On Emotion and Value in David Hume and Max Scheler

Summary of David Hume and Max Scheler's emotions and values: Although a philosopher tends to eliminate the importance of every feeling towards moral life, other philosophers tend to devote them to moral life and value judgment It is at the center of the theory. In this article we will discuss two classic positions of the second type, the conflict between Hume and Scherrer's position. The ultimate goal of this conflict is meta theory - in particular it involves analyzing the relationship between emotional concepts and values ​​in this value judgment theory.

Max Scheler (1874-1928) developed philosophical anthropology from the material ethics of value ("Materielle Wertethik") and opposed Emanuel Kant's responsibility ethics ("Pflichtethik"). He explained the hierarchical value system which further develops the phenomenological philosophy. Scheler explains that the human mind is composed of four layers as well as the organic layer. However, in his explanation, the human spirit is opposed by the principle of human spirit. Scheller's philosophy forms the basis of Victor Frankel's logic therapy and existential analysis

From 1900 to 1920 Max Scherrer was the successor to Husserl's phenomenology, which was the hegemonic form of German philosophy of the day. Scherrer tried to apply Husserl's phenomenological approach to various topics. Since 1920, Scherrer has built the foundation of philosophical anthropology competing with phenomenology and other philosophical fields as a philosophical field. Husserl and Martin Heidegger (1889-1976) were then the two most prestigious philosophers in Germany and their criticisms of philosophical anthropology and Scherrer had a great influence on this subject.

Philosophical anthropology is trying to connect various developed anthropology to the specialization of science. Max Scherrer distinguishes science, philosophy, theological anthropology, or interpretation of the basic structure of human activities, but these are ignorant of each other. Philosophical anthropology regards itself as disciplined discipline to prevent "disappearance of the center" of the thought described by that disorder and its followers. Traditional beliefs are broken down under the guidance of God, the king and feudal leader, God or nature, so today there is a lack of general direction. Like Protagoras, men are currently the only viable means. By adjusting and interpreting fragmented knowledge, philosophical anthropology aims to have a new understanding of the basic qualities and possibilities of human beings.