century, the ACE Rome extended from the control of the city state to the Mediterranean Empire, the Roman Empire, it is the center of the civilized world. The era of Rome is over. Many people associate Rome with the United States. Rome rising to the power of the great world, Rome from zero, but they reached the peak, the US, then the same as today's fall. Rome and the United States are similar in many ways. Rome was an advanced civilization dominated by democracy in the past. Historians have been fascinated by the decline of great civilizations like ancient Greece and Rome. But for human beings, no more important lessons, rather than the collapse of the United States which has finished the era of virtue invisible in the dark age, and not including autumn than the whole planet. Ultimately even before the birth of the country was released, it destroys the powers of the United States of philosophy. This proposition can also be understood and the sun will not rise tomorrow, "Make sure that it does not become more contradictory Meaning: His philosophical skepticism of David Hume 1748" Investigate human understanding, "I wrote it rises. So we need to waste to prove that falsehood. 1781 ", so I know that it denies knowledge to make room for the necessary faith," he writes the criticism of pure reason Immanuel Kant "he founded, the founding of the United States 5 Published later years As usual, I am Patrick Wyman. You may still remember my old performance "Collapse of Rome". In Tides I am not only covering the fall of the Roman Empire but also the rise of the topic such as the rise of the modern world, the origin of the state, military revolution, capitalism and religious reform. Please consider the historical trend as a TV program that occurs at the same time in two seasons. The historical trend began with the podcast exploring the collapse of the West Roman Empire, "Roman Fall" but after reshuffling, by coping with the cause of Rome's fall, how to re-enter the social reintegration of the city, It will be bigger and more ambitious. To follow the late Middle Ages and the millennium early in modern Europe. Today, we are also hosting a lot of work together to communicate why history, archeology, sociology, religion, politics, and very delicate and complicated stories, moderator in terms of climate change, Patrick Wyman Patrick Wyman), you can tell us The world of life is how it looks

The reason why the women voted in 1918 was not treated as equal as men until the latter half of the 18 th century. They have to get married, follow her husband, and have children, and have to take a little education. From the viewpoint of the law, they have no power and men are their boss. For example, once they get married, all of them belong to their husbands. In other words, when separated, women are only husbands, so even children can not have anything. Female voting rights and its effect through the 19th century, feminists and feminists are striving for women's voting rights. Finally, in 1918 women were voted for women, but only women over 30 years old. However, voting rights are important, but that is not the only reason to win a franchise. Other reasons are concerns about the revival of feminist activities, governments following international trends, ... encountering historical drastic changes. Since both men and women have the right to vote in recent elections, women do not have the right to vote more than a century ago. Women in the United States gathered to raise an election, and Congress passed the 19th revision to the US Constitution, giving women the right to vote. Virginia state suffrage campaign began in 1870 Most independent countries such as Canada in the year 1917, Britain (over 30 years old in 1918, 21 years old in 1928), Germany, 1918 Polish, 1919 Austria and the Netherlands, 1920 were the two world wars We have enacted women's suffrage in voting rights. The "rights law" in 1965 guarantees the voting rights of ethnic minorities. Leslie Hume believes that World War I changed people's mood. The women's contribution to the war challenges the concept of physical and mental inferiority of women and it is not suitable for voting to maintain women regardless of physical or temperament. If a woman can work in an ammunition factory, rejecting them at polling stations seems ungrateful and illogical. But voting is not merely a remuneration for the work of war; the important thing is that women's participation in the war helps women eliminate fears of entering public places.

Adam Smith was born in Calcuti, Scotland on July 5, 1723. Steve entered the University of Glasgow at the age of 14, where he learned Francis Hutchinson 's moral philosophy. Here, Smith developed his strong passion for freedom, reason and freedom of speech. In 1740 he received the Snell Exhibition and entered the Ballet College of Oxford. In 1746 Smith left Oxford University. In 1748, Smith started a public lecture at Edinburgh under the auspices of the main case. In 1751 Smith was appointed Chairman of Glasgow Logic University and the following year he was appointed the position of Francis Hutchinson, president of ethics philosophy, his old teacher. Nicholas Phillips' new biography, "Adams Miss: Enlightened Life" (Ale; $ 32.50), which was very successful in putting together the two Smiths, shows how this feeling will become a financial god Let's see. . Historian Philipson of Edinburgh University pursued Rothschild and revealed that Smith is more like a moral person than a marketer. He discovered a deeper emotional vein and rarely made Smith Lord Byron, but he used events and plans to promote his life. One is his intimate friendship with philosopher David Hume, his nearest colleague, and his greatest influence, and his less direct embrace to Hume's notorious atheism. I realized that the real problem of Smith is not an issue of economists. How should a philosopher's question live? This is a modern question, Darwin's question: How do you find and unify the order in a world without God? Adam Smith: writer, philosopher, and pioneer of the economy. But why did Adam Smith make him so important? Adam Smith was born on June 16, 1723 and is known for writing books called country wealth. Among his books, Smith discusses the generally accepted paradox of economic philosophy and also proposes a better, more correct ideology. Before Smith wrote his theory about the wealth of the people, individuals only considered national economics as the term "import and export". Many people believe that the situation of imported goods is very bad as currencies leave the country. Of course this means export is good as money has entered the country. This ideology has brought many countries to manufacture it to limit imports. Several strategies include taxing imports and protecting livestock industry.

In his "Papers on Human Understanding" John Rocke discusses personal identity, and his attempt to prove personal identity depends on our memories . Locke also discussed about the changes in our Constitution that still could lead to the same personal identity. But I believe that Rock failed to explain certain aspects of memory that affect personal identity, so I believed that personal identity might not be recommended by lock . Locke distinguishes three things: God, limited intelligence and body. John Rock's Human Understanding Papers In John Rock's "Papers on Human Understanding" he distinguishes between the various ideas that we can think of as object perception. Locke divides these concepts into primary and secondary quality. No matter what criticism is necessary for this distinction, perceptions will happen by chance. - Both John Rock and Thomas Hobbes believe that men are essentially equal, but their personal view on equality suggests a fundamentally different approach to proper citizenship I guided you to do. Locke believes that the correct form of civilian government should pay attention to the common interests of people and protect citizens' rights to life, health, freedom, and personal property. The paper on human understanding is Jon Rock's job based on human knowledge and understanding. It first appeared in 1689 (although the date was 1690), it was printed under the heading "Papers on human understanding". He expressed his birth mind as a blank state (he did not use actual words, but tabla lasa) and then filled it with experience. This article is one of the main sources of empiricism in contemporary philosophy and it affects many enlightenment philosophers such as David Hume and George Berkeley. John Locke uses three arguments against natural ideas in the book "Papers on Human Understanding." The purpose of this paper is to discuss and explain his three arguments on natural ideas while discussing the views on John Rock's thought and detailing his view on the whiteboard. In addition, we will briefly explain other aspects of congenital thinking, along with competition and similarities. - Hobbes, Rock John Rock and Thomas Hobbes were a famous political theorist of the day. Hobbes who was born 40 years before the birth of rock has a totally different view from rock and both will do more research through this article. Many theories differ in the 16th century, but the rise of the country and the decline of the feudal system caused authority problems, so Hobbes and Rock's theory got closer.

Descartes believes that only unquestionable propositions can be regarded as knowledge. Do you agree? Do we know that something has no doubt? Description What is the reason why locks refuse to accept the concept of innate concepts? According to Locke, what is the difference between primary quality and secondary quality? Why is Hume skeptical about metaphysical problems? Why is the principle of induction not being justified or being justified first? If the principle of induction can not be proved, does it mean that we can not believe the discovery of science? why? As Descartes said, do you think that we can understand some of the facts of the world without feeling? why? Do you think John Rock's theory is more reasonable than the theory of Descartes? Description Below is a series of learning guidance questions to help prepare the examination papers. When considering possible answers to these questions, pay particular attention to creating clear, interesting, and debatable paper sentences. For more information on paper presentation and some examples, see Writing job recruitment. 1. How do various anthropologists define cultural concepts? What are the pros and cons of each definition? How should anthropologists in the 21st century define and study culture? Discuss the following three tasks: Marinovski / Rappa Port, Mead, Farmer, Gates, Steedley / Abrugo, Wilk / Watson, Ravinov It is useful to consider the statement of the paper as an answer by the author to the question of the paper. Please compare the paper presentation on page 5 of paper paper problem. The paper statement provides a basic answer to the question, and the remainder of this article will support this answer in more detail. One of the growing trends in the world against this lifestyle is the "Low Life" campaign. It is trying to regain a simpler and more balanced lifestyle based on the tradition of food and diet. With the slow life campaign, more and more people are eating more healthy foods, they prefer local imported foods, and the demand for organic cultivated crops and natural cultivated crops is increasing. For each of the following questions, please judge whether it matches the definitions of valid questions. If the paper question matches the definition, "Yes", if it does not match the definition, mark it "No". If the problem does not match the definition of a valid essay question, please rebuild the question to be consistent and fill in the answer in the space below the original question. Use the answer in Appendix A (page 42) to check your answer. What are the main advantages and limitations of the sample? Paper question? Example B Given its strengths and weaknesses, should paper questions be used to evaluate students' ability to create solutions to problems? In answering this question, please briefly explain the main advantages and limitations of this paper. Explain clearly whether or not you think you should use the question of the paper and explain the reason for the judgment

The United States is proceeding along the path of ancient Rome. There are many differences, but their similarities indicate a similar fate in the United States. My aim was to study the climate and structure of ancient Rome that brought about rapid success. And a similar system contributed to the rapid rise of the United States. By examining the results of this system, corruption and basic philosophy that brought the emergence of the "central government" of both countries and many countries that ended the Roman Republic era were presented. Historians have been fascinated by the decline of great civilizations like ancient Greece and Rome. But for human beings, no more important lessons, rather than the collapse of the United States which has finished the era of virtue invisible in the dark age, and not including autumn than the whole planet. Ultimately even before the birth of the country was released, it destroys the powers of the United States of philosophy. This proposition can also be understood and the sun will not rise tomorrow, "Make sure that it does not become more contradictory Meaning: His philosophical skepticism of David Hume 1748" Investigate human understanding, "I wrote it rises. So we need to waste to prove that falsehood. 1781 ", so I know that it denies knowledge to make room for the necessary faith," he writes the criticism of pure reason Immanuel Kant "he founded, the founding of the United States 5 Published later years For centuries the Roman Empire faced many challenges both inside and outside. Rome is adjacent to a more powerful country. The day of Rome collapse has room for debate. Historians also discovered various reasons. Some people think that the collapse of Rome is the beginning of the Middle Ages. In 184, the excellent emperor Marcus Orillus died. His son, Comodos, succeeded him who led the Treasury to bankruptcy. This is the beginning of the confusion of Rome. In 192 CE the army of Commodus assassinated him. Thanks to the ideal Emperor, the Imperial Armies also struck each other. Because of these internal wars repeated attacks by neighboring tribes succeeded. Probably Romans can protect themselves if they unite to fight enemies. The birth of many emperors in a few years shows the political instability of Rome and the division of its existence.

George Berkeley is a philosopher in Ireland. His philosophical belief is focused on one main belief that cognition is the foundation of existence. By doing so, he rejected the concept of the material world that supports the non-material world. What we really understand is what Berkeley learns from the perception of this thing. In the opinion of the materialist, he realized that the real thing is not related to the perception of any perception. Regardless of whether I feel that sensory experience for some reason or not, regardless of whether I see it in the room or not, my pen on my desk will exist. In this article we will investigate the existence of independent thinking objects based on the work of John Locke and George Berkeley. John Locke considers the existence of objects to be unrelated to our idea, but this does not mean that we do not have to pay a little attention. On the other hand, George Berkeley thinks there are no substances other than thought and concept. Therefore, there is no subject of independent thought. John Locke's reasoning is actually stronger than Berkeley, so coincidence is also the existence of objects of different minds. The argument supported by Locke is that we can determine the limits of our understanding of their existence, because of the ideas we gained from the five senses. First, I will detail in detail how Locke's reasoning supports this argument. Second, I seek to deny any form of material entity in Berkeley, hence the argument that the independent object is not independent. George Berkeley is one of the three most famous British experiences. (The other two are John Locke and David Hume.) Berkeley presented his early visual work (an article on new visual theory, 1709) and metaphysics (a paper on the principle of human knowledge, 1710; between Hilas and Filonas Dialog, 1713). Berkeley 's empirical vision theory challenges the current distance vision standards, which argues that it requires implicit geometric calculations. His alternative account focuses on visual and tactile objects. Berkeley believes that visual recognition of distance is explained by the interrelationship between vision and tactility. This association method eliminates the attractiveness of geometric computation and explains the illusion of monocular view and moon that plagued the geometric explanation.

The problem of evil in the study of religious philosophy "God is a complete creator with all things omnipotence" "There is evil in the world" a) Explain these two statements and show why they are considered contradictory (20) This problem is often seen as a matter of how the existence of God is in harmony with the existence of evil in the world. It is considered a logical problem because it is based on the obvious contradiction involved in having three incompatible beliefs. The problem of evil in philosophy What is the classic "evil problem" ("three difficulties") in the Western philosophy / theological tradition? The problem of evil is how to harmonize the existence of evil with omnipotence, omniscience, and the presence of the Almighty God. Greek philosopher Epicuras detailed this trilemma in ancient times and summarized it in modern David Hume. Epicuras advocates a trilemma to counter the concept of almighty The problem of evil has two branches. Evil logic problem (LPOE) seeks to prove that the existence of evil contradicts the existence of omnipotence and omnipotent existence. The evidence evidence question (EPOE) tries to prove that the existence of an amount or kind of evil contradicts the existence of somewhat effective and benevolent entity. Of course, not all Gods are considered omnipotent, omnipotent, or either. Many gods are morally defective, positive evil, simply indifferent, and not omnipotent. The evil logical matter does not apply to these gods, but evidence of evil evidence still holds true. This is consistent with the idea of ​​evil. That is, there are defective evil, irrelevant, or totipotent entities compatible with reality and the existence of omnipotent and omnipotent entities is not. The problem of evil can be formulated in various ways. Indeed, the 'problem' pointing to evil may be more accurate. Recipes are interpreted as logical problems. Regarding the logic of evil, it is claimed that these two arguments, (1) that Almighty and Almighty God exists, and (2) the existence of evil is logically incompatible. Since evil exists on the surface, it is claimed that God (usually understood to be omnipotent and omnipotent) does not exist. In the latter part of the 20th century, logical arguments became dominant. But by the end of the century religious philosophers generally believed that the logic was rebutted. One of the reasons is that there must be hidden or unspecified assumptions as claims (1) and (2) are not clearly contradictory. But what is that?

Thomas Robert Malthus Thomas Robert Malthus is one of the most controversial figures in economic history. His reputation derives primarily from the demographic theory closely related to his name. Contrary to the view of the latter half of the eighteenth century that it is possible to raise people's living standards, Malthus believes that such improvements lead to population growth and therefore to reverse these benefits. Malthus also said that (rather than thinking that the economy can experience high unemployment rates over the long term) (rather than thinking that economics should be experience, not deductive science) than theoretical theory Thomas Robert Malthus was born in February 1766 near Guildford, Surrey. His father succeeded at home and accepted Thomas' s education. Malthus then studied at the University of Cambridge and received a master's degree in 1791. In 1793 he became a researcher at Jesus University in Cambridge. In 1805, Malthus became a professor of history and political economics at the University of East India Company in Hailey Berry, Hertfordshire until his death. Malthus became a member of the Royal Society in 1819, two years later was appointed a member of the political and economic club, including David Ricardo and James Mill. In 1824, he was elected as one of the royal family members of the Royal Literature Society. Malthus also co-founded the London Statistics Association in 1834. Thomas Robert Malthus died on 23rd December 1834 Thomas Robert Malthus Thomas Robert Malthus is one of the most controversial figures in economic history. His reputation derives primarily from the demographic theory closely related to his name. Contrary to the view of the latter half of the eighteenth century that it is possible to raise people's living standards, Malthus believes that such improvements lead to population growth and therefore to reverse these benefits. Malthus also said that (rather than thinking that the economy can experience high unemployment rates over the long term) (rather than thinking that economics should be experience, not deductive science) than theoretical theory Thomas Malthus, Thomas Robert Malthus, (1766 13 February, the UK Surigord near Roquery, died in 1834 December 29, St. Catherine, Bath, is best known in the summer his theory, the UK economy near the scholar and Seth is demographers, population growth tends to exceed the food supply, and without strict breeding restrictions, human improvement is not possible. this idea is often called the Malthusian. Malthus was born to a wealthy family. his father is skeptical David Hume of friends philosopher, Jean-Jacques Rousseau has been under the influence of his book Émile (1762) is about to educate the son it might be a source of liberal thought. young Malthus, until he enrolled in Cambridge, Jesus College in 1784, was educated in most of the time home. So he is the many subjects And research, was awarded the Latin and Greek awards, I graduated in 1788.

Moral judgment Jakob Bronowski's book "Science and Humanities Values" claims that a realistic scientific exploration method provides a universally applicable basis for moral judgment. Bronnowski continues to select the society of truth rules in order to make the research easier to manage, so the society I study is formed by the scientist himself, it is the body of the scientist "( Bronowevsky 58). Bronnowski revealed in his book that he will make his research based on scientists. Relativism must face objectiveism of moral status. The latter thinks that moral judgment is true or false in an absolute or universal sense. Because they are based on objective facts people have reasons to accept true moral decisions. Therefore, moral judgment is evidence of a rational and knowledgeable person. Herman opposed the concept of objective ethics which relied on objective facts. "Objective facts are essential to explain what we observe and therefore virtual moral facts are not essential, so there is no moral truth (Harman, 1997). It is because we have moral thinking to judge whether it is right or wrong, but moral thinking is only a correct, wrong view of social teaching.The physical process, but our growth Something determined by (belief, concept, expectation) We made moral decisions. We made moral and moral decisions. It is a tough decision. At some point today, these decisions are performed autonomously in this situation, but in fact they are manufactured everyday. In many of our words, we are turning to Mark Zuckerberg. If you see what happens in both cases. One is a trolley problem with death, and the other is the same value of currency loss, you go to the UK or another strange country. Westerners are educated, industrialized, wealthy, and democratic. Save 5 and kill 1. In theory, this Confucianism says "Let fate go with the flow". (Please see the cultural differences of Natalie Gold's response to real life and supposed car problems) On the review of moral judgment, the third major objection was raised. We often conclude that moral judgment is wrong. If moral judgment is mere emotion, this conclusion is irrational. Do not miss it. We may feel one way at a time and may feel different in other ways. This does not mean that the first emotion is wrong. It only means a change in emotion. Philosopher David Hume raised a potential answer to this objection. If the emotions are based on false beliefs, then what is the title? Is it wrong? It may be due to the emotions of those beliefs

"George Berkeley: Esse Est Percipi?" George Berkeley is a Catholic priest living in the 17th century (price, 206). He wrote some of the most profound works of the era, most of which was characterized by rationalism and British empiricism. Berkeley is a member of an empiricist. Generally, British empathists believe that knowledge comes from senses and 'sensory experiences' (Price, 193). Therefore, they believe that there is no natural knowledge, only knowledge is obtained, or they are posterior (Price, 193). John Rock was a British philosopher of the 17th century and contributed to the foundation of modern political discourse and empiricism. He will influence the revision of George Berkeley and David Hume and the theory of social contract, which will lay the foundation for liberal democracy and classical republicanism. Rock will be an influential figure in the formation of the initial US government and the drafting of the national constitution. His political theory will also affect the ideas of Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Emmanuel Kant, John Rawls, Robert Nozick. Many people think the view of rock is similar to modern liberalism, but like most political philosophers it is difficult to classify him as a single ideology. Idealism is a philosophical system developed by Irish philosopher George Berkeley (1685-1783). To be an idealist means that he believes that something like a problem does not exist outside the mind. According to Berkeley, if I do not feel it with five senses, there will be no pencil that I wrote this article. In addition to human thought and our perception, Berkeley is trying to prove that things exist and exist. In the dialogue between Berkeley and Hilos and Filonos, they point out either gods that all ideas are recognized, or gods who perceive the human mind. In other words, according to Berkeley, God is the ultimate creator of our perception. Because of this belief, he ultimately refused such philosophy like Lucretius. Among them Lucretius tried to deny the existence of God. Therefore, while Berkeley can not understand the outside world through thought, he said "wise things".

Philosophy and faith can constitute a troublesome combination. People want to believe in higher powers, life after death, and why bad things happen to good people. But from a philosophical standpoint, I do not understand this. There is never an answer to a philosophical question. I think this is the source of faith. Philosophers such as Hume, Wittgenstein and Plantinger point out that although our discussion has no logical argument, they still exist and are norms. Neculetism The philosophy that doubts the existence of God is related to the lack of evidence, but at the same time a strong illusion is philosophy, a collection of illusions leading to the environment formed by human consciousness, all humans live there There. Non-materialistic is a philosophy that believes there is no important purpose, but all reality is a construct of imperfect perception. Immoral human race should try to pursue perfect eternal aesthetic philosophy. Another name for immortal immortalization (or eternal life) is the concept of a potential infinite or indefinite period. Throughout history, mankind has longed for eternal life. Whatever form of infinite or infinite human life it will take, or even if it is possible, it is subject to much speculation, fantasy, and discussion. See also inductive reasoning. One of the biggest contributions of Thomas was to incorporate Aristotle's philosophy into the Catholic church theology. Thomas believes that reason and faith are one and support one another, and it is believed that the Bible and the fathers of the Church and Aristotle's inference combine the inference of the Aristotle with a unified system and Christianity I understand the revelation of. His most famous work is Summa Theologica, 5 volume masterpiece. St. Thomas Aquinas introduced the classical way of teaching the Bible. Looking back on Gregory's words, the Bible transcends all science. "Despite explaining the facts in the same sentence, it reveals a mystery." Spiritual meaning, fable, truth, morality, praise of life, and the final event to be achieved I will clarify the purpose. The details of his seven sacramas are still our standard today.

At the most basic level of subconsciousness, all living animals have the desire to live. Normally, this instinct is in a dormant state, but in severe circumstances it may be led to do unexpected things. In addition to this subconscious movement, there is also a motivation for creating a society afraid of death. Due to the universality of historical religion, many people are a bit worried about permanent curses and torture in post-mortem life. In his poem "The Objects of Objects" religion is one of Luce's favorite themes. All that religion makes to human beings and all the fear of life after death is the doctrine of life, which is unfair to Lucretius. Because the essence of the gods themselves must be immortal, but the lives of people are faithful and shrinking in the awaited state of religion. Throughout this article, Lucretius proved to be extremely harsh to religion. "The religion that was destroyed at our feet was injured in order, and his victory kept us at the same level as heaven." This famous criminal warrior and conqueror of evil is an example of Lucius's writing. For Romans reading this article, 亵渎 may be their tongue, but Lucretios has enough wisdom to point out religious crime as a counterattack for the readers. Whether observation of this quote feels comfortable to those who are afraid of death is not a problem. Lucretius believes that his view is an antidote to the fear of death penetrated into irrational religion and poison at the last moment of many believers, even if not life. Hume says there is nothing at the time of death and birth. Various ideas are based on his death. In Epicurean 's philosophical tradition, I believe that the answer is "eyes", but highly trained philosophical training is necessary to take it into account. On the other hand, it may not be a general sense of security that even highly educated people never exist inadvertently. Julian Burns will investigate contemporary scenes. Tennysen can say in the 19th century:

In the era of imperialism, the Western European group successfully conquered the majority of the world. In 1884, these countries directed their website to Africa during the Berlin Conference, and by the end of the nineteenth century Africa was almost completely dominated by colonial countries. However, there are countries that can resist the power of land starvation and continue to be independent. That is Ethiopia. In 1896 they resisted the Italian attacks in the Adowa battle as one of the two African countries that could successfully resist them colonial rule. As the two oldest independent countries in Africa, these two countries have different forms of ancient relations. From ancient times until 1959, Ethiopian Orthodox Church of Tedahedo was managed by Coptic Orthodox Church. The Ethiopian army and the Egyptian army collided at the beginning of the 19th century by dominating the modern Sudanese territory and Ethiopia into the Red Sea. Both countries established formal diplomatic relations in 1927. Recently, both countries are members of the Nile Basin Initiative as there is a special relationship between the two countries of the Nile Basin. The struggle between Christian countries in the Hume region of Ethiopia and Muslims in Somalia and the Red Sea coastalized the majority of the history of this area and today's country. With the help of the Ottoman Turkish, when one of the Muslim countries threatened the Kingdom of Ethiopia, in 1542 the Portuguese expedition arrived in Masawa in the Red Sea and turned to supporting that Christian alliance. Since that time, Portuguese have tried to bring Ethiopian Christianity to the Roman Catholic Church, but Ethiopia is still isolated, Christian, and intensely independent. Muslims conquered Egypt in 640 BC, putting Christian Ethiopia in a defensive position. Since the Ethiopian Orthodox Church is still affiliated with the Alexander Orthodox Church and Egypt is a Muslim nation, the Ethiopians are skeptical and dissatisfied with the control over the appointment of their Christian faith . Muslims and Egyptians also have the right to rule Jerusalem and expel Ethiopian pilgrims to their most sacred cities. As a result, the Ethiopians began to claim power to Egypt by dominating the Nile. During the crusade, Emperor Lalibela (1190 - 1225) of Ethiopia built a new Jerusalem in Ethiopia. There, Muslims took over the magnificent underground rock churches by shifting the Sudan Heck Tech from the northern route. This became Atbara and then joined Nile.

I will ask you a question, do you believe in miracles? Or more properly, in today's scientific era, you think that it is illogical to combine facts from common sense with the facts that can prove evidence of supernatural intervention. This is the moment of thinking about that. Let's guess, you are going to sit there and make up your mind. Do not worry, you are not the first person who does not believe in miracles. In the past, Scottish philosopher David Hume did not believe it about two centuries ago. Sports caster Al Michaels exclaimed unforgettably "Do you believe in miracles? Yes!" The 1980 US Olympic hockey team beat the Russian team. Then they continue to win the gold medal. Therefore this team of the last amateur hockey player sent by the United States was called "Ice Miracle". Miracle reconstructed the team's Olympic gold medal training, strategy and important moments with great care. This silver medal won Kurt Russell's excellent performance as coach Herb Brooks. Russell thinks that he is willing to be unattractive in appearance and behavior in order to convey the style hidden by Brooks' famous tough. As the movie shows, the miracle is the last word used to explain this team. This is better than a miracle. Because this is the story of team success, effort and dedication. If this is a miracle, it is a category of "God is helping those self-helpers". This is not an "intimate and personal" legend Do you believe in miracles? I know that I am doing this. First of all, we are all given the greatest miracle of our life ... think about it. We have gifts that we can experience all things offered in life and learn from the pleasure and pain of life. Albert Einstein said, "There are only two ways to life, there is nothing miraculous, or everything seems to be the case." It is a miracle. Is not this a miracle when someone is still breathing when they escape the bad accident? Is not it a miracle when someone wins cancer or trying to survive a heart attack? Is not this a miracle when somebody elects to forgive someone after the really bad injury? There are miracles around us, and many people refuse to turn their eyes on them.

Plato and Aristotle explain the world around us. How can I understand the truth? Decades ago Plato and Aristotle started looking for answers. Surprisingly, all philosophy since then can be explained as a reinterpretation of the first argument between Plato and Aristotle. The doctrine of Plato and Aristotle is in stark contrast to the concept of reality, the knowledge of birth, and the mechanism for finding the truth. First, Plato's realistic concept is in stark contrast to Aristotle's concept. Author: Gerard · Cretian Plato and Aristotle Many modern experts believe Plato was the first true political philosophy, Aristotle is the first political scholar. They are the foundation of Socrates's great thinker and great Western philosopher. Plato and Aristotle each have ideas on how to improve their society during their existence. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze their different theories with this heavy metaphysical speculation. In conclusion, Hume wishes to limit metaphysical speculation to one field and is not so inclined to such a fate. Aristotle and Plato's excellence is a function, and what makes it a function is the definition of Plato's virtue. What does this definition mean? Both Plato and Aristotle have their own unique arguments dedicated to the topic in front of you and a way to explain what virtue is. It seems easy to define virtues, but it may be very difficult to truly understand the arguments behind the definition. - Definition of Philosophy Personal or moral philosophy is about how people should live or how to act. People who claim that the philosophy of our life is "lifetime", "at horn", or some cliches are often heard. Though the definitions are correct, these people use the phrase "philosophy", but the words closely related to our past, present and future great thinkers are different. When talking about ancient Greek, the first ideas were Plato and Aristotle. These two names are the most important philosophers in the history of philosophy. Plato and Aristotle have almost always to say. Ethics, politics, science, science, mathematics, geometry etc. are all interested in this topic. Plato is a philosopher and mathematician of ancient Greece, born at Stadix in Athens City in 424 BC, died in 348 BC. At the same time, Plato is also a student of Socrates. Plato founded the academy, the first higher education institution in Western Europe, in Athens.

Analysis of Randall Jarrell's "Death of The Gunners" Much of the wonderful poetry we read today was written during anguish. One of the writers is Randall Jarrell. Born in Nashville, Tennessee on May 6, 1914, Jarrell and his parents moved to Los Angeles where his father worked as a photographer. When Jarrel and his wife divorced, Randall and his brothers returned to Nashville to live with their mothers. In Nashville, Randall went to Hume-Froger high school. Randall Jarrell's "The Death of The Gunners" tells us the waste of life and a ruthless war. The turret gunner is probably the most dangerous job among the crew. When entering the ball turret, the gunner has very little space to move and it is very narrow. In this narrow space, the gunman faced a very cold temperature and had to push it into the position of the fetus: "I felt a state from my mother's sleep. -2" In most cases, Especially in this poem, when the turret and gunner leave the "womb" of the Air Force, he will fall from the torso and face death. When tying this to real birth, Jarrell may say that people born in this world eventually have to face death, and some people will be faster than others. Jarrell also gives us a deeper understanding of the cruelty of war. "The death of The Gunners" by Randall Jarrell is a poem about the storm of war and even useless things in life. Turret gunners are one of the most dangerous tasks for airborne crews. When pushed into the Plexiglas dome, the gunner had only a small maneuvering space. Most men choose the position of the fetus to compensate for the extreme weather that must bear with a narrow place. "I fell down in the country as a result of my mother's sleep. / I turned over until my wet fur froze" (1-2). The first line seems to indicate that he was involved in this dilemma when he was born, he is just another number. You must eventually give up on the "uterus" from the aircraft fuselage or your own mother; from that moment you may soon face death. However, Jarrell may send another message. Jarrell tries to lead the fears and mysteries of thousands of young fighters

When introducing a person to another person or introducing two people, tell each other their names so that they can understand each other. If you introduce yourself to others, you will tell them your name. Both philosophers and scientists like the definition of freedom, in short, the ability to do other things. In the 1969 paper, philosopher Harry Frankfurt introduced "Principles of alternative possibility" based on this definition, "People can do it only when they can do it" I explained. The problem is morally responsible. Even though there is a tendency to doubt the validity of this principle - and Frankfurt - its direct intuitive appeal can not be denied. Talking about moral responsibility is meaningful if you can not take other forms of past actions. Based on the definition of causality by Halpern and Pearl, I will introduce the definition of responsibility and responsibility. You can not say that the definition is "correct" or "wrong", but you can check and verify the usefulness of the definition, in particular how much it perceives our intuition. Causal relationships have been widely discussed in philosophical literature, and many examples show the subtleness of this concept. Therefore, a useful strategy to demonstrate the definition of causality is useful and suggests that these examples can be handled well. This is actually done for the definition of causality in Halpern and Pearl (see (Halpern & Pearl, 2004a)). In this paper, we propose the definition of responsibility taking this distinction into account. This definition is an extension of the definition of causality introduced by Halpern and Pearl (2004a). Just like many other definitions of causality, you can go back to Hume (1739). This is based on counterfactual dependence. Roughly speaking, A is the reason of B. If A does not occur (A occurs, this is a condition contrary to the fact), B will not occur. As we all know, this simple definition does not capture all the nuances related to causality. In the case of 6 votes and 5 votes, according to this definition, it is clear that all Mr. B's votes are because he won. To Mr. B, he lost. On the other hand, in the case of 11-0 votes, there is no reason based on a simple anti-factual definition.

Evil Issues The Jewish / Christian tradition is based on the belief that there is a supernatural individual, he is the ultimate creator, and all other existence can be attributed to their existence. The three main features lie in this (God?), Completely good (all power), completely strong (full power), and all known (omniscience). This is the basis of Western religious thought, and forming the subject of this article is the relationship between these features and evil. The problem of evil in philosophy What is the classic "evil problem" ("three difficulties") in the Western philosophy / theological tradition? The problem of evil is how to harmonize the existence of evil with omnipotence, omniscience, and the presence of the Almighty God. Greek philosopher Epicuras detailed this trilemma in ancient times and summarized it in modern David Hume. Epicuras advocates a trilemma to counter the concept of almighty The problem of evil has two branches. Evil logic problem (LPOE) seeks to prove that the existence of evil contradicts the existence of omnipotence and omnipotent existence. The evidence evidence question (EPOE) tries to prove that the existence of an amount or kind of evil contradicts the existence of somewhat effective and benevolent entity. Of course, not all Gods are considered omnipotent, omnipotent, or either. Many gods are morally defective, positive evil, or simply indifferent, and not omnipotent. The evil logical matter does not apply to these gods, but evidence of evil evidence still holds true. This is consistent with the idea of ​​evil. That is, there are defective evil, irrelevant, or totipotent entities that are compatible with reality and the existence of omnipotent and omnipotent entities is not

One of the most important and wonderful features of human value, and that Beckett is waiting for Godot civilization and Freud civilization, and that dissatisfaction in today's society is the progress that has taken place over time. Humans have never seen the technological progress that is happening now. These advances cover almost everything human beings know about life, from biomedical engineering to space exploration. I found that science is suitable for the expansion of life and mind. Ibsen's "enemy of the people" in science and human values, Beckett is waiting for Godot and Freud's civilization and its dissatisfaction. These people have both real history and imaginary historical records. Even Aristotle, Copernicus, Galileo, Bacon, and even Freud are laying the foundations in that field, the revolutionary idea still feels shock waves. - Comparing Plato Seminar and David Hume's study on human understanding philosophy, it means philosophy, love, signs and words when it is broken down into primitive Greek. Therefore, philosophy is love for language and linguistics. There is no way to see this love for words. Plato and David Hume investigate philosophy in their texts, seminars and investigations on human understanding. The fact that Ibsen's "enemies of people" and Beckett are waiting for the values ​​and techniques of God's literature was a way for authors to always express the importance of human values ​​for human civilization. However, even before most ordinary people have literacy skills, some people learn stories from the Bible, historical stories and so on. This gives the public the opportunity to see stories and learn various lessons from the play. . - Existence judgment, resentment judgment and resentment The Webster dictionary defines existentialism as "People have absolute freedom of choice, the universe is ridiculous, emphasizes anxiety and alienation." In the 1940s the existentialism became a philosophical world, the group of existential philosophers became famous celebrities in the United States. The themes of existentialists were exhibited especially in the absurd drama "Waiting for Goddo" by Samuel Beckett. Transfer yourself. They insisted that Godot is an acquaintance, but in reality he knew little of him, and admitted that he would not admit him if I saw him. Samuel Beckett once asked who Godault is or what he is saying and answered, "I will say this in theater." Let's play games, exercise, exchange hats, think about suicide. The play uses "several prototype forms and situations, all of which apply to comedy and tragedy." This can only be reconciled in absurd thinking and art.

Edgar Malroy will be regarded as the hero of the reader of Skepticism Inc. Edgar receives money from a wealthy church and hands it to the poor. This Robin Hood image makes Edgar various champions. And the reader will eventually protect him through the story. On the surface, the means to take Edgar's money is legal. However, bets never win, and better emotions will affect their ability to make decisions. If there is no clear result, a person can accept a bet by betting on conscience. Before we begin talking about it, this means that we first let you define the history of skepticism and skepticism. Skepticism is a position that philosophers can take and is a measure of doubt to avoid the ultimate truth. Skepticism and Pyronik skepticism are ideas conceived by Ellis Pillow in about 330 B.C. Michael Phillips Professor of Philosophy at Portland State University points out that there is a need to doubt the existence of tangible objects such as food in an article that "skepticism is ridiculous." Basically it is hypocritical to use doubts on something's reality. The biggest skeptics like history such as David Hume, Descartes and Bertrand Russell are puzzled by this funny puzzle. Some philosophers argue that it is possible to accept the tangible world, but they continue to cast doubt on the moral and theoretical parts of life. This question makes us face fundamental skepticism. I will also explain the possibility that it is not very radical but potentially hindered, and the skepticism that is not so skeptical yet. Is there any knowledge of the physical world? Is there scientific knowledge? Is there any knowledge about moral truth? Do not you know the future? It is like this. Let's look at one of them now. This is one of the most famous non-radical skeptics in the world of philosophy - I doubt the knowledge of the outside world. (This is skeptical, in order to deny what most people are accepting, skeptical denial in this sense is amazing.)

The theme of Antigone in 2013 is the fight between political law and moral law; the difference in obeying the law is that it is legal and obeys its own morality as you think it is right. Antigone's role faced this struggle when Kryon refused to bury Antikone's Polykines brothers. The ancient Greeks believed that it was forbidden to enter the afterlife without proper burial. Through her own moral position Beginning from the origin of Western philosophical thinking, people became interested in moral law. As Hume pointed out in his thesis, "morality is the theme that makes us happy" (David Hume's "Anthropology theory"). First, the idea of ​​how to live is the problem of having the most satisfying life, "The Virtue of Managing Relationships between One Person and Others" (JB Schneewind's " Philosophy "). But having a lifestyle perspective is best for everyone. Kant's responsibility system is based on special advantages and bad habits; these obligations are based on moral law, the highest principle of morality. According to Kant, the moral law highlights that it is an absolute command (CI) for incomplete and limited rational creatures such as us. All our responsibilities are based on this highest ethical principle. In the basic work, Kant described in detail some of his CI statements. A formula of universal law orders, "based on the saying that you can make it a universal law at the same time" (G. 4: 421). The universal natural law formula, "as if your motto motto was made by your will" (G. 4: 421). The last expression is the command itself. "So, whether it's yourself or someone else, it's always the last time, not just as a means, but as a use of human behavior" (G 4: 429) According to Kant, the moral value of action depends on the will of that person, which is the only thing in the world that can be regarded as good if it is not qualified. Act in good faith according to ethical responsibility / legal measures. Moral law consists essentially of an absolute series of maxims - we are responsible for acting in accordance with absolute orders. Kant pointed out that a true moral proposition can not be tied to specific conditions, including the identity of the person making the decision. The Code of Ethics is not related to the specific physical details surrounding the proposition and should be applied to reasonable existence. According to Kant, we have a complete duty not to use maxims that lead to logical contradiction at first. The moral system of Emmanuel Kant was built around the sorting order. Classification order is a universal and absolute ethical standard. These orders build moral ethics, or what Kant calls "moral order". According to him, they must be applied to all situations, every situation. The decision does not change according to the situation. The order of classification is an important feature of the Kant 's order and he believes that true morality depends only on the principle of guiding behavior, not depending on the final result. Kant thinks morality is absolute and proofable; the right thing can be determined by putting actions or maxims into the equation.

What is the difference between Kant's perceptual judgment and empirical judgment? What is the difference? Understanding how thinking works is always a major goal of philosophy and its important part includes how human beings experience the world. Many philosophers tried to study this problem, and Hume successfully proposed a framework that can understand human understanding. But this article has inspired Kant 's philosophical thinking and has led him to awaken from "dogmatic sleep" and to develop a unique framework for defining ideas. Kantoism is a philosophical theory created by a man named Emmanuel Kant. According to Emmanuel Kant or Kantism, his theory emphasizes the modern position and deals with spiritual philosophy, epistemology and ethics. - On September 3, 1929, James "Whitey" Bulger was born into an Irish American family in Dorchester, Massachusetts (traditional.com, 2015). As the first child of the six children, White is not usually a noticeable feature, especially as parents continue to produce more children as they get older. As he and his brothers grew, it was clear that the intelligence of White was different from that of young boys. Immanuel Kant was born in Königsberg, East Prussia in 1724. Kant's grandfather moved from Scotland to East Prussia and even his father spelled their last name as "Cant". Kant's father was a saddle maker (craftsman), Kant was unable to go to the university. Kant's parents belong to so-called pious factions, a strict and devout Christian school, and Emanuel is strongly influenced by this kind of thinking. After graduating from college in 1746, Emmanuel Kant needs to be a mentor of wealthy family children for 9 years. German philosophers Immanuel Kant and Karl Marx's work played an important role in the development of different philosophical religious sects. Emmanuel Kant was born in Königsberg, East Prussia in 1724. Currently, Kaliningrad is a poor household with the reverence of eleven children. Through his study, it is clear that Kant was promoted in the value of religious doctrine and faith, as his theory shows the significant influence of his religious education. Kant is accustomed to being a little boy

My parents do not care about integrity. They want children to be honest, but they do not emphasize themselves like Puritans. This world is made up of lies. As I said, "History is a set of agreed lies." This is probably true. Much of today's notorious work is known for its liar skills. Today's lawyers in society are taught to tell lies. Lying is an important part of today's society, and Puritans do not like it much. They would have been very depressed Quoting Nietzsche's words, "Our beasts want to be deceived, morality is a white lie to prevent tearing us." A very large number of people may have agreed on the criteria for guaranteeing the survival of everyone. But it is clear that there is no explicit consent, or there is no "immoral" behavior. It is possible to see the validity. Nietzsche's statement can be linked to the statement at the beginning of Hume. Individuals not only disturb coexistence but also insult people who commit malicious behavior for some shame. This is an interesting question. I think that there is something I heard that "winners write down the history". Or Napoleon Bonaparte is recognized as "history is an agreed lie". It was rewritten by the ruler. Rulers dominate the media and control recognition of who and who are enemies. If powerful people can control our past perceptions, they can control how the future will evolve based on their ability to control the media and military. By effectively using persuasive forces, people can convince their friends that they are enemies yesterday.

A causal relationship is a causal relationship, or a behavior that brings about a result, possibly an event, a country, or an object. For a long time the concept of causality has been considered to be one of the important foundations of philosophy. Hume calls it "cement of the universe": causality is the relationship between events and things in this world in an important relationship. Furthermore, causality is closely related to interpretation. The interpretation of the event is necessary to ask the cause. Metaphysics is a study of the most common features of reality such as existence, time, objects and their attributes, whole and part, events, processes and causal relationships, and relationships between the body and mind. Metaphysics includes cosmology, research on the whole world and ontology, and research on existence. One of the main arguments of the discussion is realism, that is, realism has entities that are independent of their psychological awareness and idealism. Metaphysics includes the theme of identity. Essence is a series of properties based on an object, it loses its identity if not, the accident is the property owned by the object, the object can retain its identity without it I will. In the 1960 's, Richard Taylor published a metaphysical theory of free will that departed from the traditional controversy between determinist and uncertainty theorist and claimed new choice, self - determinism in academia. He called this new psychological model "agent theory" and according to it, insisted that "people - perhaps others - sometimes, but not always, but self-determining existence". In other words, he acknowledges that, in stark contrast to the incompetent role seen in incompatible philosophy, there are also people who sometimes cause their own actions. The causal relationship problem constitutes the fourth important issue in "new" metaphysics. Of course, the argument for that reason can be traced back to the ancient philosophy, which has a standing position in Aristotle's metaphysics and physics. But Aristotle understands 'cause' more widely than we do today. In Aristotle's sense, "cause" or "cause" is the interpretation of the object - the answer to the "why" question of the object. Aristotle classifies the four interpretive conditions - target form, substance, effective cause, and objective theory. The effective reason for the object is to explain the cause of the change or movement within the object. With the rise of modern physics in the 17th century, the interest in effective causation has increased rapidly, and it does not change today. When contemporary philosophers discuss causality, they usually mean this meaning.

"A big idea that affects knowledge and aesthetic movements ... Firstly we introduced a community of writers and artists through philosophy.The philosophical text is a definition and boundary that influences the idea of ​​Western thought, art, science and politics The time of Plato and Aristodd ... "- Art Berman, Foreword of modernism. John Merriman's' dynamite club 'delicately depicts the decline and injustice of Paris' bourgeois capitalist world, which promoted the expansion of anarchist ideology and even dyed its destructive beliefs. The color of virtue and justice. In philosophy, genealogical methods are not focused, but the emergence of various philosophical and social beliefs that are generally understood by attempting to consider the range, width or overallness of ideology during the problem It is a historical technique that doubts. In single or dominant ideological epistemology, we first attempted to extend Nietzsche, later Michelle Foucault as a new sociological method of genealogy concept (mainly in "history" of sex and punishment) . In this respect, Foucault is strongly influenced by Nietzsche. Foucault intends to use the term "genealogy" to evoke the moral strain of Nietzsche in order to raise a complicated, secular and dishonorable origin, not part of a systematic historical plan in particular . The point of pedigree analysis is that the specific ideology (which itself reveals its basic structure through archeology and therefore part of Foucault's history) is not a trend of inevitable reason, but a chance transition of history It is to show that it is the result of. My historical discussion of the term 's identity is from metamorphism in general in the history of philosophy - to follow two important developments in identity - metaphysical. Main genealogies follow evolution theory, psychology, and ultimately the development of identity as a national term. This evolution follows the main path of British empiricism of the 17th century, Scottish Enlightenment of the 18th century, and Utilitarianism of the 19th century. John Locke and David Hume develop their meanings into personal identities. This meaning was completed in the context of James Mill's Scottish Enlightenment. John Stuart Mill introduced it as a concept of collective psychology. I think he is the first person to use it as a citizen's identity in the sense of a modern center. In the more general era of the 20th century, philosophy was almost abandoned, downgraded to academic disciplines, considered a viable lifestyle or value system. This is the first chapter of Surwillo, essence of genealogy and ethics. After Greek and Roman stoicism planted benign life seeds based on knowledge and reason, it soon died to the European Renaissance and enlightenment. Still, until the US practicalism emerged in the 19th century, philosophy did not become feasible again. Philosophy continues to experience various expressions ranging from systematic theory to rock music, but it is further subdivided by postmodernism, revealing the truth only in the "intermediate space". (Page 29)

I discussed the philosophical significance of Kant's great cosmology in 1755 as "the natural history of the universe". I will discuss how Kant 's interest in Newton' s space powers led to confirm the special version of physics influx theory. Kant's guess about living on other planets as it points out that the important feature of Kant's physics influx theory, the 'flexible movement of the body' is a necessary condition for the possibilities of knowledge It is very important. In general, Kant believes that if it can recognize a deductive principle that the knowledge system can "present intuitively" (4: 471) with a mathematical description, it can only count as science in a truly meaning It is. Therefore, Kant is pessimistic about the possibility that empirical psychology is equivalent to true science. Kant thought that "chemistry is merely systematic art or experimental doctrine, not an appropriate science" (4: 471). Kant's interest in physics theory began very soon. His first work, "A Consideration on the Real Estimation of Vigor" (1749) is the exploration of some basic problems in physics, and it is about how to go about between Leibniz and Descartes Enter "visualization". "(" Energetic ") argument. Quantify the power to move objects (in most cases Kant supports Leibniz) Kant began to investigate purely "transcendental" reasons by establishing his criticisms. He said that there is a boundary and contents. He began looking for restrictions on internal and external content. Kant studied three knowledge systems, mathematics, physical science, metaphysics. Kant said that science must be necessary and universal. This makes mathematics and science reasonable. Kant first broke down judgment into two types of knowledge: analysis and integration. In Prolegomena, Kant criticizes Hume as a mathematical judgment. If he realized this Before Kant, all previous knowledge was thought to have to be analytical. However, Kant believes our mathematical knowledge, the first principles of natural science and metaphysics are a priori and inclusive. Kant believes that the unique nature of this knowledge needs to be urgently explained. Therefore, the core question of criticism is to answer this question: "How is it possible to synthesize a priori judgment?"

Coincidence of Malebranche: Philosophical summary of the Garden of Eden: According to Malebranche, Adam should be considered a coincidence philosopher. Philosophy not only derives from heaven, it was actually derived from the occultism of Malebranche. This is to be able to adhere to his contingent belief that Adam was given the special ability to his body, the ability to separate the main part of the brain (position of the soul) from others. Body In the history of philosophy there are at least two answers to this question. Nicholas Malebranche invented an unexpected situation, which is why God is alone in all events. Therefore, God 's involvement allows past events to cause future events. Therefore, past and future events are related as God makes it show this way. However, the unexpected situation has been criticized by the poor God's achievement and its power. In contrast, Gottfried Leibniz devised a pre-established harmony theory to explain the progress of events in the world. God is again the only reason for all events, but God has only one intervention to determine the course of all future events. The pre-established harmony theory is similar to the situation someone arranges thousands of Domino in some way. Until the emergence of humanism in the Renaissance, medieval philosophy was dominated by academicism. Modern philosophy began in France in the 17th century and its philosophy was Rene de Carte, Blaze Pascal and Nicolas Marebranche. Descartes revived the Western philosophy, which was rejected after the Greek and Roman era. His idea about the first philosophy changed the main purpose of philosophical thought and raised some basic questions for foreigners such as Spinoza, Leibniz, Hume, Berkeley and Kant. Many philosophers still stand out from the classical tradition and regard their philosophy as a way of life. The most noteworthy of these are René Descartes, Baruch Spinoza, Nicolas Malebranche and Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. With the rise of the university, the concept of modern philosophy became more prominent. Many respected philosophers since the 18th century have participated in university, teaching and developing their work. Early examples include Immanuel Kant, Johann Gottlieb Fichte, Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph Schelling, and Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel.

February 13, 2016 will be the 250th birthday of British economists, one day we predict that the increase in population will exceed the ability of the earth to support it. His most recent attitude towards his theory is skeptical as he failed to predict the progress of technology that billions of people would be able to get food. Today, however, the impact of climate change is a serious threat to food production, suggesting that Malthus is not completely wrong. Given his birth anniversary that made 2015 the warmest year in history, and one of the strongest El Niño events, we announced an explanation emphasizing that Malthus' theory relates to today's food security did. In briefing, I will explain factors that do not contribute to or threaten food production in future such as biotechnology, increase of natural disaster, water shortage. Our findings suggest that population growth, depletion of natural resources and increased extreme weather phenomena increases the risk of crop failure, thereby increasing food insecurity. Thomas Robert Malthus was born in February 1766 near Guildford, Surrey. His father succeeded at home and accepted Thomas' s education. Malthus then studied at the University of Cambridge and received a master's degree in 1791. In 1793 he became a researcher at Jesus University in Cambridge. In 1805, Malthus became a professor of history and political economy at the University of East India University in Hailey Berry, Hertfordshire until his death. In 1819, Malthus became a member of the Royal Society, and two years later he was appointed a member of the Political Economics Club. In 1824, he was elected as one of the royal family members of the Royal Literature Society. Malthus also co-founded the London Statistics Association in 1834. Thomas Robert Malthus died on 23rd December 1834 Thomas Martas, Thomas Robert Malthus, (13 February 1766, in the UK, near Salidoru Roquery, died on 29th December 1834, near St. Catherine, Bath, Sa Merced, British economists and population Statisticians are known by his theory that population growth tends to outpace food supply and human improvement is impossible without severe reproductive limitation This kind of thinking is often called Malthusianism Malthus was born in a wealthy family, his father was a philosopher influenced by Jean-Jacques Rousseau and a skeptical friend of David Hume, his book Émile (1762) is his It may be the source of a generous idea of ​​Elder Malthus about educating his son.The young Malthus is the most generous until he entered Jesus College in Cambridge in 1784 His time was educated at home, where he studied many subjects, received Latin and Greek awards, and graduated in 1788. That sentence - excess population - reminds me of the philosophical task of Dickens first. He is aiming for Thomas Malthus, the father of zero growth philosophy. Malthus's idea still existed in the lives of British intellectuals at the time. Malthus himself joined the surplus generation nine years ago. But his idea proved to be more durable. Malthus has a well-known view that public demand will be inevitable in the world of economic growth and growth. His "population paper" made a school of idea that it continues to be under the flag of zero population increase and sustainability today as well. The threat of the "population bomb" where my generation lives is a modern reflection of Malthus' assertion that productivity can not catch up with population growth, or can not exceed population growth.

Conflict: Conflict is a case where 12 juries must decide whether the boy is guilty or not, according to the evidence heard by the judge. The boy is convicted of murdering his father and may be sentenced to death. Twelve jurors went to the conference room to talk to each other, and they had the right to vote. The vote moves about in the room, each jury verbally saying "guilty" or "not guilty." Eleven juries voted after the vote was over, one independent jury voted innocent and a major conflict with eleven other jurors occurred. This report is about the movie "12 Angry Men". This movie is about 12 men, a jury of a young man accused of murdering his father. A very obvious large confrontation is a different opinion as to whether a little boy is sinning or not guilty. At the court, all men sit and begin prosecuting and discussing Courtney B. Vance (# 1). He also counted the votes and recorded the number of people and people who voted for guilty or innocence. The informal role of the two jury members belongs to both information providers, Juror 3 and Juror 4. They all offer their own ideas and beliefs to other gentlemen. The jury 3 of the courier's business owner is guilty of the boy and should be sentenced to death In 1997, 12 angry men were renovated. William Friedon director, George Scott, James Gandolfini, Tony Danza, William Peterson, Osi Davis, Hume Kronin, Courtney's remake B. Vance, Amine Muller-Star, Michael Williamson, Edward · James Ormos, Dorian · Hairwood, Jack · Lemmon. In this work, the judge is a woman, four of them are black people, but the majority of the action and conversation of the movie is the same as the original. Modernization includes prohibition of smoking in the jury room, changes in references to income and popular cultural figures, racial-related conversation, and mention by fatal injection rather than electric chair. Reginald Rose's "Twelve Angry Men" shows the power and productivity of the conflict. Likewise, conflict can help us and hinder us. Conflicts based on self and identity and relationships, and conflicting competition and avoidance methods may interfere with collective agreements, but at the same time they induce these 12 angry people. The personal prejudice of many juries is often based on contradictions of relationships and self / identity and continues to impair the vote. The entire process Group of twelve angry men Dynamics In classic twelve angry men in 1957, group dynamics were portrayed by a jury review. Group dynamics focuses on the structure and function of the group and the different kinds of roles played by each role. In this movie, 12 men were gathered in the room and we decided whether the boy was committing the crime of killing the father. There are only a few examples of the conflicts of personality, joint efforts, and the ability of several people to find the truth together. Leadership: There are two main examples of leadership in the movie 'Angry person' . The first one is at the beginning of the movie, the director gathers everyone in the room, sits and assigns numbers. He then discussed the process and rules they would keep and continued to set the first vote. After the first vote, he asked them to discuss the reasons for the balloting method circle one by one.

The 1942 movie "Casablanca" depicts the enclave of World War II, refugees escaped Nazi Europe and pursued a dream to America while using an uninhabited city as a safe haven. The protagonist is Rick Blain played by Humphrey Bogart who owned a nightclub and casino in Morocco uninhabited during the Nazi era. Brian's sole purpose seems to be money and helps you get the necessary immigration documents for those who are going to pay for freedom, so they show arrogance and self-righteousness . For romantic people, Casablanca is a wonderful place in the film starring Ingrid Bergman and Humphrey Bogar in 1942. Actually Casablanca movies are actually filmed in Hollywood's sound field and authentic Casablanca is often overlooked by visitors to the outdoor market in Marrakesh and Fes, the exotic beaches of Essaouira and Tanger. Casablanca is a traveler who wants to experience the present and understand the past with feeling like a locals, not tourists. As Morocco's most populous city, Casablanca, is vast, visitors must try to find hidden details. As you arrive at the water you can see that the mix of sand and style of Casablanca is like Los Angeles. That is why it is worth visiting. In the 1942 movie "Casablanca", Claude Rains' officer, Captain Reynolds, told this in a conversation with Rick Blain played by Humphrey Bogart. The last two lines of the first poem represent his power in Casablanca. After delivering the line, he was called by the assistant of Gestapo 's official major strategist. In 1960's movie 'Sunrise In Campobello', Lui Howe played by Hume Kronin read the poem by Franklin Roosevelt played by Ralph Bellamy. Reading is easy at first at first, some is a joke, but as it continues, neither seems to recognize the importance of this poem to Roosevelt's struggle against his criticisms. For many Westerners, this town is a romantic rhyme represented by Michael Krits' "Casablanca" movie in 1942, a cynical overseas expatriate Hanover in America. Humphrey Bogart (famous quotation in his film is still brilliant and transcendent irony: "Look at me, children!" And "Sam played again" and a selfless Caucasian male (Rick Blaine) at the beginning of World War II at his expense for his beloved Ingrid Bergman (Ilsha) he receives frequent pressures from local governments, but writes illegal letters These letters will help them escape to the United States, but one day Rick's former lover Ingrid Bergman and her husband will appear in his cafe Rick faced a tough challenge that would result in unexpected complications, hurting my heart and eventually making an unbearable decision.

At the beginning of "12 angry people", the judge told the jury: "One person is dead and the life of others is threatened. Perfect judgment reasonable If in doubt, the jury must confirm that the verdict is not guilty, so the confrontation has begun, the man agreed to make a preliminary vote in a total of eleven innocent elections. And these people conflicted and persuaded to fight 11 people. In 1997, 12 angry men were renovated. William Friedon director, George Scott, James Gandolfini, Tony Danza, William Peterson, Osi Davis, Hume Kronin, Courtney's remake B. Vance, Amine Muller-Star, Michael Williamson, Edward · James Ormos, Dorian · Hairwood, Jack · Lemmon. In this work, the judge is a woman, four of them are black people, but the majority of the action and conversation of the movie is the same as the original. Modernization includes prohibition of smoking in the jury room, changes in references to income and popular cultural figures, racial-related conversation, and mention by fatal injection rather than electric chair. In addition to the hope of being a sad accountant of 12 angry male coach Sidney Lumet and Jack Lemmon, the Death Wish movie seems to be a warning story about bending to anger and fear. However, after Lumet withdrew and Lemmon, George C. Scott, and Henry Fonda took over the protagonists, the movie was at risk of being truncated. Finally, Paramount looked to British director Michael Winner who came to Hollywood to make western films and thrillers. "" "" Dirty dozen "and other male action films. It is a great escape. The winner mentioned Mr. Bronson about the script and explained the premise about an ordinary person holding a law. As the winner remembered in his memoirs, "I will never speak a story," Charlie said, "I want to do this." Charlie replied, "No, I would like to rob you." COMM 132 October 2, 2014 Film paper (12 angry people) In the movie, 12 angry people, 12 juries find a young man for the crime of murdering his own father I am at work. In order for a man to fulfill his duties as a jury, it is necessary to unite and reach an agreement to analyze the evidence and testimony of the trial. In other words, whether young people are guilty and whether the defendant is guilty or not guilty will come to an agreement. As an independent group ... "12 angry people" is a classic movie depicting how a determined leader can change the whole crowd. Through devotion, curiosity, and the pursuit of truth, he can persuade a group to guess even 12 people. There are more than 12 different characters in this homosexual group - some of them are leaders, but most of them are not. The most powerful leader in this movie is a white suit architect. From the first vote I am an architect

When used as the basis of religious and natural scientific knowledge, faith has several strengths and weaknesses. To fully analyze these strengths and weaknesses and to determine which is more common it is necessary to distinguish beliefs, religion, and natural science from one another. In the New Merriam-Webster Dictionary, faith is defined as "faith and trust in God" or "loyalty to duty or people" (270), religion is called "organizational belief and worship system" (617) Science is "Knowledge by general scientific method covering general facts or general legal tasks" (650). Given this theme, in order to determine how it functions as a basis for religious and natural scientific knowledge, we must first determine the meaning of faith at the individual level. Faith can be seen in a variety of ways, but usually it is someone's credibility, religion, faith and so on. The English dictionary outlines that faith is "a strong or unwavering belief in something unless there is evidence or evidence in particular". In essence, in this context, faith is a firm and unconditional belief in something. In many aspects of our lives, we can find use of faith as a foundation of knowledge. Whether it is belief in teacher advice, faith in God, or belief in scientific theory, it exists. But what is faith? The definition of belief in the theory of knowledge background is confidence or trust of knowledge seekers, but there is no knowledge with solid evidence. - To provide a reasonable view of the subject, in order to determine how it will serve as a basis for religious and natural scientific knowledge, you must first determine the meaning of belief at the individual level not. Faith can be seen in a variety of ways, but usually it is someone's credibility, religion, faith and so on. In the English dictionary, faith is outlined as "a strong or unwavering belief in something without particular evidence or evidence." Science and religion have always been in conflict. Science is based on observation and can prove it. On the other hand, religion makes discussions analytical and requires faith. Although the foundation may not be very similar. Scientists sometimes call this the order or energy of the universe, which spreads in the world we live in. Religion likes to regard this ultimate reality as a god. This entity can set order in the universe, except that religion is defined as god. - Where did the religion come from? Many people try to answer this question, but there are more questions than answers. This article will focus on the strong criticism of God's existence by two philosophers David Hume and Karl Marx.

In this article, we will consider the natural theological argument proposed by William Paley in 1802. From the design, Paley proposed a discussion aimed at showing clear and obvious reasons why people should believe God through the unique characteristics of the world. Second, criticism of David Hume's argument is more important than criticism by other philosophers, and even before Darwin's theory emerges, it should be persuaded. . Before considering Hume 's highly reliable objections to Perry' s theoretical argument about the existence of God, it is necessary to evaluate the fundamental aspects of the sco - poster. Paley's central metaphor in his argument is a clock. In his reasoning, nature can be seen as a clock designed to be known to have a clear manufacturer. Paley claims that the natural world (and the universe) can really be regarded as a clock, even if people do not understand their work and mechanism, and even understand the actual watch. One of the traditional themes of natural theology is the existence of God, one of which is discussion from design and theoretical arguments. Discussion is that the existence of God can be proved by an obvious design in the complexity of the world. EncyclopædiaBritannica says, "This is most popular for the most accessible theoretical reason ... it deduces sacred designers and determines the evidence of design in nature.The coherent facts as a whole In this view, the same functional system also shows the wisdom of God behind it. " McCloskey has many different kinds of arguments about the existence of God. Every discussion has a concept about God. Each discussion takes a different approach. I will focus on cosmology and objective arguments. As we all know, the scopostauri is derived from a sacred argument from order in the universe to the existence of God (1). In the order of the universe created by wise existence, they think it is ... the claim of existence of God is truth, and reason is true. In philosophical discussion, any description is less important or controversial. But this is the position I proposed in this article. A reasonable and true equation is the core of the discussion I am studying here, which is an ontological argument against the existence of God. There are several versions of ontological arguments about the existence of God.

If all of my works have a theme, that is about credibility and self expression. This is really important for you in a sense. The whole process is to clarify the concept of internal need. Bernard Williams in 2002 was a state of mind before human behavior. One of the provinces is "motivation". We say that we must have motivation to take action. David Hume, Donald Davidson, and Harry Frankfurt all believe that they are motivated and want it. Reason has many functions. It has theoretical functions (such as science) and practical functions. We are interested in practical functions, that is to say practicing in the sense of reasonable decision (with emotion and desire) in terms of human behavior and choice. However, a practical function can be understood as having two parts - a "purposeful" function and an ethical function. Kant does not equate moral reasons with the computational rationality of Utilitarians or egoists, as you should now know. But he also did not condemn the actual reason for this. It is a very important place in human life. However, average and target calculations must be supported by various kinds of reasoning - moral reasoning I agree that morality must be first defined. However, the concept of "the selection itself has no practical meaning unless people try to achieve some ideal outcome" is controversial. Several things should be considered good. For example, for some reason, it will not be the only value. If that actual result is to understand the actual result, it is because we need to assume the value of rationality first. So, which goals are inherently "moral" in particular, and which goals are not? This is another tricky philosophical issue that has caused various academic discussions so far. Despite controversy, most people tend to think that every coherent concept that seems to be "moral" behavior must develop with some sort of final social interaction. Actual subjects deny this unique constructivism, institutional dependence, and rationality only when some of their normative self-concepts have a position (major structure). As an agent, we are forced to keep this position practical. It is to maintain something consistently in front of us. There are few reasons to believe that the essence of our relationship and our reasons are completely transparent. The second argument was introduced to deal with cases of deliberate acts that seemed to involve agents who did not participate in principle management procedures to take account of these identities. It is an act. In response to Raz's rapid, opaque and automated behavior example, I claim that its cause has not been elucidated in either normative or motivational diversity yet.

Oliver Cromwell is a hero or a villain. I think Oliver Cromwell is a hero. He is kind, ambitious and hopes Britain will do its best without corruption or unfair methods. He thought that Charles would not do the right thing, so he worked hard and executed him. Oliver Cromwell was a parliamentary member (parliamentarian), opposed to King Charles and his way, so he worked hard and executed the king. After that, he won the position of the king, but he refused, he is a guardian of the country. In January 1649, Charles I was executed and his death sentence was signed by Oliver Cromwell. Cromwell became the new ruler of England and under his rule he achieved several controversial outcomes. In this article, I will evaluate various actions using modern perspectives, quotes, and other materials as to whether these actions make him a hero or a bad guy. One of Cromwell 's main assets is the new model army he used to defeat the king' s army. Cromwell did good and evil as a military leader and had different opinions on whether he and his army as a whole were heroes or evils. Several historians believe that the new model forces are disciplined and efficient with outstanding founders and military leaders. Unlike the king's army, it has only a powerful generals, not a great aristocrat. This may be the reason for its success, but there are people who say that it also has the hands of God. The purpose of this article is to answer the long-awaited question about one of the most controversial people in British history. Is Oliver Cromwell a hero or a villain? The answer is difficult to clarify, even for scholars who have different opinions and have been discussing him for centuries. Cromwell has been seen as a demon, fanatics, hero, and the incarnation of God (1999, BBC News). For historians like Thomas Carlyle and Samuel Rosengardner, Oliver Cromwell is a hero of freedom, for others like David Hume and Christopher Hill he is a murder dictator. But the vision which controversial this figure is still in our 10 years. In 2002, the BBC conducted a poll in the UK and was elected as one of the top ten British in history. But who is right? What is the reasonable evaluation of today's Cromwell? Please consider all these important points to make a reasonable view of this controversial diagram

Introduction In this article we will explore the so-called Hugh's theory. Then I will continue to discuss the moral implications of HTR over incompatibility between moral absoluteism and the concept of universalism. Then a potential Korsgaardian response to Hume will be made. If you want to accept the position of HTR or Korsgaard, the question of whether it is reasonable not to do anything will cause some problems. "Moral" is a euphemism of the church against sexual impurities. Usually it means unethical behavior regardless of morality. In the outside world, unethical behavior may include lying, fraud, theft, killing, abuse, and various levels of sexual activity. Immoral behavior depends on the value system of the person you are talking about. And some value systems believe that most forms of sexual behavior are completely ethical. In the church, this term is limited to sexual behavior in particular, and it restricts discussion of other behavioral ethics. Everything that is contrary to established etiquette or custom is immoral. Unethical behavior and doctrine are not necessarily sinful. Conversely, progress in thinking and action is immoral until the majority changes. For this reason, the most important thing is to protect unethical behavior from attacks by people who do not have standards other than customary criteria. Religion and virtue Kill and kill. This is correct as the law is not an unethical decision maker. This behavior is not immoral, but stealing is illegal, so this person may be imprisoned. It is immoral to tell a lie, but there is no law against lying. The reason for the law is to prevent confusion, but the reason for the rise of superheroes is due to confusion. In Justice League's comic show, Wonder Woman left his hometown next to the other members of Justice League.

In the absence of God, the claim of evil was a controversial issue in the discussion of religious philosophy. This question is trying to explain how some evil in the world allows the evil of the world to happen when traditional gods have the ability to block these events, knowledge, and ability. But in order to delve into this particular discussion, we must first decide what qualities the traditional God should have. The god of "traditional" monotheism as found in Judaism - Christian religion should be omnipotent, omniscient, and omnidirectional. The problem of evil in philosophy What is the classic "evil problem" ("three difficulties") in the Western philosophy / theological tradition? The problem of evil is how to harmonize the existence of evil with omnipotence, omniscience, and the presence of the Almighty God. Greek philosopher Epicuras detailed this trilemma in ancient times and summarized it in modern David Hume. Epicuras advocates a trilemma to counter the concept of almighty The problem of evil has two branches. Evil logic problem (LPOE) seeks to prove that the existence of evil contradicts the existence of omnipotence and omnipotent existence. The evidence evidence question (EPOE) tries to prove that the existence of an amount or kind of evil contradicts the existence of somewhat effective and benevolent entity. Of course, not all Gods are considered omnipotent, omnipotent, or either. Many gods are morally defective, positive evil, or simply indifferent, and not omnipotent. The evil logical matter does not apply to these gods, but evidence of evil evidence still holds true. This is consistent with the idea of ​​evil. That is, there are defective evil, irrelevant, or totipotent entities that are compatible with reality and the existence of omnipotent and omnipotent entities is not

Whether humans really have free will or whether their lives are completely decided is decided. This free will problem continues to be a place of philosophical debate forever. Many great philosophers tried to answer this question, but none of them answered as much as Immanuel Kant. He put the foundation of his argument in the foreword of the future metaphysics. In response to David Hume 's skepticism, Kant wrote this method, so Kant made a more resolute attempt to metaphysics. Thus, Kant 's irrationalism in its formulation was a combination of sentimentalism and Kant' s non conceptualism applicable to Kant 's practical agent theory. Or, in other words, for Kant, free choice and autonomy will come not only from the minds of human being but also from the mind, understanding or intelligence, and as long as they come from the human mind, they can come directly from the heart, not indirectly It is as much as possible. Concept, conscious consideration, mediation by propositional reasoning or reasoning Reasonable human condition 3, deep freedom and real people: metaphysical studies, Section 3.3 - Practice - Freedom of Life: Kant non-intellectualism Kant believes that there are no exceptions in the responsibility of not lying for two main reasons. Kant believes that human beings include dignity and essential value, free will and moral behavior. The reason why Kant does not tell a lie is based on his view on the intrinsic value of man and the free will. The first is about how the lies will affect ourselves and the second reason is about how the lies will affect others. First, Kant believes that when people tell a lie they are violating their dignity and intrinsic value (Rachels & Rachels, 2011, pp. 137-138). A lie conflicts with his moral, moral, and essential values. Furthermore, lying is likely to be influenced by liars, so it may hinder the ability to make reasonable choices about free will. Kant opened the third part by defining the will as the reason for our action. Kant believes that having will and reason is one thing, and having free will mean having the will to be influenced by external forces. This is a negative definition of freedom - we are telling us that freedom is freedom determined by foreign powers. But Kant also advocates a positive definition of freedom. Kant believes that free will give him certain laws - it sets its own purpose and has special causal power to achieve them. Free will is the intention that ordinary natural laws can achieve their actions in a different way than doing things. According to Kant, law is necessary to act. Actions not based on law are arbitrary, and we can not call motivation. Because free will is not only driven by external forces, external forces will not provide laws for free will.

This is one of the most difficult tasks that anyone can face and that can have very serious consequences for a particular culture. Presenting an opinion unrelated to most people's opinion can be a terrible experience, but it is also a very refreshing experience. The "silence spiral" theory created by Elizabeth Noelle-Neumann explains why people are afraid to express themselves when people's opinions contradict the opinions of most people. Opinion She discusses the research and findings that she thinks is not enough to explain his research and findings and her theory is included in the spiral of silence theory. This magazine is a study to explain important variables related to the theory of silence theory by Elizabeth Noel Neumann and states that the fear of isolation is the reason why they can not express what they want. They are a minority. The authors decided to test based on this theory in the context of an open discussion that focused on positive behavioral policies. They reviewed the selected data of 217 adults randomly selected in October 1998. And they show that they were afraid of isolation. It shows that fear of isolation hinders public opinion of ethnic minorities. Demographics, the importance of media use, and problems also predict the desire to express an opinion on controversial voting. In recent years, the referendum has decided to abolish the aggressive action laws and policies promulgated in the 1960s and 1970s, and to secure opportunities to reduce race and gender. According to the German political scholar Elizabeth Noel - Neumann political science and mass communication theory known as the "silent spiral" theory, people believe that individuals are afraid of isolation. This isolated fear arises from the idea that social groups and societies can be quarantined by members' opinions, ignoring or excluding members, so that people can keep silence rather than expressing their opinions It is. It is not the case when a person becomes a member of Hourtimenow.com. Everyone who is positive and contributing welcomes the expression of his opinion. Entrepreneurs set up a new social network for blacks around the world and discuss the original issues of racial discrimination that are often prohibited in other social networks Silent spiral is an innovative paradox theory developed by Elizabeth Noel-Neumann. Noelle-Neumann believed that public opinion is an important force that determines people's decisions, so it followed the paths of past philosophers Locke, Hume, Rousseau, Goethe, James Madison. Noelle-Neumann accused silence for fear of isolation. In other words, people who think they belong to a minority group may be silent as they are afraid that most people will be laughed. The expression "silent spiral" refers to the tendency to keep silence when people think that people's opinion is a minority. The model shows that the pressure on hiding their views is growing as they think they are minorities. This is the theory of political science and the media, first afraid of retaliation and isolation, we upgrade from there.

Hedonists do anything to get their happiness. Regardless of the price, hedonists will buy it for their own enjoyment. They also believe that happiness is the only benefit in life and that pain is the only evil. Therefore, they want to maximize their happiness and minimize pain in their lives. Hedonists believe it is a high reputation when they show off their brand and expensive ones. Sometimes they only buy things without knowing whether it is useful or not. Hedonism is now a habit, and even a lifestyle. In philosophy, there is an interesting theme called hedonism. "Happiness" which is the joy of Greek (hdon) is the theory that happiness or happiness is the greatest concern and is the main objective of human life. It refers to a series of theories about what is good for humans and the motivation to make humans act in their own way. There are many thought experiments in hedonism. Among many things, one of the interesting experiments I found is The Experience Machine. "Experience Machine" created by philosopher Robert Nozick in his work "Anarchy", "Country", "Utopia" is a beautiful thinking experiment for the world of virtual reality. The term "hedonism" means the happiness theory and happiness at the highest level of life. Hedonism is the doctrine that happiness is the only benefit. (Bank) The criminal justice system has two forms of hedonism, psychological hedonism and moral hedonism. Moral hedonism means not just seeking happiness, but also seeking happiness. Because happiness itself is a good thing. (Bank) Psychological hedonism is about people who pursue happiness and enjoyment of life, to get happiness and to avoid suffering. (Bank) For years, philosophers have tried to distinguish between psychological hedonism and moral hedonism. What psychological hedonism is necessary? When dealing with psychological hedonism, the motive of a criminal justice expert is to maximize his or her happiness and suffering. They pay attention to the moral values ​​in our daily life. Hedonism played a role in understanding people's behavior. According to the bank's explanation, only happiness is worth the search and happiness is a good thing. Everyone is seeking happiness in various ways. The word "hedonism" comes from the "happiness" of ancient Greek. Psychological or motivated hedonism insists that only happiness or pain motivates us. Moral or evaluation hedonism insists that only happiness has value or value and that only pain or dissatisfaction diminishes or opposes value. Jeremy Bentham claims psychological and moral hedonism using the first two sentences of his book "Introduction to moral and legislative principles". Only governance can point out what we have to do and we can decide what we are about to do. The controversy about hedonism was also a feature for centuries before Bentham and continued after him. Other major contributors to the hedonistic debate are Plato, Aristotle, Epicuras, Aquinas, Butler, Hume, Mill, Nietzsche, Brentano, Sidgwick, Moore, Ross, Broad, Lyle, Tiszam

As we normally understand, I do not believe in evil. What we think about evil is that God has misused the good given. Since the soul has to experience himself as a specific thing, we have even experience of being regarded as evil. In other words, in this relative situation, you can not get hot without cold, short stature can not be high, you can not live without what you do not have. The problem of evil in philosophy What is the classic "evil problem" ("three difficulties") in the Western philosophy / theological tradition? The problem of evil is how to harmonize the existence of evil with omnipotence, omniscience, and the presence of the Almighty God. Greek philosopher Epicuras detailed this trilemma in ancient times and summarized it in modern David Hume. Epicuras advocates a trilemma to counter the concept of almighty The problem of evil has two branches. Evil logic problem (LPOE) seeks to prove that the existence of evil contradicts the existence of omnipotence and omnipotent existence. The evidence evidence question (EPOE) tries to prove that the existence of an amount or kind of evil contradicts the existence of somewhat effective and benevolent entity. Of course, not all Gods are considered omnipotent, omnipotent, or either. Many gods are morally defective, positive evil, simply indifferent, and not omnipotent. The evil logical matter does not apply to these gods, but evidence of evil evidence still holds true. This is consistent with the idea of ​​evil. That is, there are defective evil, irrelevant, or totipotent entities compatible with reality and the existence of omnipotent and omnipotent entities is not. The problem of evil can be formulated in various ways. Indeed, the 'problem' pointing to evil may be more accurate. Recipes are interpreted as logical problems. Regarding the logic of evil, it is claimed that these two arguments, (1) that Almighty and Almighty God exists, and (2) the existence of evil is logically incompatible. Since evil exists on the surface, it is claimed that God (usually understood to be omnipotent and omnipotent) does not exist. In the latter part of the 20th century, logical arguments became dominant. But by the end of the century religious philosophers generally believed that the logic was rebutted. One of the reasons is that there must be hidden or unspecified assumptions as claims (1) and (2) are not clearly contradictory. But what is that?

Arevalo 1 Philosophy of Michael Arevalo / Extra Credit 02-03-02 Evil Issue The evil question points to the phrase "no one will make a bad thing after this life and death". The immediate problem is whether the description is correct or not. Depending on how you defined the terms "good" and "person", this statement may be interpreted as inaccurate or accurate. First of all we have to define the words "good" and "human". The problem of evil in philosophy What is the classic "evil problem" ("three difficulties") in the Western philosophy / theological tradition? The problem of evil is how to harmonize the existence of evil with omnipotence, omniscience, and the presence of the Almighty God. Greek philosopher Epicuras detailed this trilemma in ancient times and summarized it in modern David Hume. Epicuras advocates a trilemma to counter the concept of almighty The problem of evil has two branches. Evil logic problem (LPOE) seeks to prove that the existence of evil contradicts the existence of omnipotence and omnipotent existence. The evidence evidence question (EPOE) tries to prove that the existence of an amount or kind of evil contradicts the existence of somewhat effective and benevolent entity. Of course, not all Gods are considered omnipotent, omnipotent, or either. Many gods are morally defective, positive evil, simply indifferent, and not omnipotent. The evil logical matter does not apply to these gods, but evidence of evil evidence still holds true. This is consistent with the idea of ​​evil. That is, there are defective evil, irrelevant, or totipotent entities compatible with reality and the existence of omnipotent and omnipotent entities is not. The problem of evil can be formulated in various ways. Indeed, the 'problem' pointing to evil may be more accurate. Recipes are interpreted as logical problems. Regarding the logic of evil, it is claimed that these two arguments, (1) that Almighty and Almighty God exists, and (2) the existence of evil is logically incompatible. Since evil exists on the surface, it is claimed that God (usually understood to be omnipotent and omnipotent) does not exist. In the latter part of the 20th century, logical arguments became dominant. But by the end of the century religious philosophers generally believed that the logic was rebutted. One of the reasons is that there must be hidden or unspecified assumptions as claims (1) and (2) are not clearly contradictory. But what is that?

Enlightenment has brought new ideas and messages to society dominated by dominant power: the church. In these dark times, the ultimate authority over people dominated their powerful 'hint' power beyond their religious doctrine and their national leaders. For centuries, as the world's largest and wealthiest organization, the church has the power to oppress free thinkers. In front of the mass communication, most educated literate people were Christian monks who managed information mainly about religious texts and handed the selected information to ignorant masses. Religious tolerance: I am skeptical about religious facilities, but I think many enlightenment thinkers should freely worship according to their own wishes. "The intellectuals of enlightenment was energetically requesting to restrict the political power of organized religion to contain the intolerance of religious war," Abnerz said. Freedom: tolerance to the religion of the Illuminati is related to individual freedom to emphasis. This concept considers that God and nature give fundamental rights to all human beings and that humans should be able to act freely without being limited by oppression. "These philosophers highlight that the government does not have authority over individual conscience," Abernethy explained. "Individuals have rights, everyone is equal, and legitimate political power is based on people's consent, and it is mandatory to express the will of people." Enlightenment thinkers oppose superstition. An enlighten thinker cooperated with the enlightened tyrant, the enlightened ruler of the absolute, who tried to force some new ideas about the government to be carried out. Enlightenment has great influence on European culture, politics and government. Beginning in the 17th century, it was a philosopher Francis Bacon (1562-1626), Baruch Spinoza (1632-1677), John Rock (1632-1704), Pierre Vail (1647-1706), Voltaire (1694-1778) It was started by. , Francis Hutchin, (1694-1746), David Hume (1711-1776) and physicist Isaac Newton (1643-1727). The prince often supports and develops these figures, and even attempts to apply their government concepts to so-called enlightened absoluteism. The scientific revolution is closely related to enlightenment, as its discovery reverses many traditional notions and introduces a new view on the state of nature and humanity.

Times, Sunday Times (2014) Times, Sunday Times (2011) Times literature supplement (2013) Times, Sunday Times (2010) Times, Sunday Times (2013) Times, Sunday Times (2007) Times, Sunday Thames Newspaper (2013) Times , "Sunday Times" (2008) Today's Christianity (2000) This is a reorganization, what political utilityism demands exceeds the fundamental reform requirement. Times, Sunday Times (2014) It is important to note that this practical definition definitely narrows its scope. It should not be practical about the belief that the possibility of being confirmed or forged by facts. The belief that it is raining outside should not be evaluated based on the actual results of its authenticity. Even if rain spoiled my day, it does not mean that people should be "practical", but chooses to choose to believe that the weather is very luxurious. Conversely, if pragmatism is maintained, the belief in the process is beyond what can actually be tested. These beliefs are philosophers' so-called metaphysical beliefs, that is, beliefs beyond the material world. The motivation for a practical approach is that the essence of the discussion can not be perfectly captured from its structure. Contrary to the structural definition of parameters, practical definitions attract the function of parameters. Different interpretations of the purpose of the service demonstration, the definition of the discussion is different. The following practical definitions require the use of discussion as a tool for reasonable persuasion (for the definition of arguments to make such assertions, see Johnson 2000, p.168; Walton 1996, p.18ff; Hitchcock 2007, p.105ff). The practical definition of the novel is often related to the name of Searle and Searle is certainly its most important supporter. Hume secretly defended the novel theory of a practical story. More generally, whenever a public representative is a fictitious person, people associate them with practical features. Because it can not be a false statement or a false statement only by handling sentences in this way. Even so, the definition of the novel of words that pretend to be Searle's speech (1979: 58-75) is undoubtedly the most important and influential contemporary of differences in facts / novels in the field of narrative stories It is one practical analysis.

Movie Casablanca is always an American classic. Americans rated it as a high quality movie for a while, defined the classics, and Casablanca is still the top movie in America. Director Michael Curtis showed up World War II in the family and used this setting to divert the idea. The famous Humphrey Bogart, Ingrid Bergman, Paul Henleid combine the movie with the purpose and theme of the story with complicated triangular relationship love. Casablanca shows liberal criticism through the war rebellion environment in his hometown, the nationalist view, and suffering to true love. Casablanca, the name of the city in northern Morocco, is also one of the most highly respected films in the 20th century. Casablanca was released during World War II in 1942. It was an epic story that raised the limit of prewar movies. It is basically a story of two lovers who meet again in various circumstances of the world devastated by war. There are actors that play a wonderful performance like Humphrey Bogart, Ingrid Bergman, Paul Henry (IDBM). Casablanca discovered Humphrey Bogart's character Rick, her and her husband Victor who once owned the bar in Casablanca. Run away from the German together. In the moral struggle, Rick has to make an important choice in spiritual and global conflict. In the 1942 movie "Casablanca", Claude Rains' officer, Captain Reynolds, told this in a conversation with Rick Blain played by Humphrey Bogart. The last two lines of the first poem represent his power in Casablanca. After delivering the line, he was called by the assistant of Gestapo 's official major strategist. In 1960's movie 'Sunrise In Campobello', Lui Howe played by Hume Kronin read the poem by Franklin Roosevelt played by Ralph Bellamy. Reading is easy at first at first, some is a joke, but as it continues, neither seems to recognize the importance of this poem to Roosevelt's struggle against his criticisms. The Casablanca conference announced the so-called "Casablanca Declaration" at a federation meeting held in Casablanca, Morocco, from 14th January to 23rd January 1943. Churchill, Franklin D. Roosevelt and Charles de Gaulle attended the meeting. Joseph Stalin made a speech for the necessary reasons to participate in the Sterling Rard crisis of the Soviet Union. In Casablanca, the Allied forces continued the war and made a unified promise to pass the Axis' Unconditional Surrender. However, in private, Churchill did not completely agree with the theory of "unconditional surrender". They were surprised when Franklin Roosevelt announced an alliance agreement with the world.

Influence of George Berkeley George Berkeley (1685-1753) is a pastoralist and a philosopher of Ireland at Trinity College, Ireland, where he completed a famous work on unimportant importance (believe everything) They are all substance recognition and exist only if perceived. Coleridge himself acknowledged the influence of Berkeley on his work, especially his poem "This Lime Tree Pavilion" and wrote a letter to Robert Sauce in July 1797. The first poem is accompanied by the following comment: "You remember, I am a Berklein." We can see the impact of Berkeley. George Berkeley is one of the three most famous British experiences. (The other two are John Locke and David Hume.) Berkeley presented his early visual work (an article on new visual theory, 1709) and metaphysics (a paper on the principle of human knowledge, 1710; between Hilas and Filonas Dialog, 1713). Berkeley 's empirical vision theory challenges the current distance vision standards, which argues that it requires implicit geometric calculations. His alternative account focuses on visual and tactile objects. Berkeley believes that visual recognition of distance is explained by the interrelationship between vision and tactility. This association method eliminates the attractiveness of geometric computation and explains the illusion of monocular view and moon that plagued the geometric explanation. I will calculate. Berkeley's 1709 publication only shows the beginning of the extreme idealistic view advocated by George Berkeley. Although Berkeley's view seemed unlikely at first at first, the idealistic theory he claimed was the only theory to avoid skepticism and dictatorship, it is difficult to give up, and ultimately the real meaning It was logical. Four years after publishing "Transfer of a thesis to a new visual theory", Berkeley revealed the most important philosophical work among his careers. Bishop of the 18th century philosopher George Berkeley showed a similar view in his idealistic theory. Berkeley said that the reality is equivalent to a psychological image - our spiritual image is not the copies of other material reality, but the reality itself. But Berkeley has a distinct difference between the image that he believes to make up the outside world and the image of personal imagination. According to Berkeley, in the modern sense only the latter is considered a "psychological image". Soon after Descartes came to George Berkeley. Berkeley accused the view of the realist. For Berkeley, the presence of important things (like trees) is meaningless. Presence can come to us only through thinking (not a physical experience), thinking must exist in assimilation of thought. The material purpose is deceiving, its essence is not meat, it is the ability to change importance. If the idea is not assimilated into thinking, it does not exist. Therefore, he recognized the Latin phrase esse percepi:.

Tassius is a Roman senator and writer and lives between 56 and 117 years old. He was born in a modern town of Gaul, now France. He has a wealthy father, and his family keeps horses. In the process of growth, Tasius likes outdoor activities and likes hunting as entertainment. When he attended school he studied rhetoric. Tasius friend Pliny Youngor also studied rhetoric. This will help Tassius engage in legal and political careers. Tashius became an ancient man, later became a Roman official, later became a senator. First, I will look at Tasius's "history". Tassius is an example of a writer and knows most of the important information in his life, but few missing parts. Tacitus is not born, even his birthday is not. "By calculating the age at which he may be in several offices would give 55 AD or Tacitus' birth date." Also I am not sure what his name is. The manuscript called it Gaio Cornelius Tacitus. Tashitus was born in northern Italy and said that he took office under Vespian, but when he was 77 he married daughter of General Rome Agricola and became a consular in 1988. His work shows clear prejudic bias, and his education in his writing suggests that he is likely to come from a wealthy and powerful family. Classic pieces of essay.com/authors are unknown; they lack data in their lives. Are these details considered reliable? Review of the author's classic works is not known; there is a lack of data in their lives. Are these details considered reliable? This year may be the 1000th anniversary of the death of Publius Cornelius Tacitus. The year of his death was a bit confusing - a historian insisted on publicity in 118, but others raised 120 AD - but his meaning should almost be contradictory. Tacitus's Annals and Histories were greatly affected from Machiavelli and Montaigne to Edward Gibbon and David Hume. In the 20th century, the Nazis caught the explanation of the German ancient Germanic german, Robert Graves was his famous Claudius. Claudius) explores historical stories.

Morality is a rule stipulating which actions are correct and which actions are wrong. Morality can be applied to the whole society or personal beliefs. Sometimes morality can be gathered from stories and experiences People who began to tell lies must tell others to look like they have told a lie. Sooner or later they will annoy him. - From "Monkey and Dolphin" It shows a bad trend of using a friend who is suffering. - From "Bulls and Goats" Even if you say the truth, you will not believe liars. - From 'Shepherd's Boy and Wolf' People who think they are not mine are just ridiculous. - From "crow and crow" All these different stories provide a good moral example, each ethics includes important ethics and important learning experiences. It is an example of morality. (Unknown) Acquired on October 25, 2018 from https://examples.yourdictionary.com/examples-of-morals.html Examples: - There are many examples where we are seeing the worldwide use of ethical universalism. Regardless of your gender, the most common example of moral universalism is equality in the workplace. This is the most common example of moral universalism when the world's ethics and morals are used without hesitation in all countries. Racism is a way of judging the morality or culture of a particular place, country, or organization based on standards established by specific individuals, groups, or countries. This technique is very narrow and not widely accepted. Ethnocentricism is mainly considered to be subtle and obvious in that way. There are many possible ways to evaluate ethical issues. In most cases, people tend to consider ethical issues from a specific perspective. For example, the moral perspective of a person may be based on rules, or focus on the possible outcome of a particular moral choice, or from a person's intuition or conscience. Here are some ethical ways proposed by philosophers: Is there a correct way of action in all or in most cases? If so, can we know what it is? This is a standard question of the entrance college ethics course. Usually by studying how great philosophers (Aristotle, Kant, Mill, Hume etc) think about this problem for analysis Many philosophers consider intrinsic value to be indispensable to various moral judgments. For example, according to the basic form of resultantism, whether an action is morally correct or incorrect depends on whether the outcome is inherently superior to any other actions that can be performed in such a situation Only relevant. Many other theories also believe that correct or erroneous practices are related at least in part to the intrinsic value of the results of actions that can be taken. In addition, as is generally believed, if morally responsible is a function of human correctness or error, the intrinsic value also seems to be related to the judgment of responsibility. Finally, the judgment of moral virtue and vice is also thought that virtue is a good thing and bad is a bad thing, so it will lead to problems of intrinsic value, in a way closely related to this value It is done.

(Diversity of people), culture (cultural diversity), sexual orientation (gender diversity), gender (diversity of gender), and so on, diversity, difference, differences among people. Diversity is to be defined for people's acceptance, tolerance and emphasis on differences in terms of physical and mental abilities, income, race, culture, age, class, race, sex, religion, education I can. By understanding the concept of 'diversity' let's think about its impact and the challenge to society. Decades ago, most of the communities were of nearly the same quality, and the organization consisted of individuals with similar training and experience. Many complex factors have contributed to these patterns of change. It is important to understand the diversity of possible interruption group operating modes, or vice versa, which is the source of strength within the system, unity and evolution. Empirical studies have shown that diversity results in catastrophic consequences and expected benefits. A similar attraction paradigm (homosexual hatred) assumes that diversity brings about communication between group members and inter-group competition / interrelations. On the other hand, the value diversity hypothesis assumes that members of different groups increase social development and self-awareness. In society, diversity is rising. However, despite all its advantages, it can cause major challenges. Some of the diversity challenges are as follows. Finally, the word of John Hume (1998 Nobel Peace Prize winner) says, "The difference is the essence of man, the difference is the birth accident, so it will not be a source of hatred or conflict. The answer is to respect it The most fundamental principle of peace is to respect diversity. " Starting from the definition of diversity, comparing the religious diversity of the country raises many challenges. Various methods, diversity concepts, social scientists, ethnic minority scales (shared and / or absolute quantity); in society's influential civil society, such as the degree of social division into different groups The extent of influence of more minorities (and the extent to which one or more groups dominate society). Each of these methods can also be applied to the study of religious diversity. Diversity is good as it is rewarding, sharpened, and reflects human reality. The diversity of ideas is particularly superior especially in the information economy. Medium shows its diversity every day, is unique, prominent and elaborate. Everything is going well. The media seems to welcome all of us "collapsed masses" to their shores. But does it look like moderate diversity? Last year, the situation may cause significant changes, but the use of these data, like the stadium figure, we can see it compared to the US population, in the middle, At least in terms of education, it is very diverse, income and age. This is not necessarily a good thing or a bad thing, but these statistics from the point of view of a very interesting political spectrum. The challenge of using the word "diversity" as an indicator of the lack of "diversity" is that it misleads itself. Most societies are centered around a common set of ideal and moral leadership, but we are all unique people with different backgrounds. This is because we are angry & I, senior executives such as Apple's senior human resources manager Dennis Young Smith etc. D is a strong opposition blue eyes male, when speaking of many white people, diversity It means that there is. The objection can not make her statement about, but due to the wrong use of the word, the word is throughout the business community as a whole. She is technically correct, so diversity is not just women and color people. Diversity is far beyond these communities

I saw the most strange thing when I saw Elvis running on the highway on Saturday night. There is an aged blue Cadillac on one side of the road. It was when I saw it when I passed by. From my eyes, it is him. King Elvis Presley is kicking his rusty Cadillac flat tire. I swear this is him. He burned and the hair was smooth, so when he left his eyes I swore he was on that lips. When I remembered that night, I thought it was really him or I really wanted it. The story of Elvis Presley's wonderful life started on January 8, 1935. Elvis · Aaron · Presley was born in Vernon and Gladys · Presley in Miss Tupper. Luo's 2 bedroom house. His twin brother, Jess Galleon, who died grew up from Elvis as a child. He and his parents moved to Memphis, Tennessee in 1948, and in 1953 Elvis graduated there from Hume 's High School. In 1954, Elvis started his career in Memphis's legendary San Record brand. At the end of 1955, his recording contract was sold to RCA Victor. By 1956, he was an international sensation. That sound and style uniquely combines his diverse musical influences, blurred and challenged the social and ethnic barriers of that era, and created a new era of American music and pop culture. Elvis Presley was born in Tupelo, Mississippi, USA on January 8, 1935. He is an American actor and singer. He is also known as the most important cultural symbol of the 20th century. Elvis Presley began his musical career in 1954. Presley's first RCA single "Heartbreak Hotel" was released in January 1956. Elvis Presley 's first movie was "Love Me Tender" in 1956. His most popular is "The King of Rocks". Read Elvis Presley quotes Elvis Presley was born on Gladys Love Presley (née Smith) in Tupelo, Michigan on January 8, 1935, and his father, Vernon Elvis Presley, has created a shotgun room for two rooms. Jesse Gallon Presley, his identical twin brother, was sent 35 minutes before his death. Presley has a close relationship with his parents and has a particularly close relationship with his mother. The family attended the church of God's assembly where he found his first musical inspiration. On his mother's side, Presley's ancestors were Scottish Irish and French Norman. Gladys and other families clearly believe that her great-grandmother morning pigeon is Cherokee; the biography of Elaine Dundy supports this idea, but at least one pedigree researcher in many ways I asked a question. Vernon's ancestry was German or Scottish. Gladys is regarded as a family member from relatives and friends.

Why did design theory fail? Due to its shortcomings the design theory failed due to the lack of de facto and substantial evidence to prove the argument. It presents many ideas and ideas, but they are not reasonable; the only real fact is that you have to trust them. I think that it is correct to criticize the evidence that it did not oppose the existence theory of God. The main philosopher who criticized and opposed the Teleogical Argument was David Hume. These arguments, advocated by Philo, support the reasons why design arguments have failed. Through his role, Cleanthes, David Hughes introduced a debate that the nature and existence of God can be proved by inference based on observations of the universe. Cleanthes is trying to prove this with his "design theory". And by witnessing the natural beauty and order, complexity and complexity of the universe, we can safely deduce that our best designers have created One of the traditional themes of natural theology is the existence of God, one of which is discussion from design and theoretical arguments. Discussion is that the existence of God can be proved by an obvious design in the complexity of the world. EncyclopædiaBritannica says, "This is most popular for the most accessible theoretical reason ... it deduces sacred designers and determines the evidence of design in nature.The coherent facts as a whole In this view, the same functional system also shows the wisdom of God behind it. " Design controversy is an empirical argument against the existence of God. These arguments are made by inferring the existence of God as the best interpretation of these features, trying to identify the various empirical features of the world which usually (but not always) constitute the evidence of intelligent design. Because the concept of design and purpose is closely related, design argument is also called a theoretical argument and includes "terror", "target", or "purpose" in Greek. Discussion of design is at the center of the concept of intelligent design movement. There are many different types of design parameters that differ not only from the evidence used but also from their logical parameter structure. Design arguments are divided into analogy, induction and inductive (inferred best interpretation) are typical. All these arguments are trying to explain intuitive logic so that everyone can form their commonsense beliefs in design and apply this logic to the natural order.

Enlightenment awareness raising in the 18th century and politician enlightenment was an exciting historical era. For the first time since ancient Greece, reason and logic are the center of the most elaborate social thinking. The discovery and understanding of the replaced religion as an impulsive ideal of this age, and the high social scene in Europe, intense debate about these new ideas still exist. French playwright named after pseudonvoltel is the most famous and controversial enlightenment writer. Progress of Enlightenment With the arrival of 1900, many changes are taking place. New leaders, government styles, and new ideas have just begun. The focus of Age of Enlightenment was based on reason, rationalism, and the concept of "unavoidable progress". Enlightenment was driven by Kant, Bulgaria, Thomas Jefferson, Isaac Newton, François Marie Aduwe Voltaire, Thomas Hobbes, and other wonderful people. - The main reason for enlightenment is the scientific revolution and it is believed that social and political sectors may achieve a similar breakthrough if the same method is used for its many accomplishments in science I will. For example, philosophers like David Hume are trying to preserve the moral "autonomy" related to religion. In this view, God and the future country are unnecessary for moral life and human society. John Locke and Thomas Jefferson Have you heard about Age of Enlightenment in history? This is important when people begin thinking new things in technology, science, politics, and philosophy. Enlightenment has also brought many unforgettable thinkers that continue to influence us today. Among these thinkers are very clever John Rock and Thomas Jefferson. Self-defense is part of the law of nature; it can not deny to the community and even to the king himself.

In ancient Greece there were two great literary philosophers. The first is Plato, then Aristotle. Aristotle is a student of Plato. Despite being taught by Plato, they have different theories and perspectives. Their morals are classical and traditional in classical Greece, but Aristotle details the road of virtue and happiness. The political theory of Pluto's utopia society is different from Aristotle's view of "the best state of every society". Their metaphysical theory is completely contrary and very contradictory. Author: Gerard · Cretian Plato and Aristotle Many modern experts believe Plato was the first true political philosophy, Aristotle is the first political scholar. They are the foundation of Socrates's great thinker and great Western philosopher. Plato and Aristotle each have ideas on how to improve their society during their existence. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze their different theories with this heavy metaphysical speculation. In conclusion, Hume wishes to limit metaphysical speculation to one field and is not so inclined to such a fate. Aristotle and Plato's excellence is a function, and what makes it a function is the definition of Plato's virtue. What does this definition mean? Both Plato and Aristotle have their own unique arguments dedicated to the topic in front of you and a way to explain what virtue is. It seems easy to define virtues, but it may be very difficult to truly understand the arguments behind the definition. - Definition of Philosophy Personal or moral philosophy is about how people should live or how to act. People who claim that the philosophy of our life is "lifetime", "at horn", or some cliches are often heard. Though the definitions are correct, these people use the phrase "philosophy", but the words closely related to our past, present and future great thinkers are different.

Enlightenment is a period of development with a specific way of thinking in history. People doubt that there is the best existence and belief in the natural order of things. "The creation of God and the stability of the stable order are challenged by a new concept of life, a constant and intangible change in life" (89). Norman Humpson analyzed many of the famous philosophical works of the time, "Only two attitudes still exist: continuing to Hume denies that humans acquire some form of objective knowledge Or accept Holbach's material movement world "All concepts are done as needed and the answer to each question is" possible ". " Voltaire Voltaire respects Candido. Candid is one of the leading writers, philosophers and leaders of the Enlightenment who is known as one of the greatest satire writers ever. Voltaire wrote an important genre: tragedy, history, philosophy and novels, just like his British contemporary Samuel Johnson. In the American traditional dictionary, we define the satire as follows. "Witt for attacking satire, absurd, or human corrupted or stupid art. In the story of Candide, Voltaire has a character's role and experience of dialogue between characters, and" everything in every possible world I am using the discussion of other philosophers on the theory that it is the best "(Voltaire) Voltail thinks that there are many flaws in the society in which he lives, explaining this throughout the story It is. One of Candide 's main dilemmas is an optimistic and pessimistic worldview. The optimistic view towards the world is related to Voltaire's criticism of Christianity throughout the story. Voltaire bore religion through a series of corrupt, hypocritical religious leaders, but he does not condemn daily religious believers. Candide grew up under the guidance of Pangloss, I thought this was the best world and I thought things were due to natural reasons. This Pangloss 's view is an optimistic view on the Christian - based world, the problem of the late Candid' s story, to Pangloss, "Things can not be realized because everything is the best" (Voltaire, 35). However, as Candid experienced many horrible events such as whiplash, rape, robbery, unjust enforcement, illness, earthquake, betrayal, he questioned the belief in optimism.

Decline of authority When Alice looked for glasses across wonderlands, she encountered various personality and her absurd claims cast doubt on her implicit assumption. The strange logic these characters brought to Alice forced her to acknowledge and reevaluate the objective truth she had previously accepted. As Carol's absurdness is exaggerated with an observable phenomenon in society but has identifiable similarity, this discrepancy makes sense, meaningless to Alice (and reader) that Carol's Have the experience of the essence of the satire. Epiphany Before the autumn of 2003 to 2004, the universe (such as a great architect) sent us to Grand Rapids, Montana, USA - they actually put the hydropower dams in several Missouri states. The waterfall is on the river near the Great Falls, Montana State. The geological and practical nature of these geological features, and the amazing integration of this geographical feature, were initially considered valuable named after the town of Great Falls. Each waterfall in Missouri Province in Cascade County has a hydroelectric dam. I think there is a total of 5 dams per 15 miles in Missouri. Historians have been fascinated by the decline of great civilizations like ancient Greece and Rome. However, for human beings, corruption does not include lessons less important than the collapse of the United States, ending the era of virtue and leading the entire planet into the second dark era. The philosophical power that ultimately destroyed the United States was released even before the birth of the country. His philosophical skepticism of 1748 "David Hume" will not rise tomorrow, the proposition is equally understandable, which means that it does not contradict it any more. In 1781, he wrote, "Purely rational criticism of Emmanuel Kant finds it necessary to deny knowledge to make room for faith," he wrote. Publications five years after the establishment of the United States of America

In the 19th century, we found independent or unrestricted themes in the development of two different borders. Manifesto Destiny, freedom of caste, and through opportunities for farmers to acquire almost free land, it was found in the western United States. Discover mathematical independence by building a stronger theoretical basis, non-Euclidean geometry and Cantor infinity. Independence involves breaking the traditional view that is generally accepted to explore new ideas. My historical discussion of the term 's identity follows the two important developments in identity - from general mathematics in the history of philosophy - metaphysical. Main genealogies follow evolution theory, psychology, and ultimately the development of identity as a national term. This evolution follows the main path of British empiricism of the 17th century, Scottish Enlightenment of the 18th century, and Utilitarianism of the 19th century. John Locke and David Hume develop their meanings into personal identities. This meaning was completed in the context of James Mill's Scottish Enlightenment. John Stuart Mill introduced it as a concept of collective psychology. I think he is the first person to use it as a citizen's identity in the sense of a modern center. From the day the United States won independence, the minded Americans tried to determine a new national identity invited by Paris peace. Especially exquisite scholars from the beginning of the 21st century dates back to this identity. Their ingenuity will enrich the American understanding of their new national character. But after all, their efforts are destined to fail. It asked how the attachment of the people would replace the narrow-minded people, in fact they are not. It assumes that the identity of the United States is actually concentrated when it is divided, which tells the political superiority among people focusing on social and economic problems. From the beginning, identity was the main focus of African and African American writers. Indeed, the identity of African Americans experienced dramatic changes between the 18th and 20th centuries. As Amistad's "Federal Party No. 54" presented by the new black and black soul shows, the identity of African Americans has changed from an early tribal identity to a slavery based inhumane identity It was. Finally, the new "Black Identity" is based on art and Africa. These changes

Greed, love of money is one of seven deadly sins. People are convinced that greed is evil everywhere in the world's culture and should be avoided. But there are also intellectual traditions that they believe are good for the economy. For Scottish Enlightenment Thinker David Hume this is an "industrial stimulus" - this will help promote the "invisible hand" of the market discovered by his ally Adam Smith. Recently, frankly, Michael Douglas's role, Gordon Gage declared "Good greed" in the movie "Wall Street". Objections of priests and founders of free market capitalism are sufficiently evident. God and Mammon often collide. But now, by using behavioral financial tools, applying behavioral psychology to financing allows you to choose between two options. New international research conducted under the support of State Street Applied Research Center shows that greed is not a good thing after all. In fact, greed may cause serious damage to our wealth. Psychologists now have a clear definition of love money. This is not to satisfy the tooling needs of all the other goals we have but to love or need money for our own interests. Using Money Ethic Sc ​​ale developed by Thomas Li-Ping Tang in 1992, State Street developed investor Love Money Scale (ILOMS). Researchers asked respondents from 20 countries a series of questions to find out how much money is important for self-esteem. They also tested their reaction in various financial situations. For example, they ask whether money is a symbol of success, whether they speak a lot or whether they want to be wealthy. The result is clear. The more emotional attachments a person has in money, the more likely he will make a mistake with money. Over the years, people have diagnosed a series of behavioral bias that causes investors to fall into predictable errors. Greed strengthens all these prejudices There is a high possibility that greedy people buy at the top and sell at the bottom - this is a major sin for investors and worse than others. Their time frame is also shorter, and they tend to be excessively active on guess. Frequent transactions can guarantee you pay more transaction costs, but rarely generate additional returns. Greed is not good. This is the crime of all the great religions of the world. Greed is an excessive form of a good idea: living a good life; greed is a charm with accumulation of more wealth, people lose moral balance. Greed leads to the spread of many bad ideas presented here. It also leads to very unequal distribution of income and wealth. The increase in demand is the reason for creating more employment. For lower taxes, the company will not invest more, or hire more. Companies will invest more and hire themselves so that demand increases and more profits are made. Since entrepreneurs prefer to make a lot of money, even after paying tax they can earn higher profits. Since the tax rate is always less than 100% (in fact less than 40%), the increase in pre-tax earnings will always result in an increase in after-tax profit. Greed is good. Without want, you will not be able to make your profit run. Without want, you will not be able to accept that transaction. But at the same time, greed may be very bad. Satisfactory, failed transactions may destroy your capital. Balancing the appropriate risk compensation and leverage, psychology, and appropriate retirement plan with your greed to minimize losses and maximize return will lead to better cash management . There are countless trading strategies there. Please take a quick look at the Forex Factory forum and get 2,675 free strategies. It's just from the website. Google 's "Forex Strategy" search will be more and more. Many authors of these trading strategies claim 70-80% success rate depending on who uses it We will create failsafe for bad behavior. Suppose your market is more likely to have desire and power. This is not a token market, but it is the use of global wealth demand and loopholes. Do n

The ideas and theories about the state of nature of John Rock and how it is applied to the government are used in many American historical documents. These documents, such as the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution of America, are important to how our government functions today. Age of Enlightenment's philosopher John Locke wrote the second paper on citizen's government. This article contains his reasons and opinions on the existence of the government and its mechanism. John Rock 's natural rights, equality, and functioning government theory has been incorporated into our earliest historical literature and has laid the foundation of the government that exists today. In the second paper on citizen's government John Locke wrote that humans exist in state of nature's freedom and equality. In this natural state there is a law. This law states that "No one should harm others in his life, freedom, or wealth." (Locke) However, there is a problem with this natural condition. According to Locke, "the property he has in this state is not very safe and not very safe." (Locke) So in order to protect their natural rights, people find some protection measures It must be. As a result, "People will unite under one federation and they will put them under the government to protect their lives, freedoms and wealth" (Locke) Without the government, world It will eventually get into confusion and most people's rights will be lost. Locke also pointed out that a fair government with legislation established is necessary. Locke's work requires a fair and legitimate ruler. Mr. Locke states as follows. "When a long series of abuses is done, always pursuing the same purpose indicates that the design is to reduce them. From nomads hunting and gathering to today's place, wealth is always the foundation of human progress. Mr. John Rocke wrote that the second government document, a document explaining the basic principles of the US government, states that "the government has no purpose other than to protect property." And the familiarity of property. Initially, the idea of ​​property protection by the government seems contrary to intuition, but government services from police, firefighters, military to libraries, schools and social security at least include our lives, freedom , Property is included. For example, the police protect our lives from murder, freedom of kidnapping, and our theft. We all remember the British philosopher John Rock from high school history and government history. His social contract laid the foundation of the "US Declaration of Independence" followed by the US government. However, Locke also supports the concept of "whiteboard". This is translated as "Black Slate". This will define empirical epistemology: Human acquires knowledge through experience. When we were born, our idea was blank, and as we grew, we gained knowledge through our senses. David Hume said this repeatedly, he said, John Rock 's ideas and theory of how the state of nature and how it applies to the government are used in many American historical documents. These documents, such as the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution of America, are important to how our government functions today. Age of Enlightenment's philosopher John Locke wrote the second paper on citizen's government. This article contains his reasons and opinions on the existence of the government and its mechanism. John Rock 's natural rights, equality, and functioning government theory has been incorporated into our earliest historical literature and has laid the foundation of the government that exists today. John Rock is the most influential role in American history, thought and practice. Without the influence of his work, the United States will not have the basis of nontransferable rights, stable governance, and quality of life. However, rock is still widely known and has not been studied by a new generation of Americans. - Pocahontas was an influential native Ame

Max Weber is one of the founders of sociology. In his most famous work "The spirit of Protestant ethics and capitalism," he claims that capitalist seed belongs to Protestant occupational ethics. But Weber was also an economist and saw the distinctive features of advanced capitalism in extensive division of labor and hierarchical management like the political bureaucracy just as it did in Germany before the First World War . Both of these features combine to create a new middle class whose position is dependent on human capital rather than physical capital and labor. However, in advanced capitalism, Weber believes that companies and entrepreneurs are at risk of the source of great progress (see entrepreneurial spirit). Weber accepted criticism of Ludwig von Mises' socialist economic plan and joined his own argument. Under the socialist system he believes that workers will still work hierarchically, but I believe that this hierarchy will be integrated with the government. He foresaw the dictatorship of the officials, not the dictatorship of the workers. Like David Hume in front of him, Weber believes in the possibility of social science without value. Therefore, what he means is that people can not find a way that the world should be simple by studying the world. Weber does not exclude that the normative analysis is viable or worth - he believes in a reasonable argument of value - he just wants an economist to distinguish between facts and values Born in Germany, Weber studied law in France and continued his postgraduate work at a medieval trading company in Italy and Spain. He was appointed Chairman of the political economy of Freiburg in 1894 and was appointed another Chairman of Heidelberg's political economy in 1896. He suffered a spiritual collapse in 1898 and did not continue his studies until 1904. He is a private scholar mainly in Heidelberg since 1904. Max Weber was born on April 21, 1864. His father, Max Weber Sr, is a politically active lawyer who prefers "world pleasure" and his mother Helene Fallenstein Weber wants a more abusive life. It is a way. The conflict arising in their marriage had a great influence on Max. Nevertheless, their houses are filled with excellent intellectuals and lively words. In the process of growing, he was tired of school and despised the teacher, but he himself swallowed classical literature. Born on 21 April 1864 in Erfurt, Thuringia, Max Weber was the eldest son of Max Weber and Helenfalenstein Weber. Max Weber was suffering from meningitis at the age of 4 and he read as his past time and developed his academic ability as a young man (Secher 1980). Max Weber majored in law in 1882 at the University of Heidelberg. However, as a military officer volunteered to participate in military training, his education was interrupted. In 1884 he retrained in 1890 and graduated (Secher 1980). He was a professor of economics at the University of Freiburg in 1894. After he married Mariannechniker for one year, Marianschnigger was a senior prostitute of Max Weber. Ironically, Weber suffered from long-term psychosis and declined work during the 1897 career peak (Gerth & Mill 1982). Max Weber, Junior Born in 1864 Germany, Erfurt. He is Max Weber, Senior. The biggest of eight children born with Helene Fallenstein Weber. Max Junior is a sick child. At the age of 4, he was suffering from meningitis. Although he finally recovered, due to the rest of his life he suffered from physical and emotional sequelae of illness, most notably anxiety and nervous tension. From a very young age, books are at the heart of Weber's life. He read everything he can get, including Kant, Machiavelli, Spinoza, Goethe and Chopin Howell, who wrote two historical articles before his 14th birthday. However, Weber pays little attention in the lesson, and there are few jobs to go to school. According to his legacy Marian, "His teachers are not civilized, but he does not respect them."

Through doubt and doubt, Descartes cast an easy and complicated question. Shocked by all the lies he believed, Descartes certainly began to rationally decide what could exist without a doubt. Descartes doubts everything so that his customary view and false knowledge do not hinder the ability to truly perceive things. As far as the body is concerned, our senses tell us that when the ligament outside the body and the substance together create the body. However, when we are skeptical and suspicious of all previous knowledge, we can not prove that our physical existence is deceived by our sense. Even if there is a suspicion of existence ... more content After the wax melted, all the waxes (their color, taste, fragrance) were removed, but the idea of ​​wax remained. But our wisdom, our only reasoning and understanding ability will tell us that it is the same wax. We know that it is the same wax after it melts, but the flame makes it look different from it. If solids and dissolved waxes are the same, how does intelligence know this? Descartes concluded that his ability to understand wax is not only through sensations acquired by the body but also from his own intelligence inference and understanding. In order to judge what is certain, we must doubt all previous knowledge and beliefs. With doubt on everything, the sensation gained by the body becomes unreliable, and all remaining emotions are reliable nature of thought and intelligence. In order for us to understand through sensation, we must have ideas. The belief that thinking exists enables self creation, the power of intelligence and thinking. The difference between self, thinking ability, and everything else is that it is beyond doubt. Contrary to Descartes, Buddhist philosophy refuses to accept the concept of self. According to Buddhism, there is a self that means there is a part that you can control. So, I am not saying "I do not think that I am thinking like this". Rene Descartes says "About methodology" (Cartesian 1637). I think it is quite obvious as I think I will exist. Through our thinking, we provide evidence of our existence. But Jill Bolte Taylor added her idea to TED.com's purely right-brain video demonstration "I do not think so". Neuroanatomist Jill Voltte Taylor provides a detailed, sometimes emotional explanation René Descartes, an early modern philosopher who invented analytical geometry, says: In fact, this is not a good technical translation. Descartes means "I am closer, because I am thinking." Certainty: How to implement it and when you know it. In the long history of philosophical discourse, most philosophers try to find out what they believe is convincing, that everyone should agree regardless of their political or other status did. "I think that I like this" The famous introduction of René de Carte is the basis of his dualism theory. Mixture of thinking and body, or materials of expansion and thought, tells the thought of Descartes 'real human'. Descartes' thought that the body is completely independent from the heart is called mechanical view. Descartes's interest in "thinking about yourself" is the first and important step in the transition from metaphysics to epistemology in modern philosophy. He realized the necessity of orderly thought, and he called it a method. The phrase "I think so," or "Cogito ergo sum" may make Descartes the most cited philosopher in the past 400 years. French theory - if I am thinking, I must also exist - is the foundation of modern philosophy. For Descartes, Cogito forms the basis of all other knowledge. In the depth of contemplation, Cogito is the truth decided when Descartes doubts everything. But since Descartes, suspicion has expanded. David Hume and Emanuel Kant asked me what I thought about "me", so I did. Because I have "I", did not you think that happened? Perhaps we should say that it is "thinking" as we said "rain", and say that "I" is right behind this idea.

Times (2017) Times, Sunday Times (2017) Day (2016) Day (2017) Day (2016) Time, Sunday Times (2016) When he introduced another series to introduce the dishes of his country, A warning to another celebrity chef he sent. Sun (2016) Wales will start its first new tax for nearly 800 years based on the forces issued by Westminster, that will allow it to replace stamp duties. At that time, the Sunday Times (2016) plans to submit a bill tomorrow to give legal effect to the results of the referendum, and parliamentarians should pass it immediately. Times, Sunday Times (2017) Times, Sunday Times (2010) Times, Sunday Times (2012) Times, Sunday Times (2010) Pass, Christopher, Lowes, Brian Collins Economics Dictionary (1993) Times, Sunday Times (2007) Times Sunday Times (2008) Times, Sunday Times (2013), he insists that the program is launched faster than anticipated, as the trial was very successful. Times, Sunday Times (2015) Charles A. Dumbrogio & Stewart D. Hodges & Richard Breary & Stewart Myers Corporate Finance Corporate (1991) Times, Sunday Times (2007) Times, Sunday Times (2015) Times, Sunday Times (2008 ) Max Hastings Nemesis: 194445 (2007) Kim, Victor aim for that! : How to Become an Entrepreneur (1986) Times, Sundays Times (2007) When you fall in love, you introduce new things. Patricia, Mansfield, why can not I have confidence? (1994) Times, Sunday Times (2006) Times, Sunday Times (2008) This is part of a series of measures to strengthen the justice system with an important bill submitted to the House yesterday. Day (2014) Times, Sunday Times (2010) Baron and Shane (2008) argues that there is no definition of an entrepreneurial spirit that was agreed separately, either as an activity or a research field. They acknowledge that the definition of entrepreneurs introduced by Shane and Venkataraman (2000) is a very popular definition. Shane and Venkataraman (2000) aims to understand how an entrepreneurial spirit is created and discovered how to organize new products, services, markets, manufacturing processes, raw materials, and existing technologies We define it as a business field. It was created by individuals (entrepreneurs) who develop and utilize these opportunities in a variety of ways to influence broadly (Baron and Shane, 2008) By definition, a species is considered "introduced" if it falls within its natural scope and is human mediated. Explanation by human beings can be described as intentional or accidental. Intentional introductions are (1) believed that in some respects (1) newly introduced species are beneficial to humans in new places, or (2) intentionally introduced but the potential impact Promoted by individuals or groups not considering. Intentional or unintentional introductions are often by-products of human movement and are therefore not bound by human motives. Subsequent expansion of introduction species may or may not include human activity. From a linguistic point of view, the definition of terms and meanings brings the possibility of understanding. Personalization is a property of the world of psychology, but it is worth noting that Jung's purpose is not only that. For him, it contains human philosophy, mystery, and spiritual realm. The history of the word itself dates back to the 1600s. It is when used to identify an individual as personal or personal. Again, Jung also applies another element of the classical psychology paradigm; freedom to rename and redefine applicable terms within the limited scope to the task in front of you In this paper, we propose the definition of responsibility taking this distinction into account. This definition is an extension of the definition of causality introduced by Halpern and Pearl (2004a). Just like many other definitions of causality, you can go back to Hume (1739). This is based on anti-factual dependence. Roughly speaking, A is the reason of B. If A does not occur (A occurs, this is a condition contrary to the fact), B will not occur. As we all know, th

Thomas F. Siafa Jr. Kelsey Mann IB Literature The murder case of "Red Card" on February 11, 2016 required that S. L. Gilbow's short story to occur in a future disorderly society. In this society, certain minorities are entitled to kill other population freely without any influence. Before they strike, nobody knew who these selected people are, and when they use this privilege it was handed over to another person. Red cards that show you that you are given this power are mostly circulated like currency and those who own them are powerful. Having these cards, as this short story shows, can change you, sometimes even the worst thing. The main character is a woman of a red card shooting her husband. Her red card and subsequent violence made her herself a housewife. But the murder of her husband has also changed from the first red cardinal housewife who was hesitant to her to the second red vengeful and angry woman ready to use her. In today's society, murder is illegal, for most people this is morally wrong. However, the author seems not to be bad in this story. In S. L. Gilbow's "The Red Card", homicide is tolerated and even appealing even by his indifference, dissatisfaction, doubt, and various literary measures to his life. To make the murder more attractive, this story depicts emotions that are indifferent to life. When the author talks about the people's reaction to the murder of Linda's husband, he uses words such as "excellent" (12), "somewhat self-evident" (12), "not creative" (12) Let's see. Most people do not seem to doubt the fact that a man died. Even people who even said that "he should get something" (12). His death did not affect them at all, and their behavior seemed to be part of their daily lives. Meanwhile, citizen Jenny Collins did it. A. f. Thomas explained his style in 1902 according to the skull of the specimen collected in Sichuan Province. Pococ Premier A. A. f. Because of the long winter coat of Styani, the fur is black, the skull is large, the forehead is curved, and the teeth are harder, it is moldy. His explanation is based on skull and skin collected in Sichuan Province near Mitokina and Upper Myanmar near the border with Yunnan Province. Red panda belongs to territory, except for mating period, it is lonely. This seed is usually quiet except for communication sounds like sagging, tweeting, whistling. According to reports, it is night and dusk, sleeping with branches and trees during the day, increasing activity in the evening and evening. Stretching branches while sleeping, swinging legs when hot, rolling in the face when cold As he praised the painter Thomas Moran, the first name Thomas was chosen by Julian Barber. Last name Effing responded to inappropriate word f - ing (* fuck *). He used it to show that his whole life was "tied up". He was attacked by Thomas' new life, causing his embarrassing accident. He visited Paris until the beginning of the Second World War. Next he moved to a large apartment in New York with a maid, Mrs. Hume, and assistant from Russian student Pavel Shum of Paris. Effing learned later that he had a son, a professor of history of obesity, but he did not contact him. After Pavel was murdered in a car accident, Effen hired his grandson as his new assistant. Mark must read various books to him, explain the landscape of Manhattan to the blind, and take him to the wheelchair to walk, and finally write Ev ob In 1666, the fire at Thomas Farina Bakery at Pudding Lane passed the slums and ran out of control, exceeding 3,000 degrees Fahrenheit. The mayor of Sir Thomas Lutterworth (whose name is!) Took a long time to dismantle the building into firewalls, and in 5 days fire in London caused most of the city to rubble. At the time, about 80 thousand inhabitants lived in the walls of the old city, but when a fire broke out, 70 thousand people were homeless. Thousands of houses, churches, and businesses were destroyed, and the old London was completely destroyed.

Evolutionary psychology is a field where human thought explains such reasons using evolution theory. Several philosophers like Hume believe that human thinking is initially a state of blank paper with some general learning ability. It says natural selection is more than what human thinking was thinking before. What is the difference between these two views? To aid the discussion, Ken introduced Leda Cosmides, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of California at Santa Barbara. Cosmides gives some background on the field of evolutionary psychology. Then she cited an example of how evolutionary psychology reveals human behavior, inbreeding problems. She explained the mechanism formed in her mind to close the romantic concern of brothers and sisters. Evolutionary psychology seems to allow us to predict moral attitudes of specific behaviors based on putative psychological mechanisms. These mechanisms seem to provide some knowledge that can not exist in Hume's concept of mind. In addition, they thought of both altruism and incest. Ken refused to ask whether the culture would allow the transmission of information for generations. Is not there a big difference in culture? Is not this a counter example of evolutionary psychology? Cosmid denied human beings have cultural ability to truly solve the problem. What algorithms can I use to explain cultural problems? Is culture and evolution another flow of information transmission? How evolutionary psychology understands the beneficial adaptability to our ancestral ancestry, but this is not good for us now. Ken believes that this raises philosophical questions about "should" and "so". He points out that it is necessary to pay attention to guess what evolutionary psychology says, how our ancestors should take action, and how we should act today. did. John asked if the cognitive structure required by Darwin's algorithm occasionally brings up a brain that can deal with more complex things like quantum physics. Ken then asked the evolutionary psychologist how to distinguish between what we are doing now like philosophy and physics and activities adapted to our ancestors such as relative discrimination. Cosmides shows some examples of how an evolutionary psychologist differentiates between these two tasks. Roving Philosophical Report (05: 36): Amy Standen interviewed a professor of psychology and understood gender difference between men and women. The professor states that our basic behavior is the same as the basic behavior of ancient fathers. 62 philosophers (looking for 49:54): Ian Shoales explains the simple history of standardized intelligence testing Together with Peter Harrison, "Linnaeus as a Second Adam? Taxonomy and Religious Occupation"; Mikael Stenmark, "Three Humanity Theories", "John F. Haught", "Theology, Evolution, and Human Thought: Biology Celia Dean Drummond argues that "Animals are moral? Theological evaluation of the evolution of" good and evil "in a blank state: Steven Pinker claims that denial of the modern human race. Currently, there are three competing views of mankind - Christian theory, the "state of blank paper" theory (what I call social constructivism theory), and Darwinian theory - and finally these theories will win. I think that the result of this competition and the specific contents of these theories are not as clear as Pinker believes. Evolution is attractive as it tries to answer one of the most basic questions of mankind: Where does life come from? Evolutionism suggests that life and human beings are created through the process of nature. Many people do not believe this This is constantly evolving in news. In this article we will explore the evolution and its mechanism. We will also consider some important areas of vulnerability in the current theory. Scientific research will play a role in completing theory in the next few years. Many people believe that these vulnerabilities prove that evolution should be overthrown. Therefore,

One day a friend told me a strange phenomenon: add your birth date (eg 1955 = 55 years old) and it to your age (you will be 56 years old this year, for example); they I always do addition 111. My friend tried it, this is true. I understand that the math behind it is simple, but the explanation of my friend is on a very different plane. "Take a look at how we relate to each other, fans, artists and travelers around the world are completely caring and bringing in life. Everyone expresses her passion for life and kindness If it shares, the world will be warmer, while she is not based on science, sometimes "rational facts" are considered magical and spiritual. I mailed the explanation to her in the second half of the day. As my son pointed out, this is very simple: your date of birth is the number of years of life in the last century and the birth age is the number of years since then; the total is 100, and our total Any. It will be 112 in 2011 or 111 - next year. I want to eliminate her idea because this interpretation will give her all the discounts she says. But then I started thinking about my interpretation of her, as well as the role of magic or mythical thinking and science. As a scientist, I think science is always the best, is this always the same? Her passion for "111" and other mysterious mythical ideas are very positive. Look at our similarities and interrelationships. The chain reaction created by this understanding will bring greater tolerance, equality and compassion among us. The relationship with our "beliefs" is increasingly aware of the possibility that it may be more important than beliefs and knowledge itself. Joseph Campbell wrote the power of myths for a long time. I began to see how my beliefs - our myths - provide us with an understanding of what is unknown (in my friend this is a strange phenomenon in 111). If we believe that there is sympathy, love, and useful behavior, these beliefs may be beneficial to the whole person and to the whole human race. If our beliefs create intolerance, inequality, hatred, you probably want to abandon them. However, we need to study how we relate to our beliefs. It is probably not just to exclude it as facts or fiction. Whether it is scientific or not, each one of us investigates our "beliefs", positive behaviors that produce love, compassion, beneficial behavior, and inefficient behavior that produces intolerance, inequality, hatred Examine you. Through such research, you can learn to abandon the latter and prosper the former, even if you are not based on science. Everyone does not have to accept the "same reality" of the world, but you do not have to work hard to find a world that can create a world with peace, equality, love and compassion. This way of understanding the relationship with your faith is summarized in the idiomatic phrase "Beauty is in the eye of the beholder", or "Benjamin Franklin (1741)" states it. As David Hume said, "Beauty of things exists only in thought in mind" (1742). What is your relationship with your faith? Is it beauty or not? "Our beliefs are like undoubted orders, they tell us what you can do, what you can do, what you can do, what you can do, what is impossible, what you can do and what you can not do Anthony Robins I know this is the truth I have always heard that, but that is totally meaningful: If you can not show what it is in an attractive and meaningful way, your audience will see the action video and You will have to take the rest of the Kickstarter page, it will be very far away When there are enough people to understand this idea, you can make persistent and meaningful changes to the world. Your words, your actions, your beliefs, your compassion, mutual understanding verify the existence of our slimy movie on the planet at the end of the Milky Way, while trying to see ourselves It is action. I know myself The company should be a group of people who have a similar understanding about the world. These belie

This is very famous and very long, so this must be a very good book. I think that the best part of the book is about infinite chapters. (Pp. 145 - 155) However, there is no thesis on the background of this book Unless you are familiar with British English, grammar is difficult to understand. It is long and repetitive, the theme is not important In the infinite chapter, we explain in detail the problem surrounding the concept of infinite correlation. This is very relevant for mathematicians who may want to understand why they encounter some difficulty. Today, mathematics is infinite and there is no philosophical argument. In the era of rock, this topic is still controversial There is no basic summary of the history of publication on the lack of editorials. So I do not know which version this is. Clearly, Rock 's "Papers on Human Understanding" was first outlined in the 1688 publication. (See page xvii.) Then another source (not a book) has told me that Locke's life has four versions and the first two are in 1689 and 1694 . Other sources of information say 1690, 1644, 1695 and 1700. However, page 15 of this book clearly refers to the ninth edition which is based on the ninth edition. On page xx, the author 's preface states that this is the sixth edition. So everyone guessed whether this is the version that Locke saw or later. The publication date is important because people want to compare the idea in the book at the time with the idea in other books in order to evaluate the influence. This book was written in the days of Boyle and Newton. (See page xvi) If you are not a native English speaker and are familiar with regional differences in sentence structure, it may be difficult to obtain a book. As in local spoken English, conjunctions and prepositions are usually ignored. Many times, we have to reread the sentences to decide the beginning and end of the term. This will be a little troublesome reading Several flame wars with some trolling bishops were inserted in the text, and he seemed to know nothing about Locke 's theme. These meaningless responses to meaningless open letters are less useful on paper. The author is very wealthy and must be able to include so many waffles in the body. Overall, I think this is a book you really should put on the shelf for historical reasons. We do not recommend reading actually. This is a big book at a low price. Real bargain! John Locke wrote a lot of themes. "Papers on human understanding" are mainly related to knowledge, reality, thought in philosophy, and are the main classics in all these fields. He also wrote an important classic on political philosophy, "citizen government papers", and major works in religion, education, and economics. Charles II of England (1630-1685) claimed absolute power on Friday 3 December 2010, but its use was restricted. The following sentence reflects Charles' achievement as a scientific road. "Papers on human understanding" is research based on John Rock's knowledge and understanding of humans. It first appeared in 1689 (although the date was 1690), it was printed under the heading "Papers on Humanitarian Understanding". He expressed his birth mind as a blank state (he did not use real words, but tabla lasa) and then filled it with experience. This article is one of the main sources of empiricism in contemporary philosophy and has influence many awareness philosophers such as David Hume and George Berkeley. John Rock's Human Understanding Papers In John Rock's "Papers on Human Understanding," he distinguishes between the various ideas that we can imagine with object perception. Locke separates these concepts into primary and secondary quality. Any criticism for this distinction is necessary, otherwise perception will be coincidental. - Both John Rock and Thomas Hobbs believe that men are essentially equal, but their personal view on equality suggests a fundamentally different approach to proper citizenship I guided you to do. Locke b

Beaver 's logo This story was held in the forest of Maine State on the summer border of 1768. Matt Hallowell and his father made a claim for the territory of Maine. If they find the perfect place, they will build a new cottage. There are many trees around and there is a river near the water and food. There is enough space to grow maize. There are no other settlers. After Matt and his father prepared the place, they all decided that Matt would stay to defend the new hut, and his father would have Matt's mother who would have a child and his sister I went back to Massachusetts in order to gain other family including. . Elizabeth George Spear was born in Massachusetts State in 1908 and is the author of Beaver. Before writing a book she wrote a drama and an article for a magazine. I like to write historical novels, and these novels are stories set in the past, usually not based on real people, but there is a possibility that this has happened. Many of her books are prevalent in the classroom. The most famous are three black bird pond witches, bronze bow and beaver logo. A croutadori witch written in 1958 and a bronze bow written in 1961 won a Newberry medal, one of the most prestigious honors in children's literature. The beaver logo won the Newbery Honor Award. It also won the Scott Odell Historical Novel Prize in 1984. Spear is one of the six other writers with two Newberry medals! In 1989, Spear was also awarded Laura Ingalls' Wilder Medal. Beaver's logo is a child's novel by Elizabeth George Spear. It was published in 1983. The story took place in the 18 th century, followed by a 12 - year - old boy Matt James Harlow, who was building a shed with his father in the wilderness of Maine. When his father left to take back another family, Matt was alone in the cabin and had a hard time coping with the challenge of survival, and eventually got help from the existence of Attatan, a member of the Beaver tribe It was. Beaver 's logo was inspired by a true story dating back to 1802, recorded in the history of the town of Maine State Milo, a teenager left to look after his house. I was saved when his supply was filled by a bear. This book was one of the most popular novels by Spear and was a huge success and won numerous literary awards such as Scott Odell's History Novel Prize and Christopher Award. 1997 - Beaver logo. (93 minutes) Actor: Keith Carradin, Annette O'Toole. Introduction: Male settlers from the Massachusetts in the 18th century and their sons settled on the land of the Maine State, built a hut with the father and brought the boy to the land, to the Massachusetts for the rest of the family I let you go. When living, nature and locals survive. 1997 - 12 angry men. (116 minutes) Director: William Friedkin. Actor: George C. Scott, Jack Lemmon, Tony Danza, Durian Hearwood, Hume Kronin, Edward James Olmos, Courtney B. Vance, Ossie Davis, Armin Muller - Star. Introduction: In a warm, air-conditioned jury in New York, 12 juries claimed that a teenager accused of stabbing a father was guilty or innocent, causing the case. Discussion on facts. There may be doubts about eliciting prejudice, hidden feelings, understanding among other juries. (98 minutes) Director: Rouben Mammalian. Writer: Samuel Hohenstein. Actor: Frederic March, Miriam Hopkins, Rose Hobart. (According to Robert Louis Stevenson, 1886/157 pagination.) (Adventure type: Mystery, Crime, Horror) (Frederick March - 1931-1932 Best Actor Award)

Carl Popper, Sir Carl Raymond Popper (born in Vienna, Austria on July 28, 1902, died September 17, 1994, Croydon, England, London), Austrian born and social philosopher, he is a deterministic metaphysics I believe that knowledge has evolved from mental experience. His first book, Logik der Forschung (1934; logic of scientific discovery), was published by a logical positivist published in Vienna, but Popper rejected their inductive empiricism and developmental hismism . After studying mathematics, physics and psychology at the University of Vienna, I taught philosophy at the University of Canterbury University in New Zealand (1937 - 45). In 1945, he became a logical reader at the London School of Economics, retired from 1949 to 1969, where he served as a professor of logic and scientific methods. The main contribution to Popper's scientific philosophy is that he refuses to induce empirical science. According to this traditional view, scientific hypotheses can be verified and verified by obtaining repetitive results supporting observations. But as the Scottish empiricist David Hume shows, there are countless such confirmations to prove that this theory is correct. Instead, Popper considers deductive verification to be done via so-called "authenticable criteria". In this way, scientists try to find observed exceptions to his hypothetical rules. Therefore, the lack of contradictory evidence is proof of his theory. Popper believes that fake science such as astrology, metaphysics, Marxist history, Freud's psychoanalysis do not follow the principle of counterfeiting, so it is not an empirical science. Works after Popper include "Open Society and its Enemies" (1945), "Historical Poverty" (1957), and "Posterior Remarks of Scientific Discovery Logic", Volume 3 . (1981-82) He was named Jazz in 1965. Counterfeitability of clarification of speech by Sar Karl Popper by Karl Popper is very impressive, including "Where to draw". Unlike most people, the validity of the theory is not as worryful as the way he decides validity. This is a question that really did not attract the attention it deserves. Mr. Popper is a synthetic compound that is structurally related to androgens and testosterone "when the theory should be classified as science" and "is there a standard in scientific properties or a theory?" (Amsterdam et al., 2010, Thiblin and Petersson, 2004). Testosterone has two effects on the human body; first, it helps to develop and maintain male sexual characteristics in secondary schools, and secondly it promotes muscle growth. Carl Popper was born in Vienna (then Austria - Hungary) in 1902 and was a middle class parent. Popper's grandparents were all Jews but were not godly As part of the process of cultural assimilation, the Popper family was reborn as Lutheran, so he accepted Lutheran Baptism. His father, Simon Sigmundt, Carl Popper, is a Bohemian lawyer and lawyer at the University of Vienna, and his mother Jenny Sif is from Silesia and Hungary. Popper's uncle is Austrian philosopher Joseph Popper-Links. After establishing his position in Vienna, Father of Popper became a partner of Vienna Freed mayor Mayor Raimund Grübre and took over the business after the death of Guruburu in 1898. Popper soon deepened socializing in Vienna. After Raimund Grübl, Popper got his middle name. (Popper mistakenly remembered that Gruble's name is Carl in his autobiography)

Webster's dictionary defines hedonism as a "happy ethical theory that can be thought of in various ways with respect to personal or social well-being, key interests and goals of correct behavior" or "" people always act like this " It is. The theory says "Ask for happiness, avoid suffering." I consider that by considering this definition, further study of John Stuart Mill's theory of hedonism in theory, hedonism is not a distinctive or unique way of thinking . In philosophy, there is an interesting theme called hedonism. "Happiness" which is the joy of Greek (hdon) is the theory that happiness or happiness is the greatest concern and is the main objective of human life. It refers to a series of theories about what is good for humans and the motivation to make humans act in their own way. There are many thought experiments in hedonism. Among many things, one of the interesting experiments I found is The Experience Machine. "Experience Machine" created by philosopher Robert Nozick in his work "Anarchy", "Country", "Utopia" is a beautiful thinking experiment for the world of virtual reality. When philosophers discuss hedonism, they are most likely to refer to a more specific theory about value hedonism, especially hedonism of happiness. As a value theory (best known as value hedonism), hedonism thinks that all the only happiness is inherently worthwhile and that only pain is inherently worthless. The term "essentially" is an important part of the definition and is the most comprehensible compared to the term "instrument". If it is worth it, it is inherently worthwhile. Happiness is considered to be of essential value. Even if it does not bring other benefits, it is still a good experience. Money is an example of goodness; its value for us comes from what we can do with it (something we can buy using it). If no one has sold anything, the fact that large amounts of money are not worthwhile indicates that funds are not of essential value. The word "hedonism" comes from the "happiness" of ancient Greek. Psychological or motivated hedonism insists that only happiness or pain motivates us. Moral or evaluation hedonism insists that only happiness has value or value and that only pain or dissatisfaction diminishes or opposes value. Jeremy Bentham claims psychological and moral hedonism using the first two sentences of his book "Introduction to moral and legislative principles". Only governance can point out what we have to do and we can decide what we are about to do. The controversy about hedonism was also a feature for centuries before Bentham and continued after him. Other major contributors to the hedonistic debate are Plato, Aristotle, Epicuras, Aquinas, Butler, Hume, Mill, Nietzsche, Brentano, Sidgwick, Moore, Ross, Broad, Lyle, Tiszam

Epistemology in psychology (knowledge theory) and Tabula rasa (Latin: "flat scraping" - "clean state") are hypothetical conditions printed by empathists after thought has passed through the reaction. It was previously based on human thought. Perceive the outside world of objects Comparison of mind and blank lighting boards will be held at Arimostere's De anima (4th century BC, on the soul), stoic school, and esoteric school (Lyceum student, Aristotle's school). Please insist on psychological gap in original condition. But both Aristotle and Stoic schools emphasize the potential of inactive or inactive mind and soul before accepting a perceptual mind, respond to these ideas through intellectual processes and turn them into knowledge It is. In the late 17th century, British empathicist John Rock advocated a new revolutionary emphasis on British economist John Rocke in "Papers on Human Understanding" (1689). He thinks that this idea was originally similar to "white paper, all characters are ineffective". From experience, I will draw "all material of reason and knowledge". However, before Locke, Locke does not believe that the mind is simply blank or sky, and few other experientialists have taken such an extreme position. Nevertheless, Rock himself knows the natural "reflexive" ability (means of thinking, feelings, emotions etc) as a means to use experienced materials and a limited field of deductive (unexperienced) knowledge I admit it). He still thinks that it is "not important" and is basically satisfied (for example, "soul is a soul", "everyone is an animal"). David Hume, an experienced researcher in the 18th century Scotland, also gave a similar view. In the mid-20th century, Britain followed by Britain (analytic) philosophy affected the proper concept of the whiteboard. In the eleventh century Arabic Persian philosopher Ibn Sina developed the theory of whiteboard more clearly. He believes that "... the human intelligence at birth is like a whiteboard, pure possibilities are realized through education, and know," knowledge is the thing of this world ... It is well known through experience. Realization of "abstract universal concept" through development of a syllabologistic approach to "inference"; observations lead to statements of propositions, which lead to further abstraction when compounded. "He further believes in that intelligence itself" ... has a level of static / physical intelligence (al - 'aql al - hayulani), this possibility is a positive intelligence (al-' aql al -fa) Il)), the state of human intelligence combined with a complete knowledge source. " The empirical theory of "tabula rasa" was also developed by Ibn Sina. He is "the wisdom of human beings when they were born are like whiteboards, the pure possibilities realized through education", "familiar with the experiences of things in this world, from which abstract general concepts We will acquire knowledge by converting. This is the result of "a three-part approach to reasoning; observations lead to prepositional statements leading to further abstraction when compounded". He further argues that "intelligence itself" has a level of development of material intelligence (al - 'aql al - hayulani) This possibility is a positive intellect of knowledge (al -' aql al - fa ' il), you can get a combination of national human wisdom and perfect knowledge sources. " Swiss philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau of the 18th century used the whiteboard to support his view that war is the emergence of society and agriculture, not human beings' natural state. Ruso uses it to show that human beings have to learn war because it is written on the white board that humans are born in "blank". Tabula rasa is also posted in psychoanalysis of Sigmund Freud. Freud explained that personality characteristics are formed by family dynamics (see Oedipus Complex). Freud's theory suggests that although humans lack free will, hereditary has little effect on human personality. In Freu

Looking at the lens narrator in the light is a simple person. He believes in the best people. Ray did not think that Ray hurt him. He believes in Ray. Just two days with someone he never saw before, he trusted him. He gave Ray's clothes, money, food, and reasons to believe. He is a salesman with van and some things. He is not rich. He earns his living by making a living. He had not given him much yet. Ray is a player. How can he make a narrator believe him? Ghigliotti was hired by the House Government Reform Committee to review the videotape of the Texas Waco Siege Battle. He said he decided that the FBI was dismissed on April 19, 1993. The FBI explained the burst of infrared light due to the reflection of sunlight scattered into the glass fragments and other debris after the explosion. According to the report, the 28-year-old journalist, Britta Hume's son Sandy Hume, was found dead in his home in Arlington, Virginia. In addition to his death as a "plain" suicide statement, the story is also taking full media outage. According to the Associated Press, Arlington police did not respond to any inquiries. Clinton Body Bag Saga and Seth Rich & # DNCFraudSuit may eventually be the end of their criminal dynasty We did not sit in a freshwater place, a hotel with running water, and reviewed the overview. Please describe in detail the specific shots we want to take and how to interwork with the interview to create the correct advertising story. We made an instant production meeting with all the teams with a small balcony and reviewed the tool kit together with the production assistants Tolu and Joy. After 2 weeks preparation, there was a burst of excitement, and this is happening. The next day, a large partner conference that takes time shooting with the girls' club will be held and theaters they created will be taken to cope with sexual violence at school. When we wrapped it on the first day, Jesse drank gallons of water. Since we all got tired, we returned to Freetown. Most of it slept behind the car. After setting up lighting and props, we were involved in the shooting dilemma. We have four shots to sell Jack Daniels which is now lit up brightly. The first shot was a low angle shot, and we turned off the light to reveal the can. It's low angle, so it will eventually look much bigger than real life. The intention is to say that this product is a big problem. The second shot is close-up, central, complete product shot, and all blinking lights in the background. The drip began to flow under the can, it was where we cut to the third shot: macro close-up drip. The third shot shows dripping of water around Jack Daniels. Finally, since the fourth shot is a perfect shooting range of the product, there is a possibility of a beverage slogan displayed on the side of the can

In a lavish Saturday afternoon at the end of the summer of 1953, a beaten pickup truck was sitting in front of the Memphis studio where it made a record for any $ 4 pop music. Truck Driver - 18 year old country music singer who spends as much as $ 40 per week as a delivery member of Crown Electric and saves 4 dollars to sing and play guitar as a birthday present. A woman named Marion Keisker told a young man. "What kind of singer are you?" She asked him. The story of Elvis Presley's wonderful life started on January 8, 1935. Elvis · Aaron · Presley was born in Vernon and Gladys · Presley in Miss Tupper. Luo's 2 bedroom house. His twin brother, Jess Galleon, who died grew up from Elvis as a child. He and his parents moved to Memphis, Tennessee in 1948, and in 1953 Elvis graduated there from Hume 's High School. In 1954, Elvis started his career in Memphis's legendary San Record brand. At the end of 1955, his recording contract was sold to RCA Victor. By 1956, he was an international sensation. That sound and style uniquely combines his diverse musical influences, blurred and challenged the social and ethnic barriers of that era, and created a new era of American music and pop culture. As far as the middle class of the United States, Elvis is a performer nationwide deploying rock music as pop music. Born in Tupelo, Mississippi and raised in Memphis, Elvis worked as a truck driver when found by record producer Sam Phillips. Philips said that he was able to earn "million dollars" if he was recording a black blues actor before and if he could find "black voices and white men feeling white". Elvis Presley fills in the bill This biography focuses on the early life of Elvis Presley. A shy child, Elvis loves to sing at the church and learn to play the guitar. During high school he was interested in music, so he was teased by classmates. As part of his client's promotional campaign, he recorded songs as a surprise gift for his mother's birthday. The studio liked the record and sent it to the local radio station. And that began the rock king career. Lee started writing a letter to Mr. Henchaw writer. Lee is lonely and unhappy. He is a child who recently divorced from his parents, and he stolen the lunch every day and did not have a dog. Mr. Henshaw rewrote to Leigh and encouraged Leigh to have her journal express her feelings. At this exit Leigh was confident. The reader will prefer to see Lee's writing improvements over the four years covered by the book.

Great theorists and philosophers of knowledge networks such as Stoic Sc ​​hool, Skeptics, Aristotle, St. Thomas Aquinas, Descartes, Spinoza, Locke, Hume, Berkeley, Kant, Burt. Lan Russell, Darwin, Freud, and all the science of the 20th century are all working hard on being a matter of knowledge. Do you have knowledge? "Knowing" and "knowledge" are powerful concepts Before receiving text and criticism, I think it is natural that I know what knowledge is. Then, I have a simple question. After reading "American scholars", I remembered that the class was asked "What is the relationship between nature and knowledge?" There is no answer. A consumer-centered knowledge network is a knowledge network that focuses on the knowledge consumers are interested in and controlled by consumers. There must be a very gray portion between all knowledge and consumer-centered knowledge, but knowledge-oriented processes, including consumer interests, are important. The Consumer Knowledge Network is a platform for consumer-centered knowledge-based applications. One of the ongoing discussions is knowledge gathering through knowledge mining (knowledge of mining) and clearly constructed knowledge. Specifically, we wait to convert to an explicit knowledge structure expressed as a semantic web, or automatically generate enough knowledge structures by text mining, data mining, and even knowledge mining ? Consumer-centric knowledge network - Consumer application vision for software agent technology - Implementation of consumer-centered knowledge-based computing The knowledge network is part of the semantic web and focuses on knowledge. A knowledge network is not just a collection of static coding knowledge. Always knowledge is constantly being created through active processes and services. Software agents play an important role in supporting the generation of knowledge networks and new knowledge. Knowledge networks are not just information repositories, they should be viewed as platforms for knowledge - based applications. Consumer-centric knowledge network - Consumer application vision for software agent technology - Implementation of consumer-centered knowledge-based computing Consumer networks are part of a network that focuses on consumer interests compared to consumer networks and consumer knowledge networks become part of the semantic web or knowledge network that focuses on consumer interests Let's see. The consumer web is driven by user navigation, but the consumer knowledge web is driven by the activities of software agents representing consumers. In order to emphasize the center of software agent technology in achieving vision, the assumed network should really be called a consumer / agent knowledge network. Not only is a software agent used for implementation, but each consumer is a consumer / agent knowledge Web as a partnership in which software agents working on behalf of consumers are essentially part of the minds of consumers It is necessary to conceptualize. Consumer-centric knowledge network - Consumer application vision for software agent technology - Implementation of consumer-centered knowledge-based computing

It is widely believed that the problem of evil is the most unfavorable problem for monotheists. This is also the main opposition to the existence of God as a whole. It is easy to understand this question. If God is a perfect omnipotent omnipotent god, why do we live in the imperfections and denial worlds? Why bad things happen? Especially for the good people of the world and for millions of innocent people suffering every day. Gottfreid Leibniz is a philosopher who aims at this problem and wants to point out that evil and the existence of God are compatibility of evil. (1) if God is all-powerful and all-intelligence Since many defenders believe this is a convincing and reasonable criticism of preaching, the problem of evil against religion is rare. Therefore, it is often thought that the problem of evil is one of the greatest threats to religious beliefs, and many religious writers compete for various solutions. "If a single drop of pain taken while looking for an almighty benevolent God's signature is used to gather evidence to darken the creator's role, what range can not be seen in the animal kingdom Devourer and Devourer, most creatures are equipped with prey-tormenting tools There was discussion on Karma theory and how it answers questions of evil and theoretical problems related to it. The problem of evil is an important issue in monotheism and there are two beliefs: (1) there is a god who is absolutely kind and considerate (whole circumference), (2) God absolutely knows everything (no ) I do not know) and they are all powerful (all omnipotent). Then the problem of evil is stated in a statement like "Why are you aware of in the whole world, omnipotence can bring evil and suffering to God?" Max Weber extends evil problems to the oriental tradition Then there is discipline sometimes called "religious philosophy". This is a philosophy of man and discusses some problems that influence religion in philosophy like evil problems ("Why is the world evil if God is holy and omnipotent?" ? "). These questions can be answered only by leaving all our thoughts to God's sovereignty. For example, why does God seek permission for existence? Answer: Punish or forgive it for its own glory. This wonderful fact has a very deep meaning. Of course, since human philosophy is not satisfied with the answer, it invented various irrational alternatives. Epicurus first described the problem of evil in detail. David Hume cited Epicuras in his dialogue on natural religion (1779) to state this argument as a series of questions: "God wants to prevent evil, but he is helpless. Do you have both abilities and intentions, then bad guys, can not he also help? So why do you call him a god? For example, a personal Christian god is logically inconsistent These atheists propose deductive arguments against the existence of God God is a person who is aware of integrity, creative status, immutability, omniscience, versatility, versatility, transcendence, personality (Individual) Does not exist, Unnecessary, Justice, and Mercy