absolute justice

Whether absolute justice exists. This article presents a discussion about the existence of absolute justice. Many people do not agree with the existence of absolute justice. Therefore, because they have contradictions and different forms of justice, we believe that justice can not be derived from nature and can not get bigger and more perfect from smaller and more incomplete ones. This is why the concept of culture and the concept of time justice differ greatly from culture to culture.

The vision of perfect justice comes from Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau, Kant's tradition of enlightenment. They insist on insight into completeness, ideal or absolute justice, based on the theory of social contract. Through contractual means they introduce perfect justice, leave it natural, govern the country according to the law, favor mutual benefits and both sides, and build an ideal society. For Hobbes, Justice is in the hands of the monarch, while Rock Justice exists in the form of individual rights on life, freedom and property. For Rousseau, the individual's general will or social moral collective will in society will form institutional rules that can bring about justice. However, Hume refused to recognize social contract theory because it had no historical evidence of any original contract or other contract. His explanation of justice is based on customs and customs.

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Shailesh_Trivedi2/publication/323239845_International_Conference_On_Role_of_Arts_Culture_Humanities_Religion_Education_Ethics_Philosophy_Spirituality_and_Science_for_Holistic_Societal_Development/links/5a87f22ca6fdcc6b1a3b5f07/International-Conference-On-Role-of-Arts-Culture-Humanities-Religion-Education-Ethics-Philosophy-Spirituality-and- Science, society, development.pdf for the whole

Does absolute justice exist? This article presents a discussion about the existence of absolute justice. Many people do not agree with the existence of absolute justice. Therefore, because they have contradictions and different forms of justice, we believe that justice can not be derived from nature and can not get bigger and more perfect from smaller and more incomplete ones. This is why the concept of culture and the concept of time justice are very different.

This is another case for absolute justice. Their argument allows absolute justice from nature. There is no problem, of course there is a justice system. However, natural justice, more precisely the jungle law is another word of justice, which is consistent with a more powerful profit. This is clearly incomplete justice, as justice and justification are not always strong. Or justice may help a friend and hurt the enemy. Like a group of animals that can not be killed by themselves. Therefore, we see many different forms of justice in nature. Of course, justice can not have different definitions. For example, if there is just for the benefit of a person with a strong justice, it can not help a friend and harm an enemy. (For example, if a friend is an enemy, one acts for the enemy and the other means for your own death, but acts for their own interests.) Justice