Is it Rational to Believe in God?

But this is also a question to discuss the existence of God. People like me can not choose to believe something that does not prove their existence. I can neither expect nor expect anyone to dedicate their life to anyone who may be just a fairy tale. Likewise, there is no evidence that God exists, but there is no evidence that he does not exist. This is the reason I chose to believe that God is reasonable.

The existence of God has been debated for thousands of years, and important discussions have been carried out. Believing that God is reasonable is another story, just as God confidently believed in himself, this topic brought a lot of debate. It is one thing to discuss whether God is true or not, and it is another matter to discuss whether it is reasonable to believe that God is reasonable. There may be no convincing evidence or evidence that God exists, but I believe it.

Blaise Pascal believes that believing in God is not based on appealing evidence of the existence of God but believing in God for our benefit. Reward, and if he is not, we will rarely or not at all. On the contrary, if we do not believe in God, if he exists, we will receive unlimited punishment in hell, and if he is not, then we will receive little or no Hmm. "Whether you gain unlimited reward in heaven or you get little or no loss", even if there is no evidence "accept unlimited punishment in hell, or get little or not at all" He believes that God is also reasonable. To be present

Hume does not believe that God is "rational", he believes there is no convincing logic to support the existence of God. He seems to appear during a gentle agnosticism - I may not have God - I am not convinced - and a secondaryism - there is a God, but it does not make a big difference to me. But retaliatory thought of God - he does not believe he is in it, so prepare to punish the world after death - he thinks that it is a cruel superstition. The center of Hume is that religious beliefs are not products of reason. Therefore, arguing or opposing it based on the facts does not mention the core problem. It seems particularly ridiculous for Hume that trying to persuade someone to believe or not to believe that there is a completely polished discussion. This is why he is the most important defender of the concept of religious tolerance.

The apostle Paul tells us that God to prove the existence of God does not believe it to be reasonable or rational. In Romans 1:20, he writes that no one excuses not to believe in God, since all creations declare his people. - Historically excellent thinkers and people with revolutionary ideas have changed the world of understanding. The Renaissance people such as Vesalius, William Hervey and Paracelsus revolutionized the understanding of medicine through anatomy and ongoing learning. However, these people have not changed easily, Christian churches are established in their own way and do not want change. People who died for unknown reasons and the church have no answer