Evaluation of Telémakhos’ Actions

Evaluation of the behavior of Telémakhos writers and poets in ancient and contemporary literature praises the behavior of the hero and accuses the actions of evil people - judging this is a praiseworthy act from virtue understanding. If our biggest story is not a confrontation between the opponent and the hero, it is contrary to the struggle of respect and fight of evil. In ancient literature, our understanding of good deeds comes mainly from Aristotle. Because the way of virtue is the middle position, it is "excess and defect middle" (Aristotle 1220).

Behavior Utilitarianism includes a two-step moral evaluation system. (1) to select a specific action, and (2) to evaluate behavior by appealing to general well-being. For example, according to behavioral utilitarian, it is wrong for me to steal a neighbor's car, as this special action leads to more general misfortune. However, rule utilitarianism includes intermediate stages, therefore it is a three-step moral evaluation system. (1) selecting a specific action, (2) evaluating the behavior by relying on moral rules, and (3) evaluating by Moral rules call for standards of general well-being. For example, according to the rule - Utilitarianism, stealing a neighbor's car is wrong. Because this violates the anti-theft rules, we support antitheft rules to promote general happiness

Scottish-Irish philosopher Francis Hatcheison (1694-1747) proposed a systematic formula that ties morality to happiness.

The standard purpose of moral evaluation is "quality", or feature. (As we saw, for Hume, the evaluation of behavior comes from the assessment of essential qualities that we believe to have produced.) Typical moral judgment looks like the kindness or laziness of a certain person Some kind of characteristic virtue or bad habit. For Hume, personality traits are a psychological tendency and usually include a tendency to feel a specific emotional or emotional combination that causes the owner to take action. We will either agree or disapprove by thinking about someone's characteristics in a selfless manner from a common viewpoint and therefore achieve moral judgment. Thus, moral perception is the observer's favorable mood caused by the observer's sort of motivational emotion. Thus, moral perception is a tendency toward emotions or a tendency towards emotions.

What is the moral evaluation of Hume's perspective? The four main explanations have important text support. First of all, as we have seen, the non-propositional view is that Hume does not state any proposition, expression or fact, mentality evaluation thinks evoking emotion or itself is emotion itself . , Bricke). (Hume asserts that the more accurate form of this interpretation allows moral evaluation to have some propositional content, but those basic features as assessments are non-propositional.) Feelings or feelings of the audience is that she thinks about features and actions from a common point of view. In terms of tendency, when a particular trait is said to be good, we attribute this trait to a trend attribute that causes approval.