Phil. 104 Word Count: Home Test # 1: Essay - 2 John Rawls never argued that he knew the only way to build a society, but he thought of a very reasonable and fair approach. His justice scene is based on two principles of justice. The first principle of his righteousness is that everyone should have the same rights as others. His policy decision is that if there is some inequality, they should benefit everyone and be available to anyone in society. The most argued work by Rawls is his just and free society theory, justice as justice. In the book "Theory of Justice" published by Rawls in 1971, Rolls initially regarded justice as systematic details of justice. Rolls continued to regard fairness as fair in his life while reaffirming this theory in political liberalism (1993), People's Law (1999), and justice and justice (2001). If you are interested in justice evolution that was fair since 1971, please consult Freeman (2007) and Weithman (2011). This article reflects the final statements of Rawls for justification, fairness, political liberalism, and his view on the People's Law. Recent scholarships on Rawls' works are in the following article. In recent years, much of the attention of "fairness" is attributed to John Rawls' work and his "justice is fair" theory. In his book, the theory of justice (1971), Rolls insists that certain principles of justice can be proved by the selection of representatives placed in the context of carefully made artificial choices To do. Rolls employs the hypothetical 'ignorative veil' to ensure that the selection of principles is not affected by people's special interests. Individuals make decisions without knowing their particular identity or attributes, such as economic or social status, religion, gender, age. By expressing individual concerns, when the veil of ignorance is lifted, they are Rawls who choose to protect themselves or 'least privileged' members and become a vulnerable group in society You may turn to the idea. (1971: 12 pages) John Rawls believes that the principle of justice will determine how to distribute social benefits and burdens equally to individuals. Therefore, justice is just for Rawls. But when you live in a country where inequality and interpretation of utopian society are different, consider how people can decide fairness. Rawls believes that the principle of equality must be approved in the same way people call it "the original position." The view of Rawls 'original position' is virtual or imaginary. In other words, individuals do not know their position in life such as race, sex, economy. Rolls then assigns his two principles to this person. He pointed out that basic rights and freedoms should be as wide as possible for all people. According to Mr. Rawls, secondly, social and economic indifference is equal in all positions and should bring the greatest benefit to the poor.

John Rawls (1921-2002) is a modern philosopher who studies justice theory. His theory is not focused on helping individuals deal with ethical dilemmas, but rather in the general concept of thinking how the criminal justice system should function, in the context of liberal democracy Function. This is why all law enforcement officers must understand Rawls' justice theory, or at least they must generally understand the main concept he suggests. Rawls's theory is a liberalism and forms the basis of law enforcement agencies and criminal justice systems to work in a pluralistic free society. With some of the concepts of social contract theory, Rawls imagines a society where social justice establishes the principle of justice. However, Mr. Rawls discovered that social contracts had problems that did not take into account equity and equality among members of the society, thus proposing a social contract to be negotiated behind the "veil of ignorance" . Here, social contracts are fair because negotiating participants do not know what their race, gender, education, health, sexual orientation and other characteristics are. In the final analysis, Rawls believes that the main focus of justice is fairness Rolls has identified the two principles in this paradigm: "Everyone has the same rights as the widest fundamental freedom and is compatible with other similar freedoms" (Rolls, 2006, p. 63). Rolls further allows anyone to engage in activities unless he or she infringes upon the rights of others. "Social and economic inequality will be adjusted so that (a) it is rationally expected that it will benefit everyone belonging to an open position or office to all people "(Lolls, 2006, page 63). Likewise, everyone should share the wealth of society, and everyone should benefit from the distribution of wealth. Rawls does not believe that everyone should receive the same salary, but everyone should benefit from fair income and get a higher paying job. Rawls believes that these principles should be followed to eliminate the same benefits and to ensure that everyone gains justice. Rolls further discusses personal ethics, which is not a central principle of his theory, but to a certain extent is a general statement about how moral people act (Banks, 2013). In 'Justice theory', Rolls' point of view starts with "Justice is the first virtue of the social system". In other words, a good society is a society constructed according to the principle of justice. Rawls argues that the existing justice theory developed in the field of philosophy is not enough: "My guidance goal is a feasible justice that replaces these doctrines that have dominated our philosophical tradition for a long time It is to develop the theory. " His theory - based on social justice - justice as justice, the concept of the basic structure of society Justice theory is a theoretical plan by Rolls to develop a philosophy of justice and to establish a political structure designed to protect social justice and individual freedom. In response to the mainstream utilitarian theory at the time, Rawls wrote that this theory argues that justice is defined as providing the greatest benefit to most people. Rawls is wrapped in a veil of ignorance and proposes a theoretical person who must design a fair society without having to predict his or her identity in society. Mr. Rawl believes that from an objective standpoint he will call the original position, the individual will choose a justice system to provide sufficient conditions for people at the lowest level of society. Individuals will do this as he or she may wish to obtain sufficient rewards at such a disadvantage. Rolls defined fairness as fair within the scope of its original position in "justice theory" and hence tried to define established moral ethics. Rawls's theory puts individual freedom at an equal position to explain utilitarian flaws. In spite of Sandell's criticism, Rawls as justice of impartiality theory fully

John Rawls's "justice theory" is a work of establishing social rules to maximize the rational and selfless individuals in their original position and to maximize the happiness of their lives select their principle of justice I believe that you can do. b) To resolve the social and economic disparity through equality of universal opportunities that are most beneficial to the society's most disadvantaged position. Rawls' social creation system has advantages and disadvantages, but in the end it is healthy. Since its introduction in 1971, John Rawls's "justice" has become classical. The author has modified the original to remove some of the difficulties encountered by him and others in the original book. Rawls's purpose is to express an important part of the common core of democratic tradition - justice as fairness - to provide an alternative to utilitarianism which has dominated Anglo-Saxon's political thought tradition since the 19th century It is that. Rolls replaced the ideal of social contract with a more satisfying explanation of the basic rights of citizens as freedom and equality and freedom. "Everyone" wrote that "Even if it can not exceed the happiness of society as a whole, it has an invincible sense based on justice." That theory advancing Rawls, Lewis, Lincoln's ideas is as powerful as it was first announced. A 762 John Rawls Justice of Justice (1967) As explained by Britain's great moral philosopher Thomas Hobbes, social contracts show that justice benefits as much as possible in society, and in compliance with all It depends. Rolls adds to this concept by obliging contracts to include contracts to protect the weak and the poor, and to deal with those who justly own and control society. 7 pp.A585 mordecai richler 1944: I learned to love Germans (1986) Jewish novelist reminds me that on the darkest day of the Holocaust, he read a book about German soldiers The book has changed his understanding of the power of the Germans. Universality of book and human experience 7 pages

This means that similar crimes have different solutions because the situation of each crime and the persons involved are different. In addition, traditional justice crimes are easily punished as they conform to traditional models. Suppose that he is calling someone a black man and making many contemptial remarks so people are charged with racial discrimination. Although the philosophy of Rawlsian did not reach the conclusion, he tried to understand the situation according to various methods and pondered some case-specific variables. A 762 John Rawls Justice of Justice (1967) As explained by Britain's great moral philosopher Thomas Hobbes, social contracts show that justice benefits as much as possible in society, and in compliance with all It is taking. Rolls adds to this concept by obliging contracts to include contracts to protect the weak and the poor, and to deal with those who justly own and control society. 7 pp.A585 mordecai richler 1944: I learned to love Germans (1986) Jewish novelist reminds me that on the darkest day of the Holocaust, he read a book about German soldiers The book has changed his understanding of the power of the Germans. Universality of book and human experience 7 pages Since its introduction in 1971, John Rawls's "justice" has become classical. The author has modified the original to remove some of the difficulties encountered by him and others in the original book. Rawls's purpose is to express an important part of the common core of democratic tradition - justice as fairness - to provide an alternative to utilitarianism which has dominated Anglo-Saxon's political thought tradition since the 19th century It is that. Rolls replaced the ideal of social contract with a more satisfying explanation of the basic rights of citizens as freedom and equality and freedom. "Everyone" wrote that "Even if it can not exceed the happiness of society as a whole, it has an invincible sense based on justice." That theory advancing Rawls, Lewis, Lincoln's ideas is as powerful as it was first announced. In the academic and political philosophy of Britain and the United States, John Rawls's "justice theory" announced in 1971 is considered a landmark event. Rawls used the thought experiment, the original position. There, the representative party chose the principle of justice for the basic structure of society from veil ignorance. Mr. Rawl also raised criticism of the Utilitarian approach to political justice. "Anarchy", "National", "Utopia" of Robert Nozick published in 1974 won the National Book Award, answered Rolls from the liberal point of view, acquired liberalism. Academic aspect

In "Theory of Justice", John Rawls believes that justice as justice is a better justice theory than John Stuart Mill's utilitarianism. Rawls believes that under the original position assumption, rational individuals will choose to follow his two principles of just as fair. Mill proposed a theory of justice in utilitarianism. Muller believes that justice is emotion. I will summarize the discussion of Mill and Rawls on our sense of justice. Let us explain how Rawls opposes Muller's justice, because Utilitarianism can not severely distinguish people. In "justice theory", Rawls first stated that "justice is the first virtue of the social system", which means that a good society is a society constructed according to the principle of justice. Rawls argues that existing theory of justice developed in the field of philosophy is not enough. His theory is aimed at formulating the concept of a social basic structure based on social justice - justice as justice. Justice theory is a theoretical plan by Rawls to develop a philosophy of justice and attempt to establish a political structure aimed at supporting social justice and individual freedom. In response to the mainstream utilitarian theory at the time, Rawls wrote that this theory argues that justice is defined as providing the greatest benefit to most people. Rawls is wrapped in a veil of ignorance and proposes a theoretical person who must design a fair society without having to predict his or her position in society. Mr. Rawl believes that from the objective point of view he will call the original position, the individual will choose the system of justice to provide sufficient conditions for the lowest level people in society. Individuals will do this as he or she may wish to obtain sufficient rewards at such a disadvantage.

Humans have natural instincts and can justify it even if they do not understand it. It is a product of psychological reasoning. Everyone wants the same treatment. The jurisdictional area covers a wide range of equality, mainly. "Everyone has equal rights to enjoy the broadest fundamental freedom that is compatible with others like freedom" (Rolls 60). This sentence is the first justice principle of John Rawls' justice theory. Equality is important to society in order to keep everyone in sync with others in other racial, ethical or wealth situations. In "justice theory", Rawls first stated that "justice is the first virtue of the social system", which means that a good society is a society constructed according to the principle of justice. Rawls argues that existing theory of justice developed in the field of philosophy is not enough. His theory is aimed at formulating the concept of a social basic structure based on social justice - justice as justice. According to modern justice theory, justice is the most important. John Rawls claims that "Justice is the first morality of the social system, because truth is an ideology." , Charity, compassion, generosity, compassion. Traditionally, justice is related to fate, reincarnation, or the concept of sacred Providence, a life that is consistent with the plan of the universe. Therefore, the relationship between justice and fairness is rare in history and culture, perhaps primarily modern innovation. First, "justice as a virtue" is ambiguous between personal and social uses. Rawls regards justice as "the first virtue of the social system" (1971, 3 pages), but Rawls is not the first person to view justice as a social system or social virtue - Plato early it is in front of him Existed. But since the justice as social, political and institutional virtue has been solved elsewhere, the focus of this article will be justice as a personal virtue. In other words, since individuals usually live as members of a political community, justice as a social aspect of virtue will not last long.

John Rawls's "justice theory" is a rational, selfless individual who was originally in a position and was given the task of establishing social rules to maximize her happy life, To ensure fundamental freedom that we believe that we can choose as a budget, and b) to eliminate social and economic disparity through equality of equal opportunities of the world. This is most beneficial to the most disadvantaged people in society. Rolls established a social cbfgdbre system to maintain fundamental freedom, equal opportunities, and support for vulnerable groups. Since its introduction in 1971, John Rawls's "justice" has become classical. The author has modified the original to remove some of the difficulties encountered by him and others in the original book. Rawls's purpose is to express an important part of the common core of democratic tradition - justice as fairness - to provide an alternative to utilitarianism which has dominated Anglo-Saxon's political thought tradition since the 19th century It is that. Rolls replaced the ideal of social contract with a more satisfying explanation of the basic rights of citizens as freedom and equality and freedom. "Everyone" wrote that "Even if it can not exceed the happiness of society as a whole, it has an invincible sense based on justice." That theory advancing Rawls, Lewis, Lincoln's ideas is as powerful as it was first announced. A 762 John Rawls Justice of Justice (1967) As explained by Britain's great moral philosopher Thomas Hobbes, social contracts show that justice benefits as much as possible in society, and in compliance with all It depends. Rolls adds to this concept by obliging contracts to include contracts to protect the weak and the poor, and to deal with those who justly own and control society. 7 pp.A585 mordecai richler 1944: I learned to love Germans (1986) Jewish novelist reminds me that on the darkest day of the Holocaust, he read a book about German soldiers The book has changed his understanding of the power of the Germans. Universality of book and human experience 7 pages In the academic and political philosophy of Britain and the United States, John Rawls's "justice theory" announced in 1971 is considered a landmark event. Rawls used the thought experiment, the original position. There, the representative party chose the principle of justice for the basic structure of society from veil ignorance. Mr. Rawl also raised criticism of the Utilitarian approach to political justice. "Anarchy", "National", "Utopia" of Robert Nozick published in 1974 won the National Book Award, answered Rolls from the liberal point of view, acquired liberalism. Academic aspect

Rawls as a concept of political justice: Summary of defense against critics: Rawls' justice theory as a center of impartiality, the principle of justice necessary for constitutional democracy, is not considered inclusive but is regarded as politics Moral, philosophical or religious teachings that should be. Although the concept of justice does not exist in the preemptive moral order, it exists in us, but because it is more than a model for politics to embody overlapping, our concept of justice Match with self-understanding. I have a consensus ethical foundation. Justice theory has been criticized by several philosophers. Robert Nozick criticized the description of distributive justice in Rolls' liberalism, anarchicism, nationalism, advocacy of utopia (1974). In an article published in the American Political Science Review of 1975, Alan Bloom pointed out that the "justice theory" has attracted more people than any generation in the Anglo-Saxon world. "Paying more attention to such works" means that the "most ambitious" political project by school members currently dominant in academic philosophy and radical extremism of that liberal democracy It is based on interpretation. Bloom criticized Rawls as not explaining the existence of natural rights in his theory of justice, Rawls said he turned the social association to the ultimate goal and boasted everything as a skill. Rawls as a concept of political justice: Summary of defense against critics: Rawls' justice theory as a center of impartiality, the principle of justice necessary for constitutional democracy, is not considered inclusive but is regarded as politics Moral, philosophical or religious teachings that should be. - The United States Public Relations Association's Code of Ethics has a foundation, that is, there are members' professional values. These values ​​include advocacy, honesty, expertise, independence, loyalty, and fairness. The PRSA Membership Code of Ethics also includes six provisions: vocational enhancement, conflict of interest, assurance of confidence, disclosure of information, competition and free information flow.

In the theory of justice, John Rawls proposes his argument about justice and inequality. Rawls believes that in the first position people assume the hypothetical state of reasoning without prejudice and they will agree to live in society based on the two principles of justice (Rolls 1971, 4) . These two principles of justice are called the first and second principles. The first is the principle of equal rights and freedom. The second is the principle of differences and the principle of equality of opportunity for fairness, or a combination of FEOP (Rolls 1971, 53). John Rawls's "justice theory" proposes an ideal society based on several simple principles. The system recommended by Rawls is well constructed, but it is not without flaws. I will explain the concept of justice and fairness of Rawls and explain why the system failed. John Rawls proposed a state of theoretical human nature, he called it the original state. - The idea of ​​stupidity and its contents are related to the struggle of why things happen to people. Why bad people do bad things, bad things happen to bad people. There is no fair rule in the world. It exists, but it is not what we want. This can be seen in the Dostoevsky underground memo. In the last year of his school, he will be the legacy of about 200 serfs. To brag In his "justice theory", John Rawls uses discussions of social contracts to prove the distribution of justice, in particular justice, which is just form. That is fair distribution of goods. Rawls denies that we all know our character, social position, moral qualities, wealth, talent and plan of life, and we will consider what kind of justice theory we choose when we are veiled We deny asking and manage our society. To do its best for yourself, I will cancel it. We do not know who we are, so we can not decide our wishes. Therefore ignorance determines the fairness of the model to eliminate selfish prejudice. Rawls suggests that each of us is rejecting Utilitarian theory of justice, that is, we may become a person who sacrifices their own interests for the benefit of others, so we maximize welfare We should assert that.

Humans have natural instincts and can justify it even if they do not understand it. It is a product of psychological reasoning. Everyone wants the same treatment. The jurisdictional area covers a wide range of equality, mainly. "Everyone has equal rights to enjoy the broadest fundamental freedom that is compatible with others like freedom" (Rolls 60). This sentence is the first justice principle of John Rawls' justice theory. Equality is important to society in order to keep everyone in sync with others in other racial, ethical or wealth situations. In "justice theory", Rawls first stated that "justice is the first virtue of the social system", which means that a good society is a society constructed according to the principle of justice. Rawls argues that existing theory of justice developed in the field of philosophy is not enough. His theory is aimed at formulating the concept of a social basic structure based on social justice - justice as justice. According to modern justice theory, justice is the most important. John Rawls claims that "Justice is the first morality of the social system, because truth is an ideology." , Charity, compassion, generosity, compassion. Traditionally, justice is related to fate, reincarnation, or the concept of sacred Providence, a life that is consistent with the plan of the universe. Therefore, the relationship between justice and fairness is rare in history and culture, perhaps primarily modern innovation. First, "justice as a virtue" is ambiguous between personal and social uses. Rawls regards justice as "the first virtue of the social system" (1971, 3 pages), but Rawls is not the first person to view justice as a social system or social virtue - Plato early it is in front of him Existed. But since the justice as social, political and institutional virtue has been solved elsewhere, the focus of this article will be justice as a personal virtue. In other words, since individuals usually live as members of a political community, justice as a social aspect of virtue will not last long.

John Rawls's "justice theory" proposes an ideal society based on several simple principles. The system recommended by Rawls is well constructed, but it is not without flaws. I will explain the concept of justice and fairness of Rawls and explain why the system failed. John Rawls proposed a state of theoretical human nature, he called it the original state. In this original position, everyone gathers and needs to form a good society, and everyone is treated fairly. Political philosophers are thinking about what an ideal society is like. Perhaps the most famous expression of this ideal is in Theory of Justice of John Rawls. Here, Rawls introduces the concept of good social order. An orderly society is a society where all of us accept the same principle of justice and the basic institution of our society is bound by these principles. Mr. Rawl thinks that being an ideal society is also an orderly society. John Rawls's "justice theory" proposes an ideal society based on several simple principles. The system recommended by Rawls is well constructed, but it is not without flaws. I will explain the concept of justice and fairness of Rawls and explain why the system failed. John Rawls proposed a state of theoretical human nature, he called it the original state. - The idea of ​​stupidity and its contents are related to the struggle of why things happen to people. Why bad people do bad things, bad things happen to bad people. There is no fair rule in the world. It exists, but it is not what we want. This can be seen in the Dostoevsky underground memo. In the last year of his school, he will be the legacy of about 200 serfs. To brag

John Rawls's "justice theory" proposes an ideal society based on several simple principles. The system recommended by Rawls is well constructed, but it is not without flaws. I will explain the concept of justice and fairness of Rawls and explain why the system failed. John Rawls proposed a state of theoretical human nature, he called it the original state. In this original position, everyone gathers and needs to form a good society, and everyone is treated fairly. Political philosophers are thinking about what an ideal society is like. Perhaps the most famous expression of this ideal is in Theory of Justice of John Rawls. Here, Rawls introduces the concept of good social order. An orderly society is a society where all of us accept the same principle of justice and the basic institution of our society is bound by these principles. Mr. Rawl thinks that being an ideal society is also an orderly society. John Rawls's "justice theory" proposes an ideal society based on several simple principles. The system recommended by Rawls is well constructed, but it is not without flaws. I will explain the concept of justice and fairness of Rawls and explain why the system failed. John Rawls proposed a state of theoretical human nature, he called it the original state. - The idea of ​​stupidity and its contents are related to the struggle of why things happen to people. Why bad people do bad things, bad things happen to bad people. There is no fair rule in the world. It exists, but it is not what we want. This can be seen in the Dostoevsky underground memo. In the last year of his school, he will be the legacy of about 200 serfs. To brag

Rawls proposed a theory of political social contract based on the principle of justice as justice; its aim is to create a procedural principle of "social basic structure". The basic structure of the Rawlsian society includes all the political, social and economic systems of society, and how they are integrated into a unified whole. Principle Rawls states that the first principle of modern systems is "justice is fair", focusing on the distribution of fundamental social goods such as rights, products, obligations, freedoms, how to sing and how to sing are specified I have not. Born in Baltimore, Maryland in 1921, John Rawls is the second son of Baltimore's most influential attorney, William Lee Rolls and his wife, Anna Abel Stewart Rolls. . When young, Rawls and his family were shocked by two tragedies. When he was eight years old, Rawls developed infectious bacterial diphtheria. He recovered but his younger brother infected with a disease from him did not die due to complications. A year later, Rolls suffered from pneumonia. Another brother died of being infected with him. John Bordley Rawls is one of the most influential philosophers of the 20th century. He was born on February 21, 1921, the son of Baltimore, Maryland, William Lee Rolls and Anna Abel (stump). Rawls received a Bachelor of Arts degree from Princeton University in 1943. During World War II, he worked in the military and was stationed in the Pacific Ocean. From 1947 to 1948 he studied at Cornell University and in 1950 received a PhD in Princeton University. In 1949, he married Margaret Warfield Fox with four children. John Rawls is a 20th century American philosopher specializing in the fields of ethics, political philosophy, and law philosophy. Rawls is considered by many as the most important political philosopher of the 20th century and his symbolic "justice" is trying to combine many competitive political theories that are thought to be incompatible It is praised for what he did. In the nineteenth century, political philosophy divided Karl Marx's radical equalityism and concept of individual freedom and freedom acknowledged by John Stuart Mill. Rolls rejected Marx's communism and Mill's utilitarianism, returned to the early modern social contract model, and was influenced by Rock, Rousseau, Hume, and Kant and formed his own theoretical version . Rawls' philosophy has been widely praised, but it produced two books contrary to justice theory.

This content is available through online browsing (free) program dependent on page scan. Screen readers can not currently scan, so please contact JSTOR user support for access. We will provide PDF copy of your screen reader In the Republic of Plato, Plato considers the question "What is justice?" Plato's goal is to prove that justice (or "virtue") is worthy of itself. To prove his theory, Plato mainly deals with social political justice, then he develops personal justice. Socrates was a Plato teacher; hence Plato used Socrates as a republican philosopher. Some of the ideas mentioned in the book may have been proposed by Socrates, and some are the result of Plato's idea. His concept of justice in the Republic of Plato is an abstract concept and Socrates is trying to create it with a midwife. In fact, the argument about Plato's justice begins with an appearance, but his main purpose is to examine all internal structures of the human soul, then examine social classes and reveal the essence of justice. In contrast, for Rawls, the social reality and the economic and social situation of the present society are more important. Rawls' justice view is not as psychological as Plato. Two books, "Theory of Justice" and "Justice is Justice", he studied the legitimacy of socio-economic and social reality. Justice is always an important issue in the history of philosophy. The concept of justice in Greece is the virtue of the soul and action. For Plato and Aristotle, justice means goodness and willingness to comply with the law. It means correspondence between rights and obligations. Justice is ideal for interpersonal relationships. For Plato, "Justice is one of the best virtues (Bhandari, 2002) Justice for Greeks is motivating people in the proper implementation of their duties.

American philosopher John Rolls and European philosopher Victor Frankel are highly appreciated by their philosophical wisdom. When Rawls focused on justice theory, Frankel's work was moving in a direction to find meaning in life. Although their work takes a different direction, their work is clearly correlated as they are related to moral and moral development. Rawls talked about the four roles of political philosophy, including the following, in his writings. 1) Practice - Discover rationale for rational discussion. The philosopher who supports the contractual moral philosophy is Harvard philosopher John Rawls, whose "justice theory" is the most influential philosophical ethical text of the past 30 years. The contractual approach of Rawls is completely different from Gosier and Herman's approach in that it is inspired by Rock, Rousseau and Kant, not from Hosible. Rawls first considered the parties' initial position to consider the correct code of conduct that would be universally applicable in society. In the negotiations, the political party is just, that is, the interests of all people equal. It is guaranteed by the so-called ignorative veil which hides its own knowledge of the contractor. Behind ignorance, I do not know race, sex, social class, nationality. Perhaps the most powerful concept of moral philosophy is the "vulgar of ignorance" advocated by John Rawls. Imagine you must develop a social law that prevents you from knowing who you are in the world when you face veil (politician, beggar, businessman, refugee, everyone knows Absent). Rawls said that it is only in this veil of ignorance that people can truly develop the law of justice. Revealing these concepts at university will make people more aware of the potential threat posed by their ideas and will be responsible for their actions. Everyone must have their own moral values. This is very important in the world where innovative technology inventions are announced every month.

In this thesis, I will learn about Monsanto through John Rawls' theory and function examples. Monsanto is the most famous company in the agricultural industry. Today they are known as genetically modified organisms (GMOs), which change the way they recognize how to purchase and consume our food. Many countries in the world strongly oppose GMO and Monsanto, and they are forbidden to sell their products. However, America and North America are genetically modified organisms. The US may be misunderstanding as if Monsanto pretends to share the cake equally. The general public does not know much about Rolls' private life. The longest biography I met was the Thomas Pogge John Rawls 23-page chapter. The theory of his life and justice. For me, throughout an important moment in the life of Rawls, the luck of luck is very thorough. This is part of the episode of the Bog chapter. During the Second World War, John Rawls was a member of the Pacific Theater Reconnaissance Team. He spent 2 years in New Guinea, Philippines, and 4 months in Japan. He died almost in the Philippines. Rolls took off his helmet and took a bite of water from the river. A sniper fired at him and missed it - the bullet rubbed Rolls Royce John Rawls' justice theory is an example of the most widely cited contract theory, but before we outline, we need two cautious words. First, the form of theory evolved from Rolls' first incarnation (1958) to his main work "Theory of justice" (Rolls 1971) and Rawls (1993) and Rawls. (2001). Secondly, Rawls has always insisted that the principle of justice he defends is the principle chosen by people in the "original position" of the appropriate design required to choose the social and political system they live in His theory became a contractor - the importance of the role of the contract itself is unclear in his own mind. His principles being discussed elsewhere (see John Rawls' article), even if they prove that their contractual basis is incomplete, they may be considered as social justice theory in the modern free society It can be justified according to its own advantages. Since its introduction in 1971, John Rawls's "justice" has become classical. The author has modified the original to remove some of the difficulties encountered by him and others in the original book. Rawls's purpose is to express an important part of the common core of democratic tradition - justice as fairness - to provide an alternative to utilitarianism which has dominated Anglo-Saxon's political thought tradition since the 19th century It is that. Rolls replaced the ideal of social contract with a more satisfying explanation of the basic rights of citizens as freedom and equality and freedom. "Everyone" wrote that "Even if it can not exceed the happiness of society as a whole, it has an invincible sense based on justice." That theory advancing Rawls, Lewis, Lincoln's ideas is as powerful as it was first announced.

Justice is regarded as a concept that balances law and morality. Laws that support social harmony are considered fair. Rawls believes that justice is the first morality of the social system; this means that a good society is a society constructed according to the principle of justice. The importance of the principle of justice is to provide a way to assign rights and obligations to the basic system of society and to decide the proper allocation of social benefits and burdens. Rawlos distinguishes the three levels of publicity: first, the principle of propaganda justice; secondly, the advertisement of general beliefs based on the first acceptable principle of justice ("the theory of humanity and social institution" ); Third, the perfect validity of the concept of advertising justice is exactly the same as itself. Rawls believes that these three levels are reflected in an orderly society. This is the condition of "full publicity" Nozick believes that a more appropriate theory of justice will enumerate the three principles of justice. The first principle is the principle of justice in acquisitions, which is the occupation of natural resources that have never been possessed. Some of the most famous of these principles, some of the versions that Nozick seems to support are the principles embodied in Locke's property theory, according to which (as self-owners ) "Own labor power mixes" owns parts of nature not previously possessed (for example, cut spears found in the forest and nurture spears) and possesses it. The second principle is the principle of justice relocation. This manages how one person can equitably own what previously owned by another person. The last principle is the principle of justice in correcting and adjusting past injustices in setting up rights in acquisitions and assignments. Nozick distinguishes the principle of justice right from the principle of pattern. "The distribution specifies that it will change in some natural dimensions, a weighted sum of natural dimensions, or a lexicographic order of natural dimensions", the principle is patterned. The distribution determined by people's age, skin color, needs and benefits, or a combination of these is patterned. Nozick argues that "almost all proposed principles of distributive justice are modeled" (1974, 156).

Following frequent corporate mergers, downsides and restructuring, today's workers face increasing threats such as unemployment, employment insecurity and lack of employment opportunities. In this article, we will explore how US corporate and social work experts are responding to the impact of current workplace confusion, worker deportation, and distribution justice on individuals and businesses. Emphasis is placed on the historical development of the role of EAP social workers and contribution to the distribution of justice in the workplace. What came from this discussion is a comprehensive model that combines EAP and organization development (OD). The development of this EAP / OD model arises from the belief that workers who have strong self-esteem and reasonable expectation for sustained employment are indicators of productive employees and are actually an example of justice of distribution It is. Rawls' research led to much more general research on distributed justice and social justice, but in recent years various strategies emerged focusing on justice as a personal virtue. These strategies differ in the two aspects we consider, seriously dealing with the relationship between the institution and the personal form of justice, treating the latter among virtues as (and other) virtues. One strategy is Jon Drydyk. He is based on the "capacity approach" of human welfare, and provides reasons for justifying capacity-based individual agents, especially for the "Aristotle" approach, which emphasizes justice. It is correspondence to merit. Legitimate actions include "efforts to reduce and eliminate inequalities of people's ability to function in some way in real human life" (Drydyk 2012, pp. 31, 33). The theory of justice is the political philosophy and ethics of John Rawls and the author is trying to solve the problem of distributive justice (distribution of social justice in society) using variants of devices familiar to society. I will sign a contract. The resulting theory is called "justice is fair" and Rawls derives his two principles of justice. Together they decide that the structure of society should give as much freedom to its members as possible and that the freedom of one member should not violate the concept of freedom of any other member . Secondly, whether social or economic, inequality is only allowed if the worst case is better than the average allocation. Finally, in the presence of such favorable inequality, this inequality should not make it difficult for people without resources to occupy power.

An overview of John Rawls and social contract. John Rawls combines the earlier traditional social contract approach with more modern usage to create a chaotic social philosophical renaissance. Professor Rawls is not a reason to advocate civic authority or a form to adopt, but I am more interested in the principle of promoting a basic social system - though it assumes authority, but focuses on animation I am counting on you. In short, Rawls believes that "justice and fairness" should be the basic animation principle. The social contract theory began as a description of the origins and legitimacy of the country, especially in the works of Hobbes and Rock, but later thinkers like Rousseau, Emmanuel Kant and John Rawls also applied social contract theory. On the international stage (partly explains Grotius's international justice in the "Law of War and Peace"). In these applications, the state replaces citizens as parties to social contracts. The judicial part of social contract theory is based on the international treaties such as "Geneva Convention on Prisoner Handling" (if the country agrees with humanitarian treatment of prisoners) or the right to UN human rights declaration (States promise to realize various human rights) Can be used to review the provisions of the Convention In 1971, John Rawls promoted social contracts to regain attention by announcing the "justice theory". Later, he extended the model of "justice theory" to the international stage of the People's Law. Rawls uses a social contract model. And that calls him "justice and fairness" in the context of the country and "people's rule" at the international stage. Rawls' statement is purely normative and does not pretend to be an accurate descriptive statement about how each country interacts indeed. He explained his argument as the "ideal theory" of pursuing "realistic utopia." John Rawls' view of civil disobedience is different from Martin Luther King. He believes democracy is a social contract. He does not believe that people are "groups" with individual identities. In fact, Rawls argues that in democratic society, people who originally signed a social contract did not know their social, economic, or ethnic differences. He called it "pure veil" (Rolls). The primitive principle of these hypotheses agrees with the form of governance that treats everyone equally according to law. Since this contract includes democracy, a constitution is necessary. This includes the legislators who are responsible for making the law. Sometimes the law is unfair. However, as part of social contracts, citizens also signed the profit that democracy provides to them. As a result, citizens must comply with unfair laws

John Rawls' social contract theory challenges Utilitarianism by pointing out an impractical theory. In the Utilitarian society, civil rights can be completely ignored if corruption against this citizen benefits others in society. Rawls believes that social contract theory similar to that proposed by Hobbes, Rock, Rousseau is a more reasonable solution to the fairness of every government. A general social contract theory, including Rawls' perspective, is that in a society where self-interest, rationality, and equality are established, rules of justice are established by mutually reinforcing things. Political philosopher John Rawls uses the Utilitarian view of Bentham and Mill, the concept of social contract of John Rock, and the concept of absolute command of Kant. "Even if we can not exceed happiness of society as a whole, everyone has force majeure based on justice.Therefore, justice denies losing freedom Kant against building Kant's justice in an absolute way The moral proposition which denied the moral interest of Mr. His view is clearly reconfirmed in political liberalism and the society is "a system of fair cooperation from one generation to the next as time goes by" It is seen. John Rolls and Utilitarian Heath C. Hawklock John Rawls' social contract theory challenges Utilitarianism by pointing out an impractical theory. In the Utilitarian society, civil rights can be completely ignored if corruption against this citizen benefits others in society. Rawls believes that social contract theory similar to that proposed by Hobbes, Rock, Rousseau is a more logical solution to the fairness of all governments. Since its introduction in 1971, John Rawls's "justice" has become classical. The author has modified the original to remove some of the difficulties encountered by him and others in the original book. Rawls's purpose is to express an important part of the common core of democratic tradition - justice as fairness - to provide an alternative to utilitarianism which has dominated Anglo-Saxon's political thought tradition since the 19th century It is that. Rolls replaced the ideal of social contract with a more satisfying explanation of the basic rights of citizens as freedom and equality and freedom. "Everyone" wrote that "Even if it can not exceed the happiness of society as a whole, it has an invincible sense based on justice." That theory advancing Rawls, Lewis, Lincoln's ideas is as powerful as it was first announced.

Human Rights and John Rawls People's Law Legislation: Which political and judicial foundation can prove the transition from the West to the general in particular? John Rawls tried to answer this question in his article "People's Law" and proposed a contract or agreement. The free and democratic society should reach the first agreement on several political and social issues such as human rights. Then this agreement can be extended to the society that is necessary to satisfy peace with an organizational legal system that admits freedom and democracy but an organized hierarchical society, or to some extent freedom - politics and religion John Rawls introduced the concept of human rights politics in his book "People's Law" (Rolls 1999). The basic idea is to determine what the human rights are and what they need by determining the main role that human rights fulfills in a particular political field. In the People's Law, this field is international relations (followed by the politics of the country). An attempt by Rawls to rectify international law and politics in today's international system will help Rawls explain how to focus on how human rights works in this system. Human rights in interpersonal relationship does not belong to this field John Rawls is a 20th century American philosopher specializing in the fields of ethics, political philosophy, and law philosophy. Rawls is considered by many as the most important political philosopher of the 20th century and his symbolic "justice" is trying to combine many competitive political theories that are thought to be incompatible It is praised for what he did. In the nineteenth century, political philosophy divided Karl Marx's radical equalityism and concept of individual freedom and freedom acknowledged by John Stuart Mill. Rolls rejected Marx's communism and Mill's utilitarianism, returned to the early modern social contract model, and was influenced by Rock, Rousseau, Hume, and Kant and formed his own theoretical version . Rawls' philosophy has been widely praised, but it produced two books contrary to justice theory.

This book is a revised version of "Justice Theory" published by Harvard University Press in 1971. Since publication in 1971, the "justice theory" has been translated into 23 languages. Since 1975, the translation of the original text of English is included in the translation. All of these revisions are included in this new English version. These are considered to be greatly improved, especially for free and primary products. In the revised version of the revised edition, the revised edition is explained in detail. Since its introduction in 1971, John Rawls's "justice theory" has become classical. The author has modified the original to eliminate some difficulties encountered by him and others in the original book. Rawls's purpose is to express an important part of the common core of democratic tradition - justice as justice - to provide an alternative to utilitarianism which has dominated Anglo-Saxon's political and ideological tradition since the 19th century is. Rawl replaced the ideal of social contract with a more satisfying interpretation of citizen's basic rights and freedom as freedom and equality. Mr. Rawls wrote, "Even if we can not go beyond the welfare of everyone, we have an invincible sense based on justice," he wrote. That theory is as powerful as it was first announced. The result of the ongoing revision process is an important element of Rawls composition style. Critics often comment on the "justice theory" as a representative of Roles' ongoing philosophical theory process, which has lasted for about 40 years. The "Justice theory" first published in 1971 is mainly composed mainly of revised articles previously published in academic journals by Rawls, some of which dates back to 1958. Therefore, people observed development and improvement of his ideas during 1958. -1971 can be tracked in the text of the book. In addition, Rolls made a major revision of "Justice theory" ready to translate it to other languages ​​in 1975; however, these modifications were not included in the English version of the text until 1999 did. Rolls pointed out that "the translated version was better than the original version" until the 1999 version.

Rawl attempts to define justice as fairness within the original position in "justice theory", hence establishing moral ethics. Rawls's theory puts individual freedom at an equal position to account for Utilitarian flaws. In spite of Sandell's criticism, Raws' justice as a fair theory fully protects the redistribution system of society as a whole and solves the problem of inequality in luck. In "Theory of justice" Rawls tried to use justice as a theory of fairness to provide alternative to utilitarian and intuitive beliefs. John Rawls's book "Justice theory" is based on contributions to justice, and has priority over social arrangements and goods. Rawls, in particular in the allocation of social goods, defines fairness as fair, defines fairness from a procedural perspective, and proves that only institutions and life are good if rational individual goods are fairly considered I will try. An important invention of Rawls is its original position, a process of trying to make objective moral decisions by refusing individual facts to enter personal moral calculations. In recent years, much of the attention of "fairness" is attributed to John Rawls' work and his "justice is fair" theory. In his book, the theory of justice (1971), Rawls argued that certain principles of justice can be proved by the selection of representatives placed in the context of carefully made artificial choices I will. Rolls employs the hypothetical 'ignorative veil' to ensure that the selection of principles is not affected by people's special interests. Individuals make decisions without knowing their particular identity or attributes, such as economic or social status, religion, gender, age. By expressing individual concerns, when the veil of ignorance is released, they are Rose who chooses to protect them or to become "wealthy" members and to become a vulnerable group in society You may turn to the idea of. (1971: 12 pages)

John Rowells - Life and Thought Modern Philosopher John Bodley Rawls provides moral theory to the liberal world and puts the concept of justice at the center of its concentration. John Rawls is one of the most influential political philosophers of the 20th century after the Second World War. Rawls published his first book, the theory of justice, in 1971. And it is widely regarded as his best work and the most important political philosophy. Rawlsism, the philosophical foundation of Rawls, was aimed at challenging the principle of utilitarianism, so he received strong opposition from strong support. John Bordley Rawls is one of the most influential philosophers of the 20th century. He was born on February 21, 1921, the son of Baltimore, Maryland, William Lee Rolls and Anna Abel (stump). Rawls received a Bachelor of Arts degree from Princeton University in 1943. During World War II, he worked in the military and was stationed in the Pacific Ocean. From 1947 to 1948 he studied at Cornell University and in 1950 received a PhD in Princeton University. In 1949, he married Margaret Warfield Fox with four children. John Bordley Rawls was born and bred and raised in Baltimore, Maryland, USA. His family is comfortable, but his young man experienced a tragedy twice. For the second consecutive year, his two younger brothers were infected with infection - one died in diphtheria and the other died of pneumonia. The vividness of arbitrariness of role wealth may be due to this initial experience. His remaining brothers are excellent athletes who are studying undergraduate degrees at Princeton University. Rolls took his brother to Princeton. Rawls is playing baseball but he is at least discreet in his future life for him or any other project for his success. Bordley is an American philosopher, a professor of philosophy at Harvard University, and author of many books including his great "justice". He is widely regarded as one of the most important philosophers of the 20th century and is widely recognized for his contribution to liberal political philosophy. In "Justice theory", Rawls uses the resources of human deliberation to describe what he thinks is the principle of justice, he decides it is ignorance behind these principles I can call it the original position. This 'veil' allows the audience to see all the facts about themselves, and these facts may obscure the notion of justice they are about to develop. Indeed, John Bordley Rawls (1921-2002) was one of the most influential American philosophers after the Second World War. He published the first book and thought widely about his best work, The Theory of Justice, at the age of 50 in 1971, but this book was quickly regarded as one of the most important political philosophies . His philosophy, also known as Roll Saranism, received strong support or strong opposition from political philosophers, especially advocates of Utilitarianism, as the concept of Rawls challenged the principle of utilitarianism.

In John Rawls' justice theory, he defines disobedience of citizens. Change, Government. Rawls said citizen's disobedience is a refusal to comply with certain laws; this is usually due to the need to change government and state policies and laws. Civil disobedience necessitates advertising, nonviolence, and the proper attention of the law they are about to cancel. Pastor Martin Luther King and John Rawls philosopher John Rawls proposed various reasons for civil disobedience. According to natural law theory and modern consensual theory, the law may require legal citizen disobedience. According to Rawls, this article explains the reasons for disobedience. In addition, I will explain the explanation based on Martin Luther King Jr.'s legal disobedience. Finally, I will explain civic disobedience and ideas of violence. Two concepts of civil disobedience, Martin Luther King Jr. and John Rawls, Martin Luther King's review of the concept of civil disobedience (Martin Luther King Jr.) seems to be a radical extremist However, in the history he has not been portrayed on this subject. The definition of John Rawls' civil disobedience is very passive, so I doubt if he is quietly opposed to this behavior. Martin Luther King Jr. sought civil rights for blacks in the 1960s, but Rawls did not have a specific target group with his "social contract" theory. However, Rawls may be called a prolific writer; his theory of when to participate in civil disobedience is unfounded in reality. Unlike Martin Luther King, Rawls lives in an isolated academic environment. Rawls is part of a privileged majority. Rawls speaks from the perspective of most people. Martin Luther King Jr. spoke from the perspective of a black man who struggled for racial equality in the 1960 's. The cultural gap between the two is reflected in their philosophy and the view of life. Rawls is a white privileged majority member and is anxious to change minorities. Martin Luther King Jr., who is afraid of his life due to civil rights struggle, makes the issue of civil disobedience even more urgent

Among many smart philosophers, the relationship between justice and good has been discussed for thousands of years. Many theorists will explain the exact features and try to outline the moral distribution of property. From the beginning of the First World War to the present, a liberal view has emerged in various ideological theories and continues to influence political thoughts in rights, equality and freedom. With this emergence, the two very influential liberal political philosopher theorists Robert Nojic and John Rawls took a fundamentally different approach to justice and good relations. These philosophical principles include justice, the existence of right and wrong, and the relationship between people and the environment and their interactions. The most important is the choice of freedom. The leadership of Muslim scholars shows that their views differ. Everyone can infer a different ideological way. Meanwhile, a precedent led by Sahab (a companion of a prophet) indicates that they believe that Islamic law is not only a set of rules but also a value system that certain rules are overwhelming concrete signs It is. Value ... The development of the Al-Maqasid theory has made remarkable progress until the days of Al Ghazālī (d.5005H) and Al Shatibi (d.790H) Understanding part of the distribution of justice, personal relationship products and general relationship products can reasonably adapt to different accurate measurement concepts (Gheaus 2018). Indeed, friendship has become one of many resources for distribution of justice (Cordelli 2015a), and believes that it is possible to pay attention as a fundamental ability, to form and maintain meaningful relationships It is (Nussbaum 2000: 82 - 83). A good family relationship including child rearing is considered to be a major contributor to at least some people's happiness (Arneson 2014) Some arguments support the conclusion that certain personal relationship products are similar to the main products in the sense that John Rawls used this term. That is, distribution is a commodity of justice. The first reason is that several personal relationship products are multipurpose: no matter what people want, people need to pursue them a valuable concept of life (Kittay 1999; Brake 2017; Cordelli 2015 a, 2015 b). It is often necessary to pursue a life plan, and development and exercise of moral power is necessary to be included in the primary product list, which is not sufficient condition. Ultimately, oxygen, water, food can not survive, but they are not included in the main product list. (Page 138)

From the beginning of the John Rawls People's Law the Orientalism of Edward Side (1978) caused a contradiction in colonial studies. Does Sed's theory suggest that global impacts and strategies have been demonstrated by culture and imperialism (1993)? Or Orientalism belongs only to the Middle East, especially the Middle East. Is there only one "other" in the work? Alternatively, there is a resistance pocket in the discourse of the Western Empire. But perhaps the most difficult problem involves a position on imperialism and global issues of colonization. John Rawls is a remarkable example of this tradition. In the People's Law, Rawls extended his "justice" approach to global justice. His allegations justified us by showing that people representatives choose to pick it up as an imaginary place to prevent them from knowing which particular person they represent It is possible to do. This ignorant decision model is fair because it eliminates selfish prejudice. When Rawls applied this method in the context of domestic justice, the initial position of the party represented individual members of society, he considered supporting the redistributive, equitivistic liberal politics. In contrast, Rawls believes that when his approach applies to global justice, it fairly supports the traditional Kant 's international ethics: compliance with the duty of the Convention and strict restrictions on war. Take back. Rawls expressed this ideal as "realistic utopia." John Rawls introduced the concept of human rights politics in his book "People's Law" (Rolls 1999). The basic idea is to determine what the human rights are and what they need by determining the main role that human rights fulfills in a particular political field. In the People's Law, this field is international relations (followed by the politics of the country). An attempt by Rawls to rectify international law and politics in today's international system will help Rawls explain how to focus on how human rights works in this system. Human rights in interpersonal relationship does not belong to this field

Abstract: This paper explores the relationship between justice and government, expressed by the thematic views expressed by traditional political philosophers such as Rousseau and rock, and by modern political theorists such as John Rawls and Robert Nojic Consider the view. Rawls believes that justice is one of the fundamental concerns of governing bodies; Rock and Rousseau agree that the government and judicians are fundamentally related. However, Nozick and Max Weber claim that the essence of the government is power, not justice. Human rights is an idea that has arrived. The Universal Human Rights Declaration calls for people around the world to enjoy freedom and justice. Governments violating citizenship are required to accept tasks every day as they are challenged. People from all over the world are mobilized and face unreasonable and inhuman behavior everyday. Like water drops falling on rocks, they consume the power of repression and bring the world closer to the principles expressed in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The foundation of the United Nations is peace, justice, liberty and human rights. The Universal Human Rights Declaration recognizes that human rights are the foundation of freedom, justice and peace. The unanimously adopted Vienna Declaration and Action Plan stated that respect for democracy, development, human rights and fundamental freedom are interdependent and mutually reinforcing. Since then, many United Nations agencies have adopted a human rights-based approach to their development cooperation and accumulated experience in their activities. However, all agencies tend to make their own interpretation of how and how it works. Everyone is worried that access to justice is the latest way of development cooperation. It supports and supports the development of human rights: access to justice is a fundamental right and important means to protect other rights. Human rights approach provides the framework necessary for human development behavior. ¿ 1/2 For most people the ability to submit arguments and claim accountability is an important capability. This is especially important when there is uncertainty about inequality. Unbalanced power leads to unfair health or trade policies that protect the interests of a group over the interests of other groups or can lead to abuse of power (eg corruption, child trafficking, domestic violence) There is sex. This may affect people's vulnerability to poverty. This section discusses which rights belong to the list of human rights. Every problem that is not social justice or wise rule is a human rights problem. For example, there is a possibility that income inequality and the lack of higher education are too many in a country, and there is no infringement of human rights. It is a rather difficult problem to decide which norm should be regarded as human rights. And pressure continues to expand the list of human rights to new fields. Many political campaigns want to classify their main concerns as human rights issues. This will promote, promote and legalize their concerns at the international level. Possible consequences of this situation are "human rights inflation", a devaluation of human rights caused by overproduction of bad human rights currencies (see Cranston 1973, Orend 2002, Wellman 1999, Griffin 2008).

The sense of justice is already midnight. After the speech at the memorial church a few hours ago, I was standing in the "garden". It was very cold at night. I removed the button of the sweater from my back and wore it. A series of friends and friends gave me "congratulations" when I was frozen in the garden In the past, I gave an introduction speech to Johnny Cochran, the campus speaker of our black history month. . The key to rationality is to have a sense of justice. The sense of justice is usually an effective desire to obey the duties and obligations required by the judiciary; it includes the intention to cooperate with others with conditions accepted and accepted by rational individuals. Rawls believes that justice is a property that people usually have; it seems to be "a condition of human social nature" (TJ, 495/433 rev.). He rejects the idea that people will be motivated only for their own interests; he also rejects the Hobbes' assumption that the intent to do justice must be based on self-interest. Discussion about the feasibility and stability of Rawls' justice is very important. In other words, the parties participating in society have an effective sense of justice and can make justice necessary for justice as a member of society. For themselves or because they believe that this is morally demanding them. Many of King Lear's characters are victims of injustice. Abuse of power and misunderstanding sense of justice may possibly unkind humans. The character of Cornwall and Lear clearly shows this misleading sense of justice, which inevitably leads to their death. The dichotomy between justice and fraud tells the motives of some people and clarifies the mistakes of others. This shows the dramatic sarcasm of Lear King; as Cornwall was overwhelmed by his wrong powers too noisy, he realized that the reason for the fall was indeed his own arrogance did not. He said that his wounds were "out of date", but it was clearly a direct result of his unfair torture against Gloucester. Justice is a concept that includes fairness, ethical and fair treatment in everyone. In the most general sense, it means that they have value they actually deserve or, in a way, depend on individuals who can access it. In most legal systems, justice is a special basic concept. From a practical point of view, it is the name of a fair result. Justice and fairness are neither identical nor completely different. ... If they are different, fairness and fairness are not good; if both are good, they are the same. ... For fairness, it is better than some kind of justice, but it is itself. Since justness and fairness are the same, fairness is excellent but both are superior.

The theory of classical justice is definitely a complex matter worth considering. The deterministic word seems simple like "Good things should get another good thing" and "Justice brings justice to all things", but interpretation of these judges is clear There is none. Since there is no such thing as a black and white system or the world, I can not simply say that everyone will get what they deserve. In fact, life seems to be more gambling than determinism. For example, 10 people living in 10 different places may work very well. Liberalism and classical liberalism argue that distribution justice is mainly (and sometimes distinctive) historical. It is important to ask if you are asking whether the right to righteousness in the world was mainly treated fairly by people. Mainly they respect their own people and property rights. Distribution issues may be related to the assessment of social justice (see next section), but liberals often considers people's legitimate property as a property that they have acquired in a lawful (or respectful) manner ing. As a result, they reject the theory that they focus only on the distribution of the outcome and final state. Since its introduction in 1971, John Rawls's "justice" has become classical. The author has modified the original to remove some of the difficulties encountered by him and others in the original book. Rawls's purpose is to express an important part of the common core of democratic tradition - justice as fairness - to provide an alternative to utilitarianism which has dominated Anglo-Saxon's political thought tradition since the 19th century It is that. Rolls replaced the ideal of social contract with a more satisfying explanation of the basic rights of citizens as freedom and equality and freedom. "Everyone" wrote that "Even if it can not exceed the happiness of society as a whole, it has an invincible sense based on justice." That theory advancing Rawls, Lewis, Lincoln's ideas is as powerful as it was first announced. In "justice theory", Rawls first stated that "justice is the first virtue of the social system", which means that a good society is a society constructed according to the principle of justice. Rawls argues that existing theory of justice developed in the field of philosophy is not enough. His theory is aimed at formulating the concept of a social basic structure based on social justice - justice as justice.

An overview of John Rawls and social contract. John Rawls combines the earlier traditional social contract approach with more modern usage to create a chaotic social philosophical renaissance. Professor Rawls is not a reason to advocate civic authority or a form to adopt, but I am more interested in the principle of promoting a basic social system - though it assumes authority, but focuses on animation I am counting on you. In short, Rawls believes that "justice and fairness" should be the basic animation principle. The social contract theory began as a description of the origins and legitimacy of the country, especially in the works of Hobbes and Rock, but later thinkers like Rousseau, Emmanuel Kant and John Rawls also applied social contract theory. On the international stage (partly explains Grotius's international justice in the "Law of War and Peace"). In these applications, the state replaces citizens as parties to social contracts. The judicial part of social contract theory is based on the international treaties such as "Geneva Convention on Prisoner Handling" (if the country agrees with humanitarian treatment of prisoners) or the right to UN human rights declaration (States promise to realize various human rights) Can be used to review the provisions of the Convention In 1971, John Rawls promoted social contracts to regain attention by announcing the "justice theory". Later, he extended the model of "justice theory" to the international stage of the People's Law. Rawls uses a social contract model. And that calls him "justice and fairness" in the context of the country and "people's rule" at the international stage. Rawls' statement is purely normative and does not pretend to be an accurate descriptive statement about how each country interacts indeed. He explained his argument as the "ideal theory" of pursuing "realistic utopia." John Rawls' view of civil disobedience is different from Martin Luther King. He believes democracy is a social contract. He does not believe that people are "groups" with individual identities. In fact, Rawls argues that in democratic society, people who originally signed a social contract did not know their social, economic, or ethnic differences. He called it "pure veil" (Rolls). The primitive principle of these hypotheses agrees with the form of governance that treats everyone equally according to law. Since this contract includes democracy, a constitution is necessary. This includes the legislators who are responsible for making the law. Sometimes the law is unfair. However, as part of social contracts, citizens also signed the profit that democracy provides to them. As a result, citizens must comply with unfair laws

Accept punishment to justify crime or to punish human crime. Fairly distribute profits and burdens based on the specific concept of the incident In the twelfth year, "right to defend rights through distribution of compensation and punishment", "righteousness, legal rights, jurisdiction" (11c) from former French justice, "justice, fairness" from Latin eustia, From Eustace's "honesty". "Fair and just quality" (see Justice (adj.)) The old French words have broad meanings including "righteousness, equality, advocacy of rights, courts, judges". This term came to be used as the title of a judicial officer in English c.1200. That means "correct order, fairness" is the end of 14c. Peace and justice first proved the beginning of 14c. In Mercian 's hymn, Latin eustia is covered with old English rehtwisnisse. Offering justice (to someone or something) to "show complete and fair proper appreciation" began in the 1670s New Culture Literacy Dictionary, 3rd Edition Copyright © 2005 Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company. Houghton Published by Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company. Copyright Types of justice: justice as revenge (retaliation justice), righteousness as compassion, justice as harmony (equality and justice), justice as justice (must be treated equal to equality), equal interests and burden Distribution of Justice and Justice Redistribution of Justice, Justice as Love, Justice as Reconciliation and Compensation (Restorative Justice) - Caucasian social science is not a stable black family but an unstable black family There is a tendency to strengthen the public's negative perception of AA by focusing -> focusing on psychopathological problems encountered by Mexican Americans by the same Latin Americans, they are indigenous American Things like -> These problems are thought to be due to internal factors rather than social failure Social justice is a solution of social justice for all materials linked to a common theme that is replacing our company, but what is the real meaning behind these words? What is the real definition of social justice? Wikipedia recognizes the collective nature of humanity, thinking "social justice" as the origin of religious terms, and commitment to support others' individuals, here are some common Definition: "Exercise of justice in society ...... In particular, social exercises from various social strata of society, the social justice society is based on the principle of equality and solidarity, like its supporters and practitioners I believe that this education understands both social justice society And not only emphasis on human rights but also recognize the dignity of each person "- Wikipedia Justice as justice refers to the concept of justice advocated by John Rawls in the "justice theory". This concept of justice includes the fundamental structure of society, "the main political, constitutional, social and economic systems of society, and how they are integrated to form a social cooperation program ? "Is included. The framework clearly states that "justice and fairness is not a complete connection theory". 2 The objective is to show how to allocate the remaining cooperation resources to individuals in society. Therefore justice as justice depends on two implicit assumptions about the society in question. One is social cooperation is possible, and it is to meet everyone's common interests.

The role of justice in society by John Rawls 's equality inference and J. J. C.' s action - Utilitarian view Smart, I analyze the concept of justice. According to Rolls, I will believe that social change that increases the burden of 5% of the poor, even if these changes increase the average happiness of the other 95%, is unfair. Morally, justice is defined as justice and all situations should be treated equally. To show justice, it must be fair and reasonable in all circumstances. The concept of justice and justice in 1984 was an important theme of George Orwell in 1984. Justice is defined as "profit of strong" by Plato. Justice played an important role in society in 1984. Unlike justice, the hero of the text is not a society where they live. In Orwell 's novel "1984", an extremely controlled totalitarian government was called a party and dominated society. They introduced a telescreen monitor to maintain the continuation of fear and hatred for 'enemies'. Does Winston's reaction to the person lying on the sidewalk coincide with your current understanding of his role? The answer may change. 7. How is the lottery of 1984 similar to the lottery of today? Millions of people took part, but few winners. It brings false hopes to many people. In our society, some people make a living by "predicting" the number of people. 8. What kind of item did Winston discover? Food as social welfare is the basic substance that human beings desire and want to live together in society. Therefore, it is the subject of social justice. The government is involved in food distribution based on many concepts of justice (eg free market, religious tradition, utility principle, difference principle etc.). In this model, food is what people can use, distribute and exchange in a way consistent with the meaning that society gives it. Food distribution includes the basic system of society and the principle of justice regulating the way to distribute this social welfare And that is just a society. Therefore, the juvenile justice system is responsible for establishing institutions and laws to protect the important role played by young people in society. Since young people have special needs for age, physical, emotional and social development, this system should also be promoted by welfare and judicial problems. It is essential that the system deal effectively with these welfare and justice problems and grow young people.

Democratic Justice Why was Socrates executed by a famous philosopher based on his political and spiritual beliefs or because he taught his faith to students? I personally believe that pursuing truth and seeking wisdom. He asked the youngster to oppose the god of Athens, and expert opinion was the only related opinion. Socrates did not express his concerns nor choose to leave the society that supported his life for seventy years. His work on justice, ethics, democracy and the market has been translated into 27 languages. His legendary course "Justice" is the first Harvard course that is offered on free online and television. Tens of millions of people including China saw Sundel as "the most influential alien of the year". (China News Weekly) Sundel's lecture was the subject of the TV series of PBS, BBC, NHK. (Japan) and NDTV (India). He has appeared in Colbert 's report, today' s show, Chen Qiao and Charlie Rose and currently hosts the popular BBC series 'Public Philosopher' exploring philosophical problems behind the headline. In his journal of social justice journal published in his millennium classic "Relationship between globalization and militarism". 27, No 4 (2000), Steven Staples believes globalization, social justice and the decline of democracy are caused by globalization. He further predicted that the "most serious impact" of globalization will lead to differences in the degree of war and chaos in the Third World. Scrambling natural resources can also cause globalization. The so-called external forces of so-called collective struggles for so-called rich natural resources are also several reasons for the most deadly war we recorded. • Democracy - Relationship of Social Justice Europe 's experience in linking democracy to the evolution of social justice is obtained through efforts towards new challenges that cross - border relations with Europe and globalization brings to this relationship It is related to experience. Economic liberalization must be shaped to promote economic, ecological and social sustainable development and prosperity to strengthen and integrate young democracy and more democratize the authoritarian regime It will not. Comparing justice and democracy, the former proved more useful in promoting social equality. At the same time, it does not exclude justice, but it is supported by democracy. In fact, justice can use democracy as a means of achieving greater social equality while preventing unreasonable outcomes. American philosopher John Rawls proposed the two principles of justice: principle 1 is freedom and equality, principle II is a combination of equal opportunity and discriminatory treatment. The aim of principle 2 is to achieve justice based on fair value that can not be achieved by democracy alone 51. Therefore, in addition to guaranteeing the action taken by the major countries through democratic procedures, the results must be guaranteed. Their behavior is based only on the principle of justice

In this paper, we propose a strategy for constructing modern Hume 's distribution theory theory. It will lay the foundation for my so-called entrepreneurial welfare state. Supporting his model of the distribution of justice resources by combining insight into the origin and purpose of justice of David Hume and insurance based on Ronald Dokin's insurance will create a country as a matter of justice , Has been claimed. Encourage members to participate in entrepreneurial spirit. Activities to protect them from the worst effects of market economy. Justice research is usually defined by the theory of John Rawls. Justice theory focuses on the principle of logistics in society. The decisive argument of the environmental justice movement is a model to violate some of the principles of distribution of justice theory. Some modern scholars have developed a wider justice theory than the theory of justice distribution. Research on justice theories applied to environmental justice mainly focuses on "bias of distribution". In other words, research in this field is that poor communities, communities of indigenous peoples, and colorful communities are affected by negative external factors related to the environment regardless of environmental protection It is focused on the fact that there are many. In this paper, we propose a strategy for constructing modern Hume 's distribution theory theory. It will lay the foundation for my so-called entrepreneurial welfare state. - Small and medium enterprises are considered to be the main pillars of the world. For example, in many European countries, SMEs are considered to play an important role in the success and prosperity of the whole country. Most people want to achieve ownership, independent interests and personal success, starting with small business. If the plan is right, SMEs can prove very successful. Nozick classifies distribution theory theory into two categories. The first classification is whether the theory is historical or historical, and the difference is whether or not the theory considers past action / event / situation (history) (non-historical). A more important difference between Nozick's different distributive justice theory lies in the theory of patterns and the theory without patterns. Patterned justice theory refers to the theory that distribution rates are determined or associated with variables. For example, Utilitarian theory of justice will assign social goods according to their practical level of promotion, so it will be a pattern of justice theory. Patternless theory does not refer to world variables to determine who gets what. Nozick's claim to justice theory of justice is to use the example of Wilt Chamberlain to argue that they are incompatible with freedom and to discuss this.

David Hume is considered a reputable and influential philosopher, and its method of experience provides a basis for many ethical principles. Although the expressive nature of Hume and the complexity of intellectual thinking are incredible to most readers, the importance of justice is considered important and even today's society has many values ​​and ethics . It is related. The discussion of Hume's moral virtue in his book "Exploring the Moral Principle" explains the importance of justice that is related to further examples of moral evidence and moral differences . (I) The precondition for the distribution of justice is a condition that must be met in consideration of the distribution of justice. David Hume's "situation of justice" is an example. Most modern theorists agree with Hume's view that the problem of distribution justice arises only when the substance is relatively short of (to the resources that people need). It is not wealthy, extremely poor). Under such circumstances, there are contradictions of identity and contradictions between individuals, so we need to seek necessary and potentially fair resolutions of the principles necessary for assertion of contradiction. As suggested above, the interpretation as a competing argument that balances with distributable justice-assignable ones reflects the approval of the idea that distributed justice emerges only when justice is obtained ing. I have direct responsibility for this. In his judicial affairs, David Hume places great emphasis on the distribution of social property. Hume believes that only the concept of property can give social justice and other social virtues. According to Hume, justice is an important social virtue whose sole purpose is public works. In order to show his view on how property distribution defines social justice, David Hume cited several examples. Utopia Society as an example David Hume (1711-1776) is a Scottish philosopher and economist. He tried to apply scientific methods, especially from a knowledge perspective, to the exploration of the essence of human beings. Rawls said Hume called justice as "cautious and unwieldy virtue". He refers to Hume's book "Theory of Humanity" (1739) and "Exploring the Moral Principle" (1751). Rolls discussed his own view on the situation of justice based on Hume. He further stated that Hume could determine the terms of the justice society when discussing the concept of reasonable and fair sympathy for the audience.

For many people, justice means fairness. Justice is important to most people, but it means different for different groups. For example, social justice is a concept that everyone should have equal economic, political and social opportunities regardless of race, sex, religion. Distribution Justice means fair distribution of social assets. Environmental justice is fair treatment for all people from the viewpoint of environmental burden and benefits. Restorative or corrective justice is designed to make people unfairly treated more complete. Retaliatory justice is aimed at punishing criminals objectively and proportionally. Procedural justice is to carry out a legal decision in accordance with fair and equitable procedures. Justice is one of the most important moral values ​​in legal and political fields. It is prudent to maintain a system of law and politics law and order, but they can not be achieved unless they can achieve justice Types of justice: justice as revenge (retaliation justice), justice as compassion, justice as harmony (equality and justice), justice as justice (must be treated equally as equality) redistribution of justice, as love Justice, justice as reconciliation and compensation (restorative justice) - Caucasian social science has a tendency to strengthen the public's negative perception of AA against AA by focusing on unstable black families rather than many stable black families There is -> the same Latin Americans are focusing on psychopathological problems encountered by Mexican Americans, they are like indigenous Americans -> these problems rather than social failure It is considered to be caused by an internal factor Social justice is our name, a common theme linking solutions for all social justice solutions, but what is the real meaning behind these words? What is the real definition of social justice? Wikipedia believes that "social justice" comes from religious terms that recognize the collective nature of human beings and our personal approach to helping others, but here are some common definitions there is. Socially fair society is defined as a principle based on equality and solidarity by its supporters and practitioners, and this pedagogy also thinks socially just society understands and Emphasize human rights, recognize everyone's dignity. - Wikipedia Justice as justice refers to the concept of justice advocated by John Rawls in the "justice theory". This concept of justice includes the fundamental structure of society, "the main political, constitutional, social and economic systems of society, and how they are integrated to form a social cooperation program ? "Is included. The framework clearly states that "justice and fairness is not a complete connection theory". 2 The objective is to show how to allocate the remaining cooperation resources to individuals in society. Therefore justice as justice depends on two implicit assumptions about the society in question. One is social cooperation is possible, and it is to meet everyone's common interests.

People respect the law by complying with the law, including fair treatment of the law in return. As an example of comparing honor and fairness or other aspects, justice is the arrest of a murderer's police, justice has been established, or otherwise incorporated into their misconduct, the threat is excluded from society ing. While fair and impartial, it goes through with danger, brings glory to the police, and carries out its duties. The quality of 'justice' is equal to the behavior corresponding to moral rights and fairness, suggesting that justice is determined by conscience and rationality. Justice means that everyone is different. There are many ways to define, but there are more ways to explain the definition. The textbook of justice is defined as "the principle of fairness; the ideal of moral equality" (criminal law). Many people believe that there is no justice or that judicial standards apply to everyone. Since the appearance of the rule, justice was a concept. Eye eye is exactly right. Today the judicial system is much more complicated and fair but the same principles apply. Justice develops around the principle that all actions bring results. The criminal justice system is designed to provide sufficient and just punishment for those who committed illegal acts. This is not always the case. In ancient Egypt, the first written code, Hammurabi code, was designed to serve justice. According to today's standards, this is not justice at all. Since there are many rational explanations about "freedom", "equality", "fairness", there will be many political concepts of just liberal justice. However, as the whole family explains the same basic idea, the political concept of all liberal justice has certain basic features. Mr. Rawls said these abstract features had to be realized with some kind of institution. He mentioned the features that all societies ordered by liberal political thought will share: fair opportunities for all citizens (especially in education and training); distribution of income and wealth; last Government as an employer of basic; basic health services and elected election funds

Social justice is a fair service of society as a whole or society as a whole. Various unique ideas about building a fair society are established in history. Two well-known concepts are the concept of Locke and Marx. Both have ideas about 'state of justice', but they are very different in every respect. When viewing John Rock 's view on social justice and just state as thought that everyone is dominated by what he calls "natural law" and is protected by their "unfair personal rights" It begins. Our impossible right is life, freedom, health and wealth. In the 1970s, John Rawls assumed that there was no comment on human equality and made freedom the "social value" of the second from the end ("lexical priority"). Even the great materialist Karl Marx partly agreed with the structure of Justice of Rock; he accused the individualist "bourgeois" ethics - "exploitation" means moral equality. The starting point of the rock in deciding justice is that the fraud is "limited by the arbitrary will of others." Therefore, being bound by other people's "arbitrary will" is in a state of justice. As this situation is free, Locke considers justice to be free. The most influential and well-known contemporary political thinker, Karl Marx and John Rock, are interdisciplinary, personal, and their numerous insights and persuasive arguments expressing them We presented. Recognition of various conditions of behavior. Marx is a German political thinker known for his idea about the difference between communism and social class. Rock is a British philosopher known for his social contract and is known as the liberal father (CITE). in spite of Both Karl Marx and John Locke analyzed personality with different concepts. Marx's ideas include the existence of species, alienation and private property. However, the idea of ​​rock is related to humanity, state of war, wealth. Marx and rock regard people as individuals. Neither theory classifies women. Karl Marx presented his individualist opinion in "Alienated Labor Party" and "Communist Party Declaration". John Locke talked about his view on "Second Government Theory." When dealing with the existence of species, Marx "as seed", you mimic this idea, you become seed. For Marx, people are "universal" and "free", created and evaluated by aesthetics. (Marx 442). However, we must first prepare the inorganic properties we can produce. "... In comparison with animals, more common people, the inorganic nature of his life is more common ... people living in nature mean that nature is his body." Marx 443)

What is justice? For great philosophers of ancient Greece, and even today's great philosopher, justice is a controversial issue, widely discussed and reconsidered. Although the nature of justice and injustice has been stated and reviewed many times, the origin of review was by Trashimacos in Greece, later the paper was reviewed and revised by Glaucon. Thomas Hobbs once again corrected the position of Groucon and his version is now recognized as an interpretation of the origin of justice and injustice. Some people think that the Western "systematic" or "programmed" political and moral philosophy has started in the Plato Republic, but the problem is "What is Justice". Because truth is an ideology, justice is the first morality of the social system. From "Plato to the classic way of Rawls," justice "is always interpreted as logic or" subject "of the concept of injustice. These methods quote a variety of unfair examples which the problem of justice theory must overcome. However, some ways after World War II have clearly challenged duality between the two concepts. Justice can be regarded as different from kindness, charity, attention, compassion, generosity, compassion. If I gain justice from God, can I condemn God as unjust? What kind of justice can I blame justice for wrongs? The opponent himself can have the ultimate existence only to explain his consistency with justice. 2 There is no justice. There is justice. It belongs to the person who understands the heart. A man who sang in the morning. A man sitting in heaven laughed. Do you see the other party? Behold, I will not blame! Even if all the curses are taken from him, even if he does not have an appointment, even if he and all his friends betray him the same can be said. Nothing is offered - he did not turn over, he did not break. He faithful to honor, faithful to virtue, and humbly accept his suffering

- John Rawls, Theory of Justice. The main responsibility of the justice system is to secure justice and to prevent criminals from harming civilians and not to help them find a job and lead a good life. When a person commits a crime, they must give fair judgment and punishment for their actions. Punishment is a tool for teaching criminals Just because things work will not say we should not recover at all, but the main problem the judicial system should focus on is reprisal and punishment. Of course, the best thing is always a balance, that is, a system with two aspects, but what if you choose only one? First of all, imagine a society that is completely based on a rehabilitation system. Some people commit crimes without going to prison, go to the rehabilitation center, learn trading, get salary from school, find work assistance. What will eventually happen is that many people see the criminals rewarded, and they think that it may be worth it to hurt a small crime. Of course, your recidivism rate may be very low, but you have to face a number of new criminals who understand that risk profits outweigh the risks. If our judicial system only focuses on retaliation, you will have a more just society. Punishment can prevent people from committing or committing. You may not be able to release many happy prisoners and continue to bring great benefits to society, but this is not the purpose of the justice system. After reading the positive comments on this discussion, I noticed that many people think that punishment is somewhat "unfair". The obvious fact is opposite. When someone did bad things, they are punished for fairness and justness. This achieves the goal of satisfying justice and ensuring honest and legitimate civic safety and well-being. By emphasizing rehabilitation rather than retaliation, the criminal justice system not only abandons criminals. Rehabilitation can identify factors that cause them to cause bias. Rehabilitation believes that the possibility of repeating a crime is kept to a minimum. It is through rehabilitation that it is possible to reintegrate criminals into society, as it has been proven that society has not lost hope for criminals. It places great emphasis on the rights of prisoners, changes criminals, and prevents him from committing crime again. Restore them and free them. However, many criminals can not recover. Some criminals have received the highest punishment. That is retributive justice. Retaliation Justice is the theory of justice, if punishment is proportional, it is a morally acceptable response to sin. Give them justice if necessary. Please do not give the murderer a chance to kill a second time. It can only be restored if possible. Justice, as quoted in a corridor of justice, should not only be done, but should be done. The judicial system must ensure that criminals are dealt with in accordance with crimes. We can respond to misdemeanor through rehabilitation, make the criminal better and return it to the community

Justice is often considered to be ambiguous. Therefore, it is usually seen from a philosophical point of view. In fact, justice has been tested by famous philosophers such as John Rawls and Friedrich Hayek. Often called "soft science", the concept of justice itself is the subject of the theoretical framework, not the scientific concept. Despite this theoretical perspective, many theories surrounding justice are trying to identify the cause of a particular behavior. These theories discuss which strokes are used to correct these behaviors. What is neural plasticity? The definition I got from medicinenet.com - Neuroplasticity, also known as brain plasticity, is the ability of the brain to reconstitute itself by forming new neural connections throughout life. Neuronal plasticity allows neurons (neurons) in the brain to compensate for injuries and diseases and adjust their activities to new conditions or environmental changes. What is the relationship between neuroplasticity and sex? Sex and sensation are compatible. If they have sex, do they want one thing? Look at all the sounds, listen to all cockroaches and cockroaches, sniff, and know the taste. Sexy feelings are given to you, but if I tell you, can it be promoted stronger and stronger? Recent brain science studies show that the basic process of all learning is neural plasticity. Neural plasticity is the ability of the brain to reconnect itself by forming new neural connections. It forms the basis of all learning and runs through life. If you want to change our mindset, it is a really important process and you need to nurture it. Mindfulness is a conscious consciousness created by focusing on current noncritical experience. Through a series of intensive research exercises and practice, you can nurture the brain, consciously adjust your attention, feelings, thoughts, beliefs, and respond instead of reacting. Thoughtful thinking and brains of social emotions Innovation is achieved by core facts, ie neural plasticity, where the human brain is constantly changing through experience. Neuroplasticity, also known as brain plasticity, refers to the ability of the brain itself to recombine by creating new neurons and forming new relationships between neurons and other factors. People believe that the brain will be "fixed" for a long time. I will never stop the brain from changing. Because people are interested in using nerve plasticity to live better lives, strengthen the brain, and delay the decline of the brain.

In ancient Greece, city states and people called out to society through democracy. Democracy in Athens aims to bring benefits to people through justice. Unfortunately, this does not always happen. In Hercula, practice of democracy contradicts its basic principle. The degree of justice a person can obtain depends largely on their position in Greek society. In many cases the population voting of the people will benefit a few people who are most affected and the policies they adopt will not support fair morality. Comparing justice and democracy, the former proved more useful in promoting social equality. At the same time, it does not exclude justice, but it is supported by democracy. In fact, justice can use democracy as a means of achieving greater social equality while preventing unreasonable outcomes. American philosopher John Rawls proposed the two principles of justice: principle 1 is freedom and equality, principle II is a combination of equal opportunity and discriminatory treatment. The aim of principle 2 is to achieve justice based on fair value that can not be achieved by democracy alone 51. Therefore, in addition to guaranteeing the action taken by the major countries through democratic procedures, the results must be guaranteed. Their behavior is based only on the principle of justice Returning to the foundation of equal opportunities, Lewis Brandis Justice states as follows. "Democracy depends on two pillars: First, everyone will enjoy the principles of pursuit of life, freedom, happiness Promote the development of civilization" Three years ago, Alan Kluger was in the White House He resigned as Chairman of the Economic Advisory Council and was concerned that income inequality leads to unhealthy opportunities. The same goes for the need for equality of data and the resolution of data equality. This is unknown at this moment, but in all areas of life and work, income, difference between women's wages and equal opportunities are important.

Using Rawls' s approach to social justice, he criticized the practice of international adoption of children. From this point of view, international adoption is considered contradictory to the principle of social justice, and the social background in which it occurs is ignored. In many cases, the social background surrounding international adoption has the right to know discrimination and birth against girls who are deprived of citizenship due to serious poverty and poor adoption, low social status, girls Children. Risks identified by children together with history and parentage relationships, children ethnicity, culture, groups of countries may involve children's abduction, fraud and trafficking acts and practices. This article presents other perspectives including liberalism and utilitarianism. Criticized the solution of the two international treaties and discussed the impact of social work policy support, practice and research INTRODUCTION International adoption in the United States has steadily increased. Many people who want to start their families in the United States are turning to international adoption because they are easier to adopt than this country. However, many of these adopted parents are not yet ready to accept the challenges of children in other countries. - The birth of a girl was not a festival in China For centuries it has become commonplace that farmers have buried girls who were just born in buckets. But now, as a direct result of the one-child policy, the number of aborted or abandoned girls abandoned in an orphanage is unprecedented. Adopting international adoption is the process by which people take on the role of parents of legally non-living children. As international recruitment has become one, this practice seems to be a consideration for family planning, especially in communities of social conscience. Today, it is a de facto solution for people who are interested in starting a family but are concerned about overpopulation. Using social media and mainstream media, you can clearly tell the world about the truth about population overcrisis and the steps to be taken to properly solve these crises. This will be done by collaborating with excellent video artists and other creative thinking, which is focused on overcrowded population, promised to solve it by posting moving and convincing information can do. Of course, there should be plenty of money to support it.

The place where the red fern grows Wilson Wilson's novel "Red Fern growing place" is a boy's story, his two hound dogs (he is the name Laodan and Xiao), and their shared adventure stories. They are loving trioes that separate the dark hills and riverbeds of Cherokee country. Lao Dan has muscle, Shaoan has a brain, Billy has the intention to train them to become the best hunting team in the valley. Glory and victory are waiting for them, but sadness is waiting. "My dog's reputation spreads throughout our Ozark, they are the best in that country" (Rolls 131). This is a reference in the book "Red Fern" by Wilson Rawls. The place where a red fern grows is a book about a boy, Billy and his two raccoon hunting dogs. Three of them have many adventures, and many of them introduce an inevitable theme of change. First, when Billy discusses with the children in the town, part of the book is a good example of the inevitable change in the theme. I do not remember reading a place where red ferns grew for the first time where red ferns grew, as I described by Wilson Rawls. I saw it about 10 years old, but I do not remember how many times I read it. This is a time in my life, but puberty has not yet begun This is an era when animals are my greatest love. The place where a red fern grows is a novel about a little boy and two dogs, but especially for animal lovers. The story is told in the first person stories, adults remember his childhood; the reader experiences life through the eyes of an eleven year old boy living in the Ozark Mountains of Arkansas. The place where the red fern grows Wilson Wilson's novel "Red Fern growing place" is a boy's story, his two hound dogs (he is the name Laodan and Xiao), and their shared adventure stories. They are loving trioes that separate the dark hills and riverbeds of Cherokee country. Lao Dan has muscle, Shaoan has a brain, Billy has the intention to train them to become the best hunting team in the valley. Glory and victory are waiting for them, but sorrow is waiting ... - Ignorance breathes life when you see a small amount of evil but is ignored. Evil is grown up and strengthened, gradually taking over the potential profitable possibilities. But when evil is everywhere and it is difficult to gain good, the same evil is now normal. During wartime, the good man became a murderer, the bad guy became a habit. The nuances between good and evil are blurred to meaningless smear in the eyes of reality.

Platonic Justice in Plato Republic, Plato and his colleagues discussed the theme of Platonic justice and the good intentions to the self. In the early days of the Republic, Plato raised that it is a fundamental question of justice. To determine the ideal state of justice, Plato believes that he must theoretically define justice theoretically to actually use justice. Platonic righteousness is defined as harmony between the three souls. There rationality leads to spirit and appetite. In fact, Aristotle and Plato's justice complement each other, but they differ from each other in fundamental terms. For example, Aristotle's justice emphasizes the rights system, while Platonic justice gives more attention to responsibility. Aristotle's justice is based on the principle that "everyone should have their own." On the contrary Plato's justice is based on the principle that "everyone should be themselves". Therefore, the former is the system of rights and the latter is the system of duty. Aristotle's justice also established equality among different members of the country, while Platonic Justice established a class hierarchy. According to this justice, citizens are divided into three categories, each carrying out a specific function. Every citizen has an obligation to carry out what he calls the state institution. Plato will not attempt such a classification Through the Republic of Prados, Plato and his colleagues discussed Plato's theme of justice and good intentions towards self. In the early days of the Republic, did Plato raise any fundamental problems of justice? To determine the ideal state of justice, Plato believes that he must theoretically define justice theoretically to actually use justice. Platonic righteousness is defined as harmony between the three souls. There rationality leads to spirit and appetite. The justice itself is very good and the real purpose is said to be very good. It educates desires and realizes the rational ability of people. Justice is not the profit of a strong person but the benefit of a weak person. The unfair life dominated by the spirit leads to a person being addicted to physical property or property. Platonic life leads to harmony, balance and virtue. In this case, justice is satisfied and unfair life is not satisfied.

The principle of the Juvenile Court is that because of its innocence and dependence, the court should give the child special treatment (Caldwell, 1961). This arises from not providing a strict common law in the UK and fair judgment for worthy children. The juvenile can receive special protection against his brother by observing minors through the Juvenile Court. This is called parens patriae. Children also show innocence and therefore are considered to be unable to commit a criminal intent at age 7 and can not commit crimes by the age of 14. Juvenile Justice: History and Philosophy, Juvenile Justice: Regional Therapy, Juvenile Judiciary: Facilities, Juvenile Justice: Juvenile Trial, Adult Crime, Juvenile Crime, Juvenile Crime, Police In the case of a potential criminal, each style of school and crime Encyclopedia.com can not guarantee all references it generates because there are subtle differences in the evolving proprietary format and not all information about all reference entries or articles is available. Therefore, we recommend that you use Encyclopedia.com citation as a starting point before checking the styles based on school and publication requirements and the latest information provided on these sites. A detailed explanation of the juvenile justice process is outside the scope of this report. The Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Bureau briefly outlines the structure and process of the juvenile justice system and the process. Professor Michele Deitch has a more comprehensive overview of the history, standards, legislation, and contemporary issues of the juvenile justice system in China. National Correction Research Institute, "Quality Practice Desktop Guide for Cooperation with Young People in Prison" (2014). A Through the Public Law 93-415 of the Juvenile Justice and Crime Prevention Act (JJDP) in 1974, the President and the Congress established the Juvenile Justice and Crime Prevention Bureau (OJJDP). OJJDP is in the Department of Judicial Procedure of the US Department of Justice, its aim is to demonstrate national leadership in coping with juvenile delinquency and improving juvenile justice. The Research Program Development Department develops knowledge about domestic trends in juvenile delinquency, supports data collection and information sharing programs including elements of statistics and system development, and provides vests for crime development and prevention, intervention and treatment best Identify practices. Practice and trend of the juvenile justice system

The special evil that the universe justice 's space turtle felt was from Dr. Quincey P. Mandra who decided that his time had elapsed after suffering in some way (at least in his case). Let's become a crazy scientist by taking over the world and using it as a toy to create revenge as a human being and revenge for creation. (You can see that Dr. Mandela's vision is very narrow, at least as our specific galaxy, as highly self-respected mad scientists had planned to occupy the universe recently. Let us assume that we promise not to have cosmic justice, but it turns out that such a state can be obtained in principle. If so, there are few benefits here. Firstly, we will live our life, and there is no hope that the faith of the universe will be possible, so without such help this hope brings hope to those who suffer from terrible tragedies I guess. In addition, for those who have sent their lives and experienced a terrible scourge, there is no ultimate reparation or redemption, the actions of most evil people are not punished and the terrible we have I believe there is no objective meaning to sin. This conviction will weaken the strength of our pursuit of justice in the world, so the adverse effect in this case will be greater. One response to the problem of evil is to look for explanations that will not spoil our beliefs about the justice of the universe. After all, maybe justice - maybe we lost us because we are not worth the victory. Some Jewish traditions teach that a temple was destroyed by our sins, but today I heard that we say that there is a government suitable for them. I will not tell you not to mourn. Sorrow is sound, appropriate and inevitable. At the same time, we can not succumb to despair. Despair is one of the sorrow stages, and we all overcome difficulties in our own time. But we have to let it through and then leave the other side. I can not give up. My belief comes from an early period. I believe in God, justice, not just "the justice of the universe" but I am a very personal justice, the need to act fairly in my personal transactions, and the mistakes I saw I believe in the need for correction. Some aspects of political campaign spending justice. For me, the degenerate nature of mankind means that all these efforts supersede one injustice and another injustice. I am very happy to leave the justice of the universe to God.

Utopian fantasy based on the Leninist concept of "Equality of results". It says you have to get rid of it from you to fewer things, so that you have more stuff so that you can be equal. So, with thieves, they have much in common, they use guns to steal your wallet to balance your wealth. This seems not applicable to rulers, but they seem to be free from social justice policy at all times. In order for social justice to exist, there must be a ruling class to achieve social justice. If there is an elite ruling class, there is no social justice. Therefore, the concept of social justice always collapses on its own Social justice is supported by people of all ages of fashion who can not afford every week for food and car gasoline, but they are also plagued by hundreds to thousands of dollars with tattoos and piercings. This is often used by tyrants who waste power to deceive the voters from abandoning their rights and freedom in exchange for free goods, linking the ruling class pocket with the theft of people. They promised to achieve social justice in Venezuela. I can not even offer toilet paper. At the same time, Maduro's right arm AristóbuloIstúriz has more than $ 9.6 million in Swiss bank account. At least Chavez's daughter can still live in the presidential office La Casona In Ukraine, the average wage is less than 300 pounds per month, and president Viktor Yanukovych stated that 2013 will be the year of social justice. In 2014 Ukrainians discovered that it is half of the possession of five-story mansion, golf course, private zoo, park, greenhouse, luxury sports car filled garage, helicopter mat, and Monaco did. Private restaurant, pirate ship such as hovercraft In the United States, they are committed to providing free medical care to everyone. Now it costs more expenses and I have less coverage. I heard that the latest dress from First Ladies is sold for $ 12,000. This is your social justice Social justice is our name, a common theme linking solutions for all social justice solutions, but what is the real meaning behind these words? What is the real definition of social justice? Wikipedia believes that "social justice" comes from religious terms that recognize the collective nature of human beings and our personal approach to helping others, but here are some common definitions there is. Socially fair society is defined as a principle based on equality and solidarity by its supporters and practitioners, and this pedagogy also thinks socially just society understands and Emphasize human rights, recognize everyone's dignity. - Wikipedia Many people will understand the term I'm using - the Millennium social justice defender - as a synonym for the contempt 'social justice fighter'. This is a term that brings weakness by abuse, but it shows an important problem. In a typical demonstration of a dazzling horseshoe shape theory, the special brand of social justice supporters of this millennium distorted the splendid cause of social, economic and political equality to social authoritarian movements. Isolated ideology separates individuals and makes them inhuman. Academic Theory Contemporary social justice movements were published on Twitter, Tumblr, Facebook, Jezebel, Slate, Huffington Post etc It is reminiscent of red panic over civil rights movement (choose one)

What is his normative and mandatory concept by replacing "state of nature" with Hobbes' Leviathan theory? Discuss three artists in different fields on the relationship between normative and mandatory things to change or update these concepts. British philosopher Thomas Hobbes of the 17th century is now widely recognized as one of the few truly great political philosophers. It is very important in work. This article outlines philosophical literature and explains various common understanding points between traditional concepts of common interest such as Plato, Aristotle, John Locke, J. J. Rousseau, Adam Smith, G. Hegel, John Rawls, Michael Walzer. It also includes some important differences, especially the difference between "common" and "distributed" views. Finally, we will consider three important themes in literature: democracy, community sharing, and a competitive market. In order to understand these problems, we must first distinguish between common interests that play outstanding roles in welfare economics, various product concepts, and inevitable discussions of welfare political ethics. In the west, there are many books and articles on universal human rights. Kant, Hobbes, Rousseau, Rock, Rawls and many other philosophers are often quoted in discussions. However, few Western philosophers try to explore Chinese philosophy and analyze human rights. Many western scholars simply deny the seeds of human rights and democracy in the Chinese tradition. In short, many Western scholars believe that the concept of human rights is not the East but the fundamentals of the West. During the drafting of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights from 1946 to 1948, it was noted that human rights are identical to western values. At that time, the executive committee of the American Anthropological Association warned that the 'declaration' was 'right to assert rights based only on values ​​spreading in Western Europe and the United States.' (Quoted from Nickel, 1987, page 68)

Whether absolute justice exists. This article presents a discussion about the existence of absolute justice. Many people do not agree with the existence of absolute justice. Therefore, because they have contradictions and different forms of justice, we believe that justice can not be derived from nature and can not get bigger and more perfect from smaller and more incomplete ones. This is why the concept of culture and the concept of time justice differ greatly from culture to culture. The vision of perfect justice comes from Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau, Kant's tradition of enlightenment. They insist on insight into completeness, ideal or absolute justice, based on the theory of social contract. Through contractual means they introduce perfect justice, leave it natural, govern the country according to the law, favor mutual benefits and both sides, and build an ideal society. For Hobbes, Justice is in the hands of the monarch, while Rock Justice exists in the form of individual rights on life, freedom and property. For Rousseau, the individual's general will or social moral collective will in society will form institutional rules that can bring about justice. However, Hume refused to recognize social contract theory because it had no historical evidence of any original contract or other contract. His explanation of justice is based on customs and customs. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Shailesh_Trivedi2/publication/323239845_International_Conference_On_Role_of_Arts_Culture_Humanities_Religion_Education_Ethics_Philosophy_Spirituality_and_Science_for_Holistic_Societal_Development/links/5a87f22ca6fdcc6b1a3b5f07/International-Conference-On-Role-of-Arts-Culture-Humanities-Religion-Education-Ethics-Philosophy-Spirituality-and- Science, society, development.pdf for the whole Does absolute justice exist? This article presents a discussion about the existence of absolute justice. Many people do not agree with the existence of absolute justice. Therefore, because they have contradictions and different forms of justice, we believe that justice can not be derived from nature and can not get bigger and more perfect from smaller and more incomplete ones. This is why the concept of culture and the concept of time justice are very different. This is another case for absolute justice. Their argument allows absolute justice from nature. There is no problem, of course there is a justice system. However, natural justice, more precisely the jungle law is another word of justice, which is consistent with a more powerful profit. This is clearly incomplete justice, as justice and justification are not always strong. Or justice may help a friend and hurt the enemy. Like a group of animals that can not be killed by themselves. Therefore, we see many different forms of justice in nature. Of course, justice can not have different definitions. For example, if there is just for the benefit of a person with a strong justice, it can not help a friend and harm an enemy. (For example, if a friend is an enemy, one acts for the enemy and the other means for your own death, but acts for their own interests.) Justice

The court of Tushnet is divided by R. Anastasia Tremaine - In February 2005, A Court Divided Tushnet (2005) of Tushnet reported on the current Supreme Court and the impact on the future in research entitled A Court Divided What did you investigate in detail? Especially since the 2000 general election was finally submitted to the government judiciary, there have been many discussions about the court. The Constitution has always been an attractive theme because it proposes areas to guarantee legal protection. In this article, I will study the procedures in the criminal justice system. Before laying the foundation for this work, I will briefly introduce the contents of the criminal justice system. The criminal justice system is a collection of laws and social institutions that enforce the criminal law, while observing a series of clear procedural rules and restrictions. And Dignan, J. (2007) The procedure in the criminal system has already been stated as "starting only when crime is reported to the police" (page 2). When a crime occurs, the main content of the relevant criminal justice system is the law enforcement agency, otherwise it is the police. The police 's top priority is to investigate the crime and make an appropriate arrest. The power of the police is dominated by the states in which they are engaged and engaged. In the United States, criminal management and judicial administration are handled by the criminal justice system. The criminal justice system consists of three major and distinguishable elements of police, court, and disciplinary action. These components are also called subsystems. From this point of view, the components of the criminal justice system are considered to be interrelated, interdependent and working to achieve a unified goal. The prospect of this criminal trial tends to focus on how the incident flows in the system, causing a chain reaction when an incident is transferred from one component to another component. For example, the behavior of the street police affected the work of the court, and the decision of the judge of the court affected the operation of the prison and the prison. The police occupy a special position in the criminal justice system. Act of the executive officers of the law affects the function of the entire criminal justice system, and only affects the police and does not say the "gatekeeper" of the system: "In many cases, these people's condemnation perpetrator It is the first contact and what happens to make what the position of some very important decisions is to decide to make the most of the police ...... in the American criminal justice Journey of criminal suspected maze "(Alpert and Danham, 1997: 11)

Denzel Washington will do veteran L.A.P.D. DET. Sergeant 13 years, Alonzo Harris was at the forefront of drug warfare. He is committed to protect and serve the citizens of Los Angeles, but his optimism about police work has long been weakened by the reality of street life. A closely related official of the team who reported to him and him, crossed the boundary between legitimacy and corruption. They noticed that they violated the law they should enforce. In this article, I will study the procedures in the criminal justice system. Before laying the foundation for this work, I will briefly introduce the contents of the criminal justice system. The criminal justice system is a collection of laws and social institutions that enforce the criminal law, while observing a series of clear procedural rules and restrictions. And Dignan, J. (2007) The procedure in the criminal system has already been stated as "starting only when crime is reported to the police" (page 2). When a crime occurs, the main content of the relevant criminal justice system is the law enforcement agency, otherwise it is the police. The police 's top priority is to investigate the crime and make an appropriate arrest. The power of the police is dominated by the states in which they are engaged and engaged. In the United States, criminal management and judicial administration are handled by the criminal justice system. The criminal justice system consists of three major and distinguishable elements of police, court, and disciplinary action. These components are also called subsystems. From this point of view, the components of the criminal justice system are considered to be interrelated, interdependent and working to achieve a unified goal. The prospect of this criminal trial tends to focus on how the incident flows in the system, causing a chain reaction when an incident is transferred from one component to another component. For example, the behavior of the street police affected the work of the court, and the decision of the judge of the court affected the operation of the prison and the prison.

How do you prosecute for a crime and you want to be deprived of your rights because of your race? This happened because Mark Charles Parker raped a pregnant white woman in Walters in June on February 23, 1959. In Howard Smid 's historic non - fiction book, Blood Justice, he mentioned one of the most important racial discrimination and motivational crime investigations in history. America Blood Justice is about the killing of Mark Charles Parker and the investigation after his death. Historian Howard Smed said, "Thieves hope Lynch can exceed certain punishments." The mobs changed this behavior to a symbolic ceremony and the black victims became representatives of his race so they were disciplined for multiple crimes ... deadly actions Warning Negatives do not object to their best position White race. "EJI has created statistics based on Tuskegee statistics and integrated information such as newspaper archives and other historical records. Reconstruction of ethnic terrorists in 1877 and 1950, and reconstruction of 300 people in other states Blood forensic evidence is the most common, most recognized and most important evidence in the field of criminal justice. In the history of violent and deadly crime, blood evidence has become a recently recognized forensic skill. "Blood is one of the most important and frequently encountered types of physical evidence related to forensic investigation of death and violent crime" (Eckert & James, 11). When violent crime occurs ... Computer forensics survey case item 14-2 Computer forensics is to acquire confidential data from technology for personal and investigation purposes. An experienced computer forensics staff will work with the police to verify the evidence of the lawsuit. Since the evidence is acceptable and must be useful in the court, this part of the investigation must always be carried out carefully, accurately and professionally. In this case, I will follow I currently focus on the investigation of court crime scenes, major in criminal justice, and a junior in Virginia Commonwealth University. They process evidence of crime scenes by identifying fingerprints, identifying blood marks, hair, saliva, and other elements you may encounter on the scene. I do not want to become an officer, but I think it is very important to establish a good relationship between social media and law enforcement agencies.

What happened to the juvenile justice? There is a big controversy over the trial and judgment of today's juvenile offender. Many people would argue that the seriousness of the results should rise as the severity of juvenile delinquency rises; however, regardless of the seriousness of the crime, juvenile offenders suffer far more than they deserve The possibility is high. Most teenagers feel that it is difficult to acquire some form of human rights in adulthood. Adult prison is not an environment that children should experience. Juvenile Justice: History and Philosophy, Juvenile Justice: Regional Therapy, Juvenile Judiciary: Facilities, Juvenile Justice: Juvenile Trial, Adult Crime, Juvenile Crime, Juvenile Crime, Police In the case of a potential criminal, each style of school and crime Encyclopedia.com can not guarantee all references it generates because there are subtle differences in the evolving proprietary format and not all information about all reference entries or articles is available. Therefore, we recommend that you use Encyclopedia.com citation as a starting point before checking the styles based on school and publication requirements and the latest information provided on these sites. A detailed explanation of the juvenile justice process is outside the scope of this report. The Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Bureau briefly outlines the structure and process of the juvenile justice system and the process. Professor Michele Deitch has a more comprehensive overview of the history, standards, legislation, and contemporary issues of the juvenile justice system in China. National Correction Research Institute, "Quality Practice Desktop Guide for Cooperation with Young People in Prison" (2014). A

Waking up in our country, the new campaign of advocates and activists against the story that moved to the era after racial discrimination. This is a movement to insist on black lives and to assert that all of us recognize the deep systematic structural racial discrimination that exists in our country today. This is an exercise that requires us to face past and present inequities so that we can move forward together and build a free and fair state. Certainly, racism is deeply rooted in our school, workplace, criminal justice system and hospital. Please think about that. Caucasians occupy unbalanced power positions in our society at the expense of colored people. When supporting the Black Lives Matter campaign, we got a big response - not only overwhelming support but also confused misunderstanding, honest questions and sad, some hatred. But one thing became clear. It started a conversation We understand that you better understand our ethnic problems, recognize the existence of systematic racial discrimination and the implicit prejudice that we all bring, and ultimately appeal to us all Appeal: Go hand in hand with one another The color of change helps people deal effectively with the unfairness of the world around us. As a nationwide online force driven by over 1 million members, they allow business and government decision makers to create a more humanitarian and hostile world for African Americans I will. Learn about leadership in racial justice and educational equality in your area. Listen to the best ways to support these efforts. I am participating in the National Judicial Justice Show. This is a nationwide organization that organizes white racial justice and builds a network for families. Join an interactive webinar to train conscious children and encourage people to participate in the conversation at Embrace Race. Please register for seminars to resolve racial discrimination. If you are an immigrant domestic worker - an employer of a childcare provider, a house cleaning contractor, or a family waiter - they will join the Sanctuary Homes event in Hand in Hand, which is the current goal of the government . If you are a teacher, please visit Teching Tolerance. Support the school's dignity to fight the school's pipeline to prison Race Forward's mission is to build awareness, solutions, and leadership for racial justice by creating innovative ideas, information and experiences. We define racial justice as systematic and fair treatment of all races, create equitable opportunities and results for all people, promote racial justice through training media, research and leadership I will strive. " Racial justice is an important issue for all Americans. As a Democrat, we should lead our commitment to racial justice by listening to people in our color. It is necessary to always know that racial justice covers all fields of sex, class, geography and gender identity. We need to concentrate on everything, such as employment, criminal justice reform, closing of private prisons, promotion of diversification of business, residence. As a vice president I would like to cooperate closely to promote racial justice within the Democratic Party. We should always remind everyone that # sayhername # blacklivesmatter

Throughout history, writers present justice in various forms. The story of Odyssey and King Oedipus presents similar justice. The Old Testament Joseph's story gives a different approach to justice. Justice written in Greek is often quick, rigorous and almost straightforward. By rewarding the victim, Joseph's story is an indirect punishment for criminals. In the Odyssey, the crews of Odysseus were severely punished primarily for their life. The justice of our time is almost completely different from the justice the ancient Greeks believed. Justice can be defined today as the principle of fairness and morality. During ancient Greek times, of course, when the story of the Odyssey took place, the judiciary was often immediate and rigid, almost unwavering. Odysseus is sometimes regarded as a person of justice or righteousness. "Odyssey" regards justice as revenge, but you can use it to say that Odysseus is a legitimate figure. In ancient Greece people believed that justice came from social order - good society promoted justice and justice promoted good society. For Plato (428 - 348 BC) and its contemporaries, justice is regarded as the most important virtue of our relationship. Plato believes that justice is a bond that connects society. Individualism and individual rights have nothing to do with Plato's justice concept This concept also fascinates collectivists who emphasize the social background of today's justice. Followers of Platonic justice tend to put faith in the country. Mr. Carl Popper even insisted that the concept of Plato's justice is the same as adopted by modern totalitarianism. Translations of sources of ancient Greece, especially Plato's translation, usually translate the Greek word δίκη (dike) into "justice". It is worth noting that when reading Plato and other ancient Greek materials the history of the modern English word "justice" is full of the meaning and implications of ancient Greece. Conversely, the ancient Greek embankment means natural behavior, or behaviors usually like behavior expressed by your group. Words do not have a moral meaning - it is not about how things should or should act, but how they usually do and how they usually behave I will not say that. This can be seen in many ancient Greek sources, including Homer and Hippocrates.

Introduction: Restorative judicial believes that damage caused by crime can be repaired (Wallis, 2007), victims and local communities can return to their original state rather than relying on criminal offenses (Liebmann, 2007). Currently, the criminal justice system is based on retaliatory justice for restorative justice, which is punishment for criminals (Milovanovic, 2007) and is a harm to the victim (Koneke, 2011). Restorative justice is a "non-confrontational and non-discriminatory process". "On the other hand, lawyers have no problems with conflict with lawyers." In a restorative justice model, the focus is on healing and reconciliation. Instead of punishing against retaliation. In the process, criminals are responsible for their crimes and are required to correct victims and larger communities. Van Wormer explained that restorative justice is particularly relevant to "marginalized communities, especially women". Likewise, Mr. Walker tells me that women are more vulnerable to confrontation systems given the gender bias in our culture. She explained that colored women are more vulnerable than white women as political parties facing more social prejudices are in a more disadvantageous position in conflict systems. "If one is bigger and stronger than the other, how can the fight between them be fair?" Walker further stated that restorative justice is essentially a feminist. She writes that instead of "custody, authoritarianism, and confrontation", "justice of recovery is based on strength and respects individuals as the subject of their own life." Van Warmer also believes that the use of restorative justice often encourages women and often matches feminism to promote our voice. Van Wormer explained that what is particularly relevant to female victims is the following feminist values: a personal story relying on women; reality holistic, including unification of individuals and politics, branching Accept no viewpoint; select and select gender of social power relations; and emphasize individual's empowerment and dignity

"My dog's reputation spreads throughout our Ozark, they are the best in that country" (Rolls 131). This is a reference in the book "Red Fern" by Wilson Rawls. The place where a red fern grows is a book about a boy, Billy and his two raccoon hunting dogs. Three of them have many adventures, and many of them introduce an inevitable theme of change. First, when Billy discusses with the children in the town, part of the book is a good example of the inevitable change in the theme. The place where the red fern grows Wilson Wilson's novel "Red Fern growing place" is a boy's story, his two hound dogs (he is the name Laodan and Xiao), and their shared adventure stories. They are loving trioes that separate the dark hills and riverbeds of Cherokee country. Lao Dan has muscle, Shaoan has a brain, Billy has the intention to train them to become the best hunting team in the valley. Glory and victory are waiting for them, but sorrow is waiting ... - Ignorance breathes life when you see a small amount of evil but is ignored. Evil is grown up and strengthened, gradually taking over the potential profitable possibilities. But when evil is everywhere and it is difficult to gain good, the same evil is now normal. During wartime, the good man became a murderer, the bad guy became a habit. The nuances between good and evil are blurred to meaningless smear in the eyes of reality. "My dog's reputation spreads throughout our Ozark, they are the best in that country" (Rolls 131). This is a reference in the book "Red Fern" by Wilson Rawls. The place where a red fern grows is a book about a boy, Billy and his two raccoon hunting dogs. Three of them have many adventures, and many of them introduce an inevitable theme of change. First, when Billy discusses with the children in the town, part of the book is a good example of the inevitable change in the theme. I do not remember reading a place where red ferns grew for the first time where red ferns grew, as I described by Wilson Rawls. I saw it about 10 years old, but I do not remember how many times I read it. This is a time in my life, but puberty has not yet begun This is an era when animals are my greatest love. The place where a red fern grows is a novel about a little boy and two dogs, but especially for animal lovers. The story is told in the first person stories, adults remember his childhood; the reader experiences life through the eyes of an eleven year old boy living in the Ozark Mountains of Arkansas.

Can you help restore a criminal youth? How do forensic pathologists know how to handle crime scenes? What is Miranda's decision? How does it affect the rights of people arrested or detained? These are just a few of the problems that our criminal justice process can solve. This balances the comprehensive referral and correction of criminal law and provides you with the basic skills you need to get started in this field. The PCC Criminal Justice program offers a variety of courses that outline the criminal justice system, with a focus on criminal investigation, forensic and police reporting elements. State and federal law enforcement agencies are often recruiting graduates because they provide strict, comprehensive and quality education. We believe that you will agree. We are good at training your understanding of laws, procedures, and applications to deal with crime. Our PCC Criminal Justice Department has extensive education and experience in rural and state police, correctional facilities, and federal investigative agency. Only teachers who have experience, have correct procedural knowledge and understanding of criminal law can teach our course. In other words, you can master the latest related skills. City, county and state agencies give us the highest score of the program. Many of our graduates continue pursuing a higher degree Our program already has elements of ongoing education and training for criminal justice professionals working in this field. This program will help you acquire a degree, prepare for a promotion, and acquire the expertise of a specific criminal justice program. You can acquire the skills necessary to extend your career. In addition, our program includes a professional criminal justice seminar on topics that are currently and noticed. We also have state-of-the-art equipment including educational class crime scene scenes. The professor of criminal justice is a professor of a university or a university who teaches a higher education course of criminal justice and criminal psychology. In addition, Criminal Justice Professor has published research reports on various topics related to criminal psychology and justice. The professor balances the weekly schedule with the responsibilities of teachers and departments, preparing lectures, teaching students, student work, studying criminal justice topics, consulting government and public agencies and private companies, I will travel for research and academic purposes. Introducing Criminal Justice Criminal justice is a broad subject and labor force. At the present time, the United States and the world need more criminal justice than ever. The criminal justice system has been improved throughout the history by changing the purpose of people who accept law enforcement officials and orders. The purpose of this analysis is to break the theme of three criminal justices: juvenile justice system, prison life and prison. In the United States, the justice system has two aspects for juvenile offenders and adults. The adult judicial system is known as the criminal justice system. This is a system whereby criminals are arrested, tried, declared and imprisoned. The juvenile justice system applies to children under the age of 18. The origin of the juvenile system dates back to 1925. For people pursuing criminal justice professionals and criminal justice degrees it is important to understand the differences between youth and the criminal justice system. The laws that govern minors differ from country to country, but there are several things that may generally differ from the criminal system. An important function of the criminal justice system is to enforce the court's ruling when an individual is convicted. Juvenile justice is part of the criminal justice system dealing with young criminals. The main purpose of juvenile justice is to prevent young people from committing future crimes. Since deterrence is more important than punishment, the behavior of the

Wilson Rawls raised a red fern where Billy's boy lived on the farm. He wants two good hounds and is very bad, but his Pap can not afford him anything. Billy finally decided he had to work hard to sell fruits and food to fishermen, so he eventually had enough money for the dog. He handed the money to his grandfather and his grandfather ordered the dog for him. Billy stepped into the city in the middle of the night and went to pick him up. In the city, other kids chose him, but he got up and got help from the local sheriff. "My dog's reputation spreads throughout our Ozark, they are the best in that country" (Rolls 131). This is a reference in the book "Red Fern" by Wilson Rawls. The place where a red fern grows is a book about a boy, Billy and his two raccoon hunting dogs. Three of them have many adventures, and many of them introduce an inevitable theme of change. First, when Billy discusses with the children in the town, part of the book is a good example of the inevitable change in the theme. I do not remember reading a place where red ferns grew for the first time where red ferns grew, as I described by Wilson Rawls. I saw it about 10 years old, but I do not remember how many times I read it. This is a time in my life, but puberty has not yet begun This is an era when animals are my greatest love. The place where a red fern grows is a novel about a little boy and two dogs, but especially for animal lovers. The story is told in the first person stories, adults remember his childhood; the reader experiences life through the eyes of an eleven year old boy living in the Ozark Mountains of Arkansas. The place where the red fern grows Wilson Wilson's novel "Red Fern growing place" is a boy's story, his two hound dogs (he is the name Laodan and Xiao), and their shared adventure stories. They are loving trioes that separate the dark hills and riverbeds of Cherokee country. Lao Dan has muscle, Shaoan has a brain, Billy has the intention to train them to become the best hunting team in the valley. Glory and victory are waiting for them, but sorrow is waiting ... - Ignorance breathes life when you see a small amount of evil but is ignored. Evil is grown up and strengthened, gradually taking over the potential profitable possibilities. But when evil is everywhere and it is difficult to gain good, the same evil is now normal. During wartime, the good man became a murderer, the bad guy became a habit. The nuances between good and evil are blurred to meaningless smear in the eyes of reality.

The interpretation of Plato of justice seen in the "Republic" is quite different from what we and the philosophers of his own era are accustomed to. Plato would say that justice is an act of fulfilling his duties. Furthermore, if a person's duties require lying to a person or promising something that is not traditionally seen in justice, this is also taken into account by Plato of the "Republic". I will do my best to discuss his argument because I believe that the explanation of Plato's justice and his possible opposite defense are clear and logical. In Plato Republic, Plato investigates the question "What is justice?" Plato's goal is to prove that justice (or "virtue") is worthy of itself. To prove his theory, Plato mainly deals with social political justice, then he develops personal justice. As Socrates was a Plato teacher, Plato used Socrates as a republican philosopher. Some of the ideas mentioned in the book may have been developed by Socrates, some of which are the result of Plato's idea. In the fourth part of Plato's "Republic", Socrates defines individual justice as well as state justice. I explained the definition of Socrates' s personal justice, then Socrates shows that he can not prove the correct definition of justice and raises further questions about justice. I assert that if we act according to this justice definition, we do not know when to take action. - In this article I will look into the Socratic argument of the Phaedo and Plato in the Republic of Plato in detail. First, I will first analyze the debate of human morality between the Republic, Socrates and the Glaucon. Discussion first defines a good community ethics and continues to apply this definition to humans. Then I will analyze Socrates' assertions about the immortality of the soul, the faedo. The essence of Socrates, Plato and justice is generally considered an important virtue. It is a symbol of truly free and fair society and is seen as a good sign of morality. Ordinary people may regard justice as a country where the crime is not universal and individuals are fair and have mutual understanding. - Keleah Johnson Greto PY 317 October 10, 2014 Comparison and comparison Many philosophers are known for their position and belief. Plato and Aristotle are the most famous philosophers. Plato was a student of Socrates once, and it turned out that he was a teacher of Aristotle. That is why both Plato and Aristotle cover most of the same issue topic, and that there is direct contrast between themes and similarities.

Restorative justice is a judicial approach focusing on the needs of victims and criminals rather than meeting legal rules and needs. Illegal acts of illegal acts / illegal acts of retaliatory justice restorative justice are targeted to the authorities and they violate laws or policies. Illegal acts / illegal actions are defined as actions against victims and local communities that violate the trust of people and communities. Accountability is the same as pain. They are accountable if they are suffering enough (ie banishment or pause). Definition of accountability is responsible for action and repairs damages caused by these actions. Success depends on how much rewards are realized Violations are defined by cheating / crime. Victims are defined as material and psychological losses Criminal definition is the ability to take responsibility for their behavior and change behavior. Victims are the ability to participate in the recovery of the process of loss and healing. Bad behavior / crime is a result of situations that have personal and social levels, leading to personal choice and behavior. The main way used by the rebel judicial government to cope with criminal offenses is legal retaliation. The retaliatory judicial tradition rooted in moral and utilitarian inference requires accountability for criminal misconduct through indictment and punishment. According to the theory of retaliatory justice, when a criminal commits a crime against another, they destroy basic moral and legal equality among people. In order to restore the broken relationship between the victim and the victim and restore their moral equality, the criminals are reduced by public denunciation and the victims must restore their previous moral status It will not. Retaliation is the process of recovering this basic equality. Therefore, if a country does not prosecute criminals, it will escape punishment and destroy the moral foundation of political society. It is important to understand that the US criminal justice system is functioning under the retaliatory judicial system in order to understand the differences in the methods brought by restorative judicial system. Retaliatory justice is based on the concept of punishment and the theory behind it is the ability to punish people who believe the state is the ultimate victim of crime and therefore believe to be a criminal. This type of judicial trial is one of the foundations for severely punishing drug-related crime and other 'innocent crimes'. Under the theory of retaliatory justice, the country is positioned as a victim The most important way in restorative criminal justice is the result of a process different from retaliatory and rehabilitation justice. Retaliable justice often saves criminals from confessing and repaying victims and communities. By contrast, restorative justice corrects mistakes made and attempts to repair damages suffered by victims, criminals and communities. But when demanding public safety to be imprisoned, it should be part of a resolution. Examples of the results of restorative trials include compensation, community service, victims - criminal reconciliation and so on.

Justice is the "correct" moral concept we believe as a society, morality, reason, law, religion, fairness, and justice. Justice requires the principle of democracy that is consistent with "rule of law". The rule of law is a concept that indicates that all decisions need to be made according to the law. No one can be exempted from the law Respecting the rule of law is an important condition for maintaining democracy and justice. It ensures that all individual decisions and actions are in accordance with national law. It also prevents people with power from deciding our lives in arbitrary and unpredictable ways based on their personal hatred, prejudice, or belief, not what the law allows. . The rule of law protects us by ensuring that laws are applied equally to all of us; those exercising power are guided by law, not by their own opinion, our lives There is no one with absolute power. The rule of law only works when the court acts in an independent, fair, open and transparent way. It is important for our citizens to understand our rights through the rule of law. Then we can protect them and discover failures and changes in demand. After all, the countries that actively support the rule of law are countries that often have freedom from prosperity, peace, freedom and corruption. So what is justice? Justice is a virtue that allows us to take responsibility and provide sufficient responsibility to others. Therefore, the catheter of the Catholic Church and the answer (# 1807) says, "Justice is the virtue of morality, giving God and his neighbor a constant and solid will, God's justice is" virtue of religion " It is called. Justice respects each person's rights and establishes harmony in interpersonal relationships that promote equality between people and public interests. What is justice? Aristotle understands what it is to act bravely or calmly by looking back on virtue in the analysis of other virtues such as courage and moderation. In a sense, virtue defines behavior. When it is justice, the exception is that analysis is performed in the opposite direction - action defines virtue. Justice and virtue are understood as a tendency to become fair, just and fair. We can provide a substantive explanation, but we will not consider the character of justice. Aristotle's language is mainly moralism People currently regard justice as the principle of institution and society, but the ancient Greeks regarded it as the virtue of citizens. This paper analyzes Aristotle's justice in his ethical moral method and discusses the nature of virtue, the virtue of citizens, the virtue of citizens, the virtues of citizens' justice, and the prospects of fair virtue There. Since it can be said that institutional justice virtue is a specific personality, Aristotle defines the virtue of justice as a feature of justice, citizens act fairly and want to do justice. Because it is social ethics, the virtue of justice is also a personal moral virtue different from others. We can call the virtue of justice "non-personal personal moral virtue". It is interpreted as pure altruism and self-interest, which is a misunderstanding.

The concept of justice is recognized and misunderstood at the same time worldwide. The Oxford English Dictionary defines justice as "quality of existence (moral) justice or justice." Because of such a short definition it is impossible to think that the word justice is superficial. On the contrary, this ancient word may start with a simple meaning, but it developed greatly based on its existence. The way civilization evolved evolved civilization. Many people will understand the term I'm using - the Millennium social justice defender - as a synonym for the contempt 'social justice fighter'. This is the term used to trigger the weakness of overuse, but it indicates an important problem. In a typical demonstration of a dazzling horseshoe style theory, the special brand of sustainable supporters of this millennium distorted the splendid cause of social, economic and political equality to social authoritarian movements. Isolated ideological academic theory based on division and inhumanization The modern social justice movement was published on Twitter, Tumblr, Facebook, Jezebel, Slate, Huffington Post etc Reminiscent of red panic over civil rights movement (choose one) Professor Frank Roberts of New York University gave a wonderful speech at Columbia University Law School's "Broadway Black Life Issues" event. He elaborated on four major ways to understand the tendency to be misunderstood. But Frank Roberts should be introduced correctly before I dig into it. Roberts is a young intelligent intellectual who is the political organizer of the front line of the Black Lives Matter movement. In the past, he was active in Ferguson and New York City. In addition, Professor Roberts taught the first BLM course at New York University and created the Black Lives Matter syllabus. Frank Roberts explains the movement of BLM as follows. Restorative justice is a widely misunderstood concept. Information that is open to the public is limited. It does not matter how it works or how it works. Unfortunately, the information people frequently interact with is often misunderstood. If there are no other reasons, it is not because it is part of our "Criminal Law", understand what the restorative justice is and how it functions in the Canadian justice system It is important to do. Restorative justice is the law, its ignorance is also harmful. In addition, there is evidence that the use of restorative justice can reduce the likelihood that a criminal commits another crime (Elizabeth Elliott, Restorative Trial (Burnaby, Simon Fraser University for the Criminology, 2013), 82 ). According to the survey, by encouraging criminals to take responsibility for their behavior, compensating for these behaviors and learning from the whole process can reduce recidivism.

Before I started writing this paper, of course I looked "fair" in that dictionary. This means that justice is related to impartiality. I believe that if one of the concerns of law and institution is to support and promote justice and "justice", they may not do such beautiful work. Eyes for the eyes are fair. No, it's too easy, it's too dark. In a broad sense, I think there are three answers to the question "What is justice". There is a practical answer that justice means maximizing happiness. The answer is Emmanuel Conde's second answer. He states that justice is a matter of human dignity, certain obvious obligations and respect for rights. The third answer is Aristotle's answer. Justice gives you what you deserve and what you deserve is dependent on your own strengths and solutions to better life issues. The meaning of the word "justice" The introduction pointed out that one of the purposes of the Constitution is "to establish justice". What does justice mean? Justice usually means fairness. The meaning of justice has been questioned in the history of humankind for more than 2000 years and it is still a controversial point today. The concept of justice has long been divided into three types: correction of distribution justice, procedural justice and justice. Burden may include obligations such as homework, domestic affairs, earning money, tax payment, jury work, care for others. They contain almost everything that can be assigned to a group that is deemed unwelcome, such as punishment for accusations and misconduct. Problems and controversies concerning equitable distribution of social welfare and burden, such as medical welfare and tax discussions, are spreading and are often questioned quite often. The common division of subjects distinguish between justice correction and distribution. Corrective justice deals with the distribution of people as punishments. This is caused by benefits and burdens other than punishment. Within the scope of justice correction, there is a disagreement about the justification of punishment itself. However, fair penalty criteria are generally agreed, only appropriate punishment should be punished and the number of punishments must reflect the seriousness of the crime.

The criminal justice system is a group of organizations that cooperate to protect society, prevent criminals, manage them, support justice, and enforce social norms. As the years go on, society continues to evolve and its criminal justice system and its way to achieve its role in society continues to evolve. This brief analysis will evaluate the main facts that have influenced the criminal justice system for decades and will affect the evolution of the justice system in a changing society (Muraski, 2009). Jefferson and Shapland (1990) documented the ways in which the trends in criminal justice research clearly relate to broader political and economic problems. One of the trends is the growing public's interest in the 'consumer' of the criminal justice system, which is not a criminal but mainly a crime victim. This growing concern has developed comparatively satisfactorily. The difference of this order - "Consumptionism" and the difference of concept of free market - are not attracting much attention in free-market theorist's own words. They did not show much interest in the current public political debate. They measure the great success of Western social free market theorists and politicians in mobilizing nearly universal and popular political languages, focusing on the idea of ​​"freedom" and "choice" I can not do. When it becomes a concept of modern crime, it is often associated with Western ideas and criminal justice concepts. In fact, the vast majority of today's criminal justice system is directed to western criminal beliefs. Therefore, most society is Western-oriented. With this increasing trend, the nature of crime needs to be tested as a social structure. On the other hand, the theory that an individual's crime is not a problem can be seen as a traditional form of researching the nature and meaning of a crime. Since individuals are the focus of this criminal effort, we can say that the social impact from this point of view is not as general as the scholars think. In fact, in a traditional sense, society does not significantly affect individual crimes. The biggest trend occurring in the profession of criminal justice is the rise of technology. Currently, various criminal justice experts urgently need to understand, incorporate and accept technology. Technology will not disappear rapidly from society and will play an important role in society. In the criminal justice system, technology will influence how people in the system are captured, processed and identified.

The justice theory "justice" is an elusive concept and the legal system seems to be trying to achieve this goal. We believe that justice is what we all want from law and that it should be an integral part of every legal system. However, it is difficult to define the meaning of justice. We may question justice, that is, many aspects of specific laws. Whether the legal system is fair or not. Many problems of justice are very controversial, and questions such as whether a combination of law and institution will yield fair results are raised. This book attracts several articles about the justice I wrote between 2000 and 2010. Judging from books and articles created by academic and political philosophers, this is a good 10 years to write about justice, but not just for justice itself. In this context, justice means right and opportunity, income and wealth, justice in the distribution of goods and services. This term is a problem, but it will soon be called social justice. Philosophers who are writing about justice think that in most cases they need some form of equality, which forms of debate should be chosen, the size of the judicial network, and the goals for individual political communities There was intense debate. There is also intense debate about equality in the world or equality in the world. However, no matter how you understand the concept of justice, the real world seems to develop in the opposite direction. For John Rock (1632-1704), the concept of justice is an important basic theme in his entire political mind. In the case of Locke, natural justice sets restrictions through the concept of natural rights and shows the direction of citizen justice. Furthermore, at the most basic level, the theory of justice in rock is not even natural rights theory. The rights of individuals can not be transferred, but they are still based on the laws of nature and are thus restricted. Locke believes that without personal wealth, there is no justice without property, and justice can not be imagined. The essence of Locke's justice is the safety of all personal property as a right under the law of nature.

More and more probation officers, judges, prosecutors and other youth experts advocate the juvenile justice system. These groups are disappointed with the uncertainty of policies between retaliation and treatment and the expectations of unrealistic and unclear ordinary citizens. As a main task, with a balanced approach or policy, the juvenile justice system can work with that institution to improve the ability to protect the community and ensure accountability to institutions and offenders. This document proposes a new philosophical framework, restorative justice, new mission of juvenile justice, equilibrium approach. As a new "paradigm" or "scope" to observe crime and its correspondence, a balanced restorative justice model should provide a coherent blueprint for major reforms to change the role and image of youth I can. The justice system changes from "acceptance" and "expansion of the door" to "resource". As a resource to manage the juvenile judiciary and promote accountability and youth development, the reconstructed juvenile justice system is based on the quality of life and the reconstruction of the community, the capacity of the victim, the risk management, and through the victim Improve preventive services aimed at improving public safety. Like the juvenile justice system advocated by other juvenile experts, it is largely based on restorative justice. These groups are disappointed with the uncertainty of policies between retaliation and treatment and the expectations of unrealistic and unclear ordinary citizens. As a first task, with a balanced approach or policy, the Juvenile Justice System cooperates with that institution to protect the community and ensure that the system Most juvenile justice systems are primarily affected by current retaliatory justice concepts and individual treatment issues, but include elements of several policies and practices consistent with balanced recovery goals It is. Ability development interventions such as recovery, victim mediation, meaningful community service practices, even strengthening occupational experience and regional safety improvement are the cornerstones for further recovery practices. In addition, a new example program that achieves the three objectives of a balanced mission within the program and provides a potential holistic model for institutional reform, suggested by balanced restorative justice You can point out.

What makes adults grown It is based on their age. I become an adult automatically when I turn 18. When a convicted juvenile offender is tried and received adult punishment. Why? Underage criminals should be tried and sentenced as adults. Children are not just teenagers. They can do whatever they can do. "If you want to be treated like an adult, it's like an adult." They can "commit" only adults should be treated like adults. People are also judged and sentenced to prison. There are many similarities and differences between the adult judicial system and the juvenile justice system and CJ 150. Boys' crime Josh Skaggs Adults and juvenile justice system. The violence and intensification of juvenile delinquency have increased in the past 10 years, but there are still sufficient differences between the two legal procedures and the action itself to maintain system separation. Each structure has various spaces. But we can not treat / punish a young man who has a negative effect on our child and may make him or her illegal. The word "juvenile" from the word "juvenis" means young people. According to law, children and adolescents are considered minors. This is a person under 18 years old. On the other hand, juvenile delinquency or juvenile delinquency means that a minor or a person under the age of 18 is involved in illegal activities. Juvenile justice is a legal system whose mission is to protect children. It is the protection of children Juvenile Justice: History and Philosophy, Juvenile Justice: Regional Therapy, Juvenile Judiciary: Facilities, Juvenile Justice: Juvenile Trial, Adult Crime, Juvenile Crime, Juvenile Crime, Police In the case of a potential criminal, each style of school and crime Encyclopedia.com can not guarantee all references it generates because there are subtle differences in the evolving proprietary format and not all information about all reference entries or articles is available. Therefore, we recommend that you use Encyclopedia.com citation as a starting point before checking the styles based on school and publication requirements and the latest information provided on these sites. A detailed explanation of the juvenile justice process is outside the scope of this report. The Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Bureau briefly outlines the structure and process of the juvenile justice system and the process. Professor Michele Deitch has a more comprehensive overview of the history, standards, legislation, and contemporary issues of the juvenile justice system in China. National Correction Research Institute, "Quality Practice Desktop Guide for Cooperation with Young People in Prison" (2014). A

b: principle or ideal of a legitimate deal; also in line with the principles or ideals of a previous deal Types of justice: justice as revenge (retaliation justice), justice as compassion, justice as harmony (equality and justice), justice as justice (must be treated equally as equality) redistribution of justice, as love Justice, justice as reconciliation and compensation (restorative justice) - Caucasian social science has a tendency to strengthen the public's negative perception of AA against AA by focusing on unstable black families rather than many stable black families There is -> the same Latin Americans are focusing on psychopathological problems encountered by Mexican Americans, they are like indigenous Americans -> these problems rather than social failure It is considered to be caused by an internal factor Social justice is our name, a common theme linking solutions for all social justice solutions, but what is the real meaning behind these words? What is the real definition of social justice? Wikipedia believes that "social justice" comes from religious terms that recognize the collective nature of human beings and our personal approach to helping others, but here are some common definitions there is. Socially fair society is defined as a principle based on equality and solidarity by its supporters and practitioners, and this pedagogy also thinks socially just society understands and Emphasize human rights, recognize everyone's dignity. - Wikipedia

There are sinful people who walk freely everyday. It is shocking that there are people committing bad crimes such as planned murder, freedom walking around and being allowed to enjoy nutrition and clothing for other lives. These people are taxpayers. Some of them are not worth living after committing a crime. For example, Joe Atkin is a man sentenced to 10 years imprisonment for murdering his brothers. When Blackback judge began issuing a statement, he explained in a sharp way that a convicted killer died of a fatal injection. As a case for this statement, he chose one of the more brutal cases in the murder case that often appears before us. The tavern's floor died of bleeding. Death shot as described by Blackmon judge seems highly desirable. Blackman in justice did not choose to be a tool declaring illegality and making the death penalty illegal, so it is now next to some of the other incidents in front of us now It looks even better. Four men stuffed the panties in the throat and killed. See McCollum versus North Carolina. In contrast, how much envy death will be caused by a deadly injection? There are five law enforcement methods in the United States. Fatal injection, electric shock, deadly gas, pause, shooting. According to the Texas State Criminal Justice Department in Texas, we prefer to inject deadly thiopental, bismuth bromide and potassium chloride. Thiopental (also known as Doshisha) is used to rob the prisoners, pancuronium bromide paralyzes the muscles and potassium chloride blocks the heart. If a medicine is injected or not activated in vivo prior to other medicine, it may lead to unfair and painful death.

Susan Glaspell 's play "Trifles" was written somewhat in 1916. This reflects the authors' attention to the gender and sex role stereotypes in between. As the play title suggests, women's attention is often thought of as a matter of little value and insignificant problem for male practical work in society. Those who are responsible for criminal investigation can not solve this mystery through what they call superior knowledge. Pierce, 2012 Little Things, Trivia in the farm 1389, 1916, overview, Mrs. Meteor_Slideshow Slideshow arp1 1 The trivial thing about what you most irritate is these papers on trivia. Ironically, six of the play, former nominal international funds are singing in birds of the cage. Your drama timetable For Susan Grass Pell's dilemma, there is an article about Graspel. British literature thesis on trivia prose: trivia of Susan Grasspell. When she was essayed by Susan Grasse Pile. Symbol of feminist at male university and true murder investigation in the mid-20th century Rosemary education represents so-called trivia of Susan grass spells. Write a bad credit role and novels. Susan Grass Pel and free trivia on how to play about research. Purchase of Susan grass spelling of custom writing services for piercing, trivia, society was written by Susan Grasspale's trivial things. Student 250,000 Free Trial Papers, 000 Free Papers: Interpretation of Articles on One Page What is paper title and Juliet doctor? Related shows how the gender of the two think about that process. Susan Grasper 's "trivial problem" in March 2015, then the society at the end was the end of the 19th century. See in the play part of the work: 1 In the drama "Trifles", Susan Grasspel collected three women through a criminal investigation at the end of the 19th century. Glaspell shows that justice for everyone is as important as finding the truth with symbolism, gender contrast, and well-structured letters. Perhaps the most popular literary tool at Trifle is the symbolic meaning of wealth. All women in the drama are equally important, but it will be stronger together. - In a short story by Susan Grasspel, Mrs. Wright was accused as killing her ex-husband, Mr. Wright. When their house is under investigation, there are many clues about what can happen between Mr. Wright and his wife. Susan Glaspell uses many lighting techniques to tell the reader what's going on throughout the story. Graspel uses sarcasm, symbols and themes to distinguish her role in Mrs. Wright's role in the murder and her role in the story.

I drove a limo and looked for a silly and ugly food truck for pancakes. I hate that it is ridiculous. Especially he just completed the ongoing task, so he plans to use it in the future. Even if he does not show it, I'm bothered and I will drive separately. I do not want to go to the truck, but I have to see them there anyway. I must drive in some way. Other orphans from Wammy's House did not personally cooperate with L. My present purpose of the court is to achieve justice. This simple explanation looks ambiguous, but it is still a very real fact. The court did a good job among politics, social work, and service justice. But the true mission of this court is not to judge whether it is right or wrong but to do good and evil, to maintain the justice system. Trying to solve a social dilemma is not determining the original purpose of the court but seeking justice and when proposing justice is to decide the most useful context for people's interests. Therefore, the social and political value of these decisions will be evaluated. The Court of Justice 14 elected to Pennsylvania comply with very high ethical standards and accept access to the service from the people they serve. Judge Kennedy agreed to his view that elected judges and judges, like most appointed judges, are usually most sincere. 5 He wrote as follows: To solve this incident ... We criticize the state's choice to use public elections to pick people who are likely to achieve the best judicial You should avoid. The country can freely choose this mechanism rather than appoint it. By criticizing the comprehensive judicial election, we secretly blamed countless elected state judges and did not get arrest warrants. Despite the difficulties brought about by the electoral system, many of them have found enlightenment, guidance and inspiration in the law, making them truly independent and faithful law scholars. Historical review of the US judicial election process: the electoral system in Pennsylvania is irrational Sandra Schultz Newman This is a sad story for LGBT's history book and justice system. Justice's integrity requires a judicial court that really mirrors the rich diversity of the community it serves. When a more open LGBT judge is in the benchmark, especially at the highest level it will enhance public confidence in the fairness of the system. But more importantly, the impact of history and institution, the damage caused by this vote will be felt directly by the LGBT community. Despite recent employment discrimination in the LGBT population, the legal barriers to accessing inequal parenting laws and medical care are not equal. Since the rights of LGBT people and their families are usually determined by the state courts it is important that the case is applied without prejudice by the judge. Unfortunately, people in LGBT are unlikely to face implicit discrimination of judges. The party and gay panicks confirmed the first public gay people to become the Supreme Court general secretary

Justice is actually the most important system of our government. For some people justice refers to the punishment received after being convicted; other people may think that this means knowing the difference between good and evil. In my opinion, justice with dictionary.com is best defined as just and equitable treatment of people. But this is not simply used in the court, but my definition should be used in every aspect of human life, from work to school and other aspects. However, in order to achieve this, we define "fair and equitable treatment" which means to treat people with skin color, gender, age, sexual orientation and other personal characteristics in the same way I think that it is necessary. The way the criminal justice system works to put black people in a disadvantageous position is systematic, pathetic, and often subtle. A summary of the new evidence from the Vera Judicial Institute summarizing the study summarizing how the history of racial discrimination and oppression in the United States continues to appear in the criminal justice system, "Unfair burden: in the criminal justice system Different treatment for black people. " Different treatment for black people. This evidence briefing took place when the conversation over the history of violence and discrimination against the black community in our country is attracting attention. The study confirmed that in the criminal justice system there is deep-seated racial discrimination in different treats of black Americans. Whether the justice system is fair or unfair does not matter. A bigger problem is whether the judicial system of that country is fair or unfair. This system is unfair to prosecuted criminals. For perpetrators, the system is fair. It is fair for the victim and the victim's family if the accused is guilty. Overall, I believe that our judicial system is fair. Sometimes those who do it are not. The population structure of China's metropolitan area is constantly changing. Los Angeles is currently mainly Latin American. Due to the simple fact that judges, juries and lawyers are affected by stereotypes, the whole court system seems to be biased towards the minority in general. This is not a good thing. The only way to change the trial system is to express our opinion in letters, demos, and education. Sophia: Our criminal justice system is regarded as this just judicial structure - it is called criminal justice system - it seems to be neither inequitable nor unfair. There is an unfair side I want to participate in. Sophia: Yes, a good way to change is to let the public know how it works in a way that makes the system flawed. There are also organizations that are finally imprisoned for the majority of the population and are about to end the pipeline from a particular school district to prison. In Milwaukee, there is a big problem - for African American men in their 30s there is more than 50% chance that they will be jailed at some point in their life (see below). There is also a project to change the relationship between climate police and the local community.

In the "Othello" drama by William Shakespeare, Iagos Justice lurks evil far beyond the darkness of the devil. Just because Iago was not an arbitrator, Othello was promoted through Iago, and he pledged to retaliate and destroy everything the wetlands and Othello take care. As a result, Iago played judges, juries and executioners, but the justice of Iago was justified or his justice was far beyond his righteousness. When you cross that line, it will be a no return. I 'm justice can never be justified. There is no reason to kill with cold blood for his own personal benefit, or due to the bloodshed of innocent people. When he decides to make his own law, Iago is entitled to any promotion or right he may possess. He should also have the power to influence and determine the destiny of others. I am hoping to "abuse Othello's ear" and Othello intends to convince his wife Dedemona that he is an adult "Female in the framework is false" (I.i.20). I 'm planning to take the devil to the ground to retaliate against Othello In the early days of drama, Iago realized that the concept of honor of Othello is intertwined with the concept of his justice. Every other character of Othello play is trapped in justice. I have recognized this; he noticed that he must violate his sense of justice in order to make Othello the beast. With this understanding, Iago developed his plan to let Othello kill Desdemona. He is convinced that Othello's manhood will be destroyed and his barbaric behavior will be revealed when his wife is murdered. In William · Shakespeare 's play "Othello" there is a kind of evil spanning the darkness of the devil, which is in the opponent' Iago '. Just because Iago was not an arbitrator, Othello was promoted through Iago, and he pledged to retaliate and destroy everything the wetlands and Othello take care. As a result, Iago played judges, juries and executioners, but the justice of Iago was justified or his justice was far beyond his righteousness. When you cross that line, it will be a no return. All obstacles that may be present are broken.

Our judicial system has failed to achieve the ideals of equality, justice, and justice in the United States. Our criminal and civil law system malfunction is serious. The United States is currently committing 3 million Americans - people with unbalanced colors - more than 25% of Americans are criminalized. Many of these people also have a burden of being able to select vast expenses and little to re-enter society. The Brennan Center's judicial process aims to ensure our country's commitment to "equality and justice" for all, by establishing a reasonable, effective and just judicial system. Focus is to reduce the number of imprisonments while reducing the crime rate. The program combines law, policy and economics to create new empirical analysis and innovative policy solutions to promote this important goal. We all need to pay attention to justice - this is the second thing the founder mentioned in the preamble of the Constitution - "establishment of justice". We all need to support justice - distorting the law to make second - class citizens is not justice. If our citizenship is fair, I do not need to ask for forgiveness. I will not ask for forgiveness before my felonies of my companion Racial justice is an important issue for all Americans. As a Democrat, we should lead our commitment to racial justice by listening to people in our color. It is necessary to always know that racial justice covers all fields of sex, class, geography and gender identity. We need to concentrate on everything, such as employment, criminal justice reform, closing of private prisons, promotion of diversification of business, residence. As a vice president I would like to cooperate closely to promote racial justice within the Democratic Party. We should always remind everyone that # sayhername # blacklivesmatter Economic justice is a unified issue in our time. Our commitment to economic justice must be rooted in great efforts to racial and sexual justice. As a Vice President I will be proactively committed to giving power to all the Democrats identified as the poor, the low-income, the working class, and the middle class. I will work hard to promote a strong message of economic justice that will be the growth of the Democratic Party. We need to support our union - the public sector and the private sector, construction industry and service sector. Economic justice will not be a "working white class" code and will not ignore the working class whites. I will be able to do a lot of things soon. This is the only way we can win. This includes working for economic justice in Puerto Rico, which is working to resolve the current situation.

When we first accepted this work, we were told that we had to write specific topics for the remaining semester. To be honest, I am overkill, but then I thought about some important topics and important things for me. I have reached the conclusion that if I am a teenager being tried as an adult in court, I will write these conclusions. This theme is related not only to my major subject but also to what I am really interested in. The problem with the current judicial system is that teenagers to be brought to the criminal court are not. Juvenile Justice: History and Philosophy, Juvenile Justice: Regional Therapy, Juvenile Judiciary: Facilities, Juvenile Justice: Juvenile Trial, Adult Crime, Juvenile Crime, Juvenile Crime, Police In the case of a potential criminal, each style of school and crime Encyclopedia.com can not guarantee all references it generates because there are subtle differences in the evolving proprietary format and not all information about all reference entries or articles is available. Therefore, we recommend that you use Encyclopedia.com citation as a starting point before checking the styles based on school and publication requirements and the latest information provided on these sites. Florida Juvenile Department of Justice (DJJ) plays an important role in the management of the Florida juvenile justice system and the court system. The mission of the Florida Juvenile Department of Justice (DJJ) is to "strengthen public safety through effective prevention, intervention, treatment services to reduce juvenile delinquency These services strengthen families, I can reverse the lives of a certain young man. " The central court tried detention within 24 hours after the arrest. It is usually held in the morning after being arrested. The judge will decide whether to release the accused, if so, what conditions are necessary to protect the victim. The judge may order the accused to "do not contact" with the victim or witness. If the judge does not release the accused, he or she can stay in the detention center for up to 21 days. Florida's criminal justice system handles children and adolesdifferently from adults. If your child is accused of juvenile crime, he or she will enter the Florida Juvenile justice system. The Juvenile Justice Department (DJJ) is focusing on the punishment of the above rehabilitation. Read on to learn the overview of the juvenile justice process. If a child or a young man is arrested for a crime, she will be sent to the Youth Evaluation Center where a reservation will be made and a fingerprint will be attached. She is awarded the detention risk assessment tool (DRAI) which provides a standardized way to judge whether detention is necessary or not. If she does not need to be detained, she will be released to the parent or guardian, but she will be sent to the juvenile detention center (JDC) if the DRAI indicates that detention is necessary.

The founder established a special law in the United States that gives citizens the freedom that the British refused to give to them. Documents written by the founder's father when they traveled to the country made it possible for them to enjoy the freedom of speech and religion. However, the Bill of Rights also gives citizens the right to justice. Many judges have exploited this right by expressing opinions on the case before hearing all the evidence against the parties. This principle, called judicial discretion, helps to weaken the standard system of judicial standards. A: The principle of 'blindness justice' symbolizes the public statue that the image of the statue of justice lifts the courts nationwide. Her eyes are blindfolded and have a scale of justice to express the ideals of the rule of law regardless of wealth, power, fame. However, in many cases crime victims in the United States feel pendulum has removed their rights. I focused on legislators on both sides of the aisle to focus on the victim's rights and to use the legislative and supervisory powers of the Senate Judiciary Committee. The ultimate goal is to listen carefully to abuses, trafficking, sexual violence, sexual assault on military and college campuses, and criminal voices of illegal immigration. As long as we (the public) have our own range of justice, justice is never effective. Justice is a package of morality, humanity, equality. In criminal cases, we will consider these three major factors. When you face justice, morality and humanity must be your turn. When a person commits a crime, it has many influences. For example, we study moral factors; victims may abuse their sons, and in the pain he may have committed a crime. Therefore, it is unfair to have this person take full responsibility for his misconduct. The judicial system has to balance ethics, humanity, and quality on the same scale. Weighing and evaluating each of these three elements of justice is by no means fair. Therefore, justice is nominal and theoretically valid, in fact it is not. Understanding whether or not the crime victim is satisfied (or dissatisfied) with the criminal justice system is not the same as understanding the reasons. In order to clarify this problem, I made three scales. Each scale contains several sacrificial problems. These measures measure perception of the overall satisfaction with the criminal justice system, the extent to which the victim feels informed about their rights, and the adequacy of the victim's impact statement. They are called Victim Satisfaction Scale, Informed Victim Scale, Victim Impact Scale.

The recovery trial is an innovative approach to the criminal justice system, focusing on repairing the damage caused by crime. While the method used in the traditional judicial system may prevent criminals from committing further crimes, they can neither repair the harm done nor recognize their responsibility, but they Insult, making it worse than deteriorating the situation 2003). "Stigma is a type of humiliation that causes abandonment, it is rude and disgraceful" (p. 85). Restorative justice is a "non-confrontational and non-discriminatory process". "On the other hand, lawyers have no problems with conflict with lawyers." In a restorative justice model, the focus is on healing and reconciliation. Instead of punishing against retaliation. In the process, criminals are responsible for their crimes and are required to correct victims and larger communities. Van Wormer explained that restorative justice is particularly relevant to "marginalized communities, especially women". Likewise, Mr. Walker tells me that women are more vulnerable to confrontation systems given the gender bias in our culture. She explained that colored women are more vulnerable than white women as political parties facing more social prejudices are in a more disadvantageous position in conflict systems. "If one is bigger and stronger than the other, how can the fight between them be fair?" Walker further stated that restorative justice is essentially a feminist. She writes that instead of "custody, authoritarianism, and confrontation", "justice of recovery is based on strength and respects individuals as the subject of their own life." Van Warmer also believes that the use of restorative justice often encourages women and often matches feminism to promote our voice. Van Wormer explained that what is particularly relevant to female victims is the following feminist values: a personal story relying on women; reality holistic, including unification of individuals and politics, branching Accept no viewpoint; select and select gender of social power relations; and emphasize individual's empowerment and dignity The modern practices of restorative justice being executed today are relatively new. Howard Zell, one of the best practitioners of restorative justice, started the current contact with restorative justice at the event held in Canada in 1974. The criminals went to the victim's house for settlement. .3 Zehr defines restorative justice participants and goals in a simple language. "Restorative justice is a process that is interested in a specific crime and enables a person to deal with collectively identifying risks and has an obligation to make it as accurate as possible. Recovery Justice and Retaliatory Justice: Exploring opportunities for cooperation or conflict of justice Donald · H · J · Hermann

Justice must be strong and you should seek support for the weak. How society "distributes" its wealth among its constituents. These are the problems. There are three basic aspects to this problem. The tolerance system gives individuals the right to make a living as a human being as an individual. In the Puritan system, people are required to have an intention to contribute at least to society in order to earn their living income. Finally, in personal opinion, we claim that individual ownership is sacred. Nobody can force him to take away his goods. Three related issues for institutions responsible for the scope of justice, justice for the distribution of wealth and other goods, and justice are the central issue of the worldwide justice problem. When these problems are solved in a situation that is not ideal, they are part of "Process Ethics" which is a division of political ethics. Is there an objective moral standard applied to all humans, regardless of their culture, race, sex, religion, nationality or other characteristic features, as moral universalists have claimed? Or does ethical standard only apply to limited background such as culture, country, community, voluntary association? When applying ethics in the field of criminal justice, we (general people) wish that all criminal justice experts are faithful to ethical standards, and apply for justice in a reasonable way. Therefore, criminal justice experts are forced to live and work in an environment where moral ambiguity becomes standard. But the question still exists, what are the moral and ethical standards? "Ethics is a study on what to do, the terms" moral "and" moral "are often used interchangeably. The word moral comes from Greek ethics. Morale from Latin - means customs, customs, or social norms Unfortunately, since morals and morals are not simply an explanation of behavior, customs or current practice, these deductions may be slightly misleading . (Ian Kerridge, Michael Lowe, John McPhee, 2005 p.1)

Social justice is a political and philosophical notion that all people should have equal access to wealth, health, welfare, justice and opportunity. Social justice is a broad concept not limited to a specific religious or political movement. In the United States, its supporters are mainly in the Democratic Party, especially on the approval within the party and the progress of wing of socialism. Progressiveists and socialists (independent, green parties, others) unrelated to the Democratic Party often use this term. All major religions contain at least one social justice movement. Liberation theology, starting with Latin American Catholics, is one of the most famous sports. (What is the socialist economy?) Self-identified social justice advocacy groups often contradict each other in specific policies and priorities, but race, religion, sexual orientation, gender identity, and linguistic groups are chosen from oppression and privilege For example, in the United States progressive people often promote reform of the criminal justice system, but I believe this is too strict for color people (especially blacks and Hispanics). They also criticized the health care system that they believe is ignoring women, poor people, immigrants, and people of color. They advocated reform of the immigration control system, arguing that millions of families prevented their ability to be demonstrated to their full potential. They believe that they promote equal wages for equal work and that women and people of color are being deprived Many people will understand the term I'm using - the Millennium social justice defender - as a synonym for the contempt 'social justice fighter'. This is a term that brings weakness by abuse, but it shows an important problem. In a typical demonstration of a dazzling horseshoe shape theory, the special brand of social justice supporters of this millennium distorted the splendid cause of social, economic and political equality to social authoritarian movements. Isolated ideology separates individuals and makes them inhuman. Academic Theory Contemporary social justice movements were published on Twitter, Tumblr, Facebook, Jezebel, Slate, Huffington Post etc It is reminiscent of red panic over civil rights movement (choose one) In the "Transformation Social Justice" section of this question we will explore what social justice is, what the social justice movement has achieved, and whether to translate the movement to effectively address today's most pressing issues . Noam Chomsky generously agreed to share his views on social justice and other topics with Seattle Social Justice magazine. On April 8, 2005, at SJSJ in Boston, Massachusetts, Michael Shankd, director of public relations for World Cultural Open, accepted an interview with Chomsky. SJSJ thanked Shank for his support and coordination for this dialogue. End Social justice is an important element in social work. Recently, a sample of 192 ANZASW members has completed a questionnaire that explains their attitude towards social justice, and the relevance between social justice and their practice. This review article provides a preliminary summary of their thinking and approach to social justice in this practice and reflects the various ways this practice is shaped and reflected by every aspect of social justice ing. Social welfare norms of the International Code of Ethics (including Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work Association (ANZASW), International Federation of Social Welfare Federations (IFSW)), official and informal discussions between social welfare literature and social workers produce social work Great attention to justice is the foundation of social work practice. As a representative example (Special edition of the UK social welfare magazine in 2002; Ferguson in 2008; 2007; Figeira - McDonough; 2007; Humphreys; 2008; Sowers & Rowe; 2007). )

The purpose of the judicial system is to balance unbalanced forces occurring after a crime. When committing a crime, perpetrators acquire power by accepting the security of the victims. This system needs to combine retaliatory justice and restorative justice to meet all the people involved in the crime. For example, after a crime, perpetrators will be punished in a fair way and you will need to teach him why the behavior is wrong. The victim needs to close his daily life and restart after his suffering. In this article, I will study the procedures in the criminal justice system. Before laying the foundation for this work, I will briefly introduce the contents of the criminal justice system. The criminal justice system is a collection of laws and social institutions that enforce the criminal law, while observing a series of clear procedural rules and restrictions. And Dignan, J. (2007) The procedure in the criminal system has already been stated as "starting only when crime is reported to the police" (page 2). When a crime occurs, the main content of the relevant criminal justice system is the law enforcement agency, otherwise it is the police. The police 's top priority is to investigate the crime and make an appropriate arrest. The power of the police is dominated by the states in which they are engaged and engaged. In the United States, criminal management and judicial administration are handled by the criminal justice system. The criminal justice system consists of three major and distinguishable elements of police, court, and disciplinary action. These components are also called subsystems. From this point of view, the components of the criminal justice system are considered to be interrelated, interdependent and working to achieve a unified goal. The prospect of this criminal trial tends to focus on how the incident flows in the system, causing a chain reaction when an incident is transferred from one component to another component. For example, the behavior of the street police affected the work of the court, and the decision of the judge of the court affected the operation of the prison and the prison. The police have a special place in the criminal justice system. It is said that the activities of the police authorities not only influence the function of the criminal justice system as a whole but also the police "gatekeeper". A very important decision on that position is that the most common decision most likely given by the police is to start a journey of suspicion of criminal trials through the maze of criminal justice in the United States "(Alpert and Dunham, 1997: 11 )

Juvenile crime prevention is a problem all Americans think. Various kinds of programs have been started to reduce juvenile delinquency. I found that the after school plan is effective. Over 28 million children or their parents' parents are working. The fact is that children who are left behind after school often do not go well and that they are likely to drop out of school due to those supervised after school. The fact also indicates that most juvenile crimes occur between 2 pm and 8 pm. In 1974, the Juvenile Judicial Crime Prevention Act was passed and it became an important milestone in the history of juvenile delinquency. Since the establishment of the Juvenile Court, this act was the most fundamental change in juvenile justice. The Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Act has five main points. First, it stipulates legalization to prevent status violators from being regarded as illegal. Second, it stipulates the institutionalization of juvenile correction so that only the most serious juvenile offenders are subject to imprisonment. In addition, the Act provides that status violators should not be institutionalized, and adult prison and juvenile boys should be separated by visual and auditory senses of adults. Third, we are expanding the use of change as an alternative to the formal handling of the Juvenile Court. Fourth, it continues to be applied to the minor's legal proceedings A detailed explanation of the juvenile justice process is outside the scope of this report. The Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Bureau briefly outlines the structure and process of the juvenile justice system and the process. Professor Michele Deitch has a more comprehensive overview of the history, standards, legislation, and contemporary issues of the juvenile justice system in China. National Correction Research Institute, "Quality Practice Desktop Guide for Cooperation with Young People in Prison" (2014). A

Justice Any action or decision we do is rational or irrational. Justice is usually determined by society or 'norm'. "Specification" will change according to society. But there are always broken laws, results to follow, penalties that must be given. Justice can be seen in two different ways: society and crime. Justice is in front of the audience. Because we have different attitudes towards good and evil. Criminal justice is a term that refers to the field of social law that a group of people thinks as valuable as the social daily mechanism functions. Judicial problems, judicial problems, criminal justice and punishment (sometimes called retaliatory justice), economic justice (often called distributed judicial judgment), fair state and government agencies, other spouses, parents and children, Relations among people, including social stratum, other social arrangements, international justice, and environmental justice. For example, in the field of economic justice, at least for the past 2,500 years, people have made intense debate about the proper distribution of wealth in society. Philosophers, political theorists, theologians, law scholars and others are trying to reveal the source, the nature and requirements of justice, various results. In many cases, legal theorists and philosophers are considering four different types of justice. Justice correction, justice distribution, procedural justice, and retaliation justice. Correcting justice is the responsibility to rectify the fraud aspect of a single person (as seen in modern contract law). Distribution Justice aims to properly distribute happiness and suffering between criminals and victims by punishing criminals. Procedural justice focuses on the fairness of procedures to punish violators. Justice of revenge may best be caught using the word lex talionis (the principle of "eye for the eyes"), which can be traced back to Exodus.

On 2 August 2016, the jury was reluctant to condemn the mentally disabled, or accredited him as guilty. So they did a third choice: guilty, but mentally ill. This is far from perfect On May 10, 2016, David Padilla adapted to the life in northeastern Philadelphia. After nearly 20 years imprisonment, he was treated for abuse last year and was sentenced to two life sentences from nonviolent drug crime. On February 10, 2016, according to law, Paul Cassell was sentenced to 54 years in imprisonment for Weldon Angelos on handling marijuana and possession of weapons. Mr. Kassel said the incident is one of the "most uneasy incidents" he is facing. On February 3, 2016, veteran Philadelphia prosecutor Robert Zauzmer served as an important priority in the last year of President Obama 's term of office. He told the NPR that he had seen numerous unjust decisions on low level criminals. On November 25, 2015, a bipartisan bill aimed at reforming the criminal justice system faced obstacles. The Ministry of Justice states that it can benefit senior management, which can prove that he is guilty On November 10, 2015, it was difficult to control the criminal justice system. It is even more difficult that no lawyer is present. However, the government said that it is still difficult for poor defendants to obtain proxy rights. On September 29, 2015, a group of Democratic and Republican senators had finalized a bill to revolutionize the justice system. This idea was supported by surprise supporters such as Koch Industries and ACLU. As of 25th August 2015, tribes of the Native American can not access the federal database, so we may try to take measures against crime. The Ministry of Justice wants to help How many times will the face of a person affect the sentence received at the court on July 17, 2015? According to a survey, people are asked to evaluate the credibility of murderers convicted based on their face photographs. An important function of the criminal justice system is to enforce the court's ruling when an individual is convicted. Juvenile justice is part of the criminal justice system dealing with young criminals. The main purpose of juvenile justice is to prevent young people from committing future crimes. Since deterrence is more important than punishment, the behavior of the juvenile justice system differs from that of the adult judicial system. There are various occupation options in the juvenile justice system. If you are interested in revision work, consider becoming a juvenile detainee, working in a youth training camp, or becoming a probation officer and parole. Arbitrators and arbitrators act as contacts between the courts and juvenile offenders and attempt to find alternatives for imprisonment under certain circumstances. In the United States, the justice system has two aspects for juvenile offenders and adults. The adult judicial system is known as the criminal justice system. This is a system whereby criminals are arrested, tried, declared and imprisoned. The juvenile justice system applies to children under the age of 18. The origin of the juvenile system dates back to 1925. For people pursuing criminal justice professionals and criminal justice degrees it is important to understand the differences between youth and the criminal justice system. The laws governing minors differ from country to country, but there are some things in common that may differ from the criminal system. In this article, I will study procedures in the criminal justice system. Before laying the foundation for this work, I will briefly introduce the contents of the criminal justice system. The criminal justice system is a collection of laws and social institutions that enforce the criminal law, while observing a series of clear procedural rules and restrictions. And Dignan, J. (2007) The procedure in the criminal system stated that "only when the crime is reported to the police" (p.2). When a crime occurs, the main content

Using the deadly power in the United States, the FBI will explain the most deadly force definition. But decide who will be able to use the deadly power of the police. When authorities think his / her life is a critical danger, fleeing must use deadly power. Under what circumstances it is reasonable to use fatal power. In this article, I will study the procedures in the criminal justice system. Before laying the foundation for this work, I will briefly introduce the contents of the criminal justice system. The criminal justice system is a collection of laws and social institutions that enforce the criminal law, while observing a series of clear procedural rules and restrictions. And Dignan, J. (2007) The procedure in the criminal system has already been stated as "starting only when crime is reported to the police" (page 2). When a crime occurs, the main content of the relevant criminal justice system is the law enforcement agency, otherwise it is the police. The police 's top priority is to investigate the crime and make an appropriate arrest. The power of the police is dominated by the states in which they are engaged and engaged. In the United States, criminal management and judicial administration are handled by the criminal justice system. The criminal justice system consists of three major and distinguishable elements of police, court, and disciplinary action. These components are also called subsystems. From this point of view, the components of the criminal justice system are considered to be interrelated, interdependent and working to achieve a unified goal. The prospect of this criminal trial tends to focus on how the incident flows in the system, causing a chain reaction when an incident is transferred from one component to another component. For example, the behavior of the street police affected the work of the court, and the decision of the judge of the court affected the operation of the prison and the prison.

Justice When asked "Can you live in the world of justice?" In fact, it asked us about everything. "Can anyone accomplish justice?" And "Can anyone be equal?" The answer to this question is no. Unfortunately, we live in a world where justice has never actually happened. The first justice I want to talk about is personal justice. Those who are not committing deadly crimes are blessed. Their life will be annoyed with resentment of anger, they are neither beautiful nor famous nor gifts of wealth. Judicial problems, judicial problems, criminal justice and punishment (sometimes called retaliatory justice), economic justice (often called distributed judicial judgment), fair state and government agencies, other spouses, parents and children, Relations among people, including social stratum, other social arrangements, international justice, and environmental justice. For example, in the field of economic justice, at least for the past 2,500 years, people have made intense debate about the proper distribution of wealth in society. Philosophers, political theorists, theologians, law scholars and others are trying to reveal the source, the nature and requirements of justice, various results. In many cases, legal theorists and philosophers are considering four different types of justice. Justice correction, justice distribution, procedural justice, and retaliation justice. Correcting justice is the responsibility to rectify the fraud aspect of a single person (as seen in modern contract law). Distribution Justice aims to properly distribute happiness and suffering between criminals and victims by punishing criminals. Procedural justice focuses on the fairness of procedures to punish violators. Justice of revenge may best be caught using the word lex talionis (the principle of "eye for the eyes"), which can be traced back to Exodus.

After responding to decades punitive 'fierce crimes' against juvenile delinquency and misconduct, the juvenile justice problem in the United States has dramatically changed in recent years. Policy makers are coming back slowly to the first principle of juvenile justice, recognizing that young people are still developing and should be given opportunities for treatment, rehabilitation and active strengthening. Through advocacy, legislation, and resource redistribution, most states succeeded in expanding alternative communities to prisons and prisons and significantly reduced the number of children in prisons. The American Civil Liberties Union is committed to challenging the criminalization and imprisonment of young people, especially those who are deprived of rights. We are promoting aggressive school discipline approach and trying to disassemble "pipe from school to jail". Rather than providing effective community service and support to young people and their families involved in the system, we will change laws and policies so that state and local jurisdictions can use Youth Prison and Prison carefully I am trying. Excessive punishment and the end of extreme punishment are extremely important to protect young people in the juvenile justice system. We will cooperate with domestic and domestic partners to end young people 's teenage life so that young people are not sentenced. We are also working on abolition of solitary confinement for juvenile inmates and adult detainees and for all youths in prison. Juvenile Justice: History and Philosophy, Juvenile Justice: Regional Therapy, Juvenile Judiciary: Facilities, Juvenile Juvenile, Adolescent Boys, Juvenile Crimes, Juvenile Violence, Police and Minors In case of a potential criminal, Crime Each style has subtle differences in proprietary format that changes over time and Encyclopedia.com warrants all references it generates, as not all information is available for each reference entry or article I can not do it. Therefore, we recommend that you use Encyclopedia.com's reference as a starting point before checking the styles and up-to-date information provided on these websites, according to school and publication requirements. The Florida Department of Juvenile Department of Justice (DJJ) plays an important role in the management of the Florida juvenile justice system and the court system. The mission of the Florida Juvenile Department of Justice (DJJ) is to "strengthen public safety through effective prevention, intervention and treatment services to reduce juvenile delinquency These services strengthen families, I can reverse the lives of a certain young man. " The central court held a detention trial within 24 hours after the arrest. It is usually held in the morning after being arrested. The judge will decide whether to release the accused, if so, what conditions are needed to protect the victim. A judge may order the accused to "not touch" the victim or witness. If the judge does not release the accused, he or she can stay in the detention center for up to 21 days.

Juvenile justice offenses are generally decreasing, but certain criminal groups and criminal groups are actually increasing. Certain crimes such as hatred crime are discussions that increase color, belief, gender or sexual orientation, the crime committed by the victim as a hostile member of the group, and juvenile delinquency. A 12 - year - old boy Lionel Tate was subject to investigation when he was acting. Using his case, I will discuss increasing juvenile delinquency, contribution to malicious behavior, seriousness of youth crime, and possible but reasonable impact. Juvenile Justice: History and Philosophy, Juvenile Justice: Regional Therapy, Juvenile Judiciary: Facilities, Juvenile Justice: Juvenile Trial, Adult Crime, Juvenile Crime, Juvenile Crime, Police In the case of a potential criminal, each style of school and crime Encyclopedia.com can not guarantee all references it generates because there are subtle differences in the evolving proprietary format and not all information about all reference entries or articles is available. Therefore, we recommend that you use Encyclopedia.com citation as a starting point before checking the styles based on school and publication requirements and the latest information provided on these sites. Florida Juvenile Department of Justice (DJJ) plays an important role in the management of the Florida juvenile justice system and the court system. The mission of the Florida Juvenile Department of Justice (DJJ) is to "strengthen public safety through effective prevention, intervention, treatment services to reduce juvenile delinquency These services strengthen families, I can reverse the lives of a certain young man. " The central court tried detention within 24 hours after the arrest. It is usually held in the morning after being arrested. The judge will decide whether to release the accused, if so, what conditions are necessary to protect the victim. The judge may order the accused to "do not contact" with the victim or witness. If the judge does not release the accused, he or she can stay in the detention center for up to 21 days. Florida's criminal justice system handles children and adolesdifferently from adults. If your child is accused of juvenile crime, he or she will enter the Florida Juvenile justice system. The Juvenile Justice Department (DJJ) is focusing on the punishment of the above rehabilitation. Read on to learn the overview of the juvenile justice process. If a child or a young man is arrested for a crime, she will be sent to the Youth Evaluation Center where a reservation will be made and a fingerprint will be attached. She is awarded the detention risk assessment tool (DRAI) which provides a standardized way to judge whether detention is necessary or not. If she does not need to be detained, she will be released to the parent or guardian, but she will be sent to the juvenile detention center (JDC) if the DRAI indicates that detention is necessary.

Minorities and justice TV shows such as Dateline, 60 minutes, 20/20 broadcast the discriminatory part of the judicial system, document police actions against minorities through hidden cameras, suffer from condemnation or abuse I will do interviews with ethnic minorities. And, referring to the death penalty statistics, it seems that it is particularly biased by black people. The judicial archive created several careers about minorities who were subject to some atrocities in the US justice system. CRJ 432 Minorities and justice 3 Sem. It's time. This course outlines and explains the themes and problems surrounding the relationship between minority groups and US law. Ethnic and ethnic problems in the criminal justice system will be reviewed from a historical point of view. Emphasis is placed on the importance of consciousness and understanding of different cultures. Exploring the relationship between the criminal justice system and minorities, and the relationships of openness, institution, subtle racial discrimination and discrimination. Precondition: PLSC 334 Iowa State Detective and Juvenile Justice Program Agency. Explanation and discussion of excessive representatives of minority groups in the Iowa Juvenile Justice System. Washington DC: US ​​Department of Justice, US Justice and Crime Prevention Bureau, 1993. The Iowa Juvenile Judicial Advisory Committee studied ways to reduce excessive representation of minority youth in the National Juvenile Juvenile Justice System. Kaplan, S.G. And J. Bussner. "Memorandum on the Acceptance of Racial Prejudice against Children and Adolescents in New York's National Mental Health Facilities and Correctional Facilities". 149, No. 6 (June 1992), pp. 768-772. In this survey we investigated whether there are too many representatives of youth correctional institutions when black children and young people are under-represented in New York State mental health facilities and when the population ethnic distribution is controlled. In almost all the state 's juvenile justice system, minority youth representatives are disproportionate. If underage young people are exposed to white youth rather than white teenagers, minority links in juvenile justice are unbalanced. African Americans, Hispanics, Asians, Pacific Islanders and Native Americans account for one-third of American youth. However, they account for over two-thirds of young people in safe youth facilities. Young people's ethnic minority experience in the juvenile justice system is quite different from whites' youth experience. Following the custody of an excessive number of ethnic minorities, Congress modified the juvenile justice crime prevention law and obliged the state to formulate action plans to address imbalance investigations and issues. In this carefully edited book, the authors pointed out the scope and basis of various treatments for young people in juvenile justice, and identified the need to deal with this prejudice. As a result of research and provocative analysis of topics such as police, city juvenile criminal courts, imprisonment and penalties, and racial differences among juvenile justice groups, readers have come to understand the various racial prejudices within the system It was. The author also provides creative and practical policy advice and strategies to overcome the racial inequality in the juvenile justice process.

Criminal justice crimes and community justice crimes are defined as acts or omissions that are punished by law. There are many ways to deal with crime. First of all, our current system is criminal justice. This system, also called retaliatory justice, is more illegal than anything else. Another system that many people think is superior is the community justice or recovery approach. The restoration approach is more victim oriented. There is controversy as to which system should be used to deal with crime. 1 Eleanor · Hannon · Judas and Michael · Bryant, Criminal Justice: Punishment and Reconstruction, Criminal Justice: Reconsidering VS. Reconstruction 1, 1 (2004) Reconsidering the concept of retaliation, "given in repayment, especially punishment Root "2 Id. 2 ("The criminal justice system is definitely in danger, currently 2 million people are imprisoned in the US." The modern restorative justice practice is relatively new Recovery Justice and Retaliatory Justice: Exploring opportunities for cooperation or conflict of justice Donald · H · J · Hermann Introduction of Criminal Justice Criminal justice is a broad subject and labor force. At the moment, the United States and the world need more criminal justice than ever before. The criminal justice system is increasingly improved throughout the history by changing the purpose of law enforcement officials and the people they accept orders. The purpose of this analysis is to break the theme of the three criminal justices, the juvenile justice system, the prison life and the prison. In the United States, the justice system has two aspects for juvenile offenders and adults. The adult judicial system is known as the criminal justice system. This is a system whereby criminals are arrested, tried, declared and imprisoned. The juvenile justice system applies to children under the age of 18. The origin of the juvenile system existed as early as 1925. For those who are pursuing criminal justice professions and criminal justice degrees, it is important to understand the differences between adolescence and the criminal justice system. The laws that govern minors vary from country to country, but there are some things that are generally different from the criminal system.

Privileges and justice privileges are like beautiful gifts of various shapes and sizes. The value of privilege depends on who the recipient is. Luxury privileges given to the rich may not be as important as the health insurance privileges of the people of the low income bracket. In our world today, privileges are spread in various forms and in different social classes. But privilege seems to benefit rich as they seem to push from their own group. Market justice is also seen as a form of justice in care (Drevdahl, 2002). It is based on respecting the rights of those who receive these privileges. As long as these inequalities are derived from a fair market system, market justice will tolerate inequality. In other words, only people who have the right to acquire rights in the market system. People without rights are not security privileges. Market justice Agenda's critics point out that the use of the term market as an adjective of justice is a contradiction itself (Beauchamp, 1986). Justice is the term that is most commonly used to discuss impartiality, impartiality, or the process of deliberation. The term market is usually related to the balance between monetary value and product distribution. When discussing fairness, these two words are contradictory. Even if we apply the word "justice" to "market" simply, this concept does not enter the area of ​​justice (Drevdahl et al., 2001, p. 24). When I attended college, I attended a social justice seminar. Meanwhile, we usually did what we call "privileged walking". Privileged walking has become a social justice activity, and in my opinion Buzzfeed did it. For those who have never participated, there are several necessary elements. "If you are raised by two parents, you can move forward one step" or "If you want to know where the next meal comes from, step back." "If you think you are willing to let partners openly participate, please move one step further." "If someone accuses you are using the wrong bathroom, please step back one step. " Many people say white people 's privileges are paralyzed in the criminal justice system. Please correct it. The white privilege is the criminal justice system. A recent incident, including privileged college students convicted of sexual assault with his father, was one of the reasons many white men benefited from committing bad crimes. In a survey conducted by the judgment project (pdf) in 2015, we found that judges are more likely to become longer-colored people than white people, even when there are few criminal records. Also, in many cases, a young probation officer also revealed that the crime committed by the Caucasian is considered a temporary misjudgment or a bad environment. For African Americans, the cause of the crime is thought to be related to bad attitudes and personality.

The existence of human beings occurs in social institutions, communication and cooperation among people is a necessary condition for coexistence. The advantage of participating in these agencies is either economic, social emotional, or a combination of the two. Economic benefits provide a means of obtaining material products and comfort, social emotional benefits provide individuals with the status and value of the group. How these benefits are distributed in society is extremely important to individuals (Schminke, Ambrose, & Noel, 1997). Organizational justice refers to "fairness and ethical handling of individuals within an organization". Organizational justice is a term commonly used by organization psychologists and refers to the way an organization handles employees fairly and fairly. " The dictionary defines "justice" as "popular Oxford New Age elementary school dictionary". However, in everyday life the term justice is used to mean "should" or "justice". In organizational science research, justice is considered to be built socially. In other words, actions are considered to be cognitive behaviors of individuals based on empirical research. In the context of human resources management, organizational justice is a recently developed concept, but it is widely used to organize the research and management framework. In this regard, organizational justice can be defined as the extent to which an employee of a particular company views the organization's events as being fair or unfair. This means that employee perception of the organization's processes, policies, and instructions is contrary to the organization's own perception and constitutes the organization's justice (Redman and Wilkinson 2001). Some of the employees may think that they are unfair to them while developing a policy that the company considers reasonable, and therefore regarding the performance, output, and productivity of each employee It is necessary to negotiate the "unfair" problem. And discussion. Organizational justice refers to the recognition of the fairness of employees and history has historically started with Adams' work on the theory of fairness. The theory of impartiality is the historical root of organizational justice. According to Adams, if things do not proceed as intended, people suffer cognitive dissonance. It predicts individuals to be moved by the sense of fairness. The theory states that men and women are in a state of continuous and endless social comparison with alleged individual groups. The traditional theory of Adams assumes that the reaction to injustice is formally more dynamic and it is necessary to reduce the degree of pain and discordance caused by inequality. In the literature on systematic justice, judicial judgment is based on assessment of treatment by authorities or decision makers, and fellow action does not affect discourse. This suggests that only top-down collapse may cause an unfair view of the interaction (Pearson et al., 2000, 2001). Overall, organization theory supports the concept of undeveloped stimuli from above, that is, the individual from a higher position may lead to perception of inaccuracy of the interaction.

Kraska (2004) emphasizes criminal justice as a theoretical viewpoint of social construction. To understand the violation, we must define ways of action as illegal and study ways to investigate the correspondence of the criminal justice system. "This is not the quality of the action that the person himself committed, but the result of the rule and sanction imposed on the offender by others" (Kraska, 2004). There are criminal justice authorities that affect the definition of criminal acts. In other words, police depict the idea of ​​healing crime, criminal statistics and impossible work of the work organization. In this article, I will study the procedures in the criminal justice system. Before laying the foundation for this work, I will briefly introduce the contents of the criminal justice system. The criminal justice system is a collection of laws and social institutions that enforce the criminal law, while observing a series of clear procedural rules and restrictions. And Dignan, J. (2007) The procedure in the criminal system has already been stated as "starting only when crime is reported to the police" (page 2). When a crime occurs, the main content of the relevant criminal justice system is the law enforcement agency, otherwise it is the police. The police 's top priority is to investigate the crime and make an appropriate arrest. The power of the police is dominated by the states in which they are engaged and engaged. In the United States, criminal management and judicial administration are handled by the criminal justice system. The criminal justice system consists of three major and distinguishable elements of police, court, and disciplinary action. These components are also called subsystems. From this point of view, the components of the criminal justice system are considered to be interrelated, interdependent and working to achieve a unified goal. The prospect of this criminal trial tends to focus on how the incident flows in the system, causing a chain reaction when an incident is transferred from one component to another component. For example, the behavior of the street police affected the work of the court, and the decision of the judge of the court affected the operation of the prison and the prison. The police occupy a special position in the criminal justice system. Act of the executive officers of the law affects the function of the entire criminal justice system, and only affects the police and does not say the "gatekeeper" of the system: "In many cases, these people's condemnation perpetrator It is the first contact and what happens to make what the position of some very important decisions is to decide to make the most of the police ...... in the American criminal justice Journey of criminal suspected maze "(Alpert and Danham, 1997: 11)

Minors under the age of 18 or young people accused of criminal action are usually handled through the Juvenile justice system 1. It is similar to the adult criminal justice system in many respects - it includes arrest, detention, petition, hearing, award, disposition, disposition, probation and re-entry - the juvenile justice process is fundamentally different among young people It is based on prerequisites. Regardless of the level of responsibility or the level of rehabilitation, adults. In addition to maintaining public safety, the main purpose of the juvenile justice system is skill development, adaptation to training, dealing with rehabilitation, treatment needs, and successful reintegration of youth to the community. ¿ Understand the history of juvenile justice in the United States - Understand the contemporary issues of juvenile justice networks - Discuss conflicts between informal and proper procedures in juvenile justice - Understand the difference between ideal and real juvenile justice networks American boys' judicial network in controversy Even if you grow up please participate (see Exercise 1.1). Even after more than a century since the establishment of the first family court in Illinois (1899), the discussion on the goals to be achieved and the procedures used in the network continues, and between the theory and practice quite There is a gap. At the same time, concerns about general crime, especially violent crime continue to rise, but trust in the juvenile justice network continues to decline. The Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Bureau (OJJDP) presents a series of juvenile judicial practices that provide the latest research, promising practices and tools in the field of juvenile justice. These security information are important to youth service experts involved in the development and recruitment of juvenile judicial policies and programs, regardless of funding sources. Court officials need to balance the public safety interests with the needs of young people in determining the procedure and the scope of the necessary restrictions to arrange juvenile offenders. Juvenile offenders who committed serious and / or violent crimes may need to be imprisoned to strengthen supervision and intervention to preserve public safety and to restore them. On the other hand, many criminals can effectively recover through community-based supervision and intervention. Alternative idea of ​​juvenile offender's safe detention and imprisonment James Austin, Kelly Dedel Johnson, and Ronald Weitzer Juvenile Justice: History and Philosophy, Juvenile Justice: Regional Therapy, Juvenile Judiciary: Facilities, Juvenile Juvenile, Adolescent Boys, Juvenile Crimes, Juvenile Violence, Police and Minors In case of a potential criminal, Crime Each style has subtle differences in proprietary format that changes over time and Encyclopedia.com warrants all references it generates, as not all information is available for each reference entry or article I can not do it. Therefore, we recommend that you use Encyclopedia.com's reference as a starting point before checking the styles and up-to-date information provided on these websites, according to school and publication requirements.

Justice is part of revenge, revenge is also part of justice. "Justice" comes from Latin "correct, fair, equality". This is the quality of justice and loyalty to the country, but it is helpful for strong profit (Hourani, 1962). Or wrong. What will happen to individuals who have experienced unfair behavior leads to the quest for one of these two, justice or revenge. What are the main differences between them? There are some important differences between revenge and justice. Revenge is mainly emotional, justice is mainly rational. Revenge is usually for balance, justice is usually to correct mistakes. Revenge is usually personal, but justice is non-personal and fair. Revenge is retributive and retributive. Justice is regaining balance. Revenge represents anger, hatred, malice, and is used as a reward for what they did. Justice is not to hurt anyone. Revenge is used as a weapon to hurt someone to gain sword, equality, but justice is used as a shield to protect yourself and others. Whenever a man is treated illegitimate, he will seek justice or revenge. Many people think that the two terms of justice and revenge have the same meaning, but they have two different meanings. Justice is the process of law that gives criminals fair judgment and punishment. Revenge is an act of hurting or hurting someone, it is punishment for what they do. The main difference between justice and revenge lies in their goal; justice aims to rectify mistakes, and revenge is only to achieve balance. Justice is fair treatment and action. More specifically, it means the process or outcome of fair use of the law to judge and punish crimes and offenders. Justice is always associated with moral integrity, equality, fairness and morality. If you are a victim of a specific misconduct you ask for justice. For example, if you are injured by being hit by a person, you will seek justice from the law. The police investigated the case and the court filed a lawsuit against the offender Vengeance is a form of justice that was enacted within the lack of formal legal and legal norms or contempt. In most cases retaliation is defined as taking harmful actions against individuals or groups in response to complaints, whether genuine or perceptive. It is used to punish mistakes by getting out of the law. Francis Bacon stated revenge as "savage justice" and "I really offended the law to eliminate the law". Primitive justice and retaliatory justice are often distinguished from more formal and detailed forms of justice such as distributed justice and sacred judgment.

The word "justice" to make justice for everyone is a difficult language to define. Through some definitions, we can find the word "justice" to explain the word justice. It just means fairness, after all we can say that justice is fair or right. Remember this definition when reading Agamemnon and The Libation Bearers and you believe that the characters in both plays are in their own hands and they are doing "right" things You can see. According to the ancient law of goddess of revenge, they claimed that blood should be compensated with blood and infinite disaster. McDowell: I do not think we even heard what we said, as we often say. The country under God is indivisible and has freedom and justice for all. Justice for all people means economic, social and criminal justice. This is what the Democratic Party of Japan is representing, it is in everyone. McDowell: I think it depends on what happens at that time. First of all, I do not know if it happened before the 2018 election. If he is somewhat elastic that we can weaken the structure and texture of our government and our lifestyle, that is definitely it. I think that the happiness of this country comes from all kinds of party game skills. Post-conflict society such as northern Uganda, southern Sudan, Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) faces challenges of sustainable peace and justice. While some seek justice at every sacrifice to avoid promoting immunity, the rest of society forgets past terrorism and trauma, and likes to remain hopeful and confident. It is very difficult to balance the two. Justice cards, of course, represent justice and, more seriously, the idea that they get what they deserve. "Your decision and action will have a long-term impact, your current and future situation is likely to be the result of these decisions and actions." Professor Tarot, who is reading a book, It suggests a reader of the preface. "Do not panic right now ..." In fact, Deathcard symbolizes the moment of change with one door closed and the other door open. This is a very positive thing, there is a possibility of updating and a new start time. Sometimes cards symbolize death

Young people in the Canadian justice system lost their identity. Their age is under the jurisdiction of the juvenile criminal justice law. Criminal charges call them criminals and their "qualities" ... label society [1957: 45]. Programs like pre-judged reports contain their history and reduce adolescence to "more or less easily absorbed" (1957: 45). The pre - judgment report prepared by the probation officer instructs the judge at the time of the judgment. The Juvenile Criminal Justice Act (YCJA, French: Loisurlestysèmedejustice pénalepourlesteen) (the same Act) is a Canadian law that came into effect on April 1, 2003. This includes the prosecution of juvenile criminal offenses. This bill is an alternative to the juvenile crime law, which replaces the juvenile crime law. The law stipulates that criminal and orthodox law applies to people over the age of 12, but at the time of crime it is under 18 years of age (YCJA section 2). As described later in the law, young people between the ages of 14 and 17 may be declared to adult under certain conditions. Article 13 of the Penal Code stipulates that "people under the age of 12 must not be convicted by their actions or omissions." This brief guide of the Juvenile Criminal Justice Act (YCJA) outlines a section-by-section review of Canadian youth criminal justice system, legal and business impact, and documents recent trends recently. This is essential for those who need to trade with young people and understand how YCJA is being implemented. For over 100 years, Canada has established a separate criminal justice system for young people. The starting point for the juvenile criminal justice law is that young people should be responsible for their actions, but they are still young men making mistakes, mature, learn from their mistakes, accept the results of action , There should be opportunities to bring about change. Therefore, they should undergo different treatments than adults who understand their treatment and are expected to be fully responsible for their behavior.

Law enforcement system including police, lawyers, courts and disciplinary measures Introducing Criminal Justice Criminal justice is a broad subject and labor force. At the present time, the United States and the world need more criminal justice than ever. The criminal justice system has been improved throughout the history by changing the purpose of people who accept law enforcement officials and orders. The purpose of this analysis is to break the theme of three criminal justices: juvenile justice system, prison life and prison. In the United States, the justice system has two aspects for juvenile offenders and adults. The adult judicial system is known as the criminal justice system. This is a system whereby criminals are arrested, tried, declared and imprisoned. The juvenile justice system applies to children under the age of 18. The origin of the juvenile system dates back to 1925. For people pursuing criminal justice professionals and criminal justice degrees it is important to understand the differences between youth and the criminal justice system. The laws governing minors differ from country to country, but there are some things in common that may differ from the criminal system. An important function of the criminal justice system is to enforce the court's ruling when an individual is convicted. Juvenile justice is part of the criminal justice system dealing with young criminals. The main purpose of juvenile justice is to prevent young people from committing future crimes. Since deterrence is more important than punishment, the behavior of the juvenile justice system differs from that of the adult judicial system. There are various occupation options in the juvenile justice system. If you are interested in revision work, consider becoming a juvenile detainee, working in a youth training camp, or becoming a probation officer and parole. Arbitrators and arbitrators act as contacts between the courts and juvenile offenders and attempt to find alternatives for imprisonment under certain circumstances.

American Justice is a criminal justice television program in the United States that is broadcasted on the A & E network organized by Bill Curtis. This program includes interesting or remarkable examples such as the story of Selena's murder, Scarsdale diet doctor's killing, Hillside Stranglers, Matthew Shepard, Wells Fargo robbery, police, lawyers, victims and other key figures . The assailant himself. I made more than 250 episodes and became the longest cable television documentary so far The US Criminal Justice System Course examines criminal justice decision, police, criminal law, court, jail and juvenile justice system. This course, as well as the effectiveness of criminal justice policy in modern American criminal justice system, is designed to introduce these broad subject areas to students and explore equality and treatment problems. American society is deepening the understanding and understanding of students' implicit and explicit prejudice against different cultures, race, ethnicity, nationality, age, sex, economic status, sexual orientation, and disability. Students learn how these concepts relate to communication, attitudes and behavior within the criminal justice system, and the effectiveness of interaction between law enforcement agencies and criminal justice courts and people with different backgrounds I will improve sex. The components of the criminal justice system include the police, the court system and the correctional institution. Describe the definitions, functions, and examples of each component of the US criminal justice system. Detailed criminal proceedings and criminal proceedings will also be explained. The criminal justice system is part of the criminal justice system and consists of three main elements. These elements are policies, courts and corrections. Each component is defined according to the US criminal justice system. The main functions of each component are also determined, and two examples of each component are given. Ultimate ... Read more

Critical Review Justice "Survey" "Simple Justice" was written by Richard Kruger and reviewed the history of Brown v. Board of Education, the Supreme Court's decision to ban apartheid, and the pre-century legal equality struggle in Africa and the United States did. It begins with unfairness of slavery, the integration of schools into society, and the legal basis affecting African Americans. This story reveals that hatred has resulted in depreciation of American African Americans over 300 years. It does not deny Brown's contribution to ending the evil system of American legal isolation and racial oppression. Richard Kruger, author of Simple Justice, points out as follows. "The Supreme Court tried to limit the words of Brown to the isolation of public schools." Until 1954, the doctrine of "separation but equality" that was included in the case of Pressy v. Ferguson defined domestic norms. In the south, racial oppression is cruel, endorsed by the legal system and can be traced back to our country's slave era. In the north, de facto separation and secret discrimination are common. Blacks should stay in their "place" everywhere. Briefly, Richard Kruger wrote on the day before Brown v. Board of Education, "Black people do not yet know their rights yet." People make better in economics and education - so in the white community they become fickle, do not run the risk of monetary revenge or run the risk of violence. (3) The situation in Gadsden County is different. Linda and Jewell Dixie's father Dixie are a good example. A.I. Dixie was a day worker at the Gadsden County Tobacco Plantation in the 1930s but tried to organize colleagues to face cruel working conditions. When this effort collapsed in 1936, he carried out armed self-defense to prevent the white coach from whipping him. (Four) Garnet talked to more and more African Americans. The universal desire for simple justice and human revenge calls for brutal revenge for slave owner's abuse. Nevertheless, care should be taken with caution. However, "legitimate" aggressive manhood seems to be attractive, "Most black people understand the danger of relatively helpless slavery and the consequences of slave rebellion", that is, white people's Large-scale retaliation. He asserts a good battle, but "It does not encourage revolution, your number is too small." 23 He led foolishness trying to free blacks by all means to their bold slaughter It was.

Juvenile justice is the field of criminal law applied to people under age sufficient to be in charge of criminal activity. In most states, the age of crime is set at 18 years old. The juvenile law mainly complies with the state law, and juvenile law is enacted in most provinces. The main purpose of the juvenile justice system is not punishment but rehabilitation. If the juvenile court abandoned or abandoned its jurisdiction, the juvenile may be transferred to the adult court. Domestic law, which creates a juvenile court and provides a way to deal with juvenile delinquency, is generally maintained by the court as an acceptable extension of the authority of the state police to ensure the safety and well-being of children. The doctrine of Parens patriae approves domestic laws to protect, care for, maintain and maintain children within their jurisdiction The Federation's role in this area is primarily funders and standard setters. Congress passed the juvenile crime prevention management law in 1968. It was later revised in 1972 and renamed the law on prevention of juvenile delinquency. The purpose of this law is to provide regional prevention services to youngsters at default risk, to assist in training individuals providing such services, and to provide technical assistance in this area . The Federal Juvenile Offenses Act stipulates juvenile delinquency (other criminal laws, however, those committed by those under the age of 18) and that state laws must comply with juvenile court procedures and penalties. Through the passage of the Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Act (JJDP Act) in 1974, the federal government started the process of juvenile justice reform, but the real impact on the girls involved in juvenile justice depends on the reapproval of the JJDP Act in 1992 started. 121 In this re-approval, minor criminal issues such as "reasons for prevention and treatment of underage salvation for specific service / school prison - folder / summary report / suspended education - California / SuspendedEd" It is necessary to evaluate. 118 WATSON & EDELMAN, Note 2 above, p. 33.119 Morris, note 55 above (which is shown in the hatred of feminist and racist speech). 120 "Juvenile justice and illegal protection law", 42 USC. § 5601 (1974). 121 42 USC. § 5601 - 5681 (2006) Girl Court: Sex-sensitive juvenile court replaces Wendy S. Heipt CAIR project / Girls Union Justice Juvenile Justice: History and Philosophy, Juvenile Justice: Regional Therapy, Juvenile Judiciary: Facilities, Juvenile Juvenile, Adolescent Boys, Juvenile Crimes, Juvenile Violence, Police and Minors In case of a potential criminal, Crime Each style has subtle differences in proprietary format that changes over time and Encyclopedia.com warrants all references it generates, as not all information is available for each reference entry or article I can not do it. Therefore, we recommend that you use Encyclopedia.com's reference as a starting point before checking the styles and up-to-date information provided on these websites, according to school and publication requirements. The Florida Department of Juvenile Department of Justice (DJJ) plays an important role in the management of the Florida juvenile justice system and the court system. The mission of the Florida Juvenile Department of Justice (DJJ) is to "strengthen public safety through effective prevention, intervention and treatment services to reduce juvenile delinquency These services strengthen families, I can reverse the lives of a certain young man. " The central court held a detention trial within 24 hours after the arrest. It is usually held in the morning after being arrested. The judge will decide whether to release the accused, if so, what conditions are needed to protect the victim. A judge may order the accused to "not touch" the victim or witness. If the judge does not release the accused, he or she can stay in the detention center for up to 21 days.

The concept of justice is recognized and misunderstood at the same time worldwide. The Oxford English Dictionary defines justice as "quality of existence (moral) justice or justice." Because of such a short definition it is impossible to infer that the word justice is superficial. On the contrary, this ancient word may start with a clear meaning, but it has developed greatly based on its existence. The evolution of civilization in turn made the word evolve. For the evolving civilization, the current judicial situation has been lost and it is important to review its characteristics. Restorative justice is a widely misunderstood concept. Information that is open to the public is limited. It does not matter how it works or how it works. Unfortunately, the information people frequently interact with is often misunderstood. If there are no other reasons, it is not because it is part of our "Criminal Law", understand what the restorative justice is and how it functions in the Canadian justice system It is important to do. Restorative justice is the law, its ignorance is also harmful. In addition, there is evidence that the use of restorative justice can reduce the likelihood that a criminal commits another crime (Elizabeth Elliott, Restorative Trial (Burnaby, Simon Fraser University for the Criminology, 2013), 82 ). According to the survey, by encouraging criminals to take responsibility for their behavior, compensating for these behaviors and learning from the whole process can reduce recidivism. Restorative justice is more than just a victim - mediation of criminals. It is not a program or process. This is a different paradigm or reference framework for our understanding of crime and justice. Other restorative judicial responses to crime include family group meetings, community judgments, neighborhood accountability committees, compensation grace, compensation plans, and community service plans. The relationship between victim rights advocates and increasingly recovering justice / victims - criminal mediation exercises has been disturbing for years. Early victims - When the plan of the perpetrators was too persuasive and even essential, the victims' supporters objected to a great deal (and this is correct!) They are a sincere participation of the victims I worked hard in order to get. The victim support program works in collaboration with the victim - criminal intermediary program to teach the mediator how to tackle the victim more sensitively and respectfully. Learning of the victim is a study of the victim. This includes the relationship between the criminal and the victim, and the role of the victim in the criminal justice system. Victims are also studying ways to portray victims in the media to understand the short-term and long-term impact of crime. In the learning of the victim, the victim is a person who is harmed by the perpetrator. The perpetrator or perpetrator is the individual who committed the crime. Criminal justice experts are trying to solve crime and understand criminals' thinking in rehabilitating criminals, but legal institutions are also used to understand the reasons for targeting victims .

Juvenile Justice You will be sentenced to 10 years old for imprisonment for decades. Juvenile offenders commit a crime and the judicial system treats more serious incidents as adults. Juvenile offenders should not be judged as adults. Because children are not the same as adults, they should not be regarded as adults. Some children do not know what is wrong. Some people may not know the seriousness and influence of what they are doing. Children are different from adults. Their body and mind are still evolving and developing. In the United States, the justice system has two aspects for juvenile offenders and adults. The adult judicial system is known as the criminal justice system. This is a system whereby criminals are arrested, tried, declared and imprisoned. The juvenile justice system applies to children under the age of 18. The origin of the juvenile system existed as early as 1925. For those who are pursuing criminal justice professions and criminal justice degrees, it is important to understand the differences between adolescence and the criminal justice system. The laws that govern minors vary from country to country, but there are some things that are generally different from the criminal system. An important function of the criminal justice system is to enforce the judgment of the court when an individual is convicted. Juvenile justice is a division of the criminal justice system dealing with young criminals. The main purpose of juvenile justice is to prevent minors from committing future crimes. Because the emphasis is on deterrence rather than punishment, the juvenile justice system operates differently from the adult judicial system. There are various occupation options in the juvenile justice system. If you are interested in revision work, consider becoming a juvenile detainee, working at a youth training camp, or becoming a probation officer and parole. Arbitrators and arbitrators act as contacts between the courts and juvenile offenders and attempt to find alternatives for imprisonment under certain circumstances. The juvenile justice system and the criminal justice system have similarities and differences. The juvenile justice system deals with cases of people under 18 years of age. As a result, lawsuits including those under the age of 18 are usually trialed at juvenile training schools, but there are exceptions to this principle. Criminal justice system is usually suspected of crime and applies to people over the age of 18. In the juvenile justice system, one goal is to rehabilitate the accused and those convicted. Normally, judges can consider selecting more sentences. These choices may make it impossible for teenagers to go to prisons, but make it impossible to provide counseling and community service options. Juvenile offenders are usually attempted criminal acts, not criminal acts. They have no right to a jury trial. The judge will hear the case and will ruling. Juvenile courts are not as officially as ordinary adult courts List the differences and similarities between the juvenile justice system and the criminal justice system. Generally, are they more similar or different?

What is social justice and how does it relate to liberation theology? How sin, love, grace, and human freedom influence social justice. What restricts freedom and social justice How do all these work in the kingdom of God? Social justice is a social concept that everyone is treated fairly and is not subject to discrimination based on economic status, race, gender, ethnicity, Grace is a gift from God and we are not fit. In our name, social justice is a common theme linking materials of solutions of all social justice, but what is the real meaning behind these words? What is the true definition of social justice? Wikipedia believes that "social justice" comes from religious terms that recognize the collective nature of human beings and our personal commitment to helping others, but here are some common There is a definition. Socially fair society is defined as a principle based on equality and solidarity by its supporters and practitioners, and this pedagogy also believes that a socially fair society understands. And emphasize human rights, recognize everyone's dignity. - Wikipedia Many people will understand the term I'm using - the Millennium social justice defender - as a synonym for the contempt 'social justice fighter'. This is the term used to trigger the weakness of overuse, but it indicates an important problem. In a typical demonstration of a dazzling horseshoe style theory, the special brand of sustainable supporters of this millennium distorted the splendid cause of social, economic and political equality to social authoritarian movements. Isolated ideological academic theory based on division and inhumanization The modern social justice movement was published on Twitter, Tumblr, Facebook, Jezebel, Slate, Huffington Post etc Reminiscent of red panic over civil rights movement (choose one)

The authors of the Declaration of Independence explained the bold vision of the United States, that is, the country over which all people are equal. Two hundred years later, it has not been realized yet. A couple of generations of civil rights activities in legal, political, social, employment, educational and other areas have made remarkable progress, but indigenous people forced evictions and African slavery is a system of racial injustice The beginning of. Our country is not free. In our public schools, colorful people restrict themselves to apartheid, insufficient funds, inferior procedures, criminal justice system, imprisonment of people of color, making poverty criminal, absolute isolation It has been. In the housing industry, equal justice is still elusive. In order to realize a world without discrimination, the racial trial program filed a lawsuit in the state and federal courts across the country, accepting lawsuits that have significant and widespread impact on colorful people. In partnership with state-owned ACLU affiliates, other civil rights groups, and local supporters, we lobby and support the grassroots movement in rural and provincial legislatures. Through these efforts, we educate the citizens about various issues and empower the public, including race, positive behavior, and rights of the American Indians, related to criminal justice, economic justice and educational inequality I strive to give. Racial justice is an important issue for all Americans. As a Democrat, we should lead our commitment to racial justice by listening to people in our color. It is necessary to always know that racial justice covers all fields of sex, class, geography and gender identity. We need to concentrate on everything, such as employment, criminal justice reform, closing of private prisons, promotion of diversification of business, residence. As a vice president I would like to cooperate closely to promote racial justice within the Democratic Party. We should always remind everyone that # sayhername # blacklivesmatter Until a while ago, I was asked to be a member of the group. My role is to talk about white racial discrimination. When it became my talk number, I used a kind of racial justice similar to "slope", and we suggested that we have a highway like a race. Part of the information is how much I appreciate it, and although many of us are in different lanes, we are moving in the same direction. What I am trying to say is that as many people as possible are needed to do our best in our local environment on this road. Conservative, progressive, radical and calm. Everyone can play a role in our community; everyone can play some role. As everyone has an influential local career, we are all conditions necessary for struggle. The main motivation of this analogy of my Race Justice Highway exploration is to support other people who are on this journey through its various lanes, especially those just joining the job. I hope that we will show each other's efforts more than ever. Since it often seems that there is a lack of recognition among each other (between white racists and other social justice groups), this is a group liberation trip that avoids racial discrimination Suggesting that Caucasians engaged in prevention activities may follow. Necessary traffic congestion and accidents will benefit all people in the background. (Note: This metaphor focuses on the Caucasian racial prevention channel, so I will leave it to colored people to define my lanes and extend them to meanings in a meaningful way to them. )

Juvenile justice: Building In today's society, teenagers are tried in an adult court for the death penalty and are sent to prison. A 14 - year - old child accused for murder or rape charges will automatically be adults tried. If children aged 6 and 7 who were tried in an adult court are obliged to serve in adult prison, they are subject to sexual violence and are more likely to become repeat offenders. Judge's discretion in judging the fate of accused offenders (serious, violent or otherwise) Juvenile Justice: History and Philosophy, Juvenile Justice: Regional Therapy, Juvenile Judiciary: Facilities, Juvenile Justice: Juvenile Trial, Adult Crime, Juvenile Crime, Juvenile Crime, Police In the case of a potential criminal, each style of school and crime Encyclopedia.com can not guarantee all references it generates because there are subtle differences in the evolving proprietary format and not all information about all reference entries or articles is available. Therefore, we recommend that you use Encyclopedia.com citation as a starting point before checking the styles based on school and publication requirements and the latest information provided on these sites. Florida Juvenile Department of Justice (DJJ) plays an important role in the management of the Florida juvenile justice system and the court system. The mission of the Florida Juvenile Department of Justice (DJJ) is to "strengthen public safety through effective prevention, intervention, treatment services to reduce juvenile delinquency These services strengthen families, I can reverse the lives of a certain young man. " The central court tried detention within 24 hours after the arrest. It is usually held in the morning after being arrested. The judge will decide whether to release the accused, if so, what conditions are necessary to protect the victim. The judge may order the accused to "do not contact" with the victim or witness. If the judge does not release the accused, he or she can stay in the detention center for up to 21 days. Florida's criminal justice system handles children and adolesdifferently from adults. If your child is accused of juvenile crime, he or she will enter the Florida Juvenile justice system. The Juvenile Justice Department (DJJ) is focusing on the punishment of the above rehabilitation. Read on to learn the overview of the juvenile justice process. If a child or a young man is arrested for a crime, she will be sent to the Youth Evaluation Center where a reservation will be made and a fingerprint will be attached. She is awarded the detention risk assessment tool (DRAI) which provides a standardized way to judge whether detention is necessary or not. If she does not need to be detained, she will be released to the parent or guardian, but she will be sent to the juvenile detention center (JDC) if the DRAI indicates that detention is necessary.

As unfair prejudice and policies may lead to inequality, the issue of social justice may occur in every aspect of society Problems of social justice are usually shared, but can be divided into two categories. Inter-community treatment and inequitable government regulation Inter-social therapy involves treating a population of people based on personal prejudice and prejudice. These prejudices are most common in sociological categories such as: Unequal government regulations include laws or regulations that create conditions that prevent, restrict, or deny access to the same opportunities and resources as other people in society or otherwise create conditions . These laws may create deliberate (unequivocally) or intentionally (implicitly) conditions of social injustice. In areas where government policy often leads to social inequality and inequality, there are the following. Leftists who are interested in social justice issues: in particular, to know more about them, disseminate knowledge, and directly advertise the excellent voice of a marginalized group. The goal of these SJWs is to pay close attention, fairness, and critically think about these issues; by the way, on the criteria we are going to demonstrate. CSJWs, a social justice warrior for anti-production: This behavior causes (and often deserves) the derogatory intent on the left. We use CSJW to distinguish the rest of this article. Especially in the dark era of American history, we all appeared on the Internet. Conservatives try to think of words, words, and truth as meaningless times, and opposing the fact that it is becoming increasingly important that liberals use them directly. Certain languages Many people will understand the term I'm using - the Millennium social justice defender - as a synonym for the contempt 'social justice fighter'. This is a term that brings weakness by abuse, but it shows an important problem. In a typical demonstration of a dazzling horseshoe shape theory, the special brand of social justice supporters of this millennium distorted the splendid cause of social, economic and political equality to social authoritarian movements. Isolated ideology separates individuals and makes them inhuman. Academic Theory Contemporary social justice movements were published on Twitter, Tumblr, Facebook, Jezebel, Slate, Huffington Post etc It is reminiscent of red panic over civil rights movement (choose one) In the "Transformation Social Justice" section of this question we will explore what social justice is, what the social justice movement has achieved, and whether to translate the movement to effectively address today's most pressing issues . Noam Chomsky generously agreed to share his views on social justice and other topics with Seattle Social Justice magazine. On April 8, 2005, at SJSJ in Boston, Massachusetts, Michael Shankd, director of public relations for World Cultural Open, accepted an interview with Chomsky. SJSJ thanked Shank for his support and coordination for this dialogue. End

Political philosopher John Rawls thinks that a social contract is necessary to treat "justice" as "fair" in order for society to function properly. Rawls believes that social contracts are based on their initial position and everyone decides social rules behind veil of ignorance. In this article we assert that the veil of ignorance is an important feature of the original position. First of all, this article explains the veil of ignorance. Next, I will examine the meaning of Rawls' original position. Being in the original state and wearing a veil of ignorance will deprive one's own tendency to constitute a society around a narrow concern. The problem with adopting a specific framework at the outset is that they define benefits, priorities and goals that can not be used to achieve the concept of social equity. The basic theory of Rawls is that people choose the principle of justice in "original position", which means that they choose the principle of justice according to their basic self-interest. This puts people in their original position behind the "vow of ignorance" and does not know their differences or wrongs. If this ignorance is compromised and there is a difference between individuals, it is impossible to reach a principle agreement. Therefore, the basic rights principle must be applied in order to equalize these differences. Entry essay.com/Philosphy Ethics: Ken Burgess This article contains 3 questions raised by the professor, we need to discuss these issues. The areas of interest I have discussed were Kant, Ian Land, Loa. Entry Philosophy Ethics: Ken Burgess This article contains 3 questions raised by the professor, we need to discuss these issues. The areas of interest I have discussed were Kant, Ian Land, Loa. The original position of Rawls and the "thick" ignorant veil represents not a requirement of utilitarianism but a concept of different fairness. In other words, to consider their desires equally. The initial position is abstracted from all the information on current situation and current situation (including everyone's hope and special interest). Utilitarians consider the desire and interest of people to give and maximize their satisfaction; therefore, Utilitarians consider moral tolerance and desires and preferences of people's desires and preferences We will suspend judgment as to form a system. For Rawls, the main reason for a thick veil of ignorance is the legitimacy of existing social and political systems, as well as the ability to fairly evaluate existing concepts of desire, preference and good will.

Introduction Hiring an employee at a company or using wasta to do an important business is an ancient act that has existed for many years. Here, individuals often operate with a trusted network of people who love their Ista (or other trusted but a member of a powerful society) to gain work and business opportunities (Hansen, 1996). Since it becomes clear here and that reason can not withstand the moral theory ideally applied to all commercial transactions in the organization, using wasta builds a trust network for business organization While you can argue that you can help. The subject of this article is not - at least not a direct moral theory, but rather it is the definition of morality. Moral theory is big and complicated, but the definition is not so. The problem of moral definition is the question of determining the theoretical goal of morality. By identifying this goal, we can see different moral theories trying to capture the same thing. Thus, the difference between moral definition and moral theory is similar to the difference between John Rawls (1971: 9) in the general concept of justice and various detailed concepts. However, Rawls' words mean psychological distinction, and many people have a concept of justice. But the definition / theoretic difference is not psychological, only moral theorists usually have a moral theory. Introduction Moral theory helps doctors prove and reflect on the moral decisions they have made. Moral theory is different from other theories. They help to prove that we make moral decisions, but they are often unpredictable. There are several reasons to be cautious about moral theory, but they also have great potential to enrich critical reflections on our decisions. Utilitarianism, Cantism, Virtue theory, four principles, and sophistication: Many moral philosophies include studies of comprehensive moral theories such as Aristotle (theory of virtue), cant (doctrine of morality), and the moral theory formed by the mill (utilitarianism). Philosophers have justified reasons to develop these complex systems. The theory provides a systematic approach to interpret, explain and certify ethical behavior. They may ask that they should reply to their argument and accept (if the proof is not fake). They can try to conclude that all non-believers are irrational dogmasters. To make matters worse, this course allows you to touch only one moral theory without knowing other options. Theoretical contact is far from expanding the moral perspectives of the students, but not narrowing the moral outlook of the students.

The rich leads, but the middle class workers are left behind. If the minimum wage is consistent with inflation, it will reach $ 10.74 today. However, not only is the minimum wage stagnating, in general, the wages of the majority of people, including the middle class, have not kept pace with inflation. Therefore, in order to keep up with middle-class families without delay, we need to do some full-time jobs while reducing many things that make up American dreams, such as home ownership and retirement. When considering how to reduce inequality in the United States, it is useful to divide the income into three parts: income from work, income from income and social welfare. From a mathematical point of view, inequality can be reduced only by balancing the income distribution of each bucket, moving income from nonqualified buckets to equalization buckets, or a combination of the two. With this framework in mind, the first thing I have to do is to revolutionize the national labor law in such a way as to encourage massive unionization of the labor market as a whole. Under the new labor system, all workers and employers in each division will collectively negotiate to determine the terms of employment in that department. By strengthening the workers' bargaining power and claiming collective wages, this reform will transfer some income from the owner to the workers and will also reduce the income distribution of the workers. Income inequality is a sustained problem in the United States. It has a big influence on American American dreams. America's dream is that everyone is equal and have equal opportunities. The majority of what happens in America does not match American dreams, but women are not equal in the workplace. They are under the so-called "glass ceiling". Women are not promoted in the workplace and have not received the same pay as men. This has also led to the exploitation of low-income countries in high-income countries. Over the years, even the poorest countries have improved the living environment all around the world. Nonetheless, there is still a big difference between high-income countries and low-income countries. High-income countries are defined as countries with a very rich economic system, most of which have rather high incomes, but low-income countries are defined as low economic systems. Some people think that the United States has done little to secure equal opportunities as income inequality in today's politics becomes more prominent. Today, many economists use low social and economic liquidity among generations as evidence of these trends. The second principle of philosopher John Rawls' justice points out that there is inequality as long as social inequality improves the overall happiness of the most wealthy members of society. However, it is said that the current income and opportunity inequality in the US violates Rawls' second principle of justice.

Outline of contemporary social contract theory essay POLS 14033 - Political thought and ideology Appearance of contemporary social contract theory papers First of all, this article explains and analyzes various concepts of modern society's evolution and emergence. Social contract theory analyzes several important political thinkers. We will examine in detail the emerging concepts indispensable for the emergence and development of the theory, such as the origins of society and the legitimacy of state authority for individuals. In the 18th century, the social theory before the classical era forms a new form and provides basic ideas of social theory such as evolution theory, historical philosophy, social life and social contract, public and public will, social space competition Did. Organic model of social description In the "spirit of law", Montesquieu may be the first person to uncover the history universally, clarifying the influence of social factors on human nature. As part of the explanation of political and historical events, Montesquieu includes more manners and manners 23. Rousseau has two different social contract theories. The first one was discovered in his essay "Origin and foundation of human inequality", often referred to as the second discourse. It is a moral and political evolution from the natural state to modern humanity over time. Explanation Society therefore includes his account of the naturalization of social contracts that he believes is very problematic. Second, as stated in the social compact, the normative or idealized of his social contract designed to provide a means to alleviate the problems that modern society has created for us It is theory. John Rawls, a professor at Harvard University, wrote "Theory of Justice" in 1972 as a trigger for the revival of modern social contract philosophy. He outlined the theory of justice in two aspects, the theme of liberty and the subject of differences. Many philosophers are breaking the principle of Rawls, but his writing began a new and vigorous dialogue on common interests with civil society (Wikipedia). David Gotzel of the "Ethics Agreement" announced in 1986 returned to Hobbes' moral and political philosophy, but unlike Hobbes claiming a purely selfish motive of signing a contract I agree to cooperate and cooperate at the time (ibid)

Moral Theory A. Morality comes from God. Therefore, ethical behavior is an act that is consistent with the will of God. Immoral behavior is contrary to the will of God. The church properly explained the will of God. Evaluation: I feel this until the last sentence. They do not agree with each other, so there are so many sects. Many religions differ in interpretation of the will of God, not to mention mistakes. I think that most of morality comes from God. The subject of this article is not - at least not a direct moral theory, but rather it is the definition of morality. Moral theory is big and complicated, but the definition is not so. The problem of moral definition is the question of determining the theoretical goal of morality. By identifying this goal, we can see different moral theories trying to capture the same thing. Thus, the difference between moral definition and moral theory is similar to the difference between John Rawls (1971: 9) in the general concept of justice and various detailed concepts. However, Rawls' words mean psychological distinction, and many people have a concept of justice. But the difference between definition and theory is not psychological, only moral theorists usually have a moral theory. Introduction Moral theory helps doctors prove and reflect on the moral decisions they have made. Moral theory is different from other theories. They help to prove that we make moral decisions, but they are often unpredictable. There are several reasons to be cautious about moral theory, but they also have great potential to enrich critical reflections on our decisions. Utilitarianism, Cantism, Virtue theory, four principles, and sophistication: Many moral philosophies include studies of comprehensive moral theories such as Aristotle (theory of virtue), cant (doctrine of morality), and the moral theory formed by the mill (utilitarianism). Philosophers have justified reasons to develop these complex systems. The theory provides a systematic approach to interpret, explain and certify ethical behavior. They may ask that they should reply to their argument and accept (if the proof is not fake). They can try to conclude that all non-believers are irrational dogmasters. To make matters worse, this course allows you to touch only one moral theory without knowing other options. Theoretical contact is far from enlarging the moral perspectives of the students, but narrowing the moral outlook of the students.

The general health care debate is now an era of revolutionizing the healthcare system in the United States. The aging of the baby-boomer generation and our medical industry will bring unprecedented pressure. As a medical professional in the industry, I witnessed the elderly, young people and the middle-aged face. Purchase medicine or pay the cost of grocery: they need to make any decision that the family should not face. For those who are suggesting to change my health care screaming at the Town Hall Meeting leading us in the path of a socialist society, you are the one who benefits from government support. Justify the use of the principles of social decisions of health to influence the achievement of society, so as to develop arguments of universal health care "Righteous" justice and fair "by Norman Daniels John Rawls, complete research I thought about Kantian in society as a whole. dialectic. Although Rawls's work is not directly related to healthcare, it provides Daniels use it to explain the principle of "fair distribution of social decisions on health factors". Rawls showed two principles. The first principle concerns equality rights and equality of all civic defenders for freedom. The second principle is divided into two parts. The first part of the second principle of social structure that all citizens sharpened to have the same access to income, wealth, status and social superiority must provide equal opportunities. Justify the use of the principles of social decisions of health to influence the achievement of society, so as to develop arguments of universal health care "Righteous" justice and fair "by Norman Daniels John Rawls, complete research I thought about Kantian in society as a whole. dialectic. Although Rawls's work is not directly related to healthcare, it provides Daniels use it to explain the principle of "fair distribution of social decisions on health factors". Rawls showed two principles. The first principle concerns equality rights and equality of all civic defenders for freedom. The second principle is divided into two parts. The first part of the second principle of social structure that all citizens sharpened to have the same access to income, wealth, status and social superiority must provide equal opportunities.

In Chapter 2, Mill looked at the issue of whether people should be allowed to force or restrict the expression of others' opinions, either through the government or through themselves. Muller emphasized that this behavior is illegal. Even though only one person has a particular view, humans have no reason to silence him. Mill took away 'human beings, future generations, and modern people', he said it is wrong to silence these views. In particular, it robs those who disagree with these silent opinions. About grinding freedom, 70. Marcus singer argues that the view presented in "freedom" is strongly influenced by Harriet Taylor in "About Loreth concerning Rawls' freedom". Utilitarian views are fundamentally different. This is an interesting idea, and we want to pursue it at another time. Among the subjects influenced by Taylor, Mill often appeals to justice in a way that appears to be different from Utilitarianism. Fred Berger discussed this in detail in happiness, freedom and justice. Nevertheless, Muller still has a long way to go away from Bentham, and in Chapter 5 of Utilitarian justice is certainly taken into consideration from a practical point of view. As he said, he is very interested in "utility of the most important meaning". However, there remains the question of whether Utilitarianism can prove absolute equality between men and women in all circumstances - this is exactly what justice demands In his paper "Freedom Mill" he argues that his utilitarian version is based on the concept of happiness for people as "progressive" (Mill, On Liberty, 12). In Utilitarianism he believes that this concept focuses on "higher fun" primarily used to distinguish between humans and animals (Mill, Utilitarianism, 7-11). These higher pleasures have transformed Aristotle's notion that we are actually deliberating power - choice, judgment, decision and discriminatory activity and pursuit. In the Statue of Liberty, Mill wrote: "In the world ... People who choose his life plan for him do not need other abilities, not imitations of humans. When all his talent develops his actual deliberative ability and enjoy their movement, he gets pride, it is the basis of good and good life.

Many political philosophers use ethical themes to introduce civilization theory. Human morality and political system are intertwined with human nature. By definition, morality is a distinction between justice and justice. Therefore, without using the concept of moral philosophers of the same department, understanding and applying them in different contexts according to their theory,. Interpretation among political thinkers is various. Special theorists believe that morality exists in human life, but it is produced in various ways. Some philosophers point out that morality depicts social norms of behavior and other types of groups (Gert, 2002). Construct morality that critically reflects morality. There is no distinction between morality and morality in this report. "Moral" and "moral" are used interchangeably. On behalf of NCTV, WODC asked RAND European Development Method List 7 to support ethical decision in countering terrorism. The method outlined in the WODC requirements RAND European terrorism experts can take advantage of the advantages, but the method has been developed and we do not recommend strengthening in the Netherlands. Given the limited evidence to support ethical decision-making counter-terrorism legislation, land European research methods, such as military, police and intelligence agencies, that can be used by professionals in the area of ​​counterterrorism This entry is complemented by modern empirical research programs and analyzes moral development as a persistent philosophical point of view. In the first two sections we summarize what moral development is and how important it is to moral and human theory. "Root" part of the recorded version of the history of moral nature development with Confucius, Aristotle, Rousseau, and Rawls. In the next four sections, we will evaluate current empirical research of moral psychology, focusing on Piaget and Coleberg's cognitive development methodology and philosophy. In the "Critical Details" section, the discussion applies to the main focus of moral development stage, competitive moral philosophy, criticism and feminist theory. "Different voices of care" focuses on the conflict of justice and merciful ethics. After that, we focused on the practice of the classroom and summarized the "teaching significance" of moral cognition research

In 1748, David Hume wrote "Discussion on Human Understanding" in Enlightenment and on the eve of Industry and Science Revolution. Therefore, some of the ideas used and comparisons are only outdated, but even if there is science, they contribute to his argument about causality. Hume 's biggest concern is the origin of causality, how to acquire knowledge from causality, and whether it can even call the knowledge in causality a real knowledge. I read the human understanding survey (1748) by David Hume at the university. I am not satisfied with this, this is not voluntary. The only purpose I started writing this book was to loot these interesting things for reference and citation. As books often occur - I reluctantly learned something. According to Mr. Dave, the impression is "vibrant vivid perception". They are instantaneous, unruly, and tweets of information are always integrated into our conscious and unconscious minds. For example, red is the impression. The same can be said about anger. The bell rang. warm. Itches it. Darkness ... Because we can not control what we feel, we can not control what we "impress". The impression is that we hear, see, feel, love, hate, desire, or hope will happen. They are primitive and instinctive and can be thought of as "atoms" of the thought process. Minimum particle to sum up to create - David Hume (1711-1776) is a Scottish philosopher and economist. He tried to apply scientific methods, especially from a knowledge perspective, to the exploration of the essence of human beings. Rawls said Hume called justice as "cautious and unwieldy virtue". He refers to Hume's book "Theory of Humanity" (1739) and "Exploring the Moral Principle" (1751). Rolls discussed his own view on the situation of justice based on Hume. He further stated that Hume could determine the terms of the justice society when discussing the concept of reasonable and fair sympathy for the audience. In 1748, David Hume wrote "Discussion on Human Understanding" in Enlightenment and on the eve of Industry and Science Revolution. Therefore, some of the ideas used and comparisons are only outdated, but even if there is science, they contribute to his argument about causality. Hume 's biggest concern is the origin of causality, how to acquire knowledge from causality, and whether it can even call the knowledge in causality a real knowledge.

Punishing illegal and unwelcome unusual members of society is a part of criminal justice that experienced various changes throughout history. The concept of retaliation is still constant (the idea that legal vandalism must somehow repay debt to society), but the way it is used to enforce and achieve retaliation has changed dramatically. The possibility of social growth and development, and permanent fear of crime, is closely related to the use of various forms of punishment including public execution, forced labor, criminal welfareism, universal punishment for hundreds of years It is relevant. What? Retaliable Justice - Punishable by just punishing torts - Do punishment comply with crime? Compensatory justice - Compensation for loss incurred by people when slandered by others - Damage caused by apartheid? Correcting justice - Should we regard the law itself as a judicial tool to regard as fair? Distribution - policy to justify policy cost unfairness, all other social values ​​(freedom and opportunity, income and wealth, and the basis for self-esteem) Taking into account the unfair people who will benefit from the principle of RAWLS , Uneven distribution is good for everyone It is rooted in the place and time detailing the life of celebrities, but it tries to solve the big theme of these beings: Is punishment suitable for crime? In the daily fight of Black Life, the author is drowning the deep theory on reader's ethics and aesthetics. This idea applies to the whole script. As a result, the play began to discover that her husband and his wife were infected by a young man. The young man jumped out of the window and left his "suit." The neighbors were shocked at the sight of the bare youth running along the street. For anger and contempt, my husband instructed his wife to wear this suit for the rest of his marriage. And that is the sign of her sin and shame. So marriage will continue to be like this Retaliation: "Killers get what they deserve" "Punishment is appropriate for crime" and "Look to the eyes." For many criminals, this seems to be a controversial discussion. Because punishment is not necessarily suitable for crime. For example, those who attack, rape or rap up will not be raped. The Justice Center at Alaska Anchorage University offers the following section of the website entitled "Death: Specific Issues - Retaliation and Justice of Murder Victims".

The UK is known for its educational institutions. There are some of the most famous universities in the world, such as Oxford University, Cambridge University, University of London and others. Cambridge is located in Cambridgeshire, known as the home of Cambridge University, one of the oldest and most prestigious universities in the world. Cambridge covers a range of 16 square miles. It is located in the place where the river crosses 50 miles north of London, east coast of Kam River, originally. Cambridge University (informal Cambridge University) is a public research university located in the University of Cambridge, England. Founded in 1209, the University of Cambridge was awarded the Kingdom Charter by King Henry III in 1231. It is the second oldest university in the English speaking world, the fourth oldest university in the world. The university was developed by a consortium of scholars who left the university. After Oxford University argued with citizens, the two medieval universities had much in common. And it is often called "Niuqiao". Due to the history and influence of Cambridge University, Cambridge University is one of the most prestigious universities in the world. Published at the Cambridge University Publishing Bureau in Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, St. Paul, Cambridge University Press Center, Edinburgh Building, Cambridge cb 2 2 ru, British Cambridge University Press, New York publication www.cambridge.org Information on this title www.cambridge.org/9780521815741 Cambridge University Press 2004 Copyright belongs to this publication. Unless you have written permission from the University of Cambridge Publishing Authority, you are prohibited from reproducing any part within the scope of legal exceptions and related collective license agreements. Isbn - 13 isbn - 10, the first public opening in 2004 Maryemma graham is a Cambridge fellowship for African American novels (Cambridge fellows go up to 1 liter) Secondary materials are Adams, Richard, McLeod, Murdo, Editor. Cambridge America has a history of people. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. The first part contains 11 articles about the earliest Central American people, including Tolteks. Carrasco, David, Jones, Lindsay and Sessions, Scott, ed. : Classical heritage of Central America: From Teotihuacan to the Aztecs. Boulder: University of Colorado Press, 2000. Collect academic papers and discuss the impact of Toltec's culture on later civilization Rawls's complex equalityism, "Samuel Freeman, editor. Cambridge and Rawls companion (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003). His special concern is what the lucky equalizer calls Rawls Daniels "Daniels says," There is no judgment about the truth of the validity of this view, it is more specific than a common characteristic of public democratic culture, These recommendations are presented in the following research: David Gauthier, Ethics Agreement (Oxford: Clarendon, 1986), Richard Arneson, "Equal Opportunity for Welfare "Philosophical study, 56 (1989): 77-93, Amartya Sen, reexamination of inequality (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 1992), John Rawls, Justice theory, 2nd edition. Turn it. (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard Publishing Bureau, 1999) and Dworkin, "Equality of Resources", His Sovereign Virtue, pp. 65-119

Plato and John Rawls provide us with a moral community explanation, so they assume that different viewpoints of humans are such community order. In this article we will try to study that this moral and political community is based on Plato and John Rawls. Since my paper suggests an orderly community that focuses on the happiness of everyone, not just one person, Plato's view on the moral and political community that it is better than John Rawls I will support it. According to Socrates 'Plato' s words, "I believe that if the community is properly developed, it has everything it needs to do good things." The key words of this sentence are "correctly found" And "before night" is. " Society is built on the extension of this principle. Large families, families, and tribes are all born of the idea that defending themselves is not only acceptable but moral. Political construction - Let's streamline instincts, expand self defense and create larger, more diverse groups that are more prosperous than tribes and tribes. However, subjective values ​​still exist. The government should lay people's lives above the lives of other people. The view of the military is national security and improvement of national interest. It is reasonable to expect each country to act for the benefit of the whole human race, but this is always secondary. It is impossible to protect everyone at all times. Therefore, as argued by justice war theorists, it is morally obligatory to preserve their lives if a country is forced to make a choice between the lives of its citizens and the lives of other people It is done. Political realism refuses to use the moral laws governing the universe to determine the moral desire of a particular country. It is the concept of profit defined by interest to protect us from moral excess and political foolishness. If we treat all countries as political entities pursuing their respective interests defined by their respective interests, we can treat them all in a fair and dual sense I will. After judging them, we can pursue policies that respect the interests of other countries while protecting and promoting their interests.

Some think Kant's concept of autonomy is necessary to dismiss moral realism and to support 'moral constitutionalism'. However, when reviewing the paragraphs mentioned in moral metaphysics (with the help of Kant's lecture and reflection), the central legislative concept of Kant's autonomy concept is a clear anti-structuralism in his moral philosophy It represents an idea. . I. Summary: Significance of "Kant's Moral Constitutionalism" A. In John Rawls of Justice The choice of the principle of creating justice from the original standpoint of Rawls is "constructive" in "useful meanings" It is expressed as. About "dispute resolution", this idea Constitutionalism in meta ethics thinks that moral truth is determined or determined by the result of real or virtual deliberation or selection procedures. Many of those who interpret Kant as constructurists believe that if the analysis of his "responsibility" and "goodwill" has a moral requirement, the agent they are detaining will have autonomy of will It is said that it shows. O'Neil) 1989; Reath 2006; Hill 1989 a, 1989 b, 2001; Cureton 2013, 2014; Engstrom 2009). In this sense, autonomy means that these entities are both authors of moral law and the subject of moral law, so they are not bound by any external requirement that may exist outside the scope of our intention It means. On the contrary, we only follow the moral requirements that we impose on ourselves by applying our own rationality, independent of natural desires and tendencies. However, the Cantiers in this camp was against the characteristics of this rational process. In this article we will explore the concept of whether Kant is constitutive and his view on this topic. First, I will outline Constructivist and moral realist. From the 19th century of Darwin's theory, human knowledge can no longer provide "truth" for human understanding. Constructivists believe that our moral reasons are not derived from our demands and benefits, they are rooted in a reasonable existence. Morality is universal and is seen as necessary to combine rational creatures. The moral realist believes that there is a moral fact and that our moral opinion on these facts may be accurate or counterfeit. Moral realists tend to be cognitiveists like Christine Korsgaard who actually think Kant is a moral realist. Acceptance of his moral obligation gave him a certain constitutionalism.

From ancient monarchs to today's democracy, the order has been maintained through legal regulations. Compliance with these laws is done by severe punishment aimed at reducing personal violence and cheating in society. But when social contracts are inconsistent with the laws accepted by God so that citizens agree to abide by the laws of the country in which they live, a person will support justice and make an unfair decision of that person I will be forced to condemn. Two concepts of civil disobedience, Martin Luther King Jr. and John Rawls, Martin Luther King's review of the concept of civil disobedience (Martin Luther King Jr.) seems to be a radical extremist However, in the history he has not been portrayed on this subject. The definition of John Rawls' civil disobedience is very passive, so I doubt if he is quietly opposed to this behavior. Martin Luther King Jr. sought civil rights for blacks in the 1960s, but Rawls did not have a specific target group with his "social contract" theory. It is known as "civil disobedience". One of the most famous citizens opposing extremist activists was Martin Luther King Jr. during the 1960s American civil rights movement. The theory of nonviolence against gold fraud involves a process of promoting a peaceful dialogue to gain understanding while adjusting the differences. But when artificial law attempts to deny the law of God, Kim urges people to use creative tension in the form of disobedience of the people. The center of American character is a seemingly contradictory phenomenon: America is a legitimate republic, but it has civic disobedience for many years. Martin Luther King, the most famous citizen's disobedience supporter, citizen's disobedience is not lawless, it is designed to adapt aggressive or artificial law to a more sophisticated law, namely natural law or sacred law I think that it is. But as Kim's heritage makes it clear, the theoretical basis for civil disobedience is complicated and the actual impact is problematic. In special circumstances, the free constitutional government's first principle is reasonable, but it poses a threat to the rule of law. Decisions on when the environment will be needed and how citizens do not follow them should be subject to the most prudent and prudent regulations.

Outline of contemporary social contract theory essay POLS 14033 - Political thought and ideology Appearance of contemporary social contract theory papers First of all, this article explains and analyzes various concepts of modern society's evolution and emergence. Social contract theory analyzes several important political thinkers. We will examine in detail the emerging concepts indispensable for the emergence and development of the theory, such as the origins of society and the legitimacy of state authority for individuals. In the 18th century, the social theory before the classical era forms a new form and provides basic ideas of social theory such as evolution theory, historical philosophy, social life and social contract, public and public will, social space competition Did. Organic model of social description In the "spirit of law", Montesquieu may be the first person to uncover the history universally, clarifying the influence of social factors on human nature. As part of the explanation of political and historical events, Montesquieu includes more manners and manners 23. Rousseau has two different social contract theories. The first one was discovered in his essay "Origin and foundation of human inequality", often referred to as the second discourse. It is a moral and political evolution from the natural state to modern humanity over time. Explanation Society therefore includes his account of the naturalization of social contracts that he believes is very problematic. Second, as stated in the social compact, the normative or idealized of his social contract designed to provide a means to alleviate the problems that modern society has created for us It is theory. John Rawls, a professor at Harvard University, wrote "Theory of Justice" in 1972 as a trigger for the revival of modern social contract philosophy. He outlined the theory of justice in two aspects, the theme of liberty and the subject of differences. Many philosophers are breaking the principle of Rawls, but his writing began a new and vigorous dialogue on common interests with civil society (Wikipedia). David Gotzel of the "Ethics Agreement" announced in 1986 returned to Hobbes' moral and political philosophy, but unlike Hobbes claiming a purely selfish motive of signing a contract I agree to cooperate and cooperate at the time (ibid)

Liberalism and liberalism liberalism are the forces that change from the birth of this country to today's politics. Prior to signing the Constitution, the principle of liberalism was the foundation of American political thought and behavior. Of course, to maintain legal power over the years, liberalism has to change. When considering this change, we may ask if the idea and goal of classical liberalism were lost when it turned into modern liberalism. Individual freedom is often seen as the core value of liberalism. However, freedom can be categorized into two categories: negative and positive. Negative freedom, traditionally associated with classical liberalism, promotes incoherent beliefs and lacks all external constraints on individuals. This means that individuals should be able to freely pursue their own interests without external restrictions or pressure. Nevertheless, negative freedom does not mean that an individual should have absolute and unlimited freedom. J. S. A classical liberal like Mill can bring the right to display more content, that is "permission", ie harm to others, or ... if freedom is infinite I believe Liberalists believe freedom is a fundamental value, but a fair country guarantees personal freedom. Liberal feminists agree with this view and claim women's freedom. Liberalism feminism takes several forms, as liberalism means a disagreement about freedom. This entry describes two basic liberal feminism. In the first part, I will explain what is often called "free feminism" in philosophical literature. Free feminism sees freedom as personal autonomy - living the life of choice - and political autonomy - is conditional coauthor. In the second part of the live we will explain what is called "classical - liberal feminism" or sometimes "liberal feminism" (these terms are used interchangeably here). Classical liberalism or liberal feminism regards freedom as freedom from mandatory interference In the category of Jaguar, liberal feminism is still a strong tendency of feminist political thought. After paying attention to liberalism and equality, the main focus of liberal feminism is to protect and strengthen women's personal and political autonomy, the first is to live freely throughout their lives, The second is helping to determine the direction of political society. It is free. . This approach became more active as a result of John Rawls's "Theory of Justice" (Rolls 1971) and subsequent political liberalism (Rolls 1993) issuance. Susan Moller Okin (Okin 1989, 1979; Okin et al. 1999) and Eva Kittay (Kittay 1999) productively expanded his theory using Rawls' research and focused on women's concerns.

Introduction: Lauren Schoolberg is in principle a follower of the theory of moral development of Piaget, but he hopes to extend his theory and establish his theory by studying this particular subject I will. Kohlberg is a very intellectual student who has worked as a professor at Harvard University. He studied this problem at Harvard University's Moral Education Center, published his theory of moral development, which became popular. Coleburg believes that the moral behavior of people is based on their moral reasoning and their moral reasoning changes according to their behavior and behavior as they move from one stage to another . Moral development plays an important role in our social interaction. Understanding how an individual makes its decisions and why in an ethical dilemma can be very useful in many situations. The theory of moral development of Kohlberg provides a framework for investigating and understanding how moral reasoning develops within an individual. This entry analyzes the moral development as a perennial philosophical perspective complemented by modern empirical research programs. In the first two sections we summarize what moral development is and how important it is for moral theory and humanism. The "Route" section contains historical versions of moral and natural development, including Confucius, Aristotle, Rousseau and Rawls. In the next four sections, we will evaluate empirical research on current moral psychology focusing on Piaget and Coleberg's cognitive development method and its philosophical theory. In the "Critical Detail" section, the discussion has been applied to the theory of moral developmental stage, focusing on the main competition of moral philosophy, criticism and feminist theory. "Voice of various attention" focuses on conflict of justice and benevolence of mercy. Next, focusing on practice in the classroom, I summarized the "educational significance" of moral recognition research. Moral development focuses on the emergence, change and understanding of ethics from early childhood to adulthood. Morality develops throughout life and is influenced by personal experience and behavior when confronted with ethical problems through physical and cognitive development at different times. In short, morality is related to the growing consciousness of right and wrong of individuals; therefore, infant's moral judgment and personality are different from adults. Morality itself is often synonymous with "right" or "good". It refers to a code of conduct arising from the personal philosophy that leads to that person's culture, religion, or person's behavior, behavior and thought.

And it is the responsibility of the recruiter. Stolley (1993), every year from 2% Child adoption is often regarded as a temporary legal act in that field and work of a social worker. Adoptive adoption called "life mother", "first mother", "Korean mother", "mother" "Natural parents", "biological mothers", "secular mothers", "unmarried girls", "real mothers" "They took away the children" (Spencer, 1979). Ask clinical social work environment what sort of employer is Social workers help to say that adoption is not that terrible as wonderful either. Other candles, each representing a part of adoption's life. In most cases Christian adoption parents say they are "color blind" but they will never attend church Alternatives such as caring for trees, identification of all children The author's approach is one of the most destructive statements that children listen to from parents to their parents. Yes, "Sorry, I can not have your own." They can leave, they can say "It's private," they can share what they have adopted. Children's Life In that study many parents told the children that the race is not a problem, Biasing is necessary. In the practice of the author, it is common for the recruiters to express their anger toward racists. literature. Finally, it is also important to combine the spiritual or religious beliefs of each individual. Child born of unmarried parent born illegally internationally, Child adopted by foreign child, Unnecessary child Multilateral Third Country Settlement Law [Improvement of American School Law in 1994] (P.L.103-382) and 1996 Small Business Medical Protection Law Inter-ethnic Interregional Settlement Regulation (P.L. 104-188) For details of these laws and regulations, please visit http://www.nacac.org/policy/laws.html. These two photos of Sam reflect contradictory views on adoption. Both of these perspectives are very relevant to the work of clinicians, administrators, decision makers, and researchers of social work. Because they form policies, laws, and clinical practice. One view is the use of some idealized romantic terms. The second view is that adoption is closely related to difficulties. Understanding the prejudices of these ideas and understanding how to manage them by practicing social work is key to effective service provision. Languages, beliefs, stereotypes, and flawed opinions can affect adoption laws, policies, and clinical practices. It also delivers a subtle but powerful force to those being driven through adoption. For example, adoption people are widely believed to be more susceptible to problems than non-adopted people. However, although the proportion of adopted children in clinical samples is too high, research indicates that there are many possible reasons, such as adoptive parents seeking more specialized help. According to research, the majority of adopted children are as successful as adult children, even though they are growing. Using Rawls' s approach to social justice, he criticized the practice of international adoption of children. From this point of view, international adoption is considered contradictory to the principle of social justice, and the social background in which it occurs is ignored. In many cases, the social background surrounding international adoption has the right to know discrimination and birth against girls who are deprived of citizenship due to serious poverty and poor adoption, low social status, girls Children. Risks identified by children together with history and parentage relationships, children ethnicity, culture, groups of countries may involve children's abduction, fraud and trafficking acts and practices. This paper presents other views including liberalism and Utilitarianism.

The two great philosophers and their main theory Sigmund Sromo Freud were Austrian neurologists, born May 6, 1856. Freud is considered a father of psychoanalysis, his unconscious thinking and repressive theory. Freud created a clinical approach to psychoanalysis to research and treat psychopathology. Freud understands the human brain's work. He is very interested in this and I think this is one reason why he became a neurologist. Freud came from a poor family of eight children, and he liked most of his brothers and sisters. The essential aspect of ongoing discussions among philosophers, psychologists, and scientists refers to individual genetic and / or biological genes. Jean Jacques Rousseau is one of the main philosophers of this faith. Through this theory, one already has a genetic marker at birth, and it will determine his / her personality traits and characteristics. This is also known as biological determinism. (05 Child's growth, 1 page) Another aspect of discussion is the development of philosophy. The famous leader of this theory is John Locke. He thinks that everyone is a "white angel". In other words, knowledge and culture on the person's environment will determine the person's personality and behavior (05 The Developing Child, p.1). In this model, society influences individuals through language, culture, values, relationships and so on. Walzer's first basic premise is that human society is based on the principle of distributive justice. Walzer suspects that the general philosophy is that there is only a fair distribution system and that it is the system that all reasonable men and women agree. The idea has found a very strong form of Rawls' justice theory, especially the concept of veil of natural state and ignorance. "The principle of justice itself is diversifying, according to different procedures different agents should assign different social goods for different reasons All these differences arise from different understandings of social goods themselves - historical and cultural Necessity productivity expertise product "(Walzer, 1983: 6) Biologically, there are many differences in complexity between men and women. Men are usually tall, heavy, strong. According to philosophers during enlightenment, their nature is usually the nature of barbarians, always seeking power and control. Women tend to be short and light, and usually weaker than men. These simple factors are for explaining violence against women and refer to women who were considered to be sexual in the past and belonged to male subjects. For example, rape is a biological phenomenon occurring throughout history, not regarded as a violent act, but rather as a male right to a wife. A woman is expected to encounter sexually with her husband, and if not, the man will retreat

The conflict of faith Earth and all the life above it are created within 7 days, at least this is how I grew up in the Catholic family. This is all I know, until I first heard about the evolution of a fifth grade. I can not understand that concept and my mother can not tell me what it is because she does not believe it may be true. Over the next few years, I gradually learned more about evolution. When I learned that Darwin's strange thing is called "correction and decline", my growth experience began to be questioned. It is based on the theory of absoluteism: - There is a single list of truths - they can only be represented by a series of concepts - they require the same actions around the world - it conflicts with faith, Culture must be respected - assume that people must use only one set of concepts to express moral truth. - KANT JOHN S. MILL JOHN RAWLS to check ethical dilemmas, cooperate with justice, thoroughly understand possible alternatives, assume ethical arguments, compare and evaluate discussions of alternatives. 384 - 322 1724 - 1804 1806 - 1873 1921 - 2002 Looking at the moral dilemma reflecting your ethical decisions and checking the results 3 09/09/2013 Virtual ethical virtual Cultural confrontation is a big topic. As a nurse leader, we are: 1) to promote cultural conflict, 2) to see the appropriate situation from the perspective of cultural conflict, and 3) to explore from providing cultural conflicts and cultural sensitivity A deeper understanding of people's perspective I hope that the point I used to classify all of these has now been revealed to be one of meme and boundary. It is easy to construct this global phenomenon thanks to the conflict of faith that various cultures have, that is, the complex interaction of the country's rats, the collective stories of mice and the experience of the city, and the mechanism of interaction. When the world is experiencing a conflict of faith, the audience asks about the state of secular ethics. The Dalai Lama said: "There is nothing to destroy others' faith, which can not be his belief."

Fairness of the Treaty of Versailles and the Consequence of Germany The Treaty of Versailles aims at a peace agreement between the Allies and Germany after the end of the First World War in 1918. The treaty signed a palace involving allies (France, UK, USA) and Germany at the Palace of Versailles in Paris. Many politicians were involved in the huge palace, but the most important three were Georges Clemenceau (France), Woodrow Wilson (USA), David Lloyd George (UK). When assessing the fairness of the Versailles Treaty, we need to consider the impact of the Convention, not only on Germany, but also on the Convention and all the major powers involved in the First World War. In particular in Germany, it is important to consider the Versailles Treaty in an economic, military, territorial and colonial way to determine the fairness of the treaty. - Rawls is trying to establish moral ethics by defining fairness as fair within the range of its original position in "justice theory". Rawls's theory puts individual freedom at an equal position to account for Utilitarian flaws. In spite of Sandell's criticism, Rawls as a fair theory correctly protects the redistribution system of society as a whole and solves the problem of inequality in luck. Is Versaillan's Charlotte Gallagher Treaty fair? I think the Treaty of Versailles is unfair to Germany. Germany is looking forward to being invited but they are not invited to participate in the discussion of the Versailles Treaty. The German government has only two weeks to review the provisions of the Versailles treaty, and furthermore most of their comments are ignored, and Germany will be invaded, forced to sign the treaty. The Treaty of Versailles shows Big Four: (USA, UK, France, Italy) Germany will never want to make a comeback. In addition, since the government tried to reach a peaceful solution to end World War I, Germany should have opportunities. Besides, compared to other countries like the UK, Germany has lost millions of people, so Germany paid a huge price. 213 The main purpose of the Treaty of Versailles is to ensure that Germany is punished for war. He does not want Germany to fall into an economic crisis Germany admitted that it was responsible for the war and was forced to sign the Treaty of Versailles. This is Article 231 of the Treaty of Versailles. This is to prepare Article 232 of the Treaty of Versailles. There, Germany stipulates that Germany should pay compensation or indemnity for damage caused to the allies. Germany approved the Treaty of Versailles, partially comply with certain aspects and did not comply with other aspects, fully complying with certain aspects. Germany fully comply with the loss of the territory and abandoned all the lands that it should have abandoned. Germany has begun paying for the first few compensations or compensation to allies. Then they stopped and urged the French army to invade a part of Germany. The League of Nations instructed France to withdraw from Germany, but this problem has been largely ignored. Germany does not comply with disarmament control

Ethics of Livestock and Land: Reaction to J. Baird · Caricot Preface Peter Singer's "Animation Liberation and Environmental Ethics: Awful Marriage, Rapid Divorce" and Peter Singer's "All Animals Equality" is a Basic Definition That seems to ignore animals, that is, the degree of their domestication. The assumption and exclusion of these two articles made me think more about domestication. Through brainstorming and a summary of my argument, I read J's "Animal Liberation: A Triangular Event". However, as mentioned above, there is a very thoughtful single standard thinker. For example, in his 1989 book "Defense of Land Ethics", J. Beard Kalikot rejects moral eclecticism consciously because it inevitably leads to "moral nonconformity" in difficult situations. This happens because competing ethical claims use different terms to prevent decisive comparisons and solutions. But the strong case is a more gentle, multi-standard theory. In Rolls' influential 'justice theory', the basis for choosing ethical theory is' reflection balance '. Rawls developed this concept in the context of the "original position" of personal anonymity assumed under the ignorance of "veil of ignorance" and chose the ideal norm of justice. The conditions of the initial situation are usually shared, and "preferably weak" is desirable. The way to criticism individualism generally does not adapt to the protection of ecological whole. Baird Callicott (1980) stated, "When things tend to maintain integrity, stability is the correct biome's beauty." This is wrong when it comes to the highest moral principle: in this theory, The Earth's biome itself is the only trail of intrinsic value and the value of its individual members is merely instrumental in response to the contribution to the greater community's "integrity, stability and beauty" is. The direct meaning of this version of land ethics is that individual members of the biological community should be sacrificed as long as it is necessary to protect the community's overall interests.

Morality By evolving rules and regulations that we observe, we lead to separate conclusions that religion and its "morality" have full power to our existence. Morality is quality that meets the criteria of correct behavior or good behavior. However, for most people in the world, so-called Christian morals and religious morals define this correctness and error system. Religion itself is defined as the faith and respect of supernatural power and power considered to be creator and ruler of the universe. The subject of this article is not - at least not a direct moral theory, but rather it is the definition of morality. Moral theory is big and complicated, but the definition is not so. The problem of moral definition is the question of determining the theoretical goal of morality. By identifying this goal, we can see different moral theories trying to capture the same thing. Thus, the difference between moral definition and moral theory is similar to the difference between John Rawls (1971: 9) in the general concept of justice and various detailed concepts. However, Rawls' words mean psychological distinction, and many people have a concept of justice. But the difference between definition and theory is not psychological, only moral theorists usually have a moral theory. There seems to be little reason to believe that a single definition of ethics applies to all ethical arguments. One reason is that "morality" seems to be used in two different broad categories. More specifically, the term "moral" or two "moral" used by a theorist can play a decisive role in the development of moral theory, but sometimes it is not recognized . . If a person uses "moral" in a descriptive sense and therefore uses it to refer to the actual code of conduct proposed by a different group or society, people are almost certainly applied to all universals I deny the existence of moral. The descriptive use of "morality" is what anthropologists use when reporting the social ethics they study. A brief explanation of morality is that it is a clear field of research, including morals of human behavior or behavior. Morality is a mere judgment of human behavior, behavior or behavior, whether correct or wrong, good or bad. Morality can also be defined as research on the basic principles of morality and its application in real situations. The terms "ethics" and "moral" are often used interchangeably as synonyms, but the concept of morality is much broader than the concept of morality. Before we began to learn ethics, we already had a moral sense, and we did a number of moral decisions, and we made conscious the principles on which these judgments were based And there is no need to think obviously. People all over the world seem to have a moral intuition

Impact of the Treaty of Versailles to Germany Dear Henry, Happy New Year. How are you? I wish you good. I'm sorry, I have written for a long time, but I was very busy with war and everything else in Germany. I think that you have seen the provisions of the Treaty of Versailles. This is too outrageous! What do you think? I can not believe how strict they are. The worst part is that we are responsible for initiating the war (Article 231), now we have to accept all but punishment. When assessing the fairness of the Versailles Treaty, we need to consider the impact of the Convention, not only on Germany, but also on the Convention and all the major powers involved in the First World War. In particular in Germany, it is important to consider the Versailles Treaty in an economic, military, territorial and colonial way to determine the fairness of the treaty. - Rawls is trying to establish moral ethics by defining fairness as fair within the range of its original position in "justice theory". Rawls's theory puts individual freedom at an equal position to account for Utilitarian flaws. In spite of Sandell's criticism, Rawls as a fair theory correctly protects the redistribution system of society as a whole and solves the problem of inequality in luck. First of all, the Treaty of Versailles is not strong enough for Germany. In fact, as historian Corelli Burnett argues, if Germany wins this war, the treaty is "very adaptable to Germany compared to the peace clause imposed by the ally" . Burnet said, "Compared to the harsh Brest - Litvsk treaty Germany imposed on defeated Russia, the Versailles treaty" little slap in the face ". As Kissinger pointed out, many German historians condemned German demand that the Treaty of Versailles was too strict, and that Germany was too punished for being "self-compassionate". The role of the Treaty of Versailles in the rise of Hitler The Versailles Convention was essential for Hitler to hold power as it was the reason for the collapse of Germany. Hitler's attitude towards the Treaty of Versailles is very strong and he believes that these provisions are unfair to Germany. Many Germans despise the treaty and hope to reach an agreement on this. Hitler faced there. He wants to abolish the treaty and all its provisions. - The weakness of the Weimar Republic and the rise of Hitler are directly related to the idea that the political power of a country is handed over in various ways by ambitious people. According to our knowledge, we know that there are three ways to take over by force, also known as a "coup d'etat", in a more democratic, more fair way, or through a political agreement I will.

Understanding and understanding the history of Hawthorn and Brent When reading many novels it is important to understand and understand social, political and cultural history, especially Linda Brent 's "Slave girls' life events" and Nathaniel It is important. · A short story written by Hawthorne. The two authors had many absolute information about their work before reading their work. If you do not know what is going on in the world of the outside world or the respected writer, you can understand what the author is trying to say or what he really or what she is talking really means can not. Brent has a doctorate American culture specializing in film studies from the University of Michigan. She is a freelance writer and teaches courses in the history of American movies. In the next article, Brent explains the principle of equal opportunity in Rawls' fair justice theory. One of the main concerns of Rawls is that it depends in part on the social, entity, and childhood of the possibility of someone's success in life, so how to solve the problem of equal opportunity It is whether to adjust it. Growth of psychological state Understanding and understanding the history of Hawthorn and Brent When reading many novels it is important to understand and understand social, political and cultural history, especially Linda Brent 's "Slave girls' life events" and Nathaniel It is important. · A short story written by Hawthorne. The two authors had many absolute information about their work before reading their work. - History magazine The library you choose to find a historical magazine is at the University of Buffalo at Amherst Campus. After traveling to two different opportunities and quickly browsing about 20 different journals, I finally chose a small part I think is the expectation of the historical journal. These are soft or hard covers from streamlined 100 pages to powerful 500 page books. There may be clues to Hawthorn's own family history. Like Goodman Brown, Hawthorn was born and raised in Salem, Massachusetts. Nathaniel Hawthorne was a descendant of John Hawthorne and hosted a notorious witch trial. Two fallen women, Goodies Cloyse and Cory, mentioned in the story were sent to do magic during that time. I know that there is no guilt for written evidence about the author's idea or his ancestral activities, but Goodman Brown certainly has reasons to feel a certain degree of family disgrace with past events .

Although the existence of the Statue of Liberty symbolizes the justice and freedom in the United States, the unfair system we observe clearly shows false statements. Civil disobedience is always a problem in our society as many people are opposed to unfair laws and actions in our country. The existence of the government brings benefits to the people by recognizing what is most beneficial to the people. They seem to ignore the big problems that affect us. I prefer to spend their time and energy on other minor dilemmas. Citizen's disobedience - 1386 words Chris · Thunder English 1AH Canon Professor April 30, 2013 When is the citizen opposed? The definition of civil disobedience is to refuse to follow government efforts to change laws and government policies or legislation. Without the government, our society may be confusing, so civil disobedience is not an effort to dissolve the US government. Sometimes when there is an unjust law and the government does not take the initiative to modify it, Why is illegal acts behaving citizens disobedience? When is civil disobedience morally justified? How should the law respond to people participating in civil disobedience? Discussion on civil disobedience tends to concentrate on the first two problems. The most widely accepted explanation of civil disobedience, known by John Rawls (1971), is public, nonviolent and due diligence designed to achieve legal or government policy It is an act of. change. Therefore, people participating in civil disobedience are willing to accept the legal consequences of their behavior as they show that they are faithful to the rule of law. Citizens oppose to be on the border that they are faithful to the law and are said to be legal protests, conscience rejection, revolutionary behavior, extreme protests, and, on the other hand, organized compulsion protests. Any form of nonviolent protest or rebellion is unfair and refuses to accept certain policies or laws as it is considered civil disobedience. The term civil disobedience was first created by David Henry Thoreau in the article "Disobedience of the Citizen" in 1848, and since then it has been used to refer to such activities (stanford. edu). It can be seen that many activities are important to overcome unjust laws, Gandhi 's salt march, or Josebov is seen in the anti - globalization movement (sojo.net), which dismantled France' s unpleasant company. In both cases, citizens are categorized as citizens' hatred because they can protest the unfair laws of non-violent exercise and hear their voices well. Another view on the meaning of civil disobedience is that it is a public, nonviolent, legitimate industrious political as it violates the law, usually designed to change government laws and policies It means that it is an act.

"It is impossible to fundamentally change the historical aspect without crime," Hermann Keyserling, one of many statements that served to explain the meaning of civil disobedience and the original power Said. Civil disobedience defined by Merriam Webster is "refusal to obey the government's request or order, especially refusal as a nonviolent collective measure to enforce government concessions". The most promising and easy-to-understand definition of citizen's disobedience is that India's Gandhi has given us "sympathy in the way that respects the difference". By the way, if there is a specific intention to violate the law it is advisable to examine whether criminal law specialists have "civil" disobedience. This particular state of mind is often regarded as the essence of crime, hence it is not a "citizen". Therefore, in my opinion, there is a concept of pre-planned "coherent" civil disobedience with inherent contradiction. But I like being based on a broader range of reasons. I believe that the notion of justice for civil disobedience is incompatible with the concept of American legal system. This is especially the case, society provides more orderly change than any other society, and each ethnic minority group (including ethnic minorities) is protected by a legal system that regulates the process of orderly development and change . Civil disobedience - citizen's disobedience to civil disobedience is to protest or deny certain laws in a nonviolent and passive way. The idea of ​​civil disobedience was created by Henry David Thoreau. He thinks that society can exist even without a strong state government, on his own terms, and can survive on the conditions of citizens. He believes that the government is not required to lead education, resettle territory and maintain national freedom. The concept of civil disobedience created by Thoreau already exists Citizen's disobedience - 1386 words Chris · Thunder English 1AH Canon Professor April 30, 2013 When is the citizen opposed? The definition of civil disobedience is to refuse to follow government efforts to change laws and government policies or legislation. Without the government, our society may be confusing, so civil disobedience is not an effort to dissolve the US government. Sometimes when there is an unjust law and the government does not take the initiative to modify it, Why is illegal acts behaving citizens disobedience? When is civil disobedience morally justified? How should the law respond to people participating in civil disobedience? Discussion on civil disobedience tends to concentrate on the first two problems. The most widely accepted explanation of civil disobedience, known by John Rawls (1971), is public, nonviolent and due diligence designed to achieve legal or government policy It is an act of. change. Therefore, people participating in civil disobedience are willing to accept the legal consequences of their behavior as they show that they are faithful to the rule of law. Citizens oppose to be on the border that they are faithful to the law and are said to be legal protests, conscience rejection, revolutionary behavior, extreme protests, and, on the other hand, organized compulsion protests.

The political concept of justice and how to rule society has led the literature through the history of mankind. In the work of Sophocles and the actions of Socrates, the concept of the law prescribed by the governance forces can be explained first in the ancient Greek world. This general concept has evolved over the centuries and is now often referred to as civil disobedience. For the work of Henry David Thoreau and Martin Luther King Jr., civil disobedience is a well-known political act of the Americans, the first is application to slavery, the second is application to separation is there. Civil disobedience - citizen's disobedience to civil disobedience is to protest or deny certain laws in a nonviolent and passive way. The idea of ​​civil disobedience was created by Henry David Thoreau. He thinks that society can exist even without a strong state government, on his own terms, and can survive on the conditions of citizens. He believes that the government is not required to lead education, resettle territory and maintain national freedom. The concept of civil disobedience created by Thoreau already exists Citizen's disobedience - 1386 words Chris · Thunder English 1AH Canon Professor April 30, 2013 When is the citizen opposed? The definition of civil disobedience is to refuse to follow government efforts to change laws and government policies or legislation. Without the government, our society may be confusing, so civil disobedience is not an effort to dissolve the US government. Sometimes when there is an unjust law and the government does not take the initiative to modify it, Why is illegal acts behaving citizens disobedience? When is civil disobedience morally justified? How should the law respond to people participating in civil disobedience? Discussion on civil disobedience tends to concentrate on the first two problems. The most widely accepted explanation of civil disobedience, known by John Rawls (1971), is public, nonviolent and due diligence designed to achieve legal or government policy It is an act of. change. Therefore, people participating in civil disobedience are willing to accept the legal consequences of their behavior as they show that they are faithful to the rule of law. Citizens oppose to be on the border that they are faithful to the law and are said to be legal protests, conscience rejection, revolutionary behavior, extreme protests, and, on the other hand, organized compulsion protests.

For a long time I have noticed that someone's education is not always consistent with his or her values, tenacity or humanitarian principles, but I still feel uneasy about most of my colleagues at school I will be shocked by how to make it. "I know a lot of people with Ph.D. If he hopes, my husband can do the same, but we want to put it on a new roof," she said with anger I heard a voice. I really thought we were friends, and she would be happy for me. Some colleagues behave as if the doctor is very wrong, but they informed me that they could have it as much as they wanted. Due to the lack of education about homosexuality in society, many homosexuals discriminate against them. Discrimination against anyone is wrong. The words "fagot" and "dyke" are often used to disappoint homosexuals. Last year, violence against homosexuals in major cities increased by 31%. Anti-gay violence continues to increase year by year. These crimes, known as hatred crimes, mainly include sexual orientation and religion. Disliked crimes are discussed in community service, but homosexuals report these crimes. By not reporting these crimes, accusations of homosexual communities have not been improved. Approximately 42% of homosexuals are attempting more than one suicide, because they can accept discrimination by state. 85% of homosexuals reported anti-gay rhetoric about homosexuals. So they will not try to find any help on what they are worried about. Research literature in many fields broadly supports discrimination against homosexuals and lesbian citizens within the United States. This article provides a detailed analysis of this discrimination and shows a striking contrast between lesbian and homosexual discrimination and the concept of equality and just social justice in American society. Rawls 'research, and later Nasbaum' s research provides a theoretical framework emphasizing factors related to such discrimination and inequality. In the conclusion section, concrete consequences for future policy development are presented to ensure that gays and lesbians are not subject to further discrimination. The field of censorship includes civil society, marriage of homosexuals, adoption, hatred crime law, policies of the US military 'not requesting, not teaching, not pursuing' policies including military position and open gay to commander We are advocating participation of

I found my average writing ability. I mainly have English that is not my mother tongue my mother tongue and I have not received constructive feedback. In 2007 when I started blogging, I was writing in the Orkut community, and since the beginning of 2006, Facebook posts were less than 400 words (there was a limit on the number of words at the time). Most people I know are people like me, I think that they are writing because they are in English. Afterwards when accessing the Internet and various Web sites it was as easy as someone's blog and news portal. Then I began to read clothing magazines sold at a quarter of the actual price, and I noticed that writing required a lot of elements. So I stopped writing and started reading. A lot of reading helped a lot. About twelve years from now, I can average all. I am good at speaking stories and poetry. The company blog is also very good. I am sorry, I study everyday. Read alot However, my Hindi writing always outperforms the average. This is not very good, but it is better than writing my English. I would like to share the event. I entered the room with the writer Vikas Swaroop (Q & A, Slam, billionaire, six suspects, MeA spokesperson) and started talking about random things. I asked about his first book, Q & A to understand his thinking process. He just smiled and told me I wrote it and spent two months. It only takes time to release. I told you before he wrote that he was reading over 20 years, it is clear in the story of the book. It is a bit familiar. Writing is one of the skills that people are a bit dangerous. Having people read your words will make you feel uneasy, sensitive, and ultra fragile. Regardless of the theme, someone will feel uncomfortable for public consumption. Are you dissatisfied with the writing skills? Maybe that's not about your writing but how many books you have read and how much their reading time can help you improve your skills. Someone mentioned the old adage, "When he has 10,000 hours, the pilot will be considered a real pilot." People with proofreading skills can be considered the best experience and smart leaders. This means that he is trying to find languages, styles, and anecdotes that can be used in his writings, as well as he is reading. Some journal commentators can even distinguish between some of the writers behind the paper whether they are native American or British. If you are not confident of your writing skill (or even if you are) the best advice is to write short sentences. In fact, short sentences may be interesting styles. The following is excerpted from Sir Denning's book "Legal Procedures". This is "Master of Rawls". This is one of the most prominent judges in Britain. Believe it or not, this book is very interesting. It is worth reading. "I returned to the commentator now, Reply from the UK was expressed with two anonymous postcards I received, one said" Your bad coward. " Satisfied newspaper applauded us and the dean of the seminary had only written "thank you for doing justice for our young people".

Michael Sandell is an excellent political philosopher and professor at Harvard University. Sandell is known for his criticism of John Rawls' theory of justice. He is a famous professor of the government, but he also studied the ethics of biotechnology. At Harvard University, Sandell taught a course called "ethics, biotechnology, humanity" and served as the president's bioethics committee from 2002 to 2005 (Harvard University Department, 2013). Harvard philosopher Michael Sandell recently spoke on his new book, "Opposition to completion: ethics of genetic engineering era" at Stanford University. His focus on "the ethical question of using biomedical techniques to identify and select genetic material in human embryos" caused a lot of debate. First, genetic engineering shapes their destiny by restricting the autonomy of children. Author Dinesh D'Souza says in the 2001 National Review online article: "If parents can regain the genetic makeup of their children, in a sense they will write genetic guidance that will affect their lives - with blue eyes, not brown eyes, If they are taller than medium height, if they choose a passive character rather than aggressive, that choice will have a direct, lifelong impact on me. " Earlier this year Professor Michael Sandell of Harvard University made a speech at the World Economic Forum. I accidentally found his interview this weekend, and I could not understand this since. In question and answer, Sundel was asked to seek advice from unstable Democratic Party. They believed that the Democratic Party became technically dominant in political messages. The interviewer compelled him to present a bumper sticker policy like "Let me rejuvenate America", but Sandell dismissed the obsession with this abbreviation. "The philosopher is not good at slogans," he acknowledged to the audience, and then continued to show what a good philosopher actually did: speak in detail. In the fifteen minutes, he proposed four political themes, and Democrats have to reevaluate to win again. Harvard 's political philosopher Michael Sundel recently told columnist Thomas Friedman, "We have found a way to manage irresponsible forces related to the industrial revolution Today, we understand management and the way of digital revolution Relative irresponsible power "New government regulations are not always answers. However, there are serious loopholes in the accountability of private technology companies, and those products are now intertwined with our lives within the range we could not imagine a few years ago. (Greg Greene has posted a wonderful tweet documenting the extent of the regulatory failure inherent in our current digital environment.

Nietzsche announced his greatest fear of human ordinaryness. Life is tired, weak will, there is no danger, this person is only comfort and safety. This is "equality" written by Vonnegut. George was weak and satisfied with obedience, so I did not want to dismantle the jacket almost at home. In addition to the result of deep personal revolution as a human mind and body, slavery love can not be established. In Bergeron's society, everyone is forced to equality and George's remark to hazel proves that this revolution has begun. In the American society, more subtle measures are taken in this direction. Please consider the following two concepts. Political correctness is the beginning of efforts to control people's mind and in the future can lead to other fields; in education do not let children lag behind and everyone "on the same page" Try to be like that. This is impossible. There is no way for everyone to be equal in all respects. Without an accident, there is always a difference between men and women (even if they could all have the same height, same level of charm, same level intelligence etc). Regarding the desirability, I think this is awful. After all, there are many things to do in every society. These tasks require different skills and interests. If everyone is the same, some of these tasks will be satisfied (or will be met by those who are very dissatisfied). For example, if everyone is a person like me, no one wants scientists, classical musicians, actors. Therefore, a completely homogeneous society will be very bad, as everyone wants to do the same and can not do a lot of things. No, this is impossible. This is what Vonnegut wants when setting all these carefully created obstacles to enter the competitive environment, but after hundreds of years of correction the government has not done so yet. How can we maintain equal wealth? If everyone's money is robbed from them, it will be evenly distributed. Is there anything that was reassigned every few weeks? Then there are other aspects of life, such as purely subjective appearance. It is impossible to measure subjective problems. At that time, Vonnegut's view was to stop society from stopping seeking this ideal of equality, except for law. As Philip Fetzer explains, "... even if it is possible to build society based on equal ability, it is impossible to do it, leaders are not born in an incompetent society, great There is no new idea for art and literary work, society will soon be stagnant. "The second example is Vonnegut, which shows the reader the impact of an equal society. In other words, George and Hazel are talking about how society looks without obstacles to equalize all people. Because he had to wear obstacles in his ear, George could not think for more than a few seconds at a time, and diverted his thought by randomly making loud noise. Everyone with "average" intelligence must wear such equipment to eliminate unjust intellectual interests. But by frightening the hearts of truly intellectual people, the government is also creating a society that does not change anything. John Rawls' justice theory helps human beings create a fair society possible, but that is not the most ideal society. The most important thing to note is that the Soviet Union Russia has tried one of three possible options, ie, everyone is equal in every respect. The idea itself is excellent overall but the execution is terrible. The human factor in the concept of the equality society is always its downfall, so execution is wrong. Even distribution of goods will provide equal standards to everyone, but the quality of life will decline sharply. Likewise, humans also want to increase their power. John Rawls believes that equal distribution of power creates the most fair society. Even without the true administrative authority, everyone can access the same thing. But true balance is never obtained. There will always be people who want to go beyond others who will cause chaotic c

In this respect, this is an interesting concept because the term "responsibility" is much stronger than "correct" or "free". Of course, Locke believes citizens have the right to resist unfairness and freedom of disobedience, but argues that if the government knows that the unfairness is morally rebellious To do. Locke believes that citizens are obligated to comply with the law as long as they accept social contracts with the government and the government plays a part of the contract. Among them, the most patriotic person. Because civil disobedience or opposition is not only an important part of liberal democracy but also a country of free rights, patriotism is condemned by the practice of civil disobedience to be legal and fair. The definition of civil disobedience uses only two elements of a term. "Citizen" refers to problems including citizens or citizens, "disobedience" refers to acts that violate the law (Brownlee). There is little word of justice in this brief analysis ... as Karl Marx suggests, civil disobedience is determined by human suffering. When people are repressed, his reincarnation is rebellious. In the past, excessive movement of most people included illegal acts. For one hundred people, violence is a means. Today our lives are recorded by violence and human suffering, but paradoxes will arise if revolutionaries are released from oppression using violence as a means to achieve their goals. Approximately 30% of the population lives in a society that frequently commits disobedience of citizens. There is no doubt that society is not very stable. A group of other people regularly carries out civil disobedience and hopes to protest against their own pet problem. If so, 60% of the population will often commit civil disobedience. If such a large number of people regularly violate the law, society will collapse and become chaotic. Why is illegal acts behaving citizens disobedience? When is civil disobedience morally justified? How should the law respond to people participating in civil disobedience? Discussion on civil disobedience tends to concentrate on the first two problems. The most widely accepted explanation of civil disobedience, known by John Rawls (1971), is public, nonviolent and due diligence designed to achieve legal or government policy It is an act of. change. Therefore, people participating in civil disobedience are willing to accept the legal consequences of their behavior as they show that they are faithful to the rule of law. Citizens oppose to be on the border that they are faithful to the law and are said to be legal protests, conscience rejection, revolutionary behavior, extreme protests, and, on the other hand, organized compulsion protests.

This important article, based on the concept of Rawls and Kings, examined the possibility of American justice and introduced a lot of American society at the famous "I Have a Dream" speech in 1963. Proposition Today, we have made many progress in the racial equality he sought. But, as a country, we still can not open the door to the opportunity for all the children of God, as gold said eloquently. In part, this is because, despite our society reaching some degree of political non-discrimination, this political non-discrimination has not led to economic non-discrimination. American racial discrimination and prejudice niggas, Spick, Kick, Clark. Disliked speech that resonates with the whole racist ideal. Society tends to see only superficial prejudice. It is easy to ignore racial discrimination hidden under the water, which is part of the American life. I am talking about indifference. Indifference makes the part of hatred a part of America's life. I do not say that most Caucasians have KKK robes in their closets and like to burn the cross. - Fear and silence Some experiences have such influences, they will change your life forever. The tragedy that happened on September 11 is certainly one of them. After the explosion, my mother and brothers prohibited my grandmother from leaving home for any discrimination against Muslims. We are afraid of her because she is wearing a scarf. So how does she get involved in my brother 's wedding issue? Does racial discrimination or prejudice exist even today? The United States does not have racial discrimination in the sense that the law prohibits all kinds of racial discrimination. However, racism still remains in the minds of people to a certain extent. In general, prejudice against others against others is alleviated based on race or other similar social background. However, these prejudices have not completely disappeared. The majority of American citizens still seem to have various degrees of racial prejudice.

Political disobedience will occur when a person in a country feels that it is important to change the government. Since unique provinces have different plans on government obligations, there are lots of explanations that can be imagined behind political contempt. British therapist and rationalist John Rock did not appear until 1704, and distributed his generous speculation about government, property and human rights to his book "Government's Second Paper". Various criticisms have been issued against the philosophy and practice of civil disobedience. While fundamentally criticizing disobedience to the philosophy of citizens condemns accepting existing political structures, conservative thinking considers the logical extension of civil disobedience as disorder, individuals always I have the right to break the law he chose. . Activists themselves differ in their own interpretation of social transformation about disobedience of citizens as an overall philosophy, or simply no other means of exercise. At a practical level, the effectiveness of civil disobedience depends on whether the other party claims a particular morality and ultimately can appeal. Justice and civil disobedience Philosophical disobedience is one of the most important rights to be given to all citizens. By citizen's disobedience, citizens can have the authority to legislate to change the changes that they feel necessary to hide their feelings about the government and to satisfy the whole society. Are ethical citizens responsible for complying with the law? Plato's "Critics" and Martin Luther King, Socrates of Junior I answered this contradiction in his "Letters from Birmingham Prison" For centuries it has been widely believed that this is disobedience of citizens. For the work of Henry David Thoreau and Martin Luther King Jr., civil disobedience is a well-known political act of the Americans, the first is application to slavery, the second is application to separation is there. Thoreau's article "citizen's disobedience" and the King's "Birmingham Prison Letter" are the main arguments for deciding and encouraging the use of citizen's disobedience to create justice from the government. John Rawls is an excellent political philosopher, but his civil disobedience definition is absurd. Disobedience of citizens is not just "official, nonviolent and responsible political acts to violate the law, usually to change laws and government policies". It is an important device to maintain the effectiveness of the public sector and ensures that valuable perspectives are taken into account. But most importantly, it is important and necessary political freedom in our society.

Civil disobedience is a deliberate violation of law to promote ethical principles and change government policy. It may be limited to violations of certain laws considered inequitable, such as the civil rights movement of the United States in the 1960s. Alternatively, civil disobedience may include other law violations to raise concerns about unfairness, such as physical damage, default of payment of taxes or payment of taxes, interference with construction work and illegal invasion . People who practice all kinds of civil disobedience are willing to accept the results of their actions as a means to promote their behavior. Henry David Thoreau first described the principle of civil disobedience in the article "On Responsibility for Civil Disobedience" in 1849. He believes that when conscience contradicts the law, individuals have an obligation to promote justice by violating the law. Civil disobedience is the main strategy of women's suffrage movement, modern Gandhi's Indian independence movement, American civil rights movement, and abolition of apartheid in South Africa. Examples of recent civil disobedience include the refusal of UK public opinion polls and public opinion polls in 1990, as well as activities for some animal rights and abortion prevention activists. [1] There is always discussion on whether civil disobedience is inevitably nonviolent. The Black Law Dictionary contains nonviolence in the definition of civil disobedience. An article in the encyclopedia of Christian Bay states that civil disobedience necessitates "carefully chosen legal instrument", but I do not believe that they are necessarily non-violent. Civil disobedience and civil revolts are proved by relying on constitutional flaws, but since the rebellion is more destructive, it is justified if rebellion flaws can not prove civic rebellion Then you can not prove that civil disobedience uses power and violence and refuses to accept arrests. It is said that citizens who do not listen to avoid violence will also help to maintain social tolerance for civil disobedience. Nonviolence: The problem that is controversial in the debate about civil disobedience is nonviolence. Like publicity, nonviolence is said to reduce the negative impact of law breach. Some theorists further say, by definition, civil disobedience is nonviolent. According to Rawls, violent acts that can cause harm are incompatible with civil disobedience as a solution. Rawls said, "That's true" Any interference with others' civil liberties tends to obscure the civil disobedience of their behavior (Rolls 1971, 366). Historically, the immigration controversy brought civic disobedience. Disobedience of the citizen cuts both directions. Most recently in Proposal No. 187 and 2006, many service providers are more aware of citizens' failure to comply with the law requiring them to turn someone into an immigrant or refuse to provide a service We supported supporting submission. Cardinal Mahoney encouraged Catholics to take such a position. Then some people take different positions. They believed that borders protection failed, so they monitored the border between Mexico and the United States. They call themselves "militia". Faith is very strong to immigration and immigration problems Investigated the disobedience of the citizens of Sophocles' Antigone, the letter from the King of Birmingham Prison, and the refusal to criticize Plato's citizens, and created important and widely debated items by many famous wisdom scholars. The problem shows many examples of civil disobedience. Disobedience of citizens is also noticed in Sophocles' Antigone, King letter, Birmingham 's prison letter, as well as rhetorical analysis of Plato' s "Birmingham Prison Letter". Dr. Martin Luther King at Birmingham Prison answered an article by the eight clerics who explained the racial injustice of Birmingham and the reasons of Kim's organization protesting civil rights, introduced himself, stated at the beginning of th

1 Robert Nozick first mentioned this negative right. He said that these rights impose responsibility on others, let them be alone, and let him do important things like speaking of his own ideas and making his own decisions. Since we place great emphasis on not violating the negative rights of others, these rights also have normative weights. H. Ethics is the first mainstream of Plato and Aristotle, which refers to individuals, not his behavior. Here, morality derives from the identity and / or personality of an individual and does not come from the reflection (or the result) of an individual's behavior. In morality, morality is the result of inner virtue. Aristotle's main objective is to realize Udonmonia through virtue ethics, which is "activities that rely on the perfect soul". (Nichomachean Ethics) According to Aristotle, the most important virtue is wisdom. He further believes that each virtue is the average between the corresponding two vices. One is redundancy and the other is defect. For example, courage is a virtue seen between timidity and recklessness. The tradition of Veda also follows morality. Therefore, after various prohibitions, moral tales, interpretation of the laws of nature, Veda will help us keep learning good value - if you violate it will naturally hurt your life. It can bridge the gap between time and eternity. Rigveda (51.15) also pointed out that we can follow the path of good when the sun and the moon follow their way. All good ideas that are pure, smooth, overflowing may come to our side. (89.1) The West dominated the Middle East and eventually tried to conquer it - but the Palestinians did not give them such opportunities, as long as it became the enemy of Israel's West Israel, I will consume. When the Palestinians protested a few days inside and outside the oil resources and then they became terrorists, the United States announced what they call the fight against terrorism. 43 Discussion about moral theory (Liberalism and humanitarian theory are trying to prevent terrorism) 4.3.2 Discuss natural ethics and other ethical issues in the context of terrorism. "Ethics" is just a word of today; the concept it represents "Karmavadins are those who believe that fate depends on their behavior, so to live a high quality of life karma must be done well and the consequences of these actions are the life In order to bring happiness. 43.4 When discussing different forms of ethics, we must talk about Rawls' justice principle. The veil of ignorance does not know the torture, wisdom and strength of his own natural assets and abilities in a society where no one knows his position, social position, position, no morality of these social beings is determined If so, then such morality will be one time only "In my argument, I am dealing with terrorism, I am called terrorist (that is, a person who resists hardship to death), and Sen does not mention it in his books Any terrorism problem , Here I am trying to adapt to the concept of Sen's justice. Information ethics: investigate ethical issues arising from the development and application of computers and information technology. Issues of concern include information privacy, whether the human agent is ethical, how people act in the information circle, and ownership rights arising from the creation, collection, recording, distribution, processing of information, etc. There is a copyright problem. The purpose of this paper is to apply ethics analysis and modeling techniques to deepen the understanding of the environment that encourages or promotes ethical issues related to terrorism and terrorism and anti-terrorism. This document is organized as follows. Sections 1.1 and 2 provide a framework for ethics analysis of sections 3 to 5 by discussing the various definitions of terrorism and the context of terrorism and the meaning of individual and collective responsibility. Section 3 introduces several different approaches to the ethics analysis of t