Patriotism and People Who Commit Acts of Civil Disobedience

In this respect, this is an interesting concept because the term "responsibility" is much stronger than "correct" or "free". Of course, Locke believes citizens have the right to resist unfairness and freedom of disobedience, but argues that if the government knows that the unfairness is morally rebellious To do. Locke believes that citizens are obligated to comply with the law as long as they accept social contracts with the government and the government plays a part of the contract.

Among them, the most patriotic person. Because civil disobedience or opposition is not only an important part of liberal democracy but also a country of free rights, patriotism is condemned by the practice of civil disobedience to be legal and fair. The definition of civil disobedience uses only two elements of a term. "Citizen" refers to problems including citizens or citizens, "disobedience" refers to acts that violate the law (Brownlee). There is little word of justice in this brief analysis ... as Karl Marx suggests, civil disobedience is determined by human suffering. When people are repressed, his reincarnation is rebellious. In the past, excessive movement of most people included illegal acts. For one hundred people, violence is a means. Today our lives are recorded by violence and human suffering, but paradoxes will arise if revolutionaries are released from oppression using violence as a means to achieve their goals.

Approximately 30% of the population lives in a society that frequently commits disobedience of citizens. There is no doubt that society is not very stable. A group of other people regularly carries out civil disobedience and hopes to protest against their own pet problem. If so, 60% of the population will often commit civil disobedience. If such a large number of people regularly violate the law, society will collapse and become chaotic.

Why is illegal acts behaving citizens disobedience? When is civil disobedience morally justified? How should the law respond to people participating in civil disobedience? Discussion on civil disobedience tends to concentrate on the first two problems. The most widely accepted explanation of civil disobedience, known by John Rawls (1971), is public, nonviolent and due diligence designed to achieve legal or government policy It is an act of. change. Therefore, people participating in civil disobedience are willing to accept the legal consequences of their behavior as they show that they are faithful to the rule of law. Citizens oppose to be on the border that they are faithful to the law and are said to be legal protests, conscience rejection, revolutionary behavior, extreme protests, and, on the other hand, organized compulsion protests.