George Berkeley

George Berkeley is a philosopher in Ireland. His philosophical belief is focused on one main belief that cognition is the foundation of existence. By doing so, he rejected the concept of the material world that supports the non-material world. What we really understand is what Berkeley learns from the perception of this thing. In the opinion of the materialist, he realized that the real thing is not related to the perception of any perception. Regardless of whether I feel that sensory experience for some reason or not, regardless of whether I see it in the room or not, my pen on my desk will exist.

In this article we will investigate the existence of independent thinking objects based on the work of John Locke and George Berkeley. John Locke considers the existence of objects to be unrelated to our idea, but this does not mean that we do not have to pay a little attention. On the other hand, George Berkeley thinks there are no substances other than thought and concept. Therefore, there is no subject of independent thought. John Locke's reasoning is actually stronger than Berkeley, so coincidence is also the existence of objects of different minds. The argument supported by Locke is that we can determine the limits of our understanding of their existence, because of the ideas we gained from the five senses. First, I will detail in detail how Locke's reasoning supports this argument. Second, I seek to deny any form of material entity in Berkeley, hence the argument that the independent object is not independent.

George Berkeley is one of the three most famous British experiences. (The other two are John Locke and David Hume.) Berkeley presented his early visual work (an article on new visual theory, 1709) and metaphysics (a paper on the principle of human knowledge, 1710; between Hilas and Filonas Dialog, 1713). Berkeley 's empirical vision theory challenges the current distance vision standards, which argues that it requires implicit geometric calculations. His alternative account focuses on visual and tactile objects. Berkeley believes that visual recognition of distance is explained by the interrelationship between vision and tactility. This association method eliminates the attractiveness of geometric computation and explains the illusion of monocular view and moon that plagued the geometric explanation.